View Details

The compartmentalizing of religion, the separation of church and state, and the closet Christianity of modern America resulted from the communist and totalitarian inability to eradicate Christians by persecution. Instead, they allowed them to play religion (nicely) if they would not attempt to interfere with government affairs (Legutko 2018, 161-164). So long as it could preach John 3:16, the Church was willing to strike a deal with the Devil.

Being much more intelligent, the Devil knows for the peasants to accept John 3:16 (a tradition of men as the inspired word of God has no verse or chapters and no section was meant to be separated from the whole), they need a foundation first. The foundation is found in the rest of the Bible and the knowledge of the truthfulness of Christianity. The modern evangelical church believed it could get away with preaching only John 3:16 and people would have emotional experiences and still convert. Instead, when separated from a biblical worldview, culture, laws, and truth, people view “the Gospel” as they should, which is foolishness. If the Bible is false, why accept what John 3:16 says? Should they accept something just because someone has “shared” an inward emotion-ridden “experience” they applied to Jesus? There are plenty of lunatics making similar claims about their own very divergent experiences. Drugs and delusions produce the same, often more powerful results.

Gnosticism has always been an issue with the Church; it was our earliest heresy. It is still potent but to a lesser strength in evangelical America. They only care for the “spiritual” or heaven, but not earth. They seek only to save and rescue us from here. They consider current life, happiness, and earthly concerns or objects as of little value or even evil in themselves. The modern American Church has reduced Christianity to John 3:16 and then struggled to determine why many reject the message earlier ages accepted. I think evangelicals, in particular, are critical of a supposed sub-par and corrupt Church in the Middle Ages too focused on the saints, Mary, and the Crusades.

Unfortunately, pride is common among men, and even the Church is not exempt. We need to look at the state of the Church today. If we do so, how can we criticize a society converting a pagan world, pushing back an expanding Islamic wave, and publicly challenging opposing worldviews? How could the medieval Church maintain a population almost wholly Christian? Did they have more preachers? Perhaps. Did they have more devotionals, daily Bible reading, Christian radio stations, and multiple copies of the Bible in every home? Certainly not.

The most significant difference in their success was they implemented a Christian society and did not compartmentalize John 3:16 from the rest of the Bible. During the Middle Ages, they purposely structured laws to ensure spiritual health. In Wessex, they set up laws “considering of the health of our souls and of the stability of our realm.”(“The Avalon Project: Anglo-Saxon Law – Extracts From Early Laws of the English.”, n.d.) Magna Carta’s purpose was not only about restoring liberty but also, says King John in its preamble, “For the salvation of our soul, and those of all our ancestors and heirs, and unto the honor of God and the advancement of his Holy Church and for the rectifying of our realm.”(“The Avalon Project: Magna Carta”, n.d.)

There was no separation of Church and state; they did not attempt to pretend a secular society is unbiased, and they understood political laws would have a spiritual impact. For example, if society accepted unlawful marriages and normalized adultery, Saint Boniface warned, a “race ignoble and scorning God must necessarily issue from such unions.”(Durant 1950, 456) A law legalizing divorce and neglecting to punish adultery would directly affect the salvation of the next generation. Unfortunately, this truth is lost on modern evangelicals who think we must only “preach the Gospel.” During the Middle Ages culture, laws, politics, education, everything was connected to eternal salvation. There was no “religious” or “secular” sphere; everything was molded to the glory of God. The goal was Christendom. No aspect of society was to be separated from Him.

A Christian society produces a culture and people who readily accept John 3:16 because it cultivated their worldview to accept what the Gospel rested on, the whole of the Bible, and a Christian worldview. The heavy lifting, the planting, the nurturing, and the growth were in place; the reaping was the easy part.

For one, they taught the Bible as an accurate historical record. They were “Creationists,” believing God created the world in the recent past, and the events recorded, such as Noah’s flood and the Tower of Babel, were historical events. So, each nation could trace its ancestors back to Noah and his sons and before them to Adam and Eve (Ross and McLaughlin 1977, 233) (J. A. Giles Giles, J. A. (John Allen, n.d., History Of The Britons (Historia Brittonum) by Nennius). In the early history of the world, the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle focuses primarily on Israel and later the apostles and the Church. It records significant dates such as the miracles done by various saints, the installation of popes, and when kings were baptized and converted. When these are your major historical events, it becomes history, not faith. The faithful were surrounded by stories of wonders and miracles following living saints, the demonic activity of witches and pagans, and divine intervention granting the Holy City back to Christians. There was no reason to doubt, God was ever-present. In other words, followers did not have to jump through mental hoops to accept Christianity; it was self-evidently true. Since the Bible is an accurate historical record of God’s dealing with man, why not accept John 3:16 as God’s accurate salvation message? If He got it right in the Old Testament, he probably got it correct in the New.

The early and medieval Church produced many works defending the truth of Christianity. Whether to communicate, argue and debate with Muslims, Jews, atheists, or heretics, the Church was prepared to defend the faith and show the falsehood of other belief systems. After observing heretics who were getting the better of Catholic monks in public debates, Saint Dominic began a group, later becoming the Dominicans, to engage in public debates with them. He and his followers “debated the Cathars whenever and wherever they could” (Daileader, n.d. Heretics And Heresy). The Church did not teach relativism and tolerance; instead, they forced Jews, pagans, and Muslims to debate in public and defend their views against Christian apologists. They started apologetic schools to defend Christianity and to debate opposing worldviews, which according to Professor Warren H. Carroll allowed them to “meet and vanquish every opponent, at least intellectually” Carroll 1993, 161-162). You did not have to guess at the truth; many would point you there.

Unlike the modern church, which allows secularists to educate, the medieval Church understood this would lead people from Christ. Part of the purpose of education was to prepare the student for “spiritual warfare” or apologetics (Jarrett 2007, 31-32). So, they prevented our modern situation from arising by intellectually confronting and refuting opposing views. The early 14th-century Dominican author Robert Holcot complained about the French being unprepared to defend the faith, stating that when a “new interpretation of Scripture challenged traditional Christianity,” would say, “seek not the things that are too high for thee and search not into things above thy ability.” According to Holcot, it was “not because they really mean it but because they are ashamed of their own ignorance”(Jarrett 2007, 32). Any modern Christian who has dabbled in apologetics today and attempted to discuss issues with nominal Christians will find this attitude that Holcot encountered is prevalent today, as is secularism.

While the Dominicans were considered the intellectual apologists, and the Franciscans were better known for acts of service and preaching the Gospel, nonetheless Professor Daileader described their method of preaching as “you would know when a group of Franciscans had come to your town because they would go to the town square or someplace where there was certain to be some group of people, and they would begin to argue with them. They would walk up to you and engage you in debate. They would ask you questions and when you responded to their questions, they would ask you more questions, they almost tried to pick fights.” He goes on “Whether you wanted to debate or not, they would follow you around town pestering you until you would finally argue with them” (Daileader, n.d. Francis of Assisi-Franciscan). Saint Francis went to great lengths to start debates with Muslims when he traveled to Egypt. While demonstrating a deep knowledge of the Koran and the person of Muhammad, he was able to best multiple of the king’s top Imams simultaneously.

When a church leader encountered heresy or a new doctrine among the faithful, they would call a council where disagreements could be debated and tested against Scripture and earlier declarations from the authoritative councils. Christianity was not a custom, a choice, or a personal opinion; it was a revealed truth shaping society. Medieval Christianity was not our modern playful, feel-good, self-help tame religion; they believed it, and it changed their actions and held an authoritative impact over every aspect of society. They lived as if eternity was more important than this life.

Daileader said the “hallmark” of education taught at universities was medieval scholasticism which was “based on argument… scholastic authors love conflict, they actively search out for conflict” (Daileader, n.d. Origins of Scholasticism). The typical teaching method was to have the entire class pick a subject and then debate it using authorities like the Bible, Church Fathers, philosophers, etc.; each side would be heard and contested with counter-arguments. You were expected to know and present the best arguments counter to your own position.(Jarrett 2007, 34) Historian Will Durant described the effects of the scholastic debate-centered method of learning: “Such debates, formal or informal, sharpened the Medieval mind, and gave scope for much freedom of thought and speech” (Durant 1950, 921). Well-known intellectuals like Peter Abelard would pick fights with the leading professors across France, just to show he could defeat them in debate.

The challenge to different worldviews was not the only intense debate within Christendom. Historian Will Durant wrote, “the divergence and conflicts within orthodoxy were almost as intense as between faith and unbelief” (Durant 1950, 960). In response to some faculty members at the University of Paris, Thomas Aquinas declared “If, then, there be anyone who, boastfully taking pride in his supposed wisdom, wishes to challenge what we have written, let him not do it in some corner, nor before children who are powerless to decide on such difficult matters. Let him reply openly if he dare. He shall find me here confronting him… we shall do battle with his errors, and bring the cure to his ignorance” (Durant 1950, 960).

During that time, Christians engaged in intellectual debates with their friends and foes. Their involvement in apologetics and studying made them stronger-minded and more dedicated Christians ready to take on all opposition. As Peter Abelard stated in the 12th century, “By doubting, we come to inquiry, and by inquiry, we arrive at the truth.” Their perspective is why believe something if it is false, when if you test and debate all things, you will arrive at the truth (Proverbs 18:17, I Thessalonians 5:21). However, modern Christians often take Christianity solely on faith, turning it into a personal and emotional experience reflecting their own truth. As a result, few Christians today follow the intellectual belief and defense of the medieval mold and have far less impact on our world, their faith is often weak and hidden. Being raised by secular education, most modern Christians cannot provide a logical defense of their worldview. Yet they expect logical-thinking people to accept their “faith” when they share it with them. Asking logical people to accept ungrounded “faith” is not only illogical but unbiblical.

Give me a society ruled by biblical law and morality, believing and eager to defend the Bible as an accurate historical account of life on earth, and I will show you a people ripe for evangelism. And when your family, village, and society are Christian, it becomes easy to accept; you don’t want to be the oddball. Modern Protestant pastor Matthew J. Trewhella wrote, “It is important to understand that the Gospel is never heard in isolation. It is always heard against the backdrop of the cultural milieu in which one lives. If one lives in a culture or nation where good laws prevail that mirror the law and justice of God, one can more readily understand the claims of the Gospel than in a culture or nation where the laws contradict the law and justice of God” (Trewhella 2013, 88).

Further, lacking modern democratic sensibilities, the medieval social structure did not hinder evangelization. In kingship, the hierarchy starts at the top, with God as the king; the law and rulers are his agents, reflecting his character, purpose, and design. A society designed and structured after this pattern produces people who are readily willing to submit to the lord of lords. A Christian king at the head of a hierarchy directs people upward to God. It shows society should be governed and molded by that higher power. Kings are a reflection of the divine image and his law; the people look to and honor the king, so it becomes easy to honor what he imperfectly represents. The “prayer pose” still used today of two hands together is a feudal pose a vassal makes when accepting his lord; Jesus is your eternal lord who happens to be above your temporal one. He is not just your lord but your lord’s lord.

Kingship makes it easy to accept God who works through Christian kings who are his reflection. On the other hand, a leveling democracy is man and secular-centered. Thus, its citizens are much less likely to “look up,” and if they do, it is likely with hostility at the very thought of inequality and hierarchy that “looking up” entails. It is hard to see God at the top of our structure of squabbling politicians lying, manipulating, abusing power and money. When society is structured to follow the King of Kings, it becomes easy to fall in line and accept him as a given, just as democracy makes relativism, infighting, theft and abuse readily accepted today. The leaders’ actions and beliefs affect all of society.

When Christians converted nations from paganism, they often first went after the kings knowing if you could convert them and the nation would follow those they honored. The same thing occurs today: kids honor politicians, sports stars, actors, and musicians they copy and idolize. Convert the lord; you convert his people. Thus, moral decay often stems from the powerful and filters down to the peasants.

Under Christendom, democratic societal hurdles are removed, and being a Christian becomes natural. You don’t “believe” John 3:16 because it is what your “religion” or culture is; you accept it because it is the revealed truth of God and has shaped society. In the same way you plant a seed in the soil, water it, and care for it, you accept Jesus as your savior because it is how God, similarly caring, designed you to function. It becomes a given; of course, Jesus is Lord. It becomes natural, and any deviation from God’s design is abnormal. This led to large sections of society giving their lives to how they could best serve God. There was no shortage of such people in the Middle Ages.

Modern evangelical preachers seem to think of evangelization like bingo, play enough times, and eventually, you will get the correct numbers and “win” a convert. They wholly ignore the impact of contemporary worldviews. They get so excited at any chance to “share the Gospel” with a secular world but never consider why the audience is not very receptive. They can blame it on sin and feel comfort in the truth “Jesus is coming back soon,” enabling them not to do what the medievals did, contest a secular society, defend truth and stand like men. Instead, they can keep thumping away at John 3:16 and contort the Bible to claim this is the Church’s only duty.

If you were to preach the Gospel to a village in England in 1100 A.D., I can assure you they would be receptive to the message; if you preach that same message at a university or government school today, they might remove you for hate speech. Due to the differences in law, customs, and worldview, the eleventh-century preacher would expect different results in Persia than in Paris. Further, like the apostle Paul in Acts, they would drastically alter their approach to evangelization based on the audience. Evangelicals pretend modern Americans are first-century Jews.

Brazil is known for its outstanding soccer teams and players. There have only been a few NBA players from Brazil. The reason is not due to a lack of population or athletes; it is because Brazilians are in love with soccer!!! If their society suddenly “converted” to basketball, you would discover they would be producing top-level players in just a few years. And while you will find the rare basketball player from Brazil, most great athletes will be soccer players. In modern America, we are attempting to create Christians in a secular culture. Still, we can’t figure out why it’s not working, why churches are being demolished and replaced and why each generation is more secular.

In a world being taught truth is false, like Aquinas said, we must use our mind and apologetics to convey the truth (Rutler 2020, 24). When the New Testament Church preached to Jews who already accepted the Bible as revealed truth from God, they focused on Jesus being the promised messiah. But when they went beyond the borders of Israel (or of the Church) to pagan societies, their methods changed drastically. As did the early Church, which converted diverse pagan societies. They were on the offensive because they argued from the mind. In comparison, we are emotion-based and thus in retreat. By trying to convert our pagan world by emotion, we ask them to do something the Bible says not to do, accept a lie. To them, the Bible is demonstrably false, and any logical-thinking person whose education has only been from the secular state would agree. As Fr. George Rutler says, we need a personal relationship with Jesus, but it isn’t “A feeling of sentiment within me. It is my contact with the true God” (Rutler 2020). When God revealed himself in a burning bush, Moses did not just get a warm feeling; no, he encountered the true and living God and, following God’s command, took off his sandals, recognizing his feebleness next to the God of eternity. He did not know about Calvary, but he did encounter the truth.

Some American evangelical pastors treat evangelism like a con game. They attempt to trick people into coming to church by entertainment. They play horrible music as loud as they can and shout at people hoping to garner an emotional response to the Gospel. As a result, they create “converts” (and statistics to justify their methods) but not disciples. Numerous newly “saved” people leave in significant numbers shortly after because they never really encountered God or truth. They only had an emotional experience. This is also why a large percentage of “deathbed converts” who recover return to non-belief. They were in a heightened emotional state and reacted; this is what evangelical churches seek to replicate. So many of their new converts stray because their “faith” was based on emotion. If they encountered the true and living God, I think most would run and never come back, while a few would dedicate their lives to truth and willingly defend it.

The modern evangelical Church puts the cart before the horse. I was converted only after failing in every way I knew how to disprove Christianity in front of a learned apologist. He showed me Christianity has nothing to do with culture, or internal “beliefs,” experiences, or emotions, but, at its core, is true. It was not from man but from God. In my mind, I recognized it was true and prayed to God if He was real to show me. And then came a feeling I had never experienced. Beginning in my heart, I felt like it was on fire; it then spread through the rest of my body, but it was not a destructive fire. It was a cleansing renewal, almost a good burn if I had to explain it. The personal experience of encountering the divine came after the transformation of the mind when it encountered truth, not before. Our modern Church’s mode of evangelization treating people as first-century Bible-believing Jews and ignoring educational and, therefore, political influences, has directly led to its ineffectuality in influencing the culture and converting souls. Evangelical criticism of a much more productive Medieval Church seems to me to be the height of absurdity and pride.

In his book Why Men Hate Going to Church (revised and updated), author David Murrow shows how feminism has slowly intruded on the Church, leading to a massive gender gap, with far more women than men regularly attending services. Feminism’s intrusion into the Church leads to poor theology, distorts messages, significantly affects men’s participation in the Church and has contributed to a drastic overall decline in Church attendance in America.

For example, in older forms of hymn singing, men were called to a battlefield to fight for the kingdom of God on earth, but modern praise-worship songs “seem to summon men to the bedroom.” Modern praise and worship songs (also affected by the Christian music industry aiming at their target audience, middle-aged Christian mothers) focus on an intimate, personal relationship that borders on erotic in the male mind and focuses on intimacy and love in a female-to-male context, turning men away. Men follow and love a Lord, not a male lover.

Male fellowship and companionship derive from admiration and respect. They follow a leader. They love their Lord, but not in the same manner that middle-aged modern women do men, and they express it differently. Further, the Bible never says to have an intimate personal relationship with Jesus; Jesus did not call me to it. Christ called men to him as Lord. Friendship, admiration, respect, love, and a bond between brothers similar to warriors who go to war together follow, but these are not the modern Gospel message call.

Music and Church have become emotional feelings of “experience,” “spirit-filled,” and “spirit-led,” centered on a personal relationship with Jesus, who has also undergone a feminization as we ignore His male traits and focus on the feminine. Murrow writes, “The old worship was formal, corporate, and emotionless. The new worship is informal, individualistic, and touchy-feely. The old worship was about coming together to extol God; the new worship is about coming together to experience God.” The focus is now on the heart and not the head. We used to sing up towards God, but now we sing to him in a less hierarchical, more equality-based, horizontal way.

As women and feminism began to dominate churches, they began outlawing alcohol, gambling, and other things men engaged in. Once the Church began marketing to its largest consumer group, and discovered it was middle-aged women, it morphed into its current form. The Church used to be the kingdom of God focused hierarchically upwards, but has now become about equality, relationships, and preserving the family, as well as the “Church family” (as it is now referred to) being elevated above preserving God’s kingdom on earth. The Church has become one big welcoming and loving family to all, and this has replaced Kingdom mission work as the most vital component, to love others (in a feminine way).

The family replaced God as the essential object to uphold even though Jesus never spoke of domestic concerns and, in fact, split families apart by asking people to put the Kingdom of God first. In the modern Church, the family became more vital to uphold than God’s kingdom on earth.

In the Bible, the family is more about jurisdiction, law, inheritance, a local form of government, and how society ought to be structured. It was not the primary focus it has become since feminism has taken over. While the Bible endorsed sex between one man and one woman who are to produce offspring, it is not radically “pro-family” as modern feminist churches are. For example, Deuteronomy 24 allows divorce in certain circumstances. God divorced unfaithful Israel after having “married them” in Jeremiah 3:8 “Then I saw that for all the causes for which backsliding Israel had committed adultery, I had put her away and given her a certificate of divorce.”

While feminist influence on the Church has been slowly ongoing for centuries, it was accelerated by the Industrial Revolution (and the women’s rights movement). Money-making now became the male’s most vital role in society, and he was overworked. This left him exhausted, so women would handle everything on Sundays, the day of rest. He only had to pay his dues in the collection box, matching his Church function to that of his place in an industrial society. It is not surprising that over the decades since so many men have stopped attending church altogether.

The post Is Evangelical Criticism of the Medieval Church Just? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

All I am belongs to her.

I rise or fall, abated or accelerated, by the whims of her smile.

She has no need to impress,
I fall on bended knee to please her.

Before I was conceived, my love for her was true. I will love no other.

Sweet voices may call to me, entice my heart, but they are only hollow echoes, voices of monsters meant to draw me away.

Though demons mount their assault, I will not betray her.

Her sand and salt are as the blood that runs through my veins.

When she hurts, my body aches,
and her pains have been many.

My heart mourns in ghostly haunt, as the moss on her oaks memorialize many fallen sons.

O Carolina, how I long to be in your bosom again, to rest beneath your stars, as do my fathers.

Soon, my ancient love, you will call me home, and my spirit will fly to you one final time.

And once again, we will be united, I will be whole.

The post Carolina appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Pete Buttigieg removed the pronouns from his X account. Political junkies had an inkling as to why. Pete wants a Senate seat. Off to the middle he goes! Polling is already out despite no official statement. Mayor Pete has an uphill climb ahead of him.

One of Buttigieg’s biggest weaknesses in a Michigan Senate race is the fact that he is not from Michigan and has no deep personal or political ties to the state. Buttigieg is originally from South Bend, Indiana, where he served as mayor before running for president in 2020. Mayor Pete is a clawing creature, grasping for power wherever he can. He cannot win statewide in Indiana, as the last time he tried, he was trounced by over 25% of the vote. He knew his future would have to be elsewhere. In 2021, after joining the Biden administration as Secretary of Transportation, he moved to Traverse City, Michigan, his husband’s hometown. This move appears to be one of convenience rather than genuine connection, as it happened only after he took the cabinet position. Jokes on Michigan; he lives in D.C.

This outsider status makes him vulnerable to the “carpetbagger” label, and this move is just as transparent as Clinton’s NY move. American voters have historically been skeptical of outsiders running for high office. Recent Michigan political history suggests that successful statewide candidates typically have deep, long-term ties to the state machine, such as Governor Gretchen Whitmer, Senator Debbie Stabenow, and Senator Gary Peters. Unlike these figures, Buttigieg does not have a longstanding record of involvement in Michigan politics, governance, or community service.

Republicans and even some Democrats in the primary could use this against him by arguing that he does not understand Michigan’s economic and cultural concerns in the same way a lifelong Michigander would. Ever the McKinsey product, he is parachuting in for personal gain. In a state that values authenticity and blue-collar roots, Buttigieg’s background as a Harvard-educated, McKinsey-trained technocrat could further alienate working-class voters. It is a double helping of ammunition for “out of touch” attacks.

Another problem for Buttigieg is his tenure as Secretary of Transportation. His time in office was marked by high-profile failures and controversies, particularly in areas that matter deeply to Michigan voters.

He cannot play to the inflation angle because of his actions in the Biden administration. During the early years of the Biden administration, the U.S. faced a severe supply chain crisis, leading to shipping bottlenecks, product shortages, and rising inflation. Critics accused Buttigieg of being absent and ineffective in addressing the crisis, particularly after taking an extended paternity leave during the peak of the problem, which comes with optics issues. Michigan’s manufacturing sector was hit hard by these delays. This reinforces the point that Buttigieg was out of his depth in handling national infrastructure issues. Mayor Pete could not level up into Secretary Pete.

Trump & Vance will not let anyone forget another out of touch moment. This one includes comically bad photo ops when he finally did address it. The train derailment and chemical spill in East Palestine, Ohio, became a major political flashpoint. Many criticized Buttigieg for delayed action and poor communication, waiting nearly three weeks before visiting the disaster site. Trump beat him to visiting the site. Since Michigan has a strong industrial and transportation sector, voters may be skeptical of a candidate whose response to a major infrastructure crisis was widely seen as slow and inadequate.

Completing the trifecta of bumbling secretary, no one forgets the weekly airline issues under Biden. Under Buttigieg’s watch, the U.S. experienced repeated airline travel meltdowns, particularly during holiday seasons, with mass cancellations and delays affecting travelers nationwide. His critics argue that he has failed to hold airlines accountable. Did he ever push on Boeing for safety issues? No, that was his job. There were no hearings or even performative angry media appearances.

These failures could make Buttigieg vulnerable in a general election, particularly if Republicans frame him as ineffective, out of touch and inexperienced when it comes to managing large-scale issues that directly affect Michigan families and businesses.

Pete’s biggest weakness may be that he is the polished product of the neoliberal era. There is something off about him. Buttigieg has to deal with the perception that his personality and political style do not fit Michigan’s electorate. Michigan is a state with a strong blue-collar, working-class identity, and successful politicians in the state often connect with voters by demonstrating authenticity, toughness, and a deep understanding of economic hardship. That was Trump’s secret to flipping Michigan versus Romney; he appealed to that voter bloc with his policies, messaging and style.

Michigan’s economy is heavily tied to manufacturing, auto production, and agriculture. This is the same as his native Indiana and he failed there. The state has a long history of electing Democrats who appeal to blue collar voters. Buttigieg has a background full of credential accummulating that is often seen as elite and technocratic. He is a textbook striver, who earns pats on the head but has not actually done anything. He went to Harvard, worked for McKinsey, and has spent much of his political career in academic and policy-oriented circles. He is a wonky, polished phony when speaking.

Michigan, particularly cities like Detroit and Flint, has a significant black voting bloc, which is crucial for any Democratic candidate. Buttigieg struggled with black voter support, a problem that first became evident during his 2020 presidential campaign. He sort of won Iowa. Ran poorly elsewhere. His tenure as mayor of South Bend was marked by racial tensions, particularly over his handling of police-community relations. If he cannot secure strong support from black voters in Michigan, it will hurt his chances in a Democratic primary, forget the general election. Will Trump’s flip of Muslims in Dearborn continue versus Mayor Pete? These votes add up at the margin.

While Buttigieg is from the Midwest, his political style often comes across as more coastal elite. Buttigieg often presents himself as a policy wonk rather than a grassroots fighter, which may not resonate with Michigan’s electorate. He has a smarmy look when in candidate forums. When Beto O’Rourke mentioned going after religious organizations in 2020, Buttigieg dismissed the specific tactic Beto suggested but affirmed attacking churches via their tax exempt status in a smug fashion. He sounded weasley compared to Beto, but the message was a bureaucrat finding a backdoor to attack churches.

He will run. He wants another shot at the presidency. There are paths to it via statewide elections, and Indiana offers no easy path. He does not have the guts for a hard fight back home. Pete shuffled across the state border and believes the Democrat machine will brush away the carpetbagger issues and carry him across the finish line. The problem is, the arrogance to assume that and the arrogance to believe he deserves that seat just paints a giant target on his back.

The post Carpetbagger Pete appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

(Preface: Only a day or two following the ushering in of the current year, I received a welcome phone call from our eldest son, who informed me right away that a main purpose behind his call was to run a new idea of his by me. As it happened, before he had finished with his “sales pitch,” I was already one-hundred percent onboard with the idea, and agreed to “give it a go.” His proposition was simply this: that I write a series of short children’s stories dedicated to imparting knowledge of their ancestors to his children and their cousins (my grandchildren) in particular, but which stories, we both agreed, might also serve the educational needs of Southern children and their families more generally over time.

A few days afterward, I began work on the project, quickly turning out a tentative list of twenty-five (25) stories to write about, and of completing three (3) of the stories on the list. Below the fold is one of those three, written in the style of first-hand stream of consciousness. With the gracious cooperation of our editor, I will be sharing more of these stories at this site in the weeks and months to come, God also willing and all that. And my hope is that y’all will respond in one of two ways or both: (1) that you will offer honest and thoughtful feedback, positive or negative; and/or that (2) you will offer ideas for stories you might like to see added to the list. Which suggestions I hereby promise to take into serious consideration, should or when they come. -TM)

My name is Laura Talbot Galt. I was born September 16, 1888, in Louisville, Kentucky. My mother named me after my grandmother, Mrs. Laura Talbot Ross. My middle name is my grandmother Ross’ maiden name. My grandfather Ross died eleven years before I was born. He was a doctor who treated sick and wounded soldiers in Confederate hospitals during the War Between the States (WBTS).

I grew up on the old family homestead near Louisville that has been in the Ross family since the 1780s. My father died when I was only five years-old, so my memory of father is very limited. His name was John Galt. He was a doctor like both of my grandfathers.

My only playmates when I was a girl were the animals on our farm. My pony, Sadie, was the best playmate I had as a girl; she let me saddle her and ride her anytime I wanted with no trouble at all. I was allowed to read any books in my grandmother’s library I wanted to. I read them all except the medical books that belonged to grandfather.

Among the most prized of all my worldly possessions are the many letters and lots of awards I received from ex-Confederates from almost every state in 1902, when I was only 13 years-old. I shall cherish them as my peculiar treasures always! You might like to know how these treasures came to me. I will tell you the story.

When I was only ten years-old, I began to beg my mother and grandmother to enroll me in the common school in Louisville. I wanted to go to normal school like all of the other children my age. They said no at first, but about the time I turned twelve they changed their minds and enrolled me in the school. My teacher was Miss Allen. She was a plain looking young Boston woman with a strong Yankee accent who was not yet married. She graduated from teacher college in the year 1899.

I was enrolled in school in 1901. Miss Allen gave a history lesson that fall about a subject I had already learned much about from my studies at home. This was the now famous story of when Admiral Semmes did not surrender his sword in defeat to Captain Winslow and escaped capture on the Deer Hound. We were told by Miss Allen that this was a breach of honor on the part of Admiral Semmes, but I denied it because I knew the facts of the case that Miss Allen did not tell in her lesson.

Strange to say, but the story told in our history book did not tell about Captain Winslow firing broadside after broadside into the Kearsarge after the white flag of surrender had been raised by Admiral Semmes. This meant that the breach of honor really belonged to Captain Winslow, and that Admiral Semmes was both justified and right in keeping his sword and escaping capture. These are the reasons I gave to Miss Allen for refusing to say that Admiral Semmes was guilty of a breach of honor in that battle.

When that happened I began to see why mother and grandmother did not want me to go to normal school at first. They were wiser about such things than I was. I was so young and naive that I would never have thought this possible, but they knew that the people who write textbooks and train teachers for normal schools sometimes tell stories that are only partly true, and they leave out facts they don’t want pupils to know about.

In my second year at school, Miss Allen made us memorize the words to Marching Through Georgia, a song that glorifies the cowardly acts of General Sherman and his army in making war on helpless women and children. Reading the words of that song made my blood boil then, and I think that is the reason I had no trouble memorizing it. But when Miss Allen later made us sing the song as a class, I told her I would not do it. She said I had to, or I would be punished. I told her I would rather be punished with a whipping than to sing that awful song. Nor could I stand to listen as my classmates sang it, so I stopped my ears with my fingers and hummed a different song while they sang. I thought it was my duty to disobey my teacher in that case, and to take my punishment instead. I did not get a whipping, but a reprimand instead, which was a serious thing in those days.

To this day I don’t know how, but some newspaper man from Georgia found out about the trouble my little act of duty got me into at school, and before I knew what was happening newspaper readers in every state and territory were learning the facts of the case. A short time later, my name and my little act of duty in school became the gossip of many and “household words” wherever there were newspapers and printing presses to be found ‘from Dan to Beersheba.’

Then letters from old Confederates and Confederate organizations suddenly started coming to me, post stamped from almost every state and territory. I even got a letter postmarked Cornish, Pickens County, I.T. One letter that caused me to shout for joy when I read the return address, came from the John Pelham Camp of the UCV (United Confederate Veterans) in Texas. I even read that one to Sadie because so many times she and I had dashed around the farm, pretending we were in Pelham’s artillery fighting back Yankee invaders of our country.

Besides personal letters, I also got official ones on pretty letterhead telling me I was elected “honorary member for life” by more than a few chapters of United Daughters of the Confederacy. I still have the letters from each chapter that brought me that exciting news that I keep together all in one box. One Georgia chapter of The Daughters even had two special brass medals struck in my honor. They sent two delegates to the 1903 State Reunion in Louisville, who gave me those medals as an honored guest at that reunion.

That is my story of how I came to be so richly rewarded with the best treasures a Southern girl proud of her heritage could ever ask for. Even so many years later, I can hardly find words to express how extremely honored I feel when I look at my letters for the thousandth time. And I think of what those dear old Confederates suffered for the cause they loved so dearly, and yet they praised me so highly for such a little act of duty. They did not know how much pleasure they gave me, for I have always thought of their letters as my most cherished worldly possessions and treasures.

-Laura Talbot Galt

The post Cherished Treasures from My Childhood: Laura Talbot Galt appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The past decade of the alternative media has been a ride, one which at times has been rather harrowing. In the true dissident lane, what it’s not is a job or a grift. If you’re speaking truth to power, it cuts off your ability to conduct financial transactions. You can produce content and do your best to stay on the internet but you’re not going to earn a living in the process. By 2019, just staying on the internet became really tough for us.

Even if you’re merely on the wrong side of power, this happens in America. Some of Trump’s family members were de-banked following his first presidency and even the Jew who owned the Washington Redskins found himself unable to operate an NFL franchise once the name became a target.

It’s impossible to tell the whole truth and stay afloat financially, but if you limit yourself to some truth, you can score big in the supplement game. That’s how entities to the right of Fox News but not all the way over on our wavelength can generate serious revenue. They’re usually selling something with a spurious claim about increasing your vitality or mental acuity. There’s no legal requirement for any of it to be legitimate.

Another business model is based on Zionist and libertarian billionaire patronage, which is why producers of content on the mainstream Right can earn themselves six figures every year for stuff which angers readers to the extent anyone reads it at all. There’s no market for this shit, but one could develop the mistaken impression because it’s out there and people are being paid handsomely to shovel it into the digital void.

A firm, unmistakable, No.https://t.co/BqgNZEE5Ni pic.twitter.com/ryoh9YWPdY

— National Review (@NRO) November 16, 2022

They’re consistent in being totally out of touch with whatever is going on at any given time. In the heady nascent days of the modern Dissident Right, it was really fun to mock and troll these hacks who served as a fake conservative zeitgeist and the arbiters of acceptable conservative opinion. This eventually got boring, and the reality was that their illusion of relevance was maintained because they received lavish funding from patrons but had no actual audience which could sustain a team of writers as if they were salaried white-collar professionals.

A feature long noted is that what they’d endorse as acceptable always moved to align with whatever new insanity was being pushed by the Left. For example, I just went to the flagship publication National Review and the article at the top of the page was: I Joined the Trans Academy. Subheading: Where if you were ‘born in the wrong body’ you can try out a new one… Trump was just re-elected over outrage about trannies and this fresh conservative take is bringing in readers? We haven’t even bothered to mock them since maybe 2017.

National Review attempts to get readers to make accounts in order to read articles. This is partially to impede trolling and criticism, which in those aforementioned heady days vexed them so much they had to shut down their comment sections altogether. The other purpose is to give someone the false impression that readers are why the publication exists.

As it turns out, Politico was doing the same thing except that it was being funded by the federal government under the absurd premise that tens of millions of dollars in POLITICO Pro subscriptions were purchased for employees of government agencies “because it makes them better at their jobs”. I laughed out loud at this one.

The growing USAID scandal has blown the lid on how the popularity of the mainstream media is illusory as well. Immediately after it happened, Politico failed to make payroll. Just a bizarre coincidence, we can be assured. However, it’s curious that this shutdown has hit similar European outlets like a tsunami:

USAID was funding over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 "media" NGOs, including nine out of ten media outlets in Ukraine.https://t.co/tLUoBT2GfNhttps://t.co/Siq2RJOXQf pic.twitter.com/LyaUFuq3He

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 6, 2025

Nothing that the Gay American Empire pushes is genuinely popular with sane, healthy people. Here at Identity Dixie, this has always been our contention about the South. The notion that the South is evil and that America was demanding it be erased as our collective morality matured remains totally absurd. The push to have everything swept away had to be conjured out of basically nowhere because the popular sentiment didn’t exist since there was nothing evil about us.

Mass outrage was astroturfed in the media and then blacks (who didn’t care about Confederate statues or names) and deranged leftists were weaponized to convert this fake popular demand into physical action that intimidated normal citizens. This model of what happened isn’t even unique to our situation.

The same apparatus has been practicing it in Europe as well. Sodomy parades and turning children into trannies aren’t organic national desires that simply arise as history’s long arc bends towards justice. Likewise, having cheap oil and natural gas cut off so that your country can be flooded with migrants and drafted into a war against Russia doesn’t appeal to a general public as there’s no logical reason for this sort of change.

So apparently USAID financed ultra-progressive Politico in Brussels and basically the entire left-wing media in Hungary under the previous US administration. And they called me “disruptor of the year”…

I think the world owes a debt of gratitude to President @realDonaldTrump for…

— Orbán Viktor (@PM_ViktorOrban) February 5, 2025

The good news is that we’re at least watching this apparatus be exposed just as its efforts have been failing. Here in America, they finally had to let Trump win because the backlash would’ve been too difficult to contain a second time. He promptly went on the offensive against USAID without telegraphing his intentions. This is quite impressive for Trump, especially since it played a role in undermining his previous administration. I feel that it’s rather encouraging.

In Romania, the results of a national election were invalidated because voters rejected its agenda. This was done on the grounds of foreign interference from Russia. Objectively this is quite amazing, and the hypocrisy is astounding. The primary international targets of the apparatus, Russia and China, figured out how it operates and banned its cancer cells years ago before they could metastasize.

In other far less powerful nations such as Serbia, Slovakia, and Georgia, it has also been able to stir up massive trouble but at least it has been immediately identified as the culprit. That’s a really significant development and a lesson that had to be learned the hard way.

For instance, I’ve always considered myself far less credulous than a mainstream consumer, but I watched a color revolution unfold firsthand during a business trip to Taipei in 2014 and didn’t even realize how it had been brought to fruition, or by who, until around six years later. These days, I know immediately what’s behind the trouble that pops up in a particular country whose populace is being recalcitrant about the Gay American Empire’s agenda.

Trump’s blow against USAID is a victory for the truth. Enjoy those where you can. In the meantime, I was photographed speeding on a traffic camera and this article isn’t going to pay for the ticket so I’m getting back to my grind. America takes financial bites out of your ass every day and I haven’t even filed taxes yet.

So 90% of "subscribers" to left-wing publications like Politico are fake and "taxpayer funded". And then using fake subs to artificially pump up revenue, Politico gets to sell itself to German propaganda giant Axel Springer for $1 billion. https://t.co/j8wEv5MybL

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) February 5, 2025

The post Always the Dollars appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Regular reader and valued ID commenter, Outside Looking In, recently asked of me (here) which part(s) of my native State comprise the Confederate part(s).

This is a great question I have been asked, and have answered, many times over the last fifteen or so years. However, when I’m pressed for time and/or space (such as in a combox), my answer to the question is always woefully incomplete; it is very simply to procure a map of the state and, beginning at the state’s northeast terminus, to draw an imaginary line from there to the southwest terminus of same. The territory south and east of the line being the Confederate part; the territory north and west (including the panhandle) being the Unionist part of the state.

Now, there is some irregular overlap on both sides of the line in the foregoing demarcation, but the model is nevertheless a close approximation. If you are one familiar with the old pre-statehood (pre-November, 1907) maps of the Indian and Oklahoma Territories, they give an even closer approximation, distinguishing those areas of the state originally settled by Southerners, versus those parts originally settled by their Northern counterparts. On those maps in particular, the Indian Territories previously allotted to the Chickasaw, Choctaw, Cherokee and the Creek tribes, are all Confederate territories for purposes of answering the question.

There are a number of reliable ways by which one may verify this information, one of which is the 13th United States Census taken in the counties and precincts scattered about in Oklahoma in 1910. One column (column #30) on that document having been devoted explicitly to enumerating “Whether a Survivor of the Union or Confederate Army or Navy.” Survivors who served the Union being identified in the column by the initials “Ua” (Union Army) or “Un” (Union Navy); whereas survivors who served the right side of that conflict are alternatively identified as “Ca” (Confederate Army) or “Cn” (Confederate Navy) on the document. County-by-county and precinct-by-precinct examinations of these documents for the State of Oklahoma (1910 Federal Census) verify the lines of demarcation as above alluded to. Here is a sample:

Earl Township, Jefferson Co, OK, 1910

Another way of verifying the information previously given is to examine the list of “Confederate Cards” on file in the State’s Historical Society database, and to compare the locations in the state of the pensioners in that file to the lines of demarcation previously established. A typical card in the file is seen below. I chose this particular card as my example because it was issued in the name of my 2nd great-grandmother on my father’s side of the family, Elizabeth Jane Singleton Pruitt, who received a Confederate Widow’s Pension in Oklahoma from 1924-1941, as entered on the card:

1910 was also the year construction of the Confederate Home of Ardmore, OK was completed. The home was opened in 1911. The home’s location in the heart of that area of the State once commonly referred to as “Little Dixie” is further confirmation of the facts given above. I wrote about the home at this site, October 19, 2020; I later wrote about two of the home’s most active and important benefactors on March 15, 2021, here.

As a crow flies, the home of my 2nd great-grandmother above-mentioned was between five and six miles almost due west of where the Confederate Home of Ardmore still stands, although she was taken care of by family in her extreme old age, and was therefore never an inmate there. A section of Rose Hill Cemetery of the same city (Ardmore) contains the graves of upwards of four hundred (400+) of Confederates and/or their widows who were inmates of the home and who died while residing there. Here is a photo of the home at its dedication ceremonies in 1910:

Forts Washita (Durant) and Gibson, as well as Confederate supply depots such as Boggy Depot near Atoka and Bugtussle Depot near McAlester, etc., also bear witness to the facts previously given. And speaking of McAlester, for many years the town was known as the Capitol of Little Dixie, no doubt due to its central location in the heart of Little Dixie, coupled with its founding by prominent ex-Confederates and their sons. Additionally, McAlester served as the base of operations from which Commander Daniel M. Hailey published the annual Record of Confederate Veterans of the State of Oklahoma until his death:

Of course the number of Confederate graves and those of their spouses and children that grace the many cemeteries within the boundaries of Little Dixie also bear witness to the facts as given above.

There you have it, brothers and sisters, the southern and eastern parts of Oklahoma are in fact Southern and Confederate, by the Grace of God! My eternal thanks to Outside Looking In for the question as he posed it, and to our worthy editor for publishing my answer to the query. If ever I am asked the question in the future, I will simply direct the inquisitor to this article.

God Bless Little Dixie!

The post Oklahoma’s Southern & Confederate Creds appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Father Dabney’s recent article on Trump as a type of Alexander the Great, the last leader of an empire before its splitting apart, resonated with us quite strongly. In our age that idolizes the masses (democracy), the ability of strong leaders to change the course of history is downplayed. But it has been proven through the ages, from Righteous Gideon to Cincinnatus to St Vladimir of Kiev.

There is another saint of Georgia, a holy king named Ashot, who is also a strikingly good example of this. Muslim Arabs had conquered Georgia and were ruling over her people when he inherited the crown in 786. He attempted to drive them out, but was bested in battle and decided to flee. But the Lord’s Providence led to a different outcome:

Ashot was compelled to leave Kartli, and he departed for Byzantium with his family and small army. The refugees journeyed as far as Javakheti in southern Georgia and stopped near Lake Paravani for a rest. But while they were sleeping, a Saracen army assailed their camp. The king’s army was doomed, but “God helped Ashot Kuropalates and his scant army. He bestowed power upon them, and they defeated an enemy that greatly outnumbered them.” The king was deeply moved by God’s miraculous intervention and decided that, rather than journeying on to Byzantium as he had intended, he would remain in the region of Shavshet-Klarjeti.

King Ashot led the way to a renewal of Christian life in Georgia, despite the devastations she had undergone:

At that time southern Georgia was suffering great calamities. A cholera epidemic intensified the struggles of a people devastated by a ruthless enemy. Very few had survived, but that powerless and wearied remnant gladly received Ashot Kuropalates as their new leader, and the king began to restore the region at once.

Ashot Kuropalates restored Artanuji Castle, which had originally been built by King Vakhtang Gorgasali and later ravaged by the Arab general Marwan “the Deaf.” Ashot founded a city nearby and proclaimed it the residence of the Bagrationi royal family of Klarjeti. He also constructed a church in honor of Saints Peter and Paul. As it is written, “God granted Ashot Kuropalates great strength and many victories.”

The region of Klarjeti took on a new life, and through the efforts of Saint Grigol of Khandzta and his companions, the former wasteland was transformed into a borough bustling with churches, monasteries, and schools. Georgian noblemen soon began traveling to Klarjeti to forge their nation’s future with King Ashot and the other God-fearing leaders.

When God grants us deliverance from external enemies, it is then that we must be vigilant against internal threats. St Ashot let his guard down, and because of that his work was undone:

But after some time the usually virtuous King Ashot fell in love with a certain woman. He forgot his honor, his achievements, and his loyalty to God and the nation and took her to Artanuji Castle, an estate that had been built for the queen. Saint Grigol, however, heard about the king’s adulterous relationship and became exceedingly sorrowful.

He repented, but as with the Holy King David of Israel, the damage caused by his sin would reverberate and have horrible consequences for his people:

The king rediscovered his love for God and his country, and he prepared to return to Kartli. But his plans were foiled when a certain Muslim warrior named Khalil invaded, conquering the lands of Kartli, Hereti, and Kvemo Kartli.

Ashot sent his men to assemble an army, but before the troops had been gathered, the Saracens attacked and forced them to flee. The king then traveled to Nigali Gorge with the intent of enlarging his army. Some of the draftees turned out to be traitors, and when the king discovered the betrayal, it was already too late. He hid in a church, but the godless men found him and stabbed him to death in the sanctuary. “They murdered him on the altar, as though slaughtering a sacrificial lamb, and his blood remains there to this day,” writes Sumbat, the son of Davit, in his book Lives of the Bagrationis.

… Venerable Grigol and the Georgian people wept bitterly over the loss of their king and hope. Saint Ashot’s holy relics were buried in the Church of Saints Peter and Paul that he himself had built.

Dixie has a grand tradition of excellent leadership: Francis Marion, N. B. Forrest, Francis Nicholls, and many others. Why does the Lord withhold from us another leader of their caliber who will help us rebuild an independent, Christian Dixie, like St-King Ashot? Perhaps it is our sinfulness: This should always be our first assumption. Perhaps, as Father Dabney said, there are still other preparations that need to be made on an earthly, practical level. Without a clairvoyant prophet it is difficult for us to say with certainty.

Thus, we should do the things we have been told clearly to do: Seek holiness, seek friendship and union with God, love our neighbors and families, honor our ancestors, etc. Let us prepare ourselves as best we can so that we will not delay, but rather hasten, the day when the Lord might grant us a liberator like the Holy Prophet and God-seer Moses. Let us put away any internal vice that might doom us to further subjugation to the Yankees/globalists.

Dimitri Obolensky says something fascinating about language and Christianity: ‘… a language which serves as a medium for the Christian liturgy becomes thereby a sacred language, and… the nation which speaks it is raised to the status of a people consecrated to God’ (The Byzantine Commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500-1453, Praeger Publishers, New York, 1971, p. 334). Our language here in the South has been so blessed, from of old. One can still listen to that liturgical language, like the 23rd Psalm and the Lord’s Prayer, recited in the Old English tongue of many of our forebears if he wants to go back that far in time.

This is a great blessing, but also a heavy burden, for more is required of those who know about the Christian Faith.

As the remnant of a Christian people, then, we await the Lord’s deliverance from our foes, working all the while in anticipation of that day (should He indeed desire to bring it about), as many Christians in the past have done – seeking deliverance from barbarians, from heretics, from Arian Vandals, from Muslim Arabs and Turks, from atheist communists, and so on. Let us do so with humility, as the Psalmist taught us, for this attracts the Grace of God:

But I am poor and needy: make haste unto me, O God: thou art my help and my deliverer; O LORD, make no tarrying (Psalm 70:5).

The post Awaiting the Next Southern Ethnarch appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One of the reasons I tend to only discuss history and current events with my fellow dissidents is that I’m always tempted to bring up a relevant Jew with someone who purports to grasp something that happened and then shut him down when he has no idea to whom I’m referring.

I never do this, but the temptation is always lurking. For example, if someone was explaining World War One or Two, my first query would be about Bernard Baruch. In a country where everything is based on a lie, it might be refreshing to put a dilletante in his place once and awhile.

Since we’ve begun Black History Month, the Jew I’d name is Stanley Levison. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Jewish instrument whose character, intellect, personal life, and ideological outlook would’ve been deeply unpalatable to white Americans. This would include the majority back then who had no experience with black people and looked down on Southerners as cruel and backwards.

Levison acted as King’s primary handler. This is how the Civil Rights Movement, which was actually an operation by Jews to strip white people of their constitutional rights, was sold as something noble. Levison came up with sophistry like judging someone by the “content of their character” instead of their race, which sounded palatable to naive white people who didn’t realize they were targets. King didn’t have this sort of talent, and that’s not what he believed or probably any black people believe.

Behind this malicious movement with a black facade aligned the power of all branches of government, business, and the media. This is how it was forced on white Americans who collectively swallowed it due to the sophistry. Of course, it has not played out as promised over the ensuing decades.

Black people, if left to their own devices, wouldn’t come up with any political movement, let alone a Civil Rights Movements with a specific set of disingenuous objectives aimed at preventing white people from keeping to themselves, advocating for their own interests, and organizing as a group. Hitherto, we’d been both constitutionally and culturally entitled to do so.

Black people didn’t care about white people doing any of these things and probably couldn’t grasp how this would be an unsuitable state of affairs for black people, because in practice it never had been. They certainly couldn’t organize themselves to militate against it, either.

The NAACP’s first president was a Yankee named Moorfield Storey, a descendent of Puritans from Massachusetts. By the time the Civil Rights Movement was set in motion, such functions had been overtly absorbed by Jews. For example, Kivie Kaplan was the president of the NAACP from 1966 until he died in 1975. Basically, this organization was like calling an antebellum plantation a black farming operation. It’s run by black people now since there’s no use for it anymore.

In terms of leadership, the black “leaders” of the Civil Rights Movement wouldn’t stand up to modern scrutiny, but there are plenty of days left in this month. Therefore, on a contemporary note the Democratic Party decided to jettison diversity because it’s in such dire straits over the Trump platform.

Inclusive DNC Chooses White Man To Save Party – And Gun-Grabber Hogg As Vice Chair https://t.co/x38mayMgJI

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) February 3, 2025

What a masculine, neutral character who doesn’t piss off anyone just with his face. The DNC desperately needs somebody to formulate a saleable counter message. I don’t think this is doable since basically everyone wants illegals gone, but success would require someone who doesn’t just regurgitate a failed message. Enter Dr. Black Lady:

The DNC is in shambles… SO LET'S SING!!! pic.twitter.com/TirfGCMZlD

— Andrew @ Don’t Walk, RUN! (@DontWalkRUN) February 1, 2025

She did better than her competition, who told everyone to listen because she was a black woman, just like those BLM coffee mugs from 2020:

I’m watching the @DNC Vice Chair candidate speeches live right now so you don’t have to and I’m laughing so hard. Every other words is about race, gender and sexuality They’ve learned absolutely NOTHING. Every single speech is like this lmaoooo pic.twitter.com/k1yT14Da2H

— Jaimee Michell (@thegaywhostrayd) February 2, 2025

Yeah, this is how a couple of dysgenic white men get chosen to lead the modern Democratic Party. Although, I found this black guy likeable because I wouldn’t be able to do much better if I had to get up on stage and explain some of this wacky shit:

NEW: DNC chair gets confused by his own party’s rules for their “gender balance provisions,” has to hand over the mic to someone else who also can’t explain it during leadership voting.

This is absolutely insane. This party has learned nothing.pic.twitter.com/mK456Gljof

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) February 2, 2025

Real black leaders in America are the guys who dress up in funny costumes and shout at people on street corners about how they’re the real Jews. There was only Obama, he was it at the perfect time. He can’t even do the trick now because that time is long past. There’s nobody else; that’s simply the depth of the demographic talent pool the DNC has its disposable.

Everybody wants the illegals gone, including black people, but the mayor of the Chicago warzone is saying that Trump’s presidency is what it would look like if the Confederacy had won. I’m not a fan of these hypothetical future scenarios, but why would the Confederate capital be Washington DC, and a Yankee real estate hustler as its president?

These black politicians don’t pass any sort of intellectual muster. But, like I said, neither do almost all black people, which is why they have no real political movements or leaders.

CHICAGO MAYOR DEFLECTS FROM ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION WITH SLAVERY TALK—BUT IGNORES REAL SLAVERY HAPPENING TODAY

• What Happened:
• Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson tried to dodge the illegal immigration crisis by ranting about colonization and slavery.
• Instead of addressing… pic.twitter.com/YqPj3oJ3PB

— Shred Newz (@shrednewz) January 31, 2025

At least this political mess is funny. I don’t think the total collapse will be very funny. It actually will probably be quite painful and terrifying. I doubt everything will fall apart this month though, so relax. An airplane could hit your house at any minute, but there’s nothing you can do about it so don’t worry about this scenario, either.

I’ll do my best to devote this month to black people and all of their silly antics. I think the next one will be on OJ Simpson. Have a wonderful day.

The party that whines endlessly about DEI just elected two white, straight (allegedly), privileged, males, Ken Martin and David Hogg, to be DNC chair and vice chair.

Rules for thee but not for me?

At least they don't seem to be tired of losing yet. pic.twitter.com/TDE3tkA2My

— Gays For Trump (@GaysForTrump24) February 2, 2025

The post A Month for Memories appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

…always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect, having a good conscience,…

1 Peter 3:15-16 (ESV)

The first thing to understand is that, when one decides to argue our side of this issue, in public spaces and on social media in particular, (s)he had better be well-prepared and in accord with the spirit of my epigraph. This is because the other side is always lurking and looking to pounce on what they at least perceive to be (y)our greatest weaknesses. Needless to say, if their perceptions are in fact correct, then they will be successful in painting our arguments as being without merit and foolish, and us as ignorant fools. All of that said, allow me to offer would-be defenders of the initiative a few basic pointers.

A common talking point of our detractors on this issue, and the one they are most likely to resort to at the very outset, or very early on at least, is the idea that:

In the debates around the 14th Amendment, the only persons discussed as not “subject to the jurisdiction” were foreign diplomats and “Indians not taxed.”

This is a demonstrably false assertion, but the problem our side too often runs into when it comes up (and it definitely will come up, so be prepared for it) is our side’s general lack of familiarity with the content of the debates alluded to. I will demonstrate that this argument is false below, but I highly encourage you to familiarize yourself with the debates in their entirety as well.

Now, there is not a strict “written-in-stone” order to this; the order the arguments come at you in is of little or no importance; the important thing is your familiarity with their arguments, and the answers to them. Also, I humbly recommend that you take a defensive posture when arguing our side of the question. Meaning, let (y)our opponents follow their natural impulses to be the aggressors, and let it be their choice whatever angle and in what order best to attack you from and with. If you’re prepared, none of that will matter anyway, as already iterated. The other thing is to resist the urge to anticipate every angle they are going to hit you from, and to answer it all in one long diatribe. Oftentimes, “less is more,” so don’t give away too much information at one time as you answer their objections.

The answer to the assertion above-mentioned is that it is simply not true, and we can begin the process of demonstrating this by quoting Senator Howard of Michigan in his introductory remarks, introducing Section I to the full Senate fresh out of Committee. He said, in part:

This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to families of embassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.

Herein lies the wisdom undergirding the “less is more” approach. Not being familiar with the actual contents of the debates themselves in most cases, but more relying on their own circle’s talking points instead, our interlocutors will almost invariably resort to attacking our interpretation of Senator Howard’s statement, saying that his words, “foreigners,” and “aliens,” do not mean what we think they mean, with reasons given. Again, it is important that we allow our opponents to have their say on the matter, before we proceed to deconstruct their narrative.

There are several but equally effective ways of answering these charges, but I will share only one that I use from time to time for brevity’s sake: without citing any sources of my own (i.e. keeping them in reserve for the time being), I will sometimes answer their objections by way of asking them to cite their sources, and patiently awaiting their citations. At this point, they are likely to cite Blackstone, and English Common Law, and that sort of thing. And this is when I will point out that members of the 39th Congress were, well, Americans, and that, as such, they relied heavily on distinctly American definitions of the terms in question. E,g., Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language(more on this later), as well as established American usages, and institutions, etc.

At some point in the discussion, it becomes expedient to “slam dunk” your earlier assertion declaring their continued mistakenness, by the introduction of new (to them) quotation(s) from the debates. Remember, they don’t know these statements are in the debates; they’re relying on, as I said above, the talking points incessantly repeated back and forth within the “academic” circles they fly in. In any case, I will usually cite Senator Trumbull at this point, who said:

The provision is that “all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.” That means “subject to complete jurisdiction thereof.”… What do we mean by “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States?” Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means. (emphasis added)

My approach to this is to let the implications of the contributions of Senators Howard and Trumbull sink in, before I pull out the ultimate “slam dunk,” citing Senator Johnson of Maryland. To wit:

Now, all that this amendment provides is, that all persons born in the United States and not subject to some foreign Power – for that, no doubt, is the meaning of the committee who have brought the matter before us – shall be considered as citizens of the United States. That would seem to be not only a wise but a necessary provision. If there are to be citizens of the United States entitled everywhere to the character of citizens of the United States there should be some certain definition of what citizenship is, what has created the character of citizen as between himself and the United States, and the amendment says that citizenship may depend upon birth, and I know of no better way to give rise to citizenship than the fact of birth within the territory of the United States, born of parents who at the time were subject to the authority of the United States. (emphasis added)

“Parents.” As in the plural. “Who at the time were subject to the authority of the United States.” Now you know why Obama’s citizenship, “natural born” or otherwise, was always a big issue with the “birther” community. But that’s another matter entirely. Or is it?

I see that I am already running dangerously close to exceeding the minimal word count parameters I have set for myself for one article, and that I cannot possibly finish without far exceeding the upper limit (1,500 words), so I beg your indulgence to allow me a second part. We’ll get into why e.g. Webster’s original dictionary, etc., has an important bearing on the issue in part II, but in the meantime I will leave you with Jefferson’s hostility towards reaching back past the American founding to Blackstone et al, in search of answers to internal disputes:

I fear nothing for our liberty from the assaults of force; but I have seen and felt much, and fear more from English books, English prejudices, English manners, and the apes, the dupes, and designs among our professional crafts. When I look around me for security against these seductions, I find it in the widespread of our Agricultural citizens, in their unsophisticated minds, their independence and their power if called on to crush the Humists of our cities, and to maintain the principles which severed us from England. I see our safety in the extent of our confederacy, and in the probability that in the proportion of that the sound parts will always be sufficient to crush local poisons. In this hope I rest, and tender you the assurance of my esteem and respect.

God save the Southland!

The post How to Defend Trump’s Birthright Citizen Initiative, Part I appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Yesterday, among all the buzz related to Canada and Mexico tariffs, Trump began the process of establishing an American Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF). The move was almost unnoticed. In fact, it seems somewhat crazy that the United States did not already have an SWF – but decades of financial mismanagement by the U.S. government played a role. The other reason the United States did not have an SWF is because of the Federal Reserve Bank. The creation of a SWF effectively returns financial power to the American Republic. The following explains what it is and why it pulls power away from the Fed.

Sovereign Wealth Funds are essentially government investment programs – a nest egg of sorts. Every single American state has some sort of publicly funded fund, usually to cover pension programs. Globally, some of the best managed countries (financially) have a SWF, including China, Saudi Arabia, Australia, and Norway – among others. The largest SWF is Norway’s, with $1.7 trillion in assets, the proceeds of which are serving the needs of 5.5 million Norwegian citizens. It should be noted that many poorer countries also have SWFs, often as a means to enrich kleptocrats.

Without getting into the nitty gritty, an American SWF would likely mirror a 401K type investment program. It would hold a mixed allotment of various commodities, stocks, and bonds, which should appreciate year over year through compound interest and earnings. Generally, SWF’s usually only rise – albeit often slowly – because they invest in safer assets, like bonds and commodities (oil, gas, gold, etc.). Stocks are often either a blue-chip variety or a corporate pursuit aligned with a national interest. The managers of the SWF are held accountable based on the performance of the SWF, which generally leads them to avoid personal passions or silly sociopolitical pursuits.

How this is structured would have to ensure that such funding is not robbed by a future leftist president who only invests in DEI, LGBTQ nonsense, or failing green energy schemes. It also needs to be defended from being used as a money pot to increase spending arbitrarily. That can be done, but Trump will need to recruit people who think like leftwing activists to help insulate future abuse of the SWF by another activist presidency. When I did my MBA Capstone project on International Finance, restructured SWFs and fiscal sovereignty for the Republic of Ireland were my two key points back when Ireland was climbing out of a massive post-bank collapse indebted status. The Irish government has since turned one SWF into a social justice piggy bank (something I feared and warned against almost 15 years ago). Thus, Trump will need to really dot every “i” and cross every “t” to ensure that does not happen in the United States. But it can be done.

Now, how does this undermine the Fed? It immediately eliminates the Fed’s monopoly on debt management. In essence, it crushes the Fed by acting as a counterweight to its debt/loan/repayment structure.

For those unaware, the Federal Reserve is the largest holder of U.S. debt in the world. In effect, an unelected American quasi-government agency holds about one-third of our massive debt. The Fed literally makes money on American spending, by charging interest back to the American people. The reason politicians ignore the debt is that they know it is a ponzi scheme. The more we spend, the higher the Fed can raise rates, the more it makes, the more it can re-loan… cycle, repeat. It is a shylock’s dream (look up what a shylock is, and you will quickly see the main culprits).

If the United States has an SWF that is structured to meet some of its budgetary needs (as with Norway), the United States will not need to turn to the Fed as its default move. The money can be withdrawn from the proceeds off earnings, which cuts the Fed out of its loan shark game – or at least diminishes it. By establishing an alternative pot of money, Trump is weakening the Fed almost overnight. In business, such redirected investments protect against hard times and mitigate predatory banking maneuvers. An SWF – if it is built correctly – can do that for the American people.

It is a smart move by the Trump team – if they can pull it off and insulate it from wild leftist pursuits. The latter is easier said than done. One option is to study the investment strategies of Jimmy Patronis, former CFO of Florida, who led Florida to multi-billion year-over-year surpluses without an income tax while crushing BlackRock. Other funds that should be studied are out of the UAE and, of course the most successful of them all, Norway. This can be a huge win for Americans – if the Fed doesn’t kill the idea in its infancy, or the leader who proposed the idea.

The post Understanding Trump’s Sovereign Wealth Fund appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

If you visit Europe, you’ll quickly realize that they’re White and you’re White, but these are people from quite a different place with a different lifestyle. On the other hand, if you visit Australia and New Zealand, you’ll quickly understand that these people are basically living American lifestyles, but they can’t drive on the correct side of the road.

They’re undergoing a mass migration transformation just like ourselves but they’re also burdened with some diversity that was there from the beginning. The last time I was in Australia (their internet blocked Identity Dixie), it was for an industry convention and every single time there was a speaker, they had to acknowledge the wisdom of the elders of the Chungkagunka tribe whose land, despite being nomadic to the point of not even bothering with clothes, that the conference center had been built on.

Meanwhile, they must grapple with the fact that these people are so wise that they need PSAs not to huff gasoline or sleep in the road. Every time anything happens in Australia beside a natural disaster, their wisdom must be acknowledged. I notice everything but Australians seem to tune it out the same way Americans tune out the gruesome drug commercials.

It’s very easy to get down on America after realizing that this might be the most wicked and absurd place to ever exist with the most belligerent and entitled women running rampant all over it, but please bear in mind that things are tough all over. Never lose sleep wondering if our pain will be inflicted on others, it shall. This has been going on for quite some time so don’t feel sorry for yourself.

New Zealand’s Parliament was temporarily suspended after Māori lawmakers performed a haka, a traditional dance, demonstrating their community’s anger and fear over a bill that aims to reinterpret the country’s founding treaty with its Indigenous people. https://t.co/nu55lS7Y8M pic.twitter.com/xLNIkMQagk

— The New York Times (@nytimes) November 15, 2024

I always found it weird that Indians (the red kind) had some special reverence in America, when in the Declaration of Independence, it was stated that having them inflicted on the population was one of their main grievances against royal authority. Our forefathers were rightfully upset that King George III:

“endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions.”

Yeah, so this dispute clearly wasn’t about casinos or the sale of untaxed cigarettes. Anyways, the people in New Zealand think this haka dance thing is really cool and do it before sporting events. What about guns, though? You could shoot them while they’re doing their dance to scare you. Skeleton crews of White people didn’t conquer the New World by accident.

It’s not even the guns. The Spanish annihilated the Aztecs in open medieval battles using knights essentially. The Aztecs were operating some sort of horrific Satanic human sacrifice cult. Likewise, the Māori were cannibals who’d literally eat a weaker group they came upon. Why is there some reverence or sympathy? Objectively, this is quite bizarre.

In terms of objectivity, I’ve dealt with lots of diversity over the course of my life and various dealings. For example, Chinese people can consider a situation objectively. This is why they find America to be so insane at this point. However, they’re mainly concerned with themselves and there’s more than a billion of them in a country around the size of the United States with many more all over Southeast Asia. In terms of genetics and the demographic/geographic situation, they’re inclined towards solipsism.

I speak Chinese and they even distinguish linguistically between vegetables that aren’t of Chinese origin. The notion they’re trying to become the next America and take over the world like Trump’s incoming National Security Advisor claims is farcical and ignorant. They’re building up their military because we encircled them and want to do a regime change and then take Tibet and Xinjiang off of China, dramatically reducing its geographical size and resources. The Chinese actually have other priorities they’d rather focus on.

On the other side of the spectrum, black people are both solipsistic and incapable of objectivity. This makes them like the perfect storm of being unable to figure much of anything out. However, they do figure some things out and I give them credit for doing so.

For example, I was having a conversation with a higher-functioning black person yesterday who remarked that the dysfunction of a particular situation was due to the fact that there were “too many nggas*” with a say in how things were being done. I’d gauge her assessment as correct.

On the subject of Gaza and how more money should be spent on black people in America instead, she observed that this was why Hitler realized he had to deal with the Jews. Her insight was that if you don’t wipe out the Jews, they’ll take everything over with their money and wipe you out. Such musings are coming out of many black people at this late stage. I’m really enjoying it.

WARNING / NSFW Disgraced podcaster Myron Gaines, also known as Amrou Fudl, just unleashed a disgusting, racist tirade against the Jewish community:

– refers to Jews as "fcking fggots"
– claims they are pushing pornography, central banking, & government control
– believes… pic.twitter.com/itB9ePMneg

— StopAntisemitism (@StopAntisemites) November 14, 2024

Blacks have been effectively used by Jews for many years as a weapon against America, but as the entire situation becomes undone, they’re playing a hilarious role in pointing out that Jews are the problem. They only care about themselves, so you can’t make them feel bad about a fake genocide that happened a long time ago.

Due to the characteristics of black people, they are impervious to being made to feel guilty about something so abstract which also had nothing to do with them. They usually just say whatever they feel like saying at any given time.

In terms of White Americans, I worry that my friends with silver oak leaves suffer from a delusion, perhaps one of personal necessity, that the U.S. military is the best in the world and fights on the side of righteousness. This leaves them unable to assess a situation correctly, while someone in the alternative media can look like Nostradamus by comparison despite holding no rank at all.

Pentagon gently leaking to Axios that the Houthis are now effectively in control over the Red Sea. I read from this that they can now credibly attack US navy vessels. pic.twitter.com/8xckBsGJnm

— Philip Pilkington (@philippilk) November 15, 2024

I’ve been saying from the start that the U.S. military would never defeat the Houthis. Meanwhile, they thought that Houthis would be sent packing by “debilitating” airstrikes. There’d be no rational cause for concluding this is how the situation would develop, especially in light of all the catastrophic denouement in Afghanistan and the ongoing modern conflicts in the Middle East and Eastern Europe. They only way to reach this conclusion would be to feel that the U.S. military is the best and we’re the good guys.

I’m not sure we’re I’m going with this; I just had a bunch of scattered thoughts in my head from perusing the news this morning. Everybody is different, so take that into account. I guess that’s my point. Please have a wonderful day and never forget that the total collapse remains imminent. You’ve yet to feel true sensation of fear.

The post Diverse Perspectives appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I always love when I anger both pro and anti-Trump folks. Some think I am far too harsh and critical of Trump. Others think I am some kind of supporter. I assure you that I am not really either pro or anti-Trump because I am a Southern Nationalist. I am pro-White, pro-Christian, pro-Southern, and more specifically, pro-Florida (my home country). I advocate secession. The Union, as it is configured, is a mistake and I wish to see Florida depart from the Union as quickly as possible.

When it comes to Trump, I will point out his flaws. I was once one of his most ardent supporters (2016) – running several pages dedicated to his election and spending the bulk of 2016 on the campaign trail. I was in the Trump Pentagon as late as 2019 (prior to Charlottesville catching up to me). I personally witnessed the chaos of the Trump military. I was dejected at the complete lack of leadership shown by the White House while the DOD ran buck wild DEI and GloboHomo agendas. From 2017 – 2019, the U.S. military began its complete war on White Christians – led by anyone higher than an O-4.

When Trump does something bad for White people or Christians, I will call him out. When Trump does something that harms the South, I will hold him accountable. When Trump makes a decision, an appointment, or a speech – if it is not in the best interest of the White Southerner – I will say so. Blindly supporting Trump is foolish.

Correspondingly, if Trump does something good, I will applaud it. Unlike leftists, I am not against most of that which he says. I am certainly not against his voters, many of whom are my family members, neighbors, congregants, and friends. When he achieves on their behalf, I will praise him. Blindly hating Trump is foolish.

Do I have high hopes about a Trump presidency? No, I do not. I think he will fall into a lot of the same traps as last time – mostly because of his personal style and his outrageous connections to the Jewish people. It boggles the mind when you see Trump’s love of the Jews and “who” led the greatest assaults on Trump: Cohen, Zuckerberg, Zucker, Greenblatt, Oppenheim, Lipowitz (aka, Lorne Michaels), Schiff, Schumer, Vindman, Soros, Lauder, Yellen, Eckstein, Blinken, Emhoff, Tapper, Weiss… the list is large enough to fill a temple in Tel Aviv. I wish Trump would be more pro-Christian instead of pro-antichrist.

If I am wrong, and he does amazing things – great! I will cheer those victories. If he fails terribly, I will hold him accountable for those actions. I will not be a cheerleader for Trump, but I will not be a perpetual detractor, either.

Either way, we still have 2028 coming. We have four years to prepare. Unlike 2016, let’s not fall asleep this time. Let us use these four years to get ready for the sake of our people.

The post About Trump appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

We live under a system which is evil and premised upon lies. It’s therefore impossible to discern any sustainable logic out of it because this isn’t the nature of evil. As the end nears, the script becomes increasingly absurd while occasionally punctuated by reasonable moments such as the 2024 elections. The unsustainability of our situation might be one of the few things to discern with total consistency.

This system uses the concept of democracy to manufacture consent for policies that no average voter desires. There’s no connection between the desires of the electorate and turning children into trannies, mass migration, endless wars to further Jewish ambitions, and central banking. However, through democracy, this connection is implied because its victims can vote.

Under this system we’re also subjected to nefarious Jews whose agenda is mainly to sow chaos. This is how we get Soros buying up DAs to unleash a black crime wave and punish White people forced to defend themselves. These parasites eat at the hull of the ship without regard to how far out to sea the vessel has gone.

These particular Jews can’t even stand the notion that White Americans might feel as if they have a fighting chance. They have a rabid hatred of Trump as a consequence. Clearly, their priorities were sidelined this time around. Soros made enormous investments in races and buying up hundreds of radio stations.

It was all for nothing. Some of his DA candidates even lost in California. Voters were that fed up with the chaos Soros had unleashed and they know to be wary of his candidates now. This is heartwarming, but picture it within the context of global events.

Other Jews can recognize that certain things need to be prioritized, and that there are consequences to consider. Just because they have the power to do something doesn’t mean it should be done. I think that’s what happened with our current elections. A repeat of 2020 when Americans are plagued by mass migration and suffering from rampant inflation wasn’t a good idea. I don’t know how the consensus was reached, but I’m convinced it was decided to let Trump win.

What convinces me isn’t actually their concern over the optics of their actions. This rarely ever restrains Jews as we can see in grim detail with the ongoing genocide in Gaza. It’s the fact that the American public will require a legitimate leader to rally it when a conflict is triggered with Iran that nobody wanted ahead of time, including this particular leader. We’ve seen the maneuver before.

Harris being elected by mail-in ballots after Trump won at the polls on election night wouldn’t be productive for the tenor of public sentiment on such a matter. The side show of Trump next getting sent to prison would also be problematic if a war is underway. This election checks all of the boxes on Trump’s legitimacy for a reason that didn’t exist back in 2020.

So, what happened last week is probably what we would’ve watched happen in 2020 without all the fraud. It was also interesting that none of the pieces were coming out again about how democracy had been fortified. There were a number of simulated exercises as a rehearsal for the screw job ahead the 2020 elections. We were informed ahead of time how those elections would unfold in Biden’s favor.

The NYT explained that Trump would get enough votes to win at the polls and then Biden’s mail-in ballots would arrive, so institutions had been strengthened to suppress outrage from Trump’s voters. That’s pretty much what transpired. Afterwards, triumphal pieces were published about how democracy had been saved.

The fact that none of that stuff was published this time around seemed like a significant indicator that he’d win. Moreover, no major figure is saying he’s illegitimate like they were screaming in 2016. The lack of MSM freakout over his victory because it was stolen by the Russians feels like confirmatory evidence. The script for 8 years is abandoned, our democracy’s greatest enemy sweeps everything, and it’s fine? This must be for a purpose.

War with Iran isn’t another ambitious project like reshaping the map of the Middle East through the Global War on Terror. This is something that will inflict immediate pain on ordinary Americans rather than just the members of the military and their families. Americans don’t buy hydrocarbons from Iran but Iranian sales to other countries are critical to keeping global oil and gas prices contained. It’s the same thing with Russia.

Trump’s plan is basically to threaten both nations with military escalation while squeezing their exports with sanctions and offering American supplies to their importers at significantly higher costs. Somehow, they’ll be forced to comply with ZOG. This seems wildly ignorant of how both prices and production function. Also, that Trump’s targets have been overcoming sanctions meant to collapse their economies for years along with all of the other seismic shifts and cooperative resistance to ZOG occurring on the international stage.

The U.S. military is furthermore incapable of taking down either nation in a conventional conflict. NATO’s weapons and advice have been wiped out in Ukraine and the Houthis have defeated the U.S. Navy. Israel’s strike on Iran with American weapons achieved nothing. Trump’s plans are laughably bogus and amount to grandstanding for an election. Nothing about what he proposes is feasible.

This is where issues must be examined from the necessity of the Zionist project in Israel. Even at the rate things are going with Hamas and Hezbollah, the Israeli state is becoming non-viable. While sustained fundamentally by parasitism, its domestic economy depends on manpower now mobilized by the military and tourism from abroad. With both gone, the effects have been devastating. The political situation is in chaos.

The state of Israel exists because the Jews there have felt mostly safe from the Arabs of which they’ll eventually be rid. As soon as these Jews were in danger, large areas of Israel were depopulated. This could apply to the entire country as Jews utilize their capital and international mobility to leave under the threat of Iranian bombardment. This is all happening right now without a war, and thus Iran has endured enormous provocation to avoid fighting one with Israel and its golem, the USA.

If Israel is unwilling to abandon the Zionist project and the existential obstacle posed by Iran is to be removed, this would have to be achieved by the U.S. military. Everything we’ve learned since 9/11 proves that the U.S. military can’t achieve what the Jews want. Yet it remains the last hope of Zionism.

Trump’s picks on Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense and Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence shows that he now understands his agenda can’t be implemented with appointees vetted through the national security apparatus. However, they’re quite far from Nazis and have nothing against fighting for America’s global dominance.

They’re great for a narrative about how this apparatus has been cured from DEI, though. Americans will need to feel like the military is fighting for them again and we’re pulling free from the cultural miasma into which we were dragged further than ever by the Biden Administration.

Most of the other functionaries around Trump are Jews or their rabid dogs for their agenda, such as the next Secretary of State Marco Rubio. There’s a coterie of them that are downright ominous. Plenty of bad advice will be available when Trump has to avenge some dastardly deed supposedly committed by Iran.

My take is to look at the top prize that Jews need to take from Trump 3.0 and don’t be surprised when some incident he wasn’t expecting outrages the public and leads to the catastrophic conflict with Iran that Jews seem to feel is their last best hope. These elections aren’t about us, just the manufacture of our consent.

You’ll never go wrong with cynicism.

The post Whose Electoral Victory? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

“If centralism is ultimately to prevail; if our entire system of free Institutions as established by our common ancestors is to be subverted, and an Empire is to be established in their stead; if that is to be the last scene of the great tragic drama now being enacted: then, be assured, that we of the South will be acquitted, not only in our own consciences, but in the judgment of mankind, of all responsibility for so terrible a catastrophe, and from all guilt of so great a crime against humanity.”

Alexander Stephens

The second wave of states to leave the Union were the Upper South states. These included Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Arkansas, and pro-Confederate Kentucky and Missouri, who held divided loyalties. The Upper South states of Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas had a more extensive free population than the Deep South and made up most of the Confederacy. In general, there was a difference in the causes of secession between the original seven seceding “Cotton States” of the Deep South and the remaining Upper South. When the Cotton States left the Union, the Upper South either turned down voting on withdrawal from the Union or voted against secession. Historian E. Merton Coulter writes, “The Majority sentiment in the Upper South had been unionist until Lincoln’s call for troops… Upper South… had cried equally against coercion as secession.”

When many historians talk about secession, they almost always ignore the Upper South; they unanimously point instead to the Cotton States. I believe this omission is because connecting slavery as a cause with the Upper South would be much more difficult. Further, looking at their causes of secession exposes the transformation of our Union into a centralized nation under Lincoln.

Lincoln’s Call for Volunteers

“The South maintained with the depth of religious conviction that the Union formed under the Constitution was a Union of consent and not of force; that the original States were not the creatures but the creators of the Union; that these States had gained their independence, their freedom, and their sovereignty from the mother country, and had not surrendered these on entering the Union; that by the express terms of the Constitution all rights and powers not delegated were reserved to the States; and the South challenged the North to find one trace of authority in that Constitution for invading and coercing a sovereign State.”

Confederate General John B. Gordon, Reminiscences of the Civil War

Like the Cotton States, the Upper South saw itself as a collection of sovereign states joined by a contract, the Constitution; if that contract was violated or not upheld, it could and should be discarded. Many believed that peaceful secession would be allowed to occur and that the principles of the Declaration of Independence would be allowed to play out peacefully. DiLorenzo quotes the reactions of multiple Northern newspapers as showing substantial support for secession. Many in the North perceived that this war was one of the self-governing states versus a controlling central federal government. In Lincoln Unmasked, DiLorenzo tells us that before being deported by Lincoln, Northern politician Clement Vallandigham accurately describes Lincoln’s purpose for war:

“Overthrow the present form of Federal-republican government, and to establish a strong centralized government in its stead… national banks, bankrupt laws, a vast and permanent public debt, high tariffs, heavy direct taxation, enormous expenditure, gigantic and stupendous peculation… No more state lines, no more state governments, but a consolidated monarchy or vast centralized military despotism.”

Clement L. Vallandigham

The North’s support for secession was strong before it became clear how much of an impact secession would have on government funding, as the South was the North’s “piggy bank.” Further, free trade policies in the South would dominate the transatlantic trade since the North desired higher tariffs. If the South had been allowed to form their Confederacy, free trade policies in the South would have drawn even more commerce to Southern ports rather than Northern. So, the North would lose the primary contributor to their economic plans, and they would lose out further due to their higher tax rates, and Europeans would trade with the free trade Confederacy. Not a good situation when you are looking to expand central spending.

Lincoln’s call for volunteers to suppress the “rebellion” of the Cotton States caused the secession of the Upper South. The Cotton States felt that the federal government violated their agreement, and the Upper South believed that they had every right to leave, even if the Upper South disagreed with their reasons for leaving. As R. L. Dabney explained, “However wrongfully any State might resume its Independence without just cause, the only remedy was conciliation, and not force, that therefore the coercion of a sovereign State was unlawful, mischievous, and must be resisted. There Virginia took her stand.”

According to many Republican politicians, the Union was not a voluntary contract between sovereign self-governing states governed by a constitution, but rather a centralized nation. Washington D.C., rather than “we the people,” was the authority. The states, the people, were subjects, servants, and pupils of the state. In his first inaugural address, Lincoln said that the Union predated the Constitution. He referred to the Union as a “national government,” and a “government proper,” a “national union.” Lincoln said, “The Union will endure forever, it being impossible to destroy it.” He argued that the Union was not “an association of States in the nature of contract.” His opinion was that “No State upon its own mere motion can lawfully get out of the Union.”

The choice given to the Upper South was clear. They could either remain under the Republican-ruled coercive national government or join the Confederacy, whose Constitution maintained the Union and a compact of sovereign states. On June 4, 1861, The Western Democrat of Charlotte, North Carolina, said the Confederacy was “The only Republic now existing in America.” The old Republic had become a democracy ruled by King Numbers. This was an easy choice for the Upper South.

The Upper South saw Lincoln’s call for volunteers as a violation of the Constitution, a metamorphosis in government, and a violation of their states’ sovereignty. In 1863, the Address to Christians Throughout the World by the Clergy of the Confederate States of America suggested that the Yankees, “Fight not to recover seceding states, but to subjugate them.” This was a war of self-governing sovereign states versus a federal government that was willing to use military force against its own population to keep them under its jurisdiction. The Union was no longer a collection of self-governing bodies based on consent, but a nation controlled by a dictatorial oligarchy. Consent of the governed was eliminated. The Upper South could not go along with what they viewed as oppressive actions by Lincoln and this transformation of the Republic.

“Subjection under an arbitrary and military authority, there being no law of Congress authorizing such calling of troops, and no constitutional right to use them… it is the fixed purpose of the government…to wage a cruel war against the seceding states… to reduce its inhabitants to absolute subjection and abject slavery… Lincoln… is now governing by military rule alone… without any authority of law, having set aside all constitutional and legal restraints, and made all constitutional and legal rights dependent upon his mere pleasure… all his unconstitutional illegal and oppressive acts, all his wicked and diabolical purposes… in his present position of usurper and military dictator, he has been and is encouraged and supported by the great body of the people of the non slave holding States.”

Journal of the Convention of the People of North Carolina, May 20, 1861, pp 11-12

Professor of History at Longwood University Bevin Alexander wrote in his book, Such Troops as These, “Forced to choose between Lincoln’s demand and what they believed to be morally correct and honorable, four Upper South states… seceded as well.” The Upper South refused to become slaves to any government of unlimited power. In State Sovereignty and the Doctrine of Cohesion, J. K Spaulding wrote in 1860, “Hapless would be the condition of these states if their only alternative lay between submission to a self-construed government, or, in other words, unlimited powers and the certainty of coercion.”

“Virginia… was not willing to secede hastily; but the demand of President Lincoln that she furnish troops to fight her sister States, ended all hesitation… preferring to fight in defence of liberty… to place themselves as barriers in the way of a fanatical Administration, and, if possible, stay the bloody effort to coerce independent states to remain in the Union.”

Address to Christians Throughout the World by the Clergy of the Confederate States of America Assembled at Richmond, VA April 1863

Preserving the Constitutional Republic

“All that the South has ever desired was that the Union, as established by our forefathers, should be preserved, and that the government as originally organized should be administered in purity and truth.”

Gen. Robert E. Lee quoted in The Enduring Relevance of Robert E Lee: The Ideological Warfare Underpinning the American Civil War, Marshall DeRosa

“It is said slavery is all we are fighting for, and if we give it up, we give up all. Even if this were true, which we deny, slavery is not all our enemies are fighting for. It is merely the pretense to establish sectional superiority and a more centralized form of government, and to deprive us of our rights and liberties.”

Confederate General Patrick Cleburne, 1864

Lincoln and the Republican Party had transformed the Union from a confederation of sovereign states to a centralized nation controlled by the majority. He endeavored to expand the central government beyond its scope in order to achieve a political agenda. The North had abandoned the Constitution and the Republic and replaced them with a centralized democracy; in other words, a limitless government. The Upper South had no choice but to join the Confederate Constitution, which maintained the “original compact” theory of the Union.

It was believed in the South that it was the North that should secede. Quoting Henry Wise of Virginia, historian James McPherson says, “Logically, the Union belongs to those who have kept, not those who have broken, its covenants… the North should do the seceding for the South represented more truly the nation which the federal government had set up in 1789.” The South saw the growing majority of the North interfering with the culture within their states and violating the Constitution. They observed that democracy and mob rule would take over America. The South wished to restore America to its original Constitution, a Republic of confederated states, in order to preserve liberty and self-government.

“If they [the North] prevail, the whole character of the Government will be changed, and instead of a federal republic, the common agent of sovereign and independent States, we shall have a central despotism, with the notion of States forever abolished, deriving its powers from the will, and shaping its policy according to the wishes, of a numerical majority of the people; we shall have, in other words, a supreme, irresponsible democracy. The Government does not now recognize itself as an ordinance of God… They have put their Constitution under their feet; they have annulled its most sacred provisions.”

Dr. James Henley Thornwell of South Carolina, Our Danger and our Duty

True Unreconstructed Southerners carried no blind patriotism for a tyrannical democracy like “America.” In a democracy, not even the Constitution or the Declaration could protect people from the mob. Decades after the war, Major James Randolph wrote the popular Southern folk song, “I’m a Good Ol’ Rebel.” Here are some of the lyrics:

O I’m a good old rebel,
Now that’s just what I am.
For this “fair land of freedom”
I do not care a damn…
I hates the Constitution,
This great republic too…
I hates the Yankees nation
And everything they do,
I hates the Declaration,
Of Independence, too.
I hates the glorious Union-
‘Tis dripping with our blood-
I hates their striped banner,
…
And I don’t want no pardon
For what I was and am.
I won’t be reconstructed,
And I don’t care a damn

That was the old Southerner. Propaganda like “land of the free,” “home of the brave,” meant nothing to a people who had their government toppled, their self-governance eradicated, and their former way of life destroyed.

Laying Waste the Shenandoah Valley by Theodore R. DavisThe post Part 1: Causes of Southern Secession in the Upper South appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The results of the 2024 elections continue to generate lots of important news stories, but one that has not gotten any headlines thus far really ought to be glaring at us from above the fold: the ridiculous disparities in political power between urban and rural counties (parishes for those in Louisiana).

The attention of most people has understandably been focused primarily on the federal presidential race, so we will begin our analysis of the power disparities there.

Donald Trump won both Texas and Wisconsin – the first by a fairly wide margin of the popular vote and the second by a very narrow margin. But if we look more closely, Trump’s victory was a great deal larger than it appears in both States (all data below comes from NBC News’s 2024 election pages).

In Texas, he won with 56.2% to Kamala Harris’s 42.4% of the popular vote. Yet, Harris won only 12 counties to Trump’s 242 – an astounding difference that is not reflected at all in the popular vote. Trump’s victory in the county totals comes to 95.3% to Harris’s 4.7%. Such differences should be taken into account in State-wide elections (we will enlarge upon that below).

In Wisconsin, Trump squeaked by Harris in the popular vote, 49.6% vs 48.8%. But he trounced her in the county vote, winning 59 to Harris’s 13, making Trump’s county victory in this State 81.9% with Harris taking only 18.1%.

Similarly wide gaps show up in the presidential contest in other States, too – Michigan, Minnesota, Georgia, Oregon, etc.

And this chasm between popular vote totals and county vote totals becomes even more absurd in other State-level elections.

There were a number of ballot initiatives in the States to be decided on November 5th. Those dealing with abortion received the most attention. Because of that, we will limit our analysis of them to the abortion ballot measures.

In Montana, the pro-abortion initiative won with 57.3% of the popular vote to 42.7%, a solid majority. But the initiative actually failed to win approval in a majority of counties: only 24 voted in favor, with 32 voting against, making a roughly equal percentage of counties against: 57.1%.

In Missouri, things begin to look even more ludicrous. A ‘right to abortion’ amendment passed with 51.7% of the votes in favor to 48.3% against. But get this, folks – only 10 counties out of 114 voted in favor of this amendment to enshrine a right to rip apart babies in the womb. Thus, an abysmally small 8.8% of counties decided the outcome on this terribly important issue.

But Nebraska, if one can believe it, is worse than Missouri. The outcome is positive – a pro-life stance prevailed in both ballot measures (glory to God!) – but the influence of just a few counties was almost enough to change that. The right to abortion initiative failed, 51.2% of the popular vote against and 48.8% for. But only 4 counties voted in favor of this initiative vs 89 against, and this nearly brought a win; that is, only 4.3% of counties nearly made abortion an uncontestable right in Nebraska. Likewise with the amendment to limit abortions to within the first trimester: it won, 55.3% to 44.7% (popular vote). In this contest, only 2 counties voted against vs 91 for, which means that an outlandishly tiny 2.1% of the counties put this measure within reach of defeat.

South Dakota, Nevada, New York, and Florida also had striking urban-rural splits on abortion measures.

The old federal provision that counted each slave as 3/5 of a free voter evoked shrieks of outrage in the past. Yet some of the rural counties that we looked at above haven’t even got that much voting power when contrasted with their urban counterparts. In the last ballot measure of Nebraska that was discussed, each of the 91 rural counties had only 0.14/5 of the voting power as each of the two urban counties, a ratio that is much worse than that of the slaves. That is quite a heavy punishment to bear for simply living in the peaceful fields and hollers of the countryside.

With all this mind, it is imperative that two things be done to protect rural counties, the bulwarks of conservative habits and beliefs, from being made totally subservient to their urban counterparts. First, all State-wide elections should be required to gain a majority of both the popular vote and the county vote in order to be considered properly decided (Southerners will recognize this as a variation of John C. Calhoun’s idea of the concurrent majority). Second, cities/urban counties must be rescued from the dangerous, harmful, anti-human, and anti-Christian ideologies that have gripped them and made them useful idiots of leftists, globalists, etc. This will take a firm hand from State-level officials – governors, State legislators, judges, AGs, etc. – but the alternative is to watch conservative Red States be destroyed from within by the evils gestating in Blue counties and cities within them.

Who will lead the way to correct these injustices? The State Freedom Caucuses certainly could. They should immediately make it a goal to implement a double majority rule for all State-wide constitutional amendments, initiatives, and the like, so that a geographically-isolated popular majority can no longer impose their ideological values unilaterally upon the wide breadth of Red counties/parishes in their particular States.

The Freedom Caucuses in Montana and Missouri in particular, States that had abortion measures that would have failed if a concurrent county majority were needed, should be at the forefront of this battle.

After elections over amendments are secured, the double majority rule could then be extended to State-wide elected officials – governor, judges, etc. And lastly, apportionment of electoral college votes for the federal president could be adapted to this principle, so that half of a State’s electors would be given to the winner of the popular vote and the other half to the winner of the most counties.

Whoever takes up the mantle of leadership in this cause, whether Freedom Caucus members or others, we eagerly await their appearance. Normative Christian policies will be too easily thwarted until the double majority is implemented.

The post Obscene Urban-Rural Power Disparities Persist in the States appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

René Guénon is an interesting author. I don’t necessarily agree with all of his theories and ideas, but his writings force those of us living under modernity to challenge our foundational beliefs.

I’m re-reading through one of my favorites from him – The Crisis of the Modern World – and particularly enjoyed his section on agnosticism (and by extension, modern scientism/atheism):

For Aristotle, physics was only “second” in Its relation to metaphysic. That is to say it was dependent on metaphysic and was really only an application to the province of nature of principles that stand above nature and are reflected in its laws; and one can say the same for the cosmology of the Middle Ages. The modern conception, on the contrary, claims to make the sciences independent, denying everything that goes beyond them, or at least declaring it “unknowable” and refusing to take it into account, which comes to the same thing in practice. This negation existed for a long time as a fact before there was any question of erecting it into a systematic theory under names such as “positivism” and “agnosticism,” for it may truly be said to be the real starting point of all modern science. It is, however, only in the nineteenth century that one sees men beginning to glory in their ignorance — for to proclaim oneself an agnostic means nothing else — and claiming to forbid others any knowledge to which they themselves have no access, and this marked one stage further in the intellectual decline of the West.

By seeking to cut the sciences completely away from any higher principle, under pretext of assuring their independence, the modern conception robs them of all deeper meaning and even of all real interest from the point of view of knowledge, and it can only bring them to a blind alley, enclosing them, as it does, in a hopelessly limited realm. Moreover, the development achieved within this realm is not a deepening of knowledge, as is sometimes supposed, on the contrary, it remains quite superficial and consists only in that dispersion in detail to which we have already referred.

René Guénon – The Crisis of The Modern World

Guénon certainly went off the deep end later in his life (he converted to Islam, was provided an Arabic wife by a fellow Muslim, and ended up dying in Egypt after becoming disillusioned with Catholicism), but his work is still incredibly insightful for a modern reader. A good, short introduction to him can be found here.

One reason I enjoy his work is because of those flaws, and that he lived a life inline with what he truly believed. His life is a good example of a dissident that goes insane from a desperation to fill that traditional void that modernity strips from us.

In this particular quote above, he combats agnosticism. Where agnosticism is:

… human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist…

Which is, exactly as Guénon describes it, a glorification of ignorance. He notes that modernity’s obsession with rationalism is a degeneration from a traditional frame.

Even Nietzsche would say that our scientism/rationalism has simply replaced religion, and in practice has become a religion of its own. Nietzsche often said that the Renaissance just switched out one religion (Christendom) for another (humanism). The primary difference is that Nietzsche would not agree with the concept of absolute truth, whereas Guénon spent his life trying to find that truth through Tradition (capital T).

Agnosticism is simply a hyper-modernist rendition of extreme rationalism to the point of absurdity. Guénon demonstrates this in the book by showing that the modern man is so focused with rationalism that he takes it to the extreme of not being able to actually rationalize anything. It transcends religiosity. This happens principally because the modern man has nothing to connect to that is higher or above himself, so nothing can be learned through true metaphysics. Thus, the end of any train of rationalist thought will conclude with an “I don’t know”.

The rationalist believes everything must come from a scientism view. Nietzsche and Guénon are both right in that our modern framework is the worship of human reason (spiritual ignorance and a prideful belief in humanism) which is a degeneration from the past. I don’t agree with the conclusions or solutions from either author, but their analysis of the problem is sound.

Guénon’s work is one of my books in The Recommended Reads section on my website. If you haven’t viewed that list yet, I highly encourage you to do so.

Modernity denies to anyone else the knowledge that any single person can’t figure out. Which is why in our current climate we have no knowledge, or intellectual intuition, or a stable being. We have only confusion and clown world.

But the agnostic would claim that they can’t even know that for sure.

The post Glorification of Spiritual Ignorance appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

This past week, an outlandish story was reported by various news sites that the FBI thwarted an attempted assassination of Donald Trump. The story makes no sense. Summarizing the details, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) allegedly tasked a 51-year-old former Iranian ex-patriot who was previously deported by the United States after a criminal conviction to kill Trump.

I spent almost twenty years in some capacity operating to check Iranian power. I have a master’s degree in Islamic studies specific to Ja’afari Shiism (official faith of Iran). The Iranians have been a focus of mine for more than two decades.

The FBI is lying, again.

It is my belief that the system is trying to manipulate Trump’s narcissistic impulses to get him into a war with Iran. Undoubtedly, the Israelis are helping them. Trump and his team have signaled that they want nothing to do with foreign wars. What better way to suck him into an attack then to try to kill him and his family? The problem is simple: the IRGC does not operate this way.

Sepāh-e Pāsdārān-e Enqelāb-e Eslāmī (official name of the IRGC) is highly sophisticated. They have plenty of well-trained assassins. They are for Iran that which Special Operations is to the United States. They also have a significant diplomatic advantage. Iran enjoys diplomatic immunity by virtue of its United Nations delegation. They can enter and leave the United States at will and by law, they cannot be molested by U.S. law enforcement or intelligence bodies. In other words, they could easily bring a professional “hit man” into the United States with the means to eliminate a President-elect. They do not need to hire a 51-year-old goofball cab driver with admittedly no training.

I find it more ironic that an agency which did everything possible to kill his last presidency and probably played a role in the two assassination attempts on Trump in Pennsylvania and Florida, suddenly saves the President’s life a day after he won by a landslide. The story does not add up. I strongly suspect that the DC beast needs a war for a lot of reasons. What better way to do it than to have the Iranian boogeyman kill a President who is beloved by millions of White men? White men, by the way, who are no longer joining the military, but might, if Iran killed their guy.

No one in their right mind believes that any FBI agent is “good.” You can smell the Satanic sulfur from I-95 when you drive by Quantico. This nonsensical hoax about Iran was likely concocted by the Feds and their Hebrew masters at 3514 International Drive NW (i.e., the Israeli Embassy).

Does Iran hate Trump? Yes. Would they like Trump dead? Highly likely. Would they kill Trump if they could? Maybe. What they would not do is provoke a President-elect whom they fear with a cartoon character of a gunman.

Do not buy another FBI lie.

The post Iran Is Not Trying to Assassinate Trump appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I don’t know about you, but I keep finding articles online and listening to podcasts that regurgitate this idea that “the elite’s Covid agenda failed because the masses raised hell!” or “we stopped the globalists enforcing Covid tyranny!”

It’s a common normiecon talking point. All I can think is… are we on the same planet as these people?

Do they actually think we won? With the vast majority of the population jabbed? With a population that now normalizes such draconian lockdowns over an insignificant problem like the Covid cold?

Nearly every single thing the elites wanted they got. Our elites got the normies completely riled up. Up to the point that they enforced Covid vaccines, got hundreds of thousands fired from their jobs, instilled widespread fear, and normalized such a response for future events.

Contrary to this new imaginary narrative, there were very few widespread protests. And when there were, they almost always got shut down rapidly and violently.

Then, the elites willingly stopped their own covid agenda – for purposes that are not 100% clear yet. “We” sure did not do it. They did.

The elites even created Covid tracking apps as templates. Many countries around the world were already implementing them and their populations were going along with it.

But then our own leadership stopped. They coordinated the stop. Just like they coordinated the start of it all.

Listen, I am not saying that the scientism community stopped. Many of them are still crying about it even today. But they are the intelligentsia. They are not the ones with the actual power. The politburo/isolated class are the ones with the genuine power. They are the ones that winded down Covid worldwide.

The politburo could’ve pushed more. They were in a prime position to do so, especially when the vaccine first came out and fear was at its maximum. But they chose not to. That sure wasn’t because of people fighting back.

I still fondly remember those days. I attended every single protest within 100-mile radius of where I lived. There were never more than a maximum hundred people in attendance (usually far less). Everyone else stayed in their homes and hid. Or complained online and did nothing in person.

Very few exceptions existed; the big one being the Canadian trucker protest. But we saw how quickly the government smashed them when it wasn’t convenient. They could’ve done that to anyone. But they didn’t need to because so few actually stood up.

Australia and New Zealand were magnificent case studies. They had some of the harshest restrictions and some of the lightest resistance. But they still stopped when the rest of the world did.

Frankly, no one knows why they stopped when they did.

My assumption is that Covid was always meant as a test run. To normalize such a response, and to make such ‘martial law’-type responses not seem extreme. Probably for a future event. Something far more serious than Covid, that they also create (no different from Covid).

That is my best guess. I don’t understand why they stopped when they did. From my perspective, it looked like a straightforward route to full totalitarian power. Instead, they held off. Which makes me even more nervous of why. They were waiting for something else.

One thing is for sure, they did not stop because of a widespread resistance movement.

I’m not trying to reduce the efforts of many, especially probably many of my own readers. I know you fought as I did. But we all have to accept that the gray masses did nothing. Because living with that reality is how we plan for the future accordingly.

Creating an imaginary scenario that didn’t actually happen will serve us no good in the future when this happens again.

We have to accept the fact that the gray masses are a lost cause. We will never see a mass resistance movement, unless our guys are at the head of it. Which means we need institutions, organization, and strong men willing to stand up.

Back then, we did not have that. But we are building it now.

Let us work toward this goal and not try to rewrite history to make the situation seem better than it was.

It is a classic motto: remain in our reality or die in your own illusion.

The post The Covid Agenda Did Not Fail appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

As has been covered elsewhere,[1] the Medieval king, as opposed to the monarchs who emerged during the 14th century and the pre-Christian pagan emperors, was quite weak. He was unable to create law, and he was a servant to his people, who owned their customs. The people’s customs and laws ruled everyone equally, including the king, who gained his power and authority from the law. If he did not perform his duty correctly or attempted to expand his authority, he was resisted by all, priests, princes, and peasants alike. He had little control or influence over more than 99% of the population, including his own vassals. He often struggled to maintain his supposed authority over them.

The rulers could not interfere with the rights of the people or manipulate them in any way.[2] Historian Fritz Kern wrote, “The medieval State, as a mere institution for the preservation of the law, is not allowed to interfere for the benefit of the community with private rights.”[3] Historian Régine Pernoud wrote a medieval king “possessed none of the attributes recognized as those of a sovereign power; he could neither decree general laws nor collect taxes on the whole of his kingdom nor levy an army.”[4]

Many kings, even among the most powerful realms, were merely symbols of power. In 1016 a German prelate from the Kingdom of Burgundy stated, “The King has now nothing save his title and crown.”[5] Historians Oliver J. Thatcher and Edgar H. McNeal wrote the Holy Roman emperors “become mere figureheads in Germany and Italy.”[6] The local authorities had become so autonomous of the king that historian Frederic Austin Ogg wrote they “had scarcely so much as a feudal bond to remind them of their theoretical allegiance to the Empire. The one principle of action upon which they could agree, was the central monarchy should be kept permanently in the state of helplessness to which it had been reduced.”[7] At various times in Germany, years passed without an emperor. Other times, the emperor was in Italy neglecting his northern realms or in Germany, ignoring his Italian territories. Likewise, the Doge of Venice “had much magnificence, but little real power.”[8]

Feudal historian Marc Bloch declared France was “in practice almost without a King.”[9] Historians Brian Tierney and Sidney Painter described him as “an almost powerless figurehead in the tenth century.”[10]Ogg called the Frankish king’s power “pitiable and ridiculous” and “insignificant.”[11] Even when the king was a direct lord over a vassal, he often had difficulty implementing his commands; his vassals generally ignored them.[12] Medieval scholar Thomas Madden wrote by the 10th century feudal kings “had almost no control over most of their vassals and therefore could claim sovereignty over only a small portion of their kingdom”[13]Many powerful vassals of France defied the king on his own lands, and without the aid of local lords, Kings often could not travel safely outside of their own territory. Some Dukes in France even barred royal officials from entering their realms. King Philip I could not control even those lords within his own lands.[14]Many French lords didn’t even bother swearing a symbolic fealty to their king.[15]

Thatcher and McNeal wrote, “The authority of the king in the feudal state was very limited. This was due chiefly to the fact that each lord exercised practically sovereign rights over his lands and dependents.”[16]The late Carolingian dynasty and the early Capetian kings of France could only influence a small geographical area. And even within their own lands, they struggled to control lords with castles who openly defied them.[17] It was not until the 12th century the King of France, under Louis VI, was able to bring the royal lands “firmly under his control,”[18] marking a strengthening of the French kings.

Moreover, the feudal king was often not the most powerful lord in his country—he was one among many, and his lordship only extended to his ancestral lands whence he derived his income.[19] Professor Thomas Asbridge wrote, “The titular kings of France struggled even to control a small territory centered around Paris, while the Frankish realm fractured into numerous dukedoms and counties whose power eclipsed that of the royal house.”[20]Thus, a king could not violate his vassals’ local traditions or become tyrannical, or he could face opposition from vassals as powerful as he was—or more so.[21] And these were the very lords he counted on for his troops and prestige. The medieval king rarely could think of expansion because, as Tierney and Painter explain, King Phillip I of France was “completely hedged in by vassals far mightier than he.”[22]In comparison, the US government today directly controls 25% of the landmass, making it the largest landholder in the country.[23]

Ignoring the local Byzantium and Saracen systems, after the success of the First Crusade, Westerners took feudalism with them to the Holy Land and instituted what Professor John L. La Monte believed to be the ideal feudal state; one which like the western realms, had no legislative ability.[24] The King in Jerusalem depended on his vassals for military aid and was under the control of the barons’ court and law derived from customs. The barons would force decisions on the king against his will and interests, even removing him if he refused to obey.[25] Even the kings’ marriages could be influenced and controlled by their own vassals.[26] If vassals believed a war the king waged was unjust or not part of their agreed obligations, they were free not to engage in it. The kings of Jerusalem, like those of feudal Europe, only controlled their own royal domains, while great baronial fiefs and various principalities were governed autonomously, with their own courts and customs.[27]

The King of Jerusalem had no powers in and of himself. He first needed permission from the Haute Cour (High Court) before attempting to take action.[28] Their first “king” Godfrey, refused to take the title of king in the city where the “king of kings” suffered and died. Instead, he was the “defender of the Holy Sepulcher.” In Western Europe in the Middle Ages, Tierney and Painter wrote, “The Latin kingdom of Jerusalem was the perfect feudal state, where the king enjoyed no powers except those given to the suzerain by feudal custom.” Scholar Malcolm Barber wrote within the kingdom there was a complete “absence of any institutional infrastructure,”[29] even operating for a time without coin or currency.

One King Under LawThe Medieval king held less power than any top government position has held at any other time. There was a long period where government interference was at a minimum. Under kingship, the law is the true king. Laws and ancient customs were the rulers, the Grundnorm to which kings and lords had to submit.[30] Law and custom were the two towers of the legal system, not a monarch or a majority of men.

Medievals understood law and justice as deriving from God’s eternal nature. God does not change, and so neither does law, or justice. Like the Ten Commandments, they are set in stone for all people throughout all time. There is no need for the ability to legislate or alter law because perfection is from the past. Any new “law” should simply reinstate the old more perfectly.[31] Kern explained;

Law is old; new law is a contradiction in terms…According to medieval ideas, therefore, the enactment of new law is not possible at all; and all legislation and legal reform is conceived of as the restoration of the good old law which has been violated…the Middle Ages knew no genuine legislation by the State. The ordinances or laws of the State aim only at the restoration and execution of valid folk- or customary law. The law pursues its own sovereign life. The State does not encroach upon that. It merely protects its existence from outside when necessary. Whole centuries elapse without the smallest signs of legislative or ordaining activity in our sense.[32]**

The old law is derived organically from the people and nature. Innovative laws derive from men rather than divine law and thus are invalid. Professor and historian Andrew Willard Jones wrote “A ‘new’ custom was basically synonymous with ‘bad’ custom.”[33] There was no “active” form of government molding and adapting society; instead, it was reactionary. Government and law only came in to render justice after a disruption of the peace. It was anarchistic as there was usually no government. It arose like a wave and then faded until it was needed once more.

Under medieval political philosophy, peasants did not have to worry about incoming rulers changing customs or infringing on their rights. The idea was to “preserve” and “protect” the existing order of the old traditions and laws. Everyone was expected to live under the law; historian Susan Reynolds wrote, “Every ruler…from the emperor or king down to the head of a household, was supposed to rule justly and according to custom. Every unit of government was assumed to be a community with its own customs.”[34]

The oaths kings took at their coronations were not merely religious symbolism but an actual agreement they would serve and be under the people’s customs and laws. Thirteenth century jurist Henry de Bracton wrote “The king himself must be, not under man, but under God and the law, because the law makes the king…for there is no king where arbitrary will dominates, and not the law.”[35] Historian James Morrall described the medieval king and his councilors’ mindsets “as guardians of the law; he and they had as yet no intention of creating new law. Such an intention would have been, from the point of view of these early medieval times, not only superfluous (for if the law is good, why change it) but even semi-blasphemous.”[36] Thomas Becket told King Henry II they should not “consent to any innovation.”[37] Likewise, historian Frederic Seebohm wrote, “Tribal life might well go on repeating itself, generation after generation, for a thousand years, with little variation.”[38] Even King Alfred only “added” laws that derived from earlier laws of previous kings.[39]

No one, not even a king, could be elevated above the law. French philosopher Bertrand de Jouvenel compares a common miller with a king before the law “as far as the miller’s right goes, it is as good as the king’s; on his own ground, the miller is entitled to hold off the king. Indeed there was a deep-seated feeling that all positive rights stood or fell together; if the king disregarded the miller’s title to his land, so might the king’s title to his throne be disregarded.”[40] Professor Hans Hermann Hoppe wrote, “on his own land every free man was as much a sovereign as the feudal king was on his.”[41]

In the feudal order, the king derives his power from the law and the community, the source of his authority. The king could not abolish, manipulate, or alter the law since he derived his powers from it. Unlike monarchs, the king was simply a member of the tribe, given the obligations and duties he owed to his people. Thomas Aquinas wrote, “people are not made for the prince, but the prince for the people.”[42] The various customs called for a king to perform specific duties such as protecting the Church, caring for widows and orphans, ruling justly, protecting his people, and upholding the law. Before becoming king, he took an oath declaring he would honor and preserve law and justice for everyone.[43]

A king had no power to alter the law he was subject to and derived his own power from.[44] The law depended upon the whole community obeying it. For it to be degraded or violated in one instance would destroy the whole law. Thus the tiny encroachments on our freedom we now suffer daily would have been decimated upon arrival by a united medieval society—prince, priest, and peasant all.

Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to GodKings could give commands but not make laws, and if his command fell outside his jurisdiction, he would face “universal”[45] resistance. Under kingship, if a king or lord violates the law and becomes tyrannical, his vassals and others under his authority are no longer bound to give fealty to him. By law, they are to resist him, upholding the law and removing the tyrant. He could lawfully be attacked, removed, and lose his property.[46] If a king were to remove a vassal from his fief unjustly, it could ignite a revolt on the part of his other vassals and the people.[47] Fealty was to the law, not the person. Giving allegiance to a king was giving it to what he represented—to his function under the law.

On Christmas Day in the town of Bethlehem, Baldwin I of Jerusalem was consecrated with oil and crowned king by the Patriarch. During the ceremony, it was announced “a king is not elevated contrary to law…he who takes up the authority that comes with a golden crown takes up also the honorable duty of delivering justice…he desires to do good who desires to reign. If he does not rule justly, he is not a king.”[48] A king acts according to justice and law. A tyrant is not a king and therefore, deserves no fealty, honor, or obedience. He has replaced the law with his own will. Such a perspective stifled innovation (the attempt to legislate, to expand the powers of government). Law had to be both old and just. Any new law declared by the king, unless it was just and conformed with old law, was not binding; it was not law.[49]

If any ruler did not follow just laws, failed in their obligations to their subjects, or enacted unjust laws, then those rulers should be strenuously resisted. A 13th century legal document read “We should serve our lords for they protect us. If they do not protect us, justice does not oblige us to serve them.”[50] Saint Augustine states, “An unjust law is no law at all.”[51] Thomas Aquinas argues, “Every law laid down by a human being has the nature of law only insofar as it is derived from the law of nature. But if in some respect, it is in disagreement with the natural law, it will not be law but a corruption of law.”[52] He further says corrupt law “has the nature, not of law, but violence.”

King Richard II of England, for example, was removed from the throne because he “strove to overthrow the law of the land to which he had sworn.”[53] He disobeyed the law, took actions a king could not legally take, and was imprisoned and replaced. Nobles would simply take on a new king if one became oppressive.[54] Originally leaders of the First Crusade paid homage and fealty to Byzantine Emperor Alexius I. Still, the Emperor failed to support them in their desperate situation at Antioch, and in the Crusader prince’s eyes, they were no longer oath-bound vassals since their lord failed to hold up his end of the bargain.

When the kings of England and France began to tax churches and clergy Pope Boniface VIII condemned their action in a papal Bull as “evil.”[55] But his wrath was not only against the kings but also against the clergy of those realms, who failed to resist the new and unjust action. He condemned the clergy for “fearing more to offend man than God.” They had chosen peace and ease over doing what was morally correct. He threatened excommunication to the lords and the clergy who obeyed the tax.

A lord had to be ever careful, walking on pins and needles, watchful not to offend any custom or rights of his people. Historian Maurice Keen notes there were “endless individual baronial rebellions against overlords who they claimed had oppressed them or had infringed on their rights.”[56] Liberty was worth dying for.[57] A lord could face a duel if he were accused of violating his vassal’s rights—an excellent incentive to keep him from trying to lay aside the law. The tyrant, disregarding law and putting himself above it making his own, incited the subjects’ duty as part of their oath of fealty to resist him when he overstepped and abused his authority.

Who decides if a king or lord has overstepped his boundaries? Kern informs us “The decision of this question rested with the conscience of every individual member of the community,” and “The government had to preserve every subjective right of every individual.”[58] Medievals were individually minded. Aquinas taught “nothing but individuals exists except in idea; the notion that individuality is a delusion is a delusion.”[59] Whether it was education, prayer, relationship with God, or politics, they considered the individual rather than groups.[60]

Our forebears had far greater individual political power than we do today; for example, so long as one resident objected, tribal laws disallowed anyone from moving into their village.[61] Ask a citizen under democracy today about the thousands of laws and regulations he is under, and he can only state a small percentage of them. Under medieval customs, laws were few and lived out. The peasants knew immediately if a lord acted contrary to customs because the issue would not be in practice. It would be “new.” The illiterate peasant knew his entire law more thoroughly than today’s lawyer, who must focus on a specific narrow section of law to master it. Perhaps this explains why democracy constantly creates new and increasingly complex laws—to take away the people’s ability to know if the law has been offended.

Professor Susan Reynolds wrote “Medieval rulers had been supposed to rule all their subjects, and not just their noble subjects, justly and with consent,” but “nothing was so important as consent.”[62] Since the law was personal and consent vital, it was up to each individual to decide if his lord had overstepped his bounds. As the law was made for and by the people not its rulers, every individual in the community had a check or veto on any perceived government intrusion on their rights.[63] Feudal historian Marc Bloch wrote a “universally recognized right of the vassal to abandon the bad Lord”[64] prevailed.Kern wrote, “anyone who felt himself prejudiced in his rights by the king, was authorized to take the law into his own hands, and win back the rights which had been denied him.”[65] He explains fealty:

Fealty, as distinct from obedience, is reciprocal in character, and contains the implicit condition that the one party owes it to the other only so long as the other keeps faith. This relationship, as we have seen, must not be designated simply as a contract. The fundamental idea is rather that ruler and ruled alike are bound to the law; the fealty of both parties is in reality fealty to the law; the law is the point where the duties of both of them intersect. If, therefore, the King breaks the law, he automatically forfeits any claim to the obedience of his subjects…a man must resist his King and his judge, if he does wrong, and must hinder him in every way, even if he be his relative or feudal Lord. And he does not thereby break his fealty.

In 1300 Cynus of Pistoia compared the mutual consent and obligations of a king to his people, to a husband to his wife in marriage. In a letter written in 1020 to William Duke of Aquitaine, Bishop Fulbert of Chartres laid out fealty and feudal obligations. He told the duke besides simply honoring the lord and his possessions, the lord also “ought to act toward his faithful vassal reciprocally in all these things. And if he does not do this, he will be justly considered guilty of bad faith.” If a lord violated his vassal’s rights, the lord’s land he’d delegated to his vassal would transfer to the vassal.[66]

The medieval Church was as obsessed with correct dogma as it was with unity. They believed that the whole system would crumble if theology were allowed to stray in one area.[67] Like the tyrant who oversteps, falsehood must be met head-on, no matter how minor the issue. A ruler was subject to both divine law and those he governed. In the eyes of God, a tyrant is no longer a lord since he has violated his design and is now acting on his own; he has replaced God with himself. Thus the tyrant is no longer to be followed by a Christian people; he no longer has any authority since authority comes from God, who only delegated specific duties to rulers. Catholic author Christopher A. Ferrara wrote, “the worst ‘absolute’ monarchs of Christendom were a model of limited government compared with the presidents and prime ministers of modern secular regimes who owe no allegiance to Rome.” The Church resisted and prevented absolute monarchs from emerging in the Middle Ages.[68] Professor Warren H. Carroll observed “a faithful Christendom can never tolerate an absolute monarchy.”[69] Authoritarianism arose only after secularism began.

The Church hierarchy believed it was their responsibility to protect people from tyrants and also to protect the Church, something they were willing to get involved in “politics” and even wars for. In 1248 Pope Innocent IV declared, “With the help of God I will take my stand for the people, and boldly face the implacable pestilential Prince…to destroy the cause of these evils, the tyranny of that malignant Prince, once emperor [Frederick II] by which the world is falling to ruin, the orthodox faith overthrown, and the glory of ecclesiastical liberty uprooted.”[70]Historian Will Durant wrote, “The power of the Church, said a skeptical Hume, was a rampart of refuge against the tyranny and injustice of kings.”[71]

The great medieval and earlier scholars and Catholic saints like Augustine and Aquinas maintained a higher law existed taking precedence over man-made laws. Any law of man, Aquinas argued, “is beneath the Divine power” and must conform to the higher law. Any law “contrary to the divine law” must not be obeyed because, as stated in Acts 5:29, “we ought to obey God rather than man.”[72] Archbishop Thomas Becket told King Henry II he held God higher than him, “You are indeed my lord, but He is my lord and yours.”[73] Becket informed the king it is best for both of them if he follows God’s rather than the king’s desires. Aquinas wrote when the church excommunicated a lord or he strayed from the faith “the faithful are absolved from his dominion over them and from their oath of allegiance which bound them to him.”[74] He was no longer a legitimate Christian lord but was viewed as a tyrant. The American colonies’ motto of “rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God” fits well here.

A tyrant becomes the enemy of the people, their customs, and God. He is antagonistic to the united whole. In the 12th century, John of Salisbury wrote, “By the authority of the divine book, it is lawful and glorious to kill public tyrants.”[75]He also wrote, “I submit to his power…so long as it is exercised in subjection to God and follows His ordinances. But on the other hand if it resists and opposes the divine commandments, and wishes to make me share in its war against God; then with unrestrained voice I answer back that God must be preferred before any man on earth.”[76] Saint Bonaventure taught that if a lord acts “contrary to God no man may obey him; moreover, since he who abuses the power committed to him has deserved to lose this power, he may be rightfully removed from it.”[77] The Church would dispossess lords of their lands if they did not rule “in accordance with the faith.”[78]The people celebrated their great lords who resisted tyrants, comparing them to Joshua and the Maccabees.[79]

Today, anyone who does not follow a federal declaration is a traitor or rebel. In the Middle Ages, any ruler who went outside of law and tradition was a rebel and traitor and was to be resisted by law. Thus, a medieval peasant would say the greatest outlaws in America were not those of the Old Wild West but are its elected officials and judges of today.

A section of the Declaration of Arbroath reads of tyrants “we should exert ourselves at once to drive him out as our enemy and a subverter of his own rights and ours…for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom—for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.”[80]

Taxation Under Medieval Kingship, any temporary taxes to protect the kingdom required the consent of those vassals paying the tax.[81] Usually, vassals were willing to pay more during times of war so the lord could keep men in the field longer. Certain temporary taxes could be instituted, such as during an invasion as the king raised an emergency tax to fulfill his role as protector of the realm. But as soon as the invasion was over, the tax ended.[82]

However, taxes never reached any levels near modern democracies. For example, the Kingdom of Jerusalem was in a hopeless financial situation. In desperation, the king wanted to impose a “heavy tax”of 2% on high earners and 1% on larger landholdings. This “massive” tax was approved, Archbishop William of Tyre writes, “By the common consent of all the nobles, both secular and ecclesiastical, and by the assent of the people of the kingdom of Jerusalem…for the common good of the realm.”[83] When the Crusader States wanted to raise money to invade Egypt, they taxed only those willing to consent to the tax to fund the invasion. Taxes were perhaps more accurately seen as fundraisers for specific purposes paid by those who backed them.

Taxes were not only temporary but rare; and even here, a modern comparison would be a tax to avoid a military draft.[84]Multiple counts refused to enforceFrance’s first kingdom-wide tax to help fund the Kingdom of Jerusalem in 1166.[85] In 1199, Pope Innocent the Third taxed the clergy at 2.5%, which led to open rebellion.[86]When later King Phillip II introduced a tax (which was agreed upon by the nobles and the Church) within a year, it was abolished, and he was forced to apologize for introducing it.[87] In the 1490s Germany first tried a realm-wide tax, and even then, Bavaria refused to ratify it. Most of northern Europe still had no permanent national tax until after 1500.[88]The level of taxation seen under Roman, Arab, and Byzantine systems did not appear in the West until industrialization.[89]

Decentralization“By the end of the tenth century the kingdom of France remained a legal and ideological construct, but it’s kings exerted little genuine power outside their own family lands. The main political foci were the great counties ruled as autonomous principalities by comital families…linguistic contrasts mirrored different histories customs and laws. The far south retained a tradition of written law…. there was no uniformity of rules of landowning, judicial systems, weights, measures or currency. A kingdom often in name alone.“

-Christopher Tyerman, God’s War: A New History of the Crusades

In a centralized system those in power can become as tyrannical as they like. A 6th century historian and bishop, Gregory of Tours, recorded the effects of decentralization in preventing tyranny. Due to the recent heavy taxation by King Chilperic I “many left their cities and their possessions and, seeking other kingdoms, thought it better to live abroad than to submit to such oppression.”[90] When people have choice they will naturally migrate to a less oppressive system and join themselves to the lords and customs with the most liberty.[91] Thus naturally realms protecting their people would increase while tyrant realms would decrease.

Even though someone might be a king of a vast realm, he may not have influenced the entire area he was “king” of. For example, northern Italy consisted of several autonomous cities and duchies; their “king” ruled a minimal area around the Po valley.[92] Likewise, the well-known and mighty Holy Roman Emperor Frederick Barbarossa controlled only within his family lands in Swabia. The rest of the empire was governed as autonomous realms. Professor Philip Daileader described the Holy Roman Empire in 1273 as a “loose confederation of hundreds of very tiny units, principalities, city-states, and bishoprics.”[93] Historian Will Durant described the same when he wrote, “No German nation existed yet; there were only Saxons, Swabians, Bavarians, Franks…no one system of laws governed the realm….each region kept its own customs and Code.”[94]

Even under Charlemagne, the most prominent early medieval example of a pre-Renaissance monarch, power was limited, and Tierney and Painter wrote, “all the different people of the empire continued to live according to their own native laws. Charlemagne had no intention of abolishing this diversity,” and there was “virtually no public taxation, and Charlemagne depended for revenue on the proceeds of his own land.”[95] A contemporary of Charlemagne was Einhard, who wrote a biography of the emperor. In it, he describes the power of the later Merovingian kings of the Franks;

“The Merovingian family…had long since been devoid of vital strength, and conspicuous only from bearing the empty epithet Royal…There was nothing left the King to do but to be content with his name of King…He had nothing that he could call his own beyond this vain title of King…except a single country seat, that brought him but a very small income. There was a dwelling house upon this, and a small number of servants attached to it, sufficient to perform the necessary offices. When he had to go abroad, he used to ride in a cart, drawn by a yoke of oxen driven, peasant-fashion, by a Ploughman.”[96]

Towns, manors, monasteries, isolated villages, and great dukedoms across feudal Europe were typically autonomous.[97] In 800 A.D., Ireland was made up of perhaps 150 separate kingdoms.[98] At the same date, sparsely-populated Norway was divided into 31 principalities.[99] By 1200 A.D., there were 200 autonomous city-states in Northern Italy.[100] In the 14th century, Germany was made up of 600 autonomous realms.[101] According to Will Durant, Spain was broken down into tiny realms of petty kings, but “even within each little kingdom unity was an interlude; the nobles almost ignored the kings except in war.”[102]

Lords controlled within their own spheres, as did dukes, princes, barons etc, and held autonomy. Each realm had its own laws and courts, and the local village conducted affairs with no control from the King’s capital or a higher lord’s influence. In the thirteenth century, Beaumanoir remarked “each Baron is sovereign in his own Barony.”[103]Historian Régine Pernoud wrote that decentralization provided “variety between one town and another and gave a charming and attractive aspect to the country…each town possessed to a degree which is to-day almost unimaginable, its own personality.”[104] Historian Chris Wickham described the medieval situation as the “radical decentralization of political power in the west.”[105] The people might recognize the king and even honor him, but outside of his family’s inheritance, he could not control anything in those areas. A decentralized kingship should be understood as an aristocracy of sovereign lords rather than a monarchy.

[1] See Missing Monarchy: Correcting Misconceptions About The Middle Ages, Medieval Kingship, Democracy, And Liberty by Jeb Smith

[2] (Pernoud 1950, 78)

[3] (Kern 2013, 185)

[4] (Pernoud 2000)

[5] (Bloch 2014)

[6] (THATCHER and SCRIBNER’S, n.d.-Chronicle of Flanders. (French.)

[7] (OGG, A.M 1907, 409)

[8] (The Chronicles of Venice: How the Doges Were Chosen Eva March Tappan, ed., The World’s Story: A History of the World in Story, Song and Ar 1914)

[9] (Bloch 2014)

[10] (Tierney and Painter 1983, 165)

[11] (OGG, A.M 1907, 105, 173)

[12] (OGG, A.M 1907, 173-175)

[13] (Madden 2005, 6)

[14] (Tierney and Painter 1983, 329)(Davis 1922, 150)

[15] (Tyerman 2006, 16)

[16] (THATCHER and SCRIBNER’S, n.d. -The Feudal System in its Definite Form)

[17] (Daileader, n.d. Phillip II of France)(Durant 1950, 480)

[18] (Holmes 1988, 168)

[19] (Andrea 2020, 137-138)(Wickham 2016, 117)(Singman 2013, 6) (Monte October 10 2014, 171-172) (Chaucer 2009, 13)(Madden 2009)(Pernoud 1950,80)(Tierney and Painter 1983, 99) (THATCHER and SCRIBNER’S, n.d. -The Feudal System in its Definite Form) (Durant 1950, 564-565)

[20] (Asbridge 2005, 4)

[21] (GILES, n.d.[A.D. 1126.] THE EMPRESS MATILDA. )

[22] (Tierney and Painter 1983, 195-196) (Asbridge 2005,6, 57)

[23] (Beisner 2022)

[24] (La Monte 2014, 97)

[25] (La Monte 2014, 95-96)

[26] (La Monte 2014, Intro)

[27] (La Monte 2014, 137)

[28] (Tierney and Painter 1983, 258)

[29] (Barber 2012, 113-114)

[30] (Kern 2013, 70-73)(Hoppe 2001, 268-269)(Jarrett 2007, 10)

[31] (Wickham 2016, 158)(Merkle 2009, 17)

[32] (Kern 2013, 151)

[33] (Jones 2017, 115)

[34] (Reynolds 1996, 36-37)

[35] (Samuel Thorne 1968)

[36] (Morrall 2021, 16)

[37] (Carroll 1993, 93)

[38] (Seebohm 2018)

[39] (Seebohm 1911, 295)

[40] (Hoppe 2001, 20)

[41] (Hoppe 2001, 268-272)

[42] (Pernoud 1950, 82) Also see (Durant 1950, 975)

[43] (Hoppe 2001, 20)

[44] (Kern 2013, 154-155)

[45] (Durant 1950, 566)

[46] (Ross and McLaughlin 1977, 313)(Peters 1989, 38)

[47] (Monte October 10 2014, 65-66)

[48] (Blosser 2016)

[49] (Kern 2013, 149)(Jarrett 2007, 133)

[50] (Weidenkopf 2020, 3)

[51] Saint Augustine. n.d. City of God.

[52] (Aquinas 1265—1273)

[53] (Ross and McLaughlin 1977, 276)

[54] (Morris 2022, 376)

[55] (THATCHER and SCRIBNER’S, n.d. The Bull “Clericis Laicos” of Boniface VIII, 1298)

[56] (Keen 1999, 3)

[57] (Carroll 1993, 360)

[58] (Kern 2013, 185)

[59] (Durant 1950, 968)

[60] (Jarrett 2007, 54-55)

[61] (THATCHER and SCRIBNER’S, n.d. Germanic tribal law early – XLV. The Man who Removes from One Village to Another)

[62] (Reynolds 1996, 240, 317)

[63] (Jarrett 2007, 19-21)(Keen 1999)

[64] (Bloch 2014)

[65] (Kern 2013, 89, 137)

[66] (Tierney and Painter 1983, 163)

[67] (Falco 1964, 126)

[68] (Carroll 1993, 77)

[69] (Carroll 1993, 94)

[70] (Carroll 1993, 209)

[71] (Durant 1950, 817)

[72] (Smith 2023, 116) Also see (Durant 1950, 975)

[73] (Carroll 1993, 77)

[74] (Jarrett 2007, 191)

[75] (John of Salisbury., n.d.,)

[76] (Trewhella 2013, 17)

[77] (Jarrett 2007, 11)

[78] (Carroll 1993, 190)

[79] (“The Avalon Project : The Declaration of Arbroath; April 6, 1320”, n.d.)

[80] (“The Avalon Project : The Declaration of Arbroath; April 6, 1320”, n.d.)

[81] (Hoppe 2001, 22)Unless it was an obligation owed to a king for the property he had been granted, which, as we will see later, was also agreed upon.

[82] (Reynolds 1996, 317)

[83] (Tyerman 2006, 355-356)

[84] Kantorowicz 2016, 284)(England: The Collection of Scutage, 1159-1195, Charters of English Constitutional History, n.d.)

[85] (Reynolds 1996, 314-315)

[86] (Stark 2010 240)

[87] (Tyerman 2006, 391)

[88] (Wickham 2016, 226)

[89] (Wickham 2016, 233)

[90] (Smith 2023, 118)

[91] (Woods 2010)

[92] (Tierney and Painter 1983, 244)

[93] (Daileader, n.d. Emperor Frederick the Second)

[94] (Durant 1950, 665)

[95] (Tierney and Painter 1983, 139)(Peters 1989, 34)

[96] (Samuel Epes Turner, n.d.,)

97(Campbell 2021, 39)(Monte October 10 2014, 100) (THATCHER and SCRIBNER’S, n.d. The Cities of Germany-The People of Cologne Rebel against Their Archbishop, 1074-Confirmation of the Immediateness of the Citizens of Speyer, 1267-Municipal Freedom is Given to the Town Called Ebenbuchholtz, 1201-The Decision of a Diet about the Establishment of City Councils in Cathedral Towns, 1218)

[98] (Wickham 2016, 82)

[99] (Durant 1950, 502)

[100] (Keen 1999, 81)

[101] (Tierney and Painter 1983, 541)(Carroll 1993, 398-400)

[102] (Durant 1950)

[103] (Morrall 2021, 61)

[104] (Pernoud 1950, 61)

[105] (Wickham 2017, 1)

The post The Medieval King: Powerful or Pitiful? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Every dissident seemed to have wildly different hopes and expectations for this election. But now the 2024 election is finished and we know the results. How do those hopes stack up with the new reality?

For me, in a way, I am relieved. If most of us are being honest, I think we would all say that. Some of our Heritage America remains. Kamala was a cackling leftist freak in every conceivable way. Another four years of the Biden protégé would likely destroy most of us (if not financially, then simply in morale).

It is a relief that she is not in. It even feels like a small victory. Maybe Heritage America still does have a chance after all.

But we have to be careful with that outlook. We still don’t know the play at hand.

As I said in The 2024 Election: Final Thoughts And Six Scenarios, a Trump win could led to a worst-case scenario. We just don’t know yet.

The result of this election is a short-term win that could be turned into either a long-term loss or a long-term victory for us.

It all depends on how we respond to it.

If we go into these next four years knowing that Trump is not going to save us, but is going to give us the time to build and potentially slow down the demographic change, then we are going in with a long-term winning mindset.

My biggest fear with this result is that everyone will become complacent once again. I am still jaded from 2016. We cannot allow that to happen.

We all knew that everyone would be activated quickly if Team Blue got in by fraud once again. But that did not happen. So we risk everyone falling asleep like what happened in 2016 once again.

Which is why now, more than ever, we need to be activated.

A Trump win very well could be a gift from God to give us these extra few days during the downfall of the American empire. To give us enough time to get ready. We certainly do not deserve this, but God’s mercy is greater than my understanding. I am staying hopefully optimistic that this is the case.

Granted, I do realize all of this relies on if Cataclysm X does not happen. But hey, if that happens, we won’t have the time anyway no matter who won.

So while I am still worried about the Trump situation, I consider this a minor victory. But that is the case only if our response is to recognize that this puts us in play to get to work. The election of Trump solves nothing by itself.

That is now my hope and desire.

Unrelated, but as an interesting sidenote, this result proves more the massive fraud in the 2020 election.

Just look at this trend. It is impossible in a normal election:

• 2008 Obama – 69.5M
• 2012 Obama – 65.9M
• 2016 Clinton – 65.9M
• 2020 Biden – 81.3M
• 2024 Harris – 66.4M

You have to laugh so you don’t throw your phone/computer out the window.Something like the above has never been seen even in a landslide election.

Newsflash: Joe Biden was not a landslide win. No one was this excited about Joe Biden. It was fraud.

The results from 2024 just add more proof that 2020 was a clear fraud.

Which begs the question, why did they want to keep Trump out in 2020, but they were fine with him in 2024?

So very curious.

For whatever reason, the elites are fine with another Trump term now, even though they weren’t in 2020.

So, I openly admit I am dual-minded here. I am happy Kamala lost, but I think we should stay cautious. For whatever reason, the elites are not upset with this result. That should concern us. Or at least, keep us vigilant.

The post The 2024 Election Results: First Thoughts appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’m a bit ashamed to admit it, but I sometimes find myself browsing Reddit. It can’t be helped as internet forums have largely shut down. Reddit was designed to kill them and replace them. Reddit isn’t monolithically horrible. Whenever the discussion revolves around something that doesn’t directly or indirectly relate to politics, it can be quite informative. The problem with Reddit is that it’s a hive minded collective of leftists that’s full of astroturf and manipulated people. The Federalist recently discovered proof that the Kamala Harris campaign targeted Reddit to the tune of 2,551 posts. People have long noticed, like Twitter prior to Musk’s purchase, that Reddit is littered with bots. Whether it’s a scripted program or a lobotomized individual who faithfully retransmits received messages, it’s true. Dead Internet Theory wins again.

It should come as no surprise that, following the election, the howls of the unwashed plebbitors reached peak levels. “How could this have happened? Nobody I know in real life could vote for Cheeto Hitler! All of the posting here indicated Trump was doomed!” I have to give them credit for the fact that few of them contest the validity of the election and the sentiment of the populace. They are simply baffled that they have so fundamentally misunderstood the notions of the people they’re surrounded by.

Listen up, lost redditor. It’s because you live in an echo chamber. You have carefully cultivated safe spaces, of which Reddit is one, where you never have to confront an opposing opinion. I can reliably guarantee you that anybody you interact with in your normal life and never mentions politics was sympathetic to the Trump platform. This never would have occurred to you. Silence isn’t violence to you. It’s consent.

It’s common knowledge for normal people that people on the Right not only understand leftist positions, but can argue them more effectively than leftists can. It’s not reciprocal. All leftist constructs of a “conservative” are caricatures. Redditors ask why Hollywood has such a tough time convincingly writing villains nowadays with exceptions like the Riddler from The Batman. Because the villains are conservative and the people writing them simply can’t fathom their point of view.

If you are a redditor and reading this, you need to come to terms with the fact that your view of reality came up short on election night. Yes, a lot of dumb people voted for Trump. But a lot of people smarter than you did as well. You could say that it’s because they’re misinformed or evil, but you were clearly misinformed, and writing them off as evil leads you back to where you started. I do believe there are evil people who believe and do evil things. But you’re in the tenuous position of having to maintain that every single generation of humans who lived before the current year were hopelessly and irredeemably evil. Your grandmother who gave you peppermint candy and had some politically incorrect things to say about gays and minorities? Evil incarnate.

That’s not a great way to live, if just for the reason that this gilded age of iPhones and civil liberties came from a tradition of “evil” people. You could argue that it’s been an endless linear march towards progress, but I don’t think you could shake the fact that life’s gotten measurably more miserable despite the “progress” in the past decades. Women have more rights than they’ve ever had, but now they’re continually “under threat.” They’re also not happier. As of 2011, 1/4 of them were on medication for mental health issues. The problem hasn’t gotten better. If things were continually improving, people wouldn’t be so miserable.

The truth of the matter is that you’ve been lied to. You’re upset right now because reality isn’t shaping up to your expectations. But who shaped those expectations? Who made you a pawn? You don’t have many original thoughts, if you stop to consider it. You’re full of talking points, but who gave those to you? I’ll be frank with you in a manner they won’t: a lot of them know the truth. They know the statistics on crime, the dire implications of the destruction of the family, and about the corruption in our political and bureaucratic system. You probably know about the corruption and are fine with it so long as it achieves the desired results.

But the results, so far, have not been beneficial. I could say what everybody says to a redditor. “Go touch grass.” But I don’t think you’ve had a genuinely sympathetic voice in your life for a while. I’m not here to hand you a script to regurgitate to other people. I’m not here to listen to you regurgitate a script you got from other people. I’m here to point out that somewhere on the road of your life, you decided to start doing things other people wanted you to do without considering the consequences it would have for you or others, or if you even wanted to do them in the first place. Maybe you wanted to be liked. Maybe you lacked purpose. Maybe you were bored.

Take an inventory of all of the things you believe most firmly. We already started with the first one: “Trump cannot and will not win the 2024 election.” That turned out to be false, and the people who were hyping you up were wrong and many of them had bad intentions. Go down the list. Think critically about all of the items. Some will be true. You probably care about the environment. Me too. Nobody on the Right actually wants to pave over the national forests and turn them into Walmarts. That’s just another one of the caricatures they made up. I’m not giving you talking points. I’m giving you an invitation to think and take a personal inventory of all of the things you unquestionably accept. I hope it helps.

The post An Open Letter to Redditors appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

“Fundamentally, the western Christian church lost its attempt to control civil society. In justice as well as government, secular authority emerged as the arbiter, guardian and enforcer of law… Christendom was dead… political and civil action now rested with secular states.”

Christopher Tyerman, God’s War: A New History of the Crusades

When the federal government is the ultimate authority, its citizens begin to look to it as a higher power.[1] They look to the government to provide morality, welfare, health, education, financial security, rules, morality, a sense of belonging, and purpose. This mentality has led to what professor Thomas DiLorenzo calls the “deification of the state.”[2]

Since there is now no higher authority, the government also begins to think of itself as a god or, at the very least, they play God. There is nothing outside its jurisdiction. It begins to think it has the answer to every problem and can provide salvation to its people; it begins to think it knows better than its peasant followers and can create its own morality, laws, punishments, and so on. It creates its own thou shalt nots. The state also begins to take what is rightly God’s. Proverbs 3:9 tells us the first fruits of our earnings are to go to God, whereas income tax ensures it goes to our rulers, who demand far more than God ever did.[3] But worse, it will regulate our lives to conform to its beneficent image resulting in more power for itself. Thus, the citizenry becomes docile servants of the state rather than the government being the servant of its citizens. It becomes “patriotic” to be hardworking, taxpaying, obedient tools, to be used for the government’s benefit and thus derive its grace and blessings.

Political participation turns us into little comrades. Followers of Lenin’s ideal “Devotion to the revolutionary cause permeates his entire being.”[4] Politics becomes our most crucial identifier; what we are most willing to go to war for, die for, and dispose of heretics for. For gain, our leaders desire to make politics our most important identifier. We become political beings.[5]

Ask Americans where they get their “rights,” and they will tell you they are from our government. Our kind masters allow us more “rights” than in other areas of the world; therefore, we are “free.” It is a theocracy of statism; every good gift comes from above, and the giver is the government. This is vital to understand, and it is essential you realize your rights come from the government and not from God. The government is your authority; they declare your rights, your values, and your worth.

Secularized citizens believe the collective can do all things through the “government that strengthens them.” Historian Thomas Woods wrote, “The vast bulk of Americans proceed through twelve years of government funded education that (by an interesting coincidence) teaches them all about the wonders of federal government, how lost they’d be without it, and how foolish it would be to worry that the constitution might not authorize most of what it does.”[6] The government becomes the miracle worker; it can turn drought and devastation into abundance and heal disease, starvation, crime, discrimination, and any other ill, real or manufactured.

However, a contradiction arises for the secular state when it teaches relativism and atheism while at the same time trying to teach morals. They first convince the voters they are nothing but random evolved matter living in a purposeless and relativistic world. Therefore, they tell them they must not discriminate against sexual or gender preferences because there is no right or wrong; one way is not better. Yet in the next class they are trained to vilify the Crusaders and the Inquisition and taught a patriarchal system is evil. It seems the only time we are allowed to claim absolute moral right is when something goes against collectivist “democratic, equality values” we are told we can all agree with. However, there can be no moral right or wrong in a secular world.[7] And yet, contradictory to relativism, voting assumes you find something undesirable about the world. You vote to improve your life, or prevent someone from doing something destructive to society. In other words, you’re making a judgment call discerning, one might say discriminating against, one party or person from another. You attempt to segregate them from political participation and representation.

However, knowing people are moral and spiritual beings with an innate perception of right and wrong, secularists must fulfill the need. They will replace God’s law with various secular and political “issues” people are to pretend matter in an otherwise meaningless world. Theologian William Lane Craig explained:

Without God, there is no objective right and wrong… if naturalism is true, it becomes impossible to condemn war, oppression, or crime as morally wrong. Some action, say, incest, may not be biologically or socially advantageous, and so in the course of human evolution it has become taboo. But there is nothing really wrong about raping someone. If… moral rules are, “nothing but the customs… that this or that culture adopts over the course of time,” then the nonconformist who chooses to flout the herd morality is doing nothing more morally wrong than being uncultured. Nor, by the same token, can one praise brotherhood, equality, or love as good. It really doesn’t matter what values you choose, for there is no right and wrong. Moral good and evil do not exist.[8]**

Racism, environmentalism, women’s rights, and so on provide secularists with meaning and purpose. They distract them from searching for the true purpose of life and prevent them from lapsing into traditional beliefs. Democratic societies desire to raise politically active citizens who expect the government to solve their issues. They will then naturally view the government as a kind of savior, a higher power. Over time people will begin to view the government not as a coercive power but as a director, a leader, and a loving mother, a kindly touch. They begin to see anything pulling allegiance away from the government, such as the Church, traditions, monarchy, or family, as sinister. They condemn their followers for praising and adoring these instead of giving what is rightly due to the state.

The environmental religion provides self-sacrificial good works in the way of lower carbon emissions, or riding a bike instead of driving a car. They define sin as eating red meat and driving gas-guzzling cars. Vermont children are more concerned with committing environmental sins than biblical sins, which they have no idea about. The “green” religion provides fear and punishment for non-compliance, such as environmental disasters. Every secular ideology will echo the basic foundations of the religion it has replaced.

Politics often becomes the religion of the secularist. Professor Caplan referred to it as “Democratic fundamentalism”[9] where believers have blind faith in their leaders and overlook and dismiss any criticism leveled against the faith, i.e. democracy. He stated plainly, “political/economic ideology is the religion of modernity. Like the adherents of traditional religion, many people find comfort in their political worldview and greet critical questions with pious hostility.”[10] Voting takes on a religious nature.[11]

Politics and political parties are where the secularist finds his identity, meaning, and purpose; his party becomes his family, his community. From his family, he learns good and evil; to be fully equipped for every good work and maintain orthodox thinking, he gets his daily devotion and sermons from his favorite podcasts and news anchors. Come election time, this secular religionist will be found out in pairs, knocking on doors seeking converts, in addition to tithing to the party of choice. This giving to the “good cause” might not be collected in a basket on Sundays but nonetheless raises millions each election cycle. Values, morality, guidelines, and marching orders are written down as party platforms and talking points to be adhered to by all the faithful. Famous prophets or news anchors receive the admiration formerly due to medieval saints and clergy.

What used to be the most important thing to know about someone—what religion or church they were joined with – is now what their political party is. Politics is the preferred religion of white western atheists. It fills the void Christianity left. In a 50/50 society of Christians and secularists, the latter will outvote the Christians because they will be more politically active; elections are the holy days of their church. To motivate most Christians, you must teach their kids critical race theory or convince them to change their gender behind the parents’ backs.

Janowski identifies more hints of secular religion in what he called “democratic confessions.”[12] He described these acts as a “religious ritual” where the guilty party admits their sin against collectivism. For example, we often see famous movie and sports stars, political pundits, and politicians publicly apologize for saying something potentially disrupting the group. They must feel or express guilt and repentance for their sin in front of the community, and only by performing this ritual to “distance yourself from your former views” can you acceptably repent. Janowski further notes these public displays are only popular in former Protestant nations such as America. They are almost non-existent in the former Catholic nations where confession is done in private.

Democracy itself has religious aspects to it. Citizens are told about its inherent goodness and the evil nature of any heretic who opposes “democratic values.” Opposing those who oppose democracy is not just a form of secular puritanism; in their mind, it is a crusade against evil. They are the inquisitors protecting us from demonic forces. It might not be a witch, but it could be a “climate change” denier, the unvaccinated, aristocrats, monarchists, traditionalists, anarchists, libertarians, creationists or any number of heretical groups. De Chosal wrote, “Democracy is not just a political system. It is much more, and its nature approaches that of the gods if we consider with how much respect it is treated and with what devotion it is honored. The idolatrous character of democracy is clearly seen in the absolute refusal to question it in any way.”[13]

James Stimson wrote, “Democracy is bound up with symbolism, belief, patriotism, and a quasi-religious commitment. It is imbued with our self-identity as Americans. Democracy is the civil religion of America.”[14] Whenever our sacred American idol of “democracy” is under attack, true believers from both the Right and Left come to its defense through military volunteering, donations, the sacrifice of liberty, etc. Interestingly, the Left will say the Right is threatening democracy and the followers aid its defense; meanwhile, the Right will claim the Left is attacking democracy and initiate the same response. Democracy can mean many things. It can be two contrary deities, but it must always be a deity above the Left or Right, domestic or foreign.

We will engage in ideological wars for our god, utilizing our military for evangelistic efforts across the globe to “spread democracy.” Our government spent $787 million on gender equality programs in an occupied Afghanistan not desiring, accepting, or asking for them.[15] This militaristic and evangelistic cause produces large numbers of martyrs. It needs large-scale tithing to maintain, often done willingly because we are spreading (or defending) the societal saving message of “democracy” worldwide. We declare its blessing to the infidel Muslims who, for some incomprehensible reason, won’t accept our enlightenment. In our puritanical minds, we are showing them a better way so they can “progress” (that is, become like us) and receive all the divine blessings democracy so self-evidently produces.

A neighbor of mine viewed the “attacks” on the Capitol by Trump supporters as an attack on democracy itself. At least she realized the elite national party members represent democracy, not the claimed ability to attain self-governance for the voters. She further stated, “democracy is the heart of everything.”[16] We have replaced the savior from Nazareth with the politician from D.C.

In a song by Leonard Cohen titled “Democracy,” he refers to it as the “mechanism of change.” Not just political change but spiritual change of the “heart.” Showing signs of the inherit worship of the state ingrained in democracy, the lyrics read:

sail on, sail on, O mighty ship of state

to the shores of need, past the reves of greed, through the shalls of hate

In other words, democracy can change society and transform the heart past greed and hate; it is a political salvation message.

The old New England puritans were limited to biblical sins (or at least perceived biblical sins such as consuming alcohol) in their pursuit to control others. To the New England puritan (and the hordes of their descendants spread out across the nation), sin comes from the exterior, so, for example, alcohol causes drunkenness. To prevent something you find undesirable in others, you create laws to prevent the outward substance by outlawing it. Puritans’ modern counterparts wage war on drugs or guns, believing their removal would rid the world of “gun violence” and drug abuse.[17]

This is all bad enough, but the problem today is our puritans are no longer Christians. They are secularists. There is no limit to what they will seek to control. They can be poked and prodded into believing in all kinds of secular sins and will then seek to regulate all the exteriors coming with it. Thus, in a democracy, a country of secular puritan majorities will bring nothing but endless legislation, tyrannically invading private property and using force to ease their largely imaginary fears. There’s no limit to the amount of suffering they are willing to force you to endure in order to “help you.”

We can see why governments train up secular puritans and impose on them endless “issues” justifying further control of others. The modern social justice warriors and cancel culture activists are contemporary puritans utilizing the state to enforce their will on dissidents whose secular sins cannot be tolerated. You won’t find forgiveness in a secular religion; they can cancel you for something you apologized for twenty years ago; it is a ruthless religion because secularism does not know the transformation of the heart.[18]

Christianity itself can become not just spineless but a promoter of the state as well. Perhaps the closest thing we have today to an established church is between evangelical Christianity and the Republican Party. Seminaries, megachurches, and so on align with the party, and the churches seek converts (more seats filled, more money, and more voters) rather than disciples. They will preach on the evils of abortion to funnel Republican voters both to their pews, and to the booths. The political party issues become the churches’ issues rather than, as they should be, the other way around. Churches have become just another secular avenue for influencing the population. Very few churches remain unadulterated.

I used to attend a conservative Republican church promoting blind obedience to the state. We recited the pledge of allegiance, sang the “Battle Hymn of the Republic,” and proudly displayed the American flag in the church. There was no shortage of patriotic recruits among the congregation who were, or are, in the military, and they were honored for it, especially on secular Holy Days like Veterans Day. The typical Republican dogma came from the pastor: abortion is murder, military good; therefore, vote Republican, God bless America.

Millions of Christians living in democracies are Christians of the heart, not the mind. They might one day be in heaven, but, knowingly or not, they think like secularists. They are “religious” Christians; they play religion on Sunday but keep it within the church, never bringing it into public view. They are ‘heaven Christians;’ they may end up in heaven, but will never bring heaven down to earth.[19]

Political participation promotes the belief the average citizen’s mission is to save the world through political activism. We are on the mission field to receive the gospel of whatever the current political fad of the day is. Whenever an “issue” and perceived imperfection arises, “we must do something,” and “something” must be government action. We can feel like we are doing something to improve the world only by “taking action.” The Covid pandemic is a classic case; the fear of Covid led to the mentality we must do something; we falsely believe we can control a virus via politics.[20]

In a debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, both candidates claimed they would prevent Covid from spreading. Biden attacked Trump for allowing so many American deaths; voters should not re-elect Trump, said Biden, because too many Americans died under his administration. Biden spoke as a typical citizen in a democracy would, as if it was up to a president to stop invading viruses. And as many Biden critics pointed out, the deaths increased under the Biden administration. Yet I do not blame “creepy Joe” because the state is not my savior, nor am I a totalitarian thinking a president can control a virus. But to be elected to the highest office, you must have that mentality or promise the people you are the savior who can gather the fearful voters as a mother does her chicks and protect them from the fox. Whatever that fox might be.

The lockdowns imposed on citizens by Republicans and Democrats were a severe response to the fear in the population. Governmental action became necessary as the people then pleaded for protection. It doesn’t matter so much the methods are effective, but politicians must do something when the herd is afraid, and they look to you as both your shepherd, and your savior. Neither does it matter if those actions caused numerous detrimental side effects including financial ruin for many and dramatically elevated deaths. Or that more died due to Covid policies than were saved, including millions in the poorest countries.[21] Run it back, and we would do it again, but differently this time.

It seems our solution to Covid did nearly everything possible to ensure a high death rate. We imposed economic suffering; we muted people’s immune systems and their ability to fight it off by removing citizens from fresh air and exercise. We locked them in their houses, reducing levels of vitamin D, a vitamin known to be helpful to the immune system. In Rutland, Vermont, we removed basketball rims because dissidents were getting exercise, and we shut down gyms to prevent the same. Lack of fresh air and exercise lead to diabetes and weight gain. My age group gained an average of around 20 pounds during the shutdowns. Weight is a significant factor in severe symptoms and death related to Covid. Finally, we became dependent on vaccinations and pharmaceutical companies.

Each winter in Vermont, like cozy hobbits, we retreat from the snow and cold into our warm homes. During our withdrawal, we have what is declared a “flu” season and everyone rushes to get a vaccination. People get it and die from the sickness all year; however, the winter’s symptoms are much more severe because our immune systems are down. We are not getting fresh air, exercise, vitamin D from the sun, fresh local food, etc. Our immune systems generally fight off the flu in the summer, but it is far more hazardous in the winter. In other words, we don’t have a “flu season” but a lack of fresh air, vitamin D, fresh foods, and exercise season. We ensured these same conditions during Covid.

[1] (Ferrara 2012)

[2] (Bishop 2023)

[3] (Trewhella 2013, 64)

[4] Victor Cherrnov National Geographic History September/October 2017 Russia 1917 The Year of Revolution Orlando Figes

[5] The medieval peasant did not see it as his role, nor desired it to be so, to bother himself with the troubles of the wider world; his own locality provided enough to concern himself with. Moreso he would never have considered voting or engaging in political activism to bring about social change as he believed it was not worth his time and effort.

[6] (Woods 2010)

[7] (Lisle 2009)(Smith 2023)

[8] (“Can We Be Good without God?”, n.d.)

[9] (Caplan 2008, 186)

[10] (Caplan 2008, 16)

[11] (Lewis 2008, 10-16)

[12] (Janowski 2021, 18-20)

[13] (Buffin de Chosal 2017, 7)

[14] (Achen and Bartels 2016, 18)

[15] (Wolfe 2022, 442)

[16] Tales of Tinmouth Vol 35. Number 2 February 2021

[17] You can outlaw drugs but not the human heart. Likewise you could flood a nation of devout followers of Jesus with drugs but you will quickly discover the investment was not worth the effort.

[18] (Brown 2022, 58-61)

[19] The temple and sacrificial system in the Old Testament intended to make a holy people and priesthood; to bring God down to earth. When God restores the world, it will be here on earth. Evangelical Christianity’s goal is to “get saved” (by a method invented in the 18th century) and get themselves out of here. It is a defeatist attitude; it gives in to secularism.

[20] (“Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus: The Evidence” 2020)(Spira 2022)(“Mask mandate and use efficacy in state-level COVID-19 containment Abstract” 2021)

[21] (Duggan 2022)(“Covid-19 disruptions killed 228000 children in South Asia, says UN report” 2021)(“Drug overdose deaths hit record high | News | Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health” 2021)(Li 2021) (“COVID-19 to Add as Many as 150 Million Extreme Poor by 2021” 2020)(Kompaniyets 2021)(McDonald 2022) (Polumbo 2021) (Duggan 2022) (Balingit 2022) (Cox 2022) (Pearce 2022) (Woods 2020)(“Scientist: 35000 vax deaths, 5000 miscarriages/stillbirths reported on VAERS” 2022)

The post Secular Religions appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One summer, when I was about eighteen, I had the privilege of going on the road with a traveling evangelist, who is still a great friend to this day. In his prime, he was the real deal – an old timey, tent meeting, jump on the piano, and spit into the third-row screamer. The meetings were the kind where the evening offering was taken up by passing a KFC bucket up and down the aisles. It was a fire and brimstone circus, and it was fantastic!

One stop on our summer tour was Madison, Florida. The locals had erected a huge tent, preventing any thunderstorm from dampening the spirit of our traveling carnival of exuberant enthusiastic revivalism. Although, through all the theatrics of the week, which would now make the Presbyterian in me blush, the Holy Ghost did His good work. Many penitent sinners were transformed by the zealous oratory of our evangelist, electrifying that beautiful little community.

In today’s political environment, those memories remind me of the enthusiasm of Trump rallies. There is a certain fervor and dynamism that attracts the masses. The wicked are castigated, and there is hope for a better tomorrow, not just for themselves, but for the Empire as a whole. “Those ole Demon-crats have to be vanquished,” yells the congregants. And Donald J. Trump, the survivor of many fiery darts from those devils, captivates the faithful for hours. There is not a black minister alive that is not taking notes in amazement, and wondering how The Donald gets these White folks to stand up for that long of a sermon.

The final hours of the election remind me of another story from that summer – plunging into the danger of the unknown.

During those hot summer days, before the festivities of the evening services, our team went for a refreshing swim at a local spring. The water was clear and cold, the bottom white and sandy. A rather tall pine towered over the waters, and a ladder of wooden slats ascended up towards a small platform high above the spring. I was all in, and quickly vaulted up to the tiny plank. My heart began to race, realizing my next step would be a testament to the faith of an ambitious and peacock-y, aspiring preacher boy.

The height was greater than I guessed and the water much clearer than I expected. The combination of the two made the spring look empty with only hot white sand at the bottom. But, there I was. There was no going back. It was decision time. I took a big breath, gasped, and jumped, not knowing if it was to my doom or euphoria.

Today, as the polls close, the entire Empire will take a breath, gasp, and plunge into the unknown, if only just for a speck in historical time.

We’ve been here many times, brothers and sisters, and whatever the result, we will endure. For we hope for a home not granted to us by the whims of the changing political tide, but one established for us by our ancestors and Our Lord. Never forget, our goal is a free and independent Dixie. Establish your hearts and minds to that end.

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post The Plunge appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I am a Southern Nationalist. It is my belief that the South is a region comprised of a unique people (an ethnic nation) who deserve their independence from an exploitative and demonstrably Satanic United States. We have no reason to remain in a union dominated by godless states like New York and California. A free and independent South is the goal of every Southern Nationalist. Consequently, when I said that I will not vote for Trump, it was not an endorsement of Harris. It was an endorsement of a belief that the federal government must end as we know it. Florida is my country; Tallahassee is my capital.

That stated, is Tuesday important to me and other Southern Nationalists? The answer is “Yes,” but not for the reasons one might think. Either candidate offers advantages to those of us seeking the end of the United States of America.

If Trump wins – which is highly likely in a fair election – he offers four years of preparatory time for a post-Trump era. His hatred of White Nationalists, especially Southern Nationalists (kin to WNs) is a concern. After all, his DOJ was the most aggressively anti-White DOJ in the history of that agency. But if he really has learned his lesson and will deploy a DOJ that at least stays off our backs, we can prepare for 2029 and beyond. That is a big “if.”

The problem with a Trump victory is complacency. Southerners who advocate for a free South are prone to take an easy way out. They are too quick to believe Trump is a “good guy” who will serve their needs for a more Godly Union. Southern Nationalists have genuine conservative values that they believe Trump shares.

Although I think they are wrong, my sentiment is an entirely different matter. The fact is, SoNats are far too quick to get wrapped up in a false confidence when it relates to Trump. That leads them to take their eyes off the prize: Balkanization and Southern independence.

Of course, Harris disgusts me. She is a sub-80 IQ, indecisive clown who is handcuffed by the genetic limitations of her race. She is not fit to be the assistant manager of a Waffle House, let alone the presidency. Yet, in GloboHomo 2024, she is inches away from the most powerful position in the world. The prospects of her victory should terrify every White person. Her handlers will attempt to complete the end of Western [read “White”] Civilization. That is a benefit to Southern Nationalism.

The gift of a Harris presidency is simple: the gloves come off. Our people will not be complacent. They will not be afforded the opportunity to be complacent. We will be forced to fight back in ways we may not have imagined in 2014, 2017, or even 1861. It may or may not result in violence, but it will finally nail home the need for secession.

All of this leads back to my personal belief that they – call it the “deep state” for lack of a better term – will steal the election again. One can say “Jews,” but that is overly simplistic. The White Race has non-Jewish adversaries, too. Plus, let us be real – no president has been more pro-Jewish than Donald J. Trump.

