Solving Tornadoes: Woke Meteorology: Recent Episodes
James McGinn
Exposing the incompetence of the current meteorological paradigm on storm theory and introducing a new, scientifically competent theory of storms and atmospheric flow.
Herein We Now Have A Correct Understanding of Ice
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
There is no Magic Water in my Scenario for the Physics of Storms
Cover's Meteorology's notions including Convection, Dry Layer Capping, and Latent Heat of Condensation
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
People Don't Think Simple Enough
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
From Whence Comes Low Pressure
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Broken and Completed Bonds at a Ratio of 50 50
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Storms Are Connected to Jet Streams
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Hydrogen Bonds Switch Off Polarity
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
H Bonds are Mechanism of Variable Polarity
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Almost Nobody Isn't Confused About Water
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Why Wind Shear
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
A More Precise Explanation of My Main Discovery About Water
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Mid May 2024
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
May 2024
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
January 2024
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Paradigms Often Involve Deliberate Stupidity
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
December 2023
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Narrow Range of Situational Factors Underlie Emergence of Structural Properties in the Atmosphere
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Boundary Layers Determine the Location of a Storm
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Water is the reason we have weather
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Random stuff from October 2023
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Why Meteorology Doesn't Discuss Storm Physics
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
A System of Intertwined Causes and Effects
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Meteorology Lacks Expertise in Physics of Storms
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Abbreviated Version of What is Solving Tornadoes
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Coulomb's Law and Confusion
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
What's So Great About Solving Tornadoes?
Why you might want to be a co-owner of Solving Tornadoes.
A message from CEO James McGinn
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
You Can't Get There From Here
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Why and How CO2 Became Vilified
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Huge Economic Opportunity For Those That Understand The Physics of Water
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Don't Be Fooled, Meteorology Doesn't Really Have a Model of Storms
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Paradigm of Confusion
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Why Everybody is Confused About Water
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
The Subtle Error That Has Everybody Perplexed About H2O
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Why I Am World's Number One Expert On Physics of Water, Storms, and Atmospheric Flow
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Comparing Tornadoes to Hurricanes
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
How Solving Tornadoes is able to sidestep the tangled confusion that is the current paradigm on storm theory.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
Why Part of Meteorology is Delusional and How Anyone Can Determine This For Themselves
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/james-mcginn/message
There is No Such Thing as a Science Denier
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Nonsensicality and Other Features of Modern Meteorology
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
More on Pollack and Methods of Truth
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
You Could Have Noticed
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
You Have Been Mis-educated on H2O
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
My thoughts on Gerald Pollack's Water Theory
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Slipperiness in the Atmosphere
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
One of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Six of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Five of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Four of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Three of Seven September 2022
One of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Two of Seven September 2022 Solving Tornadoes James McGinn
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
One of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Explain Convection Challenge
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Getting the Fundamentals Right with Water
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Why is the boiling temperature of H2O so incredibly variable with respect to pressure differences?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Why meteorology is phoney science.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Exposing Meteorology's Ignorance about physics of Storms
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Four Thousand Years and a Shop Vacuum
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Reverse Engineering Human Rationality
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Self Anointed Skeptics and Other Pretenders
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Traditional meteorology tells us that the role of water in the atmosphere is that it provides the energy for flow. This is mistaken. As is explained here, the proper role of water in the atmosphere is as the basis for the structure that focusses the flow to achieve streaming.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Traditional Storm Theory is Scripture
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
A simple way to test veracity of convection.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 6:52:18 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 02-Jan-22 1:48 pm, James McGinn wrote:
On Saturday, January 1, 2022 at 6:11:49 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 31-Dec-21 3:36 pm, James McGinn wrote:
Remember, all of the moisture in earth's atmosphere is liquid H2O.
The atmosphere is too cool for gaseous H2O. If anybody suggests
otherwise ask them to provide you the reproducible experimental
evidence. They won't be able to do it--just as you were not able to.
What's the smallest possible size of a droplet of water?
Sylvia.
Two.
Two what?
Oh, sorry, two H2O molecules.
