Comedian of Law: Recent Episodes
Joel Oster, Comedian of Law
Learn & Laugh with the Comedian of Law.
Joel Oster reviews legal happenings, Supreme Court cases and other legal news, all with a healthy dose of humor.
Chris and Joel discuss the legality and ethics of using a term and condition of viewing Disney movies with waiving your right to litigate a wrongful death. While there might be some legal arguments in favor of such waivers, will the collateral damage be too much for Disney?
The Democrats usurp the primary season with ease in appointing their candidate. Is this the waive of the future or a one-off? Chris and Joel analyze where the parties go from here.
Assuming Biden wanted another term in the White House, who thought having him do an early debate was a good idea? If Biden is wondering who stabbed him in the back, his Brutus, he need look no further that who recommended the early debate. Joe - you wanted the early bird special at Golden Corral, not the early bird prime time nationally televised debate.
But seeing as this debate was a debacle for Biden that absolutely everyone saw coming, why did Donald, the artist of the deal, agree to the early debate? I hate to point this out to you Trump supporters, but Trump got dumped on this one. Here, Donald was Charlie Brown acting surprised that Lucy pulled the football away. Donald - everyone saw this coming. Why didn't you?
Finally, Christ and Joel unpack the wacky case of the week where a court decided whether you, as a consumer, can expect bones in your boneless chicken wings.
In a moment for the history books, President Trump was shot in the ear and he has our nation's immigration problems to thank for saving his life. The would be assassin ha\d Trump in his crosshairs, but as he was pulling the trigger, Trump turned his head to look at an immigration map. That head turn was the difference between brain splatter and ear wax getting on a bullet.
Questions abound. For starters, why was an assassin allowed on a rooftop within 1000 yards of the president? If I had been contacted the morning of the event and asked to lead the security detail, I would have thought to secure an adjacent rooftop in direct eyesight to the president. Second, there is video tape of people recording the President's speech where you could hear people talking about the assassin and wondering what he was doing on the rooftop. If this story-line were in a movie, I would have turned it off for being too stupid to be believable.
But maybe most importantly, who created that immigration map? That person just saved Trump's life.
Chris and Joel unpack this historic moment.
Speaking of shooting, Alec Baldwin's accidental shooting trial was dismissed with prejudice after the prosecution played hide-the-evidence with the defense.
For the first time in recorded history, a presidential debate between the two major parties took place prior to the conventions. The reason? To give one side enough time to recover. Even CNN and MSNBC was calling Biden's performance a debacle. Chris and Joel unpack what options the Democratic party have.
It is Supreme Court sweeps season - which means its time to knock off old precedents. The biggest one to fall this term was the Chevron doctrine. Chris and Joel unpack why this is a major decision that will impact everyone's life.
The murder scene was as graphic as your imagination would allow. Four members of the Clutter family, all hog tied and gagged, were laying with shotgun blasts to the head. The father, Herb Clutter, had his throat slit as well.
This discovery began journey for justice as portrayed in Truman Capote’s book In Cold Blood. Does the title describe the manner in which the murders occurred? Or the legal system that rushed to take the lives of the defendants?
In this episode, Chris and Joel unpack the scene, the suspects, and the big break.
The murder of the Clutter family is one of the most gruesome murders in Kansas history. Four family members died by a shotgun blast to the head in the middle of the night on a farm in western Kansas. Truman Capote chronicled the investigation, arrest, trial and execution of the defendants for this heinous act.
But did the legal system get it right? Joel and Chris unpack this true crime and puts the legal system on trial.
The jury has spoken and found Trump guilty on all 34 counts. What's next for the leading candidate to be our next president? Will Riker's Island have to make room for oval furniture? Chris and Joel discuss the next steps for Trump.
Plus Chad Daybell gets the death penalty for his role in the murders of his ex wife and his second wife's kids. Which is a bit odd. Because the evidence shows that it is more likely that his second wife was responsible for the murders of her kids, but she didn't get the death penalty.
Nevertheless, it was a week of juries speaking and speaking loudly.
Gayle Bergstrand was an ear witness to a murder. Being just inches away, she was awoken in the middle of the night to a loud sound next door. Gayle and her husband lived in one-half of a duplex, and on the other side, lived the Harmons. But in the middle of the night, she heard a loud sound coming from the Harmon’s side of the duplex. So she wakes her husband with the all-too-familiar-question to husbands: “did you hear that?” You know what the husband said. Husbands all across America know what he said. But Gayle was right to be concerned. Hear her tail of what happened when you are an ear-witness to murder.
Trump Trial week 3 didn’t disappoint. From threatening President Trump with jail to putting a porn star under oath to talk about details, it was a surreal courtroom experience. Plus Joel covers a crazy case where a lawyer's parents actually caught on fire. Some jokes just write themselves.
It’s week 2 of the Trump Trial, and this made-for-reality TV courtroom drama did not disappoint. The judge fined Trump $9,000 for violating his gag order to not speak about witnesses or judicial staff. To which Trump responded – “that’s the best $9,000 worth of air-time I have ever spent!”
While Trump was fined for speaking about the prosecution’s witnesses, mainly Michael Cohen, Cohen was busy on TikTok blasting Trump, and making money while doing it. People were worried that this would hurt Cohen’s credibility until they realized he had none to begin with.
We go back through our annuls to highlight the time Constanza sued Jerry Seinfeld. Not George. But Michael Constanza. Think about that. Under penalty of perjury, Michael Constanza told the court that he was the inspiration for the balding, overweight, ultimate loser, can’t-keep-a-job, and can’t-keep-a-date George Constanza. The things we will do for $200,000,000.
Finally, the Supreme Court heard argument in the presidential immunity case. Turns out, the justices have been listening to our podcast as they asked questions dove-tailing with our pre-argument analysis. The issue will be whether Trump was acting in his personal or presidential capacity. But both Chris and Joel are in agreement that the Court’s ruling will likely push any trial over the January 6th matter past the election date.
Week one of Trump's trial didn’t disappoint. First, the court held a hearing on whether Trump should be sanctioned for violating the gag order. But the maximum fine is 1,000 per violation. Even if Trump has to pay the maximum, that’s some great ROI for his Marketing efforts.
Former National Enquirer took the stand to testify about the catch-and-kill approach with Trump stories. Somewhere Elvis and Marilyn Monroe are spinning on their graves. They could have killed their Martian love child story if they had just ponied up!
The Juice has passed away, so let the jokes begin. Good taste? Bad taste? If he committed double murder, who cares? Chris and Joel take this opportunity to remember one of the biggest trials in history.
And at the same time, a trial that could trump the OJ trial just began. I think we can all agree that if a trial ends up imprisoning a former president of the United States and the leader in the polls to be the next president, that will go down in history. Hold on to your seats.
As this is Easter week, we explore one of the most significant trials in history – the trial of Jesus. And aside of the theological implications of this trial, this trial has impacted our legal systems today. From our concept of cruel and unusual punishment, to due process, to separation of church and state issues, this case has a lot of current appllications.
And Trump is back in court. Or - is it that he has never been out of court? But a NY appellate court gave Trump some reprieve by reducing the amount he has to post as bond to appeal the verdict.
And finally, gambling is back in baseball. From the black sox scandal to Pete Rose, there is a long storied tradition of betting and American’s former national pastime. Shohei Otani’s betting scandal is just getting started.
Ruby Franke and her business partner Jodi Hildebrandt were sentenced to up to 30 years in prison for child abuse. The actual time she will spend behind bars will be determined by the Utah Parole Board. Chris unpacks what that actually means.
Fani Willis is in big trouble. Joel is convinced she perjured herself on the stand. If she were married and did what she did, no partner would buy her story. You don't go over to someone's house at midnight, stay until the morning, and then claim to be working on a file. That doesn't pass anyone's smell test. If she was willing to perjure herself on the stand to prosecute Trump, then what does this say about her objectivity?
Finally, in our true crime series, we focus on the trial of Jesus. With Easter week approaching, Chris and Joel dig in to one of the most talked about, consequential trial on the millennia. This will be a two part series. In Part 1, we discuss the political climate for this trial as well as the dual legal systems that brought the matter to court.
A unanimous Supreme Court ruled that Colorado cannot kick a presidential candidate off of a ballot. Which begs the question – what exactly were these Colorado judges thinking? That each individual state can boot off it’s political enemy from a national election? Do these judges not have any ability to anticipate bad consequences? If your ruling on a political hot button issue results in a 9-0 beat down from the U.S. Supreme Court, that calls into question whether you should still possess car keys.
Also, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Trump’s presidential immunity case. While this case presents a fascinating question as to whether a president is liable for acts committed while president, the real issue here is timing. By taking the case, will the clock run out on this case before the election?
In sports, the Denver Broncos announced they will waive Russ Wilson, ending what could be considered the greatest bust in NFL history. This might top the SF 49’ers trading for an injured OJ Simpson, the Vikings trading half their draft picks for years to the Cowboys for Hershel Walker, and the Bears decision to draft Mitch Trubisky over Mahomes. If you are asking, “who is Mitch Trubisky?” – exactly.
The Chiefs are now officially a dynasty. But where do they rank among the other dynastic NFL champs? Of course, the Chiefs are still adding to their case.
While Kyle Shanahan messed up gloriously by electing to take the ball in OT, he still finished ahead of 30 other NFL head coaches.
Finally, the Chiefs celebration turned sour when gun shots rang out at the conclusion of the parade. Chris and Joel discuss where the Chiefs hold some moral responsibility by fostering a drunk fest with over a million in attendance.
The only issue left in the Trump Ballot case is whether the decision will be 9-0 or 8-1. But regardless, the Court was in agreement that political mayhem will ensue if each state were allowed to cast off a presidential candidate. I sense an insurance commercial here somewhere. But one thing is certain – politics tends to follow the circling of the drain approach. Once one state is allowed to throw out the opposing political party’s leading candidate, the others will follow as our presidential elections just continue to circle the drain.
Special Counsel Robert Hur found that although there was evidence that Vice President Joe Biden disclosed classified documents illegally, he did not recommend charges as no jury would convict an elderly senile dementia patient. What?!?
And finally, the 49’ers square off against the Swifties in the Super Bowl this Sunday. While Chris and Joel both have their childhood teams playing in this game, they apply reason and logic in debating the important issues. For example, will Travis Kelce be distracted if his mom is left out of a million-dollar suite while his girlfriend has an entire entourage in her suite? But Joel predits why and how both teams can win.
If you are sick of Patrick Mahomes, Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift, well, sucks to be you. Because KC is going to the Super Bowl again! The Super Bowl is being played in the Raider's stadium in Las Vegas, which means the Chiefs will be playing a playoff game in Raider's stadium before the Raiders.
While KC is on a roll, the 49'ers have the superior team. While KC only has 4 Pro-Bowl players on its active roster, the 49'ers have 9. This game highlights the realities when you start a QB in his prime as compared to a QB on a rookie contract. The 49'ers have a lot more money to play other star players.
Trump was found liable for defaming Jean Carroll by claiming she lied in claiming he raped her over twenty years ago. Joel and Chris debate the ramifications if this jury award is allowed to stand. Now, no one on a losing side of a lawsuit can ever speak their mind about that lawsuit. Or, is this outcome explainable by saying it's the Trump effect?
What kind of a fan are you? Discussing the levels of jerky fans.
A class action suit was brought against NFL on to uphold the anti-trust law by giving exclusive rights to a certain streaming platform.
Our wacky case of the week; a man is suing 27 women from a dating site because they bashed him online.
Trump is getting sued again for defamation- what a great campaign strategy to stay in the news FREE PRESS.
What does “The Deep State” actually mean? We go over the options.
Donald Trump wants to give closing remarks in his trial. Is his lawyer that stupid? He is also leading the polls going into Iowa. How will Nikki Haley do after Chris Christie withdrew?
NFL Black Monday- Who left, who stayed, and is anyone moving teams? Moving into Playoff week, what are the top matches, and who will be left standing in week 2?
The coveted Jeffrey Epstein list was released, and ... was well, rather boring.
Joel makes his case for a Trials of the Centuries Hall of Fame. What trials will be nominated, what is the criteria, and is the induction night going to be black tie? Will OJ or Johnny Depp attend?
It's an underdog year in the NFL and the playoffs are around the corner. Joel and Chris gives their predictions during Courtroom Quarterback.
When should Christmas music start playing?
The Colorado Supreme Court removes Trump from ballot, will it stick? Chris and Joel have their biggest disagreement yet over the insurrection.
And it's all about Football and how it will shake out.
The Republican Debates are turning into the bully on the playground. Can we just cut off the mics at 60 seconds? The Sackler Family wants to step up in the payoff since Purdue Pharma is in bankruptcy and the government wants to intervene. And what is happening with the College Football Playoff Records when Chris agrees with Ron DeSantis?
It's turkey time! If you are looking for a way to prepare your turkey, Joel offers tips on smoking your turkey to perfection.
Speaking of getting smoked, the Chiefs are in trouble. But is it fixable? Joel and Chris debate.
Finally, the NCAA is in real legal trouble. Due to their blatant violation of the anti-trust laws, now former players are seeking damages for lost NIL opportunities. And the preliminary numbers are staggering - the NCAA is facing a 4.7 billion dollar judgement. Couldn't have happened to a nice group of people.
The Supreme Court adopted an ethics code. Don't get too excited. Apparently, it's just a written down variation of the rules it was already following, which includes no enforcement mechanisms. But Joel explains why this is still a big deal.
Also concerning to Joel was whether Taylor Swift would be able to make it to the Super Bowl considering she will be performing a concert in Tokyo the day before. Christ reassures Joel that indeed, Taylor can make it back in time.
And Chis and Joel explain the legal process of obtaining a TRO, which helps to explain why Harbaugh is still not coaching.
The writers come off strike and immediately we get Trump testifying on the stand in NYC. Tell me our political world is not really Saturday Night Live comedy hour! As for the merits of the case, Joel and Chris debate whether fraud occurred as no bank would rely on a self-assessed valuations of property when giving a half billion dollar loan.
Mike Johnson was in the news again. Vanity Fair thought the new speaker was concealing assets by not turning over financial documents showing his wealth. Turns out he didn't disclose any documents as he didn't have any documents. He is paycheck to paycheck, just the 99% of us.
The Big 10 is about to punish the University of Michigan and its head coach Jim Harbaugh for its involvement in the sign-stealing gate. Joel questions how involved the University could really have been in Sign-gate as the coach in question bought all of these tickets in his own name. If Michigan were involved in planning Sign-gate, then they need to refund everyone the cost of their diplomas as they must be absolutely worthless. No one robs a bank after signing in their name first.
