In Angles, a personal finance podcast, Anglia Advisors founder Simon Brady CFP® and his guests talk about what younger professionals and foreign nationals in the US need to know to successfully getting their personal finances in order and build towards financial security, often by just adjusting your mindset, using new technology or learning to ignore the BS conventional wisdom and myths put out by the financial media & Wall Street.
This podcast is informational only and should not be used as the sole basis for making any investment decision. Opinions expressed are mine or those of my guests.
Following Trump’s latest flip-flop over the weekend as he continued to desperately search in vain for an off-ramp to the highly unpopular war that he started over five months ago, Iran accused him of “psychological warfare”.
An exasperated Wall Street would probably agree. Traders are dancing in the dark. Trying to get a handle on what the plans are, if any, for bringing this conflict (and the resulting energy price volatility) to a suitable and sustainable conclusion is proving impossible and traders are forced to spend their time these days reacting to raging social media posts as well as fantastical press releases and impromptu news conferences that are often jam-packed with utter nonsense and shameless lies.
Oil prices tanked and interest rates eased after Trump’s climbdown from his frenzied apocalyptic threats which had included promises of “decapitation”, offering support for both stocks and bonds which both rallied hard when Wall Street opened on Monday and kept up a positive momentum all day. Big Tech stocks enjoyed a particularly dazzling session with dip-buyers going all-in.
The orgy of tech stock bargain-hunting intensified on Tuesday, boosted by sensational pre-market earnings reports from Palantir and giant AI beneficiary, Caterpillar and the indexes, especially the tech-heavy NASDAQ-100, experienced another fabulous session with the S&P 500 index notching a new all-time record high for the first time since June 2nd.
After the close SpaceX, thus far a total dumpster fire of an investment that has essentially been in free-fall for almost its entire existence as a publicly-traded stock, reported almost half a billion dollars in losses in Q2 and colossal AI spending plans and AMD surprised Wall Street with a weak outlook. Both stocks got slammed.
Trump assured us of a deal with Iran “within hours” , but Wall Street wasn’t going to fall for that again and when markets opened on Wednesday, the dip-buyers took a breather and stocks cooled off despite solid earnings and bright outlooks from heavyweights Eli Lilly and Disney. The indexes all pulled back a bit by the close.
After all of Trump’s bombastic fanfare, for the umpteenth time a promised resolution failed to materialize, indeed in the end the US was not even party to the only announced deal of the day as Iran and Oman agreed on a proposed Strait of Hormuz toll-based shipping route which excludes US and Israeli vessels. 2026’s best-performing stock, Sandisk (up 350%), missed lofty earnings estimates after the bell and got spanked. The effect was felt in Asia where the tech-heavy South Korean market crashed again.
Also on Wall Street’s mind on Thursday was upcoming employment data and the fallout and attempted damage control from the badly-botched start to the reign of Fed chairman Kevin Warsh (see my report from last week and .. AND I QUOTE .. below), including the rather alarming revelation that Trump has been constantly calling him since his appointment. The early-week monster rally continued to run out of steam and, for the second session in a row, the indexes closed fractionally lower.
The Jobs Report on Friday morning was a complicated puzzle, with shockingly negative net job creation in the month of July and wages continuing to lag inflation, but the shrinking overall workforce meant that the unemployment rate actually fell to 4.1%. Bets on a Fed rate hike in September were pared back (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below), so interest rates sank and stocks and bonds bounced on the news with the S&P 500 again returning to all-time record high territory to close out a very solid week, the index’s best five-day showing since April.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
Despite last week’s tech recovery, it is large-cap, high quality, high profitability, value-focused stocks and profitable small caps with free cash flow that are currently "paying" investors to take equity risk from a valuation perspective, while tech-heavy, AI-sensitive, growth-focused names, from loss-making small firms to mega-cap companies, are not really "rewarding risk" right now. The biggest portfolio downside risk clearly lies with the NASDAQ, where there is no real cushion left if the AI spending narrative stumbles again or if the 10-year Treasury yield starts threatening to break through 5.00% again.
Meme stock “investors” who still rely on TikTok and YouTube nonsense for their investment advice continue to hemorrhage money with GameStop last week falling to its lowest level in years.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The really smart people over at Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA) have produced a goldmine of a video outlining financial planning considerations for those in their 20s, 30s and 40s that very much aligns with my own approach.
Definitely worth your time.
Anglia Advisors clients are now able to access customized model portfolios, including from Dimensional Fund Advisors, in managed investment accounts - contact me for more details.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“[Treasury Secretary] Bessent and [Fed chairman] Warsh are a double whammy to global markets that investors can’t ignore.”
Rajeev De Mello at Gama Asset Management, on growing bond market concerns about the recent direction of US central bank policy, Fed independence from political interference and the possible re-emergence of global bond vigilantes.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. It rose 3.5% last week, is higher by 5.1% over the last three months and is up by 14.0% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. It rose 3.1% last week, is higher by 6.4% over the last three months and is up by 23.0% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. It rose 3.0% last week, is higher by 2.5% over the last three months and is up by 16.2% so far this year.
Data shown is total return (including dividends)
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE 3.625%*(unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY 3.87%(3.83% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY 4.19%(4.28% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY 4.35%(4.45% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY *4.65%(4.75% a week ago)
20 YEAR TREASURY 5.20%(5.28% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY 5.19% (5.27% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committeeat periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Moving in lockstep with the Fed Funds interest rate*, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.66%, one month ago: 6.47%, one year ago: 6.63%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on September 16th?
0.25% higher than now .. 43% probability (72% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 57% probability (28% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
With three more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rateof 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 67%, one month ago: 63%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other content published by Anglia Advisors.
Under no circumstances is any such content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Traders were very much on edge all weekend, bracing for a frenetic week with multiple impactful earnings reports, a Fed interest rate-setting meeting, tariffs suddenly front and center again, $100 oil and who knows what from an increasingly erratic Trump.
Conventional wisdom on Wall Street is that US foreign policy and military strategy is now being dictated by the interplay between the oil price and the election calendar and the main reason for Sunday’s pause in US airstrikes was that the “100/4” threshold had been breached again ($100+ oil and $4.00+ at the pump) with the midterms on the horizon and “coincidentally” right before a Fed interest rate decision.
Markets got off to a strong start on Monday with the stock indexes staging an early relief rally as oil prices fell back sharply. But a wobble quickly set in as chip makers got hammered again on growing fears that Chinese AI competition may flood the market with cheaper and more powerful products along with worries about persistent circular financing and the indexes closed essentially unchanged.
The price of Nvidia, the largest component stock in large cap indexes, fell so hard that by lunchtime it was no longer the world’s most valuable company and Apple was top dog again.
The chip rout deepened overnight in Asia as AI greed turned to fear, with the South Korean market crashing by 11%. But solid earnings from the likes of Coca-Cola, Ford, Paypal and Boeing impressed Wall Street on Tuesday and, as the plunge in semiconductor stocks eased moderately, the S&P 500 index drifted slightly higher, while the NASDAQ-100 closed marginally in the red before the baton was passed to a still-jittery Asia.
There was an unusual whiff of intrigue as Fed Day dawned in New York on Wednesday. Going into the 2pm ET announcement, the market probabilities were at 30% for a 0.25% Fed Funds Rate hike and 70% for no change.
As it turned out, the FOMC voted not to change the rate with three dissenting committee members voting for a hike. Chairman Warsh held a babbling, muddled and evasive word salad of a press conference that only amplified concerns that he is in Trump’s pocket. The three dissents indicate the direction of travel and a rate increase at the next meeting on September 16th is still very much on the table (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below).
Warsh’s utter disaster of a performance (see .. AND I QUOTE .. below) poked the bear in the form of bond vigilantes who constantly fear a feeble Fed response to inflation and that was bad news for long term bond investors, variable rate mortgage holders or new home buyers (see AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE below).
While short term interest rates eased, longer term interest rates exploded higher with the 30-year Treasury rate touching more twenty-year highs, breaking through 5.20%. Stocks tumbled, especially the tech-heavy NASDAQ-100 which entered official correction territory after suffering its longest losing streak since the dark days of October 2022. A further escalation and expansion of the Middle East conflict didn’t help. Meta, RobinHood and Qualcomm all disappointed with earnings after the close but Microsoft and Starbucks surprised to the upside.
Wall Street was merciless in its punishment of Meta on Thursday, but rewarded Microsoft by adding half a trillion dollars to its value, a record for a one-day gain in an individual stock. Dip-buyers finally dived back in, scooping up beaten-down tech names in particular (except for Meta), partly triggered by a cooling PCE annual inflation reading of 3.7% and despite an underwhelming annualized Q2 GDP growth estimate of 1.5%.
The indexes all closed substantially higher, enjoying their best day in over a year. Bonds, however, made no such recovery as interest rates stayed stubbornly elevated. Apple’s after-hours earnings were perfectly fine but traders focused on the supply and cost concerns over component parts and memory for its products and the stock price dumped, pushing it back to second place again in the Biggest Company In The World standings after just four days at the top. There were no such reservations about Amazon though, after it blasted through expectations with its report and the stock zoomed higher.
The risk-on euphoria spread to Asia where the indexes bounced back spectacularly from their recent plunges, with South Korea jumping by a record 18%. The bargain-hunting-driven burst of momentum initially carried into New York on Friday and the indexes got off to a fast start helped by predictably decent Q2 earnings from Chevron and Exxon-Mobil. Stocks closed the session higher again, managing to close out a wildly volatile week in the green but still lower for the month of July.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“The financial environment is much more complex now, and it is much easier to make bad decisions” .
Economist and top financial columnist Allison Schrager of Bloomberg asks; why are Americans so financially illiterate?
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Warsh suggested Fed policymakers should follow the bond market rather than lead it, the bond market’s response was to punch him in the face.”
Christian Hoffmann, head of fixed income at Thornburg Investment Management, following Fed chairman Warsh’s credibility issues last week (see above).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. It rose 0.8% last week, is higher by 3.9% over the last three months and is up by 10.1% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. It rose 0.6% last week, is higher by 4.5% over the last three months and is up by 18.8% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. It rose 1.4% last week, is higher by 2.4% over the last three months and is up by 12.8% so far this year.
Data shown is total return (including dividends)
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE 3.625%*(unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY 3.83%(3.85% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY 4.28% (4.18% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY 4.45%(4.28% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY *4.75% (4.55% a week ago)
20 YEAR TREASURY 5.28%(5.07% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY 5.27% (5.06% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committeeat periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Moving in lockstep with the Fed Funds interest rate*, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.58%, one month ago: 6.45%, one year ago: 6.72%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on September 16th?
0.25% higher than now .. 72% probability (82% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 28% probability (18% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
With three more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rateof 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 66%, one month ago: 62%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other content published by Anglia Advisors.
Under no circumstances is any such content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
“Not a drop of oil will leave the Strait of Hormuz”, according to Iran on Sunday as the so-called “three-week skirmish” approached its five-month anniversary amid daily US airstrikes and zero signs of any resolution.
Stock markets around the world are still considerably higher than they were on the day the conflict formally began back on February 28th, but the oil price spiking back through $90 and the average price at the pump in the US over $4.00 again risked making for a miserable start to the week for global stocks, adding to the persistent jitters about AI overspending (funded in many cases by debt).
Asian and European indexes duly had a rough day on Monday but Wall Street was more upbeat with bargain-hunters gently nibbling early on following the previous week’s chip/semiconductor stock carnage, but they were soon beaten back by inflation doomsayers and the US indexes closed a touch lower.
After hours, Trump threatened a 50% tariff on many Canadian goods under obscure legislation dating back to the 1930s, vaguely citing “discriminatory treatment” of US exports, setting up either a completely unnecessary bust-up with a major trading partner or else yet another pointless TACO episode. The smart money is on the latter.
With a brief pause in the toxic Iran war rhetoric, chip stock dip-buying resumed on Tuesday morning and picked up steam as the day wore on and the indexes all closed nicely in the green.
After taking a day off, Trump issued a barrage of more angry social media threats of violence against Iranians on Wednesday and stocks stumbled out of the gate on the back of relentlessly rocketing energy prices and soaring interest rates. But they later recovered on more of the AI tunnel vision which continues to feed the bulls, with more bottom-fishing ahead of the start of tech earnings to record another solidly positive session.
The main event though was right after the close when Alphabet/Google announced respectable earnings but scary AI spending plans and Tesla badly missed profitability expectations despite a bump in EV sales. The reports spooked after-hours traders and both stocks sank.
When Wall Street opened on Thursday, the bond market sent a clear message of inflation concern, selling off hard again as interest rates jumped across the board, including the impactful 10-year Treasury rising to its highest rate in over eighteen months and the 30-year up to a level not seen in almost twenty years (see INTEREST RATES below).
With no help whatsoever from Alphabet/Google or Tesla, both of which got thoroughly brutalized as punishment for their disappointing reports the night before, stock markets completely broke down as oil prices roared back into triple-digits and the week’s index gains were more than wiped out in one horrible session which resulted in the Mag 7 stocks losing a combined $800 billion in value.
After hours, Intel shattered expectations with a blowout Q2 earnings report but Trump continued raising the temperature, announcing a sweeping new set of tariffs on 60 countries representing 99.4% of US imports. Many of its victims are already formulating their retaliation.
Financial markets seemed unsure how to react on Friday, eventually settling for not doing much. Interest rates paused their rocket ride and stocks drifted aimlessly throughout the session, closing unchanged but on edge ahead of geopolitical uncertainty over the weekend and a monster upcoming week with a kind of live Fed interest rate decision on Wednesday and a truckload of earnings reports including from Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Amazon, Qualcomm, Exxon-Mobil, Chevron and many more.
The downside risk for stocks feels greater now than it has been in some time with high valuations, intensifying war, a rebuild of Trump’s highly damaging tariff wall, spiraling interest rates and a worsening inflation outlook, but there is still a world where mega-cap earnings can possibly come to the rescue.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
Until somewhat recently, the market’s view of AI spending was “the bigger, the better” as investors embraced the idea that the more the hyperscalers spent on AI, the more of a windfall they’d eventually receive. However, that’s changing, primarily due to two factors; i) the sheer amount of money being thrown at the limited supply of AI equipment has caused the prices of tech components such as semiconductors or memory to skyrocket and ii) these hyperscalers seem to be caught in an arms race, as spending increases by one elicit a “we’re behind” response from others who react by boosting their own expenditure. Investors don’t want to see spending being slashed (that would be bad for everyone), but nor do they want to see such an enormous acceleration either, because that can end up depressing free cash flow at these firms. “Restraint, please” seems to be the message from Wall Street.
Less than a month ago, oil prices seemed poised to fall into the $60’s. By last week they were back above $100, once again threatening to ignite even higher inflation around the world. The job of global central banks is getting harder and harder when it comes to interest rate-setting decisions and the next such test for the Federal Reserve is on deck for this coming Wednesday (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below).
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
New York City has now slipped to fourth place behind San Francisco, Miami and LA (in that order) in the race for the unwanted crown of the most expensive city to live in America.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“What the market is pricing is a scenario where everything goes right and there are no risks. That is not a bullish picture.”
Sebastian Raedler, Head of European equity strategy, Bank of America
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. It fell 0.8% last week, is higher by 3.3% over the last three months and is up by 8.2% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. It fell 0.8% last week, is higher by 5.3% over the last three months and is up by 18.4% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. It fell 0.1% last week, is higher by 1.0% over the last three months and is up by 10.5% so far this year.
Data shown is total return (including dividends)
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE 3.625%*(unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY 3.96%(3.85% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY 4.33% (4.18% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY 4.43%(4.28% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY *4.69% (4.55% a week ago)
20 YEAR TREASURY 5.18%(5.07% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY 5.16% (5.06% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committeeat periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Moving in lockstep with the Fed Funds interest rate*, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.55%, one month ago: 6.48%, one year ago: 6.74%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on July 29th?
0.25% higher than now .. 38% probability (13% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 62% probability (87% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
With four more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rateof 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 66%, one month ago: 61%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other content published by Anglia Advisors.
Under no circumstances is any such content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The US/Iran ceasefire memorandum is obviously in tatters. Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, prompting a reinstatement of the blockade by Trump who also briefly proposed an idea to create his own toll system to pocket 20% from all shipping traffic (within 24 hours, he was forced to clumsily back-track on this bonkers plan). The US carried out more air strikes, prompting a resumption of Iranian attacks on multiple military targets throughout the region.
Financial markets have not so far priced in any outcome other than the conflict being comfortably in the rear-view mirror very soon. If the certainty behind this conviction were to begin to crumble, there could be an urgent need to reprice risk assets lower and this significant escalation over the weekend drove up energy prices and interest rates and sent overseas stocks reeling on Monday, particularly in the highly volatile South Korean market.
Wall Street took stock prices lower in a more orderly fashion over the course of the session, the decline led by Tech/AI names but without the whiff of panic that was sensed in parts of Asia.
Sky-high expectations means that simply beating Q2 earnings estimates is not necessarily good enough any more and misses are being severely punished. As an example, Citibank and GE’s stock prices fell back despite very solid reports.
On the other hand, IBM was slaughtered on Tuesday after a disappointing report, losing a quarter of its total value after enduring its biggest one-day percentage price dive since “Hey Jude” (which just enjoyed a revival among us recently-devastated English soccer fans) topped the charts in 1968. IBM’s customers are turning away from the 115-year old juggernaut to younger, more nimble AI companies.
However, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Wells Fargo all smashed through estimates by enough to move higher, in some cases to new all-time record highs.
CPI retail inflation for June dropped to 3.50% annualized, reflecting last month’s fall in oil prices. This eased some of the fears about a Fed Funds Rate hike on July 29th (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below) which drove interest rates back down across the board and stocks reacted positively, closing nicely higher.
PPI wholesale inflation data released on Wednesday reinforced the CPI numbers by pulling back from recent highs. Morgan Stanley, BlackRock and Bank of New York joined the ballooning list of financial firms issuing spectacular earnings, helping to somewhat offset market concerns about the chaotically deteriorating geopolitical situation in the Middle East, fueled by increasingly intense threats of violence from Trump. The indexes hugged the flatline all session and closed little changed.
Americans still can’t stop spending as shown by the Retail Sales release on Thursday morning which was the cherry on top of a very strong week of data.
However, the indexes drifted lower again over the course of the day on intensifying chip/AI stock weakness and a growing sense that an increasingly erratic Trump may be losing whatever control he felt he had left over the Iran war and that the market’s previous assumptions about a swift, clean end to the conflict may now need to be recalibrated.
In a weird, rambling address to the nation on Thursday night, Trump made wild and unsubstantiated claims about electoral fraud including directly accusing China of hacking, data theft and interference just a few weeks before his scheduled meeting with Chinese premier Xi in Washington DC. He also found time to include a highly misleading plug for his largely unimpressive Trump Child Accounts.
China remained in focus on Friday with the unveiling of Kimi K3, a potentially serious competitor to the likes of Nvidia, Broadcom, OpenAI, Anthropic and the rest. Asian markets dumped and what had been a selloff in chip/AI names on Wall Street quickly turned into a rout as traders rushed to exit the exact same positions that had driven the major Q2 rally.
This was enough to tip the chipmaker stock index into an official bear market as the NASDAQ got battered, not helped by a disappointing Netflix earnings report and subsequent share price plunge for the major index component. The S&P 500 got off a little more lightly, but still dropped to close near its lows of the day to finish up a losing week.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
It’s time to completely rethink the financial value of home ownership.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Inflation has been too high, for too long and does not appear to be on track all the way back to 2% [the Fed’s official target]. The inflation risks are to the upside.”
Lorie Logan, Dallas Federal Reserve President and FOMC voting member
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. It fell 1.3% last week, is higher by 4.9% over the last three months and is up 9.6% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. It fell 0.5% last week, is higher by 6.9% over the last three months and is up 19.9% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. It fell 1.2% last week, is unchanged over the last three months and is up 11.1% so far this year.
Data shown is total return (including dividends)
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE 3.625%*(unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY 3.85%(3.85% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY 4.18%(4.21% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY 4.28%(4.30% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY *4.55%(4.56% a week ago)
20 YEAR TREASURY 5.07%(5.08% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY 5.06%(5.06% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.49%, one month ago: 6.38%, one year ago: 6.75%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on July 29th?
0.25% higher than now .. 13% probability (34% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 87% probability (66% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
With four more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 66%, one month ago: 57%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other content published by Anglia Advisors.
Under no circumstances is any such content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
After successfully fixing the World Cup over the long weekend, Trump is finding Iran to be far less willing than FIFA to bend to his every whim and certainly not surrendering by any definition of the word, let alone the “unconditional” kind that the US president claims to require at a minimum. The sixty-day deadline countdown continued inexorably with no sign whatsoever of any progress towards a workable and sustainable resolution to the conflict.
Wall Street was still keeping the faith on Monday, however, and its focus was mostly elsewhere. Astonishingly strong Q1 earnings and mostly solid Q2 economic data continue to resonate and stock indexes marched steadily back towards record high levels with traders starting to pile back into the tech trade.
Wild volatility returned to South Korean markets on Tuesday as Samsung (with a 22% weighting in the local KOSPI index) failed to meet high expectations in an interim earnings report and trading circuit breakers were triggered again as the index fell over 8% at one point.
This negatively impacted other Asian markets and then brought Monday’s tech rally in the US to an abrupt halt and all of the indexes closed the session in the red, not helped by more firefights in the Strait of Hormuz and renewed US bombing of Iran which sent oil prices and interest rates spiraling higher.
SpaceX, already down 30% from its post-IPO high, joined the NASDAQ-100 index on Tuesday morning as well as the widely-followed Russell 1000index (and is therefore now a component of the popular QQQ ETF and plenty of other index-tracking funds) and the stock price promptly collapsed by another 7% to below its IPO-day opening price, meaning that anyone who bought the stock and didn’t quickly sell it is now losing money.
The stock market’s almost blind confidence in a swift resolution to the Iran war was shaken on Wednesday as Trump appeared to have a hissy fit while rampaging around the NATO summit in Portugal like a bull in a china shop, calling the Iranians “scum” and “liars” , characterizing peace negotiations as “a waste of time” and declaring the ceasefire to be “over”.
He also began rambling about Greenland again, lashed out at any European he could think of (especially anyone from Spain) and nonsensically blamed Starmer’s recent fall from power on the UK prime minister’s reluctance to join in the apparently “very popular” deadly attack on Iran back in February.
Stocks tumbled at the open as the continuing oil price surge put higher inflation and thereby possible interest rate hikes back in play, but then dip buyers seemed to feel that enough was enough for the time being at least, scooping up many of the battered tech names pulling the indexes back to close barely changed.
There appears to be some appetite for raising the Fed Funds Rate among several voting members of the FOMC, according to the minutes released from its last meeting. Nevertheless, US indexes spent the day drifting steadily northwards all day on Thursday with ongoing bargain-hunting among tech and small cap names in particular and closed nicely higher.
Q2 earnings season kicked off on Friday with Delta Airlines getting things started, but things really ramp up this week with most of the the big banks reporting on Tuesday morning. A record-breaking $27 billion blockbuster US IPO from South Korean memory chip maker SK Hynix was well oversubscribed and the price jumped on day one. The indexes had a relatively quiet session, but continued on an upward glide-path to close the week pretty much where they opened it.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
According to Dimensional Fund Advisors research, i) the average age that a woman is widowed in the US is 59 years old, ii) 72% of women aged 85 or older are widowed, more than double the number of men of the same age at just 35%, iii) US women live 5.6 years longer than US men on average and incur greater healthcare costs over their lifetimes, iv) the average woman in the US earns about 18% less in salary than the average man during their working lives, v)on average, women receive about $5,000 less in annual Social Security retirement benefits than men, vi) two-thirds of women who use a financial/investment professional “feel misunderstood” by their advisor, which is important since only 36% of women are “confident” about their investment knowledge, compared to 59% of men (confidence and competence should not be confused; men and women consistently show equal levels of financial literacy).
The “quick buck” crowd is having a tough time of it lately with crypto’s complete meltdown, gold and silver’s collapse from recent highs and SpaceX’s crumble (see above). Things got worse as 2026’s most talked-about hipster ETF, Roundhill’s memory and digital storage stock fund (DRAM), just crashed 25% in only eight trading days.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The math behind why you need to invest in the broad stock market.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Markets weren’t initially taking the re-escalation in US-Iran tensions too seriously, but today, that seems to have changed.”
Fawad Razaqzada, market analyst at Forex.com on Wednesday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. It rose 0.5% last week, is higher by 10.8% over the last three months and is up 10.4% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. It fell 0.7% last week, is higher by 13.3% over the last three months and is up 20.3% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. It fell 0.3% last week, is higher by 5.0% over the last three months and is up 13.1% so far this year.
Data shown is total return (including dividends)
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY 3.85%(3.82% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY 4.21%(4.14% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY 4.30%(4.23% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY *4.56%(4.49% a week ago)
20 YEAR TREASURY 5.08%(4.99% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY 5.06%(4.98% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.43%, one month ago: 6.50%, one year ago: 6.72%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on July 29th?
0.25% higher than now .. 34% probability (18% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 66% probability (82% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
With four more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 66%, one month ago: 56%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other content published by Anglia Advisors.
Under no circumstances is any such content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The truce between the US and Iran came under severe stress over the weekend with both sides firing on one another and each blaming the other. But there was some geopolitical de-escalation on Monday that pushed stocks higher to start a holiday-shortened week, despite interest rates climbing steeply on the back of ongoing Fed rate hike fears.
There was a flurry of Supreme Court decisions, including upholding the concept of birthright citizenship, confirming the US president as an adjudicated sex offender, opening the door to unconstrained electoral spending by political parties and - more importantly for Wall Street - restricting presidential ability to fire Federal Reserve officials on a whim, somewhat calming recent growing fears about central bank independence.
Tech bargain-hunters dipped their toes back into the water and the major indexes snapped their five-day losing streak with some solid gains.
The month, the quarter and the first half of 2026 came to a close on Tuesday with oil prices dipping below $70 and stocks continuing their reboundfrom the difficult previous week, led by more Big Tech/AI buying.
It can be difficult to trust pricing around key calendar dates like this because of fund manager window dressing, but what is not in doubt is that we had just experienced the best quarter for the S&P 500 (up by 15%) since the big COVID bounce of 2020 and the NASDAQ’s second-best quarter (up 21% despite a record volume one-day fall just last month) since its recovery from the dot-com crash of 2001.
See my Q2 Market Review
That said, financial markets are now entering what historically risks being the poorest-performing quarter of the year, even though markets do still rise about two-thirds of the time in Q3, including last year which saw a 7.5% jump in the S&P 500.
July, Q3 and H2 kicked off on Wednesday with a snoozer. Attention was mostly focused on readying for the employment data the next day. The indexes all lost a bit of ground, even though a lot more S&P 500 stocks rose than fell over the course of the session.
Another bout of chip stock selling put Asian stocks on the back foot on Thursday. The latest pre-market US Jobs Report was generally a disappointment with considerably lower job creation than expected last month and downward revisions to previous data, although the unemployment rate fell slightly to 4.2% as the size of the entire labor force contracted.
Wall Street liked the idea of the Fed having a bit of breathing room when it comes to maybe having to raise the Fed Funds Rate and interest rates eased back from their early week spike as traders pared back on bets on any imminent hike (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below).
Stocks initially moved higher but then fell back again on renewed tech weakness. Volume was muted ahead of the long holiday weekend and the indexes ended the day little changed, but mostly higher for the shortened week.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
By many measures we just entered the eighth longest bull market in stocks since the Second World War at just over three and a half years. Of the previous seven, the average total length is around seven years with the shortest being about five years. We may have a way to go ..
According to the Federal Reserve, the top 20% of earners now account for 58% of all personal spending in the US, the highest proportion on record. Consequently, the bottom 80% of earners account for just 42%, the lowest on record. To put this into perspective, in the 1990s these groups accounted for roughly equal proportions of total personal spending at around 50% each. The K is getting steeper.
Iran is becoming more and more vocal about its intent to monetize the Strait of Hormuz using a toll system whenever it properly reopens, something it only figured out how to do after being attacked by the US. This is raising the stakes and adding complication when it comes to negotiations.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“All sorts of crazy economic ideas are being taken seriously lately.” Bloomberg’s brilliant Allison Schrager bemoans the dubious idea of AI and government hooking up.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Those numbers are too high.”
Tom Barkin, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and voting member of the Federal Reserve rate setting committee, referring to US inflation data. The Fed traditionally combats growing inflation by raising interest rates.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. It rose 1.7%% last week, is higher by 13.9% over the last three months and is up 9.8% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. It fell 0.1% last week, is higher by 18.7% over the last three months and is up 21.4% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. It rose 0.1% last week, is higher by 10.0% over the last three months and is up 13.1% so far this year.
Data shown is total return (including dividends)
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY 3.82% (3.83% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY 4.14%(4.08% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY 4.23%(4.12% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY *4.49%(4.38% a week ago)
20 YEAR TREASURY 4.99%(4.87% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY 4.98%(4.87% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.49%, one month ago: 6.49%, one year ago: 6.67%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on July 29th?
0.25% higher than now .. 18% probability (30% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 82% probability (70% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
With four more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 64%, one month ago: 53%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other content published by Anglia Advisors.
Under no circumstances is any such content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Over the weekend, we were treated to the bizarre sight of the US and Iran delegations chummily sitting down together in Switzerland against a backdrop of the Strait of Hormuz being closed again after being sort of open for all of two days, Israel continuing its deadly assault on Lebanon and Trump again taking to social media to threaten more and more violence.
By the time US markets opened on Monday, UK prime minister Starmer had resigned and Andy Burnham will become the country’s sixth leader in seven years next month after a weeks-long, slow-moving political coup. Initially at least, local financial markets appeared to be taking it in stride.
The US indexes drifted lower in a vacuum of any credible US/Iran news beyond the endless tiresome spin from both sides, dragged down by profit-taking mainly in Big Tech/AI names including a rout of SpaceX, now down over 27% from its post-IPO high, having shed over $600 billion in value and reduced Musk from a trillionaire to a mere billionaire.
Asian stocks crashed on Tuesday with trading halted by circuit-breakers in South Korea in the midst of a 10% plunge on a wave of selling of chip stocks, which spilled into Europe and the US on renewed fears that all this AI buildout is simply costing too much money amidst far-from-certain customer demand and could have resulted in over-valuation of many names including on Wall Street where the NASDAQ-100 tumbled by well over 3%.
Things calmed down in Asia on Wednesday and there was an initial hard rebound when markets opened in New York as dip-buyers waded back in looking for bargains after Tuesday’s global chip-wreck, but they quickly withdrew as tech worries set in again and the indexes closed a touch lower for the session.
With exquisite timing, chip/memory giant Micron, considered by many to be the new Nvidia, reported earnings after hours in a jittery environment and crushed all the analyst estimates. The stock soared in the after-market.
This looked like it was just the boost that the stalled-out rally needed and US tech stocks came roaring out of the gate on Thursday, but once again doubts crept in later in the day after Apple and Microsoft were heavily punished following announcements of sweeping product price increases, OpenAI apparently considering a postponement of its IPO due to turbulent tech market conditions and reported firefights in the Strait of Hormuz.
PCE inflation came in as expected at 4.1%, its highest level for over three years and more than double the Fed’s 2.0% target (which it hasn’t met for more than five years). Stocks closed slightly lower on the day.
Following more tough sessions in Japan and South Korea, the US indexes went nowhere on Friday, essentially hugging the flatline all session but did complete a fifth straight day in the red for the first time this year, closing out a disappointing week but one that could definitely have been a lot worse.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
The best-performing stock of the so-called Magnificent Seventhis year (Alphabet/Google) doesn’t even make the list of the 200 top-performing stocks of 2026. The AI investment cycle is maturing to a stage that is increasingly sensitive to more traditional equity market fundamentals and standards and the last few years’ outperformance of the Mag 7 could be coming to its inevitable end.
Gold and crypto both continue to disappoint their ever-dwindling armies of retail super-fans and prices crapped out again last week with Bitcoin in tatters, dipping below $59k and now worth less than half what it was just nine months ago. The “quick buck” crowd are turning their limited attention span to other outlets; prediction markets, sports betting and zero-day options contracts, for example, to feed their depravity and are pulling assets from their gold and crypto holdings to plough into these shiny new toys.
Oil prices have now round-tripped to where they were on the eve of the war. The same cannot be said of shorter term interest rates. On February 27th, the two-year Treasury rate was 3.38%. Last week it touched 4.24% before pulling back. That’s a major and sustained shift and reflective of a significant change in the outlook for where the Fed Funds Rate is heading (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below).
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
How big should your emergency fund be? It’s not just a math question.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“The number-one job of the hedge-fund manager is not to make sure that you can retire with a smile on your face - it's for him to retire with a smile on his face.”
Mark Cuban
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. It fell 2.1% last week, is higher by 15.3% over the last three months and is up 7.5% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. It rose 1.3% last week, is higher by 19.0% over the last three months and is up 22.3% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. It fell 2.5% last week, is higher by 13.6% over the last three months and is up 12.6% so far this year.
Data shown is total return (including dividends)
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY 3.83% (3.83% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY 4.08%(4.19% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY 4.12%(4.23% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY *4.38%(4.46% a week ago)
20 YEAR TREASURY 4.87%(4.91% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY 4.87%(4.90% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.47%, one month ago: 6.52%, one year ago: 6.77%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on July 29th?
0.25% higher than now .. 30% probability (38% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 70% probability (62% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
With four more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 58%, one month ago: 53%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other content published by Anglia Advisors.
Under no circumstances is any such content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
A 60-day extension of the ceasefire, a conditional reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and a suspension of the US blockade was announced on Sunday but it seems nothing has been resolved when it comes to Iran’s nuclear program, its frozen assets, war reparations or the lifting of sanctions, which would all be the subject of “further discussions” over the coming months.
Despite lots of missing detail and contradictory interpretations from both sides each desperate to claim victory to their domestic audiences, financial markets breathed a sigh of relief on Monday,sending oil prices spinning to three-month lows and stocks exploding higher to start a holiday-shortened week of central bank interest rate decisions around the world, including from the US Federal Reserve on Wednesday.
Traders decided that the many nagging doubts about the limitations and viability of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) could wait for another day and the US indexes had their best session since April, even though only about half the names in the S&P 500 actually moved higher with tech stocks doing most of the heavy lifting.
Overnight, the Japanese central bank hiked local interest rates to 1.00%, astonishingly its highest level since the original Toy Story came out in 1995, but Wall Street took a breather on Tuesday giving back some of Monday’s blistering rally. Some skepticism started to creep in about the still-unclear finer details of the US/Iran deal that Trump described as “not final”, but attention quickly turned to the FOMC.
Fed Day opened on Wednesday with a consumer read from Retail Sales data which blew through expectations, indicating that Americans are still unable to stop shopping. Under newly-minted Fed chairman Kevin Warsh, the committee held the Fed Funds Rate unchanged as expected but it seems from the quarterly Dot Plot that many members now expect to be raising it before year-end in response to the growing specter of inflation fueled by tariffs and war.
Warsh said he didn’t care about financial market reaction to his comments, which is just as well since Wall Street read the tealeaves and decided to aggressively sell stocks and drive shorter term interest rates higher. All of Monday’s solid gains were erased.
The US/Iran MOU, which became less and less impressive the more we learned about it (see below), was signed on Wednesday evening. Now the real work begins, getting the important stuff agreed upon in the next sixty days and return to a fully functioning and toll-free Strait of Hormuz as soon as possible. There’s plenty of banana skin potential between here and there.
Overnight, the Bank of England left UK interest rates unchanged. After two days of US index declines, dip-buyers stormed back in a big way on Thursday, which was a synthetic Friday with US markets closed the next day.
Oil prices continued to retreat and interest rates eased back from Wednesday’s Fed-induced spike. Big Tech/AI led a strong recovery with the NASDAQ setting a new all-time daily volume record and the US indexes finished the trading week nicely in the green.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
Trump sought to break Iran’s regime in weeks. Months later and at a cost of billions of taxpayer dollars and thousands of lives, he seems to have now settled for conditionally reopening the Strait of Hormuz (which was fully open on February 27th). Iranian officials quickly and easily figured out that Trump has no desire to extend the conflict that he started but which is seriously damaging him domestically and they negotiated accordingly.
The US president has been forced into agreeing to little more than a high value pause which has broken almost all of his supposed red lines and signed in Versailles of all places! It’s not even close to the victory that he will falsely but inevitably claim.
From Wall Street’s perspective, what matters is that oil prices head back towards where they were before the war and that the inflationary pressures brought about by the conflict ease, because if inflation metrics continue to heat up, fears of interest rate hikes will rise and that’s a potential threat to the three-and-a-half year rally in stocks.
US oil reserves are at their lowest levels since 1983. This means that the stakes are high when it comes to the upcoming negotiations between the US and Iran because if things unravel (and there were already plenty of signs of strain and backtracking just on day one, not to mention Israel going straight back to bombing Lebanon within hours of the MOU being signed), there is very little breathing room before US consumers and businesses really start to feel the pinch.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Whenever Barry Ritholtz tells us what he’s thinking about, we should all listen and learn.
I know I do.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Almost uniquely in the field of investing, doing nothing can be incredibly powerful, not lazy or negligent. Far too much value is placed on being active and the industry perpetuates that for its own gain.”
Morgan Housel, author and partner at Collaborative Fund
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. It rose 0.9% last week, is higher by 15.1% over the last three months and is up 9.8% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. It rose 0.9% last week, is higher by 19.0% over the last three months and is up 22.3% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. It rose 1.3% last week, is higher by 16.1% over the last three months and is up 15.1% so far this year.
Data shown is total return (including dividends)
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY 3.83%(3.78% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY 4.19%(4.09% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY 4.23%(4.21% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY *4.46%(4.48% a week ago)
20 YEAR TREASURY 4.91%(4.98% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY 4.90%(4.97% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.52%, one month ago: 6.48%, one year ago: 6.81%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on July 29th?
0.25% higher than now .. 38% probability (8% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 62% probability (90% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 0% probability (2% a week ago)
With four more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 61%, one month ago: 51%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other content published by Anglia Advisors.
Under no circumstances is any such content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Alive and well, the US/Iran war, which we were told would last about four weeks, entered its 100th day over the weekend despite weeks of multiple fake reports of its demise and a Trump declaration back on April 17th that the Strait of Hormuz had re-opened (still waiting for that one). The odds of a swift resolution lengthened further as Iran and Israel exchanged fire on Sunday for the first time since early April and oil prices predictably spiked in response.
Traders in Asia picked up where their Wall Street brethren had left off the previous Friday by furiously offloading tech stocks on Monday, but there was a solid bounce in New York as dip buyers swarmed in to scoop up bargains from the tech wreckage ahead of Wednesday’s final set of inflation data before the next Federal Reserve rate-setting meeting on June 17th.
After hours, OpenAI joined Anthropic and SpaceX in confirming an imminent IPO, while at the same time reports began to emerge of the US government possibly taking a taxpayer-funded stake in the company.
Stocks continued higher on Tuesday morning as oil prices and interest rates eased. The dip-buying frenzy quickly faded however as concerns re-emerged about the lofty valuations of some of the Big Tech/AI names, particularly those that had spiked over the last couple of weeks and sparked another orgy of tech selling, further fueled by news that Iran had downed a US military helicopter and also a sense that institutional investors were unloading some of their tech holdings in order to free up funds to buy SpaceX stock on Friday.
But the dip-buyers stepped back in after lunch to stop the bleeding and the indexes eventually closed a wildly volatile day only moderately lower.
The US launched fresh attacks on Iran in response to the helicopter incident and Trump’s increasingly rambling rhetoric got more threatening, but there is clearly headline fatigue on Wall Street right now. The main business of the day on Wednesday was the May CPI data which showed inflation soaring to 4.2%, up a full half a percent from the previous month. The last time CPI was above 4% was in 2023 when the Federal Reserve was in a cycle of raising the Fed Funds Rate up to 5.325%. It’s currently 3.625%. The idea of any upcoming rate cuts now looks highly fanciful.
The spicy inflation print sent stocks nosediving again with tech names once more leading the charge lower. This time the dip-buyers were conspicuous by their absence. After hours, Oracle disappointed with an underwhelming earnings report and traders dumped the stock.
Thursday was the final ever day of a stock market without SpaceX in it (see ARTICLE OF THE WEEK below). The European Central Bank (ECB) raised local interest rates and the May PPI report showed that wholesale inflation in the US rose by the most since the dark days of 2022 and is now running hot at 6.5%.
The chaotic TACO rollercoaster kicked back in with Trump promising hellfire in the morning but by lunchtime had abruptly called off air strikes and told us for the umpteenth time that a peace deal is basically done and will be signed in days. Oil prices and interest rates fell and the bulls jumped back in the driving seat as traders chose to interpret all this rather positively.
The biggest IPO in history by a factor of three landed on Friday with SpaceX’s initial price of $135 valuing the firm at ~$1.8 trillion which instantly made it one of the top ten largest companies in the world. The price ended the session at a little over $160 and the indexes made more gains to close the week in the green on a cautiously growing hope that maybe, just maybe, this time some kind of war resolution might possibly be for real.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE(S) OF THE WEEK ..
Lots of chatter last week about some (but not all) of the indexes changing their policies to accommodate swift inclusion of SpaceX stock and likely Anthropic and OpenAI as well and thereby impose often unwanted ownership upon retail investors in their investment and retirement accounts.
Two insightful articles from Nick Maggiulli and Callie Cox of Ritholtz Wealth Management cut through the noise on where we stand on this and what it could really mean for your investments.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“At $135 a share, you have to believe everything will work fantastically, things that have never, ever happened before … you’re betting that the business exists already.”
Cory Johnson, Epistrophy Capital Research chief market strategist on the SpaceX IPO
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. It rose 0.7% last week, is higher by 12.1% over the last three months and is up 9.1% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. It rose 2.7% last week, is higher by 19.0% over the last three months and is up 19.2% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. It rose 4.7% last week, is higher by 11.8% over the last three months and is up 13.7% so far this year.
Data shown is total return (including dividends)
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY 3.78% (3.78% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY 4.09%(4.17% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY 4.21%(4.29% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY *4.48%(4.55% a week ago)
20 YEAR TREASURY 4.98%(5.03% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY 4.97%(5.01% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.48%, one month ago: 6.37%, one year ago: 6.84%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on June 17th?
0.25% higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 99% probability (96% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 1% probability (4% a week ago)
With five more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 58%, one month ago: 50%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other content published by Anglia Advisors.
Under no circumstances is any such content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Following another weekend of zero trustworthy information on the war and peace front, financial markets were hoping to be able to focus their attention for a few days on the more tangible reality of earnings, economic data and evolving narratives surrounding interest rates and AI etc. as a banger of a month of May for stocks gave way to the final month of Q2 on Monday.
Energy traders ignored Trump’s advice to just“sit back and relax” and pushed the oil price back up above $90 after Iran announced that it was breaking off ceasefire negotiations with the US until Israel halted its deadly attacks in Gaza and Lebanon.
This created something of a speed-bump to the recent furious stock rally and the indexes closed barely changed but still fractionally higher enough for an eighth straight day in the green.
On Tuesday, Marvell (on a deal with Nvidia) and Hewlett Packard (on impressive earnings) became the latest tech stocks to explode higher. The indexes only inched up a little but still enough for new all-time highs for a fifth session running. For the S&P 500 index, it was the 14th record high of the year and the 20th for the NASDAQ.
Overnight into Wednesday, Trump declared negotiations with Iran to be “very boring” and implied that the Strait of Hormuz might not open before Labor Day which, along with more exchanges of fire in the region, kept the upward pressure on oil prices. Trump also decided that this would be a good time to revisit his dormant tariff policy, claiming to somehow suddenly care about international child labor laws as a pretext.
Stocks at last succumbed to the negativity and the indexes’ nine-day winning streak finally came to an end as stocks pulled back from their record levels early on and this time never recovered.
Wall Street’s worries spilled into Asian and European markets overnight with increasing concern about the consequences of Trump’s continued inability to bring to an end the war he started and his apparent loss of control and influence over Israel and Russia, third-party geopolitical actors who have both been intensifying their attacks on civilians.
Index heavyweight Broadcom bucked the trend with a poor earnings report and the stock (which had risen 38% since early April) was brutally punished when New York opened on Thursday.
Since Broadcom is the fifth highest constituent of the S&P 500 index and the fourth biggest in the NASDAQ, this put a lid on a broad market advance and the indexes closed little changed with signs of an investor rotation out of the Big Tech/AI stocks and into more old school names, as evidenced by the stupid dinosaur Dow Jones Industrial Average index reaching a new all-time record high while the NASDAQ tumbled.
The May Jobs Report dropped on Friday morning and showed a massive upside surprise in new payrolls although the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3%. Average wages continue to fail to keep up with inflation. Interest rates soared and stocks dumped in response as financial markets reacted by fully pricing in a 0.25% Fed Funds Rate increase before year-end (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below).
Things quickly snowballed into a full-blown tech wreck with a rush to the exits on fears of over-valuation in certain names, resulting in the indexes’ first weekly losses since March.
Interestingly, although the S&P 500 index plummeted by 2.7% on the day, less than half the stocks in the index moved lower at all, emphasizing the highly selective nature of the aggressive selling, which was heavily concentrated in large tech and AI stocks.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
There has been a subtle shift in Wall Street’s approach to the war. Fed up with having its chain yanked by endless gaslighting nonsense and confused false messaging about an imaginary peace deal that quite obviously doesn’t exist and the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve on pace to hit its lowest level since the early 1980s later this month, traders are now focusing on “Tank Bottom”. This is actual inventory data which suggests that, absent a deal to properly open the Strait of Hormuz soon, severe shortages of energy supplies (especially diesel) will start to noticeably hit US consumers and businesses hard as early as August.
Crypto has utterly failed to participate in the recent risk-on environment, to put it mildly. Indeed, the price of Bitcoin plunged yet again last week to its lowest level since 2024. Over the last year as of Friday’s close, Bitcoin has fallen by 42% while the S&P 500 index has risen 26%, largely driven by AI. That’s a massive discrepancy for investors to handle and there has been some very significant institutional liquidation of crypto holdings and meaningful net outflows from crypto ETFs, demonstrating a clear shift in sentiment. There’s a certain irony in the fact that crypto is essentially being kept in its box by AI.
All of the gains in the gold price since the end of last year have now been erased as it went negative for 2026 last week. The many investors who hopped on the bandwagon in late 2025 after falling for the media hype and the pervasive but false myth that precious metals are a good inflation hedge are now most likely nursing losses on their gold position and also missed out on stock market gains as an additional opportunity cost.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Misunderstanding the increasingly blurred line between investing and gambling can severely endanger your financial security. An important article from the wonderful Liz Ann Sonders.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Being force-fed shares of SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI [in their investment and retirement accounts] may be a bitter pill to swallow for the many, many Americans who are not at all excited about artificial intelligence. In April, a Gallup poll showed just 18% of people ages 14 to 29 feel hopeful about AI, down from 27% in 2025.”
Bess Levin, New York Magazine
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. It fell 2.7% last week, is higher by 10.0% over the last three months and is up 8.6% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. It fell 3.6% last week, is higher by 11.3% over the last three months and is up 12.5% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. It fell 3.6% last week, is higher by 6.6% over the last three months and is up 10.2% so far this year.
Data shown is total return (including dividends)
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY 3.78%(3.69% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY 4.17%(3.98% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY 4.29%(4.13% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY *4.55%(4.45% a week ago)
20 YEAR TREASURY 5.03%(4.98% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY 5.01%(4.99% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.53%, one month ago: 6.37%, one year ago: 6.85%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on June 17th?
0.25% higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 96% probability (99% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 4% probability (1% a week ago)
With five more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 55%, one month ago: 50%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other content published by Anglia Advisors.
Under no circumstances is any such content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Trump and Rubio spent last Saturday teasing that a US/Iran agreement including a re-opening of the Strait of Hormuz was “95% done” and was hours away from being finally announced. Iran quickly denied that anything was imminent and indeed there was nothing substantial to report by the time Asian and European markets opened on Monday, which was a holiday in the US and a number of other countries. Nevertheless, oil prices tumbled and overseas stocks moved higher on the prospect of an end to the conflict.
There was still nothing to report by the time US traders returned to their posts on Tuesday morning. Indeed, Trump had actually ordered renewed air strikes overnight and Israel resumed its assault on civilian targets in both Gaza and Lebanon, all of which stalled gains in Asian and European stock markets.
US stocks initially surged with Big Tech and small caps once again leading the charge and interest rates dived as Wall Street got its first chance to react to the possible progress, taking its cues from still-falling energy prices. Enthusiasm waned as the session wore on, however, with more non-stop war blather but precious little evidence of any deal. The indexes still managed to finish in the green, though.
There were yet more claims and counter-claims of an accord as well as a fountain of confusing rhetoric on Wednesday (including a head-scratching threat from Trump to “blow up” US ally Oman), but jaded traders were tuning it out, viewing the US administration as a bit like the teacher in a Charlie Brown cartoon and finally appear to be stubbornly refusing to engage with all the nonsense in the absence of anything tangible or even vaguely accurate to digest. Stocks inched just a little higher but by enough (you guessed it) to set new all-time records for the major indexes.
The US launched more air strikes overnight into Thursday sending energy prices spinning higher again. Premarket data drops included the latest GDP estimate showing a slightly disappointing 1.6% growth rate and PCE annualized inflation holding steady as expected at 3.8%.
Solid earnings from Best Buy and Dollar Tree indicated that, while Americans are extremely pissed off right now according to record low consumer sentiment data, they just can’t stop spending money. Mostly due to simply following the path of least resistance, stocks drifted higher without too much conviction to complete a sixth straight day of gains and move deeper into record high territory.
The party continued into the last trading day of the month on Friday, fueled in part by Dell whose stock price exploded higher by 33% at the open after blowout earnings and outlook. Despite some late profit-taking, the winning streak for the major indexes remained intact to get to seven straight days with three sessions in a row each resulting in new all-time record highs.
The S&P 500 closed up 6.2% for the month of May and scored its ninth straight week of gains while the NASDAQ completed its best-performing two-month spell since the original Tobey Maguire Spiderman movie was in cinemas back in 2002.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
The Strait of Hormuz has been closed for three months now. Over that time the S&P 500 is up ~10% and the NASDAQ by ~20%. Stocks are being driven bya tug-of-war between geopolitics, oil prices, interest rates and a powerful earnings and AI narrative, but all with a highly asymmetric “glass is half full”bias, leading to a current market environment where good news is great news, no news is good news and even bad news is kind of okay.
The face-ripping run of Micron, with the stock price up over 850% in the last year and doubling in value in just 48 days to above a trillion dollar valuation, is helping to pull the tech sector back to a position of dominance. Of the eleven sectors in the S&P 500, Technology is the only one outperforming the index since the recovery from the lows of early April. This lack of breadth to the most recent rally can be looked at in two ways:
With concern - as the gains are highly concentrated and a nasty turn in the sector or even in just a few names would badly impact the indexes
With relish - at the prospect of the rest of the sectors catching up with the index’s spectacular tech leadership.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Homeowners’ insurance premiums and deductibles are soaring all over the country. The insurance companies tell us that their policies provide financial peace of mind, but almost half the time they will refuse to pay out on your claim.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Stocks are priced for perfection in an imperfect world.”
Emily Roland, JH Investment Management co-chief investment strategist
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 0.7% last week, is higher by 10.6% over the last three months and is up 11.2% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 0.6% last week, is higher by 11.3% over the last three months and is up 18.2% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 0.5% last week, is higher by 2.8% over the last three months and is up 14.2% so far this year.
Data shown is total return (including dividends)
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY 3.69%(3.68% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY 3.98%(4.13% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY 4.13% (4.27% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY *4.45%(4.56% a week ago)
20 YEAR TREASURY 4.98% (5.06% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY 4.99%(5.07% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.51%, one month ago: 6.29%, one year ago: 6.89%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on June 17th?
0.25% higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 99% probability (99% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 1% probability (1% a week ago)
With five more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 57%, one month ago: 50%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other content published by Anglia Advisors.
Under no circumstances is any such content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Another weekend, another complete lack of progress or even any useful information related to the Iran war as the paralysis continued with both sides wasting everybody’s time and effort by offering up proposals that are clearly non-starters since they know full well the other side won’t accept them.
Wall Street loves itself a corny acronym and while bulls are tending to still hold on to the long-standing principle of TACO, many of the bears are adopting NACHO (Not A Chance Hormuz Opens).
All we really got was Trump barking that “the clock is ticking”. No st, thought Wall Street traders who had been promised an end to all this uncertainty weeks ago. With inflation fire alarms starting to go off all over the world, markets made a cautious start to the week on Monday**.
After Japanese interest rates were driven to the highest levels in history overnight, stock prices dipped in New York, led lower by recently-buoyant Big Tech names, with energy prices and US interest rates continuing to head north on slowly evaporating confidence in an imminent workable US/Iran pact.
Oil prices eased slightly late on as Trump implausibly announced that he had been talked out of resuming military strikes on Iran by Gulf allies pending some kind of unspecified deal, but Wall Street shrugged this off on Tuesday as just another tiresome and transparent negotiating ploy.
The first of the week’s impactful earnings reports came out with Home Depot disappointing. The indexes retreated further, again tech-fueled, with stock traders nervously eyeing the one-way traffic in bond markets that was sending longer term interest rates to highs not seen since Soulja Boy topped the Billboard charts.
Wall Street got another read on the American consumer with Target, TJ Maxx and Lowe’s earnings on Wednesday morning all beating estimates. There was nothing in the released minutes from the latest Fed meeting that indicated an imminent Fed Funds Rate cut, but they don’t seem to be overtly plotting a hike either, although the most commonly-expected next Fed move in 2026 has now flipped over from doing nothing to actually raising rates (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below).
Stocks chose to take encouragement from the continued positive earnings environment and the indexes moved nicely higher, erasing the losses of the previous two days as oil prices drifted lower. Bonds had a much better session as interest rates pulled back from their recent highs. Nvidia’s earnings after the bell were perfectly good but lacked a wow factor and the stock did little in the after-market.
On Thursday, Walmart’s pre-market earnings, considered a good barometer of the state of lower-and-middle income consumers and the K-shaped economy, showed significant profit margin compression and the stock sank.
Combined with a muted reaction to Nvidia’s numbers and the continued endless foot-dragging and more unruly rhetoric from both sides of the Iran war spiking energy prices again, this sent the indexes slipping back into the red early on, but a late bout of dip-buying dragged them back up to close lightly in the green.
Stocks completed their eighth consecutive week of gains on Friday, the longest such streak for three years, as longer term interest rates and energy prices continued to recede on the hopes of some kind of a US/Iran settlement ticked a little higher based on still-hazy but slightly more upbeat pronouncements from both sides.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
For AI-driven stock market growth to be sustainable the biggest tech companies will need to see a positive return on their colossal data center spending. If this fails to materialize because people and companies don’t use AI as much as expected or pay for its use, then the so-called hyper-scalers (Meta, Amazon, Oracle, Microsoft, Google etc.) will have to cut spending on them and that could badly damage the rest of the tech sector and thereby the tech-heavy US indexes. We won’t find out that out in the near term, but stock markets are currently acting like the answer can only be “yes, the spending will continue come what may,” and I’m not yet 100% convinced that’s definitely true beyond the next few quarters.
Trump’s job approval rating is cratering, consumer sentiment is at a horrendous multi-decade record low (even Republican voters are fuming) and inflation expectations are through the roof, just a few months before the midterms as Americans go into the Memorial Day long weekend with average gas prices above $4.50 a gallon, having spent an extra $20 billion at the pump in the last twelve weeks as a direct result of the Iran war. It is all this as much as anything else that might bring the conflict to some kind of a resolution relatively soon.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Evidence of a ferocious backlash against AI, especially among young people, is everywhere”. College grads just aren’t having it.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“It’s not cost cutting; it’s replacing in some cases lower-value human capital with the financial capital and the investment capital we’re putting in.”
Bill Winters, CEO of Standard Chartered Bank, was widely slammed for this clumsy quote last week, describing the bank’s employees as “lower-value human capital”.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.0% last week, is higher by 4.2% over the last three months and is up 5.7% so far this year.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 2.9% last week, is higher by 7.4% over the last three months and is up 13.2% so far this year.
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.4% last week, is higher by 4.1% over the last three months and is up 10.1% so far this year.
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.68% (3.69% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.13% (4.09% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.27% (4.26% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.56% (4.59% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 5.06% (5.14% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 5.07% (5.12% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.36%, one month ago: 6.24%, one year ago: 6.86%
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on June 17th?
0.25% higher than now .. ⬌ 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. ⬌ 99% probability (99% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬌ 1% probability (1% a week ago)
With five more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 51%, one month ago: 50%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Trump decided over the weekend that he“didn’t like” Iran’s response to the US proposal to end the conflict but yet again there was little of substance regarding the war for Wall Street to focus on, with markets continuing to view the situation as slowly trending towards some kind of ceasefire.
The Strait of Hormuz has been closed for ten weeks now with no prospect of reopening, a once-unthinkable shock to the world economy and yet the oil price came into the week still well below the high of $140 seen in 2022 (Russia/Ukraine) and global stocks at all-time highs.
US stocks hovered around those highs at the open on Monday with Trump describing the current pause in Middle East hostilities as being “on life support” and continued rising energy prices keeping a lid on the recent melt-up, but the indexes still managed to inch forward a touch. Hence, more new all-time record levels.
The latest CPI report on Tuesday morning was the first to fully include higher fuel costs brought about by the war and inevitably showed another big leap in retail inflation to 3.8% annualized, closing in on double the Fed’s 2% target (which it hasn’t met for five years now). Gas prices are up by 28% from a year ago and airfares by 21%. Notably, retail prices are now rising at a faster rate than wages.
Interest rates shifted upwards on the vanishing prospect of any rate cuts at all in 2026 or early 2027. Indeed, an increase in the Fed Funds Rate this year is now priced as being more likely than a rate cut. Wall Street winced at the data and the indexes pulled back and interest rates jumped.
Trump arrived in Beijing on Wednesday morning for a meeting with Chinese premier Xi after bizarrely telling journalists; “I don’t think about Americans’ financial situations”.
Kevin Warsh was waived through Congress as the next Fed chairman and was immediately confronted with a big problem. CPI’s baby brother, PPI, was released pre-market and came in red hot, indicating a jaw-dropping jump from 4.3% to 6.0% in the annualized wholesale rate of inflation.
The bond market was shocked and drove up medium and longer term interest rates. The 30-year Treasury rate blasted through 5.00% to its highest level since 2007, before the Great Financial Crisis. Stocks, however, took things in stride and tech stock traders in particular stepped in to buy Tuesday’s dip, pushing the indexes into the green and back to yet more record highs.
By the time markets opened on Thursday, all that had come out of China was meaningless drivel about partnership and obscure references to Confucius and Abraham Lincoln. Of far more interest was the latest Retail Sales data which showed continued steady, if not profligate, spending by the US consumer.
Despite the continued lack of anything interesting emanating from Beijing, stocks continued to move relentlessly higher, helped by a spectacular earnings report from Cisco. The major indexes reached their third set of all-time record highs of the week with the S&P 500 closing above 7500 for the first time ever and even the silly old dinosaur index that is inexplicably still followed by some people, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, broke through 50,000.
The complete nothing-burger that was the Trump/Xi summit came to an end on Friday with muddled messaging from the US delegation and no apparent progress on Iran or tariffs. After a horror-show of a trading session in Europe with stocks and bonds plunging as local interest rates reached multi-decade highs and continued rising energy prices, US equity indexes cooled off as stock traders finally joined bond traders in fretting about inflation risk and took a lot of money off the table.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
I think it’s important to identify and recognize what could go wrong here for stock markets. To be clear, these are possible scenarios, not predictions ..
Fed hikes interest rates: For the first time in years, the market-driven probability of a Fed Fund Rate increase by year-end is now higher than that of a cut as inflation continues to be a major and growing problem, fueled by tariffs and the oil price shock. A forced rate-hiking campaign could cause a major economic slowdown. The last time the Fed had to raise rates to control inflation in 2022, stocks dumped by more than 20%.
Stagflation materializes: It is the expected duration rather than the intensity of high inflation that matters. The longer energy prices stay high, the more entrenched elevated inflation will become, fueling possible stagflation and unlike in COVID-times, there will be no stimulus checks this time to help offset it.
The AI boom goes bust: Earnings reports have indicated colossal AI spending from a narrow group of tech companies that is potentially driving wider economic and corporate growth. If that expenditure were to be forcibly slowed due to poor investment returns, then the platform upon which a three-and-a-half year rally has been built could begin to crumble and many other sectors might be adversely impacted.
None of these three risks are imminent and the market is fundamentally strong. But stocks can go down, sometimes sustainably and I don’t want clients to be blindsided if it happens. Absent some kind of exogenous shock, any major decline is likely to be the result of one or more of these factors.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Your ability to take risk throughout your financial life will be influenced by three primary factors—your age, your liabilities and your level of wealth. As each increases, you should naturally want to take less risk.”
Maybe counterintuitive? Yes. Very sensible? Also yes. Important advice from Ritholtz’s Nick Maggiulli.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Risk management is less about how you respond to risk and more about recognizing how many things can go wrong before they actually do.”
Morgan Housel, partner at The Collaborative Fund.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPYM, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 0.2% last week, is up 8.4% so far this year and ended the week 1.4% below its all-time record closing high (05/14/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 2.3% last week, is up 12.8% so far this year and ended the week 3.5% below its all-time record closing high (05/06/2026).
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price fell 2.7% last week, is up 10.2% so far this year and ended the week 3.1% below its all-time record closing high (05/06/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬌ 3.69% (3.69% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.09% (3.90% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.26% (4.02% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.59% (4.38% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 5.14% (4.93% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 5.12% (4.95% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.37%, one month ago: 6.32%, one year ago: 6.81%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on June 17th?
0.25% higher than now .. ⬌ 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 99% probability (93% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 1% probability (7% a week ago)
With five more rate-setting meetings this year, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining Fed Funds interest rate changes in 2026?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 53%, one month ago: 50%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It was yet another weekend of nothing of substance war-wise for markets to chew on, apart from both sides ramping up the rhetoric and Trump posting some kind of characteristically detail-free vague promise called “Project Freedom” to somehow help guide tankers through the Strait of Hormuz.
Markets were unimpressed. Oil prices and interest rates spiked higher on Monday and stocks fell back from their record highs following exchanges of fire for the first time in weeks as we all got an unwelcome reminder that this war was not over.
Cracks in the fragile ceasefire continued to appear on Tuesday but neither side seems to yet to have reached the pain level required to be willing to announce its demise. For the US, that pain level probably stands at around $160 oil, a 4.75% 10 year Treasury rate and even deeper midterm woes for Republicans.
A buoyant risk-on stock market quickly recovered all of Monday’s losses, bolstered by Intel’s announcement of a deal with Apple. The indexes reached another new set of all-time highs. After the close, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) released sensational earnings, Trump shut down Project Freedom after less than two days and the average price per gallon at US pumps reached $4.56, its highest level since the summer of 2022.
Reports on Wednesday morning that the US and Iran were closing in on a one-page, 14-point Memorandum of Understanding and Secretary of State Rubio straight up telling Congress that the war was over sent oil prices and interest rates tumbling.
Stocks went vertical with Wall Street traders keen to consign the conflict to the history books and finally get back to their happy place where they could focus on corporate earnings, interest rate projections and economic data rather than constantly having to try and interpret grammatically-challenged social media posts.
The soaring rally spilled into Asia on Thursday with Japanese stocks in particular ripping higher, but wavered when markets opened in New York. Perhaps with one eye on the following day’s crucial employment numbers and in response to oil prices and interest rates slowing their declines from the previous day, Wall Street took its foot off the gas and the indexes closed in the red.
After the close, the US Court of International Trade ruled Trump’s imposition of 10% across-the-board Section 122 tariffs to be illegal, just weeks after the Supreme Court tossed out his IEEPA tariffs.
Further exchange of firebetween the US and Iran overnight was dismissed by Trump as a “love tap” . But it did cast some doubt on the prospects of a deal and sent oil prices briefly higher again on Friday ahead of the pre-market Jobs Report which showed a significantly greater-than-expected number of new payrolls and an unchanged unemployment rate of 4.3%.
This Goldilocks data confirmed a stable labor market and pushed back against fears of stagflation. Interest rates shifted lower and the stock indexes, boosted by another big day for Intel and several other semiconductor names, jumped again to wipe out Thursday’s losses and complete a sixth straight week of gains. The S&P 500 index notched its 15th new record high of the year (after almost 40 of them in 2025) and the NASDAQ scored its 11th.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
Market valuations are clearly stretched in the short term and there are still risks to monitor. But there are genuinely legitimate reasons for the new highs. So, while this market remains vulnerable to temporary downside air pockets on any US/ Iran disappointment, there are fundamentally solid financial positives to be found in the best earnings in over twenty years and a resilient US consumer that are supporting stock prices. While these factors remain in place, the risk of a major fall in the indexes is probably limited. But if they deteriorate, the drop from these levels has the capability to be dramatic.
Prediction betting markets at Polymarket, PredictIt and Kalshi are being pitchedon social media as a lucrative side hustle for young Americans squeezed by rent and student debt. However, the reality is that almost all of them are losing money, with over 100,000 accounts on Polymarket down by at least $1,000. Trade records show that the bulk of profitswere raked in by a tiny group of what appear to be automated bots while everyone else on the platform, in aggregate, lost $131 million.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Various AI platforms were asked to create and manage a stock portfolio. It didn’t go well.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“They’re literally running out of money at the end of the month.”
Steve Cahillane, CEO of Kraft Heinz, referring to low-income US consumers facing tariffs, rising gas prices and stubborn inflation
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPYM, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 2.4% last week, is up 8.2% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high (05/08/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 1.8% last week, is up 15.4% so far this year and ended the week 1.2% below its all-time record closing high (05/06/2026).
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 3.0% last week, is up 13.2% so far this year and ended the week 0.4% below its all-time record closing high (05/06/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.69% (3.68% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.90% (3.88% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬌ 4.02% (4.02% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.38% (4.39% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.93% (4.96% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.95% (4.97% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.30%, one month ago: 6.39%, one year ago: 6.76%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on June 17th?
0.25% higher than now .. ⬌ 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. ⬌ 93% probability (93% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬌ 7% probability (7% a week ago)
With five more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 57%, one month ago: 52%, one year ago: 42%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
A potentially blockbuster week laced with pivotal earnings reports from almost $30 trillion-worth of S&P 500 names including five of the Magnificent Seven, key economic data and central bank interest rate decisions at home and abroad began following a weekend of no discernible progress on the Iran War.
With limited credible conflict newsflow, Wall Street eased gently into the first half of the week on Monday, conserving its energy perhaps for a possibly more volatile second half. After solid sessions in Asia and Europe, US stocks essentially flatlined for the session but squeaked out just enough to notch more new all-time record highs for the S&P 500 and NASDAQindexes.
The Bank of Japan left local interest rates unchanged on Tuesday. Energy prices continued to climb with Strait of Hormuz traffic remaining at a standstill and the United Arab Emirates’ shock withdrawal from Saudi-dominated OPEC, raising the average price of a gallon of gas at US pumps to $4.30 and over $6.00 in California. Trump posting a picture of himself with a machine gun and the caption: “NO MORE MR. NICE GUY!” didn’t help.
US stocks faltered, pulling back from their record levels with the NASDAQ reversing hardest on a Wall Street Journal report of trouble at OpenAI which sent tremors through some of the firm’s many tech partners and acted as a sharp reminder to investors to maintain portfolios that are balanced across sectors.
Big Wednesday arrived with a Fed Funds Rate-setting announcement on tap followed by Jerome Powell’s final press conference as chairman and a tsunami of monster earnings after the closing bell.
The Fed obviously did nothing with interest rates but a split is clearly emerging on the committee between those looking to maintain a bias towards only focusing on cutting rates in the near future and other members looking for more symmetrical and flexible language that at least leaves the door open for possible interest rate hikes in response to the increasing inflation pressure brought about by tariffs and war.
In a lively press conference, Powell confirmed that he would stay on as a Fed governor once his chairmanship expires later this month, infuriating Trump. The indexes ended the session a little lower.
Broadly speaking, the earnings reports were graded by Wall Street as follows:
Alphabet/Google: Excellent job all round. A gold star for the teacher’s pet.
Microsoft: Could do better on AI service offerings. We aren’t angry, just a bit disappointed.
Meta: Overspending yet again on unproven, kinda strange stuff. You have to rein it in and we likely won’t be happy until you do.
Amazon: Revenues growing nicely, good work. But we do need to keep one eye on that spending of yours.
Long term US interest rates joined oil prices in touching wartime highs (5.00% on the 20-year and $126 respectively) on the last day of the month on Thursday before pulling back a little, continuing their non-confirmation of recent stock market exuberance (see below).
Central banks in Europe and the UK held local interest rates unchanged. Q1 US GDP estimates came in stronger than expected, sending the indexes shooting back to new record highs again despite the mixed tech earnings and the PCE index showing inflation continuing to run hot, soaring from 2.8% to 3.5% annualized, the biggest month-on-month increase for years.
The S&P 500 scored a 10% jump for the month of April, its best monthly performance since 2020. The Small Cap index and the NASDAQ did even better; up 12% and 16% respectively.
Apple reported after the close, beating expectations on most metrics but didn’t blow the doors off and the stock price shifted moderately higher on Friday as stocks began May as they had ended April by marching deeper into record territory with the S&P 500 index now on a five-week winning streak.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
I talked in last week’s report about the divergence between stock market performance and consumer sentiment. Another notable divergence is the one between stock market performance and that of other financial markets. Put simply, compared to the day the ceasefire was declared on April 7th, energy prices are now much higher, as is the 10-year Treasury yield. The S&P 500 index, meanwhile, has surged 9% over the same time frame.
To be clear, this lack of confirmation by oil and interest rate markets doesn’t mean that the rally in stocks is illegitimate. The strong earnings and solid economic data upon which it is based are real. Stock markets are assuming that the war has passed peak intensity and we are at least on a road to some kind of resolution. But neither oil nor interest rates are signaling that and this non-confirmation can be spun one of two ways.
Positively, it could mean that good earnings and economic data are so strong that they are swamping geopolitical concerns, providing an effective offset to event risk. Negatively, it could mean that the stock rally has simply been fueled by “fast money chasing” that has sent mega-cap tech stocks spinning higher on little more than general hope of a resolution and that there is a non-trivial risk that this could all reverse quickly and nastily.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Just three months stand between the average American household and bankruptcy.” The death of the American Dream is now official.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“The stock market isn’t always right, but it’s right far more often than any of us trying to predict what will happen next.”
Ben Carlson, Ritholtz Wealth Management
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPYM, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.0% last week, is up 5.7% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high (05/01/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 1.0% last week, is up 13.5% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high (05/01/2026).
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 0.6% last week, is up 10.0% so far this year and ended the week 1.8% below its all-time record closing high (04/17/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.68% (3.69% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.88% (3.78% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.02% (3.92% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.39% (4.31% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.96% (4.88% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.97% (4.91% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.23%, one month ago: 6.43%, one year ago: 6.76%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on June 17th?
0.25% higher than now .. ⬇︎ 0% probability (1% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 93% probability (94% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 7% probability (5% a week ago)
With five more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of the CME FedWatch Tool and is derived from futures market pricing as of Friday’s market close based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 55%, one month ago: 45%, one year ago: 37%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The cozy feeling of optimism that had carried stock markets to new all-time highs the previous week began to unravel over the weekend. Within hours of Trump boasting that "Iran has agreed to never again close the Strait of Hormuz”, Iran again closed the Strait of Hormuz, in response to the US refusal to lift its blockade.
The oil price jumped but stocks remained steady in Asia and Europe on Monday. The previously-buoyant mood on Wall Street soured as Trump assured us all that he was not going to extend the ceasefire. Iran cast doubt on its attendance at proposed negotiations in Pakistan. Markets flinched a little and the rally stalled with the indexes all slipping a touch lower.
Retail sales data was better than expected on Tuesday morning and stocks rose cautiously when markets opened on ongoing low trading volume before falling back as lingering hopes of imminent US/Iran negotiations evaporated and drove oil prices back into triple figures. The indexes all closed in the red again for their first back-to-back down-days of the month.
Just moments after the closing bell, Trump completely reversed course yet again, posting that he was indefinitely extending his ceasefire deadline “until discussions are concluded” while maintaining the naval blockade.
Stocks recovered solidly on Wednesday with tech taking the lead but a confused sense of limbo persisted in a vacuum of meaningful war news beyond Trump barking threats on social media, even as more mostly positive earnings reports continued to come out. The indexes defiantly held onto their gains throughout the session and both the S&P 500 and NASDAQ indexes reclaimed new all-time record highs.
Earnings from Tesla, IBM and Amex underwhelmed and brutal levels of mass layoffs and voluntary buyouts were announced by both Microsoft and Meta on Thursday. Stocks stagnated, albeit still hovering around record highs and then sank moderately with zero signs of any resolution of the standoff in the Strait of Hormuz. Both sides seem equally desperate to declare victory, but each are terrified of appearing to their domestic audiences to be making any kind of compromise. Energy prices rose for a fifth straight day.
A sensational earnings report from Intel, which screamed up by almost 30% at the open to break its record high from 2000 before cooling off a touch, pushed tech stocks sharply higher again on Friday morning. The indexes were then boosted further by the US announcement (notably unconfirmed by Iran) of a possible sequel to the failed high level face-to-face negotiations in Pakistan at the weekend to complete a fourth straight week of gains following four weeks of losses and, of course, at new all-time record highs.
I am losing count of the number of times I have been asked recently a version of the question; “How can we possibly be at new all-time highs, given what is going on?”
I see a number of reasons:
Financial markets are always forward-looking and anticipatory. A common investor mistake is to conflate events happening right now directly with the real-time daily direction of stock and bond prices. We are probably past peak uncertainty in the war. While the timeline is unclear to say the least, some kind of eventual diplomatic solution is still the most likely outcome.
The biggest market fear has always been that the conflict would send the price of oil spinning above $150 and towards $200 a barrel (at which point we will probably get massive demand destruction that will inevitably cap the price), not about whether its $75, $85 or $95. That $200 scenario remains unlikely, and as long as it stays that way, traders will give the diplomatic process the benefit of the doubt.
The Q1 earnings season is proving to be extremely robust. 80% of companies reporting so far have beaten estimates, some by a lot. At the end of the day, earnings are the prime driver of stock prices.
A strong dip-buying mindset remains alive and well and becomes self-fulfilling as investor reluctance to stay bearish for too long becomes reinforced time and time again by swift bounce-backs in price following any substantial declines.
AI is back, baby! Tech and AI-related names, which are for the most part less impacted by the conflict, are soaring again. Concerns over AI capital expenditure that were rampant earlier in the year have eased and many of these names comprise massive chunks of the weightings of the major indexes.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
This coming week is a highly consequential one. Beyond continued war developments, there’s a Big Wednesday that includes earnings from Alphabet/Google, Microsoft and Meta and a Fed Funds Rate decision (to likely do nothing - see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below). Amazon and Apple also report during the week.
Fed chairman nominee Kevin Warsh faced a grilling at his Senate confirmation hearing last week, including the accusation that he was simply Trump’s“glove puppet”. Despite his pledge to maintain central bank independence, the troubling signs were there as he declined to say who won the 2020 election and was unable to come up with a single Trump economic policy that he disagreed with. He also refused to come to the defense of Fed colleagues Lisa Cook and chairman Jerome Powell who were at the time both facing vindictive and obviously spurious legal proceedings at the behest of the president (the case against Powell was actually dropped later in the week), choosing instead to fire barbs at the current Fed chairman over recent policy that sounded remarkably like a Trump social media post. Warsh is all but certain to be confirmed by the Senate.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Stocks don’t always obey the fundamentals of the backdrop. Because they are owned by people, traded by algorithms created by people and perceptions change as quickly as human emotions.”
Ritholtz’s Josh Brown chimes in on the “AI is a bubble” theory.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“They don’t care about gas prices.”
American Express CEO Stephen Squeri, on the company’s customers.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
SPYM, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 0.5% last week, is up 4.8% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high (04/24/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 0.3% last week, is up 12.4% so far this year and ended the week 1.1% below its all-time record closing high (04/20/2026).
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price fell 1.5% last week, is up 9.4% so far this year and ended the week 2.4% below its all-time record closing high (04/17/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.69% (3.70% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.78% (3.71% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.92% (3.84% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.31% (4.26% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.88% (4.89% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬌ 4.91% (4.91% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.30%, one month ago: 6.30%, one year ago: 6.81%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on April 29th?
0.25% higher than now .. ⬌ 1% probability (1% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. ⬌ 99% probability (99% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬌ 0% probability (0% a week ago)
With six more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data is derived from futures market pricing based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%. Courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool as of Friday’s market close.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 60%, one month ago: 42%, one year ago: 31%
Data courtesy of barchart.com as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
To the surprise of almost no-one, the fleeting US/Iran talks in Pakistan over the weekend were a dismal failure. Sometime in between attending UFC fights, unsuccessfully interfering in Hungary’s election, posting an AI image of himself as a messiah and picking fights with the pope, Trump still found time to announce a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in a move designed to cripple Iran financially.
The main effect of such a move, of course, is to further deepen the world’s chronic energy supply shock (contemptuously dismissed last week by Treasury Secretary Bessent, net worth around $600 million, as "a small bit of economic pain") that is now resulting in soaring gas prices at the pump for Americans as well as thousands of flight cancelations, fuel rationing, commuting bans and power cuts in other parts of the world.
Entirely predictably, the oil price exploded back into triple digits and both stocks and bonds fell in Asia and Europe on Monday. US stocks also initially pulled back but in a relatively orderly fashion and on low trading volume. Trump then claimed that Iran had reached back out that morning to “make a deal” .
Oil prices swiftly retreatedbelow $100 and the indexes pushed back into the green, with the S&P 500 index wiping out its losses for 2026 and even closing above where it finished on February 27th, the day before the bombing began, when a barrel of oil cost a mere $67.
Q1 earnings season got properly under way on Tuesday morning with decent reports from some of the big banks. We also got another inflation indicator with PPI data proving to be sticky but stable. Stocks continued to march steadily higher throughout the session as energy prices continued to tumble to their lowest levels in three weeks, more on a lack of bad news rather than the presence of anything concrete or credible.
An extension of the ceasefire was strongly rumored on Wednesday morning and Trump called the conflict “very close to over”, although Iran pushed back heavily on that claim. Bank of America and Morgan Stanley reported very solid earnings.
The indexes drifted gently higher all day and interest rates eased, but it was enough to propel both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ to new all-time record highs with the former closing above 7000 for the first time ever. This is absolutely astounding six weeks into a deadly oil-impacting war, despite Trump’s bizarre characterization of it last week as just “a minor skirmish”.
Wall Street’s happy clappy mood was initially bolstered on Thursday by more pre-market expectation-busting earnings reports from the likes of Taiwan Semiconductor, Bank of New York and Pepsi.
Gains were later pared, however, on reliable independent reports of a likely much longer timeline for any US/Iran agreement than the Trump administration is claiming which sent oil prices higher, but the indexes still managed to push deeper into record territory.
Netflix reported earnings after the close, providing the season’s first major disappointment relative to expectations but Wall Street’s voracious risk appetite continued on Friday, especially after oil prices plunged following Iran’s initial announcement that the Strait of Hormuz would now be fully open to all traffic (subsequently qualified to exclude ships and cargoes linked to “hostile” countries) for as long as a ceasefire was in place.
The indexes extended their upward charge. The S&P 500 completed its third consecutive week of 3%+ gains on a three day record-breaking streak and the NASDAQ also closed at record highs again after scoring its thirteenth straight session in the green, something it hasn’t done since 2013.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
Wall Street is done with the Iran war and ready to move on (see .. AND I QUOTE .. below). We’ve seen this movie many times before where geopolitical crises turn out in retrospect to have been great buying opportunities. The playbook of not freaking out and fading any geopolitical disruption which has essentially worked since the Second World War seems to have played out yet again. US and global indexes fully round-tripped their conflict-related losses and broke to new all-time highs again just a month and a half after hostilities began, marking the third speedy April V-shaped recovery in six years after 2020 and 2025.
Trump went back to taking potshots at Fed chairman Jerome Powell last week, vowing to fire him if he does not give up his governorship position next month, something he is not required to do until 2028. However, as recently affirmed by the Supreme Court, the president has zero legal authority to do this and so Wall Street just rolled its eyes and shrugged it off as a non-story.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Coast FIRE (Financial Independence, Retire Early) has always been the most sensible diluted version of the somewhat dubious FIRE strategy of aggressive saving, investing and massive cost-cutting to build liquid assets to roughly 25-30X annual expenses and then switching to full spending mode well before traditional retirement age. AI could be causing a rethink.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
"So as far as the stock market is concerned, the war is over until further notice”.
Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of stockanalysis.com
S&P 500 sector data courtesy of State Street Investment Management
SPYM, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 4.5% in the last five days, is up 4.2% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high (04/17/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 5.5% in the last five days, is up 12.0% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high (04/17/2026).
VXUS, an International Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 3.0% in the last five days, is up 11.0% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high (04/17/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.70% (3.69% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.71% (3.81% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.84% (3.94% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.26% (4.31% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.85% (4.89% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.88% (4.91% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of Friday’s market close.
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.37%, one month ago: 6.15%, one year ago: 6.83%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey.
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on April 29th?
0.25% higher than now .. ⬇︎ 1% probability (2% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 99% probability (98% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬌ 0% probability (0% a week ago)
With six more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool as of Friday’s market close.
All data based on the current Fed Funds interest rate of 3.625%
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 53%, one month ago: 50%, one year ago: 30%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close.
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
A clearly exasperated Trump put out a series of unhinged expletive-ridden social media posts over the weekend threatening the destruction of civilian infrastructure in Iran starting on Tuesday evening which pushed oil prices deeper into triple digits, but there was very little in terms of credible clarity for traders to chew on at the weekend.
A week including some key economic data and the start of Q1 2026 earnings season kicked off quietly on a low-volume Monday session with a temporary pause in the headline roulette and stocks tentatively built on the previous week’s gains in a state of confused optimism ahead of potentially violent two-way volatility from either a brutal US/Israel onslaught or another TACO Tuesday.
In fact, Israel seemingly couldn’t wait to start hitting civilian targets in Iran and jumped the gun on Tuesday morning which pushed up energy prices. Trump, who appears to be treating this whole situation like some tawdry New York real estate transaction characterized by shameless brinkmanship and nasty threats, posted that “a whole civilization will die tonight”.
A sense of unease settled on Wall Street. Stock prices sank and interest rates drifted higher as the deadline grew closer. However, there was a late-session recovery on the back of rumors of some kind of diplomatic breakthrough brokered by Pakistan and the indexes closed unchanged on the day.
After the close, Trump capitulated, announcing a two-week suspension of all strikes on Iran, improbably claiming that the US had “already met and exceeded all military objectives”. In return, Iran agreed to conditionally re-open the Strait of Hormuz for the two-week period (but still charging crypto tolls to any traffic) and bilateral talks were set for the weekend in Pakistan.
As both sides desperately tried to spin the narrative as a win including undisguised victory laps with “mission accomplished” rhetoric from both Trump and Hegseth, traders scrambled frantically to re-price risk assets in the wake of the announcement. Oil prices crashed by the most since early COVID, interest rates tumbled and stock markets around the world absolutely skyrocketed in Asia and Europe for their biggest one-day gains in years.
When Wall Street opened on Wednesday, its comeback was a little less spectacular, but it was still a very strong day for the stock indexes. While it was unclear how long it would last, traders treated themselves to at least a day of euphoric relief. Some Q1 earnings began to trickle in and were mostly positive ahead of the banks kicking off the season in earnest this week.
After Wednesday’s massive dopamine hit, the jubilation subsided across global markets on Thursday with accusations already flying that terms were being violated and the Strait of Hormuz still basically closed.
Oil prices and interest rates bounced back higher overnight and international stocks fell. The latest PCE numbers and the most recent Q1 GDP estimate were published ahead of the US opening bell, showing sticky inflation, consumer spending stalling and a declining rate of economic growth. However, reports that Israel and Lebanon were planning direct ceasefire talks helped to reverse early losses on Wall Street and the indexes closed with light gains.
The late rebound followed through into Asian and European markets on Friday. Wall Street got to see the latest CPI data which saw inflation shoot up to an annualized rate of 3.3%. The month-to-month jump was the biggest since 2022, but over three-quarters of it was down to war-related energy price increases.
Wall Street chose to look through the hopefully-transitory oil price effect and stocks made further incremental gains when markets opened as traders marginally added to bets that the Fed may still cut the Fed Funds Rate at least once this year. This was despite the fact that Americans are feeling miserable right now with the monthly measure of Consumer Sentiment collapsing to the lowest level in history.
Trader reluctance to go into yet another highly unpredictable high stakes weekend with meaningful long positions caused prices to ease back to unchanged by the close and the indexes’ best week for months came to a relatively quiet end.
Markets are quite heavily banking on the war being in the rear view mirror relatively soon with a noticeable improvement in Strait of Hormuz traffic, even if not back to pre-conflict levels for a while. Whether tolls are going to be charged and exactly to whom they will be paid doesn’t matter much to traders who feel they can probably live with $80-$90 oil for a while.
Confirmation of this scenario will likely see a continuation of last week’s solid rally but in the case that everything goes to s**t (possibly as early as this weekend), this rather asymmetric view of things means that renewed significant falls in stock prices are far from off the table if oil prices get back into the $110-$150 range or higher.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Your brain is buggy software, badly infected with recency bias when it comes investing. Learn to zoom out.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“We won’t applaud those who set the world on fire just because they turn up with a bucket.”
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez refuses to fully endorse the ceasefire.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Welltower, Prologis) ⬆︎ 4.9% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) for the second week in a row ⬇︎ 3.9% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 3.6% last week, is down 0.4% so far this year and ended the week 2.6% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 4.0% last week, is up 6.2% so far this year and ended the week 3.8% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 4.9% last week, is up 5.7% so far this year and ended the week 3.6% below its all-time record closing high (02/25/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.69% (3.70% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.81% (3.79% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬌ 3.94% (3.94% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬌ 4.31% (4.31% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.89% (4.88% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.91% (4.88% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.46%, one month ago: 6.07%, one year ago: 6.62%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on April 29th?
0.25% higher than now .. ⬆︎ 2% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 98% probability (99% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 0% probability (1% a week ago)
With six more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool as of the market close on Friday.
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%).
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 48%, one month ago: 53%, one year ago: 39%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Reports predicting an imminent US ground invasion of Iran intensified over the weekend, triggering an apocalyptic response from the Iranians. The Houthis in Yemen joined the ever-expanding conflict, likely at the behest of Iran, complicating the increasingly chaotic picture further.
Trump ramped up his attempts to gaslight markets with a flurry of detail-free promises of an imminent deal one minute then wild threats of hellfire the next but, given a complete lack of anything credible to digest, Wall Street just isn’t listening any more.
For most of Monday US stocks did a whole lot of nothing with traders unsure as to what posture to take in a vacuum and no trustworthy information coming from any of the conflict participants. But the indexes swooned late in the session to finish in the red again with the S&P 500 creeping closer and closer to official correction territory.
A very rough month and quarter (see my Q1 Market Review here) came to an end at long last on Tuesday with the oil price at a four-year high following its biggest monthly jump in history and US gas prices at the pump averaging above $4/gallon for the first time since mid-2022 and rising, with some places in California seeing closer to $7.
However, the indexes roared higher for their best one-day session in close to a year which was put down to dip buyers and bargain hunters finally showing up on the back of Iran signaling possible co-operation in ceasefire talks and end-of-quarter window dressing which can often create some distortions on the final day.
Trump’s incoherent, jumbled flip-flopping continued after the close. He pledged to bomb Iran “back into the Stone Ages”, end the war in two weeks’ time and touted peace negotiations, all in literally the same sentence. He then promised to grace us all with even more of this kind of insight in a primetime address to the nation the following day.
Q2 kicked off on Wednesday and stocks followed through strongly on Tuesday’s monster rally following spectacular gains in Asia and Europe with a perception that it may be dawning on Trump that the current status of the war is untenable with his approval ratings in the toilet and the midterms coming up in a few months.
The president’s “very important” twenty-minute address was anything but. It was no more than a rambling, self-serving verbal summary of his recent social media posts and gave traders nothing new to work with.
Hard to believe, but Thursday was the one year anniversary of so-called “Liberation Day” and the subsequent market disruption caused by the tariff strategy, but attention is very much focused elsewhere at the moment. Asian and European markets fell back after the letdown of Trump’s disappointing update and Iran’s “bring it on, motherf*” -style response offered no peace**.
Wall Street initially followed the lead of overseas markets with the indexes giving back some of Wednesday’s gains as energy prices rocketed higher again on the prospect of at least two or three more weeks of escalating bombardment in the region and Trump’s bizarre reference to some kind of magical “natural” self-opening of the Strait of Hormuz. A late mini-surge dragged stock prices back to basically flat for the session and pushed interest rates lower ahead of the long weekend.
AJobs Report released on a Friday when the stock market was closed meant that we aren’t going to get to see any equity market reaction until Monday and that reaction could easily be swamped by geopolitical developments over the weekend.
It was a very solid report with new job creation above even the highest estimates and a fall in the unemployment rate to 4.3%, although downward revisions to prior data took off some of the shine.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
Going into a trading blackout with a high level of unknowable risk is an unsettling thought for Wall Street traders. This is leading to a relatively predictable pattern of end-of-week selling as relative optimism is typically replaced by risk aversion as the week goes on. Since the Iran war began, the S&P 500 has actually posted cumulative gains over the first three days of the week but has fallen 9% on Thursdays/Fridays. The rationale is simple; a lot can happen in the war during a two-day untradeable period, especially given Trump’s habit of deliberately announcing disruptive policies when US financial markets are closed.
After Trump’s nothing-burger address on Thursday provided no clues, traders have begun to scan the calendar for indications of when this war might end. The only event that really jumps out is the mid-May meeting between Trump and Chinese premier Xi. That’s still a long way off.
Nevertheless, after the best weekly gain of the year for stock markets, the bulls may be starting to chomp at the bit and the bears suddenly look a bit twitchy as Trump looks for an off-ramp to the unpopular war which has clearly not gone as breezily as he assumed it would. The sense is growing that this stock market may soon begin to look for excuses to head north instead of for reasons to sell.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
It’s a disgrace that this is being permitted. If this crap shows up in your 401k or 403b anytime soon, do NOT go anywhere near it!
.. AND I QUOTE ..
”You need nearly twice as much income today to afford the typical US home compared to before COVID.”
Nick Maggiulli, Ritholtz Wealth Management
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Welltower, Prologis) ⬆︎ 3.3% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) ⬇︎ 3.7% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.7% last week, is down 3.8% so far this year and ended the week 6.0% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 1.6% last week, is up 2.1% so far this year and ended the week 7.5% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 3.0% last week, is up 2.7% so far this year and ended the week 8.1% below its all-time record closing high (02/25/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.70% (3.73% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.79% (3.88% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.94% (4.06% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.31% (4.44% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.88% (4.99% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.88% (4.98% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.38%, one month ago: 5.99%, one year ago: 6.64%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on April 29th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 99% probability (96% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 1% probability (4% a week ago)
With six more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool as of the market close on Friday.
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%).
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 43%, one month ago: 61%, one year ago: 46%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Over the weekend Trump threatened to massively raise the stakes by bombing Iranian energy plants if the Strait of Hormuz (which had been closed for 24 days and counting) wasn’t open by Monday night, alarming Asian markets and US stock and bond futures. Just three hours before markets opened in the US on Monday, however, he posted that there were direct negotiations going on between an unidentified “top person” in Iran and the US that had been productive and he was postponing such attacks by five days since Iran “is begging to make a deal”.
News that any peace talks were happening at all was a surprise not only to Wall Street but also apparently to the Iranians, who quickly denied any such dialogue or an inclination to end the conflict.
A confused and increasingly war-weary stock market is clearly not enjoying having its chain yanked by a small number of social media accounts that increasingly feel like they are trying to manipulate asset prices via tactical releases of not always entirely accurate information.
Nevertheless, traders still backed off some of their more pessimistic bets and the stock indexes whip-sawed higher with a wild 3%+ swing in the S&P 500 from the pre-open lows to late-morning highs and closed deep in the green, although well off session highs, as oil prices, interest rates and gold all dropped meaningfully lower.
Monday’s cautious optimism failed to extend into Tuesday’s session with no let up in missile strikes in the region and the brief sharp decline in oil prices and interest rates came to a swift halt. The stock indexes meandered around aimlessly trying and failing to read mixed and sometimes contradictory war signals, eventually closing a touch lower.
Oil prices drifted lower overnight and continued to set the tone for stocks which jumped higher again on Wednesday morning, as some traders began positioning for possible conflict resolution with both sides apparently floating (vastly different) proposals.
Stocks have had a tendency of late to recover quickly and violently from geopolitical shocks and getting caught on the wrong side of such a move by acting on excess pessimism has proven to be painful in many cases. It was this notion that kept prices higher through the close.
However, ceasefire hopes began to fade on Thursday as each side laughed off the other’s proposal and anchored to their extremes. Oil prices and interest rates resumed their climb and stocks sank again as the reward vs. risk calculation of putting on additional long positions ahead of what could be a volatile weekend started to deteriorate.
Trump’s increasingly unconvincing attempts to paint a rosy picture at a cabinet meeting failed dismally to impress Wall Street and in response the stock indexes plunged further to levels not seen since September last year (albeit on relatively light volume), with the tech-heavy NASDAQ leading the nosedive and falling into official correction territory, to complete what was a truly horrible session for stocks.
After the closing bell, Trump delivered yet another of his now-famous TACO moments (they do always seem to occur right after a bad day in the stock market), extending his energy attack deadline by ten days. This did nothing to stem the bleeding however and the indexes (once again led by the NASDAQ) continued to crap out on Friday to close out another torrid week of losses. The five straight weeks in the red is the S&P 500’s worst streak since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in early 2022.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
Last week highlighted the current schizophrenic market reaction to the war; traders are afraid to be uninvested or short in case markets scream rapidly higher on some kind of resolution while they are also afraid to go risk-on as the odds increase that the fallout could be extensive and long-lasting. Which of these two positions seems to be the most reasonable changes literally from day to day, with the latter more in vogue than the former right now.
Trump may be steadily losing control of the situation, as most observers feared he would. As the quote below from Neil Dutta suggests, there are three major players involved in this conflict: the US, Iran and Israel. While the US may be keen on a ceasefire and a victory lap for its own domestic reasons, it’s not guaranteed that i) Israel will agree or abide by a cessation of hostilities, or ii) Iran will agree or abide by it. Case in point, Israel is continuing its ruthless operation in Gaza, has now opened a new invasion front in Lebanon and is bombing Iranian energy infrastructure. Unlike with tariffs, Trump cannot just flip a light switch here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
How to trade the war. Don’t.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
”You can’t TACO when you’re not the only party involved”
Neil Dutta, Head of Economic Research, Renaissance Macro Research
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) for the fourth week in a row ⬆︎ 5.5% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Google, Meta) ⬇︎ 4.6% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 2.2% last week, is down 7.0% so far this year and ended the week 9.1% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 0.3% last week, is down 1.2% so far this year and ended the week 10.5% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price was unchanged last week, is down 1.0% so far this year and ended the week 11.4% below its all-time record closing high (02/25/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.73% (3.74% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬌ 3.88% (3.88% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.06% (4.01% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.44% (4.39% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.99% (4.97% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.98% (4.96% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.22%, one month ago: 5.98%, one year ago: 6.65%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on April 29th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 96% probability (88% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 4% probability (12% a week ago)
With six more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool as of the market close on Friday.
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%).
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 44%, one month ago: 66%, one year ago: 40%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Global energy markets braced for another week of turmoil after a weekend US attack (“for fun” according to Trump) on Iran’s vital oil export facility on Kharg Island further exacerbated supply disruption.
This kept the oil futures price above $100 to start the week continuing the downward pressure on Asian and European stocks on Monday. Wall Street was beginning to tune out Trump veering incoherently between public threats of intensified strikes, promises of a quick conclusion and victory laps followed by declarations that there was still a lot of bombing left to do.
Nevertheless, Wall Street recovered some of its recent losses to close in the green as reports trickled in that a limited number of tankers were making it through and the price of oil eased a little to straddle the $100 level.
The tentative gains in US stocks continued into Tuesday after favorable sessions in Asia and Europe with the oil price taking a breather from its madcap volatility. The international community’s response to Trump’s “invitation” to send forces to help police the Strait of Hormuz ranged from ambivalence to swift out-of-hand rejection, but in the end was pretty much a blanket “thanks but no thanks” all round.
With two moderately positive sessions under its belt, Wall Street faced Fed Day on Wednesday in a fog-of-war world with energy prices more than 30% higher than where they were when the FOMC rate-setting committee last met in January and renewed oil price jitters after overnight strikes on multiple Persian Gulf oil facilities and stepped-up rhetoric from Iran. A hotter-than-expected PPI inflation report got the day off to a rocky start.
As everyone knew it would, the committee left the Fed Funds Rate unchanged at 3.625% (with only one dissent and that was from Trump’s manservant on the committee, Stephen Miran). The mostly unchanged quarterly Dot Plotssaw the majority of the 19 meeting participants pointing to just one rate cut before year-end, although several officials anticipate no reductions at all in 2026. One member even projected a rate increase by mid-2027.
In the press conference, soon-to-be-outgoing chairman Jerome Powell expressed concern at where inflation seems to be heading and finally addressed his future at the Fed. The two-day gain in stock prices was quickly wiped out and shorter term interest rates jumped higher in response.
Thursday saw European central banks in the Eurozone, UK, Switzerland and Sweden joining Japan, Canada and the US in holding interest rates unchanged. There was more escalation in the Middle East with both Israel and Iran (much to Trump’s annoyance) striking energy facilities in the region, temporarily sending oil futures hurtling back towards $120.
Stagflation fears continue to grow. There just wasn’t a lot of good news out there and the S&P 500 and NASDAQ fell back again, although they did close well off their session lows. Interest rates continued their bumpy ride, marching relentlessly upwards with the impactful 10 year Treasury rate making new highs for the year.
Hopes of some kind of positive bounce-back on Friday were dashed as reports emerged of a potentially risky proposal for a US ground troop occupation of Iranian energy facilities and Trump branded fellow NATO member-nations as “cowards” for scoffing at his idea that they should somehow get more deeply embroiled in a war cooked up by his increasingly isolated administration and Israel, a conflict that is deeply unpopular with their own parliaments and voters.
Stocks plummeted, led lower by tech names and interest rates roared higher in both Europe and the US as traders are now judging that any hopes of a swift end to this war appear to be rapidly evaporating. This was all despite the White House’s increasingly frantic but decreasingly credible messaging that everything is absolutely fine, that this will all wrap up soon, that the Strait of Hormuz “will re-open itself” and that energy prices will quickly revert to pre-war levels as if nothing had happened.
The outcome was another brutal down-week for both stocks and bonds and another vigorous up-week for interest rates and energy prices.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
All the major US and international stock indexes are now negative for 2026 and are all trading below their technically important 200-day moving averages.
The NASDAQ has now dropped in nine of the past ten weeks.
At one point on Friday afternoon, the NASDAQ, the Russell 2000 Small Cap and the MSCI International indexes all entered into technical corrections, down more than 10% from a recent high.
Gold just had its worst week in over 40 years. So much for the popular “safe haven” theory!
According to futures prices, the most likely expected number of Fed Funds Rate cuts this year is now zero (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below).
The market probability that the Fed actually increases interest rates sometime in 2026 soared from literally 0% a week ago to over 30% by Friday.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Six (not-so) little lies that we tell ourselves about money.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Once you have something, it means nothing to you.”
Richard Nixon
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) for the third week in a row ⬆︎ 2.8% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) ⬇︎ 4.9% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 2.1% last week, is down 4.5% so far this year and ended the week 7.1% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 1.8% last week, is down 1.6% so far this year and ended the week 10.8% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price fell 2.7% last week, is down 1.0% so far this year and ended the week 9.0% below its all-time record closing high (02/25/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.74% (3.72% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.88% (3.73% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.01% (3.87% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.39% (4.28% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.97% (4.89% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.96% (4.90% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.11%, one month ago: 6.01%, one year ago: 6.67%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on April 29th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 88% probability (94% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 12% probability (6% a week ago)
With six more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool as of the market close on Friday.
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%).
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 48%, one month ago: 66%, one year ago: 41%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The oil price blasted through $119 over the weekend with the Strait of Hormuz still closed to traffic, forcing major producers to curb production with storage facilities full to the brim. Iran signaled no let-up in its reaction to being bombed by selecting a continuity hardliner as its new leader.
Asian stocks collapsed on Monday in response with Japanese equities entering an official correction. European markets also crumbled, with stocks giving up the entirety of their once-substantial 2026 gains and local interest rates soared.
US stocks are less impacted by energy prices, but still shifted sharply lower at the open before staging a dramatic comeback after the oil price fell back under $90 on the back of Trump seemingly setting up for a quick victory lap, claiming that the conflict is “very complete”. He also asserted that the military operation is “far ahead” of its initial four- to five-week timeframe. The indexes whipsawed and surged to close the session deep in the green.
Asian and European markets mostly took Trump at his word and bounced back nicely but, with zero sign of any de-escalation on the ground and Hegseth contradicting his boss by signaling an active intensification of the conflict, Wall Street was far more skeptical of the president’s claims on Tuesday and failed to follow through on Monday’s furious late rally.
The indexes closed the session unchanged even as the oil price continued its head-spinning reversal, briefly dipping below $80 at one point after Energy Secretary Wright somehow managed to falsely claim that a tanker had been successfully escorted through the Strait.
Overnight, Oracle, whose stock price had been cut in half since September, surprised to the upside with its earnings and the International Energy Agency (IEA) proposed the largest release of reserves in history in an attempt to bring down the price of oil.
Before the open on Wednesday, the latest CPI numbers showed February inflation was unchanged as expected at a 2.4% annualized rate. The oil price failed dismally to respond as hoped to the IEA proposal, climbing back above $90.
Stocks essentially flatlined all day and interest rates moved higher in the absence of any further meaningful reliable information coming from the front lines and continued confused messaging from US government officials about the ultimate goals and likely duration of the war.
With three oil tankers ablaze in the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday after being attacked by Iran despite Trump’s empty promises of naval protection, the US administration announced that it would release some of its own Strategic Petroleum Reserve, suspended the Jones Act and bizarrely even eased oil sanctions on Iran’s close ally, Russia, in increasingly desperate attempts to rein in the unstable oil price which had by now roared back above $100 after a defiant message from Iran’s new leadership and Israel’s continued brutal pounding of Lebanon. The stock indexes took a sizable leg lower with tech and financial names having a particularly rotten session.
Friday was another miserable day for stocks as oil traders refused to be gaslit by Trump and Hegseth’s chest-thumping rah-rah war rhetoric, focusing instead on facts and data and holding the price above $100. The latest GDP estimate (+0.7%) showed even slower economic growth than had been earlier feared and we also saw the highest measure of PCE inflation (+3.1%) for over two years, sending interest rates spiraling higher and snuffing out any slight lingering hopes of a Fed Funds Rate cut this week (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below). The S&P 500 and the NASDAQ quickly gave up early gains and sank again to end the week lower and deeper in the red for for 2026.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
Everything right now is tethered to energy pricing. That leash is jerking financial markets around as oil and gas prices surge, retreat and then surge again with each new headline. Market memories have begun to flood back to early 2022, when initial highly bullish sentiment was quickly derailed by an oil-price-impacting war in Ukraine and resulted in a distinctively bad year for both stocks and bonds.
Investors are still just about pricing in a short war. That widespread assumption rests on history and political game theory; Trump’s tendency to back down whenever things get tough, gas prices at the pump spiking ahead of the midterms later this year with both the House and the Senate in play and a calculation that Iran won’t be willing to keep enduring such an air assault.
Trading algorithms used by major institutions are trained to react to facts and data, not to random tweets and social media nonsense. Last week’s shameless episode of energy secretary and cabinet member Chris Wright deliberately lying on X (even including a fake video) about a market-moving event with the clear intent of trying to manipulate oil prices lower for political gain casts further doubt on how much Wall Street is able to trust any war-related information coming out of this administration.
I was recently interviewed about my practice by Vetta-Fi who host this weekend’s annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas that I am attending. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Accept uncertainty as a starting point.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Trump might have declared that the war was running ahead of schedule, but no-one seems to have told the Iranians.”
Chris Beauchamp, Chief Market Analyst at IG
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) for the second week in a row ⬆︎ 2.0% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Financials (two biggest holdings: Berkshire Hathaway, JP Morgan) ⬇︎ 3.3% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 1.5% last week, is down 2.9% so far this year and ended the week 5.1% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 1.7% last week, is up 0.2% so far this year and ended the week 7.6% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price fell 1.6% last week, is up 1.7% so far this year and ended the week 9.0% below its all-time record closing high (02/25/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.72% (3.69% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.73% (3.56% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.87% (3.72% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.28% (4.15% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.89% (4.74% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.90% (4.77% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.00%, one month ago: 6.09%, one year ago: 6.65%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on March 18th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 98% probability (96% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 2% probability (4% a week ago)
With seven more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool as of the market close on Friday.
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%).
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 56%, one month ago: 65%, one year ago: 33%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The US and Israel teamed up to launch a large scale attack on Iran over the weekend killing many hundreds including the country’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The entire Middle East moved onto a war footing as the Iranians retaliated by firing missiles across the region.
Energy prices naturally skyrocketed in response and stocks gapped severely lower in Asia and Europe on Monday. US markets initially followed suit at the open, but in a pretty orderly fashion with the prevailing consensus expectation of a limited conflict that will end relatively quickly with Trump eager to declare a swift victory. By mid-afternoon, the losses had been fully recovered and the stock indexes finished the session lightly higher, but the recent steep fall in interest rates came to a screeching halt and reversed course.
While Wall Street shrugged off war worries on Monday, Asian and European markets seemed far more concerned as energy prices continued to surge and local stocks and bonds were hammered again on Tuesday.
Emerging reports that America’s hand had been forced by Israel at the weekend cast some doubt on Trump’s ability to control the scale and duration of the conflict and US stocks and bonds re-joined the pity party, tumbling to finish the day deep in the red, although off their lows from earlier in the session after some bottom-fishers began to show up.
Wednesday was another frightful day for Asian markets which continued to crumble with South Korea, previously the world’s best performing stock market in 2026, getting particularly brutalized, suffering the worst one-day crash in its history and down ~20% in just two trading days.
European markets were much more upbeat and by the time Wall Street opened, the dip buyers were large and in charge, carrying the US indexes nicely higher and back to where they were before the bombings began.
Asia rebounded hard on Thursday, with South Korea erasing all of Wednesday’s horrendous losses within minutes of opening. The bargain-hunting frenzy on Wall Street evaporated, however, after reports emerged of interventionist plans for the government to take control of all AI-related export licensing and labor market data and still-soaring oil/gas prices dampened Fed Funds Rate cut hopes. US stocks dived sharply lower again and interest rates continued to march higher.
A horrifying Jobs Report on Friday showed 92k jobs lost in February, raising the unemployment rate to 4.4% and January’s Retail Sales disappointed vs. expectations. Combined with escalating war-related inflation fears, this all gave off a strong whiff of stagflation. The S&P 500 closed the day and the week in the red and all of its 2026 gains are now up in smoke with traders reluctant to go into a potentially unstable weekend with higher-risk long positions on their books.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
While investors should brace for short term volatility, the Middle East conflict in its current state is still not likely to be a bearish game-changer for equities. The military operation does not fundamentally change the economic backdrop for US companies, with the caveat that the Strait of Hormuz is the key variable in this whole saga since markets tend to view conflicts like this through the prism of energy prices. If traffic remains largely halted for several weeks, that will further spike the price of oil/gas and thereby pressure stocks. Absent that scenario, the medium term direction of stock markets is still going to be determined by AI sentiment, economic growth/inflation and Fed Funds Rate cut expectations.
Five days into the Iran war, the price of gold was below where it was when the first bombs dropped on Tehran. In 2022, as inflation reached its peak of over 9%, the price of gold moved lower. With inflation well below its historical average of 3% in 2025, the price of gold rocketed. It’s high time to toss into the garbage the widespread, simplistic idea that you always need to immediately run to gold as an automatic guaranteed “safe haven” hedge as soon as geopolitics blows up or when inflation spikes. The data simply does not back up these commonly-accepted myths.
More than $500 million had been staked on Polymarket about the timing of a US strike against Iran by the time it happened on February 28th. Six of the players who reaped combined profits in the millions by correctly anticipating the day of the attack were newly-created user accounts (including one called “magamyman”) that had never placed any other wagers on the platform before. Suspicions about insider trading on prediction markets have grown almost as rapidly as their trading volumes.
I was recently interviewed about my practice by Vetta-Fi who host next weekend’s annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The amount of 401(k) millionaires just hit a new high. Fidelity reported that the average balance held on their NetBenefits platform rose 11% to $146,100. A reminder that this is the average, NOT the median, which is much, much lower. Bigger balances are doing a lot of the heavy lifting here.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“In a fog of war, markets tend to trade probabilities rather than shifting facts.”
Phil Serafino, Bloomberg.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s S&P 500 market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) ⬆︎ 1.2% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Newmont) ⬇︎ 6.7% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 2.0% last week, is down 1.4% so far this year and ended the week 3.7% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 4.0% last week, is up 6.2% so far this year and ended the week 7.6% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price fell 7.0% last week, is up 3.4% so far this year and ended the week 7.5% below its all-time record closing high (02/25/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.69% (3.67% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.56% (3.38% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.72% (3.51% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.15% (3.97% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.74% (4.57% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.77% (4.64% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates.*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 5.98%, one month ago: 6.10%, one year ago: 6.63%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on March 18th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 96% probability (95% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎4% probability (5% a week ago)
With seven more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool as of the market close on Friday.
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%).
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 65%, one month ago: 67%, one year ago: 47%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Upon further review, a recalibrating, not retreating, Trump decided at the weekend that his 10% supplemental temper tantrum tariff on the whole of planet Earth under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 was somehow not enough and he raised it to 15% and also vowed to use the manipulation of trade licenses to “do terrible things” to countries around the world, following the Supreme Court verdict that his signature IEEPA tariffs were illegal.
After quiet holiday-impacted sessions in Asia and Europe, US markets spent a winter storm-blitzed Monday trying to figure out the balance between the swirl of uncertainty generated by the ruling and the fact that, even with the weekend’s additional imposition, the effective average US tariff rate is now a bit lower and more time-limited than it was before the judgement.
Wall Street seemed paralyzed at the open and not just by the snowmaggedon in New York. But then the European Union announced a completely understandable pause in its ratification of the trade deal with the US “pending more clarity”. Software and e-commerce names were spooked by an apocalyptic Substack postfrom an independent research firmthat went viral. IBM’s stock price had it worst day this century. The indexes decided that the only way was down and closed sharply lower.
Asian markets returned to normal on Tuesday after the extended lunar new year holiday and celebrated with gains. Fedex became the first company to sue the US government for a full refund of illegally-imposed tariffs and by the end of the week, 2,000 more lawsuits had been filed. The indexes recovered most of Monday’s losses but trading was cautious ahead of any possible outlandish announcements in Trump’s State of the Union speech later in the evening.
The president theatrically doubled down on tariffs without mentioning China once and downplayed the issue of affordability, neither of which are likely to do much to slow his rapidly-falling approval ratings.
Trump referenced Trump Child Accounts in his State of the Union speech. I recently created an explainer for these. You can read it here.
But there was nothing meaningfully new for Wall Street to chew on on Wednesday and stocks resumed their steady climb back out of Monday’s hole with Nvidia earnings on deck after the close, which have taken on the role as a sort of State of the Union for AI.
The company’s earnings beat expectations and it delivered its usual happy-clappy revenue outlook, but it wasn’t a huge wow and the vigorous two-day stock rebound ran out of steam when markets opened on Thursday. An unenthusiastic response to Nvidia’s numbers pushed the stock price down by over 5% which naturally turned the indexes into the red again and they closed significantly lower.
Stocks continued to tank on Friday after PPI data provided a bit of an inflation scare and AI bubble concerns persisted as Nvidia’s armor seems to have been pierced with another big price drop. Apple and Meta got battered too. A plunge in a number of financial stocks following the collapse of a major UK mortgage lender didn’t help either. The S&P 500 finished lower for the day, the week and the month and is pretty much only flat year to date.
As February came to a close, European stocks wrapped up their eighth straight month of gains, their longest such streak since 2013. The S&P 500, in contrast, suffered its biggest monthly drop since April. Treasury bonds had their best month in over a year as interest rates sank across the curve (the 10-year dropped below 4.00% last week) and the average 30-year fixed rate mortgage in the US fell below 6.00% for the first time in over three years.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
The four pillars of the large cap US stock rally since late 2022 (in order of importance: i) AI enthusiasm, ii) ongoing Fed Funds Rate cuts, iii) stable economic growth and iv) tariff clarity) are still just about in place if we look at them in a medium/longer term time frame, but they are all experiencing meaningful difficulties right now to one degree or another. This is why the rally in the major US indexes is stalling and assets are rotating into smaller capitalization and non-US holdings.
Another feature of this rotation is that it is rewarding the stocks of companies with lots of capital assets that are costly to replicate and whose core businesses are less exposed to technological annihilation. Wall Street has of course come up with a snappy acronym for this group; HALO (Heavy Assets, Low Obsolescence). We are talking about names like McDonalds, Caterpillar, John Deere, Exxon-Mobil, Coca-Cola, Boeing and even the airlines.
At the other end of the spectrum, SaaS (Software as a Service) stocks have become ground zero for concerns that AI could potentially destroy earnings power for certain market sectors and these stocks have been badly hurt this year. We are talking about names like Oracle, Palantir, Salesforce, Snowflake, Adobe, Workday, ServiceNow and many others.
With the price crash from its peak reaching 50% in just four months, almost half the Bitcoin in circulation is now worth less than what its holder originally paid for it. That is why every attempted rally is dying on arrival as burned holders react to each bounce by aggressively selling, constantly killing any upward momentum. That capitulation has a compounding effect. Every sale at a loss removes a holder who might otherwise have been a future buyer.
I was recently interviewed by Vetta-Fi who host the annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas about my practice. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
A checklist of what to do to be a successful long term investor .. and, very importantly, in what order.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“CEOs are going to hold off, waiting for some form of clarity which they’re not going to get. This is chaos reigns.”
Bill George, former CEO of Medtronic
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) ⬆︎ 3.2% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Financials (two biggest holdings: Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan) ⬇︎ 2.0% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 0.5% last week, is up 0.6% so far this year and ended the week 1.7% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 1.2% last week, is up 6.2% so far this year and ended the week 3.8% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 0.5% last week, is up 11.1% so far this year and ended the week 0.6% below its all-time record closing high (02/25/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.67% (3.69% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.38% (3.48% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.51% (3.65% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.97% (4.08% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.57% (4.66% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.64% (4.72% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.01%, one month ago: 6.10%, one year ago: 6.76%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on March 18th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 95% probability (96% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 5% probability (4% a week ago)
With seven more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool as of the market close on Friday.
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%).
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 66%, one month ago: 66%, one year ago: 57%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
US markets were closed on Monday for Presidents’ Day after an unusually uneventful weekend on the newswires. Asian and European equities were quiet, but gold, silver and crypto all continued to skid lower and futures trading indicated a shaky open for Wall Street the next day.
The rotation out of certain tech sectors resumed on Tuesday morning and the indexes in general, but the NASDAQ in particular, stumbled out of the gate. Selected software, logistics and real estate names were still being viewed as potential longer term victims of AI and as such remained in Wall Street’s crosshairs at the opening bell.
A positive turnaround kicked in at lunchtime that saw the indexes eventually close unchanged on the day, but it was put down to dip-buyers and bottom-fishers swooping in rather than any real alleviation of the concerns that are at the root of the current price fragility. Meanwhile, European stocks reached more new all-time record highs, emphasizing the US stock market’s worst start to a year relative to other global stock markets since 1995.
We got a big economic data dump on Wednesday morning, showing that industrial production jumped by the most in almost a year, that housing starts hit a five-month high and that durable goods orders declined in line with expectations.
The minutes from the Fed’s most recent rate-setting meeting revealed that most committee members appear to have little appetite for cutting the Fed Funds Rateagain any time soon, believing that downside risks to employment have moderated while the threat of persistent inflation remains, particularly following confirmation from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of multiple reports showing that American consumers and businesses are bearing 90%+ of all tariff costs.
The bargain-hunting continued with some disproportionate buying of the most recently-damaged names with a sense that the tech punishment meted out by traders recently may have been overdone. The stock indexes finished moderately higher.
The US trade deficit has now ballooned to its widest level since the 1960s as data released on Thursday morning showed that exports fell hard and imports rocketed, pushing back hard against the happy-clappy narrative being pushed by the administration. Increased geopolitical concerns in and around Iran also dampened enthusiasm by spiking oil prices again and the indexes took a dive.
We learned from pre-market releases on Friday that PCE annual inflation in December rose to 2.9% and that the latest (shutdown-impacted) Q4 GDP growth estimate crashed from 4.4% to 1.4%.
But the big news came at 10am ET when the Supreme Court struck down and overturned most of Trump’s tariffs (all of those under the IEEPA statute) by ruling that he broke the law when he imposed them, opening the door to utter chaos as companies and countries seek to swiftly drain the US Treasury of up to $170 billion in refunds for illegally-charged tariffs and international trade deals were immediately invalidated.
A scorned Trump went completely off the rails, slamming Supreme Court justices as "fools and lapdogs" who had been influenced by foreign “slimeballs” and lashed out by instantly imposing a new snap 10% (non-IEEPA) tariff on the entire world, which he later raised to 15%.
Amazingly, stock prices barely responded, moving somewhat higher on the rather dubious idea that this was some kind of tariff reprieve while seemingly not showing much concern about the sheer mayhem that could be generated by the ruling and the notoriously thin-skinned and impulsive president's highly unpredictable potential responses, particularly right before a State Of The Union speech on Tuesday (where, interestingly, protocol dictates a handshake between Trump and all the Supreme Court justices!) and with the US military poised to strike Iran on his say-so.
The stock indexes closed in the green for the week but this upcoming five days has firestorm potential, including Nvidia’s earnings on Wednesday.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
Holding an index long term using an ETF or mutual fund is not as static an investment as you might think. Since 1985, 365 companies have lost their place in the S&P 500 and been replaced, an almost 75% turnover averaging about 9 ejections per year. This self-adjustment benefits long term investors over extended periods of time by adapting their holdings according to what is happening in the economy without a need for them to guesstimate when to make sell and buy decisions. Holding an individual stock is a completely static investment that involves market amateurs needing to play the fool’s game of making the kind of timing judgments that even highly-paid full-time market professionals routinely fail at.
Alphabet/Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta have now lost a combined $1 trillion in value since their latest quarterly earnings releases. Wall Street is showing signs of falling out of love with some of the names that have worked so well for years as rising spending fuels fears that these companies are building too much, too fast. This doesn’t mean that the three-year old bull market in stocks is over or that the tech sector is suddenly a bad investment, but it does mean we should anticipate likely heightened volatility.
I was recently interviewed by Vetta-Fi who host the annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas about my practice. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Replacing facts with noise is an awful way to manage your money.” Ritholtz’s Tony Isola urges us not to mistake discomfort for danger.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“It’s no longer the case that the company that spends the most on AI infrastructure wins”
Tom Essaye, founder and president, Sevens Report
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta) ⬆︎ 1.9% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Walmart, Costco) ⬇︎ 1.8% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.1% last week, is up 1.1% so far this year and ended the week 1.2% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 0.6% last week, is up 7.5% so far this year and ended the week 2.6% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.2% last week, is up 10.5% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high.
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.69% (3.68% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.48% (3.40% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.65% (3.61% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.08% (4.04% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.66% (4.64% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.72% (4.69% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.09%, one month ago: 6.08%, one year ago: 6.85%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on March 18th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 96% probability (90% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 4% probability (10% a week ago)
When is the most commonly-expected month of the next Fed Funds interest rate cut?
With seven more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool and Polymarket as of the market close on Friday.
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%).
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 65%, one month ago: 63%, one year ago: 59%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
A jam-packed week of major economic data and more earnings reports began on Monday with Japanese stocks reaching all-time record highs after the weekend’s landslide election victory of prime minister Takaichi’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party. Meanwhile, the sprawling Epstein scandal engulfed Commerce Secretary Lutnick and the related political crisis in the UK drove local interest rates meaningfully higher.
The feel-good vibes from the previous Friday’s dramatic stock turnaround on Wall Street continued into Monday’s session with the bulls back in control and the indexes made up more of the ground lost during the three-day tech wreck of February 3rd-5th, pulling the S&P 500 back to within touching distance of yet another all-time record high.
After another upbeat session in Asia where stocks are outperforming US equities by the most this century, a mixed premarket on Wall Street on Tuesday saw underwhelming earnings from Coca-Cola, a solid report from Spotify and a disappointing December Retail Sales number.
Stocks seemed undecided about how to proceed, obviously totally dismissing Trump’s idiotic prediction of a 15%+ GDP increase this year (it’s currently running at a historically quite high level of 4.4%). In the end the indexes went nowhere, closing fractionally lower. Interest rates continued to sink.
Jobs Report day dawned on Wednesday and when the numbers dropped pre-market, we got a positive blowout which pushed back on the prior week’s gloomy labor market statistics that had helped contribute to the mini-crash in the indexes.
New job creation in January obliterated estimates (with particularly robust employment in education and healthcare) and the overall unemployment rate fell to 4.3%. This signal of economic strength initially boosted stock prices and interest rates briefly spiked back higher as the data poured cold water on the need for any more imminent Fed Funds Rate cuts.
But attention quickly shifted back from trading headlines to more general themes like where we are on tariffs (sixHouse Republicans voted with Democrats to block Trump’s tariffs on Canada), earnings durability and capital expenditure plans (especially on AI). The indexes pulled back to where they started and then flatlined for the rest of the day.
European stocks reached new all-time highs overnight on Thursday. Before US markets got under way, we got results from Cisco which showed thin margins and included a downbeat outlook and some pretty dire numbers from Coinbase and both stocks were heavily punished, but McDonalds impressed with its report. The number of existing home sales plummeted.
The indexes got off to another sluggish start before collapsing in the afternoon to close considerably lower on growing fears of AI disruption of industries like real estate, law, media, travel, logistics and financial services as well as something of a reassessment of the previous day’s jobs data. Meanwhile, gold, silver and crypto began to crap out again.
Shutdown-distorted January CPI inflation data was finally released on Friday morning and came in pretty much as expected with the annualized rate easing to 2.4%, mostly driven by a fall in gas prices and a stabilization in shelter costs but tariff-impacted prices continue to increase at an alarming pace.
Nevertheless, a sense of having dodged an inflation bullet pushed stocks up early on before the indexes fizzled out to finish flat for the day but down for the week ahead of another long weekend. Bonds had their best week since October as two-year and ten-year interest rates tumbled (see INTEREST RATES below).
Some things I’m thinking about ..
Traders are no longer mindlessly taking the AI story at face value and are starting to respond by hiding out in old school names from sectors likely to be less penetrated by AI, such as Consumer Defensive, Industrials and Materials.
AI was supposed to be a slam dunk trade. However, it is now becoming a potential challenge for investors, not so much in terms of the firms building it out, but to the stocks of some major companies whose underlying business models are threatened by it.
Developing AI skepticism (described by one analyst as a gradual change from “AI-phoria to AI-phobia”) is also impacting the relative global performance of the tech-dependent overall US stock market (as represented by the S&P 500) which currently sits in a rather sad 69th position in this year’s league table of 92 stock indexes from around the world (South Korea is top of the pile).
Delinquency rates on loans ranging from mortgages to credit cards rose to their highest level since 2017, now standing at 4.8% of all outstanding US household debt. The increase was mainly driven by rising defaults in mortgage payments among low-income and younger borrowers as well as the resumption of reporting on student loan repayments.
I was recently interviewed by Vetta-Fi who host the annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas about my practice. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“When you admit that you don’t know the future, it’s a lot easier to deal with it when it doesn’t go as planned.”
Ritholtz’s Nick Maggiulli on why the consensus can often be wrong and how to stay onside when this happens.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“You just have to be prepared to be wrong and understand that your ego had better not depend on being proven right.”
Peter Bernstein, financial historian, economist and educator
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) ⬆︎ 7.3% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Financials (two biggest holdings: Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase) ⬇︎ 4.8% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 1.3% last week, is flat so far this year and ended the week 2.3% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 0.8% last week, is up 6.8% so far this year and ended the week 3.2% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.7% last week, is up 9.2% so far this year and ended the week 1.0% below its all-time record closing high (02/11/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬌ 3.68% (3.68% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.40% (3.50% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.61% (3.76% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.04% (4.22% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.64% (4.80% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.69% (4.85% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.11%, one month ago: 6.10%, one year ago: 6.87%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on March 18th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 90% probability (77% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 10% probability (23% a week ago)
With seven more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 67%, one month ago: 64%, one year ago: 59%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The weekend’s headlines were dominated by yet more repulsive Epstein slime which has thankfully (so far) not seeped into the consideration of US financial markets, although UK Prime Minister Starmer is certainly feeling the heat about probable related diplomatic cover-ups. The recent gold and silver party came to a crunching halt and prices utterly collapsed in what was the biggest precious metals crash in modern history.
The carnage extended to crypto which has finally been exposed as nothing more than a speculative asset. Bitcoin is now in complete free-fall, having crashed by 50% in three months and by 27% already in 2026. The price is well below where it was when its supposed champion Trump was elected. Over a trillion dollars in value has been lost in crypto since October.
However, stock markets had earnings squarely in focus on Monday, recovering strongly following a three-day pullback from record highs to start a week containing more Mag 7 and other big name reporting - but Friday’s scheduled Jobs Report fell victim to the shutdown with the Bureau of Labor Statistics temporarily closed.
Traders also continued to digest the nomination of Kevin Warsh to head up the Federal Reserve in May who is seen as perhaps more inclined than the other candidates to make a stand against inflation. Palantir and Samsung impressed with their earnings reports. The indexes finished nicely higher.
Software names got badly spooked on Tuesday morning by an Anthropic product release and Monday’s gains in the major indexes were instantly wiped out and things only went further downhill from there, especially for the NASDAQ as tech names were heavily pounded.
More earnings reports on Wednesday morning, with Wall Street handing out flowers to Eli Lilly but brutally punishing AMD and Novo Nordisk. The nagging doubts about AI spending and financing that had triggered Tuesday’s tech wipeout would not go away and the major indexes found it tough to mount any kind of meaningful comeback, eventually falling back again to close in the red with AI and software names once again the most damaged as the violent rotation out of 2025’s winners and into more defensive and value-oriented sectors picked up speed.
Alphabet/Google reported decent Q4 earnings after the close but announced plans to double its AI spend to a level far higher than analysts expected and Wall Street is currently fixated on capital expenditure when it comes to tech companies. The after-market took the stock lower.
Interest rates were held steady in the Euro Zone and the UK overnight on Thursday. Private surveys and government JOLTS data showed the most US layoffs since 2009, a steep decline in job openings and a jump in weekly Jobless Claims which didn’t bode well for the upcoming delayed Jobs Report.
The tech rout deepened, accelerated by earnings-driven declines from index heavyweights Google and Qualcomm. After a brief hiatus, precious metals and crypto resumed their colossal price drops. This time there was nowhere to hide and by the close there was blood red spattered everywhere across trading screens.
Any hopes that Amazon’s report after the bell would stop the pain were dashed as the week’s steady drumbeat of troubling news continued. The earnings came in largely as anticipated but traders got déjà-vu when the company announced projected expenditure that blew through expectations and the stock price crumbled.
The indexes rebounded hard on Friday despite Amazon’s meltdown as dip buyers, bottom fishers and bargain hunters seemed to decide that, for the time being at least, enough was enough and swooped in to pick up some of the most beaten-down names, driving the indexes solidly higher by the close, with the S&P 500 managing to close out the week barely changed and the more tech-light Small Caps and international stocks actually finishing with weekly gains. Even crypto and precious metals temporarily paused their relentless nosedives.
The postponed Job Report will now come out this coming Wednesday and the latest CPI inflation numbers on Friday, making the upcoming week a jumbo one for important economic data.
I was recently interviewed by Vetta-Fi who host the annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas about my practice. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
How do you stack up? The average/median net worth by age in America.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Things that have never happened before happen all the time.”
Morgan Housel, author and co-founder of The Collaborative Fund
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Walmart, Costco) ⬆︎ 5.3% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Google, Meta) ⬇︎ 3.6% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 0.2% last week, is up 1.3% so far this year and ended the week 1.0% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 2.1% last week, is up 7.7% so far this year and ended the week 2.4% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.7% last week, is up 7.4% so far this year and ended the week 0.5% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.68% (3.67% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.50% (3.52% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.76% (3.79% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.22% (4.26% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.80% (4.82% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.85% (4.87% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.10%, one month ago: 6.16%, one year ago: 6.89%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on March 18th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 77% probability (85% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 23% probability (15% a week ago)
With seven more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 63%, one month ago: 63%, one year ago: 57%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The weekend’s appalling events in Minnesota provoked Congressional maneuvering that triggered the very real risk of another federal government shutdown by the end of the week (the prediction market odds rocketed from a 9% likelihood to 80% in a matter of hours) which could toss financial markets into another economic data slop bucket.
Nevertheless, following a choppy Asian session, New York traders who made it to their posts on Monday in the wake of the winter storm carried stocks higher to within touching distance of more new all-time record highs on subdued volume to start a week dominated by Big Tech earnings and a Fed meeting.
Trump barked more threats at Canada and South Korea, but markets aren’t really listening any more as the default position now appears to be that he’s more likely than not going to backtrack on his tariff rhetoric, so why bother worrying about it?
Consumer confidence in the economy cratered to twelve-year lows and is now at levels well below where it was even in the scary early weeks of COVID, according to data released on Tuesday. Amazon and UPS announced colossal layoffs. A good number of healthcare and insurance stocks plunged as Medicare payment rates from the government were essentially frozen and United Healthcare simultaneously issued an awful earnings report and a depressing outlook.
But Wall Street shrugged off this rather miserable backdrop, seemingly betting that Congress will eventually find some kind of a shutdown off-ramp before the weekend and the indexes moved upwards again on the back of some mostly positive other (more B-list) Q4 earnings with a number of higher impact Mag 7 reports on deck for later in the week. The S&P 500 index closed at yet another all-time high.
A big Wednesday dawned with stocks adding some weight to the rally with the S&P 500 briefly breaking through 7000 at the open in advance of the Fed Funds Rate decision at 2pm ET and chairman Powell’s press conference half an hour later.
Obviously there was no rate cut with two dissents out of twelve voting members, including one from next-chairman-candidate Chris Waller, which was perceived by most observers as nothing more than a “Look at me sir, I’m doing what you asked! Please pick me!” signal to Trump.
In what ended up being a snoozer of a press conference, Powell shut down any discussion of the threats from the White House to his own position or to Fed independence in general. Stocks closed the session flat and attention quickly turned to post-closing bell Q4 earnings reports from three of the big dogs.
The bar is high when it comes to tech earnings and simply matching or even somewhat beating expectations is simply not good enough any more. While Tesla’s results were just meh, Meta meaningfully topped estimates by enough to see its stock price move higher in the aftermarket. Microsoft strongly disappointed.
Geopolitics returned to center stage on Thursday with Trump’s war threats and Iran’s aggressive response spiking oil prices. The US trade deficit widened as exports fell and imports rose despite tariffs. At least a partial government shutdown by the weekend remained very much on the table. Meta soared higher but Microsoft crashed hard and had its worst day in over five years.
The indexes took this all very badly at the open, particularly Big Tech as markets were reminded about gigantic levels of AI spending that may or may not pay off and the rising risks of ongoing circular financing in the industry.
A late bout of dip-buying limited the damage and after the bell we got Apple’s earnings. AAPL shares had fallen for eight straight weeks, the longest such losing streak since 1993 but the report was impressive, beating expectations on most metrics including record-ever global iPhone sales.
Senate Democrats and the White House appeared to be close to a deal on Thursday night to kick the shutdown can down the road, but the big news on Friday morning was Trump’s nomination of former Fed governor Kevin Warsh to succeed Powell as Fed chairman. While not Wall Street’s first choice (that was Rick Rieder), there was some relief that the awful Kevin Hassett and teacher’s pet Chris Waller were not tapped.
Stock market reaction was initially muted and interest rates didn’t do much, indicating that Wall Street was generally comfortable with the choice but also Warsh’s Senate confirmation is not yet in the bag.
However, stocks spent the rest of the session accelerating losses - once again dragged down by tech - to finish the day in the red, the week essentially unchanged but the month in the green.
Last week, the US Dollar fell to levels not seen since 2021 and a declining domestic currency makes holding overseas securities more attractive for US-based investors and the strong outperformance of international stock ETFs reflects this (including all-time record highs just last week). Also, Small Cap stocks in the US are behaving significantly better than Large Cap stocks so far this year (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below).
This all emphasizes the importance of holding a non-concentrated, sensibly diversified portfolio that goes well beyond just big US tech companies. Owning individual stocks or even nothing but a market-cap weighted S&P 500 or NASDAQ index fund is sub-optimal right now.
I was recently interviewed by Vetta-Fi who host the annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas about my practice. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“People take more risk when stocks go up and the economy is booming, and it can last surprisingly long.”The Wall Street Journal’s Jason Zweig on the importance of separating a “Mad Money” cowboy account where you screw around with speculative bets from your actual real investments.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Investors hate uncertainty. Well, that’s just tough. Uncertainty is all investors have ever gotten.”
Jason Zweig, Wall Street Journal
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy for the second week in a row (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) ⬆︎ 3.3% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson) ⬇︎ 1.7% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 0.4% last week, is up 1.5% so far this year and ended the week 0.8% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 2.0% last week, is up 5.5% so far this year and ended the week 4.4% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 0.2% last week, is up 5.6% so far this year and ended the week 2.2% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.67% (3.70% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.52% (3.60% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.79% (3.84% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.26% (4.24% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.82% (4.78% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.87% (4.82% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.09%, one month ago: 6.16%, one year ago: 6.95%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on March 18th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬌ 85% probability (85% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬌ 15% probability (15% a week ago)
With seven more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 65%, one month ago: 63%, one year ago: 61%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Trump weaponized tariffs again over the weekend but this time in order to pursue his global territorial ambitions. He proposed tariff-based sanctions on allied countries voicing concerns over a proposed illegal US annexation of Greenland, including the UK, France, Germany, the Netherlands as well as the Nordic bloc, who reacted by forcefully reiterating their “non-negotiable” support for Greenland’s fundamental right to self-determination and Denmark’s existing oversight over the territory.
US markets were closed on Monday but stocks tumbled in Europe in response to the growing Greenland s**t-show as European leaders finally showed the first hint of a backbone, weighing retaliatory tariffs on $100 billion of US goods.
Meanwhile the skies above Davos, Switzerland were swarming with private jets as the odious, self-absorbed annual gathering got under way and attendees began scoffing their caviar and lobster while bracing for Trump’s arrival on Wednesday.
Back in the real world, Wall Street aggressively dumped stocks across the board on Tuesday, driven by the apparent resumption of global tariff wars (Trump threatened a crushing 200% on French wines and, annoyingly for the Davos crowd, champagne) and a return of the “Sell America” trade as well as developments in Japan where fiscal concerns caused local long term interest rates to skyrocket to all-time highs (see .. AND I QUOTE .. below).
Stock indexes all closed substantially lower for their worst session since last April’s “Liberation Day” meltdown with Big Tech/AI names worst affected.
After the closing bell, Netflix reported decent Q4 earnings, but the market reaction was negative with continued uncertainty about the company’s spending pending the final outcome of the Warner Brothers saga and the stock extended its recent slump (down 30% over the last three months).
On Wednesday morning, Trump delivered a rambling 90-minute + speech in Davos to an audience very well-schooled in business and economic data that was filled with a lot of statistics and statements that were, shall we say, rather divergent from the truth (including the “total defeat” of US inflation, a 5%+ economic growth rate, the mathematically impossible reduction of prescription drug prices by thousands of percent, his eight solved wars etc., to name but a few).
He doubled down on the US annexation of Greenland (“it’s our territory”), mistook Iceland for Greenland four times, revived his 2020 election delusions (“prosecutions are coming”) andfloated his absurd notions of capping credit card interest rates at 10% till just after the midterms, banning institutional ownership of houses and blocking private companies in the aerospace and defense sectors from paying any dividends to shareholders.
From this smorgasbord of available narratives, Wall Street initially chose to pick up on his apparent pledge not to take Greenland by military force and stocks stabilized after Tuesday’s rout. Then, mid-afternoon, Trump unveiled his biggest and quickest TACO climbdown ever in the face of a unified resistance from Europe and the worrying reaction of financial markets, announcing that the punitive Greenland-related tariffs proposed just four days earlier would now not go into effect.
This obliterated much of the rationale for Tuesday’s heavy decline and the stock indexes roared higher to erase about two-thirds of it in the final hours of trading.
The geopolitical de-escalation recovery in stocks continued on Thursday as dip-buyers held a victory lap. The PCE report came in as expected, confirming continued sticky inflation (2.8%) and gradually slowing economic growth. The indexes closed nicely higher again although still a little short of where they were on Friday of the previous week. After hours, Intel (10% owned by the US government) disappointed with its earnings report and provided a shaky outlook. The stock price got absolutely spanked in the after-market.
A wild week came to a muted close on Friday as the recovery rally faded with Intel’s plunge stifling any further gains. By the closing bell, the indexes had barely moved, suffering their first back-to-back weekly losses since June and New York traders hurried home to prepare for the monster snowstorm.
The Fed interest rate-setting meeting this coming Wednesday will be interesting, not because it is likely to make any moves (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below), but because chairman Powell will be peppered with questions from the financial press pack about his job security and the future of Fed independence from presidential interference.
The beauty pageant that is the selection process for the role to succeed Powell as the next Fed chairman seems to be coming to a close and the odds are changing rapidly. Wall Street seems mightily relieved that Trump glove puppet Kevin Hassett’s chances appear to have collapsed and that Rick Rieder’s star is on the rise.
I was recently interviewed by Vetta-Fi who host the annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas about my practice. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Even if you definitively knew the future (impossible, of course), you would still fail to successfully time the market because you wouldn’t know how others will react, which is all that matters.
A must-read article from Ritholz’s Nick Maggiulli for anyone who thinks they can outsmart the market. TLDR: You can’t.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“What happened in Japan is a very important message to the House and to the Senate: You need to get our fiscal house in order.”
Ken Griffin, CEO of Citadel
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) ⬆︎ 3.2% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Financials (two biggest holdings: Berkshire Hathaway, JP Morgan) ⬇︎ 2.5% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 0.4% last week, is up 1.1% so far this year and ended the week 1.0% below its all-time record closing high (01/12/2026).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 0.4% last week, is up 7.6% so far this year and ended the week 1.0% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.1% last week, is up 5.4% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high.
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.70% (3.67% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.60% (3.59% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.84% (3.82% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬌ 4.24% (4.24% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.78% (4.79% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.82% (4.83% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.06%, one month ago: 6.19%, one year ago: 6.96%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on January 28th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 97% probability (96% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎3% probability (4% a week ago)
With eight rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 67%, one month ago: 61%, one year ago: 60%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Three potentially significant market-impacting stories developed over the weekend.
Firstly, Trump’s desperation to do away with Fed chairman Jerome Powell, demolish the independence of the central bank and take personal control of US interest rate policy resulted in an obvious intimidation tactic of a criminal prosecution threat. Incredibly, a haggard-looking Powell was forced onto YouTube on Sunday, vowing to stand firm against extraordinary White House political interference.
Secondly, the president outright told reporters “We are going to take Greenland” even though the US has precisely zero legal or historical basis for doing so. Such a move by military force could destroy NATO.
Thirdly, an escalation in both rhetoric and violence in Iran put to the test Trump’s recent threat to react militarily to the Iranian authorities killing protesters, something that has undoubtedly already taken place.
Wall Street was understandably spooked by this avalanche of uncertainty at the opening bell on Monday. Stocks initially pulled back from record high levels, interest rates jumped and the US Dollar dived. The financial sector was particularly rattled after Trump baselessly claimed that any credit card company charging over 10% interest (the national average is currently 21%) after Monday 20th January would be “breaking the law”.
Traders eventually turned their focus from the stream of bizarre proclamations coming from the White House to upcoming Q4 earnings and the indexes recovered to score mild gains and close at yet more new record highs. Alphabet/Google became just the fourth company to ever move above a $4 trillion valuation.
After Asian stock markets reached new all-time record highs overnight amid the announcement of a snap election in Japan, the main event in the US on Tuesday was the pre-market CPI report which showed an as-expected 2.7% annualized inflation rate, but falling prices at the gas pump masked some quite significant increases elsewhere.
The data provided a brief crumb of hope for a Fed Funds Rate cut on January 28th, but it is still considered to be a very long shot (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below). JPMorgan and Delta Airlines kicked off the earnings season but traders were unimpressed and the indexes slipped downwards, finishing near the lows of the day.
Wells Fargo, Bank of America and Citibank joined JPMorgan on Wall Street’s naughty step after earnings disappointments on Wednesday morning. We also got a pre-market PPI reading that validated the CPI inflation outlook but Retail Salescontinued to hold up.
Big Tech/AI names bore the brunt of what appeared to be an intense bout of Large Cap profit-taking with S&P 500 and NASDAQ finishing the session meaningfully lower with every Magnificent Seven stock closing in the red, but at the same time the Russell 2000 Small Cap Index scored its fourth all-time record high of the young year, emphasizing the under-the-surface rotation that seems to be taking place.
On Thursday morning, a very low weekly Jobless Claims number poured cold water on any flickering hopes of a January rate cut and interest rates spiked up again to four month highs.
Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Taiwan Semiconductor all delivered solid Q4 earnings and the major indexes finished the session back in the green with a renewed spring in their step as the somewhat shaky start to the week seemed to trigger some dip-buying of the more beaten-down names.
Stocks meandered along aimlessly on a quiet Friday in advance of a three-day weekend as a volatile week came to an end with another utterly bonkers proposal, this time teased by Fed chairmanship candidate and Trump’s grinning bootlicker-in-chief Kevin Hassett, to encourage people to empty their workplace retirement plans to buy a house.
The major indexes closed on Friday pretty much where they had opened on Monday, except for Small Caps which were considerably higher following eleven consecutive days of outperforming the big boys in the S&P 500 - the longest such streak since the late 1980s.
The events of the last couple of weeks have shown that pretty much anything is on the table for this administration when it comes to short term electoral bribes between now and the midterms. Investors need to be braced for a “flood the zone”strategy of wave after wave of outlandish populist proposals in the lead-up to November 3rd, many (but not all) of which may well be just mindless rhetoric and constitutionally unachievable.
The relative lack of market reaction to all this preposterous blather, as well as to the now open warfare between the president and the central bank, seems to be emboldening Trump. So far, financial markets are treating it all as just political theater but at some point (maybe this week at the repulsive and out-of-touch orgy of self-congratulation, brown-nosing and performative b**t in Davos?), the ambiguity and recklessness of many of these Soviet-style interventionist schemes will likely take their toll with potentially damaging consequences for risk assets and, while we’re not there yet, we may well be getting closer.
I was recently interviewed by Vetta-Fi who host the annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas about my practice. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“If the home you live in goes from $200k to $1m, you are not wealthy, because the replacement home also costs $1m. You are trapped.”
Ritholtz’s Nick Maggiulli asks, Is Home Equity Fake Wealth?
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“An unprecedented attempt to use prosecutorial attacks to undermine [Federal Reserve] independence”.
Eleven ex-Treasury Secretaries, past Fed chairs and top economists in a joint statement describing last week’s threatened criminal probe into Fed chairman Powell.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Welltower, Prologis) ⬆︎ 4.2% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Google, Meta) ⬇︎ 2.3% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 0.4% last week, is up 1.4% so far this year and ended the week 0.6% below its all-time record closing high (01/12/2026)
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 2.1% last week, is up 8.0% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high.
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.0% last week, is up 4.2% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high.
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.67% (3.62% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.59% (3.54% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.82% (3.75% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.24% (4.18% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.79% (4.76% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.83% (4.82% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.16%, one month ago: 6.21%, one year ago: 7.04%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on January 28th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬌ 96% probability (96% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬌ 4% probability (4% a week ago)
With eight rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 64%, one month ago: 60%, one year ago: 58%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The weekend newswires were obviously dominated by the abduction of Nicolas Maduro and his wife during a large-scale deadly US military attack on Venezuela. Trump bizarrely declared US remote sovereignty over thecountrythat supposedly has the world’s largest oil reserves, with zero detail about how this would be accomplished but also refusing to rule out the deployment of American troops on the ground.
It was also heavily implied that either Cuba, Colombia, Mexico or Greenland could be the next cab off the rank for similar treatment.
As stock traders got back to the grind after the holidays on Monday, Asian and European markets and even the oil price mostly shrugged off the weekend’s events and US stocks sprang higher at the open, led by energy names who stand to potentially benefit from developments in Venezuela and tech names with the kick-off in Las Vegas of the annual CES, a kind of battleground for chipmakers and designers to announce and show off their sexy new products. But a late-arriving Santa Claus had gifts for most of the risk-on sectors and the indexes closed the session solidly higher on much improved volume.
Stocks opened in a more muted fashion on Tuesday morning but quickly picked up steam as the session wore on. The gains seemed to be simply momentum-based as there was no real news, data or a specific catalyst for the rise in the indexes, but the S&P 500 still reached its first new all-time record high of the year, creeping ever closer to the 7,000 mark.
Wednesday saw heavily-outdated JOLTS data indicating an expected decline in job openings, an also-anticipated drop in Durable Goods orders as well as flashpoints in international waters as the US military ran around seizing Venezuela-linked oil tankers, including an empty Russian one.
Stocks continued higher at a more cautious pace but a late day swoon ended the three-day winning streak after Trump went on an out-of-left-field social media blitz to signal a ban on large investors from buying homes, forced taxpayer purchase of mortgage bonds and aerospace and defense companies (think GE, Lockheed Martin, possibly even Boeing) to no longer be allowed to issue dividends to shareholders while at the same time advocating for sky-high, deficit-busting levels of more than half a trillion dollars of increased defense spending.
This slew of outlandish interventionist policy proclamations continued to weigh on enthusiasm on Thursday and the stock indexes basically spent the session treading water but with a somewhat noticeable rotation out of the Magnificent Seven into Small Cap stocks with the Russell 2000 Small Cap Index achieving a new all-time record high.
We finally got to see a cleaner Jobs Report pre-market on Friday after recent data contamination due to the shutdown which showed a lackluster level of new job creation but a drop in the unemployment rate to below 4.4%. As a result, the odds of a January 28th cut in the Fed Funds Rate tumbled to negligible levels (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below).
Stock indexes moved steadily higher and deeper into record territory, once again led by Small Caps, bringing to an end an exhausting but price-positive week with the anticipation of the Q4 earnings season kicking off in the coming days.
I don’t usually focus on individual names in this report, but here’s a pop quiz .. Where do you think Nvidia’s returns in 2025 ranked among the stocks in the S&P 500 index?.. The answer might surprise many, Nvidia was actually only the 75th best performer out of the 500 (#1 was SanDisk), but it was the biggest contributor to the positive performance of the index (and thereby to S&P 500-tracking ETFs and mutual funds) due to its high weighting (almost 8% of the entire index).
As a group, all of the Magnificent Seven stocks outperformed the S&P 500 index in 2023, six of them did in 2024 but just two of them did in 2025.
The fact is that Nvidia’s stock price has been in the doldrums since late October and remains 10% lower than it was back then on capital spending concerns, while the S&P 500 has traded at multiple new all-time highs in that time, including again just last week.
The bar for further large gains in Nvidia’s price is high but among other components of the S&P 500 index and others (including international indexes), there appear to be plenty of stocks (Google, AMD and a collection of overseas companies, for example) willing to pick up Nvidia’s slack.
So, yet again, we see the overwhelming argument for holding thousands of different stocks across multiple geographies, sectors and capitalizations using ETFs rather than concentrating your bets by selectively picking just a handful of names, bets you will likely lose.
I was recently interviewed by Vetta-Fi who host the annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas about my practice. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Prediction platforms are enabling bets on everything from who’ll be the next Fed chairman to will Zelensky wear a suit, from the World Cup winner to the timing of a second coming of Jesus Christ. But there are significant questions about access, integrity and regulation.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“We think people are sleeping on the macro risks — and [Venezuela] is a macro risk we didn’t even see.”
Christopher Harvey, Head of equity and portfolio strategy, CIBC Capital Markets
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) ⬆︎ 5.1% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Constellation) ⬇︎ 1.6% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.6% last week, is up 1.7% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 4.6% last week, is up 5.7% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high.
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.7% last week, is up 3.2% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high.
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.62% (3.65% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.54% (3.47% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.75% (3.74% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.18% (4.19% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.76% (4.81% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.82% (4.86% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.15%, one month ago: 6.21%, one year ago: 6.93%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on January 28th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 96% probability (83% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 4% probability (17% a week ago)
With eight rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 59%, one month ago: 56%, one year ago: 55%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Another holiday-shortened week began with Trump holding an apparently chummy meeting in Florida with Zelensky followed by a cozy phone call with Putin, but the desperate PR spin from all sides afterwards was unable to mask the reality that a workable peace deal is still well out of reach.
Stocks retreated further on Monday from their Xmas Eve record highs on pitiful trading volume on the back of some year-end profit-taking as niggling doubts persisted about AI company valuations and the ultimate projected rate of return on their gigantic levels of spending. Interest rates inched higher.
The penultimate trading day of the year on Tuesday saw a churn to nowhere for stocks. The release of the minutes from the most recent Fed rate-setting meeting that voted to cut by 0.25% indicated a divided committee with a number of members clearly open to changing their minds and their votes depending on upcoming economic data. Some Big Tech/AI names recovered a little but the session was a low volume snooze-fest with the indexes barely moving.
Stocks exited 2025 with a whimper on Wednesday, slipping lower over the course of another lethargic session.
For the calendar year, the S&P 500 was up ~17%, its sixth year of 15%+ gains in the past seven and ended close to its all-time record high. The NASDAQ was up ~20%, but international markets (developed and emerging combined) outperformed the US for the first time in years with an aggregated ~30% increase in 2025.
Peru was the world’s best-performing stock market in dollar terms through late December 2025 (+88%) and the worst was Saudi Arabia (-7%).
The US (as represented by the S&P 500) finished in 39th place out of the 51 countries and regions studied in terms of stock market performance.
The new trading year kicked off on Friday with international stocks off to the races again but US equities slumbered through another dreary low-volume session. A renewed bout of TACO broke out with a number of selected tariffs getting delayed or diluted, something we can expect to see more of in a mid-term election year. The US indexes closed the day mixed and down for the week.
Wall Street is unanimously bullish on the year ahead, despite the fact that historical data shows generally less-than-impressive average returns in the year following previous strong three-year runs like the one we have just experienced, which has generated an ~84% return so far in the S&P 500 since the October 2022 bottom.
In last week’s report I referenced two of the pillars upon which the rally has been primarily built; a high level of AI enthusiasm and a strong expectation of imminent multiple Fed Funds Rate cuts - both of which could possibly be on the wane as we enter 2026.
There are two other major pillars; stable economic and earnings growth and tariff clarity.
Stable economic growth did a lot of the heavy lifting in 2025 as Wall Street was constantly surprised by how under control inflation appeared to be, how orderly the decline in the labor market has been and how well particularly high-end consumer spending held up, bolstering corporate earnings.
This could all change if the unemployment rate moves sustainably above 5% (currently 4.6%), inflation (currently 2.8%) shifts to the mid-3% range or higher and/or top-earning consumers start pulling back on spending.
A major component of tariff clarity will come any day now when the Supreme Court finally rules on the legality of the emergency powers-contingent IEEPA tariffs, the type used for most of the levy impositions so far. Should the court strike them down, there could be chaos as US companies seek refunds/credits on what they have already paid and the administration will be forced to pivot to other tariff types like Section 232 or Section 301.
2026 also promises a revamped Federal Reserve led by a spineless Trump yes-man, a probably nasty midterm election campaign likely to result in a divided Congress, continued geopolitical volatility, upside and downside economic data surprises, new themes and paradigms and a whole collection of bombshells that we cannot even conceive of yet.
I’ll do my best to keep you updated and informed each week as these all play out.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Some might argue that [an investment’s performance relative to the broad market] is all that matters, but I disagree.”
Ritholtz’s Nick Maggiulli on why beta > alpha and mathematical proof that indexing works better than than trying to find market-beating stocks.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Choice can be a tax, not a benefit. Consumers don’t want more choices; they want more confidence in the choices presented.”
Scott Galloway
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) ⬆︎ 3.3% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) ⬇︎ 3.0% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 1.0% last week and ended the week 1.2% below its all-time record closing high (12/24/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 1.1% last week and ended the week 3.7% below its all-time record closing high (12/10/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 0.9% last week and ended the week at its all-time record closing high.
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.65% (3.64% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.47% (3.46% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.74% (3.68% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.19% (4.14% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.81% (4.76% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.86% (4.81% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.18%, one month ago: 6.20%, one year ago: 6.91%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on January 28th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 83% probability (82% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 17% probability (18% a week ago)
With eight rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 60%, one month ago: 58%, one year ago: 55%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The stock market was starting to run out of ammunition when it came to any meaningful remaining economic data releases this year with just PCE inflation and GDP to come and any Santa Claus rally would have to be built mainly on vibes. It would also be subject to geopolitical winds which don’t look great (Venezuela, Ukraine, Middle East) as well as the volatility that can often result from thin holiday markets and lightly-populated trading desks.
The three-and-a-half day week began positively on Monday following the previous week’s surprise drop in inflation and lukewarm US labor market data keeping a January Fed Funds Rate cut at least on the table. After an as-expected 2.8% PCE inflation reading pretty much confirming the previous week’s CPI numbers, the stock indexes made a charge to try to squeeze in some more record highs before the ball drops on New Year’s Eve, closing higher and back into the green for the month of December, just shy of their goal.
An extraordinary GDP print premarket on Tuesday showed a 4.3% growth estimate for Q3, a two-year high which blew through expectations, although it was tempered by the inclusion in the data of a tactical and temporary acceleration of economic activity during the quarter with companies and consumers trying to get ahead of tariffs.
In this good-news-is-bad-news environment, markets were briefly unnerved by this strong argument against the need for more Fed rate cuts and the market-driven probability of a January reduction fell sharply (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below).
The stock rally initially stalled but the indexes soon found their feet in super-low-volume trading and the quest for more new all-time highs resumed and proved ultimately successful in the case of the S&P 500 which closed at a new record.
Defying Trump’s attempts to shut them down, US financial markets were open for a half-day on Wednesday and stocks got back to work marching deeper into record territory on scant volume with the S&P 500 index scoring its 39th all-time high of the year and a first on a Xmas Eve since 2013 when its price reached the giddy heights of 1,833. It is now closing in on 7,000.
With most major international markets closed, New York traders who did decide to show up at their posts on Friday spent a deathly-quiet session (the lowest volume trading day of 2025) with half an eye on the weather forecast, with the North-East bracing for a brutal dumping of snow. Predictably, stocks went nowhere to close out what was still a solid week for the indexes.
The reality is that two of the most important pillars of the now-three-year+ rally in stock prices (during which time the S&P 500 has increased by over 80%), AI enthusiasm and strongly-expected Fed rate cuts, may not necessarily be firmly in place as we move into 2026.
However, with a buoyant GDP, jobs still being created every month, the higher-earning American consumer continuing to spend hard, inflation stable (even though it remains above the Fed’s target) and ongoing cheery corporate earnings, the current odds of a recession in 2026 are no higher than the historical norm (they are never zero).
Having said that, given midterm elections, the uncertain geopolitical landscape and Trump’s habit of routinely lobbing Molotov cocktails into the mix, I think that a degree of unpredictable economic disorder next year can safely be assumed.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The case for the commonly-held idea that we are in a soon-to-pop AI bubble relies heavily on the precedent of the tech crash in 2000. Here’s an argument for why that may well be a flawed premise and the fears might possibly be unfounded.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Respect the trend, but don’t ignore the risks.”
Cameron Dawson, chief investment officer at NewEdge Wealth
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Newmont) ⬆︎ 1.0% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Walmart, Costco) ⬆︎ 0.4% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.4% last week, is up 17.8% so far this year and ended the week 0.2% below its all-time record closing high (12/24/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 0.3% last week, is up 13.8% so far this year and ended the week 2.6% below its all-time record closing high (12/10/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.6% last week, is up 28.7% so far this year and ended the week 0.5% below its all-time record closing high (12/24/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.64% (3.62% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.46% (3.48% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.68% (3.70% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.14% (4.16% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.76% (4.77% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.81% (4.82% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.21%, one month ago: 6.25%, one year ago: 6.85%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on January 28th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 82% probability (78% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 18% probability (22% a week ago)
With eight rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts next year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 58%, one month ago: 58%, one year ago: 60%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The last full trading week of 2025 followed a weekend which saw a temporary spike in the odds on the “other Kevin”, Warsh, being nominated by Trump as the next Fed chairman at the expense of Hassett whose potential chairmanship has not been well received by markets due to the perception that he could put the economy at risk by being so clearly deep in the president’s pocket.
