2 Lovers of Wisdom Exploring the Nature of Reality and the Future of Humanity
lunchlogic@gmail.com Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
We discuss what causes accidents to occur and to what extent we can prevent them. We expand our conversation into what it is like to be in some of these accidents, and the lack of empathy as well as the indifference we sometimes have regarding people’s deaths and accidents. We also discuss if it is reasonable to blame an individual for every accident or whether it depends on their knowledge of the specific circumstances. We end off our conversation by discussing whether the innate impossibility of a Utopia without accidents is a curse and what we can do to change the reality we are living in.--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/messageSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
For the third time on Lunch Logic, we introduce new insights on helping the public engage with mathematics and other STEM subjects. We start by introducing the idea that emphasizes the importance of processing and understanding the information rather than merely “learning” it. We give examples of some of the coolest discoveries we’ve learned from our past math and science classes and reflect on how captivating they can be if taken properly. By trying to resolve this problem, we introduce the idea of bringing seminars into not just humanities courses but in STEM subjects as well since having to think and reflect on the meaning behind these discoveries is not only beneficial to appreciate our reality better but also enhances learning. We also talk about how important it is to come into the world as if you are awakened into the world and not accepting reality as it is and how this world can be viewed as a giant playground. To help the public engage with math and science, we introduce how we can combine those disciplines with their history and the impact they had on human civilization to help students understand better. We also talk about what causes the public to shy away from including math and science theories into the box of “common sense” and discuss how ironic it is that disciplines that indefinitely dictate our fundamental reality aren’t considered to be as important. We briefly mention the fear from the students behind new mathematical symbols and how they are caused simply due to the lack of knowledge within the subject and that one should lean more towards a state of excitement rather than a state of fear. We end our conversation with the limitations of the educational system and what we can do to help people with different abilities and interests as much as possible by connecting our topic to the overall educational system. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/messageSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
We dive deeper into the nature of superstition and question the why and how behind its existence. These questions include whether it works, why it exists, whether it will go away, and whether it should go away. We also try to understand the motivation behind them by understanding humanity’s nature to confront fear and impose control as well as how our lack of knowledge enhances the belief. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/messageSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
We start our episode by acknowledging how the term “laws” subconsciously affects us into thinking they are constructible and engineered entities such as governmental laws which shows how much role language and framing play in our thought processes. Then, we introduce a few thought experiments to demonstrate that the laws might arise from preventing these paradoxes from occurring rather than them being engineered. We dive even deeper into questioning why the Universe follows logic at all and what the world would look like if there were no laws governing the Universe. We go back to the question of how many laws are governing the Universe and whether they are even quantifiable. We also question if we can continue to ask “why” to every natural phenomenon and whether they would imply that there are an infinite number of laws. In addition, we question if the laws of the Universe are finite, research will ever stop and what life after Truth would be like. To understand the essence of the laws of nature better, we investigate how we come to understand mathematical and physical laws as well as the constants. We introduce a “blind mathematician” thought experiment and try to analyze whether it’s possible to intuitively understand mathematical or even physical concepts while having no observation or empirical data of the world. Furthermore, we question if the laws of physics, such as Maxwell’s equations, could be derived without experimentation and purely from mathematical concepts. We also question if there were to be two different sets of laws that are derivable/underivable with imagination and logic only, this would give distinction to the laws of mathematics and physics. Finally, we scrutinize the essence of mathematical and physical constants and whether it is possible to make physical constants dimensionless and more “fundamental” like mathematical constants. (ex. setting the permittivity of free space equal to 1 to make the mathematical value of electric flux equal to only the charge enclosed) We conclude that because the units are constructed, the “realness” in physics is focused on the proportion rather than the numbers and the exact values. We also explore how these mathematical and physical constants are related to each other and whether we can count the number of them. We end off by introducing a hypothesis such as a variable speed of light and what the social impact the change of fundamental constants would have and how we should address them if they ever occur.--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/messageSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
In our one year anniversary episode, we once again talk about one of our most mentioned and favorites topics: Math. We explore the properties of mathematics and why they make the subject so loveable. These properties include Truth, wisdom, beauty, perfection, logic, satisfaction, and objectivity. We also explore whether because of those same properties, they might cause hatred towards the subject and what we can do to spread the wonders and beauty of the world. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/messageSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
