waste – composting – Institute for Local Self-Reliance: Recent Episodes
waste – composting – Institute for Local Self-Reliance
Across the country, a growing number of States are considering and adopting healthy soils policies, though very few of these policies recognize compost application as a proven soil health-building practice. This presents an unprecedented opportunity to both promote composting and connect the practice to soil health and climate protection.
Soil, home to 59% of life on earth, provides life-sustaining ecosystem services including support for human food systems and climate change mitigation. The addition of compost to soil is among the fastest ways of replenishing soil organic matter, which not only protects soil health, but is also likely to increase soil carbon storage – especially in depleted soils.
Composting also provides unique opportunities to facilitate circular and holistic food systems by linking food waste diversion efforts to regenerative soil practices, and urban centers to areas of food production. However, policy is needed to encourage and invest in the production of high-quality compost and its application to land to maximize the benefits to soils, farms, and climate.
This Healthy Soils and Compost Policy Guide provides an overview of the overlap between healthy soils and compost in policy, as well as opportunities for policy to advance soil health practices, high-quality compost production, and compost use throughout the country. It is designed for advocates, policymakers, and curious minds to explore a menu of policy avenues to address the critical need to both build soil health and divert organic materials from disposal via compost.
| | |
Download the Guide HereThis guide was originally published in October 2023 and updated in April 2024 with refined framing and information on contamination, incorporating valuable stakeholder feedback. We intend to update this document as the landscape progresses, if you have suggestions of sample policies we might have missed, let us know (email sjones@ilsr.org).
Thanks to Steven Keleti and for his support in the creation of this guide.
Watch our December 2023 webinar featuring this guide and presentations from healthy soil policy experts here
To share these materials under creative commons license, free of cost, we request you credit the Institute for Local Self-Reliance by including the following:
Source: Sophia Jones and Linda Bilsens Brolis, Healthy Soils and Compost Policy Guide: Synergies and Opportunities, Institute for Local Self-Reliance, 2023 (ilsr.org/healthy-soils-compost-policy-guide). Reprinted with permission.
Check out our Infographics: Compost Impacts More Than You Think * How Composting Combats the Climate Crisis * Compost for a Better Planet * Hierarchy to Reduce Food Waste and Grow Community*
Watch ILSR’s On-Farm Composting and Compost Use webinar series
For Immediate Release: March 13, 2024Media Contact: Reggie Rucker
Institute for Local Self-Reliance Launches BIPOC Community Composter Mini-Grant Program in New England Coastal States[WASHINGTON, DC] – Several New England states have enacted legislation to divert wasted food from disposal, mainly targeting large generators. With the focus on addressing industrial sites, there is a notable lack of support for schools, community gardens, and urban farms in historically excluded neighborhoods to establish a local circular economy.
The Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) is proud to announce the launch of the BIPOC Community Composter Mini-Grant Program. The program aims to support new or existing local community composters in coastal states in New England and is specifically geared toward BIPOC-led or BIPOC-serving organizations, Native Nations, and those working in historically excluded neighborhoods. This new opportunity is made possible by 11th Hour Racing’s grant program, funded by The Schmidt Family Foundation.
Through the BIPOC Community Composter Mini-Grant Program, ILSR will provide $100,000 in sub-grants to as many as ten selected projects. Grants will range from a minimum of $5,000 to a maximum of $20,000.
“This dedicated focus on BIPOC-led and BIPOC-serving community composters is long overdue,” said Brenda Platt, director of ILSR’s Composting for Community Initiative, about the grant program. “These are the communities that for decades have borne the brunt of neighborhood disinvestment, environmental racism, and the negative consequences of climate change. This grant program is one step toward the work society must continue doing to repair the harms of previous generations and restore access and opportunity to communities of color engaged in land stewardship and environmental preservation.”
Melvin Alvarez, grant program manager at 11th Hour Racing, added, “11th Hour Racing is committed to growing small, decentralized compost programs and infrastructure that benefits ocean and soil health. We are proud to support the Institute for Local Self-Reliance’s efforts to grow composting in the northeast while prioritizing access and funding to communities of color.”
