And then we see chatgpt plugins drop, which are basically ways of implementing entire businesses as plugins! This is what I said when Brockman dropped the web search plugin.
Did you just implement Google as a plugin?
— ᴅᴀɴɪᴇʟ ᴍɪᴇssʟᴇʀ (@DanielMiessler) March 23, 2023
Then you’ve got Midjourney, which is putting out some insane stuff, with a special focus on realism. I used it to make this image of Bernie Sanders as a DJ.
Deep socialist beats, and the hands are improving
Predictions are hard, especially about the future.
Anyway, things are nuts right now. But what I’m going to talk about in this piece isn’t GPT-4, or MidJourney, or how to make awesome prompts. What I’m going to talk about is what happens to tech and society as a result of all these technologies.
This is the tech I think will logically follow GPT-4 and ChatGPT Plug-ins, and how it will affect jobs, society, and basically the world. As we go through each one, think about which best suits you and which ones you’re going to play in. Let’s look at the first one.
This is already happening via ChatGPT Plugins.
SPQA is one likely architecture for this.
And the way you make your services available will be through such queries, i.e., asking normal human questions that hit your companies models via API
We (humans) become custom models and APIsFirst it’ll be companies, then it’ll be us.
Now that we can ingest the content of businesses, what comes next? Ingesting the content of people!
Both businesses and people have missions, goals, and KPIs.
Just as businesses have logs and Google Docs, we’ll upload all our journals, our blogs, every picture of us from birth, our Twitter feeds, our Instagram, our friend connections, etc.
But not just our past, also our mission in life, our goals, our preferences, our food likes and dislikes, our favorite celebrities, our favorite art, culture, and music, etc. Don’t worry, there will be interview services that talk to you for hours to extract all of this. It’ll be the SPQA model, just for people.
MidJourney’s interpretation of this article
Anyway, that last one is a distant use case. But it’s tied to the human desire to survive, so it’s as inevitable as moisturizer.
The more immediate uses will be instantiations of ourselves for self-exploration and to present as APIs for interaction with the APIs of others, e.g., exchanging preferences, mutual desires, shared goals, social lubrication, meet-ups at scale, synchronized social experiences, etc.
The next thing that happens—and again, this one is already starting as well—is we’ll create models that have one purpose: advocating on our behalf 24/7.
Another MJ interpretation
I used to think the assistant would be on the mobile device, but now with ChatGPT Plugins I wonder if this is just another plugin called from the device.
Written in 2016 the ideas are now starting to happen
I talked a bit about this in 2018.
MJ can’t seem to make 6 panes like I asked
In other words the quality of the control depends on everyone collectively being trained to use the watermarking system to validate things, which seems like a major assumption (see cookie popups for an example of how it could go wrong)
Knowledge work replacementOne of the oldest predictions about both AI and robots is that it would take jobs. Well, we f*cked around and now we’re about to find out.
GPT-4 and ChatGPT Plugins by themselves will crush millions of knowledge-worker jobs. And that’s without a global migration to something like an SPQA architecture that turns most work into natural language into questions and commands.
Don’t worry there’s much better news in the next section.
It’s going to be nasty. Really nasty. How many jobs will go away? Nobody knows, but it’s probably tens or hundreds of millions. McKinsey has one of the most cited papers on this and they said 15% of workers, or around 400 million people, back in 2017. But that was a very long time ago, and all these studies need to be redone post ChatGPT, let alone ChatGPT-connected-to-the-internet.
There are essentially three ways to be safe in this world.
So lots of people will still be needed, but not the bottom X percentage of creative/intellectual/techncial talent. What’s that percentage? I don’t know, and nobody else does either. But it’s not small.
Unsupervised Learning — Security, Tech, and AI in 10 minutes…Get a weekly breakdown of what's happening in security and tech—and why it matters.And here’s the bad news. As AI gets better it’ll come for those three categories as well. Radiologists are SMEs as well. And Oncologists. But pre-GPT AI is already better than them at many of their jobs.
MJ goes a bit darker
And at some point AI will be able to write its own plugins, and improve its core functionality. That will likely take a while though. And then you have the generalists, who ironically might last the longest. They’re the ones who need to figure out where all the problems are, and figure out the best tools to use.
This reminds me of the inverse order of AI job replacement we saw with laborers vs. creatives. We thought it would start with the blue collar types and come for artists last. Nope. It was the opposite. I think something similar could happen here with SMEs, AI Tech Creation, and Implementers.
What’s about to happen to knowledge workers is going to be bleak. And it’s going to happen so quickly. I used to think we were just screwed, but in the last several weeks I’ve had a new thought that is blowing me away.
Let me ask you this: what percentage of people are producing creative ideas that are being seen by others and that are good enough to earn them a living? Like, on the planet.
1%? .5%? .01% I don’t know the number, but it’s extraordinarily small. We’ve got 8 billion people now. How many startups are there? How much music is there? How many Hollywoods are there? How many Taylor Swifts? How many Kendrick Lamars? How many Elons? How many Satya Nadellas?
Too few. And here’s the important question. Why? Why so few?
Part of the answer is that talent matters, and intelligence matters, and creativity matters. Sure. Agreed. But how many people have similar capabilities to these people but don’t have the time or the tools to do anything with them?
Again, I don’t know the answer to that, but I’m betting it’s vast. Not hundreds of people. Not thousands. Millions.
Positive Disruption in the form of creativity
But they can’t go to a studio. They can’t talk to their producer friends and get a break. They don’t have an art table to work on. They don’t have a beat machine.
AI is about to change that. We’re about to remove many of the advantages that Steven Spielberg has over Takashi Noshimira, who lives in a small rural town in Japan, who is a creative genius. With these new models coming out, with the ability to create music, create video, create screenplays, create scripts, etc—we’re about to equalize the playing field massively.
In short, we’re about to multiply the creative output of planet Earth by hundreds of orders of magnitude.
We’re about to create new pop stars, new singer-songwriter stars, new top artists, new filmmakers, and even new genres of art. Do you realize how isolated and gatekeeping Hollywood is? I mean you basically have to go there to be successful. That rules out like 99.999% of the planet. Just off the top. Then you have to be beautiful and/or lucky and/or rich and/or connected. And wicked lucky on top.
Not anymore. Not with the AI that’s coming. With the AI that’s coming we’re going to have competitive marketplaces of anime, pop music, short stories, novels, porn, plays, scientific ideas—fucking everything. And AI will be used to discover, rate, and surface the content to the masses.
So yes, we’re about to have a knowledge-work implosion. But it’ll be followed by a creativity explosion.
Final thoughtsI hope you’ve enjoyed this, or at least that it got you thinking about things.
If you agree or disagree and want to discuss, feel free to reach out.
Notes1. I stayed away from AGI and superintelligence in this piece because it’s a topic of its own and it kind of breaks all realistic prediction possibilities anyway. Once it happens, if it happens, all bets are off.