We discuss where social constructs come from and how we come to accept them. We analyze how certain illogical social constructs become barriers that restrict our freedom in our society and end up becoming detrimental to us. We also mention to what extent we should accept these norms that aren't necessary logical or serve any practical purpose but is purely for the sake of presenting ourselves to others. We end off our conversation by discussing how we can make the world look like a musical such as dancing in public and what truly is stopping us from increasing the society's happiness. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/messageSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
We discuss how to be a good and friendly alien by trying to analyze an alien civilization's rules of ethics and incorporating them in our policy. We bring up how regardless of their level of civilization, we must first change our way of treating animals on this planet before expanding our principles into the intergalactic space. We emphasize the importance of making partners in the Universe considering humanity's fate that has been lonely since its beginning and how important it is to understand and respect their rights to make ourselves companionable. We also discuss how we can present ourselves as non-threatening and friendly and whether we must even present ourselves that way in the first place. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/messageSupport this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
How do we start losing childhood innocence? Is it purely natural and if so is there anything we can learn from it? We talk about the nature of being a child and how similar we all were in the past. We also talk about the reality we live in where we have to live up to society's expectations and divisions/conflicts that occur while forgetting that we were all the same at one point.
--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
We talk about what problems the existence of an afterlife can solve as well as the burden that comes with the eternalness of afterlife. We also talk about what it means to say goodbye to our Earthmates forever and how love might arise from acknowledging all of our finite fate in the Universe. We briefly mention the similarities between graduation and death and humanity’s tendency to deny the existence of death. By looking at different options the world could’ve turned out regarding its existence and the existence of life, we mention how God might not have had a choice to build the “perfect world”. Finally, we emphasize the consequences of highlighting the finiteness of life and what that could bring to humanity.
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
ft. Jack Williams / We talk about the roles sports play in society and how they influence the public. We talk about whether sports can be seen as a distraction or if it’s an appropriate form of entertainment and is equivalent to other types of entertainment(i.e. movies). We also bring up the issue of idolizing professional athletes especially when it comes to young children and the consequences/boundaries of idolizing an individual in general. We end off our discussion by sharing our experiences as high school athletes and why the educational system over-emphasizes sports and the positive & negative effects of dedicating our time into playing sports.
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
We discuss the tools humans have invented that allow us to understand the Universe better and how they require previous knowledge of the Universe. We also relate the process to that of a video game. We talk about why the solutions of our questions in trying to understand reality is a lot like a puzzle that has elegant methods or solutions and whether they could perhaps be an evidence for the Universe trying to understand itself through conscious creatures. We share how our curiosity in trying to understand the Universe and the development of academic disciplines such as pure mathematics happen to be effective in describing different parts of nature and can become incredibly applicable.
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
We talk about the traits that Light, Mathematics, and God all have in common such as the philosophical question of their existence, similarities between “perfect” world of heaven and the platonic world, the incredible effectiveness mathematics and religion have in the physical world, the shared trait of omnipresence in Light and God, different manifestations of Light(wave and a particle) and God(the Holy Trinity in Christianity), and etc. We also debate whether these “God-like traits” must emerge simply due to how we subconsciously understand Mathematics and Light or whether there is a theological connection between them.
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
How does the physical stuff in our brain allow the emergence of the mind? Is consciousness predictable or is there a non-physical phenomena that doesn’t allow the predictability of consciousness? What causes our intuition in believing that something is scientific/unscientific? What does it mean for a theory to be scientific? Why does consciousness exist? Is it a mere inevitability due to the infinite time of our universe? Is the universe made for life? What is the relationship between language and consciousness? How do we perceive a better, more efficient language, and how can we develop it? Is the brain analogous to a computer? Are the parts of a digital computer such as a transistor fundamentally the same as a neuron of a brain?
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
ft. Sam Wasson / We share our experiences on religion and faith while elaborating on the positive and negative consequences of religion in society. We talk about what defines religion and whether cults or spirituality is fundamentally the same. We also talk about the danger of believing you are right and others are wrong while justifying your actions based on a divine being. We briefly mention Pacal’s wager and whether grasping on to religion before death without critical thinking makes us lose our integrity based on Truth. We end off with a discussion that encompasses mathematics and religion, such as the idea of faith, the platonic world/heaven that is governing the physical world, and whether our faith in logic and mathematics is any more reliable or “noble” than one in religion.