If I am wrong, so be it. I doubt I am wrong about the attempt to steal the election, if not the result. If Trump wins, we need to be better prepared and positioned to withstand the inevitable onslaught of anti-White and especially anti-Southern government attacks. That is what happened from 2017-2021. Southern Nationalist leaders need to keep their people engaged and alert as to that which is happening around and toward them.

If Harris wins, we need to be ready to pounce on the opportunity it provides to hammer home secession. We need to amp up our rhetorical game. We need to organize and prepare for an American Holodomor, balkanization, and Southern independence.

Either way, the election matters. It just does not matter in the same way other Americans think. For Southern Nationalists, it should be a signal to prepare. Prepare for “what” is the only difference that will be determined this election.

Deo Vindice!

The post Should Southern Nationalists Care About the Election? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In 1946 Texarkana, two Deep South towns situated on the Texas/Arkansas border was basking in the glory of victory (there is both a Texarkana, Texas, as well as a Texarkana, Arkansas, though they will be treated as one city in this article for the sake of convenience). World War II was finally over, and after almost 20 years of depression and war, the city looked forward to a new era of normalcy. The Depression had hit the cotton states very hard, but now things were looking up. They may had lost many of their sons in Europe and the Pacific, but now they were coming home. The future looked bright, and we should all remember that we cannot fault the good people of Texarkana for not owning a crystal ball.

It was in that warm glow of victory when terror struck – on February 22nd of that year, a young couple parked on lover’s lane were attacked, although not killed, by an unidentified assailant wearing a bag over his face. Sadly, it would not end there. As on March 24th, another young couple was attacked, again on lover’s lane. This time, they were killed, sending the city into a full-blown panic. Eventually, five people would die in a series of similar attacks that abruptly ended on May 3, 1946. The fate of the killer, or even his identity, was never uncovered, and although several suspects were named, even historians today have never come close to a consensus on who the killer was, what happened to him, or what his motivations were.

In 1976, thirty years after the Texarkana Moonlight Murders came to an end and the still unknown “Phantom Killer” disappeared as quicky as he appeared, Charles B. Pierce, that teller of Arkansas folklore, made a film adaptation of the murders. The resulting film, The Town That Dreaded Sundown, plays very lose with the facts of the case, but it also stands as his greatest film. The Town That Dreaded Sundown is a lean film that continues the docudrama style Pierce pioneered in The Legend of Boggy Creek. It also includes the best cast Pierce ever worked with, and lovingly designed sets. Pierce is even able to sprinkle in some moments of comic relief that work surprisingly well. We will examine what makes this all so wonderful now. But first and as a point of trivia – as iconic as Jason Voorhees’s hockey mask is, it’s remarkable to reflect on how he didn’t even get it until the third Friday the 13th film. His mother was the killer in the first film (spoiler alert, even though it came out in 1980); however, in the second film, the first with Jason as the killer, he wore a burlap sack on his head, a look taken from Pierce’s film.

As I mentioned in my previous article in this series, when all is said and done, Pierce’s greatest contribution to the art of filmmaking are his contributions to docudrama narration. We’ve become so used to this in the years since, it is hard to understand just how innovative Pierce was in this regard, but audiences of the 1970s during his heyday really had never seen anything like this. And while The Town That Dreaded Sundown employs a more traditional narration than The Legend of Boggy Creek, those docudrama elements are still present, and they help create the matter-of-fact tone that propels the film to great cinematic heights. Vern Stierman provides the narration here, his voice is highly reminiscent of the old newsmen of the 1940s and 1950s, giving the film a somber sense of realism.

Also, of note, is the cast Pierce is working with now. As a regional filmmaker, Pierce was often very limited in the actors he could use. He normally had to use unknown actors, and even sometimes, as in the case of The Legend of Boggy Creek, he had to use non-professional locals as actors. Now, Pierce is able to make this work most of the time, even using it to his advantage, as in the case of The Legend of Boggy Creek, as it further enhanced the documentary aspects of the film. But in The Town That Dreaded Sundown, Pierce is able to utilize a surprisingly well-known cast. Ben Johnson (The Wild Bunch, Major Dundee, Dillinger, Junior Bonner and tons of other great movies) headlines with his stunning portrayal of Texas Ranger Captain J.D. Morales, based on the legendary Texas Ranger M. T. “Lone Wolf” Gonzaullas. Ben Johnson gives the film a sense of gravitas that greatly helps it along and further enhances the sober tone Pierce is seeking to convey. Andrew Prine (Grizzly, Chisum, The Devil’s Brigade) is also on hand as a deputy sheriff and does a highly commendable job. Perhaps, the most surprising performance belongs to Dawn Wells. She was far more prolific than she’s remembered as being, but as most people, I am primarily familiar with her thanks to Gilligan’s Island. So, to see her in this, let alone playing a victim, is a bit jarring, but it does demonstrate that she is a far better actress than she’s commonly given credit for.

Despite pioneering the docudrama style of filmmaking, Pierce is well-known for sprinkling his films with humor, the results of which would become decidedly mixed as his career declined in the 1980s. The Town That Dreaded Sundown is the film in which Pierce’s humor works best, with several legitimately funny moments. These moments help lighten the mood in what is otherwise a very serious and dreary picture. Pierce even shows an ability to make himself a fool as he casts himself as the major comic relief character – the bumbling deputy, A.C. “Sparkplug” Benson. His character feels like a less entitled, though no more intelligent, predecessor to Junior Justice (Mike Henry) from Smokey and the Bandit.

As with The Legend of Boggy Creek, The Town That Dreaded Sundown suffered during the home video era. While it was widely assumed, until recently, that The Legend of Boggy Creek has fallen into public domain, allowing the market to be flooded with cheap copies sourced from a VHS, The Town That Dreaded Sundown had the opposite problem, it just wasn’t released for years, only receiving sporadic VHS releases and not receiving a DVD or Blu-Ray until 2013. Thankfully, it was eventually released, and the film now looks amazing, allowing Pierce’s technical skills as a filmmaker to shine. As a result, the stock of this film has been steadily rising over the past several years. Texarkana has taken to embracing the film as well, with public showings of it every October, an event which I sadly have yet to attend.

The post Dixie’s Scorsese: The Films of Charles B. Pierce, Part III: The Town That Dreaded Sundown appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I recently came across a story about a woman named Marijuana Pepsi Vandyck. Mrs. Vandyck indicated in the story she did not want to change her name despite its patent ridiculousness. The article notes that she has a PhD in Higher Educational Leadership and works at the Community College of Baltimore County while also running “Action as Empowerment Center for Change.” She’s since moved on to work at Beloit College, where she directs a program for “first-generation, disabled and low-income students” and owns a “Performance Coaching Agency” as well. I’m unsure why she felt the need to render the type of agency as a proper noun.

Mrs. Vandyck wrote her doctoral dissertation on the discrimination that blacks face in education due to their unconventional names. This should strike anybody as obvious to the point it requires no explanation, let alone doctoral probing. While racial blank-slate-ism is the uncontested truth of the age, we still tend to accept that intelligence is up to 80% heritable from parents to offspring. The apple that fell off the illiterate tree is probably illiterate itself. This woman of questionable literacy is apparently famous enough, due to her highly unorthodox name, to warrant her own wikipedia article. I suppose her mother was correct when she told her that her, “name will take [her] around the world.”

How this woman’s doctoral inquiry relates to “leadership” is anyone’s guess. She’d have been better off peddling it in the sociology department, although I suppose one must still maintain a rudimentary understanding of statistics to practice sociology. Regardless, her adviser greenlit her research and Cardinal Stritch University approved it and gave her the coveted final sheepskin, presumably after she defended her thesis.

If the background of Mrs. Vandyck’s PhD strikes you as strange, join the club. It almost makes one yearn for the times when a PhD in “Education” was the laughingstock of the other non-medical doctors of academia. Yet, these odd fields have ballooned in quantity due to the lack of rigor in the programs and the dearth of intellectual capacity in the students.

Modern higher education is a complex game of “Monkey-See-Monkey-Do,” operating in parallel with the full Oscar Wilde quote that, “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery that mediocrity can pay to greatness.” It’s beyond question that the current crop of PhDs in the humanities are woefully mediocre intellects. A lot of them have even snuck into the sciences by getting stealth-humanities degrees in scientific fields such as “Computer Programming Management.”

These midwits would be bad enough if they were allowed to spout their half-baked ideas while waving their sheepskins around. But, if they had to explain their pedestrian views on the world in plain English, they’d find that most people not only easily understand the “insights” they painstakingly came to over the course of a masters and perhaps PhD program, but they can handily disprove them.

Academics in prior ages, or in rigorous “right answer/wrong answer” fields in modern times, don’t suffer from this constant humiliation. The midwit is forced to ponder why. The midwit finds Hegel and Heisenberg equally incomprehensible, yet lauded by academics and respected by the public (once their achievements have been explained to the average person). In fact, all of the bona fide intellectuals and their work are baffling to midwits and to the majority of the public. This stems from the complexity of their work. Complex ideas have complex explanations. The layman isn’t equipped to debate particle physics. Particle physicists find themselves generally unopposed (except by other particle physicists) when they present their findings about the world. Nobody contests their intellect.

And so, the midwit decides to make her work as incomprehensible and convoluted as possible. The problem is that none of her ideas are complex. In fact, the ideas are so ubiquitous and so transparently “obvious” that they’re the basis for all modern entertainment. One can understand Whig history in five minutes. The midwit has to find a way to dress up the Rousseauian [1] view of nature (don’t credit her with having read and understood Rousseau… she didn’t. She just copped the general idea from Eat, Pray, Love) in a way that makes peoples’ eyes glaze over and leads them to scratch their heads in confusion. After all, that’s the way she felt when she attempted to wrestle with actual intellectuals.

She starts making up or misusing words and using punctuation in ways that make sentences look like abstract algebraic equations. This is how you get papers like “Frag(men)tation: a Sym*bolic Dialectic Dis-cursive Analytica of Patriarchy’s Problemizing Role in Plate Tectonics.” If you manage to get a few paragraphs into what the Z Man refers to as “Xirl Science,” you’ll walk away with the notion that not only do you have no idea what the xirl is communicating in her work — but she doesn’t either.

I haven’t read Mrs. Vandyck’s dissertation. For all I know, it’s written in the classical style and comprehensible with a single and moderately brief reading by intelligent people. She is, however, part of the crop of pseudo-intellectuals who have relied on credentialism in lieu of intelligence and achievement. Her day job consists of elevating other non-aptitudinal students up the great pyramid scheme of higher education. Even if she doesn’t write like an ADHD-addled simpleton with a stuck hyphen key, the dullards she’s aiding in their educational journeys certainly will, at least if they want their musings published in contemporary publications.

As our university system continues to bleed credibility, I suppose one can take solace in the fact that the public is as unimpressed as the rest of us and that the only people who find the psychobabble permeating the humanities compelling are people who generate the psychobabble itself.

[1] Squaring the Whiggish march of progress with Rousseau’s contention that natural man has been degrading since he abandoned savagery sounds like a very difficult endeavor, but we tend to underestimate the capacity for cognitive dissonance in the thoroughly propagandized masses. Leftists all believe the savages of the Earth are more moral people than we are due to their closeness to nature while simultaneously believing that we are morally superior to the people of the 1950s (and the 1850s, and the 1050s) due to our perfection of liberal democracy and technological wonders.

The post De-Mystifying Modern Aca(DEM)ia: A Case Study in Chronic Soft Drinks appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Kaiser’s recent article, “The Difficulty in Keeping Dissidents Engaged” and the others he links to are important reads and especially for how to understand friends and family who may be maturing past the normie stage of accepting the civic myths and origin stories that are created and strenuously reinforced to maintain social cohesion.

There are two profiles that I think are worth addressing as to why the lifespan of a dissident is so short for most and why a minority who remain outside the mainstream become useless. Those that do keep their wits and remain effective are also a minority and Kaiser explains well the profile necessary to be in this third smaller group.

Normie Dissident

When normal people (people who behave, vote, work, have families, go to church, consume non toxic levels of mainstream pop culture), begin questioning the status quo and then entertain rejecting the establishment, the motivation is not to tear down and revolt. It is a reaction born out of a sense of betrayal and injustice by an authority they want to believe in and with an urgency to “do something” to quickly restore order and normalcy. This is entirely different from what drives leftists with true revolutionary mindsets and a true dissident.

These are people who fundamentally believe that restoring the system is possible and desirable. Accepting the total depravity of the State and its fraudulent history is not possible because their identity is too intertwined with being a loyal citizen. Like teens who try on different attitudes and looks, the normie dissident may sample and larp in edgy ways for a while, but truly abandoning the powerful lure of security they believed they enjoyed when “things were right” in exchange for the vilified and uncertain future of the dissident is not a commitment they can make. The idea is terrifying for them.

This is where the clever grifters find their audience. They repeat the colorful and sensational from true dissident voices but never advocate their solutions or support the obvious conclusions. Some are clearly and intentionally placed to steer people back to the middle. Others are sincere in believing that a middle and compromised solution actually exists. Either way, these become outlets and relieve the pressure and anger they are feeling. The normie dissident will mobilize under the just flexing enough safety of a Come and Take ‘Em banner but will never finish reading the Evola, Spengler or Ernst Jünger books he bought during his initial rejection stage.

The strategic solution to capture the Normie Dissident, and one that Kaiser mentions, is that an attractive and compelling alternative needs to exist. It needs to be a movement that is welcoming and not bizarre. It needs to offer a path that seems plausible and achievable. It needs to offer a new identity that is not embarrassing to adopt and advocate for. As mentioned in many articles here on Identity Dixie, the South, and to lesser degrees, other regions of the United States, have the fundamentals to make the case.

The Useless Dissident

The motivations for the person who shape-shifts and spirals downward after leaving the mainstream I believe shares important similarities to the leftist who embraces the idea of permanent revolution. At their core, these people are deeply insecure and don’t believe they are capable of competing and achieving in normie society, either economically or socially.

Like the leftist, they find their identity in being on the fringe with little to lose and with the ability to point their finger at The Establishment as the reason for their failure. The irony of this type of person is that if the position they advocate for becomes popular, they will reject it and move to the safety of a newly created fringe to avoid having to do the hard work of building the new order they once supported.

It’s a weak analogy, but it reminds me of the type of kids I remember in high school who, in order to be as different as possible because they were intimidated about fitting into an accepted social niche, moved from Top 40, to metal, to industrial punk, to Goth and Emo, to finally discovering their parent’s Bob Dylan and Joan Baez records.

These people are not to be trusted and should be ignored. They have no serious plans beyond burning it down and fantasizing about being a warlord with a harem.

The Dissident Core

It’s not an accident that the true dissidents are surprisingly normal and stable people. They can (and should) identify with the Normie Dissident because we too simply want stability and normalcy for our families.

The secret I believe to understanding what it takes to be a dissident is in the word used many times here and that is, Identity. A true Identity is not political or ideological. It is rooted in the permanent things like family, faith, cherished customs, and place. The most articulate, effective, and committed among us can check all these boxes. It is why Southern identity is so integral to a movement that has the chance of picking up the pieces when the oppressive and injustice system inevitably collapses. The truth is, being a dissident is the easiest and most natural state for someone who loves and understands who they are.

The post The Good, the Normie, and the Useless appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

We dissidents have a rough time, sometimes.

Not only do we risk public vilification, losing our jobs, and losing our entire social network, but we also have to deal with the fact that a lot of other dissidents hop in and hop out of this line of work without what even seems like a second thought.

The sad reality is that it is difficult to keep dissidents engaged.

Why? Well, there are numerous reasons for this.

We walk along a tight path filled with many sharp vines waiting to catch a person who veers off even a little.

Here are just a few (four) of the main reasons that come to mind:

1) I think the first and the most obvious is risk. A lot of young guys get into this and don’t mind the risk. But as they get older, or get families, that risk glooms ever more menacingly.

This is why you see so many dissidents as “leaders” who are not married. [Which is hilarious, because these are the last people that should be leaders. The Bible says one of the first things a leader should have is their own house in order. If you can’t even build that house, you probably shouldn’t be a leader. But that is a side tangent.] It is easier for the non-married to stick with it, given they have no real responsibilities or progeny to account for.

But, it is what it is. Let’s take who we can. We don’t have a lot of married guys as leaders because a lot of them leave when the risk becomes too much. What is that old saying about the kitchen getting too hot? It applies here.

2) Then there’s the “general life” reason. Sometimes, life just gets in the way. Economic hardship comes, and you have to make a living. No time for this. I get it. There’s been times where I’ve ducked out of this, too. But I must be an addict, because I keep coming back.

3) Another less discussed reason is a lack of a dissident support network. Which is also a huge one. Various groups have recognized this need and have been trying to fill this gap, but it is still difficult. It is hard to stay engaged and, like you, are making a difference in silence.

This is why I treasure every comment and email I get, even the hate mail. At least it means I’m reaching someone.

Nonetheless, the most successful dissidents are the ones that develop formal support networks. Even anonymous ones, as long as they are viable and not feds.

4) Perhaps one of the biggest reasons of dissident disengagement, however, is the pathway problem. Dissidents come over here to this side of politics because they learn truth. This means they are first willing to accept truth. That already puts them in the minority.

If people stay on that path, I firmly believe that it has to end with Jesus Christ. He is Truth personified and perfected.

So, most dissidents start with a political lens. They may even come before that with an economic one. But eventually, with enough intellectual curiosity, they continue to learn and go deeper. They want the big questions answered. But the biggest questions always lead us to spirituality. Politics does not have the answer.

So, those that eventually go the full length—that spiritual route—find God. And a lot of them then focus more effort on Him over politics.

Which, of course, is a great thing. But it doesn’t mean you need to abandon your countryman. Which, I feel like is often what happens. Half of the spiritual finalists go internal, and do not see the commands to love your neighbors (which means to stay in the fight).

Conversely, some guys get to the spiritual part and they go even harder fighting for their people.

So, some leave and some go even harder when they reach the end.

This is a difficulty in keeping dissidents engaged. I think we do a disservice by not talking about this more openly, and not encouraging people to go that full route for God, but then to stick with us. Because I think what they would actually find at the end is what God asks of us. The dissident should be even more fired up to fight for their people.

But since we don’t talk about it, they are left in the dark. They find what they find and then they leave.

While that pathway is not great, it is at least better than the weirdos. Some dissidents take the political route until they hit the spiritual progression, and then they become nutjobs.

I’m talking: Economics -> Politics -> Spirituality -> Weird Pagan Cult. Not a good look.

You all know what I’m talking about. The political dissidents that make up their own religions, adopt some weird pagan Odin bullshit, or fall in hard-core on the enlightenment science voodooism.

These people follow the same progression. They probably start with economics, go to politics, and then hit spirituality. But they’re just too weak to accept the full truth in the spirituality department. So, they go crazy due to the hyper-focus on the material.

I think the human biodiversity guys, the ultra-antisemites waving Nazi flags and wearing stupid costumes, the dissident evolutionists, and similar groups fall in this category.

It is hard to keep dissidents engaged when they become insane. It is also hard to keep the non-insane dissidents engaged when they see and learn from these freaks. All of these things contribute to a lack of engagement long term with dissidents.

At the end of the day, it is always the same pathway: Dissident politics to dissident spirituality. One rejects the modern anti-Christendom material structure of the elites, and the other rejects the modern anti-Christendom spiritual structure of the devil.

Some move on this pathway quicker than others. Some become stagnant. But from my time in this sphere, it seems like this is the pretty usual trend. There may be a few anomalies here and there, but I’ve noticed this consistently.

Read More About This Pathway Here: The Slow Process Of Becoming A Dissident & The Dissident Life Cycle.

Frankly, it is getting tough to continue to watch the newer dissidents take these paths. I don’t like to see our young guys entering the same old errors.

Which I guess is a reason that I’m still here. If I can help direct people to that Christ-focused progression pathway that ends with an invigorated dissident, I have done my job.

Eternity matters a lot more than the kingdoms of this age. But that does not mean that these kingdoms are meaningless. It’s just good to keep it in perspective.

We are not all meant to be theologians. But we all are meant to fight and minister for our people. We still need political leaders, and to completely forgo this domain is to be in error.

If you stay engaged long enough, you will notice what I am saying here. You will start to see it, too.

I think we need to talk about it more openly, so we could keep more of our boys engaged.

Being a dissident is a difficult and dangerous task. We risk a lot with little benefit, especially in our own lifetime.

But speaking, the truth is worth it. What we do is critical in keeping the torch of civilization alive. And if we truly love our neighbors, we are commanded to continue to fight for them.

Stay engaged. Stay winning. Don’t get caught up in any of these vines.

The post The Difficulty in Keeping Dissidents Engaged appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I needed some white undershirts along with groceries, so I found myself at Walmart this morning. I discovered that a pack of three white shirts, which cost about ten bucks, in now behind glass. I asked one of the workers nearby to open it for me, but she didn’t have the authority. Another had to come over with a phone to unlock the case with an app.

This black lady spent a few minutes trying to get the thing to work and then I suggested she try to unlock the next case, and I could reach in to grab it from this other case. I got my shirts and casually inquired why they were now locked up, since the value is so small compared to many things in this store which aren’t locked up. She struggled to form a coherent sentence, but it was something about “groups.”

As someone who notices things, understands efficiency, costs, etc. what sprang to my mind first is why they didn’t just use locks with a key. Keys work every time, they’re much cheaper, and they don’t rely on the internet. There are, however, certain civilizational concepts which are called into question when undershirts must be locked in a case.

Essentially, functioning countries rely on the cooperation of the general populace to function. Law enforcement is there to deal with limited quantities of exceptions. Too many exceptions, and things that functioned begin falling apart. In this sense, the authorities are paper tigers relying on the populace to volunteer its compliance. They can’t deal with even a third of the population being in a state of non-compliance, which we learned from them trying to force everyone to take the genetic injections.

Something which Americans are going to have to come to grips with is how things are done in the Third World. For instance, I live in an affluent neighborhood, and I wouldn’t even leave a lighter on my dashboard. One of my neighbors had his window smashed in because he had a Subway gift card on the front seat of his car. He was surprised because it only had three bucks left on it.

In a Third World country, you can’t even leave a car on the street at night and your house needs to be enclosed within a shoddy brick wall with broken glass cemented on top. I think he’ll be in for more surprises as this place slides further into the shitter. I’m at least not surprised.

EXCLUSIVE: Chicago gangbangers rage against newly arrived Venezuelan migrants as Tren de Aragua moves in: ‘City is going to go up in flames’ https://t.co/I9pxpX4FDd pic.twitter.com/0xaaRFnqqP

— New York Post (@nypost) September 23, 2024

Blacks are closer to an asteroid belt which collides with whatever comes into proximity than a collective. Still, they’re capable of understanding as a collective that they’re getting free stuff and if more people come to receive free stuff, this will be a problem for black people. They can also understand that these new people are receiving similar exemptions from law enforcement to what black people receive and are simultaneously willing to use more force on black people than white people these days.

So, they’re upset about the new arrivals. However, they’re not capable of organizing themselves much better than an asteroid belt, so they’re destined to lose a conflict with whoever shows up just like they have for their entire existence. That’s just too bad for them, they really had it good here for quite a while.

The crazy thing about America is that I’ve never even seen undershirts locked up in the Third World. Objectively, this is pretty wild. Moreover, in these derelict countries there are a lot less regulations forced on you. So, they do have their upsides, including being able to shoot someone for theft. America is on its own level in terms of insanity, tyranny, and dysfunction. This makes predictions difficult. Worse is easy of course, but the shape of things to come remains cloudy.

The post Unlocking Our Destiny appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The world of local bigfoot variations is fairly fascinating to investigate. Sure, most people know about sasquatch and the yeti, but there are many others. One of those variations is the Fouke Monster, named after the small town in Arkansas, right where Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas meet. As a noted lover of this region and its stories, Charles B. Piece set out to make a movie about the monster. What he produced is one of the best horror films of the early 1970s and also one of the most influential movies of the era, though its influence is more covert than overt, with its biggest impact not being felt until almost three decades after its release.

That film, The Legend of Boggy Creek, eschews a traditional narrative in favor of a documentary style – the film sets up interviews with those who supposedly had an interaction with the monster, while their stories play out in a reenactment. The use of locals further gives the film its realistic feel that provides the film much of its power. It is difficult for modern viewers to fully appreciate just how groundbreaking the film was thanks to the rise of fake documentaries and “found footage” horror films; however, in the early 1970s, audiences had seen nothing like this. Keeping in the maverick ethos of low budget filmmaking, Charles B. Pierce knew he could not afford the actors or special effects that Hollywood could, so he competed by presenting something that mainstream cinema did not. In this case, it was a brand-new narrative style.

What winds up on film is a textbook example of the art of restraint. Amazingly for a horror film, The Legend of Boggy Creek is rated G, although it would be PG today. Still, the film is a great example of how to produce terror by what is not shown rather than by what is shown. Pierce understands how to make his audience’s imagination work to create a sense of terror. It really does feel like what we are all watching is real. The use of locals, rather than professional actors, further adds to this sense of realism.

As mentioned before, The Legend of Boggy Creek is one of the most influential movies of the era. In many ways, its influence can be determined in two distinct phases. The first phase is more overt, immediate, but also more temporary. The next phase is more covert, delayed, but has also radically altered horror cinema for the past 25 years. The first phase can be seen with the slew of bigfoot movies that formed a minor, if consistent, part of the rural drive-in circuit for a number of years after The Legend of Boggy Creek was released. Remember, The Legend of Boggy Creek was actually one of the biggest hits of 1972. In the years before the blockbuster-dominated mindset came in the wake of the Jaws/Star Wars one-two punch, The Legend of Boggy Creek could be the 11th highest grossing film of the year. Needless to say, bigfoot was viewed as big money and other filmmakers rushed to make their own bigfoot films. The films range from being highly enjoyable in their own right to being downright unwatchable, with the similarly Southern-set Creature from Black Lake along with Night of the Demon being the two best films to come out of the post-Boggy Creek bigfoot cinema landscape.

But there is a second, and even more impactful, phase of The Legend of Boggy Creek’s influence. The Legend of Boggy Creek, with its pseudo-documentary style, directly anticipated the rise of the “found footage” subgenre. The creators of The Blair Witch Project have openly named it as one of their biggest influences, and as much as I hate The Blair Witch Project, it is still hard not to admire just how much this little unassuming movie from a local Arkansas filmmaker has had. The “found footage” genre has radically altered the horror landscape, and The Legend of Boggy Creek is the template for which that entire genre flows. At the very least, this film is one of the best examples of a filmmaker blurring the line of reality and fiction, and it all comes together wonderfully. There is a reason, despite its restraint, the film managed to scare so many children of the 1980s, children raised on Friday the 13th and A Nightmare on Elm Street, as they watched the film during its repeated showings on late night television. Pierce understood his resource limitations and used them to his greater benefit.

Sadly, the film has slipped through the cultural cracks in recent years, most of which is not due to the film aging poorly (it hasn’t), but rather due to its troubled release in the DVD era. For years it was assumed that the film had fallen into public domain, meaning that while it was pretty easy to find, most of the releases were of poor quality and sourced from the VHS. Unless a public domain film is of the stature of Night of the Living Dead, it is very difficult for it to get a high-quality release, its commonly viewed as not worth it. Finally in 2019, it was discovered that the film was not actually in public domain and the film rights went to Pierce’s daughter. The film was released on Blu-Ray, but there were a limited number of copies, and it can be difficult to find today.

But the effort is well worth it. Pierce’s shooting of rural Arkansas is absolutely stunning, and I am grateful that the Blu-Ray version has finally allowed us to see just what the man intended. It really does look like footage from a very good nature documentary. It shows Pierce’s technical talent in a way that has not been fully appreciated yet. All and all, The Legend of Boggy Creek is a textbook example of how horror movies can thrive on restraint even in the modern (post-1968) era that still works well today, even as its once unheard-of narrative style has become commonplace.

The post Dixie’s Scorsese: The Films of Charles B. Pierce, Part II: The Legend of Boggy Creek appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

After the Democrats switched out President Biden for Vice President Harris this summer, America experienced a rushed introduction to a candidate it has known for five years. She was different. She was new. She was brat. It hyped up the base. After the sugar high, people started to ask what her policy positions were. There have been few if any and this caused vigorous harrumphs from the Right but revealed the truth about the Democrats. No policies are needed anymore.

Biden’s tenure did have policies and did involve legislation. We witnessed an Inflation Reduction Act, which was a renamed Green New Deal. America’s borders were wide open and foreigners flown into the US in numbers equal to small states. America fully funded a proxy war against a nuclear power, and supported another dust up that may grow into a regional war. What was Kamala going to do? Nothing.

Nothing. It does not matter. Biden’s tenure also cemented how the president is a ceremonial role. The permanent government and its high end beneficiaries dictate the terms. Revealing for one month (to oust him) that Biden was a listless geezer showed what many suspected. People forget that Obama himself was not an agent of change but merely a spokesman for the zeitgeist and fellow traveler in the changes in society. We already reached the point where the Democrats view the role this way. One can look at the 2019 Democrat nomination process and see that none of them had accomplishments but were merely different demographics promoting the same current year pablum.

Kamala flip-flopping or staying mum means nothing. She is a non-entity, similar to the Obama is an empty suit accusation. If she wins, the same policies of 2024 will continue in 2025. The branding of America’s federal government as a nonpartisan entity should be buried even in the minds of the most naive adult, and events of the last decade should have made it clear.

There is a special thing that does matter for 2025. The plate-spinning on economic numbers will stop, and we will likely see a confirmed recession or at minimum an admission that it is rough out there. Who gets to reward and aid whom matters. Never forget that there was no infrastructure stimulus under Obama because it would pay white men disproportionately. We got social welfare and an expansion in student loans for consumers.

Calls for policies do not matter. After the Kamala-Biden swap, I was in Rhode Island. Rhode Island is 70% white, will vote for Kamal at a 55-60% rate and has seen population stagnate so much they almost lost an electoral vote. It is a husk of its former self. There are many whiter than white suburbs and small towns in Rhode Island. Drive through them and one will see Harris-Walz signs dotting lawns. These white voters know groceries have doubled. They have Ukraine flags, some weathered, and are good people. They know a vote for Kamala is more of the same. They grumble about immigrants flooding Providence and Boston, but that is always another city. Eventually, cities will unload those immigrants. Eventually, non-profits will run out of red towns with capacity. Construction firms will gladly build apartment complexes in their towns, and they will find city managers and mayors will be just as corrupt in their town as in Springfield, Ohio. The federal government is a self-running system, and it has protected and rewarded them so far.

The policies do not matter. Come on man, everything is better since we voted out the Orange Man. It’s vibes. Kamala is joyful. The television and iPhone say so! One more election to defeat the Orange Man, and then they can turn the page. These higher income white enclaves are readers and will gladly turn the page. The bad news is that they will not like the next chapter.

-By Fred Watson, Jr.

The post Kamala Does Not Need Policies appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Filmmaker Charles B. Pierce was a man of many talents. During a career that saw its greatest amount of success in the 1970s, he worked in a wide variety of genres, though he was especially drawn to horror, crime, and Westerns. It was in the action genre where he would make his greatest pop cultural impact when working as a story writer on the fourth Dirty Harry movie Sudden Impact. It was Pierce who wrote the iconic line, “Go ahead, make my day” uttered by Clint Eastwood. According to Pierce, the line actually originated with his own father. Pierce, as a teenager of the 1950s, deeply admired the rebellious teen icons of the era like James Dean. His father, though, would have none of this and used that famous line to warn his son of the consequences of not mowing the lawn. But his career is much more than that, as will be examined in this series of articles. This first article will examine his life and general career, as well as the overarching themes present in his work. The second article will examine his most famous film, The Legend of Boggy Creek. The third article will look at his best work, The Town that Dreaded Sundown. The fourth and final article will examine Pierce’s work within the context of the now largely and sadly forgotten regional exploitation filmmakers of the 1960s-1980s.

Though technically born in Indiana, he would move with his family to the small south Arkansas town of Hampton when he was just a few months old, and it was here where he would always call home. His love of this region – north Louisiana/south Arkansas is one of the most notable elements in his body of work. He loves the region – its land, its history, and its people. To him, these are great people with fascinating stories, stories that needed to be told and he was the man to do it. What is even more telling his how much respect he has for his subjects. Unlike many “Hicksploitation” directors, Pierce has a lack of critical Southern stereotypes in his films. For as much as Hollywood has enjoyed trafficking in certain anti-Southern stereotypes, such as hackneyed stupidity, Pierce avoids this tired trope. There are stupid characters for comic relief, but these are the exception. Pierce also stocks his films with intelligent and seriously minded Southerners.

Martin Scorsese has long been noted as the director of ethnic Catholic America, especially Italian-Americans in films such as Who’s That Knocking at My Door, Mean Streets, and Goodfellas. Scorsese loves his people, and he is moved by the Little Italy that molded him. I would compare Pierces use of Dixie, especially Arkansas, to how Scorsese used Little Italy. Both men wanted to tell the stories of the guys they grew up with. But perhaps his daughter said it best, “Arkansas claims him, and he claimed Arkansas.” And he was an Arkansan through and through. He loved his state and her people. He loved the Razorbacks. And though he would often incorporate the neighboring regions of Louisiana and Texas into his work, it is clear that Arkansas holds a special place in his heart.

Pierce’s love of Arkansas is further evident in how long he remained a regional filmmaker. He would stay in his little corner of Dixie for almost all of his career, moving to California only in the mid-1980s when changing market trends killed off the independent theaters that played films by quirky oddballs like him. This is important, because upon watching Pierce’s better films, something that becomes apparent is that he had strong technical skills. His films are lovingly and beautifully shot and watching them now fully restored on Blu-ray further illustrates his technical talents. In other words, he could have easily moved to California earlier on in his career and found work easily, perhaps as a solid journeyman filmmaker, the kind of guy who made enjoyable, if not groundbreaking movies at a steady pace. But Pierce opted to stay in Arkansas where he could tell the stories he wanted about the people he thought mainstream Hollywood cinema was either ignoring or slandering.

Pierce made his last widely seen film in 1985 (Boggy Creek II: And the Legend Continues) and his last film in 1998 (Chasing the Wind). Although he moved to California in an attempt to continue his career, his move would not pan out, even as he penned one of Harry Callahan’s most famous lines. As talented as he was, he was just not cut out for the low budget cinema of the 1980s. The 1970s were far kinder to him. Despite his late career move, he would die in his beloved South, passing away of natural causes in Tennessee in 2010. He is missed. He was one of the best filmmakers of his ilk of the 1970s, and his films are just begging to be rediscovered. Two of those films will be examined in the next articles of this series.

The post Dixie’s Scorsese: The Films of Charles B. Pierce, Part I: The Way of an Arkansas Auteur appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One theory that has always been of major interest to me from a philosophical standpoint is the ‘theory of continual degeneration.’

This theory posits that, rather than evolving or improving overtime, humanity is instead gradually declining in physical, intellectual, and spiritual capacities. It puts forward the idea that due to various internal and external factors, we are facing a slow but steady decline of humanity.

This theory spits in the face of evolution, which largely hypothesizes the exact opposite. Or at least evolution used to do so until they realized they were clearly wrong in many circumstances. Now, they’ve taken a more ambiguous route with calling much of it “random” and claiming it could be good or bad due to mutations. They’ll say whatever they have to in order to make their theory work.

But enough evolution trash talk. The competing theory of continual degeneration has stayed the course. This concept has been around a lot longer than evolution, and has been debated by the ancient historians, philosophers, biologists, anthropologists, and even Enlightenment thinkers.

In fact, one could argue that this is one of the earliest origin beliefs.

It is obviously present in Christianity. The story of Adam and Eve portrays a flawless beginning, followed by a moral descent that led to a physical decline.

If you actually take time to read the Bible, you’ll also notice continual degeneration as a trend throughout it. Just look at the length of life for a clear example. The oldest patriarchs lived 10 times the length that we live now. It gradually reduced over time.

The rapid decline in biblical lifespans over generations – Lifespan vs. number of generations from Noah for various biblical figures. (source: from Creation.com)Now, of course, in the modern day, you have people claiming we are living longer. But this is just a nice hand trick with the statistics, since babies are more likely to survive to reach adulthood, thereby increasing the average age of life across the generation. Still, if we compare it to biblical ages, we are obviously living far less. A minor jump here or there of +/- 15 years changes nothing.

In Christianity, we also see this theory with the apostasy of the church. The church was strongest when Jesus was here. Then, overtime, it slowly degenerated. The Bible even mentions in the very last times that a great apostasy would come to overtake the church. I personally believe that time is now, if you just look at the churches of the modern age. But regardless of when that is, it clearly is going to happen.

The church is not improving. It is getting far worse.

Continual degeneration.

The same degeneration belief is found in other religious thought. The Hindu’s four cycles gradually decline until utter abomination. Look up the four epochs or yugas if you are interested.

Even the ancient Greek and Romans used to believe in a “golden age of humanity”, where early humans lived in harmony with nature and each other. But, we are now more distant from this age. As time increases, they believed we will become further distant from that golden era.

This concept is present among many religious schools of thought. The only group that has ever opposed it is the modern Enlightenment evolutionist. The same group that changes their positions every five years or so. Not exactly a side I would wish to be on.

But even some Enlightenment thinkers during the Age of the Enlightenment upheld these beliefs. Philosophers like Jean-Jacques Rousseau held a similar argument: he believed that the corrupting influence of civilization on humanity has degraded us from the natural state where we were healthier and more virtuous.

Some scientists, like Cesare Lombroso, took Darwin’s ideas of beneficial evolution and applied it to degeneration.

Max Nordau wrote in his book, Degeneration (1892), that modern society, particularly its culture, brought about degeneration. He strongly argued that things like the industrial revolution and culture were the driving force of continual degeneration.

I think all of these guys are right in their own way. But they did not piece together the full picture. When we look around, it is hard to deny that degeneration is occurring everywhere. We are nowhere as strong, virtuous, or intelligent as our ancestors.

Hell, we even have random diseases, affecting us now that never used to exist. Look at modern things like allergies, autism, obesity, and other such degenerative conditions.

We are becoming weaker, more frail, and more just plain weird. Sure, we have sporadic times that offset these general trends. But if you look at the overall trend, it would be similar to the chart above. We keep dropping on average. Sadly, we are not getting better. We are getting worse.

But I take a more nuanced approach as to why this is happening.

As a Christian, I believe in continual degeneration. I believe we are going to continue to get worse until Christ returns. But I think the methods are multifaceted. As God often likes to do. The root reason is the Fall, but the methods are many.

Here are just a few of the methods I think continual degeneration is occurring through:

• Genetic diseases and Epigenetics. The human society advances in medicine. This advance in medicine allows people with genetic diseases to live longer and reproduce, increasing the frequency of harmful genes in the population. This is a Catch-22. You don’t want people to die of preventable diseases. But by not letting them, you degrade the entire species’ genetic line. Any form of advancement has built-in degeneration into it for this reason.
  • For the Christian, this is clearly God-designed. The more we try to act like gods, the more we harm ourselves in the long-run. It’s a natural, built-in system of degeneration.
• Technology. Technology gives us the ability to learn deeper and to go further than without it. However, in large scale, it also creates a population of prosperity. Which reduces the drive and necessity for self improvement. One can just rely on technology to survive, instead of getting more intelligent or stronger to do so. It saps our attention span and draws us away from things that are important, reducing us to a worse state. This ties in with modern sedentary lifestyles. We just keep getting weaker because of getting better technology.
• Social-cultural factors. It is no surprise to any of my readers that culture is declining. But why is this? Well, Spengler, in his work “Decline of the West“, saw this through a civilizational lens. Similar to how the physical nature of humans grows, peaks, and then declines, he argued that civilization does too. I would just take this one step further and say so does humanity as a whole. God commanded that all things die. That will include this very age. It would only make sense if we as a whole follow the same path that our civilizations, our lives, and everything else we know does. It’s all a cycle of rise and decline since death was introduced in the garden.
  • The modernist is right when he says that “we will kill ourselves”. It is likely built into us to do so. If we survive long enough, we’ll destroy ourselves through these modifications we continue to play god with.
• The longer society goes on the more social isolation increases. We are reaching an end-stage, where there won’t be any social interaction at all. Everything will be through a computer. This is not a joke. It is not too far away. Ask a zoomer.
• Environmental decay. This is one area that I believe is the strongest evidence of continual degeneration. Look at our natural ecosystem: Ever since the industrial revolution, even our soil has been degenerating. It does not have the same level of nutrients or vitamins that it did even 100 years ago, much less 2000. The entire world has been covered in toxic substances, microplastics, and the like. Poor air quality is everywhere, and biodiversity is decreasing. You do not have to be an environmentalist nut job to realize that we are facing an endemic, continual degeneration of our environment. Yes, it is mostly our own fault, but is that not even further evidence of the continual degeneration of humanity? Humanity is at fault for this, yet we keep doing it. Instead of realizing the harmful impacts of each stage of development, we just design new things to try to “fix” the symptom.

We are at such a point that we now need tools like CRISPR to fix our own genome from the very problems we have caused. Hilariously (and ironically), we need CRISPR to fix autism that was likely caused by our vaccines and weird seed oils. We’ll need a lot of CRISPR to fix all the damages from the toxic substances and processed foods we ingest.

We even need other medical advancements like Ozempic to fix the obesity degeneration that was caused by prosperity and the sedentary lifestyles brought about due to technology. It’s all a loop.

Heck, more people are literate now than in history. But what do they use that literacy for? To better scroll through TikTok videos… IQ surely has not increased over time.

Each supposed “advancement” that humans can name is actually just a correction for a prior degeneration. With very few exceptions.

Humanity sure is a wild ride.

Whether you believe in the theory of continual degeneration or not, it does raise very thought-provoking questions. What is the future of humanity? How should we respond to various advancements when they do happen (like Artificial Intelligence)? And many more.

This theory gives us a unique way to look at the world around us. In my opinion, a biblical way. But also a way that most other modern people do not see the world. So it becomes a unique, treasured insight.

However you decide to look at the future and answer those hard philosophical questions, keep in mind this theory of continual degeneration. If nothing else, it should serve as a cautionary warning. Perhaps even a bellwether.

The post The Continual Degeneration of the Human Species appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

There are two big problems with Matt Walsh’s new comedy/documentary Am I Racist? First, it lacks anything interesting or even coherent to say about race relations, which destroys any point in making a documentary. Second, it’s not very funny, which raises certain problems in making a comedy.

There’s no reason why this movie shouldn’t work. The premise is pretty simple: a conservative Borat, except where in that film the marks are respectable middle-American types, here the marks are the worst and most credulous and stupidest people on earth. More than that, the film is produced by the Daily Wire, which means they have the resources to actually get these con artists and scumbags together in one place. And in fact, they are able to get some of the most notorious race grifters into the room with Matt Walsh, which is an impressive feat, the film’s failures notwithstanding.

The problem is all in the execution, which is everything. First off, it’s a film, so it needs some kind of premise to move it forward. What we get is that Matt Walsh wants to learn about racism (of course, we know he doesn’t) but he’s too famous to infiltrate most anti-racist groups (pretty dubious) and so he needs to don a bad wig and some different glasses in order to do so (OK, maybe he’s not that famous). It’s such a lazy setup not even aspiring to the level of fiction. Even a neutral observer watching Sacha Baron Cohen had to concede that the fish-out-of-water premise was funny. It makes it easier to endure what is, after all, blatant mockery of your political enemies. Why not bring in Ben Shapiro threatening to fire him if he doesn’t get diversity training? It’s not a big deal, but when your schtick is “humble everyman” encountering crazy people, the extra layer of conceit really helps.

Take a step back from it all, and you realize that the central theme of the film is the greatness of black people, whose sanctity is besmirched by the rising tide of race hustlers (mostly women—some white women). After all, hate crimes are down (a very light-skinned professor comes on to talk about that). And some French Guyanan immigrants from the Bayou are there to tell you how great America is. Also, Walsh talks to some Good-Ol’-Boys who drunkenly assure us that they’re living by Dr. King’s mantras and that the only people keeping alive racism are the people attacking it (or maybe that was a Thomas Sowell quote, but same difference).

To put it succinctly: the movie is totally about black/white race relations, and the filmmakers are really, really afraid of offending black people. As such, jokes that would have flown fast and furious in sitcoms just ten years ago are verboten here. Walsh gets off one decent crack about a black carjacker. The best ethnic joke in the film is told by a stand-in for Matt’s racist uncle (who should’ve had much more screen time) and it’s about Mexican men. That’s about it as far as real wisecracking goes. Look, I’m not expecting Walsh and crew to promote overturning the 14th Amendment, but why can’t they at least try to bring comedy back to the edginess of circa-2010 Jay Leno? That raises the question: if race relations are really so great, why can’t we tell jokes about one another?

Straight black men come off pretty well in the film. Women are the primary focus of Walsh’s real animosity. The filmmakers keep track of the amount they have to pay the DEI experts to come talk to them on camera. One of them is a Ph.D. holder from Arizona State who harassed some white people in a student lounge for a “Police Lives Matter” bumper sticker on their computers. Another is a black mother who sought legal action after her two girls were snubbed by someone in a Sesame Street outfit at a parade. This woman, according to the producers, got $50,000 to appear in the movie. Listening to her, it’s pretty clear that this woman shouldn’t fetch $50,000 on a slave market, let alone for an interview. But Walsh doesn’t even raise any real disputes with them, let alone mock them. These people are clear charlatans and crooks who deserve all kinds of chastisement and probably much worse. At the very least, he could’ve asked them some hypothetical questions about breakfast that morning.

It’s hard to tell if the producers are just toothless, insipid, or lazy. The best comedic bit of the movie is with White Fragility author Robin DiAngelo (again, kudos for just getting the interview). Walsh brings out a black producer and starts giving him reparations directly out of his wallet. After some prodding and debate over systemic and personal acts against racism, he convinces DiAngelo to chip in thirty bucks from her purse (which the producers tally against the $20k they have already paid her).

That’s a good bit, but it’s one of the few real bits conjured up in the whole film. Most of the time, the producers are content to bring on the shysters to embarrass themselves. But if that’s the only scheme, why not just watch YouTube videos, or browse their twitter accounts? Why go through with such an elaborate setup if you’re not willing to deliver the punchline?—especially when the premise is like shooting fish in a barrel. The problem faced by derisory comics like Sacha Baron Cohen, Robert Smigel, Don Rickels (etc.) is that at some point the audience might start to sympathize with the objects of mockery. But the people Walsh interviews are the biggest con artists in the world. Real insult comics used to be twice as mean to people they liked, while Walsh gives kids-glove treatment to people he supposedly hates. One thing I kept thinking while I was watching was, couldn’t they find a Jew to do this?

The theater I was in was full of like-minded Trump supporters, all of us probably desperate for some entertainment that doesn’t openly despise us. The problem is that it just isn’t very good. It isn’t because the people making it don’t have talent; if Walsh were to hone his comedic chops, he could carry a movie pretty easy. But the movie is kind of a conservative version of the “nod and clap” stuff that has made all liberal comedy unbearable since Trump rode down the elevator. But literally all the Daily Wire folks have to do to get schlubs like me in the seats is make comedies with jokes in them. Instead of pushing “conservative media,” why can’t they just conserve media?

-By Richard Greenhorn

The post Matt Walsh’s “Am I Racist?” appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Jews will push a situation as far as it can possibly be taken without regards to the consequences this will eventually bring upon them. They’re evil and this is part of their nature even if some of them can recognize that what they’re doing collectively will go terribly wrong right away. Christ warned us. Nobody should be surprised.

Thus, tolerating their aggression simply leads to escalation. This is lesson learned by the Russians the hard way. Tolerance of Jewish aggression against them and trying to negotiate a peaceful settlement simply led to a massive war which is now being fought inside of Russia’s pre-war borders.

BREAKING:

Several large Russian weapons depots destroyed in Ukrainian drone swarm strikes a few hours ago.

This video shows the weapons depot storing North Korean artillery shells exploding in Tikhoretsk, in the Krasnodar region nearly 500 km from the frontlines. pic.twitter.com/Kzsdsua7iT

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) September 21, 2024

Putin says he’s fighting Nazi’s doing the bidding of “the Anglo-Saxons,” which drives them crazy, but has remarked that any deal with the West serves merely to buy it time to put a knife into Russia’s back. The Russian government also now labels the West as “non-agreement capable.” He knows, the Jews know, and we know that he’s referring to the Jews.

The hysteria over Putin by Western politicians and the media is a direct result of Jewish fear and loathing of him since he took control of Russia and put an end to their looting operation and later thwarted their demolition of Syria.

The average American wouldn’t otherwise care about Russia and doesn’t understand anything about it, let alone the fact that these Jews who hijacked our country came from the former Russian Empire and Soviet Union. We’re simply told that Robert Kagan is a foreign policy expert and Victoria Nuland represents America’s global struggle for freedom in the State Department.

It’s therefore hard for Americans to understand that all the United States has been doing since the end of the Cold War is crossing red line after red line against the targets of Jewish aggression, which can never be placated or satisfied because Jews believe themselves to be entitled to the entire planet and the literal enslavement of humanity. Whether they subscribe to this notion through faith in their Satanic religious document, the Talmud, or through genetic instinct, is really of no importance to the rest of us.

BREAKING: Lebanon hit with massive bomb, one of the largest Israel has ever sent.

Developing.

Shockwave felt many many miles away..pic.twitter.com/FIDAaURdvj

— Douglas Macgregor (@DougAMacgregor) September 21, 2024

What Hamas got from negotiating with the Jews was the Jews murdering their lead negotiator on a diplomatic compound in Iran while the genocide went on unabated. What Iran and Hezbollah get from showing restraint in the face of Jewish aggression was a dastardly pager attack and now a massive assault on Lebanon which seems to be aimed at turning it into an unlivable zone the same as Gaza. The thing is though, the situation eventually goes wrong for the Jews every single time.

For example, they’re positively giddy about the success of their terrorist attack with the exploding pagers and walkie talkies while ignoring what a dirty and underhanded act they just performed in full view of the world. I’ve done a lot of business in China and Taiwan, and I follow the Chinese media. What stands out to me in the Chinese coverage is what a dirty thing this was to do, but also how the Jews just turned China into the trusted manufacturer of any device that Jews could pack with a thin strip of explosives to murder someone.

There are a lot of people around the planet, myself included, who are now worried about the Jews blowing them up with their cell phone. China is making better phones than Apple these days, and that’s what people are going to start using instead. Whatever surveillance China has on their phone isn’t really a problem compared to the phone exploding in my back pocket. The footage of the aftermath is really gruesome, so I won’t post it here. It wasn’t worth the hundreds of people they killed or maimed, but the Jews simply can’t consider things from this angle.

Likewise, they take forbearance for weakness. After Putin had no choice but to order the SMO back in February of 2022, a major question posed even by the Russian public was why he didn’t act immediately when the Ukrainian government was overthrown by the United States back in 2014. NATO used the eight ensuing years to prepare a massive war against Russia. In theory, that would’ve been a better time to intervene.

Putin talks about his desire for a peaceful solution, but the most interesting answer came from Medvedev: Russia needed time to rebuild its military industrial complex. Moreover, it wouldn’t have been able to cope with the agricultural sanctions in particular. The entire point of forcing Putin’s hand in 2022 was to justify sanctions to collapse Russia’s economy, so he avoided walking into the trap set up for him until the sanctions could be ignored successfully.

The Jews smelled blood in the water in 2022 and their entire Western apparatus was giddy about Russia’s imminent implosion and then it never happened. In short, their aggression backfired on them. Now the credibility of Western military and economic dominance has been squandered. Even the Houthis are willing to challenge it because they knew that they could win.

Israel dropped this bomb on Lebanon—imagine the scale of the other explosives and their devastating impact on the children of Gaza. #Lebanon #Gaza pic.twitter.com/Viv00Y55xd

— Global Eyes Watch (@GlobalEyesWatch) September 21, 2024

The fact that Hezbollah and Iran tried to be patient simply led to the Jews using the opportunity to attempt a leadership decapitation and now an effort to depopulate Lebanon. Hezbollah has no choice at this point but to fight to the best of its capabilities because otherwise the Jews are going to kill them all. They’ve already had success against its commando leadership, leveling an entire apartment building to murder them.

While the Jews are going to have to go to great lengths to get rid of the Arabs from Gaza and Lebanon, the Arabs won’t have this problem with the Jews. Jews are aggressive but they’re also hysterical, cowardly parasites. The Arabs don’t have to level every building in Israel to get them to leave, unlike what the Jews are being forced to do with them.

The other thing that doesn’t seem to be taken into consideration is that it isn’t in Russia and China’s interests to see a general conflict in the Middle East, but there’s probably not much these outside parties can do to restrain the situation now that the Jews have shown they can’t be relied on to follow any deal or even behave with basic humanity.

A settler from Kiryat Bialik, north of occupied Haifa, told Zionist newspaper Maariv:

"We have never seen anything like this before, not even in 2006. We all assumed that there would be a response from Hezbollah, but we did not think it would be this strong, especially when… pic.twitter.com/NYK6gEwn7L

— vanessa beeley (@VanessaBeeley) September 22, 2024

I’m writing this on Sunday morning, so I have no idea what’s going to happen by the time this is published, but it looks like a major war is in the cards. Unfortunately, the U.S. military will probably be along for the ride.

The post Taking Things Too Far appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Video games can be fun. At various times in my life, I’ve had enough time to play them. Not right now, but sometimes I did. One of the game series I enjoyed was Dead Space. Essentially, you show up to a derelict outer space location where everyone is dead and horror ensues. The plot was great so I don’t want to give too much away in case you have time to play video games.

Perhaps this will be a plausible scenario for the International Space Station whenever whoever shows up to rescue those astronauts finally arrives. There’d really be no fun in playing a video game about starving to death in a can floating around the Earth. Pretty much the same thing goes for getting laid off from an engineering job so your aerospace company can hire black people instead. I’ve heard it’s getting tough in the job market even for white male engineers, but this is what one would expect as civilization collapses in on itself.

Boeing ousts head of troubled space unit after astronauts left stranded, billions in losses https://t.co/iS9A3wuii0 pic.twitter.com/kn286qHFqz

— New York Post (@nypost) September 20, 2024

Video game plots often involve abstractions, such as dystopian future scenarios. These were welcome distractions from real life, but now that the future arrives and the dystopia is something we live, the abstractions are less fun because we know what is actually going to happen. We know that they’ll hire the diversity and calamity will ensue. I’ve been writing about it for years and actually well before I started quoting the Bible and feeling crazy. This is no fun at all.

Diversity means dysfunction and when you put large, complicated flying machines into the scenario, it means these things will crash or at least pieces will fall off of them and kill people below. In other words, you can predict the calamity based on the simple formula of diversity + to whatever it’s being added. For example, if you add Haitians to automobiles, then everyone in the area will have their insurance premiums tripled. We’re talking about math here, and math is boring.

Let's have a close look at Boeing and DEI!

Boeing's corporate filings with the SEC reveal that in beginning 2022, the annual bonus plan to reward CEO and executives for increasing profit for shareholders and prioritizing safety was changed to reward them if they hit DEI targets. pic.twitter.com/kBU7wWw9Mk

— James Lindsay, anti-Communist (@ConceptualJames) January 10, 2024

The basic premise of much of the fiction I’ve been consuming my entire life is that while the future might be terrible, it’ll at least be exciting. You’ll be battling Skynet’s extermination robots through the rubble of LA, this sort of thing. The reality has turned out to be that the Jews will murder you by blowing up your pager, which was cutting edge technology when the original Terminator movie came out. To be honest, I’ve been nervous around my phone all week. It’s so diabolical but simultaneously lame.

Moreover, they’ll never stop bringing up stuff from the past that isn’t even true and furthermore is disproven now that they’re trying this thing they claimed happened in the past and it proves to be a disaster. As these poor bastards up in the space station remain stranded because Boeing is too diverse get them home or even stop parts from falling off its planes, Congress just cranked out yet another award for the black female secretaries from NASA they claimed programmed the moon missions. They’re not even alive anymore, but just like Emmet Till, the fake story never goes away.

The moon missions were possible because, back then, NASA was too racist to rely on diversity and had white male mathematicians with PhDs do the calculations. This is exactly what anyone sane and reasonable would expect. Why they’d rely on the least suitable demographic on this entire planet for math to program space missions defies all reasons until our End Times when there’s not even a mission because they can’t get the ship to work.

These black women were exactly what their job titles stated: secretaries. The area around the facility is quite black, so that was the labor pool from which NASA was hiring for these sorts of non-technical jobs that weren’t critical to the mission’s success. It wasn’t hiding anything until this absurd story was made up about them. Coastal and Central Virginia is full of blacks. NASA hired them instead of spending lots of money bringing in white secretaries from somewhere else.

It would be like if the Jews produced a movie about my life after I’m dead and made it about how the surly old black guy I pay to cut my lawn was actually the one who caught all the dogs and wrote all these ID articles. This would be ridiculous. Having to constantly maintain a straight face as we’re told all of this ridiculous shit is turning out to be one of the most challenging aspects of our unfolding future.

The post Future Fun appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Loyal Dixians often state a desire for the South to be a Christian country. We had better be sure that we understand what that entails.

Many wonderful visions come to mind: Churches full of parishioners singing hymns, receiving the holy mysteries, praying, etc.; families saying their prayers together at home in the morning and at night and before they eat their meals; the honoring of the saints of our forefathers; magistrates of the government carrying out their duties with the love of God and of their fellow citizens as their inspiration; and so forth.

But there is another side of this that is not so often spoken or thought of: suffering. This is inevitable for Christians, either as individuals, families, church congregations, or as the great family – the ethnos. The Holy Apostle Paul is explicit: ‘Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution’ (II Timothy 3:12).

If Dixie begins to walk the path of dedication solely to Christ, we will face opposition from the enemies of God. In a sense, this is old news. Southern love for the Holy Trinity brought upon us the wrath of the apostate Yankees in the War; and what remains of our love for God continues to animate the God-hating Yankees/globalists to make life as miserable for us as they are able.

Nevertheless, there is also a sense that an independent, Christian South will eliminate all of this once and for all; that, being separated from the Yankee/Leftist States will mean the appearance of a calm Golden Age.

Church history forbids such a fantasy. Two countries come quickly to mind: Serbia and Georgia. From the time of their baptisms, both have suffered frequent crucifixions by the enemies of the Church: pagan Persian fire-worshippers, Muslim Turks, communists, and others besides. Dixie has a certain kinship with both, owing to all three being conquered by anti-Christian powers, which we have described elsewhere. For Serbia, see this essay, as well as this one. For Georgia, see here and here. Yet they remain faithful to God, and He continues to resurrect them from the grave.

We turn once again to the history of Georgia to illustrate what awaits the South in one form or another if we walk the path of faithfulness to Christ. It is the story of the martyrs and princes Bidzini, Elizabar, and Shalvi (Feast Day 18 Sept.). In their time, Georgia was being forcefully resettled with foreigners (something Southerners can easily identify with):

In the 17th century the Persian aggressors razed churches, monasteries, and fortresses and drove out thousands of Georgian families to resettle them in remote provinces of Persia. The deserted territories were settled by Turkic tribes from Central Asia. In the chronicle The Life of Kartli it is written: “The name of Christ was not allowed to be uttered, except in a handful of mountainous regions: Tusheti, Pshavi, and Khevsureti.”

The Lord, as He so often does, raised up leaders to help the Georgians in their time of dire need:

But the All-merciful Lord aroused a strong desire in the valiant prince Bidzina Choloqashvili of Kakheti and, together with Shalva and his uncle Elizbar, princes of Aragvi and Ksani provinces, he led a struggle to liberate Kakheti from the Tatars. (The Persian governor of Kakheti, Salim Khan (1656-1664), had been encouraging the Tatar tribesmen to profane the Christian churches.)

With the help of God and one of His most renowned saints – the Patron Saint of Georgia, in fact – the holy princes routed the Persians and praised their Holy Benefactors:

On the moonless night of September 15, 1659, the feast of the Alaverdi church (The feast of Saint Joseph of Alaverdi) the united army of all eastern Georgia assembled and crossed over the mountains, past the village of Akhmeta, and launched a surprise attack on the Persians from Bakhtrioni Fortress and Alaverdi Church. The invader’s armies were so utterly crushed that their leader, Salim Khan, the Persian governor of Kakheti, barely succeeded in escaping from the avengers, after he had abandoned his family and army.

The victorious Georgian army offered prayers of thanksgiving to the Lord God and Great-martyr George, the protector of the Georgian people, who had appeared visibly to all during the battle, riding his white horse like a flash of lightning and leading the Georgians to victory.

But the celebration of victory was short-lived. Torments and death awaited them at the command of Shah Abbas II and his underlings:

. . . the enraged Salim Khan, the vassal of Shah Abbas, ordered the beheading of Elizbar and Shalva, hoping by this to break Bidzina’s resolve. But his efforts were in vain. “There is nothing sweeter than death for Christ’s sake!” Bidzina proclaimed.

The Ksani princes calmly bowed their heads, but the undersized executioners could not reach the stately princes with their swords. So the shah’s henchmen hacked each of the princes in two at the shins, then decapitated them after they had fallen to an accessible height.

But even the murder of his companions would not cause Saint Bidzina’s will to waver. So the enemies resolved to break his will by mockery. They draped the bound prince in a chadar (the veil worn by Muslim women), seated him on a donkey, and paraded him through the streets. Then they began to butcher him alive. One by one they cut off his fingers and toes, then they chopped off his hands and feet, then his arms and legs, until only his head remained unharmed. It was clear from the movement of his lips that the holy martyr was praying.

Then one of the persecutors pierced his heart with a spear. This happened in the year 1661. The mutilated bodies of the holy martyrs remained under the open sky for one day, and no one was permitted to go near them.

At the end of it all, once again the Heavenly Father exalted His children:

During the night they were illumined by a brilliant light. Then a group of Christians secretly buried the saints’ remains. Several years later Saint Shalva’s wife Ketevan and son David sent several of the faithful to Persia to bring back their relics. Crowds of believers gathered at the Kartli border to meet the holy relics and accompany them with hymns of rejoicing to their final resting place at the Ikorta Church of the Archangels.

And through many other tribulations, the Christian country of Georgia still stands, still fights the good fight, having just recently passed a raft of legislation to ban the LGBT cult and its promotion in the Georgian land.

All of this is what the South must expect if we choose faithfulness to Christ: a never-ending battle with the world and the devil, victories and defeats, heroes and traitors, glory, death, and resurrection, perpetual martyrdom. There is certainly no crown greater than that given to the victorious martyrs of Christ. Should Southrons earn them in contests with the demons and their human allies, it will be to our everlasting glory as a people. But are we ready for those contests? That is the essential question we must answer as we stand at the threshold of a collapse of the demonic Yankee Empire and the birth of a free South with a Christian future before her.

-By Walt Garlington

The post Recurring Martyrdom appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Recently, I was fortunate to celebrate another wedding anniversary, nearly four decades. And I couldn’t help but reflect on how it all began—how it mirrors our Southern national movement. As you get older, you tend to analyze the paths taken and how they transformed your original trajectory and the broader scope of your life.

It all started with a bang!

In an instant I fell in love, no other had been more beautiful to me than she. I’m sure many of you fell in love with Dixie the same way. There you were, minding your own business, not looking for anything special, and there she was, right in front of your eyes. She was all of a sudden everywhere, all around, in your every thought. She was without blemish, and you were shocked when others could not see that beauty, or worse, did not care. With even an errant thought of some imperfection in her by another man, you were ready for pistols at dawn.

When you are captivated by young love, it seems every conversation is about the future. You envision a perfect life going forward, nothing can convince you otherwise, and the greatest triumph of that love is children. From the start, I wanted as many children as the Lord would provide. Love naturally wants to expand beyond its initial boundaries. Procreation is natural. Passing on your genes to another generation ensures the future; it makes you immortal. If you are an active participant in our movement, you are passing those physical and ideological genes onto the next generation. You are securing a future for our people, an existence out of love for the Southland.

I remember the excitement and terror of finding out my wife was pregnant for the first time. We were relatively poor, early twenties, not ready in any way, but we knew God was faithful. And when he came, that little, blonde-haired, blue-eyed boy was perfect! God had given us a soul to train up in the way he should go, so that when he was old, he should not depart. I am happy to report all went well, even to this day. As evangelists for our people, our objective is birthing and converting more of our kindred, and those conversions come with responsibilities. We are only in the fledgling stages of our resurrection as a sovereign nation, and raising our children to carry on after us is our first priority.

Personally, I am in the second stage of ensuring a future for Dixie, grandchildren, but more specifically, grandsons. God has blessed me with four little warriors, and God willing, many more. My little tribe of Southerners has expanded from two to well over a dozen; our family is a dedicated force multiplier for our people. That’s how this all works! As we procreate committed ideological Southerners, detached from Americanism, we reforge our particular tribe. Families have identities, and in coherent societies you are known by your family name.

We are a noble people; that is our identity. And in the providence of God, we have been tried by fire and emerged more noble out of the flames of conquest. Christ is raising up an army to retake our homeland for His glory. Southern men will lead the way. Prepare your families. Restore lines that have been broken, as the Scriptures say, “a threefold chord is not soon broken.” Men of the South, fathers, sons, and grandsons, bind yourselves together, put away frivolous things. Pursue holiness, and become warriors in mind, body, and spirit.

This is not the trajectory I considered nearly sixty years ago, but to God’s glory, this is the path I am on, and this is the path our people are on.

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post Birthing a Nation, The Path Forward appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

When I speak with patriotic Republicans who genuinely believe America is a free country, I list and compare the freedoms we now lack but our Founders enjoyed. After going through the transformations we suffered over the last two centuries, it is clear we oppose both the Founders and liberty, and further, what we call liberty a medieval might well view as slavery. But my interlocutors will often fall back on “we’re not as bad as most countries today,” which to them justifies their acceptance of and compliance with the current system. Sometimes it seems the only thing worth saving in America, according to its defendants, is it could be worse. This is true, as each day seems to prove, but we Americans should have, and we really need, a brighter, more radical vision. This article will focus on how things would look if we implemented my ideal political system today.

Having spent a great deal of time defending and describing the feudal kingships of the Middle Ages, one might think it is my ideal political system, but it is not. It is my favored historical system but not my ideal. I certainly would not desire a return to some of the tribal customs maintained then even after the Christian conversion. But one thing I love about those systems is they were organic; they derived from certain circumstances arising in the period. They were built up from the bottom, not forced down from the top. They were great systems for their time, situation, and need, but today we are in vastly different ones, and thus, in need of a new system as well. However, my ideals do look more similar to the kingships of the Middle Ages.

One of the central tenets of my ideal governance is consent. I would not wish to force anyone into a system they disagreed with. Thus, from the start, it would run into the problem of the vast majority of Americans immediately seceding from my system. However, to consider my ideas more robustly, we will assume they have been established and accepted across the nation.

In my system, self-governance is vital; the government is made to benefit man, not man to benefit the government. So, if a group of people wished to secede and become autonomous at any future time, they would be unhindered in doing so. All the land, and the law, is the peoples; they own it, with the government as its steward – its protector and enforcer for those people. The law and government only exist to serve the people. Many modern social ills and examples of mistreatment of people are due to the lack of self-governance. Would minorities impose harsh laws of discrimination on themselves? No majority or governmental power could oppress them if they were allowed to split off independently to govern themselves; thus, secession is always legal in my system. Further the only way to achieve self-governance within a country of diverse opinions is via decentralization, to which we will now turn.

The first step in implementing my system would be to abolish the state and all current centralized authority. Each county or each town would become completely autonomous. And if a section of a town wishes to form a new village, they are free to do so. People can seek self-governance no matter how small the minority; no majority can dictate to or steal their right to self-governance. Even a single family can create an area with their laws and customs to live by if they wish to be isolated.

This would result in thousands of diverse governmental systems people could choose from and move to. It would enable everyone to have the government of their choosing. In one town, we could have a libertarian society, the next might be communist, but neither could outvote or impose their ways on the other. They would have no authority over a smaller minority group. One area might be purely democratic where the majority decides all matters, and may have elections and politics. The next area could be monarchist, devoid of all political strife and action. Some towns might be progressive and have written laws, allowing their law to evolve or change over time. Others might be conservative with unwritten customs lived out and never changing no matter what a future majority within this section or its rulers desire, ensuring a constant law/liberty for the people within. They would not need to worry about elections, rulers, and so on since nothing could alter their customs.

In this system, the totalitarian community is just as free to live as they desire as a libertarian society. Everyone has perfect equality to control their own destiny. Between the realms, there would be no need for strife, hatred, anger, discord, etc., since each section is powerless to impose its ways on another. A society built upon the Democratic Party would never have to fear Donald Trump. A Republican society would be free of another Joe Biden. No one would have to get angry with or outspend the other over politics. No one would have to donate money, spend time fighting, arguing, or slavishly discrediting opponents; and everyone would get self-governance. One section wanting legal abortion would never have to worry about Christians taking away their “rights,” while a Christian village can follow God’s commands and outlaw the procedure.

It would be comparable to each brand of every political party winning each election. You could join a “Republican area,” a “Democratic area,” a “conservative” area, a “liberal” area, and so forth. There would be thousands of areas to choose from. We would have Catholic Republican areas, Catholic Democrat and libertarian areas, Mormon areas, Baptists, secular, Methodist, and on and on. Some towns might allow immigration; another might allow visitors, traders, and temporary workers; the next might outlaw all entry by outsiders. Libertarians who never have a chance at election success could have multiple areas with their own policies. Libertarians differ on subjects like drugs, abortion, and police yet under this system they could have multiple areas with various policies on these issues. Diversity would be embraced and protected under the law.

One objection might be, for example, as a libertarian-minded individual in Vermont, it might be a challenge to find a like-minded village. But do I need to stay in the state? If millions of people can cross the world to enter America illegally, legal movement within the country can be accomplished relatively easily. Thousands of libertarians associated with the free state project are already moving to New Hampshire, though they’re receiving far fewer benefits than my idea would offer. Further, the options becoming available as we created these new areas would be much better for a libertarian than the current situation. There are a few Republican counties within my very liberal state and one might even be described as conservative. Further, as one town or county formed its own polity, like-minded people would gravitate to it. Around 3,700 people in Vermont voted libertarian last presidential election. There could easily be a libertarian town in Vermont!

If I were to create my own realm within this rearranged America, it would look very similar to J.R.R. Tolkien’s Shire. We would rid ourselves of bureaucrats, politicians, lawyers, and legislation. A local lord would pass down the crown hereditarily. The lord must be someone who does not seek the position and so would essentially be “forced” into it, and honored for serving the people. He could never have been involved with politics, and never have held a place of power such as a boss, preferably having been a servant. Ideally, he would be someone who donates to nonprofits, and volunteers, or coaches a local sports team. The lord/king must also have numerous offspring to ensure a healthy and continued line. Ideally, he would be placed in power similarly to how Saint Martin became the bishop of Tours.[1] The position would not be premeditated, sought after, or desired but a duty or service performed by someone sacrificing for his people.

Regarding its laws, my realm would be a form of libertarian Christendom. The laws governing everyone, including the lord of the realm, would be set in stone, like the Ten Commandments. Man – neither present nor future king or majority – could alter them. Like Christ,[2] I would not force other areas to be like ours. Further, diversity would reign, and the families or local authorities would handle almost everything; one property might govern itself vastly differently from the next.

The laws would be very anarcho-monarchist since the moral culture would primarily govern people rather than laws. The vast majority of Christian governance would come from the families, not the government. People would not steal because they would respect others, putting others above themselves. They would not abort their children because they would view them as made in God’s image. They would rarely need lawyers or laws because people would honor their word; instead of months of paperwork and thousands of dollars, a handshake would settle private transactions. Those severely violating the customs could face expulsion or the death penalty.

It would not be a libertarian retreat for someone who does not want their society regulated by the basic tenets of Christianity. Thieves, rapists, and murderers would find this realm more oppressive than a democracy. We would outlaw abortion. No public support (thereby showing acceptance) of it would be allowed. This does not mean everyone must be Christian; or non-Christians would not be welcome, it just means society, laws, customs, and public displays would be Christian. Muslims would lack the same status and freedom because they would not have the same influence on society and laws as Christians. Thus, we also need areas where they can do the same as Christians in my realm, attain self-governance and have a realm guided by the Koran and Hadiths.

My disagreement with libertarians and, in part, the American Founders is their elevation of liberty above God. The founders allowed man’s natural sinful impulses to rule while dismissing the idea of a purposeful Christian nation. They undermined the foundation for liberty by not placing the King of Kings on the nation’s throne, thus ensuring eventual secular tyranny. I do not think everyone should have the liberty to do as they please. There is genuinely right and wrong; a realm should be based on this rather than personal beliefs and opinions. As the Apostle Paul said in Romans 3:4, “let God be true and every man a liar.”

No men, corporations, or businesses could become so powerful as to manipulate or control others. Preferably no one would be working for another as an hourly slave-wager (besides apprentices who could use other means of payment.) It would be a distributist society where the land and resources are initially distributed evenly to each member. Foresters might prefer the wooded land and utilize those resources; fishermen want access to a lake or river, farmers to open grazing land, and so on. None could consume another’s property, land, or resources, and no one could “buy out” another. They would all be responsible for their lands and developing their own plots of land and could not attain more; if the land is abandoned, a new owner (or a descendant of another plot of land perhaps) who wishes to join the realm applies for it, or perhaps, it could be shared land so long as every individual approved of its new purpose.

Everyone would have the resources available to provide for themselves and live completely self-sufficient, not needing welfare or money from working for another. This does not exclude hiring tradespeople, bartering, and so forth, or some form of a money economy (no paper money or at least all money must be backed by something like gold), but generally everyone can provide for themselves. Being completely self-sufficient is available to all.

A natural aristocracy would develop and some would become “better off” due to hard work, intelligence differences, chance etc., but it would be more of a cultural and religious aristocracy. In my society, there would be no government-controlled welfare; people would be free to work less and enjoy leisure, scrape by for a living, or work hard and garner more material things. But no coercive measures would force one to pay for another and cause division or dependence. If someone does fall into poverty or near starvation, they receive no help from the government. However, churches, families, and neighbors can judge the situation and help if they choose to do so. The hope is that charity would blossom, good deeds would proliferate, and love and a sense of community would flourish as people willingly helped their neighbor. Instead of anger, love would be cultivated. With people now freed from regulations and taxation, their money will not be filtered through the greedy hands of bureaucrats, politicians, and corporations. Thus, they could better afford charity for one another.

Moving beyond my preferred realm and at the head of this national system (my realm is just one tiny village or county) is a hereditary king, one born to the position, not one who would seek it. He received no extra power or money for any action he took, and the nobility could give no favors to any section of the country. He only rules within his own realm, which is the standard size of the thousands of mini kingdoms across the nation. He might be a true monarch within his realm or not, depending on the people’s desires, but his only real job at the national level would be to ensure one realm does not invade another and to protect/help fight off invasion. But even here, he would not be in command of all the armies across the country but only of his own little realm. The king would have his autonomous realm from which he derived his funds and soldiers. The king’s only policy with foreign nations would be to ensure free trade (though individual realms could impose tariffs within their spheres). No taxation across the nation would ever be imposed or could be; the king’s realm must be self-sufficient by taxation within his realm.

We would remove or sell all our military bases, foreign territory, military personnel, foreign aid etc., and bring them back home. We would avoid war at all costs and seek friendship with other nations. We would not go to war unless invaded on our own territory. We would not subjugate any nation we did go to war with, even after victory. At best, we would seek compensation for losses and put another foreign nation/ally in charge or, more desirable, the nation itself back in command. While we would desire to be friendly with all nations, we would avoid alliances forcing us into another war. At all costs, we would attempt to live peacefully.

Some realms within the country might have conscription, but nationally there would be none. It would be the king’s duty to muster men in his realm and lead them into war. He calls on the realms (as do the local lords, presidents, governors etc. of the other realms) for help. But it is up to each autonomous area to decide if they will send help. If they do not deem the invasion a threat or think the war unjust, they are under no obligation to help. It may be if we come under invasion, 50% of the realms conscript and send all the aid they can, 25% ignore the call for aid, and 25% send only willing volunteers and donations.

What about civil wars? If one autonomous area cannot subjugate another by voting, what is to prevent them from doing so by military invasion? This is where the only aspect of domestic centralization occurs. In my “national” system, the king’s realm and every autonomous area would have a force (if they chose), and the leaders of each realm would take an oath upon coming to their position never to invade another territory and to help defend other realms from invasion – if it was not contrary to their own local laws and ideals. So if one area invaded another, it would be the oath-bound duty of every one of the perhaps tens of thousands of realms to send help and fight off the invader. Further, the hope is due to the removal of politics; each section would have no reason to hate another and would also see strength in unity. By fighting for another realm, they are really protecting themselves because they are defending their right to be self-governed; if they were invaded, they would also want help. Hopefully, the blessing of attaining actual self-governance would be a motivator to comply. I imagine extensive volunteers coming forth, a few small but well-trained armies able to assist. Even if only 10% of realms responded, any attempted invader would be drastically outnumbered. It does not make expansion an enticing option.

To begin with, each realm would have agreed not to invade or impose on another, with a chance of losing their self-governance for a repeat offense. The care of their realm would go to the people they attempted to invade, perhaps permanently. But this “new” realm would be autonomous from the realm being invaded, to avoid building up power blocs.

One odd objection to restitution monarchy I have come across is some believe plagues and diseases would return as if they are connected to monarchy. Democracies and republics in the Middle Ages or ancient world did not magically invent modern technology and medicines, and modern monarchies do not outlaw hospitals and ensure poor sanitation practices. Further, the Black Death came in the later Middle Ages as we adopted Roman, republican and parliamentary systems. In America, under my system, (I would assume) most realms would be republics or democracies, so fear no plagues!!! Just as I do not desire to implement everything about medieval society, neither do I wish to remove everything about modern society; we can keep the good about both and trash the rest.

My thinking might seem outdated, but I am, in fact, far more progressive than progressives are. They seek only to change the existing structure into the old 19th-century tired white man’s ideas of socialism and communism. They slowly implement their plan over time. They are reactionary, as they want to bring America back in time to a more tame version of the totalitarian states of the previous century. I am revolutionary in seeking to “evolve” and “progress” past the hate- and division-causing politics. I wish to abolish the great evil of our time, the beast primarily arising from the Renaissance to the French Revolution. I want to abolish man’s idea he is above other men and God’s law—something we have struggled with since Genesis 3. I want to move us to a future devoid of our current evils and political structures. I am the opposite of a conservative; I wish to conserve nothing of what is evil; our entire system has become corrupt. I want to abolish democracy and legislative governments as the abolitionists in America were “progressive” in abolishing the evil of their day, slavery. Could my scenario possibly be implemented today? One thing we know by now is modern states do not relinquish power. They seek only to increase it. The only way my idea could happen would be to get a town or county to secede and begin their own realm. I do not pretend to think this could happen without the government unleashing its hammer on any serfs attempting to escape its hold – but just as almost everyone knows it would be taken as a dangerous, severely punishable offense, it also serves well to reveal the depths of our servitude to our modern governments; and it is all the more reason to try.

[1] (Campbell 2021, 16)

[2] Matthew 10:14

The post Implementing Monarchy Today appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I guess I could just copy-paste the last thing I wrote about this exactly two months ago, because the analysis remains unchanged – except we are now beyond the crocodile tear “we all deplore (unsuccessful) violence” stage, and onto snide gloating that they really only have to be right once to rid the world of Orange Hitler.

Bro that’s crazy, his son clarifies – “I mean yeah good for him on killing trump or whatever I just didn’t think he’d go for it.” Pause for a quick hit on the weed vape.

Ryan Routh’s Ukrainian connections, where he at least purported to be raising funds and volunteers (including smuggling abandoned ex-Afghan National Army soldiers to be Ukrainian mercenaries), appeared in Azov propaganda videos, and met with the defense ministry, are too obvious to ignore. Given the massive support the US intelligence services have provided via the same mechanisms, it would be absurd to claim they didn’t also have him “on their radar”.

One would think that if he were shepherded into this, and the attempt was meant to succeed, a sponsor would be able to provide him with something more suitable that the janky bubba’d SKS he ended up using (although it is an open question how exactly he knew where Trump would be – his golfing appearance was not public, although it may have been inferable from other public information. Although on the other hand, that would suggest a level of competency belied by his choice of equipment). But I do not think that this was “meant to succeed”, in the sense of a realistic plot where real resources were put into making it effective. His demeanor in public media appears at least slightly delusional, and the Joker hair coloring doesn’t help – this is not Jason Bourne lobbing 338’s over the horizon.

Instead, this is precisely the kind of swinging-at-the-pinata I described in the previous article. It may be that the Ukrainians have decided they are default screwed and might as well roll the dice on sponsoring some loons to prevent a Trump presidency. They are already somewhat notorious for placing critics on requested freelance kill lists. It may be that someone in the broader DHS or Secret Service infrastructure (or FAA, which has responsibility for clearing the airspace when Trump is present, or a local cop, or etc.) tipped him off not as part of a concrete plot, but as a “might as well” wall-spaghetti effort. It could be this man was just convinced by the libtard zeitgeist to Do Something because, per the Kamala campaign slogan he regurgitated, Democracy Is On the Ballot.

The fact is that the present power structure is set up to encourage these attacks until one succeeds. This makes at least number six or so since 2016 – the teen who grabbed a security officer’s gun (sentenced to just a year and a day, btw), the stage-rush in the airport hanger, the cancelled Chicago rally, the Summer of Floyd attack on the White House, his wounding in July, and now this. It’s clear the ambient level of violence is not going down until it is made to go down.

So, pray that Trump succeeds and has the vision to properly assert control over the situation, or at least put competent hatchet men in charge. As loyal as his supporters are, logistically they cannot form a human shield, and tactically Trump must continue campaigning. He relies on real people voting, so he cannot replicate the Biden basement strategy. He and we are, fittingly, like conscripts on either side of the Kursk pocket – every day is just another gamble.

-By Hank Oslo

The post It Happened Again appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Historically speaking, the purpose of voting was largely to provide some form of “revolutionary” capacity to change the leadership of a people without violence. The higher powers might not allow the decision (i.e., fix an election) or may offer false choices, but the goal was to ameliorate the passions of the citizenry. In effect, every two, four, or six years, the American republic provided a vote that at least made the people believe things might change without the need for guns. Occasionally, minor changes seemed great to a populace used to nominal differences in a continual slide toward globalism.

Now comes Trump – yet again. This short article is not about Trump, per se. Rather, it is about the continual belief in voting as a form of implementing change. More importantly, it is about the moment in which that belief no longer exists. Trump may or may not “win” in November, but his victory would likely be empty because of the design of the system itself (assuming a billionaire New Yorker is not in on it).

There are a great many Baby Boomers who believe in voting and Trump because they have been conditioned for generations to believe voting works. It also helps (them) that politics have been dominated almost exclusively by Boomer candidates for about 40 years. GenXers – statistically the most hard right generation – seem to be increasingly more disillusioned with voting. Millennials – statistically the most far left demographic – seem to have a more activist mindset toward voting. GenZers – the most deeply divided demographic – seem to have given up on the exercise entirely (not unlike GenX).

Cumulatively, it is clear that voting – a process dominated by one generation for almost half a century – is losing its grasp on future generations. That is dangerous for ruling elites. If the people feel they have no voice or method to air grievances, the alternative has historically been violence. The ruling class understands this.

Correspondingly, it is not an accident that total societal change has been inspired to emasculate the populace. Younger men not only have lower testosterone levels year over year (I personally believe due to some form of chemical introduction), but masculinity itself is under constant attack. Transgenderism is simply a byproduct of the war on men. Notice that the females harmed by the transgender movement are athletic women who would be inclined to gravitate toward athletic men, creating genetically athletic offspring. The totality of the movement to emasculate – from girl power narratives to deconstructing masculine social structures to promoting effeminate males (e.g., “Big Bang Theory” television show) to transgender therapies for boys in schools – is part of a defensive posture to guard against the consequences of an eventual collapse of voting.

When voting fails, populations rise violently. It is helpful to have a nation of emasculated men if you want to remain a tyrant. After all, it is hard to shoot at the ruling class with your legs crossed, sipping on a Pumpkin Spiced Latte, and wearing a dress.

The post When Voting Fails appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

We live in a place where everything is premised on lies. Literally everything, right down to why we have bad weather. This makes information management a challenge for the power structure that’s presiding over the ongoing implosion that nobody is supposed to notice. To be fair, there’s no good way to successfully explain to everyone that something isn’t happening right before their very eyes.

There’s a certain percentage of white people this will actually work on, because they have a need to feel intelligent, moral, and sophisticated. They will thus internalize as truth what is marketed to them as what the intelligent, moral, and sophisticated white people understand. This will also be held in contrast to what the proles believe, whom they hold in contempt. If you require a frightening proof of concept on just how far these pretentious creatures are willing to go, look no further than the COVID injections.

Its therefore quite easy to convince them that Haiti is actually a nice place and any troubles it might be experiencing are the result of misfortunes imposed on Haitians. These same white people would believe that the crime and dysfunction in the black neighborhood they avoid is a result of socioeconomic factors.

None of this is a function of IQ. Thus, a white person with a rather low IQ but no pretensions is capable of understanding that the problems in that black neighborhood are the result of black people, which is why all black areas have the same problems, and realizes that if these same black people were stuck on an island and left largely to themselves, Haiti is what happens. None of those problems have anything to do with the gold Haiti paid to France two centuries ago, either.

Here is a short compilation I put together of car accidents caused by Haitian drivers in Springfield, Ohio.

Every resident I’ve talked to is scared of driving, and they are dealing with increased insurance rates due to unlicensed and uninsured Haitian drivers causing multiple… pic.twitter.com/29LKnBPCpe

— Tayler Hansen (@TaylerUSA) September 12, 2024

There are also the white people with a higher IQ who notice obvious things and are capable of considering these things systemically. Many of us now realize that bringing Haiti to America is part of a set of actions being taken against our existence. In the very least, we all recognize that importing Haitians will cause serious problems of which we will never rid ourselves, just like the black people we already have. This is why we’re labeled the preeminent threat to America’s national security.

In other words, these two latter categories of white people can’t be fooled by manipulating their pretensions. This often causes the pretentious white people I first described to lose their minds in anger. This was a big component of Trump Derangement Syndrome back in 2016, pretentious white people working themselves into a fury at the proles for not being able to perceive the correct things about Donald Trump.

We can currently observe this phenomenon at work with the subject of Haitians. The principal issue with the Haitians is that when you flood people incapable of functioning in what’s left of our civilization into a particular municipality, this location is going to experience skyrocketing problems. This process is as sure as gravity. Just because Haiti isn’t literally a hole filled with shit like Donald Trump said back in 2018 doesn’t make Haitians compatible with America.

To these proper white people however, problematic Haitians are a debunked conspiracy theory. So, all of the media is going on nonstop with condescension about how it’s a debunked conspiracy theory that Haitians are causing problems in Ohio because Donald Trump repeated a baseless rumor that they were eating people’s pets.

Just like they’ve been doing since 2016, the pretentious keep repeating this line with exasperation thinking it should finally work on the proles, yet it doesn’t which clearly upsets them. The only thing the constant condescension achieves is to rile up the proles about the issue, which exasperates the pretentious even more. This part is hilarious because it’s as if they never learn and must keep themselves on the hamster wheel instead. These creatures deserve to suffer, and I think it’s funny.

MAJOR GARRETT: Is anyone in Ohio "eating dogs & cats illegally?" (Strange way to word the question)

GOV. DEWINE: "No evidence of that at all."

pic.twitter.com/OI2VHltxgf

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) September 12, 2024

Deriding something that is actually happening as a debunked conspiracy theory is the standard initial information management tool of our power structure. Like I said, to be fair there’s no good way to deny something that’s obviously true. Still, one would think they’d be more creative than repeating the same tactic that never works over and over again. To be honest, I can’t come up with a better tactic for them to attempt.

The sad part is that there are a series of other tools that get applied to these situations which aren’t known to the public. For example, a federal task force descends on the victims and public officials when atrocities are committed by migrants in a particular municipality. I’m not sure exactly what gets said to them, but it’s reasonable to expect that a set of incentives and consequences are implied. I’d imagine the incentives are for the politicians and officials while the consequences are for the victims.

The parents of Aiden Clark say they wish he had been killed by an older white man, instead of a Haitian, because they say his death has been used to spread hate towards migrants. Aiden’s father asks for Republicans to stop using his death for political reasons. pic.twitter.com/jzlzm5EI9q

— TheBlaze (@theblaze) September 10, 2024

At least he didn’t talk about the great food like Mollie Tibbits’ father. This man’s comments on his murdered son are both incredible and disturbing but they should be understood in this context. From what I’ve heard, he received a visit from the Feds. Whenever there’s a situation like a city in Ohio with 58,000 residents suddenly receiving around 20,000 Haitians, in the background are various federal agencies and NGOs facilitating and managing the operation. This also applies to the information space.

They’re also at work when it comes to potential jobs and government services. This is how Haitians can be depicted as doing jobs the local residents are too lazy to consider. In reality, the local residents don’t even know about these jobs because an NGO gets ahead of them in connecting the migrants with employment. At a macro level, this is how most of the job growth in America goes to immigrants. The same thing goes for housing and other benefits.

Eye-witness account from Springfield, Ohio. pic.twitter.com/TfgCtnUkgs

— Pastor Mathis (@ShawnMathis1972) September 11, 2024

The Haitians can’t wreck Ohio on their own. Under that scenario, at best they might be able to drift over to Florida where in a sane America they’d be detained for deportation. Behind the scenes, there’s an enormous, coordinated effort to get them to Ohio and then ensconce them in the community just as there is to feed them in Haiti so they can reproduce and come to America. They can’t do that on their own, either.

Indeed, the biggest lie that Americans are expected to believe about these situations is that they happen spontaneously as if a need arose in the economy or something which somehow attracted a bunch of migrants to a particular municipality. I suppose the upside is that there’s no way to keep a lid on migration of this proportion to a particular place. What we’re seeing in Ohio happens in Europe and the governments over there can’t erase the outrage.

Of course, outrage doesn’t get Western governments to change their course of action on migration so expect this to keep happening and prepare to be living in a Third World country. I’ve been to a bunch, and lemme tell ya, it’ll be quite the adjustment for the average American.

Springfield, OH City Manager Bryan Heck is responding to reports of pets being stolen and eaten by Haitian migrants in his tiny community. Do you believe him?
Listen to the spin.
Our @FrontlinesTPUSA team is on the ground trying to get to the bottom of this. pic.twitter.com/BI9kDn71vV

— Jonathan Choe (@choeshow) September 11, 2024

The post A Foreign Menu appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I spent this past year doing lots of business in the Philippines, often in large cities I would advise anyone to avoid if they intend to visit for tourism purposes. It’s an interesting place with a lot of opportunities, but it’s fraught with serious problems as well. Poverty, security, and infrastructure come to mind immediately. None of these things can be addressed through conflict with China.

It’s also comprised of thousands of islands, so the last thing this country needs is to be used by Uncle Sam as a proxy against China with the pretext being some other islands of no existential importance to Filipinos. It’s true that the Spratly Islands are rather far from the Chinese mainland, but they’ve considered it their territory for centuries and this is of no concern to Americans. A number of countries have islands that are closer to other countries than their own.

The reason China has been building fortifications is that it doesn’t want the United States to have its proxies occupy the islands and fortify them. The American Empire has proven to be extremely aggressive in what it will get its proxies to do against targeted nations. One only has to look at the situation Russia now has on its hands to realize that China’s fears are not unfounded.

Without the backing and encouragement of the Uncle Sam, the Filipinos wouldn’t be getting into kinetic confrontations with the Chinese over these islands. This should be pretty obvious since they don’t have the wherewithal to take on China by themselves and also stand to gain a great deal through cooperation with China.

In my experience, the average Chinese person has a much better grasp than the average American of what’s going on with America both in terms of its actions on the global stage and who’s in charge around here. The Chinese were rightfully quite alarmed at both the scale of what Uncle Sam has done in Ukraine but also the idiotic recklessness of it. They all understand that if Russia succumbed, they’d be next.

From a rational perspective, there’s no reason to have a war over the Taiwan issue. However, there’s nothing rational about the Jews who control America and in China there’s an understanding that the Jews control America. So, the same conclusion could’ve been reached by a rational individual about the situation in Ukraine but then look what happened. China is run by Chinese, and they’re allowed to say obvious facts even if a leader like Xi wouldn’t state such an unpolite truth in public.

The Chinese strategy since the Korean War has always been to avoid a direct confrontation with Uncle Sam just like the Russians. They don’t need conflict to achieve their long-term goals just like the Russians were satisfied with negotiating an arrangement to keep Ukraine as a single country even after Uncle Sam overthrew the government in order to install a hostile entity.

Russia has gone through incredible lengths to avoid a direct conflict with Uncle Sam to the point where it’s tolerated an invasion of Kursk conducted with Uncle Sam’s full backing. One of the main criticisms of Putin is that the whole reason this incredible act of provocation took place is that he wasn’t willing to strike back directly at the American Empire despite everything which has been done to Russia since 2014. All that he receives in return is the understanding that Uncle Sam can do anything to Russia.

If the United States is killing Russian personnel on Russian land with American weapons, Putin has all the justification he needs to retaliate in a way that might put the aggression to an end. The war stops tomorrow without American support. Instead, what happens is an escalating set of provocations. There’s a clear logic to Putin’s critics and so the Chinese have to be calculating how much they’re going to put up with before they act because not acting won’t stop the aggression.

American military personnel are all over Taiwan these days, but mostly out of uniform. I’ve seen all of this stuff up close. Does China calculate that it has to act to preempt the United States from creating an arrangement with Taiwan in the style of NATO and stationing personnel permanently on the island? Again, if such actions seem too reckless for the Chinese to consider, look what happened in Ukraine. Taiwanese leaders go to the AIT fortress in Taipei to take orders, so whatever happens is actually up to these Jews in DC who gave the Kursk invasion a go-ahead.

I’ve written articles for this publication in the past about why a war over Taiwan doesn’t make any sense for China. However, it starts making some sense when one considers just how deeply irrational the Jews in charge of America have become. Why did they approve an invasion of Russia as the Houthis are defeating the U.S. Navy and Iran could flatten Israel at any time? When the mask comes off, one realizes there doesn’t seem to be a rational limit to their conduct even as the temple starts to come down on their own heads.

What sense does it make to open up a third global front with no chance of success as the first two are proving to be catastrophic? Why are they doing such a stupid thing? While these are pertinent questions, the salient fact is that they keep doing these stupid things. Thus, the Chinese can’t rely on patience and restraint to see them through this bout of Jewish madness.

The Russians have put up with being humiliated and look where that’s getting them. Likewise, this has been the Chinese strategy over Taiwan. In return for tolerating all of the provocations over Taiwan, what China receives is the United States trying to push further against them in the South China Sea, returning its military presence to the Philippines and doing its best to thwart Chinese investments in the country.

I genuinely hope there’s no direct conflict because that could lead to domestic catastrophe. However, I will acknowledge that the Russian and Chinese strategy of dealing with aggression by showing restraint is essentially a failure at stopping a set of escalating provocations towards direct conflict. As these provocations continue to escalate, the chances of confrontation increase as they realize that some blow has to be landed against the U.S. military to put this to an end.

The Jews in DC have clearly already wagered that the Russians and Chinese don’t have the balls to risk World War 3 by retaliating but what if they’re becoming reconciled to the inevitability and decide Uncle Sam doesn’t have the balls, either? We’ll see because we’re not going to stop pushing them towards the edge.

The post The Invisible Limits of Pushing appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

It has been a while since I have posted anything. I have had quite a good bit going on this year, so I may as well take advantage of some free time and tell y’all some of my thoughts on things I have been pondering lately. It is pretty wild having the opportunity to be born during one of those horrendously dark and macabre periods of history when a massive empire in total freefall is tripping over itself to become exponentially worse with each passing day. Plenty of excellent essays exist on this pathetic excuse for a country’s decay, so I will instead talk about horrible things I see daily.

Why are names so awful and cringeworthy now? I honestly do not believe middle-class White women and suburbanites can give their children actual names anymore. No, Braylin, Brysten, Tayley, Kinsley, Noli, Nova, Kaibryanna, and other suburbanite nonsense are NOT real names. People are so disconnected from the past and their heritage that they have to make up obnoxious words to give to their kids as names. Your children should have names that they can be proud of and have actual meanings.

Wew boy, this makes me sound like an old codger. Young’uns have no manners anymore. There is not much to say about this one. Parents, especially White parents, spoil their kids too much. In fact, our youth are literal shells of what constitutes a human being. It is existentially worrisome and even a bit uncanny. This is very much a result of the spoiling, social media, degeneracy, depravity, and lack of character developing experiences. They have no unique personalities of their own and only seek to drink and live vicariously through TikTok. None of their mannerisms or speech patterns are organic in nature but come entirely from that godforsaken app. The way they speak is annoying; especially the girls. Somehow, they always seem to get decent jobs despite having no work experience or marketable traits. Lot of them end up in managerial positions and never seem to work any meaningful job. Weird. These traits define this generation of American women. I have gone into more detail about their behavior in other articles, but it cannot be overstated that they engage in levels of depravity that would make a Mötley Crüe roadie blush. This is resulting in them being viewed very negatively by young men, and as can be seen among many of them in their mid-to-late-twenties, they are ending up miserable, alone, and physically very unhealthy. The evidence is out in the open and not simply a Manosphere topic anymore. TikTok and bad parents have done a number on our youth.

There is no feasible way in any reality or dimension in which Gen Z and the generation after them will be able to sustain American civilization. On top of being a bunch of dullards with no social skills to speak of, these people are woefully incompetent. They are also listless and lackadaisical people with a horrendous work ethic. Considering how intensely America persecutes Caucasian men, the laughable job market, shrinking prospects for a future, the collapse of dating, and no incentives for young men to work hard to sustain anything, I am hard pressed to believe America is going to survive another 30 years; these immigrants are too inbred and mentally stunted to keep this going.

I could go on and on into detail about my thoughts on the Squatemalans and Pajeets flooding into and taking over everything, but I will keep my thoughts on them brief. In fact, I am only going to talk about the Squats. We were bombarded for eons with propaganda purporting that these Hispanics were the hardest workers in North America. “They’re doing the jobs Americans won’t do.” Not sure about y’all but when I pass by a Squat dominated job site, I see far too many of them, for whatever the task is, and half of them are standing around not doing anything. It takes 30 of them to do the job that would normally take 10 local men, and the product is often mediocre at best. Do not even get me started on the retail experience when these people need to buy something. For the sake of brevity, I will cut it off there.

“Oh, but they’re such beautiful people.” M’kay. This is something which has become the common vernacular of the White female hive mind the last few years regarding mulattoes. It is a laughably false statement. Furthermore, they are genetically unhealthy people. This is simply the next phase of the propaganda. It went from sexual liberation, to not telling people what they can and cannot do, to a sexual fetish, and now a full blown eugenics argument in a very short amount of time. This sort of stuff is why I am so critical of White women; they are the arbiters and social enforcers of introducing diversity and White genocide into White communities and organizations. Men are too weak to ever tell them no or call them out on it, especially their fathers.

One thing I have noticed very few people address when discussing America’s downfall and the death of empires is the degradation and bastardization of the language. I was discussing this with a family member the other day who also happens to appreciate history as a hobby. He made note that, based on his readings, language and vocabulary rapidly decline in a period of downfall. Most people lack a developed vocabulary now. I am sure all of you readers have noticed how increasingly difficult it is to speak to some people because they do not understand half of the words you use in regular, normie conversation. Furthermore, I would wager a guess that the average American probably knows somewhere between 100 and 150 words. In fact, I have a drinking game for you. Take a shot every time you hear the words “like,” “f**k,” “literally,” “just,” or “I feel.” How long can you make it during your day before the alcohol poison sets in?

I hate developers and development companies. This is a sentiment I have noticed even normies share recently. Aside from the fact that they make everything ugly and spread McMansion suburbs across the landscape like a malignant, late-stage cancer, they are buying up all of the land in the most discreet of ways. I know an elderly couple who received and offer in the mail from a Texas development company for some rural land they own. How could that company have possibly known about the couple’s land? Furthermore, these sorts of shady offers have skyrocketed in my area recently. It is impossible to make an offer on someone’s assets if they never go up for sale to begin with; the same thing is happening with local Boomer businesses being bought up by Pajeets. These companies are circumventing the competition. Being that this is a national epidemic everywhere, young couples are finding it increasingly difficult to purchase affordable houses. Even better, this constant state of development projects keeps the absurd amount of Squats occupied, well in my area at least. It would not surprise me if some sort of political movement catalyzes in the future to combat these developers in the near future. The unfathomable amount of damage they have done to the futures of the young has not gone unnoticed. All of this is on top of the fact that we live in a financial system which necessitates that we stay in a perpetual, unremitting seller’s market; at no point is the buyer to ever have an advantage.

I know all of this is simply preaching to the choir, but I believe it is important to point out the obvious things. Politics and history are interesting, but everyday experience should not be neglected. Also, I know this stuff comes off as black pilling; however, some positives can be gleaned from this. By far the foremost of the white pills, there is no way America will survive another 30 years.

The post Some More Ramblings and Whatnot appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

There was an article on Lew Rockwell this morning that I agree in part with but not wholly. If I read it correctly, it said that problems with the public schools began with the advent of sex education in schools. I have to admit that sex education in public schools was a major problem. In a normal world such a subject wouldn’t belong in public schools, but the world we live in has not been normal for a long time.

Try to look at it this way. In a normal, free country, you would not have a government education system that compelled attendance. That’s what the public schools do for 180 days each year. If you don’t “educate” your kids somewhere for that number of days per year, you have problems. You may, at this point, be able to teach them at home or in a private school, but it has not always been so. Over the years some kids in some states have been removed from their homes for being homeschooled.

Over the years there were those that went to court to protect the rights of private schoolers and they won some important victories. But always remember this–what the government can giveth, the government can also taketh away. Today’s victory can be tomorrow’s defeat if you don’t constantly keep your eyes open. In a truly free country we would not have to worry about that.

We’ve had public (really government) schools in this country since the 1830s in the North. The Southerners had more sense than to force this on their states until they were forced to in the “reconstruction” after the War of Northern Aggression. In our day, however, the South has embraced public schools in a most alarming fashion. More’s the pity!

It seems as if the South is suddenly in a huge hurry to dispense with its heritage and history, because that’s what the public schools are doing–dispensing with the South’s history and heritage. It may take some awhile to figure this out. but that’s where all this anti-South propaganda is going. Your history will be rewritten by those in the teacher’s unions that seek to make Marxist revolutionaries out of your kids. Some teachers have actually said said as much!

You have only one solution to this situation. That is to take your kids and secede (withdraw) from the public schools–and stay out! The public schools have been headed in this direction since the 1830s and they are not about to change now. They will not be reformed and can only be separated from. For the sake of your kids’ souls, this is what you need to do.

– Al Benson Jr.

The post A premise I agree partially with appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Every four years, Americans undergo the formality of a presidential election. Eight years ago, we witnessed the wild 2016 Sanders/Trump campaigns, BLM/antifa rioting and Trump’s razor thin win. Four years ago, we endured covid lockdowns, Summer of Floyd riots and the most secure election in history. This election season has not disappointed. An incredibly early presidential debate revealed for even the most naïve that Biden is a dementia addled puppet. The media and Democrat operatives engaged in a mass pressure campaign to get Biden to step aside. There was the near assassination of the leading contender for the presidency. Shortly thereafter, the sitting president decided to end his campaign via a Twitter posting of an image of a signed letter. The president remains in office, and the Vice President was elevated to the top of the ticket. A media blitz rolled out to promote this new, exciting candidate. It is unusual, but points to the general mood of the election. Do you comply or not?

Biden’s behavior was already inconsistent in 2019, as many Sanders supporters (much to their dismay the last couple of years) were eager to point out his mental infirmity. As his term progressed, Biden’s lost, feeble antics added up on media with nearly every appearance. This was relegated to right wing media, which means it is not real and not acceptable to discuss. The debate laid bare the truth. As ever the case in modern America, it was suddenly okay for media to notice this, and now America could discuss it. The media defines what is allowed for proper discussion. After weeks of pressure, Biden ended his campaign but continued duties as president. This is a nonsense position as if he cannot run for president, how can he be president? The line is that it is for six months, not four years and six months. Sure, sure, but he could just continue in his duties and if he died in 2025, Kamala Harris in her designated duty would take the reins as Truman did in 1945 not even six months after the election of 1944. These rationalizations are ad hoc and made up in short order but blasted nonstop as the beliefs of good, smart people. Do you comply?

Just prior to the Biden resignation Twitter posting, we saw a gunman take several shots at Donald trump live on CNN. He grazed Trump’s ear due to sheer luck of Trump turning his head ever so slightly at the exact right second. It was a miracle on live television. Trump’s amazing reaction was inspiring. As more information trickles out, we are told a lone gunman managed to get in an elevated spot with a clear view of his target within 150 yards of the target, who had Secret Service protection. Said protection for the first time this campaign season included countersnipers. Now the protection team did not use a drone for overhead coverage, did not use local radio comms to coordinate with local police, and no one stopped and questioned the young man that multiple citizens alerted police to as climbing on the roof. Team members were located within the building but not on the building. The sniper brought a gun and had a rangefinder as he walked around for hours before the event. He was spotted and photographed, but no one stopped him to just ask questions. The countersniper team was instructed not to take a shot before shots were fired. Trump was allowed to go onstage despite the protection detail knowing there was a person of interest missing in the area for ten minutes. This would-be assassin was also the only twenty year old in America who had zero social media, except for (allegedly) a Gab account. The crime scene was washed same day, the first responders were not held for full statements, and the FBI released the body which was cremated. Just a lone gunman who had a plan. Mistakes were made in protecting Trump, and in processing the scene, but whattayagonnado? That’s the story good, smart people believe. Do you comply?

Vice President Harris quickly consolidated the support for the nominee despite other Democrat power players wanting an open mini-primary in the lead up to the convention. A suggestion was a reality show type multi-week televised process. Whomever forced Biden to end his campaign also got him to endorse Harris. The media hit with a wall to wall Harris is cool, hip and BRAT. No one likes her. Rep. AOC even did an Instagram reel saying prior to Biden resigning that he was the nominee and no one liked Harris. That is all forgotten. As is hiding her whenever Biden’s team assigned her to something and she bombed. As is her failure in 2019 despite having a moment as the Democrat frontrunner. Harris has solutions to our problems… that somehow cannot be tried now while she is nominally in position to guide Biden to do something. We will see change! This is what cool, good and smart people believe. Do you comply?

This is the entire election theme. Do you comply with the trajectory that America is on? The Democrats have their base, client groups and many patronage networks in place, but to the rest of the nation do you comply with the trendlines? Fifteen million illegal immigrants in less than four years entered America. You are being replaced. Inflation was due to come with the covid aid package, but this was accelerated by the Inflation Reduction Act. You are being impoverished. America’s foreign policy expert class is fighting one proxy war with a nonzero threat to escalate to a world or nuclear war, and doing a weird dance with another war that threatens to escalate to a regional war. You or your children may be drafted to fight an unnecessary war. The solutions proposed to all of these problems are just to throw more money at them and continue the current course of action. The government-media ecosystem has turned, with both the Biden term and a potential Harris term, the presidency into a ceremonial role as the unaccountable, unelected operators in bureaucracies run the nation and make decisions. Some are fine with that. Some accept that the untouchable class of bureaucrats run the show regardless of what people want. Not all will comply. In November, we will see just how many do.

-By Dixiecrat

The post Do You Comply? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Had another reader question come in the other day. This particular one came in from a younger dissident.

I always enjoy when these types of questions come in, because they force me to break out of my generational molding a bit. Which is always a good thing for us to practice, so we do not become tunnel-visioned about “our times” like many boomers.

The reader asked whether “younger dissidents (younger than 25) should focus on pursuing, as has often been recommended for older dissidents, long-term wealth strategies such as a career, a house, etc., or if it is more worth it to instead prepare for a more immediate collapse that would make these typical measures pointless.”

My initial gut instinct was to focus on the now and just to refer him to my Ways To Contribute series. But as I thought on this one, it quickly became more nuanced. As all good questions do. And I knew it needed to be a fully fleshed article. To help (hopefully) not just him, but others as well.

So, let us begin.

IntroductionThere are certain things that have obvious answers with this question, like retirement planning. I just do not see a situation where a 20-year-old today is going to be able to retire at 60—in 40 years—pain-free like boomers today. Even if the worst case situations don’t happen, there’s no way the US dollar is going to look the same then as it does now. And it is even significantly weakening now. It does not have 40 years to wait.

So should a younger dissident focus on getting the best retirement they can find? Absolutely not.

But other topics are a bit more tricky. And they require a bit of a nuanced take.

I do not generally make a habit out of using clichés. But in this case, it is true:

• A younger dissident should prepare for the worst, but hope for the best.

This would mean, in general, preparing for the more immediate problem, rather than focusing on the pipe dream hope everything remains the same.

Given the economic situation, the demographic situation, the political and moral situation, and so on coupled with modern technology, I think the world looks more uncertain than it ever has.

In such times, traditional long-term goals—such as pursuing higher education, climbing the corporate ladder, and saving for retirement—are less relevant compared to immediate, practical needs.

Instead, focusing on the foundational aspects of life and developing skills suited to a declining civilization should be the primary focus.

Given the above, then for the big-ticket “long-term” life decisions, I’d start with the following:

• Career: Do not spend so much time and effort climbing a corporate ladder. Don’t center your life around employment or a job. Go learn a job or trade that suits you, but would still be useful if a collapse doesn’t immediately happen. Focus on other things more heavily than money right now.
• College: Universally college is probably a waste of time unless you need it for a specific job (so get in and get out).
• Retirement: Retirement will probably be worthless. I wouldn’t focus too much on it.
• House: A house is a toss-up. If you can get land in a safe area with community ties that won’t put you in ridiculous levels of debt, it can be a net positive. But buying a house in the suburbs of a major city on .2 acres? Wouldn’t be my first priority.
• Location: Moving states to a more resilient/like-minded area can be useful, but it depends heavily on circumstances and family/network where you are. Don’t give up the current good in pursuit of just (maybe) slightly better in 5-10 years. Further develop what you have if you are in a good spot, but consider escaping if there is little good near you now.
• Marriage/Kids: See below.

Just my thoughts. Take them or leave them.

I think with the newer generations that the entire concept of a “traditional life” is changing. The previous methods and possibilities are no longer the same. The American Dream does not exist anymore, so the youth are re-writing what that dream looks like. It’s hard for us non-20s to conceptualize this, but it is happening.

Which means that those that can think outside of that traditional box will be able to maneuver and have more stability long-term.

Look at the van lifers, the off-grid types, and the tiny home people. Many people are throwing the idea of a “house in the suburbs” idea on their head, but still having a great living arrangement. The opportunities for the youth in this new digital age are seemingly endless (until collapse, of course), so use them while you can.

Don’t figure out how to take advantage within the system; break the system completely. That’s always a good skill for youth to utilize.

Oh, and while you are deciding, be a good steward of the resources you do have. Don’t over-focus too much on getting more resources. Just reorganize how you use what you already have. Likewise, be prepared for if those resources diminish.

But at the same time, we don’t know the timeline for the collapse. I would hate to see a young person dump everything into a gamble that they only have a few years, and then we are generally stable for 10.

That is where the “hope for the best” part of the cliché comes in.

But what does that look like?

It means just don’t throw away everything in the pursuit of trying to survive a collapse.

A lot of the more traditional things that we tell young people to do for the long-term are also equally good for the short term.

I know some young guns struggle to see that, however. Which is where the nuance comes in.

To explain this, I think it would be better to just be more practical and upfront. I am going to give five strategies for the younger distant, that both prepare for the worst, but also include hope for the best. So no matter what occurs, you’re covered.

The Five Strategies1. Continually Seek GodMatthew 6:33 instructs us to “seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.”

This verse is not a formula for achieving material wealth or success, but rather a call to prioritize God’s kingdom and righteousness above all else.

In summary: Above everything else you do should be God. This is true regardless of the cost.

This is one thing that young people rarely do. It is also one thing that old people wish they would have done when they were young.

I am one such person. I was against God for a long time. Regretably, I tried to find my own way for a long time. It did not work out great.

I have learned the lesson of that verse firsthand. The more I sought after stability and material wealth through secular means, the less of it I had and the less happy I was.

Once I found God, I stopped seeking after those things. But now I have more stability and financial wealth than I did before. It truly is amazing how it works, but you don’t see it until you let God do it. You have to put in the faith and let him work.

At the end of the day, there’s no amount of prepping that will save you if God wants you to be called home. And there is no security in anyone/anything else besides God, whether short term or long term. This world is fickle, and it could be swooped out from under you like a rug at any point. The only constant source of security is God.

So the first strategy for the young is to never forget that all of our life work cannot do the least of what God can do in his spare time.

But even further, when you seek after God‘s kingdom, there are practical benefits. God‘s goals for you usually involve things we need right now. I’m talking about family, a community of people with like-minded values, virtuous characteristics, emotional resiliency, mental fortitude, and similar things.

The younger dissident will find that by following God everything else will be added to them. Trust the process.

ACTION STEPS:

• Read the Bible. All of it.
• Find a good church (preaching truth—including hard truth—with a decent sized congregation, children present, opportunities to connect with others, and a loving attitude.)
• Pray. Daily. Make your requests known. Make your fears known.
• Put down the political books for a bit. Instead, read some historical texts by our Christian ancestors.

• Sacrifice and serve for others. God does not approve of the older generation “I got mine” attitude or the middle generation “I will survive but everyone else is screwed” mindset. YOU are called to be a light on this earth. Do it.

• Find a Wife (and Have Kid(s))Unless you are a Paul without sexual temptation (0.001% of the population, maybe), you should desire a wife. Go get one.

They both level up the man and level him out.

This is usually considered a long-term strategy. But it should not be. There is a woman out there that needs you right now and you need her. Stop wasting time and go find her.

Regardless of what happens in this world, you should lead a family. God wants this for you, and our civilization needs it from you. And even for yourself, it’s also a great thing. Triple benefit.

It’s a no brainer.

If possible, have kids. Do not be a genetic failure. There are far too many genetic failures even now when things are not bad.

Even if you cannot provide the same standard of living that the older generations did, if you trust God, you will be able to provide. At the end of the day, that is what matters.

In a practical sense, if you build your relationship wisely, then your wife is your ultimate support in times of trouble… and in times of peace.

Likewise, your kid(s) are a driving force to keep going and improving and surviving. They provide purpose in times of great evil when there is none.

Civilizational, this is arguably the most essential piece. Europeans will not survive if we don’t do this. We are literally fighting for Western Civilization’s life, and that life requires…Well, life.

As those in the remnant, our children are also the ones most often carrying the torch of our tradition to the next generation.

If everything else burns, but one single of our children remain, we are still viable. God can then still bring back our civilization and our people from the dust. That one person could be your kid, so why are you waiting?

ACTION STEPS:

• Become a good man worthy of a good woman.
• Find a good woman.
• Marry

• Have babies (after enjoying your marriage for a bit)

• Build Character (Especially Fortitude)No matter how bad the world gets, God judges you based on the best possible version of yourself. He does not judge you based on the surrounding world or others.

Neglecting virtue only hurts yourself in the long term.

Character is essential no matter what you do in life. It also matters no matter what happens in life.

I’m not talking about some dopey “be nicer” character improvement. I am talking about things that matter given the world to come.

We all need fortitude, resiliency, strength, determination, and a focused mind. But these are not in us since birth.

They are trained traits they can be improved, and they can be made worse. You improve them by using them often.

It is an experience thing. That is one thing that young people often lack: Experience. So spending time specifically seeking it is a good idea.

Practically, this also satisfies James 2 of the Bible. You need good works to be justified in the eyes of man. We all know people who have a good character and we would trust if things go bad. Likewise, we all know a person or two who has shady character, that we would not want anywhere near us if things go bad. You want to become the former.

This will help you with the community aspect if things go bad quickly. But it will also help you if the world maintains for 10 or 20 years, because you will become a reliable, trustworthy character that other people rely on.

ACTION STEPS:

• Volunteer with something that can build your character. For example, I served as a chaplain for a bit and that helped me tremendously. But I know others that have done things like serving in nonprofits, doing community projects for the poor, and soup kitchen/Salvation Army type work. Do what sounds reasonable to you.
• Start eating better. Fast often to challenge your fortitude. Train yourself to resist temptation.
• Work out. Your body is a temple. Get and stay dedicated to a routine.
• Practice rightwing therapy.
• Build your character by getting involved in community (see #5).

• Do the hard work and make the hard choices when option arises.

• Develop Practical SkillsOn top of character skills, it is useful for a younger dissident to build some practical skills that us older folk often overlook.

I know so many younger guys that don’t know how to drive stick shift for instance. I’m not talking trash, it’s just not a super useful skill anymore that is taught. Most vehicles are automatic now and not many old folk teach it to the young. They barely were teaching it during my time, even.

But knowledge of stick shift is still a good skill to have. Essential for certain driving, construction, and similar careers. But also just to be able to drive any car you find no matter the transmission, in the case of an emergency.

That is just one skill. There are plenty of others in this category. Things like knowing emergency preparedness is useful no matter what happens. Sometime in your life, there will be an emergency. Knowing what to do from both a medical and survival standpoint is crucial.

Economic adaptability skills are also good to have. If you lose your job or source of income, do you have other skills that can get you the resources that you need? If not, develop them.

I know a guy that gets laid off often in his normal job in construction, so he has a teaching degree on the side. It gives him a lot of flexibility. When he doesn’t have his regular employment, he can teach, he can tutor, and he can even work in places like daycares and such. This kind of adaptability is great to have. It also is good just to let you explore career options.

Further, self-sufficiency skills are things I would be focusing on if I were younger. Your basics like gardening, hunting, do-it-yourself building, repair and fixing skills, and similar things. Whatever skills you would need to live if you did not have anybody to help. The goal is to not be in that situation, but we must prepare for the worst if you are in that situation.

Also, in this category, I would focus on practical financial strategies rather than speculative investments. If you have spare money (not many young do, so don’t feel bad if you don’t), put it toward practical things. I have an article on this here: Global Supply Chain Collapse: The Solution (Tangible Consumption Assets).

Obviously, stay out of debt wherever feasible. Debt is the banker’s tool to control you.

ACTION STEPS:

• Take courses/workshops.
• Build medical/emergency/knowledge kits.
• Make a list of 10 skills you need that you do not yet have. Start checking them off one-by-one.
• Practice skills that require muscle memory (like emergency response).
• Start a side business/hobby.
• Acquire TCAs over speculative investments. (You can always sell them later if things remain calm for a bit).
• AVOID DEBT.

• Read my Ways To Contribute series. Decide which person you want to be and start working toward it.

• Find CommunityEngaging with your community helps create a network of mutual aid and collaboration, which can be particularly valuable in times of crisis. The prepper dudes alone in the woods are going to get steamrolled by young guns with friends like yourself, no matter how much they like to fantasize otherwise.

Your community at this age should start to become varied. You are not in high school anymore. It is time to start getting a community of all ages.

Go hang out with your friends and find new friends. But get involved with your city or county things that have older folk. Get involved in your church that should have various ages if it is a healthy church. Meet some middle-aged people at local community events. Become as varied as you possibly can. Each person in different life stages can be of tremendous support to you in different ways. Do not silo yourself with only one age group.

I have written on this one extensively elsewhere, so I will just link some examples:

• Ways To Contribute: The Community Chieftain
• On Community: Creating An Enclave
• Ways To Contribute: Local Food Sources

Follow those and you’ll be off to a good start.

ACTION STEPS:

• Volunteer at various places.
• Seek community-facing employment/engagement opportunities if possible.
• Join boards/committees/co-ops (they always want young people)
• Attend local events, especially with other young people
• Build relationships with TRUSTWORTHY people as you find them. Do not waste time elsewhere.

OutroIt is clearly my personal opinion to focus on the short-term right now over the long-term for the young gun. It is sad for me to admit, but I do not see the young having the option for retirement or a stable enough future to seek traditional life goals.

I also do not see money, personal prestige, job titles, or college degrees mattering a hell of a lot in ten years.

However, I could be wrong. So please pray on this and do as you are lead, not as I say.

Nonetheless, I did not make this list in complete isolation. I did it with a dual-mind in focus. These five strategies should help you no matter what happens in the coming days. If the collapse happens, they will be essential benefits to you. If you have more time than I think, they will only still benefit you, but long-term. Then, when that collapse time does eventually come, they will still be beneficial to you.

And as a sidenote: Even if I am wrong, God is right. If you do #1, then no matter what you do for #2-#99, He will make it work out. That is why #1 is #1 and why it is so important.

My final piece of advice to all the younger blood: Learn from us what you can, but make sure you learn from your own generation as well. We do not know you as intimately as you know yourself. Each generation has their own battle scars that other generations cannot comprehend. Every generation thinks that their elders were in error, and the young are stupid. It is just what generations do, because people struggle to see that each generation has their own thing, no cap.

Learn from us, but learn from your own, as well.

And just know that even if we tease one another, we do truly look out for you and are rooting for you to one day even surpass us in both success and victory.

I know I pray for that for all the younger generations. As every elder generation should.

Good luck out there, whatever you decide to do.

The post Strategies for the Younger Dissident appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Historical Development of the PartiesThe Democrats have their roots in the platform Thomas Jefferson ran on, the “Democratic-Republicans.” They started off advocating against the Federalists and the centralization of power. This put them against the national bank, and in favor of agrarianism and self-determination with regards to slavery and its practice. By the time of Andrew Jackson, it had become the Democratic Party. While far less opposed to sweeping action on the part of the executive (particularly under Old Hickory), the Party still defined itself by its commitment to self-determination for states. The Party also found itself advocating for the rights of laborers and opposing industrialization as it developed in the 19th Century.

The Republicans were started sometime around the Civil War and were dedicated to the “Preservation of the Republic,” which was the impetus for their name. Of course, that just meant bringing the South to heel by any means necessary up to, and including, gunpoint and scorched earth. They also supported industrialization, international trade, and contra-labor sentiments. They ultimately descend from the Federalists, although the hodge-podge of parties that came between Federalists and Republicans aren’t worth spilling ink over with the possible exception of the American “Whig” Party. They were primarily defined by their opposition to the retention of power at the level of the states.

Neither of these parties, historically, would have described the United States of America as anything other than a Republic or a Democratic Republic. The Democrats believed in power more concentrated in “the people,” which the Constitution defines as “the States” in the 10th Amendment and the Executive, which is elected by the people through the states. The Republicans wanted more power concentrated in the Congress, particularly after the imposition of the 17th Amendment which robbed states of the ability to select their own senators through the state legislatures.

Today Democrats, both the elite and the laity, ceaselessly refer to the United States as a “Democracy.” They are particularly apt to refer to it as “our Democracy.” Democracy, to them, is an ideal more than a system of government. This is how they can excoriate populism while endorsing democracy. One might have described Democracy as “egalitarianism” as captured by the French Revolution’s “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” but it’s since moved on. Its nearest approximation now could be rendered, “elevate the historically oppressed groups to their rightful places and we will live together in harmony.” The implied threat is, “no justice, no peace.”

The Republican elites also believe in democracy and perpetuate the delusion that this country was founded as, and existed as, a democracy since its inception. “Republic,” as it appears in our national documentation, art, and history is a mere linguistic penchant in which people used to engage. They really meant “Democracy.” Really, it’s synonymous with “Republic,” because there are only three systems of government. We learned from WWII that you either live in a democracy or you live in a communist or fascist dictatorship. Monarchy? See “Fascist Dictatorship.”

However, the Republican base largely believes that we do or should live in a republic and that our government has restrictions and standards that govern it. Public opinion, manufactured or not, creates no justification for the government to forgo its duties or to grant itself excess powers. When the government refuses to enforce its border and uses bureaucratic investigational agencies to harass citizens with views it despises, the government has ceased to be a legitimate republic.

It’s not the old Reaganite idea that boils down to the Left caring about what the government can do for you and the Right being afraid of what the government can do to you. The government has duties and obligations, many of which it ignores or actively circumvents. Less government isn’t always good government. A republic sets up a strict set of duties and limitations dictating what the government must and must not do. Democracies, on the other hand, demand that the government enact whatever the vox populi wishes. In this case, it’s the will of the elite filtered through media organizations telling you that the people want what the elites want.

Although they started out as names with complex histories and nuance, they’ve become their simple matter-of-fact truths. Democrats want democracy. Republicans, the rank-and-file at least, want a republic.

The post The Parties Now Live Up to their Names appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

“Now in these dread latter days of the old violent beloved U.S.A. and of the Christ-forgetting Christ-haunted death-dealing Western world I came to myself in a grove of young pines and the question came to me: has it happened at last?”

Walker Percy, Love in the Ruins

Here’s an important article by C. Jay Engle, “Revolution from the Middle.” It is a very good summary and diagnosis of where we stand in the last days of the old American order and worth making time to read it.

There is a lot Engle gets right and that I want to agree with, but sadly believe are ideas that have expired. I think Engle is accurate in saying that Friend vs. Enemy is the only sane disposition to have (and abandon any sentiment and belief that a constitutional recovery is possible or even desired) and that building parallel cultural, economic, and social alternatives with Friends is essential (the argument to become a government in waiting). The problem is that this strategy requires a very long time to become operational and longer to have the needed impact. Even if everything he advocates were adopted today en masse by dissidents and Friends from the middle, it probably is too late to slow the free fall.

The reason is because mass migration has changed everything.

Toxic OverloadThere are dozens of instances from antiquity to right now where the intentional migration or resettlement of populations significantly changed or destroyed nations, peoples, or other cultures: Assyrian deportations, Roman colonization, the Gothic migrations, Mongol invasions and settlements, the Spanish in the Americas, Stalin’s deportations and resettlements, Israel’s resettlement policies, how the Han Chinese became the dominant ethnic group in China… The list is long and the impact absolute.

While colonization and resettlement can have flash points of conflict, it is the ultimate strategy of conquest because it is primarily a moderated toxic overload to a host country that avoids the fight. It is the ultimate slow boil.

Comparatively there have been few examples where a host nation successfully reversed or mitigated the impact of resettlement or migration that threatened its demographic, cultural, or political stability. Notably: The Reconquista in Spain, The Reconquista of Sicily, the fall of the Crusader states, the expulsion of the Mongols, China’s expulsion of foreigners from Manchuria, and in Africa, the end of French and Portuguese colonial rule in Algeria, Mozambique, and Angola and the forced White exodus in Rhodesia, Kenya, and South Africa.

In every case, these and other expulsions are violent and brutal.

The British leaving India may seem like there is a peaceful solution because their departure was not violent in the sense of an armed struggle. But unlike the other instances, it was largely a negotiated and planned process influenced by a non-violent independence movement, the broader international context was favoring decolonization, and critically, the British were not a large, entrenched settler population. However, the Indian and Pakistan partition that followed was incredibly violent.

Grim OptionsSo, back to the position the Engle’s article represents. In my opinion, there are only a few options for Heritage Americans:

1. Pursue the strategy recommended in the article and accept that, if you’re lucky, you will live in a “regional fortress” requiring continual defense on a continent now dismembered into zones of Friends and Enemies that will still inevitably clash as each side only grows stronger and more antagonistic over time.
2. Accept the change and learn to live as a literal racial and cultural minority hoping for the benevolence of the New Order.
3. Advocate, organize, and relentlessly posture with the real threat of kinetic reaction to remove the internal enemy and forcibly expel the immigrant populations if demands are not met.

Options one and two seem inevitable and could not be a more depressing and darker outcome. To quote Ronnie Van Zant, “Lord take me and mine before that comes.”

Regarding option three, for all the “revolutionary” and “come and take ‘em” language our side uses, we’re too quick to deflate the idea that the threat of violence and force is actually what we mean, or worse, we actually find force unacceptable or impermissible rather than it being the most obvious and historically defensible solution.

There is no difference in the critique of why conservatism failed (strategically, because it believed that taking the high road and making better arguments would win the day and because it was infiltrated early on by neocons) and the emerging position articulated in Engle’s article. Rather than physically resist and actually fight, we retreat and pen more essays that few read, fewer understand, and no one, including most authors, ever implement.

Once again, conservatism and spin-off derivatives live in the theoretical world, while the enemy is relentlessly in the real world. They use action and have zero compunction about using force, including violence. With the accelerated strategy of the ultimate weapon, immigration, paired with their facility of using force, the Right couldn’t be more comically unprepared for the fight.

Any one of the conservative, paleo, and yes, Southern independence strategies over the last 70 years could have been effective. But, the window has closed. The moment has passed. Mass immigration has very likely killed any chance of any of these grand visions mattering at all.

Unless 30 million people are sent home right now and before their babies start coming at exponential rates, we are defeated.

The Tipping Point and Sending them HomeThis dark assessment is based on numbers. Repatriation is possible until the foreign population reaches a critical mass.

As of 2023, the foreign-born population in the United States has reached a conservative estimate of 15% of the total population, marking the highest percentage in history. This figure translates to approximately 49.5 million foreign-born, a significant increase from previous decades. This surge includes both legal and low-ball estimates on illegal immigration.

The reality is that the number is probably off by ten million, meaning that it’s probably one in five people who are foreigners, mostly illegal and mostly from third-world countries.

Historically, expulsion has occurred at varying percentages of the foreign-born population, often between 1% and 30% with the high end being post-WWII when Germans were forced out of places like Czechoslovakia, Poland, and Hungary. In most cases however, where forced and violent expulsions as cited previously occurred and were successful, those expelled made up a low single digit percentage.

If foreign born and mostly illegals make up 20% of the United States population consider the variables that make peaceful repatriation possible: The percentage of foreign born, how well integrated the people are, their economic power, the time frame of the immigration, and, of course, the political will.

The fact that most have come here recently, they are not integrated, and they have little economic power are certainly positives. The public sentiment is also more in favor of deportations than ever before. The terrifying percentage of foreigners and the lack of political will unfortunately outweigh the things in our favor of hoping for a mostly peaceful political solution.

During Operation Wetback (1954 to 1955), a little over one million people were deported back to Mexico. During the entirety of the operation, illegal workers by American growers continued because growers avoided the bureaucratic obstacles of the Bracero program, which was trying to formalize the process for temporary workers. The unchallenged continuation of illegal immigration, along with public outcry was largely responsible for the failure of the program and why it so quickly lost funding. This would likely resemble what a Trump program would look like. Unless he goes for the big double-digit deportations, anything short of that will be undermined and not matter.

This brings us back to previous options mentioned and whether or not we want to save the continent, or regions of it, from the permanent transformation into something that will more closely resemble the third world.

Ready EnoughFew of us are prepared for fighting personally, let alone having the infrastructure and logistics in place that would be necessary for a prolonged North American Reconquista with the complexities of alliances and resources split between Friends and Enemies. But here’s the thing, there never is going to be a scenario when it’s just right or even good. It’s not how this ever works. It’s a full-time job and something a State alone is capable of doing. But we’re ready enough. We have been ready enough for a long time.

It is not complicated what needs to be done or even how to do it. For obvious reasons laying out a strategy here is ill advised but consider that the Enemy is a paper tiger in every way. From the ability to marshal force at scale and its dependency on the tax base, the system is loud and scary, but weak. It can hurt a few dispersed people at a time. They can do nothing with even moderately concentrated resistance. Less still once it is emulated across states.

We have allies in office, local and state. We have 80% of law enforcement. The military is a clown show but not yet a full mercenary force. It’s still months away from April 15th. Learn how to make your case for the urgency needed now to avoid an irreversible demographic disaster and why presenting a unified and aggressively defiant front is the lone option for a future worth having.

The post Now or Never appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

While the Right is busy high-fiving themselves about how ridiculous it looked that the Democrats allowed Planned Parenthood to set up a trailer to provide free abortions and vasectomies at the now-concluded Democratic National Convention, they miss the larger plot. “I can’t believe they were that dumb!” Dumb? Their stunt wasn’t just not-dumb, it was brilliant. It was evil, ghoulish, and proof of the fact that the party is in sorte diaboli*, but it was tactically sound.

On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Dobbs v. Jackson that, in simple terms, the question of the legal status of abortion would return to the states. The entire country erupted. Cheering, gloating, and celebration occurred on the Right as the first quantifiable “step backwards” towards a saner age had occurred. The Left, equally emotional, shrieked, wailed, and swore revenge.

While some say revenge is a dish best served cold, issues have a shelf-life in politics. Leftists swore they’d remember this at the ballot-box in 2024, but predictably, they were grandstanding about Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan and the Mar-a-Lago raid by August. Trump, in his primary and presidency, played the media like a fiddle. The media and the leftist mob could never make a single “outrage” into a “Monica Lewinski” moment for Trump because they couldn’t help themselves and always shifted coverage to the next outrageous thing he did. Their case of ADHD outlived the Trump presidency. Despite running a feeble piece every week or so about “how people in Arkansas are fighting back against the abortion ban” and other provocative pieces, the ember died out and people found new things to get angry about. Most people had forgotten about the ban, as it had virtually zero impact on them, and moved on with their lives.

Historically, abortion drives engagement in vast swaths of the Democratic Party, particularly its female majority (possible supermajority). After Trump won in 2016, they took to the national mall with their ridiculous pink hats to declare that Trump would take away their right to choose. They were shocked, horrified, and incredulous that he did, through his Supreme Court appointments. He wasn’t supposed to be able to do that. In fact, activists broke into the Capitol building with no legal repercussions (as opposed to January 6th self-guided tourists) to protest the confirmation hearings for Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The Democratic Party knew that a two-year-old issue is one of their most powerful and energizing causes, but struggled with how to bring it up effectively and refocus the mob off the current outrage du jour, which was the “weirdness” of Vance. How would they do this? They’d have Planned Parenthood set up an abortion wagon right outside of their convention center and let everything fall into place.

The media covered it in neutral-to-positive tones and gave it some exposure. People started to remember the ruling of 2022. Then the Right stepped in and behaved predictably and amplified the message beyond anything the DNC could have dreamed of. Grandmothers on Facebook, Groypers on X (formerly Twitter), and content-creators on YouTube were all shining the spotlight on the despicable evil that permeated the Democratic Party, that they would have the gall to set up an infanticide camper right outside of their event. It dwarfed any other single outrageous moment of the convention and will continue to as the event fades further into memory.

Despite the incredulity of good and honest people, the abortion bonanza will not have any negative effect on the Harris campaign. It can only help them. The Democratic base is composed of people who — A: gleefully endorse this type of behavior, or B: have a proven history of holding their noses and tolerating it because they think abortions should be safe, legal, and rare or because their union teacher salary or immigration status is more important.

The only people honked off about this are the people on the Right. And the Right is about as energized as it’s been since 2016 due to a dumpster fire inflation economy, tranny grooming, and immigration. Let’s face it, we’ve also developed our own form of “current event” ADHD, and this will be a, “hey, remember when they put a big blue baby-killing bus out front of the DNC,” type of thing. The Kamala gaffe machine is just getting started. She has to win, and therefore campaign, in a combination of 8 or so different states. If she were on the road any more than she will be in the next few months, she’d be a pothole. She’ll do something dumb the first week of September and the DNC Abortion meme will be indexed and a new one will dominate.

But the Supreme Court abortion narrative got a breath of fresh air for the Left and will stick around. The cat ladies finally remembered what had them so cheesed off in the summer of 2022, and they’re probably a little embarrassed that they forgot about it. The Harris campaign will likely weave a reminder into every speech that they need to show up to pay Trump back for the ruling and so that she can stuff the court with Talmudic law scholars and ethnic minorities. They did what seemed impossible in the era of 24-hour ADHD meme-driven news-cycles. They successfully resurrected a two-year-old outrage and gave it new life. I’ll leave the reader to reflect on the irony.

*In the interest of transparency, I’ll note that Planned Parenthood claims they were only providing “abortion medication.” NPR eruditely described the medication as “abortion pills.” Despite the abortion procedure supposedly being simple, quick, and safe, Planned Parenthood felt they couldn’t perform it in the given facilities and without admitting rights and ease-of-access to a local ER. What’s terrifying is that they found the facilities adequate to perform vasectomies.

The post Bringing Abortion Back to the Forefront appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I noticed a steak and burger seasoning on sale, so I tossed it into my grocery cart as I was going to be grilling burgers for the family yesterday evening. It said it had a “salty, garlic, spicy kick,” why not? White people actually do season their food when it’s not being served to black people in jail and public school, after all. Besides how an interest rate works, this might be the secret we’ve best kept from Black America.

Listen, I’m just not much of a spice guy. pic.twitter.com/u9yadJBMh2

— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) August 15, 2024

As I was about to shake it on the burgers, I happened to catch a glimpse of “bioengineered food ingredients” on the back. This got me to read the nutrition facts. So, basically to deliver a combination of garlic, salt and onion powder with some sort of lemon flavoring to your burger, this company had created a concoction of various corn syrup byproducts, soy compounds, and silicone dioxide. Of what proportions, consumers don’t get to know, so I just tossed it into the trash can.

Nothing is what it purports to be in America these days, right down to the seasoning. As the average voter is now essentially a mutant and our political system acts as a filtration device to sift for the worse possible people this shithole has to offer, we’re witnessing an ever-growing disconnect between the politicians and the voters. This leads to farcical attempts by the politicians to make themselves seem normal by the standards of the voters.

As far as I can remember, the spice thing started with Hillary Clinton saying she always kept hot sauce in her purse as some sort of way to humanize herself by being quirky. She was accused of copying this from a Beyonce song, but I can pretty much guarantee she had no idea who this singer was, let alone the lyrics to her song.

In 2016, a host asked Hillary Clinton what’s something she always has in her bag. “Hot sauce,” she said. Critics claimed she said this to pander to black voters because of Beyoncé’s “hot sauce in my bag” lyric.

But she has been talking about hot sauce in her bag for 20+ years. pic.twitter.com/vMFyzOD8Hi

— Ashton Pittman (@ashtonpittman) December 19, 2018

That fell flat even though the media tried to run with it, but new ideas don’t come around politics too often, so now the Harris campaign is trying to run with it as well. I’ll give it to Kamala Harris that she’s not carrying weight like a connoisseur of the American mutant diet. So, it would seem odd that she would have to pull over her massive armed convoy to get a bag of Doritos, especially since she could click her fingers and get someone to do this for her. Maybe this sort of PR will work, since people like me don’t even vote.

Every road trip needs a snack break.

Doritos acquired. I got you, @KamalaHarris. pic.twitter.com/5nXfEARqwF

— Tim Walz (@Tim_Walz) August 18, 2024

We do seem to be reaching a new plateau in terms of absurdity where there’s really no pretense made about appealing to incredibly ignorant and stupid fat mutants whose reading level probably leaves them with difficulty comprehending the nutrition facts on a label.

The Romney vs Obama election was the last time the candidates tried to make it seem like they were running because they wanted to contend with each other over a set of differentiating approaches to the economy and foreign policy. Trump turned everything into it’s going to be the “best ever” and there was no going back. It worked for him, so why try to make up some jargon about false policy differences that nobody understands or cares about?

I’m not sure why the Harris campaign is trying so hard since this election has been fortified for democracy with mail-in ballots. However, it does seem like Trump has received the blessing of panicked Jewish power system that senses it might need him in the White House instead of prison when things really kick off in the Middle East, which could be any minute now. Having half of the electorate riled up because he’s behind bars would distract from our commitment to sacrificing ourselves for Israel and anyone who’d be fine with this is going to be voting for Trump, not Harris. This could explain quite a bit.

CAUGHT: The Kamala Doritos thing at Sheetz was so fake they filmed it twice, once with Doug, once with Tim

Notice on the ‘official’ clip Tim ‘finds’ her a bag but she’s already holding one. She forgot to put it down

Totally scripted pic.twitter.com/KGQX9HPEVA

— Jack Poso (@JackPosobiec) August 19, 2024

Shocking. When Trump was running against Hillary, and expected to take a lopsided loss, there was no secret made of the fact that he’d activated the enthusiasm of horrible racist and antisemitic Americans. This was thought to be so detrimental that Hillary’s campaign made it into a talking point about “deplorables” in what might prove to be the greatest blunder ever in an American presidential election. 2016 was a really fun rollercoaster, whereas now it’s just a cavalcade of cringe.

One of the reasons that the polling didn’t show Trump winning back then was due to the fact that he got enormous amounts of white voters to the polls who don’t vote because they hoped that some of this racist, antisemitic stuff would turn out to be true. People like us don’t answer polls, so there would be no way to gather accurate metrics for what was going to happen on election day. This was something we were pointing out in the alternative media at the time.

Trump received more votes than any incumbent president in history back in 2020, but since none of the racist, antisemitic stuff turned out to be true, he wasn’t able to turn out that element a second time. The mail-in ballots sealed his fate, but the lack of deplorable support was a major blow to his reelection chances. Again, there’s no poll anyone is going to answer where they admit to not voting for Trump again because he wasn’t a racist, so we don’t have any useful metrics.

He definitely doesn’t have our support this time around and he doesn’t even look to be courting it. Both campaigns are going to double down on stupid and double down on Israel. Israel matters less and less to voters, so it seems counterintuitive, but they need to signal they’re dependable to the Jews calling the shots. Either one of them accusing the other of not doing enough for Jews is outrageously absurd, but that’s the tenor of things now.

Whatever happens with this election, there’s not turning back on stupid. Of this prediction, I have supreme confidence.

The post ‘Tis the Seasoning appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

There’s a colored gentleman I keep seeing at an intersection who purports to have discovered what white people would call an “organic” cure for cancer. He also claims that the Russians have killed certain members of his family and also want him dead.

From one crazy person to another, I’d advise him to simply get himself a website like I did, instead of holding up posterboards in the sun, but we just wave at each other. I’ve learned to respect the grind, so he earned his in my view of the world. Yesterday, I caught myself wondering if there was a Russian assassin already lurking in town preparing an operation to silence this hero.

US GOVERNMENT REPORT SAYS FLUORIDE AT TWICE THE RECOMMENDED LIMIT IS LINKED TO LOWER IQ IN KIDS (AP)

NEW YORK (AP) — A U.S. government report expected to stir debate concluded that fluoride in drinking water at twice the recommended limit is linked with lower IQ in children.… pic.twitter.com/mfhxH6OdMH

— FXHedge (@Fxhedgers) August 22, 2024

Drink up, kiddos! Do you like my tin foil hat? Perhaps he actually does have a cure for cancer, all that I really know is that this place called America has an elixir for anyone’s sanity. The trigger that springs open a trap door to the madness below is the noticing of things. Indeed, the irrepressible habit of noticing things and then wondering about their implication or trying to place them in some broader context is unhelpful to navigating life unperturbed by ongoing or impeding disaster. I suffer from this condition, which I would define as reality-induced psychological distress.

Suffers of this condition are often labeled as “conspiracy theorists.” I feel this is a pejorative, much like calling someone who is mentally disabled “retarded” but that’s a digression. In their own heads, victory after victory is scored, while in reality such internal triumphs change nothing. The real purpose is to confirm their own biases while everyone else around them seems to recognize zero and does their best to induce diabetes with every gulp taken.

I wish there could be an island designated exclusively for us, like they used to do with leper colonies. We’d also get free binoculars to watch eagerly for the flames from afar along with platters of snacks on toothpicks and an open bar. You, see? I’m getting myself off track again. Idealism is a comorbidity to my condition.

By idealism, I mean possessing the basic imaginative capability to infer that we don’t have to live this way. You can have something other than what’s right in front of you. Just this notion will trouble you quite far enough. The expectation might be your demise.

Attendant to this malady is that we can observe at any given time how far things have deteriorated because we’re able to reference something that’s not right in front of us. For example, I can watch a homosexual address the Democratic National Convention and ask the state of Georgia how it casts its vote in his lisp to signal a rapper’s surprise performance.

Simultaneously, I can recall that such events used to be conducted with decorum, realize that nothing of any validity or intellectual value will be discussed the entire time, project that the situation will get worse from here for a set of reasons, and wonder if this country would be better off nuked by Vladimir Putin.

In the same moment, I will feel the urge to drink, remember I need to do yard work when I get home, and make a mental note to stop by the ghetto supermarket where I can purchase Steel Reserve since I refrain from hard liquor on the mower. I’m an adult and adults are responsible. I can’t remember who said that, but somebody did.

Meanwhile, a Republican would say to himself that we had Hulk Hogan do the RNC, so the libs were owned, and forget about the brown voodoo religion woman giving the prayer who could start her own cholera epidemic if she forgot to use a toilet.

I grew up watching wrestling, and I was never a Hulk Hogan fan because he just didn’t move the needle with me in any direction. My favorites were always Stone Cold and the Undertaker. The only time I found him interesting was when he joined the NWO. That was a great plot twist, and everyone was talking about it at school the next day.

If you watch this clip and you have some decades of American decline under your belt, look at how normally all of the proles in the audience conducted themselves. Many of the males are appareled in what I once quipped to my old man was his “boomer casual” outfit: jeans, tucked t-shirt, trucker cap (he didn’t find this even remotely amusing). Were some of them on coke? Sure. Drunk? Oh yeah.

Still, they weren’t raised on legalized speed fed to them so they could pay attention at school. Also, most of them were taking their kids to the show, since they were married to their kids’ mom and that’s what dads did with the older kids back then while the mom stayed home with the littler ones. The 80’s and 90’s were like the 1950’s compared to now.

These same proles just two or three generations removed are now basically mutants. If they have a female, she has at least one nostril pierced, and they should thank their lucky stars it isn’t the full hog ring. Moreover, they don’t have the attention span to even sit through a wrestling match probably even with the cocktail of drugs everybody is on. All the while, I wrestle with my thoughts of the imminent total collapse while I go about my business with a pleasant demeanor or at least a dead look on my face.

It wasn’t until I started writing on the internet that I realized just how many of us are out there. Don’t expect any drug commercials on TV about a pill or non-surgical option to fix our condition, though. That’s all I have for today. Writing on the internet doesn’t clean out my gutters.

The post The Ramblings of a Troubled Mind appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

A few days ago, a friend of mine sent me a screenshot of an engagement he had with a miserable Yankee boy. The Yankee was very proud that his social media accounts were populated with despairing remarks about Southerners, our ancestors, our way of life, etc. However, because of the current political dilemma facing the viability of the American Empire, and in a spirit of unity, he would let bygones be bygones. All hands-on deck was his cry in order to shore up support for Donald Trump. In fact, he would graciously join forces with us, poor rednecks that we are, in order to keep that Dot (not feather) Indian chick from becoming president and, in so doing, save his precious Union.

Well, THAT’S MIGHTY WHITE of him!

Unfortunately for him, we don’t need his pity, his acceptance, nor his benevolence. No, sir, the Grand Ole Party needs us, and that’s how it’s been at least since about 1968. That’s why President Nixon (may he rest in peace), fearful of the strength of a George Wallace candidacy, developed what is historically called the Southern Strategy. I won’t go too deep into the weeds on this issue, we have more capable writers here at ID to address that topic. What I will do, if I may, is pontificate on the importance of the Southern states in this year’s presidential election.

The common strategy in recent presidential elections has been to focus on the Rustbelt. Make an appeal to those forgotten voters in hard hit industrial areas north of the Ohio River. After all, those are the truest of true Americans, and they represent us all. I’ve heard this mantra so many times that it makes me want to vomit. The fact that their societies have no political cohesion attests to their lack of identity. People from the Upper Midwest are as flavorless as tofu, just as full of soy, and completely unnecessary to win the election.

Of course, it’s always good to win more electoral votes, but the true path to victory for Trump is to sweep the South. If he can march through Georgia, ride on the back of that negro Republican running for governor in North Carolina, rally the resistance in the Shenandoah, pull the hillbillies out of their hollers long enough to put an X in front of Trump’s name, he’s got a real good chance to win. And, he can do it without Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

Now, the margin will be thinner than a gnat’s hair, but it can be done. However, if Trump loses just one Southern state, his path to victory will be determined in the courts. And the forgotten territory from the Old Confederacy he has to win, even by the smallest of margins, is Arizona. That’s right, Yankee readers, Arizona was once part of the Confederacy. Hopefully, enough of the good Californians have moved there to turn the tide. I know patriots have been hard at work to limit the amount of fraud since the last election. So, look to Arizona as to how well election integrity is developing, it will be the bellwether.

It is quite possible Trump loses, since the retardation level in the Midwest is astronomical. Notoriously, they can’t even decide if they want to be communists, or quasi-socialist. Trump cannot rest his whole political career, possibly his freedom, on people who consistently waffle between the Left and Right. He has to exhaust his efforts in the South.

I will admit, my spirit is torn regarding the outcome of this election, and for many reasons. If Trump loses, we get endless Third World immigration, astronomical taxes and inflation, and more poverty and servitude among our people. But, it may result in the states taking their rightful role as sovereigns and secure a future for their citizens. If he wins, we may get a moratorium on immigration, the economy may improve, but unfortunately our people will think the conflict with the communists is over and normalcy will be restored. Of course, a Trump victory may give us time to build the necessary political infrastructure to act as a government in waiting.

Regardless of the outcome of the election, the South should be our only focus. Allying with Yankees to save their godless Union should never be an avenue we walk. Our ancestors deserve our resistance.

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post The Donald’s Path to Victory appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In an age where we’re more connected than ever, paradoxically, many of us find ourselves feeling more disconnected from ourselves in the process.

One of the root reasons why, I believe, is because of a lack of solitude.

Notifications, news, and nonstop data makes it hard for us to have the time to wind down and find peace in our day-to-day life.

Now, more than ever, it is important to integrate times of solitude into our routines.

We need times where we have literally nothing to do and zero interruptions.

I’m talking no phone, no work, no other people even. Just you, alone with your thoughts.

These kind of times are critical. They help you find out who you truly are and hope you develop truly deep thoughts that are your own.

It is often in these times of solitude where we grow the most.

One of the problems with the constant breaking news cycle is that people read things and pick up opinions through others without meditating on the thoughts themselves. There needs to be a time where you are alone—without this flow of information—where you can consciously and objectively review and think about the big questions facing you.

It is during this time that you are able to develop your true thoughts.

I believe this is one reason why there are so many normies. There are more than there used to be because there are a lot fewer times of solitude than there used to be.

The normies just hear and read what they are supposed to believe. They take no time to think of it themselves. Consume all; produce none.

But many dissidents and conservatives fall into a similar trap. We often get sucked into the alternative news and the constant flow of data, so that we don’t take time to formulate our own thoughts on hot topics of the day. We just regurgitate what we’ve heard from trusted dissident sources.

This is not good. We need to make sure we are taking time to spend with ourselves. To provide a balance to other dissidents, so we too do not become another hivemind.

Part of this process needs to be completely alone. Otherwise, we are at risk of external persuasion.

There are many ways to go about picking a time of solitude for yourself. Some people like to add it in completely new, whereas others like to integrate it with something they already do consistently.

For example, sometimes I like to go on hikes and just spend the time there with no podcast, music, or anything else. Just my thoughts and the journey ahead.

Another way I sometimes go is with a vice of your own choosing. Sometimes I’ll smoke a cigar alone and put the phone away in the process. But I know some other people that like to have a drink instead, but the solitude component remains the same.

My wife does it while gardening. She likes to just get into garden mode and be deep in her thoughts at the same time.

However, you make it work is up to you. There has to be somewhere in your weekly routine where you can fit it in. All I ask is that you try it.

For the Christian, part of this solitude practice can also morph/become longform prayer. For instance, on Thursdays I have an extended period of time to hit the weights. I usually spend at least an hour and a half on Thursday for the gym session of the week. I work out at home, so during this time I have nothing on tech-wise and no interruptions. Instead of wasting time consuming more content, I spend that entire time in prayer. Talking to God, praising the past week, making requests, and yielding to the thoughts that arise. These longform prayers are only once a week but have revolutionized my walk with God. And I wouldn’t have found it without setting aside time for solitude.

Because of how fast pace our modern day is, most of us have lost track of the importance of catching up with ourselves and improving the inner relationship within ourselves and with God. I believe that is a mistake. It is something that we all need to work on. Myself included.

So if you are not, I encourage you to seek a time of solitude. Even if you can only get away for short 10, 20, 30-minute session at a time once every while.

I firmly believe you will be astounded at how strongly these times of solitude benefit you.

The post The Beauty of Solitude appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The Freedom Caucuses are amongst the better things happening in State politics today. Louisiana is blessed to have one, and they have done some good work so far. Much of the legislation they have written and passed has been excellent, but we cannot say the same thing for some of the resolutions they have written. The Louisiana Freedom Caucus’s (LFC) condemnation of London (England) Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley is a case-in-point. It fails rhetorically and strategically.

Sir Mark has threatened to extradite anyone in the United States who shares footage on social media of the immigration riots that have plagued England recently that he deems forbidden. The LFC rightly objected and issued a stern reply to Sir Mark. But the rhetorical form they chose doesn’t fit the situation at all. They used a device suited for a cold, dispassionate legal brief (a repetitious list of ‘Whereas’ statements), not for bidding fiery defiance to a would-be tyrant. Examples:

WHEREAS on the 4th of July, 1776, the 13 British Colonies declared independence from England . . .

WHEREAS in 1787, the colonies adopted a Constitution . . .

WHEREAS given the fact that English laws related to the infringement of free speech have no effect in the United States . . .

This is the sort of thing that makes peoples’ eyes glaze over, rather than rise up in indignation against the oppressor and in solidarity with the oppressed.

A better example of rhetoric against a tyrant comes from a martyr celebrated on 14 August, St. Eusebius of Palestine (martyred near the end of the 3rd century). Here is some of the dialogue between him and the Roman judge:

Maxentius, whom the people stirred up by furious clamours against the servant of Christ, said to him: “Sacrifice to the gods freely, or you shall be made to do it against your will.” The martyr replied: “There is a greater law which says, Thou shalt adore the Lord thy God, and him alone shalt thou serve.”

Maxentius urged: “Choose either to offer sacrifice, or to suffer the most rigorous torments.” Eusebius answered: “It is not consistent with reason for a person to adore stones, than which nothing is viler or more brittle.”

Maxentius: “These Christians are a hardened race of men, to whom it seems desirable rather to die than to live.” Eusebius: “It is impious to despise the light for the sake of darkness.”

Had St. Eusebius answered as the LFC did – Whereas there is a greater law…; Whereas it is not consistent with reason…; Whereas it is impious…; and so forth – such statements would not have been nearly as effective as the brief, direct responses he actually gave. We hope the LFC will keep things like this in mind in their future resolutions.

Rhetoric aside, there is also the problem of strategy. In condemning Comm. Rowley, the LFC took too big of a swing and landed some blows on the English people at large with lines like these:

WHEREAS the rights of Americans have been inviolate since that time, though we readily acknowledge England’s failed attempt to retake the colonies, we respectfully remind the Commissioner how that fracas ended—with an enormous defeat of England’s Army at the Battle of New Orleans. English casualties were high and the Royal Army was sent home without the treasure or property it craved; . . .

If the LFC really wants to make Sir Mark uncomfortable, they need to undermine his position of strength in England. That is done by making common cause with the plainfolk of England, the people he is threatening just like Louisianans and other Southerners and the rest of the States with jail time for sharing videos on social media. However, one does not make allies by mocking the history and valor of those English people, saying in effect ‘We kicked yo’ hineys once, and we’re ready to do it again.’

The LFC ought to say instead that they understand and value the deep cultural ties Louisiana and all the other States share with the English people. From England we have inherited a wonderful Christian patrimony full of some the finest saints one will find in any land, from monastics like St. Guthlac and St. Hilda to missionaries like St. Willibrord to excellent rulers like St. Edwin and St. Ethelbert. The influence of English literature is likewise profound: Beowulf, the many and varied writings of St. Aldhelm and St. Bede, Chaucer, the language of the King James Bible, the poetry of George Herbert, the powerful works of G. K. Chesterton, T. S. Eliot, C. S. Lewis, and J. R. R. Tolkien; much more could be said in this regard. There is also the English conservative political tradition that we draw from, with remarkable figures like John Henry Newman and Samuel Taylor Coleridge to name just two. Not to mention that the States have inherited the basic structure of their political institutions from England (the three branches of government and how they interact, the bicameral legislature, county government, etc.). And since the Great Feast of the Falling Asleep of the Mother of God has recently passed, we may also note that England (at Glastonbury) was one of the first places where the Christians venerated the All-Pure, Ever-Virgin Mary, beginning there with St. Joseph of Arimathea in the 1st century.

This is the very history and culture totalitarians like Comm. Rowley are trying to erase and replace with a debauched pagan alternative. The LFC and other good folks in Louisiana and the rest of the States should make every effort to shore up the Christian English culture here in North America and also in England. Doing so is the surest way to force totalitarians like Sir Mark to retreat and find another line of work (as a Christian ethnos will not abide such people), one where they will no longer pose a threat to society at large. Thus, instead of unnecessary insults, the LFC ought to be reaching out to Nigel Farage’s Reform Party (amongst others) about how they can help turn the tide in a better direction in England, which would benefit both the UK and the US.

The benefits of international contacts amongst conservatives/traditionalists/reactionaries extend beyond this one kerfuffle with Sir Mark, too: exchanging and improving policy ideas, convivial fellowship and encouragement, warnings about approaching dangers that may have been overlooked, etc.

Ah well, c’est la vie. Live and learn, as the wise ones say. It is difficult to find perfection anywhere in the world. May the Lord bless every good endeavor of the LFC. We look forward to its work in the years ahead.

-By Walt Garlington

The post Rebuking Rowley appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One of the reasons that events transpire without the average person understanding what’s going on is that the average person is stupid and ignorant. That’s why movies tend to shape their perception of what’s happening past and present far more than any cold, dispassionate information that’s available to them. Another problem is false narratives constructed for them, especially narratives which make them feel that things are alright in terms of something they care about.

I know officers with military graduate degrees who’d insist to you we’d be speaking German if we’d lost World War 2. Asking them how a country the size of Texas without much of a navy was supposed to conquer North America would register a blank. Explaining that the U.S. Navy had been shooting at the Germans like it was a war since 1939, but this was deliberately not disclosed to the public, and that American support for the Soviet Union and the UK had prolonged a conflict that could’ve been negotiated to an end is crossing into some pretty dark waters.

Part of why U.S. Army uniforms were switched back to the WW2 style is to make a point about how we defeated the Nazis to save the world and that’s what we’re doing again in the battle against white supremacy. However, it’s also to make soldiers like I described above feel good about themselves since they’ve seen every movie and show about WW2, including The Man in the High Castle. They want to believe, and they’re quite gullible, but they’re going to need some support.

This the fate we avoided by incinerating the populations of major German cities. The basic narrative premise they’ve bought into is that Americans are the good guys, we’re the best at what we do, and we have the best stuff. Whatever transpires in the world pertaining to these matters will be interpreted accordingly, including war with the Russians and Chinese. I know one who’s enthusiastic about our prospects and thinks that’s what needs to happen.