It's Halloween week. Do you dress your pets up?
We have a new speaker of the house, Mike Johnson. Is he an extremist or just a God-fearing, middle-American politician?
NFL bullies Houston college team on wearing powder blue uniforms. Does anyone even remember the Houston Oilers?
The Trump chronicles just keeps rolling. Is Mark Cohen a viable witness?
Jenna Ellis, Trump's former attorney, has taken a plea deal in the Fulton County RICO trial. These plea deals guarantee that the prosecution will have witnesses to call that will truthfully say what Trump was told and what Trump did. But what these plea deals do not do is magically transform the charges into actual crimes. No matter how bad the politically motivated DA wishes otherwise, challenging an election with a hail Mary legal argument is not a criminal enterprise.
If anyone takes a plea that includes jail time, then that person is just an idiot. But so far, these pleas have not included jail time, and so are really pleas of convenience.
Joel just got back from a trip to Springfield where he tried his hand at being a sleuth - an ace investigator doing a true crimes podcast. Unfortunately, this true crime happened over 150 years ago. But since the attorney was Honest Abe Lincoln, and was his last murder trial before accepting the Republican nomination for President, it's kind of a big deal.
And finally, we unpack the conclusion of the Harmon murder trial. Was justice done? Or is this a result of prosecutorial trickery?
Sidney Powell takes a plea deal in the Georgia RICO case. This represents the ugly in our legal system. Over prosecution leads to forced plea deals as defending yourself is worse than the plea.
In what can only be described as the signs of the times, 2 surviving college students were texting each other while a murderer went through their house killing 4 of their roommates. 911 anyone?
And Alex Murdaugh is headed toward a new trial. The County Clerk allegedly told jurors they didn't need to believe Alex Murdaugh and lied about a facebook post to get a pro-Alex juror kicked off the jury. The appeals court has stopped the appeal, and this matter is now before the trial court to see if these allegations are true.
Trump's civil trial will take an unusual twist next week when the prosecution calls convicted perjurer Michael Cohen to the stand. Is calling a convicted liar to the stand proof positive your case is more about political theater than law?
George Santos is indicted and under ethical inquiry. Does this mean he fits right in at Congress?
KU was punished by the NCAA this week because Adidas gave a KU player some money. How ironic is it that KU is being penalized by the NCAA for violating a rule that the Supreme Court of the United States was blatantly illegal? If you defy a blatantly illegal law, shouldn't you instead get a medal of honor?
Finally, the Supreme Court is back in session. And this first case is a doozy to understand. It involves a state (South Carolina) who redrew its Congressional district lines to move certain democratic voters out of the district. These democratic voters happen to be predominately of one minority race. Is this racial gerrymandering or partisan gerrymandering?
Didn’t check the box? Is the malpractice suit filed yet or was it a strategic move? Can you keep a straight face when stating this is not a political move against Trump? So many things to break down on the Donald Trump trial.
Keven McCarthy is ousted and Joel and Chris go head to head on their beliefs.
Trevor Bauer was suspended from MLB due to accusations of sexual assault and returned with a defamation suit. Wow, what discovery uncovered.
Is it time to abandon the presidential debates? Lincoln and Douglas are rolling in their graves after this week's circus. We are electing the leader of the free world based on who gets the best zinger during a debate. The quote of the night goes to Vivak Ramaswamy who said, "stopped talking while I'm interrupting." That's a mic drop moment.
Michigan State University fired its head football coach Mel Tucker. But the timing of the firing might have painted MSU into a legal corner that will cost it 80 million.
The Biden family is in odd spot. Hunter Biden is facing criminal gun charges because he sought a gun permit while strung up on drugs. So his legal team should be defending this charge by saying the law violates his Second Amdendment right to bear arms. But his dad has publicly supported gun restrictions. Will President Biden's fatherly duties beat out his presidential duties?
Murder is back in business. In the Dephi murder case, new allegations were made that the killings were part of a pagan cult ritual. Crime TV just couldn't be happier.
Ruby Franke got her fame on YouTube due to her unconventional parenting style. Ironically, she is now in jail facing serious charges based on that style. It is safe to say that parenting by duct tape should never be trending.
And you heard it here first - will Prime Time Deion Sanders be the next head coach for the Las Vegas Raiders?
You can buy tickets for Joel's Presumed Funny comedy special at https://improvkc.com/ShowDetails/d00611b7-c6ff-4206-986a-f12bbaa1bafb/3ef90ddd-e238-427f-bd95-e028af25d0dc/The_Presumed_Funny_Tour/Kansas_City_Improv
It what has become as part of politics and the convention strippers, impeachment is back for another season. Joel explains why impeachment works, and is here to stay. Just remember - don't sue the messenger.
The NFL floats the idea of taking over college football as a minor league system. Is this just testing the waters to see the public's reaction? Or will we soon be seeing the Alabama Cowboys v. the Ohio State Patriots?
A study is out that shows judicial sentencing is harsher on weeks following an upset loss by the local football team. No wonder incarcerations are up in Dallas. Here is a link to the study: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/app.20160390
Coach Prime Time Deion Sanders might be the best athletic participant ever. Chris makes his case, and a reluctant Joel quasi agrees. He has had an amazing career, and his coaching career has been nothing short of spectacular. Who else compares?
Smoke some turkey this weekend, because it's back to the Big 8! Nebraska v. Colorado. This game promises to be must watch TV, but it will make you miss the good old days. And yes, Joel is old.
In legal news, Alex Murdaugh's attorneys have filed a motion seeking a new trial, and their motion is very strong. Among the allegations are that the County Clerk fabricated a Facebook post to get a juror kicked off, a juror who would have voted not guilty. If you enjoyed round 1, you might get a round 2.
And finally, do you think dogs should jump up on people or things? Well believe it or not, but that exact issue is now before the United Stated Supreme Court. Yes, we now have Fido's attention.
Stop me if you've heard this before - but Trump has been indicted. Chris and Joel discuss why this poses the most danger to Trump than the previous indictments.
Michael Oher is saying the Blind Side story was false, and he was never adopted. He is suing for the economic damages he suffered from a loving family taking him in, treating him as a son, and paving the way for him to earn millions in the NFL. It also might be worth noting that Michael Oher has a new book out that needs free publicity.
And finally, the NFL is back!
In a play right out of the Democratic party playbook, Trump has been indicted again. According to Joel, this is the most laughable indictment yet as the prosecutor didn't even bring the charge everyone was looking for - inciting a riot. According to Chris, keep the indictments coming as Trump has yet to learn how to tell the truth. Sadly, both Joel and Chris agree that Trump egregiously lied to the American public about the 2020 election. Chris and Joel debate how the law should treat serial liars.
Fall is approaching, which means football is coming and conferences will be realigning. What will college football look like when the music ends?
The Hunter Biden Plea Deal was exposed when the judge asked the simple question of - what crimes does this plea deal cover? When the two sides gave opposing answers, the judge smelled a rat. Chris and Joel discuss what is up in Bidenland.
A Florida judge gets reprimanded for hugging the lawyers after a death penalty case. Do we want our judicial system run by humans ... or AI?
As if things could not get crazier, Congress held hearings on UFO and extraterrestrial life. Surprisingly, ET was not called as a witness.
Trump indicted. Again. What an interesting time we live in where the former President of the U.S. and current leader to be the next President is indicted, and the collective response is a yawn. But out of a duty of public service, Chris and Joel play lawyer and go through the indictment paragraph by paragraph to devise a winning strategy for both sides.
Kouri Richin's internet search history came to light. Chris and Joel debate whether these searches should ever be done on any computer anywhere. If you can think of a search that tops these searches, please let us know!
The allegedly conservative Supreme Court upheld the Voting Rights Act and struck down Alabama's congressional district boundary lines. To which Donald Trump responded by saying, "there's a Voting Rights Act?" Who knew?
The Supreme Court also ruled that VIP Products, a dog toy company, violated Jack Daniel's trademark rights by creating a dog toy named "Bad Spaniels." When asked to clarify its rulings, the Chief Justice said, "Meow."
The PGA and the LIV golf tours have merged, in a stunning display of hypocrisy. The PGA has been blasting the LIV tour for over 2 years, calling them thugs for taking Saudi blood money. Turns out, all money spends the same.
A lawyer used ChatGPT to write a brief and got busted. This is not high school. He didn't get busted for using ChatGPT to write the brief, he got in trouble when he essentially made "Chat" lead counsel.
It is now Supreme Court sweeps season. No one is getting voted off the Supreme Court island, though that could be fun. But this is the time where the Court grabs the public's attention by releasing all of its big decisions from the previous year. And there are some big cases yet to be decided. Affirmative action. Voting rights. Dog toys. We preview the biggest cases yet to be decided.
Bryan Kohberger was arraigned for stabbing four college kids. Every one wants to know why he did it. But at his arraignment, he just stood silent and wouldn't even plead. Kind of like my dog when I ask her if she chewed up my socks. Sometimes silence is not your golden ticket.
Lori Vallow Daybell was found guilty is near record time after her lawyers put forth no defense. I guess when you are on the record for saying your children are zombies and zombies should all die, then yea, maybe silence is your best play.
Taylor Phillips is one funny person! And that is not just my opinion. She won an Emmy for her comedy writing for the John Oliver show. Her new book "A Guide to Midwestern Conversations" is a must read. You can purchase your copy here: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/708749/a-guide-to-midwestern-conversation-by-taylor-kay-phillips/
And finally, in an epic marketing masterpiece, LeBron James said he is thinking about retirement after he laid an egg in the NBA playoffs. Now NO ONE is talking about the fact his team was swept from the playoffs. Genius. Pure genius.
A jury found Ed Sheeran did not steal Marvin Gaye's hit song "Let's Get It On" when he recorded his hit song "Thinking Out Loud." We brought on the Rock and Roll lawyer to discuss the law on ripping off someone's riff.
A college-aged student faked her own abduction to hide the fact that she dropped out of college. Kids these days ....
Finally, a person sued Celebrity Cruise line after they stored a deceased person's body in the fridge. This explains the funky taste of the potato salad.
New evidence in the Lori Vallow Daybell case now links Lori to the site where her two kids were buried on her 5th husband's property. At what point do the previous ex's say, "yea, we didn't see this coming."
Alex Murdaugh is now claiming the dog didn't do it. Previously, he said his dog tripped his housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield, causing her death. Now he is changing his story. Expert and non-experts alike are in agreement that this sudden change of story will do nothing to hurt his credibility. Apparently, when you lie about not being at the murder scene minutes before your son and wife are brutally murdered, your reputation really can't get any worse.
The Supreme Court held that a death row inmate can seek to have the DNA checked on a belt that was found near the dead body to see if it will clear his name. Three justices dissented saying, "nope, you asked for this too late, so sucks to be you." Wow, I felt bad telling people they signed up for a tennis league too late. Imagine telling someone they were too late, so now the consequence is death. Might seem a bit harsh.
Ron DeSantis takes on Disney, and I don't get it. It's ugly politics at its worst, and this is coming from a person who is a DeSantis supporter.
Trump sues Cohen. What took him so long? The year was 2018 when Trump heard his private conversation with lawyer being aired over the evening news. Five years later, Trump files suit. It must be Wacky Wednesday as the words Trump and Self-Control are now in the same headline.
Lori Vallow Daybell's murder trial continued. The prosecution spent its time showing that Lori is a religious nut who believed that her kids were zombies and thus should get an early start on their next lives. The defense continued with its strategy of saying, "yes Lori is the worst parent of all time as she didnt know where her kids were for 2 months and were later found dead on her fifth husband's property, but ... you cant prove she did the killing."
The Lori Vallow Daybell murder trial is underway. She is on trial for murdering her two kids and the former wife of her new husband. We discuss why the recent uptick in murdering children.
Alex Murdaugh has new digs in a prison that builds office furniture. Too bad inmates can't sign their names to the furniture, or this would be big business.
Finally, in our wacky case segment, Anheuser-Busch sued for false advertising after a guy drank the beer, and didn't experience the life of hot chicks clamoring over him like depicted in the commercials. Who knew?
For more details on this lawsuit, check out the opinion here: https://casetext.com/case/overton-v-anheuser-busch
For more comedic takes on the law, follow us:
Twitter:https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw
Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/comedian_of...
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/comedianoflaw
We offer comedic Continuing Legal Education courses:
https://onlinecles.com
Apple Podcasts:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/comedian-of-law/id1475370483
Listen to our podcast where we discuss legal happenings with a dose of humor:
http://podcast.comedianoflaw.com
Our Blog:
https://onlinecles.com/blog/
Trump was indicted. Immediately, there were celebrations at CNN, the Democratic Party Headquarters, and Trump Tower. Yes, all three stand to benefit greatly by this indictment. The loser here? Ron Desantis. Trump is a ratings boom for all involved. Chris and Joel unpack the legal basis for the indictment. Plus, we introduce a weekly segment on Wacky Case of the Week. In this inaugural segment, we examine a lawsuit against a dry cleaner for 65 million dollars because a pair of pants went missing.
Donald Trump is facing an imminent indictment for sloppy record keeping of business expenses. No matter the outcome, QuickBooks has to jump on this golden marketing opportunity. If Trump goes down for the manner in which his books are kept, will Al Capone give him the proverbial head nod, as in "I know what you're going through big guy."
Plus, a federal court ruled that the police are liable for property damage when they riddle your home with bullet holes trying to catch a bad guy.
Finally, Chris and Joel debate whether amateurism is a viable business model in college sports. To which the SEC teams are saying, "what's this amateurism thing you're all talking about?"
Stephen Smith was murdered in Hampton County, South Carolina in 2015. Now that Alex Murdaugh has been convicted of murdering Maggie and Paul, the Smith murder has been re-opened. Plus we cover updates to the Buffalo Wild Wings lawsuit, Flores v. NFL, Michael Irvin v. Marriott and the Supreme Court.
Sam Sheppard was convicted, both in the court of public opinion and the court of law, of murdering his wife in brutal fashion. The Supreme Court overturned the conviction due to the widespread publicity unduly prejudicing the trial. Did the same thing happen with the Netflix special and the Murdaugh murder trial? Plus, Chris and Joel lament the loss of $20,000 in student loan non-forgiveness. Finally, Joel teaches Chris to do the Rock Chalk Jayhawk chant. Go KU!
