Mindframe(s): Recent Episodes
Dave Canfield and Michael Cockerill
Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026) Directed by: Destin Daniel Cretton Written by: Chris McKenna & Erik Sommers (based on the Marvel comic by Stan Lee & Steve Ditko) Starring: Tom Holland, Zendaya, Sadie Sink, Jacob Batalon, Jon Bernthal, Michael Mando, Mark Ruffalo, Liza Colón-Zayas, Florence Pugh IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt22084616/
Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave discuss Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026), a soft-reboot superhero film that finds Peter Parker fighting crime full-time in a New York that no longer remembers he exists.
The discussion explores whether the film's quieter, more introspective first act successfully re-energizes a fatigued genre, the wisdom of internalizing Spider-Man's central struggle as his own spider-DNA begins to take over ("spider puberty"), and a plot the hosts agree is overstuffed with characters and motivations. Along the way: Jon Bernthal's softened Punisher, Sadie Sink's tangential villain, an unnecessary Hulk, and some of the most aggressive BMW product placement either host can remember. Reference points include Sam Raimi, The Empire Strikes Back, and the boring-superhero cautionary tales of Superman Returns and Man of Steel.
On-air verdicts: Dave — 4/5. Michael — 3/5. (Dave really enjoyed it; Michael landed mixed — "10% greatness, 90% mid" — praising the third act while faulting the loaded first two.)
Thematic Discussion Spider-Man: Brand New Day explores loneliness, and the idea that community is vulnerability.
The film suggests that even with superhuman strength, no one gets through isolation alone — that reaching out, being earnest, and letting people back in is the actual work, and the only real cure. Peter erased himself from everyone he loved to keep them safe; the film argues that choice was the wound, not the protection. Both hosts landed on the thematic point being earned: the melancholy is felt, the reconnection with Ned and MJ is left meaningfully ambiguous rather than reset, and Sadie Sink's character works as a dark-mirror counterpoint — the same loss, but a person who pushes everyone away instead.
Timestamps Time Segment 00:00 Intro & setup 02:59 The soft reboot: smart move or gimmick? 07:28 Jon Bernthal's Punisher 10:55 The cast: Ned, the villains, a Benedict Wong tangent 14:36 Technical analysis: look, sound, pacing & product placement 24:02 An overstuffed plot and thin villain motivation 25:43 Director context: Raimi, Empire, and Cretton's roots 27:27 Spoiler-free verdicts 35:18 Spoiler section begins 35:29 Thematic deep dive: loneliness & connection as vulnerability 39:16 Is the ending earned? The Ned handshake debate 43:51 Set design, Jean Grey as counterpoint, "I'm both" 48:34 The banya scene: playing with vulnerability 53:41 Closing thoughts & what's next Films & Directors Mentioned * Sam Raimi / the Raimi Spider-Man films * The Empire Strikes Back * Destin Daniel Cretton — Short Term 12, Just Mercy, Shang-Chi * Superman Returns, Man of Steel, Godzilla (the "boring superhero" cautionary tales) * Bryan Singer — X-Men, X2, Apt Pupil * Supergirl, Fantastic Four * Iron Man & Watchmen (iconic mask removals) * Doctor Strange (Benedict Wong) * Baby Driver, The Odyssey, Weapons, Marco Polo, Breaking Bad, Stranger Things
Contact Web: https://mindframesfilm.com Facebook: Mindframes Network: Now Playing Network Email: info@mindframesfilm.com
The Odyssey (2026) Directed by: Christopher Nolan Written by: Christopher Nolan Starring: Matt Damon, Anne Hathaway, Tom Holland, Robert Pattinson, Charlize Theron, Samantha Morton, Zendaya, Lupita Nyong'o, Elliot Page, John Leguizamo, Benny Safdie, Jon Bernthal, Himesh Patel, Mia Goth, Bill Irwin, Travis Scott IMDB: [IMDB LINK]
Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave discuss The Odyssey (2026), Christopher Nolan's three-hour adaptation of Homer — a $250 million epic and the first narrative feature shot entirely on IMAX 70mm.
The discussion covers Nolan as an auteur and whether the "never made a bad movie" claim holds up, the practical-effects approach to the Cyclops and Circe, the deliberately cold Northern palette imposed on the Mediterranean, Ludwig Göransson's score, and an ensemble so large the hosts concede they can't get to everyone. After the ratings, the spoiler section turns to the film's central choice: the Olympian gods have been removed while the monsters remain, and what that does to Odysseus' moral agency.
Comparisons range across Nolan's own filmography, Troy, The Northman, and the sword-and-sandal epics of the 1950s and '60s.
Reviews Michael: 4.5 / 5 — came out thinking four, and it has only grown in his esteem since. Praises the baseline of visual and musical quality, Damon working better as a lead than expected, and a supporting cast that carries every stop on the journey. Docks it for a cast so crowded it distracts, and for an ending too in love with its own moralism.
Dave: 4.5 / 5 — would watch it again in a heartbeat. Calls it a film that grabs hold of empire, heroism, reverence, and humility all at once, and rates the separation of gods from monsters as pitch perfect. His one dent in the fender: the film plays a little episodic, a series of very large encounters rather than a single build.
Thematic Discussion The Odyssey removes the Olympians but keeps the monsters. Circe, the Sirens, and the Cyclops are all simply part of the natural world here; it's Athena and Zeus who stay shadowy and inferred. Michael's reading is that this absence exists to hand moral agency back to Odysseus — if the gods were visibly steering, his guilt over the Trojan Horse wouldn't be his to carry.
That guilt is framed through xenia, the Greek code of hospitality. Odysseus offered a gift that turned out to be murder, and comes to believe that breaking that norm is what set his civilization's collapse in motion. The hosts draw the parallel to the erosion of political and social norms in contemporary America, and to the film's closing turn — the Bronze Age is ending because of the Sea Peoples, and the Greeks realize they are the Sea Peoples.
The episode's central disagreement is over Athena. Dave reads her as constructed: she wears the face of a priestess Odysseus watched his own men murder in her temple, and the film is showing how humans build gods out of guilt and the sense that something is sacred. Michael pushes back that the film sustains a genuine ambiguity — the idea that gods appear in human form is planted repeatedly, and the priestess is decapitated at the exact moment Athena's statue is, which leaves open that Odysseus may believe they killed a god. He points to the same ambiguity in the Cyclops' cry to Poseidon, which some of the crew claim to hear and neither Odysseus nor the audience does.
Neither host resolves it, and both prefer it that way. Michael's position is that the ambiguity is the answer rather than the absence of one — something underpins their world that they don't fully see and are damaging anyway, whether that's Zeus and Poseidon or simply decency and the value of human life. Dave, arriving from a position of religious faith, says he likes that Odysseus has to live in the same uncertain world the rest of us do.
The structural evidence they land on: Homer ends with a deus ex machina, Athena descending to stop the cycle of revenge. Nolan cuts it. Nobody intervenes, so Odysseus abdicates, gives the throne to Telemachus, and sails west with Penelope — a change that hands the ending's moral weight entirely to the man.
Timestamps Time Segment 00:00 Intro & setup 05:08 Nolan's filmography — is he an auteur? 08:51 Practical filmmaking and visual style 09:37 IMAX 70mm and the limits of the format 14:40 Hoyte van Hoytema 17:16 Why the Mediterranean looks cold 19:39 Ludwig Göransson's score 25:20 Travis Scott, the bard, and the casting discourse 28:56 The ensemble 39:39 Reviews & ratings 49:56 Spoiler section begins 52:18 Xenia and the collapse of norms 54:50 The gods and moral agency 56:12 The Athena reveal 1:01:46 The case for ambiguity 1:05:03 "We're the Sea Peoples" 1:09:02 The ending Nolan changed 1:19:36 Final interpretation debate — are the gods there? 1:26:49 Closing thoughts Films & Directors Mentioned * Memento — Christopher Nolan * Inception — Christopher Nolan * The Prestige — Christopher Nolan * Interstellar — Christopher Nolan * Dunkirk — Christopher Nolan * Tenet — Christopher Nolan * Oppenheimer — Christopher Nolan * Troy * The Northman * Dune * Saving Private Ryan * Fruitvale Station — Ryan Coogler * Creed — Ryan Coogler * Black Panther — Ryan Coogler * Sinners — Ryan Coogler * Minority Report * The Whale * Anemone * Disclosure Day — Steven Spielberg * Barbie * Michael * John Ford and Monument Valley * Hans Zimmer * The sword-and-sandal epics of the 1950s and '60s
Contact Web: https://mindframesfilm.com Facebook: Mindframes Network: Now Playing Network Email: info@mindframesfilm.com
Mindframes Show Notes Episode 121 — Disclosure Day (2026) Directed by: Steven Spielberg Written by: David Koepp Starring: Emily Blunt, Josh O'Connor, Colin Firth, Colman Domingo, Eve Hewson, Wyatt Russell IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt15047880/
Special guest: Tarek Fayoumi (movieswithtarek.com), director of the Chicago Independent Film Critics.
Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave — joined by returning guest Tarek Fayoumi — discuss Disclosure Day (2026), Steven Spielberg's return to the alien genre and his first big sci-fi swing since War of the Worlds.
The conversation works through Spielberg's recurring obsessions (renegade heroes, shadowy government forces, ordinary people swept into something enormous), Janusz Kamiński's return to the diffused-light, lens-flare look, and John Williams' 30th collaboration with the director — before splitting hard over whether the film's hopeful thesis actually lands. Comparisons run from Close Encounters of the Third Kind, E.T., and War of the Worlds to Contact, Minority Report, and Coppola's Megalopolis as a fellow "late master with something to say."
Verdicts split three ways: Michael 2.5/5, Dave 3/5, Tarek 4/4.
Thematic Discussion Disclosure Day asks whether an undeniable, truthful image can still unite people in a cynical age — Brian Tallerico's "undeniable image" framing, run through the show's central question: not is there proof? but does proof still work on us?
Michael argues the truthful image isn't wounded but dead — a shared reality the film is nostalgic for, but one that no longer functions when people deny what they're shown. Dave counters that the film's real hope is empathy and human-to-human connection replacing the broken image, while conceding Spielberg doesn't earn that buy-in the way his early work did. The film ends not on a revelation but on Margaret turning to the camera, saying "Listen," and cutting to black — proof getting humanity to the threshold, with faith and empathy left to carry it the rest of the way.
Timestamps Note: recording was split into two files; Part 2 times below assume the parts run continuously (Part 2 offset by ~50:03). Verify against the stitched audio.
Time Segment 00:15 Intro & setup; welcoming guest Tarek Fayoumi 02:33 Spielberg as a director — recurring themes 03:21 Premise & the Wardex setup (spoiler-free) 08:43 Return to the alien genre vs. his recent dramas 10:01 Cinematography — Kamiński, lens flares, the "awe" look 28:12 John Williams' 30th collaboration; film & score preservation 31:17 Spoiler-free reviews begin 31:47 Michael's review (2.5/5) 38:47 Dave's review (3/5) 43:02 Tarek's review (4/4) ~45:10 Spoiler section begins ~45:42 The alien reveal & the decades of "disclosure" footage ~55:27 Thematic debate: empathy vs. the image ~56:08 "The truthful image is dead" — Michael's core position ~60:17 The ending: "Listen" and the cut to black ~74:31 Closing thoughts — can we still believe in a unifying image? ~74:56 Next episode tease Films & Directors Mentioned * Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Steven Spielberg) * E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (Steven Spielberg) * War of the Worlds (Steven Spielberg) * A.I. Artificial Intelligence (Steven Spielberg) * Minority Report (Steven Spielberg) * Jaws (Steven Spielberg) * Schindler's List / Saving Private Ryan (Steven Spielberg) * The Terminal / Catch Me If You Can (Steven Spielberg) * The Fabelmans / West Side Story (Steven Spielberg) * Jurassic Park / Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (David Koepp & Spielberg) * Contact (Robert Zemeckis / Carl Sagan) * Explorers (Joe Dante) * 2001: A Space Odyssey (Stanley Kubrick) * Megalopolis (Francis Ford Coppola) * Super 8 (J.J. Abrams) * Watching the Skies (Norwegian sci-fi) * Poltergeist / Gremlins (Spielberg-produced, 1980s) * The Outer Limits — "The Architects of Fear"
Contact Web: https://mindframesfilm.com Facebook: Mindframes Network: Now Playing Network Email: info@mindframesfilm.com
Mindframes Show Notes Obsession (2026) Directed by: Curry Barker Written by: Curry Barker Starring: Michael Johnston, Inde Navarrette, Cooper Tomlinson, Megan Lawless, Andy Richter IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt37287335/
Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave dig into Obsession (2026), Curry Barker's micro-budget feature debut that turned into one of the biggest horror phenomenons in years — a $750K film bought for $15 million out of TIFF that went on to gross well over $148 million worldwide, growing at the box office in consecutive weekends rather than declining.
The discussion explores the film's monkey's-paw premise, its working-class Gen Z setting, the moral architecture of Bear's wish, and the central question of whether Bear is the film's actual villain — while comparing the film to Weapons, Pearl, Get Out, The Witch, and Isaac Asimov's Foundation and Empire.
Thematic Discussion Obsession explores consent and agency — what happens when desire is granted without consent.
The film suggests that Bear doesn't earn or deserve Nikki's love; he eliminates her will and replaces it with his own. As Curry Barker has put it, "love is earned, not demanded," and "any time you wish for something, it's probably going to be selfish." The true engine of the horror isn't the curse twisting the wish — it's that the wish works exactly as asked.
On-air verdict — Is Bear the villain? Both hosts landed on no. He's flawed, selfish, and prolongs the harm once he knows better, but he's the story's antagonist rather than its villain — if anyone is the "real" villain, it's the cursed object itself. Michael's framing: not every flawed person is a villain, and the film is more interesting because its characters are layered rather than purely good or evil.
On-air verdict — the ending. Dave correctly intuited that Nikki originally killed herself in an earlier draft — that actually was Barker's original Romeo-and-Juliet mutual-suicide ending, before his playwright father pushed him toward the survival cut used in the final film. Michael argued the survival ending is more thematically persuasive: if the theme is one person's coercion of another's agency, the resolution should be Nikki's, not a mutual destruction that treats the harm as shared. Bear's selfishness has to die for Nikki to live.
A live reference worth flagging for listeners: Michael cited Naomi Serpell's New Yorker piece "The New Literalism" (March 2025) as a framework for questioning how intentionally — and how literally — modern horror handles its themes of trauma and control.
⏱️ Timestamps Time Segment 00:01 Intro & setup 00:03 Director background — Curry Barker, box office story 00:09 Cinematography & cast discussion 00:30 Reviews & ratings 00:41 ⚠️ Spoiler section begins — "What would you wish for?" 00:44 Thematic discussion: consent and agency 00:45 Is Bear the villain? 01:01 The ending — survival vs. the original Romeo & Juliet cut 01:13 The New Literalism / intentionality debate 01:22 Closing thoughts & next episode 🎞️ Films & Directors Mentioned * Weapons / Barbarian (Zach Cregger) * Pearl (Ti West / Mia Goth) — Barker has cited this as a major influence * Get Out (Jordan Peele) * The Witch (Robert Eggers) * Backrooms (Kane Parsons) * Hurry Up Tomorrow (Jenna Ortega) * Isaac Asimov's Foundation and Empire
📬 Contact 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com 📘 Facebook: Mindframes 🎧 Now Playing Network ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com
Backrooms (2026) Directed by: Kane Parsons Written by: Will Sudick Starring: Chiwetel Ejiofor, Renate Reinsve, Mark Duplass, Finn Bennett, Lukita Maxwell IMDB: Backrooms (2026)
Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave discuss Backrooms (2026), an A24 horror film directed by 20-year-old YouTube filmmaker and wunderkind Kane Parsons — believed to be the youngest person to ever direct a widely released feature film.
The discussion covers the film's expansion of the internet liminal space phenomenon into a feature-length narrative, its Tarkovsky-esque atmosphere, and the remarkable work of cinematographer Jeremy Cox and production designer Danny Vermette in bringing 30,000 square feet of meticulously constructed sets to life. The conversation digs deep into why liminal spaces resonate so powerfully with contemporary audiences — and with Gen Z in particular — framing the backrooms not just as a horror setting but as a cultural symptom of a society in uneasy transition.
Both hosts award the film five stars, with Michael calling it the best film he's seen this year.
🧠 Thematic Discussion Backrooms explores the psychology of liminal space — transitional, empty environments that feel familiar yet deeply wrong — and uses them as an externalization of Clark's inability to move on from divorce, grief, and unresolved anger.
The film suggests that the backrooms are not merely a supernatural threat, but a space that reflects what we bring into it. Clark, living inside his furniture store rather than moving forward with his life, is already inhabiting a kind of liminal space before he ever finds the portal. The backrooms literalize his psychological stasis. The key scene where Mary stops being a detached therapist and tells Clark plainly that the problem is not where he is but that he refuses to move — functions as the film's emotional thesis.
More broadly, the episode argues that our collective fascination with liminal spaces is less allegory or conscious metaphor and more a psychological aesthetic symptom: these spaces — fluorescent-lit, carpeted, emptied of purpose — resonate because they look like the places our society is abandoning, and feel like the threshold we are all standing on. The backrooms are what happens when transitional space becomes permanent home.
⏱️ Timestamps Time Segment 00:00 Intro & welcome ~02:00 Introducing Backrooms and Kane Parsons ~04:00 Plot overview & synopsis ~05:30 The liminal space / backrooms internet phenomenon ~07:30 Cast discussion — Chiwetel Ejiofor, Renate Reinsve, Mark Duplass, Finn Bennett, Lukita Maxwell ~15:30 Technical analysis — sound design, cinematography, production design ~26:00 ⚠️ Spoiler-free reviews — Michael & Dave both award 5 stars ~35:00 ⚠️ SPOILER SECTION BEGINS ~35:00 Defining liminal spaces — film history, David Lynch, The Shining, Stalker, Annihilation ~43:00 Why liminal spaces scare us — uncanny valley, psychological resonance ~49:00 Why now? Cultural anxiety, societal transition, the doom-scrolling generation ~54:00 Clark's arc — psychological stasis, avoidance, the backrooms as mirror ~60:00 Mary's arc — confronting pain as the path out ~62:00 The scientists / MRI company — and fears for Backrooms 2 ~68:00 A24, Neon, Cannes, and closing tangents ~70:00 Closing thoughts & contact info 🎞️ Films & Directors Mentioned * Stalker (1979) — Andrei Tarkovsky * Solaris (1972) — Andrei Tarkovsky * Annihilation (2018) — Alex Garland * Men (2022) — Alex Garland * The Shining (1980) — Stanley Kubrick * Skinamarink (2022) — Kyle Edward Ball * Exit 8 — referenced as liminal space film * Lost Highway (1997) — David Lynch * Mulholland Drive (2001) — David Lynch * Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me / Twin Peaks (series) — David Lynch * Long Legs (2024) — Oz Perkins * The Monkey (2025) — Oz Perkins * Keeper — Oz Perkins * The Black Coat's Daughter / February (2015) — Oz Perkins * Hocum — referenced for comparison (sound design and scare level) * Presence (2025) — referenced for scare level comparison * Life of Chuck (2024) — referenced * Creep (2014) — Mark Duplass * 12 Years a Slave (2013) — referenced re: Chiwetel Ejiofor * Sentimental Value (2025) — referenced re: Renate Reinsve * Worst Person in the World (2021) — referenced re: Renate Reinsve * Fjord (2026) — referenced; won Palme d'Or at Cannes * Boys Go to Jupiter (2025) — referenced re: young filmmakers * Pearl (2022) / X / MaXXXine — Ti West trilogy, referenced re: A24 sequels * Talk to Me 2 — referenced re: A24 sequels * Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark (2019) — André Øvredal * The Autopsy of Jane Doe (2016) — André Øvredal * Voyage of the Demeter (2023) — André Øvredal
📬 Contact 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com 📘 Facebook: Mindframes Movies 🎧 Now Playing Network — nowplayingpodcast.net ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com
Mindframes Show Notes I Love Boosters (2026) — Episode 118 Directed by: Boots Riley Written by: Boots Riley Starring: Keke Palmer, Naomi Ackie, Taylour Paige, Poppy Liu, Eiza González, LaKeith Stanfield, Will Poulter, Don Cheadle, Demi Moore Cinematography: Natasha Braier Costume Design: Shirley Kurata Score: Tune-Yards Distributor: Neon IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt30827810/
Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave discuss I Love Boosters (2026) — the sophomore feature from writer-director Boots Riley (Sorry to Bother You). And they didn't just watch it: Boots Riley was at their screening, making this a particularly special episode.
