Sacred Cows and Clean Milk: Recent Episodes
Varun Bhardwaj
This podcast is dedicated to discussing ecological sustainability from the perspective of self-organisation.
This is a podcast made by Notebook LM based on Pratt's (2009) editorial on writing up and reviewing qualitative research.
This is a podcast made by Notebook LM based on Pratt's (2008) paper on publishing and evaluating qualitative research.
This is a podcast made by Notebook LM based on Luoma and Heitanen's (2024) paper on Reflexive Qualitative Research.
This is a podcast made by Notebook LM based on Gehman et al.'s 2017 paper on theory-method fit in qualitative research.
This is a podcast made using Notebook LM based on Leech and Ongwubeezie's 2016 typology of research method designs.
This is a podcast made using Notebook LM based on Turner et al.'s 2015 paper on Triangulatation for Mixed Methods Research
This is a podcast generated by Notebook LM based on Silverman's (1998) paper on the quality of qualitative research in Information System.
This is a podcast generated by Notebook LM based on Edmondson and McManus's (2007) framework of Methodological Fit in Management Research.
This is a podcast made by Notebook LM based on Evered and Louis (1981) insider and outsider research.
This is a podcast generated by Notebook LM based on Cunliffe's (2011) revision of Morgan and Smircich's (1980) typology of qualitative research.
This is a podcast generated by Notebook LM based on Rabetino et al.'s 2021review of the philosophical foundations of strategic management.
This is a podcast generated by Notebook LM based on Burrell and Morgan's (1979) framework on the philosophy of organisation studies.
This is a podcast generated by Notebook LM based on Rowley and Slack (2004) and Fernandez (2019).
This is a podcast generated by Notebook LM in preparation for my interview for the Programme Lead Role at AcademyEX
This is a podcast generated by notebook lm based on information about Frances Valentine.
This is a podcast generated by notebook LM based on the EER of MTF by AcademyEX in 2021
This is a partial reading of chapter 4 of Authoring a PhD by Patrick Dunleavy (2003).
Image by Fritz_the_Cat from Pixabay
This is the second partial reading of chapter 3 from Authoring a PhD by Patrick Dunleavy (2003).
Image by Lennart Demes from Pixabay
This is the first partial reading of chapter three of Authoring a PhD by Patrick Dunleavy (2003)
Image by S. Hermann & F. Richter from Pixabay
This is a partial reading of chapter two of Authoring a PhD by Patrick Dunleavy (2003).
Image by 🎄Merry Christmas 🎄 from Pixabay
This is a partial reading of the Preface and First Chapter of the book Authoring a PhD by Patrick Dunleavy (2003)
Image by Reimund Bertrams from Pixabay
In.this episode, I illustrate my method by going behind the scenes on what happens during the preparation for each episode of this podcast. Image sourced from https://www.jasonsavagephotography.com/tag/andreas-gursky/
In today's episode, I tackle the question of why I don't believe in social science. In yesterday’s episode, I introduced you to eminent philosopher Roy Bhaskar. Today, I draw again from Roy’s book ‘From Science to Emancipation’. I do not believe in the ground on which I stand. It is there. I am standing on it. So why believe in social science?
Image sourced from https://achimkemmerling.wordpress.com/2016/01/15/the-fleshy-reality-we-live-in-why-social-sciences-are-soft-sciences/
In this episode, I argue that social scientists would be wise to admit that although there is the social world in itself, scientists have no way to get at it except through talk. So, should we really be believing in social science? To answer this question, I introduce you to one of the most distinguished philosophers of the twenty first century: Roy Bhaskar.
Image sourced from https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/burned-at-the-stake-for-believing-in-science
If the natural system and the economic components can be explained by a small set of variables and critical processes, why does expert advice so often create crisis and contribute to political gridlock? In this episode, I explain why complex issues connected with the notion of sustainable development are not just ecological problems or economic or social ones but a combination of all three. In order for science to redeem itself, it needs to understand processes spanning metres to tens of thousands of kilo-meters over months and millennia.
Part of the reason why the world has not collapsed is that natural ecological systems have the resilience to experience wide change, and still maintain the integrity of their functions. The other part of the answer lies in human behaviour and creativity. In this episode, I highlight five myths surrounding the relationship between humans and nature. These myths take us on a journey from asking why the world has not yet collapsed to asking what it means to be alive at this time in history.