This is the final episode of the AI for the Rest of Us series — and it didn't go the way Erin planned. Not because the series failed, but because it worked. She went in hoping to create a compassionate, curious space for women to engage with AI. She came out changed, uncertain, and more honest about what that process actually costs.
This episode is less a conclusion and more an unpacking: of the mental loop that comes with having a public opinion on something nobody agrees on, of changing your mind in real time, and of what it means to hold an evolving point of view without collapsing into certainty you don't have.
It's messy. That's kind of the point.
WHAT WE TALK ABOUT
Why the series was harder to make than anything Erin has produced in a long time — and why "just push through it" wasn't the right answer for this season of life.
The mental loop of researching your way to solid ground, getting challenged again almost immediately, and starting over. What that cycle costs when you care about being right, being good, being honest, and being liked — all at the same time.
What Erin actually thinks about the environmental cost of AI (spoiler: it's complicated, nuanced, and the 1-litre-per-query statistic is already outdated). Hank Green explains it better than anyone.
A new study on AI literacy and receptivity — and why becoming more informed about AI led Erin to use it less, not more.
Why directing AI anger at end users instead of industry leaders, politicians, and the people actually making decisions is misdirected — and why treating people differently based on whether they use AI is something Erin has zero tolerance for.
What it looked like to pursue AI literacy publicly while her own opinion was quietly changing. And why that's actually what critical thinking looks like from the inside, even when it doesn't feel like it.
"Your AI literacy will require you to hold an evolving opinion — you can't perform certainty and you also can't collapse into 'I don't know anything.' Hold yourself to a standard that is both messy and evolving."
ONE THING TO TAKE AWAY
You don't have to have a settled position on AI. You just have to stay in the conversation — curious, critical, and willing to let what you learn change how you think. That's harder than it sounds, and it's also the only honest option any of us has right now.
LINKS MENTIONED
Hank Green — How AI uses water (and what that actually means)
The clearest, most honest explainer on AI's environmental footprint Erin has found. Covers water consumption, the corn comparison, and why the conversation is more complicated than the headlines suggest.
Lower AI literacy predicts greater AI receptivity — Journal of Marketing (2025)
The study Erin references on the relationship between AI literacy and AI use. The more you know, the more critical you become. Worth reading — or at least the abstract.
WHAT'S COMING NEXT
Erin is returning to the conversations and topics that feel most like her — mental health, burnout, rest, and the real lives of women navigating all of it. More interviews. More check-ins with real people. Less performing certainty she doesn't have.
If this series resonated with you — even the messy parts, especially the messy parts — she'd love to hear from you.
FIND ERIN