Diagnosing Health Care Podcast: Recent Episodes
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Today’s health care industry is a high-stakes environment full of legal, policy, and regulatory-related obstacles. There are also tremendous opportunities, and in order to thrive, it is critical for executives, general counsel, and administrators to have a consistent pulse on trends and available business solutions. Subscribe to our health care podcast, Diagnosing Health Care, for thought-provoking, strategic insights from Epstein Becker Green attorneys and health care professionals.
What health care and life sciences organizations need to know:
- "Bulk" Has a New Definition: The volume thresholds under the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ's) Bulk Sensitive Data (BSD) Transfer Rule are surprisingly low—sharing genomic data on just 100 people can trigger compliance requirements, catching many organizations off guard.
- HIPAA Compliance Is Not Enough: The BSD Transfer Rule creates an entirely new compliance layer that goes beyond existing privacy frameworks, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), applying even when data has been de-identified or anonymized.
- It's About Access, Not Just Transfers: Simply giving a foreign vendor, board member, or investor the ability to view sensitive data can trigger the BSD Transfer Rule—no formal data-sharing agreement is required.
In this episode of Diagnosing Health Care®, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Laura DePonio, Elizabeth McEvoy, and Elena Quattrone walk health care and life sciences organizations through the DOJ's BSD Transfer Rule—from scoping and compliance to enforcement risks and exemptions.
Navigate BSD Transfer Rule Compliance with Confidence:
Our team has developed specific tools and advisory services to help organizations like yours understand their obligations under the BSD Transfer Rule, assess risk, and implement compliant data practices. Check out our free resource center: https://explore.ebglaw.com/resources/doj-bulk-sensitive-data-transfer-rule/
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc93.
Listen to the series and subscribe for email notifications: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
-
Epstein Becker Green is a national law firm that focuses its resources on health care, life sciences, and workforce management solutions, coupled with powerful litigation strategies. This video is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE® is a registered trademark of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
© Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Value-based enterprises depend on timely, accurate data, yet the rules that govern how that data moves between the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), accountable care organizations, payors, and providers remain complex and often inconsistent.
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Kevin Malone and Karen Mandelbaum unpack the regulatory frameworks shaping data exchange in value-based care. They outline how federal privacy laws, CMS rules, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and state requirements intersect; why CMS-sourced data operates under a different regime than Medicare Advantage; and where organizations face the biggest operational hurdles when using, sharing, and governing data across large networks.
Key Takeaways:
- Distinct Legal Frameworks: CMS data is controlled by the Privacy Act, while Medicare Advantage data falls under HIPAA.
- Disclosure Tracking Requirements: CMS data use agreements demand strict tracking and downstream compliance.
- Operational Data Challenges: Silos and uneven data quality remain major barriers to effective value-based care.
Tune in to learn how today's rules shape data access, data quality, and the real-world mechanics of value-based care.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc92
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
-
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
By early 2026, substance use disorder (SUD) providers, health plans, clinicians, health information exchanges (HIEs), and vendors must meet new federal privacy standards for SUD treatment records or face Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-level enforcement and penalties.
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Lisa Pierce Reisz, David Shillcutt, and Laura DePonio join Nichole Sweeney, General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer at CRISP, to break down the 42 CFR Part 2 final rule: what's changing, what's staying the same, and what organizations often miss. The group explains how the final rule aligns with (but does not replace) HIPAA, why patient consent remains central, and what new operational risks are emerging.
Key Takeaways:
- Adoption of HIPAA Penalties: Part 2 now adopts HIPAA's enforcement and penalty structure.
- Operational Readiness Challenges: Operational readiness, not technology, is the biggest challenge.
- Expanded Compliance Duties: Payors and HIEs face major shifts in data access and compliance duties.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc91.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
-
Epstein Becker Green is a national law firm that focuses its resources on health care, life sciences, and workforce management solutions, coupled with powerful litigation strategies.
This video is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE® is a registered trademark of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
© Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Why is now the moment for women's health?
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Rachel Snyder Good, Beth Scarola, and Laura DePonio sit down with Sheila Biggs, Vice President of Jarrard, to explore how women's health is evolving from a niche focus into a mainstream industry priority. They discuss the forces accelerating growth, the opportunities for change, and the challenges that still need to be addressed across outcomes, access, and patient experience.
This episode unpacks several key topics, including:
- what "women's health" really means today—far beyond fertility and reproductive care;
- how decades of underinvestment created new opportunities for innovation, equity, and growth;
- why investors and policymakers are turning their attention to this space, and what's driving the momentum;
- the biggest gaps still to close in outcomes, access, and patient experience;
- how storytelling and strategy can help reshape the public narrative around women's health; and
- where the industry is headed next—including insights related to the upcoming Women's Health Innovation Summit.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc90.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Can food really be the prescription for better health? Discover how the “Food as Medicine” movement is reshaping health care and what it means for patients, providers, and the future of wellness.
On this episode, special guests Noah Voreades of OLIPOP and Ivan Wasserman of Amin Wasserman Gurnani join Epstein Becker Green attorneys Jessika Tuazon and Ada Peters to explore how food is being integrated into health care to prevent and manage chronic diseases.
The episode unpacks the policy priorities of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the challenges of scaling food-based interventions, and the role of industry and government in driving innovation. Learn about the future of food as a clinical tool, the evolving regulatory landscape, and actionable takeaways for stakeholders navigating this transformative space.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc89.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Important changes are unfolding in the vaccine space. How have vaccine exemptions posed a significant risk to populations across the country? What are the long-lasting effects of the new administration's federal health agency funding cuts?
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Richard Hughes, Spreeha Choudhury, and Will Walters, as well as Anna Larson of EBG Advisors, discuss vaccine-related topics ranging from the measles outbreak and the reduction of the federal workforce to decreased government funding of public health programs.
If you are interested in getting access to Epstein Becker Green’s publicly available shared information, please use the following link to subscribe: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc88.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
From removing diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives to suspending foreign aid and canceling federal funding, it is clear that the current administration is drastically changing the landscape of government-funded research as we know it. What should research institutions be doing now to best prepare themselves for what's to come?