The film follows the Velvet Gang, a crew of professional shoplifters — or "boosters" — led by Corvette (Keke Palmer), who steal high-end fashion and redistribute it to their community at affordable prices, calling it "fashion-forward philanthropy." Their target: Christie Smith (Demi Moore), a cutthroat fashion maven who has stolen Corvette's own designs and passed them off as her own.
Michael and Dave dig into Riley's political vision and whether the film preaches or persuades, Keke Palmer's career-best performance, the stunning visual craft from cinematographer Natasha Braier and costume designer Shirley Kurata, and the film's surrealist escalation into sci-fi territory. The spoiler section tackles the film's central question head-on: can style — and collective action — actually be a revolutionary act?
Michael gives the film 4 stars. Dave gives it 4.5 stars.
🧠 Thematic Discussion I Love Boosters is a Robin Hood story on the surface, but underneath it's a film about who gets to own beauty, creativity, and style — and who gets locked out.
The villain Christie Smith isn't just a rich corporate tyrant. She's a creative thief: she literally steals Corvette's designs and passes them off as her vision. And the fashion brand Metro operates on the logic of planned obsolescence — last season's color is this season's shame — a system the film directly compares to Apple.
The boosters respond not by rejecting fashion, but by redistributing it. They love clothes. Corvette loves making things. The film argues that the problem isn't beauty or style — it's that the mechanisms of capitalism have turned both into instruments of exclusion and control.
By the end, it's collective action — not individual heroism — that carries the day. The Velvet Gang, workers inside the company, and protesters in China all have to come together. The teleportation device, Michael argues, is less a narrative shortcut and more a statement of hope: you never know how things are going to accelerate, so don't stop believing the impossible is possible. Maybe the film itself is the teleporter.
Dave's read: the whimsy isn't just sugar coating the medicine. The wonder is the medicine. Corvette doesn't become cynical. She keeps making art in a broken world. And that refusal to give up is the film's most radical argument.
⏱️ Timestamps Time Segment 00:00:19 Intro & film overview — premise, genre, first impressions 00:00:55 Director discussion — Boots Riley's career, Sorry to Bother You, I'm a Virgo; Riley's politics 00:10:01 "This is a very, very funny, weird movie" — pivoting from politics to the experience 00:11:10 Cast discussion — Keke Palmer as Corvette; the film's female-centered story 00:12:33 Supporting cast — Naomi Ackie, Taylour Paige, Will Poulter, Don Cheadle, LaKeith Stanfield 00:14:26 Demi Moore — stunt casting or not? Christie Smith vs. The Substance 00:16:39 Cinematography — Natasha Braier, Zola, The Neon Demon, custom lenses, color palette 00:20:35 Production design — the tilting building, deliberate lo-fi effects, the chicken shack hideout 00:24:35 Costume design — Shirley Kurata (Everything Everywhere All at Once); fashion as political argument 00:29:36 ⭐ Spoiler-free reviews — Michael: 4 stars / Dave: 4.5 stars 00:41:49 ⚠️ SPOILER SECTION — comparison to One Battle After Another; Christie Smith vs. the "Trump surrogate" villain 00:44:38 Thematic deep dive — fashion as class warfare; planned obsolescence; Apple logic; Corvette's Robin Hood motive 00:46:40 Dave on physical media collecting — the empty fashion show of steel books and embossed slipcovers 00:53:05 The big reveal — Christie stole Corvette's design; creative extraction as the film's true villain 00:53:56 The teleportation machine — deus ex machina, or something else? China, collective struggle, worldwide solidarity 01:01:47 The ending — optimistic or bittersweet? Does Boots believe his own hope? 01:06:24 Closing thoughts & next episode tease ⭐ Ratings Michael: 4 / 5 stars Funny, visually original, Keke Palmer is extraordinary. The third-act plot device lands awkwardly but the politics work because they're felt rather than lectured. Possibly gains a half star on rewatch.
Dave: 4.5 / 5 stars A better film than Sorry to Bother You in key ways. The whimsy is the point, not just the wrapper. The most important kind of film for right now.
🎞️ Films & Directors Mentioned * Sorry to Bother You (2018) — Boots Riley * I'm a Virgo (2023 series) — Boots Riley * Zola (2020) — Janicza Bravo (also shot by Natasha Braier) * The Neon Demon (2016) — Nicolas Winding Refn (also shot by Natasha Braier) * Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022) — costumes by Shirley Kurata * The Substance (2024) — Coralie Fargeat (Demi Moore) * Nope (2022) — Jordan Peele (Keke Palmer) * One Battle After Another (2025) — compared/contrasted with Boosters on political filmmaking * The Mandalorian & Grogu (2026) — mentioned as next episode consideration * The Stranger (Camus adaptation) — mentioned as potential future episode * Obsession — mentioned as potential future episode * Caligula (1979) — brief tangent; Dave once interviewed Malcolm McDowell
📬 Contact 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com 📘 Facebook: Mindframes 🎧 Now Playing Network ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com
🎬 Mindframes Show Notes Hokum (2026) Directed by: Damian McCarthy Written by: Damian McCarthy Starring: Adam Scott IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt35628972/
Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave discuss Hokum (2026), a slow-burn Irish folk horror film from Damian McCarthy centered on a cynical horror writer who travels to a haunted inn to scatter his parents' ashes—only to uncover hidden violence, buried grief, and a terrifying supernatural presence lurking within the hotel.
The discussion explores the film's atmospheric craftsmanship, old-school suspense techniques, creature design, and overwhelming sense of dread. Along the way, the hosts compare Hokum to films like The Shining, Hereditary, The Witch, and Barbarian, while debating whether the film's emotional revelations are genuinely effective or too indebted to familiar Stephen King-style trauma storytelling.
🧠 Thematic Discussion Hokum explores the relationship between hidden spaces and hidden emotional wounds. The film presents grief as something buried, locked away, and left unresolved until it begins to poison both individuals and communities.
Through the haunted architecture of the inn and Om's suppressed guilt surrounding his parents, the film suggests that what we refuse to confront eventually manifests externally—whether psychologically, socially, or supernaturally.
⏱️ Timestamps Time Segment 00:00 Intro & setup 00:35 Film premise + synopsis 01:20 Damian McCarthy discussion 04:10 Adam Scott performance discussion 10:15 Atmosphere & cinematography 14:20 Use of space, darkness, and suspense 17:30 Sound design analysis 19:40 Creature design discussion 22:10 Stephen King influences 26:00 Michael's criticism of exposition 30:00 "Old-school suspense" discussion 34:10 Dave's review (★★★★☆) 39:00 Michael's review (★★★½☆) 41:30 ⚠️ Spoiler section begins 42:00 The witch interpretation debate 45:10 Om's grief and trauma reveal 49:20 The hidden room & Fiona mystery 53:00 The hotel as metaphorical space 56:15 Discussion of suicide & repression 01:00:40 Theme breakdown: hidden truths 01:05:00 Final interpretation debate 01:08:30 Closing thoughts 🎞️ Films & Directors Mentioned * The Shining * Hereditary * The Witch * Barbarian * Heretic * The Monkey * Men * Caveat * Oddity * Stephen King * Alfred Hitchcock * Ari Aster
📬 Contact 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com 📘 Facebook: Mindframes 🎧 Now Playing Network ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com
Mindframes Show Notes Normal (2026) Directed by: Ben Wheatley Written by: Derek Kolstad Starring: Bob Odenkirk, Lena Headey, Henry Winkler IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt31195136/
Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave break down Normal (2026), a genre-blending action thriller from Ben Wheatley starring Bob Odenkirk as a temporary small-town sheriff uncovering a hidden criminal system beneath a seemingly quiet Minnesota town.
The discussion explores the film's strengths—particularly its sharp, inventive action sequences—while wrestling with its weaker character development and underdeveloped thematic ambitions. Along the way, the hosts compare Normal to films like No Country for Old Men, Fargo, and Hot Fuzz, asking whether the film earns its ideas about morality, violence, and the illusion of "normality."
Thematic Discussion Normal presents the idea that "normality" is not peace or order, but a fragile illusion maintained by hidden systems of violence and compromise. The film suggests that communities—and individuals—often accept morally compromised structures in exchange for stability, even when those systems are corrupt. However, while the idea is compelling, the film struggles to fully develop or emotionally ground this thesis, leaving it more implied than earned.
⏱️ Timestamps Time Segment 00:00 Intro & setup 00:25 Film overview + premise 02:14 Ben Wheatley career discussion 05:39 Derek Kolstad influence & action style 08:05 Cast discussion (Odenkirk, Headey, Winkler) 11:20 Odenkirk as "underestimated man" archetype 13:30 Character depth debate (Michael vs Dave) 16:30 "Should this have been a miniseries?" 18:45 Action vs drama effectiveness 20:00 Michael's review (★★★☆☆) 24:30 Dave's review (★★★☆☆) 29:30 Comparisons: No Country, Fargo, Hot Fuzz 36:30 ⚠️ Spoiler section begins 36:40 Reveal: the town's Yakuza deal 38:30 Debate: Is the central mystery… boring? 40:25 Moral ambiguity discussion 46:30 Thematic breakdown: what is "normal"? 50:45 Civil War comparison (hidden violence) 54:00 Final interpretation debate 58:00 Closing thoughts 📬 Contact 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com 📘 Facebook: Mindframes 🎧 Now Playing Network ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com
The Drama (2026) Directed by: Christopher Borgli Starring: Zendaya, Robert Pattinson, Alana Haim, Mamadou Athie Episode: 115
🎬 Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave explore The Drama (2026), a psychologically charged romantic drama directed by Christopher Borgli. The film follows an engaged couple whose relationship is destabilized during a wedding tasting dinner when a seemingly harmless party game—confessing the worst thing you've ever done—reveals a deeply disturbing secret.
What begins as an offbeat romantic setup quickly spirals into a tense moral examination of identity, forgiveness, and whether people can truly escape their past. Anchored by powerful performances from Zendaya and Robert Pattinson, the film blends discomfort, dark humor, and emotional intensity into a uniquely unsettling experience.
🧠 Thematic Discussion (3-Sentence Core) Are we defined by our worst thoughts, or only by the actions we take? The film challenges the audience to confront whether intent—especially unacted intent—carries moral weight equal to real harm. Ultimately, The Drama refuses to answer this question directly, instead forcing viewers to sit in discomfort and decide for themselves.
⏱️ Timestamps Time Segment 00:00 Intro – Welcome to Mindframes 00:40 Film Overview & Director Context 02:00 Borgli's Style: Discomfort, Identity, Moral Unease 03:30 Plot Setup – Wedding Dinner & Confession Game 06:30 Theme Introduction – Worst Thoughts vs Actions 07:15 Cinematography & Set Design Discussion 09:00 Performances – Zendaya & Pattinson 12:00 Editing, Close-ups, and Framing 17:50 Dave's Review (4.5/5) 21:00 Michael's Review (4/5) 33:45 Spoiler Warning 34:30 Full Plot Breakdown 36:00 The Secret Revealed 40:00 Moral Debate Begins 47:00 Thought vs Action Ethics 52:00 Generational & Cultural Context 1:00:00 Character Analysis (Rachel, Charlie, Emma) 1:05:00 Subplots (DJ, coworker incident) 1:08:00 Ending Analysis (Diner Scene) 1:10:30 Final Debate: What Defines Us? 1:20:00 Closing Thoughts & Humor 📬 Contact & Links * 🌐 Website: https://mindframesfilm.com * 📘 Facebook: Mindframes Film * 🎧 Network: Now Playing Network * 📧 Email: info@mindframesfilm.com
Mindframes Show Notes: Sirat (2025) Film Credits Title: Sirat Director: Olivier Laxe Country: Spain / Morocco Starring: Non-professional cast Festival Run: Fantastic Fest, Cannes recognition (director) IMDb: (Add link once available)
Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave explore Sirat, a visually striking and spiritually immersive journey through the Moroccan desert. Following a father and son searching for a missing daughter, the film evolves from a grounded quest into something far more abstract and existential. The hosts unpack how the film uses rave culture, community, and physical endurance to explore themes of transcendence, identity, and surrender. What begins as a search becomes a stripping away—of purpose, of control, and ultimately of self.
Thematic Discussion Sirat presents life as an uncontrollable path that strips away identity through suffering, leaving individuals either isolated or transformed. Through the physical and communal ritual of rave culture, the film suggests transcendence is achieved not through control, but through surrender and shared experience. Ultimately, the film asks whether meaning is found in purposeful striving—or in accepting the dissolution of self into something greater.
⏱️ Timestamps Time Segment Notes 00:00:50 Intro Welcome + show premise 00:02:25 Film Intro Summary of Sirat and setup 00:04:00 Initial Reactions Positive impressions, Oscar discussion 00:04:24 Director Background Olivier Laxe and artistic intent 00:06:07 Cinematography Use of desert, light, and scale 00:14:20 Rave vs Desert Movement, rhythm, and thematic parallels 00:20:00 Community Emergence Formation of the traveling group 00:21:47 Spoiler-Free Reviews Michael and Dave's takes 00:25:36 Dave's Review Film as trance-like experience 00:29:46 Malick Comparison Scale of humanity (small vs monumental) 00:32:00 Community Discussion Marginalized groups and belonging 00:35:22 Theme Setup "Sirat" as path / bridge metaphor 00:40:07 Breakdown of Order Loss of structure and purpose 00:43:41 Suffering as Process Identity stripped through hardship 00:45:30 Meaning vs Meaninglessness Is the journey purposeful? 00:46:36 Rave as Spiritual Experience Faith, ritual, and embodiment 00:52:07 Religion & Physical Ritual Parallels to prayer and transcendence 00:55:59 Letting Go of Self Passive acceptance vs active control 01:02:17 Community vs Individual Tension between self and group 01:08:44 Final Sequence Setup Minefield and end of journey 01:10:12 Ending Analysis Death, surrender, transcendence 📬 Contact & Links 🌐 Website: https://mindframesfilm.com 📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mindframesfilm 🎧 Network: https://www.nowplayingnetwork.net 📧 Email: info@mindframesfilm.com
Mindframes Show Notes Episode 113: The Bride (2026) Film: The Bride (2026) Director: Maggie Gyllenhaal Starring: Jessie Buckley, Christian Bale, Annette Bening, Jake Gyllenhaal, Peter Sarsgaard, Penélope Cruz Genre: Gothic Noir / Horror Reimagining IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/
Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael Cockerill and Dave Canfield discuss Maggie Gyllenhaal's ambitious reimagining of the Frankenstein myth, The Bride. The film centers on the Bride of Frankenstein—here named Ida—who is resurrected in 1930s Chicago to serve as a companion for Frankenstein's monster. What follows is a strange and sprawling narrative mixing gangster drama, feminist allegory, gothic horror, and a Bonnie-and-Clyde style crime story.
Michael and Dave examine how the film reframes the traditionally underdeveloped Bride character as a rebellious protagonist searching for identity and autonomy. While praising Jessie Buckley and Christian Bale's performances and the film's striking visual imagination, they debate whether the movie's numerous plotlines and meta-elements—especially the presence of Mary Shelley as a guiding figure—ultimately dilute the story.
Despite mixed reactions to its narrative coherence, the hosts agree that the film is a bold attempt to expand the Frankenstein mythos and finally place the Bride at the center of her own story.
Thematic Discussion (3 Sentences) The central theme explored in this episode is reinvigoration and rebirth—not only the literal resurrection of Ida but also the emotional and existential renewal experienced by both the Bride and Frankenstein's monster. The film presents identity as something fluid and constructed, asking whether characters defined as "monsters" can reclaim agency and define themselves outside the intentions of their creators. Ultimately, Michael and Dave debate whether the film succeeds in transforming the Bride from an iconic symbol into a fully realized character.
Key Discussion Timestamps Time Topic 00:00 Intro – Welcome to Mindframes 00:01 Synopsis of The Bride and setup 00:02 Brief history of Frankenstein and the Bride character 00:03 The original Bride of Frankenstein (1935) and Elsa Lanchester 00:06 Why the Bride became an icon despite minimal screen time 00:07 Universal Monsters legacy and modern reboots 00:08 Other film appearances of the Bride character 00:11 Maggie Gyllenhaal's reinterpretation of the myth 00:13 Plot overview and major characters 00:19 Review discussion begins 00:20 Dave's review and rating 00:24 Michael's review and rating 00:31 Narrative structure and story problems 00:34 Is the film actually horror? Genre debate 00:38 Transition into thematic discussion 00:41 Theme: reinvigoration and resurrection 00:45 Frankenstein's loneliness and desire for a companion 00:52 The Bride's evolving identity 00:55 The Bonnie-and-Clyde element of the film 00:58 Monstrosity and moral agency 01:01 Did the film successfully reinvent the Frankenstein myth? Contact & Links Website: https://mindframesfilm.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mindframesfilm Now Playing Network: https://nowplayingnetwork.net Email: info@mindframesfilm.com
Mindframes Show Notes Nirvana the Band the Show the Movie (2026) Directed by: Matt Johnson Starring: Matt Johnson, Jay McCarrol Written by: Matt Johnson & Jay McCarrol Genre: Comedy / Time Travel / Meta Runtime: Approx. 100 minutes IMDb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt (insert final ID)
Episode Summary In this mini-episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave review Nirvana the Band the Show the Movie, the long-awaited feature adaptation of the cult Canadian web series. When Matt and Jay's plan to finally book a show at Toronto's Rivoli goes catastrophically wrong, they accidentally travel back to 2008 — launching a chaotic, meta, Back-to-the-Future-inflected adventure through friendship, ego, and DIY filmmaking.
Unlike our usual episodes, this discussion does not center on a formal thematic breakdown. Instead, we explore how Matt Johnson's latest film fits into his body of work (including BlackBerry, The Dirties, and Operation Avalanche), why this may be his most overtly comedic film, and how its sincerity sets it apart from darker contemporary comedies.
We also discuss:
- The film's guerrilla filmmaking style
- The surprising twist that left audiences gasping
- The heavy (and self-aware) homage to Back to the Future
- Why this movie feels like an "anti-despair" comedy
Both hosts ultimately give the film a strong recommendation.
Thematic Reflection (Mini Version) Though this is not a full thematic episode, a through-line naturally emerges in the discussion:
In a cultural moment saturated with irony and cynical humor, Nirvana the Band the Show the Movie chooses sincerity. Its characters are delusional and self-important, but they are also fundamentally kind — and that kindness becomes the emotional anchor of the film. The result is a comedy that feels both absurd and restorative.