Alex Murdaugh can't join O.J. on the "let's find the real killer" tour. The jury, in just under 45 minutes of deliberating time, found him guilty of murdering his wife and son. Chris and Joel discuss how the defense proved reasonable doubt, but that didn't matter in this lowcountry area that had it's fill of the Murdaugh dynasty.
The KC Chiefs are Super Bowl Champs! Chris and Joel unpack the big game, plus give their thoughts on the true MVP. In legal news, NCAA v. Johnson was argued this week over whether student athletes are employees and should be paid overtime. Finally, a couple paid an over 4 grand for a cup of coffee. I just hope for that price, they got his name right.
The Super Bowl brings us the Kelce Bowl, the Andy Reid Bowl, and the Blowout Bowl. Joel and Chris discuss the big game and make predictions that border on future-telling. Also, the Alex Murdaugh murder trial is underway in South Carolina, putting a spotlight on whether motive is required to convict. And finally, Joel encounters the real Big Easy in New Orleans and has stories to prove it.
Alec Baldwin's murder charge: political pandering or was there actual criminal negligence? The Supreme Court takes up the issue over whether a 93 year old lady should be evicted from a $40,000 condo for not paying $15,000 in taxes. Chris and Joel point out how there are a lot of unanswered questions with this case, including where does one even find a $40,000 condo? During last week's wildcard playoff round, we saw possibly the dumbest play in the history of the NFL.
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris review the funniest moments at the Supreme Court, both past and present. They play clips of laughter and review the jokes and the cases that created the laughs.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at 36:20), Joel and Chris talk picks and review the coming games.
In today's podcast episode, Joel and Chris review the year in legal news, starting with the Southwest Airlines meltdown and what Southwest owes you for cancellations and delays. Next, they review the Monarchy's transfer of power, Brittney Griner's return, the best of the movies, and the Depp v. Heard trial. When it comes to sports, Joel and Chris review football's bowl system, Tom Brady's season, and NFL playoffs.
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris talk about the settling of the Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard case. They review other defamation cases and the outcomes. Next, they talk the Jan. 6 committee and Trump charges. This leads to a conversation around 2024 and Trump's bid for presidency.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning minute 32:55), Joel and Chris talk NFL playoffs and MVP candidates.
In today's podcast episode, Joel and Chris discuss the 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis case around free speech and discrimination and Alito's unfortunate comments. Next, they talk about Elon Musk and the Twitter files regarding suppressed information. Then, they dig into the third attempt to ban TikTok.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 34:30), Joel and Chris review the NFL and the effectiveness of systems. They debrief Tom Brady's rough year and recent crypto lawsuit against him.
In today's episode, Joel and Chris talk the latest in legal news. First, that talk about the Ticketmaster fiasco of getting Taylor Swift tickets and the potential legal fallout to break up the monopoly. Next, they review Elizabeth Holmes' sentencing. Then, they review Joel's Top 10 Wacky Cases of the last year from parodying the police to defamation lawsuits.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 37:45), Joel and Chris talk college football playoffs. They review the top 4 teams and make predictions.
In today's podcast episode, Joel and Chris review the turnout and results of the midterms. Next, they lean into the comedy of Comedian of Law and talk about when it might be time to consider a new lawyer... like when your lawyer has a tip jar on their desk or a side gig as an Uber driver. Turning back to legal news, they review some changes and challenges that may come about due to the election results. They also review the Respect for Marriage Act.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning minute 38:10), Joel and Chris review the season of the NFL so far and make predictions for games to come.
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris review the election process and the emerging lawsuits coming from this year's voting season. They talk ballot harvesting and protecting the right to vote. Next, Joel and Chris play Deal or No Deal and review some interesting court cases.
Lastly, Joel is joined by comedian and lawyer Cary Phillips. They play a clip of Cary's comedy and review the comedic processes. Joel and Cary discuss the industry of comedy, what it takes to create funny jokes, and when comedy gets "too edgy."
In Courtroom Quarterback (Beginning minute 1:25:30), Joel and Chris talk quarterbacks Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady. Then, they review NFL games and picks.
In today's episode, Joel and Chris discuss election season, affirmative action, and sports. They review the recent Supreme Court case around Harvard's and University of North Carolina's potential discriminative admissions. They debate diversity and how to define it. Next, they talk Trump's tax returns before the Supreme Court.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning minute 43:45), Joel and Chris talk recent sports news and college playoff rankings. They review conferences and TV payouts. Lastly, they review NFL picks.
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris discuss Garvey v. City of New York which deals with city workers who were fired for not being vaccinated. They discuss the inconsistencies of vaccine mandate orders and the firing of these employees. Next, they talk Lindsey Graham and his subpoena to testify about Georgia elections.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning minute 35:55), Joel and Chris talk college playoffs and NFL.
In today's podcast episode, Joel and Chris talk about the Supreme Court rejection of Trump's request for a special master in the Mar-a-lago case. They talk about humor in the courtroom and the right to engage in parody. They review recent case Novak v. City of Parma dealing with a joke at the expense of the police and the Onion's amicus brief in response to the case that skillfully mixes law and humor. They also talk Ted Cruz's campaign financing.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning minute 48:15), Joel and Chris review the latest from the NFL.
In today's podcast episode, Joel and Chris discuss a Supreme Court case about keeping pigs in cages and Tom Brady's pending divorce. First, they talk celebrities in the legal news including Alex Jones' $1 billion fine. Next, they talk about a case that the Supreme Court dismissed regarding the personhood of a fetus. Joel and Chris review SCOTUS practices, including a case about pigs and interstate commerce. They draw a parallel to what this case could mean for abortion. Then, they talk about Andy Warhol's portraits of Prince and public use rights.
In Courtroom Quarterback (minute 45:20), Joel and Chris review the latest from the NFL.
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris discuss the Oath Keepers trial surrounding the January 6 events. They define Oath Keepers and debate whether the event constitutes an insurrection. Was it an attempt to overthrow the government? Do the opening statements of the trial reflect the events of the day? Next, they talk about Dolphins Quarterback Tua Tagovailoa, his concussion, and protocol. Then, they revisit Merrill v. Milligan as the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on this case surrounding political redistricting. Lastly, Joel and Chris talk about Trump's request for Supreme Court intervention in Mar-a-Lago documents case.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning minute 54:00), they talk Aaron Judge's historic home run and the price of the ball. Then, they review their NFL game picks.
To vote for your winning NFL game picks, vote here: https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw/status/1578417913597677574?s=46&t=0W7cFfTOTAQK1zy-RoUYOA&fbclid=IwAR2V-qfLDa25MrPmKvSNS2bHsC_sdh_Sj7xWOvx902t9zKnjwJC2uWbb6Q4
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris review recent legal news including a fraud allegation facing Brett Favre. They review the stories surrounding Favre and question the journalism. Next, they preview new Supreme Court case Merrill v. Milligan that covers gerrymandering and discrimination in congressional mapping. They also review the legal case Costanza v. Seinfeld in which Michael Costanza alleges that Seinfeld based the unflattering character of George Costanza after him. In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 38:00), Joel and Chris review latest NFL games & pick their winners for the week.
Vote on your NFL game picks:
https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw/status/1575132628411359232?s=46&t=AOPZ0_p9Kg7MDh_-x7oLcg
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris review recent legal news including a fraud allegation facing Brett Favre. They review the stories surrounding Favre and question the journalism. Next, they preview new Supreme Court case Merrill v. Milligan that covers gerrymandering and discrimination in congressional mapping. They also review the legal case Costanza v. Seinfeld in which Michael Costanza alleges that Seinfeld based the unflattering character of George Costanza after him. In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 38:00), Joel and Chris review latest NFL games & pick their winners for the week.
Vote on your NFL game picks:
https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw/status/1575132628411359232?s=46&t=AOPZ0_p9Kg7MDh_-x7oLcg
In today's podcast episode, Joel and Chris dig into NetChoice v. Paxton. They talk freedom of speech and social media censorship. The question is posed whether platforms should be able to remove content and under what pretenses? Next, Joel is joined by legal analyst Dr. Tracy Pearson to break down the legal side and responsibilities of King Charles III in the shifts in the monarchy in Great Britain. In a new segment "Attorneys Gone Wild," Joel and Chris discuss the limits of candor in the courtroom after a recent outburst.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning minute 42:30), Joel and Chris review the latest in the NFL and make picks for the coming week. They end discussing baseball and the current season.
Today, Joel is joined by Scott Edwards, serial entrepreneur and comedy industry veteran. Scott gives us an inside look into the comedy industry and famous comedians like Jerry Seinfeld, Jay Leno, and Robin Williams. Scott breaks down the role of a comedian and even draws a link between the skill sets of a lawyer and a comedian. Listen as Scott shares some of his favorite comedy stories.
You can find Scott at the following:
His Website
Podcast
In today's podcast, Joel & Chris dive into religious freedom in the workplace. They review Civil Rights Act, Title VII and what "undue hardship" qualifies as. They talk the latest Supreme Court case, Groff v. DeJoy, that covers the topic by questioning whether a postal worker should be able to have Sundays off based on religion. Next, they talk about the rape victim who was ordered to pay $150,000 to family of her rapist that she killed.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 29:00), Joel and Chris break down NFL week 2. They talk about the firing of Nebraska's coach and who may replace him. Lastly, they review NFL games and make their picks for the upcoming week.
To vote along with Joel and Chris in who will win this week's NFL games, visit our social media here: https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw/status/1570114480855474176?s=46&t=7V9oF4XRV_O30x_UOTR31w&fbclid=IwAR3cEAmA2FRitsm8OFtyXekEvaEgub6FWVNlXZfmt68bi6nxAXezOO664SA
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris talk about the Nirvana lawsuit surrounding the baby depicted on the album cover. They give the latest updates on the Trump raid, discussing the merit and role of the special master to oversee the proceedings surrounding the search.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning minute 24:50), Chris and Joel talk the Britt Reid plea deal. They review the latest in the PGA versus LIV golf tour and anti-competitive behavior. They break down the new college football play-off structure and conference impact. Lastly, they talk NFL game picks.
Vote on your NFL game picks here: https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw/status/1567640952721866753?s=46&t=C1_2qcIiARxJDIKI17MUiQ&fbclid=IwAR1V-a_RwmpCFKBId4CaFAh29ah4wic-zqrDcysgzbfWE368uTnN-xHNrY4
In today's podcast, Joel interviews employment lawyer, Lauren Abrams. Lauren shares her story from rock bottom to lawyer and sharer of hope. Her podcast, 52 Weeks of Hope, emerged from conversations about purpose and meaning. She shares her learnings and wisdom on how to get through tough times. She and Joel talk about finding what it is you're supposed to do in life, including mixing legal careers with passion projects.
To learn more about Lauren, find her here:
Website
Podcast
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris debrief the week's legal news. They start by going over the latest in Trump's Mar-a-Lago search and the role of the warrant. Next, they talk about student loan forgiveness. They discuss whether the President actually holds the power to forgive these loans and whether or not it's fair. By reviewing the Heroes Act, Joel and Chris break down how Biden was able to implement the loan bailout without Congress. Next, they talk about the jury awarding money to Kobe Bryant's widow due to images shared from the tragic crash that killed Bryant and their daughter.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning minute 37:40), Joel and Chris talk sports, starting with Djokovic's absence in the U.S. Open due to being unvaccinated. Next, they talk NFL, Baker Mayfield, and quarterbacks.
In today's podcast episode, Joel and Chris review recent legal news, starting with Deshaun Watson's suspension. They dig into the FBI "raid" of Mar-A-Lago and the Trump search. Joel and Chris talk about the legal process that goes into the search and the political fallout. They debate on how documents get declassified. Next, they talk about the LIV and PGA golf tour saga. They break down monopolies and antitrust law in relation to golf competition. Then, they explore the Alex Jone's lawsuits, defamation, and his lawyers' shortcomings.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 52:00), they talk sports gambling and involving listeners in NFL season picks!
Follow along on our social media pages:
In today's episode, Joel and Chris talk all things recent sports law. First, they talk about Brittney Griner's sentence in Russia and a potential trade to bring her back to the U.S. Next, they talk about the latest in Deshaun Watson's situation, including the NFL's approach and Watson's suspension. Speaking of the NFL, they also talk about Brian Flores allegations against the Dolphins about tanking and tampering. Lastly, they talk about LIV Golf and the antitrust lawsuit against PGA.
Today, Joel is joined by Dr. Tracy Pearson who is teaming up Comedian of Law as a Legal Analyst. Dr. Tracy will periodically join Joel to debrief the latest legal happenings with her sharp analysis. In today's episode, Joel and Dr. Tracy talk about the most impactful legal cases of the past year. Dr. Tracy explains Britney Spears' conservatorship from the framework of her own experience in guardianship law. Next, they talk Depp v. Heard and the abuse that took place. They review Kennedy v. Bremerton, the power differential, and religious rights. Lastly, they talk Dobbs v. Jackson which overturned Roe v. Wade. Dr. Tracy and Joel discuss their frustrations and the extreme viewpoints that have dominated the conversation around abortion.
We are excited to have Dr. Tracy Pearson join the Comedian of Law podcast.
You can find her here:
Website
Law and Crime
Should America trade LeBron James for Brittney Griner? After the Laker's performance last year, she would definitely be an upgrade. Plus the litigants in the Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard trial all confused a 77 year old juror for a 52 year old juror. Dick Clark would be proud. Joel and Chris debate these issues, plus rag on Kevin Durant in today's episode.
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris discussing the overturning of Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson. They discuss the right to bodily autonomy and the implications of the argument for when life begins. Next, they discuss Justice Thomas' comments and original intent.
In another Supreme Court case Kennedy v. Bremerton, they discuss the decision about the praying football coach. They refer to Tim Tebow and break down the "heckler's veto."
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 40:45), Joel and Chris talk about DeShaun Watson and the NFL's inconsistent punishments. They also talk the greatest NFL coaches.
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris review the big week at the Supreme Court. Additionally, Joel interviews Danny Karon, Your Lovable Lawyer, about lawyer wellness.
First, Joel and Chris review the Second Amendment and the 6-3 ruling that protected the right to bear arms in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. Next in Carson v. Makin, the Court rules that public funding can be used at religious schools. Joel and Chris review the implications.
Next, Joel talks with Danny Karon about his legal career journey and how lawyers can be problem-solvers that genuinely serve people. Danny explains the concept of legal wellness and his mission to make justice and legal insight more accessible. He reviews how his work with Your Lovable Lawyer can educate people on both personal legal needs and some of the prominent legal issues of the last couple years like vaccine law and Depp v. Heard.