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Marylana Saadeh Helou, Emily Chi Fogler, and Elizabeth McEvoy discuss how recent executive actions are impacting federally funded research at ambulatory medical centers, hospitals, universities, and other institutions, as well as how these actions may impact existing or future grants from the government.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc87.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Since Pam Bondi was appointed U.S. Attorney General, we’ve seen notable shifts in the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) criminal enforcement priorities. How significant are some of these changes, and how might they affect your health care organization as we progress through 2025 and beyond?
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Sarah Hall, Melissa Jampol, Thomas Jaworski, and Richard Westling discuss what to expect from criminal health care fraud enforcement under Attorney General Bondi’s leadership and how it may impact the health care industry.
If you are interested in getting access to Epstein Becker Green’s publicly available shared information, please use the following link to subscribe: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc86.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
It is critical for health care and life sciences businesses to understand what might and might not change during this transitionary period. How can you advocate for your needs and priorities in a time of such uncertainty?
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green (EBG) attorneys James Boiani, Rachel Snyder Good, Marjorie Scher, and Rob Wanerman discuss the proposed leadership of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the second Trump administration and the top-ticket items for these potential new leaders.
Chevron deference article mentioned in today’s show
This podcast was recorded on January 23, 2025. Since then, EBG has put out several important free resources in response to President Trump's executive orders and other executive actions to make sure EBG subscribers have the information they need to navigate any uncertainty. Some examples include:
DEI and Affirmative Action Programs Blitzed, While Executive Order 11246 Is Revoked
Navigating Executive Orders: Insights and What Lies Ahead
The Trump Administration’s Immigration Enforcement Policy: What Hospitals and Health Care Providers Must Know for Their Patients, Staff, and Visitors
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc85.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The recent 2024 elections resulted in a new Trump administration and a Republican-controlled House and Senate. From policymakers to stakeholders across the industry, everyone is wondering what health policy will look like in 2025 and beyond.
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Ted Kennedy Jr., Leslie Norwalk, Philo Hall, and Alexis Boaz discuss the results of the 2024 elections and their impact on the health policy space. What will a second Trump administration look like? How might the election results affect the health care policies addressed during Congress’s 2024 lame-duck session?
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc84.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
One year ago, on October 30, 2023, President Joe Biden signed an executive order laying the groundwork both for how federal agencies should responsibly incorporate artificial intelligence (AI) within their workflows and how each agency should regulate the use of AI in the industries it oversees. What has happened in the past year, and how might things change in the next?
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Lynn Shapiro Snyder, Eleanor Chung, and Rachel Snyder Good reflect on what is new in health care AI as a result of the 2023 executive order and discuss what industry stakeholders should be doing to comply and prepare for future federal regulation of AI in health care.
Article – HTI-1 final rule: https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/oncs-information-blocking-enhancements-under-the-hti-1-rule-are-in-effect
Article – HTI-2 proposed rule: https://www.healthlawadvisor.com/as-the-window-for-comments-closes-on-onc-astps-hti-2-proposed-rule-whats-in-hti-2-and-what-does-it-mean-for-you
Webinar – New Final Regulation Prohibiting Algorithmic Discrimination by Health Care Providers and Payers: https://www.ebglaw.com/insights/events/new-final-regulation-prohibiting-algorithmic-discrimination-by-health-care-providers-and-payers
Webinar – Demystifying AI Tools in Health Care, An Introduction for Federal Policymakers: https://www.ebglaw.com/insights/events/alliance-for-health-policy-demystifying-ai-tools-in-health-care-an-introduction-for-federal-policymakers
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc83.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Workplace violence in health care settings is on the rise, capturing the attention of both state and federal lawmakers. As awareness grows, so too does legal scrutiny and the push for new regulations and enforcement. In these seemingly critical times, what should health care employers be thinking about and incorporating into their comprehensive strategies to prevent and address workplace violence?
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Sharon Peters, Eric Neiman, and Avery Schumacher dissect the legal landscape surrounding health care workplace violence, examining the steps being taken at various levels of government and what they mean for health care providers and institutions. Join us as we explore the legal frameworks, emerging policies, and broader compliance implications for health care employers.
Check out our complimentary 50-state survey on workplace violence laws in health care.
Access the Hospital Association of Oregon’s workplace violence prevention toolkit.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc82
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The game has changed—are you positioned to adapt? Over the past 12 months, the federal government has been heavily regulating private investment in health care entities. Simultaneously, multiple states have enacted or introduced new laws restricting or requiring approval of such investments. The question arises: What do you do if you already have investments in these health care entities?
On this episode, Leslie Norwalk, Strategic Counsel at Epstein Becker Green (EBG), joins EBG attorneys Josh Freemire, Tim Murphy, and Ted Kennedy, Jr., to discuss how health care entities, investors, and board members should be responding to an evolving political and regulatory environment that has increased the scrutiny of private investment in health care entities.
Letter to Joint Agency RFI on Consolidation in Health Care Markets: https://www.ebgadvisors.com/insights/publications/leslie-norwalk-responds-to-joint-agency-rfi-on-consolidation-in-health-care-markets
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc81.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Knock, knock! If the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is already at your door, it may be too late. Enforcement is on the rise, and the microscope is fixed on controlled substances. What can industry stakeholders do to prevent penalties and protect themselves from DEA scrutiny?
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Melissa Jampol, David Johnston, and Avery Schumacher discuss recent and pending updates to DEA rules and guidance, outline steps stakeholders can take to prepare for an inspection, and share tips on what to do when the DEA arrives.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc80
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Laboratories in the United States are facing a major regulatory landscape shift. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has finalized a new rule ending its historical blanket enforcement discretion over laboratory developed tests (LDTs). What does this mean for labs going forward?
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys James Boiani, Rob Wanerman, and Megan Robertson lay out the new landscape, analyze existing and potential challenges, and identify key developments to watch for as this new regulatory era unfolds.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc79
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
In a recent landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the Chevron doctrine in the case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. This ruling has significant implications for employers and other entities in the health care and life sciences industries, as it changes the way courts are likely to interpret and apply regulations issued by federal agencies.