But Sylvia, in order to provide you more comprehensive information on
this exciting topic, here is a link to a special podcast entitled Response
to Sylvia Else:
James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
Always remember: Just because it's not all about you doesn't mean you have to believe that.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Belief in Science is an Obstacle to Progress
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
The Momentum of the Jet Stream is Maintained by Vortice Activity
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Sympathy to those who are incredulous of the Spinning Nanodroplets of Vortice Plasma
I do understand how people can be incredulous when the first encounter the notion of spinning polymers of H2O on wind shear boundaries
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Meteorology's Blatant Dishonesty is Unknown to the Public
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Another thing Meteorology doesn't want the public to realize
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Water is the source of the structure of the atmosphere.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
We have to understand water first. When we do understand water its role in storms will become clear.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Why Water Science is a Goat Road
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
9/15/2020 48 min 9/30/2020 37 min and 17 min
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
H2O polarity is variable and not constant.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Reference: Claudius Denk
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Reference: Ideological Ape Hypothesis by Claudius Denk
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Lotsa stuff bout storms an water
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=360#p125466
I discovered the empirical shortcomings of meteorology after I discovered them in climatology. My reasoning was very simple. Knowing that the origins of climatology are in meteorology, I reasoned that if AGW is as bad as it appears then meteorology must also have skeletons in its closet. So I did something that nobody has done before, I looked at the convection model of storm theory with scrutiny. I found numerous fatal flaws and I found that meteorologists have long ago established a tradition of ignoring these fatal flaws.
My point is that you/we cannot defeat a conversational science based on empiricism because conversational sciences are based on allegories that appeal to the base sensations of the public. The only way to defeat a conversational science is to reveal it as such to the public. And the best way to reveal it to the public is to start with meteorology since this is the spring from which it sprang (or is it sprung?). The conversational tradition is the problem and its roots are in meteorology, not climatology.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=360#p125466
I discovered the empirical shortcomings of meteorology after I discovered them in climatology. My reasoning was very simple. Knowing that the origins of climatology are in meteorology, I reasoned that if AGW is as bad as it appears then meteorology must also have skeletons in its closet. So I did something that nobody has done before, I looked at the convection model of storm theory with scrutiny. I found numerous fatal flaws and I found that meteorologists have long ago established a tradition of ignoring these fatal flaws.
My point is that you/we cannot defeat a conversational science based on empiricism because conversational sciences are based on allegories that appeal to the base sensations of the public. The only way to defeat a conversational science is to reveal it as such to the public. And the best way to reveal it to the public is to start with meteorology since this is the spring from which it sprang (or is it sprung?). The conversational tradition is the problem and its roots are in meteorology, not climatology.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Is the H2O Puzzle Solved?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=60#p114924
For example, do you concur with the notion that moist air contains gaseous H2O? Yes? No? Do you dispute my assertion that this notion is nonsense? Yes? No? Undoubtedly we will never know because, like all science pretenders, you are determined to ride the fence, play it safe. And that is too bad. Science isn’t about looking or even being right. It’s about being specific so that if you are wrong you can realize you are wrong when you are wrong. Because realizing you are wrong when you are wrong is the hardest part of any scientific endeavor. More than anything else, science is about defeating your minds desire to take the easy path and just believe.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=60#p114924
For example, do you concur with the notion that moist air contains gaseous H2O? Yes? No? Do you dispute my assertion that this notion is nonsense? Yes? No? Undoubtedly we will never know because, like all science pretenders, you are determined to ride the fence, play it safe. And that is too bad. Science isn’t about looking or even being right. It’s about being specific so that if you are wrong you can realize you are wrong when you are wrong. Because realizing you are wrong when you are wrong is the hardest part of any scientific endeavor. More than anything else, science is about defeating your minds desire to take the easy path and just believe.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=165#p122167
The 'plasma' of my model is novel, unfamiliar and, therefore, hard to accept. But that is the case for any scientific discovery. Alfred Wegener proposed continental drift in 1912. It took geologists 50 years to warm up to the idea. Now, however, when you look at a map of the southern Atlantic ocean the congruence of the eastern and western shorelines jumps out at you. When it came to deducing the molecular composition of atmospheric vortices and arriving at the conjecture that they contained wind shear generated, rapidly spinning polymers of H2O, I feel that I had a huge advantage that allowed me to avoid a common misassumption that traps others. I knew that the sheath of the tornado must involve some kind of molecular distinction.