Timestamps Time Segment 00:00 Welcome & mini-episode format explanation 01:00 Synopsis & background on the original web series 04:45 Matt Johnson's filmography: The Dirties, Operation Avalanche, BlackBerry 10:30 Comedy style comparison (British awkwardness, Tim Robinson contrast) 15:00 Practical effects & low-budget filmmaking discussion 18:45 Back to the Future homage analysis 23:00 Spoiler warning 23:30 Dave's review (4/5) 26:45 Michael's review (4/5) 31:00 The twist & audience reaction 33:00 "Anti-despair" cinema & sincerity in comedy 37:00 Outro & upcoming films (The Bride, Project Hail Mary) Contact & Follow 🌐 Website: https://mindframesfilm.com 📘 Facebook: Mindframes Podcast 🎙️ Proud member of the Now Playing Network 📧 Email: info@mindframesfilm.com
If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show — it helps other film lovers find us.
🎬 Mindframes Show Notes Episode 111 — Good Luck, Have Fun, Don't Die Film Credits Film: Good Luck, Have Fun, Don't Die Director: Gore Verbinski Writer: Matthew Robinson Starring: Sam Rockwell, Juno Temple, Michael Peña, Zazie Beetz, Haley Lu Richardson Genre: Sci-Fi / Time-Loop Thriller / Dark Comedy Release Year: 2025
IMDb: (Insert official link when available)
Episode Summary Michael and Dave explore Gore Verbinski's genre-blending sci-fi film Good Luck, Have Fun, Don't Die, a time-loop story about a soldier attempting to stop a rogue artificial intelligence across repeated attempts. What begins as a chaotic, humorous sci-fi premise unfolds into a deeper philosophical discussion about repetition, control, and emotional detachment.
Is the film a messy but ambitious meditation on gamified existence, or does its spectacle drown its humanity? The hosts debate whether infinite retries lead to growth — or erode meaning altogether.
Thematic Discussion (Three-Sentence Core) The episode examines whether repetition creates growth or emotional numbness. Unlike Groundhog Day, where the protagonist is trapped until he becomes empathetic, this film presents a character who can reset at will — raising the question of whether control over repetition removes the stakes of human experience. Ultimately, the discussion centers on whether hope lies in continuing the loop — or in learning to step outside it.
Episode Breakdown & Timestamps Time Segment 00:00 Intro — Welcome to Mindframes and film setup 00:40 Synopsis and premise discussion 02:40 Gore Verbinski's career and stylistic traits 06:15 Verbinski themes — characters trapped in systems 09:30 Writer Matthew Robinson and situational storytelling 12:45 Sam Rockwell as the emotional anchor of the film 15:45 Supporting cast: Juno Temple, Michael Peña, Zazie Beetz 17:40 Visual style, cinematography, and production design 19:45 Dave's review — spectacle, fun, and cinematic experience 22:10 Michael's review — messiness, tonal imbalance, and structure 27:00 Debate: Is the film visually spectacular? 33:00 Entering the Spoiler Section 34:00 Gamification and repetition as thematic core 36:00 Comparison to Groundhog Day — control vs entrapment 40:00 Hope, imperfection, and persistence (Dave's perspective) 43:30 Emotional detachment and numbness (Michael's perspective) 47:00 Does Sam Rockwell's character actually grow? 52:00 Homage, pastiche, and borrowing from genre films 56:00 Cult status, box office, and AI films in context 59:30 AI as character vs plot device — comparison to HAL End Closing reflections Final Ratings Dave: ★★★★☆ (4/5) A messy but engaging film where persistence, relationships, and the journey matter more than perfection.
Michael: ★★★☆☆ (3/5) Ambitious and thought-provoking, but structurally uneven and emotionally diluted by spectacle.
Contact & Follow 🌐 Website: https://mindframesfilm.com 📘 Facebook: https://facebook.com/mindframesfilm 🎙 Now Playing Network: https://nowplayingnetwork.net 📧 Email: info@mindframesfilm.com
Episode 110 — Send Help
Film Credits Title: Send Help Director: Sam Raimi Starring: Rachel McAdams, Dylan O'Brien, Dennis Haysbert, Chris Pang Genre: Survival Thriller / Dark Comedy / Psychological Horror
Episode Summary In this episode, Michael and David examine Sam Raimi's Send Help, a survival thriller about two corporate survivors stranded on a deserted island after a plane crash. What begins as a struggle for survival turns into a psychological battle for power, identity, and control. The discussion focuses heavily on Linda's transformation — whether the island reveals her true nature or corrupts her — and what the film suggests about power, resentment, and human nature.
Three-Sentence Thematic Core Send Help explores what happens when social hierarchies collapse and survival becomes the only currency. The film questions whether power corrupts or merely reveals what was already present within a person. Linda's journey suggests a darker possibility: that the oppressed may replicate the very systems that once diminished them.
Main Discussion Topic 1 — Linda's Transformation * Starts as overlooked, competent, underappreciated worker * Gains survival power → shifts into control and manipulation * Film asks: Was this always Linda, or did the island create her?
Topic 2 — Power and Reversal * Corporate hierarchy collapses on the island * Linda becomes capable / Bradley becomes helpless * Echoes Triangle of Sadness: oppressed gaining power
Topic 3 — Cynicism vs Revelation * Linda mirrors the cruelty she once suffered * The film may betray the "underdog triumph" trope * Ending suggests survival ≠ moral growth
Topic 4 — Raimi Style and Tone * Mix of dark humor, physical horror, and thriller tension * Use of Raimi-cam and kinetic physicality * Balance between comedy, brutality, and psychological tension
Topic 5 — Thin Plot, Strong Character Core * Narrative is minimal: two people, one island, shifting dominance * Rachel McAdams' performance carries emotional and thematic weight * Film remains engaging through physical tension and character conflict
Episode Ratings David: 4 / 5 Michael: 3 / 5
Strengths:
- Performance (McAdams)
- Physical humor and tension
- Raimi stylistic energy
Weaknesses:
- Thin premise
- Murky ending
- Uneven CGI realism
Closing / Contact Mindframes Film Podcast mindframesfilm.com Now Playing Network Facebook info@mindframesfilm.com
28 Years Later: The Bone Temple (2026)
Episode Summary: In this episode, Michael and Dave dissect 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, the most visually ambitious and thematically rich installment in the iconic 28 Days Later franchise. They explore the film's eerie cult narrative, psychological undercurrents, and the shifting horror dynamics that turn humans into the real monsters. With Nia DaCosta in the director's chair and Alex Garland returning as writer, the film blends horror, satire, and surprising moments of hope. A rich conversation for fans of speculative horror and social allegory.
🎬 Cast & Crew Details – Who Made This Film and Why It Matters * Director: Nia DaCosta (Candyman, The Marvels, Little Woods) * Writer: Alex Garland (Ex Machina, Annihilation, Men, 28 Days Later) * Cinematographer: Sean Bobbitt (12 Years a Slave, Widows, Hunger) * Key Cast:
+ Ralph Fiennes as Dr. Ian Kelson – a monument builder and reluctant scientist
+ Alfie Williams as Spike – a returning survivor struggling with identity
+ Jack O'Connell as Jimmy Crystal – the chilling, charismatic cult leader
+ Chai Lewis-Perry as Samson – a towering infected in the midst of transformation
⏱️ Timestamps & Topics – Your Guide Through the Conversation Time Topic 00:00 Opening Banter & Setting the Stage for Bone Temple 00:41 Introducing the Film – Context Within the Franchise 01:19 Directorial Approach: Nia DaCosta's Vision & Filmography 02:24 Comparing to 2025's 28 Years Later – Evolution or Echo? 04:18 Characters Returning & The Cult of the Jimmies Introduced 07:34 Revisiting the Franchise's Viral Origins & Setting 10:01 Plot Overview: Bone Temples, Cults, and Scientific Obsession 10:44 Cinematography Upgrades & Visual Tone Shifts 13:26 Danny Boyle's Influence & Where DaCosta Departs 15:38 Narrative Tightness vs. Thematic Breadth 16:23 Box Office Woes & The "January Dump" Conspiracy 17:35 Jimmy Crystal as a Breakout Villain 18:18 Spoiler-Free Reviews: Performances, Style, and Reception 21:46 Ralph Fiennes' Complex Turn as Dr. Kelson 23:32 Missteps in Marketing & Missed Opportunities 26:20 Themes vs. Advertising: What the Film Really Offers 27:26 Final Thoughts and Personal Ratings ⚠️ Spoiler Discussion Highlights – Deeper Themes, Arcs, and Revelations * The Jimmies as Symbol & Horror: The gang discusses how the Jimmies reflect societal decay, inspired by the real-life figure of Jimmy Savile. Their cultish behavior and unflinching cruelty mirror deeper fears about manipulation, lost innocence, and the rot at the core of community leadership. * Samson's Redemption Arc: A standout element of the film, Samson's transformation from infected monster to near-human symbolizes the potential for recovery even in corrupted bodies and minds. His scenes with Dr. Kelson evoke tenderness, contrast with the Jimmies' savagery, and challenge the notion of what makes someone "monstrous." * Human Evil vs. Infected Violence: The conversation explores how the infected, though dangerous, follow instinct—while the Jimmies choose cruelty. This blurs the line between traditional "monster" narratives and moral horror, echoing themes from Lord of the Flies and The Road. * Visual Juxtaposition of Horror and Beauty: Bone temples, lush landscapes, and surreal moments (like cloud-gazing while high) create a strange harmony. These sequences ask whether beauty can exist in a world of collapse and whether healing is possible amid trauma. * Cultural Legacy & Genre Evolution: Dave and Michael reflect on how the 28 franchise redefined the zombie genre, and how Bone Temple may mark a new phase—one that values emotional depth and psychological horror as much as jump scares.
Mentioned in this Episode:
- Films: Candyman (2021), Widows, Red Dragon, Gangs of London, Deluge (1933)
- Cultural Figures: Jimmy Savile, Mr. Rogers
- Literary/Genre References: Lord of the Flies, The Walking Dead, Mad Max, Godzilla
Connect with Us: Website: https://mindframesfilm.com
Show Notes Film / Topic * Title: Looking to 2026: The Future of Cinema * Focus: Industry trends, cultural anxieties, and the most anticipated films of 2026 * IMDb: N/A (discussion episode)
Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and David look ahead to 2026 and ask a deceptively simple question: what kind of year will it be for movies? Coming off what they consider a creatively rich—but commercially uneven—2025, the conversation explores the tension between artistic vitality and economic uncertainty. From box office struggles and bloated marketing budgets to shifting audience habits and global cinema's rising influence, the hosts balance cautious concern with genuine excitement for what's coming next.
Themes & Discussion Theme 1 – Cinema Thriving Creatively, Struggling Economically While 2025 delivered exceptional films and performances, many acclaimed movies failed to connect with large audiences. The episode interrogates whether this gap reflects streaming habits, rising costs, marketing excess, or deeper cultural fatigue with the theatrical model.
Theme 2 – Event Movies vs. Personal Cinema The hosts contrast massive IP-driven releases (Avengers: Doomsday, Dune: Part Three, Toy Story 5) with filmmaker-driven projects from auteurs like Nolan, Villeneuve, Gerwig, Eggers, Spielberg, and Iñárritu—questioning whether spectacle alone can sustain moviegoing culture.
Theme 3 – Hope Through Global & Generational Shifts Despite storm clouds, there are signs of renewal: Gen Z showing renewed interest in theaters, international films breaking through, and genre cinema thriving on modest budgets. The episode argues that cinema isn't dying—it's recalibrating.
Timestamps Time Topic 00:00 Intro & framing the question of 2026 05:30 Why 2025 was a great creative year 12:00 Box office disappointments & marketing excess 22:00 Streaming, audience fatigue, and cultural shifts 34:00 Big tentpoles vs. auteur-driven films 47:00 Superhero fatigue & the future of franchises 58:00 Dune, Nolan, Spielberg, and prestige cinema 01:12:00 Horror, genre films, and low-budget success stories 01:25:00 Why there's still reason to be hopeful 01:32:00 Final thoughts on where cinema is heading Hosts * Michael Cockerill * David Canfield
Contact & Links * 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com * 📘 Facebook: Mindframes Film * 🎧 Now Playing Network * ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com
Mindframes — Best of 2025 Episode Title Best Films of 2025 — Trends, Themes, and the State of Cinema
Film Information This is a multi‑film recap episode.
Primary Shared Films Discussed:
- Weapons
- Eddington
- Hamnet
- Sinners
- One Battle After Another
- Train Dreams
- Universal Language
- Frankenstein
Additional Films Referenced:
- It Was Just an Accident
- Ebony and Ivory
- Sirât
- The Zone of Interest
- Everything Everywhere All at Once
- Avatar: Fire and Ash
Episode Summary In this year‑end episode of Mindframes, Michael Cockerill and David Canfield look back on what they agree was one of the strongest years in cinema in recent memory. Rather than ranking films strictly by quality, the discussion centers on how 2025's movies reflected the emotional, cultural, and political realities of the moment. The hosts explore major technical trends—such as the return of controlled formalism, the renewed importance of sound design, and a more disciplined use of CGI—before turning to deeper thematic currents running through the year's films. Across genres, 2025 cinema repeatedly grappled with loss, systemic failure, alienation, and the fragile possibility of hope. The episode concludes with personal picks, shared favorites, and a defense of films that dared to resist cynicism through human connection and formal craft.
Themes & Discussion Controlled Formalism Returns Many of the standout films of 2025 rejected frenetic camera work in favor of classical composition—locked‑off shots, wide frames, symmetry, and negative space. This stylistic restraint allowed emotion to emerge gradually rather than being chased by the camera. Films like Hamnet exemplified how formal discipline can deepen emotional resonance and restore cinematic patience.
Sound, Silence, and the Off‑Screen World Sound design emerged as a dominant expressive tool, often prioritizing diegetic and off‑screen audio over traditional sweeping scores. Silence itself became a source of tension, especially in horror, where absence of sound replaced musical cues. This trend reflects both creative evolution and the challenge of balancing theatrical sound design with home viewing habits.
Loss, Systems, and the Crisis of Hope Across genres, filmmakers returned obsessively to stories of missing or dead children, institutional collapse, and moral ambiguity. These narratives frame despair as a defining emotional condition of the era, while asking whether hope can survive systemic pressure. Some films embraced the darkness; others, like Universal Language, quietly resisted it through small acts of human connection.
⏱ Timestamp Breakdown Time Topic 00:00 Episode introduction & format 02:00 Why 2025 was a great year for film 03:00 Controlled formalism & visual trends 07:00 Superhero films & genre reinvention 10:00 Sound design, silence, and scoring 18:00 CGI vs practical effects 21:00 Lighting: flat vs dynamic 25:00 Thematic trends: children, systems, despair 32:00 Criteria for personal picks 35:00 Dave's picks: Train Dreams & Ebony and Ivory 42:00 Michael's picks: It Was Just an Accident & Universal Language 50:00 Shared Top Films discussion 1:18:00 Final reflections on cinema & culture Hosts * Michael Cockerill * David Canfield
Links & Contact * 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com * 📘 Facebook * 🎧 Now Playing Network * ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com
Mindframes is a sometimes half‑assed but always wholehearted conversation about film, culture, and the moments that shape us.
🎧 Episode Title: Hamnet and the Ghosts We Inherit 🎮 Film Discussed: Hamnet (2025) 🗓️ Release Date: December 13, 2025 🎧 Hosts: Michael & David
⏱️ Timestamps & Highlights: * 00:00 – Intro Michael and David introduce the show and kick off discussion of Hamnet, Chloe Zhao's adaptation of Maggie O'Farrell's novel. * 00:48 – Film Overview Chloe Zhao's recent directorial triumph, premiere at TIFF, her filmography from Nomadland to Eternals, and Hamnet's awards buzz. * 02:23 – Plot & Themes The story centers on Agnes Hathaway and her marriage to Shakespeare, their shared grief over their son Hamnet's death, and how personal loss influenced artistic creation. * 04:11 – Cinematography by Lukasz Zal Discussion of Zal's previous work (The Zone of Interest, Loving Vincent), his visual storytelling, use of natural light, and the film's stunning forest imagery. * 06:15 – Book Origins and Historical Context Exploration of Maggie O'Farrell's novel, historical liberties, Shakespeare's personal life, and their dramatized relationship. * 10:00 – Jesse Buckley as Agnes Performance praise and her emotional depth, evolution from earlier roles (I'm Thinking of Ending Things, The Lost Daughter). * 17:00 – Paul Mescal as Shakespeare A restrained but complex portrayal. Debate over his reception compared to Buckley's, and reflections on artistic introspection. * 23:00 – Visual Language & Direction Comparison to Zone of Interest, Chloe Zhao's style (landscapes, close-ups), forest symbolism, and interiority of grief. * 30:00 – Pacing & Emotional Resonance Defense of the film's slow pace, importance of patient visuals, and building emotional payoff. * 35:00 – Art vs Family Sacrifice Broader film trends about artistic sacrifice, complexity of Shakespeare as a father, and cultural reflections. * 45:00 – Critical Response & Awards Speculation David and Michael reflect on Oscars potential, critical responses, and "devastating" as a recurring descriptor. * 47:00 – Third Act & Theatrical Closure A spoiler-free nod to the finale's emotional crescendo, visual poetry, and synthesis of nature and performance. * 50:00 – Final Reviews Michael gives it 5 stars, calls it a career-best for Buckley; David praises its emotional impact and timeless resonance.
🧠 Final Takeaways: * Theme(s): Grief, art as legacy, sacrifice, nature vs language, emotional communication, family and connection. * Mindframe(s) Rating: 5/5 haunted honeybees 🐝 * Listener Question: How do you process grief—through nature, through storytelling, or something else entirely?
Bugonia Directed by: Yorgos Lanthimos Written by: Will Tracy and Jang Joon-hwan
Starring: Emma Stone, Jesse Plemons, Aiden Delvis, Alicia Silverstone, Stavros Halkias Cinematography: Not specified (shot on VistaVision, 35mm, Willcam equipment) Release: 2025 IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12300742/
🎧 Episode Summary In this episode, Dave and Michael dive deep into Bugonia, the latest satirical and enigmatic offering from Yorgos Lanthimos. With a plot centering on two conspiracy-minded men who kidnap a powerful CEO they believe to be an alien, the hosts explore Lanthimos' signature blend of absurdism, social critique, and tonal precision. The conversation touches on thematic elements like power hierarchies, detachment from humanity, and the inescapable dynamics of empathy. Throughout, Dave and Michael reflect on Lanthimos' evolving filmography, his standout collaborations with Emma Stone, and the fascinating psychological and visual language of the film.
🧠 Thematic Discussion Bugonia offers a searing satire of corporate detachment, power inversion, and societal alienation. The film explores how humanity is distorted by institutional power, media messaging, and emotional denial. Through its bizarre plot and aesthetic choices, it challenges viewers to empathize with morally gray characters and question the systems that produce them.