Lastly, in Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at 1:23:00), Joel and Chris talk recent sports news including Roger Goodell's recent drama with Barstool founder.
To find Danny Karon, see here:
YourLovableLawyer.com
Youtube
In today's podcast episode, Joel and Chris discuss the new PGA competitor, the LIV Golf tour. They discuss competition and capitalism amidst sports. Next, they talk about the pickleball felony in which a 71 year old man draws the lines for a pickleball court on a public sports facility and faces a felony for defacing property. Lastly, they review Supreme Court news including a Biden procedural issue case they passed on and the Chevron Deference.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 41:40), Joel and Chris talk about the NBA finals.
In today's episode, Joel and Chris review recent legal news including the attempt on Justice Kavanaugh's life. Next, they discuss Supreme Court decision in Egbert v. Boule regarding suing a federal agent. Along similar lines, they discuss the FBI's lack of action on Larry Nassar's sexual assaults despite awareness of allegations. Next, Joel and Chris talk about the lawsuit surrounding the ownership of the rights of Top Gun. They also review the legal scenario surrounding Jon Gruden, the NFL, and Roger Goodell. Lastly, they review the verdict of the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard lawsuits.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at 38:30), Joel and Chris talk NBA playoffs.
In today's episode, Joel and Chris discuss the latest from the Supreme Court. First, they start with the Supreme Court leaked opinion regarding Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson. They discuss the origin of the leak and what the potential motivation would be for leaking the opinion. Joel and Chris also discuss what this could mean about the cohesiveness and camaraderie of the Court. Next, they talk about the SCOTUS case around gun control in New York and whether the recent shooting could change the Court's decision. They talk about Carson v. Makin regarding religious rights.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 39:25), Joel and Chris talk NBA playoffs, referees, and MVPs.
Today, Joel is joined by Dr. Tracy Pearson. Dr. Pearson is a legal consultant and analyst with 2 doctorates. Joel and Dr. Pearson review the Ohio v. William Husel case which deals with whether the Ohio doctor was responsible for murdering 14 of his patients for overprescribing fentanyl. Dr. Pearson breaks down the case and the flaws that resulted in a not guilty verdict. Next, they review Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard and the fascinating scenarios surrounding it, both legal and circumstantial. Joel and Dr. Pearson also discuss gender, Title IX, and sports rights. They review the legal standards that protect against discrimination on the basis of sex and how that impacts transgender participation in sports. Lastly, Dr. Pearson shares her research on implicit bias.
You can find Dr. Tracy Pearson at the following:
Her website
Law & Crime Network
In today's podcast episode, Joel and Chris review recent legal news including the lift of the mask mandate. They discuss the legality of the mask mandate and the process in which it was struck down. They discuss "sanitation" and whether mask mandates fall under the CDC's authority as well as the procedural comment period that was skipped. Next, they review a Supreme Court case about religion in school. Lastly, Joel and Chris talk about the defamation case between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 36:00), Joel and Chris talk about Kyrie Irving and why the middle finger is (or isn't) offensive.
In today's episode, Joel and Chris review recent legal news and Joel interviews immigration lawyer Tahmina Watson. To start the episode, Joel and Chris discuss the legal issues and trial of Jesus as a nod to Good Friday. Along the lines of religion and the separation of church and state, they also talk about a Supreme Court case about a high school football coach praying during games.
Next, Joel is joined by Tahmina Watson, an immigration lawyer, author, and entrepreneur. Joel and Tahmina cover:
-
Tahmina's legal career and her journey to immigration law
-
How war impacts immigration, relative to the Russia-Ukraine crisis
-
Considerations for travel, visas, and relocation
-
The American border crisis
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 1:04:10), Joel and Chris talk Jackie Robinson and his introduction to professional baseball. They also talk about KU and Tom Brady.
You can find more from Tahmina here:
https://watsonimmigrationlaw.com/
Tahmina's Above the Law articles
In today's podcast episode, Joel interviews trademark lawyer Francesca Witzburg about her career journey, intellectual property, and how the law intersects with the world of NFTs. Before jumping into the interview, Joel and Chris review NCAA's March Madness.
Joel and Francesca discuss:
-
What it takes to be successful in law school & beyond
-
The importance of protecting your intellectual property
-
How to use NFTs for your work
-
The mutually-beneficial nature and potential of blockchain technology
Lastly, Joel and Chris wrap up the podcast with a brief Courtroom Quarterback segment about the opening day of the Royal's baseball season.
You can find more information about Francesca on her website here.
Instagram: @thetrademarkattorney @decentralawyer @lawschoolmastermind
Twitter: @theTMattorney
In today's podcast episode, Joel and Chris revisit the Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's confirmation hearings. They talk about the questions posed and Judge Jackson's answers, specifically around gender. Next, they dig into Justice Thomas and his wife's communication about the 2020 election and January 6th with White House chief of staff. They discuss impartiality and whether Thomas should've recused himself. Then, they discuss case Trevor Bauer v. Athletic Media Company. In this case, professional baseball pitcher Bauer accused of sexual assault sues for defamation. They also talk about a lawsuit against Seinfeld and lawyer fees.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning minute 41:00 ), Joel and Chris talk Bruce Arians' retirement and the NFL's overtime rules.
In today's episode, Joel and Chris discuss the March Madness that is the Senate confirmation hearings. (Don't fret, they talk NCAA March Madness too.) First, they give an update on Brittney Griner's detainment in Russia. Then, they get into the latest from the Supreme Court, including the defense of a law with questionable constitutionality. Next, they dig into the confirmation proceedings of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. They talk identity politics and the way the senators have abused the platform of these hearings. They also give a brief overview of confirmation hearings and their purpose and effectiveness (or lack thereof).
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 38:00), Joel and Chris talk basketball and March Madness. They also talk about the Kansas City Chiefs' trade of Tyreek Hill. They talk about how the recent trades will impact future play.
In today's podcast episode, Joel and Chris talk about the pros and cons of broadcasting Supreme Court proceedings. Next, they talk double jeopardy in the Jussie Smollett case as he is released from jail. They review why double jeopardy was introduced in this case to begin with and whether it has any standing. Then, Joel and Chris talk about WNBA player Brittney Griner being detained in Russia for alleged possession of a vape cartridge containing traces of cannabis. Lastly, they review the Senate's unanimous vote to make daylight saving time permanent.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 35:10), Joel and Chris talk March Madness and ESPN's coverage. They talk brackets and National Championship picks. Lastly, they talk NFL news, Tom Brady's exit from retirement, and trades.
In today's podcast, Joel and Chris are joined by Patrick Jaicomo from the Institute for Justice to discuss recent Supreme Court case in Egbert v. Boule. This case deals with the ability to sue a federal official following an instance where Boule, an inn owner, was pushed to the ground by a Border Patrol Agent, Egbert, who refused to leave the inn's grounds. They discuss the Bivens precedent and distinguish between qualifications and pathways to bring a case against a federal agent.
Next, Joel and Chris review state secrets in U.S. v. Zubaydah and the decision issued by the Supreme Court. They also discuss a procedural case surrounding abortion and Kentucky's participation in the case. Then, they discuss war crimes and the situation in Ukraine.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 56:00), Joel and Chris give updates on Deshaun Watson and his sexual assault case. Additionally, they talk Aaron Rogers and the Packers.
In today's Debriefing the Law, the Supreme Court is back from a brief break. Joel and Chris talk about the Supreme Court issues argued this week. Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco questions the ability to uphold or change rules from a prior administration. In 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, a graphic designer challenges a Colorado law about public discrimination because the designer wants the ability to post a faith-based belief on her website about not wanting to provide wedding design for same-sex couples.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 32:15), Joel and Chris discuss the U.S. women's soccer team's settlement with the U.S. Soccer Federation regarding equal pay. They also review the latest development with Brian Flores. Lastly, they review the actions of tennis player Zverez hitting his racket on the umpire's chair and where the line is for crime and athlete aggression.
In today's episode, Joel and Chris are joined by Scott Briscoe, a criminal lawyer who composes entertaining "Free Legal Tips" based on his client interactions. First, Joel and Chris review recent legal news, including Sarah Palin's lawsuit, the Remington Arms settlement in Sandy Hook lawsuit, and the Dallas Cowboys' voyeurism settlement.
Next, Joel and Chris talk with Scott Briscoe about his "Free Legal Tips." Scott shares his criminal law experiences that make for both good stories and sound legal advice.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at 47:20), Joel and Chris review the Super Bowl game, the highlights, and the MVPs.
In today's episode, Joel and Chris talk recent legal news plus preview the Super Bowl. First, they review the Sarah Palin defamation case. In this case, Palin sues The New York Times for relating Palin to the shooting of Gabby Giffords. They are looking for evidence of malice that the reporters intended to blame Palin for the tragedy. Next, they give updates in the Brian Flores case. They talk about his legal team, his future career, and the Rooney Rule.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at 39:30), Joel and Chris review their season picks and make Super Bowl predictions.
In today's Debriefing the Law, Joel and Chris talk through all the details of the Brian Flores lawsuit against the NFL. They review the claims of the lawsuit and whether there is merit. They discuss the claims about racism and intentional discrimination. Joel and Chris talk about hiring practices and review the Rooney Rule. They talk about the impact of this lawsuit and how it will play out in the court of public opinion.
They also review the new name of the Washington Football Team. Lastly, they review recent games and make picks.
In today's Debriefing the Law, Joel and Chris talk Breyer's upcoming retirement. They breakdown the make-up of the Court and the humor of Justices. Next, they discuss affirmative action and perspectives on race as it relates to the law. They also review the most recent updates in the Stormy Daniels and Michael Avenatti trial.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at 28:00), Joel and Chris talk this past weekend of football. They talk the games and important plays. After the Bills and Chiefs game, they review overtime rules. Lastly, they make predictions for the remaining games.
In today's Debriefing the Law, Joel and Chris talk the latest news regarding the Britney Spears saga. Britney's lawyer sends a cease and desist letter to her sister Jamie Lynn Spears as Jamie speaks negatively about Britney in her press tour of her new book. They also discuss Supreme Court drama with mask wearing between justices. Next, Joel explains the Establishment Clause and free speech in a forum setting in a religious case regarding flying a Christian flag. The next Supreme Court case deals with Ted Cruz and financing campaigns.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 47:30), Joel and Chris talk officiating sports games. They review referee calls and plays from recent games. Lastly, they talk picks for upcoming games.
In today’s debriefing the law, Joel joins Chris from out on the high seas. They discuss Sarah Palin’s suit against the New York Times for defamation. They discuss the qualifications for a defamation suit including malice and intention. Next, they discuss a case against Kim Kardashian and Floyd Mayweather about false claims made about cryptocurrency. They also revisit the vaccine mandates before the Supreme Court and the decisions. Another Supreme Court topic involves a person’s rights while they await trial.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 27:05), Joel and Chris talk NFL playoffs and their winning picks for the games.
In this week's de-briefing the law, Joel and Chris review the Maxwell verdict and discuss why it may be in jeopardy. In this case, one juror commits perjury and fails to disclose a part of their past that was pertinent to the case. Next, they review the Elizabeth Holmes trial and her guilty verdicts. They go over the details of her charges and her potential sentencing.
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments about the vaccination mandates in the workplace. Joel and Chris talk about the politicized nature of the COVID vaccine and what the Supreme Court will be deciding on when it comes to vaccine policy.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at 52:00), Joel and Chris talk about the football bowl season. They also go over the Antonio Brown situation from last week. Lastly, they review picks.
In today's de-briefing the law, Joel and Chris review the Ghislaine Maxwell trial verdict. She is found guilty of 5 of the 6 charges against her. They discuss the fallout and who may be next to be exposed to be involved with the Epstein/Maxwell trafficking. Next, they talk about Kimberly Potter, the police officer who mistook her gun for her taser and shot someone. Joel and Chris discuss the facts of the case and whether reasonable doubt exists. Finally, they dig into recent Supreme Court news, including the review of Donald Trump and his role in the January 6 insurrection and Biden's vaccination requirements.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 40:30), Joel and Chris talk about the SEC and recent games. They talk about John Madden and his legacy. Lastly, they make their picks for upcoming games.
In today's episode, Chris interviews Joel on his new book, UnDue Process: Exposing the Good, the Bad, and the Funny of the Law.
They give an overview of the book which uses hilarious legal commentary, a look at some wild attorney behavior, and a review of strange court cases to uncover the true role of the law with a dose of humor. They dig into some of the crazy stories in the book and share their own wacky experiences in their legal practices.
Additionally, Joel and Chris discuss overarching legal concepts like a lawyers' reputation for lying and how the "not guilty" plea perpetuates this idea. This brings conversations about the purpose of the law, the Supreme Court, and how the law fails us.
Read more about the book here. It's available for purchase on Amazon now.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 53:55), Joel and Chris give an overview of a handful of legal cases regarding sports fans suing for their money back after an event went awry. They talk playoffs and end of the season NFL games. They make their picks for upcoming games.
In today’s de-briefing of the law, Joel and Chris review the O.J. Simpson case in light of his release from parole. They discuss his case in light of his football career and the information about CTE and violent tendencies. Next, they review the Supreme Court decision for the Texas abortion law in Jackson v. Dobbs. The case dealt with procedure and how exactly the law could be challenged. Lastly, they give updates on the Elizabeth Holmes fraud trial and Ghislaine Maxwell trials.
In Courtroom Quarterback (starting at 33:00), Joel and Chris talk about Urban Meyer being fired and more coaching changes. Lastly, they make picks for upcoming games.
In today's Debriefing of the Law, Joel and Chris review the week's major legal news. First, they go over the Jussie Smollett case. They discuss his charges, hate crimes, and the role of a criminal defense attorney. They also give status updates on the Holmes and Maxwell trials.
Next, they review the Supreme Court arguments heard this week. First up is the Carson v. Mankin case which deals with religious rights and whether a state violates constitutional clauses by not allowing students to direct government student aid money to a religious school. They review the Establishment Clause and the entanglement of state and religion. Next, they review Shinn v. Ramirez. This cases deals with the death penalty and the policy around habeas relief if there were flaws within the original trial.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at 33:30), Joel and Chris review the playoff rankings. They talk about bowl games and coaches changing teams. They analyze a play in the Pittsburgh vs. Wake Forest game involving a fake slide. Lastly, they make their predictions for the upcoming games.