On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys George Breen, Stuart Gerson, Rob Wanerman, and Paul DeCamp analyze the fallout of this monumental decision, discuss what it means for entities seeking to challenge ambiguous statutes and regulations, and assess how to proceed from here.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc78
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Will the reclassification of marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug disrupt the cannabis marketplace? What consequences must industry stakeholders consider if the Drug Enforcement Administration's proposal becomes a reality?
On this episode, special guests Anthony Minniti, a New Jersey-licensed pharmacist, and Stacey Udell, an accountant with expertise in representing cannabis operators across the United States, join Epstein Becker Green attorney Lisa Gora to discuss the regulatory domino effect and tax implications related to this major potential change to the cannabis industry.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc77
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Gender-affirming care has become the latest flashpoint in state legislatures and state and federal courts across the nation. States are divided, with some passing laws that seek to restrict access to gender-affirming care and others aiming to protect access. What is gender-affirming care? What risks does it pose to providers and patients? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Jenny Nelson Carney, Lisa Pierce Reisz, and Erin Sutton dissect gender-affirming care: what it is, what it isn't, and what is at stake for everyone involved.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc76
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
After nearly two years of combined efforts from the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, the agencies jointly issued much-anticipated merger guidelines identifying the procedures and enforcement practices they will apply for evaluating potential mergers. What might these changes mean for hospitals, health systems, and other stakeholders in the health care industry? On this episode, we discuss some of the key changes in the finalized antitrust merger guidelines and what these guidelines mean for the agencies' approach to enforcement.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc75
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Under the Biden administration, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services published a health equity framework that drastically changed the playing field for health plans and other risk-bearing entities. In the wake of these changes, how can health plans, accountable care organizations, and other similar stakeholders successfully create and administer social determinants of health interventions as a means to advance health equity? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Jackie Selby, Kevin Malone, and Marjorie Scher discuss the recent national focus on health equity, the actionable interventions behind the concept, and the responsibility of stakeholders in making care delivery more equitable.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc74
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
What trends in state laws and regulations have emerged in the post-public health emergency (PHE) era, and how do these changes impact telehealth stakeholders? At the federal level, many telehealth-related flexibilities have been extended through December 31, 2024, whereas, at the state level, there are wide variations in approach. Many states have continued to push the boundaries of existing telehealth policies, yet no two states are exactly alike in their approach to defining and regulating telehealth. On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Amy Lerman, Audrey Davis, and Avery Schumacher discuss emerging trends in state laws and regulations post-PHE as well as federal regulatory and enforcement developments that set the stage for states.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc73
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
From wholesale revisions of the merger guidelines to significant amendments to the Hart-Scott-Rodino premerger notification forms, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have proposed significant changes that, if adopted, will have profound effects on merger review and enforcement for the foreseeable future. What might these changes mean for hospitals, health systems, and other stakeholders in the health care industry? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Trish Wagner, John Steren, Jeremy Morris, and Will Walters dive into the latest developments in health care antitrust law and analyze the FTC’s and DOJ’s views on mergers in health care markets.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc72
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) broad definition of “misbranding” has created some industry confusion, while the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC’s) updates to its health products compliance guidance have done the same. In light of these recent actions, what challenges are dietary supplement manufacturers now facing? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Jack Wenik, Teddy McCormick, Zach Taylor, and Tracey Gonzalez discuss recent updates to the FDA and FTC guidelines as they apply to dietary supplement manufacturers, as well as new developments with respect to misbranding.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc71
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Throughout this series, we've talked about the growth of the direct access testing industry and the types of models developed to support the businesses that are using that type of testing. We've covered reimbursement considerations and physician ordering and specimen collection regulations. How does all of this come together to shape the future of the lab testing industry? On the final episode of our four-part series on direct access laboratory testing, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Bob Hearn, James Boiani, and Megan Robertson discuss licensing and operational considerations, as well as where the lab testing industry is headed.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc70
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The impacts of climate volatility, cybersecurity threats, artificial intelligence, and building information modeling and construction technology have increased pressure on major construction projects on top of labor availability and supply chain adversity. If your approach to delivering construction is the same as it was in early 2020, you're probably inviting more risk to your project than you want.
On this episode of our Owner's Outlook series, special guest Alanna Klein, Product Director of Construction and Energy at Liberty Mutual, and Epstein Becker Green construction attorney Chris Dunn discuss what owners, developers, and industry participants can do to avoid or at least manage these risks.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc69
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
In July, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services made significant headway in its implementation of the drug pricing provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). How can stakeholders respond to, implement, and comply with all these new provisions? On this episode, hear from special guest Sylvia Yu, Vice President and Senior Counsel of Federal Programs at PhRMA.
Sylvia and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Connie Wilkinson and Alexis Boaz discuss the recent updates on the quickly moving implementation of the drug pricing provisions under the IRA and the industry's response.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc68.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization one year ago overturned 50 years of legal precedent protecting the constitutional right to abortion in the United States, leaving the question of whether and how to regulate abortion to individual states. What has happened since and what is to come? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Amy Dow, Erin Sutton, and Jessika Tuazon examine how the Dobbs decision has impacted the legal landscape for patient access to abortion, discuss the challenges facing the health care industry, and explore how industries can manage their compliance efforts moving forward as the legal landscape continues to evolve.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc67.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Like the diversity of the industry itself, merger and acquisition (M&A) transactions in health care take many forms, varying in size and complexity. While buyers tend to focus on several things as part of those transactions, securing key employees post-closing is an important but sometimes overlooked issue. What are some important factors to consider when entering a transaction in a human capital-intensive industry like health care? On this special crossover episode of Diagnosing Health Care and Spilling Secrets, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Kate Rigby, Erik Weibust, Dan Fahey, and Tim Murphy talk about the different types of health care M&A transactions and the importance of securing key employees post-closing.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc66.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
On April 21, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to preserve access to the prescription abortion drug mifepristone. However, while the case continues in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the future of mifepristone—and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s authority to approve new drugs—will continue to be debated on appeal. On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Erin Sutton, Delia Deschaine, and Avery Schumacher analyze the ongoing legal battle over mifepristone and discuss implications for industry stakeholders, including drug manufacturers, distributors, providers, and patients.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc65.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), signed into law in August 2022, included significant and controversial drug-pricing provisions. What key compliance issues must industry stakeholders consider as these provisions are put into effect? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Leslie Norwalk, Connie Wilkinson, and Alexis Boaz discuss key considerations for the health care and life sciences industry as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services works its way through the initial stages of implementation of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and the Medicare Prescription Drug Inflation Rebate Program under the IRA.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc64.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
A complex landscape of state laws overlays the direct access testing model, ranging from physician order requirements, such as telemedicine standards and the corporate practice of medicine doctrine, to specimen collection considerations, including how the varying options for collection could impact a model. How do these factors combine to create a roadmap for companies navigating the direct access testing industry? On the third episode of our four-part series on direct access laboratory testing, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Bob Hearn, Amy Lerman, and Megan Robertson discuss physician ordering and specimen collection considerations for direct access laboratory testing stakeholders.