⏱️ Major Segments & Timestamps Time Segment Description 00:00 Introduction Dave and Michael introduce the episode and set the tone with a brief synopsis of Bugonia. 01:00 Yorgos Lanthimos' Filmography Discussion of Lanthimos' previous works like The Favourite, Poor Things, The Lobster, and how Bugonia fits into his oeuvre. 03:00 Themes of Power & Hierarchy Analysis of power dynamics and hierarchical inversions common in Lanthimos' films. 06:00 Empathy and Detachment Examination of how the film toys with emotional distance and the audience's capacity to empathize. 10:00 Emma Stone's Performance A focus on Stone's physicality, transformation, and recurring collaborations with Lanthimos. 13:00 Supporting Cast Breakdown of performances by Jesse Plemons, Alicia Silverstone, Stavros Halkias, and Aiden Delvis. 20:00 Visual Style & Cinematography Conversation about the film's use of camera angles, lens choice, lighting, and aspect ratio to reflect power and control. 25:00 Corporate Satire & Alien Allegory The hosts unpack the film's critique of corporate culture and dehumanization. 33:00 Spoiler Territory A deeper dive into specific scenes, character arcs, and philosophical implications, including a heated debate on "inhumanity" and moral ambiguity. 🌐 Contact & Links * Website: mindframesfilm.com * Facebook: facebook.com/mindframesmovies * Network: Now Playing Network * Email: info@mindframesfilm.com
Mindframes Podcast: Frankenstein (2025) Directed by: Guillermo del Toro Written by: Guillermo del Toro, based on the novel by Mary Shelley Starring: Oscar Isaac (Victor Frankenstein), Jacob Elordi (The Creature), Christoph Waltz (Von Klemper), Mia Goth (Elizabeth/Claire Frankenstein), Charles Dance, Ralph Ineson, and David Bradley Cinematography: Dan Laustsen Release: 2025 (Netflix) IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1312221/
🎧 Episode Summary Dave and Michael explore Guillermo del Toro's long-awaited adaptation of Frankenstein — a film that blends gothic horror, Catholic melodrama, and emotional fantasy. They discuss del Toro's lifelong fascination with monsters, the film's lavish design, and how it rehumanizes one of literature's most tragic creations. The conversation dives into themes of creation, responsibility, and the eternal bond between monster and maker, while connecting the film to the long cinematic history of Frankenstein.
🧠 Thematic Discussion The hosts highlight del Toro's Frankenstein as both a love letter to monster cinema and a meditation on faith, class, and parenthood filtered through a Latin American Catholic lens. They note how del Toro's signature gothic romanticism tempers horror with empathy, positioning the creature as both victim and philosopher. Ultimately, they frame the film as a study of what it means to create—and to be responsible for what we bring into the world.
⏱️ Major Segments & Timestamps Time Segment Description 00:00 Introduction Dave and Michael introduce Frankenstein (2025) and Guillermo del Toro's career-long passion for the story. 02:00 Del Toro's Vision Discussion of del Toro's love for classic monster films, "monster kids" culture, and gothic influence. 06:30 Cinematography & Design Michael details Dan Laustsen's visual approach, lighting style, and practical effects. 10:00 Cast Overview Breakdown of performances: Oscar Isaac's intense Victor, Jacob Elordi's soulful creature, Christoph Waltz's enigmatic benefactor, and Mia Goth's dual role. 12:30 Visual & Thematic Tone The hosts debate whether the movie's look favors Netflix's small screen or theatrical presentation. 15:00 Spoiler-Free Reviews Both hosts offer initial impressions and star ratings (Michael: ★★★, Dave: ★★★★½). 21:40 Frankenstein Through History A deep dive into past adaptations—from the silent era to Hammer Horror, to Branagh's 1994 version—and how portrayals of the monster evolved. 30:00 The Mad Scientist Trope Comparing Victor Frankenstein to mad scientists through film history, including Cushing, Clive, and Branagh. 36:00 Modern Takes & Decline They explore recent attempts to revive the story (Victor Frankenstein, I, Frankenstein) and why few have matched its cultural power. 39:00 Del Toro's Achievement Did he deliver the definitive Frankenstein? Dave says yes—an affectionate, gothic triumph for lifelong fans. 40:30 Outro & Next Episode Tease for the next episode on Bugonia, the follow-up collaboration from Poor Things director Yorgos Lanthimos. 🌐 Contact & Links * Website: mindframesfilm.com * Facebook: facebook.com/mindframesmovies * Network: Now Playing Network * Email: Reach the team via their assistant "Abby Normal" at info@mindframesfilm.com
Episode 103: Anemone 🎬 Principal Cast & Crew * Director: Ronan Day-Lewis (feature debut) * Writers: Ronan Day-Lewis & Daniel Day-Lewis * Cinematography: Ben Fordsman * Main Cast:
+ Daniel Day-Lewis as Ray
+ Sean Bean as Jem
+ Samantha Morton as Nessa Stoker
+ Samuel Bottomley as Brian Stoker
+ Safiya Oakley-Green as Hattie
🕰️ Episode Breakdown 00:00 – Intro & Overview Michael and Dave introduce Anemone, a moody psychological drama and feature debut by Ronan Day-Lewis, starring his father Daniel Day-Lewis. They tease the film's atmospheric visuals, layered performances, and thematic heft.
01:25 – Plot Summary Dave summarizes the plot: Ray (Daniel Day-Lewis), a haunted recluse in rural England, is visited by his brother Jem (Sean Bean), prompting a confrontation with past traumas, estrangement, and the question of familial reconciliation.
02:50 – Visual Aesthetic & Cinematography The hosts explore the film's striking use of natural light, magical realism, and "damp, green" Northern England landscapes, captured by cinematographer Ben Fordsman. The weather acts as a near-character in the story.
05:50 – Symbolism & Style Michael critiques some symbolic elements and magical realism as heavy-handed. Dave defends their emotional resonance. Both agree the film shows great directorial promise despite moments of overreach.
08:52 – Cast Discussion
- Daniel Day-Lewis: Praised for his intensity, though some monologues feel forced due to script limitations. Potential Oscar buzz.
- Sean Bean: Commended for nuance and believability in a rare emotionally rich role.
- Samantha Morton: Strong but underwritten role as the estranged wife.
- Supporting Cast: Critique of thinly developed side characters, including son Brian and friend Hattie—sparking a broader conversation on representation in modern cinema.
31:00 – Reviews
- Dave: ★★★☆☆ – "Solid film with strong performances; a bit drawn out but emotionally effective."
- Michael: ★★★½☆ – "Visually compelling with a stacked cast. First-time director missteps but shows real talent."
39:00 – Thematic Deep Dive: Masculine Emotional Suppression The second half focuses on the film's central theme: male emotional repression—especially within British working-class culture. Ray's emotional barricades, military trauma, and the generational consequences are dissected.
46:00 – Symbolism of the Anemone Flower Michael interprets the title's metaphor: a subtle inheritance from the father, symbolizing buried emotion and unprocessed trauma blooming in isolation.
52:00 – Comparative Film Talk Mentions of The Lighthouse, Tree of Life, Phantom Thread, and The Witch as points of stylistic and thematic comparison.
59:00 – Closing Banter Discussion of upcoming episodes (likely Frankenstein by Guillermo del Toro), humorous talk of "OnlyVans" and critic calendars, and shoutouts to listeners and fellow reviewers.
Cast & Crew Director: Paul Thomas Anderson Cinematographer: Michael Bauman Composer: Jonny Greenwood
Cast:
- Leonardo DiCaprio as Bob Ferguson
- Chase Infinity as Willa Ferguson
- Sean Penn as Colonel Lockjaw
- Benicio Del Toro as Sensei Luis
- Regina Hall as Mother Helena
Episode 102: One Battle After Another Film Discussed: One Battle After Another (Dir. Paul Thomas Anderson) Hosts: Michael Cockerill & Dave Canfield Runtime: ~3 hours Theme: Resistance, legacy, generational change
⏱ Timestamps & Major Segments: 00:00–02:30 – 🎙 Intro & Film Overview Michael and Dave introduce PTA’s latest film, outlining the premise, setting, and stylistic tone.
02:30–10:15 – 🎥 Visual Style & Cinematography A deep dive into Michael Bauman’s kinetic visuals, PTA’s aesthetic trademarks, and how imperfections amplify tension.
10:15–17:00 – 🎶 Sound & Musical Trends Discussion on loud, eclectic music as a storytelling device and how this film navigates current audio mixing trends.
17:00–25:00 – 🌟 Cast & Performances Praise for Leonardo DiCaprio, Sean Penn, Chase Infinity, and Benicio del Toro. Emphasis on character depth and casting synergy.
26:00–33:00 – ⭐ Reviews & Final Verdicts Both hosts award 5 stars, highlighting rhythm, emotional weight, and thematic power.
33:00–56:00 – 🧠 Themes: Resistance & Generational Struggle (Spoilers) Exploration of resistance as a timeless cycle, the burden of political fatigue, and the promise of youth-led change.
56:00–End – 🧵 Closing Reflections Analogies to classic films (E.T., Pan’s Labyrinth), personal insights on activism, and why this is a capital “I” important film.
Would you like this exported as a PDF or formatted for your website backend?
Fifty boys start walking, three warnings get you shot, and somehow we are the ones out of breath. In this week’s Mindframes, Michael and Dave march into The Long Walk—where Cooper Hoffman broods, David Jonsson keeps the heart beating, and Mark Hamill cosplays as your least favorite PE teacher. Along the way we debate whether dystopias should come with better snacks, why America’s obsessed with televised misery, and if ★★★/5 means we survived… or just need new shoes.
Basic Facts
Role Name Director Francis Lawrence (Wikipedia) Screenwriter JT Mollner (Wikipedia) Producers Francis Lawrence; Roy Lee; Steven Schneider; Cameron MacConomy (Wikipedia) Cinematographer Jo Willems (Wikipedia) Editor Mark Yoshikawa (Wikipedia) Music / Score Jeremiah Fraites (Wikipedia) Production Companies Vertigo Entertainment; about:blank (Wikipedia) Distributor Lionsgate (Wikipedia) Chapters — Episode 101: The Long Walk * 00:00:14 — Cold open & show intro * 00:01:49 — Plot setup: rules of the Walk; Garraty & McVries * 00:04:01 — “Keep the focus on cast”: stripped-down craft, performances lead * 00:08:55 — Why Hoffman & Jonsson elevate “a tough adaptation” * 00:12:22 — Michael’s review: the Walk as real antagonist; issues with the Major * 00:21:01 — Michael’s rating: ★★★/5 * 00:21:12 — Dave’s review: resonance with present-day pessimism; skeletal dystopia * 00:28:14 — Casting types, shifting identities on the road * 00:30:40 — Mark Hamill thoughts vs. Life of Chuck praise * 00:32:30 — Theme segment: “the spectacle of violence” in America * 00:44:14 — Vietnam-era media, body-count reporting, long-walk parallels * 00:48:08 — Phones, 24/7 news, desensitization * 00:53:23 — Dignity stripped on camera; do we still see people? * 01:01:13 — Film vs. book crowds; keeping focus on the walkers * 01:03:53 — Wrap on causes vs. enablers of violence; no easy answers
The Roses is a 2025 satirical dark comedy–drama directed by Jay Roach (Austin Powers, Meet the Parents, Bombshell) and written by Tony McNamara (The Favourite, The Great). It is a modern reimagining of The War of the Roses, based on Warren Adler’s 1981 novel and the 1989 film adaptation.
✨ Cast * Olivia Colman as Ivy Rose — a restaurateur whose career blossoms. * Benedict Cumberbatch as Theo Rose — an architect whose career falters. * Supporting cast: Andy Samberg, Kate McKinnon, Allison Janney, Sunita Mani, Ncuti Gatwa, Jamie Demetriou, and Zoë Chao.
🕒 Timestamps * 00:32 — Intro & Guest Michael welcomes back contributor Tarek Fayoumi (Movies with Tarek, Positively Naperville, Movie Archer). * 00:59 — Film Background Setting the stage: how The Roses reimagines The War of the Roses and where it sits in Jay Roach’s career. * 02:47 — Themes Discussion of marriage, ambition, toxic competitiveness, and the cultural obsession with success. * 05:12 — Performances Olivia Colman and Benedict Cumberbatch praised for layered portrayals; how their acting makes satire both biting and human. * 09:45 — Ending Without spoilers, the group highlights the fiery, symbolic finale and how it compares to the 1989 version. * 24:17 — Verdicts & Ratings * 45:25 — Cinematography & Craft Talk of Florian Hoffmeister’s naturalistic cinematography, the symbolic house design, and connections to films like This Is 40 and Parasite.
🎧 Episode 99: Weapons – Horror, Mystery, and Institutions in Crisis In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave welcome special guest Tim Peebles—theologian, pastor, martial artist, and long-time film aficionado—for a deep dive into Zach Cregger’s new film Weapons.
Cregger, known for Barbarian (2022), returns with a multi-layered, genre-bending thriller where a small town unravels after its children mysteriously disappear into the night. With a Rashomon-style narrative, striking cinematography from Larkin Seiple (Everything Everywhere All at Once), and a cast led by Josh Brolin, Julia Garner, and Benedict Wong, Weapons pushes the boundaries of modern horror.
🔑 Topics We Discuss * The intense bidding war for the film—why even Jordan Peele wanted it * How the script stayed almost entirely intact from page to screen * A Rashomon-inspired structure and its effect on pacing and suspense * Cinematic homages: from Magnolia to The Shining to Italian giallo classics * Performances: Brolin’s rugged father figure, Garner’s demanding lead role, and Wong’s unexpected turn as a school principal * Themes of institutional failure (schools, police, community) and whether the film offers political commentary * The balance of horror, comedy, and surreal mystery that keeps audiences hooked
🎬 Why It Matters Weapons is more than just another horror release—it’s a cultural reflection on distrust of institutions, layered with dread, dark humor, and unforgettable imagery. Our conversation unpacks how Cregger masterfully controls tone, from the eerie to the playful, while still delivering an unnerving ride.
⭐ Ratings * Dave: 4–4.5 stars – “A thrill ride you’ll want to rewatch.” * Michael: 3.5–4 stars – “Ambitious, mixed-genre storytelling with a few tonal bumps.” * Tim: Highly recommends – “Dreadful and beautiful, horrifying and humorous—Cregger’s step up from Barbarian.”
Film Overview * Title: Eddington (2025) by Ari Aster * Setting: Small-town New Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic * Premise: Tension and division between a local sheriff (Joaquin Phoenix) and the town's mayor (Pedro Pascal), reflecting broader cultural and social fractures in America. * Themes: Polarization, the influence of social media, performative activism, the corporatization of crisis, and the psychological weight of 2020.
Cast & Performances * Joaquin Phoenix (Sheriff Joe Cross): Widely praised for his layered, committed performance. Considered perfect for the role. * Pedro Pascal (Mayor Ted Garcia): Serves as a foil to Phoenix’s sheriff. Also well-cast, though not a co-lead. * Emma Stone: Mixed feelings about her casting due to age and tone. Some discussion of alternative casting. * Austin Butler: Divisive but ultimately defended. His character is seen as representative of evangelical or conspiracy-driven youth. * A recurring homeless man character is discussed as a possible metaphor for society’s ignored truths or the prophetic outsider.
Cinematography & Technical Merits * Director of Photography: Darius Khondji (corrected after initially being misattributed to Bruno Delbonnel) * Visuals praised as among the best of the year—shot in New Mexico using real locations, lighting used to evoke horror pacing and psychological tension. * Stylistic comparisons to Hereditary and Seven. * Return of Ari Aster's visual motifs: isolation, daylight-to-night transitions, and symbolic elevation (e.g., houses on hills).
Genre & Stylistic Notes * Described as:
+ “Not quite a horror film, but horror-influenced”
+ A blend of satire, tragedy, psychological thriller, dark comedy, and drama
-
Compared to:
- No Country for Old Men (tone and landscape)
- Robert Altman’s Nashville (ensemble structure and social chaos)
- King of Comedy and Taxi Driver (Scorsese comparisons in the spoiler section)
- Rejection of Coen Brothers comparisons as too simplistic
Thematic Analysis (Spoiler Section) * Fragmentation of Reality: The main theme is how social media algorithms and performative digital culture drive people apart. * Bothsides-ism: The film avoids heroes or villains; it's more about the system manipulating everyone. * Performative Activism: Especially embodied in the youth protest scenes—young people react to national injustices despite their local irrelevance. * Corporate Exploitation: A data center being built in the town is the real power move while townsfolk are distracted by culture wars. * The Sheriff as a Symbol: Joe Cross embodies both traditional authority and the poisoned populism of social media-age politics. * Final Acts of Violence: Symbolize collapse under social pressure and loss of moral compass.
⭐️ Ratings * Michael: 4 out of 5 stars – “Bold, sharp, close to perfect…” * Dave: 4 out of 5 stars – “Difficult but essential viewing… very funny, deeply human…”
🗣️ Start of Reviews ⏱️ Timestamp: 40:50
- Michael opens the review section, defending the film’s boldness, satire, and visual style.
- Emphasizes how the film captures the chaos and performative energy of 2020.
- Strong praise for the thematic relevance and technical execution.
- Final rating: 4 out of 5 stars
⏱️ 46:31 – Dave’s Review
- Compares the emotional weight of Eddington to films like Civil War and No Country for Old Men.
- Praises the film for humanizing characters and confronting social disintegration.
- Final rating: 4 out of 5 stars
- Ends with a call for the film to be recognized as one of the most thought-provoking of the year.
🧠 Start of Thematic Discussion ⏱️ Timestamp: 50:34
“Let’s talk about the cacophony that is this film in our spoiler section…”
- 00:20 – Explores how Eddington portrays social media as a force of division, aligning with Ari Aster’s Wired interview.
- 01:11 – Aster’s quote about telling a coherent story from an incoherent miasma is discussed and praised.
- 02:15 – Dave references a protest scene and critiques performative activism in a majority-white town.
- 04:46 – Joe Cross as a stand-in for embodied social media, broadcasting manipulation via megaphone.
- 06:08 – Dave compares the film to Scorsese’s King of Comedy and Taxi Driver, especially in how antagonists are aggrandized.
- 07:26 – Michael analyzes characters like Sarah, pointing out value systems shaped entirely by online culture.
- 08:13 – Cross and the protesters mirror each other’s rhetoric but cannot communicate—highlighting echo chambers.
- 08:46–12:12 – The unhoused character is explored as a possible prophetic figure. The town ignores real suffering in favor of symbolic outrage.
- 12:25–14:11 – The sheriff’s arc from performative compassion to violence is unpacked. His choices reflect moral confusion and performative politics.
After some bad uploads and delays, for what is seems like 28 years after the release, Michael and Dave finally delve into the thematic and tonal complexity of 28 Years Later, a film they describe as both rich in ideas and somewhat disjointed. They focus on death, coming of age, and humanity in a post-apocalyptic world dominated by the infected.
🎬 Cast and Crew – 28 Years Later Director:
- Danny Boyle – Returns to direct this sequel after helming 28 Days Later (2002), marking a major reunion with the original creative team.
Writer:
- Alex Garland – Screenwriter of 28 Days Later and now known for Ex Machina and Annihilation, returns to pen this installment. His writing is noted for rich worldbuilding and philosophical themes.
Main Cast:
- Aaron Taylor-Johnson – Plays Spike’s hardened father, a forager from the island community.
- Jodie Comer – Portrays Spike’s mother, whose illness propels much of the plot.
- Ralph Fiennes – A mysterious doctor living among the infected on the mainland, deeply tied to the film’s reflections on death and dignity.
- Jack O’Connell – Reportedly plays the adult version of Jimmy, whose storyline ties back to the film’s prologue and culminates in the cult-like finale.
- Spike (actor unconfirmed) – A young boy coming of age in a world overrun by the infected; the central emotional figure of the film.