Eligibility for the program is open to BIPOC-led or BIPOC-serving organizations, Native Nations, and those working in historically excluded neighborhoods. Projects must fund new or existing local community composting initiatives. Applicants must reside within a New England coastal state, including Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. The program welcomes a diverse range of applicants, including community gardens, educational institutions, farms, food co-ops, for-profits, governmental institutions, Native Nations, non-profits, and worker-owned co-ops.
The application period for the BIPOC Community Composter Mini-Grant Program opened on March 4, 2024, and runs through April 2, 2024. Interested individuals and organizations can apply by completing a written application or by submitting a video at ILSR.org. Information and applications are also available in Spanish.
Ashley Muspratt, the president and CEO of the Center for EcoTechnology (CET), expressed their support for the program, stating, “As an organization committed to advancing just and resilient climate solutions, CET deeply believes in supporting wasted food solutions that are BIPOC-led. This grant program has the potential to bring big picture concepts like ‘the circular economy’ down to a local level while centering Black, Indigenous, and people of color that are already doing this important work.”
Ella Kilpatrick Kotner, Harvest Cycle Compost program coordinator at Groundwork RI, added, “We are thrilled by the announcement of the BIPOC Composter Mini-Grant Program! Community composting not only reduces organic waste sent to landfills but creates more resilient and sustainable communities by connecting people with their neighbors, returning nutrients to soils, creating good green jobs, and closing the loop between food production, consumption, and discards. Funding BIPOC organizations working within these communities to create the alternative infrastructure that will turn waste into wealth is not only critical but makes perfect sense.”
For more information about the BIPOC Community Composter Mini-Grant Program and to apply, please visit the ILSR website. Together, we can build resilient and sustainable communities while fostering equity and inclusivity in the composting sector.
About the Institute for Local Self-Reliance
The Institute for Local Self-Reliance, founded in 1974, is a national research, advocacy, and technical assistance organization that empowers communities to take charge of their local resources, economies, and environmental future. Through its Composting for Community Initiative, ILSR promotes distributed and diverse local composting across the country, aiming to cut food loss, enhance soils and watersheds, support local food production, and protect the climate while addressing community prosperity and equity.
The E.P.A. is accepting public comments until March 15, 2024, on the Waste Reduction Model (WARM) version 16 and its supporting documentation. In an effort to “improve the usability, integrity, and functionality of WARM,” the EPA intends to use these comments along with findings from an external peer review and data quality assessment to update the current model.
WARM is a measurement tool to estimate and compare potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy savings, and economic impacts of various materials management practices, including source reduction, recycling, composting, anaerobic digestion, combustion (incineration), and landfilling. Emissions, energy units, and economic factors are measured across materials commonly found in municipal solid waste and construction and demolition debris.
The methodology and assumptions used for WARM’s estimations have significant implications – the tool is used to weigh and compare the benefits and drawbacks of materials management practices relative to each other. These estimates are used in consequential decision-making for policy, regulation, funding, and more, and inaccuracies in measurement assumptions elicit biased results.
In response to the EPA’s request and to strengthen the measurement model and reduce current biases, the Institute for Local Self-Reliance submitted the comments below. The U.S. Composting Council also developed recommendations to include in public comments.
We urge you to also submit public comments, and we welcome the use of our comments to inform or guide responses or to be copied and pasted directly into your submission.
Public comments can be submitted through March 15, 2024, through docket number EPA-HQ-OLEM-2023-0451 in Regulations.gov.
Comments on the E.P.A. Waste Reduction Model version 16 (WARM 16) Docket No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2023-0451Submitted by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance
Dear Administrator Regan,
Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments on EPA’s Waste Reduction Model version 16 (WARM 16). The Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) is a national nonprofit research and educational organization that advocates for thriving, diverse, and equitable communities. We respectfully request your consideration of our comments and recommendations outlined in this letter, which have been informed by nearly 50 years of experience providing assistance to communities to reduce and recycle wasted materials.
