Human-Robot Interaction: Recent Episodes
Christoph Bartneck
This is the human-robot interactin podcast series in which we explore the relationship between humans and robots.
There’s been discussion on whether people should say please and thank you to their Alexa or Claude, but should Alexa, Claude, and their robot relatives always maintain their level of civility when responding back to us? What is the point of (im)politeness in robotics? Linguist Derek Bousfield (expert on human politeness), computer scientist Blake Jackson (expert on user expectations of robots in terms of politeness), and psychologist Merel Keijsers (expert on robot bullying) discuss the pros and cons of robots that are able to be rude to humans.
TranscriptThe transcript of the episode is available as a PDF. You can also follow the episode with subtitles through Descript.
HRI-Podcast-Episode-035-The-Case-For-Rude-RobotsISSN 2703-4054Important Links:* The Influence of Politeness Behavior on User Compliance with Social Robots in a Healthcare Service Setting * I’d blush if I could * Can’t you see I am bothered? * Stop ignoring me! * Computers are social actors * The morality of abusing a robot * Should we respect LLMs? * People are losing loved ones to AI-fueled spiritual fantasies * Tact in noncompliance
What do you do if somebody else publishes your thesis as a book? This is what happened to Andrew Vonasch. Together, we investigated this new type of scam. We discovered a flood of stolen theses and the thieves’ method to publish them on Amazon and through other resellers. I interviewed Richard Elliott and sought legal advice from Ursula Cheer. We confronted IngramSpark with this scam. They removed the theses from their system but made it practically impossible to prosecute the offenders.
TranscriptThe transcript of the episode is available as a PDF. You can also follow the episode with subtitles through Descript.
HRI-Podcast-Episode-034-Thesis-for-saleISSN 2703-4054Important Links:* Cognitive Frugality Preserves Self-Regulatory Resources (Book on Amazon) * Cognitive Miserliness Preserves the Self-Regulatory Resource (Andy’s thesis) * Copyright and Trademark Infringement Claims at IngramSpark * List of identified thesis theft * Letter of complaint to IngramSpark * First response from IngramSpark * Second response from IngramSpark
This episode is a live recording of the Raising the Bar event that took place on 10 September 2024 in Christchurch, New Zealand. I explore the long-standing promise of robots that would handle household tasks and serve as teachers, caregivers, and companions. Despite advancements in social robots, they remain absent from our daily lives. Figures like Elon Musk continue to push the dream of humanoid robots, yet we must first ask what tasks are best left to humans. The rise of human-like robots also challenges us to reflect on our own identity and humanity.
TranscriptThe transcript of the episode is available as a PDF. You can also follow the episode with subtitles through Descript.
HRI-Podcast-Episode-033-Where-Are-The-Robots-We-Were-PromisedISSN 2703-4054Important Links:* Raising The Bar Podcast * Able Mable Robot * Tesla Optimus bots were controlled by humans during the ‘We, Robot’ event
Robots are not just machines. We treat them as if they were somewhat like humans, including applying moral standards and expectations to them. Our behavior towards robots matters. The way we treat them reveals much about ourselves. In today’s episode, we will talk about how being nice is not the opposite of being cruel to them. I invited Bob Douglas and Mary Blossom from the AI Research Institute to introduce us to the topic. They agreed to produce a short podcast dialogue to get us started. I then discussed their introduction with Michael-John Turp and Minyi Wang.
TranscriptThe transcript of the episode is available as a PDF. You can also follow the episode with subtitles through Descript.
HRI-Podcast-Episode-032-The-One-About-EthicsISSN 2703-4054Important Links:* Stuff you should know * NotebookLM * Virtue and vice in our relationships with robots: Is there an asymmetry and how might it be explained?
Robots and AI are being portrayed in overly optimistic videos, television shows and advertisements. Tesla’s Optimus robot is a prime example. In this episode Dwain Allan and Christoph Bartneck interview John Petrocelli and Nick Lee on how this puffery, bullshit and lies affect consumers and vulnerable people. Such as Suzanne Barron, who believes that robots are possessed by Satan.
