On this episode of The Litigation War Room, Maxwell Goss speaks with Sara MacWilliams, a business litigator described by one judge as an “outstanding legal mind” who “refuted all the claims made [by her opponent] with assurance and aplomb.” Sara talks about an important recent case she handled that clarified and amplified the rights of corporate shareholders. Sara provides insights about shareholder litigation and successfully litigating unresolved questions of law.

01:59 – About Sarah MacWilliams and her law practice 05:11 – Murphy v. Inman 17:40 – The distinction between a derivative and direct claim 20:00 – Murphy v. Inman at the Michigan Supreme Court 27:13 – Cash-out mergers 28:59 – The current status of Murphy v. Inman 30:58 - Sarah’s advice for attorneys 32:45 – Where to find Sarah online

https://www.macwilliamslaw.com/staff (Sara MacWilliams’s Attorney Bio) https://www.courts.michigan.gov/49947a/siteassets/case-documents/uploads/opinions/final/sct/161454_73_01.pdf (Opinion of Justice Zahra in Murphy v. Inman)

https://www.thelitigationwarroom.com/ (Show Website) https://twitter.com/LitWarRoom (Twitter) https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-litigation-war-room-podcast/ (LinkedIn) https://www.facebook.com/The-Litigation-War-Room-Podcast-111235441143108 (Facebook)

See All 32 Episodes of "The Litigation War Room"