After Brittney Wilson and I shared stories about times when we thought we were naive, JC Glick made an interesting point - does being naive mean you don't realize or consider there might be a different answer rather than just accepting a blatantly ridiculous answer because it is easier?
Chason Forehand added that being naive requires trust - the ability to believe someone. I countered that naive may actually not realizing that trust is a thing in a given situation.
This was an amazingly deep conversation and I think there is a lot of nuance there that is still to be uncovered.
What does being naive mean to you and how does it balance with trust?
Connect with the panelists: Brittany Wilson, M.Ed.: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brittany-m-wilson1031/ JC Glick: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jcglick/ Chason Forehand: https://www.linkedin.com/in/chason-forehand-rcf1222/ Dr Robyn Odegaard: https://www.linkedin.com/in/robynodegaard/
Want a summary of the Quick Hits I post every week, plus the links to the LinkedIn pages of each of the panelist to show up in your in-box every week? Just let me know where to send it: https://drrobynodegaard.com/quick-hits-notifications/