TranscriptThe transcript of the episode is available as a PDF. You can also follow the episode with subtitles through Descript.
HRI-Podcast-Episode-031-Puffery-Bullshit-And-LiesISSN 2703-4054Important Links:* Suzanne Barron * Helplines & Support * Your Cousin From Boston Dynamics Samuel Adams Super Bowl ad * Elon Musk unveils plan for ‘Tesla Bot’ with man dancing in a bodysuit * Tesla Optimus Robot Can Fold A Shirt * Still Not Significant * Clarity Communications by John Leaver who operates Digital Engine * Music: Remembering Past Everything by P C III is licensed under an Attribution License.
Humanoid robot companies are promising that humanoids will fast become our friends, colleagues, employees, and the backbone of our workforce. As Elon Musk described it when he first unveiled Tesla’s Optimus: “It will upend our idea of what the economy is… it will be able to do basically anything humans don’t want to do… it’s going to bring an age of abundance.”
But how close are we to this reality? What are the key costs associated with operating a humanoid? Can companies deploy them profitably? Will humanoids take our jobs, and if so, what should we be doing to prepare? To explore these questions, Dwain Allan and I interviewed Will Jackson, Jo Cribb, and Bruce McDonald.
TranscriptThe transcript of the episode is available as a PDF. You can also follow the episode with subtitles through Descript.
HRI-Podcast-Episode-030-Humanoidization-Costs-Demand-and-the-Future-of-WorkISSN 2703-4054Important Links:* Don’t Worry About the Robots NEW UPDATED FOR AI & COVID-19 * Ameca * Marc Raibert: Boston Dynamics and the Future of Robotics
A new wave of humanoids entered the scene and its creators promise us a great future. Atals, Figure, and Optimus are intended to work in spaces that are designed for humans. They are not only targeted at factories, but also at our homes and families. But what promises can they actually meet? Dwain Allan and I interviewd Will Jackson and Robert Riener on the future of humanoids.
TranscriptThe transcript of the episode is available as a PDF. You can also follow the episode with subtitles through Descript.
ISSN 2703-4054Important Links:* Optimus * Digit * Figure * Atlas * Agibot Raise A1 * Unitree H1 * Hubo 02 * Menteebot * Kepler Forerunner
Artificial Intelligence promise to improve many aspects of our lives. The current hype, in particular around Large Language Model, raises the questions what of these bold visions of the future is science and what is fiction. AI is not new in HRI. For many decades researchers used it to enable robots to better interact with humans. In this episode I talked with Julie Adams and David Kaber about what AI can really do for HRI.
TranscriptThe transcript of the episode is available as a PDF. You can also follow the episode with subtitles through Descript.
ISSN 2703-4054Important Links:* Opening RoboFab: World’s First Factory for Humanoid Robots * In Tesla Autopilot probe, US prosecutors focus on securities, wire fraud * Large language models for human–robot interaction: A review
The peer review process is essential to modern science. Researchers conduct studies and submit their results to a journal. An editor manages a review process involving external experts. But what happens when you study the peer review process itself? How do scientific organisations react when they become the subject of an experiment? Not well, to say the least.
This live recording is from the Nerd Night at the Little Andromeda Theatre in Christchuch, New Zealand.
TranscriptThe transcript of the episode is available as a PDF. You can also follow the episode with subtitles through Descript.
ISSN 2703-4054Important Links:* Presentation slides * The fate of published articles, submitted again by Peters and Ceci * Journal of Trial & Error * Journal of Universal Rejection * Nonsense paper written by iOS autocomplete accepted for conference * Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List * The Science Beyond the Horizon * How Professors Spend Their Time
Should you use chatGPT for podcasting? I asked chatGPT this question and used Descript’s Overdub feature to voice the response. Generating this episode was quicker than any other I ever created. Is it any good? Probably not. Still, it shows how quickly it is possible to generate superficial content. This might be useful for enabling robots to have superficial conversations with people. Just don’t expect any originality or accuracy.