Stocks steadied on Monday after the previous Friday’s tech rout as analysts kept up a somewhat optimistic drumbeat in their 2026 index projections but, again, more ho-hum “old school” names and smaller companies behaved better than Big Tech/AI with the ongoing intense punishment of index heavyweights Oracle and Broadcom generating continued AI fatigue which infected other stocks in the sector. It is interesting to note that five of the Magnificent Seven stocks have failed to match the returns of the S&P 500 index this year.
By the closing bell, the S&P 500 was little changed but the NASDAQ was definitely lower. Interest rates inched higher and crypto began to tumble again, with Bitcoin firmly heading towards the fourth down-year in the last eleven, despite the touted tailwinds of its supposed maturity, mass adoption, ETFs and a champion in Trump.
On Tuesday, we got a delayed double Jobs Report for both October and November and it showed job creation pretty much as expected but an unemployment rate ticking up to 4.6%. For financial markets, bad labor market news is generally good news for stocks as deteriorating conditions encourage the Fed rate cut case, but this particular data set was hard to interpret with distortions due to the shutdown and federal workforce restructuring. We also saw Retail Sales numbers which were basically unchanged.
As a result, there was a muted reaction with a negative lean from stocks with attention quickly shifting to potentially more insightful data on the inflation front on Thursday. The indexes closed the session mixed with the S&P 500 slightly down but a late-day pickup in tech stocks carried the NASDAQ lightly into the green.
Ongoing AI skepticism kicked back in on Wednesday and once again it was the darlings of 2025 that led the indexes substantially lower as the butchering of Oracle and Broadcom resumed with big-daddy Nvidia getting pulled into the bloodbath.
The decline was also fueled by potential negotiation breakdowns over Ukraine and US health insurance premium subsidies as well as spiking oil prices caused by rising tensions around Venezuela.
Premarket on Thursday, a delayed CPI release showed a cooler-than-expected 2.7% retail inflation rate, giving the Fed a very bright green light to continue cutting rates. Despite significant caveats and concerns about the reliability of the report given shutdown-related data collection challenges and a lack of context given the fact that there was no October release, Wall Street was giddy with excitement.
Stock indexes soared and interest rates dived. The beaten-down NASDAQ and the interest-rate-sensitive small company universe were the main beneficiaries of the rush to buy.
Overnight, the Japanese central bank raised local interest rates to a three-decade high, unnerving bond traders around the world and bringing Thursday’s fall in US interest rates to a quick halt. However, when stock traders reconvened in New York on Friday (which was a Quadruple Witching Day), they took up right where they left off and carried the indexes solidly higher again with the tech-heavy NASDAQ leading the way once more, as dip-buyers emerged to scoop up some of the more battered names like Oracle, Broadcom and the rest.
I’m sorry to keep banging on about this, but I cannot emphasize it enough, especially after a week in which so much misinformation was being spread in the media (and on the likes of Fin-Tok FFS!) after the inflation numbers on Thursday.
No matter what this administration or the Kevin Hassetts of this world tell you, the Federal Reserve does NOT have the ability to lower the 10 year Treasury interest rate, upon which mortgage and other loan rates depend.
This rate is entirely determined by massive institutional bond traders, some of whom are considered to be vigilantes who may well have a tendency to sell bonds and thereby raise interest rates if they see what they view as irresponsible economic and fiscal policy combined with limited or no growth and/or elevated levels of inflation.
Case in point, since the Fed started cutting towards the tail end of 2024, the overnight Fed Funds Rate has been pushed down from 5.375% to 3.625% whereas the impactful 10 year Treasury rate is essentially no different now than it was then and actually moved higher following the most recent Fed rate cut just a week and a half ago.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
In bonds, many investors think they have a risk-free asset and are surprised when it turns out not to be. Understand your bond holdings.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Diversification is an explicit recognition of ignorance. And I view diversification not only as a survival strategy but as an aggressive strategy, because the next windfall might come from a surprising place. I want to make sure I’m exposed to it.”
Peter Bernstein, author, financial historian and economic consultant
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Tesla, Amazon) ⬆︎ 1.0% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) ⬇︎ 3.0% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 0.2% last week, is up 16.1% so far this year and ended the week 1.3% below its all-time record closing high (12/11/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 1.2% last week, is up 13.5% so far this year and ended the week 2.9% below its all-time record closing high (12/10/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price fell 1.2% last week, is up 26.7% so far this year and ended the week 2.1% below its all-time record closing high (12/11/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.62% (3.63% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.48% (3.52% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.70% (3.75% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.16% (4.19% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.77% (4.82% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.82% (4.85% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.22%, one month ago: 6.25%, one year ago: 6.72%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on January 28th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 78% probability (76% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 22% probability (24% a week ago)
With eight rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts next year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 62%, one month ago: 51%, one year ago: 52%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The major highlight of the week was always going to be the final Federal Reserve meeting of the year and the Fed Funds Rate decision announcement with quarterly dot plots, followed by chairman Powell’s press conference on Wednesday afternoon ET, with the expected rate cut proclamation itself probably the least interesting part of the day.
The central bank’s rate-setting committee (FOMC) has forever claimed to be highly data-dependent but was data-deprived due to the backlog of inflation and labor market reports resulting from the recent government shutdown and operating in a fog to an extent, but still strongly fancied to make another 0.25% rate cut.
With the delayed most recent Jobs Report not out until later this week, there could be two very different scenarios whereby next weekend Fed committee members are either patting themselves on the back or kicking themselves, already regretting what they have done.
Bond markets continued to be twitchy. Medium and longer term interest rates remained stubbornly higher as bond vigilantes appear to be stirring in reaction to the increasingly disturbing economic, fiscal and inflation outlook, the prospect of an ever-widening national debt and a potentially reckless and incompetent Fed 2.0 response under a Hassett chairmanship starting in May. Also, the odds of another government shutdown as soon as January 31st are non-trivialand Wall Street is starting to pay attention.
All this uneasiness spilled over into stocks when New York opened on Monday as attention drifted from how the Fed will behave on Wednesday (that was pretty much a given and already priced in) to how it might behave in 2026 and the indexes slipped into the red, further delaying any Santa Claus rally and then remained in a holding pattern for the rest of the session to close a touch lower.
As the FOMC began its two-day conclave on Tuesday, interest rates steadied and stocks initially made small gains after better-than-anticipated job openings JOLTS data for October before later drifting back and finishing the day unchanged.
Fed Day dawned on Wednesday with stocks still feeling soggy and medium/longer term interest rates starting to creep higher again, despite the assumed overnight rate cut later that day. The impactful 10 year Treasury rate, below 4.00% just a couple of weeks earlier, briefly climbed back above 4.20%.
The predictable quarter point cut in the Fed Funds Rate to 3.625% duly arrived with two of the twelve committee members voting for no rate cut at all. The dot plots indicated a median assumption of just one rate cut in all of 2026. They also forecast little change in CPI inflation over the next twelve months, expected to still remain well above the Fed’s 2% target and a light increase in both the unemployment rate and GDP.
In his press conference, Powell implied that the Fed felt that it had got to a kind of sweet spot, having done enough with three cuts this year to bolster the economy and defend against labor market weakness while leaving rates high enough to combat a nasty rise in inflation.
Wall Street was impressed and the indexes closed nicely higher, led by interest rate-sensitive small caps and the Russell 2000 Small Cap Index reached a new all-time record high. Shorter term interest rates pulled back a little but longer term rates continued to shift doggedly higher.
Despite the Fed decision, the global trend of lowering interest rates appears to be grinding to a halt. Central banks in Europe, Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are all expected to keep their rates unchanged or even raise them in early 2026.
The healthy vibes were quickly dealt a blow after the close with Oracle’s report showing exploding expenditure and a bad miss on Q3 revenue estimates and the share price crapped out in the after-market. The punishment got worse when the real markets opened on Thursday, badly infecting other AI giant names (and massively-weighted index fund components) like Nvidia and Broadcom and throwing cold water on the initial performance of the large cap indexes which opened weaker despite encouraging weekly Jobless Claims figures.
But that only served to trigger the dip-buying cavalry who rode to the rescue of almost everything (except Oracle and Broadcom) to propel the S&P 500 to another new all-time high by the closing bell.
But Friday turned into a rout for Big Tech and especially highly-valued AI stocks as we saw clear signs of a profit-taking rotation away from this year’s big winners. Oracle and Broadcom continued to get brutalized and the pain spread to the likes of AI heavyweights such as Nvidia, CoreWeave and AMD. Inevitably this led to a hefty index plunge, especially the NASDAQ which closed out a rather dismal week getting particularly pounded.
Concerns are growing about “circular funding” in AI-world. Simply put, these firms are saying to each other: “if you buy my products, I’ll buy your stock (financed by issuing bond debt) so that you can buy more of my products”. You don’t need to be a financial whiz to see how this could all end in tears.
Check out the Angles homepage for my new explainers on workplace benefits, new 401k/IRA contribution limits and tax brackets, HSAs, FSAs, BackDoor IRA and Mega BackDoor 401k contributions - all freshly updated for 2026.
You can download my guide to all the important 2026 numbers here:
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
An impossible task. 500 companies. 11 sectors. Trillions of dollars in market value. An uncertain world. Yet every December hundreds of Wall Street analysts try to imagine where the S&P 500 will be at the end of next year and actually publish their guesses so that we can all mock them when they inevitably get it all wrong. Given their poor track record, it’s unclear why they bother.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“The cover of Forbes magazine does not celebrate poor investors who made good decisions but happened to experience the unfortunate side of risk. But it almost certainly celebrates rich investors who made OK or even reckless decisions and happened to get lucky. Both flipped the same coin that happened to land on a different side.”
Morgan Housel, author and co-founder of the Collaborative Fund
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Newmont) ⬆︎ 2.4% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Nvidia, Apple) ⬇︎ 2.0% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 0.6% last week, is up 16.3% so far this year and ended the week 1.2% below its all-time record closing high (12/11/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 1.2% last week, is up 14.9% so far this year and ended the week 1.7% below its all-time record closing high (12/10/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 0.3% last week, is up 28.3% so far this year and ended the week 0.8% below its all-time record closing high (12/11/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS RATE * ⬇︎ 3.625% (0.25% down from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬇︎ 6.75% (0.25% down from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.63% (3.71% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.52% (3.56% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.75% (3.72% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.19% (4.15% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.82% (4.75% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.85% (4.79% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.19%, one month ago: 6.23%, one year ago: 6.60%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on January 28th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 76% probability (65% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 24% probability (35% a week ago)
With eight rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts next year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 60%, one month ago: 58%, one year ago: 65%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
After seven straight months of S&P 500 gains for the first time since 2021 carrying the index back to within 1% of more new all-time highs, solid Black Friday sales and Chat GPT’s third birthday with the Mag 7 names up a collective 300% in that time, markets began December in risk-off mode with profit-taking in vogue.
Cryptocurrencies resumed their brutal plunge on Monday as the Chinese central bank warned against speculation, pulling crypto-related stocks down. The NASDAQ led stocks lower with Big Tech/AI under pressure again. The session ended with blood red across the board for equities and interest rates jumping higher, partly driven by significant rate rises in Japan to their highest levels there since 2008 and partly on growing Kevin Hassett concerns (see below).
A degree of calm returned to markets on Tuesday. Stocks drifted around in a narrow range for most of the day, closing marginally higher. The crypto destroyers took a day off and interest rates stabilized. It was still unclear if stock traders are truly having second thoughts about a traditional Santa Claus rally or whether they are just perhaps biding their time until later in the month.
Stocks marched north on Wednesday led by Small Caps and the indexes closed in the green again after the ADP employment report indicated continued weakness in the labor market in a relatively low hire/low fire environment, pretty much erasing any lingering doubts about a third Fed Funds Rate cut of the year later this week, albeit with an expected number of dissenting committee members.
The slightly better-than-anticipated pre-market weeklyJobless Claims report on Thursday still did little to challenge the narrative of labor market deterioration and resulting high confidence in a December rate cut. Stocks essentially flatlined all day, closing unchanged.
On what should have been a Jobs Report Friday (the most updated report now won’t be released until December 16th), all we got was a stale shutdown-delayed PCE inflation report for September. The out-of-date info implied an unchanged inflation rate stuck at around 3% which doesn’t hurt the chances of a Fed rate cut this week but could make more cuts in 2026 trickier as inflation is showing no signs of falling to anywhere near the Fed’s target rate of 2%.
A fourth straight day of gains saw the S&P 500 flirting with more new all-time record highs, but closed out the week just a little shy of the mark.
Bitcoin finally seemed to briefly attract some dip-buying last week after a frightful month. While definitely not a leading indicator for stocks, cryptocurrencies do trade pretty much exclusively on speculative money flows since the entire investment case for owning them is simply because you think someone else will pay more tomorrow than you did today. This differentiates the asset class from stocks which have actual measurable earnings and tangible value. So, while speculators will exit crypto well before stocks, an extended Bitcoin breakdown could be an early warning sign of a broader falling risk appetite. There are also early signs in last week’s rising interest rates (see INTEREST RATES below) that the bond markets are becoming wary that the assumed next Federal Reserve chairman Kevin Hassett may prove to be a spineless Trump glove puppet with a mission to demolish Fed independence from political pressure and advocate for relentless rate cuts on the instruction of the president, regardless of macro-economic and inflationary considerations.
He is already shamelessly lying to the public as part of his job audition, claiming on CBS last week that there are a number of states where average gas prices are below $2.00 per gallon. This is not even close to true and he knows it. According to the most recent official statistics, $2.41 is the lowest in the nation and the national average is $3.00. It was clearly part of a clumsy but deliberate attempt to mislead Americans when it comes to the inflation story.
Leading the US central bank requires really, really good judgement, a high level of trustworthiness, a grasp of real-world economic concerns, a passion for Fed independence and, most importantly, market credibility, respect and gravitas. Current chairman Powell has an abundance of all those qualities, but with Hassett we get literally none of them.
Bond traders will have their say on this one day and a substantial increase in medium and longer term interest rates could easily be the result even with a Fed that stubbornly pushes its own overnight lending rate lower and lower. Watch this space.
Check out the Angles homepage for my new explainers on workplace benefits, new 401k/IRA contribution limits and tax brackets, HSAs, FSAs, BackDoor IRA and Mega BackDoor 401k contributions - all freshly updated for 2026.
You can download my guide to all the important 2026 numbers here:
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Why smart investors choose not to play Wall Street’s active management game. It’s staggeringly simple.
There are really only two reasons why you would want to play the game ..
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Volatility is like a toll that investors pay on the road to attractive long-term returns.”
Jeff Buchbinder, LPL Financial chief equity strategist
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Nvidia, Microsoft) ⬆︎ 2.4% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Constellation Energy) ⬇︎ 4.5% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 0.3% last week, is up 17.0% so far this year and ended the week 0.6% below its all-time record closing high (10/29/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 0.8% last week, is up 13.5% so far this year and ended the week 0.8% below its all-time record closing high (10/15/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 0.6% last week, is up 27.9% so far this year and ended the week 0.7% below its all-time record closing high (11/12/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬌ 3.875% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 7.00% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.71% (3.88% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.56% (3.47% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.72% (3.59% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.15% (4.02% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.75% (4.62% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.79% (4.67% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.23%, one month ago: 6.19%, one year ago: 6.69%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the final rate-setting meeting of the year on December 10th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 13% probability (14% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 87% probability (86% a week ago)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 60%, one month ago: 52%, one year ago: 67%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
As a rough November moved into the home stretch, the mood brightened for stocks as a holiday-shortened but data-packed week kicked off on Monday following a quiet weekend on the newswires.
A sense that there may be some relative bargains to be found in certain names among the rubble of Tech/AI after the recent bloodletting and rapidly rising hopes of another Fed Funds Rate cut next month pushed the indexes higher at the open. They then kept chugging forward as the day went on with the tech-heavy NASDAQ leading the way, in particular on the back of an outstanding session for both Broadcom and Google, the latter now having added a trillion dollars to its value in less than a month.
There was a big pre-market data dump on Tuesday although a good deal of it was already out-of date due to the shutdown. Retail Sales for September disappointed and PPI picked up in September from its August level, reflecting higher energy and food costs. Consumer confidence in how the economy is doing continues to nosedive according to the latest survey. There were also a bunch of smaller, more B-list retailers who released their earnings which were mixed, but appeared to confirm the developing K-Shaped economy narrative.
The overall gut-check from all this data was that a Fed Funds Rate cut on December 10th was becoming more likely but the major indexes initially struggled to get off the ground since their largest component stock, Nvidia, got slammed as Google appears to be showing signs of success in eating its lunch.
According to reports on Tuesday, Kevin Hassett is emerging as the front runner to succeed Powell as Fed chairman next year. Hassett is a loyal Trump foot-soldier with zero Federal Reserve experience, who in 2018 said that “US tax law was written by someone on acid” and would obediently and vigorously advocate for rate cuts on the instruction of the president.
Stocks responded positively to close nicely in the green on typical holiday-week low volume and interest rates sank with the 10 year Treasury rate (which has the greatest impact on mortgage rates) briefly dipping below 4.00%.
The buy Google/sell Nvidia trade finally eased on November’s final full day of trading on Wednesday and the indexes continued their recovery in the low volume environment. The Durable Goods and Weekly Jobless Claims reports were not particularly dial-movers, but the market-driven odds of a December Fed Funds Rate cut soared to 86% by the close, up from a low of 35% just a week earlier (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below).
Stock markets went into the Thanksgiving holiday riding their best four-day winning streak for months and the S&P 500 up over 16% for the year. But it’s really important to note that the index has its very own K-Shaped economy going on under the hood with more than a third of its component stocks down 20% or more from their 2025 highs with the ten largest names (2% of the stocks in the index representing 40%+ of the weighting) doing all the heavy lifting until recently in terms of the positive annual index performance.
Turkey-stuffed stock traders returned to their posts early for an abbreviated three-and-a-half hour session on Friday and were immediately confronted with a major CME futures exchange outage that was thankfully fixed by the cash market open. They carried stocks higher again on microscopic volume to complete their best Thanksgiving week performance since 2008.
Having been down 4.5% at one point just eight days earlier, the S&P 500 finished the month slightly in the green and new all time-record highs were back in view, heading into Santa Claus rally-time. Interestingly, there were no big tech sector names anywhere to be seen in November’s top ten performing stocks, bucking the trend of the year so far.
Financial markets will likely face the following questions in December:
Is AI enthusiasm shifting to AI skepticism?
Does the Fed either announce a pause in rate cuts in December or dampen hopes for continued cuts in early 2026?
Will backlogged economic data indicate a weaker-than-expected economy?
Will the Supreme Court’s tariff decision inject fresh uncertainty into the economy?
The answers to these questions will determine how things shake out in the remaining weeks of 2025.
Check out the Angles homepage for my new explainers on workplace benefits, new 401k/IRA contribution limits and tax brackets, HSAs, FSAs, BackDoor IRA and Mega BackDoor 401k contributions - all freshly updated for 2026.
You can download my guide to all the important numbers for 2026 here:
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“A home can be an important asset. But it can also be a bad financial investment, especially for the young.” Want to Buy a Home? It’s OK to Wait Till You’re 40by Allison Schrager of Bloomberg.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Home buyers and sellers are living in different worlds now.”
Chen Zhao, head of economics research at Redfin
Home-sellers in the US are yanking listings off the market as the real estate sector stagnates. Nearly 85k sellers removed their properties in September alone.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) ⬆︎ 4.9% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) ⬆︎ 1.2% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 3.7% last week, is up 16.6% so far this year and ended the week 0.9% below its all-time record closing high (10/29/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 5.6% last week, is up 12.6% so far this year and ended the week 1.6% below its all-time record closing high (10/15/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 2.8% last week, is up 27.2% so far this year and ended the week 1.3% below its all-time record closing high (11/12/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬌ 3.875% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 7.00% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.88% (3.90% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.47% (3.51% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.59% (3.62% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.02% (4.06% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.62% (4.67% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.67% (4.71% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.26%, one month ago: 6.18%, one year ago: 6.81%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the final rate-setting meeting of the year on December 10th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 14% probability (31% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 86% probability (69% a week ago)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 53%, one month ago: 60%, one year ago: 75%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Well, I did warn you with my closing line of last week’s recap.
The biggest news story of an otherwise generally quiet weekend was that, barely a month after reaching an all-time high, Bitcoin collapsed into free-fall and erased its entire gain for the year in the latest crypto massacre.
Wall Street began a week of important earnings and a long-overdue September Jobs Report in a cautious mood on Monday, with more institutional funds announcing a full sale of all their Nvidia holdings but others (including Warren Buffet’s) intending to raise their stakes in Google and Apple.
After initial indecision, stocks eventually settled on a downward trajectory and then leaned heavily into the decline with the bulls mostly paralyzed, wary of making any big bets ahead of earnings from Nvidia and the retail giants.
This sudden overall drop in risk appetite in the US, which included the ongoing crypto bloodbath, gave Asian markets the jitters on Tuesday, exacerbated by a China/Japan diplomatic spat and local stocks got brutalized. European stocks quickly followed suit and the downdraft continued into New York, with a miserable pre-market earnings report from Home Depot adding fuel to the fire.
It seemed like it was going to be another frightful session with continued and increasingly alarming signs of exhaustion from Mega Cap Tech/AI until early afternoon when bargain-hunting dip-buyers arrived for a brief cameo to at least pull the indexes up from their lows, but we still suffered a fourth straight day of losses in stocks.
Markets largely stabilized across Asia and Europe on Wednesday and as Nvidia Day dawned in the US, traders prepped for the after-market big reveal by digesting another disappointing pre-market retail earnings report, this time from Target, but better than expected results from Lowe’s.
The minutes from the most recent Fed interest rate-setting meeting showed that “many” committee members saw a December cut as “inappropriate”. Nevertheless, stocks seemed somewhat reinvigorated by more dip-buyers placing bets on the possibility of a juicy Nvidia report and gained a little over the course of the session to end the losing streak.
When it arrived, the report blew away even the most lofty of Wall Street’s sky-high expectations with sensational revenue, earnings (profits up 65% from a year ago) and forecasts and Nvidia’s stock, 10% cheaper than it was three weeks earlier, was gobbled up in the after-market and ripped higher.
There was another strong earnings report pre-market on Thursday, from Walmart this time, but we also got a stale September Jobs Report which proved mixed, with much higher job gains than expected but worrying downward revisions to previous months’ data and a tick-up in the unemployment rate, leaving the Fed Funds Rate cut picture still cloudy.
Wall Street began the session with a renewed spring in its step with Nvidia and Walmart initially rewarded for their outstanding reports which helped to pull the indexes higher.
But sentiment turned suddenly and sharply ugly and the early gains quickly dissolved and turned into significant losses as anxieties resurfaced about AI spending commitments vs. tangible benefits as well as elevated tech stock valuations. Things heating up in and around Venezuela didn’t help.
The crypto crap-out showed no signs of easing with Bitcoin’s price plunging to more than 30% below its October 7th high, representing more than a trillion dollars in lost value in the space of a month and a half and pushing the cryptocurrency closer to its biggest monthly drop in years.
Asian markets tumbled again on Friday following New York’s vicious intra-day whiplash. The rollercoaster ride continued when US markets opened higher again. The upside catalyst seemed to be Fed-speak, with highly influential New York Fed president Williams articulating the case for a December interest rate cut, triggering a serious spike in the probability of that outcome (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below). Far less surprisingly, Trump stooge governor Miran went all in on the rate cut narrative, as per his master’s instructions.
The gains felt a little fragile, however, especially after sentiment data showed that the American consumer hasn’t felt this pessimistic and worried about the economy since the Great Financial Crisis of 2008. The indexes chopped around as the session went on, but eventually did finish higher on the day as dip buyers moved in to feast on Thursday’s declines.
Alphabet/Google took Microsoft’s spot on the podium as the world’s third biggest company by capitalization behind Nvidia and Apple. The broad indexes, however, still closed out their worst week since so-called “Liberation Day” in April and crypto continues to wallow in a world of pain.
Check out the Angles homepage for my new explainers on workplace benefits, new 401k/IRA contribution limits and tax brackets, HSAs, FSAs, BackDoor IRA and Mega BackDoor 401k contributions - all freshly updated for 2026.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Callie Cox again and well worth a read as always .. No targets. No predictions. No sales pitches or marketing gimmicks. Just the themes to watch for in 2026 and what it could mean for your money.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Please! I’ve never seen a more blatant use of “democratization” as a disguise for selling someone else’s bags. Private equity needs exit liquidity and everyday Americans have it.”
Ritholtz Wealth Management’s COO Nick Maggiulli on the worrying prospect of increasing public “access” to illiquid private equity, including in 401k plans.
Private equity needs suckers to sell their s**t to and is licking its lips at the prospect of skewering retail investors. Don’t fall for it.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson) for the second week in a row ⬆︎ 1.8% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Nvidia, Microsoft) ⬇︎ 5.2% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 1.9% last week, is up 12.5% so far this year and ended the week 4.5% below its all-time record closing high (10/29/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 0.8% last week, is up 6.6% so far this year and ended the week 6.1% below its all-time record closing high (10/15/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price fell 2.7% last week, is up 23.7% so far this year and ended the week 3.9% below its all-time record closing high (11/12/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬌ 3.875% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 7.00% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.90% (3.95% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.51% (3.62% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.62% (3.74% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.06% (4.14% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.67% (4.73% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.71% (4.74% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.24%, one month ago: 6.21%, one year ago: 6.84%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the final rate-setting meeting of the year on December 10th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 31% probability (56% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 69% probability (44% a week ago)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 56%, one month ago: 64%, one year ago: 71%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Faced with rapidly escalating public fury aimed at all sides over the shutdown, Senate Democrats blinked first in the standoff over the weekend, allowing a procedural vote to go through on Sunday night which passed the buck over to the House and the beginning of the end finally came into view.
Wall Street celebrated when markets opened on Monday morning and attention turned to exactly when the upcoming deluge of backed-up economic data can be expected relative to the December 10th Fed Funds Rate announcement and quarterly Dot Plot publication and how reliable the quality of that data will be.
Stocks soared (with the notable exception of health insurance companies), scoring their best one-day performance since May with the S&P 500 and NASDAQ both recovering about 2/3rds of the previous week’s losses in just one session.
The monster reaction rally faded on Tuesday, however, as traders tried to wrap their heads around the inflationary effects of ideas like 50 year mortgages (see ARTICLE OF THE WEEK below) and a deficit-busting $2k per person handout (aka an electoral bribe) in the lead-up to next year’s midterms. Having absurdly insisted the tariffs would not affect consumer affordability, the administration set about walking back selected tariffs on certain household items in the name of .. increasing affordability. The political silly season is clearly beginning to move into high gear.
A degree of AI skepticism was still lurking in the background, with Softbank bailing on its entire Nvidia stake and Coreweave stock falling hard on weak guidance despite a generally satisfactory Q3 earnings report.
A retreat in software and semi-conductor names saw the NASDAQ close lower, but the somewhat less tech-heavy S&P 500 made light gains, highlighting a noticeable growing investor rotation from momentum-driven, high risk, lower quality, growth-oriented names in favor of lower volatility, higher quality and more defensive value-oriented ones. Tiny bit by tiny bit, some risk is being gently eased off the table.
This pattern repeated itself on Wednesday as tech and tech-adjacent sectors (including Bitcoin) skidded further, while the rest of the market had another slightly positive day and relatively tech-light European stocks finished at fresh all-time highs.
Mainly because it’s a stupid index, I rarely mention the still-popular-for-some-reason Dow Jones Industrial Average, but I’ll reluctantly break that rule for once by pointing out that it closed above 48,000 for the first time on Wednesday.
After the market close, the House put the final nail in the coffin of this particular 43-day shutdown, ensuring federal government funding at least through January 30th of next year.
The sense that developed on Thursday was that it could easily be mid-to-late Q1 2026 before any economic data releases become clean or trustworthy (and, according to the White House, we will never be told what the October unemployment rate was).
So markets and the Fed will still be flying relatively blind for a while yet and one outcome could well be that the originally-assumed Fed rate reduction next month may not now happen as the futures market-driven probabilities of a cut fell to below 50% just two weeks after being at over 90% (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below). This anxiety was intensified by Fed officials sounding very cautious about the idea in a number of speeches.
Stocks suffered a very ugly sell-off as a result which only accelerated as Thursday’s session wore on. Once again, the AI, software and semi-conductor big dogs led the charge south, but no corner of the market was spared this time, with the S&P 500 giving back all of Monday’s gains. Interest rates jumped higher.
Asian and European markets dutifully tumbled on Friday and the losses piled up again for risk assets when New York opened with the NASDAQ initially getting walloped again as traders anticipated turbulence linked to the upcoming dubious-quality economic data dump in the coming weeks.
But then the cavalry arrived in the form of aggressive bargain-hunting dip-buyers who emerged to offset the worst of the declines and even carry the bruised and battered NASDAQ fractionally into the green by the close, with the S&P 500 little changed on the day.
Prices and vibes seemed to be shaping the narrative rather than the other way around with no tangible single catalysts for this week’s tech-fueled decline beyond a sense of excess froth and a growing number of unanswered questions about AI and its long term return-on-investment potential. Oh, and by the way, this week we get the Nvidia Q3 earnings report as well as those of the major retailers.
Fasten your seat belts.
Check out the Angles homepage for my new explainers on workplace benefits, new 401k/IRA contribution limits and tax brackets, HSAs, FSAs, BackDoor IRA and Mega BackDoor 401k contributions - all freshly updated for 2026.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
I could not believe that I heard this as even a semi-serious suggestion last week. The utterly bonkers idea of a 50 year mortgage.
The Wall Street Journal was also unimpressed.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Definition of an ideal level of wealth: You can wake up every morning realizing that you are able to spend your time doing what you want, with whom you want, for as long as you want.”
Morgan Housel, author and co-founder of Collaborative Fund
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson) ⬆︎ 3.9% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) ⬇︎ 2.1% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 0.1% last week, is up 14.6% so far this year and ended the week 2.6% below its all-time record closing high (10/29/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 1.7% last week, is up 7.5% so far this year and ended the week 6.1% below its all-time record closing high (10/15/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.0% last week, is up 27.2% so far this year and ended the week 1.3% below its all-time record closing high (11/12/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬌ 3.875% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 7.00% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.95% (3.92% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.62% (3.55% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.74% (3.67% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.14% (4.11% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.73% (4.65% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.74% (4.70% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.22%, one month ago: 6.28%, one year ago: 6.78%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the final rate-setting meeting of the year on December 10th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 56% probability (33% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 44% probability (67% a week ago)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 54%, one month ago: 61%, one year ago: 70%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This technical measure of market breadth is widely considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It was a light weekend for disruptive news which included no progress whatsoever in a resolution of the government shutdown, now in its second month and set to become the longest in US history. It is starting to be acutely felt by millions of Americans with more missed paychecks, food aid broken, cuts to child care kicking in, turmoil at airports and health insurance premiums spiking. Every week that passes with Congress deadlocked is costing the US economy an estimated $10-$30 billion.
Amazon became the latest tech giant to hop on the OpenAI gravy train with a $38 billion cloud deal announcement as US markets opened on Monday and there were small green arrows for the indexes over the course of what was a rather dull first session of November, which is historically the best month of the year for stock prices.
As electors went to the polls to ultimately give Democrats thumping wins in “off-year” elections in New York, New Jersey, Virginia and elsewhere on Tuesday in something of a referendum on the Trump administration, Wall Street got a sudden AI nosebleed.
Traders’ bear market memory banks have been mostly erased lately but sentiment took an abrupt risk-off turn and stocks dumped decisively as sky-high AI valuations seemed to matter all of a sudden. The fact is that if you strip out the Big Tech/AI names that dominate the indexes, the broad stock market had been falling for a week or more. That safety net dramatically fell away on Tuesday.
A collapse in those recently high-flying AI names trashed the NASDAQ by more than 2% and Nvidia by over 4%. Bitcoin saw its entire summer rally wiped out in a matter of hours with a nearly 7% nosedive back to below $100k. Bonds were the main beneficiaries of the outflows and interest rates fell back.
Asian stocks took their lead from Wall Street’s tumbleand took a drubbing of their own, but things had stabilized by the time the baton was passed back to New York on Wednesday with a sense of “Wait, was that it?” in relation to Tuesday’s setback.
The question for traders at the open was; are the dip buyers ready to pounce? The answer seemed to be yes, to a degree, as the indexes came back to recover about a quarter of Tuesday’s losses and the previous day’s sharp drop in interest rates reversed.
But Thursday saw a resumption of the sell-off as state-level data showed plans for the most monthly layoffs by US employers since 2003. The extent of air travel chaos resulting from the shutdown became evident with a report from the FAA detailing massive and rapidly growing levels of cancellations and delays. The Supreme Court appeared to be leaning towards declaring most of Trump’s tariffs to be illegal and possibly worthy of refunds to US businesses, which would cause pandemonium.
AI jitters crept back again following some rather cynical statements from a number of business leaders and the stock prices of the tech big dogs got whacked again. This pile-on of headaches killed off the brief recovery rally and pushed the indexes substantially lower for the second time in three days.
Fueled by another plunge in consumer sentiment to its lowest level in years, momentum from Thursday’s decline knocked stocks down again on Friday morning on what should have been a Jobs Report day.
The swoon continued into the early afternoon until Senate Minority Leader Schumer offered a glimmer of hope with a shutdown-ending proposal which turned markets around and the S&P 500 even managed to close slightly in the green for the day. Markets moving on the back of political negotiations could mean that we are entering a new phase, where the shutdown is beginning to finally really matter to financial markets.
It was a pretty miserable week for stocks in general, and this new concept of possible AI fatigue resulted in a 3% weekly drop in the NASDAQ index, its worst week since the tariff tantrums that accompanied so-called “Liberation Day” back in April.
Bigger-picture bullish momentum seems to be broadly still intact however and the earnings season is generally affirming the positive setup. But this market is clearly being increasingly driven by AI exuberance and, given the relentless nature of the advance over the last two or three years, it doesn’t take much to get traders to take some cash off the table, as last week reminded us.
Check out the Angles homepage for my new explainers for workplace benefits, new 401k/IRA contribution limits and tax brackets, HSAs, FSAs, backdoor and Mega BackDoor contributions - all freshly updated for 2026.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Callie Cox is the best! How to invest without going insane including building a process and why the first investments that you make matter the most in your portfolio.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“The crucial question is whether this rally has already gotten ahead of itself and if it can continue in the final months of the year. Just one unexpected event could knock stocks down from their highs amid poor market breadth, but that may be tough to do, given that traders are usually optimistic around the holidays.”
Ed Yardeni, founder, Yardeni Research (on Monday of last week)
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) ⬆︎ 1.6% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Nvidia, Microsoft) ⬇︎ 4.2% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 1.6% last week, is up 14.5% so far this year and ended the week 2.7% below its all-time record closing high (10/29/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 1.9% last week, is up 9.4% so far this year and ended the week 4.4% below its all-time record closing high (10/15/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price fell 0.6% last week, is up 25.9% so far this year and ended the week 2.1% below its all-time record closing high (10/27/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬌ 3.875% (unchanged from a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 7.00% (unchanged from a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.92% (3.89% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.55% (3.60% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.67% (3.71% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬌ 4.11% (4.11% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.68% (4.65% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.70% (4.67% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.17%, one month ago: 6.32%, one year ago: 6.79%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the final rate-setting meeting of the year on December 10th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 33% probability (37% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 67% probability (63% a week ago)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 54%, one month ago: 64%, one year ago: 74%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
China and the US may have reached a “substantial framework” of some kind of trade agreement, according to breadcrumbs laid over the weekend by Trump, who was scheduled to meet with Chinese premier Xi in Seoul later in the week. He teased a flurry of other Asian trade deals too and local stocks rocketed with more new all-time record highs for markets in Japan and South Korea.
The devil will be in the details of all these trade deals if they even pan out and those are notably lacking right now, but Wall Street still got swept up in the exuberance with the bulls taking complete charge as an event risk-laden week kicked off on Monday, partly bolstered by the stock price of Qualcomm which soared after the firm unveiled new AI chips to challenge Nvidia’s.
Of course, new all-time record highs in US stocks inevitably ensued but the gold price continued to crumble from its recent highs. Oil prices steadied.
A Japan trade deal, check. Trump offered new prime minister Takaichi “anything you want” on Tuesday and moved on to South Korea and a Thursday meeting with Xi. Apple CEO Tim Cook and Nvidia’s Jensen Huang were both wheeled out as performative arm candy.
Back home in the US, Wall Street mostly held its breath ahead of Big Wednesday (a Fed Funds Rate announcement and three Mag 7 earnings reports after the closing bell) but continued concentrated momentum in Tech/AI stocks caused a slow drift upwards and yet more new record highs for the S&P 500, despite the fact that 400 of the 500 stocks in the index were lower on the day.
We got the expected quarter point cut in the Fed Funds Rate on Wednesday, but there was dissent from both sides of the spectrum as Trump’s glove puppet, governor Stephen Miran, called for a bigger cut (shocker!) but governor Jeff Schmid counter-balanced that by voting for no cut at all, exposing widening divisions on the rate-setting committee.
In his dance with the financial press pack, a cautious chairman Powell seemed to cast doubt on the general assumption that a third consecutive rate cut on December 10th is already in the bag (“What do you do when you are driving in the fog? You slow down,”). Market expectations for a December cut were at 92% going into the press conference, but in the space of an hour had collapsed to 55% (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below). Essentially a coin flip.
Wall Street reacted accordingly in real time with a drop-off in stock prices and a jump in interest rates and the indexes shifted from deep in the green to slightly in the red for the session.
Having said that, the fact is that the Fed is gaslighting markets by cutting interest rates while inflation is 3% and rising but still insisting that it has a 2% target (which hasn’t been hit in five years). Wall Street seems to have decided that it’s not going to fall for this nonsense any more and that 3% is very much the new 2% whatever the Fed may claim, anticipating at least three more cuts by July almost regardless of what happens with inflation.
Attention shifted to the post-market earnings reports. Alphabet/Google’s numbers were absolutely outstanding, blasting through estimates for revenue, earnings and any other metric you can think of. Microsoft’s were just meh and Meta’s were negatively impacted by a surprise one-time big tax charge and cash burn concerns. All three are maintaining enormous AI spending, $78 billion between them in Q3 alone (a 90% increase on the same period last year).
While Trump described his meeting with Xi on Thursday as a “12 out of 10” , all we really got was a tariff truce extension which was not enough for Wall Street to hang on to and stocks retreated, with Microsoft and especially Meta dampening index performance.
Two more Mag 7 names, Apple and Amazon, reported after the close. Apple came in pretty solid but without much of a wow factor and its Chinese revenue was problematic again. On the other hand, Amazon stock ripped higher in the after-market following spectacular numbers, particularly for its cloud unit, Amazon Web Services.
An early Friday reboundwas heavily fueled by Amazon, which added $300 billion to its market value in the first minute of trading and reached its own all-time new record high and stocks comfortably completed a sixth straight month of gains, the first time that has happened since the V-shaped COVID recovery over five years ago.
Assuming it is still in place on Wednesday this government shutdown will become the longest in American history, but otherwise the US stock market is currently enjoying the best of all worlds.
It’s getting remarkable earnings (a high 80s percent of reports are beating estimates, many by a lot) and the Fed is choosing to react to something (the labor market) that Wall Street cares a lot less about by lowering interest rates and all the time the bond market is generally behaving itself by not freaking out. This is why stock indexes are scoring new high after new high. The question is, of course, how long can this sweet spot last?
Check out the Angles homepage for my new explainers for workplace benefits, new 401k/IRA contribution limits and tax brackets, HSAs, FSAs, backdoor and Mega BackDoor contributions - all freshly updated for 2026.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
There’s a lot of chatter out there about bubbles. But what exactly is a bubble?
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“More fiction has been written in Excel than Word.”
Anon.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Nvidia, Microsoft) ⬆︎ 2.4% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Welltower, Prologis) ⬇︎ 4.1% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.5% last week, is up 16.4% so far this year and ended the week 0.8% below its all-time record closing high (10/29/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 0.1% last week, is up 11.4% so far this year and ended the week 1.6% below its all-time record closing high (10/15/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price fell 1.2% last week, is up 28.6% so far this year and ended the week 1.2% below its all-time record closing high (10/27/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬇︎ 3.875% (4.125% a week ago)
PRIME RATE ⬇︎ 7.00% (7.25% a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.89% (3.93% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.60% (3.48% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.71% (3.61% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.11% (4.02% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.65% (4.56% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.67% (4.59% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.19%, one month ago: 6.32%, one year ago: 6.72%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the final rate-setting meeting of the year on December 10th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 37% probability (8% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 63% probability (92% a week ago)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 63%, one month ago: 64%, one year ago: 69%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
There was nothing but tumbleweed over the weekend in regards to any resolution of the government shutdown. Israel resumed its deadly bombing of Gaza with the supposed peace agreement barely a week old. Statements out of Kiev and Moscow highlighted entrenched positions that appeared to make the prospect of any kind of viable deal seem rather fanciful.
Coming off their best week since August, stocks moved higher again at the open on Monday (hours after Japanese equities reached fresh all-time record highs) with a strong risk-on mindset ahead of important earnings reports later in the week, particularly from highly-weighted index components Netflix, Tesla and Intel.
Another index heavyweight, Apple, is hurtling towards a $4 trillion valuation and the stock price reached its own new all-time record high for the first time in 2025 on Monday following the release of solid iPhone 17 sales data. This helped push the NASDAQ up to another new record.
Stocks started the session on Tuesday with all the energy of a mandatory driver awareness course. The indexes spent the day hugging the flatline to close unchanged. Gold’s recent spectacular rally came to a screeching halt as the price suffered its worst daily decline in over a decade (see my timely ARTICLE OF THE WEEK in last week’s recap).
Netflix beat Wall Street estimates on earnings and revenue and gave an upbeat forecast after the close, but there was a major caveat. A one-time legal settlement of over $620m with the Brazilian tax authorities was reported and that turned the results into a disappointment versus the estimates. The stock price fell sharply in after-hours trading.
When the real market opened on Wednesday morning, Netflix’s significant decline was confirmed and this, along with developing doubts about the prospects of any imminent Trump/Xi or Trump/Putin meetings and open warfare breaking out among Republican lawmakers about where to go with the shutdown (now the second longest in American history), slammed the indexes substantially lower on the back of some heavy profit-taking.
Indeed, the broad momentum unwind intensified across the board as the gold rout continued into a second day and crypto prices also fell hard. Oil prices spiked 5% on the back of the US imposition of deeper sanctions on Russia that specifically blacklisted two major oil companies.
After the close, Tesla reported miserable net income and a plunge in profits in Q3, in spite of consumers reportedly rushing to buy EVs ahead of the tax credit expiry. The stock price fell in the after-market and the decline only accelerated as Musk tried to explain it all away in a chaotic analyst call during which he seemed more focused on pleading the case to shareholders for his proposed trillion dollar pay package.
Stocks got off to a snoozy start on Thursday but picked up steam as the session wore on with the Trump/Xi meeting seemingly back on, Tesla clawing back some of its initial losses, energy names benefitting from the continuing oil price jump and more positive earnings reports. After a higher close for the indexes, Intel’s numbers, sprinkled as they were with a generous helping of AI pixie dust, comfortably beat estimates.
All seemed to be getting back on track, until a late night out-of-left-field announcement from Trump that he was terminating trade negotiations with Canada because he had been a bit irked by some TV ad aired in Ontario that poked holes in the idea of tariffs. Assuming yet more TACO, Wall Street just rolled its eyes and got on with its day on Friday.
An oasis in the shutdown data desert finally showed up with the delayed pre-market CPI report for September. It showed a small increase to a 3.0% annualized inflation rate that is still a long way from the Fed’s 2.0% target and slowly drifting in the wrong direction.
Nevertheless, the fact that there was no horror show inflation number confirmed to markets that a lowering of the Fed Funds Interest Rate this week is fully locked in with a green light for another cut in December (see INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS below). Stocks surged to end the week at yet more new all-time record highs with the S&P 500 closing in on the 6800 level.
This is a massive upcoming week and I am not being hyperbolic when I say that. Not only is the Fed issuing its interest rate decision on Wednesday but we also get to see Q3 earnings from three Mag 7 names (Microsoft, Meta and Alphabet/Google) as well as ~35% of S&P 500 companies in the busiest week of the earnings season.
The government shutdown pressure will ratchet up further with not far off a million workers set to miss a paycheck on Thursday. Trump and Xi will (maybe) meet this week in Malaysia while the US and Canada will try to repair a currently-broken trading relationship.
Throw in critical elections in Argentina and a military escalation off the coast of Venezuela and Wall Street will be on high alert. And who knows what else could suddenly crop up? Happy Halloween.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
A framework for dealing with a highly-appreciated stock position with huge gains. There are no easy answers.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“When it comes to investing a lot of things are interesting without being meaningful”.
David Booth, Co-founder Dimensional Fund Advisors
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Nvidia, Microsoft) ⬆︎ 3.0% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Walmart, Costco) ⬇︎ 0.8 for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.9% last week, is up 15.6% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time record closing high.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 2.5% last week, is up 12.9% so far this year and ended the week 1.3% below its all-time record closing high (10/15/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.0% last week, is up 27.2% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time record closing high.
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬌ 4.125% (unchanged)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 7.25% (unchanged)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.93% (4.00% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.48% (3.46% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.61% (3.59% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬌ 4.02% (4.02% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.56% (4.58% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.59% (4.60% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.27%, one month ago: 6.32%, one year ago: 6.54%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on October 29th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬌ 1% probability (1% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬌ 99% probability (99% a week ago)
With two more Fed rate-setting meetings left in 2025, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.125%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 58%, one month ago: 61%, one year ago: 72%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
As speculated in last week’s recap, the narrative changed abruptly over the weekend as Trump climbed down from his hostile rhetoric of the previous Friday, posting on social media “Don’t worry about China, it will all be fine!” Going full TACO, he referred to an “eternity” of time for discussions to make progress between now and his proposed 100% tariff imposition date of November 1st.
On the shutdown front and the data desert in particular, we learned that the CPI inflation report may be released on October 24th, but there was still no sign of the postponed Jobs Report for last month or even confirmation of any data-gathering taking place for the next one. As we entered the third week of this debacle, most federal workers went unpaid on Wednesday and chaos began to build at airports. The stakes are unquestionably getting higher by the day but betting markets continue to foresee a lengthy standoff.
Bond markets were closed for the holiday on Monday, but stocks were up and running and breathed a huge sigh of relief at Trump’s China flip-flop. After all, this is a $700 billion trading relationship. The indexes rebounded hard in New York to take a big bite out of Friday’s collapse. Further momentum was provided by Broadcom who became the latest firm to see their stock price jump on the announcement that they were leaping into bed with OpenAI.
Solid Q3 earnings reports and positive outlooks across the board from some of the big box banks on Tuesday were overwhelmed by China’s spiky response to Trump’s unstable and painfully obvious negotiating tactics. Wall Street didn’t like what it saw and stocks resumed their steep decline when markets opened, quickly giving back all of Monday’s gains.
In a major speech/Q&A, Fed chairman Powell skillfully walked the line between expressing inflation and employment concerns but the markets’ spirits were lifted by his perceived emphasis on a weakening labor market, which would imply further Fed Funds Interest Rate cuts in 2025 and stock prices roared back into the green before finally losing a bit of steam right at the end to finish slightly negative for what was a wildly volatile session.
Despite more US/China bickering (soybean and recycled cooking oil this time) including Treasury Secretary Bessent describing China as an untrustworthy partner and its chief negotiator as “unhinged”, stocks moved higher on Wednesday as more banks reported robust Q3 earnings and the announcement of a massive $40 billion+ data center deal involving multiple Big Tech/AI and financial firms.
The AI mega-trend seems to be alive and well according to Taiwan Semi Conductor (TSMC)’s sensational earnings report and forecast on Thursday. This helped juice a brief tech-driven spike in stocks to levels above where we were before Trump had his “100% China tariff” hissy fit the previous Friday and back to within spitting distance of more all-time record highs.
Enthusiasm swiftly waned, however, as we finally got a few earnings reports that failed to beat estimates and concerns grew about what JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon called “cockroaches” in the private credit market and some rather disturbing real estate fraud revelations at regional banks Western Alliance (WA) and Zions. The indexes closed sharply lower, as did interest rates across the curve (see INTEREST RATES below).
Fears of any contagion in the banking sector seem somewhat misplaced right now as these incidents at WA and Zions look (for the moment at least) to be isolated and idiosyncratic, but Dimon’s “cockroaches” comment was hanging in the air as were other recent high-profile collapses (First Brands and Tricolor) and, as I have been banging on about for a while, with the indexes at these lofty levels it doesn’t take much in the way of potentially troubling news to cause Wall Street some agita and stocks stumbled out of the gate on Friday following down-sessions in Asia and Europe.
The anxiety didn’t last long however and the indexes recovered to close the day and the week higher as Trump called his own China tariffs “unsustainable”, his on-again/off-again meeting with premier Xi now looks like it might happen and Treasury Secretary Bessent will meet with his supposedly unhinged counterpart. Interest rates and the US Dollar continued to slide with the highly influential 10 year Treasury rate fleetingly dropping below 4.00%.
There were lots of news-driven big price swings last week but the background drumbeats are exactly the same. The US government remains shut down with no sign of any resolution, tariff chaos is alive and well, a Fed rate cut is still fully expected this month despite a lack of economic data visibility and AI exuberance remains intact. Absolutely nothing changed with any of these factors.
Indeed, if anything, AI enthusiasm is becoming a larger and larger reason that the market can afford to mostly ignore tariffs, labor markets, inflation, the shutdown and all the rest of it.
As long as the colossal level of AI capital expenditure endures, stocks can hold on. But AI is evolving into the lynchpin that is holding up markets and if doubts start to emerge about the stimulative power of AI for the entire economy, then investors may have to confront this less than ideal reality and sharp declines in stocks could result.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE(S) OF THE WEEK ..
Two great articles this week, I couldn’t decide which one was better, so here are both ..
Ritholtz’s Callie Cox: It’s the bull market’s birthday! But all everyone seems to be wondering about is if “the grim reaper is sitting at the door of the nursing home waiting for his next victim”.
“We are currently in the stage of the cycle where many people conjure up reasons for why gold is so attractive because they cannot bring themselves to admit that they mainly like it because its price has gone up a lot.” Always ask yourself with any investment, why do I own this?
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Few things are as valuable in personal finance as a good b*t detector.”*
Morgan Housel
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Welltower, Prologis) ⬆︎ 3.3% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Financials (two biggest holdings: Berkshire Hathaway, JP Morgan) ⬌ flat for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.7% last week, is up 13.4% so far this year and ended the week 1.4% below its all-time record closing high (10/08/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 2.4% last week, is up 10.2% so far this year and ended the week 3.7% below its all-time record closing high (10/15/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 2.8% last week, is up 25.9% so far this year and ended the week 1.1% below its all-time record closing high (10/06/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬌ 4.125% (unchanged)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 7.25% (unchanged)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.00% (4.02% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.46% (3.52% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.59% (3.65% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.02% (4.05% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.58% (4.60% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.60% (4.63% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.30%, one month ago: 6.28%, one year ago: 6.44%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on October 29th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 1% probability (2% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 99% probability (98% a week ago)
With two more Fed rate-setting meetings left in 2025, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.125%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 54%, one month ago: 61%, one year ago: 79%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Fourth quarters have traditionally been very kind to stock markets, with half of the past decade’s returns typically coming in Q4s. Having said that, there was precisely zero progress towards ending the US government shutdown over the weekend. It still appears to be more of an annoyance than a crisis to politicians (and to Wall Street) but the feeling was that this was likely to change if this shambles goes on for an extended period.
Unlike in the US, there were plenty of political developments overseas. Asian stocks surged on Monday morning on the back of the appointment of a new Japanese prime minister but European markets dropped as the French lost theirs.
Wall Street was more excited about AMD inking a multi-billion dollar deal with OpenAI, with the former’s stock price rocketing by over 35% at the open before cooling off a bit later in the session. The indexes shifted higher again because, well why not? That’s what they do. Obviously, new record highs all round.
Dell became the latest tech firm to see its stock price spike on the back of cloaking itself in increased AI adoption on Tuesday, but the broad indexes finally showed signs of fatigue and even a touch of vertigo, finishing lower on the day and snapping the winning streak.
Whisper it softly, but there is a slowly growing anxiety among traders that the market may have been excessively rewarding the more speculative trades in AI-world which may be at risk of suddenly reversing in the case of even lightly disappointing news and it might make sense to take at least some chips off the table, particularly given that the start of the Q3 earnings season is upon us.
Trump used the threat of refusing to back-pay furloughed federal workers or actually firing many of them as a bargaining chip in the so-called shutdown “negotiations”, but the sense remained that the two sides are just shouting past each other and the betting markets continue to see no chance of any imminent resolution.
Stocks rebounded nicely on Wednesday morning with the US government taking more stakes in private companies, this time in the rare earth minerals space, as the move in the direction of an almost Soviet-style central planning via a taxpayer-funded sovereign wealth fund continued with Wall Street wondering; who’s next?
The minutes from the Fed’s last policy meeting released on Wednesday indicated that most officials still believe further interest rate cuts will be necessary throughout the rest of 2025. Nvidia boss Jensen Huang gave an upbeat AI “State of the Union” speech (shocker!).
The outcome was a return to new record closing highs for the S&P 500 for an astonishing 33rd time so far in 2025, a year that also includes a 19% fall in the index over a stretch of less than two months back in the spring. Interest rates dipped.
Exhaustion and vertigo kicked back in on Thursday and the indexes closed lower, even as the heavily-weighted Nvidia stock price reached its own new record high and Delta Airlines and Pepsi kicked off the Q3 earnings season with healthy reports.
Trump apparently got out of the wrong side of the bed on Friday. In addition to saying tough luck, there’s not enough money for food stamps for Americans (within hours of setting up a $20 billion bailout for Argentina) and starting to follow through on his threat of laying off federal workers, he also appeared to suddenly lose patience with the glacial pace of the China trade talks and lashed out by unleashing a 100% tariff, effective November 1st. He also called off his planned meeting with Chinese premier Xi.
Markets, already wavering, were severely rattled by the flare-up and and stocks tanked hard, having their worst day since their original tariff tantrum back in April.
I was attending a conference at the New York Stock Exchange on Friday and was on the floor watching stocks have their worst session in ages - coincidence? :-)
It seems entirely possible that these concerns could well spill into the coming week, but weekend events and news flow often have the habit these days of abruptly changing narratives by Monday morning, so who knows?
The past twenty government shutdowns have averaged a length of eight days. We’re well past that already this time. Indeed, the betting odds are already closing in on a 50% probability that this shutdown will be the longest in the nation’s history (the current record is 35 days).
We are entering a zone whereby we will have to begin to question the quality of October’s critically important economic data, even if it becomes available at all, thereby impacting the Fed’s ability to correctly read the tealeaves at its October 28th/29th Fed Funds interest rate-setting meeting.
While there’s still a background rumbling of worry that things are frothy and that trees don’t grow to the sky, fighting the upward momentum by selling (or even pausing buying) longer term holdings due to fears of a market fall has ended up being a disastrous strategy for three years now.
Timing the market doesn’t work because you simply can’t do it.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
It appears that Congress seems to think that hiding fund fees is good for you.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“The timing [of buying gold] has to be almost perfect because the times in between gains are long and painful. A dollar invested in gold in 1928 would have grown to less than $13k by 2025; a dollar in the S&P 500 with dividends reinvested would have grown to nearly $1 million and Small Cap stocks to almost $5 million. Even corporate bonds would have done 4X as well as gold.”
Spencer Jakab, Wall Street Journal
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Constellation Energy) ⬆︎ 1.5% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy for the second week in a row (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) ⬇︎ 4.1% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 2.4% last week, is up 11.4% so far this year and ended the week 3.1% below its all-time record closing high (10/08/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 3.3% last week, is up 7.6% so far this year and ended the week 4.3% below its all-time record closing high (10/06/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price fell 3.3% last week, is up 22.5% so far this year and ended the week 3.8% below its all-time record closing high (10/06/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬌ 4.125% (unchanged)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 7.25% (unchanged)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.02% (4.03% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.52% (3.58% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.65% (3.72% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.05% (4.13% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.60% (4.69% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.63% (4.71% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.34%, one month ago: 6.40%, one year ago: 6.32%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on October 29th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 2% probability (4% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 98% probability (96% a week ago)
With two more Fed rate-setting meetings left in 2025, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.125%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 65%, one month ago: 62%, one year ago: 75%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index. A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
As the end of the month and the quarter approached, Wall Street prepped over the weekend for a narrative likely to be dominated by tiresome government shutdown-related brinkmanship in Washington DC. Investors have generally been well-served by ignoring domestic politics. That was always going to be a difficult task last week.
The countdown to 12:01am ET on Wednesday began on Monday with stocks still hanging on to seemingly endless AI exuberance and the effects of mutual fund end-of-quarter window dressing, pushed tech and tech-adjacent prices higher to extend the previous Friday’s gains in the indexes.
Congressional leaders from both sides met with Trump and Vance on Monday in an attempt to find an off-ramp for the looming shutdown. Given the cast of characters involved, it was no surprise that the meeting was a complete fail and the nasty partisan blame game intensified (including an appalling social media deep-fake video). Betting markets immediately raised the odds of a shutdown from 75% to 89%.
Wall Street woke up to more new tariffs on Tuesday, the final day of the month and the quarterand Shutdown Eve. Timber, lumber and furniture were the latest victims and, by extension, the American homebuilding industry and Canada.
Stocks sank moderately to start the session with a shutdown assumption now firmly baked in. Some late dip-buying squeaked the indexes into the green by the close and complete a fifth straight month of gains and their best-performing September since 2010. Traders pulled up their lawn chairs to watch the pitiful, shabby events unfold in Congress.
The most powerful nation on earth had no fully-functioning government in place when financial markets opened on Wednesday. With the regular Jobs Report looking unlikely to be published as scheduled on Friday, the normally B-list ADP payrolls report took on greater importance and came in very soft, showing negative private sector job growth.
As institutional traders began to reconstitute their portfolios for what is historically a favorable final quarter, stocks finished higher and interest rates fell on the back of the Fed-rate-cut-friendly ADP data. Much to the relief of financial markets, Trump withdrew his nomination of unqualified Jan 6th rioter EJ Antoni, who once called social security “a Ponzi scheme”, for the role of head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
Wall Street continued to dance to the beat of its own music on Thursday while chaos reigned in the nation’s capital, with the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ breezing to more new all-time record highs based on the same old cheerfulness brought about by falling interest rate expectations and AI optimism, the gift that just keeps on giving. Healthcare stocks had a rare boost as Pfizer and Eli Lilly appeared to be coming to pricing agreements with the administration.
Jobs Report Day arrived on Friday with the stock indexes on a five-day winning streak but no Jobs Report. The data had already been collected, all that remained to be done was for someone at the BLS to hit the send button, but that didn’t happen and Trump refused to deem the agency as essential and thereby release the report as he had discretion to do. This led of course to conspiracy theories about whether he had had a sneak peek of the numbers and didn’t like what he saw.
Stocks shrugged it all off though and the indexes strolled pretty aimlessly along the flatline all day. The S&P 500 eked out the most miniscule of gains at the close but it was enough to technically record a sixth straight up-day and another all-time record high to cap a solid week.
The betting markets are confidently predicting the shutdown lasting until at least October 15th. One date to keep in mind is this coming Friday, October 10th, the next scheduled pay-day for federal workers. The heat could crank up considerably if that is missed and initial polling suggests that the country is already blaming Trump and his minions in Congress for this mess. The motivation to end the standoff might start to pick up at that point.
Bottom line, the shutdown isn’t going to alter the economic outlook or cause any sustainable market volatility unless we get into multi-month territory and it won’t, of itself, undermine the core bullish drivers of i) solid growth, ii) falling interest rates, iii) AI enthusiasm and iv) stable inflation.
It has already, however, started causing delays in the data and may impact further releases, such as the planned CPI inflation number on October 15th. Such an outcome would inject uncertainty into the Fed’s decision-making process, forcing it to fly blind in foggy skies at the rate-setting meeting on October 29th and that could potentially trigger unnecessary short-term market volatility.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
What actually happens in a government shutdown?
.. AND I QUOTE ..
With the shutdown in mind .. “Never put off until tomorrow what may be done the day after tomorrow” .
Mark Twain
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson) ⬆︎ 6.9% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) ⬇︎ 3.4% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.1% last week, is up 14.2% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time record closing high.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 1.9% last week, is up 11.3% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time record closing high.
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 2.6% last week, is up 26.7% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time record closing high.
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬌ 4.125% (unchanged)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 7.25% (unchanged)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.03% (4.02% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.58% (3.63% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 3.72% (3.76% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.13% (4.20% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.69% (4.74% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.71% (4.77% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.30%, one month ago: 6.45%, one year ago: 6.12%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on October 29th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 4% probability (8% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 96% probability (92% a week ago)
With two more Fed rate-setting meetings left in 2025, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.125%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 62%, one month ago: 56%, one year ago: 76%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index. A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Note: Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Following a mostly meaningful news-free weekend, markets headed into the last full week of September, historically the worst week of the year for stock prices, with lots of Fed governor speeches lined up including from the president’s manservant Stephen Miran and chairman Powell along with a potentially spicy UN General Assembly (UNGA) in New York and developing concerns about an imminent US government shutdown.
Even so, the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ still managed to push deeper into all-time high territory for a third session in a row on Monday after Nvidia, the indexes’ largest component stock, touched its own new record high price after announcing a $100 billion investment in OpenAI.
Miran parroted all of the president’s talking points about implementing a series of jumbo Fed Funds Interest Rate cuts while implausibly denying that the administration was exercising any influence on him. Trump drew a totally unfounded causal link between child autism and pregnant women’s use of Tylenol and some healthcare stocks wavered in response to the absurd claim that was quickly refuted by medical experts from the US and around the world.
Markets paused for breath on Tuesday morning, awaiting any signals from Powell’s lunchtime speech. As a warm up act, Trump gave his UN audience the big middle finger in a meandering, largely fact-free rant at the UNGA.
More importantly for financial markets, Powell reiterated in his address that there was no risk-free path forward when it comes to interest rate policy and seemed to place equal weight on both inflation and unemployment risk. He also called the stock market “highly valued”and gave no firm assurances of continued rate cuts. Disappointed traders took the indexes substantially lower, driving down tech stocks in particular.
A generally quiet day on the news front on Wednesday provided the opportunity for more profit-taking in the tech sector after the recent run-up. Although a government shutdown would still be more of a political stunt than a market-impacting event, the ever-increasing prospect was starting to unnerve Wall Street, particularly the possibility that the Jobs Report may not even be released this week as a result and the indexes all closed in the red.
Stocks continued their retreat from all-time highs on Thursday after GDP growth was confirmed to be at its highest level for two years, a scorching hot 3.8% for Q2 and jobless claims remained tame, both undermining the case for giant Fed rate cuts to rescue the country from a seemingly non-existent imminent economic disaster.
After the close, Trump - who just weeks ago promised to bring down consumer healthcare costs - decreed a 100% tariff on all imported branded pharmaceutical products beginning on October 1st along with additional levies on another batch of goods from trucks to high national security-risk items such as kitchen cabinets and bathroom vanities.
Wall Street, always a TACO believer, mostly shrugged off the announcement on Friday and was focused more on the PCE inflationreading which came in hovering close to 3.0% as expected and another decline in consumer sentiment. The absence of a nasty upside surprise in the inflation data cheered the stock market and the indexes snapped their three day losing streak but still experienced a small weekly loss for the first time this month.
Market-driven interest rates have only moved upwards since the Fed rate cut on September 17th and this phenomenon persisted last week (see INTEREST RATES below) and mortgage rates have now turned back higher after weeks of consistently dropping (see below).
Last week’s moderate pullback notwithstanding, why have stocks been sizzling while economic conditions feel so depressed for many? There is a powerful three-way tailwind that has sent the indexes to new highs, favoring certain sectors and confirming the accurate old adage that the stock market is not the economy.
Monetary stimulus through ongoing Fed overnight interest rate cuts and hopes that market-driven rates will follow suit further out on the curve
Fiscal stimulus that was solidified and boosted by the tax and spending bill but which only works if there is strong and persistent economic growth
Private stimulus from continued AI enthusiasm and massive related capital expenditure from a handful of companies that are showing consistently strong earnings
As long as this trinity of stimuli remains in place (not guaranteed by any means), there is currently little reason to fear the imminent death of the rally.
However, if growing tariff-fed inflation starts to cramp the Fed’s style when it comes to rate cuts and/or if growth starts to slow and/or if doubts emerge about AI adoption and the associated cap-ex and earnings start to tail off, then the stock market will suddenly be very vulnerable to a pullback or worse and that should not be ignored amidst the currently highly bullish sentiment.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
150 years of the 60/40 stock/bond portfolio. “The point isn’t how much the 60/40 grew, it’s how much it didn’t lose during downturns”.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“I want for AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes.”
Joanna Maciejewska, author
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) ⬆︎ 3.9% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Newmont) ⬇︎ 2.2% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price fell 0.3% last week, is up 12.9% so far this year and ended the week 0.8% below its all-time record closing high (09/22/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price fell 0.7% last week, is up 9.2% so far this year and ended the week 2.4% below its all-time record closing high (09/18/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price fell 0.5% last week, is up 23.5% so far this year and ended the week 2.0% below its all-time record closing high (09/22/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬌ 4.125% (unchanged)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 7.25% (unchanged)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.02% (4.03% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.63% (3.57% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.76% (3.68% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.20% (4.14% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.74% (4.71% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.77% (4.75% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.26%, one month ago: 6.57%, one year ago: 6.08%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on October 29th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 12% probability (8% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 88% probability (92% a week ago)
With two more Fed rate-setting meetings left in 2025, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.125%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 60%, one month ago: 64%, one year ago: 80%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index. A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Note: Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Trump piled the pressure on the Fed over the weekend, barking that he expected a “big cut” from the central bank after their meeting on Wednesday. Market-driven expectations remained above 90% that the Fed Funds Interest Rate would be lowered by a quarter of a point, as the committee prioritizes addressing a cooling labor market even while sticky inflation complicates the picture. Traders were also prepping to take a close look at the quarterly “Dot Plot”update of economic and interest rate forecasts.
Once markets opened on Monday, Alphabet/Google joined juggernauts Nvidia, Microsoft and Apple in the $3 trillion+ valuation club and the tech giants pulled the indexes higher with the S&P 500 and NASDAQ reaching their 25th and 26th (respectively) new all-time record highs of the year.
To the surprise of absolutely no-one, Senate Republicans obediently fell in line behind their chief on Monday night, merrily waving through Trump’s controversial pick for “on-loan” Fed governor Stephen Miran just in time for the White House advisor to take a seat on the central bank interest rate-setting committee the very next day as the president’s personal fox in the henhouse.
Also in attendance was governor Lisa Cook after the administration’s frantic attempt to have her forcibly removed from the meeting for supposed mortgage fraud was tossed out in court. The cause was not helped by the revelation that Trump loyalist, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, appears to have an identical situation with his own mortgage applications, which were for about 30x the amount of Cook’s.
Pre-market on Tuesday, Wall Street got the latest Retail Sales figures to chew on which showed much more resilience than expected from the US consumer. As the old saying goes; “don’t stand between an American and a cash register”. A few chips were taken off the table right ahead of Fed Day and the indexes quietly went nowhere.
The date that’s been circled on many calendars for a long time finally arrived on Wednesday. As anticipated, officials cut the Fed Funds interest rate by a quarter of a percent to a 4.125% mid-point. Parachuted-in governor Miran was a lonely “Billy-No-Mates” in the room as literally no-one joined him in dissenting from the “only” quarter-point cut decision. Powell’s press conference failed to produce any fireworks.
The Dot Plot showed that the median assumption on the committee was for two more quarter point reductions over the course of the two remaining meetings this year, although there was a lot of dispersion of opinion with seven of the nineteen members predicting no more cuts at all in 2025. The Fed is essentially sending two credible messages at the same time. Yes, the median dot implies two more cuts this year, but the dot distribution says those cuts need to be earned by the data, especially upcoming jobs and inflation numbers.
It was all a bit of a yawn for stock markets, which lost a little ground with some rate cut-hungry traders slightly disappointed by the fact that the only support for anything more than a quarter-point reduction came from the president’s own hand-picked man on the inside.
The announcement that Nvidia will join the US government in taking a stake in Intel sparked another steep AI-driven rally on Thursday, although the deal was largely viewed as having Trump’s fingerprints all over it. Intel’s stock price jumped 30% at the open and the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ comfortably reclaimed more new all-time record highs by the close where they were finally joined by the Russell 2000 Small Cap Index which, after years in the wilderness, reached its first new record close since November 2021.
It was more of the same on Friday with stocks moving onwards and upwards to close out a very solid week in spite of a third Russian incursion into NATO territory (Estonia this time) and the US lurching closer to an October 1st government shutdown after nonsensical Congressional petty bickering scuppered a deal.
Even though last week’s Fed decision on its overnight rate had no direct effect on mortgage rates (which pivot off the market-driven 10-year Treasury rate, which actually moved higher last week - see INTEREST RATES below), it did result in an immediate cut in the interest rate paid by most cash instruments like money market accounts, CDs and high yield savings accounts (see my newly-updated post CASH IS STILL INTERESTING) as well as a 0.25% reduction in the Prime Rate.
The fact that the US central bank was prepared to cut rates (thereby potentially stimulating inflation) even while CPI is running at basically 3% casts some doubt on how seriously the Fed is going to take its self-imposed 2% inflation target level (which hasn’t been accomplished in over five years) going forward.
The likelihood now seems to be that, over the next several months and quarters, we will find ourselves in a run-hot economy characterized by elevated economic growth, continued AI enthusiasm but potentially lively inflation and of course an endless supply of bonkers out-of-left-field surprises.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Investing and reinvesting can be hard, it’s confusing, it’s uncomfortable. But you need to do it for your future well-being.” Ritholtz’s Callie Cox on why you likely can’t just W2 your way to wealth.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
"The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient."
Warren Buffett
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology for the second week in a row (two biggest holdings: Nvidia, Microsoft) ⬆︎ 3.0% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, Welltower) ⬇︎ 1.2% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.0% last week, is up 13.2% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time record closing high.
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 2.0% last week, is up 10.0% so far this year and ended the week 1.0% below its all-time record closing high (09/18/2025).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price was unchanged last week, is up 24.1% so far this year and ended the week 1.5% below its all-time record closing high (09/18/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS ⬇︎ 4.125% (4.375% a week ago)*
PRIME RATE ⬇︎ 7.25% (7.50% a week ago)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.03% (4.08% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.57% (3.56% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.68% (3.63% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.14% (4.06% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.71% (4.65% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.75% (4.68% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.35%, one month ago: 6.58%, one year ago: 6.09%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on October 29th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬇︎ 8% probability (15% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 92% probability (80% a week ago)
0.50% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 0% probability (5% a week ago)
With two more Fed rate-setting meetings left in 2025, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.125%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 63%, one month ago: 62%, one year ago: 78%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index. A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Note: Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The weekend newswires were dominated by the resignation of Japanese prime minister Ishiba after two crushing parliamentary defeats, political chaos and public disorder on the rise in the UK, France and Argentina, a brutal intensification of Russia’s assault on Ukraine and Trump’s plans to militarize the streets of Chicago and Memphis.
Stocks recovered from the previous Friday’s wobble, regaining some equilibrium on Monday at the start of a week likely to be dominated by key inflation data on Wednesday and Thursday. The indexes meandered around aimlessly for the entire session but closed a tad higher.
The annual revision of Bureau of Labour Statistics employment data came out on Tuesday. This is when the under-fire agency uses hindsight to transparently compare its monthly labor market survey findings to the actual facts. The mea culpa for the March 2024 to March 2025 period showed an estimate of 911k fewer jobs actually created than estimated by the surveys and provided ripe political fodder for Trump who delighted in the terrible-sounding number. The fact is, however, that this kind of delta represents a lower statistical margin of error than most other kinds of surveys.
Wall Street understands this even if Trump-world doesn’t and the meltup in stocks continued. Israel deciding to bomb key US ally Qatar kept a bit of a lid on things, but we still ended the day at more new all-time highs for the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ.
On Wednesday morning we got the first inflation drop of the week before markets opened. Wholesale PPI, which had surprised to the upside for July, surprised to the downside for August. Wall Street’s reaction was predictable, stocks jumped and interest rates fell.
Oracle issued a stunning earnings report with a fiercely aggressive forecast and the stock price skyrocketed by more than 35% (resulting in co-founder Larry Ellison blowing past Elon Musk as the world’s richest individual).
The stock indexes just about held on to their gains over the course of the day despite a Russian drone incursion into NATO domain in Poland and both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ tiptoed a little deeper into fresh record high territory.
The last big data point release before the next Fed meeting was the retail CPI inflation report pre-market on Thursday. It came in slightly hotter than expected, accelerating to a 2.9% annualized rate with noticeable price increases in tariff-exposed products, but still kept a Federal Funds interest rate cut very much in play and that elated stock markets which zoomed higher again. A third consecutive day of new all-time highs, obviously.
The Epstein affair (or “hoax” depending who you talk to) rumbles on and claimed its first major political scalp on Thursday as Peter Mandelson, Britain’s US ambassador, was unceremoniously sacked just days before a Trump state visit to the UK.
On Friday, we learned that sentiment among American consumers had sunk again and the public’s long term inflation fears have increased. JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon began bandying the word “recession” around on CNBC. Healthcare stocks were hurt by reports that the Trump administration is set to preposterously claim that COVID vaccines routinely kill children.
Stocks flatlined as traders took something of a break from their seemingly endless buying spree, but the NASDAQ still managed to squeak out a fourth consecutive day of new all-time highs. Shorter term interest rates reversed course and moved higher but the longer end continued to head lower (see INTEREST RATES below).
Usually, the big questions in advance of a Fed policy meeting revolve around what the committee will do and what the chairman will say. This time, however, we don't even know for sure who will be in the room.
Senate Republicans are seeking to fast-track Trump’s hand-picked White House adviser Stephen Miran as a temporary Fed governor on Monday, which would allow him to join the meeting that begins on Tuesday morning and culminates on Wednesday afternoon with chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference.
Meanwhile, the court battle over whether the president can unilaterally fire Fed governor Lisa Cook has also been put in the fast lane. A district court judge last week ruled that he cannot legally do so until her case has been fully litigated and any wrong-doing proven in court. The Trump administration's appeal against that ruling could be heard before Tuesday.
The outcome of these two processes could not only determine the magnitude of the interest rate cut to be announced on Wednesday lunchtime (the expected quarter-point or a possible jumbo half-point?) but much more importantly, whether this cut will be just a mid-cycle adjustment to be followed by maybe a small number of measured trims here and there over the next couple of years or a beginning of the series of multiple frequent and dramatic cuts that Trump keeps demanding.
The stakes could not be higher; the upcoming trajectory of the entire US economy.
If you are not yet a client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The guys at Dimensional (DFA) make excellent points about keeping calm in the face of all the doom-mongering noise out thereabout an imminent huge market crash.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“Would you choose the cheapest dentist in town? The restaurant with rock-bottom prices? The cheapest used car on the lot? Most of us instinctively know the answer is no - yet when it comes to investing, many people fall into the dangerous trap of equating cheap with attractive and desirable.”
Bogumil Baranowski
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Nvidia, Microsoft) ⬆︎ 3.1% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Walmart, Costco) ⬇︎ 0.7% for the week
SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.6% last week, is up 12.2% so far this year and ended the week 0.3% below its all-time record closing high (09/11/2025).
IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 0.3% last week, is up 7.9% so far this year and ended the week 2.7% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.8% last week, is up 24.0% so far this year and ended the week 0.2% below its all-time record closing high (09/11/2025).
INTEREST RATES:
FED FUNDS * ⬌ 4.33% (unchanged)
PRIME RATE ⬌ 7.50% (unchanged)
3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.08% (4.07% a week ago)
2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.56% (3.51% a week ago)
5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.63% (3.59% a week ago)
10 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.06% (4.10% a week ago)*
20 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.65% (4.72% a week ago)
30 YEAR TREASURY ⬇︎ 4.68% (4.78% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
* Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Used as a basis for determining many consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit, securities-based lending and auto loans.*
** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans*
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
One week ago: 6.50%, one month ago: 6.60%, one year ago: 6.20%
Data courtesy of Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on September 17th?
Unchanged from now .. ⬌ 0% probability (0% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. ⬆︎ 93% probability (89% a week ago)
0.50% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 7% probability (11% a week ago)
With three more rate-setting meetings left in 2025, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.33%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 63%, one month ago: 58%, one year ago: 70%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index. A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Note: Anglia Advisors has updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The bond market was closed on Monday for Veterans’ Day, but the stock market was up and running and squeaked out a tiny further extension of its winning streak on light trading volume with Small Caps leading and Tech/AI lagging. The slight gain was enough, however, to achieve a first-ever S&P 500 close above the 6000 level (just 263 days after first breaking through 5000) and the first-ever Dow Jones Industrial Average close above 44,000.
Election outcome uncertainty transformed into policy uncertainty as Trump began to show his hand with cabinet appointments. The election-fueled rally finally cooled on Tuesday as stocks ran out of steam, easing lower with Small Caps in particular giving back a chunk of their recent gains.
Things were not helped when bond traders returned from their long weekend and proceeded to spike interest rates and send bond prices spiraling lower on the back of concerns that many of Trump's proposed policies, ranging from tariffs to mass deportations, will simply stoke higher inflation and a possible resulting slowdown in the rate-cutting cycle.
Before the open on Wednesday, we got the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation which came in exactly as expected, up +0.2% for the month of October and an annualized rate of +2.6%. Wall Street is tending to treat “as expected” inflation numbers with some relief these days as they keep stock-friendly interest rate cut hopes alive and prices opened in the green before pulling back to close unchanged for the session. The Tech/AI sector once again struggled to keep up with the performance of the rest of the market.
Wednesday also saw the largely-predicted final confirmation of a Republican clean sweep as the party officially retained control of the House of Representatives to add to the presidency and the Senate.
Thursday began with the release of CPI’s baby brother, the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers which often foreshadows what consumers will pay in the future. It rose by a smidge more than anticipated, up +0.2% in October and +2.4% annualized.
Stocks initially responded positively, shifting higher at the open but then abruptly changed direction to finish the day in the red again. The sudden decline could mostly be put down to the Fed chairman Jerome Powell catching Wall Street off guard by telling business leaders in Dallas that the U.S. economy is "not sending any signal that we need to be in a hurry to lower rates" and that the central bank’s interest rate-cutting process “could be on the verge of a pause”.
Uh-oh.
Also unsettling investors were concerns about the possible impact of some of Trump’s often head-scratching cabinet picks and Musk’s growing role in policy-making (see OTHER NEWS below). For example, healthcare stocks plummeted on Thursday when it became clear that the president-elect had tapped vaccine-skeptic and all-around strange person Robert Kennedy to head up the Department of Health and Human Services.
Despite a pre-market release of some very healthy Retail Sales numbers, the reversal lower in stock prices resumed on Friday with the recurring pattern of stumbling Tech/AI. Losses intensified as the day went on, as bonds fell hard again on higher interest rates and the massacre continued in the healthcare sector as a result of the Kennedy pick. A tough week ended on a very sour note.
Whenever the market makes a dramatic move such as the one we saw in the wake of the election, it is always good practice to step back and at least consider certain scenarios that could play out that are different from the consensus outlook.
5%+ weekly moves up in stock prices generally tend to occur when the market outlook is uncertain, trader conviction is low and investors are far more worried about missing out on additional upside and far less focused on capital preservation.
There are market risks to the pro-growth agenda and proposed policies of the incoming administration. Do we take Trump literally in what he says he’s going to do, particularly in the area of tariff impositions, deportations and powers given to his recently-announced Musk/Ramaswamy-led Department of Government Efficiency or is it indicative of simply a broad direction of travel?
If the Republicans’ radical growth plan threatens to further balloon the deficit then the bond market taking interest rates substantially higher and crashing bond prices will inject significant volatility, no matter what any economic growth actually ends up looking like.
Higher yields in fixed income always suck capital from equities and make stocks less attractive on a risk-adjusted basis relative to the deemed-safer alternative of bonds.
The tailwinds provided by the vibrant economy may cause the Fed to slow the pace of interest rate cuts and markets have priced in two or three quarter point reductions over the course of ten meetings in 2025. That’s a lot of pauses where the central bank simply sits on its hands and does nothing.
Right now Wall Street seems to be just about at peace with that, but if the Fed is seen to row back a bit on even those cuts, that is going to strongly disappoint markets and likely throw a wrench into any stock market rally.
Economically speaking, 2024 has been a perfect storm in a good way. Everything went right. But what that means is that, going into 2025, we are riding the crest of a wave and that, while things can definitely still remain positive, it’s not going to be easy to build much further on that and get meaningfully better.
OTHER NEWS ..
Distracted .. Tesla shares soared 30% in the week of the election, but there is world where even gains of that size could soon become fleeting. Since then, there’s already been a sixth recall of all the company’s Cybertrucks, the proposed cancellation of the existing tax incentive for consumers to buy electric vehicles and the selection of Musk to head up a Department of Government Efficiency and even spending time getting involved in geopolitical diplomatic roles likely to cause yet more distraction from his duties at Tesla will be of concern to shareholders.
There is also a non-trivial possibility that he might just become the most hated man in America depending on exactly what this new department may implement in terms of spending cuts. That is unlikely to be good news for Tesla’s stock price and the company’s relatively high weighting in index funds means that the effect could be felt by many millions of investors.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
How boomers’ money secrets are a ticking time bomb for their kids.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Earnings from Nvidia after-market on Wednesday will be this week's highlight, as Q3 earnings season starts to draw to a close.
Other earnings of note include Walmart, Target, Lowe’s, Medtronic, Snowflake, Deere and Intuit.
Economic data coming out this week will be mostly housing-related.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Financials (two biggest holdings: Berkshire Hathaway, JP Morgan Chase) - up 1.5% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: Eli Lilly, United Health Group) - down 5.4% for the week.
SPY, theS&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 2.0% last week, is up 23.2% so far this year and ended the week 2.2% below its all-time record closing high (11/11/2024)
IWM, theRussell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 of the largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 3.9% last week, is up 13.8% so far this year and ended the week 5.8% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.79%, one month ago: 6.44%, one year ago: 7.44%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be after the Fed’s next meeting on December 18th?
Higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 40% probability (35% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 60% probability (65% a week ago)
0.50% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 65%, one month ago: 76%, one year ago: 69%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 74%, one month ago: 78%, one year ago: 50%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 50% (42% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 22% (31% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 28% (27% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 22 (Bullish by 15 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial decisions, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind.
Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until a properly-executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Wow. Where to even begin unpacking last week? OK, let’s give it a try ..
As an immense week began, Wall Street was acutely aware that following the 2020 election, stock prices swung around in both directions in an 11% range in the 24 hours following the closing of the polls and this time around the election looked even closer than it did then. If we go back to 2000, stocks fell 12% between election day and the Supreme Court’s removal of the ambiguity surrounding the outcome a few weeks later.
Throw in the current proximity to all-time record highs in stock prices and it was perhaps no surprise that many traders appeared to have decided to sit things out until some kind of clarity emerged. As one analyst predicted: “November 5th is going to be a blindfolded mud-wrestle in a minefield.”
Stocks were flat at the open on Monday, but drifted lower throughout the session as, if anything, uncertainty about the eventual winner actually increased on the final day of the campaign.
Election Day finally arrived on Tuesday and traders (and financial newsletter writers!) hunkered down for what was expected to be a long, caffeine-fueled 24 hours. Stocks opened cautiously higher on light volume with a calm-before-the-storm feel as Americans headed to the polls but then accelerated sharply upwards as the session wore on, with Small Caps leading the way.
This was mostly in reaction to a growing sense at the time that, however things were to shake out on a presidential level, neither party seemed likely to achieve a sweep of the presidency, House and Senate. This might help prevent anything too “crazy” from happening in the coming years and Wall Street really doesn’t like crazy.
Tuesday turned into Wednesday and as the results poured in, a resounding Trump win came into view pretty quickly, along with a confirmed Republican Senate grab with the House too close to call yet but likely also leaning red which would complete the trifecta, effectively giving the new president pretty much a blank check.
Traders reacted swiftly. U.S. stock index futures rallied substantially higher, interest rates shot up and Bitcoin soared to new all-time record high levels. Europe woke up to the prospect of another Trump presidency, an almost certain explosion of a global trade war and a changed dynamic in the Ukraine conflict and local stocks sold off.
When U.S. markets opened, stock indexes ripped higher, once again led by sky-rocketing Small Caps, on the prospect that the new administration will juice the economy and corporate earnings with lower taxes and deregulation as well just pure relief that the hurdle of U.S. election uncertainty had been cleared, regardless of who won. Wall Street now had the certainty it craves, at least.
On the other hand, bonds crashed hard as interest rates roared higher on the back of fears about a Trump-triggered spike in U.S. inflation and deficit spending.
Gains on this side of the Atlantic mounted as the session continued and it ended up being best single day for the S&P 500 in two years. The index closed at yet another all-time record high and within striking distance of the 6000 milestone. The NASDAQ also made new all-time highs. But the star performer of the day was the Russell 2000 Small Cap index which closed up nearly 6%, as smaller companies were seen to be the main beneficiaries of a high tariff policy like the one Trump has been talking about.
Possibly the penultimate interest rate-setting meeting of the Federal Reserve as an independent central bank free from presidential interference if Trump has his way concluded on Thursday afternoon in advance of chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference. Stocks built further on the previous day’s massive gains in advance of the 2pm ET announcement. It was notable however that Wednesday’s biggest winners were Thursday’s underperformers (actually a good sign for market breadth).
To the surprise of absolutely no-one, interest rates were cut by a quarter of a point by unanimous decree from the Fed committee. Neither the decision itself or the chairman’s rather tense presser afterwards had any real impact on stock prices, but the morning’s gains carried the indexes deeper into new all-time record high territory. The Fed’s move reinforced that nothing in the election or recent data has changed the fact that we are still in an interest rate cutting cycle and that’s good for stocks.
Perhaps the most interesting answer given by Powell, who has been Fed chairman since 2018 and whose term ends in May 2026, was when he was asked whether he would resign if asked to do so by Trump, to which he gave an emphatic one word answer; “No.”
Wall Street took something of a well-deserved breather on Friday, exhaling to digest the week’s tumultuous moves, but stocks still managed to move higher on the day, with the S&P 500 briefly breaking through the 6000 level before closing at its 50th all-time record high of the year. The stock market has its certainty, but it may come with a frothy price tag.
The index scorecard for the week showed the S&P 500 up by 4.7% (its best week of 2024), the NASDAQ 5.7% higher and the Russell 2000 Small Cap index with an astonishing 8.8% rise (its best week for years).
Making investment decisions and moving assets around based on politics is a fool’s errand. Long after the torrid election reaction has faded, Fed policy, economic growth and earnings will again be what steers this market. Making knee-jerk, portfolio-changing decisions right now is a really, really bad idea.
The best investment advice I can give right now is to quote the next president from his 2020 campaign in reference to the Proud Boys, “Stand back and stand by”.
OTHER NEWS ..
That’s Rich! .. The net worth of the world's ten richest people surged by a daily record of $63.5 billion on Wednesday, the day after the election. Elon Musk (Tesla), Jeff Bezos (Amazon), Brian Armstrong (Coinbase), Changpeng Zhao (Binance) and Larry Ellison (Oracle) were among the top gainers, with Musk alone adding $26.5 billion to his net worth in six and a half hours, a pretty good rate of return on the $130m he poured into the Trump campaign. We were treated to the slightly ghastly spectacle of all these people and multiple other Silicon Valley bros lining up and desperately falling over each other to be seen to congratulate Trump in the wake of his crushing victory.
Nine of the ten are based in the U.S., the exception being Bernard Arnault, the French chairman of Louis Vitton Moët Hennessy.
But the 1% in Illinois beware: Voters in the state approved a proposal to add an extra levy on the income of high earners.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
There’s a mountain of articles out there dissecting the election from multiple different perspectives. But please make the time to read this one from Barry Ritholtz, who really knows his st when it comes to financial markets ..
10 Investing Lessons from the 2024 Election.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
After the turmoil of last week, there’s not a lot of respite for investors this week with a pair of inflation reports, retail sales numbers, the tail end of Q3 earnings season and an address from Fed chairman Jerome Powell to navigate this week.
The earnings highlights include results from Home Depot, Cisco, Disney, Shopify, Alibaba, Applied Materials, Spotify, Occidental Petroleum, Sony, Under Armour, Live Nation and Softbank.
The main economic data event of the week will be the release of the October Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation on Wednesday. Estimates calls for a 2.5% increase from a year earlier. The Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers comes out the next day and then Retail Sales data on Friday.
Powell will take part in what will be a closely-watched moderated discussion at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas on Thursday afternoon.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon/Tesla) - up 7.5% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Costco, Procter & Gamble) - up 0.8% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 4.7% last week, is up 25.9% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time record closing high.
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 8.8% last week, is up 18.6% so far this year and ended the week 1.8% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.72%, one month ago: 6.32%, one year ago: 7.50%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be after the Fed’s next meeting on December 18th?
Higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 35% probability (17% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 65% probability (83% a week ago)
0.50% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.625%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 48%, one month ago: 67%, one year ago: 67%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 69%, one month ago: 73%, one year ago: 48%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 42% (39% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 31% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 27% (31% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 15 (Bullish by 8 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial decisions, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind.
Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until a properly-executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
U.S. markets shook off the weekend’s news of Israel’s bombing of Iran and looming political gridlock in Japan and embarked on an incredibly busy earnings and economic data-packed last full week before both the election and the next Fed interest rate decision on a positive note at the open on Monday. Oil prices suffered their biggest one-day fall in over two years on the back of an apparent lack of damage to Iranian oil facilities during Israel’s attack.
This hit the energy sector but most stocks generally got a boost from the retreat in recently-extended oil prices and at least a temporary dip in the geopolitical temperature and the indexes finished the session higher, although off the highs of the day.
Old school names Ford, McDonalds, Xerox, Black & Decker and Jet Blue all issued rather troubling earnings reports which weighed on markets on Tuesday morning. While the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) showed a lower number of open job positions than expected, the Consumer Confidence Index showed a long overdue major leap in how confident consumers feel about what is clearly a really strong U.S. economy.
Stocks liked that and the indexes, led by the NASDAQ, recovered from their early losses to move into the green zone, but in the end the gains were relatively small as traders kept their powder dry ahead of the real business end of the week with the slew of big dog earnings and economic data starting after Tuesday’s closing bell.
Alphabet/Google kicked things off by solidly beating analysts' estimates for earnings and revenue but showed an alarming increase in capital expenditure, much of it AI-related. AMD’s results disappointed and Eli Lilly’s forward guidance was unimpressive. The bigger picture, however, remains vigorous, with Q3 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) coming in at +2.8%, pointing to an economy that’s humming along nicely, with strong consumer spending supported by a robust labor market, and business investment that remains solid.
The net effect on stocks on Wednesday ended up being minimal with the indexes floating around either side of unchanged most of the day, eventually ending the session with light losses.
After hours, we learned that Microsoft’s cloud-computing business and Office software fueled stronger-than-projected revenue growth in Q3 but the company is struggling to bring data centers online fast enough to keep up with demand for AI services. Meta/Facebook failed to beat estimates on revenue despite a decent earnings number and its wearables division (headsets and glasses) continues to rip through ridiculous amounts of cash with apparently very little sign of any light at the end of the tunnel.
The Bank of Japan held interest rates unchanged but the Microsoft and Meta reports gave the broad market no chance and dragged stock prices significantly lower on Thursday and things only got worse when the Fed’s favorite inflation measure, the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index showed some unexpected stickiness in the rate of inflation.
This further hurt the narrative of imminent outsized Fed interest rate cuts. Stocks in general had a bad day (all of the S&P 500’s gains for the month of October were wiped out in the final session of the month) but tech and AI names did even worse, suffering something of a Halloween massacre.
After Thursday’s close Amazon reported better-than-expected earnings and revenue, with Amazon Web Services the standout performer. These days, Wall Street has become accustomed to the Magnificent Seven and other tech and AI-related names not just beating forecasts but absolutely smashing them. This proved to be Apple’s downfall as it reported slightly higher-than-expected earnings and revenues, but the word “slightly” proved to be a problem for the market which sent the stock tumbling in after-hours trading.
On Friday morning before the opening bell, the jewel in the crown of what was a very crowded week of data, the Jobs Report, was released. It showed a heavily-reduced payroll number of just +12k jobs added in October but with the huge caveat that the studied period was very distorted, including two massive hurricanes and significant labor strikes. Big revisions and corrections can be expected in next month’s report. September’s number was revised downwards but the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.1%.
Wall Street saw nothing here likely to derail a quarter point rate cut this week and interest rates fell back and stocks moved higher at the open and held onto those gains all day, but still ended up lower on the week. For the NASDAQ it was the first weekly loss in the last two months.
This week will be absolutely pivotal for markets. The world could be a very different place by the next time you read one of my reports. Or not. The U.S election is on a knife edge and, despite a bit of vocal pro-Trump bravado, Wall Street has absolutely no idea what the result will be. There is a scenario by which the outcome will be vociferously challenged both in the courts and in the streets and Wall Street’s most implacable enemies, uncertainty and disorder, could reign for weeks or possibly even months.
Meantime, the Fed this week needs to read the messy tealeaves of economic data recently tainted by hurricanes and strikes as well as trying to stay out of political trouble with its interest rate decision-making. I don’t envy Powell his job this week.
OTHER NEWS ..
All Change .. Nvidia will finally make an appearance in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, replacing Intel in the index this week. The swap reflects the reversal of fortunes of the two firms within the tech industry. Sherwin-Williams will replace Dow Inc. as well.
S&P Dow Jones Indices, which manages the 30-stock benchmark, said the changes were made to ensure a more representative exposure to the semiconductors industry and the materials sector. They take effect on November 8th.
Democracy Burning? .. Fires deliberately set at ballot boxes in Washington and Oregon destroyed hundreds of ballots in counties with very close races and are being investigated by the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s Office. Law enforcement has identified a vehicle suspected of being used by the firestarter. Meanwhile, conspiracy theorists who still believe Trump won the 2020 election are using Telegram to monitor and film polling places in swing states in an effort that officials say risks intimidating voters and suppressing voter turnout.
Crash! .. Super Micro Computer (SMC) admitted on Wednesday that Ernst & Young (E&Y) had resigned as its auditor. E&Y said in a statement; "We are resigning due to information that has recently come to our attention which has led us to no longer be able to rely on management's and the Audit Committee's representations and to be unwilling to be associated with the financial statements prepared by management".
This information was likely that provided by analyst firm Hindenburg Research which recently disclosed a major short position resulting from claims of rampant "accounting manipulation", which were strongly denied by SMC at the time. The company’s stock (SMCI), already beaten and battered by the Hindenburg report, promptly lost close to half of its remaining value and is now down over 78% from its high recorded just last March.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Sorry, Your Insurance Bill Probably Isn’t Coming Down Much. Here’s Why ..
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week's presidential election will be followed two days later by a Federal Reserve interest-rate-setting decision. There could very well still be some doubt about the outcome (at least in the minds of some people) of the election by the time Fed chairman Jerome Powell steps up to the podium to give his press conference on Thursday. Markets are overwhelmingly pricing in a quarter-point reduction in the federal-funds rate.
Around 100 S&P 500 companies will release quarterly results during the week including CVS, Moderna, BioNTech, Monster Energy, DuPont, Novo Nordisk, Airbnb, Marriott International, Wynn Resorts, Qualcomm, Toyota, Paramount, Warner Bros, Marathon Petroleum and troubled Super Micro Computer.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Communications Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 0.7% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 3.3% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 1.4% last week, is up 20.1% so far this year and ended the week 2.3% below its all-time record closing high (10/18/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 0.1% last week, is up 9.1% so far this year and ended the week 9.7% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.54%, one month ago: 6.12%, one year ago: 7.76%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be after the Fed’s next meeting on November 7th?
Higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 4% probability (5% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 96% probability (95% a week ago)
0.50% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 55%, one month ago: 76%, one year ago: 25%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 72%, one month ago: 77%, one year ago: 33%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 39% (38% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 30% (32% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 31% (30% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 8 (Bullish by 8 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial decisions, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind.
Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until a properly-executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Wall Street appeared rather disinterested on Monday ahead of a busy week of earnings reportsand stocks weakened on the back of some unsurprising, but still low-volume, profit-taking on the back of six straight weeks of gains. Although the tech-heavy NASDAQ made something of a comeback later in the day boosted by a good session for some select tech names including Nvidia, the S&P 500 index still finished in the red.
The flourishing narrative that the Fed is going to be cutting rates less aggressively going forward than originally anticipated as well as the growing expectation in the bond market that the next President will be one who will spend money like a drunken sailor, start a global trading war and jack up the fiscal deficit, the rate of inflation and the probability of the US sliding into a recession sometime in 2025 or 2026 is driving market interest rates higher (and thereby bond prices lower).
This was noticeably on display on Tuesday morning with yields spiking upwards on these worries both in the U.S. and around the world, but particularly in the U.S. 10-year Treasury rate from which most mortgage rates pivot (see the AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE below).
Stocks, particularly Small Cap names, were unnerved by these interest rate gyrations and prices fell at the open, further pressured by disappointing outlooks from Verizon, Lockheed Martin and GE Aerospace. Despite a valiant recovery attempt in the late afternoon, the S&P 500 suffered back-to-back down-days for the first time in 31 trading sessions.
While a month and a half without consecutive negative days may not sound like much, that streak actually ranks among the best since 1928. Such is the stratospheric level of market optimism that we have reached lately.
A continuing move higher in interest rates, ramped up electoral rhetoric, McDonalds’ E. Coli woes (see OTHER NEWS below) and a horrendous Q3 report and outlook from Starbucks negatively impacted stock prices at the open on Wednesday and things only got worse as the session wore on as interest rates kept on climbing and the indexes’ losing run reached three days, not helped by underwhelming earnings reports from IBM, 3M and L’Oréal.
Recent enforced deep price cuts and aggressive sales promotions helped Tesla report better-than-expected earnings after Wednesday’s close. On Thursday, in response to the Tesla news (the stock went on to erase the entirety of its 2024 losses in just one session, despite Wall Street Journal revelations of Musk’s apparent ongoing secret chummy talks with Putin since 2022) as well as some other robust earnings from the likes of economic bellwether UPS and another surprisingly sharp fall in Weekly Jobless Claims, the broad stock market moved mostly higher, snapping the S&P 500’s three-day losing skid. Tech stocks outperformed.
The green on the screen continued into Friday morning as market interest rates finally retreated from recent highs. A major analyst downgrade of Apple took some of the shine off and by the time the closing bell rang the S&P 500 had petered out to finish basically unchanged although the NASDAQ still managed to eke out a gain. Overall, the S&P 500’s six week winning run came to an end but the NASDAQ just about extended its winning streak to seven weeks.
After Friday’s close, Israel started dropping bombs on Tehran and elsewhere in Iran, sending the geopolitical temperature soaring in the Middle East.
It’s important to recognize that much of the good news we’re getting (solid growth, stable earnings, falling inflation) is already reflected in the S&P 500 above 5,800. As such, simply more of the same is not very likely to propel the broad stock market much higher in the near term.
Equally important to understand is that there are still risks to this market. They may currently not be the catastrophic risks of 1) a sudden dramatic slowing of the economy, 2) a spiking resurgence in inflation or 3) a collapse in the quality of earnings reports, any or all of which could cause a serious fall in stock prices.
But lower-level, lower-consequence risks remain, including:
Fewer Fed rate cuts than expected. If data is so good, then the Fed may cut less than expected, both terms of frequency and intensity. The market is pricing in a total of another half a percent of cuts in 2024 and then a consistent cutting cycle in 2025. If that starts to come into doubt, it’ll be a real problem for the rally since it is so baked in.
Geopolitics and Politics. The stock market currently assumes no meaningful degradation in the Russia/ Ukraine war or in the Middle East conflicts and most likely a Trump victory at the polls with a possible red sweep of all branches of government. The geopolitical situation remains tense and unpredictable (see what happened on Friday evening in Iran) and the race for the White House remains extremely tight so the market’s assumptions may well not come to pass and we could be in for a very difficult post-election period (see OTHER NEWS below).
Earnings. Q3 earnings season is off to a generally fine start. But it’s still early and the next two weeks are really the heart of the season. Mediocre (or even just “not great”) reports still have the potential to disappoint markets who could hand out severe punishment to the offending companies.
So, don’t be surprised if a) markets just continue churning at these levels even on the back of more positive news, or b) markets are ultra-sensitive to any sudden, negative surprises and fall harder more than the actual data might warrant.
OTHER NEWS ..
McSickness .. McDonald’s Quarter Pounders (or more specifically the onions used in the sandwich) were linked on Tuesday to an E. Coli outbreak that sickened at least 49 people, mainly in Colorado and Nebraska and killed one, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said. At least ten people were hospitalized, including a child, the agency said. All reported eating at McDonald’s shortly before falling ill and specifically mentioned having eaten a Quarter Pounder, the agency said.
The price of the restaurant chain’s shares dropped more than 10% in after-market trading on Tuesday and continued even lower as the week went on.
Trouble Brewing? .. Trump’s recent improvement in the polls and betting markets now makes it a near-certainty that, should he lose the election next month, he and his supporters will refuse to accept the result and this will likely unleash furious claims of fraud, multiple recount demands, a blizzard of law suits and very possibly organized political violence.
A U.S. intelligence services report just last week warned that Russia is planning to aggressively ferment and encourage such violence in the case of a Harris victory, amplified by outright lies and baseless and dangerous conspiracy nonsense via “friendly” and loosely-monitored social media platforms like X/Twitter, starting on the final days before election day on November 5th and all the way through to a violent climax on inauguration day on January 20th.
This would all inject Wall Street’s worst nightmare, uncertainty, into the equation potentially for an extended period of time after the election itself and cast a shadow over the end of year time period that is historically very strong for stocks. It can be argued that, at these current record-breaking-adjacent levels, stock markets could be severely underestimating the potential political and social chaos that could be generated by this election and its aftermath.
Growth Hiccup? .. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) lowered its global growth forecast for next year and warned of accelerating risks from wars to trade protectionism, state subsidies and tariffs.
It forecasts global GDP to grow by 3.2% in 2025. The biggest GDP growth is predicted to be in India (6.5%), Saudi Arabia (4.6%) and China (4.5%). The U.S. economy is expected to grow by 2.2% next year with Japan and European nations lagging behind that.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Don’t be forced into a financial mistake by the election! A collection of the very best U.S. election-related charts and takeaways from Ritholtz Wealth Management.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week is the biggest of the Q3 earnings season and will feature reports from five of the Magnificent Seven: Alphabet/Google, Amazon, Apple, Meta/Facebook and Microsoft. The bar couldn't be higher, with most of the group sitting on very high valuations and market-beating gains so far his year.
Other big names to report this week include Exxon-Mobil, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Ford, Uber, McDonalds, AMD, Chevron, Mastercard, PayPal, Conoco Phillips, Intel, Caterpillar, Chipotle, eBay, Coinbase and Comcast.
The economic-data highlight of the week will be Friday's Jobs Report for October with an average expectation gain of 108k payrolls, after a 254k increase in September. The unemployment rate is expected to hold steady at 4.1%. Recent large scale hurricanes and strikes, however, could temporarily distort the data and that needs to be borne in mind when reacting.
The latest estimate of Q3 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) comes out on Wednesday and on Thursday the Bank of Japan announces its monetary-policy decision, when it is widely expected to keep the benchmark interest-rate target unchanged at 0.25%.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 0.7% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Sherwin-Williams) - down 3.9% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 1.2% last week, is up 21.8% so far this year and ended the week 1.0% below its all-time record closing high (10/18/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 3.4% last week, is up 9.1% so far this year and ended the week 9.8% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.44%, one month ago: 6.08%, one year ago: 7.79%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be after the Fed’s next meeting on November 7th?
Higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 5% probability (10% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 95% probability (90% a week ago)
0.50% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 76%, one month ago: 64%, one year ago: 14%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 78%, one month ago: 74%, one year ago: 27%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 38% (46% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 32% (29% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 30% (25% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 8 (Bullish by 21 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial decisions, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind.
Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until a properly-executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The market’s positive momentum from the end of the previous week followed through into Monday after a generally quiet weekend on the newswires and with the stock market open but bond markets closed for Columbus Day, trading volume was weak. Prices across the board were bolstered by Fed-speak from a number of committee members and senior officials that was generally pro-steady interest rate cuts. We hit a landmark at the close, there have now been as many new all-time record closing highs this year for the S&P 500 as there have been presidencies in the history of the United States (46).
On Tuesday, Dutch chipmaker ASML Holding’s shares plunged the most in 26 years after it booked only about half the orders that analysts had expected, a startling slowdown for the Dutch company. What made it stranger was that we weren’t supposed to learn that until Wednesday but the high tech firm seemed unable to auto-schedule a press release properly and the information was published a day early (which drew the concerned attention of the regulators). The contagion spread to other names in the sector and, combined with another grim session for energy stocks resulting from the continued swoon in oil prices and some underwhelming earnings reports from UnitedHealth Group (UNH), CVS and Humana, it was a pretty dismal day overall for the indexes.
The financial sector resumed its role as the really bright spot in earnings on Wednesday with Morgan Stanley reporting solid numbers, but United Airlines got in on the act as well with a very positive report. With a reminder that it is actually possible to generate good earnings somewhere other than just in AI, the pendulum swung back in favor of the bulls and stocks ended the day nicely higher.
There was a lot to digest before the opening bell in New York on Thursday morning. The European Central Bank (EBC) duly cut interest rates for the third time this year by 0.25% as expected in an attempt to counter sluggish growth in the region. U.S. Retail Sales rose by more than expected and Weekly Jobless Claims came in way below the expected number.
These data points reinforced the extraordinary strength of the economy right now, so much so that some are now even beginning to question whether any kind of interest rate cut at all is needed at the next Fed meeting in November. We’ve come a long way from the assumption of a second consecutive half point cut from a few weeks ago.
Stocks generally liked what they saw and initially shifted higher but enthusiasm was dampened a little by data showing that Industrial Production fell by more than expected. The indexes spent the day slowly drifting back lower again, finishing the session pretty much unchanged from where they opened.
A Netflix earnings beat and very positive forward guidance from the previous evening cheered the market on Friday morning with the stock surging 10% at the open. Apple pitched in with its iPhone 16 launch apparently going down very well in China. Not such good news at CVS who followed up their miserable earnings report by a C-Suite shakeup and the stock spiraled markedly lower. On a big picture level, however, the major indexes moved upwards - led by the NASDAQ - to achieve a sixth straight week of gains, the longest such streak of the year and closing, once again, at new all-time record highs for the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
The S&P 500 is closing in on 5,900 and it’s obvious to anyone taking any notice that at that level the market is making no allowance whatsoever for any kind of growth slowdown. And to be fair, the economic data recently has been far better than expected and has strongly supported this uber-optimism.
A soft landing remains, by far, the most likely outcome for the economy as important economic data has strengthened across multiple fronts over the past month. It’s not an exaggeration to say this is as positive as the economy has looked all year.
What is of concern to some people is not so much that there is an increasing likelihood of any upcoming growth disappointments (there isn’t), but the extent of the damage that could be done to stock prices if such disappointments were to end up happening at some point, since the market is strongly assuming that they simply won’t come to pass and is very much priced accordingly. There is no buffer at all against evidence of any kind of growth setback. That’s why each piece of major economic data needs to be closely watched.
OTHER NEWS ..
Pension Rankings .. The Netherlands retained its title as the world’s top pension system in an annual international index, which warned that too many people globally are retiring without enough guidance on how to make their savings last. Iceland and Denmark came in second and third respectively.
The report, which rates retirement systems based on their adequacy, sustainability and integrity, said while those at the top are performing well, there are demographic challenges for pensions worldwide. “We’re just not having babies and we’re living longer,” David Knox, the report’s lead author, said.
The U.S., as usual, did terribly and ranked 29th out of 48, behind most of Western Europe, parts of Asia and Canada and Mexico.
Expensive Magic .. Walt Disney Co. is increasing ticket prices for its two Southern California theme parks by about 6% on most days. The most expensive tickets (typically weekends and holidays) are climbing over 6% to $206 per day. The lowest-priced admission, available for at least 15 days in January and February, will stay at $104, unchanged since 2019.
However, for a cool $400 per person, guests at Disney theme parks can skip the long lines at popular attractions such as the Indiana Jones and Star Wars: Rise of the Resistance rides. Resorts in Southern California and Florida will begin testing the Lightning Lane Premier Pass later this month.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The math behind why younger investors should be frantically hoping for a really big stock market crash.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The week will be packed with corporate news, as about one-in-five S&P 500 companies publish their Q3 results, including Tesla, T-Mobile, Coca-Cola, Verizon, Colgate-Palmolive, AT&T, UPS, Southwest Airlines, Honeywell, General Motors, Lockheed martin, 3M, Newmont and NextEra Energy.
Economic-data highlights of the week include the latest Existing Home Sales data for September and the Durable Goods report.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - up 3.5% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 2.6% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 0.9% last week, is up 23.0% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time record closing high.
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 2.0% last week, is up 12.4% so far this year and ended the week 7.0% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.32%, one month ago: 6.09%, one year ago: 7.63%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be after the Fed’s next meeting on November 7th?
Higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 10% probability (11% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 90% probability (89% a week ago)
0.50% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 75%, one month ago: 73%, one year ago: 21%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 77%, one month ago: 75%, one year ago: 38%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 46% (49% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 29% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 25% (21% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 21 (Bullish by 28 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial decisions, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind.
Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Stocks began the week nervously on Monday with tit-for-tat attacks further raising the geopolitical temperature in the Middle East and the resulting continued move higher in oil prices to above $80. Things just grew more dismal as the session wore on with analysts issuing rare downgraded outlooks for both Apple and Amazon. Yet another massive destructive storm began to take aim at Florida, which crushed the prices of insurance company stocks, particularly those with large exposure to the region. The indexes all finished the day significantly lower.
Chinese markets spectacularly crashed off from their recent sugar high after coming back from a week’s holiday on the back of a letdown regarding the next stage of stimulus, dragging European stocks lower. But Wall Street shrugged it off when the bell rang on Tuesday morning and set about trying to repair the previous day’s damage, doing a good job and erasing Monday’s losses with tech leading the charge higher. The energy sector, however, slumped as oil prices reversed sharply lower.
Stocks opened slightly softer on Wednesday following a report that the U.S. Justice Department is considering a breakup of Alphabet/Google, signaling a possible broad antitrust crackdown on Big Tech and more labor trouble at crisis-hit Boeing. The mood improved as the session went on with eyes on the CPI inflation numbers the next day and PPI the day after.
The minutes from the previous Fed rate-setting meeting were released in the afternoon and we learned that there had been pretty robust debate at the meeting between the Half-Point Cutters and the Quarter-Pointers and that the decision to go with the half point reduction was a lot tighter than it initially appeared. Stocks were too busy rallying hard to take much notice though and the S&P 500 closed at its 44th all-time record high of the year.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for September was released pre-market on Thursday. It came in a touch hotter than expected at an annualized rate of +2.4%. Weekly jobless claims spiked much higher to +258k, but temporary distortions due to Hurricane Helene were likely a major factor and that could also be repeated with this week’s data because of Milton as well as the labor dispute at Boeing. Stocks initially drifted a little lower in response and stayed depressed during what was a bland session overall.
Friday began with the release of the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers which contrasted with CPI by coming in a touch cooler than expected; prices were unchanged over the month of September and +1.8% annualized rate.
Q3 earnings season kicked off with sparkling reports from JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Blackrock and Bank of New York Mellon but after Elon Musk gave a typically awkward, evasive and detail-light report on Tesla’s “Cyber-Cab” plans (remember, he once promised that a million of them would be on the road by 2020) which totally underwhelmed Wall Street and the stock was severely punished.
The solid earnings news from the financial names plus the PPI number mostly neutralizing the slight concerns raised by CPI the day before sent all the indexes floating higher (led by Small Caps) and the S&P 500 closed the week at all-time record high #45 of the year.
There is a lot of noise out there right now and it’s going to stay that way with the election less than a month away. The best way to cut through that noise and not get distracted by scary and unsettling headlines is to stay focused exclusively on the three key drivers of this market: 1) economic soft landing, 2) Fed interest rate cuts and 3) stable earnings. As long as news regarding those items stays positive, stocks could well remain resilient.
Stable economic growth remains, by far, the most important influence on this market and as long as growth is solid, that’s a major support for stocks even at these high valuations.
On the Fed, market expectations are volatile as investors consistently talk themselves into more aggressively-interest-rate-cutting Fed policy, but it’s a trap to get caught up in that. The best-case scenario for investors is consistent but measured set of rate cuts that support stable growth.
Earnings reports remain somewhat mixed but they simply aren’t bad enough to offset solid growth or Fed rate cuts. Looking forward, earnings will be a much bigger focus of markets over the next three weeks and the key here is not so much the backward-looking sales and revenue data, but forward-looking guidance. Unless this guidance is much worse than expected and is so bad that it offsets the positives of solid growth and steady interest rate cuts, earnings reports of themselves are unlikely to be the main cause of any pullback.
OTHER NEWS ..
Hindenburg is back .. The latest target of Hindenburg, the research firm whose reports have recently rocked shares of firms owned by billionaire-investor Carl Icahn, India's Gautam Adani, as well as AI-server maker Super Micro Computer for exposed financial shenanigans is Roblox, the gaming platform popular among young children.
Hindenburg found that Roblox lied to investors, regulators, and advertisers about the number of people on its platform, inflating the key metric by 25-42% by deliberately conflating daily active users with the number of people simply visiting its site and also counting bots as legit users. The firm was also accused of failing to protect child gamers from an apparently large presence of in-game pedophile predators. After the report was published on Tuesday, Roblox stock plunged 10% in a matter of minutes.
Crypto Fraud Has Not Gone Away .. Three cryptocurrency companies and about a dozen individuals were charged with market manipulation and fraud as part of a wide-ranging investigation by U.S. authorities that included setting up a fake crypto firm and over 60 effectively non-existent cryptocurrencies. ZM Quant, CLS Global and MyTrade all conspired to make fake trades to boost the price and appearance of activity of the made-up tokens, according to federal prosecutors in Boston.
Distortions Coming .. Two massive hurricanes and (albeit brief) East Coast port closures during the studied period will likely impact upcoming economic data. While this will need to be taken into account when looking at imminent economic numbers, distortions can continue long into the future since such events can trigger later rebuilding activity, increased insurance costs to consumers and localized inflation.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Josh Brown and I share the same investment principles and the same things annoy us both. But Josh is also a much better writer than me and he explains it all really well here.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Q3 earnings season ramps up this week, with nearly one in ten S&P 500 companies scheduled to report including Netflix, Taiwan SemiConductor, American Express, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs Group, Morgan Stanley, Proctor & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, United Airlines Holdings, UnitedHealth Group, ASML Holding, Walgreens Boots Alliance and Prologis.
On Thursday, the European Central Bank (ECB) is expected to deliver its third 0.25% interest rate cut since June, taking its benchmark rate target to 3.25%.
Most of the economic data to watch this week is housing-related but we will also see the latest Retail Sales report on Thursday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Nvidia) - up 2.2% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 2.8% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.0% last week, is up 21.9% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time record closing high.
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 0.9% last week, is up 10.2% so far this year and ended the week 8.8% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.12%, one month ago: 6.20%, one year ago: 7.57%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be after the Fed’s next meeting on November 7th?
Higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 11% probability (7% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 89% probability (93% a week ago)
0.50% lower than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 74%, one month ago: 65%, one year ago: 32%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 76%, one month ago: 69%, one year ago: 43%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 49% (46% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 30% (27% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 21% (27% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 28 (Bullish by 19 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial decisions, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind.
Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Q3 came to an end last week with the S&P 500 pulling off its best first three quarters in any year since 1997. It also completed its fourth straight quarterly gain, the longest such stretch since 2021.
It marked the beginning of a crucial and potentially volatile five week period in the lead-up to a knife-edge election and the next Fed meeting right afterwards during which time we will get to see multiple new economic data points including two Jobs Reports and one set of CPI/PPI inflation figures which could indicate whether Wall Street’s recent happy-clappy assumptions are correct (at which point the resulting stock market gains become further supported) or if they were overly optimistic (at which point anything from a 5% to 10% pullback could easily happen).
Proceedings kicked off on a downbeat note on Monday in the final trading session of the month and the quarter, following a big slide in Japanese stocks after a new prime minister was appointed, a dire German economic outlook, zero signs of any easing of the violence in the Middle East and the prospect of a massive strike by over 25,000 dockworkers at many East Coast and Gulf shipping ports for the first time in 50 years.
The indexes were in the red for most of the session but actually finished a touch higher after a late-day surge took the S&P 500 to yet another new all-time record high, boosted by more promising rhetoric on upcoming interest rate cuts in a speech from Fed chairman Jerome Powell as well as quarter-end almost literally last-minute portfolio adjustments by professional money managers.
The final quarter of 2024 started out with stocks under pressure on Tuesday as Israel moved troops into Lebanon with Iran launching (mostly ineffective) retaliatory attacks which spiked the prices of oil and other commodities and also the dockworkers strike began. The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) showed an unexpected jump in job vacancies but a fall in the rate at which Americans feel able to quit their jobs.
After being pulled meaningfully lower early in the session, most of the indexes moderated their losses in the afternoon, although the partial recovery was absent among the higher valuation names such as those in tech and AI which remained stuck notably lower.
A tediously cordial vice presidential debate on Tuesday night seemed unlikely to move any needles and Wall Street had already brushed it off as irrelevant by the time the opening bell rang on Wednesday morning. The focus was more on the Middle East with some investors beginning to draw a line from the escalation of the conflict to commodity price increases and then all the way through to a possible increase in U.S. inflation.
As the day wore on, markets decided that, for the time being at least, the risks of contagion in the Middle East were somewhat limited and decided to take a wait-and-see attitude and the result was a nothing burger of a session with the indexes unchanged.
Thursday was another choppy but mostly inconclusive session with a slightly negative outcome as oil prices continued their relentless march higher, experiencing their biggest daily jump in over a year. Most of the market’s attention, however, was focused on positioning for the Jobs Report the following morning. After the close, the dockworkers’ strike was suspended following an improved wage offer.
The unveiling of the Jobs Report finally took place before the open on Friday morning. Given that the Fed is now cutting interest rates, it is important that economic data points like this continue to reinforce the soft landing narrative.
It was an astonishingly strong report, with +254k new payrolls that obliterated estimates of +147k, the previous month was revised upwards and the unemployment rate fell from 4.3% to 4.1% (in fact, very close to 4.0% when you look at the rounding). Average hourly earnings were also higher than expected.
This monster upside surprise that points to an incredibly strong economy completely demolished market bets on another jumbo half point interest rate cut next time around at the Fed’s November 7th meeting (see the dramatic weekly changes in the FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below), with a quarter point reduction now considered a near-certainty, although - as mentioned earlier - there will be a lot of new inflation data, one more Jobs Report and an election before then.
Wall Street loved the blowout report, ripping higher at the opening bell, led by tech and Small Caps. The giddiness subsided a little as the session went on as it dawned on investors that they were now likely not going to get the second jumbo rate cut that they had been hoping for, but stocks still finished the day nicely higher and with slight gains for the week.
OTHER NEWS ..
Not-So-Smart Money .. Harvard University’s once-legendary endowment fund is now close to a laughing stock after two decades of poor returns. Your average office worker throwing a few dollars into a target date fund in their 401k every two weeks has comfortably outperformed the Harvard Endowment over that time and certainly paid much lower fees.
The dreadful performance stems from a classic investment mistake: shifting strategies and fund managers at the absolute worst times, otherwise known a chasing shiny objects and paying exorbitant fees to outside advisors and hedge funds for extremely lackluster results.
The endowment remains the biggest in higher education but that may not last much longer as the University of Texas system is being turbocharged by oil revenue.
“Don’t Fall For The Hype” ..AI will only replace 5% of jobsperformed by humans, and will be far from the game-changer that the media and Big Tech is constantly telling us it will be, according to MIT economist Daron Acemoglu. “A lot of money is going to get wasted.” Acemoglu said. He predicted that the frenzy could build for another year or so, but AI could then collapse under the bloated weight of its own deluded self-importance after driving up corporate costs much faster than it improves revenues and that could lead to disenchantment among investors, employees, executives and students who quickly flee.
Frozen .. Just 2.5% of homes in the US changed hands this year in the first eight months, the lowest turnover rate in over 30 years, according an analysis by Redfin. The latest data underscores just how much the housing market has become frozen in 2024 as Americans faced a toxic combination of record-high home prices and elevated mortgage rates, creating one of the most unaffordable housing markets in generations.
A big interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve this month has fueled hopes that the interest rate-sensitive housing market will soon experience a fresh jolt, but that still remains to be seen (mortgage rates are no lower now than they were on the day the Fed made the cut).
Genius? Yeah, Right .. The value of X, formerly known as Twitter, has crashed by 79% since supposed genius Elon Musk bought it just two years ago. A newly-released disclosure report from Fidelity’s Blue Chip Growth Fund, which has an equity stake in the social media company, has once again adjusted the value of that holding based on transactional data. By Fidelity’s calculations, the company is now worth $9.4 billion dollars versus the $44 billion that Musk paid for it.
The news will come as a blow to another major X shareholder, Sean Combs, although he’s currently facing bigger problems, behind bars charged with sex trafficking, assault and rape involving scores of women and young girls.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
That 5% CD Is a Great Deal. Until the Bank Calls It Back.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Q3 earnings season kicks off this week, with results from major U.S. financial institutions like JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of New York Mellon and Blackrock and several other big companies like Pepsico and Delta Airlines.
On Thursday morning, the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation will come out, with an expectation of a 2.3% increase from a year earlier after a 2.5% reading a month before. The Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers is released a day later.
Market nerds like me will also be paying close attention to the minutes from the Fed's September interest rate meeting on Wednesday. There will be plenty of interest in the details of the debate over whether to lower interest rates by a quarter or a half of a percentage point, which this time around included some rare dissent.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 7.0% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Sherwin Williams) - down 2.0% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 0.2% last week, is up 20.6% so far this year and ended the week 0.3% below its all-time record closing high (09/30/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 0.6% last week, is up 9.2% so far this year and ended the week 9.7% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.08%, one month ago: 6.40%, one year ago: 7.50%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be after the Fed’s next meeting on November 7th?
Higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 3% probability (0% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 97% probability (46% a week ago)
0.50% lower than now .. 0% probability (54% a week ago)
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 83%, one month ago: 70%, one year ago: 11%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 80%, one month ago: 71%, one year ago: 37%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 46% (49% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 27% (27% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 27% (24% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 19 (Bullish by 25 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial decisions, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind.
Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The final full week of September is historically on average the worst-performing week of the year for U.S. stocks. This time round, a very limited amount of consequential economic data ahead of the latest inflation reading on Friday and only a handful of earnings reports left the market feeling untethered and drifting, at the mercy of some notoriously unpredictable moving targets such as trader sentiment, global geopolitics, an erratic U.S. election campaign that feels like it could go off the rails at any moment, a looming government shutdown and lots and lots of Fed-Speak, with at least eight central bank officials, including chairman Jerome Powell on Thursday, scheduled to make speeches or participate in conferences during the week.
The Chinese central bank made a surprising cut in one of its key interest rates over the weekend as part of a massive package of moves to give an adrenaline shot to a rapidly cooling economy. There was more appalling carnage in the Middle East.
U.S. stocks, however, began the week by floating gently higher in a rather humdrum session on Monday on the back of the still high market-driven probability of yet another half point interest rate cut in November resulting from some very pro-rate cut Fed-speak from rate-setting committee members, Austan Goolsbee and Raphael Bostic. The S&P 500 index notched its 40th all-time record high close of the year.
It was more of the same on Tuesday. Tech stocks led markets higher, partly on the back of all the Chinese stimulus news, to all-time record high #41 of 2024 for the S&P 500. This was despite some evidence of declining consumer confidence and Fed-Speak from Governor Michelle Bowman, the only policymaker to dissent on the recent 0.50% cut, who said that the central bank should lower interest rates “at a measured pace” . Sounds like Michelle is still unconvinced by this whole jumbo half point cut malarkey.
Some air was let out of the balloon on Wednesday as the dearth of any significant data or earnings-based catalysts continued and investors maybe got a little bout of vertigo at the elevated stock price levels achieved over the last few weeks and decided to back off a bit for a while. In the background, the growing prospect of an Israeli ground invasion in Lebanon started raising serious geopolitical concerns. The indexes all finished lower, erasing most of Monday and Tuesday’s record-breaking gains.
Stock prices were strongly buoyed on Thursday morning by a very healthy Q2 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) final estimate of 3.0% annualized, robust sales forecasts from Micron (the stock surged 20% in a matter of minutes), a better-than-expected pre-market weekly jobless claims number, a further super-charging of the Chinese stimulus package and the emergence of a possible Israel/Lebanon 21-day ceasefire proposal.
Although markets gave some back later in the session as Netanyahu appeared to torpedo ceasefire hopes, the plethora of good news prevailed and Jerome Powell offered an optimistic picture of the economy in a major speech. It was another up-day across the board for stocks and yet again an all-time record closing high for the S&P 500.
The most impactful piece of data of the week hit the newswires before the opening bell on Friday. The latest Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) Price Index, which the Fed uses to judge where it believes inflation to really be, came in as expected at 2.2% annualized, still very close to the central bank’s 2.0% target number and clearing the path for more large and/or frequent interest rate cuts by keeping the Goldilocks narrative intact.
After initially reacting very positively in response to this data, stocks settled back into a holding pattern and ended basically unchanged for the session but largely higher for the week.
We cannot get into the minds of Fed interest rate-setting committee members to know what they are thinking, but if I had to guess I’d say it’s something like .. “If inflation was caused by the pandemic, stimulus spending and now-resolved supply chain issues and all those are now gone and inflation is pretty much back at 2%, then why do we need to have interest rates so high?”
To use a simple analogy, it’s like we were in a car hurtling down a steep hill. The Fed had to ride the brakes to stop inflation and make sure the car didn’t get out of control. But now the economy is back on a flat road and the Fed still has a foot on the brakes. If they don’t let off, the car will eventually stop (= a recession).
This is where the market’s strong conviction in more jumbo half point interest rate cuts before the end of the year and into 2025 comes from (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below), despite the Fed itself only projecting a total of a half point cut across the remaining couple of meetings of 2024.
Either financial markets will be disappointed or the Fed will be bullied by Wall Street into cutting rates more than it would instinctively like. We’ll find out soon enough and one big clue will be this week’s Jobs Report.
OTHER NEWS ..
Higher And Higher .. As of Friday and measured by the S&P 500 index, the U.S. stock market had moved higher in 36 weeks of the last 52, which puts it in the best 5% ever of one year periods since 1957 by this count. On average, the S&P 500 tends to go up in 30 weeks per year.
The takeaway: as long as the economy is growing, the U.S. is adding jobs, corporate earnings are powering higher, and inflation isn’t a five-alarm fire, stocks have the capability to shake off any number of seemingly unsettling headlines and continue to march higher.
Not So Simple .. Conventional wisdom says that Wall Street likes split government (no one party controlling all of the House, Senate and presidency) since the resulting potential for gridlock maintains the status quo and reduces the seismic shifts and uncertainty that Wall Street detests.
However it’s not quite that simple. A split government does indeed mean that large scale policy changes (such as widespread tariffs, significant welfare or immigration reform, etc.) become less likely, but it also increases ongoing government shutdown risk and possibility that the Trump tax cuts will all completely expire at the end of next year. This will have basically the same effect as the shock of a sudden massive tax hike and could be damaging to businesses and markets.
On the other hand, a sweep certainly increases the possibility of performative, ill-considered and damaging colossal policy changes but - depending who it is that sweeps - could allow an extension or at least more thought-out and controlled amendments to some of the expiring tax cuts, thereby avoiding the de facto tax shock that frightens financial markets.
Massive Fashion Emergency .. Seems AI can’t get everything right. Wednesday was a mediocre day for the market in general, but it was a truly atrocious session for one-time highflier Stitch Fix. The stock plunged almost 40% in minutes and its market value fell to just $277 million, having peaked at $10 billion in early 2021 - a fall of over 97%. The company went public in 2017, promising to make customers look snappy in clothing selected for them by an AI-assisted algorithm.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The most common outcome from buying a stock is that you lose all your money. Also stocks broadly have very positive, long-term expected returns.
Huh? How can those two things both be true? Here’s how.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The September jobs data provides this week's highlights. The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) comes out on Tuesday. It's expected to show a roughly unchanged number of unfilled positions at the end of August.
But the week's main event will be the Jobs Report on Friday. The consensus estimate is for an increase of 145k payrolls in September, slightly more than in August. The unemployment rate is expected to hold steady at 4.2%. Americans' average hourly earnings are forecast to be up 3.8% from a year earlier.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Basic Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Sherwin Williams) - up 3.0% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 1.8% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 0.4% last week, is up 20.2% so far this year and ended the week 0.1% below its all-time record closing high (09/26/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 0.6% last week, is up 9.8% so far this year and ended the week 9.2% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.09%, one month ago: 6.40%, one year ago: 7.31%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be after the Fed’s next meeting on November 7th?
Higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 46% probability (49% a week ago)
0.50% lower than now .. 54% probability (51% a week ago)
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 77%, one month ago: 77%, one year ago: 15%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 75%, one month ago: 77%, one year ago: 27%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 49% (51% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 27% (23% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 24% (26% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 25 (Bullish by 25 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial decisions, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The main focus of markets was on the week’s interest rate announcements from the heavyweight central banks in London, Tokyo and, of course, a highly consequential one in Washington DC on Wednesday afternoon, which finally resolved the passionate, frenzied “Will be it be 25 or 50?” debate of the last few weeks.
More data over the weekend confirming the accelerating deterioration of the Chinese economy which wasn’t helped by the biggest typhoon since 1949 smashing into Shanghai on a holiday weekend and another apparent attempt on Trump’s life provided a slightly jittery backdrop when U.S. markets opened on Monday morning.
Not much happened in Monday’s session with stocks mostly playing a waiting game. The S&P 500 ended fractionally higher for a sixth straight trading day of gains and Small Caps moved handily upwards. Tech/AI stocks, however, reversed course a bit after the previous week’s spectacular fiesta.
The futures market-driven odds of a jumbo half point interest rate cut over a quarter point one on Wednesday afternoon continued to climb rapidly throughout the day and actually moved into the ascendancy with a 67% probability by the close, having been as low as 15% just a week earlier.
This renewed optimistic buzz about a possible half-point cut the following day bolstered stock prices on Tuesday morning, Fed Eve. Also helpful was the pre-market release of Retail Sales and Industrial Production data which both came in better than expected. Later in the session, however, doubts crept in on fears that “only” a quarter point cut might actually trigger market disappointment and drag prices lower as a result. Stocks retreated to close essentially unchanged on the day.
Fed Day finally arrived on Wednesday along with developing fears of a further escalation in the Middle East resulting from two days of deadly electronic device attacks in Lebanon. Traders managed to sit on their hands in advance of the 2pm ET rate announcement and the 2:30pm ET Fed chair Jerome Powell’s press conference.
In the end, the Fed went with the big cut of 0.50%, lowering the Fed Funds rate to 4.875% and released its projections for the months and years ahead. There was a note of dissent from committee member and Fed Governor Michelle Bowman who voted for only a quarter point cut (see OTHER NEWS below).
The Fed committee’s median estimate for where interest rates will be at the end of 2024 after two more meetings was 4.375% and then down to 3.375% by the end of 2025. That’s two more quarter point cuts before year-end and then another four more next year. The median projections for the unemployment rate were for an imminent slight increase to 4.4% and then staying unchanged in 2025.
There was an inevitable bounce in markets immediately following the announcement. Powell went out of his way in the press conference to emphasize that “nobody should assume that this is the new pace” for rate reductions going forward.
Fears resurfaced that the decision to make the bigger cut could indicate that the Fed was just scrambling to recover lost ground having waited too long and may have lost control of the economy. Despite Wall Street having apparently got exactly what it wanted, stocks still finished the session in the red and mortgage interest rates (that are tied most closely to the 10 year Treasury rate, not the Fed Funds rate) actually shifted higher on the day.
As expected, the Bank of England (BOE) left local interest rates unchanged, but promised “gradual cuts” going forward. In something of a delayed reaction, “upon further review” of the Fed’s jumbo cut the day before, U.S. stock markets sent prices sky-rocketing out of the gate on Thursday morning with Tech/AI names in charge of ripping higher. The cheery mood continued all day and we closed at another new all-time record high for the S&P 500, the 39th such milestone this year.
The euphoria faded somewhat on Friday. A dreadful earnings report and dismal outlook from economic bellwether Fedex causing the company’s stock price to plunge and ever-growing Middle East tensions didn’t help. The Bank of Japan ended up leaving interest rates unchanged.
Stocks in general gave back a small part of Thursday’s big gains in an ultra-high volume session (brought about by index rebalancing and mass futures and option contract expirations), but the major indexes still managed to show respectable gains for the week.
OTHER NEWS ..
Not Very Fine People On Both Sides .. Crass ignorance and naked politicking was openly on display from all ends of the spectrum last week when politicians decided to weigh in on where the Fed Funds interest rate should be. Before Wednesday’s half point rate cut, Senator Elizabeth Warren led many Democrats in an absurd demand for at least a 0.75% cut.
After the 0.50% cut was announced, spurred on by Trump, many Republicans floated the preposterous notion that the Fed was acting politically to specifically benefit the Biden administration/Harris campaign, ignoring the reality that, even if that were the case (which it obviously isn’t), such measures take a lot longer than seven weeks to be felt by any voters.
The Fed ignored all this idiotic politically-driven nonsense, of course, and will continue to do as long as it is able to maintain its position as independent of presidents and lawmakers.
And all the while, these are the same politicians who are happily letting the clock tick down towards a potential shutdown of the U.S. government and who - within hours of the Fed’s rate cut announcement - voted down a stop-gap funding bill for reasons of blatant political grandstanding.
Finally Some Dissent .. At Wednesday’s Fed interest rate setting committee meeting, Michelle Bowman cast the first dissenting vote by a Federal Reserve governor since 2005, preferring to cut rates by a smaller amount.
The Fed cut rates by half a percentage point, while Bowman was in favor of quarter point cut, according a statement by the central bank. She has always remained cautious about inflation.
Dissents at the Fed have been rare, especially during Chair Jerome Powell’s tenure. The last one came from a regional bank president in June 2022, when Esther George, then chief of the Kansas City Fed, dissented in favor of raising rates by a smaller amount.
#1 .. The Capella Hotel in Bangkok topped the list of the world’s best hotels released last week, finishing ahead of last year’s winner, the Passalacqua in Lake Como which took second place this time around. The highest rated U.S.-based hotel was the Carlyle in New York City which came in at #30.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The evidence is that simply chasing dividend-paying stocks just doesn’t work.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
A pretty quiet week ahead, data-wise. The main event will be the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index for August which comes out on Friday. The consensus call is for a 2.3% increase from a year earlier.
It will, however, be a busy week of commentary and clipped quotes from Fed officials, as several of them hit the speaker circuit following the central bank's decision last week to cut interest rates by half a percent.
The small number of earnings reports coming out this week include those from Costco, AutoZone, Micron Technology, Accenture, CarMax and Vail Resorts.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 3.6% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor & Gamble, Costco) - down 1.3% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.1% last week, is up 19.6% so far this year and ended the week 0.5% below its all-time record closing high (09/19/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 2.4% last week, is up 10.4% so far this year and ended the week 4.1% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.20%, one month ago: 6.46%, one year ago: 7.19%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be after the Fed’s next meeting on November 7th?
Higher than now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Unchanged from now .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
0.25% lower than now .. 49% probability (61% a week ago)
0.50% lower than now .. 51% probability (39% a week ago)
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 4.875%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 72%, one month ago: 73%, one year ago: 27%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 73%, one month ago: 73%, one year ago: 32%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 51% (40% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 23% (29% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 26% (31% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 25 (Bullish by 9 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Last week’s big data points were mostly inflation-related with the release of CPI and PPI, but all of a sudden inflation is no longer the big issue it used to be. The trajectory is very much set and meaningful unexpected bombshells are considered rather unlikely, which was borne out in the data on Wednesday and Thursday.
There was also the small matter of the presidential debate, with both candidates beginning to finally tease some actual economic policies that will provide more daylight between them and on which Wall Street can begin to make some financial judgements and, of course, the ever-present potential for implosion by one or the other candidate.
Markets rebounded nicely on Monday following the anguish of the previous week. Buyers finally seemed confident enough to dip their toes back in and snap up stocks at perceived bargain prices, including - but not limited to - names in the heavily beaten-down tech space. However, Apple’s desperate attempts to make their rah-rah product launch event seem even slightly interesting or relevant failed dismally and the stock did not participate in the market rally.
Chinese stocks hit a five-year low in the Asian session on Tuesday. Ahead of the evening’s presidential debate, U.S. markets were on edge particularly the energy and banking sectors (negatively impacted respectively by oil prices flirting with three year lows and some lousy future profit and margin forward guidance from some of the big banks) but the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ indexes still managed to eke out moderate gains.
The presidential debate on Tuesday evening was all heat and zero light with more time spent talking about the apparently routine execution of new-born babies and the eating of cats and dogs on the streets of Ohio than on providing any kind of new information or clarity on either candidate’s economic plans. Wall Street rolled its eyes and quickly moved on to the first piece of inflation data that was released pre-market on Wednesday.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation came out as expected with the headline annualized rate moving lower from 2.9% to 2.5%. Under the hood, housing/shelter is the largest component of the calculation and moved higher (which was a little concerning) as did air fares/hotels, but food/groceries were flat.
When you take the average annualized inflation rate over the last six months, it’s now basically at the Fed’s target rate of 2.0% and over the last three months it’s actually down as low as 1.1%. Inflation is clearly now under control and the IMO already rather flimsy case for a “jumbo” 0.50% interest rate cut faded, leaving a 0.25% lowering on Wednesday as the favored outcome.
After initial investor disappointment that the jumbo cut likely wasn’t going to happen, an impressive tech/AI-powered afternoon recovery in stocks put lots of green on the screen by the close.
An avalanche of data dropped before the opening bell on Thursday morning. The European Central Bank (ECB) cut local interest rates by 0.25% as expected and the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers mostly confirmed its CPI cousin’s benign findings, falling from an annualized 2.2% to 1.7%. Weekly Initial Jobless Claims also came in unchanged and as anticipated.
The stock market reaction was initially muted with some light gains but the rally gathered pace as the day went on as traders processed what was really very rosy inflation data and the impending interest rate cut and the indexes all finished substantially higher for a fourth straight day of gains.
The stock market scored a clean sweep for the week after finishing higher on Friday with the jumbo interest rate cut proponents getting a boost from a rather surprising Wall Street Journal report that apparently the 0.25% vs. 0.50% rate cut debate is still live at the Fed and the market-driven probability of the bigger cut rocketed higher from as low as 15% earlier in the week and it’s now pretty much a coin flip again which it will be. Small Caps were by far the biggest beneficiaries.
Despite (or in fact even because of) an excellent week for the indexes, the stock market still has a problem and it isn’t so much the economic growth rate, it’s high valuations relative to historical norms and the resulting risk asymmetry that I talked about last week. A soft landingstill remains far more likely than a hard landing, but Wall Street remains way too optimistic for the existing growth reality, not because that reality is so bad, but instead because current valuations are so stretched.
The economic environment is deteriorating but is not yet “nasty.” However, the stock market isn’t priced for a “just ok” environment, it’s priced for a spectacularly good one and that disconnect remains a near-term risk for investors.
OTHER NEWS ..
Euro Losers ..Apple lost its court fight over a $14.4 billion invoice for back taxes in Ireland and Google lost its challenge over a $2.7 billion fine for abusing its market power in a big win for the European Union’s crackdown on big tech. The court decisions are victories for EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager just weeks before the end of her second term. The Apple decision was by far the biggest in her decade-long campaign for tax equivalence and fairness in the EU, which has also targeted the likes of Amazon.
Who’s Buying My House? .. Businessman Leo Kryss is suing real estate company Douglas Elliman over the $79 million sale of his Florida mansion, a 7-bedroom, 11.5-bathroom home in Miami, FLA to Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, one of the world’s richest people.
Kryss claims that he asked Douglas Elliman CEO Jay Parker point-blank if Bezos was behind the purchase. Parker allegedly "misleadingly assured Kryss that Bezos was not behind the offer and was not the purchaser," according to the lawsuit. Clearly, the seller thinks that, had he known that Bezos was the buyer, he could have held out for a higher price.
It’s Baaaaaack! .. I literally cannot believe that this topic is rearing its extraordinarily ugly head again but a government shutdown on September 30th is back on the table. House Speaker Johnson canceled a planned vote on Wednesday on a stopgap government funding measure after facing opposition from fellow Republicans.
The proposal would have extended government funding through March 28th and avoided, at least temporarily, a partial government shutdown just weeks before the general election. Johnson was aiming to kick the spending bill ahead six months, when funding levels could be decided under a new administration and a new Congress.
Numerous lawmakers raised objections to the measure, which attached a requirement that people have to show proof of U.S. citizenship to vote. That requirement was almost certain to doom the bill in the Senate, where Democrats hold a majority. Republicans resisted Johnson’s bill either because it didn’t cut spending or because Trump instructed members to refuse to pass any government funding that did not include some kind of a list of measures on what he calls election security. This could run and run.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Who are more despicable? The online scammers or the social media platform providers that aid and abet them, earning billions of dollars as a result? Why do we still put up with this s*t?*
Maybe more importantly, how long should the FBI put up with it before they start raiding the headquarters of the likes of Meta/Facebook, X/Twitter etc. and start holding senior executives liable?
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Bring on the Fed! The highly anticipated interest-rate decision by the Federal Reserve will be this week's highlight. Policymakers have signaled they will cut rates at this meeting, which ends on Wednesday afternoon, but there remains uncertainty about whether it will be by a quarter of a percentage point or by a half point (see above).
Importantly, officials will also present their latest quarterly “Dot Plot” with their updated economic and interest rate projections for the coming months and years.
We will also get Retail Sales data for August. Those are forecast to be relatively unchanged during the month. And on Friday, the Bank of Japan is expected to keep its benchmark interest rate target unchanged at 0.25%.
There’ll be a small handful of earnings reports this week including from Fedex, General Mills and Lennar.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Nvidia, Microsoft) - up 8.0% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 0.4% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 3.9% last week, is up 18.2% so far this year and ended the week 0.5% below its all-time record closing high (07/16/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 4.4% last week, is up 8.0% so far this year and ended the week 10.6% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.35%, one month ago: 6.48%, one year ago: 7.18%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 100% probability (100% a week ago)
No .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.125% (implying five rate cuts), one month ago: 4.375% (implying four rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 58%, one month ago: 59%, one year ago: 32%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 67%, one month ago: 68%, one year ago: 47%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 40% (45% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 29% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 31% (25% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 9 (Bullish by 20 week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Septembers can often be tricky as professional stock traders begin to liquidate some of their positions ahead of the year-end with tax considerations, regulatory filings and the process of locking in profits in mind. This becomes even more of a potential issue with the S&P 500 starting the month so close to its all-time highs and an economic soft landing entirely assumed without any questions asked.
This has created something of an “asymmetry of risk” where there is greater potential for stocks to fall further on any disappointments than there is for them to rise on any upside surprises. The effect is a skewed environment where the stock market will tend to be constantly stressing about landmines everywhere represented by multiple data points. The result was a miserable week for all risk assets, by some measures the worst since the dark days of late 2022.
Wall Street reopened on Tuesday after the Labor Day long weekend in an anxious mood ahead of a week of primarily labor market-related data that would provide the first tests of this potential risk asymmetry. Special attention was focused on Friday’s highly consequential Jobs Report, the last big labor market indicator before the Federal Reserve's September 18th interest rate-setting meeting. Everyone understood that the outcome of this report was capable of influencing the size and pace of the rate cuts.
An alarming 9.5% daily plunge in the price of Nvidia stock (the company ended up losing over $400 billion in value in just four days last week) and then late breaking news that the firm is the subject of an escalating anti-trust investigation from the Department of Justice resulted in poor old CEO Jensen Huang being booted out of the $100 billion net worth club. We also saw some rather bleak Chinese economic data which added to the gloomy tone. All the price gains from the month-end rally in the indexes quickly dissolved.
The decline then began to feed on itself and sharply intensified as the high volume session wore on. Stocks ended the day substantially lower with the misery being most heavily inflicted on the tech/AI stock universe. Evidence is growing that investors may be steadily starting to take advantage of any strength in these kind of names to take highly-appreciated chips off the table and then later reinvest the proceeds into more defensive areas of the market including Financials, Consumer Defensive, Utilities, Healthcare and Industrials.
Global stocks took their cue and the rout continued into the Asian and European timezones including a 5% tumble in Japan. By the time Wednesday’s New York session began, however, there was a calmer vibe and Nvidia’s free-fall had at least temporarily come to a halt.
The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) showed that U.S. job openings fell in July by more than expected to the lowest level since the beginning of 2021 and layoffs rose, consistent with the multiple other signs of slowing demand for workers. The major indexes mercifully closed the day just a touch lower, but still with a sense of unease ahead of Friday’s Jobs Report.
After starting out with some rather hopeful price action, Thursday quickly deteriorated into another choppy down-day for stocks. Wall Street was seemingly very unimpressed with the economic babble that it was hearing from both of the presidential candidates (including Trump’s promise/threat to get Elon Musk involved in the governance of an actual country). If there was a silver lining it was that at least the bruised and battered tech/AI names managed to outperform the rest of the market.
Friday morning at long last arrived and the pre-market Jobs Report was finally unveiled. It was frankly a noisy mess that resolved nothing. 142k new jobs were added in August which was only slightly less than expected, but the July number was revised sharply downward. Unemployment, however, ticked down from 4.3% to 4.2% which was a bit of a pleasant surprise. Overall the report seemed to reinforce the idea of a labor market that is weakening but not yet weak.
Wall Street initially seemed frozen in place when markets opened, not really knowing how to react to the mixed numbers, but eventually the risk asymmetry kicked in and stock prices dived hard for a fourth straight day of losses to close out a very sour week. Tech/AI names were especially brutalized, resuming their role of biggest losers.
Futures markets ended the week indicating that there’s now a 70/30 chance of a “standard” 0.25% interest rate cut over a “jumbo” 0.50% cut at the Fed meeting later this month (just so you know, I’m very much with the majority on Team 0.25%).
A 0.50% cut could serve to possibly juice some growth assets at first, but it would also send out a signal about the Fed's nervousness about the economy and possibly create a sense that they may have lost control of the situation and were scrambling just to keep up with events. Not a good look.
In my opinion, a jumbo half point cut would be like the pilot hitting the oxygen mask deployment button on an airplane. Helpful? Absolutely. In the interests of all the passengers? Undoubtedly. But the message is still; “Brace yourselves everyone, something has gone wrong. Things are going to get rough and you can forget a soft landing.” Pun intended.
The most likely response would be some kind of mass panic on the plane. I think we can all figure out where this analogy takes us in terms of what might happen to stock prices.
OTHER NEWS ..
Steeling For Some Big Moves .. Normally stodgy US Steel (X) traded like a meme stock last week as the Washington Post reported on Tuesday that Biden is said to be preparing to block Nippon Steel’s $14.1 billion takeover of the troubled Pittsburgh-based company. The proposed deal, which is opposed by the United Steelworkers union, has been subject to a review by the government’s secretive Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States and Biden plans to kill it as soon as the committee’s referral lands on his desk, according to these reports. The deal has sparked an election-year firestorm in the crucial swing state of Pennsylvania. Shares of US Steel plunged as much as 24% after news of Biden’s plan broke.
Just Don’t Use These Things! .. Losses from Bitcoin ATM scams soared above $110 million in 2023, a nearly tenfold increase in just three years, new data from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) shows. And the scams are only increasing in pace. In the first six months of 2024, the FTC disclosed that losses to Bitcoin ATM scams exceeded $65 million. Older adults, especially those over 60, were found to be more than three times as likely to fall victim to these scams compared with younger people. Across all age groups, the median loss during this period was a whopping $10k.
These specialized Bitcoin ATMs, often located in high-traffic areas like convenience stores and gas stations, accept cash in exchange for crypto-currency, making them an appealing tool for scammers who often impersonate government officials, businesses, state and local agencies or tech support agents, and create a fake yet seemingly urgent need for the victims to withdraw money from their bank accounts and deposit the funds at a Bitcoin ATM to "protect" their savings.
Made Up Money .. A remote province in Argentina has created its own currency to offset the so-called “shock therapy” being imposed on the nation by Elon Musk’s new BFF, President Javier Milei. When monthly cash subsidies from the central government were slashed, the province of La Rioja literally went broke. In February, it fell into default and then quickly into a deep recession.
So the governor came up with a radical plan. He created the province’s own money, which he called the Chacho, equal to one official Argentinian peso. He had sheets of it printed up and started doling it out in wads of 50k each (equal to about $40 in a place where the average monthly salary is equal to about $240) to all government employees as a bonus payment that was accepted locally to buy subsistence items that many could no longer afford.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
How to recognize different types of moves in the stock market. A timely guide to boring days, selloffs and total crashes (and the strange case of Wall Street’s obsession with 1%)
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
U.S. inflation data for August is this week's highlight and the last major economic release before the Federal Reserve's September 18th meeting. Earnings will come out from Adobe, Oracle, Kroger and - like a bad smell that won’t go away - GameStop.
On Wednesday, we get the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for August. Expectations are for an annualized rate of 2.6% vs. the Fed’s target of 2.0%. The next day, we will see the latest Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers.
The European Central Bank is widely expected to lower its interest rate target on Thursday, for the second time this year.
Other potential market-moving events scheduled for this week are Apple’s major product event on Monday and the first presidential debate between Harris and Trump on Tuesday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower) - up 1.5% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Nvidia, Microsoft) - down 6.4% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 3.5% last week, is up 13.7% so far this year and ended the week 4.3% below its all-time record closing high (07/16/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 5.4% last week, is up 3.6% so far this year and ended the week 14.3% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.35%, one month ago: 6.47%, one year ago: 7.12%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 100% probability (100% a week ago)
No .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.375% (implying four rate cuts), one month ago: 4.375% (implying four rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 82%, one month ago: 49%, one year ago: 34%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 78%, one month ago: 64%, one year ago: 51%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 45% (51% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 30% (22% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 25% (27% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 20 (Bullish by 24 week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Last week was all about Wednesday’s after-hours Nvidia (NVDA) earnings report. Since the stock accounts for more than 6% of the S&P 500's total market capitalization in terms of its index weight and its unique position as a proxy for the entire market-impacting narrative of AI, it has the capability to be a meaningful influence on the direction, trend and momentum of the entire stock market.
Which also means that even highly diversified index fund holdings in the form of mutual funds and ETFs in the 401(k)s, IRAs and brokerage accounts of regular people are going to be affected somewhat by the market reaction to the fortunes of just a single company. In advance of the data release, options markets were predicting a +/-10% move in the stock price either way after the opening bell on Thursday. So pretty much everyone had a reason to care.
Worrying developments in the Middle East over the weekend drove oil prices back up above $80 on Monday and bolstered the values of supposed “safe haven” assets. Stocks got off to a lethargic start with most of Wall Street’s attention squarely focused on the sizable risk event that was Wednesday evening’s long-awaited Nvidia earnings report and to a lesser extent, Thursday’s weekly jobless claims data and GDP estimate. But as the session wore on, markets became more apprehensive about a potential disappointment and tech and AI names (including Nvidia itself) got punished while the rest of the market barely stirred.
Monday’s losers stabilized on Tuesday but it was another light trading volume snoozer overall with everything very much on hold ahead of the Nvidia numbers and stock prices hardly shifted at all, despite a better-than-expected Consumer Confidence Index and some mixed housing data.
Markets churned lower again on Wednesday with investor jitters resuming about the effect of a possible Nvidia “letdown” (that is, anything less than total perfection) that evening versus the colossal market expectation level, resulting in tech and AI stocks getting particularly dumped on. Things weren’t helped by a brutal 26% intra-day plunge in the stock price of one of 2024’s unqualified winners, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) - see OTHER NEWS below.
When the report finally dropped after the closing bell, we learned that Nvidia delivered really strong Q2 revenue and earnings growth and a very robust financial outlook. Revenue for the quarter was an astonishing $32.5 billion which actually exceeded the average of all analyst estimates but didn’t match some of the more outlandish expectations of above $37 billion.
In the crazy, upside-down Alice In Wonderland world of Nvidia earnings, failing to beat even the most ridiculously optimistic forecasts was frowned upon by traders and the stock price tumbled in the after-market.
Wall Street’s attention finally began to zoom back out to a more macro perspective pre-market on Thursday morning when the weekly Jobless Claims number came in as expected at +231k and the latest Q2 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data surprised to the upside with a raised growth estimate of +3.0% demonstrating that the economy is in great shape. Consumer Spending data came in better than expected, too. This all suggested a continued and orderly linear path towards the holy grail of a soft landing.
Stocks regained their footing when markets opened and the indexes initially rallied hard in spite of the price of Nvidia sliding over 6% and a continuation of the Super Micro Computer debacle. But the rally abruptly ran out of steam after lunch as it became clear that the dip-buyers weren’t yet ready to come to the rescue by piling straight back in to Nvidia at lower prices and the session’s gains swiftly evaporated.
It was yet another day of two very different narratives in the world of retail. Best Buy (BBY) surged 15% in a matter of minutes after a first-rate earnings report while Dollar General (DG) got crushed by a whopping 32% after a ghastly one as low income Americans appear to have simply stopped spending. The indexes ended the day unchanged.
The Fed got to see its preferred measure of inflation, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, before the opening bell on Friday. Entirely as expected, it rose +0.2% in July and +2.5% from a year ago, clearing the final hurdle for the now locked-in September interest rate cut.
Despite the long weekend ahead, trading volume was vigorous but for most of the day stocks drifted around aimlessly in a narrow range. A late surge, however, pulled prices higher with tech names outperforming. With more than 86% of the stocks in the S&P 500 rising on the day and all eleven sectors posting gains, the index ended the week just a hair’s breadth below its all-time record high.
Since the carnage of August 5th, surveys have shown an explosion of positive stock market sentiment amongst investors (while, notably, surveyed financial advisors remain a bit more reserved about the outlook). This matters because extremely bullish sentiment is evidence of complacent markets and complacent markets are vulnerable to “air pockets” like we saw at the beginning of the month.
This is particularly important because September (historically a highly volatile month) is shaping up to be very important. Not only will we get the Fed decision to cut interest rates by either 0.25% or 0.50% on September 18th (for what it’s worth, my money is still very much on 0.25%), but we will also get some color on how quickly and by how much rates will fall after that. Additionally, we’ll learn at the end of this week just how much the labor market is slowing.
Because investors are so “bulled up” right now, the markets are legitimately vulnerable to a negative surprise from either event that could possibly cause a repeat of early August (or worse) as a lot of the Johnny-come-lately buyers turn around and stampede for the exits.
OTHER NEWS ..
Hindenburg Crash .. Server and data center tech maker Super Micro Computer (SMCI) shares lost over a quarter of its value in the space of a few minutes after it announced on Wednesday it would be delaying the filing of its routine mandatory annual Form 10K disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), following the famous activist investigative research firm Hindenburg Research disclosing a short position in the stock, citing widespread accounting manipulation, family self-dealing and sanctions evasion.
"Additional time is needed for SMCI’s management to complete its assessment of the design and operating effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting as of June 30, 2024." the company mumbled.
The stock, which rose over 300% between January and March this year on the back of the AI craze, recovered slightly but still ended the week 19% lower than where it was before the report came out and down more than 63% from its high.
Shopping Around .. Americans are seeking to change their insurance coverage more frequently than ever, after a surge in premiums that’s squeezed household budgets, a new industry report shows.
For car insurance, the share of people with existing insurance who searched for quotes from a different provider jumped by 16% from a year earlier in Q2 2024. The figure climbed even higher in July, exceeding 30%.
The search for money-saving alternatives reflects a massive and sudden run-up in insurance premiums in recent years, driven partly by the rising cost of car parts and repairs and some changes in insurance company policies, partly impacted by an strong increase in climate-related claims.
It’s not entirely evident that consumers are proving successful in their quest for lower premiums. While the overall cost of living has climbed some 20% since the start of the pandemic in 2020, auto insurance bills have jumped by almost 50%.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
You’re not a billionaire. So stop trying to invest like one.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The start of a new month and a holiday-shortened week is headlined by a key Jobs Report. Stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday in observance of Labor Day.