Producers:
- Andrew Macdonald
- Bernard Bellew
Production Companies:
- DNA Films
- Searchlight Pictures
Episode 96 – The Phoenician Scheme (Mindframes Podcast) Michael Cockerill and Dave Canfield discuss Wes Anderson's latest film, The Phoenician Scheme. The movie stars Benedict Cumberbatch, Michael Cera, Riz Ahmed, Meena Truppleton, and other regulars from Anderson’s filmography.
The story centers around Zaza Corda, a wealthy businessman played by Benicio del Toro, who makes the surprising decision to name his daughter—a nun—as his heir. He simultaneously launches a massive infrastructure project in the fictional country of Phoenicia (or Western Phoenicia), encountering opposition from terrorists, rival tycoons, and even his own brother.
Episode 95: The Life of Chuck
🔗 IMDb - The Life of Chuck (2025)
Cast & Crew:
- Director: Mike Flanagan
- Writer: Mike Flanagan (based on the short story by Stephen King)
-
Cast:
- Tom Hiddleston as Chuck
- Mark Hamill
- Chiwetel Ejiofor
- Karen Gillan
- Jacob Tremblay
- Matthew Lillard
- Harvey Guillén
- David Dastmalchian
- Mia Sara
- Q'orianka Kilcher
- Trinity Jo-Li Bliss
- Benjamin Pajak
Show Timestamps
00:00:15 – Michael introduces the film The Life of Chuck, its limited theatrical release, and welcomes special guest Ian Simmons of Kicking the Seat.
00:02:15 – The hosts briefly reflect on Mike Flanagan’s prior Stephen King adaptations, especially Doctor Sleep.
00:04:00 – Ian discusses reading the original short story The Life of Chuck after seeing the film, praising its fidelity to King’s source material.
00:06:03 – Dave and Michael share their personal histories with Flanagan's work, including Dave’s admiration and Michael’s familiarity with Midnight Mass.
00:08:03 – They begin analyzing Chuck’s character, noting the film's openness to interior interpretation and emotional resonance.
00:10:13 – Michael points out how Chuck’s dance scene operates like a monologue in conveying depth without dialogue, comparing it to Midnight Mass.
00:12:11 – Dave reflects on the challenge of adapting writers like Bradbury vs. King, noting King’s folksy, conversational dialogue works well on screen.
00:14:11 – Ian praises Flanagan’s scriptwriting, which invents dialogue that feels authentically King-like, even though it wasn't from the short story.
🎙️ Mindframes Episode 94: Friendship (2025) Theme: Male friendship, awkwardness, modern masculinity, repression Hosts: Dave Canfield & Michael Cockerill
🎬 Cast & Crew Director: Andrew DeYoung Writer: Andrew DeYoung Cinematographer: Andy Rydzewski Executive Producer: Paul Rudd
Cast:
- Tim Robinson as Craig Waterman – a painfully awkward suburban dad with delusions of friendship.
- Paul Rudd as Austin – a charming local weatherman with a hidden insecurities.
- Kate Mara as Craig’s wife – emotionally exhausted, but nuanced and grounded.
- Austin’s Bro Squad – unnamed ensemble portraying the elusive male friendship circle.
In this episode of Mindframes, Dave and Michael unpack Friendship (2025), a darkly comedic exploration of male loneliness, emotional repression, and the often-toxic rituals of adult male bonding. They praise the directorial debut of Andrew DeYoung and standout performances by Tim Robinson and Paul Rudd, noting how the film blends cringe humor with surprising visual and thematic depth. Drawing comparisons to The Master and The Holdovers, the hosts explore how Friendship critiques both the performative coolness of modern masculinity and the isolation it breeds. With humor and insight, they reflect on the film’s sobering message: real friendship is hard—and the world isn’t making it any easier.
🕒 Timestamps & Topics 00:00 – Intro Dave and Michael kick off the show with their signature Mindframes intro and reveal this episode’s focus: Friendship (2025), a genre-bending dark comedy.
00:51 – Film Overview Michael introduces the premise: a painfully awkward suburban dad becomes obsessed with his neighbor in what’s been described as a male Fatal Attraction.
02:28 – Release Status They note it’s in wide theatrical release and encourage people to see it soon.
03:29 – Director & Crew Background Andrew DeYoung's TV roots and lack of prior film experience are discussed, along with Andy Rydzewski’s commercial and TV cinematography background.
07:46 – Visual Style & Influences Muted colors, natural lighting, and inspiration from The Master and other dramas inform the film’s look. Michael mentions how shots are borrowed from Paul Thomas Anderson and how that affects tone.
12:39 – Tone: Comedy vs. Drama Dave and Michael praise the film's ability to mix dark comedy with character-driven drama, comparing it to The Holdovers and Dinner for Schmucks.
14:15 – Performances: Paul Rudd & Tim Robinson Both leads are praised for nuanced, funny, and sometimes heartbreaking performances. Tim reins in his trademark awkwardness to great effect.
16:42 – Casting & Type Discussion They debate whether Paul Rudd is playing against type and explore the contrast between his character here and in Death of a Unicorn.
19:00 – Supporting Cast: Kate Mara Dave praises Mara’s emotionally exhausted wife character as a well-drawn and important part of the story.
19:38 – Review Scores Michael gives it 3.5 stars, citing a lack of surprises; Dave agrees, mentioning a slightly weak ending.
23:29 – Spoiler Section Begins 🚨 Discussion shifts into spoiler-heavy analysis of themes and character arcs.
25:27 – Theme: Male Friendship Recession They reference a Guardian article about the decline of male friendships and reflect on Craig and Austin’s relationship as a modern commentary.
30:02 – Vulnerability & Masculinity They explore the emotional repression of both characters—Craig’s narcissism and Austin’s performative coolness.
34:42 – The Bro Squad & Toxic Dynamics Craig’s failed attempt to integrate with Austin’s friend group illustrates exclusion and fragile male social structures.
41:18 – Performative Masculinity & Props Austin’s toupee, hidden phone, and gold-plated gun are dissected as symbols of insecurity and hollow bravado.
47:22 – Satire, Empathy & the Message Dave and Michael agree the film isn’t offering answers—it’s critiquing the state of male connection and identity through black comedy.
52:51 – Final Thoughts & Outro They emphasize that the lack of resolution is part of the message. The film is a mirror, not a lesson plan.
54:38 – What’s Next on Mindframes? Teasing upcoming episodes on The Life of Chuck, The Phoenician Scheme, and possibly The Ritual.
55:35 – Contact Info Listeners are encouraged to send feedback via mindframesfilm.com and Facebook.
🎙️ Mindframe(s) Podcast – Episode 93 Mission: Impossible: Final Reckoning (and Franchise Retrospective) 🎬 Film Details * Title: Mission: Impossible – Final Reckoning * Director: Christopher McQuarrie * Writers: Christopher McQuarrie, Erik Jendresen * Main Cast:
+ Tom Cruise – Ethan Hunt
+ Hayley Atwell – Grace
+ Esai Morales – Gabriel
+ Ving Rhames – Luther Stickell
+ Simon Pegg – Benji Dunn
+ Rebecca Ferguson – Ilsa Faust
+ Pom Klementieff – Paris
⏱️ Timestamps & Highlights 00:15 – Intro Michael and Dave kick off with their usual charm, setting the tone for a franchise deep dive.
01:00 – Plot Recap Ethan Hunt faces off against “The Entity,” a rogue AI threatening global stability.
02:45 – McQuarrie & Cruise: The Power Duo Exploring their partnership from Rogue Nation to Final Reckoning.
04:00 – The Franchise Evolves Reflections on how the series matured post-MI:2, with J.J. Abrams, Brad Bird, and McQuarrie each leaving a mark.
06:30 – Cast Talk Revisiting the ensemble—Benji, Grace, Luther, Gabriel—and a few names we all struggle to remember.
08:00 – Film Reviews Michael: Solid entry but overdramatic. Dave: Incredible stunts, a bit scattered narratively.
13:10 – MI’s Long Legacy From its TV origins to blockbuster dominance—what keeps MI relevant?
17:00 – MI vs. Bond An argument for Hunt as the more ethical spy archetype.
23:00 – The Power of Practical Stunts Cruise’s death-defying feats as franchise identity.
26:00 – John Wick Comparison Fun detour comparing franchises—emotional vs. spectacle-driven action.
29:00 – Celebrating Cruise Behind-the-scenes appreciation for Tom Cruise’s intensity and kindness.
32:30 – Marketing the Stunt How each film builds its campaign around a singular Cruise stunt.
36:00 – Consistency Pays Off Why MI might be the most consistent franchise outside the superhero realm.
42:00 – What’s Next? Sneak peek at Friendship and Thunderbolts in upcoming episodes.
📬 Contact Us mindframesfilm.com
facebook.com/mindframesmovies
Now Playing Network: nowplayingnetwork.net
Got feedback or just want to geek out about movies with us? Reach out—we’d love to hear from you!
Absolutely! Here’s the same set of show notes with chapter timestamps added to guide listeners through the episode:
🎙️ Mindframes – Episode 92 “Sinners (2025): Vampires, Blues, and the Power of Community”
In this episode, Michael and Dave dive deep into Sinners, the bold, original horror-drama from director Ryan Coogler. Featuring Michael B. Jordan in a dual role and a breakout performance by Miles Katon, Sinners blends genre thrills with potent social commentary, historical resonance, and musical mysticism.
🧛♂️ Topics We Cover:
00:00 – Intro & Background
- Welcome and overview of Sinners
- Ryan Coogler’s directorial track record
- The film’s box office buzz and unique 25-year rights deal
07:00 – Coogler’s Style and Themes
- Socially conscious storytelling across Coogler’s films
- How Sinners fits in with Creed and Black Panther
09:00 – Cinematography & IMAX Impact
- Shot in 65mm IMAX—what it adds to the experience
- Natural light, cloudy skies, and thematic lighting shifts
- The power of visual framing and mise-en-scène
20:00 – Editing & Dual Performance Magic
- How the film nails having Michael B. Jordan play twins
- Why the editing feels seamless and emotionally grounded
24:00 – Music, Blues, and the Soundtrack
- The blues as culture, history, and emotional truth
- How the score becomes a character in the film
- A musical that isn’t a musical—but could be
26:30 – Cast Performances
- Michael B. Jordan’s award-worthy dual role
- Miles Katon’s emotional breakout
- Hailee Steinfeld, Delroy Lindo, and standout supporting cast
- A Chicago-based cameo worth cheering for
34:00 – Spoiler-Free Final Thoughts
- Emotional resonance and thematic impact
- Horror, humor, heart, and history
- Why it’s one of 2025’s most complete films
44:00 – Spoiler Section Begins
- Vampires as a metaphor for cultural appropriation
- The meaning of “Pick Poor Robin Clean”
- The juke joint as sanctuary and symbol
- The unforgettable ancestral musical scene
- Thematic reflections on sin, soul, and survival
🎬 Film on IMDb:
- Sinners (2025)
🎧 Mindframes
- Official Website
- Apple Podcasts
- Spotify
🎙️ Mindframes Episode 89: Mickey 17 "Clone Wars, Class Wars, and Saucy Politics in Space"
In this episode, Dave Canfield and Michael Cockerill dive into Mickey 17, Bong Joon-ho’s long-anticipated follow-up to Parasite. Set on a frozen alien planet, this satirical sci-fi tale stars Robert Pattinson as Mickey Barnes, a worker cloned repeatedly for hazardous missions — until one version survives and meets his successor.
🎬 What We Cover: * The Bong Joon-ho Cinematic Universe From Snowpiercer to Parasite to Barking Dogs Never Bite, how Bong’s signature blend of class critique, dark comedy, and genre-bending plays out in Mickey 17. * Cinematography with Darius Khondji A breakdown of the film’s visual tone, comparisons to Snowpiercer, High Life, and why the images may not quite match Bong's past visual highs. * Robert Pattinson's Multiverse of Performances Dave and Mike celebrate Pattinson’s career choices — from The Lighthouse to The Batman — and how he brings depth and humor to not one but two Mickeys. * Satire, Teeth, and Mark Ruffalo as a Space Trump A closer look at the film’s political commentary, from Ruffalo’s MAGA-esque cult leader to Toni Collette’s obsession with sauces and the absurdity of elite culture. * The Cloning Conundrum & Worker Exploitation Is Mickey 17 an empathy machine? The hosts explore themes of expendability, labor value, and late-stage capitalism through the lens of sci-fi cloning. * Comparisons & Influences The episode draws parallels to Moon, Us, High Life, The Empire Strikes Back, and even American Psycho — all filtered through Bong’s singular vision.
🔥 Quick Takes: * “Bong Joon-ho makes movies about people trapped in systems that don’t value them.” * “Toni Collette’s sauce obsession might be the most disturbing metaphor in the film.” * “It’s like High Life with a hint of hope.”
🧠 Bottom Line: This might not hit the same heights as Parasite or Snowpiercer, but it’s still sharp, visually compelling, and deeply Bong. The Mindframes hosts both rate it 4 out of 5 Mickeys — and recommend seeing it on the biggest screen you can.
💌 Join the conversation:
- Visit mindframesfilm.com
- Or hit us up on Facebook
🎧 Part of the Now Playing Network
🎙️ Mindframes Podcast – Episode 91: Warfare 🎧 Hosts: Michael Cockerill & Dave Canfield 🎬 Film: Warfare (2025), dir. Alex Garland & Ray Mendoza 📍 Location: Music Box Theatre, Chicago
⏱️ Timestamps & Segment Summaries: [00:00–01:30] — Intro & Film Overview Michael introduces the film Warfare, co-directed by Alex Garland (Ex Machina, Civil War) and Ray Mendoza, a real-life Navy SEAL. Set during the Iraq War in 2006, the film follows a SEAL team as a surveillance mission devolves into a real-time battle for survival.
[01:30–03:30] — Garland + Mendoza Collaboration The hosts highlight Garland’s visual language from Civil War and Mendoza’s military experience. Mendoza previously worked as a military advisor and makes his co-directorial debut, grounding the action in authenticity.
[03:30–05:30] — A New Kind of War Film Dave and Michael compare Warfare to cinema verité. It strips away backstory, plot arcs, and even music, placing viewers in the immediacy of war. The film’s realism makes it emotionally immersive rather than glorifying.
[05:30–10:00] — Comparing Garland’s Themes The hosts reflect on Garland’s previous works (Annihilation, Men, Ex Machina) and how Warfare departs from his usual metaphysical themes. While earlier films centered on confronting unknowns, Warfare is grounded and experiential.
[10:00–16:00] — Tone, Politics & Empathy Dave emphasizes Warfare’s non-political stance — it doesn't "pick sides" but immerses viewers in the soldiers’ experience. The film resists traditional “hoorah” war tropes, favoring a depiction of camaraderie, trauma, and ambiguity.
[16:00–22:00] — Acting & Realism Will Poulter is praised for his understated and believable performance. The cast’s lack of exposition or melodrama enhances the film’s immersive feel. The SEALs aren’t framed as superheroes — they’re human, fallible, and professional under extreme duress.
[22:00–30:00] — Real-Time Pacing & Directorial Choices The podcast explores how real-time pacing increases tension. There’s no music, no time skips, no omniscient viewpoint — just boots-on-the-ground survival. The set was a reconstructed Iraqi neighborhood, shot with handheld cameras and long takes to increase claustrophobia.
[30:00–40:00] — Cinematography as Philosophy The camera mimics a fellow soldier, crouching behind walls and moving with the characters. Michael and Dave liken this to the immersive style of 1917, though even more stripped down. Observational themes emerge as the camera shifts from viewer to viewed.
[40:00–47:00] — Production Design & Immersive Worldbuilding Details like era-appropriate gear, drone tech, and consistent physical space reinforce realism. Everything down to military language is authentic, thanks to Mendoza. This reinforces the film’s goal: not storytelling, but situational transference.
[47:00–56:00] — Why It’s Anti-War Without Saying So Michael and Dave argue that the film's realism is its anti-war statement. There's no need for speeches or political commentary — the relentless brutality and human cost speak volumes. Dave compares this to 1960s anti-war films like The War Game and Overlord.
[56:00–01:01:00] — Final Thoughts & Timelessness The film ends with ambiguity — no grand victory, just survival and confusion. Michael praises the restraint: “They leave. That’s the ending.” Dave notes how demythologizing war through realism creates a deeper, more honest emotional impact.
💬 Highlight Quotes: “It’s not about choosing sides. You just happen to be with the Americans.” – Dave “The movie doesn’t tell you what war is. It makes you feel what it’s like.” – Michael “Once you strip away the mythology, all that’s left is shellshock and dust.” – Dave
🎖️ Ratings: * Dave: ★★★★☆ — “One of the best anti-war films since the ‘70s.” * Michael: ★★★★☆ — “Raw, claustrophobic, and unforgettable.”
📽️ Films Referenced: * Civil War * Annihilation * Ex Machina * Men * 1917 * Black Hawk Down * Dunkirk * Apocalypse Now * The War Game * Overlord
🧛 Next Episode Tease: 🎬 Sinners — Michael B. Jordan’s vampire-demon hybrid film might be next on the docket.
Sure! Based on the transcript from Mindframes Episode 90 – "Death of a Unicorn", here are listener-friendly notes:
Episode 90: Death of a Unicorn A Mindframes Film Conversation Guests:
- 🎙️ Tarek Fayoumi (Chicago film critic)
🎬 Basic Info * Film: Death of a Unicorn * Director: Alex Scharfman (Directorial debut) * Genre: Black comedy with horror elements * Cast Highlights: + Paul Rudd as Elliot + Jenna Ortega as Ridley + Richard E. Grant as Odell + Will Poulter as Shepard + Téa Leoni as Odell's wife + Anthony Carrigan as Griff + Jessica Hynes as Shaw * Premiere: South by Southwest (SXSW) * Wide Release: This weekend (as of episode release)
🎭 Key Themes * Satire of the ultra-wealthy * Performative altruism * Corporate greed (nods to pharma industry) * Unicorns as metaphors — not for children! * Mashup of genre: horror + black comedy * Comparisons to Companion, Triangle of Sadness, and Black Sheep
⏱️ Timestamps & Highlights Timestamp Topic 00:00 Episode intro + guest Tarek Fayoumi joins 00:50 Overview of Death of a Unicorn & director Alex Scharfman 02:50 Early reactions and quirky tone of the film 05:30 Non-spoiler plot summary – unicorns, gore, and satire 06:57 Expanded plot: Paul Rudd’s character hits a unicorn en route to a CEO’s wilderness estate 08:00 Gore, vengeance, and absurdist turns 09:00 Neil deGrasse Tyson jokes and tonal weirdness 09:20 Cast discussion begins – Paul Rudd staying in his comedic “box” 11:00 Jenna Ortega’s horror film streak & flexibility as an actress 13:00 Will Poulter as a “punchable privileged” character with great comic timing 19:00 Téa Leoni praised for subtlety and satire – comparisons to Toni Collette 21:00 Recognition of supporting cast: Anthony Carrigan, Jessica Hynes, and Katherine Erbe 26:00 Commentary on satire and class critique 27:00 Cinematography discussion – possible nature doc inspiration 28:30 Importance of unicorn visuals – practical + CGI blend 32:00 Film was shot in Slovenia, animation outsourced – budget-conscious production 36:00 Cost-saving decisions and strategic casting choices 38:00 Discussion on shifting movie release windows and streaming vs theatrical landscape 39:30 Joke about popcorn buckets and box office trends 42:00 Reviews begin – Mike praises the genre blend and Will Poulter's performance 43:30 Dave praises the gore, creature effects, and genre fusion 46:00 Final verdict: 3 out of 4 unicorn horns from both hosts 47:00 Not for kids – don’t let the unicorns fool you! 48:00 Movie lacks a love story – passes a rare “MacDell test” Let me know if you’d like this formatted for a website or podcast show notes page — I can do that too!
