Background Many of today’s interesting problems stem from the ability to generate and process large volumes of data, such as for instance, intelligent power grids and smart cities that form part of the Internet of Things. But the ability to work with all this data has to match the demand and as Moore’s law stops scaling, chipmakers will no longer be able to shrink transistors small enough to continue the trend of doubling how many they can fit on their integrated circuits every 12 or 18 months. Clearly, if the speed of processing power is to continue to develop to meet such demands, new forms of computing need to be found; new algorithms need to be developed to make efficient use of these new forms of computation; and new mathematical challenges arise in the design and analysis of these new algorithms.
In addition to the development of quantum computers, a number of novel computational paradigms, or next-generation computing architectures are emerging and more are likely to follow. Many have been inspired by the fundamental structure and function of the human brain. New computing paradigms are needed that are not only faster, use less power and are physically smaller, as well as those that could enable data storage/processing in contexts where current paradigms would be too expensive.
Neuromorphic computing for example, has included the development of chips that use “spiking neurons” as the basic computational building block. They attempt to model in silicon the massively parallel way the brain processes information as billions of neurons and trillions of synapses respond to sensory inputs such as visual and auditory stimuli. The implementation of neuromorphic computing at the hardware level can be realized by oxide-based memristors, threshold switches and transistors. Memristors are materials based on molecular or ionic mechanisms which act as conductors, emulating biological systems.
Similarly, massively-parallel computing structures, such as that developed as part of the UK’s Project Spinnaker, use “spiking networks” to sensibly simulate, in real time, the behaviour of a billion neurons. Additionally, advances in DNA-based data processing and storage are predicted to have a significant influence on theoretical and practical progress in the computer sciences.
So a key question is - what could you compute on new forms of computation?
Aims and Objectives This workshop is a collaboration with GCHQ and aims to investigate potential next-generation advances in novel computational paradigms. A key aim is to bring together relevant stakeholders from across various UK research communities and industry. It is hoped that this activity will help to build closer links and collaborations and aid the establishment of a joined up multi-disciplinary UK community for this area. Disciplines identified so far as being relevant include synthetic biology, neuroscience, metamaterials, electronics/electrical engineering, AI/Machine learning, computer science and robotics and physics.
The event will also provide a forum for identifying challenges and increasing awareness of R&D activities across the different elements of the research communities. It is hoped that this will help to gain consensus on what the future research directions should be, for novel computational technologies, stimulating further interest from end-users towards helping to develop and invest in the novel computer paradigms area.
Over the two days, this event will include presentations from researchers as well as an end-user session, where ‘problem holders’ will present on current and future challenges and reflect how new computational innovations might be of benefit and how they might be implemented. Areas covered will include a number of key current and future research directions will be highlighted including:
Neuromorphic computing - such as memristors and massively parallel computing structures
Biologically inspired paradigms – DNA based computation and storage
Materials for novel circuits
Novel architectures
Problem owner perspectives – to include security, healthcare and financial areas
Dr. Peper
Emil Björnson, Erik G. Larsson
Oxford University
sirgoofy
sirgoofy
sirgoofy
Sam Charrington
Chris Coleman
Machine Learning Street Talk
Navya Ramakrishnan
CosmiQ Works
Brock Palen
The School of Physics and Astronomy
School of Information, UC Berkeley
machinelrn
Microbial Bioinformatics
Deep Dive: AI
IEEE Computer Society
Marcel Kurovski
AutoML Media
ACTNext Navigator
BGT Productions
Unboxing AI
re:publica
Anthony Kelly
Microsoft Research India
Kaana
Kimberly Nevala, Strategic Advisor - SAS
Cambridge University
Dev
ResearchOps Community
Changelog Media
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
CSAIL Alliances
Cambridge University
neptune.ai
Lukas Biewald
CULTURE – rule 11 reader
Dr. Nels Lindahl
Cambridge University
Connected Social Media
Oxford University
Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
Fane Mensah and Synthace
Type Cast Heroes
Berkeley MDes
CarlosLaporte
mapscaping.com
mapscaping.com
Dan Fu, Karan Goel, Fiodar Kazhamakia, Piero Molino, Matei Zaharia, Chris Ré
Shephard Media
Brendon Matusch, Anish Singhani
Kyle Polich
Rich Brueckner
Notre Dame Technology Ethics Center
Kambiz Chizari, Ilyass Tabiai
Exascale Computing Project
Philipp Packmohr
Justin Grammens
Kris Villez and Jörg Rieckermann
Neha Singh
Go Computer Science
Filipe Lauar
mapscaping.com
Emese Domahidi & Mario Haim
Premio
jhonmark
Deep
Phoebe Ohayon
Intel Corporation
molpigs
DigEthix
Jousef Murad
CTIO101.COM
MLearning.ai
Manuel Pasieka
Francesco Gadaleta
Primaned
ACD/Labs
mapscaping.com
Cambridge University
Gupta Sir Academy
Stephen Fairclough
NERSC User News
RE•WORK
Oxford University
Randomly Typed
Lara
Sahana Shankar
Gerry McGovern
IQT
Allegheny College Department of Computer Science
FH Media Consulting
London Futurists
various lecturers
Vaughn Amann
Science Before the Storm
Technikon