24.1 Makkos Daf 15 B (3 lines Dn)SummaryA learner in the presence of Rabbi Yochanan: In the case of a _lav hanitak l’eseh,_ if he fulfilled the _eseh_ as soon as he was warned by _beis din (kiymo),_ he is absolved from _malkos._ If however he ruined the opportunity to do the _eseh (bitlo),_ he receives _malkos._Rabbi Yochanan: What are you saying? (He saw that he was mixing together two extremes).Learn: _“Bitlo_ receives malkos, _lo bitlo_ is absolved from _malkos.”_Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish:_Kiymo,_ if he fulfilled the _eseh_ as soon as he was warned by _beis din,_ he is absolved from _malkos._ However in a case of _lo kiymo,_ he would receive _malkos._Question: What is this argument based on?Answer: It depends on the question of _hasra’as safek [a doubtful hasra’ah, that is when the eidim giving the hasra’ah cannot know whether a transgression will indeed take place]._Rabbi Yochanan: It is considered a valid hasra’ah. _[One can therefore be warned upon transgressing the lav and receive malkos a long time later upon ruining the opportunity to do the eseh]._Reish Lakish: It is not a valid hasra’ah. _[One can receive malkos for a lav hanitak l’eseh because the malkos is not dependent on the eseh]._____________________ _Listen to the recording with Tosfos for more clarity on this point._ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.