Mindframes – Episode 88: The Monkey (2025) 🎙️ A sometimes half-assed but always wholehearted film conversation.
🔹 Hosts: Michael Cockerill & Dave Canfield 🔹 Episode Runtime: Approx. 56 minutes 🔹 Film Discussed: The Monkey (2025) 🔹 Directed by: Osgood Perkins 🔹 Based on: The Monkey (1980), a short story by Stephen King (Skeleton Crew)
🎬 General Information – The Monkey (2025) 🔻 Director: Osgood "Oz" Perkins (The Blackcoat’s Daughter, Longlegs, Gretel & Hansel) 🔻 Screenplay: Osgood Perkins 🔻 Based on: The Monkey by Stephen King 🔻 Cinematography: Nico Aguilar (Longlegs) 🔻 Special Effects Coordinator: Greg Pine (Final Destination-style death scenes!)
⭐ Cast Highlights * Theo James (Divergent) – Hal & Bill (Twin Brothers, Dual Role) * Christian Convery (Sweet Tooth) – Young Hal & Bill * Elijah Wood (The Lord of the Rings) – Hammerman, a self-help parenting guru * Tatiana Maslany (Orphan Black, She-Hulk) – Aunt Lois * Adam Scott (Severance, Parks & Rec) – Cameo as the Monkey’s former owner * Colin O’Brien (Wonka) – Petey * Rowan Campbell (The Hardy Boys) – Ricky
🛠️ Special Trivia * The toy monkey plays a drum, not cymbals, due to a legal conflict with Disney (Toy Story 3 featured a cymbal-playing monkey). * Limited edition popcorn bucket featuring the monkey was a sought-after collectible. * You can buy an official Monkey figurine for $125 at Neon’s store.
📌 Episode Breakdown & Timestamps [00:00] – Introduction * Michael and Dave introduce the episode and film under discussion.
[00:35] – What is The Monkey? * Background on the film’s origin from Stephen King’s short story. * Overview of Osgood Perkins’ horror film career.
[01:39] – Osgood Perkins as a Director * Dave shares his past interview with Perkins and how his films explore grief & trauma. * Perkins' stylistic shift from atmospheric horror to dark comedy.
[02:52] – How Different is This from Stephen King's Story? * King’s original story = pure dread. * This adaptation = comedic, absurd, yet still horror-infused.
[04:10] – Trivia: Why Doesn’t the Monkey Have Cymbals? * The monkey was originally designed with cymbals. * Disney’s legal team intervened (due to a character in Toy Story 3). * A drum was used instead—and now it's iconic.
[05:58] – Cast & Performances * Breakdown of the cast’s performances. * Theo James’ dual role as Hal & Bill—a highlight of the film. * Elijah Wood's role as a self-help guru satirizing modern parenting culture. * Tatiana Maslany’s role & why she stands out.
[09:47] – The Monkey's Death Scenes & Cinematography * The over-the-top death scenes add to the Final Destination-style fun. * Cinematography by Nico Aguilar (Longlegs) helps create aesthetic horror-comedy.
[15:48] – Special Effects & The Role of Blood * Mix of practical effects and CGI. * Hosts critique CGI blood overuse but praise the practical effects.
[18:46] – What is The Monkey Really About? * The film explores generational trauma. * Horror trend: Fathers passing down hidden burdens (Hereditary, The Wolfman). * The monkey symbolizes trauma that can’t be ignored.
[20:28] – How the Movie Handles Generational Trauma * Hal tries to escape it—but the monkey keeps coming back. * Final message: You can’t erase trauma, only learn to live with it.
[27:31] – The Film’s Ending (Spoilers) * The monkey is not destroyed—Hal and Petey drive away with it. * The Horseman of Death cameo—what does it mean? * School bus cheerleader decapitation scene: Meta-commentary on horror audiences?
[39:55] – The Mystery of Ricky (Fan Theory) * Could Ricky be Bill’s secret son? * Shared trauma & absentee fathers play a major role. * Closet uniform mystery—not everything adds up.
[42:44] – Final Thoughts & Reviews * Michael: Fun film, but not scary. * Dave: Perkins proves his range beyond horror. * Both agree: Worth watching, especially for horror-comedy fans.
[48:08] – What Would You Do If You Had The Monkey? * The monkey does NOT take requests—it kills on its own terms.
[55:01] – Closing & Next Episode * Next episode: Bong Joon-ho’s Mickey 17 starring Robert Pattinson. * Listener engagement: + Is The Monkey horror or comedy? + What do you think of its take on generational trauma? + Could there be a Monkey 2?
📲 Join the discussion: facebook.com/mindframesmovies 💬 Email Michael & Dave: mindframefilms.com
Episode Summary In this episode, Dave and Michael discuss Companion, the directorial debut from Drew Hancock. A mix of science fiction, dark comedy, and thriller, Companion follows Iris, a robot companion, as she navigates power dynamics and hidden agendas during a weekend getaway at a remote lakeside estate. The film explores themes of toxic relationships, control, and AI consciousness, all while delivering sharp humor and unexpected twists.
- Director: Drew Hancock
- Genre: Sci-Fi, Dark Comedy, Thriller
- Produced by: Barbarian creative team (Zach Cregger, Roy Lee, J.D. Lipschitz, Raphael Margolis)
- Cast:
- Sophie Thatcher (Yellowjackets, Heretic) as Iris
- Jack Quaid (The Boys) as Josh
- Lucas Gage (Euphoria, The White Lotus) as Patrick
- Megan Suri (It Lives Inside, Never Have I Ever) as Kat
- Harvey Guillén (What We Do in the Shadows) as Eli
- Rupert Friend (The Death of Stalin, Homeland) as Sergei
Timestamps & Discussion Highlights 00:00:15 - Introduction * Dave welcomes listeners to Mindframes and introduces the show’s format. * Michael reveals the movie they’re discussing: Companion (2024).
00:00:35 - Movie Overview * Companion is the directorial debut of Drew Hancock. * A science fiction, dark comedy, and thriller with "stabby stab" moments but not a full horror film. * The plot follows Iris, a robot companion, as she joins her human partner, Josh, for a weekend getaway that quickly turns into chaos.
00:02:06 - The Barbarian Connection * Produced by Zach Cregger (Barbarian), along with Roy Lee, J.D. Lipschitz, and Raphael Margolis. * Cregger was originally set to direct but handed the project to Hancock. * Shares some tonal shifts and unexpected turns similar to Barbarian.
00:03:59 - A Surprisingly Funny Movie * Marketed as horror, but the film has strong comedic elements. * Michael stopped watching the trailer halfway because it reveals too much. * Despite its darker themes, the humor is well-placed and helps with pacing.
00:04:26 - The Cast & Performances * Sophie Thatcher (Yellowjackets, Heretic) as Iris – A standout performance. * Jack Quaid (The Boys) as Josh – A departure from his usual roles, making him unrecognizable compared to his character Huey in The Boys. * Lucas Gage (Euphoria, The White Lotus) as Patrick – Cast as the “pretty guy.” * Megan Suri (It Lives Inside, Never Have I Ever) as Kat – A complex role. * Harvey Guillén (What We Do in the Shadows) as Eli – Comedic powerhouse, but hard not to see him as Guillermo. * Rupert Friend (The Death of Stalin, Homeland) as Sergei – A mix of comedic and sinister.
00:12:51 - Cinematography, Editing & Directing * Eli Bourne handles cinematography, giving the film an intimate, isolated feel. * Michael praises the film’s pacing and editing, crediting Josh Ether for helping keep the story sharp. * The location scouting is excellent, contributing to the film’s eerie atmosphere.
00:13:15 - The “Eat the Rich” Subgenre Comparison * Companion shares similarities with films like The Menu and Triangle of Sadness*. * Though not a direct critique of wealth, the film hints at class and power dynamics.
00:14:00 - January as a “Dumping Ground” for Movies * Companion was released in early 2024, a time studios often use to release movies they’re unsure how to market. * Despite this, the film is better than most January releases and deserves more recognition.
Themes & Analysis 00:28:05 - Toxic Relationships & Power Imbalances * Core theme: How control, manipulation, and exploitation manifest in relationships—both human and AI. * Companion raises questions about agency and autonomy, especially in imbalanced relationships.
00:29:25 - Gender & Objectification * Iris represents the struggles of real-world women who fight for autonomy in male-dominated spaces. * Historically, women were seen as property—a dynamic mirrored in Iris’s role as a “companion.”
00:30:51 - The Film’s Unique Take on AI Representation * Unlike many AI films that focus on “Pinocchio syndrome” (wanting to be real), Companion focuses on how people treat objects that can think and feel. * Dave argues that the film doesn’t necessarily “humanize” Iris, but Michael strongly disagrees, saying she’s treated as an individual from the start.
00:37:12 - The Relationship Between Josh & Iris * A perfect example of a toxic relationship. * Josh gaslights and controls Iris, using his “love” as a justification for ownership. * Parallels to real-life relationships where one partner holds all the power.
00:39:38 - Eli & Patrick: Love or Control? * Eli & Patrick’s relationship is framed as genuine, but Eli literally has a kill switch for Patrick. * Raises the question: Can there ever be real love when there’s an extreme power imbalance?
00:45:12 - Kat: A Different Kind of User * Kat manipulates Sergei for money, just as Josh uses Iris for companionship. * Unlike Josh, Kat is honest about her self-serving nature—making her an interesting contrast. * Her conversation with Iris about feeling “disposable” adds emotional depth to her character.
00:48:43 - Josh’s Downfall & The Role of Technology * Josh’s death by an automatic corkscrew is a symbol of his reliance on technology and the loss of control he thought he had. * Technology and control are central themes—whether AI, smart devices, or old-school CD players.
Verdict & Ratings 01:14:40 - Final Thoughts & Scores * Dave: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) - “One of the best AI movies in recent years.” * Michael: ⭐⭐⭐½ - ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (3.5 - 4/5) - “Great performances, strong pacing, and an excellent directorial debut.”
01:20:00 - Why You Should See Companion * Companion is in limited theatrical release, so see it before it’s gone! * Despite marketing challenges, it’s one of the best films of early 2024.
Closing Notes & Where to Watch * Companion is currently in wide release but may leave theaters soon. * Mindframes encourages listeners to share their thoughts via email.
📢 What did you think of Companion? Let us know! 📧 Email us with your thoughts!
Mindframes: The Presence – A Steven Soderbergh Experiment Episode Summary: In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave are joined by special guest Tarek Fayoumi (MoviesWithTarek.com, Chicago Indie Critics) to dissect Steven Soderbergh's new film, The Presence. They explore its unique point-of-view cinematography, thematic connections to isolation in modern horror, and its place within Soderbergh's diverse filmography. The trio also debates the film’s strengths, weaknesses, and whether it truly earns its ghost story label.
🔖 Topics & Timestamps: ⏳ 00:00:14 – Welcome & Introductions
- Michael & Dave introduce the show and their guest, Tarek Fayoumi.
- Tarek shares insights from his work as a film critic.
⏳ 00:01:57 – Overview of The Presence
- Introduction to The Presence, a ghost story with a unique POV perspective.
- Soderbergh's cinematography choices and how they affect immersion.
⏳ 00:03:06 – Tarek’s Experience with Soderbergh
- How Soderbergh creates realism in his films.
- Discussion of his past work, including Contagion and the Ocean’s films.
⏳ 00:04:51 – What Makes The Presence Unique?
- The film’s VR-like cinematography and immersive ghostly POV.
- How the film builds tension without traditional horror tropes.
⏳ 00:05:22 – Ghost Story Influences
- Comparing The Presence to films like The Others, The Sixth Sense, and The Haunting.
- How it differs from found footage and traditional ghost stories.
⏳ 00:08:00 – David Koepp’s Writing & The Ending Debate
- Discussion of screenwriter David Koepp’s contributions (Jurassic Park, Stir of Echoes).
- Does the film’s ending work? Michael & Dave share mixed feelings.
⏳ 00:15:28 – Soderbergh’s Diverse Career: Any Common Threads?
- Oceans 11, Erin Brockovich, Solaris, and Sex, Lies, and Videotape – what connects them?
- Soderbergh’s recurring themes of surveillance, observation, and isolation.
⏳ 00:22:54 – Official Synopsis & Final Thoughts
- A family moves into a suburban home and suspects they are not alone…
- The Presence as an atmospheric rather than traditional horror.
⏳ 00:24:43 – Reviews & Star Ratings
- Dave: Compelling but imperfect; worth rewatching.
- Michael: A solid 3/5 stars – eerie but flawed.
- Tarek: 3/4 stars – an experimental approach that mostly works.
⏳ 00:30:23 – Spoiler Discussion: What is The Presence Really About?
- The film’s twist ending and character revelations.
- Comparing the film’s isolation themes to The Babadook, Hereditary, and Smile.
⏳ 00:41:50 – Isolation in Horror Films (Post-2010)
- The rise of horror exploring loneliness, grief, and societal detachment.
- Films like Midsommar, Talk to Me, Alone With You, and I Saw the TV Glow.
⏳ 00:52:04 – Final Thoughts on the Family Dynamics
- Lucy Liu as the mom – how does she fit into this role?
- The dad as a "perfect but helpless" figure.
🔗 Follow Us:
- 🌐 https://www.facebook.com/mindframesMovies
- 🌐 www.mindframesfilm.com
- 🎥 Guest: Tarek Fayoumi – MoviesWithTarek.com
In this episode of MindFrames, Dave and Michael break down the best films of 2024. With themes ranging from authoritarianism and resilience to identity and connection, the hosts discuss how these movies reflect and challenge the cultural zeitgeist. They also dive into the year’s standout horror films and share their thoughts on the Oscars' major contenders.
Timestamps and Topics * [00:00:16] Welcome and Introduction Dave and Michael set the tone for the episode, outlining their approach to discussing the best films of 2024. * [00:01:18] Reflecting on the Year in Film The hosts share general thoughts on 2024 in cinema—was it a year of classics or just solid hits? * [00:02:09] Horror Highlights of 2024
Dave and Michael praise the exceptional year for horror, with standout titles like The Substance, Nosferatu, and Cuckoo.
- [00:03:22] Oscar Campaigns and Predictions A lively discussion about the politics of Oscar campaigns, including surprises, snubs, and predictions.
- [00:04:49] Themes of 2024 in Film Michael discusses the criteria that shaped his top 10 list, emphasizing themes like despair, resilience, and power dynamics.
- [00:06:44] Top 10 Films: Starting with Nickel Boys
Michael explains why Nickel Boys made his list, focusing on its themes and performances, while Dave critiques its filmmaking style.
- [00:09:16] Dave’s Horror List and Honorable Mentions Dave shares his top horror films of 2024, including Alien: Romulus and Handling the Undead.
- [00:15:11] A Complete Unknown: A Deep Dive Michael highlights Timothy Chalamet’s performance as Bob Dylan in this period drama, reflecting on its relevance to today.
- [00:28:09] Thematic Standouts: The Substance vs. Nosferatu
A comparison of two horror standouts, with Michael favoring The Substance for its timely relevance and Dave praising Nosferatu’s timelessness.
- [00:50:20] International Gems: The Seed of the Sacred Fig Michael explores the Iranian allegory for authoritarianism and resilience, reflecting on its layered storytelling.
- [01:00:06] Animated Masterpiece: Flow Dave describes this visually stunning Latvian animated film, tying it to themes of community, refugees, and environmental decline.
- [01:03:28] Sean Baker’s Anora: A Human Story
The hosts celebrate Anora as a funny, heartfelt, and raw depiction of resilience and humanity, with standout performances and themes.
- [01:08:07] Closing Thoughts and Listener Recommendations Dave and Michael reflect on how the year’s films resonate with ongoing cultural conversations and share what’s next for MindFrames.
Dave's non-ordered list(s) A Different Man Seed of the Sacred Fig All We Imagine As Light Civil War Red Rooms The Substance Wicked Flow A Real Pain Sing Sing
HONORABLE MENTIONS
The Girl with the Needle The Room Next Door Anora Conclave September 5 Hard Truths
Michael's list 1. Sing Sing 2. Conclave 3. Anora 4. The Seed of the Sacred Fig 5. The Brutalist 6. The Substance 7. Nosferatu 8. A Real Pain 9. Wicked 10. A Complete Unknown 11. Nickel Boys
Mentioned Films * The Substance * Nosferatu * A Complete Unknown * Nickel Boys * Flow * Anora * The Seed of the Sacred Fig * Wicked * Handling the Undead * Alien: Romulus * Red Rooms * The Brutalist
Where to Find Us www.mindframesfilm.com
Mindframes Episode: Robert Eggers’ Nosferatu Summary: In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave explore Robert Eggers' reimagining of the classic silent film Nosferatu. They discuss Eggers’ meticulous approach to filmmaking, the legacy of Nosferatu, and the cultural evolution of vampires in cinema. The conversation touches on German Expressionist cinematography, standout performances, and the thematic depth of the film. They also reflect on how vampires mirror societal fears across decades, from early depictions of monstrous villains to modern sympathetic portrayals.
Timestamps:
00:00 – Introduction
- Overview of the podcast and today’s topic: Robert Eggers’ Nosferatu.
- Michael and Dave reflect on their history with Eggers’ films.
05:30 – The Legacy of Nosferatu
- A look back at the 1922 silent film and its influence on cinema.
- Discussion of previous adaptations, including Werner Herzog’s 1979 version.
12:00 – Eggers’ Filmmaking Style
- Comparison to Ridley Scott’s attention to detail and world-building.
- How Eggers adapts myths in The Northman, The Witch, and Nosferatu.
17:45 – Spoiler-Free Review
- Praise for the German Expressionist-inspired cinematography.
- Discussion of Lily-Rose Depp’s performance and Count Orlok’s menacing presence.
- The thought-provoking and ambiguous ending.
25:00 – Vampires in Cinema: A Cultural Lens
- How vampires have evolved from monstrous threats to sympathetic figures.
- Examples from Dracula (1931), Dark Shadows (1966), and Interview with the Vampire (1994).
- The resurgence of evil, monstrous vampires in recent films like Let the Right One In and The Last Voyage of the Demeter.
38:30 – Thematic Analysis of Nosferatu
- Count Orlok as a symbol of predation and isolation.
- Ellen’s mystical connection to Orlok and her ultimate sacrifice.
- Reflections on societal fears of disease, isolation, and evil.
50:00 – Final Thoughts and Recommendations
- How Eggers’ Nosferatu compares to his earlier films.
- Other films mentioned: The Lighthouse, The Witch, Herzog’s Nosferatu, and Let the Right One In.
- Upcoming episodes teased: Best of 2024, The Wolfman, and animation coverage.
Where to Find Us:
- Website: mindframesfilm.com
- Facebook: facebook.com/mindframesmovies
- Podcast Network: Now Playing Network
Next Episode:
- Best Films of 2024 (tentative)
Podcast Episode Description:
In this episode of Mindframes, Michael Cockerill and Dave Canfield dive into the chilling world of Heretic, the latest horror film by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods (A Quiet Place). We explore the film's themes of faith, control, and belief, contrasting its intellectual horror with its visceral thrills. Join us as we analyze Hugh Grant's standout performance as the sinister Mr. Reed, the dynamic interplay between the two Mormon missionaries, Sister Barnes and Sister Paxton, and the movie's ambiguous exploration of spirituality and skepticism.