There’ll be a smattering of earnings reports, including from Hewlett Packard, Broadcom, Dick's Sporting Goods, Dollar Tree and DocuSign but all eyes will be on Friday’s Jobs Report for August. Forecasts are for a gain of 155k in payrolls after a 114k increase in July. The unemployment rate is expected to edge down to 4.2% from 4.3%.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Financials (two biggest holdings: Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase) - up 2.9% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Nvidia, Microsoft)- down 1.7% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 0.2% last week, is up 18.6% so far this year and ended the week 0.2% below its all-time record closing high (07/16/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 0.2% last week, is up 9.7% so far this year and ended the week 9.3% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.46%, one month ago: 6.73%, one year ago: 7.18%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 100% probability (100% a week ago)
No .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.375% (implying four rate cuts), one month ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 79%, one month ago: 70%, one year ago: 46%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 77%, one month ago: 77%, one year ago: 55%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 51% (51% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 22% (25% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 27% (24% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 24 (Bullish by 27 week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Things got off to a somewhat muted low-volume start on Monday with many A-list institutional traders at the beach this week. Their B squads seemed to be under orders to basically tread water, waiting to see if anything of interest emerged from either the annual Federal Reserve jamboree in Jackson Hole or the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
As the session wore on, however, the level of investor conviction and general chatter about a possible upcoming signal from the Fed on Friday concerning the start of a multiple interest rate cut process before year-end seemed to intensify and stock prices ripped higher for the S&P 500’s eighth straight day of gains, its longest winning streak of the year. Remarkably, the index closed the day less than 1% away from its all-time record high.
And the NASDAQ, with an eight-day win streak of its own, shifted back into a bull market just eleven trading days after having fallen into a correction, the fastest such turnaround since 2011. It entered a technical correction (defined as having fallen >10% from its recent high) on August 2nd, then kept tumbling until August 7th (including the washout plunge of August 5th). Then from August 8th through the 19th the index rose more than 10%, ending the correction.
Stocks took a breather on a quiet Tuesday, with the indexes finally flashing red rather than green to end the winning streaks, but the technical evidence suggested that this was probably only a pause and consolidation in the rally caused by low volume profit-taking in possibly overheated short term conditions rather than any kind of fundamental negative re-evaluation of where stock prices should be.
On Wednesday, the annual Jobs Report fact check (see OTHER NEWS below for more details) showed a largely expected downward revision of payrolls, reminding us that growth is definitely slowing. We also saw a tale of two retailers; Target’s earnings and sales report was very solid, but Macy’s not so much and their respective stock price moves reflected that.
At an index level, the rally resumed (particularly in Small Cap names) after the minutes from the last Fed meeting indicated that there was a high level of confidence among members about a September interest rate cut.
The Fed’s two-day Jackson Hole fiesta began on Thursday but Wall Street didn’t expect to learn too much until Friday when Chairman Jerome Powell was scheduled to address the media. With no real catalyst before then and anemic summer trading volume, stocks and other risk assets floated lower on the back of profit-taking and bets on the fact that we may be experiencing something of a short term overbought condition on the back of the recent rocket ride that began on August 7th, especially in tech and AI names.
Powell’s address began at 10am ET on Friday and as well as being a victory lap,it gave Wall Street the signal that it was looking for.“The time has come for policy to adjust. The direction of travel is clear”, he said and expressed confidence in the continuation of inflation’s decline and the Fed’s ability to pull off a historic soft landing, signaling definitively that the process of interest rate cuts is now finally under way.
The word “methodical” was routinely used in reference to the process and reading between the lines of what Powell said and listening to Fed speakers in interviews after the event, a jumbo cut of half a percent up front in September would now seem much less likely than a steady stream of quarter point cuts in the Fed Funds rate over the upcoming Fed meetings in September, November, December, January, March and maybe even beyond.
Stock markets loved it and prices zoomed higher, once again disproportionately led by tech and Small Cap names. The S&P 500 wasn’t quite at a new all-time high by the end of the session, but it was pretty damn close.
Since August 7th, we have seen several examples of U.S. economic data that has been better than feared, but those fears were mostly irrational and they are obscuring the fact that the U.S. economy is slowing. We still don’t yet really know the answer to the question; is the Fed merely normalizing interest rates into a soft landing or is it cutting to rescue the economy from a recession?
For a couple of trading days in early August investors piled into bonds and dumped stocks after a disappointing Jobs Report and “recession” became a trendy buzz word. But that was ridiculous and mostly the result of hysteria from a few attention-seeking commentators, political operatives and a financial media desperate for viewers and clicks. None of the economic data was then or is now pointing towards a recession. To think that one is imminent simply isn’t backed by any facts, but that doesn’t mean that one can’t happen. It absolutely could.
On the flip side, the removal of an imagined possibility doesn’t actually mean the situation has got any better, so buying everything in sight because a non-existent risk seems to have suddenly disappeared is just as irrational!
The truth that the data shows is that U.S. economic growth is slowing and the only question is by how much. The stock market is pricing in a perfectly executed soft landing by the Fed, whereby they cut interest rates aggressively enough to relieve stress on consumers and corporations and boosting profits for U.S. companies without tossing the country into a dumpster fire of a recession. It is generally underestimating how bad the effects of a soft landing failure will be, even though such a failure is still not anywhere near a base case scenario, as things stand.
P.S. .. While there will be mostly smiles all over Wall Street when the Fed rate cuts arrive, retail investors do need to prepare for something less welcome. Those delightful 5% high yield savings accounts will likely start to cut their ratesroughly step-for-step in line with what the Fed does in the coming months. Many savers have got very used to these kind of returns on their cash for taking zero risk and will have to get used to a somewhat lower stream of free money going forward. Even then however, it’s still going to be way more than any bank or credit union pays you in their regular savings account.
OTHER NEWS ..
Rich Yet? .. Americans on average believe it takes a net worth of $2.5 million to be considered “wealthy” in 2024, according to annual survey results released by Charles Schwab last Wednesday. That’s a 14% jump from last year, when Americans thought it took $2.2 million to be considered rich.
The older someone is, the higher their definition of wealth in the survey. Baby boomers said being wealthy takes $2.8 million, while millennials put it at $2.2 million. Overall, slightly more than 20% of Americans said they were “on track” to be wealthy.
When asked what average net worth you’d need to be considered “financially comfortable,” Americans said $778k. This was a big drop from last year’s results when hot inflation drove the number to $1 million, the highest reading since the survey’s 2017 start.
Finally A Million ..For the first time ever, one bar of gold is worth $1 million. The milestone was when the precious metal’s spot price surpassed $2,500 per troy ounce, an all-time high. With a typical gold bar weighing about 400 troy ounces—well, you can do the math.
Disappearing Jobs? .. With victory over inflation almost in the bag, there’s a greater focus on the other half of the Federal Reserve’s mandate; the labor market. The Fed has always claimed to be data dependent in its interest rate decisions, buy how dependable is that data?
We got a peek last Wednesday when we got the annual fact check review from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) of all the notoriously inexact monthly Jobs Reports from April 2023 to March 2024. Jobs Reports have often featured at the center of the interest rate debate, none more so than the most recent release which triggered a short-lived but intense stock market crash earlier this month.
The annualized data showed a downward revision of 818k in payrolls, or about 68k per month, over the studied period. Although this was a large revision by historical standards, the largest since the Great Financial Crisis and delivered something of a blow to the BLS’ data-gathering credibility, it was pretty much in line with most analyst expectations and had no meaningful effect on markets.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Just in case there are still a few stragglers left who think that stock-picking works and is a good idea .. Remember the “can’t miss” darling stocks of the pandemic? Well, it turns out a lot of them did. Miss, I mean. Big-time.
This is how you can even be completely correct in your analysis and forecasts for a company’s fortunes and still lose a st-ton of money betting on it as an individual stock.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Highly anticipated Nvidia earnings, the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation gauge and the latest housing market data will likely provide next week's headlines.
The monster event on the earnings calendar will be Nvidia on Wednesday evening. As the poster child for the AI trade, the numbers will likely move markets significantly one way or the other. Other companies reporting next week include Dell, Salesforce, CrowdStrike, Chewy and lululemon.
On Friday, Fed officials will get a look at the July Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index. Consensus estimate is for the index to be up 2.6% annualized. This is the measure that the Fed, which has a 2.0% target inflation rate, uses to gauge where it believes inflation actually is.
Other data to watch next include the Durable Goods report and fresh housing data in the form of Home Price Indexes and the Pending Home Sales Index.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower Corp) - up 3.8% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron)- down 0.1% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.4% last week, is up 18.3% so far this year and ended the week 0.5% below its all-time record closing high (07/16/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 3.9% last week, is up 9.8% so far this year and ended the week 9.1% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.49%, one month ago: 6.78%, one year ago: 7.23%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 100% probability (100% a week ago)
No .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.375% (implying four rate cuts), one month ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 68%, one month ago: 67%, one year ago: 36%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 72%, one month ago: 71%, one year ago: 50%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 51% (42% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 25% (29% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 24% (29% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 27 (Bullish by 13 week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It’s less than two weeks since financial markets seemed to be teetering on a precipice. Japan had raised interest rates, a complex currency trade had broken down and a disheartening Jobs Report had come out in the U.S., sparking a chain reaction that triggered record-setting volatility levels and the worst stock market crash in decades in Asia which then cascaded around the world, cratering markets in Europe and the U.S., which suffered its worst one-day plunge since early in the COVID panic of 2020.
Many big-name analysts and economists were wetting their pants (yeah, I’m looking at you, Jeremy Siegel), hysterically squealing in the media for the Fed to make an unscheduled emergency interest rate cut to save the country from the horrors of the recession that was about to engulf us all. But markets began to gradually crawl back upward soon afterwards, mostly on the back of a lot of investor bargain-hunting and a growing sense that there had maybe been an over-reaction.
As last week wore on and we saw much more upbeat economic data, that crawl quickly became a high-speed dash, resulting in the best week of the year so far for stocks. The major indexes have now completely round-tripped, closing on Friday higher than they were when all this s**t started.
Stocks wobbled between slight gains and losses on a tepid-volume summer Monday, ultimately going nowhere ahead of some important and high-stakes updates later in the week on inflation, retail sales and earnings from major retailers. Half an eye was also being kept on geopolitics, with Ukrainian troops swarming into Russian territory and ceasefire hopes in jeopardy on the back of a soaring body count in Gaza at the same time as a potential escalation in Iran/Israel tensions and American warships edging closer to the region.
Before the opening bell on Tuesday, we got a very Fed-friendly release of the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers in July, underscoring the continued moderation in price pressures in the economy with the annualized rate falling to just +2.2%.
Wall Street took this as a hopeful sign for the next day’s CPI inflation number. There was a sea of green on the screen with stocks rocketing higher across the board as traders reloaded their bets on an extension of the rally after the previous week’s mauling. Tech names enjoyed a particularly buoyant session.
The inflation genie appears to be finally back in the bottle and an interest rate cut next month was as good as sealed on Wednesday morning pre-market when the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation came out in line with expectations, falling to a +2.9% annualized rate, a fourth consecutive monthly decline and down from a peak of over 9% in June 2022 and below the 3% level for the first time since March 2021. This kept the possibility of a “jumbo” interest rate cut of 0.50% on the table, although a reduction of 0.25% on September 18th remains the base case.
Investor reaction to CPI was a little muted with most of the enthusiasm having already been priced in by Tuesday’s monster rally but the indexes still managed to eke out some small gains by the close in what was another light-volume session.
It was a busy pre-market morning on Thursday with lower-than-expected weekly initial jobless claims, a spectacularly impressive Walmart earnings report with very cheerful forward guidance and a gigantic acceleration in Retail Sales which rose +1.0% in July after a -0.2% decline the prior month for its biggest climb since early 2023 even in the face of high prices and borrowing costs. This pointed to a resilient American consumer and a still-solid economy that's two-thirds measured by consumer spending.
In this renewed “good news is finally good news again” environment, stocks were turbo-charged higher at the open and stayed elevated throughout the session, with tech stocks and Small Caps distinctly outperforming. The major indexes completed a full recovery of all of the losses suffered during the shaky period that began with that big drop on August 1st.
Some of the air was let out of the balloon on Friday morning by some disappointing U.S. housing data which showed that new home construction fell in July to its lowest level since May 2020 along with a decline in building permits as homebuilders responded to weak demand. We also got to see the monthly Consumer Sentiment index which showed Americans are feeling a little better than expected about the economy and the prospects for inflation. Stocks shifted moderately higher and once again held onto those gains - bringing a very cheerful week to a close.
The odds of a soft landing are still considerably greater than those of a hard landing, but there’s no doubt that the gap between the two probability sets is closing. Stocks have proved to be impressively resilient as we saw last week, but the economic risks facing this market are non-trivial and potentially consequential should they come to pass (like, end-of-the-bull market consequential).
Think of your team having a 4-0 lead at half-time in a soccer game, but then early in the second half the opponent scores two quick goals. It’s still far more likely than not that your team will go on to win the game, it’s just less likely than it was at half-time.
OTHER NEWS ..
Unruly .. Only Turkey and Russia are at more risk than the U.S. among the world’s largest economies of political civil unrest and deadly violence (an extreme version of which was depicted in the intense recent movie Civil War) in the next year, according to a Bloomberg Economics analysis in conjunction with the U.S. government’s Political Instability Task Force.
While the probability of such violent internal conflict in this country is low, put at just 2.9%, it is more than double that of nations such as Canada, Germany and Australia that are often considered to be America’s democratic peers.
The analysis seeks to apply a quantitative lens to trends that have provoked fears of such unrest in the years since the January 6th 2021 insurrection and deadly attack on the Capitol building.
You Can Bet Your Future On It .. As sports gambling takes off in the U.S., turning quickly into a multi-billion dollar business, a worrisome trend is starting to emerge: Americans appear to be yanking money out of their investment accounts to fund their online betting habit.
This is the key finding laid out in a recent working paper titled Gambling Away Stability: Sports Betting’s Impact on Vulnerable Households. It claims to find evidence that for every $1 spent on sports gambling – now legalized in most states since 2018 — net investments in stocks and other financial instruments dropped by just over $2.
The phenomenon is most noticeable among the most financially-strained households, potentially the same ones attracted to nonsense and dangerous get-rich-quick schemes in financial markets like meme stocks and speculative options including crypto scams, frequently promoted on social media.
What Happened When The COVID $$$ Went Away? .. Consumers fell behind on debt payments as pandemic-era wealth disappeared, leaving some households in dire financial shape as the economy slows. That's the takeaway from a new study by economists at the San Francisco Federal Reserve that shows how wealth built up during the pandemic helped support consumer spending in the face of high interest rates and inflation.
Now that "extra" wealth is gone, the opposite is the case: Spending is cooling, and many consumers have a much smaller cushion to fall back on if the economy were to enter a recession. At the peak in 2021, the top 20% of households by income accumulated $1 trillion more in liquid wealth than would have been the case absent the pandemic. The bottom 80% built up an additional $270 billion in liquid holdings.
Economists estimate that the 80% saw this extra wealth fully drained by late 2021. But it didn't dry up for the 20% until over a year later. The fact that it lasted longer was likely helped by the fact that, instead of having to spend it, they plowed the money into interest-bearing assets at the same time as rates were moving higher.
As of the beginning of 2024, liquid wealth for the rich was 2% lower than its pre-pandemic path would have indicated. The bottom 80% have roughly 13% less. As these funds depleted and then disappeared, household debt rose, as did instances of missed credit card payments. Smaller financial cushions and heightened credit stress for households in the bottom 80% all pose a risk to future consumers’ ability to withstand a recession if/when one ever arrives, potentially damaging sales and earnings of major corporations.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Time to debunk some myths about couples, marriage and credit scores.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The Federal Reserve's annual Jackson Hole conference will be this week's highlight, including a highly anticipated speech by Jerome Powell on Friday morning. The Fed chair is widely expected to lay the groundwork for a interest-rate cut to be announced after its next meeting on September 18th. On Wednesday, the central bank will also release the minutes from its July meeting.
There are a few more earnings reports this week including those from Target, Lowe’s, Intuit, Dollar Tree, Palo Alto Networks, TJX and Estee Lauder.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Nvidia) - up 7.6% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower Corp) - up 0.2% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 3.9% last week, is up 16.6% so far this year and ended the week 1.9% below its all-time record closing high (07/16/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 2.9% last week, is up 5.9% so far this year and ended the week 12.4% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.47%, one month ago: 6.81%, one year ago: 7.09%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 100% probability (100% a week ago)
No .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.375% (implying four rate cuts), one month ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 58%, one month ago: 76%, one year ago: 40%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 66%, one month ago: 78%, one year ago: 53%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 42% (41% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 29% (22% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 29% (37% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 13 (Bullish by 4 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It’s not often you get the kind of violent, concentrated two-way turbulence that we experienced last week. In the course of three days, the S&P 500 had both its worst day since 2020 and its best day since 2022 and still ended the week unchanged.
The ferocious global market rout from the end of the prior week intensified on Monday as more storm clouds rapidly gathered over financial markets around the world. All hell broke loose in Asia where Japanese stocks got smashed by over 12%, suffering their worst day since Black Monday in 1987 and European markets rolled over.
It was likewise a bloodbath for risk assets over here once the U.S. came online, with the Big Tech/AI darlings and crypto in particular in the eye of the storm and getting ruined as large institutional market participants with huge, leveraged positions in these type of assets were forced by market conditions to unwind them all in short order, creating a vicious feedback loop.
After what was the worst trading session for U.S. stocks since the early COVID panic of March 2020, indexes closed off their lows of the day, but with no immediate signs of any kind of circuit breaker as we are currently in the midst of a “mini dead zone” for economic data releases.
The bloodied baton was passed back to Asia and a chunk of Monday’s wreckage was immediately repaired, with Japanese stocks jumping over 10% (their best day since 2008). Europe didn’t exactly rebound, but at least managed to stop the worst of the bleeding.
Some semblance of order and calm returned to U.S. stock markets after the opening bell on Tuesday as investors began to cautiously sniff around for bargains after the massive selloff. The storm clouds retreated further as the sense slowly grew that (shocker!) markets may have possibly over-reacted to an admittedly underwhelming but hardly godawful Jobs Report the Friday before and the indexes finished the session nicely higher, clawing back around a third of Monday’s losses.
The Asian and European recovery continued on Wednesday and initially followed through into the U.S. as the Fed continued to wheel out officials to vigorously push back against the narrative that the central bank has been caught offside and is losing control of the economy.
However, stocks failed to hold on to the impressive early gains as a broad-based wave of selling resumed after lunch and the indexes finished lower on the day, underscoring the market’s continued fragility.
Asia and Europe slid a touch lower on Thursday but U.S. markets benefited from lower-than-expected weekly jobless claims and the continued sense that Monday’s carnage was maybe just a fever dream and that the reality police had perhaps arrived. Stocks raced higher from the start, led by rapidly recovering tech names. The rally gathered pace as the session wore on, helped by more decent earnings reports including from the Magnificent Seven wannabe, Eli Lilly. The S&P 500 ended up having its best day since November 2022.
A schizophrenic week came to a close on Friday after mostly positive Asian and European sessions fed into the U.S. markets which paused for breath and drifted a tad higher in a rather exhausted, super-light volume session ahead of an economic data-heavy week (see THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR below). Astonishingly given the extent of Monday’s massacre, the S&P 500 finished Friday exactly where it had been a week before.
It’s really, really important to note that these sharp, brutal declines we’ve seen in the last couple of weeks are far more a result of the investor complacency about a sudden economic shock and resulting highly-leveraged over-optimistic positioning that I have been banging on about for months now and NOT (yet) about a significant deterioration in economic data.
Many big tech stocks and particularly in AI and crypto world have rocketed upwards in the last year mostly on a vibe and a sugar high rather than on any kind of commercial reality.
Now financial markets have finally been forced to admit what was frankly obvious to anyone who had been paying attention; that the fully priced-in absolute perfection of never-ending economic growth, continually explosive earnings, guaranteed AI riches for all and relatively tranquil geopolitics does not exactly correspond to what we are experiencing right now.
That disconnect is starting to be corrected by these violent mini-crashes and subsequent rebuilds and that’s a good thing in the long term as it solidifies the foundation of future stock price rallies and increases the likelihood that they could be sustainable and long-lasting.
One last thing. To be clear, heavily falling markets are a feature of investing for your future, not a bug. They are going to happen frequently over your investing timeline. For those with longer time horizons (ten, fifteen or twenty years or multiple decades) these moves provide delicious opportunities to buy equities through ETFs at lowered prices and this weekly report is absolutely not intended to shake such investors out of their stock positions. Quite the opposite.
Stock markets have never, ever failed to subsequently rally back to new all-time highs following any steep declines. There’s no reason to think that’s ever going to change. Just keep buying for the longer term.
OTHER NEWS ..
Vacation Woes .. Airbnb Inc. shares plunged after the company issued yet another disappointing outlook and warned of slowing demand from U.S. vacationers. The company is “seeing shorter booking lead times globally and some signs of slowing demand from U.S. guests.”
At the same time, shares of Booking Holdings also got hit, with “moderation” in the European travel market and U.S. consumers opting for lower-star hotels and much shorter stays being blamed.
Moving Out .. The pandemic changed where Americans are likely to live and work, with a growing portion of job openings moving away from the biggest cities and into smaller metro areas, according to a Federal Reserve Bank of New York analysis.
Job listings in large central metro areas now account for about 38% of total listings nationwide, down from 46% pre-pandemic. The portion of job openings in smaller metros increased and the share of openings in “fringe” metros outside of large central cities held steady, the study showed. Increased remote work led to a decline in the share of jobs concentrated in major cities that require people to commute into an office. As people relocated to the smaller urban centers, it created more demand for food workers, health care and other services in those areas.
Pancake Money .. Wealthier Americans are visiting IHOP and Applebee’s more often and they’re looking for deals on their pancakes and wings. Dine Brands Global Inc., the two chains’ parent company, announced a drop in visits from lower-income customers in recent quarters but is attracting more guests from households that make $100k+ annually. All diners, regardless of how much they make, are gravitating to value offerings including unlimited riblets at Applebee’s and a special breakfast combo deal at IHOP.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK .. Bumper triple issue.
Steep declines like we have seen recently can generate a multitude of tempting reasons to sell your stocks. Here’s why every single one of them is wrong.
A trillion dollar time bomb is ticking in the housing market.
Insurance companies are quite literally trying to steal your retirement money.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
For those who nerd out on Federal Reserve policy, this week's highlight will be new inflation data. Q2 earnings season begins to wind down.
The latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation will be released on Wednesday morning. The consensus estimate is for +2.9% from a year ago. The day before, we will get to see the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers
On Thursday we will get the important latest Retail Sales data and the big Consumer Sentiment Survey comes out on Friday.
Earnings reports to watch will come from Walmart, Home Depot, Alibaba, Cisco, AMD, Deere and Barrick Gold.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Industrials (two biggest holdings: GE Aerospace, Caterpillar) - up 1.3% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Sherwin Williams) - down 1.6% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price was unchanged last week, is up 12.1% so far this year and ended the week 5.6% below its all-time record closing high (07/16/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 1.2% last week, is up 2.9% so far this year and ended the week 14.9% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.73%, one month ago: 6.89%, one year ago: 6.96%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 100% probability (100% a week ago)
No .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.125% (implying five rate cuts), one month ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 56%, one month ago: 44%, one year ago: 57%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 69%, one month ago: 63%, one year ago: 62%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 41% (45% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 22% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 37% (25% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 4 (Bullish by 20 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
There are three main factors that have propelled the S&P 500 higher in 2024 .. i) solid economic data, ii) impending Federal Reserve interest rate cuts, and iii) AI enthusiasm. Last week provided challenges for all three of those narratives. With key earnings reports, central bank interest rate decisions taking place in Washington DC, London and Tokyo and a pivotal Jobs Report, it always looked like it was going to be a highly volatile week. From that perspective at least, it didn’t disappoint.
Stocks cautiously meandered around with no real purpose on Monday and ended up essentially unchanged, with traders acutely aware that potentially impactful economic data and crucial earnings reports were all on the docket for the following few days, rendering this session something of a lame duck.
The real business of the week began on Tuesday with the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) which came in unchanged and as expected showing 8.2m open job positions in the U.S., further evidence of no imminent recession. Paypal, Jet Blue and Pfizer released impressive earnings. Procter & Gamble, Starbucks and Merck, not so much. These were only appetizers, however. The main course was Microsoft after the closing bell.
Dragged down again by tech and AI, stocks dipped partly due to pre-earnings positioning, but also as a result of the increasing geopolitical temperature in both the Middle East and Venezuela and the potential effect that could have on oil prices and thereby the global economy.
Microsoft’s Q2 sales and earnings were fine, but its mostly AI-related capital expenditure was off the charts, up by 55% from a year earlier with a perceived lack of resulting direct revenue in return. When markets opened on Wednesday, Microsoft notably failed to participate in what was otherwise a substantial rebound in the beaten-down tech sector in advance of the Fed declaration at 2pm ET.
Before attention turned fully to Fed’s interest rate announcement, the first of the week’s three big global central bank resolutions was made by the Bank of Japan, which raised the local interest rate by 0.25% to its highest level since 2008.
As was universally anticipated, there was no change in interest rates from the Fed with only very limited tweaks to its accompanying policy statement, giving Wall Street little to work with. Chairman Powell successfully navigated a rather feisty press conference, playfully dropping plenty of breadcrumbs about a September cut without actually confirming it (“A reduction in the policy rate could be on the table as soon as the next meeting in September.").
As so often happens, the Fed gave an inch and markets took a mile and stocks extended their considerable session gains, powered by Nvidia which shattered the all-time record for a one-day increase in any company’s value, adding $330 billion in just six and a half hours.
Oh and by the way, Meta/Facebook announced earnings after the closing bell and it was smiles all around as estimates were surpassed and the stock screamed higher when markets opened the next day. The Bank of England completed the global central bank divergence full house, narrowly voting on Thursday to cut interest rates in the UK for the first time since early 2020.
Unexpectedly cool manufacturing data and a hot weekly jobless claims number triggered a lunchtime collapse in stock prices. There was also a growing sense that investors might be exiting stocks (particularly the highly-valued ones) as a profit-taking exercise and rushing into increasingly attractive bonds as Treasury yields fall sharply in response to expected Fed policy. All of Wednesday’s gains were quickly wiped out.
The tech earnings parade concluded after the close with releases from Apple, Amazon and Intel. In descending order of good news:
Apple beat estimates on overall sales and profitability, but the company is clearly still having problems with iPhone sales in China and the fact that (shocker!) no-one seems to be buying any Vision Pro headsets at $3500 a pop.
Amazon showed decent sales growth in Q2 but missed on revenue and profitability and gave rather gloomy income projections for the rest of the year.
Intel’s report was a complete catastrophe. The company missed estimates on just about every imaginable metric, announced mass layoffs and spending cuts, admitted that it was late to the AI party, gave grim forward guidance and made the kryptonite decision to suspend its dividend (there’s nothing Wall Street hates more than this).
Asian markets crashed overnight in their worst session in years. Europe did little better. The pre-opening bell Jobs Report over here on Friday was all that stood between the U.S. markets and a similar fate. It utterly failed to do so. Payrolls rose 114k in July, way below the 175k estimate and the two previous months were also revised downwards. The unemployment rate rose from 4.1% to 4.3%, its highest level in nearly three years.
Treasury yields tumbled in breathtaking fashion, accelerating the stocks → bonds exodus referred to above. The sudden growth scare that I have been warning about for months may well have arrived. The Fed’s decision on Wednesday to delay cutting interest rates until mid-September was suddenly viewed as a grave policy mistake and there were loud shouts for a double rate cut in September, a full 0.50% rather than just 0.25%. There were even some calls for the Fed to make an unscheduled interim cut ahead of the meeting, something I must say is highly unlikely.
It was a brutal sea of red when the stock market opened, with much of Wall Street’s venom reserved for Intel which fell over 25% in the first two minutes of trading and Amazon which dropped 10%. There was absolutely nowhere to hide with Small Caps getting heavily whacked as well. All the major stock indexes, particularly the NASDAQ, closed the day and the week badly battered and bruised. For those keeping score, more than $2 trillion in value has been obliterated from the NASDAQ-100 index in the last three weeks alone.
With a September interest rate cut now assured (it’s just a question of how big it is), any bad economic news has now shifted in Wall Street’s eyes from being good news since it that could prompt a rate cut to just being straight-up bad news.
If you thought July was wild ride, strap in for August.
OTHER NEWS ..
Ignorant politicking .. At his press conference on Wednesday, Fed chairman Jerome Powell understandably bristled when he was faced with questions about the possibility that there could be a political element to any interest rate decision in advance of the November election. There is only one more rate policy announcement between now and then (September 18th), with the next one taking place two days after the event.
The frankly embarrassing ignorance and pathetic showboating instincts of politicians on both sides was on full display last week. Democrats moaning at the Fed: “if you don’t cut interest rates in advance of the election, it’s a political call!”. Republicans whining to the Fed: “if you do cut interest rates before the election, it’s a political call!”. This conversation is being exacerbated by increasing speculation, driven by Friday’s Jobs Report, that there could even be a double rate cut in September, 0.50% rather than just 0.25%.
The Fed’s job is to act in an informed and dispassionate manner and everyone else is welcome to react however they want. What would be an economically damaging move would be to NOT make any changes that are informed by the data regardless of any perceived political consequences one way or another. Aggrieved politicians just need to deal with it and STFU.
Americans Earn A Lot More Money Than They Think .. The Economic Innovation Group published an interesting report that compares U.S. workers with the rest of the world and showed that the lowest paid workers in the U.S., who live in Mississippi, still earn more than the average worker in Germany and Canada. Other low earnings states such as Oklahoma, West Virginia and South Carolina still have higher average incomes than Belgium, Denmark and Austria. Only workers in Luxembourg and Switzerland earn more than the lowest paid U.S. workers.
Of course, it’s also true that one reason for this disparity is that Americans work longer hours than people in other countries. However, it’s striking how people in so-called lower income states have meaningfully higher wages than those in some of the world’s biggest developed economies.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Don’t fall for this stock-picking nonsense.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week will be a break from meaningful economic data but Q2 earnings season continues relentlessly with results from around 80 S&P 500 companies including CVS, Eli Lilly, Disney, Novo Nordisk, Shopify, Monster Beverage, NRG Energy, Warner Bros, Super Micro Computer, Caterpillar, Occidental Petroleum, Uber, AirBnb, Paramount, BioNTech, CSX, Simon Properties, Devon Energy and Wynn Resorts.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) for the second week in a row - up 4.1% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Nvidia) - down 5.3% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 2.5% last week, is up 12.1% so far this year and ended the week 5.7% below its all-time record closing high (07/16/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 7.3% last week, is up 4.1% so far this year and ended the week 13.9% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.78%, one month ago: 6.95%, one year ago: 6.90%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 100% probability (100% a week ago)
No .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts), one month ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 70%, one month ago: 45%, one year ago: 77%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 75%, one month ago: 65%, one year ago: 66%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 45% (43% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 30% (25% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 25% (32% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 20 (Bullish by 11 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.54%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (3.62%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.16% to 0.17%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
Thanks for reading ANGLES, from Anglia Advisors! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
With Biden finally realizing last Sunday that he needed to walk the plank, the Democrats swiftly clearing the runway for Harris and the resulting shift in the election narrative, Wall Street’s prior assumption of a comfortable Trump victory in November was thrown into some doubt. It always had the potential to be a volatile week anyhow with a flood of Q2 earnings reports, including from some high profile names, as well as big GDP and inflation data releases and so it proved to be.
On Monday morning, the dip buyers at last returned from a one week vacation as the tech stocks that had been battered the week before were heavily bought up from their significantly lower prices (except for Crowdstrike obviously, which was savagely smashed lower again, about a quarter of the company’s entire value was erased in just two trading days). The generally positive euphoria intensified as the session wore on ahead of potentially consequential earnings reports and all of the indexes ended the day substantially higher.
There were some solid earnings before the opening bell on Tuesday from the likes of Spotify, GE, General Motors and Coca-Cola, although UPS (sometimes regarded as a bellweather proxy for the U.S. economy) badly disappointed and the stock price got butchered. The headline indexes meandered in and out of positive and negative territory all day, finishing a touch lower. The rotation trade that I talked about in last week’s report seemed to be back on as Small Cap stocks resumed their significant outperformance once again.
After the closing bell, Alphabet/Google’s results lacked a wow factor, with concerning levels of spending burn, although profitability slightly surpassed most estimates. Tesla, however, totally whiffed on earnings expectations yet again for the fourth straight quarter and also provided distinctly underwhelming forward guidance, despite Musk’s awkward and evasive attempt at smoke-and-mirrors on the analyst call. Both stocks ended up getting punished in after-hours trading and then again when real markets opened the next day.
A palpable change in tone emerged on Wednesday morning after Bill Dudley, former New York Fed president, publicly suggested that an interest rate cut should be made at this week’s Fed meeting rather than waiting until September. This sentiment was quickly echoed by a number of other analysts who suggested that, at the rapid rate that the economy appears to be cooling, a September rate cut might possibly be too late to save it from falling into recession.
Wall Street was spooked partly by this recession talk revival, but mostly by the Google and Tesla earnings and a growing concern that recent massive AI investment is actually not going to translate into materially higher productivity or revenue any time soon.
Stock indexes were pounded across the board from the moment that markets opened. The worst of the ugliness was saved for Mega Cap Tech and the NASDAQ in particular got slammed by waves of furious selling to experience its worst session since the dark days of October 2022. The carnage cascaded through Asian and European markets, pushing Japanese stocks into a technical correction (down >10% from the recent high). It also crashed other risk assets like crypto and commodities.
But then, before the New York opening bell on Thursday, we got the first estimate of Q2 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which showed that the U.S. economy is in tremendous shape with a surging +2.8% annualized growth rate, blowing through the +1.9% expectation and +1.4% rate in Q1. This derailed fears of an upcoming recession and appeared to give the Fed breathing space until September for its destined rate cut.
The earnings reports kept on coming, including a profitability and outlook horror-show from Ford whose stock price was mercilessly punished as a result, all of its 2024 gains were wiped out in a matter of minutes. The indexes initially stabilized on the back of the GDP print and then bounced around rather chaotically for the rest of the session, to finish little changed but with Mega Cap Tech and AI still feeling very fragile.
Stocks turned higher and finished what was a tough week with some nice gains on Friday, with the Large → Small rotation trade very much back in play as the latest inflation reading did nothing to alter bets that interest rate cuts are definitely coming in September (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below). Fed actions rely heavily on the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index which showed core inflation (ex-food and energy) rose +0.2% last month and +2.6% annualized, all just as expected and further evidence of a continued declining trajectory towards the Fed’s 2.0% target.
While many of the more dramatic analysts out there are explaining this current pullback as a warning on future economic growth or extrapolating some kind of political commentary by the markets, my view is that it is being caused by much less sexy (yet still important) factors: institutional trader positioning and earnings. The recent meaningful decline in stocks is being driven by the correction of an overextended tech sector (particularly AI-related) and some disappointing earnings from a few specific corporations.
There is no evidence that the defensive sectors of the market are starting to notably and consistently outperform the broader market and until that happens, any weakness in stocks should not be viewed as a lasting top being established - but instead as a relief of over-heated short-term conditions and profit-taking pullback by major market players.
Of course, the persistent recession fear-mongers and Chicken Littles will eventually be right one day simply by virtue of the broken clock theory. For them, fear springs eternal, you might say.
OTHER NEWS ..
Trump Is Fluttering His Eyelids At The Crypto Bros. Regulators Are Worried .. On Saturday, Trump’s sudden enthusiastic embrace of crypto (and its potential donor dollars) resulted in a rousing speech at some Bitcoin convention in Nashville which was heaving with whooping, fist-pumping crypto bros, where he boasted that, if elected, he would immediately fire the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chairman Gary Gensler and replace him with some pro-crypto individual who would push the agenda of the crypto industry in the U.S.
This, along with a weird Republican plan to force the U.S. government to buy and long-term hold billions of dollars-worth of Bitcoin for at least twenty years which could only ever be used to pay down national debt, is causing alarm among investor protection regulators and in the more sane corners of Wall Street. This follows Trump’s recent threat to put to an end the independence of the Federal Reserve and place interest rate decision-making partially under the individual control of the President.
Next Up, Ethereum .. The supposedly vehemently anti-crypto SEC approved the immediate listing of multiple spot Ethereum exchange traded funds (ETFs) on Monday, less than a year after approving a whole suite of Bitcoin ETFs. Investors can now safely and easily hold Ethereum in a regulated and secure ETF wrapper on a proper stock exchange in a normal brokerage account or IRA instead of inside some dodgy wallet or on one of the expensive and potentially unsafe crypto exchanges.
The ETFs based on the spot price of the second largest cryptocurrency with a $420 million market capitalization, started trading the next day.
Light At The End Of The Tunnel? ..The housing market again showed a slowdown in sales but a rise in prices in June. The median existing home sale price in the U.S is now $426,900, up 4.1% from last year and the second record high in a row.
Sales of existing homes dropped 5.4% from last month and the same amount from a year ago. However, in a sliver of hope for buyers, inventory in June rose to a 4.1-month supply, a 3.1% improvement over May and a sign that purchasers may finally gaining a bit more leverage in the market.
Champagne And Coffee .. Demand for champagne is softening this year after the boom that followed COVID lockdown. There had been a general sense of “revenge pleasure” in 2021 and 2022 after consumers were stuck at home by lockdowns and sales ballooned. That’s fading now, although there’s been no significant fall in demand for high-end champagne in nightclubs or top restaurants around the world. It’s home consumption that has apparently collapsed.
Any consumers who may have replaced champagne with coffee are now facing price rises in their new tipple of choice. Both the high-end arabica beans favored by coffee chains like Starbucks and the more budget-friendly robusta variety have spiked in price, thanks to bad weather and major supply disruptions from Vietnam to Brazil. Up and down the supply chain, sellers have been raising prices and scrapping discounts to protect their margins and many warn of more increases ahead.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Three investment myths you’ve probably heard - and why they are all wrong.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This is going to be another very busy week. More than 160 S&P 500 companies (including a good number of the big dogs) are scheduled to report Q2 results, the Federal Reserve will announce an interest-rate decision on Wednesday and, as if that wasn’t enough, we get JOLTS on Tuesday and the Jobs Report on Friday.
Earnings highlights will include Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Meta/Facebook, Exxon-Mobil, Pfizer, Moderna, Boeing, McDonalds, Mastercard, Intel, Chevron, AMD, Procter & Gamble, Merck, Starbucks, PayPal, Qualcomm, Biogen, American Tower, Conoco, Etsy, eBay and Marriot.
On Tuesday, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) will be released ahead of the main event, Friday’s Jobs Report. Consensus estimates call for a +177k gain in payrolls for July, after +206k in June.
The Federal Reserve's policy making committee is widely expected to keep interest rates unchanged on Wednesday. The focus will be on the post-meeting press conference from chairman Jerome Powell. Everyone will be listening for any confirmatory hints about the fully-anticipated September rate cut.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - up 1.7% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 2.8% for the week.
SECTOR DASHBOARD:
Sector Dashboard courtesy of The Sevens Report, data valid as of early last week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 0.9% last week, is up 14.5% so far this year and ended the week 3.6% below its all-time record closing high (07/16/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 3.6% last week, is up 11.7% so far this year and ended the week 7.6% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.77%, one month ago: 6.86%, one year ago: 6.81%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 5% probability (5% a week ago)
No .. 95% probability (95% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 100% probability (97% a week ago)
No .. 0% probability (3% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts), one month ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 64%, one month ago: 46%, one year ago: 86%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 73%, one month ago: 67%, one year ago: 74%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 43% (53% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 25% (24% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 32% (23% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 11 (Bullish by 30 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.09%, one month ago: 3.18%, one year ago: 3.91%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.06%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.24% to 0.16%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
Thanks for reading ANGLES, from Anglia Advisors! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Despite the politically consequential events in Pennsylvania the weekend before, the assassination attempt appeared not to have been that much of a game-changer on Wall Street since a Trump victory in November had been pretty much assumed already and was then simply priced in more strongly than ever over the course of the week. But there were plenty of other factors in play during what ended up being quite a wild few days.
Wall Street didn’t miss a beat and picked up on Monday right where it had left off the previous Friday; gains across the board on the back of interest rate cut optimism - but most notably in 2024’s forgotten Mid and Small Cap world, for the third consecutive day of a noticeable widening in the breadth of the rally as the market-driven predicted most likely number of 2024 interest rate cuts moved up from two to three.
Interestingly, traditional beneficiaries of Republican governance such as old school oil producers, regional banks and gun-related companies were among the leaders while likely Republican punching bags like Blackrock (BLK), UnitedHealth Group (UNH), green energy and emerging market stocks did far less well.
On Tuesday a surprisingly hot pre-market Retail Sales print, which showed an increase in June vs. the expectation of a decrease, was thrown into the mix as was the announcement of Trump’s running mate choice, J.D. Vance, who has in the past publicly called for the breakup of Google, vocally opposes American support for Ukraine against Russia and who bizarrely just claimed that the UK was the world’s first Islamist country with a nuclear weapon.
After a strong start in the same vein as the last few trading days, Large Cap stocks began to show some signs of exhaustion during the afternoon session with the tech sector again taking the day off, but Small Caps kept up their epic rally as what was already becoming dubbed the “Great Rotation”out of larger, tech-related names and into smaller, more consumer-related names continued in anticipation of the broadening of the rally as interest rate cuts finally begin in September (now considered pretty much a certainty - see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below).
But things took a sudden and very nasty turn on Wednesday. Tech in general and chip and AI-related stocks in particular were taken behind the woodshed on the back of the idea that the U.S. is floating the notion of tougher trade curbs with China and concerns surrounding a likely Trump/Vance approach to international trade, fueled also by a growing sense that the whole AI hype thing could just have got ahead of itself with some high profile stocks being simply overpriced as a result.
Stock indexes plunged - but the rotation trade still persisted as the smaller cap indexes fell much less hard than those with a high Mega Cap Tech allocation which took a real beating. The NASDAQ index suffered its worst daily nose-dive since late 2022 and, perhaps ominously, the usual dip-buyers were notable only by their absence.
On Wednesday evening, in his convention speech, Vance took on the populist attack-dog role right away and promptly took aim at financial markets, saying that a Republican administration “will not cater to Wall Street” and its “barons” who “crashed the economy”, presumably some kind of reference to 2008 and the Great Financial Crisis. He also pledged to “stop the Chinese Communist Party from building their middle class on the backs of American citizens.”
The European Central Bank kept interest rates unchanged on Thursday morning but warned of multiple risks to economic growth in the Eurozone. U.S. stocks appeared initially to have at least stopped Wednesday’s severe bleeding, but once it became clear that there was still no sign of the cavalry in the form of the extensive, rebound-producing “buying of the dip” that has accompanied all recent sharp declines, stock prices sank substantially further across the board resulting in a second consecutive rotten day, with even the Great Rotation trade losing steam.
America woke up to a global tech outage on Friday caused by a botched Crowdstrike update to Microsoft systems. Exchanges around the world were only lightly impacted and the broad stock sell-off swiftly resumed when U.S. markets opened and only intensified as the session went on, with Crowdstrike’s stock price (CRWD) especially punished. There was still no sign of the dip-buying cavalry as Mega Cap Tech stock prices struggled to find a floor.
In the five trading days following July 11th, the Russell 2000 Small Cap Value Index soared by 8% at the same time as the Large Cap tech stock index slumped by 5.5%. The 2024 performance gap between the NASDAQ and the Russell 2000 Small Cap index shrank from 20% to 10% over the same time period. It was the largest one-week Small Cap outperformance of Large Cap in history.
Traders appear to be taking a lot of chips (pun intended) off the table ahead of the beginning of Mega Cap Tech earnings this week, not to mention the release of big GDP and inflation data (see THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR below). It could take just one big earnings miss or one negative headline from a highly weighted company to take the major indexes down even further. Conversely, a spectacular rebound from these lower prices could also be on the cards if the earnings news is impressive and the dip buyers return en masse.
Let’s buckle up!
OTHER NEWS ..
Foreign Buyers Fleeing The U.S... It’s not just Americanswho can’t afford U.S. homes. International purchases hit a record low as foreign buyers balked at the dollar’s strength and a dearth of available US properties. Non-U.S. citizens bought 54,300 previously-owned homes in the country in the twelve months through March, a 36% decline from the same period a year before.
Purchases were constrained in part by the same inventory shortage that’s challenged domestic house hunters in recent years. Owners clinging to pandemic-era cheap mortgages are keeping thousands of potential listings off the market, and that’s driving up prices for properties that are available.
Soccer Chaos Ahead Of 2026 World Cup .. The Copa America soccer final between Argentina and Colombia in Miami last weekend was supposed to be a showcase dress rehearsal for North America’s upcoming hosting of what is by far the world’s biggest sporting event, the 2026 World Cup. Instead, it descended into embarrassing chaos with video footage showing mostly Colombian fans storming the gates before kickoff and ultimately being allowed in to the stadium by overwhelmed stewards. Many of these fans were ticketless and consequently some ticket-holders who had paid many thousands of dollars for tickets and travel failed to get into the game at all and ended up watching it on a big screen in the parking lot.
The tournament organizers were also criticized for failing to provide adequate security protection for the players’ families, some of whom appeared to come under attack from rival fans, leading to some players jumping into the stands and fighting with supporters.
Not a good look just two years out from the event.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
You can now use your workplace retirement plan as an ATM for emergencies of up to $1k a year.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Q2 earnings season will continue to be investors' main focus this week with about a quarter of the companies in the S&P 500 scheduled to release, including Alphabet/Google, Tesla, Verizon, UPS, AT&T, Honeywell, SAP, NXP Semiconductors, Unilever, General Motors, Coca-Cola, Visa, Comcast, 3M, Lockheed Martin, NextEra Energy, American Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Newmont, Chubb, Las Vegas Sands and Chipotle.
On Thursday we will get the first estimate (of three) for Q2 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) The consensus estimate is for an annualized U.S. growth rate of 1.9%, versus a final number of 1.4% in Q1.
The Fed relies heavily on the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index for its inflation estimate and consequent interest rate policy and the latest data comes out on Friday. Expectations are for a 2.4% year-over-year inflation rate, down from 2.6% the previous month.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 2.1% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Nvidia) - down 5.4% for the week.
SECTOR DASHBOARD:
Sector Dashboard courtesy of The Sevens Report, data valid as of early last week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 2.0% last week, is up 15.5% so far this year and ended the week 2.8% below its all-time record closing high (07/16/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 1.7% last week, is up 8.0% so far this year and ended the week 10.6% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.89%, one month ago: 6.87%, one year ago: 6.82%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 5% probability (7% a week ago)
No .. 95% probability (93% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 97% probability (94% a week ago)
No .. 3% probability (6% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts), one month ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 69%, one month ago: 48%, one year ago: 80%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 72%, one month ago: 66%, one year ago: 70%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 53% (49% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 24% (29% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 23% (22% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 30 (Bullish by 27 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.18%, one month ago: 3.24%, one year ago: 3.90%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.52%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.16%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.27% to 0.24%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The surprising outcome of the French parliamentary elections the previous day, where the left, centre and right all essentially cancelled each other out to create a legislative power vacuum and potential political deadlock in France for years to come, caused nervousness and volatility in European markets on Monday, which continued for much of the week.
With such a big slate of upcoming potential catalysts; Fed chairman Jerome Powell talking in Congress for two days starting the next day, big inflation data coming out on Thursday and Friday, French election fallout and Q2 earnings season kicking off (and all of this with the potential to be overshadowed at any moment by a potential intensity spike in the Biden candidacy psychodrama), it was perhaps not surprising that traders in the U.S. weren’t willing to place any large bets to start the week and stock prices basically flatlined all day.
All eyes were on Washington DC on Tuesday, where Powell began facing two days of questions from mostly financially illiterate, grandstanding lawmakers in Congress. Wall Street tried to pick out any signals about the timing of future interest rate cuts from his words, but was mostly unable to do so other than from his bland familiar refrain that the Fed still needs “more good data” to strengthen the case that inflation is moving toward the central bank’s 2% target.
In the end, a nothing-burger came out of DC during the session and stock prices barely budged for the second day in a row, even though the S&P 500 and NASDAQ indexes still managed to sleepwalk themselves to marginal new all-time highs yet again.
Stocks began Wednesday in a buoyant mood with overnight reflection on Powell’s testimony having pushed the narrative further in the direction of a September interest rate cut (and maybe - just maybe - a shock cut later this month?). The optimism only accelerated as the day went on, with the S&P 500 closing above 5600 for the first time ever for its 37th all-time record high of the year. The NASDAQ joined in on the fun, reaching its 27th high. Importantly, the gains were broad-based across all market capitalizations, sectors and countries.
The latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation which was released pre-market on Thursday was pure Goldilocks. Prices actually fell in June, down -0.1% for an annualized inflation rate of +3.0% (the lowest since April 2021) and the Core (ex-food and energy) number to +3.3%. Importantly, under the hood, we saw a lot of price calming in important categories like housing and food which seem to have finally turned the corner and even insurance costs stabilizing. All of this was better than expected.
You would have thought that Wall Street would go into some kind of exuberance overdrive. But reality intervened when markets opened. The first few earnings reports of the Q2 season from the likes of Delta Airlines and PepsiCo were disappointing. Also, the market-driven probability of a rate cut in September had already run a lot higher to more than 80% before the CPI release and has now been pretty much priced in - ending the week at 94% (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below).
While the recently-struggling Small Cap indexes had a really good day on the back of rate cut optimism, the S&P 500 was hit by a severe bout of profit-taking and Mega Cap exhaustion concerns and the index fell quite heavily in spite of the fact that a lot more of its component stocks moved higher than lower. This implied a investor rotation from the recent winners to recent laggards.
This process was accelerated by nervousness surrounding social networks Meta/Facebook, Snap, Pinterest and Nextdoor as European Union regulators charged Elon Musk's X/Twitter with breaching its online content law and potentially liable for fines equating to 6% of its global revenue.
The afore-mentioned intensity spike in the Biden psychodrama came to pass on Friday after his horrendous, gaffe-ridden Thursday night. We also learned pre-market of a somewhat hotter-than-expected Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers and some mixed earnings from some of the big banks. With increasing difficulty, Wall Street continued to shrug off looming political uncertainty and managed to focus on improving interest rate cut prospects and stocks shifted solidly higher across the board with the indexes more than recovering all the previous day’s losses.
As if any more was needed, the Trump assassination attempt on Saturday has injected further drama and uncertainty into what is becoming a tumultuous election campaign, even four months out from polling. Wall Street may not be able to ignore it much longer.
Notwithstanding the last couple of days’ price action, the issue of the lack of breadth associated with the rally continues to be somewhat troublesome, given the recent performance canyon between Mega Cap and mostly AI-related stocks and the other 99% of the investable stock universe. Only 22% of S&P 500 components are performing as well as the index this year (historically a very low number) and seven of the eleven S&P 500 sectors recently fell to 52-week lows relative to the record-busting S&P 500 index itself. The longer this selectivity and discriminating demand exists, the greater the risk it ultimately poses to the rally.
Evidence of the slowing momentum of the US economy has shifted from anecdotal to data-driven in the last few weeks. The question now becomes; how fast is it slowing? The response is absolutely critical quite simply because a severe economic contraction will end this nine-month old bull market and could well reverse it, since it will likely disproportionately damage the prices of the stocks that been on a rocket-ride as the rally’s main drivers.
To be absolutely clear, I am not saying that such a contraction is going to happen. Right now, it is not happening. Jumping directly in front of a fast-moving freight train is always a foolish idea, price takes precedent at the end of the day and the dominant uptrend and market momentum needs to be highly respected.
What I am saying is the stock market at current valuations is not even acknowledging the possibility that a severe economic contraction could happen. And that is at least noteworthy and potentially concerning.
Just because storm clouds may be gathering on the horizon, it does not necessarily mean that a storm will hit us. It does mean, however, that we need to continue to monitor conditions closely to avoid being possibly blindsided.
OTHER NEWS ..
Does The Outcome Of A Presidential Election Matter To Stock Markets? .. The data says that it doesn’t. The S&P 500 rose 60% under Trump and has risen 60% under Biden. The index increased about 200% under each of the very different two-term presidencies of Reagan and Obama.
As for presidential campaigns, the only year before 2024 where there was significant market volatility in the final weeks going into an election since the 1950s was in 2008 when there was obviously a lot of other financial market stuff going at that time, to say the very least! Recent events, however, suggest that the 2024 campaign may be far more turbulent than usual and could create at least short term volatility if even more chaotic dominos start to fall.
Getting Into It .. Americans are playing the stock market in record numbers, with almost three in five investing in stocks, according to a Charles Schwab survey. Members of Gen Z start investing when they’re 19 years old on average compared with 32 years old for Gen X and 35 years old for Baby Boomers. Sports betting has also exploded, with Americans wagering more than $220 billion in the past five years, according to the American Gaming Association. Stock trading seems to be becoming interchangeable with the online betting in the sports world.
Don’t Mess With Texas? .. Against the traditional advice from the locals, Hurricane Beryl is severely messing with Texas and is comfortably coming out on top. The state’s power grid was no match for Beryl as millions lost electricity last week.
Exposed ..Private data of every AT&T mobile customer was exposed earlier this year in a massive hack, the company admitted last week. This is the second big hack suffered by the firm in the last twelve months. While it would appear that the most recently stolen data may not yet have been made public, this is clearly not a good look for AT&T or any of its security partners.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
A horrific cautionary tale about what happens when you work with the wrong kind of financial advisor.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Around fifty S&P 500 companies are scheduled to report their Q2 earnings this week, including Netflix, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Blackrock, Bank of America, UnitedHealth Group, American Express, United Airlines, Johnson & Johnson, Prologis, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Domino’s Pizza, D.R. Horton, Halliburton, SLB and ASML.
The main economic reports to watch for are Retail Sales data for June on Tuesday and the Leading Economic Index for June on Thursday.
The European Central Bank will announce its latest interest rate decision on Thursday and is widely expected to keep its target interest rate unchanged at 3.75%.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower) - up 4.4% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - down 1.7% for the week.
SECTOR DASHBOARD:
Sector Dashboard courtesy of The Sevens Report, data valid as of early last week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 0.9% last week, is up 17.8% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high (07/12/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 6.1% last week, is up 6.2% so far this year and ended the week 12.1% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.95%, one month ago: 6.95%, one year ago: 6.96%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 7% probability (8% a week ago)
No .. 93% probability (92% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 94% probability (77% a week ago)
No .. 6% probability (23% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts), one month ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 43%, one month ago: 48%, one year ago: 83%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
One week ago: 65%, one month ago: 67%, one year ago: 69%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 49% (42% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 29% (32% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 22% (26% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 27 (Bullish by 16 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.25%, one month ago: 3.19%, one year ago: 4.05%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.52%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.10%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.32% to 0.27%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Following the car crash of a presidential debate and an apparent outbreak of civil war in the Democratic party, Wall Street strategists and traders have already begun gaming out how an increasingly-likely Trump victory in November will look, especially as it was further enhanced by Monday’s Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity. As one analyst put it; “It’s still too soon to fully price in an election outcome, but probably not too early to leg into it”.
The sense is that a second Trump presidency would drive market interest rates higher on the back of the prospect of the widespread imposition of international tariffs feeding stagflation in the U.S., anticipated ballooning deficits and a President apparently intent on directly interfering in Fed interest rate policy.
Q3 and H2 began with a holiday-interrupted week on Monday and a return to what we have seen a lot of recently; Mega Tech performance papering over the cracks in the rest of the market. On the same day that the tech-heavy NASDAQ reached a new all-time record, three-quarters of the stocks in the S&P 500 moved lower.
As U.S. markets opened on Tuesday, the backdrop was rather miserable with European markets tumbling and oil prices near multi-month highs amid escalating tensions in the Middle East and hurricanes in the Atlantic, where Hurricane Beryl became the earliest-ever Category 5 storm in the area.
The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) showed open job positions increased to 8.14 million from a downwardly-revised 7.92 million reading in the prior month. That was somewhat higher than expected and could therefore be perceived as a small speed bump on the road to imminent interest rate cuts.
However, Mega Tech continued to backstop the rest of the market and the indexes moved moderately higher with the S&P 500 and NASDAQ both closing once again at all-time record highs in a low volume session that had one eye on Friday’s critical Jobs Report.
Wednesday was a half-day in advance of the July 4th holiday and the focus remained on the potential back-to-back fireworks, real ones at the following day’s celebrations and then possible metaphorical ones with Friday’s employment info. Predictably, the abbreviated session was something of a snoozer but even that couldn’t prevent marginal new record highs being reached yet again.
Following Thursday’s holiday, during which there was a strong intensification of the doubts surrounding Biden’s viability as a realistic presidential candidate, Wall Street trading desks operated with mostly skeleton crews on Friday even though probably the most important economic data point of the month, the Jobs Report, was released before the opening bell.
We learned that the U.S. added another 206k jobs last month, a bit more than had been expected, but there was a downward revision for the two previous months. The revisions helped bring the three-month average down to +177k, the slowest pace of job growth since January 2021 by that measure. The rate of unemployment slightly surprisingly ticked up to 4.1% and average hourly earnings were up +3.9% in June from a year earlier, marking their smallest gain since 2021.
This all seems to have confirmed Wall Street’s view that the economy is slowing, but not in a drastic way that would prompt more aggressive rate cuts. A hot labor market makes it more difficult to lower interest rates but there likely wasn’t anything in the report to lead Fed officials to push for a July rate cut. September, however, is still very much on the table (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below).
Friday’s thinly-populated stock market was moderately impressed and we saw a Goldilocks extension of the rally on rising hopes of that September rate cut, which of course generated more new record highs for the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ.
Attention turned towards a potentially consequential upcoming several days in U.S. politics with a Biden ABC interview airing that night and an apparently growing group of Democratic lawmakers, donors and party activists getting louder and louder about the need for a change of candidate, especially as more states now seem poised to slip into battleground territory. Electoral politics was also rumbling in the background elsewhere in the world (see below).
Also on Wall Street’s mind in the upcoming days will be the fact that the Q2 earnings season begins this week with the traditional curtain-raiser of results from the big banks and we’ll get some more critical inflation data (see THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR below).
OTHER NEWS .. OVERSEAS ELECTIONS EDITION
While the November election here has suddenly rushed to the front of the news agenda in the last week or so, the UK and France are at the end of their electoral campaign cycles.
Former British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was brutally booted from power as voters mercilessly punished his scandal-ridden center-right Conservative Party, which suffered a historic thrashing after more than 14 years in power. This was only the second change of government in the country in 27 years.
The new UK PM is Sir Kier Starmer,the leader of the center-left Labour Party which consigned the Conservatives to the worst defeat in their entire history (the party was founded in 1834), with a record-breaking number of senior cabinet ministers (and also former Prime Minister Liz Truss) losing their parliamentary seats and now out of a job. Another record set in this election was the number of votes cast for other smaller parties, some of them with much more extremist agendas, beyond the traditional duopoly of Conservative and Labour.
Unlike in the United States, the leader of the winning party in a UK election takes over as Prime Minister immediately, within hours of the result being determined. Local financial markets had long ago priced in this landslide Labour victory and there was very little immediate reaction.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the English Channel, centrist French President Emanuel Macron’s enormous gamble to call early parliamentary elections when he didn’t have to has been variously described as “an incomprehensibly rash decision” and “playing Russian Roulette with the fate of the nation”. It appears to have massively backfired. In the second and decisive poll this weekend, it seems likely that the far-right National Rally party of Marine LePen will come out on top, maybe even with an outside chance of a working majority in the French parliament, which would install 28 year-old Jordan Bardella as Prime Minister. Results are expected to be confirmed tonight.
The French political system allows for “cohabitation” between a President and an ideologically-opposed Prime Minister and there are still three years left until the next scheduled Presidential election. Local financial markets have been very jittery, uncertain about National Rally’s economic agenda and fearing the political gridlock that may result from a cohabitation outcome with Macron effectively becoming a lame duck President for a very extended period of time.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Two-thirds of existing mortgages with <4% interest rates. $100k income households only being able to afford 37% of home listings (normally 62%) ..Welcome to America’s frozen, broken housing market.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
U.S. inflation data and the first handful of Q2 earnings reports will be the highlights this week. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, will sit for two days of testimony before lawmakers.
The latest earnings season kicks off this week with results incoming from JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, Bank of New York Mellon, PepsiCo and Delta Air Lines.
The economic-data highlight of the week will be the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for June. The consensus estimate calls for a +0.1% increase during the month, after the index was unchanged in May. The important Core reading, is expected to be up +0.2% month-over-month. We will also get to see the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers in June.
Powell will deliver his semi-annual Monetary Policy Report to Congress this week. He'll start on Tuesday before the Senate Committee on Banking, before moving to the House Financial Services Committee on Wednesday. Wall Street will be listening carefully to what he has to say.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 3.4% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 1.2% for the week.
SECTOR DASHBOARD:
Sector Dashboard courtesy of The Sevens Report, data valid as of early last week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.7% last week, is up 16.7% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high (07/05/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 0.2% last week, is up 0.1% so far this year and ended the week 17.2% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.86%, one month ago: 6.99%, one year ago: 6.81%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 8% probability (10% a week ago)
No .. 92% probability (90% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 77% probability (64% a week ago)
No .. 23% probability (36% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts), one month ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 47%, one month ago: 48%, one year ago: 76%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 68%, one month ago: 69%, one year ago: 62%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 42% (45% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 32% (27% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 26% (28% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 16 (Bullish by 17 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.21%, one month ago: 3.20%, one year ago: 3.99%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.53%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.22%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.35% to 0.32%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Last week saw the end of the month, Q2 and H1. As I will summarize next week in my Q2 Quarterly Report, stock indexes broadly did ok over these periods, but last week confirmed that some two-way volatility is creeping into the Mega Tech names that have carried this eight month rally. The highlights of the week were always going to be the presidential debate and some big inflation data on Friday, but I’m not sure the needle moved much.
A broadly sluggish session to start the week on Monday was characterized mainly by a continued deepening price deterioration in the recent “darling” risk assets of AI stocks and crypto. Nvidia (NVDA) plunged again to reach a 13%+ correction, shedding $430 billion in value in just three trading days (that’s more than the entire value of Mastercard!) - but 70% of the Large Cap S&P 500 stocks actually moved higher on the day. This further exposed the divergence that I’ve been referencing in this report for months. Bitcoin had its worst day in years. Even the hottest trades are not one-way bets.
In a complete reversal of fortunes on Tuesday, there was a solid rebound in AI and crypto, with NVDA recovering all of its Monday losses. Dip-buyers can take most of the credit. At the same time, big consumer names like Walmart, Nike and Home Depot all struggled on fears that the relentless level of Americans’ retail spending may be starting to top out.
Things stabilized somewhat on Wednesday with stock prices across the board drifting around aimlessly, despite decent earnings and outlook from Fedex (FDX), considered to be something of a proxy for the current state of economic conditions.
Thursday was another uneventful one ahead of the debate that evening and the important inflation data the next day. Mega Tech continued its recovery but Walgreens (WBA), a favorite of dividend stock hunters but recently booted from the Dow Jones Industrial Average index, got punished really hard after some very undistinguished quarterly results.
The excruciating first (and very possibly only) presidential debate on Thursday night simultaneously reduced and increased political uncertainty. On one hand, much of the doubt about the outcome of a Trump v. Biden head-to-head is now rapidly evaporating as a result of what we all saw on Thursday night. But the now somewhat more elevated sense that Biden is simply no longer a viable candidate, leading to a Trump v. ?? head-to-head, could inject a massive level of ambiguity into the process.
The week, the month, Q2 and H1 came to an end with something of whimper on Friday. Wall Street decided to, for the moment, put growing political volatility concerns on the shelf as something to worry about later, choosing instead to focus on the publication of the important Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price indexwhich increased just 0.1% for the month and showed that this measure of annualized inflation fell to 2.6%, the lowest reading since March 2021.
Wall Street’s response was something of a shrug, partially because the numbers mostly matched expectations and also because the major indexes are trading not far below all-time record levels and this data certainly wasn’t unexpectedly spectacular enough news to push anything meaningfully higher from there. In the end, we saw prices sink a little on pretty low volume.
There is an old adage on Wall Street that “Bull markets climb a wall of worry; bear markets slide down a river of hope.” The stock market, excluding select Mega Caps, remains in a corrective phase since mid-May which is still unresolved.
It is important to recognize that the top three stocks in the market: Microsoft (MSFT), Apple (AAPL), and Nvidia, now make up 20% of the weight of the entire S&P 500 Index and NVDA alone represents 20% of the Technology sector. Out of eleven sectors, only the Technology and Communication Services sectors are outpacing the YTD gains by the S&P 500 index.
In order to reignite broad demand and further gains in stock prices, Wall Street needs to have a more concrete sense of the Federal Reserve's first interest rate cut and some stability at least in U.S. consumer behavior that seems to turning negative. In order for stocks to rally from here, there needs to be a broadening out in the number of stocks fueling the gains.
There remains a lot of noise in this market about economic growth, inflation, earnings, the Fed, geopolitics and coming up soon, the election. But, for all the noise, the facts remain as such: The bullish mantra that has powered stocks higher since November of last year remains largely intact.
And as long as that remains the case, then the downside risks for this market should remain limited. That said, we should continue to be concerned about the rate at which growth is slowing, not so much because of any recession risk but instead because, at these price valuations, any significant moderation in growth is simply not built in.
OTHER NEWS ..
Beep, Beeeeep .. New York City hadthe world’s worst congestion for the second year in a row, costing the city an estimated $9.1 billion in lost time. In total, traffic congestion is estimated to have cost the U.S. over $70 billion. Other U.S. cities in the top ten include Chicago, Los Angeles and Boston. Mexico City ranked second on the list, followed by London and Paris.
Greed is Good .. The FTX bankruptcy was looking like a hedge-fund trade for the ages. Many of them were set to make hundreds of millions of dollars for intrepid vulture investors buying claims from impacted investors. Then things got messy. Hedge funds and other distressed investors rejoiced last month when bankruptcy managers said the corporate carcass of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried’s collapsed crypto exchange, had enough assets to more than make its creditors whole.
Since FTX’s 2022 implosion, hedge funds had scooped up the rights to customers’ frozen accounts for pennies on the dollar, with five firms alone buying claims with a combined face value of about $2.4 billion. That meant a huge payday was in store. But, according to a Wall Street Journal article last week, many former FTX customers are abruptly reneging on deals and lawyering up after suffering from seller’s remorse.
The core problem underlying this is that FTX claim values have jumped as the prospect of a larger eventual payout has grown, thanks in part to a fierce rebound in crypto prices. That means many FTX clients who sold their claims quickly missed out on getting a better price later on or securing a direct payout from the FTX estate.
Highly Organized Forward Planners Rejoice! .. Disney’s Florida theme parks will let visitors reserve a space for shorter lines on rides as much as one week in advance, in an effort to address complaints about the process.
Disney hotel guests will be able to book ride reservations seven days ahead for their entire stay. Others can do so three days in advance. Presently park attendees can only book spots on the day of their visit, with many waking up at 7 a.m. to get first crack at them. The changes take effect July 24th.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
When investing is NOT like poker.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Stock and bond markets will close early on Wednesday and remain closed on Thursday in observance of Independence Day.
It’s an interrupted jobs week in the U.S. On Tuesday, we get the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) report. It’s expected to show 7.9 million job openings on the last business day of May, which would be roughly 150k less from April.
Then we see the critical June Jobs Report on Friday. The consensus call is for 195k new payrolls created, after a 272k gain in May. The unemployment rate is forecast to stay at 4.0%.
In between on Wednesday, the Federal Open Market Committee will publish minutes from its recent mid-June meeting.
The first round of voting in the two-part French parliamentary elections takes place this weekend, possibly opening the door to a historic shift in the political and economic landscape in Europe.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil) - up 1.6% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) for the second week in a row - down 1.6% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 0.1% last week, is up 14.6% so far this year and ended the week 0.7% below its all-time record closing high (06/18/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 1.3% last week, is up 1.1% so far this year and ended the week 16.3% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.87%, one month ago: 7.03.%, one year ago: 6.71%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 10% probability (10% a week ago)
No .. 90% probability (90% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 64% probability (75% a week ago)
No .. 36% probability (25% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts), one month ago: 5.125% (implying one rate cut)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 52%, one month ago: 43%, one year ago: 65%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 68%, one month ago: 64%, one year ago: 60%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 45% (44% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 27% (33% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 28% (23% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 17 (Bullish by 21 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.23%, one month ago: 3.15%, one year ago: 4.27%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.38%) is being paid for the 3-month duration and the lowest rate (4.33%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.45% to 0.35%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Stocks moved cautiously higher in a bifurcated week, with the S&P 500 achieving its eighth weekly advance from the last nine and ending up just south of all-time record levels, but tech stocks started slumping later in the week, particularly AI-related ones. With a jam-packed week coming up in terms of important economic data releases, there are some concerns that any disappointments could trigger something of a sell-off from these stratospheric levels.
The S&P 500 and NASDAQ indexes both closed at record highs yet again on Monday (that was the 30th record day this year for the S&P 500 and the sixth record day in a row for the NASDAQ), driven by another powerful rally (although notably on relatively low volume) in several AI-related Big Tech names, after Morgan Stanley called rising concerns about the possible over-valuation of AI-related stock prices “misguided”.
There was something of a rebound in European markets, recently battered by political turmoil across the continent. Treasury interest rates stayed muted which is helping a lot. Wall Street seems to be doing the Fed’s job for it, pushing market rates lower and lower over the last couple of weeks.
On Tuesday morning we learned that Retail Sales barely budged in May, rising just 0.1% and the prior months were revised lower. This pointed to a notable downshift in consumer spending after stronger readings earlier in the year.
Wall Street seemed unable to decide whether this was a welcome pullback that allows the economy to cool just enough to tame inflation and facilitate imminent Fed interest rate cuts or was a more ominous trend that hinted at deepening economic weakness.
With the day feeling a bit like a synthetic Friday ahead of the midweek market closure due to the Juneteenth holiday, the result was a low-trading-volume lackluster session with no real conviction either way, but Nvidia did manage to end Apple’s brief one week stint as the world biggest company by catapulting into the #1 spot with a $3.3 trillion+ valuation.
After a day off on Wednesday, traders put their game faces back on again on Thursday. Before the U.S. markets opened, the Bank of England kept local interest rates unchanged (unsurprising in the midst of a general election campaign) but the Swiss National Bank raised some eyebrows with another rate cut.
Stock prices pulled back a little, particularly in some of the AI tech names that had soared recently, resulting in Nvidia’s spell as the biggest company in the world coming to an end after just one trading day, ceding the spot as top dog to Microsoft.
Friday was a “triple-witching day” on the futures and options exchanges with about $5.5 trillion dollars’-worth of contracts in indexes, single-stocks and ETFs expiring along with multiple index rebalances. Triple-witching days are often characterized by prodigious amounts of hedging trades in mostly big name stocks, often in the last few minutes of the trading day, as institutional traders roll over existing positions or start new ones and the rebalancing of indexes can require significant purchases and sales of particular stocks that are respectively entering or exiting the index.
Stock prices sank further at the open, again pushed lower by AI names dropping further, but then stayed pretty stagnant the rest of the day. The triple-witching volatility kept within a narrow range and fears of related wild price swings never materialized.
I’m not a huge fan of technical analysis, but certain data points can be valuable in assessing where we stand, particularly at possible specific milestones. I know a lot of readers just read or listen to the first part of my weekly reports without looking too hard at the second part where all the numbers lie (LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below), but there are definitely some technical breadcrumbs there when it comes to getting a picture of the situation in financial markets right now ..
While the S&P and the NASDAQ are relentlessly reaching new highs ..
we would expect a least a majority of the eleven sectors to be in a technical uptrend but just two (Technology and Utilities) are, based on their setups, momentum readings and relative performance to the broader market. Interestingly, these two sectors are 1) the traditionally most volatile and 2) the traditionally least volatile. This is unusual and underscores the extremely thin leadership in the stock market right now.
the number of S&P 500 stocks trading above their 200-day moving averages (see below) fell to a new 2024 low. This is a significant and potentially meaningful divergence with the performance of the index itself which continues to make record highs over and over again That doesn’t happen often. The takeaway is that the average stock is actually struggling, despite what we see in Mega Cap world.
the Fear and Greed Index from CNN takes into account a multitude of factors (see the details below) and measures the mood and confidence of market participants. Typically when markets are moving higher and certainly when multiple new highs are continually being recorded, you would expect the reading to head quickly into the Greed Zone, then eventually into the Extreme Greed Zone where the danger of the acute risk-on sentiment causing a swift, sharp reversal in prices becomes more elevated, with a crowded trade and and all bets being one-way. This is how markets cycle. However, we ended last week stuck in the Fear Zone indicating that many professionals seem to feel concerned that the current exuberance may be misplaced when applied to all of the S&P 500 stocks.
As I alluded to in last week’s report, a microscopic number of stocks are driving everything right now. For example, just one stock, (NVDA) is responsible for more than a third of the S&P 500’s 14%+ gain so far this year, which is historically unheard of outside the tech bubble in the early 2000s. For my younger readers, that ended badly.
The data from the stock exchanges and the options market are showing that frothy retail investors and underperforming institutional traders are chasing gains in a FOMO frenzy only in this tiny subset of names instead of fishing in the overall broad market.
The vitality brought about by AI mania better not subside anytime soon because there have been weeks recently when it was literally the only reason that the indexes moved higher. That is why Thursday and Friday’s negative price action in AI is troubling.
Any continued backsliding in AI stocks would mean that the market will have seen some damage to two of the four “pillars of the rally” (stable growth, falling inflation, sooner-than-later rate cuts and AI enthusiasm) which would mean that the outlook for stock markets in general would worsen, not strengthen. This is especially true since the market now assumes that the two other pillars (falling inflation and imminent Fed rate cuts) are happening anyway, which means they are less substantial influences on how markets move now.
While risks to this rally continue to build in the distance, mostly in the form of a potential economic slowdown, the path of least resistance in the medium term remains higher for stocks with Mega Cap Tech poised to continue leading the bullish charge higher. Until it doesn’t.
In the words of the late, great David Bowie, “Take your protein pills and put your helmet on.”
OTHER NEWS ..
Housing Data Update [Prospective New Buyers, Cover Your Eyes] .. We got a lot of insight into the housing market last week. Mortgage rates fell again, reaching their lowest level since early April. Bigger picture though, it’s cold comfort for buyers looking at rates that are still almost triple what they were just three years ago (plus the massively inflated cost of homeowner’s insurance).
Wednesday’s print on new-home construction was gloomy, we saw a 5.5% drop in housing starts in May to the slowest pace since June 2020 and the previous months were revised lower. Compared to May of last year, new housing starts are now 19.3% lower, driven by softer multi-family construction. If you are looking for a silver lining, those kind of slowdowns could ease the rate inflation.
The data pile-on continued the next day when we learned that existing home prices rose in May to a new high with low inventory continuing to spur bidding wars in some markets. The national median existing-home price (which is not inflation-adjusted) rose to $419,300, a new record high since the data began being collected in 1999. This is 5.8% up from a year earlier.
Come On In! .. With immigration high on the election agenda, it was interesting to learn last week that the U.S. is projected to gain 3,800 millionaires from overseas in 2024. Only the United Arab Emirates expects to welcome more than that. The greatest numbers are leaving the China and the UK.
It Might Not Feel Like It But .. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, it now takes about the same number of hours (3.6 hours) for an average non-managerial worker to buy a week’s worth of groceries as it did in 2019 before the pandemic and the sky-high inflation era. Because wage growth has outpaced grocery price growth, it takes slightly less work to purchase a bag of groceries relative to a year ago.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Great investing lessons to take from analyzing Roger Federer’s tennis career.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
There’ll be a lot to digest this week.
FedEx, Nike, Walgreens, Micron, Carnival and General Mills release results in the coming five days.
Importantly, the latest Durable Goods report will be released.
Even more importantly, we will get a final and decisive Gross Domestic Product (GDP) reading for Q1 2024
Most importantly, we will see the latest Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index for May. This data point is what the Fed uses to judge what inflation is doing. Both the headline and core indexes are forecast to show a 2.6% annualized inflation rate.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) for the second week in a row - up 1.8% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 1.0% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 0.4% last week, is up 14.6% so far this year and ended the week 0.7% below its all-time record high (06/20/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 0.7% last week, is down 0.2% so far this year and ended the week 17.4% below its all-time record high (11/08/2021).
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.95%, one month ago: 6.94%, one year ago: 6.67%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 10% probability (12% a week ago)
No .. 90% probability (88% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 75% probability (68% a week ago)
No .. 25% probability (32% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts), one month ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 42%, one month ago: 61%, one year ago: 63%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 64%, one month ago: 78%, one year ago: 55%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 44% (45% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 33% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 23% (25% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 21 (Bullish by 20 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.20%, one month ago: 3.27%, one year ago: 4.22%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.49%) is being paid for the 3-month duration and the lowest rate (4.25%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.47% to 0.45%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Last week was all about Big Wednesday, with pretty limited price movements on any of the other four days. Interest rate cut sentiment has now swung back to more hopeful again, with the futures-driven expected number of interest rate cuts this year moving up from one to two. This was in the same week that the Fed moved its own projection of the number of 2024 cuts lower from three to one. Huh? The S&P 500 posted its seventh weekly gain in the last eight weeks.
As a highly consequential week began on Monday, Wall Street was laser-focused on a potentially massive day on Wednesday with the latest inflation data and the Federal Reserve interest rate announcement / quarterly dot plot chart / Chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference all coming within hours of each other. Stocks spent most of the week’s first session playing defense, hovering around the unchanged line. Small gains were eventually eked out by the close, with markets holding their collective breath ahead of Wednesday’s possible earthquake.
After a stuttering start on Tuesday, stock indexes turned things around later in the day, especially those with a heavy weighting in Apple (AAPL) whose price broke out, surging over 7% during the session to a new record high on the back of its AI integration announcement (see OTHER NEWS below) and once again eclipsing Microsoft (MSFT) as the biggest company in the world by market value. The S&P 500 closed at yet another all-time record high before Wall Street traders headed home for a mug of hot cocoa and an early night ahead of the following day’s guaranteed drama.
Financial D-Day began on Wednesday with the very Fed-friendly pre-market release of the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation which showed that, according to the headline rate, there was basically zero inflation in the U.S. in the month of May and that the annualized rate has fallen to +3.3%. The more important Core inflation rate, which strips out food and energy costs, showed a lower-than-expected +0.2% increase in May and +3.4% annualized, cooling to the slowest pace in more than three years.
The interest rate environment began changing before our very eyes. Treasury rates plunged with the 10-year rate plummeting to its lowest levels of the year and both stocks and bonds were off to the races, exploding out of the gate the moment the market opened, including AAPL roaring even higher again and both Alphabet/Google (GOOGL) and Oracle (ORCL) reaching their own new record all-time highs during the session.
The Dot Plot report of the Fed’s economic projections, notably prepared before the CPI release, showed the average number of interest rate cuts in 2024 anticipated by the committee members falling from three in the previous report in March to just one this time around (four of nineteen committee members even projected no cuts at all this year). However, it raised average expectations for the number of cuts in 2025 from three to four.
Wall Street looked at all this and seemed to pivot to the idea that an increased risk of recession caused by the Fed not cutting interest rates appears to now outweigh the increased risk of inflation caused by cutting them. Stock prices eased a touch following Powell’s press conference but still finished the day with very healthy gains, with the S&P 500 and NASDAQ having galloped even deeper into all-time record territory.
On Thursday morning, the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers confirmed an apparent resumption of the inflation downturn, with prices actually falling by -0.2% in May, versus an expectation of a small increase, for an annualized rate of just +2.2%.
Stock prices bounced around a bit following Wednesday’s euphoria, finishing the session a smidge higher with the S&P 500 scoring its fourth consecutive record close, but markets appeared to still be digesting the previous day’s somewhat bewildering information dump.
The indexes took a breather on Friday, going nowhere basically, even though the NASDAQ advanced fractionally to record its latest all-time record high.
The top four U.S. stocks by market valuation that drive the indexes – Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA and Alphabet/Google – have now swollen to a valuation of over $11 trillion (that’s $11,000,000,000,000), meaning that they now collectively account for well over 20% of the total U.S. stock market value (and growing by the day) and just these four stocks alone are bigger than every other stock market in the world, including China, Japan and all the Europeans.
Other than providing a handy dinner party anecdote (you’re welcome!), there are two important things to take from this.
Properly diversified portfolios will also contain the other 496 Large-caps, Mid-caps, Small-caps, Micro-caps, European stocks, Asian stocks and Emerging Market stocks and none of these are even close to matching the recent performance of those four stocks. So Teflon-index-watching investors may not even notice (until it’s too late) if things were to start deteriorating fast and hard among the vast majority of stocks.
To be a thousand percent clear, these are concerns about what may happen in the future, not what is currently happening. But it’s important to recognize that the aggregated data is beginning to show that things might potentially be heading in that direction.
OTHER NEWS (APPLE AND ELON EDITION) ..
Apple Jumps In The AI Deep End .. Apple announced its long-awaited new artificial intelligence features last Monday, including tools supported by OpenAI’s ChatGPT. The company says the platform, called Apple Intelligence, will help summarize text, create original images and retrieve the most relevant data when users need it. “AI for the rest of us”, according to the tech giant who also unveiled new versions of operating systems for the iPhone, iPad and Mac. The stock zoomed higher to new record highs in response (see above).
One person not so impressed is famously freedom-loving and consumer-choice advocate Elon Musk who bizarrely announced that he would ban all iPhones from the properties of the multiple companies he runs if Apple’s plans went ahead.
(Even More) Toxic Elon Revelations .. In other Elon news, the Wall Street Journal dropped a bombshell report on Tuesday based on conversations with over fifty people and having viewed many text messages, essentially exposing Musk as a sex pest acting with impunity at his Space X company, persistently sexually harassing multiple current and former employees and college interns and indulging in power-imbalanced inappropriate behavior with a number of them, including arranging to have sex with an employee at his home with his children asleep upstairs.
He also allegedly offered to buy a horse for one woman in exchange for a sex act, flew another over to Europe using a private jet to stay in his hotel room during a Google conference he was attending there and taking professional retribution against those who either turned down his predatory advances or broke off romantic relationships before he was quite ready to.
The day after the report dropped, a related law suit was filed against Musk which further expanded the laundry list of revelations, including that he personally “interjected into the workplace vile sexual photographs” and internally distributed explicit videos, even participating in some including one demonstrating the “correct” method of spanking a co-worker.
Predictably, Musk denied the allegations through his lawyers - as he has regularly done with similar accusations over the years from other employees, as well as ongoing claims that his rampant drug use has an effect on his judgement.
The legal action came on the eve of the announcement of the outcome of a Tesla shareholder vote about giving Musk a compensation package of $56 billion even though he has overseen a 56% decline in its share price since it peaked in November 2021. The vote passed.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Keep on top of your damn beneficiary designations!! A cautionary tale.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This will be a holiday-shortened week for U.S. investors, with markets closed on Wednesday in observance of Juneteenth.
Still a few more Q2 earnings announcements are due including CarMax, Accenture, Lennar, KB Homes, Darden Restaurants and Kroger.
The only major economic data coming out will be Retail Sales for May. Tuesday.
On Thursday, both the Bank of England (BOE) and the Swiss National Bank (SNB) will announce monetary-policy decisions. The SNB is expected to follow up its March cut with a second quarter-point reduction. The BOE is forecast to hold its benchmark rate target unchanged.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) for the second week in a row - up 5.6% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 2.4% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.6% last week, is up 14.2% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record high.
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 1.4% last week, is down 1.0% so far this year and ended the week 18.1% below its all-time record high (11/08/2021).
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 0.4% last week, is up 4.1% so far this year and is up 16.6% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.99%, one month ago: 7.02%, one year ago: 6.69%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 12% probability (8% a week ago)
No .. 88% probability (92% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on September 18th?
Yes .. 68% probability (50% a week ago)
No .. 32% probability (50% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 5.125% (implying one rate cut), one month ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 48%, one month ago: 63%, one year ago: 69%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 67%, one month ago: 80%, one year ago: 61%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 45% (39% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 30% (29% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 25% (32% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 20 (Bullish by 7 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.20%, one month ago: 3.08%, one year ago: 4.18%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 3-month duration and the lowest rate (4.20%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.44% to 0.47%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Last week provided a perfect example of how you can create any narrative you like simply by cherry-picking data. The glass-is-half full crowd needed to look no further than central banks around the world last week starting the interest-rate cutting cycle, job openings data showing an orderly resumption of pre-COVID labor market normality backed up by stats showing unemployment at an economically-ideal 4% and over two-thirds of stocks now trading above their 200-day moving average.
Team Trouble Ahead could instead point to a scorching, out-of-control Jobs Report last week that is wrecking the Fed’s plans to lower interest rates any time soon in a stagnating economy, whispers of the need to raise rates instead of cutting them growing louder all the time and less than 50% of stocks now trading above their 50-day moving average.
Stocks fell early on Monday, helped lower by a report showing that U.S. factory activity shrank at a much faster pace than expected, indeed manufacturing output appears to have come close to stagnating. As the session wore on, however, prices slowly clawed their way back and a last-gasp surge meant the S&P 500 actually finished the day fractionally higher.
On Tuesday morning we learned from the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) that the number of job openings in the U.S. fell to 8.06m, that’s 1.8m less than a year ago and its lowest level in over three years, implying a continuation of a Fed-friendly, slow-motion and relatively low-pain cooldown in the labor market.
Once upon a time not so long ago stocks might have been expected to immediately shift higher on the back of such data, but it was met with an indifferent shrug by Wall Street. Stock prices initially drifted a little lower then perked up a bit after lunch but there was little conviction either way and the market’s attention began to turn to Friday’s main event, the Jobs Report.
There was a lot of green on the screen on Wednesday partly as a bit of a delayed reaction to Tuesday’s pro-Fed-interest-rate-cut JOLTS data and partly on the back of a rather surprising actual rate cut from the Bank of Canada (BOC), the first of the big global central banks to start an interest rate reduction cycle. Business borrowing conditions continued easing as Treasury interest rates fell for the fifth day in a row and stocks sprang sharply back into all-time record high territory again for both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ.
On Thursday morning the European Central Bank (ECB) followed the BOC’s lead with its own widely-anticipated first interest rate cut since 2019 to 3.75% -widening the margin by which it is lower than the Fed’s rate to 1.625%. U.S. stock prices returned to snooze mode ahead of the important jobs data the next day and basically went nowhere the entire session.
On Friday morning, the Jobs Report proved to be a confusing mess for the Fed. Payrolls smashed through estimates with a jaw-dropping 272k (average estimate: 180k) new jobs created in May but the unemployment rate rose to 4.0% for the first time since late 2021 (average estimate: 3.9%). The rate of annual wage growth increased by a higher-than-expected 0.4% in May to 4.1% annualized.
This all raised questions about whether the Fed’s interest rate policy is biting hard enough in terms of its goal of cooling the labor market, in turn handing a big “I Told You So” to that still-small but growing group who see a scenario of the next Fed move having to be an increase rather than a cut in interest rates. The last dregs of a market-driven probability of a rate cut in July evaporated completely and the likelihood of a rate cut before the election fell below 50/50 for the first time.
Once again the stock market did not react as one might have expected. Instead of plunging, it rather uncharacteristically took the report mostly in its stride, remaining reasonably calm even though Treasury interest rates spiked back, ending the session with relatively tame losses, all things considered and the S&P 500 and NASDAQ maintained their gains for the week.
The Q2 earnings season is all but over and the general sentiment is that things were “fine”. However, beyond the glitzy releases from the Fab Five, you can find signs of froth if you are looking for them. U.S. public companies are the absolute best in the world at controlling costs and maintaining margins and it was really this superpower that caused Q2 to be regarded in a good light, rather than overwhelming evidence of solid aggregate demand.
Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen numerous companies from multiple industries post disappointing results and projections on a combination of underwhelming sales and margins. The number of companies expressing concerns on earnings calls about reduced demand or a more discerning consumer is rising quickly.
This, of course feeds into the absolute biggest concern for financial markets .. a sudden sharp economic slowdown that has not in any way been factored in to where stock prices currently sit.
None of this means that the S&P 500 can’t run up another 5%-10% if we get good vibes from Jerome Powell this week after the do-nothing June Fed meeting, evidence that inflation has resumed its downward trajectory in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation, a drop in Treasury yields and continued bottomless AI enthusiasm but the evidence of slowing growth is increasing on both the macro- and micro-economic fronts and I personally think markets are being a bit too complacent about it.
OTHER NEWS ..
A Wild Ride .. Nvidia rose over 5% on Wednesday, briefly becoming the world’s second-largest company ahead of Apple and behind Microsoft and also became just the third company ever to break through the $3 trillion ($3,000,000,000,000) valuation level just three months after first topping $2 trillion. However, a government announcement the following day of an anti-trust investigation into the firm saw the valuation then dip back down to below both that of Apple and the $3T level.
Buyers Aren’t Standing For It Any More .. The U.S. housing market - long crippled by an inventory drought - is finally starting to see listings rise after what has essentially been a revolt among potential homebuyers brought about by both mortgage rates and prices showing no signs of moving lower. In many places, buyers just aren’t showing up any more. Previously-spoiled sellers are grappling with demand being choked off during what’s typically the hot season. As inventory grows stale, more owners are being forced to cut their asking prices than at any time since November 2022, according to Redfin Corp.
He’s Baaaaack .. Meanwhile in the tiresome world of meme stocks, the highly anticipated YouTube livestream from the High Priest of Meme, Keith “Roaring Kitty” Gill on Friday lasted 48 minutes with beer, props, awkward attempts at humor and stock charts and had as many as 650k people watching at its peak. GameStop shares promptly tanked 40% and trading was halted by the exchange 17 times after the firm decided to drop an unexpected earnings report showing a 30% plunge in sales revenue and announced a share-sale plan. Oh dear.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Want to Pay Cash? That’ll Cost You Extra
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
It will be a huge week on the macroeconomic and monetary policy fronts.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for May comes out pre-market on Wednesday morning. just hours before the Fed announces its June meeting interest rate decision at 2pm ET swiftly followed by chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference. Markets are overwhelmingly pricing in no chance of a change in the committee's federal-funds interest rate target.
The following day, we get the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers.
We will hear from the Bank of Japan about its interest rate decision on Friday.
Oracle, Broadcom and Adobe will report earnings this week. Apple will host its annual developers' conference on Monday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) - up 2.4% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 3.8% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.1% last week, is up 12.4% so far this year and ended the week 0.1% below its all-time record high (06/06/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 2.4% last week, is up 0.2% so far this year and ended the week 17.0% below its all-time record high (11/08/2021).
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 0.9% last week, is up 3.5% so far this year and is up 16.6% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 7.03%, one month ago: 7.09%, one year ago: 6.71%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 2% probability (1% a week ago)
No .. 98% probability (99% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 8% probability (14% a week ago)
No .. 92% probability (86% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 5.125% (implying one rate cut), one month ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 50%, one month ago: 57%, one year ago: 50%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 71%, one month ago: 76%, one year ago: 53%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 39% (39% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 29% (34% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 32% (27% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 7 (Bullish by 12 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.19%, one month ago: 3.14%, one year ago: 4.29%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.52%) is being paid for the 3-month duration and the lowest rate (4.43%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.37% to 0.44%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The melt-up momentum in U.S. stocks since late October of last year is showing signs of faltering after a mixed four trading days ended a five-week winning streak. It may be dawning on investors that “higher for longer” interest rates might be undergoing a rebrand to “higher for the foreseeable future”. There’s certainly not very much right now that is serving to create any sense of urgency for the Fed to cut interest rates.
Having said all that, the month of May came to an end and it was a positive one for all the major stock indexes after a tough April.
Markets opened cautiously on Tuesday, following a Memorial Day long weekend which saw increasing violence and an escalating death toll in the Middle East, including an exchange of fire across the Egypt/Israel border. Fed speakers continued their “Higher For Longer” tour, hammering home the message about interest rates every time they found themselves within ten feet of a microphone, even occasionally re-raising the specter of a potential need to raise rates instead of cutting them.
By the end of the day, however, the NASDAQ had reached another record high, closing above 17,000 for the first time ever. It was driven upwards by seemingly never-ending frantic buying of Nvidia stock (NVDA), which is now worth more than the combined value of Amazon (AMZN), Walmart (WMT) and Netflix (NFLX). The other broad indexes, however, all finished mostly flat for the session.
Concerns about rapidly rising intermediate Treasury interest rates gripped markets on Wednesday and stocks took a substantial dive at the open and stayed down in the dumps all day with the S&P 500 sinking back below 5300 again. Things weren’t helped by poor results and downbeat outlooks from American Airlines (AAL) and UnitedHealth Group (UNH) which caused negative contagion among other stocks in their respective industry groups.
The first of the week’s two big data releases, the second of three official Gross Domestic Product (GDP) estimates, was released on Thursday morning and we learned that the U.S. economy grew at 1.3% annual pace in Q1, the slowest pace in almost two years and below expectations, largely because of softening consumer spending.
Stock prices remained under pressure even though Treasury yields did ease a touch following the GDP release. Investors suffered another down-day (particularly Salesforce (CRM) which swiftly fell 20% after a poorly-received earnings report), with markets bracing for the following day’s inflation data.
Trump’s criminal conviction on all felony counts came after market hours on Thursday, giving Wall Street time to decide by the opening bell on Friday that it didn’t really care. It chose instead to focus on perhaps the most influential inflation reading, the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, which came out pre-market and increased 0.2% between March and April and 2.8% year-on-year. This was all exactly as expected and while it showed that inflation may not be quite as sticky as some fear, it was considered unlikely to have had much impact on the Fed’s thinking
This stopped the bleeding at least and despite Dell (DELL) being brutally punished simply for not quite meeting crazy-high expectations, stocks recovered some of the ground lost in the two previous sessions.
Markets can’t go up every day and we will doubtless experience more volatility in the short term. As I have been faithfully documenting in these reports each week, the number one cause of market turbulence has been Wall Street’s constantly-fluid expectations for when the Fed will cut interest rates.
In April, stocks dropped because markets thought the Fed might not cut rates at all in 2024 or, heaven forbid, even raise them again. In the first half of May, that chatter quietened down, markets rebounded and thought the Fed could cut interest rates twice in 2024 with the first cut probably in September. Now it seems there may be another rethink going on.
Those always-shifting expectations will continue to create something of an unstable environment but this uncertainty won’t last forever. Eventually the Fed’s timetable will become clear and longer term investors simply need to ride out this period of ambiguity and let the institutional equity traders, hedge funds and day traders be the ones who lose sleep worrying about the precise timing of Fed interest rate policy.
The medium- and longer-term outlook for the economy and stocks remains largely positive as things stand. We shouldn’t get too wrapped up in the interest rate cut psychodrama. The precise timing of such cuts isn’t going to bring this rally to an end. But a meaningfully slowing economy or Fed rate hikes could. That’s what we need to watch for.
It’s important to separate the signals from the noise.
OTHER NEWS ..
A Reckoning .. Many pre-COVID-era homebuyers are about to see their cost of home ownership skyrocket. They are among the more than 1.7 million owners of homes bought since 2019 with an adjustable-rate mortgage. These loans average about $1 million to finance more expensive properties (or regular properties in expensive areas) and are set at a “teaser” rate lower than the prevailing 30-year rate for the first few years, but after that they adjust once or twice a year based on current borrowing costs.
About 330k of these buyers are now coming out of their fixed period and interest rates have of course soared to a two-decade high since their purchase. Another 100k of them are facing the same fate within the next year. Although a cap system on rate increases can sometimes take the edge off things, there are plenty of homeowners who could face an overnight increase in their monthly mortgage payments of 25%-40% or more. And that’s before even before taking into account increasing property taxes and homeowners insurance premiums, both of which are also spiraling significantly higher in many cases.
Plan B Destinations .. Travelers are increasingly opting to skip Europe’s most-visited cities and beachside venues in favor of less-frequented destinations for summer vacations this year. Fresh data shared with Bloomberg by Chase Travel shows that the cities with the biggest year-on-year tourism increases this summer are the off-the-beaten-track destinations of Brussels, Munich, Zurich and Warsaw, although the most-booked cities in Europe are still London, Paris and Rome.
The shifting emphasis toward secondary cities largely reflects ballooning prices of everything in the traditional big city destinations and record heat in often air conditioning-free Mediterranean literal hotspots.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Young investors in their 20s and 30s may not even recall a time when the U.S. didn’t dominate global markets .. but they should think twice about abandoning international markets.”
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Still a few Q2 earnings reports left: Crowdstrike, Bath & Body Works, Hewlett Packard, Lululemon, DocuSign, Campbell Soup and J.M. Smucker.
It’s jobs week with the Jobs Report on Friday. The consensus estimate is for growth of about 183k payrolls in April, which would be a small increase from March. Before that, we have the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) which is forecast to show about 8.4 million job openings, 100k lower than a month prior.
In contrast with an on-hold Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank is widely expected to lower its benchmark interest rate target on Thursday. A quarter-point cut would take it down to 3.75%.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - up 3.0% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) - down 1.5% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price was unchanged last week, is up 11.1% so far this year and ended the week 0.8% below its all-time record high (05/17/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 0.4% last week, is up 2.5% so far this year and ended the week 15.2% below its all-time record high (11/08/2021).
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It was unchanged last week, is up 3.2% so far this year and is up 16.2% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.94%, one month ago: 7.17%, one year ago: 6.79%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 1% probability (1% a week ago)
No .. 99% probability (99% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 14% probability (10% a week ago)
No .. 86% probability (90% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 5.125% (implying one rate cut), one month ago: 5.125% (implying one rate cut)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 50%, one month ago: 39%, one year ago: 29%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 71%, one month ago: 69%, one year ago: 38%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 39% (47% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 34% (27% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 27% (26% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 12 (Bullish by 21 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.10%, one month ago: 3.18%, one year ago: 4.69%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.48%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.55%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.47% to 0.37%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Last week’s narrative was dominated by Nvidia’s earnings, which ended up being a splendid story. Markets in general, however, were flattish for the week, as investors seemed to lurch from one side of the canoe to the other, suddenly concerned again that interest rate cuts could be further away and less frequent than previously thought.
The most popular futures market-driven scenario now sees no interest rate cut until December, so only one reduction this year. For context, at the beginning of last week, expectations were around 80% for a first cut in September and two reductions for the year.
The week started with the geopolitical temperature elevated by the death of Iranian president Raisi and the application for an arrest warrant for war crimes for Netanyahu among others which pushed up the prices of oil and so-called “safe havens” like gold early on Monday, but the stock market continued to head steadily upward with more new record highs, especially for any index that included “the most important stock on planet Earth” , Nvidia (NVDA) as investors piled into the AI giant’s stock in anticipation of the earnings report later in the week. Another big index component, Microsoft (MSFT), impressed Wall Street with the announcement of some new AI-powered additions to its PC product line.
Stocks drifted slightly higher again on a rather dreary Tuesday which saw more all-time record highs for the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ, driven mainly by the fact that .. well, there was no real reason not to. Investors still couldn’t get enough of NVDA which touched its own new all-time high ahead of the release of its eagerly-awaited earnings report after the close the next day.
While breathlessly waiting for that report during the session on Wednesday, traders tried to keep themselves occupied by poring over a very disappointing pre-market earnings report from Target (TGT) and the minutes from the most recent Fed interest rate-setting meeting that seemed to show most committee members coalescing around the idea of higher-for-longer interest rates with very little sign of any dissent. Stock prices floated lower in response.
When we finally got to see Nvidia’s results on Wednesday evening, we received an emphatic answer to the question as to whether spending on AI computing remains strong. Q2 revenue was $27 billion, up 262% from a year earlier. Earnings were a staggering 461% higher than a year prior. Gross margins were massive at 79%. Sales forecasts and outlook were sensationally bullish. This all trashed even the highly-elevated market forecasts.
Oh, and the firm announced a 10-for-1 stock split. As one analyst put it, "It's Nvidia's world. Everyone else is just paying rent.”
NVDA surged more than 10% at the open on Thursday, but was very much the outlier for the session as the rest of the market revisited some fairly bleak retail earnings reports/outlooks and the somewhat rate-cut-unfriendly tone of the Fed minutes from the day before, emphasized by further statements during the day from Fed officials, once again sticking to the party line that it would not be wise for them to cut rates until they had a solid degree of confidence that inflation appeared to be under control. The implication being that, at this exact moment in time, they lack that confidence.
The indexes all moved sharply lower on Thursday as prices seemed to fall into an “air-pocket” created by the rapid resumption of price-chasing by investors since the beginning of May, with the S&P 500 falling back below 5300.
Most of Thursday’s damage was, however, repaired on what turned out to be an ultra-low volume but pretty cheery Friday ahead of a long weekend, mostly driven by gains in Big Tech (including, you guessed it, NVDA yet again).
It’s not that any events on Wednesday and Thursday were definitively market-negative. They weren’t. It’s just that investors once again got too giddy in their expectations and some of last week’s non-Nvidia-related developments simply served to partially correct that too-rosy view (see my “canoe” analogy in the opening paragraph).
Like it or not, the Fed is very much in a higher-for-longer interest rate mode. “Longer” likely means a few months but that’ll depend on the economic data. If data is too strong, “longer” may well mean until December of this year, or maybe even beyond then. What “longer” definitely does not mean is, for example, a July cut instead of a June one.
The only way the Fed cuts interest rates before September is if growth utterly collapses and if that happens, stocks will be on such a serious downward march already that something as trivial as a rate cut or two won’t be enough to rescue the situation.
We should not be surprised if the market’s recent wobbles continue for a while longer as investors start to talk themselves into yet another new interest rate paradigm. But, that’s likely a temporary condition and nothing last week materially and negatively altered the largely favorable intermediate term outlook for stocks.
OTHER NEWS ..
????? .. Half of Americans think that the U.S. stock market has fallen this year, according to a major poll published by Guardian/Harris last week and there are a number of other quite alarming economic and financial knowledge gaps among the group of people who are about to decide who becomes the most powerful individual on the planet.
According to the poll results;
49% of Americans falsely believe the S&P 500 index is down for the year. In reality, it’s up over 11% so far in 2024, after rising about 24% in 2023.
72% of Americans falsely believe that the rate of inflation in the U.S. is increasing. In fact, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), it is now two years deep into a process of falling sharply from a peak of 9.1% in June 2022 and has been fluctuating between 3% and 4% for the last year, moving lower to a reading of 3.4% earlier this month.
49% of Americans falsely believe that the rate of unemployment, which has been below 4% for the last two-and-a-half years according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is at a 50-year high, in spite of the fact that it’s actually at a 50-year low.
56% of Americans falsely believe that the U.S. is currently experiencing a recession, even though the broadest measure of the economy, quarterly Gross Domestic Product (GDP), has grown for eleven of the last thirteen quarters since the dark days of early COVID back in 2020 and grown solidly every single quarter uninterrupted for the last two years.
These high levels of apparent ignorance of what is actually happening are perhaps at least partly explained by the rather disturbing finding from the same poll that over 60% of Americans distrust what they are told in official government economic data releases.
Where On Earth? .. Oxford Economics last week released its inaugural Global Cities Index, which it claims is the most comprehensive evaluation of the world’s largest urban areas. The index was compiled using five broad categories - economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance - with higher weightings placed on economic factors such as GDP and employment growth.
.. and the winners of the best places to live in 2024 are (in order of the overall scores):
New York
London
San Jose
Tokyo
Paris
Seattle
Los Angeles
San Francisco
Melbourne
Zurich
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Biden or Trump? Based on history, the stock market won’t care.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday for Memorial Day. One day settlement for U.S. securities transactions goes into effect on Tuesday when markets reopen. Expect a few teething problems.
Just a few laggards left to report this week for Q2 2024 such as Costco, Dell, Best Buy, Gap, HP Inc., Dollar General, Agilent and Ulta Beauty.
The economic-data highlight of the week will be Friday's Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index for April that the Fed relies on to measure inflation. The consensus estimate is for a year-on-year inflation rate of 2.7%, unchanged from the previous month.
Before that, we’ll get to see the second updated estimate (of three) for Q1 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on Thursday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) for the third week in a row - up 1.7% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 3.7% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price was unchanged last week, is up 11.4% so far this year and ended the week 0.4% below its all-time record high (05/21/2024).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 1.3% last week, is up 2.4% so far this year and ended the week 15.3% below its all-time record high (11/08/2021).
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It was up 0.2% last week, is up 3.3% so far this year and is up 16.6% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 7.02%, one month ago: 7.17%, one year ago: 6.57%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 1% probability (9% a week ago)
No .. 99% probability (91% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 10% probability (30% a week ago)
No .. 90% probability (70% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts), one month ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 64%, one month ago: 45%, one year ago: 31%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 79%, one month ago: 73%, one year ago: 40%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 47% (41% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 27% (36% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 26% (23% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 21 (Bullish by 18 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.08%, one month ago: 3.19%, one year ago: 4.68%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.56%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.46%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.41% to 0.47%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless or until an executed Client Engagement Agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It was a fourth straight week of higher stock prices with markets in a sweet spot right now as recent data has shown that growth is slowing but still positive, corporate earnings and outlooks are proving to be very strong and disinflation may have slowed, but it has not stalled.
This is also a market that once again seems to be happy talking itself into the idea that the Fed is going to cut interest rates in the not-too-distant future (a first cut in September and then another one sometime before year-end is currently the futures market’s best guess). Fed officials are sticking to the script, however, continuing to hammer home the higher-for-longer mantra in their speaking engagements last week.
Even as Wednesday’s release of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation loomed into view on Monday, there was not a lot of enthusiasm on the part of traders to take a strong view one way or another ahead of the numbers and the outcome was a fifth consecutive trading day of barely any movement in the major indexes, but with the S&P 500 still managing to hold above the important 5200 level. Beneath the index level, the news of the day was dominated by a resurgence of meme stock mania (see OTHER NEWS below).
Tuesday morning’s starter to the main course that was the following day’s CPI, was the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced in April by manufacturers which came in hotter than expected, rising +0.5% for the month and +2.2% for the year. However, the prior month’s number was revised down to a very chilly -0.1% and that seemed to balance things out as far as Wall Street was concerned. The net effect ended up being positive for stocks, with a late rally carrying the indexes higher, albeit still within a pretty tight range.
When CPI came out pre-market on Wednesday, we learned that the annualized headline inflation rate ticked slightly lower to +3.4%, the first time it has cooled this year. The important annual Core inflation rate (ex-food and energy) came in at +3.6%. All of this was very much in the same ZIP code as expectations.
Also released on Wednesday were the latest Retail Sales figures that were unexpectedly flat in April along with a slight downward revision to March, indicating that consumer spending was beginning to lose some momentum. This was viewed as a nice addition to the CPI-generated narrative of potentially cooling retail price increases and a possible acceleration of the timeline for interest rate cuts from the Fed.
Markets breathed a collective sigh of relief at the lack of an unpleasant inflation upside surprise and the welcome signs of still-intact disinflation, pushing stocks higher at the open and it only got better from there. We reached new all-time closing highs for the S&P 500 (for the 23rd time so far this year but the first time since March), the NASDAQ (for the eighth time so far this year) and even the stupid Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) which got to within spitting distance of the 40,000 level for the first time and is now double what it was less than eight years ago, even without Nvidia, Meta/Facebook and Alphabet/Google being in the index.
Stock markets returned to snooze mode on Thursday, following a series of little twists and turns and closed slightly lower as traders digested the week’s gains. This was despite a very healthy earnings report driven by international and e-commerce strength from the bellwether stock, Walmart (WMT), pushing the stock price up to its highest level ever.
Another generally quiet one for stocks on Friday too, although by the closing bell, the S&P 500 index had closed above 5300 for the first time and we also saw the first-ever close above 40,000 for the DJIA, thanks to a very positive literally final minute of the session, which brought yet another solid Wall Street week to an end.
These new highs for most of the indexes have just eclipsed levels last seen in March as the 5.5% “correction” in stocks came to an end in the space of about a month, so what has happened since then?
The first Fed rate cut is now not expected until September, not June (as it was in March).
The Fed is now only expected to cut once or twice, not four or five times (as it was in March).
The unemployment rate has now risen to 3.9%, tying the highest level in months.
CPI inflation for last month is now at 3.4% annualized, up from 3.1% in March’s reading for February.
Earnings expectations remain pretty much unchanged.
Not one of these factors is “better” now than it was in March, indeed some of them are noticeably “worse”. So, why are stocks higher today than they were in late March?
The answer lies in all the happy talk. Investors have convinced themselves that we are in the midst of a near stock-perfect Goldilocks environmentthat’s still characterized by 1) stable growth and earnings, 2) falling inflation, 3) upcoming Fed rate cuts and 4) AI enthusiasm. While all four of those aspects of this market are probably in a worse state today than they were in March, they’re not “worse enough” to force these investors to think they aren’t still all happening. Put differently, the environment may not be as good as it was in March, but it’s still good enough to push stocks higher.
The problem, as JP Morgan‘s Jamie Dimon pointed out last week, is what happens to markets when it becomes clear that one or more of those four factors is no longer in place, because Wall Street seems to have not really baked in that possibility in the course of an ongoing seven-month rally in stock prices.
OTHER NEWS .. MEME STOCK EDITION
Here We Go Again? .. Shares of GameStop (GME) skyrocketed over 100% in value in just the first 30 minutes of trading on Monday morning, ending the day on 30X its normal trading volume, after Keith Gill, the key driver of the meme stock craze of 2021, known by his online persona of “Roaring Kitty” and recently portrayed by Paul Dano in the enjoyable if somewhat factually incomplete movie, “Dumb Money”, apparently posted a cryptic tweet for the first time after basically having disappeared online almost three years ago. I say “apparently” because as the week wore on, doubts began to emerge out there as to whether it was actually him doing the tweeting, had he sold his account name or perhaps got hacked?
The tweet raised speculation that retail investors may again run up shares of GameStop and some of the other members of the old Meme Team like AMC Entertainment (AMC) and Hertz (HTZ), which also soared that day for no rational reason. The mania continued into Tuesday with more big price spikes - but reality suddenly set in on Wednesday when prices corrected back down and hard, wiping out a large portion of the gains in the first few minutes of trading.
The stock market continued to punch any meme stock day traders who had decided on Tuesday to hop on the bandwagon in the face on Thursday and Friday sending their stock prices cascading lower. GME ended Friday’s session more than 54% below where it had been just 72 hours earlier to a price representing just a 16% increase on the week, having been up as much as 180% at one point. There’s not a lot of “Diamond Hands” HODLing of the stock happening here.
These meme stock movements make for fun stories and amusing investor profiles for financial journalists but from an actual market standpoint, the price action just hints at a lingering complacency amongst investors. As was pointed out on many occasions last week, one wordless post on X/Twitter shouldn’t increase a company’s market capitalization by over $4 billion in a matter of minutes and, frankly, the outlook for GameStop’s business is particularly bleak right now (it has a $10 billion market cap and in the last year only reported $6.7 million in net income. It’s price to earnings multiple got to more than 1,000X last week, compared to the stock market’s 21X - obviously completely unsustainable).
This nonsense happens in frothy markets when there’s money sloshing around, like there was in post-stimulus-check, low-interest-rate America in 2021 when people were starved of ways of entertaining themselves. Now we are coming off a stock market rally dating back to the lows recorded in October of last year and potential interest cuts coming up.
But sequels rarely match the original and this little attempt at a redux may possibly even be over already. We shall see. But just like last time (you can read this book to learn what actually happened), I’m pretty confident that most of the YOLO crowd will eventually lose their shirts once again.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
A crash course in what have sometimes been called; “the four most dangerous words in investing” .. This Time It’s Different. Is it really?
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Earnings season is slowing down but there are still some notable results due from tech leaders and retailers this week such as Target, Zoom Video, Intuit, Lowe’s, AutoZone, TJX, Snowflake, Workday and Ross Stores. But the Big Daddy will be Nvidia, whose earnings report and outlook come out on Wednesday. Wall Street will be hanging on every single word.
Not much in the way of economic data highlights, although Wednesday will see the release of the Federal Reserve minutes from the last meeting of its interest rate setting committee back on May 1st.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) for the second week in a row - up 2.8% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Industrials (two biggest holdings: Caterpillar, GE) - down 0.2% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.7% last week, is up 11.4% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record high
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 1.9% last week, is up 3.7% so far this year and ended the week 14.2% below its all-time record high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It was down 0.7% last week, is up 3.1% so far this year and is up 15.9% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 7.09%, one month ago: 7.10%, one year ago: 6.39%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 9% probability (3% a week ago)
No .. 91% probability (97% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 30% probability (25% a week ago)
No .. 70% probability (75% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 5.125% (implying one rate cut), one month ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 57%, one month ago: 28%, one year ago: 47%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 77%, one month ago: 66%, one year ago: 45%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 41% (41% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 36% (35% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 23% (24% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 18 (Bullish by 17 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.14%, one month ago: 3.42%, one year ago: 4.79%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.50%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.42%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.37% to 0.41%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Another positive week for stocks mostly came about exclusively because of last Monday’s favorable price action. The indexes then barely moved from Tuesday through Friday on a lack of impactful economic data releases and fewer interesting earnings reports.
Continued improving optimism about the timing and frequency of Fed interest rate cuts in the afterglow of the previous Friday’s Goldilocks Jobs Report drove stocks solidly higher on Monday. This capped the S&P 500’s best three-day run of the year so far and took the index back above its technically-important 50-day moving average.
The positive momentum initially persisted into Tuesday,sending the S&P 500 spiking briefly above 5200 for the first time in a month, but it began to tail off as the session wore on - reflecting some mixed minor earnings reports and rising geopolitical tension in Gaza and Ukraine. The major stock indexes ended up virtually unchanged on the day.
The rally ran out of steamin a snoozer of a session on Wednesday with stock prices hardly budging all day. With Q1 2024 earnings season now past its peak and no major economic data until the Consumer Price Index (CPI) a week away, markets were lacking any real mood-swinging catalysts apart from the release of some very low-level economic data, potential geopolitical developments (which, by their very nature, tend to rarely be market-positive) and maybe some chattering Fed officials throwing their two cents into the interest rate cut timing debate.
On Thursday morning, the Bank of England fell in step with the Fed and the European Central Bank, announcing no change to local interest rates. Weekly U.S. unemployment claims data showed a meaningful increase, bolstering interest rate cut hopes. Once again, though, there was still no real spark in stock markets one way or another, although we saw a bit more green on the screen than we had the day before, with the S&P 500 able to hold above the 5200 level this time.
A fourth consecutive day of virtually no change in stock prices on Friday saw a big fall in the highly-dodgy Consumer Sentiment Survey reading which basically asks Joe Public how he’s feeling about things and what his considered expectations are about the economic growth trajectory and his guesses about the future rate of retail inflation over various upcoming future time horizons.
Inasmuch as a big influence on the responses to this survey could very well be TikTok videos (see ARTICLE OF THE WEEK below), boneheaded Facebook posts and partisan political nonsense, its value as a meaningful data point is, to say the least, highly questionable and the market mostly treated it with the contempt and disrespect that it deserves.
I have been asked a lot recently about the relationship between inflation and interest rates and how and why this affects the outlook for stocks and I want to give a quick explanation here, on the eve of the latest inflation data, of how to think about it. It’s actually all about the straightforward math surrounding real interest rates.
The real interest rate is simply the Fed Funds rate (set by the central bank at its periodic meetings) minus the rate of retail inflation. So that is currently 5.375% - 3.50% = 1.875%. Real interest rates have obviously been mostly climbing as the inflation variable has been steadily falling and nothing has happened on the Fed Funds rate for quite a while. However, this trend has been leveling off somewhat lately as inflation is kind of flatlining and there have been no changes to the Fed Funds rate for nine months now. It is what happens next to real interest rates that will determine the timing and extent of the future Fed rate cuts and thereby the likely prospects for the U.S. stock market.
If inflation were to resume its rapid decline, then real rates will obviously rise and the risk of a serious economic slowdown or even a hard landing will increase and potentially negatively impact company earnings and thereby stock prices. In this circumstance, the Fed will need to quickly (and maybe severely) cut interest rates to try and avoid this outcome. Note that I say that it will “need to” rather than it will “want to”.
As long as these cuts have the desired effect of avoiding a recession, then a soft landing will have occurred and the stock market will be very happy indeed and likely charge higher, but if the Fed is too late or too timid with its cuts and fails to stop the damaging effects of higher real interest rates on potential earnings, then stocks could have a very long way to fall since this scenario is not even close to having been priced in to current levels. This is the needle that the Fed has to carefully thread.
If the rate of inflation remains stubbornly static or even shows signs of shifting higher again, then real rates will obviously remain unchanged or even begin to fall a bit. In those circumstances, there will be zero inclination on the part of the Fed to make any rate cuts at all since reducing interest rates under these circumstances will only shrink the downward pressure on inflation and risk setting up a doom loop of high inflation and higher-but-uncuttable interest rates which will obviously not please the stock market one little bit.
We’ll learn more this week.
OTHER NEWS ..
Coming Up: A Very Risky Time? .. Goldman Sachs analysts issued a note last week saying that they believe investors may be underpricing U.S. election risk. The way things are looking, we are unlikely to have a fully settled outcome immediately after polling day in November, with recounts and political posturing possibly heading to the courts with a non-trivial risk of political violence around the election and afterwards.
In 23 states (including the swing states of Arizona, Michigan and Pennsylvania), provisions exist for automatic or mandatory recounts if the margin between the two candidates is within certain parameters, typically 0.5%. Meanwhile, 41 states will permit the losing candidate to petition for a recount if he says he believes that there was fraud or some kind of mistake in the return of votes. Given the elevated level of rhetoric and the sheer number of conspiracy theory believers in the country right now to play to, this provision is likely to be very heavily leaned on by the loser candidate.
The stock market is going to hate all this and increased volatility is a certainty if things pan out as many fear they will.
Very Bad To Much Worse ..Things just keep getting worse for Boeing. Now the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is scrutinizing statements made by the embattled planemaker about its safety practices following a near-tragic January accident aboard one of its 737 Max 9 planes earlier this year.
The SEC investigation is focused on comments by the company and its executives that may have misled investors. The probe, which is examining statements before and after a panel blew off during an Alaska Airlines flight on January 5th, adds to an ever-growing monster pile of legal problems facing Boeing, whose stock has lost about one third of its value in 2024.
Sinking Deeper .. The share of U.S. home mortgages considered seriously underwater (defined as where the loan balance is at least 25% more than the market value) ticked up to roughly one in 37 homes last quarter, according to real estate data firm ATTOM. Mortgages generally become seriously underwater when someone overpays for a home or when it is purchased with such a small downpayment that there is no sufficient buffer if the property falls in value.
The proportionof underwater homes is very much higher in southern states with the homeowners in the worst shape living in Kentucky, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Florida and Louisiana.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
I am sure I don’t need to tell any of the savvy readers of this weekly report not to ever take any financial advice from any of the absurd “Finfluencers” on the cess-pool that is Tik-Tok, but just in case you know anyone who may be thinking about it, here is Barry Ritholtz’s take (complete with examples) of the ignorant and dangerous financial st that pollutes the platform.
My personal favorite can’t-miss genius strategy to “make unlimited money” is here. What could possibly go wrong?
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This will be big week of important economic data, highlighted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation, the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers and U.S. Retail Sales.
The April PPI number will be published on Tuesday and then the all-important April CPI will come out on Wednesday morning before stock markets open. The consensus estimate for headline CPI is for a 3.4% year-over-year increase, which would be a touch lower than in March. The important Core CPI, which excludes food and energy components, is expected to rise 3.6% annualized, also a bit lower than the month before.
The Retail Sales data for April also comes out on Wednesday and the Leading Economic Index is released on Friday.
Highlights on the earnings calendar this week will include results from Walmart, Home Depot, Cisco, AMD, Alibaba and Deere.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: Next Era Energy, Southern Co.) for the second week in a row - up 4.1% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 0.1% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from among the largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.7% last week, is up 9.6% so far this year and ended the week 0.5% below its all-time record closing high (03/27/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a group made up from among 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 1.0% last week, is up 1.8% so far this year and ended the week 15.8% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It was up 0.2% last week, is up 3.9% so far this year and is up 16.7% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 7.22%, one month ago: 6.88%, one year ago: 6.35%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 3% probability (8% a week ago)
No .. 97% probability (92% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 25% probability (37% a week ago)
No .. 75% probability (63% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts), one month ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 42%, one month ago: 57%, one year ago: 49%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 72%, one month ago: 74%, one year ago: 47%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the S&P 500 index stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 41% (39% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 35% (29% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 24% (32% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 17 (Bullish by 7 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.16%, one month ago: 3.10%, one year ago: 4.78%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.50%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.31% to 0.37%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Last week saw a pretty dismal month of April finally come to an end with most indexes suffering a >4% loss for the month, the first monthly setback of the year. But stocks enjoyed a second consecutive week of higher prices after a wild ride that navigated some big earnings reports, a Fed interest rate decision meeting and a Jobs Report.
The bulls remained in the driver's seat from the previous week on Monday as the recently-shaky stock prices of Apple and Tesla continued their recent recoveries and helped drag all the indexes modestly higher on the day, taking the S&P 500 to its highest level for a couple of weeks, ahead of a tsunami of Q1 earnings reports.
There was a tangible change of mood however on Tuesday as stocks seemed absolutely determined to move lower ahead of Fed chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference the next day which suddenly had the feel of a possible big downside catalyst. Any excuse would do and when the normally-overlooked data point of the Employment Cost Index came in a tad hotter than expected and the very flawed statistic of Consumer Confidence came in colder, this was all that was needed to trigger a big spike in Treasury yields and a major selloff in stocks thatsent the indexes plunging.
Before markets opened on Wednesday, Amazon came out with a very robust earnings report, but Starbucks and CVS disappointed and their respective stock prices all responded accordingly. The market in general, however, basically did nothing all morning, holding its collective breath ahead of hearing from Powell and taking a largely as-expected Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) report in its stride.
There was of course no change made to the Fed Funds interest rate, everyone knew that was going to be the case. The press conference was interesting though, as Powell skillfully threaded the needle, remaining absolutely on message that there will be interest rate cuts coming at some point, it’s just a matter of when. While acknowledging that recent data had shown inflation stickiness to be a real thing and that this was hampering the Fed’s ability to cut interest rates right now, he scornfully laughed off the idea that the next move would be to raise rates.
Stocks and bonds initially lapped this all up and indexes exploded higher and bond yields fell hard as soon as Powell appeared to rule out a rate increase, with the S&P 500 jumping 1.2% in a matter of minutes. But stock prices then quickly reversed back lower to finish a smidge down on the day after seeming to recalibrate his message as actually having been; ok, we aren't about to raise interest rates, but we are still a long way from having enough confidence that inflation is under control to lower them anytime soon.
Wall Street’s mood swung back to positive on Thursday and stocks rose nicely with the rate hike boogeyman apparently dead. But there was a little caution in the air as there were still plenty of wildcards to be negotiated before the relative safety of the weekend, with earnings from Apple (AAPL) after the bell and a big Jobs Report the next day.
The Apple earnings report, the final one this season from the big guns, showed continued sales declines around the world and ongoing challenging conditions in China, but nothing was as bad as had been feared. This saw the stock price shoot higher in the after-market, helped by the announcement of a dividend increase and the biggest stock buyback in history.
Pre-market on Friday, we learned from the Jobs Report that payrolls rose 175k in April, somewhat below expectations but still very solid. The unemployment rate was 3.9%, a fraction above both estimates and the previous month and, importantly for inflation optimism, wage growth rose only 0.2% month-to-month, below the 0.3% prediction.
If Wall Street could have created a perfect jobs report in a laboratory, it would have looked just like this. Stocks screamed higher and Treasury yields plummeted, boosted by both the Apple data from the night before and the impeccable Jobs Report before taking something of a cold shower around lunchtime, but all the indexes still closed solidly higher on the day and back into the green for the week. Tuesday’s misery and pessimism suddenly seemed a million miles away, emphasizing the exhausting data-addicted rollercoaster nature of the markets right now.
The interest rate futures market swiftly pulled forward the most likely month for the first rate cut to September from December, with the probability of a second cut in 2024 now priced at about 50/50.
Wall Street seems unable to stay in the middle right now when it comes Fed expectations. It seems to constantly gyrate from the glass is completely full (six or seven interest rate cuts in 2024) to there’s nothing left in the glass at all (the next move is an interest rate increase) spending very little time anywhere in between and had convinced itself over the past couple of weeks that Powell could put rate hikes back on the table at this meeting, only to see him reject the idea out of hand.
OTHER NEWS ..
Finally! .. The term “Magnificent Seven” has been finally retired by analysts and the financial media as there’s overdue acceptance that Telsa (TSLA) ain’t exactly magnificent since, despite a recent rebound, over a third of the company’s value has evaporated just in 2024. This has resulted in Tesla’s rank by market capitalization now falling to #12.
So, for the moment, the elite group of largest U.S. companies is now being referred to as “The Big Six.” (MSFT, AAPL, GOOGL, AMZN, NVDA and META) Unlike the Mag-7, which was being dragged down by TSLA’s dismal performance, the Big Six are generally in well-defined multi-year uptrends.
Hero To (Almost) Zero .. Peloton (PTON), the poster child of a pandemic 2021 darling that then became a disastrous POS stock, fell to new all-time lows last week as a calamitous earnings report showed deepening losses, collapsing revenue and the number of both equipment purchasers and subscribers falling by the tens of thousands. The company announced the departure if its CEO, Barry McCarthy and a fifth round of layoffs, this time slashing 15% of the remaining global work force. The stock price has fallen 98.4% from its peak in July 2021.
Another One Bites The Dust .. Billionaire Changpeng Zhao (CZ to his crypto buddies and the formerly-fawning media), founder of the world’s biggest crypto exchange, Binance, was sentenced to four months in prison, a significantly lighter punishment than requested by prosecutors who hoped to send a message about rampant crime in the crypto industry. His incarceration means that both of the former top dogs of crypto world (CZ and SBF) are currently felons behind bars on fraud and other criminal convictions.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
While there’ll still be plenty of earnings reports to feast on this week, things will be quieter on the economic data front.
Earnings releases will include Disney, Uber, AirBnb, BP, Occidental Petroleum, BioNTech, Warner Bros., Anheuser-Busch, Palantir Technologies, Tyson Foods, Ferrari, Honda, Roblox, Wynn Resorts and NRG Energy.
Economic data to watch includes the Federal Reserve's Consumer Credit Data and the University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Index
The Bank of England will announce a monetary-policy decision this week and is widely expected to keep its target interest rate unchanged.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Got money to spend? How to best do that.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: Next Era Energy, Southern Co.) - up 3.8% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 3.3% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 0.8% last week, is up 7.6% so far this year and ended the week 2.3% below its all-time record closing high (03/27/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 2.0% last week, is up 0.6% so far this year and ended the week 16.8% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It was down 0.6% last week, is up 3.7% so far this year and is up 15.5% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 7.17%, one month ago: 6.82%, one year ago: 6.39%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 8% probability (11% a week ago)
No .. 92% probability (89% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting on July 31st?
Yes .. 37% probability (31% a week ago)
No .. 63% probability (69% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 5.125% (implying one rate cut), one month ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 45%, one month ago: 72%, one year ago: 45%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 71%, one month ago: 77%, one year ago: 45%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 39% (32% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 29% (34% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 32% (34% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 7 (Bearish by 2 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.24%, one month ago: 3.12%, one year ago: 4.73%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.48%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.29% to 0.31%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The Federal Reserve remains in a holding pattern, circling the airport until a safe runway opens up on which to land the plane, following an absolute deluge of earnings reports and important economic data last week. Stagflation, anyone? Use of this rather scary term that is reminiscent of a 1970s stock slump is probably premature at this point, but the chances of a “worst of both worlds” outcome of simultaneous stubbornly high inflation and rapidly slowing economic growth do appear to have increased a little over the last few weeks.
In terms of last week’s earnings, the market took Meta/Facebook and a loaded pistol behind the woodshed, but lavished confetti and a lot of love on the likes of Microsoft, Alphabet/Google and even Tesla, which was enough to help carry the indexes higher for the first week in four.
Following a quiet weekend on the newswires and a technically very oversold condition, the six-day losing streak for stocks finally came to an end on Monday with an impressive rebound led by NASDAQ tech and Small Caps ahead of a slew of earnings reports from a number of big-time names, to recover some of the ground lost from the previous week’s miserable performance. This added strength to the idea that a 5% decline from recent highs might be viewed as simply a retreat from unsustainably over-optimistic expectations thereby removing excess froth, rather than a sudden and more fundamental negative turn. Later in this report, I’ll discuss what might change this view.
The feel-good vibes continued into Tuesday, as some stellar earnings reports came out, accelerating the recovery in stock prices, again powered primarily by NASDAQ tech and Small Caps.
Predictably however, 2024’s biggest POS stock, Tesla (TSLA), bucked the earnings trend after-hours on Tuesday with a disastrous report, showing that profits collapsed, the cash-burn rate rocketed, sales missed expectations and margins shrank in a marketplace that seems to be falling out of love with the company’s product. However, a hefty 43% decline in the stock price since January has a lot of calamitous news already baked in and the stock actually rallied hard on the announcement that the firm was being forced to bring forward the launch of some new, cheaper vehicles and that is working on some form of licensing agreement for its self-driving technology with a “major automaker”.
The two-day rally cooled off on Wednesday, with stocks taking a breather and closing unchanged ahead of Meta/Facebook (META) taking the baton with its report after the closing bell. Meta’s report was kind of the mirror image of Tesla’s. It mildly beat expectations on revenue and doubled its profits from a year ago, but upcoming scenarios (like massive imminent capital expenditure resulting from yet another apparent pivot towards the latest shiny object - this time from the metaverse to AI) worried Wall Street and the stock got pounded hard in after-hours trading.
Thursday morning’s estimate for Gross Domestic Product (GDP) disappointed, showing that the U.S. economy likely grew at an annualized rate of 1.6% in Q1 2024, well below the 2.4% expectation and a significant slowdown on its recent pace.
Traders extrapolated some of Thursday’s data into expectations for the next day’s inflation report and didn’t like what they saw. Market interest rates spiraled higher again, partly driven by the futures-driven expectation of when the first interest rate cut is most likely to be now being pushed out to December. The annihilation of Meta/Facebook’s stock price continued and the indexes were rattled and got beaten up pretty badly.
Two of Meta/Facebook’s Magnificent Seven cohorts, Microsoft (MSFT) and Alphabet/Google (GOOGL) fared much better when their earnings releases hit the markets after the closing bell. Pretty much everything to do with Microsoft looked great and handily beat expectations, especially in the cloud computing arena. Alphabet/Google’s results were so impressive that the firm was even able to announce its first-ever dividend and also a stock buyback. Again, cloud computing was at the forefront of the good news.
On Friday morning, we learned that the Federal Reserve’s go-to Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index measure of inflation remained zippy, increasing 0.3% from the prior month and 2.8% from a year ago, but all pretty much in line with expectations. This allowed Wall Street to properly celebrate the previous night’s earnings when the market opened and stocks enjoyed a jolly day to cap a nice week.
It’s important to understand that the rally from the October lows did not stall because things went suddenly “bad.” It happened because they aren’t as good as everyone was hoping they would be and those hopes were very, very optimistic. Given that, what is it that would turn this pullback into something more sustained and damaging?
Growth slows. If growth rolls over, we could be looking at stagflation. In stagflation, the S&P 500 could quite easily trade down to a level of 15X multiple of earnings. That implies a decline of over 1,000 points from here. Growth is the single most important influence on the economy and if it meaningfully slows, look out below. The key indicators to watch: new payrolls, unemployment rate (both coming out this week).
Rate hikes back on the table. The heavy lifting for the October-March rally was driven by markets assuming that rate hikes were over. If this turns out to not be true, it’ll create a major valuation reset and a give-back of the entire rally is not off the table. The key indicator to watch: futures market rate cut expectations (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL, shown below and every week in this report).
Oil price spikes. The conflicts in Russia/Ukraine and Israel/Hamas spreading regionally would guarantee this, but there are other possibilities including the disruption of global shipping and OPEC supply cuts. Rising oil would increase headline inflation and the optics and politics of high oil and higher inflation would likely eliminate any possibility of a rate cut. The key indicator to watch: WTI crude oil prices, especially a move towards or even beyond $100/barrel.
AI enthusiasm wanes. While AI enthusiasm hasn’t been the reason stocks have rallied, it has contributed to the magnitude of the gains and that’s why it matters. If doubt about the transformative power of AI starts to creep in, that will add downward pressure to prices in the tech sector which will gravely impact the major indexes, which are very tech-heavy. There’s no doubt that we are now entering the “show me” phase of AI, a phase that crypto for instance hasn’t managed to get out of for years. The key indicator to watch: Nvidia’s stock price (NVDA). It’s the darling of AI enthusiasm and the firm’s earnings on May 22nd will be watched closely.
The general macroeconomic set-up is still positive for stocks. However, we cannot lose sight of the fact that that can absolutely change and these are the four factors that we’ll be watching for any sign of that.
OTHER NEWS ..
Sector Takeaways .. What can the relative performances of particular sectors tell us about the stock market as a whole .. ?
The fact that both the Consumer Cyclical and Consumer Defensive sectors are both rated as underperforming emphasizes growing investor concerns about the outlook for the health of the consumer in 2024,
the strong underperform ratings on Real Estate and Utilities reiterate there are ongoing worries about a “higher-for-longer” Fed policy rate,
the outperformance rating of Energy underscores upside inflation risks, and
the neutral performance rating on Technology and Communication Services suggest the market leaders of 2023 are taking a breather here in Q2 2024.
No Shrimp On The Barbie For You, Elon .. An Australian court ordered X/Twitter to remove graphic videos of a brutal Sydney church murder and its associated promotion of Russian-generated, dangerous and false conspiracy nonsense. CEO Elon Musk pointedly refused to have anything taken down. Australian government officials, including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, have commendably been at the forefront of trying to finally hold social media companies and their billionaire owners to account for what they publish and promote and last week Musk was referred to as, among plenty of other things, an “out of touch, arrogant billionaire who thinks he is above the law and common decency” , a “bloke who’s chosen ego and violence over common sense” as well as, memorably, a “social media knob with no social conscience” .
In between getting rid of 10% of Tesla’s workforce, having to recall every single Cybertruck ever sold, endorsing conspiracy theories surrounding Trump’s fraud trial, lawyering up to make damn sure he squeezes every last penny of his disputed $50 billion+ Tesla pay package and ineptly seeking to interfere in Brazilian domestic constitutional politics, Musk somehow found time last week to push back online against his Australian critics, predictably playing his usual tiresome“free speech” card as an excuse for refusing to do anything to address online violence and harmful disinformation.
Continuing Lower .. U.S. births declined in 2023 to their lowest level in more than 40 years, continuing a two-decade trend of Americans having fewer children. Total births for the year fell 2% to 3.59 million, according to preliminary data released Thursday from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics.
Birth rates in the U.S. have been particularly stifled by specific factors like a lack of paid family leave, student loan debt and skyrocketing health costs.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week will be the busiest of Q1 2024 earnings season, as more than 150 S&P 500 companies are scheduled to publish their results, including Apple, Amazon, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, CVS, Qualcomm, Paramount, Advanced Micro Devices, Super Micro Computer, Etsy, Mastercard, ConocoPhillips, Moderna and Monster Beverage.
On Wednesday afternoon, the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decision-making committee is overwhelmingly expected to keep rates unchanged. As usual, however, Chairman Jerome Powell’s post-announcement press conference will be closely scrutinized for clues about future Fed actions.
The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) on Wednesday is expected to show 8.7 million job openings on the last business day of March.
Then there’s Jobs Report Friday. Consensus calls for a gain of 210k payrolls in April, which would be down from the 303k from the previous month. The unemployment rate is expected to remain unchanged at 3.8%.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“When a geopolitical risk arises, our natural tendency is to immediately become foreign policy experts, and also believe that we can confidently link complex .. political situations to financial market outcomes.” An investor checklist for dealing with geopolitical risk.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) - up 3.7% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Basic Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Sherwin-Williams) - up 0.5% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 2.8% last week, is up 7.5% so far this year and ended the week 2.9% below its all-time record closing high (03/27/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 2.7% last week, is down 1.2% so far this year and ended the week 18.2% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It was unchanged last week, is up 4.6% so far this year and is up 16.8% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 7.10%, one month ago: 6.79%, one year ago: 6.43%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 34%, one month ago: 73%, one year ago: 38%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 68%, one month ago: 77%, one year ago: 46%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 32% (38% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 34% (28% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 34% (34% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 2 (Bullish by 4 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 2% probability (4% a week ago)
No .. 98% probability (96% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 11% probability (17% a week ago)
No .. 89% probability (83% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 5.125% (implying one rate cut), one month ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.39%, one month ago: 3.15%, one year ago: 4.64%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.67%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.35% to 0.29%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Interest rate cuts are beginning to look like a mirage; the closer we seem to get to them the more they seem to recede into the distance. By the end of last week, the most likely Fed interest rate at the end of the year according to futures markets was 5.125% (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below). With Fed Funds currently sitting at 5.375%, this now implies just one solitary Fed rate cut of 0.25% between here and New Year’s Eve.
As a result, stocks fell for the third straight week and tech-heavy NASDAQ stocks in particular were brutalized, suffering their biggest weekly decline in 17 months. The so-called “Magnificent Seven” stocks lost a total of over $950 billion in market value last week.
The great stock market rally of 2023-2024 is showing signs of possibly unraveling under pressure from growing uncertainty surrounding interest rates, economic growth and corporate earnings as well as geopolitical concerns and even the first faint signs of nervousness about the domestic election campaign.
Iran’s largely impotent retaliatory strike on Israel over the preceding weekend didn’t really move the needle much as far as markets were concerned on Monday. Oil prices actually shifted a little lower and stocks began the day meandering around aimlessly before suffering an afternoon collapse led by Big Tech after a hot Retail Sales report sent market interest rates ripping even higher, with the 2-Year Treasury yield breaking up through 5% and the 10-Year reaching its highest level since mid-November.
Mixed economic data overnight from China added to the jitters on Tuesday morning. Also, Fed chairman Jerome Powell seems to have pivoted to a much more cautious stance since his last public pronouncements in March. He essentially said at a moderated Q&A session in Washington that, due to steadfast inflation during Q1, a Fed policy of higher-for-longer interest rates has now become not only a possibility, but in fact the most likely path forward.
Despite this potential double-whammy, alongside Iran vowing to retaliate against any future Israeli retaliation to last weekend’s Iranian retaliation to Israel’s recent deadly attack on an Iranian consulate inside Syria, stocks took a perhaps surprisingly sober view of things and hardly moved, although less surprising was that there was was no respite from ever-increasing market interest rates/falling bond prices.
Stocks made a half-hearted effort to rebound early on Wednesday but soon gave up and looked pretty exhausted as prices sank again in another down-day for most names, led by weakness in Big Tech in general and Nvidia in particular, as some of the day’s earnings reports disappointed and traders seemed to be replaying Powell’s comments over and over in their minds and becoming more and more uneasy each time.
Earning reports released on Thursday looked a lot rosier but once again, stocks failed to hold on to early gains in the face of continuously rising market interest rates, finishing essentially flat-to-a-bit-lower for the day.
Investors woke on Friday to the news that Israel had attacked Iran. Upon closer inspection, however, it appeared that that strike had been just about as ineffectual as Iran’s attempt on Israel at the weekend. After a brief spike, oil prices moved lower, indicating a lack of excessive concern on the part of markets which seemed to feel, perhaps ironically, that the chances of an escalation were lower after the attack than they were before it.
Rather than a panicked response to more bombs dropping in the Middle East, Friday resembled just a standard recent financial market trading day, which meant that traders turned their focus back onto concerns about higher for longer interest rates and some mixed earnings reports, which resulted in another plunge in stock prices, with the tech-heavy NASDAQ-100 in particular getting pummeled (AI market darlings Nvidia and Super Micro Computer were the two worst performers, falling 10% and 23% respectively in a matter of hours), capping the index’s worst week since November 2022.
This also represented a sixth straight day of losses for the S&P 500 index, the longest such streak of the year, shedding about 4% of its value during that time and sinking back down below the psychologically-important 5000 level that it first surpassed to a very loud fanfare back in early February.
When markets decline like this, investors get nervous, even if it’s after such a fantastic run as we’ve experienced over essentially the past 15 months. But based on facts, the only thing that’s really changed in this market recently is that actual events and data haven’t lived up to what were unrealistically positive expectations, which is something I will say I have been warning about for a while.
The stock market was priced for perfection at 5200 in the S&P 500 but it has been forcefully reminded that the environment is not perfect and stocks declined accordingly. Positively, this pullback to below 5000 may have started the process of re-setting expectations to something a bit more realistic.
At these levels, the S&P 500 is starting to more appropriately reflect the fact that:
1) the outlook isn’t as good as markets previously thought, but
2) is still broadly positive, because the following statements remain generally true as we speak: Growth is solid, inflation is still declining (slowly and jerkily, but it’s still happening), the next move on interest rates is still most likely to be a cut and AI enthusiasm broadly continues.
Until those four statements aren’t true, dips like this are likely to be relatively shallow and short-lived and investors will most likely be ultimately rewarded for holding their nerve.
OTHER NEWS ..
In The Dark .. Netflix was once the “N” in the group of dominant so-called “FAANG stocks”, which were ultimately replaced by the “Magnificent Seven”, an elite club that Netflix was not invited to join. Things have looked up lately for the streaming service, though and last week the company announced that it had added 9.33 million new subscribers in Q1 2024, crushing the consensus prediction of 5.1 million.
However, Netflix accompanied this spectacularly good news with the shock announcement that, going forward, it plans to stop providing quarterly membership data and average revenue generated per member. That stunned analysts on the earnings call, since these have always been the metrics that investors used to judge the company’s investment-worthiness.
Wall Street does not like the sense that it is being kept in the dark and the initial reaction to the blowout earnings report was to punish the stock which fell almost 7%.
Sinking .. Existing home sales in March posted their biggest monthly drop in more than a year, the National Association of Realtors said Thursday. The 4.3% decrease from February in a >7.0% mortgage rate environment was the largest percentage decline on a monthly basis since November 2022.
Didn’t get into Harvard, Princeton or Yale? .. Your next best option isn’t necessarily the most “prestigious” college that accepted you. Right now, high school seniors are deciding where to enroll in college next year, a question that’s taken on added urgency recently. The cost of tuition is soaring – currently a four-year degree could easily cost a family more than a quarter of a million dollars – and good jobs are becoming harder to come by for college grads.
Bloomberg News analyzed hundreds of US colleges to determine the 10-year Return On Investment (ROI) of attending each school and found that in many cases public universities offer better returns than many elite private colleges. Here’s what they came up with for every university.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Shorter term indicators continued breaking down last week. Recent observations of lackluster Demand and increasing Supply have given way to a corrective phase. Supply has gained momentum.
All three of the major technical gaps have now been filled as the index fell below the key 4,982 level on Friday. The Fear & Greed Index (see below) has collapsed from the mid 70s to the low 30s in a very short time, indicating that Fear has rapidly overtaken Greed as the primary emotion driving investor decision making.
Market breadth has also plunged with the percentage of S&P 500 stocks above their 50-day moving average tumbling from the 80s to the 40s.
Stocks have been trading well above fundamental fair value for months now, but the recent pullback has seen the S&P 500 favorably dip back towards more reasonable and rational valuation levels.
This week, we want to observe if the market reacts positively to what are now short-term oversold conditions. While a bounce does seem possible, we will still need proof of the resurgence of Demand before regaining full faith in the fact that the primary uptrend can continue.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
It will be a packed week of potentially game-changing Q1 earnings reports, with around 150 S&P 500 companies scheduled to report including some of the market’s Big Daddies and most intriguing names such as Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, Boeing, Tesla, Visa, UPS, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, T-Mobile, Pepsi, Verizon, General Motors, GE, Intel, AT&T, Comcast, Chipotle, Lockheed Martin, Halliburton, Spotify, Nucor, SAP, Freeport-McMoRan, Newmont and Southwest Airlines.
Economic data will include the first advance estimate of Q1 2024 Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The consensus prediction is of an annualized rate of 2.2%.
Also out this week is the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report for March, which includes the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, the Core PCE price index which is expected to be up 2.7% from a year earlier, versus a 2.8% rise through February.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
WTF is going on with auto and property insurance costs?
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - up 1.9% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) - down 6.5% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 3.2% last week, is up 4.2% so far this year and ended the week 5.4% below its all-time record closing high (03/28/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 2.8% last week, is down 3.8% so far this year and ended the week 20.4% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It fell 0.1% last week, is up 4.7% so far this year and is up 16.5% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.88%, one month ago: 6.87%, one year ago: 6.39%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 40%, one month ago: 77%, one year ago: 59%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 69%, one month ago: 77%, one year ago: 58%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 38% (44% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 28% (33% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 34% (23% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 4 (Bullish by 21 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 4% probability (1% a week ago)
No .. 96% probability (99% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 17% probability (28% a week ago)
No .. 83% probability (72% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.875% (implying two rate cuts), one month ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.16%, one month ago: 3.10%, one year ago: 4.41%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.62%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.38 to 0.35%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
In the end it proved to be a rotten week for U.S. stocks. A geopolitical shadow hung over markets the whole time with American officials warning of an imminent Iranian reprisal for Israel’s recent deadly air strike against a consulate in Syria, which kept the price of oil very perky. Meanwhile domestically, the big news was more hot inflation data and a slowly-emerging troubling concern about the prospects for interest rate cuts in 2024.
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon used his annual letter to shareholders on Monday to add his voice to the quietly growing chorus of those warning that the Fed’s next move might not be an interest rate cut at all, but rather a rate increase. He listed factors including ongoing fiscal spending, increased U.S. remilitarization, restructuring of global trade, continued geopolitical unrest and the capital demands of a new green economy as inflationary factors that could feasibly result in interest rates in fact moving higher this year, contrary to the conventional wisdom that interest rate cuts are just around the corner.
Stock traders, however, appeared to be biding their time to start the week, preferring to focus more on the eclipse and swapping highly dramatic (!!) New York earthquake stories ahead of U.S. inflation data out later in the week and prices barely moved on what was the second-lowest trading volume day of the year so far.
Tuesday was no different, another lackluster trading session for stocks with indexes little changed for a second straight day. Market interest rates continued their relentless march higher with the 2 year, 5 year and 10 year Treasury yields all touching new highs for the year. This pushed bond prices lower.
Pre-market on Wednesday, the release of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation showed that stubborn upward price pressures persisted in March, appearing to slam the door shut on any lingering hopes of a Fed interest rate cut in either May or June, especially since the May CPI reading is scheduled to come out on the same day as the Fed's June decision. Even the probability of a cut in July was pretty much reduced to a toss-up (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below).
March CPI rose 3.5% from a year earlier, higher than forecast and a meaningful pickup from February’s 3.2%. So-called Core prices (ex. food and energy) rose 3.8% from a year earlier, unchanged from the previous month but above expectations. This was the third consecutive hotter-than-anticipated inflation reading and reinforced the fact that, while inflation is not showing signs of rebounding, its decline has definitely stalled.
The stock market’s verdict was swift and brutal, it headed straight into free-fall right from the opening bell. The “zero-interest-rate-cut-in-2024-in-fact-expect-interest-rate-increases” theory of Jamie Dimon and friends suddenly did not seem so fanciful after all. Indeed, once ex-Treasury Secretary Larry Summers endorsed the theory on Bloomberg TV after seeing the inflation numbers, this particular elephant in the room suddenly started to become visible to everyone.
Those Treasury yields soared higher again, deeper into new 2024 record territory, sending bond prices spiraling even lower. Even the often-overly-optimistic futures market-driven expected total number of interest rate cuts in 2024 ticked down from three to two (remember, as recently as January, these same markets were assuming seven!).
The inflation picture got a bit more muddled on Thursday morning, when CPI’s cousin, the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers, actually came in a touch softer than expected. This helped stop the bleeding to a certain extent as both stock and bond prices stabilized following the rout of the previous day, indeed the NASDAQ in particular had something of a healthy pop, helped by Amazon’s stock price hitting a new all-time high.
Friday was the official kick-off of the Q1 2024 earnings season and the traditional curtain-raiser of earnings and forecasts from some of the major banks could be described as mixed at best. With spiking fears of an imminent flare-up in the Middle East conflict and the ongoing intertwined inflation and interest rate concerns, stock markets swiftly resumed their sharp downward trajectory and by the close, Friday’s nosedive had proved to be even worse than Wednesday’s.
Although it was clearly responsible for a major selloff in stocks last week, I want to put forward the case that the March CPI number was not, of itself, quite the destructive negative game-changer that many seem to now be fearing.
Contrary to what you may be seeing on TikTok and on the more wacky fringes of Fox Business, we are not yet witnessing a rebound in inflation. Just that the decline has stalled. Annualized rates are heavily dependent on the base number from a year earlier and even the 0.4% monthly increase was actually 0.359% if taken out an extra decimal place meaning that it was in fact only one hundredth of one percent away from actually meeting the expectations of a 0.3% increase, which might well have elicited a less dramatic market response.
Higher interest rates and elevated inflation do not of themselves mean stock prices are in danger of falling. The keys are growth and earnings, which we need to watch very closely since the safety net of imminent interest rate cuts is now likely gone. If Q1 2024 earnings are strong and economic growth remains stable, then stocks can still move higher despite lofty market interest rates and limited or even no Fed rate cuts.
With “higher for longer” interest rates as a result of inflation’s stickiness, the dominance of tech will likely continue to fade, most probably making way for sectors like financials (Friday’s earnings notwithstanding), consumer defensive, healthcare and energy. This could lead to a more unified, less fragmented stock market that could be a rising tide that lifts all boats.
It’s entirely possible that last week’s experience will soon be either a) a rather forgettable speed-bump in a continuing upward march in stock prices or, b) the turning point that brought the October 2023-April 2024 rally to an end. Which it is will be determined by how earnings and economic growth shake out in the coming weeks.
OTHER NEWS ..
Front-Running? .. Unlike the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank (ECB) seems quite happy to show that it is poised to kick off the global interest rate-cutting cycle among major economies very soon. It strongly hinted on Thursday that this would happen in June, which would likely front-run the Fed.
Air Contrast .. The share price of Boeing fell hard last week after a whistleblower claimed it took a number of shortcuts (including using Dawn dishwashing liquid as a lubricant for fitting a door) to speed up the assembly of the 787 Dreamliner and that the model is at severe risk of aging prematurely. The plane maker had earlier called such accusations “inaccurate” , but delivered the fewest aircraft in a quarter since mid-2021.
This is in stark contrast to the fortunes of one of the firm’s largest clients, Delta Air Lines whose forecast for this quarter blew past Wall Street’s estimates. It’s largely a function of well-heeled passengers willing to pay top fares rather than price-conscious flyers shopping for basic economy toward the rear of the plane. Revenue from the group of these more affluent flyers jumped 10% annualized last quarter, compared with 4% for the main cabin.
More Delinquency .. U.S. credit-card delinquency rates have hit a record level. Almost 3.5% of balances were at least 30 days past-due at the end of December, according to the Philadelphia Fed. That’s the highest figure since 2012. About 10% of borrowers now have an account balance that exceeds $5,200 and credit scores are getting worse.
The numbers signal added pressure on household finances in an era of swiftly increased interest rates. Only about one-third of cardholders pay their balance in full every month.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The near-20% divergence between the best and worst performing sectors of 2024 (energy and utilities, respectively) is high by historical standards and the long overdue and regularly-predicted market pullback appears to be under way.
Shorter term indicators had made this almost a certainty with decreasing momentum after the extraordinary market trajectory since last October in Large Caps in particular. The short term pain may continue for a while yet, but primary trends in technical indicators, even the more sensitive intermediate-term ones, are continuing to reflect a healthy market environment.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
About one-in-ten S&P 500 companies will report results this week, as Q1 2024 earnings season begins to get going. The consensus forecast is currently for an aggregated 5% year-over-year per share earnings growth from the companies in the index.
Netflix, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Proctor and Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, American Express, Morgan Stanley, United Airlines, UnitedHealth Group, Charles Schwab, TSMC, Abbot Labs, ASML, Schlumberger and Prologis are among the standouts.
The main highlight on the economic calendar next week is Monday’s Retail Sales report for March. There will also be a swarm of data on the U.S. housing market.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Home ownership affordability is at its worst levels since the 1980s. And it’s about a lot more than just higher mortgage rates.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 0.5% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Financials (two biggest holdings: Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase) - down 3.7% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 1.6% last week, is up 7.5% so far this year and ended the week 2.3% below its all-time record closing high (03/28/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 3.1% last week, is down 1.0% so far this year and ended the week 18.1% below its all-time record closing high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 1.8% last week, is up 4.6% so far this year and is up 15.1% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.82%, one month ago: 6.88%, one year ago: 6.27%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 71%, one month ago: 76%, one year ago: 50%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 76%, one month ago: 78%, one year ago: 56%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 44% (47% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 33% (31% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 23% (22% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 21 (Bullish by 25 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 1% probability (5% a week ago)
No .. 99% probability (95% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 28% probability (53% a week ago)
No .. 72% probability (47% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts), one month ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.24%, one month ago: 3.26%, one year ago: 4.62%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.50%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.50%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.34 to 0.38%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve last week.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Despite a valiant comeback effort on Friday, stocks endured a mostly jittery week and ended lower as some generally-accepted market narratives began to shift. Good news for the economy is finally becoming good news for stocks. The S&P 493 (without the so-called Magnificent Seven) is finally looking in good shape relative to the S&P 500 (which is dominated by the Magnificent Seven) and, according to an emerging heresy straight from the mouth of a leading Fed official no less, we may not be getting any interest rate cuts at all in 2024!
Trading on Monday was thinner than usual with many markets around the world still closed for Easter. Inflation figures released when the market was closed the previous Friday did little to bring forward the expected interest rate cut start date. The market-driven probability of a June rate cut briefly dipped below 50% for the first time and is now considered to be a coin flip (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below). Market interest rates spiked higher, driving both stock and bond prices lower.
The retreat in stock prices accelerated on Tuesday with all indexes declining substantially as traders grew more anxious about higher market interest rates and the possibility of a “too-hot” Jobs Report on Friday. It also didn’t help the inflation outlook that oil prices shifted significantly higher to multi-month highs as the temperature of the Middle East conflict rose after Israel killed seven food aid workers in Gaza including American, British, Australian and Polish citizens and simultaneously launched fatal airstrikes on an Iranian consulate in Syrian sovereign territory.
On Wednesday, the fall in bond prices caused by the increasing market interest rates started looking more like a rout. The deadly Taiwanese earthquake caused some brief concern in the chip space, but giant chip producer TSMC quickly reported only a negligible effect on production, successfully calming market nerves, but Intel sank over 8% in a matter of minutes on poor profit and sales data, obviously unrelated to the earthquake.
Fed chairman Jerome Powell pretty much came right out and said it in a speech at Stanford; a soft landing seems to be happening and that just because the path to 2% inflation is bumpy doesn't mean we're off it. This encouraged a few dip buyers to finally move in to stabilize things and take most stock prices a smidge higher for the session after a pretty rough couple of days.
Thursday started out with the indexes chugging along nicely until that well-known Fed big-mouth, the Minneapolis president Neel Kashkari (who has never met a media microphone that he could resist speaking into) suggested that if progress falters in the fight against inflation, there may well be a grand total of zero interest rate cuts in 2024. This possibility has always been whispered about in hushed tones on the fringes, but for a senior Fed official to come out and openly put it out there caused havoc in an already nervy market and stock prices tumbled far and fast.
Friday was Jobs Day, with the critical data release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics coming out before the market open. We learned that job growth surged in March, as employers added 303k new positions, almost 100k more than expected and January and February’s job creation was revised upward. Unemployment ticked down to 3.8% but, importantly for inflation calculations, average hourly earnings fell to the lowest level in nearly three years at 4.1% annualized. This was the 39th consecutive month of job growth in the U.S. which has seen a total of 15 million new jobs added over that time and the unemployment rate has been not been above 4% for over two years now.
With the U.S. economy now showing signs of re-accelerating and recession risk seemingly as far away as ever, a relieved stock market took prices solidly higher in response - erasing the previous day’s losses but not those of the week as a whole.
Interestingly, this upward move in stock prices was in violation of the recent conventional formula of; strong economic data = higher inflation risk = a delay in interest rate cuts = lower stock prices. As I have alluded to of late, this old school line of logic appears to be breaking down in an environment where the Fed is showing signs of tolerance of >2% inflation, at least for a while. The updated formula would now seem to be; strong economic data = less chance of a damaging recession = improvement in earnings outlook = higher stock prices.
The shaky news last week did not really threaten the pillars upon which the rally since October has been built, but with the S&P 500 currently priced for perfection and at such very high valuations (21X earnings, vs. a long term average of around 19X), it doesn’t need to be game-changing to cause a correction of a few percent.
The merest suggestion of a challenge to an accepted orthodoxy (in last week’s case, that of the assumption of multiple interest rate cuts in 2024 following Kashkari’s comments) can have a swift and nasty effect on stock prices. In other words, there’s ample room for disappointment with markets at these levels. Wall Street seems to be beginning to take the view that the chances of a 5%-10% pullback are probably greater in the short term than the chances of a further 5%-10% rally.