TranscriptThe transcript of the episode is available as a PDF. You can also follow the episode with subtitles through Descript.
HRI-Podcast-Episode-026-Should-I-Use-ChatGPT
ISSN 2703-4054
Publishing your human-robot interaction study in a journal is an excellent way to share your insights. But in which journal should you publish and what do the journals expect? In this episode, we talk to editors from the three dedicated HRI journals, Agnieszka Wykowska (International Journal of Social Robotics), Selma Sabanovic (ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction) and Bilge Mutlu (Frontiers in Robotics and AI | Human-Robot Interaction). We talk about Open Access publishing and what the future of scientific publishing might look like. Besides the three dedicated journals, there are also some journals that encourage HRI topics without focusing completely on them. I talked with Kerstin Dautenhahn from the Interaction Studies journal and Ramanarayan Vasudevan from the IEEE Transactions on Robotics.
TranscriptThe transcript of the episode is available as a PDF. You can also follow the episode with subtitles through Descript.
HRI-Podcast-Episode-025-The-HRI-Journal-Publishing-Guide
Here is a table with all the key indicators for the journals. The full table is available online.
| Name | IEEE TRO | IJO Social Robotics | Interaction Studies | Frontiers in Robotics and AI HRI | ACM THRI | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | IEEE | Springer | John Benjamins | Frontiers | ACM | | Founded in | 1985 | 2009 | 2004 | 2018 | 2012 | | Acceptance rate | 20 | 36 | 48 | 67 | | Average papers are published per year | 183 | 113 | 22 | 22 | 52 | | Average number of revisions for accepted papers | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | | Average number of reviewers per submitted paper | 3 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | | Number of associate editors | 72 | 53 | 27 | 11 | 44 | | Average duration of peer review | 90 | 23 | 125 | 123 | 107 | | Peer review type | Single blind | Single blind | Single blind | Single blind | Single blind | | Average duration publishing process | 60 | 310 | 147 | 270 | | Listed in Scopus | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | Publications quartile in Scopus | not available | Q1 | Q1 | Q2 | not available | | CiteScore | 12.7 | 6.9 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 5.3 | | Listed on Web of Science | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | | Impact Factor | 7.8 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 5.1 | | Ppen access option | Yes (optional) | Yes (optional) | Yes (optional) | Yes (required) | Yes (required) | | Article Publication Fee | 2345 | 3690 | 1927 | 2125 | $0 required, $1300 optional | | Pre-publication allowed | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
ISSN 2703-4054Important Links:* Flaky Conferences and Journals in Human-Robot Interaction
Autonomous Vehicles (AV) are the riskiest form of human-robot interaction. One the one hand they offer unparalleled improvements to the safety and comfort of drivers, passengers and other traffic participants. They also promise to reduce emission. On the other hand, they demand new considerations for trust and responsibilities in human-robot interaction. The field of tension … Continue reading "Autonomous Vehicles – Do We Really Know The Risks?"
How can a robot act ethically?
If these are not enough publicity buzz words, then I do not know what is. In this episode we will look at the epic events around the Advances in Computer Entertainment (ACE 2018) conference and the associated Love And Sex With Robots Congress. The conferences had to be cancelled following a backlash from academics around the conferences’ organisation and in particular in response to the invitation of Steve Bannon as a keynote speaker to the ACE conference. I interviewed Adrian Cheok, David Levy and Yorim Chisik about the drama that unfolded last year. Adrian is now running for office in the Australian elections for the right wing Fraser Anning’s Conservative National Party.
ISSN 2703-4054 Important links: * The ACE2018 conference website (from the Internet Archive) * Statement by Yoram Chisik Regarding ACE 2018 * Love And Sex With Robots 2018 * Wired reported on the events * Adrian Cheok’s full CV * Omics Journals (Lovotics, Advances in Robotics & Automation) * Adrian Cheok is running in the Australian elections