I haven’t talked to any of them about their take on the Ukrainian incursion into Kursk but it seems that one of the Ukrainian objectives is to keep the narrative going that Ukraine has a fighting chance in this conflict, and I’m sure that’s what the confirmation bias they’d receive from what’s going on. This is definitely the narrative being pushed in the MSM. From that angle, the Ukrainian operation is already a resounding success and also a deep embarrassment to Putin.

The question remains as to whether or not it was worth it on this basis alone. For starters, the kinetic objective is clearly the Kursk nuclear power plant which the Ukrainians have now declared is not their objective. Blowing up one of these things is a way to be sure the conflict escalates and brings NATO directly in on their behalf, which isn’t likely to happen with Ukraine losing so badly and the United States distracted by protecting Israel. They need to pull off something so deadly and outrageous that the Russians are forced to retaliate against NATO.

They tried this gambit in Zaporizhzhya by shelling the nuclear power plant that was under Russian control, with the Western media shilling for them with headlines about Putin shelling his own nuclear power plant. The trouble is that the Soviets built these things to survive an indirect nuclear blast and the Russians could fire back, so it was a dead end.

If Ukrainians could gain control of the Kursk plant and rig it with explosives from the inside, that could be the radioactive catastrophe they were going for in Zaporizhzhya, which would be covered with some sort of narrative about the Russians blowing up their own plant. This much is pretty obvious along with their willingness to commit such an atrocity, since they already tried it once.

The initial success the Ukrainians achieved seems to have come from the fact that the Russians were caught by surprise, probably since an incursion into Kursk would be a suicide mission for most of the thousands of men involved and they’d have to be from the valuable trained and experienced units trying to hold them off in Donbass rather than untrained conscripts dragged off the streets to man trenches until they get quickly killed. Apparently, many were transferred from the front lines in Donbass with less than a day’s notice. The Ukrainians would have to sacrifice the best equipment as well.

Strategically, these Ukrainian troops were worth more ensconced in their defensive positions in Donbass rather than fighting from inside a vulnerable salient in Kursk. So, their sacrifice was able to catch the Russians unprepared. We’ve seen from the three failed offensives that when the Russians have determined a potential line of Ukrainian attack, thorough defensive lines with various zones in front of them are erected in which the Ukrainians are slaughtered as they attempt to cross minefields under Russian observation.

None of this happened in their Kursk operation. It looks like they overran bewildered Russian border guards and rolled ahead through open country. This, along with the sheer humiliation of it all, indicates that the Russians never saw it coming. The Ukrainians made so much initial progress because appropriate Russian forces weren’t there to stop them. However, the end result of this will probably be that the sacrifice of so many Ukrainian lives was done only for the benefit of temporary Western propaganda now that the Russian military has focused on them.

This sort of headline is what their lives were worth, all very sad. Unlike the Ukrainians, the Russians haven’t been diverting troops from Donbass where their offensive operations continue to make progress. So, the loss of all these troops in Kursk likely hastens the collapse of Ukrainian positions in Donbass and the Ukrainian military in general. In the meantime, useful headlines will be generated in the Western media and my military expert friends will glean nothing. If the Global War on Terror and everything that’s transpired since has proven anything, it’s that they will just keep believing whatever lies fit the narrative.

It really is nuts to think just how bad things could get here in the United States if our military has to attack Iran for retaliating against Israel and oil prices soar through the roof or the Russians have had enough and finally strike back. This is literally what our “allies” in Israel and Ukraine want to happen. They’re doing their best to force us into taking action. It’s that crazy. Things are bad enough around here as it is, but with the American military on call to save the world it could get much worse.

The post When the Good Guys Save the Day appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I am not a huge fan of Cheeto Hitler, the Bad Orange Man, Donald Trump. He is vulgar and an egomaniac and I would guess he would be insufferable to spend time with. Facing an absolute dumpster fire in the opposition, instead of hammering them on the Big Four issues I think he should be talking about (Crime, Immigration, Inflation, The Economy), he is once again sinking to the level of his opponents and arguing about stupid shit like not taxing tips and calling Cumala Harris dumb. Drumpf is just being Drumpf.

Nevertheless, he has been useful in one major respect: drawing the oleaginous “Conservative Inc” grifters out from under their collective rocks and exposing them as the collection of assholes, faggots and whatever other invective you can think of. I don’t think he even meant to but his ill-manners and more importantly his status as a representation of Whites, and especially White men, has brought out the absolute hatred many of the Con Inc. types for the very people that conservatism relies on to win elections.

While neocons have led the way among the Never Trump Orange Man Bad cult, a close second are evangelical elites who have long proclaimed their holding of the moral high ground in public while quietly disdaining the plebes in the pews that pay their salaries. Most of these “elites” are absolute sissies that look as though they wouldn’t never deign to change their own flat tire and lack the upper body strength to do so in the first place. As effete as French aristocrats and as soft as the Stay Puff marshmallow man, they sneer at the unwashed hordes while holding dainty lace handkerchiefs to their sophisticated noses to avoid smelling the untouchables.

There are plenty of examples, from long time leftist in sheep’s clothing Russell Moore, to the modern crop of “public theologians” condemning “Christian nationalism”, but few are as grotesque as the aptly named David French.

New York Times columnist makes ‘conservative’ case to vote Kamala HarrisDavid French finds Trump to be beyond the pale because he offends David’s delicate sensibilities.

New York Times columnist David French revealed he was going to cast his vote for Vice President Harris in November because he wanted to “save conservatism.”

French, identifying himself as pro-life and someone who supported the landmark Dobbs decision, argued that Donald Trump and the “MAGA movement” have pushed the Republican Party away from “Reaganite conservatism.”

French, an “evangelical conservative,” according to his author page, wrote in his column that a Democratic victory was the only way conservatives would have a chance to fix the Republican Party.

“If Harris wins, the West will still stand against Vladimir Putin, and conservative Americans will have a chance to build something decent from the ruins of a party that was once a force for genuine good in American life,” he argued.

What French wants to build is a replica of the GOP that lost so graciously to Bill Clinton and Barack Obama and of course does so by dragging out the decrepit corpse of Ronald Reagan. The number of loathsome shitheads like David French that have declared themselves to be the ideological reincarnation of Reagan is without count but none of them seem to remember what was known as Ronald Reagan’s Eleventh Commandment:

Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican.

You can argue that Trump isn’t a “real Republican” but the fact of the matter is that he is the Republican nominee. It is also a fact that Cumala Harris is not just a dumb whore but also one of the most far Left mainstream candidates for President in modern history. While the “election” is clearly going to be fake and the whole enterprise of politics is fake and gay, it boggles the mind that someone can think that the way to win elections in the future as the non-White demographic tide overtakes the White Republican voting base is to torpedo the current nominee.

French often cries crocodile tears because mean Alt-Right types mocked him for adopting a black girl from Ethiopia which is amusing because French also complains about being called out for buying a little black girl as a virtue signaling fashion accessory when that is precisely what he and his equally awful wife did.

I don’t know for certain if French just doesn’t get it or if he does and plays dumb, but the rise of the Orange Man to take over the Republican party had very little to do with Trump himself. It had a lot to do with boiling over resentment by Whites, not primarily at Democrats but at “conservatives” like David French who thought it their God-given right to scribble meaningless platitudes in columns and get paid handsomely for it while actual working people were being replaced. As it turns out, the rank and file of conservatism no longer has any interest in David French or his bullshit or his bitch wife.

There is something brewing in America that has nothing to do with David French and his vision for a resurgent lovable losers GOP run by sissies and race cucks. While French and other Never Trumpers like Bill Kristol are talking about ways to wrest control of the Republican Party back from the Republican voting base, many of those voters are realizing the futility of voting at all in a system stacked so heavily against fair elections. If nothing else, I appreciate that the Orange Man is helping to wake more White men up to see the farce that is Conservative Inc.

The post Orange Man Good (At Least For One Thing) appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I can think of no greater traitor to his people than the outrageously silent King Charles, who has said nothing while his nation is destroyed at every angle. The British police not only allow, but tacitly contribute to the kidnapping, rape, and murder of young, White British children. The government protects the freedoms of ultra-violent imams to declare statements of anti-White and anti-Christian hatred, while imprisoning White Christian Britons. The collective war against Anglo-Saxons by the British government is nothing short of demonic.

Great Britain, however, enjoys a robust revolutionary history. In fact, the American Revolution was not a unique event in British history. It was the culmination of a British struggle for rights and national identity that began well before 1066.

Britain’s Celtic ancestors fought the Romans and secured an interesting autonomy. British lords forced the Magna Carta in 1215. The War of the Roses was a bloody contest over the future of the Isles. The myriad of revolutions and internal struggles that Britain endured throughout its history are inspiring. The 17th century deeply impacted the sociological and political identity of the American colonies. That foundational Anglo belief in a codified right to the enjoyment of law and rule by consent led to Lexington in 1775.

By nature, Anglo-Saxons are revolutionaries with a deeply wedded cultural belief in God given rights. Yet today, the British government is at war with the British nation. I do not mean the political boundaries or physical population of Britain. I mean the very racial, ethnic, and cultural construct that made Great Britain a unique contributor to world history.

Last week, some pathetic traitor who leads the London police threatened my American right to not only support a British revolution that returns the rights and native ownership of Great Britain to the British nation, but he also protects and defends Islamist rape gangs. He is, by definition, vile, subhuman scum. I dare him to come after those of us who unequivocally support every car overturned… every rock thrown… every building burned… as the British Nationalists reclaim their revolutionary heritage and stamp out the traitors who call themselves’ “government.”

May God bless EVERY British Nationalist who reclaims his God given right to a government that represents him – not some other tribe(s).

The post A History of Revolution: The British appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

As time goes on, it becomes more and more apparent that Samuel T. Francis really was one of the great theorists of power in the 20th century. His writings offer an invaluable understanding on how Heritage America lost power so quickly, and so decisively. His observations regarding the defeat of Heritage America, the ramifications of this loss, and what the Right must do in response are his most important insights. For Francis, the Right must come to terms with one simple and stark fact – it lost, and the Left now controls the levers of power. Although this may appear very simple and common sense today, it was not the case when Francis made those points back in the 1990s.

Considering how not very long ago it was, but back in the early/mid 1990s, the Right had, at least on the surface, good reason for optimism. Imagine being a conservative intellectual in 1995? The great enemy, the Soviet Union, is now gone, along with the entirety of its European empire. China, North Korea, and Cuba all remained, but it was considered only a matter of time before communism fell there, too. Cuba, with its large conservative diaspora waiting to take their nation back, was considered particularly ripe for an anti-communist revolution. It was taken as a truism, at the time, that the Casto regime would not last long after the man himself, and maybe not even that long.

Meanwhile, the home front offered reason for optimism, as well. Republicans had won five of the past seven elections from 1968 to 1992. And, none of these Republican victories had been close. In four of these victories, the Democrats had been restricted to ten or fewer states. In two of them, the Democrat won only a single state. In one, the Democrat came within 4,000 votes away from losing all 50 states. Sure, there had been the 1976 election, and most recently 1992, but even those were not all that bleak. The 1976 election was between a moderate Yankee Republican and a Dixian Democrat, who was able to distance himself from the cultural revolutionaries of the 1960s. It also happened right after the most important political scandal in United States history, and it was still close. Likewise, 1992 could be written off as a fluke. A recession hit at exactly the worst time. Ross Perot split the conservative vote. Bill Clinton’s 43% would have translated into a landslide defeat in almost any other election. Even here, there was reason for optimism. Pat Buchanan’s insurgent run in 1992 proved there was not an insignificant appetite for a figure more rightwing than Reagan. Not even 20 years earlier, a Reagan presidency could be treated as a joke. Now, a popular figure could be well to Reagan’s right. The 1994 midterms created even more hope. It really looked like the country was going to decisively reject the legacy of the 1960s and the radical leftwing movements of the era.

However, Francis knew better. He knew that, despite the surface level victories the Right had supposedly achieved in the past 30 or so years, it was really just smoke and mirrors hiding far darker undercurrents. The Left was now in control of the major levers of society. This was most pronounced in academia, but increasingly corporations were moving leftward, too. The demographic shift unleashed by the Immigration Act of 1965 was now impacting the electorate. The professional managerial class, which Francis, as a disciple of James Burnham, saw as the actual ruling class, was moving evermore to the Left. Meanwhile, the Right was giving up an ever-increasing amount of ground.

While the Right of the 1950s and 1960s was willing to discuss racial issues, even if such issues were not a driving force of the movement, this was not the case in the 1990s; such discussions had been relegated to the margins. For decades, conservatives understood what immigration would mean to the structure of the country. But by the 1990s, even this was being pushed aside. Conservatism, Inc. decided that being in the good graces of the Left and keeping corporate profit margins healthy was more important than the historical core of the nation. Francis’ solution to all of this was for the Right to actually ditch conservatism. The Left was now in power and “conservatism,” as it has been historically understood as a defensive position, was no longer workable. The Right must now take on an insurgency mindset. Francis was right in 1994, and he’s still correct now.

Of all the elements that make up the Dissident Right, I think Dixian Nationalism is best suited to take on this mentality. The very bedrock of Dixian Nationalism is that Dixie is an occupied nation, much as Ireland was under the British or Poland under the Soviets. Because of this, we are the most capable to observe the United States as a political and cultural adversary. In the United Kingdom of 1915, each of the its parts – England, Wales, Scotland, and Ireland – were theoretically equal, but Irish Nationalists knew that was a lie. In reality, England ran the show and Ireland was, if not legally than practically, reduced to colonial status. So is the case of Dixie. Sure, theoretically each state is equal, but the various ruling apparatus of the Yankee Empire has turned that supposed equality into a joke, the most important of which is the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Elections are federally controlled in all or, at least, parts of our states and even districts can be redrawn at the mere whim of a judge.

The United States is no more our nation than Britian was the nation of the Irish. And, because of that, we can instinctively understand the mentality that must be undertaken. It is only by understanding the position we’re in can we actually win.

The post The Dixian Political Insurgency Mindset appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The “Groypers” (mostly a collection of Zoomers who follow Nick Fuentes, but with a few older/other folks tossed in) have declared a second Groyper War against the Trump campaign:

The X post that started it all.A propaganda poster about the “War”There is a solid article that stays relatively neutral on the declaration from Arktos. You can find it here:

Saving Trump: Fuentes Declares War on Campaign Leadership

Yesterday, America First influencer, organiser, and commentator Nicholas J. Fuentes, a rising star in America’s political landscape, made a public declaration of a new ‘Groyper War’ against the current Trump campaign. The announcement quickly trended on social media, sparking widespread discussion and generating headlines across various news outlets.

Watch the video of Fuentes’ declaration here.

Given the swift and intense reaction from some well-meaning commentators, it is clear that not everyone fully understands the significance of what is unfolding. This analysis aims to break down and explain the underlying moral and strategic reasons behind Fuentes’ declaration.

The Trump campaign of 2024, much like his 2020 campaign, is markedly different from its 2016 iteration — unfortunately, this change has been entirely to its detriment. The campaign lacks the energy and rebellious spirit that originally propelled Trump to victory. Instead of rallying the core demographic that secured his 2016 win, the campaign is now more mainstream, pandering to every conceivable group in society except for those who are actually voting for Trump. This shift towards placating fringe special interests rather than focusing on the core issues that resonated with his base has weakened the campaign’s effectiveness and alienated many of his original supporters.

Fuentes’ strategy of openly challenging the Trump campaign’s leadership and communication strategies is a calculated move with significant potential benefits. By taking this aggressive stance, Fuentes positions himself to claim credit in several potential outcomes. If the campaign stays on its current track and ultimately loses, Fuentes can argue that his criticism was justified and that he predicted the failure. Alternatively, if the Trump campaign makes adjustments in response to his criticism, he can claim that his influence was instrumental in steering the campaign in the right direction. Even if Trump were to win despite sticking to his current strategy, Fuentes could still assert that he and his supporters did everything they could to ensure victory, bolstering their credibility.

[…] (Read More at the link above)

Pretty quickly after the declaration, the total snake JD Vance condemned Fuentes:

Vance says he ‘disavows’ Nick Fuentes: ‘A total loser’

Republican vice presidential candidate, Sen. JD Vance (Ohio), said he “certainly” “disavows” far-right white supremacist Nick Fuentes, who criticized his wife, Usha Vance, for her Indian heritage, while arguing the best response is to “ignore” the attacks.

Fuentes, who dined at Mar-a-Lago with former President Trump in 2022, went after Vance and his family after he joined the former president’s reelection ticket last month.

“Who is this guy, really? Do we really expect that the guy who has an Indian wife and named their kid Vivek is going to support white identity?” Fuentes said of Vance last month.

When asked on CBS News’s “Face the Nation” about the comments, Vance said they “don’t have any room in the MAGA movement.”

“And of course – and of course Donald Trump has criticized this person. Look, I think the guy’s a total loser. Certainly, I disavow him. But if you ask me what I care more about, is it a person attacking me personally, or is it government policy that discriminates based on race? That’s what I really worry about,” Vance continued. “Is bad government policy that harms people based on their immutable characteristics. Look, a lot of losers are going to attack me and attack my family.”

I already wrote a piece on JD Vance here. He is and was a horrible choice for VP. These new developments of him hating on dissidents and spending all his time kneeling before Zionist/non-White interests since securing the nomination only further prove my points against him.

I sympathize with Fuentes here in recognizing that the Trump campaign is headed for disaster and has been completely subverted. Where I disagree is in the implementation of this Groyper War; I.e. in believing that this will make any difference at all. Trump is deep state owned or will be removed. There is no fixing his campaign. He was not pro-White as president before, he won’t be now.

If Arktos is correct, and Fuentes/Groypers are doing this war to hedge themselves for post-election, then it’s a great strategy. However, if they are genuinely attempting to reform a Trump/Vance ticket…Well, then I wish them luck in their near-hopeless endeavor. You can’t reform what was wicked from the start.

I sense that the reality going forward is this:

• Trump/Vance is the ticket for World War 3 and economic decline through Israel.
• Harris/Walz is the ticket for World War 3 and economic decline through Russia/China.

Regardless of your vote, you are getting World War 3 and economic decline. It’s just about selecting your preferred pathway to that same outcome, I suppose. Trump will patriotically march your sons and daughters off to war, whereas Harris/Walz will march them off to war with weird transgender monsters holding a gun to their back. Either way, they are off to the bombs.

And no amount of reform will change that reality. The deep state needs a war. They will get one.

Not an optimistic prediction, I know. But I am just saying it like I see it.

By God’s providence, I hope I am wrong and the Groypers are right.

The post ‘Groyper War 2’: Nick Fuentes Declares War Against The Trump Campaign appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In 1941, as World War II still raged, James Burnham, a former Trotskyite, penned one of the best books on political economy produced during the 20th century – The Managerial Revolution. In the book, Burnham attempts to predict what the future of the basic economic structure of society will be. At the time, there were two major theories: (1) capitalism is a permanent part of human society or (2) capitalism will eventually be replaced by socialism, which Burnham defined as a classless, free, and an international society. However, Burnham rejected both of these dominant theories of his time, opting instead for a third theory: that capitalism will be replaced, not by socialism, but rather by a society run by, and for, “managers.”

At the base of Burnham’s theory is his observation that, with the start of World War I, governments around the world began to make far greater intrusions into the economy. By doing this, a new class was, if not outright created, at least greatly strengthened – managers who ran different state organizations now began making major economic decisions (think of the “alphabet soup” entities of the New Deal). Eventually, the power of this managerial class would expand, and they would wrestle societal control from the capitalists, just as the capitalists took societal headship from the aristocracy. It is important to note that Burnham viewed this as a long process; after all, it took the capitalists centuries, from their beginnings in 14th century Italy, to break the power of the nobility, but break it they did. So, while society may be more or less capitalistic now, the managerial revolution was well on its way. Reviewing the major and rising powers of his time, we have the following – National Socialist Germany, Japan, Soviet Russia (as Burnham notes, the classless promises of the communist revolution soon gave way to a society run by managers), and the New Deal United States all, to varying degrees, were/are managerial societies.

Observing our society of today, over 80 years since Burnham wrote his magnum opus, it is stunning just how accurate he ended up. Burnham noted that these managerial organizations would eventually replace parliaments. During the Obama and Biden administrations, it was often noted just how little they accomplished legislatively. Obama had (and still does) Obamacare, but that was accomplished very early in his first term when his party had a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. His legislative accomplishments become very thin after that, and Biden does not fare much better. Despite this, both men were able to preside over a full-scale cultural revolution via regulatory rules and decrees – for example, transgenderism was able to move from the extremely fringe margins to one of the core tenents of the ruling class. Trump was largely unable to accomplish his counter-revolution because he does not understand the power structure of a managerial society.

The managerial revolution can also be observed in the nominally capitalistic elements of American society. For as much as someone like Bernie Sanders rails against CEOs and capitalism, it is important to note that CEOs are not capitalists in the traditional sense, and certainly not in the way Karl Marx meant. Capitalists are traditionally understood as the owners of the means of production, but CEOs are not the owners of the companies they run (typically, unless it is a small business), but rather they’re employees. They are, in fact, managers. Remember, unlike traditional 19th century capitalism, where the business was run by one or two people, the commanding heights of the economy no longer fit this description. Who owns Delta, Facebook, Google, Disney, etc.? Well, no single person. Each of these companies are publicly traded and do not fit what was once understood as capitalist ownership structures. A board of directors made up of the people who own the most stock make the ultimate decisions for the company, but this is a long way from the capitalism of the 19th century. Though the transition from capitalism to managerialism is still ongoing, it is remarkable just how much was accomplished in a single century.

All of this is important because one of the greatest truths in history is “he who rules, makes the rules.” Hence, the rapid social changes of the past century – society is being bended to better suit the managerial class. To understand this, one can look at the most recent social revolution brought on by the managerial elite: widespread transgenderism. Transgenderism requires a massive managerial structure to provide both the consistent treatment they need to feed their delusions and also prohibit others from noticing reality. Because transgenders aid in the managers’ quest for power, they are propped up.

At the time Burnham was writing, he noted that the New Deal United States was the least developed of all the managerial societies. Although he was correct, it is important to understand that, in today’s world, the United States is the most revolutionary. Something important to note about the bureaucracy of both Germany and Japan is that it is/was made up of the old noble classes. As both nations industrialized and sent their peasants to the factories, Germany and Japan had to find some way to keep their aristocracies afloat, which they did by creating government positions for them in a bureaucracy. This meant that their managerial class had some elements of traditional society. But the managerial class of the United States does not share this distinction. Rather, it is drawn from the elements of society that fanatically hate traditional society and, with that, their drive to destroy it is different when compared to the foreign managerial classes.

Southern Nationalists must fight fire with fire. Although we do not control the federal government and have no hope to do so, we can use our remaining leverage in our Southern states to promote our values. State regulatory agencies should be captured and used to promote rightwing, and especially Southern, values. We can already see the great usefulness where this is already being done, in Florida, for example. Other Southern states must follow through. This really is a life-or-death struggle for our people. The managerial revolution is already here. However, what is not set in stone is how the managerial class behaves. It can be, and has been, used for rightwing aims.

Dixie must utilize the managerial state to survive (for the time being), until a more efficient system can be implemented. Leveraging the managerial system, we can eventually create the necessary conditions to finally achieve independence for the South.

The post The Managerial States of America appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

On the Far Right, there’s a segment that pursues “Christian Identity,” or “CI.” They’ve, in the tradition of the “Heliand,” reinterpreted Scripture to say that they are descendants of the lost tribes of Israel. Denmark was of “Dan” in their parlance. The British Royal family LARPs as Israelites, so I suppose they’re in good company.

One of the reasons CI gains traction is because it’s partially rooted in truth. You can’t deny that Europeans took to Christianity and Christianity took to Europeans. Our ancestors fulfilled the Gospel Mission of carrying the Word to all corners of the World. If God played favorites, I think we know who His favorite son would be.

“I will also give Thee for a light to the Gentiles,” spoke God to Isaiah. We’re more apt to view ourselves as the light than the Gentiles. There’s a fundamental lack of humility and Grace there, but it’s not without some meritorious points.

Christendom and Europe are synonymous. In the old days of the United States and Europe, a non-European was described as “not a Christian man.” We called men from the Middle East “Saracens” or “Mohammedans.” For all of the missteps and bad things that were done in Europe and its colonies, the quiet, fervent faith of the common man has preserved it, despite whatever errors occurred.

The Book of Common Prayer, in the 1611 formation, has prayers for the monarch. But those prayers are sparse against the prayers for the well-being of the common man. Christ came to save all men, but His time on Earth was spent mostly with the common man. The fruit of the common man’s labor are the Christian societies in which we’ve lived up until the past 50 years.

These societies were made in humility and faith of the race that God chose and ordained to carry His banner. One of my favorite essayists described Europeans as the “Christ-bearing Race.” I don’t think a more apt descriptor has been found. He’s since departed the mortal coil to the embrace of our salvation and faith and is doubtlessly walking with Him as we muster on here.

We should embrace our Christian Identity. Christianity and Europe are synonymous and should be. We’re not a lost tribe of Israel. We were the adopted son that pleased his master greatly through loyalty, fervor, and virtue. We are the apple of His eye, and we should always strive to be worthy of His admiration.

The post Our Christian Identity appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I was reading Kaisar’s recent piece this morning and found myself wondering when all of this is going to give way. By “all of this,” I mean everything from the demographic collapse of the civilized world to the misadventures abroad and the financial chicanery our lives are premised upon. I think there’s a collective sense among Heritage Americans that something really bad is going to happen. Our problems are existential, and none can be reformed or even discussed honestly given the fact that Jews control our system of power.

If a system is unsustainable and can’t be reformed, well then something really bad is going to eventually happen. You don’t have to be a doomsayer to recognize the grim logic. I’m a doomsayer, obviously. I went crazy years ago and so I’ve been at it for quite some time now. People expect it out of me and none of the articles I’ve written on the subject ever receive criticism unlike some of the stuff I’ve written on Ukraine, for example. I don’t mind criticism; I’m just saying I sense that many readers agree with me on this one.

I think emotionally, we all want to have some sort of denouement that eventually leads to our problems being solved and we feel like the tension keeps building towards that moment. From a logical perspective, one can surmise we’re moving inexorably towards it, so that doesn’t help anything. Also, things just get crazier and crazier. To use colloquial terminology, shit just keeps popping off and getting more buck wild.

So, emotionally, we desire to just get on with it although this only happens on a subconscious level since, on a conscious level, we want to be able to go to a store in order to procure cigarettes and hard liquor. That would be a tough proposition if the economy collapses.

In terms of the stock market, nothing has happened yet outside of acceptable parameters. It’s a mechanism that’s controlled through certain benchmarks, which act as circuit breakers to shut it down if things start dropping precipitously. After that, trades can be cancelled and other measures taken. So, I don’t know what would actually happen in the next crisis, just that we move from crisis to crisis due to the nature of our system.

In terms of a giant conflagration, we’ve been dodging bullets basically. Apparently, the Ukrainian intelligence service had an operation in the works to assassinate both Putin and his new defense secretary Belousov in Saint Petersburg during the parade for Russia’s Navy Day back in July. If one weirdo managed to nearly nail Trump right in the face with a bullet, Ukrainian operatives equipped with the best technology available stood a chance of success against targets out in the wide open reviewing a naval parade.

The Russians clearly seemed to think so, prompting Belousov to call Lloyd Austin personally to warn that this would trigger World War 3 and list the American and European targets that would be hit in the initial retaliation. This is a scenario they must’ve been gaming out for years.

From the Ukrainian perspective, they’re already in World War 3 and don’t have much to lose from such a gambit. American officials on the other hand, realize that assassinating Putin would be extremely counterproductive despite the rhetoric about this being his “war of choice.” So, they probably weren’t informed about the plot, which the Russians probably assumed, and thus Lloyd Austin received the World War 3 phone call.

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Russian Defense Minister Andrei Belousov last spoke on June 25. Friday's call sought to lower the risk of “possible escalation” of hostilities in Europe, Russia's defense ministry said in a statement. https://t.co/iOiXhKDyMg

— Stars and Stripes (@starsandstripes) July 12, 2024

This incident underscores the fact that Jewish aggression has led to the setting up of situations where things can escalate at the initiative of someone other than the Jews in Washington DC. This has created very dangerous possibilities for us here in the US of A that didn’t exist back with they were doing the Global War on Terror. The other problem is that all of their misadventures intersect with what the insane, retarded Jews are doing over in Israel, and we’ll have to defend Israel with our lives no matter what it does. This much has been made clear to the world by our officials.

So, we get a situation where the United States is able to help the Ukrainians launch a suicidal incursion into Russia with the Kursk nuclear power plant plainly as its target and embarrass Putin, who warned that he can also provide third parties with weapons to cause problems for the United States and then say that he isn’t responsible for what these third parties do with the weapons, just like the American Empire has been doing to Russia with Ukraine.

He does have a track record of warning that he will do something and then doing it if his warning is unheeded. This incursion into Kursk is terrific for Western media propaganda but very bad for Putin who will be forced to do something drastic in order to mollify domestic fury and save face after all the humiliating footage of shocked Russian border guards surrendering.

SHOCKING dashcam footage of Ukrainian soldiers randomly shooting at Russian civilian cars in Sudzha, Kursk region.

This is clear evidence of a Ukrainain war crime. Repost everywhere! pic.twitter.com/NeEhFj6m8A

— Aussie Cossack (@aussiecossack) August 8, 2024

It’s the equivalent of hitting someone in the face and then laughing at him without considering that you’re hitting a strong man in the face who can hit you back in the face, which would really hurt. The Jewishness of such behavior is something ordinary Americans can’t wrap their heads around in order to understand our foreign policy. A normal person lacks the hubris and aggression of a Jew, and thus can’t comprehend it.

So, sophisticated Russian systems are apparently being delivered to both Iran and Syria to use against Israel which assassinated the leader of Hamas with a bomb on a diplomatic compound in Tehran in an act of such astounding provocation only a Jew could do it. These Jews in Israel did this to spark a conflict with Iran in order to drag in the United States and make a statement that there would be no negotiated solution to the current crisis in the Middle East.

The Russians understand that this is where they can land a fatal blow against the Empire without having to strike directly and start World War 3. What happens to the markets when gas prices shoot through the roof and Iran puts its ability to defend itself and retaliate against Uncle Sam on full display? If the Houthis can put a hurtin’ on international shipping, what about Iran? How would manipulation be able to maintain the illusion of stability in the markets? These are all reasonable questions we might, unfortunately, begin finding out the answers to very soon.

The post Throwing Down appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Jobs report is down. Unemployment is up even by official numbers. Labor force participation rate is declining.

The stock market is trending down. Many high profile rich people are making exit moves, even from major stocks, such as Apple.

Other countries around us are declining economically, such as Japan. The entire world is taking financial hit.

But perhaps the most worrying sign is that the elite have even unleashed the infamous R word: recession. They have publicly said that it “might” be coming. Which means they are going to release something worse soon, because we’ve obviously already been in a recession for years at this point.

All of this together, along with the regional conflicts, and I’m not sure the stock market still has long to go before a major correction.

As usual, we are waiting for the spark. We don’t know when that will be, but we know it’s coming.

The warning indicators are getting louder by the day. So, I encourage all of you to make your moves now. Do what you need to do to be in a stable economic situation now. Don’t wait. Get some cash out, buy some tangible goods (TCAs), exit risky stock positions, and so on.

You don’t want to be holding the bag when this all falls. And it’s usually a good indicator to get out when the billionaires are getting out.

Which, worryingly, was just this past week.

The foundational crack is showing. It just might be time to get out of the house before it crashes.

The post Warning Indicators from the Economy appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

As a former liberal, conservative, and libertarian and, for years, a “behind the scenes” political activist, I am happy to say that I have now freed myself from politics and voting. It’s one of the most beneficial choices I’ve ever made!

I used to spend endless hours watching and reading my preferred political sources, mining information I could use to better argue with others I hoped to evangelize to my team, only to realize each election that it had all been for nothing. Things would turn out the same whether I spent 24/7 on politics or did nothing. And no matter what I did, I never had the people in power I desired. I was told voting was my voice, but it seemed no one would listen. I was frustrated, exhausted, anxious, angry, depressed, and more due to my involvement in politics.

Transformation –The OldPerhaps it began while I was a teenager. I remember watching the elections on the news, seeing everyone, win or lose, “come together” and celebrate democracy after each election and being enthralled by the peaceful change of power, as if the only other option was war. What stuck out to me most was the losing side praising democracy and shrugging off the loss of the election. The side that just spent four years bashing the other as evil was now calmly accepting their victory and control over them. They then had the audacity to claim this was self-government simply because people participated in an election that did not produce the government they desired. In fact, even had their side won, it would often only amount to the lesser of two evils.

I never understood how, just because one team achieved more votes, that justified them ruling over the minority party. Was it not political (and military) numerical superiority that led to many forms of evil in the past? Why do we keep handing majorities the reins of government? It seems to ask for more persecution of minorities. In other words, under democracy, there must always be a victim, and we are placed at war with each other, fighting to deny the other their own government of choice. nineteenth-century libertarian and abolitionist Lysander Spooner correctly observed:

[Under Democracy], a man finds himself environed by a government that he cannot resist; a government that forces him to pay money, render service, and forego the exercise of many of his natural rights, under peril of weighty punishments. He sees, too, that other men practice this tyranny over him by the use of the ballot. He sees further that, if he will but use the ballot himself, he has some chance of relieving himself from this tyranny of others, by subjecting them to his own. In short, he finds himself, without his consent, so situated that, if he use the ballot, he may become a master; if he does not use it, he must become a slave. And he has no other alternative than these two.

The NewSpooner’s last two sentences offer a grim choice, but I have dug into some concerning data that has nevertheless pushed me out of politics in recent years. Studies verified at numerous universities over decades corroborate these facts (and much more). Politics is degrading to the mind. When politics are injected into our thought process, we can no longer handle information and evaluate it unbiasedly; this occurs whether you are on the Right or Left. Our most common fallacy is confirmation bias, which hinders us from challenging our own views. We only watch media, read newspapers and books, listen to podcasts, etc., that tell us what we desire to hear. Studies revealed that we receive pleasure responses in the brain similar to caffeine or nicotine while watching our preferred news sources as they demonize the “other” group and justify our own; it becomes an addiction for many.

When we are presented with data that conflicts with our predetermined position, we reinterpret or dismiss it. Media are selling products, and people want only their views confirmed, so we separate into various groups and dehumanize those outside of us, enter tribal good vs evil thinking, and blame life ills on “those people,” the other groups. Politics divides families, churches, and entire nations. The injection of politics has increased wars, crime and the persecution of minorities wherever it has been introduced. It increases anger, stress, and hatred among citizens. Professor Jason Brennan wrote that the majority of regular voters:

…consume political information, although in a biased way. They tend to seek out information that confirms their preexisting political opinions but ignore, evade, and reject out of hand evidence that contradicts or disconfirms their preexisting opinions… cherry-pick data and tend only to learn about research that supports their own views… Their political opinions are part of their identity, and they are proud to be a member of their political team. For them, belonging to the Democrats or Republicans… matters to their self-image in the same way being a Christian or Muslim matters to religious people’s self-image. They tend to despise people who disagree with them, holding that people with alternative worldviews are stupid, evil, selfish, or at best, deeply misguided. Most regular voters, active political participants, activists, registered party members, and politicians [fulfill this description].”

Other studies demonstrate that typical voters are nearly oblivious to what is occurring and what they are voting for; they often vote against the very thing they desire! Trivial events occurring at or near the time of the elections, such as the success of local sports teams, often influence how we vote, not logical reasoning. Instead, most voters identify with a group or a political party due to emotional ties and how they choose to self-identify.

LiberationYou have a greater chance of winning the Powerball three times in a row than of your vote changing the outcome of an election, state, federal, or local. Instead of this fact depressing me, it had a liberating effect. It meant I did not have to spend all my time and energy on something that would not produce any positive outcome.

Removing myself from politics helped free up time and energy, lowered anxiety and stress, helped me be less judgmental and allowed me to think more logically. I no longer have to conform my thoughts and opinions to what a chosen “group” and its outlets tell me to; I can now think for myself. No longer must I be at war with half the country, nor despise them or think them ignorant for disagreeing with me.

So, what do I do with all the time I previously spent yelling at the television and obsessing about politics? I spend it with family, I work out, and I am in much better shape. This has boosted my self-esteem and reduced stress. I am also far less angry and anxious; Doomsday is not coming next election despite what fear-mongering politicians and news channels tell me. I could pick fishing or gardening back up, and I can read for enjoyment! One thing I won’t be doing is voting or attempting to force my way on others; instead, I will follow the golden rule and treat others the way I want them to treat me. I do not want others to use government coercion and power to force me to do what I don’t desire or support what I would otherwise not, and even though they will continue to do that, from now on I choose to turn the other cheek and not repay evil for evil.

-By Jeb Smith

Jeb Smith is the author of four books to date, the most recent being Missing Monarchy: Correcting Misconceptions About The Middle Ages, Medieval Kingship, Democracy, And Liberty. Before that, he wrote and published Middle-earth Lore: Tolkien’s Legends Revealed and another book on J.R.R. Tolkien’s works. Smith has authored multiple articles on various blogs and websites, including History is Now Magazine and Medieval History.

The post Electing Not to Vote appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Many of our readers are of English stock. As for myself, I have deep connections in the British Isles. One of my grandfathers was a man of great importance in Bath, England, and his son was at one time the commander of the British Army in India. My bloodlines are also deeply connected to Wales, Ireland, and Scotland, as is the case for most of us born in Dixie. And though we may tease our brothers across the pond, they are still our kinsmen, and although we have fought each other on occasion, we have also fought side by side to defend that island.

The reign Queen Elizabeth II precipitated the dissolution of the once mighty British Empire, an empire on which the sun never set. And during her reign, her government allowed many of her subjects from various non-European colonies to immigrate into the United Kingdom, completely obliterating the social cohesion of her realm. Now, the native English make up just a little over seventy percent of the current population, Muhammad is regularly the most popular newborn boys name, and Indian food is the go-to for many Brits. A once very Christian nation is plagued with significant and powerful minorities of Hindus and Mohammedans.

Neither of these populations need to be on our island, nor on the Celtic island to the west. They have brought nothing but ill upon the native inhabitants, and though the very polite English have endured much up till now, all with a stiff upper lip, their patience is at an end. Despite those early waves of Third World immigrants assimilating at first, as their numbers grew, so did their disrespect for the culture they were politely received into. Now that they have large populations, especially in some of the bigger cities, such as London and Birmingham, they have transformed places once very English into areas that bears no resemblance to the native culture. Rather, London is routinely called Londistan in recognition of its large Muslim presence.

Throughout England, Muslims, with hundreds of mosques in which to pray, block the streets in vast numbers in the call to prayer, and this is repeated throughout Europe. Loudspeakers blast these prayers throughout neighborhoods. England is being conquered by Islam. And the English have sat around and let it happen, because they have rejected, in practice, Christianity. Power abhors a vacuum, and when there is a lack of a Christian spiritual presence, the demonic fills the void.

For decades, the English have watched as foreigners have displaced them in employment, government benefits, and the preference of their own leaders. Waves and waves of economic refugees, distasteful migrants of every ilk have stormed ashore to plunder the realm’s treasury. And in return for their kindness, the English have seen their daughters groomed and raped, sons murdered, even watched as a little girl was beheaded in front of her parents. Recently, three little girls were stabbed to death, many others wounded, during a dance class. The assailant was a Rwandan man in his early 20’s, however, to add insult to the injury, he was portrayed as a harmless 12-year-old boy in all the dominant media.

And that’s when it happened, that is when the English began to hate!

Our brothers are finally pushing back against the hordes of Orcish folk treacherously imported by leaders on both sides of the political spectrum, and they are demanding an end. Some of the protests have been violent, and completely legitimate as a means of self-defense. As expected, they have been met with resistance by both the Islamists and a corrupt security state. But there is no turning back, for once you have set your hands to the plow, you must continue. Pause or hesitation will just be seen as weakness.

My hope is that a truly Christian king will once again sit upon the throne, casting out those wishing to conquer Fortress Britannia. Until that time, let me help you recall one of the most prescient poems for our
time.

Dwell on its words, and grab hold of the throne of heaven in your prayers, both for your kinsmen and that sacred isle.

The Beginnings
It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late
With long arrears to make good,
When the English began to hate.
They were not easily moved,
They were icy-willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the English began to hate.
Their voices were even and low,
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show,
When the English began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the State.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.
It was not suddenly bred,
It will not swiftly abate,
Through the chill years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the English began to hate.

Rudyard Kipling

De Vindice!

God save the King!

The post The Beginnings, English Awakening appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

As a father to many daughters, I have watched the incremental increase of girl power narratives over the decades. What began as tough females looking to fit in with male partners in the early 90s became female physical supremacy in film by the mid 2010s. No longer are women depicted as feisty characters. They are now the “girl boss” (often with a wimpy male counterpart) who routinely beats up men. For at least two decades, girls have been taught an unrealistic understanding of physical capacity and biology. “Girls can be just as strong as men…” The fact is, they cannot. By God-given design, women are physically weaker than men, and the Olympics are proving this reality on a global stage.

I blame the global “Girl Power”/Gender Equality craze for the reason that biological females are getting pummeled by an Algerian “man-woman” named Imane Khelif in Olympic boxing. Women believed the lie that they could compete with men in physical trials. Correspondingly, when males began entering female athletic competitions dressed as women, naive women supported their inclusion. Whereas normal people knew this was a bad idea, the introduction of biological males has decimated female sports and yet, women activists still support trans-athletes. (Khelif is supposedly not trans, but some kind of hormonal mutant).

At issue, in my opinion, is that we now have a trap of societal design. It is no longer about transgenderism or transgender inclusivity. It is now a direct confrontation between ideological feminism and physiological truth. If women begin to take measures to exclude biological males from sports, they will be admitting that biological males are physically superior to women. Anyone with daughters or half a brain knows this irrefutable fact. But such a step would destroy the girl power mythology that social engineers have constructed for three decades. An exclusion is an admission that they were wrong.

Inevitably, every time I have said females are physically weaker than males, I get one of two responses: (A) a female athlete/body builder is stronger than most men and/or (B) someone knew some girl who beat up some boy. These logical fallacies are predicated on outliers and inconsistent comparisons. Yes, a female body builder may be stronger than most men (which men?) – but she will never be stronger than a male body builder. Meanwhile, it is possible that an average female can beat up an average male, but such an occurrence says more about him than her. Either he refused to hit a girl (good guy) or he happened to be a pathetic weakling. Either way, these outliers do not disprove physiological limitations. Those limitations have been on full display in swimming pools, boxing rings, and running tracks around the world.

All of this gets back to the “Equality Myth.” Women are not – nor ever will be – equal to men. They are simply different. They are not designed by God to be the same. The two immutable sexes are built to complement one another, not compete. A major factor in the feminist equality narrative is part of a broader Cultural Marxist war on the family and God. “Women don’t need men… we are equal… we are just as tough…” The end results of female equality narratives are ever expanding populations of older single women and reduced birth rates.

None of what I am stating is a license to mistreat or abuse women. In fact, it is the opposite. We – men and women – should simply recognize our differences and work together as couples, parents, spouses, grandparents, etc., to support enduring partnerships. That can begin with discarding girl power imagery and entertainment. It is time for women to get back to recognizing reality (and the kitchen).

The post The Olympics & The Girl Power That Wasn’t appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The United Kingdom has been up in flames over the recent Muslim killing of three innocent little British girls. I’ve been calling this the “European Lives Matter” protests. This fits since they are actually protesting what BLM pretended to protest (the killing of their own innocents).

What happened was that a Muslim immigrant killed those three little girls, provoking the townspeople to justifiably lose their collective sh*t.

Slowly, one by one, various other British towns started to protest and riot against the immigration hordes coming in and murdering/raping their children with impunity. The entire country is now holding anti-immigration rallies.

The British are holding up signs declaring European lives matter and calling for remigration. Two great goals.

These ELM protests are totally peaceful, albeit a little fiery.

It seems that the Anglo-Saxon may finally have had enough of being abused in their own country. In favor of foreigners that hate them.

Obviously, these protests and especially the burning down of migration housing are long overdue. The British people had suffered under their corrupt leadership for too long. Their leaders, like our own, place more value on the lives of foreigners than the natives.

Britain is for the British. Every single foreigner should be deported. Even the ones that claim to be British through the touching of the magic dirt, but are still ethnically not British. Strip them of citizenship and send them all off on a boat.

They all have to go.

It seems the English are finally starting to realize this crucial fact:

• Peace is only possible through separation.

This is simply a Christian truth. Peace is only possible through separation until Christ comes. Only then can the wolf and the lamb mingle (Isaiah 11). Until then, we need some fencing to keep them separate. Only a bad shepherd would let those two mix, which is exactly what our leadership has done to us the world-over in every Western European nation.

It goes without saying that I am fully in support of the British fighting the good fight over there. I only wish we had similar here in the States. I am a tad jealous, honestly.

But, this is still great news for every nationalist and every dissident everywhere. One nation making gains and fighting back is a benefit to us all. May God grant them success.

Also, to all of you who constantly consume the black pill, quit the cope. Look at these protests: There is still fighting spirit in us Europeans, even after decades of them trying to stomp it out.

Us Euros have a very long fuse. But once it runs out, it is always a much greater detonation than any other people can create. That much history guarantees. I do not think the Brits are quite at the point yet, but this is a marker that they are nearing it.

These protests are a straight whitepill proving that point.

I hope you will join me in praying for their safety and their success. ELM has a long way to go. But, God willing, Britain will be returned to the British.

The post European Lives Matter appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

It has become something of a meme, but it is indeed true that the American ruling class is very old. Sure, Joe Biden (81) has dropped out of the race, even if he remains president, at least for now, but Schumer (73), Donald Trump (78), Mitch McConnell (82), and Nancy Pelosi (84) all remain. Kamala Harris is being treated as if she’s an injection of new blood but, in reality, she’s hardly young. She is currently 59 and will be 60 before the election. To put this into context, just 24 years ago, George W. Bush was 54 when he was first elected, and he was hardly seen as a particularly young president at the time. So, yes, not only is the Empire’s ruling political class old, but it has also been getting older over the past decades.

Memes aside, this is one of the most important developments in the history of the United States. Far from just being a case of Boomers refusing to give up power much to the frustration of Gen Xers and Millennials, it is actually a sign of an empire’s last days. The Soviet Union suffered from the same geriatric rule. The ruling class of the Soviet Union during its decline was comprised of people born under the Tsar or during the very early days of the Soviet Union. Much like Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev was 54 when he rose to power in 1985. And much like Harris, despite not being young by any reasonable measure, Gorbachev’s rise was considered an invigorating force. And the rest of the Soviet ruling class was even worse. In the 70-year history of the USSR, Gorbachev was the only ruler to be born after the Soviet founding.

There is a very good reason the Soviet ruling class was so old during its last days – the only people who truly believed in the Soviet ideology were the people who were alive during its early days, with its false promises to rid the rule of oppression. But during its terminal stage, it ran out of those people; all that were left were subsequent generations that knew those early communist promises were as empty as a Potemkin village. The Soviet system offered nothing but brutality, corruption, and suppression. And when the older generations finally died out, leaving nothing but generations who found the Soviet promises laughable at best, the entire system collapsed.

A similar situation has arisen in the United States. There is a reason why so many of the ruling class came of age before 1970 – that was the last generation that largely believed in the promises of “America.” They lived in an overwhelmingly White country with a thriving middle class. They had every expectation that if the United States went to war, it would win. Traditional heroes such as Christopher Columbus, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, and Robert E. Lee were near universally admired. Christianity was seen as an indispensable societal bedrock.

But those who came of age after 1970 have faced a far different reality. We live in an era of White demographic decline, and with that, increased cultural and physical attacks on Whites. We have known nothing but a decline in middle class fortunes – at first slowly, but then rapidly. We have never known the United States to win a significant war, with the sole exception of the Persian Gulf War, and even then, the American military had very limited aims. Meanwhile, Columbus is now considered a brutal colonizer, Washington and Jefferson are evil slave owners, and Jackson was a slave owner and Indian killer to boot. Lee is now the quintessential traitor in American (Yankee) culture. Nothing else is needed to be known about these men. And far from being a bedrock of civilization, Christianity is viewed as a societal cancer that is openly mocked and ridiculed.

The United States in the 2020s is much like the USSR in the 1980s – it has finally run out of people who actually believe in it, and it has now ceased to function. Despite whatever smoke and mirrors the Empire can throw up, if anything, the current situation of the American Empire is even worse than the late-stage Soviet Union. Although the Soviet ideology may have been well passed its “sell-by date” in the 1980s, at the very least, ethnic Russians still demographically dominated the nation. Hence, when the Soviet experiment fell apart, they could fall back on the old Russia – the one of the Tsar and Orthodoxy. This has all taken years to play out, and the old Russia appears to be slowly reemerging from the ashes of the Soviet Union because, despite the horrors of communist rule, they did not demographically destroy the country. But this is not true for the United States. The United States has suffered one of the greatest demographic shifts in human history, especially during peacetime.

Unlike Russia, the United States has no such luck – the rapid demographic shift brought on by the 1965 Immigration Act and the unholy alliance between anti-White activists and Big Business to replace the old demographic core of the nation has created a point of no return. Thus, in contrast to Russia, there is nothing for the United States to fall back on. The only solution left is to entirely reject the concept of the United States and build an identity around something more permanent and less abstract: a Dixie identity, not an American one. It is only through an explicitly Dixian understanding of our nation can we recover.

The United States has nothing to offer us. Whatever one might say about the old American Union, either before the crushing of Dixian independence in 1865 or Southern home rule in 1965, that Union is gone and is not coming back. It has shifted too much to ever bounce back to sanity and normalcy. With Dixian nationalism, we can survive the coming collapse – because the South is a nation not based on ideology, as in the case of both the Soviet Union and the American “propositional nation,” but one centered on blood and soil, of a particular people living in a particular place. The United States is in its last days, the problems of the post-1970 order have finally caught up with the Empire.

But Dixie, by offering a new vision and one more similar to the ethnic nationalism of Europe, can thrive.

The United States is dead, long live Dixie!

The post The Geriatric American Empire appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

“I have been young, and now I am old…”

Psalms 37:25 KJV

These words ring true, for I was once young with all the vigor and passion of youth, my mind and eyes full of hope for the future ahead. And now I am old with the reflection and, hopefully, the wisdom that comes with age.

When you’re young, your desire is to be in love, a magical energy consuming every cell into exuberance! Most of us fall in and out of “love” many times in our youth. It is a joyful time, although, mostly but momentary infatuations of the flesh. Wonderfully, it is also a most necessary adolescent step towards understanding true and lasting love.

Although I had dated a few young ladies – all of them wonderful with special qualities that any young man would find attractive – none of them was “the one.” That special designation was reserved providentially for the young lady that would become my wife. Although we lived on the same side of town, went to the same places teenagers loitered, and had many common friends, our paths seemed to never cross. In retrospect, surely, I’d passed by her home at least a hundred times or more, but I never noticed her. Life is like that. God is like that, only revealing the exact moment of the future He has planned for His children when everything is in its place.

For nearly nineteen years, I was unaware of her existence, but then everything changed.

There she was, as if the angels had placed her before me in a flash of light. An epiphanal beauty appearing before my eyes. For the very first time, my heart awakened in rapturous love. Most people find love at first sight hard to believe, but when it does appear, it is fantastical! Truly, our meeting was by divine appointment, a providential intrusion into both our lives’ trajectories. And because of this intrusion, my heart, mind, and soul were translated. I was instantly teleported into a future in which this beautiful angelic being was the axis, humanly speaking, of everything going forward. I would like to say the immediate experience for her part was mutual, however, that would be more than a stretch of the facts.

Through all that marriage gifted us: children, grandchildren, health and sickness, poverty and wealth, our love has endured. Sometimes, we’ve been fire-hot in passionate romance, and other times fire-hot in anger at each other. I will admit that most of those later times were brought on by my youthful impetuous nature. Through it all, sometimes to the point of exhaustion, we have been by each other’s side, now for over forty years. And the most important thing we have learned over those four decades is that giving up is not an option. Our family, our little tribe is Plan A, and there is no Plan B.

God’s world is beautiful – all of it – and, from time to time, those beauties may entice us away, but they are just distractions from our true love.

Brothers and Sisters, recall that first time you fell in love with Dixie, that transcendent moment when you realized how special, beautiful, and timeless your home was. Remember back to the first time you understood how deep your roots were in her soil. Recall the fragrance of the air after a summer thunderstorm, playing in leaves or pine straw in the fall, the crisp air and a light snow of early winter, and most, especially, envision every flower blooming from her soil and the playfulness of everything fresh and young each spring.

Our love for our land and our people is a marriage; there are times of bliss and times of sorrow, but this is our home, and it is Plan A. There is no Plan B. We will persevere.

The last part of this psalm gives us great hope in these troublesome times: “…yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread.“

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post Plan A, No Plan B appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

While events in the Middle East teeter on the brink, there’s still that thing going on in Eastern Europe involving hundreds of thousands of combatants along a line of contact that would stretch from the White House all the way down to the middle of Florida.

This would be the easiest way for Americans to conceptualize it, because in terms of our history there really isn’t anything comparable and the U.S. military doesn’t have the capability to fight such a conflict or the complex to keep it supplied at that scale for years on end. My friends with silver oak leaves don’t even know how to properly interpret what they’re looking at and assume we could trounce the Russians in Ukraine overnight like it’s Iraq back in 2003. The ignorance is that atrocious.

Western media and governments have been lying to their populations about what’s been going on this entire time. The narrative keeps changing and most somehow keep believing it. However, there are certain consistencies. One is that it began with Putin launching a “full-scale invasion” or “all-out invasion.” Google either phrase and you’ll turn up with endless articles and videos on Ukraine. One of these phrases is still used in basically any mainstream article on the subject.

From the moment that Putin launched his full-scale invasion, Ukrainian women have stepped up in every conceivable way to defend their country, to defend their communities, to defend their families, including in combat. — @SecBlinken pic.twitter.com/qzG4hKrtAL

— Department of State (@StateDept) July 10, 2024

Pretty much everyone in our sphere of content understands that when they’re all saying the same thing in unison, that’s usually a glaring admission that they’re lying. Another consistent canard is that the entire reason for this war is the Soviet territorial ambitions of Vladimir Putin. That’s why it’s constantly referred to as “one man’s war of choice” or “Putin’s war of choice,” the implication being that there was no imperative for Russia to fight and it could just stop at any time.

"It's a war of choice. Mr. Putin can stop this war right now by agreeing to a diplomatic solution or at least just stopping the bombing and the death and the destruction that he is causing," Pentagon press sec. John Kirby says. https://t.co/wobotUOmg4 pic.twitter.com/IlclDhNRKe

— ABC News Live (@ABCNewsLive) March 11, 2022

He did, both sides signed an agreement in Istanbul that the U.S. government ordered the Ukrainians to then ignore. Prior to that, two agreements were signed in Europe to prevent a conflict, but they were done in bad faith and reneged on by the Ukrainians as well.What’s changed is that everyone was first assured that Russia was losing very badly. I had lunch a couple years ago with an officer in DC who told me the Russians were sending conscripts forward without rifles to get blasted in order to identify Ukrainian positions. The fact that professionals would believe the turkey shoot nonsense was something I found deeply disturbing. Moreover, it was also taken for granted that Russia’s economy was on the verge of collapse due to sanctions.

They’ve had to admit that Russia’s economy is nowhere near collapse. However, the turkey shoot is still ongoing if you believe the media. Initially, it was all about how the Russian Army would disintegrate in the face of Ukrainian offensives, turning out not to be true three times. Finally, the general admission was made that the situation was developing poorly for Ukraine.

Yet, this was coupled with the canard that the Russians were doing suicidal “banzai charges” to turn the tide. This allowed the narrative to be salvaged a bit by implying that while things weren’t going well for Ukraine, they were inflicting massive lopsided casualties on the Russians. In other words, we were still winning in a way instead of being lied to the entire time.

The other consistent narrative is that the Russians haven’t made much territorial progress beyond areas already held by Russian militias prior to the outset of the Special Military Operation back in 2022. This one is highly problematic in the sense that it’s actually true. So, Russia has been fighting for roughly 2.5 years with very little ground taken. This metric makes it quite easy to mislead the public that they’re being held off by the Ukrainians instead accomplishing an ongoing fulfillment of the primary strategic objective at this stage of the SMO. I’ll explain that later, but first some primer:

In Donbass, the Ukrainians are defending what was the Soviet version of the Maginot Line for Moscow which had been expanded by NATO since the coup in Kiev back in 2014. Ukraine is one of the most bunkered locations on Earth and many of the military positions were built to survive a preemptive nuclear strike so the defenders could emerge and fight off a NATO invasion. On top of that, is all of the facilities meant originally for civilian use, like the Azovstal bunker underneath the massive industrial facility in Mariupol where the Ukrainians were able to hold out during a lengthy siege.

It’s also critical to understand that between the Ukrainians and the Russians are the world’s most extensive minefields. It’s suicidal to assault through these fields in the style of battle used in World War Two, especially since any advance must be conducted in full view of the enemy out in the open, where it’s vulnerable to drones and artillery. The Russians don’t bother for these obvious reasons, but the Ukrainians were forced to do it in offensives that achieved nothing. I’ve seen the drone footage on Russian Telegram channels. It’s sickening.

Back to the current primary objective: the Russian strategy has been to allow the flow of units and supplies eastward where they can be more easily destroyed, rather than crippling Ukraine and stranding them all over a vast country. Part of this strategy has been to create certain kill boxes the Ukrainians are compelled to defend at great cost, such as Bakhmut and Adeevka.

In these areas, firepower can be concentrated as corridors are cynically kept open for them to constantly feed men into the grinder. For instance, before Adeevka fell, it was being pounded with 200 metric tons of glide bombs every day by SU-34s dropping from a safe distance. This sort of operation can’t be conducted if the Ukrainians are spread out further to the west. It’s a facilitated slaughter.

Also, key to this strategy is killing the Ukrainians with “a thousand cuts” (more Western media unison terminology) whereby they’re kept guessing with probing attacks and feints all along the line. There’s a grim logic to the Russian strategy if one can divorce himself from the cold horror of it all. The end game is that Ukraine is depleted of manpower and NATO is depleted of supplies and equipment to send. Ukrainian casualties are in the ballpark of 1 million. Much of the equipment sent by NATO isn’t manufactured anymore or is produced in boutique quantities. Likewise with the munitions.

When this is over, Russia can take whatever it wants without further loss of life rather than making unnecessary sacrifices fighting in an all-out war like it’s been claimed they’re doing. For example, it’s essential for them to take Odessa, a Russian city on the Black Sea. By any other strategy, they’d have to cross the Dnieper River and supply a large army across this river in operations to take Odessa, creating exposed choke points and supply lines that would be extremely vulnerable.

Furthermore, sieges such as Fallujah and Mariupol have demonstrated that taking a city in a modern war requires laying waste to the city. Besides Mariupol, the major cities that Russia needs to take are full of Russians and will be returning to Russia. Destroying them is counterproductive and requires the Russians to take heavy casualties. That’s why Russia avoids doing so wherever possible and, when it’s not, PMCs and volunteer units such as the Chechens and local militias are utilized.

In the meantime, this lack of progress on a map is very useful for deceiving the Western public. It’s used to create the current narrative that Ukraine can’t win but Russia has taken massive losses without making much progress so a deal will have to be made to end the conflict where the two sides currently stand. This is nonsense in actuality.

NEW: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reiterated the importance of developing an international consensus for pursuing peace negotiations to end the war in Ukraine. (1/6) pic.twitter.com/PHbdqbrQsV

— Institute for the Study of War (@TheStudyofWar) July 20, 2024

We’re being fed it because this outcome would be the best case for the neocon Jews who forced Putin to pull the trigger back in 2022 under the misguided belief that the sanctions introduced would collapse the Russian economy while it was stuck in a Ukrainian quagmire and lead to the breakup of the federation. Freezing the lines where they are in Donbass would be the best position for when the conflict is revived. If the Ukrainians are west of the Dnieper River, a new conflict would be a non-starter.

The neocon plan was never to defeat Russia in Ukraine. This would’ve been a risibly idiotic proposition. That was just the narrative they came up with after the original plan to collapse it with sanctions failed and nobody wanted to admit that there wasn’t another plan if the first one failed. They’ve just kept lying and probably hoping for the best this entire time.

The Russians have made it clear that they have no intention of freezing the conflict so it can be revived by NATO at a later date. They’re capable of sustaining their operations for as long as they need to collapse Ukraine if the Ukrainians are unwilling to meet their terms. So, this narrative will turn out to be false like each of the others.

The knot is tightening in the Middle East. Sorry for the innocent lives lost. They are but hostages of a disgusting state: the USA.
Meanwhile, it’s clear to everyone that a full-scale war is the only way to a shaky peace in the region.

— Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) July 31, 2024

There was some risk of escalation and speculation about how far NATO might be willing to go to scare the Russians into halting the SMO in order for the neocons to salvage something of their project in the future. This all was out the window when the retarded Jews over in Israel went off the deep end last October. That wasn’t part of the neocon plan, either. Uncle Sam has a different priority now.

At this point, the Ukrainians are suffering what’s estimated to be between 1,000 to 2,000 casualties per day to overwhelming Russian firepower, which includes thousands of glide bomb sorties every month. The toll for July is somewhere around 60,000. A big question is how long they’re willing to sustain such losses if this was known to the general public in Ukraine, along with the fact that they stand no chance of victory. Conscription is often a forcible process, with many being dragged off the streets and citizens setting the vehicles of the conscription officers on fire.

The Ukrainians I know seem to think they can still win eventually, although this is hardly a scientific measurement of public sentiment. At the same time, the Russian public isn’t suffering any more than the American public during the Global War on Terror and they know they’re winning in a fight to defend Russia. I’ve got friends on both sides, so it’s an interesting dichotomy.

The endgame is either going to be a collapse of Ukraine and Russian territorial acquisition under rather chaotic circumstances or a settlement negotiated in Russia’s favor. Putin has said that a prerequisite for negotiations would be a willingness by the Ukrainian military to vacate all territory that’s now part of the Russian Federation. What he’d demand after that is uncertain. Russia is also positioned as the only party that can actually help Ukraine at any significant scale after the war, so that’s more leverage on his side.

What concessions he’d be willing to make are uncertain after such a lengthy struggle. He clearly finds negotiation preferable to expending Russian lives. That’s why agreements were concluded on three separate occasions. But, that was before 2.5 years of slaughter. He’s open about being foolish for trusting the West to abide by its word and Ukraine doesn’t get much of a say in this matter. It could be that it will be forced to fight as long as it can hold itself together. If it was up to the Ukrainians, this would’ve been over by March of 2022 according to the third agreement that they signed with Russia.

There’s also the potential that wrapping this up as soon as possible is preferrable to the Russians in the sense that they openly state that NATO is looking for World War 3, and would like to be getting prepared rather than extending themselves in Ukraine. The Rand Corporation produced a white paper titled Extending Russia back in 2019 that named bogging them down fighting in Ukraine as a great way to accomplish this one.

I don’t expect the American public to understand what ultimately transpired in this conflict. It’s leading to a rapid realignment of the global order, which will have domestic consequences that the average American won’t be able to conceptualize as being connected to what happened in a failed attempt to collapse the Russian Federation. This is a sharp contrast to a potential war on behalf of Israel, which would lead immediately to dead Americans and skyrocketing gas prices.

We’ll have to wait and see. Until then, many thousands will continue to perish for no good reason. When Jews are in control, a nation can only careen from one disaster to the next. That’s the sad reality for both the United States and Ukraine.

The post There’s Still A Massive Slaughter in Ukraine appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The 2024 Olympics were quite the demonic abomination this year.

Between the drag queens, the mockery of the Last Supper, the pagan imagery (especially of Dionysus), and the occult music playing, it is something I do not even want to cover.

You’ve all seen it anyway, so there is no need.

One meme never hurts, though.Instead, we’ll discuss the Iranian (and greater Islamic) response to it.

Get a load of this:

Iran calling out the blasphemy of Jesus Christ at the Paris ~~Degenerate~~ OlympicsAnd a direct tweet from the Iranian rulerYou know the whole Christianity situation is bad when the most ardent state defenders of Jesus Christ are literally Islamic nations.

I couldn’t help but laugh even while writing that last sentence. This clown world is so ridiculous.

Multi-decade military crusades have been launched over lesser offenses than this Olympic opening ceremony.

But instead of fighting it, our modern Christian leaders are so toothless they don’t even want to judge the demon leading the blasphemy. They’ve swallowed too much of the modern 1800s Christian degenerations. We’re surrounded by weak, ineffectual “Christians”. No wonder we are losing.

Jesus said in His Word that the world would honor Him; Even if no one existed to do so, the rocks themselves would cry out (Luke 19:40). Well, as it turns out, there are no Christian leaders nor Christian states crying out… So He decided on having the Muslims do it instead.

Which, frantically, I think is even more hilarious than if the rocks had to do so.

Think about it: Our mortal enemy—Christendom‘s arch-adversary since their very conception in the Middle East—is now the only state actor actively defending Christ on the world stage.

(For instance, the Book of Concord has a reference stating that the Ottoman Empire [encapsulating Muslims as a whole] was the “most atrocious, hereditary, and ancient enemy of the Christian name and religion”)

I wish I could go back and tell Aquinas, Calvin, Martin Luther, and/or some of the Popes that this day would arrive. Could you imagine what they’d say? They probably wouldn’t even believe it.

Growing up, I never thought I would be cheering on Muslims for defending Jesus against so-called “Christian” nations.

What a wild time to be alive.

The post The 2024 Olympics Fallout: Muslims Defend Jesus More Than Christians appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The U.S. military isn’t what it used to be a couple decades ago when it toppled Saddam Hussein’s government. It was defended by a decrepit military with many commanders bribed not to fight in a covert operation leading up to the invasion. It was a spectacular sight to behold on television, but that part was left out to the American public.

So, it wasn’t quite the brilliant military achievement by which America’s future martial prospects should be measured. Iran or Russia would be a much different scenarios that we’d have zero prospect of emerging from triumphant. This doesn’t deter my friends with silver oak leaves from being upbeat about it, which is scary.

We were lied to that Saddam had something vaguely to do with 9/11 and also that he had a cache of WMDs which he’d use on the rest of the world because he was nefarious like a Bond villain or something. The evidence presented was not at all credible. It’s the first time that I can recall that everyone was told to believe some sort of drastic international action ought to be taken based on risible nonsense.

Netanyahu testified to Congress that this would have “enormous positive reverberations.” In fact, he “guaranteed” it. Freeing the people of Iraq was all about our national security, of course. After all these debacles, Netanyahu is still there along with the Jews in the United States who cooked up the plan. These are literally the exact same Jews behind the horror in Ukraine and all the other failures such as Libya and Syria.

These Jews, currently known as neocons in the United States and formerly Trotskyists in Russia, are totally incompetent strategists as evidence by the comprehensive failure of their projects. In the United States, they’re above accountability and accurate criticism so their objectives still constitute the bipartisan foreign policy of the American Empire regardless.

This is why we move from one debacle from the next as they continue to seek global Jewish domination with the United States as their mechanism, whereas before it was supposed to be the Soviet Union and communism. Stalin got rid of them, the surviving rats scuttled to America, and after the Soviet Union collapsed this current iteration of the plan sprang into action.

Over in Israel, Netanyahu has managed to keep riding the tiger through the support of a different group of Jews with more immediate desires. They make no pretense of blending into Western societies, openly espouse amoral and genocidal religious principles that the rest of the world would find shocking, commit massive atrocities that provoke global outrage, have hordes of children, and are essentially retarded. The children part is how they grew into the group calling the shots in Israel. It certainly wasn’t cunning or deception.

This leads to idiotic Israeli policy decisions, such as bringing the specter of general conflict to the Middle East through a genocide and simultaneous direct confrontation with Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran while the resources of the American golem are stretched to the limit and its prestige depleted in a failed neocon project in Ukraine. It can’t even stop the Houthis from attacking shipping but they’re counting on it to deliver for them big time, so much so that they’ve bet the farm on this one.

Both were evil and stupid ideas, but one thing at a time, if either is to have the slightest prospect of success. If Russia had been knocked out in the Ukraine project as intended, the expansion of Israel and elimination of its enemies would’ve been much easier. The retarded Jews don’t think in broader terms like the neocons, though. In their minds, the goyim are there to serve and die for them, so we might as well get on with it.

Although Jews as a collective pursue conflicting goals, this is a clear example of different factions being unable to synchronize a priority. These Jews in Israel would never be able to prevail in Washington because they can’t hide what they are, while the more subtle neocon Jews don’t have the numbers anymore to keep a lock on how decisions are made in Israel. Both vastly overestimate the feasibility of their ambitions and capabilities of the U.S. military to achieve them, but the ones in Israel are much dumber in this regard.

As a quick primer, what’s happening to the Arabs in Gaza isn’t worth World War 3 to anyone. Even if all 2 million of them are killed, it still wouldn’t be worth it to kick off the big one. So, various governments might deplore what’s happening and make other impotent gestures but they’re not going to war over this matter alone except for the Houthis. Apparently, the Taliban wants to send fighters as well.

However, in Islamic countries, the populations are inflamed over what they’re forced to impotently watch on the sidelines. This compels leaders to make heated statements to try and mollify them. Leaders the world over say various things all the time purely for convenience.

Turkish President Erdogan's threat to invade Israel sparks intense reactions and sharp exchanges, drawing global media attentionhttps://t.co/sFLLFwM5u5

— Türkiye Today (@turkiyetodaycom) July 29, 2024

Erdogan is popular in Turkey but he’s presiding over a public anger about Gaza, and he can’t tell the public he’s not going to do anything substantial, especially as this would disrupt various lucrative arrangements Turkey has with Israel, so he employs empty rhetoric instead. He threatened to invade which isn’t going to happen, obviously.

So, now the Jews are threatening Erdogan with getting their golem Uncle Sam to do a Saddam Hussein on him, seemingly unaware that Uncle Sam isn’t in the shape he was back in 2003 and that Turkey is a much larger country than Iraq. Toppling the Turkish government and taking the place over wouldn’t even have been a feasible proposition back then, either.

Turkey also happens to be a pivotal member of NATO since it can invoke the Montreux Convention to prohibit most naval transit into the Black Sea if a war breaks out, which it did as soon as the Russians began the SMO back in 2022. Surely, NATO would love to have warships in there harassing the Russians, but Erdogan won’t let them in.

He’s also purchased the Russian S-400 rather than the Patriot AA system, forcing the United States to boot Turkey from the lucrative F-35 program. Erdogan refuses to participate in the attempt to strangle Russia economically, being poised to collect a lot of revenue from fees for a future Black Sea pipeline among other things.

Turkey isn’t a NATO vassal like Germany, which will take whatever abuse comes its way. Erdogan is the last person the neocon Jews want to be alienated completely from NATO. If they could get him to play ball it would cause significant problems for the Russians, but their fellow Jews in Israel can’t leave this one alone. It’s hilarious just how stupid they can get. They’re even lobbying to have Turkey kicked out of NATO:

In response to Turkish President Erdogan's threat to enter Israel, Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz has called for Türkiye's expulsion from NATO.

Katz instructed Israeli diplomats to contact all NATO countries, urging them to condemn Türkiye and demand its withdrawal from… pic.twitter.com/UiWoQW3F02

— Yeni Şafak English (@yenisafakEN) July 30, 2024

If there’s going to be any salvaging of their global domination plan, some immediate things the neocon Jews need is for the hostilities in the Middle East to be negotiated to a conclusion, so they’d have more leverage in negotiating a settlement to freeze the conflict in Ukraine in their favor. What’s going on in the Middle East is an existential liability for the United States which the Russians could leverage in a variety of ways.

This is why we see all the coverage of potential negotiations over Ukraine in the Western media which ignore the cards held by the Russians. They’ve repeatedly stated they have no interest in freezing the conflict so it can be revived later by NATO but that won’t stop the Jews from trying as it’s the only possible way to stave off defeat.

Meanwhile, their fellow Jews in Israel just murdered the head of Hamas, who is considered the legitimate leader of Gaza in both Moscow and Beijing, on the soil of their critical ally Iran, while continuing to up the bombing of Lebanon. These Jews are rejoicing at finally being able to kill him after previously killing his family, which is a key aspect of their Satanic religion that they openly espouse as they’re doing it.

BREAKING Israel has assassinated the prime minister of Gaza Ismail Haniyeh, after slaughtering his children and his grandchildren. pic.twitter.com/y6ynuWkMXJ

— Syrian Girl (@Partisangirl) July 31, 2024

From an international policy perspective, this is an insane practice for the Jews in Israel to be conducting, and the neocon Jews get this part, but Western media won’t cover it like the Islamic and Chinese media do, so Americans don’t understand how much of the world perceives their actions. Celebrating the murder of children is bad form unless you’re a Jew and probably also living in Israel.

It’s also a great way to get the Russians and Chinese to realize their efforts to negotiate a truce are pointless and throw up their hands on the issue, allowing Iran to retaliate with greater force. Assassinating a key ally and invited guest to their presidential inauguration on their own soil might even be more provocative to the Iranians than the bombing of their embassy annex in Syria. This murder was a really dumb thing to do at essentially the worst time possible.

During Masoud Pezeshkian's inauguration as president today in #Iran, the parliament broke out in chant of "Death to #Israel" and "Death to America." 1/ pic.twitter.com/1uVyRY18nU

— Jason Brodsky (@JasonMBrodsky) July 30, 2024

This is threatening to drag the United States further into the broadening conflict in the Middle East. We’re not going to be able to sit on the sidelines as these retarded Jews bring the temple down on their heads through blind ambition and bloodlust. It appears they’re held back only by their own restraint.

I’m quite skeptical that a call from the White House pleading “please stop with this you’re creating too big of a mess for America” would sway much with these particular Jews. I could be wrong, but I can’t explain how anything that transpired has been in the interests of America, that’s for sure.

“If Israel is attacked, yes, we will we help Israel defend itself. We’ve been clear about that from the very beginning."@SecDef Lloyd Austin discusses whether the U.S. will help to defend Israel from Hezbollah. pic.twitter.com/N7VPlM8h7l

— Jewish Insider (@J_Insider) July 30, 2024

The idea that Israel can eliminate all of its enemies and expand continuously without eventually triggering a conflict that brings it to an end is absurd. Likewise, the notion that through various schemes and manufactured conflicts both Russia and China can be eventually toppled in order to establish an American stranglehold on the planet through which the Jews can rule it. This is all evil and insane. That conflicting factions of Jews are trying to accomplish both at the same time just underscores this fact.

An escalation is looking more and more likely. If it does happen, historians will be looking back in hindsight amazed at just how idiotically these Jews in Israel behaved. Hopefully, our grandchildren will be around to read about it. But, who knows what happens to us after we get dragged in?

Iran will back hezbollah if Israel attacks Lebanon.

Kamal Kharrazi, foreign affairs adviser warned that a full-scale Israeli offensive against Hezbollah could trigger a regional war.

He stated that Iran would support Hezbollah "with all means" if such a conflict occurred: pic.twitter.com/JC5dqUUTHJ

— Current Report (@Currentreport1) July 2, 2024

The post Irreconcilable Agendas appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The first time I ever heard of Joseph Weydemeyer was way back in 1978 – ancient history now. A friend and mentor, Pastor Ennio Cugini, who was a Reformed Baptist pastor in Rhode Island and also a historian, sent me a picture from the Communist newspaper, the Daily World. It was an old photograph of well-known Marxist Joseph Weydemeyer in his Yankee officer’s uniform. The short commentary with the photo listed some of Weydemeyer’s Marxist accomplishments as well as his being an “officer in the Union Army.” That information in the Communist newspaper was my introduction to the fact that there had been communists and socialists that had infiltrated the ranks of Mr. Lincoln’s armies (with his blessings).

What passes for “history” in those humanist seminaries we still call public schools had never prepared me for that blunt fact, and I doubt if the vast majority of youngsters even in this day have the remotest clue that Abraham Lincoln welcomed communists and socialists into his military, or that the Republican Party of that day was full of them also.

My first thought, way back in 1978 was “What was this Communist doing in the Union Army?” Little did I know back then! I had no clue that Weydemeyer was far from being the only Communist there. It was nearly a decade before I was able to come up with any great amount of information about this, and when I did, what I found was the beginning of the book that Walter Kennedy and I co-authored, Red Republicans and Lincoln’s Marxists. This has recently been reprinted by Shotwell Publishing in South Carolina under the title Lincoln, Marx, and the GOP. Check it out.

There had been a couple books written about some of this way back in the mid-1950s, but they were pretty much out of print by the time I came along. So, Walter Kennedy and I had to do lots of digging for information about this. Thankfully, the internet was a big help. We learned all about the “Forty-Eighters” who were the socialist and communist revolutionaries that sought to make shipwreck of Europe in 1848-49. It turned out that when they couldn’t quite do that in Europe, though they gave it the good old college try, they came over here, often to escape prosecution in their native countries. Unfortunately, they often had more success here than in Europe. The research for the book Walter Kennedy and I wrote took over two years.

Since Weydemeyer was the earliest Communist who wore the Yankee blue I’d learned about I thought an article about him might be worthwhile because it would demonstrate how dedicated to the principles of Marxism those people really were (and still are). Our book noted of Weydemeyer that “Some of Weydemeyer’s more notable accomplishments in New York were the publication of Marx’s Communist Manifesto, assisting in organizing the New York Communist Club, and publishing a German language newspaper Die Revolution. Moving to St. Louis, Missouri in 1860, Weydemeyer soon thereafter offered his services to the darling of the Forty Eighters, Maj. General John C. Fremont when war broke out.”

All these activities would have taken lots of time and effort. But, then, Weydemeyer was into Marxism for the long haul. He wasn’t just tinkering around as so many often did He was actively into promoting Marxist change in and for America. But, then most of the Forty Eighters who came over here before the War of Northern Aggression were like Weydemeyer and were willing to do “whatever it took to get the coon.”

The Communist Club that Weydemeyer helped organize had, as one of its main goals, what it called “nationalizing the means of production.” What this amounted to, shorn of all the Marxist sophistry, was the abolition of private property and taking that property and claiming its true ownership in the name of “the people.” Doing this was supposed to automatically create heaven on earth for everyone – if you were naive enough to believe the Marxist doublespeak. Actually, all it really did was to create a lot of extremely well-off Marxist dictators while ordinary people went begging. Stealing private property is forbidden in Holy Scripture.

There is another book out there, if you can still find copies of it called Joseph Weydemeyer: Pioneer of American Socialism written by Karl Obermann and published back in 1947 by International Publishers, which was an outfit controlled by the Communist Party in this country.

So, as you can see, Joseph Weydemeyer was the consummate Marxist of the mid-19th century, both in Europe and in this country. Unfortunately, there were a lot more like him here after the leftist revolts in Europe folded. This country is much the worse for them having been here. So, those naive people who tell you we never had a Communist problem here until the 1930s are about a hundred years off the mark.

Another book you might want to check out is Benjamin Gitlow’s The Whole of their Lives. Gitlow deals with Communist activity in this country around the time of the First World War. Gitlow had been a Communist and broke with them and wrote this book exposing what they were doing in this country in the early 1900s. The title of this book gives you some idea of the life of Weydemeyer in the mid-1800s. The Communists have been here for a long time, and they have done lots of damage. They do indeed dedicate “the whole of their lives” in service to their humanist deity in their efforts to enslave the world – all in the name of “freedom.” Freedom for them and slavery for the rest of us. It’s past time for America to wake up! Even today, we are voting these Marxist types into Congress because we won’t take the trouble to check out where they are really coming from. If we continue on this path, the freedom we lose will be our children’s!

-By Al Benson Jr.

The post The Consummate Marxist appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

America, the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave, was on its way to self-destruction the moment it began. This is not the fault of the Left, of CNN, of PBS, of government education, nor does the issue lie with the Republican Party or Fox News. The problem runs much deeper, lurking beneath the surface, giving rise to all these inevitable entities. A Trojan Horse ready to pounce the moment we sleep, an evil that devours liberty and inevitably ends in totalitarianism. Its name, democracy.

Many Americans believe they live in a free country because they lack a good standard of comparison. They liken their situation to that of other democracies and conclude America is indeed the land of the free. Those who think about it know full well the scope of our government has multitudinously increased since its origins, placing blame on the media, government education, politicians, parties, etc. But these entities and more arise naturally in every democratic society on Earth.

Further, over time, and especially when voting rights are expanded, democratic societies always move towards progressivism and more government control. In my book Missing Monarchy: What Americans Get Wrong About Monarchy, Democracy, Feudalism, And Liberty, I document many of the totalitarian policies and nature of America today. If America was ever really the home of the free, it’s been a long time since that could be stated seriously. But was it, as I claim in my book, inevitable?

At its core, America was founded on a progressive system with the ability to legislate and amend its constitution. Professional legislators, politicians seeking election and campaigns funded by backers all are inherent in the system. We appointed judges to decipher and interpret the law so it will say what they desire and, like Ben Gates in National Treasure, they discover all kinds of hidden gems fostering governmental expansion.

We have placed authority at the national level and allowed no outside check to its sovereignty. We allow a professional legislature to gather and create laws; it is meant to be progressive. It is not in the nature of humanity to let go of power (especially politicians who campaign for it) but rather to gather it for themselves. It did not take long for Americans under the Constitution to have a far more authoritarian government than they suffered under King George.

Nothing is safe in democracy; liberty does not exist. Majorities can alter or abolish your rights, and judges can reinterpret them away to nothing. Democracy places your liberty in the hands of a simple majority (whose opinions and beliefs are swayed by those in power); thus, your possessions and liberty constantly need protection; they are ever under threat. Even if you prevent government expansion, nine times out of ten you will lose the war in the long term. Forces that desire to control others will inevitably find ways to achieve it. People will discover over time more areas of life intruded on by government regulations. Things outside of politics will become “political issues” now regulated or under the control of the collective. Libertarians will always be one step behind in trying to plug the holes; thus, in any democracy, liberty is slowly bled to death.

The competitive nature of campaigns, especially at the federal level, ensures that those who want power to utilize it to their advantage and are willing to work with powerful elites and bureaucracies are most likely to win. Major corporations and interest groups looking for subsidies favor politicians who are willing to utilize tax money for their benefit. Thus, those politicians are well-funded and more likely to win an election. Conversely, the same interest groups will remove politicians or laws unwilling to give them what they want: access to D.C.’s power and money.

Likewise, the politicians who offer more of other people’s stuff (taxpayers’ money) will have the upper hand on election day compared to the candidate who does not offer his voters free stuff. People want everything provided for them and believe that D.C. has magical abilities to produce anything they desire, making them more likely to vote for the progressive candidates.

Governments frighten their citizens half to death over environmental scares, viruses, terrorists, “white supremacists,” what will happen if the other party is elected and much else. Further, the government will seek out imperfections; if none are found, it will create them and offer itself as the problem solver. As the government enters these new areas and creates bureaucracies to control them, more employees come within the federal ranks. These agencies become entangled in the system and the parties, and not only they but future politicians now must accept and subsidize them. Eventually, the majority of the population depends on some form of a handout, job, welfare, subsidy, tax break, and so on, and everyone comes into the state’s grasp. Willing slaves predominate, and the result is that the government can do as it pleases and is ensured of its maintenance.

Politicians are not punished for overspending; the next generation must pay the debt. Therefore, they tend to spend, and spend like it’s free. They do not incur the debt, the nation does. They are wealthy, their kids attend private schools, they will do fine, and they gain power and friends by spending, thus leading to more expansion. Today, we are taxed at a higher rate than serfs in the Middle Ages or slaves picking cotton.

Because power is now with the voters, their minds are manipulated by those in authority to control the outcome. Whenever and wherever democracy is implemented, mandatory state education and a compliant media become the managers of citizens’ worldview and thinking. Regardless of where it occurs (or when), democracy inevitably directs its citizens to become docile, hardworking, and taxpaying subjects; they accept government expansion and even desire it. Each state begins to mold its people to its image, instituting a collectivist and nationalist mindset and inducing hostility to the individual and individual liberty.

The result of long-term democracy is either a one-party dictatorship or perhaps an oligarchy of two or more powerful centralized political parties and their media allies manipulating and controlling the economy, politics, and citizens’ minds, swaying them as needed for each election cycle. Despite what American conservatives tell you, propaganda is not a modern, liberal, or Marxist development; it arose as soon as parliamentary forms of governance began. Conservatives themselves indoctrinate their people; they are just currently behind the progressives in it.

Conservatism is fundamental to democracy, ensuring progressivism long-term. If progressives were unhindered, government expansion and social engineering would occur rapidly, and local push-back, secession, and rebellion would occur. Conservatives ensure the rate of progress is slow enough that all of society is kept under control yet directed progressively forward. Even if conservatives won each election, the resulting government would be many times more authoritarian and oppressive than under King George III because all democratic societies move in that direction, the “Right” playing its part. Liberty is dead; it was killed by the disease called democracy.

-By Jeb Smith

Jeb Smith is the author of Defending Dixie’s Land: What Every American Should Know About The South And The Civil War (written under the name Isaac. C. Bishop) and Missing Monarchy: What Americans Get Wrong About Monarchy, Democracy, Feudalism, And Liberty. You can contact him at jackson18611096@gmail.com.

The post Democracy Inevitably Leads to Totalitarianism appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I listened to an interesting podcast by The Distributist. He details a lot of things and much of it is watching him collect thoughts and collate them into something more useful. I’ll summarize the more useful parts, as I understand them.

I forget where I first heard the distinction, but man falls into one of three categories: warrior, farmer, or priest. Christ, of course, fulfills all three. David, The Distributist, references these three classes in his analysis of the works of Abd al-Rahman Ibn Khaldun. He defines them as Nomads, Kulaks, and Troubadours. For better reference, we’ll call them warriors, farmers, and priests.

The warrior specializes in asset-denial to the enemy. He lives off the spoils of raid and plunder. But it’s easy for him to get burned out. War requires energy. He can’t produce anything on his own. He’s reliant on the productivity of his enemy. This is his secondary vice. His primary vice comes from his lack of purpose without an oppositional force. A knight without a dragon to fight is no knight. More erudite scholars than I have speculated that it was peace that destroyed Camelot. Less erudite scholars than I have observed that it was peace that destroyed Rome. The Pax Romana was a prelude to the collapse, just as the Pax Americana surely sealed the fate of this nation, but that’s another story for another time. One could accurately describe them as parasitic, although parasitic off the enemy.

The farmer is something more familiar to most of us. They live lives of seclusion and stability. They don’t care what happens in Rome. What they care about functions around the turning of seasons and the implications of the weather. These people generate wealth. The wealth produced ends up in the hands of the enemy, which is raided by the warriors, and returned, in a pittance, to the men who created it. The farmer specializes in asset generation. This is the story of the Cossacks and their attempt to protect the poor farmers from cruel nobles and Jewish loaners. They could return only a fraction of that which was made. This is the American middle and working classes. If you’re reading this, you’re almost certainly one of them. You keep your head down and do what you have to, so that the people you care about can continue to live. God loves farmers, for farming is akin to gardening, which is what He designed as our primordial vocation. Work functions as both man’s curse and man’s blessing. The farmer is deeply rooted to his land and his work. He values the traditions of his home, and he has a sense of home. The warrior wanders. The farmer abides.

The final caste is the priest. The priest creates culture, for wherever there is culture, there is a cult. He practices asset-denial to the enemy while also practicing asset-generation. The plowman plows better with a song in his heart that inspires him. The warrior fights harder with the songs of his forebearers to encourage him and the hope that songs of him will be sung. The priestly caste also encompasses bards and other “creatives” (I hate to use the term) which inspire better things in people. The priest longs for the death of the enemy and does all he can to encourage the other two classes. He does this through recalling the culture of the past and creating a new and better culture in the present (this is difficult in our age). His greatest danger is in spending too long gazing into the abyss. As we all know, the abyss stares back. He will experience temptation. Temptation starts with small compromises which, in turn, become larger ones. In some ways, he’s in more direct contact with the enemy than the warrior is. One can only maintain irony (in the literal sense) with an intense will, and the will is finite. In a sense, the priest animates the other two and gives them a purpose beyond vanquishing your enemies and seeing the harvest’s yield.

The best and most healthy thing for us is to be aware of these facets. Just like we are made in the image of God, no man is wholly warrior, farmer, or priest. We need to learn to practice all of these elements in our lives and to pursue them when granted opportunities. We’ll always fall into one category more than another, but we should strive to understand and practice the other aspects. Never miss an opportunity to contest the enemy, cherish the work that you do and the people for whom you do it for, and strive to describe the things that encourage you to do these things.

The post Warrior, Farmer, Priest appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Secularism is not in itself unbiased, nor does the removal of Christianity from the public sphere ensure neutrality. Instead, it simply replaces the God of the Universe with the secular state. Over time, in any country or people that adopts a secular state or constitution its people will follow and eventually the state itself will become like a god to them. It will dictate their morality, welfare, education, purpose, it will become the arbiter of truth and justice, and so on. What was the authority of God, the Church and the family will be handed over to the state. Atheism becomes the state-sponsored religion practiced in the classroom and across society. Without a Christian foundation or a higher law above the state, authoritarianism is sure to result in any secular society.

Totalitarians and atheists desire the state to be their higher power and replacement for God. But this god has no limitations on behavior, economics, and other regulations it seeks to impose. And in the eyes of its followers, the more involved it becomes, the better for society. It will seek to eradicate other gods or things that might pull authority away from itself. The family, traditions, the Church, etc.

Politicians prefer atheists for many reasons. One is that atheists are easily startled and frightened. Threats of global warming, viruses, terrorists, and so on will whip the secular masses into a frenzy, causing them to run to their high power, the state, for safety. Everywhere democracy is instituted, it promotes and teaches relativism, materialism, atheism, and immorality. It seeks to separate people from their family, traditions, religion, local laws, and customs to make it easier for a population to be molded to its image. Without a solid foundation, a secularist can be easily swayed, manipulated, altered, and driven in whatever direction is needed.

Politicians desire secularism because it removes limitations, restraints, and higher law. They can then reshape and reimagine society as they desire. If they want to destroy the family for their convenience and power, they can. They want their media pundit allies and state-sponsored and certified educators to be the high priests and shapers of society’s moral values and thoughts, displacing pastors, priests, and rabbis. Across the world, Muslim countries produce a devout population desiring Sharia law, secular democracies produce secularists in love with democracy. Every government manipulates the worldview of its people to herd them as it desires.

No King but ChristIn a democratic society, those in authority do not prefer Christians with a biblical worldview. For example, throughout the Middle Ages, a nationwide tax would be unthinkable; when it was attempted, revolts began, houses were destroyed, agents murdered, and so on.

Devout Christians, whose highest lord is the king of kings, make for terrible slaves. They are not, as politicians wish, easily maneuverable, adaptable, and swayed. Further, they dare to hold to a higher authority than those in power. They even judge them by this highest authority that declares they have limited specified duties to serve the people and not vice versa. We, being multiple generations into democracy, have been domesticated beasts for so long we have become complacent, caged animals, impotent against the oppressor, not knowing what liberty is—or worse, afraid of it.

During the Middle Ages, law was derived from God and the people’s traditions and could not be manipulated or abused. So, the medieval peasant did not have to campaign, elect the correct politician, or worry about the next one coming in, because those in power had no right to violate the law; it was set in stone like the Ten Commandments. As I explain in my book, Missing Monarchy: What Americans Get Wrong About Monarchy, Democracy, Feudalism, And Liberty, during Christendom (700-1300 A.D), it was ingrained in the politics of the day that any man, lord, or king who overstepped his God-given authority was to be resisted by force or at least ignored by the entire society. To cooperate with a tyrant (a lord who gathered power to himself) would be itself treason against the law, and God.

Justice, law, liberty, etc. were derived from the eternal God and natural law and thus did not change based on who currently holds power. Defending law, liberty, and your rights was not an act of pride but a defense of God, who declared things to be so and was attacked by tyrants who sought to elevate themselves above God’s law and the limitations placed on them. You were not defending your rights in a modern political realm, but God in Heaven, declaring Him lord rather than a current human lord who has gone astray. Further, the eternal judge of nations looked down upon His people, and their obligation was to maintain a Christian realm. To allow tyrants to go above and beyond their limited roles to introduce paganism, atheism, or tyranny was sure to bring the wrath of God on His people, an extra incentive to resist tyrants.

In modern times, we have entirely changed our definitions of traitor and rebel based on blind obedience. Today, anyone who does not follow a federal declaration is a traitor or rebel. In the Middle Ages, any ruler who went outside of law and tradition was a rebel and traitor and was to be resisted by law. Thus, a medieval peasant would say the greatest outlaws in America were not those of the Old West but are its elected officials and judges of today.

What do you do with such people as existed in the Middle Ages? If you’re the government, how do you control them? Well, because the medievals were free men living before the domestication we have suffered, the Middle Ages must now be vilified, demonized, and misrepresented so none would ever think of replicating the period. If we were to imitate them today—all at once—we would overthrow the current power structures. They don’t want people to know of a time when the government and special interests did not micromanage their minds, lives, and fortunes. It was a devout Christian population during that period that maintained a Christian and libertarian society.

– By Jeb Smith

Jeb Smith is the author of Defending Dixie’s Land: What Every American Should Know About The South And The Civil War (written under the name Isaac. C. Bishop) and Missing Monarchy: What Americans Get Wrong About Monarchy, Democracy, Feudalism, And Liberty. You can contact him at jackson18611096@gmail.com.

The post Separation of Christ from State appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

You might have heard about this odd thing called ‘paraphiliac infantilism’.

Maybe you don’t know that highly technical phrase in particular, but you probably know what it actually is. Put bluntly, it’s when adults pretend to be babies.

I.e.: Paraphiliac infantilism is when a grown man or woman dresses up and pretends that they are a baby.

I think in the modern lingo, they just call it adult-baby age play. But I’m not exactly “in the know”, so take that with a grain of salt.

These weirdos will do things like suck on a pacifier, have other adults change their diaper, play dress up as a baby, and do other assorted acts you would typically do with/as an infant.

Sometimes it’s a sexual kink and other times it is just platonic. Some of them genuinely just want to be a baby. Kind of like most furries.

Either way, it’s really bizarre. But nothing too surprising given how degenerate our entire society is. I wish this was the worst thing we could complain about. But it’s not. If you don’t believe me, here are some examples of even worse perversions: [1][2][3][4][5][6]

Your average ABDL (“Adult Baby and Diaper Lovers”) participant. Note: This particular specimen is also a transgender, born female.But the fact that this infantilism is even a thing that occurs, is telling about where we are as a people.

For sure, this adult-baby thing is an extreme degeneracy regarding infantilism. But it is not the only one.

Our entire culture is plagued with the same kind of infantilism. Very few of our people want responsibility or to lead lives like a normal adult would’ve had to do 100 years ago.

Instead, almost all of our population wants zero suffering, no struggles, and no challenges in life. They want to coast with others providing for them. But without struggle and independence, there is no personal development. We need hard times to build us. Without them, we stay where we already were.

Which, ironically, is exactly what we are seeing today. A population of adult infants who never grew up.

Maybe the average adult infantile doesn’t dress up and age play like the extreme cases. But they are infected with the same root disease. It’s just not expressed as intently.

Many of our own people desire to return to a time in their lives when all of their necessities were provided for them, free of any work on their part. Hell, many of our own citizens currently live with that being the case through government and NGO services.

These people not only do not want the freedom to lead their own lives—They abhor it. They want an authority that does everything for them. The other people (like us) that seek to “take it away” from them are akin to how a child views someone trying to take away their mom and dad.

It’s wild, but it is a not an insignificant bulk of our population.

I think most of us dissidents realize that when stuff starts to get real bad in the States, a significant chunk of the population is just gonna die off.

But have you ever thought about why that is?

I wager to bet that a significant reason why is because of this infantilism. Our population has become so affluent and averse to struggle that as soon as anything is actually genuinely hit, they’re just gonna lose it. Just like an infant when they aren’t provided with every single basic living necessity.

The leftists are at extreme risk for this in particular. Because they live off of everyone else as a parasite. So if the host is struggling to provide even for itself, the parasite will also starve with it.

But it’s not just them. The gray masses, who most of us endearingly call normies, are also at high risk. They have become so dependent on “the experts”, the resource providers, even the system itself, and so on, that I highly doubt the vast majority of them could function without the same level of infantile protection as the modern world gives them.

We have a nation of infants. Unable to provide for themselves, short-tempered, and incredibly entitled.

With the struggles that are coming, this is a recipe for disaster.

But what we know is that we can prepare for it.

Let the adult babies continue to be adult babies. It just reduces competition for us in the future.

Meanwhile, you get out there, face the struggles, and get your life together. When nature reverts us back to the normal conditions, which it always does, you’ll be one of the very few who make it out on top.

The post A Population Plagued with Infantilism appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The entire premise of our political system is that it’s a mechanism for the will of ordinary Americans to influence the policies of our government. In reality, all of our politicians are for sale and national discourse is shaped by the media so this is utterly fraudulent.

In other words, the system serves as a facade for Jews who can buy everyone and own the media. It therefore produces outcomes that are contrary to the needs and desires of ordinary Americans without being honest about much of anything.

One thing in particular would be a genocide conducted in Gaza which has turned the entirety of world opinion against America, which purports to lead the “free world” according to a rules-based international order as the foremost arbiter of morality. Media consumed by ordinary Americans has deliberately left them in the dark about just how badly global opinion has turned against our country over this ongoing crime against humanity.

Worse yet, the Jews have sparked a broader conflict in the Middle East which has hampered global shipping and humiliated the U.S. Navy, forced American pilots to put their lives on the line defending Israel from an Iranian missile barrage in retaliation for murder committed by the Jews, incurred American casualties on military installations in the region erected on behalf of Israel, and threatens to escalate into a much broader conflict pretty much at any moment which would result in massive American losses along with a host of other problems I can’t catalogue in one article.

The only thing stopping this escalation is the restraint of the Jews in Israel, who’ve thus far utilized very little and operate with no regards to the optics of their actions. So, American taxpayers must continue to pay for the instruments of genocide and American military personnel must deliver them as the risks continue to mount.

Nowhere in the mainstream media is there any honest commentary about what’s going on available to Americans, whom the Jews in Israel driving these events expect to sacrifice everything on their behalf in a war against Iran, as if nobody else has legitimate interests but themselves. Netanyahu’s visit to Congress should serve as a jarring reminder to Americans that their representatives don’t represent them, and this system of power is something other than what has been purported to them.

Benjamin Netanyahu received 53 standing ovations during his speech to the US Congress, making up about half of the speech's duration.#US #Israel #Palestine #Gaza #yenisafakenglish pic.twitter.com/tMvYiO5xN4

— Yeni Şafak English (@yenisafakEN) July 25, 2024

They were clapping so much he had to tell them to stop so that he could make his point. If this system represented us, we’d have affordable healthcare, a stable currency, an actual border, safe and pleasant communities, a reasonable cost of living, low levels of mental illness, high rates of family formation, low rates of divorce, a sustainable birthrate, and zero discrimination institutionalized against us. We don’t have any of these things but instead we have Congress giving Joseph Stalin applause to Netanyahu while he conflates the interests of Jews and Americans:

“We’re not only protecting ourselves. We’re protecting you … Our enemies are your enemy, our fight is your fight, and our victory will be your victory,”

Why are their enemies our enemies? Why should Arabs who live thousands of miles away and are fighting to resist being ethnically cleansed from their own soil be our enemies? Why would someone be “evil” for refusing to forfeit their lives and land to the Jews? Why are Iranians also “evil” for supporting their struggle? What is the underlying telos of the Jewish religion which produces such a doctrine?

How is Israel protecting us from anyone? How would the victory of the Jews over the Arabs and Iranians be our victory? How does anything Israel is doing comport with international law and universal standards of morality which are rejected only by the Jews?

If Biden has been telling us his entire presidency that the greatest threat to our national security is white supremacy right here in America, how is Israel protecting us by slaughtering Arabs in the Middle East by the tens of thousands?

What is it about Israel that makes it so supportable by the USA? Why would it be an “antisemitic conspiracy theory” to declare that this state of affairs is the product of something other than the interests and will of Americans?

Is it not strange that the prime minister of a tiny country with roughly 10 million people gets to come and dictate to the united assembled legislature of another massive country with a population of nearly 335 million, some of the world’s foremost combat capabilities, and the reserve currency, which is financially subsidizing and protecting his country’s existence both politically and militarily?

Is it not odd that this vastly more powerful country’s leadership is held hostage by whatever he decides to do? Why is it taken for granted in the media and political discourse that none of the above questions are legitimate?

In a fiery speech in the House chamber, Netanyahu called for “total victory” in the nine-month-old war, dashing hopes among some that he would announce progress toward a ceasefire and the return of Israeli hostages before his meetings with Joe Biden at the White House on Thursday.

Objectively, this is absolutely insane and can’t be explained in any way by the collective interests and will of Americans. It would appear that the purpose of this speech was for Netanyahu to come here for some cheerleading in order to set the stage for escalation.

It looks like the Jews have decided that Trump will work out best for them, so his presidency will be an opportune time to pull the trigger. The stars do seem to be aligning quite conveniently for Trump and he couldn’t have a better opponent than Kamala Harris who was immediately installed as the candidate by party authority, not her electability.

NEWS: Miriam Adelson is set to bankroll a pro-Trump super PAC, giving Trump a major financial boosthttps://t.co/zrT1XyhNOf

— Alex Isenstadt (@politicoalex) May 30, 2024

Remember, retarded Jews are driving events now. All they’ve known is Israel and the criminal privileges it confers on its citizens. These aren’t the caliber of Jews who hijacked America and lack their sensitivities to other peoples’ opinions, having known nothing but being above criticism in their own ethnostate.

This bloodthirsty idiot represents the expanding demographic keeping Nentanyahu on top. He’s basically giving the game away. From the Times of Israel:

Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir endorsed Donald Trump for president in a highly irregular move, as top officials from both nations usually avoid wading into one another’s internal politics and do not wish to be seen as favoring one side over another.

His comments, in an interview published Wednesday, came at a particularly inconvenient time for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is in Washington and was set to meet Thursday with US President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, the likely Democratic nominee in the coming election.

In an interview with Bloomberg, Ben Gvir asserted that a win for Trump in the November vote would be better for Israel, implying that only the Republican nominee would offer support for action against Tehran.

“I believe that with Trump, Israel will receive the backing to act against Iran,” Ben Gvir told Bloomberg. “With Trump it will be clearer that enemies must be defeated.”

Trump isn’t running on a war for Israel, and it’s doubtful he’d order one if he gets elected. He isn’t stupid, so he understands that these projects never work out for the United States and has been quite vocal about it. The U.S. military has been so exploited, abused, and depleted it couldn’t win a war anyways.

What’s more likely is he’d find himself reacting to a crisis contrived by the Jews and start making decisions on the advice of his advisors, such as his son-in-law Jared Kushner, whose family is closely aligned with Netanyahu. It would be difficult to control the escalation once something gets going.

I really hope I’m wrong, but it seems this situation is going to get quite kinetic and that’s going to be very bad for all of us. What else can you expect from our democracy? Trump made some pretty awful decisions on behalf of Israel but limited the military ones to strikes and kept us out of a war the last time around. However, Israel hadn’t created such a catastrophe for itself back then, either.

Trump is desperate for Miriam Adelson's cash. Her condition: West Bank annexation / @slyomovics https://t.co/EOClWcG9g8

— Haaretz.com (@haaretzcom) June 3, 2024

An upside to Netanyahu’s speech is that Americans got to see 53 minutes of clapping to remind them who is really in charge. By the way, Biden made a sort of farewell address from the Oval Office last night reminding us that that things have never been better domestically and exhorting us to defend our democracy. This is all a sick joke, but when you’re living in it things aren’t so funny.

As I watched his speech, I knocked one back and thought to myself: This is why I drink.

The post Results from our Representation appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

If you’ve had the misfortune of interacting with a Generation Z female, you might have heard them use the phrase “the ick.” For example, if a fat greaseball with zero social skills tips his fedora to a woman and says, “m’lady,” she’ll describe the encounter to her friends as having given her “the ick.”

The ick describes an uneasiness, sense of disgust, or anxiety that a woman experiences when something from reality crashes into her otherwise meticulously maintained fantasy world. No, you’re not so attractive that losers won’t still attempt to hit on you. Do they think you’re in their league? Maybe. Or maybe they read too much pick-up-artist blogs. Or maybe you are in their league and you’re in denial. After all, Gorloc The Destroyer thinks he’s a 10 as a woman. Whatever the case, reality knocketh.

This is possibly one of the greatest distillations of the feminine conceptualization of the world. We have to thank Zoomers for boiling down what people have written blogposts, essays, and even books outlining as the female emotional reactivity to externalities to two simple words: the ick. A terminally short attention span actually generated something useful.

The phrase doesn’t just have implications for social interactions. It also holds great explanatory power for female political motivations, particularly on the Left. A picture of a sad Syrian kid who just wants to live on the German taxpayer’s dime? The ick. Let him and all of his fighting-age cousins and siblings in. A black man being confronted by a mob of angry White people after he tried to steal something out of somebody’s backyard? The ick. White people have too much stuff anyways. Parents protesting drag queen story hour? The ick. Those poor trannies need to share their story with the world, including vulnerable children.

There’s no attempt to entertain the reasonable objections from the other side. The only thing that even approaches the level of “reasoned argumentation” is the repetition of canned slogans that were seeded by media and entertainment. When a leftist harpy says, “no human is illegal,” what she’s really saying is, “sad brown people give me the ick.” We have to let them in so that the media will stop showing her the footage and pictures of sad brown people that provoke this ick.

In healthier days, the ick factor might have actually been beneficial. The ick is, after all, attuned to social norms. If you have a healthy society with good values and religious fervor, a woman’s going to get the ick when she sees some guy wearing a dress, and she’s going to demand that somebody make the ick go away. She’s not going to go through some John Stuart Mill moral utilitarian flow chart of whether this decreases the good of the commons enough to warrant imposing limitations on the guy in a skirt. It makes her unhappy, and she’s going to complain about it bitterly until somebody does something about it.

Our problem is that this has been inverted. She’s now complaining about the people complaining about the guy in the dress. What was meant to be a visceral, innate, and instinctive reaction against things that violate tradition has become a tantrum in the name of perpetual revolution. We have to recognize that when leftist women agitate for various causes or things, the root lies with the fact that these things trigger an emotional revulsion against the correct position. They have no arguments to make or justifications to advance for their position. It’s based purely on emotional phenomena. Unfortunately, women are allowed to exercise electoral power based on their emotional phenomena. That gives me the ick.

The post “The Ick” as a Political Paradigm appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

We’re deep into summer, and that means it’s car show season. I’ve been to a couple with my young kids, as they love cars. I went to one that really put things into perspective for me.

This particular car show was virtually all-American cars, from modern muscle like Dodge Hellcats and Ford Mustang GTs to vintage pieces from America’s glory years, like Ford Coupes, GTOs, and Chevelles. Most of these vehicles were all lovingly maintained and improved from their original manufacturer. The vintage cars were especially impressive. These were almost all owned by Boomers. It makes sense. Vintage cars require a lot of time and money to restore and maintain properly. Other shows feature rare cars, often foreign, that the owner had to hunt down and acquire. Sometimes, they feature interesting cars that require some nuance and understanding of the automotive hobby to appreciate.

There was, however, another class of car at this particular show. There were at least six brand new Corvette Stingrays and even a few Z06s gleaming in the sunlight with their Boomer owners grinning proudly next to them. These are, of course, the Corvettes that are built to look like modern Lamborghinis or Ferraris in the squat-and-wide shape rather than the long-and-thin shape everybody remembers the Corvette for. In all likelihood, these cars have less than 10k miles on them and nothing beyond an oil change in terms of maintenance, much less modification. The drivers likely require assistance getting in and out of them.

These Boomers, being superficial, fundamentally misunderstand the nature of a car show. They see it as a place to show up and flaunt an impressive piece of 4-wheeled machinery that other people envy. What they miss is why people envy the owners of the other cars. Vintage cars hearken back to a better age in the United States, and the dedication required to keep them running demands its own appreciation. Modern cars that people have modified to make faster or better looking also require a decent amount of mechanical inclination. It’s not just envy of the machine, it’s envy and admiration of the drive possessed by the owner to maintain and improve the machine and their eye for the uniqueness of the vehicle.

Nobody is impressed by Bob Smith driving down to the Chevy dealership, picking one of the dozen Corvettes they have on the lot, paying cash for it from his reverse-mortgage, and driving it out to impress everybody else. There are a lot more interesting cars you could get for $70k or $115k. It almost reminds one of the newly enlisted private who buys a new Camaro for 30% APR thinking it will make him cool, at least until he drives it back to the barracks parking lot and pulls in next to all of the other Camaros, Mustangs, and Chargers. Meanwhile, the car dealer laughs and the platoon sergeant cries.

Driving back, we saw another car on the road. It was a heavily modified fifth-generation Nissan 350z with custom exhaust, a body kit, and no doubt some work under the hood. A White millennial drove it. I don’t think it would have gone over well at the car show. The show was America-themed and there were less than five Japanese cars there. All of them were over 40 years old and considered “vintage.” Even if all of the entrants weren’t Boomers, the vast majority were, and the “American muscle” vibe was prominent. That said, this car exhibited far more of the “pride in your ride” attitude and sense of craftsmanship than all of the late-model Corvettes put together. It wasn’t as obviously “draped-in-the-American-flag” as the vaunted Corvette, but it was draped in something else: the ingenuity, dedication, and pride that made America worth something in the first place.

The post Buying Your Way into the Club appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

As I am writing this article, Biden has stepped aside from his reelection campaign, and baring some kind of last-minute chicanery, Vice President Kamala Harris is the likely nominee. Whereas the optics will change from frail, older White man whose facilities have long since departed, to a younger (59) black-Indian female, the election dynamics will not change. Effectively, it is Trump versus the Establishment – or more accurately, the current Establishment in power (Harris) versus the Establishment out of power (Trump). The policies will not change much, regardless of the election outcome. If Trump wins, there may be more competence and consistency at the border, lower gas prices, and some targeting of inflation. But the system is still in charge, even when the establishment changes power positions. The will of the people is all for the sake of optics to keep the system humming. After all, happy lemmings continue to prop up the system through compliance (taxes, volunteer military service, etc.).

It is important to remember that the system is “The Deep State,” but it is not that “deep.” It is hardly in the shadows. It is the governing ecosystem found within the halls of the various bureaucratic offices of Washington, D.C. It has become an organism all its own. The people do not run the United States through their vote. Rather, the system continues to operate and ignores the will of the people. This reality is reflected in our political choices.

The face of a political race is critical because it is often part of the system’s messaging and social programming. Rather than the Left and Right represented by two older White males, the contrast is drawn more distinctly. “Old America” – seeking to return to greatness – is represented rhetorically by Donald Trump, a White male septuagenarian. “New” America – seeking a radical Marxist Dawn – is represented by a younger, black female, Kamala Harris. The distinctions tell you a lot about the system’s goals. If Trump is allowed to win, it will be a nod toward an elevation of capacity over social justice. Trump, for all his faults, is strong on the economy, the border, and traditional national security (i.e., a posture of strength that dissuades global threats). Harris is ridiculously incompetent – as evidenced by the border (although, I believe that was willful, not incompetence). If the system allows Harris to defeat Trump, it is telling the world that DEI is more important than competent White leaders. In effect, we will have entered a post-White world, as the old White man is defeated on the international stage by the young(er) black woman.

To his credit (or lack thereof), Trump seems to have learned this lesson. Yes, Trump still peddles the anti-deep state rhetoric. It is red meat for his base. The fact that he chose a Silicon Valley darling in J.D. Vance, however, betrays a new Trump that understands the system cannot be beaten – it can only be co-opted. The only way to win is to embrace the system and attempt to add some legacy of your own to the power dynamics that control the system. In essence, find establishment players to work the system to your benefit. That is hard to do.

The old establishment – structured around Wall Street and Hollywood – is at odds with the new establishment – structured around high technology. Neither Harris nor Trump’s policies necessarily square with the presumed goals of their establishment masters. Harris is not a friend to Wall Street, but Wall Street benefits off of traditional Democrat policies. Trump is not a friend to high technology – as evidenced by his battles with social media. That stated, Trump’s vice-presidential nominee is well versed in the new tech world and more importantly, the cyber-monetary systems that are making them extremely powerful. The system knows the old establishment better than it knows or understands the new, emerging establishment. Typically, one thing will happen; either the system will seek to break the emerging threat of a new establishment by doubling down on its support of the old establishment (currently back in power) and therefore killing the new establishment in its infancy or the system will seek to co-opt the new establishment to make it one of its own. In fact, it started to do this, as evidenced by the several years around COVID-19 and the 2020 election, whereby the system shut down free speech throughout the social media landscape (the exception being Gab). This was the system showing the new establishment who is boss. What the system was not capable of appreciating was the fact that the new establishment – independently wealthy and dominating the mechanisms of communications – no longer feels like playing second fiddle to legacy establishment types. They seek to reform the system by making it an outgrowth of their own principles. Some may say that Elon Musk is/was the leader in this movement, but I do not believe that is the case. I think it is bigger than Musk, as evidenced by another super wealthy cyber billionaire, Mark Zuckerberg.

Zuckerberg was the first to launch a shot at the system in 2024. Facebook reopened its platform to Trump before the debate, ostensibly to allow all candidates to have a voice. Musk did this earlier, but Musk never had a squabble with Trump as Zuckerberg did. Was this a change of heart for Zuckerberg? Not at all. I believe it was a matter of an opportunistic Zuckerberg smelling the political winds shifting and learning from his Silicon Valley peers that they plan to launch their own coup. Zuckerberg’s calculation was probably one in which he sought to join the others or get chewed up by powerful people who know how the cyberworld works. He would rather be inside the new establishment and play a role in forming a new system, than find himself outside of it.

Regardless, the spokesperson for the new establishment will not be Trump. He will keep the lemmings leaping. It will be J.D. Vance, who will use his office (if elected) to set the groundwork for a new establishment and by extension, a modified system. This is where all of this comes back to the system itself. It is still all powerful. It is going nowhere. Who guides the system will be one of the system’s own choosing. It chose to get rid of Biden. It chose to steal the 2020 election. It will choose its path – new or old – this November. No matter what happens, the system will remain the system, and that beast is too large to kill without an act of God (which I believe is coming). Since we do not know which way the system will go, the best we can do is wait and prepare ourselves and our families for a dystopian future that comes from systems that eventually devour themselves by virtue of hubris and miscalculation.

The system will eventually fail, but until then, the system is the system – and it just said, “Goodbye, Mr. Biden.” You cannot beat the system until it beats itself, first – which it always eventually does.

The post Goodbye, Mr. Biden appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In the aftermath of the assassination attempt on Trump, it is increasingly clear, barring extreme cheating or a successful attempt on his life, that he will beat ~~Creepy Joe~~ (or whomever is the nominee of the Democratic Party) in November. As Southern Nationalists, we need to be realistic and judge his second term with a pragmatic lens. We should not be carried away with the euphoria of his American Nationalist fans and their screams of “USA, USA, USA.” I hope to address the pitfalls of another Trump presidency, not to tell our people not to vote in November, but merely to prepare them for what’s to come.

One of the biggest things forgotten by Magapedes is that Trump isn’t nationally popular, especially with moderates (who decide national elections). Trump is winning currently due to the economy, which Biden and his handlers purposely made increasingly worse. That’s what is turning milquetoast suburbanites away from Biden. In short, they aren’t being motivated to vote for Trump in mass, though some will, but merely that it’s not worth backing Biden’s successor (yesterday, he endorsed Kamala Harris after withdrawing from the race). Their motivations aren’t to “Make America Great Again” but to live more comfortably and be able to buy cheap trinkets so they can get back to their streaming shows and sportsball. Their “loyalty,” if one can call it that, is dependent solely on economic consumption. Many of these people in Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Wisconsin could care less about fixing the degenerate culture of the United States; in fact, many like the current libertine culture of Weimar-America.

One of the biggest threats to Trump’s second term is the shaky economy. After decades of non-stop spending by the federal government, its currency is increasingly becoming more and more worthless. The threat of the dollar collapsing is a fatal one (if it occurs). It’s no surprise that the GOP platform explicitly expresses the need to keep the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency. Without that, the American Empire would quickly collapse. The dollar, and its buying power, is the key for keeping the American Empire united – as stated before, modern Americans love their cheap toys and entertainment more than liberty. It should be noted that the American Empire has been losing more and more respect and legitimacy due to various factors: from its displays of homosexuality, divided politics, to its defeat in Afghanistan.

Thanks to the virtue signaling of the Biden administration, and the West, many Third World countries have become nervous about the power of the dollar after the failed sanctions against Russia. In the same light, many countries now view Russia’s economy prospering after such failed sanctions and are re-evaluating the power of the American Empire. This is why for the first time since 2010 we are watching countries join BRICS, such as Egypt, Iran, and Ethiopia. It should be noted that numerous countries have applied and are considering joining BRICS. In addition, supposed American-aligned countries, like Saudi Arabia and India, are defending Russia much to the chagrin of the Washington ruling class. The U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen has recently admitted that the sanctions used to bully countries like Russia, Iran and others. I’d argue that even if the economy doesn’t collapse in 2025, it won’t get better due to the damage already inflicted via the mass funding of Ukraine. When the turn around doesn’t happen, Trump will be unfairly blamed by goldfish-brained “moderates.”

Another issue with Trump is foreign policy. His first term was a mixed bag, from making peace with North Korea being a highlight, while killing Iranian General Qasem Soleimani and bombing Syria as negatives. While Trump has had friendly relations with Putin, he’s also done nothing to stop the congressional funding to Ukraine. Speaker Johnson was actually strongly defended by Trump in April when he lied to his voters by passing Ukraine funding without the border being secured. He went as far as, two weeks prior, to say that Ukraine was necessary to the Empire’s interests, while also stating that Russia’s peace terms were not acceptable. Putin is open to working with Trump, and likely vice versa, but would Trump be willing to openly clash with the war hawks in his own party, those that he’s currently aligned with and backed? An even bigger foreign policy issue is Israel and Trump’s Zionism.

From an Israel perspective, a Trump presidency would be much more aggressive as he’d have more mainstream voter support, especially from his political allies. If Israel and Hezbollah do go to war this month, or in the following months, it could kick up a far more widespread conflict as Hezbollah has the means to push into Northern Israel. Israel could be seriously put on its back foot. In such a scenario, Trump, the GOP, and his Boomer base would be foaming at the mouth and may go as far as putting boots on the ground or committing to air strikes. On the furthest end, Trump may escalate and go after Iran directly. We could see a situation where he assassinates more of its leadership and provokes a full-scale war. In this case, many leftist activists, already pro-Palestinian, could escalate their “protests” and riots and possibly a real insurrection. A war with Iran or even Hezbollah (Lebanon) would not be popular with moderates nor with Gen Z (who would be called to fight in such a war). In many ways, this could be part of the reason why AIPAC-owned Congress made the draft registration mandatory for young men.

An American-Iran war would be on par with what the Great War did to the Russian, Ottoman, and Austrian Empires. In effect, it would bring out the divides and anger bubbling under the surface, as well as, effectively destroy the dollar’s dominance. The amount of money needed to be spent in such a conflict, and the unpopularity at home, would quickly put us in the place of the Russian Empire in 1917. While the fact the actual losses would not get into the millions, one should remember American Vietnam casualties never surpassed 300,000, the death count of American soldiers was approximately 59,000. In 2025, would the American public be willing to accept the deaths of only a few thousand for the sake of Israel? For sure, Republican politicians would, as well as some die-hard evangelical Zionists, but Trump and the GOP would certainly lose the midterms. Assuming they survive the aggressive anti-war movement, which would make the 1960s look like child’s play. We’ve already gotten a preview of such protests and how the GOP would respond (when Israel is slandered the gloves come off). We could see such protests and crackdowns quickly escalate into full-on street battles.

A war with Hezbollah and a downward spiral of the economy under Trump would be a potent weapon for the Democrats and ensure that Trump is abandoned by moderates. Thanks to the Supreme Court handing Democrats a district in Alabama and Louisiana, Congress could flip blue in 2026, something no Magapedes are mentioning as they fantasize about Trump winning all 50 states. Indeed, many Trump’s supporters seem solely focused on him winning in November, rather than the possibility he will not have any power in office. They think he’s winning because he’s promising a return to 1950s America and an end to the Democrats. In reality, his platform is weak and mostly focused on the economy and building up the military. He has already strongly denounced the rightwing paleoconservative agenda of Project 2025. He has been rallying with Log Cabin Republicans and walking back from abortion. Short of actually ending “American Democracy” (mob rule, plus liberal oligarchs oversight), something I’m not opposed to destroying, there’s no way he’s removing the rot of the American Empire. Throwing more money at the already bloated and overpaid military will not fix America. Nor will granting massive tax cuts to reward the corrupt donor class. Trump cannot and will not do such things. The white pill for the South is that we can still survive and come out as an independent nation during such a crisis.

Trump’s future defeat and destruction, if he takes the road mentioned above, doesn’t mean we need to follow him down that path. We need to be focused on being the voice of reason and readying those Southerners willing to listen to make steps toward independence. Don’t let 2024 distract you from the ultimate goal of Free South. America’s difficulty is Dixie’s opportunity. We should view ourselves as the Poles or the Finnish during the Great War, who kept their focus on freeing themselves from a foreign occupier. While things play out nationally, the Southern Nationalist must look for opportunities to free his people.

-By Young Fire Eater

The post Trump as the Last President appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

There has never been a point in American history, or even pre-American history, where political violence – that is, violence consciously intended to affect a political end – has not been the preoccupation of the American people. America was, in a large part, founded via a general race-war, where every colonist understood they lived in a metaphorical and literal dark forest, which they were slowly beating into civilization while in incredible danger. Approximately their first political action on the continent was to build a fort and form a militia – that is, an organization for deploying violence on behalf of their community. The American Revolution was distinguished from Old World conflicts largely by the pretense that it was undertaken on behalf of “the People,” which justified, again, the violence they were about to enact against both representatives of the British government, and locals who refused to get with the program. In all cases these were basically farmers and merchants, not some local “sovereign” – it was well understood that if you pissed off or threatened a sufficient number of them, it was within their rights to band together as a polity and just flatly kill you.

I could go through two hundred and fifty years of American political history, from the Indian Wars, the institution of slavery and the political organizations set up to suppress slave rebellions, Bleeding Kansas, the Wide-Awakes, the Civil War, Reconstruction, suppression of German-American organizations, internment of Axis nationals, the (half-assed) suppression of communist organizations, the revolutionary and racial violence of the 60s and 70s, the wave of assassinations of politicians between the 60s and 80s, and so on. Most of those were done on a freelance basis, with some faction of the polity of the country engaging in coordinated political violence outside the formal direction of the state – although many of them were retroactively blessed with their approval.

So, it is disingenuous in the extreme that, having labeled Trump as Hitler, Caesar, et al, and begging some rando to rid the body politic of this turbulent racist, Democrats are now clutching their pearls about the unacceptability of political violence. It was plenty acceptable to them in 2020, when the country was lit on fire, complete with an attempted coup at the White House, in an event they still refer to as a “racial reckoning.” That word, “reckoning” – that is, settling accounts – again, using political violence to advance a political agenda.

The only distinction with the assassination attempt is that it did not, in this case, work. Trump evidently is capped out at a 20 Luck stat, immune to small arms, and cannot contract Covid. He is a machine for turning cheeseburgers into holes-in-one. He is dancing, dancing. He says that he will never die. I kind of believe him.

So, when an assassin was allowed, yes allowed, on the only fucking building possible to send rifle fire from, an elevated, stable position, a mere 150 yards away, point-blank range, while locals pointed out “Hey cops, there’s a guy climbing up to the roof with a rifle,” and managed to light off eight rounds, killing one and critically wounding another two – a bullet grazed Trump’s ear and missed splattering his brains over the crowd in live 4K by about two millimeters. Instead of being killed on the spot, the man raised a fist to the crowd in possibly the most iconic presidential photo of all time, which happened to be perfectly framed by a past and future Pulitzer Prize winning photographer and escaped basically unharmed.

You couldn’t possibly write this as fiction without being a hack. This is, from the perspective of the establishment uniparty, when you raise the cross and the supersoaker full of holy water to the vampire and he grins and bares his teeth because we’re Subverting Tropes. It’s divine intervention that seems to indicate a level of concrete mandate-of-heaven usually only posited as some kind of Daoist metaphor. It should frankly send you to church.

Thus, we get the spectacle of the Gay Communist Race War party sighing “thank God Hitler was only wounded! We’re all, uh, Americans here, the good kind that comes together for disgusting barbeques or whatever and not the kind that lives on Stolen Land and needs total extirpation.” These are completely transparent crocodile tears. If it had worked, as all parts were arranged to, they would be making mouth-noises about how sad they are that it came to this and they would have rather won the election, but this just shows the inevitable consequences of Trump’s hate, so ironic when you think about it, do you get it? Btw, health issues, and let’s raise a glass to our first Canadian President, Kamala.

They are sad in the exact sense that a child is sad when he misses a pinata. “I’ll never get it! I feel dizzy and sick! Violence never solves anything!” In reality, he’s going to get a pep talk and another swing, for as long as it takes. If you are a pinata-American, so to speak, the continual punching bag of the uniparty, you need to understand that we are not “all coming together to denounce violence because the one thing we can agree on is etc.”, we are taking a brief breather for an optics check because Timmy got too enthusiastic and whacked another partygoer with a stick.

To his credit, Trump appears to understand this and is not at this time pulling a Romneyesque conciliatory concession. “Defiant in the face of evil” is a much better play. Because the only way that this stops is not by some nebulous and temporary “temperature lowering,” but by dismantling the concrete infrastructure that made it possible. Political violence is not going away. It never went away, and it will, unfortunately, be back. The only question is whether it will be legitimate violence, with a popular mandate and for the benefit of the American people, directed against those who consciously place themselves in opposition to the American polity, at a level as minimal as required to get the job done – or a never ending stream of thugs and terrorists attacking the avatars of the American people until they can start slaughtering the people themselves.

-By Hank Oslo

The post Political Violence is as American as Apple Pie appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

This election is certainly proving to be interesting, but one thing we can be sure that we’re not getting out of it is representation. What appears to be happening is that Washington is in the process of abandoning the neoconservative project in Ukraine, which is proving to be yet another unmitigated failure, to focus on defending Israel in the war it started against Hezbollah and Hamas.

Jews are to blame for both conflicts, but they’re not part of the same scheme and there are different factions of Jews at play in both. The neocons are Jews from the former Soviet Union descended from Trotskyists who are currently masquerading as hawkish, patriotic Americans. Everything they do is wrapped in a preposterous moral guise and discussed by them in terms of the international order and American national security.

Essentially, what they’re attempting is to globalize Jewish supremacy by eliminating all power independent of their golem, Uncle Sam. The conflict in Ukraine was meant to drag the Russians into a quagmire to justify sanctions that would collapse their economy and implode the Russian Federation. It would then be “decolonized” into controllable entities.

The Jews behind Israel’s current fiasco aren’t really doing any masquerading. They’re bloodthirsty retards raised on a blank check from the USA who have difficulty appreciating immediate consequences. They don’t give a damn about optics, having lived their entire lives above accountability in Israel where Jews no longer had to care about what those around them thought about their behavior.

This is how the world watches in outrage as bombs are dropped on hospitals, churches, and refugee camps while the perpetrators remain indifferent to everyone else’s opinion. The backlash is going to be very unpleasant for these Jews, but this is something they’re unable to take into account.

They’re seeking to eliminate their opposition in the Middle East so it can be settled by their retarded children whom they produce in large batches, in contrast to the more normal Jews, who are dying out. Demographic transformation has placed them in the driver’s seat of events, whereas before it was only Jews capable of passing as normal, like the neocons who were calling the shots.

This development is critical for understanding how what’s happening in the Middle East is a dramatic departure from decades past. It’s not something cooked up in Washington think tanks under the facade of American security as part of a broader scheme for global domination like the Global War on Terror. Some of these Jews are so demented they literally believe that their demon will grant them the rest of humanity as slaves after they sacrifice a red heifer in an occult ritual.

Ultranationalist Israeli Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir desecrates the courtyards of Al-Aqsa Mosque in occupied Jerusalem. pic.twitter.com/m6Fb3fXyn0

— Quds News Network (@QudsNen) July 18, 2024

One gets the impression from both Trump and Vance that they don’t fully grasp what’s going on in Ukraine, which is understandable since I’ve never met a single member of the U.S. military who does either. However, the failure part is obvious along with the fact that whoever controls Ukraine is immaterial to Americans suffering from inflation and an ongoing societal collapse. Even if things were going well, it still wouldn’t matter to them.

What’s also plain to see is that Israel is in an existential crisis, and as our foremost priority, that’s where the focus of American foreign policy has to be placed instead. Moreover, no incoming administration will want to take the blame when the fighting in Ukraine comes to an end decisively in the favor of Russia. Whoever is in charge will therefore be looking for a way to extricate themselves and put the blame on Biden while Americans forget the whole thing in Ukraine happened and learn nothing from it.

Politically, failure in Ukraine is something the next administration can get through just fine if the timing is sooner rather than later. We have the Global War on Terror as a playbook for this one. The humiliation in Afghanistan back in 2021 is a non-issue for Biden in the 2024 elections. This is the ugly reality of the American voter.

At this point we are actively endangering our national security by focusing on Ukraine to the exclusion of other priorities.

A slow running disaster from the Biden admin. https://t.co/9l0DQ85xuG

— JD Vance (@JDVance1) June 20, 2024

At this point, it’s probably good news for the Ukrainians since without American support there’s no way for them to continue fighting. Some sort of settlement will have to be negotiated with the Russians to end the slaughter. The problem is that for Americans, our next step could be getting sucked into a direct conflict in the Middle East.

The Netanyahu Jews want to decisively defeat Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran while seizing all of Lebanon between the border and the Litani River. This probably isn’t even possible with direct American intervention, but without it, their goals would be absolutely impossible to achieve so the implications are rather disconcerting.

Already more than 46,000 businesses have folded in Israel with roughly 60,000 projected to be the total by the end of this year. Heavy losses have been taken by the IDF in both personnel and equipment to the point where it’s admitting shortages of tanks and munitions. Riots are breaking out as the government moves to draft the bipedal rats in funny outfits who claim their religious activities alone are a sufficient contribution to national security. The price paid by Israel thus far is too steep for them to accept gaining nothing.

The options for the Netanyahu Jews are to tacitly admit failure by packing things up, which would be political suicide, or take things too far and drag the U.S. military into the conflict. Jews always take things too far, so in all likelihood what remains to be seen is how exactly the United States gets dragged into the conflict.

Just because candidates fawn over Israel because that’s for their personal political benefit doesn’t mean they’re so irrational they want a new war for America in the Middle East. There are some Republican psychopaths like Lyndsey Graham who do, but none of them are headed for the White House.

The notion of a new war is deeply unpopular with voters and the military proposition itself is unfeasible. Politically, it amounts to a commitment to catastrophe. In other words, fighting this war outright for Israel isn’t something for which America will be volunteering itself no matter who wins in November. If we get dragged in, expect plenty of the usual Jewish chicanery and no admission from our elected officials that we’re fighting purely for the Jews at the expense of everyone else.

J. D. Vance speaks to a crowd of Orthodox Jews.

"In America, we love the Jews." pic.twitter.com/Rv59pPa5GO

— Frum TikTok (@FrumTikTok) July 15, 2024

The post Conflict in the Cards? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Those of you who have followed me over the past several years know that I am no fan of Donald Trump. As a president, Trump was probably the most consequentially disastrous president for the South in the post-Reconstruction Era of American history. More Southern monuments were torn down under Trump than any every other president since Garfield combined. He could have used the National Historic Register to preserve those monuments, but Trump wanted black votes and White anger. His apologists like to claim those monuments are protected under the state, not the federal government. That is not true. The federal government enjoys the power to protect monuments or architecture of historical significance when the state fails to do so. This is a precedent set by the detestable President Ulysses S. Grant when he established the National Park Service. His inaction is inexcusable.

Additionally, Donald Trump sent more so-called White Nationalists to prison then George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden combined. I still remember the martyrs of R.A.M. His open warfare against White interests and White people knows no limits. Trump did nothing to stop the extraordinary violence of leftist protesters, black rioters, or other anti-White activists in the 2020 “Summer of Love.” He went off the charts in his hatred for those of us who marched at Charlottesville. Many men – including myself – were sent to prison on a myriad of charges, while Trump and his acolytes made excuses for the man.

Trump’s most important constituency does not reside in Cullman, Alabama, or New Braunfels, Texas. They reside in Tel Aviv. No president loved Israel more and it makes sense: almost all of his grandchildren are Jewish. While Trump, who purportedly “loves the whole Bible,” praised Israel, he ignored punitive taxes levied on Christian churches and institutions by the Jewish state while he was president. He could have easily stopped the double tax that is singularly charged against Christians (not Muslims). He ignored it. While Christian pastors sat in Israeli prisons, Trump freed a black rapper named A$AP Rocky.

With the exception of record low gas prices (which is a staple of most Republican administrations) and an application of amnesty laws that slowed illegal migration (note – he fired and publicly humiliated the woman who drafted that policy), Trump was a Category-5 Hurricane on America’s White population – especially the South. He expanded the North African and Middle Eastern migrant program for four straight years – most of whom were relocated to Southern cities, especially in Florida and Tennessee. He never banned transgender freaks from military service – he expanded their entry and oversaw their promotions. Trump simply limited their ability to deploy. Finally, if this was not enough, he was the one who chose DEI-advocate General Mark Miley for Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and J6-Hunter FBI Director Christopher Wray. Trump’s hatred of his own constituency is on full display for anyone who actually takes the time to look at his record.

Yet, White people love the man. For some reason, a South devastated by the policies and intentional inaction of Trump, overwhelmingly vote for him. The billionaire New Yorker with bad hair is adored by millions of White Americans who have been directly and negatively impacted by the former Charlatan-in-Chief. Therein lies the problem.

The fact that Trump is a de facto enemy of my people will not stop my people from wanting more Trump. His rhetoric does not match his actions. But that is the problem for a Bolshevik movement that has gained speed and momentum since the inaugural ascendency of George H. Bush in 1989. Trump’s message and the hope those words imbue are the problem.

The American political “Left” – if such a thing exists in a uniparty world – needs to kill White hope. It needs to destroy the potential of Trump’s message actually making its way into law. The global anti-White cabal does not want Trump’s rhetoric to become Florida’s functional policies. Yes, DeSantis kissed a wall (they all do) and signed an antisemitism bill in Israel (a contrived stunt by two FL representatives), but the vast majority of his Florida policies have been overwhelmingly pro-White and pro-Christian. The primary fear of our adversaries is that an articulate and competent leader may arise and work toward pro-White positions. DeSantis did not have the charisma to take on a juggernaut like Trump, but it is simply a matter of time before someone comes along who not only has the rhetorical capacity to articulate those positions, but the acumen to make them a reality.

Thus, the need for the Left to kill Trump. More specifically, it is their need to kill “the” Trump – the next emerging leader who is quietly learning how to govern and perfecting Trump’s communications ability. The inspiration of Trump is a threat to the system – not the man himself, who actually strengthened the anti-White system from 2017 to 2021.

Killing the Trump means killing the potential for a movement that realistically helps our people. In 2016, many of us, including myself, fell for Trump’s act. He disappointed us greatly. In 2020, I did not vote for Trump. I saw enough.

Just because I did not support Trump in 2020, and will not vote for him in 2024, does not mean I support Biden. It means I voted my conscience which directs me toward my people. I do not want talk. I want action. Short term cheaper gas does not make up for the eventual death of my nation. Policies that help my future generations thrive in a homeland that their forefathers built is my goal. Our enemies want the heart of that dream to be torn to shreds. Therefore, they must kill the Trump idea, even if – by his own actions – he does not believe in the ideals himself.

Whether that is by killing Trump physically (as they attempted on July 13th), politically (as they did in 2020), legally (as they did in a New York courtroom), or by means of internal subversion (such as the selection of a fraud named J.D. Vance), they must kill the Trump. Trump is useless and may himself be a plant to undermine pro-White policies with White lemming support. Regardless, his words have meaning within the hearts of many of my countrymen and correspondingly, our enemies cannot let that hope survive long enough for a more competent and committed leader to emerge.

The post Killing “The” Trump? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The Left has an unhealthy fixation on Trump, obviously, to the point where they need to turn their lines of attack into dogma and catchphrases rather than even concrete complains. He lies (about what?). He’s a bully (to who? and did they deserve it?). And he thinks only about himself.

Yet, Trump’s choice of JD Vance, the first millennial on a major ticket, reflects the opposite of this last point. It would have been the easiest thing in the world to choose a non-entity whose main attraction is, like Spiro Agnew or Kamala Harris, making the Big Guy less likely to be assassinated, and maybe picking up a few votes in whatever microconstituency they reflect. Ben Carson would at least have locked in the hoteps.

Or, he could have gone strictly tactical. Glenn Youngkin would have put more electoral votes in play. Literally Some Woman would have potentially helped with the female swing voter demographic. Elise Stefanik would have brought in more cash.

Trump did none of this. Instead, he went with a comparatively rare move – an ideological successor. JD Vance underperformed in Ohio in his 2022 election, versus other statewide Republican candidates, because he actually takes positions and, more importantly, associates with those whom the uniparty deems beyond the pale.

His relationship with Trump has been at times fraught, describing him in 2016 as potentially “America’s Hitler,” but he evidently took a face turn prior to his senate campaign. You could be forgiven for thinking this could be entirely cynical, given Trump’s popularity in Ohio and his ability to elevate Vance to a position he would be unlikely to reach on his own, but there is frankly a lot of money, institutional support, and media attention for a NeverTrump senator, or even a “Trumpism without Trump” candidate like DeSantis, who is willing to do the bit.

So, I, and apparently Trump, judge his switch to be genuine. This is important, because the danger of an ambitious vice president is that the uniparty pulls a Mike Pence and makes him queen for a day in exchange for betrayal. We just saw on Saturday that this is not an idle fear.

The other side of this is that if he distinguishes himself, Vance is the natural successor to Trump. Trump has never been a “details” guy, and last time around lacked the kind of hatchet men and competent administrators able to deliver, outside of a few key areas like trade. Vance’s extended social network is replete with #ourguys, which makes it likelier he will be able to insert some into actual positions of power and influence.

Ultimately, these social connections are likely more important than Vance’s specific ideological framing or personal relationships, because politics is overwhelmingly about constituencies and personnel rather than policies. Policies are the result of personnel paying off constituencies, not pitches you run up the flagpole to solicit them.

If Trump and Vance can bring those resources to bear to actually dismantle the Left’s networks that have been festering for decades, and do it in a hurry, it’s possible we pull out of the power dive the country has been in for most of living memory.

-By Hank Oslo

The post Vance 2028 appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Trump’s VP Decision: JD VanceJuly 16, 2024 By Kaisar 2 Comments

On JD VanceIt is now official. JD Vance, a self-proclaimed “Catholic Zionist” and anti-China neocon is Trump’s Vice President running mate.

What a choice. Especially given the fact that it is coming out only a couple of days after Trump was nearly assassinated.

It seems like half of the dissident sphere is excited about him, while others are not quite so enthusiastic about his choice.

I hate to always be the bearer of bad news. But I am rather firmly in the latter camp.

First off, Vance is solidly a part of Peter Thiel’s network. He has immensely strong connections to Israel. Prior to the past year of him vying for the VP slot, he would also have been a perfect posterboy for the overall neocon movement. Those two negative marks are a bit hard to overcome for me, even though he says nice things nowadays.

Was it truly a change of heart, or was it just a change of deep state objective? Time will tell.

Regardless, a neocon, Zionist, and previous ‘Never-Trumper’. That would not be my first choice.

JD Vance’s prior thoughts on Trump. Quite the switcheroo, huh?As always: The Wall picture for American politiciansNot a great look. For JD Vance or the RNC.Vance: Married to a Hindu democrat with race-mixed children. The pair were married in Kentucky in 2014, and blessed by a Hindu pundit in a separate ceremony. What a strong Catholic!Always great when our staunch conservatives are related to mRNA technology and progressive firms.…I guess at least it wasn’t Tulsi Gabbard.

Could be worse, but not much to write positively about with this pick. In all honestly, JD Vance has the same limitations that Pence had: A career zionist and neocon.

Guess Trump likes consistency in his VP picks.

Given this pick, Trump is apparently still terrible at choosing appointments and running mates, so not much has changed over the last four years. So much for him “going rogue”.

Looks like we’re stuck with another Pence, boys. Prep the memes:

I have heard a lot of people arguing that “the VP doesn’t really have much power, so it doesn’t matter”. That “all of this is just a fishing expedition to secure the neocons”. But has everyone forgot Pence certified a fraudulent election only four short years ago? If you take political levers and networking connections into account, it turns out the VP has quite a lot of power, it is just in unconventional areas. That is still power, whether it is traditional or not. And I’d prefer that power not be in the hands of a Zionist neocon when the world is already on the brink of World War 3.

But hey, that’s just me.

Oh well. It is what it is. More reasons to buy ammo.

The post Trump’s VP Decision: JD Vance appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

On Saturday afternoon, while en route to a birthday party for an older family member in northwest Georgia, my texts and private messaging apps began receiving multiple messages: “Trump Shot.” One friend sent a clip of the incident. At first glance, it appeared as though the shots may have come from within the crowd, behind Trump. Another angle appeared to show Trump was hit, while another showed it may have missed. As with any such incident, rumors flew all around as to the details. Eventually, throughout the next day, the dust settled, and the information began to solidify. The details tell me this was an attempted assassination sanctioned by government operators.

Here is what we know are “the facts”: a 20-year-old loner with no discernable social media or political footprint drove approximately an hour from his home in western Pennsylvania, identified a perfect sniper’s perch that placed him 130 meters parallel of President Trump, climbed onto the rooftop of the perch, and fired eight rounds from a semiautomatic rifle at the former president, barely missing Trump’s head (tragically killing and wounding others). The Secret Service sniper on a parallel rooftop approximately 200 meters from the shooter, killed the would-be assassin. Let’s break this down.

Thomas Matthew Crooks, the young man who attempted to kill Trump, had no military training. Yet again, like almost every other young, White male shooter, Discord was the only site in which he appears to have had any online presence. Friends of Crooks said that he continued to wear a mask after the Covid “pandemic” was deemed over (masks are generally a sign of a leftwing bias). ABC News initially reported that Crooks was a member of a local “anti-racist” gun club in the Pittsburgh area, but there have been no additional reports on the “anti-racist” element. Regardless, Crooks had no military training, nominal social interaction, and possible gun training through his gun club. How does an untrained man slip through the Secret Service and multiple law enforcement agencies, climb a wall with a rifle, and take eight shots at a major political candidate before being noticed? He doesn’t.

More importantly is the geography of the attack. Crooks was not a local resident. He lived approximately 50 miles away. The rally, while advertised among the Trump voting crowd, was not a highly marketed event. It was a modest rally by Trump standards in a swing state just prior to the Republican National Convention. If Crooks had no real online presence, it is reasonable to ask the following question: how did a young man with nominal interaction online know enough about the rally venue to place himself less than 150 meters from the president on a building located in an area of which he had no comprehensive knowledge? Unfortunately, he is dead, so we will never know.

I have been to Trump rallies when he was president. The security was tight. Myself – a trained Marine, former government employee, and later government contractor who operated in more than seventy-five countries – had no previous knowledge of the rally’s schematics. Crooks somehow knew enough about the rally venue that he was able to position himself parallel to Trump. More importantly, Crooks had no connection to the town, or the rally place itself. He not only knew where to position himself, he knew the perfect building upon which to place himself.

Several reports stated that Trump rally attendees pointed at the young man on the roof and yet, it took at least thirty minutes for law enforcement to send someone to investigate. That could be forgiven IF the Secret Service or another law enforcement body had a protective sniper in that spot [i.e., civilians reporting the presence of an undercover LEO is not uncommon]. There was no law enforcement agency claiming that mantle or position, right? Maybe so.

Those kinds of perimeter positions are discussed in detail with law enforcement personnel to ensure there is no friendly fire among officers due to mistaken identity. In other words, they would have known immediately that someone was not supposed to be on that roof… unless someone said they would be there. If a member of the Sevcret Service stated he would be on that roof, it is then reasonable to dismiss the rally attendees’ concerns. It would also be reasonable to therefore assume that someone told other protective personnel that he/she would occupy that roof, enabling Crooks to take a position without causing concern amongst the rest of the detail and local law enforcement support. It is highly unlikely that the sniper perch that ultimately took out Crooks did not see him get onto the rooftop. You ignore that threat when you are told that the individual is one of your own.

Finally, there is the motive. I am not a fan of Trump. I also do not believe he is the threat that the Left claims him to be. In fact, I think he is the exact opposite of the descriptions attributed to Trump. However, there are some international and internal parties that are rooting for the globalist status quo. Here is my theory, for what it is worth.

In 2016, Trump took the establishment by surprise. I do not think Trump is necessarily part of the establishment or a false flag, as many on the political right believe. I think he was an accidental victor in 2016, hired by the American people as a big “screw you” to the Washington rulers and their minions. By 2020, the establishment was ready for Trump, and they pulled out all the stops – from the plandemic to the riots to the unguarded ballot boxes to the outrageous irregularities regarding computer voting machines. The extent to which the establishment went out of its way to kill the Trump presidency caught other international actors off guard – namely Russia and Israel (both friendly to a Trump presidency). They will not be caught off guard in 2024.

In a very real foreign meddling with American politics, I can envision competing intelligence agencies – Russia and Israel on one side versus American and European agencies on the other – duking it out behind the scenes. The American intelligence agencies will try to do that which they did in 2020 – steal the election – and the foreign intelligence agencies will work to stop them if, for no other reason, to create chaos in the system. This is not uncommon. Such genuine election interference happens frequently.

The belief that Biden could beat Trump in a fair election was crushed after the debate. His drugs did not kick in fast enough and everyone saw what we all knew for years: Biden is mentally deficient. The resultant turmoil within the Democratic Party forced the election back into the hands of unelected, shadowy bureaucrats. No doubt, they are likely already aware of other parties denying or attempting to deny them of the ability to electronically alter the outcomes. State actors in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Arizona likely lack the capacity to take on Russian cyber teams ironically doing more to protect American democracy than “our” own government. The fix may be in, but it is being fought behind closed doors.

Naturally, the next option was to kill Trump – which they just tried to do.

A young man with no training and a minimal online presence was put into a physical position that was a chip shot for any competent shooter. Trump turned his head a split second the shot was fired and survived. The shooting was not a failure in security. It was intentional. It was planned. And I believe they will try again.

The post The Attempt on Trump: Dissecting an Inside Job appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The 2020 election was interesting because Americans got to experience their first color revolution while the nation was locked down due to a fake pandemic and then the precedent of securing victory in swing states with mail-in ballots after the Republican candidate won with actual ballots was established. We’ve got a playbook for 2024 that’s considered totally legitimate, so additional conspiracies are unnecessary.

This unquestionable election was preceded by the 2016 election which set the precedent that an election could be declared illegitimate, and the president impeached due to Russian meddling for which no plausible motive or proof could be offered beyond former and current intelligence officials vowing that this occurred.

In 2016, one was sophisticated and patriotic for understanding that Putin had stolen the election. Four years later, the notion an election could be tampered with was treason. Protesting at the Capitol with MAGA hats was an insurrection against America’s legitimate government, while hordes of violent rioters laying siege to the White House with Trump inside several months earlier was no such attempt.

This is all completely contradictory and schizophrenic because America is hijacked by paranoid Jews trying to maintain some semblance of a false Left-Right political dichotomy and the potential for the voters’ will to be expressed through elections. The results produced by the system are so bad that from this angle alone, it would eventually become impossible to maintain.

An additional problem is that they’re propelled by hatred and fear. To make matters worse, the political class and functionaries employed by Jews don’t appreciate the sensibilities required to maintain the illusion. The result is that things go too far, and the facade is tottering much earlier than it could under more realistic management.

It would’ve been much better for them to have let Trump win in 2020, maintain the illusion, and be rid of him for good five months from now. There’s nobody else like Trump out there who could catch the system off guard like he did in 2016, and he wasn’t really against their agenda to a significant degree. To the extent that he tried to go against it, he was nullified by his own administrative apparatus. He seems to be motivated mostly by his own self-aggrandizement anyways.

However, the fact that Trump gave White Americans the impression they could have their actual interests, such as stopping mass migration, accommodated by the system was too much for Jews to handle emotionally. I remember how much fun that was in the right-wing dissident sphere back in 2016, and we should’ve known they can’t even let us have our fun.

You can't deny Trump is a gangster as fuck pic.twitter.com/JGBH5nsiRP

— Jake Shields (@jakeshieldsajj) July 13, 2024

What’s never discussed outside our sphere is that a significant portion of the vote that put Trump over the top in 2016 came from White voters labeled as “extremists” by Jews, who never vote due to their cynical and accurate understanding of the current system of power in America. While Trump increased his overall vote total in 2020, and no other incumbent who has ever done that had lost, many of us didn’t bother to turn out a second time around.

It would be an open question whether or not he could win again under more fair circumstances like he did in 2016, but we’re following the precedent of 2020, so it’s probably safe to assume we’ll get a repeat. The bright side is that from the Jewish standpoint of managing appearances in order to maintain public complacency, the 2024 election is already guaranteed to be an unmitigated disaster.

After 4 years of failing to get rid of Trump on the bogus premise of Russian collusion, then attempting to gaslight the general public that there was a coup attempt on 1/6/2021, which the vast majority of Republicans don’t believe, and then hitting him with 39 bogus felonies, it’s going to be impossible to persuade half of the electorate that this assassination attempt was the work of a lone nutjob.

Logically, if all of the nonsensical legal avenues to prevent Trump from running this year have failed, the next step would be simply to kill him. There’s no escaping this one; it’s the last card left on the table. When the ballots get mailed in to put whoever is the Democrat candidate over, this assassination attempt is going to pose a very big problem.

this BBC interview with a guy outside the security perimeter who claims he saw the shooter before he fired is absolutely wild pic.twitter.com/vJpKZTxSAe

— Warren Sharp (@SharpFootball) July 13, 2024

My opinion is that this was the work of a lone nutjob abetted by the incompetence of Trump’s security team. Apparently, the Secret Service has been gutted by diversity just like everything else in America. Trump didn’t have Ghaddafi’s female bodyguards, but I saw a lot of women around him. The shooter climbed up to the top of a roof with the perfect perch for sniping him which had no security on it, and the Secret Service ignored the crowd trying to alert them a guy had climbed up.

It’s fun to get conspiratorial and point out that if the deep state used a sophisticated drone attack to kill Trump or poisoned him, it would point right back to them, so they needed to use a nutjob to make this look like a random attack. Still, I’m pretty sure the odds are that this shooter was just a nutjob acting on his own. America is packed with them. Remember that guy who set himself on fire outside Trump’s trial in NYC?

Good luck with persuading Republicans, though. They can’t even help themselves by simply admitting in the MSM that this was an assassination attempt. Unfortunately, I had to watch about 10 minutes of this when it happened on CNN, and they wouldn’t even say that Trump was shot. I had to find that part out with my phone. It’s the same playbook that’s been pissing everyone off since he came down that elevator at Trump Tower to announce his candidacy.

My local paper featured a headline this morning from the AP about how Trump was “safe” without mentioning he was even hit by a bullet or that anyone from the crowd had been hit, either. Meanwhile, the photo showed the blood on his face. This was in tandem with yet another article about January 6th. It’s amazing how they simply can’t learn that not only do these tactics not work, but they also achieve the opposite effect by antagonizing people with the surreal dishonesty.

CNN's Jamie Gangel attacks Trump for saying "Fight! Fight! Fight!" after someone tried to murder him.

Literally, she complains about what he did 5 seconds after he was shot

"That's not the message that we want to being sending right now. We want to tamp it down" pic.twitter.com/GHhU2lLI2Z

— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) July 14, 2024

Oh yeah, and then there’s the tanking economy, the insane inflation hitting everyone, and the migration so bad even Democrat mayors are wailing about it. Also, the black crime wave, etc…

There’s no way to spin this assassination attempt that “lowers the temperature” and Trump is way too wily with his base to let this thing go without leveraging it to the max. He started on it as soon as he got hit by pumping his fist. This guy did WWE, remember? The election is only going to get more heated every day.

There’s a strong possibility Trump wins again at the polling stations until the mail-in ballots arrive all at once. Then, the shit would really hit the fan. This time around, we get the inflation not the free money like we did 4 years ago. What a mess. Things just have to go this way.

Trump's just been shot, and CBS anchor Margaret Brennan disparages him for not telling his followers to lower the temperature. Unbelievable. pic.twitter.com/97R2FG97gG

— Tim Graham (@TimJGraham) July 14, 2024

The post Tinkering with the Temperature appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’ve found myself looking after elderly family members recently, which entails the consumption of evening news before supper. I naturally notice things, and spending lots of time outside the United States on business heightens my attenuation to our unique malaise. Even here in America, I’ve never bothered to get a cable package, so mandatory time in front of the mainstream media is really jarring and with the ads being the worst part.

When possible, I’ll grill a meal [pro tip: buy everything and bring it, don’t trust what’s in an elderly person’s fridge] for us outside, so I’m able to escape the news with a beer in their backyard. Last night, it was pouring rain so that route was closed. One thing you never see abroad are the drug commercials, so I guess Americans don’t have perspective on being subjected to these truly dystopian things which couldn’t be made up in a novel about a nightmare country in the future.

Nobody anywhere else steadily consumes long ads where 1/3 is about why you should tell your doctor to prescribe you this drug to relieve your agony and then the next 2/3 are about how you could perish from the horrific side effects while footage plays of contented people thriving in life.

Suicide is frequently mentioned as a side effect in any drug meant to improve your mood, help you sleep, or control some behavior like smoking. To improve your life, you’re rolling the dice on staying alive. I remember these Chantix ads. Of course, there are now multiple class action lawsuits.

This appears to be a part of the product cycle of many prescription drugs, and probably the companies factor them in as a cost of doing business ahead of time, calculating they’ll still come out ahead financially once the bodies are in the ground. Probably, it’s also about speculating about the stock price at particular times rather than the long term profitability of the company anyways.

Smoking seems vastly preferrable to these potentialities. Side effects include throwing yourself into an oncoming train. You could also just not smoke, which comes with no side effect but wanting a cigarette. You’re listening to the narrator talk about fatal bleeding while happy people browse a farmers’ market or play around at a sunny picnic, it’s a startling juxtaposition. Honestly, the ads for class action lawsuits over the drugs advertised in years past do have their comedic value.

Compounding my dismay is that, generally, I’m blissfully unaware of the maladies involved. For instance, prior to the commercial, I had no idea there was a disease so painful that one would consider having all of his teeth removed. Last night was the first time I heard about some sort of condition where extra skin forms in the penis that causes excruciating erections. Whew.

What does this do to people who consume it on a regular basis? If you notice such things, questions about the implications naturally follow. The other thing is that the elderly are the last demographic in America with the attention span to sit through steady rounds of these drug commercials. They’re nearly as lengthy as they are dystopian and it’s just one after the other.

I also ponder how this dynamic will develop in the future. My conclusion is that this will prove a fleeting moment in time because perhaps the Boomers will collect on their retirements, but looking at a demographic chart, even this doesn’t seem so likely over the next 20 years and that’s setting aside all of the budget issues and the long-term viability of the Yankee dollar as the global currency.

Ensuing generations probably won’t be getting scared into what drugs to ask their doctors about because none of us will be able to afford them, let alone retire. Medicine might go back to being far more improvisational, so there won’t be so much money to make off of all these prescription drugs for which nobody will be able to sit through the commercials.

Hey, look at the bright side, perhaps the medical techniques of yesteryear will be better than bleeding to death from a rectal ulcer because you were taking pills to improve the quality of your sleep or hanging yourself in the garage because you wanted to relieve your anxiety and you were led to believe a pharmaceutical company could do the trick.

The post Side Effects Include appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Over the years, I’ve been in a multitude of conversations surrounding the Star Wars franchise. And, in a multitude of those conversations, the topic of favorite characters always seems to come up. People typically agree with my opinions (and trust me, I have a lot of them), but whenever I mention my love for Luke Skywalker, I’m met with mixed reactions. Why? Well, according to some teenage boys from my 12th grade English class, it’s because Luke is boring and doesn’t have the same intrigue/development as characters like Han Solo or Darth Vader. Now, don’t get me wrong, I love those characters too, but Luke is just as brilliant. He’s viewed as a generic protagonist, but his journey is anything but generic.

The best way I can explain my point is through the idea of destiny. When your average, run-of-the-mill hero is faced with destiny, it is usually the idea that they ought to be something more significant in the world than they think. And their facing of said destiny is becoming just that, significant.

But Luke? His destiny is centered around his desire to be a Jedi…a Jedi like his father. In A New Hope, that’s all well and good, because neither the audience nor Luke knew the truth; we just thought Anakin was a hero who was killed by Darth Vader. However, once we learn that Darth Vader and Anakin Skywalker are one in the same (the film’s been out for 41 years, that’s hardly a spoiler anymore), Luke’s destiny is the same as his doom; becoming a Jedi like his father means becoming the same monster that his father became.

When it comes to facing his destiny, Luke is told by both his mentors to, essentially, do his duty as the protagonist and kill the bad guy. In the end, Luke does not win the battle through violence, but through compassion; he does not kill the bad guy, he saves him. Luke never believed that his father was beyond redemption. As a Christian, this is the primary reason why George Lucas’ Star Wars is such an impactful story to me. Luke isn’t generic, he’s a catalyst for hope and redemption, a man anyone can look up to. And, at least to me, he doesn’t feel like a fictional character, he feels human.

It’s heartbreaking to think that a character as beautifully and brilliantly written as Luke has been completely butchered by Disney in recent years. Well, you know what they say: it takes years for an artist to create a masterpiece, but it takes a minute for one idiot with a hammer to destroy it.

Now, if I’ve still not convinced you to view Luke Skywalker in a different light, that’s fine. I’m all for people having a right to their own opinion…but I also have the right to say that your opinion is wrong.

-Miss Sirius Lee
II Thess. 3:17

The post I’m Holding Out for a Hero… Like Luke Skywalker appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Over the years it has been noted, at least in some quarters, how strongly the communist and socialist radicals (but I repeat myself here) in Europe supported the Northern cause during our War of Northern Aggression. Marx, Engels, and all of their leftist ilk literally drooled with their ardent desire for a Northern victory. Marx warmly congratulated Lincoln on his re-election in 1864. It was almost as if there was a Marx-Lincoln Mutual Admiration Society at work.