Even if stock prices are able to continue higher, there are signs that investors may finally be tiring of Big Tech in general and the Magnificent Seven (which has frankly shrunk to the Fab Five now) in particular and looking to move into into other sectors that have more reasonable valuations.
OTHER NEWS ..
Tesla Crashing ..Tesla continues to get battered as a shockingly lower sales report on Tuesday saw a record miss of even the most pessimistic of estimates which, along with higher inventory data, confirmed that the world is rapidly falling out of love with the company’s products and very possibly with a very distracted Elon Musk’s unhinged antics as well. Then on Friday, Reuters reported that Tesla’s long-held plans for a new lower price-point ($25k) vehicle have been scrapped although this was initially denied by Musk in a rather detail-free tweet that simply accused Reuters of lying.
Tesla is the worst performing stock in the S&P 500 index this year, indeed if you had bought the stock at the beginning of the year, you’d be down about 34% on that trade on Friday, while the S&P 500 (of which Tesla is a major component) has moved up 9% over the same time frame.
In other Elon news, Fidelity last week cut the valuation of its position in X/Twitter by 5.7% from just a month earlier. That now implies a 73% drop in the company’s value since his 2022 purchase.
Insurance Premium Storm .. U.S. home insurance rates are expected to reach a record high this year, with the biggest increases occurring in states prone to severe weather events. The average premium for homeowners’ insurance in the U.S. is expected to hit $2,522 by the end of the year, driven largely by intensifying natural disasters, rising reinsurance costs and higher fees for home repair. That figure would represent a 6% increase over that of 2023, and follows a roughly 20% increase across the past two years.
One of the motivations to buy a home is the idea that housing costs will remain relatively fixed or stable, compared to renting, but this trend of regular and meaningful insurance rate hikes is up-ending that narrative.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
With the S&P 500 considerably overheated and overbought on a fundamental valuation basis and the threat of volatility on the rise, three potential technical downside “gap fills” were in play for the index in Q2 , the lowest of which is 4,982, which would mean a roughly 4.3% further pullback from Friday’s closing price.
While the long-term market uptrend remains firmly intact, several short-term factors increase the probabilities of an overdue pullback. In the context of the healthy long-term trend, any short term turbulence that arises is likely best viewed as just that. Since March 7th, Selling Pressure has been slowly rising as Buying Power has moved sideways, though still in the dominant position relative to Selling Pressure
The NASDAQ, which led the rally off the 2022 lows, has begun to lag, Value is beginning to outperform Growth, oil is at multi-month highs adding upward pressure on inflation expectations which has hawkish policy implications for all major global central banks.
Bottom line, the 2024 equity market rally continues to demand respect and the constant new highs are inherently bullish for the broader equity market as we turn the corner into Q2. At the same time these developments mean that we are probably at the highest risk of a pause in the market’s primary uptrend, however temporary, in stock markets and other risk assets since we bounced off the lows back in October of last year.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The s**t-show that is the U.S. Congress returns this week, with the narrative surrounding a support package for Israel having changed significantly since lawmakers last focused on it and there’s a possible challenge to the position of Speaker. Buckle up for endless posturing nonsense.
Back in the real world, Q1 2024 earnings season kicks off in earnest on Friday with results from several big U.S. banks such as Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, BlackRock and State Street. Other companies releasing their results next week will include Delta Air Lines, CarMax, Constellation Brands, and Fastenal .
The economic-data highlight of the week will be highly-anticipated March inflation figures. On Wednesday, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation is expected to be up by 3.4% from a year earlier, with Core up 3.7%. The March Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation comes out the next day.
On the central bank front, the minutes from the last Fed rate-setting meeting will be published on Wednesday and the European Central Bank will announce a monetary-policy decision on Thursday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Can your portfolio survive a Near Death Experience? Probably not. But, to be honest, who cares?
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 3.8% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower) - down 3.2% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 0.8% last week, is up 9.0% so far this year and ended the week 0.9% below its all-time closing record high (03/27/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 2.8% last week, is up 1.9% so far this year and ended the week 15.7% below its all-time closing record high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It fell 0.7% last week, is up 2.9% so far this year and is up 12.7% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.79%, one month ago: 6.90%, one year ago: 6.28%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 83%, one month ago: 67%, one year ago: 42%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 83%, one month ago: 73%, one year ago: 54%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 47% (50% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 31% (28% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 22% (22% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 25 (Bullish by 28 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 5% probability (4% a week ago)
No .. 95% probability (96% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 53% probability (64% a week ago)
No .. 47% probability (36% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts), one month ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.12%, one month ago: 3.31%, one year ago: 4.84%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.50%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.38%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.39 to 0.34%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Stocks edged ever so slightly higher in a rather uninspiring, holiday-shortened week that brought a spectacular, record-filled first quarter to an end, but the weekly gain was almost entirely due to a solid performance on Wednesday. This was the fifth quarter out of the last six that both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ-100 have advanced. Bizarrely, the week's biggest and most important economic data point was released while stock markets were closed on Friday.
In the absence on Monday of any major economic updates or significant earnings reports, stock-specific concerns rippled through markets. As well as the Boeing C-Suite falling apart, technology stocks took a dive after the European Union's European Commission opened formal non-compliance investigations against Apple, Meta/Facebook and Alphabet/Google. Shares of Intel and Advanced Micro Devices stumbled on China-related news. Most major indexes traded lower on the day.
Not all earnings reports are created equal and that of UPS is regarded as a particularly important barometer for the economy as a whole. So when we heard a pretty grim near-term outlook from the parcel delivery giant on Tuesday (which didn’t even take into account the logistics-damaging fallout from the Baltimore bridge disaster), stocks took a negative turn to finish up the day in the red, despite earlier gains and a quite encouraging Durable Goods report.
The bulls regrouped on Wednesday and carried the indexes nicely higher to new all-time records. The process of month/quarter-end positioning by large financial institutions and some sideline-sitters and FOMO-sufferers finally caving in and playing catchup before the end the quarter was considered to be a part of the explanation for the northward trajectory of stocks.
With markets closed for Good Friday, Thursday was the last trading day of a barn-storming first quarter, with stocks having notched their best start to a year since 2019 (more about that in my Q1 2024 Quarterly Report coming later this week).
The third and final Gross Domestic Product (GDP) revision for Q4 2023 was raised to 3.4%, confirming that the U.S. economy performed even more strongly at the end of last year than previously thought. It ended up being a quiet session with traders seemingly comfortable with their positioning and allowing Q1 2024 to play out uneventfully with indexes essentially flat on the day, ever so slightly higher for the week and, fittingly, reaching yet another all-time record high for the S&P 500 for the 22nd time in about 60 trading days to end the quarter.
While stock markets were closed on Friday, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index was released. The core version is what the Fed uses to gauge what it views as the true inflation figure and it came in right in line with expectations, rising 0.3% in February for a 2.5% annualized rate.
There was some pushback last week against Fed chairman Jerome Powell’s apparent embrace of imminent interest rate cuts. Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller told the Economic Club of New York that there is no rush to cut interest rates. He added that he’d want to see “at least a couple of months of better inflation data” before cutting, while also noting the strong economy and robust hiring as further reasons to wait. But a couple of months of data takes us handily to the June Fed meeting and investors anyhow have a tendency to dismiss what Waller says as he is regarded to be on the Fed’s more hawkish wing.
Instead there was a continued confidence last week that the Federal Reserve may well begin reducing interest rates as soon as June (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below). Some bond traders are even cautiously beginning to reload their bets on that being the case, despite being badly burned by the same narrative just a couple of months ago.
Even those of you who don’t follow financial markets closely are probably hearing a lot of things like:
“Banks are about to collapse because of commercial real estate exposure.”
”U.S. deficits are so bad, foreign investors will stop buying U.S. Treasury bonds and the dollar is doomed”
“Consumers are out of savings and retail spending is about to collapse.”
and the big one .. “If you don’t own a lot of tech, you’re going to underperform.”
There could well be an element of potential truth in each of these statements, including the last one where, sure, if you didn’t own a bunch of tech in 2023, you most likely did underperform. But facts show that it’s not really true this year and tech is not even the standout sector so far in 2024 (both energy and financials have done just as well). Never forget that today’s media, both regular and financial, is headline-driven and click-hungry. Scary or shocking headlines are what grab attention, but more often than not, these headlines don’t match the full extent of what is almost always a far more complex reality.
Stay skeptical out there!
OTHER NEWS ..
Baltimore Bridge Fallout .. The tragic accident and deadly bridge collapse in Baltimore last week risks disrupting global supply chains and could even possibly have an impact on the level of U.S. inflation, according to experts. It is also poised to leave thousands without work for a while and will doubtless lead to claims hitting insurance companies’ inboxes that will run into billions of dollars and likely be tied up in courts for many years.
Docks in New Jersey and Virginia face the threat of being overwhelmed by traffic that’s being forced away from Baltimore, which is one of the busiest ports on the U.S. East Coast, particularly important for imports and exports of automobiles and coal.
At the very least, the incident will result in some economic data being “noisy” for the next few months and that could be a problem, given the high importance of such data on assessing the prospects for an economic soft or hard landing and its impact on stock prices.
Chocolate Meltup .. Cocoa is now more expensive than copper. The futures price for the commodity extended its surge - reaching $10,000 for the first time ever - as a supply crunch grips the market and chocolate manufacturers fight over the short supply of beans. $10k cocoa is becoming a problem. Prices have spiked due to a drought combined with a lack of professionalized cultivation in Ghana (the world’s second largest producer of cocoa beans) in particular, where the crop is still grown overwhelmingly by poor smallholders who are just making enough to subsist, lacking the means to re-invest in their plots.
BNP Paribas has even downgraded Hershey's stock because of it. For now, at least, these increases are unlikely to be passed on to the consumer. But if these prices are here to stay, Ozempic might not be Big Chocolate's only problem.
He’s Baaaaaack! .. Adam Neumann is back again. The Israeli ex-founder of WeWork made an offer of about $500 million for the wreckage of the company that once paid him a billion dollars just to walk away, potentially adding another dramatic chapter to the saga of the troubled startup.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
A more unified advance appears to be underway as most technical measures of Demand/Supply, breadth and momentum remain elevated. There is evidence of investors accumulating even the most beaten-down stocks, most of which are lying around in the Small Cap segment of the market, which is an overall positive sign for the market.
These soaring measures of breadth and momentum do, however, come with their own risks. They are now pushing into levels that are historically contrarian (i.e. where things have taken an abrupt turn for the worse in the past), pointing to elevated reversal risks. Unless, of course,“this time it’s different”.
The S&P 500 is trading above 5,200 at a never-before-sustained valuation multiple of 21.5X the expected current-year earnings of the component stocks. Another 10% gain from here would take the S&P 500 to just shy of 5,800, which would mean an extremely stretched multiple of 23.8X. Conversely, a 10% pullback from here would take the S&P 500 down towards 4,735, which would mean a much more reasonable multiple of 19.5X. Just saying.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
It’s Jobs Week! The release of the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) data for February is on Tuesday and will show the extent of job vacancies and an update on the Quit Rate.
The full Jobs Report is out on Friday and an additional 180k payrolls in March (vs. the 275k added in February) is expected, as is a slight decline in the unemployment rate from 3.9% to 3.8%.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
I was a guest on the On The Mark video podcast helping to explain why an all-cash real estate purchase is a really bad idea.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - up 2.8% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) - down 0.9% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 0.4% last week, is up 10.1% so far this year and ended the week atits all-time closing record high (03/28/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 2.5% last week, is up 4.8% so far this year and ended the week 13.3% below its all-time closing record high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 0.3% last week, is up 3.1% so far this year and is up 12.7% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.87%, one month ago: 6.94%, one year ago: 6.34%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 76%, one month ago: 64%, one year ago: 15%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 79%, one month ago: 71%, one year ago: 45%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 50% (43% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 28% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 22% (27% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 28 (Bullish by 16 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 4% probability (12% a week ago)
No .. 96% probability (88% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 64% probability (70% a week ago)
No .. 36% probability (30% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts), one month ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.05%, one month ago: 3.31%, one year ago: 5.01%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.49%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.20%) is for the 7-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.37 to 0.39%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Wall Street was in a very optimistic mood last week, boosted by a highly positive take on the outcome of the Fed interest rate-setting meeting on Wednesday and its quarterly “Dot Plot” projections. AI confidence continued to thrive and the process of global interest rate cuts finally got under way in Switzerland. The upshot was the best week of the year so far for stocks.
Nvidia’s Developer Conference on Monday, which showcased spectacular new chips aimed at extending the company’s dominance of AI, briefly distracted Wall Street from its laser focus on Wednesday’s Fed meeting (see below). Along with Alphabet/Google’s announcement that it is in talks with Apple to build its artificial-intelligence engine Gemini into the iPhone, it powered a rally as Big Tech partied like it was 2023. Even poor old Tesla managed to get in on the act. Most of the indexes moved higher as a result.
On Tuesday morning, an era came to an end when the Bank of Japan became the last major central bank in the world to abandon negative interest rates. It moved its target range up to 0.00% to 0.10%, its first rate increase since 2007. U.S. stocks staged an afternoon rally after a shaky start, led again by Big Tech to notch another positive day.
Wednesday was Fed Day. As recently as December of last year, March 20th had been circled on everyone’s calendar as the assumed kickoff date for six or seven interest rate cuts in 2024. Those days are long gone, market-driven probabilities now point to June or even July as the most likely starting point for maybe just two or perhaps three cuts this year.
Not wanting to front-run the Fed, the market sat on its hands in advance of the entirely predictable announcement at 2pm ET of no change to interest rates, choosing instead to focus on the quarterly “Dot Plot” projections from individual committee members which, relative to December’s plot, predicted higher inflation for longer, stronger economic growth, lower unemployment and an unchanged median forecast of three interest cuts in 2024 (and projecting three more in 2025, down from four in the previous quarter’s plot) although an increasing number of committee members are now looking at no more than two cuts this year.
Chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference was a masterclass at saying absolutely nothing new and Wall Street decided to take the Dot Plot to mean that the Fed will tolerate slightly higher inflation for longer, keeping summer interest rate cuts on the table and Goldilocks still alive.
Stocks ripped higher in the last hour and a half of the day’s trading as a result and the trio of the S&P 500 index, the NASDAQ and the Dow Jones Industrial Average all closed the session at new record highs, the first time that has happened since late 2021.
On Thursday morning, the Bank of England held interest rates steady in the UK but another era began when the Swiss National Bank surprised everyone by cutting its rates by 0.25%, becoming the first major central bank to do so since the hiking cycle began at the beginning of 2022. Wednesday afternoon’s momentum followed through with U.S. stocks continuing to march higher on the back of the Fed’s continued three-rate-cuts-in-2024 projection, deeper and deeper into record territory.
With no major economic data and very few earnings reports on the docket, trading was muted on Friday as the bulls took a breather, even though the NASDAQ still managed a small gain on the day to set yet another new record high.
The fact is we’re going to exit 2024 with interest rates likely above 4.50% and that is absolutely not where we thought we’d be when this stock market rally began. So far, the economy has had enough impetus to withstand this, but that will not last forever.
The trick to a soft landing is the Fed being able to cut interest rates before the economy begins to lose momentum and that is why rate cuts sooner rather than later are so positive for markets, as they reduce the chance of a slowdown.
It’s for this reason that the most important economic data lately hasn’t been inflation, it’s the growth metrics starting to show signs of a loss of momentum. If data consistently starts to show that economic growth is cracking - but the Fed can’t cut interest rates in time because of sticky inflation - then the chances of a hard landing will rise sharply and that’s the biggest negative we all need to watch for going forward.
If the S&P 500 was at 4,000 or even 4,500, a slowdown wouldn’t be so worrisome. But it’s at 5,234, and if economic data begins to roll over, a >10% pullback can feasibly happen very quickly and even then, it’s tough to say we’d be at levels of solid support. The point here is that we don’t need real recession risk to cause a meaningful pullback. Just legitimate growth concerns could do it, given where valuations are.
Bottom line, we need to focus on growth. Acutely slowing growth is the rally killer we need to watch for. High inflation and higher interest rates aren’t, of themselves, rally killers. It’s that both of them make a slowing more possible and that’s the real problem.
For now, however, the bullish drumbeat of generally still-solid growth, largely falling inflation, impending Fed interest rate cuts and seemingly endless AI enthusiasm is alive and well and many major stock indexes are breaking new highs almost daily as a consequence.
OTHER NEWS ..
Still Risky .. Investors got a big wakeup call last week that the dangers of, and the fraud and bad actor risk associated with, crypto investing have not gone away, even now that Bitcoin (BTC) is available in a nice, user-friendly and regulated ETF wrapper. The BitMex crypto exchange said it was investigating “unusual trading activity”, including possible misconduct, that led to a flash crash in BTC on its platform after hours on Monday evening. At one point, the price of BTC against Tether’s USDT stablecoin fell to as low as $8,900 on BitMEX while it was trading above $66,000 everywhere else.
It appeared that this was one big “whale” investor, or perhaps a few, heavily selling BTC steadily over a few hours in what seemed to be a very planned and co-ordinated fashion. Over 400 bitcoins were dumped over the course of two hours.
Happy Talk .. Finland was crowned the world’s happiest country for the seventh consecutive year in the global life-satisfaction rankings, but a sharp drop in living standards among young Americans meant that the world’s biggest economy failed to make the top twenty happiest populations on earth for the first time ever.
Denmark and Iceland remained second and third, respectively, in The World Happiness Report unveiled on Wednesday by the United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network. The United States tumbled from 15th to 23rd in the world, “driven mostly by a large drop in the well-being of Americans under the age of 30,” the report said. The results are based on three-year averages, reducing the impact of changes over a single year and is based on factors such as gross domestic product, a sense of freedom, life expectancy, perception of institutional and political corruption in society, having someone to count on, generosity and levels and intensity of violence and crime, including political violence. Among specific age groups, Lithuania topped the world ranking for children and people under 30 (the U.S. came in 62nd in this category), while Denmark is the world’s happiest nation for those 60 and older.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
While the longer term uptrend has remained solidly in place from a technical standpoint, in the short term there had been signs in the last few weeks suggesting that a pullback in the major price indexes was increasingly likely. In the context of such a robust long-term market uptrend, any such pullback would even be viewed as a welcome rest for apparently overheated stocks and serve as an opportunity for the underinvested.
But last week many of those slightly shaky short term indicators actually began to repair themselves quite impressively and pretty much the entire technical picture looks rosy again across the board.
The new all-time price highs that appeared last week were not limited to the broad-based major price indexes. The S&P 400 Mid-Cap Index also reached a new all-time high, as did sector indexes in Financials, Industrials, Basic Materials and Technology. Even the Healthcare sector index is close to breaking its all-time high which it only just set last month.
Several market sentiment indicators are starting to reach extreme levels. This is not a reason to sell, but rather a comment on the investing environment. In the short term at least it may all be too good to be true.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
U.S. stock and bond markets will be closed on Friday in observance of Good Friday.
The final trickle of earnings releases this week will include those from GameStop, Walgreens, Carnival, Cintas and McCormick.
The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index for February comes out on Friday. The core version is what the Fed uses to gauge what it views as the true inflation figure and is therefore a crucial reading. It is forecast to show a rise of 2.8% year over year, matching the January number.
Before then, we get to see the Durable Goods report on Tuesday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Josh Brown bluntly explains how financial media market predictions are such b*t.*
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 3.2% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower) for the second week in a row - down 1.3% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 2.4% last week, is up 9.7% so far this year and ended the week 0.2% below its all-time closing record high (03/21/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 1.4% last week, is up 2.2% so far this year and ended the week 15.5% below its all-time closing record high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 0.8% last week, is up 3.0% so far this year and is up 13.8% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.74%, one month ago: 6.90%, one year ago: 6.42%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 70%, one month ago: 64%, one year ago: 19%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 75%, one month ago: 72%, one year ago: 41%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 43% (46% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 30% (32% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 27% (22% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 16 (Bullish by 24 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 12% probability (6% a week ago)
No .. 88% probability (94% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on June 12th?
Yes .. 75% probability (59% a week ago)
No .. 25% probability (41% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts), one month ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.15%, one month ago: 3.34%, one year ago: 4.85%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in the space of about a month during the February/March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.20%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.41% to 0.37%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It was a jittery week for stocks during which data was released that confirmed that the American consumer may be putting the brakes on spending and that the rate of inflation is decelerating at a slower pace. Markets chose to focus on the fact that stickier inflation likely means higher for longer when it comes to interest rates and that drove stock prices lower for the second week in a row.
After a quiet weekend on the newswires and with CPI and PPI inflation due out later in the week with the potential to impact interest rate cut expectations and perhaps remembering how last month’s surprise CPI print tripped everyone up, stock markets took a wait-and-see attitude on Monday, the fourth anniversary of the official declaration of the COVID pandemic, and prices were barely changed.
On Tuesday the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation emphasized this continued stickiness. Both the core and headline readings rose 0.4% in February, which was slightly up from the previous month and higher than estimates, for a marginally lower year-on-year rate of 3.8% for the important core number. Prices particularly jumped for used cars, air travel and clothes. This buried the hope that the surprisingly high January figure had been some kind of seasonal one-off blip in an otherwise steady downward march in the rate of inflation.
The near-certainty required by the Fed that 2% inflation is around the corner before embarking on meaningful rate-cutting clearly remains elusive, but Wall Street seems to have finally made its peace with this fact and, led by the tech sector, stocks moved higher on the day with the S&P 500 closing back in record high territory for the 17th time this year on the back of a “it could have been worse” mentality for CPI.
The wait-and-see approach resumed on Wednesday with CPI’s wholesale cousin, PPI, due out the following day to give the Fed a second look at the state of inflation and its last before this week’s interest rate-setting meeting. Stocks spent the day hugging the unchanged line on lighter than usual trading volume.
On Thursday morning, the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers came in hot as well, up 0.6% in February for an annualized 1.6% rate, the highest in six months and double what had been forecast. We also learned that Retail Sales somewhat rebounded in February, up 0.6% for the month, but this increase was below estimates. It also only helped in part to reverse a significant downwardly-revised 1.1% fall in January.
The twin disappointments of inflation data and slowing consumer demand proved disheartening to Wall Street as it gives the Fed continued cover for its delay in cutting interest rates and ignited the conversation around a first cut now being in July instead of June (the market-driven probability of an interest rate cut in June swiftly collapsed from 90% to 59% last week). The most popular market-projected number of interest rate cuts in 2024 fell last week to three, finally bringing it into line with what the Fed has been saying for months (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below).
Remember, only a matter of weeks ago there was an almost-universal assumption that the rate cutting process would begin in March and that there would be at the very least six rate cuts in 2024. Those expectations are distant memories now and stock prices slumped on Thursday and then continued falling on Friday, which was also a so-called “triple-witching” day when the expiry of a huge pile of derivatives and futures contracts amplify price swings. All this dragged the indexes into lightly negative territory for the week.
Is there some calmness ahead for markets? Above 5100 in the S&P 500 index, all the positives (Goldilocks economic data, summer interest rate cuts, still-falling inflation) are now mostly already priced in, unlike when the index was at, say, 4000. So, while the simple reinforcement of those concepts may help support the market and justify these levels, it’s unlikely to - of itself - drive things materially higher from here, particularly as economic momentum slows.
Yet as discussed before, meaningful downward movement is going to require something actually bad to happen to scare off the dip-buyers. An example would be if the evidence becomes strong that inflation isn’t slowing anymore, that economic growth is struggling or that the Fed definitely won’t cut in the summer. None is this is being indicated right now, Last week’s mildly disappointing CPI and PPI reports certainly did not qualify as such a development.
So without a big catalyst of some kind, things could well just stay relatively rangebound for a while, simply churning while we wait for the next big trigger to tip the scale one way or another.
OTHER NEWS .. (SOCIAL MEDIA EDITION)
And So It Begins .. The U.S. presidential election is just eight months away, a highly unpopular - but now confirmed - rematch between Trump and Biden. From now on, when either candidate mentions publicly-traded companies, investors need to pay attention.
On Monday morning, Trump said in an interview, "I consider Facebook to be an enemy of the people." Meta/Facebook stock promptly fell more than 4%, having run up about 40% this year and hit an all-time high just days earlier. The stock's decline served as perhaps the first reminder this cycle to investors that election risk really is a thing.
Historically, elections have been generally good news for U.S. stocks. The S&P 500 is rarely more buoyant than when a sitting president is up for reelection - in the ten prior instances of this since 1952, the index has never finished down that year, with the average return standing at 12.2%, a premium of over 2% on a typical year.
However, the sheer unpredictability of what will come out of the mouths of these two old men, as well as the ease with which they can both shamelessly U-turn on previously-held positions whenever it suits them (Trump and TikTok being the latest example), makes this election year particularly intriguing on Wall Street.
Clock Ticking For TikTok? .. The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill on Wednesday that would require China's ByteDance to divest TikTok or face a ban of the social media app in the U.S., impacting 170 million users who spend an average of 97 minutes per day on the app (much more than is spent on any other social media platform - users spend less than an hour a day on average on Instagram, Snapchat or Facebook, for example).
The absurdly-named Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act prohibits “distributing, maintaining, or providing internet hosting services for a foreign adversary controlled application (e.g., TikTok)." The bill was introduced by House Republicans who said the app could pose a national security threat due to its ties to ByteDance, TikTok's Chinese parent company, citing concerns China's government could potentially require it to share data. After passing with bipartisan support, the bill moved to the Senate, where its progress could potentially be slowed down somewhat by increased scrutiny and more probing questions about the possible unintended consequences of the legislation.
The regulation could also apply to other social media companies that are "controlled by a foreign adversary and [have] been determined by the President to present a significant threat to national security," but is currently targeting only ByteDance and TikTok by name.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Market breadth, uptrend participation, and Demand intensity continue to broaden, despite the indexes hitting some speed-bumps over the last couple of weeks. Buying power has been in an uptrend since mid-January and continues to dominate Selling pressure, which is locked in a sideways range.
Since the start of 2024, the S&P 500 index has essentially been been closely tracking an up-trending straight line with remarkably little divergence and there is currently no real reason for investors focused on the intermediate and longer term to deviate from their course of action of systematically buying stocks.
The shorter term outlook is less clear, however, with some signs of fading Demand momentum although Supply has still yet to awaken.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week’s Fed rate setting meeting which concludes on Wednesday will be a triple-header consisting of the policy announcement (universally expected to be no change in interest rates), chairman Jerome Powell’s press conference and a new quarterly economic projection, aka the “Dot Plot” with the committee members expectations for interest rate changes stretching into the future which will be scrutinized by economists, analysts, pundits and nerds like me within an inch of its life. The data on the economy and inflation have generally been stronger than expected since the last Dot Plot release back in December.
On Tuesday, the Bank of Japan issues its own policy decision and is expected to make its first interest rate increase since 2007.
Highlights on the earnings calendar this week include results from Fedex, Nike, General Mills, Darden Restaurants and Micron Technologies.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
It’s tough to figure out exactly how to interpret the recent run-up in the price of Bitcoin. This is the best attempt I have seen.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 4.0% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower) - down 2.6% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 0.4% last week, is up 7.3% so far this year and ended the week 1.3% below its all-time closing record high (03/12/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 2.2% last week, is up 0.9% so far this year and ended the week 16.6% below its all-time closing record high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 0.6% last week, is up 2.0% so far this year and is up 12.7% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.88%, one month ago: 6.77%, one year ago: 6.60%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of an ongoing technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 76%, one month ago: 55%, one year ago: 18%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 76%, one month ago: 71%, one year ago: 37%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 46% (52% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 32% (26% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 22% (22% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 24 (Bullish by 30 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on March 20th?
Yes .. 2% probability (4% a week ago)
No .. 98% probability (96% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 6% probability (24% a week ago)
No .. 94% probability (76% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.375% (implying four rate cuts), one month ago: 4.125% (implying five rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
HIGH YIELD CREDIT SPREAD ..
One week ago: 3.26%, one month ago: 3.34%, one year ago: 4.09%
This closely-watched spread is a strong indicator of the risk inherent in the professional marketplace and the extent to which such risk is growing or easing. The high-yield credit spread is the difference between the interest rates offered for riskier low-grade, high yield (“junk”) bonds and those for stable high-grade, lower yield bonds, including deemed risk-free government bonds, of similar maturity.
A reading that is high/increasing indicates that “junkier” bond issuers are being forced to move their yields higher to compensate for a greater risk of default and is considered to be a reflection of broadly deteriorating economic and market conditions which could well lead to lower stock prices.
A reading that is low/decreasing indicates a reduced necessity for higher yields. This reflects less prevailing market risk and more stable or improving conditions in the overall economy and for stock prices.
For context .. this reading was regularly below 3.00% for much of the 1990s, got as high as 10.59% after 9/11 and the subsequent Dotcom Crash of 2002, peaked at 21.82% in the Great Financial Crisis in December 2008 and spiked from 3.62% to 10.87% in just a month during the March 2020 COVID crash. The historical average since 1996 is a little over 4.00%.
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.52%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.31%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.39% to 0.41%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Stocks took a long road to nowhere, ending the week right back where they started it - with a sharp fall and then a solid comeback rally with yet more new all-time highs reached at one point. In the end, however, the S&P 500 just missed out on achieving a 17th week of gains out of the last 19.
Markets floated gently lower without real directional conviction on Monday, with a lack of any real catalysts ahead of (in order of appearance) Super Tuesday, Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s testimony to a House committee, Biden’s State of the Union address and the Jobs Report, all later in the week.
Sentiment turned properly negative on Tuesday, due in large part to an intensification of the ongoing splintering of the so-called Magnificent Seven, with both Apple and Tesla tanking hard, primarily as a result of increasingly concerning negative trends in sales in China for both firms. Contagion spread to to other corners of the tech and tech-adjacent space and all the indexes, particularly the tech-heavy NASDAQ, took a significant dive.
Super Tuesday also pretty much cemented the matchup that no-one wants; Trump/Biden II in November. It would be naïve to think that there is not going to be associated uncertainty and volatility in late summer and into the fall (or potentially even earlier) and most likely for weeks or even months afterward. Markets have not yet factored this in.
Wednesday saw Powell show up in Congress, presenting us with the ludicrous spectacle of a highly intelligent chairman of the Federal Reserve being grilled by some of the financially illiterate law-makers that put the economy in peril every few weeks by risking government shutdowns through grandstanding and political posturing.
Predictably, he stayed entirely on message; rates have peaked, they will be cut, but it’s not happening soon because the Fed needs more proof inflation is going to get to 2%. Which of course was saying absolutely nothing new and Wall Street took a kind of “nothing-to-see-here” attitude to his words and instead proceeded to try and repair the damage from the previous day’s selloff, with the S&P 500 clawing back about half of the week’s losses.
On Thursday, the European Central Bank held interest rates steady at 4.0%. Markets now expect the first rate cut in the EuroZone will come in June. Jerome Powell Day Two in Washington DC saw him go a little further than on Day One, stating that the central bank is “not far” from being confident enough to cut rates and these rate reductions“can and will begin” this year. U.S. stocks responded positively, resuming their rally from the previous day and completing a full recovery from the losses of Monday and Tuesday to reach yet more new all-time highs.
The Jobs Report on Friday proved ambiguous, showing an increase in payrolls of 275k in February, topping forecasts, but both the January and December numbers were revised downwards and the unemployment rate moved up to 3.9% (a two-year high). Average hourly earnings, watched closely as an inflation indicator, rose just 0.1% on the month and 4.3% from a year ago, lower than both estimates and January’s rate. Biden’s spikier-than-expected State of the Union speech from the previous evening gave Wall Street nothing to focus on one way or another.
Traders eventually opted for the “glass is half empty” interpretation of the employment data, perhaps in combination with some profit-taking from recent gains. Momentum petered out, particularly in tech names and the S&P 500 shifted lower to finish the week almost unchanged.
The market’s relentless rally, in which it embraces even the mostly slightly bullish news and ignores any bad news, is raising the question: can anything make the stock market decline? The answer, of course, is “yes,” but in order for this market to decline, something actually bad has to happen. Negative nuance is no longer enough.
What kind of bad things are we are talking about here? Knowing this not only helps when looking for red flags pointing to a possible big decline but also when trying to differentiate between what is just a healthy pullback of a few percent which can help create a springboard for further advances and a true and sustained change of direction for stock prices.
There are a few, but the four main categories are:
AI turns out not to represent a fundamental change in business productivity or profitability (so much of the rally is built on this premise). In the end, AI will have to make non-tech companies money and it’s not yet clear exactly how many end-user companies will be able to utilize AI to actually meaningfully increase revenue and/or produce substantial and sustainable cost savings.
Economic growth decelerates or even contracts to a level that threatens the earnings growth of major U.S. companies. That’s very different than the rather gentle easing that we are currently seeing.
The Fed explicitly or even implicitly rules out any interest rate cuts this year and in fact appears to be even entertaining the idea that the next move in rates may actually be higher again. If there is no negative impact from high rates on the labor market and inflation is in large part continuing to decline, then there’s simply no urgency to cut interest rates preemptively and take a risk with a bounce-back in inflation.
Consumer inflation reignites and begins a persistent move higher again. So far all we are really seeing is something of a flatlining of the rate at which inflation is decreasing.
This is the stuff to watch out for.
OTHER NEWS ..
Elon’s Vengeance .. Poor old Elon Musk had yet another rough week. He fell below Jeff Bezos on the Global Rich List (mostly as a result of the diverging performance of their respective stock holdings), there was an embarrassing email dump from OpenAI with whom he is having a childish toxic spat, Tesla’s stock keeps on crapping out (not helped by arsonists successfully targeting a production plant near Berlin) and he is facing yet another big lawsuit, this time by four former top executives of Twitter, who are demanding $128 million in unpaid severance.
The executives, former CEO Parag Agrawal, former CFO Ned Segal, former chief legal officer Vijaya Gadde and former general counsel Sean Edgett filed the lawsuit in California federal court on Monday. The lawsuit contends that, as his $44 billion takeover deal neared its completion in October 2022, Musk tried to back out but failed and then concocted a made-up reason to fire the four executives simply to get out of paying them the severance packages to which they were all legally entitled (he cited “gross negligence” and “willful misconduct” as reasons).
The executives were running Twitter at the time when the company sued Musk to force him to close on the deal to which he had earlier contractually committed, but had then unsuccessfully tried to squirm out of and “for their efforts, Musk vowed a lifetime of revenge,” the lawsuit said.
It added; “Under Musk’s control, Twitter has become a scofflaw, stiffing employees, landlords, vendors and others. Musk doesn’t pay his bills, believes the rules don’t apply to him and uses his wealth and power to run roughshod over anyone who disagrees with him.”
Want A Job? ..There are some new positions available where work-from-home is unlikely to be an option. NASA is seeking new astronaut candidates for the first time in four years. Competition, unsurprisingly, is always fierce. In 2020, there were more than 12,000 applicants for 10 positions. This year is likely to be a crowded race as well, but America’s return to the moon is providing more opportunities for astronaut missions.
Stay-at-home dad duties .. The share of fathers caring for their households were higher in western states than those in the South, according to the Burning Glass Institute. Alaska, Oregon and New Mexico topped the list of states with the highest ratio of men—age 18 to 59—who weren’t in the labor force, with a child under 14, had a working spouse and were the main caregivers. Alabama and Louisiana had the lowest ratios.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
One effect of all these new all-time highs we are experiencing with the indexes in 2024 is that levels that had formerly been resistance levels in a rising market suddenly become strong support levels when markets start to fall. So it is with the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ in particular right now. The S&P 500 has been in technically overbought territory for about seven weeks now, but markets can remain in this state for remarkably long periods of time - although the ugliness of the reversal can often be worse when an extended overbought condition eventually does come to an end.
Demand is noticeably broadening from Large Caps to include Mid Caps and so Small Caps are worth monitoring, especially should the big dogs begin to show any vulnerability. As Mid Caps have joined the Large Caps in ascending to new highs in recent weeks, it is apparent that investors are slowly expanding their portfolios to include smaller names and the consequence is a healthy widening of the breadth of the rally.
Despite lingering short term concerns about a possibly overbought condition, we saw yet again last week that when stocks fall, there seem to be plenty of buyers lying in wait at the lower prices to scoop up what they see as bargains. The difference recently is that we are finally beginning to also witness this phenomenon with Small Cap stocks.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Just a few more Q4 2023 earnings reports to go, this week we will see Adobe, Oracle, Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Williams-Sonoma and Ulta Beauty.
The big economic release will be the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation on Tuesday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
What is extremely overrated in personal finance? Spoiler: retiring early and owning an investment property both make the list.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - up 3.3% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 2.5% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 0.2% last week, is up 7.7% so far this year and ended the week 0.6% below its all-time closing record high (03/07/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 0.4% last week, is up 3.1% so far this year and ended the week 14.7% below its all-time closing record high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It fell 1.1% last week, is up 1.3% so far this year and is up 11.2% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.94%, one month ago: 6.64%, one year ago: 6.73%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of a technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 68%, one month ago: 62%, one year ago: 37%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 73%, one month ago: 70%, one year ago: 54%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 52% (47% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 26% (32% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 22% (21% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 30 (Bullish by 18 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on March 20th?
Yes .. 4% probability (5% a week ago)
No .. 96% probability (95% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 24% probability (25% a week ago)
No .. 76% probability (75% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.375% (implying four rate cuts), one month ago: 4.125% (implying five rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.06%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year remained unchanged at 0.39%, indicating no change in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It was more of the same. For the second week running, stocks played a nervous waiting game for the first three days of the week, afraid of being disappointed by some data that was coming out on Thursday. Then, also just like the week before, when the data proved to not be as bad as feared, stock markets got bought up nicely on Thursday and Friday to end the week with gains and yet more new all time record highs.
Monday was quiet as Wall Street traders digested the previous week’s melt-up and decided to hold their fire ahead of the influential PCE inflation numbers later in the week. It was suspected that that this release could well confirm the inflation stickiness indicated by the most recent Consumer and Producer Price Index data, thereby justifying the Federal Reserve’s highly cautious approach to lowering interest rates any time soon. Stocks moved a touch lower.
This waiting game continued on Tuesday. The latest data on Durable Goods sales and consumer sentiment both came in softer than expected. The can braced itself for yet another kick down the road as noises coming out of Washington DC took a decidedly optimistic turn regarding a deal to avoid the potential government shutdown. This proved ultimately to be misleading, as we will see later.
Suspicions continued to deepen that the inflation data coming out on Thursday would disappoint - but anyone selling stocks since October has usually got burned by the experience so the net outcome was another holding pattern for most of the indexes, although the recently-battered Small Caps actually ended up having a pretty good session.
Stocks continued to struggle to find any direction and experienced small losses on a largely uneventful Wednesday after a report showed that Q4 2023 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is estimated to have risen at a revised 3.2% annualized pace, compared with an expectation of 3.3%. Consumer spending advanced at a 3.0% rate, a bit faster than estimates. Over the course of the entire year, the U.S. economy expanded 2.5% in 2023.
When the government shutdown can did get kicked on Wednesday evening, it didn’t make it very far down the road. The House agreed to extend federal funding for all of a week and the lights-out date was pushed back by a whole two weeks, so the key shutdown dates are now March 8th (Part I) and March 22nd (Part II). This half-baked, pathetic punt was then passed in the Senate the next day and sent to Biden for his signature. Which means that we will face the same political posturing s**t show in Congress all over again this week and likely for the next couple of weeks as well.
We finally got to see the hotly-anticipated Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index on Thursday morning before markets opened for business. This is the measure that the Fed uses to determine what inflation is really doing and is therefore arguably the most important of economic statistics these days.
It showed an increase of 0.4% for January and 2.8% from a year ago. This was entirely in line with expectations, leaving the fears experienced over the preceding few days unwarranted. Wall Street exhaled in relief and resumed its steady buying of stocks which proved enough to send the S&P 500 to (you guessed it!) its 14th new record closing high of 2024 and the NASDAQ to its first new record closing high since November 2021.
The price of the stock of commercial real estate lender New York Community Bancorp tumbled further on Friday after the regional bank admitted that it had discovered “material weaknesses” in how it tracks loan risk. The stock plunged 30% in a matter of minutes to a level 75% below where it was as recently as August of last year.
The broad market did fine, however, on the back of continued relief surrounding the previous day’s inflation figures and some rather benign Fed-speak. All the indexes ran higher again and yet more new all-time record closing highs were recorded. The bears are in full retreat right now.
The market’s sense last week was that the doomsayers’ ongoing narrative that “any day now a catastrophic number will derail the rally and send the market into a tailspin” was once again proved wrong and that the safest reaction in response seems to be to just keep on steadfastly buying.
My view is that any meaningful derailment of this rally will be a process and not an event. If we are watching carefully enough, we should see it begin to unfold in real time.
All the while, there continues to be a quiet but steady drumbeat in the deep background of the opinion that inflation’s stickiness could mean that there actually may not be any rate cuts at all in 2024. While it would be wrong to say that this view is moving into the mainstream, you don’t need to dig very deep into financial media any more to find it. Higher for longer, as they say.
But in a world that seems to automatically correlate the narrative of “interest rates up = stocks down” and vice-versa, it’s sometimes easy to forget that investors had no issue with high interest rates back in the 1990s, when stocks went on a record run. During that decade, the S&P 500 averaged a mouth-watering annual return of 18.2%. Meanwhile, the Fed Funds rate was as high as 8.25% during that period and never once went below 3%. It’s currently 5.375%, so it’s clear than higher interest rates and upwardly mobile stock markets can co-exist.
What cannot co-exist, though, is an upwardly mobile stock market and a meaningful recession. The S&P 500, which closed on Friday at 5,137, was trading solidly below 4,000 much of last year precisely because investors feared a recession. If a proper recession does now occur (albeit much later than expected) then it’s not unreasonable to expect stocks to drop back to that level or below.Put simply: No one currently expects the economy to roll over. But if it does, it could erase the entire rally that’s occurred since October 2023 and then some. That’s why investors must continue to watch economic data closely and recognize rising slowdown risks if they emerge so that they aren’t blindsided by any sudden market volatility. That’s what I try to do all week and report back to subscribers each Sunday.
OTHER NEWS ..
Pointless Exercise .. The utter futility of those stupid end of year predictions that no-one should take any notice of was highlighted by the fact that five Wall Street firms have already raised their forecasts for the S&P 500, which is up 7% to start the year after rising 24% in 2023. Last week alone, Piper Sandler, UBS and Barclays boosted their targets. Two firms — Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and UBS again — have already adjusted their guesses upwards twice since December.
So Long, EV .. Apple is canceling a decade-long bid to build an electric car, abandoning one of the most ambitious projects in the history of the company. According to Bloomberg, Apple made the disclosure internally on Tuesday, surprising the nearly 2,000 employees working on it. The decision to ultimately wind down the initiative is a bombshell, ending a multibillion-dollar effort called Project Titan that would have vaulted Apple into a whole new industry. The tech giant started working on a car around 2014, setting its sights on a fully autonomous electric vehicle with a limousine-like interior and voice-guided navigation. But now its all over.
It’s Really Hard To Get A Car Loan .. Access to auto credit hit the lowest point since August 2020, with the approval rate for loans down 1.6 percentage points year-over-year. With borrowers struggling to make their monthly car payments, banks are responding by tightening credit standards.
This state of affairs is freezing out buyers with lower credit scores who can’t afford a large down payment, while even Americans with healthy finances are having more trouble than usual securing loans. And for dealers, it means many potential customers have struggled to get approved for loans in recent months, which is dragging down sales.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Core technical indicators remain supportive of the long-term market uptrend despite shorter-term inconsistencies that may leave the advance vulnerable in the coming days and weeks.
Over 50% of Large Cap stocks are within 2% of their one-year highs. That’s an astonishingly high reading. In the Small Cap universe, this reading is less than 20% and, in an ideal world, that needs to shift higher to fully re-energize the rally. However, as risk appetite eventually expands, and/or investors have more and more difficulty finding attractively-priced Large Cap stocks, Small-Caps are likely to start receiving more love from the buyers.
A near-term pullback in stock prices driven by short term traders booking profits would not be at all surprising here but it is technically unlikely that such a pullback would develop into more than a 3%-5% decline in the S&P 500 and the medium/longer term technical path of least resistance remains very much to the upside.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The big news this week comes on Friday with the latest Jobs Report for February. Estimates are for a gain of 200k payrolls and an unchanged unemployment rate at 3.7%. Before that, we will get some insight from the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) on Wednesday. The consensus forecast is for 8.9 million job openings on the last business day of January, which would be down slightly from December.
Still a few stragglers left to report Q4 2023 earnings such as Target, Costco, CrowdStrike, Broadcom, Kroger and Campbell Soup.
The European Central Bank will announce its interest rate-setting decision on Thursday and is expected to leave things unchanged.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
It is trendy to believe that spending your money on experiences is more valuable than acquiring stuff. This fails to capture the full story. Our ‘stuff’ can be extremely important, even defining who we are.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) - up 2.5% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: Eli Lilly, UnitedHealth Group) - down 1.0% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 0.8% last week, is up 7.9% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time closing record high (03/01/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 2.8% last week, is up 2.6% so far this year and ended the week 15.1% below its all-time closing record high (11/08/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 0.1% last week, is up 2.6% so far this year and is up 14.1% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.90%, one month ago: 6.63%, one year ago: 6.65%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of a technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 66%, one month ago: 70%, one year ago: 40%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 73%, one month ago: 73%, one year ago: 53%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 47% (44% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 32% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 21% (26% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 26 (Bullish by 18 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on March 20th?
Yes .. 5% probability (2% a week ago)
No .. 95% probability (98% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 25% probability (8% a week ago)
No .. 75% probability (92% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.625% (implying three rate cuts), one month ago: 3.875% (implying six rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.53%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.25%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.41% to 0.39%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
There was only one name on Wall Street’s lips last week; chipmaker Nvidia, the last of the Magnificent Seven stocks to report Q4 2023 earnings on Wednesday evening. The first part of the week was spent in fear of the firm failing to meet strongly-enhanced expectations. Thursday was one big Nvidia-inspired celebratory party after it blew through those expectations and markets spent Friday nursing a quiet post-celebration hangover. The net outcome was yet another up-week for most Large Cap U.S. stocks.
The week began on Tuesday following the Presidents’ Day holidaywith Big Tech dragging the whole stock market ecosystem lower and away from its all-time highs. With Wall Street breathlessly awaiting earnings and outlook from Nvidia, the so-called most important stock on the planet, up by 220% in the last twelve months and responsible for about a third of the total stock market gains so far in 2024, for confirmation that the chipmaker could meet expectations that were now sky-high, there was a sense that there was very little room for disappointment - that almost whatever the company’s earnings looked like, it was always likely to be a letdown vs. the now-astronomical expectation level brought about by market AI-mania.
As a result, the prices of Nvidia’s fellow big dog stocks also fell, anticipating a possible across-the-board “sell the news” reaction to the earnings report, since any signs that the AI boom may be slowing could lead to a big reversal in the stock price, so traders were understandably nervy. The price of Nvidia fell almost 4.5% on the day.
More of the same on Wednesday, as frenzied speculation about Nvidia’s upcoming report that night dwarfed almost everything else, even the rather downbeat minutes from the most recent Fed rate-setting meeting which seemed to confirm that officials are going to tread very carefully on interest rate cuts. Stocks fell at the outset and spent most of the session in the red before a late charge higher got prices back to pretty much flat by the close.
In the end, of course, we needn’t have worried as all fears of any disappointment failed to materialize. After the closing bell, Nvidia shattered even those absurdly raised expectations, delivering yet another jaw-dropping sales forecast, anticipating an amazing $24 billion in revenue this quarter. Even the most wildly optimistic of Wall Street estimates had been for about $21 billion. Results for the last quarter of 2023 also blew decisively through what had been anticipated. As Barron’s put it, “Nvidia is selling shovels in a gold rush”.
Predictably, stock markets responded by going on a massive rocket ride on Thursday, needing to completely reverse its caution from earlier in the week. Nvidia stock surged, increasing the company’s value by $277 billion in just six and a half hours to almost $2 trillion. The S&P 500 ripped higher, breaking through its recently-achieved record all-time high within the first ten minutes of trading. The tech-heavy NASDAQ-100 did even better, soaring to within a hair’s breadth of its own all-time record high which dates back to November 2021. Markets held on to those gains all day as the bulls celebrated the Nvidia report and bought up pretty much everything else they could lay their hands on as well.
Stocks struggled to follow through on a rather more sober Friday, with Big Tech in particular losing a little steam after the previous day’s powerful rally. The S&P 500 barely budged, while still posting a win for the week, although its Small Cap cousins lost ground across five days.
There’s little that Wall Street loves more than to come up with a clever new word for something. Previously, the current economic situation had always been described as Goldilocks, i.e. just right. After last week’s Nvidia-driven new leg higher in stock prices, a new term is being coined to describe what is even better than Goldilocks .. “Platinumlocks”. I’m not sure that one will stick.
But it’s indicative of the enormous level of optimism on Wall Street right now. The Fed is like a stern pastor warning from the pulpit about the need for patience and temperance on interest rate cuts, but the stock market just doesn’t want to listen and keeps slugging from the AI punchbowl, even while at the same time acknowledging that its overly-optimistic assessment from as recently as the beginning of this year of the timing and extent of interest rate cuts is now probably dead and buried (seven rate cuts in 2024??? Ha!!! .. the latest most likely projection is now for just three and the market-driven probability of any cuts at all before June is now only 8%, see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below).
The fact is that, to bring this rally to a crashing halt, actual news now needs to not just be disappointing, but outright bad because the current positive momentum in this market is just so strong. For inflation data, for example, to be powerful enough to challenge the bullish momentum, it has to show not just that inflation has stopped falling (as was in fact implied in the data earlier this month) but that it is rising again, because that will challenge the very idea of any upcoming rate cuts.
And we simply aren’t there right now, so the almost inevitable short-term over-bought pause or pullback that we are likely to experience in the next week or two probably will not represent any kind of meaningful turnaround in the upward trend.
OTHER NEWS ..
Joining The Club .. Amazon is finally joining the famous Dow Jones Industrial Average. With the caveat that the Dow Jones is a stupid index (I never pass up on an opportunity to repeat this), the e-commerce giant will replace Walgreens Boots Alliance in the benchmark index of just 30 U.S. stocks. The change will go into effect prior to the open of trading on Monday, February 26th.
Finally! .. Phil Collins was top of the charts, ironically singing about another day in Paradise, the last time the Japanese stock market as measured by the Nikkei Index last reached a new all-time high of 38,915 at the end of December 1989 .. until last week when, over 34 years later, that level was finally surpassed. This came in spite of the fact that we are only a week removed from learning that the country had fallen into a technical recession.
European stocks, as measured by the Stoxx Europe 600 Index also joined the Nikkei and the S&P 500 in the U.S. in making new all-time highs, boosted by strong performances in 2024 from Dutch chip equipment maker ASML Holding NV, Danish drugmaker Novo Nordisk A/S, German software giant SAP SE and French luxury goods manufacturer LVMH.
The Never-Ending Story .. The U.S. government shutdown clock is ticking (yet again!). Without another short-term spending bill or passage of four key appropriations measures, the government will stumble into a partial shutdown on this coming Friday, March 1st and will then completely run out of money and turn out the lights a week later on March 8th.
The Senate reconvenes after a recess on Monday (but it has to deal with the impeachment articles against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas before anything else) and the House doesn’t get back to work until Wednesday. Expectations are for yet another kick-the-can-down-the-road decision, especially with the March 8th deadline involving $1.2 trillion in spending. The appetite for a political fight on the issue from the wackier corners of the Republican party seems a little more muted this time around.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
This weekly review monitors the latest level of both the Fear and Greed Index and also the % of stocks above 50 day and 200 day moving averages (see below). These are important in assessing the technical state of the market. Here’s how they stand ..
The currently elevated level of the Fear and Greed Index of 78, comfortably in the Extreme Greed zone suggests there are risks of a negative shift in sentiment resulting in a potentially sizable but probably temporary pullback in the broader stock market like we saw at times in 2023. However, the Fear and Greed Index can hold high and low levels for long periods during a strong trend in the market, which helps offer another degree of confirmation in favor of that underlying trend. And until we see a break down through the early February low reading of 63, optimistic sentiment will continue to support the bull market.
Both the 50 day and 200 day readings in the % of S&P 500 stocks above moving averages remain comfortably above their important 50% levels which means the majority of S&P 500 constituents remain in technical uptrends. The 200 day is the more reliable indicator of the two and while it is off the 2024 highs, it is steady and not in free fall like it was during last year’s two notable pullbacks.
A number of sectors are trading into resistance or reaching upside targets, meaning that the odds of a broader market pullback occurring in the near term is on the rise, but the market’s primary long term uptrend appears to be breathing normally with probabilities favoring further highs in the months ahead.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Among the companies reporting their Q4 2023 earnings this week are Best Buy, Macy’s, Lowe’s, Zoom Video Communications, Salesforce, eBay, Anheuser-Busch, Snowflake, Baidu, Paramount, Beyond Meat, American Tower, TJX, Monster Beverage, Six Flags Entertainment, First Solar, Workday, Urban Outfitters and Domino's Pizza.
The economic-data highlight of the week will be possibly the most important inflation reading (because the Fed says so); the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index for January. The consensus estimate is for a year-over-year gain of 2.8%, which would be down from a 2.9% rise through December.
We will also get the second estimate of three for Q4 2023 Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“I never used to understand how billionaires could believe things that seemed so idiotic. How can you be so successful and so misguided at the same time?”Nick Magiulli answers his own question, using nonsense drivel courtesy of Bill Ackerman, Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Sherwin Williams) - up 2.7% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - down 0.7% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.0% last week, is up 6.9% so far this year and ended the week 0.6% below its all-time closing record high (02/22/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 2.4% last week, is down 0.4% so far this year and ended the week 17.6% below its all-time closing record high (11/05/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It fell 0.3% last week, is up 2.6% so far this year and is up 15.4% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.77%, one month ago: 6.69%, one year ago: 6.50%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of a technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 59%, one month ago: 73%, one year ago: 42%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 70%, one month ago: 69%, one year ago: 56%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 44% (42% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 30% (31% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 26% (27% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 18 (Bullish by 15 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on March 20th?
Yes .. 2% probability (10% a week ago)
No .. 98% probability (90% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 8% probability (37% a week ago)
No .. 92% probability (73% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.375% (implying four rate cuts), one month ago: 3.875% (implying six rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.26%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.34% to 0.41%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. The lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
After having risen for 14 of the last 15 weeks, the S&P 500 fell a smidge last week. It basically went on a wild ride to nowhere, driven mostly by messy economic data. There were two signals that inflation isn’t dying as quickly as markets (and the Federal Reserve) would like and there was also a sign that the prolific American consumer may finally be starting to close their wallet a little, all of which combined to hurt stocks, causing one index to have its worst day in years. Yet somehow the week also managed to contain more new all-time highs for Large Cap U.S. stocks.
Markets started out on Monday just as they had ended the previous Friday, although on lower volume - perhaps not that surprising on the day after the Super Bowl, when an estimated 16 million Americans skipped work. The result was at first another straight march higher but then, with the 5,050 level within sight for the S&P 500, nerves finally set in ahead of the following day’s retail inflation report. Traders decided that they wanted to maybe take a little off the table, being that many of them have been making some pretty big bets on the inflation-down/stocks-up narrative already this calendar year. Most indexes sank back and ended up down a touch for the day except for the Russell 2K Small Cap index which was having a moment, up almost another 2% on the session.
When it came out pre-market on Tuesday morning, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation caught Wall Street off guard and took a sledge hammer to stock prices. Core CPI rose 0.4% in January, climbing the most in eight months for a year-on-year rate of 3.9%. Both these data points were higher than expectations and stocks charged headfirst into a buzzsaw, plunging at the open and continuing lower all day.
This was the S&P 500’s worst reaction to a CPI release since September 2022. The NASDAQ-100 and the Russell 2K Small Cap index did even worse, the latter crapping out nearly 4% on the session, its worst day in years and bringing its recent short run of outperformance to a crashing halt.
Treasury yields soared, pushing bond prices lower as the reality seemed to finally hit home that there are now not going to be any interest rate cuts in March and very possibly not in May either. Those market-driven probabilities quickly tumbled to just 7% and 33% respectively. The deemed-most likely interest rate at the end of the year rose to 4.375%, a mere 1.0% lower than now, implying just four rate cuts in 2024 (which finally almost matches what the Fed has been consistently saying since November) as opposed to the market consensus expectation just over a month ago of as many as seven rate cuts this year.
There was something of a knee-jerk snap reversal though on Wednesday, as stocks clawed back a decent portion of Tuesday’s heavy losses as the apparent disgust that inflation had actually dared to pause its rapid downward decline wore off a little in something of a re-think of the need for the previous day’s freakout. The S&P 500 regained the 5000 level but stalled there as stocks ended the day priced almost exactly where they had closed on Thursday of the previous week. Rate cut probabilities recovered a little, too.
Most of the time American consumers can be firmly relied upon to spend lots of money that they don’t have on lots of stuff that they don’t need. But, in another piece of rather surprising economic data, we learned on Thursday that Retail Sales broadly declined last month, indicating that usually turbo-spending Americans finally took a breather. The value of retail purchases in January decreased 0.8% from December, its biggest drop in nearly a year.
Markets reacted by stumbling aimlessly around for much of the day, before Wall Street finally decided that recovering from Tuesday’s over-reaction was more important than running scared from some possibly temporary Retail Sales disappointment and stocks ended the day higher again with the S&P 500 back in all-time closing record high territory.
Next up on Friday morning was the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers. The core number for January climbed 0.5% from the prior month and 2.0% from a year ago - both exceeding expectations and acting as something of a confirmation of Tuesday’s rough retail inflation number. Wall Street’s knee jerked yet again and the recovery rally stalled and the S&P 500 floated back down again to end the week about half a percent lower than where it started it.
I said in a recent report that if the probabilities of an interest rate cut in May fell far enough, then “look out below”. That’s what we saw on Tuesday, when the market-driven probability of such a cut fell below 50% on its way to crumbling further to eventually represent only a one-in-three chance by Tuesday’s closing bell.
Indeed an intriguing new narrative began to slowly and quietly emerge last week, initially restricted to the outer fringes of the financial media - but which moved into the mainstream when repeated on Bloomberg TV by somewhat-respected former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, who said; “There’s a meaningful chance — maybe it’s 15% — that the next move is going to have be upwards in rates, not downwards. The Fed is going to have to be very careful.”
That scenario coming true would horrify Wall Street which has taken stocks on an almost unbroken powerful upward journey since late October of 2023 based primarily on the unshakeable assumption that interest rates were imminently moving lower. While there has maybe been a little disappointment surrounding the timing of such cuts, the idea that they will arrive sooner or later as the Fed’s next move remained totally unchallenged in public until last week.
It will take another couple of cycles of data releases to either establish a new alarming inflation trend or to show that last week’s data was just a bump in the road before we know if this rather frightening narrative will either take hold or fall silently into the (overflowing) garbage can of financial pundit hot takes that simply never come to pass.
OTHER NEWS ..
Sorry, What Did You Say? .. Ride-hailing provider Lyft had a bumbling, chaotic week. The firm saw the price of its shares soar 67% in after-hours trading on Tuesday after releasing results that showed projected earnings jumped by 11% and included a prediction that margins were set to expand this year by an eye-watering 500 basis points (5.00%). But less than an hour later, company CFO Erin Brewer came out and said that in fact the company is actually expecting margins to expand by 50 basis points (0.50%), with a company spokesperson later attributing the extra-zero mistake to a “clerical error” .
Lyft’s rather annoying CEO David Risher did himself no favors by going into lamentably transparent spin mode on TV, casually saying it was “my bad” , acting like he had just spilled someone’s beer or something. He also attempted to minimize the issue by suggesting that it was only a case of just “one zero in a press release.” (false: the error also appeared in multiple documents and was repeated over again on the earnings call before eventually being corrected).
Rumors began to swirl (denied by Risher) that the misinformation was a result of the firm having used AI to generate its earnings report and associated documentation. By the time pre-market trading opened the following morning, the price gain had fallen all the way back to just 17%. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is quite correctly investigating the incident.
Gloomier And Gloomier ..The economic picture around the world darkened as both Japan and the UK fell into technical recessions last week. Adding to the gloom, the European Commission said it expects weaker economic growth across the EuroZone bloc in 2024 and 2025 — bad news for its largest economy, Germany, which is already stagnating economically as well as suffering from increasing political and social turmoil. Of course, these only add to the woes produced by a constantly worsening economic and financial situation in China.
Nice Place You’ve Got Here .. If a waterfront estate in Naples, FL sells for anywhere close to its $295 million asking price, it will set the record for the America’s most expensive residential real estate sale ever. Financier John Donahue paid a paltry $1 million for what was then a four-acre tropical retreat at the far edge of a peninsula in the exclusive Port Royal neighborhood, according to The Wall Street Journal. He continued to purchase nearby land, ultimately acquiring 60 acres.
A nine-acre portion of the property with 1,650 feet of waterfront, three houses and its own dock for a private yacht is being offered for sale. The homes include an 11,500-square-foot house with six bedrooms and a screened-in pool; a 5,500-square-foot residence with five bedrooms and an outdoor pool and another 5,800-square-foot structure added in 2013.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Historically speaking, the upcoming four weeks on the calendar haven't been great during the fourth year of presidential terms. In fact, they have generally been pretty piss-poor for stocks.
The S&P 500 index had enjoyed a “start-stop” rally for months, characterized by rapid upside moves followed by longer periods of sideways consolidation, notably absent any material pullbacks or drawdowns. Until last Tuesday, when the hot retail inflation print gave at least a short-term win for the bears, before a swift reversal the next day mitigated most of the damage.
While it appeared that weeks-long negative divergences in shorter term indicators finally gave way to a meaningful decline in the major indexes, longer term trends continue to support a positive big-picture view. This was emphasized when most technical core indicators survived the mid-week fireworks to remain intact and stay in their uptrends dating from last October.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
U.S. stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday for Presidents’ Day. It will be another busy week of earnings reports once Wall Street returns, the really big news being Nvidia's results on Wednesday.
Also reporting this week, among others: Home Depot, Walmart, Medtronic, Moderna, Intuit, Block, Warner Bros., Etsy, Newmont Mining, Palo Alto Networks, Rivian, Keurig Dr. Pepper, Analog Devices and Booking Holdings.
Nerdy Federal Reserve-watchers (guilty as charged!) will be closely watching the release of minutes from the Fed’s last interest rate setting meeting on Wednesday. Officials left interest rates unchanged at the meeting, but may possibly have discussed conditions for lowering them later in 2024.
Unlike last week, the calendar is quiet for meaningful economic data this week.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Dave Ramsey’s dangerous nonsense needs to finally be called out for the bad advice that it is. Here we go at last.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 2.7% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) - down 2.6% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price fell 0.5% last week, is up 5.1% so far this year and ended the week 0.5% below its all-time closing record high (02/15/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 1.0% last week, is up 0.5% so far this year and ended the week 16.9% below its all-time closing record high (11/05/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 0.1% last week, is up 2.9% so far this year and is up 15.2% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.64%, one month ago: 6.60%, one year ago: 6.32%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
The 50-day moving average of the S&P 500 remains above the 200-day. This is a continued indication of a technical uptrend.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 62%, one month ago: 70%, one year ago: 49%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 69%, one month ago: 65%, one year ago: 61%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 42% (49% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 31% (28% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 27% (23% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 15 (Bullish by 26 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on March 20th?
Yes .. 10% probability (16% a week ago)
No .. 90% probability (84% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 37% probability (61% a week ago)
No .. 73% probability (39% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.125% (implying five rate cuts), one month ago: 3.875% (implying six rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.29%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.31% to 0.34%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
We are entering the year of the dragon on the Chinese calendar which it appears traditionally signifies good luck, prosperity, strength and abundance. Although the Chinese stock market is not really the place to look for much in the way of prosperity or abundance right now, U.S. stock markets are hot, hot, hot and that didn’t change as we saw yet another week of gains across the board with a significant new milestone reached by the S&P 500.
Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell reiterated in an interview with CBS’s 60 Minutes that aired last Sunday evening that the Fed likely won't be ready to cut interest rates at its next meeting in March, stating that “the danger of moving too soon is that the job’s not quite done”.
There was absolutely nothing new here, this was no more than an exact echo of what he had told us all a few days earlier at his press conference, but Treasury bond yields still jumped and stocks opened lower on Monday, with Small Caps leading the downward charge and the decline accelerated later in the day when two of Powell’s influential Fed colleagues came out and said exactly the same thing. Fed-speak is clearly getting organized and in synch.
This continued on Tuesday when Fed officials were once more out in force, reiterating the “higher for longer” company line that it would be a mistake to cut interest rates too soon. If this Fed-Speak was intended to take some more froth out of stock markets, it worked for a while and Monday’s decline resumed. Later in the day, however, the dip buyers jumped back in and both the Large and Small Cap indexes actually closed the day with small gains.
Concerns about the viability of embattled New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) intensified as it was cut to junk by the Moody’s credit rating agency on Wednesday. Equivalent lending institutions around the world, heavily exposed to their own mostly toxic commercial real estate markets and not helped by contagion from the implosion of the Evergrande Group in China, are clearly experiencing problems too.
There was also a continued drumbeat of Fed-Speak throughout the day from even more central bank officials expressing satisfaction with inflation trends but playing down the likelihood of imminent interest rate cuts. Even so, driven by steadier market interest rates and some more decent earnings reports, Large Cap and tech stocks shrugged it all off and started to become magnetically drawn towards “S&P 5k”, the crowded option strike price and psychologically important 5,000 level for the S&P 500 index, getting to within five points of the symbolic milestone.
But like a teenager who is too nervous to approach their crush at the high school dance, the S&P 500 spent Thursday frequently getting up close to the 5k level and then backing away before finally managing to land a brief kiss a minute or so before the closing bell. It couldn’t quite hold on to close above the line but still managed its ninth all-time record high of 2024. Interestingly, this session saw the Russell 2K Small Cap index suddenly bounce spectacularly from recent under-performance, up by over 1.5%.
S&P 5k was breached again on Friday morning and this time the index held above that level for the rest of the session, recording its first ever >5k close at 5,027 and obviously a tenth new all-time high of the year - and it’s only early February. The mood was cheered by the release of the annual audit and report card on the accuracy of the last twelve months’-worth of retail inflation data which confirmed the strong downward trajectory that we’ve been seeing for many months now.
The Russell 2K Small Cap index followed through on its strong showing from the day before and was by far the best-performing corner of the market again. This is very positive for stocks in general as it demonstrates a widening of the breadth of stocks participating in the rally and a closing of the gap between Large and Small Caps by means of the little guys moving higher rather than by the big guys moving lower.
Oh, and by the way, Microsoft became the largest company in history by market value, closing the day with a market capitalization of $3.125 trillion, surpassing the previous biggest which was Apple at a mere $3.09 trillion.
2024 has started out with lots of noise .. mixed messages from the first Fed meeting (yes to rate cuts - but not yet), its officials publicly taking to the airwaves, conflicting earnings reports from tech giants, bizarre jobs data, all-time high records tumbling all over the place, Elon being Elon, a return of small bank concerns amid what is clearly becoming a commercial real estate crisis around the world, China’s situation going from bad to worse, Putin chatting cozily with U.S. media and so on and so forth.
For all the noise and strange nuance that we are seeing, this bullish mantra is still intact: No hard landing, Fed cutting rates sooner rather than later, inflation declining, earnings growth holding up. For this rally to reverse meaningfully, one of those four statements must be proved false and despite some rather head-scratching recent data, none of it was enough to even begin to do so, and as such, the S&P 500 continues to reach fresh all-time highs, pulling all the other indexes higher with it.
But we may be approaching an inflection point and it’s very important to cut through the noise right now and focus solidly on what matters, the four core drivers of stock prices at the moment:
solid economic growth
a Fed embracing the idea of interest rate cuts
falling inflation
growing corporate earnings
Again, until one of those drivers is shown to be broken (and they will be at some point, they always are) then momentum can easily carry this market even higher. And yes, stocks are ripe for a 10%+ correction as and when one or more of the factors are disproved, but we are certainly not there yet.
The burden of proof lies entirely with the bears and so far they’re not accumulating enough evidence to stop this rally, aside from a few overbought pullbacks from time to time. The risks are plentiful, but momentum can be a hard trend to fight.
OTHER NEWS ..
In Other Words .. Job cutshave hit Big Tech and other sectors, and while it’s hard to sugar-coat a job loss if you’re on the receiving end, companies are tying themselves in linguistic knots trying to come up with cringe-worthy corporate-speak around the subject. Examples of phrases being used to describe layoffs are: “right-sizing”, “org changes”, “a simplified operating model”, “fitting our organization to our strategy" and my personal favorite, the vomit-inducing “an involuntary career event”.
For some reason that is beyond the comprehension of anyone with the intellect of a jellyfish or higher, executives and HR professionals at these firms still somehow seem to believe that if they use language like this, people won’t get as upset. I wonder how that’s working out? I know what effect even just writing this had on me.
USA! USA! USA! .. New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium will become the first arena in history to have staged both a Wrestlemania and a World Cup Final when it hosts by far the biggest sporting event in the world (think over 70x the number of Superbowl viewers) in 2026 following the announcement last week from soccer’s world governing body, FIFA, of the location schedule. The Azteca Stadium in Mexico City is to host the opening game of the U.S.-Canada-Mexico-hosted tournament.
Despite its supposed three nation format, however, it’s going to be very U.S.-centric. All the games at the business end of the month-long competition (quarter-finals and beyond) will take place in the States and there are actually just as many games taking place in Texas as there are in Canada.
Moving Lower .. Israel receivedits first-ever sovereign downgrade as Moody’s Investors Service lowered its credit rating, citing the impact of its ongoing military operation in the region on the nation’s finances. The country was cut to A2, the sixth-highest investment grade and on a par with Poland and Chile. Moody’s also changed the outlook on Israel to negative.
Damned If They Do .. Respiratory illnesses have lingered above the national baseline since November, according to the CDC. Far from staying home to halt the spread of germs, American workers are now reporting to their desks at the highest rates in almost four years. In kind of a no-win situation, workers who are ill are being shamed by bosses for calling in sick or by colleagues if they show up contagious.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The 5,000 level in the S&P 500 had always been seen as a potential ceiling, a resistance level that could slow down or even halt any rally. Now that the level has been breached, however, it could well become a potential floor, a support level that can pause or even reverse a decline in the index while it is >5k. That’s how these “big number” milestone levels work.
But if the index rolls over and quickly falls back meaningfully below 5,000, its power as a resistance level the next time to block the index as it tries to break back above it is massively enhanced as we will have already witnessed a “failure” at this key point and the task will become harder with every subsequent failure to maintain >5k. For the bulls, staying above the 5,000 watermark for the next few weeks at least is important.
The next two or three weeks are critical from a technical standpoint for other reasons too. Since 1945, the S&P 500 has risen in price in both January and February just 29 times. Historically, every single time this happened, the S&P 500 recorded a positive full-year, rising an average of 24% in those years vs. the typical average increase per year of 10%.
But history also says that stocks are now in one of the seasonally weakest months of the year, with an even weaker February often seen in election years. And we are sitting on a monster rally and history also suggests that we should not be surprised if there is a period of digestion.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The wave of earnings reports continues this week, with more than 60 S&P 500 companies scheduled to report Q4 2023 results including some biggies like Coca-Cola, Cisco Systems, Applied Materials and Deere. We more than halfway done with this earnings season, with about 60% of S&P 500 index companies having already announced their results.
The economic highlight of the week comes on Tuesday with the release of January’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation. Expectations are for a 2.9% year-over-year rise, which would be half a percentage point less than in December.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Everyone is looking for the best funds, but what about the other end of the spectrum? Which fund investments have been the top wealth-destroyers?
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) - up 2.9% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy. Southern Co.) - down 2.0% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.4% last week, is up 5.5% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time closing record high (02/09/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 2.5% last week, is down 0.7% so far this year and is 17.8% below its all-time closing record high (11/05/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 0.1% last week, is up 2.7% so far this year and is up 15.0% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.63%, one month ago: 6.66%, one year ago: 6.12%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 65%, one month ago: 81%, one year ago: 69%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 70%, one month ago: 73%, one year ago: 69%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
Crossovers between the 50-day and the 200-day are also considered to be significant: for example, a new technical uptrend is considered to be in place when the 50-day percentage crosses above that of the 200-day.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 49% (49% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 28% (26% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 23% (25% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 26 (Bullish by 24 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on March 20th?
Yes .. 16% probability (20% a week ago)
No .. 84% probability (80% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 61% probability (71% a week ago)
No .. 39% probability (29% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 4.125% (implying five rate cuts), one month ago: 3.875% (implying seven rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.14%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year fell from 0.33% to 0.31%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It was a very busy week with some huge earnings reports painting a somewhat mixed but on balance positive picture, a Fed interest rate meeting that pushed back hard against Wall Street interest rate cut expectations, a sudden resurrection of regional bank concerns and an astonishing Jobs Report that indicated that the economy is on fire right now. All this kept traders on their toes, but the final outcome was yet another positive week for U.S. stocks which ended Friday back at more new all-time highs.
Coming off a weekend of increased Middle East tension and the apparent final confirmation of the demise of China’s largest real estate firm, Evergrande Group, markets were quite subdued for most of Monday before a late flurry of optimism about falling Treasury yields and the Federal Reserve’s upcoming interest rate call pushed stocks higher and right back into all-time record closing high territory once again.
Monday’s late-day gains were broadly maintained on Tuesday, but things were generally very quiet and barely changed ahead of some mega-tech earnings after the closing bell and the Fed interest rate-setting meeting the following day.
When they were released, the big Q4 2023 earnings reports were kind of so-so. Microsoft posted its strongest revenue growth since 2022 with the help of AI products, but its cloud performance disappointed. Alphabet/Google beat estimates for sales and profits, but its ad revenue came in shy of the forecast.
The knee-jerk reaction to these earnings on Wednesday morning was a sharp selloff in tech and tech-adjacent stocks, and this accelerated when the Fed statement was released after interest rates were left predictably unchanged that included the killer line that Fed officials “do not expect it will be appropriate to reduce the target range until it has gained greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2%.”
A definition of what “greater confidence” meant was notably lacking, but the message was clear; yes, there will be likely be interest rate cuts at some point in 2024, but there’s definitely no rush. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell very much stuck to this script in his press conference, calling an interest rate cut at the Fed’s next meeting in March “not the most likely case”. You could almost hear the stock market groaning in disappointment as stocks continued to cascade lower all afternoon, with the tech-heavy NASDAQ having its worst day in over a year.
Thursday was a day of digestion as Wall Street re-litigated the previous day’s Fed decision and Powell’s words, eventually deciding that things weren’t so bad after all. It was also a massive day for earnings and we got another mixed bag. Apple shares fellafter a deepening slump in China overshadowed sales from elsewhere beating estimates, but Amazon reported very strong sales and Meta/Facebook shares jumpedin extended trading after its sales forecast beat estimates. The firm will also pay its first ever dividend in March. Stocks rebounded from Wednesday’s dismal showing, with all the indexes jumping more than 1% on the day.
Everything seemed to change on Friday morning when, pre-market, we got a stunning blowout Jobs Report. Payrolls increased by 353k in January, that’s double what had been expected. While the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 3.7%, wage growth exploded higher as well to 4.5% year-on-year, up from 4.1% in December. Numbers for prior payroll reports were even revised higher, suggesting that this is something more than just a one-off blip.
This kind of data is an interest-rate-cut-killer, as it points to the fact that a victory lap over the final conquest of inflation may possibly be premature. Going in to the Jobs Report, the market-derived probability of lower interest rates by the end of the March Fed meeting was 42% and by the May meeting was 94%. Within minutes of the report coming out these probabilities had plunged to 16% and 68% respectively (before recovering slightly later) and the number of expected 0.25% rate cuts for 2024 fell from six to five (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below).
Stocks, which had been poised to roar higher when the market opened on the back of those solid earnings reports the previous evening from Meta/Facebook and Amazon, wobbled at first in the face of the jobs data and, for a while, it felt like a bad-tempered stock market was going to knock prices down as a result of the sense that the imminent and frequent rate cuts to which it feels so entitled were slipping away from its grasp.
However, disappointment about a diminishing imminent rate cut likelihood was ultimately overwhelmed by a sense of bullishness about the ripping economy and what it could mean for corporate earnings. Stocks took another leg higher led by the tech and communications services sectors (and Meta/Facebook in particular ,which soared 20%) and even deeper into all-time record high territory by Friday’s close.
It’s just plain hard be a seller of stocks at the moment in an economy that is experiencing massive expansion, collapsing inflation, vibrant labor markets, a consumer that seems incapable of not spending shitloads of money, mostly solid (and sometimes spectacular) earnings reports from the biggest companies and a very healthy technical setup.
March (and possibly even May) interest rate cuts may now be off the table after that staggering Jobs Report, but there is a developing sense that exactly when the interest rate cuts begin is becoming less important than the total extent of cuts by the end of the year, both in terms of how many cuts there’ll be and how much lower interest rates will be on New Year’s Eve than they are now.
I am now monitoring all these numbers for you in the FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below and even after the shocks of last week, we are still looking at a market expectation of a total of five interest rate cuts in 2024. If we see nothing in May’s meeting, that would mean a 0.25% cut at each and every one of the remaining Fed meetings for the rest of the year.
It sounds like a tall order, but consider this. When you look at the inflation rate using more recent data with a six month look-back (then annualized) rather than the more traditional straight one-year look-back, the Fed’s measure of annual inflation is now down to 1.9%, already below its target of 2%.
That says to me that the Fed could already be in a position to cut interest rates and just needs to be sure that the recent inflation data is not some kind of short term head fake that could suddenly reverse. The startling Jobs Report demonstrated the wisdom of the Fed’s slow and cautious approach, which gives policymakers flexibility. But ultimately the cuts will come.
OTHER NEWS ..
70% Inflation .. Tickets to attend the Super Bowl in Las Vegas next weekend are the most expensive ever for the event, going for an average $9,815 each so far, according to reseller TickPick. The price is 70% more than last year’s game, which was held in Arizona. This year’s attractive location is being cited as the biggest factor driving demand. It’s the first NFL championship to be held in the city. The previous record average ticket price was $7,046 in 2021 in Tampa, Florida, when the game was played at a sharply reduced capacity due to the pandemic. Many rooms at Las Vegas hotels, including the Bellagio and the Fontainebleau, are priced at well over $1,000 a night for the weekend.
Global Growth Optimism .. The International Monetary Fund (IMF)raised its forecast for global growth this year on the strong economic expansion in the U.S. and fiscal stimulus in China. The world economy will grow 3.1% this year, up from the 2.9% seen in October, the institution said last week. Tighter central-bank policy to fight inflation and public-spending cuts in some countries are among the reasons why growth is expected to be slower than in the two decades before the pandemic, when it averaged 3.8%.
But, given the scale of the COVID price shocks and the flurry of significant interest-rate hikes that followed, the IMF suggested things could have gone much, much worse. “The global economy continues to display remarkable resilience, and we are now in the final descent toward a soft landing with inflation declining steadily and growth holding up” , the report said.
Bad Memories .. Markets were jolted on Wednesday when the share value of New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) plunged by almost 50% after shocking Wall Street with a “game-changing” Q4 2023 earnings miss and slashed its dividend from 17 cents to 5 cents. To blame were huge loan-loss provisions (many of them commercial real estate-related) after asset purchases resulting from its acquisition of Flagstar Bank which itself acquired failed Signature Bank last March and a frighteningly high delinquency rate on some of the bank’s loans.
These developments are a reminder that the regional bank problems that rocked financial markets last year may not yet have been fully resolved. Loans related to the increasingly troubled commercial real estate sector still account for more than 28% of assets at small banks. Traders looking around for a possible next shoe to drop were apparently starting to focus on Valley National Bank on Friday.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
It is apparent that while multi-month trends in the technicals are still favorable, short-term indicators continue to show more selective Demand than is ideal with mild lingering Supply. Last Wednesday’s precipitous fall illustrates the risk of what can suddenly happen during such a lengthy and pretty powerful rally. However, Buying Power remains dominant above Selling Pressure emphasizing the firm grip that buyers maintain on the market.
The number of S&P 500 stocks trading above their 50-day moving average (MA) fell below the number trading above their 200-day MA. This was primarily the result of a bad Wednesday in the market last week, but such a crossover is generally considered to be a sign of some short term pullback risk (see below).
Also of concern is the return last week to meaningful Large Cap outperformance of Small Cap, indicating a reduction in the breadth of the advance.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Another flood of Q4 2023 earnings reports will keep us busy next week. 100+ S&P 500 companies are scheduled to report including Eli Lilly, PepsiCo, McDonalds, CVS, Caterpillar, Uber, Disney, Spotify, Ford, Paypal, BP, Alibaba, Simon Property Group, ConocoPhilllips, Expedia, Tyson Foods, Chipotle and Take Two Interactive.
The main economic-data highlight of the week will be Friday's release of the annual revisions to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Those could affect the previous five years of inflation data, and may have implications for Federal Reserve policy on interest rates.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Could you retire at 30 years old with $10 million? Nick Magiulli takes a deep dive.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 3.3% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 0.9% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.4% last week, is up 4.0% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time closing record high (02/02/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 0.8% last week, is down 3.1% so far this year and is 19.9% below its all-time closing record high (11/05/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 0.5% last week, is up 2.6% so far this year and is up 14.1% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE
One week ago: 6.69%, one month ago: 6.62%, one year ago: 6.09%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of last Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE
One week ago: 75%, one month ago: 75%, one year ago: 71%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE
One week ago: 71%, one month ago: 77%, one year ago: 71%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
Crossovers between the 50-day and the 200-day are also considered to be significant: a technical uptrend is considered to be in place when the 50-day percentage is above that of the 200-day and a technical downtrend when it is below.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months)
↑Bullish: 49% (39% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 26% (35% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 25% (26% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 24 (Bullish by 13 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on March 20th?
Yes .. 20% probability (48% a week ago)
No .. 80% probability (52% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s following meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 71% probability (88% a week ago)
No .. 29% probability (12% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 3.875% (implying six rate cuts), one month ago: 3.625% (implying seven rate cuts)
All data based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of the market close on Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.51%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (3.99%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the higher 2-year and the lower 10-year rose from 0.19% to 0.33%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
A steady stream of earnings reports last week, along with continued positive economic and inflation data, set up the stock market for another shift higher. But it all felt a bit forced, with small, incremental gains rather than solid leaps forward. There’s a sense that markets may have hit an air pocket in their upward glidepath as we wait to see if rising Large Cap stocks can pull the rest of the market up with them.
Even in the face of deepening hostilities in the Middle East and a resulting firmness in the oil price, Monday saw the S&P 500 add to its all-time high set the previous Friday on optimism surrounding upcoming tech earnings later in the week and momentum from the previous Friday’s big gains. The session was also notable for an impressive turnaround in recently-beaten-down Small Cap stocks which quite handily outperformed their Large Cap cousins on the day.
On Tuesday, stocks remained stuck in a narrow range as Wall Street tried to drink from a firehose of very mixed earnings reports from many of the big dogs, while also keeping an eye (ok, maybe just half an eye) on the New Hampshire Republican primary that day. The indexes still managed to creep a little higher, thereby setting yet another all-time record closing high in the S&P 500.
It was a similar story on Wednesday. After a bubbly start, stock prices retreated and spent most of the day hugging the unchanged line. Again, some decent earnings provided some support but the feeling is developing that it’s going to take something shiny and new to trigger the next meaningful leg higher. With GDP and PCE inflation coming out before the end of the week, there was a chance that we might just get that, but no-one seemed particularly willing to bet big-time on it.
Nevertheless, a teeny gain on Wednesday for the S&P 500, helped partly by the European Central Bank (ECB) holding interest rates steady over there, saw yet another new all-time record closing high for that index. The NASDAQ-100 also climbed for the fifth successive day, reflecting renewed optimism in the tech space.
By the time the market opened on Thursday, we had learned that Tesla suffered dismal revenues and profits in Q4 2023 relative to expectations along with a gloomy projection of “notably slower growth” in 2024. Wall Street was distinctly unimpressed and trashed the stock by 12% in a matter of hours.
However on a more general note, we also saw the first of three estimates for Q4 2023 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) come in way higher than expected at a 3.3% growth rate vs. the expectation of 2.0% and a rest-of-2023 total growth rate of 2.5%. This sparked something of a rally in stock prices with an increase in optimism about earnings in a much more-buoyant-than-expected economy. Markets still seem convinced that interest rate cuts are coming sometime this year, regardless of economic data.
On Friday, the pre-market release of the Fed’s preferred method of measuring inflation, the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index for December, showed an increase of 0.2% on the month and fell to 2.9% on a yearly basis, a three year low and less than 1% above the Fed’s target rate, keeping the debate alive over whether officials will soon cut interest rates.
The S&P 500 seemed to not really know how to react and just waffled around most of the day. By the close it had slipped less than 0.1% on the day, finally ending its streak of consecutive record-high closes. Focus continued to be on big company earnings reports. Disappointment from Intel got severely punished but on the other hand, American Express’ stock price soared to a new all-time high after strong 2024 guidance and a dividend increase. Despite Friday's less decisive performances, all the major indexes posted weekly advances.
So, what is currently keeping Wall Street traders up at night?
I know I keep saying it, but .. this market is very vulnerable to a substantial decline should economic data start to point towards any kind of a hard landing (which, to be clear, it is not doing right now). That statement is especially true given i) the nearly universal expectation that there will not be a hard landing and ii) the stock market, especially in Large Caps, is very stretched on a valuation basis at these current prices.
It’s still too early to draw any conclusions about growth from this earnings season, mega-cap tech earnings will still dominate the narrative. So far though, non-tech earnings and guidance are echoing what we’re seeing in the broader data; that economic growth is definitely moderating.
We are starting to witness cracks and some significant divergences within the group of so-called Magnificent Seven stocks that have driven the rally over most of the last year. For example, Nvidia is up over 20% so far in 2024, but with last week’s terrible performance, Tesla is now down 26% over the same period. That’s more than $200 billion of the company’s value wiped out in four weeks.
Also of some concern is the fact that the probability that interest rates will be lower than now after the May Fed meeting last week slipped below a 100% certainty for the first time (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below). Futures market probability also now favors an end-of-year Fed Funds interest rate of 3.875% which is 1.50% lower than where we are now, but still a quarter of a percent higher than where the expectation was just the previous week. I have now started tracking this important market assumption each week in FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below.
The stock market was described by one analyst last week as being like a runaway train. He added that a runaway train usually does go off the rails in the end, but it can travel a long way before that happens.
OTHER NEWS ..
Bounce Back? .. We just ended a two-year barren spell without a new all-time record high in the S&P 500 index. In 13 of the 14 prior instances the index went at least a year between record highs, it has been higher a year later (the exception was 2007, which followed a seven year drought). The average gain over the ensuing twelve months was 14%, which is about three percentage points higher than the average annual return for the S&P 500 over the last hundred years.
India Goes Fourth .. India’s stock market capitalization has overtaken Hong Kong’s for the first time as the former’s growth prospects and policy reforms make it an investor darling just as global capital pours out of China. The combined value of shares listed on Indian exchanges reached $4.33 trillion as of Monday’s close, versus $4.29 trillion for Hong Kong, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That makes India the fourth-biggest stock market in the world, behind only the U.S., China and Japan.
Toyota’s EV Skepticism ..Toyota Motor Corp. ChairmanAkio Toyoda says he believes battery electric vehicles will reach only a 30% market share at most - with the rest taken up by hybrids, hydrogen fuel cell and fuel-burning cars. He pointed out that, with a billion people in the world living without electricity, limiting their choices and ability to travel by making expensive cars simply isn’t the answer. “Customers, not regulations or politics, should make that decision,” he said.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Both price action and the technical body of evidence now reflect a returning split between the largest stocks and the rest of the pack. In terms of Demand, it will be important to monitor which segment (large or small) reverses direction to meet the other. In relative strength terms to the S&P 500 Large Cap index, the Russell 2K Small Cap index fell to its lowest levels since late November, giving back all of the relative outperformance that it had realized in December.
As is always the case when markets are at all-time highs, there is no overhead technical resistance for the market, so the psychological 4,900 level in the S&P 500 will be key to watch to the upside, as the round number could offer an excuse for some traders to take profits while it is also a high-volume, important options market strike price.
Patience is advisable, with broad-based Demand still more likely than not to ultimately return sometime soon. Heightened Demand selectivity and an uptick in Supply has been evident since the calendar flipped to 2024. Investors will be looking for a return of these trends to the very different trajectories they were on in the last weeks of 2023, when they were reflecting a healthy market condition that was able to generate new all-time highs.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week will be jam-packed on both the macro and micro fronts. There's a Fed policy meeting, January jobs data, and earnings reports from about a hundred S&P 500 firms to look forward to, including from some the biggest companies in the world.
The Federal Open Market Committee will announce its interest rate decision on Wednesday afternoon, followed by a press conference with Fed Chairman Jerome Powell. Wall Street is forecasting no change at this meeting, but will be paying close attention to any clues about when the central bank might begin cutting rates later in 2024.
Q4 2023 earnings reports this week include those from Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet/Google, Amazon, Meta/Facebook, Exxon Mobil, Pfizer, General Motors, Chevron, Mastercard, Starbucks, AMD, Qualcomm, Merck, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Nucor and Boeing.
On Tuesday, we get to see the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) which is expected to show 8.7 million job openings on the last business day of December.
But the economic-data highlight of the week will be the January Jobs Report on Friday morning. Estimates are for a gain of 175k payrolls and an unemployment rate of 3.8%.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
How does the historical rate of return on a real estate investment stack up against other assets?
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) for the second week in a row - up 5.1% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 2.0% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 0.9% last week, is up 2.6% so far this year and is 0.1% below its all-time closing record high (01/25/2024)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price rose 1.7% last week, is down 2.4% so far this year and is 19.2% below its all-time closing record high (11/05/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 0.1% last week, is up 2.1% so far this year and is up 14.8% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.60%, one month ago: 6.61%, one year ago: 6.13%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 74%, one month ago: 88%, one year ago: 74%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 69%, one month ago: 75%, one year ago: 69%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
Crossovers between the 50-day and the 200-day are also considered to be significant: a technical uptrend is considered to be in place when the 50-day percentage is above that of the 200-day and a technical downtrend when it is below.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 39% (40% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 35% (33% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 26% (27% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 13 (Bullish by 13 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s meeting this week (on January 31st)?
Yes .. 3% probability (3% a week ago)
No .. 97% probability (97% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s meeting on March 20th?
Yes .. 48% probability (49% a week ago)
No .. 52% probability (51% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 88% probability (100% a week ago)
No .. 12% probability (0% a week ago)
Where is the Fed Funds interest rate most likely to be at the end of 2024?
One week ago: 3.625%, one month ago: 3.625%
Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.54%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.04%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell from 0.24% to 0.19%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It took just over two years, but we finally have ourselves another new all-time record closing high for the S&P 500 which was reached on Friday when the index closed at 4839.81. The U.S. stock market really is an incredible piece of work. Never in history has it ever once failed to recover from all of its losses, no matter how huge, and then go on to set yet another new record high. If you are investing for the long term, you need to bottle this moment and remember it the next time stocks are down large and everything seems hopeless.
After yet another long weekend, during which geopolitical tensions around the world continued to escalate and Trump won big in Iowa, Wall Street traders returned to the battlefield on Tuesday morning and were soon confronted by Fed Governor Christopher Waller saying that, while the state of the U.S. economy was “almost as good as it gets”, he was unconvinced that higher inflation had been killed and that fact could impede progress towards the frequent and extensive interest rate cuts that the market expects the Fed to provide, starting as early as March. Stocks glided lower, especially when officials from the European Central Bank (ECB) started making similar noises.
We learned on Wednesday that U.S. consumers in December kept on spending like drunken sailors. The Retail Sales data came in hot, up 0.6% from November’s spending and 5.6% higher than a year ago, providing more signs that the economy is continuing to grow and just adding to the “inflation is not dead”side of the ledger.
The probability of a Fed interest rate cut by March, which had been as high as over 80% as recently as the previous week and was basically a 100% certainty at the beginning of January, reacted by collapsing to pretty much that of a coin-flip.
Stocks dropped further in response and it’s not hard to figure out why. The high probability of at least one interest rate cut by March this year was a major contributor to the December melt-up and we’re seeing some of those gains being given back now that that particular probability is deemed to be much lower.
The skies brightened on Thursday, however, and all the stock indexes moved in a northerly direction, helped partly by a very optimistic outlook from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM), which supplies chips to Apple and Nvidia. Also, the Senate passed yet another Continuing Resolution, atemporary spending bill to avert a partial U.S. government shutdown this weekend, which once again just kicks the can down the road, this time to March 1st (partial shutdown) and March 8th (lights out).
A calmer mood settled over markets on Friday with the sense that, yes, recent hot economic data readings might well defer interest rate cuts beyond initial expectations, but they also imply that whatever meaningful recession fears remain for 2024 may be unfounded and that can only be good for future corporate earnings.
After a sluggish start, stocks ripped higher after lunch on the back of this new interpretation of the Retail Sales numbers and also a buoyant-again tech sector which is helping to offset some of the growing caution elsewhere with a new burst of AI optimism following TSM’s earnings report, to erase the week’s losses and we finally reached a new all-time record closing high for the S&P 500. Hurrah!
Asset prices in the U.S. are priced for perfection in what is a very crowded trade and that’s a concern. Markets are still assuming that even if the Fed doesn’t cut on January 31st or March 20th, it will definitely cut on May 1st and that the current expectation of a total of at least six rate cuts in 2024 will, more or less, stay intact.
But we are getting closer to the wire whereby if the Fed doesn’t signal at least one interest rate cut either before or at the May meeting then markets could well freak out. No rate cuts through May will mean that Wall Street will have to accept that it is wrong about its aggressive expectations for Fed easing that underpinned the entire Q4 rally. Pull that punch bowl away and you could be looking at a 10-15% decline in stock prices or more.
From a market standpoint it doesn’t matter so much when the rate cuts start, as long as the expectation for a lot of policy easing (let’s call it > four interest rate cuts) remains intact. Ironically, a real risk for this market is that the Fed does exactly what it currently says it will do and only cuts two or, at a real stretch, three times.
So far, there is no budging on the expectations of a rate cut before or at the May meeting as they remain intact at a 100% probability. However, where that number goes, stocks also will go and, in some ways, this is the most important data point to keep track of right now. As long this probability remains at or very close to around 100%, stocks will be able to continue to move higher. But if doubt sets in and we see the reading fall to like 75% and continuing lower, then look out below.
Consequently, I am now adding tracking for the May meeting probability to this report each week (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below).
OTHER NEWS ..
Home Sales Have Collapsed .. Sales of existing homes crashed last year to the lowest level in nearly three decades, after elevated mortgage rates and a lack of homes for sale shut out buyers. The number of existing home sales tumbled 19% in 2023 from the prior year to 4.09 million, the National Association of Realtors said on Friday. That total was lower than during the sub-prime crisis of 2007-08 and the lowest full-year level since Montell Jordan told us that this is how we do it in 1995.
After two years of soaring home sales that started during the pandemic as people sought more space and new locations, the housing market skidded to a halt in mid-2022 as rates began to rise again and the supply of homes for sale stalled at very low levels. But there are some signs of life as mortgage rates ease to their lowest levels since last May and it’s possible that last year represented a bottom for sales activity.
Recession Indicator? .. I don’t normally take too much notice of regional economic activity readings, but the New York Fed Manufacturing Index is prized by some as an early tip-off each month on where the manufacturing sector in the country as a whole is heading. The sight of this index dropping deep into negative terrain for January – a truly horrible reading and the lowest since the COVID was raging in the Spring of 2020 – convinced some observers to warn that the jig is up and a US recession is now near. Maybe, but it’s hard to make a high-confidence call based on one indicator, especially when it is one regional manufacturing indicator that draws only on survey data from manufacturing executives in the NY Fed’s district.
Remember When Chinese Stocks Were Supposed To Be The Future? .. Chinese shares sank to the lowest in nearly five years after another bout of weak economic data. The largest brokerage in China is said to have suspended short selling for some clients in mainland markets following the rout in Chinese stocks at the start of the year. State-owned Citic Securities made the move after so-called window guidance from regulators. A Hong Kong gauge of Chinese stocks has notched up its worst week since March, while global passive funds are adding to the pressure by joining in with the selloff in another sign of deteriorating investor confidence.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The market’s primary uptrend appears intact, although recent increased selectivity in Demand favoring Large Caps makes markets increasingly vulnerable to another short-term dip in prices. This phenomenon should not perhaps be unexpected as it was Small Caps that led the charge in those turbo-charged final weeks of 2023.
The number of S&P 500 stocks trading above their 50-day and 200-day moving averages declined modestly last week (see below) despite the continued gains and a new record in the index at the same time. At this time, this is not an alarming drop in the measures of market breadth, however if we were to see the number of stocks trading above their 50-day MA cross below the number of stocks trading above their 200-day MA, that could be a warning sign that breadth is deteriorating which typically precedes market pullbacks.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
While it is doubtless comforting to know that the collective economic genius of the likes of will.i.am, Mick Jagger, Idris Elba, Yo-Yo Ma, Nas Daily, Chieftess Puttany and Jared Kushner were all able to attend the pointless circle jerk and expense account-fueled journalist jolly-up that is The World Economic Forum in Davos and get to self-importantly lecture the rest of us little people on how we should live our puny lives, we can all get back to some actually relevant business news content this week now that a massive fleet of private jets has flown all the hypocritical, self-aggrandizing narcissists back home to their out-of-touch bubbles.
Q4 earnings season heats up, as more than 70S&P 500 firms report their results including Netflix, Tesla, Visa, IBM, Proctor and Gamble, Johnson and Johnson, Verizon, GE, Intel, AT&T, American Express, Comcast, Lockheed Martin, United Airlines and American Airlines.
The most-watched economic data release this week will be the one used by the Fed to determine its inflation assumption and thereby its interest rate policy; the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index for December and more importantly, the Core PCE Price Index, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, which will come out on Friday. The core number is expected to show this measure of inflation at 3.0% annualized.
Also out this week will be the first of three estimates for Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth in Q4 2023.
The European Central Bank (ECB) will publish its monetary policy decision on Thursday and is expected to keep interest rates in the Eurozone unchanged.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
What did the stock market teach us in 2023? Quite a lot, it seems.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) for the second week in a row - up 4.3% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 3.4% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.3% last week, is up 1.5% so far this year and ended the week at a new all-time closing record high
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 0.2% last week, is down 4.1% so far this year and is 20.7% below its all-time closing record high (11/05/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It fell 0.1% last week, is up 1.8% so far this year and is up 14.2% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.66%, one month ago: 6.67%, one year ago: 6.16%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 82%, one month ago: 88%, one year ago: 69%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 73%, one month ago: 73%, one year ago: 64%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market trend, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point. Readings above 90% or below 15% are extremely rare.
Crossovers between the 50-day and the 200-day are also considered to be significant - in a positive sense when the 50-day percentage moves above that of the 200-day and in a negative sense when it crosses the other way.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 40% (49% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 33% (27% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 27% (24% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 13 (Bullish by 25 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s next meeting on January 31st?
Yes .. 3% probability (5% a week ago)
No .. 97% probability (95% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s meeting on March 20th?
Yes .. 49% probability (81% a week ago)
No .. 51% probability (19% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now following the Fed’s meeting on May 1st?
Yes .. 100% probability (100% a week ago)
No .. 0% probability (0% a week ago)
Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.54%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.08%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rose from 0.18% to 0.24%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk regarded to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
This was the week that Microsoft edged past Apple to reclaim the title of the world’s most valuable company. The software giant now has a valuation of $2.89 trillion, slightly ahead of Apple at $2.87 trillion.
The week also saw the US and UK launch joint airstrikes against rebel targets in Yemen after a spate of attacks on merchant vessels in the Red Sea. The rebels responded by vowing to continue their attacks. An absolutely vital commercial shipping artery becoming a war zone is pushing both oil and shipping costs higher, raising fears of a widespread knock-on effect on global inflation and, as such, the evolving situation is being monitored by markets.
Following the news that congressional leaders had apparently struck a bipartisan deal over the weekend on top-line spending levels for the current fiscal year, thereby lessening (but not entirely eliminating) the chances of any imminent government shutdown, markets reacted favorably on Monday and stock indexes shifted higher. Boeing and some airline stocks took a hit, however, after its 737 Max 9 planes were grounded for inspection following an incident the previous week.
A mostly sideways Tuesday followed, with light losses for the S&P 500 and light gains for tech stocks. One one hand, the World Bank’s growth forecasts for the U.S. and E.U. this year were upgraded, helping to offset a lower-revised outlook for the Chinese economy. On the other hand, some pretty wild, apocalyptic talk from Trump’s lawyers in a DC courtroom served to remind markets how much volatility is probably going be generated by domestic politics in this election year.
Wednesday was mostly uneventful with the importantinflation data due out the following day and Q4 2023 earnings season kicking off the day after. Trader positioning in advance of these events was cautiously optimistic with most indexes creeping a little higher, although the recent Small Cap retreat continued. The day’s news flow was dominated by the anticipation and eventual confirmation of the SEC’s rather reluctant approval of multiple Bitcoin ETFs (see OTHER NEWS below).
When it came out on Thursday morning before the opening bell, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of inflation showed that the pace of retail price increases actually picked up a little at the end of 2023. Overall headline CPI rose 0.2% from November to December and the 3.4% annualized rate was higher than the previous month’s 3.1%.
However, the more important Core CPI reading, which excludes energy and food costs, rose 0.3%, the same as for the prior month and is up 3.9% from a year ago, a slight decline from the 4.0% annualized rate of a month previously. The biggest contributors to inflation in December were increases in the prices of used cars, clothing and especially homeowners’ and auto insurance.
The stock market initially decided to interpret the report as another sign of a potential speed-bump for its hopes of imminent and frequent interest rate cuts and prices declined across the board. A late rebound, however, saw the indexes finish pretty flat on the day.
On Friday, there was somewhat more positive inflation news from the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers which actually fell 0.1% for the month and ended 2023 up just 1.0% from a year earlier, as compared to 2022’s total increase of 6.4%.
Some of Wall Street’s biggest banks kicked off the Q4 2023 earnings season on Friday and a common theme seemed to be that last year may have been the peak for their biggest source of revenue, net interest income (the difference between what they pay to borrow money and earn to lend it). In keeping with the preceding few days, the stock market session was a bit of a yawn and prices eked out marginal gains, despite continued ongoing declines for stocks of any companies related to the airline industry.
It’s not a very complicated market right now. Unlike the past several years, there aren’t a lot of influences on stocks and bonds at the moment as there are really just three of them driving markets in the short term:
Fed policy expectations and resulting anticipated economic growth (hard landing/soft landing)
inflation
corporate earnings
In the near term, the stock market has an expectation problem and the early year cooling-down hasn’t been so much because something bad happened and instead just because the first data points of 2024 didn’t quite validate the extremely aggressive (and possibly unrealistic) market expectations for the year.
But just because the outlook isn’t perfect, it doesn’t mean it still can’t be good. It’s possible to be constructive on the rest of the year, but also feel that Wall Street needs to get over some short-term jitters. Some indigestion is probably to be expected following the kind of shocking rally in the S&P 500 index that we just experienced.
OTHER NEWS (BITCOIN ETF EDITION) ..
Green Light .. After a false start on Tuesday brought about by crypto hackers hijacking the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) X/Twitter account and putting out false information, the SEC did reluctantly vote on Wednesday to clear the way for the first U.S. exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that hold Bitcoin to be sold to the public, allowing mainstream investors to finally be able buy and sell the digital currency as easily and transparently as stocks and mutual funds in a fully regulated environment. This followed years of resistance from regulators based on concerns about rampant fraud, misrepresentation and manipulation in crypto markets (concerns that will not disappear following this SEC decision).
Until now, everyday investors who wanted to buy and sell digital currencies have had to either:
take their chances incurring hefty transaction fees trading on risky and user-unfriendly crypto exchanges (a good number of which were operated as criminal frauds with little or no asset protection for investors) and with limited confidence that their assets would not simply disappear or be stolen, or
purchase high-cost products that only approximately tracked the price of Bitcoin in much less direct ways, like through futures contracts, which are far from ideal.
All eleven ETF applications filed by asset managers including BlackRock, Fidelity Investments, ARK Investment Management, Invesco, WisdomTree, Bitwise Asset Management, Valkyrie and Grayscale Investments were green-lighted to list as early as the following day.
SEC chairman Gary Gensler, who openly admitted that his hand was forced in this decision by a recent court ruling, didn’t hold back when he was asked how the Bitcoin ETFs will compare to existing ETFs that track, say, the price of gold ..
“I’d note that the underlying assets in the metals ETFs have consumer and industrial uses, while in contrast Bitcoin is primarily just a speculative, volatile asset that’s also used for illicit activity including ransomware, money laundering, sanction evasion and terrorist financing.While we approved the listing and trading of certain spot Bitcoin ETF shares today, we did not approve or endorse Bitcoin. Investors should remain cautious about the myriad risks associated with Bitcoin and any products whose value is tied to crypto.”
Ouch.
I will shortly be publishing an article on this platform about how these new Bitcoin ETFs work, what they mean for Bitcoin investment and what my advice would be when it comes to using these new products.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 in 2024 has notably retraced back to where it was before the last Fed meeting, effectively erasing the gains earned since then. Key technical support levels have held, however, indicating that the first couple of weeks of the year have represented nothing more than a pause in the upward trajectory of stock prices that began in late October.
It would be helpful to see the S&P close at a new all-time closing high (currently 4,797 - so only 14 points away from Friday’s closing price), to confirm the uptrend. The early 2022 intra-day high of 4,819 will also be in focus.
It was interesting to note that NASDAQ volume surged from a two-year low in October 2023 to a nearly three-year high last week. A bull market needs the fuel of incoming new money, so this bodes well for future gains. It is important to recognize that major market declines, last witnessed early in 2022, are typically preceded by months of ongoing deterioration, not of renewed strength.
The percent of stocks above their moving averages (see below) remains high (healthy) and the percent of stocks 20% or more below their one year highs remains low (also healthy).
Through sustained and significant gains in key technical indicators over the course of several months, the long-term market outlook has stabilized and brightened. In this context, a potential short term market pullback need not yet be feared.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
U.S. stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday for Martin Luther King Day, but it will be a busy week of Q4 earnings reports once Wall Street returns. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Charles Schwab, Prologis, Schlumberger, State Street and Travelers are among the highlights.
Retail Sales data and the monthly Consumer Sentiment survey come out this week as does information on the latest Housing Market Index and Existing Home Sales.
This week also sees the annual self-indulgent gathering of out-of-touch narcissists in Davos, delighting in the sounds of their own voices which will, as usual, generate lots of self-congratulatory backslapping and nothing of any use to normal human beings.
ARTICLE(S) OF THE WEEK ..
Two for the price of one this week, I think these two important articles are inter-linked.
Both sides of the coin. The bull case for stocks and the bear case outlined by the always insightful Barry Ritholtz. Take your pick. Or don’t.
“Anything can and will happen in the short run. The long run is where compounding happens. Success in the stock market is reserved for patient people.” If you are aged below 45 you need to read this.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) - up 4.4% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 2.4% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. Its price rose 1.7% last week, is up 0.3% so far this year and is now 0.2% below its all-time closing high (01/03/2022)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. Its price fell 0.3% last week, is down 3.7% so far this year and is now 20.3% below its all-time closing high (11/05/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 0.2% last week, is up 1.05% so far this year and is up 13.2% over the last three years.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.62%, one month ago: 6.95%, one year ago: 6.33%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 87%, one month ago: 89%, one year ago: 76%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 75%, one month ago: 72%, one year ago: 62%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their more sensitive 50-day (short term) and less sensitive 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 49% (49% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 27% (28% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 24% (23% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 25 (Bullish by 26 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting (January 31st)?
Yes .. 5% probability (4% a week ago)
No .. 95% probability (96% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting (March 20th)?
Yes .. 81% probability (64% a week ago)
No .. 19% probability (36% a week ago)
Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.55%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (3.84%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell from 0.35% to 0.18%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The happy clappy days of late 2023 already seemed like a bit of a distant memory at times last week. This was the worst four-day start to a calendar year across all stock and bond asset classes since Shakira indicated that she was available whenever, wherever in 2002.
The chance to enjoy a second long weekend in a row seemed to have sobered Wall Street traders up a bit. Upon re-entering the arena on Tuesday, they appeared to have reined in some of their more outlandishly optimistic interest rate cut expectations and the market kicked off 2024 by battering 2023’s winners.
In fact, the NASDAQ had its third worst opening day this century as limits on semiconductor exports to China and questions about iPhone demand particularly weighed on tech stocks during the session.
Things didn’t get much better on Wednesday when we learned that the number of available jobs in the U.S. decreased pretty much in line with expectations to 8.79 million, the lowest level since early 2021, according to the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS).
The superstar stocks of 2023 were further punished by profit-takers as the publication of the minutes from the last Federal Reserve rate-setting meeting failed to show any hint of interest rate cuts being planned for the first part of 2024. Indeed the minutes showed that officials “reaffirmed that it would be appropriate for policy to remain at a restrictive stance for some time until inflation was clearly moving down sustainably”.
That’s Fed-speak for “Easy, tiger!” aimed at those who are anticipating an absolute orgy of interest rate cuts this year. The futures market probability of interest rates being lower than they are now after the Fed’s March meeting quickly plummeted from 87% the previous Friday to 65% by Wednesday’s close (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below).
Things stabilized a bit on Thursday morning as attention began to turn toward the consequential Jobs Report the following day. But prices drifted lower again in the afternoon for a third straight day of declines to start 2024 with NASDAQ stocks and Small Caps once again being hit hardest.
When the Jobs Report dropped on Friday morning, it further undermined the case for imminent interest rate cuts. It indicated that the road to 2% inflation may be longer and bumpier than markets were anticipating. 216k jobs were added last month, way higher than analysts had predicted. Unemployment remained stuck at 3.7% as the labor force shrank. Year-on-year wage gains are now at 4.1% vs. the 3.9% analyst estimate and far above the 3.5% that the Fed believes is consistent with its 2% inflation target.
Instead of freaking out, however, stock markets rather uncharacteristically chose a more nuanced and balanced response to the report, recognizing that while the continued high employment levels and wage growth do pose risks in the form of an inflation rebound potential and the resulting possible deferral of those long-awaited interest rate cuts, the report also paints a rosy picture of an economy in good health and one in which corporate earnings may flourish and stocks finally enjoyed their first up-day of 2024, albeit a pretty modest one.
As I have repeatedly emphasized, the market’s assumptions coming into 2024 were aggressively optimistic and it is how events unfold versus these high expectations that will determine how stocks and bonds trade in Q1, which is why every major economic data point (jobs, GDP, inflation and retail sales) is important right now because 1) they’ll directly influence rate cut expectations but also 2) because of the implications for soft vs. hard landing.
If the economy is going to slow in a disturbing manner, we will likely see evidence of it during this first quarter via 1) the data and 2) Fed-speak (especially following the January meeting) from central bank officials. If rate cut expectations are significantly dialed back, that’s going to be a real problem for stocks.
Earnings season is looming with results starting next Friday. If reports in aggregate disappoint - particularly when it comes to the big dogs of the market - that will be another headwind.
And finally, brace for politics. It will become a larger and larger influence on markets as the year goes on. For Q1 2024, as well as risk of an imminent politically-motivated government shutdown (see OTHER NEWS below), the first Republican primary is almost upon us. Trump could have the nomination secured by Super Tuesday (March 5th), although his legal difficulties will likely not be resolved by then.
None of these issues will for sure derail any stock rally in 2024 even with such rich valuations, indeed there are a lot of reasons to think that stocks could very well end up having an exceptional year. But we all need to be aware that there is certainly potential for some meaningful bumps in the road along the way resulting from all this stuff and possibly other as-yet-unknown factors that could always emerge.
OTHER NEWS ..
Silly Stat .. I’m not one for drawing big conclusions from small samples, but here goes anyway .. According to Barron’s; since 1950, there have been 28 instances in which the S&P 500 has lost ground over the first four trading days of the year. On average over those 28 occasions, the index has still managed to finish the year in positive territory, up by 1.6%, but that figure badly trails the S&P 500's typical performance; in all years since 1950, the index has gained an average of 9.3%. The good news? Past performance, as they say, is no guarantee of future results.
Not Looking Good On The Shutdown Front .. President Biden’s top budget official said that she is now very concerned the US government will partially shut down later this month with the lights fully going out in February as Congress and the White House remain deadlocked over border security and spending levels. “I’m typically optimistic. Don’t mark me down as optimistic this morning,” Shalanda Young, director of the Office of Management and Budget, said on Friday.
Financial markets seem to be remarkably unconcerned about this issue at this point, although I suspect that may change soon if there’s no progress. Conventional wisdom says to not worry too much about these skirmishes as politicians will always find some sort of fudge or compromise at the last minute to kick the can further down the road, just as they did twice in 2023.
But this time it may just be different. The chances of a January 20th shutdown are high because, caving to pressure from the crackpots on the Burn-It-All-Down wing of his party, new Republican Speaker Mike Johnson has expressly vowed not to pass any more stop-gap pending bills this time. It remains to be seen if he is a man of his word.
Happy New Year Elon - not! .. The turning of the page on the calendar has done nothing to signal an upturn in the fortunes of beleaguered billionaire Elon Musk.
First, a Fidelity valuation put X/Twitter as being worth 72% less now than on the day Musk massively overpaid for it. And that’s before any real effect has been felt of the very public advice he gave that his advertisers should “go fk themselves” following their boycott in response to their ads on the platform being placed next to the proliferation of Nazi-style posts and other violent hate speech found all over the platform and Musk’s open endorsement of anti-semitic sentiments.
Even one of the very biggest “white whales” of social media influencers and online personalities, MrBeast, has now dropped X/Twitter as a platform, essentially saying that it was an irrelevance and that his presence there was simply not worth his time and effort any more.
Last Tuesday, we learned that Tesla has officially lost its title as the world's top seller of electric cars. BYD, a Chinese automaker, delivered 526,409 cars in Q4 2023, comfortably surpassing Tesla's 484,507.
It was then announced on Friday that the company has had to recall all of the 1.6m vehicles that it has ever sold in China due to problems with the driver-assistance system that have increased the risk to passenger safety.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Technical measures of Supply and Demand, breadth and participation, demand intensity and momentum have all moved to multi-month (and in some cases multi-year) highs of late. This is not just true in the U.S. by the way, stock markets are at new highs all around the world. It is extremely rare for the stocks to hit a top, turn around and begin to decline at a time when all these indicators are so robust.
Even at the end of a difficult week, an astonishing 437 of the S&P 500 stocks are still trading above their 50-day moving average and 375 above their 200-day (see below).
In an environment at the beginning of the year where there is typically a lot of market “noise”, there is little evidence so far of Demand becoming more selective, let alone any highly-motivated selling of anything beyond 2023’s big winners.
This is the flip side of what we saw in the first half of 2023 when the indexes moving higher was a little misleading as the trajectory was being driven by a small number of champion names. Now, the index declines of early 2024 are similarly misleading in that they, too, are being primarily driven by the downward price movements of pretty much that same small cohort of big name stocks.
We just need to wait for markets to shake off its early-year sillies and for a proper pattern to establish itself. Shouldn’t be long now.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
After a slow start, the news flow intensifies later this week with crucial inflation data followed by the unofficial kickoff of the Q4 2023 earnings season.
On Thursday, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for December will be released and will be closely watched for the latest inflation trends, especially with a (diminishing) number of traders still betting that the Federal Reserve will begin cutting interest rates as early as at its March meeting.
On Friday, big U.S. banks take on their traditional role at the front of the earnings season pack. Bank of America, JPMorgan and Wells Fargo will be among the big names reporting their Q4 2023 results.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
How to completely optimize your vacation days in 2024.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: United Health Group, Eli Lilly) - up 2.3% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - down 4.6% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. It fell 1.4% last week and is now 2.1% below its all-time closing high (01/03/2022)
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. It fell 3.6% last week and is now 20.3% below its all-time closing high (11/05/2021)
DXY, the U.S. Dollar index, is an index that measures the value of the U.S. Dollar against a weighted basket of six other major currencies (the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, the Swedish Krone and the Swiss Franc). It rose 1.04% last week to 102.4
The proprietary Lowry's measure for U.S. stock market Buying Power fell by 11 points last week to 164 and that of U.S. stock market Selling Pressure rose by 9 points to 116over the course of the week.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.61%, one month ago: 7.03%, one year ago: 6.48%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 50-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 89%, one month ago: 80%, one year ago: 42%
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE ..
One week ago: 75%, one month ago: 61%, one year ago: 47%
Closely-watched measures of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below their 50-day (short term) and 200-day (long term) moving averages which are among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 49% (46% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 28% (29% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 23% (25% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 26 (Bullish by 21 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting (January 31st)?
Yes .. 6% probability (17% a week ago)
No .. 94% probability (83% a week ago)
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting (March 20th)?
Yes .. 64% probability (87% a week ago)
No .. 36% probability (13% a week ago)
Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.54%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.02%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year remained unchanged at 0.35%.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
We will all have to wait at least a little while longer for that new all-time record high in the S&P 500 index. Despite teasing us at times during what was a very subdued week, stock prices never quite got high enough to break the record closing level of 4796.56 achieved almost exactly two years ago on January 3rd 2022. This was the first time since 2012 that the S&P 500 had failed to close at a record high at least once during the year, but the index still earned a total return for 2023 of almost 27%.
Wall Street traders came back from the long weekend filled with Christmas cheer on Tuesday, pushing stocks higher again - albeit in a thin volume environment that allowed for prices to drift upwards without needing much conviction behind the move other than just continuing momentum fueled by the fumes of a very impressive last couple of months. The S&P 500 index got to within 25 points of its previous record high.
There was really nothing to report from Wednesday’s snoozer of a session. Stocks spent the day treading water, inching slightly higher but left us still waiting to launch the confetti for that new record high.
Thursday was not much different, a rock bottom-volume journey to nowhere (only two-thirds of the annual daily average number of shares changed hands) with the indexes finishing unchanged on the day and still short of that new all-time record territory.
Stocks sank on the final trading day of the year on Friday, led downwards by the brightest stars of the recent boom, tech and Small Caps. The S&P 500 briefly got to within nine points of its elusive magic number, but ended the day, month, quarter and year at around 4770. Santa Claus departed for another year and there are a few concerns that he may have taken his rally with him.
Typically, the price action in the week before Christmas and then the week between Christmas and New Year can be considered as just noise and not particularly instructive or predictive of anything that’ll move markets in the upcoming year. But I do think that this time we are seeing an excessive amount of complacency and giddy optimism over the festive period and a quickly developing very high-conviction view from Wall Street that corporate earnings are going to look really good in 2024. And really, what is the recent track record of the end of year narrative? It’s not good.
In December 2021, there was universal optimism for the year ahead. Then the S&P 500 hit a new all-time record high on the first trading day of 2022, but it was all downhill from there. The consensus for 2022 was entirely bullish .. and entirely wrong. The Fed was much more aggressive than expected on rate hikes, inflation exploded, growth slowed and the S&P 500 dropped 20%. The stock price of Amazon and Nvidia got cut in half over the course of the year, while Alphabet/Google fell 40% and Meta/Facebook crashed 65%. Meantime, unprofitable tech (the likes of Zoom, Peloton and others) got absolutely annihilated, with shareholders watching their investments lose 80-90% of their value in many cases.
Now, think back a year to December 2022. Investors were despondent and miserable. The S&P 500 was ending the worst year in over a decade and bonds had just experienced pretty much their worst year ever. Thoughtfully constructed, balanced portfolios had taken a beating like never before. The Fed was incessantly hiking interest rates at every meeting, inflation wasn’t breaking and everyone (and I mean, everyone) was convinced that we were facing an imminent recession. The consensus for 2023 was entirely bearish .. and once again entirely wrong. Growth and earnings remained resilient, inflation was broken and the Fed pivoted to a more accommodative stance. Those same stocks that had had the crap kicked out of them in 2022 led the way higher in 2023 which ended up being a bonanza year for the indexes.
Now, in December 2023, the consensus is universally bullish again. Investors seem to passionately believe that an economic soft landing in 2024 is all but assured. The Fed will cut interest rates six times next year, but not because of slowing growth and instead because inflation is about to go into some sort of free-fall. Despite there being numerous geopolitical hot spots, none of them will get materially worse. U.S. politics won’t be a problem (even though it’s an election year and there’s no debt ceiling solution in sight) and despite a potentially slowing economy and margin compression, companies in the S&P 500 will grow earnings by nearly 10% this year. The 5000 mark on the S&P 500 isn’t a matter of “if” , but “when”.
All of those things may well come true. It might be exactly how 2024 works out. It’s just that we need to watch for warning signs that it isn’t and probably brace ourselves for some volatility if that turns out to be the case, since so much of this good news is already baked into the current level of stock prices, leaving markets highly vulnerable to any disappointment.
The plain fact is that there are real, legitimate risks lurking out there in the new year. We can still have a growth slowdown and a recession. Earnings growth can falter as demand slows and margins compress. Geopolitics can easily worsen from here, providing negative surprises, sometimes seemingly out of nowhere. Inflation could bounce back. And around the world, but especially in the U.S., there are going to be elections in 2024 that will be highly consequential and maybe brutally contested (both before and after polling day).
We can expect markets to normalize this week and immediately get to work answering some of these pretty important questions about economic growth, actual vs. expected Fed policy and corporate earnings.
Stay with me in 2024 and I’ll try and make some sense of things for you as we go along. Meantime have a safe, healthy and happy New Year!
OTHER NEWS ..
In such a zzzzzzzzzzzz week, finding any interesting “other news” was pretty challenging. Normal service will be resumed next week.
On the plus side, my latest Quarterly Market Review looking back on financial markets in Q4 2023 should be completed and sent to subscribers by sometime in the middle of this coming week. Keep an eye on your email inbox.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Five technical caution signals that I will be watching for in 2024 that could indicate a market top and act as warning signs for a possible reversal in stock prices (which could still be months or quarters away if they come about) ..
1) Market Breadth.
Participation is often one of the first things to fall away in an equity bull market so if the number of stocks trading above their long term moving average starts to meaningfully decline, that can be an early warning signal of a potential reversal. You can track this reading each week in this report, see % OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE below.
2) Investor Sentiment.
Overly bullish or optimistic sentiment is consistent with a crowded long side of the market and typically precedes market peaks. So a divergence between the broader stock market (still moving higher) and sentiment (beginning to fall) would be a notable caution signal for stocks. You can track sentiment each week in this report, see both the WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENTand theFEAR & GREED INDEX below.
3) Treasury Bill Yields.
Futures are pricing in a March rate cut which is now less than three months away, however the 3-month Treasury Bill yield held steady at between 5.40% and 5.45% for all of December. If we do not see the 3-Month Bill yield begin to move down towards 5% in the coming days and weeks, that will be a negative development for stocks. You can track the state of the yield curve each week in this report, see US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE below.
4) The CME’s Fed Watch Tool.
This is largely a continuation of the previous point, but if the Fed Watch Tool begins to show less rate cuts or rapidly fading odds of a March rate cut (currently 87%), that could be a major headwind for stocks. You can track this reading each week in this report, see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL below.
5) The U.S. Dollar.
The dollar index retreating to multi-month lows in recent weeks has been another tailwind for stocks, so a rebound towards a reading of 103-105 could put some downward pressure on equities.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday for New Year’s Day, with trading for 2024 kicking off on Tuesday morning.
The year gets off to an interesting start with Jobs Week. The latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) comes out onWednesday and is expected to show 8.75 million job openings, which would be a slight increase from a month prior.
Then on Friday comes the Jobs Report for December. Estimates are for a gain of 155k payrolls, versus 199k in November. The unemployment rate is expected to move up fractionally from 3.7% to 3.8%.
This week will also see therelease the minutes from the Fed’s mid-December monetary-policy meeting.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“It was hard to f up too badly in 2023. If you did, you had to go out of your way to do so. Here are some of the ways in which you might have blown the year .. “ Josh Brown nails it again*.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Costco) - up 1.9% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 1.1% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. It rose 0.4% last week, is up 26.6% for all of 2023 (total return) and is now just 0.7% below its all-time closing high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. It rose 0.1% last week, is up 18.8% for all of 2023 (total return) and is now 17.2% below its all-time closing high (11/05/2021).
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power rose by 2 points last week to 173 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure fell by 6 points to 108over the course of the week.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.67%, one month ago: 7.22%, one year ago: 6.42%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE (LTMA) ..
One week ago: 74%, one month ago: 58%, one year ago: 48%
A closely-watched measure of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below the 200-day moving average which is among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 46% (53% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 29% (26% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 25% (21% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 21 (Bullish by 32 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE TOOL ..
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s next meeting (January 31st)?
Yes .. 17% probability
No .. 83% probability
Will interest rates be lower than they are now after the Fed’s following meeting (March 20th)?
Yes .. 87% probability
No .. 13% probability
Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday. Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.60%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (3.84%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell last week from 0.41% to 0.35%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area on the chart shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The final full trading week of 2023 was basically more of the same. With many market participants already in holiday mode, volumes were low but even a rare victory for the bears on Wednesday was swiftly reversed by the bulls. Wall Street seems determined to keep this party going as long as it can.
Last weekend, Fed officials began trying to pour whatever the opposite is of gasoline onto the fire of stock market euphoria. And as the week began, the Fed presidents of Atlanta, San Francisco and Chicago all joined their New York-based colleague in pushing back on the jubilant narrative, emphasizing that it’s a reach to consider interest rate cuts until officials become completely convinced that the economy is firmly on a path back to the 2.0% inflation target. It’s currently close to double that.
But this kind of pushback is just about as meaningful as a Christmas card from your local internet provider if investors keep covering their ears and shouting “We can’t hear you!”and that’s exactly what the stock market did on Monday as indexes like the S&P 500 and especially the NASDAQ-100 continued their relentless climb.
Tuesday was another sea of green across trading screens with Small Cap stocks again stealing the show. All Fed pushback to market giddiness was once again routinely ignored. The stock market seemed absolutely determined to let the good times keep rolling and no chirping Fed presidents saying that perhaps traders may be getting ahead of themselves with interest rate cut expectations were going to stop that from happening.
However, after the closing bell, there was a bit of a gut-punch. FedEx delivered its Q3 results and missed earnings estimates by a mile. It also gave a gloomy forward guidance outlook. This is important as Fedex is sometimes considered to be something of a proxy for business activity in the U.S. economy.
Fedex shares sank as a result on Wednesday. After initially pushing index prices higher yet again, Wall Street finally decided around lunchtime that it was time to take a breather and bank some profits from the recent furious rally. Stocks actually ended up suffering their worst one-day drop in months with all the indexes sinking about 1.5% or more for the session.
In many ways, Thursday started out not dissimilar to Wednesday. A strong morning with prices driving higher on the back of some nice earnings reports was followed by a lunchtime pullback, but this time FOMO-infected buyers and the newly-emboldened BTFD crowd took the opportunity to step back in to the low volume market, partly encouraged by confirmation that Q3 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increased at a seriously impressive 4.9% rate and growing speculative optimism about the following day’s inflation report. By the time the closing bell sounded, most of Wednesday’s losses had been recovered.
Friday was all about the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, the Federal Reserve’s very definition of what inflation actually is. We learned that it barely rose at all in November, increasing by just 0.1% from a month earlier after a downwardly revised 0.1% gain in October. From a year ago, it advanced 3.2%. Indeed, if you look at it just over the past six months, this definition of inflation is running at only 1.9% annualized, actually below the Fed’s 2% target.
This was splendid news for the Fed and appeared to justify their decisions not to raise interest rates at any of their last three meetings, but the central bank still remains cautious. Markets, however, are throwing that caution to the wind and seem pretty much ready to declare victory and job done in the war on inflation. The major indexes were pretty flat on the day, but this was not surprising for a low volume final session before a three-day Christmas weekend.
The stock market has been rallying for one primary reason: Falling Treasury yields (and as a result, lower interest rates). The anticipation of future interest rate cuts has become so strong that it has even helped markets disregard several quite concerning corporate earnings reports.
Astonishingly, following its December meeting, the Fed didn’t just confirm market expectations of rate cuts in 2024, it actually increased them. The Fed itself signaled one more cut than what was realistically expected and it formally signaled rate hikes are over. It essentially abandoned, after just a few months, its whole looming threat of “higher for longer” interest rates.
Since its October 27th low, the S&P 500 has surged more than 15%. So, in the end, the market rallied because the Fed essentially wiped away the whole reason for the sharp drop in stock prices that we experienced from August to October.
Can this rally continue? Yes, but it’s not in the Fed’s hands any more. Markets have aggressively priced in definitely no recession and no meaningful slowdown, but that’s premature. The economy could easily slow and indeed there are some signals that this is already happening.
With its recent positive pivot, the Fed has now fired its final bullet. Frankly, it is no longer able to help markets now if worries about a serious economic slowdown emerge. So close attention to upcoming economic data is absolutely essential for gaining a sense of where the stock market is heading.
OTHER NEWS ..
The Best In The World .. The world’s best performing stockthis year is a South Korean electric vehicle supplier. Shares of Ecopro comfortably beat the rest of the 2,647 member Bloomberg World Index - delivering returns of 571% this year, despite having actually fallen 50% from its peak in July. Last year’s winner PT Adaro Minerals Indonesia, which had a 1,595% gain in 2022, fell 19% in 2023.
The Best, The Worst And The Busiest In The World .. In a survey of nearly 16k travelers at airports around the world as reported by Bloomberg, Muscat International airport in Oman was named best airport in the world. The highest ranked U.S. airport was Minneapolis-St. Paul International which came in at #13. Fresh from spending $8 billion on renovations, New York LaGuardia only placed 70th but still well ahead of New York JFK which finished in 106th place.
The worst airport in the world according to the survey is Banjarmasin Syamsudin Noor International airport in Indonesia, but also gracing the list of the bottom ten airports on the planet were London Gatwick and Toronto Pearson.
The busiest airport in the world remains Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson, followed by Dubai International, Tokyo Haneda and London Heathrow. The world’s busiest international route was Kuala Lumpur <> Singapore. The flagship trans-Atlantic route, London Heathrow <> New York JFK, dropped from fourth place to eighth.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The intensification of Demand in recent weeks has been very promising and is very different from what we saw in 2023’s previous index rallies which generally failed to be accompanied by such a demand expansion. The percent of stocks hitting new one year highs exploded to levels not seen since June 2021, reaching 19% on December 14th.
The greater the number of stocks reaching new highs with the indexes, the more broad-based the Demand intensity is. Contrary to popular belief, markets do not tend to top out when this figure is elevated. Rather, market usually turn down following months of dwindling new highs.
Things having been going berserk in Small Cap world. Just 48 days after hitting 52 week lows, the Russell 2K Small Cap Index hit 52 week highs. That has never happened before in such a short period of time.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday for Christmas and the calendar will be pretty empty.
There will be Home Price Index numbers to look forward to but the earnings calendar is quiet. Q4 earnings season doesn’t kick off until January 12th with results from JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Rich Author, Poor Readers. Try as he might, professional doomer Robert Kiyosaki just can’t seem to get anything right.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 2.2% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 2.1% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. It rose 0.4% last week, is up 25.8% year-to-date (total return) and is now just 0.9% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. It rose 2.6% last week, is up 17.3% year-to-date (total return) and is now 16.9% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power rose by 6 points last week to 171 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure fell by 7 points to 114over the course of the week.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 6.95%, one month ago: 7.29%, one year ago: 6.27%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE (LTMA) ..
One week ago: 72%, one month ago: 55%, one year ago: 48%
A closely-watched measure of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below the 200-day moving average which is among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 53% (51% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 26% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 21% (19% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 32 (Bullish by 32 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be after the Fed’s next meeting on January 31st?
One week ago: 10%, one month ago: 0%
One week ago: 90%, one month ago: 91%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.54%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (3.87%) is for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell last week from 0.53% to 0.41%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Stocks had another terrific week, boosted by the interest rate cut-friendly tone of the Federal Reserve and its Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday. The S&P 500 moved higher for the seventh consecutive week, something it hasn’t done since 2017. The NASDAQ-100 ended the week at a new all-time record high, something that would have seemed unthinkable just a year ago at the end of a catastrophic 2022. The best performing stocks last week, however, were the Small Caps.
Monday saw stocks move higher to further new 2023 highs, with the generic all-encompassing indexes like the S&P 500 following through strongly on the momentum from the end of the previous week on the back of continued hopes for a “bending-but-not-breaking” economy and optimism about the following day’s inflation report. Some profit-taking following recent surges in tech and Small Cap stocks caused the performances of the NASDAQ-100 and the Russell 2K indexes, respectively, to lag somewhat over the course of the session.
Before the opening bell on Tuesday, we learned that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation is starting to show a few signs of stickiness, notably in areas such as rent, medical care and car insurance. Consumer prices rose 3.1% year-on-year, with the all-important Core number (which excludes food and energy prices) rising 0.3% in November for a 4.0% annualized rate, unchanged from the previous month’s reading. While this mixed bag did not seriously damage Wall Street’s expectation for early 2024 interest rate cuts, it didn’t exactly support it, either.
With the Fed interest rate decision, Powell’s press conference and the publication of the Dot Plot looming the following day, the market initially seemed reluctant to take a stand one way or another based on the CPI data during Tuesday’s session - but then investors did what they have consistently been doing lately and defaulted to looking on the bright side of things and stocks eventually moved higher again, deeper into record high territory for 2023.
The big day finally arrived on Wednesday. Obviously, there was no change made to interest rates for the third meeting in a row, no surprise there. But both the language from Powell at his press conference and the publication of the Fed’s quarterly Dot Plot were pleasant surprises to those yearning for a swift end to the Fed’s recent restrictive policies.
Powell finally signaled that the cycle of monetary tightening that has whip-sawed markets and the economy for the last couple of years is, to all intents and purposes, over. He notably did not seem to push back on the idea of the death of the “higher for longer” narrative or the hope of multiple interest rate cuts in 2024, indeed he even kind of embraced it.
Traders also cheered the tweak to the Dot Plot, which showed most Fed officials now anticipating a reduction of 0.75% in the Fed Funds rate next year - a much sharper pace of cuts than indicated back in September.
Stocks immediately screamed higher, turbo-charged by a solid fall in Treasury interest rates. Mortgage rates dipped back below 7% (see below).The S&P 500 broke up through 4700 and the NASDAQ-100 extended its incredible 2023 surge to over 50%. Small Cap stocks had an even better day.
On Thursday, US stock markets initially rocketed higher again on a momentum follow-through from Super Wednesday, as it was already becoming known within 24 hours, with Small Caps once again taking the lead. As the day wore on, though, signs emerged of exhaustion and some profit-taking in what was clearly a short-term overbought market and the indexes finished only modestly higher.
The European Central Bank (ECB) and the Bank of England (BOE) followed the Fed’s lead as expected, both holding the line and leaving their interest rates unchanged. The messaging was very different though. If Powell was the U.S. market’s jolly Santa on Wednesday, happy to entertain the idea of rate cuts, ECB President Christine Lagarde and BOE Governor Andrew Bailey were far more Grinch-y in their statements.
Interviewed on CNBC on Friday morning, New York Fed President John Williams tried to pour a little cold water on the inferno of optimism by calling the idea of a March 2024 interest rate cut “premature” and, bizarrely, even seemed to deny some of what Powell had quite clearly said on Wednesday. Strange as it was, William’s statement did succeed in removing some of the froth and the S&P 500’s six-day winning streak finally came to an end as it eased back a fraction. However, the NASDAQ-100 (the index of the largest one hundred NASDAQ-listed stocks, excluding financials) still managed to advance to finish the week at its new all-time record high.
Stock markets are in full-on party mode, with little appearing able to derail a march higher recently. Earnings are growing again. Formerly lagging sectors like real estate and financials are rallying hard, playing solid catchup. Lagging styles and investing disciplines like Small Cap Value and high dividend stocks are rewarding the poor managers who’ve had to sit and watch the Magnificent Seven stocks soak up all the gains and headlines in the first 10 months of the year. Even international stocks are going higher.
Investors right now very firmly believe that 1) growth won’t slow materially and 2) the Fed will cut rates in March or May. In the short term (meaning before year-end) this strong belief is the stock market’s super power because it allows investors to safely ignore anything that contradicts that narrative, as long it doesn’t contradict it too strongly.
Last week’s CPI report is a perfect example. Headline inflation barely declined and Core CPI literally didn’t decline at all and is still running at double the Fed’s target (4.0% vs. 2.0%). Yet, stocks didn’t mind and took off because the report didn’t provide a negative enough surprise to break the current belief in 1) a soft landing and 2) imminent and meaningful interest rate cuts.
However, as we start 2024 with a clean slate and investors will have to start thinking properly again about economics, earnings and elections, the burden of proof will shift to the bulls and the whole concept of “as long as news is not disastrous, then it’s really good” will not cut it any more once the New Year’s celebrations are done. Pivots like the one we just saw only work once. And the Fed just used it.
OTHER NEWS ..
A Busy Week For Elon .. Elon Musk had an interesting week. He started out deservedly copping tons of crap for reaching the astonishing judgment that somehow it would be a really good idea to let appalling conspiracy theorist Alex Jones back onto X/Twitter so he could resume spewing lies and brain-dead toxic nonsense to all his dopey followers. Musk chose to even celebrate this bonkers decision by joining Jones and self-styled hate influencer Andrew Tate (currently under indictment for multiple rapes, assaults and human sex trafficking and also inexplicably reinstated by Musk), on a cuddly “welcome back” audio chat on the platform.
Musk is still desperately trying to repair the damage caused by his own recent burst of ill-timed anti-semitism (including a desperately awkward PR-advised apology tour to Israel) which - along with the fact that their ads on the platform were appearing next to pro-Nazi and white supremacist content - generated a massive boycott from the platform’s biggest advertisers.
His ridiculous antics seem to have finally come to the attention of Apple and the suggestion is that X/Twitter is teetering on the brink of being kicked out of the App Store for multiple rule violations.
Musk’s other play-thing, Tesla, was forced last week to recall more than 2 million vehicles after the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration determined its driver-assistance system Autopilot doesn’t do enough to keep drivers engaged. We also know that surveys are showing that U.S. consumers are simply not very convinced by the electric vehicle use case, given the associated high prices of vehicles and a still lame national charging network.
Revenge Of The Job Seekers .. After suffering constant “ghosting” from prospective employers lacking the courtesy to respond or provide feedback to candidates, 70% of job seekers say they feel it’s completely fair to ghost employers back, according to a survey of 4500 job hunters around the world and over 60% plan to implement an employer-ghosting strategy in their job search. Over 35% of them report receiving no acknowledgement of an appropriately-submitted job application in 2023 while 40% said they were never contacted again even following a second or third round interview. The ghosting rate of candidates is now 2x what it was pre-pandemic, very possibly as a result of the increased use of artificial intelligence or online algorithms being used by employers.
Job seekers are now saying that two can play at that game. Techniques include refusal to respond to emails or meeting requests from employers deemed to be disrespectful, failing to let them know that the candidate has secured another position and continuing to lead them on for a while or in some cases apparently just logging off mid-meeting with no warning during a Zoom interview - which is a lot easier to do than standing up and walking out of the room during an old-school-type interview!
More Flyers Than Ever .. A record 7.5 million people are expected to fly during the Christmas-New Year holiday period, marking the busiest year-end travel season since tracking of the data began in 2000. Road travel is also set to rise.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Despite the unbridled enthusiasm we saw last week, we cannot forget that no market moves in straight lines and when Demand drives indexes to new highs, there’s often a huge lump of Supply just waiting to pounce.
Last week saw multi-year highs in the readings of the % of stocks within 2%, 5% and 10% of their one year highs. This is very healthy indeed, especially when coupled with the reading for the % of stocks 20% or more below their one year highs falling to its lowest level for a while, indicating a renewed appetite for the most beaten-down names. As shown below, a very solid 72% of S&P 500 stocks are now trading above their long term averages. This is also an encouraging stat, demonstrating strong broad participation and momentum in the rally.
There is definitely evidence that investors are now fishing in the sectors of the market that have lagged (particular sectors and Mid and Small Caps) as they try to add exposure to any part of the market that can be considered good value.
There is no doubt, however, that conditions are short-term overbought and it could well be that we need some kind of a pullback next week in order to set up a next leg higher.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The Federal Reserve's preferred inflation measure, the Personal Income and Expenditures (PCE) Price Report comes out on Friday. November’s inflation reading is forecast to be 3.3% higher than a year ago, versus 3.5% annualized in October.
Still a few companies left to report Q3 earnings this week, including FedEx, Nike, General Mills. Carnival, Micron and CarMax.
Other economic data out this week will be focused on the U.S. housing market. Releases include the Housing Market Index, Housing Starts, Existing Home Sales and New Home Sales data.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The unwritten rules of tipping have changed. And it’s sending lots of people crazy.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing U.S. sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower) - up 5.6% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing U.S. sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 0.7% for the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest U.S. companies. It rose 2.1% last week, is up 24.6% year-to-date (total return) and is now 1.8% below its all-time high (01/03/2022). SPY is above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 73***
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks. It rose 5.9% last week, is up 14.3% year-to-date (total return) and is now 18.8% below its all-time high (11/05/2021). IWM is above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 75***
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: strong but technically overbought, RSI below 30: weak but technically oversold
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power rose by 15 points last week to 165 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure fell by 7 points to 121over the course of the week.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 7.03%, one month ago: 7.44%, one year ago: 6.31%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
The “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
% OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE (LTMA) ..
One week ago: 62%, one month ago: 49%, one year ago: 51%
A closely-watched measure of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below the 200-day moving average which is among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 51% (47% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 30% (25% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 19% (28% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 32 (Bullish by 19 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be after the Fed’s next meeting on January 31st?
One week ago: 4%, one month ago: 0%
One week ago: 93%, one month ago: 100%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.54%) is being paid for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (3.91%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rose last week from 0.48% to 0.53%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
For the first three days of last week, the market’s price action felt a bit like a head-thumping hangover the morning after the month-long bender that was November. Then on Friday we got a very Goldilocks Jobs Report which sent prices spiraling upwards again and the S&P 500 had managed to squeak out a new 2023 high by Friday’s close.
A majority of S&P 500 stocks moved higher on Monday,but the index fell - dragged lower for once by the so-called Magnificent Seven (Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet/Google, Nvidia, Meta/Facebook, Amazon and Tesla) all of whom fell by more than 1% for the session.
A narrative developed, bolstered by some of the talking-head types on CNBC and Bloomberg TV, that maybe the expectations of when and by how much the Fed will begin cutting interest rates may be the teeny-tiniest bit over-optimistic and that when the Fed loudly insists that it will not go on a drunken, indiscriminate rate-slashing spree in the first half of 2024, there’s at least a small chance that they might actually mean it.
On Tuesday, we learned from the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) that the number of job openings in the US dropped to 8.73 million in October, down from September's 9.55 million, the lowest level since March 2021 and well below the expectation of 9.40 million. Bond yields responded by coming down sharply with the 10 year Treasury interest rate, which had been over 5.0% as recently as October, falling below 4.2%. The S&P 500 index ticked lower again but most of the Magnificent Seven came right back, reversing Monday’s losses.
Wednesday saw another moderate drift lower in stock prices, completing a three-day losing streak for the first time in over a month. Indexes were driven lower partly by their energy-related components as the oil price dipped below $70 on excess supply concerns and a continuing sense that November’s meteoric rise in stocks may just have been overdone and that the upside from here could be more limited as a result.
Artificial Intelligence re-emerged as a market influence on Thursday as both Google and AMD announced new AI-related initiatives. There’s absolutely nothing 2023’s stock market loves more than even a sniff of a mention of anything to do with AI and all the indexes shifted higher, bringing the short losing streak to an end in the lead-up to the all-important Jobs Report the following day.
It landed before the market open on Friday. Payrolls rose 199k in the month, a little above estimates. The unemployment rate fell to 3.7%, below all forecasts and a four-month low as well as extending an historic 22-month stretch in which it has remained below 4% — the longest since Neil Diamond first let us know that good times never felt so good as they did with Caroline in 1969.
The combination of last week’s two big labor market reports keeps current interest rate expectations (no more hikes, cuts coming up pretty soon) in place and did not imply a loss of momentum. In other words, it didn’t really move the needle much and keeps the soft landing thesis very much on the table. We also got a consumer sentiment reading that soared higher as Americans grow more and more confident about where the economy is heading. Stocks moved higher on the back of this feast of good news.
Generally speaking, once Thanksgiving is in the rear view mirror, market participants simply want the year to end quietly, with no surprises and perhaps a few decent gains. The net result is that markets tend to temporarily ignore any data or commentary that might jeopardize the gains (assuming it’s not too bad) and embrace any data or commentary that pushes the bullish narrative, into year-end. I think we are in the midst of that right now, as shown by the bubbly reaction to a couple of AI stories and some pretty good, but hardly sensational, labor market news.
Once this peculiar period ends and January gets under way, things tend to normalize again. What will that normalization look like in early 2024? I think it is all less complex than it seems and will mostly be about expectation vs. actual facts.
Put very simply, if actual facts about economic/inflation data, earnings, bond yields and Fed interest rate policy turn out better than market assumptions, stocks will likely rally. If the actual facts disappoint compared to market assumptions - particularly if the baked-in idea of early rate cuts does not come to pass - then stocks will probably drop, maybe quite hard.
OTHER NEWS ..
Dow Left Behind in 2023 ..Sharp-eyed subscribers will have noticed that, while I frequently refer to indexes like the S&P 500, the NASDAQ and the Russell 2000 in my reports, I do not ever talk about the media’s favorite index, the Dow Jones Industrial Average. That’s because it’s a stupid index. It also hasn’t under-performed the far-superior S&P 500 by this much at any time since the end of the century.
While focusing on one year’s worth of performance data and drawing big conclusions is never a good idea (see ARTICLE OF THE WEEK below) it’s still interesting to note that the olden-timey classic Dow gauge of market performance is up only 10% this year, half that of its big S&P brother, whose 2023 performance itself is only half that of the NASDAQ-100. The biggest reason? The much heavier tech and communications services presence in the S&P 500's and especially the NASDAQ-100’s composition.
Why bother? .. The useless end-of-2024 predictions for the S&P 500 keep coming in. Their record of accuracy is rubbish. For the last five completed years, the prediction vs. actual outcome error ranged from 26% too low to 21% too high. On average, the median annual estimate was off by about 18 percentage points! That’s nearly double the index’s long-term average annual return. Please don’t take any notice of this stuff.
Like A Bad Smell .. Meme stock favorite and nonsense company GameStop came back into our consciousness last week. The good news for the “diamond hands” shareholders who bought in using their Robin Hood accounts during the pandemic, slurped all the Reddit-fueled Kool Aid and held on is that the stock surged 20% on Thursday alone. It’s also up 30% since Thanksgiving. The not-so-good news is that it is also still down more than 82% from its high in 2021.
Three Trill .. Shares of the technology giant Apple rose to close the week at $195.72 which put its market capitalization at over the $3 trillion level (that’s $3,000,000,000,000) and was its highest close since its all-time high in back in July.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Buying Power’s path of least resistance remains to the upside after having reached new multi-month highs in recent days. However, Selling Pressure has a tendency to strengthen as indexes reach new high-water marks, such as the new 2023 high experienced by the S&P 500 last week. Sometimes the sellers only stick around for a short while, but it does make continued price acceleration harder.
Selectivity is still apparent, favoring Large Cap stocks, but buyers are beginning to find new targets in the Mid Cap and Small Cap space, narrowing the Large/Small gap. While core technical indicators still have work to do to erase negative divergences in place since July, a continuation of this recent resurgence in smaller stocks, thanks to their larger numbers, will be crucial for market-wide improvements in Demand and a sustained intermediate-term advance.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week is the last big one of the year when it comes to data, headlined by the Federal Reserve's December rate meeting with a decision due on Wednesday afternoon. The market overwhelmingly expects it to keep the Federal Funds rate steady at a target range of 5.25%-5.50%.
Attention will be on Chairman Jerome Powell's press conference that afternoon and on the Federal Open Market Committee's latest quarterly so-called “Dot Plot”, the Fed officials' latest projections for the economy and the members’ anticipated trajectory for interest rates.
The European Central Bank and Bank of England follow with their own monetary-policy decisions on Thursday.
Earnings reports next week will come from Oracle, Adobe, Costco and Darden Restaurants.
On Tuesday, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for November will be released. The average forecast calls for an unchanged 4.0% year-over-year rise in the Core CPI, which excludes food and energy. The next day, the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers is expected to slow slightly from a month earlier.
The most recent Retail Sales data will come out on Thursday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Investors’ biggest mistake at this time of year; looking at the stock market over the course of just twelve months. “You can’t talk about 2023 without looking at 2022.”
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 1.8% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - down 2.8% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power fell by 4 points last week to 150 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure rose by 4 points to 128over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It ended the week up 21.7% year-to-date (total return) and 3.7% below its all-time high (01/03/2022). SPY is above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 70***
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It ended the week up 8.3% year-to-date (total return) and 23.0% below its all-time high (11/05/2021). IWM is above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 67***
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: strong but technically overbought, RSI below 30: weak but technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 7.22%, one month ago: 7.50%, one year ago: 6.33%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE (LTMA) ..
One week ago: 63%, one month ago: 37%, one year ago: 54%
A closely-watched measure of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below the 200-day moving average which is among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 47% (49% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 25% (32% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 28% (19% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 19 (Bullish by 30 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023 (one more Fed decision day, on December 13th)?
One week ago: 99%, one month ago: 90%
One week ago: 1%, one month ago: 10%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The highest rate on the yield curve (5.54%) is being paid for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.23%) is for the 10-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rose last week from 0.34% to 0.48%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve.
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones). Based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread, the curve has been inverted since July 2022.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded by many as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Stocks closed out a truly spectacular November last week with the S&P 500 index finishing about 9% higher than it was at the beginning of the month. Tech stocks were the best performers by sector, but real estate came a close second - despite the cratering post-pandemic commercial space. Energy was the worst performer, falling 2% in line with very weak oil prices and was the only sector with a negative outcome for the month.
Monday proved to be a rather forgettable session, with prices trapped inside a narrow range, eventually finishing a touch lower. The only thing of interest going on was the trickle of data releases on all the shopping being done the previous week. The biggest takeaway from the early data was that consumer spending could be up handsomely from last year and that (shocker!) we are all doing more of our shopping online rather than braving actual stores.
Some of the good vibes returned on Tuesday. A report showed that consumer confidence increased in November after having fallen for three consecutive months. Fed-speak was generally supportive also. Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said policy is well positioned to return inflation to the Fed’s 2% goal and his colleague Michelle Bowman deftly avoided answering when directly asked if there would be another interest rate hike. Most stocks took another small leg higher.
More encouraging Thanksgiving-related data came out on Wednesday. Over 200 million U.S. consumers participated in weekend shopping, that’s 18 million more than expected and more people travelled through U.S. airports in a single day on Sunday than ever before.
But the big news of the day was that the second of three official estimates indicated that the U.S. economy grew faster in Q3 than even optimistic analysts had thought. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rose at a mind-bending 5.2% annualized pace, up from the previous estimate of 4.9%, more than double the previous quarter’s growth rate and the fastest since the economy began rapidly accelerating out of the depths of the pandemic two years ago. Consumer spending also grew, but at a less-breakneck rate of 3.6%. After initially jumping higher on the data, stock prices faded in the afternoon to finish largely unchanged.
Before the market opened on Thursday, we learned that the Fed’s darling inflation measure, the Core Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) index, came in as expected at a year-on-year 3.2% and the annualized rate over the last six months has now fallen to 2.5%, pretty much putting the final nail in the coffin of any chance of an interest rate hike on December 13th at the Fed’s final rate-setting meeting of the year (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below). Stocks ticked higher again.
Friday marked the beginning of the final month of 2024 and Decembers have traditionally proved pretty generous to stock investors. And we got off to a solid start this year, following a speech from Fed Chair Jerome Powell, making the rather innocuous, not-very-startling statement that he believed the central bank's recent policies have helped bring down inflation. But in the current giddy glass-is-half-full environment, this was seen to even further bolster the case that policymakers won't raise interest rates any further.
Stocks took their cue from this interpretation and all the indexes finished the day meaningfully higher, with Small Caps in particular outshining the rest.
The end of 2024 guesstimates for the S&P 500 are rolling in .. much of what I’m seeing clusters near a record-busting price target of close to 5000 (the all-time high is 4796, reached on the first trading day of 2022), with some of them as high as 5400 and remarkably few predicting lower prices than where we are now.
The index closed on Friday at around 4595, so a 5,000 level on New Year’s Eve 2024 implies a rally of 8.8% over the next thirteen months. This is not far from the historical average gain per year for the index but, if accomplished, would represent a rather impressive total two-year gain of more than 30% from the end of 2022 to the end of 2024.
Interesting factoid for 2024 crystal ball-gazers; in election years of first-term presidents, whether they get re-elected or not, the stock market has historically moved higher literally 100% of the time.
The bullish argument for stocks can largely be summed up by; Everything that’s already priced in actually happens. Because a lot of it hasn’t yet. Bulls are anticipating; no economic slowdown, immaculate disinflation, resilient corporate earnings continue to beat expectations and a healthy dose of interest rate cuts from the Fed in 2024 and beyond.
The bearish argument for stocks can largely be summed up by; Everything we were worried about for 2023 actually ends up happening in 2024. In other words, the long list of concerns for 2023 weren’t misguided, they were just early. Bears are anticipating (much as they were a year ago); economic growth actually contracts leading to a recession, inflation stops falling and maybe even ticks back higher again, corporate earnings growth disappoints and the Fed does not cut interest rates as soon or by as much as expected.
We should remember that outcomes are rarely binary and elements of both theses will probably come to fruition, but these are the factors to keep an eye on which - along with any kind of unpredictable external shock and I think the inevitable craziness that will accompany the U.S. presidential election - will determine how accurate these year-end 2024 price target guesses end up being.
OTHER NEWS ..
Riddle Me This .. On Monday, we got data that showed that the median price of a new home had plunged 18% year over year. Then the next day, we were told that existing home prices rose for an eighth straight month, surging to a new record high.
Put that all together and housing prices are .. rising? Falling? It depends? Everyone expected home prices to fall when mortgage rates shot up to 8%. But it turns out that most American homeowners had already locked in a mortgage interest rate far below today’s and have no intention of giving that up, meaning hardly anyone is selling. This lack of inventory has led to bidding wars and higher prices for existing homes.
Builders, meanwhile, have now started trying to fill that gap with accelerating new construction and the market for new home sales has had a different dynamic altogether.
The housing/shelter component is about a 40% weighting in the Core Consumer Price Index (CPI) reading. Without lower price inflation in that category, it is going to be hard for the Fed to reach its target of bringing inflation back down to to 2%.
New Blood .. Joining the S&P 500 index on December 18th in one of its occasional reconstitutions will be Uber, Jabil and Builders FirstSource. Booted out to make way for these three new members will be Sealed Air, Alaska Air and SolarEdge Technologies.
Apple Pulls The Plug On Goldman Sachs .. The tech company recently sent a proposal to the Wall Street investment bank announcing its intention to exit their credit card and savings account partnership contract in the next 12 to 15 months, according to a Bloomberg report. This contract had previously been extended through 2029 just a matter of months ago.
The end of the much-heralded cooperation initiative which began with the Apple credit card in 2019 and then the high yield savings account earlier this year is the final nail in the coffin of Goldman's doomed bid to expand into consumer lending which was launched back in 2016 with the introduction of the Marcus savings account.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
It is important to remember that the market deals in probabilities, not certainties. That’s where certain forms of technical analysis can be useful, but frequently it exposes two sides of a coin. This is one of those times.
The continuation higher in the last two or three weeks of the percentage of stocks trading above their Long Term Moving Averages (see below) is consistent with a further improvement in market breadth and supports the case that the November rally may possibly more sustainable than initially thought.
However, the percent of stocks 20% or more below their one year highs also remains stubbornly elevated and is well above its late July levels despite the S&P 500 now being very close to the highs of that time.
Also, the major price indexes are in the process of challenging a potential Supply zone in the form of their late July highs while at the same time short-term overbought conditions are present. This combination always increases market risks.
There are two things to keep an eye on .. 1) any weakening in Large Cap internals, which would likely happen if the major index advance were nearing its end, and 2) signs that Small Cap stocks are starting to strengthen, because even if larger stocks stall, new buying in smaller stocks - which some would call a healthy rotation - has the capacity to keep the advance going.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
It’s jobs week. The latest Jobs Report comes out on Friday. Consensus calls for 175k new payrolls in November, after a gain of 150,000 in October. The unemployment rate is forecast to hold steady at 3.9%.
Before that we get the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS), which is expected to show 9.4 million jobs available, down slightly from September.
Together, these two data points will probably suggest a still-tight labor market in the U.S., but less dramatically so than earlier this year.
Not a lot going on on the earnings front, although we will hear from AutoZone, Broadcom, Dollar General, Campbell’s Soup and J.M. Smucker.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
It may not always feel like it, but there really has never been a better time to be a stock market investor.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower) - up 4.3% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - down 0.9% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power rose by 15 points last week to 154 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure fell by 13 points to 124over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It ended the week up 21.4% year-to-date (total return) and 3.9% below its all-time high (01/03/2022). SPY is above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 74***
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It ended the week up 7.2% year-to-date (total return) and 23.8% below its all-time high (11/05/2021). IWM is now above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 68***
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: strong but technically overbought, RSI below 30: weak but technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE ..