Whether you're intrigued by the film's intricate set design, its dialogue-driven narrative, or its controversial take on religious and philosophical themes, this episode is for you. We also share insights on how Heretic fits into the broader landscape of 2024's standout horror films, with comparisons to Hereditary, Get Out, and The Exorcist. Tune in to hear our recommendations and join the conversation about one of the year's most thought-provoking horror films.
Podcast Summary with Timestamps
0:00 – 1:00 – Intro Michael and Dave introduce the episode, setting the stage for a deep dive into Heretic by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods. They touch on the directors’ previous works (A Quiet Place, Haunt) and their distinct horror style.
1:01 – 5:30 – Overview of Heretic A brief plot summary: Two Mormon missionaries, Sister Barnes (Sophie Thatcher) and Sister Paxton (Chloe East), find themselves trapped by Mr. Reed (Hugh Grant), whose philosophical and theological challenges evolve into a fight for survival.
5:31 – 12:00 – Themes of Faith and Control The hosts explore the film’s central themes, including the idea of religion as a mechanism of control versus a source of hope. Mr. Reed’s character embodies skepticism, while the missionaries represent differing interpretations of belief.
12:01 – 18:30 – Performances and Character Dynamics Hugh Grant’s portrayal of Mr. Reed is highlighted as a standout performance. The hosts delve into the dynamic between the sisters, contrasting Sister Barnes’ depth of faith with Sister Paxton’s cultural adherence.
18:31 – 24:00 – Set Design and Technical Elements A discussion on the film’s claustrophobic set design, the use of close-ups, and the intricate dollhouse motif that symbolizes control and manipulation.
24:01 – 30:00 – Comparisons to Other Films Connections are drawn to Hereditary, Get Out, and The Exorcist. The hosts note Heretic’s unique blend of intellectual and visceral horror and its place within 2024’s strong lineup of religious-themed horror films.
30:01 – 35:00 – Spoiler Section: Plot Twists and Ending A dive into the film’s third act and its ambiguous ending. The hosts debate whether the film effectively balances its critique of faith and religion with its horror elements.
35:01 – 40:00 – Final Thoughts and Recommendations Michael and Dave share their final impressions, recommending Heretic for its bold themes and strong performances. They reflect on how the film leaves viewers questioning belief, control, and the power of faith.
40:01 – End – Outro The hosts close the episode, previewing a potential future discussion on Conclave, another film tackling themes of faith and religion. They invite listeners to connect with Mindframes online and thank them for tuning in.
Episode 82 on The Substance
Summary In this episode, Michael and Dave dive into The Substance, a film by Coralie Fargeat. The film explores the dark and gritty side of Hollywood’s obsession with youth, following Elizabeth Sparkle (Demi Moore), a former aerobic star who turns to a mysterious serum for a youthful transformation. This risky choice leads her into a twisted psychological battle with her younger self, Sue (Margaret Qualley), as the two are forced to switch bodies every seven days.
Key Discussion Points
- Plot Overview: The film's exploration of ageism, Hollywood’s beauty standards, and the battle between youthful ambition and the wisdom of age.
- Director’s Style: Coral Le Far’s cinematic techniques, reminiscent of her previous work in Revenge, and visual callbacks to classic horror films like The Shining and The Fly.
- Cinematography and Sound Design: Praise for cinematographer Benjamin Krakun and sound designer Emmanuel's Yard, creating a contrast between Hollywood’s bright artificiality and the film’s dark themes.
- Practical Effects: Emphasis on the effective use of prosthetics and 1980s-inspired effects over CGI, with comparisons to movies like The Thing and Requiem for a Dream.
Memorable Moments
- Shrimp Scene: The “disgusting” and metaphorical close-up of Dennis Quaid’s character devouring shrimp, symbolizing Hollywood’s consumption of aging stars.
- Body Horror: Discussions on the intense practical effects, leading to some wince-inducing moments that play with medical horror aesthetics.
- Themes of Identity and Self-Worth: The hosts analyze how the film examines the lengths people go to in order to stay relevant and young, questioning the true “value” of beauty and fame.
Ratings and Final Thoughts
- Michael gives the film four stars, highlighting its timely commentary on youth obsession, while Dave awards it five stars, calling it one of the best films of the year. Both agree on the standout performances by Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley, predicting Oscar buzz.
Cultural Commentary The hosts reflect on Hollywood's commodification of beauty and youth, pointing out how the film exposes the industry’s relentless pursuit of “perfection” and the unrealistic standards imposed on women.
Looking Forward Next episode, Michael and Dave consider reviewing Heretic, an A24 horror film, or exploring other films relevant to award season buzz.
Connect with Us Visit our website mindframesfilm.com or find us on Facebook at MindframesMovies for more insights, and feel free to reach out if you’d like to be a guest or suggest a movie!
- Introduction to The Substance 00:00:15 - Michael welcomes listeners and introduces the movie The Substance.
- Plot Summary & Themes 00:00:42 - Dave gives a brief overview of the film’s plot, focusing on Elizabeth Sparkle’s battle with her younger self, Sue. 00:02:17 - Michael and Dave discuss the film’s themes of ageism, youth obsession, and identity in Hollywood.
- Director and Cinematography
00:03:01 - Discussion of Coral Le Far’s style, including her previous work on Revenge and the “revenge movie” genre. 00:04:09 - Michael describes the vibrant color palette and camera work, including hallway shots reminiscent of The Shining.
- Shrimp Scene & Sound Design 00:05:34 - Michael and Dave analyze the infamous “shrimp scene” with Dennis Quaid’s character, highlighting the film’s sound design. 00:07:06 - Praise for Emmanuel’s Yard’s work on the sound effects, enhancing the visceral experience.
- Practical Effects and Body Horror 00:09:07 - Dave discusses the impressive practical effects, comparing them to The Thing and emphasizing the grotesque elements that made even seasoned horror fans look away.
- Discussion on Hollywood and Beauty Standards
00:13:38 - Michael and Dave explore the film’s commentary on Hollywood’s treatment of aging women and the pressures of beauty standards.
- Performances by Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley 00:14:22 - The hosts delve into the powerful performances, especially Demi Moore’s nuanced portrayal of Elizabeth, and Margaret Qualley’s rising-star status.
- Film References & Influences 00:50:38 - The hosts compare The Substance to other films like The Elephant Man, Frankenstein, The Fly, and Carrie, discussing how these influences shape the film’s narrative and aesthetic.
- Ratings and Spoiler-Free Reviews
00:17:09 - Michael and Dave each give their spoiler-free ratings, with Michael awarding four stars and Dave giving it five.
- Third-Act Discussion & Moral Takeaways 00:46:18 - Spoiler discussion on the third act, where the hosts interpret the film’s moral stance on aging, beauty, and acceptance.
- Closing and Next Episode Preview 00:57:04 - Dave previews potential films for the next episode, including Heretic, an A24 horror movie, as well as Rumors, a film featuring Tilda Swinton.
Episode Summary: In this fun and lively episode, Michael and David take a break from their usual thematic deep dives to enjoy the highly anticipated film "Deadpool and Wolverine." Join them as they explore the movie's humor, fourth-wall breaks, cameos, and more. This episode is packed with laughs, insightful critiques, and a healthy dose of fan service.
Key Discussion Points:
-
Introduction (00:15 - 01:11):
- The usual format involves pulling out one theme from a movie, but this episode is kept light and free to match the film's tone.
- Introduction to "Deadpool and Wolverine," starring Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman.
-
Director and Production (01:11 - 02:12):
-
Directed by Sean Levy, who previously worked with Ryan Reynolds on "Free Guy."
- The film is described as a buddy comedy made by buddies.
-
Humor and Fourth-Wall Breaks (02:12 - 06:35):
-
The movie is filled with jokes, cameos, and references that require multiple viewings to catch all details.
- Outrageously violent and vulgar in keeping with Deadpool's character.
-
Favorite Moments and Cameos (06:35 - 11:18):
-
Highlights include cameos from Henry Cavill and Chris Evans.
- Discussion on how the film plays with meta-references and nostalgia.
-
Comparisons and Critiques (11:18 - 13:54):
-
Compared favorably to other superhero films like "Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness."
- Praised for its self-awareness and comedic tone.
-
Fan Service (13:54 - 18:07):
-
The film is described as fan service done right.
- Michael appreciates the movie for being honest about its intentions and serving the fans well.
-
Character Development and Themes (18:07 - 34:48):
-
Discussions on character growth, particularly for Wolverine and Deadpool.
- Use of iconic costumes and staying true to the characters' comic origins.
-
Upcoming Films and Recommendations (34:48 - 48:45):
-
Mentions of upcoming films like "Twisted Metal," "Long Legs," and "Alien Romulus."
- Recommendations for future episodes and a look at some intriguing trailers.
Quotes:
- "This movie breaks the fourth wall so often you will literally need to see it twice just to get all of that."
- "I am a fan. Serve me."
- "It's a buddy comedy made by buddies."
Final Thoughts (44:04 - 48:45):
- Michael and David agree that "Deadpool and Wolverine" is a fun ride with beloved characters, making it worth the watch.
- The episode ends with a look forward to future movies and potential podcast topics.
Mind Frames Podcast - Episode 79: Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga Overview: In this episode, Michael and Dave delve into the newest installment of the Mad Max universe, Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga. Directed by George Miller, this film explores the origin story of Imperator Furiosa, previously portrayed by Charlize Theron in Mad Max: Fury Road, now played by Anya Taylor-Joy. Join the hosts as they discuss the film's thematic elements, casting choices, and how it fits into the larger Mad Max franchise.
Key Topics: Introduction to Mind Frames (00:00 - 00:24) Overview of the podcast and the format of the show.
Film Introduction (00:25 - 00:52) Introduction of Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga. Brief synopsis and connection to Mad Max: Fury Road.
Discussion on George Miller (01:43 - 03:33) George Miller’s influence on the post-apocalyptic genre. His versatility as a filmmaker with works like Babe and Happy Feet.
Thematic Elements in George Miller’s Films (03:35 - 06:32) Themes of human society’s impact on the world. Comparison of themes across Miller’s diverse filmography.
Casting Choices (07:21 - 10:51) Anya Taylor-Joy’s performance as Furiosa. Physical and stylistic differences between Anya Taylor-Joy and Charlize Theron. Discussion of Chris Hemsworth’s role as Dementus and his comedic influence.
Character Analysis (10:55 - 12:31) Examination of Furiosa’s character development. Comparison between Furiosa in Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga and Mad Max: Fury Road.
Chris Hemsworth as Dementus (15:45 - 19:17) Analysis of Hemsworth’s performance and character. Discussion on the balance of humor and menace in his role.
Immortan Joe and Prequels (19:18 - 22:06) Role of Immortan Joe in Furiosa. Challenges of integrating iconic characters into prequels.
Supporting Characters (23:05 - 26:04) Discussion on Tom Burke’s character and his role in Furiosa’s story. Critique of the necessity of his character in the narrative.
Cinematography and Visuals (27:24 - 30:14) Comparison of cinematography in Furiosa and Fury Road. Use of CGI and its impact on the film’s visual appeal.
Action Sequences (30:15 - 31:33) Overview of the film’s action sequences and stunt work. Comparison to other action movies of the year.
Box Office Performance and Marketing (31:34 - 42:31) Discussion on the film’s box office performance. Analysis of marketing strategies and their impact on the film’s reception.
Cultural Impact and Audience Reception (42:32 - 50:01) Broader discussion on the cultural impact of the film. Comparison of audience reception across different demographics.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations (50:01 - 53:01) Hosts’ final thoughts on Furiosa. Recommendations for exploring more of George Miller’s work.
Conclusion: Michael and Dave conclude the episode with reflections on George Miller’s filmmaking career and the significance of Furiosa within the Mad Max franchise. They also touch upon broader trends in the film industry and audience preferences.
Next Episode: ?????
Follow Us: - Website: mindframesfilm.com - Network: Now Playing Network
The Complexities of "Civil War" and the Intricacies of Alex Garland's Direction
In this episode of "Mindframes," hosts Dave and M.W. Cockerill delve into Alex Garland's latest film, "Civil War," exploring its portrayal of a polarized America and the role of media in war contexts. The discussion traverses Garland's filmography, highlighting his distinctive approach to filmmaking and thematic consistency across his works. The episode also touches on broader film genres, notably the categorization challenges within horror and zombie films, using "28 Days Later" as a focal point.
Key Discussion Points 1. Alex Garland's Directorial Style: Insight into Garland's evolution as a director, with a detailed discussion on his notable films including "Ex Machina," "Annihilation," and "Men." The hosts explore how these films align thematically with "Civil War." 2. Genre Definitions and Controversies: A lively debate on what constitutes a zombie film, referencing "28 Days Later" and other genre films like "The Walking Dead" and "I Am Legend." 3. "Civil War" - A Film Analysis: - Plot and Setting: Examination of the film's setting in a dystopian America, discussing the world-building elements and the narrative's focus on societal breakdown. - Character Development and Performances: Discussion on the character arcs, particularly focusing on the performances of Kristen Dunst and other key actors. - Themes: Deep dive into the political and social themes portrayed in the film, such as division, media influence, and the impact of leadership styles reminiscent of contemporary political figures. - Cinematic Techniques: Analysis of Garland's use of visual and sound design to enhance the thematic depth and emotional impact of the film.
Special Segments - Horror Film Debate: Is "Civil War" a horror movie? Hosts debate the genre specifications and the broader implications of genre categorization in film. - Viewer Reactions and Interpretations: Exploration of varied audience reactions to the film, particularly focusing on its political commentary and its reflection of real-world tensions.
Closing Thoughts - The hosts reflect on the implications of "Civil War" for future filmmaking in politically charged climates. - Recommendations for audiences on how to approach the film to gain a deeper understanding of its themes.
Where to Watch: "Civil War" is currently in wide release and available exclusively in theaters, including IMAX.
Episode Links: - Stream this episode and subscribe to "Mindframes" on iTunes, Spotify, Google Play, and wherever podcasts are available. - Visit our website at mindframesfilms.com for more insights and discussions.
Episode 76, "Navigating the Sands of Dune Part Two" Episode Summary: In this enthralling episode, Michael and Dave embark on a journey through the expansive deserts of Denis Villeneuve's "Dune Part Two." From the continuation of Paul Atreides' epic saga to the deep philosophical underpinnings of messianism and political intrigue, the hosts dissect the film's thematic complexities and its directorial prowess. Join us as we compare Villeneuve's adaptation to its cinematic and literary predecessors, speculate on the potential directions for the franchise, and reflect on the broader impact of "Dune" on the future of film and cinema culture.
Show Notes:
- [00:00:00] - Introduction to "Mind Frames" and today's focus on "Dune Part Two."
- [00:01:30] - Overview of "Dune Part Two," including its narrative continuation from "Dune Part One" and initial thoughts on the film's impact.
- [00:05:00] - Deep dive into Denis Villeneuve's directorial style, examining how his vision and thematic focus contribute to the "Dune" universe.
- [00:10:45] - Analysis of religious and political themes in "Dune Part Two," exploring the portrayal of Paul Atreides as a messianic figure and the interplay between faith and power.
- [00:20:30] - Comparison with previous "Dune" adaptations, including the 1984 film, and discussion on the challenges and successes of Villeneuve's approach.
- [00:30:00] - Speculation on future films in the "Dune" series, potential plot developments, and the continuation of thematic exploration.
- [00:40:00] - The cultural impact of "Dune" and its significance in the context of modern cinema. Discussion on the shift from traditional movie-going experiences to streaming platforms and "Dune's" role in this evolution.
- [00:50:00] - Closing thoughts on "Dune Part Two" and its place in the pantheon of science fiction cinema.
- [00:55:00] - Final remarks and preview of the next episode of "Mind Frames."
Resources Mentioned:
- Denis Villeneuve's Filmography
- "Dune" by Frank Herbert
- "Blade Runner 2049" and its thematic parallels with "Dune"
- The cultural phenomenon of movie-going as an event and its future
Connect with Us:
- Email: michael@mindframesfilm.com or dave@mindframesfilm.com
- Website: mindframesfilm.com
Dave and Michael discuss their five go-to movies for 2023, along with some initial Oscar reactions, and a lot of honorable mentions.
The Mindframe(s) must-sees of 2023
Killers of the Flower Moon
Oppenheimer
Barbie
The Holdovers
- Anaita Wali Zada as Donya
- Jeremy Allen White as Daniel
- Gregg Turkington as Dr. Anthony
- Hilda Schmelling as Joanna
- Avis See-tho as Fan
- Siddique Ahmed as Salim
- Taban Ibraz as Mina
- Timur Nusratty as Suleyman
- Eddie Tang as Ricky
- Jennifer McKay as Lin
- Divya Jakatdar as Amaya
- Fazil Seddiqui as Aziz
- Molly Noble as Molly
- Enoch Ku as Jason
- Sich Liu as Restaurant Worker
- Bettina Devin as Ellen (uncredited)
- Gisele Matocq as Restaurant Patron (uncredited)
- Corey Seaver as Deliveryman (uncredited)
- Nisha Steiger as Restaurant Patron (uncredited)
Timestamps
00:00 - 12:16 Intro and Background
12:36 - 21:37 Spoiler-free reviews
21:37 - 54:50 The theme of resilience in Fremonet
54:50 0 End Outro
This episode’s topics
Start - 18:23 Greta Gerwig and the people who made Barbie
18:23 - 41:35 Mindframes reviews
Conversation 1: Barbie and the Millennial experience
Conversation 2: IP in films, are more toys movies coming (yes)
Film info
Imdb https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1517268/
Barbie suffers a crisis that leads her to question her world and her existence.
In wide release and coming to IMAX….somehow!
Crew
- Greta Gerwig as director and co-writer
- Noah Baumbach as co-writer
- Robbie Brenner as producer
- David Heyman as producer
- Ynon Kreiz as producer
Cast
- Margot Robbie as Barbie
- Ryan Gosling as Ken
- Issa Rae as President Barbie
- Kate McKinnon as Weird Barbie
- Alexandra Shipp as Writer Barbie
- Emma Mackey as Physicist Barbie
- Hari Nef as Doctor Barbie
- Simu Liu as Skipper
- America Ferrera as Gloria
- Will Ferrell as the CEO of Barbie
- Ncuti Gatwa as a drag queen
- Sharon Rooney as Lawyer Barbie
- Ana Cruz Kayne as Judge Barbie
- Rhea Perlman as Betty
- Michael Cera as Ryan Gosling's character's best friend
- Kingsley Ben-Adir as a character described as "a doll with an attitude"
- Emerald Fennell as an unknown character
- Ritu Arya as Journalist Barbie
- Dua Lipa as Mermaid Barbie
-
Nicola Coughlan as Diplomat Barbie
-
Tom Ackerley as producer
In this episode of Mindframe(s), Michael and Dave discuss Christopher Nolan's new film, Oppenheimer. Our hosts praise the film's technical achievements and discuss the flaws and triumphs of the titular character in the non-spoiler section. Cillian Murphy gives a stunning performance, and you'll have to listen to find out how much forgiveness and sympathy our hosts ended up giving this depiction of the "Father of the Atom Bomb."