These principles prevented me from making the common error of casually assuming that the molecular composition of tornadoes was the same as that of air and/or moist air. I've encountered a number of other tornado theorists and it is very common for them to casually assume that a tornado is just fast spinning air. They don't take into account the fact that the sheath needed to possess the ability to resist itself from casually mixing with the surrounding air molecules. In other words, my principles of entitiness allowed me to realize that tornadoes could not persist as entities if the molecules that comprise the sheath of the tornado did not possess some kind of internal resilience greater than that of just air. Otherwise the molecules in the sheath would casually mix with those outside the sheath and the tornado would not have persistence.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=210#p122376
You can’t understand tornadoes (and/or jet streams) unless and until you understand how the composition of the sheath of a tornado is molecularly distinct from that of the air that surrounds it and that moves up through it.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=255#p122459
Vortices are conduits that tunnel through the friction and general incoherence of the gases in the atmosphere, powered by differences in pressure/temperature between different locations on the surface of the planet, the are constructed from layers of spinning microdroplets of liquid H2O. The resulting sheath of a vortice is a consequence of the principle that maximization of the surface area of H2O maximizes these tensional forces. These conduits emerge along moist dry wind shear boundaries, especially those associated with the extensive, flat boundary between the top of the troposphere and the bottom of the stratosphere, prime conditions for wind shear. The ensuing vortices of surface tension maximized spinning microdroplets provide a slick hydrophobic inner surface that channels moist air at speeds up to 300 mph.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Groupthink is a big part of how the human brain functions. Typically, when somebody relays information to you and that information carries an assumption you will also carry the same assumption. And this happens on a subconscious level such that you are hardly aware of it.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
s
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
sadfsfdg
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Global Warming is . . .
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
The discussion involves the validity of three concepts associated with Meteorology's Model of Storms: 1) Convectioin 2)Dry Layer Capping and 3) Latent Heat. The claim here is that these are all story-telling tactics and do no represent valid physics/science.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Words have meaning. Sometimes words have meanings. Sometimes some scientist use this ambivalence as a tactic to get you to believe that they understand what they don't.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Defeating the Bias of Being a Living organism
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Meteorologists Refuse to Discuss Details of their Intentionally Vague Hypothesis on Storms. I am happy to discuss details of my theory, which depends on advanced understanding of hydrogen bonding in water.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
How Kobe Bryant and Linus Pauling Are Connected By Tragedy
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Response to Brendon Regarding greenhouse effect, convection model of storms, and Joe Postma of Climate Of Sophistry
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=255#p122459
Jet streams are conduits that tunnel through the friction and general incoherence of the gases in the atmosphere to balance out what would otherwise be some extremes of heat/high pressures and cold/low pressures. Constructed from layers of spinning microdroplets of H2O with maximized surface tension, jet streams are a consequence of the principle that maximization of the surface area of H2O maximizes the tensional forces of H2O. These conduits emerge along moist dry wind shear boundaries, especially those associated with the extensive, flat boundary between the top of the troposphere and the bottom of the stratosphere, prime conditions for wind shear. The ensuing vortices of surface tension maximized spinning microdroplets provide a slick hydrophobic inner surface that channels moist air at speeds up to 300 mph.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=270#p122469
One can only imagine how you envision the consensus. Academia is mostly concerned with the politics of keeping the flow of funding flowing. Scientific theories (models) are just a means to that end. And that often means that scientific institutions adopt a model and employ all kinds of political tactics to evade scrutiny of their model. It can also mean that they will dumb down their model so that it appeals to the lowest common denominator of the voting public.