Bakunin, the Russian revolutionary, as well as other European leftists of various stripes all supported the Northern cause. In fact, they supported Lincoln and the Northern cause just as much as some Southern folks today that have been taught to feel guilty about their Southern heritage. You may know some folks like that. I have.

Leftists that took part in the socialist and communist revolts in Europe in 1848-49 flocked to this country from 1849 through the 1850s as they were run out of their own countries as well as other European countries that did not want left-wing revolutionaries on their soil. Many of these joined the Union army, thousands of them, in fact. There is much documentation for that which has been studiously ignored by our establishment “historians.” Oh, they may mention one or two of these people briefly in articles or books, but they never give you enough information to tell you what they were really all about or why they were over here. Walter Kennedy and I did this in our book Lincoln’s Marxists, recently republished by Shotwell Publishing under the title Lincoln, Marx, and the GOP.

However, putting aside the 19th century leftist radicals and other assorted 19th century pinkos, we might ask if there was any support in Europe for the Confederate Cause. There was, indeed. And, at least in England, that support came from ordinary everyday working people.

Mary Ellison, who has been a lecturer in the Department of American Studies at Keele University, wrote a book called Support for Secession—Lancashire and the American Civil War (University of Chicago Press). In this book she demolished the myths that have persisted for well over a hundred years that, during the War of Northern Aggression, the British working class, and in particular, the Lancashire cotton workers, dutifully supported the Northern cause. In most cases the exact opposite was true. The fact that most working people, at least in Lancashire, supported the Confederate States, has been very carefully muffled. Ellison wrote: “The war was consequently shattering in its impact on the country (Great Britain). The combustible nature of ideological complexities and tough economic repercussions detonated an explosion of sympathy for the Southern cause wherever unemployment was extensive.”

All across Lancashire there were meetings, held mostly by pro-Confederate groups, though pro-Unionists did hold some, but with little success. Ellison continued: “The actual evidence proves that the cotton interests of the country were united in seeking official British assistance for the abortive struggle of the Confederacy for independent life…Demands for pro-Confederate intervention were encased in orderly public meetings and carefully worded petitions that were sent to the government…Simultaneously, the national press overlooked the massive number of spontaneous meetings in support of the South and noted only the organized few that were attended by such noted Northern sympathizers as Cobden and Bright.” Does that sort of media blind spot sound rather familiar in our own day? The gentleman, Richard Cobden, here mentioned, had some interesting reasons for supporting the North. Turns out he was one of the prominent stockholders of the Illinois Central Railroad, and he also had irons in the fire in other Northern companies. So his support for the North was hardly charitable—unless charity begins at home!

When it was issued, the Emancipation Proclamation was viewed by British working people with somewhat less charity than we have been led to believe. Ellison noted: “The Emancipation Proclamation was rejected as nothing more than a military maneuver that hypocritically and ineffectually freed the Southern slaves while leaving those in the North in bondage.” Ellison, noting that British pro-Confederate supporters seemed unable to exert influence on the British government, but noted that this did not mean that pro-Southern support was not there, but that it lacked political clout. It was somewhat akin to our later version of the “silent majority”. Rather our prostitute press made sure they got little notice.

Even English clergymen speaking at meetings recognized that Northern military strategy was really what dictated emancipation measures. Emancipation, contrary to contemporary popular propaganda, was not the humanitarian gesture we have been told it was.

It should be observed that many of the British, while personally opposed to slavery, felt that an independent South would eventually free the slaves, and that slaves would be better off that way than being used as political pawns by the North. One British newspaper editorialized on “the whole Northern attitude that saw Negroes as catspaws and cannon fodder.” That was not too inaccurate an assessment.

One speaker in England maintained that, to save the Union, the North “would rivet the chains of the Negro still faster, and bind the slaves in chains of eternal bondage to gain their purpose.” Almost sounds as if this speaker had read the Corwin Amendment I referred to in a previous article. He was totally correct. That was, and is, the real reason for all the “civil rights” legislation we’ve seen in the years since the War of Northern Aggression. The real name of the game was not emancipation, but rather the transfer of control—from the private ownership of the plantation to the public control and oversight of Washington, D.C. Think about that a little bit.

In conclusion, bear in mind again, that support for the Yankee cause came from European leftists and other assorted anti-Christ types. Support for the Confederate States came from ordinary working people who didn’t have the political clout to get their government’s attention, and who the media mostly ignored. So what has changed in the past 160 years? Not much, more’s the pity!

-By Al Benson Jr.

The post Southern Support: The British Working Class appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Continuing the theme of Them allowing Trump to “win” only to kneecap him in 2025, get rid of him and replace him with a pliable strongman to “save us”…. (see: It Doesn’t Seem As Far Fetched Now).

There may be trouble looming on the horizon for theU.S. stock market, according to BCA Research.

In a note to clients last week, BCA Research chief global strategist Peter Berezin warned that, contrary to popular belief, the economy will fall into a recession either this year or in early 2025.

Should that happen, the S&P 500 could tumble to 3,750, which marks a 30% drop from current levels.

Berezin’s prediction hinges on the belief that the labor market will slow notably in coming months, which will weigh heavily on consumer spending – a major driver of economic growth. The relationship between inflation and unemployment is measured by something called the “Phillips curve.”https://archive.ph/Arv3g

I hadn’t heard of BCA Research, so I looked it up and it is a Canadian firm. Weird, why is Fox Business running some prediction from a Canadian “investment research company”? If you are a suspicious sort like me, it sounds like a prescriptive prognostication, making a “prediction” of something already pre-ordained to happen. Start to get people thinking about an upcoming “deep recession” next year that just happens to coincide with Trump taking office. If they are expecting it, then the timing won’t seem as suspicious.

While it is true that the economy is crap, those with decent portfolios in the market have been doing pretty well. This is a 5-year chart of the S&P 500. July 1st of 2019 the S&P 500 closed at 2980. July 1st, 2024, it closed at 5537. That is close to a 90% return in five years, meaning if your money was in an S&P 500 index fund with low expenses, it has almost doubled in just five years. That is a scorching return.

Source: https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/spx/chartsYou want to see the White Boomers and suburban normies call for Trump’s head, start hitting their 401k plans and IRAs. They won’t give a shit about the fate of their White grandkids if it looks like they won’t have as much wealth to retire on as they were expecting.

Consider this as well. I have pointed out on many occasions that a significant and growing percentage of chiefs of police and prosecutors are either Soros-supported or just generally leftist activists that seem more interested in “equity” than justice, “equity” in this case meaning letting violent black criminals out of jail as fast as they can be processed. It won’t take much to simply dial back the prosecutions even more than They already have, and disheartened cops are less likely to bother arresting people if they just walk right back out of jail.

Add in the antifa being unleashed and maybe a couple of shaky killings of young Miracle-Americans and cities can start burning again.

All of it will be blamed on the Orange Man.

A principle I hold firmly is that if you make things intolerable enough for the average person, they will accept anything to bring some semblance of peace and security back to their lives.

Perhaps I am being paranoid or giving Them too much credit. Maybe not. Either way if you have been paying attention, you can’t put it past them to destroy the country in order to “save” it and rebuild things in Their image. I believe that They would rather rule over ruins than be forced to pretend that peasants like you and I are Their equals.

The post More Ominous Signs For 2025 appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

An individual in the dissident sphere has started a new side project. It is called “Kinism” and you can find it on Telegram here.

He has been putting out some solid information and visuals, so I wanted to share it with you all. Here is a quick snapshot of some of their materials:

They also have a catechism on Kinism here: https://kinism.tiiny.site/.

Do note that all of this is very new. The catechism is even on Version 1.0. I am just sharing it to help them get off the ground—So don’t go into it expecting perfection or an in-depth movement already formed. But the work they have put out thus far in their infancy has been solid, and well worth sharing.

I hope you all find use in it. Cheers.

The post Kinism: A New Movement from an Old Friend appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

It’s hard to think of a more opportune time than the Fourth of July to point out the blindingly obvious. You’ll notice this is not the day where we celebrate a minor functionary in the Sandwich Islands indicting the King of England; nor is it the day on which we celebrate catching Lord North in a minor paperwork error and hauling him before a New York judge. Somehow, a republic was established without the benefit of a wise latinks’ subpoena power.

Ultimately, it came down to raw, naked force, and the willingness of a local elite to roll the dice on controlling their own destiny on a new continent, rather than settling for being a talent reservoir for His Majesty’s intrigues on the old. There were certainly legalistic appeals and justifications, but two hundred and fifty years later, we literally do not care if they were correct. Sorry Jack, pool’s closed.

Judges find this fact unpalatable, because it highlights the extent to which their power derives from social consensus rather than, you know, power. They find themselves in an uncomfortable position where on the one hand they don’t want to be mere administrators of state power, but on the other hand, clearly cannot act in actual opposition to it. So we get histrionics about Justice and Truth and the True Spirit of Aloha instead, as they try to imply they are the mediums by which transcendent pre-political principles reflect themselves upon society, as opposed to mostly providing consistent rules for resolving minor civil disputes so everyone can get on with their lives.

The Sotomayor dissents to the big “political” cases this Supreme Court term are funny, legitimately humorous, because they take this bait so hard one is concerned that her diabeetus is subjecting her to some sort of metabolic disorder. Did you know that, according to the majority’s logic, if the President discovered the ancient Eye of Horus encased in the Capitol Crypt and summoned a powerful Egyptian demon to sacrifice the population of DC in a ritual ascending him to a God-King – he might not be able to be prosecuted? Even though you shouldn’t do that? And converting the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool to drainage for a blood drenched altar is arguably in violation of the National Parks Service regulations on event permitting (although with Chevron deference also overturned, who knows)? This is very dangerous to Our Democracy!

Under the circumstances, one might suspect one has bigger things to worry about, or that more drastic measures might need to be taken, than… convening a Grand Jury. The risk you undertake in an attempted coup is that you are shot, during or after, not that you may be prosecuted for, inter alia, gazing upon Forbidden Documents. Conversely, if any official with prosecutorial power (literally tens of thousands of people, by the way) can contrive an argument that you trying to get elected is a crime, the obvious equilibrium is for you to make their arguments irrelevant. What is the penalty for losing an election, and what is the penalty for not having one?

For all their talk of Our Democracy, libs are aghast at the idea that voters might actually get to choose the Orange Beast, again, against the wishes of a guy who has literally never been voted on by anyone for anything – but as much as they would like to, they cannot simply say “we are declaring a state of exception to rid ourselves of a tyrant”. If libs engaged with this logic, they would be on a slippery slope to endorsing the American Revolution, the Second Amendment, or even America itself – horrors in their mind greater even than Trump.

The post Muh Executive Immunity appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

A significant percentage of the men born the same year as Joe Biden are already dead. Unfortunately, going senile is something that often happens to those who reach the age of 81. It’s not implausible that a man of this age would be having cognitive problems. In fact, it’s quite possible.

However, if this man was President Biden, who spent years speaking incoherently and walking around confused on national television, his cognitive decline was a conspiracy theory until last week. His deteriorating condition was obvious to any observer, but this may have led to you being dismissed as a conspiracy theorist for commenting on the subject.

Now that everyone suddenly acknowledges that he’s senile, be pleased to discover that you’re no more credible with anyone who dismissed you as a conspiracy theorist for pointing out this obvious thing than you were before. What was fiction is now fact, and that’s all there is to it.

Biden tells a Philadelphia radio station that he's "proud" to be "the first black woman to serve with a black president" pic.twitter.com/kP5J7Q9lYy

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 4, 2024

How many of your friends or family characterized you as idiotic or insane for refusing the COVID injections? Now that they’ve been totally discredited, are you any less of a nutjob in their estimation? I’m certainly not. It was completely obvious that what was, at worst, the flu and was not a justification for mandating experimental genetic injections, for which no valid data existed to prove they were even safe. Nobody talks about it anymore.

Likewise, nobody talks about Iraq or Afghanistan but was then assured the Russians would lose to the Ukrainians in a lopsided fashion that was comical in its severity while their economy collapsed. Now that this hasn’t happened, and clearly won’t happen, everyone who predicted this from the start is still on the fringe while the people who turned out to be dead wrong are still providing their commentary on mainstream platforms while their consumers are undeterred by them getting things consistently incorrect.

One is tempted to assume that the combination of making a correct evaluation of a situation, while providing evidence and a rationale for this evaluation, would make you credible with anybody once the reality of the situation is acknowledged to match what you explained to them. Unfortunately, it’s only with certain people who are also likely to be dismissed as extremists, idiots, or lunatics like yourself.

Pointing out that you made a correct prediction based on facts is just going to piss off anyone who believed the lie. The anger is going to be directed at you and not themselves for getting conned. Has anyone who banned you from something for refusing the vaccination apologized?

The Biden senility saga comes as no surprise in light of the fact that the average person can be conned into having themselves injected with poison. COVID functioned as an unsettling proof of just how gullible they can be, so the Biden stuff is some fun political baseball to distract ourselves from the civilizational nightmare we’re living in.

There are still plenty of people to reach with the truth, which always makes the production of content in the dissident sphere worthwhile. The question is if enough of these people exist to affect some sort of civilizational U-Turn. We keep getting these reminders to not get our hopes up, so maybe all you’ll have is your personal satisfaction at being correct as the world burns around you.

ABC reporter George Stephanopoulos asked President Joe Biden, "Can you serve effectively for the next four years?"

Biden replied: "George, I'm the guy that put NATO together… I'm the guy that shut Putin down. No one thought could happen."

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/kOfMajrk6q

— AF Post (@AFpost) July 6, 2024

Actually, everyone thought it was happening but then it didn’t happen. The post From Fiction to Fact appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

We wish most of you well. We need not be enemies. The race of Christendom – Europeans – the White race – spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ to every corner of this world. For this, we are proud and unapologetic.

The Jew, the enemy of Jesus Christ, remains His enemy, our enemy, and the enemy of all races. (1 Thessalonians 2:14-16)

We seek to live in peace, separately. Why? Because we are not you, and you are not us.

We find no Christian need to welcome your language, morals, religion, nor race. Nor should you feel the need to adopt our God, language, customs, or nation. We have noticed, in fact, that many do not, even when welcomed into our nations. So, we return the sentiment, and the actions. Our reasonable accommodation is to respect our differences, go peacefully our separate ways, and build our own societies for the benefit of our children, the honor of our ancestors, and in obedience to our God.

The White and Christian race finds no reason to justify this stance any more than justifying the exclusiveness of marriage, the beneficial influence of fences between neighbors, nor the inviolability of a home to a man and his wife and their own children; no one outside of that family has any right to live with them nor should they arrogantly expect to be welcomed.

Our national borders must be as sacred as our marriage vows, our fences and our homes. We have noticed the hatred of the Jew and the black and Muslim toward the White race and decide that it is against our God, our ancestors, and our offspring to have patience with it any longer. We owe no race our own destruction, nor will we not allow our children to be taught to hate their ancestors. This is a violation of the Fifth Commandment and, in fact, is worthy of death. We owe our ancestors, descendants, and our God a vibrant and separate Christian race unaccommodating to those who have sought our annihilation.

We support homogenous ethno-states – for all ethnos – because this is the order laid out in the story of Genesis chapters 10 and 11. Rebuilding Babel is an affront to our God. We support homogenous ethno-states the same way we support exclusiveness in marriage and the sanctity of a man’s home; we utterly disdain to waiver on any of these – there is no reason to even contemplate it.

We will not tolerate living cheek by jowl with peoples, starting with the Jews, who hate us, accuse us, and attempt to saddle us with false-guilt and self-loathing. We utterly reject this evil. Should non-Whites living in White lands hold fast to their hatred, they will be expelled for our mutual benefit; after all, why would they want to live with a people they consider evil?

The White race, and its unique component nations, are beautiful, intelligent, wise, and are the historical and racial repository of the Christian faith. The Jew, in his own words, seeks our destruction. We do not apologize to men for our ancestors’ misdeeds.

We apologize to our God, Jesus Christ, for seeking accommodation and compromise with peoples who are not us, who hate us, and who worship not our God.

We are not moved by charges of “racism,” or “xenophobia,” or “antisemitism,” nor any such false moralities (sexist, homophobic, queer phobic) that have been invented to manipulate our White and Christian race. The use of these words is as odious as any racial epithet that you imagine insults your own people. We are done with that.

We reject all calls for reparations, apologies, equality, equity, or any measure that seeks to impose a burden upon our race that the Almighty has not placed upon us. Our obligation is to Christ, our ancestors, and our children. Our duty is to preach the truth of Jesus Christ and to create Christian nations – this IS the Great Commission.

We utterly reject moral codes foreign to the Christian Holy Scriptures.

We do not respect Allah, Buddha, the Talmud, Krishna, Baal, Lucifer or the modern secular atheism that has taken over a Christian people and Christian lands. We will not allow Temples, Synagogues, or Mosques nor will we subsidize atheism in our halls of learning.

Calls for “tolerance” have been used exclusively to tear down the moral and philosophical fabric of our Christian nation and the vitality of our European and Christian race. We have no tolerance for our own destruction nor those who pursue that end.

The First Commandment governs our nation, and this points exclusively to Jesus Christ as the Lord, Lawgiver and Judge of all of mankind. This law shall be upon our walls, our courts, our schools and our homes.

We are not moved by accusations of “intolerance” nor “divisiveness.” The Almighty is intolerant of Biblical evil, and quite divisive considering the destruction of a place called Babel which forced all peoples to centralize under one ruler and in one place.

Slogans such as “No nations, no borders,” and “one race – the human race,” we find odious. Hypocrites have been applied these lies to Christendom while the Jew demands his ethno-state and the black genocides our racial brethren in South Africa.

We do not litigate our position. Our ancestors sinned by rejecting Christ our King for the putrid “tolerance” of the Jew and their allies; we right this wrong by building explicitly Christian nations.

We will return our nation to Jesus Christ. It is worth the fight. Non-White races that can live respectfully with the White and Christian nation – without making demands – are not our concern. We owe you nothing. Be good guests or leave. You have our respect only if you earn it.

The Jews are Satan’s children, the enemy of all mankind, the hands and feet of the devil. Jews inspire racial animus towards the White race and hatred toward Jesus Christ. We apologize to our God for thinking better of the Jew than Jesus Christ did (John 8:44, Rev 3:9, Rev 2:9). Their destiny is Luke 19:27 and Christian peoples exalt the Judgement of Christ, as the issue has already been decided.

Our goal is not to be friends with the world. White and Christian lands have no King but Christ. Our obligation is to our ancestors, our descendants, and our God. The time for accommodation is over.

-By Fritz Berggren, PhD

The post What Shall Happen? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Yeah, yeah, yeah, supposedly the “far right” or even just “right-wing” parties have been winning in Europe. France, Germany, et al. We’ve all seen the news.

Americans and Europeans alike like to pretend that European political parties are different from ours because they have more of them, but their system is no different from ours. It is the same uniparty nonsense that exists here.

There is no left or a true Right within the traditional political party system. It’s not viable for them to exist there. If they did, they would get banned. Like Germany is likely to do with AfD if they step out of line.

Every once in a while, the elites excite the population by letting a more fringe element of the same uniparty get a few extra seats. It’s a tactic to dull the masses. Let off some steam, if you will.

The process by fringe politicians of the uniparty is literally the same song and dance every single time. Just start watching out for it:

• Step 1: Loudly proclaim the fringe belief.
• Step 2: Quietly proclaim the fringe belief.
• Step 3: Argue that you can’t actually do the fringe belief.
• Step 4: Quietly endorse the opposite of the fringe belief.
• Step 5: Openly proclaim the mainstream narrative / condemn the fringe belief.

Just look at Trump and his immigration discourse over time:

• Step 1 (pre-election): We’re going to ban immigration!! Moratorium until we can figure this all out! Send all illegals back!
• Step 2 (immediately post-election): We’re totally fine with LEGAL immigration, just not illegal immigration, okay? But we have to do everything LEGALLY.
• Step 3 (midway into term): We can’t actually deport or stop people at the border, but we’re going to slow down the illegals a little bit. Maybe put up a few bricks here and there.
• Step 4 (toward the end of term): We love all immigrants. They built America. Please vote for me, all you brown people.
• Step 5 (now): Stamp a green-card to every college diploma for all the illegals that are graduating from our colleges at our own tax expense!!!!!….unless they don’t like Israel, of course.

The exact same thing happened with Giorgia Meloni. She is now also actively calling for more immigrants, after being elected solely on her stance of zero immigrants.

You could take this above template and apply it to any political position of a so-called “far right” political party.

Every politician has imaginary balls and testosterone pre-election, but gets neutered during their term, and then is lacking so many hormones for so long by post-term that they are practically a sissified leftist eunuch.

It’s just the way it goes.

Every single “far right” political party follows that same process:

• Campaign For Years As Underdog -> Finally Win -> Immediately Cave On All Useful Positions.

They might actually keep some of their old positions, but only the ones that are truly insignificant in the eyes of the uniparty. Anything that would actually help us overcome this system is quickly and quietly abandoned.

Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen, and all of these other uniparty stooges will do the same thing. Our people will spearhead them to the top so they can just lie to your face.

None of these fools is going to change Europe, just like Trump is not going to change anything here. We need people outside of the political parties for real change. Our actions in the system can only prolong the inevitable; never accomplish victory.

The true “far right” wants a new, better system; We are not interested in happily operating to our own advantage within the existing one. None of these parties are fighting for that, because they all benefit tremendously from the current system. Until strong men step outside of these bounds, we will forever be dealing with neutered uniparty stooges.

It’s not blackpilled to recognize this reality. It’s just the way it works. We can still win, but it won’t be through this kind of victory.

I don’t know how many times it has to be said, but we’re not going to win this thing by voting. Those of you hoping for that electoral victory are going to be forever disappointed.

EDIT: I was found right, already. I first drafted this article a week ago, and Marine Le Pen is already bending the knee before my publishing date for this piece even hit:

In break with its past, French far-right now supports Israel

In a break with its past, and with fresh legislative elections set for this weekend, France’s far right is now supporting Israel rather than being critical of it.

After being anti-Israel in its early years, the far-right party National Rally (RN), now under Marine Le Pen, who took the party helm in 2011, has changed its position radically.

The party won more than 30% of the vote in the June 9 European Parliament elections, a blow that led French President Emmanuel Macron to acknowledge his centrist bloc’s defeat, dissolve parliament, and announce snap elections, set to begin on Sunday and conclude a week later.

The announcement jolted France across the political spectrum.

The Israeli offensive on Gaza, which has claimed over 37,000 lives since last October, and the recognition of Palestinian statehood were among the top issues for the parties in this context.

Since its founding in 1972, the National Rally has been accused of using antisemitic language, and Marine Le Pen’s father, the party’s founding leader Jean-Marie Le Pen, was known for his criticism of Israeli attacks on Palestinians.

The elder politician went so far as to describe the Gaza Strip as a “concentration camp where people are deprived the chance to defend themselves” – an assessment many modern critics of Israel would tend to agree with.

In contrast, however, Marine Le Pen, argues that the National Rally has been in favor of the creation of a Jewish state throughout its history, calling it a longtime Zionist party.

Uniparty, uniparty, uniparty. A complete uniparty flip in a matter of days.

Just watch the process:

• Campaign For Years As Underdog -> Finally Win -> Instantly Become Zionists

Congrats, French right-wingers. Your so-called “far right” political party in France was just re-defined as a “longtime Zionist party”.

Unbelievable. You really cannot make this **** up.

The post No, the “Far Right” Is Not Winning in European Elections appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Upon the agreement of the Young Dixie Executive Board, we have decided to put forward publicly an aggressive platform to defeat feminism in a Free South. The platform below is a work in progress, as we seek feedback from our fellow Southerners.

1. Young Dixie seeks a criminal ban on OnlyFans and the seizure of all its assets by a proposed Confederate government. In this measure, we hope to end a parasitic cycle of degeneracy. Women are falsely “empowered” at the sake of forfeiting their ladyhood and dignity. We see this as fundamentally un-Southern and, therefore, should not be tolerated.
2. Young Dixie seeks a total ban on abortion initiated on a state-by-state level. We have an ardent Christian and cultural opposition to the practice. It is inherently a rejection of motherhood, responsibility, and family.
3. Young Dixie seeks a ban on “no fault” divorces, finding them to be a tool of feminism and designed to break down and destroy marriages.
4. Young Dixie seeks a 31-day “cooling off” period for divorces. This law would allow either party to withdraw a divorce application within 31 days of the marriage registration authority receiving it, and if one party does, the application becomes invalid, and a new cooling-off period begins. To finalize a divorce, couples must obtain a divorce certificate after the cooling-off period ends.
5. Young Dixie seeks a total end to alimony, as it is nothing more than legalized theft and violates a man’s honor and rights.
6. Young Dixie seeks to raise the voting age for women to 21 years of age, possibly even increased to 29. It should be said, a significant reason for lowering the voting age (in 1971) was that men could be drafted at 18, yet not vote. However, this doesn’t apply to women as they cannot, nor should they be, drafted. Young women are also more easily influenced and need more time to mature with respect to voting and political ramifications.
7. Young Dixie seeks a ban on birth control pills and other associated birth control measures. In this, we seek to reinstate responsibility and consequences to sexual intercourse and decrease sexual promiscuity. Young Dixie seeks to wipe clean the hyper-hedonist culture of the American Empire and part of that is decreasing fornication and the rampant “hook up” culture of the modern day. In a Free South, birth control pills and other such medications will be proscribed and considered as illegal contraband.
8. Infanticide (abortion) will be considered as a capital punishment offence in a Free South. The mother, as well as, any willing accomplice to the act, including the father, medical professionals, and infanticide activists, will be subjected to this judgement. Abortion is murder and should be treated accordingly.
9. Young Dixie seeks to expand the description and definition, including prosecution, of prostitution to include women engaged in commercial pornographic content and thus liable to criminal punishment for prostitution.
10. Young Dixie seeks a Southern-wide ban on gender (and racial) based affirmative action schemes in colleges and in the workplace.

– By Young Dixie

The post Young Dixie’s Proposals to Combat Feminism in a Free South appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

It has been said that those of us who disagree with, and challenge, the accepted narrative of “The Civil War” and Abraham Lincoln are “rewriting history.” The truth is, we are trying to correct history by presenting the side never told. As the saying goes, “there are two sides to every story,” but why is it that the Yankee rewritten version of “history” is all we ever see or hear? When trying to present the truths missing from the history books, we often hear, “You lost the war. Get over it.” That is quite a shallow and narrow-minded attitude to take. What are the ones who support the accepted narrative trying to hide? Why do they want to shut us up? Liars fear truth. The truth can stand on its own merits. Lies fall apart. Let us examine some of these “accepted narratives” we have had pummeled into our heads for over 160 years.

The Civil War was fought to “free the slaves”That has a humanitarian theme, and sounds like a good thing, but it is entirely false. No Union soldier fired one shot to “free the slaves,” and no Confederate soldier fired one shot “to protect slavery.” There were slave states in the Union after the South seceded, and they held over 429,000 slaves (1860 Census). During the war, West Virginia (which was unconstitutionally formed) was admitted into the Union as a slave state. Lincoln countermanded General Fremont’s orders and had emancipated slaves returned to their masters in Missouri. After reading these facts, the “fought to free the slaves” argument just doesn’t pass the smell test. Also, Lincoln supported the Corwin Amendment which would have forever made it illegal to abolish slavery, if the seceded states would return to the Union and ratify it. Lincoln, himself, said the war was not being waged over slavery. There were Union officers (Grant, Sherman, and others) who owned slaves, but they were “fighting to free the slaves”? Let’s look at a couple of quotes. There are many more, but for the sake of time and space we will look at only these two.

“We didn’t go into the war to put down slavery, but to put the flag back; and to act differently at this moment would, I have no doubt, not only weaken our cause, but smack of bad faith…”

Abraham Lincoln

“Sir”, said Grant, “I have no doubt in the world that the sole object is the restoration of the Union. I will say further, though, that I am a Democrat — every man in my regiment is a Democrat — and whenever I shall be convinced that this war has for its object anything else than what I have mentioned, or that the Government designs using its soldiers to execute the purposes of the abolitionists, I pledge you my honor as a man and a soldier that I will not only resign my commission, but will carry my sword to the other side, and cast my lot with that people.”

Democratic Speaker’s Handbook, p. 33 (1868)

The South wanted to protect and perpetuate slavery to the western territoriesWell, that myth is beyond absurd. Common sense refutes this myth. By the very act of seceding from the Union and establishing its own country, the South locked itself OUT of any rights to territories belonging to the U.S. The Confederate Constitution outlawed the importation of slaves, so if it wanted to “protect and perpetuate” slavery, why did it outlaw the importation of slaves? Slavery was dying out in the South and there were five times as many abolition groups in the South as there were in the North. The South wanted to be done with slavery and many had already freed their slaves. If the South wanted to “protect slavery,” it had only to stay in the Union where it was already protected. The South was working towards gradual emancipation so that the blacks could gradually be prepared to enter society as free people. The ending of slavery in the South was a byproduct of the war, not the cause for it.

Secession was treasonSecession being legal was taught at West Point from William Rawle’s “Views on the Constitution” published in 1825. It was used as a textbook for one year and remains in the library today. Americans who oppose secession for the Southern states find themselves bed partners with the communist generals of Yugoslavia and communist hard-liners of the former Soviet Union. What was condemned in 1861 was sanctioned by the Republican Party in 1991 when Vaclav Havel of Czechoslovakia withdrew his country from the Soviet Union’s orbit, but Jefferson Davis and his fellow Southerners are called traitors for doing the same thing.

The 10th Amendment protects a states’ right to withdraw from the Union. If a state voluntarily joined, it can voluntarily withdraw.

New England threatened to secede over the War of 1812, yet no force was threatened against them to remain in the Union. Our Founding Fathers knew secession was a right held by the states.

Among the Founding Fathers there was no doubt. The United States had just seceded from the British Empire, exercising the right of the people to “alter or abolish” – by force, if necessary – a despotic government. The Declaration of Independence is the most famous act of secession in our history, though modern rhetoric makes “secession” sound somehow different from, and more sinister than, claiming independence.

The original 13 states formed a “Confederation,” under which each state retained its “sovereignty, freedom, and independence.” The Constitution didn’t change this; each sovereign state was free to reject the Constitution. The new powers of the federal government were “granted” and “delegated” by the states, which implies that the states were prior and superior to the federal government.”

After Lincoln’s illegal War of Northern Aggression, Jefferson Davis, the President of the Confederacy, was arrested and placed in prison prior to a trial. The trial was never held, because the chief justice of the Supreme Court, Mr. Salmon Portland Chase, informed President Andrew Johnson that if Davis were placed on trial for treason the United States would lose the case because nothing in the Constitution forbids secession. That is why no trial of Jefferson Davis was held, despite the fact that he wanted one!

Because of our progressive-liberal public education system, many Americans now believe the myth that secession is treasonable. The Declaration of Independence was, in fact, a declaration of secession. Its final paragraph declares inarguably the ultimate sovereignty of each state:

That these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved of all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do.

Following the Declaration of Independence, each colony established by law the legitimacy of its own sovereignty as a state. Each one drew up, voted upon, and then ratified its own state constitution, which declared and defined its sovereignty as a state. Realizing that they could not survive upon the world stage as thirteen individual sovereign nations, the states then joined together formally into a confederation of states, but only for the purposes of negotiating treaties, waging war, and regulating foreign commerce.

If secession was not legal, why did Northern Congressional Representatives Florence (PA), Sickles (NY), and Ferry (CT) propose constitutional amendments to prohibit secession?

The Emancipation Proclamation freed the slavesYou say, “His Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves! That proves he was against slavery.” Lincoln’s words: “I view the matter (Emancipation Proclamation) as a practical war measure, to be decided upon according to the advantages or disadvantages it may offer to the suppression of the rebellion.” He also wrote: “I will also concede that emancipation would help us in Europe, and convince them that we are incited by something more than ambition.” At the time Lincoln wrote the proclamation, war was going badly for the Union. London and Paris were considering recognizing the Confederacy and considering assisting it in its war effort.

All one has to do to debunk this myth is to actually read the Proclamation. It “freed” slaves in areas NOT under federal control, but expressly left them in bondage where it actually could have freed them.

At least 200,000 Union soldiers deserted after Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation came out, 120,000 evaded conscription, and over 90,000 Northern men fled to Canada to avoid conscription, and thousands more hid in the Pennsylvania mountains to hide from enrollment officers. That seems to have been left out of the history books.

We have not even discussed the fact that Lincoln invaded over Southern tariffs, not slavery. The South was paying 85% of the federal revenues, which was unconstitutional. Also, it was the New England Yankees working the slave trade, on ships built by slaves, flying Old Glory, that transported the slaves into the U.S., Caribbean, and South America. But it is the South that gets all the blame for slavery.

This only scratches the surface of the truth. Several other issues look different when you hear “the rest of the story,” as Paul Harvey used to say. There are countless accounts of the Yankee atrocities visited upon Southern civilians, black and white. Lincoln’s army murdered, raped, looted, and burned its way across the South, and when Sherman would tell Lincoln of the atrocities committed by the army, Lincoln would laugh and tell him to repeat it over again. What has been taught in our public school system about Lincoln is nothing but fabricated myths.

Over 160 years of rewritten “history” has brainwashed generations of Americans, just as it was intended to do. But the truth cannot be buried forever, and many of us know the truth and are putting it out there. We do not have the communist media, Hollywood, and politicians to back us with the truth like they back the fabricated rewritten version of history. In this age of information being literally at our fingertips, there is no excuse for anyone to not know the truth. Since we cannot depend on academia, the media, or Hollywood to tell us the truth, it is up to each one to learn it on their own. I will close with a short list of very good books that will help anyone seeking the truth.

• The Real Lincoln, by Charles L.C. Minor
• The South Was Right, by James Ronald Kennedy and Walter Donald Kennedy
• Red Republicans and Lincoln’s Marxists, by Walter D. Kennedy and Al Benson, Jr.
• The Un-Civil War, by Leonard M. Scruggs
• Truths of History,by Mildred Lewis Rutherford (1920)
• Complicity, by Anne Farrow, Joel Lang, and Jenifer Frank
• Facts and Falsehoods Concerning the War on the South 1861-1865, by George Edmunds
• Slavery Was Not the Cause of the War Between the States: The Irrefutable Argument, by Gene Kizer, Jr.
• Causes Of The Civil War, by Philip Leigh
• Southern Reconstruction, by Philip Leigh
• The South Under Siege 1830 – 2000, by Frank Conner

God Bless Dixie!

Jeff Paulk
Oklahoma Division Commander
Sons of Confederate Veterans

The post Correcting History appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, written by L. Frank Baum, a disheartened little girl from Kansas is wistfully taken to the utopian world she has always dreamt of. Unexpectedly, a catastrophic whirlwind hurls her into a land of delightful people, magically enchanted fellow travelers, horrible and beautiful witches, all in brilliant technicolor. But once there, all she ever wants is to return to her mundane, black-and-white way of life, back to normalcy, back to “home sweet home.” And there is only one person who can get her back, a very powerful and wonderful wizard, the wonderful Wizard of Oz!

But, there’s a catch. There’s always a catch.

After gaining great fame in Oz by crushing a wicked witch under her deplorable, old home, she and her hopeful friends press forward, happily singing and dancing along a yellow brick road. Along the way, they survive many attacks by evil forces, making it all the way to the Emerald City, where the great and powerful Oz rules in benevolence. With great expectation, the wizard will grant her humble wish, she enters the great hall. And though she pleads her case, the Oz requires more. For though he is powerful, he still lacks the one token that will make the little girl’s dream come true. He needs just a little more, and with great drama and self-aggrandizing flare, he asks Dorothy to slay another wicked witch, and bring evidence the nasty deed has
been done.

Every election cycle, Southerners are asked to give a little bit more, vote a little harder, vote for the right candidate, the one that will make America great again, or some other nonsense. In 2016, there was great hope, as the Wizard of the Deal, Donald J. Trump, descended down the golden promise escalator in Manhattan, New York. He astonished the citizens of Oz with all his magnificent and magical words. And through happenstance, he arrived in the Emerald City victorious in his magical hot air balloon.

All of Oz was astounded! There was shouting for joy alongside weeping and gnashing of teeth. Those that greeted his arrival with joy soon found the previous regime was not going to let him rule in peace. Those that still wanted the wicked witch to rule immediately began to undermine the not-so-powerful Oz. Instead of giving those that loved him what they wanted, he wasted his time trying to gain the affection of those that despised him. In the end, his rule was filled with fire balls of flash and loud speeches. It turned out, he was not a wonderful wizard, but just another politician hiding behind the curtain of empty promises.

Brothers and sisters, we have followed that yellow brick road; we have done all that the wizards of the American Empire have asked us to do… and still it is not enough. Just as Dorothy learned after all the hardships she and her fellow travelers faced, there is no place like home, and no wizard, no matter how great and powerful, can get you what you desire most. The brains, the heart, and the courage have always been within you. Our return to a wholesome and familial South is only a click of the heels away, if you’re willing to believe.

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post The Wonderful Wizard of the Deal appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Various European/White nationalist groups will often find many diverse people fighting against our beliefs.

But it is not so much that these groups dislike nationalism (or identitarianism/kinism/whatever you want to call it); it is just they don’t like our group having it.

They simply don’t like the “White nation in their own land” version of nationalism.

Nonwhites are perfectly fine supporting nationalism when it is to the betterment of their own group or people.

For instance:

Zionist Jews are the most obvious example here. But this logic can and should be extended even past the Zionists. It is the same logic used by American blacks and other ethnic groups. In France, for instance, the same argument is often used by the Arabs regarding Islamic nationalism.

We often pretend that these groups are fighting against nationalism. But it is quite the opposite: By fighting against various White nationalists, the ethnics are fighting for their own version of in-group nationalism. They sure aren’t fighting for the leftist-white “diversity utopia” lie.

Because these various ethnic groups exist as a parasite on us, they do not want Whites to form a bloc to remove them from their leeching activity. By working together as an ethnic bloc(s), they keep their group in a stronger position. They know that if Whites made our group preferences a priority, it would therefore reduce their ability to thrive at our expense.

This strategy is simply nationalism by different means. Instead of having a strong nation in their own land as we Whites typically envision ‘nationalism’, they instead want a strong nation in our land where we provide for them at our own expense. On top of this, they also get their own countries filled with their own people somewhere else, just in case things don’t work out well over here.

I’d still call that nationalism, just an inferior and vile version of it.

By fighting White nationalism, the various ethnics, Zionists, and hordes of illegal migrants are far better off. Especially as a collective group (or one could say: Nation). But this version of nationalism happens at our expense.

The harder these groups fight against White nationalism, the harder they fight FOR [insert their ethnicity here] nationalism.

Hilariously, the reality is that all of these anti-nationalist groups love nationalism. They just don’t love White nationalism.

The post Everyone Loves Nationalism…Just Not Our Version of It appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Modern conflicts involving the USA are propelled by the ambitions of Jews. If you’re trying to assess why these things occur, never conflate evil and aggression with reason and courage or any moral authority whatsoever. If one does, there’s no way to predict that these events are going to happen.

One couldn’t predict the Global War on Terrorism on the logical premise that it was possible or necessary to fight a war against a strategic concept, which was actually pioneered by Jews to drive the Arabs out of Palestine. It was possible, however, if you read what the Jews who were planning it were writing, and you were willing to acknowledge that they were in the driver’s seat.

It served no interest of the American people to overthrow the government of Ukraine and foment a civil war to trap the Russians in a quagmire, while sanctions caused their economy to collapse so the Federation could descend into chaos and be broken up into separate entities under Zionist control. This wasn’t even a feasible project, so it couldn’t have been predicted from that angle, either.

Likewise, Putin had determined that a protracted conflict wouldn’t serve Russia’s best interests and signed on the dotted line for compromises to end the civil war twice, and once to end his intervention at its outset. It’s only the Jews that provide a decisive explanation for any of this horror. It continues purely to serve their interests and those of no one else.

We’re now facing an escalation in Lebanon by Netanyahu. The entire state of Israel is predicated on the notion that its residents will be mostly safe and comfortable while they eventually get rid of all the Arabs. Pretty much any Jew in Israel can obtain another passport if they don’t already have one. If Hezbollah and Iran take out critical infrastructure in retaliation, as they’ve promised to do, that’s it for the state of Israel. Jews flee after their gambits fail; this is an established playbook.

These aren’t courageous people. The fastest growing segment of the population which serves as Netanyahu’s critical voting block refuses to even serve in the military because they claim that praying to their demon is a valid alternative contribution to Israel’s security. It’s literally that crazy. The gay pride parade Jews are the ones stuck doing the combat, and that’s been going rather poorly for them. Israel isn’t a country with the will or demographic potential to fight the conflicts it started.

Like I said, one can’t use reason to predict why these things are happening. The Jews spent generations brainwashing the Western public about how they’re the most aggrieved victims because a fake genocide was done to them, so they can’t be criticized instead of the fact that they have power, which is actually why they can’t be criticized.

They’ve done more to squander this hideous advantage in the past year than all the years since 1945. It’s not possible to claim successfully that you can’t do anything wrong because you were the victims of a fake genocide while you do a real genocide for the entire world to watch in anger. Objectively, this ploy is truly insane, but their power comes through deceit and corruption, so it’s fundamentally unsustainable.

Everything has to unravel on the Jews and go spectacularly wrong. These people simply can’t help themselves, reform their behavior, or even moderate it. As Christ warned, they’re the children of the devil and they murdered Him. It can’t go any other way but wrong for them. Their path leads to the fires of hell, so any win they score along the way is only temporary. The bad part is that we’re getting sucked in and dragged along with these problems they inexorably create for themselves rather than living as decent human beings.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met yesterday with fighters and commanders from the 55th Brigade, participating in a brigade-level exercise in the Galilee, as part of a series of exercises carried out by IDF brigades to boost fitness and evaluate plans for an attack in Lebanon. pic.twitter.com/VqDfbwyhqg

— Prime Minister of Israel (@IsraeliPM) June 26, 2024

There’s not going to be any process of reform that involves the Jews. Only disasters, of which we careen from one to the next. Thus, concluding they won’t invade Lebanon because they didn’t even have what it takes to defeat Hamas in the tiny Gaza Strip, which they’ve admitted, or that the consequence of this gamble not paying off are existential, is misguided. We’re discussing the Jews, not rational actors.

Clearly, Netanyahu and his Jewish faction have assumed that they’ll be able to take the territory they want in Lebanon up to the Litani River while the U.S. military flattens the country from above, while simultaneously taking on Iran and deterring Russian intervention. The conflict and fait accompli will secure their hold on political power. These are very bad ideas.

The Russians have put up with incredible provocations on their own soil to avoid escalating into a third world war, so perhaps it’s reasonable to assume that whatever happens in Lebanon isn’t enough for them to strike the U.S. military, either. Still, Iran and Hezbollah have promised to fight and demonstrated their capabilities to defeat the Israeli military and take out the infrastructure that enables daily life in Israel.

If the Israelis do invade, this would be terrible for us because the entire capabilities of the U.S. military will be put on the line in the service of the Jews who would be losing against Hezbollah, Iran, and all of its proxies. There’s no way they’re going to let Israel get wrecked without Americans and Europeans doing everything in their power to stop it. The Biden Administration is warning that they’ll back Israel 100% while pleading with them not to do it.

Nothing can be explained by what’s in our interests. It’s absolutely intolerable that America is held hostage by the Jews. I’m not really much of a prepper, but it does seem like a great idea these days.

The axis doesn’t threaten only us. It threatens you. It's on the march to conquer the Middle East. Conquer the Middle East. Conquer. That means, actually, conquer. Conquer Saudi Arabia, conquer the Arabian Peninsula. It's just a question of time. pic.twitter.com/DSjtJGB082

— Prime Minister of Israel (@IsraeliPM) June 27, 2024

The post Invading Lebanon appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One-on-one debates like Thursday’s are exclusively about tail risk. The eight-way cage matches of the primaries can at least plausibly claim to be about “introducing your candidate” to the viewing public, with the implication that you might as well swing for the fences to be noticed. Trump did this masterfully in the 2016 primary debates, where he began by pounding his biggest would-be competitor into a pulp before dismantling the rest of the field. But once it’s mano-a-mano and you’re guaranteed roughy equal facetime, it’s mostly about risk mitigation.

Add to this that politicians are naturally risk-adverse, and not trained in the kind of instantaneous verbal sparring you need in order to push the envelope, and you have a recipe for a boring encounter. We remember “bits” from previous debates mostly because of their rarity, and often only when they are subsequently satirized.

So the only interesting question ends up being if anything interesting is going to happen – specifically, anything ruinous. Trump, being an experienced television personality with decades of extemporaneous speaking chops, was unlikely ex ante to make a fool of himself, although the risk was always that he would allow himself to be taken advantage of by the bizarre moderation setup and his ideological opponents’ control of moderation.

Biden, by contrast, was expected to be in a race between the elasticity of his battered cerebral blood vessels and the adrenochrome/vitamin cocktail flooding through his system. Until you’ve hung out with some fairly substantial people, you have no idea the sheer quality of high-end medical care available or precisely what you can deliver for a 90 minute tune-up, if you don’t have to do it night after night, and don’t mind knocking off a few months of life expectency in the worst case. Even four years of straight-up speedballs is totally tolerable if you really need to steady your nerves to do your best work – just ask Jerry Garcia. On the other hand, Jerry wasn’t 81 with multiple brain aneurysms under his belt already.

So there was a reason CNN insistend on a full two minute live delay on the proceedings, without even a single ideologically friendly White House pool reporter in the audience – how long do you need to recognize a drooped eyebrow, a lagging tongue, unusually slurred speech? Experiencing some, uh, technical difficulties. Absent that, you shoot for a draw.

But Biden could not pull it off. Slurring and stumbling over his words, rasping, repeatedly relying on canned rhetorical filler (“number one. number two.” “and by the way.” “the idea that.”) and eventually concluding with a full “and by the way… [vacant stare]”. Unforced errors where he repeatedly focused on the economy, his area of primary weakness. Blunders like stuttering into “beating Medicare”. Unprompted, bringing up American citizens being murdered by illegals, giving Trump layup after layup. A physical performance of shuffling and staring, showing off his bizarre facelift topography time after time. Short of literally shitting his pants, this was as bad as it could possibly have gone.

Trump by contrast put in an adequate performance. Refusing to scare the hoes on abortion, his primary weakness with the white female swing demographic (“follow your heart”), ignoring questions where convenient in favor of repeated attacks, and a neat maneuver where for simple answers he would wail on Biden for the first minute and allow the hosts to re-prompt him so he could say the obvious thing.

In the aftermath, “panic” was the word repeatedly used. CNN implies it’s elder abuse. They beg the DNC to swap this guy out (for Kamala? lmao). “If you genuinely believe democracy is at stake, how can you let this happen?” (spoiler: they don’t, and they will).

CNN’s moderation was, incredibly, fair enough that one suspects they might have seen this coming, and were trying to gently push Grandpa over the cliff. It remains to be seen if the party can possibly maneuver a way for this to happen, but the fact is that Biden has won all the primaries and is still at least physically alive. If his wife was unwilling to pull the plug before he embarrassed himself to this degree, it’s pretty clear she prefers the Lady MacBeth ending to a dignified elder statesman retirement, and there is really no formal mechanism to keep Biden off the ticket as long as he retains his ego – gigantic enough, by the way, that he was able to be baited into lying about his golf game. “C’mon, man” indeed.

One could get conspiratorial and speculate about extra-formal mechanisms to make sure Biden doesn’t drag the rest of the party down with him, but frankly, Trump is probably someone the rest of the uniparty can deal with, and more of a known quantity than Kamala.

At this point in time the likeliest outcome is a repeat of the first Trump term, where lack of institutional support for anything but exclusively executive prerogatives (and inadequate staffing on those) results in an administration that doesn’t threaten left structural power, and can be saddled with the fallout from decades of bad policy.

If you are looking for a point of light on the substance of a second Trump term, it’s this: the moment of the debate that rang truest to me was when Trump insisted, twice, that he would rather not be running. He does have his businesses, his large and loving family, and his apparantly vibrant golf game – and instead of focusing on those when he actuarially has about 10 years left on earth, he is forced to either win or die in prison as the country burns around him.

The hope is that this was not false modesty, and he realizes that his legacy depends on destroying the people that forced a senile figurehead like Biden to take the flak while they loot a sinking ship. They cannot be allowed to do this again.

-By Hank Oslo

The post This Man Cannot Draw a Clock appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I don’t know much about spaceships. What I’ve observed over the years however, is that when something goes wrong they tend to explode. This is obviously not a great experience for anyone involved. Also, I saw in a movie that, historically, black women are responsible for programming our spaceships even though they were secretaries and this was the official responsibility of white mathematicians with PhDs. Thus, I have no desire to be shot into space.

Two astronauts are stuck in space because Boeing's Starliner can't make the journey back to Earth

Read morehttps://t.co/Vc9RJXOMju

— Sky News (@SkyNews) June 26, 2024

Apparently, we have a pair of astronauts stranded up there because the contraption built by Boeing to ferry them doesn’t work. I hope they can return to this shithole safely and perhaps they will by the time this gets published. It seems like they’ll just have to take their chances riding in a probable death trap since it’s the only way down.

Unfortunately, I’m going to have to classify them as “poor bastards.” These are victims whom I shrug off as the natural casualties of America just as I would expect them to do of myself under similar circumstances. You volunteer to be an astronaut and everyone knows that diversity is America’s top priority. Naturally, things will go wrong as a result.

A 737 jet nearly plunged straight into a neighborhood in California last week. The sort of carnage an impact would’ve caused is something most Americans would find rather disconcerting. In recent years, there have been two such 737 crashes, if I recall correctly. Boeing has admitted that diverse workers in South Carolina falsified 787 inspection records, and stuff has been falling off of other various models as well.

Southwest Boeing 737 plunges within 500 feet of Oakland neighborhood setting off emergency alarms and terrifying residents who feared it was going to crash into their homes https://t.co/nXm05E3axe pic.twitter.com/B0LJLJYSsE

— Daily Mail Online (@MailOnline) June 21, 2024

This is what I can recall, so there’s probably much more and all of it should be pertinent to someone considering getting shot into space in a boutique Boeing Starliner. I think the Russians had been taking care of this before Boeing with the Soyuz, but they got angry at an American astronaut for drilling a hole in it because she wanted to go home early. Maybe I’m remembering wrong, I just don’t care much about this stuff.

Right about this time last year, I wrote an article about my admiration for a flippant man named Stockton Rush. He told everyone that he thought he could make regular visits to the Titanic in a flimsy submersible operated with a Logitech controller. He didn’t guarantee, never said he was sure, and made his passengers sign a waiver so they were clear on this part:

“There’s a limit. At some point, safety just is pure waste. If you just want to be safe, don’t get out of bed, don’t get into your car, don’t do anything. At some point, you’re gonna take some risk and it really is a risk-reward question. … I think I can do this just as safely by breaking the rules.”

You’ve Always Been Here

There was an incredible amount of risk involved with letting this dude take you on a trip to the Titanic but the price was right and he told everyone up front that this was a risky proposition. In other words, he did nothing wrong in terms of his moral obligation to his passengers.

I just wish that Americans got this same deal with diversity. Boeing should warn all crew and passengers that diversity is the company’s priority, not safety. We all know that diversity is the priority no matter the consequences, so why can’t they just tell us that they think they can probably get us there safely instead of implying that we’re buying the outcome of reaching our destination alive?

We have to hear about how diversity is such an asset to Boeing instead of the jarring possibility that the passengers could be killed by it. In the very least, the airlines should play a highlight reel of these mishaps during the pre-flight video while the narrator talks about diversity and what to do in an emergency.

The post A Proper Risk Appraisal appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Metrics are important for understanding a conflict. For example, if one side is dropping over 3,000 glide bombs per month while the other side isn’t dropping bombs of any kind one can infer in whose favor the conflict is progressing.

Most of Ukraine’s air force was destroyed in the opening days of the special military operation. Soviet fighter jets intake air from the top of the plane during takeoff, enabling them to utilize roads and dirt runways. The remaining aircraft are scattered over western Ukraine where a Russian missile would have to travel for hours to strike, offering plenty of time to move them. Their impact on combat is negligible, given that all the fighting happens in the east of Ukraine under the cover of Russian AA.

Glide bombs were introduced last year and the scale of their application seems to have increased dramatically, which would comport with expanding production of glide kits and the destruction of Ukraine’s air defenses. They’re guided over long distances by GLONASS, the Russian version of GPS.

They pack punches of 250, 500, 1,500 and now 3,000 kg without requiring the jet to fly over the target so it can avoid coming in range of whatever remains of Ukraine’s AA network. While these devices don’t look fancy, they allow the Russians to mitigate the risks of dropping bombs like the JDAMs which became so familiar from the Global War on Terror.

The U.S. military developed to fight poor people ever since Vietnam, so this is the first time we’re seeing how difficult it is to take on a modern opponent in the year 2024. Somehow in the minds of my friends with silver oak leaves, we’d just be flying overhead and bombing the Russians like this is Iraq or Afghanistan. The ignorance of this notion is astounding, and it seems to me as the most significant risk to a broader war breaking out.

A three-ton FAB-3000 aerial bomb with planning and correction module. pic.twitter.com/sAqIzsrQqU

— Russian Market (@runews) June 23, 2024

Donbass is where the Soviets planned to make their final stand before evacuating Moscow if a confrontation with NATO was going poorly for them. This is one of the most fortified regions on the planet, and much of it to the point of being able to survive a nuclear strike so that troops could emerge to take on a NATO invasion afterwards. NATO had 8 years to work on them after we overthrew the Ukrainian government in 2014. It’s quite difficult to make a dent in many of these positions with artillery shells and large concrete apartment buildings add to the challenge.

The Russians have launched somewhere north of 7,000 cruise missiles into Ukraine. For example, some Kaliber variants can carry up to 500 kg of explosives but these things cost around 1,000,000 USD each and the scale of the fighting is vast. The Soviet bomb stockpiles for WW3 are inexhaustible for the purposes of this conflict and the kits cost a bit less that 25,000 USD to produce. This is a dramatic change, especially in the context of the sheer volume of bombs being dropped.

Some are thermobaric vacuum bombs which burst in the air to destroy the organs of everyone in the vicinity no matter where they’re sheltering. This is a very big difference from the positional artillery battles that shaped much of the early stages when the Russians had to contend with Ukrainian AA at its peak. A basement in a village might offer protection in that sort of situation, but one of these things will kill everyone in the village.

The mainstream media simply can’t stop lying and admit that the Ukrainian situation is utterly hopeless and moving towards some sort of collapse. The strategy for covering glide bombs is generally to admit that this is a problem, but avoid the inescapable implication that the Russians will continue to demolish what’s left of the Ukrainian military with these things and cite them as a reason why we need to supply Ukraine with F-16s to make their situation more tenable as if the small number would even matter and Russia doesn’t have interceptors and an AA network.

The bombs are also covered in the long-running fabricated context that the Russian military is comprised of a bunch of junk. They’ve been at this since Putin intervened to save the Syrian government from the U.S. effort to overthrow it in a civil war that we instigated just like in Ukraine. Unlike every single intervention the U.S. has done in the service of Zionism, this proved a resounding success. So, the junk works but it’s still junk somehow. I hear guys with advanced military educations tell me this idiotic nonsense.

A rational mind should be able to grasp that if one side in a war has an unlimited number of large explosive devices which can be dropped on the other with pretty much with impunity, things are going to get inexorably worse for the side on the receiving end. That’s not how things work with the U.S. military, or at least with anyone who wants to stick around for a career. This does explain quite a bit, however.

The Ukrainians are losing upwards of 2,000 men per day, many of whom are dragged off the streets and sent to the front in order to man positions, so the Russians are deterred from strolling in. Americans can’t fathom the slaughter going on over there, which only continues for the reason that their government won’t let it stop because that would be an admission everyone over here was wrong.

The post Gliding to Perdition appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

After a fairly lackluster June, recent news seems to indicate that things will pick up quite a lot for the month of July.

World events have been relatively quiet for a minute now. At least, “quiet” in the context of the greater overall shifting power structures around the world, which have been going haywire since 2020.

But a few key developments seem to indicate that this calm before the storm is rapidly ending.

First off, the Israel and Lebanon war that is about to begin. This conflict will certainly be used as a proxy war between the West and the rapidly developing BRICS bloc. We have deployed quite a bit of money and weapons against the Russians, Chinese, Iranians, and so on, and I expect them to return the favor by supporting Hezbollah and the Syrian/Iraqi proxies. This war in particular has the risk of easily exploding into not just a larger regional war, but a world war.

Then there are the increasing terrorist attacks happening on Russian soil. The most recent one in Dagestan claiming the lives of dozens of Orthodox Christians. All of these attacks are conducted or fueled by the Islamic State (ISIS). Shocking to absolutely no one, this is the same group that is front-run by the Israelis and the United States. Haven’t you ever wondered why the supposedly Islamic-Jihadi organization has never attacked Israel, but has attacked every country that opposes Israel? Russia knows this as well as we do. These attacks, many against Christians, are deliberate attacks by the Satanic United States. Russia has even said that they understand the situation as much. The question is only how long they are going to continue to endure such fragrant assaults against their own civilians without escalation, which is clearly what the West wants.

Next up, we have some pretty unexpected developments on the Asian front. In particular, one under-reported one is that the Philippines and the Chinese are going again at it again. I’m not super surprised, but you know somehow it stems from the provocation of the West. Then there is the whole North Korea business. They’re actually sending troops over the DMZ zone to test the South, and they just signed a major defensive pact with Russia. Also, Japan is building up her armies, against their historical norm. And Taiwan just had their elections, and elected a very pro-West, United States proxy leader. Sides are being drawn through every one of these events, that much is obvious. But tensions are also heating up, far more than they have been earlier in this year.

Finally, we can’t forget the looming South American invasion by Venezuela into Guyana that is certain to come. Really, I think the Venezuelans are just waiting for more pressing wars to pop off before they decide to jump into the worldwide chaos under the radar. Probably a wise choice.

Looking back, the first half of this year was relatively dull. At least, I think we will be saying that once the second half of this year is finished, and all the above is not even considering that it’s an election year here in the States.

War and rumors of wars everywhere. I don’t know if the world has been this much on the precipice in my entire lifetime. Even the so-called War on Terror didn’t have the same feeling that this one does.

Call it intuition, or just an odd gut feeling, but I think 2024 and 2025 are going to be the years of substantial change across this world. The kind of change that we haven’t previously seen in any of our lifetimes.

The post Wars and Rumors Of Wars appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

It has been brought to my attention that our beloved Disney princesses are no longer being considered the role models they once were, as modern feminists have once again dug their claws into condemning traditional femininity.

Snow White is by far one of the most heavily criticized princesses, especially by the woman who is supposed to be playing her in a live action adaptation, Rachel Zegler. Despite her role as the title character, it is clear that Rachel Zegler has no respect for the original film. She claims it is “outdated” due to Snow White’s wish for love and her soft personality. But, may I ask why it is so terrible for someone to dream about love and
being saved by a prince? I know I speak for many women when I say that being taken care of is something rather appealing. Love is the backbone of humanity; should we not all strive to love and be loved?

Additionally, Snow White’s soft personality is the epitome of strength. Keep in mind that Snow White is a victim of abuse; she has every reason to be bitter and closed-off, but she isn’t. Instead, she shows her strength by showing kindness to the people around her and keeping her cheerful demeanor. I mean, her first instinct when entering the dwarves’ cottage is to cook and clean for them out of the goodness of her heart. She is a beautiful example of true femininity. Why is Snow White being criticized for weakness
when she is stronger than the women who hate her?

It seems not even the women of the Disney renaissance are safe, as Keira Knightley once stated in an interview that she would not let her daughter watch The Little Mermaid. “Why is that?” you ask? Well, because apparently Ariel “sold her voice for a man.” Such a comment makes me wonder if Keira Knightley has ever even watched the film herself. If she had, she would know that Ariel’s goal, before she ever laid eyes on Prince Eric, was to explore the human world. In her song, “Part of Your World,” she sings “I want to be where the people are,” not “I want to be where this hot guy is.” I find it odd that a character like Ariel would be criticized by a modern feminist, considering her personality could be viewed as rather progressive: rebellious, stubborn, curious, and independent. But, of course, nothing is good enough for these so called “feminists.”

People like Rachel Zegler and Keira Knightly will never fail to misinterpret the beauty of these stories for shallow activism. However, in reality, these classic princesses are some of the strongest role models for little girls. These tales have stood the test of time for a reason. And while I personally do not support the current state of the Disney company, I will not stand for slander of the creative storytelling that shaped mine and so many others’ childhoods.

-By Miss Sirius Lee
II Thess. 3:17

The post The Poisoned Apple of Modernity appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

A friend of mine remarked to me on the absurdity of the homosexual colored man in a dress on the White House lawn. She had just scrolled across the story on her phone. I shrugged and replied that this was our country. We already had a topless tranny on the same patch of grass. He’s what you realize that something is amiss around this national nightmare? But hey, at least she noticed.

Billy Porter greets President Biden at the White House Juneteenth Concert. pic.twitter.com/aP5UrYYYn1

— Chris D. Jackson (@ChrisDJackson) June 11, 2024

At this point, I’m far less triggered by the things I notice than the fact that other people don’t seem to be noticing. The inescapable implication, that most of us will perish horrifically in the final collapse of America, I’ve basically made my peace with as well. It’s everybody else’s blindness that I find disconcerting.

Documentaries now made for Americans utilize footage shown for no more than a minute at a time interspliced with footage of someone being interviewed about the topic. Many different people are interviewed about whatever topic who don’t need to be interviewed at all.

The documentary could simply feature one contiguous piece of footage with a a single narrator who is never shown on camera. If you’re not retarded and possess an attention span long enough to learn anything of value, this is a superior format. Moreover, it’s really annoying to constantly have the screen switched.

I find this infuriating to the point of making outbursts at the TV set like my grandfather used to do quite often in his later years. I’ve had people remark that they didn’t even notice how this format is how all the shows are done nowadays. When I comment on the dystopian qualities of various commercials, I receive similar responses.

Thus, it’s not a surprise that the average American doesn’t fathom just how badly things are going. This would include most of my friends and family. They don’t seem to be on the same planet and yet here they are, I’m not sure about this physics of this phenomenon.

I take it for granted that everything will fall apart, but if you’d told me that a decade ago I’d have thought the notion to be rather fanciful. Still, back then they were saying that most of us would perish due to the melting of the polar ice caps. Some would presumably survive like the characters from Water World. I enjoyed that movie but have never worried about living out this scenario.

So, that was one thing but I didn’t realize that as the ice caps failed to melt and we all continued to prolong our existences on dry land that lunatics would start gluing themselves to busy roads and attacking priceless works of art to alert everyone of impending doom. Now they’re attacking sporting events.

BREAKING: Climate activists throw smoke grenades and spray paint as they storm the green at the 18th hole of the PGA Tour Travelers Championship⁰

Cromwell | #Connecticut⁰⁰Just Moments ago, Just Stop Oil protesters climate activists, ran with spray paint and threw smoke… pic.twitter.com/FPuVCHtB8A

— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) June 23, 2024

These lunatics are just as convinced as myself that most of us are going to perish, but the difference is that they’re trying to save the world by trying to get everyone’s attention. I merely write articles on the internet to vent.

On the one hand, I think to myself that this was inevitable and is probably preferrable to them conducting actual terrorist attacks like Al Qaeda. On the other, they want everyone to be forced to stop using oil, gas, and coal by the government. This would lead to the collapse of society overnight. So, everyone would perish either way. There’s really no point to their campaign of soft terrorism. But where’s the fun in that?

I’ve realized the grim reality is that we all have to find our fun where we can, because hope ain’t to be had anymore. They’re not wrong about this part. What wacky stunt are they going to pull next?

The younger of the two protestors at Stonehenge is 21yr old Niamh Lynch, educated at £18k a year @BedfordModern

A private education that got her into @UniofOxford

A ultra privileged brat trying to damage 5000 year old stones

pic.twitter.com/XVr8ZylE1F pic.twitter.com/4KCMmprZNF

— Le_Sorelle_Arduino KPSS (@Sorelle_Arduino) June 19, 2024

The post Doing Something About It appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’m not in the restaurant business. Although, I take a practical approach to what I order based upon where I order it. For example, I wouldn’t go to a diner off the side of a highway far from any salt water and order the surf and turf. Get the pancakes with the eggs and bacon. Rarely will any such establishment screw this up.

What the hell is wrong with you? You think the guy in the back went to a dock at 5:30 AM this morning to pick the best of the day’s catch? No, there’s a bag of frozen shrimp he opens to grab out a handful every few weeks. Disgusting.

I know people who constantly make these sorts of blunders, and the results serve them right. A grim sense of practicality will never disappoint you, while the notion you can just order whatever you want will let you down nearly every time. I’ve never once considered eating at a Red Lobster.

Red Lobster abruptly closes at least 50 restaurants, blindsiding employees — including 14 in NY, NJ https://t.co/vnq1vVhFbG pic.twitter.com/SMT1WxSJSG

— New York Post (@nypost) May 14, 2024

I saw that McDonald’s is bringing back its 5-dollar meal. I get that everyone is barely surviving, but why do you think you can buy a meal of food from McDonald’s for 5 dollars? Whatever they’re serving is probably outright poisonous. For less than 5 dollars you could eat 6 hard boiled eggs and whatever fruit is cheapest at that time of the year. At this price, you can still eat food, you’ll just have to bring it to work and you’re probably not going to look forward to eating it.

Sure, a burger and fries are way better, but don’t think that’s what you can have for 5 dollars. McDonald’s isn’t running a charity, it’s there to stuff you with the cheapest slop that fools you into thinking it’s food until you keel over and die. Get real, lower your expectations. Do you think the sailors who made it to America reveled in eating hard tack?

McDonald's $5 meal deal could win back inflation-weary customers, Bank of America says https://t.co/pWGSVI9qzZ

— Quartz (@qz) May 13, 2024

Soylent green could win back desperate street dwellers, authorities say. As Americans, we’ve been used to a good standard of living in which anything we want is available to anyone at any time of the year. That’s not the case anymore, but Americans have still been spending this way, probably because credit cards have made up the difference. The average debt per credit card (not consumer) is around twice what the average consumer is taking home every month. Once those minimum payments get too high, a crisis ensues, which probably explains what’s happening to restaurants like Red Lobster.

Eating out is one of the easiest things to economize on. When you’re home, you can eat food that you cooked there for a much lower price and if you’re at work you can always bring a sandwich. It’s not so easy on the road, but it’s the best we can expect.

The post End of the Endless Shrimp appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Serving as emperor of Rome from 161AD to 189AD, Marcus Aurelius was considered the last of the five ‘good emperors’, and oversaw a time of relative peace and prosperity at home while stabilizing the empire’s frontiers abroad. Noted for his modesty and dedication to stoic philosophy, Aurelius’ writings serve as a guidepost for many seeking wisdom on life, rule, and what we leave behind. Tonight we are joined by Zach from Logos Revealed to examine Aurelius’ most famous work, ‘Meditations’, and to explore its lessons for leadership in a corrupt modern world.

— Brought to you by —

Zach from Logos Revealed

Odysee Channel LogosRevealed – https://odysee.com/@LogosRevealed:0
Twitter/X – @LogosRevealedI

—

General Lance
https://link.space/@LancesLegion
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAioE7UWN_tV6gVFcqQZqPw
Lance’s new book: Caesar Bellator – https://www.amazon.com/dp/1957583193
DVX Publishing – https://www.dvxpublishingcompany.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LancesLegion

Marcus Aurelius – Stoicism in a time of Empire (Myth20c – Ep272) (odysee.com)

— References —

• Republic, Plato (375 BC)
• Meditations, Aurelius (180)
• Coriolanus, Shakespeare (1605)
• Gladiator, Scott (2000)

The post Myth of the 20th Century: Marcus Aurelius – Stoicism in a Time of Empire appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In the quiet corners of our Southern heritage, where the land speaks of centuries past and tradition holds sway, the story of Anna Madgigine Jai Kingsley deserves a mention. Her life, marked by resilience, intelligence, and an indomitable spirit, stands as a testament to the rich and complex history of the South. Yet, modern narratives, influenced by Reconstructionist ideologies, often overlook her remarkable legacy.

Anna Madgigine Jai Kingsley, born around 1793 in West Africa, was thrust into a world of turmoil when she was captured by fellow black Africans and sold into slavery. She arrived in Cuba, where fate brought her into the life of Zephaniah Kingsley, a wealthy planter known for his unconventional views and complex character. Purchased at the tender age of 13, she became Zephaniah’s wife and, in 1811, a free woman.

Zephaniah Kingsley was an eccentric figure, to say the least, often speaking out about the practicalities of slavery while simultaneously benefiting from the institution. His interviews and writings reveal a man who believed in the rights of free blacks and the necessity of a multi-racial society, views that were certainly controversial for his time and remain so with those of us concerned with preserving our genetic legacy. His relationship with Anna was likely a blend of personal affection and strategic alliance, ensuring her freedom and positioning her as a significant figure in their community. Kingsley thought of himself as a pragmatist above all else. He would subsequently marry additional former slaves, forming something of a harem.

Anna’s freedom was not merely a legal status but a gateway to extraordinary achievements. She managed the Kingsley plantation on Fort George Island in Florida with remarkable acumen. Upon Zephaniah’s death in 1843, Anna inherited his estate which she maintained, slaves and all, through the War of Northern Aggression. She owned extensive lands and held slaves, navigating the social and legal intricacies of her time. Her story is not one of passive existence but of active agency and success within the societal framework of her era.

Modern historical narratives often fail to accommodate such complexity. These narratives seek to cast history in stark terms of oppressors and oppressed, a framework into which Anna Kingsley’s life does not neatly fit. As a former slave who became a slave owner, her story challenges the simplistic binaries that dominate contemporary discourse. This ideological lens tends to simplify and sanitize the past to fit modern leftist’ sensibilities. It overlooks the rich tapestry of individual experiences in favor of a monolithic view that erases the nuanced realities of our history. By sidelining figures like Anna Kingsley, this approach deprives us of a fuller understanding of the South.

The omission of Kingsley’s legacy from mainstream narratives is not just an oversight but a deliberate act of historical revisionism. It reflects a tendency to prioritize ideological conformity over historical accuracy, erasing the stories that do not fit a predetermined mold. By neglecting the achievements of individuals like Anna Kingsley, we impoverish our understanding of the past and diminish the rich history of Dixie. Her story encourages us to look beyond simplistic narratives and appreciate the full spectrum of our heritage. It reminds us that the past is not a canvas to be painted over with modern ideologies, but a tapestry of human experiences that demands our respect and recognition.

-By Jack Milton

The post Anna Kingsley and the Victims of Reconstructionist Revisionism appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The so-called “Reconstruction” period in the South, after the shooting phase of the War of Northern Aggression ceased, set in motion an insidious trend that has yet to be reversed in this country. That avoidable war brought monstrous federal intrusion into the private lives of individuals on a heretofore undreamed-of level. “Reconstruction” in the South set up virtual military dictatorships in all the former Confederate states. The banner of what today is referred to as reverse racism was raised atop the federal flagpole and flown on high. It has yet to be taken down. In fact, with the Biden/Obama regime now in power, they are busy building a higher flagpole for it.

This trend toward centralized federal pre-eminence has never been reversed, nor will it be until this country wakes up or folds up. And if it folds up as the Biden/Obama regime plans for it to, it won’t make any difference.

Several years ago, my family and I took a trip (one of many over the years). On the way home, we stopped at the National Historical Park at Harpers Ferry, (West) Virginia. At that site the town has been in the process of being reconstructed that that it will eventually appear just as it did when abolitionist/terrorist John Brown conducted his raid there in 1859. Maybe by now they’ve finished with the reconstruction, I don’t know. They filmed part of the movie Gods and Generals there. If you all have not seen that movie you should. Many have claimed that Harpers Ferry has been turned into a secular shrine to glorify John Brown. It would seem that those who have labored hard to do that must approve of Brown’s violent terrorist tactics.

Anyway, while on our visit there, we chanced to visit the building that had housed the Provost Marshall’s office. A lady there, dressed in period attire, explained to the tourists that during the War of Northern Aggression (she didn’t call it that), Harpers Ferry was under federal jurisdiction, and was therefore, under the control of the Provost Marshall. When the lady explained what powers this man had, I could not help thinking that the Provost Marshall was, for all intents and purposes, a federal dictator. As I pondered how that war had paved for future federal dictatorships, a picture of the Supreme Court suddenly flashed through my mind.

Court watchers have noted, with appropriate apprehension over the years, some of the “interesting” decisions of the court. The decisions that Comrade Obama’s forcing everyone to buy his “health” insurance or be fined was little more than judicial quackery. But the court seemed to have no problem with it. There was a decision back in 2005, I think it was, in the state of Connecticut that allowed a city to use eminent domain, (something I’ve always hated) to attempt to seize the property of several homeowners. Apparently, some cities in Connecticut felt they could make better use of some people’s property than the property owners could and so property was taken under the eminent domain clause. This is something I have never agreed with. It’s one of those weak spots the Constitution is famous for.

George Will was never one of my favorite columnists, but on occasion he came up with an article that showed some insight. Several years ago now, he did a column dealing with a decision of the Supreme Court. He noted, “The Court bestowed, prospectively, its constitutional imprimatur on virtually any racial spoils system Congress enacts. The Court selectively overturned a series of precedents that had at least limited the proliferation of what are euphemistically called ‘race-conscious policies’.”

In this particular instance Will observed that the Court, by a 5-4 majority ruled that Congress may assign special benefits to particular government-preferred minorities (to the detriment of all who do not make the preferred list) and Congress may do so without regard to any injury resulting from discrimination. Reverse discrimination is now cut loose from the pretense that it is merely a remedial measure.” Take a good look at Will’s comment and let it sink in. Doesn’t it make you feel good if you happen to belong to some group that hasn’t made the government’s “preferred” list—like white Christian Southerners for example?

Some have taken exception to court rulings of this nature, claiming they violate the constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law. Sorry folks, but that one was thrown under the bus a long time ago according to Will. “Equal protection is not violated if the injury done by reverse discrimination serves an important government objective.” Did you all get that. Equal protection is not violated by unequal treatment as long as “important government objectives” are being served. Question—where is this situation any different than what occurred during the first phase of “Reconstruction” after the Marxist/Lincolnist Revolution of 1861 aka as the Civil War?

Theologian C. Gregg Singer aptly pointed out in his book A Theological Interpretation of American History that the real aim of Thaddeus Stevens and his fellow Northern revolutionaries was a program of “reconstruction” that would start in the South and would be handled in such a way as to eventually include the entire country. The entire fabric of American life, North and South, was to be “reconstructed” according to their revolutionary aims. And guess what, folks, due to the advent of the public school system, first in the North, then in the “reconstructed” South, it has mostly worked!

So, let’s summarize. The “reconstruction” (Marx’s term) in the South set forth a policy of reverse discrimination where there was no protection under the law for Southern whites because it had been determined that reverse discrimination in regard to freed slaves served “an important government objective” of working to “ensure the perpetual ascendancy of the party of the Union” (the Republican Party).

Both North and South lived through the first phase of “reconstruction” until both became “reconstructed” enough so that most memories of a truly Christian America were obliterated.

That having been accomplished, it is now time for us to begin to realize that we are, at present, and for the discernable future, in the midst of the second phase of “reconstruction”. The perpetually ascending federal government, (the secular deity) via its court system, is busily enacting quotas and racial preference agendas and telling local school districts they have the power to raise taxes on their own, even if voters have voted down the proposed tax increase. When President Trump was in office he tried to give us a more conservative Supreme Court. But he was only one man and he got precious little support or good advice from the Deep State moles in his own administration.

It would seem that the chickens of American apostasy, turned loose in the 1820s, have now come home to roost. Many years ago, Rev R. L. Dabney in his book Defense of Virginia and the South wrote: “A righteous God, for our sins toward Him, has permitted us to be overthrown by our enemies and His.” Although he was speaking at that time to Southerners, his commentary is now appropriate for the entire country. One of the main fruits of apostasy is more and ever repressive government. Until apostasy is repudiated and a Christian culture is sought after and worked for, things will only get worse and we will continue to have rulers like Barack Obama and China Joe Biden, who are truly the fruit of and result of apostasy.

-By Al Benson Jr.

The post A Second Phase of “Reconstruction” appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Editor’s Note: The following is a book promotion for Red Pandemic: The Global Marxist Cult by Emmet Connor, an Irish author, podcaster and X-spaces host, and online content creator. His work focuses on many issues that align with Identity Dixie’s content, such as dismantling progressivism, liberalism, and globalism.

In Red Pandemic, Mr. Connor exposes the source of all the crazy revolutionary activism and chaos in the world today – the ideology of Marxism – highlighting its unrivalled toxic impact on world affairs and humanity in general.

You can purchase Red Pandemic directly from the publisher’s website Omnia Veritas, and from several online vendors including Amazon, Barnes and Noble, AbeBooks, Books A Million, Powell’s Books, Alibris, Bookshop.org, and Indiebound. At present there is no audiobook or kindle version.

For more information regarding Mr. Connor’s work and content activism, please visit his website, Resolving Reality. Or, you can follow him on X.

Below are general themes found in the book for our interested readers:

Marxism is the most destructive ideology the world has ever seen, yet it’s not widely understood. It’s good at repackaging itself, using different labels, like a snake shedding its skin.

All the major destabilizing, civilization-destroying issues in the world today – the various Marxist “sub-agendas” – are all driven by the same revolutionary ideology. They include mass immigration, the climate change movement, radical sex education, feminism, abortion, BLM and anti-racism, LGBTQ + non-binary, veganism, anti-Christianity, etc.

Crucially, the ideology’s presence in any given country also leads to the absence of national sovereignty, the breakdown of law and order, racial tensions, economic collapse, etc. (Note: the main agenda of Marxism is to create a Marxist world. It’s in the nature of the ideology to spread and dominate; to create a world federation via the United Nations, European Union, World Economic Forum, World Health Organization, etc. Concepts such as “New World Order” and “Globalism” are essentially Marxist in nature).

Marxism, Socialism, and Communism – What’s the difference? (these labels confuse people and are a major problem).

1. “Marxism” is the overall ideology.
2. “Socialism” is the application of Marxist theories to society, economics including resources, government, etc.
3. It is widely regarded as being a ‘transitional’ phase between capitalism and communism.
4. “Communism” is the hypothetical future ‘utopian’ society that could be created (after a period of socialism).

Simplest definition – Marxism is essentially crazy revolutionary activism in all its forms.

• Misdiagnosis of the problem: many erroneous terms are used to describe the cult/ideology including “liberalism,” “progressivism.”
• Marxism attacks the pillars of Western civilization – Capitalism, Christianity, and Culture, in addition to the traditional nuclear family unit.
• The “Oppressor v Oppressed” principle is a core, ever-present ingredient of the ideology (of Marxism) that drives the brainwashing, and therefore the “sub-agendas” (listed above). It was originally part of the “class struggle” between the rich and the poor mentioned in The Communist Manifesto (1848) but has mutated into other forms. Now this “class struggle” idea has morphed into white v black, man v woman, straight v gay, trans v non-trans, etc. Marxism divides and conquers, by splitting people in to opposing groups, using the “class struggle” concept of Oppressor v Oppressed.
• Nationalism (genuine patriotism) is the solution to ‘globalism’, and Marxism is antagonistic to nationalism. Marxism is essentially AIDS for countries, since it attacks and erodes a nation’s sense of identity and culture (which compose the immune system of a nation). It’s the antithesis to national strength and sovereignty. It will be exceedingly difficult for anyone/any nation to stop this ‘progressive’ globalist monster unless we sufficiently address the problem of Marxist pro-globalist indoctrination in our countries. The Marxist cult members active in our countries act as a treasonous parasite, holding us all back. Being more consciously anti-Marxist will be the adrenaline shot to boost nationalistic sentiment in Western countries.
• Marxism is an anti-humanity ideology. It is basically Satanism repackaged. We can see the Satanic DNA in some of the things that the Marxist cult/ideology pushes or justifies including abortion, trans/non-binary nonsense, and pedophilia.
• It basically inverts right and wrong, and “normalizes” evil, which is Satanic. Example – “male” is now “female”; Abortion is “healthcare”; Pedophilia is “just another type of sexual orientation,” etc.

Marxism is a cult, and not merely just a political/geo-political movement or “philosophical” school of thought. It is also the worst mental health crisis the world has ever seen. It literally brainwashes people into being anti-humanity, anti-civilization, etc.

The post Red Pandemic: The Global Marxist Cult appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The situation with the Houthis in Yemen encapsulates the insanity of America’s foreign policy. Their operation against shipping by countries which support Israel is a direct response declared against the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

They’ve offered to stop immediately if the genocide stops. That’s all it would take, just desisting from this genocide which goes against all the values America claims and our self-declared moral leadership of the planet. Instead, we launched Operation Prosperity Guardian which has been a predictable failure. Even the name is a joke.

WATCH | Yemeni air defenses shot down a US MQ9 drone in the airspace of Maarib, west of Yemen, with a locally produced surface-to-air missile. pic.twitter.com/kIOWEcO0fI

— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) May 17, 2024

For all of the firepower the United States can deliver from above, the devastation inflicted on the Houthis isn’t what the public was led to believe. Why anyone would’ve been expecting success in the context of what happened in Vietnam and Afghanistan is a fair question. The recent Saudi war on the Houthis failed despite a much more ruthless approach. There’s a definitive pattern to these ill-fated endeavors.

The Gaza Strip has had more bombs dropped on it than both Dresden and Hamburg, while the Jews are still taking casualties without an end in sight. What’s more, Western drones which used to surveille and strike with impunity are being shot down. This isn’t the Global War on Terror anymore.

The U.S. military has never before had to fight an adversary with all the insurgent advantages of the Taliban, but capable of striking international shipping with ballistic missiles, while shooting down American drones. This pretty much sums up the Houthis.

The American Empire was never able to subdue the Taliban, but it wasn’t in such a vulnerable position in terms of the Taliban’s firepower. For instance, if the Houthis can take out MQ9 drones, helicopters would be at significant risk if the failure of airstrikes leads to a ground incursion in Yemen.

The small, cheap drones, available to everyone, have also revolutionized warfare in ways which the United States will struggle to overcome if a wider conflict breaks out. The Russians have acquired far more experience in countering drones, but they still have big problems with these things despite the adaptations.

They’ve also used them to take out American tanks and armored vehicles operated by the Ukrainians. There’s been plenty of sport made out of the losses the Russians have suffered from drone strikes, but the United States hasn’t yet had to contend with anything on the scale of what they’ve been trying to mitigate.

BREAKING

Hezbollah now possesses more than 1 million rockets of various types – Quds Force official told Foreign Policy magazine

This changes everything, since Western intelligence agencies estimated that Hezbollah has around 200,000 rockets pic.twitter.com/E9gPsIdoZk

— Iran Observer (@IranObserver0) June 12, 2024

An important reason for why the firepower of Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis has become a salient question is that Netanyahu’s faction of Jews seems to be trying to provoke a broader conflict in the Middle East that will drag the U.S. military in directly on their behalf with the goal being to collapse Iran and put an end to Hezbollah.

Getting rid of Hezbollah’s opposition is an absolute necessity for Zionist expansion, which these Jews must’ve calculated will be an easier task once its Iranian base of support has been eliminated. They can’t eliminate either Iran or Hezbollah on their own or even subdue the Gaza Strip. Hezbollah already defeated them back in 2006.

Sure, these are deranged, evil Jews but the logic of why they need their Golem to enter the fray is obvious and it would explain why they started a conflict which they have zero chance of winning on their own.

This is insane. Hezbollah drones are out there screenshotting all sensitive Israeli positions, chemical and oil storages and the entire port of Haifa while the Iron Dome is clueless. Hezbollah will destroy the port if Israel attacks Lebanonpic.twitter.com/4YhXnoUHQJ

— Hadi (@HadiNasrallah) June 18, 2024

It’s quite possible they wanted Hamas to retaliate last October and allowed it to happen without preemption as a pretext for a definitive victory against the militant enemies of Zionism. After the Hamas raid, the IDF promptly attacked Lebanon and demanded that Hezbollah cede strategic territory along the Litani River so the notion that this conflict is about addressing the threat from Hamas is ridiculous.

We’re 76 years into the nightmare entity known as Israel, with the historical expiration date in the minds of the aforementioned Jews for Jewish kingdoms being 80 years. They’re already in a crisis they can’t extricate themselves from and, if they lose political power, Netanyahu is going to prison for corruption.

A confluence of factors is pushing them towards an escalation. The direction seems inexorable if the Biden Jews can’t rein them in somehow. It must be frustrating for them that Netanyahu is focused only on his own ambitions regardless of the war they started with Russia, which is going very badly for NATO. He doesn’t even seem capable of taking the implications of this ongoing failure into account.

The Commanding Officer of the Northern Command, MG Ori Gordin, and the Head of the Operations Directorate, MG Oded Basiuk, approved operational plans and held a joint situational assessment in the Northern Command earlier today.

As part of the situational assessment,…

— Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) June 18, 2024

The Jews in the Biden Administration clearly don’t want a showdown right now and have been pleading with Netanyahu to back off. Finding some way to deescalate the situation is the only rational course of action given the current realities of military power.

These efforts don’t seem to be of much avail and the split between these factions of Jews has grown quite public. It’s somewhat hilarious that the Western media can cover this disagreement without acknowledging it’s between different factions of Jews, one of which is in control of the U.S. government and the other whose distinction is a higher degree of blind psychopathy.

'Amos Hochstein has made numerous trips here without much success because Hezbollah is an Iranian organ. I don't think Tehran wants to lose their big card after losing Hamas,'@DannyAyalon discusses the US envoy's visit to Israel and Lebanon amid tensions pic.twitter.com/d63qn6yr50

— i24NEWS English (@i24NEWS_EN) June 17, 2024

Wariness of the Biden Administration Jews towards getting dragged into another major conflict at the moment is probably irrelevant since they wouldn’t be able to let Israel get itself wiped out. The Netanyahu Jews are in the driver’s seat on this one. They’re basically retarded and don’t seem to grasp what limited utility the U.S. military proffers towards their ultimate objectives.

Whatever happens next, it won’t be good for Israel. It’s not like we get a say in anything that happens, so all we can do is wait and watch. The Madness of the Jew is the stage America has reached.

Holy sh*t

Hezbollah broadcasted live footage from a drone over a military airfield in Haifa protected by the Iron Dome

Israeli media is calling this is one of the most humiliating days for Israel pic.twitter.com/2uHsLKpTjh

— Iran Observer (@IranObserver0) June 18, 2024

The post Saving our Greatest Ally appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In the book American Nations by Colin Woodard, he argues that “North America” has 11 distinct cultural nations. I would generally agree with this assertion. Unfortunately, Woodard is a Yankee, and his bias shows throughout the book. I’ve come to the conclusion that the book is a solid read for those opposed to the “one American nation” theory. As a Southern Nationalist, I can see American Nations providing Southerners with a solid blueprint on how to view the rest of the country. In this article, I’ll be addressing and adding to the argument regarding the existence of the “Midlander” nation.

The Midlands, argued by Collins, is a nation founded by the Pennsylvania “Dutch” (Germans) and Quakers in the 1600s. The region is to the south of Yankeedom and New Netherlands, but north of Appalachia and Tidewater. In many ways, the Midlands is one that is often in conflict with the others but also the adjudicator in many of the political contests between the main nations on the East Coast. The Midlands also sprouted from Pennsylvania; the state renowned for being a swing state. It should be remembered that the United States’ capital once sat in Philadelphia, largely as a compromise between the Northern and Southern colonies. While today the city’s nickname is an ironic joke, it once was the motto for the Midlander nation, “brotherly love.” Nonetheless, the capital’s presence there was an early foreshadowing of its position as a swing state.

In the early decades of the Union, the Midlanders and the South had a relatively strong relationship. Regional divides, while present, had not grown as challenging as they would later. In this time, Midlanders were largely just a strong section across Pennsylvania, northern Delaware and southern New Jersey. During these early days, they would quickly rally behind the Democratic-Republicans under the leadership of Virginia Tidewater statesmen. Pennsylvania voted for the winner of the majority of presidential races with the exceptions of 1804 and 1824. Thus, early in this era, the South had a solid relationship with the region which helped cement the rule of Jeffersonianism and then Jacksonianism in the Union.

Dixie’s troublesome history with this region began in the 1840s, when the Midlands became the first of the American nations to fully reject slavery. In turn, the Midlands started becoming politically and culturally averse towards the South and, eventually, the Southern people. The Quakers, especially, were given to abolitionist sentiments, which put them at odds with Dixie. However, for the most part, the Midlands were nowhere as vindictive and antagonistic as the New England Yankees. This would change with the 1860 election, when the Midlanders sided with the Republicans (a purely regional party). Lincoln would carry Pennsylvania with 56% of the vote. While not as hardline Republican as the New England Yankees, Midlanders came to detest secession, considering it treason, and thus transformed into enemies of the Southern people during our war for independence.

Nonetheless, a sizable number of the Midlander people would come to reconsider the actual cost “of saving the Union” with the massive amount of bloodshed by the Lincoln regime. Due to this, a strong peace movement developed in the North, particularly when Southern armies scored victories during 1861 and 1862. Eventually, this would cause New Netherlands, the Midlands and Northern Appalachia to re-evaluate their war on Dixie. By 1864, these nations would unite under a Philadelphian, General George B. McClellan. In many ways, Lee’s invasion into Pennsylvania in 1863 was an effort not just to win international support but also bring the impact of the war directly to the uncertain Pennsylvanian Midlanders. The offensive, of course, sadly failed, but nonetheless caused a momentary hesitation. In 1863, bodies lining the roads of Gettysburg would bring the horror of war directly to the Keystone State.

By early 1864, the war to “save the Union” had caused the deaths of thousands of young men from the North and the war itself seemed to be in a brutal stalemate. War morale in the Union seemed to drop, causing even the tyrant Lincoln to believe he would lose re-election. With this, Northern Democrats, many noted as “Copperheads,” would nominate General McClellan for president, as well as anti-war Borderlander George H. Pendleton of southern Ohio for vice president. They campaigned for peace and advocated for negotiations with the Confederacy. In many ways, the 1864 election was the truly most decisive one in American history – had McClellan won, it’s likely that the Confederacy would have negotiated a peaceful settlement. However, as everyone knows, events did not unfortunately unfold that way.

With the fall of Atlanta, Sherman was able to save Lincoln’s re-election. It also helped that Lincoln had created several new states by this point, like Nevada and “West Virginia.” On top of this, Union soldiers in Missouri, Maryland, Tennessee, and Louisiana were all able to vote and keep potential Southern Democrats away from the polls. By November, a majority of Midlanders flipped back to their former war mongering ways to finish off the South; ironically, only New Netherland (greater New York City and northern New Jersey) stood by McClellan’s peace hopes. The only states McClellan carried would be his then-home state of New Jersey, Delaware and Kentucky (a Southern borderland state). He also came relatively close (1% margin) in winning New York thanks to Democrat New Netherlands. With McClellan’s defeat, the tyrant’s boot finally crushed the outmanned and outgunned Confederacy in 1865.

In the decades after the defeat of the South, the Midlanders would largely find themselves in unison with Yankeedom on how to govern the “redeemed” Union. The (forced) United States truly grew corrupt during these decades, morphing into the Yankee Empire with massive corporate overlords. In the first election post-Reconstruction, Pennsylvanian Midlander Winfield Scott Hancock represented a weakened Democratic Party against the Republicans. General Hancock had famously sided with President Johnson for a more lenient version of Reconstruction, which caused Hancock to lose his command of the 5th Military District (Texas and Louisiana). In many ways, he was a solid picture of the Midlander in their more “moderate” ways, which often found them in opposition to the tyrannical measures of the fanatical Yankee Republicans during Reconstruction. From Reconstruction until 1916 (Woodrow Wilson being the interesting exception) not a single Democratic Party nominee for president was from the South, despite the South being a major faction in the party. However, Midlanders would continue to hold national power, and this was particularly true in the 1950s.

Following the collapse of the New Deal coalition in the late 1940s, the Republican Party would finally take back power with the 1952 election. In this, a supposed “Southerner,” who was born in Texas, which helped him win the state that year, and in 1956, wasn’t actually a Southerner. In truth, by blood, mindset, and raising, Dwight D. Eisenhower was a Midlander. To begin, Eisenhower’s family was from central Kansas, with their ancestry traced back to the Pennsylvania colony and then to Germany. He was raised and considered his hometown to be Abilene, Kansas. Eisenhower was known for being politically non-involved for most of his life as an army officer. Despite being friends, he would actively clash professionally with Patton, especially near the end of the fiery Southerner’s career. When he finally became president, he would have a warm relationship with the South due to the recent betrayal by President Truman and the false belief in his Dixian identity. Indeed, many Southerners viewed Eisenhower as a likely ally due to his more conservative nature, military experience, and background. At first, Eisenhower was and would do very little to aid Yankee politicians in ending segregation and home rule in Dixie. When Brown v. Board came in 1954, Ike only timidly embraced it, it seemed to many that he was a solid ally of the South. A prime example of Ike being seen as a moderate is when Texas Governor Allan Shivers blocked integration in 1956 with the Texas Rangers. Ike refused to step in, and was often attacked by Yankee leftist at the time. This seeming indifference and personal assistance played a part in Ike once again winning Texas that year, along with breaking Louisiana off from the Solid South.

However, in 1957, this cozy relationship would end and become clear during the standoff in Little Rock, Arkansas. After seeing the actions of Shivers the year prior, Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus was inspired and pushed by Southern voters to stop integration in their beautiful capital city. Faubus decided to send in the Arkansas National Guard to block integration and keep the peace. Ike, at first, was hesitant to step in until the media began sending television recordings of (rightfully) angry Arkansans opposing black students from breaking into their schools. Ike and many “moderates” in the Midlands fell over themselves and felt “opposition had gone too far.” They ignored the fact that the Supreme Court had violated its role in Brown v. Board. Despite being a supposed conservative, Ike in a move all too familiar to modern Southern voters condemned and betrayed the South.

Eisenhower was moved by his wishy-washy emotions and blind obedience in “law and order” much in the same way modern Republicans fell over themselves in the aftermath of Jan 6th to condemn their own voters for rejecting a stolen election. Ike sent in federal boots with the 101st Airborne Division to occupy Little Rock. He would air a speech demanding Southerners fall in line with “law and judges.” During the occupation of Little Rock, the federal troopers would beat and roughhouse local Southerners opposing the hostile takeover of their education system. Southerners, at the time, would cover photos of conflict, which were often hidden by the national press at time, and would lose trust in the Republican Party, as well as Eisenhower.

In the aftermath of this, Dixie would split in the 1960 election, with Louisiana and Texas flipping away from the Republican Party by voting for Nixon. The states of Alabama and Mississippi would vote for Virginia Senator Harry F. Byrd, rejecting the two-party option.

To get back to the point, it should be clear to any Southern Nationalist that Midlanders are incompatible with the South. Their track record shows them to be fair weather friends at best, and enemies at worst. Our modern times reflect this, with Pennsylvanians bolting to vote for Biden in 2020, thus bringing in the immigration crisis, inflation, and the theft of millions of dollars to Ukraine. Dixie united with them in 2016 to stop Hillary, only to have them flip flop to Joe Biden. To make matters worse, these people (Midlanders in Pennsylvania) elected a Democratic governor and senator (the one who wears a hoodie to Congress) in 2022. While many will claim these elections were stolen, as someone who has studied this state and its people, it seems clear to me that the Midlanders of Pennsylvania view Republicans as too “extreme.”

All polls at the moment have Pennsylvania as the closest swing state, with some occasionally having Biden still barely winning. I, for one, would no longer like to see my national elections decided by this nation of undecided “moderates.” Southern Nationalists: be ready for Pennsylvania, the main state of the Midlanders, to disappoint the MAGA movement in November when they decide Trump is “too radical and dangerous.” It is my hope that, after that, the Southern people will see that we need to cut all political ties with such milquetoast folks.

Dixie is better off without having the Midlands decide our fate.

-By Dixie Anon

The post Legacy of Midlander and Dixie Relations appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

There are ways to solve a nation’s problem with drugs. As Saddam Hussein once remarked, wherever there’s a problem, there’s a person. Thus, every leader who has solved these problems goes after the people behind them. Chairman Mao solved China’s opium crisis overnight by rounding up all the dealers for execution and the addicts for political reeducation, for example.

Indeed, there are a set of precedents which demonstrate that people must be dealt with harshly if a problem with drugs is to be solved. That’s why it’s so exasperating to hear the claim that we’ll never keep people from doing drugs. Actually, we can do precisely that if the drug dealers are dead and the addicts are forced to labor in concentration camps.

This is why it’s terrific to see that America is producing serious thinkers capable of grasping practical solutions to our national drug crisis like giving the addicts free kits for sticking the drugs up their asses once injecting their arms gets to be too troublesome.

"I always recommend people try boofing."

Watch as Maine's "harm reduction" experts opine on the virtues of sticking fentanyl up your butt. pic.twitter.com/qZymOMWLod

— The Maine Wire (@TheMaineWire) June 11, 2024

It makes sense from the perspective that we live a dying country which has made sodomy its primary value. So, sticking things up one’s ass is the first idea that probably pops from the heads of many Americans:

The boofing kit contained two anal injectors, six packets of lubricant, some sterilizing wipes, and two tins for mixing a rectal cocktail.

The Bangor-based MAP has even more detailed tips for the would-be boofer, including to use a smaller syringe if you can so as not to overtax your sphincter.

It’s really important not to overtax your sphincter, that’s why tax dollars are spent on these anal injectors. Let’s read on:

Although they acknowledge that it’s better to not have blood come out of your butt after you’ve squirted narcotics into your anus, they urge boof-curious viewers not to “freak out” if there’s only a small amount of post-boofing anal bleeding.

There’s probably not much that’s going to freak out someone with a fentanyl habit which has gotten so bad they’re injecting it into their anus, but I suppose it’s a kind concern on the part of Maine Access Points. When addicts start dying on sidewalks with their pants down, nobody will try to hold this organization accountable. Of that much we can be certain.

A taxpayer-funded group in Maine is using trendy and hip marketing materials to encourage the practice of sticking heroin, fentanyl, or meth up your butt. pic.twitter.com/821vJM2dUn

— The Maine Wire (@TheMaineWire) June 11, 2024

Has it ever once occurred to you that if someone has an intravenous drug habit, this person should stick the drugs up his ass instead? Probably not, which is why you’re considered an extremist threat to our national security.

It seems quintessentially American to assume that we can’t fix our dug epidemic and then conclude that the addicts should be sticking these drugs up their asses as a way to mitigate this problem. I can’t say I’m surprised to come across this news.

The post A Reasonable Recommendation appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

After various iterations of what y’all know as Identity Dixie, WE ARE STILL HERE! Unlike our enemies, there have been no layoffs; we have expanded like a raging fire through a dried pine forest! We are in it, to win it! And even our critics know the wind is in our favor.

For nine years, this insignificant little blog has influenced hundreds of thousands of people around the globe. I’m constantly amazed when I hear a phrase, see a meme, hear a song, or read a post by another influencer in the mainstream political zeitgeist that mimics ID content from years ago. We are small, but we know how to use force multipliers like no other.

Just as I have predicted over the years, we would grow, our writers would get younger, and our older writers would gladly pass the torch to the next generation when the time was right. Although that time is not now, our writers are reflecting the generation that will be instrumental in maintaining order in our communities when the American empire fades into history. Our ancestors bred us, trained us, and left us the tools to carry on their valiant fight against a Christ-less tyranny.

Christian Nationalism is on the rise, and nothing will stop it. The greatest missionary field in the United States is disaffected, young, White men, many with military experience, and especially those with young families. They long for real culture, something tangible they can pass down to their children… and they are coming our way. Not only are they embracing what has always been the culture of the Southern people, but they are flocking to our lands in great numbers. Their arrival presents us with a necessary opportunity. They must embrace our history, totally rejecting any thought of restoring an America that never existed. I’m positive the coming election will present a crucial moment with these men, and we must seize upon it.

I had a brief conversation last Lord’s Day with a very connected official in my state. The conversation went as usual with true Southern cordial greetings, followed by “Where are you from and who are your people?” This brother is a native, with a long history in our state; he knows people, and he knows what is coming. We debated the pragmatism of our politicians, and we agreed that this strategy must come to an end. My exhortation was that we must encourage our leaders to be bolder, for we live not in a time for the timid, but in a time for warriors and prophets.

Over the years, this blog has expounded many different strategies with the same goal: an Independent Dixie. Brothers and sisters, there is no one way, no one path to victory. As in all warfare, ID is dynamic, and the content you receive, and hopefully spread among our people, is multifaceted. Let’s continue to engage, bringing the fire to those who would destroy our people.

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post Nine Years! No Layoffs! appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

On August 5, 1914, one of the most significant events of the Great War occurred. It was not a major battle, but rather the cutting of undersea cables at the German port of Emden by the British ship Alert. From that point on, Germany lost its most important avenue to securely communicate outside of Europe, especially with the United States. This is important because very quickly the Allies launched a libelous campaign against Germany, one that accused her of violating the very basic assumptions of Christian morality and conduct during a war. Wild stories, such as allegations that German soldiers were playing a game of throwing Belgian infants into the air and attempting to catch them with their bayonets, or that Germans were crucifying kittens on church doors, or that Germans were intentionally using poison gas on civilians soon flooded the United States. Long before Germany lost the Great War, she lost the public relations war. It was only after the war’s end and more critical eyes were able to examine the actual evidence did these stories fall apart.

To be sure, there were some atrocities committed by the German military. It’s war – horrible things are bound to happen, hence why the teaching by the Christian Church that war should be used only as a last resort. It is also true that the American elites were predisposed to support the Triple Entente. The elites of the United States have traditionally been divided between Anglophiles and Francophiles – see the rivalry between the Anglophile John Adams and the Francophile Thomas Jefferson. It was a divide so deep it even split the individual nations that make up the United States. The Great War saw the unification of these two factions, with the American elites consolidating behind the Entente. At the time of the Great War, those that supported the Central Powers, like the Germans who wanted to see their Fatherland triumphant and the Irish who wished for their ancient enemy to be humiliated, were not powerful enough to push the United States into the direction of the Central Powers. But it remains true that the all-out character assassination of Germany played a major part in pushing the United States into the war.

Today, we very much live in a similar world as it was during the Great War – the flow of information has been greatly restricted and the elites are able to bend public will to suit their own needs. Those who they support are brave freedom fighters, while those who oppose them are evil. One of the primary areas this can be observed, and certainly one of the most relevant in light of current events, is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For years, we have received stories of nonviolent Jews trying to make peace with their evil and barbaric Muslim neighbors. The context of the horrible treatment of Palestinians by the Israelis is completely ignored. The Christian population of Palestine is rendered invisible. While their co-religionists in the United States praise “our greatest ally,” Palestinian Christians find themselves hated in their own land, being spat upon, being prevented from exercising their religion, having their cemeteries desecrated, and even being murdered. This is all being done by the very people whom many of their fellow Christians have turned their support of into a matter of dogma.

Nationalists face much of the same problems. Because our enemies control the flow of information, their propaganda dominates. The media is able to spin a very peculiar story – one of hate-filled White supremacists dreaming of murdering non-Whites against peace-loving newcomers who simply want to culturally enrich their new homes with a trendy restaurant. The reality is far different, and would create new nationalists, if it were allowed to be told. It is the dark side of immigration. It is a story of increased crime and lowered wages. It also comes down to one basic question: should Whites become minorities in their own homelands? There’s a reasonable answer to that question, but not to the most deranged, anti-White leftists; however, because of the control of information, it’s something that remains untold. Much like Germany in the Great War, nationalists can be defamed with total impunity and have no real way of fighting back. No matter how outlandish the propaganda is, it will be believed by a significant amount of the population because there is nothing to counter it.

This is where the internet comes in. The internet has, in essence, rebuilt the cables and allowed for the other side of the story to be told. Although shut out of the traditional media, thanks to the internet, the plight of Palestinians, particularly Palestinian Christians, can now be told. Thanks to the internet, nationalists can now show the world that we are far from Hollywood Nazi caricatures the media wishes to portray us as. And that is why the elites are so frantically trying to regulate it. After Unite the Right, the media painted the picture of peaceful anti-racists protesters against deranged Nazis out for blood. It is no coincidence that at that moment, the Old Wild West days of the internet ended in favor of the sanitized, regulated internet. Without a major crackdown, the other side of the story could be told and the regime narrative would fall apart. But, eventually, the internet worked around this, and the old behemoths went into decline with new fronts opening up. Globohomo was able to get Facebook and YouTube to play along. They cannot make Telegram, Gab, or TikTok do the same. This is why they went after Elon Musk – he allows non-approved ideas on Twitter (X), a platform that was once firmly in their control.

The desire to recut the cables is the reason for the TikTok ban attempts. I do not like TikTok and think it has utterly destroyed a generation of young White women. But, that is not why our overlords are trying to ban it. If that were the case, there are plenty of other platforms they would ban instead. Rather, TikTok is being targeted because they refuse to remove pro-Palestinian content and have created a generational revolt against the pro-Israel monopoly. Remember, even in the post-Wild West age, we have been able to make great strides now that cables have been rebuilt. The pro-Israel consensus is now over; it is just a matter of time before the younger generation takes over and U.S. policy changes. Israel knows this, and is now moving towards China. They know the days they can count on infinite American support are over. The next generation of Christians, even Evangelicals, no longer views support for Israel as a matter of dogma. Ideas like a second Dixian secession or the Great Replacement are no longer fringe ideas.

None of this would have been plausible ten or even five years ago, and the elites trying to put Humpty Dumpty back together again is a fool’s errand. You can bet that the college student of 2024 will not forget being threatened with permanent unemployment for speaking out against genocide of the Palestinian people. You can bet that the young White man will not forget being threatened with debanking for thinking that Whites should not become a minority in their own land. Much like the honest historians who were able to examine the actual evidence against Germany after Versailles, a paradigm shift is underway.

The post Cutting the Cables appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

For many conservatives in the United States and some abroad, the reaction to Donald Trump’s conviction in NYC has been some variant of the phrase, ‘This is unprecedented in US history.’ To which we must reply that this simply is not the case.

But citizens of the States are notoriously illiterate of history. There is a reason for this, which we will touch on later. But for the moment it is necessary to recite some of the precedents in US history for the weaponized court conviction of Donald Trump.

First up is the Whiskey Rebellion, which occurred in western Pennsylvania. It was more or less a replay of the colonists’ rebellion against the British tax on tea, except this time it was small farmers and producers rebelling against a federal tax on whiskey, implemented in 1791.

Pres. Jefferson helped repeal the hated taxes in 1802, but the hypocrisy of the whole affair is palpable: The very people who used a tea tax to agitate a war for independence from Great Britain were quick to squelch a similar maneuver from being used by the poor working-class folk of western Pennsylvania via the new federal government’s overwhelming military force. That was an ominous beginning for the plain folk of the States (i.e., the same type of people who are now ardent Trump supporters, who are facing the same type of punitive measures by their elite) under their new federal constitution, written and ratified just a few years earlier in 1787-8. But more disturbing actions were to come.

The Alien and Sedition Acts were passed during the Adams administration in 1798, and bear an incredibly strong resemblance to what Mr. Trump is undergoing in NYC. Under these Acts, criticism of the federal government became a treasonous crime that could be punished by fines or a jail sentence. Benjamin Franklin’s grandson was charged under the act, dying before his trial, but the case of Rep. Matthew Lyon is so similar to Mr. Trump’s that it deserves special notice:

A sitting member of Congress even found himself caught up in the web spun by the Sedition Act. Matthew Lyon represented Vermont in Congress and also served as the editor of the Republican paper The Scourge of Aristocracy. During his re-election campaign, Lyon wrote a reply to his Federalist opponents, accusing President Adams of engaging in a “continual grasp for power” and of having “an unbounded thirst for ridiculous pomp, foolish adulation, and selfish avarice.” He also blasted the president for using religion to drum up war against France, writing he could not support the executive, “when I shall see the sacred name of religion employed as a state engine to make mankind hate.”

Lyon was indicted on sedition charges on Oct. 5, 1798, and arrested the next day. A federal judge fined Lyon $1,000 and sentenced him to four months in prison. (4) He served time in a 16′ x 12′ cell used for felons, counterfeiters, thieves, and runaway slaves. Judge William Paterson – an avid nationalist and supporter of the Federalist Party – lamented the fact he couldn’t impose a harsher sentence.

Lyon won reelection while in jail by a landslide.

Will Trump also win re-election ‘by a landslide?’ Leftists ought to pause to reflect on what their actions may bring about.

Nevertheless, the Alien and Sedition Acts also expired under Jefferson’s administration. One might think by these acts that Jefferson’s years as president would be bright with the light of liberty, but he also abused federal power. His embargo measures during the Napoleonic wars in Europe were a cause of much hardship in New England, bringing the commerce of her great shipping fleet to a standstill. State governments rebelled, refusing to cooperate with federal officials tasked with enforcing them, and smuggling became widespread (full details are provided in J. J. Kilpatrick’s The Sovereign States).

These embargo acts would eventually be repealed, but other federal embargo laws would continue to stir up strife in New England through the War of 1812, culminating in the pro-secession Hartford Convention of 1814.

It is telling that callous, repressive measures by the political elite were committed even by Pres. Jefferson, one of the presidents most friendly towards the ideals of the Enlightenment/classical liberalism. This makes the actions of Pres. Lincoln, who was the opposite of Mr. Jefferson – a Cromwellian figure, in fact, per Prof. Mel Bradford – all the more predictable. Pres. Lincoln launched a war to prevent peaceful Southern secession (the falsely named ‘Civil War’ of 1861-5), and his actions during that war are amongst some of the worst by a government of the US against its citizens. Some of the most egregious include the jailing of upwards of 30,000 citizens of the Northern States, deporting Ohio’s Rep. Vallandigham for opposing an income tax, silencing hundreds of newspapers, and intimidating voters.

Other notable parts of this pattern of precedents include the violent, corrupt federal Reconstruction of the South, which followed the War; the assassination of Pres. Kennedy (1963), likely at the behest of his Vice President Lyndon Johnson, among other characters; and the Ruby Ridge killings by the FBI (1992).

What conservatives saw in a NYC courtroom on May 30th, 2024, shouldn’t have startled them so badly. Things equally bad, and things much worse, have been done by their governmental elite in the past. But, as we noted above, the historical amnesia of the peoples of the States precludes this. And the cause of this forgetfulness transcends in importance the foolish and immoral acts of this or that administration or official.

That cause is the very thing upon which they pride themselves so highly: American exceptionalism. The freedom of the individual to chart his own destiny (the main aspect of American exceptionalism) necessarily means the severing of ties to the past and ties to community – for one to truly become ‘anything he wants to be,’ all restraints must be removed, however benevolent they may seem, including the most basic duties to one’s religion, family and neighborhood, history, class, culture, and even one’s own sex.

This hyper-individualism of theirs also leaves them vulnerable to the thing they dread the most: a tyrannical, lawless government. Because they are so busy pursuing their own individual dreams of happiness, they haven’t got enough solidarity either with their ancestors of the past or with their neighbors of the present, with whom they could potentially join to defend themselves against such a government.

Memories of forefathers would make a marked difference in conservative responses to the Trump trial trainwreck. Instead of apocalyptic dread and furious anger, they would have a calmer, more sober demeanor as they placed this event in a broader context, remembering that great-grandfather, etc., also faced their share of difficulties, but were able to endure and overcome – and they would know that they could do likewise, with God’s help.

For Dixie, the exploits of their ancestors in their war against the Northern invaders would be especially powerful and uplifting if they would recall them.

With valiant deeds like these in mind, who would be overly vexed by a petty district attorney in NYC trying to stir up trouble?

The same is even more true of our fathers in the Christian Faith. A holy patron like St. Sava for the Serbian people is a deep wellspring of inspiration, answering the cries of their fellow countrymen for help countless times over the years.

The ethnic groups of the cultural regions of the US have patrons of this sort – the southeastern English of Yankee New England have St. Botolph (+680), for whom Boston (Botolph’s Town) is named, and St. Edmund, the martyr-king of East Anglia (+869); the southwestern and northern English of Dixie have St. Alfred the Great (+899), king of Wessex, St. Cuthbert of Lindisfarne (+687), the Wonderworker of All England, and much more recently Blessed Dmitri of Dallas (+2011); the Africans of Dixie have St. Anthony the Great (+356) and St. Moses the Black (+400); the Germans and Scandinavians of the Great Plains have St. Ansgar of Bremen (+865), a wonderful missionary, and St. Olaf of Norway (+1030), another martyr-king; and so on. But the disdain of the typical American toward the past prevents him from befriending any of them.

Treasuring their ties to their mother-countries would aid the peoples of the States in recovering a healthy attitude toward their ancestors. It is more than a little reassuring, then, to see Louisiana, for instance, encouraging French language immersion in her public schools, along with other efforts to strengthen her ties to France and French culture.

The South more broadly, as the region most respectful of tradition in the union of States, has a strong history of doing this very thing. Open a biography of a notable Southerner (Gen. J.E.B. Stuart, Rev. Robert Lewis Dabney, and so on), and one will find more often than not a genealogy of his family, tracing his roots back to his home country across the Atlantic. These are examples from which all the States could benefit.

Thus, conservatives of the US are faced with a choice: They can continue down their ‘exceptional’ path of excessive individualism, which helps to empower the very tyranny they despise, or they can return to the ‘normal’ world of Christendom, their links to which were gravely weakened when they began their experiment in post-Christian, Enlightenment liberty in 1776.

They will find that tradition and historical knowledge empower and enrich; too much focus on the individual and his present wants and desires, enervates. If they will combine a love for tradition and history with the valuable institutions and practices that they still retain (the Christian Church, the family, political power dispersed amongst many centers and levels, common law, private and public schools, etc.), they will reduce the number and severity of tyrannical outbursts of their elite, and, if any should arise, they will not be quite as discombobulated as they find themselves at present over the Alvin Bragg inquisition of Donald Trump, but will instead be better situated to mount a meaningful and coherent response.

-By Walt Garlington

The post Putting Trump’s Conviction in Historical Perspective appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’ve never used my company’s funds to pay for hookers. But, lemme tell ya, this a common practice although the expense isn’t usually listed as “hooker.” How does someone imagine that a businessman is paying for hookers? With a check? Do you think he signs an invoice with “blowjob” written on it? That money is being withdrawn at 2:00AM via an ATM transaction that his wife will see on her phone?

The level of naïveté professed from conservative outlets in America is so tiresome. In most other countries, everyone just knows this is what’s going on and doesn’t try to put on some act about how they’re shocked and outraged to the extent these matters even get brought up at all. Just because everybody knows about something doesn’t make it a matter of public discourse.

Also, I wouldn’t go on a crack binge while recording my manic escapades with these hookers. However, I get that if this is one’s preoccupation, why not go for broke and record everything? Moreover, we’ve all been to junior high school. If a girl is putting on some act about how irritated or outraged she is about a guy, this fixation clearly indicates she’s into him.

She really likes showing various photos of Hunter banging hookers. The fact that Hunter Biden kept getting away with everything simply turned Marjorie Taylor Greene on even more. The fact that he wouldn’t even give her the time of day and clearly wasn’t into her at all drove this woman wild. It’s pretty funny, and we’ve got to find our laughs where we can.

Hunter Biden traffics women for sex but ran away when I was recognized to speak to him.

The only women Hunter Biden likes to deal with are the women he hires for sex, flies across the country, films and photos his disgusting porn with, and post his nasty videos on porn sites.… pic.twitter.com/ps9C5u1fv3

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG) January 10, 2024

None of the other congresspeople seem interested in these “nasty videos.” Hmm……I’d also like to point out that in more sane eras basically everywhere on the planet, it wasn’t considered appropriate for women to participate in public life. So, nobody had to be harangued by female legislators about a businessman’s prostitute consumption.

Hunter Biden was recently convicted for writing on a federal form that he didn’t have a drug problem when he purchased a gun. I’m not sure if I just summed the case up correctly, but this is what I can surmise from the coverage. Fine, whatever, he got convicted of whatever. It might not even be serious enough for any prison time.

What’s irritating is how badly everything is going wrong while conservatives try to market this as some sort of victory, or worse yet, evidence that a grand conspiracy will soon be exposed. We had to go through that during the Trump years.

At least with Hunter Biden, it’s all easy to grasp. He likes to party and live dangerously. Hookers, crack, banging his deceased brother’s wife and getting her addicted to crack, playing with pistols, impregnating strippers, driving to Vegas at over 100 MPH. That sort of thing.

His father is important, and he had lots of corrupt money to burn, so he was able to take things much further than most. It’s incredible that he’s survived into his fifties, most men on this course end up dead or in jail long before his age.

This crackhead is supposed to be a CIA asset in some sort of diabolical scheme? He was too strung out to remember to even pick up his own computer from a repair shop. Please.

To be honest, I prefer criminals like Hunter Biden whose motives are essentially stereotypical. This I can understand and it in no way disturbs my understanding of the world like forced genetic injections and kids delivered in cabinets. Take this proud black woman, for example:

ROGUE DA’S: Atlanta prosecutor
Shelitha Robertson, 62, is jailed for stealing $15 million of Paycheck Protection Program & using the cash to buy diamond rings and a Rolls Royce. U.S. District Judge Grimberg said the loss of millions was staggering. https://t.co/OHZnJZWi47

— Blue Lives Matter (@RetiredNYCPD) June 9, 2024

The Daily Mail deserves an award for bestowing the most generous descriptions on black people of any publication. Currently, I serve as my county’s (deputy) dog catcher. Although I’m one election cycle away from the big seat, I don’t have access to much of anything worth stealing and I doubt the sumbitch standing between me and high office does, either. Moreover, theft is against my code of professional ethics and beneath my level of genteel refinement. I’ve never even once used the n-word, let alone pilfered a cent from the government.

If I was using my public service to enrich myself however, I’d be exercising more discretion than a pimp from the colored community, particularly if I was from the colored community.

How long can a public servant drive around wearing diamond rings in a Rolls Royce before suspicions start to arise? It’s one thing to buy a condo down in Boca under your cousin’s name or something like that, but the stereotypes have to play themselves out. Like I said, I take comfort in these stereotypes.

If the government is offering free money in a place like America, obviously this is going to result in massive amounts of fraud. It was already hemorrhaging billions in various facile schemes long before COVID. The thing about achieving success in fraud is that the paper trail shouldn’t lead directly back to yourself, which is why black people are encountering big trouble now that there’s time to review all the paperwork that was rubber stamped during the fake pandemic.

This is an element of orientating oneself towards future consequences that black people just can’t master and that’s why the free COVID money has hit them so hard. If you can’t even show up to the polls with a photo ID to vote, it logically follows that you also lack the wherewithal to utilize a suitable fake identity when defrauding the government. Bias confirmed. In this regard, COVID must be considered a resounding success.

Your Card Has Been Activated

For example, during COIVD, a pair of rappers not only defrauded the government, they also produced a rap video about their specific criminal endeavors which they uploaded to YouTube, leading to their apprehension by the authorities at the mansion used in the video, which had been rented with their ill-gotten gains.

I wrote about it at the time because I found the boastful lyric ““you gotta sell cocaine, I just file a claim” to be rather amusing and sound from a criminal standpoint. Most rap I hear while waiting for the light to change at intersections doesn’t seem to make any sense whatsoever, so I’ll confess to enjoying this particular tune.

Anyways, let’s read a bit more about the “glamorous prosecutor“:

What she said in the loan documents was extraordinary, claiming she had a workforce of more than 400, meaning she was entitled to millions of dollars in handouts for each of the companies she claimed to run.

Alright, so if anyone spent 5 minutes looking through the documents filed in your own name, then you’re busted for millions of dollars in fraud. By contrast, hooker payments can be buried anywhere under an infinite number of plausible legitimate expenses. Remember, this woman was a glamorous prosecutor:

U.S. District Judge Steven D. Grimberg said the loss of the $14 million in funds was staggering.

‘It was her level of direction and confidence in being able to commit this level of fraud without being detected that instigated it in the first place,’ Grimberg said in court.

‘Motivated by greed, Robertson deceptively obtained funds that were designated to provide emergency financial relief to struggling small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic,’ said U.S. Attorney Ryan K. Buchanan. ‘

‘It was her level of direction and confidence in being able to commit this level of fraud without being detected that instigated it in the first place,’ Grimberg said in court.

Um, she’s black. When a black guy robs a gas station on camera does the judge condemn his “level of direction and confidence in pointing the pistol at the clerk’s face” as the reason he did it? The motive is as simple as a hunter-gatherer plucking fruit from a tree without any thought as to why the tree exists.

She wasn’t pondering possible outcomes, duh. It’s like trying to discern some scheme behind the motivations of somebody who killed 1 person and wounded 14 by shooting into the crowd at a rap concert. So, this happened and it will continue to happen.

Time is a flat circle, the stereotypes chart its course.

The post Soothing Stereotypes appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Leftists are terrified of Christians enforcing a proper morality on society.

Yet, they seem to have missed the fact that our society already has a state-mandated religion, it’s just not a Christian one:

The leftist is not truly against a state-mandated religion/morality/worldview—They just don’t want it to be the True one.

For a society to exist, it must have a state-mandated morality. That morality is captured through the laws of the society. It’s the very cultural essence of a society.

Our leftist elites just pretend it does not exist, even though they are the priests of such a religion.

The anarchists, libertarians, and leftists do not like to admit it, but there is no escaping a state-enforced “religion”. We always have and always will have one. It is required for a state to exist.

We once used Christianity in this country. Now, we use the leftist egalitarian-Enlightenment religion.

There is no condition where a society exists without a consensual moral foundation built upon a system of belief. Call it what you want: Religion, Globohomo, or “philosophy”, I don’t care. It all serves the same function and acts as a religion for the masses. It becomes a religion to its adherents.

Thus, we can use the Christian religion, or we can use the leftist, BLM kneeling, homo-worshipping, white-person hating, one.

You choose.

The post State-Mandated Religion: Leftist Fears Versus Reality appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I just read a few minutes ago that Hunter Biden’s jury in his trial had found him guilty on all the counts he had been charged with, and it only took them three hours to do so.

I must admit, I am surprised. I figured with Biden being his last name it would have been an automatic acquittal, especially in Delaware. The judge will deal with the sentencing at a later date. The maximum sentence for the three counts he was tried for is 25 years.

I can hardly picture anyone named Biden going to the slammer for that amount of time. Those kinds of things don’t happen in “our democracy.” If his last name had been Trump, then I could picture the maximum sentence being imposed, but not for a Biden or a Clinton or any of their elite buddies. Those people don’t do jail time or, if they do, it’s the bare minimum – just enough so they can claim they’ve paid their debt to society.

So, we’ll see what sentence the judge imposes when the time comes, whether it’s something substantial or something that won’t amount to a hill of beans. In all honesty, I expect the latter and I will be really surprised if it’s the former. I’d love to be wrong, and it wouldn’t be the first time. But, based on past performances with the political elites, I can’t see any Biden or Clinton, no matter how egregious their crimes are, remotely being called on in this life to pay for those crimes.

Watching over 50 years of political chicanery has made me a thoroughgoing pessimist when it comes to political culprits paying for their sins.

So, we’ll see when Hunter’s sentencing time rolls around.

-By Al Benson Jr.

The post Hunter Biden Found Guilty – What a Surprise! appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Classical foreign policy, what most would describe as non-interventionism, is the most defensive and, therefore, the most defensible policy. There should be no foreign policy (as opposed to trade policy) towards nations a state is not actively at war with. The byproduct of having a foreign policy with a state that a nation is not actively at war with is that nation will be at war, largely through 4th generation means (terrorism from non-state actors within our own borders).

We all learn in school that WWI was caused by nationalism (despite the aftermath causing far more casualties) and entangling alliances. The unspoken reality behind entangling alliances is that they constitute a foreign policy, namely the ally state’s foreign policy. Much of the Islamic world has been candid in confessing that they view the United States’ entangling alliance with Israel as casus belli for war with the United States.

Equally bad, possibly worse, is entangling antagonism. Meddling in Syria against its sovereign government will get you instability in Syria at best, and retaliation from Syrian actors and their allies abroad at worst. Lest instability in Syria seem like a cheap price, the growth of ISIS depended heavily on this instability. ISIS perpetrated various attacks in the West, most notably the 2015 Paris attacks culminating in 131 casualties (not counting the attackers).

Under the Pax Americana, the world has seen no World Wars, but has seen no end of minor conflicts abroad and domestically. In Rome, they had a temple to Janus, who presided over the beginning and end of conflicts. When at peace, the doors were closed. When at war, they opened up. In Imperial Rome, the gates stood always ajar. Just so, since America became the world leader in both the UN and global dominance, the gates have always remained open. Since 1989, when the United States became the sole superpower (with Russia and China to emerge later), America took the metaphorical doors off the hinges.

Global Affairs counted the number of nations where the U.S. officially maintains active military installations at 80 (as of April 2024). Of the ever-shifting number of 195 official countries, this constitutes roughly 41%. This, of course, doesn’t include clandestine emplacements operated by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Special Operations Command (SOCOM). One can only estimate, but one could safely conjecture the number would approach 95%. If the sun never set on the British Empire, the US “unmpire” doesn’t miss a single time zone. The snarkier reader will note that UTC-12 or Yankee in Military Time Group (MTG) is uninhabited, but the area contains Baker Island. Baker Island, roughly halfway between Hawaii and Australia, is a U.S. territory.

The British had their share of instability during their tenure as the lead global superpower, not the least in the revolt of the United States, but these seem small, brief, and infrequent compared to the continual conflict across the globe today. During the Pax Britannica (1815-1914, roughly), Europe enjoyed 99 years of peace. People might point out that no major powers have entered a state of war in almost 100 years, if one doesn’t count stabbings, bombings, truck attacks, and the occasional arena-massacre. However, the list of places in the Balkans that had to change their names during the 90’s would challenge the notion of “peace in Europe.” Along with the Transnistria War and now the massive conflict in Ukraine, the Pax Americana only managed 46 years of peace.

To summarize, Europe has had sectarian wars that required the superpowers to dogpile the identified belligerents, a massive war egged on by the U.S. State Department and tacitly and grudgingly supported (with the notable exception of an enthusiastic UK) by European superpowers, and domestic instability and escalating crime rates that have made people reluctant to walk the streets of their own cities for the past 30 years. That was the supposed benefit of global hegemony by consensus under the UN and “global trade,” which means the U.S. and its financial interests. This benefit was supposed to offset the list of regional brushfires and open wars that resulted from twin policies of nations abandoning their colonies and the U.S. attempting to maintain soft control over them through monetary and diplomatic endeavors. “Diplomatic and monetary endeavors” may be shortened to “monetary endeavors” as all diplomacy begins and ends with “if you want financial aid.”

How do we let the tiger go without getting mauled? We cease any and all foreign aid. We maintain military bases as necessary to ensure the safety of international trade against piracy. We deport any and all who have a problem with the cessation of cashflow to their benighted place of origin which they fled in desperation. We cease poking competitor-states in the eye and daring them to do something about it.

The reason BRICS appeals to many nations is how relatively hands-off Russia and China are in their administration. The vassal states don’t have to worry about observing the correct victim month at their embassies or feigning support for vastly unpopular positions among their populace. They’re willing to take a pay-cut to be left alone. So, let’s leave them alone. We will secure the resources we require through trade. If the owners of the resources are unwilling to sell them, we will make do with what we have or we will go to war for them. But the war will be declared and conducted by the full will of the populace, and our nation will be able to justify it based on merit of argument. At the very least, the transparency of invading for resources would be a welcome and refreshing change from the tired lie of “bringing democracy.”

The post A Return to Sanity appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I recently reread Victoria: A Novel of 4th Generation War by William S. Lind. He published it under the name Thomas Hobbes. I can’t really recommend it as it’s eye-rolling in its premise and plot and the dialogue is trite. You can tell which characters are Mary-Sue stand-ins for Lind and the people he cares for in his life. To call the book an “analogical allegory” is to give it too much credit. Indeed, its page on TV Tropes is impressive in its length given the relative brevity of the book. The book is amusing at times, even though it’s so “on the nose” it may as well be one of those dumpster fire doorknocker bull-rings women have become obsessed with wearing in their septums. I must confess, I like the book because of the people who hate it.

In the book, the chief stand-in for Lind, Bill Kraft, espouses a taste for “retro-culture.” He owns nothing made after 1965. The New England states all eventually adopt this and go further back in their restrictions to the 1930s. The idea espoused is that technology has dehumanized people and is a root-cause for a lot of social problems, if not all of them. This puts the cart squarely before the horse.

All of the arguments Lind attempts to use for retro-culture in Victoria, which is indeed an ideology, are arbitrary. Ideologies are condemned by Kraft in the book in very strict terms and, when challenged that retro-culture is an ideology, he makes an uncompelling argument that it’s merely “returning to a saner way of life.” He argues television is a cause, much less a necessary precondition, for filth and Marxism. One could equally argue the Gutenberg press was a cause for Jehovah’s Witnesses or even Lady Chatterley’s Lover and the subsequent obscenities foisted on mankind.

Technology certainly enables laxity and provides a cloak to societal decay, but people seem to have a strange fetish for wanting to pause technological innovation at the level they are most nostalgic for, extending to periods they never personally experienced. I do agree that there are technologies that are not neutral in their uses. Prophylactics are a great example. So is gain-of-function research. We should prohibit evil knowledge.

It seems to me that a better answer to the media conundrum is a “league of decency.” We had one and produced some of the best cinema ever made. Our society imposed its moral sensibilities onto the creative industry and we received good art in exchange, and subversion remained banished to the outskirts of acceptable society.

In the book, Lind also laments that long-range vehicles destroy a sense of community that forms in areas where people do not travel often or far (he argues media compounds this). The problem is, he’s again putting the cart before the horse. In traditional small towns and in cities, families often had long-range cars and still knew and visited their neighbors. I grew up in the suburbs and was hardly alienated. That came later. It wasn’t technology. It had more to do with what Robert Putnam grudgingly discovered in Bowling Alone.

Social alienation is certainly exacerbated by technology, but it’s caused by a lack of trust and other products of the growing dysmorphia between reality and the reality dictated by conventional sources via forced-consensus. Isolation, narcissism, and alienation don’t pour out of media. We pour ourselves into media because of isolation, narcissism, and alienation.

The rootlessness of the modern United States is due to economic and crime patterns. Given the collapse of the job market due to outsourcing, insourcing, and, to an overstated extent, automation, people have abandoned long-time family homelands. A society of strangers without the trust or warmth to make new bonds will quickly devolve into alienation. The military has to make concerted efforts to force strangers into communities due to the nature of duty stations and transfers. The real struggle is in rebuilding communities rather than some great technological evil.

Moreover, the reason your television beams in evil is because evil people are behind the beam. One could equally lament how the record and the radio destroyed live music. Why stop at the 1930s (this author reflected and placed “19” before “30’s” as it occurs to him that we will shortly be in the 2030s and whatever dread that holds for us)? Because Lind is making some unprincipled exceptions. I don’t think any society in the 1930s had the level of piety, earthiness, and community of the 1030s. Ought we tear off our roofing and replace it with thatch? If it’s an argument of inconvenience, no. Is 1930s retro-culture an exception on the convenience of the level of technology the author feels he can live with comfortably? It seems so.

I’m afraid the answer lies in discipline in discernment. These two things are particularly difficult for people, and they have become more difficult. One remembers the common refrain in Judges, “And every man did what was right in his own eyes.” Yes, there must be standards. No, they will not always be clear. Discernment and discipline require constant energy and attention.

If you read your Bible, you’re no stranger to this notion. Salvation isn’t a “fire-and-forget” concept. Our Founding Fathers thought the Constitution would preserve the core of the country they founded and prevent all gross perversion and the descent into “democracy.” Rules and laws only have effect inasmuch as the people have a will to enforce them. The rules have faded, and we have people arguing ridiculous ideas like that the 2nd Amendment only applies to conventional weapons of the 18th Century while exempting the 1st Amendment so that the media can continue to pelt us with filth and lies at 5G speeds. A law isn’t worth a damn if nobody follows it and there’s no punishment for those who transgress.

People will always experience temptation, and there will always be a market for sin. It’s a matter of personal responsibility to resist. Community can help and make participation in sin costly. But you must choose to assent to be part of such a community and to perpetuate this community. We’re back at the problem of human will and the requirements of discipline and discernment.

Winding the clock back to an arbitrary date technologically, will not fix these problems. The Amish, although suffering far less vice than the average American, are still tethered to the fate of America. The military, in Victoria, maintains an exemption to the laws about technology. This is a necessity. You don’t fight your mortal enemy with shield and sword while they call in drone strikes and various other things you call “unsporting.” Yes, we have “Just War” theory, but it’s worth noting that historically this only applied to Christendom. When Europe went to war with Saracens, they showed no quarter, for they were shown none. At any rate, Just War theory went out the window with WWI. You could make an argument that it first began to lapse in the Napoleonic Wars with the act of conscription to go kill other European Christians rather than relying on professional militaries. Perhaps we can return to more chivalric notions of violence between Europeans when there’s a “Europe” to speak of. To do so now would only invite disaster.

One thing remains clear: we can’t simply “go back” and rewind the clock from where we are now. Even if we had the political will and force to return to a different technological era, I feel confident that the temptations would persist, and people would find novel ways to create misery. We would inevitably find ourselves in the chimeric environment in which we live today. Moreover, we would deny ourselves many of the graces God has granted us through intellect. I believe “Science” must become a lower-case “s-word” again and resume its prior status as a study of the natural world as God made it, and that all good things are a gift from God. However, the arbitrary limitation of our technological capacity will not address the fundamental problems of discipline and discernment.

I’ll leave you with the words of Dimitri Karamazov in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. “The awful thing is that beauty is mysterious as well as terrible. God and the devil are fighting there and the battlefield is the heart of man”

The post A Retro-Culture Rewind is Not Enough appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Why are Indians so predominant in leftist movements, particularly heading them? Many older conservatives perpetuate the myth that Indians are conservative, as well. Perhaps, they talked to a handful of the Indian men at work who are socially conservative. That said, with the possible exception of Vivek Ramaswamy, even all of the Indian activists on the “Right” are to the left of their White peers on the Right. Dinesh D’Souza smears conservative activism prior to the 1970s as “actually leftist.” Nikki “Not My Real Name” Haley has the exact same political positions as a 2008 Barack Obama. You’d think you’d be able to find a Steve King, or a Satvik Kandahari, if you please. But, alas, no. If you’re looking for a Pavel Buchanan, you’re in even worse shape.

One must come to terms with the fact that the fundamental allegiance of Indians in the United States (and the West in general) is to the Left. There are a few reasons for this. We’ll address them one by one.

1. They are part of the Coalition of the AscendantIf you listen to any late 20th century propaganda, specifically in elite circles, you’ll hear no shortage of whining about how WASPy something is. That is, full of White Anglo-Saxon Protestants. You know, the kind of people that put their John Hancocks on the Declaration of Independence. Like John Hancock, come to think about it. WASPS maintained a pretty solid hold over the country they established up through the early 20th century.

These days, “White” has replaced WASP as the object of vitriol from the malcontents. More specifically, “White man” has replaced “White” as the cause of all pestilence, famine, war, and the reason your toast always falls buttered-side down. We must remove him from power – yesterday, if at all possible. So, who’s on “team not-White”? Everybody else. The Dissident Right often refers to this unholy alliance as the “Coalition of the Ascendant.” White women and White men can join to if they opt to become feminists, gays, transexuals, or perhaps all of these. Anything to get out of the target zone.

Indians have benefitted from preferential treatment as “Southeast Asians.” They enjoy enhanced visa acceptance, academic scholarships and university placement, hiring preferences, and other sorts of goodies that, when we started giving out, were earmarked only to blacks. We were mean to them, according to our textbooks. We were mean to Indians, too, but we’re talking about a different kind of Indian. And before you whine at me for calling them that, both the disreputable Bureau of Indian Affairs and the more reputable American Indian Movement both refer to themselves as that. The closest the Indians of Asia can get to saying Americans were mean to them is that the British were mean to them, and the British were…you guessed it: WASPS.

Everybody knows a good grift when they see one. The Indians have merely joined in with the blacks, Hispanics, East Asians, and the rest in an attempt to extort tax money from the White middle-class in order to fund their ascendency in the United States. They now typically trade-off with East Asians and Jews for “highest income per household in the U.S.,” per studies and census data. None of these strike me as particularly oppressed groups, but I’m here to take Indians to task for today. East Asians will have to wait. The other group? What other group? I never mentioned another group and neither should you, if you don’t want to end up in Jonathan Greenblatt’s crosshairs.

1. They come from a collectivist culture that operates on shameIn all Eastern cultures, being out-of-line with the group consensus is the easiest way to get yourself exiled, if you’re lucky. This is called shaming. Whatever the powerful think, you should think, too. Easterners are very good at reading a room, seeing who’s in charge, and emphatically agreeing. Indians are, of course, Easterners. Actually, their obsequiousness to power is so total that they will take it a little too far and embarrass themselves with their groveling.

Dinesh D’Souza read the conventional Right’s worship of WW2 America so well that he wrote an entire book about how Nazis, who criminalized public lewdness, sent women back to the kitchen, and regularly burned degenerate literature, were, in fact, “progressives.” He went too far, but he just couldn’t help himself. Fortunately for him, the average American conservative is dumber than he is. Sure, 1933 Germany was National “Socialist,” but I don’t see the average conservative whining about the corporatist nationalization of the American railroad system in the 19th century or the existence of the U.S. postal service.

If you see an Indian bending over backwards (this isn’t a yoga joke) to double down on the leftist perspective to the point of absurdity, realize it’s because she’s read the room and she knows who’s in charge. Regardless of which party controls the three branches of government, an army of bureaucrats, the media, lobbyists, and corporate managerial types enact progressive policy or stymie conservative policy. It doesn’t matter who’s in office, somehow the Left always gets their way with few exceptions.

Under Reagan, our jobs got shipped overseas. With Bush Sr. we got new taxes. Under W. Bush we got “No Child Left Behind.” Under Trump, we got $250 million a year pumped into Historically Black Universities so they could learn to hate White people with slightly better grammar. For brevity’s sake, I’m sticking to one achievement per person. Rest assured, there’s plenty more. And all of their “conservative” achievements were meaningless and ultimately ineffective, which is why I suspect they were permitted to obtain them. Some of these guys had majority-Republican Congresses and Supreme Courts to boot.

Indians have correctly pinpointed that leftists hold virtually all power in the U.S. and have since the 1960s. They don’t see it changing any time soon, and they want to ensure the undisputed king knows they’re loyal, even if the king finds their offers to lick his shoes distasteful and kind of embarrassing.

1. They feel confident they can maintain dominance over the Coalition of the Ascendant once they obtain powerIndians, particularly the ones in the U.S., are no strangers to ruling over less intelligent, more violent classes. They refer to it as the caste system. Most of the ones in the United States were Brahmins (priests, independently wealthy), Kshatriyas (military officers, bureaucrats, politicians), and Vaishyas (merchants), all in the top 1/4 of the population or higher (although the immigration pattern is changing). They have quite a bit of experience controlling their “lessers.”

They feel confident that they can easily govern a United States composed primarily of blacks and Hispanics as well. Eventually, they’ll no-doubt import their “untouchable” Dalit class. I must confess, history’s on their side if we’re talking about governing a nation with limited social strife and hierarchical instability. That said, in terms of the typical yardsticks of society, America would be a much worse place. America would resemble India with a colder climate. Nobody wants to live in India, least of all Indians.

Don’t believe my prognosis? Is it possible to walk down the street anywhere in Mumbai free from rape, robbery, or murder? Is it possible to eat the food without fear of food poisoning? Are the streets pristine and not littered with garbage and human refuse? Well, it depends. If you are walking in Bombay, as Mumbai was called during the British Raj, yes. India used to be a place where one could have reasonable security of his or her person and property. The streets were clean and orderly. The Raj held vendors to standards for cleanliness and health. Did they have the iPhone or the laptop? No, but they couldn’t run phone-scams from them, either. And if they could, it would have been prohibited and the practitioners punished severely.

If you can believe (and you should) that India under Indian rule became unlivable, it shouldn’t be a stretch of your imagination to believe that America under Indian rule will become unlivable. There might be good technology. They might even develop some technology (doubtful). But given that many people surveyed in the United States view previous decades as better, I think a lot of people would forgo the iPhone or even the Nintendo 64 for a safe, stable, and prosperous society. Instead, you’ll find the blacks, Hispanics, and Dalits in their ghettos as the various higher castes go about their business, trying not to think about the decline of the country they conquered and definitely trying not to wonder why they couldn’t maintain it.

The post The Indian Question appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I do not follow the NBA and I care even less about the WNBA. That being said, I do not live under a rock and thus I am aware of Caitlin Clark, the most recent first overall draft pick for the WNBA and who is projected to be a future superstar. She certainly looks to be one of the most marketable players the league has ever had. This is important because another, years-long controversy concerning the WNBA is that their players are not paid enough – especially in relation to the NBA. Now, the reasons for this are obvious enough, the NBA is a multi-billion-dollar industry with global reach, something the WNBA cannot even come close to achieving. Everyone knows this, but people would rather keep their job than make an honest observation.

If that is your goal, a player like Caitlin Clark is a welcomed addition to the league. Not that she will turn the WNBA into an NBA-level juggernaut anytime soon, but having a household name player will bring in more revenue, which will boost player pay. We can see this same phenomenon in the NBA. As hard as it is to believe now, but up until the mid-1980s and especially before the mid-1970s, basketball was nowhere near as popular as the NFL and MLB. Just to give you an idea of how little popularity the NBA once had – on March 2, 1962, Wilt Chamberlain scored 100 points in a single game. It’s a record that has never been broken and will almost certainly never be broken. The game even took place in Madison Square Garden, but no footage of it exists; basketball was not popular enough for anyone to bother filming it. But, a series of highly marketable players, the most significant of which was Michael Jordan, changed all that. One would think Caitlin Clark would be universally welcomed. A high-profile player that can bring new fans to the game and help raise player salaries. And indeed, attendance has gone up significantly in just her short time in the league.

However, one would be wrong about her welcomed status in the WNBA because Caitlin Clark is White.

To be fair, there has been some push back on this, with many defending her, but it is still remarkable just how much hatred she is inspiring for being White. Several pieces, from mainstream outlets, are complaining about a White person being the most popular athlete in a traditionally black sport, and even some of the players have joined in with Clark being frequently fouled. One of the players even received a standing ovation from the fans after fouling Clark.

This should serve as a reminder of just how little Whites can do to appease the Left. Caitlin Clark is Catholic, but as far as I can tell, is far from being Harrison Butker. She offers the WNBA the one thing that a league needs to break through, a bankable star. It really is hard to overstate just how important this is. As I’ve already mentioned, Michael Jordan and others helped turn the NBA into what it is today. I am, believe it or not, a hockey fan, and I very much owe my fandom to Wayne Gretzky’s trade to the Los Angeles Kings. That trade opened up the sport to warm weather climates. Caitlin Clark could do the same for the WNBA. If anyone is serious about increasing player salary, Clark is a godsend. But it was never about the financial fate of WNBA players. It was about hating men, blaming sexism for the salary discrepancy and ignoring all other factors. As it turns out, that was also not enough. It is also about hating Whites, which is why Clark has soon found herself cast as a White devil rather than as an important part of the sisterhood.

We must understand that we are dealing with fundamentally miserable people who like to wallow in their own misery. I am not talking about the average black person on the street, but the activist class that hates life. They will never be happy, and they like it better that way. There is no appeasing them. You can give them a realistic chance of getting something they say they want, and they will still hate you. Caitlin Clark is now learning that the hard way.

The post They’ll Still Hate You appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

When the ruling party starts conducting kangaroo court proceedings versus rival presidential candidates, the temptation is to extrapolate to full Stalinist show trials – the regime culling its enemies as a signifier of victory rather than as a mechanism to achieve it.

This isn’t exactly wrong. But paradoxically, despite losing his show trial, Trump is not headed towards the Lubyanka basement. NPR is gently preparing their audience for a sentencing hearing that results in zero jail time, but instead delivers a cinematic montage of what awaits his supporters if they lose – a mere four days before the Republican National Convention.

How did we get to this point? I have a few hypotheses.

No. 1: Affirmative action DAs botching a kangaroo court was good actually

In this telling, the scholarly honors student Alvin Bragg (Harvard class of ‘95, where he was literally described as “the anointed one” by a publication that still understood how to do a tiny bit of irony) jumped the gun and initiated an incredibly ham-handed railroading of the leading presidential candidate in a way that can only further Trump’s campaign pitches – that he is a threat to the system, that he and his supporters are persecuted by an unjust regime, that DEMOCRATS are rigging the election, again, and so on. Existing institutions are delegitimized, Trump is now forced to WIN or DIE, and upon ascension will begin the process of dismantling them out of sheer self preservation instinct.

Alvin Bragg doesn’t care about any of this, because he wants to be governor or attorney general or etc, and high profile screwjobs are canonically how a prosecutor gets there, regardless of who holds the presidency as a result. Trust the plan – Bragg arrested, Gitmo’d, executed by ‘26.

No. 2: They’re literally just gonna kill him

It is over. The trial was not a delaying or smearing tactic; the Democrat apparatchik put in charge of the railroading will complete the maneuver by imposing a sentence sufficient to preclude campaigning, or a bullshit “parole” or “home confinement” that allows him to summon Trump at will with the same effect. Trump is martyred in prison. Biden resigns for “health reasons”. Kamala Harris cackles into the Oval Office as our first Canadian president, with Gavin to follow, succeeded by an infinite string of party men in various shades of brown and grey.

No. 3: A hamhanded hamstringing a la Trump’s first term

The more “normal” the election is, the likelier a Trump victory. 2020 happened because libs essentially declared a global state of exception, where we couldn’t possibly follow antiquated principles like one man-one vote, or an “election day”, in the context of Basically The Plague plus Literally Hitler trying to win, racistly. Without the ability to pull these maneuvers, or to pretend that Biden is the “return to normalcy” candidate, Trump has an excellent shot.

So the goal is to cripple his administration, exactly as they did the first time, with various ongoing civil and criminal legal entanglements that everyone pretends to take super seriously. “Mr. President, did you check in with your parole officer before you flew to Geneva to mediate the Ukraine war?”

No. 4: The fix was in, and Trump is the fall guy

The inverse 5D Warhammer hypothesis. The objective material situation, globally, is not great. The supranational NATO “security” clique seems like they are trying to tiptoe into a hot war with Russia. The US economy has been in a state of dislocation since 2020 that is becoming increasingly unignorable – stagflation combined with a federal debt burden that cannot plausibly be increased at its current rate means that the dice are loaded for a classic debt crisis sometime in the next four years.

In this view, Trump will be the opportunity to lance the boil on all these problems at once, and lay the fallout at his feet. Regime change in Russia and the completion of the 90s looting project that was aborted when Putin came to power, a domestic cramdown of disastrous economic policies on an uppity middle class, and provocation of China into a hot war while it is still theoretically winnable.

This is compatible with No. 3, but with the variation that the prosecutions are designed to fail, by picking novel legal theories with the worst possible fact patterns, rather than whatever legitimate white collar crime could be dug up from a 40 year career in property development. I love property developers, some of my best friends etc, but I cannot think of a single one that doesn’t have colorable felonies under their belt given that the essence of the job is telling mutually supporting lies to counterparties to resolve coordination issues around funding vs opportunities vs permitting vs buyers and so on, butressed by an exoskeleton of bribes.

Doing this under Biden, or forcing Kamala to cackle through it, risks laying it at the feet of the Party, when the goal would ideally be to blame it on Full Socialism never having been tried.

But what is actually going on?

The left relies heavily on memes for distributed coordination. You don’t need to hand out marching orders when you have a ruling class that thinks more or less identically, modulo some minor tactical disagreements. The implication is that all of these can be true, for various distinct actors, and the Trump prosecution was a Murder on the Libtard Express. But what it really signifies is the completion of the liberal project – everything that can be “liberated” has been, and now we are observing the fallout start to accrue. It is an empirical question how this shakes out over the next couple years (this being the funniest timeline, my money is on Trump somehow riding the situation into ruling as dictator-for-life for another twenty), but we will not get, for instance, reciprocal prosecutions of libs by red state attorneys general – there is no metastable back-and-forth equilibrium to be had, it will collapse to one thing or another.

The only worthwhile political project right now is making sure that Trump in fact comes through this as the win-or-die candidate and subsequently pulls it off.

-By Hank Oslo

The post Libtard Gotterdammerung appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Art critics view film as the pinnacle of art as it combines acting, choreography and dance, visual art via cinematography, music, and writing. One would think these art critics have a black-and-white French auteur film in mind when they say this, but these movies hardly move anybody who isn’t dripping with pretension and desire for praise of their taste. Where are the pyrotechnics, rock riffs, and bulging biceps?

America perfected this synthesis of art, and it’s called professional wrestling. It’s got nothing in common with Greco-Roman wrestling as practiced in middle schools, high schools, colleges, or the Olympics. If anybody’s practicing pro wrestling on amateur levels, it’s kids and inebriated adults in their backyards with the predictable trips to the ER following shortly thereafter.

What makes professional wrestling superior to film? It does everything that film does while incorporating gymnastics and also exploring concepts such as performance art and audience participation in the creation of the art. It simultaneously captures irony and genuineness in its performative nature and the loyalty of its fans, many of whom swear it’s not staged. And it started a solid three decades ahead of Burning Man.

One should think of pro wrestling, especially through the WWE or AEW (or even older and more Southern, such the NWA territories) as an American Kabuki theater — with flamethrowers, cages, and folding chairs. There’s not just choreography. There’s choreographed backflip body-slams. There’s not just a grim narrator describing the story. There’s Jim Ross. There’s not just dramatic drums and flutes. There’s Limp Bizkit and motorcycles.

It’s over-the-top. It’s got everything you could want. Although the art class views it as low-brow, it transcends all of their standards and creates a uniquely American form of art. So far, nowhere else on Earth has come close to capturing it. The French have their Impressionist painters. The Netherlands has the Dutch Masters. The Russians have their grim novelists. The English and Irish have their melancholy poets. The Italians have their operas. The Germans have their symphonies. The Spaniards and Portuguese have their architecture.

As for we Americans, we’ve got the folding chair, the scream of an electric guitar, and a perfectly executed double-suplex.

The post A Double Axe Handle Smash of Culture appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

“Lord, how are they increased that trouble me! Many are they that rise up against me.”

Psalm 3:1

As the American clown car careens around what may be one of the final curves, it would be good to come to terms with what you and I are capable of doing about it.

The correct answer is, nothing.

But there’s a prudential powerless nothing, like understanding you can’t change the weather and that shaking your fist at clouds is silly. Then there’s a slothful and stupid nothing, like choosing to not get out of the rain and lightning.

As fun as it might be, daring to predict the future is more than a little played out. Too many have been predicting an inevitable life in the Thunderdome since the 2007-2008 financial crisis. (I literally don’t know anyone who wouldn’t have preferred that over the reality of the last 15 years.) Nevertheless, let’s examine five looming issues in context of the two ways in which you can Do Nothing.

TrumpThe injustice is extreme and the final act in the psycho fantasy of the Regime is only just beginning to play out.

The prudential Do Nothing response is do not Fedpost, do not attend a rally, do not donate, do not argue with the impenetrably stupid, do not contact your congressman, and do not worry because you are completely and utterly powerless to save The Donald or fix the system.

If Trump is alive and actually on the ballot, the stupid Do Nothing is to not vote for him. In spite of him embodying the Yankee Boomer, and for all his faults, all the missteps, all the kowtowing to POCs, Israel, and celebration of MAGA trannies, if there’s even a 1% chance he will actually begin deportations (or at least get the conversation into the mainstream), you have to support him. If your position is that “my vote is meaningless because the system is rigged,” you’ve brought a smile to the faces of Hector and Camacho. The South will not survive four more years of MesoAmerican enrichment.

The EconomyInflation, the deliberate killing of the dollar, the impending release of a BRICS currency, the fact that a double wide can now cost as much as a stick frame home did just five years ago… these are just a few of the very real things that may quickly go from bad macro problems to micro crisis, as in your wallet is noticeably thinner.

The wise Do Nothing is to not spend a penny more than you need on non-essentials until you see how 2024 plays out. It is remarkable the collapse hasn’t happened, and it may just limp along for years and years. Or not. I clearly remember 2007 and the hot moments since then and things do feel significantly more urgent.

The stupid Do Nothing is not to spend every penny you can spare on things that you will continue to need, use and that you may depend on to live and trade with, like extra chain saws, food, and laying hens. Crypto, gold coins and a second Trijicon ACOG should not be on that list.

WarPick the continent, spin the wheel, win a conflict. The rumors say nuclear is incoming imminent, wonks say mostly regional fighting is still decades away. With collapsing birth rates across the First World and the rise of non-Western powers, wars will certainly come.

The prudential Do Nothing means don’t have any anxiety over this. We are very small fish in a pond with whales. Like trying to reform a three letter agency or saving Trump from having a fatal slip and fall accident in his cell, realize you’re powerless.

The slothful and stupid Do Nothing would be to not discourage someone who’s ready to enlist right now. Shoot them in the foot if you need to. Think about how to keep as much normalcy in your family’s lives if supply chains grind to a halt, and start closing gaps.

As much as our darker side might be happy to see urban blue centers under mushroom clouds, it means you’re probably going to die, too. Doing nothing to get right with God and striving to remain in a state of Grace would be a mistake.

Civil UnrestThe malnourished underclasses are sent from Rent-a-Mob.com for reasons of justice and rage, people behaving badly when the WIC debit card shows a zero balance, the weekend release of a new Nike… the tempo of street violence and in particular POC v. Whitey is increasing.

The smart Do Nothing is to not protect feelings but have the courage to calmly tell normie friends and family that this is a racial problem first. Even if blame could be assigned to ideological brainwashing by the Left, unfair economics, past grievances, or a bad batch of Covid bath salts on the streets, it does nothing to change the reality that the zombies want to eat your brain. The prudential Do Nothing also means having no guilt for accepting that this reality can’t be changed and you’re not a bad person filled with hate for understanding this.

The stupid Do Nothing is to not move away from zip codes with zombies. If you’re not also actively building friendships with likeminded people within a ten-mile radius that you can count on to watch your family, put out a fire, or have a meal with, realize zombies have cars and they will figure out where you live sooner or later. You’ll need people you can count on to help keep them away.

DixieReconstructed, reimagined, regurgitated. For every bright spot in the South, there are two with mold that need bleaching.

Do Nothing to actively support local politics courting corporations to relocate to the South because it’s good for the economy and will create jobs. These companies are cancer. They forever change rural and urban areas as they import workers and their out of state cultures (often from out of country), and with disproportionate influence, they are making communities, the schools, and coffee shops gay.

You should Do Nothing to support or emulate a culture that wants to kill you. Do Nothing to make peace with the Yankee zeitgeist and style, no matter how alluring or cool as it may seem. It is all deception.

Do Nothing selfish or stupid to hurt the cause of a Free Dixie. This begins with understanding we’re each an ambassador and Doing Nothing that shows you take this role seriously in our public and private conduct, including how we look physically, is a big miss.

We have a movement of spirit more than an organized body. A broad and unified coalition acting in a coordinated effort (even if operating under the radar) doesn’t exist at a scale large enough to make a difference yet given the pressing rate of change and possible chaos. Get connected with people locally (they are there) and use the resources available to smartly evangelize for Dixie. Legacy Southern Heritage organizations are not perfect, but they are forward facing and could probably use our support and charitable input. Infighting and publicly attacking them and each other is harmful. The manly and right thing to do is privately communicate and discuss problems. For those not yet onboard, from the outside, we look fractured, sometimes crazy, definitely unappealing.

Do SomethingThe bad news is that life is not going to get easier and these big problems, regardless of their timelines, will not peacefully resolve themselves. The good news is individually and collectively we can do something right now.

Some of the most complex trench systems during the Civil War were dug by hand and in just a few weeks. We likely have months to years to dig in. There will be no excuse for being caught in the open.

The post Or, You Could Just Do Nothing appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In terms of salable rationales for bombing non-compliant nations across the planet into submission, sodomy would have to be our very best. That’s because it’s a value which all human beings hold dear. Lots of things can be shared through sodomy, much the same as how lots of things can be shared via airplanes. For example: firebombs, nuclear weapons, or Agent Orange.

Nothing brings a sleepy village on the edge of the jungle into the 21st century quite like a few canisters of napalm. Plenty of little kids from Vietnam graced with this experience probably went on to become real Americans just like us. As they bled out on the floor of a nail salon from an armed robbery, I bet they thanked their lucky stars for the day that napalm modernized their extended families. Depending on the estimates, there’s at least a million such cases.

If anyone forgets to value sodomy, America, the world’s indispensable nation, can gently remind them with a color revolution or various other domestic catastrophes engineered in Washington, DC. This will be worth it for the citizens of these nations. Kids are quite expensive to raise, so once they have more spending money in their pockets and their attitudes adjusted, the adults who were burdened with these kids develop a grateful disposition towards Americans.

If they refuse sodomy, well that’s when the gloves must come off. It’s what these poor bastards deserve, and more importantly, what they need. Case in point, there’s a troublesome patch of ground in the Middle East known as the Gaza Strip. It’s supposed to be for trendy Jewish beach condos with a wide main street running down the entire length for pride parades.

Instead, Gaza is inhabited by a retrograde blend of Arab known as Palestinians. They’re determined to linger where they don’t belong rather than moving on to the gay discos being prepared for them in the Egyptian desert.

Everything the Jews have done to them is in the name of love, and yet the Palestinians can’t summon the gratitude to move through the Rafah border crossing. Each day, people around the globe become more exasperated with these Palestinians.

Gay Israeli solder proudly displays LGBTQ flag on Gaza soil in war against Hamas https://t.co/CXaoT5cEVt pic.twitter.com/6Y0oBtL509

— New York Post (@nypost) November 13, 2023

It’s not as if we don’t have our own shortcomings. There’s plenty of progress to be made in our political system, for example. That’s why brilliant female leaders like Nikki Haley are blazing the way towards a more dynamic democracy. She’s proclaimed, and quite lividly so, that Israel doesn’t need America, America needs Israel.

I guess my background was a bit too stale, pale, and male to understand this geopolitical masterstroke. I’d always considered the relationship in more conventional terms. We’re the massive entity cutting the checks, Israel is the tiny entity collecting the money. Israel has the regional problems, we deploy the carrier battle groups. Seemed like quite a simple flow chart to understand any situation which might arise.

While Americans watch Israel burn Gaza alive, and Palestinian children are beheaded, Nikki Haley writes love notes on bombs that drop on civilians.

