In which Noah Smith & Brad DeLong wish Daron Acemoglu & Simon Johnson had written a very different book than their "Power & Progress" is...

Key Insights:

  • Acemoglu & Johnson should have written a very different book—one about how some technologies complement and others substitute for labor, and it is very important to maximize the first.

  • Neither Noah Smith nor Brad DeLong is at all comfortable with “power” as a category in economics other than as the ability to credibly threaten to commit violence or theft.

  • Acemoglu & Robinson’s Why Nations Fail is a truly great book. Power & Progress is not.

  • We should not confuse James Robinson with Simon Johnson

  • Billionaires running oligopolistic tech firms are not trustworthy stewards of the future of our economy.

  • The IBM 701 Defense Calculator of 1953 is rather cool.

  • The lurkers agree with Noah Smith in the DMs.

  • The power loom caused technological unemployment because the rest of the value chain—cotton growing, spinning, and garment-making—was rigid, hence the elasticity of demand for the transformation thread → cloth was low.

  • We need more examples of bad technologies than the cotton gin and the Roman Empire.

References:

@MITSloan’s Simon Johnson…” Twitter. October 9. https://twitter.com/BESI_Berkeley/status/1711541113738387874.

  • DeLong, J. Bradford. 2024. “What To Do About the Dependence of the Form Progress Takes on Power?: Quick Takes on Acemoglu & Johnson's "Power & Progress”. Grasping Reality. February 29.

  • DeLong, J. Bradford; & Noah Smith. 2023. “We Cannot Tell in Advance Which Technologies Are Labor-Augmenting & Which Are Labor-Replacing”. Hexapodia. XLIX, July 7.

  • Gruber, Jonathan, & Simon Johnson. 2019. Jump-Starting America: How Breakthrough Science Can Revive Economic Growth and the American Dream.

The book is available on the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/e-20190429.

+, of course:

Get full access to Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality at braddelong.substack.com/subscribe