One week ago: 7.29%, one month ago: 7.79%, one year ago: 6.49%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE (LTMA) ..
One week ago: 55%, one month ago: 38%, one year ago: 63%
A closely-watched measure of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below the 200-day moving average which is among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market, with 50% considered to be a key pivot point.
WEEKLY US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 49% (45% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 32% (31% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 19% (24% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 30 (Bullish by 21 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Survey participants are typically polled during the first half of the week.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023 (one more Fed decision day, on December 13th)?
One week ago: 96%, one month ago: 80%
One week ago: 4%, one month ago: 20%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.55%) being paid currently for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (4.14%) for the 5-year.
The most closely-watched and commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell from 0.45% to 0.34%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Stocks moved higher last week for the fourth week in a row with the major indexes ending the holiday-shortened week up by about 1%. The sense grew that the typical year-end Santa Claus rally may possibly have begun even before Thanksgiving. But trading volumes were so low that drawing any real conclusions from last week’s activity would be a fool’s errand.
No news was good news on a slow, drama-free Monday. Stock indexes drifted steadily upwards on low volume throughout most of the trading session to close near the highs of the day. 2024 brings a host of unanswered questions, but right now that's a problem for another day. In the near term, what's not to like?
Stocks floated gently lower in another bland session on Tuesday. The often closely-scrutinized minutes from the most recent Fed meeting were released and were met with a huge yawn. There was far more excitement and anticipation about Nvidia’s Q3 earnings due out after the closing bell that day.
This reflects an ongoing shift from the market’s previous laser focus on every single little thing that the Fed is saying or doing to starting to care more about what is actually happening on the ground when it comes to corporate earnings and outlook, especially in the case of those dominant companies in the so-called Magnificent Seven (Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet/Google, Nvidia, Meta/Facebook, Amazon and Tesla).
When it came out, Nvidia’s Q3 earnings report was once again astounding. Its reported revenues of $20 billion blew away analysts’ estimates, but it is a sign of how far ahead the market has got of itself that investors’ first instinct was to sell the stock (which was up over 240% year-to-date at the time) because it obliterated expectations by slightly less than it might have and there are enormous amounts of good news already baked into the price. Nvidia has clearly set a very high bar for itself.
Tuesday’s losses were erased by gains on Wednesday in yet another low-volume snoozer on Thanksgiving Eve with only a muted response to Nvidia’s numbers. Stocks were driven to their highest levels since early August mainly by a solid day for Microsoft on the back of the absurd and tiresome saga of Open AI and Sam Altman. Markets then made a brief return from turkey day on Friday, ending the abbreviated session mixed and little changed in very thin trading.
While last week’s stock market activity was extremely uninteresting and uninformative, there is an important change to be aware of. Regular readers will know that I always talk of the Three Pillars upon which 2023’s stock rally has been built, that is: 1. No Landing / Soft Landing, 2. Disinflation, 3. Fed Done/Almost Done with Rate Hikes.
The hypothesis is that as long as these three pillars all remain solidly in place, we are unlikely to experience a meaningful market decline as it is these factors that have driven the market higher this year. But if they all begin to crumble then look out below, because stocks are only as high as they are based on the premise that these pillars are all valid and continue to be so (which is currently the case).
Events have moved on and there is now an adjustment to the definition of the third pillar. “Fed Done/Almost Done with Rate Hikes” has (absent some kind of major external shock) now become “Interest Rate Cuts Sooner Rather Than Later”.
The Fed may well confirm at its December meeting that they are “done” with rate hikes for the foreseeable future and with that confirmation comes new risks.
Put simply, the gap between what the Fed says it plans to do (cut rates just once at some point in 2024) and what the market expects it to do (cut rates at least three or four times next year, starting as soon as about May) is extremely wide and disappointment on the part of a market that has essentially already priced in its view of events could lead to a troubling outcome for stocks. We need to keep a close eye on this now-adjusted pillar alongside the other two.
OTHER NEWS .. MORE BROS BEHAVING BADLY EDITION
Another One Bites The Dust .. While the financial media furiously focused last week on the tedious story of a bunch of AI nerds and their complete inability to figure out how to run a business, the real story of the week was that yet another earthquake shook the corrupt rubble that is what remains of crypto world.
The world’s largest crypto exchange, Binance and its CEO Changpeng Zhao (known in bro-world of course as CZ) pleaded guilty in federal court in Seattle on Tuesday to multiple money-laundering and sanctions violations, including enabling and facilitating transactions for illicit groups such as ISIS, Al Quaeda and more.
Prison-bound CZ will step down as CEO and personally pay a $50 million fine after pleading guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act. The firm itself will pay fines of $4.3 billion in one of the largest ever monetary penalties ever imposed in U.S. history.
Unlike FTX (the world’s second largest crypto exchange before its collapse last year under recently-convicted fraudster Sam Bankman-Fried), the Binance exchange will be allowed to keep operating, but under new management.
Crypto’s two biggest pin-up boys are now both convicted felons. The two largest crypto exchanges have now been shown to have operated as useful tools for drug dealers, child traffickers, extortionists and international and domestic terrorists as well as sewers of corruption and fraud where billions of dollars of client assets were completely unsafe from misuse and outright theft.
This nonsensical libertarian utopia with zero regulation has come crashing down and will hopefully soon be replaced with transparent and highly-regulated securities under close and constant scrutiny from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) such as exchange traded funds and transactions carried out on properly-controlled established exchanges that actually have a long list of rules for all participants and strict customer protections for those looking to gain exposure to the crypto ecosystem.
And In More Ridiculous Tech Bro News .. Tech entrepreneur and self-driving car pioneer, Anthony Levandowski, is rebooting his AI church in a renewed attempt at creating a religious movement focused on the worship of artificial intelligence, according to Bloomberg News.
Levandowski’s so-called “Way of the Future” was founded in 2015 but shut down a few years later. According to him, the congregation at the new church, which shares the original’s name,has “a couple of thousand people” who apparently all meet up to build a “spiritual connection between humans and AI”. Big eye-roll.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Last week’s price action moved the reading for Buying Power back above that of Selling Pressure for the first time since mid-September.
However, history reminds us that most selective Demand environments like the one we are experiencing, eventually give way to major market tops, but on an unknowable time horizon. Investors need to recognize that the market’s strong buying preference is still mostly for quality mega-cap stocks. While “the rest” could feasibly catch up with “the best” , it is historically more typical for Demand to finally recede from the strongest stocks, bringing them back down closer to the level of the rest of the pack.
Last week, even as the S&P 500 index got to within 1% of the one year high that it reached in July, there were still more stocks that were 20% or more below their one year highs (39%) than stocks that were 10% or less below their one year highs (36%). This is a highly significant and meaningful divergence, emphasizing yet again that there are still plenty of stocks not really participating in the current rally to the extent that you would expect and that is not a formula for a sustainable turnaround. We need that percentage to explode much higher and quite soon if we aren’t to see a rather meaningful slump in stock prices.
The party is still ongoing, but the music may be slowing.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week’s earnings highlights will be from Intuit, Dell, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, VMware, CrowdStrike, Dollar Tree, Kroger, Foot Locker, Snowflake and Ulta Beauty.
On Thursday we get to see the latest Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index for October, the Core version of which is what the Fed uses to assess inflation and inform all of its interest rate decisions. This reading is expected to be up 3.5% from a year earlier, versus an increase of 3.7% in the year through September.
Other economic data out this week will include the latest New Home Sales data and the National Home Price index as well as the Consumer Confidence Index for November.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The only four charts you need to see to understand investing.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: Eli Lilly, United Healthcare) - up 1.6% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - down 0.6% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power rose by 5 points last week to 139, resuming its position of dominance over that of US stock market Selling Pressure which fell by 10 points to 137over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It ended the week up 19.2% year-to-date and 4.7% below its all-time high (01/03/2022). SPY is above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 72***
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It ended the week up 2.9% year-to-date and 26.1% below its all-time high (11/05/2021). IWM is above its 50-day moving average but below its 90-day and is also below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 60***
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: strong but technically overbought, RSI below 30: weak but technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
One week ago: 7.44%, one month ago: 7.63%, one year ago: 6.58%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE (LTMA) ..
One week ago: 51%, one month ago: 27%, one year ago: 60%
A closely-watched measure of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below the 200-day moving average which is among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 45% (44% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 31% (28% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 24% (28% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 21 (Bullish by 16 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023 (one more Fed decision day, on December 13th)?
One week ago: 100%, one month ago: 75%
One week ago: 0%, one month ago: 25%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains unusually “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.56%) being paid currently for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.47%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rose from 0.38% to 0.45%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve is not the norm and has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Good news for stocks erupted all over the place last week. We saw slowdowns in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation and the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation faced by manufacturers, we saw the (temporary) avoidance of a government shutdown, we saw continued mostly impressive earnings, particularly from Target (TGT) which soared 18% in a day and plummeting market interest rates. Everywhere you looked there were reasons to buy stocks.
Markets opened the week on Monday in a rather somber mood, following the previous Friday’s outlook downgrade for the United States from Moody’s Investor Services. But attention soon shifted to the week’s main event and next big narrative catalyst, the release of the CPI report the following day. There are still those who believe in the concept of Immaculate Disinflation and that Tuesday’s data might bolster that belief and it was this kind of optimism about the upcoming inflation data that stabilized things and stocks finished the day largely unchanged.
When it arrived pre-market on Tuesday morning, we got what was in every sense of the word a very cool CPI report. There was zero inflation in October as consumer prices remained unchanged from September. The increase in the headline rate over the year through October was 3.2%, markedly lower than the 3.7% pace from the previous month. The all-important (to the Federal Reserve) Core CPI reading, which excludes food and energy costs, rose by0.2% in the last month for a slightly lower annualized rate of 4.0%.
Almost everything about the CPI report was better than expected and appeared to justify a reduction in concerns about a re-emergence of high inflation. It also reinforced to investors that the second of the Three Pillars of the Rally (1. No Landing / Soft Landing, 2. Disinflation, 3. Fed Done/Almost Done with Rate Hikes) was still very much in place and it helped the Immaculate Disinflation believers cling to their faith.
As such, it likely eliminated the possibility of another interest rate hike from the Fed (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below) and caused investors to now anticipate rate cuts sooner and larger than previously expected.
Unsurprisingly, financial markets fell madly in love with the report, especially when paired with the slowly but steadily rising jobless rate. Treasury yields plunged at the open and stocks exploded upwards out of the gate and kept flying all day.
The green-on-the-screen carried into Wednesday, by which time markets had digested the news from the previous evening that, despite some quite extraordinary in-fighting among Republicans (in a couple of cases, almost literally), the House had passed legislation to avert a government shutdown (later overwhelmingly confirmed by the Senate), even if once again it was just kicking the can down the road.
This time it was a “laddered” resolution out until February 2nd of next year - which ironically enough is Groundhog Day. There’s clearly no long term joined-up thinking going on here, this is just how things are likely to be with Congress and shutdowns going forward.
Do nothing for weeks or months → Last minute brinkmanship and grandstanding → Lots of yelling → Short term Band-Aid → More yelling → Rinse and repeat.
More economic data emerged and we saw that PPIisconfirming the lower inflation narrative and Retail Sales fell slightly - both further pushing the idea that the Fed couldn’t possibly think about raising interest rates again. All these tailwinds meant that stocks finished Wednesday a touch higher, instead of suffering any whiplash from Tuesday’s monster rally as often happens after days like that.
Stocks took a breather on Thursday, particularly Small Caps which gave back a chunk of their impressive gains from Tuesday, while all the other indexes finished basically flat on the day. Friday was similar, with rudderless sideways trading for the entire session - the only difference this time was that Small Caps went and out-performed the other indexes this time. The relative dullness of the last two days of the week can actually be viewed as a positive as the massive gains of earlier in the week were maintained into the weekend.
This latest stock rally is an example of the stock market aggressively pricing in what it wants to believe, namely that the Fed will soon turn dovish and interest rates will fall both imminently and meaningfully. Wall Street once again totally disbelieves the Fed whenever it talks of higher-for-longer interest rates and last week’s CPI and PPI reports have only emboldened it’s stance.
Will under-invested institutions needing to jump on board the stock train by year-end chase this stock market higher into a solid or even spectacular Santa Claus rally? Very possibly. But the wide gulf that exists between what the Fed is saying and what the market believes it will do does makes stock prices highly vulnerable to any severe disappointment if it begins to look as if the Fed is winning that particular arm-wrestle.
In this regard, put a big X by December 13th on your calendar, because that’s when we get to see the next quarterly Fed “Dot Plot” of the Fed committee members’ interest rate change expectations for 2024 and beyond.
OTHER NEWS ..
X Marks The Troublespot .. Apple, Disney, IBM, Sony, Comcast, Warner Brothers, Paramount, Lions Gate and the European Union are among those rushing for the exits at X/Twitter as they all suspended their advertising on the platform after a Media Matters report confirmed that their ads were frequently running alongside pro-Nazi posts.
The list of runaway advertisers may well be longer by the time you read this. The report said that multiple other firms are also suffering the same fate and many of them appear to be considering joining the exodus of those abandoning the ailing social media channel.
Meanwhile, the situation has been compounded and the exit rate accelerated by the fallout from X/Twitter owner Elon Musk enthusiastically endorsing anti-semitic and white supremacist conspiracies while attacking and abusing the Anti-Defamation League on his own platform. A number of major Tesla shareholders came out to express that they are losing patience with South African-born Musk’s increasingly “bizarre and detrimental” behavior with some of them openly championing the idea of his removal as chairman.
Tesla stock has basically been on a wild ride to nowhere for the last three years, so their frustration is understandable. The price closed on Friday right around where it was on New Year’s Eve 2020. It swiftly lost over $40 billion in market value after Musk’s ill-advised comments first appeared on Wednesday.
Grim News in CRE .. Foreclosures are surging in riskiest corners of commercial real-estate financing, offering one of the strongest signs yet that the turmoil in the property market is worsening. Lenders this year have issued a record number of foreclosure notices for high-risk property loans, according to the Wall Street Journal. Many of these loans are similar to second mortgages and commonly known as “mezzanine loans”. The increase in mezzanine loan foreclosure announcements matters because it offers a more immediate measure of commercial real estate distress than mortgage foreclosure rates.
Oh no, Oreo! .. Suspicion over subtle changes to Oreo cookies has prompted some fans to protest what they believe is one of the biggest inflation scandals to date: “Double Stuf” Oreos with just a normal amount of creme and then less in the original-sized versions. Some Oreo enthusiasts are posting videos online of twisting the cookie open to reveal a more scarce filling. Snack giant Mondelez, the maker of the world’s best-selling cookie, promises it hasn’t tinkered with the creme ratio, but “always welcomes feedback from consumers”. Hmmm.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Tuesday’s super-surge in stocks went a long way to resolving some of the negative divergences in technical key indicators that had developed since the beginning of November. But long-term technical analysis is not built for speed, we need to see sustained moves in one direction to generate true turnarounds.
A first step would be to observe Buying Power reclaim the dominant position above Selling Pressure (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below) and we aren’t there yet.
A lot has changed for the better and the preponderance of the evidence is close to tipping back toward the bullish side. Notably, for the first time since mid-September, a majority of stocks in the S&P 500 are back above their long term averages (see PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE below).
However, we must still recognize that the current potential lows were not born from an exhaustion of Supply as is usually the case, so the return of Demand must be overwhelming and undeniable to be fully trusted.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Wall Street will get a midweek break for the Thanksgiving holiday. Equity and bond markets will both be closed in observance of Thanksgiving on Thursday. Stock trading will end at 1pm ET on Friday. The Bond market will close at 2pm ET.
We will get Q3 earnings from Lowe’s, Zoom, Best Buy, Hewlett Packard, Deere, Medtronic, Agilent Technologies and Autodesk - but the big one will be Nvidia on Tuesday.
The Fed will release the minutes from its early November meeting, when it again held interest rates steady.
Economic data will include the latest releases of the Leading Economic Index, Existing Home Sales and Durable Goods.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Picking individual stocks is a loser’s game and you shouldn’t even try to do it. Why not? It’s simple math and probability.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower) - up 5.5% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Walmart, Procter & Gamble) - up 0.5% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power rose by 14 points last week to 134 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure fell by 11 points to 147over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 70. SPY ended the week *up 19.2% year-to-date and is 5.6% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is above its 50-day moving average but below its 90-day and is also below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 60. IWM ended the week *up 3.4% year-to-date and is 26.5% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
One week ago: 7.50%, one month ago: 7.57%, one year ago: 6.61%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE (LTMA) ..
One week ago: 40%, one month ago: 38%, one year ago: 49%
A closely-watched measure of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below the 200-day moving average which is among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 44% (43% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 28% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 28% (27% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 16 (Bullish by 16 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023 (one more Fed decision, on December 13th)?
One week ago: 86%, one month ago: 57%
One week ago: 14%, one month ago: 43%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.54%) being paid currently for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.44%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rose from 0.42% to 0.44%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
A rather uneventful week was saved by a solid final day, although arguably the biggest event came after the close on Friday when a U.S. credit rating outlook downgrade was announced.
Stocks and bonds spent Monday aimlessly meandering around, looking for fresh direction following the previous week’s fiesta. Both Blackrock and Morgan Stanley were quick to come out with warnings that the end of October/early November super-rally could well swiftly reverse.
Tuesday was not much different. After another day of mostly directionless trading, the S&P 500 closed a little higher as Treasury yields and oil prices continued to trundle lower. The shift lower in the price of oil, which is flirting with multi-month lows, has caught a lot of people by surprise.
Given the turmoil in the Middle East and risk of the conflict turning into more of a regional crisis, the conventional wisdom had been that oil prices were going to move sharply higher and remain elevated. The exact opposite has happened, implying that geopolitical concerns are taking a back seat to growing fears of declining global demand for oil.
On Wednesday morning, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said precisely nada in a “nothing-burger” of a short speech. After initially resuming their trajectory of drifting gently higher, stocks eventually ran out of steam later in the day but with a late grind higher, the S&P 500 still managed to squeak out a minuscule gain, extending the index’s winning streak to eight trading days.
All good things must come to an end, however and the streak was broken on Thursday after Powell finally said something of substance in a climate protester-interrupted speech at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) HQ in Washington DC. “If it becomes appropriate to tighten policy further, we will not hesitate to do so,” is hardly a new revelation, but still served as a reminder to markets that the Fed has not yet formally issued an all-clear when it comes to raising interest rates. Market interest rates spiked and stocks bled lower all day in response.
On Friday after the market close, the United States’ credit rating outlook was downgraded from “stable” to “negative”byMoody’s Investors’ Services, following Fitch Ratings recent lead. The U.S. now has the same credit rating outlook at Moody’s as, for example, Argentina, El Salvador, Ukraine and Papua New Guinea. The credit ratings agency’s decision resulted from a recognition of the fact that, by the time you read my next weekly report, this country may not have a fully-functioning government thanks to the apparent willingness of Team Burn It All Down in Congress to throw the entire nation under the bus for their own political ends.
This followed what had been a remarkably solid day for markets as stocks rebounded hard, including a new all-time high for Microsoft (MSFT) as attention returned to October’s oversold conditions and a mostly very solid earnings season - and the recent sharp pullback in market interest rates resumed after Thursday’s hiccup.
This is a market searching for “what’s next?”and Moody’s may have just provided an uncomfortable answer to that. Otherwise it is likely to be either a) a growth scare that sends stocks lower, maybe even towards the October 2022 lows, or b) a resumption of the soft landing and disinflation narrative that pushed stocks higher this summer. For the rest of the year at least, markets will probably be playing a game of narrative roulette as the chatter changes week by week, sometimes even day by day.
This will only intensify as mid-November marks the beginning of the silly season when pundits’ and so-called experts’ 2024 predictions (otherwise known as complete guesswork with an appallingly poor track record of accuracy) start coming out, indeed some such nonsense has started polluting my inbox already.
We have seen this effect in microcosm over the last couple of weeks when we swiftly went from being deeply oversold to getting close to being overbought. Narratives would have told you everything is looking dismal two or three weeks ago. Be afraid, be very afraid. By last weekend, the narratives were all saying everything was fabulous. Blue skies all around.
The fact is that neither narrative set was appropriate or primarily governed by the prevailing facts or data. The pendulum is swinging too far, too fast. For the market to sustainably rally from here, it still needs what it hasn’t yet received: calm in the Treasury market. Neither the short, violent declines nor the sharp rises that we have seen recently are helpful to a stock market bullish turnaround.
Looking beyond the distracting noise and confusion of the narrative roulette game, we need to remain focused on the “Three Pillars” upon which the 2023 rally has been built (1. No Landing / Soft Landing, 2. Disinflation, 3. Fed Done/Almost Done with Rate Hikes). The current situation reflects some mild deterioration in the overall fundamentals, but the Three Pillars remain largely in place.
Things get better if:
data further confirms a no landing or soft landing,
core inflation data (ex- food and energy) continues to drop at a solid pace and nears 3% year-on-year,
the Fed further confirms no more hikes and softens its “higher for longer” language (and Treasury yields drift lower).
Things get worse if:
Economic data rolls over and points to a hard landing,
core inflation levels off or even bounces back higher,
the Fed puts a near-term rate hike back on the table and the 10-year Treasury yield moves back to 5%.
OTHER NEWS ..
More Retirees Than We Thought .. Over three-and-a-half years after COVID struck, the U.S. still has around 2 million more retirees than predicted according to Bloomberg, in one of the most striking and enduring changes to the nation’s labor force.
The so-called Great Retirement induced by the pandemic is made clear in the divergence between the actual number of retirees and that predicted by a Federal Reserve’s economic model. While down from a 2.8 million gap late last year, the divergence remains elevated today and currently sits at over 1.9m “excess retirees”.
For many older Americans, leaving the labor market is a one-way street and rejoining the workforce can be difficult, if not impossible. A decline in skills and work connections as well as widespread and rampant ageism in the workplace all make it harder for many older workers to get back in the workforce. In 2022, the mean duration to find a job for people age 65 and older was over 31 weeks, 9 weeks longer than the historical average.
The $100 Billion Market To Make Everyone Thinner Just Got More Crowded .. As reported on Bloomberg last week,Eli Lilly won U.S. approval to use the active ingredient in its diabetes drug, Zepbound, as a treatment for obesity and will make it available soon after Thanksgiving. It will cost $1,059.87 for a month’s supply. That’s cheaper than Wegovy, a similar drug made by Novo Nordisk, which is $1,349 for a month’s supply, but more expensive than Novo’s Ozempic which comes in at a “mere” $936.
The mania over weight-loss drugs is drawing responses from all kinds of industries, including airlines (who are very excited about the potential fuel cost savings brought about by flying slimmer passengers), dialysis centers (who see positive kidney-related effects of drugs like Ozempic) and big box chains like Walmart (who are fretting about their grocery sales in a world where people don’t get as hungry as they used to).
Eli Lilly was prevented from marketing its diabetes drug, Mounjaro, for obesity prior to Wednesday’s approval. The promise of these drugs has boosted the stocks of Lilly and Novo, indeed Lilly is now the most valuable health-care company in the world.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The price rally over the previous week was impressive; trading volume was up and Small Cap stocks very briefly surged, two factors notably absent over the last few weeks. But the response was limited in core technical indicators, which merely bounced somewhat within the confines of still-intact down-trends and failed to follow through powerfully last week as technical defensive characteristics quickly re-emerged.
There is still a lack of hard evidence yet that investors want to sustainably flock back to smaller, riskier stocks which they kind of need to do in order to confirm a new bull run. Indeed, on Thursday of last week both the Mid Cap index and the Small Cap Index reached new multi-year lows in relative terms vs. the S&P 500 Large Cap Index. Large company outperformance is greater than it’s been in years.
Instead of buyers being inspired to scoop up heavily-discounted Small and Mid Cap stocks, they have returned to their comfort blanket of the most well-known and highly-capitalized stocks on the planet.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Wrangling in Congress will likely be in the headlines all week with a Friday deadline to avoid a federal government shutdown.
There are still a few more Q3 earnings to report such as Walmart, Target, Cisco, Home Depot, Alibaba, TJX and Tyson Foods.
The main event on the economics calendar will be Tuesday's release of the October Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation. Estimates call for a 3.3% increase in the headline rate from a year ago. The Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers will be released the next day.
The latest Retail Sales numbers will be released on Wednesday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Why do we idolize a*s?*
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - up 3.8% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - down 2.7% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power fell by 13 points last week to 120 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure rose by 12 points to 158over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is now above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 62. SPY ended the week *up 15.2% year-to-date and 7.8% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 48. IWM ended the week *down 3.0% year-to-date and 30.3% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
One week ago: 7.76%, one month ago: 7.57%, one year ago: 7.08%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE (LTMA) ..
One week ago: 41%, one month ago: 43%, one year ago: 50%
A closely-watched measure of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many of the largest 500 publicly-traded stocks in the U.S. are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below the 200-day moving average which is among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 43% (24% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 30% (26% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 27% (50% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 16 (Bearish by 26 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023?
One week ago: 95%, one month ago: 73%
One week ago: 5%, one month ago: 27%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.55%) being paid currently for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.61%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rose sharply from 0.26% to 0.42%, indicating a meaningful steepening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Light shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It was a sensational week for stocks, the best of the year, with prices rising each and every day. In the end, the S&P 500 Large Caps and Russell 2000 Small Caps both rose about 6% for the week and the NASDAQ soared 6.6%. What started life as something of a short term over-sold bounce following a largely gruesome three-month slide gained traction as the week went on, on the back of the fact that there was no interest rate hike from the Fed and earnings reports continued to impress for the most part - but mostly because everywhere you looked, there was Goldilockseconomic data pointing to a soft landing.
Despite a continued ratcheting up of death and misery in Gaza over the weekend and zero apparent progress towards any kind of resolution of a looming possible U.S. government shutdown in less than two weeks’ time, an oversold condition resulting from the previous week’s carnage gave stocks hope on Monday and all the indexes moved solidly higher, helped also by falling oil prices and some strong earnings reports, including from McDonalds (MCD).
The warm and fuzzy feeling for stocks spilled into Tuesday as they drifted higher again to end the month of October on an upbeat note ahead of the Fed interest rate decision the following day, but not by enough to save us from a three consecutive calendar month decline in stock prices for the first time since those dark days of early 2020.
Heading into the Fed announcement of its interest rate decision and chair Jerome Powell’s press conference on Wednesday afternoon, stocks remained stable, bolstered by spectacular forward guidance from Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and the release of largely unchanged and kinda Goldilocks Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) data.
The Fed duly followed the script and left interest rates unchanged for the second meeting in a row, as everyone knew that they would. Powell indulged in a rather large amount of hedging when speaking at the ensuing presser with often vague responses to journalists’ questions. He left the door open for further hikes in the future but gave no sign of imminently walking through it.
The market took this as the closest thing that we are going to get right now to a pledge that rates will not be raised any further by the Fed and Treasury yields fell hard, which boosted stocks nicely back into that long-standing recent 4200-4500 range for the S&P 500 index.
Wednesday afternoon had all the feeling of a party starting. But there were still a few poopers out there pointing out that the cops might show and break things up as early as the next day if earnings from Apple (AAPL) were to disappoint or Friday if the latest Jobs Report didn’t cooperate.
The Bank of England kicked off Thursday by following the Fed’s example and left interest rates unchanged. The conviction that the Fed is now finished raising rates over here grew even stronger as Thursday went on and stocks continued the week’s impressive rally leading into those AAPL earnings and then the Jobs Report pre-market the next morning, finishing at the highs of the day.
When it came out after-hours, the AAPL earnings report was underwhelming. The largest holding in the S&P 500 index saw its worldwide sales drop for a fourth straight quarter, marking its longest slide since U2 noticed that it was a beautiful day in 2001. The company is struggling with increasingly sluggish demand in the US and around the world. The results also suggested that Apple is facing an even bigger slowdown in China than originally feared.
On Friday morning before markets opened, the Jobs Report announced that 150k jobs were added last month, a considerable drop from the downwardly-revised 297k from a month earlier and way below what had been expected. The jobless rate rose to 3.9% from 3.8%. This was deemed to be yet another Goldilocks scenario for stocks as it doesn’t make the Fed any more likely to raise interest rates but nor does it undermine the soft landing thesis.
Stocks recently fell to multi-month lows not because of any meaningful deterioration in fundamentals, but instead because an overly optimistic outlook (in part brought about by media puffery over artificial intelligence earlier in the year) has been rattled by unpleasant geopolitical surprises, heightened U.S. political dysfunction and mega-cap tech earnings that failed to meet excessively-elevated expectations, but which weren’t bad in an absolute sense.
As long as those factors (along with higher yields) were driving the market narrative, stocks had a hard time rallying. But underlying fundamentals haven’t changed nearly as much as the decline in stocks in the last three months or so would imply.
The ingredients for a solid rebound were within grasp, and last week the market finally reached out and grabbed them after a few reminders that, broadly, the macroeconomic environment hasn’t materially changed and a soft landing is still the most likely option, although far from certain. For last week’s rally to continue, these reminders need to eventually drown out the dominant noise caused by increasingly distressing geopolitical and domestic congressional issues and the dawning recognition that the A.I. mania in the spring was rather giddy and out of control relative to reality.
At the beginning of the year, traders and investors worried extensively about a U.S. recession as the Fed raised rates by the most in decades. Not any more. Some economic “experts” are not only discarding their fears of a punishing downturn, but seeing a bigger risk that the U.S. economy will be so strong that inflation will pick back up again, forcing the Fed to keep its interest rate options open, as Powell tried to do on Wednesday.
The stock market is confidently reading things differently, however. Referring to the possibility of any further rate increases from the Fed, one senior trader summed up the view of most of Wall Street; “Put a fork in it,“ he said on Bloomberg TV, “they’re done.”
OTHER NEWS ..
Trick-or-treat inflation .. Revelers and generous householders were hit with steep prices for Halloween candy this year after poor weather from West Africa to India spurred a global shortfall of sugar and cocoa. Get your candy hit now though - it’s set to get even worse by Christmas.
Happy Anniversary Elon? .. Elon Musk spent the week in London fronting an A.I. summit (whose government organizers were publicly branded as being “mad and idiotic” to have invited him to do so) including a grotesquely cringe-worthy “fireside chat” with UK Prime Minister Sunak, while marking the one year anniversary of his purchase of X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter.
Just one year on from Musk’s purchase, the entity is now worth less than half of what the supposed business genius paid for it. Restricted stock units awarded to employees value the company at $19 billion compared with the $44 billion Musk bought it for. Since the takeover was completed, a majority of Twitter staff have been gotten rid of or have quit, the platform has lost millions of users, it has seen the number of technical glitches and service interruptions grow at an alarming rate, changes in content rules decided on by Musk himself have resulted in a proliferation of toxic hate-speech, dangerous misinformation and dumb-ass conspiracy nonsense and it has seen its advertising revenue tank over 50%.
It’s Finally Over .. WeWork is filing for bankruptcy according to the Wall Street Journal in a stunning reversal for the flexible-office-space venture that once valued itself at $47 billion (if you haven’t yet, do make sure to watch the excellent Apple TV drama about the rise and fall of WeWork and founder Adam Neumann). The firm missed interest payments owed to its bondholders on October 2nd, forcing it into a default timeline. The extent of the domino effect on vendors and landlords of a huge long term tenant of enormous amounts of office space around the world going out of business remains to be seen, but will likely not be pretty.
On a personal note, as a pre-pandemic former client of WeWork, I am not sure my firm would even exist today without the benefits of my WeWork membership in Manhattan from 2016-2020. Basket case of a company as it clearly was at the C-Suite level, I was lucky enough to interact with some super-professional, kind and amazingly hard-working employees in some of its New York locations and I wish all of them nothing but the very best.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The technical narrative recently switched from hopefully bullish to realistically cautious. The S&P 500’s 200-day moving average has been viewed as technical support or resistance in the near-term depending whether the index is above or below it.
But buyers are finally stirring after having been pretty much on strike for weeks. But investors should not overvalue the meaning of the sharp snap-back rally seen last week. It seems very unlikely that the market will continue to move higher without first establishing solid ground to support an intermediate-term advance.
It may still take a further exhaustion of Supply, followed by the quick return of enthusiastic, broad-based, indiscriminate Demand, to suggest an end to the recent market decline. Stocks must have perceived value to buyers in order for them to enthusiastically swarm in and, in most cases, that means lower prices. I’m not sure that level of lower prices has been reached yet.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Q3 earnings will be this week's focus once again with the S&P 500 seemingly on track to return to overall earnings growth. This week we will see numbers from Disney, AstraZeneca, MGM Resorts, eBay, Uber, BioNTech, UBS, Occidental Petroleum, Warner Bros, Roblox, KKR, Devon Energy, DR Horton and Constellation Energy.
The economics calendar is light, but we will see the Consumer Sentiment index for November.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Mint, the popular free spending and budgeting app, is being shut down at the end of the year.
I have personally test-driven a number of alternatives to Mint and my conclusion is that I like Monarch Money, a paid app, as the best alternative. That’s just an opinion, I have absolutely no connection to or promotional arrangement with the platform.
The Monarch CEO discusses Mint’s demise and how their platform can be a big step-up in user experience for Mint users.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower Corp.) - up 8.2% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor & Gamble, Costco) - up 1.7% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power rose by 24 points last week to 133 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure fell by 20 points to 146over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is just above its 50-day moving average but below its 90-day and is now back above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 58. SPY ended the week *9.0% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 57. IWM ended the week *28.0% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
One week ago: 7.79%, one month ago: 7.49%, one year ago: 6.95%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE (LTMA) ..
One week ago: 24%, one month ago: 37%, one year ago: 38%
A closely-watched measure of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many stocks within the S&P 500 index of the largest U.S. stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below the 200-day moving average which is among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The higher the reading, the better the deemed health of the overall market.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 24% (29% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 26% (28% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 50% (43% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread:↓Bearish by 26 (Bearish by 14 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023?
One week ago: 79%, one month ago: 53%
One week ago: 21%, one month ago: 47%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.56%) being paid currently for the 2-month duration and the lowest rate (4.49%) for the 5-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rose from 0.15% to 0.26%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2-year vs. 10-year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Light shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It was another pretty brutal week for stocks. Last week, the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ indexes both dropped by more than 2% and officially joined the Russell 2000 Small Cap Index by falling below their long term moving averages and into correction territory (defined as down 10% or more from a recent high) and a third straight calendar month of stock price declines is on the cards. The solid 4200-4500 range for the S&P 500 that had been in place since early summer has now broken to the downside, the index closed on Friday at 4117.
A perceived lack of political progress over the weekend overseas in the Middle East and domestically in Washington DC saw markets open on Monday in a depressed mood. The 10-year Treasury interest rate retreating a bit from a 16-year high of over 5% and oil prices ticking lower created a few twists and turns along the way but the S&P 500 still finished the day at its lowest level since May.
Tuesday was a much better day as investors began to get enthusiastic about the possibility of imminent blow-out big tech earnings and treasury yields stabilized - all of which helped prices move higher, particularly for the tech-heavy NASDAQ. After hours, Alphabet/Google disappointed but Microsoft beat expectations.
The Alphabet/Google earnings report, particularly the lower-than-expected revenue from its cloud business, continued to trouble markets on Wednesday, meaningfully dragging down all the indexes, but particularly the NASDAQ which had its worst day of 2023 so far and saw the impressive gains of the day before disappear instantly in a puff of smoke.
Wednesday was also the day that House Republicans finally agreed on the choice of a stolen 2020 election conspiracy theorist, January 6th insurrection apologist and a good buddy of “Team Burn It All Down” in Congress, Mike Johnson from Louisiana, as Speaker and second in line to the position of most powerful human being on the planet. The markets’ reaction was; yeah whatever, but now the real work begins - how are you going to avoid the US government being shut down on November 18th? Because right now we seem a million miles away from any resolution.
Before the market opened on Thursday, we learned that U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth in Q3 accelerated to an astonishingly-high 4.9% annualized rate, more than double the Q2 pace, according to the latest estimate. More interest rate hikes in December or next year, anyone?
Meta/Facebook reported decent earnings but issued a note of caution on ad spending down the line that sent its shares tumbling and it was another stinker of a day with the nastiest aroma again wafting around tech stocks and the NASDAQ.
Tech rebounded somewhat out of the gate on Friday with positive reports from Amazon and Intel but then, alongside rapidly rising fears of a further expansion of military activity in Gaza along with word that US aircraft are bombing Syria, the latest Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation reading was released ahead of the Fed interest rate meeting next week. It increased 0.3% in the last month and 3.7% year-over-year and consumer spending increased 0.7%, surpassing estimates of 0.5%. In other words, inflation is not going lower as hoped.
What did we learn last week? Well, the world of geopolitics looks grim, it’s not always entirely sunshine and roses in the Q3 earnings garden, interest rates in general and mortgage rates in particular keep on trucking upwards (see AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE below) and U.S. inflation seems stuck in the mud and is not going anywhere in a hurry.
And while none of these on their own are yet medium/longer term bearish game-changers, the fact that they are all happening at the same time means that no-one wants to seem like the optimist in the room right now. There’s also a nagging feeling that those quite incredible Q3 GDP numbers just can’t be right for some reason and will ultimately be revised down, maybe heavily.
When it comes to earnings, the problem is not that tech earnings have been outright bad. They haven’t been. But it’s an expectation problem. Tech firms are simply not producing the kind of growth that was universally assumed when artificial intelligence mania hit the markets in the spring and so we are seeing those AI-driven gains given back, entirely as you would expect when the strong bounce higher in stocks in May and June was mostly based on such overly optimistic growth assumptions. The relative failure of these assumptions to play out as hyped has become just another obstacle for markets to face going forward, along with the others I just listed.
Remember, though, that bull markets generally die when excitement reaches a fever pitch. When everyone is fully invested in stocks and there's nobody left to buy - that's when things turn properly south. Today, despite this year's double-digit percent rally in stocks, we're not even close to that kind of euphoria. That is the light at the end of the tunnel.
OTHER NEWS ..
Car Trouble .. Americans are falling behind on their car loans at the highest rate on record. The percentage of subprime auto borrowers at least 60 days past due rose to 6.11% in September, the highest level since Elton John asked us all (and a little lion cub) if we could feel the love that night in 1994. This rise in delinquencies is due to higher car prices and borrowing costs stemming from the Federal Reserve's interest-rate hikes. The resumption of student-loan payments and the expectation that higher interest rates will be maintained higher for longer have only exacerbated the worries that delinquencies will persist and grow.
Beware! Private Equity May Be Coming for Your Retirement Money .. It seems private equity firms are coming for your nest egg. Bloomberg reported that, among the roster of banks and brokerages helping private equity investment firm KKR raise money for some of its newest infrastructure investments, there are two names that stand out; Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Both are well-known for serving individuals, not the pension funds and endowments that typically invest in multibillion-dollar private and lightly-regulated investment partnerships such as KKR’s. But those sources of money are drying up.
Individual investors, by contrast, represent a deep reservoir of untapped riches, particularly in IRAs and retirement plans - administered in large part by the Fidelitys and Schwabs of this world.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Weakness has now spread beyond the level of “a market pullback” that is likely to quickly recover ground. Instead, this level of technical damage apparent in key indicators is usually only resolved through the exhaustion of sellers, evidence of which is scarce right now.
As we can see from the new data point I will now be including in my weekly reports, the rapidly contracting PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE (LTMA, see below) and also the rapidly expanding Percent of Stocks Down More Than 20% From Their One Year Highs (whose 50%+ reading reveals that more than half of all U.S. stocks are now in classically-defined bear markets), conditions are becoming materially worse.
As in physics, market trends tend to persist until acted upon by an outside force. That force is Demand, and it has not yet made its return. Therefore, the overall market outlook remains technically troubled, although a possible short term oversold bounce next week cannot be ruled out.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
A big week ahead.
Around 150 S&P 500 companies are scheduled to report earnings, including Apple, McDonalds, Conoco Phillips, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Moderna, CVS, Caterpillar, AMD, Airbnb, Qualcom, Novo Nordisk, PayPal, Starbucks, Kraft Heinz, Anheuser-Busch, Simon Property Group, Dominion Energy, YUM Brands, DoorDash, Electronic Arts, and CBOE.
But the highlight of the week comes on Wednesday, when the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee concludes its latest two-day meeting. An interest rate decision is due at 2pm ET and Fed chairman Jerome Powell will hold a press conference half an hour later. While almost no-one expects a rate increase this time around (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below), Powell’s words will be carefully scrutinized for clues about any future interest rate plans.
Economists and investors will also be closely watching next week's labor-market numbers. On Wednesday, we get the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) for September. Then on Friday, we get the Jobs Report for October. Forecasts are for no change in the unemployment rate, currently at 3.8%.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
What does history tell us about investing at times of geopolitical turmoil?
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - up 2.1% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - down 5.7% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power was unchanged last week at 109 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure rose by 3 points to 166over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 29. SPY ended the week *14.0% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 30. IWM ended the week *33.1% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
One week ago: 7.63%, one month ago: 7.31%, one year ago: 7.08%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of FOMO and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday.
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS TRADING ABOVE THEIR LONG TERM MOVING AVERAGE (LTMA) ..
One week ago: 35%, one month ago: 39%
A closely-watched measure of market breadth and participation, providing a real-time look at how many stocks within the S&P 500 index of the largest U.S. stocks are trending higher or lower, as defined by whether the stock price is above or below the 200-day moving average which is among the most widely-followed of all stock market technical indicators.
The more a reading is above 50%, the better the deemed health of the overall market and the reverse when below 50%.
Data as of Friday’s market close.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 29% (34% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 28% (31% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 43% (35% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 14 (Bearish by 1 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What will the Fed announce re: any interest rate change on November 1st after its next meeting?
One week ago: 100%, one month ago: 78%
One week ago: 0%, one month ago: 22%
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023?
One week ago: 80%, one month ago: 58%
One week ago: 20%, one month ago: 42%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday’s market close.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.60%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (4.76%) for the 5-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rose from 0.14% to 0.15%, indicating a slight steepening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday’s market close.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It started out so well. There was green all over the board for a while with earnings mostly looking very perky. But in the end, sentiment was overwhelmed by the noise of higher interest rates, Middle East fears, bedlam in Congress, a government shutdown once again looming on the horizon, fears that consumer spending - and thereby inflation - is refusing to die and some rather nasty projections about the global financial system.
Stocks began the week by jumping higher at the open on Monday and maintained their gains for the rest of the session, boosted both by a continued strong start to Q3 earnings season and by signs that cooler heads may be prevailing as Israel plots its next move and the apparent slight lessening of the risks of escalation into a regional conflict that directly includes Iran and other Arab states (and therefore likely to drag in the U.S. and other allies as well). It is this scenario that concerns the stock market, primarily because of the effects it could have on oil prices and the possibility of a resulting global recession.
Whatever you do, don’t stand between an American and a cash register. On Tuesday, we learned that Retail Sales in September, which was expected to rise by 0.3% month to month, more than doubled that rate of growth - soaring by 0.7% and both July and August’s numbers were revised higher. It continues to worry Wall Street that this orgy of spending could still push the Fed into an extra rate hike or two to dampen it down in the interests of dealing with inflation. Stocks hit the brakes, finishing the day fractionally lower.
Gloom swiftly descended on the markets on Wednesday as market interest rates soared again with 30 year fixed mortgage rates briefly touching 8% before retreating (SEE AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE below) and we finally saw a few earnings report disappointments, particularly from United Airlines (UA) and Morgan Stanley (MS). The body count kept rising in the Middle East and the oil price relentlessly followed suit and, as if we needed it, we got a reminder of how dysfunctional Congress is right now with the embarrassing chaos of the ultimately-doomed speakership bid of Jim Jordan.
Thursday wasn’t much better as remarks from Fed Chair Jerome Powell seemed to rule out an interest rate hike after the next meeting on November 1st (no big deal JP, we all kinda knew that already .. see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below) but failed to do so for anytime after that. He appeared to strengthen the “interest-rates-will-be-higher-for-longer” narrative. Stock markets were unimpressed and prices fell further since Fed rate policy is still the most critical driver of medium- and long-term stock and bond performance and Powell’s failure to confirm that it’s game over for rate hikes is a near-term negative.
The misery only further intensified on Friday when a Fed report warned of serious risks to the global financial system brought about by excessive asset valuations (including real estate), over-borrowing both by companies and individuals in the face of increased interest rates and over-leveraging by many financial institutions. Stocks fell for the fourth day in a row with the S&P 500 down a chunky 2.4% for a week that had started so well. The NASDAQ did even worse, losing 3.2%.
In the geopolitical sphere, "we're at the mercy of day-to-day news," according to Charles Schwab's renowned economist, Liz Ann Sonders. JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimonseemed to have become infected with a severe case of recency bias calling this "the most dangerous time the world has seen in decades," last weekend but the stock market was having none of it.
The so-called “fear gauge” measure of expected upcoming market risk and volatility, the CBOE Volatility Index known as the VIX (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below), actually plunged about 11% on Monday, its largest one day drop in months although it drifted back higher as the week wore on and stock prices shifted back lower. It’s still about 75% below where it was in the early days of the pandemic, however.
For all the political and geopolitical noise that will occur in the coming days and weeks in the media, we need to watch oil prices because that is the primary way to measure the extent of the market’s worries about a regional conflict breaking out. If we start heading back towards and through the $100 a barrel level, that will indicate a higher degree of worry that could begin to directly impact stock prices.
This remains a noisy market and it’s being made even more so with the Middle East conflagration. While this noise is intensifying with the escalating geopolitical risks and sometimes contradictory data on inflation and growth, the bottom line is that the underlying factors that have fueled the rally in stocks since late May (and really all year) mostly remain in place for the time being.
But if market interest rates remain high then, while it probably guarantees no more hikes from the Fed, it absolutely does not prompt any rate cuts. And if market rates fall, then that all but guarantees no imminent Fed rate cuts.
Either way, things don’t look good for any interest rate cuts from the Fed any time soon and the problem is that markets have pretty much baked these cuts in to the current level of stock prices.
That is why stocks have been falling so effortlessly of late when it periodically hits home that interest rate cuts are not as imminent as assumed. This will likely to keep a lid on stock prices for a while until Powell decides to become more emphatic about a timeline for lowering rates and we may be waiting quite a while for that.
OTHER NEWS ..
It’s Back To Work We Go ..Work-from-home rates in the US have plunged to the lowest levels since the pandemic. Fewer than 26% of households still have someone working remotely at least one day a week, a sharp decline from the 37% peak. Only seven states, plus DC, now have a remote-work rate above 33%.
Rite Aid Band Aid .. Rite Aid has filed for bankruptcy. The nation’s third-largest pharmacy chain had been in trouble for a while, with rising debt plus legal fees and large settlements tied to the opioid epidemic. Rite Aid is doing the Chapter 11 version of bankruptcy, which means it will keep operating while it does some restructuring and will be closing some “underperforming” stores.
While Rite Aid does have some problems unique to its business, it’s been a rough year for retail pharmacies in general. which has included staff walkouts and a sharp rise in theft and even violence at CVS and Walgreens stores, with more and more products annoyingly but necessarily locked up behind plastic barriers in stores with shorter hours.
Good Show From Netflix .. Netflix is raising prices for some customers in the US, UK and France after posting its best quarter for subscriber growth in years, a sign of management’s confidence in the future even as rival streaming services lose money. The world’s top paid-streaming service said it added 8.76 million customers in Q3, far exceeding analysts’ forecasts and boosting its overall subscriber base to over 247 million. The company credited a strong programming slate and its crackdown on password sharing.
The company has returned to growth as many of its peers struggled to figure out their streaming operations. For example, Walt Disney Co., Warner Bros Discovery Inc. and Paramount Global have all cut costs and fired staff to improve their financial performance. Streaming companies have spent billions of dollars to fund new streaming services that can replace their declining linear TV networks. But most of them lose money.
Netflix had what was bizarrely (to me at least) the most-watched program on any streaming platform over the summer .. Suits, a series that first aired on USA Network and where we got our first glimpse of Meghan Markle years before she would reappear on Netflix in a rather different (!) role years later.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 fell below its important 200-day moving average on Friday for the first time since March and almost exactly a year after its recent lows of 2022 (which was some 15% below where we are now). The NASDAQ ended the week at its lowest point since May.
Positive technical factors (and there are some!) are being overshadowed by the dominant condition of uncertainty in the market. Of course, with the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield approaching 5.0%, war-induced upside pressure on oil prices and another potential government shutdown on the cards, that is not a surprise.
Total trading volume remains sickly, as neither bulls nor bears feel confident enough to press their positions. And still the most problematic sign is that more than half of Small Cap stocks have not been able to lift themselves up off the floor, remaining in bear markets, 20% or more below their one year highs.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This will be the busiest week of the Q3 earnings season, with nearly a third of S&P 500 companies scheduled to report, including Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook, Coca-Cola, Exxon-Mobil, GE, General Motors, Chevron, Boeing, IBM, UPS, Ford, Visa, Verizon, Intel, Merck, T-Mobile, Spotify, NextEra Energy, Comcast and Chipotle.
This week we will also see the first of three advance estimates of Q3 Gross Domestic Product (GDP). On average, estimates call for a 3.6% increase in growth, versus 2.1% in Q2.
Then on Friday, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index for September will be released. The Core version of this number is the inflation rate that the Fed uses to make its inflation-dependent decisions and is forecast to be 3.7% higher than a year earlier, down from August's 3.9%.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The IRS has announced its annual changes to limits and thresholds for next year when it comes to workplace benefits, 401ks, IRAs etc.
I have laid them all out for you here.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 0.1% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) for the third week in a row - down 6.1% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power fell by 7 points last week to 109 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure rose by 5 points to 163over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and fell below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 35. SPY ended the week *11.8% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 32. IWM ended the week *31.4% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
One week ago: 7.57%, one month ago: 7.19%, one year ago: 6.94%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 34% (40% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 31% (23% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 35% (37% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 1 (Bullish by 3 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What will the Fed announce re: any interest rate change on November 1st after its next meeting?
One week ago: 94%, one month ago: 70%
One week ago: 6%, one month ago: 29%
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023?
One week ago: 70%, one month ago: 56%
One week ago: 30%, one month ago: 43%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.61%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (4.86%) for the 5-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell from 0.41% to 0.14%, indicating a severe flattening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Light shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The stock market was open on Monday although the bond market wasn’t and it had its first chance to react to the latest flare up of the conflict in Israel and Palestine that broke out over the weekend. Wall Street tries to frame everything in dollars and cents, because, well, that’s its job - but it can often appear a little dazed and confused when it comes to having to suddenly price in geopolitical risk.
After a predictable dip at the open, stocks recovered to push into positive territory by the close, driven higher not only by bouncing from an over-sold position, but also by the market’s attention being caught by suggestions from Fed officials that the bond market may actually be doing their job for them by driving interest rates higher - the interpretation being that no more rate hikes may be needed from the central bank. Gold and oil prices both shifted higher on the onslaught of news coming out of the Middle East.
The feel-good factor continued into Tuesday as stocks powered higher on the back of more Fed chatter talking down the need for further interest rate increases. Traders also began to position themselves in front of Thursday’s latest inflation figures. As always when stocks move higher from being oversold, momentum was turbocharged by both BTFD’ers and algorithmic and program trading.
Wednesday was quietly positive. The main event of the day was the release of the minutes of the most recent Fed interest rate committee meeting. The main takeaway was that Fed officials now see their policies to be “restraining the economy as intended.” Another up-day for most stock indexes as this apparent central bank mood was deemed to make further Fed interest rate hikes even ess likely.
When the all-important Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation dropped pre-market on Thursday morning, we learned that inflation rose 0.4% from August to September, slightly more than the expected 0.3% pace, while the Core rate excluding food and energy came in right at the 0.3% that was projected. The headline inflation rate remained unchanged at 3.7% annualized, but the (more important, as far as the Fed is concerned) Core version fell to 4.1%, its lowest in two years. Housing-related costs are proving to be particularly stubborn.
While these numbers didn’t move the needle much in terms of expectations (or lack of them) about a rate increase at the next Fed meeting (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below), the apparent stickiness of inflation (also indicated by the previous day’s Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers) did seem to bolster the “higher for longer” interest rate case (fewer and more delayed rate cuts in 2024 than the market has yet priced in) and stocks gave back much of the week’s gains, with Small Caps particularly hard hit.
The world may be falling apart, but the kick-off to Q3 earnings season on Friday showed that banks are still able to make good money. JP Morgan Chase (JPM), Citigroup (C) and Wells Fargo (WFC) all reported positively. The broad stock market, however, meandered aimlessly lower throughout the day, but the S&P 500 just about managed to eke out a fractional gain for the week.
The baseline is still for the Fed to hold rates steady for the rest of the year but non-negligible risks of another rate hike do exist, although the market is still choosing to disregard this risk right now which will make the reaction more violent if it does come to pass.
It always helps to remain focused on the overarching drivers of the markets, and for right now that is still the “Three Pillars of the Rally” that I always talk about (1. No Landing / Soft Landing, 2. Disinflation, 3. Fed Done/Almost Done with Rate Hikes). While these three underlying supports for stocks remain in place the market could well remain largely rangebound within, generally speaking, the 4200-4500 range for the S&P 500. In mid September, the index was at the upper end of that range, trading around 4500. Recently, the S&P 500 has traded down towards the bottom of that range, nearer to 4200.
Aside from U.S. government bonds starting to trade like effing GameStop, not much else has changed. Economic growth remains solid, there are still signs inflation is declining and the Fed is still done, or almost done, with rate hikes. S&P 500 above 4500 seems unsustainable with market interest rates where they are but equally below 4200 is not justified by any data and the still-healthy state of the Three Pillars. So we may be saddled with bouncing around within this range until something breaks.
Forced to choose, I’d say that the list of what can go wrong to break us out of this range to the downside (continued yield spikes, growth slowing significantly, inflation bounce back, more rate hikes, geopolitical shock, oil price surge, banking stress) seems to be a little more on the cards then the list of what could go right to break us north through the upside (more and more Goldilocks data, immaculate disinflation, geopolitical surprise, Fed officially signals that it’s done raising rates).
OTHER NEWS ..
And Another Crypto Demi-God Is Behind Bars .. Three Arrows Capital co-founder Su Zhu is in jail in Singapore after local authorities lost patience following months of stalling and sparring over locating the failed crypto hedge fund’s customer assets. Following a tip-off off that Zhu was headed to Changi Airport from his luxury mansion famous for its lavish parties, they moved in and nabbed him.
Zhu and fellow co-founder Kyle Davies are among the one-time darlings of crypto’s pandemic-era bull run whose reputations subsequently suffered as boom turned to bust, exposing risky practices and widespread fraud.
Three Arrows imploded in 2022 as leveraged bets blew up, starting a $2 trillion crypto rout that contributed to a spate of other collapses in the sector including Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX. Zhu and Davies are accused of failing to cooperate with the probe into the collapse and authorities are seeking to recover $1.3 billion from the two.
Trouble In The Happiest Place On Earth .. Disney (DIS) hiked streaming prices yet again on Thursday as the company continues to grapple with poor profitability and collapsing subscriber numbers. The price increases are the second so far this year and impact the monthly price of the company's ad-free Disney+ and Hulu plans in addition to its ESPN+ subscription.
As a result of the hikes, the price of the Disney+ ad-free plan jumped to $13.99 a month in the US, up from the prior $10.99. That's now double the $6.99 monthly cost Disney charged for the service when it first launched in 2019.
Drown Your Sorrows In Style .. Looking for one of the world’s top bars but can’t get there? Don’t worry. The World’s 50 Best Bars has your back and made a second, less vaunted list offering rankings 51-100. Entries include Martiny’s in New York and there’s even a place in Albania: Nouvelle Vague in Tirana.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 index SPXclosed on Friday at 4328, up a fraction for the week. The next upside resistance points are to be found at 4370, 4425 and 4460. Downside support levels are at 4305, 4282 and 4260.
The overall, longer term trend in the major indexes just about remains to the upside, but beneath the surface, its health leaves a lot to be desired. Basically, this bull market is not checking all the boxes, but conditions still just about remain more bullish than bearish.
The ratio of the performance of Small Cap stocks vs Large Cap ones has reached a multi-year low and is currently below its low even at the height of the pandemic in 2020. What this tells us is that investors prefer owning larger stocks, which theoretically carry lower risk than smaller ones.
I know I keep banging on about it, but here we go again .. such risk aversion to smaller stocks, especially during a bullish trend such as we have experienced since October 2022, is not at all typical of a healthy and sustainable advance for the entire stock market.
Early last week buyers finally appeared to begin taking interest in short-term oversold conditions, although caution remains advised until these buyers fully respond in a more indiscriminate way.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Earnings this week from Netflix, Tesla, Proctor & Gamble, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs Group, AT&T, Johnson & Johnson, Lockheed Martin, American Express, Charles Schwab, Taiwan Semiconductor, United Airlines, American Airlines, Travelers and more.
Retail sales for September and the Leading Economic Index will be highlights on the economic data front.
In housing, we will learn about the latest Housing Market Index, Housing Starts and Existing Home Sales.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - up 2.6% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) for the second week in a row - down 1.1% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power fell by 3 points last week to 116 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure rose by 1 point to 158over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 46. SPY ended the week *9.7% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and also below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 33. IWM ended the week *29.8% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
One week ago: 7.49%, one month ago: 7.18%, one year ago: 6.92%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
GROWTH ESTIMATE FOR THE CURRENT QUARTER GDP ..
Previous quarters .. Q2: +2.1% .. Q1: +2.0%
This data comes from the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model “now-cast”, which is a running algorithmic estimate of real seasonally-adjusted GDP growth for the current measured quarter based on multiple data points as they are released.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 40% (30% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 23% (28% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 37% (42% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 3 (Bearish by 12 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What will the Fed announce re: any interest rate change on November 1st after its next meeting?
One week ago: 89%, one month ago: 63%
One week ago: 11%, one month ago: 37%
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023?
One week ago: 57%, one month ago: 60%
One week ago: 43%, one month ago: 40%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.62%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (4.63%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rose from 0.30% to 0.41%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Light shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“It’s important for investors to take a longer-term view and not let recency bias and short-termism impact their decisions.”
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Stocks eventually ended a little higher for the week but it was a tough slog getting there with interest rates continuing to push ever higher (see AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE below) and a bizarre Jobs Report on Friday.
Monday started out quietly. There was some relief at no government shutdown but an awareness that the can is now lying just a little further down the road and nothing had really changed. Markets quickly resumed their recent short-term path of least resistance by moving lower, with Small Caps once again leading the way downwards.
Tuesday proved to be a very busy, consequential day. Employers reported having 9.6 million job openings at the end of August, according to a seemingly white-hot Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) report, up a mind-bending 690,000 from July, driven by a particularly large surge in professional and business services openings.
Taken at face value, that would seem to suggest that corporate America is ramping up hiring plans once again. On the surface, that is deemed to be highly inflationary. Markets ran with the negativity and Tuesday ended up as a horrible day for both stocks and bonds, with market interest rates surging even higher.
And the chaos in the asylum that is Congress reached new highs (lows?) with the historic constitutional assassination of House Speaker McCarthy driven by a few extremists in his own party. The legislative branch of the U.S. government is now in utter disarray and the chances of avoiding the next shutdown when the current government funding deal ends on November 17th (and potentially many more after that) are rapidly shrinking. An extended shutdown absolutely has the chance to help sabotage a soft landing for the economy.
Wednesday saw some welcome relief as weekly jobless data painted a less inflationary picture than the JOLTS numbers in advance of the big release of the Jobs Report on Friday and oil prices plunged 5% in the session. Interest rates eased somewhat and stock market buyers cautiously dipped their toes back in. Markets drew a breath ahead of the jobs data on a largely unchanged Thursday.
After the blowout Jobs Report came out before the market opened on Friday (see below), stocks’ initial knee-jerk reaction was to crap out on heightened fears that the Fed may now pull the trigger on another interest rate hike before year-end as a result and a strengthening of the “higher for longer” interest rate narrative. A more sober reading of the data as outlined below, however, saw stock prices recover sharply and end the day higher, locking in small gains for the week.
This Jobs Report was widely described as just plain “weird”. It showed a blockbuster headline figure of 336k new payrolls in September, more than double the expectation. The prior two months were also revised up by a combined 119k jobs.
Yet found behind the headline were plenty of details to support the idea that inflation is most definitely on the way down, particularly in an area on which the Fed has been most focused: wages. Average hourly earnings rose only 0.2%, the mildest monthly gain in nearly a year and a half. Also, the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 3.8% in September, despite the enormous increase in jobs created. It was this data that turned stocks around after the initial nosedive on Friday.
Things are just batshit crazy right now in the usually rather boring world of US government bonds with interest rates crashing around like a bird trapped in an small attic. Markets seem to be acting like a precocious toddler, testing the boundaries at which things break. Is it 5% interest rates on your bonds? No? How about 5.25%? Are 7.0% mortgage rates high enough? No? How about 7.50%?
It’s one thing to see extreme volatility in stocks or even junk bonds, we all signed up for that. It’s quite another to observe it in U.S. Treasury full-faith-in-credit instruments whose traditional role has been as buffers to the risk in the stock portion of everyone’s portfolios from most individual investors to banks and pension funds.
The sense is growing that if rates continue to rise the way they’ve been rising, there will eventually be a financial accident somewhere. More bank failures? Commercial real estate finally falling off a cliff? YUC collapses? A housing market crash? Take your pick.
Any of these things could trigger a recession and much lower stock prices and the Fed may well then have to react by beginning to cut interest rates sooner than they plan to and risk looking foolish at best and incompetent and destructive at worst. The problem of course is that by then it will be too late for Fed rate cuts to have any meaningful effect.
In the past few weeks the U.S. stock market has erased all of its gains of the past few months. The summer of 2023 came and went and we have nothing to show for it. As of right now, only 25 out of 500 companies are responsible for the 12% year-to-date gain in the S&P 500 and while that is up from just seven that represented the entire rally back in May, it still shows a concerning lack of breadth and is further evidence of how just looking at index performance does not necessarily give you the full picture of what is happening to the average stock.
OTHER NEWS ..
TGI Thursday lunchtime? .. JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon said artificial intelligence is already being used by thousands of employees at his bank and is likely to make dramatic improvements in workers’ quality of life, even if it eliminates some jobs. The bank advertised for more than 3,500 related roles between February and April.
“Your children are going to live to 100 and not have cancer because of technology,” Dimon said in an interview on Bloomberg TV. “And literally they’ll probably be working three-and-a-half days a week.”
Elon gives the regulator the finger .. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) is seeking to force Elon Musk to testify as it investigates the billionaire’s purchases of Twitter Inc. shares ahead of his takeover of the social media platform. The Wall Street regulator said on Thursday that Musk failed to appear to testify last month as requested,and has now asked a judge to force him to. The agency is reviewing Musk’s statements and disclosures about the stock transactions.
Before acquiring all of Twitter, Musk first purchased a 9.2% stake in the social media firm in March 2022. He did not disclose the stake to the SEC until a month later. The agency’s rules require that people who buy more than 5% of a public company disclose it within ten days.
The SEC began its probe in April 2022 and has requested thousands of documents from Musk and other parties, the agency said. He has apparently only sent a few hundred documents in response, withholding the rest. He originally agreed to sit down for an interview with the SEC last month, but two days before the meeting, Musk suddenly raised several objections, including one that he didn’t want to meet in San Francisco. Investigators even agreed to move the questioning to Fort Worth, Texas, near where Musk now lives to accommodate him - but then he decided that he wouldn’t attend the interview at all.
It’s possible, of course, that he was too busy designing more and more convoluted pricing models to try and make his comically overpriced purchase of the Twitter platform ever so slightly less disastrous.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 index SPXclosed on Friday at 4308, up a little for the week. The next upside resistance points are to be found at 4370, 4425 and 4460. Downside support levels are at 4305, 4273 and 4185.
We are almost at the one year anniversary of the 2022 stock market lows on October 12th. Since then, the S&P 500 Large Cap index is up 20%, the tech-heavy NASDAQ-100 up 38% and the Russell 2000 Small Cap Index up only 3%. Clearly size does matter.
Technical crosscurrents within the market are strong, drawing battle lines between an oversold short-term condition implying higher prices and tentative breakdowns in longer-term indicators suggesting lower ones.
The spread between dominant Selling Pressure and Buying Power continues to widen, although the main driver of this still appears to be more the withdrawal of Demand rather than an alarming intensification of Supply. But until the market is driven low enough to attract robust, broad-based Demand, sellers appear to remain in control.
It may well take a complete exhaustion of Supply, not currently observable, followed by the quick return of enthusiastic broad-based Demand, to suggest an end to the current corrective period that has gripped the market in recent weeks.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The stock market will be open on Monday, but U.S. bond markets will be closed for the federal holiday.
The Q3 earning season starts on Friday, with results from several big banks. Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo will all report, as will BlackRock, PepsiCo, Delta Air Lines, Walgreens, UnitedHealth Group and Domino’s Pizza.
On Thursday, all eyes will be on the release of the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for September. Estimates are for month-to-month increases of 0.3% in both the headline CPI and the Core CPI, that would bring down the annualized rates of inflation to 3.6% and 4.1%.
The Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers will follow on Wednesday with the headline rate expected to be up 1.6% annualized and Core PPI seen rising 2.3%.
Federal Reserve watchers will closely examine Wednesday's release of minutes from the central bank's most recent policy meeting for extra clues about committee members’ thinking.
We will also see the latest Consumer Sentiment Index.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft.) - up 1.5% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 3.2% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power fell by 8 points last week to 119 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure rose by 11 points to 157over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 43. SPY ended the week *10.0% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and also below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 34. IWM ended the week *28.7% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
One week ago: 7.31%, one month ago: 7.12%, one year ago: 6.66%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
GROWTH ESTIMATE FOR THE CURRENT QUARTER GDP ..
Previous quarters .. Q2: +2.1% .. Q1: +2.0%
This data comes from the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model “now-cast”, which is a running algorithmic estimate of real seasonally-adjusted GDP growth for the current measured quarter based on multiple data points as they are released.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 30% (28% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 28% (31% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 42% (41% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 12 (Bearish by 13 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What will the Fed announce re: any interest rate change on November 1st after its next meeting?
One week ago: 82%, one month ago: 53%
One week ago: 18%, one month ago: 47%
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023?
One week ago: 65%, one month ago: 53%
One week ago: 35%, one month ago: 45%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.64%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (4.65%) for the 5-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rates fell from 0.44% to 0.30%, indicating a another significant flattening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Lightly shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
There are plenty of good reasons to not own a home. A Morningstar analyst dives in.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is a U.S. government oversight agency responsible for regulating the securities markets and protecting investors.
The SEC was established by the passage of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, largely in response to the stock market crash of 1929 that led to the Great Depression.
The SEC can itself bring civil actions against lawbreakers, and also works with the Justice Department on criminal cases.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is an independent federal government regulatory agency responsible for protecting investors, maintaining fair and orderly functioning of the securities markets, and facilitating capital formation. It was created by Congress in 1934 as the first federal regulator of the securities markets. The SEC promotes full public disclosure, protects investors against fraudulent and manipulative practices in the market, and monitors corporate takeover actions in the United States. It also approves registration statements for bookrunners among underwriting firms.
Generally, issues of securities offered in interstate commerce, through the mail or on the Internet, must be registered with the SEC before they can be sold to investors. Financial services firms—such as broker-dealers, advisory firms and asset managers, as well as their professional representatives—must also register with the SEC to conduct business. An example: they would be responsible for approving any formal bitcoin exchange.
The SEC's primary function is to oversee organizations and individuals in the securities markets, including securities exchanges, brokerage firms, dealers, investment advisors, and investment funds. Through established securities rules and regulations, the SEC promotes disclosure and sharing of market-related information, fair dealing, and protection against fraud. It provides investors with access to registration statements, periodic financial reports, and other securities forms through its electronic data-gathering, analysis, and retrieval database, known as EDGAR.
The SEC is headed by five commissioners who are appointed by the president, one of whom is designated as chair. Each commissioner's term lasts five years, but they may serve for an additional 18 months until a replacement is found. The current SEC chair is Gary Gensler, who took office on April 17, 2021. To promote nonpartisanship, the law requires that no more than three of the five commissioners come from the same political party.
Their goals are to interpret and take enforcement actions on securities laws, issue new rules, provide oversight of securities institutions, and coordinate regulation among different levels of government. The five divisions and their respective roles are:
Division of Corporate Finance: Ensures investors are provided with material information (that is, information relevant to a company's financial prospects or stock price) in order to make informed investment decisions.
Division of Enforcement: In charge of enforcing SEC regulations by investigating cases and prosecuting civil suits and administrative proceedings.
Division of Investment Management: Regulates investment companies, variable insurance products, and federally registered investment advisors.
Division of Economic and Risk Analysis: Integrates economics and data analytics into the core mission of the SEC.
Division of Trading and Markets: Establishes and maintains standards for fair, orderly, and efficient markets.
The SEC is allowed to bring only civil actions, either in federal court or before an administrative judge. Criminal cases fall under the jurisdiction of law enforcement agencies within the Department of Justice; however, the SEC often works closely with such agencies to provide evidence and assist with court proceedings.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The month of September duly lived up to its stock-killing reputation and there was a strong sense of good riddance from investors as markets closed on Friday. On the bright side, Octobers following losing Septembers have a history of being rather good for stock prices and November to December is historically a strong season.
Last week began with a predictable but mild snap-back rally on Monday after the carnage that had followed the outcome of the most recent Fed meeting the week before. But the relief was short-lived. By Tuesday, markets across the board were back in freefall after consumer confidence and expectation readings cratered and data showed new home sales plunging almost 9% in a month.
The mood was also not helped by announcements that Amazon is getting sued by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and by 17 states for so-called monopolistic practices and that Target is closing nine stores in four states, including one in Manhattan, due primarily to massive levels of organized retail theft (or “an increase in shrink” as corporate-speak calls it) and attacks on store staff.
The market took a breather on Wednesday and ended the day little changed - which was actually quite an impressive performance in the face of a big jump in oil prices that day to the highest level in over a year, a still-ripping US Dollar and the highest 10-year Treasury interest rates since Shaggy strongly protested that it wasn’t him in late 2000, dragging mortgage rates even higher (see AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE below).
And, of course, the sense then was that we had all moved one day closer to the world’s most pointless and unnecessary government shutdown caused by the “Burn It All Down” mob in Congress making a fool of the clueless and impotent Speaker Of The House. In the end, it seems that the can is simply being kicked down the road by a 45-day reprieve in last minute stop-gap measure which means we’ll likely go through all this utterly embarrassing s**t again before Thanksgiving.
Investors came back in with some cautious dip-buying on Thursday, sensing perhaps that things had maybe fallen a bit too far a bit too fast and both surging oil prices and the rocketing US Dollar pulled back a bit. But the buying felt like it lacked any passionate enthusiasm as stock prices seemed to tick up only grudgingly.
Friday saw a resumption of the slide after a brief morning spike resulting from some hopeful inflation data (see below) ran out of steam and hopes of avoiding a government shutdown seemed to evaporate. Wall Street traders trudged home in a horrendous Manhattan rainstorm, which seemed to sum up another gloomy week that ended a pretty miserable month and a difficult quarter (watch out for my Quarterly Market Review in the next few days).
There is a slight whiff of stagflation in the air (the toxic simultaneous combo of high inflation and unemployment and slowing growth, see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) and that is a bad smell for stock markets. Any further data releases that point in that direction are not going to be well received by investors as they may pose an existential threat to the validity of the “Three Pillars” (1. No Landing / Soft Landing, 2. Disinflation, 3. Fed Done/Almost Done with Rate Hikes) upon which this year’s rally has been built. Indeed, these pillars are single-handedly the only rationale for stock prices being any higher in 2023 than they were in 2022 and if they begin to crumble then so could the entire stock market.
The final revision of Q2 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) showed last week that the rate of economic growth in the U.S. was unchanged from the second estimate, holding steady at an annualized rate of 2.1%. We also learned on Friday that the Fed’s favorite inflation measure, the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index increased just 0.1% in August, lower than expected, indicating an annual core inflation rate of 3.9%, in line with expectations.
For a further meaningful decline to occur in stocks, we will have to see: 1) a clear slowing of growth and/or 2) a real rebound in inflation. To be clear, the data is not yet showing either of these right now and that’s a good thing.
Looking forward however, if the data does show either or even both problems occurring, do not be at all surprised by a swift 10-15% fall in stock prices (likely worse than that for tech names and YUC stocks) as the Three Pillars deteriorate. If the data shows that neither problem is happening, the S&P 500 could easily rally back a couple of hundred points higher from here. And, if the data remains mixed, contradictory or inconclusive, then expect conditions to continue to be choppy around current levels until such time as things break one way or the other.
So, what does a “Good” Outcome look like?
More “good” inflation reports, meaning that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Core PCE Price Index are flat or decline further
Goldilocks growth including no decline in retail sales and no spike in consumer credit
Mild and gradual softening of the labor market - monthly job creation in the mid-to-low 100k area, job openings back below 8m.
An end to expected Fed interest rate hikes and at least two rate cuts in 2024.
A solid Q3 earnings season, which begins on October 13th, particularly from the so-called Magnificent Seven, that’s Apple (AAPL), Alphabet (GOOGL), Nvidia (NVDA), Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT), Meta Platforms (META) and Tesla (TSLA)
Any government shutdowns only last for a few days at most.
What does a “Bad” Outcome look like?
Inflation rebounds - CPI and Core PCE Price Index rise
We get a growth scare e.g., retail sales fall, consumer credit deteriorates
The labor market does not soften, meaning unemployment does not rise back up to around 4% and/or job openings remain stubbornly high.
Markets come to expect another interest rate hike (probability viewed as being over 50%) and either zero or only one rate cut in 2024.
Disappointing earnings for Q3 in general, but for the Magnificent Seven in particular
Any government shutdowns last for two weeks or more
OTHER NEWS ..
Less For More .. Buying a home or car right now is proving unaffordable for many American households because of the toxic mix of massively higher borrowing costs and much higher prices. Consumers in the market for loans to buy homes and cars are discovering that, because of the Federal Reserve’s relentless 18 month campaign of interest rate increases, their money gets them a lot less than it did a few years ago. Meanwhile, those with credit cards and other loans that carry rates pegged to broader interest benchmarks like the 2-year or 10-year Treasury rates are finding that their balances have gotten much more expensive to maintain.
A Wall Street Journal report estimates that the typical American household would now need to use 42 weeks of income to buy a new car, up from 33 weeks just three years ago. And, as reported in last week’s issue of Angles, the National Association of Realtors now calculates that the typical American family can no longer afford to buy a median-priced home.
Another One Bites The Dust .. The Wall Street Journal reported that Hong Kong’s criminal investigation into crypto platform JPEX has led to the arrest of at least 11 people last week with allegations that it defrauded investors of $192 million. Police swooped in just days after the securities regulator warned investors that JPEX lacked a regulatory permit and that users had been blocked from withdrawing their funds. and platform providers were ordered to block its website and app locally. Hong Kong’s response comes after it introduced a strict new regulatory regime for cryptocurrencies four months ago.
The WSJ report quoted Lily Fang, professor of finance and dean of research at INSEAD business school near Paris, as saying “This unfortunately shows that allowing retail trading in this space, which is known to be fraud-prone, when investor education is sorely lacking, is a mistake.”
Not A Good Look In China .. The billionaire chairman of the crisis-ridden massive property developer China Evergrande Group was taken away by Chinese police earlier this month and is now said to be under “residential surveillance.” The move against Hui Ka Yan is taking the saga at the world’s most indebted developer from just the financial realm into the criminal. Chinese authorities earlier this month detained some staff at the company’s wealth management unit and two former executives were also reportedly rounded up.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 index SPXclosed on Friday at 4288, down for the week. The next upside resistance points are to be found at 4300, 4350 and 4435. Downside support levels are at 4199, 4181 and 4088.
The remarkably low volume that has accompanied many of the market’s recent down-days is a beacon of hope for stocks from a technical standpoint. Moves on low volume tend to carry much less weight and persistence, implying less urgency and conviction among the sellers. These dips in price have tended to be the result of an absence of desire to buy rather than the presence of a desire to sell.
While the path of least resistance may have shifted lower for the S&P 500 in the near term with market interest rates at cycle highs, the long-term uptrend remains intact but it is one where Large Cap high quality stocks remain in better shape than the Small Cap segment.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS), which comes out on Tuesday is expected to show about 8.8 million job openings in August, pretty much flat with a month earlier.
The Jobs Report for September on Friday is the main event. Expectations are for a 155k increase in payrolls, versus 187k in August. The unemployment rate is seen ticking down to 3.7% from 3.8%.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - flat for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 6.8% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power fell by 4 points last week to 127 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure rose by 7 points to 146over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 34. SPY ended the week *10.5% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and also below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 37. IWM ended the week *27.1% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
One week ago: 7.19%, one month ago: 7.18%, one year ago: 6.70%
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
GROWTH ESTIMATE FOR THE CURRENT QUARTER GDP ..
Previous quarters .. Q2: +2.1% .. Q1: +2.0%
This data comes from the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model “now-cast”, which is a running algorithmic estimate of real seasonally-adjusted GDP growth for the current measured quarter based on multiple data points as they are released.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 28% (31% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 31% (34% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 41% (35% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bearish by 13 (Bearish by 4 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What will the Fed announce re: any interest rate change on November 1st after its next meeting?
One week ago: 74%, one month ago: 52%
One week ago: 26%, one month ago: 48%
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023?
One week ago: 55%, one month ago: 52%
One week ago: 45%, one month ago: 44%
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%). Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.61%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (4.59%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell hard from 0.66% to 0.44%, indicating a significant flattening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday. Light shaded area shows the current Federal Funds rate range.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Time to crack out the popcorn. The long-awaited Sam Bankman-Fried crypto fraud trial finally kicks off this week. Here are the team lineups and a big game preview.
To brush up on your SBF knowledge, I recommend listening to this excellent podcast.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
STAGFLATION
Stagflation is the simultaneous appearance in an economy of slow growth, high unemployment, and rising prices.
Once thought by economists to be impossible, stagflation has occurred repeatedly in the developed world since the 1970s.
Policy solutions for slow growth tend to worsen inflation, and vice versa. That makes stagflation hard to fight.
Stagflation is an economic cycle characterized by slow growth and a high unemployment rate accompanied by inflation. Economic policymakers find this combination particularly difficult to handle, as attempting to correct one of the factors can exacerbate another.
Once thought by economists to be impossible, stagflation has occurred repeatedly in the developed world since the 1970s oil crisis.
In mid-2022, many were saying that the United States had not entered a period of stagflation, but might soon experience one, at least for a short period. In June 2022, Forbes magazine argued that a period of stagflation was likely because economic policymakers would tackle unemployment first, leaving inflation to be dealt with later.
The term stagflation was first used by British politician Iain Macleod in a speech before the House of Commons in 1965, a time of economic stress in the United Kingdom. He called the combined effects of inflation and stagnation a "'stagflation situation."
The term was revived in the U.S. during the 1970s oil crisis, which caused a recession that included five consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. Inflation doubled in 1973 and hit double digits in 1974. Unemployment reached 9% by May 1975.
The effects of stagflation were illustrated by means of a misery index. This index, a simple sum of the inflation rate and the unemployment rate, tracked the real-world effects of stagflation on a nation's people.
Stagflation was once believed to be impossible. The advent of stagflation across the developed world later in the 20th century showed that this was not the case. Stagflation is a great example of how real-world experience can run roughshod over widely accepted economic theories and policy prescriptions.
Since that time, inflation has proved to be persistent even during periods of slow or negative economic growth. In the past 50 years, almost all declared recessions in the U.S. have seen a continuous, year-over-year rise in consumer price levels.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Last week was always going to be about Wednesday’s Federal Reserve meeting and its fallout. We are undergoing a major shift from the question being “How high will interest rates go?” (the market’s obsession over the last eighteen months) to “How long will interest rates stay high?” going forward.
It is now the answer to this second question that will determine if the Fed’s stance is deemed to be hawkish (bad for stocks/bonds) or dovish (good for stocks/bonds). For any rally to continue, markets need, at a minimum, for the Fed to meet current expectations of (almost) no more rate hikes and, ideally, hint at rate cuts sooner rather than later.
The 2023 rally has been fueled by the economy and inflation both being “not as bad as initially feared.” But at this point, the fear has evaporated and as such the market has now lost the power of positive surprises. To fuel another leg higher, we need a new catalyst and the next possible candidate was the endorsement of the idea of rate cuts in early-to-mid 2024.
The Fed has one eye on Detroit. Unions all over the country are under pressure from a membership grappling with monthly bills going up for the basics, from gas to food to child care to be more aggressive in pay negotiations. And this could well have the end result of making higher inflation stickier and harder to kill and possibly pushing the Fed into a more hawkish posture.
When it came out on Wednesday, the announced decision to leave the Fed Funds interest rate unchanged surprised absolutely no-one, but there were some nuggets in the quarterly “dot-plot” data to pore over.
For instance, the median policy maker on the committee now sees core inflation ending the year at 3.7%, down from 3.8% currently and from their 3.9% estimate back in June. As for interest rates, their median projection was for one more quarter-point rate increase sometime before the end of this year. There are two meetings left to do this, in November or December.
But the biggest shift in projections was for interest rates in 2024. The median estimate is now for the Fed Funds rate to end next year at 5.1%, which is a full half point higher than the prediction of last June and only a quarter of a point below where it is now - essentially pricing in just one or a maximum of two rate cuts before 2025.
Bottom line: The Fed used Wednesday’s statement, dots and press conference to send a strong message to financial markets that interest rates are going to stay higher for longer, get used to it.
Stock investors and professional traders were not impressed that their dream narrative of an orgy of interest rate cuts throughout 2024 was being undermined and equity prices fell hard. Tech stocks in particular took a swan dive right after the announcement.
The plunge continued into Thursday, further accelerated by a surprising fall in weekly jobless claims numbers and although the rate of decline eased a little on Friday, it was a fourth consecutive down-day and the S&P 500 index notched its worst week since March. Along with all the other indexes, it’s now moved into oversold territory and at least a short term relief rebound can be expected early this week.
The Fed is trying to read tea leaves in the dark. There are many naysayers and they were especially vocal following the release of the dot-plot projections which appear to assume a very rare, some say almost impossible, “Goldilocks forever” scenario of continuing steady growth combined with a low unemployment rate and inflation falling back to the Fed’s target of 2% by 2026.
Elsewhere, central banks raised interest rates in Sweden, Norway and especially Turkey (up 5% to 30%!) while those in the UK, Japan and Switzerland caused something of a stir by leaving their rates unchanged.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s already-weak position is getting even more fragile as he appears to have now lost control of the scruffy riffraff of radical rebels in his own party who are giving him the finger and becoming even bolder and more manically destructive, now with the full blessing of the likely Republican candidate in next year’s election. As a direct result of this mutiny and McCarthy’s frankly pathetic ineffectiveness in fighting it, a government shutdown (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) next weekend is shifting from being a possibility to a likelihood.
It is estimated that a lapse in federal funding could cut 0.2 percentage points from the quarterly GDP growth rate for each week that it lasts and so an extended shutdown theoretically has the capability to simply by itself tip the U.S. into a recession. A shutdown also risks derailing the timely collection, accuracy and even publication dates of key economic data, which would likely blind the Fed in a fog of ignorance and uncertainty and make future data revisions more dramatic and market-impactful. The Fed always insists it is data-dependent, what's it to do when the data runs dry?
There remain two primary events that could cause see the recent pullback in stocks to spiral out of control. The first is a Growth Scare. Sentiment that assumes a soft landing is still dangerously complacent. If the markets actually start to believe this whole “rates-higher-for-longer” thing (and they’re starting to) then worries about a growth slowdown will begin to rise (especially with a looming shutdown and increasing labor strife), which could easily end up triggering a 5%-10% price decline from here.
The second is an Inflation Rebound. If the Fed suddenly signals it could hike rates more than once (which could happen if inflation bounces back in the next few readings) then that would send market interest rates even higher and weigh heavily on stocks, as the “Fed almost done” and disinflation pillars of the 2023 rally could come under serious attack.
OTHER NEWS ..
Home Affordability Is At Its Worst For Decades .. For the first time since the 1980’s, the median U.S. income is not adequate enough to qualify for enough of a mortgage to buy the median-priced U.S. home (based on a 20% downpayment).
Another Not Great Week For Elon .. Hot on the heels of a biography that described him as a “man-child” and exposed his toxic and bullying behavior as well as having to defend himself against charges of increasing poor judgement calls in that he provided assistance to Putin and Russia by ordering the strategic jamming of internet access to Ukrainians and, bizarrely, quickly jumped in last week to naively tweet his support and encouragement for Russell Brand, the dim-witted, never-been-funny and utterly talentless alleged celebrity rapist, before even looking at the highly compelling evidence of guilt that was publicly released, Elon Musk is now facing off with the Justice Department who have launched a criminal investigation into Tesla’s unsatisfactory disclosure of benefits the company paid him, including a house.
This is hardly Musk’s first rodeo when it comes to playing fast and loose with the truth about his businesses and breaking financial regulations. He paid a $20m fine and was forced to step down as chairman of Tesla after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) found that he lied to shareholders and the public back in 2018 in order to try and manipulate Tesla’s stock price for his own benefit. An increasing number of Tesla shareholders are becoming rather concerned at his tendency towards impetuous and reckless conduct which seems to be impacting their investment. Tesla stock has significantly underperformed the NASDAQ index since Musk took over Twitter in late October 2022.
Flooding Trouble .. A federal program that provides critical flood insurance is set to lapse unless renewed by the end of the month, potentially stranding new home buyers in need of coverage. The National Flood Insurance Program provides a safety net for the increasing number of communities that are vulnerable to flooding and might not have access to any other coverage.
Now lawmakers are deadlocked over extending the program, which is facing a backlash over a new pricing model intended to make premiums better reflect a home’s risk. The new pricing will take several years to be fully implemented and result in rate hikes for two-thirds of the program’s 4.7 million policyholders, according to the Government Accountability Office.
Lack of coverage availability or massively higher rates could drive people out of flood zones, slam property values and even lead to people losing their homes because they can no longer access or afford insurance that is a mandatory condition of their mortgages.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 index SPXclosed on Friday at 4320,significantly down for the week. The next upside resistance points are to be found at 4350, 4425 and 4450. Downside support levels are at 4285, 4257 and 4190.
Small Cap stocks continue to lag the Large Caps badly with Small Cap indexes falling to recent new lows relative to the big dogs last week. This implies that an end to the current consolidation is not yet particularly close at hand.
Trading volume is low all round with the normal summer disinterest unusually stretching well into the month of September, but Demand has been falling at a faster rate than Supply has been expanding, so while weaker Demand leaves the market more vulnerable, without being mirrored by a more-than-equivalent increase in Supply, the extent of the retracement appears likely to remain contained in the short term. A sudden spike in Supply, however, could see things change quickly - and not in a good way.
Up until the rather violent reaction of the second half of last week, the market consolidation had been a rather uneventful meandering gently lower for Large-Cap-dominated major price indexes. But, with Small Cap stocks and other risk sensitive groups (especially tech and tech-adjacent) demonstrating continued relative weakness, substantially increased volatility is back on the table as a distinct possibility.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Costco, Nike, Micron, Accenture, CarMax and Carnival all report their Q2 results this week.
The economic highlight of the week will be the “real” inflation reading, Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index for August out on Friday. The Core PCE, which excludes food and energy components and is the inflation measure most trusted by the Federal Reserve's, is expected to be up 3.9% from a year ago.
Other data to watch next week includes the Consumer Confidence Index, the latest Durable Goods report and the third and final estimate of Q2 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth on Thursday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: UnitedHealth Group, Eli Lilly) - down 1.0% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 5.1% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power fell by 9 points last week to 131 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure rose by 12 points to 139over the course of the week and resumed a dominant position over Buying Power.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 32. SPY ended the week *9.9% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and also below its long term trend line, with a RSI of 29. IWM ended the week *27.1% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 7.18%, one month ago: 6.96%, one year ago: 6.29%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
GROWTH ESTIMATE FOR THE CURRENT QUARTER GDP ..
(Previous quarters .. Q2: +2.1% provisional .. Q1: +2.0% final)
This data comes from the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model “now-cast”, which is a running algorithmic estimate of real seasonally-adjusted GDP growth for the current measured quarter based on multiple data points as they are released.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 31% (34% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 34% (37% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 35% (29% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bearish by 4 (Bullish by 5 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What will the Fed announce re: any interest rate change on November 1st after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 72%, one month ago: 54%)
(one week ago: 28%, one month ago: 46%)
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 61%, one month ago: 53%)
(one week ago: 39%, one month ago: 42%)
Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.61%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (4.44%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell from 0.69% to 0.66%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“It’s not me; it’s the market that got it wrong.” Excuses, excuses.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN
A government shutdown occurs when there is a failure to pass the necessary funding legislation that will finance the government for its next fiscal year.
During a government shutdown, nonessential government offices are unable to remain open; some essential workers must continue to work but their pay may be furloughed.
Veterans' benefits and unemployment payments continue to be paid.
Long government shutdowns impact the entire American economy.
A government shutdown happens when nonessential U.S. government offices can no longer remain open due to a lack of funding. The lack of funding usually occurs when there is a delay in the approval of the federal budget that will finance the government for the upcoming fiscal year. The shutdown remains in effect until funding legislation is passed.
During a government shutdown, many federally run operations will halt. Some organizations may still stay open by running on cash reserves, but once these funds run out, they will also close.
While shutdowns can also occur within the state, territorial, and local levels of government, the term "government shutdown" is usually used to refer to the federal government.
During a government shutdown, the U.S. federal government is required to reduce agency activities and services and cease any non-essential operations (including furloughing non-essential workers).
Some agencies remain open during a government shutdown. These services are those that, if suspended, would endanger the health, life, or personal safety of the public. Essential employees in departments covering the safety of human life or protection of property also remain employed. However, these employees may not earn a paycheck during the time of the government shutdown unless a specific spending bill is passed to fund those work hours.
Essential employees include those working in the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In addition, Both the Federal Reserve and the Postal Service will both continue their operations because neither receive federal funds.
The real effects of a government shutdown are widespread. It may take longer or be impossible to process new loans for homes, businesses, and education. New applications for Social Security benefits and the processing of unemployment insurance will also slow. Death benefits and travel reimbursements will not be paid to the surviving family of service members killed during their military service.
If the government shutdown remains in place long enough, more agencies will close or reduce the services they provide to the public as a whole, and a larger portion of the American population will begin to see the direct effects.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Reuters, Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal all published articles last weekend essentially saying that the Fed is done with interest rate hikes and while that’s hardly new news, it helps counter some of the somewhat negative narratives that are emerging as investors step back to assess the state of the economy and the business cycle looking towards the end of the year.
It’s leading to an increasingly popular stance among traders and investors of “strongly neutral” on stocks and bonds as markets seem to be lacking any faith in pushing things in either direction. Being strongly neutral does not imply no opinion - you do have an opinion; it is that you have no strong conviction at the moment to buy or sell.
There is a recognition that there could be some legitimate negative surprises lurking. A few examples ..
Energy costs are one of the big wild cards that the economy is facing right now. Sustained high energy prices could cause a significant reversal in headline inflation (although not core), forcing the Fed to take more aggressive action than stock markets are prepared for. Gasoline at a national average of $4 a gallon seems to be the threshold where energy prices start to become a more serious drag on consumer spending in general. Oil prices have surged almost 30% since the end of June.
The United Auto Workers (UAW) union began an unprecedented and targeted strike at Detroit's big three automakers (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) – General Motors (GM), Ford Motor (F), and Stellantis (STLA) on Friday, but then promptly announced that they expected to be back at the negotiating table again at the weekend. A prolonged strike has the capability to raise auto prices, significantly harm suppliers and could send shock waves throughout the overall economy.
There are continued and growing worries about a government shutdown on September 30th as the small but loud rabble of Congressional trouble-makers show no signs of developing any degree of financial or economic intellect whatsoever as the deadline nears. They are instead furiously handing House Speaker Kevin McCarthy the bill for the price of his chaotic selection earlier in the year when he won only by making a multitude of promises to all corners of his party.
Last-minute fears of a maybe hotter-than-expected report of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation the following day was a drag on tech stocks on Tuesday. The CPI data can impact all of the Three Pillars Of The Rally (1. No Landing / Soft Landing, 2. Disinflation, 3. Fed Done/Almost Done with Rate Hikes). It also didn’t help the tech sector that the legal problems of Alphabet Google (see OTHER NEWS below) were front and center that day and Apple’s “big product event” was mostly met with a very unimpressed yawn, failing to divert attention away from the company’s potentially serious issues in China.
When the data was released on Wednesday morning, we learned that CPI rose 0.6% from July to August, the largest month-to-month jump since June 2022. Gas prices, which surged 10.6% over that time, were responsible for more than half of the increase. The headline rate of inflation is now 3.7% annualized, up from 3.2% a month ago. But more importantly, Core CPI, which excludes the more volatile food and energy price components, only rose 0.3% in the last 30 days and 4.3% over the last year, a little lower than expectations.
Markets decided that, despite the fact that the inflation genie is not yet back in the bottle, all this CPI data essentially cancelled itself out and that this was basically a nothing-burger. Stock prices just churned sideways for the most part on Wednesday.
The probability of no change in interest rates at next week’s Fed meeting ticked up to a virtual certainty at 99% (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below), although the odds of a hike at the November meeting did inch a touch higher.
Things are not the same in Europe where stagflation (economic contraction combined with still-high inflation) is becoming a real risk and the European Central Bank (ECB), was last week forced to raise interest rates for the tenth consecutive meeting by another quarter of a percent.
When it came out the next day, CPI’s wholesale cousin, the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation faced by manufacturers confirmed the stubbornness of higher prices but with the caveat that a lot of it was down to the possibly temporary impact of higher oil prices and that the Core inflation measures were still progressing quite well in a downward trajectory.
Retail sales also rose by more than expected, Thursday’s data emphasized the refusal of the American consumer to roll over - but since it is measured in dollars spent, some of this can again be put down simply to forced higher spending at gas pumps around the country.
Still, markets were impressed and Thursday saw a nice spike in stock prices, before then giving it all back again on Friday as a huge futures and options expiration exacerbated renewed fears about industrial conflict and the looming possible government shutdown and it ended up being a losing week for stock indexes albeit on very low trading volume, particularly the NASDAQ and tech and tech-adjacent sectors.
There is one more lurking problem under the surface that could bring a sudden end to the seemingly endless consumer spending boom. By the Fed’s own statistics, and backed up by a recent JP Morgan report, Americans have now pretty much spent all the excess savings they had built up during the COVID era from the combination of government stimulus and their inability to spend for months on end.
Over the last couple of years, these excess funds have acted as a buffer to help shield consumers and the economy in general from the damaging effects of high inflation and maintained a eye-poppingly high level of consumer spending month after month. That buffer is now probably gone and if the Three Pillars start to noticeably deteriorate, there is far less protection against a significant and rapid downturn in economic conditions and therefore stock prices.
OTHER NEWS ..
NYC Rents Finally Cooling Off?.. Manhattan’s rental market is showing signs of hitting a limit as prices in August plateaued during what’s typically the most expensive time of the year for new tenants, as reported by Bloomberg. The median rent for new leases signed last month was $4,400, unchanged from the record set in July. The steadiness suggests that renters have reached a breaking point after rents climbed 7.3% from a year ago and are up 35% from August 2021.August is often the peak of the leasing season, with renters looking to move in before the school year starts. But it ended up being a slower month compared with May and June. The number of new leases in August dropped 14% from a year earlier.
The number of available apartments shrunk from July, suggesting that renters are choosing to renew leases rather than braving the market to find a new place to live. Last month, 11% of leases were signed after bidding wars compared with 19% a year earlier.
In Brooklyn, rents also appear to have peaked. The median price was $3,850 in August, $100 less than a month earlier. The number of new leases fell more than 40% from a year earlier.
Google In The Dock .. Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL) was put on trial in Washington DC last week on Justice Department charges that it violated anti-trust laws. The government’s case in the civil trial focuses on Google’s search practices and whether the company used illegal agreements to cut out competitors, harming consumers and advertisers in the process. The case is expected to last until mid-November.
Mexico Is The New #1 .. US-China tensions are rewiring global trade as the US seeks to reduce supply-chain reliance on geopolitical rivals and source imports closer to home. Mexico looks better placed than almost any other country to seize the business opportunities being created by this new Cold War.
It has just overtaken China as the biggest supplier of goods to the U.S., it boasts the world’s strongest currency this year and its stock markets is one of the best-performing. Foreign direct investment is already up more than 40% in 2023. Not since the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in the 1990s has the country been as attractive to investors as it is right now.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 index SPXclosed on Friday at 4450,down a bit for the week. The next upside resistance points are to be found at 4510, 4530 and 4555. Downside support levels are at 4379, 4350 and 4328.
Last week, average trading volume on the New York Stock Exchange fell to a new 52-week low, which lessens the conviction behind whatever moves we are seeing. The August pullback appears to have morphed into a narrow trading range of the mid-4400s to the mid-4500s in the S&P 500 Index and it closed last week right at the bottom of that range.
The last time we saw a trading range like this with very light volume was in early June. Eventually, pent-up Demand took over to send the market higher, as the advance broadened from just the tiny group of Ultra Mega Cap tech stocks. The question for the current market is whether pent-up Demand or pent-up Supply is preparing to take over.
We can’t be sure yet, but there are some clues.There is growing evidence that longer-term indicators are going to be further challenged and it all starts with Small Cap health and performance which is not great right now with some apparently quite intense selling interest out there. A halt to the Small Cap slide would strongly encourage a potential recovery for the entire market. Without it, the dog days of August/September may stick around a while longer - but the preponderance of the technical evidence still points to an eventual resumption of the uptrend after the current consolidation runs its course.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Monetary policy will be in focus this week as the Federal Reserve and other major central banks announce their latest interest-rate decisions.
The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee concludes a two-day meeting on Wednesday afternoon with its interest rate decision and a press conference from chair Jerome Powell.
Market expectations are overwhelmingly that there will be no change in rates (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below). More attention will probably be paid to the updated Summary of Economic Projections (the quarterly so-called “dot plot”) which includes the updated economic forecasts of each of the committee members.
Also this week, the Bank of England is expected to raise UK interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point and the Bank of Japan is deemed likely to keep its rate unchanged. The European Central Bank recently raised its target interest rate by a quarter of a point.
Earnings reports will include FedEx, AutoZone and Darden Restaurants.
This week's economic calendar will feature the latest data on the U.S. housing market. The Housing Market Index, Residential Construction Data and Existing Home Sales all come out this week.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - up 2.4% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - down 2.8% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power rose by 1 point last week to 140 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure fell by 5 points to 127over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is below its 50-day moving average but above its 90-day and its long term trend line, with a RSI of 46. SPY ended the week *7.2% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but fractionally above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 42. IWM ended the week *24.3% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 7.12%, one month ago: 6.96%, one year ago: 6.02%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
GROWTH ESTIMATE FOR THE CURRENT QUARTER GDP ..
(Previous quarters .. Q2: +2.1% provisional .. Q1: +2.0% final)
This data comes from the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model “now-cast”, which is a running algorithmic estimate of real seasonally-adjusted GDP growth for the current measured quarter based on multiple data points as they are released.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 34% (42% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 37% (28% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 29% (30% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 5 (Bullish by 12 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What will the Fed announce re: interest rate changes on September 20th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 93%, one month ago: 90%)
(one week ago: 7%, one month ago: 10%)
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 55%, one month ago: 31%)
(one week ago: 44%, one month ago: 3%)
Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.60%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (4.33%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell from 0.72% to 0.69%, indicating a flattening of the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“You might think you want an expensive car, a fancy watch and a huge house. But I’m telling you, you don’t. What you want is respect and admiration from other people, and you think having expensive stuff will bring it.” More Morgan Housel wisdom.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
BIG THREE AUTOMAKERS
The Big Three often refers to the three largest car manufacturers in North America: General Motors, Stellantis (formerly Chrysler), and Ford Motor Company.
After decades of dominating the U.S. and global markets, the Big Three have lost significant market share to automakers from Japan, South Korea, and Europe.
Competitors of the Big Three automakers include Toyota, Honda, and Nissan, companies that have attracted a loyal customer base for their reliable, fuel-efficient cars.
The Big Three have all invested heavily in the development of electric vehicles, hoping to gain back market share with their new lines of environmentally friendly cars.
The Big Three continue to maintain a large market share in the U.S., but globally, only Ford has been able to capture a market share comparable to other global brands.
The Big Three in the automotive industry is a reference to the three largest car manufacturers in the United States: General Motors Company (GM), Stellantis (STLA), formerly known as Fiat Chrysler, and Ford Motor Company (F). The Big Three are sometimes referred to as the "Detroit Three." All three companies have production facilities in the Detroit area, so their performance has a significant effect on the city's economy. Employees of the Big Three are represented by the United Auto Workers (UAW) union.
The companies' major competitors include international automakers such as Toyota Motor Corp, Honda Motor Company, Hyundai Kia Auto Group, and Nissan Motor Company.
For decades, the Big Three automakers dominated the U.S. and global markets; however, after the oil crisis of the 1970s and the subsequent run-up in gasoline prices, Japanese automakers began cutting into the Big Three's market share. Toyota, Honda, and Nissan attracted a loyal customer base seeking lower-priced, fuel-efficient cars. By the mid-1980s, the Japanese automakers continued their pressure on the Big Three, extending their brands into lines of luxury cars as well.
Since then, General Motors, Stellantis, and Ford have faced a wide array of other challenges, including poor management, labor disputes, and rising production costs. The profits (and losses) of the Big Three are thought to be an indicator of the state of the overall U.S. economy. During the financial crisis in 2009, Chrysler and GM both closed thousands of dealerships, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and were bailed out by the U.S. Treasury through a loan under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).
In the first half of 2021, General Motors was the leading automaker by market share in the United States, capturing 16.48% of the car and light truck market. Coming in second was Toyota, with a market share of 15.01%. In third place was Ford, with an 11.92% market share, closely followed by Stellantis at 11.48% and Honda at 10.02%.
In terms of revenue, the leading automotive makers globally are Toyota and Volkswagen. However, when we take a look at the global market share, we get a much different picture of the Big Three.
In 2020, Toyota ranked at the top of the list, capturing 8.5% of the global automotive market share by brand. Volkswagen came in second with a 7.8% market share, followed by Hyundai at 5.4%, Ford at 5.1%, Honda at 4.8%, and Nissan at 4.2%. Clearly, the Big Three—which once dominated the global markets—have faced strong competition, losing their market share to automakers from Japan, South Korea, and Europe.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
U.S. markets found themselves heavily impacted last week by a number of decisions made from beyond its shores. The United States and China continue to trade jabs, particularly at each other’s tech giants and it’s having an effect on the stock market.
Apple stock (AAPL) is probably the largest holding in most investors’ total market and large cap fund portfolios and it fell hard, swiftly shedding over $200 billion in market value following Wednesday’s report that China now plans to expand its ban on the use of iPhones to government workers at state firms and agencies.
Apple currently earns over 19% of its revenues in China. The company’s woes (which also included a tongue-lashing last week from U.S. regulators about being overly restrictive in allowing access to payment apps) caused collateral damage to stock prices in some other parts of the tech sector last week before staging something of a recovery on Friday.
In the other direction, it was announced last week that the value of Chinese direct investments in the U.S. plunged to below $2.5 billion last year, less than half of 2021’s figure and the lowest since Beyonce first gave her shout-out to all the single ladies in 2009.
In Saudi Arabia, an extension of the country’s oil production cuts was announced and Russia confirmed export limits collectively totaling a drop of 1.3 million barrels/day worth of supply. That sent oil prices soaring to new highs for the year, directly impacting the U.S. economy (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below). This adds further upside pressure on market interest rates, which continues to weigh on Small Cap stocks in particular as these companies are more reliant on debt financing to fund their operations than larger companies with greater cashflows.
President Biden was in India, entering talks with other world leaders (well, minus Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping) at the G20 summit and, a month out from their annual meetings, the International Monetary Fund and World Bank were both subjected to a stern finger-wagging lecture from the U.S. Treasury about their “increasing mission creep” (notably their apparent recent shift to becoming climate change experts rather than financial and economic ones) distracting them from their core traditional roles of being laser-focused on global stability and growth.
While futures markets remain convinced that there will be no Fed rate hike this month (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below), they are repricing the odds for one at the following meeting in November to slightly favor a quarter point increase then and are also beginning to push out the expected date of the first interest rate cut into the long grass of the second half of 2024.
The Labor Day-shortened week kicks off the stretch-run to year-end as well as the beginning of the traditionally rocky period that I mentioned in last week’s report. I want to clearly articulate the two biggest risks to the 2023 year-to-date rally that I believe we need to watch out for in the coming weeks.
Risk #1: Inflation Bounces Back. If inflation doesn’t just refuse to die but actually bounces back and the Fed has to keep raising rates, that will hit stocks and bonds hard as stock valuation will become more and more unattractive (this is what happened in August) and the chances of a hard landing will rise, with potentially disastrous results for stock prices, as this scenario has simply not been baked in to where valuations are right now.
Risk #2: Growth Slows Too Much. The U.S. economy is losing momentum - that much is clear and not, of itself, a bad thing for stocks in the short term. If growth data starts to implode however, then concerns will emerge the Fed has gone too far with its rate hikes. By that point, rate cuts won’t help materially because even if the Fed starts slashing rates, it’ll likely be too late by then to prevent a stock-killing growth slowdown.
The Three Pillars of the Rally that I always talk about (1. No Landing / Soft Landing, 2. Disinflation, 3. Fed Done/Almost Done with Rate Hikes) remain in place for now but if either (or both!) of these two risks above come to pass, that would materially damage the entire structure upon which the whole 2023 rally has been built and at that point the advance would be compromised with potentially serious consequences for stock prices.
I will be keeping a close eye on the data that could give clues about these risk factors, starting with the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) of retail inflation and Producer Price Index (PPI) of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers, both out this week.
News was mixed last week. Stocks reacted nervously when the weekly jobless claims number came out at its lowest level for seven months, somewhat denting recent optimism that the labor market may be cooling down. On the other hand, for the third time this summer, Goldman Sachs lowered its odds of a U.S. recession arriving in the next 12 months to just 15%, down from 35% in March, with only a “shallow and short-lived economic slowdown” expected for this year.
Summarizing the current situation; the data is wavering a bit but still hinting at a soft landing and disinflation occurring, but not as convincingly as before. Expectations are still for an absolute maximum of one more Fed rate hike but the time at which we start to see some potential rate cuts is being pushed further and further out. Treasury yields (market interest rates) are near multi-decade highs.
This current situation reflects; 1) why we’ve seen a recent retreat in stock prices (rising Treasury yields) but also 2) how broader fundamentals are still supportive of stocks around these levels. As such this pullback is, at least for now, still more likely to be a consolidation in a still-upward-trending market than a fully-fledged course reversal.
OTHER NEWS ..
Turkey Doesn’t Fk About With Its Crypto Fraudsters .. Disgraced ex-crypto pin-up boy Sam Bankman-Fried is just weeks away from his splashy New York trial on charges of fraud and theft related to the collapse of his crypto exchange FTX which cost clients and investors billions of dollars. It could well see him sent to prison for a pretty solid stretch. There may be a little part of him, however, that is relieved he wasn't captured in Turkey where Faruk Fatih Ozer, who ran a local exchange called Thodex until it imploded in 2021 losing crypto investors there a reported $2.1 billion, was just convicted of fraud and sentenced last week to a prison sentence of 11,196 years.
Not Too Much Of An Impact .. Student loan debt repayments resume on October 1st after a three plus-year hiatus. Despite some hysterical articles that have appeared lately, the restart of student loan payments will likely not have any substantial impact on the overall economy, just as their suspension barely moved the needle in macro terms back in 2020 (it was the stimulus package and Fed actions that did). Not to downplay the effect that this can have on many individuals and maybe even a few specific sectors as borrowers recalibrate their discretionary income, the numbers just aren’t big enough in the context of a $20 trillion economy to be anything more than a slight drag.
Estimates for average monthly payments vary, but most sources put the average monthly student loan payment between $200-$400/month. If we take a true worst-case scenario and assume that all of the 40 million existing borrowers pay the the top end of that range at $400/month (which is not even close to accurate as so many borrowers are on reduced payment plans based on profession, income, length of the loan, etc.) then the “cost” to the U.S. economy over the next year would be about $192 billion (40 million x $4,800), not even 1% of its aggregate value.
Health Insurance Costs On The Up ..Costs for employer health coverage are expected to surge around 6.5% for 2024, potentially the biggest increase in more than a decade, according to an article in the Wall Street Journal. Hospitals’ higher labor costs and heavy demand for new and expensive drugs are among the factors behind the faster cost growth. Workers could well end up paying more out of their paychecks for coverage, although employers are generally expected to take on the lion’s share of the increase.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 index SPXclosed on Friday at 4457,down some for the week. The next upside resistance points are to be found at 4475, 4555 and 4586. Downside support levels are at 4420, 4370 and 4350.
There are several pieces of evidence suggesting a likely unresolved period of volatility over the coming days and weeks. The first relates to investor risk appetite. The behavior of Small Cap stocks is usually a clear indication of how committed to a trend investors really are. When Small Cap stocks can attract and maintain Demand, it implies that buying interest is broad-based, which usually secures and extends the life of uptrends. However, of late, Small Cap relative strength vs. that of its Big and Mid Cap cousins has completely crumbled, making smaller name, lower quality stocks a risky place to be right now.
Additionally, Lowry’s Buying Power measure (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below) has been lethargic for a while now while Selling Pressure, which is close to shifting into the dominant position, has been relatively vibrant of late.
However, the bulk of Lowry’s most important intermediate-term and longer-term indicators remain just about intact in their general uptrends, but with potentially meaningful near-term uncertainty, both caution and patience are advisable.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The latest inflation data will be this week's main event. A few company reports and investor days, an Apple iPhone-unveiling event and a European Central Bank interest-rate decision round out the other highlights.
Oracle and Adobe report this week. Moderna hosts an investor day on Tuesday. Apple is hosting a product event on Tuesday, where it is expected to announce its iPhone 15 and other hardware. The U.S. Department of Justice should finally bring its three-year-old antitrust case against Google to trial this week.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) of retail inflation for August comes out on Wednesday morning. Consensus estimates are for a 3.6% year-over-year increase in the headline index and a 4.4% rise in the Core CPI, which excludes food and energy components. The next day the August Producer Price Index (PPI) of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers will be released.
The latest Retail Sales data for August will be out on Thursday and Consumer Sentiment Index on Friday.
The European Central Bank will announce a monetary-policy decision on Thursday. Futures pricing is anticipating no change in interest rates.
Finally, the current contract between the United Auto Workers (UAW) and the Big Three automakers expires at 11:59 P.M. on Thursday. The UAW have authorized a strike if no contract is agreed upon by the deadline.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - up 1.4% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Industrials (two biggest holdings: Caterpillar, Union Pacific) - down 2.9% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power fell by 10 points last week to 139 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure rose by 4 points to 132over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is below its 50-day moving average but above its 90-day and its long term trend line, with a RSI of 50. SPY ended the week *6.7% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 40. IWM ended the week *24.2% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 7.18%, one month ago: 6.96%, one year ago: 5.89%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
GROWTH ESTIMATE FOR THE CURRENT QUARTER GDP ..
(Previous quarters .. Q2: +2.1% provisional .. Q1: +2.0% final)
This data comes from the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model “now-cast”, which is a running algorithmic estimate of real seasonally-adjusted GDP growth for the current measured quarter based on multiple data points as they are released.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 42% (33% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 28% (32% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 30% (35% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 12 (Bearish by 2 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What will the Fed announce re: interest rate changes on September 20th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 94%, one month ago: 86%)
(one week ago: 6%, one month ago: 14%)
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 5%, one month ago: 9%)
(one week ago: 62%, one month ago: 64%)
(one week ago: 33%, one month ago: 27%)
Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.60%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (4.26%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rose from 0.69% to 0.72%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Do you dollar-cost-average in bear markets? I hope so.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
OIL PRICES AND THE ECONOMY
Over the past decade, the U.S. has begun producing more oil, decreasing reliance on imports.
As a result, new jobs have been created in the U.S., but oil exploration and extraction are expensive and highly capital-intensive.
That also means that oil prices impact the domestic oil sector more directly, with jobs and profits linked to the price of oil.
As consumers of oil, however, lower prices still benefit most consumers with cheaper gasoline and travel as well as lower prices of many manufactured goods.
In the 1990s and early 2000s, the United States was struggling under declining domestic oil production and the resulting need to import more oil. Wells in Texas and other regions were still producing, but falling far short of meeting growing energy demands. In the latter half of the 2000s, however, new technology allowed companies to economically draw oil and gas from shale deposits that were once considered depleted because the cost of extraction would be impractical.
Higher prices per barrel of oil also helped to justify the cost of a hydraulically fractured well (also known as fracking). The United States is once again one of the top producers of oil and gas. Greater domestic oil production is a net positive for the United States. However, as an oil-producing country (and not just an oil consumer), the United States now also feels an unpleasant pinch when oil prices drop.
The price of oil influences the costs of other production and manufacturing across the United States. For example, there is a direct correlation between the cost of gasoline or airplane fuel to the price of transporting goods and people. A drop in fuel prices means lower transport costs and cheaper airline tickets. As many industrial chemicals are refined from oil, lower oil prices benefit the manufacturing sector.
Before the resurgence in U.S. oil production, drops in the price of oil were largely viewed as positive because they lowered the price of importing oil and reduced costs for the manufacturing and transport sectors. This reduction of costs could be passed on to the consumer. Greater discretionary income for consumer spending can further stimulate the economy. However, now that the United States has increased oil production, low oil prices can hurt U.S. oil companies and affect domestic oil industry workers.
Conversely, high oil prices add to the costs of doing business. And these costs are area also ultimately passed on to customers and businesses. Whether it is higher cab fares, more expensive airline tickets, the cost of apples shipped from California, or new furniture shipped from China, high oil prices can result in higher prices for seemingly unrelated products and services.
There are also environmental issues that accompany higher output via fracking, in both monetary, regulatory, and political costs, which need to be examined when looking at the impact of the industry on the U.S. economy today.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
A reasonably solid last few days of the month wasn’t enough to rescue August from being the first losing month for stocks since February, with the Large Cap S&P 500, the tech-heavy NASDAQ-100 and the Small Cap Russell 2000 losing 1.8%, 2.2% and 4.5% respectively.
We're now heading into what is often the rockiest part of the year. September is the only month to have historically seen more stock market declines than advances over the years and October has previously hosted some of the most spectacular bouts of volatility.
This particular September/October period carries its own additional risk with the quietly-growing possibility of a shutdown of the US government on September 30th as the “burn it all down” rabble in Congress seems once again determined to wreak havoc with any proposed government funding measures.
It was a data-packed week with a lot for analysts, investors and assorted nerds like me to pore over.
Q2 Gross Domestic Product (GDP, see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) increased at a 2.1% annualized rate last quarter according to the second of three estimates of US GDP for the April-June period. That was a revision down from the 2.4% pace reported in the initial estimate, but still a fraction higher than the final number from Q1. Meanwhile, the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow model (see GROWTH ESTIMATE FOR THE CURRENT QUARTER GDP below) is still spitting out a monster 5.6% GDP growth rate estimate for the currentQ3. That's based on the July and August data that has come in so far.
The latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) showed that US job openings fell by more than expected to just over 8.8 million - the lowest level since 2021. This offered fresh evidence that labor demand is finally slowing down meaningfully. The quit rate fell back to its pre-pandemic level of 2.3%, so that whole Great Resignation thing is now over.
The Fed’s fave, the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index of inflation held steady last month. Separate data showed that consumer confidence has dropped amid souring views on jobs and higher borrowing costs.
And then we had the Big Daddy of economic data on Friday morning, the Jobs Report for August showed payrolls up by 187k, a bit above estimates of 170k but the previous two monthly increases were revised lower. However, unemployment surprisingly jumped from 3.5% to 3.8%, the highest since February 2022 and average hourly earnings have increased by 4.3% from a year ago, a touch below expectations. This was considered to be all very Goldilocks.
The conclusion drawn from all this is that the economy is undergoing a controlled cooling which was seen to further reduce (maybe even entirely snuff out) any lingering risk that the Fed will raise interest rates again at its September 19th/20th meeting with Fed Chair Jerome Powell widely expected to call a time out on the rate hike process.
Yet again, we saw a number of examples last week of a relatively orderly deterioration in economic conditions sending stocks ripping higher. However we need to remember that ongoing bad economic data is not good for markets in the medium and longer term, as stocks much prefer resilient growth and higher (but stable) market interest rates rather than collapsing growth and plummeting yields.
So far, recent declines in stocks and the uptick in volatility have been more a function of previously unrealistically optimistic expectations and not some sudden, materially negative shift in fundamentals, as that simply hasn’t happened yet. But stocks have aggressively priced in essentially no damage to the Three Pillars of the Rally (1. No Landing / Soft Landing, 2. Disinflation, 3. Fed Done/Almost Done with Rate Hikes).
If we get a pile-on of negative news, namely disappointing growth data that raises significant hard landing worries, a rebound in inflation or Powell hinting that rates will rise further, then the Three Pillars will begin to erode and things could get ugly quite quickly with a give-back of much or even all of the entire year’s gains not out of the question.
Based on facts as they are now, there is no reason to think that a hard landing is any more likely now than it was months ago, nor that inflation is about to reverse its recent decline - but I will be keeping a cautious eye on things as the consequences of such developments would be significantly damaging to stock prices.
OTHER NEWS ..
NFTs’ Life Support Could Soon Be Switched Off .. Remember all the ridiculous ballyhoo back in 2021? Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) were the can’t-miss next thing, the future of art and culture. People were quitting their jobs, cleaning out their savings and retirement funds and stealing from their parents just so they could buy pictures of basketball players or penguins for insane sums of money ranging into the millions of dollars. Celebs were lining up around the block to promote such nonsense. If you didn’t own at least one, you were an idiot loser - too blind and stupid to see the glorious future of NFTs.
Well, that brave new world has now pretty much crumbled to dust. Billionaires Steve Cohen and Mark Cuban have both thrown in the towel and are shutting down the NFT marketplaces they backed, Recur and Nifty respectively, due to “unforeseen challenges” , “investment opportunities that didn’t pan out.” and other such gibberish corporate-speak excuses for having got swept up in a mania and ploughed huge sums of money into something that was always going to fail. Another leading NFT marketplace, Blur, has seen its sales volume drop by 96% and is apparently considering corporate hara-kiri as well.
The final nail in the NFT coffin could well be hammered home soon with a potential regulatory crackdown. On Monday, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took its first enforcement action on NFTs, alleging that they are really unregistered securities and whatever piddly trading volume remains is actually illegal anyhow.
Bitcoin ETF? .. Grayscale Investments took one step forward toward launching a spot-based bitcoin (BTC) exchange traded fund (ETF) in the U.S., after judges overturned a previous ruling on Tuesday. Such an ETF would be tied to the spot bitcoin price and could potentially draw billions of dollars from everyday investors. The ruling to overturn the SEC's initial block sent bitcoin's price higher. The wait goes on, but we may be closer.
Credit Cards Might Just Become Even More Expensive To Use ..Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA) aim to generate an additional $502 million by increasing merchant fees over the coming months – with a sizable portion applied to online purchases. The extra revenue will largely come from network fees and swipe fees for transactions. Fee increases have drawn attention to the ongoing tension between credit-card networks and merchants of all sizes, who often pass additional expenses on to card-users.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 index SPXclosed on Friday at 4516,up nicely for the week. The next upside resistance points are to be found at 4541, 4577 and 4607. Downside support levels are at 4488, 4465 and 4450.
A little over half the stocks in the S&P 500 are above their 200-day moving averages and a little under half are below. Normally, you would consider that to be a neutral reading, but the capitalization-weighted S&P 500 (the larger the company, the higher its weight in the index) is up 19% so far this year, while the equal-weighted S&P 500 index (all 500 stocks are weighted equally at 0.2% of the index each) is only up 7%, which is a clear indication of how essential the big names (mostly the so-called “Magnificent Seven”; Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook, Amazon, Nvidia and Tesla) have been to this whole 2023 rally and how the index could fall quite sharply and quite quickly if those big names start to roll over.
Given how much they have advanced this year on the back of what is pretty much universally agreed to be overly positive sentiment, this scenario is entirely plausible, but unless or until we see this start to happen, stocks are still considered to be in a technically positive overall trend.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
U.S. stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday for Labor Day. Investors will return from the long weekend to a very light week of data releases after last week’s deluge.
A few companies like Kroger, Intuit and Danaher are still left to report but most analysts’ attention will be focused on the Institute for Supply Management's August Services Purchasing Managers’ Index for a snapshot of how the service sector of the economy is doing. The Fed really cares about this reading. Put very simply, it’s a 0-100 index and if it’s above 50 then it’s good news for the economy and if it’s below 50 it’s not.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - up 3.6% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 1.5% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US stock market Buying Power rose by 3 points last week to 149 and that of US stock market Selling Pressure fell by 10 points to 128over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is now above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 59. SPY ended the week *5.6% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is now above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 59. IWM ended the week *21.3% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 7.23%, one month ago: 6.90%, one year ago: 5.66%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
GROWTH ESTIMATE FOR THE CURRENT QUARTER GDP ..
Q3: +5.6%
(Previous quarters .. Q2: +2.1% provisional .. Q1: +2.0% final)
This data comes from the Atlanta Fed which periodically issues its GDPNow model “now-cast”, which is a running algorithmic estimate of real seasonally-adjusted GDP growth for the current measured quarter based on multiple data points as they are released.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
AAII US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 33% (32% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 32% (32% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 35% (36% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 2 (Bearish by 4 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What will the Fed announce re: interest rate changes on September 20th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 81%, one month ago: 82%)
(one week ago: 19%, one month ago: 18%)
Where will interest rates be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 3%, one month ago: 9%)
(one week ago: 43%, one month ago: 62%)
(one week ago: 54%, one month ago: 29%)
Based on the Fed Funds rate (currently 5.375%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.58%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (4.18%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell from 0.78% to 0.69%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
For many investors, their actual investment returns can be 20% lower than the returns of what they are invested in. Huh??
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
Gross domestic product is the monetary value of all finished goods and services made within a country during a specific period.
GDP provides an economic snapshot of a country, used to estimate the size of an economy and its growth rate.
GDP can be calculated in three ways, using expenditures, production, or incomes and it can be adjusted for inflation and population to provide deeper insights.
Real GDP takes into account the effects of inflation while nominal GDP does not.
Though it has limitations, GDP is a key tool to guide policymakers, investors, and businesses in strategic decision-making.
The calculation of a country’s GDP encompasses all private and public consumption, government outlays, investments, additions to private inventories, paid-in construction costs, and the foreign balance of trade. Exports are added to the value and imports are subtracted.
Of all the components that make up a country’s GDP, the foreign balance of trade is especially important. The GDP of a country tends to increase when the total value of goods and services that domestic producers sell to foreign countries exceeds the total value of foreign goods and services that domestic consumers buy. When this situation occurs, a country is said to have a trade surplus.
If the opposite situation occurs—that is, if the amount that domestic consumers spend on foreign products is greater than the total sum of what domestic producers are able to sell to foreign consumers—it is called a trade deficit. In this situation, the GDP of a country tends to decrease.
GDP can be computed on a nominal basis or a real basis, the latter accounting for inflation. Overall, real GDP is a better method for expressing long-term national economic performance since it uses constant dollars.
Let's say one country had a nominal GDP of $100 billion in 2012. By 2022, its nominal GDP grew to $150 billion. Prices also rose by 100% over the same period. In this example, if you looked solely at its nominal GDP, the country's economy appears to be performing well. However, the real GDP (expressed in 2012 dollars) would only be $75 billion, revealing that an overall decline in real economic performance actually occurred during this time.
Nominal GDPis an assessment of economic production in an economy that includes current prices in its calculation. In other words, it doesn’t strip out inflation or the pace of rising prices, which can inflate the growth figure.
All goods and services counted in nominal GDP are valued at the prices that those goods and services are actually sold for in that year. Nominal GDP is evaluated in either the local currency or U.S. dollars at currency market exchange rates to compare countries’ GDPs in purely financial terms.
Nominal GDP is used when comparing different quarters of output within the same year. When comparing the GDP of two or more years, real GDP is used. This is because, in effect, the removal of the influence of inflation allows the comparison of the different years to focus solely on volume.
Real GDP is an inflation-adjusted measure that reflects the number of goods and services produced by an economy in a given year, with prices held constant from year to year to separate out the impact of inflation or deflation from the trend in output over time. Since GDP is based on the monetary value of goods and services, it is subject to inflation.
Rising prices tend to increase a country’s GDP, but this does not necessarily reflect any change in the quantity or quality of goods and services produced. Thus, by looking just at an economy’s nominal GDP, it can be difficult to tell whether the figure has risen because of a real expansion in production or simply because prices rose.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
There’s a very accurate saying that that you can win just about any financial argument you like by simply adjusting the start and end dates of a scenario. There’s a perfect example of this on show right now with the most important question of all to investors.
Is what we have seen over the last few weeks a temporary pullback within what is still a bull (rising) market that dates back to March of this year .. or .. is what we have seen over the last few months a temporary rally within what is still a bear (falling) market that dates back to the end of 2021?
The highly-respected and influential Charles Schwab Chief Investment Analyst, Liz Ann Sonders, climbed off the fence last week and put herself squarely in the second camp, saying that she now thinks that what we are currently witnessing is the death of the March-July rally and a reversion back to the declining trend that began in late 2021. The implication being, of course, that the S&P 500 lows of October 2022 (which are about 20% below where we are now) could well be tested again.
Terrified as I am to go up against Liz Ann who I admire immensely, I am personally still hanging on to the opposite view to her (albeit by a narrower and narrower thread); that 2023’s stock market rally is currently being interrupted rather than terminated.
On Monday, oversold stocks bounced back from a miserable couple of weeks with the most-beaten down names coming back the most vigorously. This was despite yet another day of rising market rates with 16-year interest rate highs being reached by the 10 Year Treasury Bond. By the next day, however, a “Sell The Rally”mentality seemed to have taken over with stock investors taking the opportunity of Monday’s spike to sell and lock in profits.
Tuesday’s sour tone was not helped by Standard & Poor’s ratings agency downgrading the credit ratings of several regional banking lenders including KeyCorp (KEY), Comerica (CMA), Valley National Bancorp (VLY), UMB Financial (UMBF), and Associated Banc-Corp (ASB), citing liquidity concerns.
Wednesday was dominated by giddy excitement over the upcoming after-the-close earnings release of chip maker Nvidia (NVDA) and markets shifted nicely higher again in anticipation. After the bell, we learned that the company had indeed absolutely crushed earnings and revenue expectations. It reported $13.5 billion in revenue for Q2, up an astonishing 88% from Q1. It also projected Q3 revenue to hit $16 billion. Sales were more than double those from the same quarter a year previously. All these numbers blew away analysts’ estimates.
But any broader feel-good effects from Nvidia’s outstanding results proved to be only fleeting once things opened on Thursday. The market doesn’t generally discount the same information twice (remember it was the spectacular Q1 results from Nvidia that had already driven the stock price up by nearly 50% since May) and by lunchtime, markets were down in the dumps again as concerns grew about what Chairman Jerome Powell might say (and not say) the next day at the Federal Reserve’s equivalent of its Burning Man festival in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Wednesday’s handsome market gains were quickly extinguished by a pretty ugly Thursday decline.
Powell made his much-anticipated speech on Friday morning and it can be summed up in four words: “This ain't over yet.” He sent no explicit signals about the Fed's immediate intentions on interest rates, but his comments set the stage for the central bank to hold things steady or raise interest rates further in the months ahead, if needed - while dismissing the possibility of interest rate cuts any time soon.
Markets weren’t sure how to react at first. Stocks, bonds and the US dollar all see-sawed in the hours following the speech before finally seeming to decide that actually Powell hadn’t really said anything new and stocks shifted solidly higher in the afternoon, helped by the investors finally deciding to flip the recent script and “Buy The Dip” (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below). It was this that helped rescue what was a volatile, topsy-turvy five days. The S&P 500 and NASDAQ-100 both somehow ended up in the green for the week.
Bottom line, the market of 2023 in many ways resembles the current political climate in this country in that it is being defined by hyperbolic extremes. We started the year with everyone deathly afraid of a catastrophic and unavoidable recession, 1970’s style inflation and 1970’s-style interest rates. None of that happened and at some point markets decided that the Wicked Witch was dead and it was now blue skies all the way. Stocks ripped higher on a runaway train powered mostly by overly-positive sentiment (partly due to AI-mania) and extreme greed as measured by the FEAR & GREED INDEX (see below). But just because Armageddon did not come to pass when it was expected to, it is still entirely possible that:
a significant and rather painful economic slowdown will occur,
inflation will not magically crash to late 20-teens levels in the near future,
the Fed may actually be telling the truth and will not suddenly set about cutting interest rates soon (which is what markets had priced in at the end of July when the S&P 500 was flirting with closing above 4,600).
The eventual truth likely lies in the middle somewhere and that’s where markets are sitting right now, as demonstrated by the day-to-day indecisive up/down/up/down/up dynamic that we saw last week. Where we go from here - and how quickly - in the coming weeks is critical to the health, or even the continued existence, of the 2023 rally.
OTHER NEWS ..
Car Trouble .. Auto-loan delinquencies are surging. Just one new car model now sells for less than $20k - down from about a dozen just five years ago. Considerably higher interest rates are only making buyers’ situations even more difficult. The average interest rate charged for a new car loan is now 9.5%, according to Cox Automotive. There aren’t many bargains on the used-car lot either, where the average vehicle lists for about $27k - up more than 30% from pre-pandemic levels. For used car loans, the average interest rate is higher, at almost 14%.
These numbers could explain why, despite a strong jobs market and robust wage growth, seasonally-adjusted rates of severe delinquency for car loans are the highest since James Blunt squealed that you’re beautiful in 2006. Clearly, an increasing number of consumers cannot afford the auto loans that they are taking on.
Airbnb Crackdown .. Thousands of New York City Airbnb listings are vanishing from the marketplace. The city is about to clamp down on all Airbnb rentals. NYC officials say that, starting on September 5th, they will be more aggressively enforcing rules on short-term rentals, including already-existing requirements that hosts must first register with the city and not rent out an entire apartment or home. Hosts are also required to be present at the property during their guests’ short-term stays. In response and in preparation for the crackdown, NYC listings are being rapidly removed from the platform.
New York’s enforcement is one of the more high-profile recent examples of cities coming down hard on short-term rentals. There were recently over 38k Airbnb listings in the city, not counting hotels that list on the platform. The annual net revenue for these listings is over $85 million. The city estimates there are about 11k illegal short-term rentals citywide.
How Much To Move? .. The lowest annual pay that would entice the average American worker to switch jobs hit a record high $78,645 in July. The so-called “national reservation wage” is up from $72,900 a year earlier, a New York Fed survey showed. And while the pay demand by women rose 11%, twice as fast as for men, they’re not asking for as much. Men want about $91k to jump jobs, while women are looking for about $25k less.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 index SPXclosed on Friday at 4406,up a little for the week. The next upside resistance points are to be found at 4425, 4439 and 4453. Downside support levels are at 4355, 4320 and 4290.
Despite passing the milestone last week of 600 days without a new market high (something that felt like almost a weekly occurrence at times back in late 2020 and much of 2021), most meaningful indicators of demand, breadth, and momentum remain above their March lows, and while that condition persists, the dominant uptrend should remain intact from a technician’s standpoint.
Stock markets shifted quickly from fully overbought to fully oversold in the space of less than four weeks culminating in last Thursday’s big down day. Friday’s rebound may well have been partly as a result of that oversold condition.
This has created an important technical inflection point for the stock market. It passed its first test, but if it fails to consistently and decisively rebound from any future fully oversold short term conditions, then the primary trend could well change direction once again, this time for the worse.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
New data on the U.S. labor market will be this week's highlight, as well as a few more earnings reports plus the latest inflation data.
Best Buy, Hewlett Packard, Salesforce, Broadcom, Dollar general and Campbell Soup will all report this week.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) will publish the results of the July Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS). Forecasts are for available job openings to hold about flat from a month earlier.
Then on Jobs Day Friday, a gain of 175k payrolls for August is expected - which would be another small deceleration from the prior month. The unemployment rate is forecast to hold steady at 3.5%. Average hourly earnings are seen rising 0.4% month-over-month, matching July's pace.
A 0.3% rise in income and a 0.7% increase in spending for last month is expected in the latest release of the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure, the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (Core PCE) price index (the one that excludes food and energy prices), which would indicate core inflation to be at 4.2% year over year.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower) - up 1.59% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - down 0.75% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 146 and fell by 5 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 138 and rose by 1 point over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is below its 50-day moving average but still above its 90-day and its long term trend line, with a RSI of 45. SPY ended the week *7.9% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is below its 50-day moving average, right at its 90-day but still above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 37. IWM ended the week *24.1% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 7.09%, one month ago: 6.81%, one year ago: 5.55%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
LATEST GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP) GROWTH ESTIMATE FOR THIS QUARTER ..
Q3: +5.9%
(Previous quarters .. Q2: +2.4% provisional .. Q1: +2.0% final)
This data comes from the Atlanta Fed which periodically issues its GDPNow model “now-cast”, which is a running algorithmic estimate of real seasonally-adjusted GDP growth for the current measured quarter based on multiple data points of recent economic releases. There are no subjective adjustments made to GDPNow—the estimate is based solely on the mathematical results of the model.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
AAII US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 32% (36% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 32% (34% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 36% (30% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 4 (Bullish by 6 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.375%) on September 20th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 89%, one month ago: 79%)
(one week ago: 11%, one month ago: 21%)
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.375%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 9%, one month ago: 5%)
(one week ago: 60%, one month ago: 59%)
(one week ago: 31%, one month ago: 36%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.61%) being paid currently for the 3-month duration and the lowest rate (4.25%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year rose from 0.66% to 0.78%, indicating a steepening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
What skills lead to the highest paying jobs in 2023?
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
BUY THE DIP
Buying the dips refers to going long an asset or security after its price has experienced a short-term decline, in repeated fashion.
Buying the dips can be profitable in long-term uptrends, but unprofitable or tougher during secular downtrends.
Dip buying can lower one's average cost of owning a position, but the risk and reward of dip-buying should be constantly evaluated.
"Buy the dips" is a common phrase investors and traders hear after an asset has declined in price in the short-term. After an asset's price drops from a higher level, some traders and investors view this as an advantageous time to buy or add to an existing position. The concept of buying dips is based on the theory of price waves. When an investor buys an asset after a drop, they are buying at a lower price, hoping to profit if the market rebounds.
Buying the dips has several contexts and different odds of working out profitably, depending on the situation. Some traders say they are "buying the dips" if an asset drops within an otherwise long-term uptrend. They hope the uptrend will resume after the drop.
Others use the phrase when no secular uptrend is present, but they believe an uptrend may occur in the future. Therefore, they are buying when the price drops in order to profit from some potential future price rise.
If an investor is already long and buys on the dips, they are said to be averaging down, an investing strategy that involves purchasing additional shares after the price has dropped further, resulting in a lower net average price. If, however, dip-buying does not later see an upturn, it is said to be adding to a loser.
Like all trading strategies, buying the dips does not guarantee profits. An asset can drop for many reasons, including changes to its underlying value. Just because the price is cheaper than before doesn't necessarily mean the asset represents good value.
The problem is that the average investor has very little ability to distinguish between a temporary drop in price and a warning signal that prices are about to go much lower. While there may be unrecognized intrinsic value, buying additional shares simply to lower an average cost of ownership may not be a good reason to increase the percentage of the investor's portfolio exposed to the price action of that one stock. Proponents of the technique view averaging down as a cost-effective approach to wealth accumulation; opponents view it as a recipe for disaster.
A stock that falls from $10 to $8 might be a good buying opportunity, and it might not be. There could be good reasons why the stock dropped, such as a change in earnings, dismal growth prospects, a change in management, poor economic conditions, loss of a contract, and so forth. It may continue to drop—all the way to $0 if the situation is bad enough.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
As I’ll show in a moment, earnings and economic data last week generally propped up the case for a soft landing for the US economy and should have been celebrated, but the stock market seemed jumpy and afraid of its own shadow - seizing on anything negative it could find.
There’s a downside to the current high level of economic strength. In something of a return to the old “good news is bad news” narrative of 2021 and 2022, solid evidence of stronger growth was viewed suspiciously as possibly fueling inflation, maybe prompting the Fed to raise interest rates higher or at least hold them high for longer. These concerns are severely pushing up market interest rates (Treasury yields). This is being reflected in more new recent highs in mortgage rates (see AVERAGE 30 YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE below).
Rising yields are also a problem for stocks, because investors will be tempted to rotate out of riskier equities and into less-risky bonds because the additional expected return in stocks maybe isn’t worth the extra volatility. Rising risk-free payouts in Treasury bonds are simply getting too rich and tempting for many to resist.
Are traders rethinking the one year + inversion of the yield curve? The benchmark 10-year Treasury note interest rate is moving substantially higher and at a faster rate than the 2 year, leading to a flattening of the curve (see US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE below). The 10 year closed the week at 4.26%, having earlier touched its highest level since that well known crypto shill Soulja Boy suggested that we all crank that in October, 2007.
When it comes to interest rates, it’s no longer how high that matters though, it’s how long for. The market is always looking for what’s next, for what’s over the horizon. With the Fed almost certainly done (or almost done) with rate hikes, what comes next is rate cuts and the question then becomes: when? Current consensus is that the first cut will either be at the March 2024 Fed meeting or, perhaps more likely, the May 2024 one.
The week began with a raft of negative China headlines, the Wall Street Journal even speculated that this may be “China’s Lehman moment” (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below). Real estate firm Country Garden suspended trading in select offshore bonds on Monday and Zhongzhi Enterprise Group, one of the country’s biggest private wealth managers, missed payments on multiple high-yield investment products, reminding investors of the Chinese property market volatility from a few years back and reinforcing that recession risks in China could be very real. Portfolios with heavy exposure to emerging markets are already being affected.
Data last week showed that the US consumer economy and housing market are doing just fine. Americans’ spending is still outpacing inflation. Retail sales soared by 0.7% in July, a bigger burst of spending activity than economists had anticipated. The strong spending came as consumers spent more at online retailers (+2%, helped by Amazon Prime Day), restaurants (+1.4%), sporting goods stores (+1.5%) and clothing shops (+1%).
US industrial production reversed a two-month decline with a 1.0% increase in July, per a Federal Reserve survey.
There's still a nationwide shortage of homes available for sale, keeping prices elevated, but builders are ramping up activity. July Housing Starts hit 983k, 9.5% up on a year ago. New-home construction and related activities can have multiplier effects throughout the economy.
The latest estimate from the Atlanta Fed GDPNow (which I will now be tracking weekly in this report, see LATEST GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP) GROWTH ESTIMATE FOR THIS QUARTER below) is that Q3 GDP growth in the US will be a mind-boggling 5.8%. For context, the growth for both Q1 and Q2 was well under half that.
Minutes released last week from the last Fed meeting which unanimously agreed to resume the campaign of interest rate hikes after a one-meeting break, suggested that there may be at least one more rate hike penciled in for the cycle. Most of the participants still saw a "significant" risk of continued above-target inflation, however at least two members appeared to voice an opinion that raising rates may not have been necessary. Bullish investors would have liked the objections to have been a little more robust.
Quarterly results and guidance from Target (TGT), Walmart (WMT), Home Depot (HD), Cisco (CSCO), Applied Materials (AMAT) were all well received, while those of Agilent (A) disappointed.
Are we seeing just a consolidation in a still-upward trending market or the start of a more significant pullback? As things stand, I’m still in the camp of calling it an appropriate consolidation and pause in an uptrend, caused by the sheer speed and relentlessness of the March-July rally.
The Three Pillars of that rally that I always talk about (1. No Landing / Soft Landing, 2. Disinflation, 3. Fed Done/Almost Done with Rate Hikes) are still in place and will likely prevent a really nasty decline from happening as long as they persist, but we need something new to push meaningfully forward and right now we just aren’t getting it.
Investors have had time on their hands to focus on things like the Chinese economy, the 10 year Treasury rate, dysfunction in Congress, inflation still being above target etc. During the rally, none of these relatively mild negatives would have been top of mind, but traders are now fixating on them because there are no big new positive catalysts. This is what is behind the difficult market conditions of the last two or three weeks.
So what are the catalysts that could lead to a resumption of the rally? ..
1. Treasury yields (market interest rates) declining modestly. We don’t want them to collapse, as that’d signal a hard landing. But a slow drift lower, especially in the 10 year, could help reverse that traffic moving from stocks to short term treasury bonds. This could come from either Fed Chair Jerome Powell confirming that the Fed is done with rate hikes, more in-line economic data and/or a continued decline in inflation readings.
2. Better than expected earnings. So far so good, earnings season has been generally positive. The biggest of them all, the Nvidia (NVDA) announcement this Wednesday, will be absolutely crucial. The company’s blow-out earnings ignited the summer rally and another strong report will help boost S&P 500 earnings expectations.
3. A Change in Sentiment. Negative sentiment was the unsung hero of the 2023 rally, as January’s strongly negative expectations never materialized, leaving money managers having to chase stocks higher. Now, it’s flipped, where higher stock prices are the consensus expectation. If the market continues to modestly pull back, then sentiment can become more negative and that can ironically be a springboard to the resumption of the rally.
4. Surprise good macro news. An improvement in the US/China relationship, large-scale Chinese economic stimulus, some kind of a ceasefire in the Russia/Ukraine war would all provide a surprise boost and reduce global recession chances and that would help lift stocks.
The bottom line is that the outlook for markets remains solid as long as those Three Pillars remain in place, but we need something new to kick start the rally back into gear because currently the market is just treading water and growing tired doing so. It will likely remain susceptible in the near term to any kind of unpleasant news, however modest.
OTHER NEWS ..
Just One Letter ..Single letter ticker symbols are the stock exchange’s equivalent of corporate vanity plates. They bestow a degree of Wall Street cred. AT&T has long had the ticker T, which is short for its original main product, the telephone. Citigroup (C), Ford (F), Macy’s (M), Kellogg (K) and Visa (V) are among the other one-letter firms. US Steel, the world’s first billion dollar capitalization company, has been the proud owner of the X ticker symbol for over a hundred years. Elon Musk is weirdly obsessed with that letter and probably has one jealous eye on it for if and when he ever decides to take the company formerly known as Twitter public again.
If US Steel is purchased by Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF), as is being rumored, it is possible that Cleveland-Cliffs would decide to switch its ticker symbol to the better-known X, rather than keep its rather lame existing one. But if US Steel is bought by Esmark or another private company or an overseas-listed company like ArcelorMittal, the X ticker symbol could become available.
According to the strict rules that govern the use of ticker symbols (yes, there are such things), if a company is taken over, it can hand over or release its ticker symbol or else hold on to it for a maximum of 24 months. There are still a handful of single-letter ticker symbols still available out there: I, N, P, Q and Y are all up for grabs.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 index SPXclosed on Friday at 4370,down over 2% for the week. The next upside resistance points are to be found at 4420, 4452 and 4464. Downside support levels are at 4332, 4320 and 4297.
Since the beginning of August, shorter term technical indicators have retreated from their prior overbought levels to what could soon be considered to be an oversold state. While the market works off these overbought conditions caused by the March-July rally, a rotation out of those heavily-weighted mega-cap technology names which have propelled the major price indexes higher so far in 2023, is likely to produce some headwinds to these indexes in the near term, not least because nearly 29% of the S&P 500 Index is comprised of the Technology sector.
We are also witnessing something of a loss of support from the small-cap segment. The most obvious problem is small-cap price underperformance relative to the rest of the market indicating that the small-cap engine is running out of fuel. The good news is that the longer-term indicators have not yet reversed course, which suggests that the current price slide is part of a digestion process following months of gains.
However, a key takeaway for investors during this shaky phase is that this rotation from growth into the previously-lagging more value-oriented sectors and industry groups could end up being a strong positive for markets in general as it has both simultaneously contributed to the major price indexes’ recent pause but also cushioned the decline.
The technical data emanating from the stock market still justifies a positive intermediate-term outlook, but with ample short term caution.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The majority of Q2 earnings season is over, but there are still some technology and retail names left to report this week, including the massively important report from Nvidia. Focus will also be on any news from the annual jamboree of monetary policy thinkers and practitioners in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
As well as Nvidia on Wednesday, earnings reports will come out from, among others, Lowe’s, Zoom Video, Intuit, Snowflake, Dollar Tree, Bath & Body Works, Advance Auto Parts, Nordstom and Ulta Beauty.
The 2023 Economic Policy Symposium will be in full swing from Thursday through Saturday in Jackson Hole. This year's topic will be "Structural Shifts in the Global Economy." Fed chair Jerome Powell is scheduled to address the conference on Friday.
Economic releases will include Existing Home Sales and New Home Sales data and the Durable Goods report.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) for the third week in a row - down 0.8% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 4.5% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 151 and fell by 10 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 137 and rose by 11 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It is now below its 50-day moving average but still above its 90-day and its long term trend line, with a RSI of 35. SPY ended the week *8.6% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It is now below its 50-day moving average but still above both its 90-day and its long term trend line, with a RSI of 35. IWM ended the week *23.9% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.96%, one month ago: 6.78%, one year ago: 5.13%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
LATEST GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP) GROWTH ESTIMATE FOR THIS QUARTER ..
Q3: +5.8%
(Previous .. Q2: +2.4% provisional .. Q1: +2.0% final)
This data comes from the Atlanta Fed which periodically issues its GDPNow model “now-cast”, which is a running algorithmic estimate of real seasonally-adjusted GDP growth for the current measured quarter based on multiple data points of recent economic releases. There are no subjective adjustments made to GDPNow—the estimate is based solely on the mathematical results of the model.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
AAII US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 36% (45% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 34% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 30% (25% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 6 (Bullish by 20 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are typically polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.375%) on September 20th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 90%, one month ago: 85%)
(one week ago: 10%, one month ago: 14%)
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.375%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 8%, one month ago: 13%)
(one week ago: 59%, one month ago: 62%)
(one week ago: 33%, one month ago: 25%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.55%) being paid currently for the 3-month duration and the lowest rate (4.26%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell from 0.73% to 0.66%, indicating a flattening in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Before your child goes to college, you should complete these six important documents
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
LEHMAN MOMENT
A “Lehman Moment” describes a point at which one company’s problems become everyone’s problems.
The term refers to the late 2008 bankruptcy of global investment bank Lehman Brothers, which many see as the turning point when the problems of U.S. investment banks became the world’s problems.
Following the bankruptcy, the U.S. government stepped in with a massive bailout package to rescue the entire financial sector, especially investment banks and insurance companies.
The contagion spread, and it became the 2008 global financial crisis.
In the early 2000s, banks and other financial institutions began offering mortgages to borrowers who historically would not have qualified, such as people with poor credit, people who could make only a small down payment, or those who applied for loans beyond their means to pay. These loans were referred to as subprime.
Banks were able lend to these people for two reasons:
Banks created new investment products into which they pooled the loans and then sold to investors, dramatically reducing their own risk by passing it on.
Housing prices were rising steadily, so even if borrowers could not keep up with mortgage payments, they could easily sell at a profit and pay off the mortgage or simply borrow more against the now-higher market value of the property.
When price rises began slowing, it became more difficult for borrowers to sell at a profit or to refinance. Mortgage losses began to rise.
By early 2007, leading subprime mortgage lender New Century Financial filed for bankruptcy. Shortly thereafter, large numbers of mortgage-backed securities were downgraded to high risk, and more subprime lenders closed.
As investors began to shun subprime mortgage products, lenders stopped writing mortgages for subprime borrowers, which cut demand for housing; this, in turn, caused house prices to fall further.
Borrowers suddenly could no longer simply sell or refinance, and when the value of their homes fell below what they owed in mortgage payments, many simply walked away.
By the summer of 2008, the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA, commonly known as Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (FHLMC, commonly known as Freddie Mac), both quasi-government lenders, had incurred losses so large that they needed to be bailed out by the federal government.
Lenders began making it even more difficult for homebuyers to borrow, which pushed down housing prices even further. With foreclosures climbing, even more homes were offered for sale, increasing supply in an already oversupplied market.
By early 2008, the problems began hitting the nation’s largest financial institutions. In March 2008, the Bear Stearns Cos. notified the Federal Reserve Bank that it would not have enough financing to meet its obligations. As one of the largest securities firms in the U.S., with assets of nearly $400 billion, Bear Stearns’ problems rattled the market.
The Fed offered financing to keep Bear Stearns afloat, and when that did not work, it brokered a deal for Bear Stearns to merge with JPMorgan Chase, committing some $29 billion to make the deal happen. The bailout meant Bear Stearns avoided default and bankruptcy.
Six months later, Lehman Brothers Holdings, at the time the fourth-largest investment bank in the U.S. by assets, filed for bankruptcy.
The S&P 500 fell some 5% on the day of the Lehman bankruptcy filing. Shortly thereafter, a major money market fund that held large amounts of Lehman debt announced that it would not be able to repay its investors all the money they had put in, causing a run on money market funds, which prompted the Fed to step in to guarantee money market fund assets.
Despite efforts to stabilize the market, less than 48 hours after Lehman filed for bankruptcy, the Fed was forced to bail out global insurer American International Group (AIG). The S&P 500 fell a further 5%.
Several weeks later, with the contagion spreading, Congress passed the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), which provided some $700 billion to stabilize the financial system.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The stock market playbook is being followed exactly as we would expect and in the way that I have been banging on about in my recent weekly reports. The plain fact is that, around 4500, the S&P 500 index is priced for near-term perfection with zero room for any kind of disappointments,meaning that even the most modest of negatives (an uptick in market interest rates, some lackluster earnings, a less impressive economic report) or simply news or data that isn’t constantly positive, can cause market choppiness and sometimes significant pullbacks - not because the news is that bad in an absolute sense, but instead because there’s just no margin for error at current levels.
The strong spring/early summer rally included a very healthy dose of “chasing” and increased money flows as under-exposed traders, investors and institutions scrambled to add stock exposure in response to very negative sentiment abruptly turning positive.
That dynamic has now been exhausted and if we get more “not positive” or “we-didn’t-see-that-coming” episodes over the next few weeks, then a continued decline in the S&P 500 back towards more fundamental support (between 4,300-4,400) actually makes sense and should not be a surprise.
Positively though, as long as the “Three Pillars” of the rally remain in place (1. No Landing / Soft Landing, 2. Disinflation, 3. Fed Done/Almost Done with Rate Hikes), then any such decline would probably not necessarily indicate that the rally was about to reverse - but could be viewed more as a temporary setback in a still positively-trending market.
The hard landing vs. soft landing question remains the most important one of all for markets over the medium- and longer-term for this simple reason; if there’s a soft landing then a further 10%-ish stock market rally is possible. If there’s a hard landing then it really doesn’t matter what the Fed does because any rate cuts will already be too late - and a market decline of 10% to 20%+ is likely.
Looking at the data as I do, the current conclusion hasn’t changed: a soft landing is still more likely than a hard landing. There are no real signs that US consumer spending is materially slowing and business spending appears to be healthy. That said, there has been a degree of additional deterioration on the employment front that we need to keep an eye on, but at this point it’s not enough to signal a shift to a hard landing narrative.
To reiterate, this does not mean a hard landing won’t happen. But so far, it isn’t happening. Growth is moderating at an acceptable pace but one that could be a cause for concern if the rate of economic contraction meaningfully accelerates.
Tesla (TSLA) shares tumbled on Monday after long-time CFO Zach Kirkhorn surprisingly quit. Declining COVID vaccine demand hit the stock prices of Moderna (MRNA) and BioNTech (BNTX).
Elsewhere there were notable upside surprises for Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B), Eli Lilly (LLY) and Wynn Resorts (WYNN) and notable disappointments for Palantir (PLTR), Beyond Meat (BYND) and Tyson Foods (TSN).
A bit of a Q2 earnings pattern is emerging. In general, earnings beats are being rewarded less than usual and earnings misses are being punished more than usual. The reason is that so many stocks have already gone up big in that spring/early summer rally based on anticipation and reality is beginning to butt into the picture. It’s classic “Buy The Rumor, Sell The News”. As more and more earnings are released, we move from the rumor phase to the news phase.
Credit agency Moody's Investors Service downgraded the credit ratings of ten small and midsize US banks on Monday and is actively considering the possibility of downgrading some larger lenders. Financial stocks across the board initially responded by plunging in price.
Moody's cited several factors for the review, including elevated funding expenses, potential regulatory vulnerabilities and the ever-growing risks associated with commercial real estate loans due to continued diminishing demand for office space. The optimists’ view is that the Moody's call drives home the point that credit conditions are tight enough, which could well help deter the Fed from further interest rate hikes, which will ultimately benefit stock prices.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation came out on Thursday. On an annual basis, consumer prices rose 3.2% in July, slightly up from the previous month's 3.0% gain. Gas prices have been climbing in recent weeks, which could pull the headline rate higher in the August data.
The closely-watched Core CPI inflation figure, which excludes more volatile food and energy costs, was up 4.7% year-on-year, down a touch from June but still over double the Fed’s target. Once again, the biggest contributor to the gains was shelter costs.
CPI’s wholesale cousin, the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers rose 0.3% in July, a bit higher than expected and the largest gain since January.
Core PPI, which excludes food/energy prices and trade services rose 2.7% from a year earlier, well down from the previous month’s rate of 5.8%.
The inflation reports didn't really move the needle much at all, so stocks ultimately finished flat over the second half of the week. Until we get a number as near as dammit to the Fed's 2% target, however, inflation and its associated effect on the economy and the Fed’s propensity to play around with interest rates and thereby impact the stock market, will not go away.
OTHER NEWS ..
Taking Credit .. Total US consumer credit card balances (SEE EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK) increased by $45 billion last quarter, the most of all debt types, to surpass $1 trillion (that’s $1,000,000,000,000) for the first time ever. Delinquency rates are also on the rise and have now returned to pre-COVID stimulus levels.
We Thought We’d Seen The Last Of This .. More trouble is brewing in Congress as a small number of extremist Republicans are once again plotting to try and cause a government shutdown in advance of federal funding running out on September 30th. A few investment analysts are even putting this brinkmanship into their late-2023 outlooks with some forecasting probabilities as high as a 40% chance of a government shutdown by October and 60% by December.
While this does not risk causing a debt default like the standoff caused when the same individuals pulled this stunt earlier this year, it could still be economically damaging to the rest of us. Members of Congress opted to head off for their August vacations without being anywhere near resolving this issue, so will be under the gun again when they get back. Cue more tiresome b**t grandstanding from all sides.
Still Waiting .. The long-awaited economic recovery in China is still not materializing. July exports fell by the most since February 2020, while imports also slid by more than economists had expected. The weakness in imports undermines the hope that domestic demand will lead the bounce for China’s economy, which is taking a hit from a slump in the real estate market and softening consumption growth. The latest inflation data showed China’s consumer and producer prices moving lower for the first time since 2020. Such deflation would likely further slow an already struggling economy.
Back You Go! .. A New York judge has revoked the bail of former crypto billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried and sent him to jail at a particularly nasty federal detention facility in Brooklyn, NY after finding that “on at least two occasions” he attempted to intimidate key government witnesses in the case against him, including his on-again/off-again girlfriend and made illegal contact with some of his media buddies - all while on bail at his mom and dad’s beautiful, historic one-acre home with a pool in Palo Alto, CA.
SBF’s trial on multiple criminal counts, which could well result in decades of jail time for the disgraced founder of the crypto exchange FTX and previously a darling of politicians and entertainment and sporting celebs, is scheduled to begin on October 2nd. FTX collapsed last year following exposure of astonishingly widespread fraud, theft, negligence and mismanagement, resulting in billions of dollars of losses for investors.
UNDER THE HOOD - THE TECHNICALS ..
The S&P 500 index SPXclosed on Friday at 4464,down a little on the week. The next upside resistance points are to be found at 4475, 4490 and 4560. Downside support levels are at 4438, 4415 and 4402.
Volatility and volume have both remained low and breadth measures have remained high during this recent market retreat and the Lowry’s Demand/Supply balance (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below) is not really shifting much at all. These conditions are actually more in keeping with a healthy pullback in relief of previously-overbought conditions rather than a technically damaging one.
Shorter term technical indicators may be deteriorating somewhat, but the bigger picture longer term ones are still holding up well. There is, however, a clear trajectory of support moving away from the higher momentum, larger cap, mostly tech darlings of the first half of 2023 to the more value-oriented, smaller cap, steadier profitability former laggards.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The financial calendar cools down a bit this week, but a wave of retail earnings reports and a bit of economic data will still keep investors busy.
Home Depot, Walmart, Target, TJX, Ross Stores, Cisco Systems, Applied Materials, Deere, Estee Lauder, Agilent and Cardinal Health all report this week.
We’ll see Retail Sales data for July this week. The estimate is for a rise of 0.4% month-over-month. Also out this week is the latest Housing Market Index for August.
