Judicial White Privilege: A People's History Of American Jurisprudence: Recent Episodes
Peter Mark
This series is a social media companion of a collaborative book project with the same title. The book examines the court records and historic records and exposes American jurisprudence to the public as the very source of racial oppression and injustice as soon as colonialists imported English law from a single-race society (England) to a multiracial America. The host(s) will take calls, hear personal stories, answer questions, and bounce ideas on waging a nonviolent revolution to fundamentally change American justice system.
I did an episode "When Dumb Fucks Cluster Fuck". Here it goes again. https://youtu.be/ib8wFdj-Q2c
Is anti-police action an enterprise for profit or other economic advantage? Is police itself an organized crime enterprise where its members form protection rackets to protect each other?
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Four chefs in one kitchen. Eight hands in one cookie jar.
This is the only time in our nation's history when dumb fucks of criminal prosecution machine cluster-fuck.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
This is a personal account of how I was treated by an all-White CBP squad at Houlton, Maine border crossing around 11:20PM, August 13, 2023.
I am not the only one. https://www.bangordailynews.com/2023/08/11/news/aroostook/cyr-bus-line-maine-aclu-border-patrol-searches/
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
This is my third episode on Harvard Admission Policy. I called it a scheme of robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Well...the new controversy in the news, "Legacy Admission Policy", seems to suggest that Harvard Admission has robbed Peter to pay Paul while robbing Paul at the same time.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2023/07/25/study-of-elite-college-admissions-wealth-impact/70462656007/
https://youtu.be/G0Sa7bbzXEM https://youtu.be/wCwcHad9OlI
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2023/07/31/legacy-admissions-end-white-privilege-affirmative-action/70463694007/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2023/07/03/legacy-admissions-complaint-after-affirmative-action-ruling/70380084007/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2021/10/26/amherst-legacy-admissions-racial-exclusion/6175292001/?gnt-cfr=1
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
An exhibit of cultural genocide in Connectcut and Justice Neil Gorsuch's concurrence opinion in Haaland v. Brackeen.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
More on the Supreme Court decision on the Affirmative Action of Harvard Admission. Glenn Loury and John McWhorter, two prominent African American intellectuals, both benefited from Affirmative Action policies. Why do they agree with the Supreme Court's ruling on Harvard?
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Mirror mirror on the wall, who plays the race card the best in the world? Wink wink is it Harvard University, the most prestigious institute of PRIVILEGE in all shapes and colors?
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
I was asked to define "White" in "White Privilege". My first proposed definition is that "White" represents American inhabitants whose ancestry can be traced to the "civilized" nations on the Moral and Political Chart of the Inhabited World (circa 1827).
I have my second proposed definition. "White" is American pan-Europeanism.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
This is an open room to go back to the O.J. trial.
By comparing O.J. charged for killing two people to Trump charged for espionage we may be able to discuss three questions: (1) Has politics impacted the integrity of judicial proceedings in America? (2) Has racism impacted the integrity of judicial proceedings in America? and (3) Is racism the highest form of politics?
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Trump's return trip to the White House will go through the Supreme Court. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNb4XXesH7cDownload the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
The Durham Report and the "No Reasonable Prosecutor" Discretionhttps://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/05/fbi-director-james-comey-has-concluded-the-investigation-into-clintons-emails.htmlDownload the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
A condom...it is made for use in one occurrence and one occurrence only. You use it once, discard it, and forget about it. This topic is inspired by Jimmy Dore's take on the Trump Rape Trial.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOKlD8U39-sDownload the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
On the one year anniversary of the Supreme Court leak Justice Alito is on the offense.https://www.wsj.com/articles/justice-samuel-alito-this-made-us-targets-of-assassination-dobbs-leak-abortion-court-74624ef9White supremacists always claim that they are being victimized by non-Whites. Alito follows the same strategy. His decree disturbed peace and tranquility of this nation. But he claimed now he has been a victim. Is he?Full text:THE WEEKEND INTERVIEW Justice Samuel Alito: ‘This Made Us Targets of Assassination’The author of the Dobbs abortion ruling answers attacks on the court’s ‘legitimacy.’ He says he thinks he knows who leaked the draft and is certain about the motive.By James TarantoDavid B. Rivkin Jr.April 28, 2023 2:06 pm ETJustice Samuel Alito was supposed to speak to law students at George Mason University in Arlington, Va., but when they showed up, he wasn’t there. “That Alito was speaking via closed circuit from a room at the Supreme Court seven miles away, rather than in person, was a sign these are not normal times,” the Washington Post reported. The Post didn’t explain what made the “times” abnormal. It wasn’t a lingering fear of Covid-19. In a mid-April interview in his chambers, Justice Alito fills us in on the May 12, 2022, event: “Our police conferred with the George Mason Police and the Arlington Police and they said, ‘It’s not a good idea. He shouldn’t come here. . . . The security problems will be severe.’ So I ended up giving the speech by Zoom,” he says. “Still, there were so many protesters and they were so loud that you could hear them.”By now a noisy mob of law students may sound like any other school day, but last May also was a tumultuous time for the court. The preceding week, someone had leaked a draft of Justice Alito’s opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a landmark abortion case that wouldn’t be decided until late June. The last question at the George Mason event, the Post reported, was about how the justices were getting along in the wake of that unprecedented breach of confidentiality. At the time, Justice Alito said little in response beyond “we’re doing our work.”He now says that the leak “created an atmosphere of suspicion and distrust. We worked through it, and last year we got our work done. This year, I think, we’re trying to get back to normal operations as much as we can. . . . But it was damaging.” Chief Justice John Roberts directed the marshal of the Supreme Court to investigate the leak. In January she issued her findings: “Investigators have been unable to determine at this time, using a preponderance of the evidence standard, the identity of the person(s) who disclosed the draft majority opinion.”Justice Alito says the marshal “did a good job with the resources that were available to her” and agrees that the evidence was insufficient for a public accusation. “I personally have a pretty good idea who is responsible, but that’s different from the level of proof that is needed to name somebody,” he says. He’s certain about the motive: “It was a part of an effort to prevent the Dobbs draft . . . from becoming the decision of the court. And that’s how it was used for those six weeks by people on the outside—as part of the campaign to try to intimidate the court.” That campaign included unlawful assemblies outside justices’ homes, and that wasn’t the worst of it. “Those of us who were thought to be in the majority, thought to have approved my draft opinion, were really targets of assassination,” Justice Alito says. “It was rational for people to believe that they might be able to stop the decision in Dobbs by killing one of us.” On June 8, an armed man was arrested outside the home of Justice Brett Kavanaugh; the suspect was later charged with attempted assassination and has pleaded not guilty. A few pundits on the left speculated that the leaker might have been a conservative attempting to lock in the five-justice majority and overturn the constitutional right to abortion. “That’s infuriating to me,” Justice Alito says of the theory. “Look, this made us targets of assassination. Would I do that to myself? Would the five of us have done that to ourselves? It’s quite implausible.” He adds that “I don’t feel physically unsafe, because we now have a lot of protection.” He is “driven around in basically a tank, and I’m not really supposed to go anyplace by myself without the tank and my members of the police force.” Deputy U.S. marshals guard the justices’ homes 24/7. (The U.S. Marshals Service, a bureau of the Justice Department, is distinct from the marshal of the court, who reports to the justices and oversees the Supreme Court Police.) A federal law called Section 1507 makes it a crime to picket or parade “in or near” a federal judge’s residence “with the intent of influencing” him “in the discharge of his duty.” During a hearing last month, Attorney General Merrick Garland told Sen. Mike Lee (R., Utah) that the marshals have “full authority to arrest” violators of Section 1507. But according to training slides obtained by Sen. Katie Britt (R., Ala.), deputies on the justices’ residential details are told to enforce the law only as “a last resort to prevent physical harm to the Justices and/or their families.” Although the Supreme Court has held that the Constitution allows for reasonable restrictions on the time, place and manner of speech, the training slides indicate that the Justice Department believes it is unconstitutional to enforce Section 1507 absent “criminal threats and intimidation.” Regular protests outside the justices’ homes continue. In some ways this is an old story. Each side of the abortion debate has featured a vigorous protest culture since at least the 1970s, when the court decided Roe v. Wade. The last time it reconsidered Roe, the three-justice plurality opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) asserted that it would “subvert the Court’s legitimacy” to overturn a precedent while “under fire,” meaning subjected to public criticism. The losing side has even resorted to violence before: Antiabortion extremists assassinated four abortion doctors between 1993 and 2009.But as the court has grown more conservative in recent years, the left has stepped up the attacks on the court’s “legitimacy,” including character assassination of individual justices, with little objection from mainstream Democrats and plenty of help from the media. Justice Alito says “this type of concerted attack on the court and on individual justices” is “new during my lifetime. . . . We are being hammered daily, and I think quite unfairly in a lot of instances. And nobody, practically nobody, is defending us. The idea has always been that judges are not supposed to respond to criticisms, but if the courts are being unfairly attacked, the organized bar will come to their defense.” Instead, “if anything, they’ve participated to some degree in these attacks.” Judges are in a double bind: If they don’t respond, the attacks stand. If they do, they diminish the mystique on which judicial authority depends. Justice Alito demurs when we ask about “ethics” accusations against Justice Clarence Thomas from partisan media: “I’ll stay away from that.” But he does address a less-recent drama: “After Justice Kavanaugh was accused of being a rapist during his Senate confirmation hearings, he made an impassioned speech, made an impassioned scene, and he was criticized because it was supposedly not judicious, not the proper behavior for a judge to speak in those terms. I don’t know—if somebody calls you a rapist?” Those who throw the mud then disparage the justices for being dirty. “We’re being bombarded with this,” Justice Alito says, “and then those who are attacking us say, ‘Look how unpopular they are. Look how low their approval rating has sunk.’ Well, yeah, what do you expect when you’re—day in and day out, ‘They’re illegitimate. They’re engaging in all sorts of unethical conduct. They’re doing this, they’re doing that’?”It “undermines confidence in the government,” Justice Alito says. “It’s one thing to say the court is wrong; it’s another thing to say it’s an illegitimate institution. You could say the same thing about Congress and the president. . . . When you say that they’re illegitimate, any of the three branches of government, you’re really striking at something that’s essential to self-government.” Some of the attacks are more technical, such as those involving the “shadow docket.” That term, coined by a law professor less than a decade ago, refers to applications for emergency orders and summary decisions, which the justices handle quickly and without full briefing. Such matters often provoke disagreement within the court, such as a 2022 Alabama congressional redistricting case in which Justice Elena Kagan, joined by two colleagues, complained of “the scanty review this