Deaf patients require interpreters fluent in sign language. Federal law mandates you provide one. The defendant in today's episode provided his deaf patient with someone beyond adept in sign language - a member of his staff who happened to be the mother of a deaf child. And yet - when treatment ended, a lawsuit was served.  It alleged the patient was not provided with a qualified interpreter and experienced a sub-optimal outcome as a result. 

Could anything have been done to avoid this end? Jeff and Mike discuss...