For example. The following is an attempt by professional meteorologists to admonish journalists for using the phrase "clash of air masses," in regard to journalists' attempts to explain the origins of tornadoes to the public:
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
We all grow up believing that the moisture in clear air is gaseous
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16471
Most of us have at least enough education to realize the boiling point of water is much higher than that of our ambient environment. And most of us realize that boiling has to do with a phase change from a liquid state of matter to a gaseous state of matter. Most of us reconcile this dichotomy by just not thinking about it. Some of us come up with rationalization to explain it away. But if you are going to do science you can't fall back on these excuses. You have to see things for what they actually are.
There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere.
Moist air is heavier than dry air.
Moist air convection is impossible.
Meteorology needs another way to explain the power of storms, why storms are wet, and how heavier moist air gets so high in earth's atmosphere.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw
James McGinn
Solving Tornadoes
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Video/Book: Confessions Of A Climate Change Denier
https://principia-scientific.org/video-book-confessions-of-a-climate-change-denier/
If you want to be entertained as well as educated on what ‘Slayer’ science is all about when it comes to debunking the greenhouse gas theory, then check out the work of Stephen Wells. A Brit now living in Australia, Wells has emerged into the spotlight with a marvelous new book and lively video debate with a top lukewarmer professor.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=150#p119465
Humans are delusional about H2O. And this delusion results in the following: 1) humans generally believe that H2O is simple and obvious and, 2) humans believe that our understanding of H2O is comprehensive and accurate, both in science and in general. The reality is that neither of these are true. Neither of these is remotely true. H2O is extremely complex and poorly understood by science. Currently there exists over 70 anomalies of H2O. That is 70 different observations about H2O (under various conditions) that are inconsistent with or completely unpredicted by theory. However, human delusion runs so deep that the meaning of anomaly has been altered in the context of H2O to essentially serve as an excuse for why theories of H2O fail to explain what is actually observed.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Meteorology is propaganda, not science.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Superstition and half-baked theory dominate the atmospheric sciences. Currently meteorological theories on atmospheric flow and storms maintain three superstitious and half-baked notions: 1) Convection. This is the superstition that evaporation makes air buoyant enough to power strong updrafts in the atmosphere (included in this is the strange belief that H2O in the atmosphere becomes gaseous at temperatures/pressures that have never been detected in a laboratory); 2) Dry layer capping. This is a superstition that imagines dry layers having structural properties that explain the how/why convection does not constantly produce storms and uplift; 3) Latent heat. This is the superstition that phase changes from a gaseous phase of H2O (which are purported to exist despite never having been detected and being inconsistent with what is indicated in the H2O phase table) to a liquid phase releases "latent heat" which itself has never been confirmed/verified. This was recorded 11/16/2019, or thereabouts.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Superstition and half-baked theory dominate the atmospheric sciences. Currently meteorological theories on atmospheric flow and storms maintain three superstitious and half-baked notions: 1) Convection. This is the superstition that evaporation makes air buoyant enough to power strong updrafts in the atmosphere (included in this is the strange belief that H2O in the atmosphere becomes gaseous at temperatures/pressures that have never been detected in a laboratory); 2) Dry layer capping. This is a superstition that imagines dry layers having structural properties that explain the how/why convection does not constantly produce storms and uplift; 3) Latent heat. This is the superstition that phase changes from a gaseous phase of H2O (which are purported to exist despite never having been detected and being inconsistent with what is indicated in the H2O phase table) to a liquid phase releases "latent heat" which itself has never been confirmed/verified. In accordance with which, the current meteorological paradigm assumes hurricanes are caused by warm water. Actually the energy of hurricanes and all storms comes from jet streams and is delivered through vortices in the form of low pressure. Wind shear at low altitudes is the most important predictor of severe weather. This is because wind shear is the mechanism underlying growth of the vortices that are the transport mechanism of the low pressure energy. Warm moist air/water is not the source of the energy of storms, it's the target of vortice growth. The 'Missing Link' of Meteorology's Theory of Storms http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329 James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=270#p122469