Stay tuned for the final episode of our special series on direct access laboratory testing.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc63.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Renewed interest in the potential benefits of psychedelic treatments has led to an upsurge in research. Is the first FDA approval of a psychedelic for therapeutic use on the horizon? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Delia Deschaine, Lisa Gora, and Jessika Tuazon examine the history of psychedelic substances in the United States and discuss the evolving legal and regulatory considerations impacting the development, approval, distribution, and use of psychedelic therapies in the United States.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc62.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The Federal Reserve's steady increase of interest rates and the slowed economic growth have increased fiscal pressure on health care providers, leaving many to look for ways to bridge budget shortfalls through injections of capital, asset sales, or other strategic transactions. What options are there for providers moving forward? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys John Tishler, Ryan Cochran, and Tim Murphy discuss how the changing economic climate has impacted the 2023 deal cycle and forecast the trends we expect to see this year.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc61.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
In conjunction with the national COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and other federal agencies have issued waivers and other declarations with the goal of giving providers flexibility in order to render services during the PHE. How should stakeholders prepare for the end of the PHE on May 11, 2023? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Amy Lerman, Jenny Nelson Carney, and Dan Fahey discuss the expiration of the PHE and the impact it will have on health care providers and organizations.
Recorded on February 22, 2023, just prior to the release of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s proposed rules.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc60.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
When analyzing the lifecycle of any health care product, a key component to consider is how much the product will cost and who will pay for it. What unique challenges do direct access tests pose when it comes to reimbursement and related compliance requirements? On the second episode of our four-part series on direct access laboratory testing, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Bob Hearn and Megan Robertson and EBG Advisor Dr. Joel Brill discuss coverage and reimbursement for direct access tests, as well as the related compliance factors that labs, product developers, and investors in the diagnostic testing industry should be aware of.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc59.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
What are the various factors impacting stakeholders in the direct access testing industry? By the end of this four-part series on direct access laboratory testing, listeners will have gained insight into how to navigate the complex regulatory and legal regimes that govern the process of making lab tests available directly to patients and understand the aspects that will dictate how their operations should be structured. On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Amy Dow, Bob Hearn, James Boiani, and Megan Robertson discuss the regulatory landscape governing direct access laboratory testing.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc58.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued a final guidance document clarifying how the agency intends to regulate clinical decision support software (CDS). How has this document caused confusion for industry? How can companies respond? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Brad Thompson and Jessika Tuazon analyze the FDA's latest CDS guidance and discuss the challenges industry faces as it attempts to make sense of, and comply, with that guidance.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc57.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Changes are on the horizon for provisions of the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) that haven't been updated in over a decade. What exactly is PACE and how will new proposed rule modifications affect PACE plans moving forward? On this episode, special guest Wendy Edwards, Director of Internal Operations at BluePeak Advisors, and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Lynn Shapiro Snyder, Kevin Malone, and Helaine Fingold explore the ins and outs of PACE, the changes in recent years that have made PACE available to for-profit companies, and the specifics of the provisions in the pending federal proposed rule.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc56.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, which effectively removed the federal constitutional protections for abortion, triggered a series of changes for health care providers and patients alike across the nation with respect to abortion services. What additional implications are there for certain aspects of clinical trials and research? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Kate Heffernan, Marylana Helou, and Megan Robertson discuss how the changing state laws and regulations post-Dobbs may impact clinical research in different ways for different stakeholders.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc55.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
With the recent midterm elections changing the composition of Congress, and the Biden administration's first opportunities to advance its policy priorities from the very beginning of the rulemaking process, what are the key health care developments to watch out for in 2023? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Ted Kennedy, Jr., Alexis Boaz, and Philo Hall discuss the current landscape of health care policy from both the legislative and regulatory perspectives and analyze which key health care issues may arise.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc54.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
In the aftermath of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, important questions have emerged about the current legal and regulatory landscape surrounding patient access to drugs that have historically been used to induce abortions. How can health care providers and pharmacies navigate these new restrictions? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Delia Deschaine, Spreeha Choudhury, and Jessika Tuazon discuss the impact of the Dobbs decision on pharmacies and pharmacists, including patient access to certain reproductive health or abortion-inducing medications, dispensing of drugs, and scope of professional practice requirements.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc53.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The past three years have been tumultuous in the health care construction economy, and the patterns in recent construction claims might surprise some. Which types of claims are popping up, in what regions are they appearing, and what types of facilities are involved? On this episode of our Owner's Outlook series, special guest Brett Lamb, co-founder and CEO of Construction Discovery Experts, and construction attorney Chris Dunn analyze recent national trends in construction claims and discuss what health care owners can expect moving forward.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc52.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Following the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, some states have banned abortion in all or most circumstances and many more have enacted new restrictions or enforced old ones. What must providers and health care leaders understand about this patchwork of laws, the ongoing enforcement activity, and protecting their organization's interests? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Jenny Nelson Carney, Stuart Gerson, Erin Sutton, and Dan Fahey discuss the post-Dobbs legislative landscape as well as the ongoing enforcement actions in the states that prohibit all or most abortions and abortion-related services.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc51.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Following the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, some states have banned abortion in all or most circumstances and many more have enacted new restrictions or enforced old ones. What must providers and health care leaders understand about this patchwork of laws, the ongoing enforcement activity, and protecting their organization's interests? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Jenny Nelson Carney, Stuart Gerson, Erin Sutton, and Dan Fahey discuss the post-Dobbs legislative landscape as well as the ongoing enforcement actions in the states that prohibit all or most abortions and abortion-related services.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc51.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
In celebration of the 50th episode of our Diagnosing Health Care podcast, we're looking at how the past 50 years of health law will impact health care in the next 50 years. On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Mark Lutes; Lynn Shapiro Snyder; Ted Kennedy, Jr.; and Nivedita Patel talk about the past, present, and future solutions to a fundamental question: How can the United States manage health care spending while continuing to provide access to high-quality health care products and services?