Let the world bear witness to your moral depravity… pic.twitter.com/GNTGxtUfin

— Dr. Omar Suleiman (@omarsuleiman504) May 28, 2024

Herpes will be the least of their problems. What about white phosphorous? I was also vexed by the issue of delivering explosives to targets. For one thing, America produces these munitions. Another would be the method of delivery. America is the only nation defending sodomy with a fleet of heavy strategic bombers. We have a long tradition of using our industrial might to lift bombs high into the air with four engines and transport them vast distances in order to obliterate the populations of entire cities.

During the dark days of the Third Reich, the residents of Dresden and Cologne found themselves caught up in the madness of opposing the proliferation of sodomy introduced during the Weimar Republic, going so far as to burn books about how to turn Germans into transgenders through surgery. We corrected their intransigence with incendiary bombs, reducing these bigots to ashes. The flames were so intense that bombers were blown off course by the rising hot air from the hell they unleashed on the women and children below.

If I recall correctly, these missions of mercy were carried out by B-17 Flying Fortresses. Their direct successor would be the B-52 Stratofortress. We also have the B-1 Lancer and an iconic stealth bomber, the B-2 Spirit. Israel has been doing its best to enlighten Gaza with F-35s and F-16s, which can only carry a fraction of their payloads. So, what do we need Israel for? We could reenact the glory of World War 2 by leveling the entire strip in a single night if we choose to do so, but Nikki Haley offers zero elaboration on this topic.

Doing a Dresden on Gaza and killing '600,000 civilians' is 'worth it' says Israel's Ambassador to the United Kingdom Tzipi Hotovely.pic.twitter.com/T2cWEZGuRa

— Ragged Trousered Philanderer (@RaggedTP) October 24, 2023

I eventually realized Nikki’s point is that Israel has a stronger faith in sodomy than America. For all of our industrial might, our enthusiasm for anal endeavors is still rather tepid by comparison. We therefore lack the courage of conscience to drop what must be dropped on the Palestinians. This is why we need Israel, or else the light of sodomy will never shine upon the Gaza Strip. Only Jews have the moral clarity to drop eight precision bombs that weigh one ton apiece on a refugee camp.

America’s hands are already full, anyways. We’ve been assembling a coalition around the globe to take on the biggest opponents of sodomy, China and Russia. China labels it a mental illness and bans the dissemination of content to curious citizens yearning to take their children to parades where men prance around in leather costumes and twerk naked to shake the AIDS virus off on adolescent spectators.

Worse yet, Vladimir Putin, the sonofabitch who stole our 2016 election, labels it all “satanic” and has his thugs at the FSB raiding LGBTQ+ activists. His air force also has an array of heavy bombers, and now drops over 3,000 glide bombs on the Ukrainians per month for holding pride parades in Kiev.

Pride Month is a time to come together to honor the contributions of LGBTQ+ service members. We are committed to ensuring and promoting an atmosphere of dignity and respect for all civilian and military personnel. pic.twitter.com/RyGTDBjUcN

— Department of Defense (@DeptofDefense) June 1, 2024

Wait for the very next tweet…..Fortunately, elder statesman Lloyd Austin has been uniting nations that comprise a whopping 18% of the world’s population into a global arsenal of sodomy. Nobody can get themselves enough rectal rectitude. It’s as wholesome as young children giggling with puppies and kittens on a bright sunny day.

This is a pretty astute approach with the Asians in particular, since they’d check to make sure the doors were locked if they spotted Austin walking down the sidewalk next to their car. We need to share the right values to unite our allies in this darkest of hours. What’s better than a dick right up the ass?

NEWS: @SecDef Austin: Nations Around Indo-Pacific Uniting Around Shared Values
https://t.co/MtbvLLJILW

— Department of Defense (@DeptofDefense) June 1, 2024

While citizens of the world eagerly await the day that foreign semi-slave laborers can begin clearing the rubble of Gaza for redevelopment, I must confirm to our readers that the next front will open against Russia and China. Putin will never stop peddling conspiracy theories about “satanism” and an attack on the family structure, while the Chinese Ant Farm is too collective and autistic to appreciate the value of a dick up the ass.

Something must be done of course, or else America would be abdicating its leading role in the world. Through cross-referencing our history with our values, we can infer that this spells a mandate for the delivery of big-time firepower. As Donald Trump would phrase it: fabulous firepower, the biggest firepower anyone has ever seen. It’s gonna be some really great firepower.

JUST IN – Russia moves to ban LGBTQ ‘movement’ for ‘extremism’ https://t.co/Pmb8O62FtY

— Insider Paper (@TheInsiderPaper) November 17, 2023

With American support, the Ukrainians recently attacked one of Russia’s early warning radars with drones. These facilities alert their leadership to incoming ICBMs, providing precious minutes for making decisions about launching a counter strike. I think we can all do the math on this one.

Apparently, so can Putin. Tactical nuclear warheads mounted on Iskander mobile systems have been deployed to Belarus, and nuclear readiness drills have recently been conducted. We can’t allow the blustering of a Soviet thug deter our imposition of the Rules-Based International Order. It would appear we’re heading for a showdown hotter than a super strain of gonorrhea bred inside of a gay man’s anus.

Dick, up the ass. That’s the rule. Without rules, there can be no freedom or human rights. These rules are the responsibility of all patriotic Americans. The rest of the world yearns for freedom while looking to this great nation for leadership. The courage of America is our character.

The character of America is a man crawling across the asphalt on all fours with a ball gag in his mouth. As small children cheer from the sidewalk, another man dressed as a festive female demon flogs him with a riding crop. Through freedom, our dignity shines like a beacon to the oppressed.

China crackdown pushes LGBT groups into the shadows https://t.co/epgyTpozXu

— BBC News (World) (@BBCWorld) June 28, 2023

The post Sharing These Values appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In a previous work,[1] I spent about 90 pages on what caused the Southern states to leave the Union. I argue the central theme, the underlying issue to all the other disagreements, was the Southern commitment to “states’ rights.” But what are states’ rights, and how does it contrast with the opposite, what Lincoln wanted, centralization?

States’ rights are our American version of decentralization or self-government. Decentralization, or localism, is based first on the extended family or household; when grouped with other clans, this became a locality, creating laws organically for the benefit of all. On the other hand, centralization occurs when forces far from these self-governing localities use their power and influence to impose their ways on smaller localities. In such a situation, the former free individuals lose their self-governance and the option to choose from diverse ways of life, becoming tools used to benefit those in power in distant lands under an increasingly conformist policy.

People conceived of governments to benefit them and reflect eternal law, but eventually, they become so powerful and efficient they begin to manipulate the people for their own benefit. Democratic states tend to end up centralizing political power in a few oligarchs. The central authority begins to creep in and take over every opposing competing institution able to impede its progress. They subject local governance, churches, family or tribal ties, local laws, and customs to the majority’s will, imposed by a small minority of powerful government officials. Further, only the largest majority is sovereign. The largest majority at the federal level overrules numerous smaller and more diverse majorities in smaller localities. Centralization inevitably leads to One Majority to Rule Them All.

Once power becomes centralized in the majority at the federal level they make super PACs with powerful interest groups. Money and power are transferred between these groups as they increasingly stack the deck in their favor and advertise to the voters they are vital to maintain. Through regulations, the oligarchs impede competition from the individual, local authorities, the local shop owner, the farmer, and on down the line. At the same time, they subsidize the more prominent corporations, bankers, politicians, and their allies. Eventually, they manipulate society to fit them to how they can serve the central authority best. Human nature, the mind, and even the soul are all adapted as needed.

If I brought my car to be repaired by the Amish, and they decided to swap out my car for a buggy, it is improbable I would ever return to them for repairs. Yet, no matter how poorly the government’s services perform, we are forced to keep returning to the same system; the modern state is the destroyer of diversity.

Decentralization allows for diversity in politics. It allows each area to maintain its laws unhindered by distant majorities. During the Middle Ages, towns and small villages were often wholly autonomous. Peasants could travel to like-minded groups and live peacefully without politics, elections, fighting, etc. People willingly separated based on ethnicity, religion, politics, economics, and much else. It was the opposite of modern coercion and government force. It allowed people to live as they wished because that was the priority, not those in power.

Medieval DecentralizationReaders of Defending Dixie’s Land will notice chapter 11 is entirely of similarities between Old Dixie and Medieval Europe. The Old South was a Protestant version of Christendom that existed between 700-1300 A.D. Culture, politics, religion, etc., were extremely uniform with the Middle Ages. As I show in my recently released book, Missing Monarchy: What Americans Get Wrong About Monarchy, Democracy, Feudalism, And Liberty, the South did not invent the idea of self-governance or decentralization; they were carrying on a political system that predated the Declaration of Independence.

When obedience is required, such as under the modern state or ancient Rome, the people suffer. The opposite occurs in a free society. Historically the more tribal, the more close-knit the families, the more self-governing and resistant to outside governmental authority. Centralized governments pull these bonds apart, preferring obedience to the state.

Even though someone might be a king of a vast realm during the Middle Ages, he may not have influenced the entire area he was “king” of. For example, Northern Italy consisted of several autonomous cities and duchies; their “king” ruled a minimal area around the Po valley. Likewise, the well-known and mighty Holy Roman Emperor Frederick Barbarossa controlled only within his family lands in Swabia. The rest of the empire was governed as autonomous realms. Professor Philip Daileader described the Holy Roman Empire in 1273 as a “loose confederation of hundreds of very tiny units, principalities, city-states, and bishoprics.” Historian Will Durant described the same when he wrote, “No German nation existed yet; there were only Saxons, Swabians, Bavarians, Franks… no one system of laws governed the realm… each region kept its own customs and Code.”

Even under Charlemagne, the most prominent early medieval example of a pre-Renaissance monarch, power was limited, and historians Tierney and Painter wrote, “all the different people of the empire continued to live according to their own native laws. Charlemagne had no intention of abolishing this diversity,” and there was “virtually no public taxation, and Charlemagne depended for revenue on the proceeds of his own land.”[2] A contemporary of Charlemagne was Einhard, who wrote a biography of the emperor. In it, he describes the power of the later Merovingian kings of the Franks:

“The Merovingian family…had long since been devoid of vital strength, and conspicuous only from bearing the empty epithet Royal…There was nothing left the King to do but to be content with his name of King…He had nothing that he could call his own beyond this vain title of King…except a single country seat, that brought him but a very small income. There was a dwelling house upon this, and a small number of servants attached to it, sufficient to perform the necessary offices. When he had to go abroad, he used to ride in a cart, drawn by a yoke of oxen driven, peasant-fashion, by a Ploughman.”

Towns, manors, monasteries, isolated villages, and great dukedoms across feudal Europe were typically autonomous. In 800 A.D., Ireland was made up of perhaps 150 separate kingdoms. At the same date, sparsely populated Norway was divided into 31 principalities. By 1200 A.D., there were 200 autonomous city-states in Northern Italy. In the 14th century, Germany was made up of 600 autonomous realms. According to Will Durant, Spain was broken down into tiny realms of petty kings, but “even within each little kingdom unity was an interlude; the nobles almost ignored the kings except in war.” Monasteries were close-knit autonomous communities lovingly dedicated to man and God. Many areas became autonomous or nearly autonomous by gift giving. Nobles would give large sections of land free or nearly free of obligations to family and friends.

Lords controlled within their own spheres, as did dukes, princes, barons etc., and held autonomy. Each realm had its own laws and courts, and the local village conducted affairs with no control from the King’s capital or a higher lord’s influence. Historian Régine Pernoud wrote decentralization provided “variety between one town and another and gave a charming and attractive aspect to the country…each town possessed to a degree which is to-day almost unimaginable, its own personality.” Historian Chris Wickham described the medieval situation as the “radical decentralization of political power in the west.” With decentralized lordship, each local residency maintained its customs and law with no outside force imposing its will. In the thirteenth century, Beaumanoir remarked “each Baron is sovereign in his own Barony.” The people might recognize the king and even honor him, but outside of his family’s inheritance, he could not control anything in those areas. A decentralized kingship should be understood as an aristocracy of sovereign lords rather than a monarchy. Both ancient Roman and modern governmental systems have destroyed such political diversity.

There was incredible diversity in this age. Even in this anarcho-monarchist world, communists might find the monasteries to their liking. The monks elected the abbots, and everyone, whether noble or serf, was treated with perfect equality because “we are all one in Christ…God is no respecter of persons.” They held no possessions but shared everything as a community.

Diversity of laws existed within a single realm, dukedom, or town. The 9th-century bishop Agobard of Lyons said, “It often happened that five men were presented sitting together, and not one of them had the same law as another.” Unless, of course, they desired to change the law they were under, which at times made things complicated for judges. As Professor Thomas Madden said, “As people came before courts or before judges they would have to declare which they were and what law they lived under.” Powerful guilds were often self-governing societies within these towns as well.

At various times and places in England, both the Vikings and the Anglo-Saxons lived together in peace. They co-existed, but they never considered forcing their customs on the other. Frederic Seebohm writes, “The amalgamation of the two people into one did not occur. Danes continued to live under their laws and the English under theirs.” At various times, and out of their own free will, even Danes accepted English lords. Law was personal and based on choice. It was individualistic, not nationalistic—not our modern sense of top-down subjugation where “citizens” of a geographical area are forced to accept a ruler’s arbitrary authority; they brought their law with them.[3]

Contrary to popular opinion, the Jewish quarters of medieval towns were not an early form of segregation. Rather it derived from various kings and lords advertising to Jews they allotted them an area where they could enjoy self-government under their own religion and customs. Jews migrated to those areas to achieve it. What was an example of tolerance and friendship—the allowing of a minority group to live as they would like to—has somehow turned into a discriminatory, racist activity. (I would love to see Democrats and Republicans show this sort of tolerance to minorities like libertarians- monarchists- or even each other).

Likewise, in the Crusader states, Italian merchants were given a section of the city to live by their own customs. The Anglo-Saxons had their own section in Rome for the many visitors from England. Even in the crusader states, Muslims swore oaths on the Koran, Jews on the Torah, and Christians on the Bible. After capturing Antioch, Crusader lord Bohemund allowed local Muslims who wished to convert to follow a newly baptized Emir, while the others stayed under the laws of the “Saracens.” Scholar Jonathan Riley-Smith wrote, “Far from being forced to convert, the Muslim villagers were run by a council of elders who in turn appointed a “rayse” to represent the community to the Christian lord, while all spiritual and social matters were regulated by the imams in the community in accordance with Sharia law! The Christian rulers might believe Islam is wrong, endangering their eternal salvation, yet still believed Muslims had the right to be judged by their own customs.

These principles generally did not change during wartime, as even the cost of losing a war was very mild politically. It could be the extraction of an oath or a single payment, the loss of a town, or the ability to collect a toll from the lord who lost. But the population generally carried on life and obligations as they did before the conflict. Even when a lord conquered a new territory and its defeated people, Morrall writes they “generally made no attempt to impose a uniform legal code on their new territories. The maxim that every man must be judged by the law of his own people was strictly observed; what was more, he carried with him, wherever he went, the right to live under his own law.”

In my town (population around 500), there was a debate over whether to build a shed to store salt for the truck crews. This issue stirred up strong emotions and opinions on both sides. One side argued, multiple times, if the town did not build a new shed, it might be punished by the state for violating regulations. While the residents debated what they viewed as the vital issue—whether to build the shed—I could not help but see a far more critical matter. Can the town not build a shed paid for by their own taxpayers without being intimidated by politicians not close to the decision? We have lost our self-governance to more powerful distant individuals who never step foot in our town. If we were to abolish the political oppression of centralization; if we were to emancipate ourselves from tyranny; we could have thousands of tiny self-governing communities as our forebears enjoyed. If we abolished centralized governance, so much anger and hatred towards each other would disappear. People could live with like-minded people governed as they desire. All of “we the people” would benefit. The ones who would suffer would be bureaucrats and our overlords in D.C. If we were a Christian society loving others as we love ourselves, we would not make them suffer under a political system they did not ask for and do not desire.

-By Jeb Smith

Jeb Smith is the author of Defending Dixie’s Land: What Every American Should Know About The South And The Civil War (written under the name Isaac. C. Bishop)and Missing Monarchy: What Americans Get Wrong About Monarchy, Democracy, Feudalism, And Liberty. You can contact him at jackson18611096@gmail.com.

[1] Defending Dixie’s Land: What Every American Should Know About The South And The Civil War

[2] (Tierney and Painter 1983, 139)(Peters 1989, 34)

[3] (Wolfe 2022, 146-147)(Monte 2014, 81)(Holmes 1988, 213)

The post States’ Rights and Self Governance appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

It was an event decades in the making, but it finally happened. The African National Congress (ANC), the ruling party in South Africa since the fall of apartheid, finally lost their majority. Votes are still being counted, so it is unclear just how many seats the ANC will have, but it is clear that they will be forced into a coalition government with one of the three major opposition parties. Depending on which party the ANC forms a coalition with will determine the path of the country for at least the next five years, but I fear all this will do is, at best, hold off an all-out slaughter of the remaining Whites. At worst, we could be looking at a genocide in the coming months. All this in a country that, a century ago, looked poised to become a White-majority nation.

First, I believe it is necessary to understand why the ANC can no longer maintain a majority. South Africa has a major problem with corruption and mismanagement – these are long-term trends that have only gotten worse since 2009. Unemployment, especially youth unemployment, is very severe and the country can no longer maintain its power system, resulting in rolling blackouts. All this is leading to the breakup of the compromise that was put in place after the fall of apartheid. By the time apartheid ended, the Soviet Union had collapsed, meaning Nelson Mandela could no longer depend on Soviet aid like he could a decade earlier. Now, the “global community” never cared about the fate of South African Whites, but they did care about their own investments. What this meant is that South Africa, unlike Zimbabwe, could not opt for simply confiscating White owned property. Again, it was not that the global community would have been intrinsically opposed to this, but if the South African government did it this time, there could be no guarantee that they would not do it to properties owned by foreign corporations. Understanding this, wealthy South African Whites offered Mandela a deal – we will consent to the end of apartheid as long as you agree to, more or less, leave our wealth in place. It was a move that threw poor and middle-class South African Whites under the bus, but it did allow the wealthy to maintain their status. There has been violence aimed at Whites, especially rural Whites, but it has not been as large scale as it could have been.

This is all important because South Africa is, demographically speaking, a very young country. A very sizable portion of its voters are too young to remember apartheid and, as such, do not feel the gratitude towards the ANC that the older voters did. They are unwilling to adhere to the compromise struck at the end of apartheid and wish to take open revenge on Whites. Thus, the ANC is stuck – it can no longer ignore the massive problems the country is facing, and a growing portion of its voters see them as an enemy that made a deal with the “White devils.” Sooner or later, these voters will have to be appeased – either the ANC will do it, or they will be taken over by a new, more radical and openly pro-White genocide party and they will do it. And when that day comes, it will become even worse for the remaining Whites.

Currently, there are three major opposition parties in South Africa: Democratic Alliance (DA), uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK), and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). The ANC will only need one of these parties to form a government. The implications of each alliance will be discussed.

Democratic AllianceThe Democratic Alliance (DA) is part of the more moderate elements of the White minority. The old National Party they are not and they, more or less, favor the 1994 compromise, although with less corruption. Forming an alliance with the DA would spook foreign investment far less than the other two options, but it is also risky. The ANC has been losing its support to even more overtly anti-White parties, so an alliance with the DA, as moderate as they are, will likely cost them even more support from their black core. It may form a stable enough government to keep South Africa functioning for a few more years, but in the long-term it would mean an even greater growing animosity towards Whites and the blacks willing to compromise with them. Eventually, the ANC would be forced to throw their allies under the bus to keep power, which they are fully willing to do.

uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK)What must be first understood about the MK is this – they are the party of former South African president Jacob Zuma, a former member of the ANC who was expelled from the party in 2024. As such, MK primarily exists as a vehicle for his supporters to get revenge on the ANC. Primarily, Zuma is seeking a presidential pardon (he’s under investigation for rampant corruption) along with some home rule concessions to the Zulu-majority areas. And while that may look like an easy fix on the surface, in reality, if he is granted his pardon and home rule there is no way to tell what he might demand next. At the very least, it would end MK’s reason for existing, and those voters are not going to the ANC and they certainly are not going to DA. That only leaves the more radical anti-White parties to benefit in the long run.

Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF)Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) represents the most radical anti-White elements of South African politics. Made up almost exclusively of angry, young black men with limited economic prospects, the EFF proposes a simple solution to their woes – take White owned land. Such a proposal would lead to almost immediate disaster, as it did in Rhodesia. Farming is a skill, and it is something that EFF’s base of unskilled workers do not possess. A major famine is in the cards, too. It would also be viewed as a clear example from the business community that the South African government is no longer a trustworthy investment.

Whatever the ANC might do is unimportant. The long-term trends all favor EFF. South Africa is not getting any new voters that can remember apartheid, and the horrible economy means the number of angry voters of limited economic prospects will only grow more. The EFF will eventually take power, or the ANC will be forced to take on EFF’s platform to stay in power. Either way, it spells disaster for White South Africans.

The best-case scenario is that the ANC will make a coalition with one of the two major opposition parties, hopefully DA (buying some time). After that, the Dissident Right must work overtime to bring what is coming into the mainstream. Meme it until the likes of Matt Walsh notices. Meme it until your aunt brings it up during Thanksgiving supper. Force the issue of taking in White South African refugees into the mainstream. Make normies wonder why the “refugees welcome” crowd doesn’t want these refugees. Make our enemies say: “Yes, we do think Whites deserve to be murdered for something that happened decades ago.” Even better, make the idea of an independent White homeland in South Africa a mainstream issue and get the secession ball rolling.

An event decades in the making is here now, roll up your sleeves and turn it into our advantage.

The post A Coming End appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Andersonville was created in February 1864 and was used until April 1865 as a prison camp for Union prisoners of war. It covered an area of about 26.5 acres. During the course of the war, about 45,000 prisoners were received at Andersonville. Of this number, about 13,000 died. Poor diets, dysentery, and typhoid fever were the major causes of death.

The anti-Confederates love to blather about how bad it was at Andersonville, the infamous prisoner of war camp in Georgia, but they are deathly quiet about Camp Douglas, a Yankee prisoner of war camp in Chicago. Confederate Captain Henry Wirz was tried, convicted, and executed for war crimes after the war due to the uncontrollable conditions at Andersonville. Was Wirz to blame for the lack of food and medicine available to the prisoners? The facts are much different than what many so-called “historians” have told us.

Edward Wellington Boate was a soldier in the 42nd New York Infantry and a prisoner at Andersonville in 1864. He wrote of his experiences in the New York Times shortly after the war and commented on whom he held responsible for Andersonville’s legacy.

“You rulers who make the charge that the rebels intentionally killed off our men, when I can honestly swear they were doing everything in their power to sustain us, do not lay this flattering unction to your souls. You abandoned your brave men in the hour of their cruelest need. They fought for the Union and you reached no hand out to save the old faithful, loyal and devoted servants of the country. You may try to shift the blame from your own shoulders, but posterity will saddle the responsibility where it justly belongs.”

Gen. Grant’s Refusal for Prisoner ExchangeLincoln’s blockade of Southern ports kept much needed medicines, known as contraband, from not only reaching the Confederate sick, but the Union prisoners of war as well. Confederate guards died at the same rate as the prisoners. In fact, Confederate guards were often given worse rations than the prisoners. Union General Ulysses S. Grant refused prisoner exchanges with the Confederacy. In an act of desperation, the Confederacy offered up prisoners with no exchange requested, but Grant refused, and therefore, sacrificed his own men. He had rather the prisoners be a burden to the South than have Confederate prisoners returned and once again take up arms against the North.

General Grant said, “If we hold these men caught they are no more than dead men. If we liberate them we will have to fight on until the whole South is exterminated.” General Grant wrote to General Butler on August 18, 1864, “It is hard on our men in Southern prisons not to exchange them, but it is humanity to those left in the ranks to fight our battles.“

The Yankee invaders ravaged the countryside, burning homes, crops, and farm implements, thereby depleting the food supply. While food was in short supply in the South, giving good reason for the malnourishment of the Union prisoners, what was the excuse for starving Confederate prisoners in Yankee prison camps, where food was plentiful? Let’s look at Camp Douglas, known as “Eighty Acres of Hell.”

Camp Douglas was located on the South Side of Chicago. We are told by Union Army records that 4,454 Confederate prisoners died there. The actual number is estimated at more than 5,600. According to the Sons of Confederate Veterans, 6,000 graves are in the cemetery there. In this Northern prison camp, prisoners were intentionally starved, and denied adequate clothing and heating as acts of punishment. The capacity of the prison was 6,000, but 12,000 were crammed into it. By early 1863, the rate of death was over 10 percent per month. Torture, including hanging men by their thumbs for hours, and “Riding Morgan’s Mule,” which consisted of sitting on a narrow and sharpened edge of a horizontal two-by-four suspended from four to twelve feet off the ground. Guards would hang buckets of dirt and rock from a prisoner’s feet to increase the pain.

The death rate for Union prisoners was 8.4 percent, while it was 11.9 percent for Confederate prisoners.

Official U.S. Policy on Confederate POWs

“Rebel prisoners in our hands are to be subjected to a treatment finding its parallels only in the conduct of savage tribes and resulting in the death of multitudes by the slow but designed process of starvation and by mortal diseases occasioned by insufficient and unhealthy food and wanton exposure of their persons to the inclemency of the weather.”

Preamble to the H.R. 97, passed by both Houses, January 1865

Captain Wirz was executed for conditions beyond his control, while the Yankees faced no charges for the intentional cruelty of Confederate prisoners.

It really does matter who writes the history.

-By Jeff Paulk,
Oklahoma Division Commander
Sons of Confederate Veterans

The post It Matters Who Writes the History appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I didn’t expect Civil War to be a good movie. I watched it because I wanted to see the full scene where the photographers found themselves somewhere in the South and were confronted by the guy from Breaking Bad about their species of American. To be honest, it’s the only part worth watching. It doesn’t disappoint too much, either. This is the best partial clip I could find:

I’ve never done anything illegal, and I’d never advocate for you to do anything illegal. However, please don’t spend money to see Civil War because it’s retarded. The villain in the clip is the Left’s wet dream of what we’d like to be doing, but there’s no explanation of who he’s fighting, or even why. That’s the premise of the entire movie.

Essentially, it’s white men fighting each other in various scenes for no discernible point, either in terms of ideology or why in a strategic sense, these would be suitable locations for pitched battle. There are a few blacks. For instance, the president is the guy from Parks and Recreation, but he’s executed by a black female commando after the shock troops of the “Western Alliance” fight their way into the Oval Office at the end. She also executes some black female agent who tries to negotiate safe passage for the president. The villain in the clip above is filling up a mass grave, but I only spotted one black body.

The alliance which takes DC consists of Texas and California (WTF?!!!). Of course, Charlottesville is mentioned, but as the frontline somehow while DC is about to fall. This is very shitlib thinking. Look at a map of this region, why not hold Staunton to the west out in the Valley in order dominate the juncture of Interstates 81 and 64?

In the context of modern warfare, the conflict in Ukraine has demonstrated that holding strategic points on favorable ground which has been fortified and manned with determined resistance can hold back a force with overwhelming firepower for years on end.

Why didn’t the federal forces make a stand at the Rockfish Gap Entrance for Shenandoah National Park at the top of Afton Mountain where 64 crosses down into the valley, providing the route over the mountains into the heart of Virginia, which would need to be held in order to launch an offensive on DC? The offensive of the Western Alliance would be coming from the west, right? Making a stand at Charlottesville would make no sense, while enfilade fire from the commanding heights of Afton Mountain could turn the stretch of 64 down in the valley into a highway of death.

Both the north/south corridors from 81 and 95 would have to be under control in order to invest this cursed capital. Or, maybe they’d just strike through West Virginia and Maryland using 270 as their connection for an operation to subdue the Beltway, thereby providing the federal forces with multiple venues for attacking the besiegers from behind in order to relieve DC? But still, why would Charlottesville so much further to the south be of any importance? If you try to do some armchair Erwin Rommel, the retardation of the plot is staggering.

This aside, America is only in a state of sporadic mayhem and blacks are participating in virtually none of this mayhem? Where are they? Hunkered down at home playing Scrabble? There are lot of blacks virtually everywhere in proximity of DC, not to mention inside the city itself. Did they all become Quakers and refuse to participate in the hostilities? When have they ever turned down an opportunity to loot a place to the bone (by “bone”, I mean books, sunblock, and greeting cards)?

Anyways, how does America break into a state of civil war along some sort of distinct geography? The fault lines in this country are all deliberately racial. Moreover, in terms of ZOG and global sodomy, none of its white servants have the courage of their convictions. Those who provide the military muscle are doing so ostensibly for Uncle Sam but there’s also the pension and the paycheck. In this movie, the dollar is basically worthless, only Canadian money counts.

Without the fake rationales and financial incentives, nobody is going to fight for any of the evils we rail against at this publication. Antifa is a bunch of drug addled lunatics who are paid and protected to attack peaceful demonstrators. They’re not going to fight against soldiers who can shoot them dead in a war over ideology. So, why would any white men be fighting each other in this scenario? Was DC softened up by volunteer Anal Assault Battalions, raised in San Francisco and Austin, before the commandos went in for the coup de grace?

How are fragile networks for just-in-time logistics functioning? It would be great to have a ample supply of booze and cigarettes like the Brazilian photographer does in the movie, but come on. The food part is where everything would come undone. Nobody’d be able to organize beyond raiding parties probably, and mostly on foot. How are these warring factions sustaining complex mechanical warfare on a military industrial base scattered all over America thanks to bribing congressmen? Is there even a single munition in the American arsenal manufactured entirely in one locale?

During the coming collapse, I’d love to be out there on the road stopping cosmopolitan assholes who think they can take photos and ask what kind of Americans they are, and just ask, of course… but I’m too cynical to have ever once considered this scenario. The mind of a libtard is something to behold, so I guess that’s what this movie has going for it.

The post Civil Farce appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

As advocates for the truth, we’ve got certain rhetorical factors working in our favor. One is the absurdity of the narratives, and the second is that these narratives are the best that servants of our evil system can employ in an attempt to placate public opinion. Moreover, it’s a task that eventually becomes impossible since this system abuses and exploits the public. By design, it produces bad results which keep getting worse.

For instance, the aviation industry is the opening stages of a safety crisis fueled by a combination of DEI policies and demographic decline. This is alarming and unprecedented.

Biden Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg blames airplane turbulence on "the effects of climate change" pic.twitter.com/ieIoMnzDww

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) May 26, 2024

What’s the solution? Trot out the furtive sodomite, who kidnapped twin newborn boys, to blame it on climate change. Apparently, around 50% of Americans believe that we’re all going to die as a result of climate change. That seems pretty high to me and sounds like more narrative propaganda, but far less than 50% of Americans could even label 25 of our 50 states on a blank map. So, maybe yeah. That would still leave half the country, though.

Half of Americans think climate change will destroy planet in their lifetime: poll https://t.co/UpRJcHLrKg pic.twitter.com/xsRpGvmahT

— New York Post (@nypost) May 20, 2024

Skeptical Americans comprehend that the weather has been having adverse effects on human populations since as far back as these can be documented. Many are old enough to remember that the hoax began as global warming but then the polar icecaps didn’t melt, so it was switched to climate change. The new term can be applied to any weather condition, which is quite obvious.

This narrative would be more effective if it could be controlled so that only experts would be weighing in on things that the average person doesn’t understand, like the chemical composition of the atmosphere. The opacity would provide an element of plausibility.

Instead, everybody offers their two cents to boost the narrative. That’s how these outrageous narratives work and thus why they haven’t succeeded. Having idiots and self-righteous monsters harangue skeptics didn’t work with the COVID injections. A similar dynamic is at play with climate change.

NEW – Co-host of an ABC show blamed Monday's solar eclipse and Friday's earthquake in New Jersey on "climate change."https://t.co/4au4oidyX6

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) April 9, 2024

The animus of the climate change narrative, just like all of the other narratives, is blatantly against white people, and white men in particular. The issue it runs into is that this is the segment of the American population most adept at various technical and scientific matters while also being capable of grasping that financial issues, such as rampant inflation, aren’t driven by climate change.

It’s also clear we’re being propagandized not to reproduce because we’re causing climate change while the West is flooded with dangerous, unproductive refuse under the pretext we’re not reproducing enough. Across the West, significant majorities of national populations want this flooding to stop to some degree with many desiring a complete halt. Nothing any politician says, except for promising to stop the flood, pleases these majorities but that’s not part of the narrative.

How bullshit is this government climate report?

Not only does it blame recent inflation on climate change, but also domestic violence and segregation. pic.twitter.com/Yq2EuOelXe

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) November 14, 2023

This system finds itself confronted with an inability to address existential problems. In fact, it causes these problems that disconcert Americans. If not by narrative, how are they going to be placated? During COVID, everyone was getting free money and exemptions from paying for things like rent. This option isn’t on the table anymore, supposedly due to inflation caused by climate change. Quality of life continues to decline as the problems escalate.

In other words, as the situation deteriorates its servants can only turn up the bullshit. That’s not a sustainable dynamic. Although, like I pointed out already, it at least makes pointing out the truth easier. While I sip my coffee in the mornings, I come across so much official absurdity that it’s tough to feel inspiration for lampooning it anymore.

The post Mollify ‘Murica? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Over the past several months, and especially since she was fired by Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens has been on a bit of a crusade, posting about some of the most taboo subjects on the Right – namely what happened to Dresden during World War II and how few Russians led the “Russian” Revolution. In her tweets on these subjects, she explicitly called the actions of the Soviets a “Christian Genocide.” This is a term that I have seen some on the Authentic Right take umbrage with, as it shifts the emphasis to religion when they see it as a matter of race. So, instead of a “Christian Genocide,” we really have a “White Genocide.” And while I do understand their basic point, our enemies have targeted all White nations for extermination, from Christian Dixie to secular Sweeden – I do think the term “Christian Genocide” is more accurate as it more deeply cuts into the heart of the matter. Before I begin with my reasoning, I want to make a few points:

1. I support working with legitimate black leadership (the best we can) to ensure peaceful relations between the races.
2. While I have some reservations with her, what Candace Owens has done is very brave and we should be willing to recognize this.
3. Whatever one may want to say about her, this should end the debate about her being “paid off.” Paid off people simply do not do this. The Corporate Right will support many things – homosexuals, transexuals, abortionists, and so on – what they will not support is a critic of Jewish power.
4. It is undeniably a good thing that her vast audience not only knows about these things, but also feels they can discuss them. We will never break Jewish power otherwise. Dissident rightwingers should look beyond step one and think of the possibilities this now opens. Even five years ago, someone with her following saying these things would have been unthinkable.
5. In the course of this article, the Jews will come up. I do not mean to indicate that every last Jew is a bad person. Judah P. Benjamin served this country. But as a race, and their leadership, they have a terrible animosity and hatred toward us. They will be the focus of this article.

To understand why I think “Christian Genocide” is a more accurate term than “White Genocide,” we have to understand why the Jews hate the White race. It is not for some random, unknown reason and it is not because the Romans expelled them from Palestine. They hate the White race because they first hated Christianity, and before that, Christ. Our Lord explicitly said this would happen: “If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.” (John 15:18)

Jews are unlike the Chinese or Indians; in that they have in their hearts a longing for a Messiah – something I think God placed there to prepare them for the coming of Christ. But when the Messiah came, the Jewish nation split. A minority accepted Christ and became the early Church. However, the majority rejected Him and became the religion we now call “Judaism.” The “Judaism” of Moses, Ellijah, and King David no longer exists. Yet that longing for the Messiah remained, but as with the majority at the time of Our Lord’s earthly ministry, they were searching for an earthly, political salvation. They were looking to save the world by the efforts of men, a search that would, over the centuries, eventually lead to Marxism.

With this search for secular salvation also came a hatred of Christianity. They picked Barabbas. They asked that the Lord’s blood be on them and on their children. And because Europe and its diaspora has been responsible for more missionary activity than anywhere else on earth, this led to a hatred of the White race. Had history turned out differently and Asia, rather than Europe, led the missionary efforts to evangelize the world, they would hate Asians with an equal ferocity that they hate Europeans. This is why they have worked so hard to make Christmas a secular holiday. This is why they have worked to remove the symbols of the Christian West from the public sphere. Yes, they have worked to remove the Traditional West, but all of this goes back to their anti-Christian mindset. They hate Christ. The Talmud contains unspeakable blasphemies depicting Our Lady as a whore and declaring that Our Lord is boiling in feces. Remember that before they hated you, they hated Christ first.

By understanding the roots of their hatred of the White race, we can better address the problem. It is true that the victims of the gulags and Dresden were killed for being White, but on a deeper level, it is because they were Christians. It really was a Christian Genocide.

-By Dixie Anon

The post Christian Genocide or White Genocide? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Actual pandemics among humans occur in conjunction with malnutrition or a lack of modern sanitation and hygiene, but usually both. COVID wasn’t a pandemic. Simply classifying nearly everyone who died as dying of COVID didn’t constitute proof of a pandemic. It did, however, prove some unnerving concepts.

First, that Western politicians will carry out any task assigned without mercy, regard to human life, or even the consequences that might later accrue to them personally as a result of their actions. Second, that at least half of the population lacks the ability to think for itself.

In other words, they’ll believe something that doesn’t make any sense if it’s disseminated to them by an expert or authority figure. Others will accept absurdity if it’s marketed to them as what the moral and intelligent people have concluded because this is what they want to feel about themselves.

NEW – AstraZeneca Covid vaccine is being withdrawn worldwide.https://t.co/RdRtocfu7k

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) May 7, 2024

Now that COVID has been exposed as a fraud, and the vaccines turned out to be totally ineffective and actually quite dangerous, none of us who refused and tried to warn others against getting injections are any more credible with these segments of the population than we were before it started. Nobody who was full of self-righteousness about forcing these injections on us is feeling introspection or remorse, either. They’ve just moved on and stopped talking about it.

This ability to simply move on and not apply information from the past to inform your present decision-making process clearly goes in conjunction with an inability to think for oneself. We see this everywhere, from the polar ice caps that should’ve already melted to all of the military victories that were supposed to be achieved but turned into spectacular debacles. In terms of assessing what’s going right now, it’s as if none of this ever happened for the types of people I’ve described above.

The other issue is the lack of accountability for anyone responsible. I was cynical enough to understand that one right from the start. Please don’t get your hopes up that Republicans in Congress are going to hold anyone accountable for anything. I’ve long ago surmised that their accountability will be delivered in the form of flames as they burn in hell for eternity.

Explosive emails show top NIH adviser deleted records, used ‘secret’ back channels to help Fauci evade COVID transparency https://t.co/qmGlXbUtXx pic.twitter.com/8iMPYgjJ2g

— New York Post (@nypost) May 22, 2024

In fact, the culprits are moving forward with a pandemic treaty. From the Better World Campaign:

In the wake of some of the hardest months of the COVID-19 pandemic, all 194 countries that comprise WHO convened the second-ever “special session” of the World Health Assembly. Their December 2021 gathering aimed to explore how WHO could best enshrine lessons learned from the pandemic to advance smart policy and sound prevention measures.

As a result of the meeting, participating countries unanimously agreed to establish an International Negotiating Body (INB) to pursue development of a new international agreement to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.

In other words, the experts and respectable leaders who turned out to be dead wrong are applying all of the lessons they didn’t learn from COVID to codify a new instrument of dystopia. If you find this disconcerting, that’s because of misinformation and conspiratorial claims. Here they are debunked:

CLAIM: An accord will give WHO total authority in future public health emergencies, including allowing WHO to establish vaccine passports, regulate travel, require lockdowns, infringe on civil liberties, and interfere on matters of national sovereignty.

FACT: Members of WHO are sovereign countries, and participation in any instrument is voluntary. The terms of an agreement will be decided by those countries through a long, collaborative negotiation process, not by WHO.

CLAIM: WHO is seeking “police power” to enforce the terms of any new pandemic instrument.

FACT: Any notion of a WHO-led force to ensure compliance would fall outside of the scope of the organization’s mandate and constitution.

The WHO is a coordination mechanism, it doesn’t have the apparatus to take any of these actions against the population. So, it’s debunked in the sense that the WHO wouldn’t be doing any of this stuff to us. Governments would be doing it, just like last time. The difference is that all of the governments would be taking uniform actions against their populations and that travel would be restricted based on a global plan rather than whatever country the traveler was trying to enter like last time.

Americans tended to have it easier than other locations where people were placed on house arrest and put into gulags. I was thrown into a gulag on a foreign military base whereas, once I got back to the United States, the CDC merely sent me a text message suggesting I quarantine myself at home. I didn’t follow this suggestion or any of its other suggestions.

So probably, the federal government wants to take more forceful actions against us the next time around and they want to be able to say that it’s because of international protocols instead of things being different in every state. It’s a big challenge to lock people down in one area and telling them it’s for their own good while they can see that people are free in another area and not dropping like flies.

Please bear in mind that these are the same experts and respectable leaders who did this to us the last time around and keep harping about bovine flatulence melting the polar ice caps. Don’t put anything past them because it’s too stupid or insane. They’ve established quite an excellent track record for this sort of thing.

Moreover, much of this document seems to be about controlling information and climate change with the justification that these are threats to public health. The fact that people could form their own opinions during COVID and didn’t trust the authorities had them about to blow a gasket during COVID. So, if they’re going to pull off another pandemic, that can’t be allowed this time around.

Dr.Tedros & The World Health Organisation don’t want you eating meat – they want you switching to a plant based diet.

“Transforming food systems is therefore essential”

The Pandemic accord covers all manner of food & climate based scripture in which The WHO seek to gain… pic.twitter.com/e2To2lPPBX

— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) May 18, 2024

If we’ve learned anything since 2019, it’s that when these experts and respectable leaders have to come out at say they’re not going to do something, this is because they’re going to do it. Biden said nobody would be forced to take the vaccine and then forced anyone who wanted to keep their federal job or job at a company that did business with the federal government to take it. When they then feel compelled to say that they’re not going to strip us of our freedom and human rights, this is exactly what they intend to do.

They also don’t learn from their mistakes. If they learned from COVID, they’d understand that there’s a significant percentage of the population which is never going to allow itself to be injected. That percentage would be even bigger if they try it again. It doesn’t matter what nonsense you try to feed us or what threats are made. However, they keep saying another pandemic is going to happen.

Another pandemic is ‘absolutely inevitable’, says Patrick Vallance https://t.co/hZ0ZyUL0Ui

— Guardian Science (@guardianscience) May 25, 2024

This has been part of the narrative from the start. Nobody was saying that COVID was a unique event or that we’d only have to get two injections. It was always that this was going to become a regular thing and so would the injections.

NOW – Biden: "There's gonna be another pandemic."pic.twitter.com/VgfNWgI8k2

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) June 21, 2022

It wouldn’t be a surprise if this next pandemic coincides with economic and financial turmoil from the U.S. dollar, Trump losing another rigged election and being sent to prison, and Russia’s defeat of the entire U.S. global apparatus in Ukraine. Plenty of unpleasantries are on the horizon for which another pandemic would be useful to the Rules-Based International Order.

That being said, it’d be a really bad idea to try and do one again after COVID failed so thoroughly but this might not be a part of the calculus. In the past, we were told what was going to happen beforehand under the pretense that it was merely a possibility rather than something that would happen as a result of deliberate actions.

A global pandemic exercise dubbed Event 201 was staged right before COVID, so if they’re saying another pandemic is inevitable while passing a pandemic treaty and preparing vaccines for a bird flu pandemic that hasn’t happened, I’d say things aren’t looking very good. They’re not going to just leave us alone, that’s for sure.

The post Round Two? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Toward the end of Dante’s Inferno, there is a dreadful place called COCYTUS.

This is the final level of hell.

It is a miserable place, and one that Dante can only come to after travelling through all of hell that precedes it.

The path Dante must take to reach the lowest level of hell, found deep inside the Earth.As you read Dante’s Inferno, you come to understand (through human reason and divine guidance) the pathway to hell (sin).

One thing about the book that I have always found immensely interesting is Dante’s placement of specific sins within hell. It is not like how we would understand sin in the modern day. We would likely choose radically different levels of hell than Dante did.

But this placement provides clues to the mindset of our ancestral Europeans for that timeframe in history.

That timeframe was, of course, nearing the height of Christendom itself.

It is worth us knowing these details to know our heritage. And, as you will see, how far our mindset has drifted from that (better) tradition.

I could write an entire book about this subject. To keep this article short enough that it will actually be read, let’s narrow our topic of interest to the lowest level of hell. Who goes there and why?

Dante begins his journey into hell.The first groups you meet in COCYTUS (circle nine, Canto XXXII) are those that have committed what Dante calls “compound fraud”.

John Ciardi (without hesitation my favorite translator of Dante’s Inferno into English, do not bother with anyone else) explains what this means (emphasis my own):

At the bottom of the well Dante finds himself on a huge frozen lake. This is COCYTUS, the NINTH CIRCLE, the fourth and last great water of Hell, and here, fixed in the ice, each according to his guilt, are punished sinners guilty of TREACHERY AGAINST THOSE TO WHOM THEY WERE BOUND BY SPECIAL TIES. The ice is divided into four concentric rings marked only by the different positions of the damned within the ice.

This is Dante’s symbolic equivalent of the final guilt. The treacheries of these souls were denials of love (which is God) and of all human warmth. […] As they denied God’s love, so are they furthest removed from the light and warmth of His Sun. As they denied all human ties, so are they bound only by the unyielding ice.

In the first of four rounds (Caïna), you meet those treacherous to Kin. It is named for Cain, who killed his blood brother Abel.

Dante and Virgil reviewing the punishment of the ninth circle of hell, Caïna and Antenora. Canto XXXII.Further down in round two of that same level, we meet those Treacherous to Country (in Antenora).

You only have two other rounds (3. Ptolomea and 4. Judecca – Treachery to Masters, wherein Judas Iscariot lies), and then you arrive at the center of the ice, which is Satan himself.

Antenora is explained by Ciardi as follows:

The second round is ANTENORA, named for Antenor, the Trojan who was believed to have betrayed his city to the Greeks. Here lie those guilty of TREACHERY TO COUNTRY. They too, have their heads above the ice, but they cannot bend their necks, which are gripped by the ice. Here Dante accidentally kicks the head of BOCCA DEGLI ABBATI and then proceeds to treat him with a savagery he has shown to no other soul in Hell.

Dante and Virgil talk with a damned soul in ANTENORA sentenced to compound fraud for betraying his nation. Canto XXXIII.Pause for a second and contemplate that hierarchy.

Dante placed those who betray their own family in better conditions than whose who betray their own “country” (which, in Dante’s concept, is more accurately defined as “nation” or “blood people—kin”).

It was even worse to be treacherous to your nation than your own family. All other sins paled in comparison, aside from the latter two rounds (of similar treachery) that I mentioned above. Every other sin was punished less.

Many of us may not necessarily ascribe to Dante’s theological beliefs. I’m not a medieval Catholic, so I don’t. But there’s much to be said about his organization of the levels of hell. Especially regarding the overall trend of Western Civilization.

It’s a clue for why Western Civilization was so strong and why it is now so weak.

We noticed here that Dante put those who are traitors to King and Country in the lowest possible level of hell. National traitors are even lower than the corrupt popes, the thieves, the wrathful, lustful, and sodomites. Even religious false prophets like Muhammed only make it to the eighth circle of hell!

But those that betray their country or Kin? The ninth circle of hell. Near Satan himself.

This was not a mistake. This was intentional. Because Dante recognized the damage that is done to entire nations by those who are a part of them, but act treacherously toward them. They lead others into the other sins through the destruction of the nation. They destroy Christendom, which is Christ’s kingdom on Earth. The punishment matches the crime.

This goes to show you the medieval conception of how important kin, ethnically similar people, and the idea of a nation-state were.

Christendom did not have modernity’s perversion of a country or nation. The nation-state was not some economic zone. Neither was it some general free-for-all where any person could just immigrate and join.

There were blood ties, and these were incredibly important. To fail to live up to them could end up with you in the literal lowest circle of hell.

The people, all unique peoples, were united by blood. And to betray it was to relegate your soul to the same level as Satan himself.

This was traditional nationalism. The concept that many modern “Christians” now balk against in their acquiescence to what is culturally and wordly expedient. But the truth is that every educated Christian is a Christian Nationalist, because that is what God commands us to be. We have two thousand years of Christian history to back that up. The Christian Globalists only have one hundred years of modernity’s lies.

The center of the Ninth Circle COCYTUS is Satan himself, encased in Ice. Those sentenced to the ninth circle share the same ice as Satan.You want to know why Western Civilization was so strong? It is because of this mindset right here. We had the tools built into us to survive and thrive.

You can see it through the blood loyalty that Dante shows so clearly and so strongly through his organization of who goes where in hell.

What a powerful testimony to our true Christian European heritage.

Dante would put those who betray our people so harshly in the modern era next to Satan himself in hell.

Even most dissidents don’t share the same level of contempt for our TRAITORS TO COUNTRY. But we should. That’s how we invigorate our true heritage back into us.

Dante is not the only one that gives us a hint at what true blood unity used to look like throughout history. It is evident in many of the great literary works of Christendom. I just cannot think of a classical literature that shows it more plainly than Dante’s inferno.

This unity was stripped from us. Mostly due to the enlightenment. But certainly other factors had their place as well.

So, what do we do with this information?

Read the Bible. Stop having others tell you about it. Read the real history of Christendom. Stop having others teach you about it. Read Dante’s Comedia and other literary works to understand the mindset of our people throughout history.

If you do this, you will quickly recognize that they all are nothing like how modernity portrays any of them. We live in a wicked, corrupted age. The only way you can find the truth is to seek it yourself.

Through this, you will see that Western Civilization was never as weak as it is now.

In fact, it was incredibly strong, which is why we dominated for so many centuries.

Weakness, fragility, tolerance, and the betrayal of our own people because “we’re all human!11!” is a new modern concept. This was never allowed to exist during the Age of Christendom. It only came about from the Age of Lies.

Throughout our history, we had national unity. And we can have it again.

But we must return to the only thing that can truly preserve it, which is our heritage mindset and Christianity. The strong-willed kind that Dante understood.

Because it is only this belief that understands the importance of blood ties. We must love our neighbors, and Dante shows us the importance of blood in that neighborly calculation.

I encourage all of my readers to adopt the mindset of Dante in this case. When you think of those who betray their kin and their country, you should imagine them going to the ninth circle of hell. To be near Satan himself.

A just punishment for the crime committed.

If Western Civilization is to survive, we have to bring back the love of nation and embed it into the minds of our people once again.

The post Dante’s Inferno: The Medieval Importance of Nation appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I have been asked this question, and here is what Merriam-Webster says:

“not reconciled to some political, economic, or social change

an unreconstructed rebel

also: holding stubbornly to a particular belief, view, place, or style

an unreconstructed hard-liner”

In the SCV, to be Unreconstructed is to live “The Charge,” as stated by Lt. General Stephen Dill Lee, and to not conform to Yankee ideology and terminology. Did you call your noon meal today “lunch,” and your evening meal “dinner”? Then, you are reconstructed. Do you say the Pledge of Allegiance (written by a socialist) at every opportunity? Then, you are reconstructed.

As descendants of fine Confederate stock, we should resist with every fiber of our being the Yankee indoctrination which has “reconstructed” the vast majority of the South. If our Confederate ancestors could come back today and see how we act and what we say, would they be proud, or ashamed? They fought to prevent the very mess we are living in today, and where did that mess come from? Yankee invaders. Remember, the Yankees sought to remake us in their image. They called the Southerner “backward, uneducated rubes.” They brought their factories and industry into our South and did away with much of the agrarian life which was the way of life of so many of our ancestors. They changed the way Southerners talk, act, and think. They have taught generations of Southern children that their ancestors were traitors who “fought to preserve slavery.” The carpetbaggers came in and fleeced the South, stealing homes, farms, and land with their massive tax increases, causing many families to lose all they had at county auctions.

Why would you want to emulate such a detestable class of people? Don’t do it. Think about the sacrifices our Confederate ancestors made in defending their homes and families from the invading Empire of barbarian murderers. We should “hold stubbornly” to the beliefs and ways of our Confederate ancestors, our heritage, and our history, because they were right. Some of the resistance will come easily. Some of it will take some work. We all have to shuck off the indoctrination which has polluted our beautiful South for many decades. We need to put Unreconstructed people into our city councils and onto our school boards. Then, we will start to see things change for the better.

It won’t happen overnight, but if you make a conscious effort not to conform to the Yankee indoctrination, you can do it. Let us strive to be someone our Confederate ancestors would be proud of.

Now, it’s time for supper.

– By Jeff Paulk

Oklahoma Division Commander

Sons of Confederate Veterans

The post What is “Unreconstructed”? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Personally, I understand a lot of things that happen in other people’s personal lives. What’s going on in their life might never have happened in my life, but I can intuit how circumstances lead to a particular course of action. As whatever is left of a society, I think we mostly tend to get these sorts of things.

For example, if a woman’s boyfriend is a crackhead and he’s behaving erratically while brandishing a loaded pistol. This tends to scare any woman, and most women don’t know much about firearms. So, if an upper class white woman confiscates her crackhead’s pistol while he’s passed out and tosses it in a public trash can, I can pretty much understand she did as best she could to diffuse the situation.

Hunter Biden’s ex-wife, sister-in-law-turned-lover to take witness stand in his gun trial https://t.co/nFRpsEMUCF pic.twitter.com/4Eq2xllrMt

— New York Post (@nypost) May 21, 2024

Most readers of this publication are proficient with firearms, technical aspects, safety protocols, and the various legal strictures. Many have themselves a redneck woman who knows these sorts of things too, or at least is unalarmed at the sight of a firearm. This isn’t a helpful context to grasp with what was going on with Hunter Biden.

What’s important for y’all to bear in mind is that upper class white people, women in particular, are often startled at the sight of a firearm. Just because it’s an unloaded, inanimate object doesn’t nullify the psychological impact. It sounds ridiculous, but let me assure you it’s a real phenomenon.

There’s a lot of stuff going on with Hunter Biden. Ukraine, the CIA, etc. The Russians are now accusing him of financing terrorism. I’m not really sure what to make out of all of it. He did like to party, though. Various women aren’t cheap, so I can understand this one as well.

I think his life would make for a good movie, maybe with Christian Bale starring as Hunter Biden. There’s plenty of great montages to make out of him high on crack, such as driving to Vegas at over 100mph. The montages are one of my favorite things about Stallone’s movies from back in the 80’s.

Hunter Biden hooker payments (not seasonally adjusted) pic.twitter.com/q2th47kBGV

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) December 8, 2023

When he showed up to Congress for that bizarre hearing last year, a Republican congresswoman accused him of having “no balls.” Various women can attest that he does have balls, and this entire country has seen the photos at this point, whether we wanted to or not. His crack binges with various women are famous across the planet, actually.

As far as we know, he didn’t shoot anybody. For a country faced with an existential set of problems, this doesn’t seem like one to me. This is probably why the Republicans fixate on him, since they’re going to do nothing about anything dragging us beneath the toilet water.

People get shot every day in America, so it’s unclear to me why Hunter Biden matters in that context. He didn’t even shoot himself on accident, I’d say the man can handle a pistol. He’s nothing if not a survivor.

I think it’s time to add another face on Mount Rushmore. Some of the writers from the Identity Dixie crew know me quite well, and they’d all tell you how fond I am of black people. One of them sent me the tragic story above. He said to me, “Tom, I know how much you care about black people, and this might be pretty tough for you to handle, but I think you ought to check it out.“

It’s an awful story. The amount of potential this young man had really makes it sting. China and Russia are teaming up to build a lunar base powered by a nuclear reactor, so we’re really going to need young scholars like him to finish their studies if we’re going to remain relevant as a nation in a world defined by technological progress.

It would appear that when he put the gun to his head while telling his audience “fuck y’all n**s” he didn’t realize that the safety was off or maybe he put in an empty clip without realizing a round was chambered. I’m not sure what happened, but I found it extremely disconcerting.

His tragic demise seems to be part of a broader trend of blacks brandishing firearms while rapping and accidentally shooting themselves, friends, and family members live on the internet. They start young, too. A toddler executed his mother live on Zoom.

Black people often lead very colorful lives and have a wonderful sense of theatricality. That’s why they like to film themselves live on the internet. I wouldn’t characterize them as pacifists, but it’s quite perplexing how much wanton violence occurs when the combination of firearms, social media, and black people come together. Must be systemic racism, although it would probably require a woman of color with a PhD to come up with an exact diagnosis.

It’s like death stalks them, waiting for the silliest moment to strike. Don’t count on Republicans to figure out what’s getting all these promising young black people killed, they’re too busy fixating on Hunter Biden.

The post Rounds, to the head appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

My dear brothers and sisters, as you make your way into the future, toward an independent Dixie, the greatest thing you must have is faith. Faith is the substance of things hoped for and evidence of things not seen. Our belief in a Free Dixie is not a wisp of wind nor an ember in the dark; it is not a hopeless dream of daydreamers, lost and without substance.

Rather, our faith in an independent South is a hurricane-level wind that could put a smile on the face of a true Floridian. For in the midst of such a downpour, Florida Man sees tangible evidence the aquifer that spans the great length of his state will be full of pure, clean water to sustain his people and his land into the future. And on those occasions when lightening strikes and the forest begins to burn – though the suffering is real – he knows the rage of the fire will cleanse and resurrect the land, making it more fruitful for his progeny.

So, how can you have the force of a hurricane? How can you have the cleansing effect of the fire? Well, you can start by being vocal, like the Fire-Eaters of old! And, in your voice, be unapologetic. For if you are timid when the wind and the fire of change is in our favor, it will be your failure, and all momentum will be lost.

For instance, in several conversations, with both people of influence and those of potential influence, I’ve pushed the argument that the Republican Party and its hold on our people must be destroyed. I’ve demanded with my words and tone that it is not, nor has it ever been, a benefit to our people, for it is the party of our conqueror, the Yankee party. And to my astonishment, their agreement was overwhelming. Had it just been this one conversation, you could dismiss it as Southern politeness. However, these talking points have made it into the mainstream. Even Tucker Carlson is speaking on how the Republican Party must be destroyed. Identity Dixie has been pushing that theme for nearly a decade, and now it’s in the wild.

While greeting the brethren after a Lord’s Day service, a young man standing with his beautiful wife dispiritedly said, “There has to be more than just paying bills and dying.” This sentiment is very similar to an old ID meme, and was recently translated into the opening line of a very popular song, “You weren’t born to just pay bills and die.” Of course, I agreed with the young man, and encouraged him to stop looking to Washington for answers, and to stop thinking of himself as anything other than a Southerner. With his wife looking on, and obviously engaged, I mentioned that his children deserve a better future than he was given. With both astonished by my boldness (but still engaged), I asked him, “What are going to do?” His honest and humble answer was that he would do what he could; to which I exhorted him to do just that, to the point of exhaustion.

Be the wind and the fire; be the storm and the rage. History is proceeding quicker than we could have ever imagined. Our enemies are on their heels, and are being attacked on multiple fronts. Come out of your daydream! Dream with your eyes wide open and your voice thundering!

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post Wind and Fire! appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

As America circles the drain, I wish to be entertained. Honestly, I’d settle for something which injects enough fear, distaste, or morbid curiosity into my psyche to avoid going about my day with a general sense of resignation and indifference.

I’ve heard that hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way, but I grew up with the WWF, Waco, and eventually 9/11. I also have an appreciation for the horrific gravity of our situation, so some nonsense from 90’s trash TV is insufficient for my entertainment. This wouldn’t even have been good enough to make the 2PM slot back in 1997:

This video lays out what happened in tonight’s heated exchange in the oversight hearing pic.twitter.com/7QTmpsa1eA

— Acyn (@Acyn) May 17, 2024

Yeah, this would’ve been woefully inadequate for decent episode of The Maury Povich Show where he’d bring on the Goyim to berate them as they’d trade insults with each other over paternity tests, and other various topics that plagued high society.

In those heady days, one could tune into a fine selection of shows such as Baywatch, Walker: Texas Ranger, Renegade, and Hercules: The Legendary Journeys. If you had something to do with your life, you usually weren’t even home when the talk shows were on. Still, they were as hard to escape as CNN is today.

The only decent character from this tiresome legislative fray was the committee chairman from Kentucky, a Mr. Comer, who I’m assuming is just another hapless Republican. To be honest, I can’t even care enough to look up what the committee was doing exactly, but it was arguing about Donald Trump which then went into the sort of verbal combat you’d expect of a deranged Latina, a proud, intelligent black woman, and Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Unlike Jamie Raskin, the who was grinning to his right, Comer had no inclination to foment an undignified spectacle whereas Raskin lit up just like his fellow Jew, Maury Povich, as soon as things popped off. In terms of the proceeding, Comer seemed to be trying to uphold an objective application of the legal process in a manner befitting the deportment of his forebears. This is such a tiresome Republican trope.

He’s always had my back and been by my side! Can we please show some love to the Gentleman from Maryland, @RepRaskin? pic.twitter.com/dW3gJrOeVV

— Jasmine Crockett (@JasmineForUS) May 20, 2024

Yes, Raskin cares. Just like Povich cared about those deformed kids he brought on for freak shows. Comer’s best two quotes were “A what, now?” with a bewildered expression on his face and while shaking his gray head, “I have no idea what you just said” as these dynamic women traded barbs.

Greene prevailed by admonishing her two opponents to “calm down,” which is going to escalate any irate female. It’s worked for me every time, especially when I was genuinely trying to calm a female down. America’s dignity rots beneath dirt. There’s no victory to be scored over a corpse, so the glory belongs to Greene I suppose.

Women can’t be saved from themselves these days, but entertainment always used to feature men rescuing women from other men. This was something to which everyone could relate, since women feel independent until the second they’re scared or something goes wrong with their car. When you can relate to something, it resonates with you and thus adds to the entertainment value.

Indeed, the notion that women are as adept as men at public life proffers little distraction from the grind we all face in this shithole. We have the most diverse selection ever in Congress and all we got was the above vignette. How could that ever measure up to the righteous deeds of Rep. Preston Brooks? These independent women aren’t actually going to throw down. This is why women in Congress don’t entertain much better than the women in the remake of Ghostbusters.

“Will you take the Lord of Darkness as your master and your spouse?“Back to my point, the way women fit appropriately into entertainment is that there’s a male hero, a male villain, and a beautiful female this hero must save from the villain. For example, when the Undertaker abducted Stephanie McMahon in order to marry her.

It was a romantic gesture, in a medieval sort of way, but Stone Cold Steve Austin swooped in to save Stephanie despite his feud with her father. This is one of the last episodes of American chivalry I can recall. Perhaps she’d have had a better life as Mrs. Undertaker, we’ll never really know. It was pretty damn fun to watch, that’s for sure.

The other fundamental problem is that AOC was traumatized by trauma that never happened on the infamous Jan 6th insurrection. The fun which Undertaker would’ve had with Stephanie is strictly a matter of puerile speculation. In regards to AOC and the MAGA rapists who tried to overthrow our democracy, the matter is equally irrelevant. She remains traumatized, nonetheless.

How in the hell then, does anyone sell these congresswomen as Amazons fighting for what’s right? You can’t be fighting for anything while also traumatized by your fantasy that a man in a MAGA hat wanted to have his way with you. AOC’s proud, intelligent black woman ally claims she went into politics because she was the victim of a hate crime which can’t be substantiated in any way. It’s all so tiresome.

Their ringleader, Mr. Raskin, was also traumatized without his safety ever being threatened. So much so that he had to quiver before his fellow legislators to try and process this trauma. If this was a plot, it would be one of the worst plots ever written.

I’m a really optimistic, humanitarian gentleman but I have to admit I can’t see any upside to America these days. I feel so blasé about the entire spectacle.

The post Lame. appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Nearly everywhere you go on the internet, if you see “users” or “comments” engaging with one another, a significant chunk of it is 100% fake.

It is all being placed there to program you into believing a false narrative about what everyone else believes.

Here is one such example from Reddit (two different posts, two different time periods, two entirely similar comments sections) (right click -> view image for full-size):

All of those accounts are bots posting using Artificial Intelligence and programmed scripts. It is social engineering.

The same thing happens in most comment fields of mainstream news (even right-leaning ones like ZeroHedge or Epoch Times).

It even happens with Twitter (now X) accounts:

Top cybersecurity expert claims that more than 80 percent of Twitter accounts are probably bots

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk on Thursday went after Parag Agrawal-led platform once again, after a top cybersecurity expert claimed that as high as eight in 10 Twitter accounts are fake.

Dan Woods, Global Head of Intelligence at cybersecurity company F5, who spent more than 20 years with the US federal law enforcement and intelligence organisations, told The Australian that more than 80 per cent of Twitter accounts are probably bots — a massive claim as Twitter says only 5 per cent of its users are bots/spams.

It’s all fake and gay to manufacture consent from the masses.

I bet there are about nine fake accounts for every one real account online nowadays. Those nine accounts manufacture the likes/favorites and ratios of what goes to the top. Meaning that everything that becomes “popular” ends up there by the strategic decision of the elites. From Reddit to YouTube to your weather websites to your local news and back. It hits everything.

This has been true for at least five years, likely about eight.

This isn’t news to some of you who have heard of Dead Internet Theory before. But for those of you that have not, I encourage you to dive into it.

A good place to start learning is Wikipedia. They claim it is a conspiracy theory, which means you already know it is actually a conspiracy fact:

The dead Internet theory is an online conspiracy theory that asserts that the Internet now consists mainly of bot activity and automatically generated content manipulated by algorithmic curation, minimising organic human activity to manipulate the population. Proponents of the theory believe these bots were created intentionally to help manipulate algorithms and boost search results in order to manipulate consumers. Some proponents of the theory accuse government agencies of using bots to manipulate public perception. The date given for this “death” was generally around 2016 or 2017.

The dead Internet theory has gained traction because many of the observed phenomena are quantifiable, such as increased bot traffic, but the literature does not support the full theory. Caroline Busta, founder of the media platform New Models, was quoted in an article in The Atlantic calling much of the dead Internet theory a “paranoid fantasy”, even if there are legitimate criticisms involving bot traffic and the integrity of the internet, but she said she does agree with the “overarching idea”. In an article in The New Atlantis, Robert Mariani called the theory a mix between a genuine conspiracy theory and a creepypasta.

[…]

The dead Internet theory has two main components: that bots have displaced human activity on the Internet and that actors are employing these bots to manipulate the human population. The first part of this theory, that bots create much of the content on the internet and perhaps contribute more than organic human content, has been a concern for a while, with the original post by “IlluminatiPirate” citing the article “How Much of the Internet Is Fake? Turns Out, a Lot of It, Actually” in New York magazine. The second half of the dead Internet theory builds on this observable phenomenon by proposing that the U.S. government, corporations, or other actors are intentionally employing these bots to manipulate the human population for a variety of reasons. In the original post, the idea that bots have displaced human content is described as the “setup”, with the “thesis” of the theory itself focusing on the United States government being responsible for this, stating: “The U.S. government is engaging in an artificial intelligence powered gaslighting of the entire world population.”

They speak the truth, even if they shroud it in a “conspiracy theory” package.

The takeaway: Don’t believe a single narrative you read online. It’s all likely manufactured. The internet is fully compromised territory at this point. It’s only going to get worse with hardline, workable public AI now.

But hey, for us older folks, at least you got to enjoy a time when it wasn’t like this. When they were still training the bots. We saw all of this coming with the stupid Twitter “i hate texting” bot failures, but now the bots don’t have those public failures anymore. Not because they are gone, but because they are too advanced to catch most of the time now. They blend in too easily.

And at least you still have my website. I’m too small to be of any significance, so you know I’m not a bot. They push up their own, but I’ll always be in the background. If this website ever suddenly becomes mainstream, that is when you’ll know I’m compromised. The elites only let the bots and the gatekeepers to the top anymore. The rest of us share our own hidden hierarchy in the shadows.

It is sad but true: The golden era of the internet is over.

But on the bright side: This means you can stop demoralizing yourself by what you see in comments and articles online. Most of it isn’t even real, anyway.

The post Dead Internet Theory appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

As a Dixian, and more specifically an Alabamian, it is in my blood to prefer college football to the NFL. Still, I do appreciate, and consider myself lucky, that I was able to enjoy the entirety of Tom Brady’s career. I can remember his first Super Bowl victory clearly – he was a slow quarterback who had gotten a ton of lucky breaks, but that luck was about to run out. As the narrative went, the Patriots should not have even been there, it should have been the Oakland Raiders, if not for, as the late, great Rush Limbaugh put it, “a silly interpretation of a bogus rule.” Brady and company were expected to be a mere footnote on Kurt Warner and the St. Louis Rams’ “The Greatest Show on Turf” journey as they cemented their legacy as one of the greatest teams ever assembled. But, Brady proved everyone wrong that year, and as hard as it may be to believe now, it actually took several years for Brady to be recognized as one of the greatest to ever play the game. No player will ever be as good and for as long as Brady.

I bring all this up because his life and the details of his divorce shed light into why an entire generation of young men are so jaded in their interactions with women and have no interest in marriage. You see, his wife of 13 years, Brazilian supermodel Gisele Bündchen, had an affair with her jiu-jitsu instructor, thus ending their marriage. That she did that is terrible enough in and of itself, but what is even more troubling is her rationale – Tom Brady was not spending enough time with her, instead focusing on football. But all of this should have been expected and part of being married to an all-time great. His drive to succeed is legendary, and as such, he keeps on going long after most men would have quit. Say what you will, but this drive is what separates the very good from the illustrious. The history of the NFL is littered with draft busts who had the talent for greatness, but not the drive. Bündchen’s affair revels just how little loyalty she has, and she really expected to be able to marry someone like Brady but have him home all the time. If you want to marry a rich man, you have to deal with a busy man – the “playboy billionaire” is for the realm of fiction, not reality. And yet, a full-grown adult woman could not comprehend this. After many hours of painstaking research, I have come to the conclusion that she is the worst person of German blood to ever live in South America.

But what is most maddening of all is how the media has handled this – the coverage has been largely, and unsurprisingly, sympathetic towards her, acting as if she had a valid point. Gisele Bündchen thought she could have it all, and not have any of the drawbacks that comes with someone like Brady. It’s an incredibly immature attitude, one that is common in young people, but one they also grow out of. And, the Brady divorce is more proof that any discussion of the “patriarchy” is nothing more than a feminist delusion.

This event and the media’s coverage of it is yet another example of why so many young men have no interest in marriage. I dislike the nihilism and hatred of women in the Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) movement, but to act like it came out of the blue and not a result of a system badly stacked against men is simply intellectual dishonesty. For good reason many young men will look at this story and think: “What’s the point? You can be the greatest of all time and your wife will still say it’s not enough and cheat on you. If she does, it will still be all your fault in the eyes of the media. What chance do I have?” And this cannot be dismissed, had Tom Brady had an affair with a 20-something, the media would have erupted. We would be talking about the “agism” women face for the next few weeks and he likely would have lost multiple endorsement deals. Yes, had he violated his wedding vows, there should be consequences for his actions. But, in the America of 2024, those consequences only go one way.

This is not to say that many men could do a whole lot better. I’ve had many conservative women tell me how hard it is to find a stable man who wants a family and is not addicted to either pornography, weed, or video games (if not all three). But I do think this is a consequence of a society that told several generations of men that they could be discarded and said that they were stupid and only could stand in the way of the greatness of girls. This could only go on for so long before serious societal consequences emerged. Yes, women have the right to be distraught how many men only consider them as sex objects rather than as a wife and potential mother, and we should never forget that many women are, in essence, collateral damage in this societal shift. But these “men” are the result of a society that gave them nothing in marriage, so they opted out.

What happened to Tom Brady will only further push men away. The only way to solve this is by forging a society when men once again have a place and are not considered disposable.

The post How to Radicalize a Generation of Young Men appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Where, and when, did the War of Northern Aggression begin? I submit that it did not begin with the firing on Fort Sumter, nor with the illegal invasion of Lincoln’s army. Neither did it end with Lee’s surrender at Appomattox. The seeds of this great contest were sown much earlier than that. No, the War was not about slavery, as we have been wrongly taught since Reconstruction. Unfair and unconstitutional tariffs imposed upon the South were a large issue which resulted in the secession of the first few states. However, to get to the beginning of this needless conflict, we must go back to 1796, just a few short years after our independence had been won from Great Britain.

From Facts and Falsehoods Concerning the War on the South 1861 – 1865, page 96, we see:

“From the “Olive Branch”, published in 1814, and from the Pelham Papers, published in 1796, we learn:

1st. That the Federal leaders of New England, in 1796, advocated disunion, and were eager to get New England to secede from the Union, and to form a Northeastern Confederacy.

2nd. On finding that the common people of New England did not favor secession, did not want disunion, did not dislike the Southern States, and were proud of the Union, the Federal leaders resorted to measures to convert the masses to their views on secession and disunion.

3rd. These measures were of the meanest, the most contemptible character; were a direct and base violation of the Ninth Commandment, “Thou shalt not bear false witness.” Politicians, newspapers, and preachers of New England engaged in the evil work of bearing false witness against the people of the Southern States, whom they painted as “savages”, as “barbarians,” as “demons incarnate,” as unfit to live in the “same Union with the virtuous people of New England.”

On page 97 of Facts and Falsehoods, we read:

“The following extracts from the “Olive Branch” throw light on this subject:

‘The increasing effort to excite the public mind to that feverish state of discord, jealousy, and exasperation, which was necessary to prepare it for the consummation of their desire (the secession of the Eastern States), the unholy spirit which inspired the writers of these dissolution sentiments has been from the hour (1796 to the present 1814) increasingly employed to excite hostility between the different sections of the Union. To such horrible length has this spirit been carried that many paragraphs have appeared in the Boston papers intended to excite the negroes of the South to rise and massacre the whites. This is a species of baseness of which the world has produced few examples.

The baseness was indeed extraordinary in face of the fact that these efforts to instigate negroes to rise and massacre the whites of the South were made while the people of New England were still enriching themselves by carrying on the slave traffic.”

So, while filling their pockets with money from the slave trade, these New Englanders were advocating for blacks in the South to rise up and murder white Southerners. This was not only being printed in the newspapers of New England, but it also was being preached from the pulpits as well. Lies, bearing “false witness” against the South were intended to shape the thinking of the “common people” of New England so that they would despise the South and wish to separate from it.

Bear in mind that those advocating secession and who were slandering the South at this time were of the “Hamiltonian” mindset, meaning that they were in favor of a large, centralized, controlling government and not in favor of States’ rights. They did not view the States as they actually were; free and independent sovereigns bound together with the Constitution for their mutual benefit. The people of the South had the “Jeffersonian” mindset, meaning they were opposed to a controlling government, like the one they had just fought a war to free themselves from, and believed in individual liberty and the independence of each individual State. Also, we must keep in mind that the Northeast was largely Unitarian, meaning they denied the deity of Christ, that He was not the Son of God. This was a huge difference from the beliefs that Southerners held, that Christ is the Son of God, as is taught in the Holy Bible.

On page 102 of Facts and Falsehoods, we read:

“A convention in Ohio in 1859 declared the Constitution was a compact to which each State acceded as a State, and as an integral part, and that each State had the right to judge for itself of infractions and of the mode and measure of redress, and to this declaration Joshua Giddings, Wade, Chase and Dennison assented.”

So, it was common knowledge that as each State had joined the Union, each also had the right to withdraw if it felt that infractions of the Constitution were being suffered, at least until it was actually put into practice by the South.

It’s interesting to note that numerous times from the late 18th century through the first half of the 19th century that the New England States threatened secession, yet no threat of war was made against them to keep them in the Union. No one called them traitors for wanting to secede from the Union. However, we see a completely different picture when the Southern States, who were actually being damaged by the excessive tariffs of the North, seceded to form its own Confederacy. People today call the Confederates “traitors” and accuse them of “treason” for exercising their right to withdraw from the Union. Such people are grossly ignorant of history and the truth.

We have learned here that the seeds of the War were sown many years before either side took up arms. As stated earlier, the War did not end with the surrender of Lee at Appomattox. Yes, the military aspect of the War ended, this is true, but the subjugation, economic, social, and political phases of the North’s war upon the South were just beginning, and I submit to you that they continue right up to the present day in this 21st century.

How can this claim be made? Look at the rewritten propaganda taught in the government schools which is passed off as “history.” All the blame for the War and slavery are laid at the feet of the South, even though it was the New England slave traders who brought the slaves to America while flying Old Glory on their ships. The Confederate Battle Flag is disparaged as being “the flag of slavery,” yet no Confederate flag ever flew on a slave ship. The South must ever be bowing at the stool of repentance, it would seem. What about the war waged by the media, politicians, NAACP, and others against all things Southern and Confederate? Our flags, statues, and monuments are being removed. Schools, streets, and parks are having their names changed to erase any connection with Confederate soldiers. Cultural genocide is being perpetrated against our heritage, history, and heroes. These gallant men were not fighting to preserve and perpetuate slavery. Had they wanted to protect slavery, all they had to do was remain in the Union where it was already protected by the Constitution. The Marxist myths, lies, and propaganda have brainwashed millions over many decades, and it continues today. If everyone knew the truth about our history, we would not be facing this evil campaign to rid our country of memorials to brave, deserving men who fought an illegal invasion, and suffered defeat and subjugation so that the Founders’ dream could be exterminated and replaced with the centralized government which the victors so long desired.

Our Confederate ancestors fought with honor and dignity, careful not to render unto the civilians of the North the same horrors visited upon Southern civilians by the Union army. The attacks upon Southern culture and honor continue through Hollywood stereotyping, misleading and false documentaries on PBS and the History Channel, and outright lies spouted by the media. In the DNA makeup of the true Southerner is the belief that death has no sting like the stain of falsehood, and the certainty of death at any time is preferable to the possibility of dishonor.

As I have told many anti-Confederates who call us “losers,” there is no disgrace in losing if you fought honorably, bravely, and for a just cause. Though the bones of our dead Confederates molder in the bosom of the Earth, the honor and dignity with which they defended their homeland reflect the virtues of the Southern people, and we may confidently hope that their souls will bloom eternally.

-By Jeff Paulk

The post Where It All Began appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Summer 2011. Midway through the week our troop had made it to the championship canoe race between our camp (west) and east camp. We’d beaten out everyone else on our side of the lake to face an unknown opponent for the title of “Canoe Race Champion.” We got our asses kicked. A week of rowing amounted to a furious effort against a team of high schoolers (I was a rising 7th grader and one of the oldest guys in our troop on this campout).

Fast-forward to Summer 2017. I have just finished hiking to the top of Mount Baldy at Philmont, New Mexico. I was on top of the world both literally and metaphorically. I had done so with my actual brother and several men who I also felt a fraternal bond to. It would end up becoming the subject of my college application essay. I reflected on my youth, remembering that I had certainly lost at a lot of things, but I was a winner on that day and many other days.

On May 7th, the Boy Scouts of America officially changed their name from Scouting BSA to Scouting America. This comes seven years after the Scouts announced they were going to allow girls and troons to join, nine years since they decided to allow homosexuals to take leadership roles, and eleven years after the National Council voted to allow homosexual youths (lol) to join. The comment sections were unsurprisingly replete with former Eagle Scouts duking it out with Norwood 5A’s jannies. I wasn’t surprised: the name change was akin to seeing your ghoulish troon cousin four months into HRT at a family gathering after having initially heard the news. But it did cement that there just are no more spaces in American society, or the West writ large, for young men.

Many of you are probably aware of the idea of a mannerbund or Koryos, a roaming warrior band of Indo-European youths. Historians suspect they were responsible (or had a major role) for the conquest of Europe by Indo-European tribes. The concept survived throughout history: both in the military context as societies saw the benefit in their young men and warrior-class forming tight-knit, fraternal bonds as well as in our social and educational context. The fraternity is a great example and was a staple of American elite culture. College used to not be a credentialing mill, believe it or not: it was finishing school for our patricians who would hone their skills in rhetoric, culture, art, science, but most importantly would form a mannerbund with their colleagues at great institutions. Looking at the history of many fraternities you see memberships filled with some of the best and brightest we have had to offer. Astronauts, statesmen, scientists, great military leaders, they may have been gifted with great heritage and the fortune of being born in a far better time but they became men as they served in their various fraternal orgs.

Scouting was a unique development that sprung from the genius of Lord Robert Baden-Powell. He was inspired not only by his experiences policing British South Africa and Matabeleland, but also upon hearing stories of the great American frontiersmen and Natives. Men who forged a nation from a wild, untamed land along with a people who had an almost supernatural connection to the land. The American legend personified. In an age of rapid industrialization where people, especially young men, were becoming divorced from the land this presented as an opportunity to Lord Baden-Powell. Upon his return, he hosted a campout at Brownsea Island – a name still legendary in American scouting – and drew volunteers from the Boys’ Brigade (a similar organization at the time). Lord Baden-Powell knew that warfare was becoming less a game of the aristocracy and more of a meritocratic endeavor, however the pools from which society was drawing their officers were becoming less tied to the land. How many men would go without ever holding a rifle until they received a draft notice? How many would never learn the basics of tracking wild game? In creating the idea of scouting he sought to not only teach young men civic virtue but important martial doctrine like patrolling, tracking, and strategy. Beyond that, he sought to create men of chivalry and valor in what was becoming an increasingly debased society. The first edition of Scouting for Boys looks at the need for scouting and the need for a body of able young men from which Britannia could draw upon. It became popular in the States for a similar reason, as cities exploded and families looked to find a means for their young men to connect with the land, and overtook British scouting because it was inherently closer to the frontier and many great wild spaces. Scouting itself became a great fixture but especially for our military: I have heard from mixed sources that holding the rank of Eagle Scout essentially guaranteed a quick promotion after enlisting, and older editions of the Scouting handbook was essentially a guide on patrolling.

Scouting is dead now. It’s been dead for some time, but it seems that they’ve finished skinning and tanning its hide for some grotesque imitation to wear. Where else are our young men to go? Fraternity life has become hollow and essentially an MLM. It will still teach you, or any other similarly situated young men, about some important life lessons. I am sure there are some good chapters out there, but my experience was nationals focusing purely on increasing membership as much as possible without a regard for quality of character (although, I had a heck of a great time with the guys who I can call brother). I’d quote Bowling Alone but I think you get the idea.

The irony is that the Catholic Church and Scouting suffered similar issues in that they had to deal with sexual abuse scandals at similar times. Atomization and our steep decline can be blamed for membership declines in both organizations. Both took steep hits to membership and involvement. However, the Church in America has evolved and has begun to return to its more traditional roots. This has seen a huge boost in attendance and the decline of der boomer liberalism as a guiding doctrine for the Church. New priests are almost exclusively ultra-orthodox and socially conservative. I had the opportunity to attend SEEK in 2019 and I saw that the Catholic youth of the day were focused partially on retvrning, but also on the idea of this Church being in this world but not of it. There’s a recent article that discusses this on AP called A Step Back in Time. A good read when it comes to the values shift and re-alignment taking place.

Scouting, on the other hand, is going to learn that there are consequences for drifting too far from one’s core identity. The organization lost roughly half of its membership due to “Covid.” People, especially young men, crave authenticity and scouting seems to be trying to have its cake and eat it, too. The numbers since 2019 are also down despite broadening membership. I perused the list of merit badges and it seems that they’ve only added two nu-badges (sustainability and American Cultures), but they have watered down some of the other badges. Rifle shooting can be completed with a pellet gun now. The current chief scout executive is some beltway ghoul who, in an interview about this decision, seemed to cynically understand that this was being done purely to lower barriers to entry. But he also understands that membership is evaporating away into nothing.

BAP talks a lot in Bronze Age Mindset about how there just simply is not a space for young men to grow and develop their skills and capabilities. You can read this portion specifically in part two on the parable of the iron prison. Men need space in which they can develop their skills and build confidence. They need to be able to do this alongside men of a similar stripe. I was thinking about how fortunate I was to get this opportunity as a youth, as did my brother and cousins, but I am reminded of how tragic a loss this genuinely is. After “Scouting America” goes belly up, who will acquire Philmont? I had the opportunity to traverse it and I will legitimately become homicidal if I hear it’s been acquired by some goober. Florida Sea Base? All of the great camps and locales that can be found dotted throughout the United States. I am the man I am today because I had the opportunity to be brave and challenge myself but what will the men of tomorrow be like? Can we ever fill this niche?

People are becoming more insulated from life in general: you could go through all of high school and never experience any great personal victories or defeats and live an existence totally separate from any risks. I hope we can because I would want my posterity to ultimately have the same experience. I hope we do take the opportunity to fill the niche given a lot of young men seem to be aching for an opportunity to do something.

-By Teodorico

The post The End of Scoutvangelion: You are (not) Alone appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The idea of Cultural Marxism as a byzantine 12-step method for converting the West to economic Marxism is bogus. Marxism, at least in praxis, was an ethnic power-grab. It was primarily foisted upon the unwitting masses of Eastern and Western Europe by a supermajority-Jewish international cabal. For the purpose of this essay, I’m willing to give Marx and Engels the benefit of the doubt and say they genuinely believed in equitable distribution of wealth with no ethnic favoritism or self-exemption. I don’t have the time or energy to waste laying out that they weren’t, and I don’t need to in order to make my point.

The Marxists won. Not just in Europe, but virtually everywhere that had wealth. Jews waltzed into power and affluence. Now, Marxism was a problem. Take from the who and give to the whom? You mean Michael Bloomberg is going to have to sell one of his palatial estates to enrich the poor crackers of West Virginia? Las Vegas would become the property of all of the white card-dealers, cocktail waitresses, and bouncers? That simply wouldn’t do. Hence, Cultural Marxism. Within every poor West Virginian coal miner and White guy spinning the roulette wheel, there was a raging White corpo-fascist just begging to become wealthy and suppress the masses.

They actually pulled this stunt in Russia, classifying the peasants who didn’t like the idea of communism as kulaks and shipping them off to re-education camps (or worse), while confiscating their meagre land and placing it under control of the “proletariat” of middle-class urban party apparatchiks. Great minds think alike. Or, maybe they just went to the same synagogue in Krakow.

Paleoconservative conventional wisdom holds that Adorno, and the rest of the Frankfurt School decided the masses in the West were just too damn happy with their serfdom and needed to be culturally broken down until they revolted and established Marxism. They supposedly called this process “Cultural Marxism” and, to the paleocons, it’s synonymous with “Political Correctness.” I’ve got a simpler thesis. Marxism already won. They had to change the rules to protect their power. Wealthy =/= bad. White wealthy = bad. Impoverished =/= good. White impoverished = bad. White = bad.

Jews knew they needed some camouflage, so they enlisted women, ethnic minorities, degenerates, and even White men with a taste for bureaucratic or managerial power so it wouldn’t be so obvious and tossed them some scraps from the table. If you need any evidence that non-Jewish minorities are tertiary beneficiaries, look no further than the fact that whenever their interests come into conflict with Jewish interests, they’re sent under the bus rather than just to the back of it. Just consider the ousted President of Harvard and the rest of the fallout from the Palestinian protests.

As a result of this senior/junior partnership, we have a system where non-Whites, particularly Jews, are free to maintain power and wealth, as they are oppressed, and various Whites, having little power or wealth, are oppressors. We’ve squared the circle (kikel, perhaps). What better way to accomplish this than to hide it behind some boring pilpul dissertation about how they have to purge all cultural remnants of the fascist personality?

This is why, if you go to a Marxist protest and meet self-described Marxists, they don’t want to talk about the wealthy people using power unless the wealthy people in question are White. Worse, they’d prefer to talk about the fascist racists in the middle-class and the trailer parks who are always one bad week away from taking over, hoisting the ~~Swastika~~, ~~Stars and Bars~~, Stars and Stripes and shipping all of the wealthy and poor non-Whites into death camps. Whether it’s the unemployed coal miners or the irate blackjack dealers, they’re going to have to change up parts of the 1941 plan. Have you seen U.S. railway infrastructure lately? I don’t think it’s up to the task of line-hauling 49% of the country on one-way trips.

Paleocons would tell you all of this ethnic hatred and deculturalization is step 5, sub-step c, of the grandiose plan to demoralize the populace and introduce outright Marxism. Occam is scratching at the roof of his coffin. The simpler, correct, conclusion is that Cultural Marxism was just the Jews’ way of slamming the door to the command center closed behind them and avoiding getting hauled out and sent to the gulag themselves. If we know anything about history, it’s that Jews really don’t like manual labor.

The post The Simple Truth Behind Cultural Marxism appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In terms of a contestable conflict, it’s been over in the Ukraine since Putin decided to intervene directly back in 2022. NATO never had the military capability to defeat the Russians in a direct confrontation. Meanwhile, the Russians had overwhelming advantages over the Ukrainians in firepower, personnel, equipment, technology, military-industrial complexes, and strategic depth from which to conduct long range strikes anywhere in Ukraine.

NATO’s ability to supply Ukraine was always limited by what capacity was left to drain from stockpiles as the ability of production to keep pace with Ukrainian consumption was either woefully inadequate or nonexistent, as in the case of equipment such as Western tanks, which had been produced through boutique processes long before it began. The Ukrainians can be supplied indefinitely with small FPV drones, but that’s about it.

Ukraine is the size of Texas and fortified for World War 3 by the Soviets. It was where Moscow would be defended. It’s taken Russia over two years to annihilate one of the largest armies in the world, backed by NATO, along a line of contact that would stretch from DC to the middle of Florida. The question was only time.

Putin shows treaty on Ukraine’s neutrality, signed by Kiev but dumped under Western pressure

Read more: https://t.co/83lHuubcoE pic.twitter.com/SWkOmuYoN4

— RT (@RT_com) June 18, 2023

Accordingly, the Ukrainians agreed to a settlement with the Russians at the outset of the conflict, which could’ve spared all the lives lost since then but they were ordered to renege. Putin shows off his signed copy of the agreement. What’s telling is that the Ukrainians clearly aren’t allowed to negotiate even as what’s left of their military is being pounded with hundreds of metric tons of glide bombs every day.

So, from the Ukrainian side of things they’ll just keep going until the situation collapses rather than announcing to the world they want it to end and would be willing to make the necessary concessions to halt Russian combat operations. In other words, it’s up to Russia to induce a collapse which produces the most favorable outcomes for itself. We can observe some developments that might offer predictive value in this regard.

Russia adds Zelensky to criminal 'wanted' list, Ukraine calls it 'desperation'
https://t.co/KNvnG8ZWaD pic.twitter.com/FfP5okTAFz

— FRANCE 24 English (@France24_en) May 4, 2024

First, Ukraine didn’t hold scheduled presidential elections last month. A strong case can be made that Zelensky is no longer the legitimate president. Thus, he’s now on Russia’s criminal wanted list. This signals that he’s officially no longer a leader who can represent Ukraine along with anyone in his government. It’s also a way of letting Zelensky know he wouldn’t be allowed to head off into exile if he sticks around for the inevitable collapse. Best to flee at the first sign of trouble.

So, perhaps it has become a matter of how Putin knocks over the dominoes now that they’re set up. This could be why a large Russian operation is underway in the northeast of Ukraine threatening both Kharkov and Kiev. The Russians don’t need to storm and subdue either city, especially since this would involve destroying them. There was an imperative to conduct such an operation in Mariupol during Phase One in order to secure a land bridge between Crimea and the breakaway republics of Donetsk and Luhansk. Not this time around.

All that’s needed now is to induce a panic, so the defenders abandon their posts and flee westward rather than sticking around for the slaughter. That could be accomplished by moving forces outside the municipal limits and bringing it under artillery range, for example. Either city could serve as a catalyst for regime collapse.

Apparently, there are so many surrenders and desertions in the face of the current operation that units have been deployed to the rear to intercept troops trying to leave. The hopelessness is already rife, and it’s justifiable. It’s a very sad situation for the Ukrainians.

The abandonment of one by the military and government would prompt the same in the other since it would be the next objective on the list. Therefore, whether or not the Russians move on Kiev, the national government would probably flee the capital. How then does the fiction remain that Ukraine has a chance to hold off the Russians? Will the conscripts fight on as it sets up shop again in Lvov? Would the people even support this? Nations often hold up while losing a war until the moment they don’t, and then the disintegration happens overnight.

Note that the Russians have used this tactic earlier in the conflict. The Russian Army parked a column of around 40,000 outside of Kiev in order to put political pressure on the government and tie down the Ukrainian units assigned to the city’s defense in order to prevent them from attempting to relieve Mariupol. The operation was a success in this regard, and also brought the Ukrainians to the negotiating table to sign the agreement discussed earlier in the article.

After the agreement was ripped up and Phase One ended, the column dispersed. In the West, this is hailed as the defeat of a siege. For the Russians, the efficacy of this tactic was proven against the Ukrainians. The Russians know that the Ukrainians aren’t willing or able to hold Kiev indefinitely. This is why these visits by foreign leaders and various stooges are allowed. The major visits are personally approved by Putin, and not because he’s scared. It just adds to the humiliation when the Saigon moment arrives, just like it did in Kabul.

NEW – Blinken plays guitar in a bar in Kyiv while Russian troops advance in northeast Ukraine.pic.twitter.com/6rDm0Gd6zX

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) May 14, 2024

Pair evil with a lack of self-awareness, and this is what you get. What if President Ford had made a visit to Saigon praising the South Vietnamese and proclaiming that the city would never fall? Putin is allowing this to score a propaganda win against the West on the global stage and make a point about NATO’s impotence in imposing its will following the Global War on Terror and his resurrection of Russian power.

Like everything else that happens on the world stage, the average American will just forget about all the grandstanding and fraudulent predictions made in Kiev, and all of the Western experts will just move on as if it never happened. However, this isn’t who Putin needs to show that the Rules-Based International Order is a sick joke. He needs to rally the alternative system being instituted in partnership with China.

There’s a decent chance we watch the situation in Ukraine fall apart in the near future. It would be the best thing for Ukrainians:

Young Ukrainian woman from Nikolaev is calling for help, her husband has been kidnapped & forcefully conscripted by the Ukrainian-Khazarian regime.

He was the only provider for their young family.

‘They’ will now send him to die in a muddy trench for McDonalds & Israel. pic.twitter.com/psaCDQjmWA

— Orthodox Canonist (@OCanonist) May 14, 2024

The post Keep on Rockin’ in the Free World appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The thing about the Gaza Strip is that it’s what the name implies: a small strip of land between Israel and the Mediterranean. There are lots of people living in the vicinity and also a stone’s throw across the Mediterranean is Europe. Likewise with Lebanon where Hezbollah is resisting the Jews, one nuke is probably enough to wipe out most of the population.

There’s also Iran, which is the size of Western Europe. None of its neighbors would be happy about the fallout from nuking the place, however. The thing with nukes as well is that a tactical nuke is still a Hiroshima scenario. This has significant practical implications for many more people than merely the intended victims. No nuclear blast will only be killing the residents of Gaza, for example.

Lindsay Graham tells Israel to break out the nukes and “do whatever the hell you have to do” to survive.

He’s bought by AIPAC to be their warmongering mouthpiece. pic.twitter.com/pYNfnjdjFF

— War Intel (@warintel4u) May 12, 2024

Look, I do get it. You’ve probably had times were you drove past a rent-2-own rims store and maybe a plasma donation center on your way to Walmart while musing to yourself that it might be for the best if this all just disappears in a hot flash. However, as a serious man, you probably concluded that in the long term, a nuclear exchange wouldn’t be in our best interests. What about the children?

Meanwhile, in Congress, we ostensibly find ourselves represented by a bloodthirsty, irate homosexual advocating for precisely this course of action. He’s literally slobbering at the mouth haranguing an interviewer from a Jewish media outlet about why millions, perhaps more, need to perish for the sake of the Jews.

NEW – Lindsey Graham: "Hit Iran… blow it off the map." pic.twitter.com/5dfhVQOcja

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) December 28, 2023

I somewhat wonder if he’s compromised by blackmail material, but then again all of this fellow Republicans are basically the same. Still, he pushes it the furthest. Homosexuals take things too far, losing all sense of shame, dignity, or reason in the pursuit of their perversions. That might explain it, too. He applies this same fervor to the demonic entity worshiped by the Jews.

Graham flies into a rage on television and starts blurting out recipes for millions of deaths or much worse in scenarios that would invariably lead to global conflict. It’s actually quite bizarre that any country would have such a lunatic holding high political office. European politics is full of traitors with the worst character traits imaginable, but they don’t have Lindsey Grahams.

The American Republican politician is a reprehensible creature in a class of its own, but Graham leads the pack. There are certainly more pathetic Republicans, I might award that one to Mike Johnson and his black felon son who helps monitor that Johnson isn’t looking at pornography on his phone. What Graham brings to the table is a visceral thirst for blood paired with an overt homosexuality and slavishness to the Jews that really ought to catch some eyebrows.

It’s quite disturbing but remarkable at the same time that nobody around here seems to think this is inappropriate. Europeans comment that he’s a nutjob. They’re willing to admit that part, but Americans don’t seem to be noticing. At least the Russians had the good sense to finally designate him as a terrorist.

Russia designates US Senator Lindsey Graham as a terrorist

Days after Lindsey suggested that the United States classify Russia as a terrorist state, Senator Graham was added to Russia's list of "extremists and terrorists." pic.twitter.com/tHSrTpKR6Z

— MintPress News (@MintPressNews) February 20, 2024

He’s been calling for Putin’s assassination for a couple years now and celebrating how the U.S. gets good value for its money in the form of dead Russians while calling for direct NATO strikes on the Russian military. How much were the Russians supposed to take? Graham isn’t just saying things. He wants these things to happen. Clearly, he delights in the bloodshed.

Is there a Brutus in Russia? Is there a more successful Colonel Stauffenberg in the Russian military?

The only way this ends is for somebody in Russia to take this guy out.

You would be doing your country – and the world – a great service.

— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) March 4, 2022

For example, during the protest on January 6th he tried to play a fruitloop version of Napoleon with his artillery at the Battle of Austerlitz, exhorting the cops to gun down the protestors without mercy. Meanwhile, these protestors probably voted for him if they were from South Carolina. When Graham gets what he wants, the blood flows. I guess we should feel lucky that the big ticket items are still an issue.

There could have been dozens of Ashli Babbitts. On January 6 Lindsey Graham called for law enforcement to shoot the rioters. He yelled at them, “Take back the Senate! You’ve got guns, use them. We give you guns for a reason. Use them!”. They didn’t, except once. pic.twitter.com/4vkst8bwA4

— Mike Sington (@MikeSington) October 31, 2021

I’m not the only guy on the dissident side of things who went from this vague idea that you can spot many problematic people from their faces to a strong confirmation bias that this was possible. If Graham was sitting on his porch watching the kids play across the street, would you not start looking at him a bit suspicious? Take a look:

The destruction of the barbaric terrorist, religious Nazi organization known as Hamas is at hand.

This means:

Security for Israel.
Liberation for the Palestinian people.
Never Again. https://t.co/4Squ9Sl65O

— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) May 13, 2024

Graham is both a unique product of America but also the invariable end stage result of a Jewish system of power which Jews claim represents everyone but themselves, who are the victims. The very worst people ultimately assume the front-facing roles because the tasks required are so traitorous and distasteful that someone with a sense of loyalty and ethics wouldn’t want to do them. To do these things with enthusiasm takes a vicious sodomite like Graham, which probably explains a lot.

Moreover, as this system spirals and persists, anyone decent is filtered out long before they’d ever consider running for office. As a corollary, I think what’s also happening now is that the Jews can’t count on someone like Graham to present himself as a rational actor, so they’re increasingly stepping into the top spots although they’re no good at it. In other words, the goyim brought up to serve them through this system are so terrible they feel compelled to step from behind the scenes to try and tone things down. I could be wrong, but this is my suspicion.

I’m not sure if Josh Hawley or Tom Cotton are ever going to be able to overshadow Graham. The shadow cast by nuclear winter ought to do the trick, though.

The post Senator Duke Nukem appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Anyone who pays attention to conservative politics in the [u]nited States at present for half a minute will hear some variant of the phrase, ‘Israel is the greatest ally of the U.S. in the Middle East (or, in the world, according to some variations of this statement).’ The basis of the statement is that Christians and Jews have some sort of mystical religious bond – that they worship the same, or nearly the same, God – and this should translate into close political ties between the States and Israel.

But these statements are never examined for their veracity. We aim to do so now. Should Christians in the U.S., and especially in Dixie, consider Jews/the nation of Israel their best friend in the world? Church history, when one actually reads it, says No.

Let us look first at the lives of the saints. There is abundant evidence of Jewish malice toward Christians. From the early Christian era is the life of St Matrona:

The Holy Martyr Matrona of Thessalonica suffered in the third or fourth century. She was a slave of the Jewish woman Pautila (or Pantilla), wife of one of the military commanders of Thessalonica. Pautila constantly mocked her slave for her faith in Christ, and tried to convert her to Judaism. Saint Matrona, who believed in Christ from her youth, still prayed to the Savior Christ, and secretly went to church unbeknownst to her vengeful mistress.

Pautila, learning that Saint Matrona had been to church, asked, “Why won’t you come to our synagogue, instead of attending the Christian church?” Saint Matrona boldly answered, “Because God is present in the Christian church, but He has departed from the Jewish synagogue.” Pautila went into a rage and mercilessly beat Saint Matrona, tied her up, and shut her in a dark closet. In the morning, Pautila discovered that Saint Matrona had been freed of her bonds by an unknown Power.

In a rage Pautila beat the martyr almost to death, then bound her even more tightly and locked her in the closet. The door was sealed so that no one could help the sufferer. The holy martyr remained there for four days without food or water, and when Pautila opened the door, she again found Saint Matrona free of her bonds, and standing at prayer.

Pautila flogged the holy martyr and left the skin hanging in strips from her body. The fierce woman locked her in the closet again, where Saint Matrona gave up her spirit to God.

Pautila had the holy martyr’s body thrown from the roof of her house. Christians took up the much-suffered body of the holy martyr and buried it. Later, Bishop Alexander of Thessalonica built a church dedicated to the holy martyr. Her holy relics, glorified by many miracles, were placed in this church.

The judgment of God soon overtook the evil Pautila. Standing on the roof at that very place where the body of Saint Matrona had been thrown, she stumbled and fell to the pavement. Her body was smashed, and so she received her just reward for her sin.

Several centuries later, we find similar things happening in the life of St Eustratius:

Martyr Eustratius of the Caves was born in the eleventh century at Kiev into a wealthy family. As an adult, he received monastic tonsure at the Kiev Caves monastery, after giving away all his possesions to the poor. Saint Eustratius humbly underwent obediences at the monastery, strictly fulfilling the rule of prayer and passing his days in fasting and vigilance.

In 1096 the Polovetsians captured Kiev and ravaged the monastery of the Caves, doing away with many of the monks. Saint Eustratius was taken into captivity, and was sold into slavery with thirty monastic laborers and twenty inhabitants of Kiev to a certain Jew living in Korsun.

The impious Jew tried to make the captives deny Christ, threatening to kill those who refused by starving them. Saint Eustratius encouraged and exhorted his brother Christians, “Brothers! Let none of us who are baptized and believe in Christ betray the vows made at Baptism. Christ has regenerated us through water and the Spirit. He has freed us from the curse of the Law by His Blood, and He has made us heirs of His Kingdom. If we live, we shall live for the Lord. If we die, we shall die in the Lord and inherit eternal life.”

Inspired by the saint’s words, the captives resolved to die of starvation, rather than renounce Christ, Who is the food and drink of Eternal Life. Exhausted by hunger and thirst, some captives perished after three days, some after four days, and some after seven days. Saint Eustratius remained alive for fourteen days, since he was accustomed to fasting from his youth. Suffering from hunger, he still did not touch food nor water. The impious Jew, seeing that he had lost the money he had paid for the captives, decided to take revenge on the holy monk.

The radiant Feast of the Resurrection of Christ drew near, and the Jewish slave owner was celebrating the Jewish Passover with his companions. He decided to crucify Saint Eustratius. The cruel tormentors mocked the saint, offering to let him share their Passover meal. The Martyr replied, “The Lord has now bestown a great grace upon me. He has permitted me to suffer on a cross for His Name just as He suffered.” The saint also predicted a horrible death for the Jew.

Hearing this, the enraged Jew grabbed a spear and stabbed Saint Eustratius on the cross. The martyr’s body was taken down from the cross and thrown into the sea. Christian believers long searched for the holy relics of the martyr, but were not able to find them. But through the Providence of God the incorrupt relics were found in a cave and worked many miracles. Later, they were transferred to the Near Caves of the Kiev Caves monastery.

The prediction of the holy Martyr Eustratius that his blood would be avenged was fulfilled soon after his death. The Byzantine Emperor issued a decree expelling all Jews from Korsun, depriving them of their property, and putting their elders to death for torturing Christians. The Jew who crucified Saint Eustratius was hanged on a tree, receiving just punishment for his wickedness.

There are also Christian children who suffered tortures and death from the Jews. Here are a few examples:

THIS martyr was another victim of the implacable rage of the Jews against our holy religion. He suffered in the twelfth year of his age. Having been not long bound an apprentice to a tanner in Norwich, a little before Easter, in 1137, the Jews of that city having enticed him into their houses, seized and gagged him: then they bound, mocked and crucified him, in derision of Christ: they also pierced his left side. On Easter-day they put the body into a sack, and carried it into Thorp-wood, now a heath, near the gates of the city, there to bury it; but being discovered, left it hanging on a tree. . . . Mr. Weever writes that, “the Jews in the principal cities of the kingdom, used sometimes to steal away, circumcise, crown with thorns, whip, torture, and crucify some neighbour’s male-child, in mockery and scorn of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. St. Richard of Pontoise, in France, was martyred by them in that manner. As also St. Hugh, (according to Matthew Paris and John Capgrave,) a child crucified at Lincoln, in 1255.

And one other:

IN the year 1472, when the Jews of Trent (famous for the last general council held there) met in their synagogue on Tuesday, in Holy Week, to deliberate on the preparations for the approaching festival of the Passover, which fell that year on the Thursday following, they came to a resolution of sacrificing to their inveterate hatred of the Christian name, some Christian infant on the Friday following, or Good Friday. A Jewish physician undertook to procure such an infant for the horrid purpose. And while the Christians were at the office of Tenebræ on Wednesday evening, he found a child called Simon, about two years old, whom by caresses and by showing him a piece of money, he decoyed from the door of a house, the master and mistress whereof were gone to church, and carried him off. On Thursday evening the principal Jews shut themselves up in a chamber adjoining to their synagogue, and at midnight began their cruel butchery of this innocent victim. Having stopped his mouth with an apron to prevent his crying out, they made several incisions in his body gathering his blood in a basin. Some, all this while, held his arms stretched out in the form of a cross: others held his legs. The child being half dead, they raised him on his feet, and while two of them held him by the arms, the rest pierced his body on all sides with their awls and bodkins. When they saw the child had expired, they sung round it: “In the same manner did we treat Jesus the God of the Christians: thus may our enemies be confounded for ever.” The magistrates and parents making strict search after the lost child, the Jews hid it first in a barn of hay, then in a cellar, and at last threw it into the river. But God confounded all their endeavours to prevent the discovery of the fact, which being fully proved upon them, with its several circumstances, they were put to death: the principal actors in the tragedy being broken upon the wheel and burnt. The synagogue was destroyed, and a chapel was erected on the spot where the child was martyred.

After reading these accounts, it should surprise no one to hear the Fathers of the Church warning Christians about friendship with Jews. St John Chrysostom (+407), one of the greatest of the Holy Fathers, who rose to become Patriarch of Constantinople, had this to say in one of his sermons:

Many, I know, respect the Jews and think that their present way of life is a venerable one. This is why I hasten to uproot and tear out this deadly opinion. I said that the synagogue is no better than a theater and I bring forward a prophet as my witness. Surely the Jews are not more deserving of belief than their prophets. “You had a harlot’s brow; you became shameless before all”. Where a harlot has set herself up, that place is a brothel. But the synagogue is not only a brothel and a theater; it also is a den of robbers and a lodging for wild beasts. Jeremiah said: “Your house has become for me the den of a hyena”. He does not simply say “of wild beast”, but “of a filthy wild beast”, and again: “I have abandoned my house, I have cast off my inheritance”. But when God forsakes a people, what hope of salvation is left? When God forsakes a place, that place becomes the dwelling of demons.

(2) But at any rate the Jews say that they, too, adore God. God forbid that I say that. No Jew adores God! Who say so? The Son of God say so. For he said: “If you were to know my Father, you would also know me. But you neither know me nor do you know my Father”. Could I produce a witness more trustworthy than the Son of God?

(3) If, then, the Jews fail to know the Father, if they crucified the Son, if they thrust off the help of the Spirit, who should not make bold to declare plainly that the synagogue is a dwelling of demons? God is not worshipped there. Heaven forbid! From now on it remains a place of idolatry. But still some people pay it honor as a holy place.

. . . Our common Mother (the Church) has lost not a cloak but a brother. The devil stole him and now holds him in Judaism. You know who stole him; you know him who was stolen. Do you see me lighting, as it were, the lamp of my instruction and searching everywhere in my grief? And do you stand silent, refusing to denounce him? What excuse will you have? Will the Church not reckon you among her worst enemies? Will she not consider you a foe and destroyer?

A tremendous holy man of our own time, St Paisios of Mt Athos (+1994) also warns:

Difficult times are ahead. Great trials await us. Christians will suffer great persecutions. Meanwhile, it’s obvious that people don’t understand that we’re on the verge of the end times, that the seal of the Antichrist is becoming a reality. As if nothing’s happening. That’s why Holy Scripture says that even the chosen will be deceived.

The Zionists want to rule the earth. To achieve their ends they use black magic and satanism. They regard satan-worship as a means to gain the strength they need to carry out their plans. They want to rule the earth using satanic power. God is not something they take into account…

The trendline is pretty easy to discern. But a digression is necessary before closing. None of this is meant to gin up violence against Jews. There are of course some who do very good things in the world. Robert Amsterdam, for instance, is doing praiseworthy work defending the Orthodox Church from the persecutions of the Zelensky regime in the Ukraine. And many Jews have become notable Christians over the years: the Holy Apostles chief among them, but also saints like St Kyriakos, Patriarch of Jerusalem (martyred in 363 AD, who was a Jew named Jude before his baptism).

Nevertheless, it is a great mistake for Christians in Dixie or anywhere else to say of the Jews or the nation of Israel that they are our best friends in the world. That is an appellation which must be reserved for our brothers and sisters in Christ, who are in fact the True Israel: ‘Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham’ (St Paul’s Letter to the Galatians 3:7). Our foreign policy ought, therefore, to focus on strengthening ties with Christian countries around the world rather than obliterating and ostracizing peoples who refuse to dance to the Israeli/Zionist tune.

But because of the spirit of delusion that has befallen the world (II Thessalonians 2:11), it is difficult for people to accept words like these. Christians must prepare themselves to face hardships, as St Paisios cautioned above. But he also assures them that as they undergo trials, the joy of the Lord will be with them:

Let us not expect the spiritual spring if we don’t first pass through the spiritual winter during which the spiritual vermin die. We mustn’t expect the divine to blossom within us if the human hasn’t first died.

Those who suffer deeply for the salvation of the whole world and help in their own way (as strugglers) and humbly entrust themselves to the hands of God, feel the greatest joy in the world. Their life is a constant doxology, for they flutter about internally like angels, glorifying God day and night.

With those words in mind, Christians should go forth into the world to tell the Truth to any who have ears to hear.

-By Walt Garlington

The post Is Israel the Best Friend of Christians in the United States? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In my last article, “The Last Will and Testament of a Free Dixian,”a charge was given to those that will inherit what must one day be free and independent South, governed in a confederation of ethnically connected Christian nations. The charge was wide in scope, expansive in its generality, an emotional and spiritual blessing for your posterity. But our souls tell us, it most assuredly takes more than flowery words to procure. To snatch freedom out of the hand of the evil one and his children, it will take determination, fortitude, and sacrifice. To fulfill the charge in this testament, it takes will power.

I remember listening to an autobiographical story from a man, who, as a young boy, had a fear of thunderstorms. It petrified him to paralyzation. Subsequently, he made plans to face that fear when the next storm stuck, and determined to climb up into a tree and stay the night through that hellacious storm. It was his theory, if he could will himself into facing the anxiety that naturally occurs during these potentially life threatening storms, his fear would be crushed in his mind forever. He willed himself to face his fear, formulated a plan, and determined that he could not live with himself if he did not conquer the enemy that crippled him. He succeeded, and never had that fear again.

So, what does conquering your fears look like young Dixian? What will you face for an independent South? What is the road less traveled you must take, even though it may stretch you to exhaustion?

Knowing that our homeland must be separate from the United States, and our state governments must lead the way! Young men, strive to put yourself into the position to lead. You will be amazed at how little it takes to win a public office. It took just less than ten percent of the vote in my area to become a judge, and less to be on city council. Become a sheriff, police officer, firefighter, all of which have great value for our people as we establish governments inside, but also outside the current system. Use your youth and energy towards that end.

Our churches must be places that attract quality men. Men that are willing to assault the gates of hell for the kingdom. As a benefit for you single men, that type of masculinity attracts quality women that will feel comfortable starting large families with you. Large Southern families change the calculus of the current demographic replacement exponentially! So, be faithful, become a deacon or elder in your church, and direct your congregations from a telescopic outward facing mission toward an inward focused philanthropy. It’s time our congregations take care of their own, as the Bible commands, and that before the foreigner. I know from experience, shifting this paradigm takes boldness, patience, courage, and the determination to go it alone. I have seen dramatic positive changes in the leadership of my congregation since I rejected timidity.

Don’t be afraid to start a business, working for yourself makes you resilient, especially as a tradesman. You’ll be more insulated from outside forces. Don’t be afraid to buy land and start a homestead and become as self sufficient as possible. I’ve overcome this particular fear and am on this path presently. Do as much for yourself as possible, and build skill sets that you never even thought you could acquire. Every bit of separation our people can get from the tentacles of the imperial economic leviathan ensures the better chance we have to survive the coming collapse.

In the next few articles I’ll address specific policies that will inspire our people to break from the conservative/liberal paradigm, a paradigm which paralyzes our ability see real political change towards our freedom.

So, young Dixian, you must overcome the fear of advocating for your people exclusively, and in every decision you make. You are not required to save the world, no matter who enlists you to do so. You are here to save your Southern people, and by all the means that the Lord of Hosts allows and commands. You have not the luxury of delay, and any patience that you display must be deliberate and pragmatic.

You can complain about your elders failing to maintain our civilization, or you can get involved and restore it to their shame.

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post The Will appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The popularity of Andrew Tate among so many young men, although tragic, is unsurprising. It is the result of a decades-long war on masculinity – one that boys, because they are younger and not fully formed, were always the primary victims of. Andrew Tate is many things, he is an abuser, a pimp, a degenerate, and a recent convert to Islam (for however long that will be). He cares nothing about others. Self-sacrifice, one of the key trademarks of healthy masculinity, is a completely foreign concept to him. He’s a man who views existence as moving from one fleshy pleasure to another. He is the posterchild of a hedonistic post-Christian West. No one on the Right should defend him.

But the fact that he has such a large following lays at the feet of a Left that hates all traditional notions of masculinity and has engaged in a never-ending campaign to destroy it. Tate’s young fans know nothing of a society that embraces healthy notions of masculinity. All they have ever known is a society that sees it as a negative force; hence, men constantly find themselves on the short end of the stick. DEI puts them well behind the eight ball in the job market, while the rise of dating apps has rendered the vast majority of young men as outcasts. Any complaint about their conditions, no matter how nuanced, will get them labeled as a “loser” or an “incel.” Even baseless allegations can ruin their life. To a significant amount of people, a false abuse allegation made by a woman against a man is a categorical impossibility, and, as a result, even an allegation can make them a social pariah. It’s no wonder then that Andrew Tate has managed to win such a following. He offers boys a chance out of a system that hates them. He offers them an opportunity to destroy the society that made them into villains.

Television, especially sitcoms, just reinforces the notion that men are stupid and disposable. If you are too young to remember when The Simpsons debuted, you are too young to remember a world where sitcom fathers were largely portrayed as intelligent, hardworking, and vital members of the family. Instead, the dad became the dufus and a big, overgrown kid. Are there exceptions? Sure, King of the Hill comes to mind, but those are the exceptions. Now, several generations of men only live in a society that hates them. No wonder so many of them no longer care if that society survives.

Important to note just how many boys were raised by a weak father. Mom was in charge, and everyone knew it. Dad was there to watch football. And those are the cases where the dad was even around at all, in many cases he could not even manage that. To be sure, there were/are always cases where the father is not around. Sometimes it was due to death, sometimes alcohol, and sometimes abandonment. But even in those cases, the society was overall healthy enough to survive because other local men could step in and provide leadership to young boys. Today, those are gone, far too many men are too busy to provide such leadership and one of the key institutions that did provide that leadership, the Church, has been heavily feminized.

Meanwhile, the traditional Western heroes that could provide boys someone to admire have been destroyed for being racist. When young boys can no longer look up to the likes of Charlemagne, George Washington, or Robert E Lee, they have to find someone. Someone must fill that void and, if it’s someone like Tate, well then that is better than nothing at all. The lack of real-life historical figures for boys to admire is one of the most important shifts in the culture that has occurred in the past 70 years and is also one of the most ignored.

I do not have an inherent issue with the use of a fantasy setting for entertainment aimed at boys. I’m a Catholic, obviously, I admire Tolkien. Fantasy settings have always been used, and can be used to impart important moral lessons, including traditional understandings of manhood. The issue is the complete lack of balance. There is a reason that toy soldiers would traditionally feature soldiers from actual wars, it was seen as giving something boys could actually aspire to. However, in the backlash against the Vietnam War, those traditional toy soldiers were banished and, in their place, came new heroes that could never exist. Those certainly had their own value and were cool looking, and they were certainly better than what we have now, but something important was lost in that shift, and now we are seeing the end results.

If the Left was serious about combatting the influence of someone like Tate, they would rein in the misandry. They would stop telling young girls that men are disposable, that playing with their feelings is hilarious, and that men are just playing life on easy mode. They would allow boys to have traditional masculine heroes again. They would realize that whatever merit Homer Simpson clones had 35 years ago as a backlash against the Father Knows Best/Leave it to Beaver archetype is now meaningless to, at least, two generations of men who know nothing but the stupid sitcom dad. But they have no interest in that, to them, what is happening to boys is great because of sexism.

Remember, the Left wants revenge, not justice. That is why is it so important for healthy men to provide that leadership. We are going through tough times now, and traditional, healthy masculinity is badly needed. We must provide that leadership. We might not be able to make many of today’s “men” turn off the NFL and become a better father, as much as I would like to do so, but we can provide leadership to young men that desperately need it. They will find that leadership, the question is whether it will come from well-adjusted men or from the likes of Andrew Tate.

The post Andrew Tate’s Lost Boys appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Author's Preface: This is a resubmission of an essay published on Identity Dixie in early 2022. While it is mostly intact, an additional reference has been added to the bibliography and much more has been expanded upon in the Christian section as well as a few edits to the history section. I would also like to clarify that the uses of "Japhetic race," "Japhethites," "Dixians," and "Southerners" are synonymous with "Caucasian" and "White."

“And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation.”

Acts 17:26, KJV

The foremost artificial sin Dixie remains guilty of committing stands as the Jim Crow era. While Antebellum slavery receives unremitting condemnation, Southern segregation holds the crown jewel of Dixian sins, often painted as the nadir of race relations in North America. Very little apologetics were written in defense of Jim Crow, unlike the Antebellum South and the Confederate cause, and even the most ardent of pro-Southern and neo-Confederate sympathizers often refuse to address the era, going so far as to even adopt the current neo-abolitionist historiography. Aside from American historians, and the media, waxing poetically about the struggles of the Civil Rights movement and its leaders’ fight against systemic racism in Dixie during the 1950s and 1960s, many Southerners simply lack the intestinal fortitude to address the fallacies within the leftist narrative or to seek vindication of the Southern segregationists of old, despite those segregationists often comprising the brunt of the utmost superlative statesmen Dixie produced following the War Between the States. However, upon further research, it is quite possible, though difficult in many respects, to find a number of buried sources in which segregation is defended and justified. This essay will seek to provide a legal, social, and Christian justification for and explanation of how Jim Crow laws produced a superior society for both Caucasian and Negro Southerners, as well as, discussing the means through which they may be used to reform contemporary Southern society.

To give pretext to this extensive topic, a bit of history is required. The origin of Jim Crow Laws are murkier and less clear than commonly purported. Whereas a handful of instances which occurred allow for the pinpointing of the Jim Crow era’s official, or de jure, beginning, confusion mires the questions of “why” and “how” it began, a far more convoluted origin than the simplistic neo-abolitionist view of history.

Segregation began de facto in some areas during Reconstruction. On a case-by-case basis, Radicals sought to forcibly integrate numerous areas, and Lowland Southerners’ intimate, paternalistic pre-War lifestyles allowed for a greater degree of social interaction between the races. However, that paternalism did not prevent Southerners from holding the same social beliefs as they had prior to 1865; additionally, poor Whites assiduously disliked interactions with Negroes. All classes of Whites loathed living under Radical and Negro rule, with the former oppressing Southerners and engaging in superfluous corruption and the latter committing wonton crime, as well as, flocking to abrasive militia organizations.20,21

With the Compromise of 1877 came the end of Reconstruction and the ousting of the Republican regime. The Redeemer Democrats often ran on pro-White platforms and promises of restoring social order. While these promises won them control of Dixie at this time, only a few, including Governors Wade Hampton III of South Carolina and Francis Nicholls of Louisiana, actually upheld their promises and led generally unobjectionable gubernatorial tenures, concentrated primarily in the first few years after Reconstruction’s end.20 Order was quickly restored, but the Democrats were no longer constituted of the same preeminent folk which constituted the Jacksonian, and few remaining Jeffersonian, Democrats of antebellum yore. The Southern aristocracy had been rendered all but extinct by the War Between the States’ end due to exile, destruction of their plantations and property, death from starvation and illness, without children because of their sons’ service in the Confederate military or their daughters falling victim to collateral damage, and the ravages of military invasion and occupation. The replacements to these men were often second sons, businessmen, lawyers, middle managers, and other second-rate individuals, failing to bear the torch of leadership their predecessors had done. This dominant faction of the Southern Democrats came to be known as the “conservatives” and “Bourbons.”4,21

This new generation of Southern politicians were more business oriented than the Planters, focusing on industry, railroads, urban expansion, and financial gains to the detriment of the still mostly rural Southern population. Taking this into account, it was quite beneficial for them politically to make claims of supporting Negroes, who began moving to urban areas following their emancipation. All but excommunicating working-class Whites from the base of the Democratic Party, conservatives cast aside the demographic they utilized to Redeem Dixie and began to cater to Freedmen. This created an interesting social dichotomy with three primary philosophies which competed against each other in the 1880s and 1890s.20,21

Jim Crow was originally a character in a minstrel play in the 1800sDe facto segregation ebbed and flowed following Reconstruction. Multiple philosophies formed to address the race issue. Conservatives were moderates and often promoted social policies of paternalism, often via ostentatious means and consisted of a few of the remaining Planters as well as new upper classes of Whites. There was a faction of liberal Whites who believed in the absolute idea of Negro suffrage and equity among the races and spread across all socio-economic classes. Lastly were the hardline racialists, or segregationists, and were typically constituted of the aforementioned rural, working-class Whites.20

The belligerent feelings between these factions catalyzed during the 1880s, as the original Redeemer governors began leaving office. At approximately the same point, the indigent rural population grew weary of the corruption brewing within the conservative Democratic ruling faction, and they opted to form various populist Farmer’s Alliances, ultimately creating the Populist Party. Drawing in poor Whites and Negroes, the Populists worked diligently to unify the two races and quell animosity between the two demographics which historically loathed each other and directly competed with each other in correlation with a series of devastating depressions which hit throughout the 1880s and 1890s. However, this was all for naught. The Populist Party in the South collapsed earlier than its counterparts in the West due to infighting and the conservatives’ strategic use of Negro votes to crush upstarting White populists.20

Yet, the conservatives failed to firmly grasp the reins of power indefinitely. These depressions, rising corruption, circumvention of White votes, and neglect of rural interests would be their undoing and weaken them severely, especially as the Negroes became more apathetic towards voting. Segregationist populists and left-wing populists continued to strengthen, encroach upon the conservatives’ power, and successfully takeover swathes of the Southern Democratic Party; consequently, conservatives were left standing at a fork in the road. 19,20

Whether capitulating so as to preserve what power they still held or being voted out of office entirely, the conservatives gave in, state-by-state, to the tidal wave of de jure Jim Crowism spreading across Dixie. In 1890, Governor John Marshall Stone, a former Confederate officer serving his second non-consecutive term whose first term was that of Mississippi’s Redeemer governor, presided over the ratification of the new Mississippi Jim Crow constitution. Beginning the movement known as the 2nd Mississippi Plan, segregationist constitutions and laws as a means of voting restriction began slowly manifesting in the South until 1896. These constitutions introduced poll taxes, literacy tests, and residential requirements. Ultimately, these prerequisites negatively effected many of the poor rural Caucasians and populists. They would finally seize the reins of power at the polls and begin an era of populist success upon the South’s adoption of White primaries between 1896 and 1906.19,20,21

Also in 1890, Benjamin Tillman seized the reins of power in South Carolina and became the Palmetto State’s governor. The former Confederate soldier was a firebrand mouthpiece of White agrarian populism, and Tillman spearheaded a vicious campaign against the South Carolina conservatives, loathing them for casting him aside after he led the Red Shirts to win Wade Hampton’s III governorship in the 1876 gubernatorial election. Tillman and his successor John Gary Evans pushed for and successfully presided over a new Jim Crow South Carolina constitution in 1895. The uproar caused by its ratification brought a case to the Supreme Court, the infamous Plessy v. Ferguson, in 1896 after which a slew of Jim Crow constitutions were drafted and ratified from then until 1910. The era of de jure Jim Crowism had truly begun, with the additional factor that White populism became a mainstay of Southern politics. According to Mississippi Governor James Vardaman, in 1890 a member of the Mississippi Constitutional Convention, “There is no use to equivocate or lie about the matter…. Mississippi’s constitutional convention of 1890 was held for no other purpose than to eliminate the nigger from politics. Not the ‘ignorant and vicious’, as some of the apologists would have you believe, but the nigger…. Let the world know it just as it is…. In Mississippi we have in our constitution legislated against the racial peculiarities of the Negro…. When that device fails, we will resort to something else.” This statement, along with his catering to the White working class in Mississippi throughout his political career in the Mississippi House of Representative, governorship, and U.S. Senate, and the later governorships of Theodore Bilbo in Mississippi and Tillman and Evans in South Carolina, only serve to solidify the patent fact that segregation formed as a product of the woes of the White working class and not a means of rich White Southerners to suppress Negro votes, as is often commonly claimed.20,21

South Carolina Governor and US Senator Benjamin TillmanPublic segregation developed separately but concurrently. While a bit muddier to pinpoint due to the intimate nature between the paternalistic upper class Caucasians and the lowly Negroes, legal public segregation began in 1890 with the Louisiana Separate Car Act. This very piece of state legislation is what resulted in the infamous Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court case which solidified de jure public segregation as a mainstay of Southern social life.21

Having established the caliginous background of the laws, the Jim Crow era violated nothing within the constitutional framework and easily held the status of legal justification. Multitudinous works, book and essay, presented and expounded upon this argument throughout the 20th century, only being suppressed and swept away by modern historians. Simply stated, the Jim Crow laws complied with America’s constitutional framework. Jim Crow required a poll tax and literacy in order to vote, effectively disqualifying a majority of Negroes and many poor Whites. However, this did not restrict voting based on racial status, adhering to the regulations established in the 15th Amendment; Congress simply passed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 anyway. Social segregation was further dismantled via malicious misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment in the Brown v Board of Education decision, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968, none of which actually held any constitutional validity upon inspection of the amendments in question. The last of the landmark Civil Rights bills came about in 1968, with the Fair Housing Act, preventing Whites from setting up their own communities and towns in direct violation of the 1st Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of association.2,15,18

The segregationists vehemently asserted the claim that communist factions, or sympathizers, fomented, catalyzed, and financed integration. In this they were not wrong, often utilizing the argument as a primary means of context and giving further validity to the arguments utilized in this essay.1,11,14,17,18 According to Herman Talmadge, the NAACP, Southern Regional Council, Southern Negro Youth Conference, and other such organizations teemed with communists. In his book, You and Segregation, Talmadge listed Dr. George S. Mitchell, Paul Robeson, James E. Jackson Jr., Howard Fast, Dr. Max Yergen, and Louis Burnham as a few notable examples. Dr. Mitchell was affiliated with the Southern Conference for Human Welfare, a notorious communist front group prosecuted by the House unAmerican Activities Committee, and which worked extensively with the NAACP prior to the former’s disbandment in 1948. Also, Louis Burnham was at one point the organizational secretary of SNYC while also the vice president of American Youth for Democracy, also known as the Young Communist League.18 Furthermore, the Left has even admitted to and praised communists’ involvement in the Civil Rights movement, in some cases even giving them credit for starting it.5,12,13

A John Birch Society billboard brandishing an image of Martin Luther King at a communist training schoolBeing fully within the legal bounds of the United States Constitution, the social benefits of the era are easily quantifiable. The social implications, and subsequent consequences, of integration were dire and overturned a multi-generational establishment of customs. The fallout from these tyrannical, communist, anti-Christian, anti-Southern pieces of legislation carried with it the permanent degradation and destruction of American, and especially Southern, society in both the short term and long term. The Civil Rights legislation of 1964,1965, and 1968 as well as the Brown v. Board ruling and Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society welfare program utterly decimated Negro communities. Now in direct competition with all Whites, Negroes found themselves and their businesses collapsing when confronted with the new White markets, and welfare expansion crushed any incentive they once held for work ethic and familial stability. Furthermore, the Fair Housing Act of 1968 caused the mass phenomenon known as “White Flight” to drain cities and townships of financial stability in order to recreate all White communities they no longer could legally have. Southern cities quickly collapsed thereafter and became consumed with crime.6,8,9,10 Lastly, the Immigration Act of 1965 created the scenario of Negroes having to directly compete with the unremitting flow of Hispanic immigrants into America, forcing the former into a position of competition on all fronts in the trades and agricultural fields they once thrived in. Even Herman Talmadge lamented the collapse in employment of Negro school teachers following the Brown v. Board ruling.18

The effect these political moves imposed on White Southerners carried an even greater reprehensible nature. No longer legally allowed to maintain their own clubs, schools, communities, or even politics, Southern Whites’ relationship with the Negroes soured immensely. Since the politics Whites controlled became tainted with the votes of lesser qualified, malicious groups brainwashed with communistic delusions of grandeur, Southern politicians turned on their own kinfolk after a generation, engaging in a modern Reconstruction which has not ceased since the 1990s. With no positive political representation, difficulty in residing within Southern cities, and a relentless assault on Southern culture and history within the education system and media, as well as, increasing rates of miscegenation, Southerners’ future appears quite bleak.

As a brief note, industrialization of Dixie arose concurrently and correlated with integrationist movements of the 1950s and 1960s. Urban life never truly benefitted the Negroes. As with integration of the labor force, urbanity placed Negroes in direct competition with Whites, and the latter generally responded with hostility. Blacks usually thrived more comfortably in rural areas, in agricultural work, and in trade skills. Urban industrial work brought with it associations with communist groups, modernized promises of “40 acres and a mule,” and the false hope of Civil Rights activism, none of which brought positive change to the Negro life. Robert Penn Warren discussed the negatives of industrial living for blacks, emphasizing the positives of rural living and their thriving within agricultural and trade work.3 This phenomenon remains an overlooked aspect of Negro history and neglected discussion of the negative consequences of their movement from rural to urban environments.

A cursory assessment of Jim Crow illuminates the fact numerous, if not most, segregationists utilized the Holy Bible to support their claims, a prime example being Mississippi Governor Ross Barnett’s status as a Baptist Sunday School teacher and who brazenly said, “The Good Lord was the original segregationist. He put the black man in Africa. He made us White because He wanted us White, and He intended that we should stay that way.”1,7,16 Pastors, mostly Baptist, Methodist, and Presbyterian, frequently railed against integration. One of the more famous sermons delivered on racial integration was titled “God: The Original Segregationist” and was written and preached by Reverend Carey Danial of West Dallas, Texas in 1954. Bob Jones Sr., the founder of Bob Jones University in South Carolina, was a recalcitrant segregationist and famously delivered a radio broadcast sermon in 1960 titled “Is Segregation Scriptural?” in opposition to integration. Further inquiry proves their beliefs true. Utilizing multiple verses and passages, Jim Crowism patently fails to fit within the modern accusations of Southern sins. The Old Testament remains filled to the brim with verses and laws discussing the separation of the Hebrews from other peoples, the New Testament discusses in Acts 17:26 how the Lord separated human groups into different homelands, and Revelation 7:9 describes John’s vision of countless unique nations and languages standing before God’s throne. Revelation also details the antichrist’s goal to establish a one world government with a one world language, flying in the face of modern, open border, miscegenation pursuing globalism. Leviticus 19:19 uses cattle, seeds, and cloth metaphorical as a means of condemning race-mixing. Genesis 10:5, in a similar fashion to that of Acts 17:26, says, “By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.” Ezra 9:1-7 displays an extreme grievance at the behest of the author towards intermarriage, and Zechariah 9:6 as well as Deuteronomy 28 both describe mixing as a curse. The Samaritans were a cursed people and were often viewed as such. They were the product of God’s punishment of the ancient Hebrews who were taken into bondage and slavery due to disobedience. Despite Christ’s parable of the Good Samaritan, at no point in the story does he refute this fact; they were the direct product of God’s judgement and wrath. Furthermore, is it wise to breed with cursed people’s, such as the modern Japhethites choosing to breed with the modern Hamites? Remember, 1 John 2:15-17 says, “15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. 17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.” Also, John 15:19 reads, “If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.” Mixing is a modern, worldly trend, and it is mentally bereft to accept that God approves of the systematic extermination of the Japhetic race at the behest of evil Western leadership.

However, the most damning piece of evidence opposed to integration and amalgamation of the races exists in Genesis 11, in the very first book of the Holy Bible. This passage gravely chronicles the story of the Tower of Babel. In this bit of Biblical history, God deliberately separated the humans living within that ancient metropolitan city so as to prevent them from creating a singular language, culture, and nation, disobeying His command to spread throughout Earth and multiply within their own lands. At no point in Christ’s ministry or in the Great Commission does the Bible purport the idea of endless mixing and destruction of cultures but to spread the Gospel to all peoples, two very different ideas. While most verses quoted on this topic are usually pulled from the Old Testament, James 1:17, Hebrews 13:8, Numbers 23:19, Malachi 3:6, and other passages make it abundantly clear God does not change. Jesus Christ stated in Matthew 5:17, “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.” He did not nullify the Old Testament but instead fulfilled and vindicated its very reason for existence. It is indescribably foolish to ascribe and create sins that do not exist within the Bible. It is also quite asinine to believe a supermajority of Christians who lived prior to the Civil Rights Movement of the mid 20th Century were actually incorrect and not true Christians to begin with. This is an arrogant and prideful belief catalyzed among churches and church people more concerned with the comings and goings of the world than that of the scriptures. The segregationists were more than biblically justified.

Mississippi Governor Ross Barnett at an Ole Miss ballgameWith Jim Crowism extinguished and its true history shrouded in lies compounded on some of its flaws, it may appear jarring to a contemporary reader to endorse the idea that current developments necessitate its partial return. Blending the elements of Jim Crowism and paternalism contains the potential for wholly positive social reformations. Though this section is largely based on predictions, idealism, and conjecture, it is not unreasonable to introduce some ideas of old segregationism into contemporary circumstances. Firstly, it is paramount to acknowledge racial differences and race relations today. Lower than they have ever been since the Civil Rights movement, it would possibly be a worthwhile idea to allow more freedom of association, allowing for differing demographics to purposefully choose which schools they enroll in, which businesses they frequent, which employees they hire, which customers they sell to, which individuals allowed into private clubs and fraternities, and which neighborhoods they live in based on racial and religious factors. This, of course, would come with the caveat of fair economic opportunities and political participation. Regarding political representation, removing the poll tax was an asininely bad move. While a poll tax per se is not necessary, providing proof of paying taxes would solve numerous issues with rooting out reprehensible characters from office and is an increasingly popular idea not uncommonly heard in public political discussions among the Southern populace. This would allow for more “voting for the person” as opposed to belligerently “voting for the party.” Lastly, focusing more so on populist policies in favor of the working and middle classes, particularly the available pipelines between the two, and social morality as opposed to focusing on political parties and racial issues would further mend relations between competing factions. These policies would not be difficult to implement and only require a modicum of common sense.

A long, arduous, and tumultuous nature often characterizes the Jim Crow era, yet in depth research of its policies and history contradict these descriptors. Upon inspection of the legal, social, and Biblical arguments, as well as the circumstances of each, of Jim Crowism only vindicates its previous implementation. The impenitent loathing contemporary society holds for such an era stems from the lies sold to it and the opposition it holds to delving deeply into its history, often prevented from encountering said history due to the suppression of sources. Understanding of segregationism and adopting a handful of its ideas opens the possibility for adopting solutions to the present irrational, preposterous social qualms which, if previously handled correctly, may not even have catalyzed.

Bibliography

1. Bilbo, Theodore G. Take Your Choice: Separation or Mongrelization. Ostara Publications, 2018.
2. Bloch, Charles Julian. States’ Rights: The Law of the Land. Harrison Co.: Atlanta, 1958.
3. Warren, Robert P. “The Briar Patch.” In I’ll Take My Stand: The South and the Agrarian Tradition, 246-264. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2006.
4. Fleming, Walter L. Civil War and Reconstruction in Alabama. New York City, NY: Columbia University Press, 1905.
5. Greene, Robert. “The Lost History of Southern Communism.” The Nation. Last modified June 8, 2020. Accessed February 15, 2022. https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/red-black-white-alabama-communist-party-mary-stanton/.
6. Hampton, Robert. “The Great Replacement: Jackson, Mississippi.” American Renaissance. Last modified July 6, 2021. Accessed February 19, 2022. https://www.amren.com/commentary/2021/07/the-great-replacement-jackson-mississippi/.
7. Henry, Mickey. Dr. Morton H. Smith: The Racial Problem Facing America. Last modified March 16, 2014. Accessed January 30, 2022. https://tribaltheocrat.com/2014/03/dr-morton-h-smith-the-racial-problem-facing-america/.
8. Hood, Gregory, Henry Wolff, and Paul Kersey. “The Great Replacement: Birmingham.” American Renaissance. Last modified August 25, 2020. Accessed February 19, 2022. https://www.amren.com/blog/2020/03/birmingham-after-desegregation/.
9. Hood, Gregory. “The Great Replacement: Baltimore.” American Renaissance. Last modified August 25, 2020. Accessed February 19, 2022. https://www.amren.com/blog/2020/08/the-great-replacement-baltimore/.
10. ———. “The Great Replacement: Richmond.” American Renaissance. Last modified August 25, 2020. Accessed February 19, 2022. https://www.amren.com/blog/2020/07/the-great-replacement-richmond/.
11. Martin, Michael. “Strom Thurmond, the ‘Dixiecrats,” and Southern Identity.” Abbeville Institute. Last modified August 21, 2019. Accessed January 30, 2022. https://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/strom-thurmond-the-dixiecrats-and-southern-identity/.
12. Martin, Michel. “How ‘Communism’ Brought Racial Equality to the South.” NPR. NPR, February 16, 2010. Last modified February 16, 2010. Accessed February 15, 2022. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123771194.
13. Oster, Grant. “The Communist Party and the Civil Rights Movement.” Hankering for History. Last modified September 10, 2013. Accessed February 15, 2022. https://hankeringforhistory.com/the-communist-party-and-the-civil-rights-movement/.
14. “Platform of the States’ Rights Democratic Party.” Platform of the States Rights Democratic Party | The American Presidency Project. Last modified August 14, 1948. Accessed January 30, 2022. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/platform-the-states-rights-democratic-party.
15. Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reason: A Yankee View. Ostara Publications, 2014.
16. Reynolds, Thorin. “A Christian View on Segregation.” In Faith and Heritage: A Christian Nationalist Anthology, 159-164. Antelope Hill Publications, 2021.
17. “Segregationists: Equal Justice Initiative.” Segregation in America. Accessed January 30, 2022. https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/segregationists.
18. Talmadge, Herman E. You and Segregation. Birmingham, AL: Vulcan Press, Inc., 1955.
19. Trotter, Jack. “The Strange Career of Segregation.” Abbeville Institute. Last modified April 1, 2020. Accessed January 30, 2022. https://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/the-strange-career-of-segregation/.
20. Woodward, C. Vann, and William S. McFeely. The Strange Career of Jim Crow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
21. Woodward, C. Vann. Origins of the New South: 1877-1913. Edited by Charles B. Dew, Wendell Holmes Stephenson, and E. Merton Coulter. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1971.

Other essays of mine regarding these, or similar, topics:

The “Old” New South and the Early Jim Crow Era: 1877 – 1913

On the Birth of Jim Crow

The Last Gasp of Southern Nationalism

The Strange Career of the American Negro

The post A Defense of Jim Crow and the South: 2nd Edition appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The International Criminal Court has only been around since 2002. However, the concept is older. Ostensibly, it’s about adjudicating war crimes and genocide, but the idea goes back to the tribunals at Nuremberg. This was mostly a Jewish operation. Although it’s famed now through their dishonest promotion, it was criticized by prominent Americans at the time as being a flagrant violation of justice.

For one thing, under a fair legal code, a crime must violate a law that existed prior to the commission of the crime. Not so with Nuremberg. Moreover, a confession obtained under threats and torture doesn’t constitute sufficient proof of guilt. It actually amounts to a reasonable doubt the accused isn’t guilty.

Third, why is something that transpires in a war criminal conduct if you lose but not if you win? One could easily make a case that any single crime corroborated by a German confession was no worse than the firebombing of Dresden, which became a signature tactic of the winning side holding the tribunals.

Starvation in concentration camps occurred under German custody, but that was in conjunction with German starvation due to blockade and bombing. Not so with the side holding the tribunals, which deliberately killed millions of Germans after the war.

If the goal is cost-effective extermination, simply put the victims in an open field and deny them sustenance. Quickly, they will lose the strength to resist and perish. The Allies proved this obvious concept using German POWs in camps on the Rhine after the war was over. There’s no need to gas anyone or build an elaborate industrial complex the size of a city.

Israel expects the leaders of the free world to stand firmly against the ICC outrageous assault on Israel’s inherent right of self-defense. We expect them to use all the means at their disposal to stop this dangerous move. pic.twitter.com/mZB85XbnSd

— Benjamin Netanyahu – בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) May 1, 2024

“they were set up to prevent such horrors, to prevent future genocides” – What he means these courts are there to punish those standing up to Jews, not to prevent Jews from conducting a genocide. He’s correct that this is outrageous to Jews.The whole point of these legal mechanisms is for Jews to use them against their victims, not prosecuting cannibals from Africa. That’s what provokes such blind rage out of Jews. These are their weapons of their contrivance, not what their enemies get to use against them. These standards set out by Jews were never meant to be applied objectively to Jews.

Also, the notion that Jews can be held accountable for their actions elicits hysteria all on its own. This is a key part of their psychology and also their Satanic religion. If you listen to the video above, such dynamics are at play behind the sheer hypocrisy and unreality of his arguments.

If you get angry and start yelling at someone, what’s your dog going to do in response? Just sit there and wag his tail or start barking and growling at the guy? There are campaign donations, the Scofield Bible, etc. On a basic level though, this is what’s going on with our Republican officials and the ICC.

It’s best to interpret the threat letter they sent to the ICC from this angle. I’m quite skeptical they possess a grasp of history and the Jews any firmer than your dog’s grasp of what’s going on with you.

"You have been warned…"

12 Republican senators sent a letter threatening Karim Khan and others at the International Criminal Court not to issue arrest warrants for Netanyahu and other key Israeli figures over their genocidal campaign in Gaza. pic.twitter.com/8q7Q8NH0Dc

— MintPress News (@MintPressNews) May 7, 2024

Netanyahu has been going on and on about the Holocaust and how the ICC will prosecute Israel. However, the ICC hasn’t announced it’d be doing anything of the sort. In other words, Republican snarling is entirely at the behest of their masters. It’s not about the merits of a particular legal case. Apparently, this threat letter against the court was from April but the public is finding out about it now.

Important to note as well is the universal legal principle that threatening the personnel of a court and their families isn’t how a case should be contested unless you’re Pablo Escobar. Collective punishment is against international law so threatening someone’s family for any reason would be a violation.

Statement of the #ICC Office of the Prosecutor pic.twitter.com/Cw331pMcDm

— Int'l Criminal Court (@IntlCrimCourt) May 3, 2024

When Jews claim there’s no moral equivalence between what Jews are doing and what anyone else has done in the past, bear in mind this has a dual meaning beyond the obvious inference that Jews should be above criticism. What they’re referring to is “moral equivalence.” You might’ve noticed they invoke this phrase quite a bit.

As Jews believe themselves alone to have souls and the rest of us to be merely disposable cattle, anything done to Jews is immeasurably worse than anything else which has ever been done to anyone else or that Jews could ever possibly do to anyone else. Whether the offense against Jews was made up by Jews isn’t the salient issue. Jewish hypocrisy can’t exist according to their understanding of reality.

Following this Satanic line of reasoning, none of the rest of us have any legitimate interests of our own. Thus, nothing a Jew could do to us would constitute a legitimate transgression. That’s how we get the bizarre sophistry entailed in the “working definition of antisemitism” from the IHRA which has overwhelming bipartisan support to become law in America:

“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

This could mean anything and thus absolutely includes every single Jewish value, action, or aspect of their influence. This is quite simple to understand, but they provide elaboration to make it seem like some other principle is at work. Here’s an example:

However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.

So, you can criticize Israel if you’re not:

Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

What this means is that since no other democratic nation has pushed 2 million people off their land and confined them in an open-air prison zone, which it’s now methodically leveling without regard to human life using American aerial bombs and demolition operations by soldiers, Israel can’t be accused of this because that would constitute antisemitism.

So, in order to not be antisemitic one would have to accuse another democratic nation of the aforementioned set of transgressions, and next criticize Israel for also committing these transgressions that the other democratic nation isn’t committing. In other words, you must negate your entire original point and present yourself as a schizophrenic.

There’s no way to reconcile Jewish power and behavior to reality. No sophistry renders this possible. The problem is compounded by their escalating misdeeds at this stage of the current iteration and the consequences for everyone else, most of whom eventually can’t help but notice. Jews are running out of time.

The post Moral Equivalence appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’ve never been one to require much convincing on the subject of things going wrong around America. Sometimes, however, in order to write for ID, I find myself having to suspend my de-sensitivity in order to maintain perspective on the sheer insanity of this place. For example, I was sipping my coffee this morning and scrolling through the Daily Mail when I came across the following headline:

How furry convention descended into orgy of sex, violence and destruction as diaper clad adults dressed as cuddly animals trashed host hotel https://t.co/mdS31HkrBN pic.twitter.com/Maqtl4Lfkf

— Daily Mail Online (@MailOnline) May 5, 2024

This isn’t exactly a subject that piques my interest, especially as someone who’s been writing about Satanic pedophiles, child trannies, nuclear war, the apocalypse, etc. Why I clicked was the sub headline with the year 2015 in it.

Back in 2015, I had no idea what a “furry” was beyond the adjective for animals just like the term “incel” and all of this other shit. If you’re a normal man born in the 80’s with a healthy frame of reference, none of it makes any sense. To illustrate, I’d spent most of 2015 working in China. I can explain the concept of “f* who dress up as animals and rail each other in the ass” in Chinese to a Chinaman. That’s easy.

The problem is that it sounds too nuts for anyone who hasn’t spent time in a country as sick as America to grasp. You might as well tell them you were abducted and probed by aliens, it makes you sound like you’re a deranged pervert just for bringing it up. China has some serious problems, but this ain’t one. They have censors who understand this stuff so they can ban it when they see it, but the average person is blissfully unaware.

If somebody did try to hold a furry convention in a Chinese city, I’m certain it would be dealt with by the authorities and never make the news as the authorities try to do with anything embarrassing to them. The citizens would go about their business ignorant of the depravity somebody attempted to perpetrate in their municipality. It’s impossible to have a functional society with demented filth being propagated. This is rather simple.

Schools told to support students who identify as 'furries' https://t.co/Xc81bpX9b3 pic.twitter.com/Xzhkjm2ZqM

— Mail+ (@DailyMailUK) April 28, 2023

Absolutely, be extremely worried.On some level, there is humor to the situation. The furry convention laid waste to a Hilton, even to the point of deliberately flooding it with sewage which then leaked into the basement and took out the hotel’s servers.

It’s legal in Seattle to be a miscreant living on the streets while getting your drug money through petty crime and these freaks still managed to get themselves banned from all hotels in the city. So, that’s really saying something:

Permanently plastered in the annals of internet history, the event started to go off the rails when someone purposely loosened a bolt on one of the Hilton Seattle Airport & Conference Center’s toilets, causing it to flood instantly.

The floor was soon filled with two inches of putrid toilet water – the first sign hosts had overestimated the wholesomeness of their guests, and were losing control.

Things only worsened from there – as attendees indulged in drink and drugs that eventually gave way to destruction. A series of arrest ensued, as attendees donned diapers and even went as far to defecate in a pool. A hot tub was also flooded, when a person shoved towels into the pump filling it with water. The hotel was left in ruins.

If you’re destroying yourself, why not destroy the hotel as well? Let’s read on:

As these diaper-wearing hooligans openly roamed the halls, others began hurling the items – some of them soiled – out onto the hotel gardens and inside its stairwells.

A few hours later, the diaper throwing phenomenon had worsened, with some being found on people’s cars, full of excrement.

‘Some people at this con are so classy,’ one attendee wrote at the time.

By the next day, the festival’s last, the hotel was in tatters.

It’s amazing the extent to which freaks are able to hold our society hostage. This particular event was called “RainFurrest” so maybe the hotel staff thought it was some sort of environmental convention. The average American is only semi-literate these days and most can’t spell correctly from their own knowledge. Honestly, If I’d only seen a few of furries, I’d probably have assumed it was for a kid’s birthday party or something.

When 2,700 of them showed up, that’s when I’d be searching for a reason to get rid of them. Hilton is a giant multinational company, the revenue involved was trivial. Somehow, the staff put up with this event until it was over. You can actually make a legal case that your company was mistreating you by making you work somewhere feces were being flung unless you signed up for a job at a mental hospital.

They had plenty of reasons to shut this thing down, but they just took the abuse instead. I’ve heard the America described as an “open air insane asylum“. This isn’t a bad description, but asylums are there to treat the patient’s insanity or in the very least, keep them away from everyone else. Is that what’s going on around here?

I’m not sure where this furry thing came from but I’m pretty sure it hasn’t been around for very long and thus it can be hailed as an evil spawned in our modern nightmare. Trannies pop up on historical timelines right before catastrophe. They’re not a new thing.

I’m not sure how to interpret the furries in this regard, because we’ve never seen them before. Adolf Hitler never made speeches about how the Jews wouldn’t be turning any more Germans into teddy bears, for instance. To the best of my knowledge, nobody was dressing up as cartoon animals during the late states of Rome, either. We’ll just have to wait and find out, that’s the fun part about America.

The post Overestimated Wholesomeness appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Since the October 7th Hamas attacks on Israelis, the Left is divided. They are all same team each November, but right now there is a major rift between owners, the managers and the shop floor. The latest manifestation of this is the campus protest phenomenon. Because of the locations, this creates a spectacle made for video and poor optics for the Left. The Right should sit back and let the Left decide how these end.

Never intervene when the other guy is messing up. This should not be hard. It involves patience and standing firm. We have examples even in our recent political history. A famous American political example of the Napoleon quote “never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake” was the 1964 presidential campaign between LBJ and Barry Goldwater. JFK’s assassination created a subdued early campaign, the GOP went through a bitter liberal wing-conservative wing primary fight and Goldwater spent months promoting his true conservative nature, which was a bit out of step with the national mood. No Republican was winning in ‘64, but Goldwater underperformed as the electoral realignment was just getting started. During the 1964 campaign, Johnson’s team refrained from directly engaging with Goldwater’s more conservative positions, allowing Goldwater to make critical mistakes that the media could frame as extreme.

LBJ’s campaign team recognized the opportunity presented by Goldwater’s polarizing positions. Rather than directly attacking Goldwater or debating his ideas, Johnson’s team used a strategy of amplifying Goldwater’s more controversial statements and letting voters infer. The most famous examples of this strategy occurred with the release of the “Daisy” advertisement. The television ad featured a young girl counting daisy petals while a voiceover counted down to a nuclear explosion, juxtaposed with images of nuclear destruction. The implication was clear. Goldwater’s statements on nuclear weapons in Vietnam could lead to catastrophic consequences. While the ad never mentioned Goldwater by name, its message resonated with voters and reinforced concerns about Goldwater’s judgment and temperament. LBJ just let Goldwater talk.

The Right should sit tight, watching as deep blue cities and college administrators figure out how to handle protests. If they are soft, pro-Israel donors might change their 2024 plans. Voters at home will see chaos and woke mobs running wild. Chaos from protests helped Trump in 2016. If they beat down protesters, it is more chaos for voters to watch in already disorderly cities and the unique exception on the Left is reinforced demoralizing the Far Left and setting up a tense convention in Chicago. Maybe the Far Left stays home or protest votes in November. Biden’s team is caught catering to the AIPAC donor list and swing state Muslims. Let Biden and his hierarchy of political figures take the fall angering on side. Jumping in only substitutes a red flavored police villain for a blue one.

Let the Left police their own. This is an intra-Left battle. They are just fighting over the control of those education institutions and rhetoric that the Left will deploy for this small, foreign affair. College administrators are in a bind, but let them squirm. The pro-Israel donors have to realize that every single action they take now while still maintaining loyalty to the Left is doomed. They can blacklist doxxed protesters, but there are thousands who silently agree with the ideology. Those silent students will fill the institutions and have the same beliefs as the handful blacklisted. They lost the universities, and BDS measures were just a warning. If this is a fight between woke students, blue cities and anti-West administrators, let them sort it out.

-By Fred Watson Jr

The post Shame They Can’t Both Lose appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

It cannot be ignored that the White race, including Dixians, are facing dire demographic circumstances. It’s a trend that has hit every White country, including nations like Ireland where just 30 years ago large families were the norm rather than the exception. In some cases, the demographic decline has been going on for so long it can no longer be realistically fixed, as the last sizable generation of women are now past birthing age. Thankfully, Dixie is not at this point. Though our problems are great, they can be resolved, although this will not be an easy task. But remember – we are advocating for nothing less than a Free Dixie – a nation we can call our own – arising like a phoenix from the ashes of a decadent Yankee Empire. Nothing Southern Nationalists are fighting for can be easily won. And, in this struggle, assuring the survival of our people is absolutely paramount. There can be no Dixie if there are no Dixians.

We must reproduce more; it really is as simple as that. The reason for the decline of the White race is due to a decline in the White birthrate, not an insurmountably high birthrate from non-Whites. That point is important, because far too many in the Dissident Right have assumed that the non-White populations are especially high when they’re not. In the United States, their birthrate is, at best, barely above the replacement rate. It’s important to note that, because that assumption often leads many on the Dissident Right to go down a path that ends up backfiring – namely open support for racially specific abortions that only serve to horrify Christians. The path to victory must lie in increasing our own birthrate. Above all else, remember that victory is ours for the taking. With that being said, there are several steps I believe can increase our Southern birthrate. These will be outlined below and should in no way be considered as an extensive or exhaustive list.

Normalize Large FamiliesLately, I’ve been reading several articles about North American families, who, upon realizing what a threat to their souls the United States has become, have decided to move their families to Russia. And while I do understand their reasoning, this is not something I can endorse. For almost 400 years my family has called Dixie our home. I will stay and fight for her.

Still, something I did notice is how much better received these families are in Russia than they are in the American Empire. While large families are met with bewilderment, stares, and disparaging remarks in the United States, in Russia, they are seen as a positive good. To increase our birthrate, we must welcome large Dixian families with open arms. Treat these families as a blessing for Dixie, because they are. Large families will form the backbone of Southern freedom.

Discourage the DINK MentalityDINKs (“Dual Income, No Kids”) are those that are proudly child free and have no intention of ever having children (other than “fur babies”), as that would cut into their free time. Obviously, we should give people the benefit of the doubt here. There are people, through no fault of their own, that cannot have children. And since this is a deeply personal, sensitive subject, it does make sense they would not want to talk about it. However, those who are boastfully child-free and belittle those that have children are a very different matter. Such a mentality has no place in Dixie, and those who encourage it should be ashamed. It is important to remember just how unnatural this mentality is. Humans are biological creatures and want to reproduce – we instinctively want to pass down our genes. The rise of the DINKs reveals a society completely out of touch with biological reality and in its death stage. To save our land, we must fight against this antinatalism psychology tooth and nail.

Pro-Family ProgramsI think there is also a place for pro-family government programs in a Free Dixie. Though many on the Right balk at this notion, we must understand that we are in an emergency situation and any and all measures to get us out of this demographic predicament must be on the table. We can do as Hungary has done, and offer direct payments to parents for each child they have. It should be noted that we cannot adopt the anti-family policies of the Great Society. Rather, the payments will only be for two-parent, legally married, families with reasonable exceptions being made in the case of the death of a spouse or abandonment. But those are the exceptions, as a general rule, this program will be used for nationalistic and pro-family ends. Such policies are common for nationalist governments, as they understand their future lies in the youth. We must take from them as a means of getting out of this demographic spiral.

Could such a program be abused? Perhaps, though steps can be taken to minimize such abuses. But none of this will matter if we are rendered a permanent minority in our own land.

Studying history reveals what an outlier the United States, especially since 1960, has become, with particular attention needed on how the American Right understood the world. The hyper-individualistic Right of this era, with its emphasis on limiting the number of its children and bragging about how soon they can get their children to leave the house, is in stark contrast to almost all other societies in history. Multi-generational households and desiring large families was once common sense. It is no surprise that, in rejecting all of these bedrock principles, the American post-World War II populace lost their nation so quickly. They were working on a foundation of sand, whereby capitalism, which in practice meant little more than complete deference to Big Business, was more valued than the nation. The chickens are coming home to roost and the United States is in its last days.

By bringing back the pro-family mentality of healthy societies, Dixie can arise from the chaos and take her place among the nations of the world.

The post Be Fruitful and Multiply appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

While most of Biden’s administration is blamed on the geriatric Yankee from Scranton, Pennsylvania, many on the Right seem to forget he has an entire cabinet (his handlers) who are largely doing the real day-to-day work while Biden eats ice cream. Many on the Dissident Right like to point out the large number of Jews in the Biden cabinet, which is certainly a true fact, but many neglect to mention just how non-Southern the cabinet actually is. In this article, we’ll examine the origins and some of the background of Biden’s wicked cabinet of crooks.

