Craves Controversy analyzes judicial opinions from a legal perspective, breaking down constitutional amendments as they’ve been reinterpreted over time by Supreme Court case law.
Discussing The American Legion v. American Humanist Association (2019) and the 1st Amendment's Establishment Clause. Mentions McCreary County v. ACLU (2005) and Van Orden v. Perry (2005).
Discussing Cady v. Dombrowski (1973) and the 4th Amendment. Mentions Caniglia v. Strom (2021).
Discussing Sveen v. Melin (2018) and the Contracts Clause. Mentions Home Building & Loan Assoc. v. Blaisdell (1934).
Discussing Kansas v. Boettger and Kansas v. Johnson (2020) and the First Amendment Free Speech Clause. Mentions Virginia v. Black (2003) and Watts v. United States (1969).
Discussing Fisher v. University of Texas (2013) and standards of judicial review as it pertains to the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Mentions Fisher v. University of Texas (2016), Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), and Gratz v. Bollinger (2003).
Discussing Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Mentions Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), Gratz v. Bollinger (2003), and affirmative action.
Discussing Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018) and its effect on the First Amendment. Mentions Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940).
Discussing District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and it’s effect on the Second Amendment. Mentions United States v. Miller (1939).