In this week’s De-Briefing the Law, Joel and Chris go over the major legal news stories of the week from Ghislaine Maxwell to Jussie Smollett to Dobbs v. Jackson. They review the recent trial news and evidence against Maxwell. They give an overview of Smollett’s staged crime as a publicity stunt and his charges for lying to the police. Next, they discuss Elizabeth Holmes’ fraud trial and whether her co-founder had manipulated her.
Joel and Chris review the Supreme Court case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization which deals with abortion and whether Roe v. Wade should be overturned. They go over various issues like viability, bodily autonomy, and how pro-life policy should include a more holistic approach. Additionally, this discuss the role of the Court, its power, and whether abortion would be a constitutional right.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 48:05), Joel and Chris talk college football, coaches Kelly and Riley shifting teams, and the SEC. Lastly, they make their picks for the upcoming games.
In this episode of De-Briefing the Law, Joel and Chris discuss the Ghislaine Maxwell trial and Jeffrey Epstein. The trial explores Maxwell's involvement with Epstein's sex trafficking of young girls. A poignant question in this case is whose name is written in the "black book" and who exactly is involved given that many high-profile individuals have been linked to Epstein and Maxwell. Next, they discuss the Elizabeth Holmes trial and the fraud involved with Theranos.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 32:00), Joel and Chris discuss Thanksgiving games and rivalries. Next, they talk about rankings and the College Football Playoffs. Finally, they review their predictions for the coming games.
In this week's Debriefing the Law, Joel and Chris discuss the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. They discuss the facts of the case, the media coverage, and the trial itself. They dig into surrounding circumstances around the trial with protests and whether jury intimidation exists. Next, they review the burden of proof for self-defense and provocation. They also go over the prosecutor’s mistakes and the possibility of a mistrial.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at 44:40), Joel and Chris discuss John Gruden’s lawsuit against Roger Goodell and the NFL. The lawsuit involves the Washington Football Team’s work environment and the emails involved. Lastly, they go over recent and upcoming games.
Joel and Chris debrief the Supreme Court cases in review this past week. In Ramirez v. Collier, the Court debates whether a prisoner facing capital punishment can have a spiritual adviser present during the time of execution. Part of this case deals with who exactly that advisor would be or whether that adviser could lay hands on the prisoner during the execution. Next, they dig into a case in which religious rights come up against state secrets privilege. Then, they review a legal scenario in which an IVF treatment resulted in the wrong embryos being given to the wrong women. After giving birth and caring for another couple's baby for months, the families switched babies and have sued the fertility clinic for emotional damages.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at 46:25), Joel and Chris review the NFL season at its halfway point. They discuss rankings, playoffs, and picks for upcoming games.
In today's update, Joel breaks down the major issues facing the Supreme Court this week. In Ramirez v. Collier, the Court debates whether a prisoner facing capital punishment can have a spiritual adviser present during the time of execution. In United States v. Vaello-Madero, the Court discussed Puerto Rico's ability to receive Supplemental Security Income payments. Lastly, Joel reviews the missteps in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
In today's Debriefing the Law, Joel and Chris dig into the Supreme Court cases heard this week. First, they address Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the case surrounding the Texas abortion ban. While on the surface it may seem this case is about the abortion issue, this case is actually about procedure and whether lawmakers can write out the ability for federal review. Next, they discuss a 100+ year old New York gun law and whether it violates the 2nd Amendment. These conversations bring analysis around how the Supreme Court will position itself with these cases.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 30:45), they talk about the tragedy around the Henry Ruggs III car accident. They also discuss Aaron Rodgers and his conveniently-timed Covid diagnosis for the upcoming Chiefs game. Lastly, they review and place their picks!
In today's update, Joel details how the abortion lawsuit before the Supreme Court came to be. The writing of the SB 8 abortion law that allows for private citizen enforcement works around the 11th Amendment and the 1908 Ex Parte Young case and brings to question who can challenge a law and whether there can be federal intervention here. Decision to come in the summer.
In this week's Debriefing the Law, Joel and Chris unpack recent and upcoming Supreme Court news. One of those cases is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, involving a handgun licensing law in New York. The gun law requires an applicant for a concealed carry to show “proper cause” for a license. The Court will argue whether this violates the Second Amendment. Next, Joel and Chris discuss the abortion case before the Court regarding private citizens enforcing it. They also discuss the tragedy on the movie set in which Alec Baldwin accidentally shot and killed the director of photography of movie Rust. They discuss the culpability and whether there could be criminal charges.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning 22:10), they talk the legality and practice of NFL players giving away footballs during the game. Next, they talk about player crimes of falsely claiming injuries and getting reimbursed. They also discuss Roger Goodell and the NFL investigation into the work environment and culture of the NFL and the Washington Football Team, specifically in the treatment of women. Of course, no real change or findings come out of the investigation from the non-profit that is the NFL. Lastly, they cover teams moving cities and the defrauding involved.
In this week's Debriefing the Law, Joel and Chris cover the "state secrets" in question around the Abu Zubaydah case that went before the Supreme Court this month. Zubayah was assumed to be close with Osama bin Laden and underwent torturous interrogation techniques. The Guantanamo Bay detainee has requested information about his interrogation treatment, and the Court is weighing in on whether the federal government can shield that information from him to protect privileged information. Next, they cover the topic of court packing and the politics of confirmation proceedings. Then, Joel and Chris talk about the legality of firing someone over workplace mandates for vaccinations.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 35:00), they revisit the "best coach" conversation. Then, they cover the recent and upcoming games and make their picks.
This week, Joel and Chris dig into the trials that have followed the Boston Marathon bombing as the case of the bomber has now appeared before the Supreme Court. After several appeals on the basis of press and a partial jury and unheard testimony, the High Court will now resolve it. Next, they cover Thompson v. Clark which questions whether a plaintiff has to wait for a favorable resolution of their case before they file a Section 1983 action.
In Courtroom Quarterback (minute 22:20), Joel and Chris address the emails of Jon Gruden and how they were used to push him out. Next, they talk coaches, both good and bad, and what makes a great coach. Lastly, they review their past and upcoming game picks!
In this week's De-Briefing the Law, Joel and Chris discuss the recent Urban Meyer debacle. Then, they dig into the return of the Supreme Court. They give takes on Justice Thomas' newfound chattiness, new SCOTUS cases, and controversial topics. They delve into a recent case dealing with gun laws in regard to felons and the role of the Court. Additionally, Joel and Chris review the controversial issues before the Court this session such as abortion and the 2nd Amendment. They also give an update on Britney Spears' conservatorship. Lastly in the Debriefing the Law portion, they review the legal side of the Gabby Petito death. Chris explains why it actually makes sense that the suspect's parents aren't talking.
In Courtroom Quarterback (beginning at minute 43:25), they review team rankings, upcoming games, and last week's picks. They also debrief the upcoming baseball play-offs.
This week on Courtroom Quarterback, Joel and Chris review the last week in football. They analyze Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers and their recent performances. Joel questions the future of his hometown team, the Chiefs. They discuss whether they can get back on track to make the playoffs again. Lastly, Joel and Chris review their predictions from last week and reflect on why they shouldn't gamble. Then, they place their bets for the coming games.
This week, Joel joins Chris from out on the open seas. They quickly debrief mask mandates as Joel notices mask-wearing trends in his international travels. They also revisit Texas abortion law as a new lawsuit has been filed. The lawsuit demonstrates how citizens are made to enforce the law, not the state. Joel and Chris review the last week in NFL games. They break down the role of the running back. And lastly, they predict wins in the upcoming games.
This week, Joel and Mackenzie jump back into the legal news as the Supreme Court summer break comes to an end. First, Joel and Mackenzie address the legality of vaccine mandates. They question whether a mandate at this point is an effective solution. They also review the California recall vote for Gov. Newsom. Finally, they turn the the Supreme Court cases on the docket this week. First up is a case on illegal gambling based on a law from 1798 that allows any citizen in Kentucky to bring forth a lawsuit against the gambling institutions. Next, a man hires a hitman to kill himself and the hitman failed. Is this illegal? Who's culpable? Lastly, they discuss a SWAT team stand-off that is interrupted by a naked woman in a golf cart.
In the Courtroom Quarterback segment (beginning at 43:20), Joel and Chris jump right into week one of the NFL. They review Aaron Rodgers' performance and his Green Bay contract. They also dig into rivalries and conference realignment and how that has impacted game play and the sports industry.
Comedian of Law is back after a summer break! Joel Oster and Mackenzie Smith kick off the episode with a story involving a spaghetti-covered domestic dispute. They talk about worst day in the courtroom in light of Elon Musk's lawyer vomiting in the jury box. Joel and Mackenzie talk Supreme Court, the new Texas abortion law, and what to expect moving forward. They also give an update on #FreeBritney.
This episode also features the first edition of Courtroom Quarterback, a segment in which Joel and Chris Marohn dig into all things sports and law. The segment starts at 46:30 if you want to jump right to it. Today, Joel and Chris share what they are looking forward to most this NFL season. They also review the Deshaun Watson case and how vaccination impacts player's pay.
For more comedic takes on the law, follow us:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/comedian_of...
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/comedianoflaw
We offer comedic Continuing Legal Education courses:
https://onlinecles.com
Our Blog:
https://onlinecles.com/blog/
Introducing a new segment to the Comedian of Law podcast: Courtroom Quarterback.
As a massive sports fan, Joel Oster is bringing his humorous legal takes to the sports arena. Joel is joined by fellow sports fanatic and legal professional, Christopher Marohn. Joel and Chris will review major athletics news, discuss the GOATs, and debrief where games and the law overlap.
You'll find Courtroom Quarterback featured in the latter half of the weekly podcast, starting this Friday. Enjoy this short teaser of the segment!
This week, Joel and Mackenzie Smith talk about the latest updates on Britney Spears, travel, and recent Supreme Court news. They discuss the legal definition of conservatorship and the permanent nature of the situation. Joel and Mackenzie break down the law on control over medical decisions under conservatorship and Britney's birth control. They also exchange travel horror stories. Lastly, they discuss the Supreme Court's decision to not hear a case on a florist denying a same-sex couple flowers for their wedding. They break down how the Court has dealt with this issue in the past.
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, July 2nd, 2021
In this Fourth of July edition of the Update, we dig into why the 1st Amendment makes America so great. Despite the many mistakes this country has made (most recently, freeing Bill Cosby instead of Brittney Spears), our freedoms are still worth celebrating!
Wishing you a great weekend!
In this episode, Joel is joined by Mackenzie Smith to discuss this week's legal happenings. As the public has been calling to "Free Brittney," the legal system apparently misunderstood and released Bill Cosby instead. Joel and Mackenzie dig into why this happened, the history of the case, and the procedural issues that led to his release. Next, they discuss the Supreme Court cases released this week. They talk about the major voting rights case based in Arizona in the 2020 election. The case brought up the question of whether certain voting practices were racially-motivated. Finally, Joel and Mackenzie give an additional overview of more Supreme Court issues.
Read our recent Supreme Court blogs:
Supreme Court review blog
Obamacare blog
NCAA blog
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, July 1st, 2021
In today's update, we wish the Justices a happy summer vacation as they finish up their term after today's decisions. We discuss a case on transgender rights to school restrooms that the Court declined to hear. We also talk about the voting rights case about Arizona voting practices regarding harvesting ballots and precinct voting. Lastly, we get into California's losses this Supreme Court season, including today's decision about releasing donor lists.
This past Monday, the Supreme Court issued its ruling on the NCAA and how it compensates student athletes. Joel is joined by Christopher Marohn to talk about NCAA v. Alston. After sharing their love of sports, Joel and Chris dig into the legal details of the case. The athletes claim that NCAA compensation violates anti-trust law. The NCAA hinges its argument and defense on the idea of “amateurism” and that part of the allure of college sports is that money isn’t the key motivator for players. Joel and Chris reflect on the history of pay in college sports and how that impacts this decision. They also explore the NCAA business model and how a billion dollar business can get away without paying its workforce. The Court rules 9-0 in favor of the student athletes, ruling that there cannot be restrictions on education-related compensation. Listen for a thorough exploration of sports pay and the ramifications of this case.
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, June 24th, 2021
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued 4 big decisions. In the first case, the justices side with a cheerleader who was suspended from her team for cursing outside of school. Next, the Court deals with property rights versus unions. Then, the Court rules on 4th Amendment rights when a police officer entered a man's garage after he played his music too loud and didn't pull over. Lastly, the Court dealt with separation of powers with the limitations on who could remove the director of the FHFA.
The cases discussed:
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid
Lange v. California
Collins v. Yellen
For more comedic takes on the law, follow us:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/comedian_of...
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/comedianoflaw
We offer comedic Continuing Legal Education courses:
https://onlinecles.com
Our Blog:
https://onlinecles.com/blog/
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, June 23rd, 2021
On Monday, the Supreme Court released its decision on NCAA v. Alston. The case dealt with antitrust law and whether the NCAA could neglect to pay their student athletes based on the the premise of "amateurism." In an unanimous decision, the Court upheld the lower court's opinion that barred the NCAA from restricting education-related benefits like computers, instruments, and internships.
For more comedic takes on the law, follow us:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/comedian_of...
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/comedianoflaw
We offer comedic Continuing Legal Education courses:
https://onlinecles.com
Our Blog:
https://onlinecles.com/blog/
This week, Joel is joined by Mackenzie Smith to review recent Supreme Court happenings. Will Justice Breyer retire? Are the justices making a statement about court packing with their 9-0 unanimous decisions? Joel and Mackenzie dig into these questions as well as the major cases that the Court decided this past week. First, they get into Terry v. The United States, drug sentencing and the First Step Act, and the difference between crack and powder cocaine. Next, they get into California v. Texas and the evolution of Obamacare before the Supreme Court. They discuss what the Affordable Care Act looks like with a zero penalty mandate. Finally, they debrief Fulton v. The City of Philadelphia. This case dealt with the Catholic church and whether the city could deny working with the Catholic church in the foster care system due to its religious beliefs about marriage. Listen for an analysis of recent SCOTUS news!
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, June. 18th, 2021
Yesterday was a big day on the Supreme Court. The Court released its decision on the fate of the Affordable Care Act, dismissing the challenge based on standing. This wasn't Obamacare's first time before the Court, so we review past constitutional questions and what the future of the ACA may look like. The Court also came to a 9-0 agreement in the case of Fulton v. Philadelphia. This case dealt with the Catholic church and whether the city could deny working with the Catholic church in the foster care system due to its religious beliefs about marriage.
