5.2-Makkos Daf 04 A (10 lines Up)SummaryMishna: Rabbi Meir: Witnesses testified that A owes B two hundred _sus_ and they are found to be _zoimemim,_ they get malkos for giving false testimony ( _Lo sa’aneh_ ), and they also have to pay because of _ka’asher zamam_ . They receive two punishments because each is based on a different “name" .°Chachomim: If they have to pay, they cannot receive malkos. (The gemara asks that in general, the opposite is true - one who receives malkos doesn’t pay, see 5.?).(There is a general rule that we cannot give two punishments for one sin, this is the reasoning of the Chachomim. However Rabbi Meir holds that _hazamah_ is _knas_ and thus not limited by the laws of regular punishments; 3.1, 5.3).Mishna continues: Rabbi Meir: Witnesses testified that A ate _neveilah_ and deserves _malkos_ and they are found to be _zoimemim,_ they get _malkos_ twice for _Lo sa’aneh,_ and for _ka’asher zamam._Chachomim: They only receive _malkos_ once.° Rashi; Ordinarily we say that they only receive the more severe punishment, however since here there are two different _pesukim_ and thus two separate sins, they receive both punishments.Tosafos: _Lo sa’aneh_ is not connected with _hazamah,_ as such it remains an independent _lav_ and requires punishment. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.