ILSR commends the EPA for its continuous efforts to improve and update the measurement tool and for seeking input through public comments. However, WARM 16 continues to have several flaws that hinder progress in mitigating and adapting to climate change. The current form falls short of its goal to allow for an adequate comparison among available solid waste management options. In response, ILSR offers the following recommendations to rectify several shortcomings in the tool that bias results and impede future efforts.
- Include decentralized composting systems in emissions factors
- Consider increased soil water retention in composting emissions factors
- Update research on compost’s ability to displace synthetic fertilizers, fungicides, and pesticides
- Factor bCO2 emissions (carbon dioxide emissions from biogenic materials) into emissions calculations
- Update methane’s Global Warming Potential (GWP) to 80.8 – 82.5 over 20 years and an atmospheric life of 11.8 years to reflect IPCC’s 2021 Assessment Report (AR 6)
- Reconsider utility CO2 emissions in combustion net emissions calculations
- Report methane emissions separately from other GHGs
Furthermore, we urge EPA to strongly consider the copious additional benefits of composting not represented through emissions calculations when comparing solid waste management options. Excluding benefits such as improved climate resiliency and living natural systems creates an unfair disadvantage for closed-loop, nature-based solutions like composting. We thank you for your consideration of our recommendations.
Recommendations for Waste Reduction Model (WARM)
1) Include decentralized composting systems in emissions factorsWARM 16 models composting only in central composting facilities with windrow piles, citing a lack of data for small-scale composting and other large-scale operations as the reason. However, decentralized, distributed composting is a quickly growing part of the sector, warranting its inclusion in WARM to represent the field accurately. 90% of composting programs in our 2022 census launched since 2010, with over half launching since 2016. Of 2,987 composting facilities with scale data in a 2017 study, 79% were small-scale composters (composting less than 5,000 tons of feedstock per year). With this increase in decentralized activity, access to data should not be a barrier.
Decentralized solutions, such as composting at home, community gardens, urban and local farms, schools, and local government sites, are managed by local, distributed networks of independent businesses, worker cooperatives, nonprofit organizations, and local governments. Community-based composting operations often make and use compost within the same community where wasted food and other materials are generated. Keeping the processes and products as local as possible keeps benefits and profits local and within the community. Decentralized composting offers abundant co-benefits that protect the climate, build healthy soils, stimulate economic growth, enhance food security, and build more prosperous, equitable, and resilient communities. Omitting decentralized composting operations from WARM 16 has created emissions factor modeling inaccuracies.
- By excluding decentralized composting, emissions associated with transporting compost are inflated. Centralized composting operations are more likely than community composting operations to be located further away from the community where collection occurs, resulting in further distance traveled and higher transportation energy emissions. WARM 16 also assumes transport by a diesel short-haul truck. However, we are seeing a growth in clean energy modes of transportation in our network; a number of our community composting partners are using electric vehicles and bicycles (pedal and electric-powered) for collection. WARM should address the currently stated limitations that “did not allow for variation in transportation distances.”
- Leaving out decentralized operations renders emissions associated with turning equipment inaccurate. 44% of community composters did not use windrows for composting but used alternative methods with different levels of machinery (including manual labor only). Increasingly a number of community composters are powering aeration systems with solar and electric power and not fossil fuel energy. For example, LA Compost is moving toward electric-powered bobcats for their composting operations. Machinery emissions in the current model are likely inflated.
These discrepancies place decentralized composters at a disadvantage when utilizing WARM 16 for reporting and funding opportunities. The current version does not accurately reflect the impacts and benefits of their operations due to these inaccuracies.
2) Consider increased soil water retention in composting emissions factorsWARM 16 acknowledges that “compost use also has been shown to increase soil water retention; moister soil gives a number of ancillary benefits, including reduced irrigation costs and reduced energy used for pumping water.” However, these benefits and avoided emissions are not included in WARM 16. Composting emissions factors should address these energy offsets to represent emissions benefits accurately.