Let’s start out with the cackling witch herself, Kamala Harris. Harris’ whoring career and gender is often the topic surrounding her, but one should also consider her racial origin. Her mother was Shyamala Gopalan born in British India in 1938, while her father, Donald J. Harris, is a Jamaican mulatto. Neither were even born in the United States but instead allowed in during the 1960s, met at the notorious UC Berkeley, and had Kamala in 1964. Clearly, her family is anything but “American,” much less Southern. Moving onto the Big Three: Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen. All three are Jewish. Garland is from Chicago, Illinois and Blinken is from Yonkers, New York. The Federal Reserve “Queen” Yellen was born in Brooklyn, New York before making the trip to California to teach at, of course, UC Berkeley.

The next member of the Biden administration is Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, who Republicans recently tried, and like usual, failed to impeach. Mayorkas wasn’t even born in the United States but instead Cuba. His parents were Cuban (and Jewish) refugees who fled and brought baby Mayorkas with them much to the detriment of Dixie and Heritage America. While making a pit stop in Florida, they would make the leap to Los Angeles, California. Another fun reminder is Alejandro Mayorkas graduated from UC Berkeley in 1981. Wonder if he ever ran into Professor Yellen, although I don’t care enough to look that up.

Finishing off with the B-team members of the cabinet, let’s move to the Confederate-hating Sectary of Defense Lloyd Austin. Austin (spoiler) is the only member of the cabinet actually from a Southern state, born in Alabama and raised in Georgia. However, Austin is black and, thus like many of his racial peers, has nothing but hate for traditional Alabama and Georgia. Austin does probably win the contest when it comes to tracing his ancestry the furthest back on “American soil.” That actually may not be true if you count Pueblo Injun Deb Haaland, who was born in Arizona although she defines herself as New Mexican, or “35th generation New Mexican” to be exact. To nobody’s surprise, Creepy Joe made her Secretary of the Interior.

Compared to Secretary of Labor Julie Sue, she may indeed be very “American.” If you can’t tell from the name, Sue is Asian and specifically Chinese, though she was born in Wisconsin before her Chinese/Taiwanese parents moved out to California. Julie Sue, at least, didn’t attend UC Berkeley. Speaking of California, I should probably mention the last Californian in the cabinet – this is Secretary of Health and Human Resources Xavier Becerra. Becerra, despite being born in California, has Mexican parents, which makes him Mexican in my book. Although, at this rate, he can probably just call himself a Californian. He did serve as the state’s attorney general during the Trump administration.

Moving away from the West Coast, we should inspect the rest of the cabinet starting with the rainbow flag carrying Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigeig, former mayor of South Bend, Indiana. South Bend is only a few miles south of Michigan and very far away from the more culturally Southern part of the state near Kentucky. South Bend is also the home and resting place of Radical Republican Schuyler Colfax, who was Grant’s running mate in 1868 when the two campaigned on crushing Southern backlash to Reconstruction (a mere trivia fact and one which is fitting with the reputation of South Bender Pete).

Moving west of South Bend and the far western flank of Yankeedom, we see the adopted home of longtime Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack. Vilsack was born and raised in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and went further north to get his education in upstate New York at Hamilton College. Vilsack would proceed to make the move to Iowa, where he’d be elected governor in 1998 and again in 2002. From there, the native Pennsylvanian would get recruited by Obama as his Secretary of Agriculture in 2009. One can speculate this is due to Yankee Iowa voting for Obama the year prior and Mr. Vilsack being out of a job, unless you count his brief campaign for president the year prior. Either way, Biden decided to make him the Secretary of Agriculture again in 2021.

Traveling north of the increasingly conservative-turning Iowa, we have Secretary of Veteran Affairs Denis McDonough of Minnesota, who supposedly has communist sympathies, served in the Obama administration, and is actually not a veteran. Circling over to Michigan, we have Canadian-born Jennifer Granholm, the Secretary of Energy. She, like Vilsack, served as governor of her state from 2003 to 2011, giving Yankee Michiganders a preview of a jezebel governorship before they asked for second helpings in 2018 by electing Gretchen Whitmer. Granholm was actually born in Vancouver, British Columbia to Canadian parents. I should also mention she graduated from UC Berkeley in 1984.

No anti-Southern cabinet would be complete without a few New Englanders and Biden, like usual, didn’t forget about them. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo was Governor of Rhode Island (2015-2021). The last cabinet member is Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona whose parents are Puerto Rican. Despite this, Connecticut Yankees felt confident enough to elect him their Commissioner of Education in 2018, which he served as until being tapped as another Latino Affirmative Action hire by Creepy Joe in 2021. Currently, he’s trying to shut down the largest Christian university in the United States at the behest of the purple haired tattooed Yankee Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro.

To sum things up, Biden’s cabinet is everything our Confederate ancestors warned us about. The executive branch is effectively a gaggle of foreigners, Yankees, “people of color,’” and Jews, headed by a career liar who can barely speak half the time. There’s not a single Southerner in the cabinet. Austin, the only black in the cabinet, is there to appease blacks in Georgia and the Deep South who like the idea of a strong black man in uniform. The state of the executive branch is a testament to just how much Southerners have lost control of the Democratic Party, the United States, and even the ability to get token gestures. The Biden administration clearly hates Dixie. They also hate “Middle America,” as the only person in the cabinet from that region is maybe Vilsack. He was last serving as governor in 2007, well over a decade ago. It’s quite telling that Biden (and his handlers) didn’t even bother picking a Latino or Blue Dog Democrat from Texas or Florida.

Let this show all Southerners and Heritage America that we need to focus on secession and not trying to reform the American Empire. This new America, one where secession doesn’t happen, is going to be reflective of Biden’s cabinet. There’s no fixing the Union, only breaking away from it.

When Dixie secedes, we will make sure to have none of the scum of Biden’s regime in our new Southern executive branch.

-By Dixie Anon

The post Biden’s Handlers and their Origins appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

A set of salient issues escape the comprehension of what appears to be a majority of the population. For example: climate change, green energy, the war in Ukraine, or migration. For issues like migration, they seem to suddenly get it once they’re inundated personally but no reaction is elicited based on pondered implications when they see it in the media happening someplace else.

Certain attributes that lead to credulity are obvious: ignorance, disinterest, stupidity, and a need to believe that things are going fine because, on an emotional level, the implications otherwise would be unbearable. Unfortunately, many white people will also calibrate their opinions based on what’s marketed to them as the view of the moral and sophisticated in contrast to the proles’ take on things. Reason or evidence plays no role in this orientation. I’ve written about this quite a bit.

Then, we have the logical fallacies to which many are susceptible. Principally, if “experts” are making a point, it must be true or if everyone believes something this is evidence of its validity, and the most tiresome, that exceptions disprove a rule. Often the exceptions are from a movie, such as a black woman being a brilliant non-diversity scientist.

The COVID vaccines are the most frightening demonstration thus far that some combination of the aforementioned deficiencies blind most of the population. This must have been figured out by nefarious entities long before we had to live through the proof of this concept or even prior to Edward Bernays setting up shop. How could a “mark of the beast” function if everyone said “no“, or even half the people refused?

Another issue is a sort of narcissistic confirmation bias. What I mean is that the lack of contradictions being presented to someone from an elite group, along with the perception that its members can tell the masses anything without consequences, seems to give their dishonesty and disingenuous intentions credibility inside their own psyche. Perhaps this is a purely Jewish phenomenon, but it would explain why the neocons, including their current mascot Antony Blinken, can move from debacle to debacle self-assured of themselves despite the escalatory nature of these debacles.

Syria's president when arrived to #China: red carpet, guard of honor.

Blinken when arrived to China: no red carpet, no guard of honor, just a low level official to greet him, clear humiliation, you are NOT welcome here.

The images show the condition of US China relations.

A… pic.twitter.com/jLR1vaDLkG

— Indo-Pacific News – Geo-Politics & Defense (@IndoPac_Info) April 28, 2024

Setting all of this aside, there’s a phenomenon that doesn’t appear to get discussed. I’ll refer to it as an inability to perform realistic abstraction. To illustrate, many people, including my former comrades with advanced military educations, can’t consider in abstraction something for which they have no personal reference, despite the clarity of the math.

For instance, HIMARS was supposed to be this system that would stop the Russian military in its tracks. Well, the Russians have a variety of MLRS systems but 1,200 of the closest equivalents to HIMARs are on active duty and roughly 2,000 are in storage. What difference is a handful of HIMARs supposed to make? Conventional artillery shells comprise the vast majority of what’s been fired anyways. The fact that the scale of this conflict is something for which the GWOT furnishes no insights might explain why they put so much faith in the notion.

This applies to many aspects of the conflict, which features a line of contact that would stretch from DC down to the middle of Florida. The modern United States has never operated on this scale, is it a wonder they think small quantities of equipment can make a difference?

Iraq was basically contested along a corridor from Basra to Baghdad. How could anyone with this conflict as their frame of reference think like the Russian General Staff planning World War 3 in Ukraine with the experiences of World War 2 in Ukraine in mind? This differential alone would explain quite a bit.

General Petraeus is a true warrior scholar. https://t.co/9RyNwaQGgO

— John Spencer (@SpencerGuard) December 3, 2023

A war on Russia in Russia isn’t working without our brilliant tactics, that’s it. If only he’d been there to advise Napoleon or the Wehrmacht. You could scale that up to the ratio of the Earth to the Sun, a ball of superheated plasma so massive by comparison that the Earth orbits around it. Leaving the chemistry aside, which is going to have a decisive effect on the Earth’s temperature? The varying heat put off by the Sun or carbon? Nobody really has a frame of reference from their daily life about how big this planet even is, let alone the Sun. Once pondered, it boggles the mind.

Many people are comforted by the idea of wind turbines, devices they’ve been told are green saviors of an existential crisis. Provide them with the data on the annual output of a given nuclear plant and do the math on how many wind turbines (the term “windmills” gets used because this evokes pre-industrial agriculture) based on average output it would take to replace this plant. Visualizing all of these turbines in a row would be quite a stretch, or even where to find enough flat land to create the epic bird killing line. This, however, requires some intellectual curiosity and appreciation for scale.

Reaching net-zero will rely on massive #cleanelectrification.

Six key actions in the 2020s will enable the required scale up in electricity deployment.

Action 4: Streamlining planning and permitting, within an integrated power system vision. pic.twitter.com/DBg6lsUICZ

— Energy Transitions Commission (@ETC_energy) April 29, 2024

The more cynical among us realize the world isn’t a cartoon. Therefore, you can’t just draw what you want and add captions. I suppose this brings me to my final point for today: to successfully confront lies and nonsense, one must point it out, counter with the truth, and then explain why most people have accepted the contrary thus far. But, somebody would have to keep an open mind and be interested in the first place.

Even though the percentage of the population to which these two conditions apply is rather low, our potential audience is vast enough that producing content is a worthwhile endeavor. I suppose I’ll leave it on a good note today.

The post Principles of Discernment appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

We’re faced with a lot going on in our lives. Many of these things will transpire later and are potentially beyond our ability to influence. Therefore, it’s natural to feel a certain level of unease, usually in proportion to our cognizance of such matters. In the white community, we refer to this unwelcome sensation as “stress.”

Moreover, there are many actions we’d like to take, but must desist due to our innate orientation towards the future consequences such actions would incur. We simply can’t help ourselves in this regard. Ours is quite a stifling existence.

Often, I feel the self-imposed oppression on my life as an invisible force freezing me to the ground, preventing me from leaping towards desire. Frigid, like the blue blood flowing through my Caucasian veins, yet without the warm promise of renewal as it pumps once again through my heavy heart.

A bus driver in Oklahoma was brutally attacked by an enraged passenger, resulting in a major crash … and it was all caught on video! pic.twitter.com/Y4J3DFWet7

— TMZ (@TMZ) April 25, 2024

No reason is mentioned, not that anybody expected one. I often find myself opining on various matters: society, history, geopolitics, rhetoric, various technical topics, profound questions of good versus evil. What’s this really doing to lighten up my day? You see, my interest in all of these things manifests itself concordantly with my inability to live in the moment and take various actions as it would please me to do so.

If I was just doing what I felt like doing whenever I felt like doing it, I wouldn’t find myself mired in this intellectual morass. I would, however, find myself mired in prison, a hospital ward, or an early grave. Taking heed of potentialities, I’m incapable of squaring this circle.

If I was black though, such geometric abstractions would flutter around the ether beyond my consciousness. The cross-disciplinary inclination to apply pretty much any math at all to my journey through life would consist perhaps of simple arithmetic while I listened to the judge at my sentencing, such as could be imparted to me during my time at ~~a warehouse~~ school.

Again, as a black man, I wouldn’t bother much with the math. But still, it’d probably be interesting trying to link a present consequence to a past action without being able to grasp the mystery. Questions are easy but the answers instill doubt. You see, if I were to shoot a sandwich artist in the face at Subway over mayonnaise, I’d already know where I’d be spending the rest of my days. Where’s the fun in that? This form of prescience feels claustrophobic.

That’s why it’d be fascinating to ponder the quandary as if trying to identify a Lorenz Strange Attractor within an unfathomably complex system. Then, I’d shout “fuck you cracka bitch!” as hurled myself over the bench to pummel the judge.

She deserves it, so you act. Justice is the only concern. To quote T.S. Elliot:

Between the emotion
And the response
Falls the Shadow

This is actually an unbearably white inhibition. T.S. Elliot characterizes it for what it is, a shadow that cowers us in sadness. He shall not tremble in silence beside the banks of the tumid river:

This is why I delight in the levity of the African American experience. Below, we’re treated to the spectacle of a cafeteria confrontation. Metaphorically speaking, white school officials are supposed to pour cold water on such encounters. Moreover, white people know that insults are insufficient legal justification for physical violence. That’s why it happens mostly outside of bars in our context, with the belligerent actions being fueled by alcohol.

The student in the video below appears to be a connoisseur of legumes perhaps around the age of 13, although in terms of leaf blowers, age is just a number. Au contraire, age is more than just a number when a teacher attacks a student. The fact that a teacher beat a student can put decades onto what otherwise would be a scuffle in terms of incarceration. That number might be one to behold.

NEW: Las Vegas substitute teacher arrested after fighting student who allegedly called him the n-word

Re'Kwon Smith, 27, was recorded punching a student during a cafeteria fight at Valley High School in east Las Vegas

Police arrested both the student and teacher

Smith now… pic.twitter.com/k1UVJsiTJY

— Unlimited L's (@unlimited_ls) April 26, 2024

Substitutes have no licensing exams, so it’s actually probably more difficult to get hired as a prison guard. Ain’t that America. At age 27, one could be placed in a significant position of leadership. This is the average age of a captain in the U.S. Army, for example. Again, this imposes such burdens as leadership, forethought, and nuance. If you’re black, 27 is still young enough not to take disrespect from anyone. In many ways, that’s a better deal.

In that moment, which to them has the psychological dimensions of a tunnel, rules don’t apply. It’s simply the thrill of the pursuit. The honor both preserved and won through the epic struggle of combat. Again, this is me applying white idealism embodied in historical deeds like the charge of the Scots Greys at the Battle of Waterloo. We make things so complicated for ourselves.

Unfortunately, the African American impulse reaction results in a crime scene and a brief story on the evening news rather than a legendary painting by Lady Butler. How many times have we come across a story featuring “mass shooting” in conjunction with “rap concert“, “night club“, “block party“, “state fair“, etc.? They don’t even get acknowledged for being black, it’s always some euphemism.

If I were black, this would piss me off. Then again, black people don’t care about the news. Must be nice. Introspection is a burden all its own, I’d rather be looting. But, I don’t. I guess that’s for another article.

JUST IN: 10 people wounded in mass shooting during event in #Sanford, Florida; 16-year-old in custody, investigators say. @livenowfox https://t.co/4AqGI6jgHH

— Josh Breslow (@JoshBreslowTV) April 28, 2024

The post To Be Capable of Such Levity… appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

It goes without saying that any visitor to this website is familiar with the text of the Second Amendment; I would also expect that every reader owns at least one firearm, be it a rifle or a pistol. The discourse surrounding the Second Amendment in the United States has always been a contentious one, between those who understand that liberty comes from the end of a gun and those who ought to be on the receiving end of one.

In particular, the topic of fully-automatic firearms is one that has seen the de facto criminalization of such weapons from reaching the hands of the average citizen. The Left says that these are “weapons of war,” and calls for banning “assault weapons” (semi-automatic weapons that look scary to liberals who’ve never shot a gun). Whereas, the Right invokes “shall not be infringed” to protect the right to bear said weapons; although, the mainstream Right is very hesitant to advocate for fully-automatic firearms in the hands of the citizenry. But it is here where the Left is correct, but for the wrong reasons: it is true that fully-automatic weapons are designed specifically for war as they make killing the enemy a whole lot easier – however, that quality is why having them in the hands of the citizenry is so important. Expecting normal citizens to fight against foreign invaders or tyrannical governments with lever-action rifles, shotguns, or semi-automatic AR-15s only is absurd and makes the preservation of liberty and national sovereignty much more difficult.

That being said, it must also be noted that the Second Amendment was written for the purposes of arming “well-regulated” militias, not guys who want a shiny new toy to play with at the gun range. Revolution and warfare are serious issues, and too many on the Right want the benefits without any the duties that follow. I (and surely you, too) have seen copious social media posts from “patriots” who genuinely believe that, if a mass gun confiscation or civil war were to occur, they would break out their gun safe and wait patiently for the Feds to come to their neighborhood, going door-to-door, entering in single-file lines as they shoot them and any Tannerite traps in their house in a Rambo-style Home Alone strategy. As comical a scenario as this sounds, too many believe this and think nothing more of it. The grim reality is that if the government really wanted to disarm the population, there are far better ways of doing so – and indeed, some of the things I will list they have done. They can:

1. Criminalize self-defense; you shoot someone who is clearly threatening your life or property, enjoy being dragged through the courts and losing everything via lawfare, assuming you aren’t also found guilty by one of their corrupt prosecutors.
2. Red Flag Laws, to legally strip someone of their gun rights without due process.
3. Shut off your bank account and utilities and keep doing so until you break.
4. Have kids? One day they’ll go to school and never come back; you’ll get a letter from the government saying that, for the safety of your children, they have been moved to another state and will not be returned until every gun is turned in.

There are more ways not mentioned, but the point is that they don’t have to go full Lexington and Concord to get what they want. Your rights can easily be stripped away without even a single shot fired. So, what is to be done, not just for the current situation but in a future where Dixie is a free country? Si vis pacem, para bellum.

We must recognize that it is not the weapons in themselves that win wars, but the people becoming proficient in them and coordinating in all things, like logistics, OPSEC, and organizational structure. These things take time and effort, and the best place to hone these skills are in a militia where one can meet like-minded compatriots to train for the defense of the homeland. Southern governors, mayors, and aldermen ought to pass laws that allow for the ownership of fully-automatic weapons for all Southern citizens provided they join a militia where they can train and be organized against those hostile to our people and nation. Under this legal system, the guns themselves are not registered – one can be a member of a militia while only possessing something simple like a revolver; it merely allows for anonymity in regards to ownership of various gun types, while simultaneously demanding a degree of civic responsibility from those who wish to step up their arsenal and purchase a M249 SAW. Be it checking a tyrannical abuse or defense of your locality, it is good to be prepared in material and training, and such an act would allow for both.

Note: This is not a FedPost, nor should it be construed in any fashion as condoning, approving, or advocating for illegal activity. Rather, a commentary for fully-automatic weapons in the hands of the citizenry of a Free Dixie.

The post Gun Rights Revisited appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In the Anglo context, it’s not as if Jews haven’t been wormed into power for years. In the past though, it wasn’t so overt. For instance, the British elite from Edward VII to Winston Churchill had been in debt to the Jews and also morally bankrupt.

It’s not just the bribes, it’s always the money in combination with elite character flaws that gets Jews what they want. It was the same thing with Woodrow Wilson. The average person wouldn’t have known about any of this stuff at the time, and still doesn’t know our political leadership is making decisions based on Jewish interests due to their personal greed and other character flaws.

However, Americans back then didn’t have the modern Republican Party being so pathetically slavish to the Jews. There are many things to cringe over, but this is among the most egregious. Imagine thinking that campus protests are the biggest problem facing America these days. Republicans aren’t going to do anything about our existential problems. They can’t even vote for some farcical border security measures, but campus protests put them into hysterics.

Today, I saw firsthand the radical mob Columbia has allowed to run amok on campus, spouting antisemitism and threatening Jewish students.

If universities don’t get it under control, it will escalate.

Taxpayer dollars should not be going to institutions that allow this chaos. pic.twitter.com/drFd8WCuqJ

— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) April 25, 2024

Republicans can’t even accept that if Jews are conducting a genocide funded and facilitated by America in full view of the world, students are going to protest about it on campus. That’s just inevitable. Jews get to do the genocide, they get the money and the weapons, but they can’t also get exemption from criticism at American schools. What they’re doing is too evil for that one.

Students feel good about themselves for protesting a genocide and, as leftists, they can’t appreciate the amount of leverage that Jews have over their lives because that’s only something that a Nazi would believe. They also can’t comprehend that Israel is the same thing as “the Jews“, since that would be an antisemitic canard, and thus are unable to fathom why all of the Jews are freaking out about them.

They feel a moral confirmation about protesting genocide, and there’s a lot of them so it’s hard to ruin every single life as was done to the Charlottesville protesters. This presents a conundrum for the Jews, as ruling based on lies always does.

Republicans are calling for another Kent State Massacre and the police are getting quite rough with these students, unlike with BLM when they were free to rampage. This is something that people notice, and not just people like ourselves. Sure, there are MAGA types who like to see leftist protesters beaten up and arrested but that’s not a decisive demographic in America.

Biden is chained to his pro-Hamas base that is overrun by the same bougie jihadists threatening violence on college campuses

Send in the National Guard to protect Jewish students pic.twitter.com/xEMwlUKnws

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) April 25, 2024

Pro-Hamas base? This is even more retarded than the CCP stuff. Did they send in the national guard to protect white people during the BLM carnage? Nope, and white people were under serious threat of physical harm. It’s all rather obvious that Jews are exercising massive influence in America. It doesn’t help having a rat run the state department and another be in charge of the border.

Potential puppets abound, but they don’t even have the finesse to use them anymore. This is late stage for them. There don’t seem to be any Bernard Baruch figures left. With each new debacle, there’s a group of Jews as its face. We have an administration run overtly by Jews, and a Republican “opposition” that worships them. Mostly, Jews used to just be “advisors” or “businessmen“.

The other thing working against them is that Jews always cite bogus atrocities. The 6 million of them who were exterminated in the Holocaust wasn’t even the first time they claimed 6 million of them were killed. They accused the Russians of this in the late nineteenth century in order to open up the West to Jewish migration out of the Russian Empire.

6 is the number of points on their demonic star, so it’s not hard to see how they arrived at this figure. As far as gas is concerned, the first time this accusation seems to have been employed was nearly 2,000 years earlier against the residents of Alexandria, Egypt. It was claimed they were killing Jews with smoke because they’d become exhausted by the physicality of murdering so many Jews.

With these atrocity frauds, there’s always a sadistic sexual component as the perpetrators lose all semblance of their humanity to some sort of madness. With the Jews, it’s the same thing every single time. They’re always lying, swindling, exploiting, abusing, bribing the elites, and they’re always accusing others of horrific atrocities committed without any legitimate motive.

This how the Germans get accused of using masturbation machines on Holocaust victims or Hamas gets accused of cutting off breasts to play soccer with them while they’re battling a much larger and more sophisticated military force. In reality, this is just what’s going on in the mind of a Jew.

That’s also how we get Hamas burning up babies in ovens instead of something more original. Entire cities full of Germans and Japanese were incinerated at the behest of Jews to force unconditional surrender in World War 2, which neither country wanted and could’ve been negotiated to a favorable outcome for the Allies without such slaughters. Naturally, Jews accused the Germans of burning them up. Another thing they always do is accuse others of their crimes.

U.S Speaker Mike Johnson says Israeli infants were "cooked in ovens" on October 7 pic.twitter.com/hE55ZWcZaw

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) April 24, 2024

This time around, the crime they’re committing is so blatant that accusing their victims of trying to genocide Jews isn’t working on leftists. Republicans will parrot anything that Jews say, but that’s not going to mollify leftists on a campus, especially since they think Republicans are racists and despise them anyways. Mike Johnson, for example, has a black career criminal son who helps verify his “father” isn’t looking at porn using religious software.

Speaker Johnson was pro Floyd, pro BLM riots and now wants the national guard to intervene in an anti Israeli war movement pic.twitter.com/UbtBntKJHP

— The_Real_Fly (@The_Real_Fly) April 25, 2024

Still a racist. Leftists understand the political situation in America just about as well as the average viewer of Fox News. There’s nothing the Republicans could ever do to prove they’re not racists. Saying they support immigration, but they just want it to be legal, is of zero utility. That’s simply who they are as Republicans, the party exclusively for white people.

So, Republican support for Israel’s genocide of brown people just makes sense in this context. Threatening to crush protesters doesn’t help their case, either. That Republicans are actually in support of an anti-white Jewish agenda as part of a fake political dialectic is something only Jews and dissidents could understand.

Eisenhower sent the 101st to Little Rock.
It’s time for Biden to call out the National Guard at our universities to protect Jewish Americans

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) April 22, 2024

Still a racist. When Jews can be verified to slaughtering babies in mass numbers, claiming without any proof that they’re not slaughtering babies in mass numbers, because Hamas was baking babies alive simply doesn’t work. Many find the comprehensive demolition of an area containing 2 million people outrageous, especially while they’re still inside of it.

In World War 2, there were serious misgivings about the terror bombing campaigns. Incinerating the population of a city isn’t a Christian tactic but nobody got to see how ugly that was up close through the media. As media technology changed, the bombing of Vietnam provoked mass outrage.

There were specific photos like the little girl running out of a napalmed village that set people off. Such images have been coming out of Gaza every day for over 6 months. In 2024, the Jews are just doing their usual thing, but everybody gets to watch and discuss on social media and Jews can’t curtail themselves in response. It’s the same thing every time, but the times change.

The nascent pogroms at Columbia have to stop TODAY, before our Jewish brethren sit for Passover Seder tonight. If Eric Adams won’t send the NYPD and Kathy Hochul won’t send the National Guard, Joe Biden has a duty to take charge and break up these mobs.

— Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) April 22, 2024

The best part about all of this is how Republicans barking for the blood of protesters against a genocide of brown people just makes it worse. How the Jewish pysop on America finally implodes remains to be seen, but this is a crucial part in that implosion, to be sure. The campus protests might just end with the semester, but the credibility of this Jewish system isn’t coming back.

In the meantime, I recommend the movie Zulu. This scene is what immediately popped into my mind when I saw all these Republicans calling for force.

