Teams Governance Settings: Balance Collaboration and Risk###### Tom Papahronis
CIO Advisor
Microsoft Teams is an incredibly powerful tool that enables efficient collaboration and information access across an organization. That said, a remarkable number of customers that we work with struggle to manage and secure it the way that they would like to.
Much of the time, Teams was enabled during the pandemic to try to help employees work more effectively remotely, but it was deployed without much planning or training. As a result, Teams access is often over-permissioned while also being under-adopted and under-governed. Features like guest access and third-party app access are often unrestricted, and the usage of Teams and channels is inconsistent. Conversely, Teams loses a lot of value if it is over-restricted, so finding a balance that is right for your organization is critical.
Teams governance overall is a huge topic. Organizations need to establish some norms and policies regarding how Teams should be used, and there are hundreds of settings in the application. In this blog, I’ll address seven of the most common recommendations we give to customers to help them start getting Teams back on track. These settings will help to address common risks from Teams sprawl and overprovisioned access while allowing most of the collaboration features to be available to employees.
7 Most Common Recommendations Limit Who Can Create a TeamLimiting who can create a Team helps prevent Teams sprawl and allows those who are authorized to help ensure Teams and Channels are being used appropriately, and standards can be followed regarding Teams naming and ownership.
Restricting Team creation also restricts Office 365 group creation, so make sure to identify any other group creation workflows before applying this restriction. For more information, check out Manage who can create Microsoft 365 Groups. Create and Publish a Teams Naming StandardHaving a naming standard helps to set some organizational norms and makes it easier for employees to understand what to expect and how to interpret Team names.
Although limited, Microsoft provides a facility for automatically enforcing a naming standard based on either Entra ID attributes or user provided strings. Learn more here: Microsoft 365 Groups and Microsoft Teams naming policy.
In many cases, however, Microsoft’s Group Naming Policy is not as robust as one might want. If it is too limiting, the organization should still deploy a naming standard. Standard prefixes or suffixes can make it easier to determine the type of Team and its use. Create and Enforce a Standard Taxonomy for Teams and ChannelsEstablishing a standard taxonomy will help make Teams easier to navigate and encourage employees to use Teams and Channels in a similar way across business units and departments. Have a bias toward Channels. Only create a Team if a Channel in an existing Team won’t do the job. A Team is mostly just a group of Channels, so fewer Teams and more Channels is usually the right approach.
Public vs Private Teams: Most Teams are Private, meaning that members need to be invited by the owner, and the onus is on the owner to ensure that only the right staff (or guests) have access. Public Teams can be seen and joined by anyone in the organization, so they are good for employee engagement and other purposes where confidentiality is not a concern.
Here is a sample taxonomy that you can build on:
If any user is active in the Team (i.e., posts a message, accesses a file, etc.) the renewal cycle is restarted from the beginning. The owners of frequently used Teams will never see anything regarding expiration.
Expiration policies can be set globally or on a per Team basis. For more information, check out Microsoft 365 group expiration policy. Establish a Team Decommissioning or Archival ProcessFor Teams that have reached the end of their lifecycle, it is a good idea to have a process established to either archive or delete the Team. Often an organization will want to save documents related to a project, but not chat content or other transient information captured in Teams. This archival and deletion can be an administrative process, or you can allow the Team owner to archive a Team themselves.
Consider adding a Teams decommission or archival step to your project close-out process.
Archival renders the Team read-only but deleting does delete associated files. Often, organizations will archive files somewhere, but delete the Team. Learn more here: Archive or delete a team in Microsoft Teams. Restrict Third-Party Teams AppsTeams apps are a great way to extend the Teams client as the one-stop-shop for processes and information access, but it is important to vet the third-party (non-Microsoft) apps available in Teams before allowing their use. All Teams apps are available to users by default, so I often advise customers to restrict access to only the Microsoft apps, and then vet and publish the third-party apps as needed to either everyone or just the user groups that will use them.
Third-party apps and Microsoft apps can be enabled or disabled separately. Find out more here: Manage your apps in the Microsoft Teams admin center. Review and Update Teams Guest Access SettingsGuest access in Teams can be a bit complex, as guest capabilities are determined by the result of several policies working together across Entra ID, Microsoft 365 groups, SharePoint, and Teams. This combination gives you a lot of flexibility but can also introduce unintended consequences.
It is important to create a Teams guest access document that defines what guests are allowed (or not allowed) to do. That should be used as a guide to configure the various policies and settings to provide that level of access.
We Can Help!We help our clients with Teams Governance and Security all the time! Click Here if you’re interested in learning more about our Teams Governance Workshop. If you have questions or would like some help with Teams governance in general, please reach out to info@enablingtechcorp.com or complete the form below.
PrevPreviousSecuring What Really MattersNeed Assistance with Teams Governance?Contact our team today to schedule a call with one of our experts.
The post Teams Governance Settings: Balance Collaboration and Risk appeared first on eGroup Enabling Technologies.