3) Update research on compost’s ability to displace synthetic fertilizers, fungicides, and pesticidesSynthetic fertilizers, fungicides, and pesticides collectively have an enormous greenhouse gas profile and should be accurately reflected in WARM. Outdated or inaccurate assumptions on composting’s ability to displace fertilizer can understate the value of composting and compost application. Only looking at NPK nutrients is insufficient to calculate the offset of fertilizers as the benefits of compost have to do with soil structure and beneficial biology. Applying high-quality compost to agricultural soil as a soil health management practice can be crucial for both rebuilding and protecting soil. Compost as a soil amendment improves soil structure, increases soil fertility, suppresses plant disease, improves nutrient cycling, prevents soil erosion, and increases soil resilience to drought and extreme weather. We know farmers that have stopped using synthetic/fossil fuel fertilizers altogether. Furthermore, not all compost is created equal. For example, vermicompost made from worms is higher in beneficial biology and growth hormones. EPA should take into consideration the use of vermicompost to adequately capture these advantages. This is an important issue that should be given continuous and adequate attention. The EPA should be looking to update WARM 16’s data on this issue, which is now a decade old, and use multiple studies to inform assumptions. EPA should conduct ongoing research to continuously update this information to most accurately reflect the value of composting and compost application.
4) Factor bCO2 emissions (carbon dioxide emissions from biogenic materials) into emissions calculationsWe support the excellent research of Energy Justice Network and Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA) on this topic. As recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change guidelines: “if incineration of waste is used for energy purposes, both fossil and biogenic should be estimated… biogenic CO2 should be reported as an information item…Moreover, if combustion, or any other factor, is causing long term decline in the total carbon embodied in living biomass (e.g., forests), this net release of carbon should be evident in the calculation of CO2 emissions.”
Excluding bCO2 emissions causes bias in favor of incineration. WARM 16 assumes the carbon dioxide emissions from biogenic organic materials (e.g., paper and wood products, yard trimming, and food discards) do not count. The rationale is that plants and trees regrow, and carbon dioxide emissions return carbon to the atmosphere previously sequestered by photosynthesis and would cycle back eventually under natural conditions due to degradation processes. This assumption can exclude 90% of CO2 emissions from incineration but omits a smaller fraction of GHG emissions from landfill calculations (as the model counts methane but not CO2 emissions). Favoring disposal in an incinerator versus a landfill does not cause additional plant and tree regrowth. It is, therefore, biased to grant a large emissions discount to incinerators that does not equally apply to landfills. Although we promote the diversion of all organic materials from landfills or incinerators, WARM 16 incorrectly assumes incineration is better for the climate than landfilling. Along with its dire climate impacts, incineration has devastating air pollution, health, and environmental justice implications.
The exclusion of bCO2 emissions does not account for the time-sensitivity of climate change. WARM 16 assumptions acknowledge that “this approach does not distinguish between the timing of CO2 emissions, provided that they occur in a reasonably short time scale relative to the speed of the processes that affect global climate change. In other words, as long as the biogenic carbon would eventually be released as CO2, whether it is released virtually instantaneously (e.g., from combustion) or over a period of a few decades (e.g., decomposition on the forest floor) is inconsequential.” Human activity – including the release of bCO2 through deforestation, incineration, and more – has already altered the Earth’s climate, and severe impacts are anticipated within a decade. The timeframe of emissions impacts is exceedingly crucial, and the magnitude of GHG reductions in the short-term (by 2030) is increasingly of focus in climate mitigation strategies. Delaying the release of bCO2 for even short periods can help avoid overloading short-term atmospheric loading, which could trigger cascading tipping points in the Earth System.
Biogenic carbon in waste can also be stored for long periods. Wood can store significant fractions of biogenic carbon for up to 100 years; compost can trigger enhanced, long-term carbon sequestration in soil, etc. The IPCC acknowledges that 65% (range: 35-95%) of all biogenic carbon in landfills will remain in place for over a century.