On Wednesday, the Fed will release the minutes from its late-July monetary-policy meeting, when the headline interest rate was raised by a quarter of a percent.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) for the second week in a row - up 3.3% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Microsoft, Apple) - down 2.87% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 161 and fell by 3 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 126 and rose by 3 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 46. SPY ended the week *6.7% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 46. IWM ended the week *21.3% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.90%, one month ago: 6.96%, one year ago: 5.25%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
AAII US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 45% (49% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 30% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 25% (21% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 20 (Bullish by 28 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.375%) on September 20th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 87%, one month ago: 82%)
(one week ago: 13%, one month ago: 13%)
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.375%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 9%, one month ago: 11%)
(one week ago: 67%, one month ago: 52%)
(one week ago: 24%, one month ago: 37%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.54%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (4.16%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year remained unchanged at 0.73%, indicating no change in the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Before you argue that expense tracking or goal setting or “manifesting” your future wealth are more important than income, remember to bring data. I’ll have mine.” Nick Magiulli on why your income can be pretty much everything.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
CREDIT CARD DEBT
While useful for making purchases over time, credit card debt does carry some of the industry’s highest interest rates.
Credit card debt typically accounts for a significant portion of credit utilization on a borrower’s credit profile.
Paying down substantial portions of outstanding credit card debt is one of the best ways to rapidly improve your credit score.
Generally, credit card debt refers to the accumulated outstanding balances that many borrowers carry over from month to month. Credit card debt can be useful for borrowers seeking to make purchases with deferred payments over time. This type of debt does carry some of the industry’s highest interest rates. However, credit card borrowers do have the option to pay off their balances each month to save on interest over the long term.
Credit cards are one of the most popular forms of revolving credit and offer numerous benefits for borrowers. Credit cards are issued with revolving credit limits that borrowers can utilize as needed. Payments are typically much lower than a standard non-revolving loan. Users also have the option to pay off balances to avoid high-interest costs. Additionally, most credit cards come with reward incentives such as cash back or points that can be used toward future purchases or even to pay down outstanding balances.
Lenders report credit card debt level balances to credit bureaus each month along with a borrower’s relevant credit activity. Thus, credit cards can be an excellent way for borrowers to build out a favorable credit profile over time. However, negative activity such as delinquent payments, high balances, and a high number of hard inquiries in a short period of time can also lead to problems for credit card borrowers.
Credit card debt is highly influential in determining a borrower’s credit score since it will typically account for a significant portion of credit utilization on a borrower’s credit profile. Credit bureaus track each individual credit account by itemized trade lines on a credit report. The aggregation of outstanding credit card debt from these trade lines is the borrower’s total credit card debt, which is used by credit bureaus to calculate their credit utilization ratio by dividing it by the aggregate amount of credit limits of all credit cards owned by the borrower. Credit card utilization is an essential component of a borrower’s credit score.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Bank of America became the latest to hop aboard the now-rather crowded Happy Train early last week, eagerly joining Team No Recession. The abrupt change of stance comes just a week after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told reporters that the central bank’s own economists are no longer forecasting a recession. As BofA economists put it in a note to clients on Wednesday;“Recent incoming data has made us reassess our prior view that a mild recession in 2024 is the most likely outcome for the US economy,”
The no-recession narrative appeared to have been endorsed by the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS), whichis reverting to its pre-COVID trend path, showing the number of people hired in June was down by 326k from May. We can now safely say that, since late 2021, hiring has gone from insanely hot to pleasantly warm.
The same trend is evident in the rate at which workers voluntarily quit their jobs. The peak point of people leaving their jobs was around the same time, in November 2021, when the quit rate hit 3.0%, an all-time high. In June 2023, it fell to 2.4%, close to the 2019 average of about 2.3% The Great Resignation has finally given way to The Normal, Healthy Job Market Resignation.
The Bank of England (BOE) copied their big brothers’ homework, following the Fed and the European Central Bank (ECB) and raising interest rates by a quarter of a percent last week and refusing to rule out further hikes.
It was an insanely busy week of earnings reports and it ended up mixed with a negative tilt. There was better than expected news from some (Amazon (AMZN), Caterpillar (CAT), CVS Pharmacy (CVS), Amgen (AMGN), Match (MTCH) and Walgreens (WBA)) and disappointment from others (Apple (AAPL), Pfizer (PFE), Merck (MRK), Paypal (PYPL), Qualcomm (QCOM), Uber (UBER) despite booking its first-ever profitable quarter, Airnb (ABNB) and Etsy (ETSY)).
After a couple of days of churning sideways, markets opened on Wednesday ready to react to the US ratings downgrade (see OTHER NEWS below), spiking market interest rates and the circus of the latest Trump indictment. More importantly, stocks have been in an overbought condition with the S&P 500 above 4500 and just a few percentage points away from a new all-time high and the stage was set for some kind of short-term reversal.
So it wasn’t really a surprise when prices fell quite hard on Wednesday, especially for the FAAMGs and the YUCs as investors appeared to be booking profits on some of their best-performing recent purchases, spurred on by the Fitch news and some mostly disappointing earnings reports that day. Remarkably, this was the first 1%+ fall in the S&P 500 index in a single day since May 23rd.
This skittishness was emphasized by a further dive in stocks late in the day following a nonsense rumor of an active shooter in the Senate building. This is typical of the behavior of a market actively looking for reasons to pull back and take a breather.
After a flat-to-lower Thursday, Friday saw the latest Jobs Report come out pre-market and it had a little bit for everyone — fewer jobs created than expected (187k vs 200k expected), but unemployment a bit lower (3.5% vs 3.6% expected) and wages picked up at a little higher pace than forecast (4.4% up on a year ago). None of this likely moved the dial enough to change anyone's overall market view but, after an initial bounce, the profit-taking resumed and the stock market closed lower again for a third consecutive day of losses and rounding off its worst week since early March.
I wanted to address a misconception that seems to be floating around out there, with the latest inflation figures due out this week (see THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR below) .. it’s important not to confuse disinflation with the idea that the price increases of the past several years will reverse, because they won’t. The longer people have to pay these prices, the more it chips away at excess savings and excess spending, potentially resulting in a spending slowdown in the not-too-distant future which could ultimately damage stock returns. It will be a slow burn though, indeed almost imperceptible.
Disinflation is definitely a positive, but it’s important not to confuse the decline in inflation with the idea that prices are about to drop and give us all some relief. They are not and the best we can hope for is that they simply stop going up as much as they have done.
OTHER NEWS ..
Higher Interest For Your Cash .. Last week saw at least two of the major high yield savings platforms raise their rates for depositors even higher, so I updated my recent articleabout them, which you can read here, to reflect the new rates and FDIC/SIPC insurance coverages.
Marked Down .. The US was stripped last week of its top-tier sovereign credit rating by Fitch Ratings (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below), echoing a move last made more than a decade ago by Standard & Poors. The credit assessor downgraded the US down from it’s highest AAA grade to AA+.
The move was clearly a dressing down for US politics as it comes in the wake of major congressional battles over the nation’s borrowing and repeated politically-driven standoffs over raising the debt limit. While the most recent legislative impasse was quite swiftly resolved, it remains a potential issue of concern going forward particularly in an era when shameless political stunts in Congress in support of extremist political agendas are becoming the norm and have eroded confidence in the US government’s ability to show adequate fiscal management.
Only nine countries now hold the highest credit rating at all three major agencies (S&P Global Ratings, Fitch and Moody’s Investors Service); Germany, Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Singapore and Australia. Canada (and now the US) is rated AAA by two out the three.
Fixed Rates Make Life Tricky For The Fed .. Only 11% of US household debt has an adjustable interest rate. That means that the many millions of Americans locked into existing fixed rate mortgages/auto loans/student loans have quite simply not been impacted by the Fed’s year plus campaign of rate hikes. And millions more have paid off these debts already or never had them and are also left unaffected.
This is what can make the Fed’s job difficult as raising interest rates is a blunt tool and drawing a straight line between interest rates, consumer spending and the rate of inflation is not always easy.
Who does it really hit when interest rates rise? Those with adjustable-rate debt like credit cards. The average interest rate on credit card debt continues to rise, recently hitting a record high of 20.7%. Also hurt are those in the market for a new asset purchase that is not accompanied by a sale that often requires financing, like first-time buyers of homes and cars.
Prices and borrowing costs of these assets have rocketed in tandem. The median price of a “starter home” in the US is 46% higher than 2019 levels. The monthly mortgage payment needed to purchase one of these homes has more than doubled over that time.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
On the charts, the S&P 500 index SPX (which closed on Friday at 4478) failed again at the strong resistance level at 4585 and then promptly fell hard. The next upside resistance is at 4536, 4555, 4585 and 4605. All downside support levels were broken last week - the next ones are at 4468, 4451 and 4385.
The Percent of Stocks Within 2% of Their One Year Highs has been expanding nicely recently but slipped a little a couple of weeks ago, providing evidence of investors beginning to take profits in their winners, while rotating into those that remain much further off their highs. We can see this with the Percent of Stocks 20% or More Below Their One Year Highs falling fast to a new 52-week low of below 29% at the end of July.
All this paints a picture of investors are taking profits in their Large Cap winners and rotating into more attractively-priced value-oriented sectors and Small Caps. Although the short term effect can be a hit to the major indexes - as we saw last week, this is also part of the healthy rotation now underway as prior leaders, including the growth sectors, take a breather. Other economically sensitive areas are now bubbling up to the top of the list in terms of Demand growth and participation.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Earnings season keeps on rolling this week. We’ll also get key inflation readings that will help inform the Fed’s next interest rate decision in September.
Disney, Alibaba, Eli Lilly, UPS, News Corp, Ralph Lauren, BioNTech, Paramount Global, Wynn Resorts, Palantir Technologies, Illumina, Take Two Interactive, Barrick Gold and Brookfield are among the earnings highlights.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for July comes out on Thursday. The estimate is for a 3.3% year over year increase and the closely-watched core number to increase by 4.8%. This will be followed on Friday by the latest Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 0.6% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 4.6% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 164 and fell by 9 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 123 and rose by 12 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 48. SPY ended the week *6.5% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 55. IWM ended the week *20.0% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.81%, one month ago: 6.71%, one year ago: 4.99%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 49% (45% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 30% (31% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 21% (24% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 28 (Bullish by 21 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.375%) on September 20th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 80%, one month ago: 74%)
(one week ago: 20%, one month ago: 18%)
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.375%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 9%, one month ago: 15%)
(one week ago: 62%, one month ago: 52%)
(one week ago: 29%, one month ago: 33%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.54%) being paid currently for the 3-month duration and the lowest rate (4.05%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell to 0.73% from 0.90%, indicating a flattening of the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Using margin to buy stocks is just not a good idea.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
FITCH RATINGS
Fitch ratings is a credit rating agency that rates the viability of investments relative to the likelihood of default.
Fitch is one of the top three credit rating agencies internationally, along with Moody's and Standard & Poor's.
Fitch uses a letter system; for example, a company rated AAA is very high quality with reliable cash flows, while a company rated D has already defaulted.
Fitch Ratings is an international credit rating agency based out of New York City and London. Investors use the company's ratings as a guide as to which investments will not default and subsequently yield a solid return. Fitch bases the ratings on factors, such as what kind of debt a company holds and how sensitive it is to systemic changes like interest rates.
Along with Moody's and Standard & Poor's (S&P’s), Fitch is one of the top three credit rating agencies in the world. The Fitch rating system is very similar to that of S&P in that they both use a letter system.
The Fitch rating system is as follows:
Investment grade
AAA: companies of exceptionally high quality (established, with consistent cash flows)
AA: still high quality; still has a low default risk.
A: low default risk; slightly more vulnerable to business or economic factors
BBB: a low expectation of default; business or economic factors could adversely affect the company
Non-investment grade
BB: elevated vulnerability to default risk, more susceptible to adverse shifts in business or economic conditions; still financially flexible
B: degrading financial situation; highly speculative
CCC: a real possibility of default
CC: default is a strong probability
C: default or default-like process has begun
RD: issuer has defaulted on a payment
D: defaulted
Fitch offers sovereign credit ratings that describe each nation’s ability to meet its debt obligations. Sovereign credit ratings are available to investors to help give them insight into the level of risk associated with investing in a particular country. Countries will invite Fitch and other credit rating agencies to evaluate their economic and political environments and financial situations to determine a representative rating. It’s very important to obtain the best sovereign credit rating possible, particularly in the case of developing nations, as it aids in accessing funding in international bond markets.
In 2018 Fitch awarded the United States with the highest AAA sovereign credit rating before moving in down to AA+ last week. On the lower end was Brazil with a BB-.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
To the surprise of precisely nobody, the Federal Reserve resumed its campaign of interest rate increases on Wednesday, pushing its target Fed Funds rate up another quarter of a percentage point to a range of 5.25%-5.50%, the highest level since J-Lo joined forces with Ja Rule to point out to us that she was real back in 2001. It marked the eleventh increase since March 2022, at which time the rate was near zero.
There were only the slightest of tweaks to the wording of the committee's eagerly-awaited June policy statement and no hint that the Fed might react to the improved and improving inflation data of recent weeks by pausing its hikes. This left the door wide open to more interest rate increases, but the central bank fell short of saying that it was definitely going to walk through it. The market probability of a hike at the next meeting in September is now 20% (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below).
In his press conference, Fed chair Jerome Powell, who stated that he didn’t believe inflation would return to the Fed’s 2% target (see ARTICLE OF THE WEEK below) until 2025, gave no guidance at all regarding the next meeting and no clue whatsoever as to what the Fed's parameters are for deciding to either hike further, suspend the rate hike campaign or eventually cut rates.
It felt like an infuriating exercise in saying nothing that left investors none-the-wiser about future Fed intentions. And we all know what happens when there is an information vacuum like this; the market will just fill it with its own thoughts and ideas.
Initially, investors seemed paralyzed with indecision by the lack of information. The S&P 500 Large Cap and Russell 2000 Small Cap indexes finished the day almost completely unchanged with the NASDAQ slightly lower.
Incidentally, readers may have noticed that, unlike most non-financial news outlets, I seldom reference the popular Dow Jones Industrial Average in this report. That’s because it’s a ridiculous, stupid index. So I won’t bother mentioning that it notched a 13th consecutive daily gain on Wednesday, a feat not achieved since 1987, before the streak finally came to an end on Thursday.
As the week continued, markets began to fill that information vacuum, deciding that they had learned absolutely nothing new and therefore we’re right back to where we were on Tuesday with the same expectations and risks and an unchanged timeline for a pause and eventual rate cuts that has helped drive stocks higher in 2023.
Thursday saw a stock market pullback, but as long as the “Three Pillars” of this rally remain in place: solid economic data (hope for a soft/no landing), disinflation and a near-term end to Fed rate hikes, these kind of retreats will probably be short-lived and pretty shallow and so it proved on Friday when stock prices resumed their upward march in earnest.
The European Central Bank (ECB) mimicked the Fed on Thursday, raising for the ninth straight meeting by a quarter point to 3.75% and itself leaving the door open to additional future hikes. ECB Chief Christine Lagarde was certainly more forthcoming than her Fed counterpart; “What I can assure you of is, we are not going to cut,” she said. “We want to break the back of inflation.” The Bank of Japan (BOJ) surprised markets with its own version of a rate hike on Friday, which is essentially loosening its rigid control of the country’s interest rate ceiling.
US economic data continued to spectacularly impress last week and it’s clear that we are currently a million miles away from a recession. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, used by the Fed to measure inflation, confirmed the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) data by falling to 3.0% annualized, down from 3.8% the previous month and the lowest since March 2021.
There was plenty more besides. Q2 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) obliterated expectations, increasing at an eye-popping annual rate of 2.4%, according to the official second estimate (of three). Durable goods far outpaced projections. Pending Home Sales jumped for the first time in four months. Weekly Jobless Claims moved lower. The quarterly Employment Cost Index, a broad measure of wages and benefits, increased 1.0% in Q2, its slowest advance since 2021. Consumer Confidence (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) rose to a two-year high.
Truckloads of Q2 earnings were released last week as well and despite some disappointments (Microsoft, Exxon-Mobil, Snap Inc, T-Mobile, eBay, Juniper, Chipotle, Bristol Myers), the broad narrative was net positive (Meta/Facebook, Alphabet/Google, Proctor & Gamble, Boeing, Verizon, Intel, GE, Comcast, Ford, 3M, Roku, Royal Caribbean). The expected 8% overall decline in US corporate earnings coming into this results season is looking more and more off-base by the day.
Markets have now embraced the idea that there will be no damaging economic slowdown just as aggressively as they believed at the start of the year that there would be an unavoidable nasty downturn. And, in the same way as those predictions proved to be too grim, the current view likely understates the risks over the coming quarters. The stock market is pricing in no more Fed rate hikes and interest rate cuts beginning in the first half of 2024. Disappointment on either count is where some of the biggest risks lie.
OTHER NEWS ..
What Can We Believe Any More? .. In its lawsuit against the crypto exchange and Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleged last week that a firm he controlled massively inflated trading volumes on the exchange. Internal messages from Zhao appear to confirm this. Such “wash trading” accounted for more than 70% of trading volume on worldwide crypto exchanges, according to a study based on analysis of data from the second half of 2019. Zhao denies the charges. This obviously throws into even further doubt how much reliance can be placed on any data coming out of crypto-world and pushed into the public domain by its major participants.
That’s Not My Info! .. Two out of three credit complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are because the consumer’s credit report contains information that belongs to someone else. The US consumer credit watchdog received 197,709 credit report complaints between September 2021 and August 2022. Of those complaints, 66% are because information in the report was not that of the subject of the report, but of someone else.
While misattributing information from one individual to another's account was the top complaint, improper use of credit reports was another common issue, as were concerns about unresolved investigations into existing issues, according to a report from Fair Credit, a law firm that specializes in correcting errors in credit reports.
Some Random Stats From Charlie Biello Of Creative Planning ..
The US population is now 19% higher than where it was in January 2000 while the inventory of Existing Homes for sale in the US is 37% lower
The number of car thefts in major US cities in the first six months of 2023 rose by over 104% over the same period in 2019. Kia and Hyundai thefts surged after a popular TikTok challenge using the hashtag #KiaBoys with more than 75 million views on the platform, provided viewers with handy tips on how to steal the cars.
Extra-virgin olive oil prices have increased 87% over the past year to a record high due to a severe shortage
Between surveys conducted from 2005 to 2006 and surveys conducted from 2017 to 2020, consumption of bottled water in the US rose 56% while the amount of regular cows’ milk consumed fell by almost 50%
UNDER THE HOOD ..
On the charts, the S&P 500 index SPX (which closed on Friday at 4582) is bumping up against a strong upside resistance level of 4585. Next stops are up at 4596 and 4610. Some downside support has developed at 4558 and particularly at 4529, then again further down at 4492.
It may appear that markets are in conflict right now with stocks apparently grinding their way into a new bull market while bonds continue to scream warnings of a looming recession. It should be noted that the tale of the tape is in favor of bond markets on the previous occasions that the two have gone head-to-head.
As I have pointed out before, it is more a withdrawal of Supply that appears primarily responsible for the recent stock market gains rather than the preferable healthy expansion of high-conviction Demand and this scenario is not typically indicative of the investor enthusiasm that usually accompanies lasting advances.
Having said that, there is no doubt that the body of evidence across the stock market is much improved. The parts that still need technical work are found in Small Caps and given the sheer number of stocks there, this is still the segment that requires the most monitoring.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week will be the busiest one of the Q2 earnings season, with a third of S&P 500 companies scheduled to report. The economic data highlights will be employment-related.
Apple, Amazon, Pfizer, CVS, Paypal, Starbucks, Qualcomm Caterpillar, Advanced Micro Devices, Alibaba, Uber, Simon Property, Shopify, Marriot, CBOE Markets and Dominion Energy are among the big boys on the docket this week.
The US Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) on Tuesday. The forecast is for a slight decline in job openings from the prior month.
Then on Friday it’s Jobs Day. Expectations are for a gain of 200k payrolls in July, following a rise of 209k in June. The unemployment rate is expected to remain at a historically low 3.6%.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 4.8% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower Corp) - down 2.8% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 173 and rose by 11 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 111 and fell by 9 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 69. SPY ended the week *4.4% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 63. IWM ended the week *19.0% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.78%, one month ago: 6.71%, one year ago: 5.30%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 45% (51% a week ago)
⬌ Neutral: 31% (27% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 24% (22% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 21 (Bullish by 29 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.375%) on September 20th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 84%, one month ago: 69%)
(one week ago: 16%, one month ago: 16%)
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.375%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 9%, one month ago: 24%)
(one week ago: 64%, one month ago: 52%)
(one week ago: 27%, one month ago: 24%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.58%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (4.01%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year fell to 0.90% from 0.98%, indicating a flattening of the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“There is no empirical evidence showing 2% is the optimal long-run inflation target”. Hey, Fed! What’s so damn special about 2%?asks Barry Ritholtz.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
CONSUMER CONFIDENCE INDEX (CCI)
The Consumer Confidence Index survey measures consumer attitudes and confidence regarding their financial prospects.
The index is issued by the Conference Board and is based on the Consumer Confidence Survey.
The CCI provides insight into U.S. economic conditions, including whether consumers might make major purchases, such as homes and automobiles.
The CCI measures and compares how consumers view the overall economy, business conditions, and labor market presently and over the next six months.
The CCI infers that when consumers are optimistic, they spend more, stimulating the economy, but when pessimistic, spending declines.
The Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) is a survey, administered by The Conference Board, that measures how optimistic or pessimistic consumers are regarding their expected financial situation. The CCI is based on the premise that if consumers are optimistic, they will spend more and stimulate the economy but if they are pessimistic then their spending patterns could lead to an economic slowdown or recession.
The CCI is released on the last Tuesday of every month, and it is widely regarded as the most credible gauge of U.S. consumer confidence. Essentially, it is a barometer of the health of the U.S. economy and is based on consumers' perceptions of current business and employment conditions, and their expectations for the business, employment, and income for the next six months. CCI is conducted by Nielsen, a global provider of information and analytics on consumers' buying and watching habits.
The Consumer Confidence Index is based on the Consumer Confidence Survey, which has a responding sample size of 3,000 questionnaires. The survey was initially conducted every two months starting in 1967 but changed to monthly tracking in 1977.
There are five questions asked—two related to present economic conditions and three related to future expectations.
The Present Situation Index asks:
Respondents’ appraisal of current business conditions
Respondents’ appraisal of current employment conditions
The Expectations Index asks:
Respondents' expectations regarding business conditions six months hence
Respondents' expectations regarding employment conditions six months hence
Respondents' expectations regarding their total family income six months hence
Each response can be answered with one of three responses: positive, negative, or neutral.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Less than twenty months after it began, the bear market that engulfed the S&P 500 in early 2022 is now just 260 points away from being completely erased.
2023 has barely passed its midpoint and the market has already blown through even the most optimistic estimates for where Wall Street thought the S&P 500 might be by year end. In the process, it has constantly defied all the early-year gloom accompanied by talk of a guaranteed recession, soaring inflation and an aggressive Federal Reserve interest rate policy.
However, while it’s undeniable that the fears of a hard landing, inflation and catastrophic consequences from a hawkish Fed have not materialized, the reality is that *the current level of the S&P 500 now largely factors all of that in, so recent solid inflation, retail sales and jobs data have really only reinforced what was already widely assumed to be the case.
All this good data did create further “chasing” from FOMO-infected under-invested professional investors and fund managers needing to play catch up which pushed stock prices up further, but with sentiment so overwhelmingly positive and the financial media and many economists now pretty much dismissing any chances of a recession, most of the chasing that’s going to take place has likely already happened.
Case in point, Goldman Sachs analysts last week reduced their perception of the probability of a recession of any kind in the US to just 20% and JP Morgan essentially took the same position.
We’ve basically had the best outcome anyone could have dreamed of at the start of the year and while that means that the gains in stocks are absolutely legitimate, it also means that there’s a strong risk of exhaustion in the near term.
Bottom line, the macroeconomic picture is currently as positive as anyone can possibly hope for, but don’t confuse that with a low-risk environment. The S&P 500 is highly vulnerable to even the slightest of disappointments, particularly in the area of company earnings.
Last week’s earnings results were a mixed bag. Goldman Sachs' 2Q earnings came in weaker than expected, and Netflix's revenue fell short of forecasts, despite showing a surprisingly strong jump in subscribers on the back of its password-sharing ban. United Airlines and Tesla bothbeat earnings estimates, but with vastly different outcomes for the stocks, nicely up and badly down, respectively. .
The still-deeply (and continually deepening) inverted yield curve (see US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE below)remains the elephant in the room as the US economy has fallen into a recession 100% of the time when this happens, looking back at over seven decades of data. The question facing investors now becomes; is it actually different this time, or are we watching one of the largest “bull traps” (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) in history develop in real time?
There’s no suspense surrounding the Fed’s upcoming interest rate call on Wednesday (traders see the chance of a quarter point hike at 99.3%). The only real intrigue lies more in whether we will see two consecutive quarter-point hikes across the July and September meetings. That probability fell last week and is currently being priced at around 16%.
There’s no doubt that the previously narrow path to to a soft landing is widening all the time* and that is keeping the stock market buoyant. This is demonstrated by the fact that the rally is continuing to broaden from just being driven by big dog tech, with the Russell 2000 Small Cap index, the S&P 600 Mid Cap index and even your grandad’s favorite olden-timey Dow Jones Industrial Average index once again outperforming 2023’s two shining stars, the NASDAQ and the S&P 500, last week.
As I outline in THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR below, we are going to learn a lot this coming week. That could possibly include some earnings letdowns, surprisingly hawkish words from Jerome Powell at his press conference on Wednesday and a nasty surprise in the inflation data on Friday. Any of these things (or worse, a combination of more than one of them) could qualify as a “disappointment” which - as I mentioned earlier - could undo a decent amount of the recent gains.
But the glass-is-half-full view of things is that all of these could further extend the trajectory of the current positive narrative and push us closer to the eventual obliteration of what history may eventually refer to as the post-pandemic bear market of the early 2020s.
* Later this week, I will be sending out a post in which I explain in more detail some of the stock market and economic terminology that is being bandied about everywhere right now, including the concepts of “hard” and “soft” landings.
OTHER NEWS ..
US Finally Catching Up .. The US Federal Reserve last week launched"FedNow", a long-anticipated service aimed at finally modernizing this country's antiquated and cumbersome money transfer system. This service will eventually enable ordinary Americans to send and receive funds (including pay checks) in seconds and 24/7, eliminating the delays and high expenses commonly associated with cash transfers.
The move will bring the US in line with many other countries like the European Union, the UK, India and Brazil, which have had similar services for many years. FedNow has been in development since 2019 and is expected to significantly improve the efficiency and accessibility of the payment system in the US. A properly-functioning electronic payment system in the US might lessen the perceived need for a central bank digital currency.
US Dollar Blues ..The currency is teetering at the lowest level in more than a year after signs of cooling inflation and other data bolstered bets that the Federal Reserve will soon stop hiking interest rates. Many strategists and investors saying a turning point is finally at hand for the dollar. If they’re right, there could be far-reaching consequences for global economies and financial markets. A long-term dollar slide would reduce import prices for developing nations, helping them to ease their inflation pressures. It would also help to bolster currencies like the yen, which has been tumbling for months. More broadly, a softer US currency would tend to boost American firms’ exports at the expense of their counterparts in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.
What it will absolutely NOT do, contrary to ridiculous online and social media conspiracy nonsense that has been spiking recently, is to spell the end of the US Dollar as the world’s reserve currency.
Euro-Problems .. An aging population with a preference for recreation, leisure and job security over earnings and personal financial sustainability has created years of lackluster economic and productivity growth to European Union (EU) countries. The eurozone economy grew about 6% over the past 15 years, measured in dollars, compared with 82% for the US, according to data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
That has left the average EU country poorer per head than every US state except Idaho and Mississippi, according to a report this month by the European Centre for International Political Economy. European governments are now finding the old recipes for fixing the problem of economic growth and populations financially unprepared for retirement are either becoming unaffordable or have simply stopped working and most of them appear to have no Plan B.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
On the charts, the S&P 500 index (which closed on Friday at 4536), breached a very important upside resistance level of 4529 last week. Next up are 4559 and 4602. Downside support can be found at 4490 and 4439 and then not much after that till 4350 and 4309.
Smaller Cap stocks still hold the key to any technical-analysis-endorsed market turnaround from bear to bull.
The Percent of Small-Cap Stocks 20% or More Below One Year Highs remains elevated at nearly 43% indicating many smaller stocks are still in bear markets. The outlier status of the Small Cap segment is illustrated by the fact that Large and Mid Caps have readings of 15% and 18%, respectively. Moving forward, a sustainable drop in this reading below the previous February 2nd low of 39% would provide evidence of investors taking on more risk.
On the opposite side of the spectrum, the Percent of Small-Cap Stocks Within 2% of One Year Highs is still disappointingly low at around 14% - but is showing signs of heading in the right direction.
The balance of Supply and Demand is definitely on more favorable footing these days, although this is being accomplished more through a decline in Supply than an explosion of Demand, leading to the slight suspicion that there is still something a bit “off” about the current market.
Bottom line: while a significant further broadening of participation of smaller stocks is still needed to improve the overall health of the broad market, there are growing signs that some of the technical divergences between the market’s real health and just the part of the iceberg that shows above the surface are narrowing. The under-the-hood data is slowly changing for the better.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Strap in. It’s Fed-week again, with an interest rate decision due on Wednesday as well as dozens of Q2 earnings reports scattered throughout the week and the release of a big inflation number. There will also be data on consumer confidence and a new Q2 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) estimate.
The Federal Open Market Committee will convene on Tuesday and Wednesday, with a monetary-policy/interest rate decision and a press conference with Fed chair Jerome Powell due on Wednesday afternoon. Futures markets are pricing in overwhelming odds of another quarter point increase in the federal funds interest rate, to the 5.25%-5.50% range.
More than 150 S&P 500 companies are scheduled to report this week, including Microsoft, Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook, Exxon-Mobil, Chevron, Procter & Gamble, Intel, General Motors, Ford Motors, Visa, General Electric, Verizon, T-Mobile US, eBay, Southwest Airlines, Chipotle, Comcast, American Tower, Waste Management and Dominos Pizza.
Economic data out this week will include the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (Core PCE) price index for June on Friday (too late to affect the Fed’s deliberations on Tuesday and Wednesday). As far as the Fed is concerned, this is the true measure of inflation and will help inform their future interest rate decisions. It is forecast to be up 4.2% from a year earlier, a deceleration of 0.4 points compared with May.
We will also be presented with the latest Consumer Confidence Survey and the second advance estimate for the growth of US GDP for Q2 2023.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: United Healthcare, Johnson & Johnson) - up 3.9% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 2.7% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 162 and rose by 1 point last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 120 and fell by 5 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 68. SPY ended the week *5.3% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 63. IWM ended the week *19.8% below its all-time high (11/05/2021).
* RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.96%, one month ago: 6.39%, one year ago: 5.54%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 51% (41% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 27% (23% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 22% (36% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 29 (Bullish by 5 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on July 26th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 7%, one month ago: 26%)
(one week ago: 93%, one month ago: 74%)
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 2%, one month ago: 6%)
(one week ago: 28%, one month ago: 34%)
(one week ago: 70%, one month ago: 60%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.54%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (3.84%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week rose from 0.91% to 0.98%, indicating a further steepening of the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
A possible solution to a rich person’s problem.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
BULL TRAP
A bull trap denotes a reversal that forces market participants on the wrong side of price action to exit positions with unexpected losses.
Bull traps occur when buyers fail to support a rally above a breakout level.
Traders and investors can lower the frequency of bull traps by seeking confirmation following a breakout through technical indicators and/or pattern divergences.
A bull trap is a false signal, referring to a declining trend in a stock, index, or other security that reverses after a convincing rally and breaks a prior support level. The move "traps" traders or investors that acted on the buy signal and generates losses on resulting long positions. A bull trap may also refer to a whipsaw pattern.
A bull trap occurs when a trader or investor buys a security that breaks out above a resistance level—a common technical analysis-based strategy. While many breakouts are followed by strong moves higher, the security may quickly reverse direction. These are known as "bull traps" because traders and investors who bought the breakout are "trapped" in the trade.
Traders and investors can avoid bull traps by looking for confirmations following a breakout. For example, a trader may look for higher than average volume following a breakout to confirm that price is likely to move higher. A breakout that generates low volume could be a sign of a bull trap.
From a psychological standpoint, bull traps occur when bulls fail to support a rally above a breakout level, which could be due to a lack of momentum and/or profit-taking. Bears may jump on the opportunity to sell the security if they see divergences, dropping prices below resistance levels, which can then trigger stop-loss orders.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment or other financial decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Short and shallow seems to be the growing expectation surrounding any 2023 recession, if it ever even arrives at all. The US economy is stronger than most people expected and inflation is clearly stabilizing. This is the “immaculate disinflation” that many optimists talked about a year ago, with an economy simply showing signs of normalizing after a pandemic. Under this theory, the Federal Reserve may just get to have its cake and eat it, too.
At the beginning of the year, stocks were priced for a meaningful economic slowdown and an earnings drop that never in fact happened. This reality pushed stocks higher through the first quarter and April. Then, the “AI” craze hit markets and the super-cap tech names carried the S&P 500 higher almost by themselves - giving the (false) impression that the entire stock market was rallying hard and all worries about recession and corporate profit declines were gone. That caused more chasing from those who had sat out the rally up to that point and fueled even higher stock prices.
Now the S&P 500 is trading at a 16-month high based on three assumptions. These are the new pillars of the rally:
No economic slowdown (i.e., no landing or a soft landing)
A consistent drop in inflation (over the next few months)
Fed not hiking interest rates more than expected (one, maybe two at a push)
As long as the economic and inflation data does not damage those pillars, then stocks can hold onto, and maybe even slightly extend, this rally.
The S&P 500 is now only 6% below its all-time high from the first trading day of 2022. That’s quite extraordinary when you think about it. To extend the rally substantially from here and threaten those all-time highs, however, it will take the introduction of something new. Specifically:
Interest rates actually falling, and/or
Economic growth further re-accelerating, and/or
An increase in S&P 500 company earnings (specifically the Earnings per Share ratio).
The reality is that the risks still facing this market are essentially the same ones as we had to start the year. Just because they haven’t materialized yet does not mean that they are no longer present. It’s essential that these risks are monitored and watched for (as I will do for you weekly in this report) because, with pretty much zero cushion should they emerge, it’s a long way down to fundamental value if they do.
To that end, we saw last week that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation fell more than expected to an annualized rate of 3.0% (in fact, 2.97%, unrounded), down from 4.0% a month earlier. It has plunged from a 9.1% year-on-year rate last summer. The closely-watched Core CPI that strips out volatile food and energy costs cooled from 5.3% annualized in May to 4.8% in June.
It’s important, however, to take a step back and note that the headline rate’s big drop has a lot to do with the year-ago month rolling off. Remember, headline CPI rocketed 1.2% in June 2022 alone. Replacing that month in the calculation with June 2023's 0.2% increase shaved a full percentage point off the annual change all by itself.
As has been the case for ever, the financial and mainstream media focused on that drop in headline CPI to a multi-year low, but that’s not the number that the Fed is focused on. It’s that half point drop in annualized Core CPI to under 5% that was the diamond in this data as far as the Fed was concerned. .
CPI proved to be a crowd pleaser; stocks moved bigly higher, market interest rates shifted lower, oil and gold prices went back up and the US Dollar accelerated its decline. The next day, CPI’s twin brother, the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers rose just 0.1% from a month earlier and just 2.6% from a year before, the smallest advance since 2020, adding to the pile-on of positive inflation news.
The initial takeaway from the markets was that these numbers indicate that the worst of the inflation crisis looks to be firmly behind us and, while they may not move the needle in that the Fed will almost certainly still raise interest rates by a quarter of a point on July 26th (that probability remains at 93%, see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below), a second swift follow-up increase may be somewhat less likely now given this evidence of solid progress.
Consumer sentiment came in last week at its highest level since September 2021, with its biggest one month improvement since 2006.
The Q2 earnings deluge began on Thursday, investors getting another heathy dollop of good news with numbers from Pepsi, Delta Airlines, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citigroup all looking mighty fine.
Right now, the sun is shining and the birds are singing. It’s not a given that rain clouds will definitely move in, but it is very important to understand that if they do, the storm could be very sudden and very severe and the fact is that most investors are without an umbrella and dressed in t-shirts, shorts and flip-flops.
OTHER NEWS ..
Thursday was a busy day in crypto .. A federal judge came out with the bizarre ruling on Thursday that Ripple Labs’ crypto coin XRP was classified as a security (and therefore potentially subject to regulation from the Securities and Exchange Commission - SEC) if it was bought by an institution, such as a bank or a hedge fund. But, said US District Judge Analisa Torres, it is NOT a security if it is bought by a human being from the general public on an exchange(and therefore not subject to any SEC oversight).
Libertarian fiat-hating bros around the country rejoiced in their parents’ basements in San Francisco or in smelly wooden shacks piled high with ammunition and canned goods halfway up some mountain in Montana and crypto prices surged as the initial interpretation of this ruling was that it may make it more difficult for actual sensible adults to regulate what goes on in the cess-pool of fraud and criminality that is much of currently unregulated crypto-world and the boys may now be left alone and unsupervised to continue committing fraud and corruption and stealing their clients’ funds.
In an ironic twist, on the same day as this frankly nonsense ruling from Judge Torres, former Celsius Network CEO Alex Mashinsky joined the lengthy list of high-profile crypto industry figures to be arrested, accused by US prosecutors of pumping up the price of his firm’s cryptocurrency to entice (human being) customers to the platform — all so he could line his own pockets to the tune of $42 million. He faces both criminal charges and massive regulatory suits from the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
Mashinsky was criminally charged in a 46-page indictment with wire fraud and other crimes, after waging a years-long scheme to mislead customers, according to prosecuting attorneys, before Celsius - having gained popularity by paying high interest rates on digital-asset deposits - imploded last year with more than $1 billion in debt resulting in massive losses for its duped (mostly human being) customers. The company’s former Chief Revenue officer, Roni Cohen-Pavon was also charged with four criminal counts, including fraud - but he is currently hiding out back home in Israel.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
On the shorter term charts, the S&P 500 (which closed on Friday at 4505), blew through upside resistance levels of 4470 and 4485 with the next big one at 4560 while there is no big downside support until 4430.
In the more medium term, the next major upside resistance is at 4529 while initial downside support is down at 4375 and then not much until 4309.
So are bears fully back in hibernation?
While the last week’s index performance was pretty impressive, the improvement in Demand and retreat of Supply was far less so, another divergence between the index illusion and the technical reality.
Currently, we are observing the extraordinary condition of new all-time highs in Demand in the Large Cap segment with Small Caps rattling around near multi-year lows. Without a significant broadening in Demand, probabilities remain stacked against a self-sustaining advance.
From a technical standpoint, you can compare this rally to a game of musical chairs in which there are far more players (investors owning stocks) than chairs (willing buyers once stocks begin to decline) so if the “music stops” via some negative catalyst, whether it be sellers could overwhelm buyers and will drop sharply due to this low liquidity condition. Technical analysis is indicating that, in the not too distant future, the “music will stop” and volatility will rise considerably.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Q2 earnings season picks up this week. Around 60 S&P 500 firms are scheduled to report including Tesla, Netflix, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, American Express, IBM, Johnson and Johnson, United Airlines, American Airlines, Lockheed Martin, Newmont Mining, Taiwan Semiconductor and Prologis.
On the economic data front, it’s a real estate-y kind of week. On Tuesday, after we get Retail Sales - forecast to show a 0.4% monthly increase in consumer spending, it’s time for the Housing Market Index. The next day, we learn about Housing Starts and Existing Home Sales.
Thursday sees the release of the latest Leading Economic Index, which is currently on a streak of 14-straight monthly declines.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 3.5% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - unchanged for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 161 and rose by 4 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 125 and fell by 5 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a technically overbought RSI (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) of 70. SPY ended the week 6.0% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line, with a RSI of 62. IWM ended the week 21.0% below its all-time high** (11/05/2021).
** RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.81%, one month ago: 6.69%, one year ago: 5.51%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 41% (46% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 23% (29% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 36% (25% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 5 (Bullish by 21 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on July 26th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 7%, one month ago: 33%)
(one week ago: 93%, one month ago: 67%)
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 1%, one month ago: 10%)
(one week ago: 11%, one month ago: 39%)
(one week ago: 88%, one month ago: 51%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.53%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (3.83%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week rose from 0.88% to 0.91%, indicating a steepening of the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“A game of Russian roulette wouldn’t be so thrilling if you found out it was a full clip”. Don’t trade options.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
RELATIVE STRENGTH INDEX - RSI
The relative strength index (RSI) is a momentum indicator used in technical analysis. RSI measures the speed and magnitude of a security's recent price changes to evaluate overvalued or undervalued conditions in the price of that security.
The RSI is displayed as an oscillator (a line graph) on a scale of zero to 100. The indicator was developed by J. Welles Wilder Jr. and introduced in his seminal 1978 book, New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems.1
The RSI can do more than point to overbought and oversold securities. It can also indicate securities that may be primed for a trend reversal or corrective pullback in price. It can signal when to buy and sell. Traditionally, an RSI reading of 70 or above indicates an overbought situation. A reading of 30 or below indicates an oversold condition.
As a momentum indicator, the relative strength index compares a security's strength on days when prices go up to its strength on days when prices go down. Relating the result of this comparison to price action can give traders an idea of how a security may perform. The RSI, used in conjunction with other technical indicators, can help traders make better-informed trading decisions.
Periods with price losses are counted as zero in the calculations of average gain. Periods with price increases are counted as zero in the calculations of average loss.The standard number of periods used to calculate the initial RSI value is 14. For example, imagine the market closed higher seven out of the past 14 days with an initial average gain of 1%. The remaining seven days all closed lower with an initial average loss of −0.8%.
Once there are 14 periods of data available, the second calculation can be done. Its purpose is to smooth the results so that the RSI only nears 100 or zero in a strongly trending market.
After the RSI is calculated, the RSI indicator can be plotted beneath an asset’s price chart, as shown below. The RSI will rise as the number and size of up days increase. It will fall as the number and size of down days increase.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Fears of an imminent destructive recession and hopes of any interest rate cuts in 2023 are evaporating in equal measure, with each narrative pulling markets in opposite directions.
We learned last week that the Fed was apparently a lot less united at its recent interest rate-setting June meeting than the announced unanimous decision suggested. According to the minutes of that gathering released on Wednesday, some officials favored another quarter-point increase right then and there, but eventually went along somewhat reluctantly with a decision to pause the hikes.
Nearly all members of the rate-setting committee appeared to agree that additional rate increases would likely be needed this year, as the majority still believe there will be recession, albeit a mild one, at some point in the next year or so. The key takeaway? More interest rate hikes are coming, likely starting with the next meeting in a couple of weeks time. More on this later.
Stock markets are pricing in a continued drop in inflation and are not pricing in a meaningful slowdown in growth. Therefore, it logically follows that “stagflation” (stubbornly high inflation in a contracting economy) is the biggest kryptonite for stock prices since it would undermine all the “glass is half full” reasons for the recent rally.
So going into Friday’s Jobs Report, the greatest fear was that it could be stagflationary in nature. What would such a nightmare report look like? ..
very low job adds (an increase of 100k or below) - implying hiring is slowing,
the lack of a material increase in the unemployment rate (staying in the mid 3% area or lower) - which would keep the Fed hawkish and likely to continue raising rates higher for longer,
an increase in wage growth (5% or above) - which would imply a possible bounce back in inflation.
We got a hint on Thursday morning from the ADP private sector-only jobs report which showed more than double the expected level of job creation in June. We also learned from the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) that job cuts by US employers have now fallen to an eight-month low and the quits rate rose by the most in nine months, indicating workers still feel confident in their ability to secure another job and that reports of the end of the Great Resignation were highly exaggerated.
In a perfect example of the lack of room there is for any kind of disappointment that I mentioned in last week’s report, Thursday’s “pre-game” employment data sent stocks plunging and market interest rates surging on Thursday as the higher-for-longer interest rate storyline was strongly bolstered.
But when the real thing came out in the form of the Jobs Report on Friday morning before the market opened, it was reasonably Goldilocks with:
209k jobs added and a downward review of the previous month’s number,
a slight fall to a 3.6% unemployment rate, and
unchanged 4.4% wage growth.
However, the stock market went on to suffer further losses on Friday, albeit less dramatic than the day before.
It’s now pretty much case-closed for a definite quarter-point interest rate hike on July 26th after the next Fed meeting (93% probability - see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below) and the odds of an immediate follow-up second hike at the following meeting in September are now rising fast (up from nowhere to 24%).
We no longer have the cushion of low expectations provided by the very negative sentiment that we had at the beginning of the year. There now seems to be a broad assumption that stocks will move higher, a very different environment indeed.
Above 4,400 the S&P 500 has fully priced in a lot of good news (it closed on Friday at 4,399) and is also rather stretched from a valuation standpoint.
So, while the major indexes’ market momentum (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) continues to be higher, it’s important to be aware that if economic data and the state of Q2 earnings which start coming out this week (see THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR below) do suddenly turn negative (keep an eye on this weekly report for any signs that this may be the case) then there’s very little support for this market between here and at least 10% lower.
OTHER NEWS ..
Zuckerberg And Musk Face Off .. Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta/Facebook brought forward the launch of Threads, its “Twitter-Killer” micro-blogging social media site which cross-functions within Instagram, with an impressive sign-up rate of 75 million users in the first 48 hours (and that’s with it not even being available in Europe yet) and a lot of advertiser interest. The timing is smart with Twitter users growing more and more dissatisfied with the chaos on the site and open to something new following Elon Musk’s constant meddling with the platform’s features and vetting policies and the huge spike in both technical problems and trashy and toxic content since his takeover.
As The Wall Street Journal put it; “If you’re wondering what it’s like to use the new Threads app, just close your eyes and picture Twitter but with a lot less Elon Musk — and that’s exactly the point.”
Cash Is King In NYC ..More Manhattan property buyers are paying cash than at any other time on record as mortgage rates soar. According to a report on Bloomberg, about two-thirds of all purchases in Q2 2023 were completed without financing, the largest share since the tracking of payment methods began in 2014.
In the luxury tier (the top 10% of the market) the median price for Manhattan deals that closed in the quarter was $6.7 million, up 4% from a year earlier. Across all price ranges, properties traded at a median price of $1.2 million, down 4% from a year ago.
New Yorkers Can’t Catch A Break ... New York City’s air quality dropped once again to unhealthy levels on Wednesday. Instead of Canadian wildfires, however, Fourth of July fireworks and summer pollution were the main culprits this time. Those who managed to escape the city were just as unlucky, as sharks decided to join the rich and famous in hitting the Hamptons for the extended holiday break. Bloomberg reported that five swimmers are suspected to have been bitten.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The gap between the “Haves” and “Have Nots” is still very distinct in the US stock market. As in most societies, there are far more Have Nots than Haves but the Haves are doing very nicely, thank you very much.
Broad-based Demand, not selective strength, is what drives bull markets, especially at turning points in the cycle. To date, from their respective October lows, the S&P 500 Large Cap Index is up 23% the NYSE Composite Index (which covers all stocks trading on the New York Stock exchange regardless of company size) rose just over 16%, while the S&P 600 Small Cap Index has gained less than 13%.
Another reason for skepticism is that all these gains have also been accomplished on relatively low trading volume, indicating something of a lack of enthusiasm and urgency among buyers.
These cross-currents are very atypical of the dawn of a new bull market, but are very common in unhealthy advances that tend to flame out before becoming sustainable long term turnarounds and caution is still warranted unless or until sustained and powerful broad-based Demand emerges.
The rally from the October 2022 lows embodies technical characteristics inconsistent with a new bull market (as I keep saying over and over). Despite these facts, some may still ask whether it is possible that “this time things could be different?” Exceptions are always possible, but frankly, not probable. And technical analysis (indeed stock market strategy in general) is simply a business of probabilities.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
And they’re off!! .. Q2 earnings season begins this week including several large US banks set to report and then from there, we'll have weeks of corporate data to digest.
Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo will be this week's big banking earnings announcements. Pepsico, UnitedHealth Group, Delta Airlines, Blackrock, State Street, Conagra, Cintas and Fastenal are among the others who will also report this week.
The economic data highlight of the week will be Wednesday’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for June. Consensus estimates call for a fall to a 3.1% year-on-year rate of headline inflation, with the more closely-watched Core CPI rate seen rising at a 5.0% clip year-on-year. Both would be the slowest rates of inflation since 2021.
CPI’s sidekick, the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers for June will be released the next day.
Other data out this week include a pair of sentiment indicators; the Small Business Optimism Index and the Consumer Sentiment Index.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower) - up 0.3% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: United Health Group, Johnson & Johnson) - down 2.8% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 157 and fell by 8 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 130 and rose by 2 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 58. SPY ended the week 8.2% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It remains just above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 60. IWM ended the week 23.8% below its all-time high** (11/05/2021).
** RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.71%, one month ago: 6.71%, one year ago: 5.30%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
AAII INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 46% (42% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 29% (31% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 25% (27% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 21 (Bullish by 15 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.53%) being paid currently for the 6-month duration and the lowest rate (4.06%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week fell from 0.96% to 0.88%, indicating a flattening of the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The deeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on July 26th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 16%, one month ago: 35%)
(one week ago: 84%, one month ago: 65%)
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 1%, one month ago: 37%)
(one week ago: 14%, one month ago: 38%)
(one week ago: 85%, one month ago: 25%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
What people who messed up their retirement desperately want younger people to know to avoid their mistakes.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
MARKET MOMENTUM
Momentum is the rate of acceleration of a security's price—that is, the speed at which the price is changing. Market momentum refers to the aggregate rate of acceleration for the broader market as a whole.
Market momentum can be used as a measure of overall market sentiment that can support buying and selling with and against market trends. It is one of several indicators that can help an investor to follow price trends.
Generally, market momentum can be defined from the following equation:
M =V−Vx
where V = the latest price and Vx = the closing price x number of days ago
This equation can lead to the drawing of a trend line with varying periods used in the calculation.
Positive momentum can indicate a potential bullish trend while negative momentum can indicate a bearish trend. Broadly, momentum can be measured across both asset classes and individual securities, with market momentum, in particular, referring to the overall market.
Momentum trading is a strategy that seeks to capitalize on the momentum to enter a trend as it is picking up steam. In equities, broad market increases in corporate profits can help to create positive price momentum. In fixed income, falling interest rates can be a catalyst for price momentum.
In individual securities, market momentum for a particular stock can be driven by several factors. Positive momentum can be the result of increasing revenue, earnings, or sales. Positive momentum can also be influenced by a reduction in a company’s debt obligations and an increase in its projected cash flow.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Q2 and H1 2023 came to close on Friday. I’ll be releasing a full deep-dive review of the quarter in the financial markets in my feed in the next few days. For the moment, suffice to say that the TL;DR for the month of June is that it was defined by higher stock index prices but with a modest narrowing of the performance gap between the Super-Cap tech stocks and the rest of the market.
Recent events in Russia have obviously injected more geopolitical uncertainty into the world, but as long as commodity prices don’t spike meaningfully higher (which they didn’t during the March To Moscow and the aftermath), the stock market is largely ignoring any Russian political volatility.
Stock markets wilted early in the week when the International Monetary Fund (IMF) came out with a statement that gave a thumbs up and a gold star to central banks around the world for continuing with their aggressive interest rate-hiking campaigns, reserving special praise for the highly-proactive European Central Bank (ECB) which reiterated again last week that it plans to regularly raise interest rates over the summer.
The world's leading central bankers from Europe, the UK, Japan and the US (including Fed Chair Jerome Powell) gathered in the pretty resort town of Sintra in Portugal to sit on a lengthy panel. They all conceded that their forceful rate-hiking campaigns are taking much longer than expected to bring inflation back down to target, forcing them all into a higher-for-longer interest rate stance.
While the respective outlooks for major economies have begun to diverge, the US currently looks best positioned to avoid a recession. Nevertheless, Powell put resuming consecutive rate hikes over at least the next two Fed meetings very much back in play, making it clear that the Fed has absolutely not switched to an "every-other-meeting" cadence. "I wouldn't take moving rates on consecutive meetings off the table at all" he said.
These were fighting words aimed at a market that finally and reluctantly seems to be coming round to the idea that maybe the Fed isn’t bluffing about not soon pivoting to rate cuts (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below).
So if interest rates aren’t coming down any time soon, the best (only?) hope for an accelerating continuation of this stock market rally seems to be higher earnings. And that will begin to come into focus very soon as the Q2 2023 earnings season kicks off in a couple of weeks. As is the way of things, expectation-busting earnings reports will likely cause short-lived euphoria while disappointments will likely be severely punished.
Forecasts are mostly calling for a slight rise in earnings across the board, but there obviously will be outsized attention paid to what the big dogs (AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, TSLA, NVDIA etc.) and proxy stocks for economic activity (WMT, TGT, AMZN, FDX, UPS etc.) have to say. If earnings disappoint (particularly in mega-cap tech), there is definitely a downside risk to stock prices. I’ll stay on top of things there for you so you don’t have to.
Things got progressively more optimistic as the week went on.
In yet another blow to those recession truthers who bore on about how we already in a recession, the third and final estimate of Q1 2023 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) showed an annualized increase of 2.0%, a marked jump from the second estimate of 1.3%. The upward revision (along with the extremely low unemployment rate) refutes any mad idea that the US is currently undergoing any kind of recession.
Consumer confidence in June rose to the highest level since January 2022 and the durable goods numbers were consistent with the soft landing hypothesis.
Wall Street’s biggest banks passed the Federal Reserve’s annual stress test (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below).The 23 largest US lenders showed they could successfully withstand a severe global recession and turmoil in real estate markets, the central bank said on Wednesday.
Confidence abounded about the level of travel and hotel bookings for the July 4th holiday period
This is a market that is looking for any excuse to keep rallying and recently that excuse has been provided by some very solid economic data. If it’s this economic data that is going to help carry the S&P 500 even higher going forward, then it needs to remain really, really good. One of the problems is that it is not always that easy to define what is good and what is not-so-good.
A great example of what I mean by this was last week’s release of the highly-anticipated Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, the measure of inflation that the Federal Reserve likes to use to make its interest rate decisions.
It cooled much more than expected, with the headline number rising just 0.1% in the last month for an annualized inflation rate of 3.8%, substantially down from 4.4% the previous month. Looks great, right? Surely, the Fed can back off now, we are charging hard towards its target rate of 2%!
However, the important Core version (which strips out volatile food or energy prices) only inched down to 4.6% from 4.7% year-over-year. This metric’s much slower pace of decline confirms just how sticky proper inflation is proving to be, once you take out the effects of wildly-swinging commodity prices. The market knows that it is this Core number that the Fed focuses hardest on when planning its interest rate policy and that the central bank likely feels that there’s still a lot more work to be done to get core inflation to move down faster.
Momentum in stocks remains higher and the previous week’s pullback needs to be viewed primarily as digestion/consolidation of a pretty intense rally that dates back to April.
The two biggest threats to this rally, as mentioned earlier, are a) an economic slowdown, and b) a downside surprise in Q2 earnings. We need to continue to monitor these data points because disappointment in one or the other - or worse still, both - does have the power to quickly erase the current giddy optimism towards stocks and potentially cause a meaningful pullback.
OTHER NEWS ..
In The Money .. Wall Street interns are getting fatter paychecks. For finance jobs across the US, median intern pay jumped 19% at sixteen top firms studied by Levels.fyi and reported by Bloomberg. At Citadel and Citadel Securities for example, median intern compensation rose 37% in the space of a year to $120 an hour. That’s $19,200 per month before taxes or the annualized equivalent of a $230k salary. Shocker; the firms received 65% more applications compared to last year.
D.I.V.O.R.C.E. .. Goldman Sachs (GS) is desperately trying to end its partnership with Apple (AAPL). The bank had recently extended its partnership with the tech firm through the end of the decade, recently agreed to support Apple’s “buy now, pay later” offering and launched a collaborative retail bank account initiative.
Now it is apparently in talks to offload those businesses and its Apple credit-card partnership to American Express (AXP) and it seems that Goldman has also discussed transferring its credit card partnership with General Motors to Amex or, frankly, to anyone else who’ll listen.
A retreat from Apple and credit cards would basically end Goldman’s consumer-lending business after it recently stopped issuing personal loans, is trying to sell off GreenSky, the home-improvement lender it bought just last year and announced that it would be de-emphasizing its Marcus savings account product (corporate-speak for: we’ll probably be shutting it down or selling it off sometime soon).
Why is Goldman scrambling so hard to bail out of this arena and consign this experiment to the garbage can? Easy. In January, the bank disclosed that it had lost about $3 billion on its consumer-banking project since 2020.
Three Trill .. Unfazed by any imminent split with Goldman Sachs,Apple saw its valuation break through the $3,000,000,000,000 level last week. Apple is now worth more than the entire UK stock market, which is itself the third largest in the world.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Based on price action and breadth, the S&P 500 and NASDAQ-100 look solid. Therefore, if that is your entire investing world then, yes, we are in a bull market. The classic definition of a rising or bullish trend in prices is a series of higher highs and higher lows. No doubt, both these two indexes fulfill that basic requirement.
But that is where the label ends. As we move across the list of other major and minor market indexes, bull trends are almost entirely absent. Even the equal-weighted version of the S&P 500 (RSP) is in a flat range and well below its February high. A brief hope-inducing resurgence of smaller stock performance proved to be just a temporary tease.
If new bull markets are supposed to embrace risk, this is clearly not evident in the performance of the Mid-, Small- and Micro-Cap indexes, the last of which has already spent time beneath its prior October 2022 lows.
Based on decades of history, the high probability is that this weak breadth will eventually matter. Sustainable rallies have almost always depended on broad and robust participation from all corners of the market, which is not the case in at the moment.
Though against the odds, it is still possible however that the indicators will catch up to price rather than price falling to the indicators. However, until we see technical evidence of this, it’s important not to get infected with a bad case of FOMO.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The stock market will close early on Monday ahead of the July 4th holiday and remain closed on Tuesday. Investors will return on Wednesday to a busy set of macro-economic news.
The highlights will be two big data releases related the critical matter of the state of the US labor market. On Thursday, we get the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS). The consensus call is for 9.9 million job openings, which would be down slightly from the previous month.
Then comes Jobs Report Friday. A gain of 212k payrolls in June is expected when the number is released before the market opens, following an increase of 339k in May. The unemployment rate is forecast to hold steady at 3.7% and average hourly earnings are seen rising an unchanged 0.3%.
Also out this week will be the minutes from the Fed's mid-June monetary policy meeting which will be closely combed through for any enhanced insight into how the committee is thinking.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 4.0% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 0.4% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 165 and rose by 9 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 128 and fell by 12 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 68. SPY ended the week 7.2% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of the 3,000 largest US stocks. It remains just above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 61. IWM ended the week 22.8% below its all-time high** (11/05/2021).
** RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.67%, one month ago: 6.79%, one year ago: 5.70%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 42% (43% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 31% (29% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 27% (28% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 15 (Bullish by 15 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. shorter term interest rates are generally higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.50%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (3.81%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week fell slightly from 0.97% to 0.96%, indicating a very slight flattening of the inversion of the curve during the last week.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The deeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 5%, one month ago: 30%)
(one week ago: 32%, one month ago: 34%)
(one week ago: 63%, one month ago: 36%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on July 26th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 26%, one month ago: 19%)
(one week ago: 74%, one month ago: 53%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
I don’t know about you, but I already know what I’ll be doing on September 22nd!! :-)
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
BANK STRESS TESTS
A bank stress test is an analysis conducted under hypothetical scenarios designed to determine whether a bank has enough capital to withstand a negative economic shock. These scenarios include unfavorable situations, such as a deep recession or a financial market crash. In the United States, banks with $50 billion or more in assets are required to undergo internal stress tests conducted by their own risk management teams and the Federal Reserve.
Bank stress tests were widely put in place after the 2008 financial crisis. Many banks and financial institutions were left severely undercapitalized. The crisis revealed their vulnerability to market crashes and economic downturns. As a result, federal and financial authorities greatly expanded regulatory reporting requirements to focus on the adequacy of capital reserves and internal strategies for managing capital. Banks must regularly determine their solvency and document it.
Stress tests focus on a few key areas, such as credit risk, market risk, and liquidity risk to measure the financial status of banks in a crisis. Using computer simulations, hypothetical scenarios are created using various criteria from the Federal Reserve and International Monetary Fund (IMF). The European Central Bank (ECB) also has strict stress testing requirements covering approximately 70% of the banking institutions across the eurozone. Company-run stress tests are conducted on a semiannual basis and fall under tight reporting deadlines.
All stress tests include a standard set of scenarios that banks might experience. A hypothetical situation could involve a specific disaster in a particular place—a Caribbean hurricane or a war in Northern Africa. Or it could include all of the following happening at the same time: a 10% unemployment rate, a general 15% drop in stocks, and a 30% plunge in home prices. Banks might then use the next nine quarters of projected financials to determine if they have enough capital to make it through the crisis.
The main goal of a stress test is to see whether a bank has the capital to manage itself during tough times. Banks that undergo stress tests are required to publish their results. These results are then released to the public to show how the bank would handle a major economic crisis or a financial disaster.
Regulations require banks that do not pass stress tests to cut their dividend payouts and share buybacks to preserve or build up their capital reserves. That can prevent under-capitalized banks from defaulting and stop a run on the banks before it starts.
Critics claim that stress tests are often overly demanding. By requiring banks to be able to withstand once-in-a-century financial disruptions, regulators force them to retain too much capital. As a result, there is an under-provision of credit to the private sector. That means creditworthy small businesses and first-time homebuyers may be unable to get loans. Overly strict capital requirements for banks have even been blamed for the relatively slow pace of the economic recovery after 2008.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based on any of the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
US stocks endured a difficult holiday-shortened week amid concerns that higher interest rates could cause a slowdown in economic growth both here and abroad and a sense that stock market professionals may be starting to take profits on mega-cap tech and put the proceeds into bonds.
There was also a feeling coming into the week that the recent rally had stretched short term valuations a bit and some cooling off of an over-bought condition was to be expected. And that’s exactly what we saw. The S&P 500 snapped its five-week winning streak, falling more than 1.4% (its worst week since March).
Investors have been yawning at “Fedspeak” from various Federal Reserve officials and regional Presidents which has gone in one ear and out the other for about a year now. They have been indulging in a FOMO/AI-led rally since March and scornfully dismissing the notion of any interest rate-related economic pain and an earnings-wrecking recession.
The stock market is essentially saying that it simply doesn’t share the Fed’s ongoing caution and is choosing to disregard it. One side or the other is going to be very wrong here and will have to back down from their current position.
Markets would love a definitive all-clear signal from the Fed that the end of the rate-hiking cycle has arrived. But they are not even getting a sniff.
Last week saw the launch of an onslaught of Fedspeak specifically aimed at pushing back on this stock market skepticism, particularly when Fed Chair Jerome Powell told a House panel that he fully expects more interest rate increases ahead because getting inflation under control “has a long way to go”, while also saying that the frequency of increases would be“more moderate” than the fast and furious back-to-back-to-back rate hikes of the previous fifteen months.
He described the idea of two more rate hikes this year as“a pretty good guess”. The comments were clearly intended to press home the message that the Fed’s June inaction was very much a pause and very not a halt.
Other central banks around the world were also scrambling last week to regain their credibility with a constant drumbeat of attempts to shock markets into believing in stickier inflation (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) and a long, hot summer of ongoing interest rate rises in response. Turkey, which long ago lost the battle to restore any kind of investor trust and is now basically a financial basket case, raised interest rates to 15%.
In the post-Brexit UK, core inflation is at its highest level since Sir Mix-a-Lot pointed out that baby got back in 1992 and food inflation there is currently running at over 18% per year. British bond markets are now even frothier than they were during the chaotic times of Liz Truss’ unhinged 49-day reign as Prime Minister last year. Of the top 25 economies in the world, only Argentina and Turkey currently have a higher level of inflation than the UK. The Bank of England (BOE) reacted with a half a percent hike in interest rates, as did the central bank of Norway. The BOE made it clear that at least three more rises were in the hopper, which is terrifying variable rate mortgage holders who do not have access to long-term fixed rate products like in the US. Meanwhile, the Swiss central bank followed the previous week’s example of the European Central Bank and raised by a quarter of a percent and they also warned of more hikes soon.
The problem with this current consensus view by central banks around the world is that many of the effects of their already-implemented rate hikes have not yet been felt in their economies. Rises in interest rates usually take months or quarters to meaningfully impact growth. Additionally, the economic data that policymakers are relying on for their inflation readings is, by definition, lagging data.
Put these two issues together and you can easily see why many feel that the central banks (including the Fed) are risking an overshoot of interest rate rises which could, of itself, directly cause a painful global recession. This conclusion is strengthened by that often reliable recession indicator, the deepening inversion of the US yield curve (as measured by 2 year interest rates vs. the 10 year), which hit a 40-year high with the shorter rate 0.97% higher than the longer rate on Tuesday morning and stayed there all week (see US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE below).
On the more optimistic side of things, however, when you look at the important pieces of economic data and track them over recent months, a soft landing (inflation eventually conquered without a meaningful recession) still appears more likely than a hard one. There are few signs that US consumer spending is materially slowing and business spending remains robust. Expectations for the upcoming Q2 2023 earnings season (which kicks off in just three weeks) are quietly ticking higher.
To be clear, this analysis does not mean a hard landing won’t happen. But so far, it’s evident that it isn’t happening. Yes, the economy is most definitely slowing and potential weakness in the service sector and labor market will be significant negatives for growth if they get materially worse. But for now, economic growth is moderating at a pace that is considered consistent with a soft landing and that’s one of the reasons that stocks have proven so resilient in recent weeks.
OTHER NEWS ..
Not so charitable any more .. Charities love to say that "every penny counts". In reality though, individual charitable donations have never mattered less. As reported by Axios last week, it's increasingly just a small number of ultra-high net worth individuals, alongside even fewer old money foundations, who determine whether charities thrive or fall apart.
There's a move away from the previous model of raising smaller sums from many households and toward a much more targeted strategy of just cultivating wealthy donors (or at least the kind of people who still itemize their taxes and can claim the charitable tax deduction) or corporations.
By the numbers:Overall charitable donation in the US dropped in 2022 by $17.3 billion. The amount given by corporations went up, as did bequests and contributions from foundations. But, in a year when Americans’ disposable cash levels have never been higher, charitable giving by individuals fell by a massive $21.9 billion, causing the overall decline.
WFH is winning .. With the pandemic well behind us, evidence continues to mount that working from home will be a lasting feature of the American economy. It's hard to overstate the importance of the fact that more than one-third of American workers aren't schlepping into the workplace each day.
Vast amounts of empty downtown office space, high demand for suburban housing and major shifts in consumer behavior and buying patterns are just a few of the transformative economic changes that can be traced to the WFH revolution.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics' annual survey on Americans’ time use provides some of the most authoritative readings on the trend.
Nearly 35% of American workers worked from home on an average day last year, up from just 22% a decade earlier.
Yes, but: Peak work from home (nearly 40% in 2021) may be behind us.
The work-from-home trend is far more pronounced among those with college degrees, of whom about 54% work from home on an average day.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 came into last week as technically overbought as it has been since 2020 and the risks of a profit-taking pullback loomed large and so it proved as the index moved lower on three of the four trading days, with Friday being the worst of the bunch.
The disjointed recent advance in the Large Cap-weighted price indexes since last October has been anything but typical of a new bull market, as I have repeatedly emphasized in this report. The burden is now on the buyers to extensively broaden the rally into the Mid and Small Cap corners of the market so that it can be sustained. Like a freight train, the more stocks that are moving in the same direction, the more difficult it is to reverse course.
However, unfortunately for the bulls, beneath the surface of index price returns, Small Cap breadth remains exceptionally weak relative to what’s going on in Large Cap-world. A fairly pitiful number of Small Cap stocks are trading above their long term moving averages and a pretty alarming number are trading 20% or more below their one year highs. While Large Cap stocks are now only about 9% below their all-time highs, Small Cap stocks are still over 25% away from theirs.
So this is where the focus needs to be now - rather than getting all excited because Microsoft makes a new all-time high or Tesla shifts 3% in a day or whatever. In terms of assessing the true validity of this rally, it’s all about what’s happening with the Small Caps.
In keeping with this sentiment, I am now including data on IWM, the Small Cap ETF in my LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS section below.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
A small number of companies are scheduled to report earnings this week, including Nike, General Mills, Walgreens, Carnival, Micron, Paychex and Constellation Brands.
The Federal Reserve will reveal the results of its annual stress test of America’s largest banks, including determining how much banks can return to shareholders via stock buybacks and dividends.
Economic data out this week will include Durable Goods, New Home Sales and Personal Income and Expenditures data for which expectations are a 0.4% rise in income and a 0.3% increase in spending. The big one, though, is the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure, which is what influences its interest rate decisions, the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index. It is forecast to be up 4.7% from a year earlier, unchanged from the previous month.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Walmart, Pepsico) - up 0.3% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis Inc., American Tower Corp) - down 2.9% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 156 and fell by 9 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 140 and rose by 13 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 Large Cap ETF, is made up of the stocks of the 500 largest US companies. It remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a no-longer-overbought RSI of 58. SPY ended the week 9.3% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
IWM, the Russell 2000 Small Cap ETF, is made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of the group of 3,000 largest US stocks. It remains just above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 48. IWM ended the week 25.6% below its all-time high** (11/05/2021).
** RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically overbought, RSI below 30: technically oversold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.69%, one month ago: 6.57%, one year ago: 5.81%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 43% (45% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 29% (32% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 28% (23% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 15 (Bullish by 22 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market.
It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. most shorter term interest rates are higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.44%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (3.74%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week rose from 0.93% to 0.97%, indicating an overall deepening of the inversion of the curve during the last week and its deepest level in four decades.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The deeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 82%)
(one week ago: 24%, one month ago: 15%)
(one week ago: 76%, one month ago: 18%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on July 26th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 26%, one month ago: 58%)
(one week ago: 74%, one month ago: 42%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Volatility is timeless and wild swings in sentiment are the rule, not the exception”More enduring market wisdom from Josh Brown.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
INFLATION
Inflation is a rise in prices, which can be translated as the decline of purchasing power over time. The rate at which purchasing power drops can be reflected in the average price increase of a basket of selected goods and services over some period of time. The rise in prices, which is often expressed as a percentage, means that a unit of currency effectively buys less than it did in prior periods. Inflation can be contrasted with deflation, which occurs when prices decline and purchasing power increases.
While it is easy to measure the price changes of individual products over time, human needs extend beyond just one or two products. Individuals need a big and diversified set of products as well as a host of services for living a comfortable life. They include commodities like food grains, metal, fuel, utilities like electricity and transportation, and services like healthcare, entertainment, and labor.
Inflation aims to measure the overall impact of price changes for a diversified set of products and services. It allows for a single value representation of the increase in the price level of goods and services in an economy over a period of time.
Prices rise, which means that one unit of money buys fewer goods and services. This loss of purchasing power impacts the cost of living for the common public which ultimately leads to a deceleration in economic growth. The consensus view among economists is that sustained inflation occurs when a nation's money supply growth outpaces economic growth.
Inflation is measured in a variety of ways depending on the types of goods and services. It is the opposite of deflation, which indicates a general decline in prices when the inflation rate falls below 0%. Keep in mind that deflation shouldn't be confused with disinflation, which is a related term referring to a slowing down in the (positive) rate of inflation.
Depending upon the selected set of goods and services used, multiple types of baskets of goods are calculated and tracked as price indexes.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI)
The CPI is a measure that examines the weighted average of prices of a basket of goods and services that are of primary consumer needs. They include transportation, food, and medical care.
CPI is calculated by taking price changes for each item in the predetermined basket of goods and averaging them based on their relative weight in the whole basket. The prices in consideration are the retail prices of each item, as available for purchase by the individual citizens.
Changes in the CPI are used to assess price changes associated with the cost of living, making it one of the most frequently used statistics for identifying periods of inflation or deflation. In the U.S., the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports the CPI on a monthly basis and has calculated it as far back as 1913.
The Producer Price Index (PPI)
The PPI is a family of indexes that measures the average change in selling prices received by domestic producers of intermediate goods and services over time. The PPI measures price changes from the perspective of the seller and differs from the CPI which measures price changes from the perspective of the buyer.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It was quite an extraordinary week in financial markets and potentially a very consequential one. The S&P 500 closed on Thursday at a higher level than it was the day before the Federal Reserve first started raising interest rates in March 2022. In other words, the index has now officially erased more than a year of Fed-inflicted interest rate pain.
By the time the Fed meeting wrapped up on Wednesday, we had already received significant correspondence from the trenches of the war on inflation. When the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for May came out the day before, we learned that retail inflation has now fallen to below half of last year’s peak, but still remains well above what Federal Reserve officials would like to see.
Overall consumer prices increased just 0.1% from April to May, down from the prior month’s 0.4% increase for a solid drop in the annualized rate to 4.0%, down from 4.9%. The important Core CPI readings which strip out food and energy costs rose 0.4% month-over-month and 5.3% annualized, emphasizing the heavy impact of declining energy prices on the headline readings.
The year-ahead inflation expectations from consumers dropped to 3.3% which, interestingly, is exactly the average annual level of inflation in the US since 1914.
The Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers, which came out early on Wednesday morning shortly before the Fed interest rate announcement, showed an astonishing annualized rate of just 1.1%, well down from 2.9% thirty days earlier.
Markets had already been pretty confident of a long-awaited pause in interest rate hikes by the Fed the next day, but this inflation data sent the probability of no change soaring to 95% going into the Fed announcement on Wednesday afternoon.
What suddenly became important was the “Dot Plot” that the Fed releases quarterly with its interest rate decision. This shows the anticipated future trajectory of interest rates according to each member of the rate-setting committee (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK, below).
And while the Fed did indeed deliver an announcement of no change in interest rates this time around (a unanimous call) ending 15 months of non-stop hikes, the dot plot showed that 12 of the 18 policymakers penciled in a 2023 year-end Fed Funds rate at or above 5.625% - versus the current rate of 5.125% that they just left unchanged.
So the forecasts implied that a majority of the committee members expect at least two additional quarter-point rate hikes (or one half-point increase) across the four remaining upcoming meetings of the year set for July, September, November and December. One committee member even foresees a full percentage point increase between now and New Year’s Eve.
Following the announcement of no change and the release of the dot plot, Fed Chair Jerome Powell, normally very affable and relaxed at press conferences, appeared rather edgy and irritable when faced with spikier-than-normal questions from financial journalists.
The dot plot initially shocked stock markets whose first reaction was take a big swan dive, but most markets then quickly reversed back upwards when Powell noticeably failed to take the opportunity when it was offered to him by a reporter to commit to a rate hike in July. In the end, most major stock indexes finished Wednesday basically unchanged from Tuesday’s close.
Bond yields (market-driven interest rates) predictably surged in reaction to the dot plot with shorter term rates reacting particularly violently. With shorter term yields moving higher faster than longer term ones, the benchmark inversion of the yield curve between the 2 year and the 10 year steepened further (see US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE below), pushing towards record territory.
Once again however, stock market professionals seem to be saying that the Fed’s bark is worse than its bite and simply do not believe the dots (which frankly, do have a shaky track record of being ultimately correct). They are wondering aloud that if at least two more hikes really are still necessary, then why not implement one last week? When it was thrown at him, Powell’s answer to that question in the press conference was less than convincing. The sense hung in the air that a rather weak Fed was too afraid of causing a market surprise by raising rates when almost everyone expected them not to.
Stand by for a lot of chatter from Fed officials and presidents in the coming days and weeks as they try to roll out the central bank’s messaging and probably get into a verbal war with a once-again highly skeptical stock market which essentially showed its middle finger to the Fed on Thursday by moving considerably higher, including a new all-time high for Microsoft (MSFT).
In contrast, the Fed’s equivalent, the European Central Bank (ECB) showed much less concern for what the market thinks and raised its interest rate to 3.5%, the highest level in more than two decades. Unlike Powell, ECB President Christine Lagarde shut down debate and nuance and explicitly told everyone to expect even more hikes in the next meeting or even two as the central bank raised its expectations for upcoming Eurozone inflation. This followed recent interest rate hikes from central banks in the UK, Australia and Canada. The US Fed is beginning to look like a bit of an outlier.
Having said all that, not a single dot anywhere on the Fed’s chart indicated an interest rate cut in 2023. Realistic hopes of a swift Fed pivot to actually cutting rates are now in tatters. Powell even referred to the possibility of rate cuts as probably being “a couple of years out” in his press conference.
The deemed probability of interest rates being any lower at the end of the year is now 0%, quite the turnaround from the 100% certainty assigned to this outcome by the market just six weeks ago (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below).
OTHER NEWS ..
Beyoncé caused inflation in Sweden .. Beyoncé, who launched her world tour in Sweden last month, is partially responsible for the rise of inflation in the country in May, according to Michael Grahn, Danske Bank’s chief economist.
Data published on Wednesday from Statistics Sweden showed that monthly inflation increased there by 0.3% from April to May. The hike was in large part due to a significant increase in prices paid for "a broad set of goods and services, for instance hotel and restaurant visits" and "recreational services" , which include concert tickets.
It seems that Beyoncé's two concerts in the Stockholm were partly to blame. Grahn estimated that two-thirds of that 0.3% inflation experienced in the country in May was tied to Beyoncé’s concerts there on May 10th and 11th. He did also say that"We expect this upside surprise to be reversed in June as prices on hotels and tickets reverse back to normal."
Another one bites the dust .. Crypto exchange CoinEx accepted a ban from operating in New York and to pay $1.8 million to settle state Attorney General Letitia James' lawsuit accusing the cryptocurrency exchange of operating illegally because it failed to register with the state and was unlawfully offering crypto tokens like AMP, LBRY, LUNA and Rally.
CoinEx (otherwise known as Vino Global) can no longer offer, sell or buy securities or commodities in New York and cannot make its platform available anywhere in the state. The settlement includes over a million dollars of refunds to thousands of investors plus a fine. The case was part of James’ enforcement efforts to rein in what she has called "shadowy" crypto companies.
Also, in a reminder of the apparently endless lingering risks of the lack of regulation in the space, South Korean-based crypto lenders Delio and Haru Invest - who each advertised double-digit yields for investors around the world who lent crypto on the platforms - both halted client withdrawals, which is usually a prelude to customers losing all of their deposits.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The 4,300-4,330 price area in the S&P 500 index was identified as where stocks stalled last August before falling to new 52-week lows in October and also as the 50% retracement line of the selloff of 2022. The index blew through that level, closing on Thursday at 4425 and still remained above that zone even after a mild pullback on Friday.
It was notable that on Wednesday that while the S&P 500 and NASDAQ Large Cap universe recovered pretty much all the losses they suffered immediately on interest rate fears after the dot plot came out to end the day essentially flat, Small Cap stocks - which outnumber Large Caps by a wide margin - pointedly failed to recover at all, ending the day down over 1.0%. This was yet another example of two very different worlds operating completely independently of each other within the same stock market, but the headlines only focus on one of them.
This is the so-called “Mega-Cap mirage” which may be prematurely projecting the illusion of a new bull market, since it is Small Cap stocks - not their Large Cap cousins - that historically have led the charge from major market bottoms. and the relative performance of the Mid Cap and Small Cap stocks lagged that of Large Cap yet again last week.
As I have mentioned many times, none of the traditional signs of a market bottom (capitulation, conviction, and correlation) were measurably realized when the October 2022 lows were established and this continues to nag at technical analysis crowd.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
US stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday in observance of Juneteenth National Independence Day. There’ll be just a handful of earnings reports during the week as well as two days of semi-annual Congressional testimony to the Senate Banking Committee from Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell.
FedEx, Accenture, Car Max, FactSet and Darden Restaurants report this week.
There will be plenty of data out on the state of the US housing market, including the Housing Market Index, Residential Construction data and Existing Home Sales.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - up 4.4% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - down 0.6% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 167 and rose by 9 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 127 and fell by 10 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a technically over-bought RSI of 71. SPY ended the week 8.0% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a technically over-bought RSI of 75. QQQ ended the week 8.9% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically over-bought; RSI below 30: technically over-sold
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.71%, one month ago: 6.31%, one year ago: 5.78%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 45% (45% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 32% (31% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 23% (24% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 22 (Bullish by 21 a week ago)
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffet.
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market.
It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. most shorter term interest rates are higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.38%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (3.77%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week rose significantly from 0.79% to 0.93%, indicating an overall steepening of the inversion of the curve during the last five days.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term. The steeper the inversion, the greater the deemed risk of recession.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 16%)
(one week ago: 30%, one month ago: 61%)
(one week ago: 70%, one month ago: 23%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on July 26th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 23%)
(one week ago: 30%, one month ago: 61%)
(one week ago: 53%, one month ago: 16%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
When it comes to investing, doing nothing is harder than it sounds.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
FED DOT PLOT
Dot plots are well known as the method that the Fed uses to convey its benchmark federal funds interest rate outlook at certain Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings. FOMC members place dots on the dot plot denoting their projections for future interest rates in subsequent years and in the longer run.
The FOMC dot plot is one of the more famous dot plots, where each dot marks where a respective FOMC member expects the federal funds rate to be at the end of a particular period.
Usually, the overall FOMC outlook for interest rates in any given year is reported as the median of the dots that show up on the dot plot. The Fed's dot plot projections are closely watched by investors and economists for indications of the future trajectory of interest rates.
Keep in mind, when you're looking at the FOMC chart, that each dot represents a member’s view of the range where rates should be at that time. Their dot is in the center of the range. In other words, the dots shouldn't be taken to represent that a member is targeting that specific number. Importantly, it is not known which dot belongs to which FOMC member.
It’s also important to remember that the Fed is largely data-driven, and so it constantly adjusts its expectations and rates based on economic trends and global events. In the event of major developments, such as a terrorist attack, a severe economic downturn, or a sharp jump in inflation, the most recent dot chart may no longer represent members' projections.
As a result, the longer-term projections on the dot plot carry less weight than those that are closer to the present. Changes among Fed leadership—as terms expire, people resign, and others step up to fill the vacated positions—add to the potential for long-term policy shifts.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
According to Wall Street’s categorization rules, the S&P 500 index exited bear market territory on Thursday when it closed up more than 20% from its lows from October of last year after spending 248 days there - the longest bear stretch since 1948. However, it still ended the week 10% below its all-time high from January 3rd 2022.
While there’s absolutely nothing in the rules that says we can’t roll over into another new bear market right away, this one we’ve just been through is technically over. For what that’s worth.
With shadow of a debt ceiling crisis now gone and the regional banking catastrophe simply not happening, the path to additional positive surprises is getting narrower and, because so much good news has been priced in already, even a near-perfect best case scenario will likely produce only a modest further rally. Any kind of disappointment, on the other hand, could easily open up a quick 5-10% downward “air pocket” in stock prices, particularly for those assets that have done so well in recent weeks.
Having said that, there’s a definite sense that FOMO is starting to grip those who are under-invested or who’ve been waiting around on the sidelines as the biggest influence on their decision-making shifts from fear at the beginning of the year to extreme greed now (see this report’s new weekly feature; the FEAR & GREED INDEX below).
There’s a growing perception that it might be a bigger risk to be out of the stock market rather than in it. That’s the very definition of the “pain trade”, professional money managers buying stocks not because it’s a rational considered choice, but because they feel pressured to do so by a growing fear of missing an opportunity. Indeed, the head of Citigroup’s US Equity Trading Strategy acknowledged this sentiment just last week when he said on Bloomberg TV, “We are reluctantly staying in the tech trade.”
This causes them to frantically chase stocks higher, driving the indexes up. Until one day they stop. Which could then leave the market a bit like Wile E. Coyote when he suddenly stops running and realizes he has just chased the Roadrunner over the edge of a cliff.
We’re seeing a shift in sector leadership as markets embrace hope for a more broadly robust economy and grow in belief in the soft landing and I would expect the performance gap between the recently-ripping tech and tech-adjacent sectors and the so-far-lagging, more value-oriented consumer sectors to continue to narrow in the short term, at least.
A greater-than-expected rise in weekly unemployment claims on Thursday increased the bets that the Fed will pause raising interest rates this week. It’s important to note that the Fed being “on hold” should not be confused with “job done”. There has been a subtle shift in language from “pause” to “skip” when discussing the Fed not hiking on Wednesday, which is trying to communicate that a pause isn’t a permanent on-hold and it certainly doesn’t mean that rate cuts are imminent.
Tuesday's release of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for May and Wednesday morning’s release of the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers will both be major influences on the Fed who will announce their interest rate decision later on Wednesday (at 2pm ET). While red-hot inflation could spell trouble for those betting on a June pause followed swiftly by a rate cut, definitive signs of a cooldown could have the capability to keep the upward momentum in stock prices going for a while longer.
Interest rates across the old British empire continue to move higher as central banks in Australia and Canada both surprised markets by hiking a quarter of a point last week, citing still-elevated inflation. Particularly in the case of Canada, this rate increase followed a lengthy pause. Blueprint for the Fed?
As can be seen in the FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below, many stock market participants still believe that the next change in US interest rates after the assumed pause/skip this time around will be a downward one. The Bank of Canada just reminded us that this may well not be the case.
The World Bank (WB) released updated growth forecasts on Wednesday. The revisions were to the upside with the WB’s anticipated US growth rate for 2023 being raised from 0.5% in January to 1.1%. Global growth expectations also increased from 1.7% in January to 2.1%, with the bank citing “greater-than-expected resilience in major world economies.”
Goldman Sachs analysts came out last week and announced; “We have cut our judgmental probability that the US economy will enter a recession in the next twelve months back to 25%, undoing our upward revision to 35% shortly after the Silicon Valley Bank failure ..“
While a Wall Street analyst’s measure of success is generally a matter of being just slightly less wrong than a competitor, this shift is symptomatic of the mood of many investors that the economic landing may well be softer than was feared coming into 2023. And if there is going to be a meaningful recession, it will be the most well-telegraphed and anticipated one in history as little else has been on investors’ minds for over a year now.
Oh, and Wall Street will simply yawn at the arrival of yet another Trump legal circus just like it has done historically.
OTHER NEWS ..
Regulators at the SEC have had crypto in their sights for a while. Last week they pulled the trigger ..
After months of teasing, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) finally took the gloves off last week when it comes to investor protection in the world of crypto. On Tuesday the SEC sued Coinbase (COIN), alleging that the US’s largest crypto platform violated rules that require it to be held accountable and to register as an exchange and be overseen by the federal agency - predictably crashing the stock. The SEC filed the lawsuit in Manhattan federal court. The SEC alleged that Coinbase traded at least 13 crypto assets that are really unregistered securities (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK, below) and should have been registered with regulators before they were issued and also that there was illicit activity in crypto-staking. Registration typically involves giving investors financial statements and detailed risk disclosures that are reviewed by regulators.
The case came just 24 hours after the regulator’s 136-page enforcement action against Binance and its founder ChangPeng Zhao alleging that the world’s largest crypto exchange is not only operating an illegal trading platform in the US but (unlike on the list of the Coinbase charges) also improperly misused (pretty much legal-speak for “stole”) customers’ funds, directing them into other entities owned by CZ in a manner that has echoes of the fraudulent activity allegedly carried out by Sam Bankman-Fried at FTX (SBF is facing a criminal trial and potentially decades in jail if convicted). Later in the week, some highly-incriminating messages from CZ were released by the SEC.
Kicking laser-eyed crypto bros while they were down, SEC chairman Gary Gensler, a former MIT blockchain professor who actually really knows his crypto st, then came out and said on CNBC that cryptocurrencies are essentially unnecessary in today’s world; “Look, we don’t need more digital currency,” he said “We already have digital currency. It’s called the US dollar. It’s called the euro or it’s called the yen; they’re all digital right now. We already have digital investments.”
Matt Levine of Bloomberg put it this way .. “The SEC, I think, learned three lessons: 1) Almost all crypto tokens are securities, 2) Winning cases against crypto projects for doing illegal securities offerings is pretty easy, 3) Especially when they are also frauds”.
John Reed Stark, former SEC enforcement attorney, even went as far as to say in response to last week’s enforcement actions; “I think anyone who has crypto on any exchange should take it off of that exchange immediately. Period, end of story.”
Oh Elon! ..
Fresh from watching his Space X rocket exploding right after launch, recently learning from Fidelity that Twitter is actually worth only about a third of what he paid for it and spectacularly bungling the launch of Ron DeSantis’ presidential campaign, Elon Musk has even more serious problems coming his way. He is now being accused of insider trading in a class action law suit by multiple investors who say he manipulated the cryptocurrency Dogecoin, costing them billions of dollars.
In a filing in Manhattan federal court, it was claimed by investors that Musk used Twitter posts, highly-paid online influencers, his awkward 2021 appearance on NBC's "Saturday Night Live" and other "publicity stunts" to trade manipulatively and make money at their expense through several Dogecoin wallets controlled by him or by Tesla. The accusation is that Musk deliberately and strategically drove up Dogecoin's price more than 36,000% in a scheming manner over the course of two years only to then let it crash, enriching himself along the way.
They said that this strategy included, in April of this year, Musk briefly replacing Twitter's blue bird logo with that of Dogecoin's Shiba Inu dog, which led to a swift 30% spike in Dogecoin's price into which Musk then proceeded to sell $124 million-worth of the cryptocurrency.
A "deliberate course of carnival barking, market manipulation and insider trading" enabled Musk to defraud investors while enriching and promoting himself and his companies, according to the filing.
Watch this space, it could get spicy.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Technical analysis advocates will tell you that the market has a memory. The last time the index got up to 4300 in August of last year, we ran out of buyers and it quickly sank. It closed at 4298 on Friday, so it will be interesting to see what happens from here.
While Buying Power vs Selling Pressure and breadth dynamics have improved nicely over the last couple of weeks, there’s still a slightly disconcerting pattern of trading volume expanding on the down days and falling on the up days. And a fundamental technical rationale for the S&P 500's 20% rally since October is still kind of missing when you compare that data with that of pretty much every other major market bottom in history.
To technical analysts, if October 2022 was indeed the final turning point, then it seems too good to be true and that bothers them. Others may point out that COVID and the Federal Reserve’s response has broken almost all economic and financial charts, rules and precedents and maybe this is just another example of this and the word “unprecedented” has very little power any more.
Last week was particularly notable for improved participation rates with recently-lagging Mid and Small Cap stocks handsomely outperforming their Large Cap cousins.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week is a huge one on the economic data and policy fronts. Investors will contend with major inflation data and central bank meetings.
The Federal Reserve's monetary policy committee will announce its latest interest rate decision on Wednesday afternoon. Markets are overwhelmingly pricing in no change. The European Central Bank is widely expected to raise its target interest rate by a quarter of a point on Thursday.
Before that Fed decision, we will get the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for May and the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers. The consensus estimates are for increases of 4.2% and 1.5%, respectively.
Other economic data out next week includes Retail Sales data for May and the latest Consumer Sentiment Index.
Q1 2023 earnings reports will come from Oracle, Adobe, Kroger and Lennar. Home Depot will host an investor day.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.79%, one month ago: 6.35%, one year ago: 5.23%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 45% (29% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 31% (34% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 24% (37% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↑Bullish by 21 (Bearish by 8 a week ago)
(Sentiment readings flipped from majority bearish to majority bullish last week)
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
FEAR & GREED INDEX ..
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business is a way to gauge whether stocks are fairly priced or not. It is a compilation of seven different indicators that measure some aspect of stock market behavior. They are market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call options, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
The index can be used as an attempt to determine the mood of the market. Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment. Extreme Greed readings can be associated with a sense of “FOMO” and investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment, possibly leaving the market vulnerable to a sharp downward correction at some point. It is important to note that either of these extreme conditions may persist for considerable periods of time.
Data courtesy of CNN Business.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. most shorter term interest rates are higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.42%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (3.73%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week fell from 0.81% to 0.79%, indicating an overall flattening of the inversion of the curve during the last five days.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 21%, one month ago: 0%)
(one week ago: 36%, one month ago: 1%)
(one week ago: 43%, one month ago: 99%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on June 14th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 28%, one month ago: 21%)
(one week ago: 72%, one month ago: 79%)
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 0%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 2.7% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Pepsico) for the third week in a row - down 0.7% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 158 and rose by 9 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 137 and fell by 16 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 67. SPY ended the week 10.0% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 70. QQQ ended the week 12.2% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically over-bought, RSI below 30: technically over-sold
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Is right now the absolute worst time ever to buy a house? Ben Carlson runs some numbers.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
Before securities—like stocks, bonds, and notes—can be offered for sale to the public, they first must be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Any stock that does not have an effective registration statement on file with the SEC is considered to be unregistered.
To sell or attempt to sell a financial security before it is registered is considered a felony.
However, certain exemptions apply. For example, a privately-owned corporation may issue shares of stock to its executives and board members. However, the new stockholders must notify the SEC before selling the stock to anyone else.
In addition, companies can raise capital by soliciting investments from individuals outside the company who are considered to be "qualified investors." The SEC defines a qualified investor as someone who has a net worth of at least one million dollars or an annual income in excess of $200,000.
Individuals who meet "qualified investor" status can sometimes become victims of unregistered securities scams that are advertised as "private offerings." In April 2019, Investment News published an article called "Sales of Unregistered Securities Are a Growing Problem That's Harming Every Investor—and the Industry."5
Bruce Kelly of Investment News uses the example of Castleberry Financial Services Group. The company managed to raise $3.6 million from investors by offering what they called an "alternative investment fund" that promised up to a 12.2% annual yield.
However, an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) revealed that some of the money they'd raised had been used to pay the personal expenses of the firm's principals. Funds were also transferred to family members and other businesses that the principals controlled. The SEC eventually took the company to court and shut them down.
However, Kelly points out that this kind of scheme—where private, unregistered securities are sold to wealthy investors and institutions—is not unusual and is, in fact, actually rampant in the industry:
What’s growing alongside this legitimate, if risky, market is a seedy side of the financial industry. Investment funds promising above-market returns that employ networks of brokers, former brokers, insurance agents or others lurking on the fringes of the industry to sell their investments are taking advantage of unsuspecting investors.
The marketplace for unregistered securities has grown, partially because private securities can be sold over the internet and companies can solicit clients via social media. This results in unregistered, private securities being sold to investors who do not meet the SEC's criteria for "qualified investors." And according to Kelly, this is damaging the reputation of the financial advice industry.
The SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) are working on increasing oversight for finance professionals who sell private, unregistered securities.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Despite the best efforts of the whining Congressional arsonists on both sides, the Biden/McCarthy debt deal cruised comfortably through the House of Representatives and the Senate and straight to Biden’s desk for signature yesterday, bringing an end to the whole completely unnecessary psychodrama.
Markets had briefly begun repricing the risk of there still being some kind of US government default, even a self-inflicted very short one, but it soon became clear that, while the burn-it-all-down crew of politicians might soon try to exact some form of internal revenge on their own “ideological traitors” who agreed to these compromises, their rather pathetic opposition to the successful passage of the deal was ultimately entirely impotent.
It’s important to realize that, yes, the market did briefly get a bit jittery but it never really priced in the worst-case debt ceiling scenario. Bringing the whole sorry episode to an end has merely removed a potential catastrophic negative and does not actually add anything new and positive into the macro set up.
What it does do is to now allow the focus of investors (not to mention that of the authors of weekly financial market reports) to return to proper concerns such as employment, whether the Fed hikes interest rates on June 14th and most important, the whole hard landing (inflation conquered at the cost of a meaningful recession) vs. soft landing (no recession or a very shallow one) thing.
Starting with employment; earlier last week, it had been announced that the number of unfilled job vacancies had surprisingly risen from 9.7 million in March to 10.1 million in April (forecasts had been for a decline to 9.4 million). That translated to 1.8 open jobs per unemployed worker in April.
Then on Friday we learned that the US economy created an astonishing 339k jobs in May, instead of the expected number of well below 200k. That is the 14th straight month that payroll numbers have beaten estimates. Plus the large April gains were revised even higher.
The unemployment rate, however, shifted higher, to 3.7%, up from 3.4%, reflecting an increase in the number of people who became unemployed in the last 30 days. Hourly wages only rose slightly, implying an increasingly under-control situation in this area.
Faced with these mixed signals, the stock market went with the recent path of least resistance and moved nicely higher on Friday in what was a rare across-the-board pop that saw most of the “soldiers” move forward into battle and not just the ”generals” as has been the case recently.
Moving on to the expectations for the Fed’s next interest rate announcement in less than two weeks’ time; there’s “no compelling reason” to pause rate hikes at the next Fed meeting, Cleveland Fed chief Loretta Mester said early in the week. The very-important-right-now futures market probability of such a pause at the next meeting swiftly declined as a result but then swung violently back the other way after multiple other Fed speakers like Governor Philip Jefferson, a centrist who often echoes Chair Jerome Powell’s views, proceeded to hint heavily that the Fed would indeed likely “skip” a June rate hike, but added that the rate-lifting cycle was likely not yet over.
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia President Patrick Harker, a voting member of the committee that decides interest rate policy, even came right out and said it; “We should at least skip this meeting”.
The probability of no change in rates on June 14th ended the week at 72%, way more than double its reading of just a week ago (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below). Inflation numbers ahead will likely solidify the Fed's next move.
In late February and early March, stocks were getting pounded because the February jobs report was a blowout and markets priced in more Fed rate hikes. The “terminal rate” expectations got as high as 5.625% and stocks dropped hard, as they should have. Then, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank failed, soon to be followed by First Republic. Investors priced in a banking crisis and increased chances of recession/hard landing. Turns out neither of those things has happened - at least not yet. Meanwhile, economic data remains really, really resilient and Q1 2023 earnings fell by an awful lot less than had been feared by almost everyone.
Combine that with recent AI euphoria (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) and, by virtue of the “pain trade” I outlined in my April 23rd report, you now have a NASDAQ that has ripped higher for six weeks in a row and an S&P 500 that is only a fraction away from being up 20% from its lows of October 2022, which would technically turn it from a bear market to a bull market by the accepted definition.
As regular readers will be bored of hearing from me by now, I will caveat the fact that headline indexes are strengthening by pointing out that the price of the average stock in the S&P 500 is actually negative for 2023 (vs. the index which is up close to 10%) and that the vast majority of the index’s gain comes from five or six stocks out of the 500. But nevertheless, a scenario whereby the other 495 or so stocks start to play catchup could be very interesting.
There are still many troublesome technical analysis concerns and worrying negative divergences which I continue to outline weekly in UNDER THE HOOD (below) and I am nowhere near calling the death of the bear, but you cannot help but be impressed with the stock market’s recent resilience right now.
OTHER NEWS ..
Grandmothers are the invisible glue .. Grandparents don’t get a lot of air time in the conversation about America’s child-care crisis. Yet some 42% of parents rely on their own parents to help care for children, a figure that is eerily close to the 40% of families that say they don’t have the child care they need.
Grandparents are critical to holding America’s creaking child-care system together, as reported by Bloomberg last week. They are often the first call when the regular day-care plan falls through, but the consequence is that many older women leave the workforce earlier than they’d like, putting their own financial security at risk. Working grandparents, like parents, would benefit from affordable and reliable child care, universal pre-school and paid parental leave.
About half of grandmothers are employed — some because they find work fulfilling, and many because they need the income. Many are also helping their adult children with expenses, including for the grandkids. That means many grandmothers are juggling caregiving with paid work, just as their daughters are. And some are leaving the workforce earlier than they would like to because of those caregiving responsibilities. Although workforce participation among women aged 25-54 just hit a new high again, women over 55 have not yet recovered from their pandemic-induced job losses.
The end of The Great Resignation ..Workers furiously quitting for new, likely higher-paying jobs is a thing of the past, it seems. The historic surge of quitters was a symptom of an on-fire labor market, where demand for workers far outstripped supply. But the quits rate fell to just 2.4% in April, according to last week’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) and puts us roughly back in line with the average rate of 2019. Even leisure and hospitality workers, once the poster children for the resignation boom, are seeing their quits rate return to pre-pandemic norms and well down from the peak last summer.
Accompanying this narrative is foot-traffic and rent data showing that the pandemic has shifted urban centers of gravity in major cities like New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, with residents no longer fleeing the cities en masse but rather moving away from increasingly sterile office districts to the city neighborhoods with a greater abundance of apartments, bars and restaurants.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Very nearly half of all US stocks are now 20% or more below their one-year highs and are therefore considered to be in a bear market.
Read that again.
It should be clear to anyone that it is extremely hard for a broad market to move sustainably higher when the list of stocks falling into a bear market keeps getting longer and longer.
The price action of the high-valuation, mega-cap growth stocks is the likes of which we have not really seen since the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s and we all know how that ended. To that point, only the Technology and Communication Services sectors are trending higher relative to the benchmark index right now. Those dynamics are also not consistent with a shift to a sustainable, long-term bull market.
On the outside, the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ indexes look healthy, with rising trends even in the face of strong headwinds. However, there is disease beneath the visible skin. The problem is that we do not know how long the entire body can thrive before symptoms set in.
The path of least resistance is still higher for the stock indexes right now, technically speaking, but it is very much a “pain trade” as the 2023 rally is as hated as any in recent history, given rather underwhelming fundamentals. Many technicians are describing it as a “bull trap” within a long-term, still-intact bear market.
And between the inverted yield curve (see US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE below), the lack of any of the traditional signs of a lasting bear market bottom (such as mass capitulation by buyers) having occurred in October 2022 and the negative technical signals flashing all over the place, the risk of a material shift lower in stock prices must still be respected.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week will be rather quiet before both major inflation data and a Federal Reserve interest rate decision on the same day next week. There are, however, still a few earnings and economic data releases to look forward to.
Earnings will include results from everybody’s favorite POS stock, GameStop on Monday followed by DocuSign, Vail Resorts, Campbell Soup, Ciena, J.M. Smucker, NIO and Gitlab
The economic data highlights of the week will be the Durable Goods report for April and the Services Purchasing Managers’ index for May.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.57%, one month ago: 6.39%, one year ago: 5.09%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 29% (27% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 34% (33% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 37% (40% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 8 (Bearish by 13 a week ago)
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. most shorter term interest rates are higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.52%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (3.69%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week rose from 0.74% to 0.81%, indicating an overall steepening of the inversion of the curve during the last five days.
Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 21%, one month ago: 0%)
(one week ago: 39%, one month ago: 1%)
(one week ago: 40%, one month ago: 99%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on June 14th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 71%, one month ago: 16%)
(one week ago: 29%, one month ago: 77%)
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 7%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: Prologis, American Tower Corp) - up 2.9% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Pepsico) for the second week in a row - up 0.1% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 149 and rose by 11 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 153 and fell by 6 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 66. SPY ended the week 10.5% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a technically over-bought RSI of 76. QQQ ended the week 12.2% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically over-bought, RSI below 30: technically over-sold
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Here’s what it can look like when Americans retire abroad.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a type of artificial intelligence that can produce content such as audio, text, code, video, images, and other data. Whereas traditional AI algorithms may be used to identify patterns within a training data set and make predictions, generative AI uses machine learning algorithms to create outputs based on a training data set.
Generative AI can produce outputs in the same medium in which it is prompted (e.g., text-to-text) or in a different medium from the given prompt (e.g., text-to-image or image-to-video). Popular examples of generative AI include ChatGPT, Bard, DALL-E, Midjourney, and DeepMind.
Generative AI is a type of machine learning, which, at its core, works by training software models to make predictions based on data without the need for explicit programming.
Specifically, generative AI models are fed vast quantities of existing content to train the models to produce new content. They learn to identify underlying patterns in the data set based on a probability distribution and, when given a prompt, create similar patterns (or outputs based on these patterns).
Part of the umbrella category of machine learning called deep learning, generative AI uses a neural network that allows it to handle more complex patterns than traditional machine learning. Inspired by the human brain, neural networks do not necessarily require human supervision or intervention to distinguish differences or patterns in the training data.
Generative AI can be run on a variety of models, which use different mechanisms to train the AI and create outputs. These include generative adversarial networks (GANs), transformers, and Variational AutoEncoders (VAEs).
Widespread AI applications have already changed the way that users interact with the world; for example, voice-activated AI now comes pre-installed on many phones, speakers, and other everyday technology.
Similarly, users can interact with generative AI through different software interfaces. This has been one of the key innovations in opening up access and driving usage of generative AI to a wider audience. Whereas early versions of generative AI required technical or data science knowledge to interact with the software, AI developers are now designing user experiences in which prompts can be given and interactions can take place in plain language.
Here are some of the most popular recent examples of generative AI interfaces.
ChatGPT
Created by OpenAI, ChatGPT is an example of text-to-text generative AI: essentially, an AI-powered chatbot trained to interact with users via natural language dialogue. Users can ask ChatGPT questions, engage in back-and-forth conversation, and prompt it to compose text in different styles or genres, such as poems, essays, stories, or recipes, among others.
Released in November 2022, a free version of ChatGPT is available for use online. OpenAI also sells the application programming interface (API) for ChatGPT, among other enterprise subscription and embedding options.
DALL-E
DALL-E is an example of text-to-image generative AI that was released in January 2021 by OpenAI. It uses a neural network that was trained on images with accompanying text descriptions. Users can input descriptive text, and DALL-E will generate photorealistic imagery based on the prompt. It can also create variations on the generated image in different styles and from different perspectives.
DALL-E can also edit images, whether by making changes within an image (known in the software as Inpainting) or extending an image beyond its original proportions or boundaries (referred to as Outpainting).
Bard
Bard is a text-to-text generative AI interface based on Google’s large language model LaMDA (Language Model for Dialogue Applications). Like ChatGPT, Bard is a chatbot powered by AI technology that can answer questions or generate text based on user-given prompts. Google bills it as a “complementary experience to Google Search.”
In March 2023, Bard was released for public use in the United States and the United Kingdom, with plans to expand to more countries in more languages in the future. It made headlines in February 2023 after it shared incorrect information in a demo video, causing parent company Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL) shares to plummet around 9% in the days following the announcement.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Stocks skidded lower most of the week, giving back a lot of the previous week’s gains, as there was minimal reported progress towards a debt ceiling deal between the White House and Congressional Republicans. Talks seemed to collapse and restart over and over again with negotiators constantly talking out of both sides of their mouths so as to make absolutely nothing any of them said ever remotely believable.
We are now just days away from Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s newly-firmed up “X” date of June 5th, when the federal government is expected to “have insufficient resources to satisfy its obligations” which could result in the cancellation of social security payments, federal employees’ salaries and the repayment of national debt.
Also, any agreement will still need to go swiftly through the House and the Senate where it could be at the mercy of arsonists like Boebert, Taylor-Greene, Roy, Lee and (as ever) Rand Paul. Keep an eye on these particular lawmakers in the next week or so. Meanwhile, on the other end of the economic brainpower spectrum, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said on Friday that the political brinkmanship in Washington is in danger of creating an “entirely avoidable” systemic risk to the global economy and called for the ceiling to be raised "immediately”.
And the fact is that, even if there is some kind of resolution, the spending cuts requiredto get Republicans to an agreement may cost as many as 570k jobs (as reported by Bloomberg) and will likely of themselves push the country over the edge by crashing growth and sending the economy reeling into austerity at precisely the wrong time when it is on the brink of a potentially significant recession.
But the damaging fallout from all this nonsense has already started anyhow. DBRS Morningstar last week placed the AAA sovereign credit rating (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) on the United States “under review with negative implications.” Fitch Ratings said that it may downgrade its US sovereign credit rating by placing it on what it calls a Rating Watch Negative reflecting the worsening partisan s**t-show (my word, not theirs) that’s preventing a deal.
It’s about managing fear and jitters as much as anything else - the stock market even briefly reacted negatively to a report last week that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell might have been spotted near the Capitol building. The yield on the one-month US Treasury bill, which straddles the X-date and is currently acting as a “fear gauge” for default risk, is now at a record high of above 6% (see US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE below).
The market-generated probability that the Fed has now ended its campaign of rate hikes next month crashed from a near-certainty (83%) of a pause just a week ago to not even very likely by Friday (29%). And conviction that interest rates will be lower at the end of the year than they are now has collapsed from a literal 100% certainty just two weeks ago to only 40% by Friday (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below).
Sentiment rapidly reversed after the St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard said on Monday that he’s thinking there’ll be two more interest rate increases this year. As he loves to do from time to time, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari threw even more fuel onto the fire when he said that even if the US central bank were to pause next month, it should simultaneously signal that the hiking process is not over. In other words, no hike in June absolutely does not mean no hike in July.
Also playing into the higher rather than lower interest rate narrative is the latest Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation report released on Friday. The Fed’s preferred inflation measure rose 0.4% over the last month and is up 4.4% vs. a year ago, still more than double the Fed’s target rate.
Earnings from Lowe’s (LOW) echoed and reinforced concerns expressed recently by other major retailers, including Home Depot (HD), about the health of the American consumer. This did not help sentiment early in the week in a market already pre-disposed to heading lower in response to the shenanigans in DC.
On the other hand, blockbuster AI chip-driven earnings from Nvidia (NVDA) and Marvell Technology (MRVL) single-handedly salvaged some of the more ‘risk-on’ corners of the market on Thursday and Friday, at the end of what was otherwise a pretty dismal week for stocks all round. Unlike NFTs (remember them?) and some other types of crypto-adjacent rubbish, AI does appear to be a gold rush that may possibly be real and functional, rather than just some hollow hypes being bigged up by a few money-grubbing bros.
I am frequently asked why stocks are mostly holding up in the face of headwinds like an apparently imminent recession, big earnings declines and debt default? Well, the fact is that these bad things haven’t happened yet and that has caused stocks to lift and for the rally to be fueled by under-invested investment professionals who have been worried about all these things having to chase returns higher. Remember that everything in financial markets is relative to expectations and in 2023 the expectation has generally been, thanks to the historic rate hikes of 2022 and persistent inversion of the yield curve for the best part of a year now, that there will be a significant and potentially damaging recession any minute now.
However, it’s important to remember that “not yet as bad as feared” is still not “good”. Slowing economic growth and falling earnings are still not a positive, even if they are diminishing at a slower pace than many worried they would, and - as I have said before - this leaves the stock market very vulnerable to any downside surprises or disappointments that may emerge going forward.
What we need are actual positive resolutions from the issues that overhang the markets, i.e., a clear soft landing, earnings stability (which keeps valuations reasonable), a sensible debt ceiling deal very soon and confirmation from the Federal Reserve that rate cuts are coming sooner rather than later (the long sought-after pivot). Give us all those and then maybe we can start thinking about a real and sustainable market turnaround.
Absent that, short and medium term caution is still warranted.
OTHER NEWS ..
Feeling poorer .. 35% of Americans said their financial situation was now worse than it was a year ago, according to the annual Fed survey of American households that assesses their economic well-being. This is the largest share on record since the Fed began asking the question almost a decade ago.
The least-educated consumers were the most likely group to say they were worse off: 40% reported as much in 2022, up from 33% in 2021 and just 18% in 2019. But there was also a historic jump in higher-educated respondents who said the same; 31% reported being financially worse off, a huge surge from just 13% in 2021.
Last year saw an important shift in the pandemic-era economy, with the expiry of stimulus checks, expanded unemployment benefits and more. Also Investment portfolios shrank as stock and bond markets simultaneously declined in 2022, something that hardly ever happens.
It seems, however, that soaring costs are the biggest factor at play here. Inflation was the top financial challenge cited among people of all income levels in 2022, which suggests "a widespread effect of higher prices across the population," as the Fed writes in the report.
Reality hits home at FRB .. First Republic Bank (FRB) made its name catering to wealthy clients across California and New York, reeling in many of them with unusually sweet mortgages. The system made its employees rich. The San Francisco-based bank, which regulators seized and sold to JPMorgan Chase (JPM) early this month, is said to have been paying dozens of employees annual salaries of more than $10 million apiece before its collapse. One of them was even making more than JPM CEO Jamie Dimon. But those days are over it seems: the bank’s new boss last week informed a thousand FRB employees that they are now out of a job.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The two headline indexes, the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ, are handily higher so far in 2023. Yet the average stock is down for the year so far. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is down for the year so far. Eight of the eleven sectors are down for the year so far. Why is that? Because this market is very narrow and getting even narrower. And that is generally not healthy.
We saw a great example of this on Thursday when just two stocks, Nvidia (NVDA) and Microsoft (MSFT), were responsible for over 80% of the robust gain of the entire S&P 500 index that day.
As a senior Wall Street analyst said last week; “This is what bear markets do. They’re designed to fool you, confuse you, make you do things you don’t want to do, chase things at the wrong time”.
The S&P 500 is in a pattern of higher highs and lower lows so far in the month of May. That dynamic is historically consistent with investor indecision and low conviction increasing the technical likelihood of an imminent sharp pullback.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
US stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday for Memorial Day. Tuesday kicks off a week of some remaining Q1 2023 earnings reports and important job-market data.
Earnings highlights will include results from Hewlett Packard, Dell, Salesforce, Broadcom, Dollar General, Advance Auto Parts, Lululemon and Chewy.
On Wednesday, we will see the results of the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS). Expectations are for a slight decline to 9.44 million job openings.
The big one, however, is the Jobs Report on Friday before the market opens. It is expected to report a gain of 200k payrolls in May, after a 253k increase in April. The unemployment rate is expected to tick back up to 3.5%.
Other economic data to watch next week includes the Consumer Confidence index and the Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ index.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.39%, one month ago: 6.43%, one year ago: 5.10%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 27% (23% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 33% (37% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 40% (40% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 13 (Bearish by 17 a week ago)
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. most shorter term interest rates are higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (6.02%) being paid currently for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (3.80%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week rose sharply from 0.58% to 0.74%, indicating an overall steepening of the inversion of the curve during the last five days.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread. Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 1%, one month ago: 0%)
(one week ago: 8%, one month ago: 0%)
(one week ago: 91%, one month ago: 100%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on June 14th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 17%, one month ago: 14%)
(one week ago: 83%, one month ago: 64%)
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 22%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) for the second week in a row - up 4.7% for the week.
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Pepsico) - down 3.2% for the week.
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 138 and rose by 2 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 159 and fell by 2 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 60. SPY ended the week 12.1% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a technically over-bought RSI of 74. QQQ ended the week 13.8% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically over-bought, RSI below 30: technically over-sold
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
There are times in nature when 2 + 2 = 10. When two little things combine to form one huge thing. This same thing can often happen with personality traits which affect how you approach investing - and not always with good results. Are you any of these?
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
SOVEREIGN CREDIT RATING
A sovereign credit rating is an independent assessment of the creditworthiness of a country or sovereign entity. Sovereign credit ratings can give investors insights into the level of risk associated with investing in the debt of a particular country, including any political risk.
At the request of the country, a credit rating agency will evaluate its economic and political environment to assign it a rating. Obtaining a good sovereign credit rating is usually essential for developing countries that want access to funding in international bond markets.
In addition to issuing bonds in external debt markets, another common motivation for countries to obtain a sovereign credit rating is to attract foreign direct investment (FDI). Many countries seek ratings from the largest and most prominent credit rating agencies to encourage investor confidence. Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch Ratings are the three most influential agencies.
Other well-known credit rating agencies include China Chengxin International Credit Rating Company, Dagong Global Credit Rating, DBRS, and Japan Credit Rating Agency (JCR). Subdivisions of countries sometimes issue their own sovereign bonds, which also require ratings. However, many agencies exclude smaller areas, such as a country's regions, provinces, or municipalities.
Investors use sovereign credit ratings as a way to assess the riskiness of a particular country's bonds.
Sovereign credit risk, which is reflected in sovereign credit ratings, represents the likelihood that a government might be unable—or unwilling—to meet its debt obligations in the future. Several key factors come into play in deciding how risky it might be to invest in a particular country or region. They include its debt service ratio, growth in its domestic money supply, its import ratio, and the variance of its export revenue.
Many countries faced growing sovereign credit risk after the 2008 financial crisis, stirring global discussions about having to bail out entire nations. At the same time, some countries accused the credit rating agencies of being too quick to downgrade their debt. The agencies were also criticized for following an "issuer pays" model, in which nations pay the agencies to rate them. These potential conflicts of interest would not occur if investors paid for the ratings.
Examples of Sovereign Credit Ratings:
Standard & Poor's gives a BBB- or higher rating to countries it considers investment grade, and grades of BB+ or lower are deemed to be speculative or "junk" grade. S&P gave Argentina a CCC- grade in 2019, while Chile maintained an A+ rating. Fitch has a similar system.
Moody’s considers a Baa3 or higher rating to be of investment grade, and a rating of Ba1 and below is speculative. Greece received a B1 rating from Moody's in 2019, while Italy had a rating of Baa3. In addition to their letter-grade ratings, all three of these agencies also provide a one-word assessment of each country's current economic outlook: positive, negative, or stable.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The S&P 500 is at exactly the same level it was at two years ago. That’s a lot of angst and stress expended for no net change in 24 months. As if to emphasize the point, the stock market spent large portions of last week just churning sideways on very low volume as traders monitored the reported progress in debt ceiling negotiations. These dreary spells were occasionally punctuated by bursts of activity as i) carefully-managed clues were tactically released about how the debt ceiling negotiations might be going and ii) Fed officials suddenly got very talkative again.
There are now just ten days left until Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen's June 1st deadline for when the government runs out of cash. Investors are pricing in higher risk to anything maturing within a short time of that projected date, which is why the one-month US T-Bill has become the preferred barometerfor sentiment towards the debt negotiations. The higher the yield, the more concern there is (see US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE below for the latest reading).
Perhaps an anonymous White House staffer put it best when they apparently said that passing the debt ceiling increase is like passing a kidney stone. We all know it will pass, it’s just a question of how difficult it will be.
Investors held their collective breath amid the latest pile of nonsense coming out of Washington DC on Monday, which saw the lowest daily trading volume of the year so far on the New York Stock Exchange. Things ratcheted up a little on Tuesday when McCarthy bizarrely bleated that the two sides were somehow simultaneously miles apart and yet maybe really close to a deal that might be just around the corner. Biden pulled a classic drama-queen PR stunt, saying he will cut short a very important Asian trip to come back early to ride to the rescue. Later in the week, the spin went into overdrive with suddenly optimistic bulletins being pushed out from both sides, each desperately trying to look like the good guy.
But then, on Friday, under increasing pressure from their own “burn-it-all-down” members to break off talks, the Republican delegation surprised precisely nobody by staging a hissy fit, flouncing out of the negotiation meeting and declaring the talks paused. The stock market eye-rolled, sighed and gave back the day’s gains.
Smoke and mirrors. I suggest not believing a single thing you hear from either side until a deal is officially done or once the nation is in a death spiral, whichever option it is these clowns choose for us.
Since 1960, Congress has acted 78 separate times to permanently raise, temporarily extend or revise the definition of the debt limit – 49 times under Republican presidents and 29 times under Democratic presidents. It’s obviously got a load of precedent and it’s not hard to do. Just do it FFS! We need to move on to address other much more important stuff, not get wrapped up in completely unnecessary self-inflicted wounds.
Generally hawkish commentary from multiple Fed officials reminding us that the battle against inflation is still far from won means that it may now be a much closer call than we first thought whether the Fed committee continues raising rates or pauses at the next meeting in June. Markets at one point even indicated a one in three probability of a hike, up from just 12% only a week ago - before falling back again on Friday after the debt talks collapsed.
The price of shares in Home Depot (HD) fell hard on Tuesday after the biggest US home retailer reported a more than 4% drop in year-on-year revenue, missing expectations by the biggest margin in 20 years and gave pretty depressing forward guidance. More generally, however, Retail Sales on a national level (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) increased in April, although the headline number was slightly lower than expected. The core number that excludes auto and gas sales was encouraging, however, with the best showing put in by online stores and restaurants and bars. This all suggests that consumer spending is broadly holding up in the face of continued economic difficulties including inflation and high borrowing costs.
When you aggregate and analyze the appropriate data, you definitely see that the odds of a soft landing (inflation eventually conquered with no recession or, at worst, a mild one) still remain higher than those of a hard landing. To be clear, this analysis does not mean a hard landing won’t happen. But so far, it is not happening. Yes, the economy is clearly slowing, but not at the pace that we’d consider yet puts us in hard landing territory.
I will, of course be keeping an eye on (and sharing with you) how these odds develop over time and there has been a recent spike in weekly jobless claims that bears watching, but at this point it’s the softies who seem in a better position than the hard-men. This is helping support stock prices, indeed the S&P 500 hit new 2023 highs at one point last week and the NASDAQ even reached its highest level in over a year.
Q1 2023 earnings season is almost over. The overwhelming expectation was that S&P 500 company earnings would fall close to 7% last quarter from the previous one. The fact is they have only fallen about 2%. As Bank of America put it last week, “it is dangerous to underestimate Corporate America's margin preservation skills.”
Stock markets are priced for a pause, a quick pivot and then multiple rate cuts by early next year. Anything less could well be a problem. The concentration of this year’s gains in a small number of big tech names (see UNDER THE HOOD below) makes the S&P 500 vulnerable to a selloff if they start to lose value, even if everything else rallies higher.
Indeed the massive irony is that if investors start to put money to work in other sectors, pivoting away from focusing just on those monster names, a buying spree could even be the catalyst for something of a sell-off at the index level.
OTHER NEWS ..
Indebted .. Consumer debt hit a fresh high in Q1 2023, pushing past $17 trillion for the first time ever, according to a report from the New York Federal Reserve.
Households added $148 billion in overall debt in the quarter. Balances are now $2.9 trillion higher than just before the pandemic. Consumers typically build up more credit card debt at the end of the year during the holiday season and then reduce those balances at the start of the year. However, for the first time in 20 years, that wasn’t the case, suggesting some households are under strain from higher prices and may be relying on credit cards to maintain spending.
The overall delinquency rate remained relatively low by historical levels at 2.6%, but the amount of debt that became delinquent is rising in most loan categories, including credit card and auto debt.
Not going back .. When average city office-occupancy rates at the start of the year surpassed 50% again for the first time since the pandemic, many landlords viewed this as a sign that employees were finally resuming their former work habits and would soon be flooding back into offices all over the country.
However, the Wall Street Journal last week reported that those office-usage rates have not budged since then, with most companies now settling into a hybrid work strategy that shows little sign of fading. About 58% of companies allow employees to work a portion of their week from home. In fact, the number of companies that actually require employees to be in the office full-time is now declining again, down to 42% from 49% just three months ago.
With employees at companies with hybrid strategies spending an average of only half the five-day work-week in the office, it isn’t surprising that these office-return rates have stalled out at around half the pre-pandemic levels. The rise in employees working from home has driven some retailers and restaurants out of business and forced owners of office buildings to either reduce rents or to just get out of the commercial real estate business by selling their properties.
US commercial real estate prices fell in Q1 2023 for the first time in more than a decade. While the decline was less than 1%, Moody’s chief economist expects prices to drop about 10% overall, and potentially further in the case of a confirmed US recession.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Sticking with the theme of smoke and mirrors, on Tuesday of last week Lowry’s Buying Power dipped below the level last seen at the October 2022 stock market low. A commonly-held optimistic narrative is that this was the bottom and a new bull market began at that time, but the level of Demand last week was weaker than it was at the supposed end of the preceding 10-month bear market. This just makes no sense from a technical perspective. Why has Demand now fallen back to new depths a full seven months after a “market bottom” with the indexes now much higher?
The Percent of Stocks Above Their 30 Week Moving Averages held a very robust reading of over 83% on February 2nd. Since then, that reading has been cut in half, while the S&P 500 Index closed last week higher than it was then. This negative divergence clearly shows the poor condition of market breadth.
As mentioned earlier in this report, the NASDAQ index hit a one year high on Thursday - but there were also more one year lows registered last week than one year highs.
The technical evidence is crystal clear .. the heavy lifting is being carried out by fewer and fewer stocks.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Inflation data, Federal Reserve meeting minutes, and late-in-the-season Q1 earnings from some retailers and chip makers are the highlights on this week's calendar.
Earnings will be released by Zoom Video, Costco, Dollar Tree, Best Buy, Lowe’s, Autozone, Marvell Technology, Analog Devices and Snowflake. JPMorgan Chase and Ford Motor will host investor days.
On Wednesday, the minutes from the Fed’s last rate-setting meeting will be published. They will be combed through for deeper insight as to how committee members are thinking.
The Fed's preferred inflation measure, the latest Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index comes out on Friday. It’s mostly based on this data that committee members make their inflation assumptions which then lead to their interest rate decisions.The forecast is that it will fall to 4.4% year-on-year. That same day, the April Durable Goods number will also come out.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.35%, one month ago: 6.27%, one year ago: 5.25%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 23% (29% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 37% (29% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 40% (42% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 17 (Bearish by 13 a week ago)
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. most shorter term interest rates are higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.62%) being paid currently for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (3.70%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week rose from 0.52% to 0.58%, indicating an overall steepening of the inverted curve over the last five days.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2 year vs. 10 year spread. Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 2%)
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 12%)
(one week ago: 100%, one month ago: 86%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on June 14th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 12%, one month ago: 30%)
(one week ago: 88%, one month ago: 59%)
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 11%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - up 4.3% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 4.3% for the week
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 136 and rose by 4 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 161 and fell by 4 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 61. SPY ended the week 12.4% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a technically over-bought RSI of 71. QQQ ended the week 16.7% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of expected upcoming stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 0.2 points lower at 16.8. It remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and below its long term trend line.
** RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically over-bought, RSI below 30: technically over-sold
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Are you a loner, a follower or a zombie?
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
RETAIL SALES
The term "retail sales" refers to an economic metric that tracks consumer demand for finished goods. This figure is a very important data set as it is a key monthly market-moving event. Retail sales are reported each month by the U.S. Census Bureau and indicate the direction of the economy. It acts as a key economic barometer and whether inflationary pressures exist. Retail sales are measured by durable and non-durable goods purchased over a defined period of time. Sales for the report are derived from 13 types of retailers from food service to retail stores.
Retail sales are a good indicator of the pulse of the economy and its projected path toward expansion or contraction. Retail sales figures are reported by all food service and retail stores and compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau. The measurement is typically based on data sampling and is used to model the patterns for the entire country.
As a leading macroeconomic indicator, healthy retail sales figures typically elicit positive movements in equity markets. Higher sales are good news for shareholders of retail companies because it means higher earnings. Bondholders, on the other hand, are quite ambivalent towards this metric. A booming economy is good for all, but lower retail sales figures and a contracting economy would translate to a decrease in inflation. This may cause investors to gravitate toward bonds, eventually leading to higher bond prices.
Retail sales capture in-store sales, as well as catalog and other out-of-store sales of both durable (last for more than three years) and non-durable goods (those with a three-year or shorter life span).
These are broken down into a number of different categories including (but not limited to):
Clothing & clothing accessories stores
Pharmacies & drug stores
Food & beverage stores
Electronics and appliance stores
Furniture stores
Gasoline stations
New car dealers
As a broad economic indicator, the retail sales report is one of the timeliest reports because it provides data that is only a few weeks old. Individual retail companies often provide their own sales figures at the same time every month, and their stocks can experience volatility as investors process the data.
Major changes in price can affect retail sales figures. These fluctuations in prices are seen primarily in two retail sales categories: food retailers and gas stations. Large increases in food and energy prices can cause sales figures to drop in both categories, thus affecting the sales of a particular month.
The retail sales figures are compiled monthly by the Census Bureau, which is part of the U.S. Department of Commerce. They are released in the middle of the month and cover the previous month's sales.
Retail sales is an important indicator that signals either the contraction or expansion of an economy. An increase in retail sales signals a healthy economy that is expanding while a decrease in retail sales signals the opposite. An increase in retail sales usually moves stocks upward and is good for shareholders.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Attention on Wall Street is shifting away from guessing future interest rates to the distinct possibility of an economic downturn. And that is encouraging investors to reward the strong and punish the weak. This is causing increasing divergences between the performance of different stocks within the same index or even the same sector.
Winners offsetting losers is giving the impression of a quiet market not really going anywhere when you look down on it from an index level, but there is a lot going on under the surface.
We are also seeing bonds finally beginning to return to their historically traditional role as having a low or even sometimes reverse correlation with stocks. This was very not the case in 2022 which is why it was such a uniquely disastrous year for portfolios with diversified stock/bond allocations as everything took a dive at the same time which almost never happens for any extended period.
House Republicans and the White House are on a high-speed debt ceiling collision course with each side betting the other will blink before impact. Both camps seem to be counting on a portfolio-busting investor meltdown to do their dirty work for them when they eventually reach a face-saving compromise in the 59th minute of the eleventh hour to dodge a default. That way, they can turn around to their respective bases and say that, although they did their very best to screw over the other side, those pesky financial markets forced their hands and that, in the end, they took a decision that was in the best interests of the country. So icky.
Meantime, the picture will likely emerge on the world stage of the United States as a largely dysfunctional quasi-banana republic shooting itself in the foot and no longer worthy of a position of a leader and steward of global markets and the worldwide economy. Lots of wry smiles in Beijing, I’m thinking.
During a week in which you’d think his attention ought to be elsewhere, potential presidential candidate Donald Trump still managed to find time to hop aboard the default express, embracing the willingness (some might say eagerness) of many House Republicans to risk a US debt default as a weapon to extract political concessions.
Speaker Kevin McCarthy also doubled down on the strategy last week, saying after a breakdown of talks with the President that the consensus among Republicans is to “keep the pressure on POTUS”. This stance is not impressing JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon who, along with his Goldman Sachs counterpart, preached to the choir and sent a letter to US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen calling for an urgent and immediate increase to the debt limit.
The whole Congressional dance of death is starting to affect consumer sentiment, as represented by the latest monthly Index of Consumer Sentiment released last week, which is quickly turning sour as Americans become significantly more concerned about the health of the economy and what is looming on the horizon.
Consumer prices rose less than expected on an annual basis in April, raising optimism that stubbornly high inflation is beginning to moderate. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation was up 4.9% year-over-year, down from 5.0% in March and below economists’ forecasts. That was the lowest level for the CPI in two years. The monthly gain of 0.4% was in line with expectations. It was the 10th-straight month of lower annualized inflation, from a peak of above 9% last summer.
The CPI numbers were confirmed by the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation affecting manufacturers which was released the next day, and was pretty much in line with expectations, showing its lowest reading since January 2021.
While inflation is inching towards the Federal Reserve's 2% target, it may be a while before we get there. New York Fed President John Williams said this week that it could take as long as two years before we see inflation back where the Fed needs it to be.
Nevertheless, the two inflation reports seem to have done little to change the market’s view that the Fed will leave interest rates unchanged next month (still hovering around a 90% probability) and it’s unanimous; quite literally 100% of futures market participants believe that the Fed will have been forced to cut rates by the end of the year (see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below) even though the Fed insists that it won’t do such a thing.
Regional bank instability continued as PacWest (PACW) announced that it had lost 10% of its deposits in just a two-day period and the stock promptly fell 22% in the blink of an eye. To be clear, don’t listen to the clueless 2008 truthers on Fintok - the problem is not an insolvency one this time where the public will necessarily lose their deposits, it’s a macro-economic one resulting from a likely widespread reduction in bank capital being made available for businesses (credit contraction, as it is known on Wall Street) because of inevitably increased regulatory and FDIC insurance costs.
The likely Fed pause, better-than-feared Q1 2023 earnings and most of the May economic data so far have all been kind of okay and generally a somewhat muted net positive for stocks. But most of these factors are also already priced in and none of the major issues that could cause a sharp market decline (a nasty recession, inflation stickiness, more regional bank issues, debt ceiling chaos etc.) have yet been eliminated.
In other words, all that’s happening is that already-existing expectations are being mostly met and validated. It’ll take a substantial improvement in multiple market influences to push stocks meaningfully higher from here. Meanwhile the risk to the downside brought about by any kind of disappointment remains elevated.
OTHER NEWS ..
We’re happier, especially the guys .. The Wall Street Journal reported last week that job satisfaction among Americans hit a 36-year high in 2022, reflecting two effects of the tight pandemic labor market: the quality of jobs improved as wages and work flexibility increased and workers moved into positions that were a better fit.
Last year, over 62% of U.S. workers said they were satisfied with their jobs, according to new data from the Conference Board, up from 60% in 2021 and 57% in 2020. The business-research organization polled workers on 26 aspects of work and found that people were most content with their commutes, their co-workers, the physical environment of their workplace and job security.
Among the happiest workers: people who voluntarily switched jobs during the pandemic and individuals working in hybrid roles with a mix of in-person and remote work. Men’s satisfaction was higher than women’s in every component, especially in areas such as leave policies, bonus plans, promotions, communication and organizational culture.
Icahn follow up .. In last weekend’s report, I mentioned Hindenberg Research’s report targeting Icahn Enterprises (IEP). Indeed, the research firm has since doubled down on its IEP accusations with even more criticisms of the company and its larger-than-life founder Carl Icahn. Maybe someone over at the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York read their copy of Angles last Sunday as it contacted IEP last week asking for information about the value of its assets, corporate governance, dividends and other topics. IEP said in a filing that it is cooperating with the investigation and doesn’t believe it will have a significant impact on the firm.
Hmmm, I’m not so sure about that, Carl - the firm’s share price straight away dropped by 15% when news of the probe broke and ended the week over 76% below its all-time high.
Biking to oblivion? .. Shares of Peloton Interactive (PTON), priced above $167 as recently as 2021, closed last week below $7 after being told to recall over two million exercise bikes following reports of injuries caused by seats breaking during use, the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) said on Thursday. The recall piles more pressure on PTON as the company has already been dealing with massively waning demand for its high-end fitness equipment amid an uncertain economy.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Consider that Apple (AAPL) and Microsoft (MSFT), the top two of the 500 companies in the market capitalization-weighted S&P 500, have a 10% weighting in the index while representing just 0.4% of the component stocks.
The biggest five - Apple, Microsoft, Amazon (AMZN), Nvidia (NVDA) and Alphabet/Google (GOOGL) - while representing only 1% of the number of component stocks in the index, now carry more than a 20% weighting in the performance of the index as a whole and these stocks are moving in an entirely different direction than the greater universe of sliding Mid Cap and Small Cap stocks (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK).
Therefore, it should be of no surprise that while the S&P 500 recently traded close to its own February high, huge parts of the market have been in meaningful decline since the end of January. The same is true for the NASDAQ Composite Index, where AAPL and MSFT alone weigh in at a combined 22% of the index. And if these monster names begin to falter as a result of profit-taking in a general downturn or even any kind of idiosyncratic problems, that will be bad news bears for the indexes.
Things can change, of course, but right now the vast majority of technical evidence is pointing to a rapidly fading bear market rally rather than to a new bull market.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Q1 2023 earnings season continues this week with retailers taking center stage. Highlights will be Home Depot, Walmart, Target, Alibaba, TJX, Ross Stores, Cisco, Applied Materials, Deere and Take-Two Interactive.
The highlight of a relatively light week of economic data will be Retail Sales which is forecast to rise 0.7% from a month earlier, versus a decline of 0.6% last time out.
We’ll also get the Leading Economic Index and several housing indicators including the Housing Market Index, New Residential Construction and Existing Home Sales data.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.39%, one month ago: 6.27%, one year ago: 5.30%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 29% (24% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 29% (31% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 42% (45% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 13 (Bearish by 21 a week ago)
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. most shorter term interest rates are higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.79%) being paid currently for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (3.45%) for the 7-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week rose from 0.48% to 0.52%, indicating an overall steepening of the curve over the last five days.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2-year vs. the 10-year spread. Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
Where will interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) be at the end of 2023?
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 0%)
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 1%)
(one week ago: 100%, one month ago: 99%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on June 14th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 6%)
(one week ago: 93%, one month ago: 67%)
(one week ago: 7%, one month ago: 27%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 2.4% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) for the second week in a row - down 2.2% for the week
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 132 and fell by 7 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 165 and rose by 4 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 53. SPY ended the week 13.8% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line with a RSI of 60. QQQ ended the week 19.6% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of expected upcoming stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 0.2 points lower at 17.0. It remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and below its long term trend line.
** RSI (Relative Strength Index) above 70: technically over-bought, RSI below 30: technically over-sold
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Stocks for the short term? Nooooooo!
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
MARKET CAPITALIZATION
Market capitalization (market cap) refers to the total dollar market value of a company's outstanding shares of stock. The investment community uses this figure to determine a company's size instead of sales or total asset figures. In an acquisition, the market cap is used to determine whether a takeover candidate represents a good value or not to the acquirer.
Understanding what a company is worth is an important task and often difficult to quickly and accurately ascertain. Market capitalization is a quick and easy method for estimating a company's value by extrapolating what the market thinks it is worth for publicly traded companies. In such a case, simply multiply the share price by the number of available shares.
After a company goes public and starts trading on the exchange, its price is determined by supply and demand for its shares in the market. If there is a high demand for its shares due to favorable factors, the price would increase. If the company's future growth potential doesn't look good, sellers of the stock could drive down its price. The market cap then becomes a real-time estimate of the company's value.
The formula for market capitalization is:
Market Cap = Current Share Price * Total Number of Shares Outstanding
For example, a company with 20 million shares selling at $100 a share would have a market cap of $2 billion. A second company with a share price of $1,000 but only 10,000 shares outstanding, on the other hand, would only have a market cap of $10 million.
A company's market cap is first established via an initial public offering (IPO). Before an IPO, the company that wishes to go public enlists an investment bank to employ valuation techniques to derive a company's value and to determine how many shares will be offered to the public and at what price.
For example, a company whose IPO value is set at $100 million by its investment bank may decide to issue 10 million shares at $10 per share or they may equivalently want to issue 20 million at $5 a share. In either instance, the initial market cap would be $100 million.
Given its simplicity and effectiveness for risk assessment, the market cap can be a helpful metric in determining which stocks you are interested in, and how to diversify your portfolio with companies of different sizes.
Large-cap companies typically have a market capitalization of $10 billion or more. These companies have usually been around for a long time, and they are major players in well-established industries. Investing in large-cap companies does not necessarily bring in huge returns in a short period of time, but over the long run, these companies generally reward investors with a consistent increase in share value and dividend payments. Examples of large-cap companies—and keep in mind that this is an ever-changing sample—are Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Google parent Alphabet Inc.
Mid-cap companies generally have a market capitalization of between $2 billion and $10 billion. Mid-cap companies are established companies that operate in an industry expected to experience rapid growth. Mid-cap companies are in the process of expanding. They carry an inherently higher risk than large-cap companies because they are not as established, but they are attractive for their growth potential. One example of a mid-cap company is Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP).
Small-cap companies generally have a market capitalization of between $300 million to $2 billion. These small companies could be younger and/or they could serve niche markets and new industries. These companies are considered higher-risk investments due to their age, the markets they serve, and their size. Smaller companies with fewer resources are more sensitive to economic slowdowns.
As a result, small-cap share prices tend to be more volatile and less liquid than more mature and larger companies. At the same time, small companies often provide greater growth opportunities than large caps. Even smaller companies are known as micro-cap, with values between approximately $50 million and $300 million.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Note: I have published an updated version of my recent article “Cash Is Interesting Again. And Safe.” to reflect the higher interest being paid on cash accounts starting tomorrow with millions of dollars in insurance by both Flourish (increased to 4.55% for Tier 1 and 4.25% for Tier 2) and Betterment (increased to 4.50%). The updated version of the article can be viewed here.
Markets woke up on Monday morning to the news that First Republic Bank (FRC) had finally been taken behind the woodshed and shot in what is now the new second-largest bank failure in US history, snatching that dubious honor from Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) which now slips to the bronze medal position in that particular contest. FRC was seized by the regulators and JP Morgan Chase (JPM) won the takeover sweepstakes over the weekend.
FRC’s shareholders and bondholders are getting completely wiped out (just as with SVB and Signature Bank), while all of its $104 billion-worth of deposits, whether insured or uninsured, are being protected and back-stopped by JPM as is the way of things these days, it seems. JPM and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will share all the losses and any recoveries from the transaction.
Markets churned sideways on Monday, with investors twiddling their thumbs in advance of Wednesday’s Fed Day before deciding on Tuesday that they maybe weren’t going to like what they were going to hear the next day as well as turning their attention away from the now-resolved FRC saga onto other shaky regional banks. PacWest Bancorp (PACW), First Horizon (FHN) and Western Alliance (WAL) would seem to be the next problem children.
On Wednesday afternoon, the Federal Reserve followed expectations and approved another 0.25% interest rate rise. The decision marked the Fed’s tenth consecutive rate increase without a break aimed at battling inflation and brings its benchmark Federal Funds rate up to a range of between 5.00% and 5.25%, the highest since Beyonce warned us not to think that we were irreplaceable in 2007.
In a hint (but notably not a commitment) that officials could pause rate increases after the latest move, they deleted a phrase from their previous policy statement that had said some additional increases might be appropriate. Instead, officials said in their new statement that they would now monitor economic and financial market developments on an ongoing basis and make future interest rate decisions accordingly on a meeting-by-meeting schedule.
“We’re no longer saying that we anticipate further rate increases”, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said, calling that “a meaningful change.” He did, however, go out of his way to continue to push back against the idea of the imminent interest rate cuts that the market so strongly believes will happen later this year. He also reiterated in response to a question in the press conference the somewhat obvious notion that the Fed’s 2% inflation target (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) will not be satisfied by getting down to a 3% or 4% inflation rate.
This more-cautious-than-anticipated attitude and Powell’s failure to formally anoint a pause in favor of “data dependency” disappointed markets which had been looking for a less nuanced and more celebratory announcement of the final death of interest rate hikes and by the time the press conference ended, stocks had moved quite a bit lower. These concerns continued to trouble investors again on Thursday.
But to all intents and purposes, the Fed has now met the first half of the “hike/pause/pivot/cut” script that has helped prop up stock markets for most of 2023 in the face of some really quite disturbing economic data. So, with the Fed no longer applying pressure to the economy via higher rates, it makes economic growth now the absolute key to whether the next 10%-15% move in stock prices is up or down and it’s the economic data that will tell us which way it’s breaking and it all started with Friday’s US April Jobs Report.
When it came out before the market open, the report blew through all the estimates with a month-to-month increase in payrolls of 253k versus an average expectation of 185k and the previous month’s revised increase of $165k. The unemployment rate unexpectedly fell to a multi-decade low of 3.4%.
A few months back, such a white-hot Jobs Report may have sent stocks crashing on fears of more aggressive Fed rate hiking. But the world is suddenly a different place and now it provides reassurance that the economy still has momentum and is holding up remarkably well. Stocks responded by exploding higher during Friday’s session, also propelled by the long-awaited return of a bit of BTFD after a long absence.
But lurking in the shadows are the twin specters of a deteriorating regional bank situation and the possible debt ceiling s**t-show in Congress.
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen raised the stakes in the debt ceiling game of chicken on Monday, saying that the US could be in default of its debt obligations within a month if lawmakers persisted with their infuriating and nonsensical partisan posturing (not her exact words, but I’m pretty sure that’s what she meant) and Jerome Powell echoed her concerns in his press conference on Wednesday, calling for an immediate no-drama increase in the debt ceiling.
Bloomberg last week reported estimates that an actual US debt default could lead to the permanent loss of millions of American jobs, crush the stock market by 45% and collapse Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 6.1%. The Director of US National Intelligence also warned that China and Russia would likely seek to exploit any default by sowing and spreading global doubt about the value of the US Dollar as well as the US’ world leadership role and the sustainability of domestic institutions.
In other words, a debt default would be an absolute catastrophe for the United States that would endure long beyond 2023 and it is completely beyond belief that some in Congress seem willing to risk this to score petty political points.
OTHER NEWS ..
Openings closing .. The latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) - released just ahead of the Fed rate decision last week - pointed toward a pretty sizable collapse of the labor market. According to the survey, job openings fell for the third consecutive month, down to 9.6 million from a revised 10 million the previous month. This represents a current rate of about 1.6 available jobs per unemployed person. It marks the lowest number of job openings since April 2021, having now declined by more than 20% since the peak reading in March 2022 of over 12 million. However, they still have plenty more to fall before they reach the pre-pandemic levels of around 7.5 million.
And not only are job openings drying up, but layoffs are on the rise as well. According to the report, layoffs rose to 1.8 million, up from a revised 1.6 million a month earlier. This is the highest number of layoffs recorded in a month since December 2020 and certainly dialed up concerns about an upcoming recession.
Taste of his own medicine .. About a quarter of the value of Icahn Enterprises (IEP) was lost in a day on Tuesday and the stock hit a ten year low after research firm Hindenburg Research published a report saying that IEP was overvalued, holding assets at inflated prices and vulnerable to its founder Carl Icahn’s borrowing against its shares; in other words, the kind of mismanagement and malfeasance that Icahn often criticizes others for.
“Icahn has been using money taken in from new investors to pay out dividends to old investors,” Hindenburg wrote in its research note. “Such Ponzi-like economic structures are sustainable only to the extent that new money is willing to risk being the last one 'holding the bag.'"
Known as “The Corporate Raider," Icahn has made this name as an activist investor, buying up stock in companies and then agitating for change. Icahn’s recent activist targets include McDonalds (MCD), Kroger (KR) and Illumina (ILMN). Nathan Anderson-led Hindenburg Research has a track record of calling out fraud and misconduct at publicly-traded companies, most recently at Jack Dorsey-led Block (SQ).
More trouble at Coinbase .. A Coinbase investor filed what amounts to an insider-trading complaint against current and former executives, venture capitalist investors and board members, including CEO Brian Armstrong. The lawsuit alleges that Armstrong, Andreessen Horowitz, co-founder Fred Ehrsam, board members Kathryn Haun and Fred Wilson and other insiders all sold a collective $2.9 billion (!!!) of stock in connection with the direct listing “all the while in possession of material, non-public information.”
Adam Grabski, the investor who filed the lawsuit, bought shares on the day the crypto exchange went public in 2021. Within days, many analysts had already noted that the firm’s heavy reliance on transaction fees was concerning - 96% of Coinbase’s revenue came from transaction fees. Days later, the board apparently met, discussed pricing and made decisions that eventually resulted in the closure of Coinbase Pro, replaced by the lower-fee Coinbase Advanced Trade.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Right now you can drive a truck through the divergence in performance of Large Cap stocks and Small Cap stocks. Weakness in Small Caps via ever-vanishing investor risk appetite has taken a negative toll on the technical health of the entire investing environment beneath the surface. Remember, all most people see is the headline index performance which mostly reflects the performance of a handful of Super Mega Caps, but it is Small Caps that make up the majority of all stocks. The Percent of Small Cap Stocks Within 2% of Their One Year Highs has fallen from nearly 19% on February 2nd to a reading of barely over 7% on May 1st.
But now the weakness fully manifested in Small Cap stocks is starting to creep into the Mid Cap universe and the S&P 500 appears to be rising on fumes on its up-days. Any sudden surge in Supply will likely be met with insufficient Demand to soak it up and that reflects a market that is even more vulnerable than just weeks ago.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
It will be another busy week of earnings, including from Paypal, Devon Energy, Airbnb, Duke Energy, Occidental Petroleum, Electronic Arts, Tyson Foods, JD.com, Toyota, Honda, Roblox, Trade Desk, Tapestry and KKR.
The big economic highlight of the week comes on Wednesday, when we get to learn the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for April. Expectations are for a 5.0% year-over-year increase, matching the March data. The important Core CPI is expected to rise 5.4%.
The next day sees the release of the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers for April. This expected to increase by 2.4% year on year with the Core PPI expected to rise 3.3%.
On Friday, the University of Michigan releases its Consumer Sentiment Index for May. Forecasts call for a lower 62.6 reading.
The release of the Federal Reserve’s Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey (SLOOS) on bank lending practices doesn’t usually make many waves. Its release on Monday this week, however, could provide valuable insight into the future of the economy, showcasing how senior loan officers are operating following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank last month.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.43%, one month ago: 6.65%, one year ago: 5.27%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 24% (24% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 31% (37% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 45% (39% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 21 (Bearish by 15 a week ago)
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. most shorter term interest rates are higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.59%) being paid currently for the 1-month duration and the lowest rate (3.41%) for the 7-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year last week fell from 0.60% to 0.48%, indicating an overall flattening of the curve over the last five days.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2-year vs. the 10-year spread. Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 5.125%) on June 14th after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 11%, one month ago: 54%)
(one week ago: 65%, one month ago: 37%)
(one week ago: 24%, one month ago: 0%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - up 0.3% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 5.7% for the week
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 139 and fell by 12 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 161 and rose by 11 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 13.7% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 20.1% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of anticipated stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 1.4 point higher at 17.2. It remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and below its long term trend line.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
What to do with your 401k when you change jobs.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
FEDERAL RESERVE MANDATE
The US Federal Reserve's mandate was shaped in the 1970s. This was a period that experienced simultaneous high inflation and unemployment, a condition known as stagflation. Modifying the original act that established the Federal Reserve in 1913, the Federal Reserve Act of 1977 clarified the roles of the Board of Governors and Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC).
Congress explicitly stated the Fed's goals should be "maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates." It is these goals that came to be known as the Fed's "dual mandate" and remain today. In this article, we explore all three facets of the central bank's mandate by first looking at maximum employment before turning to the other two goals, which can effectively be treated as a single mandate.
Maximum Employment
Maximum employment is also referred to as full employment. It is the total measure of employment that the economy can experience without ushering in overt inflationary pressures. As such, almost everyone who wants a job can secure one during maximum employment. The goal, though, isn't to reach 100% employment and completely eradicate unemployment. That's just not possible.
Economists know there will always be some level of unemployment. People will always quit and start new jobs, businesses will fail and new ones will be set up, and specific sectors will contract and expand. Because it takes time to find a new job, there will always be a certain level of unemployment. As such, the level the Fed is tasked with achieving is not 0% unemployment.
The desired unemployment level is one that prevails in normal economic conditions or in the absence of a boom or recession. This rate is commonly referred to as the non-cyclical rate of unemployment—previously called the natural rate of unemployment). It is determined by structural factors that affect the flexibility or mobility of the labor market. For example, regulations that restrict labor mobility tend to raise the natural rate. But allowing individuals mobility to work in other regions can effectively reduce the natural rate of unemployment.
Stable Prices and Moderate Long-Term Interest Rates
People and businesses need to be reasonably confident that prices will remain relatively constant over time so they can make plans for the future. As a result, price instability in the form of either deflation or rapid inflation can have drastic consequences on economic stability.
As noted above, ensuring stable prices and moderate long-term interest rates could effectively be interpreted as a single mandate. That's because long-term nominal interest rates are set with inflation expectations in mind. For any given nominal interest rate, rapidly rising prices diminish the real interest rate that lenders receive and debtors must pay. Thus, in an unstable monetary environment with rapidly rising prices, lenders will want to charge much higher interest rates to mitigate the inflation-rate risk.
The FOMC began targeting inflation at 2% in January 2012 in order to achieve its dual mandate. This was just after combining the goals of stable prices and moderate long-term interest rates into a single one. As such, many see this as the Fed's attempt to be consistent with the single mandate of price stability sought by the European Central Bank (ECB).
By ensuring price stability, the Fed reasons that this inflationary target creates a stable economic environment that can foster the goal of maximum employment. When prices are stable, people and businesses can make longer-term economic decisions necessary for stable economic growth. This leads to improved employment opportunities.
The Bottom Line
Whether it is a triple, dual or single mandate, the primary aim of the Federal Reserve is to create a stable monetary environment. To achieve this, the Fed has deemed that targeting inflation (by keeping it at a low and stable rate of near 2%) is the best way to achieve such stability. So all the fuss about changing interest rates is really all about keeping prices stable in order to foster economic growth and promote maximum employment.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
With trading volumes contracting rapidly, the stock market - at least as represented by the major indexes - was acting early last week like it had already checked out for summer and it’s not even May yet. It was proving to be something of a snooze-fest with a generally negative tilt as far as the headline indexes were concerned. But under the surface, things were playing out rather differently.
Earnings and guidance are generally holding up better than expected, mostly beating estimates at a good clip - notably Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet/Google (GOOGL), Meta/Facebook (META) and Intel (INTC) last week. Indeed, 83% of non-financial companies have beaten earnings estimates so far this season (only 57% of financials).
This high beat-rate is, of course, a lot easier when the bar of these estimates has been consistently lowered by companies in considerably despondent forward guidance over the last couple of quarters banging on and on about how difficult 2023 was going to be. After all, the stock market is all about expectations versus reality.
Of some concern, however, is the fact that those firms whose earnings are failing to beat estimates seem to mainly be those that have their fingers on the pulse of the demand side of the economy, such as UPS, Caterpillar (CAT) and Packaging Corp of America (PKG) - and a number of these stocks got punished last week after announcing disappointing earnings and/or very cautious commentary/guidance.
So while macro-economic data is still broadly leaning towards a soft landing scenario (inflation to be conquered without a highly damaging recession), the micro-economic data around which types of companies are hurting more than others may be pointing in the other direction.
Early in the week, First Republic Bank (FRC) reported that customer deposits fell 40% or $72 billion in the first quarter during a ham-fisted earnings call. The already-incinerated stock got cut in half again in a matter of hours and then tumbled a further 30% the next day. On Friday, the stock price got cut in half yet again in the after-hours. While the market has now basically given up on First Republic as a viable stand-alone entity (rumors abound about a JP Morgan or PNC Bank absorption), the real damage will come if there are signs of further contagion into the likes of Zion Bank (ZION), Comerica (CMA), Bank of Hawaii (BOH) and Western Alliance (WAL).
It’s a sharp reminder that the banking sector is not yet out of the woods and indeed may well experience more pain ahead as a result of also being so entangled in the increasingly troubled world of commercial real estate that is suffering from enormously higher interest rates and vastly lower occupancy rates. A revival of banking stress simply isn’t priced into this market and its return will prove troublesome if it happens.
Stocks finished the week a touch higher after a mostly tranquil Monday, a difficult Tuesday and Wednesday but a powerful resurgence on Thursday and Friday as markets basked in the sunlight shone by earnings and guidance from some of the mega-cap tech names (FAAMG stocks, see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK BELOW). For the month of April, the S&P 500 added 1.5%, while the NASDAQ squeezed out just a small gain.
Congressional lawmakers’ continued reckless posturing around the debt ceiling appeared last week to have finally just about made it onto the radar of markets, although hardly in a meaningful way yet. For the moment at least, it still has the feel of a parent rolling their eyes after just noticing for the first time that their two toddlers are bickering over a toy. But the longer this nonsense goes on without resolution and the specter of 2011 starts emerging, the more nervous markets are going to get and the more a disastrous and completely unnecessary own goal becomes a possibility.
The Federal Reserve’s favorite inflation measure, the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price index ticked down only slightly, showing 4.6% inflation year-on-year, down from 4.7% a month ago, denting the assumption that inflation is coming down hard and pretty much cementing the fact that the Fed will raise interest rates by another 0.25% this coming Wednesday (still hovering above an 80% probability, see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below).
At first glance, the second estimate (of three) of Q1 2023 US Gross Domestic Product (GDP) numbers looked grim; rising at an annualized rate of just 1.1% versus the median expectation of 1.9% and far below the 2.6% growth in Q4 2022.
The underlying details look more encouraging, however. The biggest drag by far came from a huge swing in business inventories but that category is highly volatile and subject to big quarter-to-quarter moves.
The data also confirmed that business activity is stalling out as borrowing costs rise. Spending on new buildings, equipment and more rose by just 0.7% in Q1 2023 as compared to 6.0% and 4.0% the two previous quarters.
The housing recession was the first to show itself as being affected by the Fed’s interest rate hike campaign that started exactly a year ago. But the worst may now be over, with the sector becoming less and less of a drag on growth. As recently as Q3 2022, residential investment was plunging at a 27% annualized pace. In Q1 2023, it declined at barely a 4% rate.
The interpretation of the GDP numbers actually pushed back on the idea of a hard landing and it was that which cleared the way for the strong earnings from many of the big dogs to catapult stocks meaningfully higher over the last couple of trading days, along with the market’s persistent faith in the Fed’s “hike/pause/pivot/cut” narrative, part one of which comes into play this week with the latest Fed interest rate decision announcement.
The way this narrative sees things panning out is that a 0.25% hike on Wednesday afternoon will be the last as the central bank heads into a period of pause before pivoting to rate cuts before the end of the year. Certainly very possible but, as I have been saying, this world-view is so accepted and widespread (the futures market says that the probability of rates being higher at the end of the year than they are now is quite literally only at 3%, even though the Fed is insisting that they will not cut in 2023) that there is a lot of potential for disappointment if things don’t quite go as planned and that disappointment could translate into lower prices.
OTHER NEWS ..
80%-off sale ..The Wall Street Journal reported last week that a 22-story glass-and-stone office skyscraper on California Street in San Francisco, once home to some of the world’s most valuable commercial real estate, is expected to draw bids of about $60 million, compared with an estimated value of over $300 million in 2019. The office market is being hit nationwide, but San Francisco’s blow was especially hard, for reasons including high costs, heavy reliance on a tech industry quick to embrace hybrid work, and quality-of-life issues such as crime and homelessness.
Bye, bye BBBY .. The effort to save Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) has finally failed and the stock is plunging into the abyss. The struggling retailer announced it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection after being unable to raise enough funds to keep it afloat and will liquidate.
The company explained that it would continue to keep its remaining 360 stores stores open for the time being, but would begin to “effectuate the closure of its retail locations.” Bed Bath & Beyond also noted that while it has already started its liquidation process, it intends to use the Chapter 11 proceedings to “conduct a limited sale and marketing process for some or all of its assets”.