Debriefing the Law, Daily Update | June 15th, 2021
In today's update, Joel reviews yesterday's Supreme Court decisions: Terry v. United States and Greer v. United States. In Terry v. U.S., the Court discusses a Congressional mistake on how cocaine law has been ruled on previously. Apparently, there were different sentencing for crack cocaine versus powder cocaine. In Greer v. U.S., the Court rules on the timeline a lawyer has to bring up any trial mistakes.
Stay tuned for more updates as the Supreme Court still has many major decisions coming out this month!
In today's episode, Joel and Amy discuss a lawsuit against the Queen of England for $32 trillion. Let's hope the attorney got his retainer upfront. Then, Joel explores other crazy and frivolous cases. They also go over deposition preparation and what the worst answer a client can give is. Finally, Joel and Amy dive into recent Supreme Court cases and big decisions still to come.
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, June 11th, 2021
Two Senators want to know the Supreme Court Justices' travel history, probably because they didn't want to miss bingo night at the casino. The Court decides what qualifies as a "violent felony" in the Armed Criminal Care Act. And finally, Joel gives a preview of some of the biggest Supreme Court decisions still to come.
For more comedic takes on the law, follow us:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/comedian_of_law
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/comedianoflaw
Debriefing the Law, Daily Update, June 9th, 2021
It's officially Supreme Court Sweeps Season! This means June will be full of Supreme Court decisions and updates that we are happy to report so you can stay up to date on breaking news in the legal landscape.
In today's update, we talk about SCOTUS decisions around computer abuse at work, the Court denying to weigh in on women in combat, and the future of abortion law.
Stay tuned to Comedian of Law this month as we continue to update you on major Supreme Court news!
Mackenzie Smith is back on Comedian of Law! She updates us on her run for public office as district judge. Joel tests her judicial skills on some new wacky cases such as the murder of an iguana!? Joel and Mackenzie also debrief recent Supreme Court cases. They discuss the weighty implications of the word "so," police officers taking bribes, and whether students can be disciplined for their speech and social media usage outside of school.
In this episode, Joel and Mackenzie review the following Supreme Court cases:
-
Van Buren v. United States, discussing the Computer Fraud & Abuse Act and officer bribes
-
Denver Bible Church v. Polis, discussing church Covid policy and what cases should go before the Supreme Court
-
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L, discussing the First Amendment based on a teen cheerleader's Snapchat language that led to her being cut from her team
-
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, discussing religious rights, discrimination, and foster care
Our favorite return guest, Scott Briscoe, is back with more hilarious free legal tips. Scott gives us an inside look into his legal practice in West Virginia and all of the wild stories he encounters there. He documents his cases by dishing out "Free Legal Tips" based on real interactions with his clients. In this episode, Joel and Scott discuss why it's not a good idea to flash your significant other in court, how there is a need for more sex and medical education for clients, and why offering a police officer pills isn't your best move. To avoid these legal blunders and get a good laugh, listen to Scott's sage advice in this episode!
Find Scott's Free Legal Tips here:
https://www.facebook.com/funlegaltips
This week, Joel and Amy take up a recent Supreme Court case around a cheerleader who was suspended from her team for dropping F-bombs on her Snapchat. They discuss the legal merits, 1st Amendment rights, and whether the punishment was just. Next, a women was pulled over and found out she was a wanted felon for not returning a VHS tape in the 90s. Makes us wonder how many of us are unsuspecting felons with forgotten library books and unreturned movies. Finally, Joel and Amy preview an upcoming Supreme Court case about guns in the state of New York.
This week, Joel is joined by Taly Goody. She is an attorney, firm owner, and social media mentor. Taly shares her story of opening her own law firm and transitioning from employment to business ownership. She gives sage advice on how to take the leap into doing your own thing. Taly also gives us an inside look into her social media practice and how she uses TikTok to inspire the next generation of lawyers!
Listen for Taly's great insight on legal matters, firm ownership, and using social media as a tool to engage with clients and aspiring lawyers alike.
You can find Taly here:
Website: http://goodylawgroup.com
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talygoodyesq/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talygoodyesq
In this episode, Joel interviews Bo Shuff, the executive director of DC Vote. Whether or not the District of Colombia should be a state has been a hot topic recently given the House vote over DC statehood last week. The statehood bill passed in the House and awaits Senate examination. Bo shares the history of DC and makes the case for why DC should be a state. Bo and Joel discuss the civil rights components of statehood, taxation without representation, and more on this episode!
This episode is full of interesting insight on statehood! Give it a listen!
To learn more about DC Vote and Bo Shuff, check out:
DC Vote: https://www.dcvote.org
Bo's Twitter: https://twitter.com/boshuff
This week, Joel is joined again by Amy Frances Lemanski. To kick off the episode, Joel tests Amy on her legal movie knowledge by reviewing iconic Hollywood courtroom scenes. Plus, they talk strange idioms and expletives in the courtroom. Then, Joel and Amy review the most recent updates on the Supreme Court and court packing. They give their updated takes on the Deshaun Watson case. And to close, Joel tests some stand-up comedy bits on Amy.
This episode, Joel is talking with Paul Brennan, an Australian lawyer and legal humorist.
Joel and Paul discuss life in Australia, Paul’s career, and legal humor. Paul gives us an overview of his 101 Reasons to Kill All the Lawyers, Paul’s legal blog and book that detail humorous legal scenarios and advice. Joel and Paul also discuss the difference between Australia and America, in both law and life.
Find Paul and his writing here:
Blog: https://www.101reasonstokillallthelawyers.com
Website: https://www.lawanddisorder.com.au
This episode, Joel is joined again by Amy Francis Lemanski to debrief the law this week.
It was an eventful week at the Supreme Court. Joel and Amy talk about NCAA v Alston. This case argues whether student athletes should be compensated within the NCAA. They talk about “amateurism,” the education system, and what it means to neglect to pay the players the NCAA is making millions off of. They give updates on Google v. Oracle and whether Java code can be copyright protected.
Additionally, Amy updates us on her botox experience and Joel tells about car buying adventure.
Listen to catch up on the major SCOTUS and legal news of the week!
In this episode, Joel Oster and Amy Francis Lemanski debrief the past week in the law. First, they talk about Pennsylvania prosecutor who took a side gig of being a DoorDash delivery driver. Next, they discuss Sidney Powell and the recent Dominion defamation case against her. They cover the merits of her statements (or excuses) that no "reasonable person" would believe her statements and that she was just ranting.
Additionally, Joel and Amy discuss:
-
The recent 16 allegations again Houston Texans quarterback Deshaun Watson
-
Who owns the moon
-
Supreme Court ruling on police shootings in Torres v. Madrid
-
Ford's liability in car malfunction accidents based on jurisdiction
-
When police officers can enter your house without a warrant
This week, Joel is joined by Florida lawyer Charles Vega. After a career in business, Charles began his legal journey at age 57. He tells about his experience in law school and owning his own practice. He gives sage advice on what it takes to meet your goals. He also shares inside tips on his practice within real estate law so you can avoid mishaps when buying a house.
Listen for an inspiring story and great insight from Charles.
You can find more about Charles here:
https://www.charlesvegapa.com
https://www.facebook.com/CharlesVegaAttorneyAtLaw
In this episode, Amy Francis Lemanski joins Joel to debrief this week's legal news. First, she gives us insight into her matrimonial law practice (i.e. divorce law) and some of her strangest divorce disputes. They also dive into the Twitter battle that ensued between Candace Owens and Cardi B after Fox News critiqued Cardi B's Grammy performance. The Twitter feud ended with Owens threatening to sue Cardi B for defamation. Joel and Amy discuss if there's merit and the purpose of all the spectacle. Next, they discuss the political makeup of the Supreme Court and whether Justice Breyer should retire to make room for another Democrat justice under the Biden administration. Finally, they talk courtroom Zoom mishaps.
In this episode, Joel talks with Michael Thompson about legal conspiracy theories. They discuss the missing 13th Amendment— no, not the one that ended slavery— the almost-ratified one that stated titles of nobility would revoke American citizenship. As legal conspiracy theorists might suggest, perhaps this is a ploy to rid lawyers of their citizenship for their use of the nobility title “esquire.”
Find Michael and Commonplace Fun Facts here:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/commonplacefact
Web: https://commonplacefacts.wordpress.com
This week, Joel is joined by Chris Marohn to debrief recent legal cases. They talk voting rights, including ballot harvesting and how voting laws interact with political parties. They discuss the census, districts, and election fraud. Next, they go over Tiger Woods' recent accident and the investigation into his car's "black box." They discuss whether or not there was probable cause or evidence of impairment that justifies a warrant. Finally, they talk cancel culture and the discontinuation of certain Dr. Seuss publications.
In this episode, Joel interviews Kyona McGhee, a trademark lawyer from Detroit. Joel and Kyona talk Jesus Christ’s opinions of lawyers. Kyona shares her legal journey from having her mom arrested during her childhood to graduating valedictorian of her law school and following the demand for trademark law. Kyona gives her expertise on different trademark cases and scenarios from trademarking your own name, the word “the,” and profanity. Listen for excellent trademarking advice and entertaining stories from Joel and Kyona.
Find Kyona here:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kyonathelawyer/
Website: https://www.trademarkmystuff.com
This week, Joel interviews Joe Patrice, senior editor at Above the Law— a legal news site with irreverent commentary on current events and the legal profession. Joe shares his takes on living in New York City and his legal career path. Joel also quizzes Joe on his movie knowledge, wacky cases, and the validity of the bar exam. They debrief the Dominion lawsuit against the My Pillow CEO, Mike Lindell. Finally, they theorize on Trump’s tax records and what they’ll reveal after the Supreme Court denied Trump’s efforts to conceal the documents.
Find Joe here:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/JosephPatrice
Above the Law: https://abovethelaw.com/author/joe-patrice/
This week, Joel interviews Brittany Alexander, an insurance lawyer from Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. In this episode, Joel and Brittany discuss all things property insurance law. They talk Brittany’s legal career, LSAT tips, and how someone gets into insurance law. They review the impact of Covid policies on business closures. They talk about how to know if you have found good homeowner’s insurance or if you’re getting scammed.
Listen for tips and tricks on navigating homeowner’s insurance.
You can find Brittany here:
Website: https://premierpropertylaw.com
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawyer.britt/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawyer.britt
In this week's Debriefing of the Law, Joel and Mackenzie review the impeachment proceedings for Trump that occurred last week. They talk merits, the politics, and bias in the proceedings. They cover how the last week is not representative of a true legal "trial" but rather a political process. Finally, they discuss the role and protection of the First Amendment in this case.
Also in this episode, they discuss the conservatorship of Britney Spears. They go over the types of conservators that exist, the circumstances around Britney's conservatorship, and what it all means.
With the Super Bowl just days away, Joel and Mackenzie talk all things game day from Tom Brady, winning predictions, and the national anthem. They also dive into Trump's pending impeachment and what a post-presidential impeachment could mean. They cover the legal and political fallout of impeachment and predict the likelihood of his conviction. Finally, Joel and Mackenzie give their takes on recent legal news, such as a $250 million art lawsuit against Germany, a lawyer making jail porn, and "free divorce" ads.
This week, Joel and Mackenzie debrief the upcoming Super Bowl, GameStop, and the filibuster.
In this episode, they predict Super Bowl winners and review their playoff predictions. Joel and Mackenzie cover the GameStop stock frenzy from shorting to Reddit and the legal and market implications of what's happening. They also discuss the history and role of the filibuster. And finally, they talk about Supreme Court reform and other changes that could occur under the Biden administration.
This week, Joel interviews Molly Parmer. Molly owns a law firm in Atlanta that handles high-stakes criminal cases, predominately in federal court, with a focus on sex crimes, violent crimes, drug crimes, and weapons violations. Known for her tenacity, Molly fights for the accused and their rights to an excellent defense. Listen for insight into the justice system from an expereinced criminal defense attorney.
In this episode, Joel and Molly talk about Molly’s untraditional upbringing and what led to her career in law. She gives an inside look at being a criminal lawyer and what it takes to defend high-stakes cases, including sharing her wildest case that took her to Bosnia. Joel and Molly talk about why everyone deserves defense— no matter what they are accused of. They also give their legal takes on recent stories like the Capitol attack and Aunt Becky’s college admission scandal.
Find Molly Parmer here:
Website: https://parmer.law
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ParmerCriminalDefense
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mollyparmer/
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/molly-hiland-parmer-aa411618/
This week, Joel and Mackenzie cover the NFL playoffs, the Biden Inauguration, and free speech.
In this episode, Joel and Mackenzie discuss how law overlaps with football and other various NFL tactics and stories. They debrief the inauguration, the fallout, and a Biden administration. Additionally, they talk about free speech and what that looks like today from the lens of the law and 1st Amendment. They discuss the role of big tech as "public actors" when it comes to regulating the content of their platforms.
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Jan. 20th, 2021
Inauguration Day in America is a time when we all come together, as a unified country to welcome a new president. While we often don’t agree, we’ve come up with some policy items that President Biden can add to his docket that are sure to bring us all together.
A lot has gone down since Joel and Mackenzie last debriefed the law. In this episode, they will cover the Capitol attacks, President Trump's second impeachment, and lawsuits from $1 to $1.3 billion.
Joel and Mackenzie discuss the differences between the riot at the Capitol and the riots that occurred last summer. They go over Trump's controversial statements and whether they are protected under the constitution. Therefore, they discuss the merits and circumstances around Trump's impeachment. Finally, they review the arguments that came before the Supreme Court this week about whether cases can be brought forth for just $1.
For more comedic takes on the law, follow us:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/comedian_of...
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/comedianoflaw
We offer comedic Continuing Legal Education courses:
https://onlinecles.com
Our Blog:
https://onlinecles.com/blog/
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Jan. 14th, 2021
This week, the Supreme Court heard arguments about whether cases can be brought before the court for one dollar. $1 can’t even get you much at the Dollar General anymore, but can it get you justice in court? Also, we review the comments from lawyer Dan Eckhart on defending Adam Johnson, the man smiling with Speaker Pelosi’s lectern in the Capitol attacks.
We took a break from our Daily Updates over the holidays, but now we are back!
Jan. 11th, 2021
After last week’s attack on the Capitol, impeachment talk has been prevalent. However, the logistics and legality of impeaching Trump are questionable. With a Biden presidency less than two weeks away, it seems unlikely that the impeachment proceedings will move through the House and the Senate in time. Especially since the next day that Senate meets is on Jan. 20th— the day of Biden’s inauguration. Given that impeachment is intended to remove someone from office, it seems unlikely that Biden will want to start off his presidency by impeaching someone no longer holding office. We will see how it all plays out.