5) Update methane’s Global Warming Potential (GWP) to 80.8 – 82.5 over 20 years and an atmospheric life of 11.8 years to reflect IPCC’s 2021 Assessment Report (AR 6)WARM 16 severely understates the global warming potential (GWP) of methane. WARM 16 uses the GWP factor from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007 Assessment. As such, WARM 16 calculates methane’s GWP as 25, comparing methane to carbon dioxide on a 100-year basis. However, IPCC’s 2021 Assessment Report (AR 6) identifies methane as a short-lived greenhouse gas with a GWP of 80.8 – 82.5 over 20 years and an atmospheric life of 11.8 years. Methane to carbon dioxide emissions conversions may be a shorthand inventory tool, but WARM is intended for decision-making purposes and should model real-world behavior. WARM 16 assumptions understate the benefits of avoiding methane through organic management practices and are inconsistent with approaches to reduce short-lived GHGs to slow the rate of climate change. Indeed, all climate pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions should be adjusted to a 20-year climate horizon, not 100 years.
6) Reconsider utility CO2 emissions in combustion net emissions calculations We support Energy Justice Network‘s excellent research on this topic. WARM 16 assumes that electricity generated by combustion avoids using fossil fuels on the electric grid and, therefore, subtracts avoided fossil fuel emissions in net calculations. However, most incinerators are displacing renewable energy sources, not fossil fuels. At least two-thirds of U.S. trash incinerators that generate electricity operate in states where they are eligible to sell renewable energy credits (RECs) to electric utilities under state renewable energy mandates. Many of these incinerators are selling RECs in these markets, directly competing with actual renewable energy sources (mainly wind, solar, and hydroelectric). If utilities could not buy RECs from trash incinerators to meet state mandates, they would have to buy them from actual renewable energy sources. In these cases, trash incinerators are displacing renewable energy, not fossil fuels. Therefore, subtracting these emissions as avoided from combustion net calculations is inappropriate.
Additionally, the electric grid is rapidly shifting from coal to wind and solar. ILSR tracks this here. WARM 16 assumptions regarding fossil fuel avoidance are exceedingly outdated for waste planning purposes. Even if modeling with the most recently available data, WARM 16 calculations do not reflect fossil fuel’s share of the electricity grid looking forward. WARM must provide future projections (or a heavy disclaimer) if used to support long-term decisions and investments in waste disposal methods.
7) Report methane emissions separately from other GHGsWe support Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA)’s excellent research on this topic. Methane, along with other short-lived climate pollutants, is currently the focus of intensive work and investment. For example, the LOW-Methane initiative under the U.S. State Department is dedicated to reducing methane emissions from waste by 100 million tons in the next few years. The EPA’s recent report quantifying methane emissions from landfilled food waste further demonstrates the importance of measuring methane, especially in the waste management industry. The 2023 Global Methane Pledge Ministerial from COP28 states, “Achieving the GMP goal of cutting anthropogenic methane emissions by at least 30% by 2030 from 2020 levels is the fastest way to reduce near-term warming and is essential to keep a 1.5°C temperature limit within reach.” This effort requires accurate tools for both forecasting and monitoring interventions. Unfortunately, in its current version 16, WARM cannot serve these goals.
Rather than combine fossil CO2 and other GHGs into a single CO2e metric, WARM should follow the example of databases such as eGRID, which reports each gas separately. Separating measurements allows users to distinguish between short- and long-lived GHGs as needed. It also eliminates the need to recalculate CO2e as Global Warming Potentials are updated in reports – a problem that has already rendered many calculations outdated. For those users who prefer to use the single CO2e metric, calculating it from individual gasses can be included as an option.
ILSR developed these Composting Learning Activities under its Neighborhood Soil Rebuilders Composter Training Program to assist community composting sites in training their own community participants. These Learning Activities provide a hands-on complement to our Community Composting 101 Online Certificate Course, which prepares participants to establish and manage composting projects that both engage and serve their communities. These Learning Activities are available for free! Please take a moment to tell us about how you will use these resources, provide feedback, or give input on future resources.
| | Composting 101 Training GuideThis 6-page training guide covers the fundamentals of composting, including benefits of composting, building and managing a compost pile, and troubleshooting. |
The following Learning Activities cover different aspects of the composting process. Each Learning Activity covers: duration, appropriate age group, learning objectives, materials needed, and instructions.