One can only imagine how you envision the consensus. Academia is mostly concerned with the politics of keeping the flow of funding flowing. Scientific theories (models) are just a means to that end. And that often means that scientific institutions adopt a model and employ all kinds of political tactics to evade scrutiny of their model. It can also mean that they will dumb down their model so that it appeals to the lowest common denominator of the voting public.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=165#p122167
The 'plasma' of my model is novel, unfamiliar and, therefore, hard to accept. But that is the case for any scientific discovery. Alfred Wegener proposed continental drift in 1912. It took geologists 50 years to warm up to the idea. Now, however, when you look at a map of the southern Atlantic ocean the congruence of the eastern and western shorelines jumps out at you. When it came to deducing the molecular composition of atmospheric vortices and arriving at the conjecture that they contained wind shear generated, rapidly spinning polymers of H2O, I feel that I had a huge advantage that allowed me to avoid a common misassumption that traps others. I knew that the sheath of the tornado must involve some kind of molecular distinction.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=150#p119465
Humans are delusional about H2O. And this delusion results in the following: 1) humans generally believe that H2O is simple and obvious and, 2) humans believe that our understanding of H2O is comprehensive and accurate, both in science and in general. The reality is that neither of these are true. Neither of these is remotely true. H2O is extremely complex and poorly understood by science. Currently there exists over 70 anomalies of H2O. That is 70 different observations about H2O (under various conditions) that are inconsistent with or completely unpredicted by theory. However, human delusion runs so deep that the meaning of anomaly has been altered in the context of H2O to essentially serve as an excuse for why theories of H2O fail to explain what is actually observed.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Title: Elasticity of Hydrogen Bonds Underlies Spinning of Polymerized H2O Molecules On Wind Sheer Boundaries Which Underlies Emergence of Vortice Plasma
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=360#p123034
The sheath of a tornado is a form of surface tension. It is a plasma of spinning, churning H2O molecules. It has structural strength and a surface—common characteristics of plasmas. But the origin of this strength doesn’t involve the forces associated with ionic bonds, as is the case with most plasmas. Instead this is a kind of plasma that involves the forces associated with hydrogen bonds. I thought of it as surface tension that is expressed in three dimensions—surface tension on steroids!
I conjectured that hydrogen bonds must be distinctive from covalent or ionic bonds in that with hydrogen bonds the force that creates the bond must be deactivated by the bond itself. And so, whereas with a covalent bond or an ionic bond the force that brings them together remains, with hydrogen bonds the force that brings them together is deactivated--neutralized. Accordingly, the fewer bonds that an H2O molecule shares with other H2O molecules the stronger are these bonds. Conversely, the greater were the number of bonds an H2O molecule shared with other H2O molecules the weaker were these bonds—all the way down to having zero strength when fully bonded.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=165#p122133
the plasma in this article is very different from the plasma in my model. The plasma in my model is, actually, a combination of air and nanodroplets of H2O. Or, I should say, that is how it starts out; also, in my model these H2O nanodroplets are spinning very rapidly. The spinning is a consequence of wind shear. (Did you ever wonder why tornadoes are associated with wind shear in the lower troposphere? Well, keep reading.)
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Public http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=210#p122351
In the 1950s they considered ways to potentially stop or steer a hurricane . . .
I believe hurricanes can be steered and even stopped. And the way to do so involves attacking them where they are most vulnerable, at the boundary layer in the tropopause that is the raw material for the vortices that deliver the energy of storms.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=360#p123034
The sheath of a tornado is a form of surface tension. It is a plasma of spinning, churning H2O molecules. It has structural strength and a surface—common characteristics of plasmas. But the origin of this strength doesn’t involve the forces associated with ionic bonds, as is the case with most plasmas. Instead this is a kind of plasma that involves the forces associated with hydrogen bonds. I thought of it as surface tension that is expressed in three dimensions—surface tension on steroids!
conjectured that hydrogen bonds must be distinctive from covalent or ionic bonds in that with hydrogen bonds the force that creates the bond must be deactivated by the bond itself. And so, whereas with a covalent bond or an ionic bond the force that brings them together remains, with hydrogen bonds the force that brings them together is deactivated--neutralized. Accordingly, the fewer bonds that an H2O molecule shares with other H2O molecules the stronger are these bonds. Conversely, the greater were the number of bonds an H2O molecule shared with other H2O molecules the weaker were these bonds—all the way down to having zero strength when fully bonded.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Here is what you don't get about science and truth.