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc50.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
In celebration of the 50th episode of our Diagnosing Health Care podcast, we're looking at how the past 50 years of health law will impact health care in the next 50 years. On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Mark Lutes; Lynn Shapiro Snyder; Ted Kennedy, Jr.; and Nivedita Patel talk about the past, present, and future solutions to a fundamental question: How can the United States manage health care spending while continuing to provide access to high-quality health care products and services?
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc50.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
While the COVID-19 pandemic seems to be moving into our rearview mirror, government investigations and enforcement actions targeting COVID-19-related fraud are just starting to heat up. What can businesses do to prevent or mitigate potential civil and criminal charges in this area? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Melissa Jampol, Erica Sibley Bahnsen, and Rachel Weisblatt discuss COVID-19 relief funding programs that are now subject to enforcement actions, the type of government enforcement that we've been seeing so far, and what we can expect to see next.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc49.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
While the COVID-19 pandemic seems to be moving into our rearview mirror, government investigations and enforcement actions targeting COVID-19-related fraud are just starting to heat up. What can businesses do to prevent or mitigate potential civil and criminal charges in this area? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Melissa Jampol, Erica Sibley Bahnsen, and Rachel Weisblatt discuss COVID-19 relief funding programs that are now subject to enforcement actions, the type of government enforcement that we've been seeing so far, and what we can expect to see next.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc49.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Since the beginning of 2022, prices for construction services and materials have seen significant increases. How have these increases impacted the advancement of both new and ongoing health care construction projects? On this episode of our Owner's Outlook series, Clint Russell, Vice President at HCA Healthcare, and construction attorney Chris Dunn talk about where costs are increasing, what might lie ahead, and how owners and providers can navigate a way forward for projects in the health care market.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc48.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Since the beginning of 2022, prices for construction services and materials have seen significant increases. How have these increases impacted the advancement of both new and ongoing health care construction projects? On this episode of our Owner's Outlook series, Clint Russell, Vice President at HCA Healthcare, and construction attorney Chris Dunn talk about where costs are increasing, what might lie ahead, and how owners and providers can navigate a way forward for projects in the health care market.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc48.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The COVID-19 pandemic kicked off a pivot in health care construction and design, and acute care facilities have been rapidly renovating to adapt their spaces to evolving public health care needs. On this episode of our Owner's Outlook series, attorneys Chris Dunn and David Johnston discuss how owners could see unintended consequences from designing projects without the input of skilled regulatory compliance professionals or sound construction lawyers.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc47.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
How have complaints of information blocking been submitted to the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC), and by whom? What does government enforcement action really look like? In this episode of our special series on interoperability, hear from ONC attorneys Cassie Weaver and Rachel Nelson.
Cassie, Rachel, and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Allen Killworth and Nivedita Patel discuss how to better understand the formal information-blocking complaint process, trends ONC has observed, and how those complaints could lead to enforcement action.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc46.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
How have complaints of information blocking been submitted to the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC), and by whom? What does government enforcement action really look like? In this episode of our special series on interoperability, hear from ONC attorneys Cassie Weaver and Rachel Nelson.
Cassie, Rachel, and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Allen Killworth and Nivedita Patel discuss how to better understand the formal information-blocking complaint process, trends ONC has observed, and how those complaints could lead to enforcement action.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc46.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
For years, pharmacy advocates have urged policymakers to make changes to state scope of practice laws that would permit pharmacists to prescribe and administer certain tests and vaccines at the pharmacy. How has COVID-19 impacted these efforts? In this episode, special guest Will Chang, Chief Legal Officer of UpStream, and attorneys Richard Hughes and Kala Shankle discuss the history of pharmacists' scope of practice before the pandemic, how the response to COVID-19 shifted pharmacists’ roles, and what’s next as the pandemic emergency winds down.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc45.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Over the last 12–24 months, Critical Access Hospitals have seen steep cost escalation in their expansion and renovation plans, with expense increases exceeding 10 percent. On this episode of our Owner's Outlook series, special guest Eric Shell, Chairman of Stroudwater Associates, and construction attorney Chris Dunn discuss how these hospitals can grow amid an array of challenges and what they should consider before their next expansion or development project.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc44.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
How is openEHR transforming the way health data is managed and stored across Europe? Will it soon disrupt the U.S. marketplace? In this episode of our special series on interoperability, hear from Alastair Allen, CTO of Better.
Alastair and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Karen Mandelbaum and Nivedita Patel discuss how openEHR is already being applied in such places as London and France and how examples like these could quickly become more common in the United States.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc43.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
In the past decade, certified electronic health records (EHRs) have been instrumental in transforming medical records from paper to digital formats. What obstacles are currently preventing providers from sharing patient data with each other or patients from sharing health information from their personal devices with their providers? In this episode of our special series on interoperability, hear from Tomaž Gornik, founder and CEO of Better.