| | Identifying Compostable MaterialsDuration: 20-minute minimumAge Group: All ages | | | Building Piles and Measuring Bulk DensityDuration: 2 hoursAge Group: High school age and older | | | Hand Squeeze Moisture TestDuration: 15 to 30 minutesAge Group: All ages | | | Demonstrating the Water-holding Benefits of CompostDuration: 15 minutesAge Group: All ages | | | Seed Germination Test to Determine MaturityDuration: 5 days to 2 weeks (depending on seeds used)Age Group: All ages |
The community composting sector could create nearly as many new jobs as currently exists in the coal mining industry, according to the new report released by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR).… Read More
The Institute for Local Self-Reliance’s (ILSR) Composting for Community Initiative has collaborated with partners in Baltimore to advance scalable, community-driven composting sites, aiming to shift leadership, power, and resources to the community level. This article showcases the progress made and challenges faced in our work with Community Composters in Baltimore.… Read More
One day pumpkin composting will be as common as Christmas tree recycling. Check out these pro tips to keep your pumpkins out of landfills and incinerators.… Read More
In collaboration with the US Composting Council (USCC) and BioCycle, the Institute for Local Self-Reliance announces two events to be held in conjunction with the USCC’s International Conference and Trade Show, COMPOST2018, in Atlanta.… Read More
A newly released guide from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) aims to support composters at community gardens, schools, urban farms, and other community venues in successfully managing their composting process to prevent attracting rodents.… Read More
Contrary to popular belief, composting in cities does not cause rodent problems. This guide shows how composting food scraps, instead of dumping them in the trash, has the power to mitigate rodent pressures in urban neighborhoods.… Read More
Across the U.S., the effects of 2022’s record high heat temperatures are widespread as climate change continues to exacerbate rising temperatures, intensifying heat-induced dangers to the public health and wellbeing of urban communities, Baltimore included. While the corporate sector is responsible for the majority of emissions causing rapid climate change, there are some green infrastructure and waste-reduction practices to enlist at the local level that can help curb the impacts of the warming climate.… Read More
Linda Bilsens Brolis, senior project manager for the Composting for Community Initiative at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance explains how renters can take an active role in combating climate change through composting.… Read More
A per-ton surcharge on waste disposed is a funding mechanism with a proven track record of raising funds to reduce and recycle waste. This model bill serves to address the need for state investment into waste reduction and diversion programs and infrastructure by establishing major grant funding based on a nominal surcharge on waste disposal. This document is intended for use as a template for a bill that any state can adapt and introduce.… Read More
ILSR has been assisting grass roots organizations in Baltimore to fend off new incinerators and shut down an existing aging and polluting garbage incinerator in Downtown Baltimore, planning for and implementing Zero Waste practices. These practices would also help the city and communities address other pressing problems in the city; including the need for more good jobs, reduced recidivism, elimination of the 'digital divide', and creation of new small businesses, community based food production and environmental education.
The following article makes suggestions for transforming the current recycling system, and an update on community based activity in the context of rapidly changing markets, technology and entrepreneurial opportunities.… Read More
With momentum from the wins for composting achieved during Maryland’s 2021 legislative session, ILSR’s Composting Initiative team supported three composting-related bills during Maryland’s 2022 legislative session. Our team continues to push to advance necessary and visionary policy on composting, waste diversion, and healthy soils in Maryland.… Read More
The California Plastic Waste Reduction Regulations Initiative has the potential to send ripples through the world’s fifth largest economy as the state aims to lead on waste reduction. … Read More
ILSR’s Composting for Community team has worked closely with Delegate Regina T. Boyce to introduce the Solid Waste Disposal and Diversion and On-Farm Composting and Compost Use bill (HB 1070) for Maryland’s 2022 legislative session.… Read More
From domestic cities like Ocean City, Maryland to Salem, Oregon and international locations from Ontario, Canada and the United Kingdom, we provide updates on garbage incineration efforts around the globe.… Read More