Court gives matters on its shadow docket.” Justice Alito finds these applications a nuisance. “They’re very disruptive. But what are we supposed to do? They are brought to us. The last administration brought a lot of them to us because a lot of its programs were enjoined. This administration is doing the same thing right now. The solicitor general has said that she’s likely to file an application here to stay the Fifth Circuit’s order in the case involving the—mifestiprone? However you pronounce the word.” It’s mifepristone, an abortion drug that a lower court had said the Food and Drug Administration erred in approving. Harlan Crow Is ‘Collateral Damage’ of a Smear Campaign Against Clarence ThomasIt’s April 13 when Justice Alito tells us: “I have to prepare for a sitting next week. The next two weeks we have arguments. I have to prepare for all of those cases. But when this comes in, I’m going to have to put all that aside and deal with it.” On April 14 the application reached Justice Alito in his capacity as circuit justice for the Fifth Circuit. He issued a temporary stay immediately and extended it on April 19. On April 21 the full court granted the stay, so that mifepristone will remain on the market pending further litigation. Justice Alito filed a written dissent from the order granting the stay. He cited past complaints about the shadow docket from Justices Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Amy Coney Barrett. “I did not agree with these criticisms at the time,” he wrote, “but if they were warranted in the cases in which they were made, they are emphatically true here.” The court’s attackers clearly seek to poison the well, but to what end? They sometimes proclaim unrealistic goals such as pressuring a disfavored justice to retire or removing him from office through impeachment. Sometimes they speak of packing or “expanding” the court—enacting legislation to create new seats that would immediately be filled by a Democratic president and Senate.That might become possible if the Democrats have a good election in 2024, although Franklin D. Roosevelt failed in 1937 with enormous majorities, and Joe Biden, with narrow ones in 2021, punted the idea to a committee. It also would open the door to retaliatory packing by a future Republican president and Congress. Justice Alito finds the whole notion appalling: “To change the size of the court just because you want to change the result in cases—that would destroy it. You want to talk about our legitimacy? That would destroy the perception that we’re anything other than a political body.” The threat to politicize the court can tempt justices to rule defensively—to take account of political ramifications and thereby politicize their own institution. The plurality explicitly did that in Casey, and some sitting justices have been accused of it in recent years. Justice Alito isn’t one of them.“ This is not a situation in which the right thing to do is different from the expedient thing to do, at least in the long term,” he says. The public “will have reason to question our legitimacy if they see that what we are doing is not following the Constitution and the laws, but we’ve got our finger to the wind”—he lofts a digit—“and we’re issuing decisions that nobody really believes represent our sincere thinking about the law, but are structured in a way to curry favor, avoid controversy or something like that.” Justice Antonin Scalia said something similar in his dissent in Casey: “The notion that we would decide a case differently from the way we otherwise would have in order to show that we can stand firm against public disapproval is frightening.” The careers of Justices Scalia and Alito, whose high-court service overlapped by slightly more than a decade, demonstrate the increasing aggressiveness of the left’s approach to the court. Scalia was confirmed 98-0 in 1986; Justice Alito’s 2006 vote was 58-42, with only four Democratic ayes. The former, the first Italian-American justice, was celebrated as an ethnic pioneer; the latter’s opponents belittled him with the bigoted portmanteau “Scalito,” which appears on a framed bumper sticker on his bookshelf, a confirmation keepsake. How did Scalia escape the opprobrium to which his younger colleagues and successors have been subjected? In part by dissenting often. “Nobody can say for sure,” Justice Alito says, “but I’m willing to bet he would have been on the side that has been so heavily criticized in all the controversial cases. His vote would have been there, and he would have been subjected to the same kind of criticism.” There’s little doubt that would have been true of Dobbs. “Some decisions,” Justice Alito says, “and I think that Roe and Casey fell in this category, are so egregiously wrong, so clearly wrong, that that’s a very strong factor in support of overruling them.” Scalia was even blunter in Casey: “We should get out of this area, where we have no right to be, and where we do neither ourselves nor the country any good by remaining.” “When you’re in dissent,” Justice Alito observes, “well, his ideas were amusing and interesting. He spoke at a lot of law schools and he was honored at law schools, but he wasn’t a threat, because those views were not prevailing on issues that really hit home.” Soon after Scalia’s death in 2016, one of those law schools even took his name—Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University. That’s where Justice Alito was unable to set foot six years later because “the security problems will be severe.” Mr. Taranto is the Journal’s editorial features editor. Mr. Rivkin practices appellate and constitutional law in Washington. He served at the Justice Department and the White House Counsel’s Office in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Justice Scalia wrote in his same-sex marriage dissent:"The substance of today's decree is not of immense personal importance to me. It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it is that rules me. Today's decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court."Justice Scalia forgot to mention the lifetime of "the Rulers".The Supreme Court to Americans is the King Charles III to the British. It rules Americans for life, whether you consent or not.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
AH YES. THE QUEEN of HER MAJESTIC CASTLE.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
A quick review of many legal controversies in the news since the start of this Judicial White Privilege Show. All of them prove my theory and therefore this episode is a victory lap. Is Clearance Thomas the house slave of the Supreme Court? Plus: MifepristoneUhuru IndictmentHunter Biden Trump suing Michael Cohen (for breach of contract)Jack Teixeira (Have you ever seen a non-White whistleblower?)Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