The stock had been a favorite of so-called “meme-stock” novice amateurs who kept on buying it as part of a self-styled war against institutional short-sellers. It looks like the retail day-traders are ending up on the wrong side of things yet again.
Less smoke .. We're all smoking far less but the most dramatic fall, according to a poll last week from Gallup, is among young adults ages 18 to 29, where the rate of smoking cigarettes dropped from 35% in the early 2000s to just 12% today. They went from the likeliest age group to smoke to the second-least-likely, behind only adults over 65.
Although rates of smoking cigarettes are falling fast, the decline in Americans' tobacco use has been partly reversed by the rise of vaping among young people. Still, even the combined share of young adults who smoke cigarettes and vape is still lower.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
If the October lows in the S&P 500 were to hold and markets began a new uptrend through a coming recession, it would be the first time in history that a bear market ended and the stock market bottomed out before a recession actually began. While not saying that this is in impossible feat, it would be unprecedented and that leaves market historians very cautious.
According to those who swear by the charts, a price of 4179 for the S&P 500 (which closed on Friday at 4169) is a key resistance level to beat for the bulls looking for a break beyond 4200 while 4117 is important support on the downside that, if broken, could open the door to a potentially quick drop to 4050.
A combination of both declining trading volume and declining volatility like we experienced in much of April reflects a market that is still relatively unsure of its direction. Investors are unwilling to commit large sums of capital one way or another. Last week was a great example; we saw sellers finally wake up on Tuesday and follow through again on Wednesday before being overwhelmed by buyers on Thursday and Friday. The net outcome was not a great deal of difference between Monday’s open and Friday’s close.
Masked by mega-cap price surges, this uncertain state of the broader universe of stocks with regard to its next major move is inconsistent with the early innings of a new sustainable bull market. Many short-term indicators are signaling that we might soon be moving down from a short-term high and other core indicators are frankly offering very little encouragement to buyers.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.39%, one month ago: 6.32%, one year ago: 5.10%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 24% (27% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 37% (38% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 39% (35% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 15 (Bearish by 8 a week ago)
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. most shorter term interest rates are higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.20%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest rate (3.44%) for the 10-year.
The closely-watched and most commonly-used comparative measure of the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year ended last week unchanged at 0.60%, indicating no change in the steepness of the curve over the last five days.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the 2-year vs. the 10-year spread. Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk deemed to be unusually higher than longer term.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of market close on Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 4.875%) on May 3rd after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 11%, one month ago: 53%)
(one week ago: 89%, one month ago: 47%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of market close on Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Meta/Facebook, Alphabet/Google) - up 3.8% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 0.9% for the week
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 151 and fell by 9 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 150 and rose by 5 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 12.9% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 20.2% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of anticipated stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 1.0 point lower at 15.8. It remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and below its long term trend line.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
John Oliver nails it, explaining recent events in crypto world ..
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
FAAMG STOCKS
FAAMG is an abbreviation coined by Goldman Sachs for five top-performing tech stocks in the market, namely, Meta (formerly Facebook), Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet’s Google. FAAMG may also go by the acronym, GAFAM.
FAAMG originated from the original acronym FANG, which was coined by CNBC’s Jim Cramer. FANG did not include Apple and Microsoft but did include Netflix. The new variation of the biggest tech companies does not include Netflix because of its relatively small market capitalization compared to the other five companies in FAAMG.
The replacement of Netflix with Microsoft in the list and the addition of Apple to now make it FAAMG made it a group of more technology-focused companies. While Amazon is also classified under the “consumer services” sector and “catalog/specialty distribution” sub-sector, it also has its cloud hosting business and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which make it a significant contributor to the technology space. So, essentially, FAAMG represents the US’ technology leaders whose products span mobile and desktop systems, hosting services, online operations, and software products.
FAAMG are termed growth stocks, mostly due to their year-over-year (YOY) steady and consistent increase in the earnings they generate, which translates into increasing stock prices. Retail and institutional investors buy into these stocks directly or indirectly through mutual funds, hedge funds, or exchange traded funds (ETFs) in a bid to make a profit when the share prices of the tech firms go up.
Although the five stocks only constitute a total of 1% of the 500 companies in the S&P 500, they make up a huge percentage of the market value weighting in the index. Since the S&P 500 index has widely been accepted as the best representation of the US economy, it follows that a collective upward (or downward) movement in the stock performance of FAAMG will most likely lead to a similar movement in the index and the market.
Among FAAMG stocks, the oldest company to list on the stock exchange is Apple which had its initial public offering (IPO) in 1980, followed by Microsoft in 1986, Amazon in 1997, Google in 2004, and Facebook in 2012.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy or completeness is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained or any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It is said on Wall Street that the goal of the market is to extract the maximum amount of pain from the greatest number of people. What this is getting at is that when everyone is positioned as bullish, the pain trade is for markets to move lower. When everyone is bearish, the pain trade is for them to go higher.
As such, the pain trade has been mostly inflicted on the bears so far in 2023 and is helping support stocks, despite decidedly dodgy economic fundamentals. Sentiment matters in the short-term and so the pain trade was to push the market higher to some degree, especially after general caution gave way to fully-fledged bearish sentiment following the bank failures in mid-March and increasing evidence that the economy may be starting to crash.
However, it seems that sentiment may shifting again after some surprisingly decent early earnings reports, recent hopeful inflation data and the end of rate hikes finally coming into view. It’s worth keeping an eye on sentiment in this regard (I show the latest AAII Investor Sentiment Index readings every week in this report, see below) as the direction of the pain trade may be about to flip.
For the moment markets remain resilient, but that resiliency has been underpinned by the aggressive idea of an imminent “Fed hike/pause/pivot/cut” interest rate narrative and an only-gradual slowing of economic growth. We won’t know if this thesis is correct until we can properly assess how deep the economic slowdown is going to be.
While the chances of the US completely avoiding a recession seem small, there is still a very legitimate possibility that it may only be a mild one. Consider the following ..
• The S&P 500 is up 25% from the pre-pandemic levels of January 2020.
• The National Home Price Index is up 38% from January 2020.
• Wages have risen 53% since January 2020.
• Pandemic stimulus across 476 million payments totaled more than $814 billion-worth of deposits which went straight into the pockets of American consumers.
• 90% of the $770 billion Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans have been completely or partially forgiven, injecting massive stimulus into the economy.
The critical point here is that consumers have simply had more money to work through before they have to start changing their behavior in response to inflation and the Fed’s interest rate hikes. This goes a long way to explaining why the Fed has had to raise interest rates again and again and again at a historically unprecedented rate of basically 0% to 5% in the space of a year, simply in order to get the attention of the American consumer who entered last year flush with stimulus money, a suddenly much more valuable home bought or re-financed using an ultra-low fixed rate mortgage, higher wages and a fatter investment portfolio. The result was that turbo-charged rate hike campaign that severely damaged both the stock and bond markets which made 2022 uniquely painful even for the most diversified of portfolios.
The first shots were fired last week in the upcoming congressional grandstanding about the debt ceiling (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below). “Let me be clear: a no-strings-attached debt limit increase cannot pass .. debt limit negotiations are an opportunity to examine our nation’s finances." bellowed House Speaker Kevin McCarthy during a speech at the New York Stock Exchange, of all places.Chuck Schumer shot right back,"If Speaker McCarthy doesn't change his course, he could well take this country to default."
Investors aren't yet paying any serious attention to the back-and-forth sniping, even though the last serious debt ceiling battle in 2011 did cause tumbling markets and a downgrade of US debt. While we can expect some occasional short-term market volatility at times when the irksome squealing reaches fever pitch, I think it is very important to maintain a distinction between tiresome short-term Washington gamesmanship and any potential long-term damage to investment portfolios.
Traders seem to have settled into the idea of a quarter-point rate increase from the Fed next month (that probability is now up to 89%, see FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL below) and early earnings have been mostly fine, with just a few disappointments here and there. The result has been a collective yawn for much of the last week or two. But with earnings about to hit full steam this week (see THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR below), investors will finally have plenty to think about beyond just inflation, interest rates and yield curves. Earnings season has a way of returning investors' attention to the fundamentals and the bottom line.
One of the single, most dominant market dynamics right now is the deeply inverted yield curve and, for that reason, starting this week I have begun to monitor it as one of my important data points shown in this report each week (see US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE below).
OTHER NEWS ..
Due Diligence Queen .. Investors recently launched lawsuits against Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced crypto bro founder of FTX and also against those who shilled for him in return for very large compensation, including quarterback Tom Brady and his ex-wife, Gisele Bündchen, Larry David, Kevin “Mr. Wonderful” O’Leary, David “Big Papi” Ortiz, tennis player Naomi Osaka as well as the NBA’s Steph Curry and Shaquille O’Neal. They were all charged along with others with taking a lot of money in order to participate in the duping of the millions who lost billions when SBF’s crypto house of cards came tumbling down.
However, there was one person who was smart enough not to fall for the hype. It emerged last week that, unlike the afore-mentioned money-grubbing band of hoodwinked celebs who’ll obviously say anything for a buck without looking into what it is they are peddling or any of their highly-compensated advisors who push them to do so in order to earn their own slice of the pie through commissions, Taylor Swift apparently thought to actually ask about the status of the investments as “unregistered securities”, promotion of which for financial gain makes an individual liable to claims for damages. She obviously did not like the answer she got since she declined the opportunity to promote SBF and his fraudulent enterprise.
You can shove your savings account .. Higher interest rates have so far been good news for the big banks, which have been able to charge borrowers more on loans and credit cards, but not pay as much interest to depositors. Currently, the annual interest rate paid to customers by big bank savings accounts averages a miserly 0.37% as opposed to an easily available 4.35% or more elsewhere).
Unsurprisingly, the banks’ clientele is increasingly telling the banks to stick their savings accounts and is moving its money into deposits at these other institutions and instruments that pay a much higher interest rate with zero fees and sometimes much higher levels of FDIC or SIPC insurance coverage than the traditional $250k per account offered by high street banks.
Credit spike .. Despite increasing interest charges, Americans spent big on credit cards in Q1 2023, according to an article in the Wall Street Journal last week. Bank of America said that spending on its credit cards rose 6% from a year earlier. Credit card spending was up 13% year-on-year at JP Morgan, 7% at Citigroup and 16% at Wells Fargo. Overall credit card loan balances rose sharply at the four banks, a sign that a growing number of people are now not paying off their full balances each month.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Anyone measuring the stock market’s health solely by the gains made in the S&P 500 is not seeing the big picture. While the index, along with its large-cap cousins, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and the NASDAQ, have enjoyed respectable gains since early March, this has obscured the fact that smaller stock indexes are still reeling from the bank-induced sell-off six weeks ago. When it is only the largest and most high profile portion of the market that is truly rallying, gains are typically unsustainable.
Lowry’s Percent of Large Cap Stocks 20% or More Below One Year Highs rose from 16% on the S&P 500 highs of February 2nd to 19% currently, indicating that less than one in five of Large Cap stocks are now in bear markets.
Lowry’s Percent of Mid Cap Stocks 20% or More Below One Year Highs rose from 23% on February 2nd to 34% currently, indicating that about one in three Mid Cap stocks are now in bear markets.
Lowry’s Percent of Small Cap Stocks 20% or More Below One Year Highs rose from 39% on February 2nd to 57% currently, indicating that well over half of all Small Cap stocks are now in bear markets.
So large caps are clearly responsible for propping up the major indexes. This type of behavior is the exact opposite of what occurs in the early stages of new bull markets when investors typically feel emboldened to take on more risk and reach for the most beaten-down, usually smaller stocks.
Such a selective rally indicates that the path of least resistance remains to the downside and that the recent advance may be on thin ice.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Q1 2023 earnings season ramps up hard this week, with some 170 of the S&P 500 firms scheduled to report, including many of the largest. These include Microsoft, Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook, Amazon, Intel, Exxon Mobil, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Verizon, T-Mobile US, Boeing, eBay, McDonald’s, General Motors, Chevron, General Electric, Caterpillar, Comcast, Eli Lilly, UPS, Visa, Mastercard, Newmont, 3M, Texas Instruments and, interestingly, First Republic.
We will get our first estimate of three for Q1 Gross Domestic Product (GDP). It's expected to show a seasonally-adjusted annualized rate of economic growth of 1.8%, following a 2.1% increase for all of 2022.
Other notable economic data coming out this week will include the Consumer Confidence Index for April and the Durable Goods report for March.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.27%, one month ago: 6.42%, one year ago: 5.11%)
Data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 27% (26% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 38% (39% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 35% (35% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 8 (Bearish by 9 a week ago)
Data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
US TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE ..
The interest rate yield curve remains “inverted” (i.e. most shorter term interest rates are higher than longer term ones) with the highest rate (5.19%) being paid currently for the 4-month duration and the lowest subsequent rate (3.57%) for the 10-year for a spread of 1.62% between the two.
A week ago this spread was 1.64%, indicating a slight flattening of the curve over the last five days.
The curve has been inverted since July 2022 based on the commonly-used comparative measure of the 2 year vs. the 10 year. Historically, an inverted yield curve has been regarded as a leading indicator of an impending recession, with shorter term risk unusually deemed to be higher than longer term.
Data courtesy of ustreasuryyieldcurve.com as of market close on Friday.
FEDWATCH INTEREST RATE PREDICTION TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 4.875%) on May 3rd after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 22%, one month ago: 36%)
(one week ago: 78%, one month ago: 60%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of market close on Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor & Gamble, Pepsico) - up 1.8% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - down 2.6% for the week
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 160 and fell by 10 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 145 and rose by 1 point over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 13.7% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 21.6% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of anticipated stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 0.3 points lower at 16.8. It remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and below its long term trend line.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Try to make your investment portfolio resemble a really damaging house fire.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
DEBT CEILING
The debt ceiling is the maximum amount of money that the United States can borrow cumulatively by issuing bonds. The debt ceiling was created under the Second Liberty Bond Act of 1917 and is also known as the debt limit or statutory debt limit.
If U.S. government national debt levels bump up against the ceiling, then the Treasury Department must resort to other extraordinary measures to pay government obligations and expenditures until the ceiling is raised again.
The debt ceiling has been raised or suspended numerous times over the years to avoid the worst-case scenario: a default by the U.S. government on its debt.
Congress had free rein over the country’s finances before the debt ceiling was created. In 1917, the debt ceiling was created during World War I to make the federal government fiscally responsible.
Over time, the debt ceiling has been raised whenever the United States has approached the limit. By hitting the limit and failing to pay interest payments to bondholders, the United States would be in default, lowering its credit rating and increasing the cost of its debt.
There has been controversy over whether the debt ceiling is constitutional. According to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law...shall not be questioned.” The majority of democratic countries do not have a debt ceiling, making the United States one of the few exceptions.
Implementing a debt ceiling is practical, allowing the U.S. Treasury to easily issue bonds without having Congress approve it each and every time the federal government needs to raise money—a pretty cumbersome process. With a debt ceiling, the boundaries are in place for a more efficient monetary approval process.
However, the debt ceiling has been notoriously fluid and raised a few times, raising questions on whether it’s effective as a tool to ensure fiscal responsibility. The U.S. has reached record-high levels of debt over time.
Pros:
Holds the nation’s finances in check
Can be used to fund federal operations
Improves efficiency in the government’s ability to fund obligations including Social Security and Medicare benefits
Cons:
Can be easily raised, encouraging fiscal irresponsibility
Lowers the U.S. credit rating and increases its cost of debt
Controversy over whether the debt ceiling is constitutional
There have been a number of showdowns over the debt ceiling, some of which have led to government shutdowns. The conflict is usually between the White House and Congress, and the debt ceiling is used as leverage to push partisan budgetary agendas.
For example, in 1995, the Republican members of Congress, whose views were vocalized by then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich, used the threat of refusing to allow an increase in the debt ceiling to negotiate increased government spending cuts.
Then-President Bill Clinton refused to make the cuts, which led to a shutdown of the government. The White House and Congress eventually agreed on a balanced budget with modest spending cuts and tax increases.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Last week was a busy one with plenty of economic data to chew on and lots of soundbites from International Monetary Fund (IMF)officialsand Federal Reserve presidents. It also marked the opening of the Q1 2023 earnings season.
Monday started out mostly jittery and trendless as the stock market tried to digest the Jobs Report from the holiday Friday before. Interestingly, the laggards were stocks in the defensive sectors like Utilities and Consumer Defensive that had outperformed the previous week, as worries eased about the prospect of an economic “hard landing” (i.e. inflation is only finally killed by a nasty recession).
The IMF said that the rampant inflation around the world of the past year or so, along with accompanying higher interest rates, will turn out to be just a blip on some charts. The recent banking turmoil (I think it’s generally agreed now that the term “banking crisis” is an overblown description of what happened and needs to be downgraded to “banking turmoil”) illustrates the concerns IMF economists have been voicing for a while as central bankers continually tighten monetary policy and raise interest rates.
“Downside risks dominate and the fog around the world economic outlook has thickened,” wrote IMF Director of Research Pierre-Oliver Gourinchas, bringing to mind the writing style of Charles Dickens who was, of course, the author of both “Hard Times” and “Great Expectations” - which, when combined, seem to conveniently express the two ends of the spectrum of the economic outlook right now.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation came out on Wednesday and showed a rise of just 0.1% from February to March, lower than the expectation of 0.2% after the previous month’s 0.4% gain. Annualized inflation in the US is now running at 5.0%; below expectations, the lowest level since May 2021 and down from 5.5% the month before.
Inflation might be cooling according to some metrics, but it isn't completely going away. Excluding volatile food and energy components, Core CPI actually accelerated a bit, ticking up 0.4% month-to-month and is up 5.6% year-on-year vs. 5.5% the previous month. Rises in the cost of housing and shelter was the largest contributor to the monthly increase.
The good news piled up the next day when we saw the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation affecting manufacturers (which is kind of a leading indicator for retail inflation). PPI fell 0.5% from February to March after being unchanged the previous month. The biggest factor was a sharp decline in gasoline costs. The annualized reading was up just 2.7%, falling precipitously from 4.9% the month before.
The fact is that many categories of goods have now returned to pre-pandemic levels of inflation and many commentators believe that is a good enough reason for the Fed to stop raising interest rates immediately. Futures markets are currently showing that probability as being 22% with a 78% chance of a 0.25% increase at the next meeting in early May (see FEDWATCH TOOL, below).
This heightened expectation of a maximum of just one more interest rate increase was also fueled by a slate of speeches midweek from Federal Reserve officials. Minneapolis Federal Reserve President Neel Kashkari said that he foresees headline inflation falling to the “the mid 3’s” by the end of 2023 and move closer to the Fed’s target range of 2.0% by next year. New York Fed President John Williams spoke about how he believed that the recent failures of Silicon Valley and Signature Banks were “unique” and “unlikely to reflect the broader trends in the financial system.” That helped ease some of the lingering market angst about the health of the banking sector.
The newly-released minutes from the Fed’s most recent policy-making meeting revealed that members anticipate a mild recession this year in the US partly because of the fallout from last month’s banking turmoil. They also projected that the unemployment rate will rise another full percentage point by the end of the year — an event that historically has only ever occurred during a recession.
Friday’s much better-than-expected Q1 2023 earnings from some of the big box banks was swiftly overshadowed by the release of data that showed consumer spending falling twice as much as expected in March. Retail Sales declined by a full 1.0% last month, much more than the expected 0.5% decline, as consumers seem to be increasingly keeping their hands in their pockets. It’s yet another sign that it's probably only a matter of time before a recession of some kind fully engulfs the US economy and the stock market ended Friday on a downbeat note, although the headline indexes were a little higher for the week overall.
The biggest question for markets is now not so much “will there be a recession?” , I think everyone now assumes that there will be - and pretty soon. It’s more about whether the recession is going to be an extended, deep and painful one (“Hard Times”) that results in sharp equity market losses and broader turmoil across financial markets or a shallow and relatively short-lived one (“Great Expectations”) that markets will be able to weather fairly well. The answer to that question still remains to be seen, but we are definitely getting closer to learning which it is.
The rally in March and April in stocks and bonds has been driven by anticipation of a“Fed hike, pause, cut” narrative, not actual hard improvement. That doesn’t mean it’s wrong (these expectations could end up being entirely accurate), but it does leave markets vulnerable to disappointment and if that disappointment comes about (a delayed pause? No prospect of a cut this year?), a 5%-10% pullback in stock prices shouldn’t surprise anyone.
Watch this space.
OTHER NEWS ..
Stamp-flation .. The price of postage stamps is poised to increase again in July for the second time in 2023 and the 17th rate change since 2000, under a new proposal by the US Postal Service (USPS). If approved by the Postal Regulatory Commission, this would be the shortest time between increases in history. Rates last went up just three months ago and before that, in July 2022. In contrast, between 1970 and 2000, rates only increased once on average every two to three years.
The Postal Service said the proposed increases raise first class mail by approximately 5.4% to “offset the rise in inflation” and are needed “to address continued elevated inflation and prior years defective pricing model”.
With the proposed rates, postage for a first class 1-ounce letter will go to 66 cents, up from 63 cents and 2x the 1999 rate of 33 cents. The Postal Service said it is also "seeking price adjustments for Special Services products including Certified Mail, Post Office Box rental fees, money order fees and the cost to purchase insurance when mailing an item".
Much less swiping going on .. Office vacancy rates hit a record high in New York and rose nationwide as tenants cut back on space they don't need because so many employees are working from home.
In New York City, the office vacancy rate rose to a record 16.1% in Q1 2023, representing more than 76 million square feet of empty office space, according to a report by commercial real estate firm, JLL. As office leases, which typically run 10 years or more, expire, companies are reassessing their space needs and not in a good way for the commercial real estate market in New York.
That vacancy rate means about 84% of available space is theoretically being leased but that absolutely does not mean that it's all being used. New York's actual office occupancy rate is more like around 49%, according to Kastle Systems, which tracks card swipes through its security systems.
Careful what you wish for .. If history is any guide the market may be overestimating the positive effects of interest rate cuts, if they happen. The previous occasions when the Fed has embarked on a meaningful rate-cutting cycle have tended to work best (i.e., resulted in very positive stock market returns in the following year or two) when rates are being cut from very high starting point (e.g. 1981: from 20.0%, 1974: from 13.0%) and it’s mostly a far less exciting outcome historically when rates were being cut starting from lower levels (e.g. 2007: from 5.25%, 1995: from 6.0%).
If the Fed does begin cutting rates later this year, as the market expects (but the Fed denies), the starting point is likely to be barely above 5.0% or maybe even lower. So, it may be prudent to hold off on popping the champagne corks too early, even when those long-anticipated interest rate cuts from the Fed do eventually materialize.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The net percent spread Between Buying Power and Selling Pressure has been essentially stuck in a range since at least last October. The spread continues to hover near zero, crossing one way then the other frequently and is currently sitting right on its 40-week moving average. That is a lot of heat and light over the last six months or so expended on basically going nowhere.
93% of stocks are above their 10-day moving average, giving short term hope to those anticipating an imminent return to finally paying taxes on some capital gains (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) but looking further out, only 61% are above their 30-week moving average and that’s way down from the 83% reading of as recently as February 2nd. Unfortunately the longer term averages usually trump the shorter term ones when it comes to determining what is really going on beneath the surface and this one is trending strongly lower.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week will be chock full of Q1 2023 earnings reports along with several more indicators on the US economy and housing.
The big dogs reporting earnings this week include Tesla, Netflix, Charles Schwab, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Johnson and Johnson, IBM, Morgan Stanley, Procter and Gamble, AT&T, Freeport-McMoRan, Taiwan Semi-Conductor, Lockheed Martin, Schlumberger, Abbot Laboratories, Las Vegas Sands and United Airlines.
Economic-data highlights next week include the Leading Economic Indicators index and both the manufacturing and the services purchasing managers’ indexes.
There will also be several indicators of US housing market activity released this week. including the Housing Market Index, New Residential Construction statistics and Existing Home Sales numbers.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.28%, one month ago: 6.60%, one year ago: 5.00%)
Weekly data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 26% (33% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 39% (32% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 35% (35% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread: ↓Bearish by 11 (Bearish by 2 a week ago)
Weekly data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
FEDWATCH TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate, currently 4.875%) on May 3rd after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 29%, one month ago: 46%)
(one week ago: 71%, one month ago: 41%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of market close on Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Financials (two biggest holdings: Berkshire Hathaway, JP Morgan Chase) - up 3.0% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co) - down 1.4% for the week
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 170 and rose by 9 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 144 and fell by 16 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 13.7% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 21.1% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of anticipated stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 1.3 points lower at 17.1. It remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and below its long term trend line.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
In 2021 and 2022, if someone asked, “Should I buy an I Bond?”, the answer was definitely ‘yes’. Today the answer is, at best, ‘maybe’.Are I Bonds losing their luster?
(for my explanation of I Bonds and how they work, see here)
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
CAPITAL GAIN
The term capital gain refers to the increase in the value of a capital asset when it is sold. Put simply, a capital gain occurs when you sell an asset for more than what you originally paid for it.
Almost any type of asset you own is a capital asset. This can include a type of investment (like a stock, bond, or real estate) or something purchased for personal use (like furniture or a boat).
Capital gains are realized when you sell an asset by subtracting the original purchase price from the sale price. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) taxes individuals on capital gains in certain circumstances.
Capital gains are typically realized at the time that the asset is sold. Capital gains are generally associated with investments, such as stocks and funds, due to their inherent price volatility. But they can also be realized on any security or possession that is sold for a price higher than the original purchase price, such as a home, furniture, or vehicle.
Capital gains fall into two categories:
Short-term capital gains: Gains realized on assets that you've sold after holding them for one year or less
Long-term capital gains: Gains realized on assets that you've sold after holding them for more than one year
Both short- and long-term gains must be claimed on your annual tax return. Understanding this distinction and factoring it into investment strategy is particularly important for day traders and others who take advantage of the greater ease of trading in the market online.
Realized capital gains occur when an asset is sold, which triggers a taxable event. Unrealized gains, sometimes referred to as paper gains and losses, reflect an increase or decrease in an investment's value but are not considered a capital gain that should be treated as a taxable event. For example, if you own stock that goes up in price, but you haven't yet sold it, that is an unrealized capital gain.
Short- and long-term capital gains are taxed differently. Remember, short-term gains occur on assets held for one year or less. As such, these gains are taxed as ordinary income based on the individual's tax filing status and adjusted gross income (AGI).
Long-term capital gains, on the other hand, are taxed at a lower rate than regular income. The exact rate depends on the filer's income and marital status, and can range from 0% to 20% (higher net worth investors may have to also pay the additional net investment income tax, on top of the 20% they already pay for capital gains).
A capital loss is the opposite of a capital gain. It is incurred when there is a decrease in the capital asset value compared to an asset's purchase price.
Note that there are some caveats. Gains on certain types of stock or “collectibles” (such a precious metals, either held physically or as a security such as an ETF) may be taxed at a higher 28% capital gains rate regardless of holding period and real estate capital gains can go as high as 25%.
In addition, certain types of capital losses are not deductible. If you sell your house or car at a loss, you will be unable to deduct the difference on your taxes. unless what you sell is your primary residence (as determined by certain criteria laid down by the IRS) when the first $250,000 is exempt from capital gains tax. That figure doubles to $500,000 for married couples.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The week and the month began with investors shifting their attention away from March's banking turmoil and back to the risk of a recession that could drag down consumer spending, thereby corporate profits and thereby stock prices. And the holiday-shortened week provided plenty for them to focus on.
Unexpected output cuts from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC, see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) were announced on Monday after oil prices dipped in March amid the banking stress and fears over the global economic outlook.
Unsurprisingly, oil prices and oil stocks soared to start the quarter’s first trading day, as did the odds of another quarter point hike by the Federal Reserve next month. That’s because higher oil prices is a potential blow in the Fed’s battle against inflation, a fight it had looked to be slowly winning.
The White House got very grumpy about the move. It was apparently made clear through diplomatic channels that, given the cost of living issues in the US and broad market uncertainty, it considered this production cut as “ill-advised”.
Pretty much all the economic data released before the big one (the Jobs Report on Friday) implied that the economy isn't just lifting its foot off the gas pedal, it may now be stomping on the brakes.
The US manufacturing activity index fell to 46.3, to its lowest level since it completely collapsed back in those frightening dark days of May 2020. Numbers below 50 indicate contraction and by this index, manufacturing has now been contracting for four straight months. The overall reading has fallen to this level only sixteen other times in the index’s history dating back to 1948. In twelve of those sixteen instances, the economy was either already in a recession or fell into one shortly after.
Employers seem to be finally pulling back from their breakneck, hire-at-all-costs approach of 2022. The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) for February showed a very sharp 632k decline in job openings to a much lower total of 9.93 million with declines across all industries and sectors. Estimates had been for 10.45 million openings. This represents over 2 million fewer job openings than there were a year ago. For context, however, the pre-pandemic record-ever high in job openings was around 7.5 million. Another example of how the pandemic broke data.
We also learned that service industry expansion was coming to a screeching halt and that factory orders were disappointing.
The market seemed somewhat confused and appeared unsure which way to react. There was push-me/pull-you pressure being exerted on stock prices from two distinctly different camps.
The optimists’ case was that all this recession-pointing data took a lot of pressure off the Fed to keep raising rates and that the absolute worst case for the next meeting in early May would be one final quarter of a point hike (71% probability, see FEDWATCH TOOL below) but with a pause and no increase at all still very much on the table (29% probability). Good for stocks.
However, an increasingly common narrative is that it’s economic data, not the banking situation and not the Fed, that will mostly determine whether the next 10%-15% move in the S&P 500 is higher or lower.
That’s because the major unknown for investors is whether the economy falls into a recession or not. It’s not how much more the Fed hikes rates (we know it’s not much more, if at all), and it’s not whether the government will rescue depositors in the case of other regional bank failures (we pretty much know that they will).
On that basis, the pessimists’ case is that bad news about the economy is now simply bad news which means likely lower corporate earnings and less tolerance for risk by investors. Bad for stocks.
We then had the rather strange and unusual situation on Friday of the all-important Jobs Report coming out at 8:30am ET on a day when the stock market was closed for a holiday and therefore unable to immediately react.
Payrolls grew by 236k in March, totally in line with estimates and below the upwardly-revised 326k in February. The unemployment rate somewhat surprisingly ticked lower to 3.5% and average hourly earnings rose 0.3%, pushing the year-on-year increase to 4.2%, the lowest level for that reading since June 2021.
Although still elevated by historic standards, this increase in jobs was the smallest of the entire post-pandemic economic recovery and definitely appeared to fall into a “Goldilocks” sweet spot of not too hot (which could embolden the Fed to definitely keep raising rates) and not too cold (stark evidence of a recession).
OTHER NEWS ..
Layoffs soaring .. US employers have recently dealt with higher borrowing costs and moved to reduce expenses by increasingly laying off staff, according to executive coaching firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.
US employers announced 89k job cuts last month alone, a 15% increase from February and a rise of over 300% compared to March 2022, continuing a trend seen all year so far. For Q1 2023, layoff announcements skyrocketed by almost 400% from Q1 2022.
Technology workers have been the hardest hit, with 38% of all layoffs so far this year coming from that sector. Over 100k employees have been laid off from tech firms so far in 2023, a massive jump from the same period last year.
Poor reward .. The reward offered for owning stocks over bonds hasn’t been this small since before the 2008 financial crisis. This reward is known as the Equity Risk Premium (ERP); the gap between the S&P 500’s earnings yield and that of the 10-year Treasury Bond currently sits at around 1.6 percentage points, a low not seen since now-notorious convicted crypto shiller Soulja Boy first suggested that we crank that in 2007. That is well below the average gap of around 3.5 percentage points since then.
The reduction is a potential challenge for stocks going forward. Owning stocks needs to promise a meaningfully higher reward than owning bonds over the long term. Otherwise, taking the higher risk of owning equities relative to holding risk-free US Treasury bonds would begin to stop making sense from a risk/return standpoint and liquidation of stocks for the purchase of bonds would likely accelerate, driving stock prices lower.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Only 25% of the stocks in the S&P 500 are currently outperforming the index. Read that again, it’s a remarkable statement. This low level has only been reached a few times in history. This is the very definition of a market (as determined by a headline index) being propped up by just a relative handful of very large (mostly tech or tech-adjacent) stocks.
This degree of concentration is confirmed by the fact that the smaller the capitalization index, heading down from Mega Cap to Large Cap to Mid Cap to Small Cap to Micro Cap, the weaker the price performance. This makes uncomfortable reading for the bulls as sustainable turnarounds have historically been led by stocks on the smaller end of the capitalization spectrum.
Prime technical indicators getting back towards news highs would be a minimum requirement for an improved environment, but that is simply not what is in place today. The probabilities therefore favor a continuation and even a possible acceleration of the primary trend which is still a downward one, which could still possibly take prices back down to, and maybe even break through, those lows of October last year.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.32%, one month ago: 6.65%, one year ago: 4.72%)
Weekly data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 33% (22% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 32% (32% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 35% (46% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 2 (Bearish by 24 a week ago)
Weekly data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
FEDWATCH TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate) on May 3rd after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 52%, one month ago: 0%)
(one week ago: 48%, one month ago: 61%)
How does the market view the probability that interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 4.875%) will be at/above (≥) the following rates at year-end?
(one week ago: 96%, one month ago: 100%)
(one week ago: 77%, one month ago: 100%)
(one week ago: 46%, one month ago: 100%)
(one week ago: 14%, one month ago: 99%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of market close on Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: UnitedHealth Group, Johnson and Johnson) - up 4.4% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Industrials (two biggest holdings: Raytheon Technologies, UPS) - down 2.2% for the week
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 161 and fell by 10 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 160 and rose by 9 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 14.4% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 21.3% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of anticipated stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 0.3 points lower at 18.4. It remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Trading options as a retail investor is one of the quickest and most efficient ways to destroy your wealth by basically handing it over to Wall Street market makers. The data is in.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
ORGANIZATION OF PETROLEUM EXPORTING COUNTRIES (OPEC)
The term Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) refers to a group of 13 of the world’s major oil-exporting nations. OPEC was founded in 1960 to coordinate the petroleum policies of its members and to provide member states with technical and economic aid. OPEC is a cartel that aims to manage the supply of oil in an effort to set the price of oil on the world market, in order to avoid fluctuations that might affect the economies of both producing and purchasing countries.
OPEC, which describes itself as a permanent intergovernmental organization, was created in Baghdad in September 1960 by founding members Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela. Apart from these five founding members, other current members of the cartel are:
Libya (joined in 1962)
United Arab Emirates (1967)
Algeria (1969)
Nigeria (1971)
Gabon (1975)
Angola (2007)
Equatorial Guinea (2017)
Congo (2018)
It is notable that some of the world’s largest oil producers, including Russia, China, and the United States, are not members of OPEC, which leaves them free to pursue their own objectives.
The headquarters of the organization are in Vienna, Austria, where the OPEC Secretariat, the executive organ, carries out OPEC’s day-to-day business.
According to the OPEC website, the group's mission is “to coordinate and unify the petroleum policies of its Member Countries and ensure the stabilization of oil markets in order to secure an efficient, economic, and regular supply of petroleum to consumers, a steady income to producers, and a fair return on capital for those investing in the petroleum industry.”
The organization is committed to finding ways to ensure that oil prices are stabilized in the international market without any major fluctuations. Doing this helps keep the interests of member nations while ensuring they receive a regular stream of income from an uninterrupted supply of crude oil to other countries.
There are several advantages of having a cartel like OPEC operating in the crude oil industry. First, it promotes cooperation among member nations, helping them alleviate some degree of political hostilities. And because the organization's main goal is to stabilize oil production and prices, it is able to exert some influence over production from other nations.
OPEC’s influence on the market has been widely criticized. Because its member countries hold the vast majority of crude oil reserves (80.4%, according to the OPEC website), the organization has considerable power in these markets. As a cartel, OPEC members have a strong incentive to keep oil prices as high as possible while maintaining their shares of the global market.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The S&P 500 ended the week, month and quarter sitting almost exactly in the middle of its range over the last year and a strange calm seems to have descended upon markets. No scary news from the banking sector last week allowed investors to focus on other things, such as earnings and economic releases, which were mostly pretty good.
Traders started the week with a smile on their faces as they learned that First Citizens BancShares (FCNCA), a North Carolina-based regional bank, had agreed to take over substantially all of the assets and liabilities of collapsed Silicon Valley Bank (SVB).
The big economic news of the week was the release of the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index. This is the inflation reading that the Fed trusts for measuring inflationary pressures even more than the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as it believes it more closely tracks spending decisions by US consumers and therefore, in many ways, it’s a more important measure when it comes to assessing the Fed’s position.
The PCE index rose 0.3% last month, less than the 0.5% expectation and well down from the 0.6% rise in January. On an annual basis, the index was up 5.0%, decelerating from 5.3% the month before. The important Core PCE Price index, which excludes volatile food and energy costs, was up 0.3% last month and is now down to 4.6% year-over-year, below the level of short term interest rates for the first time in a long time.
These numbers were all regarded as very positive and boosted optimism that the Fed might be able to pull back on their aggressive efforts to fight inflation with a possible pause next time out in May and even possible rate cuts before year-end, although Fed officials continue to deny that such rate cuts are even under consideration. It should be pointed out, however, that this data does not reflect any economic slowdown or tightening of credit conditions resulting from the bank chaos of the last two or three weeks.
This is the fear for the economy; a mini credit-crunch for corporate America (particularly small and mid-size firms), brought about by tighter lending controls instigated by the spooked banks themselves, but also coming down from the regulators.
A brief explainer/reminder of how we got here:
If you were a bank like SVB, you decided to own longer maturity 100% credit-secure US Treasury bonds that you had priced on your balance sheet as if you were going to hold them till the maturity of the bond. The fact that the current re-sale market prices of these bonds had dramatically fallen in value as interest rates have moved back higher didn’t really matter if you are going to hold on to them for their entire duration, as was the original plan, since you weren’t going to be selling them at that current price. If you aren’t selling them, why would you care what the going price is for these bonds?
Until suddenly your customers are pulling their deposits out for a variety of reasons ranging from the implosion of crypto, newly-expensive borrowing costs, VC money drying up, margin calls (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK, below) on huge losing stock positions in tech/growth stocks - whatever it may be. And the only way to have enough money to fulfill those withdrawal obligations is to actually sell these bond assets in advance of their maturity, something you never planned to do. And all of a sudden, that much lower current price for these assets really does matter!
You are now losing millions upon millions of dollars in hours and days versus what your accountants valued the assets at, as those previously unconcerning paper losses suddenly become real losses. The rest of your customers see what’s happening and self-preservation takes over and they pull their deposits too. And so the death-spiral begins.
The reason the market responded so well to the simple fact that things didn’t get noticeably worse in the banking sector last week is because it is really, really, really important that First Republic (FRC) and any of the other at-risk regional banks like PacWest Bank (PACW), Comerica (CMA) and Zions Bancorporation (ZION) do not fail or become forcibly absorbed by a big box bank. If that happens, contagion will be confirmed and all bets are off.
And then where would the next problems become apparent? Keep half an eye on commercial real estate if that happens. In fact, come to think of it, keep half an eye on commercial real estate anyhow.
But a sense began to emerge last week that perhaps that bullet might have been dodged with no further meaningfully damaging news coming out of the sector.
The Trump circus is being completely ignored by markets and will continue to be unless something highly dramatic comes out of left field, which of course cannot be ruled out.
The short term major market focus is (in order):
Is there an extended banking crisis?
Will the Fed cut rates before year-end?
Will there be a recession?
What’s happening to inflation?
Last week, the market’s responses felt like:
We increasingly think probably not.
The Fed says no, we think yes.
Maybe, maybe not - but even if there is one, it might be mild and short.
It may be sticky in parts, but it is generally moving steadily lower.
These sentiments can change very fast from week to week obviously, but by Friday they had contributed to positive end to the day, week, month and quarter (I’ll be publishing my quarterly market review sometime this coming week).
OTHER NEWS ..
Crypto alert .. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) last week issued an official warning to investors on the risks of investing in crypto asset securities. It stated what has become blindingly obvious, that crypto investments are highly volatile and speculative and that the platforms that provide them may not have the necessary protections for investors. Additionally, companies offering crypto asset investments may not comply with federal securities laws. The SEC also urged investors to exercise a lot of caution when relying on Proof of Reserves, a method used by crypto asset entities to supposedly offer evidence that they have sufficient reserve assets to cover customers' balances.
The SEC emphasized the other undeniable point that registration by entities such as Registered Investment Advisors (RIAs, like Anglia Advisors) provides important protections for investors and, conversely, unregistered entities that deal in crypto have no such protections.
The meh-taverse .. Disney last week entirely shut down the internal division that was developing its metaverse strategies. Microsoft recently permanently closed down a social virtual-reality platform that it acquired to a big fanfare in 2017. Even Mark Zuckerberg, who not long ago bet the entire farm on the metaverse, recently cut several positions and projects in Meta/Facebook’s metaverse division and focused far more on artificial intelligence (AI) on the most recent earnings call last month during which the buzzword-mention score was: AI 28, metaverse 7.
Meanwhile, the price for virtual real estate in some online worlds, where users can hang out as avatars, has completely cratered - to the surprise of almost no-one inhabiting planet Earth. Apparently, the median sale price for land in Decentra-land (yes, there is such a virtual place!) has declined 90% from a year ago.
College isn’t worth the cost, say the majority of Americans .. A Wall Street Journal survey found that 56% of Americans now think earning a four-year bachelor’s degree is a bad financial bet, up from 40% in 2013 and a new low in confidence in the monetary value of a college education. There’s a significant divergence in respondents from different age groups and skepticism is strongest among people ages 18-34. Also, the opinions of people who themselves do hold college degrees have soured the most over the last decade.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The technical state of the market is far more precarious than is implied by the increasingly positive market sentiment described above.
The “no-man’s land” I mentioned in last week’s report with price and indicators very much in the middle of their respective ranges and apparently going nowhere, is proving to be a problem with elevated risk for bulls and bears alike.
The indicators are not oversold enough to yet reflect the necessary exhaustion of Supply, yet they are not above key thresholds to imply the return of enthusiastic Demand. Indeed they are not even close to any of these levels. They just, are.
Even short-term trends in Buying Power and Selling Pressure are not helping. Over the past few weeks, both indexes have stopped moving in equally contrasting directions to each other, with unfavorable trends for both having been in place since early February.
In traditional technical analysis, trends are presumed to remain in force until reversed. We got partial proof of a strengthening market in late January, when many favored indicators, including market breadth, broke through their prior highs. However, when we had rebounded off the lows back in October 2022, there was (as discussed extensively in this report at the time) insufficient technical evidence that the major trend had turned, and therefore the prior cautious posture remains in place, despite January’s temporary spike in technical positivity.
The best we can say about the market now is that there is no trend, as stocks, on average, are making no net progress in the middle of a wide trading range. It can certainly not be not ruled out that the stock market will re-visit those October lows, which is the the bottom of that range.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The upcoming holiday-shortened trading week (US stock markets will be closed on Friday for Good Friday, while bond markets will have themselves a half-day) will see a few major economic-data releases, headlined by the all-important Jobs Report which will still come out on Friday morning, in spite of the stock market being closed that day. Consensus estimates are for a 200k increase in US jobs created in March and for the unemployment rate to remain unchanged at 3.6%.
The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) on Tuesday is expected to show 400k fewer job openings, down to 10.45 million as of the last business day of February.
This week's corporate calendar is quiet, before JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citigroup all kick off Q1 2023 earnings season the following week.
While we await that, we have investor events from from Walmart, FedEx and Waste Management to keep us occupied.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.42%, one month ago: 6.50%, one year ago: 4.67%)
Weekly data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 22% (21% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 32% (30% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 46% (49% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 24 (Bearish by 28 a week ago)
Weekly data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
FEDWATCH TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate) on May 3rd after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 80%, one month ago: 0%)
(one week ago: 20%, one month ago: 73%)
How does the market view the probability that interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 4.875%) will be at/above (≥) the following rates at year-end?
(one week ago: 38%, one month ago: 100%)
(one week ago: 10%, one month ago: 100%)
(one week ago: 3%, one month ago: 100%)
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 99%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of market close on Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - up 6.3% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: UnitedHealth Group, Johnson and Johnson.) - up 1.9% for the week
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 171 and rose by 19 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 151 and fell by 18 points over the course of the week. Buying Power last week moved back into a dominant position over Selling Pressure.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, now sits well above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 14.3% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains way above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 20.6% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of anticipated stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 3.0 points lower at 18.7. It is now well below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The biggest mistake in investing.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
MARGIN CALL
A margin call occurs when the percentage of an investor’s equity in a margin account falls below the broker’s required amount. An investor’s margin account contains securities bought with a combination of the investor’s own money and money borrowed from the investor’s broker.
A margin call refers specifically to a broker’s demand that an investor deposit additional money or securities into the account so that the value of the investor's equity (and the account value) rises to a minimum value indicated by the maintenance requirement.
A margin call is usually an indicator that securities held in the margin account have decreased in value. When a margin call occurs, the investor must choose to either deposit additional funds or marginable securities in the account or sell some of the assets held in their account.
What triggers a margin call? .. When an investor pays to buy and sell securities using a combination of their own funds and money borrowed from a broker, the investor is buying on margin. An investor’s equity in the investment is equal to the market value of the securities minus the borrowed amount.
A margin call is triggered when the investor’s equity, as a percentage of the total market value of securities, falls below a certain required level (called the maintenance margin).
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)—the regulatory body for the majority of securities firms operating in the United States—each requires that investors maintain an equity level of 25% of the total value of their securities when buying on margin.23 Some brokerage firms require a higher maintenance requirement, sometimes as much as 30% to 40%.
Margin calls can occur at any time due to a drop in account value. However, they are more likely to happen during periods of market volatility.
How to avoid a margin call .. Before opening a margin account, investors should carefully consider whether they really need one. Most retail investors don't ever need to buy on margin to earn solid long term returns [note; it is always my recommendation that no client of Anglia Advisors ever use margin].
It is certainly riskier to trade stocks with margin than without it. This is because trading stocks on margin is trading with borrowed money. Leveraged trades are riskier than unleveraged ones. With margin trading, investors can lose more than they have invested. Besides, the loans aren't free. Brokerages charge interest on them.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
A decent gain in stock prices on Monday was put down to a combination of an oversold bounce from the anguish of the two prior sessions, UBS finally putting Credit Suisse (CS) out of its misery by buying their Swiss banking rival for less than half of its value as well as not-too-guarded optimism about what Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell might say in his press conference later in the week, specifically speculating that he might formally announce that the rate-hiking cycle was over.
Concerns about First Republic Bank (FRC) just refused to go away. Despite stories of an orchestrated rescue by other banks and special treatment from regulators, the stock fell to below 10% of its value from earlier this month. That is danger territory.
By Tuesday night, the markets had pretty much decided that a quarter of a point rate hike was going to happen the next day (87% probability) and the Federal Reserve duly delivered, approving that exact interest rate increase in its 2pm announcement. It signaled (but did not guarantee) that we may be almost there when it finally comes to the end of year-long interest rate-rise campaign.
The decision marked the Fed’s ninth consecutive rate increase without a break and brings the benchmark Federal Funds Rate to 4.875%, the highest level since the Plain White T’s tried to get Delilah’s attention back in 2007.
The Fed also released its quarterly “Dot Plot” which maps out the policymakers' expectations for where they think interest rates will go in the future. This suggested that the Fed committee members see rates peaking at 5.1% this year, implying that there will be just one more quarter-point hike before the long-awaited pause.
The committee members’ expectations are that interest rates will be lower at 4.1% at the end of 2024 and down to 3.1% at the end of 2025. However, Powell said during his press conference that a rate cut in 2023 was “not a part of our baseline expectation”.
The market, however, doesn’t believe a word of it and the futures are currently pricing the probability of interest rates being lower at the end of this year than they are now as a 100% certainty (see FEDWATCH TOOL, below).
The market reaction to the Fed announcement was one of disappointment. A radical change from the Fed in the face of this bank stress had been aggressively priced in to stocks already and it didn’t happen. Instead we were treated to a rather uninspiring and, frankly, dull response from a seemingly unruffled Fed, with Powell even dismissing the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank as “an outlier” in an otherwise-”sound banking system”.
And so, for about the zillionth time in the last year, the stock market was again burned by its over-optimism and exuberance about what was going to happen with interest rates.
To make matters worse; while JP was speaking to the press, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen was asked at a Senate hearing if the Treasury was looking at taking steps to swiftly expand bank account deposit insurance in the light of recent events."This is not something that we have looked at. It's not something that we are considering," she said during what was an uncharacteristically nervous performance. Following these rather clumsy comments, a moderate stock selloff that had been kicked off by frustration with the Fed accelerated into a full-blown price slump late in the afternoon.
Yellen somewhat walked back her remarks on Thursday but stocks, clearly still jittery about the banks, responded by just churning aimlessly up and down on high volume, a strong indication of market indecision and lack of conviction in either direction.
On Friday morning, Germany’s prestigious Deutsche Bank moved into the limelight as the price of their credit default swaps (basically the insurance premium against the bank going out of business, see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) rocketed on fears of the size and nature of their exposure to recently troubled institutions.
Management and German government officials were hastily rushed out to say that there were no problems, which of course is a sure sign that there are problems. Markets initially fell quite hard on the news but recovered later to finish the day - and the week - moderately in the green.
What will determine the next 10%-20% move in the S&P 500 isn’t when or even if the Fed hikes interest rates by another 0.25%, but instead whether we get a hard or soft economic landing.
The Fed acknowledged that the banking crisis is likely not helpful when it comes to this outcome, given the important role that regional banks play in the very existence of countless small businesses throughout the country and the possible reduction in the availability of credit to these companies.
To put it bluntly, if the reason that the Fed is ending rate hikes is because economic risks are now highly elevated, then that’s not a reason to buy stocks.
So upcoming economic data remains the absolute key. If the data rolls over in the next month or two indicating a rapid and sharp loss of economic momentum, we should expect material downside in stock markets, with the October 2022 lows and beyond very much under threat.
I’ll be keeping an eye on it for you.
OTHER NEWS ..
Another tech bro bites the dust? ..Hindenburg Research is a forensic financial research firm that specializes in exposing fraud, accounting irregularities, bad actors, unethical practices, compliance wrongdoing and undisclosed transactions by companies from around the world. It then shorts that company’s stock right as it publishes a report. It has in the past exposed misconduct, information-suppression and/or outright fraud and corruption at, among others, Nikola, Draft Kings, Tether, Adani and Clover Health.
The subject of Hindenberg’s latest report is Block (SQ), whose shares plunged last week after allegations of massive fraud and corruption at the mobile payments provider co-founded by one of the ultimate tech bro pin-ups and annoying libertarian hippie, Jack Dorsey.
Block is tailored to small and medium-sized businesses and individuals with limited access to banking services. The company’s signature apps include Square (the original name of the firm and origin of the SQ ticker symbol) which accepts credit card payments and Cash App, which allows individual users to transfer money.
After a two-year investigation of the company’s practices, Hindenburg concluded that, primarily based on information received from former employees, somewhere up to 75% of Block accounts are either fake, used to commit fraud and/or are duplicate accounts tied to just one person.
Block’s initial success came not from disruptive innovation, but from its “willingness to facilitate fraud against consumers and the government, avoid regulation, dress up predatory loans and fees as ‘revolutionary technology’ and mislead investors with inflated metrics.”
According to the report, Block also skirted regulatory requirements in what it has described as a “Wild West” approach to compliance, fully enabling “bad actors to mass-create accounts for identity fraud and other scams” .
Hindenberg Research additionally revealed that co-founders Dorsey and James McKelvey collectively sold over $1 billion of the stock as the price rocketed during the pandemic before embarking on an epic 80% crash in October 2021. The company was also apparently guilty of deliberately misappropriating (otherwise known as stealing from the taxpayer) COVID relief funds by knowingly using the fake, fraudulent and duplicate accounts as a basis for the Federal handouts.
Not a good week for celeb crypto shillers .. Lindsay Lohan, Jake Paul, Soulja Boy, Lil Yachty, Austin Mahone, Kenda Lust, Neo-Yo and Akon were all charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with illegally touting Justin Sun’s broken crypto coins Tronix (TRX) and BitTorrent (BTT) and failing to disclose that they were paid to do so. Only Soulja Boy and Austin Mahone even bothered to dispute the charges, the rest all settled with authorities right away.
And good news from Montenegro, where fugitive con-man Do Kwon, the uber-crypto-bro behind the Terra/Luna scam that wiped out an estimated $40 billion from crypto markets and who famously asserted “I don’t debate the poor” in response to concerns raised about his fraudulent blockchain platform, was finally arrested after months on the run. The US, Singapore and South Korea will now fight it out to determine who provides him with a jail cell for what will likely be a lengthy stretch inside.
Real estate: starting to unfreeze? .. Sales of previously-owned homes rose 14.5% in February compared with January. It was the first monthly gain in twelve months and the largest increase since July 2020, right after the start of the COVID pandemic. However, sales were still 22.6% lower than they were in February 2022.
The median price of an existing home sold in the US in February was $363k, a 0.2% decline from February 2022. This marks the first monthly year-over-year price decline since Tottenham’s finest, Adele, first defied physics and set fire to rain in 2012.
Regionally, prices fell more from a year ago in the West (down 5.6%) and Northeast (down 4.5%), where housing is more expensive. But prices were still climbing from last year in the South (up 2.7%) and the Midwest (up 5%).
UNDER THE HOOD ..
From a technical standpoint the market is in a holding pattern, albeit with a negative bias. Participation and volume on the rally days has recently been surpassed by participation and volume on the declining days, which is not consistent with a renewed advance.
It seems that the market has not sorted out what it wants to do just yet. Prices are right in the middle of a wide range that can be traced back over a year, a kind of technical “no man’s land” . When this is the case, the immediate risk/reward profile is generally not very favorable.
Another measure of investor attitude toward risk can be found in the relative performances of the Mid Cap and Small Cap indexes. Since the early February market high, the relative strength for both indexes collapsed vs. Large Cap, reflecting a severe reduction in the willingness to take on the higher risk associated with these smaller stocks.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Data on the U.S. consumer and housing market, congressional testimony plus a few remaining earnings reports and an investor event will be this week's highlights.
Economic data highlights of the week include Tuesday's Consumer Confidence Index for March and the Personal Income and Expenditures report for February. Housing market data out next week includes the latest Case-Shiller national Home Price Index and Pending Home Sales Index.
On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Chairman Martin Gruenberg are scheduled to testify before the House Financial Services Committee where they will likely face a grilling on the collapses of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank and efforts to maintain confidence in the US banking system.
Earnings reports this week include Walgreens, BioNTech, Lululemon Athletica, Paychex, Micron, Cintas and Carnival. Intel will host an investor event.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.60%, one month ago: 6.13%, one year ago: 4.42%)
Weekly data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 21% (19% a week ago)
↔ Neutral: 30% (32% a week ago) ↔
↓Bearish: 49% (49% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 28 (Bearish by 30 a week ago)
Weekly data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
FEDWATCH TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate) on May 3rd after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 54%, one month ago: 0%)
(one week ago: 21%, one month ago: 70%)
How does the market view the probability that interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 4.875%) will be at/above (≥) the following rates at year-end?
(one week ago: 90%, one month ago: 100%)
(one week ago: 67%, one month ago: 100%)
(one week ago: 34%, one month ago: 100%)
(one week ago: 10%, one month ago: 100%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of market close on Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communications Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 3.0% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Southern Co.) - down 1.6% for the week
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 152 and rose by 10 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is still at 169 and was unchanged over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is right at its 50-day moving average and above its 90-day and its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 14.3% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is now way above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 16.3% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of anticipated stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 3.8 lower at 21.7. It remains just above its 50-day moving average, but is now below its 90-day and its long term trend line.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Stock markets are completely unpredictable, especially over shorter spans. Yet you wouldn’t know that from how many people approach investing, where “good” investments are simply defined as those that just make intuitive sense to them at the time. Maybe you should stop trying to make sense of things.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS
A credit default swap (CDS) is a financial derivative that allows an investor to swap or offset their credit risk with that of another investor. To swap the risk of default, the lender buys a CDS from another investor who agrees to reimburse them if the borrower defaults.
Most CDS contracts are maintained via an ongoing premium payment similar to the regular premiums due on an insurance policy. A lender who is worried about a borrower defaulting on a loan often uses a CDS to offset or swap that risk.
A credit default swap is a derivative contract that transfers the credit exposure of fixed income products. It may involve bonds or forms of securitized debt—derivatives of loans sold to investors.
For example, suppose a company sells a bond with a $100 face value and a 10-year maturity to an investor. The company might agree to pay back the $100 at the end of the 10-year period with regular interest payments throughout the bond's life.
Because the debt issuer cannot guarantee that it will be able to repay the premium, the investor assumes the risk. The debt buyer can purchase a CDS to transfer the risk to another investor, who agrees to pay them in the event the debt issuer defaults on its obligation.
Debt securities often have longer terms to maturity, making it harder for investors to estimate the investment risk. For instance, a mortgage can have terms of 30 years. There is no way to tell whether the borrower will be able to continue making payments that long.
That's why these contracts are a popular way to manage risk. The CDS buyer pays the CDS seller until the contract's maturity date. In return, the CDS seller agrees that it will pay the CDS buyer the security's value as well as all interest payments that would have been paid between that time and the maturity date if there is a credit event.
The credit event is a trigger that causes the CDS buyer to settle the contract. Credit events are agreed upon when the CDS is purchased and are part of the contract. The majority of single-name CDSs are traded with the following credit events as triggers:
Reference entity default other than failure to pay: An event where the issuing entity defaults for a reason that is not a failure to pay
Failure to pay: The reference entity fails to make payments
Obligation acceleration: When contract obligations are moved, such as when the issuer needs to pay debts earlier than anticipated
Repudiation: A dispute in the contract validity
Moratorium: A suspension of the contract until the issues that led to the suspension are resolved
Obligation restructuring: When the underlying loans are restructured
Government intervention: Actions taken by the government that affect the contract
CDSs are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under the Dodd-Frank Act.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
A week following three major US bank failures that then saw two other banks sail very close to the wind ended with stock markets higher, the S&P 500 was up 1.4% for the week and the NASDAQ closed 4.4% higher. Anyone who claims they can correctly predict this stuff is such a liar.
Monday was the largest trading volume day so far this year on US exchanges (a record that lasted until Friday, when it was surpassed) and saw a bloodbath for shares of many regional banks on the back of the failures of Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank amid fears of financial contagion (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below).
These types of institutions are more reliant on net interest income (the difference between what they borrow and lend for) than larger Wall Street institutions which have additional diversified revenue sources including investment banking, trading, and wealth management.
None fared worse than First Republic Bank (FRC), whose stock plunged almost 70% on Monday before rallying back later in the week after it got assurances of some protection from the regulators and financial propping-up from its Wall Street banking pals like JP Morgan and Wells Fargo. It then slumped again on Friday after the bank announced that its dividends were a thing of the past.
For the third week running, there were extraordinary shifts in the market’s perception of what the Fed will do at this week’s March 22nd meeting, the idea being that in such a jumpy environment the Fed could not risk jacking rates up very far, if at all.
Indeed, there was a feeling that this turmoil could be the Fed's "get out of jail free" card, meaning that the banking crisis gives it the perfect cover to scale back or even pause its rate hikes, maintaining credibility in doing so by citing uncertainty in the banking sector as the “legitimate” reason.
This idea that the fallout from the crisis might help do the Fed’s job for it pushed non-financial stocks considerably higher for much of Monday’s trading session as, once again, the stock market priced in imminent Fed pivots and pauses having just got burned by doing exactly this literally only a month ago.
Interest rates on 2 year and 10 year Treasury bonds, which should be boring but have been acting like crazy biotech stocks lately, slumped hard, driving bond prices higher. The 2 year fell from above 5.0% to 4.0% in just three trading sessions. The technical term for this is; a friggin’ massive move - not seen since The Bangles were first advising us all to walk like an Egyptian in 1987.
As you will have seen in last week’s report, the futures market-based probability of a half percent hike by the Fed this Wednesday ended the previous week at 68%. By Monday evening, that probability was priced at .. zero,where it remained all week.
The likelihood of no change at all in rates being announced this week, priced at zero for months now, ended last week at 38% (Goldman Sachs analysts even came right out and said it - they think the Fed will leave rates unchanged as a result of what is happening in the financial sector). The remaining 62% probability said that a quarter of a point rise was on the cards.
The market has now priced in large interest rate cuts by year-end, with the probability of rates being lower than the current 4.625% now at 99%, and a two-in-three chance that rates will be below 4.00% on New Year’s Eve. This turnaround is quite astonishing when you look at the comparisons of where these probabilities were just a week ago and a month ago (see FEDWATCH TOOL below).
Before the market open last Tuesday morning we learned that, in the twelve months through February, the overall Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation rose 6.0%, compared to 6.4% the previous month. The January to February monthly rise was 0.4%. The year-on-year Core CPI rate, which excludes more volatile food and energy costs, was 5.5%, down a touch from the prior month. These readings were all broadly in line with expectations and supported a narrative that, while inflation is still a problem and the 2.0% Fed target remains pretty far away, the overall trajectory is still disinflationary - even if it is not as steep as the Fed would like.
This was broadly confirmed by the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers which came out the next day better than expected.
The market’s reaction to the CPI report dovetailed with the emerging lower or even no rate hike expectations as well as with an exhale when it came to assessing bank contagion risk and this all drove all stock prices nicely higher on Tuesday.
Fears that another shoe was dropping, however, emerged on Wednesday when shares of troubled Swiss bank Credit Suisse (CS) fell over 27% in pre-market trading amid reports that its Saudi sugar daddy had ruled out any further financial assistance. Now anyone even half-paying attention knows that Credit Suisse has been a dead bank walking for months now (it’s even been previously mentioned in this very publication).
Quite why everyone was acting so shocked on Wednesday that a crap $2 to $3 stock of an institution already shown to have been involved in facilitating international drug dealing, global espionage, malicious and deliberate data leaks of client information, government corruption in Africa, complicity with fraudulent billionaires and hedge funds and more, became even crappier is a bit of a mystery to me but regardless, the previous day’s stock market gains were swiftly vaporized.
The schizophrenic feel continued for the rest of the week. Thursday saw markets move solidly back higher again as Switzerland announced that it would essentially backstop Credit Suisse and the Zero/Small-Rate-Hike narrative re-emerged.
Friday was always going to be wild as it was one of the four“triple-witching days” that happen each year, when individual stock options, stock index options and stock index futures contracts all expire on the same day leading to significant position covering. Kerosene was thrown on the fire by something of a re-examination by investors of what had initially been thought to be the “good” First Republic and Credit Suisse news from the day before and another pretty substantial down day was the result.
All eyes now turn to Wednesday afternoon and the Fed’s interest rate decision and Jerome Powell’s associated press conference and, for the first time in a long time, it’s actually a little unclear which way they will go. I’m on Team Quarter-Of-A-Point-Rise right now, but we will have to get through the rest of this weekend plus two more days of banking sector news narratives before we learn the outcome.
It’ll be an interesting week. I suggest strapping in.
OTHER NEWS .. Banking Crisis Edition (kind of an Op-Ed, I’m afraid)
This is absolutely NOT 2008 .. There is far too much irritating, lazy media comparison between now and 2008 when it comes the events of the last week or two. While you expect this from clueless simpletons on FinTok and Instagram, I’ve also seen it on more respectable outlets that should know much better.
The biggest difference (of many!) between 2008 and now is that fifteen years ago, the assets held at the troubled banks (mortgages on homes) were hopelessly underwater. The home values were way below the value of the mortgages owned, which created massive losses and colossal solvency issues.
Today, the assets held at the troubled banks are US government Treasury bonds which are still worth exactly what banks paid for them (par value) as long as they don’t have to be sold in distress. This makes what we are seeing today a liquidity issue, not a solvency issue. In the grand scheme of things, liquidity issues can be overcome. Solvency issues cannot.
We know from the evidence placed before our eyes over recent months and years that the tech sector, and more especially the crypto-adjacent part, is systemically infused with greed and - in many cases - outright fraudulent and criminal activity. What is emerging from the Silicon Valley Bank debacle is not so much greed or fraud, however, as much as just sheer financial incompetence and a complete lack of understanding about the very basics of risk management on the part of senior executives.
You’d think that now would be a good time for tech bosses and VC bros to be a bit humble - grateful even, but at the very least to simply STFU. Alas .. I strongly support the general principle of always keeping bank depositors completely whole (even beyond the $250k FDIC limit) through insurance in the case of a bank failure (you shouldn’t need to have forensic accounting skills when choosing where to open your checking account) while simultaneously standing back and watching the equity and bondholders get wiped out. Sorry guys, that’s the game. I commend the authorities for how they handled things last weekend.
On the other hand, I also strongly agree with the sentiments expressed in this article that these events are emblematic of a venture-capital apparatus that is too unstable, too risky and filled with people who are too detached from reality to be left in entirely charge of something as important as the direction of the country’s technological development. This was clearly demonstrated by the frantic, squealing tantrums thrown by tech and VC executives that polluted social media all last week as their primary-residence ivory tower located in downtown Fantasy-Land was suddenly shaken by the tremors of “the situation”. I challenge you to read that article and not get angry at the self-absorbed hypocrisy of these people.
Free-market libertarians, all panic-begging for a bailout (thanks to Barry Ritholtz’s great piece for that gem). Pathetic and embarrassing.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Recent weeks have brought an accumulation of technical evidence reaffirming the dominant, long term market downtrend. Intermediate and long term market momentum measures started flashing warning signs in mid to late February. preferred
The important measure of the Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Week Moving Averages plummeted from a multi-year high of 83% on February 2nd, to 53% by March 9th and just 45% on March 16th. This means that the majority of stocks have now returned to their longer term downtrends.
Another disturbing data point is that even the most beaten-down stocks (those the furthest below their moving averages) have been getting sold off. This is not a good sign. In preferable market conditions, you’d expect these stocks to start flickering positively.
Selling Pressure is consolidating its dominance over Buying Power (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS, below). This is an additional indication of a more sustainable price trend, implying that a further intermediate-term market decline is likely.
A month or so ago, there were a decent number of technical indicators that were supportive of a turnaround and even the possible end in sight of the bear market. Unfortunately, it’s hard to find any of them still left in place and it is becoming more and more difficult to avoid the conclusion that the green of the headline indexes last week is masking a worrying deterioration of the technical condition under the surface of the stock market as a whole.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The absolute main event this week is the Federal Open Market Committee which concludes a two-day meeting on Wednesday afternoon, with an interest rate decision due at 2pm ET. Chair Jerome Powell will hold a press conference 30 minutes later. As of Friday, odds were leaning toward a quarter-point hike (see FEDWATCH TOOL Below). Central-bank watchers will also be gazing across the pond awaiting an interest rate decision from the Bank of England on Thursday.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen will testify before Congressional subcommittees on Wednesday and Thursday. She's expected to discuss the recent turmoil in banks, President Biden’s fiscal-2024 budget proposal, and the latest on the U.S. debt ceiling.
There are still a few companies left to report Q4 2022 earnings, including Nike, Adobe, Nvidia, Chevron, Accenture, General Mills, Chewy and Altria.
Amid heightened government scrutiny of TikTok, CEO Shou Zi Chew will testify before Congress next week.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.73%, one month ago: 6.32%, one year ago: 4.16%)
Weekly data courtesy of: FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 19% (25% a week ago)
→Neutral: 32% (33% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 49% (42% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 30 (Bearish by 17 a week ago)
Weekly data courtesy of: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
FEDWATCH TOOL ..
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate) on March 22nd after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 0%)
(one week ago: 32%, one month ago: 82%)
(one week ago: 68%, one month ago: 18%)
How does the market view the probability that interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 4.625%) will be at/above the following rates at year-end?
(one week ago: 100%, one month ago: 100%)
(one week ago: 99%, one month ago: 99%)
(one week ago: 95%, one month ago: 99%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of market close on Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - up 5.7% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 6.7% for the week
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 142 and rose by 1 point last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 169 and rose by 12 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and also below its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 15.4% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is now back above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also above its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 17.7% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of anticipated stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 0.7 higher at 25.5. It remains above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also above its long term trend line.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
The financial graveyard of history is filled with concentrated investors. New plots were just created in that graveyard for Silicon Valley Bank, Silvergate and Signature Bank. A warning that concentration is not your friend when it comes to stocks.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
FINANCIAL CONTAGION
Financial contagion is the spread of an economic crisis from one market or region to another and can occur at domestic and international levels. The contagion can affect goods and services, labor, and capital goods used across markets connected by monetary and financial systems.
The term was first coined during the 1997 Asian financial markets crisis. The real and nominal interconnections of markets can propagate and even magnify economic shocks, likening the effect to the spread of disease like a contagion.
Financial contagion is defined as a shock that initially affects a few financial institutions and spreads to the rest of the financial system, commonly infecting the economies of other countries. Contagions are typically associated with the diffusion of crises throughout a market, asset class, or geographic region. A similar effect can occur with economic booms. The phenomenon of financial contagion has implications for portfolio management, trading, hedging, and diversification strategies.
Markets in a domestic and global economy are interconnected. From the consumer side, many consumer goods are substitutes or complement one another. From the producer side, the inputs for any business can be substitutes and complements for one another, and the labor and capital that a business requires may be used in different types of industries and markets.
Economies rely on financial institutions to facilitate the flow of goods and services through the economy. Any instability that occurs in these entities can spread throughout countries via the balance sheets of financial intermediaries. Damage to the balance sheet of a bank or leveraged financial institution can trigger a selloff of assets or a recall of cross-country loans.
When markets are fragile, a strong negative shock in one market can not only cause that market to fail but spread damage to other markets and, perhaps, the entire economy. Markets that depend on debt, a specific commodity, or where conditions prevent the smooth adjustment of prices and quantities, entry and exit of participants, and adjustments to business models or operations will be more fragile and less flexible.
With increased global lending through cross-border loans, there is economic efficiency and growth but a higher risk of contagion. Short maturities of bank debt further increase vulnerability. Countries with better-capitalized banking systems that finance credit to a larger degree by deposits have proven less vulnerable to contagion.
The 1997 Asian financial markets crisis, the Great Depression, the financial crisis of 2007-2008, and the COVID-19 pandemic are examples of the effects of financial contagion in an economically integrated global economy.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision or action. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions or actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making any use of any information provided therein.
Clients of, and those associated with, Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
New features in the report (see below):
Weekly updates on the latest official average 30 year fixed mortgage rate with comps going back one week, one month and one year
FedWatch Tool information: What the latest important market expectations are on interest rates with comps going back one week and one month
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell basically killed risk appetite on Tuesday with a change of tone on inflation in remarks before the Senate Banking Committee. Not for the first time, he contradicted previous statements he has made recently, stating that the central bank may now have to both speed up the pace and increase the size of interest rate hikes in order to get inflation in check. Powell also told the panel the “ultimate level of interest rates is likely to be higher than previously anticipated”.
JP’s comments to Congress sent stock prices crashing and drove the interest rate yield on the two-year Treasury note up above 5% for the first time since Fergie took the rather debatable position that girls don’t cry in 2007 and the ten-year rate pushed right up against 4%. That differential between those two rates shifted to the steepest it has been in over 40 years.
On the other hand, did Powell really say anything so controversial or unexpected? I don’t think so. His tone change was entirely predictable given that recent economic data and earnings reports/guidance is completely inconsistent with inflation heading back to the Fed’s target of 2% anytime soon. He didn’t really say anything that should have come as a total shock to anyone, let alone market professionals; potential peak interest rates of now around 5.6% and now a very meaningful possibility of a half a point rate rise at the next Fed meeting (see below).
He even made a bit of a lukewarm attempt to partly take the edge off Tuesday’s comments by stating on Wednesday, in reference to the possibility of a 0.50% hike later this month instead of 0.25%, that “I stress that no decision has yet been made on this".
Once again, the constantly over-exuberant stock market was caught offside by such remarks. The sharply negative immediate stock and bond market reaction on Tuesday was really a result of the final evaporation of January’s excessive optimism that had been brought about by a now-discredited fantasy about pivots and pauses that the market had spun for itself.
When the Jobs Report finally came out pre-market on Friday morning, it showed the creation of an additional 311k jobs in February, vs the expected number of 215k. There was a downward revision of January’s shock blockbuster number of $517k as expected, but only by 13k, although December’s number was also revised down, from 260k to 239k. However, the unemployment rate unexpectedly bumped up to 3.6% from the half-century lows of 3.4%, as layoffs ticked up and more workers re-entered the workforce. Average hourly earnings only rise slightly and below expectations.
This was initially viewed as a “hot, but not too hot” report and the negative stock market reaction was relatively muted to yet another huge rise in jobs filled (but still about 180k less than the previous month), but a surprise increase in the unemployment rate. Both two and ten year Treasury interest rates actually eased lower from their highs earlier in the week after the report came out.
What pushed the market down hard on Friday afternoon was not really a reaction to the Jobs Report, which was quickly overshadowed by banking sector fears brought about by high profile bank failures, which I go into deeper below in OTHER NEWS .. Crypto and tech banking woes edition.
The market probability of the Fed raising interest rates by a half percent at its next meeting ending on March 22nd instead of the originally highly-expected quarter percent initially exploded right after Powell’s comments on Tuesday from 31% to 72% according to the CME FedWatch tool. It fell back a bit to close the week at 68% but a 0.50% rise in rates next time out is now very much a majority opinion and a huge rise in likelihood from a month ago when its probability reading was just 9%.
By the way, it is becoming increasingly clear that the CME FedWatch tool data (which I now include in this report every week, see below) is just about the most important source of information out there right now when it comes to trying to figure out crucial information about what financial markets are really thinking about interest rates and how traders are positioning themselves.
This year is going to be all about economic growth, and if that rolls over, so will the stock market. Stocks may have proven themselves resilient to more than previously-expected rate hikes, but I remain concerned they will not be immune to the eventual impact of these rate hikes. Put more plainly, stocks may have already discounted somewhat higher interest rates, but they have not fully discounted the effects of a recession that higher-for-longer interest rates might unleash upon the economy.
Beyond growth, the other massive red flag will be if the Fed indicates that it will raise rates substantially above the latest 5.6-ish% market estimate for peak (terminal) interest rates. For practical purposes, I now believe that means 6.0% or higher. If the Fed signals that’s where the Fed Funds rate is going, that will hit stocks, very possibly hard enough to test the October 2022 lows.
The market does not yet believe that we are even close to a world with a 6.0% Fed Funds rate in it (see FedWatch tool, below), but sentiment can change very fast as we have seen lately. Keep a close eye on that FedWatch tool.
OTHER NEWS .. Crypto and tech banking woes edition
The worlds of crypto, Silicon Valley tech and venture capital were all rocked last week when two of the biggest supporting pillars of their universes crumbled to dust.
First, as anticipated in last week’s Angles report, Silvergate Capital (SI), the San Diego-based crypto bank under investigation by regulators, shut itself down, sending even more tremors through an industry that’s been on edge since the collapse of FTX in November last year.
In an eye-rolling example of annoying corporate-speak, the biggest provider of banking, money transfer and exchange services to the entire crypto ecosystem, said in a statement; “In light of recent industry and regulatory developments, Silvergate believes that an orderly wind down of bank operations and a voluntary liquidation of the bank is the best path forward”.
Silvergate’s ties to disgraced Sam Bankman-Fried and his collapsed crypto exchange FTX and hedge fund Alameda Research may be one of the motivations behind the investigations. The firm also announced on its website that it would immediately discontinue its operation of the Silvergate Exchange Network.
Then on Thursday, SVB Financial Group (SIVB), the parent of Silicon Valley Bank, reported that colossal client outflows from the bank had resulted in forced asset sales at huge losses and the stock duly plunged over 60% in a matter of hours.
The so-called “backbone” of tech start-ups and venture capital firms everywhere, but particularly in the Bay Area of San Francisco, made its final journey to the scrap heap on Friday morning when the NASDAQ exchange confirmed the halting of trading in the stock and hours later California state regulators seized control of the wreckage, triggering FDIC insurance payouts to depositors (but limited to $250k each). This is the biggest bank failure since Washington Mutual back in 2008.
With Silvergate and Silicon Valley Bank the latest to fall into the black hole that has already sucked in so many crypto and crypto-adjacent players, fears about contagion within the banking sector rocketed - with early concerns focused on First Republic Bank (FRC), Signature Bank (SBNY), Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB), Truist Financial Corp (TFC) and KeyCorp (KEY), mostly bankers to the high net worth community (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) and with a track record of embracing the crypto eco-system.
The specter of aggressive short sellers sharpening their claws in relation to the stocks of some of these firms probably sent shivers down spines in their boardrooms.
Rather ominously, almost all banking stocks tumbled in “sell now, ask questions later” sympathy with the SIVB news on Thursday and then again in many cases on Friday as well. Many smaller regional banks got hammered even harder than their bigger cousins.
Charles Schwab (SCHW) lost almost a quarter of its value last week, although this appeared to more related to major insider selling of the stock rather than any direct SIVB fallout.
Obviously mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs) that focus heavily or exclusively on the financial sector and have the likes of SI, SIVB, FRC, SBNY, FITB, TFC, KEY, SCHW etc. as major holdings have got badly hurt.
There are now growing fears about the ability of major “stablecoins” Dai and USDC, operated by Circle Internet Financial, to maintain their essential 1-1 pegs to the dollar given their likely exposure to Silicon Valley Bank.
Unsurprisingly, cryptocurrency prices collapsed in response to all this.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
It’s always somewhat significant when Lowry’s Buying Power and Selling Pressure cross over as they did last week when Selling Pressure moved back into a dominant position over Buying Power for the first time since the end of 2022.
Another significant technical milestone reached last week was the S&P 500 moving back down below all of its important moving averages, the 50 day, the 90 day and its long term trend line, which now all change from being support levels in a falling market to resistance levels in the case of any rebound.
One possible silver lining may be that much of last week’s price deterioration was news-driven (Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank etc.) and news-driven moves tend to be much less sticky than those driven by fundamental shifts in market conditions.
A decent number (but not all) of the technical indicators that have been supportive of a resurgence in stock prices are beginning to break down under pressure from recent meaningful price declines. In other words, a number of the reasons why the market appeared to be healing in January are in the process of being erased.
Volatility, it seems, is back.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
While the fallout from last week’s banking shocks are sure to remain in focus this week (including more clarity on exactly which companies had Silicon Valley Bank deposits that far exceeded FDIC insurance), attention will turn back to inflation on Tuesday before the market opens, when the huge matter of the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation is released.
The expectation is that February CPI will show an increase of 6.0% year-on-year, compared with 6.4% in January. The Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, is expected to rise 5.5% year-on-year, fractionally less than last time.
A few stragglers such as Adobe, Fedex, Lennar and Dollar General will report Q4 2022 results as the latest earnings season draws to a close.
On Friday, the University of Michigan releases its latest Consumer Sentiment Index. Forecasts call for a 67.4 reading which would be the highest in more than a year.
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED RATE MORTGAGE ..
(one week ago: 6.65%, one month ago: 6.12%, one year ago: 3.85%)
Weekly data courtesy of FRED Economic Data, St. Louis Fed as of Thursday of last week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 25% (23% a week ago)
→Neutral: 33% (32% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 42% (45% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 17 (Bearish by 22 a week ago)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
FEDWATCH TOOL ..
How does the market view the probability that interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 4.625%) will be at/above the following rates at year-end?
(one week ago: 99%-1%, one month ago: 81%-19%)
(one week ago: 93%-7%, one month ago: 47%-53%)
(one week ago: 69%-31%, one month ago: 15%-85%)
(one week ago: 31%-69%, one month ago: 2%-98%)
(one week ago: 7%-93%, one month ago: 0%-100%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate) on March 22nd after its next meeting?
(one week ago: 69%, one month ago: 91%)
(one week ago: 31%, one month ago: 9%)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of market close on Friday.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Pepsico) - down 2.0% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Financials (two biggest holdings: Berkshire Hathaway, JP Morgan Chase) - down 8.3% for the week
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 141 and fell by 21 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 157 and rose by 21 points over the course of the week. Selling Pressure last week moved back into a dominant position over Buying Power.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, fell back below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and also fell below its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 16.4% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, fell back below its 50-day moving average but remains just above its 90-day. It also fell back below its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 22.2% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of anticipated stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 3.1 higher at 24.8. It is now above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and last week moved above its long term trend line for the first time since October of last year.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
If you’re looking to build wealth and financial stability, diversifying your streams of income can be a powerful strategy. By generating multiple sources of revenue, you can reduce your reliance on any single income stream and increase your earning potential over time. This article by Nick Magiulli explores seven different streams of income that can help achieve financial independence and build long-term wealth.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
HIGH NET WORTH
The term “high-net-worth individual” (HWNI) refers to a financial industry classification denoting an individual with liquid assets above a certain figure. People who fall into this category generally have at least $1 million in liquid financial assets.
The assets held by high-net-worth individuals are usually easily liquidated and would include things like their primary residence or fine art. HNWIs often seek the assistance of financial professionals in order to manage their money. Their high net worth often qualifies these individuals for additional benefits and opportunities.
Individuals are measured by their net worth in the financial industry. Although there is no precise definition of how wealthy someone must be to fit into this category, high net worth is generally quoted in terms of having liquid assets of a particular number.
The exact amount differs by financial institution and region but usually refers to people with a net wealth of seven figures or more. As noted above, people who fall into this category have more than $1 million in liquid assets, including cash and cash equivalents. These assets do not include things like personal assets and property such as primary residences, collectibles, and consumer durables.
HNWIs are in high demand by private wealth managers. The more money a person has, the more work it takes to maintain and preserve those assets. These individuals generally demand (and can justify) personalized services in investment management, estate planning, tax planning, and so on.
As such, a high-net-worth individual classification generally qualifies people for separately managed investment accounts instead of regular mutual funds. This is where the fact that different financial institutions maintain varying standards for HNWI classification comes into play. Most banks require that a customer have a certain amount in liquid assets and/or a certain amount in depository accounts with the bank to qualify for special HNWI treatment.
HNWIs are also given more benefits than those whose net worth falls under $1 million. They may qualify for:
Services with reduced fees
Discounts and special rates
Access to special events
As a high-net-worth individual (HNWI), you may qualify for banking, investment, and other financial services with reduced fees, discounts, and special rates, along with access to special events or perks. Some financial institutions may offer you personalized services in investment management, estate planning, and tax planning, among other things. Your wealth may also allow you to take part in initial public offerings (IPOs) and invest in startups that demonstrate financial potential.
HNWIs may, too, be able to invest in hedge funds, which are generally only open to accredited investors who meet certain criteria, including a minimum net worth requirement. HNWIs may also have access to private equity (PE) and venture capital (VC) funds, which are typically not available to the general public. Additionally, HNWIs may be able to invest in real estate and other alternative assets that are not as easily accessible to the general public.
These benefits and opportunities may vary depending on the financial institution and region.
Almost 63% of the world's HNWI population lives in the United States, Japan, Germany, and China, according to the Cap Gemini World Wealth Report. The US had about 7.5 million HNWIs in 2021.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of any information provided therein.
Clients and those associated with Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
February delivered a reality check to investors after a giddy January; the S&P 500 fell 2.6% for the month and the NASDAQ dropped 1.1%.
Stock and bond prices had risen impressively in January on the ideas that i) Inflation was declining, ie., disinflation, ii) the Fed was almost done with rate hikes and iii) there wasn’t going be a hard economic landing (ie., we were going to get inflation conquered without a recession). At least two of those three ideas are now pretty much considered off the table right now as a result of the data of the past three weeks. That’s why stocks gave back more than half of 2023’s gains.
Since the start of this interest rate hiking cycle a year ago, the market has proved to be consistently over-enthusiastic in pricing in an end to Fed rate rises, taking any hint of a drop in inflation or slowing growth and extrapolating it out to be some catalyst that will cause the Fed to back off.
That expectation has been proved wrong every single time so far and my default position is to remain rather skeptical of these rallies (even if the stock market isn’t) until we see more tangible progress on persistent disinflation, a gently cooling economy and - most importantly - a clear and believable expression from the Fed that an end to interest rate increases is imminent. We certainly aren’t there yet.
Analyst talk last week revolved around the often-dangerous idea of TTID (“This Time It’s Different”). The thinking goes that the consequences of the COVID pandemic permanently transformed the economic landscape and that the Fed may be applying olden timey rules to a new, altered economy by assuming that it could accomplish all it wants simply by raising interest rates to beat off inflation. This is what has caused the professional forecasting community to be almost continually wrong since the beginning of 2020 about the the path of the US economy, the level and duration of inflation and the direction of interest rate policy.
For example, the TTID narrative goes, the vast majority of existing homeowners aren’t going to change their spending (and therefore their contribution to the inflation rate) as the Fed raises interest rates, since they have a 30-year fixed mortgage, likely refinanced around 3% or less and don’t care what a new mortgage costs. Many households have been flush with COVID stimulus money and did not necessarily respond as the dusty old economic textbooks from the 1950s say they should have done to a rising rate environment.
If the TTID truthers are correct, it could be that in order to accomplish their stated goal of bringing inflation back down towards 2% again, recent economic strength and these new debt dynamics could mean the Fed has to work even harder, tightening policy even more harshly and for longer at a level that is absolutely not yet priced in to stocks with the S&P 500 around 4000.
Having said all that, markets ended last week higher as focus shifted temporarily at least from inflation and interest rate concerns to corporate news and earnings reports, which were mixed but generally on the positive side.
Target (TGT) reported better-than-expected earnings, but future guidance was set lower. The retail firm, considered a good proxy for the retail sector as a whole, provided a bright outlook for the overall industry as it said that inventory issues were improving, contracting 3% year-over-year in Q4 2022. However, it also reiterated that the environment remains challenging and that pre-pandemic operating margins are not likely to be recognized before fiscal year 2024 at the earliest.
Last week’s Fed-speak was a little confusing and contradictory. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston President Susan Collins said interest rates must move quickly higher and remain restrictive for some time to bring inflation growth back under control. But at the same time, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta President Raphael Bostic said he favors using smaller interest rate adjustments (read: 0.25% at a time) to fine-tune monetary policy and thinks rate hikes could well pause by mid-summer.
Nevertheless, the futures market is showing a quite extraordinary about-turn in professional sentiment about what is going to happen to interest rates (see FEDWATCH TOOL, below) and it doesn’t make pleasant reading for those who like to roll the dice on owning low/no-profit young tech or communications sector growth names for whom higher interest rates are kryptonite.
The odds of a half-percent hike instead of a quarter at the next Fed meeting later this month continue to rise, now reaching 31%, from literally 0% a month ago. Fedwatch also shows that there is basically no-one left who thinks interest rates will be below 5% at the end of the year compared to a 90% perceived chance of this just a month ago.
The probability of rates being at or above 5.25% on New Year’s Eve 2023 is now almost 70%. A month ago, that probability was priced at less than 1%.
OTHER NEWS ..
Closing the Silvergate? .. Incredible scenes last week at the top crypto bank Silvergate (SI), the biggest platform used by cryptocurrency holders to make transfers, which said it was “postponing” the release of its latest annual report and admitted that it was under multiple investigations by the Justice Department. As a result, key partners like Coinbase, Galaxy, Paxos and other crypto firms (hardly Hall of Famers themselves when it comes to good behavior, stability and transparency) decided to stop accepting or initiating Silvergate payments.
The share price plummeted 60% on Thursday alone to a record low of below $6.00 (that’s down over 97% from the high it made near the end of 2021) after the company essentially questioned its own viability, pretty much waving the white flag.
Silvergate reported a $1 billion loss for Q4 2022 and said it expects to record massive further losses related to its securities portfolio after selling additional debt to cover withdrawals. The bank still holds more than $11 billion of client money.
Short sellers and analysts have been banging on ages about the enormous risks associated with almost all of Silvergate’s client base being unregulated entities, often incompetently run and exposed recently in many cases as being involved in fraud and criminal activity. The rest of the world seems to have finally caught up.
Analysts all over Wall Street slashed their ratings on Silvergate and Morgan Stanley, which had had a sell rating on the stock, even removed its price target entirely, citing the “high level of uncertainty” around the firm.
This looks like an old-fashioned “run on the bank” (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK, below) and these always end in tears.
This was accompanied by worrying concerns about Tether expressed in a Wall Street Journal exposé last week and on the back of release of the fascinating investigative podcast, Real Money. Tether is the company behind the largest crypto “stablecoin” that claims (without a great deal of verifiable evidence, it would seem) to hold enough funds to be able to maintain a one-for-one peg to a proper currency such as the US Dollar or the Euro in order to facilitate the buying and selling of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum and the rest.
The whole crypto eco-system feels distinctly unstable right now.
Still falling .. Home prices fell at the end of 2022 as high mortgage rates and concerns about the economy impacted the real estate market. The National Home Price Index showed home prices fell 0.3% in December after seasonal adjustment, and were up 5.8% from a year ago. It was the sixth consecutive month of declines, putting the index 4.4% below its June peak. Prices dropped in all of the 20 cities analyzed by S&P, falling by a median of 1.1%.
On an annualized basis, the cities with the biggest price gains are Miami (+15.9%), Tampa (+13.9%), and Atlanta (+10.4%). Prices fell over the last twelve months in San Francisco (-4.2%) and Seattle (-1.8%).
Mortgage rates rose for the fourth week in a row, dampening the optimism from earlier this year that housing affordability was improving. The average rate on a 30-year, fixed-rate conforming home loan (up to $726,200) was 6.65%, up from 6.5% last week and the highest it's been since early November. Buyers of a median-priced home now have a $2,132 average monthly mortgage payment, a 49% jump from last year.
Entering 2023, borrowing costs decreased with expectations of slower economic growth, lower inflation and easing of Fed monetary policy. However, those haven't happened, and mortgage rates have reversed course. The lower rates in January had brought some buyers back into the market, but that effect already seems to be wearing off.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
A break below 3900 in the S&P 500 would see the index have bearishly crossed five of the seven most widely followed momentum signal levels. That's a lot of jargon to explain that the chart is saying that there's likely to be more downside in store for the S&P 500 if it falls below roughly 3900. Although it closed on Friday at 4045, the index was as low as 3951 at one point last week.
With the obstacle of the overbought conditions lingering from the strong stock market advance early in the year now pretty much dissipated, the ball is back in the court of the buyers. The recent pullback was orderly enough not to significantly damage all of the improved medium and long term technical indicators which pointed to further price gains, but we need to closely watch what happens from here.
An example is the important key indicator of the Percent of Stocks Above Their 30 Week Moving Averages, which is still above the important 75% level that is consistent with a bullish long term stance, but only just.
The recent upward trend line in Lowry’s Buying Power (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS, below) was broken last week and the recent downward trend line in Selling Pressure is also no longer in place. This is a cause for concern for the bulls.
Continued or accelerating market deterioration would begin to further chip away at these positive indicators and push the technical narrative to what happened in January as being no more than yet another failed fake rally in the midst of a continuing bear market.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The latest data on the U.S. job market and a few more Q4 2022 earning reports will be next week's highlights.
On Wednesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will release the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS). The consensus estimate is for 10.7 million job openings on the last business day of January, which would be a slight decline from December.
On Friday, we get the important February Jobs Report. The expectation is for a gain of 215k jobs and for the unemployment rate to hold steady at 3.4%. Last time out, the new jobs numbers surprised massively to the upside, causing a major shift in market sentiment that set the tone for the whole of what was a mostly dismal February.
Companies reporting next week will include Oracle, Crowdstrike, Ciena, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Campbell Soup, JD.com and Ulta Beauty.
General Electric will host an investor day on Thursday and Apple will hold its annual shareholders’ meeting on Friday.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 23% (21% a week ago)
→Neutral: 32% (40% a week ago)
↓Bearish: 45% (39% a week ago)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 22 (Bearish by 18 a week ago)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
FEDWATCH TOOL ..
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of market close on Friday:
How does the market view the probability that interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 4.625%) will be at/above or below 5.25% at year-end?
(one week ago: 63%-37%, one month ago: 1%-99%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate) on March 22nd after their next meeting?
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 3%)
(one week ago: 73%, one month ago: 97%)
(one week ago: 27%, one month ago: 0%)
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Air Products & Chemicals) - up 4.20% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor & Gamble, Pepsico) - down 0.3% for the week
The NASDAQ-100 outperformed the S&P 500
Emerging Markets and Foreign Developed Markets had a better week than US Markets
Large Caps, Small Caps and Mid Caps all did about the same
Growth stocks did a little better than Value stocks
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 162 and rose by 5 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 136 and fell by 3 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, rose back above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and remains above its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 12.5% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 19.3% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of anticipated stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 1.6 higher at 21.7. It moved back below its 50-day moving average and is still below its 90-day and its long term trend line.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Contrarian take from MIT onChatGPT and the other AI engines, which may fall far short of what they are cracked up to be. Why trusting them may be a mistake.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
RUN ON THE BANK
A bank run occurs when a large number of customers of a bank or other financial institution withdraw their deposits simultaneously over concerns of the bank's solvency.
As more people withdraw their funds, the probability of default increases, prompting more people to withdraw their deposits. In extreme cases, the bank's reserves may not be sufficient to cover the withdrawals.
Bank runs happen when a large number of people start making withdrawals from banks because they fear the institutions will run out of money. A bank run is typically the result of panic rather than necessarily a true insolvency. A bank run triggered by fear that pushes a bank into actual insolvency represents a classic example of a self-fulfilling prophecy. The bank does risk default, as individuals keeping withdrawing funds. So what begins as panic can eventually turn into a true default situation.
That's because most banks don't keep that much cash on hand in their branches. In fact, most institutions have a set limit to how much they can store in their vaults each day. These limits are set based on need and for security reasons. The Federal Reserve Bank also sets in-house cash limits for institutions. The money they do have on the books is used to loan out to others or is invested in different investment vehicles.
Because banks typically keep only a small percentage of deposits as cash on hand, they must increase their cash position to meet the withdrawal demands of their customers. One method a bank uses to increase cash on hand is to sell off its assets—sometimes at significantly lower prices than if it did not have to sell quickly.
Losses on the sale of assets at lower prices can cause a bank to become insolvent. A bank panic occurs when multiple banks endure runs at the same time.
Bank runs go back as early as the advent of banking, when goldsmiths in Europe during the 15th and 16th centuries would issue paper receipts redeemable for physical gold in excess of the stock that they held. This was an early example of fractional reserve banking, whereby bankers could issue more paper notes redeemable for gold than they held in stock.
The concept was viable since the goldsmiths (and more modern bankers) knew that on any given day, only a small percentage of gold on hand would be demanded for redemption. However, if depositors suddenly demanded their gold deposits all at once, it could spell disaster —and this did happen several times in response to poor harvests or political turmoil.
In modern history, bank runs are often associated with the Great Depression. In the wake of the 1929 stock market crash, American depositors began to panic and seek refuge in holding physical cash. The first bank failure due to mass withdrawals occurred in 1930 in Tennessee. This seemingly minor and isolated incident, however, spurred a string of subsequent bank runs across the South and then the entire country as people heard what happened and sought to withdraw their own deposits before they lost their savings—a herding behavior that only sped up more bank runs via a negative feedback loop.
Rumors began to spread that banks were refusing to give customers back their cash, causing even greater panic and anxiety amongst the public. In December 1930, a New Yorker who was advised by the Bank of United States against selling a particular stock left the branch and promptly began telling people the bank was unwilling or unable to sell his shares. Interpreting this as a sign of insolvency, bank customers lined up by the thousands and, within hours, withdrew over $2 million from the bank.
The succession of bank runs that occurred in the early 1930s represented a domino effect of sorts, as news of one bank failure spooked customers of nearby banks, prompting them to withdraw their money, where a single bank failure in Nashville led to a host of bank runs across the Southeast.
In response to the bank runs of the 1930s, the U.S. government set up several regulatory mechanisms to prevent this from happening again, including establishing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which today insures depositors up to $250,000 per banking institution.
The 2008-09 financial crisis was again met with some notable bank runs. On September 25, 2008, Washington Mutual, the sixth-largest American financial institution at the time, was shut down by the U.S. Office of Thrift Supervision. Over the previous few days, depositors had withdrawn more than $16.7 billion in deposits, causing the bank to run out of short-term cash reserves.
The very next day, Wachovia Bank was also shuttered for similar reasons, when depositors withdrew over $15 billion over a two-week period after Wachovia reported negative earnings results earlier that quarter. Much of the withdrawals at Wachovia were concentrated among commercial accounts with balances above the $100,000 limit insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), drawing those balances down to just below the FDIC limit.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of any information provided therein.
Clients and those associated with Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
For all the different feel of this market in 2023, the price action is revealing that it is actually still broadly behaving much as it did in 2022. It’s still being driven by Fed expectations and those expectations are being determined by earnings and economic data.
In January, the data was mostly better-than-feared and the market developed the view that the Fed was close to ending rate hikes and that end-of-2023 interest rates would actually be lower than they were at the end of 2022. Stocks rallied hard and tech/growth names outperformed, including many of those that were slaughtered in 2022.
Then came that stunning Jobs Report on February 3rd, showing over half a million new jobs created in a month and everything began reversing.
Since then, additional data (notably retail and wholesale inflation and retail sales) has swung the narrative pendulum back the other way. Now the more accepted tale is that the Fed is in fact not close to done hiking and that rates will remain high for a good while even when they do finish raising them. Plus no rate cuts for you in 2023!
This new normal is reflected most obviously in the changing market expectations of interest rates (see FEDWATCH TOOL below to see exactly what I mean). For example, the market now prices interest rates ending the year above 5% as almost a total certainty, when just a month ago this likelihood was priced as a 50/50 toss-up.
Minutes from the Federal Reserve's February meeting released on Wednesday showed that the central bank is still taking things very cautiously with its rate policy, with several committee members pushing to raise interest rates by 0.50% at the meeting rather than the eventually decided-upon 0.25% raise. The Fed clearly continues to believe that inflationary risk outweighs the possibility of raising rates too far/too fast.
The minutes gave no direct indication of what the Fed might do at its next meeting in March but, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch Tool, while a quarter of a percentage point rise in interest rates is still favored as the most likely outcome next month, the futures market now prices the probability of a half a percentage point hike at 27% as compared to only 3% just a month ago.
At around the same time, Walmart (WMT) and Home Depot (HD) both highlighted the same phenomenon in their earnings guidance. Although supply chain problems are mostly abating, American consumers are now spending less on electronics, apparel and home improvements as inflation and evolving spending habits is now hitting demand for many of the more discretionary goods sold in large stores.
Unsurprisingly, the Consumer Cyclical sector, which is made up of the stocks of most of the companies who produce and sell more discretionary-type goods in stores and online, was the worst performing sector last week.
In its second estimate of Q4 2022 Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that the US economy grew at an annual rate of 2.7% - down from the first estimate of 2.9%, compared to projections of 2.5% growth. In Q3 2022, the final estimate had been 3.2%.
The stock market initially seemed dazed and confused in response to all this, wandering around without much purpose, crossing from red to green and back again several times.
What finally seemed to nudge the market in one direction was the release of the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price index. This is the Fed’s preferred gauge of inflation which it uses to guide its interest rate decisions more than any other indicator. That kind of makes it the most important single piece of economic data these days.
We learned that it rose 0.6% in January, more than the expected 0.4% rise and well up from December’s 0.3% increase. The index was up 5.4% from a year ago, accelerating a bit from December’s 5.3% but, more importantly, much higher than the 4.3% rate that had been expected. The Core PCE rate, which excludes more volatile food and energy prices, also climbed by more than estimates. This was a blow for those hoping for a swift pivot in the Fed’s higher interest rate policy.
It finally prompted the markets to make a directional decision and stocks started to accelerate sharply lower to end the holiday-shortened week down 2.7% in the case of the S&P 500 and 3.3% in the case of the NASDAQ.
There was a general sense, however, the market was actually showing a degree of resilience most of the time, with stock prices heading lower but in a somewhat orderly fashion (see UNDER THE HOOD, below, for more on this).
The feeling is that this resilience should stay in place as long as:
1) Economic growth doesn’t roll over hard, and
2) The Fed does not signal that peak interest rates will be substantially above its current 5.1% expectation. Any indication of an expectation of above, say, 5.4% will likely be met by a steeper fall in stock prices and an alarming jump in bond yields.
Interestingly, a number of analysts are starting to express a degree of skepticism around the validity of some of the recent economic data, which has included some remarkably quirky numbers indicating a very strong economy and a stubborn level of both inflation and job creation, owing to unusual seasonal adjustments that may be impacting the results.
If this is indeed the case and there’s something of a walk-back in the revised data which we’ll hear about in the coming weeks, we could see a sharp reversal in the broadly bearish (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK, below) sentiment that first emerged from that “crazy” Jobs Report of February 3rd.
OTHER NEWS ..
Feeling better .. A survey of US consumer sentiment, which helps gauge how Americans feel about their own finances as well as the broader economy, rose in early February to a 13-month high of 67.0, suggesting a somewhat improved level of optimism about the economy. The final reading in February was up from 64.9 in January. This third straight gain pushed the index well above the record low of 50.0 set last summer.
Levels are still far below “normal”, however. The survey’s most recent peak was 88.3 in April 2021. Before the pandemic it topped out around 101.
Nevertheless, Americans think inflation, which is currently running at a twelve month rate of 6.4%, will persist for some time. They expect the inflation rate in the next year to average about 4.1% and 2.9% per year over the long run, still well above the Federal Reserve’s 2.0% target.
Taking off .. With borders now mostly open, some of the airline carriers that were burning through cash a year ago are posting big profits now. British Airways’ parent said last week it was in the black last year for the first time since the pandemic began. Singapore Airlines posted a record net profit for its latest nine month reporting period and Qantas of Australia showed a record pre-tax profit for its latest half-year.
It seems the results are being driven by a combination of pent-up demand and cost-cutting, with a big boost from government funds in some countries. With supplies of seats limited since carriers are still scrambling to hire staff and get planes back in the air, fares are high but passengers have been willing to pay.
Piling up .. Department of Justice attorneys last week added four additional counts to the eight previously made against Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced founder and former CEO of collapsed crypto exchange FTX. The new charges allege that SBF conspired to commit bank fraud and operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business. He also faces more securities and commodities fraud counts.
The newly-unsealed indictment provided a comprehensive account of his conduct, which prosecutors have stated led to a multibillion-dollar fraud. He is said to have stolen client funds to enrich himself and his fellow Bahamian frat house crypto bro pals and to help prop up FTX and its associated crypto investment firm, Alameda Research, run by his ex-girlfriend who has now agreed to testify against him.
The scheme was exposed when a rush of withdrawals from FTX created a liquidity crisis, leading to the firm's bankruptcy and SBF’s removal as CEO. His court-appointed replacement called what occurred at FTX "old-fashioned embezzlement."
SBF has pleaded not guilty to the original set of charges and is currently free on $250 million bond. His trial is set to begin on October 2nd.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The clearly overbought condition of the market that had developed by the end of January made knocking it back down again easier from a technical perspective and short term indicators deteriorated. This was not really that surprising.
What is more interesting, however, is the way that the more medium and longer term technical readings are proving robust in the face of what has been, on the surface at least, a difficult two/three week period for the headline indexes.
The dominance of Buying Power over Selling Pressure still remains in an broadly upward trend and above its moving average. The key longer term reading of the Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Week Moving Average remains at a healthy 68%.
Indeed, the general picture painted by the technical data is of a market moving lower mostly because it was overbought (as shown by the fact that it was the names that had spiked the highest in January which came down the hardest in February, not because of a passionate desire to sell everything.
Should the current dip continue and round-trip the market all the way from overbought to oversold, the eventual positive upwards snap-back could be quite meaningful.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The rump end of Q4 2022 earnings season and a number of economic indicators will be this week's highlights.
With 35-ish companies left to report, average S&P 500 earnings are down more than 3% from the same period a year ago. Target, Costco, Salesforce, Best Buy, Lowe’s, Zoom, Occidental Petroleum, AutoZone, Monster Beverage, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Dollar Tree, Lowe’s, Snowflake, Broadcom, and Kroger all report this week.
Chevron and Goldman Sachs Group will both hold investor days this week and Tesla may unveil a new, cheaper EV model on Wednesday.
Economic data out next week starts includes Durable Goods for January, a decent proxy for business investment. The latest Consumer Confidence Index out next week is expected to continue an upward trend.
The Institute for Supply Management will publish the Purchasing Managers’ Indexes for February this week, both the Manufacturing and Services versions.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
The data flipped back to a bearish tilt after two weeks of bullishness.
↑Bullish: 21% (34% the previous week)
→Neutral: 40% (37% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 39% (29% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 18 (Bullish by 5 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
FEDWATCH TOOL ..
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool. Calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of market close on Friday:
How does the market view the probability that interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 4.625%) will be at/above or below 5.0% at year-end?
(one week ago: 69%-31%, one month ago: 49%-51%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate) on March 22nd after their next meeting?
0% probability of no change
(one week ago: 0%, one month ago: 17%)
73% probability of a 0.25% increase
(one week ago: 85%, one month ago: 80%)
(one week ago: 15%, one month ago: 3%)
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor & Gamble, PepsiCo) - unchanged for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 4.4% for the week
The NASDAQ-100 performed worse than the S&P 500
Emerging Markets underperformed both Foreign Developed Markets and US Markets
Large Cap did a little worse than Small Caps and Mid Caps
Not much difference in the performance of Value or Growth stocks
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 157 and fell by 9 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 139 and rose by 11 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, fell below both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but remains above its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 14.1% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains just above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 21.4% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
VIX, the commonly-accepted measure of anticipated stock market risk and volatility (often referred to as the “fear index”), implied by S&P 500 index option trading, ended the week 1.6 higher at 21.7. It moved above its 50-day moving average but is still below its 90-day and its long term trend line.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Heavily concentrated positions in one single stock, either as the result of employer stock ownership or a strategic choice through stock-picking, decreases long-run wealth-compounding probability and leads to a much higher chance of being wiped out in a catastrophic loss. Bad news bears.
Larry Swedroe explains.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
BULL/BEAR MARKETS.
The terms "bear" and "bull" are often used to describe general actions and attitudes, or sentiment, either of an individual asset or the market as a whole. Investors use the terms "bearish" or "bullish" as a quick way to describe their market sentiment regarding specific securities or financial markets.
A bear market refers to a decline in prices, usually for a few months, in a single security or asset, group of securities, or the securities market as a whole. In contrast, a bull market is when prices are rising. Typically, a move of 20% or more from a recent peak or trough triggers an "official" bear or bull market.
While the terms are relatively simple to understand, the impact either a bull or bear market can have on your portfolio and wealth is undeniable. Both animals are known for their incredible and unpredictable strength, so the image that each evokes in regards to stock market volatility certainly rings true.
Interestingly enough, the actual origins of these expressions are unclear. Here are two of the most frequent explanations given:
The terms "bear" and "bull" are thought to derive from the way in which each animal attacks its opponents. That is, a bull will thrust its horns up into the air, while a bear will swipe down. These actions were then related metaphorically to the movement of a market. If the trend was up, it was considered a bull market. If the trend was down, it was a bear market.
Historically, the middlemen in the sale of bearskins would sell skins they had yet to receive. As such, they would speculate on the future purchase price of these skins from the trappers, hoping they would drop. The trappers would profit from a spread—the difference between the cost price and the selling price. These middlemen became known as "bears," short for bearskin jobbers, and the term stuck for describing a downturn in the market. Conversely, because bears and bulls were widely considered to be opposites due to the once-popular blood sport of bull-and-bear fights, the term bull stands as the opposite of bears.
Even Shakespeare's plays make reference to battles involving bulls and bears. In Macbeth, the ill-fated title character says his enemies have tethered him to a stake but "bear-like, I must fight the course”. In Much Ado About Nothing, the bull is said to be “a savage but noble beast”.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of any information provided therein.
Clients and those associated with Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Those of us hoping for a clearer picture to emerge from the release of the January’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation and other subsequent data were left sorely disappointed last week. If anything, things just became more confused.
Stocks drifted nicely higher on Monday as traders laid their bets ahead of the high-stakes inflation reports that would start arriving the following morning.
When CPI came out pre-market on Tuesday, it showed that consumer prices rose at a more rapid monthly pace in January, interrupting a months-long streak of cooler month-to-month readings. Prices rose 0.5% last month, as what we paid for shelter, food, energy and apparel in particular accelerated at a more rapid pace. In the twelve months through January 2023, inflation was 6.4%, compared to 6.5% in December and above the expectation of 6.2%. Core CPI, which excludes the food and fuel prices, rose by 0.4% in January, unchanged from December’s pace for a slightly lower annualized rate of 5.6%.
Then on Thursday, we learned that the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation felt by manufacturers for January rose 0.7%, more than the expected 0.4% and is up 6% year-over-year, down from the 6.5% rate in December. Excluding food, energy, and trade services, the year-on-year Core PPI was up 4.5%, easing slightly from the month before.
On the surface, the reports looked to be saying that inflation was running mildly hotter. But looking deeper, you can see that a highly disproportionate portion of the retail price gains were attributable to housing. This was initially interpreted as a positive thing, since pricing there tends to react slower than other parts of the economy, meaning already-existing recent rate hikes may have yet to be felt and might not need to be added to. On the wholesale side, the Core PPI number still looks somewhat promising, although it wasn’t quite as warm and fuzzy as it was perhaps expected to be.
Simply put, these numbers tell us that inflation is still declining, but that the pace of that decline is slowing.
In a sign that US consumers are still willing to spend like crazy even as prices and interest rates rise, the Commerce Department's report showed that Retail Sales surprisingly surged 3.0% in January, way above the estimates of a 1.8% increase and almost 3x the rate of increase seen in the normally buoyant month of December.
Paired with the (also quite stunning) recent January jobs report from the Friday before, the retail sales number gave yet another indication that the US economy is proving to be massively more resilient to inflation and interest rate increases than anyone ever expected, which on one hand is great for stocks but on the other hand gives the Fed the green light to just keep on lifting and holding rates until it inflicts some real damage.
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland president Loretta Mester and St. Louis president Jim Bullard both raised eyebrows on Thursday, each separately expressing the opinion that there had been a strong case for a 0.50% hike at the last Fed meeting, rather than the 0.25% that the committee actually went for (neither Mester nor Bullard are voting members of the rate-setting committee any more) and introducing the possibility of a full 0.50% bump in the upcoming March meeting (see my new feature; FEDWATCH TOOL, below). They also both strongly pushed back on the idea of any interest rate cuts this year.
Creaking under the weight of all this mixed economic data and hawkish Fed-speak, the stock market took a day or so to digest it all and then finally decided that it didn’t really like what it saw and headed lower, led by the energy sector which had a bad week.
The interest rate market, however, was much quicker to sour on the data and futures market wagers on where interest rates will be at the end of the year are finally starting to mirror the Fed’s most recent forecasts of above 5%. Just a month ago, this probability was priced at just 2% by the futures market. By the end of last week, it was up to 69% and fast becoming consensus (see my new feature; FEDWATCH TOOL, below). The rebellious teenager from my report of a couple of weeks back is grudgingly starting to listen to the parent.
There was a clear narrative coming into 2023: The Federal Reserve had spent months pushing interest rates rapidly higher at a historic pace in a bid to tame inflation and those moves would slow growth and the labor market so much that the economy would be at risk of plunging into a nasty recession.
The worries about inflation aren't going away. But the growl of a recession is becoming increasingly distant, despite what is being loudly shouted by eight months now of an inverted yield curve, where short term interest rates are higher than long term ones, which is traditionally a strong sign of imminent recession.
Employers added more than half a million jobs in January, the housing market is starting to show some signs of stabilizing or even picking back up, Americans are still spending money like water and many Wall Street economists and analysts have marked down the odds of a harmful recession this year.
After months of asking whether or not the Fed could pull off a “soft landing” (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) in which the economy slows but does not plummet, the trendy new narrative is that there may not be any landing at all, soft or hard, for a few months — that growth will simply hold up until it finally decides to either accelerate or fall off a cliff.
Growth is the critical factor here that is currently propping up the stock market. It needs to stay strong because if stocks have to confront slowing growth alongside interest rates where they are, then risk asset prices will drop, likely very sharply.
OTHER NEWS ..
The strange math of stocks .. If you had bought shares of the troubled online used car retailer Carvana at the start of this year, you’d be up 170% by now. If you had bought them a year ago, even after that 2023 spike, you’d still be down by over 91%.
Trillions .. Americans assumed a record amount of debt at the end of 2022. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s quarterly report on household debt and credit found that in Q4 2022, overall household debt in the US rose by almost $400 billion or 2.4% to $17 trillion (that’s $17,000,000,000,000).
Credit card debt jumped over $60 billion to an all-time high of almost $1 trillion. Mortgage balances grew by a quarter of a trillion dollars to $12 trillion, up almost $1 trillion from 2021. Debt on auto and student loans also increased, lifting total non-housing balances by $126 billion.
The bank noted that the share of current debt becoming delinquent rose again for almost all types of borrowing. That came after two years of historically low delinquencies.
The reason for these increased delinquencies is said to be inflation combined with the Fed’s effort to get it under control. While low unemployment has kept consumer finances generally strong, stubbornly high prices and climbing interest rates are now testing some borrowers’ ability to repay their debts. The Fed added that the data show particular signs of stress among younger borrowers who are starting to miss some credit card and auto loan payments at a much higher rate.
Another bro icon charged with fraud .. Tearful crypto bros will have to take down yet another poster of one of their heroes from their bedroom walls. After having to terminate their man-crush on FTX’s disgraced Sam Bankman Fried, they now have to resign themselves to the realization of what everyone else kinda figured out last year, that Do Kwon was also a lying fraud. The founder of collapsed cryptocurrencies TerraUSD and Luna and his company bilked investors who purchased billions of dollars’ worth of the digital assets, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said.
The SEC filed a civil fraud lawsuit against Do Kwon and Singapore-based Terraform Labs in Manhattan federal court, accusing them of deliberately misrepresenting the risk of TerraUSD and knowingly misleading clients, particularly about how Luna was used in South Korea.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The market has been trading very methodically with the major indexes, notably the S&P 500, tending to gravitate towards and bounce off very round number price levels that comprise many of the options and other derivatives contracts. Case in point, the S&P began the year with a test of almost exactly 3,800 before rallying to 4,000 in early January only to fall back to 3,900 in the middle of the month. From there, the index powered on to push right up to 4,200 before retreating back to bounce around either side of 4,100.
The reason this is noteworthy is that this type of price action is more evident of fast money in-and-out trading, algorithms and execution by options and derivatives traders as opposed to systematic, large-scale organic buying by long-term institutional investors, which is what the market really needs to execute a legit turnaround.
Instead, the primary beneficiaries of the most recent rally have been the beaten-down technology, consumer cyclical, and communication cervices sectors, along with other speculative securities. This suggests that the engine of the most recent leg of the advance, which has got so many investors so excited, could just be a mean-reversion focused on the battered growth stocks (see the Carvana example in OTHER NEWS, above).
Interestingly, Mid Cap stocks continues to show technical outperformance relative to both Large Cap and Small Cap.
From a technical standpoint, none of this really screams lift-off.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
US stock and bond markets will be closed for Presidents’ Day on Monday. After that, investors can look forward to quite a busy slate of earnings and some fresh economic data.
Home Depot, Walmart, Alibaba, Moderna, eBay, Block, Warner Bros, Newmont, Intuit, TJX, Keurig Dr. Pepper, Booking Holdings, Autodesk, Lucid and Palo Alto Networks are set to headline earnings reports this week.
On Wednesday, the Federal Open Market Committee will release the minutes from its early February meeting which could make interesting reading after some comments by Fed insiders last week.
The second estimate of Q4 2022 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) comes out on Thursday. Forecasts are that GDP increased at an annual rate of 2.5%.
The National Association of Realtors will report existing home sales for January. Expectations are for 4.1 million homes sold.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 34% (37% the previous week)
→Neutral: 37% (38% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 29% (25% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↑Bullish by 5 (Bullish by 12 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
FEDWATCH TOOL ..
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool, calculated from Federal Funds futures prices as of market close on Friday:
How does the market view the probability that interest rates (Fed Funds rate, currently 4.625%) will be at/above or below 5% at year-end?
(one week earlier: 45% — 55%, one month earlier: 2% — 98%)
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate) on March 22nd after their next meeting?
(one week earlier: 0%, one month earlier: 19%)
(one week earlier: 91%, one month earlier: 77%)
(one week earlier: 9%, one month earlier: 4%)
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 1.6% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 6.3% for the week
The NASDAQ-100 did slightly better than the S&P 500
Foreign Developed markets surpassed US Markets and Emerging Markets
Small Caps and Mid Caps handily beat Large Cap
Value stocks just about outperformed Growth stocks
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 166 and fell by 4 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 128 and rose by 2 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 11.8% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 18.9% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
The Lowry’s Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Day Moving Average reading last week fell very slightly from 58% to 57%.This important 0-100% reading measures overall positive stock participation. Higher readings indicate increasing positive market momentum, lower readings indicate increasing downside momentum. Extreme readings below 20% and above 80% could potentially point to imminent short term trend reversals.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
What do the wealthy do with their money? Probably not what you think. Nick Maggiulli dives in.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity).
SOFT LANDING
A soft landing, in economics, is a cyclical slowdown in economic growth that avoids recession. A soft landing is the goal of a central bank when it seeks to raise interest rates just enough to stop an economy from overheating and experiencing high inflation, without causing a severe downturn. Soft landing may also refer to a gradual, relatively painless slowdown in a particular industry or economic sector.
While airline passengers can take soft landings for granted these days, the Federal Reserve's past interest-rate hiking cycles don't have the same track record of regular success.
The term "soft landing" gained currency during the tenure of former Federal Reserve chair Alan Greenspan, widely credited with engineering one in 1994-1995. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has also suggested the Fed achieved soft landings in 1965 and 1984 and was on course for another one in 2020 before the COVID-19 pandemic intervened.
In contrast, a recession followed the last five instances when inflation peaked above 5%, in 1970, 1974, 1980, 1990, and 2008. Inflation has gone above 5% in 2022, and given the definition of a recession (two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth), which occurred after Q1 and Q2 of 2022, the economy was in a recession; however, Q3 saw GDP growth.
To combat this inflation, the Fed implemented interest rate increases over the year, which resulted in a decrease in inflation combined with economic growth in Q3 2022.
The Fed's soft landings record is, at best, mixed because the central bank doesn't exercise nearly the same control over the course of the economy as a pilot has over aircraft. The Fed's main policy tools—interest rates and asset holdings—are blunt instruments not designed to solve supply chain disruptions or pandemics.
In dismissing another vehicular analogy, former Fed chair Ben Bernanke once said that "if making monetary policy is like driving a car, then the car is one that has an unreliable speedometer, a foggy windshield, and a tendency to respond unpredictably and with a delay to the accelerator or the brake." Nothing that's happened since has made the Fed's job look any easier.
Soft landing vs. a hard landing .. A country's central bank adjusts interest rates to manage the economy. If inflation is too high, a central bank will increase interest rates with the goal of slowing down spending. If the central bank raises interest rates too high or too soon, that would be a hard landing. If the central bank raises interests slowly or by a small amount, that is a soft landing. There is a fine line between the two and how the raising of interest rates will impact the economy. A central bank would not want a hard landing as it could have serious negative repercussions.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of any information provided therein.
Clients and those associated with Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
“This process is likely to take quite a bit of time, it’s not going to be smooth, it’s probably going to be bumpy”, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said on Tuesday in a speech in Washington DC, referring to getting inflation back to the Fed’s 2% target. But he could just as easily have been talking about the road to an eventual end of this bear market and a transition to a more sustainably bullish environment for stocks.
The conventional wisdom is that the current bottom recorded last October is probably “in” and, going forward, dips are going to be bought by short term investors and the larger the dip, the more aggressive the buying should be. Much as I would love for this to be the case, I do want to urge a degree of caution.
First, Powell, who has pushed back against the market narrative of peaking and then declining interest rates in 2023, has a long history of sounding one way in a speech - only to correct it at a later time. In fact, this has been a hallmark of Powell’s chairmanship. He will blow in the wind depending on the data that comes out in the coming days and weeks. Exhibit A will be the latest inflation data out this week (see THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR below).
Second, it’s not going to really matter to investors if we’ve reached peak hawkishness and peak interest rates if we’re heading for an economic hard landing (inflation conquered, but at the cost of a damaging recession), because stocks absolutely will drop from current levels in that instance.
While they might not take out that October low, we could easily be facing a 10%+ pullback on a hard landing, regardless of what the Fed does or doesn’t do. So, it’s essential that the evidence continues to point towards a soft landing, (inflation conquered, avoiding a damaging recession) so the data remains very important regardless of what Powell or his minions may say (see below).
Third, inflation absolutely must keep consistently falling from one print to the next, otherwise we risk a 1970’s style stop/start Fed rate hike campaign - and that uncertainty and apparent lack of control and competency on the part of the Fed would be the absolute worst-case scenario for both stocks and bonds.
Inflation is falling but it’s nowhere close to the Fed’s target yet. The labor market is making zero progress towards a better balance between available jobs and unemployment. For the sustainable, long-term economic growth which feeds ongoing higher stock prices, an economy must have highly visible and indisputable 1) low inflation and 2) healthy labor markets.
On that subject, Goldman Sachs last week reduced its likelihood of a recession this year from a 35% probability to 25%. That's good news for stocks.
At the same time, Fed officials swarmed across the country, busily ratcheting up the rhetoric to try to create a narrative that we are absolutely not out of the woods yet.
Federal Reserve Bank of New York president John Williams said the guidance for peak interest rates of 5.1% this year is still reasonable and that rates may need to be kept there for “a few years”.
Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller noted the central bank’s interest rate hikes are starting to “pay off” but it will take “some time” for inflation to get back to the 2% target.
Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook said the central bank is not yet done with interest rate increases but she still believes a soft economic landing is “possible”.
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis president Neel Kashkari said he anticipates that interest rates will go above 5% at some point this year and expects them to remain high for a while to cool inflation.
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta president Raphael Bostic went much further, even referring at one point to the possibility of a 6.0% terminal rate.
In what is beginning to feel like a coordinated campaign to win the hearts and minds of the investing community, similar sentiments were also expressed last week by European Central Bank (ECB) officials, as well as JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon who told Reuters that it's too early to declare victory over inflation.
This PR onslaught did seem somewhat successful in reining in some of the more wide-eyed optimism that we had seen the previous week and stocks spent most of the week stumbling along rather like a drunken sailor, continually taking one step forward and then two steps back to end up lower for the week. The exception was in the energy sector as Russia announced a cut in oil production, spiking oil prices and boosting the value of energy stocks.
With shorter-term interest rates moving higher at a faster pace than longer-term ones, the yield curve inversion between two year rates and ten year rates is at its widest level since the celebration time of Kool and the Gang in 1981. In olden timey days, an inverted yield curve and especially one inverting more and more steeply over a long period of time (we’ve been inverted since July 2022), was a nailed-on indicator of a recession right around the corner.
The inevitability of this effect is being challenged, however, as many observers are suggesting that if everybody suddenly knows about an assumed correlation, then maybe its efficacy is over and that a recession is far from unavoidable just because the yield curve inversion points that way.
We need to remain aware that, for stocks to remain buoyant in the face of still-rising rates, we need to see 1) inflation as shown by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) not to make any kind of comeback, starting this coming Tuesday, and 2) important economic readings show stability and ongoing unquestionable improvement. If we get the opposite, we may well need to prep for more painful volatility.
OTHER NEWS ..
What a difference a year makes .. This time last year, crypto exchanges and related products coughed up enormous amounts of money for plenty of high-profile Super Bowl advertising, many with celebrity endorsements. Today Fox Sports says there will be a grand total of none.
Back then, traditional financial institutions as well as highly-endorsed entertainers, influencers and sports stars were getting into crypto. Crypto evangelists puffed their chests out and bellowed that the El Salvador experiment and Russia’s subsequent invasion of Ukraine would soon help push crypto into the mainstream.
But just a few months of interest-rate hikes and risk-off sentiment in financial markets burst the bubble. The entire crypto ecosystem is now about a third of the size it was then. The complete collapse of Terra/Luna, Genesis, FTX and many others - often as a result of fraud, theft, incompetence or some combination of all three - has done untold damage to the industry’s reputation that was already fragile. Regulators can smell blood and are finally moving in.
Payward Inc.’s Kraken platform on Thursday said it had agreed to pay over $30m in fines to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over its staking practice, which essentially allows holders of some crypto coins to earn a yield from them, after regulators came down on the practice.
Regulatory sanctions on Kraken may just be the tip of the iceberg. The SEC has a problem with staking. It simply looks like exactly what it is, a financial service involving unregistered securities and you can be sure that the SEC is going to do something about that. That’s a big issue for those players still trying to make a living in the now-smaller crypto universe and always thought they could do so within the freedom of an unregulated environment. Good luck with that, bros.
Crashing shipping costs .. One of the main drivers of the recent significant drop in wholesale inflation affecting manufacturers is rapidly falling shipping costs. These costs climbed to historic highs in the second half of 2021 due to supply-chain stress and remained elevated through the first half of last year. Now it looks like they're coming back down to pre-pandemic levels.
The Freightos Baltic Index (FBX) is a widely recognized benchmark for global freight rates and has fallen 80% since its peak in late 2021. The FBX works in cooperation with the Baltic Exchange to create an aggregate of real-time market rates from global freight carriers.
Prices for FBX's top six major global shipping routes are down as much as 55% from just 90 days ago. That's important, as shipping costs are a key driver of inflation. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that when freight prices double, annual retail inflation rates increase by 0.7%. We are currently seeing the exact opposite of that.
The decline in freight prices over the past year has fueled the recent dramatic drop in prices paid by manufacturers this year. It also points to even further declines in the future that will ultimately feed through to dampening the retail measure of inflation.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Following the bursting of the internet and technology bubble, the S&P 500 reached its lowest bear market low in October 2002. However, a new bull market did not get underway in earnest until March 2003. Some are seeing parallels in the current environment.
It is quite possible that the October 2022 low in the major price indexes was indeed “the bottom,” but that is something that can only be confidently determined with more hindsight than is available today. For now, the technical evidence points to some sort of low likely having formed then and the probabilities for further near-term gains are improving.
Last week’s declines, in terms of both price and indicators, were actually quite orderly, at least so far, given the overbought conditions they came from.
The problem is that while buyers are buying in most areas of the market, they are not putting increasing amounts of money to work, as would be expected as a major new uptrend unfolds. Net up/down volume has been falling since November 2022 and this includes January 2023.
However, the downtrend line from January 2022 has now finally been broken but while the full array of positive evidence may be promising, the characteristics surrounding the formation of the potential bottom do still leave some questions. The strength of the evidence increases the probabilities that any decline will likely be contained. But there are no guarantees and monitoring the resilience or the deterioration in the indicators will be crucial.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
You might want to buckle up this week, as hugely important inflation reports and more fourth-quarter results will be coming at us all. About 60 S&P 500 companies are scheduled to report including Airbnb, Coca-Cola, Cisco, Biogen, Shopify, Kraft Heinz, Applied Materials, Hasbro, Paramount, Door Dash, Deere and Marriott International.
The key event on the calendar this week, however, will be Tuesday's Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for January. The consensus expectation is that the CPI increased by 0.5% in the month and 6.2% year over year. The Core CPI, which excludes food and energy components, is seen rising 0.3% month-to-month and 5.4% from a year ago.
We will also see Retail Sales (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) for January on Wednesday and the latest Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation felt by manufacturers on Thursday.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
This indicator now shows a bullish majority for the first time since March 2022 and is now at its most bullish since September 2021.
↑Bullish: 37% (30% the previous week)
→Neutral: 38% (35% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 25% (35% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↑Bullish by 12 (Bearish by 5 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
FEDWATCH TOOL ..
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool, calculated from Federal Funds futures prices:
What are the latest market expectations for what the Fed will announce re: interest rate changes (Fed Funds rate) on March 22nd after their next meeting?
0% probability of no change (one week earlier: 3%, one month earlier: 16%)
91% probability of a 0.25% increase (one week earlier: 97%, one month earlier: 65%)
9% probability of a 0.50% increase (one week earlier: 0%, one month earlier: 19%)
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 5.1% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Communications Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - down 5.6% for the week
The NASDAQ-100 fell by more than the S&P 500
US Markets fell by less than both Emerging Markets and Foreign Developed
Small Caps were the week’s biggest losers with Large Cap losing the least
Growth stocks performed a little worse than Value stocks
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 170 and fell by 20 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 126 and rose by 15 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 11.6% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 19.3% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
The Lowry’s Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Day Moving Average reading last week fell from 78% to 58%.This important 0-100% reading measures overall positive stock participation. Higher readings indicate increasing positive market momentum, lower readings indicate increasing downside momentum. Extreme readings below 20% and above 80% could potentially point to imminent short term trend reversals.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
What is the most damaging financial trait you can have as an investor?
Morgan Housel tells us.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
RETAIL SALES
The term "retail sales" refers to an economic metric that tracks consumer demand for finished goods. This figure is a very important data set as it is a key monthly market-moving event. Retail sales are reported each month by the U.S. Census Bureau and indicate the direction of the economy. It acts as a key economic barometer and whether inflationary pressures exist. Retail sales are measured by durable and non-durable goods purchased over a defined period of time. Sales for the report are derived from 13 types of retailers from food service to retail stores.
Retail sales are a good indicator of the pulse of the economy and its projected path toward expansion or contraction. Retail sales figures are reported by all food service and retail stores and compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau. The measurement is typically based on data sampling and is used to model the patterns for the entire country.
As a leading macroeconomic indicator, healthy retail sales figures typically elicit positive movements in equity markets. Higher sales are good news for shareholders of retail companies because it means higher earnings. Bondholders, on the other hand, are quite ambivalent towards this metric. A booming economy is good for all, but lower retail sales figures and a contracting economy would translate to a decrease in inflation. This may cause investors to gravitate toward bonds, eventually leading to higher bond prices.
Retail sales capture in-store sales, as well as catalog and other out-of-store sales of both durable (last for more than three years) and non-durable goods (those with a three-year or shorter life span). These are broken down into a number of different categories including (but not limited to):
Clothing & clothing accessories stores
Pharmacies & drug stores
Food & beverage stores
Electronics and appliance stores
Furniture stores
Gasoline stations
New car dealers
As a broad economic indicator, the retail sales report is one of the timeliest reports because it provides data that is only a few weeks old. Individual retail companies often provide their own sales figures at the same time every month, and their stocks can experience volatility as investors process the data.
Major changes in price can affect retail sales figures. These fluctuations in prices are seen primarily in two retail sales categories: food retailers and gas stations. Large increases in food and energy prices can cause sales figures to drop in both categories, thus affecting the sales of a particular month.
An accurate measure of retail sales is incredibly vital for gauging the economic health of the U.S. This is due to the fact that consumer spending, or Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE), accounts for two-thirds of gross domestic product (GDP). Retail sales are reported in the U.S. on a monthly basis.
The data for the report is collected by the U.S. Census Bureau in its Monthly Retail Trade Survey. The report, which is released in the middle of every month, shows the total number of sales in the measured time period, usually the prior month, and the percentage change from the last report. The report also includes the year-over-year change in sales to account for the seasonality of consumer-based retail.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of any information provided therein.
Clients and those associated with Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC, see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK) surprised absolutely no-one by raising interest rates on Wednesday by a quarter of a percent to a target range of 4.50% to 4.75%.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell dropped a few hawkish soundbites at his post-announcement press conference, all designed to be played out of context on CNBC, saying that monetary policy “does not yet look sufficiently restrictive” and that“ongoing increases in the target range will be appropriate”.
But he also said, “We can now say, I think for the first time, that the disinflationary process has started” . The overall picture he was desperately trying to paint was that of a Fed that's not done yet, but may possibly be acknowledging that we are at the beginning of the end of the tightening cycle.
Financial markets reacted by effectively calling the Fed’s bluff, viewing Powell’s performance as rather wishy-washy, where he seemed keen not to rule anything out and appeared to be almost defensively over-explaining his position as well as telling us what he thinks that things will look like in December while at the same time claiming to have no idea what things will look like in March.
The market, which is convinced that we are much closer to the end of the rate-hiking era than the Fed wants to let on and that interest rate cuts lie in our not-too-distant future, scoffed at the Chairman.
We believe you now even less than we did before, the market said and is starting to act like an emboldened rebellious teenager, no longer listening to what its parents are saying and going off to do its own thing, which in this case was to buy the crap out of everything - especially tech and communication services stocks, which soared in the Wednesday afternoon session.
It was a similar story overseas. The European Central Bank (ECB) lifted its key rate by half a percentage point to 2.5%, in line with expectations. It said that it plans to raise rates by the same amount in March but thereafter committed only to “evaluate the subsequent path of its monetary policy” - a big walk-back on it’s previously combative stance. The Bank of England also raised interest rates by half a percent, to 4.0%, but indicated that it will slow the pace of hikes to a quarter of a percent or maybe even pause at its next meeting in March.
The benchmark two-year Treasury interest rates fell hard, as did the futures market expectation of where rates will be at the end of the year, becoming even further disconnected from the much higher level that the Fed insists they will be at. The US Dollar responded by extending its recent decline, generally viewed as good thing for US businesses.
Part of the reason the stock market gets so excited about the fact we may be entering the zone of an end to rate hikes is that history tells us that this period has typically rewarded patient investors in the past. Returns for the S&P 500 Index in the year following the end of rate-hike cycles since 1980 have averaged 16% and if you zoom out to the two years following an end to the cycle, that return jumps to nearly 36%.
The problem is that there is another scenario for investors where the market’s current assumption that the era of rates hike is essentially done turns out to be incorrect as inflation rears its ugly head again in the not-too-distant future causing the Fed to have to revisit its role as party pooper by going back to raising interest rates again, financially assaulting those investors sucked in by the current euphoria with a destructive stock market decline that will inevitably follow that decision.
The day after the Fed announcement was marked by a big triple earnings miss; Apple, Amazon and Alphabet/Google all disappointed in their Q4 2022 reports and forward guidance. All three of these stocks, however, ended the week higher than where they were at the beginning.
While the Fed shenanigans were doubtless the biggest event of the week, the Jobs Report on Friday was definitely the most stunning.
Consensus expectations going in were for a 190k increase in jobs in January and for the unemployment rate to tick up to 3.6%. The number came in more than double that with an extraordinary 517k new jobs created and an unemployment rate that actually fell to 3.4%, the lowest since Neil Diamond first sung about a sweet girl named Caroline in 1969.
The final numbers are in for calendar year 2022 and the US economy added an astounding 4.5 million jobs in twelve months. Recession? Er, I don’t think so.
There were few signs of expanding wage inflation in the most recent report, however, which is the part that the Fed focuses most closely on. Average hourly earnings crept only slightly higher and, importantly, no more than expected.
Nonetheless, investors were shaken by the headline numbers of the report, having been expecting further signs of a slowing economy and instead seeing broad growth, particularly across leisure and hospitality, health care and professional services. Market interest rates exploded back upwards after the release of the data on the idea that maybe the Fed won’t be done raising rates quite as quickly as everybody was thinking just 24 hours earlier and stocks sank in response.
It was not enough, however to ruin what was still a winning five days for stock markets, with the S&P 500 up a little under 2% for the week and the NASDAQ-100 up over 3%.
OTHER NEWS ..
The biggest story of 2023? .. Less than two weeks ago, Gautam Adani was the fourth-richest person in the world. With a personal fortune estimated at $120 billion, the self-made Indian industrialist was wealthier than Gates or Buffet.
Then Hindenburg Research, an activist investigative financial reporting organization which shorts the stock of corporations that it then goes on to expose as corrupt, fraudulent or misleading investors, accused Adani and his companies of widespread fraud and “brazen stock manipulation” that it alleged has taken place over decades.
In a highly detailed report, Hindenburg pitched no less than 88 questions to Adani that cast severe doubts on his conglomerate’s financial health. Those ranged from requests for details on the group’s offshore entities to why it has “such a convoluted, interlinked corporate structure” leadingto the astonishing claim that he had pulled off “the largest con in corporate history” . That’s a very high bar indeed (yes, I did recently finish watching the excellent Bernie Madoff docudrama on Netflix).
In a matter of days since the report was released, the value of Adani’s firms has fallen by a head-spinning $110 billion and his own personal wealth has been halved so that he is now down to his last $61 billion as investors flee in droves.
And we may only be witnessing the opening act of what could turn into a financial earthquake. Already burned by the fallout in the story’s first few days is the brother of the disgraced ex-UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who has been forced to resign as head of an implicated investment company as a direct result of the report’s findings. Stand by, this story could get very, very big and sting a lot more people and organizations before it’s done.
Why didn’t they just put Bruce Willis on it? .. A ridiculous spat over a Chinese balloon that US authorities admitted posed zero risk of physical harm and carried no intelligence-gathering capability that was lingering over The Middle of Nowhere, USA resulted in the mind-boggling decision to postpone US Secretary State Anthony Blinken’s important and already long overdue visit to China and caused an inevitable but completely unnecessary escalation of tension between the countries when the thing was eventually shot down.
It’s just the latest example of pointless, petty political b**t getting in the way of something as important as the national and global interest of helping to optimize the trading relationship between the world’s two largest economies.
Investors are still very cautious .. Nearly one-third of respondents to an Investopedia investor survey expect the S&P 500 to fall at least 5% over the next six months, while only 16% expect it to trade at least 5% higher, and 11% expect it to be flat.
The lack of conviction that the stock market will trend higher is also reflected in what investors said that they are doing with their money. Only one in five respondents said they are (wisely IMO) investing more in the stock market than a year ago, while over 30% are (foolishly IMO) investing less because they think stocks have further to fall. 47% of respondents said they are “playing it safe” by raising cash and buying cash equivalents, like CDs. Only 11% said they were taking more risk with their investments than they were a year ago.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
Technical analysis can provide a framework that allows investors to follow what is happening, not to anticipate it. Confirmation signals are always required to avoid the whipsaw effect of a high number of false dawns. This inevitably means that a market bottom is viewed as a process, not an event and that the absolute bottom of the market (or absolute top in different circumstances) can never be precisely identified in real time, only after it has actually occurred.
The fact is that we do not yet have enough confirmation signals to confidently call an end to the bear market and it still nags that there has been a lack of evidence of complete capitulation followed by the sustained indiscriminate buying that usually accompanies these turnarounds.
Despite these nuanced imperfections in the traditional bear-to-bull market narrative, "golden crosses" are forming in some of the major indexes. This is when a stock or index's 50-day moving average crosses above the 200-day moving average and heads higher. These are considered to show a technically positive outlook for stock prices contained in that index.
The primary issue we now face is the market’s overbought condition, which must be watched carefully. This can work itself out in one of two ways. Overbought conditions at the genuine birth of a sustainable bull market are positive, carrying only temporarily negative conditions, before providing a springboard for a further resurgence. However, if this is not the start to a new bull market and more like a head-fake à la the multiple times it happened in 2022, several indicators are right now up against the exact levels from which they invariably sharply reversed on previous occasions.
How this resolves itself in the short term is going to be very important in assessing the viability of this rally.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Q4 2022 earnings season continues next week, with about 90 of the S&P 500 companies scheduled to report. The scorecard so far: earnings are down about 3% from the same period a year ago.
Disney, Philip Morris, CVS, BP, Uber, PayPal, Hilton, Honda, Take Two Interactive, Chipotle, Expedia, DuPont, Royal Caribbean, Simon Property Group and AbbVie will be among the highlights.
It will be a relatively quiet week on the economic-data calendar after last week’s avalanche, with really just the University of Michigan's February Consumer Sentiment Index of interest. That's forecast to come in roughly unchanged from January's figure, which showed widespread pessimism among consumers.
On Tuesday, economists, Federal Reserve watchers and nerds like me will be tuning into a speech from Fed Chairman Jerome Powell at the Economic Club of Washington DC to see if we can pick up any meaningful nuggets.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 30% (28% the previous week)
→Neutral: 35% (35% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 35% (37% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 5 (Bearish by 9 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communications Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 5.2% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 5.7% for the week
The NASDAQ-100 rose substantially more than the S&P 500
US Markets again soundly beat both Emerging Markets and Foreign Developed
Small Caps were the week’s winners ahead of Mid, with Large Cap bringing up the rear
Growth stocks performed a little better than Value stocks
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 190 and rose by 7 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 111 and fell by 2 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains well above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 10.7% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains well above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 17.6% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
The Lowry’s Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Day Moving Average reading rose from 54% to 78%.This important 0-100% reading measures overall positive stock participation. Higher readings indicate increasing positive market momentum, lower readings indicate increasing downside momentum. Extreme readings below 20% and above 80% could potentially point to imminent short term trend reversals.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
I miss Sam Bankman Fried. He’s been out of the news for a few days now, apart from a report that he has apparently told friends that he is expecting prison to be just like it appears in “The Shawshank Redemption” (btw, I hold the apparently sacrilegious view that this is just about the most over-rated movie ever - I really fail to see what all the fuss is about, it’s just kind of ok). So, to hold us all over till the next shoe drops in this wild FTX story, here are 13 lessons to learn from the SBF and FTX debacle.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE
The term Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) refers to the branch of the Federal Reserve System (FRS) that determines the direction of monetary policy in the United States by directing open market operations (OMOs). The committee is made up of 12 members, including seven members of the Board of Governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and four of the remaining 11 Reserve Bank presidents, who serve on a rotating basis.
The 12 members of the FOMC meet eight times a year to discuss whether there should be any changes to near-term monetary policy. A vote to change policy would result in either buying or selling U.S. government securities on the open market to promote the growth of the national economy. Committee members are typically categorized as hawks favoring tighter monetary policies, doves who favor stimulus, or centrists/moderates who are somewhere in between.
The FOMC chair is also the chair of the Board of Governors. The current makeup of the board is as follows:
The chair is Jerome Powell, who was sworn in for a second four-year term on May 23, 2022. He began his first term in this role in February 2018. Powell is considered a moderate.
The vice-chair of the FOMC is Lael Brainard. She was also sworn into the position on May 23, 2022, for a full four-year term. She joined the board in June 2014.
Other Federal Reserve Board members include Michelle Bowman, Michael Barr, Lisa Cook, Philip Jefferson, and Christopher Waller.
There are 12 Federal Reserve districts, each with its own Federal Reserve Bank. These regional banks operate as extensions of the central bank. The president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York serves continuously while the presidents of the others serve one-year terms on a three-year rotating schedule (except for Cleveland and Chicago, which rotate on a two-year basis).
The one-year rotating seats of the FOMC are always comprised of one Reserve Bank president from each of the following groups:
Boston, Philadelphia, and Richmond
Cleveland and Chicago
St. Louis, Dallas, and Atlanta
Kansas City, Minneapolis, and San Francisco
The geographic-group system helps ensure that all regions of the United States receive fair representation.
The FOMC has eight regularly scheduled meetings each year, but they can meet more often if the need should arise. The meetings are not held in public and are therefore the subject of much speculation on Wall Street, as analysts attempt to predict whether the Fed will tighten or loosen the money supply with a resulting increase or decrease in interest rates.
In recent years, FOMC meeting minutes have been made public following the meetings. When it is reported in the news that the Fed changed interest rates, it is the result of the FOMC's regular meetings.
During the meeting, members discuss developments in the local and global financial markets, as well as economic and financial forecasts. All participants—the Board of Governors and all 12 Reserve Bank presidents—share their views on the country’s economic stance and converse on the monetary policy that would be most beneficial for the country. After much deliberation by all participants, only designated FOMC members get to vote on a policy that they consider appropriate for the period.
The Federal Reserve possesses the tools necessary to increase or decrease the money supply. This is done through OMOs, adjusting the discount rate, and setting bank reserve requirements. The Fed's Board of Governors is in charge of setting the discount rate and reserve requirements, while the FOMC is specifically in charge of OMOs, which entails buying and selling government securities. For example, to tighten the money supply and decrease the amount of money available in the banking system, the Fed would offer government securities for sale.1
Securities bought by the FOMC are deposited in the Fed's System Open Market Account (SOMA), which consists of a domestic and a foreign portfolio. The domestic portfolio holds U.S. Treasuries and federal agency securities, while the foreign portfolio holds investments denominated in euros and Japanese yen.
The FOMC can hold these securities until maturity or sell them when they see fit, as granted by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and Monetary Control Act of 1980. A percentage of the Fed's SOMA holdings are held in each of the 12 regional Reserve Banks; however, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York executes all of the Fed's open market transactions.
The process begins with the results of the meeting being communicated to the SOMA manager, who relays them to the trading desk at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which then conducts transactions of government securities on the open market until the FOMC mandate is met.
The interaction of all of the Fed's policy tools determines the federal funds rate or the rate at which depository institutions lend their balances at the Federal Reserve to each other on an overnight basis. The federal funds rate, in turn, directly influences other short-term rates and indirectly influences long-term interest rates; foreign exchange rates, and the supply of credit and demand for investment, employment, and economic output.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of any information provided therein.
Clients and those associated with Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The already-wide gap between what the Fed says will happen and what the market thinks will happen just keeps on getting wider. Fed presidents are out there barking at us at every opportunity that the Fed Funds rate that it controls will be around 5.1% by year-end, or a full percentage point higher than where we are now. The stock market, by means of the Fed Funds futures prices set by large institutional traders, have this rate priced at south of 4.4%.
Such a divergence is extremely unusual and one of them will probably end up being right. If it’s the market (and historically speaking, it usually is), then the Fed will pivot to an end to the policy of raising rates (Q1?) and consider lowering them sooner rather than later (Q2? Q3?). If it’s the Fed, then such a pivot won’t come until much later in the year (Q4, if at all?) and stocks will have at least the next three quarters to potentially move steadily but solidly lower from here while we wait.
This will impact the “soft vs. hard landing” debate, in other words; will inflation be beaten by the interest rate hikes without a major, damaging recession (soft) or will the policy push the economy into a nasty recession that badly harms company earnings (hard).
This issue won’t be settled for weeks or months and until it is, the pendulum will probably continue to swing back and forth between hope and fear. But barring a major macroeconomic surprise or an utterly disastrous turn of events in the earnings arena, the S&P 500 is likely going to remain quite range-bound, although within rather elastic guard-rails. The fact is that, as things stand, we do not know whether this bear market is about to come to an end or is setting itself up to take another nasty leg lower. Neither case can be ruled out and near-term volatility will be the most plausible result.
At this point, it feels as though the market is beginning to think that Wednesdays’ expected 0.25% rate hike (see THE WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR, below) could be the last in the cycle and the long-awaited pause will come at the next meeting in March. Some of the more wide-eyed optimists even believe that we may get a hint to this effect from Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s press conference on Wednesday afternoon. Personally, I think this is a bit fanciful - but we’ll see.
Last week, the market did not, as was the case for much of last year, interpret strong economic data as being bad news because it might mean that the Fed won’t pause.
It was announced that Q4 2022 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rose at an annual rate of 2.9%, a little higher than expected, following a 3.2% increase for the third quarter. As always on Wall Street, there were two ways of looking at the numbers.
The “glass is half-empty” case is there was good growth but for the wrong reasons as imports fell and inventory numbers were building at a time when supply chain issues were getting resolved, implying an increasingly more depressed and lower-spending American consumer.
Investors chose, however, to go down the “glass is half-full” route that what the GDP numbers actually showed was the US economy’s fierce resilience in the face of the long campaign of aggressive Fed rate hikes, which ultimately bolsters the soft landing case.
We also got the Fed’s absolute fave data point and its chosen proxy for inflation, Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE), which rose 0.1% in December and was up just 5.0% from a year ago, down half a percentage point from the year-on-year rate of the month before. This was all roughly in line with economist estimates and considered a definite positive in the battle against inflation in the eyes of the Fed. At the same time, we also learned that the University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index is on the rise, boosting optimism about the economy.
Packaging all this data together, stocks had a generally strong week with just a few pockets of weakness (notably the Healthcare sector). Investors seemed very inclined last week to give most stocks the benefit of the doubt and see buying opportunities almost everywhere going into this week’s critical Fed meeting and interest rate announcement. But investors and their stocks can often be fickle friends, let’s see how things shake out on Wednesday.
OTHER NEWS ..
NYSE tech trouble .. The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) suffered a severe technical glitch at the opening bell last Tuesday morning that caused wild unjustified price swings in the shares of more than 250 companies, leading to trading halts. The exchange added that some trades will be declared "null and void" as a result because they were erroneous under its rules. The NYSE said operations were said to be back to normal after about half an hour.
My broad advice to clients has always been to place trades only between 10:30am and 3pm ET and only on days when the S&P 500 is up or down by less than 2% on the day at that point. Not that this will always save you from technology glitches, but outside of these hours there’s always a greater potential for factors that are idiosyncratic to stock exchange participants on that day to be the principal determinant of prices rather than just market forces.
U-Turn Larry .. Former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, traditionally a big fan of aggressive interest rate hikes, joined Team Pivot last week when he surprised many by warning the Fed against signaling any more rate hikes after this week's monetary policy announcement, which, he said, could hurt already fragile economic growth.
Early skirmishes .. On Thursday, we saw the first sign of financial market skittishness re: the likely upcoming debt ceiling st-show that I talked about in my report last week. Stocks dived briefly on news that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer was discussing having to “protect the full faith and credit of the United States” in the face of rumblings from extremist senators that seem “disturbingly at ease with taking our economy hostage in exchange for gutting vital programs” like Social Security and Medicare.
Watch this space but, as I said last week, try your very best to ignore all this hysterical hot air when it comes to making changes to your portfolio.
UNDER THE HOOD ..
The S&P 500 and NASDAQ-100 are now both comfortably above their respective 200-day moving averages. That's a key level for market technicians that can now act as support for when things get softer in the future instead of a technical ceiling that the market kept hitting and backing away from, which is what it was before.
Markets deal in probabilities, not certainties and the technical probabilities favoring clearer skies ahead are no doubt increasing. For instance, the spread between Lowry’s Buying Power and Selling Pressure is at its most positive level in favor of the buyers in nearly two years. This tells us that the net effect on price of buyers is greater than the net effect from sellers.
However, one sign that is missing is a surge in volume as the rally begins. Pent up Demand should be wildly unleashed, yet net upside-volume has actually been falling since November. While volume around the holidays is always structurally lower, the trend has remained in place into January. This lack of power behind the gains could be indicative of just investor bottom-fishing rather than the rampant un-caging of the bulls.
Further evidence that bottom-fishing is what is going on rather than a full-on demand surge is the relative outperformance of the market’s most beaten down areas (stocks more than 30% below their one year highs). Real rallies are built on a base of the indiscriminate buying of anything that moves, not just the bargain basement stuff.
So the jury is still out and until that changes, we remain in a downward-trending environment from a technical perspective.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Huge. It’s the only word that can accurately describe this week’s upcoming financial calendar.
About 20% of S&P 500companies are scheduled to report in the next five days, including such monsters as Apple, Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook, Amazon, Exxon-Mobil, Pfizer, McDonalds, UPS, General Motors, Eli Lilly, T-Mobile US, Ford, Starbucks, Merck, Qualcomm, Caterpillar and Advanced Micro Devices.
However, even this illustrious list of earnings reports is overshadowed by the week’s main event; the conclusion of the two-day meeting of the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee on Wednesday. The overwhelming expectation is that the Federal Funds rate will be further raised by a quarter of a percentage point but, as always, the post-meeting press conference from Fed Chair Jerome Powell at around 2:30pm ET will be closely watched for hints about the Fed's next moves.
And, as if all that excitement wasn’t enough, Friday brings us the latest Jobs Report. Consensus calls for the creation of another 190k jobs in the US economy between December 2022 and January 2023, following a gain of 223k the previous month. The unemployment rate is expected to tick back up by a tenth of a point, to 3.6%.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months) ..
↑Bullish: 28% (31% the previous week)
→Neutral: 35% (36% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 37% (33% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 9 (Bearish by 2 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS ..
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 6.4% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: UnitedHealth Group, Johnson & Johnson) - down 0.8% for the week
The NASDAQ-100 strongly outperformed the S&P 500
US Markets soundly beat both Emerging Markets and Foreign Developed
Large Cap did a little better than Mid and Small Cap
Growth stocks performed a little better than Value stocks
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 183 and rose by 6 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 113 and fell by 11 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and above its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 12.1% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and has now moved above its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 20.2% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
The Lowry’s Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Day Moving Average reading rose slightly from 51% to 54%.This important 0-100% reading measures overall positive stock participation. Higher readings indicate increasing positive market momentum, lower readings indicate increasing downside momentum. Extreme readings below 20% and above 80% could potentially point to imminent short term trend reversals.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
Josh Brown’s insight into how, after just three months, ChatGPT (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK, below) is in many ways already everything that Bitcoin promised to be and has simply not delivered on for well over a decade now.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK ..A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
ChatGPT
ChatGPT, the free chatbot released in late 2022 by artificial intelligence (AI) research company OpenAI, has taken the internet by storm. In its first months of existence, ChatGPT inspired users to imagine a host of use cases for the model, including using ChatGPT to negotiate parking tickets, make workout plans, and even create bedtime stories for children. Some artificial intelligence experts believe that ChatGPT could revolutionize both the way that humans interact with chatbots and AI more broadly.
What is Chat GPT? .. Put simply, ChatGPT is an AI model that engages in conversational dialogue. It is an example of a chatbot, akin to the automated chat services found on some companies’ customer service websites.3 It was developed by OpenAI, a tech research company dedicated to ensuring that artificial intelligence benefits all of humanity. The “GPT” in ChatGPT refers to “Generative Pre-training Transformer,” referring to the way that ChatGPT processes language.
What sets ChatGPT apart from chatbots over the last several decades, however, is that ChatGPT was trained using reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). RLHF involves the use of human AI trainers and reward models to develop ChatGPT into a bot capable of challenging incorrect assumptions, answering follow-up questions, and admitting mistakes.
To put ChatGPT to the test, Investopedia asked it to “write a journalistic-style article explaining what ChatGPT is.” The bot responded that it was “designed to generate human-like text based on a given prompt or conversation.” It added that, because it is trained on a data set of human conversations, it can understand context and intent and is able to have more natural, intuitive conversations.
In its response to our prompt, ChatGPT said that its applications could include customer service bots, creation of content for social media or blogs, and translation of text from one language to another.
Benefits of ChatGPT .. As mentioned, there are numerous potential uses for ChatGPT. They range from more direct, chatbot-type functions to much more obscure applications, and it is likely that users will explore a host of other possible ways to utilize this technology in the future, including in search engines.
While chatbots have existed for many years, ChatGPT is viewed as a significant improvement on the intelligibility, fluidity, and thoroughness of prior models. One demonstration of the sophistication of ChatGPT provided by OpenAI includes a prompt that was designed to trick the bot: asking about when Christopher Columbus (supposedly) came to the United States in 2015. ChatGPT’s response easily avoided the trap, clarifying that while Columbus did not come to the U.S. in 2015, it can posit some of the ways he may have reacted to his visit if he had.
Limitations/Drawbacks .. OpenAI lists some of the limitations of ChatGPT as it currently exists in its presentation of the model. These include that ChatGPT sometimes writes coherent but incorrect statements, that it makes assumptions about ambiguous queries, and that the model tends to be excessively verbose, among similar concerns.
In the first weeks of its public release, ChatGPT made headlines for its alleged use among students in creating AI-written papers and assignments. Concerns about the misuse of ChatGPT for academic cheating grew large enough that a computer science student at Princeton University created an app designed to identify and expose writing created by the bot.
For some, ChatGPT poses additional and more serious risks. For instance, some analysts have predicted that the bot could be used to make malware and phishing attacks more sophisticated, or that hackers may utilize the technology to develop their own AI models that may be less well-controlled. As concerns about misinformation have proliferated, some are especially sensitive to the possibility that ChatGPT could be used to create and share convincing but misleading material of a political nature.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of any information provided therein.
Clients and those associated with Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Financial markets and the Fed are playing a game of chicken. The Fed continues to wheel out its own people to double-down on their position that interest rates will be shortly be raised to above 5% and will stay there for ages until inflation is unquestionably showing signs of being 2% again, like it was in the good old days.
Financial markets, as shown by fed funds futures rates and trader sentiment, are calling BS on this. They insist that upcoming data will sway the Fed to stop raising interest rates soon and possibly even force them into a pivot back to lowering them before year-end due to having overshot with the hikes.
Until we learn for sure who the chicken is, market sentiment will continue to sit somewhere between hope and fear and last week was a classic example of this.
Stock indexes had broadly rallied to start 2023 and the biggest reason was that investors are interpreting further declines in inflation and slowing economic growth as increasing the chances for an economic “soft landing” . Nevertheless, for the second week running, the indexes were forced to stage a late-week rally, mostly led by beaten-down tech, to provide some window dressing for what was, on the face of it, a rather unimpressive weekly performance.
However, when you look more closely, it’s interesting to note that investors don’t appear to be fleeing stocks because they're were worried about a recession. If that were the case there’d be noticeable outperformance on the part of the more defensive stocks of companies that sell electricity, toilet paper or toothpaste over those of the more risky firms in tech and more discretionary areas. The opposite happened last week. That suggests that the market is just confused and churning without a real plan as to what it thinks or wants to do.
One obvious place it can look to for more directional clarity is earnings and Q4 2022 earnings season has started ramping up. There has been quite a lot of yucky news coming out of corporate America.
Just last week alone:
Goldman Sachs (GS) reported a major earnings miss as a barren investment banking /mergers and acquisitions landscape and the apparent failure of its consumer banking venture damaged earnings and the tone of the forward guidance.