Tomaž and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Karen Mandelbaum and Nivedita Patel talk about openEHR and emerging data solutions and pathways for U.S. businesses.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc42.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Staffing challenges and cost inflation are seriously impacting health care construction as well as other sectors of the U.S. construction economy. In this episode of our Owner's Outlook series, hear from special guest Mike Noli, founder of the NoliWhite Group. Mike and Epstein Becker Green construction attorney Chris Dunn break down which projects are at greatest risk and how to successfully manage these projects amid the current market pressures.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc41.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
What challenges are providers likely to face as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) prepares its permanent COVID-19 standard for health care workers? Attorneys Denise Dadika, Bob O'Hara, and Tim Murphy review the provisions of OSHA’s temporary COVID-19 standard for health care workers, what's expected to change under the permanent rules, and the impact of the agency's current enforcement push.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc40.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
What has contributed to the biotechnology industry’s explosive growth over the last several years? In this episode, special guests Don and Lisa Drakeman, two former CEOs of biotech companies, reflect on what it takes to succeed, the regulatory challenges they have faced, and how current events are shaping the future of the industry. Joining our special guests are Epstein Becker Green attorneys Robert Wanerman and Rachel Weisblatt, who address how biotech leaders, entrepreneurs, and investors can best navigate the complex legal issues that arise along the path from product development to thriving business.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc39.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
How does the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) intend to leverage its enforcement authority under the False Claims Act to advance DOJ’s recently announced Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative? Attorneys Stuart Gerson, Alaap Shah, and Bonnie Odom discuss what this initiative means for potential defendants and what companies can do to mitigate risk. The attorneys also consider whether the initiative makes practical sense and explore some potential unintended consequences.
Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc38.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The interoperability and information-blocking rules have imposed new regulations and requirements on health information exchanges (HIEs). How are HIEs responding to these new regulations in a space they have been in for decades? In this episode of our special series on interoperability, hear from Dan Paoletti, CEO of the Ohio Health Information Partnership.
Dan and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Allen Killworth and Nivedita Patel discuss the role of HIEs in the interoperability landscape and the impact of the information-blocking rules on HIEs.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc37.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
One of the long-term goals of the interoperability and information-blocking rules is to give health care providers a much more comprehensive view of a patient's entire continuum of care.
In this episode, Andrea Darby, the Vice President of IT Integration – Applications for OhioHealth, offers a provider's perspective on their role in a health care ecosystem that is striving to achieve much-needed interoperability.
Epstein Becker Green attorneys Jenny Nelson Carney and Nivedita Patel also discuss how providers are tackling the compliance challenges associated with the interoperability and information-blocking rules.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc36.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The Supreme Court recently upheld the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) vaccine mandate, which requires recipients of federal Medicare and Medicaid funding to ensure that employees, including third-party contractors, are vaccinated against COVID-19. In the first episode of “Owner's Outlook,” a special series at the intersection of health care and construction, attorneys Chris Dunn and Frank Morris discuss the scenarios in which the CMS vaccine mandate could extend to construction workers in health care facilities. Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc35.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States is set to rule in a Medicare reimbursement case that has sparked a fresh look at the historical deference often granted to agencies and whether it should remain, be modified, or even be overruled. Attorneys Stuart Gerson, Robert Wanerman, and Megan Robertson discuss why Chevron deference matters to health care industry stakeholders and what aspects of deference arguments should be in focus as these cases progress. Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc34
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The 21st Century Cures Act kicked off a major paradigm shift in the approach to accessing and sharing patient data. How will the health care industry adapt to this new way of thinking? In the first episode of our special series on interoperability, Steve Yaskin, the CEO and Co-Founder of Health Gorilla, and Epstein Becker Green’s Nivedita Patel discuss why interoperability is so important for patients and all stakeholders within the health care ecosystem. You’ll also hear about how various regulations and government actions have led to the market demand for innovative solutions to meet the interoperability requirements.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc33.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The Biden administration has released a series of rules and guidance to implement the No Surprises Act, which went into effect on January 1. All providers and facilities must now provide a good faith estimate to uninsured and self-pay patients scheduling appointments for services or upon request.
Attorneys Helaine Fingold, Robert Hearn, and Alexis Boaz discuss the good faith estimate, what it entails, who needs to provide it, and updates regarding enforcement. Additionally, you’ll hear about what “substantially in excess” means and how the provider-patient dispute process works.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc32.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The No Surprises Act (NSA) will go into effect on January 1, 2022. Since our last episode on the topic, the federal government has issued additional interim final rules and guidance to implement the NSA, including the second interim final rule. In addition to describing how the NSA interacts with the plan external review procedures, the second interim final rule describes the independent dispute resolution (IDR) process and how the IDR's determination is made.
Hear from attorneys Helaine Fingold, Lesley Yeung, and Alexis Boaz, who dive into how these changes impact entities subject to the NSA’s balance billing prohibitions.
Stay tuned for an upcoming follow-up episode, which will discuss the NSA’s good faith estimate requirement.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc31
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
We’re beginning to see how mergers and acquisitions in the hospital industry are being impacted by President Biden’s executive order promoting competition in the American economy. The Federal Trade Commission recently announced policy changes, and the Department of Justice has been asked to consider policy changes, that boards of directors and C-suite officers must take into account when weighing transactions.
On this episode of Diagnosing Health Care, special guest Dr. Subramaniam (Subbu) Ramanarayanan, Managing Director at NERA Economic Consulting, and Epstein Becker Green attorneys John Steren, Patricia Wagner, and Dan Fahey discuss what leaders need to know about the government’s heightened antitrust scrutiny in the hospital market.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc30
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
As 2021 nears a close, acute care hospitals and health systems are facing a host of financial, regulatory, and legislative challenges. Hear Rick Pollack, President and CEO of the American Hospital Association, and Epstein Becker Green’s Ted Kennedy, Jr., discuss the ways in which the industry is working with the Biden administration and Congress to shape policy around critical issues, such as surprise billing, coverage expansion, value-based care, and telehealth.