It is to hijack the forward path, to control the narrative, to white-wash, to virtue-signal, and to gerrymander the revolution.Malcolm X: “It's just like when you've got some coffee that's too black, which means it's too strong. What do you do? You integrate it with cream, you make it weak. But if you pour too much cream in it, you won't even know you ever had coffee. It used to be hot, it becomes cool. It used to be strong, it becomes weak. It used to wake you up, now it puts you to sleep.”Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
https://www.secretservice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/2023-01/usss-ntac-maps-2016-2020.pdfIn the report above, the U.S. government takes the approach of "threat behavior assessment". I would challenge the government to deep-dive the mass shootings with root cause analyses. Root cause analysis (RCA) is the process of discovering the root causes of problems in order to identify appropriate solutions. RCA assumes that it is much more effective to systematically prevent and solve for underlying issues rather than just treating ad hoc symptoms and putting out fires.Threat behaviors are symptoms, not causes. No justice, no peace.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
My friend Brady Crow says this Judicial White Privilege Show is the wokest of all wokes. What is woke? What is Woke Justice?Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
The Imperial Supreme Courthttps://harvardlawreview.org/2022/11/the-imperial-supreme-court/Supreme Court is "A guarantee of anarchy" and a "threat to the whole system"https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-guarantee-of-anarchy-law-professor-warns-supreme-court-is-a-threat-to-the-whole-system/ar-AA18zqSr?ocid=entnewsntp&cvid=a4357f806bb24d4789709f512546c0ea&ei=24https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/03/supreme-court-decisions-conservative-justices-dobbs/673347/Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Karen is a slang term for a white woman perceived as entitled or demanding beyond the scope of what is normal. The term is often portrayed in memes depicting white women who use their white privilege to demand their own way.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Long after the Civil War we still have slaves, i.e., house slaves. This episode is inspired by the death of Tyre Nichols and a song I heard on the radio 30+ years ago. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnlplHQqE3IDownload the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
As displayed in the Rosa Parks Museum, MLK says: "We are not seeking an end to segregation. That's a matter for the legislature and the courts. We feel that we have a plan within the law. All we are seeking is justice and a fair treatment in riding the buses."As heard in the Rosa Parks Museum, Parks once said to the effect that, among all segregations, the bus segregation is the worst. If the state conviction of Rosa Parks stands today, why has no governor ever pardoned her when she was still alive?Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Judicial White Privilege produces injustice. Injustice produces wars, endless wars. I will be the boots on the ground at Rage against the War Machine.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Another civil insurrectionist: A lower court judge suggests abortion might be protected by 13th Amendment despite Supreme Court ruling. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/06/supreme-court-abortion-ruling-questioned-by-judge.htmlDownload the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Injustice breeds violence. Violence breeds more violence.Towards the end of the celebration of the Chinese New Year of Rabbit, more war deaths abroad and at home. Plus, the current state of Civil Rights Memorial in Montgomery, Alabama is yet another perfect example of White-washed history of civil rights struggles.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
The genetics science behind the hate.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
In Year-End Report, Chief Justice Roberts Addresses Threats to Judges’ Safety. https://dnyuz.com/2022/12/31/in-year-end-report-chief-justice-roberts-addresses-threats-to-judges-safety/2022 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciaryhttps://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/year-end/2022year-endreport.pdfI hereby present the People's Report on 2022 Federal Judiciary.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Will "Browning the Bench" cure Judicial White Privilege? Rev. Al Sharpton believes so. He recently opines that, "To restore trust in Delaware’s courts, diversify the Supreme Court." https://www.delawareonline.com/story/opinion/2022/12/26/to-restore-trust-in-delawares-courts-diversify-the-supreme-court/69755208007/Actually, Rev. Sharpton cited a great case of Judicial White Privilege -- TransPerfect, a White-own business that was forced to be sold. Can the U.S. government force TikTok to be sold? Maybe.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Russians do have their own Christmas. The children in this clip are so cute. I would call this a separately celebrated but equally cute Christmas.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mub6kuvdu8For these White American children, 2023 starts with a big bang. I would like to talk about the White victims of Judicial White Privilege.https://www.eastidahonews.com/2023/01/southern-utah-man-kills-wife-5-children-and-mother-in-law-before-shooting-himself/This book sheds some lights on the root cause of intrafamilial mass shootings. https://www.amazon.com/Judicial-War-Men-Kindle-ebook/dp/B08232Y7TK/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2SXYQ2RC0R8Z9&keywords=judicial+war+on+men&qid=1673176465&sprefix=judicial+war+on+men%2Caps%2C241&sr=8-1These victims are not alone.https://www.cecildaily.com/news/victims-of-elk-mills-shooting-identified/article_db94ca85-6e9d-5984-87bb-92474fde2438.htmlhttps://nypost.com/2022/06/15/jason-karels-allegedly-drowned-his-kids-amid-divorce-proceedings/ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/sacramento-church-shooting-children-killed-b2025394.htmlhttps://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/after-manhunt-cops-arrest-man-wanted-in-5-killings-across-new-mexico-nj/2735858/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2021/04/10/los-angeles-mother-arrested-after-3-children-were-found-dead/7180051002/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/04/19/austin-shooting-police-search-suspect-stephen-nicholas-broderick/7282033002/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/04/16/ohio-bob-evans-shooting-waitress-dead-suspect-later-caught/7264000002/https://nypost.com/2021/04/22/arkansas-man-fatally-shoots-pregnant-wife-son-in-murder-suicide/https://www.nj.com/salem/2021/04/2-shot-to-death-in-south-jersey-home-in-apparent-murder-suicide.html?outputType=amphttps://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/22/us/edward-jake-wagner-murder.html?surface=most-popular&fellback=false&req_id=977886921&algo=bandit-all-surfaces-uh-lasttoday-alpha-01&variant=3_bandit-all-surfaces-uh-lasttoday-alpha-01&pool=pool/91fcf81c-4fb0-49ff-bd57-a24647c85ea1&imp_id=165823416https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/crime/2021/07/27/double-shooting-wilmington-claims-life-32-year-old-man/5382983001/https://nypost.com/2022/02/28/texas-family-found-dead-in-apparent-murder-suicide/Join me and share your thoughts.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
