29.1 Makkos Daf 19 A (2 lines Up)Today’s learning sponsored bySponsor a day's learning (thousands of minutes!) For only 50 click here:https://www.flipcause.com/secure/cause_pdetails/ODUwOTUWe learned a beraisa (28.4) regarding the permissibility of eating _maaser sheini_ in Yerushalayim after the churban. In 28.6 it was explained that since the _zerikah_ of a _bechor_ requires a _mizbeach,_ we learn a _hekesh_ that eating the _bechor_ also requires a mizbeach.SummaryChallenge: A _(kodshim)_ law derived by _hekesh_ cannot be applied elsewhere by means of a _hekesh!_Resolution: _Maaser sheini_ is not kodshim so there are no limitations to what laws can be derived there.Challenge: That works only if we look at the learner _[maaser]_ which is not _kodshim._ But the teacher _[bechor]_ is _kodshim._Resolution: Actually the law is not derived from eating the _bechor_ which is derived from _zerikas hadam_ of the bechor. Rather the law of _maaser_ is derived from _bechor_ , by means of only one _hekesh._ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.