23.2 Makkos Daf 15 A (4 lines Dn)Sponsor a day's learning (thousands of minutes!) for only $50 click here:https://www.flipcause.com/secure/cause_pdetails/ODUwOTU=Rabbah bar bar Chanah quoted Rabbi Yochanan as enunciating a rule that a lav shekadmo eseh is not considered a _lav hanitak l’eseh_ and carries a malkos penalty.Rabbi Yochanan retracted.Rabbah proved this law from our mishna.SummaryQuestion: What caused Rabbi Yochanan to retract his opinion?Answer: It was contradicted by the law of Oneis._[The possuk states regarding an oneis “He must take her for his wife” (eseh) “He can never divorce her” (lav)]_Beraisa: If an _oneis_ was married and divorced. If he can remarry her, he must do so. If he’s a _kohen_ and cannot remarry her, he receives _malkos._Why does her husband not receive _malkos_ [in most cases]? While it seems to be a _lav hanitak l’eseh_ it is in fact a _lav shekadmo eseh_ .We see from here that a _lav shekadmo eseh_ is just like any other _lav hanitak l’eseh._Ulla: The _eseh_ here is superfluous because it can be learned from _motzi shem ra._ Since the sin of _oneis_ is more grievous than that of _motzi shem ra_ , we understand that the _eseh_ surely applies.Thus we use the principle of _im ein inyan_ to move the _eseh_ after the _lav_ and render it a _lav hanitak l’eseh._ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.