John Stossel, Dinesh D’Souza, Ben Shapiro, Michael Knowles, Andrew Klavan PAY FOR YOUR OWN CHOICES: Andrew Klavan 100% SHREDS socialist redistribution.John Stossel- More Free Stuff 2020Everything on DemandSecond Chance DENIEDHot Air on the HillDINESH D'SOUZA ROASTS AOC: Her socialism is more like Venezuela than ScandinaviaFROM NEW YORK TO NORTHAM: Knowles hits the Left over barbaric abortion policies Michael Knowles TEARS INTO the Left over their racism & bigotryWatch Elizabeth Warren Lie About Her Son's Private School EducationGENESIS V. DARWIN: Shapiro sets the record straight about the creation of manALL CONFLICT IS THEOLOGICAL: Knowles proves that faith is what informs Dinesh D'Souza CALLS OUT illegal aliens for cutting the line he had to wait in  PAY FOR YOUR OWN CHOICES: Andrew Klavan 100% SHREDS socialist redistribution.  More Free Stuff 2020Watch this video at- https://youtu.be/_I_glE1X10w John StosselLast year, we added up all the candidates' spending plans. Since then, they've proposed so much additional spending that we had to do a new videoWe break the spending plans into four categories: Education, Welfare, Environment, and... a “Grab-bag” section. First, Education: Joe Biden wants free community college, to cut student debt in half, to increase Pell Grants, “modernize" schools, create government-funded pre-K, and hire school psychologists. In total, Biden would increase spending by $157 billion every year. Yet he's the "moderate"! Compared to most others, he is. Pete Buttigieg would spend $178 billion a year on similar programs. His plan is nothing compared to Elizabeth Warren's. She'd eliminate nearly all student debt, impose universal childcare, and quadruple spending for low-income schools. $277 billion. Bernie Sanders would eliminate ALL student debt, even for the rich. That alone would cost $220 billion a year. Add in $60 billion for free childcare and pre-k, and $15 billion for black colleges, Sanders’ wants to increase education spending by $295 billion. That’s just education. In total, two candidates want to increase spending by several TRILLION dollars! Who’s the worst? Who is least bad? For the other rounds, and to see the final winner, see the video above. ! -------- Don't miss a single video from Stossel TV, sign up here: https://johnstossel.activehosted.com/f/1 ---------  Everything on Demandhttps://youtu.be/kIvoWK_GVGQ John StosselCompetition makes entertainment better and cheaper. -------- Don't miss a single video from Stossel TV, sign up here: https://johnstossel.activehosted.com/f/1 --------- “Reporters always complain about business. We rarely cover good things businesses do -- the constant improvements that happen slowly,” says John Stossel. Fortunately, a new video essay by Sean Malone of the Foundation for Economic Education does exactly that. He shows the limited options for entertainment we had during his childhood and how “now just about anything I've ever wanted to watch is available at the click of a button.” Why did this happen? “The astounding wealth of home entertainment options we have today are the result of entrepreneurial start-ups.” The video explains that 20 years ago, “Blockbuster dominate[d] the rental video space... but tack[ed] on substantial fees for returning movies late ... $40 in late fees at Blockbuster annoyed Reed Hastings enough to start a new subscription-based company built around mail-order movie rentals with no late fees, called Netflix.” By 2005, the video notes, Blockbuster had lost 75% of its market share. Stossel says, “There is an economics lesson in that. When entrepreneurs face competition, they may lose, but the fight makes life better for almost all of us. Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter explained how that works.” “He introduced the term "Creative Destruction" as a defining feature of free market economies … older companies like Blockbuster have to become more innovative themselves or be destroyed by their competition. This process is how our stand