This is the Kennedy Space Center Episode.Mohammed Ali once said that he likes White people and he wants the Blacks to achieve what Whites have achieved...such as traveling to space.Is space a White-only endeavor?Is American space program becoming an endeavor for world peace or world wars? Is the U.S. Space Force making the Kennedy Space Center a military base?Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
How white is a Russian Christmas? Is the White Christmas in the West white enough? Will banning the Nutcracker give the West a WHITER Christmas?A segregated Christmas is indicative of a segregated Christianity that the West seems to be determined to maintain. Will a segregated Christianity make 2023 a WHITER world?Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Good Sunday Morning!Today I'll cover two interesting persons from the great state of Tennessee: 1. Jack Smith the indpendent prosecutor and 2. Dr. Arikana Chihombori-Quao, the former African Union Ambassador to the U.S. See her fiery presentation on Al Jazeera.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfLxnIqi4Uc&ab_channel=AlJazeeraEnglishDownload the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Yes! The "long arms" of Judicial White Privilege are all over these new developments: Twitter censorship, the student debt relief program stuck in courts, the prisoner swap between US and Russia, and the Minsk Accords as non-treaties.Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
An ethicist is one whose judgment on ethics and ethical codes has come to be trusted by a specific community, and is expressed in some way that makes it possible for others to mimic or approximate that judgment. Following the advice of ethicists is one means of acquiring knowledge about what that ethicist says.
Have you noticed recently that ethicists in the mainstream media are predominantly Whites? Here is one of White ethicists on the 60 Minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0j0xzuh-6rY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLfr7sU5W2E
What is wrong with that?
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Recap of the four militant women and the wrongs judicial White privilegists did to them.
The Supreme Court is about to end affirmative action, the only reparation remedy.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
For today, abortion rights, gun rights, and skin colors, are all in the mix.. Come join the discussions.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
The official great replacement theory of the European Union (White Nations' Union)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVcyvq0VSL8&ab_channel=RolandS.Martin
Tucker Carlson's warning of an upcoming genocide of Whites
https://youtu.be/mNGsZ5I2juA
A ungrateful black man toward a White award.
https://www.fox9.com/news/when-he-accepted-a-medal-from-saint-paul-police-alex-mingus-had-one-message-we-keep-us-safe
Under whose law do we determine "lawlessness"?
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Putin is a lawyer. Joe Biden is also a lawyer. When lawyers have decided to rely on violence to settle their differences, as is the case in Ukraine, it proves that lawyers themselves know that there is no functioning justice system. It is always for ordinary people to suffer and die in senseless violence. Is the world heading for World War III? Is the United States heading toward Civil War II?
Another mass shooting by a very young person in Raleigh, North Carolina. Our society and the world are made of bullies and there is no justice system to stop bullies, except a gun?
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
More critical theories came out of the Dobbs decision and Iran's "Morality Police". Sharia law has its morality mandates. So does Christianity, which bans abortions and assisted suicides. Is the Supreme Court the "Morality Police" of Christianity? Should We-the-People's government enforce morality mandates of any religion (especially on women)?
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
For all of us who provide a viable alternative to the mainstream media and the profiteering corporate media, we run the risk of being labelled as spreaders of disinformation.
It is one thing if YouTube/Twitter/FaceBook cancel you. It is entirely another matter if the FBI runs a disinformation board to influence YouTube/Twitter/FaceBook to suppress your contents. Before the DHS conceived and then abandoned the "Disinformation Governance Board", the FBI counterintelligence already runs "Disinformation" routines.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
In honor of the UN week the Judicial White Privilege Show goes international. Absence of a legally sound and operationally sustainable global justice system caused and continues to cause wars and in-nation mass-killings. No justice, no peace. It is true domestically and globally.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
I am honored to have Amanda Rice join this episode. Like Howard Zinn's People's History of the U.S.A, this show is about the losers in front of Judicial White Privilegists. Women are the recent losers on the Supreme Court in the Dobbs decision. What, then, can the losers do? Can American women make ERA ratification the Women's Counter-Dobbs Revolution? Join us for a revolutionary discussion.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Is Trump a victim of White Privilege AGAIN???!!!
What is the reputational harm to Trump because of the Mar-a-Lago raid? Look no further to the MLK rape tapes.
Plus, Chesa Boudin on the Katie Halper Show. Is he the "White Knight" after all?
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
A policy of deliberate ambiguity is the practice by the U.S. government of being intentionally ambiguous on certain aspects of its foreign policy. It may be useful if the country has contrary foreign and domestic policy goals or if it wants to take advantage of risk aversion to abet a deterrence strategy.
