32.2 Makkos Daf 21 A (8 lines Up)Rav Ada bar Ahava: One should not put _eifer mikleh_ on a wound, because it gets inside the wound and looks like a tattoo.SummaryRav Bivi bar Abayye was particular not to put _eifer mikleh_ even on the wound of the bloodletter _[which is permanent, and obviously a bloodletting wound and not a tattoo] (they would go once a month to relieve blood pressure)._Rav Ashi: A wound is obvious. There are no grounds to forbid placing _eifer mikleh_ on a wound.Mishna:If a _nazir_ was drinking wine all day, there is only one liability [because _malkos_ depends on _hasra’ah_ and he received only one _hasra’ah]. (Regarding a korban chatas, brought by a shogeig, each “yediah” [knowledge of wrong] makes one liable for another korban, but here it is a case of a meizid, and he needs a hasra’ah in order to be punished by beis din)._If he was warned several times, _(even though he drank nonstop),_ he is liable for each _hasra’ah._If a _nazir_ was in contact with corpses all day, there is only one liability. If he was warned several times, he is liable for each _hasra’ah._If a _nazir_ was cutting his hair all day, there is only one liability. If he was warned several times, he is liable for each _hasra’ah._If somebody was wearing _shaatnez_ all day, there is only one liability. If he was warned several times, “Don’t wear, don’t wear” and he took it off and put it on again, he is liable for each _hasra’ah._ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.