Crew
- Director: Christopher Nolan
- Screenwriters: Christopher Nolan, Kai Bird, Martin Sherwin
- Producers: Christopher Nolan, Charles Roven, Emma Thomas
- Cinematographer: Hoyte Van Hoytema
- Editor: Jennifer Lame
- Music: Ludwig Göransson
- Distributed by: Universal Pictures
Cast
- Cillian Murphy as J. Robert Oppenheimer
- Emily Blunt as Kitty Oppenheimer
- Robert Downey Jr. as Lewis Strauss
- Matt Damon as Leslie Groves Jr.
- Alden Ehrenreich as Senate Aide
- Scott Grimes as Counsel
- Jason Clarke as Roger Robb
- Jack Quaid as Thomas Morgan
- Gary Oldman as Harry S. Truman
- Tony Goldwyn as Gordon Gray
- Rami Malek as Benny Safdie
- John Gowans
- Ward Evans
- Dane DeHaan
- Macon Blair
- Lloyd Garrison
- James D'Arcy
- Patrick Blackett
The Flash
Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One
Introduction:
Welcome to "Mindframe(s)", the podcast where Dave and Michael try to pull themes and ideas relevant to our modern world from the world of movies.
Overview:
In this episode, Dave and Michael discuss Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse and its portrayal of America's complicated, diverse, and intersected youth.
Timestamps:
- 00:00 - 20:29 Intro
- 20:30 - 27:05 Spoiler-free reviews
- 27:05 - 59:42 Spider-Man across the Spider-verse and Intersectionality
- 59:52 - End Outro
Links and Resources:
- https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9362722/
Social Media Links:
- Like us on Facebook: facebook.com/mindframesMovies
- Visit our website: https://mindframesfilm.com/
- Find us on the Now Playing Network: https://www.nowplayingnetwork.net/mindframes
Ari Aster's new surreal film Beau is Afraid is more likely to leave you confused than fearful, but Michael and Dave love it all the same.
00:00 - 00:57 Intro and synopsis 00:57 - 09:14 Is Ari Aster a millennial master? 09:14 - 19:02 Joaquin Phoenix and the cast 19:02 - 24:39 Spoiler Free reviews 24:39 - 33:25 The world construct of Beau is Afraid 33:25 - 36:34 What is wrong with Beau? 36:34 - 42:41 Beau's apartment 42:41 - 47:30 Grace and Roger's house 47:30 - 57:40 The forest 57:30 - 1:10:29 "Home" 1:10:29 - 1:16:11 Beau's Trial 1:16:11 - 1:23:11 Theme's shard with Hereditary
Dave and Michael tackle the outrageous world of "Renfield," a film that follows the comical journey of Dracula's henchman as he tries to break free from what has been reframed in modern terms as a toxic codependent relationship with the notorious Count. Nicolas Cage delivers a full-Cage performance as Dracula. Renfeild offers a feast of side-splitting humor, sometimes literal side-splitting, great performances, and great entertainment that is worth going to a theater to see.
Dave and Michael recommend five movies from 2022 that you shouldn't miss. We discuss why we chose these and why they scream, "2022." We abuse the word "zeitgeist" for your enjoyment.
They are
-
RRR
-
The Batman
-
The Banshees of Inisherin
-
Everything Everywhere All at Once
-
Tar
A special guest joins the guys for a very serious discussion of WEIRD, a hard-hitting biopic on the late "Weird" Al Yankovic.
The modern zeitgeist seems destined to waver between despair and daring to hope, and "Everything Everywhere All at Once" perfectly dissects that phenomenon. How it does that is our thematic discussion for this excellent film.
Timestamp of contents
Intro 00:00 - 15-:21
Spoiler-free reviews 15:21 - 22:12
Our Theme discussion: Hope and Despair in "Everything..." And Modern US zeitgeist 22:12 - 1:08:48
Misc Love and nice touches 1:08:48 - 1:16:40
What movies is this like? 1:16:40 - 1:23:02
Outro 1:23:00 - End
The modern zeitgeist seems destined to waver between despair and daring to hope, and "Everything Everywhere All at Once" perfectly dissects that phenomenon. How it does that is our thematic discussion for this excellent film.
Timestamp of contents
Intro 00:00 - 15-:21
Spoiler-free reviews 15:21 - 22:12
Our Theme discussion: Hope and Despair in "Everything..." And Modern US zeitgeist 22:12 - 1:08:48
Misc Love and nice touches 1:08:48 - 1:16:40
What movies is this like? 1:16:40 - 1:23:02
Outro 1:23:00 - End
Yeah, we're talking about the movie everyone's talking about this week, but only one podcast has our special guest Sergio Mims.
We discuss Nope, Jordan Peele, and Sergio's shock and horror of the Wakanda Forever trailer.
Topics
Intro 00-17:54
Cast Discussion 17:54 - 24:47
Spoiler-free Reviews 24:47 -37:21
Theme discussion: Fame, spectacle, and how to tame it 24:47 - 55:08
There is Black film beyond the Peele 55:08 - 1h:09m
Michael and Dave talk comic con 1h:09m - 1h:11m
Sergio on Wakanda Forever 1h:11m - 1h:25m
Outro 1h:25m - End
Peter Strickland bites the art world with less-gross-than-expected and funny Flux Gourmet.
Timestamps
Intro 00 - 12:41
Is it horror? 12:31 - 15:14
Spoiler-free Reviews 15:14 - 21:59
The Humor of Flux Gourmet 21:59 - 29:54
How Flux Gourmet parodies the elite art world 29:54 - 45:02
Outro 29:54 - End
Timestamps
Start - 05:43 Intro
04:53 - 39:55 Reviews
39:55 - 42:42 History of Dinosaurs in movies
42:42 - End Outro
Directed by
Colin Trevorrow ... (directed by)
Writing and Directing Credits
Emily Carmichael ... (screenplay by) &
Colin Trevorrow ... (screenplay by)
Derek Connolly ... (story by) &
Colin Trevorrow ... (story by)
Michael Crichton ... (based on characters created by)
Cast
Chris Pratt as Owen Grady
Bryce Dallas Howard as Claire Dearing
Laura Dern as Ellie Sattler
Sam Neill as Alan Grant
Jeff Goldblum as Ian Malcolm
DeWanda Wise as Kayla Watts
Mamoudou Athie as Ramsay Cole
Isabella Sermon as Maisie Lockwood
Campbell Scott as Lewis Dodgson
BD Wong as Dr. Henry Wu
Michael and Dave, two men, talk Men, a movie about men written and directed by a man.
Men on IMDB https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13841850/
Men on Rotten Tomatoes https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/men_2022
Times
Intro and synopsis 00:00 - 06:17
Is it horror? 06:17-08:49
Spoiler-free Reviews 08:49-13:56
The Alex Garland cannon rankings 13:56-19:11
Spoiler discussion: The bad men in Men 19:11-36:47
Spoiler discussion: What about the woman in Men? 36:47-44:49
Spoiler discussion: What is up with that (those) ending(s)? 44:49-1:05
Outro 1:05-End
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness brings Sam Raimi back from a nine-year-long directorial slumber. Whether he is alive and kicking or a studio zombie, well, we’ll let you decide. Besides Sam, the movie has a plot with many twists and turns, cameo upon cameo, and maybe enough excitement to deliver a light two-hour entertainment experience.
The boys head down south with some pornographers in a van. We're talking Ti West's fun new horror film X.
“An ambitious carny with a talent for manipulating people with a few well-chosen words hooks up with a female psychiatrist who is even more dangerous than he is.”
Can a room full of dramatic conversation hold your attention? David and Michael agree, but the Oscars do not because they snubbed this superb chamber film.
Michael and Dave are sick, but somehow make it through a discussion of The Lost Daughter and The Sparks Bros.
We are continuing with December weekly, double-film episodes chronicling Award seasons contenders. This week it is Spencer and The Power of the Dog. Michael and Dave have pretty divergent opinions on Spencer but agree The Power of the Dog is one of the year's best.
Michael and Dave try to make sense of the infinitely interesting and bewildering Titane.
Edgar Wright takes us back to London in the '60s via camerawork and smoking. They might not have been all they were cracked up to be.
Dave and Michael both liked the latest from Paul Schrader, and agreed the strongest aspect of the film is the lead character development and the same's portrayal by Oscar Isaac.
DESCRIPTION
Redemption is the long game in Paul Schrader's THE CARD COUNTER. Told with Schrader's trademark cinematic intensity, the revenge thriller tells the story of an ex-military interrogator turned gambler haunted by the ghosts of his past.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11196036/
Candyman is the new film from Nia DaCosta that picks up twenty years post-original. We as lovers of the original awake to a new Chicago, one where only a tiny sliver of Cabrini Green lives on, and the legend of our hooked friend is all but forgotten. Fortunately, artist Anthony (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II) is there to look in the mirror with us and say his name.
Candyman on IMDB
Special Mindframes delivery! The Green Knight will be streaming Thursday on most platforms, so we did an episode. Ralph Ineson will host, and as soon as you finish, you can listen to our out spoiler-filled argument over the ending!
So many words have been used to describe our featured movie this week Annette. Some of these words have included, “bizarre,” “weird” and “Sparks-y,” but what are Sparks and Leos Calax really trying to do here? In this episode, Dave and Michael try and unpack why Annette wants to remind you it’s a movie.
Timestamps
00:00 - 15:00 Intro, cast, and overall recommendations
15:00 - End Spoiler discussion of Pig and loss
Discussion Summary
Although Nick Cage has come to be known for his over-the-top portrayals and eccentric characters, Pig is an understated journey through one man's grief.
After years of living isolated in the woods with only his trusty eponymous pig to keep him company, save a weekly truffles-for-supplies visit from Amir (Alex Wolff), Robb is forced to confront the world and his past after a brazen kidnapping.
Resources
Pig IMDB https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11003218/
Nicolas Cage’s Superman screen test, maybe? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvzpNoTnhV4
Corrections
- Michael meant to say 3000 Miles to Memphis, not 3000 Miles to Vegas.
- Dave meant to say Ghostrider, not Ghosthunter.
In honor of Richard Donner, Michael watched and David revisited the classic THE GOONIES. It's a little messy by kind of works!
Is there a spiritual element in the struggle of Minari's characters to cultivate an unforgiving Arkansas?
Today, Dave and Michael are joined by a very special guest, Chicago’s very own Robert Daniels! Robert and the guys run down their 2020 Top 10 lists and ruminate on the year that very much was.
About our guest
Robert Daniels is a Chicago-based critic and is the founder and editor of 812filmreviews. Robert is a contributor to RogerEbert.com, ThePlaylist, Vulture, Consequence of Sound, Polygon, the New York Times, and many others. He can be found at 812filmreviews.com.
Contents
0 - 3:30 Intro
3:30 - End Top 10 Discussions
The Top 10's
Robert
- "David Byrne's American Utopia"
- "Nomadland"
- "One Night in Miami"
- "First Cow"
- "Night of the Kings"
- "Martin Eden"
- "I'm Thinking of Ending Things"
- "Minari"
- "Lovers Rock"
- "Time"
Dave
- "I’m Thinking of Ending Things"
- "The Invisible Man"
- "Come to Daddy"
- "Bacurau"
- "Possessor"
- "La Llorona"
- "The Deeper You Dig"
- "His House"
- "Scream, Queen! My Nightmare on Elm Street"
Michael*
- Sound of Metal
- Bacurau
- Lovers Rock
- Nomadland
- I’m Thinking of Ending Things
- Education
- David Byrne’s American Utopia
- Red, White and Blue
- Wolfwalkers
-
First Cow
-
So far
Charlie Kaufmann invites you inside a mind-trip of great movie that keeps you interested and guessing.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7939766/
Special guest Jim Laczkowski stops by to talk about the movie everyone is mooooing over FIRST COW. This will not be the only cow pun.
Three generations of women come to terms with aging, family histories, and maybe more in the debut film from Natalie Erika James, Relic.
In honor of the late Ennio Morricone, Michael and Dave travel to Old West, a land of gunslingers, Brooklyn-accented New Mexican bandits, and Clint Eastwood. Just kidding, it's Spain.
We're talking about the 1966 Spaghetti masterpiece THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY, and its equally masterful score. As a bonus, Michael clicks furiously on the world's loudest mouse, and Dave casually eats a bag of chips with his mic unmuted.
We are all set for launch as Dave and Mike give this reflective 2019 Science Fiction film two rockets up.
Starring little known actors Brad Pitt and featuring newcomer Tommy Lee Jones, Ad Astrawas not seen by enough people last year. It may have only grabbed one Oscar nomination (sound editing), but it caught our hosts' attention and hearts with its theme of the peril of certainty.
Deerskin is a French dark comedy that both our hosts loved. Brought to you by murder-tire famed director Quentin Dupieux (2010's Rubber).Drape yourself in the frills of nature and come ride the stag of absurdity with us.
Deerskin on IMDB
Support theaters by watching Deerskin in virtual cinema
https://www.filmlinc.org/films/deerskin/
https://drafthouse.com/virtual-cinema/deerskin
Capital in the Twenty-first Century attempts to recount the history of inequality and capitalism since the Industrial Revolution. That's a lot to chew on, and Michael and David discuss whether it was too much.
From the comfort of their own homes, Dave and Michael review the new The Invisible Man starring Elizabeth Moss, directed by Leigh Whannell. The movie is undoubtedly scary enough but has a lot to say about the consequences when we doubt women.
Dave was so excited to see a deserving heir to the original Invisible Man that he almost wore pants while recording. Michael obsessively played with a coin on his desk, not realizing his computer mic would pick up the noise. Sorry about that.
Time notes
0-10:00 Welcome and Review
10:00-40:00 The History of "Invisible Man" on film
40:00 - End Thematic analysis and consideration of how the movie ends
Links to help Chicago theaters and employees
Support Davis Theater employees
Help the MusicBox by streaming
Gene Siskel stream at home
Michael and Dave review and try and analyze of the multilayered masterpiece Portrait of a Lady on Fire.
Notes
Portrait of a Lady on Fire on IMDB
Check out Broey Deschanel in-depth treatment of the gaze in this film
Dave and Michael discuss the state of all things Oscar in 2020. Hear their predictions and what they think was snubbed in this years slate.
We go through 2019, highlighting the films we regret missing and those we loved.
Links
The movies we talked about
Michael's top 25 of 2019
Adam Sandler is in one of the best movies of the year- and no, they didn't make a Jake and Jill sequel! We're talking of course about Uncut Gems.
A detective investigates the death of a patriarch of an eccentric, combative family.
Written and directed by Rian Johnson.
Starring Daniel Craig, Chris Evans, and Ana de Armas.
Knives Out on IMDB
Knives Out Official Site
Jojo Rabbit has been dividing critics. Although it won the audience choice at TIFF, some feel the lighthearted portrayal of Hitler is in bad taste. Others just find it funny.
IMDB
They both loved the Lighthouse, but Michael could have used a little more guidance into port.
This week we are off to Korea to discuss the failures of capitalism with Bong Joon Ho's Parasite.
Dave and Mike tried to avoid the controversy, but it couldn't be avoided. Oh yeah, we liked it. Art house cool badges will be turned in at the end of the week.
Description
Mike and Dave reconsider Apocalypse Now during its 40th anniversary year.
IMDB
Notes
Michael and Dave talk about Once upon a time ...in Hollywood. The predictable critic hacks they are, they loved it, but did discuss possible misogyny and Tarantino's middle school crush on Old Hollywood.
IMDB
70mm Screenings
Music Box Theatre, Chicago, IL
Alamo Drafthouse New Mission, San Francisco, CA
Arclight Cinemas Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Cineplex Varsity, Toronto, Canada
City Cinemas Village East, New York, NY
Corrections
- “Jefferson Airplane” should be “Paul Revere and the Raiders”
- At no point in this movie does Tarantino’s Bruce Lee don the yellow jumpsuit
Michael and Dave start out the the summer by talking about some classics turning forty. Today it is ALIEN's turn.
We took a (very short) trip to the Chicago Critics Film Festival. We saw....almost everything. Michael swoons over OUR TIME MACHINE and goes against the grain on THE NIGHTINGALE, while Dave rubs salt in his wound for missing LUCE. In Five Minute Bergman WINTER LIGHT is discussed.
On this weeks episode Michael and Dave talk about the fun new documentary HAIL SATAN? which opens 5/3 in Chicago.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9358044/
https://www.hailsatanfilm.com/
A father and his daughter struggle to survive in deep space where they live in isolation.
David and Michael have a fight over how successful the new Claire Denis movie is.
Contents
Spolier free review 00:00 - 05:15
Spoilers 5:15 - End
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT 48:00 - 52:00
Mike and Dave discuss Jordan Peele's highly anticipated second film. No rabbits were harmed in the making of this podcast. Needless to say, we were both big fans.
00 - 3:40 Spoiler-free review
3:40 - 13:30 Spoiler recap
13:30 - 28:30 Performance, music, and Peele love
28:00 Influences roundup
40:30 - end Speculation on the big ideas in US
Free Solo
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7775622/
We get judgy, and although we loved this visually stunning Oscar nominee, we wonder if some more uncomfortable questions should have been asked.
Our movie for discussion this episode is the new World War I documentary They Shall Not Grow Old. We discuss whether Peter Jackson's efforts to use modern technology brought the Great War back to life, or if it left us feeling somewhere between 1914 and Middle Earth.
Also Dave and Michael want to hand out some more Oscar nominations, and maybe take some away in our 2018 snubs and anti-snubs lists. Plus, as part of the new Five Minute Bergman segment, Michael reveals what it was like to finally see the director's 1957 classic The Seventh Seal.
Table of contents
00:00 Non-spoiler discussion of They Shall Not Grow Old
5:30 Spoiler discussion of They Shall Not Grow Old
17:30 Mike and Dave's list of 2018 Oscar snubs and anti-snubs
45:00 Five minute Bergman on The Seventh Seal
Dave and Mike review M. Night Shyamalan's latest in the Unbreakable trilogy, Glass. Also in this episode, our hosts discuss some personal favorites from 2018 that are not Roma.
Glassreview
6:29 Glass spoiler discussion
17:25 The top 10 of 2018 that are not Roma
Happy Holidays!
Michael and Dave go a little off script and talk about a the delightful and fun teen zombie musical!
Dave and Michael talk about Yorgos Lanthimos's latest movie The Favourite. The name is appropriate because it is winning awards left and right. Dave and Michael tried to do more than gush, but this script is so delightful, and the three main actors so divine, it's hard not to love it. We also discussed whether we reccomend other Lanthimos films to a lover of The Favourite.
This movie was adored by Dave and Michael.
In a dystopian version of present-day Oakland, Calif., Cassius Green finds himself in desperate need of a job and becomes a telemarketer at RegalView. But what looks like just another dead-end gig leads Cassius down a bizarre rabbit hole where success depends on sounding white, selling out his friends and co-workers and helping insane CEO Steve Lift enslave the working class.
Official Trailer
Official Site
This weeks recommendations
Tout va bien
Putney Swope (1969)
Moonlight
Get out
Michael and Dave review Eighth Grade, the directorial debut from stand-up comic Bo Burnham and likely oscar contender.
Eighth Grade is the story of Kayla Day, an awkward Eighth Grader who is about to finish middle school and enter high school. The year has been a pretty rough one for Kayla, and despite the faux confidence she shows via videos she posts on the internet (to presumably no one), she remains an isolated and awkward girl. The movie documents the last two weeks of her awful eight grade year as she struggles to navigate adolescence, boys, and modern America.
Dave and Michael both enjoyed the insane antics and motif of what's been called "Nick Cage at his most Nick Cage." This analysis of Panos Cosmato's Mandy contains both a spoiler and non-spoiler discussion.