Domestically, the U.S. court has deliberately used its own "Strategic Ambiguity" to deter racial minorities' struggles for their rightfully full citizenship and long overdue equal standing.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
The African People's Socialist Party gets nearly zero coverage by the national MSM after its office and its leader's home were raided by the FBI. While Trump is sucking up all the MSM oxygen for his FBI raid, let's talk more about the pan-Africanist organization, the deeply rooted racial bias of the FBI, and the long standing inner workings of a colonialist justice system. After all, J. Edgar Hoover is the most infamous crossdresser of justice of the FBI.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Who mistrusts or distrusts the Whites in government the most? Not the Native People, not the Blacks, not the Hispanics, or the Asians. It is the White People, i.e., the Founding Fathers. The Founding Fathers called it "tyranny of the majority".
Judicial White privilege is a form of the white majoritarian democracy, a tyrannic abuse of power against racial minorities.
Merrick Garland was the chief judge of the D.C. Circuit Court, second only to the Supreme Court. As his DOJ continues to drag its feet in pressing charges against Hunter Biden for multiple federal offenses, and as Merrick Garland himself personally approved the “espionage” investigation of Donald Trump, tens of millions of American whites consider Merrick Garland the postboy of two-tiered justice system.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
In the 2022-05-08 episode, I explained how the Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu unlawfully expanded national security authority over domestic targets. During the Trump presidency, the Deep State, a.k.a. the national security oligarchs of unelected bureaucrats, out-trumped Trump as a sitting president.
Now Trump is a private citizen, he will be subject to trump-up charges by prosecutors like any other ordinary person, especially racial minorities. It is the Supreme Court that established qualified immunity for corrupt cops. It is also the Supreme Court that established absolute prosecutorial immunity to protect corrupt prosecutors.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
When a democracy follows a religion's teaching, it becomes a theocracy. Alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine are substances for happiness. When a government bans substances of happiness, it just may be doing the teaching church's work.
"Pursuit of happiness" and "all men are created equal" are written in the Declaration of Independence. But the US government used to ban alcohol. It continues to ban marijuana and cocaine, which Hunter Biden enjoys in pursuit of his happinesses.
If viagra is men's legal substances for happiness, should abortion drugs be treated the same? When a state bans abortions, can it also ban abortion drugs?
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
The American abortion controversy is a complex one, I therefore will break it down into pieces for easier digestion.
The first piece: With HIPAA prohibiting wrongful disclosure of any person's medical records, how will the abortion-banning states determine the viability of fertilized eggs without violating the federal law?
HIPAA is pro-"choice". The word "choice" means something different. Read this publication by Health and Human Services (HHS). Tune in and find out more!
https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/special/healthit/individualchoice.pdf
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
By suddenly reversing Roe v. Wade the Supreme Court of the United States sucker-punched We-the-People, especially female Americans. Now it’s our turn to pick up the pieces, to educate ourselves, to strategize, and to fight back.
The Dobbs decision is exactly what Justice Antonin Scalia had insisted: the abortion issue belongs to individual states. Is Scalia right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rj_MhS2u-Pk
Regarding Roe v. Wade Alan Dershowitz, the Harvard Law professor emeritus, contends that the Supreme Court actually weakened the abortion-rights movement with its Roe v. Wade ruling. Is Dershowitz right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yAcf-S1wEU
The upcoming Dobbs Decision episodes of the Judicial White Privilege Show are all about broadcasting enlightenment ideas to those whose sacred and unalienable right just suffered a tragic blow. Due to the complexity of each episode a preview of the five episode is in order.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
UNITED STATES v. VAELLO MADERO https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-303_6khn.pdf
Justice Gorsuch: "A century ago in the Insular Cases, this Court held that the federal government could rule Puerto Rico and other Territories largely without regard to the Constitution. It is past time to acknowledge the gravity of this error and admit what we know to be true: The Insular Cases have no foundation in the Constitution and rest instead on racial stereotypes. They deserve no place in our law".
Justice Sotomayor: "There is no rational basis for Congress to treat needy citizens living anywhere in the United States so differently from others. To hold otherwise, as the Court does, is irrational and antithetical to ... the equal protection of citizens guaranteed by the Constitution".
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
"Leaker" is a slang term for a fart that turns out to be an unanticipated watery shit leak. Leaking the context of this slang is associated with an old age person who is losing bodily control functions and brain functions. The Supreme Court is losing it and now the jokes are on the Supreme Court!
The trick of Judicial White Privilege is to change a law by ignoring the statutory languages of the controlling laws or by changing procedural rules while administering justice, when the court pursues a political agenda. The practice equates changing the rules of the game amidst of the game, changing the goal posts in the middle of a football game. It creates jurisprudential incoherence. The Leaker Investigation is an ultimate example of jurisprudential incoherence.
In this episode, I will take a deeper dive on the Supreme Court leaker investigation comparing it to Riley v. California. The jurisprudential incoherence here is how the Supreme Court treats its own employees worse than the State of California treated a gang member.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/13-132
When lawmakers begged for presidential pardons, the lawmakers knew they probably broke law(s).
https://thehill.com/news/house/3506938-gop-bill-would-criminalize-supreme-court-leaks/
When lawmakers try to make "the Leaker Accountability Act" to punish the Supreme Court leaker, the lawmakers know that the leaking of a draft opinion of the
Supreme Court is not a crime unless they make one and make it retroactive.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3535131-at-least-four-house-gop-lawmakers-asked-for-pardons-after-jan-6/
Does the Supreme Court need an existing law to investigate the leaker? Yes, the Constitution requires the Supreme Court to do so.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
The history of Judicial White Privilege is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations against racial minorities in a nation born multiracial.