The post Crush Them! appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

``` Author’s Preface: As we all know, Southern history has been subjected to damnatio memoriae. As such, it is fit that this Southern Separatist website do all it can to preserve all aspects of Dixie's long, storied, and grim history.

The primary source and inspiration for this essay is Origins of the New South by C. Vann Woodward; however, the other sources listed at the end provided additional information as well. This essay was very comprehensive and can seem a bit vague; I cannot recommend Woodward's book enough and highly encourage you to read it. ```

Fifteen years have gone over the South, and she still sits crushed, wretched, busy displaying and bemoaning her wounds.

Whitelaw Reid in the New York Tribune, 1880

Damnatio memoriae is a Latin phrase which translates to “condemnation of memory.” This is the practice of erasing something from history, typically applied to a person. The phrase, while Latin, does not originate from Rome, despite being an action Romans commonly did, but supposedly originated in a thesis written in Germany in 1689. 21st Century Dixieland finds itself squarely within a macabre cocktail of damnatio memoriae and Neo-Abolitionist historiography it must unwilfully ingest at the behest of the impenitent, loathsome Potomac Regime imperialists and third-world immigrants. Whatever the current Leftist System deems useful history to utilize is subjected to a post-Civil Rights Era filter whilst the rest is erased from history and collective memory. The early Jim Crow and New South Era stands as a testament to this grievous erasure and malicious propaganda, arguably the most butchered period of Southern and American history. There has been a respectable catalogue of works over the years discussing the various historical topics and events of the period, but a sore few books and essays exist providing detailed defenses of the South or its perspective, much less an objective one. A dark, abhorrent, and appallingly bestial period of tumultuous political and societal movements punctuated by the ghosts of the ravaging of scorched earth warfare, social upheaval and inversion, collapse of established shibboleths, iconoclasm, industrialization, Christian Great Awakenings, economic suppression, and abject indigence comprised the early Jim Crow period and directly catalyzed its de jure birth. Commonly used as a moniker for moving Dixie forward into the Gilded Age and modernization of the 20th Century, the “New South” as a descriptor most prominently found usage during this same late-19th Century. This essay will discuss and detail this time between 1877 and 1913 which was the origin and genesis of the Jim Crow Era and the beginning of the New South.

To address the largest elephant in the room for this particular time in history, the beginnings of the Jim Crow era are not as black and white as often purported by the ignorant educated elite of the 21st Century, as stated multiple times in other essays published here. It is the looming shadow over that Southern “dark age” which haunts the era and relegates it to the forgotten aisle in the historic library. A multitude of social movements and changes occurred during this time and were instrumental in the organic development of segregationism and restrictions on voting rights.

The de jure Jim Crow South did not truly begin until 1890 in the state of Mississippi. Rural Southern populism spread like wildfire across Dixie during the 1880’s, a topic of which will be discussed in further detail later in this essay. This virulent populism threatened the stranglehold the corrupt Bourbons held on the indigent Southern states and relegated country folk to the forgotten and unrepresented outskirts and wilderness. Furthermore, these conservative Bourbons utilized and took advantage of the Negro votes, concentrated in the wealthier and more densely populated Black Belt and Lowland counties, to crush the rural Caucasian vote in many parts of the Deep South, with Mississippi, South Carolina, and Louisiana being majority Negro. The planter-patrician paternalism of the antebellum period reappeared in order to win the Negro vote, whom the lowlanders were already socially intimate with, but this was done by these elites in a far more crafty and guileful manner. Mississippi, being the most Negro, also manifested the most unignorably uproarious and acrimonious of grassroots populist movements during the 1880’s. It was also in desperate need of constitutional, social, and economic reform after the overthrow of the Radical Republicans. It was simply impossible for populism to achieve political success without addressing the Negro Question. The outcry for a constitutional convention grew so loud that the Delta Bourbons could no longer ignore it, acquiescing by allowing for a convention. It cannot be stressed enough that the animosity with which the Bourbons viewed lower class Whites is incommunicable.

The 1890 Mississippi Constitution was the true de jure beginning of the Jim Crow era. It was the ratification of that constitution which introduced poll taxes and literacy tests to Dixieland. Between 1890 and 1908, during what came to be known as the next stage Mississippi Plan, the first stage being the end of the Reconstruction era, Southern states drafted and ratified new constitutions which adopted this practice. Unfortunately for the rural White folk, the Bourbons had written a silver lining into these constitutions. The poll taxes and literacy tests also disfranchised many Whites as well. The Bourbons believed they had won by giving the populists what they wanted while also stripping them of many votes. This was ultimately unsuccessful as the populist sentiments only continued to grow throughout the 1890’s, many seeing the sleight of hand for what it was. The fervor and desperation of the populist Whites led to the adoption of Democratic Party White primaries between 1896 and 1906, beginning with South Carolina. After this point, agrarian populism finally flourished across Dixie after decades of campaigning and struggle, leading to the rise of the most prodigious and superlative of statesmen such as Theodore Bilbo, James Vardaman, Eugene Talmadge, Huey Long Jr., Strom Thurmond, Allan Shivers, George Wallace, Richard Russell, and several others.

While the Mississippi Plan got the ball rolling on voting restrictions, segregation of public spaces developed separately. The details for this are a bit fuzzy, some even asserting that segregation was originally a Northern practice and was adopted wholesale by the South. Arguably the primary reason for the development of these social customs arose due to the influx of Nigras and rural and Upland Whites into Southern cities and towns; they already disliked attending school and church together anyhow. Some criers of the New South movement supported it. Before the 1890’s, the South actually had infamously well integrated urban areas that the North often made note of, and the lowland areas saw a remarkably intimate relationship culture between the races. Whatever the case may be, public segregation got its start on train cars in the 1880’s. This phenomenon continued to grow until the Louisiana Separate Car Act of 1890 was challenged by the mixed-race man Homer Plessy. Ultimately, his challenge was brought before the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled in the landmark Plessy v. Ferguson case which ruled public segregation constitutional and established the “separate but equal” precedent. Now solidified by the SCOTUS, segregationists doubled down and continued enacting legislation sell into the 20th Century. This precedent would be a defining pillar of Southern society until 1954 when the Supreme Court overturned its previous ruling on a whim with the Brown v. Board of Education ruling.

With Jim Crow and segregation addressed, it is clear that Dixieland was in the midst of a volatile social situation, its worst since Reconstruction and prior to the Civil Rights Era. As stated previously, there were a number of populist and economic movements which engulfed Dixie between 1877 and the Great War. While it goes without saying, the South was utterly decimated by the War Between the States. Every pillar and shibboleth of its antebellum civilization had been toppled by invasion and military occupation. Simply shedding the shackles of Republican dictatorship was not enough to revive Dixie; it only allowed for the process of rebuilding to occur. Unfortunately, the Redeemer Democrats, later referred to as the Bourbon Democrats, quickly fell into the same corruption and political shenanigans which characterized the Reconstruction Republicans.

In an era characterized by rural indigence and a desperation for political and social reforms, Southerners, especially the rural classes, did not take kindly to this sort of corruption from their own people. This ultimately gave rise to a number of populist movements throughout the 1880’s, 1890’s, and 1900’s. With the exception of excellent men such as Wade Hampton III of South Carolina and a handful of others, the state corruption reared its ugly head with widespread rampancy. Not long after seizing the reins of power, the Bourbons became notorious for the very same malfeasance and duplicity for which Southern voters sent the Republicans fleeing from the South, save for improved spending practices. Overall, their sentiments and policies were wholly uninterested in the lives of the country folk and seldom extended far beyond the densely populated Black Belt.

Generally, this ruling class exhibited the thoughts and behaviors of businessmen and lawyers and were often drawn from their ranks. Immediately following the Redemption, the Black Belt and lowland gentries formed various political machines and rings against poor rural Whites. The antebellum feuds between these classes simply resumed in the late 1870’s from their hiatus during the War and Reconstruction and marked “Solid” South politics until the Civil Rights Era. Even to the exclusion of the insurmountable Negro Question, numerous economic issues provided plenty of weight to the axe which clove Southerners in two. Taxes, interest rates, crop lien laws, the convict-lease system, sharecropping, public school funding, fertilizer inspections, land sales, and railroad expansions all defined the multitude of economic and financial problems with which Dixians bitterly debated and fought each other, spurred on by the uncaring, condescending, and even malicious attitude with which the Bourbons viewed to common Caucasian populace in the Southland the former ruled. These issues and the horrendous state of social life quickly gave rise to the Farmer’s Alliance and agrarian populist movements which dominated the faction rivalries in the Southern Democratic Party during the late 1870’s and 1880’s.

Compounded with these absurd political pursuits, Southern social life was rewritten by the War and Reconstruction. By the close of the 1870’s, Dixie faced a new world and method of living which gave rise to a number of movements and socio-political changes. Financially, Southerners languished in an extreme state of poverty that a 21st Century mind cannot fathom. It was pure indigence, nothing less. This demographic of folks never fully embraced the New South way of thinking, and generally for understandable reasons. The New South had abandoned them and was the way of the businessman, politicians, and middle-class city folk. The era was dominated by a middle-class and business-class of upstarts, arrivistes, and parvenus all wholly at the expense of the poor country folk. As time progressed during the 1880’s, the aforementioned New South adopters were desperately pushing for Yankee investment. They and the banks and corporations sold off everything not bolted down which led to the wholesale and complete ravaging of land in a move which was comparable to that of a strip-mining operation. While railroads were built all across the South, they and the steel industry could never truly flourish because of the discriminatory freight rates enforced by the North and Washington DC.

From these circumstances, grassroots reactionary political and cultural movements arose in opposition. Regarding politics, this manifested as the previously mentioned populist movements. While there were many, the foremost within the South was the Farmer’s Alliance. The Southern Farmer’s Alliance originated in Lampasas County, Texas in 1875 as a means of cooperation between small frontier farmers but also as a way of combatting abuses from large cattle operations, land speculators, cattle kings, and foreign-owned land syndicates. This early organization was tumultuous and frequently split into factions, even ceasing to exist altogether in 1878 but was revived the following year. The Texas Farmer’s Alliance would experience a resurgence in 1886 upon the rise of Dr. Charles Macune through its ranks. Unifying its factions and preventing a split, Macune brokered a merging of the Texas Alliance and the Louisiana Farmer’s Union and renaming the organization the National Farmers’ Alliance and Cooperative Union. This allowed it to further expand into Dixie and advocated for the abolition of national banks and monopolies, free coinage of silver, issuance of paper money, loans on land, establishment of sub-treasuries, income tax acts, and revision of tariffs. The Farmer’s Alliance was not an all encompassing machine of populism within the South, nor did it combat everything poor rural Whites opposed. However, it did successfully get the wheels turning on the succeeding populism of the 1890’s. The Farmer’s Alliance achieved little by its end in 1890, but its impact was magnanimous.

In 1890, fortunes began favoring the populists. While the previously touched on Mississippi Plan in the 1890’s and its legislative proponents did serve the lower classes in their demands to remove the Negro bloc from the controlling whims of the Bourbons and ratify needed improved state constitutions, the means through which voting reforms were accomplished, poll taxes and property requirements, served to disfranchise many Caucasians anyway, negating the desired outcome for the general populace.

Though the 1890’s experienced a resurgence in populism in the South heavily due in part to the Mississippi Plan opening up the façade of its political viability, the Populist Party itself collapsed completely following the presidential election of 1896. That was only one large drop within a sea of populist movements, and many who belonged to that failed party simply moved into the Democratic Party in the South. Nationally and especially below the Mason-Dixon Line, populism and progressivism was saved by the adoption of the direct primaries as a replacement to party conventions, much to the chagrin of state political leadership. For one cause or another, Southern leadership caved to the demands for such. The adoption of the White primaries began in South Carolina in 1896, legalized by the tenure of John Gary Evans, a protégé of former Governor then Senator Ben Tillman who continued Tillman’s agrarian populist policies and presided over the ratification of the South Carolina Constitution of 1896, and was followed by Arkansas in 1897, Georgia in 1898, Florida and Tennessee in 1901, Alabama and Mississippi in 1902, Kentucky and Texas in 1905, Louisiana in 1906, Oklahoma in 1907, Virginia in 1913, and North Carolina in 1915. The age of the populists’ success finally arrived. It was no coincidence that it correlatively rose with the birth of the Jim Crow era and was tied directly to Jim Crowism in 1890 and 1896.

Naturally, these legal reforms gave rise to, or were a direct result of, a slew of reform governors. James Vardaman and Theodore Bilbo of Mississippi, Thomas Campbell and Samuel Lanham of Texas, Charles Aycock of North Carolina, Hoke Smith of Georgia, Jeff Davis of Arkansas, Gary Evans and Cole Blease of South Carolina, and William Goebel of Kentucky were only a handful of the more notable reformers, often champions of segregationism. Jim Hogg was the early 1890’s precursor and influence of Thomas Campbell and Samuel Lanham, and Tillman was a direct influence over that of Gary Evans and Cole Blease.

These governors strove to reform Southern lawfare, combat political corruption, disrupt and weaken state political machines, and improve the lives of farmers and industrial workers. The railroads and their benefactors were arguably the primary opponent of these reformers, and it was not long before they started cracking down on the industry, one of the most popular means of which was railroad commissions. Railroads had themselves to blame due to their habits of discrimination, rebates, stock manipulation, favoritism, and overcharging; additionally, they would blatantly discriminate against states which passed laws or had railroad commissions they did not approve of, such as Texas and Georgia. Uniquely, anti-monopolization of the big oil companies in Texas was a major part of the movement there. Even insurance companies made it into the crosshairs for a time. Other strides were made to better fund public education and end child labor laws as well as the convict-lease system. One of the most successful members of this breed of governor was the uproarious Bilbo, who accomplished the creation of a state tax commission and the equalization of tax assessments, a board of bank examiners, a highway commission, a pardoning board, a tuberculosis hospital, a charity hospital, a training school for the unruly, a compulsory school-attendance law, a Blue Sky law, a stringent anti-lobby law, equalization of school fund distribution, adult night classes, and the most sizeable appropriation for education the state had seen at the time. Ultimately, these movements achieved a goodly amount of success compared to previous efforts, but populism eventually began falling out of vogue during the Great War and devolved largely into campaigns of racialism. Southern populism reared its mighty and acrimonious head again in 1954 following the Brown v Board of Education ruling as a means of massive resistance to forced integration at the point of bayonet. Fortunately, old-school agrarian populism finally made some much needed reforms to Southern society before it dissipated and World War I brought the New South era to a close.

Culturally, Southern Whites further developed their sense of identity while Christian revivalism surged. While a cosmopolitan call for progress and Yankeefication did occur from the late 1870’s to the turn of the century alongside a major push for industrialization, the average Southerner rejected the idea. Dixie became engulfed in the nostalgic mindset of Lost Cause historiography, grace and gallantry, veterans’ reunions, genealogy, and literature. The macabre brutality and poverty of invasion and Reconstruction served as a unifying force for Southern identity and breathed life into the people’s resolve and culture. Country life still clung to many of the customs of the antebellum period and the Old Order, of which the previously mentioned belonged. Industrialization failed to take root, and Southerners remained mostly rural until after World War II, lend further weight and longevity to these old ways and customs.

Christianity continued to spread ravenously across Dixieland. While Christendom’s spread was nothing new to the South due to the 2nd Great Awakening and the Confederate Army revivals, this new wave of Christian zeal carried with it an unforeseen zeal in the region; compounding generations of hard times drew folks closer to God and made them more willing to receive Christ. By the 1880’s, Baptists and Methodists were the leading denominations across the South, having overtaken the previously dominant Presbyterians and Episcopalians. The fervid Protestantism of the time tended to openly oppose the progressivism of the New South mantra and became positively symbiotic with the Lost Cause and Southern identity, deepening the rift between Northern and Southern denominations. Reverend Robert Lewis Dabney himself even brazenly spoke out against the new age in an address titled “The New South.” This facet of Southern culture became a mainstay of its history and social customs even into the 21st Century and was a monumental pillar in preserving its uniqueness among the various nations of the world.

However, not every aspect of late 19th Century culture was positive. Violence pervaded and grew with intensity during the New South era. The long-established culture of violence in the South grew so wanton that even historian C. Vann Woodward claimed, “The South seems to have been one of the most violent communities in comparable size in all Christendom.” Education, as well as the arts and sciences, were woefully lacking, and few general improvements were made for rural folk until populism finally succeeded at the turn of the century. Bleakness was a mainstay of life.

A densely packed and tempestuous period within Southern history all but wholly forgotten by 21st Century America, it is difficult to summarize within the span of a single essay. This dismal, violent period did fortunately come to a close in 1913, but the next stage of American society did not heal Dixie’s wounds. While Woodrow Wilson did reintroduce the South to the national stage for the first time since 1865, the emergence did not bring to the South the prosperity and peace many within it desired. However, the darkness of the New South period and its beginnings did succeed in establish a stringent social order and flourishing of Christianity which it so desperately needed. This period, though grim, was an integral part of Southern identity and much more within it occurred than simply the passage of Jim Crow laws, necessitating its preservation and study.

Bibliography:

Kirwan, Albert D. Revolt of the Rednecks: Mississippi Politics 1876-1925. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky, 1951.

Morgan, Chester M. Redneck Liberal: Theodore G. Bilbo and the New Deal. Louisiana State University Press, 1985.

Percy, William Alexander. Lanterns on the Levee: Recollections of a Planter’s Son. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 2006.

Trotter, Jack. “The Strange Career of Segregation.” Abbeville Institute. Last modified April 1, 2020. Accessed January 30, 2022. https://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/the-strange-career-of-segregation/.

Woodward, C. Vann. Origins of the New South: 1877-1913. Edited by Charles B. Dew, Wendell Holmes Stephenson, and E. Merton Coulter. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1971.

Woodward, C. Vann, and William S. McFeely. The Strange Career of Jim Crow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Other essays of mine regarding these topics:

On the Birth of Jim Crow

A Defense of Jim Crow and the South

The Final Moments of Jeffersonian Democracy: The Rise and Fall of Agrarian Populism in the Late 19th Century

The post The “Old” New South and the Early Jim Crow Era: 1877 – 1913 appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The demonic act of pederasty was not all-encompassing among the Ancient Greeks, as some might proclaim.

There were quite a few noteworthy detractors (only to name a few):

We don’t know the exact percentage of those involved in sodomy, pederasty, and similar acts, but it’s almost certainly embellished to an extraordinary degree by modernists who desire to make it seem as a normal cultural custom of the time to degrade the ancients and justify their own depravity.

It happened, just like it happens today, but is in no way an indication of a natural proclivity to the act. It is as far from the natural order as possible. As Plato said, it is “contrary to nature”.

Even worse, our modern pedophiles appeal to these practices in Ancient Greece as a justification for their reprobate actions today. This, even though the acts were usually localized to a specific place and social class (usually elites, unsurprisingly), also during a specific time period. They act like all of these city-states were monolithic and unchanging. The Greeks had hundreds of city-states over vast periods of time, not all were alike. Some were Moloch driven, some were not.

Modern reprobates also try to link ancient pederasty to modern pedophilia. You can find an example of this on the NAMBLA page where they discuss pederasty, which I do not recommend reading unless you are in a satisfactory position to be enraged and break things. Another is in a TEDx talk that has been watched nearly a million times. This approach is deceitful. Even given the horrible nature of historical pederasty, the ancients still met an age of consent, which would have been teens (at least 16) and beyond puberty. Still far too young, and any homosexuality regardless of age is contrary to nature, but the modern pedophiles try to deceitfully use this practice as a justification for sexual attraction to children. The ancients never fetishized pre-pubescent boys like the modern reprobate would have us believe.

The ancients were no more or less pedophiles than other time periods. Neither were they more or less homosexual or other forms of sexual depravity.

Their city-states follow our own cycle. During certain degenerative periods, the ancients were more proud and tolerant of this sexual degeneration. Much similar to our own time today. Unsurprisingly, for the Greeks, the amount of pederasty almost always corresponded with the decline of each city-state. The closer it got to decline, the more of it was permitted and allowed.

And throughout the entire timeline of civilization—no matter the stage of the cycle—there were always dissidents that resisted it. As the above image demonstrates.

Be like them.

The post Historical Pederasty: Not Universal appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Earlier this month, Dr. Clyde Wilson had an article published on Identity Dixie and made the claim that the real adversaries of an independent Dixie are neither Africans nor Semites, but rather American Nationalists, White or other complexions. While (almost) everyone here can agree that the South chafes and suffers under the thumb of the Global American Empire, there can be no mistake about the subtext of Dr. Wilson’s message.

The term American Nationalist, which in some cases applies to those who advocate for a more authoritarian rightwing government and revitalizing the American Union, can also be applied to Southern Nationalists. We are Americans of the Southern states who demand a separate political entity from Washington – one that is predominately (if not homogeneously) White as the Founding Fathers intended.

Dr. Wilson complains of a general sense of White Nationalism, that it is rootless and “merely a Yankee ideology,” and those that embrace it are no different than the cartoonishly-evil, goose-stepping Germans who – for no reason whatsoever – decided to apply political force on Jews and leftists over eighty years ago. With all due respect to him and considering the current dismal status of the South, the United States, and Europe, I must ask: how is your tone-deaf assessment of White Nationalism (or the Southern Dissident Right, in general) any different than a shallow rebuke found in National Review?

It has long been an established truth that the Founding Fathers of this country – Yankee and Dixian – were, even as a modern term, “White Nationalists.” We can clearly see this in the text of the Naturalization Act of 1790, where American citizenship was limited to “free white person(s)… of good character.” The Founders understood the dangers of diversity, even when the political term did not exist, and the futility of giving citizenship to Africans, free and enslaved. To expect such a backward people to hold the same voting rights as Whites is as laughable as it is insane, especially now when we can see the abysmal state of affairs in countries like Haiti and South Africa. Or, in the South, we can look to North Charleston, Newport News, Baltimore, or Birmingham. You cannot maintain first world amenities, public infrastructure, and political systems with a race whose average IQ is two standard deviations below ours.

If that wasn’t enough, the historical and political illiteracy does not stop there. Dr. Wilson follows up with this incredible claim:

“Some few Americans after World War II began to praise the Nazi regime for its opposition to the rise of communism and internal disorder. This was and is stupid but characterizes some of the Alt-Right these days.”

Uh, yeah. Yes. That’s exactly what happened. With the Great War winding down, communist revolutionaries in Germany, seeking to emulate the horrors of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, attempted a coup throughout the entire country (and even briefly succeeded in regions like Bavaria). Luckily, veterans of the German army arrived and liquidated them, but the communists still remained in the political sphere in dangerously high numbers. Combined with reparations, liberalism, degeneracy, and hyperinflation (most of which was spurred on by Jews), Germany was in a state of complete disorder until Hitler came around and righted the ship. All this is a basic historical fact, and I don’t know why anyone on the Right would oppose nationalists from saving their country from bloodthirsty communists.

However, what gets me (and you, ID readers, when I make the comparison) the most is Dr. Wilson’s assertion that Hitler was anything but a patriot, and that his actions alone led to the deaths of millions of White people. Because he fought back against the people who had robbed his country of its territory, wealth, pride, and lost, his efforts were pointless and should be mocked with derision? By Dr. Wilson’s flawed logic, it was not Lincoln, the radical Republicans, or the abolitionists who destroyed Dixie – oh no, it was actually those incompetent losers like Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee, and Nathan Bedford Forrest who lost us our rights and independence. What sense does that make?

The politics and culture of today demands a complete renewal of what we, Southern Nationalists, believe in and stand for. Our current existential struggle goes far beyond milquetoast arguments about tax rates, nostalgic conservatism, or bickering over the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution – we are in the fight for our very way of life. Never before have the stakes been so high. In the 1860s, our ancestors fought a war to preserve political independence from the Yankees, we now have the heavy duty of saving our genetic and cultural legacy. If we fail here, there will be no Southerners left. It is our mission to secure a future for us and our posterity, and to identify those who would seek to do us harm. As a younger Southern Nationalist, my enemies are not White Nationalists. White Nationalists did not (1) tear down our statues, (2) devalue our currency, (3) flood our country with millions of illegals, (4) groom our children into transvestites, (5) send our men and women to die in the Middle East for 20 years, (6) institute no-fault divorce, (7) ban Christian prayer in public spaces, (8) and implement usury.

The world we live in now is not 1945, or even 1985. We have a Left that is hellbent on eradicating Southern culture, Christianity, traditional families and values, and openly advocates for abolishing “Whiteness.” They want to culturally, and actually, genocide us. The post-1945 “Nazis Evil Ad Infinitum” mythos, relentlessly hammered into the heads of the Boomer generation, wears pretty thin when transexuals are invited to the White House and the prevailing American culture encourages boys to get castrated, girls on puberty blockers, mocks God, and hates White people with a passion. And, any opposition to this Satanic agenda gets one labeled a “Nazi.” You don’t need to read through tea leaves to figure this one out, the writing is on the wall.

The question, then, becomes: did the “good guys” really win World War II? For young Southern Nationalists, White Nationalists, and the Dissident Right, we definitely know the answer.

-By Dixie Anon

The post A Young Southern Nationalist Reproach appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’m not really sure what to think about the style of the Tesla Cybertruck, although I’d rather get myself an F-150. I’ve ridden in Tesla sedans, and I just didn’t feel safe. There’s basically only a tablet on the dashboard that operates the whole thing, so it’s not very tactile. That seems like a serious choke point if it malfunctions, as these things often do. There’s also the issue of the weather getting cold enough to kill the battery, which sets you back by about 30 grand.

TESLA RECALL: Tesla is recalling nearly 4,000 MY 2024 Cybertrucks due to faulty accelerator pedals that may be dislodged when high force is applied. https://t.co/c5LVuZknRS pic.twitter.com/tNiipMxyT2

— CBS Evening News (@CBSEveningNews) April 19, 2024

Tesla seems to be in keeping with the latest American manufacturing trend of making faulty shit that could lead to disaster, Boeing can’t have all the fun. The thing with this “green energy” stuff though, is that it’s retarded. It’s not if you’re making money off of it, I know plenty of guys making the big bucks installing offshore wind turbines and designing solar panels. So, I can understand why they’re enthusiastic about this industry. We’ve all got to make a living.

The concept though, is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard. Scientifically, it’s unsound and when considered through some basic math, it becomes utterly preposterous. First, there’s the notion that we can convert all vehicles to EVs using the current battery technology, which is impossible even from a material perspective. Second, the idea that the power grid could handle it without being built out at a cost somewhere in the hundreds of billions. Third, the notion that all of the electricity generated from conventional sources could be replaced with the green energy sham really blows the mind and, of course, there’s no such thing as green energy.

On Earth Day, President Biden is announcing $7 billion in awards to help deliver solar power to over 900,000 households in low-income and disadvantaged communities across the country – giving Americans more breathing room and cleaner breathing room. pic.twitter.com/BwtzBNoQxS

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) April 22, 2024

Blacks aren’t going to appreciate the solar panel concept. Just give ’em dat EBT. For instance, solar panels require the mining and melting of pure quartz and the blades on wind turbines are made from fiberglass which can’t be recycled and ends up contaminating groundwater in landfills. Both have operational lifespans shorter than a conventional power plant, assuming that inclement weather doesn’t take them out. They also require enormous amounts of conventional fuels to produce and install. These are just a few salient issues a rational individual should be able to take into account.

There’s nothing about either method which is better for the environment than nuclear or hydroelectric power. In fact, the energy return on investment (EROI) for both is basically lower than any other form of generating electricity, and this electricity can only be generated when the wind is blowing, or the sun is shining. It’s so totally stupid.

The “fossil fuel” concept was introduced by the same people at the same time as global warming. It’s true that coal is the accretion of organic material transformed by heat and pressure. Coal is solid and thus never migrates from its point of deposition. The really good stuff, anthracite, is formed by compression on the sides of mountains. We’re running out of that, but there’s sufficient bituminous coal for centuries of consumption at current rates.

Oil and gas are where serious questions arise. Some is certainly the result of ancient organic matter, for instance what’s being fracked in the United States. However, the chemical characteristics vary a great deal depending on where it’s extracted. The potential is also high for the abiotic generation of hydrocarbons. Deposits are observable in the solar system, and the settled science doesn’t have a good method of observing what happens at the depths, pressure, and temperatures where these hydrocarbons could potentially be formed.

This is anathema to the settled science of fossil fuels, so only entities like Russia pursue research into this matter. They’ve had success drilling through igneous formations where hydrocarbons shouldn’t be present if they were formed from organic matter. Certainly, there are problematic issues from hydrocarbons but the question of whether or not we will run out might not be the most salient.

The anti-carbon thing is where it seems to get outright Satanic. Every living thing on this planet is made out of carbon. It’s not some toxic substance heating up the atmosphere, this is very basic chemistry. To be anti-carbon is to be against life itself. The “global warming” canard was introduced by the Club of Rome roughly 50 years ago. This then turned into “climate change” because any weather condition could be cited as proof since the globe didn’t warm.

The concept was about controlling population growth, if even that’s to be believed. My suspicion is that the motives are far more sinister. It’s murky, but there were Rothschilds and all the usual suspects behind this right from the start. Global warming wasn’t discovered by researchers and then evolved into a scientific consensus. The bogus science came after the concept.

Today from Truckee to Texas, communities are coming face-to-face with the devastating impacts of the climate crisis. 100mph winds and 12’ of snow are battering the Sierra Nevada while crews battle the largest wildfire in Texas history. We owe it to our our communities, neighbors,…

— Al Gore (@algore) March 2, 2024

Anytime you don’t like the weather, this is called Climate Change. Originally, his tune was that we’d all have drowned by now because the ice caps were melting. In the very least, this is some sort of PSYOP to drive anyone capable of performing the most limited critical thinking insane. The fact that every single respectable person in our society endorses this nonsense is probably a key feature of this campaign to undermine our sanity. They fly in private jets to events where they congratulate themselves, talk about the pernicious effects of carbon, and why the rest of us shouldn’t be allowed to eat a hamburger. It’s ludicrous.

I attended one of these WEF-type conferences. There were government ministers, and representatives of various companies who flew in from all over the world. I was there to scout for business basically, not because I care about the carbon. Beef was on the menu, the food was fabulous, and in the evenings there were delightful cocktail parties. I didn’t need to pay for anything the entire time. If I’d been paying for it at nice restaurants, everything I swilled and chowed down on would’ve cost hundreds of dollars. I also got lots of free shit. These climate people aren’t forgoing a single personal luxury out of concern for carbon.

For one of the sessions I attended, they had a presentation by some drug-addled natives whom (they claim) were cleaned up from their habits through a grant for millions of dollars to bury plants in order to prevent carbon from entering the atmosphere. Bill Gates is planning to spend massive sums cutting down trees in order to bury them, so it was par for the course.

Bill Gates and other investors are betting Kodama Systems can reduce carbon dioxide in the air by chopping down and burying trees. Now if only Uncle Sam would get on board with tax credits, too. https://t.co/MLWM3z1NBN pic.twitter.com/LT47qxQLII

— Forbes (@Forbes) August 24, 2023

At another, a CEO on a panel said that flying economy class was not a way to fight climate change. I wanted to keel over laughing and shout “hahaha, you fuckin’ retards!” but I simply took some photos and texted about it to some members of the Identity Dixie crew because you literally can’t make this up. It’s that nonsensical. Still, I had a blast. It’s fun to go to things like this and drink cocktails while you’re treated like you’re important. That’s probably part of it as well.

Obviously, I never brought up my actual views. This would get me ostracized and it’s bad for business. Proper white people have a sort of defense mechanism where if you bring up something inappropriate, they simply shut off and walk away. When you contradict the settled science, you’re not someone who should be part of the discussion so they won’t talk with a cretin such as yourself. I might’ve been the only person there engaging in the slightest introspection about this nonsense.

Extreme weather and misinformation

– are perceived to be the most severe global risks, according to a new report by @WEF.

In an age of interconnected challenges, global cooperation is our only way forward.
#ParisAgreement | #ClimateAction

— UN Climate Change (@UNFCCC) January 10, 2024

Proper white people also perform logical and emotional alchemy to make something ridiculous true to themselves if this has been marketed to them as the thing that moral and sophisticated people understand. Clearly, whoever formulated these green energy, climate change, and fossil fuel canards understood this phenomenon. This is why they’ve been imposed so successfully.

Thus, proper white people possess an immunity to the truth that can’t be confronted with facts and logic. If you think that sounds fantastical, well look at all of the proper white people who got the COVID injections and swear by climate change. It’s the same thing with their inability to come to an objective understanding of morality, and why most of them are atheists who can’t understand how they’re being utilized in a struggle between good and evil.

If you can’t gently disabuse proper white people of their dangerous and misguided status beliefs through the provision of truth, the implications are rather disquieting. The demonstrable fact that they can be manipulated to adopt any belief through the proper marketing technique doesn’t fill one with much hope, either.

However, this does explain why they just keep doubling down on the climate hoax, claiming every single adverse weather event is proof of why ever more draconian restrictions must be placed on the population. In Western Europe, farms are being forcibly shutdown by governments and suicides among farmers have risen sharply as a result. Farming might’ve been their family’s livelihood and lifestyle for millennia, food is in high demand, and yet this has to come to an end over gases. It’s just plain evil.

In the Netherlands, Dutch farmers have taken to the streets to protest the government's decision to shut down 3,000 farms to cut nitrogen emissions. GREEN MADNESS. Take a look:pic.twitter.com/Tphaq676BD

— Steve Hanke (@steve_hanke) December 11, 2022

For example, in Ireland, which is not a big place, the government is going to spend 600 million euros culling 10% of the nation’s cattle. This could be decried as more climate stupidity, but it seems like a deliberate attempt to create a food crisis, which is being done at the same time that Europe is being flooded with unrelenting mass migration. Something insidious is unfolding, although it might be impossible to discern some sort of rational agenda out of it.

Confronting climate change is a mandated collapse of global civilization. It’s often speculated that the elites want to get rid of the rest of us, but that doesn’t make much sense because the value of their assets would collapse, along with the labor force and global supply chain that sustains them. This is why I’m leaning towards it all being some sort of Satanic plot.

Unfortunately, there’s no way to make sense out of what we’re being subjected to these days besides Satanism. It’s been asserted often in the alternative media that climate change is about justifying greater draconian control over our lives. If it’s about control, how does a government control a society where the economy has collapsed over climate restrictions and people are starving? It’s much easier to for someone who has enough decent food to eat to be complacent or someone with a job he’s worried about losing to avoid political agitation.

Cobalt mining for Big Tech is driving child labor, deaths in the Congo

Child labor, sexual assault, birth defects, abject poverty, workers buried alive: A new exposé on artisanal cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo lifts the curtain on a nightmarish world… pic.twitter.com/GBKzZb5AGl

— African Hub (@AfricanHub_) April 16, 2024

This is true about probably anything that happens in Africa, but still.This isn’t about helping the environment, either. Hydrocarbons have their issues but it’s far less destructive to drill underneath the environment to extract them than to tear it up for toxic battery materials. Large bird species with fragile populations don’t die flying into oil rigs like what happens with these turbines. Some solar plants cause birds to burst into flames. Simply extracting the hydrocarbons to use for energy is much more efficient than using them to produce fake green energy. There’s no way to make any sense out of it from this angle.

If a proper white people were reading this article, they wouldn’t get any further than the first paragraph where I deride the concept of green energy. If they managed to get to the Satanism part, that’s where they’d receive the sweet confirmation bias of me being a nutjob spouting crackpot theories. So, I think it’s safe to say there isn’t going to be any recalibration towards reason on these matters. That’s probably not going to be very fun for any of us. I’m not saying we’re all doomed, but the trajectory looks to be rather unpleasant and we’re along for the ride.

The post I’m Exasperated with these Scams appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Republicans and CPAC clowns often try to rationalize their support for unlimited immigration and these United States’ lack of border security by claiming that we need the economic migrants invading North America to replace our declining population. However, they never attempt to explain why we would need or even want to maintain the current population numbers. Most Americans would be better off if there were fewer peoples inhabiting these lands. In fact, the standard of living was much higher, and workers were more productive when the population was smaller. The younger generations of Y and Z are the first Americans to experience lower standards of living than their parents on average. This can easily be attributed to a simple matter of reduced supply due to increased demand driven by foreign-born aliens.

In 1940, the population of these United States was only about 135 million people and the great majority of them were of European descent. These Americans proved to be incredibly productive in building most of the ships, planes, tanks, trucks, and weaponry used with great success by the Allies during World War 2. Then, they built the interstate highways and much of the federal infrastructure, as well as the infrastructure of their home states during the 1950s. In 1960, the U.S. population was still only 180 million and the economy boomed. The U.S. led the Western world in manufacturing and the middle class experienced a high standard of living. Then came the immigration reforms such as the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 which allowed for third-world peoples to migrate to the U.S. en masse and become citizens. Civil rights reforms, such as the forced desegregation of states and counties combined with affirmative action quotas and welfare subsidies for blacks, greatly increased the cost of living and reduced the average quality of life for middle class Whites.

Democrats and Republicans alike try to reassure their constituents that the great demographic replacement of Heritage Americans is just an unfounded conspiracy theory. However, we have already seen the results of racial demographic replacement on a micro scale at the municipal level. Cities all across these United States have noticeably deteriorated as Whites have fled, and the numbers of blacks, Latinos, and Middle Eastern peoples have increased. Multicultural diversity always begets drastic increases in crime and reductions in living standards. If the migrants were really capable of enriching cultures, they would have developed and enriched their own cultures in their own homelands when they had the chance.

As more and more cities fall to the invading hordes of savage invaders, productivity is diminished, and the overall economy shrinks along with gross domestic product. Neither the blacks nor the invaders have shown any aptitude for building or even maintaining a civilization. All of which leads to insurmountable government debt and the inflation of currency, which in turn steals wealth and opportunities from the middle class. Slowly, the middle class is destroyed, and the masses share equally in poverty and misery while being subjugated by a small ruling class of rich globalists. These nefarious globalists are the ones driving the migration of third-world peoples to North America as part of a scheme by which international corporations lay their labor costs off on working class Americans. First corrupt congressmen pass bills granting generous subsidies to alien migrants. Then, non-governmental organizations set the migrants up with low paying jobs working for unscrupulous corporations whose lawyers aid the migrants to obtain U.S. citizenship. Ultimately, Heritage Americans are stuck with the costs of providing food, shelter, transportation, education, and medical care for the aliens.

Today, accounting for an estimated 30 million illegal aliens, the U.S. population has peaked at 360 million. That equals twice as many people as there were in 1960. Since that time, the Yankee Dollar has been inflated by more than 900%. That means that it will take more than $1,000 to buy the same amounts of goods or services today that someone could have bought for only $100 sixty years ago. The quality of today’s products is probably not even as good, either. At this rate, most young Americans will never be able to buy houses of their own. The prices of new vehicles and gasoline are also quickly becoming cost prohibitive. What’s even worse is that the cost of healthy food can be enough to put one into debt slavery these days as the U.S. government sends much of our wealth to foreign countries. Adding insult to injury, foreigners can then use our own money to buy our lands out from under our feet. All of these atrocities are multiplied exponentially by the infinite demand for our limited resources and supplies. Therefore, the best way to counter these negative trends and perhaps reverse the reduction in the quality of our lives is by working to reduce the outrageous demands made against us by the globalists and the other alien invaders.

The South has all of the resources we need to not only survive the coming collapse of the Yankee Empire, but to rebuild our civilization and thrive once we break free from Satan’s unholy Union. We have the best farmland, rivers, lakes, and coastal ports, as well as abundant energy sources such as natural gas and oil. Our climates are mild and accommodate year-round economic activity. Furthermore, our States are naturally protected by the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico along with the Appalachian and Smokey Mountain Ranges between us and the North. We just need the will to declare our independence and abandon the Yankees to die in their never-ending foreign wars of Zionist aggression. As was the case in 1861, we no longer have much to lose. However, unlike in 1861, we now have strong potential allies and trading partners in Russia, China, Brazil, and India.

Deo Vindice

-By John S.

The post Quantity versus Quality appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One common claim from White Nationalist Yankees is that the Union’s victory in the War of Northern Aggression ended up being a good thing for White Southerners as it helped prevent Dixie from becoming a large-scale Haiti. As the claim goes, Dixie alone would have eventually become majority black and, with that, would have become a ticking timebomb that sooner or later would have turned into a Haitian-style black revolution or a large-scale massacre of the White population. Additionally, it’s claimed the consolidation and reforming of the United States after the War ensured that the Union remained overwhelmingly White and thus the threat of a black revolution was mitigated.

It’s a fear that many White Southerners shared in the days leading up to the War. But many Southerners correctly saw that the radical Yankee abolitionists were increasing the chances of turning Dixie into an ill-fated Saint-Domingue. Remember, Haiti was the worst-case scenario, and the history of Haiti since has further shown this. Haiti was not a case of “slaves rising against their masters” as so many on the Left naively believe, but rather wholesale racial carnage. Both slaveholding and non-slaveholding Whites were killed, and the Haitian slaughter is a chief reason why Southern Whites, from the poorest farmer to the wealthiest aristocrat, held such a remarkable degree of unity. They knew that, as in Haiti, they would all be killed. But despite these claims, I do not think there was any real danger of Dixie becoming the next Haiti, the conditions between the two were simply too different, as I will outline below.

1. DemographicsModern White Nationalists who insist Dixie is demographically similar to Haiti are only superficially looking at the problem. At the eve of the Haitian Revolution, Haiti was over 90% black. By contrast, the South, although having a significantly higher black population than the North, was nothing like Haiti. It is true that two states – South Carolina and Mississippi – had majority black populations, but their White population was still comparable. The rest of Dixie was majority White and, in certain areas, like Appalachia, it was overwhelmingly White. Only a handful of Southern counties had comparable demographics to Haiti, and that made a large-scale Haitian Revolution style scenario in Dixie unlikely. The numbers were simply not there.

2. GeographyHaiti is on an island, and that means that miliary reinforcement as soon as the slaves took physical control of Haiti was always going to be extremely difficult. An amphibious landing is one of the most difficult miliary endeavors to successfully pull off. By contrast, Dixie, centered on a continent, would have been far easier for the White forces to defend.

3. PriorityAt the time of the Haitian Revolution, Haiti (or as it was once known, Saint-Domingue) was a French colony and France was involved in the Napoleonic Wars. It was not that Saint-Domingue was unimportant – Napoleon’s dream of a French Empire in North American was dependent upon it and the failure of the French to put down the rebellion is the primary reason France sold Louisianna to the United States; however, it was a side quest compared to the war in Europe. By contrast, had a slave revolt ever broken out in Dixie, it would have very quickly become the greatest priority for our nation, and that would have made it far more difficult for something like Haiti to take place.

4. DiseaseIt is also worth pointing out a key reason why the Haitian Revolution was successful – despite the massive disadvantages the French had in terms of population and geography, they were still on the cusp of victory when an outbreak of yellow fever decimated the French forces. Yellow fever is a tropical disease, meaning the French had no immunity to it, while the Haitians did. Because Dixie sits north of the tropics, yellow fever itself never could have become a factor. But there is also little realistic chance that any disease could have ravaged Dixie, killing the White population in droves while leaving the black population relatively unscathed. The two populations had simply lived in proximity for far too long for there to have a significant enough difference in the immune systems of the two populations to produce a Haiti-style scenario.

So, despite what certain White Nationalists claim, the Yankee army did not save us from becoming Haiti, the conditions were too great for that to happen. By understanding what happened in Haiti, Southerners can better understand that the Yankee army was in no way a force for good (either in the short or long term). It was a force of destruction. It is also why, despite claims to the contrary, a Free Dixie was viable.

The post Did the Union Prevent a Southern Haiti? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

For those of you who have yet to understand why the ruling class has determined that topics such as CRT, white guilt, and so on are necessary in elementary schools:

Imagine you’re a child in school—a white child—and every day you’re reminded of how evil you are because of your skin color. Now imagine that coincidentally, at the same time, you are told that LGBTQ+ are heroes that need to be celebrated, cherished, and loved above all others. As a white child, you begin to recognize that you can simply identify as LGBTQ+ and suddenly you’re no longer such an evil, original-sin laden person. Instead, you are now the hero. That is exactly what is happening.

The LGBT sexual cult is a tool to convince white children to abandon their people. It splinters that connection with kin who want to see them succeed and be raised correctly.

We teach these white children that they are either the horrible whitey or the disadvantaged, oppressed (but cherished, loved, and celebrated) sexual minority. Obviously, at such a susceptible young age, they will choose the one taught to them as the “good” guys. They don’t want to be hated and vilified. No child does.

There is a reason why whites and youths have high representation within the walls of the LGBT insanity cult. It’s because they are being targeted with it the most. For whites, they can escape their “white guilt” immediately upon inclusion. Those whites are now miraculously, with only a single phrase uttered, a minority that does not differ from the other minorites.

With just a few single words—”I’m now a woman” or “I’m gay and nonbinary”—They instantaneously morph into the oppressed heroes instead of the malicious villains. We all must stand and marvel at this supernatural transformation.

This does not just affect the children. Weak adults get caught up in it, too. The entire belief structure of an oppressed sexual minority class functions as a mechanism that teaches susceptible whites to run and hide (while simultaneously selling their soul). It’s an out for the weakest people to escape any type of persecution.

You no longer have to feel bad about being white, so long as you become a degenerate. A useful tool of the ruling class. This wasn’t done by accident. It’s yet another successful demoralization campaign by the demons in charge.

The result is the creation of an entire class of anti-white loons who are white. These people become some of the most sociopathic of all of our enemies, because they must constantly demonstrate their allegiance through further groveling to the other minority classes (to continually abase their own whiteness). A part of this prostration is the inevitable targeting and oppressing of other whites, so they themselves are not targeted or oppressed.

It’s sad when it happens to children who don’t know any better. The groomers force the children down a horrible path at a young age, with no choice given to them. Those who should be the protectors are the ones directly harming them. I feel for those children. But I don’t feel for the adults that pass it on to them, or the adults that get wrapped up in this. They are incredibly weak, depraved, or both.

So now, when you see graphs like these, you will know why:

It’s all a part of their plan to break us.

The post The Indoctrination of White Children appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One speech I shall never forget was delivered by Judge John H. Rogers. In it … he spoke as one who understood his subject, and he told the story of the struggles of the South and of its history clearly and truly, and yet without a word of hate or revenge. When he closed, a resolution was offered and adopted thanking him for the address, declaring it to be the most valuable historical document ever read before the association.

(Note to readers: Below is the concluding part – part VI of VI – of this series. As such, all six parts of “The South Vindicated,” Judge John H. Rogers’s 1903 oration at the Confederate Reunion in New Orleans, may be found archived in numerical order at my contributor pages, here. My epigraph above-posted was extracted from a reunion report, authored by Miss Bettina Ruth Bush, and published in the Marshall, MO Index newspaper shortly following her and her delegation’s return home from the reunion. Further to Miss Bush’s point in the final sentence of her above-quoted statements, the proprietor of the VETERAN later printed enough copies of the speech to send to every college that existed in the United States at that time. -TM)

“Sherman’s march to the sea, as told by himself, and Sheridan’s raid through the Valley of Virginia, as characterized by his own pen, find no counterpart in Lee’s march to Gettysburg or Antietam, or in Morgan’s raid through Ohio. No Confederate general ever recorded any boast of his cruelty to noncombatants, or felt a pride in making a Warsaw of any part of American soil. To emphasize these statements, I invoke your patience while I read an order issued by a man while in the enemy’s country, whom I believe to represent the highest type of genuine and true manhood to be found in all history:

HEADQUARTERS OF ARMY OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA, CHAMBERSBURG, PA, June 27, 1863.

The Commanding General has observed with marked satisfaction the conduct of the troops on the march, and confidently anticipates results commensurate with the high spirit they have manifested. No troops could have displayed greater fortitude or better performed the arduous marches of the past ten days. Their conduct in other respects has, with few exceptions, been in keeping with their character as soldiers, and entitled them to approbation and praise.

There have, however, been instances of forgetfulness on the part of some, that they have in keeping the yet unsullied reputation of the army, and that the duties exacted of us by civilization and Christianity are not less obligatory in the country of the enemy than our own. The Commanding General considers that no greater disgrace could befall the army, and through it the whole people, than the perpetration of the barbarous outrages upon the innocent and defenseless and the wanton destruction of private property that have marked the course of the enemy in our own country. Such proceedings not only disgrace the perpetrators and all connected with them, but are subversive of the discipline and efficiency of the army, and destructive of the ends of our present movements. It must be remembered that we make war only on armed men, and that we cannot take vengeance for the wrongs our people have suffered, without lowering ourselves in the eyes of all whose abhorrence has been excited by the atrocities of our enemy, and offending against Him to whom vengeance belongeth, without whose favor and support our efforts must all prove in vain.

The Commanding General, therefore, earnestly exhorts the troops to abstain with most scrupulous care from unnecessary or wanton injury to private property, and he enjoins upon all officers to arrest and bring to summary punishment all who shall in any way offend against the orders on the subject.

“Who could have written this order except Robert E. Lee? Years after the war had closed, at a time, it is true, when its passions had not subsided, and bitterness in the hearts of people of one section toward their countrymen in the other still lingered, in a spirit of splendid magnanimity, the victorious conqueror, the great Captain of the Union army, taught the grand lesson of forgiveness and fraternity in the imperishable words, ‘Let us have peace.’

“But this order of Gen. Lee was penned in the very midst of the furious struggle, when every heart was filled with resentment and indignation at the cruel outrages upon inno- cent and defenseless noncombatants and wanton and malicious destruction of private property, even the family portraits and heirlooms, and household effects essential to the comfort of the unprotected wives and children of the soldiers in the field.

“Contrast it with Sherman’s march to the sea and Sheridan’s raid in the Valley; with the wanton destruction by fire of the captured cities Atlanta, Columbia, Charleston; and finally with that order of that other Virginian, Hunter, by which the torch was applied even to the institutions of learning, and the building and library and apparatus, the accumulations of forty years of the Virginia Military Institute, and the library and apparatus of Washington College, endowed by the Father of His Country, perished in the angry flames; or contrast it with the conduct of Butler in New Orleans.

“In peace Grant gloriously triumphed over the passions engendered by war; but Lee, horrified by the heartless atrocities of the invading foe, in the midst of the enemy’s country, with every opportunity for revenge, triumphantly rose above all the natural instincts of the human heart for revenge, to inculcate and to practice the teachings of the Saviour of mankind, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay.’ Peerless, glorious Robert E. Lee! Glorious in prosperity – more glorious in adversity; glorious in victory – more glorious in defeat; resplendent in life – triumphant in death.

“What a monument is this to the character of the Southern army! One who followed Bragg through Kentucky could not have known by observation that an army had passed along the highway unless he had seen where it had camped at night, and not then because any fence had lost a rail or any orchard its fruit. Is there not something in the history of a people like that worth preserving? May no lessons here be drawn for the elevation of mankind; no memories worthy of the children of the South?

“We must not forget that a large number of the survivors of that conflict have taken up their abode in the Silent City, and those who remain are admonished that white heads are the companions of failing memories. Whatever they shall do by way of fixing the true status of the Confederate soldier must be done in the near future, for

To the past go more dead faces every year;
Everywhere the sad eyes meet us;
In the evening’s dust they greet us,
And to come to them entreat us, Every year.

May I be permitted to trespass a moment longer? It is of the Confederate soldiers in peace I would speak. I cannot – nor would I if I could – portray the ceaseless chain of wrong and oppression which followed in the wake of the great ‘Civil War,’ and it came upon a defenseless, desolated and impoverished land – a land rich in nothing but noble men and women and the precious memories of the glorious race from which they sprung and in the priceless heritage of high achievements.

If those who fell in battle could have spoken from their graves, they would scarcely have envied the fate of the survivors. Sir, if anything exceeds in constancy, in patience, in courage and fortitude, the Confederate soldier, who from 1863 to 1865, half-clad, hungry, and almost without hope of success, followed with weary but steady footsteps the tattered battle flags of the South until the star of the Confederacy went out, it was the same soldier who, for the decade that followed the war, in poverty and in want, disfranchised and despised, overrun by aliens and strangers, steadily and with a sublime constancy and devotion resisted wrong and oppression, turned his back upon place and power, while ignorance and dishonesty held high carnival, until, by the very logic of events, reason supplanted bitterness and passion, ignorance and vice gave way to intelligence and personal worth, and his long-deferred redemption came.

“Did any other people ever face and overcome adversity as did the Southern people? The same spirit which gave her armies unity, power, and endurance followed the survivors back to civil life to point the way to a new birth such as no other country has ever experienced. The South gave to her armies all of her male population, including beardless boys and gray-haired men, and they went from every walk, profession, and calling and station in life. Neither the bench, the pulpit, nor the institutions of learning were spared. All answered with alacrity and determination the call to arms.

“When it closed there were none upon whom to rely but the ex-Confederate soldier. He it was who took up the new problems which the changed conditions of his desolate land presented. Standing by the graves of his comrades, inspired by their noble deeds, chastened and disciplined by the horrors, self-denials, and sufferings of war, encouraged by the high achievements of his revolutionary sires, and loving to veneration the traditions of his ancestry, interwoven as they were with the history of his beloved South, undismayed but hampered by the prejudices and passions which war had left behind, he began the work of rebuilding her shattered fortunes and rehabilitating her dismantled commonwealths.

“But as the South had fought for the principle of local self-government and failed, so in the disjointed logic of the times she was to be denied its application in the re-establishment of her State governments. The South, yet unadjusted to its changed conditions, struggling under its burdens of misfortune and impending dangers, misjudged, misunderstood, and mistrusted, may have blundered in many things; and the great North, forgetting or ignoring the great qualities – the fidelity and honor, the genius for constructive statesmanship and good government which her fallen foe had always exhibited in war and in peace – gave rein to unrestricted passions and prejudices, alike harmful to itself and ruinous to the South.

“It sent the carpetbagger, who, aided by those who had never exercised the simplest rights of citizenship, were expected to set up and administer such governments as were fit for a people who, for nearly three-quarters of a century, had, in the main, guided and directed the splendid progress and development of the great republic.

“I would not dwell, if time permitted, upon the riotous conditions into which a helpless and defenseless people were plunged by this characterless horde of insatiable cormorants who assembled at our State capitols, to blaspheme the very name of civil government, and plot schemes to oppress a fallen foe, that they might prolong their opportunities for peculation. This is not the time nor place, but it must be left to the future historian, in the interest of truth and as a lesson to posterity, and as a warning to us all that there is no freedom where one man is permitted to govern others against their wills, to drag away the sheet that covers the rotten corpse of reconstruction. It fell, as in the nature of things it could not endure.

“Time gradually assuaged the passions of the war; commerce and business struggled under its withering influences and demanded better things; and the conscience of the great victorious North was stricken at the cruelties and follies and ruin it wrought; but a decade had passed, a weary, withering, blighting decade of misrule on the one hand, and patient endurance and long-deferred hope on the other. Again the ex-Confederate took up the burden of civil government.

“I think sometimes we forget the strong characters of those who, Moseslike, led us out of the wilderness of our woes. Few of them are now left, and their faces recede with the flying years. They were ex-Confederates, true and tried. Some yet live, and to call names would be invidious; but we owe them a double debt of gratitude, and to their memories reverence and love.

“With the South’s overwhelming problem still unsolved, she has nevertheless, under the auspices of her own people, fallen upon safe and peaceful, if not happy and prosperous, times. Her sons and daughters have resumed their rightful station, and whatever the future has in store of good for her must rest upon the traits and characteristics of her people. She will be patient; she will be prudent. To all the knightly and queenly virtues she will hold fast, trusting in God and the future for the noble and good. The South will not despair.

“I read the other day in one of Talmage’s sermons these words:

There is a flower in Siberia that blooms only in January, the severest month in that cold climate. It is a star-shaped flower, and covered with glistening specks that look like diamonds. A Russian took some of the seeds of that flower to St. Petersburg and planted them, and they grew, and on the coldest day of January they pushed back the snow and ice and burst into full bloom. They called it the snow flower; and it makes me think of those whom the world tries to freeze out and snow under, but who, in the strength of God, push through and up and out and bloom in the hardest weather of the world’s cold treatment, starred and radiant with a beauty given only to those who find life a struggle and turn it into victory.

“These sturdy, venerable veterans, bearing the scars and wounds of battle in their bitterest days, like the snow flowers of Siberia, pushed their way up and out and through all the ice and snows of the cold winters of adversity, and, thank God! they stand for all that is strong and conservative and safe in government. Will their posterity do less? Providence, as a kind Father, took by the hand our liberty-loving ancestors and guided them here. Generation after generation lived, ruled, and passed away, retaining the purity and freshness of virtuous power. Greed of gain and lust of power, culminating in plutocratic usurpation of all the branches of government, have never found favor or encouragement here. Our population, Anglo-Saxon still, has never been dominated by foreign elements ignorant and careless of the principles of our government and the practices of our fathers. We still have our splendid inheritance, except as modified – let us believe for the better – by war.

“I believe, as I live, that if our institutions are to be preserved, much – so much! – will depend upon this goodly South of ours. Our deepest concern should be for a better and more righteous national character. All the bounteous elements of earth and sky beckon us away from the base fascination of pelf which dishonors and destroys our country. Let us invite all her people into paths of law and order, inculcating peace, and keep alive our sense of justice and human freedom, and let all our advancement and growth be characterized by such a recognition of the rights of man as shall make her people feel that the blessings of Providence are theirs under a government of just and equal laws.

“May our beloved Southland build all her temples, not upon the shifting quicksands of selfish expediency, but upon the everlasting principles of right! Let us not forget that, in the great armory of Divine Providence, Justice forges her weapons long before her battles are fought; that in the everlasting courts of heaven every man must suffer the penalties of his disobedience, and all nations the penalty of injustice and wrong.

“Whatever may be our burdens or calamities, let us bear them with that courage and fortitude that becomes a just and a great people; and may our children and our children’s children be inspired to walk along the very mountain ranges of an enlightened Christian civilization, always in the path of duty, and preserve and keep sacred the same great qualities that made their ancestry respected and beloved of mankind!

End of speech

The post Confederate History Month, 2024, Part VI – Conclusion appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’m not an advocate of setting oneself on fire. As a practical matter, it proffers little utility. Moreover, the way things are going, in terms of your untimely demise, America probably has that one taken care of. The fun part is you don’t get to know when or how your ticket is getting punched.

That being said, I’m quite surprised more Americans aren’t setting themselves on fire. I’m not sure if this is a testament to American complacency or a form of grim resilience, but the vast majority of us haven’t set ourselves on fire and probably never will.

Max Azzarello, the man who set himself on fire outside the Trump trial today, sounds exactly as you'd imagine. pic.twitter.com/X7ROU9iI0E

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) April 19, 2024

This doomed country is a grab bag of things to drive someone insane. The nutjob who set himself on fire outside the Trump trial raised some good points. For instance, that the government is a puppet show to cover for criminals who are actually in charge and that a collapse is coming. In other words, he was less crazy than the average American in terms of thinking that he could vote for something.

It could also be that the average American is too stupid to appreciate the gravity of our situation and therefore avoids venturing down the blackhole of pondering the implications of whatever dystopia they might find themselves confronted with at any given moment.

Honestly, this is probably why more people aren’t setting themselves aflame rather than some noble character trait. I feel the gravity pulling on me like it’s an anvil tied to my ankles while I try to swim across the deep end of the pool.

People often ask me “Tom, why haven’t you gone crazy yet?” Well, my sanity is tempered by the fact that I don’t expect anything better from America. In fact, I can’t fathom paying attention to anything going on and maintaining reasonable expectations about this being a functional country.

“Ukraine” chants break out on the House floor…

This is your Congress, America.

pic.twitter.com/EFjHiJyYGv

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) April 20, 2024

I had no idea who Mike Johnson was before he became Speaker, just like I had no idea who Mike Pence was before the 2016 Trump campaign. They’re simply these generic GOP creatures. I can’t remember his predecessor’s name, he was the one who was always crying, but I heard he now sells legalized marijuana, and his daughter is with a dreadlocked black guy. Sounds about right. Johnson has a black son and abhors racism. Pathetic is a perquisite.

At least Biden is a character, this can be said about most of the Democrats as well. I’m not saying they’re good characters, but it’s not like you could just crank these freaks out of a machine like GOP politicians stuffing the suits.

Sometimes, Democrats say stuff that’s hilarious. Joe Biden just claimed his uncle was eaten by cannibals and there was that black congresswoman who said we were going to colonize the moon pretty soon because it was mostly made out of gas. A chuckle is something positive, at least. Remember, we’re getting the same results out of them as we get out of the Republicans.

I don’t bother voting, but how could anyone who did expect that the Republicans were going to do anything about the border or stop funding slaughters in Gaza and Ukraine? They ought to change the name on my SPLC page to Nostradamus.

House Passes $95 Billion Aid Package For Ukraine, Israel And Taiwan – But Not US Border https://t.co/gJs4gU6iI7

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) April 20, 2024

I’m not outraged by this shit because it’s what any rational person who wasn’t born yesterday should expect from the GOP. Do you think they have any sense of dignity whatsoever? A dog looking for scraps from the table conducts himself with more dignity than these creatures waiting obediently on their knees outside of Satan’s Synagogue with their ears pressed against the door.

What do Jews want? By this simple question, you can predict everything that the GOP is going to do, short of outright abolishing the 2nd Amendment. When it comes to these creatures, hope is a wound by which the craziness will fester in your heart. The human torch mentioned above said he spend 1,500 hours figuring this sort of stuff out, which means he had ample time to go insane.

I’m not saying you shouldn’t have hope, but you’re going to have to find it somewhere other than our political system. Where depends on yourself entirely. Perhaps it’s a bottle of scotch and a tray full of ice cubes waiting for you at home after a long day, maybe it’s the confirmation bias of watching the spectacle you predicted play out again and again. Schadenfreude could be the last bastion left in your psyche. There are so many creatures getting their comeuppance that you should never run out of it.

Whatever it is, if you let that fortification fall, I don’t think there’s any coming back. The sad reality is that stupidity and ignorance wrap around the average American like a warm pair of blankets. If you’re reading a publication such as this one, that condition doesn’t apply to you. Therefore, you must actively maintain your sanity in order to stave off the madness. Good luck.

Every single one of these stuffed suits will get what they have coming to them. Please don’t waste your time fretting about it. Congratulate yourself for not being one of them. Whatever your faults, at least you have that going for you.

The post Succumbing to the Madness appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The last three years and beyond have made it abundantly clear that the American Empire cares nothing for the future of young White men. This is especially true for young Southern men who are exceptionally hated and viewed with extreme suspicion by the American Empire. Numerous consequences are at play due to this antagonism, such as the decline in military recruitment and the rise of the American “competence crisis.”

The first issue, and one most easily understood by young White men, is regarding economic troubles. On the surface, the last three years of inflation have touched everyone (who isn’t rich). However, it has been particularly tough on young White men. This is related to how Corporate America operates (particularly the hiring process), as well as immigration. Young White men, for example, can’t check off any of the boxes that Corporate America desires. They want “people of color,” women, and sexual deviants. Most hiring agencies are filled with woke millennial women who will frequently overlook “cis-men,” and their corporate overlords will noddingly approve so they can brag about diversity and DEI initiatives. To make matters worse, unlike older men (Gen X and Boomers), we have little to no professional experience, as well as limited connections. Thus, aspiring young White men often remain unemployed (underemployed, if they’re lucky) and many are now giving up.

The Empire makes things worse by encouraging massive visas for foreign workers (Asians and Indians). This, of course, creates more competition that would have been unimaginable to older generations whose main competition was other skilled (American) White men. The problem also harms young White men without college degrees. While many of them can find blue-collar jobs easier, consumer price increases are eating into their earnings and damaging their ability to build up personal savings. Here, too, age hurts, as unlike other generations, we have almost no savings. Many younger guys live paycheck to paycheck. I’ve seen this firsthand with a friend, who is having to skip meals because inflation and taxes are gobbling up his paycheck. In short, if you’re a young White man, you’re entering a job market against unparalleled competition when compared to decades prior. Paired with racial and age discrimination, it’s making it nearly impossible for a young White man people to keep his head above water with the rising cost of living.

Another issue for young Southern White men is the Empire’s brutal domestic culture.

Modern media and shows demonize young White men. Everyone else is celebrated, while we’re being condemned as “racists” and “incels.” As someone who’s recently been on one of the big college campuses, in a liberal mecca, I can tell you how alien it feels to be in these progressive zones. We have no support networks beyond family, which a good deal of our generation also doesn’t have. Many young men are becoming socially isolated and cut off, especially after COVID. American “Cancel Culture” has become especially vicious to our young men. In this current environment, a guy could merely make a locker room or off-color joke and find himself doxxed, fired from his job (regardless of his proficiency and standing in the company), and permanently unemployable. Young men, at least the ones not ruined by soy and leftist nonsense, crave adventure and purpose. Modern America provides nothing but meaningless degeneracy and hedonism. Young White men take the brunt of the consequences of this. In many cases, it leads men into drugs, excessive gaming, fast food, drinking or even suicide. In some of the worst cases, it has led to mass shootings and other acts of senseless violence.

Modern America really doesn’t let young men be “men.” For example, if someone disrespects you as a man and you decide to call them out (verbally), you could be “canceled.” This is especially true if the offending party is a minority. Fisticuffs will land you in prison under hate-crime charges. If a woman is involved, expect various false charges, police reports, etc. Any altercation will be filmed via phone; and then you’ll be apprehended by the police and put on trial. In any event, you’ll likely end up economically bankrupt and/or in prison. In more sane times, young men fighting to settle a dispute was commonplace. Older generations often talk about fights they had when they were younger. However, in modern America, one physical altercation, no matter how minor, will end up with both parties being incarcerated.

The most personal challenge facing young White men is the dating game. According to the Pew Research Center, 63% of young men (18-29) are single. For young women, it’s only 34%. In this, there’s already a clear disadvantage to young men. Now, add on the end of traditional social networks designed to encourage community, dating, and courtship for young men (and women) and you have many men falling through the cracks. Churches, for example, direct most of their messages at women, older people, and younger couples/young parents. In many circumstances, the idea of just walking into a church as an outsider and thinking you’ll find a “good girl” is laughable in practice. You’re an outsider, and despite outward friendliness from most churches, the reality is that the young women in that church are already married or dating another member they already know.

Things only get worse outside the Church. In the real world, it’s practically the Wild West for dating. The churches, at least in theory, claim to practice abstinence and traditional values, but in the outside world “hooking up” is the norm. In the dating world of young men, we are dealing with non-virgins who still have attachment issues to their ex’s and/or former hook ups. In Gen Z, you also have many women who are homosexuals, whether lesbian or “bisexuals;” in either situation, they aren’t looking for a man nor should they (bisexual women) be considered girlfriend material. That 34% listed above also has numerous issues. Many guys with girlfriends will chuckle at these issues until it bites them in the backside, and it turns out their girl has been “talking” to other men. Social media, feminist propaganda, and dating apps have effectively produced a massive female population brimming with narcissistic, neurotic, liberal jezebels. While the dating pool isn’t entirely off-limits, it’s likely many of the good ones are off the market (married or have a serious boyfriend). To make matters worse, instead of providing useful and practical advice, young men are often mocked when they bring up these issues. This is downright shameful, considering just how new and unprecedented this issue is.

As a Gen Z Southerner, I can talk from personal experience that the modern world hates me. Sure, this doesn’t always boil down to the personal, I’d argue I get along well with people across the board in day-to-day interactions. However, the institutions of this country despise me and my ilk. In 2024, we are the ones disfranchised, abused, and considered as the societal pariah. Hollywood villainizes us, jobs refuse to hire us, and women, by and large, ignore us. “Our Democracy” is openly taking measures to make all of these civilizational poisons much worse. The ruling elite, a mixture of Yankees, Jews, and other degenerates, have opened our borders while taking a buzzsaw to traditional social networks like family, religion, and culture. For us, we won’t ever gaze upon the heroic monuments and statues of old. We won’t ever get to buy our own homes. Many of us will likely never be promoted due to our skin color and sex. We will be overlooked by judgmental, mediocre, self-worshiping young women ruling HR departments. The modernist society we live in today views us with suspicion and hatred.

In short, we, Young Fire-Eaters, have no reason to remain loyal or invested in the current regime. We should hate them, and we should be angry. We must work to see a day when that evil empire on the Potomac and its genocidal culture is gone. We must fulfill the dream of our gray coated ancestors by defeating the Yankee leviathan. Things have changed for the worse, but that doesn’t mean it’s permanent. When any empire collapses, new countries and peoples rise up. The 20th century is filled with many examples of this. Thus, while we face struggle now, we should rally around the fact that no empire, especially one so spiteful toward its own young men, survives indefinitely.

By rallying around the flag of a Free South, we can find hope in implementing a healthy Christian Southern society. When we get the chance to build a new country, we will clean away the moral rot, debauchery, and filth of the modern American Empire. We must work together to see to it that this happens. Our future Free Dixie will value, invest in, and better our young Southern men rather than treat them like the American Empire does – the reviled bottom-rung of a despicable caste system.

-By A Young Fire-Eater

The post Young Dixie: A Battle for Our Future appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One thing that always fascinates me is how quickly conservatives will recognize that many modern events are bold-faced lies, but will then immediately trust everything in the historical narrative.

I am sure some of you share my thoughts.

The modern conservative will talk your ear off about how the government lies today. They’ll talk all about the modern conspiracies and even many times laugh about things like the Covid lies or the indoctrination happening in colleges or rail on about the lies impacting the Trump campaign.

They’ll even openly mock things like the history and political books being pushed on kids.

Which is not a bad thing. They are right on that point.

But then, as soon as you step into the historical narrative with these folks, suddenly nothing is a lie. You’re just a wacky conspiracy nut. Clearly to them, everything about history that they learned in school and was recorded in the history books is true.

Just suddenly, out of nowhere, now everything is a lie. But nothing back then was. Oh no, definitely not!

These people honestly believe that anything that the moderns say regarding any time period before roughly the 1800s is just fact. No lies can be found back then, apparently. Everything we think about those centuries is just magically trustworthy.

I consider this modern conservative’s misunderstanding about historical lies inexcusable. The reason why this particular problem is unforgivable is because of the conservatives open acknowledgment of modern lies. These aren’t leftists: These people can see the modern lie. They should be able to see the historical lie, as well.

The worst part is that the further you go back in history, the more solid they believe the narrative.

But us dissidents know better. The rulers and their pawns lie today and they lie about what happened yesterday.

In fact, the further you go back in history, the less secure we should be about the prevailing narratives because of the simple lack of original documents. But you’ll never be able to tell a modern conservative that.

A great example that I’ve written on previously is the so-called “Dark Ages“. Nearly every conservative (esp. Boomer Conservatives) that you meet will argue that this time period was just horrible. That no one would want to live then because we would all just be serfs slaving away.

The problem? That’s a complete lie. The Middle Ages were a great time.

Yet, the word “dark” is their entire conception of 1000 years of history, spanning multiple nations and countries and even continents. “It was all just horrible”. Why, you ask? “Because I was taught as a kid it was the Dark Ages—how spooky! Darkness is bad!”

I know this seems like a funny exaggeration, but it is true. It is what they believe. Go ask them. I have. It’s always the same response.

And why do they believe it? Because that’s what the modern narrative about history tells them.

Somehow these folks can break off and realize that Covid was a lie, but then they become completely blind when the same elites (who have been in charge this entire time) tell them what to believe about the Middle Ages. The conservative just can’t seem to piece this together.

The Enlightenment elites have been here since the 18th century, if not the 17th century. These are the very same elites that teach history and have instructed us what to believe about certain time periods. They give us the history books and narratives that we use to discern the past. Why would you disbelieve the modern history books but believe the older history books, written by the same Enlightenment-riddled fools?

Also, is it any mystery why these elites condemn Christendom so greatly? With even the most minor understanding of history, you can figure out why they do so. It is because the Enlightenment replaced Christendom (The “Dark Ages” so-called). The Enlightenment mindset was anti-God. So, of course, they teach you to hate the Middle Ages and to call them the ‘Dark Ages’, because that’s when Christendom reigned. They don’t wanna go back to that. But we should.

Heck, even the individuals that revived the term “Dark Ages” were humanist-individualist revolutionaries who hated Christ and Western Civilization. They literally wanted to burn it all down. So, they coined it the Dark Ages to make it seem negative. Now, so-called “conservatives” that want to “defend Western Civilization” use the enemy’s term to degrade and disparage our own heritage.

Idiots, the whole lot of them.

This lack of historical understanding applies to all modern narratives surrounding our history. Once you see it, you won’t be able to stop:

• The average conservative can figure out that the government is lying about major cataclysmic events like Covid today, but can’t seem to piece together that maybe the government used past cataclysmic events in a similar fashion.
• The average conservative can realize that the war against terror was a sham and not based on what the narrative says it was based on, but they just can’t seem to grass that other wars, such as the Civil War, were also a sham. But who writes the narrative about both of these wars? The exact same people.

The summation is this: There is no difference between a historical lie and a modern lie.

They both share the same root. The elites teach their version of the historical lies to ensure that we stay within their operating framework under modernity, even if we reject modern lies. This is why conservatives keep losing ground.

To break out of it, we have to accept that a vast majority of what we have been taught, and what the average person believes, is a lie.

That includes both modern lies and historical lies about our heritage. Our elites, our media, and our cultural institutions all lie using both modern and historical lies. We can trust nothing they say.

This is not easy to do. I understand that. It requires diligent research to believe nearly anything about the modern world and the past world. But it is a task that we have to do. We have to put in that time.

And in fact, this was their whole goal this entire time:

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”– William J. Casey, CIA Director (1981)

This is the world they created. We have to accept that. We cannot trust anything they say; now or then.

The modern conservative does not have much of an excuse for falling into this trap. They know about the modern lies, so they should not be trusting the historical lies.

Rejecting modernity means rejecting all the lies. Not just the ones that we want to or that are convenient. We must accept that our old history books don’t always say the truth. Just as—newsflash—modern history books often don’t share the truth.

Do not trust the historical narrative so easily. Historical lies are just as powerful as modern lies. Many of the problems us dissidents have today exist because many on the Right still hold to the lies about our history. This is no minor issue for us.

Power, greed, corruption, and evil itself share the same roots from the very beginning of humanity. Each of them has that very strong need to keep The Lie(s) alive.

The post Historical Lies Versus Modern Lies appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I hope it may never be said of the South that she has ceased to appreciate the sacrifices of her men or the patient endurance of her women in her hour of darkness and need. I saw the widow yield to her country her eldest born, on whom she leaned to manage her estate; then another and another son in quick succession until her baby boy of sixteen was called. I saw the wife bid good-bye to the husband, and draw close to her breast the little ones who depended on him for bread, and looking aloft cry: “God pity us.” How fondly do I remember the contending emotions of fervent patriotism, love, and pride in my own heart as I saw my young husband start to the front arrayed in the suit of gray which my willing hands had woven, cut, and made. He who was mine now yielded to God and his country. Shall the South ever forget these things? Never! Sweep away the dust of time! Let nothing dim their lusters! As Rizpah, in sacred writ, stood guard over the bodies of the dead whom she might not bury, and drove away the vultures which would have fed on their bodies, so we will resist and drive away the unholy touch of every harpy who would drag down in the dust the sacred memories of the past. It ennobles us to write of noble deeds. It enkindles in our breasts the sacred flame of heroism, and the hovering spirits of our dead heroes shall inspire us to emulation.

Martha Neel Northen (1839-1918)

(Note to readers: Part IV of this series may be found here; links to the three previous parts are accessible from that part as well.

Mrs. Northen’s patriotic “Appeal to History” forming my epigraph closely resembles sympathetic contemplations my mind has conjured many times in recent years; contemplations upon the sad and pitiful scene as it must have unfolded, when e.g. Mrs. Cary Ann Anderton Morris lovingly embraced, as she said goodbye for the last time to, her farmer husband, Benjamin, and her two eldest sons, Leonard(18) and Seborn(16), sending her men off to defend home and fireside, and the Southern way of life. With a tear in my eye and a lump in my throat have I so closely imagined the scene Mrs. Northen’s first-hand account describes in her missive, to wit:

“I saw the wife bid good-bye to the husband, and draw close to her breast the [four remaining] little ones who depended on him for bread, and looking aloft cry: ‘God pity us.’” While her husband and sons survived the war, Mrs. Morris regrettably did not. It is with perfect assurance as well that my inclusion of such an appeal by such an one as Mrs. Northen to head any portion of his public speeches touching upon the Just Cause of Confederates and the Confederacy, our able orator-historian would, I trust, warmly embrace and approve. In the spirit of Mrs. Northen’s appeal therefore, I give you Part V of “The South Vindicated,” by Judge John Henry Rogers, Esq.):

“To me the sweetest and noblest chapter in the book of our misfortunes and sorrows was the treatment which the South accorded the fallen chief of the Confederacy. His was a pure, a great, and an incorruptible career. He had served the Union with great distinction in high stations, in war and in peace. No ambitious longings for place or power now remained. All hope for his preferment had gone out in the darkness of defeat. Imprisoned and in irons, he suffered for them all. Released without trial, no plea for pardon, disfranchised, broken in health, and tottering with care and age, he returned to his people, to be welcomed as no other man, and in the calm dignity of a private citizen, in his quiet home, he remained their idol, their counselor, and their friend, devoting the last days of his noble life to the preparation of a defense and justification of that people for whom he had been made a vicarious sacrifice. He had never lost their faith, their confidence, their admiration, or their love. There is something strong and deserving of all honor in a people like this.

“We are assembled here for no ignoble ends. We are here to revive no issues settled by that unhappy conflict. We are not here to defame others, or pervert or warp the truth. We are not here to exaggerate or magnify the glory or virtues of one section of our common country at the expense of another; nor are we here to desecrate this occasion, by the gratification of personal ambition, or the acquirement of social distinction or political preferment. We are here that mankind may not forget, or falsehood nor calumny cloud or tarnish the calm judgment of posterity, as to the sincerity of the motives and the honorable conduct of the Confederate soldiers.

“We affirm our desire that our children may understand these things; that they may the more reverence their ancestry; that they may know of their sufferings and sacrifices and be able to defend their good names, and, proud of their achievements, emulate, in the great struggles of the future, if such await our country, the fidelity, patriotism, love of home and country attested by the veterans of 1861 on a hundred bloody battlefields.

“Who would have them forget the Lees, the Johnstons, the Jacksons, and the Hills? Who would have them forget Bragg, Beauregard, Hardee, Price, Polk, and Hood? Who would have them forget that great wizard of the saddle, Bedford Forrest, and our own little Joe Wheeler, Pat Cleburne, the lamented Walthall, and innumerable others? Who would have us forget the grand old man yet with us, and others still spared; and the hosts who made for them names that can never perish from the earth as long as genius and courage and patriotism challenge the admiration of mankind?

“Who would have them ignorant of the glorious charge of Pickett and others at Gettysburg? Who would have them forget the death struggle at Franklin, Tenn., where the Confederates won a glorious victory, but at a cost of eleven general officers killed and wounded and six thousand men – nearly one-fifth of the army – in five hours? Where Gist and Adams and Strahl and Granberry and the intrepid Pat Cleburne fell in the very forefront of battle, and around them in great numbers were strewn their gallant dead?

“Who would have them forget Chickamauga, where friendly darkness shielded the army of the Cumberland from destruction? Who would have them forget Jackson in the Valley of Virginia, whose campaigns have challenged the military critics of England and Germany to find a single error? Dr. Hunter McGuire, Jackson’s corps surgeon, in an address delivered in Richmond in 1897, made this statement:

Therefore it is with swelling heart and deep thankfulness that I recently heard some of the first soldiers and military students of England declare that within the past two hundred years the English-speaking race had produced but five soldiers of the first rank – Marlborough, Washington, Wellington, Robert Lee, and Stonewall Jackson. I heard them declare that Jackson’s campaign in the Shenandoah Valley, in which you, and you and myself in my subordinate place, followed this immortal, was the finest specimen of strategy and tactics of which the world has any record; that in this series of marches and battles there was never a blunder committed by Jackson; that his campaign in the Valley was superior to either of those made by Napoleon in Italy.

One British officer, who teaches strategy in a great European college, told me that he used this campaign as a model of strategy and tactics, and dwelt upon it for several months in his lectures; that it was taught for months in each session in the schools of Germany, and that Von Moltke, the greatest strategist, declared it was without a rival in the world’s history. This same British officer told me that he had ridden on horseback over the battlefields of the Valley, and carefully studied the strategy and tactics there displayed by Jackson; that he had followed him to Richmond, where he joined with Lee in the campaign against McClellan in 1862; that he had followed him in his detour around Pope, and in his management of his troops at Manassas; that he had studied his environment of Harper’s Ferry and its capture, his part in the fight at Sharpsburg and his flank movement around Hooker – and that he had never blundered. Indeed, he added, “Jackson seemed to be inspired.” Another British officer told me that “for its numbers the Army of Northern Virginia had more force and power than any army that ever existed.”

“It is cruel to discriminate, but this tribute from such a source is too rich to be lost. It should go into history as the priceless heritage of our people. I ought not to specify, but will you bear with me for one further incident, pathetic as it is heroic, and glowing with the spirit which animated the sacred dead we strive to honor?

“At Lexington, Va., where the remains of Gens. Lee and Jackson now sleep, is the Virginia Military Institute. It was in successful operation in May, 1864, when Seigel advanced up the Valley. Gen. John C. Breckinridge was sent with an inadequate force to arrest his advance. A corps of cadets, boys seventeen and under, from this school, consisting of a battalion of four companies of infantry, and a section of three-inch rifled guns, were ordered to report to him at Staunton.

“The march was made in two days. Two or three short marches brought him in touch with Breckinridge’s veterans. Their bright, gaudy uniforms, clean and new, their smooth, girlish faces, trim step, and jaunty airs subjected them to severe raillery and all manner of fun from the old soldiers. Breckinridge did not want to use them if it could be avoided.

“Having determined to receive the tack of Seigel at New Market, the boy corps was ordered, in a beating rain, to report to Gen. Echols. It was not long until the bright, new uniforms, bedraggled with rain and mud, presented the corps in a dilapidated and pitiable state; but they moved on and took position on the extreme left of the reserve line of battle. Wharton’s brigade was in advance, and the boy-corps, brigaded with Echols, was in the reserve.

“The order to advance soon came. A slight knoll was reached, and the batteries opened; but, not having the range, little damage was done to Wharton’s men. But when Echols’s men reached it they had the range, and their fire began to tell with fearful accuracy. Let their Colonel tell the rest. He says:

Great gaps were made through the ranks; but the cadet, true to his discipline, would close in to the center to fill the interval, and push steadily forward. The alignment of the battalion under this terrible fire, which strewed the ground with killed and wounded for more than a mile on open ground, would have been creditable even on a field day. They moved steadily forward for more than a mile beyond New Market. When within three hundred yards of the enemy’s batteries, they opened with canister, case shot and long lines of musketry at the same time. The fire was withering – it seemed impossible that any living creature could escape and here we sustained our heaviest loss. The commander fell, but a cadet captain took command of the battalion and moved forward until they had gotten into the first line, when all took shelter behind a fence, and then, after a few minutes, with a shout, a fusillade, and a rush, the enemy fled and the day was won.

“They had gone as far as the best troops in the army. There were none to guy them then. They had challenged the love and admiration of the veterans of the Army of Northern Virginia, and fifty-two of their battalion, of the two hundred and fifty composing it, killed and wounded that day, won them a place they can never lose in history. I cannot tell you what it was that inspired those beardless boys to deeds of noble bearing and death. Whatever it was ran through the Confederate armies.

“These were the sons of the old South. Is it to be despised? Where shall brighter or nobler examples of heroism and sacrifice be found? And may I not revert to the manner in which the war was conducted by the Confederates? To this I point with justifiable pride. It was a splendid race of men that built up the old South. They were the descendants of the Cavaliers. They, like other men, had their faults, but they cherished the glorious memories of a long line of ancestry who despised all that was contemptible, little, and mean; they were sticklers for the observance of the highest sense of honor; they built their lofty characters on the observance of the truth; they hated moral and physical cowardice, and their homes were the habitations of virtue, chivalry, and hospi- tality; but they were conservative; they were lovers of home and the devoted friends of civil and religious liberty. They believed in as little government as was consistent with the maintenance of law and order, and that whatever went beyond this was an infringement upon the liberty of the individual, destructive of that love the citizen owed the State, and tended to destroy the self-reliance and independence of the individual upon whose love, strength, and manhood rested the temple of free constitutional government. What contributions they have made to the betterment of mankind, and what inspiration they have given the great masses who have builded this wonderful country of ours!

“The great Mississippian, the lawyer, the statesman and the General, as great in peace as in war, himself having borne a conspicuously brilliant and honorable part in the heroic struggle of which I speak, in an address delivered at the unveiling of a monument to the Confederate dead at Jackson, Miss., said of these men of the old South of whom I speak, that: “From among them came the statesman who wrote the Declaration of Independence; and, strange as it may sound in this day of universal freedom, it is said that all who signed the Declaration, except those from the State of Massachusetts, and perhaps one or two others, were slave-holders.

“From among them came the Father of His Country, the Father of the Constitution, and the greatest of all its expounders. At the head of the great armies, in the presidential office, in cabinet and court, and in all the nation’s high councils, everywhere in peace and in war, great Southern lights illuminate the annals of America, and shed upon our country’s name its chief honor and renown. From the foundation of the government, through all the epochs of peace and arms, down to 1861, Southern statesmen and orators, Southern philosophers and judges, Southern patriots and soldiers have enacted the brightest chapters of this country’s history, and to them we are indebted for the fundamental sources of its present power.

“The descendants of such men as these conducted the war on the Confederate side. Is it surprising that it was conducted on the highest plane of modern warfare? In no single instance is it recorded, even in the partisan histories already written, that ruin and desolation followed in the footsteps of its armies; nor that their marches were known by “pillars of fire by night and clouds of smoke by day,” nor that the birds of the air could not follow them without carrying their rations.” […] [To be continued in Part VI]

The post Confederate History Month, 2024, Part V appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

April 9th, a day adorned with many martyrs –
Abbot Hedda of Peterborough,
Abbot Theodore of Crowland,
And dozens of other English monks
Cut asunder by the Viking Danes;
Bishop Desan of Persia with companions
In the hundreds, sentenced by Sapor;
Massylitan Martyrs of northwest Africa,
Honored by saints, Augustine and Bede;
New Martyrs of Lesbos, monks Raphael
And Nicholas, cruelly tortured
By the Turks, the first sawn through the jaw,
The second died at the gruesome sight,
The children Eleni and Irene,
Mistreated and murdered, too:
Eleni beaten fiercely,
Irene lost an arm
And suffocated in a cask
With a fire blazing underneath –
Several more died with them.
On April 9th hosts of martyrs
Finished their trials and received their crowns
From the Victor over Death, Christ our God.
On April 9th the Southern people
Began their martyrdom at Appomattox,
A contest not quick like those of others,
But slow and subtle, full of cunning,
As Yankee apostates, devils, demons,
And other swindlers attempt to draw
Dixie’s folk away from the Soul-mender,
The Flesh-healer, her Savior Jesus Christ.
The weight of years presses upon us,
Many have fallen into the traps of temptation,
The desire to give up grows stronger.
But only the athlete who competes
Can win a worthy crown.
The Southron who quits,
Who sits him down to rest,
Who forsakes Christ and his Southern kin,
Will receive a little pleasure now,
But never-ending shame and torment
After his body breathes its last.
Not so the faithful Southron,
Who will suffer and even die
For God and for his fathers,
Suffer so that Dixie may live on,
Make a sacrifice of themselves
As did Maury, Mosby,
Ashby, and Hill. He will receive
An imperishable crown from the Hand of God,
And an honored place in the Heavenly Southland,
Where all the redeemed of Dixie will gleam
With the Uncreated Light of Christ,
Like the Martyrs of April 9th,
Like the martyrs of other days and years and lands –
Sharing in their spirit,
They will likewise share in their reward –
Whom they will never tire of praising,
With the Father and the Holy Ghost,
Now and to the ages of ages. Amen.

-By Walt Garlington

The post The Long Martyrdom of the South appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

When Oliver Anthony came out of nowhere with his song “Rich Men North of Richmond,” I was intrigued and decided

The post The Producerism of Oliver Anthony appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Originally published August 30, 2023, at Dissident Mama. Meade Skelton is a Richmond-based musician specializing in “inspirational songs filled with traditional

The post Meade Skelton on the Dissident Mama Podcast appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Things aren’t going too well for America and Western civilization in general. In fact, they seem to be going existentially

The post Proceeding Apace appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’ve written about this one before when I mused about starting a consequences consulting firm, but for the benefit of any new readers, here’s my advice on a certain race expressed in probability theory:

As the number of African Americans involved in your life increases, the probability of your murder approaches 1.

There’s a less polite phrase about the combustion of an ancient, compressed form of carbon as well. You might’ve heard of it, but I’m not the sort of gentleman who spouts crude aphorisms and racial slurs. What I’m trying to do today is note a series of things impacting our society and speculate about the implications.

First, I’d like to note that law enforcement and the public school system are in place to deal with blacks. Every miscreant this planet has to offer is flooding into America these days, but originally, blacks were why we have these systems. They’re actually nonessential for white people.

If left to ourselves, schools would be organized based on various secular and religious communities while some people would school their children at home. The education provided would actually be far superior to the current public schools, whose primary directives are not punishing blacks and not giving them worse grades than whites.

It’s the same thing with the police. White people have conducted most of their historical existence without modern police forces and done just fine. The police are good at stuff like keeping white people from driving drunk, and sure that’s good, but society still got by better than it is today when driving around drunk wasn’t a big deal. Most Europeans just walk home drunk because they didn’t have to spread out to flee blacks. There’s often nowhere to park in front of their drinking establishments anyway.

The police are here to deal with black people. When Jason Aldean came out with his controversial small-town ballad, it was hilarious because everyone knew he was referring to the inhuman criminal pastimes of blacks, including blacks who flipped out because they knew he was specifically referring to them:

“Sucker punch somebody on a sidewalk
Carjack an old lady at a red light.”

He might as well have just written: “Don’t let the sun go down on you in my small town, n-words. Nooses ain’t meant for hangin’ empty from trees.” The sentiments conveyed would’ve been the same. That’s what the whole uproar was really about. I don’t advocate lynching or any form of extrajudicial violence, as a disclaimer.

Back on track, the reason America has these systems to deal with blacks is that they can’t deal with themselves because they’re not genetically coded with the innate capacity for civilization.

Democratic party official Shivanthi Sathanandan is left bloodied in violent carjacking and now calls for tougher crime laws after once vowing to dismantle Minneapolis Police Department https://t.co/IWjGeHsJaN pic.twitter.com/ipU3TVsoEG

— Daily Mail US (@DailyMail) September 8, 2023

Broken leg. Four teens. We’re told their demonstrable lack of civilizational capacity is the result of all sorts of terms for racism, white supremacy, not given enough resources, and the legacy of slavery, but really, it’s rather simple. Sub-Saharan Africans have DNA from a pre-hominid ancestor not shared by any other race.

As a whole, this is probably what imbues them with a set of definitive traits such as poor intelligence, a lack of impulse control, an inability to think with a significant degree of abstraction or internal monologue, and a very short time horizon. These traits don’t result in a civilization. Without contact by other races, it constrains them to a hunter-gatherer existence. They’re programmed to be fine with that, which is the same reason that white people assume blacks are stressed out from all the shootings. In reality, they’re not, which is why they shoot so much. This existence would stress (product of a longer time horizon) us out for the same reason we don’t shoot each other for no good reason.

This wide genetic disparity also gives them some distinct physical features which is why AI can confuse them with apes because it’s just doing math on facial points. That’s why it’s so cringe when white conservatives claim they don’t consider that someone is black. This is impossible, their brains are automatically performing pattern recognition and recognizing them as alien. I had one flip out on me once at a barbeque when I casually noted that random blacks had been calling my phone. He became indignant and inquired how I could have known they were black and threatened to report me to my CO.

It was initially considered that blacks were a species of ape by Christians, Muslims, and Jews, but eventually the Catholic Church declared them human because it was determined that they possessed a degree of spiritual capacity. In the South, some slave owners would let them attend church while others wouldn’t, deeming it of no relevance to them. Everybody has to make up their own mind on these religious matters.

Kenjuan McDaniel, 25, was arrested on August 29 after police said lyrics in one of his recent music videos included details about a murder that had not been publicly released pic.twitter.com/3YeYBTYVsm

— No Jumper (@nojumper) September 8, 2023

There’s this other canard about how American slaves weren’t taught to read because then they’d revolt after developing their intellectual potential that I’d like to address. If reading would’ve been of no utility to their labors, and if after years of modern public schooling many of them still can’t read, why would race-realist slave owners have bothered?

Literate slaves were common in civilizations of antiquity. In the Islamic world, a slave might serve the function of a prime minister. In Roman times, literate slaves might be privy to the highest matters of state or tutor the children of the elite. Nearly every mother of the Ottoman sultans was a slave. Our slaves were treated the way they were because of the traits previously outlined.

Being a slave or free wouldn’t change these traits, which, as I’ve noted, are genetic. In these other civilizations, there were also distinctions, often rather grim, in how black slaves were treated compared to slaves from other races. In contrast, we were often downright egalitarian. For example, whites were shipped on the same ships by the same companies using the same packing methods all the way down to Australia from Britain and no blacks were subjected to genital amputation.

Kingdoms like Nubia, Kush, and the fabled Mansa Musa are cited as evidence of African civilization. In reality, blacks were held as large slave populations. It would be like saying an antebellum plantation was an African agricultural operation because hundreds of blacks were working the fields. I could get into the Moors and the Pyramids nonsense. Sometimes it’s fun, but it feels rather tiresome today.

So, the long-winded point I’m making here is that nobody is going to impose a degree of civilization on them, they can’t do this for themselves even if they felt so inclined, which collectively, they don’t. Thus, bad actors who hate Christ can weaponize them to undo the civilization in which they’re currently located in the name of racial justice and equality. This is our current predicament.

Therefore, I’d like to note that although blacks aren’t adept at logic, there’s an escalatory logic to their civilizational dysfunction: it will just get worse until things fall apart. In this regard it’s no different from the trannies and wars or any other aspect of the evil madness that drives our persecutors.

This is crazy.

Even Beverly Hills has become a boarded up ghost town due to all of the crime.

This video is staggering. pic.twitter.com/kbjeAbjiUL

— QE Infinity (@StealthQE4) September 5, 2023

I’m not an idealist who thinks the ship will be turning around, but in preparation for coming out of the other end of calamity, I think it would be useful to point out that blacks are behaving the way they are, because that’s who they are. Conservatives will talk about the content of your character and platinum plans, so that’s why our dissident content sphere is obligated to point out cold reality and common sense.

I was just trying to remember why I brought this topic up today. It was because I watched a few minutes of the new Resident Evil series last night which turned out to be about black scientists. I’m not sure where I’m rambling, but things aren’t going to improve through leniency or giving them free stuff and privileges at our expense.

If we’re not going to enforce most laws against them either, the concept of separation actually becomes quite reasonable. People would just naturally do that anyway if we weren’t subjected to decades of black weaponization schemes.

I’d ask these conservatives if they’d like to be able to shop at stores or not? Would they like to eat a stray round or not? Would they like to be sucker punched on a sidewalk or not? Would they like their elderly mother carjacked at a red light or not? Alright then, there’s only one solution.

Practical solutions are important, while utopian idealism is unhelpful. In that scenario, I’d have these conservatives rounded up, too. They’d desperately wish they were receiving the black treatment.

A man who claims he had sex with Barack Obama in 1999 tells his story.

Wednesday. 6pm ET. pic.twitter.com/iDYMSww1KS

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) September 5, 2023

There’s no shortage of down low brothas who do crack. Who really cares about this shit? Oh, wow you’re exposing the content of his character. The post We’d Get By Just Fine appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

If I may, I’ll continue on the theme of occupying space and residing in the places which belong to our people. This land is ours, by blood and toil, and we need to always remind outsiders that they are guests, and they stay at our discretion.

I’ll start by telling an absolutely true story, a recent event I witnessed out in the wild.

Hotel lobbies are interesting venues, you can just sit back and watch, something or someone interesting will soon grab your attention. I had just arrived back at my hotel following a long day of meetings, they were nothing special, just normal boring business stuff. That was until, looking to my left and into the hotel lobby, the area where they serve the morning breakfast, it appeared a perfect storm was gathering. My appetite to play the cultural spectator was about to be satisfied. What was to become something fantastical in an anthropological study was transpiring, and I had a front row seat.

Foreigners, all of one ethnicity and all happily socializing in the common area, were finishing up their meals. This particular food has a distinctive and vibrant smell, one that usually makes me ill; although, on this occasion the smell was dispersed enough that the impact was minimal. So, I sat and observed. The group had completely taken over the entire lobby; men, women, and children. All the men dressed in business casual (silk and polyester) and the women in more traditional tribal attire. A group of about 200 were set to occupy that space for some time. Well, until something happened.

Out of nowhere, a stocky bald White man swaggered into the lobby, in his hands he carried a few bottles of liquor. After assessing the situation, I assumed he would just walk back up to his room. He didn’t, instead he noticed the large crowd occupying all but one little spot at a table. The table was nearly in the center of where the foreign colonists had planted their flag. This unassuming, yet I would say, bold man had no inhibitions about projecting a bit of gravitas in the middle of all these foreigners. He placed his bottles down, kindly asked one young man if he would move over and began to drink. It was obvious that the crowd was rather shocked with this audacious move. I suppose that they assumed their numbers would deter anyone else staying at the hotel from intruding into their joyful, though exclusionary, gathering. However, they soon learned that this lone White man was not intimidated, and he was not alone.

One by one, as I observed, the man’s friends began to join him. You could tell by the way they greeted each other and by their accents – they were Southern. And as their conversation grew in volume, the foreigners gently rippled away from the growing number of natives. Many awkward glances came from the crowd as these sudden new arrivals, a little more than a dozen, sent the outsiders to flight. In less than 20 minutes, the vast majority of the occupiers had scattered. However, in a desperate last counter-offensive, the organizers of the foreign crowd sent the night manager (also of the same tribe) over to these Southern men, demanding them to disperse and not drink in the lobby. This was on the pretense of impressionable children being present. Interestingly, the manager picked the least intimidating and youngest of the new arrivals to demand immediate compliance, sighting this newly discovered regulation.

After noticing the exchange, the original stocky bald man moved in to counter the incursion by the night manager. Ever so gently, but firm, he lectured the usurper, explaining that he had read every policy regarding the lobby, and nothing in the hotel terms prohibited his fellowship from congregating in the lobby for drinks. In full retreat, the manager departed, and the battle was over. The colonizers were set to flight, the bureaucracy had been put in its place, and these Southern men had retaken the lobby, projecting dominance over a numerically superior force, and without being obnoxious.

In so many places, even in small Southern towns, intruders have taken up residence in our common areas. And many times, we have willingly abandoned these spaces, areas our ancestors built, in a cowardly attempt to avoid contact and confrontation with people who have no right to commandeer them as their own.

It’s time to retake these areas. Gather together in large enough quantities, go to these locations, and displace the invaders. Retake Everything!

In the next few articles, I’ll discuss how this is happening already, and in multiple segments within our culture.

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post Retake Everything appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One of the more common claims of the anti-White, and especially anti-Southern, Left is that they need to launch a full throttled attack on the symbols and history of the West because, “Whites have not made amends for the harm they’ve done.” Now, of course, this is a one-sided way of looking at history. Although some evil may have been committed by White conquerors in the past, there was no real difference in the harms committed by the West and the mistreatment committed by Islamic or Chinese conquerors. However, the West did also provide more benefits by ending certain horrific cultural practices, such as sati (widow burning) in India. But there is also a deeper problem with this line of thought from the Left. The reality is that no matter what the West does to compensate for its past crimes, both real and imagined, nothing will ever be enough to satisfy the Left, nothing short of Whites committing mass suicide across the globe. We know this because of the massive cultural shift that has occurred in the United States over the last 50 years – the reappraisal of the legacy of western expansion in America, and with that, the death of the Western film genre. Despite this massive victory, the Left will not give one iota of thanks and, as such, we should not expect that any acquiescence will satisfy them. They do not want you to simply be honest about your history, they want you dead and your children either gone or self-hating eunuchs.

Needless to say, this article will briefly address the history of the American Indian. Additionally, there is something that must be discussed – the tendency of Southerners to take a largely sympathetic view of the American Indian. I think this inclination is based on three pillars: 1) family stories of being “part Indian” and passed down from generation to generation (Cherokee princess), 2) respect for a worthy adversary, and 3) sympathy from a shared history of conquest. To address each of these points one by one:

1. This is largely untrue. Of course, there are examples where this is true and I’m not one to fret over 100% racial purity, but the fact is that despite what family legends have long claimed, modern DNA testing has revealed that partial Indian ancestry is nowhere near as widespread as has been avowed.
2. Respect for adversaries has a long history in healthy societies, even the Romans could admire Hannibal’s might. Yes, it is honorable to prefer death to enslavement and conquest, but this is not what is going on in contemporary Indian fetishism. Rather than admiring the Indian for being a fierce warrior, the modern narrative is to reconstruct the Indians as a peace-loving people who lived in harmony with nature (the noble savage). It’s a contrived myth, but it’s also not useful for traditional Southern notions of honor, land stewardship, and masculinity.
3. This point is the most understandable. Indians and Southerners have something we both share: we are only “Americans” because we were conquered. Be that as it may, those that want Whites to make “amends” for that conquest absolutely despise Southerners, so giving in will provide us no favors.

None of this is to say that atrocities were not committed, they did occur. However, this is not about providing some nuance with how history is presented; this is about using history to beat the White race into submission.

Now, with that out of the way, a very clear example of Whites submitting to the Left and getting nothing in return can be observed with the death of the Western. As odd as it is to say now, when Westerns are made sparingly, from the late 1930s to the early 1970s Westerns were some of the biggest box office draws and had quite a few of the biggest legends in the film industry, such as John Wayne, John Ford, Jimmy Stewart, etc. But then something happened: as the Vietnam War heated up and the Left radicalized, they began to take a critical look at the legacy of westward expansion, the Old West, and the Western genre. Drawing from earlier radical scholars, the Left began to push a new narrative that painted American western expansion as one of the great crimes of history. Eventual, this seeped into the broader culture, cumulating in a seismic shift around 1970 with the release of the film version Little Big Man and Dee Brown’s book Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee. In just the space of a few short years, the public’s perception of the American frontier went from one of pride, viewing it largely as an example of heroic bravery, to one of cultural shame. There is a reason the American Indian population took an unexpected jump in the 1980 census when compared to the 1960 census, one that was far too large and could not be explained by an increase in the birthrate. In the years between 1960 and 1980, a considerable amount of White people decided they were really American Indians, largely doing so for the social credit.

And this had a major impact on the Western genre. Throughout the 1970s, the Western began to slip in popularity, becoming a smaller and smaller segment of the film industry’s output until the release of Heaven’s Gate in 1980. Heaven’s Gate is a great film, but at the time of its release it was a complete disaster – destroying the once promising career of director Michael Cimino, United Artists, and even the Western itself. Westerns were already in decline, and some have been made since, but the Western is like no other genre in that the success of one film does not guarantee a legion of imitators. From 1989 to1995, Hollywood mostly considered the horror genre dead – with the best films either being non-U.S. (Dust Devil), ignored upon release (Castle Freak), or repackaged as “thrillers” to avoid the stigma of Freddy Krueger and Jason Voorhees (Silence of the Lambs). But all it took was the success of Scream in 1996 to kick horror back into high gear. This is not the case with Westerns, even the massive back-to-back successes of Dances with Wolves and Unforgiven could not bring the genre back to prominence.

What this means is that White America abandoned a genre that they had grown up with and, critically, an art form they could call their own (with all respect to Sergio Leone). All of this is thanks to the Left, and the Left’s response is to act like it never happened and that Americans still largely believe in a “white hat vs. black hat” view of the Old West. This shift becomes all the more spectacular when one considers just how long ago it was. For the sake of simplicity, let’s assume that the last generation for whom Westerns were largely a staple of their early cinematic diet were born in 1963. That makes them 60 in 2023, a mere five years from retirement. Those who were born after 1963 did not, as a generation, grow up on Westerns and, as such, their exposure to the genre came only if: 1) they had traditional parents that wanted them to watch something wholesome and masculine (like me), or 2) they fell in love with films and wanted to see those classic Westerns (also like me).

All this might be understandable, if not excusable, if classic Hollywood Westerns really were the mindless celebration of the slaughter of American Indians the Left imagines. But this is a pathetic stereotype – even during the classic period, the better films of the genre presented far more nuance than the Left cares to admit. Perhaps no actor gets it on the nose on this issue more than John Wayne, but if one examines the four best Westerns of his career, The Searchers and The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance by John Ford and Red River and Rio Bravo by Howard Hawks, a more complex image emerges. In both Red River and The Searchers, Wayne plays men on a mission who are unable to regulate their passions; as such, their missions, although virtuous, become their masters and it nearly leads them to ruin (Wayne is all but playing Captain Ahab in The Searchers). The film’s best scene illustrates the dark side of Wayne’s character. Meanwhile, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance is willing to admit that much of what makes up popular understandings of the Old West is indeed rooted in myth, but it also has some maturity and is willing to admit that those myths, while not true, do have significant societal value (I’m dancing around the ending for the benefit of those who have not seen it, if that is you, go correct this mistake ASAP). Rio Bravo, to be sure, is a celebration of heroism, but it’s not actually supposed to be realistic. There is a reason the sets were built to 7/8th scale for the final shootout – so the actors looked larger than life.

Despite all of this, it was not enough. Because it will never be enough. If giving up such an important and valuable artform like the Western will not cause the Left to give pause or thanks, what do you think can be reasonably done to please them? We should take the lessons from the death of the Western to heart. To the Left, literally nothing has changed since the 1950s, and even their memories of that period are largely distorted. We must learn from the mistakes of the past. Thanks largely to the Left, the Western has been abandoned, and we did not even get a “thank you” in return. It would be madness to expect something different this time.

The post Never Enough: The Death of the American Western appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

While old news at this point, the infamous rightwing populist Mississippi Senator, Chris McDaniel, failed to win the lieutenant gubernatorial Republican primary against Establishment incumbent Delbert Hosemann with 42.8% of the GOP vote. Of course, this is of no surprise. Hosemann refused to debate McDaniel and had many of his Democrat friends encourage cross party voting in a Republican primary in order to win. Furthermore, it is incredibly rare for an incumbent to be unseated in Mississippi. These Boomers do not seem interested in passing the torch anytime soon even though they have already snuffed out the flames.

With this in mind, Southern politicians loathe populism. It historically thrives among working-class Whites and has not changed from that demographic today. To give some context, the Redeemers who ousted the Radical Republicans from Dixie and brought an end to the Reconstruction Era paled in comparison to their forebears. The antebellum aristocracy had been eradicated and was replaced with a political elite comprised of lesser sons, businessmen, lawyers, stakeholders, middle managers, and railroad executives. To put it bluntly, these men were neither prepared nor bred to rule, and their track records by the end of it all reflected this. By the 1880s, they had already turned to the same sort of corruption the Radicals were universally accused of.

Various agrarian populist movements, to include the Greenbacks, Farmers’ Alliance, and the Populist Party, occurred during the 1880s and 1890s, most of which failed. The Southern political machines were simply too powerful to vote out in most places. It was not a secret that these machines were based in the densely populated Black Belt counties. As such, populist rural Caucasians began pushing for restrictions on negro voters due to the politicians using the latter as a means of negating White votes and staying in power. Seeing the writing on the wall, Mississippi ratified its 1890 “Jim Crow” Constitution, the only state to do so prior to the Populist Party movement of the 1890s. Whereas this would have the effect of restricting the negro vote because of property and literacy requirements, it also provided a check on Caucasian populist voters via the implementation of the poll tax. The poll tax disfranchised a large number of poor Whites and was designed specifically to target that demographic, a fact often forgotten. Southern populism would not find the true extent of its potential until the adoption of White primaries in the early 1900s. For more information on the topic, read Redneck Liberal: Theodore G. Bilbo and the New Deal by Chester Morgan, Revolt of the Rednecks: Mississippi Politics, 1876-1925 by Albert Kirwan, and Origins of the New South, 1877–1913 by C. Vann Woodward. After a slew of populist leaders during the first half of the 20th Century, Southern populism has been effectively dead since the end of the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s.

Fast forward to today, and modern populism has failed to penetrate any political machines or seize any real political power despite the various movements since the 1990s. Pat Buchannan, Ron Paul, the Tea Party, MAGA, the Alt-Right, and more have all failed. At the state level all across the South and conservative America, this also rings true with the only real success within 30 years having been Ron DeSantis in Florida, and there is no telling who will fill his shoes once he is out of the governor’s mansion.

To bring this all back full circle, it is amazing how staunchly “conservative” states seem incapable of passing any right-of-center legislation or allowing any voters to actually vote in major social policies. This rings especially true for Mississippi, the supposedly most conservative state in the Union. Gay marriage, abortion, immigration, selling off of vast swathes of rural land to timber for New England companies, and the state flag have all failed to receive any public votes. It also has not yet escaped this author’s notice that not a single public opinion poll of the Magnolia flag has been released, and all sorts of political corruption shenanigans occur, quite openly, during every major social push by the Left or during elections. While unremitting populism of the masses is generally not something to be desired, but it does provide an excellent check on unrestricted tyranny of the business-lawyer political elite. Aristocracy is not a bad thing, and the South has languished since its extermination in the 1860s. Even the Bible makes it obvious that a social hierarchy is needed for civilizational stability and health. Where do you think high culture comes from?

So, it came as a bit of a shock to myself when I came across an article advocating for allowing citizens to vote on abortion in a similar manner to how other states do it. I find it pretty wild when Establishment “journalists” push for a bastardized left-populism when they feel as though it could potentially be beneficial to them. Funny how that works.

It is also pretty striking just how non-Boomer these conservative populist politicians are. Chris McDaniel and Melanie Sojourner of Mississippi, Ron DeSantis of Florida, Marjorie Taylor-Greene of Georgia, Corey Stewart of Virginia, and others are all of Generation X stock; Trump is merely an exception to this. These Gen Xers are facing the political Good Ol’ Boy systems built up by people born during and before the mid-1960s. Southern rightwing populist politicians draw from Caucasian working-class and younger crowds. All the things discussed here should really paint a picture for the new readers here or the politically unaware.

Not much else to say about this topic which has not already been said before. Regarding this series’ namesake, I do believe Tate Reeves is a conservative at heart who did not desire to change the state flag, albeit he is very weak-willed. However, with Mississippi’s GOP voters’ desperation to vote party-line and ensure Boomer incumbents remain in power so as to continue bleeding the state dry and allowing it to languish, I hope Brandon Presley beats Reeves; at least Presley seems like a decent guy. If this does not force the GOP back to the negotiation table with populist blue-collar voters, especially given the state’s political backstabbing since the 1990s regarding Ole Miss’ rebel flag issue, abortion, gay marriage, immigration, the job market, land prices, the anti-Southern education curriculum, selling out to big business and the SEC, and the state flag, nothing else will.

The post The Landmass Times: Populism is Dead appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The United States military is a product. That is something that is hard for Baby Boomers and most GenXers to comprehend, because they see the military as a constitutionally enshrined (and constricted) governmental service. That is a legacy of a pre-volunteer military mindset coupled with 1980s nostalgia. While it is true – the military’s core function is supposed to be the defense of these United States – the “employee body” is comprised of young volunteers and it requires a fresh crop of recruits annually to survive in its present form. Correspondingly, this places the military into a unique position of competing with alternatives for that said crop of recruits. In essence, the Department of Defense must find ways to make itself the more appealing alternative to its top competitor – universities. In this regard, U.S. military recruitment is like any other product as it pertains to marketing and advertising.

To remain relevant, the military must continue to attract “consumers”: impressionable 18 – 24-year-old young adults, primarily males. It is failing. This is an incredible opportunity for our movement.

The purpose of this article is not intended to help the U.S. military. It is intended to further exacerbate that failure. Our most important mission is to break a degenerate United States in half, such that a Free and Independent Dixie can arise from the ashes of that former empire. To do so, the easiest way we can target and accelerate the collapse of the U.S. is through exploiting the option likely to have the greatest impact on the current regime in power. Devastating military recruitment is the most readily available, legal opportunity presented to us.

A core component of the failing ability of the U.S. military to recruit in the 21st Century is that the U.S. military has a marketing problem. That is not to say that it has an advertising problem – in business sciences, the two are separate disciplines. The core of marketing is data collection and subsequent quantitative analysis related to consumer insight. The result of those analytics should dictate the methods used to attract consumers (e.g., advertisements, promotions, etc.). Whether or not the military understands that which drives its consumer is debatable. Regardless, it is clear that even if the military rank and file within the recruiting commands of the various services understand what helps and harms recruitment, the policy directives of both civilian and senior military leadership within the Department of Defense run in direct opposition to the needs of recruitment.

Although they will never admit it, the fact is, the U.S. military has become a social justice petri dish. That is not unique to Presidents Obama or Biden. Many of the social justice elements that are deeply interwoven into the modern military’s operating culture went into hyperdrive throughout a Trump Administration that never really understood the nature of a military brass that simply ignored Trump’s sporadic civilian leaders and ham-fisted approach to policy. That which senior leaders liked, they embraced. That which senior leaders did not like, they placed on the back burner – betting there would be no second term for the Trump Administration. The cumulative result will be sixteen years of a constant leftwing orbital shift that is way out of touch with ordinary Americans. For recruiting commands that have no power over strategic policy, they have been forced to attempt to override a damaged brand reputation with greater incentives, such as more money for college and/or larger recruitment bonuses. Decades of marketing research, however, has proven that incentives do not work when the brand’s reputation is damaged, and the damage is not addressed. In effect, you can offer coupons for free cheeseburgers, but if the reputation of those cheeseburgers is that they give the consumer E.coli, and no one has addressed the E.coli issue, then the coupons will go unused. This is especially true if there are alternatives to be had, a lesson that Bud Light learned. For the military, the alternative is often college.

In an environment whereby student loans are easily obtained and there are no consequences to non-payment of those loans (except a bad credit score), the U.S. military has had to find other ways to inspire voluntary enrollment. After all, one of the key benefits of joining the military was a “free” or significantly subsidized college education. From the G.I. Bill to the Army College Fund to various state university programs that offer free veteran education, joining the military was a way in which lower-to-middle income children could advance their socioeconomic status through higher education. With subsidized loans and the perennial promise of some kind of mass student debt forgiveness, the higher education benefit simply does not have the same appeal it had in the 1950s – 1990s. That makes one coupon down.

The alternative to the military higher education message was that of “job skills.” It is not an accident that the elimination of technical education programs in the United States occurred at about the same time as the introduction of the all-volunteer military. The military-industrial complex is its own beast with its own needs. Never underestimate the power of self-serving interests, even when those interests dovetail with the interests of other actors or elements.

Returning to the topic, if you were an early twenty-something who joined the military with a reasonable Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) test score, you could learn a number of lifelong, professional skills, such as data entry, plumbing, electrical work, aircraft maintenance, etc. Forgoing college and joining the military provided an opportunity for the less academically inclined to emerge with a career or journeyman status within the trades. Better yet, such a tradesman had the potential to exit the Army with a significant bonus and no student debt – placing him financially well ahead of his peers. However, the messaging of the military has largely moved away from its previous blue-collar marketing for a number of reasons, but the short answer is presumed interests. Young people do not seem particularly interested in learning “dirty” labor skills. Thus, another coupon down.

Finally, one of the key drivers of military recruitment was an appeal to patriotism. This was the bread and butter of the military for decades. Impressionable young men – especially Southern White men – were driven to join a military that they saw as honorable. They joined to defend the Constitution and these United States. To these young men, who often derived from families comprised of an enlisted lineage, the pinnacle of their lives was their willingness to die in battle to defend against enemies foreign and domestic. But patriotism is not that cool anymore for a myriad of reasons. Unlike the incentive gimmicks of college funds and signing bonuses, this driver is not an incentive built by recruiting commands, but one that is built from within a broader society. Not only is that crumbling outside of the military, but senior level policy makers have also targeted those few who would likely join the U.S. military for patriotic reasons.

Potential black recruits have been fed a steady diet of anti-American vitriol for the last five decades. It has gone into hyper-drive since the emergence of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement approximately ten years ago. Everything about the United States has been portrayed as an outgrowth of White supremacy and the protection of those institutions and principles – to include the Constitution – are now seen as elements of systemic White imperialism or reactive fragility. Why would anyone volunteer to join a military designed to perpetuate their oppression? Even more importantly, why would anyone join a military whereby the black leaders within the military have complained that the institution is racist to the point whereby they felt personal harm? After all, if the racist military can impede the promotion of an educated officer (soon to be the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs), how can a young black male with a high school diploma expect to receive fair treatment? The cumulative impact of anti-American, social justice rhetoric amplified by messaging from senior military officers of color will suppress recruitment.

More importantly, however, is the cumulative impact of anti-White and anti-Christian rhetoric from the United States government, media, academia, and elected political leaders. Non-Hispanic, black citizens account for approximately 12% of the population, and they are shrinking rapidly as a demographic cohort. The recruitment demographic that is most critical to U.S. military recruitment is the much larger pool of White teenagers and early-twenty-somethings. At present, Non-Hispanic Whites constitute approximately 65% of the total American population. That, too, is shrinking rapidly. Still, nearly 56% of potential recruits are Non-Hispanic Whites and the vitriol levied against them has divorced them from a United States that not only openly hates them for being White, but they are also no longer actively recruited.

If you look at current recruitment content, the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) push has effectively forced White males out of recruiting content. There is almost no representation of young White males in advertisements any longer. Long gone are the Marine Corps videos of “The Few. The Proud. The Marines.” Rather, Marine Corps recruiting attempted to embrace popular terminology of the political Right by appealing to “nation,” while depicting everyone other than Whites as part of that nation. The messaging from the United States military has been crystal clear: we do not want White recruits. Unironically, groups like “Patriot Front” have done a far better job enticing White teenagers to equate patriotism and nation to race versus the military’s ham-fisted attempts at DEI inspired anti-racist/anti-White marketing strategies centering “nation” as a post-White America.

The military’s anti-White shift in advertising may have been justified if the military still had White veterans imploring their White children to join the military. That is no longer happening. Veterans are not only far more conservative as a group (that may change in the future), but they are also statistically more politically engaged then the average American. Consequently, while average American citizens may be less likely to notice the definitively anti-White vitriol of the modern military, White veterans are speaking openly about Critical Race Theory (CRT) and the politically weaponized Covid vaccine to their children. This is all having a suppressing effect on recruitment potential.

The cumulative impact of the American recruiting landscape is further exacerbated by a U.S. military that spends a lot of money on urban marketing professionals to assist its recruiting endeavors. Contrary to popular beliefs, the vast majority of military service members are not country boys. While it is true, there are disproportionately more rural and exurban recruits then urban ones due to sheer volume (i.e., there are less rural citizens then urban ones), the happy hunting ground of American military recruiting is found in the suburban pockets that surround larger cities, especially in the South and Midwest. The U.S. military needs successful marketing campaigns that target the suburbs of Cleveland, Dallas, St. Louis, and Nashville. The problem is that most of the major marketing firms have very little insight into these markets. They are generally geared toward nationalized campaigns with a high focus on urban and major market (i.e., Los Angeles, New York, Chicago) consumption. That is a problem for the U.S. military, but it gets worse.

At the exact same time that urban based marketing professionals are guiding military advertising to achieve recruitment goals, the U.S. military is engaged in a massive social justice experiment. Even if the social justice experiment is minimal, it does not matter. It has an immediate impact on perception because social justice initiatives are inherently unstoppable and always have a snowball-avalanche effect. If the military is embracing CRT – which it is – this will only reinforce the importance of social justice marketing to their service providers – the advertising community – who will seek marketing biases to justify advertising campaigns that comport with the views of decision makers. In other words, if senior military leaders want confirmation bias in marketing data, marketing professionals will give them confirmation bias. The snowball (i.e., policy du jour) is compounded by more snow added to the snowball (i.e., manufactured marketing data), until such time that the messaging begins to accumulate an out of control, unsustainable messaging campaign that wrecks its target market like an avalanche. Here is where this gets great for us.

Despite mountains of anecdotal assertions that Generation Z (born between 1997 – 2012) are the most liberal demographic cohort in generations, polling data has shown something very different. Whereas it is true, the generation is more broadly left of center, that is because females are overrepresented in almost every poll that has been conducted. When “Zoomer” males are polled and analyzed, they turn out to be one of the most hard-right generations ever analyzed. In effect, females are becoming more leftwing, males are becoming more rightwing. We can delve into the reasons why young males are becoming more rightwing, but that will have to be a topic for another article. More important is how this impacts U.S. military recruitment because it exemplifies the cumulative impact of leftwing policy decisions on recruiting and gives our movement incredible opportunities.

Policy makers will often encourage the promotion of DEI pronouncements and excuse these promotions as part of some cool attempt to connect with young Americans. The problem is that they are not connecting with young Americans. They are much like the old guy trying to be hip. They are actually pushing them away. A case in point would be the horribly mocked cartoon commercial of a young female Army recruit with two lesbian mothers out of San Francisco. Mocking did not originate from GenXers (the other hard-right demographic that happens to be the parents of GenZers). Mocking originated from Zoomers who found the commercial cringy and pathetic. Within minutes of release, the ridiculously leftist cultural mishmash was compared to Chinese and Russian recruitment videos featuring hardened men training constantly. Even if the military put out more inspiring promotional material, no one remembers those commercials. They remember the woke social justice warrior recruit who is now a junior NCO impacting promotion decisions.

Demographic and generational voting trends provide even more unique data because they show a hardening along fault lines. One comprehensive data set on GenZ voting was conducted by Murmuration, with contributions from SocialSphere and The Walton Family Foundation. The data set, conducted in December 2022 shortly after the midterm election, showed a sharp division built into the data. The number of Evangelical Christians rose among GenZers, while mainstream Protestantism fell. As a whole, however, faith did not take that much of a dip overall. It dropped four percentage points as a self-identifier, which is not nearly as precipitous a drop as anecdotally reported in mainstream media outlets. More striking was the fact that 75% of GenZers considered faith as “Very Important” or “Somewhat Important” to their own life. That was nearly identical to adults over the age of 26, who stated it was 77% very or somewhat important. Noting that GenZ is young and people tend to grow more religious as they get older, this is indicative of a generation that is more conservative than thought. But it gets better for the Dissident Right.

Sexual identification has clearly changed. Only 75% of respondents claimed to be heterosexual versus 92% of older cohort respondents. The largest difference was in the self-identified “bisexual” category, that rose 300% (from 3% to 9%). Self-identified “gays” accounted for only 2% and lesbians stayed at 1%. The vast majority who did not identify as heterosexual answered, “None of the Above,” “I Don’t Know,” “Prefer Not to Say,” or “Refused.” The largest overall category increase was a sexual self-identifier entitled “queer” – of which 4% claimed some label within a catchall category that ran a broad gamut from so-called pansexual to asexual. In other words, the Far Right incel who has never had sex could easily find himself in a sexual category that is lionized by the political Left. The reason this is important is because modern identitarian discourse has tried to weaponize sexuality as a tool for political exploitation. The U.S. military has embraced this whole heartedly, as evidenced by their over-the-top promotion of LGBT propaganda during so-called Pride Month. What this study tells me is something very different. Generation Z – the U.S. military’s core recruitment demographic – is hardening on one side of the political spectrum or the other, while the increasingly smaller middle is refusing to give a clue as to how they feel about certain societal topics.

The beauty of this kind of research is that it enables the Dissident Right, and especially Southern Nationalists, to target the elements of GenZ that are more likely to be inclined toward military recruitment in ways that make military recruitment undesirable for the hardening 50% of GenZ. In essence, we do not have to worry about transgenders, homosexuals, or left leaning females – all of which the major recruiting commands are required by force of policy to concentrate upon. With the exception of leftwing females, the outlier population cohorts are not growing to any meaningful effect. They are certainly not growing at replacement levels whereby the military can offset heterosexual White Christian males with sexually amorphous atheists. We can focus on the majority of potential recruitment pools while recruitment commands are forced to concentrate on minority pockets of the population.

More importantly, the other larger recruitment pools – such as Hispanic or black males – may not appreciate being tied to the sexually amorphous atheists that the military is now required to elevate. Whereas recent racially motivated cultural antagonisms have them hating White males, that does not mean young black males will be drawn to a military that is pro-homosexual simply because it deters White males. The same can be said for Hispanics.

We simply need to focus our messaging like a laser beam on two groups: GenZ White Christian males and GenX veterans. Our strategy should hyper-inflate perceptions that the military is anti-Christian, anti-White, and homosexual. While these are substantive facts – the military is anti-Christian, anti-White, and disproportionately homosexual – these need to be the three most important elements of social media engagement. Memes, videos, and other entertaining methods of engagement should serve to educate GenZ on various anti-White and pro-LGBT military initiatives. They need to be truthful, deriving messaging from actual military policy. In this regard, recruitment commands cannot compete with our ability to remain nimble and factual with our communications objectives.

Meanwhile, for Generation X veterans – the various recruiting commands’ force multiplier within the population – the message has to power down on the fact that this is “not Reagan’s military anymore.” The most important message to GenX veterans is the following: Do you know the consequences of a dishonorable discharge? Do you really want your White Christian son to join a U.S. military in which he can find himself with a dishonorable discharge on the basis of an accusation of racism, sexism, genderism? Even if he escapes that fate – what are his chances for promotion in a military that now embraces Critical Race Theory as the core of its senior leadership operating culture? By appealing to both the nostalgia of GenX for a once pro-American society, as well as its sacrosanct belief in meritocracy over “equity,” we can dismantle the desire of veterans to promote military service to their sons. This gets more poignant when we consider the myriad of anti-Southern initiatives led by the current U.S. military.

In an environment whereby the U.S. military is renaming bases and tearing down monuments to Southerners – to include peace monuments at cemeteries – one simply needs to hammer home the innate animosity toward Southerners held by the current Department of Defense. Ask the following of a GenX veteran from the South: Do you honestly believe that your son with a Southern drawl will get a fair shake in a military that today openly hates Southerners and the South? The minute he says, “y’all,” he is a marked man. Again, appealing to nostalgia, meritocracy, and in this case, indignation, has to be the core of our messaging aimed at GenX.

This is a golden opportunity for Southern Nationalists. Military recruitment continues to fall year-over-year. Senior military leadership and civilian policy makers are incapable of looking beyond their ideological blinders to address perceptions of anti-White bias. The recruiting commands are powerless. They are forced to work within the restrictive confines of policies made outside of their control. Marketing companies that serve the military are simply doing their best to keep a client, reinforcing policy biases with disastrous recruiting results.

The U.S. military is on the ropes – ropes of their own making. It is time we do in 2024 what we were not able to do in 1865: finish them.

The post Devastating Military Recruitment in 2024 appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Years ago, I was the right-hand man for my company’s CEO. He was anxious for construction to be completed on a certain facility, as our previous one had unfortunately been subjected to a terrorist attack from which I was lucky to have just barely escaped. The work was lagging, so he dispatched me to deal with the project manager (PM).

When I showed up onsite, the PM seemed very nervous and attempted flattery. I curtly instructed him to dispense with the pleasantries, because I was there to put him back on schedule. He assured me that his personnel were working as fast as possible. I was immediately skeptical and speculated that I could find new ways to motivate them.

He again reassured me that things would be finished on time. I explained that our CEO didn’t share his optimistic appraisal of the situation. The PM implored me that he was being asked of the impossible and he needed to hire more workers. A frank admission, finally. My reply was that perhaps he could tell our CEO when he arrived onsite.

A look of fear flashed across his face, and he inquired if this was really the case. That was correct, I told him and furthermore, our CEO was most displeased at his apparent lack of progress. He promised to redouble their efforts. In a moment of candor, I remarked that I hoped this was true for his sake because our CEO wasn’t as forgiving as myself.

If there’s anything I learned from my time with this company, it was that fear is quite a useful tool and one that becomes of particular utility once the good times are gone. So, yeah, I’d say our government is going to be attempting to instill lots of fear in the near future. Here’s what it’s facing in 2024:

• Comprehensive, catastrophic military defeat in Ukraine
• Mass unrest in Europe
• The continued toll of a black America gone feral
• The effects of mass migration that it doesn’t seem willing or able to even slow down
• Having to lock up the former president and steal another election
• Inflation and a consumer debt crisis
• Unaffordable home ownership
• Boomers retiring into systems that aren’t funded to last the remainder of their average life expectancies

Also, the economy isn’t looking too swell, either. It’s therefore not surprising that there does seem to be groundwork being laid for another round of insane COVID dystopia. The timing would appear to be right as COVID hit us in the winter of 2020 but much of the financial measures introduced had been fleshed out in Sun Valley, Idaho the previous summer and then Event 201 to rehearse a virus response was conducted in NYC that October.

So, if we’re going to be subjected to this again it would make sense that we’re beginning to hear the rumblings right about now. It’s not exactly a fringe notion that something big and bad is going to have to happen in order to control the public. Tucker Carlson’s theory is that both a Trump assassination and a war with Russia are incoming.

Tucker Carlson predicts Deep State will try to KILL Trump: "We are speeding towards assassination obviously."

pic.twitter.com/g0tVLXKpvJ

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) August 31, 2023

Carlson might be right, since we’re talking about the machinations of people who are evil, insane, and incompetent all at the same time. They’ve put themselves in a position where the status quo can’t be sustained, and the public will be very upset with how this impacts the average citizen’s life. As I said, it’s becoming pretty well-accepted that there will be a need for them to do something to keep us under wraps as things are done to us that we’re really not going to like and the whole democracy veneer is pulled away.

Even Putin pointed out in a speech at the beginning of this year that our string pullers would have to pull something big eventually as an excuse for resetting the system and named war as one of their options. However, let me try and speculate from a rational perspective.

If one proceeds from the premise that they’re not totally incompetent, a direct confrontation with Russia can be ruled out since we don’t have the conventional assets to prevail or even the industrial capacity to sustain a conflict for long. Ukraine has been a very ugly lesson that would be hard to ignore.

Moreover, most of Russia’s assets are safely inside of Russia whereas the Russians would have a wealth of targets to hit with missiles, which the current conflict has demonstrated that we won’t be able to intercept. There’s also the sizable probability that this would escalate into a general conflagration.

So, as a justification for introducing more domestic tyranny as a solution for the inability to sustain American expectations about quality of life, a losing conflict that can’t be contained doesn’t appear to be a great option. Again, there remains a decent chance it could happen though.

Rebranding COVID as some new nightmare seems much more feasible, seeing as it worked once before. Less people are going to be on board with the insanity this time around, but many are incorrigible. The first pandemic functioned as a proof of concept. Remember, everyone from Bill Gates to Biden kept telling us that COVID would just be the first pandemic.

They tell us they’re going to do things, and then they do these things. They’ve been talking about a great reset, but nothing has really been reset. When is that going to happen, and what does that specifically entail? If they’re willing to shut the world down and inject everyone with unlimited experimental gene therapy over fraud, I wouldn’t put anything past them. This why I’ve spent the last three years decrying Satanism and I never did in all my years of writing before it happened.

We can’t rule out the government repeating something that turned out poorly in the past and trying to do this same stupid thing bigger and better. In fact, I’d say it has a rather solid track record at doubling down on stupid. Take discriminating against White men or these foreign wars, for example.

I think the question of what’s going to happen in 2024 essentially boils down to fear. If they estimate that they’ll be able to scare enough people to comply with another round of pandemic bullshit, then that’s what they’ll try to impose. If it’s not war or a pandemic, what else would they do? UFOs?

I just don’t think they can scare enough Americans with the threat of getting abducted and rectally probed by aliens. My money is on pandemic round two, and I really doubt it’s going to be anywhere as fun as getting checks for nothing and staying home to send emails instead of working.

The post Fear is a Tool appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I have been chewing on this one for a while. It may be easy for you, the reader, to believe I am pushing a black pilled message. I am not but am simply describing thoughts and observations I have made. Not only have I witnessed numerous alarming trends taking place across Heritage America, due largely to the influence of social media, but I cannot address it without calling out and harshly criticizing a certain demographic within Caucasian circles. With that said, let us begin.

I find it impossible not to notice the astonishing and inordinate influence TikTok has on Millennials and Gen Z. It far exceeds the success of any social engineering attempted by generations of film, news, and education in years passed. Every single social trend and push comes from that damnable app nowadays, and Facebook and YouTube have begun incorporating TikTok-style videos on their platforms. It is inescapable.

I have observed that TikTok has been pushing miscegenation heavily over the past few years. Whereas I do not have the app myself, it is difficult not to see videos from that app posted all over YouTube and social media outlets. From Manosphere videos on YouTube commenting on the depraved state of modern American women to random videos to funny gym skits, I have noticed what appears to be a heretofore unseen spike in White female/black male couples. Most of these videos I come across have this trait. Furthermore, many videos, even if not that specific pairing, have a mixed couple of one sort or another. This seems to have taken over TikTok what feels like overnight about a year ago, two at most, and has expanded to other platforms adopting these style videos. In fact, it is so common and was so instantaneous that I am beginning to wonder if these are not simply paid actors. Ever since TikTok started doing this nonchalantly, I have witnessed a huge real-world spike in miscegenation among Millennials and Gen Z, alongside an assortment of other annoying and obnoxious social traits. The demographic I am noticing the most striking change in their breeding patterns as a result of this is, of course, White females. It is actually quite astonishing, even for someone as jaded and disillusioned as myself. I suppose it caught me off guard because generations of this propaganda did not have this level of an effect, and these are supposed to be videos everyday people make themselves, kind of like Vine was but way more cringe and sexualized. Not all that long ago, White women were the least likely group to miscegenate.

Before delving any further into the female capitulation and support of race-mixing and anti-Whiteism, I will first briefly mention the negative effects of race-mixing. There is quite a good amount of evidence to suggest miscegenation is a grievously dysgenic breeding practice to adopt, despite the fact that findings will forever and always be suppressed by the mainstream. From bone marrow transplant issues, to fatherlessness, to emergent genetic deficiencies, to rootlessness and identity crises among the mixed children, to sickle cell anemia, the negative impact is staggering. One of the best essays on the topic with an absurd amount of data is “The War on Whites in Advertising” on Counter-Currents. I cannot recommend it enough. Furthermore, American Renaissance also has an excellent essay on the subject. Links will be posted at the end of this article.

To provide some final thoughts on the breeding and mixing topic, the Holy Bible has some things to say, or imply, on the matter, just read the Old Testament, the passage about the Tower of Babel, Jesus’ and Paul’s own views on who they chose to preach to, Acts 17:26, Zechariah 9:6, and Genesis 10:5, just to give a few examples. Take a look at Latin America, the Middle East, or your average American mulatto today. According to Dan Roodt, an Afrikaner and author of Raiders of the Lost Empire: South Africa’s ‘English’ Identity which is reviewed and discussed on AmRen, the creolized Coloureds have arguably the worst substance abuse and existential issues of all the South African races. Lastly on the subject, dysgenic breeding even within just White couples, from my observation, appears to have run rampant since about the 1990s as it seems like everyone born during and since is remarkably uglier than their forebears. The physiognomy of many born after 1990 is incredibly bizarre, if not outright uncanny. Take a look around and tell me you do not see it.

The following is an excerpt from that aforementioned Counter-Currents essay. All is not as it seems.

“A 2017 study in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology looked at insula activity in the brain when participants viewed images of interracial couples compared to same-race couples. Insula activation is responsible for a variety of emotions. Evidence shows that insula activity is present when a person experiences disgust and is thought to be a reliable marker of both disgust and aversion. The study found statistical significance between insula activation of participants looking at same-race couples compared to interracial couples. Despite a minority of participants explicitly stating they disagree with interracial dating and marriage, the electroencephalogram (EEG), told a different story.

This study also used an implicit association task (IAT) to measure response times of participants in categorizing interracial couples and same-race couples with either a silhouette of a human or a silhouette of an animal. Participants were placed in two conditions, one primed with disgusting images, the other with positive images. Researchers found that all participants showed an implicit bias towards matching interracial couples with animals, and the condition primed to be disgusted was even faster, showing a greater implicit bias against interracial couples. There was both a neural reaction of disgust and an implicit reaction of disgust, to interracial couples. The authors write in the abstract of this paper that ‘These findings are particularly concerning, given evidence of antisocial reactions (e.g., aggression, perpetration of violence) to dehumanized targets.’

Before I continue, I would like to address that I am not referring to every single Caucasian female ever and everywhere at all times on planet Earth, so bring those absurd NAXALT arguments and accusations elsewhere. White female capitulation is something everybody sees and notices. It is no secret. We can all clearly see that White females, typically of Millennial and Gen Z extract, are the loudest mouthpieces of the current American anti-White male propaganda created by the Left. We can also see that many of these females are from suburban and/or affluent, middle-class backgrounds. Everybody can very obviously and clearly see that the White girls have heavily embraced rootlessness, promiscuity, and melanin chasing as a standard practice. I have yet to meet a single dude who has anything good to say about young White females, as a whole, due to the previously stated and the spoiled, degenerate behavior the average White girl exhibits now. The behavior of these girls is so awful that White males are now very noticeably beginning to date black women in increasing numbers, something once very uncommon and compounded with the increasing pursuit of Hispanic and Oriental women. White men seem openly resentful of White women these days.

This is not a positive development for Caucasian women in America. It is unwise to alienate and turn against the one and only demographic to historically protect them and keep them safe. Each and every scenario in which White males are not around ends badly for the women. Take a gander at every major American city, South Africa, immigrant filled European cities, and the Barbery Slave Trade to name a few. Furthermore, we all know that a lot of their current behavior, aside from lust and no impulse control because of a lack of strong fathers, is a result of pursuing what is perceived methods of increasing their social credit scores. In reality, the Left hates White women, too. A cursory search of Google and YouTube will reveal the American Left’s true feelings about White women. Considering murder and rape rates of White women today and historically from a demographic perspective, it is no surprise to know how the Left really feels. It is not a good idea to side with those who hate your existence. Good luck.

Look, I know this is just a rambling stream of consciousness about observations I have made, and I hate to come off as black pilling and have no intention of doing so. However, we cannot deny reality in front of us. If trends continue the way they are, non-Slavic Caucasians will be all but extinct in 100 years, and pure blood North European stock in the U.S. will not exist 200 years from now, much less in Northern Europe itself.

Some articles on the negatives of miscegenation and the White girl discussion:

https://www.amren.com/commentary/2020/07/white-women-are-in-an-abusive-relationship-with-the-left/

https://www.amren.com/commentary/2018/10/the-left-now-hates-white-women/

https://counter-currents.com/2018/03/the-war-against-whites-in-advertising/

https://www.amren.com/commentary/2021/06/race-mixing-miscegenation-advertising/

https://www.amren.com/features/2023/07/are-we-doomed/

https://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993074,00.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

https://www.nber.org/papers/w14192

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15994621/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/

The post Miscegenation Accelerant appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

A major feature of the establishment propaganda about how Russia is suffering a devastating loss to NATO in Ukraine is that domestically, Russia is falling apart. This is based on the situation in the 1990s before Putin took the helm at the behest of Yeltsin, who’d gone from hero to a drunkard with a weak grip on power.

I remember watching this on television and wondering who the hell Vladimir Putin was, he didn’t have the vibe or look of a Western politician and seemed to have come out of nowhere. Of course, this wasn’t the case. He was at the helm of an apparatus but that wasn’t clear from what you could glean by consuming Western media.

Despite his shortcomings, Yeltsin had come to realize what the oligarchs were aiming to steal, which was the government itself, and stepped down in favor of Putin. At least that’s disseminated as the official narrative. Putin might’ve told him that his time was up.

Putin managed to right the ship using the power of the security state, known as the Siloviki, to deal with the oligarchs who’d been looting the country in collusion with their fellow parasites from abroad. They had the capital and the schemes to swipe everything for pennies on the dollar whereas the average Russian was bewildered by the privatization and “shock therapy” process introduced by the parasites. Most of these oligarchs managed to flee. Some, notably Mikhail Khodorkovsky, fared far worse, much to the wailing of his tribe in the Western media.

Oh no! The rule of law!!!! Oh gawd, where’s my yamika?That was something I really enjoyed and when I first realized that Putin was more than met the eye. You have to understand that the notion of a strongman coming to power and locking up billionaire parasites terrifies parasites exponentially more than it delights someone like myself. Mustache Man did it to a Rothschild, don’t forget. Parasites tend to sense the warning signs much better than ourselves. Their collective freak out over the tenor of modern America should provide us with a glimmer of hope, not that much of a glimmer, but still.

So, Khodorkovsky went from Russia’s wealthiest man to solitary confinement in a Siberian gulag. A key part of the Russian collapse narrative is also that these oligarchs will overthrow Putin when they get tired of his failing war effort, but this isn’t twenty years ago. Any who might’ve possessed that level of wealth and influence are long gone, what’s left are those whom Putin tolerates or sometimes humiliates for political clout. The Siloviki are in firm control of Russia and the likelihood is that Putin’s Silovik successor will be considerably less restrained.

Trump tried this sort of maneuver with a Carrier plant in Indianapolis, but it was much more gentle. Putin didn’t come into office announcing his intention to take the oligarchs out. At first, he appeared quite cooperative because had to do so. This is the great fear of their ethnoreligious hate/swindling organization: having an absolute leader who decides to turn on them one day. Stalin pulled the same maneuver, as did many European sovereigns over the centuries.

This why our human rights and freedom democracy model is violently exported everywhere. Let’s just be real: if the parasites are constantly extolling the virtues of something, that’s because they’re using it to fuck us over. This democracy system by its nature can’t express our will or address our needs because they own all the politicians.

Sure, it works for my HOA, but it can’t for America. Russia also has a democracy where people vote but there’s a system of power that’s not up for a vote. It’s the same thing here except that ordinary Russians are getting things that they want accomplished. I don’t bother voting; I just want and need certain things from our government. When you point this out, people look at you like you want Emperor Palpatine to run the place.

Parasites own and screen everyone who comes up through our system that they hijacked, and no one figure has enough authority to get rid of them if he somehow decided to do it. Trump was the sole exception as far as getting past the screening. He wasn’t even against the parasites. His children are all married into their tribe, he was largely powerless in office, and look at what they’re doing. Trump even gave Netanyahu a golden key to the White House. Originally, communism was supposed to do the trick across the globe that our system is attempting to perform but things didn’t work out so well. It won’t with our system either, but that never fails to deter their evil ambitions.

Check out our billboard in Times Square: pic.twitter.com/7rUlBROD3d

— Republican Accountability (@AccountableGOP) August 31, 2023

It’d be an understatement to say that things in Russia have drastically improved since the 90s but nobody important in the West seems to take this into consideration. They can’t seem to change their frame of reference from Russia is on the brink decades ago to modern Russia, it’s really quite insane. American military officers I’ve talked with seem to think they’re fighting with junk equipment leftover from the Cold War.

One question that immediately comes to mind is that if Russia has been about to collapse for the past 30 years, why hasn’t it happened yet? The same narrative is applied to the military operation in Ukraine. That was supposed to fall apart within a week, it didn’t. So why is it still supposed to happen any day now? Critical thinking isn’t something that experts perform anymore.

If Russia managed to hold together through a famine where, thanks to parasitical schemes, agricultural production fell by half at one point, two civil wars instigated by the CIA in the Caucasus using proto-Al Qaeda types when garrisoned soldiers were forced to beg for food on the streets, years when police and many other workers never got paid, etc, etc, etc, why would it fall apart now? Russia’s current leadership already proved it could hold things together through the most tenuous and desperate of times.

My contention is that the United States has a much better chance of falling apart than the Russian Federation, a resource autarkic nation that never exported its manufacturing base. It’s led by a stable government with broad public support which is meticulous about its debts. They’re not turning kids into trannies, all that evil is banned. They’re not convulsed by race riots; this happens in the USA. Their minorities are allowed to practice their cultures and religions in autonomy.

Thus far, Russia might’ve suffered as high as 50,000 KIA in Ukraine. Is anybody taking to the streets or is the public committed to victory? Could we lost 50,000 soldiers? All we can do in the U.S. is adjust the narratives, not fix the problems. In fact, all the problems are getting much worse. Can you name a single one we’re fixing? I sure can’t. As with many of the accusations parasites make, Russian collapse is a matter of projection.

Carlson believes Russia is "a Christian country." His defense of Russia is appalling. But his slander of Christianity is also deplorable. Is Putin's Russia really an exemplar of Christianity today? Surely every decent Christian–every friend of Christianity–rejects this. https://t.co/xcU2XbIF54

— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) August 27, 2023

A murderer of Christ is a friend of Christianity. Imagine living life without hypocrisy as a relevant concept. The post Uncle Sam, Take a Look in the Mirror appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Old men observe and imagine the fate of the “country,” one that was once a relatively free group of independent states of people living freely within tribal nests of local-style Jeffersonian parlors of home and family; people who loved the land and the God who provided it.

Some old men have such observations.

Now in time, much past, as the fortunes of that land fell well over a century and a half ago, via the national army that issued from its political New England seed. Its Hamiltonian nationalists and its Lincolnite European revolutionists, who unsparingly shed blood to create the single national state that was to be worshiped like Satan, he supposedly of beautiful sight, whose “son-of the morning” stature would be the state’s greatest flesh-taster.

Today, corruption runs like a social disease, decaying the once masculine union through its lovemaking with its national concubine, Washington, D.C. It runs like disease and evil once ran through Sodom and Gomorrah 4,000 years ago.

Its seductive rot consumes and will continue. Truths will not be told about it, and truth is the only elixir for lies.

Political parties are but political pimps and are the buyers and sellers of debt and pleasurable flesh using the sweat and brow of the taxpayers and their once-protected wealth, protected by the honorable union.

Liars are the breeding ground of corruption or corruption necessarily breeds lying. In either case, the contrapositive is true for either, so would say logicians via their truth tables i.e., integrity breeds truth or truth breeds integrity.

Old men who once were told myths in honor of the reputation of great and honorable men like George Washington (the cherry tree story) whose honor was so solid that he would not, could not, tell a lie, listen today to so-called journalists support the absence of truth.

Irony thy father is damnation when you have fixed yourself onto the city, Washington D.C., and subsumed the paradox that the first president’s name is affixed to the city where the greatest lies in size and number flow like some kind of verbal mendacious distributary of the Potomac.

The blood, shed in such fields of the Union of “states united,” not united states, became like dark milk feeding the faux-beautiful son of the morning, like some national vampire, and being the ignition for the so-called shining light on the hill, the great lie of the puritanical “John Cheese” Yankee. Satan and his criers, the nationalists, became the corrupter and killer of union and the father of state. Satan’s fairy-tale lie: some damn light on a hill, shining – but only lighting the beast of bureaucracy.

Today, the battle is over. There is, contrary to well-duped conservative people, no victory in sight. The well-duped are also the untutored, unread, (ironically, many call themselves Republicans, though hardly republican, they are state nationalists)

Most are clothed with crafty and cunning devices that worship such political poison; poison which truly believes rendering to Caesar is not just God’s true way, but Satan’s only way.

The beasts are running through the streets and own the courts, own the representatives, own what remain of the police, own the army, and own the money. And they protect it with guns that the people pay for but resist the people owning the same. The mystery is: how have these “duped” been duped?

Pimps always promise the duped the same: protection and security. But now it is too late. There is not enough political penicillin to save the concubine. The people most likely will die with the concubine.

Today, Washington owns the people, their states, their lives, its fortunes and has replaced all honor with some nonsensical rubbish labeled “Woke.”

Some of these same old men once passed in review on graduation day at Parris Island, South Carolina. The flag was raised on the replica of Mount Suribachi and as they passed the colors, the band’s brass resounding “The Marine Corps Hymn,” they felt special at having been trained by honorable officers and NCOs, both disproportionately Southern. Today, it is a lie to suggest anything “honorable” is part of Washington’s or its military officers or any of its DNA’s structure.

Richmond, Virginia once fought to preserve the concept of “union.” Washington, D.C. fought to create (today’s) “nation.”

Richmond died with honor. Washington survived as a political whore.

Believe it or not, there are still supporters in gray cloth down in Dixie who, still, unarmed, but reverently, say: Deo Vindice and always stand or salute “The Star Spangle Banner” though not some National Anthem.

Seldom are they allowed to say so in print. But almost every dang one of them will say, printed or not: “MAGA.”

Deo Vindice, America. Especially, Southern America.

-By Paul H. Yarbrough

The post Old Men and Honor appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In a time of increasing skepticism of globalization, stemming from losses in jobs, cultural heritage, and sovereignty over ones own homeland, nationalism has re-emerged onto the political stage in protest movements and increasingly populist governments. Christian nationalism, focused on the incorporation of church doctrine into a nation and often a sovereign, is not a new concept, stemming at least from the time of the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648, but recently has re-emerged as a potential solution to the social ills many societies face in the West. Tonight we are joined by Woe, co-host of the Stone Choir podcast, to make the case for how and why this might be a good way forward for many of the discontented souls of today.

— Brought to you by —

Very special guest Woe @treblewoe

Stone Choir Podcast

— References —

– Industrial Society and Its Future, Kaczynski (1995)

– Uncle Ted’s Cabin, Myth of the 20th Century (2017) – https://myth20c.wordpress.com/2017/10/18/uncle-teds-cabin/

– E. Michael Jones – Cultural Revolution in America, Myth of the 20th Century (2018) – https://myth20c.wordpress.com/2018/05/02/e-michael-jones-cultural-revolution-in-america/

– Christian Nationalism Is Submission to God, Stone Choir (2022) – https://stone-choir.com/christian-nationalism-is-submission-to-god/

– Election in View of Headship, Stone Choir (2022) – https://stone-choir.com/election-in-view-of-headship/

– On Human Race: IQ, Stone Choir (2023) – https://stone-choir.com/on-human-race-iq/

– On Human Race: Racism, Stone Choir (2023) – https://stone-choir.com/on-human-race-racism/

– Hebrews, Israelites, and Jews, Stone Choir (2023) – https://stone-choir.com/hebrews-israelites-and-jews/

– Judge (Not), Stone Choir (2023) – https://stone-choir.com/judge-not/

– The Big Lie, Stone Choir (2023) – https://stone-choir.com/the-big-lie/

– The strange relationship of liberals to power: their psychology as the forever underdog, Neoliberal Feudalism (2023) – https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-strange-relationship-of-liberals

The post Myth of the 20th Century: Stone Choir – Christian Nationalism appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

When I (reluctantly) think of American feminists, I usually lump them into three groups/time periods for educational purposes:

• First stage feminists (women’s suffrage and abolition proponents)
• Second stage feminists (1920s flappers and their 1960s counterparts)
• Third stage feminists (our current 400lbs ambersexual lesbians with rainbow hair and, possibly, a stapled-on penis)

Of course, there were some old school feminists (maybe we’ll call them “proto-feminists”?) in the early days of the newly founded republic leading up to the Civil War, but they did not gain much of a stronghold until after the war.

The true “feminism” as we understand it really did not arrive until the Gilded Age, which of course followed the reconstruction of the South.

(There are many reasons for this time period. One of the biggest reasons being loss of unique regionalization around the United States and the Second Industrial Revolution. But that’s not the point of this article.)

Throughout the vast majority of the 19th century before first stage feminism, what was called the “women’s sphere” existed in the form of the private household. Men were expected to be out in the public sphere, while women controlled their own private sphere. The combination of the two created harmony in a marriage and society.

During this era, a “true man” was focused on providing and protecting, while a “true woman” focused on virtue, purity, and domesticity.

Contrary to popular belief, this setup was not forced by men. Most of the enforcers were themselves women, as exemplified by the biggest writers/cultural icons of the time such as Sarah Hale that wrote about proper women behavior, and books like Godey’s Lady’s Book, which discussed how to be a lady and was one of the top women’s books of the era.

Men did not need to enforce it. The women of the era did so themselves. There was no fabled patriarchy, but instead a matriarchy that enforced those expectations on other women.

The reality is that true womanhood was set by other quasi-Victorian women. This Americanized Victorian society had its flaws, but the relationship hierarchy was not one of them.

It was not until the Gilded Age that the first-stage feminists got the upper-hand. It was once this matriarchy weakened that everything capsized.

It’s been downhill since.

Once you realize this, you realize that feminism really didn’t amount to anything until their success with the 18th and 19th Amendments. Which is why I start with them as the true “first stage” feminists.

The majority of the first stagers were largely still of the Victorian mindset – religious, zealous, puritan… just completely bonkers on the gender hierarchy question. They lost sight of why God implemented those gender roles in the Bible, and the great experimentation of feminism soon followed.

For instance, first stage feminists were against drinking and moral vices, which is ironic considering their own children went the complete opposite direction. They gave birth to and raised the second stage feminists, who were major drinkers, smokers, and whores. Which the American Victorian women never expected would occur with their children’s newfound freedom.

But it happened.

We usually call them the flappers:

Flappers were a subculture of young Western women in the 1920s who wore short skirts (knee height was considered short during that period), bobbed their hair, listened to jazz, and flaunted their disdain for what was then considered acceptable behavior. Flappers were seen as brash for wearing excessive makeup, drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes in public, driving automobiles, treating sex in a casual manner, and otherwise flouting social and sexual norms. As automobiles became more available, flappers gained freedom of movement and privacy.

Flappers are icons of the Roaring Twenties, the social, political turbulence, and increased transatlantic cultural exchange that followed the end of World War I, as well as the export of American jazz culture to Europe. There was a reaction to this counterculture from more conservative people, who belonged mostly to older generations. They claimed that the flappers’ dresses were “near nakedness”, and that flappers were “flippant”, “reckless”, and unintelligent.

Hilariously, more young women consumed alcohol in the decade it was illegal than ever before. Even though the older women were the major pushes for prohibition, the younger women went the complete opposite direction.

Ironically, the first stage feminist’s biggest opponents were none other than second stage feminists.

First stage feminists birthed a generation that did not care at all about their parent’s feminism or moral masquerading for female empowerment. They cared only about pleasing themselves, escaping responsibility, and being free to do whatever they wanted. Which is a natural response to first stage feminism.

If a nation is infected with the first stage, and it is not cured, it naturally progresses to this second stage. Similar to any other form of disease progression in a human.

A single female generation completely turned the tables on what feminism was, turning it from a “woman deserves the right to vote and men shouldn’t be drunkards,” to the sexual experimentation explosion of the Roaring Twenties, which directly lead to the degenerate Boomer subculture of the 1960s.

There was this interim period because of the Great Depression and Great War, obviously, but once those two were resolved, the degeneracy picked right back up where it started in the 1920s. The feminists in the end of the 1920s rolled right into Boomertown in the 1960s. They skipped a beat, but came back with a degenerate, vitriol vengeance.

The first stage feminists realized the differences between men and women; they just wanted to be able to do more within the public sphere (although, without accepting similar responsibility). The second stage feminists said that they could do everything a man could do: drink, smoke, work, and screw. Is it any surprise that the third stage feminists believe that women can now be men by simple personal declaration? The pathway was always there intuitively:

• Stage 1. Women should be able to do everything a man does in the public sphere.
• Stage 2. Women can do everything a man does, period.
• Stage 3. Women can be a man.

This end result was, and always is, the end conclusion of the feminist movement. It’s where it has to end, by its own logic. If reality truly has no gender roles and no gender hierarchy, then the feminists are not wrong when they conclude that gender is a social construct. Under that perverted and wrong logic, it is.

But the true reality is that men and women have different roles which are best suited for them, and they do have a God-given hierarchy which they are ordered to follow. This throws the very first bullet point into the trash, and each subsequent one fails alongside it.

As soon as a person removes gender roles, and puts in the lie that a woman should be able to do everything that a man does, the end result is societal destruction. Strong families cannot survive in such a climate, and a nation cannot survive without strong families.

Thus, while I gave a softer hand to the first stage feminists in this article, the first stage feminists were just as at fault as the second stage feminists. This is true even though the first stage feminists would be aghast at the third stage feminists and would have probably chosen to burn them at the stake.

All three stages utilize this principle to varying degrees.It is helpful for us to know the origins of where our current cultural degeneration comes from, so that we may better protect against it in the future. The first stage feminists, while likely well-intentioned, completely and utterly destroyed our American families. They failed because they loved the lie over the truth.

The roots of the American feminist plague lie with the women’s suffrage and abolition movement, but the worst aspects of feminism lie with the flappers and the “new feminism” of the 1920s. The seeds were planted in that decade to later be wickedly harvested in the 1960s, which lead to where we are now.

The only way to truly permanently correct this problem is to hold to the truth of gender roles and gender hierarchy. In doing so, the lies can gain no traction. It is only when tolerance for lies creeps in that the downhill-snowball effect begins.

Only through this can we ensure the ride down the slippery slope to the hamplanet, crossdresser society we currently inhabit is never taken again.

The post The First American Feminists appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

You, the currently alive reproduction-capable human being, are the problem to be solved. So, when our long deceased forebearers are

The post Why Can’t I Have This? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Modernity's godless ChatGPT.

The post Texting with Jesus appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Did you watch the GOP debate? It was painful. We were treated to old timers with zero chance of winning

The post The GOP Wants 2014 appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

If blacks gripe about being slaves, well they can do that because they were actually brought here as slaves. What

The post Credible Complaints appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

This past week, I watched the Republican debates on both Wednesday, August 23rd (when they were held) and revisited the

The post Grading the First Republican Debates appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Power abhors a vacuum, water fills every empty space it can get to, and hungry people are not picky. These

The post Into the Void, Oliver Anthony appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

[The inspiration for the lengthy article which follows comes from a short conversation I recently had with one of my

The post The Importance of True Education to a Free and Independent Dixie appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Prior to Trump’s 2016 campaign, I had little to no interest in politics from a conventional red vs blue voting

The post Prices Will be Paid appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Realists are helpful folks, helping us to avoid disastrous courses as it regards war in the Ukraine, responses to crime,

The post Europe, Africa, and Christianity appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Many people are hesitant to support a centralized ruler. This is especially the case in the modern day. Perhaps this

The post The Isolated Class: An Emperor by Other Means appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

As I write this, Alternative für Deutschland or “Alternative for Germany” (AfD), an authentically rightwing, nationalist, and populist party, is

The post Learning from Experience appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Hope is best left abandoned. If the vaccine saga taught me anything, it was that a grim sense of resolve

The post Republicans Defending Our Democracy appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

It is not a surprise that Trump is winning in the primaries. He is and always would be the “800lbs

The post Why DeSantis is Losing and Trump will Lose appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Got talking yesterday with someone who came to see us and the topic of the sour condition of the country

The post The Last Quasi-Honest Election appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Evil wants us at odds with one another, so we can’t be united against evil.

The post The Benevolent Empire: On Christian Infighting appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One of the foremost problems to confront as dissidents is that, as a collective, White people have a natural inclination

The post The Physics of Headspace appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Nations, like people, have a “pivotal event.” It’s the event after which everything changes and sets the tone for what

The post Potatoes and Opioids appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I think most of us that still have our brain intact (by avoiding the covid vax and the seed oils) would

The post The Humdrum Empire appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Former President Trump faces not one but two separate trials in federal court. The feds have a 99% success rate

The post The Indictment Op appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Let’s start with this: there will be no spontaneous uprising. It is a perpetuated myth coming from both sides. One

The post Our Own Dear Leader appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

If our dark times have obviated anything, it would be the absurd notion that democracy ensures the needs and will

The post Democracy and a Free Market appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

An excerpt from the book A Walk in the Park: My Charlottesville Story As the day drew closer, the event

The post My Recollections of Charlottesville appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

As the title infers, I watched the Unite the Right (UTR) Charlottesville events from the comfort of my home, not

The post Charlottesville: Observations from My Armchair appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

This is going to be one of those articles where I put forth a theory that I have not yet

The post Doubting The Counter-Narrative appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I once found myself at my local Walmart. It’s a grim spectacle even in broad daylight, which is the only

The post Stop Feedin’ Us! appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Note: This not to be an exhaustive exegesis on the subject of animal sacrifice, nor is it necessary to have

The post The Smell of Sacrifice  appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

“Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.”- Matthew 5:7 “For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and

The post Judgements appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Kaisar recently wrote a good article about the relevance of Julius Caesar, and we hope he will not mind us

The post The Good Shepherd Solution appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Make no mistake about it, Trump is going to prison. That is what the system wants. But it is not

The post The Ancient Christian Model of Resistance appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Just recently, a friend emailed me and commented that he’d like to see another movement promoting Southern heritage emerge. I

The post Will A Southern Heritage Movement Re-Emerge? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

If you’ve ever read anything else I’ve written, you might’ve developed the impression that I’m really optimistic about America. I

The post The Mascots appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I recently saw an impassioned video reacting to an older white man being shot in the back by a black

The post White Riot appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

It’s a long story, but I recently found myself dragged along to a Ukraine fundraiser. The food and drinks were

The post Fundraising Hell on Earth appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Most White people have a tough time putting themselves into the headspace of another racial group. To be fair, it’s

The post To Them, It’s All About Them appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Tired of being an employee and want to make more money? Start your own business! Advice like that spreads. Starting

The post Higher Rates, More Centralization appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Today, I thought it would be entertaining to poke holes in a common conservative/libertarian talking point: “government inefficiency.” I.e. The idea

The post The Lie of Government Inefficiency appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Generally, when a discussion of a Free and Independent Dixie emerges, there is an inevitable series of comments or questions

The post Fortress Dixie: The Foreign Policy of a Free South appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

America is in this sweet spot where we’ve become a 3rd World/1st World hybrid, an achievement unparalleled in human history.

The post A Beacon to the World appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

History is not static. It flows smoothly, as a river from one point to the next. Where we are today

The post The New Puritans appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One of my favorite poems, to which I’ve written about before, are the words penned by Rudyard Kipling in his

The post When the Rebels Began to Yell appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Intergenerational squabbling is highly counterproductive, so I’d like to begin with the disclaimer that this isn’t the point of my

The post Passed Over appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One particular aspect of Soviet society that is often overlooked is just how ideological it was, especially in its early

The post The Rise of American Lysenkoism appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

You are the average of the five people you spend the most time with. Author Unknown The principle contained in

The post White Racism is the Whole Entire Pizza appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One particular critique of the Dixian memorialization of the War Between the States and the Confederacy focuses on the tendency

The post Understanding the Reverence for the Confederacy appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The Roman Republic formed and thrived. Then it degenerated into the Roman oligarchy, as all republics do. There was an entrenched

The post The Julius Caesar Solution appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

This country has been demographically and culturally dumbed down past the point of no return. For example, when I was

The post Limited Potential appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Decades ago, I attended a youth event for my local stuffed suit Republican congressman. I asked him why we gave

The post Loyal, to Somebody appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I have two friends who are extraordinarily successful in the tech world. One is a high-end software engineer effectively retired

The post Checkmate appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Recently, I happened to run across a black lady whose first name was Kenyatta. When I asked her where she

The post What’s in a Name? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Another presidential election cycle is upon us, and already many within the Dissident Right as well as average conservatives are

The post The Mirage of a Republican President appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

It is becoming more and more apparent that the event that was once declared to be impossible by neoliberal ideologues

The post The Coming Sino-American War appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

There are few things more degrading and incomprehensible than the male cuckold. Personally, I can think of nothing more perplexing

The post Creating Cuckolds: An Epigenetic Theory on Failed Men appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I recently returned from a business trip to Taipei and thought I’d share some thoughts on the situation which is

The post Conflict Considerations appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

A common complaint on this side of the Internet is that our society is anti-male. Longhouse has entered the broader

The post Cycles in Masculinity appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Have you ever met someone that agrees with you on all, or at least most, of the issues and understands

The post Comfortable in Sodom appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

First of all, drugs aren’t a new thing at the White House. Willie Nelson smoked weed with Jimmy Carter’s son

The post Simple, Progressive Solutions appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Great Apostle Andrew,For the Savior’s GospelYou travelled many miles,Toiled many hours,Died a grievous death.Even after deathYou were not permitted rest,As

The post “Saint Andrew’s Burden” appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Alternative economists are right more often than mainstream economists. Alternative economists are less likely to be paid off by corporates/government than

The post Economic Conspiracy Theories appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Soon after the end of the Second World War, the United States and the Soviet Union emerged as ‘superpowers’, leaders

The post Myth of the 20th Century: Superpower Rivalry in the 21st Century appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I recently came across some furor over the Chinese FM’s comments about East Asian commonalities. He’s not wrong. You’d only

The post Ethnic Tensions appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Originally published June 22, 2023, at Dissident Mama. In this episode, my guest is Kevin DeAnna. Although that name may

The post Kevin DeAnna on the Dissident Mama Podcast appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

First of all, I’ve got nothing against old ladies. Some of them are really great people. In my own life,

The post “Riot” is the New Word for War appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Hypocrisy is obviously a real thing, but it helps to keep in mind that there’s a logic often driving it

The post People Who Are Problems appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

True revolution is hard to achieve. It takes discipline. It takes years of connectivity. It takes the development of skills,

The post On Revolutionary Thoughts & John Tyler appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

“…the standard of justice depends on the equality of power to compel and that in fact the strong do what

The post Military Recruitment and Secession: A Pathway to Victory appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

There was a lot involved in the hanging of Mary Surratt as one of the conspirators in the Lincoln assassination

The post What Did Mary Know and When Did She Know It? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

First, definitions. Implicit: 1. Implied rather than expressly stated: an implicit agreement; absolute: implicit trust; inherent Surrender: 1. To relinquish

The post Implicit Surrender: A Demoralization Psyop appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

“Why wouldn’t you vote. I’m not from this country—I came here from Newfoundland and lived in Ireland. Why wouldn’t you

The post “Why Don’t You Vote?” appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Have you ever been called a traitor, or had your ancestors called traitors? Have you flown your Confederate flag, and

The post A Traitor and His Flags appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Poetry

The post Faustus appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Trolling is a professional skill with different applications. In pro wrestling, it’s what the heel does to the crowd to

The post This is No Kid’s Game appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

There are many things wrong with America, obviously. One that’s not often discussed is that there are white men out

The post Cautionary Tales appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Hugh Judson Kilpatrick was the quintessential Yankee, a cavalry commander in the War of Northern Aggression, who reached the rank

The post “Kill–Cavalry” appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Some people struggle when trying to wrap their mind around why everything the rulers do is so obviously corrupt and

The post Why It Is So Obvious? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Her exclamation: You’re so deep! My reply: Well, thank you. My insights into character flaws come from reading Plutarch’s Lives.

The post You’ve Always Been Here appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One critique often directed at Southern Nationalists is regarding the South’s historical racial issues – specifically, how can Southern Nationalists

The post Race Concerns in a Free Dixie? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

There are various historical instances of a righteous man dispensing violence to someone who really had it coming. I wish

The post What Do You Want on Your Tombstone? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One aspect of Turkish Nationalism that has long intrigued me is its historical tendency to shy away from Ottoman nostalgia.

The post The New Ottomans appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One path to becoming a dissident is noticing that the front-facing political process offers little explanatory value for how decisions

The post “They” – A Lengthy Expository appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Love your neighbor as yourself. This is a command by God. A great, flawless command, as all of His commands

The post “Love Your Neighbor” appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

“Come on in and see what’s happening, pay the price, get a ticket to the show!” Styx Here we are,

The post Eight Years – “Welcome to the Grand Illusion!” appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Abolitionist/terrorist John Brown had, and probably still has, a reputation in Eastern Kansas as, if not a political messiah, at

The post John Brown – Abolitionist, Terrorist, Communist appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’m wondering what advice Americans are dispensing to Ukrainians. If I were one of these advisors, I guess it would

The post Crazed Ignorance appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

We see it everywhere in the memeplex. Cognitive dissonance occurs when individuals hold conflicting beliefs or ideas. In the context

The post AI & Open Borders appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The recent passing of Ted Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber, caused a great deal of reflection on my part.

The post Techno-Liberal Society and Its Discontents appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Juneteenth: the most ludicrous holiday of all time? Perhaps. I believe it should at least be in the nomination, if

The post Juneteenth appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The importance of Christian monasteries for the preservation of a nation’s identity is often overlooked these days in the West,

The post Monasteries Are Gardens and Guardians of Culture appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Recently, there have been two notable deaths among the hierarchy of my denomination, both prominent men and known by many

The post What’d You Say About My Momma? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

People in countries where they don’t have to deal with blacks often have a tough time appreciating just how much

The post They’ll Be Feeling Grateful Any Minute Now appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Understandably, this might be a provocative title and subject, and of course, there are many organizers within the broader Dissident

The post The Need for Better “Leaders” appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

We’ve reached a stage in America where anyone capable of performing critical thinking in any official capacity better keep his

The post A Faulty Analytical Framework appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

You may not like what I’m going to tell you. But as Napoleon is supposed to have said, “Truth alone

The post About Your New Neighbors appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In giving his overview of the general lifecycle of a nation/ethnos, Kaisar made the observation that:

In more ways than one, it would be best if a nation-state could remain within the Age of Conquests for as long as feasible. This is the best stage for sustainment, decent lives for the citizens, decent morality, with struggle (but of a nature that is not as difficult as the struggles of the founding or decadence), but no weakening of the men.

In other words, the Age of Conquests is where almost all dissidents would like to be. It is where a sustainable system needs to reside. We cannot remove the struggle aspect from life or we will enter the downward spiral to collapse. We must remain in the “hard times”, but in the best stage of the hard times. This does not mean we need to constantly be in military conflict, but we do need to constantly be in some form of a struggle for national betterment and dominance in some discipline, alongside a proper focus and culture. Only the Age of Conquests can give us that.

Recognizing how destructive unnecessary wars are for a people, how can Dixie or any other keep from falling into the decadence the comes with peace and affluence without warfare? The answer is found in the Christian Faith, in the asceticism to which the Church calls all of her children to keep vigilantly while living in the world, and particularly in monasticism, which is a heightened practice of Christian asceticism.

Prof. Georgios Mantzarides elaborates:

St [John] Chrysostom is particularly emphatic on this point: “You greatly delude yourself and err, if you think that one thing is demanded from the layman and another from the monk; since the difference between them is in that whether one is married or not, while in everything else they have the same responsibilities… Because all must rise to the same height; and what has turned the world upside down is that we think only the monk must live rigorously, while the rest are allowed to live a life of indolence” 7. Referring to the observance of particular commandments in the Gospels, he says: “Whoever is angry with his brother without cause, regardless of whether he is a layman or a monk, opposes God in the same way. And whoever looks at a woman lustfully, regardless of his status, commits the same sin”. In general, he observes that in giving His commandments Christ does not make distinction between people: “A man is not defined by whether he is a layman or a monk, but by the way he thinks” 8.

Christ’s commandments demand strictness of life that we often expect only from monks. The requirements of decent and sober behaviour, the condemnation of wealth and adoption of frugality 9, the avoidance of idle talk and the call to show selfless love are not given only for monks, but for all the faithful.

Therefore, the rejection of worldly thinking is the duty not only of monks, but of all Christians. The faithful must not have a worldly mind, but sojourn as strangers and travellers with their minds fixed on God. Their home is not on earth, but in the kingdom of heaven: “For here we have no lasting city, but we seek the city which is to come” 10. The Church can be seen as a community in exodus. The world is its temporary home but the Church is bound for the kingdom of God. Just as the Israelites, freed from bondage in Egypt, journeyed towards Jerusalem through many trials and tribulations, so Christians, freed from the bondage of sin, journey through many trials and tribulations towards the kingdom of heaven.

Despite the similarities between the married and the monastics, the monastic longs for something more – for the full enjoyment of the Kingdom of Heaven, the undistracted pursuit of Christ. Mother Ephrosynia of Lesna, France, provides this quotation to illustrate the depth of the monk’s or nun’s desire in her essay on monasticism:

Some people are very single-minded by nature. And there are ideas that permeate the lives of such people down to the very last detail. Everything is beautiful, joyous and of consolation, but this life is overshadowed for them by the memory of one thing, by a single thought: that of Christ Crucified. No matter how bright the sun might be, how beautiful nature, God’s creation is, how tempting far-away places might seem, they remember that Christ was crucified, and everything is dim in comparison. We might hear the most beautiful music, the most inspired speeches, but these souls hear one thing: Christ was crucified, and what can ever drown out the sound of the nails being hammered into His flesh? Describe to them the happiness of a family life, of a beloved husband or wife, of children, but Christ was crucified, and how can we not show the Lord that He isn’t alone, we haven’t deserted Him. There are those that are willing to forget everything in the world so as to stand by His Cross, suffer His suffering and wonder at His Sacrifice. For them the world is empty, and only Christ Crucified speaks to their hearts. And only they know what sweetness they taste still on this earth by sharing in the eternal mystery of the Cross, and only they hear what He says to them when they come to Him after a life full of incomprehensible hardships and inexplicable joy.

This longing gave rise to organized monasticism:

The monastic life, with its physical withdrawal from the world to the desert, began about the middle of the third century. This flight of Christians to the desert was partly caused by the harsh Roman persecutions of the time. The growth of monasticism, however, which began in the time of Constantine the Great, was largely due to the refusal of many Christians to adapt to the more worldly character of the now established Church, and their desire to lead a strictly Christian life. Thus monasticism developed simultaneously in various places in the southeast Mediterranean, Egypt, Palestine, Sinai, Syria and Cyprus, and soon after reached Asia Minor and finally Europe (Mantzarides).

And it is within the monastic way of life that the multitudes of the nations can experience the hardships necessary for a healthy society to exist without resorting to military warfare with other countries:

There are sighing and tears produced by the presence of sin, as well as the suffering to be free of the passions and regain a pure heart. These things demand ascetic struggles, and undoubtedly have a negative form, since they aim at humility. They are exhausting and painful, because they are concerned with states and habits that have become second nature. It is however precisely through this abasement, self purification, that man clears the way for God’s grace to appear and to act within his heart. God does not manifest Himself to an impure heart (Mantzarides).

. . . sooner or later “reality” strikes and you see that everything that’s been written about the hardships of monastic life is not just fancy words or symbolic phrases or allegory. It’s not the physical side that’s hard. With some effort and discipline anyone can learn to get up early and to stand through long church services, to make prostrations and to work, and work hard, at jobs that you don’t necessarily like. A lot of people in the world have a much more difficult life in that sense. It’s the encounter with yourself and who you really are and the struggle to change that, that is the slow but painful, day by day, minute by minute work of the monk. The work is done largely through our contacts and conflicts with other people. St. John of the Ladder is very blunt about this: “… Derided, mocked, jeered, you must accept the denial of your will. You must patiently endure opposition, suffer neglect without complaint, put up with violent arrogance. You must be ready for injustice, and not grieve when you are slandered; you must not be angered by contempt and you must show humility when you have been condemned.” For most of us the most difficult element in all this is giving up your own will. One of the most quoted monastic sayings, that of Abba Dorotheos—another great teacher of the monastic life—says: “I know of no fall that happens to a monk that does not come from trusting his own will and his own judgment… Do you know someone who has fallen? Be sure that he directed himself… Nothing is more grievous… nothing is more pernicious” (Mother Ephrosynia).

The monastery as a ‘boot camp’ for the Christian – with its unsparing breaking down and reformation of the whole person, body and soul – may be discerned in the foregoing passages. The martial nature of monasticism is further seen in the not uncommon act of soldiers becoming monks. St Guthlac, the scourge of demons who made the swamps of Crowland, England, the place of his monastic struggles, and St Pachomius of Egypt, the founder of cenobitic monasticism, are a couple of the more prominent ones.

Misunderstandings cause some folks to frown at monastic life, however. Common objections to it are that it is an attempt to earn salvation solely by one’s works and that it is a Gnostic sort of rejection of the physical world.

Prof. Mantzarides answers the first charge this way:

The Christian life does not depend only on human effort but primarily on God’s grace. Ascetic exercises in all their forms and degrees aim at nothing more than preparing man to harmonise his will with that of God and receive the grace of the Holy Spirit. This harmonisation attains its highest expression and perfection in prayer. “In true prayer we enter into and dwell in the Divine Being by the power of the Holy Spirit” 22. This leads man to his archetype and makes him a true person in the likeness of his Creator.

To the second charge he offers these passages:

Monks . . . choose to constrain their bodily needs in order to attain the spiritual freedom offered by Christ. They tie themselves down in death’s realm in order to experience more intensely the hope of the life to come. They reconcile themselves with space, where man is worn down and annihilated, feel it as their body, transform it into the Church and orientate it towards the kingdom of God.

The monk’s journey to perfection is gradual and is connected with successive renunciations, which can be summarised in three. The first renunciation involves completely abandoning the world. This is not limited to things, but includes people and parents. The second is renunciation of the individual will, and the third is freedom from pride, which is identified with liberation from the sway of the world 24.

These successive renunciations have a positive, not a negative meaning. They permit a man to fully open up and be perfected “in the image and likeness” of God. When man is freed from the world and from himself, he expands without limits. He becomes a true person, which “encloses” within himself the whole of humanity as Christ himself does. That is why, on the moral plane, the Christian is called upon to love all human beings, even his enemies. Then God Himself comes and dwells within him, and the man arrives to the fullness of his theanthropic being 25. Here we can see the greatness of the human person, and can understand the superhuman struggles needed for his perfection.

One could also answer the Gnostic charge by looking at an event from the life of one of Ireland’s great monastic saints, St Kevin of Glendalough (+618 A.D.). In his life, it is recounted that when he was living in a valley of the Wicklow Mountains, he had a specially tender encounter with a blackbird:

Once during Lent, Saint Kevin stood praying in his hut with his hand sticking out of the window. Just then a blackbird nested in his hand and laid an egg. So gentle and compassionate was the Saint that he remained in this position until the eggs hatched and the fledglings were able to fly away.

If monks and nuns had a hateful attitude toward the world, St Kevin would have thrust the blackbird away from him. But he did not, and there is furthermore an abundance of these kinds of interactions with creatures in the lives of other monastic saints like St Columba of Iona, St Seraphim of Sarov, et al. And this is besides their service to man, in offering him spiritual counsel, food and shelter for those in need, education, and so forth.

Kaisar and others are correct in seeing that some level of hardship and struggle is needed for maintaining a healthy society. The ascetic ethos of traditional Christianity, and especially of its monastic life, provides those beneficial trials. And the South, being inclined toward fighting as she is, would seem to be a place where it could readily flourish, just as it did with our forebears in England:

By presenting religious life primarily as a ceaseless struggle against the “Ancient Foe,” monastic spirituality awakened widespread reverberation within a warlike society whose secular ethic . . . favored related values (André Vauchez, quoted in Robert Boenig, ‘Introduction’, Anglo-Saxon Spirituality: Selected Writings, Boenig trans., Mahwah, Nj., Paulist Press, 2000, p. 42).

How long might a country last that lives in such a way? The 1,100-year life of Constantinople/New Rome suggests the lifespans that are possible. May the poetic words of a renowned monk of that great city and empire inspire many Dixians to consider embracing the life of Christian asceticism and monasticism:

Mortals, escape with me from a false world!
Christ calls. Away! Life be our voyage fair,
Safe riding o’er the surge of cares and lies!
One quest alone employs the lonely Monk,
How he may reach the Haven of true peace,
Where never comes the strain of breaking hearts.
O happy life, all music, free from sorrow!
Where is the prudent seeker of true gain
Will part with all the world and choose the Cross?
–St. Theodore the Studite (quoted by Mother Ephrosynia)

-By Walt Garlington

The post The Martial Spirit and Monasticism appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I suppose “doomsayer” might be something of a fair epithet for a writer such as myself. Although, in my defense I’d like to point out that my general prediction of calamity is well-founded in a variety of elements. Demographics is one of the big ones. I recently came across an article about how Japan now has the lowest birthrate it’s ever had since it began recording that data in 1899.

Japan's Birth Rate Plummets To Record Low For Seventh Straight Year https://t.co/xYkHyUfOBR

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) June 4, 2023

It raises a fair point about whether Japan can remain functional or not as the demographic implosion continues. There are a number of significant implications. It’s also a problem responsible leaders in other countries have been trying to solve unsuccessfully. This is why nobody but the U.S. is seeking military conflicts. The supposed China/Taiwan crisis came out of nowhere for both parties precisely when the string pullers realized they were losing in Ukraine.

For instance, Russian married couples who decide to reproduce are entitled to various subsidies and also the equivalent of tens of thousands of U.S. dollars in government loans which don’t need to be repaid if they do so in sufficient numbers. A big domestic theme of Putin is “find wife, have babies.” These measures have surely helped bolster the birthrate, but not to replacement levels. Hungary has tried to do its best as well. This is a challenge of modernity stretching across race and culture nobody has been able to meet.

In Israel, the only tribe members reproducing themselves are the more extreme elements which is driving domestic strife as the “globohomo” ones realize these people will get the country destroyed after demographic reality gives them control of the political process. Meanwhile, they could enjoy their gay stuff within defined borders if this can be prevented so they can join the new Middle East order being set up by Russia and China.

Asia is a place I’ve done a lot of business. They’ve been grappling with this issue for quite some time. The days of China being the low-cost manufacturing hub are long gone. The birthrate crisis there is about as insane as Japan. The CCP hasn’t been able to do anything to solve it, and has greatly aggravated the situation by locking down the nation for years.

All the Americans I know who used to own factories in places like China and Taiwan are in Vietnam now. Across East Asia, low skill employment has been augmented by contract labor from Vietnam, the Philippines, and Indonesia. It’s been this way as far back as my first experiences there around 30 years ago. Eventually, it will probably hit Vietnam if the country keeps developing. I’m pretty sure the Philippines will remain the Mexico of Asia though. If you must go, stay the hell out of Manila.

Back on topic, these imported workers don’t bring families to be subsidized, but instead are rather tightly controlled (White, white-collar workers are treated great) in factory dormitories or in someone’s house as a care giver for an elderly family member. This is how a government that’s not trying to turn its population into a minority handles labor shortages. Employers must provide these workers with a flight home if their contracts aren’t renewed. East Asian countries don’t really have social welfare systems anyways. It’s a “he who does not work, neither shall he eat” sort of region.

In Taiwan, the government covers all fertility treatments for married couples and then pays a subsidy per child per month along with all sorts of other free stuff. Birthrate? A nightmare, but it hasn’t eaten its way to the high-tech manufacturing sector yet. Kids are essentially a crop, and the island was still producing a decent one into the late 90s and early 2000s. However, it’s going to hit soon. Their university system is already collapsing due to a lack of students. The government is in the process of shuttering half of it.

There’s a set of counterproductive dynamics going on over there, which I’ll run through before I get to our miasma. The first is that nobody earning an average income can afford a home, which is generally what couples acquire before doing the kid thing just like White Americans. Housing prices in China are absolutely nuts to the point an average office worker might not even have a chance.

In all of these countries, there’s cheap housing over most of the geography, but not in the major cities where all of the jobs are located. Also, foreign earnings are often repatriated into housing investments, so a lot of these units aren’t even occupied but this sends prices through the roof. Moreover, women there see marrying a guy without a college education as marrying down, even if he’s making far more money than her office job. This greatly exacerbates the situation. They make a much bigger deal about being college-educated than we do, where it’s essentially become a joke about how you’ll be stuck working at Starbucks.

East Asian men view their countries as experiencing a femininity crisis. In fact, a popular choice has become a mail-order bride from Vietnam where the women will still be a “trad wife” and work hard at wifely duties and the husband’s business, whereas most women in East Asia can’t even cook anymore. Moreover, Vietnamese aren’t considered totally alien from a racial standpoint like Filipinos and Indonesians. We lump them all into one category, but they certainly don’t look at things this way.

A Chinese man with a Vietnamese wife will still have kids who pretty much look like him. However, this often doesn’t work out well for the man, particularly in Korea. There’s also the issue of women devoting their fertile years to degrees and career and then struggling once they settle down approaching 40 along with men spending too much time on video games. They’re significantly worse than us in both categories.

Alright, so setting their problems aside, what does this demographic imbalance mean for us? Well, we’re totally fucked, that’s what it means. By the time an average American Boomer takes his dirt nap, he’ll have contributed (extortion, really) a substantial surplus to the national coffers in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. A Latino? Probably will have drained around twice that much. A black? They’re each an instrument of mass financial destruction.

Essentially, the productive contributors are contracting as the third worlders are being imported by the millions every year to a life of subsidies. We don’t need to spend lots of time crunching numbers to discern calamity. One of the pro-immigration arguments that piss me off the most is how they’re doing jobs Americans don’t want. Yeah sure, I don’t work on the line in a chicken processing plant, but the government isn’t paying multiples of my income to house and provide for my family either.

The other thing is that a huge percentage of the White kids today are all screwed up, not just culturally but in terms of their health. They’re being fed a steady diet of high fructose corn syrup and other nightmare foods and they’ve been injected with a substance that’s permanently changed their DNA and that of any offspring they might produce. How is this all going to play out? Not too well probably, but nobody has seen this before. Historically, I can’t really think of comparable scenarios that offer much predictive value.

Enjoy your day and don’t fret about the future! Trying thinking like a black guy for once.

The post Doom, by the Numbers appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Russell D. Moore, the former president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention and the current editor-in-chief of Christianity Today, recently wrote an article for that magazine entitled “Don’t Pretend the Ugandan Homosexuality Law Is Christian.” In the article, he condemns both the recently passed anti-sodomy law in Uganda and criticizes Christians in the West that support the measure. Moore, to his limited credit, does state several times throughout the article that he recognizes that sodomy is a sin. But his piece has several errors that must be addressed, which I will lay out here by focusing on three points in which I think Moore’s errors are particularly egregious.

The first issue with Moore’s article is that he is unwilling to be forthright in what the law actually does. Although he dislikes almost all it, his biggest complaint appears to be the use of the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality.” What is meant by “aggravated homosexuality” is never discussed by Moore, he refuses to define it, leading a naïve reader to think it’s simply a term for any homosexual activity. However, it is not. While homosexual activity of all stripes is made illegal under Uganda’s new law, not all homosexual activity is considered “aggravated homosexuality.” Rather, that phrase refers to the most depraved acts – rape, child molestation, and deliberately infecting someone with HIV, an act that is all but murder in a region struggling mightily with the AIDS epidemic. By refusing to define what is actually going on here, Moore is pulling the wool over the eyes of his audience, and he knows it. He understands that if he makes it look like the Ugandan government is going to start rounding up every last homosexual and kill them, he can gain a lot more sympathy. It also acts as cover for rapists, pederasts, and murderers. Uganda has criminalized sinful actions and assigned the death penalty to the most disgusting forms of those acts. It has not criminalized same sex attraction, but Moore ignores this distinction.

The second issue is that Moore does not address why Ugandans are particularly offended by sodomy. Yes, all Christians are required to do so, but there are reasons rooted in the early history of Christianity in Uganda as to why Ugandans are particularly aggrieved. During the late 1800s in the region now known as Uganda, there was a kabaka (king) of the Baganda people named Mwanga II. Something that must be understood is that to the Baganda people, the kabaka held absolute power over his subjects and could dispense death with no checks on his power. It also meant that no Bagandan in good will could refuse a demand of his kabaka, this included sexual favors. This is, of course, a gravely evil situation, one that was challenged by the incoming Christian missionaries who were teaching that God’s law was greater than the law of any man; thus, sinful requests by the kabaka must be refused. This would have been true of a heterosexual kabaka, but to make matters even worse, Mwanga II of Buganda was a pederast who would frequently abuse young boys. The chief of the royal pages, a man named Charles Lwanga, converted to Christianity and realized he could no longer participate in Mwanga’s sin, taking steps to hide young boys from this monster. Enraged, Mwanga ordered Lwanga, and the boys he was protecting, to be executed. These martyrs were burned alive, embracing their deaths because they knew that they would soon be in the loving embrace of Our Lord. This was part of a larger war that Mwanga waged on the Christians in his kingdom. Eventually, there would be 45 Christians murdered in total: 22 Catholics and 23 Anglicans. They are the Uganda Martyrs. Oddly enough, St. Charles Lwanga and his companions died in June – June 3rd, 1886, to be exact. The same month that has been turned into “Pride Month.”

Sodomy is particularly offensive to Ugandan Christians because they know what the earliest Christians in their country died fighting against. To allow sodomy, let alone promote it, is to betray their forefathers, but Moore will make no mention of this context. Moore, though nominally a Southerner, condemns the Confederate Battle Flag and has encouraged Southerners to talk to African-Americans about the flag. But when it comes to Ugandans and why they find sodomy so disgusting, Moore refuses to do that. Southerners fly the Confederate Battle Flag and the other flags of Dixie because it is a symbol of their people, no different than why an Irishman would fly the flag of Ireland, or a Russian would fly the flag of Russia. To be a particular ethnicity is no sin, while sodomy is a grave sin.

Finally, Moore apparently does not understand just how harmful sodomy actually is. Moore states that not ever sin needs to be a crime, and in the abstract I agree. It is, of course, a sin to lustfully look at a woman, but there is no rational or justifiable way to legislate against that behavior. We are talking about a passing glance or late-night thoughts. But some sins must be a crime, and sodomy is not like other sexual sins. There is a reason why Christian societies have dealt with sodomy more harshly than other sexual sins. At the heart of why sodomy is so particularly wicked is because it is a revolt against nature, and sins that conflict with nature are considered worse. If an unmarried man and woman have sex, this is a sin – it’s called fornication. And, it is a serious sin that should not be taken lightly. But it is also one well established within nature, it is natural that a man and a woman would want to have sex with each other; there is a reason why God instituted marriage for the regulation of this natural desire. However, sodomy is a sin that goes against nature. It sinks lower into sin. But Moore refuses to address this history and, as such, misleads his audience from recognizes the severity of sodomy.

It is one thing for the secular media to lie about the Uganda law. It is quite another for Russell Moore to play along in this game. If Moore does not think that homosexual activity should be a crime, then so be it. Nevertheless, he should be at least intellectually honest about it. Tell your audience who will actually be executed under this new law. Teach your audience about the Uganda Martyrs. More importantly, explain to your audience why Christian societies have historically punished sodomy more than “just another sin.”

The post Russell Moore vs The Uganda Martyrs appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Since most of my articles regarding the political cycle are long and involved (such as here and there), I thought it would be

The post The Stages of the Cycle of Collapse: Simplified appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Over my years of writing rightwing dissent, I’ve noticed there are certain immutable characteristics of my fellow travelers. One is that we’re not movable objects. For instance, not back then, not now, and not in the future is anyone going to convince any of us that turning a child into a tranny is acceptable.

This condition doesn’t apply to at least half of the population. Many White people can actually be conditioned to think that they arrived at erroneous conclusions cooked up by someone else for malicious purposes through their own mental and moral superiority. The scientific term is “shitlib.” Thus, by their very nature, they can never think the way we think or even understand where we’re coming from. It’s as if a large percentage of people are meant to be the flotsam of this world, which I don’t find encouraging.

Concordantly, because the truth will set one free, they’ll float in perpetual bondage. That doesn’t mean we don’t have an obligation to tell the truth, or you have to keep it inside you like a poison. Some of us feel that so strongly we’ve devoted enormous amounts of time and paid great personal prices for the privilege. What that means is that you’ll have to manage your expectations with most people and that’s going to have to scale up.

I struggle with this one in both a broad and personal sense but ranting for ID helps a bit. The first Trump campaign is when our sphere of content really kicked off. Everything was fun and games, which then devolved into a nightmare but we survived. It’s been non-stop insanity ever since and the ID contributors have been pumping out fresh content daily this entire time.

I’ve noticed collectively that the entire dissident sphere has been coming to grips with the logic of an escalatory insanity which now pervades every aspect of our civilization. Trump’s electoral victory was a pretty convincing demonstration that there were lots of like-minded people out there and by enough of them telling the truth, reforms could be accomplished. Since then, not so much. In fact, we’ve had a master class in how people you’re trying to help will throw you under the bus, congratulate themselves, and then get hit by the same bus.

Nothing is too crazy to rule out any more in terms of what the evil ghouls pulling the strings will attempt to inflict on us and what the average person will accept. One can infer they understand that most people are incredibly gullible, ignorant, complacent, and too scared to make a stand without realizing they don’t have much to lose in the big picture anyways.

This is our country, and you think it can’t collapse?Manipulatory actions are taken under this unfortunate premise, which time has forced me to accept as valid. For many dissidents, myself included, it took quite a while to come around to reality in this regard. If this wasn’t actually the case, things could never have gotten this far along, so I guess we didn’t want to admit to ourselves they’ll go much further along.

The COVID saga has fundamentally corrected my hopes about the sustainability of our civilization. I’m not saying you should be “black pilled” and devoid of hope. My point is that you’re going to need a well-founded spiritual conception for what transpires, because when factually confronted with its totality one will conclude we’re headed nowhere good at great haste.

This vague but alarming conclusion is logically inescapable. Hence, I hear everyone making it these days as the evidence piles up. There are a couple ways to cope with the emotional implications. One is to remind yourself as a Christian that in many ways, life is a moral proving ground and there are more powerful forces at work than just humanity.

No matter how severely they warp this world, this isn’t the long term, in which you’ll pass the time in a place much worse or better. That’s not to say you shouldn’t care about what happens around here, but to frame it emotionally in the proper context. Even if everything turns into a nightmarish miasma, your conduct remains extremely important.

The second is that you’ll just have to accept that things will inevitably culminate in crisis, but this will have to occur if we’re ever going to have an opportunity to establish a decent and sustainable life for new generations. Our financial, economic, and media apparatus is under total control, along with all the politicians and now the elections have been fortified with mail-in ballots. Telling the truth, reason, decency or even defending your life from a terrorist pointing a gun at you can get yourself fired from your job and much worse. They’re on a mission to get every single child and making progress on it every single day.

After dining with a teenage tranny, this doesn’t seem so rough.Domestically, there’s no peaceful or forceful mechanism for reform. If the system doesn’t implode from its own faults, then we’re totally screwed although that’s not going to be a fun process for anyone. It’s not about wishing for calamity, but simply acknowledging it’s in the cards as well as potential opportunities because we’re not going to get to the average person by telling him the truth. There’s ample evidence that this crisis already taking place in slow motion, and I come across it every single day.

For example, it would appear the era of the White military professional is coming to an end. Gen. Milley, who got to the top throwing his own under the bus, is being succeeded as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff by a rabid affirmative action hack who intends to limit the number of White male officers to their percentage of the civilian population.

As far as how that will help fighter jets stay aloft, who the hell knows? These things fly over my friend’s neighborhood. The best I’m really hoping for is that when they fall out of the sky, his house doesn’t get nailed dead on. However, an errant flight could remove some of the tranny flags and BLM signs that dot his neighborhood. That’s hope, you see?

Meanwhile, we’re heading into World War 3 with a senior officer corps that already seems to be devoid of anyone morally or intellectually capable of offering an honest appraisal of the situation. Imagine this guy talking the Biden Administration out of stumbling into a direct confrontation. You can observe dysfunctional dynamics at work anywhere you choose to look.

I’m not claiming to be a clairvoyant. What I’m saying is that I don’t see a single rational piece of evidence for the sustainability of our current situation right down to the DNA of the majority of the White population. It has been permanently altered by these injections. Likewise with the carbon, of which all life consists, that’s now being subjected to a bizarre eradication campaign.

When you see something infuriating and insane, at this point do you feel outrage or is it more like: “Of course!”? Considering all of this in its totality, I basically arrive at the same conclusion as Putin will now state openly, which is that this system we’re under is essentially Luciferian and operates above the official political structure of the West.

The usury element can be traced back from ancient Phoenicia, through Venice and Amsterdam to the City of London (separate from London, the king can’t even enter without permission) which is probably where the ultimate financial power resides, not Wall Street or the Federal Reserve which are much later arrivals on the scene and thus arranged at the behest of the original cartel.

This is a digression, but these connections can be observed all over the place. For instance, the great-grandfather of Bill Gates was the director of the Seattle branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Marc Randolph, the founder of Netflix, is the great-nephew of Edward Bernays, the propagandist instrumental in getting the U.S. public riled up for World War One to facilitate the creation of Israel. There’s an unending web of these connections, and that’s just the information available to the public. Gates doesn’t promote endless injections and Netflix doesn’t endlessly promote racial miscegenation (and Gates right before his push began) by coincidence.

The Great Reset – a blueprint for a better world after #COVID https://t.co/Tpr9OCgVFe @KGeorgieva @SharanBurrow #TheGreatReset @RobinPomeroyEd pic.twitter.com/8QpIbfrTNL

— World Economic Forum (@wef) November 17, 2020

Along with usury, the base of its power comes from exploitation, plunder, and most of all deceit. These evils are fundamentally opposed by Christianity. This power has clearly been moving Western Civilization towards a wholesale rejection of our faith, the core tenants of which make a society sustainable. It appears to be doing so in the misguided belief that humanity can be downsized and transformed into an obedient, malleable mass.

The problem anyone who bothers trying to figure everything out encounters, which is what tripped me up, is that all the contradictory goals and self-defeating initiatives provide the initial impression that there’s no system operating in secrecy, much less something pursuing an ultimate purpose. Replacing nuclear power plants with windmills, for example. It seems like abject stupidity right out in the open.

This misplaced suspicion lies in a lack of understanding about pure evil, which leads the entity possessed by it to the direct pursuit of nasty outcomes, such as plunging out of Heaven like a lightning bolt, and that it’s unable to foresee the inevitable results of misdeeds. In other words, without a moral compass, one can’t spot the consequences he’s heading towards. With the proper spiritual orientation, everything becomes simple to understand.

Thus, we can see how due to the evil nature of this system, it careens from one crisis to the next. Moreover, it needs to plunder at great scale to keep itself going, which Putin asserts won’t be done to Russia again this time around. China is also militant that there’s never going to be another lick at their ice cream cone.

As another digression, you might be interested to look up what happened to Russia under the Bolsheviks and the 1990s looting operation. Also, China during the Opium Wars and up to Mao’s takeover. Perhaps also the looting of India under the British East India Company (Rothschilds, City of London). This will put the plunder I’m referring to in perspective. Many such cases, but these are the biggest.

It’s not therefore unreasonable to suspect that we’ll be the target once again since the plan definitely isn’t working in terms of Russia and absolutely will not in terms of China. That leaves the familiar victims (us) besides the Europeans who are being de-industrialized to concentrate things in North America. Putin has warned that if success in war doesn’t open the opposing bloc to looting, they’ll use hostilities as an excuse for this type of thing.

We’ve already been plundered, but there’s still plenty left to squeeze. Pensions, various retirement vehicles, and also Social Security will probably be gone by the time Gen X attempts leaving the workforce. Old people would still receive money, but it wouldn’t buy anything like what they’ve earned by contributing for all these years.

In drawing whatever conclusions about the future one might, it’s critical to understand that in order to stave off implosion, this debt-based system requires perpetual expansion. However, we’re living on a finite planet with a shrinking productive population. Perhaps in some sci-fi scenario where the White population had a healthy growth rate and new resources in the solar system were developed, it could go on indefinitely. From this dynamic alone, we can see that crisis is baked into the cake.

Radical steps will have to be taken to wipe out the old system and impose a new one while increasing control because people are going to be absolutely dismayed at what’s being done to them. To put this another way, if it can’t expand, it must plunder instead. And, that’s going to really piss us off, so we need to be under a tight grip.

This is why the repression against White people who work for a living keeps getting dialed up while drug addicts plague the streets and a black crime wave washes over a nation with open borders. These aren’t a set of infuriating coincidences; this is about maneuvering us legally and mentally to where we can be kept under wraps when we get really upset. White people are capable of losing their shit, and that day is what they fear above all else.

NATO troops brawl with Serbs

Footage shows the moment violence broke out in the town of Zvecan

WATCH VIDEO: https://t.co/a2SZxA1UtF pic.twitter.com/ohaI5RD8dH

— RT (@RT_com) May 30, 2023

I wouldn’t be surprised if all government debt isn’t erased as these new CBDCs are introduced under the pretense of existential emergency. There could be multiple currencies. For example, those used for international transactions and separate domestic currencies for the peons. That which can’t continue won’t, the only real questions are when this profound shift is going to occur. War is always a good pretense. Massive NATO war games in Europe are kicking off, which always makes a nice excuse for prepping one. Things are getting hot in Serbia and the Ukrainians are claiming the Russians are about to blow up their own nuclear plant at Zaporizhzhia. It’s also roughly now or never for this Ukrainian counter offensive.

Russians are preparing massive provocation and imitation of the accident at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in the nearest hours.
They are planning to attack the territory of the ZNPP. After that, they will announce the leakage of the radioactive substances. pic.twitter.com/Vk6hRDD26v

— Defence intelligence of Ukraine (@DI_Ukraine) May 26, 2023

Right, just like they blew up their own POW camp and gas pipeline. So, maybe we get the war, or perhaps we get the climate emergency as an excuse to reset the system (really just another way to say screwing everyone over). My take is that the public finds fiery death and destruction much more compelling than being harangued about the polar ice caps. The lives of an aircraft carrier crew aren’t worth anything to the string pullers, but they actually are to Heritage America, thus providing a compelling event. Civil unrest stemming from the conflict is also a perfect excuse to implement all sorts of draconian measures.

They don’t care about the lives of Europeans affected by blowing up nuclear reactors, either. We’d be the primary targets of the war, not the Russians. It’s not as if they need to be defeated in whatever hostilities could occur. If the unstated primary motive for the war is actually domestic, it becomes clear why one could be undertaken without a hope of winning. To use an analogy, the most important thing this time around could be to keep riding the tiger rather than taking down big game.

The situation is already so kinetic it would actually be much easier to have a trigger incident than it would with China because the Taiwanese have no genuine enthusiasm for war. I must admit I hadn’t considered things from this angle until recently. All my previous articles came at it from the viewpoint that war would be crazy because the U.S. can’t win and lots of personnel would perish. That’s rather conventional thinking, which probably won’t put one in the head space of these ghouls. I could certainly be wrong, but I’m having a hard time making sense out of things in conventional terms.

So, those are a couple possibilities, but it could be some 9/11 event out of the blue. After the Twin Towers and now COVID, it’d be deeply irrational to think something is too evil or crazy to be done to us in order to justify doing even worse stuff to us. After all, the Japanese were baited into attacking Pearl Harbor and the Germans tried to take out newspaper ads warning civilians not to board the Lusitania.

The historical list goes on and on, so we can see that major undertakings don’t happen without some sort of dramatic event to corral public sentiment. If something happens, hopefully it’s a bump in the road to something better. I don’t really know, you just read a piece of informed speculation.

We mean it when we say that the United States is Bosnia and Herzegovina’s true friend and partner, and that we are here to stay.

Today’s B-1B bomber flyover is a demonstration of our enduring partnership with the Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina and our rock-solid… pic.twitter.com/iP7UqFT4NZ

— US Embassy Sarajevo (@USEmbassySJJ) May 30, 2023

Naked threat to repeat 1999.The post Paranoia: A Rambling but Cursory Expository appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Say thanks to the Industrial Revolution for the fact that you eat a credit card’s worth of plastic every week: Do you

The post The Industrial Revolution Diet: Unlimited Microplastics appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Before we start, I want to preface this article by stating that I know the premise is going to be controversial to some, if not many, due to the fact that it deviates from well-established reactionary dogma. So, buckle up and get ready, because this article might seem highly off putting to read.

For the past decade, one mantra I’m sure you have heard repeated is that the Right must abandon the cities and escape to the countryside. The cities are doomed, they say, any minute now the collapse is going to happen; get out of the cities! I used to agree with this position, too. However, that has changed, and I am going to explain why.

If you are a regular reader of Identity Dixie, you may have noticed that I haven’t been writing as much recently. This is because I’ve been extremely busy; additionally, I like to write about things that give me a creative spark. To that end, I’ve been doing a lot of studying about all manner of things, and one of those has been infrastructure. By default, when you learn about the complexities of infrastructure it naturally ties into things such as development, land use, city planning, etc. These topics then go down their own respective rabbit holes with more strings attached.

Needless to say, I’ve been reading (and watching) a lot of information about the nuanced details that have, up until this point, kept Western society functioning. Say what you will about the cities, or the countryside, but both are part of a mutual ecosystem. One cannot live without the other; thus, it is important to understand both. Having migrated from the countryside to a city, it has given me a lot of eye-opening experiences regarding civilizational planning.

Also, do not mistake what I am presenting as a plea to abandon any ideas you have about a rural retreat (or redoubt). All I seek to do is provide an additional perspective and information which you may not have previously considered.

As much as people fantasize about becoming a farmer, rancher, or homesteader, it is much easier said than done. For a significant portion of rural “dreamers,” their motivations for living the country life are tied to the idea of civilizational collapse and/or civil conflict (or something more fantastical like a zombie apocalypse). Needless to say, these types of people are not ready for rural life, generally speaking.

For all of human civilization, we have had cities. The reality is that we cannot live without them. God made it so, and we cannot live without shelter. If you stay outside too long in the cold and without appropriate clothing, you die of exposure. Period, end of story. Shelter is a must, and we build them in all forms and fashions. We then realized that it’s a little easier to maintain not only our shelter, but what’s inside or outside of it, when you aren’t the only person doing everything. In turn, tasks and chores were divided up between the family. Then, humanity realized our survival odds went up when the tribe paired up to make additional shelters in the same area. Now even more tasks could be accomplished, and suddenly you have the recipe for a settlement, then a village, perhaps a trading post, and eventually a city.

With all of this productivity, there will be excesses. So, what do you do with it? You craft new things, or you trade or sell it. Now, we are getting somewhere.

If cities were not important, wars would not be waged over them. People would not fight for them. History is littered with historic battles over cities, from Troy to Acre to Richmond to Königsberg.

Cities became not only a representation of civilization, or safe harbor from the wilderness, but centers of power fueled by the scale of economies and commerce. As such, they became natural seats of government and the processing of resources. It’s significantly more efficient to store and produce things in a centralized location. Cities are important to the function of civilization and cannot exist without the importation of resources from the countryside. At the same time, life would be much harder in the countryside without the goods or services a city provides.

Cities are built for two main reasons – location and economics. While they are not mutually exclusive, both are important. A city in a bad location will almost always fail.

What does a good location look like? Many American cities were explicitly placed because of this very reason. Generally, a good location provides access to navigable waterways, a supply of resources, manageable terrain, etc. This is why we have many large cities near major water systems, such as the Mississippi River or natural bays such as Tampa Bay or the Chesapeake Bay.

Economies are also important; many cities sprang up because companies took advantage of an area’s natural resources. Some exist to this day and are still very successful, while others became ghost towns. A city which sprang up because of a company is Alcoa, Tennessee, which is named after the very company which built one of the most productive steel mills in the South. The Rust Belt is also littered with such places, but due to offshoring policies, bad economies, or poor management, they are receding.

There are, of course, reasons that cities fail, such as crime (negative for commerce and the citizenry) or natural disasters. A prime example is Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans, with the failure of the levy system which flooded the city. Even to this day, there are large swaths of the city which have not fully recovered. There are other reasons as well, such as unfavorable city governments that produce even worse city policies.

A common fallacy people have is that if civilization collapses, cities will cease to exist or function, and this notion comes directly from Hollywood (a good example is The Walking Dead). Bear in mind that these are the same people who think that you, as an average person, can purchase a $50,000 Tesla when Uncle Sam bans all internal combustion engines. We have volumes of recorded history that detail cities do not disappear. When the Roman Empire fell, did the city of Rome evaporate? No, the area remains settled and was rebuilt and is currently the capital of Italy.

Cities are the cradle of civilizational power. To control a civilization, you must control the cities. If you cannot physically occupy them through conquest, you have to control them some other way (by hook or crook). Liberal elites want you, as a rightwinger, to abandon the cities, so you cede more power and control to them. They will then use the might of that city to literally enslave you.

A routine question regarding this issue is: how do we take back our cities? The answer is in the exact same way they were built – you start small. This is why political districts are a thing. Take over one and expand outward. This is exactly what the Left has done. And this is what we must do, if we are to take back the cities our ancestors built. Remember, this is your home, not theirs.

Places like Memphis and Baltimore were not always the crime ridden husks that they are now. At one point, they were shining jewels of the South – representing not only our civilization, but seats for our high culture.

Make no mistake, our enemies want us to abandon the cities, which is exactly why they do not stop people from leaving them. For every inch you cede, they will follow in your wake. Collectively, we cannot afford to discard any more of our ground. Part of “retaking everything” includes reclaiming our cities. Our cities are also our home, too. We cannot survive without them.

I hope in reading this I may have got you thinking a little differently about our Southern cities. Remember that they are ours, and we must retake them. I thank you for your readership.

God bless you and God bless Dixie.

The post Reclaiming Southern Cities appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

There’s been a lot of great alternative media coverage about the war in Ukraine. Since events drive traffic, I try to get an article out on the subject every week. This catastrophe feels like a denouement on a grand scale for a set of things that intersect with my past and current lives (I’m not referring to reincarnation) in both a personal and professional sense, so I do find it fascinating in a macabre sense of the word.

Plenty of great alternative coverage exists which I consume on a broad spectrum, in addition to the Chinese media and briefings from the Russian MOD. I use these variety of sources to draw conclusions and then provide my rightwing dissident take on the situation. I’ve noticed the thread that ties all of the alternative content producers together would be an intense frustration with, as the blacks say, “why you always lyin?”

One I check out regularly is Andrei Martyanov, whom I’ve been following since we were both republished regularly on a different site years ago. He’s a former Russian officer, so his take on the situation tends to be less than objective, which is understandable. Andrei offers one of the only honest English language assessments I’ve come across on Russian missile technology, of which he has first-hand experience. He recently critiqued an article from an Army captain in the Modern War Institute at West Point.

It’s a typically (for the U.S. military) insane review on the Kinzhal hypersonic missile and the May 16th incident where the Russians swarmed a Patriot battery at an airport in Kiev, with either cheap drones and decoy missiles or some sort of EW assault. In turn, it was quickly drained of its interceptors, thus forcing it to light itself up for a Kinzhal strike. Whatever tactic this was, it succeeded. The whole incident could’ve cost us upwards of 500 million dollars. A couple of the interceptors shot back down into Kiev. Quite embarrassing.

There are multiple points of verification for this happening, and a wealth of information from the U.S. military itself, derived from both testing and its combat track record that the Patriot system doesn’t work too well against incoming missiles. However, it has a decent track record of accidentally shooting down NATO aircraft. To be fair, the Russians are also damn good at doing this to themselves.

Notably, the Patriot has a piss poor track record (100%) of protecting Saudi oil facilities from Houthi drones which look cheaper than an undergraduate engineering project in Guatemala. The Russians have a variety of anti-aircraft systems acknowledged to perform better, with a solid track record in combat. For example, against a Tomahawk swarm in Syria and now against HIMARS and Storm Shadows in Ukraine. Foreign countries not totally under the American boot make their purchases accordingly, such as key NATO member Turkey (the coup against Erdogan failed), who bought the S-400 instead and told Uncle Sam to fuck off.

30 US Patriot PAC-3 MSE launch at a cost of $5 million per missile. That’s $150 million gone within 2 mins. At the end the Patriot launch platforms were destroyed by Russian missiles. Why would any military still want to buy Patriot after this failure? pic.twitter.com/JiNr06y0Rt

— Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) May 16, 2023

I read the author’s bio and it just triggers everything I know about my former comrades and why they interpret this conflict, which could escalate into World War 3 quite easily, in such an utterly ignorant and idiotic fashion. This expert instructor either lacks critical thinking skills or he knows that telling the truth would end his career and ostracize him from his friends and family, which I admit really sucks. Perhaps he’s trying to bolster his own emotional health. I’ll explain why, but first here’s the gist of his version of what happened:

The Kinzhal was shot down along with everything else sent to distract the battery [possibility nothing else was flying that night] just like the first one the Ukrainians claimed to have shot down on May 4th [The head of the Ukrainian air force actually denounced the first purported event as false]. A Kinzhal is junk compared to requested capabilities of the US army’s version which is currently being developed [so it doesn’t exist]. The “corrupt and inept” Russians have been proven a farce. Here’s a couple spinets that sum up why I find the potential for escalation so unnerving:

With this technical analysis in mind, it appears the Kinzhal is likely to join the Su-57, T-14 Armata, and BMPT Terminator in the dustbin of vaunted Russian weapons that have severely underperformed on the battlefield…

The ability of the Patriots donated by the United States and Germany to detect, track, and defeat this saturation attack coming from all different directions showcases the impressive advancements and upgrades that the venerable system has experienced since the Patriot was first updated for use against tactical ballistic and cruise missiles in the 1990s after its less-than-impressive showing against those threats during the Gulf War. Modern air defense systems have never faced a threat on the level of the current Russians air raids against Ukraine...

The Ukrainian success in utilizing Patriot systems to counter a saturation attack from modern weapons from a near-peer enemy demonstrates the remarkable evolution of defense technology and its ability to adapt to emerging challenges...

He’s typical of everyone I’ve heard from Gen. David Petraus on down about the superiority of America’s arsenal and how we’d swiftly mop the floor with the Russians if that’s what we decided needs to be done. Just like the rest of them, he offers zero real world scenarios where this has played out or plausible technical details, just a laughable misinterpretation of what’s actually happening.

The underlying premise he gets dead wrong is that the U.S. has a military designed to fight a war against a modern opponent with an MIC capable of sustaining combat for any extended period of time. Since Vietnam, it’s been an anti-poor people force, whereas Putin wields an implement designed specifically to confront NATO on the periphery of Russia in a massive conflict that could span years. Just because Russia can’t project power anywhere in the world to crush a poor country on behalf of Israel doesn’t make the bear a lame beast. Nobody I know with this dilettante’s background seems capable of fathoming the most basic principle of how the two opponents have prepared for a confrontation: only one side has genuinely bothered.

In fact, this means the bear can specialize in confronting the best systems Uncle Sam could deploy to defeat it. Uncle Sam doesn’t concern himself much with the bear’s capabilities, which is why a missile like the Tomahawk performs so poorly against Soviet-era Syrian AAs built to intercept it. This is the same reason the Serbs, despite the overwhelming odds against them, were able to use another such “obsolete” system to take down a vaunted stealth fighter in 1999 while only turning the radar on for less than 20 seconds. Russian missiles have long been designed to take out or fly past the Patriot system, which has been in service since the 1980s.

The battery hit in Kiev was the latest and greatest version. The fact that it was stationed there demonstrates that officials in the U.S. believe their own nonsense. If they were getting good information, they’d never have set themselves up for this humiliation.

What does this mean in terms of the author lying? Well, I don’t think that he’s lying if he’s interpreting the situation according to the point he’s trying to get across in his article, which everyone else tells me as well, that the Russian incompetents are fighting with junk. On the screens of those Patriot operators, it could’ve easily looked like they shot down one or multiple Kinzhals. Let me explain:

Kinzhals appear to be an air launched version of an Iskander-M. If one wanted to design a missile to take out American assets, he’d opt to outfit this thing with capabilities that would be a giant waste against the Taliban. It would need to fly faster than our interceptors, detect threats in real time, be equipped with the ability to take evasive maneuvers, and launch decoys to spoof our systems multiple times if a threat is detected on a long journey to the target through defended airspace.

Due to the anti-NATO mission of their military, the Russians have a vastly superior arsenal of various cruise missiles, along with vastly larger stockpiles and production capabilities. America’s military industrial complex is boutique by comparison. The Russians have been launching more cruise missiles in a few strikes than the total of Tomahawks fired since their inception. Cruise missiles are a colossal waste of money against Jihadists so one can make sense out of our MIC from that angle.

As it turns out, the Iskander-M (Mach 5 to 7 from a truck) can deploy 6 decoys from the rear of the missile. So, to the contractors operating the battery, it could look like they hit 6 Kinzhals if it also has this capability, which it does in all likelihood.

That’s what the Ukrainians claim happened. Their MOD tells crazy lies all the time and will even publish cut scenes from video games and claim it’s real footage, but perhaps these missile interceptions they’re always claiming were achieved look like real interceptions on a screen due to decoys. Apparently, some Kaliber variants can launch them as well.

This author’s bio shows that he’s got a good amount of international experience. However, dealing with one’s counterparts isn’t like dealing with foreign civilians or the other side’s military personnel. Most of humanity doesn’t like the U.S. military and considers it a force harnessed for malevolence. To the extent they do support it, that’s not because they approve of its overall global mission. For example, the Poles I know are cheering it on because they have a seething hatred for the Russians, but these same Poles will denounce everything else that it’s done since World War 2.

American military professionals are in a media and organizational environment where counterpoints don’t get raised, the group think is intense, and everybody making a career out of it congratulates themselves as the good guys and thanks each other for their service. I’m not trying to denigrate anyone’s combat heroism or military service in general, what I’m saying is that this is a huge problem as the boat sails towards the top of the waterfall which ain’t on Captain Crunch’s map.

I suspect part of this is the mentality of a man trying to make a career out of the modern U.S. military. Again, there’s also the consequences’ part he’d experience immediately for deviating from the narrative. However, I’m sure that on an emotional level, leadership has to double down on the moral righteousness of their cause and the superiority of their equipment and capabilities because reality is just too unpalatable to acknowledge, and the potentialities are downright unnerving.

That’s how you get the most absolutely stupid quote from the entire article: “the Kinzhal is more akin to a giant lawn dart loaded with explosives.” At the outset of the war, this thing punched through over 100 feet of rock into a bunker designed to withstand a nuclear attack and detonated the munitions stored inside. The blast shook buildings miles away. Russia is a gas station masquerading as a country, come the fuck on. Right, so a weapon with an established combat record is shit compared to ours, which we haven’t even mastered a prototype for yet. It’s so typical of everything I’m hearing, and it just makes me wish we could just get to the nuke part already because that would be the gentlest ending for all involved.

The Kinzhal isn’t the most advanced hypersonic in the Russian arsenal. That would be Avangard and the naval Zircon. These have yet to be seen in action, but if the conflict drags on it’s a good bet we’ll see them used both for the Russians to gain operational experience and demonstrate to the U.S. the recklessness of getting further involved, not that it would matter.

"The Russians are dying… it's the best money we've ever spent"

-Lindsey Graham, US senator#buitenhof pic.twitter.com/xOO1e9iyc9

— Richard (@ricwe123) May 28, 2023

Moreover, and contrary to the “expert analysis” that the U.S. has nothing to fear in a modern war with Russia, consider this: the Kinzhal was designed as a carrier killer. Putin has political considerations in this war. His base is boomer Russians getting riled up watching television news talk shows. They’re pissed, they want blood, and there’s only so many drone attacks on Moscow or incursions into Belgorod he can ignore before he has to mollify them somehow.

A carrier sailing around in the Mediterranean or Persian Gulf (where it can’t hide) could become an attractive option. Will the American public really want war when it sees a carrier wrecked? I have no idea what goes on in Putin’s head but it’s troubling because these are logical retaliations and I’d guarantee he’s got advisors floating just these sorts of scenarios. At least 20,00 Russians have died in this war that we started on their doorstep. Killing 2,600 American sailors doesn’t sound like such a stretch in this context. Russian boomers get pumped up with this sort of stuff all the time on television.

The reality is that the Russians have possessed the ability to locate and take out a carrier with missiles since the 1970s (at least). It’s long had missiles, which are currently slamming to Ukraine, that are designed to get past a carrier’s defensive screen, shoot upwards, and come down vertically on it at hypersonic speeds thereby plunging through the ship to detonate the magazine. Maybe some would be intercepted, but they’d be launching more than “some.”

This is a factor any American officer seeking a career should know. It used to be common knowledge which is why American plans for World War 3 all had the carriers near Europe heading south of the GIUK Gap as fast as possible, and then into the open Atlantic where they’d be difficult to find, and their defensive screen would have lots of space to deal with incoming threats.

Test firing of a Zircon missile from the Russian frigate Admiral Gorshkov pic.twitter.com/Se9D1rYisu

— RT (@RT_com) May 29, 2022

From reading this article, it’s obvious that the featured analysis followed the Pentagon’s playbook in assessing what transpires in Ukraine: believe whatever they tell us. That’s hard to blame because this happens at the highest level, which is how you get Kirby doing press conferences asserting the Russians lost 100,000 men in Bakhmut. The Ukrainians say something ridiculous happened, then it’s taken in good faith no matter how implausible without apparently any independent attempt at verification. As a military, the Ukrainians have a track record of telling the most buck wild lies imaginable and somehow we keep believing them. It’s quite surreal.

The other thing to note is that the author of this work of sheer delusion is the kind of officer who’s been climbing the ranks to the point where he’s the one advising the politicians, academic psychopaths, and State Department people of our capabilities compared to the Russians. This is how the suits then come up with these idiotic plans under a totally faulty premise. Nobody would come up with a plan for something as horrifically stupid as what we’re watching right now if they simply had an honest appraisal of the situation.

To use an analogy, a thug may wish to do a robbery. So, that’s part of why the attempt gets made. Still, if someone informs him that his target is a large man with a gun, he’ll probably desist from his desire. However, if he’s misinformed that his target is a weakling who can’t shoot straight, well that’s the distance between his desire and his death.

Indeed, what we’re watching is the dirty work of office workers who believe the bullshit and make decisions accordingly. They don’t understand what’s going on with the military situation in any technical, tactical, or strategic sense. This country is so far gone there’s nobody in uniform ranked high enough to get into that conference room and tell them. Anything could happen because over a year of failure doesn’t seem to be cluing these ghoulish idiots into reality.

Putin has a multi-decade track record of making threats and then pulling the trigger on these threats when they fail to deter. Ukraine is his fourth significant military intervention. The previous three were successful because he assessed the situation and wagered correctly based on real facts. Our string-pullers have done the opposite during his entire tenure. Nobody of any importance on this side of the equation seems to notice a pattern. Honestly, I’m far more frustrated than alarmed. Like I said, the nuke thing doesn’t really bother me.

