It well may be that the human being is designed in generalized principle with an inherently evolving curiosity of its creator thereby inducing us to give the concept of such divinity a name by which self and the other can refer to it as an agreement in common. It is to whom our individually anticipated hopes, prayers, gratitude is transmitted to be blessed upon us as longed-for solutions and/or continuing prosperity. Imaginably such communication can only be as a direct line to the eternal omniscient mind. Naturally, this does not require the switchboard of religion.

Neither must such a conceptuality communication’s proclivity between humans of a mind, of Universe’s eternal omniscient mind first invent a punitory episodic scenario for staging the ‘sin’ so that the violation, which was nonexistent prior to the human imagination’s invention of the interrelating human events could be condemned by the judgmental innovation. Likewise it was non existent before the concept ‘sin’ became the reason for the judge to play its part in the initial crime scene, which was not alluded to as a crime merely as an eternally punishable sin.

Biblically it is where the innovator of the storyline had some experience of human behavior as well as nature’s local environment where fruit trees grow. Where fruit trees grow, humans as well as foraging animals will pick the fruit if that is the local fruit grown in that region on Earth. That fruit picking occurs in the harvesting season specific to that region different from other weather and soil conditions elsewhere for the fruit tree to succeed.

Remember to read the entire transcript ON MY WEBSITE sagesynergeticage.com/ for relevant links provided therein for your researching in this education experiment, SEEEEC Synergetics Eligion Experiential Experimental Education Complex