On July 3, 2022, in celebration of the First American Revolution, let us re-image America without Judicial White Privilege. Let us re-declare our independence from racial inequality.
In United States Declaration of Independence, “Rights”, “Laws”, and “Justice” are written, referenced, and pronounced in 26 places, from A to Z.
The Founders condemned the King of Great Britain guilty of a history of repeated injuries and usurpations against “We the People” in violation of “the Laws”, of natural, of divinity, domestic, and foreign. The history of Judicial White Privilege is a repeat of that of the King of Great Britain.
In this special episode celebrating America, let us be enlightened again by these words of wisdom, apply them to see through Judicial White Privilege, and devote ourselves to the Second American Revolution for Racial Equality.
A: “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”
B: “all men are created equal”
C: “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights”
D: “to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”
E: “it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it”
F: “most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness”
G: “it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security”
H: “a history of repeated injuries and usurpations”
I: “Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good”
J: “pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance”
K: “refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature”
L: “legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures”
M: “invasions on the rights of the people”
N: “obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners”
O: “obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers”
P: “made Judges dependent on his Will alone”
Q: “the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power”
R: “subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution”
S: “For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States”
T: “depriving us ... of the benefits of Trial by Jury”
U: “transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences”
V: “For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws”
W: “Suspending our own Legislature”
X: “We have Petitioned for Redress”
Y: “their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us”
Z: “appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world”
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, the Supreme Court did not find the "Rights of Man" in women. Nor did the court see the "Rights of Man" in Puerto Ricans and Japanese Americans.
The Constitution protects the "Rights of Man" except when the Supreme Court looked at Puerto Ricans and Japanese Americans under the doctrine of "whether the Constitution follows the flag". Specifically, when there is a foreign policy need or a military need, should the Supreme Court follow the Constitution, or follow the American Flag?
The jurisprudential incoherence is that in Texas v. Johnson, the Court voted 5-4 in favor of Gregory Lee Johnson, the protester who had burned the American flag. In the Insular cases, the Court followed the flag over the Constitution. Why did a Flag-following court in the Insular Cases support flag-burning? The joke is on the Supreme Court: You don't follow a symbol you agree to be burned! If a Puerto Rican burns an American flag in Puerto Rico, can the U.S. government legally permitted to summarily execute the flag-burner?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downes_v._Bidwell
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Johnson
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Judicial White Privilege is a HUGELY important topic. Let's take a break and recapitulate.
PLUS: a simulcast of Callin and ZOOM for all you social podcasters out there!
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Thomas Paine is a bad-ass revolutionist even by today's standard. By reputation he and John Quincy Adam are the two members of the Founding Fathers never owning a slave.
Thomas Paine is one of the greatest critical theorists. Unlike John Locke and other scholars of the times, Thomas Paine is a common man who popularized the concept of human rights and American independence. Paine's publications were so provocative that he had to use a pseudonym for his series called "Common Sense", an easy-to-read pamphlet of essays that educate ordinary people why a break-way from the British monarchy is of natural rights and consequences.
Rights of Man is one of Thomas Paine's publications. He advocated that
-
"Rights are inherently in all the inhabitants."
-
Laws "leave the right...in the hands of a few...they consequently are instruments of injustice."
In this episode, we will take a look at the rights of "other" inhabitants in these American "establishments" along the timeline of American democracy.
The Inhabitants of the Reservations
The Inhabitants of the Plantations
The Inhabitants of the Segregated Communities and Facilities
The Excluded Chinese Inhabitants
The Inhabitants of the Territories
The Inhabitants of the Internment camps and Inhabitants of the Aleutian Islands
The Inhabitants of the Mass Incarceration Facilities
How did the courts rule on the "Rights of Man" of "other" inhabitants in these American "establishments"? Did the courts follow the Constitution?
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Amy Wax is currently a Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School. As an Assistant to the Solicitor General in the Office of the Solicitor General at the U.S. Department of Justice in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Wax argued 15 cases before the United States Supreme Court.
Amy Wax has an impeccable education. 1976-1981 M.D. cum laude with distinction in neuroscience, Harvard Medical School 1980-1981 First year student, Harvard Law School 1985-1987 Second and third year student, Columbia Law School, J.D., May 1987
In this episode of the Judicial White Privilege Show, we go inside Amy Wax by examining a White elitist's thoughts on Blacks and Asians.
"Race, Wrongs, and Remedies Group Justice in the 21st Century" by Amy Wax https://www.amazon.com/Race-Wrongs-Remedies-Politics-Economics/dp/0742562867
The "Great Replacement Theory" by Amy Wax
Amy Wax Tucker Carlson - Race baiting against Hindu Americans - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFP4uG7PsEM&t=77s&ab_channel=KazL
UPenn law professor accused of making hateful remarks about Asian immigrants - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Xi0FQSQJB4&t=15s&ab_channel=FOX29Philadelphia
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe has appeared dozens of times before the Supreme Court, and also published numerous books about the Constitution and the Court’s history. In the wake of the leaked draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturning Roe v. Wade, Professor Lawrence Tribe came out and pronounced the court's history of protecting the powerful. Check this New Yorker article.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/the-supreme-courts-history-of-protecting-the-powerful
In addition, Professor Tribe criticized some effort of concealment of a Noble Lie that the Supreme Court is an apolitical institution.