Don’t worry, he’s always bluffing and Russia probably can’t even build a working nuke. The post Diagnosing Delusion appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Today, there should be a sadness. A soberness should grip us, for today we mourn the passing of our Southern dead, and it need not matter if they wore the butternut and gray, the coat of our colonial fathers, or the uniform of the Empire that now holds our people captive – we must remember them all. For whenever they were called upon to unsheathe the sword, in their hearts they were fighting for our people. They are the bravest of the brave, and they live on within us, and they are made eternal still the more when we remember them on this hallowed day.

Father Abram Ryan was and always shall be the “Poet Laureate of the Confederacy,” and it is my honor to introduce those who may not be familiar with his poetry on this special day. It is my hope that you will reflect on our brother’s words on this occasion and remember the great sacrifice of our glorious cause.

“March of the Deathless Dead”Gather the sacred dust
Of the warriors tried and true,
Who bore the flag of our People’s trust
And fell in a cause, though lost, still just
And died for me and you.

Gather them one and all!
From the Private to the Chief,
Come they from hovel or princely hall,
They fell for us, and for them should fall
The tears of a Nation’s grief.

Gather the corpses strewn
O’er many a battle plain;
From many a grave that lies so lone,
Without a name and without a stone,
Gather the Southern slain.

We care not whence they came,
Dear in their lifeless clay!
Whether unknown, or known to fame,
Their cause and country still the same—
They died — and wore the Gray

Wherever the brave had died,
They should not rest apart;
Living, they struggled side by side,
Why should the hand of death divide
A single heart from heart?

Gather their scattered clay,
Wherever it may rest;
Just as they marched to the bloody fray,
Just as they fell on the battle day!
Bury then breast to breast.

The foeman need not dread
This gathering of the brave;
Without sword or flag, with the soundless tread,
We muster once more our deathless dead,
Out of each lovely grave.

The foeman need not frown,
They all are powerless now:
We gather them here and we lay them down,
And tears and prayers are the only crown
We bring to wreathe each brow.

And the dead thus meet the dead,
While the living o’er them weep:
And the men by Lee and Stonewall led,
And the hearts that once together bled,
Together still shall sleep.

by Father Abram Ryan

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post March of the Deathless Dead appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Father Dabney put his finger on the crucial issue for the South (and for any people): There must be religious unity for a people to survive and flourish. He writes:

In what I found to be a fluid disposition, Rebecca Dillingham makes the argument, and I would agree on principle, that the South has been crippled by our denominational diversity. Although I do not agree with her conclusion that Orthodoxy is the cure, myself being more in favor of a blend of Southern Presbyterian theology and Anglican liturgy (I attend such a church); I absolutely agree that stability in the churches of the South must be addressed.

In saying this, however, he also reveals one of the main reasons why there isn’t religious unity in Dixie, although we don’t think he meant to: Folks treating religion as a DIY project. That’s what his solution for the religion question for the South boils down to, a preference for a new combination of recent arrivals in Christian history – “a blend of Southern Presbyterian theology and Anglican liturgy.”

One may discern immediately that something is amiss with this formulation according to the principle of “lex orandi, lex credendi,” which translates roughly to “The law of worship is the law of belief” (see p. 19 of this essay). There is a contradiction in blending Presbyterian theology with Anglican worship forms, as theology and worship form an integrated whole. Presbyterian forms of worship and Presbyterian theology cannot be separated, cannot be spliced together with other Protestant, Catholic, etc., theologies and forms of worship. They are mutually exclusive of one another. Such experimental religious combinations will not fare any better than the genetic splicing together of different plant and animal species that scientists have been madly going about lately.

New-fangled denominational mishmashes will not be able to withstand the attacks of the enemy over the long haul. What is needed is to find the Church that Christ established (not the one that man concocted), the one He promised that the “gates of hell shall not prevail against” (St Matthew’s Gospel 16:18). A central question we may ask, therefore, is – which Church received its form of worship from God Himself, and still uses that same order of worship? This can only be said of the Divine Liturgy of the Orthodox Church. The priest Fr George Mastrantonis says concerning this:

The Divine Liturgy is considered the most significant ancient Christian service, not so much for its phrasing and words as for its meaning. In fact, the Divine Liturgy was in practice right after the descent of the Holy Spirit on the Disciples of Christ on the 50th day after His Resurrection, as the sacred writer of the Acts of the Apostles records (Acts 2:46 ff)… The Divine Liturgy as such was the center of the inspiration of the first Christians in their communion with God and with one another.

In upper rooms and catacombs the Apostles and later the Presbyters and Bishops of the primitive Christian Church offered the Divine Liturgy for its sacred Mysteries. It seems that relics and reminiscences of that time were preserved in the Divine Liturgies of the 2nd century and especially of the 4th century when the Liturgies took their final form. But whatever were the various forms of the Divine Liturgy of the primitive Church, as well as of the Church of the final formation of the Divine Liturgy, the meaning given to it by both the celebrants and the communicants was one and the same; that is, the belief of the awesome change of the sacred Species of the Bread and Wine into the precious Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, the Lord.

The three most well-known versions of the Orthodox Divine Liturgy, with their ancient, apostolic lineages, are listed and described by Fr George:

St. Basil’s Liturgy is attested to not only by the Penthecte Synod (692 A.D.) but also by his friend Gregory of Nazianzos, who in his Funeral Oration said that Basil wrote “provisions of prayers, decencies of the Altar;” also by Leontios the Byzantios who put the Prayer of Oblation of Basil together with that of the Apostles; thirdly by the letter of the Monks of Skythia to the African Bishops (520 A.D.) reporting that almost the entire East repeated the Liturgy of St. Basil. Those are a few documents, among many others, establishing St. Basil’s Liturgy as a genuine work. St. Basil’s Liturgy is celebrated about 10 times a year, including the Sundays of Lent.

The Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts is very ancient, “known to the Church before the initiators Basil and Chrysostom” as Patriarch Michael (12th century) infers. It is ascribed rather to Apostle James or Peter. The information that Pope Gregory, the Dialogos, wrote this Liturgy is untrue for many reasons, among them that he did not know the Greek language. As for the use of this Liturgy the 52nd canon of the 6th Ecumenical Synod refers to it, decreeing that “in all the fasting days of Lent, save Saturday, Sunday and the day of Annunciation, the sacred celebration of the Presanctified Gifts should take place.” This Liturgy is celebrated in connection with the vesper service during the evenings. It keeps its venerable character even now whein it is officiated during the mornings. It is called that of the Presanctified Gifts because the Sacred Gifts have been sanctified previously in the Liturgy of St. Basil or St. Chrysostom. This Liturgy is not officiated for the awesome change of the Gifts, but rather for the partaking of the Presanctified Gifts by the faithful Christians.

St. Chrysostom’s Liturgy is well known and very common in the Eastern Orthodox Church. It may be celebrated every day of the year except the ones of St. Basil and those of the Presanctified Gifts, and on Good Friday. It is shorter than that of St. Basil and much reduced compared to St. James’. St. Chrysostom’s Liturgy put an end to the free prayers and hymns in the officiation of the Holy Eucharist. This Liturgy placed a seal on the free forms of the re-enactment of the Mystic Supper of the Lord, depicting it in its finest form with a destiny of enduring far into the future. Despite the addition of hymns at later times, the St. Chrysostom Liturgy remains the same majestic religious masterpiece with grandeur and dramatic appeal matching the human expression and the divine act. St. Chrysostom (345-407A.D.) was an eloquent preacher, writer and one of the Fathers of the Orthodox Church, whose writings have been translated into many languages and have nourished the Christian Church throughout the centuries.

Fr George makes the unforced error of calling her the “Eastern Orthodox Church,” but this obscures the fact that the Orthodox Church is universal, for all peoples, and that she was in fact the original Church of the lands of the West. There is a wonderful hymn dedicated to all Orthodox saints of the West that illustrates this truth. Here is a part of it (Ikos 4):

With joy ye shed your blood for Christ, O venerable martyrs, and to Him ye offered yourselves as a well-received sacrifice. And the peoples of the West, seeing your unspeakable patience, understood that the God of Glory Himself dwelt within you, and marvelling at such a thing, with faith began singing to you thus:

Rejoice, Tatiana and Anastasia, together with Sophia and her three daughters!

Rejoice, Cecilia and Agnes, who showed yourselves women unequalled in courage!

Rejoice, Laurence, archdeacon, together with Sebastian, the glorious martyr of Christ!

Rejoice, good victors, for through your unspeakable passions ye hallowed pagan Rome!

Rejoice, all ye who filled all the lands of the West with your struggles!

Rejoice, Agatha and Lucy, praised martyrs, for in Italy ye fought the good fight!

Rejoice, Valentine and Januarius, enlightened bishops, for ye sealed your teaching with blood!

Rejoice, Cyprian, hierarch, together with Perpetua and Felicity and all those that laid down their lives for Christ in the African lands!

Rejoice, Maurice, wonderful martyr, for in the Swiss lands alongside thy soldiers thou didst fearlessly stand up in the face of death!

Rejoice, Vincent, deacon, for thou didst hallow Spain through thine unimaginable torments!

Rejoice, Alban, valiant warrior, for thou didst offer thyself as the first pure sacrifice of Britain to the true God!

Rejoice, Ursula, bride of Christ, who with thy blood washed the German lands!

Rejoice, all ye Saints, that in the lands of the West confessed the true faith!

Fr Andrew Phillips of England also has numerous writings relating to Orthodoxy in the West, and there is now the Ludwell Orthodox Fellowship for the specifically Southern expression of the Orthodox Faith.

Later additions to the Orthodox Church’s Divine Liturgy also have heavenly origins. For example:

During the reign of Emperor Theodsios II (402-450) the city of Constantinople was shaken by earthquakes for nearly four months. At that time several churches, houses, and the city’s stone walls collapsed and were destroyed. All the inhabitants of the city were terrified. Patriarch Proclus (November 20) organized a barefoot Cross Procession and solemnly prayed for God to protect them. While this was taking place, the tremors increased dramatically, and a young boy in the crowd was lifted up into Heaven by some invisible power, and the people, cried out, “Lord, have mercy.”

After returning to earth, the boy told the people that he had heard the Angels glorifying God by singing “Holy God, Holy Mighty, Holy Immortal, have mercy on us,” and that a voice had commanded him to tell Patriarch Proclus that henceforth the people should supplicate God in this way, without adding anything to it. The Patriarch instructed the people to sing this hymn, whereupon the ground stopped shaking and the child reposed.

From that time the hymn was inserted into the Divine Liturgy, just as it was sung by the people during the earthquake, and as it is still sung up to the present day.

But we do not want to belabor the reader. If he wishes to explore further on these points, we pray that the Lord Jesus Christ would guide him.

We also thank again Father Dabney for raising this most important of subjects. There never was a people who survived without being dedicated to a divine order of some sort – whether Jews, Christians, Muslims, Hindus, etc. Uniting the South in the Christian Faith is therefore the highest priority. May the All-Holy Trinity have mercy on us and help us to achieve this unity (Ephesians 4:1-6)!

-By Walt Garlington

The post Dixie’s Church appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

On Monday, May 22nd, South Carolina Junior Senator, Timothy Eugene “Tim” Scott, announced he is running for president in the 2024 Republican Primary. As usual, the Republican Party was elated. They finally got an elected black candidate. The lead up to Tim Scott’s announcement was littered with Republican candidates eager to prove they are not racist. The New York Post wrote that “Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA)… was “very excited” about a potential Scott run, while Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) said he would “advise him to go for it,” and Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) said it “Doesn’t get any better than Tim Scott.”” The overwhelming need by GOP political hacks to prove that Republicans are not racist is pathetic, laughable, and yet, predictable.

South Dakota, a state with zero similarities to the demographic profile of South Carolina, nearly tripped over Iowa in an effort to show it was the least racist of them all. Republican Senators Mike Rounds and John Thune have already endorsed Tim Scott. “I think he is the closest to Ronald Reagan that you’re going to see,” stated Senator Rounds. Ignoring the fact that Reagan was a charismatic and handsome actor who was a ladies’ man during his heyday, it is hard to see what Rounds sees. The black senator who was never married (and reportedly never had a girlfriend) initially ascended to the Russell Building at the Capitol by means of an appointment made by the other 2024 presidential candidate from South Carolina, Nikki Haley. By contrast, Reagan, the actor-turned-politician, spent eight years leading the most populous state in these United States before becoming a political activist for limited government. The Reagan comparisons are always tiresome, but this one was just pure cringe.

Never to be outdone for his love of black people, Donald Trump came out in support of the Scott candidacy. Quoting the former president who boasted the lowest black unemployment in post-13th Amendment history, Trump said on Truth Social, “Tim is a big step up from Ron DeSanctimonious, who is totally unelectable.” As for DeSantis, the Florida governor does not think much of Tim Scott, stating that there were only three choices in 2024, “[DeSantis], Trump, or Biden.” DeSantis is in the minority of Republicans who cannot kiss a black candidate’s buttocks fast enough. His comment led Louisiana Republican Senator Bill Cassidy to steal the language of the antifa, claiming that DeSantis “depeopled” Scott on CNN’s “State of the Union” television show and claimed this was DeSantis’ attempt to “dis” a candidate. This coincided with Cassidy alluding to DeSantis’ alleged anti-black racism (something with which the NAACP agrees).

As if the defense of the black presidential candidate were scripted from on-high, the other Senator Scott, the terrible former Florida governor, Rick Scott, distanced himself from DeSantis. While praising Tim Scott, Rick Scott – who ironically co-authored the “PROTECT Kids Act,” expressed his desire for Ron DeSantis to “sit down” with the LGBTQ and black communities to find ways he could work together with the Florida government and address “real concerns” for transgender and African-American children. Again, this appeared to be an attempt to elevate alleged bigotry as a concern upon the black Republican’s entry into the race. The play became obvious over the lead-up to the announcement by Tim Scott: elevate Scott, ignore Trump, target DeSantis. Consequently, Republican advisors in the mainstream media were quick to point out that Ron DeSantis put most of the Black Lives Matter leadership of Florida into prison before permanently stripping black congressional districts while dismissing Tim Scott.

The fawning love for South Carolina’s Tim Scott – as well as Candace “Dox Dissidents” Owens, Herschel “Punch Drunk” Walker, and Ben “stab them in the belt buckle” Carson – is a depraved sickness within the Republican Party. In almost every case of a black political actor, if that black person shows any bit of love toward the Republican Party, the GOP will ignore the actual political or philosophical positions of the black individual and declare their undying love for the black person. That holds true whether the subject is the virulent anti-Southern, anti-White Frederick Douglass, the communist-rapist Martin Luther King, Jr., or Tim Scott. So, what does the other unmarried senator from South Carolina believe?

If you follow his record, which has been decried as harshly conservative by the usual leftist voices, you find a mixed bag. Note, my definition of conservative – someone who seeks to conserve – and the Republican definition of conserve are not the same, but I digress. Looking at Tim Scott’s record, it is clear that he should be entirely unacceptable to any voter who believes “law and order” are priorities in a rapidly collapsing United States.

To begin, Tim Scott has voted with the majority of Republicans on most issues, especially as it pertains to executive appointments, such as cabinet officials and judicial nominees (both for and against). He is for a balanced-budget and opposes same-sex marriages. In this regard, he will be touted as a good, loyal conservative. Of course, the Republican Party is barely a conservative party and voting along largely meaningless lines (such as appointments while in the minority) simply serves to raise the profile of the member’s conservative voting record, the substance of which is often lost in the statistics. What is more troubling are Scott’s tribal inclinations. Despite being a Republican who serves a generally conservative state in the South, Tim Scott often thinks like many of his black counterparts in the Democratic Party: “black first.” Consider the following examples.

In 2018, Scott teamed with Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Kamala Harris (D-CA), to pass a federal hate crime bill that made lynching an automatic hate crime. Ignoring for a moment that hate crime legislation is by nature anti-conservative, the perpetual myth that lynching was an exclusively White-on-others (usually black) crime was validated by the black senator’s definition of lynching and his flawed historical assessment of the practice. The reality of lynching was that the act was reserved for the most heinous crimes against a local community and it was especially enacted by Whites upon Whites (such as an accusation of sexual deviancy). Black “victims” of lynchings were most often neither innocent nor victims. Proof of this assertion can be found in the equitable way in which a White mob in turn-of-the-19th/20th century Georgia bypassed a black janitor, Jim Conley, who was falsely accused of raping a White girl named Mary Phagan, and lynched White (albeit Jewish) Leo Frank for the rape he clearly committed (leading to the creation of the Anti-Defamation League as a means to ensure Jewish sexual criminals are never held accountable for their crimes in the future). But Tim Scott’s anti-White animus gets worse.

In 2020, Scott led the creation of the “Justice Act.” Scott’s reaction to criticism from the political Left was telling: “Not surprising the last 24 hours have seen a lot of ‘token’ ‘boy’ or ‘you’re being used’ in my mentions… Let me get this straight … you DON’T want the person who has faced racial profiling by police, been pulled over dozens of times, or been speaking out for YEARS drafting this?” In other words, Tim Scott saw himself as a fellow victim of White-on-black racism.

McConnell seemed to confirm this belief in White racism and Scott’s victim status when he stated in the same article, “None of us have had the experience of being an African American in this country and dealing with this discrimination. I think the best way for the Senate Republicans to go forward on this is to listen to one of our own, who’s had these experiences.” Whereas some of the bill was commendable (such as a reduction in “no-knock” warrants), it also did the following: (1) it levied penalties against the use of chokeholds (referencing black criminal Eric Garner’s death at the hands of the NYPD); (2) created a federal database to track allegations of racism by police officers when considering other departmental hiring or promotions; (3) provided for federal suspensions of grants to police departments that hired or kept police officers accused of racism; (4) strengthened the role of the Far Left Department of Justice in local police training and oversight over allegations of racism; and (5) strengthened the Department of Homeland Security’s role in tracking bigoted communication, especially as it pertained to the proliferation of memes and content among law enforcement. In other words, Tim Scott’s “Justice Act” was a litany of black grievances, often predicated on outlandish lies. Trump would go on to rhetorically support the bill.

Thankfully, due in large part to the Democrat’s desire to deny a Republican win for the black community, the bill was killed by the Nancy Pelosi Congress. According to them, it did not go far enough. In reality, an election year killed the bill that would have otherwise passed. In fact, many of the provisions have since passed by means of executive orders through the Biden Administration’s weaponization of law enforcement grants. Like the rest of his fellow black community members, Tim Scott is never going to be a conservative in the same sense as Whites – especially Southerners – define the term. I have written about this issue before at Identity Dixie. The historic definition of American conservatism is predicated on a limited but moral government, by which the states are the empowered institutions, not the federal government. That concept is not shared by blacks who view “states’ rights” as a euphemism for their suppression – whether the state right is slavery, Jim Crow segregation, or stand your ground. The most conservative blacks have seen the American experience as one in which it is “us against them,” even if they hold a marginal animus toward “them” (i.e., Whites). Based on Tim Scott’s approach toward federal law enforcement reform, it is clear he has an “us against them” mentality, too.

Regardless, the GOP is hot for Scott, because he’s black.

The post The GOP is Hot for Scott! appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

John Randolph of Roanoke (1773-1833) said that he had never seen, “A Yankee who knew anything about the classics.” Exaggerated or not, Northerners readily recognized that antebellum Southerners loved to display their knowledge of Greek and Latin and had more than passing familiarity with the untranslated classics.

From the beginning, the South felt a spiritual kinship with the Greco-Roman civilization and parallels with Sparta in particular because of the city-state’s all-encompassing martial spirit, commitment to duty, and rule by a small citizen class of aristocracy and landed gentry. There was also an unflinching acknowledgement that both required the helot/slave class to sustain their agrarian economies. The Southern interest in Sparta goes deeper, however.

Sparta’s 1,000-year history was deeply explored by the Southern aristocracy because it offered a tantalizing example that suggested a potential for enduring greatness that was achievable if the right lessons were learned from Sparta’s rise and fall. And one of the keys to Sparta’s success was that it represented the rarest of balances a long-lasting civilization could attain: a perpetual warrior ethos that intentionally nurtured a high culture that was to serve it.

Unlike Athenian high culture, Sparta’s architecture, art, music, and literature, was employed to preserve the military spirit that kept decadence at bay. Spartan art and music was paid for by the city-state itself and was mostly a celebration of Sparta. Public monuments glorified figures of the state in what today many would label as unbridled patriotism and state-sponsored propaganda. But the Spartans didn’t view it that way at all. They believed Sparta was great and what they’d built over centuries deserved to be celebrated, glorified, and worth giving one’s life for.

While antiquity significantly inspired the Anglo-Saxon Tidewater aristocracy and landed gentry, the military tradition of the Deep South and Appalachian populations didn’t look to Sparta. Upon arrival, they were already genetically fortified by their Scot-Irish and Welsh heritages and a predisposition for autonomy and a fierce willingness to fight for it.

Given this backdrop, it is no surprise that throughout the South, men of all classes regularly follow the family tradition of military duty. From the Tidewater to the backwaters, a complex mixture of intellectual, historical, mythical, heritage, and ancestry created a warrior ethos that had no equal in any other region in the United States.

An honest assessment of the South today, however, suggests that the warrior spirit is in grave danger.

The High Culture ParadoxA high culture can only emerge once significant free time is possible. By high culture, I mean something of especially good quality, enduring merit, and things that represent, in some sense, the very best and most meaningful things of the culture itself. High culture deeply explores aesthetics, beauty, abstractions, and philosophical things; in other words, the transcendent, what is good, true, and beautiful.

High culture requires the literal luxury of time that only success and comfort can provide. It then requires a commitment of those who can afford it, to cultivate those rare talents among the population who have the ability to create high cultured things – sophisticated music, stories, and art of all kinds.

The glories of an affluent civilization that can produce high culture however comes with the price tag of decadence. And decadence unchecked will inevitably devolve into an indulgent sensuousness that expresses itself in the arts and that will sap the vitality of the warrior ethos in a population.

Popular low culture ascends quickly. It appeals to base instincts and emotions and easily triumphs to leave the things that plumb the depths of the human experience and the soul’s journey abandoned and mocked.

The wise Spartans were well aware of the connection between the arts and the health of the martial spirit. More importantly, that even in peace, they knew that their warrior ethos was integral for their survival and must be protected.

Emulating the extreme low culture of the ghetto and the underclass is what terminal decadence looks like. A dead martial spirit is one that joins in the celebration of the damned in all its swishing pride.

A reborn South will necessarily be one that will also revive the controlled demeanor of the Spartan warrior. This will only be possible if it begins to think seriously about how it will tame the arts.

The post Art, Decadence, and the Warrior Spirit appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Humans aren’t all the same, which is reflected in their moral outlooks on society and their interpretation of various situations. That’s why we all belong in our own countries or godforsaken jungles. Unfortunately, the majority of our shithole’s white population has been brainwashed into thinking we’re all the same.

Black people don’t suffer from this problem. To them, everything is about them, the most highly-capable race. So, when they were utilized as farm equipment it was a punishment from God on His divine chosen, and when they’re utilized as instruments of chaos by its contemporary sowers this is because their cause is righteous.

This can lead to a couple reactions from different types of white people that really piss me off and I’m not referring to the antifa variety. One type of our own will implore these blacks to be reasonable by pointing out the vast statistical disparity in interracial violence and the objective merits of a particular situation, like how the black career criminal tried to take a police officer’s gun.

Another type will look at the destruction caused by the blacks over this incident, use empathy to analyze the situation, and conclude that they’d need to be badly-abused to behave this way so there must be some validity to the black fury.

I hate everyone in both categories.

The inability of blacks, even the high-functioning sliver, to perform morally-objective assessments or “do unto others” is often referred to as “tribal morality” or “retarded childish narcissism.” In their minds, nobody else has a right to defend themselves from blacks, hold them accountable for crimes, or even interfere with ongoing violations of the law. The truth is really that simple, and the problem is that the people I described above would call me a racist for pointing it out.

This is how we get angry statements from family members and community leaders in the following hypothetical scenarios, which you’ll notice we’ve seen many times in our current miasma:

“Ain’t nobody got the right to take my boi’s life, dey ain’t have ta kill him.” – Shot dead while conducting an armed home invasion.

“He said he wus hungry, why you ain’t offer him da shirt off yo’ back? Ain’t no good reason ta kill dis boi.” -Deranged drug addict who died of an overdose while being restrained by a good Samaritan from attacking a pregnant woman.

“We done told you, y’all need to stop killin’ us!” – Looter departing burning box store.

“Ain’t like he was gone’ live foreva.” – Angry mother at son’s sentencing for murdering an elderly white man during a carjacking.

As a collective, there’s no reasoning with blacks. It’s possible to use some combination of fear and proactive law enforcement to impose a semblance of stability in their communities and keep everyone else mostly safe. What’s not possible is to achieve these two outcomes by praising them, apologizing for not doing anything wrong, giving them free stuff, and awarding them a privileged status vis-à-vis the law.

Lil Wayne co-signs Trump's "platinum plan" for the black community: https://t.co/5KEHwUEB6X pic.twitter.com/VePDQgIqoc

— Complex Music (@ComplexMusic) October 29, 2020

This country is a joke.The people I described above are inclined to think all or some of this could work, which is how we get this nonsense about judging people by the content of their character and platinum plans to unleash the entrepreneurial potential of the black community. They can’t conceive that more nefarious actors are in the process of imposing a new order on us using disorder achieved through precisely what these misguided idiots think could mollify blacks and get them to behave.

It’s as obvious as it is evil and crazy. For one thing, the black conception of material wealth at the racial level is that everybody is “given stuff.” White people are given more stuff than black people, thus explaining the disparity between a suburb and a dilapidated war zone like Baltimore or Chicago. By giving more stuff, you’re just giving them that to which they’re entitled. The notion that whites can achieve black good behavior through gratitude is infuriating.

In the clip above, blacks express their outrage at the importation of Latinos and the provision of free shit. One refers to their community as “forgotten” and a belligerent behemoth bemoans their “lack of resources and support.” If I was there, I’d be like: “Yo bitch, look how fat you is. Dey ain’t forget yo EBT, skiddlee bebop do bop.” Honestly, it might be fun to be black at this late stage.

Blacks look at what white people have and conclude that it would be reasonable for them to have it as well, but actually much more due to the retarded childish narcissism. This is how we get a situation like the reparations committee out in San Francisco. Blacks have been a net drain on California since they arrived but, somehow, they’re owed millions and these payouts are feasible. The irony of people whom testing consistently shows can’t do basic math being responsible for the prosperity of a modern economy is completely lost on them. Don’t even bother pointing it out, that would make zero difference.

San Francisco's 'reparations committee' has proposed a $5 million payment and total debt forgiveness for longtime black residents. https://t.co/YRss0zxz8N

— NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) January 17, 2023

As far as praising them and claiming they can do no wrong, we’re literally a country where people think that a pregnant white nurse robbing black teenage boys of their bike is a plausible scenario. They’re well aware they can whip out a phone and ruin the life of any white person they choose at any moment. Getting angry and demanding they stop filming you is all it takes.

What all of these measures, ostensibly to help blacks, amount to is the removal of civilizational constraints on a demographic with no native suite of capabilities to establish a civilization themselves. The goal is to destroy what’s left of our civilization, so that its remaining inhabitants will be easier to control. Is this healthy, moral, sustainable, or a tactic that stands a reasonable chance of success?

No, of course not, but neither is the system of usury that enabled the hijacking of something that could’ve worked out really nice. In other words, the entire premise of control is fundamentally unsustainable just like the Bible states. They’re riding a tiger and taking desperate measures to stay mounted as a systemic crisis approaches. Healthy people with a sense of themselves and the notion they have rights living in coherent communities will be a big problem when that day comes.

The facilitation of a black attack on Heritage America has to be understood in the context of global war, carbon footprints, genetic injections, and turning kids into trannies. It’s just one element of a multi-pronged approach to keep us under control. Things are coming to a head for everyone involved and I really wish me, and all the other bad white people, had remote bunker complexes where we could laugh all this off.

When you get pissed off, try to remember that this is not going to last. This could go well or horrifically bad for you personally.

Have a wonderful day.

The post Dey Ain’t Have Ta Kill Dis Boi appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Recently, we attended an affluent white shitlib event and found ourselves seated at a table with a (underage) teenage tranny (demon) wearing a skirt and sporting a bare midriff with a top that was pretty revealing of decent-sized breasts. It got up to use the restroom, and this was our whispered dialogue:

Her: “She has an Adam’s apple, I think she’s actually a man.“

Me: “Yeah, no shit.”

Her: “But the boobs though, how does she have those boobs?“

Me: “You don’t wanna know.“

The other people at the table repeatedly screwed up the pronouns and found themselves apologizing several times. The tranny never skipped a beat. I might actually have gotten a laugh out of dining with a tranny like “Admiral of the Fleet” Rachel Levine but really nobody there was prepared to dine with such a scantily clad young tranny.

A notable feature of white shitlibs is that they’ll endorse whatever is fashionable such as not arresting miscreants, but that doesn’t mean they’re okay with getting their car stolen. I think it was the same thing with that evening. It’s all cool until you’re sitting right next to one and trying to eat. There was an open bar, so that’s how I made it through. Although I like to consider myself a tough guy, I must admit I probably couldn’t have kept munching if it was lunchtime on a Monday.

Anyways, the conversation turned to literature and the demon inquired as to what I was reading. I told it I was a big fan of The Exorcist series so I’d been brushing up on the subject. At this point, I felt a pair of feminine eyes beginning to burn the side of my face. If you’ve read a rant I wrote for ID, it was basically a G-Rated version filtered by our editor of what I’m saying to certain like-minded persons in my real life, so she saw exactly what I was setting up. Nobody else at the table seemed to detect the troll taking place, including the demon.

I guess that goes to show just how crazy you sound to a normal person when you start ranting about Satanism. That’s simply not the context in which they interpret all this outright Satanism inflicted on us and were proud to have themselves injected with his mark. I was really enjoying myself, so I started going on about the concept of Satanic inversion, the Witching Hour, and asked it if it had ever heard of this conspiracy theory wackjobs bring up about the Illuminati. They made a movie called Eyes Wide Shut on the topic.

I brought it up under the false premise that my interest in these matters was based on the film genre. I’m not saying you should lie, but if you’re going to troll someone hardcore, a sacrifice is required. Usually, that’s the truth.

The demon thought it was interesting and didn’t seem to recognize I was talking about it being a demon. I know what its father does, so I’m sure all of its life has been spent in a privileged, comfortable setting where it wouldn’t find itself confronted by blacks or rightwing nutjobs like myself. It has been warped into a child of the devil in an era when this makes it part of a celebrated class around people who’d never not hold the fashionable opinion. Therefore, it can’t comprehend that the crimethinkers are lurking out there in the ether.

I walked away from the table to have a cigarette. The demon followed me and asked for one. I replied politely that it wouldn’t be responsible of me to give a cigarette to a minor and I’d be pissed off if someone gave one to my kid. In reality, I was thinking that smoking was going to be the least of its problems and a panic had suddenly gripped me as a question popped into my head: What if giving a cigarette to a tranny is like inviting a vampire into your house?

The post A Brush with the Devil appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Every time a phrase gets repeated by officials in Washington and the media, even if you know nothing about the subject, this should be the first indication that it’s false. It’s an often-outright inversion of the truth but in the very least an outrageous canard. Seeing as the conflict in Ukraine is the most significant thing since World War 2, it serves as a macabre illustration of this principle.

“One man’s war of choice” / “Unprovoked invasion”The stated goal of long-term U.S. policy in publicly available official discourse is to break up the Russian Federation into controllable entities. Part of this strategy is bringing NATO up to Russia’s borders ahead of the Federation’s scheduled demolition. This is common knowledge, even to the average Russian television viewer, but not in the West, where everyone has been told the expansion is to stop the restoration of the Soviet Union.

Back in 2008, when William Burns (current CIA Director) was our ambassador, he was called into Foreign Minister Lavrov’s office, and asked if he understood the concept of “no” and informed that Ukraine was a red line over which action would be taken. His cable on the meeting was later published by Wikileaks. There’s a reason why Putin receives sky-high domestic approval on his handling of this threat and the broader respect of countries that constitute around 80% of the world’s population.

“Only made incremental gains”If gains are measured purely in kilometers, sure the Russians have only been incremental in their success against a series of massive fortifications and minefields that can’t be blitzkrieged like the U.S. appeared to do in Iraq. This isn’t World War 2. Post-war, the Soviets set up Ukraine so nobody could ever tear through it again on their way to Moscow like the Wehrmacht (if World War 3 broke out).

However, if the metrics are irreplaceable Ukrainian lives and equipment, then Russian gains can be assessed as absolutely catastrophic. The MOD tally as of May 21st: 428 airplanes, 234 helicopters, 4,245 UAVs, 424 AA systems, 9,251 tanks and armored fighting vehicles, 1,100 MRLS, 4,871 artillery pieces, 10,365 special military motor vehicles. Depending on the estimates, these figures might entail 300,000 to 500,000 casualties. It’s difficult to count dead bodies from explosions, and Ukraine refuses to give anything approximating an honest accounting of who’s been lost from their units.

The grim reality is that after Ukraine refused (probably wasn’t allowed) to reach terms at the outset of Phase One before the Russians invested too much to compromise, they adopted a grim strategy of eliminating every soldier Ukraine could muster and blowing up all of their equipment while allowing NATO to deplete its stockpiles. This keeps the suicide operation going until a solution can be imposed once the other two sides have nothing left to offer in terms of conventional combat.

NATO doesn’t have anything close to sufficient military industrial capacity to sustain this war effort, not even a fraction based on what could be produced per month versus what’s required. After these finite resources are exhausted, the situation will collapse and then the comprehensive territorial acquisitions to resolve Russian political and security objectives will happen along with other measures the Ukrainians won’t find agreeable.

The best place to conduct this slaughter is in Donbass, where Russia owns the skies and its troops can be easily rotated and supplied. It makes no sense to waste Russian soldiers by the tens of thousands (perhaps more) punching through a fun house to make direct contact further to the west with extended, vulnerable supply lines where they’d take even more losses. It’s much better to let the Ukrainians come east for suicide.

It’s been designated an SMO (Special Military Operation) for a reason. They’re trying to minimize the losses of Russian personnel, not sacrifice them in a pointless narrative war with the West, which would never admit the truth anyway. Regular Russian forces generally don’t even storm urban areas. That’s done by the PMCs, Chechen volunteers, and the militias.

"Putin also badly underestimated the Ukrainian military, [which] has been in the midst of a transformation into a modern Western army where daring and initiative count. Putin also badly underestimated the reaction of the West."https://t.co/kns3hX6gRW

— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) May 15, 2023

As it turns out, he did the ice-cold calculations before this ever started.“Counteroffensives” What you’ll never see on television is that these operations are deliberately allowed by the Russians as part of this strategy of eliminating the entire Ukrainian military and everything NATO can send. As stated above, it’s much easier and safer to do this in Donbass rather than trying to locate units scattered over the vast western expanses of Ukraine because the logistical network has been knocked out.

The winter strikes against the electrical grid that didn’t cripple it were meant to drain irreplaceable interceptor missiles, as two are fired per intercept attempt. It’s now obvious why much of the Ukrainian logistical network is still in place despite their ability to take it all down from the start: the Russians want Ukraine accumulating men and material for missile and drone strikes to the west, and also moved into the east to get blown up by airstrikes and artillery.

A lot of this stuff only becomes clear in hindsight to outside observers because the Russian General Staff would never be stupid enough to disclose its plans. Putin’s initial statement on the morning the tanks got rolling was that his objective was to “de-militarize” Ukraine, but what that meant wasn’t clear at the time. As it turns out, “de-militarize” is a very sanitary term for this process of wholesale, indirectly-facilitated destruction described above.

As forces are assembled ahead of the much-hyped third counteroffensive, the Russians have been striking these concentrations with massive missile and drone barrages. In other words, why blow up the trains before the other side can pack them full of men and material? They’re essential to moving large amounts of both for long distances. If this grim logic is applied, the paradoxes marketed as evidence of Russian failure starts making sense. They don’t want to paralyze the Ukrainian military for a guerrilla war, that would be counterproductive.

The Ukrainians have accumulated billions worth of NATO munitions and equipment in massive stockpiles to the far west ahead of this counteroffensive. A series of missile strikes have produced the largest explosions of the war. It’s clear Russia knew this all along and waited to let them get packed full, before blowing everything to hell. Some of these recent explosions register on the Richter Scale.

The idea that NATO could accumulate massive stockpiles in Ukraine while keeping them a secret from Russia is ludicrous. There were probably human eyes watching all these logistical operations up close. Likely, the strikes were launched when the Russians concluded everything had been accumulated to begin sending east to smaller depots for distribution in combat.

Probably depleted Uranium in this cloud. Britain sent those rounds to help the people of Ukraine. 100-foot-deep crater, much more efficient than blowing up a bunch of garages full of this stuff.“Russian Retreat”What happened in the past two counteroffensives is that the Russians ceded ground in order to avoid taking heavy casualties fighting in direct contact with the Ukrainians, whose lives were earmarked to be sacrificed for this purpose. The Ukrainians gained ground but at the expense of having their forces decimated as they advanced in great numbers into Russian artillery.

This is how one-sided slaughters take place, not by plucky Ukrainians mowing down Russian orcs. Publicly, the U.S. military believes otherwise and goes with whatever figures Ukraine fabricates out of thin air. That’s how you get American officials citing these demented numbers asserting that Russians are dying in droves despite have tremendous firepower advantages.

“Failed Siege of Kiev”This is probably the most pernicious piece of evidence I’ve seen cited for the past year, because it really helps sell the others. During Phase One, keeping Ukrainian units (greatly outnumbered what the Russians sent in) stuck was critical as the Russians stormed Mariupol and secured a land bridge between Crimea and the new republics.

The force parked outside Kiev put political pressure on the government, but it was there mainly to keep Kiev’s massive garrison in place. It never attempted to enter or invest Kiev. Storming a city of this size could involve millions of deaths and far more troops than Russia has committed to the entire SMO.

So many would be required that war would first need to be declared for a general mobilization. Something on this scale hasn’t even been attempted since World War 2. After Phase One wrapped up, the Russians dispersed. It was nothing more than a feint.

“Putin has already Lost”This is the triumphal centerpiece of an official narrative shift, with the caveats that since he’s already lost, he’ll have to cut a deal not to come any further in order to save his own skin by ending the conflict. The official discourse aims to declare victory despite not delivering the full Russian defeat everyone was first promised. This is done by asserting that since Donbass and Crimea were already in dispute before his unprovoked invasion, NATO’s efforts to preserve Ukrainian freedom have been a success.

As far as negotiations are concerned, the Russians have made it clear that NATO can’t be trusted to follow agreements, as it has repeatedly broken them with malicious intent. Their official position on Ukraine is that it’s merely a puppet of NATO, so they’re not going to negotiate with Zelensky, either. What might happen is that some sort of one-sided agreement is imposed on the Ukrainian government while NATO squawks and tries to adjust the narrative for a fourth time from the sidelines.

A Recap The first narrative was that Putin launched an unprovoked invasion using comically incompetent, cowardly forces equipped with junk who’d run out of munitions in literally a matter of days as the Ukrainians conducted a 10 to 1 turkey shoot. Following Ukrainian victory over all its territories, he’d be overthrown as Russia’s economy collapsed. We were told to expect all of this to unfold essentially overnight.

The second narrative basically just adjusted the first but admitted this would take longer while citing the successful defense of Kiev, two counteroffensives, and Russia’s incremental gains as proof Ukrainian victory would materialize while things dragged on for over a year.

The third narrative is now saying that Putin has officially lost and that an end will be negotiated after Ukraine’s incoming counteroffensive, but that victory for NATO won’t include Crimea and Donbass, which is fine because Ukraine didn’t begin fighting off this unprovoked invasion in possession of these territories anyways.

This is why the phrase “full-scale invasion” has been employed consistently by NATO from the start. What does this mean in objective terms? Nobody really knows, but what they’re trying to convey is that Russia has used up everything it could possibly throw into the fight. Meanwhile, it’s been fulfilling major weapons export contracts the whole time while quadrupling military production for 2023. That’s the simple formula for making inferences about these catchphrases, which are merely tools for selling even bigger lies.

Iran to receive 1st batch of Russian-made SU-35 jets next weekhttps://t.co/QGeDiM02BA

— Press TV (@PressTV) May 12, 2023

Accountability The fourth narrative is going to be a real yarn to spin. I think we can be confident that it will focus on the massive casualties we inflicted on the Russians and how we saved the rest of Europe because Russia has taken such losses it can never try this again. The rest of the next round of nonsense would have to respond to what Russia specifically does to wrap things up, so it’s hard to predict.

It does seem probable that some of the other canards will have worn themselves out. After all, nobody says we fought the terrorists over there, so we didn’t have to fight them over here anymore. That’s retarded and it couldn’t stand the test of time. That should also be the case with Russia running out of munitions and equipment.

What we can also safely infer is that in light of all the other lies Americans believed about misadventures that ended in disaster since the end of the Cold War, most will believe the official take on Ukraine as well. That’s the nature of these average people. Through some combination of ignorance, gullibility, and a desire to believe we’re the good guys, they’ll continue to be conned right up until the end.

In terms of domestic accountability for the evil parasites who caused this slaughter and their functionaries, like Gen. Petraeus or McFaul, I’m pretty sure they’ll never even be blamed for anything or punished until the hereafter. Nobody important is even going to come out and say that we shouldn’t have given this a try in the first place.

For years, NATO countries feared that the expansion of NATO to Ukraine would trigger Putin. But Putin invaded Ukraine anyway. So after the war is over, is there a reason to not invite Ukraine to join NATO? Your thoughts?

— Michael McFaul (@McFaul) May 14, 2023

This lying psycho will continue to go around making lots of money and respect as an expert. The post Narrative #4? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’ve never been a writer who attributes much causality in terms of specific problems to specific demographics. However, we’re living under a government and media apparatus which operates under a guiding philosophy that all problems, in the literal sense of this phrase, are directly attributable to a single demographic. The term for this principle, by which ultimate blame for any particular problem can be diagnosed as soon as it arises, is White Supremacy.

The premise is almost theological in its nature. White Supremacy is embodied by White people, whereas all ignorance, ill-sentiment, and poor outcomes are pervaded by their spiritual corruption. Initially, it can strike one as odd, but America is a nation where blame isn’t something that’s actually tangible.

A wave of cities have sued Kia and Hyundai, blaming the auto companies for the surge of joyriders stealing their cars and damaging property https://t.co/dZ9QFjInnh

— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) April 15, 2023

For instance, black hands touch real cars in Baltimore but it’s actually the minds of Korean engineers on a distant continent to blame. If you read enough from who was able to attribute blame for theft to Koreans, who designed the cars, rather than blacks who stole these cars, you’d find it still ultimately comes back to White Supremacy.

BREAKING: FDA updates blood donation policy to include gay, bisexual men https://t.co/uZbQ6rl3U9 pic.twitter.com/kxkCFU2Ob7

— The Hill (@thehill) May 11, 2023

Likewise, as death and illness proliferate from blood transfusions, we can be assured that White Supremacy is a public health crisis. This has already been declared in official proclamations by municipalities such as Chicago. Attributing diseases spread through unspeakable perversions to the spirit of our corruption works perfectly well under the premise it also propels bullets across the distance between a black gun and a black cranium. I’ve never laid eyes on its metaphysical specter, but I suspect it’s clad in black robes and carries a scythe.

It’s fair and reasonable to suspect that sooner or later, they’ll come up with a method for winning class-action judgments against Heritage America in general for specific categories of misbehavior (remember, they can’t be guilty of crimes anymore) done by black people that are making black communities unpleasant. That’s the legal logic at play these days, and these days are nothing if not escalatory.

Sure, it sounds downright unreasonable to a constitutional conservative living under a rock, but not really in the context of the people with white skin who contrived this lunacy. To them, reality is subjective, and the Earth is there for them to “heal” (don’t get me started on what that really means) utilizing everyone else (you and everybody you love), who happens to be lacking in souls and deserve nothing better than however they decide to utilize us. A core tenant of American causality is that it can never be attributed to them in terms of a problem.

So, when it comes to problems, these white-skinned people don’t exist unless someone else is making a problem for them. Remember, this is a subjective reality. Causing a problem for these people might entail another group of people trying to solve a problem for themselves, which these blameless people would also agree to be a problem for themselves if it was being done to them. It’s complicated to the average idiot, but no more than why White Supremacy gets a rap concert sprayed with lead by a black cretin who will upload videos to YouTube rapping about his proclivity for this behavior.

.@SecondGentleman met with Jewish White House staff in celebration of Jewish American Heritage Month.

Our Administration is proud to recognize the Jewish staffers who help carry our nation forward each day and are helping create a more inclusive tomorrow. pic.twitter.com/QxH0rIDC3e

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) May 16, 2023

I’ve only been to the White House for a photo at that fence around the back lawn to embarrass my significant other during the Trump Administration. They’d never let me in, and I don’t really know how many people work there, but this would seem to be a pretty good percentage I’d imagine. I also don’t see any of the cabinet secretaries or all these other plenipotentiaries coming back and forth for meetings. The lack of self-awareness strikes me as biblical, to be honest.

Soros often is held up by the far-right, using antisemitic tropes, as the source of the world’s problems. To see @ElonMusk, regardless of his intent, feed this segment — comparing him to a Jewish supervillain, claiming Soros “hates humanity" — is not just distressing, it's… pic.twitter.com/ECAuYahSga

— Jonathan Greenblatt (@JGreenblattADL) May 16, 2023

There’s no way to manage the insanity they’re putting us through. When things go wrong, the average idiot tends to direct his anger towards the ostensible nexus of power, which is why the most successful tactic for blameless people is to stay behind the scenes pulling strings, blackmailing, and bribing everyone. For instance, the average idiot thinks Woodrow Wilson defeated the baby-killing Kaiser and FDR thwarted Hitler and Hirohito’s plan to conquer the world, meanwhile he has no idea who Bernard Baruch was or why Nagasaki was chosen as a target for an atom bombing that never needed to happen.

When they go mask-off and roll up their sleeves to do the front-facing jobs themselves, that’s when things tend to go really wrong for them and eventually right for everybody else (while it lasts), not that they can appreciate the distinction. That’s what happened in Russia, where they basically were dealt with through an internal shift of power that kept the communism they had imposed on the previously hapless inhabitants. Likewise in Poland and Hungary and other cases, but I’m not writing a treatise on history. I’m just another disgruntled White man with a keyboard.

It’s rather weird because they seem to see the ongoing process that they initiated and keep driving along, and as it gets further along, they freak out with growing intensity thus speeding the process up. Meanwhile, they should slow down and chill out because the amount of shit the average idiot is willing to put up with can pile quite high before he grabs a pitchfork and lights a torch.

Honored to meet with U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland and Assistant Attorney General for @CivilRights @TheJusticeDept Kristen Clarke. I am grateful for their strong leadership and ongoing partnership in combating antisemitism. pic.twitter.com/5BiqysjEn3

— Ambassador Deborah Lipstadt (@StateSEAS) May 4, 2023

I wish we had an ambassador to represent us, must be nice. It’s like they’re deliberately putting their faces on everything that pisses people off, thus helping them to make dot connections that before strained the feeble minds of the peasantry. Then, they freak out and use the power, they claim that they don’t have, to persecute and punish people who bring up facts that amount to criticism of them because they’re evil and fundamentally at odds with the truth.

Some Americans genuinely wonder why these blameless people require a personal ambassador to travel the world to freak out about citizens of other countries who get mad at them while claiming that White people getting together to represent themselves in any way, except paying reparations or kissing the feet of BLM protesters, is a threat to everything America holds sacred.

On International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, Interphobia, and Transphobia we call for an end to harmful conversion therapy practices, including those that attempt to change a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or sex characteristics. #IDAHOBIT pic.twitter.com/DA5XRXvb2Y

— Secretary Antony Blinken (@SecBlinken) May 17, 2023

Everybody, everywhere hates this stuff so why not find another Condoleezza Rice to push it? When a family man defends his child from a lunatic outside an abortion clinic, so the Feds raid his home with a SWAT team, why use the face that looks like these other faces of people in charge of stuff that pisses people off? Why not hire a politician? They’ll do whatever is required, free of moral compunction. That’s what they’re here for on their journey to Hell.

When the flood gates are thrown open at the border and every invader gets a free phone, why use a guy who looks like Merrick Garland in some distinct facial features to tell the peasants there’s basically no problem at all but White Supremacy?

One explanation which could be plausible is that the politicians are experiencing severe difficulties going along with every single piece of insanity while making something that resembles a credible case to their constituents that they’re going to DC to represent their interests. I don’t know how I’d try to pull it off, but then again, I’m not a glad-handing scumbag who stuffs a suit. Maybe they don’t trust the politicians anymore to stay strictly on script, so they’ve taken it upon themselves to get the job done.

Despite claiming domestic terrorism is the #1 threat to the homeland, @SecMayorkas can’t name a single case that he referred from DHS to DOJ for white supremacy or domestic terrorism. pic.twitter.com/9ZtYp1A3eo

— Congressman Greg Steube (@RepGregSteube) April 28, 2022

I guess we should be grateful because it’s sort of positive development, but the issue is that they’ve created so many existential problems for us that it’s tough to savor most or all of the time. I think one lesson of our dark times is that “an anti-Semitic trope” is something that’s really happening, and “theories” aren’t matters of conjecture.

True democracy relies on a free and open press. It is a sign of weakness, not strength, when countries unjustly detain journalists solely for telling the truth. Evan Gershkovich, Austin Tice, and hundreds of other imprisoned journalists around the world: we stand with you. pic.twitter.com/ATQd9ee8sS

— Under Secretary Victoria Nuland (@UnderSecStateP) May 4, 2023

The hypocrisy on full display is just so, so staggering. The post Faces, A Case Study appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Those who have done their research on Abraham Lincoln and his socialist proclivities realize he has been embraced by socialists, communists, and other left-wing types. This is common knowledge among many people. What is not always common knowledge, though, is that Lincoln, with all his socialist connections, is somehow still an icon of the Right. That fact displays the large probability that those on the Right have been taught bad history and had their historical understanding tampered with, which weakens their position.

Lincoln’s love affair with the Left has been noted in an article on February 20th of this year on Jacobin, which noted that Abraham Lincoln is a hero of the Left. The article states: “From Karl Marx to Eugene Debs to 1930s American Communists, leftists have regarded Lincoln as a pro-labor hero who played a crucial role in vanquishing chattel slavery. We should celebrate him today as part of the great radical democratic tradition.” If what this writer says is true, then Lincoln would have loved China Joe Biden and what he is doing to the country now.

The writer does not claim Lincoln was a socialist, but nonetheless, he grasped the “general concept” of socialism: the primacy of labor over capital and of liberty over property. The article continued: “Proclaiming ‘Communism is 20th century Americanism’ leaders increasingly paired Lincoln with black abolitionists including Frederick Douglas, Harriet Tubman, and Sojurner Truth…” If only those people had been aware of Lincoln’s racist turn of mind, they might have taken a different tack. Their “hero” would probably have balked at being placed in the company of black abolitionists.

In actuality, Abraham Lincoln never freed a single slave. His “Emancipation Proclamation” only applied to slaves in the Confederate States and it left slaves in slave-states still in the Union in bondage. There were five slave-states in the Union, including West Virginia, that the proclamation did not apply to. The slaves in those states were technically not freed until the passage of the 13th Amendment, which came months after Lincoln departed this mortal coil. So, Lincoln was not really opposed to slavery – unless it was Confederate slavery. He was okay with Union slavery. All the hype about him being the “Great Emancipator” is something we could label as “specious humbug.”

Most on the Left, and many on the Right, don’t like to hear the truth about Lincoln. In an article on Abbeville Institute by Dr. Boyd Cathey, he observed: “Since then (1981) criticism of Lincoln is not acceptable, not tolerated by mainstream conservatives. Instead the conservative establishment now heralds such neo-Reconstructionist historians as Allen Guelzo or even Marxist Eric Foner (a favorite of Karl Rove). Any dissent from the virtual cannonization of Lincoln with contemporary American society comes from mostly Southern traditionalists and their allies…”

Dr. Cathey is right. When I wrote for the old National Educatornewspaper back in the 1980s and 1990s, I did a series of articles on Lincoln and his socialist connections. The people that complained the loudest were patriotic conservatives who were ticked off at my telling the truth about their patron political saint. They didn’t want to be exposed to the blemishes of their “conservative” hero! They refused to be confronted with the facts! Many staunch conservatives today still think today he actually freed the slaves!

In an article by Claude S. Fischer, it was noted that, “During just one term (plus 45 days) Lincoln managed to do the following, socialist-communist acts: taxed the wealth creators…exploded deficit spending…led a federal takeover of currency and banks…forced people to work for the federal government…indulged in government giveaways to special interests…expropriated private property for redistribution…”

Joe Biden would have loved him, except for his party label. But, you have to remember that in the mid-1800s the Republicans were socialists, and the Democrats were conservatives. Today, both parties are socialist–Council on Foreign Relations socialists!

-By Al Benson Jr.

The post Abraham Lincoln: Hero of the Left, and, Unfortunately, the Right appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Viewed as a microcosm of Manifest Destiny beyond the confines of the geographical limits of the continental United States, the annexation of the Hawaiian Islands by the US in the late 19th century marked the beginning of what we now consider the global American Empire. To the Hawaiian peoples, it was a clearly just as if not moreso a historic moment, albeit done for reasons of pragmatic acceptance of their minor power relationship in an ocean surrounded by much larger political and economic forces. The Hawaiian Islands, given their incredible strategic military location in the middle of the Pacific, would inevitably come under the sway of one of the surrounding powers. It was almost always less a question of if, but rather a question of when – and how.

— References —

– The Influence of Sea Power upon History, Mahan (1890)

– Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq, Kinzer (2006)

– Banana Imperialism – Central America and the Rise of the United Fruit Company, Myth of the 20th Century (2020) – https://myth20c.wordpress.com/2020/02/05/banana-imperialism-central-america-and-the-rise-of-the-united-fruit-company/

– Indigenous Continent: The Epic Contest for North America, Hämäläinen (2022)

The post Myth of the 20th Century: Pineapple Imperialism – a History of Hawaii appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Have you ever wondered why you are here, why you would be reading a blog dedicated to dissident thought? If I would guess, it’s likely the same reason the contributors write for this this blog, too. You have a restlessness in your soul, a need to see wrongs righted, an obligation to have the truth known, and you still have a sense of honor. Instead of just melding into the ethos of modernity, never questioning the status quo, something itches at you. And here you find solace, a place for your conscience to get a comforting scratch.

Recently, I was privileged to be invited to contribute to a project, one which turned out to be a fantastic book. Many of you have already bought and read The Honorable Cause: A Free South, and I’d personally like to thank you. I honestly thought the book would be a disjointed collection of essays and off focus, since the writers randomly picked the subjects for their essays. Basically, we all got to scratch our own itches, but the final product did much more. For myself, it scratched a lot of itches.

From start to finish, the book just flows. James Edwards‘ opening essay tugs at the heart of every true Southerner, with recollections and quotes that, honestly, had me misty eyed. Mrs. O’Hara had me remembering my grandmother’s and aunt’s kitchens, and longing for the smells and tastes from the recipes they were more than happy to pass down to the next generations. But just between us, none of the wonderful ladies in my family can capture the perfection of the biscuits those two matriarchs created. Harry Bluff, with the precision of an English barrister, laid plain our argument for a Free Dixie, and from our most perfect sources of truth. Neil Kumar, a young man whose career we should all follow going forward, picked up a stone and threw it at the glass fallacy that White Nationalists and Southern Nationalists view the world through the same window. My essay comes next, a pallet cleanser of mythical fiction, a break from the academic, allowing the reader to recline and take another sip of whiskey (or sweet tea) before being engrossed in the ideological and practical challenges to come.

Launching back into the red meat of the book, Jude Ruffin arrests our souls again, reminding the reader that true Dixie has always had a remnant, and though our foes have tried their damnedest, we are still here and still distinct. Dr. Hill, as he has done for decades, articulates the organic nature of our people, our natural fraternity and paternity, one not limited to mere ideology nor philosophy, but that which defines us down to our very genetic memories. Anne Wilson Smith invokes a remembrance of what “nation” means, and what we are as Southerners and that we shall always be such, even as this American Empire collapses. Mr. Dirtwater, in his own Tidewater aristocratic and genteel way, compels us into recollections of our better ancestors, that we are more than a McDonald’s Happy Meal, or a Netflix binge watch, for we are Southerners, and we must carry ourselves accordingly. Harmonica uses his unique style of exhaustive investigational research to expose the enemies of a Free South, and revealing the hidden jealousies of our inferiors, especially the antifa cretins. In what I found to be a fluid disposition, Rebecca Dillingham makes the argument, and I would agree on principle, that the South has been crippled by our denominational diversity. Although I do not agree with her conclusion that Orthodoxy is the cure, myself being more in favor of a blend of Southern Presbyterian theology and Anglican liturgy (I attend such a church); I absolutely agree that stability in the churches of the South must be addressed.

The last scratch to the constant itch that many reading Identity Dixie long for is in the last essay. Padraig Martin gives a vision for practical secession. As a movement, we must be big, yet small, anti-fragile with many organizations, all working toward a single goal. Having known him for years and discussed these ideas many times, I believe his conclusions are workable avenues to Southern freedom. Of course, for a more detailed account of these ideas, I would encourage everyone to buy, read, and then pass the book to others within your sphere.

My writing for ID has been defined by the editors as “evergreen,” and I would like to think that compliment defines my work as timeless. Below is an edited poem I wrote years ago, long before any of this started, but I believe it speaks to the subject of the article, the restlessness of our souls, and why we long, hope, and work for a better tomorrow for our people.

“The Restless Soul”An open door
to walk right through,
The swung-wide gate
you never knew.

Locked in caution,
to all you thought.
An untraceable pathway,
you never sought.

In blinding rain
are storm swept tears.
Where the here to now,
move timid fears.

The cautious ride,
would move the walk.
In shadow an image,
would blanket, stalk.

A peaceful way,
the straightest, for sure.
Yet, the turbulent road
feels the cure.

The restless soul
all would have tamed,
but that’s no path,
for history’s fame.

The post The Honorable Cause of Restless Souls appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Originally published May 6, 2023, at Dissident Mama.

T.L. Hulsey is a retired computer programmer living in Mexico. He is the author of about a dozen books on subjects including political science, biography, translation, drama, and fiction. Hulsey attended, for two years each, the Catholic institutions of the University of Dallas in Texas and Fordham University in New York, majoring in economics and philosophy; however, he holds no degree. He blogs occasionally at LewRockwell.com but more recently at the Abbeville Institute.

The self-taught scholar’s latest work, “The Constitution of Non-State Government: Field Guide to Texas Secession,” released in November 2022 by Shotwell Publishing, has received praise from scholars including Drs. David Gordon, Clyde Wilson, Donald Livingston, Walter Block, and David R. Upham. You can purchase the ebook at Shotwell, and the paperback through the Mises Institute Bookstore and Amazon.

Hulsey explains kleristocracy and sortive democracy, how subjective theory of value can be used in symbiotic governance, the folly of universal values like equality, Americans’ fetish for representation a

nd fairness, why Texas is the right place for a decentralist order to be established, practical answers to common complaints against non-state polities, and more. It’s a conversation that’s part philosophy and part history, but one that leads to Hulsey’s “field guide” of cogent ideas and practical actions, revealing just how a peaceful political and cultural solution between people with intractable differences can be attained.

Download this podcast, watch on Odysee or YouTube, and listen at Dissident Mama.

Some links relevant to our conversation:
• “Human Action” by Ludwig von Mises
• “Anatomy of the State” by Murray Rothbard
• “A Review of ‘The Constitution of Non-State Government: Field Guide to Texas Secession’ by T.L. Hulsey” by Perrin Lovett
• “We’re all secessionists now” and “Fake secession for thee; despotism for me” by yours truly.

The post T.L. Hulsey on the Dissident Mama Podcast appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

In my last article, I initiated a conversation on the hard choices that will have to be made to achieve a Christian nation. To most of you reading this article, the implementation of Christian-based laws, economic systems, and religious adherence incentives will seem draconian, even oppressive. However, your grandfathers would have known them to be normal, part of their everyday experiences.

As discussed, the United States is consumed with many public sins. These transgressions rip at the fabric of our society – dare I say, they poison the soul of what used to be a coherent country, and by the grace of God, outlawed at the time of my birth. Abortion, sodomy, public displays of transsexualism, the ability to access graphic pornography in any form, etc., were forbidden. Additionally, those participating in such vices would be jailed. There were Sabbath laws, or what we called in the South: “Blue Laws.” Under these laws, only the smallest number of businesses were to be opened on Sunday, and only for public necessity. Usually, they were confined to a few fillin’ stations, and a limited amount of restaurants for travelers. By statute, these Blue Laws allowed for both Christians and non-Christians to slow down from the fast-paced modern life.

Identity Dixie has been publishing articles, creating memes, and trolling our enemies with this simple propaganda statement since its inception: “Retake Everything!” I have to admit, it got me disowned by some very “nice” people, many of whom are only now recognizing the peril of real persecution the Church now faces, along with the devastation of our way of life. That is, unless we become Southern, Christian, and adamant for our children, our people, and Our Lord.

So, where are the best chances for this Reconquista to be accomplished, and which group of people, demographically, are capable of making the greatest advances, and the quickest? This is a major point of contention in the Evangelical world. Just ask Stephen Wolfe, author of The Case for Christian Nationalism, if quoting simple facts and dispassionately presenting statics won’t evoke an all-out firestorm of vitriol by many in our churches. He recently tweeted out the raw numbers of which groups of people stood for (or against) some of the issues we have discussed. By all measurable statistics, it is White Evangelicals that resist godless behavior in our society the most.

With that in mind, the South is the natural place to build Fortress Christendom, and well into the next millennium. The reason being: Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, and Oklahoma have populations of about 50% White Evangelicals, and the rest of the South reach numbers between 30-45%, save Louisiana and Florida, which are about 25%. Although, those states have large White Roman Catholic populations that would rise, if divinely motivated. These percentages were from 2019, and since then, places like Tennessee, Florida, and Texas have had an influx of large groups of Californian Evangelicals. No other states have concentrations of ready-made advocates for the kingdom of Christ.

So, it is the Southern churches where we make our stand. We will change the laws we live under to reflect, as best we can, the clearest teachings of the Gospel, not trying to remake ancient Israel, but forge a nation marching compassionately and justly heavenward. Among these goals, but not limited to, men will be free to choose whom they associate, all men will work to provide for their families, those that are poor will be given a leg up (not a hand out), banking laws will be changed to outlaw usury, we will have sound money and that money will be used for the betterment of our people, our borders will be secured and we will defend them vigorously, and, finally, we will seek a peaceful coexistence among all nations, especially those that extoll Christ as King!

It won’t be easy, because in our world nothing is taboo, everything goes, there are no limits to the evil for which men can and will do, and the wicked will defend their blasphemy to the bitter end. Now, the question Christian Nationalists must ask themselves is this: “Am I resolute enough to understand that what we are facing is an all-out struggle – it is social, religious, economic, mental, and physical. Am I committed to a Free Dixie and ultimate victory, or martyrdom?”

I think you will rise to the challenge.

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post A Christian Nation, Retake Everything! appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Most people probably don’t spend much time hung up on eschatological questions. However, if they haven’t already this would be a pretty appropriate juncture. Statistically, it would appear people are concerning themselves with them less than ever in American history and yet there’s also a great deal of pessimism pertaining to the question of whether or not our troubles are terminal.

It strikes me as a bizarre paradox, but then again I’m a “white supremacist, right wing conspiracy theorist, domestic extremist, Christian fundamentalist.” They’re the “normal” ones, whatever that means these days. Still, everybody likes movies, so I’d recommended they watch Hellraiser (I and II, the rest were awful). I thought both were great, but I’m also a connoisseur of 80s movies. There’s also a remake I haven’t bothered watching.

“Go to Hell” – Kirsty “We can’t, not alone” – CenobiteWhether they’re into this genre or not, the purpose of watching is to get them thinking. The premise is that there’s a group of demons who will take you to Hell for unbearable torture if you open this puzzle box to summon them. The demons themselves used to be humans who were warped by their traumatic experiences and now sport the evidence of their own torture. They can’t even remember back when they were healthy dwellers of the Earth.

The underlying theme is that evil doesn’t procreate, it merely warps what is good. Tolkien had a similar theme on the origins of the orcs in The Lord of the Rings. He was an academic expert on Christian theology and Norse culture. It’s long been known that this is the nature of evil and that these identities being marketed to us now as organic are essentially the products of torture.

“But this is what you wanted, what you wanted to see…. It wanted souls, and I brought you.”The plot was the product of the mind of a homosexual, Clive Barker. Here’s an interesting quote: “Being gay does provide an interesting tension,” Barker says. “Part of me wants to say that I am just a regular guy, but another part of me says that there is a gay sensibility. This isn’t just about acts performed in the bedroom – it alters your point of view, your aesthetic.”

If you’ve ever seen the movie American Psycho, it was also the product a homosexual. It’s based on a novel by Bret Easton Ellis, and it’ll probably be the most disturbing one you ever read. Although the protagonist is a heterosexual who despises a homosexual in his firm, the stuff in there is so extreme it could never be put it in a movie (even today).

A straight man couldn’t come up with a scene like this.Anyways, back to Hellraiser. I’d challenge anyone to screen the two films mentioned above and then claim that this is not exactly the premise of what they’re doing to the youth of this nation with the tranny stuff. I recently came across a story about how they’re trying to produce babies with trannies. It’s right out of a horror movie:

The Wellcome Trust, a private non-profit openly aligned with the Clinton Foundation and a regular participant in the Clinton Global Initiative, funded a study to determine if a donated cadaver uterus can be surgically transplanted into the body of a biological male.

Maybe you already heard of this, the study was published back in 2018. These people have cooked up a Hell-on-Earth scenario. As far as I know, the first person to openly attempt this was Magnus Hirschfeld who was himself a homosexual. Hitler took great issue with that and other aspects of his background, but what inspired action was the children-into-trannies thing. It’s outright evil.

This evil goes back thousands of years, to the point one can pretty reliably document that these creatures are harbingers of doom. That’s the next thing on the timeline for much of the population after they pop up. They’re fundamentally Satanic and one doesn’t need to read the Bible to figure that out. After one does, it’s going to be a very enlightening source of information on these matters. Right and wrong are crystal clear these days. I suppose that’s the bright side of things.

Should one survive, my suspicion is that “tumultuous” will be the adjective for what’s coming, while “we should’ve seen it coming” will be the apt phrase to describe our current miasma. Or, maybe I’ll end up retiring to a golf course after all. We can’t see the future, so have a wonderful day and enjoy a cold Bud Light.

Pretty dark, maybe don’t watch. The post Raising Hell Here on Earth appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The Decline of the West by Oswald Spengler is considered by many to be an excellent book. But I take it a step further—I consider it a necessity for any true dissident.

It was one of the first that truly showed the spiritual decay of physical systems (civilization). And because of that, it is required reading in my opinion.

I have been skimming parts of it lately, and came upon an interesting quote that really points to rationalism issue I have been hammering on about recently:

• Be Cautious In Using Rationalism To Predict The Economy
• Materialism Is Not Enough
• Why The Right Keeps Losing: Secular Materialism
• Glorification Of Spiritual Ignorance

Here is the relevant quote:

“The philosophy of this book I owe to the philosophy of Goethe, which is practically unknown today, and also (but in a far less degree) to that of Nietzsche.

[…]

His place vis-a-vis Kant is the same as that of Plato—who similarly eludes the would-be systematizer—vis a vis Artistotle. Plato and Goethe stand for the philosophy of Becoming, Aristotle and Kant the philosophy of Being. Here we have intuition opposed to analysis.

[…]

Goethe: “The God-head is effective in the living and not in the dead, in the becoming and the changing, not in the become and set-fast; and therefore, similarly, the reason is concerned only to strive towards the divine through the becoming and the living, and the understanding only to make use of the become and the set-fast.”

If you have not yet studied the “being” versus “becoming” philosophical question, now is the time. Give it a search and do a quick review.

There are two specific terms Oswald Spengler uses: “Civilization” and “Culture”. These two words mean peculiar things to Oswald that differ from our modern usage. Consider them as the following: Civilization is the “being” (thing-become). Culture is the “becoming”.

In short, what he is getting at is this:

• Civilization is what culture becomes. It is its ending.
• This occurs once the cultural spirit is overwritten by the physical/rational mind.
• Rationalism rules once the spirit has fallen away.
• Therefore: the culture is already dead once the civilization stage arrives.

Oswald uses three examples: Rousseau, Socrates, and Buddha. Each of these figures is representative of when a culture turned into a civilization, because each of these figures largely eviscerated (through their movements) centuries of spiritual growth and development by instead presenting every single thing in physicalist, intellectual terms.

What this means is that the culture had finally “become”; it was done becoming. From this point on it would only be decline. Which is accurate, especially with Enlightenment thinkers like Rousseau who lead us to where we are now in clown world.

It is not that these individuals were bad, but that they were pivotal instruments in the transition of culture to its lower form. The intellect and fragile human rationalism now superseded spiritual and cultural intuition.

It is no surprise that now we are in our own decline and worship thinkers like them once again.

As they say: “The intellect comes to rule once the soul has abdicated.”

I see no soul here in the West anymore. It’s all scientism and “experts“. The logical conclusion of the fragile human intellect.

Through Oswald’s work, we once again see that the spirit is higher than the physical. It is more important.

We know the decline is in progress when the physical (rationalism, intellect) rules over the spirit.

This is as true for civilizations as it is for nation-states as it is for humans. All of which are higher-conscious living organisms, which is why they all share the same cycle.

When humans lose the Spirit, they often become hyper-rational. Everything is material and data, which leads them to absolute insane conclusions that I have documented extensively before. It is because the intellect is the lower form. The civilization and nation-states do the same exact thing once they become “Civilizations” according to Oswald’s definition.

Once this system and civilization crashes, do your part to return the spirit. Put down the rationalism and constant secular materialism, and pick up the sword of the spirit. Stop philosophizing everything.

Do this so we may escape the common prejudice of today and return to the higher form of tradition.

-By Kaisar

The post Oswald Spengler: The Decline of the West and Rationalism appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Author’s Note: This is the fourth part in a multi-part series in which I critique the rise of paganism within certain Dissident Right circles, listing the major reasons why I think paganism is a dead end for the Right and that it will only end in disaster.

One of the positive (as opposed to simply antisemitic) arguments the “Pagan Right” gives to support their beliefs is that, by becoming pagan, they are returning to the religion of their forefathers – thus, “honoring their ancestors.” The crux of this argument is that by returning to the old European gods, modern White men can recreate a connection between the ancient past and the current present, one that was severed by a foreign religion like Christianity. In keeping with the running theme of this series, I feel that this argument also misses the mark.

Conquered GodsIn order to understand classical paganism, one must acknowledge this simple concept – the pagan world was a place of “might makes right.” What this meant is that pagan people, when conquered, would often adopt the gods of their conquerors, as conquest was considered proof that the foreign god was, in fact, stronger. In ancient Mesopotamia, the gods would meet at the beginning of each year and decide which cities would be flooded that year. Two points are important in understanding the importance of this: 1) the Tigris and Euphrates flood randomly, meaning that any kind of precautions are very difficult to make, and 2) each city had its own god that it primarily worshiped. What this meant is that the cities with the weaker gods were flooded and those with stronger gods were not. This made it far easier for pagan people, in the long run, to accept gods that were foreign, as these gods had proven themselves to be “stronger.” This is important to understand as it means the gods that are supposedly “native” to a pagan people were typically foreign, as they were the gods of a more powerful tribe/people. There is a reason why pagan Europeans converted as they did, the Christian God proved to be more powerful than their own gods. Hence why Saint Boniface cut down Donar’s Oak. He understood that the tree had a tremendous amount of importance to the pagan Germans, and by cutting it down he could reveal the weakness of their pagan gods. In turn, this made it easier to convert the Germans. This basic concept had already happened in other contexts, the pagans had converted countless times before, and they converted each time they were conquered. “Native” European pagan religions are not deities of your ancestors, but rather their conquerors’ gods.

Which Ancestors?The concept of “honoring my ancestors” raises questions as to which ancestors we are actually talking about. I have many ancestors, but I think I owe more to those I genuinely know about, those I can tell you where they were born, who they married, what they did with their lives, and so on. I owe these ancestors more than my predecessors from over 1,500 years ago. To be frank, I know very little, if anything, about those people, other than reading from the pages of history, and neither do modern pagans. I am beholden to my grandfather; God rest his soul. He was a man who taught me to work with tools and helped instill in me my core values. My great-grandfather died before I was born, but I can tell you much about him, as he made a huge impact on my father. They were both Southern men, and their stories of an unvanquished Dixie, a Dixie that fought bravely to resist Reconstruction, helped bring me to my current political outlook. They made a positive impact on my life in ways I cannot fully comprehend. I can still remember when the Iraq War started, my grandfather was worried sick that, upon turning 18, I would join the military trying to do what he did. I can still remember listening to his World War II stories and wonder if it was his prayers that convinced me not to join. And both men deeply disapproved of heathenry, believing it as both stupid and damnable. If I am going to “honor my ancestors,” why should I side with a bunch of nameless people from Germania instead of my Christian ancestors? The men I know would be distraught by my embrace of paganism, why should I fail to honor them?

Paganism and Dixie?Though I still dislike it, I will admit that the concept of a “Pagan Right” makes more sense in a context of Greek or Norwegian Nationalism (as they were once pagans). Now, there is still the problem I outlined above, aligning with unknown and obscure ancestors from a thousand years ago over your Christian grandparents. But, at least a Greek or Norwegian pagan can truthfully say that they were once pagans. I cannot. I am a Southerner, and Southerners were never pagans. From the very beginnings of the Southern nation, Jamestown in 1607 and Charleston in 1620, Dixie was always Christian. Of course, the South has changed over time. Although a minority today, the Colonial South was actually Anglican dominated. The Evangelical churches that now command Dixie were much slower to develop; even as recently as the early 1900s, Methodists had the upper hand. It was not until the 20th century, and especially after World War II, that the Baptists really began to take over Dixie. There has also been a long-standing Catholic presence, especially along the Gulf Coast and in Maryland. The nature of Christianity may have gradually changed in the South, and Dixie cannot claim to have a single religious identity, like Spain (Catholicism) or Russia (Orthodoxy). However, the South was never pagan. Because I am a Southerner, paganism is every bit as foreign to me as Islam or Buddhism. To try and “rebuild” paganism in Dixie would not be a renovation at all, but the imposition of a foreign religion and one that would completely change the very character of the Southland. Just as an Islamic Dixie would cease to be Dixie, so would a pagan Dixie.

Why Odin?There are many different “schools” of paganism, but by far the most popular is Odinism, the attempted revival of pagan Norse mythology. The rationale behind this is pretty easy to figure out, the “Pagan Right” overlaps quite a bit with the cringier and LARPer bits of National Socialism; and since there is a heavy emphasis on Nordic traits within National Socialism, it makes sense that they would gravitate toward the religion of the ancient Nordics. This is why there tends to be so much emphasis on heavily mythicized Viking iconography. Coming from actual Scandinavians this is still ridiculous, but it is even more hilarious when it comes from someone with minimal, if any, Nordic blood. To me, it also raises an interesting question as to why I would want to honor my Odin-worshipping ancestors. As stated before, I am a Southerner, and Southerners were never pagan. But even if I could be convinced to drop that identity and focus purely on race, Odinism would still have some unique problems. Racially, I am Anglo-Celtic, and the actual Vikings, not a bunch of out-of-shape cosplayers, raided and burned down Anglo-Celtic villages throughout the Viking Age. They raped Anglo-Celtic women. If we really are going with the “honoring my ancestors” bit, why should I admire people who pillaged my villages and raped my women? Even if we were to ignore my status as a racial Anglo-Celtic and focus on a broader White identity, we would still have this same problem, as the Vikings did much of the same throughout Europe. Unless you are actually Scandinavian, you are not “honoring your ancestors” by worshiping Odin; instead, you’re worshipping the god of men that ransacked a poor village in England.

Christianity Does not Require You to Hate Your AncestorsChristianity did not, as Islam did, declare everything that came before it as an “Era of Ignorance.” Christianity did not declare what the pagans created as evil simply because the pagans made it. Rather, it took care to review what was wicked about a particular pagan culture; in turn, Christians jettisoned what was sinful and other elements that were not evil could remain. Christianity met the Greco-Roman world by making ample use of its philosophical and legal traditions and did so from the very beginning. The writings of Saint Paul demonstrate a mind that was deeply familiar with the Greek philosophic tradition. This same process would later continue when the Germanic pagans were converted. In a hypothetical world where China is converted in 200-300 years from now, this same process will likely play out again. A complete rejection of thousands of years of Chinese culture and history will not occur, instead those elements that are evil will be rejected while other components will remain – incorporated into a Christianized China. When your ancestors converted, they were not asked to turn their backs on everything that had come before them. Yes, certain parts of their culture had to be eliminated, but this was not true for every aspect of their old pagan culture. What remained were the best parts of that culture, be it Greco-Roman, Germanic, or, God willing in the future, Chinese. What remained of the old culture was its best parts. The emphasis on an anti-nationalist form of Christianity, particularly since 1945, has tended to obscure this trend. However, the fact is, Christianity does allow for national distinctions to remain within certain limits.

The Pagans ConvertedThe “Pagan Right” misunderstands why the pagans converted in the first place, and their explanations are frequently contradictory with their overall project. It was not that they were bribed nor were they forced by Christian warlords. Rather, it was because their pagan worldview was shattered, and Christianity offered something they could believe in again. Contra Edward Gibbon, the Roman Empire had lost its civic virtue well before the rise of Christianity. Long-term decadence had already set in, and they had stopped having any real belief in their old Roman gods. The Roman Empire, on the eve of Constantine, was functionally atheistic. Christianity did not end a rational era, the age of Greco-Roman advancement was long over, it gave them something new they could believe in. This same process would repeat itself when the Germanic pagans were converted. Your pagan ancestors were not weak when they became Christian, far from it. They became Christian because they saw its truths. Far from ending the glories of Rome, Christianity was instrumental in keeping it going and helped birth two empires – the Frankish and Byzantine – which would prove decisive in curtailing the Islamization of Europe. The pagan Europeans understood this and were grateful, creating another factor that led to their Christianization. The best way to honor your pagan ancestors is to do as they did, convert.

“Neo-pagans have sometimes forgotten, when they set out to do everything that the old pagans did, that the final thing the old pagans did was to get christened.”

G.K. Chesterton

For Whites, our ancestors, at least the ones who have made an important impact on our lives, were Christians. It is them we should honor, and not by embracing something like “All-Father” paganism, with ravens and runes. Your Southern (or even Heritage American) ancestors would have found that utterly abhorrent. The old pagan impulses in the West are now but a faint whisper, and long ago the best aspects of that prior culture were already incorporated by Christians.

We cannot “honor our ancestors” by believing in Thor. We can by doing what the vast majority of them did, following in Christ.

The post Against Paganism, Part 4: Honor Your Ancestors appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

One paradigm for understanding our times is that we’re ruled by a plutocracy rooted in international finance that’s both evil and insane. We can observe the results of our unfortunate situation escalate in real time. As they pile up, the competence of the professionals who serve this plutocracy (they generally don’t seem to understand that) is going down.

The inverse relationship reflects the contradictory objectives of this plutocracy itself, to which the professionals simply comply. It’s my theory that one reason for their incompetence is the compliance itself. I mean that both in the mentality of one needed to comply and the information they’re being fed to keep it instilled. Today, I offer a protracted explanation of my sentiments, best known colloquially as a “rant.”

Take the military, for instance. It’s been utilized for over two decades of failure in continuous Zionist warfare. When things really kicked off under Bush, there was a process of ridding itself of anyone with the competence to understand that this agenda was crazy and the courage to speak out about it. Yeah, the U.S. military used to have officers who’d do that sort of thing. Under Obama, the focus of purging turned to anyone who wouldn’t go along with devious social engineering.

WATCH: Gen. Milley says Russia has already lost the war in Ukraine, adding, "you just don't conquer countries that are free." https://t.co/RdYLvfum24 pic.twitter.com/jifFMB9bR6

— MSNBC (@MSNBC) February 24, 2023

This is how we arrive at Gen. Mark Milley, a scumbag with a total disregard for the lives of those under his command. The process selects for characters like him who will tell whatever lie required because it can’t balance the need for competence with the demand for senior officers willing to go along with evil. If they can retain somebody good by traditional standards, probably the best they can hope for is that he wants to stick it out for at least 20 years to qualify for a pension. A lot of my friends fall in this category.

When Russia intervened in Ukraine, Phase One required them to take heavy casualties including brigadier generals and colonels who lead from the front in the officer-heavy Russian Army. It would be impossible not to do so given the sheer size and modern firepower of the Ukrainian military. The U.S. has never had to deal with anything like it. This wasn’t evidence they were losing. Anybody provided with a military education during the Cold War would’ve told you that a massive land conflict with Russia on its border was a lunatic proposition.

A couple objectives of this initial phase were to keep Ukrainian units stuck in their current locations while Mariupol and the territory connecting Crimea with the new republics was secured. The Ukrainian military was much larger than the Russian forces engaging it. This would’ve caused significant problems if units could be redeployed to thwart the main thrust of Phase One, which was happening in the south, not up north in Kiev where the Russians parked a column to tie down its massive garrison with a distraction.

In a Kyiv under siege, neighbors dig trenches and raise barriers to brace for Russian assault https://t.co/83TT3yhZg4

— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) March 1, 2022

Everyone keeps using the word “siege” when even a medieval knight could tell you that if an army didn’t try to surround and enter a city, ’twas no siege. It was a successful feint, that’s it. The region securing Crimea has since been fortified into a nightmare for a “counter offensive” against it by the third army NATO has managed to cobble together with equipment it will never be able to adequately supply or maintain. It’s being sent to get blown up anyways, so I suppose it doesn’t really matter.

After Phase One, the Russians settled into a strategy of using artillery, cruise missiles, and lofted airstrikes to destroy the Ukrainian military from a safe distance. Glide bomb sorties are now carried out daily, as well. Close fighting is usually done by the militias and Wagner Group in small fire teams in order to clear out positions which have been pounded beforehand. Large groups of anyone or anything is a bad idea given the firepower and surveillance capabilities involved in this conflict.

When the Ukrainians come forward to make direct contact, the Russians will often pull back to utilize this opportunity to slaughter them now that they’ve been brought out in the open, en masse while conserving their own men who’d be put in danger fighting this way. It’s then marketed as a victorious counter offensive when really it’s a senseless massacre on land that will revert back to the Russians after the war is over. The two previous armies were decimated. That’s why they’re having to put a third together.

None of this is hard to understand and I really don’t see much acknowledgment of the fact that the other side might actually know what it’s doing. The view that the Russians are nefarious, bungling cowards fighting with a bunch of junk seems to govern the American assessment of what’s going on, as well as this idea that everything in Russia is falling apart like it’s the 1990s. The level of contemporary and historical ignorance is really frightening.

Get a detailed look at the #Russian military’s shoddy command structure for the ongoing invasion of #Ukraine via a new analysis published Sunday evening by analysts at the Institute for the Study of War.https://t.co/gxtK2WZ9vD

Sunday's Assessment: https://t.co/rzZptY50r1

— ISW (@TheStudyofWar) May 1, 2023

It doesn’t help that they’re fed a steady diet of nonsense. There are also these myriad critical thinking points that don’t seem to trigger any of these military professionals. For example, if a country can produce a hypersonic missile which flies so hot and fast it creates a plasma field in front of it before striking the target at Mach 15, are they so stupid and poorly-equipped that they’re sending conscripts forward in human wave attacks to get killed in a 10-1 turkey shoot? How are they able to coordinate the launch of hundreds of other sophisticated cruise missiles at a time from a variety of platforms if they suffer from organizational incompetence? If they’re so shoddy, how have they sustained a ground operation much bigger than what the U.S. could undertake in Mexico for this long?

I’d love to go to a conference room and berate them with these questions all day. That’s the level of contradictions being embraced. It’s like asserting that a man is a danger to society because his 65 IQ makes him prone to impulsive violence while admitting he stole billions through complex white-collar crimes.

I see this propaganda about how they’re so desperate they’re using old T-54s to send these conscripts to their deaths. Can anybody scratch their head for a second and wonder about another possible explanation? The Russians can produce or refurbish over 1,000 tanks per month. They have a city-sized industrial complex for this purpose deep in the interior of the country.

As it turns out, these tanks use a different caliber of shell than all the others. The Soviets stockpiled it in WW3 quantities. They’re being handed over to the militias for indirect fire missions. The commander can watch the rounds hit in real time via drone footage and correct fire accordingly. They’re a dirt-cheap artillery platform, not a measure of desperation. It seems like we’re producing leaders who are only capable of interpreting things according to a narrative. That’s very dangerous.

Underlying all of this seems to be a couple of things besides the fact that they’re fed disinformation. First, this mentality that something is true because it was told to you by an expert or authority figure. Things that don’t make sense aren’t true because they told you without providing any plausible explanation or evidence. COVID proved that at least half of the population can’t comprehend this principle, so probably military officers are no different. That could be especially really true for anyone willing to do more than his minimum time at this point.

The other is this notion of “the right side of history.” It’s not a coincidence that an organization like the U.S. Army gripped by woke insanity switched its uniforms back to WW2 so everyone can feel like they defeated the Nazis. I think they have to tell themselves they’re the good guys serving their country because they can’t see the obvious, which is that the U.S. military has been harnessed for fundamentally nefarious purposes by evil people to whom our country means nothing.

I’ve heard the Taiwan situation described as a set of problems to solve. These are fundamentally not solvable problems in the sense that we could pursue these solutions and maintain a functioning civilization in America. Nobody stops to consider what a horrific disaster the project in Ukraine has been when they’re coming up with these idiotic scenarios.

What they’re doing now is switching to the narrative about how things are tough for Ukraine but they’re inflicting horrendous casualties on the Russians despite admitting that there’s an enormous differential in firepower. The absurdity of this contradiction is mind blowing and if the majority of U.S. officers find it plausible, we’d be better off getting rid of everything but the Coast Guard.

I’m starting to think the difference between a dissident and a normal man is that when we’re lied to all the time we get pissed off and want to point out the truth. Our counterparts would rather believe the nonsense or shrug it off because emotionally they can’t handle the implications of the fact that they’re being lied to all the time. It’s just a theory, but maybe.

If you serve in an organization that can send you to get killed, perhaps you’re much better off not feeling as if the leadership is ignorant, incompetent, and up to no good. I’m not writing this to denigrate anyone’s military service. My point here is that when you combine utterly insane objectives with officers willing to go along with them because “they’re the good guys,” this is how the train runs off the rails.

The U.S. is wiring Ukraine with sensors that can detect‌‌ bursts of radiation from a nuclear weapon and can confirm the identity of the attacker. If Russia detonates a radioactive weapon on Ukrainian soil, the technology could verify Moscow’s culpability. https://t.co/2YJXKhnAFn

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 28, 2023

It’s rather alarming that now they’re sending teams to Ukraine in order to detect nuclear activity and identify it as Russian ahead of an offensive in which tens of thousands of Ukrainian lives will be sacrificed for headlines to frame a narrative about how they’ve got the Russians bled white and on the run. That would be a lovely explanation for why those dastardly Russians resorted to a WMD. We’ve been through this WMD stuff before, what it was used to justify, and how that turned out. The patterns, guys…. please!

If you start from the premise that Ukraine is not winning and the U.S. needs some way to freeze this conflict for a later date, the worst possible outcomes start looking more likely. A brilliant plan to save the Ukraine project could easily turn into a WW3-type escalation when you realize they’ll need something really intense to frighten the Russians into backing off (who’ve promised to escalate instead) rather than taking every inch they want from a failed state. The U.S. is faced with the catastrophic implosion of the entire enterprise, so desperate times might call for desperate measures.

Russian politicians have been adamant that they’ll pursue a comprehensive solution and that they’re prepared for this to take years. They’d never just accept a deal to stay where they’re at and have a ceasefire like the U.S. wants. That wouldn’t solve the political objective of reuniting all the Russian areas nor would it solve the security objective of permanently removing the threat NATO has built for the purpose of collapsing the Russian Federation. They’ll never get the Russians to take another screw job like the Minsk Accords ever again.

Angela Merkel to @zeitonline: “#MinskAgreements were an attempt to give Ukraine time” – a cynical confession serving as further proof that #Ukraine had no intention to implement Minsk, while the West had no intention to persuade it in doing so and stop the violence in #Donbass. pic.twitter.com/l0oOY8hx0e

— Russian Embassy, UK (@RussianEmbassy) December 9, 2022

The issue is clearly that just like blowing up Nord Stream or provoking this “unprovoked invasion” in the first place, there doesn’t seem to be anybody at the Pentagon willing to resign and speak out. It doesn’t look like there’s anyone in the pipeline, either. I know this is turning into a rant, but I talk to guys with graduate degrees in the U.S. military who can’t figure out what the fuck is actually going on in Ukraine. They can’t even figure out that we started it. Meanwhile, I talk to former officers from Central America who have no problem recognizing reality. That doesn’t bode well for us at all.

The men and material for an offensive have to be assembled in the rear ahead of time, which concentrates them into convenient clusters, often in the middle of a muddy morass. Apparently, Ukraine was hit with a missile strike of unprecedented size earlier this week targeting these concentrations. This would indicate the Ukrainians are gearing up for their third suicide operation, which the media keeps telling us will happen soon. If there is some WMD false flag, it could transpire in the near future. All we can do is wait and see.

On a side note, things aren’t looking too bright from the enlisted aspect of things, too. They’re pushing through imbeciles. The DOD has long established with very good statistics they can’t be trained to adequately perform tasks required of a soldier or even follow orders consistently. This one’s headed off to AIT to become a fire control specialist. How heartwarming. I genuinely don’t want anything bad to happen to U.S. personnel, but it really seems like we’ve got a perfect storm shaping up.

In January 2023, Collins went to the FSPC to participate in the Academic Skills Development Program. While getting paid, he worked with instructors and teachers to improve his arithmetic reasoning, word knowledge, paragraph comprehension, and mathematics. pic.twitter.com/c67W8d3gbO

— U.S. Army Recruiting (@usarec) April 28, 2023

The post Compliance vs Competence: A Rant appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’ve been watching and listening to the current debate, conversation, and all out mudslinging among my Christian brothers, and the false ones, on the idea of Christian Nationalism. Let me be very honest, I want every nation of man to convert to the One Trinitarian God: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, as revealed in the pages of the Holy Scriptures, both the Old and New Testament. For there is no god but Jehovah, creator of all things, every molecule held in place by His Divine power, and every man subject to His divine will. And one would suspect that every person that named Christ would want the same, fulfilling the “Our Father” (Papist), “Lord’s Prayer” (Protestants), with “thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on Earth as it is in heaven.” However, it is not so, and the debate has left me somewhat befuddled.

As God is sovereign over all things, it makes absolute sense that His divine purpose would be that all men submit to His authority in all things. This would include, but not be limited to, all governments, and I would suppose those promoting a Christian Nationalist view would agree on this point. However, the opposition, and I’m talking about Christians, seem to prefer something else, a nation state not constitutionally bound in obedience to the Almighty, but to a secular ideal of sort. How interesting?

There is nothing new under the sun, and we’ve seen this over and over again in the Bible, and especially with the kings of Israel and the kings of Judah. They were all supposed to live in subjection to the laws given by Moses, not just the Ten Commandments, but also all those contained in the Pentateuch. It was a divinely given religious and governmental system that was to rule the children of the Most High. However, they never seemed to live up to those expectations. Even the good kings always seemed to stop just short.

In the theocracy of the Israelites, there were “high places,” places of worship, that the children of Israel would escape to. They would worship the sex gods of the pagans and partake in the degenerate practices of such religions, which involved ritual orgies, temple prostitution (all genders included), and even the sacrificial offerings of children to these gods. They wanted Jehovah Nationalism, but only if they could keep a few things left untouched. Seems reasonable, except it eventually brought national destruction and the expulsion of their nation off the land to which they were covenantally bound.

We can observe this same scenario playing out in the current debate over Christian Nationalism. And if we are to be honest, those Christians in opposition really just want the high places kept up, in case they ever want to have a wild weekend, or so their “god” won’t offend their godless neighbors.

Let me mention a few hot button issues of today, those that would require complete compliance to the laws of God in a Christian nation. And, this is a very short list.

Example: Abortion I remember when abortion was the law of the land; certain “Pro-Life” groups, including their denominational allies, regularly called abortion murder, and as the Bible clearly states, murder is a capital offense. However, when the states were restored their legal sovereign right to legislate abortion and, therefore, make abortion a capital offense, many anti-abortion activists flinched at calling for infanticidal women (and men), or abortion providers, to be charged with capital punishment. Remember, they fought for years and years to save the lives of children, praying to God for victory over this hellish procedure. Then, when Our Divine Majesty gives them everything they want, they backtrack on the implementation of a just punishment for the murder of unborn children.

Example: HomosexualityBelieve it or not, but sodomy and other homosexual acts were once illegal, not just in public, but even in the privacy of one’s home. If discovered, practitioners of such acts could go to jail. But that seemed unkind, although under the laws of God, it is also a capital offense. So, states and courts changed the laws, no longer making that which God calls vile and unnatural a chargeable wrongdoing. In modern America, our laws no longer subdue evil for the benefit of society, but our godless culture promotes every type of sexually deviant behavior all over the world. We even sacrifice our nation’s children, mutilating their genitalia, dressing them up as sex objects for pedophiles, and constantly using the media to propagandize them to the point they doubt their own biology! Unfortunately, a great majority of “Christians” stay silent, and even attend parades, story book hours, and fake weddings for these wicked demons, as a display of showing them “acts of love.”

So, let me offer a constructive thought for the first part of what might be a few articles.

For those who want the Remnant of this “nation” to be Christian, as I do, which is why I am a Southern Nationalist, you’re going to have to make hard choices. The main choice you are going to make is to stop identifying as an American, it is an arm of a satanic global empire that is irredeemable. Christian Nationalism will never work in these United States, it’s just too big. However, it can work in states, counties, small towns, and even some smaller cities, and I’ll expand in the next article.

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post A Christian Nation or Heavenly Rebellion? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

A friend of mine is a true COVID believer, even to the point of reprimanding me for my flippant attitude on the matter and endangering everyone else by doing unvaccinated socializing. I showed his texts to another ID writer who concluded this must’ve been the writings of a hysterical woman. My friend’s wife got her first injection and was promptly afflicted with a really bad case of chickenpox. She’d already had it as a kid. At that point, I found it very alarming to watch this process play out in real time with the people in my life. She still got the next shot.

She’s now experiencing heart issues and has an appointment with an oncologist because they’re having a lot of trouble trying to figure out what’s wrong with this poor lady. Her opinion basically is “it sucks to get old.” Okay, yes it does. However, it’s not routine for someone at the age of 40 to have these problems. People simply can’t admit to themselves that they were led astray, led others astray, or demanded that others go astray or have their lives wrecked. When you’re on the wrong side of the truth, it can be emotionally destructive to admit. I assume most of them never will.

“We have to get away from the blame game,” says Dr. Anthony Fauci. Shutdowns were necessary, he adds, but some “schools stayed closed far too long.”

That said, he says the school where his daughter taught shut down for two weeks and “they didn’t do too badly.” pic.twitter.com/DlPnWShomj

— Christiane Amanpour (@amanpour) April 28, 2023

I had the benefit of a religious education, but lacked a crystal clear logical and spiritual sense of things until the injections started and all of these kids were turned into trannies. As someone who’s been at the dissident thing for a while, my biggest fear was not that the truth would never assert itself, but that this would only occur in terms of the consequences.

After all, Christ showed up and they murdered him for his trouble. Things have been rather fraught ever since. However, the reality is that his path was taken deliberately with the foreknowledge of what would happen. He was making a point about our existence rather than sitting back to relax and sparing himself any extreme pain. This much is clear, but he also said that he knows a lot of things that we don’t. That’s something we have to accept.

However, the principles to govern our conduct on Earth were elucidated as well as the fact that nobody is equipped to make the best choice every time. I’m not trying to provide a theological treatise here or implying that I’m some expert. This is just my own take on the matter that’s been developed through dealing with evil and insanity and wishing that things could just be reasonable before I realized that’s not how any of this is going to play out.

What I’m trying to articulate is that if you know what to do from his example, then you need to apply this to the troubles you encounter. There’s going to be a Final Judgement when everyone is going to get what’s coming to them. Nobody’s wealth, status, or perception by others is going to spare them from it. This is something that used to be quite well known, and was thus the subject of vivid medieval art. For instance, The Last Judgement by Marx Reichlich (1490) does a nice job of conveying the situation’s gravity.

How are these people like Fauci or Bill Gates going to be able to answer for what they’ve done? I don’t know but I really wouldn’t want to be in their position on that day. It’s also known that you need to forgive other people in order to receive it yourself. This can be a real struggle but it’s absolutely critical to overcome. In other words, I’m not writing this article to suggest that they should go to Hell. You shouldn’t do that for anyone.

The truth will become known but that’s going to take time and probably lots of other unpleasantries along the way. We’re seeing that now with COVID and the fact that these people have no way to defend themselves. They’re at the point where they’ve resorted to censoring presidential candidates on prime-time national television.

ABC News aired a heavily censored interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., claiming that his remarks about COVID vaccines could not be aired. It is unclear what his actual claims were because he was censored.

pic.twitter.com/SbAZSmHGZ9

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) April 28, 2023

Although COVID was a novel form of evil and insanity to be put through, there are many such cases. You’ve got to do what you know is right in each and understand that many people don’t know the right thing to do or can’t follow your course of action. For example, many men had to roll the dice with these injections because otherwise they couldn’t provide for their families or genuinely believed that was how to keep them safe.

I’m not writing this to congratulate myself for not getting injections. While my experience with COVID was rather dicey (like thrown in a gulag on a European military base dicey) nobody confronted me with an ultimatum about getting fired. What I’m trying to say is that in the end, the lies will save no one.

We are thrilled that our mRNA #COVID19 #vaccine won a Vaccine Industry Excellence award at the 2023 The World Vaccine Congress. #WVCUSA #WVC2023 #ViEAwards pic.twitter.com/5IXir0Aktf

— Moderna (@moderna_tx) April 28, 2023

It’s not going to save them. The post The Blame Game appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Harmonica has been writing some good essays on Christianity, heathenism, and Europe that have become necessary as apostasy spreads over the West. The mentioning of Charlemagne got things a bit offtrack, however. The key passage is this one, from Part 3 of the series:

“The real origins of the West do not reside in Plato’s Athens, but rather in Charlemagne’s Carolingian Empire. It was at this point where all three of the West’s major influences, the Classical world, Christianity, and Germanic culture, all cohesively came together.”

In a sense, he is correct: the founding of the Carolingian Empire was the beginning of something new, but not in the positive sense – rather, in the sense of a deviation from what is true and right. For Charlemagne swerved away from universal Christian teaching in two major ways, both of which have led the West to the decrepit state she is in now. First, he rejected the decision of the Seventh Ecumenical (Universal) Council of 787 A.D., which upheld the veneration of icons of the Lord Jesus Christ and of the saints and angels. Second, he unlawfully modified the Nicene Creed, so that the Holy Spirit is said to proceed from the Father and the Son, rather than simply from the Father as the original version approved by the Second Ecumenical Council (+381) reads.

By rejecting the Seventh Council at the Frankfurt Synod (+794), Charlemagne rejected an essential teaching about Jesus Christ, rejected His full humanity. In rejecting the veneration of Christ in icons, he belittled the human nature of Christ. But the Lord Jesus, being fully God and fully man, is 1) able to be depicted in icons, mosaics, etc., and 2) receives honor when men and women venerate His holy image. This distortion of belief and practice by Charlemagne disincarnates Christ, separates us from Him by making Him a shadowy ghost somewhere up in the heavens rather than the God-man Whom we may see, taste, touch, kiss, etc. These falsehoods that have uglified Christ turn people away from Christianity and cause them to seek out pagan alternatives.

But this is not his most serious error. His addition of the Filioque (‘and the Son’) to the Nicene Creed, which deformed the true Apostolic teaching of the Holy Trinity, is what has truly devastated the West. Dr. Joseph Farrell in the foreword to his magnum opus God, History, and Dialectic: The Theological Foundations of the Two Europes and Their Cultural Consequences goes into some of the details. What follows are a just a few of the highlights:

“These essays are about the Two Europes and the Three Trinities on which they are based. The first Trinity is the Holy Trinity of classical Christian doctrine, uncorrupted by its Augustinian formulation, the Trinity of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost. As the first term of the second Trinity is St. Augustine of Hippo’s Dialectical Formulation of the Holy Trinity; as the second term of the second trinity is the History which that dialectical formula-tion moulded and shaped, and as the third term of the second trinity are the divisions which resulted from the application of Augustine’s trinitarian dialectics in History, the resulting schisms of “Europe” into First Europe, Second Europe, and Russia. The causes for the Second Europe’s tripartite division of History into its Ancient, Mediaeval, and Modern Ages is thus to be credited to St. Augustine’s dialectical formulation of the Trinity. This transub-stantiation of the Trinity from a revealed Mystery to a dialectical deduction, and finally, to a dialectical process at work within History is simply unintelligible without Augustine. In the thirteenth century, Joa-chim of Floris’ Age of the Father, Age of the Son, and (coming) Age of the Spirit, or Petrarch’s or Gibbon’s Golden Age, Dark Age, and Renaissance, or Hegel’s well-known Thesis, Antithesis, and Synthesis, or Comte’s “superstitious, metaphysical, and scientific” periods, and finally, our own superficially academic and objective divisions of Ancient, Mediaeval, and Modern “History” are but tired exhausted reworkings of the original heresy which split the Latin Church from Eastern Orthodoxy and created the Two Europes. The Second Europe’s historiography, even in its most avowedly secular form, Marxism, is thus one of many logical implications and inevitabilities of the Augustinizing of doctrine which took place from the fifth to the ninths centuries in the Christian West.

… In the ironies of historical development, one encounters the Two Hellenizations being formally adopted and accepted by the Two Europes at approximately the same time, in the ninth century. In that space and in that time, they clash openly for the first time, and the ikon of that clash, with all its attendant historiographical implications, is the coronation of Charlemagne by Pope Leo III in 800 A.D. As we shall see, tragically the Second Europe is incapable even of interpreting Pope Leo’s actions or activities with anything like consistency, and that fact will highlight the first occurrence of a persisting problem in Second European historiography, for the clash more than anything else will demonstrate that it was the East’s which was the original Christian orthodoxy and civilization, and that the West of Charlemagne constituted the departure and digres-sion. We will fail entirely to understand the alarm of a St. Photius later in that century, or the careful diplomacy of a Leo III at the beginning of it, or the monumental hubris of a Pope Nicholas I, if we do not penetrate to their ultimate theological origins. Indeed, we shall see that the fact that the Second, Augustinized Europe of the West should come to view itself as the canon of “Judeo-Christian civilization” is the result of that departure and clash, and of the growth in its own eyes of its status as the canonical measure of what is genuinely “Christian” or “European” civilization stems ultimately from the Carolingian equation of Augustinism with its own imperial orthodoxy and ambitions. Even the massive historical systems of a Hegel or Toynbee are the products of this assumption…”

The overemphasis of Charlemagne, the Franks, and others on Saint Augustine’s teachings brings us to our present pagan revival. Dr. Farrell continues:

“For Augustine the bishop and Augustinism the system are two different things. Augustine the bishop insisted, no less vigorously than his great counterparts in Cappadocia—Sts. Basil of Caesaria, Gregory of Nyssa, and Gregory of Nazianzus—on the direct continuity of the Church with the ancient Hebrews and with the cultural autonomy conferred on them by God. But Augustine the Hellenizer erected a system founded upon a continuity of theology with Greek philosophy, a continuity of incalculable enormity: the identification of The One (to en) of Greek philosophy with the One God and Father of Christian doctrine. That marriage of Theology and Philosophy occurred not at some secondary level of doctrine, but at the core, at the height, of all Christian belief, the doctrine of God Himself. So long as this cohabitation went undetected and unchallenged, so long did its hidden implications take root, grow, and eventually overwhelm and choke the Christian component. Our current moral and spiritual crisis is the result of that marriage, and will not be resolved until the churches which persist in it, beginning with Rome, repent and recant the error. For Augustine saw discontinuity with that Graeco-pagan world, but the theologians, philosophers, and humanists who came after him and who were the heirs of his system, came increasingly to see continuity.

Thus, at its core the Second Europe is pagan, for it worships a pagan definition of God, pagan, for it is crumbling from within, overladen [sic., i.e., “overlaid”.– A.F.] only with an increasingly thin and superficial veneer of a Christian idiom.”

Prior to Charlemagne, there was one Christian oikoumene (‘inhabited world’), but he broke it apart with his weaponized theology for the sake of building an empire of his own. This is not the happy beginning of a glorious West, but the sorrowful start of her slow death. Instead of spending their time extolling him, the Western European peoples should go about finding ways to rebuild the bridges he burned between the West and the Orthodox Church. We understand that some of this may sound unkind, but we assure everyone it is offered only out of concern for the well-being of the West. In that same spirit of friendship, we invite whoever is interested to read further if they have questions about these crucial subjects:

-Fr John Romanides’s overview of the Franks and Charlemagne and their break with the Christian Roman Empire: http://www.romanity.org/htm/rom.03.en.franks_romans_feudalism_and_doctrine.01.htm

-Dr Farrell’s introduction to St Photios’s Mystagogy, which delves more deeply into the pagan theological distortions that have entered the West via the Augustinianism of the Franks: http://www.anthonyflood.com/farrellphotios.htm

-Fr John Strickland’s web site and books about the split between East and West: https://johnstrickland.org/, https://www.ancientfaith.com/contributors/john_strickland

-St Seraphim Rose (+1982) gives a superb overview of the Western spiritual malady in his Orthodox Survival Course (links to the text and audio versions are at the end of the article):https://www.rooshv.com/the-orthodox-survival-course-by-father-seraphim-rose

-By Walt Garlington

The post Second Thoughts about Charlemagne appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Asia is a place where I’ve done a lot of business, especially the east. It’s a complicated region. China is by far the largest country, and historically it doesn’t get along too well with Japan. Taiwan, legally the Republic of China, gets along very well with Japan, however. What all three parties agree on is that the Koreans are hot-tempered people who don’t know their place.

As far as North Korea is concerned, the chance that it would try to conquer the South is zero. It doesn’t even have the resources for such an endeavor. North Korea wants the U.S. not to attack it, which became its primary concern after the era of neocon invasions began following the Cold War. Fair enough.

One theory holds that the U.S. would like to do so, in order to then deploy its military assets right to the border of China. Another is that it’s fine using the situation to keep them in the current locations. Hopefully, the second one is more plausible, seeing as moving troops towards the Chinese border would trigger military action, no matter how ill-prepared they might be for it. That’s what happened during the Korean War.

'As specific steps for the deterrence, the U.S. will send an Ohio-class nuclear submarine to South Korea. The dispatch of such a submarine to South Korea is the first since early 1980 during the Cold War, the official said.'https://t.co/ErHvbY4ovg

— Yuka C Koshino | 越野 結花 (@YukaKoshino) April 26, 2023

As far as a nuclear attack, the last place they’d decided to nuke is the South, which they consider to be their own country under a foreign military occupation. Tokyo would probably be the target, and there wouldn’t be a shortage of South Koreans cheering it on. They really hate the Japanese, who are justifiably quite alarmed about the North Korea situation.

The other two countries bordering North Korea, China and Russia, aren’t too thrilled about the situation either, especially the nuclear tests which could trigger a radioactive landslide. The Chinese have erected extensive border security measures, fearing a mass influx of refugees should the regime collapse. Clearly, they view this as high-potential scenario. Once things kicked off in Ukraine, the Russians basically said, “this would be a good time for our friends in North Korea to test some of those missiles.” Medvedev disclosed this in an interview last year.

As for South Korea, if it was up to the average person, the U.S. military would be gone. They understand they’re being cynically exploited much better than the Taiwanese. Nobody living in a homogeneous, low crime nation would want the U.S. military to occupy it with diversity. That’s especially true in a very nationalistic place that finds it highly objectionable for their women to be sleeping with foreigners, particularly the black ones.

There’s also no enthusiasm for absorbing the North. The West/East German divide was much shorter and far less drastic than what’s happened to Korea. Still, it was an enormous economic and financial challenge to reunite Germany. South Korea probably couldn’t afford to do that with the North. So, even if the government fell in with the North, it would still probably end up as a separate zone of some kind, perhaps indefinitely.

Trump had a really good idea in making a deal with Kim on the nuclear issues. It would’ve ratcheted down tensions with China and removed one of the primary justifications for keeping all of these American troops abroad, rather than on our own border with Mexico. Kim was fine with not devoting so many resources to nukes in exchange for a new status quo in which the U.S. wouldn’t try to regime change him. Yeah, it would’ve been a master stroke of statesmanship that would’ve bolstered Trump’s popularity with voters.

As it turns out, Trump was rather naive in thinking he could hijack a political system that belongs to a plutocracy without consequences and do something that made common sense. His own administration wouldn’t even allow it. All it took to blow the whole thing was that nutjob John Bolton announcing that Kim would be getting the same deal as Qaddafi.

You might recall that Qaddafi had made productive deals with the West, such as stopping African migrants in exchange for a relatively trivial sum of money and agreeing not to produce WMDs in exchange for security guarantees. In return, a revolution was fomented in Libya and it was bombarded. He ended up sodomized to death with a bayonet on television. What was once one of the best places to be an average citizen in the Arab world is a failed state and a massive percentage of them are dead.

My assessment is that Mr. Kim has a pretty reasonable set of concerns that he’s attempting to address with his missile and nuke program. Moreover, both sides of Korea could peacefully come to whatever arrangement they arrived at if left alone. Of course, Uncle Sam won’t leave this situation alone until it literally explodes. Perhaps they’re thinking they can provoke a conflict that will suck China in again, so there’s a viable justification to really kick things off. The entire geopolitical situation is so insane at this point that anything is possible.

On Basco Island South of #Taiwan, U.S. Military Prepares for Conflict With #China

Part of the largest-ever annual drills with the Philippines focuses on defending the strategic Bashi Channel, a key waterway used by the #PLA Navy to access the open ocean.https://t.co/bE7wZPyau4

— Indo-Pacific News – Geo-Politics & Military News (@IndoPac_Info) April 25, 2023

The post Korean Drama appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Recently, I wrote an article about my experience with Taiwan and the invasion prospects. On a lighter note, a local I’d met explained to me about how Taiwanese can take each other to civil court for insults. The penalties for each specific insult are codified in the law. For example, if you called a man the “son of a whore” he could be awarded several hundred dollars even if, in fact, this was his mother’s profession. My favorite was the term “shameless stinky bitch.”

That part of the world is pervaded by a deep shame culture. In one of these countries, my endeavor was hit with a substantial fine. I had to pay the government through an in-person bank transaction. While I was sitting at the clerk’s desk, she saw the paperwork, got wide-eyed and walked to the manager’s desk behind her. As she whispered in his ear, he looked over at me with a dim stare and nodded his head.

By the time she returned with the documents to sign, everyone else in the back was staring at me and whispering to each other. I could literally feel the shame. If politicians and celebrities are hit with scandal over there, they have to do slow, solemn-faced bows in front of a horde of clicking cameras to demonstrate their contrition. It’s a real thing that works on people from all walks of life. The North Koreans take it pretty far, but that’s the nature of them. I wouldn’t recommend sending your kid on a school trip.

Probably a significant reason China isn’t doing the pride stuff is the CCP understands that without shame, not enough people would be restrained by their conscience to keep society from falling apart. This would also explain why they’ve developed a social credit system to punish city dwellers for things a villager would be ashamed of, like not caring for elderly parents. In the anonymity of a big city, the shame just doesn’t stick anymore. That’s led to a lot of problems for them.

This could be a scenario for my post-collapse retirement. “Tom? He’s the old hermit who live out beyond the dunes.“In a Western context, it’s closer to the force from that original Star Wars movie. A primordial energy from a more civilized age that’s now been forgotten. The reason we have the pride movement incorporated into everything here is that the subject matter is unholy, abusive, disgusting, and spreads diseases. It’s a perverted sexual impulse, not an organic identity like your race or nationality. One can simply not participate in these activities, and shame provided a pretty big incentive to desist.

I also think that shame instills a sort of collective consciousness which influences people who lack self-awareness. I wasn’t around for the 1950s, but I’ve seen plenty of photographs. When shopping at my local Walmart, I can’t help but notice the weight and appalling standards of dress featured by many customers. My suspicion is that if they were plopped down in a retail situation back in those days, they’d see everybody else and feel ashamed of themselves. This would lead to an attempt to do better.

Shame is something that might have evolved into a more gentle enforcement mechanism than brutal punishments. In ancient times, they sure didn’t take kindly to a man interacting in certain ways with another man. It was dealt with severely. If they’d have seen men dressed as demons dancing in front of kids, one suspects burning at the stake would’ve been the remedy.

I’m certainly not advocating any of these methods for maintaining order. My point is that just as the truth shall set you free, shame can save you from transgressions you’ll regret later. Therefore, many problems have gentle solutions, like truth and shame, to guide our conduct in a sustainable society. I still think the collapse and cannibalism stage will come first, but the survivors could really have it better if they keep that in mind. Have a great day.

The post Shame: A Force For Good appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Originally published March 27, 2023, at Dissident Mama.

My guest is vice rector of Kiev Theological Academy in the Kiev Caves Lavra, Archimandrite Filaret Voloshyn, who I interviewed with co-host Father John Whiteford, a priest in the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, head priest at St. Jonah Orthodox Church in Spring, Texas, and a co-founder of the Ludwell Orthodox Fellowship along with yours truly.

Last week, Father Filaret released a video about the tensions rising in the ancient monastery and its theological schools in response to the Ukrainian government’s impending March 29 deadline to remove the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) from the monastery. The courageous hieromonk (whose English is superb!) explains to Father John and me the “tragically difficult” situation that is unfolding there (and has been for a many years) and is coming to a head within days. This is a matter of religious and human rights, and one that affects not only the Orthodox faithful of Kiev but also every Christian around the world. I implore all people of goodwill to listen to this first-person account and pray mightily for those being persecuted.

Download this podcast, watch on Odysee or YouTube, or listen at Dissident Mama.My friends at Orthodox Reflections, who suggested to me that I reach out to Fr. Filaret for an interview, have some of the best articles on the crisis being inflicted upon the UOC. These include:

• “5 Important Ways to Help the Persecuted Ukrainian Orthodox Church” which features the email message Fr. Filaret sent to alternative-media outlets in America.
• “8 Lies Told by Enemies of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church”
• “End the Unjust, Immoral Persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church”
• “We Demand an End to the Silence Over the Persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church”

Fr. John also presented a paper in 2019 at St. Tikhon University entitled “An American Perspective on the Ukraine Crisis” and was featured at OrthoChristian. Here are a few other relevant items from this Orthodox website:

• “New video shows how UOC completely restored the dilapidated Kiev Caves Lavra (+VIDEO)”
• “Thousands of faithful again fill the Kiev Caves Lavra on Sunday of the Cross (+VIDEO)”
• “‘Bow to me and you’ll have no problems,’ Pat. Bartholomew tells Met. Onuphry, according to Lavra abbot”
• “Metropolitan Onuphry’s Pastoral Love for the Ukrainian People”

Some of Fr. John’s other pertinent articles on this extremely vital topic:

• “What’s Going on in Ukraine? Part 1: The Historical Background”
• “What’s Going on in Ukraine? Part 2: The Canonical Issues”
• “The Day They Began Killing Christians”

And a couple of his homilies:

• “St. Maximus the Confessor and the Schism in Ukraine”
• “The Schism over Ukraine”

The post Archimandrite Filaret Voloshyn on the Dissident Mama Podcast appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Individualism and collectivism are often used as a false dichotomy. Individualists often state that you are either an individualist or a collectivist.

One such example of that dichotomy is this graphic that I often see scattered around:

Not only is the modern individualist argument a false binary, but it is also a false premise by not understanding of what an individual is. An individual is intrinsically part of their biological nation; whether or not they desire that is irrelevant. A man proclaiming himself as a fully independent, non-connected individual is no different from a man proclaiming he is a woman. It is imaginary and, in their mind, only.

We are all communitarian individuals. It is an inherent part of the human condition and our biology.

Both individualism and collectivism philosophies are dangerous. Collectivism, obviously so, because of its focus on the state (a political power or system, not the people). But so too is individualism, because of its degeneration.

The organic, unaltered form of individualism is not necessarily bad. Some of its original roots were laid as early as the Greco-Roman era (to a much lesser extent than of today, as they all still recognized communities).

Modern individualism, mostly since the Enlightenment, has gone completely wacky. They have shifted from the focus of individuals through their chosen local community to absolute individualism, as espoused by thinkers like Ayn Rand.

In effect, historic individualism changed from “me and my community” to modern individualism: “me, myself, and I.” They turn away from not only their nation, but even their community in the process.

This is something the Greeks and Romans could not have possibly fathomed. They were Roman first. They were Athenian, or Spartan. Read their works, you can feel their community identity bleed through the pages.

Marcus Aurelius, for instance, always put “Roman” before “man” in all of his writings. Including famously in this quote:

“Let it be thy earnest and incessant care as a Roman and a man to perform whatsoever it is that thou art about, with true and unfeigned gravity, natural affection, freedom and justice.”

Our ancestors claimed community and nation first, individual second. But both still mattered. It was not a false dichotomy between the two.

Who does this still today? Who claims their nation? Hardly any, if we are being truthful to ourselves. It’s all “me, me, and me.”

But even this mere thought is asinine, because everything we do, and use requires others. There are hardly any who are truly self-sufficient entirely on themselves, and even those that think they are still must use the security and stabilization of the state or other apparatus to not need to recruit their own army to protect their goods. That’s just one example; I am sure my reader can ponder plenty more.

Those same ancestors knew that when their people did well, they also did well. They relied on their nation, and in return their nation allowed them the liberties and individual options to prosper alongside them. Our heritage knew that it required more than one person to achieve such heights.

Their communitarian approach allowed a branching out of individualism, so long as its roots were in the community. People could be individuals because their nation was secure enough together.

To be alone is to be abandoned. The wild thing about modernity is that it convinces people to self-abandon and seclude themselves. That used to be implemented as a punishment. In fact, it was one of the worst punishments to be exiled from your community/nation. There are many famous cases of individuals punished with exile that instead chose to kill themselves, because of how severe it was perceived.

Now, because of degenerative individualism, being exiled is self-inflicted.

Which, in many ways, is exactly what the Enlightenment wanted. They wanted to distance themselves from the communitarianism (and the occasional error of collectivism) in Christendom. So, they did so by encouraging individualism, which provoked turning one’s back on their own nation.

This allowed other nations to operate more effectively, because they stayed united, versus others, which were segmented by each individual. This segmentation – being alone – leads to pathological cowardice, the final stage of degenerative individualism.

It also allowed the importation of excessive tolerance of every form of degeneracy and a firestorm of greed/corruption – because hey, it is good for me.

The modern ills we see surrounding us today stem from the excess of the individualist philosophy which took root during the Enlightenment period.

Individualism also often hides behind nice-sounding definitions, such as this one:

“Individualists promote the realisation of one’s goals and desires, valuing independence and self-reliance, and advocating that the interests of the individual should gain precedence over the state, while opposing external interference upon one’s own interests by society or institutions such as the government.”

Once again, it paints the picture that there are only two options: a state focus or an individual focus. This is wrong. There is also a nation focus, a community (enclave) focus, a social group focus, and plenty of others.

And many of those focuses intrinsically include an individual focus, just not as their primary (meaning not at the cost of the entire community).

We can have both a healthy community and historic individualism, but it requires putting checks and balances on the evil and degenerative actions of some of our individuals that would seek to exploit pure individualism. The state does not need to be the one limiting it, communities can. Or enclaves, or nations. The individualist incorrectly assumes that it must be an empire or a political system restricting these malicious actors (collectivism). But it is simply not true, historically or now.

While it is true that individualism and collectivism are the two most common forms today, this is not historically true. Communitarianism, with evolving historic individualism, used to be dominant during Christendom and the Greco-Roman eras. Modernity perverted this trend.

Perhaps the most important thing for libertarians, anarchists, liberals, and the like, to realize is that individualism was once a useful characteristic of true communitarianism. It was a piece of it; a piece of our heritage that allowed both individuals and communities to prosper.

But under modernity, just like everything else, it has degenerated. Individualism has morphed and become a self-centered, destructive monstrosity that is tearing us down while allowing the collectivists the time needed to build up.

If we are to defeat the evils of the modern world, we need each other. This is not an individual fight. We need a return to an enclave or nation focus. We need to revive the Remnant, and we need to fight for the Remnant, so it may fight for us.

Or, we will keep segmenting until there are only individuals left on our side, while the enemy’s side is filled with united collectivists all working toward the same goal.

It does not take a genius to figure out which side will win.

-By Kaisar

The post The Weaponization of Individualism appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Author’s Note: This is the third part in a multi-part series in which I critique the rise of paganism within certain Dissident Right circles, listing the major reasons why I think paganism is a dead end for the Right and that it will only end in disaster.

If I am being charitable, I think the origin of the “Pagan Right” sits within how the development of Western civilization has been traditionally taught. To simplify matters a bit, the classical societies of ancient Greece and Rome are typically viewed as the foundation of Western civilization, and from there on other elements, such as Christianity, were simply added to it. The “Pagan Right” takes hold of this perspective and runs with it. The pagan assertion is: if the West existed before Christianity, then Christianity and the West are separate; thus, the West’s existence is not dependent upon Christianity and the religion is, in fact, an alien accompaniment that must be rejected. This is certainly not a viewpoint I share; I reject not only its conclusion but also its premise. However, it is important to understand that the “Pagan Right” is not new and has its roots in the Enlightenment project. Its aims are to divorce the West from its historic religion, and to cast the Ancient world as the rational age and, conversely, the Medieval period, the world of Christian Europe, as an era of ignorance and superstition.

The fundamental error with this line of thinking is that is it incorrect about the origins of the West. This is where I break with both the traditional (i.e., Enlightenment) understanding of the origins of the West, as well as, the pagans who have embraced this idea. Although Greece and Rome must be considered (some) of the foundations of the West, they are not synonymous with the West. Rather, Greco-Roman societies formed a separate, albeit related, civilization – the Classical period. It is important to remember that while the Greeks and Romans were White, the idea of Whites sharing a civilization does not begin with them. Their civilizations were not “European,” but rather “Mediterranean.” Yes, it is true that the Mediterranean of the Roman Empire was far Whiter than it is today, including North Africa, the Levant, and Anatolia. Those regions would become non-White thanks to the Arab and Turkic conquests centuries later. But, it is simply incorrect to presume that the Romans had an ethnic or cultural affinity for Europeans (as a whole) or had any shared cultural values. After all, they hated and feared the barbarians. Therefore, we cannot consider the “West,” with its homeland as Europe, as originating exclusively from Greco-Roman civilizations.

Rather than having a single cultural origin, with the Greeks and Romans as its only base, the origins of the West should be understood as forming around the synthesis of three distinct cultural forces. The Classical period is one of these streams; however, the other two, Christianity and the Germanic tribes, play equally critical roles. As much as a three-legged stool cannot stand if one of its legs is knocked out, neither can the West. Each of these legs forms the West and, if one of them is removed, the West ceases to exist. Far from being a toxic foreign influence on Europeans, Christianity forged the bonds of Europe, allowing Europeans, from Norway to Spain, to share a fundamental cultural and spiritual affiliation. This does not mean that they viewed each other as the same nation, they were still well aware of the differences between a Celt and a Pole or a Spaniard and a Frenchman. The fact that Italians and Germans could (and still can) regard each other as “Westerners” would have shocked any Roman or Germanic tribesman. To the Roman, the Germani were a brutish people hellbent on destroying civilization. To the German, the Roman was a slaver. It is only Christianity that ensured Germans and Italians shared a common civilization, as both accepted Christianity.

Each of these cultural traditions, Greco-Roman, Christian, and Germanic, gave the West its identity. And, in no way can one love the West and hate one of these traditions. From the Greco-Romans came philosophy, Christianity provided neighborly and communal support, and the Germanic peoples (including the Anglo-Saxons) bestowed the understanding of freedom. This list is, of course, just scratching the surface of the gifts each tradition gave the West. Islamic civilization utilized a great deal of Greco-Roman culture, but it is not the West. Ethiopia is an ancient Christian kingdom, but it is also not the West. While no pagan Germanic nation survived, judging by what we have seen with Islam and Ethiopia, there is no reason for us to think such a nation would not be Western. Hilaire Belloc was right: “Europe is the faith and the faith is Europe.” The Christian faith made Europe and, in return, Europeans set out to spread the Gospel to every corner of the world. The real origins of the West do not reside in Plato’s Athens, but rather in Charlemagne’s Carolingian Empire. It was at this point where all three of the West’s major influences, the Classical world, Christianity, and Germanic culture, all cohesively came together.

Instead of viewing the Greco-Roman world as the sole birthplace of Western civilization, the Right should understand that it is only one part of our origin, albeit an incredibly important one. By hating, or simply downplaying one of these forces, the sons and daughters of the West are weakening a major part of their own civilization. The fact that the Left does this is one matter, they are only acting in their nature. Christianity is not a foreign interloper, but one of the three legs by which the West stands.

There is another matter on which Belloc is accurate: “Europe will return to the Faith, or she will perish.“

The post Against Paganism, Part 3: No West without Christianity appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

When my wife and I moved to the South in 2002, we ended up in a small, semirural town in North Louisiana. It was the kind of small town we wanted. Our intent was to avoid cities as much as possible. We had both grown up in small towns in the North and were not city people. The town we ended up in had one main street and about five side streets, and it had a distinct small town Southern atmosphere. There was a gas station, a couple of churches, a bank, market, a few restaurants, and a hardware store on the main street.

One of the restaurants was sort of a local hangout, the kind of place you could visit on a warm afternoon, buy a glass of sweet tea or Coke, and just sit and visit with some of the local folks. They also served a pretty good (and inexpensive) fried catfish dinner in the evening. My wife and I often stopped there for supper on Saturday evening. It was all ideal – for a while.

But then came the scions of “progress and change,” and nothing was ever the same again. They told us the town needed a bigger and better bridge across the river – and they were correct about that. The old bridge across the river that was there had been built in the early 1930s. It needed replacing. But the replacement we ended up with took out about a third of the town’s main street. The result was that one of the churches, the hardware store, and the two restaurants all had to go. And the local chemical company (a division of Dow Chemicals) bought from the town all the land that the church and restaurants and hardware store had previously occupied, and nothing was to be built on that land. The chemical company wanted all of it to remain open space. That pretty well killed the town’s main street as far as business went and it erased the unique Southern atmosphere the town had previously had.

The mayor at that time had some grandiose plans to put all the businesses out on the main highway – about five miles from where they had previously been. I’m not sure anyone ever figured out completely what he was trying to do, but he worked at it anyway – and the town completely lost its unique Southern character and became just one more shopping stop on the main highway. There were those in town that protested, but not enough of them.

My wife and I now no longer live in the town, in the house we lived in. Our health will not permit that any longer. When we still lived in that town, I ran for the town council one year, on a platform of less government and more personal responsibility. And though I didn’t win, I got a respectable number of votes for someone who had not lived their life there.

The mayor, with all the big plans, extended the town’s debt so much that the town almost ended up bankrupt. The mayor after him was a conservative and loyal American who had served in the Marines, but by the time he got elected, the town was so far in debt there was little he could do. I understand the current mayor is quite liberal, so we can kiss the unique Southern atmosphere of the town goodbye. It’s doubtful if it will ever return. It reminded me of the West Texas towns in some of Elmer Kelton’s novels about Texas. They were on the point of losing their unique Western identity because of what some “progressive” people wanted to do to and with them. Unfortunately, such situations are not unique to fiction. They exist in real life, and we have seen them acted out.

Right now, the South and its culture and identity are under constant attack. Southern monuments, symbols, and flags are almost everywhere denigrated where once they were honored and revered. If the South loses its identity, it will never get it back and it will end up being just another nonentity among the other nonentities in Wokedom. That seems to be where we are headed. I have talked with other Southern patriots who said they never thought they’d live to see what’s going on now, and I did not think I would, either, but I have – and it gives me no pleasure. I could weep for my adopted country!

All that has made her unique is being flushed down the sewer in a headlong rush to be like the rest of the country – something we should not want nor want to be partakers in. Both the South and the Far West have a unique heritage – something that should be preserved, not tossed aside. They are the only unique American cultures remaining and they must be preserved. We discard them to our own hurt and the hurt of our children!

-By Al Benson, Jr.

The post The Destruction of a Southern Town for Expediency and “Progress” appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

We don’t live in a democracy based on freedom and human rights in which policy decisions are reached through a process of collective consensus about what’s good for the average citizen. Such systems are easily captured by plutocracy because everyone is for sale. In other words, long ago our system became a sham to conceal what’s really going on.

This group is comprised of characters who hate the average citizen. Contrary to being history’s #1 blameless victims, they’re actually downright nefarious. By their fruits ye shall know them, and I’d call the child trannies proof enough. There are many other glaring items, like endless warfare and mass migration to dilute Heritage America because this is a demographic that eventually turns on them every single time.

Somehow, for reasons that are perhaps divine, they can’t grasp that this sham is fundamentally unsustainable. That could explain why as the darkness gathers, they’re jettisoning the media operation that instilled complacency. From the entertainment side, that’s already happened. You can’t watch a decent television show or sporting event without everything being rubbed in your face.

Since cable news started, they’ve been pretty successful at convincing people there are two sides, just like the political system. That’s nonsense. Everyone works for them in both, which is why the general direction never changes.

Trump thought he could deviate from a script he must not have realized was official, and thus enforced. What we got was a color revolution and elections that are now “fortified” with mail-in ballots. He could easily finish up his life in state prison.

This is why the media scam is so crucial. It’s possible to fool most people. The vaccine saga demonstrates that the average person is frighteningly credulous. However, there has to be some acknowledgement of reality for this to work on a certain segment. That would be known as the political Right.

By acknowledging some truth, there can be a false dichotomy in which controlled opposition figures keep the Right on track by denouncing certain things that it really dislikes. For example, child trannies must be denounced to keep the Right supporting this figure as someone tuned into reason and decency. Meanwhile, every other vector of influence will be working to turn their children into trannies. The opposition rhetoric changes nothing, but it keeps people invested in the system.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson characterized white advocacy as a form of "Nazism" during a podcast with Adam Carolla released on Monday.https://t.co/gw1AQmESGy

— Chris Menahan (@infolibnews) April 4, 2023

For example, look at how this scam turned out with race. For decades, we were told by controlled opposition that Affirmative Action is bad, and the Republican Party can do something about it. People on the Right gave their support for this reason and what they ended up with was getting stripped of the right to defend themselves from black people who’ve been unleashed in a crime wave on America.

In terms of immigration, these figures have kept everyone complacent as the population undergoes dramatic change. They acknowledge that not having a border is insane, which is true. This garners support from people who think that this will be a path to stopping demographic change, so they adopt the only opposition position allowed: that they want immigration to be legal. Meanwhile, we get more of both.

The most important task of controlled opposition figures is to make sure that Heritage America never takes its own side or catches on to the fact that the government can’t represent them because it’s controlled by the plutocracy. Those are the two golden rules that govern these scumbags as they make millions of dollars on their path to Hell.

Keeping the scam going is a very challenging magic show at this point, the equivalent of trying to hide an elephant with a sleight of hand. The evidence they need to keep the Right from noticing is that overwhelming. Tucker Carlson was the best scumbag they’ve ever had by far.

That’s probably due to his writers. When he’s off script he sounds pretty dumb. In the interview above he says that nobody can claim to represent White people when we’re a minority (like somebody does with every single other group on this planet), he sounds like an idiot.

I saw another where he said that people should have more kids than they can afford. Clearly, he doesn’t understand what that’s going to entail. This is a guy from a very privileged background who has no idea what percentage of a modest income it costs for someone just to keep a kid safe at this point.

I’ve been to Farmington Country Club, where his daughter was accosted by a gay lunatic. It’s pretty damn nice but a membership is less than putting a few kids through private school every year. He clearly doesn’t know what poor White kids experience at a public school in a district that their parents can afford. Without those writers, I doubt he’s got much going for him at all in terms of common-sense rhetoric.

Anyways, his Fox News operation was the best thing the plutocracy ever had going for it in terms of controlled opposition. Trying to rebuild an audience of that size with his replacement is going to be very difficult, even if they’re keeping everyone behind the scenes in place. Firing him without even allowing a farewell broadcast makes him look even more like a hero.

I think the whole episode is great for anyone trying to point out the truth because one of our biggest problems is scumbags offering a substitute. Unfortunately, by offering the masses something, you can keep them on track to losing everything. That’s how things got this bad.

The good news is that the plutocracy has become so hysterical and insane since Trump was elected that they can’t allow it. They hate us so much that they’ve become blind to the utility of making concessions.

This is some justice for the American people and for @FoxNews viewers who’ve been manipulated and lied to for years, all in an attempt to boost the channel’s ratings and revenue.

— Abby Grossberg (@abby_grossberg) April 24, 2023

There’s also an interesting angle to how this all came about. it seems that someone could’ve been slipped in there for a screw job. We certainly saw that with the Trump Administration. The ADL demanded he be fired, leading to a public feud in front of his entire audience which made them look terrible and didn’t work.

As we saw with Trump, they’ll find a way to get you gone. The more of a priority it is, the less of a constraint there will be on their behavior and concern about the blowback. Whether this theory about the screw job is true or not, it still makes them look awful. They are, so that’s a good thing.

ADL hails Fox News for long-sought ouster of Tucker Carlson https://t.co/DYeEOoNikM

— The Times of Israel (@TimesofIsrael) April 24, 2023

Like I said, it’s all good news. Just like with Trump, they’d have been much better off leaving him with his job. The last thing either one of them would ever do is go after these people. They did their very best to make sure that none of their supporters did, either. Freeing ourselves doesn’t just involve us advancing the truth, but them squandering what they’ve stolen.

White shitlibs are ecstatic about this development. They think the entire Fox News network should be shut down because they’re the bad guys. The truth is that they are, but not for the reason these creatures believe.

The post Tucker Carlson appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Originally published April 22, 2023, at Dissident Mama.

When my friend and fellow parishioner Thomas Millary asked me to be a guest on his up-and-coming podcast, Psyop Cinema, I happily agreed. But because it’s a “film industry” show, I also had to pick a movie to critique – something that should kind of encapsulate my work at Dissident Mama, he advised. I’m not much of a movie buff, so I was at a loss for choosing a film.

But then my husband suggested that I tackle “Gone With the Wind” – oh, a film that that just so happens to be the highest-grossing film in history and is based upon one of America’s most popular books, second only to the Bible. No biggie, right?! My hubs and Thomas thought it seemed to be the obvious choice, so I deferred to their judgement. However, I knew I had my work cut out for me.

This is how Thomas describes my appearance on his show notes page: “Thomas speaks with Rebecca Dillingham, host of The Dissident Mama Podcast and blog and co-founder of the Ludwell Orthodox Fellowship, about the lies of the Yankee Empire. Rebecca gives her take on the psyops perpetrated by globalists and neocons that have distorted American history and demonized the South. We cover many aspects of the problem of puritanical political utopianism before discussing the nuances of ‘Gone with the Wind.’”

I don’t want to give any spoilers as to whether I think the film is “crypto-progressive” or not. I’d rather you take a listen for yourself to this conversation that I can confidently say is a pretty darn riveting.

But because the cinematic choice – the most highly influential film ever and a long one to boot (run time is just shy of four hours) – was immense, I not only watched GWTW for the umpteenth time, but I researched. A lot. And so I thought I would share with you some of my findings and sources and a few intriguing details that didn’t make their way into my deep-dive with Thomas. Enjoy!

My correspondence with two Southern stalwarts who happen to be Americana movie aficionados:

Dr. Boyd Cathey wrote to me that although GWTW was great from a movie-making perspective, it’s also “just one giant, never-ending soap opera, with Scarlet’s travails seeming to overwhelm and overshadow the South and the War (and Reconstruction) which became like background scenery. Yes, there are moments when the issues confronting the South – war, defeat, reconstruction policies – come alive, but I find them overshadowed and, if you will, overwhelmed, by the relationship between Scarlet and Rhett.”

“Don’t get me wrong here: obviously, any great film should probably have a personal thematic strand, developing relationships between the stars. GWTW does have those relationships, but in developing them, the Southern framework is, for me, too often submerged.” But to say “it is the ‘great film about the War’ is for me a stretch.”

Dr. Clyde Wilson agreed with Cathey that the film “has elements of soap opera.” However, he added, “In the general surrounding history, I think it is accurate and useful truth-telling. On the whole it is has been good for our cause. Remember, both book and movie were international sensations and still are. Just last night I saw a movie about Norwegian resistance fighters in WWII and one of them mentioned having cried at the movie GWTW.”

I had this movie poster hanging in my bedroom throughout my middle-school and high-school years.My visit to Margaret Mitchell’s grave and “The Dump” where she wrote her famous novel:

“Lyin’ Atlanta, part 1” corroborates Dr. Wilson’s comment above and explains that “both the Nazis and the Soviets outlawed the book since it was seen as a story of resistance to central authoritarianism, survival, and hope.” This essay also includes some background on Mitchell’s ancestry and the burning of her beloved home, Atlanta.

More on Sherman’s catastrophic campaign across Georgia and Dixie becoming “the stomping grounds of petty imperialists” can be read in “Puritans, part 4: Yankee sanctification.” Not only a stupendous novelist, but Mitchell was also a stellar amateur historian and said it best (and these lines from the book were included as title cards in the movie):

When Yankees began to descend upon Atlanta, “panic hit the city, helpless and unarmed … For 35 days, a battered Atlanta hung grimly on. … To split the Confederacy and to leave it forever crippled and humbled, the great invader marched leaving behind a path of destruction 60 miles wide from Atlanta to the sea … Tara had survived to face the hell of famine and defeat.”

My Puritans essay also happens to include this golden rhetorical nugget from Mitchell, who was very much a lady but never one to keep her opinions to herself: “[Yankees] are pretty much like Southerners – except with worse manners, of course, and terrible accents.” My guess is that Mitchell was also “high spirited and vivacious,” just the way Mellie described Scarlett.

A few lines that jumped out as me seeming to push tradition as untenable:

Rhett: “Look at these poor tragic people, the South’s sinking to its knees to never rise again … the cause of living in the past is dying right in front of us … sheer waste.”

Ashley: “The end of our world’s coming.”

Rhett: “Take a good look, my dear, a historic moment, you can tell your grandchildren how you watched the Old South disappear … we were going to lick the Yankees in a month … poor gallant fools.”

Rhett: “Maybe I’ve always had a weakness for lost causes once they’re really lost.”

Ashley: “Civilization’s crumbling … now I find myself in a world which for me is worse than death, a world in which there’s no place for me” … but I must stay for “honor.”

And of course the movie’s lead title card from where the book’s name originates: “Cavaliers and cotton fields … gallantry took its last bow … knights and ladies faire … master and slave … only in books … a dream remembered … a civilization gone with the wind.”

My myriad of sources:

First, of course, the movie itself, which is free on Archive.org and thankfully does not begin with this reconstructed “trigger warning” that accompanies other updated versions of the film. I, like so most others, have seen GWTW many times, so much so, that it has clearly become part of the fabric of America, the Southerner, and even womanhood, its phrases part of our lexicon, and its characters like family. But this time around, I watched the film much less passively and with a much keener eye. Just what is the story its selling?

Thomas was subjected to this title card which has been added to the beginning of many contextualized (read: reconstructed) versions of the famous flick.And the following articles and books helped guide me in my research and in formulating my opinions on GWTW.

• “Identity Politics and the Southern Gentleman”
• “Southern Identity in ‘Gone With the Wind’”
• “Star Wars and ‘Gone With the Wind’”
• “Hollywood and the South”
• “Adventures in Southern and Confederate Cinema”
• “The Literature Police and ‘Gone With the Wind’”
• “Southern Speech”
• “Kith and Kin: The Enduring Ethic of the South”
• “Mel Bradford and the Defense of Southern Conservatism”
• “Why the War Was Not About Slavery”
• “The Unemancipated Country: Eugene Genovese’s Discovery of the Old South”
• “The Lost Cause Considered Once More”
• “How Southerners Committed Cultural and Political Suicide”
• “Classic Confederate Hollywood”
• “Punished With Poverty: The Suffering South – Prosperity to Poverty & the Continuing Struggle”
• “When the Yankees Come” Former South Carolina Slaves Remember Sherman’s March From the Sea”
• “A Legion of Devils: Sherman in South Carolina”

Don’t forget to check out my chat with Psyop Cinema, featuring both Thomas and co-host Bret Carolla. In fact, the episode with these two Carolina gents marked the 3-year anniversary of the launch of the Dissident Mama Podcast. So, here’s to three more years of taking on big topics and interviewing (or being interviewed by) people with such big brains, no matter the haters! Like Scarlett so aptly states, “As God is my witness, they’re not going to lick me.”

The post Oh, Just a Little Critique of the Biggest Film Ever! appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I was flipping around television on what I’d forgotten was the 30-year anniversary of the massacre in Waco, Texas. It brought back a lot of memories. I was born during the Reagan Administration. While we had some serious racial issues in my hometown, it still felt like things were on the up in America. After all, we’d recently triumphed in the Cold War.

I’d do this routine when my mother demanded I put a shirt on for supper.Most of the children born during this time had grandfathers who served in World War 2. Many of them had very humble backgrounds, but used opportunities offered by the GI Bill and the post-war economic growth to really succeed and provide good lives for their families. It felt like this actually was a place where one could make the most of himself.

The coolest thing I’d ever seen on television was us blasting apart Iraq with precision bombs a couple years prior. I think a lot of political dissidents had the same experience: Waco really shocked me because now Americans were getting the Iraq treatment.

My recollection was basically that there were a bunch of White people in the Middle of Nowhere, Texas not bothering anybody and then the government launched a military assault on them. This culminated in their building getting rammed with a tank and pumped full of gas in order to burn them all alive because the FBI lost patience with their refusal to surrender after harassing them day and night with noise for months. The creature orchestrating this outrage was Janet Reno, a bizarre lesbian type who looked like my PE teacher.

The justification essentially was that they had something to do with guns. Everybody I knew had guns. My favorite thing to wear to school was an NRA trucker cap. It was deeply disturbing hint that things were seriously amiss in the “Land of the Free.” In retrospect, there was a bit more going on.

Years after that, I remember we went over the massacre as a sort of case study. This colonel explained to us how David Koresh claimed to be the messiah, he’d go into tirades for hours while playing guitar and also have intercourse with everybody’s wives. His disciples were prohibited from performing this procedure themselves. Also, pedophilia stuff.

So, yeah, he wasn’t a great guy, and the authorities should have dealt with him. However, they could have done that by nabbing him when he wasn’t at his heavily armed doomsday compound and probably nobody would’ve been killed. The thing is, if there wasn’t a political mandate, no federal agency might’ve been looking into them in the first place.

Back in the Clinton Administration, they were already on a literal war path against White people who didn’t like the government. They were set up by informants and undercover agents on firearms charges, and dealt with using extreme force for things that weren’t even a big deal. The murder of Randy Weaver’s wife and son is absolutely infuriating. He was simply a guy who wanted to live in the Middle of Nowhere so he could be an unobstructed White man and his family could be left alone. Without an undercover agent to go all the way out there and solicit a transaction, they could still be doing just that.

This operation was called PATCON (Patriot Conspiracy). All the way back then, we were already living in a country that decided if you were a patriot, you were a problem. As outrageous as we find these more recent incidents like January 6th or the absurd Gretchen Witmer kidnapping plot, there’s a very strong precedent for this sort of treachery. Every single one (there are many) would appall anyone with a moral compass.

I’ve never once come across a single one of these “patriot conspiracies” that wasn’t orchestrated by federal law enforcement. They nearly always involve firearms transactions as well, because then they have the victim dead to rights on felonies that have nothing to do with the plot itself, which their lawyers would be able to point out was entirely cooked-up by the Feds. The result is that the Feds are able to get the headlines that the victim pled guilty after being charged with the plot. Every single time, without an informant or undercover agent (often multiples of both involved), there would’ve been no transaction.

I recently came across a story that emerged about 20 years later: “Within hours” after the Waco massacre, the Feds were headed to do another one in Tennessee. The problem was that they were worried about the bad press, and while they’d infiltrated this group and scouted the location with a Delta Force operative for an attack, these people hadn’t done anything wrong and couldn’t be entrapped into doing anything, either.

They’d been selected for destruction because they were White people with guns and bunkers in the Middle of Nowhere who wanted to be left alone. That was their transgression. So, why?

Most of these federal law enforcement types are just hired thugs who’ll brutalize whoever they’re told and congratulate themselves for serving their country. Most people also understand that when you leave others alone, you tend not to get problems out of them. Obviously, there’s no genuine national security priority behind this, either. The reason this continues to go on is the psychological animus of a small, specific group.

Everywhere and always, this group is able to set up shop by coopting the elite. The problem they consistently encounter is that after they’ve swindled, exploited, and abused the peasantry enough, the masses either force the elite to take action (this also makes a good excuse not to pay back loans) or take matters into their own hands. That’s the part that really frightens them.

It’s important to understand that they act out of long-held spiritual and historical hatreds. Just because nobody is going to do anything to them here, that doesn’t mean they don’t loath us and have a fear of us underlying their actions. We don’t think or feel this way, so it’s a counterintuitive principle to most.

These spasms are often exaggerated or outright fabricated. Still, the settling of accounts, shall we say, can be rather brutal. There’s a fear of that driving all of this, which can’t be articulated in honest terms just like every other aspect of their psychology and instruments of influence. They’re terrified of an armed and disgruntled Christian peasant because, throughout history, such characters have frequently been the instrument of God’s wrath against them. That’s why when we just want to be left alone, these people can’t do it.

Many, many such cases. The post Why They Hate Middle of Nowhere America appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

At a used book sale back in the 90s, I came across Sexpionage: The Exploitation of Sex by Soviet Intelligence by David Lewis. That’s quite an interesting title, so I picked this hardcover edition for a dollar. An interesting read, I recommend it.

During the Cold War, the KGB would select girls in high school, who had no idea what was going on, and train them (the details are rather lurid, as one might imagine) in sensual tactics and spy craft. They’d seduce foreign leaders and officials, luring them to encounters in rooms that were rigged with recording equipment. The results would be used for blackmail. If one of them decided to defect, she’d be headed home in a suitcase.

It’s still on my shelf, but I’d forgotten about it until the media said that Trump was being blackmailed by Putin with Kompromat as part of the operation to steal the 2016 election. As it turns out, China was running some sort of operation on the Democrats. Projection has amazing explanatory value in official American discourse.

WATCH@mtgreenee calls out @ericswalwell for having a 'sexual relationship with a Chinese spy'

GREENE: "That was quite entertaining from someone that had a sexual relationship with a Chinese spy. And everyone knows it!"

The Committee refused to strike her words from the… pic.twitter.com/y92z0okBwA

— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) April 19, 2023

She’s the best we could hope for, really. The issues plaguing our country are so existential and insane that you couldn’t possibly get me to care about Chinese spying. I’m perturbed because this narrative about how the CCP controls Biden and all this other nonsense riles up the MAGA types who think there’s something left to save.

I’m not trying to bash these guys. Their hard work, hope, and credulity kept America running all these decades to get us right here, to the edge of the grave. Perhaps it’s just that I’ve never had a problem conceding that we’re totally screwed. Your sentiments aren’t relevant to whether something real is happening or not. I feel a compulsion to follow the facts.

Honestly, when I saw the line up of who this Fang Fang woman had to pleasure, I felt sympathy and a twinge of admiration for her patriotism. This was an agent devoted to China and willing to sacrifice herself to obtain whatever she was after. I wonder if those spy chiefs back in Beijing appreciated what she had to put herself through to get that dossier they’re reading.

.@GOPLeader Kevin McCarthy on China planting a spy in Congress: @RepSwalwell should be "removed from Congress" [via @IngrahamAngle] pic.twitter.com/2m9c5tojcJ

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 9, 2020

As for whatever she was after, someone on the House Intelligence Committee could offer juicy tidbits about whatever neocon lunacy was going on at that moment. So, again, who cares? It’s very annoying that there’s a concerted media effort to get these MAGA people steered away from real grievances and towards griping about “the Biden crime family, controlled by the CCP.”

Just to name one, we’ve got the human equivalent of an asteroid belt floating around. It’s devoid of any agency whatsoever. Nothing can survive proximity to it, not even Walmart. It was the gold standard for an enduring institution in this terminally ill country. Eight of them are closing in Chicago because they steal so much the stores have been losing money the whole time.

Eastern Europeans and Asians I meet on business trips simply don’t have a comprehension of just how much damage a single one can inflict but asteroids have ended whole epochs. It’s difficult for them to fully appreciate just how many problems we have thanks to this belt of meddlesome minerals.

Many of the Europeans I’ve heard decry the gun violence in America seem to think it’s coming from mass shooters without understanding that four victims meet the statistical qualification, and these people will shoot into crowds without any hesitation. They even rap about this proclivity. Naïve foreigners think that number gets padded by rednecks trading gunfire with each other from their trailers.

And I present to you now, the parents of those rambunctious rapscallions we saw downtown last night.

Harlem/Jackson at the Chicago/Oak Park border

pic.twitter.com/jpYjsHZ71m

— 16th & 17th District Chicago Police Scanner (@CPD1617Scanner) April 16, 2023

I think drifting rocks is an appropriate analogy because they simply lack the impulse control and orientation towards the future that would help them appreciate the consequences of their course of action. It’s simply taken immediately without any mental deliberation. This has been proven repeatedly in testing, and the results of this combination are experienced by the general population every day. Has anyone ever restrained a floating rock? No, and the cops don’t bother to try anymore.

There’s also a large belt of teens floating between Mars and Jupiter.One of the things that lets you know there’s not much going on upstairs during these incidents would be the verbal discourse. An obscenity, usually the same two (“ho” or “bitch“), sometimes with modifiers attached, is shouted repeatedly as the fray transpires. Others will be filming, shouting some vernacular pronunciation of the word “shit” often with an exited “Oh!” or “Oooo!” in front of it. While our Christian publication refrains from profanity, these terms are repeated here purely for scientific purposes.

Somedays, I observe these collisions taking place and conclude to myself that the scenario described above will be how this country finally dies. I’m not a man of profound spiritual intuition, but I must admit to feeling a sense of disquiet on that level. What if they don’t get fed? That’s what you should be asking yourself.

The post Fang Fang, Bang Bang appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Author’s Note: This is the second part in a multi-part series in which I critique the rise of paganism within certain Dissident Right circles, listing the major reasons why I think paganism is a dead end for the Right and that it will only end in disaster.

The single most popular argument for the Dissident Right to embrace paganism is not so much a justification for modern paganism but rather a dissension against Christianity. Specifically, it is an anti-Christian message, and one that paints Christianity as a Jewish scheme to ensure the White race embraces suicidal values; thus, making White people easier to be controlled and marginalized by the Jews. The particulars regarding this argument differ from individual to individual, with some being more conspiratorial than others, but that is the general gist of their position. Unfortunately, this is perhaps the most common explanation and reasoning for a rightwing “pagan revival.” It is, however, also one of the weakest, failing on two major fronts.

The first and most obvious way in which this argument fails is very clear: if Christianity was some kind of Jewish plot to weaken European peoples, then it would stand to reason that Jews would vigorously promote Christianity and Christian values. But that is not at all what is occurring, while Christians oppose evils such as infanticide, sodomy, and transgenderism, Jews tend to embrace all three with great gusto. And it is not just the hot button social issues where we observe this deep division between Christians and Jews, but also on matters such as the place of religion within society. Jewish comedians, from Lenny Bruce to Sarah Silverman, frequently mock(ed) Our Lord and in the most perverse ways possible. Jews have constantly been a major secularizing force in society. The “secularizing activists,” of Catholic Cardinal Charles Chaput’s parlance, are disproportionally Jews. Not all are Jews, of course. It would be silly and self-defeating for us to act as if gentiles are completely innocent and every single Jewish person is guilty of this behavior. I frequently clash with those within the Dissident Right that believe every last Jew on earth is an evil, irredeemable person. Nonetheless, the leftwing shift in American society, especially since the end of World War II, has been largely driven by Jews (they will readily admit such).

This is not a new problem. The Talmud contains multiple blasphemes against Our Lord. According to the Talmud, Christ is boiling in excrement. The Talmud contains vitriol against the Virgin Mary, too, as she is depicted as a whore. None of this can, as the Left and (fake) Right often do, be attributed merely to a backlash against Christian persecution. The hatred of Christianity goes back to the very beginnings of Christianity. The Book of Acts makes it clear the Jews were the first to persecute the early Church. Meanwhile, Saint Paul noted what was happening in 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16:

For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea, in Christ Jesus: for you also have suffered the same things from your own coutrymen, even as they have from the Jews, Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men; Prohibiting us to speak to the Gentiles, that they may be saved, to fill up their sins always: for the wrath of God is come upon them to the end.

This section makes it clear that: (1) the Jews persecuted Christians, and (2) have taken an active position in prohibiting the Gospel from being spread. For us to imagine that Christianity is a Jewish plot, we have to imagine a multi-century game of reverse psychology whereby the Jews only pretended to hate Christianity in order to trick White people. Occam’s razor suggests this is implausible.

And this argument fails in its outcome, as well. Christianity did not weaken the White race; far from it, Christianity has historically been a source of great strength. The origins of this anti-Christian argument can be found within Enlightenment period thinking, in particular The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon, who describes Christianity as the force that sapped the life from Rome’s civic virtue. However, Gibbon was dead wrong. Rome fell for a multitude of reasons, and while the decline of civic virtue was a factor, it was far from the only one. Furthermore, Christianity was not the culprit, as Rome’s civic virtue started eroding long before Constantine legalized the religion. Additionally, the empires of Christian Europe far exceeded the empires of pagan Europe. Pagan Rome may have ruled the Mediterranean, but Christian Spain ruled an empire from California to the tip of South America. Pagan Greece ruled an empire that stretched to the Indus, but Christian Britain could boast that the sun was aways shinning on its empire.

If Jews really did create Christianity to weaken the White race, then they failed miserably. As much as I admire the Greco-Roman legacy, I must admit that the heights of Christian Europe were far greater than pagan Europe. Plus, White nations have gone through a rapid degree of secularization since 1945, and even more so since the 1960s, an era that has been marked by swift White decline. If Christianity was some kind of Jewish parasite on the White race, then we should expect to see an improvement in White nations as Christianity declines. In fact, we have observed the reverse: as Christianity declines, White nations decline with it.

No evidence, be it from the modern day or from antiquity, suggests that Christianity is a Jewish subversion of White ethnic identity. Jews have long been antagonistic towards Christianity, as seen in both the New Testament, the Talmud, and the actions of Jewish leadership today. Meanwhile, Christian Europe achieved far greater power than pagan Europe ever did. Also, the decline of Christianity has gone hand in glove with the decline of the West. I strongly reject the notion of only considering religion in terms of its utility, I am a Christian because I believe it to be true. But even if we take the utilitarian assumptions of the neo-pagan movement, paganism still fails to deliver.

The post Against Paganism, Part 2: Christianity is not a Jewish Plot appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Author’s Note: This is the first part in a multi-part series in which I critique the rise of paganism within certain Dissident Right circles, listing the major reasons why I think paganism is a dead end for the Right and that it will only end in disaster.

The first and most primary reason why I am not a pagan is simple enough – I am a Christian. I believe there is one God in three persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. I believe that God the Son came to earth in the form of a man named Jesus Christ, who is both fully divine and fully human. I believe that Christ was born of the Virgin Mary and came to earth to save sinners, whom I am one. I believe that He lived a sinless life but was unjustly executed, dying a cruel death on the Cross. However, on the third day, He rose again from the dead and ascended into Heaven and is now seated at the right hand of God the Father.

I do not believe in the old gods of paganism. I do not believe that Jupiter, Thor, Morrigan, or any other pagan deity exists now or in the past, at least not in the same way they were assumed to have existed by the ancient pagans. They may very well have been a complete figment of their imaginations, similar to the Easter Bunny, but they also may have been demonic entities misunderstood to be “gods.” Additionally, I do not think Valhalla is an actual place; heaven or hell is the ultimate destination of mankind.

That is, in a nutshell, the single biggest reason I am not a pagan. I believe in the teachings of Christianity and do not think the old pagan gods existed, and certainly not as deities worthy of worship. Notwithstanding the spiritual issues with pagan worship, there is a political component, too. The political problem with paganism, and why it leads to a dead end for the Right, is that the vast majority of self-described modern “pagans” do not believe Odin exists, either. They may claim to be the “Soldiers of Odin” (or some other nonsense), but when challenged, they will fall back and claim that they do not actually believe in Odin. Instead, modern pagans view Odin as some sort of role model, looking up to him in the same way a young boy admires Bruce Wayne and Superman.

That is one of the biggest flaws of modern paganism, and why embracing it is suicidal for the Right. It is a fringe movement for edgy atheists and, more importantly, it cannot inspire the kind of fanaticism that is needed to save the West. The truly devout will always have a great advantage over the wishy-washy, and that devotion can topple empires. A great example were the wildly successful Arab Invasions of the 7th and 8th centuries. By any measure, this should not have happened. The Arabs were few in number and had no history of organizing into a polity, and they were going up against the great empires of late antiquity – Rome and Persia. But conquer they did, completely vanquishing Persia and driving Rome into its core territory of Anatolia. There are many reasons why the Arabs were so successful: they were skilled horsemen, well adapted to desert fighting, Arab migration into Persian and Roman territories helped, and, finally, the Romans and Persians were exhausted after centuries of fighting.

However, one aspect of Arab victory cannot be overlooked – to them, they were literally on a mission from God. This gave them the fighting spirit needed to forge their empire, and also made it much more difficult for the Roman strategy of late antiquity to work (namely, bribery and espionage). The importance of religion can be observed in how Arab culture was able to thrive post-conquest. What the Arabs did was not completely unprecedented, barbarian tribes have been able to overrun decadent agricultural societies before (see the Mongols). In the vast majority of cases, the barbarians eventually merge with the customs of the conquered culture/society. At most, a synthesis occurs, such as in the case of the Germanic-Classical mixture in the former Western Roman Empire. With the Arabs, they were able to supplant the old culture. They certainly were not going to change their religion, but language could also not be changed. Arabic is the literal language of God – it is mainstream Islamic belief that the Koran always existed, and hence why the vast majority of Islamic scholars are against translating it. And when they conquered, they conquered territories full of people weak in their faith. Much of the old Roman territory the Arabs conquered, and later Islamized, were strongholds of Arianism, and these people were resentful of being ruled by a Trinitarian government. They could not offer the resistance that the devout had, and this was fatal to the Roman war effort.

The point of this is not to defend Islam or suggest the Dissident Right should embrace Islam as its religion – they cannot happen under any circumstances. Rather, it is to demonstrate what the devout can achieve. Devout and fanatical Arab nomads brought down two of the greatest empires and ended the world of antiquity, forming a brand-new civilization in its wake. Only a people absolutely sure of their mission can attain such a task.

This is why paganism is such a bad idea for the Right – it is not the realm of the true believers, the spiritually dedicated. It is full of edgy atheists and, as such, does not have the devotion needed to complete the task at hand. And while there may be some within the Dissident Right that view Christianity in terms of pure social utility, this is by no means as common within paganism. “Paganism,” as it exists today, does not have the devotion needed to save the West.

The post Against Paganism, Part 1: I Don’t Believe in the Old Gods (And Neither Do You) appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The idea that “a State should be run like a business” should pain the soul of a Southerner like a sharp thorn in a soft foot. A people and their government have their origin in the will and act of a Holy God. Thus, both have Him as their goal and as the model of their conduct. To reduce the functioning of a State government, which is an inseparable part of the mysterious spiritual-physical body of the ethnos, to the operative principles of a mundane business, then, is grotesque and repulsive.

The bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church spelled out some of the foundational truths of nations and governments in a document they wrote as the 21st dawned titled The Basis of the Social Concept.

About nations, they provide the following:

“In addition to their sharing one religion, the unity of the people of God was secured by their ethnic and linguistic community and their rootedness in a particular land, their fatherland (II.1).

…

The universal nature of the Church, however, does not mean that Christians should have no right to national identity and national self-expressions. On the contrary, the Church unites in herself the universal with the national. Thus, the Orthodox Church, though universal, consists of many Autocephalous National Churches.

…

The cultural distinctions of particular nations are expressed in the liturgical and other church art, especially in the peculiarities of Christian order of life. All this creates national Christian cultures.

Among saints venerated by the Orthodox Church, many became famous for the love of their earthly homeland and faithfulness to it. Russian hagiographic sources praise the holy Prince Michael of Tver who gave his life for his fatherland, comparing his feat to the martyrdom of the holy protomartyr Dimitrius of Thessaloniki: The good lover of his fatherland said about his native city of Thessaloniki, ‘O Lord, if you ruin this city, I will perish together with it, but if you save it, I will also be saved’.

In all times the Church has called upon her children to love their homeland on earth and not to spare their lives to protect it if it was threatened. The Russian Church on many occasions gave her blessing to the people for them to take part in liberation wars. Thus, in 1380, the venerable Sergius the abbot and miracle-maker of Radonezh blessed the Russian troops headed by the holy Prince Dimitry Donskoy before their battle with the Tartar-Mongol invaders. In 1612, St. Hermogen, Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, gave blessing upon the irregulars in their struggle with the Polish invaders. In 1813, during the war with the French aggressors, St. Philaret of Moscow said to his flock: If you avoid dying for the honour and freedom of the Fatherland, you will die a criminal or a slave; die for the faith and the Fatherland and you will be granted life and a crown in heaven.

The holy righteous John of Kronstadt wrote this about love of one’s earthly homeland: Love the earthly homeland… it has raised, distinguished, honoured and equipped you with everything; but have special love for the heavenly homeland… that homeland is incomparably more precious that this one, because it is holy, righteous and incorruptible. The priceless blood of the Son of God has earned that homeland for you. But in order to be members of that homeland, you should respect and love its laws, just as you are obliged to respect and really respect the laws of the earthly homeland.” (II.2).

In another section, they expound the nature of the state/government (bolding not added):

“God blesses the state as an essential element of life in the world distorted by sin, in which both the individual and society need to be protected from the dangerous manifestations of sin. At the same time, the need for the state aroused not because God willed it for the primitive Adam, but because of the fall and because the actions to restrict the dominion of sin over the world conformed to His will. Holy Scriptures calls upon powers that be to use the power of state for restricting evil and supporting good, in which it sees the moral meaning of the existence of state (Rom. 13:3-4) (III.2).

…

The Orthodox tradition has developed an explicit ideal of church-state relations… Attempts to work out this form were undertaken in Byzantium, where the principles of church-state relations were expressed in the canons and the laws of the empire and were reflected in patristic writings. In their totality these principles were described as symphony between church and state. It is essentially co-operation, mutual support and mutual responsibility without one’s side intruding into the exclusive domain of the other. The bishop obeys the government as a subject, not his episcopal power comes from a government official. Similarly, a government official obeys his bishop as a member of the Church, who seeks salvation in it, not because his power comes from the power of the bishop. The state in such symphonic relationships with the Church seeks her spiritual support, prayer for itself and blessing upon its work to achieve the goal of its citizens’ welfare, while the Church enjoys support from the state in creating conditions favourable for preaching and for the spiritual care of her children who are at the same time citizens of the state.

St. Justinian in his Sixth Novella formulates the principle lying in the basis of church-state symphony: The greatest blessings granted to human beings by God’s ultimate grace are priesthood and kingdom, the former (priesthood, church authority) taking care of divine affairs, while the latter (kingdom, government) guiding and taking care of human affairs, and both, come from the same source, embellishing human life. Therefore, nothing lies so heavy on the hearts of kings as the honour of priests, who on their part serve them, praying continuously for them to God. And if the priesthood is well ordered in everything and is pleasing to God, then there will be full harmony between them in every thing that serves the good and benefit of the human race. Therefore, we exert the greatest possible effort to guard the true dogmas of God and the honour of the priesthood, hoping to receive through it great blessings from God and to hold fast to the ones which we have. Guided by this norm, Emperor Justinian in his Novellas recognised the canons as having the power of state laws.

The classical Byzantine formula of relationships between state and church power is contained in the Epanagoge (later 9th century): The temporal power and the priesthood relate to each other as body and soul; they are necessary for state order just as body and soul are necessary in a living man. It is in their linkage and harmony that the well-being of a state lies.” (III.4).

In modern “American” politics, however, we get none of this beneficial understanding of human nature, history, etc. We get society reduced to a set of business propositions. Mr. Ned White is a candidate for Louisiana’s State Senate, and his statements on government are typical of the contemporary mindset:

“In short, Louisiana must be run like a business and the best way to ensure this goal is for people who run businesses, make payrolls, spend long hours building opportunities for all of people to be engage and involved in changing our state government.

…

I want Louisiana to run like a business for the customers of Louisiana (the taxpayers) and every tax dollar accounted for and every penny spent properly.

I’m a businessperson. I spend every day making business decisions to meet my overhead, build new business, create new opportunities, and give my customers what they want, when they want it, and how they want it. I want state government to work the same way.”

Folks, this is Yankee nominalism in full bloom here in our Southland – another Yankee conquest over true Southern culture, which is opposed to this kind of materialistic reductionism that makes men and women created in the image of God into nothing more than taxpayers and the Christian ethnos a money-making enterprise.

It is true that the South lived through an infidel era of her own from the late 18th to the early 19th century, but it was an aberration. From the established churches of the colonial and early post-independence years to more recent decades in which Southern State legislatures have passed laws to bring Bible instruction and public prayer back into public schools and to outlaw same-sex marriage and other perversions – Christianity has been a dominant force in Southern life for most of her existence.

This is reflected in her thoughts about government, too. Rev. Dabney in his formidable Defence of Virginia puts those thoughts into words:

“We trace civil government, then, not to any social contract, or other human expediency, but to the will and providence of God, and to original moral obligation. If asked, whence the obligation to obey the civil magistrate who, personally, is but our fellow, we answer, from God’s will, which is the source and measure of duty. Man’s will is wayward and depraved. Hence practical authority to enforce this rule of right upon him must be lodged in some hands; and since God does not rule statedly by miracle, it must be in human hands. Civil government is God’s ordinance, and its obligations are those of original moral right. The advantage and convenience resulting illustrate and confirm, but do not originate, the obligation. This is the theory of government plainly taught by St. Paul (Rom. xiii. 1 to 7) and St. Peter (1 Ep. ii. 13 to 18). For we are here told that the civil magistrate is God’s minister, to uphold right and repress wrong; that obedience to him in this is not only of moral, but religious obligation; and that he who resists this function disobeys God” (pgs. 251-2).

For Dixie, as for any other Christian land, government is not a business. It is an authority ordained by God, and must be approached and “run” as something sacred. Edmund Burke, despite some of his inclinations towards liberalism, is still capable of a moving and fairly accurate description of government and society that is very much in keeping with the Southern disposition (via Reflections on the Revolution in France):

“In this choice of inheritance we have given to our frame of polity the image of a relation in blood, binding up the constitution of our country with our dearest domestic ties, adopting our fundamental laws into the bosom of our family affections, keeping inseparable and cherishing with the warmth of all their combined and mutually reflected charities our state, our hearths, our sepulchres, and our altars.

Society is indeed a contract. Subordinate contracts for objects of mere occasional interest may be dissolved at pleasure — but the state ought not to be considered as nothing better than a partnership agreement in a trade of pepper and coffee, calico or tobacco, or some other such low concern, to be taken up for a little temporary interest, and to be dissolved by the fancy of the parties. It is to be looked on with other reverence; because it is not a partnership in things subservient only to the gross animal existence of a temporary and perishable nature. It is a partnership in all science; a partnership in all art; a partnership in every virtue, and in all perfection. As the ends of such a partnership cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born. Each contract of each particular state is but a clause in the great primaeval contract of eternal society, linking the lower with the higher natures, connecting the visible and the invisible world, according to a fixed compact sanctioned by the inviolable oath which holds all physical and all moral natures, each in their appointed place.”

The atheistic, utilitarian business model of human relations is unsound and un-Southern. It should be decisively banished from Dixie and replaced with her original Christian view of them, casting out all the Ned White’s and putting in their places every Prince Michael, Prince Dimitry, and King Alfred that we possibly can.

-By Walt Garlington

The post A State is not a Business appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

I’ve never planned a war before, but if given the task, there are basic metrics I’d expect. For example, artillery. How much of each piece is available? How many shells might each of these fire on average per day? Let’s take the highest estimate to be safe, then compare that to existing stocks and how much we can produce and supply to the front lines per month. That’s some simple math to do before the shooting you’re planning to provoke starts.

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff had to testify before Congress that “we’re learning” how many shells are required to fight a massive land war against Russia on its border. Nobody will get that job without going right along with the idiocy, so it makes sense from that angle, although it really is astounding.

I’d like to think I’d also have the integrity to resign and speak out if I was ordered undertake this endeavor due to its recklessness, horrific human cost, and guaranteed prospects of failure. I’d keep my conscience, my six-figure pension, and help my country avert catastrophe.

America has made colossal mistakes based on bad information in the past. For example, intervening in a Vietnamese civil war because we concluded that this was a battle ground in the USSR’s quest for global communism, and if it fell, more would be next. Unlike taking out every single country unfriendly to Israel, “Domino Theory” had a saleable logic to it.

Although misguided, the war was a winnable proposition, and we could produce what was needed to fight it. We lost because global public opinion wouldn’t tolerate the massive amount of civilians who’d be killed if we ramped up the bombing enough to bring the North to its knees. It wasn’t always failure, though.

NATO was actually a good idea. It set up an alliance to defend Western Europe from the USSR, thus deterring a conflict. George F. Kennan, one of the primary architects of the policy to contain the Soviets, was horrified that it was being expanded towards Russia and warned they’d eventually take action.

Kennan also opposed the bombing of Serbia and the laughable justification for invading Iraq, but by that time he was an old man on the sidelines. Nobody with a Scots-Irish background was making policy. Instead, full control had been captured by a group of people without reason or restraint. Things are now run by the neocons who attend religious services on Saturdays. They have a religious imperative to seek total domination of the planet.

Yellen admits that weaponizing the dollar can result in the destruction of the dollar as adversaries seek alternatives. I explained this dynamic to the Pentagon and Treasury ten years ago. The slow kids in the class are finally catching up.https://t.co/AzWQpTos5P

— Jim Rickards (@JamesGRickards) April 17, 2023

These people can’t even seem to comprehend that tools can be abused to the point where they don’t work anymore. To them, Heritage America is a mass of disposable cattle without souls whom they hold in contempt. Policy is made accordingly, but they also try to use us as a tool for their global agenda.

It’s worked before but we’ve been exploited and abused for so long that we’re no longer a population capable of fighting a huge conflict. The industrial base of America, and the middle-class it sustained, has been so hollowed out that we don’t even have the ability to sustain one either.

Perhaps one aspect of the path to Hell is that people can’t see they’re on it. There’s no way to win a war against Russia or China, and if we’re making progress at it, they’ve promised to use nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, the supply chain shutdowns entailed in a conflict with China would plunge this country into chaos. But, they keep pushing. It’s a kind of insanity that could only be biblical in its explanation.

The US warship USS Milius sailed through the Taiwan Strait on Sunday, in what the US Navy described as a ‘routine’ transit, just days after China ended its latest war games around the island https://t.co/rFWG9d0Lz3 pic.twitter.com/MypfuzXtax

— Reuters (@Reuters) April 17, 2023

Even Putin literally says that Russia is at war with “satanism.” The neocons aren’t even capable of desisting from a plot that’s failed. One of their dogs is now coming out with a new moniker to market the same strategy.

America's next president should be thinking in grand-strategy terms. It's time for modern-day NSC-68 – Truman's foundational document of U.S. Cold War strategy. The U.S. and its allies can't afford to drift aimlessly as history's tectonic plates shift. https://t.co/MBcvKgLeu8

— John Bolton (@AmbJohnBolton) April 13, 2023

There’s nothing new about it. Basically, a massive expansion of NATO and military spending. He wants a NATO-type organization for Asia, and Taiwan to be armed to the teeth. He asserts that the Russian/Chinese partnership can be broken up, along with the Russian Federation, after Putin is toppled following defeat in Ukraine. The Chinese can be induced to screw Russia over by offering them an eastern part of the federation. They’ll also be excluded from influencing the Middle East. So, basically this is how a new Cold War will be set up with China as the enemy this time around.

Bolton is being trotted out to propose a strategy fundamentally untethered from reality. First of all, the Russians aren’t losing. The situation in Ukraine will be resolved to their satisfaction. It could fall apart very quickly, but Bolton can keep lying until it does.

Second, the U.S. has sown death and destruction across the Middle East for over 20 years. China has been able to come in and set up a peace plan that acknowledges the interests of all sides. It’s introducing the use of the yuan and integrating the region with the Belt & Road Initiative. Overthrowing the governments that made these deals because they’re in the self-interest of their countries with leaders who want to get back to the old agenda that only serves Israel isn’t going to work.

Bolton is just a barking dog for these psychopaths. What makes his article interesting is that it seems they’re at least acknowledging that a kinetic war with China isn’t feasible, so it’s better to organize a coalition for a new Cold War against it. At the end of this, China would presumably be digested even though that never worked with Russia.

It also shows that they simply can’t back off from Russia no matter what happens in Ukraine. Thus, Bolton’s implication is that we’ll have a hot war and then a long cold one. In the end, his masters will get the total domination they’ve been seeking all along. I suppose this is how they’re salvaging the narrative without making any concession to reality about how badly things are going for them.

The post A Dog Barks, I Listen appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Brothers and sisters, have you ever been tempted to give up the fight? Have ever been so weary that you just want to rest? I’m sure you have, as have I. We’ve all been frustrated by the disinterest of too many of our people in securing a Southern future for our children.

I’ve heard friends, good friends, express that they don’t believe anything will change; or worse, truly believe that everything will continue to go in the direction of our godless enemies. That just burns me up! But honestly, I’ve had those feelings before. When you feel this way, sit and ask yourself – why you are even involved in what some might say is hopeless? Then imagine dogwoods, azaleas, and cherry blossoms in bloom. Ahh…how beautiful.

In a past life, I was somewhat of a musician, playing many different instruments, on many different stages. I even could sing a fairly decent tune, back in my day. Did I play or sing for the applause of the crowd? Not really, although it is always nice when someone enjoys my talent. But I did it because I love music, simply for its beauty, and wanted to be part of expressing that beauty to a listening crowd, to my own ears, or just to the wind.

Our mission is the same, to preserve beauty, and that beauty is Dixie. So, sing of her, speak of her, talk of her, write about her, and do it because she is beautiful, even if you are her only admirer.

Below is a poetic attempt to capture that spirit.

“The Minstrel”

The minstrel played,
To gather a crowd.
But no one came,
So, he played very loud.

‘Why did they not come?’
He thought to himself.
He sadly pondered,
To place his lute on the shelf.

Then he had another,
A thought to think beyond.
‘Maybe it was the tune?’
That the people frowned upon.

So, he changed his tune,
In hopes they would hear.
But no one cared to listen,
Now here’s the moral, my dear.

If you play to the crowd,
Then to them you belong.
And the crowd is always fickle,
So they won’t stay very long.

But if you play for the beauty,
For the tune in your heart,
No matter if there is a crowd,
The music will not depart.

Deo Vindice!

God save the South!

The post For The Beauty of Dixie appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

After a Kemp victory last November, Georgia’s political future has become clearer. While many people called Georgia a “blue state” after the Trump/2020 fumble, it’s now been proven that the Peach State still has enough genuine Georgians to keep an anti-White zealot like Stacey Abrams out of the governorship. Georgia’s monuments largely still stand intact, a new anti-child sex change bill (SB 40) has passed, the “Heartbeat” law has successfully returned, and gun rights have been expanded. On the other hand, long-term demographic issues are not looking great for Georgia; and due to the slow rising tide of liberalism, it’s imperative for Georgia to secede before the next gubernatorial election. At this point, the necessity for secession and state sovereignty has already been discussed at length on this site; thus, I will focus on what a Free Georgia could become once we exit the godless American Empire.

A major component of a Free Georgia will be ensuring that Southerners (bonafide Georgians) are running and managing the state. Enacting the county unit system in all statewide elections will be critical. This is a topic that has been discussed by the Georgia League of the South and at Identity Dixie but, nonetheless, it’s an important step to curtail the carpetbagger-dominated Metro Atlanta region and its growing political power. After the county unit system is reinstalled, something easily done without imperial domestic meddling, leftist Atlanta will have very little strength against a Southern Nationalist Georgia.

Once a Free Georgia has “caged the city bird” and liberated herself from the Empire, we can look forward to challenging the neocons (essentially a good ole boy system but without any loyalty to native Georgians) within the General Assembly. This won’t be as difficult as many imagine, as the voting paradigm would be drastically simplified and much more pragmatic with the implementation of the county unit system. This means a handful of Southern Nationalists could convince a squeamish representative to push for pro-Southern policies. It’s during this period that Southern Nationalist advocates would focus on restoring, and then solidifying, Georgia’s pro-Dixie cultural and social foundation.

For starters, one should look at the vast potential of Stone Mountain located outside of Atlanta. This is something unique to Georgia and the largest (currently) monument to the South’s efforts in the War for Southern Independence. In a Free South and Free Georgia, the monument in the park could properly be cleansed of anti-Southern political correctness and turned into a full tribute to the Old Confederacy. Imagine Confederate flags, and even new statues of heroes of the Confederacy, arranging the park in full glory? During every Confederate Memorial Month, the park could become a mecca for Southerners, not just in Georgia, but across all Dixie. The park should likely be given management to the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV), and despite not being perfect, could manage a pro-Southern atmosphere greatly. A fully Southernerized and even expanded Stone Mountain Park, with more museums and Confederate iconography, could really fire up the cultural independence in the South. Even smaller, less direct ways could be used to push the Southern cultural identity in Georgia – such as codifying our own “Groundhog Day” by refocusing the holiday explicitly around Georgia’s groundhog, General Beauregard Lee. There are many more creative ways Georgia Southern Nationalists could push and achieve cultural strengthening post-political independence. While many scoff at this as “impossible,” it’s only impossible if we lack the leadership, vision, and political will to accomplish it.

This re-Southernization movement would be much easier to achieve due once the Democratic Party has been politically neutered. With the county unit system back in place and a federal government out of the way, Georgia could manage herself in a true Southern manner. As for a military, we could easily morph whatever remains of the Georgia National Guard into a new “Army of Georgia,” fastened with the old 1956 Georgia flag as their battle colors. Obviously, this new unit would be used for home defense. I’m sure in the immediate years after independence, Georgia will increase funding to the new Georgia Military Institute in Marietta, one which was destroyed by Sherman’s army in 1864, to train a new officer corps loyal to Georgia. In all military matters, the state should seek to be self-sufficient and ready to defend her independence against any threats.

This brings me to the idea that many also have – that Georgia is a purple or “non-White” state; thus, the Left would “rebel.” In truth, I could envision a few violent riots in Atlanta, like we saw with “Cop City” but the new “Army of Georgia” would quickly and efficiently remove such threats. Antifa cowards will flee Georgia for whatever American Union will remain, followed by many leftists urbanites who won’t want to live in a Free Georgia. The idea of Georgia being a leftist-controlled state is a danger and it will happen if we do not leave the American Empire. Ironically, it is rather interesting that the people with the most hate for Georgia are “America Firsters,” still sore that Georgia rejected Trump’s efforts to control the governorship. In truth, Georgia’s issues are many but still manageable, especially when we turn off the foul-smelling sewage line coming from the imperial capital.

Secession doesn’t cure everything for Georgia, but it will open the door for a better future and actual cures for our social, economic, and political ills.

-By Georgian Southern Nationalist

The post GAXIT! Free Georgia Now appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Beautiful Loser Syndrome (BLS) is when someone does something that they know will result in defeat because to do otherwise would allegedly violate their moral principles. “I’d rather lose than win by playing dirty,” is the often the refrain. Sufferers of BLS pride themselves on things like “sticking to their guns” and “taking the moral high ground.” Many of them imagine themselves as the type of person who may not agree with what someone says but will defend to the death their right to say it. In other words, it’s capitulating but being a snob about it. Given that you are a reader of this fine and august website, you’re intelligent enough to have already surmised that I’m talking about the Grand Old Party.

BLS is most often present when the person in question believes they are operating in hypothetical terms and realms, is lazy, a coward, or a liar who uses BLS as a pose. One of my most well-worn hobby horses is that when a group of people is doing something, there is generally some mix of motivations. Even at the individual level, someone can have multiple reasons for doing something, although one may weigh more heavily than others.

When it comes to those people who think they’re dealing purely in hypotheticals, they treat politics like a debate between Jordan Peterson and Sam Harris. Nothing about either of their lives is really going to change based on the debate outcome, barring a couple days where clips of the debate get passed around niche social media platforms. They see it as verbal jousting with a friend, as opposed to making decisions about the lives other people.

The GOP does the exact same thing with politics. They view arguing over legislation as a fun mental exercise, but they won’t go as hard as Democrats (because it’s rude or against decorum). They may lose the argument and the piece of legislation their debate team was told to argue against gets passed, but for most of them it doesn’t change their lives. They’ll still go back to their tawny DC townhouse until the session is over, then go back to their even snootier, upscale dwelling in, or at least near, their district. They don’t consider the consequences of things like inflation because, for them, it isn’t real. The price of food doubling doesn’t really change what their servants buy because their grocery bill is an insignificant fraction of their legal income. Not to mention all the bribes, kickbacks, sinecure jobs for their families, etc. It’s easy for them to look down their noses at those cheaters in the other wing of the Uniparty and comfort themselves (and their voters) by talking about how they didn’t compromise their values.

The lazy and the cowardly can be lumped in together, because they’re both using BLS for the same purpose. They can stand tall, proud of the sacrifice they’ve made for their voters because they didn’t stoop to the level of the people who actually won. They’re losing on purpose, you see. The lazy don’t want to go through the work of coming up with some opposing legislation, debate it on the floor, work with the other party, etc., so they simply refuse to compromise on moral grounds they actually have no interest in holding. They just don’t feel like doing their job. The cowards aren’t brave enough to have their names attached to a piece of legislation or some action, because it would mean they have now gone on record with a particular opinion. When that opinion becomes unpopular, they must defend it and that’s just too darn tough for those delicate flowers. Men far wiser than I have explained the cowards perfectly when discussing libertarians. They take the sidelines and pretend it’s the high ground.

The liars do the same thing but use BLS as a shield. They are no more interested in conservatism or protecting their constituents than a fish is fascinated by a telescope. These are the Republicans who are on the way to becoming “mavericks,” “moderates,” or one of the other euphemisms leftists use when describing a Republican that votes with the Democrats on everything (looking down into Hell at you, John McCain). They are simply at the point in their traitorous evolution where they’ll work to sabotage things, and then lie about their intention. These are either leftists who ran as Republicans because they were in a red district, or people who’ve been bribed and blackmailed into being liberal operatives in an elephant mask.

The lazy and cowardly can be cajoled or shamed into doing what’s right and the liars are a lost cause. The most dangerous form of this particular brand of idiot is the high-minded philosopher. They’re the ones who often lead the charge, allowing the lazy and cowardly to simply agree with them and sit back down. These political speculators often give the liars a position to take, with the additional insulation of not doing it first. They will allow their enemies to lead committees because it would just be mean to do otherwise. Attaching a poison pill rider to a bill is just playing dirty and that’s not “who we are,” or so they tell us. It isn’t hard to find examples of Lincoln’s Party failing, when they easily could have done one of 50 things Satan’s Party has done to change a rule or piece of legislation in the previous six months.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The only people who see these losers as beautiful are themselves. The enemy doesn’t even pay them lip service for their capitulation. They simply view them as conveniently weak and deserving only of derision. Most of the time, their reaction is the same irrespective of whether the Republican in question capitulated or resisted. This isn’t to say the enemy doesn’t appreciate the utter lack of effective resistance. Everyone likes an opponent who ties one hand behind their back and surrenders as soon as the fight starts. They just have no respect for it. Their constituents don’t cheer for their defeat, self-righteous and intentional though it may be. In fact, nobody really likes the Beautiful Losers, except maybe the wealthy donor-class and, of course, their opponents.

It was pointed out that states with bolder Republicans tend to be ones where the margin of victory for the Party of Stupid tends to be much smaller. I think this is because the representatives don’t have the luxury of being a shoo-in for re-election. When a state is basically run by one party, the threat of the other party taking a seat is low. When an “elected” official does what they’re told, they don’t have to worry about getting primaried, either. When there’s a chance that a state can actually change what color it is on the electoral map or a seat isn’t so sure a thing, the politicreature has to work a little harder and actually differentiate itself from the other team. It goes back to a lack of consequences and being able to treat it like it’s all one big game.

The post The Beautiful Losers appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

The war in Ukraine was over before it started. This has nothing to do with the Ukrainian people – most of whom I believe to be good folks. Rather, this has everything to do with a hyper dependence of Eastern Europe on the United States for its protection, and the inability of the U.S. to keep its promises of that protection. The fact is, the United States is neither functionally nor strategically capable of large-scale warfare for any sustained period of time. It is not a matter of will or money. It is a matter of logistics. The following article will explain the logistical reasons why Russia was always going to win its military and geostrategic objectives in Ukraine, thanks to American limitations. Poland, Hungry, Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Finland, etc. – this article is for you.

Before I begin, I have worked in both Ukraine and Russia. My counterparts in both countries were extraordinary. This was especially true of my aviation colleagues, at companies such as Volga-Dnepr, where I would routinely utilize AN-124s and IL-76s for my large-scale Middle East, African, Central and Southwest Asian intermodal air-sea-ground projects. This goes back to my military and government contracting days during the height of the Afghan and Iraq Wars. I have nothing against either people. I do, however, support Putin’s war with Kiev for a number of reasons that I have covered in the past on Identity Dixie. I pray for a rapid peace in that which will remain of Ukraine. Hopefully, the Ukrainian people can discharge the yoke of foreign intrigue and globalist manipulation in the aftermath of this war.

Returning to the reason Russia was bound to win this war with Ukraine, the answer is simple: the United States is not structurally designed for a protracted war requiring copious amounts of materials. In essence, the U.S. abandoned its logistical superiority after the Vietnam War. There are both strategic and practical reasons for this shift in military thought. This requires an historic understanding of the origins of this shift and why the United States is ill-equipped to fight modern, 21st Century wars.

From 1861 – 1945, the U.S. military relied on logistical superiority to win wars. Whether it was the extensive use of railways and Northeastern production, or the ability to gain early port dominance, the Union largely won the war because it was able to quickly get men and materials into key locations and then use that numerical superiority – most often haphazardly – against Confederate forces. This concept was expanded when future Rear Admiral/then Captain, Alfred Thayer Mahan, U.S. Navy, wrote The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660 – 1783.

Mahan’s book, which focused on the ability to dominate Sea Lines of Communications (SLOCs) and enjoy strategic dominance on a global scale, compelled an emerging American Empire to annex Hawaii and go to war with Spain to both eliminate a foreign Caribbean threat and simultaneously expand American influence in the Philippines. This dominance of its own regional waters, as well as, an expansion of power in the Pacific was forward thinking for the time. It saw an emerging Asia – specifically Japan – as a threat to its long-term strategic needs. Correspondingly, American political manipulation within Colombia led to the creation of a new country, Panama, and a new canal, designed to facilitate the transference of naval assets between the Atlantic and the Pacific Oceans. This also sped the transfer of large-scale cargo from coast to coast for a new transcontinental power.

World Wars I and II were definitive expressions of American logistical might. The ability to outproduce and transport materials to Europe or (WWII) Asia, ensured an American victory in both wars. Fresh men in World War I were important, but the added fuel, aircraft, food, and mechanized vehicles empowered the remainder of the Triple Entente to steal a victory from Germany on the eve of its victory. In World War II, the Soviet Union, which is often credited with winning the war, could not have succeeded without the Lend-Lease Act. Both Nikita Khrushchev and Georgy Zhukov stated as such in subsequent years. The American ability to arm, equip, and feed the Soviet war machine from 1941 – 1945 empowered the communists to defeat the German Nationalists (and their allies) on the Eastern Front.

During the war in Korea, Halford John Mackinder’s Heartland Theory – effectively the Eurasian dominance concept – directly clashed with Mahan’s naval dominance theory. The ability of the Communist Chinese and the Soviet Union to send men and materials quickly to North Korean forces, or sometimes fight on their behalf, caught a less-committed American/United Nations force off-guard. The end result was a yet-to-be resolved stalemate. This was the beginning of the end of an American reliance on logistical dominance as a function of strategic planning. In effect, the Americans provided little to no solution on its reliance upon extended supply lines to counter a much larger conventional force with matched production capacity closer to the war theater.

Vietnam marked the end of a reliance on American logistics superiority to win wars. During Vietnam, the Robert McNamara-led Department of Defense was able to overwhelm Vietnam with men and materials. In this regard, the U.S. learned some lessons from Korea as it pertained to the use of forward air bases and regional supply missions to ensure material support for combat functions. Where it failed was a misunderstanding of the nature of the conflict. An outstanding book entitled The War Managers, by Douglas Kinnard, highlights the disconnect between senior commanders in Washington, D.C., and local commanders dealing with the realities of a protracted guerilla war. The lessons extrapolated from that war would eventually become that which would be called “The Weinberger Doctrine.”

In 1984, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, Casper Weinberger, effectively codified American strategic thought through a series of questions and answers that can best be summarized as the following: (1) is this in America’s best interest to engage in conflict; only commit forces to such conflicts; (2) only commit to wars in which there is a complete commitment to winning; (3) political and military objectives should be clear and set from the beginning – achieve them and withdraw; (4) continually reassess military needs, committing troops and materials to victory, while simultaneously reevaluating if the cost of combat still serves American strategic priorities; (5) political consensus of the American people and Congress must be assured – do not go into a war without them; (6) combat should always be a last resort.

The Powell Doctrine would effectively add to this “international support” and an “exit strategy.” Ultimately, the Weinberger Doctrine and the refined Powell Doctrine would lead to that which could best be described as a new American strategic embrace of blitzkrieg. A combination of inter-departmental cooperation by virtue of the Goldwater-Nichols Act and a new U.S. Special Operations Command emerging from the disastrous Operation Eagle Claw led to a different type of warfare – fast, politically controlled, and designed for immediate post-operation withdrawal. Desert Shield/Desert Storm was the ultimate culmination of a new American strategic paradigm.

However, some lessons of Desert Shield were completely ignored due to its success. When Iraq swept into Kuwait on 2 August 1990, then President George H. Bush laid down an ultimatum. When that ultimatum was ignored, the President ordered the U.S. Army’s XVIII Airborne Corps into Saudi Arabia on 7 August 1990, led by the elite 82nd Airborne Division. For the next three days, soldiers from the 82nd ate Burger King – the only available food and water available to them beyond the one MRE they each brought as a ready response. It was not until U.S. Navy supply ships, prepared for sustained Marine Expeditionary Units arrived, that the 82nd achieved independent water resources and ammunition in excess of thirty total rounds per soldier. American military planning has grown significantly worse since that time.

After the end of the Cold War, the United States military chose to outsource its long-term military logistics infrastructure through two primary contract mechanisms. In part, this was always the case through the U.S. Merchant Marines (distinct from the Marine Corps). The ability to effectively commandeer commercial vessels for military purposes has been a long-standing tradition in Western military service for centuries. What changed, however, was the nature of disaggregated production and distribution control. This is where my personal experiences allowed me to witness American military logistics inefficiencies firsthand.

The two primary means of transportation augmentation for distribution needs are the Civilian Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF) program and the Universal Services Contract (USC) for ocean transportation. Ocean is the more cost effective and efficient means of transporting larger scale material needs. Air is better suited for speed when cost is not a determining factor and materials are small enough to fly safely. Where these two break down are global capacity and intermodal coordination.

CRAF is hamstrung by the fact that it is a uniquely American program with very few international freight aircraft available within the program. The types of aircraft are limited based on distance and capacity. Companies such as Southwest, a CRAF partner, may be able to augment the fleet with available aircraft from a company like Lynden International – which has older C-130s operating out of Alaska – but the limitations outweigh the benefits. National Air Cargo or Kalita can only service so much in a contractor role – and then they need to have the staff available to manage loading, load masters, pilots, and additional resources to unload. Even when they get to that point, the imperial military is not equipped to manage ground transportation. An overreliance on regional truckers eventually facilitates new contract arrangements to fill this gap – which is primed for exploitation, theft, and simple cultural miscues. The U.S. military is then placed into the position of either burdening the air transportation company with finding ground facilitators or directly contracting with them.

Since the former is easier than the latter, the result is yet an additional layer of disconnect between the strategic needs of the U.S. Department of Defense and the local unit operators supplied through entities like the Defense Logistics Agency or the U.S. Army’s Surface Deployment and Distribution Command. I was the primary ground facilitator in Afghanistan and elsewhere – coordinating between ocean vessel operators, air operators, truckers, hydraulic operators, and enhanced in-transit visibility (EITV) supply tracking entities from 2010-2017 on the ground in more than a dozen countries. At one point, nearly 75% of all cargo exiting Afghanistan moved through my hands in some way. The system is a mess and every time a new suggestion was gaining traction, a commander would get changed and the process would start all over. But it gets worse…

In addition to the capacity restrictions placed on the CRAF program, ocean vessel operators (USC) were at an additional disadvantage through the demand for U.S. Flag Vessels (e.g., Jones Act compliance), which are very rare due to regulatory and insurance reasons, and stevedoring issues at commercial ports. Unlike aircraft, which can fly into and out of friendly air bases, the ocean vessel operators had to deal with commercial operators at often unfriendly countries to facilitate the supply needs of the U.S. military. The local union in Karachi, for example, cared very little about the supply needs of the Marine Corps on Camp Leatherneck. Even when I would personally get those issues resolved, a new level of complexity would emerge: diplomatic note/cargo.

Since imperial war supplies are technically government owned materials, they are required to undergo the importation process of the countries they seek to transit in order to bypass tariff payments. This would manifest all over the world – whether I was working in Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Georgia, or Latvia. Transborder crossings needed paperwork to facilitate deeper supply chain deliveries. Even countries that had direct seaports, such as Djibouti or Iraq, maintained control of their own customs clearance processes that were rarely a priority of the diplomatic staff at the resident U.S. Embassy. Consequently, if you wanted to land armored vehicles into Iraq as part of a training program for the new Iraqi Army, you would need diplomatic clearances to make that possible. But it gets worse, and this is where the U.S. military is incapable of supporting its allies during protracted periods of conflict.

The U.S. military designates cargo “White” and “Green.” Contractor cargo (White) and U.S. military assets (Green) follow separate process requirements and regulatory hurdles. The vast majority of consumption by the American military is White cargo – meaning that the contractors providing the materials are required to ensure the items are delivered to the final recipient, usually at a predesignated distribution facility that is often down range. This could be a mundane product – like toilet paper – to Fort Leonard Wood or it can be a sophisticated blue water Navy component to Diego Garcia. The manufacturer is often tasked with delivering the product to ensure payment (using an antiquated INCOTERM called “FOB Destination” on Contractor Line-Item Numbers – CLINs). In some cases, the terms of the contract may allow for the use of military logistics assets for hard-to-reach areas. Often, however, that is not the case.

The U.S. military does not have a centralized production facility. It outsources production to private companies. That is good. It increases production proficiency. However, it can create supply bottlenecks when those companies are asked to increase production to facilitate immediate demand for a host of reasons – from raw material availability to local labor constraints to licenses. The end result is that an unforeseen increase in production may take six-to-twelve months to meet demand. Winding down production at the end of an engagement can get costly, too. Exit strategies are difficult for private production facilities to meet when they are financially constrained by debt covenants that tie them to production quotas. This has an upstream impact on raw material availability and a downstream impact on transportation/distribution options. None of this is accounted for by senior military officers who are tasked with getting “stuff” into theater – but they are major concerns for the defense contractor.

To put it another way: banks lend money to companies that get new U.S. government contracts. The money continues to flow as long as the accounts receivable (AR) receipts show money will be coming from the U.S. government at some point to pay the tab. The U.S. government requisition process and contracting restrictions place the burden of delivery on the contractor. Thus, from the moment a contract is initiated to the point at which the production company is paid, it may take several months or potentially a year. Meanwhile, the contractor is covering a string of costs and attempting to anticipate the government client’s consumption. When that consumption suddenly ends, AR ends as well, which immediately limits access to capital. The company is then stuck attempting to pay the remaining bills with tightening capital availability. The slowed payments begin to create hesitancy for service and material suppliers. Thus, all of the parties tend to enter U.S. government contracts seeking to front load the costs as best as possible and keep a finger over the “stop” button out of an abundance of caution. All of this harms supply availability for the U.S. military. Of course, the American military never considered working with the banks to overcome this constraint because they do not understand it. But it gets worse…

Even the most cash flush companies still find themselves often wrangling with export procedures that are obscenely burdensome. For something like ice cream or underwear, it is simply a matter of an Automated Export System (AES) filing. But for companies building munitions or weapons systems – such as Raytheon, BAE, or Sikorsky – they have the additional hurdle of securing, processing, and maintaining export licenses. Again, the U.S. military does not have to deal with the DSP-5 or DSP-73 process. Meanwhile, despite the fact that the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) at the U.S. State Department is a governmental agency knowledgeable about the strategic missions of the U.S. DOD or government in general, it does not mean that the license issuing authority will move quickly. Added to this complexity are other governmental agencies (OGAs) that may be involved, such as the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) or the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and now you have new hurdles to consider. But it gets worse…

After getting through the maze of export control regimes, there is a good chance that the importing body on the other side of the world may have additional protocols. Imports into Francophone West Africa of electronic and aeronautical materials will require a Bureau Veritas approval… small arms ammunition or weapons may violate Wassenaar Arrangement restrictions embedded in Romanian import regulations… labeling instructions for United Nations agreed nomenclature for hazardous materials may need to be reviewed and will restrict ground transportation… the fact is, the United States military does not have to deal with any of these concepts when it is moving Green cargo, while White cargo is subjected to every single regulatory hurdle with additional hurdles to comply with Diplomatic Cargo for tariff free importation.

Then, after all of that, the commercial agents still need to arrange domestic transportation for the movement of cargo to the war theater or the military base. This requires ensuring there are no violations of Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Denied Parties or Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations as it pertains to bribes. If the product is not stolen in transit, the goods finally arrive. Only then can the invoice get cut – and the clock on advanced payment terms begins.

No one has ever done a substantive top-to-bottom and longitudinal study of the complexities of producing and moving commercially sourced war materials from resource identification to production to delivery – and all of the constraints therein. There is no urgency for such a study or understanding the process because it is entirely outsourced.

A politician makes a judgement call: “Go help Ukraine.” A general accepts the mission, then tells his partners: “Go help Ukraine.” A lower ranking general along, with a few field officers, determine that Ukraine needs X, Y, and Z. They tap into bureaucrats called Contracting Officers (“KOs” / not “COs” to avoid Command Officer confusion) or Contracting Officer Technical Representatives (COTRs) to work with GSA counterparts or other entities to identify suppliers. They issue contracts to suppliers and effectively say: “Send us the bill when you deliver the cargo.” Contractors of varying sizes and scopes begin working on the operation – with varying degrees of success or failure.

Summarizing the complexity of relying on the U.S. military to service the needs of U.S. strategic missions overseas: the American military may be able to provide short-term immediate assistance using its internal and externally contracted transportation options, but the majority will be facilitated by private enterprises that are dependent on extended supply lines and crippled by excessive regulatory hurdles. Not a single American politician has ever considered a blanket provision for wartime exports to meet strategic objectives despite almost two continuous decades of war that relied on external vendors to supply the U.S. military’s needs and not a single senior military commander ever asked them to consider such a provision!

In sum, the United States government is not equipped to handle the material needs of Ukraine in a protracted war. Russia knows this because the Russians are intimately familiar with the supply chain constraints that befell U.S. military operations in Afghanistan by virtue of our reliance on Russian rail to facilitate transportation through the Southern Distribution Network and the Northern Distribution Network. They are also familiar because Volga-Dnepr and Russian Rosoboronexport have been impacted by American International Trafficking in Arms Regulations (ITAR) at different times while serving American military needs. Finally, they are well aware, through their extensive control of Rare Earth Elements how challenging U.S. production of weapons can be.

To be sure, Putin would never allow a bureaucratic constraint to get in the way of supplying his military. If such a constraint were to emerge, his generals would immediately stop the issue in its infancy. American military leaders, by contrast, are divorced from this process. They would not know how to intervene even if they were aware.

Furthermore, the Russians are deeply committed to Mackinder’s Heartland (Eurasian) dominance concept. The Americans, meanwhile, act as if Mahan is still relevant by virtue of their large surface warfare ships, aircraft battle groups, and global network of allied ports – but they have abandoned his most important lesson: SLOCs are designed to facilitate the movement of materials for war and peace. They do not leverage their naval dominance to facilitate military logistics.

Recognizing the supply chain trap and American logistical weaknesses, all the Russians had to do with Ukraine is the opposite of the Americans. Rather than run into a trap – using a blitzkrieg style of warfare – the Russians are methodically using a 21st Century version of siege warfare, allowing the defenders to exhaust their men and materials. As the men die, they are irreplaceable. As the materials are expended or destroyed, they may be replaceable, but the production and transportation restrictions make it painfully slow for the Ukrainians. In effect, the U.S. is not now – nor has been since the 1940s – designed to support an ally depending on American military supplies or enjoys the capacity to deliver them.

Thus, Russia can do what it has always done when it wins wars – remain patient: (1) allow the American and international community to place all of its materials Ukraine in a desperate attempt to vainly show initiative; (2) methodically dismantle the Ukrainian capacity to wage a largescale defensive war; (3) force a desperate international community into demanding a Ukrainian counter-offensive; (4) Ukrainians agree, exhaust their supplies and manpower for temporary success; (5) slowly integrate territory into the Russian Federation – like an ink blot spreading slowly as Ukrainian forces withdraw; (6) encourage more costly counter-offensives; (7) wait until the American and European production and distribution constraints bottleneck; (8) finish off the Ukrainians.

Today, we are between “6” and “7” – and there is nothing the Empire’s military can do about it because it never considered its outrageous logistics deficiencies.

The post Delivering a Ukrainian Defeat: Why Russia Will Win appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

When America keeps harping about China invading Taiwan by a certain date, what’s really going on is that it’s going to try and make Taiwan do something to trigger an invasion by this date. First, some historical primer.

Taiwan’s original population was aboriginals who now live up in the mountains. The Chinese who settled were often involved in things that didn’t prosper under government authority, such as piracy and smuggling. The Qing Dynasty really only controlled some fortified settlements.

When it was ceded to Japan, that was the first time anybody established a government over the whole island. The Japanese treated the locals like they were Japanese and developed the place, so they’ve always been well-liked. By the time it was handed over to the Republic of China, the locals used Japanese for business and Taiwanese at home.

The new government gave them a year to adopt the full use of Chinese, which was not intelligible by the Taiwanese. Their language was repressed, with even the parents of school children hit with fines for every word their child spoke. It was also corrupt and viewed the Taiwanese contemptuously as Japanese collaborators to plunder. The killing of a local led to an uprising which was put down by massacring over 20,000 people. General Chiang Kai-shek is viewed by many as a villain.

The island received an enormous influx of mainlanders in a chaotic retreat after he was defeated by Mao. Many of them were soldiers who settled down with local women, meaning that at this point, most Taiwanese have backgrounds that include the original settlers. The pro-unification crowd were mainlanders and their children. That’s not true with the locals and the younger generations who are often incensed at the notion.

Former President Ma Ying-jeou recently visited the mainland. He’d moved the island into closer economic cooperation with it during his eight years in office, leading to students occupying the legislature (had some color revolution hallmarks). He was born in Hong Kong during the retreat, so many Taiwanese view him as an interloper who is trying to give away their country.

They see themselves as a distinct entity from the mainland with which they’ve had a very fraught history. The alternative media has good coverage, but it often paints the situation as two sides who both acknowledge themselves as China. That’s not the case, and this context is very important.

The only reason the name hasn’t been changed from the Republic of China is because the CCP made it a red line that would trigger military action. There’s not some pan-Chinese political sentiment in Taiwan or Hong Kong. That’s why the U.S. was able to convulse Hong Kong with violence and an 800,000 strong protest march after getting youths organized and trained in antifa black block tactics. Color revolutions are based on real grievances.

Just like in Ukraine, the United States moved in to weaponize sentiments produced by real historical experiences to create a situation it can exploit. It’s got a lot less to work with in Taiwan, however. The Ukrainian situation was ripe for a civil war to pull Russia in, but there’s no way to set off a conflict inside Taiwan. Most young people don’t want to join China. The U.S. is stuck trying to get them to keep embarrassing China with stunts until it takes action. Hopefully, this isn’t a good enough reason for the CCP to start World War 3.

China says 'Taiwan independence' acts pose 'greatest danger' to peace pic.twitter.com/wyI0RLIpOl

— Zhang Meifang张美芳 (@CGMeifangZhang) April 10, 2023

Millions of the Taiwanese also work in mainland China, where a large percentage of the island’s net worth has been invested. Overnight, it would be a failed state if China took any meaningful economic or financial action against it. Ultimately, it’s like the situation in the Melian Dialogue. If China wants something from Taiwan, nothing is going to stop it. Power decides, not principle.

The simulated blockades have been face-saving demonstrations. All China would need to do in order to bring the island to its knees would be to do something like cutting off cross-strait transactions. This would also cause lots of havoc in China, but it would be better than opening the Pandora’s Box of military action.

That situation is one with which I’ve got some familiarity, and it’s quite insane to consider. During the island-hopping campaign to Japan, the American military opted to bypass Taiwan. Much of the island’s geography consists of high, steep mountains. The east coast is pretty narrow, with steep rocky coastline on the rough, open Pacific. The west coast, along the strait, is where the population is situated. It’s separated from the east by mountain ranges, with some elevations over two miles high.

It seems like there are two feasible western spots if the weather is good. There’s a massive port in the southern city of Kaohsiung with a large airport nearby. On the far side of the harbor there’s a beach, which could be the first step in seizing the port. Up north, outside of Taipei, there are beaches adjacent to Taoyuan International Airport. They’d probably go for both.

It would be pretty buck wild, because these are huge population centers and there’s not a lot of beach to play around on. If the locals decided to resist and pound with artillery from the much better elevations and cities nearby, it would be very unpleasant because everything would be going into tiny kill boxes. The Chinese would end up killing more civilians than we’ve seen since World War 2 trying to take out assets parked among the population to fire at them.

I’d rate the state of the Taiwanese military as highly questionable. I’m sure the neocons are salivating at having battles of Bakhmut all over the island but that’s an iffy proposition. For instance, the military relies on conscripts who now serve for a matter of months and aren’t really trained up to the standards of what Russia went up against last year.

When I was there several years ago, they even conscripted officers. If you have good grades, you could be a lieutenant for a year. I watched a sergeant cuss one out in front of his platoon for not getting his role in formation right. The sergeant wasn’t a conscript, so he had a different status. The conscripts are poorly paid and motivated. The video game addiction and masculinity crisis is even worse in Asia than it is here, so there’s not a big pool suitable for protracted urban combat.

It’s an extremely dense population, living mostly in high rise concrete buildings. There’s also no room to maneuver or conduct warfare away from population centers. If they wanted to evacuate them like Ukraine, there’s nowhere to go because the island is so crowded. Ukraine is over 40x the size of Taiwan, which again is mostly mountains.

The other thing here is that Russia can launch massive wave attacks with missiles and not take down the entire Ukrainian power grid. One strike like that could cripple every major piece of infrastructure in Taiwan because there isn’t much of it. A humanitarian crisis of dense cities without power or water would ensue rapidly. The fact that this infrastructure is also used by the military has been used as a justification for hitting it repeatedly by the U.S. So, there’s a precedent.

I can say quite confidently that there’s absolutely no way for Taiwan to hold out if China decided it had to be physically subdued (regardless of the human cost). However, the only scenario by which this could realistically happen is probably if it was decided that there was a major risk of the American Empire cooking something up so there had to be an immediate fait accompli. It would make the CCP look very bad to kill who they assert are Chinese people by the hundreds of thousands.

If they wagered that time was on their side, there are much better options available. The first is Kinmen Island. I got to tour its defenses while tagging along with American officers in civilian clothes about 15 years ago. It’s so close to the mainland you can look out of a gun emplacement and see it. The emplacements are linked by a rabbit’s warren of tunnels in the granite. They even carved a movie theater out of it.

All the way back then, the idea of this place holding out was laughable. The Taiwanese told us about all the reinforcements they’d be able to deliver within 48 hours. An American colonel joked at lunch that it would be over in less than five minutes. After that, there would be Penghu, which is out in the middle of the strait. Flattening these places would be pretty easy given their proximity.

If the main island was the target, they’d be getting taken down either way, but they’d also serve as a pretty compelling warning if the goal was forcing the Taiwanese government to come to terms. I’ve heard from drunken Taiwanese about how the government would pass out guns and they’d fight in the streets. If it becomes clear that the U.S. isn’t going to enter the conflict, the majority of the public would probably resign themselves to the inevitable rather than getting the place destroyed in the process.

The struggle between freedom and despotism is universal. https://t.co/pwD25STfpR

— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) February 26, 2022

The outcome of the Ukrainian conflict will change some critical elements of public perception. Primarily, it will demonstrate that the U.S. can be intimidated into not entering a conflict on behalf of a proxy. That’s what the Ukrainians hope but it’s not going to happen. China knows when the truth comes out the world will be a new place.

My suspicion is that all this bluster from the Empire is to provoke military action against Jinmen. In this harebrained scheme, China will be intimidated by American power from going any further while the U.S. will be able to use this as a justification for strangling China.

This would align with the neocon stupidity which is destroying Ukraine. In that plan, Russia would be too intimidated to enter the conflict directly. The Ukrainians would wipe out the Russian separatists, while the U.S. would impose the current sanctions by using Russian support for their militias as a justification. You can’t take the stupidity of what they come up with as a reason why they won’t go through with it.

My assumption is that the United States wouldn’t interfere with an operation against Taiwan. Our assets, like carriers, are too vulnerable and this propaganda about how we could go in and wipe out a modern military has been exposed as a nonsensical bluff by Putin. That’s not my worry.

What alarms me is that we’re still faced with a collapse scenario if just the semiconductor output from Taiwan stops. China deciding to cut us off would plunge this nation into chaos. The U.S. uses the dollar to import its prosperity, so in many ways we’re more vulnerable than any other nation. Sure, China is quite reliant on imports as well, particularly food. Ultimately, it’s the glass house thing. Neocons and their tribe are notoriously bad at remembering what they live in.

The post The Next War? appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Book Review of The Honorable Cause: A Free South (2023), Padraig Martin, editor

From a faraway European perspective, it may sound odd to reminisce about the tragic history of the post-bellum South. College books in the U.S. and EU still portray the South in an anecdotal, quasi–Wild West manner, the North being depicted as the eternal beacon of humanity and progress and the South as a territory of always lurking ugly White racists. The process of demonization of the South is well described by one of the contributors to the book, Jude Ruffin, who notes how the Empire subjected the South “to every form of degradation, from the mocking of our speech to the lampooning of our national character.”

The Honorable Cause: A Free South, is a collection of essays written by people active in the cause of Southern Nationalism. It is valuable not only because of its throwing additional light on the rich Southern cultural heritage, but also because the contributing authors provide the blueprint for a better understanding of today’s racially polarized America in decline. These essays also serve well for a better understanding of the meaning of White identities, both in Europe and the U.S. An average Irishman, a Catalan or a Breton, who has never set foot in the U.S., let alone having any idea about the history of Southern culture, will better grasp the message of the present essays than an American resident scholar residing on the East or West Coast.

The book consists of twelve essays by contemporary Southern authors, each of them taking his/her own stand on the Southern heritage with the underlying message: the South is not the “Lost Cause.” It can live and it can survive despite the onslaught of liberal political debauchery and the leftist cancel culture.

When reading the book, what comes to mind is the manifesto, I’ll Take My Standwritten by several Southern academics almost a hundred years ago, in which they describe the efforts of the plutocratic North to despoil and brainwash the South. Does that sound familiar today? A hundred years later, the process of brainwashing the so-called “reconstructed South” was applied again by Northern world-improvers and their Soviet partners in Germany and Europe, in what was euphemistically called “reeducation.”

For this reason alone, this book represents a timely sequel to the prose of early Southern Agrarians. It should be read twice, not just by aspiring White nationalists in America, but also by the larger academic community in Europe and America. The beauty of each of those twelve essays, albeit also their difficulty, is that each essay could easily expand into a separate book. What transpires from this book, however, is that the Southern cause stands not just for a specific geographic location or a limited time span of history. Being a Southern Nationalist today, however awkward this expression sounds, means first and foremost having a different mindset and being proud of a unique brand of Western civilization. Metaphorically speaking, one can be a good Southerner even if not born in the South. To a large extent, citizens of European ancestry, wherever on earth they now reside, are subject to a predicament similar to that faced by Southern Nationalists. We all face similar fake news, we are all subjected to a similar Great Racial Replacement project, and we are all undergoing a similar process of extinction at the hand of the Global Liberal Reconstructor. Fortunately, the number of Southerners with a strong sense of their identity as White Southerners, and with a sense of their interests as White Southerners, is growing.

America’s South, or what remains of it, appears in many aspects more European than Europe itself, a continent which has turned by now into its own cadaverous parody. In fact, many Southerners, even simple country folks from the Ozarks, still display a sense of civic duty and decency, sincere compassion, unfaked smiles, and politeness that are long gone in Europe. The South still has its distinct taste and flavor, not just in its culinary achievements, but also in a way of communication, well noted in Dixie O’Hara’s essay, “Aprons of Resistance: The Role of Women in Southern Dissidence.” Home-grown black-eyed peas or roasted chicken are far more appetizing in a small restaurant in Alabama than at some generic Denny’s along US 101.

But the South is more than just Cajun cuisine or Dolly Parton’s songs. Although now isolated and vilified, Southern Nationalists represent a peculiar breed of people that cannot be found anywhere else in the Western hemisphere. The word “honor” for instance and its verbal derivatives, used and abused by many in Europe and the U.S., retains for them its original old Latin honestas significance. It denotes constant self-inspection and an inborn character endowment that can neither be sold nor bought. In her contribution, “Reconsidering Our Nation,” Anne Wilson Smith also adds an important insight on Southern character, namely “skepticism towards (all) authority.” Put more descriptively, many Southerners abide by unwritten rules that the interests of community, kinship bondage, as well as a sense of sacrifice for the common good that precedes the individual’s sense of self-interest.

Yes, the South had given birth to distinct people, and as James Edwards notes in his introductory essay, “There’s No Place Like Home,” “great men are never made except through great trials,” a feature that can less and less be detected in Europe today, even among many self-proclaimed White nationalists. In his contribution, Father O’Dabney seconds Edwards with his simple yet profound words that “greatness is born in humility.”

The Other and the SameMany educated Europeans, especially modern high-culture White nationalists, have rightfully and for decades been very critical of America’s mercantile mindset, fleeting human relationship, hyper-individualism and excessive Judeophile messianism in American foreign politics. This is not the case with Southern Nationalists. The American global Empire and Americanism (whatever the words ‘Americanism’ and ‘America’ mean in a so-called nation that has by now almost half of non-White non-European citizens) can find their sharpest critics precisely among Southerners, as exemplified by a well-researched Rick Dirtwater’s piece, “Americanism: Death of the South.”

Many critics of the South, especially in Europe, are mistaken when they assume that the whole of the South is run by contingents of Bible-thumping Christian Zionists. Unfortunately, lots of foreign outsiders have never made acquaintance with the Deep South. The irony of history is that early Southerners were far more successful in preserving many ancient European traits in their culture, such as chivalry and self-sacrifice than Europeans did. It is often overlooked, even by many conservatives and rightwing literati in France and Germany, that the antebellum and postbellum South was at some point in its history the only speck in the Western hemisphere that was not plagued by the ideas of the 1792 French Jacobins and their egalitarian delirium. Nor was it infected by the European 1848 Liberal Revolution and its secular religion of economic progress. Moreover, the South was fully spared from the 1917 Bolshevik nightmare and its subhuman creature homo sovieticus. This has now changed for the worse, as noted by Michael Hill’s succinct comment: “Liberal Democracy has become the civic religion of America and the West.”

Indeed, what communist utopia could not accomplish in East Europe, Liberalism is now carrying out in a far more sophisticated manner, fully enforcing its destructive transgender and paleo-communist ukases in the “reconstructed” South. The D.C. Deep State doxing and demonizing of Southern thinkers and academics, as the contributor Harmonica (pseudonym) notes in his “Adversaries of the South: The Left’s Failed Elites,” makes the entire American-imposed educational system in the South look like a carbon copy of the former Soviet People’s Commissariat for Communications. In her contribution, Rebecca Dillingham illustrates this Sovietization process of the system brainwashing, noting that America:

“…is an amorphous blob composed of polyglot territories cobbled together by secular fictions, utopian fantasies, consumerism, covetousness, degeneracy, and hubris.”

Frankly, I’ve never seen a more succinct, absolutely accurate description of contemporary America.

Southern Nationalism can also stand as a shorthand for White nationalism worldwide. Can they be used synonymously? Yes and no. Let us face it. White nationalists have for centuries shown that they are their own worst enemies. Neil Kumar, who is himself of mixed racial origin, raises a haunting yet critically important question regarding the future of Southern (and) White identity. He states a very unpleasant truth for many Whites world-wide. “Far from joining hands as racial kinsmen, the kingdoms and then the nation-states of Europe have engaged in perpetual warfare against each other.”

After all, the war between Southern Confederates and the Northern Unionists was a war of people sharing the same gene pool. The list of inter-White wars, from mythical Troy to the Thirty Years War, from the Spanish Civil War to World War II and the recent Balkans wars, shows time and again that Whites enjoy killing each other on a grand scale. Witness the ongoing war between two closely related European peoples in eastern Ukraine (here).

The book raises more questions that it can possibly provide quick answers to. The co-editor of the book, Padraig Martin, offers some interesting formulas as to how to proceed with Southern revival and building White identity. One must agree with him that we must first and foremost abide by the law of the land “and minimize communications that are “anti-others.” This “anti-others” attitude is a typical feature of many White nationalists who build their national awareness solely on the hatred and exclusion of the Other, such as English vs. Irish, Serbs vs. Croats, Flemings vs. Walloons, North vs. South in the U.S. It’s a long list. Such a form of “negative legitimacy” in the quest of identity has been over centuries self-destructive for all White peoples, serving only the interests of hostile global elites.

The book is a must read for every student dealing with the issue of identity in postmodernity. Does one become a Southerner by decree, by birth, or by his free will? Must one become in the future a levitating airborne and rootless White nationalist without his soil beneath his feet, like many Jews who have carried for centuries their identity in a suitcase? What happens when a mischling, i.e., a person of mixed race, a “half-breed,” for instance of combined Kurdish and German ancestry decides to look for his new identity in his new Middle Eastern or German homeland? One must agree with modern sociobiologists’ claim that cultures can be learned and unlearned, homelands can be exchanged and swapped, mother tongues can also be fully forgotten and replaced by some weird global Sovietspeak or the virtue-signaling Liberal Volapuk. One can also change citizenship and obtain half a dozen different passports. But the iron laws of heredity can’t be learned or changed. Man’s genes are given; they are transmitted through the bloodline stretching through countless generations. They are the inborn material of every man and every Southerner regardless whether he lives in Atlanta or in New York, or decides to relocate to somewhere in Europe. The future identities of Southerners and for all Whites worldwide will be based on their inborn racial identity, hopefully moving beyond parochial turf wars with a first-door White neighbor. With present storms of huge racial replacement, Southerners, along with White nationalists, must consider where in the South, or where else on earth they will establish their own sweet home.

-By Tom Sunic, P.h.D and originally published at The Occidental Observer

Please consider purchasing a copy of The Honorable Cause: A Free South.

The post Home Sweet Home? The Southern Quest for Identity appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

Anyone familiar with the situation and actually considers a military confrontation between the U.S. and China to be a feasible proposition is an imbecile. For starters, this would entail a global supply chain collapse. That means your major security threat might not be the Chinese but your neighbors who decide to eat you. I plan on being more preemptive, but I haven’t informed mine about it.

US ‘open’ to deploying troops in Taiwan – lawmaker

Senator Lindsey Graham declared that he would 'fight for' the island because it’s 'a democracy'https://t.co/l012cxsItE pic.twitter.com/qHMNgXHBt9

— RT (@RT_com) April 9, 2023

The Chinese position is that if we have them on the ropes, they’d fight because there’s nothing left to lose at that point. In the meantime, they’ve been making earnest efforts to create an alternative system with the Russians that other countries can choose to join because it’s a better deal. A sort of peaceful global divorce, one could call it.

It’s not discussed by the American media, but most other countries would prefer a different system, especially as ours has rapidly become more insane. The fact that policy makers don’t understand this can be attributed to hubris, but perhaps even more so to a normalcy bias.

For as long as anyone has been alive, the American Empire was the only game in town. Everyone needed dollars, even the Soviet Union. Everybody on the planet was subjected to the economic and financial power of the United States. Decisions in Washington have been made accordingly.

The thinking is clearly that we still have this untrammeled power so it can be used for anything we want, no matter how much anyone else finds it objectionable. The conflict in Ukraine was supposed to be won by collapsing Russia’s economy overnight with sanctions. Everybody of note said that would happen, and then it didn’t. We’re in a new reality for which they’re unable to account.

The conflict was supposed to break Russia and then China, but it’s actually serving as the catalyst for their effort to break us. Our system is based on financial chicanery and military threats, while theirs is based on resources and productivity. They’re currently countering our threats as well.

It must be emphasized how historic this is: For decades, virtually all energy from the Persian Gulf was sold in dollars. Now China is buying LNG from the UAE in its own currency, yuan.

US economic hegemony has heavily relied on the petrodollar system, which is now breaking apart https://t.co/0TWxXBG2Bc

— Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) March 29, 2023

So, what’s quickly coming together is a new system, which doesn’t involve a new global reserve currency to replace the dollar (look up the Triffin Dilemma to see why they wouldn’t want one). Instead, trade can be done outside of the dollar in a variety of currencies. I’m not sure why this is hard to conceptualize for people in the Beltway.

Since Brazil is producing agricultural commodities and China is producing manufactured goods, they can use the yuan to exchange them and skip the step of changing money into dollars. It costs money to change money. Likewise, Russia can sell oil to India in exchange for rupees because it can use them to buy stuff.

If the currencies involved remain stable, it can work fine. Remember when Biden told us that the “ruble was rubble“? How could that have been done if it’s backed by massive energy exports? The scheme failed right away.

Foreign exchange performance measured against USD. The Russian ruble (RUB) is the best performing currency in the world. So much for Biden's "crush the ruble" strategy. Can anyone in Biden's gang shoot straight? pic.twitter.com/2HNR3SXTet

— Jim Rickards (@JamesGRickards) May 21, 2022

By the nature of what I do, I interact with people who run large international businesses. I was recently talking to such an American about this shift. He was incredulous that anyone would want the yuan outside of China and that Russia had acquired so much of it because of desperation.

Every prestigious publication has been harping about how Russia is getting crushed for the past year, so that’s how many people in high places interpret what’s going on. You’d sound like a crackpot contending otherwise in respectable company.

Back to the normalcy bias factor, this is an older guy who’s been making millions of dollars playing the only game that’s existed for his entire life, even in Beijing. I think that makes it hard to conceptualize a new game despite his business acumen.

It’s hard to understate how the world is changing. For instance, what’s going to happen in capital markets? If you’re making money in these other currencies, why not invest in them as well? The confiscation of Russian assets, both public and private, has been absolutely outrageous. It doesn’t take a crystal ball to see that lots of Chinese assets would be next if the confrontation moves forward.

Our system is not a “rules-based international order” that works for democracy, freedom, and human rights. It’s actually run more like a violent criminal enterprise that steals money by the hundreds of billions, engages in industrial terrorism (everyone knows we blew up Nord Stream 2), and promotes perversions that most of the planet finds sickening.

There’re also the endless wars everyone is getting really fed up with, enabling China to set up a Middle East peace plan that actually brings peace to the region and accelerates the de-dollarization. It’s not a surprise that works better than trying to topple every country that was unfriendly to Israel.

If smaller countries can be made safe from the U.S., they’ll take the new deal. The guy in Tunisia would’ve been an excellent candidate for a color revolution but clearly he’s received security assurances from certain parties. Last year, it would’ve still been extremely dangerous for any leader of a small country to tell the IMF to fuck off. We’re going to see more of this across the Global South.

We’re even seeing this understanding of an alternative order manifest in Israel, where the bloodthirsty Netanyahu Jews don’t want to accept that they can’t take the whole region over. They’re increasing their share of the population because the globohomo Jews aren’t reproducing.

It’s not hard for globohomo Jews to see that a new framework could offer Israel security and are fine with doing their gay pride parades within defined borders. They don’t want the Netanyahu Jews establishing a lock on power because they’ll never stop pushing until they get the place destroyed.

What this means for us, here in America, remains to be seen. I’ve been very hesitant about holding on to a lot of dollars since they started printing all the COVID money, but the U.S. also has a large portion of the global population locked down, so the strength of the dollar in international trade will probably persist for years to come.

We also seem to be buying ourselves more time by cutting off Europe’s affordable energy supply, so production has to move here where it’s cheaper. They’re quite unhappy about what’s being done but none of their governments represent them. Europe is a horse we’re going to beat until it keels over and dies.

I don’t think there are any good precedents for what we’ll experience. As Russia collapsed in the 1990s, millions died deaths of despair largely as the result of a looting operation. What they had going for them was resource autarky, a manufacturing base that was never exported, social capital, and a global economy that didn’t collapse along with it. So, they were able to pull out of the crisis once the proper leadership was in place.

The United States doesn’t have any of that going for it. We could have a real nightmare on our hands if we can’t import all of what we rely on for survival with dollars. I don’t think anyone who reads this publication requires a litany of our social and racial problems that could catch fire. We’d be much better off if this is a process that gets managed over the course of the next decade or so.

The bottom line is that our prosperity, if that’s what you want to call what’s currently going on in America, isn’t based on producing physical stuff. This can’t be sustained in the future. Whatever hardships lie ahead will be better than what this system will do to us if it doesn’t fall apart, so there’s certainly a bright side.

The post The Future Arrives appeared first on Identity Dixie.

View Details

“One day Saint Polycarp saw the ruler sitting in his chair and watching as the blood of Christians flowed like water.”

From the life of Martyr Polycarp of Alexandria (+4th century)

The murder of six innocent Christians at the Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee, by a deranged young woman in the grips of the demonic ideology of transgenderism seems to have opened the eyes of many to the reality of the spiritual warfare going on here in the States, that the forces of good and evil are locked in a battle for the souls and bodies of the people we see all around us.

Much of the ruling class and many blue states and cities agree with President Biden, who put out a statement on April 1st that reads in part:

“Transgender Day of Visibility celebrates the joy, strength, and absolute courage of some of the bravest people I know — people who have too often had to put their jobs, relationships, and lives on the line just to be their true selves. Today, we show millions of transgender and nonbinary Americans that we see them, they belong, and they should be treated with dignity and respect. Their courage has given countless others strength, but no one should have to be brave just to be themselves. Every American deserves that freedom. Transgender Americans shape our Nation’s soul…”

In a situation so unprecedented, so at odds with traditional mores, is there anything in the Southern tradition that can possibly help us here in Dixie to reestablish our feet on solid ground, to help us regain our bearings?