Humans have a deep-seated emotional need to believe they understand their world and there is a lot of money to be made fulfilling that need. And since most science consumers don't have the time or the education to put much effort into it, the most money can be made giving these science consumers excuses for why they don't actually have to literally understand it. And so--for reasons of fiscal necessity--many scientific disciplines have dumbed down their models to go with the flow of what people want to believe.
It is for this reason that there are certain concepts in every scientific discipline that are sacred. Their validity is beyond dispute and cannot be contradicted without the person being shunned by the larger discipline. Or, more simply put, certain subjects are taboo.
The anomalies of H2O are a severe embarrassment to all of the scientific disciplines in which water plays a central role. And, obviously, this includes all of the natural sciences but also physics and chemistry. The misconceptions associated with these anomalies are central to all of the various disciplines in the natural sciences.
This results in a consensus of obnoxious dunces in the natural sciences. These nitwits dismiss and evade contradictions that conflict with these artificially simplistic models. Like martyrs to a religious cause, they are willing to sacrifice their own reputation in order to preserve the perceived sanctity of their science-based beliefs.
Stupidity lies at the heart of most traditional notions in the natural sciences.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Correction to The Current Model of Hydrogen Bonding in Water
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=17448
Understanding the intrinsic elasticity of hydrogen bonds between H2O molecules in liquid water involves three insights:
1) Firstly one must comprehend that the force that brings H2O molecules together (polarity) is a result of the asymmetry (lopsidedness) of the H2O molecule's electromagnetic signature.
2) Secondly one must comprehend that hydrogen bonds between water molecules reverse this electromagnetic asymmetry achieving electromagnetic symmetry (balance) thereby neutralizing some fraction (see below) of the magnitude of this force.
3) Lastly one must comprehend how this neutralization is relative (according to proximity) and fractional, a maximum of 25% per bond as each H2O molecule can form a hydrogen bond with up to four other H2O molecules in its vicinity, potentially neutralizing up to 100% (4 x 25%) of each other's polarity.
In short, the magnitude of polarity of H2O molecules in liquid water is inversely related to their interconnectedness. The more interconnected they are (the more comprehensively they are hydrogen bonded to one another) the lower is their polarity. And since polarity determines the magnitude of the force that attracts them to one another, the more interconnected they are the less is the magnitude of the force that keeps them together.
Through this understanding most of the anomalies of H2O are easily resolved. And from this we can understand where conventional theorists failed when it comes to understanding water. It is very simple. They understood #1 and they understood the parts of #3 that are not effected by #2 but they completely dropped the ball when it comes to comprehend #2. Simply put, they failed to comprehend that hydrogen bonds bring electrical gradients that oppose and, thereby, cancel out the electrical gradients that cause the H2O molecule's polarity.
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message
Superstition and half-baked theory dominate the atmospheric sciences. Currently meteorological theories on atmospheric flow and storms maintain three superstitious and half-baked notions: 1) Convection. This is the superstition that evaporation makes air buoyant enough to power strong updrafts in the atmosphere (included in this is the strange belief that H2O in the atmosphere becomes gaseous at temperatures/pressures that have never been detected in a laboratory); 2) Dry layer capping. This is a superstition that imagines dry layers having structural properties that explain the how/why convection does not constantly produce storms and uplift; 3) Latent heat. This is the superstition that phase changes from a gaseous phase of H2O (which are purported to exist despite never having been detected and being inconsistent with what is indicated in the H2O phase table) to a liquid phase releases "latent heat" which itself has never been confirmed/verified.
In accordance with which, the current meteorological paradigm assumes hurricanes are caused by warm water. Actually the energy of hurricanes and all storms comes from jet streams and is delivered through vortices in the form of low pressure. Wind shear at low altitudes is the most important predictor of severe weather. This is because wind shear is the mechanism underlying growth of the vortices that are the transport mechanism of the low pressure energy. Warm moist air/water is not the source of the energy of storms, it's the target of vortice growth.
The 'Missing Link' of Meteorology's Theory of Storms
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329
James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/message