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2022/03/10/politicians-in-robes-justice-breyer-tribe/
I will go over some fascinating perspectives shared by Professor Tribe about the court's history. The court's history of protecting the powerful is exactly the history of American jurisprudence.
Majoritarianism is a traditional political philosophy or agenda that asserts that a majority (sometimes categorized by religion, language, social class, or some other identifying factor) of the population is entitled to a certain degree of primacy in society, and has the right to make decisions that affect the society.
Judicial White Privilege is a form of White Majoritarianism. Courts operate as a political expedient to protect the Majoritarian oppressors' property interests and to keep the oppressed at bay.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Maurice Barres and ethnic nationalism
Ethnic wars in Europe among European ethnicities.
Colonialism the original great replacement.
America is multi-racial by white men's design.
Civil Rights and the "Great Reverse Replacement".
Amy Wax's theory on immigration and remedies for racial wrongs.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Historian Holly Brewer tweeted that Justice Alito's majority opinion “reminds me of Dred Scott (1857)”. See www.randomlengthsnews.com/archives/2022/05/12/the-illegitimate-court/
If the Supreme Court resurrects Dred Scott, are the majority justices law-breakers themselves?
Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, in which the Court allowed the use of wiretapped private telephone conversations without judicial approval and the use of collected information as evidence. Justice Louis Brandeis in his dissenting opinion made a prediction: “Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for the law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy”.
Since then, there have been insurrections (violent) and civil insurrections (non-violent). The leaking of the Supreme Court opinion reversing Roe v. Wade is another act of civil disobedience at the highest level.
Violence Insurrections:
Slave Revolts John Brown's Raid Timothy McVeigh's Bombing January 6 Riot
Civil Insurrections:
Ableman v. Booth Daniel Ellsberg, the Pentagon Papers Jane Fonda's War on Vietnam Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI The Deep Throat of the Watergate Affair Edward Snowden of NSA The leaker of the Supreme Court on the Proposed Opinion Overturning Roe v Wade
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Do chickens come home to roost? Yes!
Judicial White privilege has its unintended consequences. During World War II the Supreme Court upheld the national security authority to mass incarcerate domestic citizens of Japanese ancestry in Korematsu v. United States.
Since the Korematsu decision, a series of legal theories were developed by J. Edgar Hoover, Dick Chaney, John Yoo, Alberto Gonzalez, and many others to support the establishment and funding of the national security "Deep State", a.k.a. "intelligence communities" of the "DC Swamp".
Did the Trump presidency drain the swamp? Of course not. Today, American courts, including but not limited to the FISA court, remain instruments of the national security authority that is a clear and present danger threatening civil liberties of all Americans.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Take the Fifth: (in the US) exercise the right, guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, of refusing to answer questions in order to avoid incriminating oneself.
Judicial White privilegists are the sneakiest scumbags who know how to take away your right to take the fifth, especially when you are black. Check out the case of Bill Cosby and the case of Francis Rawls. Keep in mind that these are not some old Jim Crow cases. They both happened recently and in Philadelphia, the birthplace of American democracy, a.k.a. a government of the legislative White privilegists, the executive White privilegists, and the judicial White privilegists.
Bill Cosby https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Cosby
Francis Rawls https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/173205p.pdf
Then, let us find out what happened to this White "Bill Cosby" -- Judge William C. Bradley, who are sexually into teenage boys and collecting state pension for being a judge. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWAYJxSlqr4
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
Recent Events: The FBI stopped investigating me. Scott Ritter called International Criminal Court as a tool of "quasi-colonialism". Purto Ricans denied SSI benefits by the Supreme Court.
Talking Points: English law in other colonial territories. The United States as the super colonial power. A capitalist justice system is an oxymoronic concept. Race as a defense strategy in criminal proceedings.
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com
In the legislative branches, the White privilege is a seen or unseen discretionary power exercised by the White majority and its proxies, driven by overt or unconscious racial bias, to make laws that favor the White majority at the expense of racial minorities.
In the executive branches, the White privilege is a seen or unseen discretionary power exercised by the White majority and its proxies, driven by overt or unconscious racial bias, to enforce laws through customs or policies or manners that favor the White majority at the expense of racial minorities.
In the judicial branches, the White privilege is a seen or unseen discretionary power exercised by the White majority and its proxies, driven by overt or unconscious racial bias, to administer justice in manners that deprive racial minorities of their constitutional rights and privileges.
The three tiers of White privileges operate independently from each other or co-operate with each other.
In this inaugural episode, let us discuss the nexus of judicial white privilege and black rage shootings. Bring your knowledge about Frank R. James (2022), Anthony Ferrill (2020), Christopher Jordan Dorner (2013), Omar Sheriff Thornton (2010), and Colin Ferguson (1993). We will close the episode with some thoughts on James Urban Ruppert (1975) and Margaret Garner (1856).
Download the Callin app for iOS and Android to listen to this podcast live, call in, and more! Also available at callin.com