Last week Beth and I made the case for building your training plan around recovery rather than volume. Not everyone was convinced and that's exactly what we were hoping for.
This week we’re back to work through the most common challenges and questions that came in. From why the pros train 30 hours a week to whether recovery-centred training is just an excuse to be lazy, this episode tackles the pushback head on and gives honest, practical answers to the questions every serious endurance athlete will recognise.
If you haven't listened to last week's episode yet, it's worth doing that first. The link is in the show notes.
5 KEY POINTS
3 TAKEAWAYS
KILLER QUOTE
"How much training can you actually recover from, and how much can you consistently complete? If you can answer that honestly, without any part of your ego being involved, you'll probably get to the right answer."
LINKS & RESOURCES
Mentioned in the episode:
Previous episode — Train Less, Recover More
Sue Reynolds episode — What Would Happen If an Age-Group Triathlete Trained Like an Olympian?:
WHOOP Project PR Study
Tim Gabbett research — The training—injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder?
https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/50/5/273
Want a training structure built around what you can actually recover from rather than a generic plan? That is exactly what SWAT is designed for.
CLICK HERE TO START YOUR MISSION
FREE Download👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
A simple checklist to see if you’re actually on track 3–6 months out.
Ironman Sanity Checklist
Connect with me HERE:
https://linktr.ee/simonward
You can find links for the following channels - Website, Facebook, podcast, Instagram, YouTube
Email: Simon@thetriathloncoach.com
Sign up for Simon’s weekly newsletter
Got an awkward question for Simon? Send it to beth@thetriathloncoach.com and you might just hear it on a future episode!