Rick and Ted look at how these policy issues relate to broader market trends. They also dive into the short- and long-term solutions that will affect acute care hospitals into the future.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc29
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
The COVID-19 pandemic spurred record growth in the dietary supplement industry in 2020. With this heightened consumer interest and many new entrants to the market, important questions have emerged about the adequacy of the current regulatory framework for dietary supplements. Are current controls adequately protecting consumers from supplement products that are unsafe? What is the right level of regulation and enforcement for these products?
In this episode of Diagnosing Health Care, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Delia Deschaine, Jack Wenik, and Bonnie Odom discuss recent trends that are shaping business decisions and compliance in the dietary supplement industry.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc28.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
On December 27, 2020, President Trump signed into law the No Surprises Act as part of the $2.3 billion Consolidated Appropriations Act. Recently, the Biden administration issued its first interim final rule in order to implement this act, which will go into effect on January 1, 2022. While the goal is to protect patients from surprise billing, the law will also impose significant compliance burdens on plans, providers, and facilities.
Epstein Becker Green attorneys Helaine Fingold, Bob Hearn, and Alexis Boaz discuss the key areas health care companies need to keep in mind as they prepare to comply with the No Surprises Act.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc27.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Although the COVID-19 pandemic exposed cybersecurity vulnerabilities across sectors, it has particularly challenged the resilience of information systems for health care and life sciences companies. Because ransomware attacks have the potential to cripple access to important data, expose patient health records, and shut down machinery and life-saving equipment, it's no surprise that health care executives continue to lose sleep thinking about potential ransomware or other similar malicious attacks.
Epstein Becker Green attorneys Alaap B. Shah and Jessika Tuazon are joined by Andrew Morrison, principal at Deloitte & Touche LLP and Cyber Risk Services Strategy, Defense & Response solution leader for Deloitte Risk & Financial Advisory. Together, they discuss the impact of ransomware attacks on the health care and life sciences industries, and considerations for companies to strengthen their cybersecurity posture.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc26
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
In accordance with changes enacted at the end of 2020, health plans and insurers must prepare to provide regulators with documentation of their compliance with mental health parity requirements on specific non-quantitative treatment limits. Special guest Henry Harbin, MD, Health Care Consultant and former CEO of Magellan Health Services, and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Kevin Malone, David Shillcutt, and Tim Murphy discuss what the new federal enforcement approach to mental health parity means for key stakeholders.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc25
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Federal and state cannabis regulation and enforcement appear to be moving in different directions. Epstein Becker Green attorneys Delia Deschaine, Nathaniel Glasser, and Megan Robertson discuss how new developments in 2021 impact the cannabis industry and why all players, including employers, health care providers and retailers, and businesses operating in the cannabis space, need to pay close attention to the different nuances between federal and state laws.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc24
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
As the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine continues, today’s episode looks at the risk potential of vaccine passports. Epstein Becker Green attorneys Patricia Wagner, Alaap Shah, and Jessika Tuazon discuss the privacy and security concerns companies must weigh as they consider developing or implementing vaccine passports, such as the collection and use of an individual's personal health information and the best practices to mitigate risk.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc23.
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode examines how COVID-19 liability shield laws may give health care businesses a false sense of security and offer little protection when it comes to employment claims. Epstein Becker Green attorneys Denise Merna Dadika, Gregory Keating, and Elena Quattrone discuss the unintended liability consequences health care employers must consider as they transition more employees back to in-person work and the ways to mitigate increasing whistleblower and retaliation risks.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc22
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode looks at the long-awaited companion final rules advancing value-based care published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services. Epstein Becker Green attorneys Anjali Downs, Jennifer Michael, Lesley Yeung, and Paulina Grabczak give an overview of the final rules and point out key issues health care companies should carefully consider as they take advantage of these value-based care safe harbors and exceptions.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc21
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode looks at the health-specific portions of the American Rescue Plan, including money for rural hospitals, billions of dollars for COVID-19 testing and contact tracing, and extra subsidies to help people buy health coverage through an Affordable Care Act plan. Epstein Becker Green attorneys Mark Lutes, Philo Hall, and Tim Murphy discuss what these changes and upcoming congressional priorities might mean for stakeholders.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc20
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode looks at how the Biden administration’s use of the Defense Production Act ("DPA") to speed up the production of vaccines and increase the domestic production of COVID-19 tests, personal protective equipment (or “PPE”), and other essential supplies is presenting challenges for medical product suppliers. Epstein Becker Green attorneys Neil Di Spirito, Constance Wilkinson, and Bonnie Odom discuss the administration's reliance on the DPA.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc19
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode discusses the factors impacting an individual’s decision to get vaccinated and the ways that policies and practices at the federal, state, local, and tribal levels can support equity, transparency, accountability, availability, and access to COVID-19 vaccines.