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
ft. Malena Price / We discuss the development and consequences of major breakthroughs in technology such as the invention of the internet and smartphone as well as the ethical problems that emerge. We dive deeper into the nature of helping for the sake of attention and whether it can be morally ignored as long as it brings the same positive consequences to society or whether the innate motivation of an individual matters. We also slightly touch the nature of click-baiting and attention seeking problems that occur as more accessible methods of communication spread throughout the internet. We end off our discussion with how to manage the “unofficial rules” people follow as technology develops and to what extent the people or the government should restrict the radical technological progress as well as how to “rebel” against these norms.
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
Is our way of expressing ideas in the language of mathematics fundamental in nature? How do logical truths that are derived from a set of axioms follow such elegant patterns? How are physical quantities that seem different become analogous at the fundamental part of nature?(i.e. mass and length of the pendulum; spring constant and gravitational acceleration) Do these equations have to emerge due to them being the only way possible to describe certain phenomena in nature? How is translating our ideas in the language of mathematics analogous to the nature of computer programming?
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
ft. Jason Resch, the creator of AlwaysAsking.com / Why is there something rather than nothing? Why not nothing? Today, we discuss the most obvious and perhaps the most mysterious question that humanity can pose. We first start off by defining what “nothing” is and whether it’s achievable by any means. By hypothesizing the possibility of something emerging out of nothing and the existence of self-existing things, we attempt to analyze the essence of candidates for self-existence such as logic, truth, numbers, possibility, the universe, a higher plane, and consciousness. We briefly talk about the idea of faith and the connection between religion and science. We also explore the three modes of existence(Math, Matter, Mind), their relations, and which one of them is the most fundamental. We, then, discuss whether reality could be replicated using information and computation and what role they play in shaping the structures of a universe. Finally, we end our conversation by discussing the social consequences of finding out the answer to the question and how we can popularize the trait of always asking across the public.
--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
ft. Mr. Brian Stukey / We discuss the characteristics of successful physics students at different difficulty levels. We also discuss the current philosophy of education in physics and how we can improve it in the future. By analyzing the most fundamental ideas, we question the extent of the "realness" in physics. Such questions include whether ideas that were derived from the more "fundamental ideas" are equally valid expressions of reality and whether abstract ideas like "instantaneous velocity" are real.
--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
ft. Ben Rosenfield / Does Infinity exist in the physical world? If not, why does it exist mathematically? Are there different levels to Infinity? What are the similarities and differences between Infinity, Zero, and negative Infinity? We run through a number of thought experiments to explore the nature of Infinity in both the physical world and the mathematical world.
--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
We discuss how we can approach the questions of why the laws of nature have to be the way they are by analyzing the essence of empirical and logical truths. We also discuss whether the constants and patterns that seem random to our eyes must emerge simply due to their inevitability. By trying to analyze the essence of “brute facts”, we approach whether the obvious truths that have to be true in our world could’ve been different such as the Taylor series for trigonometric functions that dictate the fundamental structure of physical objects. We question if our intuition in believing that those brute facts have to be trivial and undeniable is wrong because our thoughts were programmed to think of thoughts that are only logically possible in our Universe.(ex: how we can’t imagine a circle where its value of pi is not approximately 3.14) We also question whether logic, in its fundamental essence, contains the traits of order and elegance or if the Creator designed the Universe that allowed the emergence of ordered and elegant patterns that must subsequently emerge due to his logical system. Finally, we discuss whether the “laws” of the Universe have to exist, if there’s only one way for the Universe to be true, or if those laws could’ve been different(and if so, whether they would’ve still contained the traits of order and elegance.)--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
ft. Anderson Corum / Is Time a man-made concept or does it exist independently? Can an object move with an imaginary velocity or experience time greater than what the Universe allows? Is "here" analogous to "now"? Does time stop one from keeping their personal identity?
--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
Would a perfect world be better than our current one? Is there an objectivity in beauty and aesthetics? Is diversity and individuality potentially more important than absolute unity? What are Laws for?