Joel and Mackenzie review the wild year that was 2020. From their personal New Year's resolutions to Covid to the election, they debrief it all. Joel and Mackenzie discuss the merit or lack thereof of the many election lawsuits. They cover the recent phone call between Trump and the Georgia Secretary of State, news headlines, impeachment, social media in politics, and so much more. 2020 had a lot in store for all of us, and the legal world was no exception. Listen for some reflection on the many legal happenings of 2020.
This week, Comedian of Law interviews Alexandra Sabalier. Alexandra was born and raised in Puerto Rico, is as an attorney at law in the Washington D.C. Bar, and is currently a resident of Berlin, Germany. As a travel-lover and expat herself, Alexandra has learned the ins and outs of tax and immigration and offers her legal expertise to world travelers on these topics.
In this episode, Joel and Alexandra discuss Alexandra's career as an international tax and U.S. immigration lawyer. She also gives us an inside look at what it's like to live in Berlin— from the German opinion of America to their approach to Covid and the holidays. Alexandra is a wealth of information on the legal side of international living. Listen to learn more about international tax law, Alexandra's career journey, and living abroad.
You can find more from Alexandra here:
Website: https://www.sabalierlaw.com
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sabalierlaw/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sabalierlaw
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sabalierlaw/
Comedian of Law is all about finding the intersection between humor and the law, which is why we were thrilled to interview Negin Yazdani. Negin is an in-house lawyer in the video game industry and stand-up comedian on the side.
In this episode, Joel and Negin discuss Negin's career path, what it means to negotiate, and the day-to-day of an in-house lawyer. With her experience in comedy, Negin has learned how to find the funny in life, even in the more unpleasant things. Listen as she and Joel discuss how to find humor when it seems elusive, how personal experiences make for good jokes, and how spaces like law and business can benefit from comedy.
Follow Negin here:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/negsi/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/NeginNina
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Dec. 15th, 2020
Yesterday, Attorney General Bill Barr turned in his resignation. He couldn’t stick it out one month longer. Not sure we blame him. Also, yesterday, the Electoral College casted their votes for our president and Joe Biden won. Again. Will this be the end of election lawsuits? It’s too soon to tell. However, it isn’t too soon to call Jill Biden by her deserved title of Dr. Biden. Though, I can’t help but wonder if lawyers feel a bit slighted by not getting to go by doctor even with their juris-doctor degree. Oh well.
What a week to debrief! Don’t mess with Texas, or they’ll sue in you in the Supreme Court. Texas files a lawsuit against 4 states at the US Supreme Court. Talk about your last minute Hail Mary pass. Plus, Facebook is apparently a big company. The FTC and several states have sued Facebook for anti-trust violations.
In this episode, Joel and Mackenzie dive into the standing and merits of the Texas lawsuit, original jurisdiction, and the implications if the Court takes up this case. Mackenzie is on fire this episode with her hot takes. So much so, her fire alarm goes off, forcing her building to evacuate mid-recording. Don't miss this fiery episode as Joel and Mackenzie unpack all of the major issues of the law this week.
Darren Heitner is a sports and contract lawyer, contributor to Above the Law, creator of Sports Agent Blog, and adjunct professor. Darren has worked with a multitude of professional athletes and with his motto of "Just Do Something," he has amassed an impressive career portfolio within the sports law world.
In this episode, Joel taps into Darren's wealth of knowledge about sports and the law. They discuss Darren's alma mater University of Florida's sports legacy, how one ends up in sports law, and the impact of Covid in professional sports. Additionally, Joel and Darren give their takes on popular sports law cases.
This episode is for all you sports fans out there.
You can find Darren at the following:
Website: https://darrenheitner.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DarrenHeitner
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sportsagent/
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Dec. 8th, 2020
We all know the Hail Mary is a desperate play in football when the quarterback throws the ball high into the endzone and just hopes for the best. Well, it seems as though the Trump team is playing their Hail Mary with the attempt to halt the vote certification process of the election results in Pennsylvania. Time is running out on these election lawsuits with the electoral college meeting on December 14th. Also, a woman gave birth while taking the bar exam! Listen to the Update for the details.
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued Covid restrictions that appeared before the Supreme Court in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo. This case dealt with attendance restrictions for churches compared to the restrictions imposed on other businesses in relation to the Coronavirus pandemic. Joel Oster and Mackenzie Smith discuss the grounds of the restrictions, where Cuomo went wrong, and Covid fatigue.
This episode gives an overview of recent Supreme Court rulings, election lawsuits, and debriefs a federal lawsuit against "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" star Erika Jayne's husband.
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Dec. 3rd, 2020
Yesterday, Trump addressed the nation from the White House. He made comments that if he was right about the election fraud, Biden couldn’t be president. Our concern is his use of “if I’m right.” You are supposed to file a lawsuit because you have facts, not because you have hope. Allegedly, Trump is using all of this as steam for a 2024 campaign. Additionally, the Supreme Court heard arguments of Ramos v. Louisiana last week. The court ruled that there is a right to an unanimous jury. Now the question is whether that will apply retroactively to cases in which the jury was not unanimous.
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Dec. 2nd, 2020
Yesterday, U.S. Attorney General William Barr issued a statement that there is no substantial voter fraud that could change the election results. Meanwhile, Trump and his legal team are still pressing forward on their allegations, claiming the DOJ hasn’t investigated at all. Also, anyone else notice the resemblance between Giuliani and Grandpa Munster?
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Dec, 1st, 2020
With the FCC chairman, Ajit Pai, stepping down, the conversation about net neutrality has sparked again. Apparently net neutrality has nothing to do with tennis which is a disappointment. However, net neutrality does make it possible for equal treatment from internet service providers. On a related note, we have also seen Big Tech step into a role that is not as neutral as it is supposed to be.
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Nov 30th, 2020
Last week, the Supreme Court ruled on whether Cuomo was allowed to prohibit church gatherings to 10 people or less. Considering that liquor stores where allowed to be open at capacity but churches that could seat 1,000 couldn’t even gather with 11, the Court found this mandate unconstitutional. Had the court ruled otherwise, we may have seen some churches start to turn water into wine in order to bring in some sales and their congregation. Also, Trump is at it again, asking Georgia Gov. Kemp to use his emergency powers to interfere with the state’s recount. However, Kemp reminded the President that his ask was illegal…
Election lawsuits are losing steam, Obamacare appeared before the Supreme Court, and Thanksgiving prep is well underway. Joel and Mackenzie discuss how the election lawsuits are playing out, the press conferences that have surrounded them, and the timeline going forward. Both agree that the courts will not be changing much about this election and that if major fraud existed, we would've found it by now. Additionally, this episode overs the Affordable Care Act, whether there is standing, severability, and much more! Listen for takes on the future of the election and Obamacare.
Comedian of Law wishes you a happy & delicious Thanksgiving! If you're traveling, stay safe and healthy!
For more comedic takes on the law, follow us:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/comedian_of...
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/comedianoflaw
We offer comedic Continuing Legal Education courses:
https://onlinecles.com
Our Blog:
https://onlinecles.com/blog/
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Nov 25th, 2020
With Thanksgiving just a day away, we’ve had the official Turkey Pardon from Trump in the rose garden yesterday. But Corn the turkey isn’t the only one to be receiving a pardon. Thanks to Article II, we know the president has the power to pardon those who have been convicted of a crime. Rumor has it that National Security Advisor Michael Flynn will soon be receiving said pardon from President Trump.
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Nov 24th, 2020
Trump is finally conceding and allowing the GSA to proceed with the transfer of power. We are all a little surprised to see cooperation from him. Additionally, a wedding in New York incurs a $15,000 fine due to violating Covid mandates. Seems a bit harsh when you consider CA Gov. Newson’s recent maskless actions or Pelosi’s hair appointments, but we all know NYC is an expensive place.
This week's guest is Dina Cataldo. Dina is a criminal prosecutor and lawyer coach. She helps lawyers master time management so they can build their legal practices without stress and overwhelm.
Joel and Dina talk about how to get 5 hours back during your week, brain wiring, and how to structure your week for productivity. Dina covers everything from your subconscious to calendaring to multitasking.
Listen for some practical tips on how to make the most of your time and enjoy your life.
Follow Dina here:
Dina's Website: https://www.dinacataldo.com The Busy Lawyer's Quick Start Guide: https://www.dinacataldo.com/busylawyer Be a Better Lawyer Podcast: https://www.dinacataldo.com/podcast/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dina.cataldo/
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Nov 23rd, 2020
Last week, Rudy Giuliani gave a press conference to remember. Even better than the one at Four Seasons Total Landscaping. Between the hair dye running down his face and his impersonations of My Cousin Vinny, you almost didn’t notice the completely baseless voter fraud claims. However, Tucker Carlson attempted to give Trump Lawyer, Sidney Powell, a chance to follow up on her strong, democracy-threatening claims, but she refuses to present any proof. In fact, she got angry and asked to not be contacted anymore. As if denying to prove a massive threat to the democracy was as trivial as blocking your weird Uncle Doug’s creepy messages on Facebook.
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Nov 19th, 2020
Covid lockdown controversy comes before the Supreme Court again. This time, the case deals with who is exempt from Covid restrictions, brought on by a Roman Catholic Diocese and Orthodox synagogues in Brooklyn. These religious organizations are challenging Cuomo’s order to limit gatherings to 10-25 people. Previously SCOTUS has thrown out such cases because the justices did not feel they were qualified to make this call. This time around, with a new justice and further into the Pandemic, things may be different.
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Nov 18th, 2020
After Giuliani’s guest appearance in the Borat sequel, we know he has impeccable judgment. This continues to be evident as he has taken the lead on Trump’s legal actions in PA. I mean, $20,000 a day?! For that stellar judgement?! Worth it. Additionally, Joel reviews what happened with the confidential documents of the grand jury proceedings post Mueller Report that the Judiciary Committee requested pre-Biden win. Apparently no one wants to see them anymore. Must’ve been more political than they led on.
De-Briefing the Law, Daily Update, Nov 17th, 2020
People are thinking about moving to Georgia to help out with the Senate, thanks to Andrew Yang. Not sure that’s a foolproof strategy, but we’ll see. Additionally, we’ve seen another college admissions scandal join the ranks with Aunt Becky, this time by Tech CEO Jack Zhao. And finally, Taylor Swift finds a loophole to counter the people that won’t sell her the rights to her own music.
In our new series, Debriefing the Law: Daily Updates, Joel Oster discusses legal happenings with our Comedian of Law twist. These 2-3 minute segments will serve to give you your daily dose of news and humor.
Trump is still claiming voter fraud and going forward with his lawsuits despite the many experts that say it will lead to nowhere. Also, 2 viable Covid vaccines are in the works. We think this is a great marketing opportunity for Corona Beer to sponser the vaccines. Corona: Get a shot and take a shot.
Introducing our newest series: Debriefing the Law, Daily Updates
We know that sometimes the news is best consumed in smaller, more manageable segments. That's why we created Daily Updates. This series will serve to give you your daily dose of news and laughter at the same time. We will cover highlights of the day's happenings with our Comedian of Law twist.
This podcast episode compiles this past week's updates. Listen for an overview of election fallout, voter fraud in court, and the Affordable Care Act in the Supreme Court.
You can find each day's update across all of our social channels, linked below.
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/comedianoflaw
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVzANPewQJ4&list=PLeEDtpbVWNI2QCdxvG3WvF4UeHFLTK6e7
Twitter: https://twitter.com/comedianoflaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/comedian_of_law/
As the election drags on, Mackenzie Smith and Joel Oster unpack all things legal when it comes to election fiascoes. Mackenzie gives the inside scoop on the state of the election in Pennsylvania as a Philadelphia local. They weigh the likelihood of voter fraud and how it would hold up in court. Spoiler alert – don’t count on the courts to change any votes. Not gonna happen. This episode will cover the lawsuits surrounding the election, the future of pollsters, and why this election has been so close with the shy Trump vote.
With the election just days away, it seems appropriate to reflect on some of the strategies that have been used in campaigning for president. From blunders to success stories, this episode covers what has and hasn't worked in the making of a presidential candidate.
Joel Oster and Mackenzie Smith give their best tips for aspiring candidates based on mistakes that have been made in this election cycle and many before that. Joel gives his hot takes on his Covid experience and calls into question President Trump's Covid comments and test results. And Mackenzie highlights that sound advice for elections seem to apply to everyone but our 45th POTUS.
For more tips, read our blog here.
References:
Elaine Benes Dancing
DNC Macarena
In this episode, Joel talks to Scott Briscoe, a criminal lawyer with years of experience and outrageous stories. He has been dishing out free legal advice online for quite some time. However, these aren’t your run-of-the-mill legal tips. These are oddly specific pieces of advice on practices to avoid if you don’t want to serve time, based on his own 23 years in criminal law.
For example, “hold off on wearing your ‘Out on Bail’ shirt the day you commit a crime, unless you prefer a little irony in your mug shot.”
We hope you never need these pieces of advice, but Scott is here with top-notch guidance to help you dodge the mistakes others have made.
We interviewed him to get some of his best “legal tips” along with the crazy background stories that go with them!
Read our blog where we feature some of our favorite tips, not discussed in this episode, here.
See Scott's page where he posts his tips here.
This week, Amy Coney Barrett has been in the spotlight as she undergoes her confirmation hearings for possible appointment to the Supreme Court. With the presidential election less than 3 weeks away, there has been a lot of controversy surrounding the timing of ACB's nomination. In the hearings this week, there have been long speeches made by senators, many questions asked about Roe and the ACA, and a refreshing lack of drama like what surrounded the 2018 Kavanaugh hearings.
In this episode, Joel and Mackenzie discuss confirmation hearing highlights, Joel's tweets, and judicial philosophy.
For more information on the topic, check out Comedian of Law's blog "Filling the Seat: How ACB's Confirmation Stacks Up with History."
After recent debates, we can't deny that fighting is highly prevalent in our elections. Presidential candidates have been known for hurling insults and creating fear by inciting thoughts of the worst case scenario. But, this isn't new. That has been going on since America's first election.
Take these 1800's presidential candidates' insults for example:
“If you elect the other guy, we would see our wives and daughters the victims of legal prostitution.” Or “My opponent would create a nation where ‘murder, robbery, rape, adultery and incest will openly be taught and practiced.’” Or "hideous hermaphroditical character, which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman.”
