channel for May or may not be familiar to people outside of the U. K. I think that all TV content in the country's produced by the BBC theme Fish government has just announced, is about to sell it off privatizes probably to a huge conglomerate who will do what they want. Channel four's been around since theeighties and has been seen as a great success. Storey, for no other reason for putting for the different take on the world on trying to find his many different voices in the wilderness as possible. Does it make its own shows? And so independent production companies thrive under its umbrella? All this to say that could be about to change the issue at the core is that of public service broadcasting. It's a public service town. It's agendas to try to get at the truth of historian, not serve the agenda any minister who may or may not control his purse strings. Dear Keith. We make money from advertising, the minister for culture, Nadine Doris, last year said before committee and incorrectly said, We get our money from the public conference. We don't and the person in charge of this enormous decision doesn't understand us. It's deeply upsetting and, quite frankly, unsurprising from a government that seems to make decisions to cover his own ass in every situation. In this situation appears that we're getting some payback for how we've reported on Brexit on how we've reported on everything really were that loud voice in the back of the hall, heckling and shouting with Minister stand up to read. The press release is gospel, and now we're being disappeared. Dear Channel four. It's probably the worst time to lose an independent voice, and yet it seems the best time to get rid of an independent voice because there's so many of the things happening in the world that you might just disappear without anyone noticing. I really hope that isn't the case, but if you are subsumed into box or Disney, you'll soon be channelled for gotten

Check out the replies and reactions on Beams.fm