--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
Do you love chicken? What are animals to us? What are we to animals? Are we evil because of how we treat animals, or do we simply not have a choice? Are we God to animals, and if so, how does our tangibility differ how we view a god to how they view us? How should we treat animals?--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
Are humans naturally inclined to get used things? We have so much access to incredible tools and ideas and information in our everyday lives that it’s difficult to appreciate it. As kids we’re curious about everything around us, but that amazement wavers as we age. Can philosophy help us return from adaptation to fascination? --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
FACE REVEAL. In our first video episode, we continue our discussion from Episode #53(The Social Consequences of Determinism) and explore the idea of failing/achieving the Universal Purpose. We then explore the relationship between determinism and the Theory of Everything. We cap off the episode by discussing our theories on the future of society.--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
Can we interpret the most fundamental laws of mathematics and science linguistically? Could the societal laws and ethics be absolute? Can we disagree with absolute morality?
--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
In this episode we explore the effects that believing your life is predetermined can bring on the society and individuals. We also explore the duality of sense of freedom and restriction that comes with this mindset. Listener Support Link: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lunchlogic/support
I’m this episode we explore the nature of conspiracy theories and how society should handle them. We also talk about what role passion should play in argument and civil discourse, and how everyone should have a healthy amount of skepticism to their skepticism.
Is the meaning of life for humans different from that of other living things? Why do we feel the desire for purpose? We talk about how we can find meaning by observing other species.
Is information the most fundamental building block of the physical world? How do physical objects emerge from abstract information? Are they the same? Could the Universe be a literal computer?
Can you give value to the existence of the Universe itself? Is it even a valid question to give an ethical meaning to the existence of a thing?
Is a bad life worth more than the absence of life? Does life have inherent value? In this episode we explore whether our existence is a gift or a curse.
ft. Ian Pahuja / What does it mean to be real? Are negative numbers real? imaginary numbers? zero? Infinity? What about the tools and applications of mathematics?
Can we bear the consequences of Truth? What is this all for? How do we continue our lives after knowing everything? Is it even possible?
We get absolutely nowhere while contemplating whether math is based on the physical world or vice versa. (Luke gets a brain cramp)
We talk about how to approach metaphysical questions that often seem beyond our understanding.
We discuss the fundamental essence of curiosity, the elegant patterns in nature, and why the Universe works the way it does.
ft. John Abraham / We continue to explore the essence of math with a guest with different beliefs.
ft. Dr. Thad Wilhelm / We discuss the importance of mathematics in education, the attitude/mindset that’s necessary to become a student of math, and the essence of mathematics.
We talk about the impact an AI will have on the economy, technology, human’s innate abilities that are irreplaceable by AIs, and ethical issues that may occur.
ft. Lily Schafer / How many laws are governing the Universe? Is it finite or infinite? Why? How?
ft. Lily Schafer / We discuss the problems with how mathematics is taught, the public’s point of view, and the educational system in general.
ft. Lily Schafer / What is a coincidence? Could there be an underlying connection? Is science perfect?
We talk about logical paradoxes and logic/math’s ability to connect our minds to the Universe.
We talk about the social, economic, and scientific impacts on human civilization after the discovery of aliens.
We discuss the wonders of language, the perfect language, and how technology could get us there.
We explore the correlation between intelligence and consciousness and an additional correlation to introversion.
We talk about conformity in private and public settings and how to improve our educational system.
We talk about why humans cling onto superstitions and the possible connection to boredom
We talk about what makes things cute and whether they’re determined by society or biology.
We talk about if potential energy is real or if humans just use it as a way to understand physics.
In this episode we talk about what makes scary things scary and a possible connection to humor.
In this episode we discuss if life in isolation can be meaningful and what meaning really is.
In this episode we seek to question the morality of the creator and if morality was defined by him
We talk about why certain quantities are scalars and some are vectors and what would happen if it was different.
In this episode we talk about why society puts so much value on sports and if it’s justified.
We start off questioning if absolute morality is real, but eventually it devolves into questioning the beginning
We talk about whether love is felt because of evolutionary biology or something more grand.
we talk about the importance of truth and what the point of life is after everything has been discovered(BTW I CHANGE LUKE’S MIND 🤯)