When it comes to fear mongering and hermaphrodite attacks, there is nothing new under the sun.
In this episode, Joel Oster and Mackenzie Smith will unpack the history of ugly political insults, contested elections, as well as go over the VP debate and the Supreme Court, all in this week’s Debriefing of the Law.
Podcast references:
Daisy Commercial
Cider & the Election Image
To read more about the history of American Politics, check out our most recent blog: "American Deja Vu: 2020 isn't as "unprecedented" as We Think.
Amy Coney Barrett, aka Newbie ACB, has been nominated to replace the Notorious RBG on the Supreme Court. Which means ... hold on to your seats. We are about to witness a confirmation proceeding that will make the Tyson/Holyfield fight seem like a petty sibling rivalry. In today's podcast, Mackenzie Smith and Joel Oster remember the Notorious RBG and her stellar legal career. From graduating top of her class at Columbia to staring in three major movies, including a legos movie, she has seen it all.
In addition, we will look to her possible replacement. Will the Newbie ACB replace the Notorious one?
For more information, check out this blog on RBG paving the way for ACB.
Shannon Bahrke talks about how she trained to become a world champion and Olympic medalist and how those training habits can be incorporated into your daily routine.
The Big 10 reminds me of Biff from Back to the Future: A big bully and an idiot. What is the Big 10 doing? Trying to tell every recruit "yes football is a violent sport. But have you seen the briefcase of that attorney? We're scared!" If you are of the mind that the Big 10 rooted its decision in the findings of the medical and scientific communities, let me remind you - they cancelled football ... and track. Seriously Big 10, you can figure out how to gas your car safely but you can't figure out how to sanitize a shot-put?
But it's not enough that the Big 10 is scared of lawyers, the Big 10 is also the neighborhood bully. I might be able to excuse their decision as being protective of their NY (Rutgers) and Chicago (Northwestern) area universities. But the Big 10 also is comprised of rural areas such as Nebraska and Iowa. Why should the Big 10 cripple the economies of places like Lincoln and Iowa City because of the impact of the virus on huge metro areas? But, like Biff, the Big 10 bullied Nebraska and said if we cant play football as a conference, then you can't play either. Thanks Biff!
So what did the Big 10's "I'm afraid of lawyers so let's just cancel all sports" and their "If we can't play no one can play" get them? A lawsuit. Somewhere, Alanis Morissette is smiling.
Robert Kraft’s solicitation charges are in doubt after the court throws out the videos. No word if Hoody has had them deleted yet. Trump’s personal twitter account is now before the US Supreme Court. Finally, we can get to the bottom of this Kafafee. I hope I am using that made-up word correctly. And Steve Bannon is charged with fraud over the Go Fund the Wall account. Which does beg the question – who donated to that cause? Isn't that like, “Hey, I don’t pay enough in taxes. Why not pay more?” Really folks, If you care that little about your money, send it to me. I’m building a wall around my landscaping. All of this, plus I interview Steven Iwersen about his book Porcupine Principles, in this week's De-Briefing of the Law.
The Big 10’s lawyers bully the University of Nebraska’s football team into submission, I am guessing this battle didn’t occur physically on the football field, Kamala Harris is apparently already on the clock now trying to vet her possible VP candidates, yea, watch your back Biden, and the DOJ sends a letter to Yale saying they are discriminating against Asian Americans in their admission process. All in this week’s debriefing of the law.
President Trump forgets he has a legal team before tweeting he wants to move the election, Johnny Dep admits to being an habitual drug user and all-around bad guy in his defamation trial, and Bar Examiners have given up and resorted to handing out participation trophies, all in this week’s debriefing of the law.
Constanza sued Seinfeld in a case the court said “is about nothing,” a man in Ohio asks a court to undue his own death certificate, and A dad sues his wife after she gives birth to an ugly child, all in this week’s debriefing of the law.
The Supreme Court’s 2019-2020 season is now over. It is time to go back to binge watching Stranger Things, Dr. Who, and re-runs of the Superbowl. It might be the last sporting event of our lifetime. But now the Supreme Court justices are taking off their work robes and putting on their leisure robes. Heck, who am I kidding? They have been working from home this entire time. I really doubt the Notorious RBG was putting on her doily every day while officing from home. But I am going to assume she did better than me, as usually I have to ask myself before I go to bed at night – did I even shower today? Have I contributed to the laundry basket at all this week?
But now that the Nine are off binge-watching Better Call Saul, Billions and Goliath, it’s time to unpack their recent flurry of decisions. Trump’s tax records, abortion, what bathroom can I use at work? All matters of national importance, and all matters that the Supreme Court decided this past term. So without further rambling, let’s review the biggest cases and more in this week's De-Briefing of the Law.
To learn more about about Mackenzie Smith, The Aviator Attorney, click here.
If you are an attorney or in the legal profession and need to complete your annual CLE requirements, visit our site Comedian of Law.
Today's episode is sponsored by Digital Directory Management. Be sure to grab your business' complimentary baseline report to see how you are showing up online. Visit http://www.digitaldirectory.management/ today!
Today, I have a special Guest as Dr. Jim Garlow joins me to talk about the benefits of humor. I think it is safe to say that currently, stress abounds. Can I light off fireworks without offending someone? If I go out and buy groceries without a mask, will I be killing more people than Hannibal Lecter? And most importantly, when will football be back on?! Oh yea, The Chiefs finally get a franchise Super Bowl winning quarterback, and then football ends.
So with all of this stress, we need to pause to enjoy life. So in this episode, best selling author and confidante to kings, queens, and sometimes his grandkids, will join us today to unpack the benefits of humor in this weeks, debriefing of the law.
For more about Dr. Jim Garlow and his books, click here.
If you are an attorney or in the legal profession and need to complete your annual CLE requirements, visit our site Comedian of Law.
Today's episode is sponsored by Digital Directory Management. Be sure to grab your business' complimentary baseline report to see how you are showing up online. Visit http://www.digitaldirectory.management/ today!
As always, if you enjoy our Podcast, please subscribe, leave a rating or review on your favorite streaming service and follow us on social media to help others find the show.
Mackenzie Smith and I are reviewing last week's rulings on Bostock and DACA in this week's De-Briefing the Law.
To learn more about about Mackenzie Smith, The Aviator Attorney, click here.
If you are an attorney or in the legal profession and need to complete your annual CLE requirements, visit our site Comedian of Law.
Today's episode is sponsored by Digital Directory Management. Be sure to grab your business' complimentary baseline report to see how you are showing up online. Visit http://www.digitaldirectory.management/ today!
This week, we unpack the craziest cases in law. Michael Constanza sued Jerry Seinfeld claiming that the Character George Constanza was based on him. Yea, don’t put that on your Match.com profile. Michael Cohen pleads guilty to something that isn’t even a crime. And Pornhub is sued by a deaf man because under the Americans with Disabilities Act. These cases, plus Mackenzie Smith and I unpack the timeless classic – Legally Blonde, in this week’s Debriefing of The Law.
Top 10 Wacky Cases is one of the continuing legal education courses we offer to lawyers, where I unpack the top ten craziest cases in law. If you are a lawyer and in need of CLE’s please check out this class.
It is available on our website and is offered in on-demand and webinar formats. In this course, we unpack the actual law behind the craze headline cases. Because who knows, maybe one day a person will come to your office who just spilled hot chocolate in his tender areas, and if you took my class, you would know the relevant precedent. Recently, Mackenzie Smith and I talked about our favorite 2-3 craziest cases.
To learn more about about Mackenzie Smith, The Aviator Attorney, click here.
If you are an attorney or in the legal profession and need to complete your annual CLE requirements, visit our siteComedian of Law.
Today's episode is sponsored by Digital Directory Management. Be sure to grab your business' complimentary baseline report to see how you are showing up online. Visit http://www.digitaldirectory.management/ today!
As always, if you enjoy our Podcast, please subscribe, leave a rating or review on your favorite streaming service and follow us on social media to help others find the show.
I am excited about this episode as I was able to interview a real comedian. Felipe Torres Medina is a comedy writer for Stephen Colbert on The Late Show. And I was able to talk to him about how to make something funny. Whether you are a professional comedian and looking to get to the next level, or you are an amateur and just trying to give your significant other new material to listen to after 20 years of listening to the same joke, Felipe will give you tips on how to write something funny. Trust me, I took notes.
One of the classes I teach is Comedy in the Court: Using Humor to Persuade. Humor can break down barriers, make you think. If used effectively, humor makes you more persuasive. I recently read about the great Chief Justice John Marshall of the US Supreme Court using humor to get the other justices to side with him on big cases.
Abe Lincoln. Clarence Darrow. Williams Jennings Bryan. All knew how to use humor to persuade. But more importantly, its just fun. We like to laugh, and we like to make others laugh. So if you want to learn more about using humor to make you more persuasive, check out our online classes at www.comedianoflaw.com.
Today, we are going to get a glimpse on how to make something funny. We are going to get inside the mind of a funny man at the top of the comedic ladder, Felipe Torres Medina.
Felipe Torres Medina is a satirist from a country you misspell. He is a writer for The Late Show with Stephen Colbert and his humor writing has been featured in The New Yorker, McSweeney’s, Points In Case, Bustle, BuzzFeed, CollegeHumor, and more.
As always, if you enjoy our Podcast, please subscribe, leave a rating or review on your favorite streaming service and follow us on social media to help others find the show.
Flushgate comes to the Supreme Court, Chatty Clarence Thomas can’t be shut-up, and the Supreme Court finally deals with an issue near and dear to everyone’s hearts – nuisance robocalls. Yes, let’s put the coronavirus to the side for a bit. Let’s tackle another national menace. Plus Mackenzie Smith and I unpack the Movie Just Mercy in this week's De-Briefing of the Law.
To learn more about about Mackenzie Smith, The Aviator Attorney, click here.
We've transformed all of our continuing legal education courses so they are now available in both webinar and online formats. While we look forward to live events again in the future, we want to provide solutions for the current work environment. If you are an attorney or in the legal profession and need to complete your annual CLE requirements, visit our site Comedian of Law.
Today's episode is sponsored by Digital Directory Management. Be sure to grab your business' complimentary baseline report to see how you are showing up online. Visit http://www.digitaldirectory.management/ today!
As always, if you enjoy our Podcast, please subscribe, leave a rating or review on your favorite streaming service and follow us on social media to help others find the show.
Aunt Becky, aka Lori Laughlin, and her husband whoever, pled guilty in the college admissions scandal. Under terms of the agreement, Lori will spend 2 months in jail, pay a 150,000 fine, and agree that all future bribes to colleges will be done the normal way – paying the university directly to put their name on the side of a building.What? Do you really think George W. Bush got into Yale because of his SATs?
Also, Michael Cohen has been released from prison and is allowed to spend the duration of his prison term in his NY apartment. No word yet if this should be viewed as punishment or reward. Being from the Midwest, being cooped up in a NY apartment is not my idea of a good time. But apparently, he was released because of the cornovirus. According to the news report, Cohen is 53, in great health, and so is in a high risk category. I am assuming sarcasm should be read into this report.
It's time for … our Darwinian awards. I am assuming you all are familiar with the Darwinian Awards Concept. Charles Darwin devised this theory roughly called, "survival of the fittest." Natural selection. The idea is that over time, the strong will survive, the weak get eliminated. Apparently, Darwin would not be allowed into schools today as I am not sure "participation trophies" fit too well within this theory. The dodo bird can't re-emerge because it tried real hard.
But if this theory were applied to the legal profession, we have some awards to give out to those who will soon be departing. Yes, the weakest among us. Consider it, your participation trophy. Those lawyers who have demonstrated by their utter lack of legal acumen and common sense, that their days in the legal profession will soon be coming to an end.
So I accumulated well over 100 stories of lawyers deserving to be considered for these awards. And we cover many of these stories in my class.
But today, I want us to cover the top 3. So I have come up with my top 3. And Mackenzie, has her top 3. We have not compared notes. So let's see how we compare. Plus we'll be reviewing the movie, The Firm in this week's De-Briefing the Law.
To learn more about about Mackenzie Smith, The Aviator Attorney, click here.
We've transformed all of our continuing legal education courses so they are now available in both webinar and online formats. While we look forward to live events again in the future, we want to provide solutions for the current work environment. If you are an attorney or in the legal profession and need to complete your annual CLE requirements, visit our site Comedian of Law.
Today's episode is sponsored by Digital Directory Management. Be sure to grab your business' complimentary baseline report to see how you are showing up online. Visit http://www.digitaldirectory.management/ today!
As always, if you enjoy our Podcast, please subscribe, leave a rating or review on your favorite streaming service and follow us on social media to help others find the show.
In today’s episode, we discuss the Perjury Trap and Michael Flynn, a Florida court that gave a show cause order why a lawyer should not be removed from a case after taking his clothes off to get through security, and we look at the Supreme Court as they hear arguments on political robocalls and the Little Sisters of the Poor. All this plus a review of the movie Pelican Brief in this week's De-Briefing the Law.
The perjury trap is where law enforcement will trick a person into lying so they can be leveraged to rat someone else out. Trick a politician into lying? That’s like tricking me into eating a donut. The tricking is a step not needed.
"I think you don’t want to take your pants off in public in general." ~Mackenzie Smith
To learn more about about Mackenzie Smith, The Aviator Attorney, click here.
We've transformed all of our continuing legal education courses so they are now available in both webinar and online formats. While we look forward to live events again in the future, we want to provide solutions for the current work environment. If you are an attorney or in the legal profession and need to complete your annual CLE requirements, visit our site Comedian of Law.
Show Links:
Proper attire in the age of Zoom Lawyer who took off pants at security checkpoint fights bid to be ousted from representing clients https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/lawyer-who-took-off-pants-at-checkpoint-fights-bid-to-oust-him-from-representing-clients
Atlanta lawyer Robert Ward acknowledges that he took off his pants at a security checkpoint at a federal courthouse in Tampa, Florida.
In an April 13 opposition, Wyndham noted that U.S. District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell ordered Ward Feb. 21 to show cause why she shouldn’t revoke his pro hac vice status for taking off his pants.
Judge working from home appeared topless on Zoom https://www.legalcheek.com/2020/04/home-working-judge-appears-topless-on-zoom/
Today's episode is sponsored by Digital Directory Management. Be sure to grab your business' complimentary baseline report to see how you are showing up online. Visit http://www.digitaldirectory.management/ today!
As always, if you enjoy our Podcast, please subscribe, leave a rating or review on your favorite streaming service and follow us on social media to help others find the show.