Featured are special guest Richard Hughes IV, Vice President of Public Policy at Moderna, and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Victoria Vaskov Sheridan and Jessika Tuazon.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc18
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode looks at the 117th Congressional agenda and the prospects for additional coronavirus relief and what that would mean for stakeholders, as well as the possibility for coverage expansion through changes to the Affordable Care Act or Medicaid. Attorneys Mark Lutes, Philo Hall, and Timothy Murphy also discuss which legislative items are most likely to require 60 votes in the Senate or pass through budget reconciliation.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc17
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode looks at why physician practices accepting risk-based payments from health plans are attractive to investors. Special guest Jason Madden, Managing Director at Accordion, and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Joshua Freemire, Jason Christ, and Tim Murphy, dive into the health regulatory considerations investors must assess when evaluating investment opportunities with physician practices accepting risk-based payments.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc16
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode looks at the Biden Administration's first 100 days in office and the potential executive orders, regulations, and new legislation with noteworthy health care policy implications. Attorneys Philo Hall, Ted Kennedy, Jr., and Paulina Grabczak discuss President Biden’s priorities, including his COVID-19 response plan, and examine which "midnight rules" put in place by the Trump Administration could be intercepted or retained.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc15
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode examines the fraud and abuse enforcement landscape in the telehealth space and considers ways telehealth providers can mitigate their enforcement risks as they move into the new year. Attorneys Amy Lerman, Melissa Jampol, and Bonnie Scott discuss how the uptick in enforcement warrants close consideration by telehealth providers, especially those that are new to the space and have not yet built their compliance infrastructures.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc14
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode looks at the privacy concerns when health care businesses and employers are implementing contact tracing technologies. Contact tracing will continue to play a big role as we look to understand the impact of COVID-19 vaccines. Guests are attorneys Michelle Capezza and Karen Mandelbaum and attorney Jessika Tuazon hosts.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc13
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode looks at what oral arguments in California v. Texas tell us about how the Supreme Court might rule in deciding the fate of the Affordable Care Act ("ACA"). You’ll also hear about how Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s recent appointment could impact the ACA and other health law decisions in the upcoming term. The episode features Member of the Firm Stuart Gerson and is hosted by attorney Tim Murphy.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc12
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode dives into the prospects of coverage expansion following the 2020 elections and also examines three major health care policy reform issues that have bipartisan support and could see traction regardless of who wins on November 3. The episode features Members of the Firm Ted Kennedy, Jr., and Lynn Shapiro Snyder as well as Senior Counsel Philo Hall, and is hosted by attorney Tim Murphy.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc11
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode looks at the key business, policy, and legal considerations for reshoring active pharmaceutical ingredient (or “API”) and finished drug product manufacturing to the United States. The episode features Members of the Firm Delia Deschaine and Neil Di Spirito and is hosted by attorney Bonnie Scott.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc10
Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode is part of our special series, “The Future of Health Care: Health Care Delivery and Consolidation Trends in 2020 and Beyond.” Host and attorney Gary Herschman speaks with Darren Black, Managing Director, Summit Partners, about how changes to the delivery of health care will impact acquisition strategies and consolidation trends in the future.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc9
Subscribe for email notifications – https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit – http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode looks at the adjustments to business operations and compliance programs that pharmaceutical and medical device companies need to consider as they launch new products during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The episode is hosted by attorney Jessika Tuazon and features attorneys Julie Lampley and Lauren Sullivan and strategic advisor Machelle Dunavant Shields.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc8
Subscribe for email notifications – https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit – http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode is part of our special series, “The Future of Health Care: Health Care Delivery and Consolidation Trends in 2020 and Beyond.” Host and attorney Gary Herschman speaks with Carsten Beith, Managing Director, Cain Brothers, about how changes to the delivery of health care will impact acquisition strategies and consolidation trends in the future.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc7.
Subscribe for email notifications – https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit – http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode is part of our special series, “The Future of Health Care: Health Care Delivery and Consolidation Trends in 2020 and Beyond.” Host and attorney Gary Herschman speaks with Barry Ostrowsky, President & CEO, RWJBarnabas Health, about how changes to the delivery of health care will impact acquisition strategies and consolidation trends in the future.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc6
Subscribe for email notifications – https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit – http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s episode dives into the status of the Food and Drug Administration’s plan for regulating cannabis and cannabis-derived products and what actions the agency has taken recently to make progress. The episode features Delia Deschaine and is hosted by Megan Robertson, both attorneys in Epstein Becker Green’s Washington, DC, office.
Visit our site for more information and related resources: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc5
Subscribe for email notifications – https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit – http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Guests on today’s episode discuss contingency planning and risk mitigation strategies as health care businesses prepare for the long haul of overcoming a potential second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The episode features special guest Alexandra Khorover, General Counsel at RefuahHealth, and Anjana Patel, a Member of the Firm at Epstein Becker Green. Attorney Paulina Grabczak hosts.
Visit our site for resources and more: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc4
Subscribe for email notifications – https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe
Visit - http://diagnosinghealthcare.com
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Guests on today’s episode talk about how the government’s fraud and abuse enforcement priorities have shifted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and how compliance programs must also pivot to mitigate new risks. The episode is hosted by Bonnie Scott and features Stuart Gerson, Melissa Jampol, and Jennifer Michael, all former government enforcers and now Epstein Becker Green attorneys.
Visit our site for more information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc3
Subscribe for email notifications – https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit - http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Guests on today’s episode talk through how hospitals are addressing financial strains while also combatting the COVID-19 pandemic on the front lines. The episode is hosted by Tim Murphy and features Paul Gilbert and Colin McCulloch, all attorneys with Epstein Becker Green.
Visit our site for resources and more: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc2.
Subscribe for email notifications – https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.
Visit - http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Guests on today’s episode discuss the growing opportunity for providers to integrate telehealth into their practice through a compliant and forward-thinking approach. The episode is hosted by Megan Robertson and features Amy Lerman and Kevin Ryan, all attorneys with Epstein Becker Green.
Visit for more information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc1
Learn more through Epstein Becker Green’s Telemental Health Laws app: https://www.ebglaw.com/telemental
The following surveys were also referenced in this episode:
- “U.S. Healthcare Needs and Attitudes in the Age of COVID-19,” a COVID-19 Market Pulse published by Sage Growth/Blackbook Research - https://blackbookmarketresearch.com/administrator/img/0188_SGP_COVID-19%20Market%20Pulse_r2.pdf
- “Americans’ Perceptions of Telehealth in the Era of COVID-19,” a Sykes Survey Report - https://www.sykes.com/reports/2020-telehealth-survey/
- “US Doctors Turn to Telehealth As Covid-19 Limits In-Person Care,” a Bain & Company Snap Chart by Joshua Weisbrod, Michael Brookshire, and Erin Ney, MD - https://www.bain.com/insights/us-doctors-turn-to-telehealth-as-covid-19-limits-in-person-care-snap-chart/
Subscribe for email notifications - https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe/
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
Today’s health care industry is a high-stakes environment full of legal, policy, and regulatory-related obstacles. There are also tremendous opportunities, and in order to thrive, it is critical for executives, general counsel, and administrators to have a consistent pulse on trends and available business solutions. In this episode, attorneys Megan Robertson and Tim Murphy introduce the Epstein Becker Green Diagnosing Health Care podcast and discuss the range of future topics with attorney George Breen, Chair of the firm’s Health Care and Life Sciences Steering Committee.
The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.