22.4 Makkos Daf 14 B (16 lines Up)Today's learning sponsored by Moshe Horowitz In honor of the hardworking author of the summariesSponsor a day's learning (thousands of minutes!) for only $50 click here:https://www.flipcause.com/secure/cause_pdetails/ODUwOTU=According to Reish Lakish, the _azhara_ for an individual who consumed _kodesh_ while in a state of _tumah_ is from “She must not touch kodesh [nor enter the _mikdash_ ]”.Rabbi Yochanan argued; “Kodesh” in that _possuk_ refers to _terumah._SummaryChallenge: Does Reish Lakish derive the _lav_ prohibiting eating kodesh from the _possuk_ “She must not touch _kodesh_ ”? Doesn’t he learn the _lav_ prohibiting a _tamei_ from touching _kodesh_ from here?We Learned: If a _tamei_ touched _kodesh_Reish Lakish: He is liable for _malkos._Rabbi Yochanan: There is no _malkos_ penalty.Reish Lakish: He is liable for _malkos,_ as the verse states; “She must not touch _kodesh”._Rabbi Yochanan: There is no malkos penalty; that _possuk_ refers to _terumah._Resolution: The wording of the verse explicitly mentions touching, so that is our _azhara._However, the _possuk_ continues with the law prohibiting entry to the _mikdash_ which implies an act of _kareis._Touching _kodesh_ is not known to be an act of _kareis,_ only eating _kodesh,_ so the _hekesh_ teaches us the _lav_ prohibiting eating _kodesh._ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.