Microsoft (MSFT) shares fell hard after the software giant announced it was cutting 10k jobs
Alphabet/Google (GOOGL) announced will cut 12k jobs or about 6% of its workforce in the largest round of layoffs in the company’s history, although the stock actually rebounded on this news
Bank of America (BAC) shares slid on a report it has frozen most hiring to save money
While Morgan Stanley (MS)'s stock initially shot higher on its cheery asset management earnings, CIO Mike Wilson reaffirmed his pessimistic outlook for the US stock market, saying margins and earnings are likely going to disappoint and reset guidance lower
Charles Schwab (SCHW) was massively downgraded by analysts with expectations of yield-seeking customers moving large amounts of cash out of Schwab’s highly profitable (to Schwab, that is, not to their account holders) Cash Sweep Account into money market, treasury bills and high yield savings accounts that these days finally pay close to 4% interest or sometimes even more
Insurance company Travelers (TRV) said catastrophe losses from the big winter storm at the end of 2022 negatively impacted its bottom line and its share price promptly dived 5%
Home Depot (HD) shares swiftly sank 4% after the Commerce Department reported housing starts and building permits fell more than anticipated last month (see OTHER NEWS, below)
Despite the fact that we did see pockets of good earnings news and guidance, Netflix (NFLX) for instance, we do seem to be experiencing an overall pattern of 2023 earnings estimates moving lower. But they are not yet collapsing and that alone could eventually end up being a positive for stocks.
The Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation felt by manufacturers fell 0.5% in December, compared to expectations of a 0.1% decline after November's 0.2% gain. The index was up 6.2% year-over-year, down from 7.3% in November. More evidence that overall inflation may be falling nicely.
Americans cut back on spending at the height of the holiday season, particularly on vehicles and furniture and in popular gift categories. Retail Sales, the measure of purchases at stores, restaurants and online, declined 1.1% in December from the prior month. That was the biggest monthly decline of 2022 and marked the second consecutive monthly drop. In aggregate, however, 2022 saw the highest adjusted level of retail sales since 2004.
The beauty in this retail sales number was in the eye of the beholder and in this case the beholder was the stock market. The good news camp say it was further evidence of a slowing economy with lower consumer spending and therefore less pressure on the Fed to keep raising rates. So, thumbs up. But if it is interpreted as further evidence of a slowing economy with lower consumer spending and therefore lower sales and lower earnings for US companies, then that could be Bad News Bears for stocks.
Before heading off to frolic at the out-of-touch orgy of icky self-aggrandizement that is the World Economic Forum in Davos where billionaires tell multi-millionaires what they think would be best for the rest of us, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen informed us that the deadline for the US hitting its debt ceiling (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) passed last week.
In the short term, this just means that some reshuffling of government assets will take place but that Band-Aid can only realistically be expected to last until late spring/early summer, when a nasty and maybe protracted political fight is likely to break out about extending the limit.
Stand by for a lot of tiresome, grandstanding Congressional theater later this year, particularly from that subset of rabid ultras in the House and Senate who thrive on simply creating political chaos and division for the sake of it and you will hear some very apocalyptic sound bites from all sides. This toxic environment is going to be frenziedly amplified by America’s grotesquely-polarized media that prioritizes online clicks and scoring cheap political points over anything approaching intellectual rigor.
We went through all this crap in 2011 and the final outcome was that the financial markets’ fear of the apocalypse ended up creating a sensational buying opportunity for both stock and bond investors.
I know it’s early but I’m going to put this out there right now .. do not be afraid to ignore and completely tune out the deafening noise when it breaks and do not allow it to shake you out of your portfolio while this scary soundtrack blares in the background. Stay strong, this nonsense will eventually pass and you will be glad you disregarded it.
OTHER NEWS
From bad to worse to even worse .. As if FTX’s millions of customers had not had enough punches in the stomach lately, the bankrupt company finally came out and admitted last week that $415 million was stolen when it was hacked back in November, just two days after its bankruptcy filing. The hacker stole about $90 million from the US exchange (that was about half of all client assets stored there), around $323 million from FTX’s international platform and $2 million from Alameda Research, its affiliated hedge fund.
Also, in a candidate for the award for 2023’s most unsurprising piece of news so far, FTX at long last also admitted that a probe of its balance sheet showed the holdings of customer funds were lower than had been shown in the exchange’s internal accounts (shocker!), acknowledging for the first time that it knew that there was a shortfall of missing money at the crypto exchange, contrary to previous self-serving statements by the disgraced former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, who is awaiting trial on massive fraud, corruption and theft charges.
Oh and by the way, as predicted by many, mammoth crypto lender Genesis has finally been brought down, filing for bankruptcy last week and blaming FTX with its dying breath. As we begin to get a peek behind the curtain of how Genesis operated and what happened to its customers’ money, it’s probably going to be disheartening news for the millions of people who believe there’s billions of their dollars still trapped there and likely yet another example of the fraud, delusion and sheer incompetence that continues to plague the entire crypto ecosystem as a direct result of the lack of regulation and oversight in the space.
Housing still in the dumps .. Homebuilders started new homes last month at a 1.38 million annual rate, down 1.4% from November and 22% below December 2021 levels. The number of permits issued — a clue as to where home construction is heading in the months ahead — fell 1.6% in a month and is now down 30% from a year ago. Builders are reacting to higher mortgage rates and stretched homebuyers by retrenching in their building plans.
Existing home sales, which make up the vast majority of the housing market, fell by 18% year-on-year to their lowest level since 2014. On a monthly basis they fell 1.5% in December, the 11th straight month of decline which is the longest such streak since the data began being collected in 1999.
The housing market has seized up as everyone involved is playing defense. Builders aren’t building. Buyers face extortionate prices and higher mortgage rates. Sellers aren’t active either because so many are still anchored to unrealistic 2021 prices and won’t budge or they don’t want to trade in their 2021-refinanced 2.75% mortgage for a brand new new 6.50% one.
Not so juicy .. The Wall Street Journal reported that Florida orange growers are harvesting their smallest crop in nearly 90 years, the result of an ill-timed freeze, two hurricanes and a citrus disease that is obliterating its groves. The state is expected to produce just 18 million 90-pound boxes of oranges, which would be less than half the size of last year’s poor crop and a 93% decline from Florida’s peak output in 1998.
To make matters worse, the Agriculture Department said the fruit this year is much smaller than usual, which means that more oranges are needed to fill each box and to squeeze for the same amount of juice. The measly crop is a blow to an industry that has become synonymous with Florida, which will now produce fewer oranges than California for the first time since World War II.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Missing from the October 2022 low that we are still bouncing from was the major spike in volume associated with investor capitulation in almost every true market bottom in recent decades. This continues to worry the technical guys when it comes to assessing the viability of the current rebound from those levels.
The S&P 500 is currently right at its very important 200-day moving average. This has been kryptonite for the index over the last 12 months as each time they test the level of this technical indicator, stocks have rolled over within a few days and begun a new downtrend, often heading back to lower lows.
Having said that, a close for the S&P 500 above the Q3 2022 highs of just above 4300 (we are at 3973 as of Friday’s close) could be a technically meaningful bullish development, shifting a lot of technical and trend-following models from bearish/neutral to neutral/bullish on a medium time frame.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Big week ahead for Q4 2022 earnings, with about 90 of the S&P 500 companies scheduled to report in the next five days. Highlights will include results from Microsoft, Tesla, IBM, Intel, Visa, Johnson & Johnson, General Electric, Verizon, Lockheed Martin, AT&T, Boeing, American Express, Comcast, Chevron, Mastercard, Visa, American Airlines and Southwest Airlines.
The Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge is part of the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report out this week. Personal earnings are expected to show a 0.2% month-over-month rise, while spending is seen falling by 0.1%.
The first estimate of Q4 2022 US Gross Domestic Product (GDP) comes out this week and is expected to show a 2.5% annual rate of growth. We will also see the Durable Goods report for December.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 31% (24% the previous week)
→Neutral: 36% (36% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 33% (40% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 2 (Bearish by 16 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communications Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 1.8% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Industrials (two biggest holdings: Raytheon, Honeywell) - down 3.5% for the week
The NASDAQ-100 outperformed the S&P 500 again
Emerging Markets did better than Foreign Developed and US Markets
Small, Mid and Large Cap all performed about the same
Growth stocks were up for the week, Value stocks were down
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 177 and fell by 7 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 124 and rose by 3 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and now right at its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 14.3% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is now above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but remains below its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 23.9% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
The Lowry’s Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Day Moving Average reading fell from an overbought level of 82% to 51%.This important 0-100% reading measures overall positive stock participation. Higher readings indicate increasing positive market momentum, lower readings indicate increasing downside momentum. Extreme readings below 20% and above 80% could potentially point to imminent short term trend reversals.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Are you rich?It’s complicated.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be lightly edited at times for clarity) .
DEBT CEILING
The statutory debt limit, often referred to as the debt ceiling, was the limit set by Congress to the amount of debt that the U.S. government can take on. It also includes interest payments on existing debt. Once the government reaches the statutory debt limit, it cannot take on new obligations.
Under the U.S. Constitution, Congress has the power to borrow money. Prior to 1939, this meant that Congress would pass legislation authorizing the Treasury to issue specific amounts of bonds to raise funds for purposes specified in the legislation.
However, other than these specified amounts of earmarked borrowing, the Treasury was not authorized to borrow money on its own authority, and the U.S. government did not maintain a large revolving debt burden as a normal means of financing ongoing general spending, such as for paying for public services, government salaries, entitlements like Medicare, and tax refunds.
In 1939, Congress passed the Public Debt Act, which, along with subsequent amendments, delegated Congress's power to borrow money to the Treasury as long as the total consolidated federal debt stayed under the statutory debt limit set by the Act. This was a radical break from previous policy, effectively transferring by statute the Constitutionally enumerated power to borrow from the legislative branch to the executive branch of government.
Still, only the U.S. Congress has the authority to raise the statutory debt limit, which it has done more or less routinely though not without occasional contention. Raising the statutory debt limit has occurred 78 times since 1960. Raising the threshold has taken several different forms, such as redefining the debt limit, allowing a temporary extension to the ceiling and permanently raising the limit. The debt limit has been raised 49 times under Republican presidents and 29 times under Democratic presidents.
Though some politicians known as deficit hawks, along with many citizens, disapprove of raising the debt limit, Congress has regularly raised the ceiling to avoid defaulting on already committed government payments.
Opponents of fiscal discipline typically argue that refusing to raise the debt limit would lead to debt default by the Treasury and would be catastrophic for the U.S. economy. They claim that those living on Social Security would not receive their monthly payments, members of the military would go unpaid, large segments of the U.S. economy would experience great upheaval, and an unprecedented national economic crisis would ensue.
This tension has led to several episodes when budget negotiations between fiscal conservatives and other factions in government have broken down, forcing so-called government shutdowns by delaying the Treasury’s ability to continually expand the federal debt. During these episodes, government agencies are usually required to restrict some spending or temporarily suspend some operations.
This leads to what has become known as Washington Monument Syndrome: Government agencies selectively cut back their most popular services so as to cause as much discomfort and outrage among the public as possible, in order to put pressure on lawmakers to take on more public debt.
When Congress opts to raise the debt limit, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) calculates an “X-date” which refers to the day that the government will likely exhaust its debt extension and need to extend the limit further, assuming that it has not increased its income and paid off debts.
The government gets income through taxes, so raising taxes could be one way to increase revenue to pay off debts. Alternatively, the government may choose to cut spending—restricting the funds it spends on infrastructure, the military, etc. The money saved through these cuts can also help prevent raising the debt ceiling. While raising the debt ceiling during times of acute budget pressures tends to be a bipartisan action, theories on ways to avoid it tend to fall more starkly along partisan lines.
The first statutory debt limit set in the U.S. was at $45 billion in 1939. However, Congress raised the ceiling annually during the duration of World War II. By 1946, the limit had reached $300 billion. Over the following decades, it continued to rise as federal government spending, and deficits grew. In 2013, instead of raising the limit, Congress temporarily suspended it, allowing the Treasury to borrow whatever funds it needs to finance government spending.
Temporary suspensions of the debt limit have become the new normal in the federal budgetary process. In a 2019 budget deal between Congress and the Trump administration, the debt limit was suspended for two years, allowing the Treasury to borrow without limit during that period.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any Anglia Advisors communication of any kind. Under no circumstances is any of Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of any information provided therein.
Clients and those associated with Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The highlight of the week, the all-important latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation numbers, came out before the market opened on Thursday and was right in line with forecasts, showing a continued cooling of inflation in the US.
Headline CPI fell 0.1% between November and December, following a 0.1% increase the previous month. Over the past twelve months, the index is up 6.5%, falling from a 7.1% rate a month earlier.
Core CPI, which excludes food and fuel costs, rose by0.3% month-to-month and 5.7% year-on-year, the smallest twelve month gain since late 2021. The previous month, those numbers had been up 0.2% and up 6.0%, respectively. This all appears to imply that inflation may indeed be falling at a faster rate than growth is and that’s exactly what markets want to see.
While stocks broadly reacted quite positively to the data in Thursday’s session, the bond market had more trouble making up its mind. The benchmark 10-Year Treasury interest rate initially traded lower to around 3.47%, a sign that the bond market was happy, but then it moved back up again to around 3.56%, only to reverse course in the late morning and move back down again to close at the low of the day (3.45%).
The strong general market consensus in the immediate aftermath of the CPI report was that the Fed will raise the Fed Funds rate by another 0.25% when it meets on January 31st and February 1st to consider its next interest rate move, with the outcome of the meeting after that on March 15th and 16th still up for debate.
Stocks continued to perform solidly but not spectacularly on Friday going into a three-day weekend, almost as if traders were nervous of being over-optimistic after what had been a broadly positive few days.
Markets had started the week floating slowly higher on not much news in advance of the CPI report. This is a welcome change from most of last year when a lack of news or any other catalyst usually resulted in the default scenario of a steady drift lower.
Those analysts who dragged themselves out of bed early on Tuesday looking for further clues in Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s speech to the Swedish Central Bank in Stockholm were probably left disappointed, although he did reiterate how inflation is the devil, saying that price stability was the “bedrock” of a healthy economy, and how it provides the public with “immeasurable benefits over time”.
The heads of three Federal Reserve banks tried to throw cold water on the idea that recent indications that inflation may be easing will lead policymakers to pull back on raising interest rates and magically pivot to lower rates any time soon.
Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank President Raphael Bostic said he expects interest rates to be above 5% by early in the second quarter and remain there for a “long time”. He said, “We are just going to have to hold our resolve.”
San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President Mary Daly also indicated rates need to go above 5%. She said that the Fed has to continue boosting rates and keep them high “until the job is well and truly done.”
Uber-hawk James Bullard of the St. Louis Fed said that rates should be swiftly moved up to above 5% (at least 0.75% higher than where we are now) and that the Fed should then play game of wait-and-see-what-happens before deciding on the next move.
The market took all these comments in its stride however. As I mentioned last week, many large investors are starting to believe that the Fed’s bark is worse than its bite and are becoming less and less intimidated by what Jerome Powell and his lieutenants are coming out and saying in press conferences and in highly-scripted TV and radio interviews. They are convinced that the Fed will be forced to act based on the data rather than on its own rhetoric.
They also see a (growing?) chance that that data might indicate that inflation is becoming close to under control and that the elusive so-called “soft landing” (inflation conquered without the economy tipping into a damaging recession) can be achieved.
In fact, if you take the last three month’s worth of CPI (admittedly a small, cherry-picked sample, but stay with me here) and annualize it, that implies an annual inflation rate of just 1.6%!
Attention swiftly turned to earnings on Friday as the Q4 2022 season got underway and the initial results were decent enough. Wells Fargo, JP Morgan, Bank of America and Citigroup all gained around 2-3% on Friday after releasing earnings data that can be described as somewhere between adequate and quite good. The generally positive vibes were also bolstered by a report showing a jump in consumer sentiment.
So far, 29 S&P 500 companies have reported Q4 2022 results with 23 of them coming in better than expected. While only a tiny sample size at a very early stage, it is already starting to raise hopes that corporate earnings may not be in quite as much trouble as had been feared. The recent renewed weakness in the US Dollar is helping a lot in regard to forward guidance for many companies.
For the week, the S&P 500 gained a solid 2.7%, and the NASDAQ ran up 4.8%.
OTHER NEWS (Crypto Contagion Edition)
Prosecutors have now said that the extent of the fraud committed by FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried and his henchmen could be so vast and sprawling that the Southern District of New York may not even have enough resources to properly investigate such a massive caseload of theft, bribery, illegal campaign contributions, market manipulation and outright fraud. Another problem is the huge amount of contagion spreading rapidly to other crypto players.
SBF doled out many millions in donations to political parties, academia, selected charities and non-profits at the same time as thieving customer money to illegally pour billions into his hedge fund so that he could invest in often hare-brained, perilous wagers that imploded. He also used these stolen client funds to pay personal expenses associated with a lavish lifestyle for him, his sometimes-girlfriend (who he put in charge of the hedge fund) and a bunch of his crypto-bro buddies in a drug-soaked frat-house in the Caribbean, according to federal prosecutors and regulators.
Now, according to the Wall Street Journal, the new FTX management is asking for these political and corporate donations back in an attempt to recoup money for FTX’s nine million customers who collectively lost billions of dollars when the exchange collapsed. Some recipients of this dirty money have voluntarily returned it, but the others reportedly face legal action if they do not immediately do the same.
The closest thing the crypto market has to a central bank is Silvergate Capital which is the biggest provider of banking and lending services to firms in the space. It has not had a good start to 2023. As the unregulated crypto ecosystem has collapsed under the weight of rampant fraud on the part of many of the sector’s incompetent participants, Silvergate was forced to lay off 40% of its staff as depositors pulled out over $8 billion from Silvergate accounts (about 70% of its total deposits).
Even the madly wild risk-takers at ARK Invest disclosed that they had sold over $5 million-worth of Silvergate Capital stock (SI). Congressional investigations into the firm’s culture and practices are ongoing as part of the whole FTX case.
Additionally, Silvergate reportedly incurred a $718 million loss while being forced to sell $5.2 billion worth of reserves (bonds) to satisfy some of those withdrawal requests. The firm was worth over $6 billion as recently as late 2021, but is now worth less than $370 million after its stock price fell 95%. These are absolutely mind-bending losses for any company, but especially for one that was supposed to be crypto’s grown-up in the room. Last week, JP Morgan down-graded the outlook for the stock and more than halved its price target.
Coinbase said that it would eliminate around 20% of its staff and is being forced into a broad cost-cutting exercise. CEO Brian Armstrong specifically blamed SBF for the difficulties at his own firm, saying it was primarily due to “unscrupulous actors" and spoke of “further contagion” in the crypto marketplace. The battered publicly-traded stock (COIN) recovered somewhat following the announcement.
There also continues to be an avalanche of alarming revelations about what is going on at crypto lender Genesis, which is under federal investigation and is holding hostage almost a billion dollars of trapped client funds that the company refuses to release to account holders who are trying to withdraw their money and it announced that it was firing over a third of its staff.
Chapter 11 bankruptcy (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) could well be in Genesis’ near future, according to many analysts and that could mean potential financial catastrophe for those account holders.
UNDER THE HOOD:
We are now in an eerily similar technical set-up to where we were back in August last year, when the S&P 500 had gained back half of its then-bear market losses, which some hailed as a “guaranteed bet” on a new uptrend beginning. In addition, the index was in the midst of a strong upward trajectory and was a single trading day away from crossing back above its critical 200-day moving average. On that occasion, everything quickly fell apart and by October we were at new lows again for the year. That is not a prediction of what will happen this time but a cautionary tale about what might.
Consequently, we need to look very carefully at what the technicals are telling us. Buying Power and Selling Pressure Indexes are among the indicators that have begun to demonstrate more promising movements. Selling Pressure has dropped sharply to levels not seen since those heady days of last August. This illustrates a lack of desire on the part of investors to sell. Check. At the same time, Buying Power has ticked higher to test its mid-November multi-month high, illustrating that Demand has seemingly outpaced the gains of the major price indexes. Check.
This is rather healthy price action, although we would like to see more wild, frenzied and indiscriminate buying than is currently being observed.
Although the short-term rally appears intact for now, it is approaching potentially significant levels of overhead Supply and stocks may be short term overbought. And we still need to remember that this rally is happening in the context of a still-dominant cyclical overall downtrend which could soon spoil the bulls’ fun.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday for Martin Luther King Day.
It will be a busy rest of the week with a bunch of Q4 2022 earnings reports, including those from Netflix, Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, Morgan Stanley, United Airlines, Charles Schwab, Prologis and Schlumberger.
The main event on the economic data calendar will be on Wednesday when the overall inflation picture will become a little clearer after the release of the latest Producer Price Index (PPI) reading of wholesale inflation experienced by manufacturers for their raw materials. Expectations for the headline index are for a 6.8% rise from a year earlier and for Core PPI (ex-food and energy costs) to have increased 5.4%.
We will also get Retail Sales data this week.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 24% (20% the previous week)
→Neutral: 36% (38% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 40% (42% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 16 (Bearish by 22 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 5.8% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor & Gamble, Pepsico) - down 1.5% for the week
The NASDAQ-100 outperformed the S&P 500
Foreign Developed Markets finished ahead of both US and Emerging Markets
Small Cap did better than Mid or Large Cap
Growth stocks did better than Value stocks
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 184 and rose by 19 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 121 and fell by 21 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is now above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and also slightly above its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 14.3% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is now above its 50-day moving average but still below its 90-day and its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 26.0% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
The Lowry’s Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Day Moving Average reading rose steeply from 43% to 82%.This important 0-100% reading measures overall positive stock participation. Higher readings indicate increasing positive market momentum, lower readings indicate increasing downside momentum. Extreme readings below 20% and above 80% could potentially point to imminent short term trend reversals.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK: This article describes some of the ways that some of the provisions of the recent SECURE Act 2.0 may have tipped the balance in favor of Roth IRAs and Roth 401(k)s over Traditional ones.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY
Chapter 11 is a form of bankruptcy that involves a reorganization of a debtor’s business affairs, debts, and assets, and for that reason is known as "reorganization" bankruptcy.
Named after the U.S. bankruptcy code 11, corporations generally file Chapter 11 if they require time to restructure their debts. This version of bankruptcy gives the debtor a fresh start. However, the terms are subject to the debtor’s fulfillment of its obligations under the plan of reorganization.
Chapter 11 bankruptcy is the most complex of all bankruptcy cases. It is also usually the most expensive form of a bankruptcy proceeding. For these reasons, a company must consider Chapter 11 reorganization only after careful analysis and exploration of all other possible alternatives.
During a Chapter 11 proceeding, the court will help a business restructure its debts and obligations. In most cases, the firm remains open and operating. Many large U.S. companies file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and stay afloat. Such businesses include automobile giant General Motors, the airline United Airlines, retail outlet K-mart, and thousands of other corporations of all sizes.
Corporations, partnerships, and limited liability companies (LLCs) usually file Chapter 11, but in rare cases, individuals with a lot of debt who do not qualify for Chapter 7 or 13 may be eligible for Chapter 11. However, the process is not a speedy one.
A business in the midst of filing Chapter 11 may continue to operate. In most cases the debtor, called a “debtor in possession,” runs the business as usual. However, in cases involving fraud, dishonesty, or gross incompetence, a court-appointed trustee steps in to run the company throughout the entire bankruptcy proceedings.
The business is not able to make some decisions without the permission of the courts. These include the sale of assets, other than inventory, starting or terminating a rental agreement, and stopping or expanding business operations. The court also has control over decisions related to retaining and paying attorneys and entering contracts with vendors and unions. Finally, the debtor cannot arrange a loan that will commence after the bankruptcy is complete.
In Chapter 11, the individual or business filing bankruptcy has the first chance to propose a reorganization plan. These plans may include downsizing business operations to reduce expenses, as well as renegotiating debts. In some cases, plans involve liquidating all assets to repay creditors. If the chosen path is feasible and fair, the courts accept it, and the process moves forward.
The Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, which went into effect on Feb. 19, 2020, added a new subchapter V to Chapter 11 designed to make bankruptcy easier for small businesses, which are “defined as entities with less than about $2.7 million in debts that also meet other criteria,” according to the U.S. Department of Justice.
The act “imposes shorter deadlines for completing the bankruptcy process, allows for greater flexibility in negotiating restructuring plans with creditors, and provides for a private trustee who will work with the small business debtor and its creditors to facilitate the development of a consensual plan of reorganization.”
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it constitute a guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decision. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post. Under no circumstances is any of our content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients and those associated with Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The calendar may have flipped, but the song remains the same.
Last week was something of a microcosm of 2022; a steady downward grind for the most part, occasionally punctuated by a sharp spike. Last year these spikes all failed to trigger a true turnaround, always eventually fizzling out and leading to subsequent further new lows. It remains to be seen if that pattern will continue or benefit from the so-called “January Effect” (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK, below).
Many of the market’s big dogs stumbled right out of the gate in 2023’s opening few sessions.
Apple (AAPL) stock got punished early in the week following a report that the company is telling suppliers to reduce production of some components because of a decline in demand.
Microsoft (MSFT) fell hard on Wednesday as analysts downgraded the stock and cut the price target, pointing to growing weakness in the company’s Azure cloud computing and Office 365 businesses.
Tesla (TSLA) reported far fewer vehicle deliveries than anticipated and the stock price continued its apparently relentless meltdown.
Meta/Facebook (META) continues to get slammed and fined by European regulators for its perceived anti-privacy measures.
Amazon (AMZN) announced it was being forced to lay off more than 18,000 employees, a larger total than anticipated and the most in the company's history.
Walgreens/Boots (WBA) shares sank more than 6% on Thursday as the largest US pharmacy chain posted a quarterly loss after taking a $5.2 billion charge to pay for opioid-related claims and litigation.
Analysts searched in vain through the minutes of the last Fed meeting that were released on Wednesday for a sign that indicated that committee members have any plans to ease up on their inflation-busting crusade anytime soon. They found, to their disappointment, that everyone was largely consistent with Chair Jerome Powell's public hawkish rhetoric, apparently unanimous in their view that there will be no interest rate cuts this year.
On Friday we learned from the Jobs Report that the US economy gained 223k jobs last month, more than the 200k economists had anticipated after a rise of 256k in November. The unemployment rate unexpectedly fell to 3.5% compared to forecasts of an unchanged 3.7%.
This evidence of a continued tight labor market seems on the surface to undermine recent encouraging inflation indicators and it initially increased expectations for a 0.50% hike in February and a Terminal Rate (the rate in place at the time that the Fed eventually stops hiking) above 5%.
But the data also showed that the rise in wage growth, average hourly earnings, eased meaningfully last month, suggesting that inflation is slowing and the market chose to focus on this side of things, resulting in stocks roaring higher to end the week, flipping the indexes from a losing week to a winning one.
Last summer, I identified what I believe to be the three most important keys to stock prices bottoming out. As 2023 kicks off, it seems like a good time to check in and see where we stand with them all.
#1. Inflation Peaks and Declines and We Get to Peak Fed Hawkishness**
By far the most important one and the one with the most moving parts. How we’ll know: the Core Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index begin to meaningfully decline. If year-on-year CPI can get back down near 3%-5% within the first several months of 2023, that will likely lead the Fed to a position of peak hawkishness whereby the interest rate hikes stop which could help to form a sustainable bottom in stock prices.
The latest: The market is telling us, via fed fund futures trading, that it simply doesn’t believe the Fed and that it thinks that peak Fed hawkishness will occur sometime in early-to-mid-2023 and that the Fed will be forced to pivot to actually lowering interest rates sooner rather than later. The Fed is resisting this narrative and has denied that its hawkish stance is necessarily close to an end or that interest rate cuts will happen in 2023.
We will see who is right. Headline inflation has likely topped out, but we need to see a continued decline in all the inflation metrics (especially service sector inflation) and a labor market deterioration (increased unemployment) to make the market’s case over the Fed’s.
“Hawkishness” meaning favoring the aggressive prioritization of bringing down inflation by means of continuously raising interest rates
#2: Chinese Lockdowns Ease and Growth Recovers
How we’ll know: China COVID cases drop, the abandonment of Zero-COVID measures is maintained, its currency moves back towards 6.50 to the dollar and economic growth approaches pre-COVID levels.
The latest: There has been material progress towards achieving this part of this key over the past several weeks, as the authorities have clearly abandoned “Zero-COVID” and are openly stepping up efforts to bolster economic growth. However, the inevitable massive spike in COVID cases is causing Chinese citizens to choose to restrict their movements and holding economic growth way below pre-COVID levels. The process is, however, ongoing and this key could well be achieved during the first half of 2023.
#3: Geopolitical Tensions Decline
How we’ll know: Oil and other commodities will drop to pre-Ukraine war levels. Update: It’s a strange one. Global commodity prices have indeed fallen (some quite hard) but these price declines have most definitely not been the result of reduced geopolitical tensions, but rather as the result of the perceived rising odds of a global recession and the accompanying demand destruction. Regarding geopolitics, fighting rages on in Ukraine with no near-term end in sight. However, there is talk of a UN organized summit in February that would be aimed at establishing at least a ceasefire, although it’s too early to get optimistic about that.
While it can be said that progress has been made on all three of these key indicators and we are in better shape than when I first started discussing them, we probably need them all to be satisfied to be able to call that the bottom may be in. We continue to play the waiting game.
OTHER NEWS
How’s that whole HODL thing working out? .. Bed, Bath and Beyond (BBBY) was a one-time favorite of the Reddit meme stock army of now mostly-former novice day traders (the majority of whom probably have lower net worths now than they did in 2019) who deluded themselves into thinking that they knew what they were doing in 2021. The company announced last week that it is preparing to file for bankruptcy and the stock promptly fell 30% on Thursday and then another 20% on Friday and is now down almost 99% from its all-time high. Yet again, gullible retail HODLers are left holding the bag and institutional Wall Street wins for the umpteenth time.
UK politics; “Look at us, we’re crazy!”, US politics; “Hold my beer,” .. The mindless s**t-show in the House of Representatives last week is quite properly being disregarded by financial markets at the moment as unimportant noise, but it is a clear and ominous warning that severe political dysfunction could well inject volatility into asset markets at some point later this year. This risk is amplified by the presence of some elected members who seem prepared to just burn the whole thing down, come what may. At a minimum, another nasty debt ceiling showdown sometime in the next twelve months should surprise no-one.
UNDER THE HOOD:
While the technical evidence still points to a further decline to new lows for the market in general, there is one technical effect happening right now that may give cause for optimism.
Longer term readers may recall that, throughout 2021, while the major indexes were rising in almost a straight line upward, this report was among those which pointed out that in fact the entire universe of US stocks had topped out as early as early March of that year. The majority of stocks were in distinct, even substantial, downtrends for the rest of the year while the headline indexes kept climbing.
Why was this? Because the the weighting of the indexes was (and still is) dominated by a handful of monster-sized firms who were still doing extraordinarily well, while the stock prices of literally thousands of other companies were entering a steep decline. The effect was that the indexes only began to fall many months after the average stock had started to sink. The performance of the largest companies artificially propped up the index prices for ages, so the under-the-surface crumbling decline remained invisible to most investors.
There is an argument to be made that the exact opposite may be happening right now. The indexes are having a hard time recovering, while a decent number of stocks are starting to pick themselves up off the floor, particularly smaller stocks in certain more value-oriented parts of the market, away from large cap growth and tech. The indexes are struggling, the argument goes, precisely because those same names that propped them up in 2021 are now causing a drag because so many of them are going through such disproportionately difficult times (see earlier for example) that there is now a positive underlying story of recovery that may be invisible to investors because of the dominance of the big guys in index construction.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
The holidays are over and next week will be a busy one for investors with the start of Q4 2022 earnings season. But the mammoth news will be the release of the latest inflation data.
Earning season kicks off on Friday, with results from several big banks and other notable companies including Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Delta Air Lines, and UnitedHealth Group.
On Thursday, we get the report on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for December. Expectations are for no change month-on-month, implying a 6.6% year-on-year increase, which would be a decrease from November’s 7.1% annualized.
The critical Core CPI, which excludes food and energy prices, is expected to have risen 0.3% from November to December, for a one-year gain of 5.7%, down from the 6.0% annualized for November.
We’ll also get to see the University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index, which is expected to be up at least slightly from the prior month.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 20% (26% the previous week)
→Neutral: 38% (26% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 42% (48% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 22 (Bearish by 22 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communications Services (two biggest holdings: Meta/Facebook, Google) - up 5.0% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Duke Energy) - down 0.9% for the week
The S&P 500 did a little better than the NASDAQ-100
Emerging and Foreign Developed Markets finished ahead of US Markets
Large Cap lagged Mid and Small
Value stocks were nicely up for the week, Growth stocks were flat at best
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 165 and rose by 11 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 142 and fell by 13 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is now right at its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but still below its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 17.6% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is still well below its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 30.6% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
The Lowry’s Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Day Moving Average reading rose from 40% to 43%.This important 0-100% reading measures overall positive stock participation. Higher readings indicate increasing positive market momentum, lower readings indicate increasing downside momentum. Extreme readings below 20% and above 80% could potentially point to imminent short term trend reversals.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK: I published two pieces of content of my own last week. One was a Q4 2022 financial market review and the other was titled “I Bonds: What You Need To Know”.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
THE “JANUARY EFFECT”
The January Effect is a perceived seasonal increase in stock prices during the month of January. Analysts generally attribute this rally to an increase in buying, which follows the drop in price that typically happens in December when investors, engaging in tax-loss harvesting to offset realized capital gains, prompt a sell-off.
Another possible explanation is that investors use year-end cash bonuses to purchase investments the following month. While this market anomaly has been identified in the past, the January Effect seems to have largely disappeared as its presence became widely known.
Indeed, our own look back at the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) since its 1993 inception makes one wonder how the term ever came to be used. Of the 30 years since 1993, there have been 17 winning January months (57%) and 13 losing January months (43%), making the odds of a gain only slightly higher than the flip of a coin. Further, since the start of the 2009 market rally through January 2022, January months showed eight winners vs. six losers, again a split of 57% to 43%. Given the strong rally from 2009, one might rightly expect a more pronounced number of January winners, but this is not the case.
Traders should be aware of the tenuous nature of the January Effect and instead focus on the market conditions at the time and what they suggest for the overall short-term direction of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF.
The January Effect is a hypothesis, and like all calendar-related effects, it suggests that the markets as a whole are inefficient, as efficient markets would naturally make this effect non-existent. The January Effect seems to affect small caps more than mid-caps or large caps because they are less liquid.
Since the beginning of the 20th century, the data suggests that these asset classes have outperformed the overall market in January, especially toward the middle of the month. Investment banker Sidney Wachtel first noticed this effect in 1942.
This historical trend, however, has been less pronounced in recent years because the markets seem to have adjusted for it.
Another reason analysts consider the January Effect less important as of 2022 is that more people are using tax-sheltered retirement plans and therefore have no reason to sell at the end of the year for a tax loss.
Beyond tax-loss harvesting and repurchases, as well as investors putting cash bonuses into the market, another explanation for the January Effect has to do with investor psychology. Some investors believe that January is the best month to begin an investment program or perhaps are following through on a New Year's resolution to begin investing for the future.
Others have posited that mutual fund managers purchase stocks of top performers at the end of the year and eliminate questionable losers for the sake of appearance in their year-end reports, an activity known as "window dressing." This is unlikely, however, as the buying and selling would primarily affect large caps.
Year-end sell-offs also attract buyers interested in the lower prices, knowing that the dips are not based on company fundamentals. On a large scale, this can drive prices higher in January.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute a guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post. Under no circumstances is it ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
To reiterate what I said last week, the absolutely key question when it comes to financial markets in 2023 is: Will inflation fall faster than economic growth and earnings?
Mark your calendars for when we will get the next hints at an answer ..
Thursday, January 12th when the US Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation is released. Why It’s Important: The key for the next CPI report (and every CPI report in 2023) is solid evidence of continued downward momentum in inflation. Specifically, the headline CPI number turning negative month-over-month (down from the 0.1% increase last month) and the year-over-year reading falling below last month’s 7.1%. Even more important than headline CPI, however, is the Core CPI reading as it give us a better view of service sector inflation. Markets will want to see tangible declines from the 0.2% month-over-month and 6.0% year-over-year increases that we saw for November. If we see this hoped-for trajectory, stocks could definitely begin to pick themselves up off the floor. A failure on the part of the CPI data to come through with these improvements, however, could be very damaging indeed.
Friday, January 13th through Friday, January 27th which is the meat of the Q4 2022 earnings season.Why It’s Important: One of the main reasons stocks dropped in December was the growing concern about the likely state of corporate earnings in 2023. If the general tendency of Q4 earnings is disappointing, that will begin to weigh heavily on stocks. Conversely, if earnings are more resilient than currently feared, then that will be an early positive catalyst.
Bottom Line: Markets enter 2023 at an important transition point. One path is paved with continued disinflation, resilient earnings, gently moderating growth, a more balanced labor market with higher unemployment and rising stock and bond prices. The other path is paved with sticky inflation, rapidly slowing growth, a continued tight labor market with low unemployment and continually falling stock and bond prices. These two data points in January will offer important clues as to towards which path the markets are heading.
Nothing new was really added to the overall narrative during what was a low-volume trading week with a somewhat negative feel to it. Traders trickled back from the holiday break on Tuesday, with exactly the same lack of excitement for growth-focused stocks that they've had for pretty much all of 2022. Markets churned back and forth aimlessly all week.
A daily average of only around 3 billion shares changed hands on the New York Stock Exchange last week versus the year-to-date average of more than 4.6 billion. Low trading volume can exacerbate daily moves, there are just fewer traders at their desks inclined to step in and counter any trend that develops.
The final grisly scorecard for calendar year 2022 was a 19% decline for the S&P 500, its biggest pullback since 2008 and fourth worst year in its history, and a 33% decline for the NASDAQ, also its worst year since 2008. And add to that, of course, a collapse in government bond prices as yields spiked with the Fed’s aggressive interest rate hiking policy as well as the implosion of the whole crypto eco-system in a mushroom cloud of fraud and deceit.
There is an unfortunate behavioral tendency early in a calendar year that can be summed up in the expression: “things had better improve quickly or I’m out”, referring of course to clients throwing in the towel and selling out of stock positions because the turnaround does not appear imminent. This is, of course, the exact opposite of what is sensible, but many people still do it.
We are experiencing historic times in financial markets. Most investors have some kind of a combination of both stocks and bonds. The year that just ended was the most difficult for stocks since 2008 and the worst year for bonds in any of our lifetimes. Both at the same time!!
Never before in history have both stocks and bonds both fallen by double-digits in the same calendar year. That makes it a really, really bad time to sell if you don’t have to. It also makes it a really, really good time to buy stock ETFs if you have a long term horizon.
Market history is extremely clear: Periods like this provide opportunities to help secure your long term financial future, as long as you resist the urge for short term protection at the expense of longer term gains. The actions you take at times like this determine the end-balance of money available to you in the far future to a much greater degree than the actions you take during those years when stocks are moving higher all the time (almost every year from 2009-2021 for example!). There is definitely light at the end of the tunnel but the problem is that we have no idea how long this current tunnel may be.
While we can never know where we’re going, we ought to try to understand where we are. The goal of this weekly report (and the quarterly market reviews, look out for the next one sometime this week) is to help you recognize why markets are falling at the moment, but also to show you what I believe likely needs to in place for this bear market to finally end (there is a legitimate path to a rebound in early 2023, not an easy one, but it does exist) and also to put everything in a proper long term context.
OTHER NEWS
Stock-pickers just suck .. Just in case there’s anyone left on the planet who still thinks that picking stocks is a profitable endeavor in the long term,a report in the New York Times showed that, over the last five years, not a single actively-managed mutual fund in the US beat the market regularly, using the definition that S&P Dow Jones Indices has employed for two decades.
The S&P Dow Jones team looked at all 2,132 actively-managed domestic stock mutual funds (non-index funds that have professional human fund managers picking the stocks in the fund) that had been operating for at least twelve months as of June 2018, excluding very narrowly-focused sector funds and leveraged funds that, essentially, use borrowed money to magnify their returns.
The team selected the 25 percent of the funds with the best performance over the twelve months through June 2018. Then the analysts asked how many of those funds remained in the top quarter for the four succeeding twelve-month periods through June 2022.
The answer was none.
Not a single one of the actively-managed funds in the US managed to achieve top-quartile performance for five successive years. Then they did the same thing for actively-managed fixed income funds and came up with the same result: zero. Not a single bond fund was in the top quarter when it came to performance for five 12-month periods.
The inevitable conclusion: those fund managers who did make it into the top quartile from time-to-time simply got lucky for a year or two. They benefited from unsustainably good fortune for a while - and it always ran out. If it was down to skill, then why did it never, ever persist?
Then the researchers used a far easier test with a much lower bar. How many funds ended up in the top 50 percent all five years? How many simply did better the median for five years in a row?
For those 2,132 funds, the answer was .. a dismal one percent!
Consider a school with 210 students in a class. Not all the high performers will always score in the top 25 percent of their class every single year for five years, but you’d expect that at least some would. And if only two kids in the whole class showed above-average performance every year for five years, I’d begin to think that there was something seriously wrong at the school.
Growth vs.Value is not even a debate right now, with little sign of change .. Tesla’s price meltdown (it cratered almost 70% in 2022) has pushed it out of the top ten US companies by market value. As of last week it was in 16th place and dropping further down the charts like a stone.
The stock’s collapse continues to infect the whole high growth / tech / communications sector which had a brutal 2022. The Vanguard Value Stock ETF had declined only 2% year-to-date while the Vanguard Growth Stock ETF is down 33% (see this week’s EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below for more detail of the difference). There’s very little to suggest that this trend won’t continue into 2023, indeed plenty to suggest that it will.
For Growth stocks to flourish, it needs a set-up of: 1) quickly falling or at least steadily low interest rates, 2) at least a “normal” pace economic growth, and 3) geopolitical calm. We have quite literally the opposite of all those right now.
By the very nature of its construction, the S&P 500 is heavily overweight growth stocks, which is why its performance tends more towards that of the Growth ETF than the Value one.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Unsurprisingly, last week was characterized by typical seasonal choppy action and well below-average volume. However, sector performance greatly favored defensive areas at the expense of growth ones.
Lowry’s core technical indicators have been in decline for months but it is worth noting that the ranks of the most beaten-down stocks (those 30% or more below their highs) started expanding yet again last week. Masses of new lows like this are simply not bullish or indicative of selling exhaustion when they do not come during a panicky, all-encompassing selling climax.
The 2022 closing high for the S&P 500 was set on the first day of trading on January 3rd at 4796.56 and it has been all downhill from there. Now, with the NASDAQ Composite, led by fallen angels Apple, Amazon and particularly Tesla, reaching fresh 2022 lows just last week and many important stocks now below even their COVID-era lows, it’s pretty safe to say that the primary down-trend is back in charge and that the bears are not done with us yet.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This trading week will be another holiday-shortened one, with stock and bond markets closed on Monday in observance of New Year's Day. Once Wall Street returns, there will be a handful of earnings releases from the last of the Q3 stragglers such as Walgreens and Conagra before attention turns swiftly and decisively to the Q4 releases which will start to arrive on January 13th.
The big economic data highlight of the week will be the Jobs Report on Friday. A gain of 217k jobs in December is expected, following an increase of 263k in November. The closely-watched unemployment rate is forecast to hold steady at a historically low 3.7%.
Before then, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) will come out and provide some context to how the labor market is looking. Estimates call for 10 million job openings on the last business day of November, which would be 334k fewer than in October.
Analysts will also be poring over the minutes from the latest Federal Open Market Committee's monetary policy meeting this week for clues as to the committee’s mindset and degree of unanimity among members about current policy .
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 26% (20% the previous week)
→Neutral: 26% (28% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 48% (52% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 22 (Bearish by 32 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) for the third week in a row - up 3.1% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Air Products and Chemicals) - down 1.3% for the week
The S&P 500 was just positive for the week vs NASDAQ-100 just negative
US Markets finished just ahead of International Developed and Emerging Markets
Large, Mid and Small Caps all did about the same
Value stocks were just up for the week, Growth stocks were slightly down
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 154 and fell by 1 point last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 155 and fell by 1 point over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also still below its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 20% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is still a long way below its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 33.7% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
The Lowry’s Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Day Moving Average reading rose from 27% to 40%.This important 0-100% reading measures overall positive stock participation. Higher readings indicate increasing positive market momentum, lower readings indicate increasing downside momentum. Extreme readings below 20% and above 80% could potentially point to imminent short term trend reversals.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK: From a fellow financial planner, a list of very commonly misunderstood concepts in personal finance and investing. Did you once believe any of these?
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
GROWTH STOCKS , VALUE STOCKS AND INCOME STOCKS
Investors who buy stocks typically do so for one of two reasons: They believe that the price will rise and allow them to sell the stock at a profit, or they intend to collect the dividends paid on the stock as investment income. Of course, some stocks can satisfy both objectives, at least to some extent, but most stocks can be classified into one of three categories: growth, income or value. Those who understand the characteristics of each type of stock can use this knowledge to grow their portfolios more efficiently.
As the name implies, growth stocksby definition are those that have substantial potential for growth in the foreseeable future. Growth companies may currently be growing at a faster rate than the overall markets, and they often devote most of their current revenue toward further expansion. Every sector of the market has growth companies, but they are more prevalent in some areas such as technology, alternative energy, and biotechnology.
Most growth stocks tend to be newer companies with innovative products that are expected to make a big impact on the market in the future, but there are exceptions. Some growth companies are simply very well-run entities with good business models that have capitalized on the demand for their products. Growth stocks can provide substantial returns on capital, but many of them are smaller, less-stable companies that may also experience severe price declines.
Undervalued companies can often provide long-term profits for those who do their homework. A value stocktrades at a price below where it appears it should be based on its financial status and technical trading indicators. It may have high dividend payout ratios or low financial ratios such as price-to-book or price-earnings ratios. The stock price may also have dropped due to public perception regarding factors that have little to do with the company’s current operations.
For example, the stock price of a well-run, financially sound company may drop substantially for a short time period if the company CEO becomes embroiled in a serious personal scandal. Smart investors know that this may be a good time to buy the stock, as there is a chance that the public will eventually forget about the incident and the price will possibly revert to its previous level.
Of course, the definition of what exactly is a good value for a given stock is somewhat subjective and varies according to the investor’s philosophy and point of view. Value stocks are typically considered to carry less risk than growth stocks because they are usually those of larger, more-established companies. However, their prices do not always return to their previous higher levels as expected.
Some investors also look to income stocks to bolster their fixed-income portfolios with dividend yields that typically exceed those of guaranteed instruments such as Treasury securities or CDs.
There are two main types of income stocks. Utility stocks are common stocks that have historically remained fairly stable in price but usually pay competitive dividends.Preferred stocks are hybrid securities that behave more like bonds than stocks. They often have a call or put features or other characteristics, but also pay competitive yields.
Although income stocks can be an attractive alternative for investors unwilling to risk their principal, their values can decline when interest rates rise.
There is no one right way to discover these specific types of stocks. Those who want growth can peruse investing websites or bulletin boards for lists of growth companies, then do their own homework on them. Many analysts also publish blogs and newsletters that discuss stocks in each of the three categories.
Investors looking for income can calculate the dividend yields on common and preferred offerings, and then evaluate the amount of risk in the security. There are also stock screening programs available that investors can use to search for stocks according to specific criteria, such as dividend yields or financial ratios.
Bottom line: Stocks can provide a return on capital from future growth, current undervaluation or dividend income. Many stocks offer some combination of these and smart investors know that dividends can make a substantial difference in the total return they receive.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute a guarantee of any future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post. Under no circumstances is it ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The much-anticipated Santa Claus Rally window came and went last week with only more volatility and a lot of lower prices to show for it. With hardly any discernable meaningful catalysts and a lot of end of year tax-loss selling going on, there simply wasn’t much to stop stocks from rolling over early in the week. Wednesday (good) and Thursday (bad) basically cancelled each other out. Friday was a moderately decent low-volume snooze-fest.
As we begin the transition that I highlighted last week (investors shifting to taking note of what data actually shows about inflation and the economy, as opposed to exclusively caring only about how the Fed might react) we are frequently experiencing conflicts when it comes to an assessment of what we are actually looking at.
For example, the Fed’s most beloved set of indicators, the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) last week showed its particular version of inflation (ex- food and energy prices) as moving 0.2% higher from October to November and up by 4.7% from a year ago. This showed inflation decelerating more than expected. Good news, right?
Well, yes, but it also showed that over the same period, Americans’ spending slowed substantially, up just 0.1% - a stat that just weeks ago would have fit the “bad news is good news” narrative and taken as evidence that the Fed could react to that by easing up on interest rate hikes. Nowadays it is being seen for what it really is; evidence that the pace of consumer spending is falling and could soon be in a tailspin. Newsflash: that isn’t good for stocks.
The report also showed that earnings for the average American were up 0.4% month over month, exceeding the rate of inflation, muddling the message even further.
I’m not trying to imply that Fed rhetoric or policy doesn’t matter, it absolutely still does. But as we enter 2023, it’s no longer going to be the single most important factor for this simple reason: The Fed will have to react to the data just like it did in 2022. And if inflation and growth both fall fast enough, then the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will definitely stop tightening, whatever they may say in speeches and press conferences.
But inflation data has to fall faster than economic data, otherwise we’re looking at stagflation and a potential huge Fed policy mistake. Thursday and Friday’s data implied that the opposite is happening right now; growth estimates are falling faster than inflation. And the bond market is screaming the imminent arrival of a recession by means of the persistently inverted yield curve (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below).
The good news (for the Fed, at least) is that interest rate hikes are totally wrecking the real estate market - as emphasized by the continued, worse-than-expected decline in housing metrics released last week, including sales of existing homes slumping 7.7% from October to November, the tenth consecutive month of declines and now down more than 35% from this time last year.
The median sales price of a house in the US fell more than 10% from June to November to $370,700. Building permit applications for privately-owned housing units crashed 11.2% over the course of the last month and are now over 22% below the level of a year ago.
All this shows just how much the vastly increased cost of borrowing has utterly destroyed demand and sentiment among both homebuyers and homebuilders. But the Fed wants to see this interest rate-related demand destruction move beyond just housing. At some point it likely will, and that's why the worries about an upcoming recession are so widespread and continue to cast a shadow over stock prices.
This has been a year in which all the world's major central banks engineered a serious pivot toward higher interest rates and tighter money. Almost all, that is. Until last Tuesday, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) stood out as the exception to the rule.
In a surprise move and a sign that the war on inflation is now truly a worldwide affair, it “loosened its yield curve control" which is a central bank-y way of saying it will allow market interest rates to drift higher before it intervenes to cap out any rise. That tolerance cap for the ten year bond went up from 0.25% to 0.50%.
It may not look like like much, but it’s a pretty epic policy shift from the BOJ, which has been supporting easy money for many, many years. And despite recent calls from Japanese government officials to raise rates, it has refused to budge until now.
This move raises the value of the yen at the expense of the US dollar. Corporate America has been crying out for a fall in the value of the US currency, which has soared since early 2021, to help with exports - so the effect of the BOJ’s actions could even be a net positive for US stocks.
Last week I identified the two key questions that will dominate the assessment of stock market direction in early 2023 as being:
1) How fast will inflation decline?
2) How bad will the economy get?
This week I want to show more precisely what we need to see (and when) to answer those questions properly.
ThePositive Answer: < 5.0% year-on-year before April. The Negative Answer: > 5.0% after April.
The Positive Answer: > 4.0% before March. The Negative Answer: < 4.0% after March.
The good news is that if both these questions are answered positively, then the bottom in stocks could well be in by the end of next quarter. On the other hand, if they’re answered negatively, then more new lows aren’t just likely, they’re almost certain.
This is my final report of 2022 .. I have often expressed the futility of looking forward using forecasts, but I am a big fan of the learning opportunities derived from looking back, so I will shortly be sending my Q4 review.
This has not been an easy year in the markets, to put it mildly. The fact that stocks now seem to be defying the traditional Santa Claus Rally is a sign that those difficulties could well continue into next year.
I do want to emphasize, however, that every single time we have had to endure a period like this in the markets, it has ultimately yielded generational buying opportunities to help longer term investors secure their financial futures and I’m very confident that this is the case this time as well.
Hopefully in 2023 and beyond, this weekly report will be a part of helping guide clients and subscribers towards that security.
OTHER NEWS
Payback is a b*h .. America’s most despicable and worst behaved bank, Wells Fargo, agreed to pay a colossal fine to settle allegations that it defrauded its customers in its fake account scandal that dates back as far as when Justin Bieber was advising you to love yourself in 2016. The settlement includes a $1.7 billion penalty, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)’s largest-ever fine, and more than $2 billion in consumer restitution.
The bank is still facing further scrutiny and possible further penalties and sanctions from multiple other regulators more than six years after its astonishing illicit behavior came into public view. It deliberately assessed illegitimate fees and interest charges on loans for cars and homes so that many bank customers had their vehicles illegally repossessed while others had overdraft and other penalty fees unlawfully applied.
In any other sector, such behavior would result in the institution being completely shut down and its officers jailed. It’s still beyond me why anyone still has anything to do with Wells Fargo.
Bow-cession? .. Manufacturers and sellers of those oversized red or green bows that you see sitting on the hoods and roofs of holiday-gifted cars have reported a steep decline in business this holiday season, according to the Wall Street Journal. Car dealer inventories have been low due to supply-chain holdups, which means fewer cars on the lot to crown with a bow. On top of that, the high price of new cars has more drivers opting to instead purchase the car they have been leasing.
Big Retirement Plan Changes Coming .. Congress passed an omnibus bill on Friday, known as SECURE 2.0 after the original, dreadfully-named Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act of 2019 on Friday that includes a number of measures to help people save more for retirement and able to leave their retirement savings untouched and untaxed for longer.
Once I have had a chance to pore through the details, I plan on shortly sending out my take and an easy-to-read summary of what the changes will mean to you. Stand by.
UNDER THE HOOD:
If we examine stock price charts, there is very little holiday cheer to be found. And the deeper we look under the hood, the less there is. In fact, there have been developments in technical readings over recent weeks that indicate that sellers have really woken up.
I have frequently referred to the classic market bottom scenario when investors throw in the towel, sell almost anything and everything and rapidly force prices down to significantly depressed levels where buyers finally see real value and come roaring in with indiscriminate, irresistible and sustained buying.
We are just not seeing that. When sellers do get active, the response of the buyers has been mostly pretty pathetic. A few days (or, very occasionally, weeks) of rather lukewarm rebound buying and then they crawl back under their rocks, allowing the sellers back into the ascendancy.
While oversold conditions are becoming apparent in several short-term indicators, the slight bounce that we may be experiencing is likely to be only fleeting and unlikely to be sustained, according to the deteriorating technical indicators. On the contrary, technical probabilities suggest that any rebound could well soon give way to another down-leg.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Stock and bond markets are closed on Monday for the Christmas holiday.
Unsurprisingly for the week between Christmas and New Year, the corporate calendar is empty. There are no major companies reporting earnings or speaking with investors. Q4 2022 earnings season kicks off on January 13th starting with results from several big banks.
Not much in the way of economic data releases to watch for this week either, although we will get a further little peek into the st-show that is the US housing market right now as we get data concerning Pending Home Sales and the latest House Price Index**.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 20% (24% the previous week)
→Neutral: 28% (31% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 52% (45% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 32 (Bearish by 21 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and/or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) for the second week in a row - up 3.3% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) for the second week in a row, yet again driven in large part by the ongoing price collapse in Tesla - down 3.4% for the week
The S&P 500 was about flat for the week vs NASDAQ-100 down over 2%
International Developed Markets were the week’s winners ahead of US and Emerging Markets
Mid and Small Caps outpaced Large Caps
Value stocks up for the week, Growth stocks down
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 155 and rose by 1 point last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 156 and fell by 7 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is also still below its long term trend line. SPY ended the week 19.8% below its all-time high (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and is still a long way below its long term trend line. QQQ ended the week 32.7% below its all-time high (11/19/2021).
The Lowry’s Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Day Moving Average reading fell from 28% to 27%.This important reading measures the direction and extent of market momentum. Readings remaining consistently below 25% have historically tended to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and those above 75% are often considered to be over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK: A very thought-provoking articlefrom The Atlantic suggesting a complete rethink of how we look at home ownership and how real estate should maybe be treated as consumption (not dissimilar to groceries, vacations and cab rides), rather than as an investment.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
INVERTED YIELD CURVE
An inverted yield curve shows that long-term interest rates are less than short-term interest rates. With an inverted yield curve, the yield decreases the farther away the maturity date is. Sometimes referred to as a negative yield curve, the inverted curve has proven in the past to be a reliable indicator of a recession (although false positives have occurred).
The yield curve graphically represents yields on similar bonds across a variety of maturities. It is also known as the term structure of interest rates. For example, the U.S. Treasury publishes daily Treasury bill and bond yields that can be charted as a curve.
Analysts often distill yield curve signals to a spread between two maturities. This simplifies the task of interpreting a yield curve in which an inversion exists between some maturities but not others. The downside is that there is no general agreement as to which spread serves as the most reliable recession indicator.
The normal yield curve slopes upward from bottom left to top right, reflecting the fact that holders of longer-term debt have taken on more risk. When inverted, it slopes in the opposite fashion (see below).
A yield curve inverts when long-term interest rates drop below short-term rates, indicating that investors are moving money away from short-term bonds and into long-term ones. This suggests that the market as a whole is becoming more pessimistic about the economic prospects for the near future.
Because yield curve inversions are relatively rare yet have often preceded recessions, they typically draw heavy scrutiny from financial market participants.
Academic studies of the relationship between an inverted yield curve and recessions have tended to look at the spread between the yields on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond and the three-month Treasury bill, while market participants have more often focused on the yield spread between the 10-year and two-year bonds.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said in March 2022 that he prefers to gauge recession risk by focusing on the difference between the current three-month Treasury bill rate and the market pricing of derivatives predicting the same rate 18 months later.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The Transition from the primary market driver no longer being the expectations of what Fed interest rate policy will be and instead turning to tangible, evidence-based economic growth and inflation levels officially began last week with stocks trading on the back of growth and inflation perceptions rather than just reacting to Fed rhetoric like obedient lemmings.
That’s something that will likely continue and intensify moving forward into 2023, as investors search for the answers to the two key questions:
1) How fast will inflation decline?
2) How bad will the economy get?
The whole key to stock market performance in the first half of 2023 is starting to shift from whether the Terminal Rate (the prevailing interest rate on the day the Fed ends its policy of interest rate hikes) ends up being 4.9% or 5.1% or whatever, to an assessment of whether the damage to growth and earnings from these higher interest rates, wherever it is they peak, is too much for stocks to bear, or whether they can actually withstand the inevitable economic weakness that is around the corner.
Last week’s news cycle was absolutely pivotal and there’s a lot to get to, so let’s dive right in.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for November came out on Tuesday morning before the market opened. While the year-over-year data is useful for taking a snapshot of where we stand (it was up 7.1% annualized for November), it is less useful when it comes to trying to figure out inflation’s current trajectory as it is so heavily dependent on whatever base level is used from twelve months previously.
What is far more instructive to focus on if you are trying to assess inflation’s present glide path is the month-to-month change and that rose just 0.1% from October to November (below the expected 0.3%) after having risen 0.4% in the September to October timeframe. This was the smallest monthly increase this year. Excluding more volatile food and energy prices, the Core CPI climbed a touch less than expected at 0.2% month-to-month (up 6.0% year-on-year if you must know), down a bit from October’s reading of 0.3%.
The market’s initial reaction to this better-than-expected CPI print was to furiously buy everything, following what had been a pretty impressive gain on Monday as well. However, reality cast its inevitable shadow over proceedings later in the day as it dawned on investors that perhaps a frenzied rise of 1400 Dow points in the space of 24 hours was a slight upside over-reaction to some respectable, but not exactly spectacular, retail inflation data and the bulk of the price gains had been given up by the close.
The next day, Wednesday, was Fed Day and there was no surprise at all when a half a percent increase in interest rates was announced at 2pm ET. Everyone knew that was going to happen. What the market was really focused on was the closely-watched 2023 median dot on the Fed’s quarterly “dot-plot” chart, which shows its own expectation of the Terminal Rate. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in late November that the median dot would be “somewhat” higher than the previous projection in September, which had been 4.6%.
Now we have a better idea of what he meant by “somewhat”. The median dot this time was at 5.1%, considerably higher than that September projection and way higher than June’s, which had been 3.8%. This was viewed as a big deal and disturbed the market, even though everyone kind of suspected that this is where the dot was going to end up (the Wall Street Journal had even said as much the day before). Sometimes, even when you know a piece of bad news is coming, it can still be something of a shock when it is confirmed.
Stock marketsended the day lower as investors digested the dot plot and Powell’s observations in his press conference that current policy is still not sufficiently restrictive and that the likelihood of any rate cuts in 2023 was remote. The market also seemed disappointed that Powell gave no tip of the hat to the previous day’s CPI report showing that inflation appears to be in decline, he chose to pretty much completely ignore that in his comments.
Six other global central banks around the world, including the European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Swiss National Bank, also hiked interest rates in the space of 24 hours. Again, none of this was unexpected, but still weighed on sentiment nonetheless.
In a classic example of the Wall Street adage “buy the rumor, sell the fact”, what had been a steady decline late on Wednesday intensified into something of a bloodbath on Thursday and Friday, wiping out all the intense gains of Monday and Tuesday and then some, partly due to the release of Retail Sales, showing a decline of 0.6% in November, the biggest monthly fall of 2022 and one that confirmed that American consumer budgets are now (finally) under some pressure.
Interestingly, however, it seems that many traders don’t seem to fully believe the Fed’s pronouncements as futures markets still have the Terminal Rate estimate at 4.9% and below 4.5% by the end of 2023, in spite of what the dot plot showed. In further evidence of The Transition, they seem to be looking more closely at the hard data showing cooling inflation rather than listening to the Fed’s threats about what might happen.
The outcome of the next scheduled Fed meeting will be announced on February 1st, 2023 and will be heavily influenced by economic data released in the interim, particularly December CPI which will be released in January.
Going forward, the two biggest threats to stock prices are now either a resumption of higher inflation or economic growth suddenly falling off a cliff or, in the nightmare scenario, both of those at the same time (the dreaded “stagflation” that I talked about in a Weekly Report way back in October 2021).
Stay tuned.
OTHER NEWS
"One of the biggest financial frauds in American history”, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams .. So-called “financial terrorist” and ex-FTX honcho, Sam Bankman-Fried had a rough day last Tuesday, as it became clear that no-one (apart from Kevin O’Leary, it seems) appears to be buying his increasingly desperate attempts to manufacture a phony narrative of himself as a well-meaning nice guy who just got in a bit over his head.
He was finally arrested, denied bail and is now awaiting extradition from the Bahamas to the US on a number of serious civil and criminal charges relating in part to him directing the use of customers’ money to pay the expenses and debts of Alameda Research, his own affiliated hedge fund and whose CEO happened to be his now ex-girlfriend.
The SEC filed civil charges against him, alleging that he"built a house of cards on a foundation of deception" fully intending to defraud both investors and customers. The US government filed eight different criminal charges against him, ranging from securities fraud (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) to wire fraud to illegal campaign contributions to both parties, alleging that his criminal conduct started as early as 2019. The bankruptcy-imposed successor at FTX, John Ray, told Congress that what he discovered upon taking the helm was "plain, old-fashioned embezzlement". SBF faces serious jail time if convicted.
The inconvenience of being arrested torpedoed SBF’s plans to cap his frantic media-round schedule by testifying on a video link to Congress last week. Reuters obtained his prepared statement to the congressional panel and it seems that he he planned to open with the line, "I would like to start by formally stating, under oath: I fucked up". A pathetic, lame attention-seeker right to the bitter end.
Talking of which ..
As Josh Brown told us last week, we need to talk about Tesla (TSLA) .. The stock is down about 60% since the spring (including a fall of over 16% just last week alone) vs. down just 12% for the S&P 500 index of which it is a part. It is almost impossible to get your head around how large the loss of market capitalization is here. Tesla has now lost about $700 billion (!!) in value since April 4th, the day Elon Musk revealed his stake in Twitter and the eventual purchase was funded in no small part by loans using Tesla stock as a form of collateral. Those lenders ain’t happy right now to put it mildly, as their collateral is now worth less than half of what it was when they agreed to make the loans in the first place.
The shocking fact is that the $700 billion in Tesla’s market cap that has been incinerated since April is bigger than the market value of every single publicly traded company in the US, beyond the top five. The stock price crash has also now knocked Musk off his perch as the world’s richest man, pushing him down to second place, according to both Forbes and Bloomberg, behind businessman and art collector, Bernard Arnault.
It would be an understatement to say that a lot of Tesla shareholders are pissed off at Musk’s erratic and distracted behavior over the last few months as he seems to be focusing entirely on managing (as well as initiating) conflict at Twitter, with some now openly calling for him to step away from the car company.
This negative opinion was probably not helped by the fact that we also learned from the Wall Street Journal that he sold $3.5 billion of TSLA stock over the course of just two trading days last week with the price already at two-year lows. This takes him to over $40 billion worth of TSLA stock sales in the last thirteen months, over which time the stock price has fallen from above $407 down to $150.
In related news, self-proclaimed free-speech champion Musk suddenly, and without explanation, shut down the Twitter accounts of a number of journalists from The New York Times, Washington Post and CNN among others, including some who frequently debunk some of the brain-dead online conspiracy theories frequently promoted by Musk and people like him. The “freedom of expression absolutist” also permanently shut down @Elonjet, the account set up by a University of Florida student that used publicly-available data to track the movements of Musk’s private jet.
Also swiftly taken down from Twitter last week were videos showing Elon being heavily booed last Sunday night, when he somehow found the time between jobs to put in an ill-advised and characteristically awkward appearance on stage at a Dave Chappelle show in Silicon Valley - at one point manically yelling at the audience; “I’m rich, b*h!!”. It’s still up on YouTube, though, if you feel the need to cringe.
UNDER THE HOOD:
One of the key elements of technical analysis is that the market discounts all information available. It does that through the actions of investors and traders, who leave their footprints in the data, and by extension, in the indicators that we watch.
The bottom line is that news can create short-term interest in stocks and even set off short-term buy programs. However, in the context of months-long deterioration in market internals and recent improvements in only a handful of indicators, selected news should be treated as noise most of the time as it mostly obscures the continuation of major downtrends in key technical indicators.
Small cap stocks are now noticeably exhibiting worse technical behavior than the market as a whole and this is the opposite of what should be happening in a market that is primed to turn around for the better. Small Cap stocks were the first to fall and lead us into this mess and should be at the forefront of pulling us out.
Signs of a major market bottom, as defined by broadly oversold conditions, total capitulation and the simultaneous combination of exhaustion of Supply and vigorous return of enthusiastic Demand, are still missing. The market has yet to show the classic signs of a sustainable bottom.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Investors will be kept busy by more economic data and a few notable earnings releases before things finally get to slow down for the holiday.
The Consumer Confidence Index, the Personal Income and Expenditures report (both income and spending are expected to rise by 0.4%) and Durable Goods report (expected to decline by 0.7%) all come out this week.
In housing-world, we’ll see the release of the latest Housing Market Index, Residential Construction data and Existing Home Sales.
Nike, FedEx, General Mills, Paychex, Micron and CarMax will all announce quarterly earnings.
Central bank watchers will be awaiting a policy decision by the Bank of Japan on Tuesday, which is expected to leave interest rates unchanged at -0.10%.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 24% (25% the previous week)
→Neutral: 31% (33% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 45% (42% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 21 (Bearish by 17 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - up 2.1% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 4.0% for the week
The NASDAQ-100 underperformed the S&P 500
Once again, US Markets were bottom of the pile with Emerging Markets doing the least badly ahead of International Developed Markets
Small Caps lagged Mid and Large Caps
Growth stocks did worse than Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 154 and rose by 3 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 163 and fell by 2 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, fell back below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but and remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 41. SPY ended the week 19.8% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages. It is still well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 42. QQQ ended the week 32.0% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
What the actions of a top professional tennis player can teach you about assessing your investment strategy.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
SECURITIES FRAUD
Securities fraud, also referred to as stock or investment fraud, is a type of serious white-collar crime that can be committed in a variety of forms but primarily involves misrepresenting information investors use to make decisions.
The perpetrator of the fraud can be an individual, such as a stockbroker. Or, it can be an organization, such as a brokerage firm, corporation, or investment bank. Independent individuals might also commit this type of fraud through schemes such as insider trading.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) describes securities fraud as criminal activity that can include high-yield investment fraud, Ponzi schemes, pyramid schemes, advanced fee schemes, foreign currency fraud, broker embezzlement, hedge-fund-related fraud, and late-day trading. In many cases, the fraudster seeks to dupe investors through misrepresentation and to manipulate financial markets in some way.
This crime includes providing false information, withholding key information, offering bad advice, and offering or acting on inside information.
Securities fraud takes on many forms. In fact, there is no shortage of methods used to trick investors with false information. High-yield investment fraud, for example, may come with guarantees of high rates of return while claiming there is little to no risk. The investments themselves may be in commodities, securities, real estate, and other categories. Advance fee schemes can follow a more subtle strategy, where the fraudster convinces their targets to advance them small amounts of money that are promised to result in greater returns.
Sometimes the money is requested to cover processing fees and taxes for the funds that allegedly await to be disbursed. Ponzi and pyramid schemes typically draw upon the funds furnished by new investors to pay the returns that were promised to prior investors caught up in the arrangement. Such schemes require the fraudsters to continuously recruit more victims to keep the sham going for as long as possible.
One of the newer types of securities fraud is Internet fraud. This type of scheme is also referred to as a pump-and-dump scheme, in which people use chat rooms and forums to spread false or fraudulent information concerning stocks. The intention is to force a price increase in those stocks—the pump, and then when the price reaches a certain level, they sell them off—the dump.
The FBI warns that security fraud is often noted by unsolicited offers and high-pressure sales tactics on the part of the fraudster, along with demands for personal information such as credit card information and Social Security numbers. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the FBI, and other federal and state agencies investigate allegations of securities fraud. The crime can carry both criminal and civil penalties, resulting in imprisonment and/or fines.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Over the past few weeks, the macro environment has generally become “less bad” and that does justify some kind of a rally, but it’s important not to confuse “less bad” conditions with actual “good” ones. It’s also important not to mis-interpret year-end seasonal factors and positioning, combined with a sudden burst of optimism, with the implication that this has sown the seeds for a sustainable rally and an end to all this volatility. We saw in full technicolor (mostly red) last week that it has not. Not yet.
When the day finally arrives when the Fed stops hiking rates, that’ll doubtless be one big negative out of the way. But the question will then become; “just how bad is the economy?” And the answer could well be along the lines of; “pretty damn bad”.
Even if the Fed stops hiking interest rates after the December or February meeting (far from a sure thing), economic growth will likely continue to roll over and corporate earnings will remain under pressure. A stagnant economy and falling earnings do not create a good environment for stocks.
In that scenario, earnings are likely to be depressed until the Fed finally pivots and starts cutting rates again to stimulate the economy in an environment where it feels inflation is at least mostly under control. Mid 2023? End of 2023? 2024? Who knows?
I’m not trying be a complete Debbie Downer here. Some good things are happening and there’s been a tangible improvement in market conditions in recent weeks - but this stuff had been aggressively priced in to stock prices already and we got an acute reminder last week that there are still plenty of major obstacles for risk assets including still-rising interest rates, slowing growth, still-high inflation and falling earnings, not to mention China COVID, the supply chain, Ukraine and the cremation of crypto.
The problem is that there's still enough good news to eventually mean more bad news. The current Catch-22 for stocks is that if the economy is too strong, it means more inflation and more Fed tightening, thereby hurting stock valuations. If the economy is too weak, it can mean lower earnings, thereby hurting stock valuations. Ending up on that narrow piece of middle ground is going to be very tricky.
The skies have most certainly not cleared yet.
Much of last week was spent playing a waiting game before next week’s avalanche of critical data (see THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR, below) and, as has been the case lately, when the market is awaiting something to give it a renewed sense of direction, it tends to just sink steadily lower while it waits.
US equities tumbled early the week as a better-than-expected report on the state of the services sector raised more “good news is bad news” concerns that the strong economy will prompt the Fed to keep increasing interest rates to bring down inflation. Market interest rates jumped, tech stocks got pounded again, bond prices fell and the so-called “fear index”, the VIX (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below) spiked 8% in a day.
There was also a consistent drumbeat of caution from major bank CEOs last week, including those of Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and others at the Goldman Sachs Financial Services Conference, throwing micro-economic fuel onto what had previously been a mostly macro-economic-driven fire.
We learned that the rate of wholesale inflation of raw materials is broadly heading in the right direction, if a little more slowly than the Fed would ideally like. Data released last week showed the Producer Price Index (PPI) rose 0.3% in November, a little higher than expected but no higher than the month before and was up 7.4% from a year ago, easing from 8.1% year-on-year in October. Core PPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also climbed 0.3% and was up 4.9% year-on-year, down from a rate of 5.4% the month before.
The market is very much on edge ahead of next week’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) retail inflation report on Tuesday morning. Any indication that prices remain elevated and that inflation is proving to be more sticky than the recent narrative has led us to believe could be very damaging.
This market narrative, that the Fed seems to have finally broken the back of inflation, had been the dominant one for the last few weeks but doubts certainly began to creep in last week and if this is just the latest example of an Emperor with no clothes like all the other false starts of 2022, things could get ugly.
The very next day comes the announcement of the Fed’s final interest rate hike of 2022, with a half a percent increase all but certain, but with the tone and nuance of Chair Jay Powell’s ensuing news conference likely to prove critical to the market’s reaction. And then the day after that, we will hear from the European Central Bank (ECB) on what they are doing with interest rates over there.
Strap in, this could be a frenzied week one way or the other.
As I constantly have to do every few weeks, I do want to emphasize that for investors with significant time horizons (15/20 years +), we are experiencing what could be a once every 10-20 years buying opportunity, regardless of any gloomy stuff you may be hearing or reading (including in this very weekly review sometimes) regarding the medium term outlook for stocks.
As I have said before, real-time market declines are always painful and possible future declines always seem scary to contemplate. But past declines never fail to look like (often missed) golden buying opportunities. And what we are going through right now will one day be a past decline. We don’t know exactly when this will be, but we do know that many people will one day look back on now and wish that they had taken greater advantage of the prevailing circumstances.
OTHER NEWS
Recession right now? I don’t think so .. I referred to “recession truthers” in last week’s report who are absolutely desperate to tell us how we are already experiencing a recession as we speak and it was another bad week for their highly flawed case. In the context of an economy that’s adding a quarter of a million jobs or more every month, we learned that over a third of the jobs which have been lost this year have been in the tech and media/communication services sectors which only employ about 3-4% of the national workforce (but which get all the self-pitying air-time in the media).
The American consumer is still spending like crazy, as evidenced by monster Black Friday spending data and we will learn more about this when the monthly retail sales number comes out this week.
None of this is remotely close to recessionary and nor is the fact that one of the most reliable signs of the arrival of an actual recession, the credit card 30-day delinquency rate, remains at barely above 2%. It’s at its lowest levels since 50 Cent was spending his time in da club in 2003 and got to close to 7% during the last proper recession in 2008.
All of which is not to say that we can’t move into a recession in 2023 or 2024 as all this data could well deteriorate quickly, just that we are not there yet.
China’s Zero-COVID policy over? .. China is lifting its most severe COVID restriction policies following an outbreak of protests against the strict controls. Lockdowns would continue but should now only apply to more targeted areas - for example, certain buildings, units or floors as opposed to whole neighborhoods or cities being shut down. Areas identified as high-risk could come out of lockdown after five days if no new cases are found. Several cities in China have endured months-long lockdowns even with only a handful of cases having been found.
People with COVID can now isolate at home rather than in state facilities if they have mild or no symptoms. They also no longer need to show tests for most venues and can travel more freely inside the country. Schools can remain open with student attendance if there's no wider campus outbreak.
The general sense is that this is all considered likely to help propel a rebound in the Chinese economy and could also help to ease pressure on global supply chains. But the Chinese battle with the virus may be only just beginning.
The Zero COVID policy has hindered and delayed the country’s fight against community infection up till now. Vaccines and boosters are of inferior quality to those in the West and fewer than half of over-eighties have been boosted with them anyhow. 1.4 billion Chinese have next to no natural immunity and, worryingly, there are only 3.6 ICU beds per 100,000 people in China, compared to the US’s 34.7.
Another bad week for Zuck .. European Union (EU) privacy regulators have ruled that Meta/Facebook (META) cannot require users to agree to personalized ads based on their online activity, a ruling that could hit the company hard, limiting the data that Meta/Facebook can access to sell such ads to third parties. The ruling on Monday approved a series of decisions which determined that EU privacy law prohibits the company’s practice and that of its platforms, such as Instagram and Facebook, of using their terms of service as a justification for allowing such advertising.
Meta/Facebook was also forced last week into threatening to remove news from its platforms if the US Congress passes a proposal aimed at making it easier for news organizations to negotiate collectively with individual companies like Google and Facebook. Lawmakers are considering adding the proposal to the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act as a way to help the struggling local news industry.
Many recently-fired Meta/Facebook employees (the company shed 11,000 jobs last month) are claiming that they are only being paid a part of their promised severance payments and that the company is ghosting them when they attempt to reach out for an explanation.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Lowry’s Selling Pressure crossed back into the dominant position above the Buying Power on Monday as the momentum of Demand is clearly waning and buyers look exhausted. This is in stark contrast to the exhaustion of sellers, which is generally a necessary prerequisite for a sustainable turnaround in the market’s fortunes and, frankly, seems like a bit of a distant hope at the moment as the latest bear market rally appears to now be running on fumes.
Medium to longer term technical indicators never really got out of second gear during the latest rally, staying stubbornly supportive of the bear case. But now even the shorter term readings, which had turned hopefully positive for a while, have fallen back in line and all time frames are now confirming a negative technical outlook.
It is interesting to note, however, that we are now experiencing a very similar technical set-up to that of exactly four years ago, in early December 2018, which investors may remember led to the start of what was a final sharp, brutal move lower in the major price indexes going into the Christmas holiday, which finally completely exhausted Supply before strong Demand then crashed the bears’ party to turn things around dramatically in the very last days of the year and into early 2019.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
It will be a decisive week for investors, with the release of the November US inflation data, interest rate decisions on both sides of the Atlantic and the latest US retail sales number, all of which could well determine how stocks perform for at least the rest of the year.
Pre-market on Tuesday morning, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics will report the November Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation. The headline index is expected to be up by 7.3% year-on-year, compared with a 7.7% rate in October. The Core rate, which excludes food and energy components, is forecast to be up 6.1%, versus 6.3% last month.
Then on Wednesday afternoon, the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee (FOMC) will conclude its two-day meeting with an announcement of the latest interest rate adjustment, forward guidance (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK, below) and a press conference from Chair Jerome Powell. The whole jamboree will begin around 2pm ET (directly clashing with the kick-off time for the second World Cup semi final, ugh!). The strong expectation is for a further increase of 0.50% in the Fed Funds interest rate to a target range of 4.25% to 4.50%, following four-straight 0.75% hikes at the most recent meetings.
Other economic data out next week includes the important Retail Sales data announcement for November on Thursday.
Across the water, the European Central Bank will announce its latest monetary policy decision as well and is also expected to raise interest rates by half a percent.
A relatively light earnings docket this week includes announcements from Oracle, Adobe, Accenture, Lennar and Darden Restaurants.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 25% (unchanged from 25% the previous week)
→Neutral: 33% (down from 35% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 42% (up from 40% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 17 (Bearish by 15 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Duke Energy) - down 0.75% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) for the second week in a row - down 8.4% for the week
The S&P 500 and the NASDAQ-100 performed pretty much equally poorly
US Markets were bottom of the pile with Emerging Markets doing the least badly ahead of International Developed Markets
Small Caps underperformed Mid Caps, with Large Caps doing least badly
Growth stocks were beaten up much worse than Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 151 and fell by by 13 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 165 and rose by 9 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains just above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but has now fallen back below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 50. SPY ended the week 17.7% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, fell back below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages. It remains well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 49. QQQ ended the week 30.1% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK: It’s the question everyone is asking; How TF is FTX founder and fraudster Sam Bankman-Fried not in jail yet? Slate dives into it.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
FORWARD GUIDANCE
Forward guidance refers to the communication from a central bank about the state of the economy and the likely future course of monetary policy. It is the verbal assurance from a country's central bank to the public about its intended monetary policy.
Forward guidance attempts to influence the financial decisions of households, businesses, and investors by providing a guidepost for the expected path of interest rates. The central bank's clear messages to the public are one tool for preventing surprises that might disrupt the markets and cause significant fluctuations in asset prices.
Forward guidance is a key tool of the Federal Reserve (Fed) in the United States.1 Other central banks, such as the Bank of England (BOE), the European Central Bank (ECB), and the Bank of Japan (BOJ), use it as well.
Forward guidance consists of telling the public not only what the central bank intends to do but what conditions will cause it to stay the course and what conditions will cause it to change its approach.
For example, in early 2014, the Fed's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) said it would continue to keep the federal funds rate at the lower bound at least until the unemployment rate fell to 6.5% and inflation increased to 2% annually. It also said that reaching these conditions would not automatically lead to an adjustment in Fed policy.
With some sense of where the economy might be headed, individuals, businesses, and investors can have greater confidence in their spending and investing decisions. Also, forward guidance can help the financial markets function more smoothly. For example, if the FOMC indicates it expects to raise the federal funds rate in six months, potential home buyers might want to get mortgages ahead of a potential increase in mortgage rates.
During the FOMC meeting on March 15-16, 2022, the Fed increased interest rates in an effort to combat rising inflation. The Fed's target range was increased by 0.25% for the first time since 2018, going from 0% to 0.25% to 0.25% to 0.50%.
In the US, the Fed's FOMC has used forward guidance as one of its major tools since the Great Recession.
Through the use of forward guidance, the FOMC has communicated its intent to keep interest rates low for as long as needed to improve credit availability and stimulate the economy. Similarly, Fed Chair Jerome Powell communicated to the financial markets that the Fed would continue to support the U.S. economy until the effects of the global financial crisis have subsided.
Almost all recent Fed chairs, including Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen and now Jerome Powell have been strong proponents of forward guidance. However, before the long tenure of Alan Greenspan, the Fed was far more reticent about telegraphing its intentions into the market.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Watching a grandfatherly, white-haired 69 year old man doing performative dance doesn’t sound like something hot-shot Wall Street traders and stock market professionals would choose to spend their time doing, but they very much are and that somewhat elderly gentleman is by far the the most important influence right now on the immediate trajectory of your net worth.
We are talking, of course, about Jerome Powell, the current Chair of the Federal Reserve, which needs financial conditions to remain tight to ensure its rate increases filter through the economy as desired: slowing demand and helping bring down inflation.
As we begin to look towards 2023, the focus of the markets will eventually turn towards the economy and earnings. But before that can occur, the Fed must finish its rate hike campaign. So for now by far the single biggest influence on stocks remains the Fed and the state of its impending rate hike crusade.
In fact, the Fed has been responsible for virtually every significant market pullback in 2022, and each time (January, May, June, August, September, October) it’s been because the Fed has signaled that interest rates will in fact rise more than the more upbeat financial markets had expected at the time. Consequently, the looming final Fed interest rate decision of the year on December 14th will likely be the single event that determines if we get a “Santa Claus Rally” (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) in stocks, or another 10%+ pullback that pushes prices back towards the 2022 lows.
To understand the economic and market environment likely to prevail next year, you have to understand how Powell is trying to take the lead in a dance with financial markets and how, frequently, these markets don't cooperate.
Stock and bond markets are primed to see a policy pivot back toward the lowering of rates again and cheaper money around every corner and will seize on any nugget that fits this narrative.
That creates a dynamic in which every time Powell tries to add any kind of nuance to his messaging, indicating perhaps that the Fed doesn't intend to overdo things and cause more economic pain than necessary, stock and bond markets immediately rip irrationally higher in response. Did you see that?! The pivot! The pivot! The pivot is coming! Powell just said so!
In response, Fed policymakers are forced to take to stages and airwaves all over the country and give a round of speeches in which they try to dampen down the markets’ giddy exuberance.
And it is in the context of this dance that we should look at what Powell said in a speech last Wednesday; “It makes sense to moderate the pace of our rate increases as we approach the level of restraint that will be sufficient to bring inflation down. The time for moderating the pace of rate increases may come as soon as the December meeting." He said absolutely nothing new, nothing that the market did not already know. Yet stocks rallied hard on the market’s chosen interpretation of his speech - seemingly overlooking the fact that, moments later, he also said; “It is likely that restoring price stability will require holding policy at a restrictive level for some time.”
St. Louis Fed president James Bullard then dutifully came out with a large bucket of ice-cold water, saying that the markets are “underpricing the risk” of a possibly more-aggressive-than-expected Fed and even put the specter of a terminal interest rate (the rate at which the Fed stops raising rates) of up to 7% on the table. It is currently forecasted to be about 5%.
All this was against the backdrop of continued COVID protests in China, the aversion of a national rail strike, red-hot Black Friday spending data, the contraction of US manufacturing for the first time after 29 straight months of growth and a benign inflation reading from the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index report - all ahead of Friday’s key jobs report.
Recession truthers suffered another setback when the report came out and showed that the jobs market remains on fire. Yet another 263k jobs were added in November, way more than expected. The jobless rate remains unchanged at 3.7%.
In true “good news is bad news”-style, markets initially reacted by plummeting, fearing that their holy grail of a pivot to the lowering of rates could well be postponed by this perfect excuse for the Fed to keep up (or even intensify) its campaign of raising rates as a result of the labor market remaining so hot. A late day recovery, however, left the indexes mostly in the green for the week.
OTHER NEWS
Crypto woes, this week’s installment ..Yet another important corner of the cryptocurrency universe crumbled into non-existence in the wake of the catastrophic FTX collapse. BlockFi, backed by venture capitalist Peter Thiel (whose recent banking venture GloriFi just went out of business after only three months in existence), filed for bankruptcy on Monday.
Interestingly, Blockfi’s fourth largest creditor is actually the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) which is still owed a good amount of the $100m fine it imposed on the company earlier this year for regulatory filing failures and illegal sales practices. Blockfi until recently offered enticingly high yields on over $10 billion of cryptocurrency deposits to the community of crypto bros, many of whom loudly mocked the rest of us for not indulging in the practice.
According to a report published in the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, it increasingly looks like the next shoe to drop in the utter st-show that is crypto right now might be Tether Holdings** which seems to have increasingly been lending its own coins to customers rather than selling them for hard currency upfront meaning the company may not have enough liquid assets to pay redemptions. This is starting to sound awfully familiar.
Indeed BlackRock CEO, Larry Fink, came right out at the New York Times DealBook Summit last week and said; “I actually believe most of the [crypto] companies are not going to be around.”
2022 word of the year .. The US dictionary publisher Merriam Webster announced on Monday that their 2022 word of the year is "gaslighting" or as Merriam-Webster defines it, "the act or practice of grossly misleading someone especially for one's own advantage." Interest in the term was up by 1,740% over the previous years according to searches of the online dictionary.
But its popularity among those looking up words in the online dictionary is also likely down to its somewhat complicated and sometimes vague meaning. The top definition of "gaslighting" from Merriam-Webster (inspired by the 1944 movie “Gaslight” starring Ingrid Bergman) is a form of psychological manipulation, usually over an extended period of time, that "causes the victim to question the validity of their own thoughts, perception of reality, or memories and typically leads to confusion, loss of confidence and self-esteem, uncertainty of one's emotional or mental stability, and a dependency on the perpetrator."
UNDER THE HOOD:
Wednesday afternoon’s big rally in stock prices following Powell’s comments lifted the Dow Jones Industrial Average to more than 20% up from its recent low, technically placing it back into a bull market. The S&P 500 also spiked above its long term trend line for the first time since April. However, caution is advised against reading too much into these “new bull market” clickbait headlines that you may have seen last week as a result of these relatively meaningless technical thresholds.
There continues to be a short-term divergence between the Buying Power / Selling Pressure dynamic (mostly negative in nature) and the behavior of the major price indexes (recently positive in nature) as buyers increasingly seem to be heading towards exhaustion.
Many technical readings are closely aligned with where they were at the time of a number of downward market reversals in the last year. For instance, just last August, a popular indicator was making the rounds that said since 1946, through 13 bear markets, every time the S&P 500 gained back 50% of its losses (which it had just done at the time), the bear market ended then and there. Unfortunately, 2022 did not get the memo and new lows were soon reached again.
There are similarities between the technical outlook then and now. The indexes which drove the recent rally are showing signs of running out of steam and while the sometimes quirky low-volume market conditions between Thanksgiving and New Year could be partly to blame, this is a concern for the bulls.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Next week is relatively quiet on the earnings and economic data front, but there are still several notable earnings releases still coming including GameStop, Costco, LuluLemon, AutoZone, Campbell’s Soup, Broadcom and Chewy with General Electric and Lowe’s hosting investor days.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics will release the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation for November. Expectations are for a rise of 7.2% from a year earlier for the headline index and 5.9% for the core index, which excludes food and energy prices.
Economic data out next week includes the Purchasing Managers’ Sentiment Index for November on Monday. It's expected to decline to 53, which would be the index's most negative reading since May 2020 and the University of Michigan releases its Consumer Sentiment Index, which is expected to tick up a little from the previous month.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 25% (down from 29% the previous week)
→Neutral: 35% (up from 31% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 40% (unchanged from 40% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 15 (Bearish by 11 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook) - up 3.5%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - down 1.8%
The NASDAQ-100 did better than the S&P 500
Emerging Markets significantly outperformed International Developed Markets and US Markets
Large and Small Caps both outperformed Mid Caps
Growth stocks beat out Value stocks
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 164 and rose by by 2 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 156 and fell by 4 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and and last week moved above its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 63. SPY ended the week 14.8% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages. It is however still quite a way below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 59. QQQ ended the week 27.4% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK: “Mom and Dad, how much money have you got?” Why it’s a great idea to talk to your parents about their money.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
SANTA CLAUS RALLY
A Santa Claus Rally describes a sustained increase in the stock market that occurs in the week leading up to December 25th. However, there seems to be some disagreement over whether these rallies happen in the week leading up to Christmas, or if it's the week after Christmas until January 2nd.
Looking at past price history, the week after Christmas is notoriously quiet and prices tend to move sideways in very narrow ranges. This makes sense if you think about it, as many market participants will take care of year-end position adjustments in the week before Christmas, while there is still plenty of liquidity. Further, this lull is most likely due to market participants taking the holiday break between Christmas and New Year's Day. As such, for the purposes of this article, we will assign the week leading up to December 25th as having the potential for a Santa Claus rally.
There are numerous explanations for the causes of a Santa Claus rally, including tax considerations, a general feeling of optimism and seasonal happiness on Wall Street, and the investing of holiday bonuses. Another theory, as mentioned, is that some very large institutional investors, many of which are more sophisticated and pessimistic than retail investors, tend to go on vacation at this time, leaving the market to retail investors, who tend to be more bullish, or positive, toward the market.
To see if there is any validity to the proposition of a regularly occurring Santa Claus effect, we looked back at the last 20 years of performance of the Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) in the week leading up to December 25th. Based on our review of the data, we can state that there is minimal evidence of any discernible Santa Claus rally. The average return over the time period was +0.385%, or effectively flat.
Of the 20 weeks we analyzed, there were 13 weeks with a positive return, five with a negative return and two weeks with no change. The range spanned +5.4% in 2021 to -10.7% in 2018. Of the winning days, the average win was +1.58%, while the average losing day was -3.28 %. We think the numbers bear out the conclusion that there is no reliably meaningful Santa Claus rally.
Given such a small historical return, and a marginally positive frequency of occurrences, traders should be extremely cautious about buying or selling based on the supposed Santa Claus rally. While Santa Claus can be counted on to deliver the presents on Christmas, the stock market cannot be relied upon to always deliver gifts. That said, any positive gain in the stock market around Christmas is virtually guaranteed to lead financial market observers to refer to the Santa Claus rally.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any kind of investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
It was a quiet week, so let’s take the opportunity to zoom out a bit, look at the bigger picture and see where we stand in the ongoing saga of this bear market ..
There wasn’t too much to take from a choppy, vacation-shortened week with increasingly thin attendance and extremely low volume (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK as well as UNDER THE HOOD below) ahead of and right after the Thanksgiving holiday.
We got the minutes from the last Fed meeting earlier this month which raised interest rates by 0.75% and they clearly showed that a substantial majority of those present judged that a slowing in the pace of rate increases “would likely soon be appropriate” and it was noted that some participants expressed concerns about the potential negative impacts on the financial system if the Fed continued to pursue its aggressive rate-hiking policy at the current high-octane pace.
This appeared to confirm the momentum that seems to be building among investors that the Fed will indeed slow the pace of tightening as soon as at its next meeting in early December and is now not far from its terminal rate (the Fed Funds rate on the day that they announce the end to interest rate increases).
We also saw some strong quarterly earnings reports from retailers. Best Buy (BBY) posted solid Q3 results and raised its 2022 final sales projection. Dick’s Sporting Goods (DKS), Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF) and American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) also gave upbeat outlooks.
What the market needs to see is slowing but not collapsing economic growth and a tangible downward shift in inflation and that is a nice segue to a quick review of our ongoing Three Keys To A Market Bottom.
Key #1: Inflation clearly peaks and then declines and the Fed openly pulls back from its current hawkish stance. This is by far the most important key of all when it comes to finding a bottom to this bear market. If inflation can get back down into the 3%-5% area, that will probably make the Fed back off the hawkish rhetoric, likely resulting in a sustainable bottom in stocks. Based on the most recent data, inflation does now appear to have peaked in the US and that obviously needed to happen before we can hope for progress on the remaining two fronts (meaningfully declining inflation and peak Fed hawkishness) although neither of those appear that imminent. Where are we now? A step in the right direction, but a lot further to go.
Key #2: Chinese lockdowns ease and growth resumes. Over the past few weeks Chinese officials have signaled there will be substantive changes to COVID policies, including more targeted lockdowns that don’t paralyze entire cities, shorter quarantine times for international travelers and the importation of proper COVID vaccines, among others. While we are not expecting to hear an explicit declaration that China will abandon its Zero-COVID policy, a process of moving away from that policy has clearly begun. It will, however, take a good amount of time for the Chinese economy to return to a pre-COVID normal. Where are we now? Notwithstanding some reported outbreaks and sporadic lockdowns last week, movement towards this goal is definitely under way.
Key #3: Geopolitical tensions decline. Positively, global commodity prices have fallen - but these declines haven’t been the result of reduced geopolitical tensions. Instead, it’s been the result of the commodities markets pricing in the rising chances of a global recession. Regarding geopolitics, we have seen some progress over the past month, in spite of the Poland rocket story. “Diplomatic chatter” about working to find a ceasefire has definitively increased over the past weeks, with Russian, Ukrainian and US officials all making guardedly positive comments about potential talks, which is noticeable improvement over the situation a while back, when there appeared to be no chance that would materialize. Where are we now? More hopeful than for a very long time, although it should be emphasized that nothing has actually happened yet.
The overall macro takeaway from these Three Keys is net positive in terms of the direction in which things are going but less so, perhaps, when it comes to the pace of progress. There’s still an awful lot of work to do, but the last time we took a hard look at these keys in late summer/early fall, the outlook was far more dismal on all fronts.
There’s still an ongoing drumbeat of other factors in the background, of course. Not least the ongoing and increasingly jaw-dropping story of the collapse of the FTX crypto exchange.
Last week we learned from FTX’s own lawyer that a “substantial amount” of the company’s assets is “missing”, very possibly stolen. He said that FTX had been under the control of “inexperienced and unsophisticated individuals, some or all of whom were compromised individuals” - clearly pointing the finger squarely at Sam Bankman-Fried, the former man-crush of crypto bros everywhere, now cowering in his luxury apartment in the Bahamas awaiting the inevitable and long overdue knock on the door from the authorities. The trademark scruffy t-shirts and ripped jeans could well be replaced soon by an orange jump suit.
Venture capital firm Sequoia Capital came out and apologized to investors for its $150 million loss on FTX and vowed to “improve its due diligence” before making such risky investments in the future. Now there’s a revolutionary idea!
As the terrific Jason Zweig of the Wall Street Journal put it;
“In good times, when markets are booming, taking stupid risks doesn't stop you from getting rich quick; if anything, it can even help. But if you want to get rich slowly and stay rich reliably, you have to learn to avoid taking stupid risks.
That's what down markets are for. They don't just separate people from their money. They also separate people into those who learn from mistakes and those who don't.”
OTHER NEWS
US retirement balances lower .. A study from Fidelity found the average 401(k) balance fell to $97,200 in Q3, down 6% from the prior quarter and 23% lower than a year ago. The average 403b balance was 6% lower than it was at the end of June and 21% lower year-over-year. The average IRA balance was $101,900, an 8% drop from Q2 and a 25% decline from 2021.
Now investors are pulling out of the housing market as well.. Investor buying of homes crashed by 30% in Q3, a sign that the toxic combination of the rise in interest rates and high home prices that pushed traditional buyers to the sidelines are causing these investment firms to pull back, too. Companies bought around 66k homes in 40 tracked markets during Q3, compared with 94k homes during the same quarter a year ago. This is the largest quarterly decline in investor purchases since the sub-prime crisis of 2007/2008, other the freak second quarter of 2020 when the pandemic shut down most home buying.
Just a few months ago, these firms were buying homes in record numbers, helping to supercharge the housing market. Now, investors are reducing their buying activity in line with the decline in overall home sales.
Recession in earnings? Not so much .. Company executives may be talking about recession risks a lot these days. But if you look at what they're actually doing, things look a little different. The nation's biggest firms reported record capital expenditure (investments in buildings, new machinery or technology).
But company borrowing has slowed on the back of higher interest rates, which suggests that while companies continue to invest at a brisk pace, they might not be borrowing as much to do so. Rather, they are relying on booming profits built up in recent years.
So while whether or not the economy will fall into recession at some point may remain up for debate, there is clearly no recession right now in company earnings. Cash flow levels are very healthy.
UNDER THE HOOD:
We are now witnessing a significant divergence between the macro-economic and conventional messaging (see above) and the under the hood market technicals. Usually these may differ in degree, but generally they will point in approximately the same direction. Not so right now since, while the end to the pain at least appears in sight when viewed through the the macro lens as described above, the technicals are rather unambiguous; the downtrend remains very much undisturbed.
The S&P 500 did finally break above near-term resistance at 4,007 on Wednesday leaving the short term path of least resistance higher as we closed out the shortened holiday trading week. However, we are starting to move into short term overbought territory. Additionally, trading volume was minimal, indeed Friday was the lowest trading volume day since December 26th, 2019, so we should probably not really read too much into what happens in this kind of environment.
The current rally is now about four weeks old and responsible for about a 13% rise in the S&P 500. This is similar in both duration and effect to the June/July one. When you side-by-side these these two comparable rallies from a technical standpoint in terms of Buying Power vs Selling Pressure and market breadth and intensity, the current advance is very much only the silver medallist.
It’s probably worth at least bearing in mind that the technically superior rally in the summer fizzled out completely and we were at new lows again within a couple of months.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Well-rested from a holiday-shortened week filled with turkey and stuffing, investors will get a new portion of earnings reports and economic indicators to digest this week.
Salesforce, Intuit, United Health, Crowdstrike, Hewlett Packard, Intuit, Kroger, Dollar General, Synopsis, Marvell Technology and Ulta Beauty report Q3 results this week.
The National Home Prices Index for September will come out on Tuesday and is expected to show a continued meaningful slowdown in the rate of increase in home prices.
This week, we will also see the latest Consumer Confidence Index and Personal Income and Expenditure data.
The biggest releases, however will be on the jobs front. First of all the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) on Wednesday and then the latest Jobs Report on Friday, which is expected to show another 220k jobs were created in November and an unchanged unemployment rate of 3.7%.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 29% (down from 34% the previous week)
→Neutral: 31% (up from 26% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 40% (unchanged from 40% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 11 (Bearish by 8 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the Great Financial Crisis. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987.
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Duke Energy) - up 3.6%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - up 1.0%
The S&P 500 again outperformed the NASDAQ-100
International Developed Markets outperformed US Markets with Emerging Markets bringing up the rear
Mid Caps were last week’s winners, beating out Large Caps with Small Caps coming in last
Value stocks beat out Growth stocks
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 162 and rose by by 2 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 160 and fell by 12 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and but still a little below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 62. SPY ended the week 15.8% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is now above its 50-day moving average and sitting just a touch above its 90-day. It is still well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 57. QQQ ended the week 28.9% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK: The enormous under-performance (not to mention excessive fees) of actively managed funds that use a human decision-making process (i.e. a fund manager and a bunch of analysts) should hopefully be common knowledge to everyone by now.
But in case there are any olden-timey people out there who still think that hiring a stock-picking human fund manager adds anything but pain to your portfolio over the long term, this underperformance has been irrefutably proven by 20 years of data.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
TRADING VOLUME
Trading volume is the total number of shares of a security that were traded during a given period of time. Trading volume is a technical indicator because it represents the overall activity of a security or a market. Investors often use trading volume to confirm the existence or continuation of a trend, or a trend reversal. Essentially, trading volume can legitimize a security's price action, which can then aid an investor in their decision to either buy or sell that security.
Trading volume can help an investor identify momentum in a security like a market exchange traded fund (ETF) and confirm a trend. If trading volume increases, prices generally move in the same direction. That is, if a security is continuing higher in an uptrend, the volume of the security should also increase and vice versa.
For example, suppose ABC stock/ETF increased in price by 10% over the past month. An investor is interested and wants to purchase 1,000 shares. However, the investor is not confident the price will continue in this uptrend and is worried that the trend may reverse.
In this example, trading volume analysis can be very useful. The investor sees that there was a steady increase in ABC's trading volume over the past month. They also notice that the trading volume was the highest that ABC had experienced over the past two years, and that the price is continuing to trend higher. This signals to the investor that ABC is gaining momentum and gives them more confidence that the trend may continue higher.
Trading volume can also signal when an investor should take profits and sell a security due to low activity. If there is no relationship between the trading volume and the price of a security, this signals weakness in the current trend and a possible reversal.
For example, suppose ABC extended its uptrend for another five months and increased by 70% in six months. The investor sees that share price of ABC is still in an uptrend and continues to hold on to the shares. However, the trading volume is decreasing. This could signal to the investor that the bullish uptrend in ABC is beginning to lose momentum and may soon end.
The following week, the share price of ABC decreases by 10% in one trading session after being in an uptrend for six months. This results in the stock breaking its upward trend. More significantly, the trading volume spikes higher when compared to its average daily trading volume (ADTV). The investor might sell out of all the shares of ABC the next day because the combination of a sharp drop in price and spike in trading volume confirmed that the uptrend might be coming to an end and a reversal might be in the offing.
“Good trading volume” for a security is hard to define because trading volume's value comes into play when looked at in context with other indicators, such as price direction and volatility. Any level of volume that provides investors with specific insight into a security's price action (and a sense of the trading interest in that security) can be thought of as a good trading volume.
“High trading volume” (relative to past measures of that volume) that accompanies rising prices or an upward trend can signal strong interest in a security by buyers. On the other hand, high trading volume that accompanies dropping prices or a downward trend can signal worry on the part of investors. This can result in more selling and even lower prices. High trading volume could also reflect some isolated news or event related to the company associated with the stock.
Low volume, is it a good or bad thing? It depends. Trading volume is defined as the number of shares traded in a particular period of time. So, low trading volume can indicate a lack of interest in either buying or selling. That means it could be bullish if low volume occurs in a downtrend. It could be bearish if it's noted in an uptrend.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Apologies once again for last week’s report, or the lack of it. I am safely back in the US now and very much recovered. Thanks for all the good wishes that I received, they are very much appreciated.
Towering over last week’s market activity was the extraordinary and shocking fraudulent collapse of the FTX crypto exchange. For many, this was a watershed moment where the whole crypto eco-system was finally exposed as being polluted by criminality and fraud and is sorely in need of subjecting itself to very meaningful regulation very soon if it is to have any hope of remaining viable.
The rampant lawlessness in the current version of crypto-world will only make regulated government-sponsored programs like the Digital Dollar Pilot (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK, below) either more attractive or less attractive, depending on how you look at it. Either you think that crypto cannot continue to exist in the hands of a few often criminally-inclined unrepentant crypto bros like Do Kwon, Sam Bankman-Fried and the rest and needs to be under government control or you think the whole thing is such a s**t-show that the government shouldn’t even be touching it with a ten-foot pole.
The FTX bankruptcy overseer, John Ray, said “never in my [40 year] career have I seen such a complete failure of corporate controls and such a complete absence of trustworthy financial information as occurred here.” And this is a guy who oversaw the bankruptcy of Enron!
Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Neel Kashkari did not mince his words last week, calling out all cryptocurrencies as nonsense. He tweeted that the fall of FTX wasn’t just a case of one fraudulent player in a serious industry, but that the “entire notion of crypto is nonsense.” He added that crypto is not useful for payments, doesn’t provide an inflation hedge, has no scarcity value and no taxing authority. He described it as “just a tool of speculation and greater fools [a reference to the Greater Fool Theory]”
On the other hand, investors continue to see less and less risk in buying stocks. They want inflation to go down, so stocks can go up. But every time stocks go up, the Federal Reserve fears that inflation won't go down and Fed officials went out of their way last week to frantically emphasize that stock markets, giddy after the previous week’s furious rally, could be getting ahead of themselves.
San Francisco Fed Bank President Mary Daly said any discussion about pausing interest rate hikes “is off the table” although she did then go on to say that a range of 4.75% to 5.25% is a reasonable expectation for peak interest rates, implying the current cycle is close to done.
St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard said interest rates "will need to be increased further" to become "sufficiently restrictive" in taming inflation.
Boston Federal Reserve President Susan Collins said on CNBC that yet another 0.75% interest rate hike in December was "still on the table" .
“It will probably be appropriate soon to move to a slower pace of increases,” Federal Reserve Vice Chair Lael Brainard told Bloomberg. “But I think what’s really important to emphasize: We’ve done a lot, but we have additional work to do.”
That's not exactly pivot-friendly language and reminds us that October’s inflation report was not a game changer, it was only a hopeful first step in the right direction.
On Tuesday, with the markets already jittery following reports that a Russian rocket had struck a Polish village, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its measure of wholesale inflation, the Producer Price Index (PPI) for October, showing that raw material prices rose 0.2%, at the same pace as in September. The index was up 8.0% from a year ago, down from a rate of 8.4% the month before.
Retail sales jumped in October, up 1.3% after being unchanged the month before. That was the biggest advance since February. The annual gain was 8.3%. All these numbers exceeded forecasts, raising concerns of yet another green light to the Fed to keep up its aggressive monetary tightening to fight inflation.
Also unhelpful to market sentiment was the announcement that Target (TGT)‘s Q3 profits had plunged 50% and that the retailer was very concerned about sales during the key upcoming holiday season. The company blamed this on changes in consumer behavior, indicating that shoppers are increasingly being impacted by inflation, rising interest rates, and economic uncertainty.
Housing saw an eleventh straight monthly decline in builder sentiment and the ninth straight monthly fall in existing home sales as the real estate sector continues to reel from the Federal Reserve's aggressive rate hikes. Average rates on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage have jumped from about 3% in January to over 7% currently.
So messages remain mixed, generally indicating a slowing economy but with consumers continuing to spend eagerly, only a light leveling-off in the rates of inflation and employment availability and the Fed still talking tough on interest rates. It’s difficult to see a sustainable turnaround from bear to bull while these contradictions continue to exist.
OTHER NEWS
Home prices rolling over? ..U.S. home prices could plunge as much as 20% due to a sharp rise in mortgage rates this year. Higher rates are dramatically increasing home ownership costs and “boost the odds of a severe house price correction,” according to a report from the Dallas Federal Reserve.
Dallas Fed economist Enrique Martinez-Garcia did admit that the potential for the nation’s homes to shed as much of a fifth of their value represents a “pessimistic scenario” but home prices could easily drop 15-20% under his scenario, driving down personal consumption by about 0.7%. “Such a negative wealth effect on aggregate demand would further restrain housing demand, deepening the [home] price correction and setting in motion a negative feedback loop,” Martinez-Garcia said in a release.
“Well, this is awkward …” ..In an abrupt about-face that all but blindsided official soccer World Cup sponsor Anheuser-Busch InBev, Qatari officials suddenly reversed course on agreed policy on Friday and banned beer sales in and around the Islamic country’s eight World Cup venues just two days before the world’s biggest sporting event kicks off.
Tournament organizer FIFA once again caved in to Qatari pressure, continuing the pattern of fawning incompetence, greed and corruption that goes back to when the tiny Gulf state (it’s smaller than Connecticut) was disastrously and fraudulently awarded the tournament in 2010 (I strongly recommend watching this documentary) as a nation with zero soccer heritage with brutal legislation that oppresses women and minorities, imported slave labor to build all the stadiums (with reported deaths of migrant workers involved with the project numbering over 6,500) and has a broad ban on alcohol consumption.
Anheuser-Busch are said to be furious at what they see as FIFA’s pathetic weakness, immediately tweeting “Well, this is awkward …” (later deleted). The company has handed over $75 million to FIFA to be a primary partner and exclusive beer distributor for World Cup 2022, along with the likes of other partners like Visa, Coca-Cola and McDonalds.
FIFA expects to generate about $6.5 billion from the tournament. You can be sure lawyers are being earnestly lined up on both sides as we speak.
On the brink? .. Twitter is teetering on the edge as Elon Musk appears to be breaking the company after buying it for $44 billion last month. The self-styled “champion of free speech for all” has pushed relentlessly to put his own personal imprint on the social media service, firing the board as well as anyone else who dissents with his views, slashing the rest of the workforce by 50% without consultation (and now getting roundly sued for it) and delivering a harsh message to any remaining employees that the company needs to shape up or else he will take it into bankruptcy.
Unsurprisingly, this has not gone down well at Twitter HQ and it was reported that 1,200 of the employees who survived the slaughter then went and quit on Thursday alone. This apparently leaves the company so short of engineering and software development expertise that Musk had to send out a mass email to staff on Friday morning saying; “Anyone who actually writes software, please report to the 10th floor at 2 p.m. today,” before then locking all employees out of Twitter’s offices until some time on Monday.
With the World Cup beginning on Sunday, global Twitter usage is likely to reach one of its highest-ever peaks and with all this chaos and lack of available trouble-shooting expertise, upcoming major platform crashes are considered to be likely. Watch this space.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Though short-term trends of Demand remain supportive, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests the recent rally may have become increasingly vulnerable and is likely to ultimately give way to the market’s dominant downtrend.
A few indexes, including the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 400 Mid-Cap Index have moved above their respective 200-day moving averages. The Mid-Cap Index itself has been outperforming the S&P 500 and broke out to a 16-month relative high in October. This demonstrates that while there are some pockets of strength to be found, improvements in the broader market have now stalled.
Remember, it is easy to be an investor in a bull market. Almost everything goes up with the trend, but it is not so easy when the primary trend is to the downside, as it still is. As in physics, trends in motion tend to stay in motion unless acted upon by an opposing force. In strictly market terms, that force must be strong enough to exhaust Supply and jump-start Demand, something that has not yet occurred.
The bottom line is that there is still not enough technical evidence to build a strong, compelling bullish case.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
It will be a short week of trading, with markets closed on Thursday for Thanksgiving and then closing early on Friday.
Earnings season is winding down but there will still be some notable reports next week, including Best Buy, Zoom, Dell, VMware, Hewlett Packard, Dick's Sporting Goods, Nordstrom and Deere.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 34% (up from 25% the previous week)
→Neutral: 26% (down from 28% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 40% (down from 47% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 8 (Bearish by 22 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the financial crisis bear market. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987).
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Pepsico) - up 1.6%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 2.8%
The NASDAQ-100 underperformed the S&P 500
Emerging Markets were broadly flat, while US Markets and International Developed Markets lost an equal amount of ground
Small and Mid Caps did a little worse than Large Caps
Growth underperformed Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 160 and fell by by 9 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 172 and rose by 11 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and but below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 59. SPY ended the week 17.1% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is now sitting right on its 50-day moving average but below its 90-day and long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 56. QQQ ended the week 29.5% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK: As crypto-world crumbles under the weight of greedy a**s and naked fraud, Nick Magiulli explores why the warning signs were there all the time** and why so many people ignored them and powered ahead into financial oblivion.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
DIGITAL DOLLAR PILOT
Nine U.S. financial institutions, including Citibank, Wells Fargo, and Mastercard launched a pilot program working with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to test the feasibility of a digital dollar based on distributed ledger technology.
Several U.S. financial institutions are collaborating to test the feasibility of a digital dollar based on distributed ledger technology.
The pilot will run for 12 weeks in a test environment and will involve central banks, commercial banks, and regulated non-banks.
The project is the most significant step to date in creating a digital dollar to improve financial settlements. The Biden administration has recommended the creation of a digital dollar and the U.S. has recently begun putting resources into the effort. Other countries are also exploring plans to create their own central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).
The proof-of-concept project is a 12-week effort that will test the feasibility of an interoperable digital money platform called the regulated liability network (RLN).3 It will use a distributed ledger—like the blockchain technology behind bitcoin. The goal is to improve financial settlements and will involve central banks, commercial banks, and regulated non-banks.
The U.S. dollar will be represented as tokens and settled through simulated central bank reserves on a shared multi-entity distributed ledger. The pilot will be conducted in a test environment and will use a technology provided by SETL and Digital Asset.
Global payments provider SWIFT is also participating in the effort. The New York Innovation Center, part of the New York Fed, is also involved.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
In a horror movie, it often happens that the poor young person being chased in the house gets right to the front door and is just about to escape onto the street when the killer suddenly jumps out and grabs them. As an audience, we are teased with the prospect of good news when, suddenly, that hope is snatched away. That’s pretty much what happened in the stock market last week, specifically with the critical aftermath of the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee meeting on Wednesday.
The market bled steadily lower early in the week amid mostly quiet news flow. On Tuesday, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) for September showed openings of 10.7 million which was was a surprising increase from August, defying economists’ forecast for a decline. For stocks, the jolt was to the downside. Investors are currently looking for any excuse the Fed could use to pause its rate hikes. A slowing economy would be Reason Number One. But more job openings suggests the opposite - it suggests a still-strong economy that could force employers to offer higher wages to fill opened jobs. That's a recipe for more inflation, not less.
Markets continued to heavily punish the companies that fail to match earnings expectations. You can see from the market heat-map below in LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS who the most beaten-up victims were.
But spirits initially lifted on Wednesday when the Fed dangled some teasing “pivot-y” language with its statement announcing a 0.75% rate hike, saying that a slowdown decision could come soon and that further moves will take into account “cumulative tightening”, policy lags and additional upcoming economic data.
The stock market lapped this language up, taking it to imply a more measured response going forward, in recognition of the fact that there has been a lot of cumulative raises in interest rates already and that the lag-time involved meant that those hikes previously made could have baked in some future benefits, reducing the Fed’s need to add to them quite so enthusiastically.
Markets thought they got what they wanted from the Fed’s penultimate meeting of the year, before it was cruelly snatched away.
In the subsequent press conference, Fed chair Jerome Powell emphasized that the central bank has “a ways to go” in tightening policy enough to bring inflation down to its 2% target, and for that reason, he declared it premature to talk about pausing rate increases. “We have some ground to cover with interest rates,” he said, adding that “there’s no sense that inflation is coming down.”
He would not be drawn, despite the best efforts of the financial news hacks at the presser, on predicting the all-important Terminal Rate (the rate of the Fed Funds rate on the day that the Fed announces an end to the rate hike cycle).
He did say “I would want people to understand our commitment to getting this done, and to not making the mistake of not doing enough or the mistake of withdrawing our strong policy and doing that too soon,” . Scary stuff and kryptonite to stock prices.
Simply put, the message Powell sent out was that the size of future rate hikes will have no effect on when the Fed stops raising them and that these two are not particularly inter-dependent. Seeing a slowing in the extent of the rate hikes (0.50% or even 0.25% instead of 0.75%) does not necessarily indicate that the Terminal Rate (which is a far more important consideration) will be lower as a result. This distinction has now been made very clear. It sent stocks tumbling when it sunk in. The killer had just jumped onto the screen, brandishing a pretty large knife.
As investors absorbed what they had just heard, selling picked up rapidly throughout the rest of the afternoon during and after Powell’s words. The NASDAQ index, the epicenter of market valuation worries and brimming with companies that are most heavily impacted by higher interest rates, dropped over 3%. By the end of the day, the market had experienced its worst intra-day reaction to a Fed meeting since Elton John asked us all if we could feel the love tonight in 1994.
The mostly spectacular performance of equities in October suggested that the market really expected to thrown a bone by the Fed on Wednesday but was strongly disappointed. Friday’s recovery, driven by a mostly neutral jobs report which showed the unemployment rate climbing from 3.5% to 3.7%, helped to cut into the losses somewhat, but a good number of stocks (mostly in the Technology and Communication Services sector) had a rather dire week.
OTHER NEWS
And then there was one .. Remember back in the day when we all thought that an exclusive group of about six mega-tech names was driving the whole market higher? Well membership of that club is now down to just one. Even after a really bad week for the stock, Apple (AAPL) is still bigger (as measured by market capitalization) than ex-group members Meta/Facebook (META), Alphabet/Google (GOOGL) and Amazon (AMZN) combined!
Shilling for crypto .. Disgraced ex-UK prime minister Boris Johnson will address a cryptocurrency conference in Singapore next month as he forges a speaking career. Having failed to secure a second stint in the job, BoJo will be the featured keynote speaker at the International Symposium on Blockchain Advancements on December 2nd. He remains the Member of Parliament for his constituency but will skip attending Parliament in order to speak at the event. It is currently unknown how much he will be paid for his address, but he recently skipped his Parliamentary responsibilities to fly to the US to make a 30-minute speech to the Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers in Colorado for which he was paid $150k, which is close to double the annual salary of a UK Member of Parliament.
Crypto evangelists are getting more and more desperate to try and restore some kind of credibility after a long “crypto winter” (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) during which prices have crashed and multiple criminal crypto frauds have been exposed, resulting in institutional and individual investors losing billions of dollars. Johnson is not the only former high-level politician speaking at the event in Singapore. He will be joined by Dick Cheney, the US vice-president from 2001 to 2009.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Despite the difficulties experienced recently by some big name stocks, broad market elements that often occur at major market bottoms, such as panic selling swiftly followed by panic buying on volume spikes, are still AWOL. In particular, volume showed no sign of spiking at or near the lows and is not increasing as it kind of needs to whenever Demand comes rushing back in.
Although some markets find their bottoms when everyone loses interest, the majority form when urgent selling pushes prices lower to the point where sellers are exhausted and buyers finally believe stocks are attractive. It is simply difficult to find evidence of this process yet.
Of the giant stocks that led the multi-year bull market into the January 2022 peak, Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Tesla (TSLA), and Alphabet/Google (GOOGL) are all at or near one year lows, but a worryingly high percentage of small-cap stocks are also in the same kind of territory. With both the “generals” and the “soldiers” showing weakness and the S&P 500 now simply back to where it was in June, it is difficult to see how a bottom formation is underway.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This week will be another busy one for investors: the U.S. midterm elections, the latest inflation data, and a continued parade of Q3 earnings reports from the likes of Disney, Dupont, Occidental Petroleum, Activision, Take-Two Interactive, NRG, Ralph Lauren, Mosaic, Tapestry and DR Horton.
Voting in the mid-terms on Tuesday will determine control of Congress for the next two years, with Republicans favored to win the House of Representatives and polling suggesting they may also win control in a close race in the Senate. Results may take days to become clear in several states, with even run-offs possible (I’m looking at you, Georgia). The stock market actually tends to quite like gridlock between the branches of government as it basically means less change.
But the big daddy event of the week is Thursday's release of the October Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of US inflation. The consensus estimate is for a 0.7% increase in retail prices month-to-month and for a lower annualized rate of 8.0%. The Core CPI, which excludes food and energy components, is expected to have risen by 0.5% month-to-month and 6.6% from a year earlier.
The University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Index will be out on Friday and is expected to also be about flat with the previous month's reading.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 31% (up from 27% the previous week)
→Neutral: 36% (up from 28% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 33% (down from 46% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 2 (Bearish by 19 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the financial crisis bear market. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987).
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil and Chevron) - up 2.4%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Meta/Facebook, Alphabet/Google) - down 6.8%
The NASDAQ-100 severely underperformed the S&P 500
Emerging Markets were the big winners last week, way ahead of US Markets and International Developed Markets
Mid Caps did less badly than Small Caps which then did less badly than Large Caps
Growth meaningfully underperformed Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 149 and fell by by 10 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 172 and rose by 10 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, has now moved back below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 50. SPY ended the week 21.2% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, has now moved back below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 42. QQQ ended the week 34.5% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Long-time readers know I can never resist an article that exposes the futility of making market predictions. Those who claim to know how to do so with any meaningful degree of success are liars and frauds.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
CRYPTO WINTER
Crypto winter is a common expression that refers to a poorly performing cryptocurrency market. The term is comparable to a bear market in the stock market. A crypto winter signifies negative sentiment and lower average asset values among a large swath of digital currencies.
Research shows that crypto winters have a major impact on investor mentality.1 Looking at the cryptocurrency price history, it's sometimes easy to spot a crypto winter because the downturn may come with a double-digit percentage drop in crypto values.
There have been several crypto winters in the past. For example, from late 2017 to December 2020, crypto prices fell and hovered far off from prior peak prices. However, in December 2020, prices exploded to record highs in a significant crypto bull market.
There are no widely accepted, specific guidelines for how far cryptocurrency prices must fall to be considered a crypto winter. But market leaders and influencers tend to agree publicly when one has begun, as was the case in early 2022.2
Due to the volatility of crypto markets, it's impossible to accurately predict future price changes. However, it's wise for crypto investors to be aware that crypto winters happen.
Though the stock market has shown a pattern of ebbs and flows, cryptocurrency has a far shorter history of just over a decade. It is possible that any crypto winter could go on forever. In a worst-case scenario for investors, a long-term cryptocurrency winter could lead to lower and lower asset values as they approach zero.
Cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency exchanges operate under minimal financial regulations. Though several crypto companies have fallen in the crosshairs of regulators, the majority of them operate with little scrutiny. This sets the stage for fraud and scams that consumers should remain aware of, including the risk of losses when holding crypto over the long term.4
How Is Crypto Winter Different From a Bear Market? The term bear market commonly refers to a period when stocks are lower in value, often due to a mix of economic factors. Though a bear market and crypto winter can coincide, they are not necessarily correlated.
Stock prices are determined by market forces, and investors rely on fundamental and technical analysis strategies to determine target prices. With cryptocurrencies, valuation models are in their infancy. This can lead to a major disconnect between stocks and cryptocurrencies.
However, as the crypto winter that began in 2021 demonstrates, there's also a possibility that a down stock market can happen simultaneously with a down crypto market.
In a typical crypto winter, the majority of cryptocurrencies are affected. Though there's a possibility for exceptions, investors should plan on a market-wide downturn during crypto winter periods. It's impossible to predict accurately when a crypto winter will begin or end. Following cryptocurrency news and tracking activities among cryptocurrency communities on social media networks like Twitter, Reddit, and Discord can offer insights into investor sentiment and planned investments.
Some cryptocurrency skeptics argue that cryptocurrencies have no intrinsic value and will eventually fall to zero. On the other hand, crypto enthusiasts expect the crypto marketplace to grow and evolve into an essential part of the global economy. There's no guarantee as to which camp is right or if the answer falls somewhere in the middle. It's up to investors and buyers to determine the true value of digital assets.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
There was such a torrent of market intel to try to absorb last week that it was hard to keep up at times. It also meant that leads got buried all over the place as news and data points that would usually be the focus of market attention for a matter of days were eclipsed within hours or even minutes by yet another surprising earnings report, economic data release, geopolitical development, global interest rate change or piece of eye-popping housing market data.
Let’s try to quickly make sense of it all ..
The final outcome was sharply bifurcated market performance. In the very red corner were technology and communication services stocks, a few of whom had a rather catastrophic week, as we will discuss shortly. In the nicely green corner was pretty much everything else, which mostly moved agreeably higher over the course of the week.
There continues to be a fundamental re-pricing of the stocks of many technology-related firms, which seem to still be highly vulnerable to continued declines, while the more traditional parts of the economy, whose stocks trade at broadly lower valuations, are proving extremely resilient since the headline indexes started their latest bounce a couple of weeks ago.
The announcement on Wednesday of underwhelming earnings and forward guidance pushed Alphabet/Google (GOOGL) and Microsoft (MSFT) down intraday by 9.1% and 7.7%, respectively. Then Meta/Facebook (META) saw a quarter of its value disappear in a puff of smoke in after-hours trading following a truly hideous set of earnings and outlook, with the stock price falling to levels not seen since October 2015.
The company’s recent metaverse pivot and massive hiring spree is proving to be an absolute disaster and it is being openly said by smarter people than me that the firm appears to be basically imploding right now. It doesn’t even make the list of the top twenty most valuable US companies any more. A major investor last week wrote a scathing open letter to CEO Mark (net worth a year ago: over $140 billion, net worth last week: less than $38 billion) Zuckerberg, reflecting the concerns and suggestions of many embattled shareholders.
Amazon (AMZN) stock also crapped out, briefly falling back to below its pre-pandemic levels, despite online sales having doubled since then, after issuing some rather ugly forward guidance. Apple (AAPL)'s results stood apart from the pack by being just kind of OK. The company beat expectations on the top and bottom lines, but reported weaker-than-expected iPhone sales.
Earlier in the week, the first of three estimates of Q3 US Gross Domestic Product (GDP) indicated that the economy had expanded at a sizzling 2.6% annual rate, ending the streak of two back-to-back quarterly contractions. This was well ahead of estimates. The American consumer is just unstoppable. Personal consumption expenditures, which account for the biggest part of the economy, continue to power ahead, rising 1.4% in Q3. GDP was also lifted by exports, financial services and government spending (mainly as a result of defense spending and higher wages).
Markets also spent much of the week digesting the conclusion of the National People’s Congress in China which secured President Xi a third term as party leader and effectively made him a dictator for life. This dented emerging market returns.
A more powerful Xi likely means:
Continued tech theft from the West
Focus on domestic “shared prosperity,” which may be a noble social goal, but is not usually great for earnings
A continuation of the Zero-COVID policy that has crippled China’s economic growth and contributed to the continued snarling of supply chains
Continued geopolitical tensions with the West based on intellectual property and military movements, particularly in regards to Taiwan
Market anxiety around the recent UK fiscal debacle seemed to recede once it emerged that there were finally something resembling grown-ups in the room who are starting to clean up the mess now that the kids’ loud and crazy party is thankfully over. The markets also heaved a huge sigh of relief that Boris is now safely back in the bin. The whole bonkers episode was an unnecessary, short-term negative influence, but it didn’t change the core underlying drivers of this bear market.
While the UK may finally be putting the last few years of reckless populist nonsense into its rearview mirror, Italy appears to now be taking center stage. In one of her first pronouncements after taking office, the new Italian prime ministerGiorgia Meloni openly questioned the European Central Bank (ECB)'s decision to raise interest rates to counter rampant European inflation (including Italy’s own 12% rate). The ECB declined to take any notice of her advice however, raising interest rates by 0.75% for the second time in a row on Thursday.
The situation in Ukraine continues to deteriorate. The recent decline in most commodity prices has been mistaken as being associated with some kind of easing of tensions in the war - it’s absolutely not.
Contrary to conventional wisdom or what you might hear from the clowns on FinTok, it’s perfectly possible for the situation in Ukraine to continue to worsen and commodity prices to keep falling. The reason that they are falling has nothing to do with the Ukraine conflict, it’s because of the prospect of a global demand slowdown due to a possible worldwide recession.
Last week, the Bank of Canada followed its Australian counterpart, unexpectedly slowing its pace of interest-rate hikes to “just” 0.50% compared with the consensus expectation of a 0.75% rise. It should be remembered though that central banks simply moving rates higher by a bit less than expected does not constitute the holy grail of the “pivot”, the definition of which is when the central bank clearly signals that interest rate increases will end at a specific date. We are not there yet by any means, so an over-optimistic reaction to these lighter-than-expected hikes would be ill-advised.
Housing prices make up nearly 40% of the calculation of the monthly retail Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of inflation and while inflation pressures are well distributed throughout the economy, the biggest reason that CPI has not been meaningfully declining is because of recent buoyant home and rent prices.
On Tuesday, however, we learned that while housing prices are still up substantially on a year-over-year basis (13%), the rate of increase is falling (the previous month they were up by 15.6% annualized) at the fastest pace since the index was created in 1987.
National home prices fell almost 1% in the last thirty days alone, double the rate of the decline from the previous month. Then later in the week, we were told that new home sales fell nearly 11% from August to September and are down almost 18% year-on-year and that the average 30-year mortgage interest rate had moved above 7%, more than double where it was just a year ago. Indeed, this is the highest mortgage interest rate since Avril Lavigne asked us all why we had to go and make things so complicated in 2002.
This was all broadly viewed as positive for stocks over the longer term because these price declines and reduced demand will eventually begin to be reflected in CPI readings in the coming months and slowing inflation would signal to the Federal Reserve that its rate-hike policy is working. This could prompt the central bank to back down on additional aggressive rate hikes, thereby boosting investor sentiment and the outlook for the stock market.
OTHER NEWS
Grim retirement expectations .. Americans expect they would need $1.25 million to retire comfortably, according to new study from Northwest Mutual. The number is a 20% increase from the $1.05 million figure last year. At the same time, the study found Americans’ average existing retirement savings actually fell by 11% to less than $87k from $98k last year.
The average expected retirement age rose to 64.0 years old, up from 62.6 last year. This compares with the deemed Full Retirement Age (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) of 67 years old as determined for those born after 1960 by the Social Security Administration. The survey of 2,300 adults found that about 40% don’t think they’ll be ready to retire, while around one-third think there is a more than 50-50 chance they might outlive their retirement money. At the same time, 36% report that they have not proactively taken any steps at all to address this concern.
We want our money back .. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) finally approved a rule Wednesday that requires public companies whose financial statements contain errors or fraud to recoup their executives’ bonuses and other incentive pay.
The rule approved was required by the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act to discourage fraud and accounting mischief. The so-called clawback rule’s implementation has been delayed for years amid resistance from Republican lawmakers and (shocker!) corporate executives. Firms will have to start including check boxes on the front page of their annual reports to highlight whether an error correction or clawback analysis has been conducted.
Companies will also have to adopt policies to recover wrongfully awarded incentive pay from both current and former executives, going back as far as three years. The rule will take effect in roughly one year’s time.
Haters rejoice .. The self-anointed champion of worldwide freedom,Elon Musk, had a busy week. He completed his Twitter takeover, named himself Chief Twit, starred in a neither funny nor clever, but utterly cringeworthy “let that sink in” video of him arriving at Twitter HQ, wrote a bizarre, grotesquely self-important email to advertisers telling them that for some reason it’s really, really “important for the future of civilization” that it is he who owns, controls and sets the ground rules for society’s digital town square and then proceeded to immediately fire the company’s CEO, CFO, general counsel and top legal and policy executives, costing the company decades in industry-related professional expertise and experience and a reported $200 million in payoffs.
Hours later Musk tweeted “the bird is freed,” and, to the absolute delight of nutcase conspiracy theory peddlers, bullying sociopaths living in their parents’ basements and generally dim-witted, obnoxious people everywhere, pledged to limit Twitter’s moderation of toxic and dangerous content in favor of what he determines to be “free speech”. What could possibly go wrong?
UNDER THE HOOD:
The multiple big up-days closely clustered with big down-days that we have experienced over the last few months, with investor sentiment flip-flopping with alarming regularity, is not a sign of a market-bottoming process. Rather, it speaks to a lack of conviction by both bulls and bears, so much so that the news of the day (or even of the hour!) tends to create a short-lived stampede that lasts only until the next news item.
Bears can rightfully point to the fact that the pivotal Percent of Stocks 20% or More Below One Year Highs reading still remains stubbornly elevated at over 60%, maintaining the uptrend that has been in place since the March 2021 low. Head-fake failed bear market rallies have been known to push this figure temporarily back below 50%, including as recently as August this year but also in the midst of the Great Financial Crisis in May 2008, before it then resumed its course back to the upside as the indexes fell back again sharply.
The bottom line is that, despite some recent oversold conditions, the response from buyers has actually been pretty muted so far. The price gains of the last week or two seem strong - but beneath the surface the evidence for a sustainable uptrend is still not yet in place.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This will be another busy week with a lot more Q3 earnings reports coming out and two massive economic releases; the latest interest rate increase from the Federal Reserve on Wednesday afternoon (consensus expectation: a hike of 0.75%) and the October jobs report before the market open on Friday (average expectation: payrolls 225k higher and the unemployment rate ticking up to 3.6%).
Among the 160 or so S&P 500 companies scheduled to report this week are Pfizer, Airbnb, Starbucks, Paypal, Moderna, Qualcomm, Illumina, CVS, eBay, Conoco Phillips, Uber, BP, Duke Energy, Paramount, Warner Bros, Newmont, Advanced Micro Devices, Cardinal Health and Marathon Petroleum.
Tuesday’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) will provide additional insight into the state of the U.S. labor market. Expecations are for 9.75 million job openings on the last business day of September, which would be down by 300,000 from a month earlier.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 27% (up from 23% the previous week)
→Neutral: 28% (up from 21% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 46% (down from 56% the previous week)
Net Bull-Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 19 (Bearish by 33 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5th 2009, right near the end of the financial crisis bear market. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was recorded at 6% on August 21st 1987, not long before the stock market crash of October 1987).
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Industrials (two biggest holdings: Raytheon Technologies, Honeywell International) - up 7.1%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Meta/Facebook, Alphabet/Google) - down 2.3%
The S&P 500 significantly outperformed the NASDAQ-100
US Markets and International Developed Markets did much better than Emerging Markets
Small Caps beat out Mid Caps which itself beat out Large Caps
Value meaningfully outperformed Growth
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 159 and rose by by 17 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 162 and fell by 15 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, has now moved above its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 59. SPY ended the week 18.6% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and also below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 53. QQQ ended the week 30.4% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Save Like A Pessimist, Invest Like An Optimist. Morgan Housel’s latest dose of wonderful investing common sense. For more, read his book “The Psychology Of Money”, probably my favorite personal finance publication.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
FULL RETIREMENT AGE (FRA)
Full retirement age (FRA), also known as normal retirement age, is the age at which you can receive full retirement benefits from Social Security. Full retirement age varies depending on the year you were born. FRA is 66 years and two months for people born in 1955, and it gradually rises to 67 for those born in 1960 or later.
In the U.S., the FRA for Social Security benefits is 67 for people born in 1960 or afterward. It is 66 for people born from 1943 to 1954, and 66 and two, four, six, eight, or 10 months for people born from 1955 to 1959 (the retirement age increases by two months per birth year).
You can elect to receive Social Security benefits starting at age 62, but claiming benefits at an age below your FRA will reduce your benefit permanently. For example, if your FRA is 67 and you begin claiming benefits at age 62, the monthly benefit will be 70% of the benefit available at full retirement age. You will get 86.7% of the full retirement benefit if you start claiming benefits at 65.
If you were born in 1943 or later, your benefit will increase by 8% for each year you delay claiming it after your FRA. Waiting until you reach 70 will yield the maximum benefit. There’s no reason to wait beyond age 70 because your benefits won't increase further.
You can collect Social Security retirement benefits at your FRA while continuing to work. If you begin collecting Social Security before your full retirement age and earn over a certain amount, your benefits will be temporarily reduced. When you reach your FRA, there is no limit on how much you can earn while collecting full benefits.
FRA also applies to pension plans, such as employer-sponsored plans. Police officers, military service members, and other public servants typically receive full benefits after a certain number of service years, rather than at a specific age.
The average retirement age for Americans has increased by about three years over the past three decades, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Even so, on average, Americans are retiring before they reach full retirement age. Men retire at an average age of 64.6 years. The average retirement age for women is 62.3 years.
The increase in the average retirement age has been fueled in large part by the later retirements of college graduates, research from Boston College shows. For example, men with college degrees retire three years later than men who are high school graduates.
One major reason workers (both men and women) who are high school graduates tend to retire earlier is that their health and life expectancy haven't improved as much as those of college graduates over the past century. Their jobs also tend to be more physically demanding, and they are not able to take as much time off as workers with college degrees.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
A Wall Street Journal report on Friday by Nick “The Fed Whisperer” Timiraos reported that, while the early November Fed meeting will still most likely result in another 0.75% increase in interest rates, it could well be the final one that showcases a hike of that magnitude and that committee members are now actively contemplating easing up in December and beyond.
Interestingly, on the same day, San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly warned of the risk of over-tightening, the first time we have heard that sentiment in a long while.
As a result, the futures market (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) implied the probability of a 0.75% hike in December to be at 50%, down from 75% just a day earlier, while the chances of a “only” a 0.50% rate rise in December increased to 47%, up from 24% in the same 24-hour period, suggesting it’s basically a tossup between the two outcomes.
This was one of number of small, incremental pieces of good news for markets that we witnessed last week that saw both the S&P 500 and NASDAQ rise about 5%.
Some 72% of the S&P 500 companies reporting Q3 earnings thus far have beaten Wall Street's expectations although it's important to note that these expectations are historically low. Most bank earnings were solid, notably Goldman Sachs (GS) but, as you can see in THE WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR below, this forthcoming week is the big one when it comes to earnings and we will be in a much better position to judge how things look by this time next week.
I mentioned last weekend that the smart money had UK prime minister Liz (“I’m a fighter, not a quitter”) Truss gone by Christmas but, as it turned out, she didn’t even make it to Thursday lunchtime as her domestic approval rating dipped to the annual rate of UK inflation, not very far ahead of that of Vladimir Putin and she finally threw in the towel after a whole 44 days in charge of the fifth largest economy in the world. The markets initially reacted positively to her departure and the incineration of her crazy economic lab experiment and global bond yields pulled back and the rampaging dollar stalled a bit.
However, as the specter was raised late Friday of a possible return to chaos with disgraced ex-prime minister Boris Johnson poised to make an improbable comeback, markets began to show understandable renewed nervousness.
We shouldn’t expect the S&P 500 to recoup all the losses directly brought about by this British psychodrama because there are scars from the whole episode that will take time to heal.
It’s important to enjoy the good days and the appearance of some chink of light at the end of what has been a long, dark tunnel so I’m not trying to minimize the recent rebound, as it does seem more legitimate than any we’ve seen this year. But the outlook for stocks still remains very challenged until such time as we see that inflation is definitely declining.
It still remains a broadly uncomplicated market. The global economy has a big inflation problem. Recessions are better than entrenched inflation (neither are good but the former is better than the latter) so central banks everywhere will continue to raise interest rates to cool inflation to a tolerable target (not 2%, but something probably between 3%-4%).
Those rate hikes will inevitably cause recessions, which of themselves will help fix inflation. Once that is done, these same central banks will eventually start to cut interest rates to stimulate the economy and growth will resume, albeit with a higher level of inflation than we had back in 2019.
It’s a process we must endure and there have been speed-bumps that still persist in the form of external shocks; oil price volatility, Russia/Ukraine, Chinese COVID lockdowns, economic and political havoc in the UK and now increasingly the US midterm election circus (we are less than a month away), but inflation is by far the dominant core issue and things will not meaningfully or sustainably improve until we get definitive proof that inflation is receding.
For anyone with a multi-year time horizon, remember that the Federal Reserve is going to break inflation eventually (best piece of Wall Street advice out there: don’t fight the Fed) and then they will at some point cut interest rates and re-stimulate the economy. So this absolutely will end and it will create a 2000-2002-type opportunity for longer term investors.
Do not get shaken out by fear, hyperbole or know-nothing simpletons spouting crap on TikTok. Make sure you read this week’s ARTICLE OF THE WEEK below for actual sensible advice.
OTHER NEWS
2023 updates .. The IRS last week raised 401k and IRA contribution limits by the most in 25 years and I wrote an article on what you need to know. I also updated my article “Is The Backdoor Roth IRA Contribution Right For You?” for 2023 and my “Workplace Benefits Explained” post has also been updated for next year, great if you are changing jobs or are undergoing open enrollment.
“Certain” recession in the US? .. Economists at Bloomberg maintain a quantitative model to predict recession odds that incorporates 13 macroeconomic and financial factors. The latest run of the model last week put those odds at 100% in the next 12 months. In the previous release, the model assigned a mere 65% odds to a U.S. recession in the next twelve months. The new run also assigned 73% odds, up from 30%, to a recession within eleven months.
Other Wall Street forecasters have also increased their projected odds of a recession in recent months, though few have described it with the certainty implied by the Bloomberg model.
Ready for some really, really big numbers? .. New numbers from the Treasury last week showed the federal budget shortfall was chopped in half in the last fiscal year (which ended last month), falling to $1.38 trillion (that’s $1,380,000,000,000).
Federal spending was $6.3 trillion, down more than 8% from the previous year. That drop largely reflects the end of COVID-related government programs. Meanwhile, government revenues rose by $850 billion, to $4.9 trillion. That was due, in part, to higher individual income taxes on the back of a strong labor market and wage gains for workers.
The road ahead looks more troubling, however. For one, the economy is cooling down, and many economists expect the unemployment rate to rise in the year ahead. So while the labor market caught a tailwind in the last fiscal year, headwinds may appear in 2023.
But possibly most damaging of all is that interest rates are rising, putting upward pressure on the cost of federal interest payments. Earlier this year, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that interest costs alone could top $1 trillion by 2032 — or 3.3% of GDP, more than double its share this year and rates have only moved up even faster since then.
UNDER THE HOOD:
There has finally been a noticeable reduction in the intensity of selling activity and downside momentum in the short term, but change is slow in the outlook of the ongoing primary downtrend, which still needs to be greatly respected.
Clustered days of very heavy buying and very heavy selling are more likely to reflect simply high volatility than a klaxon announcing the end of the bear market. Much more evidence is required to issue anything close to a technical all-clear signal.
It is important to recognize that it is the weight of the evidence, not just a one or two factors, that is paramount. Nonetheless, there are some technical bright spots such as the recent outperformance of smaller and mid-size stocks, which were the most beaten down and are therefore expected to turn first in the case of a market bottom. Also outperforming last week were less defensive sectors like Technology, Energy and Consumer Cyclical.
We do need to remember that it’s a post-COVID world that is still trying to get back into normal rhythms and some of these indicators that worked so well in the past could have different and less predictable timelines than they used to.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Stocks will face the heart of the Q3 reporting season this week with more than 150 Big Tech firms and other corporate giants set to deliver results. These include Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook, Amazon, Coca-Cola, Exxon-Mobil, Intel, McDonalds, Chevron, Ford, Boeing, UPS, Visa, Discover, General Electric, General Motors, T-Mobile, Mastercard, Comcast, Merck, Kraft Heinz, Southwest Airlines, 3M, Chipotle, Haliburton, Texas Instruments and NextEra Energy.
Economists will be watching for the first of three official estimates of Q3 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) out next week. Forecasts call for a seasonally adjusted annual growth rate of 1.7%, following declines in Q1 and Q2 2022 of 1.6% and 0.6% respectively.
Other data highlights next week will include the Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ Indexes for October and Personal Income and Consumption data for September.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 23% (up from 20% the previous week)
→Neutral: 21% (down from 24% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 56% (unchanged from 56% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 33 (Bearish by 36 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5, 2009 near the end of the financial crisis bear market. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was 6% on August 21, 1987 not long before the stock market crash of October 1987).
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - up 9.1%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Pepsico) - up 2.1%
The NASDAQ-100 outperformed the S&P 500
US Markets did much better than International Developed Markets and Emerging Markets
Large Cap stocks beat out Mid and Small
Growth meaningfully outperformed Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 142 and rose by by 11 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 177 and fell by 12 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and also below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 51. SPY ended the week 21.7% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and also below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 49. QQQ ended the week 31.8% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK: “The riskier stocks feel, the less risky they get over time .. What I do know is that when the S&P 500 is down more than 25%, you buy it, no questions asked.” Michael Batnick on being smart right now.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
FUTURES MARKETS
A futures market is an auction market in which participants buy and sell commodity and futures contracts for delivery on a specified future date. Futures are exchange-traded derivatives contracts that lock in future delivery of a commodity or security at a price set today.
Examples of futures markets are the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), the Chicago Board of Trade (CBoT), the CBOE Options Exchange (CBOE), and the Minneapolis Grain Exchange.
Originally, such trading was carried on through open outcry and the use of hand signals in trading pits, located in financial hubs such as New York, Chicago, and London. Throughout the 21st century, like most other markets, futures exchanges have become mostly electronic.
In order to understand fully what a futures market is, it’s important to understand the basics of futures contracts, the assets traded in these markets.
Futures contracts are made in an attempt by producers and suppliers of commodities to avoid market volatility. These producers and suppliers negotiate contracts with an investor who agrees to take on both the risk and reward of a volatile market.
Futures markets or futures exchanges are where these financial products are bought and sold for delivery at some agreed-upon date in the future with a price fixed at the time of the deal. Futures markets are for more than simply agricultural contracts, and now involve the buying, selling and hedging of financial products and future values of interest rates.
Futures contracts can be made or "created" as long as open interest is increased, unlike other securities that are issued. The size of futures markets (which usually increase when the stock market outlook is uncertain) is larger than that of commodity markets and is a key part of the financial system.
Large futures markets run their own clearinghouses, where they can both make revenue from the trading itself and from the processing of trades after the fact. Some of the biggest futures markets that operate their own clearinghouses include the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the ICE, and Eurex. Other markets like Cboe have outside clearinghouses (Options Clearing Corporation) settle trades.
Almost all futures markets are registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the main U.S. body in charge of regulation of futures markets. Exchanges are usually regulated by the nation’s regulatory body in the country in which they are based.
For instance, if a coffee farm sells green coffee beans at $4 per pound to a roaster, and the roaster sells that roasted pound at $10 per pound and both are making a profit at that price, they’ll want to keep those costs at a fixed rate. The investor agrees that if the price for coffee goes below a set rate, the investor agrees to pay the difference to the coffee farmer.
If the price of coffee goes higher than a certain price, the investor gets to keep profits. For the roaster, if the price of green coffee goes above an agreed rate, the investor pays the difference and the roaster gets the coffee at a predictable rate. If the price of green coffee is lower than an agreed-upon rate, the roaster pays the same price and the investor gets the profit.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The market spent the first three days of last week just shifting about in a bumpy, lethargic, generally downward-trending trading pattern, simply waiting it out for the main event in the form of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation number release due on Thursday morning. There was certainly no sign that the buyers from the week before were looking to capitalize on their brief success and take any kind of control.
Even when the starter course arrived on Wednesday in the form of a slightly hotter-than-expected measure of wholesale inflation, the Producer Price Index (PPI), there was little reaction in advance of CPI, the main course. PPI climbed 0.4% in September after a 0.2% decline in August. Compared to a year earlier, the index was up 8.5%, down from 8.7% the previous month as energy prices eased. The Core number, which excludes food, energy and trade services, rose 0.4% month-on-month, but this was largely in line with expectations.
The reaction to the CPI release when it did come out the next day before the market opened was quite extraordinary. And ultimately baffling. Month-to month inflation from August to September rose by 0.4%, twice as quickly as the expected 0.2% pace. Compared to a year ago, prices were up 8.2%. Last month, that figure was 8.3%. Core inflation, which strips out food and energy costs, rose 0.6% in a month in September, unchanged from the August increase. This Core measure is now up 6.6% from a year ago and that’s the highest since Joan Jett shared with us all that she loved rock ‘n roll back in 1982.
The Fed is desperately trying to get inflation under control, but you wouldn’t know it from looking at those numbers. While energy prices are falling hard, inflation in services, shelter and transportation is still running seriously hot and even the notoriously free-spending American consumer is going to be facing some very hard choices as we head into the winter and holiday season.
Sometimes the stock and bond markets just do exactly what you expect them to. This was the case when the opening bell rang on the stock exchange an hour after the release of the CPI data. Interest rates skyrocketed, with the 10 year Treasury soaring above 4.07% at one point, territory not seen since 2008. Stocks swiftly crumbled to new 2022 lows again and well beyond. Within a couple of minutes of the open, the S&P 500 had dived over 2.5% and the NASDAQ was down by more than 3%. Things looked downright apocalyptic.
And then the strangest thing happened. As if by magic, everything suddenly turned around for no apparent reason. By 11:15am, all the day’s losses had been extinguished and things just carried on higher and higher, with both indexes ending the day well over 2% up from Wednesday’s close having round-tripped 5% intra-day. The last time the stock market bounced back that far from an intra-day decline of that size was in August 2011.
Finding a sensible reason for the abrupt turnaround, however, proved surprisingly tricky. All I could find were some rather unconvincing explanations like:
“Things have been miserable for while and we were due for a bounce”. If the indexes had finished lower on Thursday, they would have logged their longest losing streak since February 2020.
“Rent inflation may not be as bad as the CPI report showed”. Rents are factored into CPI on a lagging basis, meaning that the trend for shelter inflation might not actually be as awful as it appeared in the CPI report, since rent costs appear, anecdotally at least, to be moderating in real time.
“Inflation remained high, but no one was expecting it to be low”. If inflation causes the Fed to tighten monetary policy too much, it would eventually correct course by loosening monetary policy again. That would, in theory, be good news for stocks (this one I found to be particularly absurd).
“A technical bounce on the charts”. The initial price falls first thing in the morning hit some ancient trend-line drawn on some chart going back years and the market has a long memory.
Those all seem like poking around to find pennies in a fresh pile of cow dung to me, retro-fitting some tiny silver lining to a very large cloud. I could not find a single compelling reason given for the exceptional price spike and, believe me, I looked.
And so, while the champagne corks were popping on the New York Stock Exchange and giddy talk abounded that we had finally found “The Bottom”, a good number of us were just scratching our heads asking “WTF did we just see? And why?”
It took just 24 hours for this latest false start to be exposed as sham built on nothing. By the end of yet another ugly Friday, both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ had had yet another losing week.
Beyond the CPI number, other factors also weighed on stocks last week. A number of Chinese cities moved to reimpose COVID lockdowns, but the main external culprit was across the pond.
Renewed turmoil in the UK government bond and currency market reached a crescendo on Friday after the Bank of England (BOE) refused to extend its program of stabilization through market intervention and British finance minister Kwarteng was summoned home early from Washington DC where he was meeting with his counterparts from around the world, only to be fired by a text from Prime Minister Liz Truss as soon as his plane landed, triggering a full blown political crisis to add to the financial chaos.
The global financial markets, the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK), most of Britain’s leading economists, the bulk of Truss’ own rebelling party and the vast majority of the UK electorate had all already expressed varying degrees of despair and/or anger at the bizarro-world plan of apparently unfunded massive tax cuts announced by Kwarteng that now apparently threatens the financial stability of the fifth largest economy in the world and a blood sacrifice was required. The smart money has Truss gone by Christmas.
OTHER NEWS
Ugly .. The IMF cut its global economic growth forecast for next year, warning that “the worst is yet to come.” It reduced its 2023 outlook from a gain of 2.9% in July to 2.7% now, with a 25% probability it could fall below 2.0%. That’s the weakest estimate since 2001, except during the global financial crisis and the outbreak of COVID. The World Bank endorsed these miserable prognoses.
Having said that, the ARTICLE OF THE WEEK below emphasizes how rubbish people and organizations are at making predictions.
Nice bump, but .. About 66 million Social Security recipients will see their benefits rise 8.7% starting in January, the highest inflation-linked cost-of-living adjustment since 1981, but the soaring cost of food, rent and other essentials means it won’t stretch that far for most of them.
The average $1,656 retirement benefit will increase by $144.10. The standard Medicare Part B monthly premium will decrease by $5.20 for 2023, which will further boost the checks of recipients who get their premiums automatically deducted from their Social Security checks.
However, more of retirees’ income could be subject to federal income taxes. The IRS will soon announce the 2023 standard deduction and the inflation-adjusted dollar thresholds for each income tax bracket, which could eat into many retirees’ take-home.
UNDER THE HOOD:
The Percent of Stocks 30% or More Below One Year Highs is an important measure of the most beaten-down stocks. It not only shifted higher when the June-August bear market rally died, but it has since returned to levels worse than it recorded at the June 16th low. In other words, such low prices did not spark committed buying in this supposedly “on sale” area of the market. This is suggestive of a lack of desire to even nibble on stocks, let alone enthusiastically backing up any trucks.
The same conclusion can be drawn from the fact that 80% of all stocks are now below their 10-week moving averages, a historically extremely low level which usually triggers swift dip-buying, but there’s simply no sign of this right now. That is troubling as the longer these figures remain depressed without any sustained demand reaction, the more likely prices are to simply drift lower as buyers require even better bargains to overcome their doubts.
Since the expiration of this summer’s head-fake rally, the balance of Demand and Supply has materially weakened. In that time, Buying Power has resumed its long-term downtrend, hitting new bear market lows last week while conversely, Selling Pressure has turned meaningfully higher, Historically, such patterns are signs of a stock market that is highly vulnerable to further intermediate-term downside.
I could go on, but you get the picture ..
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Q3 earnings season really picks up this week, with more than 60 S&P 500 companies scheduled to report, including Netflix, Tesla, IBM, Johnson and Johnson, Goldman Sachs, Blackstone, Bank of America, Proctor and Gamble, American Express, Verizon, AT&T, Snap, Charles Schwab, American Airlines, Dow Chemical, Schlumberger, Lockheed Martin and Intuitive Surgical.
Lots of housing data out next week, the highlights beingthe Housing Market Index for October and Existing Home Sales for September.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 20% (down from 24% the previous week)
→Neutral: 24% (up from 21% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 56% (up from 55% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 36 (Bearish by 31 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
For context: Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5, 2009 near the end of the financial crisis bear market. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was 6% on August 21, 1987 not long before the stock market crash of October 1987).
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor & Gamble, Pepsico) - up 1.6%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon and Tesla) - down 4.2%
The NASDAQ-100 materially underperformed the S&P 500
While US Markets and International Developed Markets performed equally badly, Emerging Markets did much worse
Small Cap stocks did better than Mid Cap stocks which in turn handily beat out Large Cap stocks
Growth once again did substantially worse than Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 131 and fell by by 14 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 189 and rose by 15 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 35. SPY ended the week 25.1% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 33. QQQ ended the week 35.5% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:We will soon be knee-deep in analysts’ confident projections of what the stock market will do next year. This article will hopefully convince you to tune out all this nonsense by showing that the forecasts of so-called “experts” have been absolutely useless since forever with, at best, the same predictive ability as a coin flip.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (IMF)
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an international organization that provides financial assistance and advice to member countries and has become integral to the development of financial markets worldwide and the growth of developing countries.
The IMF came into formal existence in 1944 following the Bretton Woods Conference held the year before. Along with its sister organization, the World Bank, it was created to prevent economic crises such as the Great Depression. It is a specialized agency of the United Nations and is run by its 190 member countries. Membership is open to any country that conducts foreign policy and accepts the organization's statutes.
The IMF is responsible for the creation and maintenance of the international monetary system, the system by which international payments among countries take place. It provides a systematic mechanism for foreign exchange transactions in order to foster investment and promote balanced global economic trade.
To achieve these goals, the IMF focuses and advises on the macroeconomic policies of a country, which impacts its exchange rate, governmental budget, money, and credit management. The IMF will also appraise a country's financial sector and regulatory policies, as well as structural policies within the macroeconomy that relate to the labor market and employment.
In addition, as a fund, it may offer financial assistance to nations in need of correcting balance of payment discrepancies. The IMF is entrusted with nurturing economic growth and maintaining high levels of employment within countries.
The IMF is funded by quota subscriptions paid by member states. The size of each quota is determined by the size of each member's economy. The quota in turn determines the weight each country has within the IMF—and hence its voting rights—as well as how much financing it can receive from the IMF. Twenty-five percent of each country's quota is paid in the form of special drawing rights (SDRs), which are a claim on the freely usable currencies of IMF members.
The IMF offers its assistance in the form of surveillance, which it conducts on a yearly basis for individual countries, regions, and the global economy as a whole. However, a country may ask for financial assistance if it finds itself in an economic crisis, whether caused by a sudden shock to its economy or poor macroeconomic planning. A financial crisis will result in severe devaluation of the country's currency or a major depletion of the nation's foreign reserves. In return for the IMF's help, a country is usually required to embark on an IMF-monitored economic reform program, otherwise known as Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs).
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Bad news is often good news for investors these days, who have to perform mental gymnastics as the economic picture comes into focus. Traditionally negative indicators of a weaker economy such as rising unemployment or falling consumer spending tend to result in lower inflation, which likely means the Fed can take its foot off the gas with monetary tightening, which should mean less pressure to raise interest rates, which means potentially higher stock valuations.
We saw some of great examples of this last week.
First, the August Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) came up surprisingly short. There were a seasonally adjusted 10.1 million job openings at the end of August, down from 11.2 million a month earlier. That's the biggest month-over-month decline in job openings since the depths of COVID in April 2020. Facing higher interest rates and signs of a slowing economy, employers appear to be cutting back on their hiring plans.
We also saw weak US manufacturing data (the lowest reading since May 2020) which offered new evidence that economic growth and demand are slowing which on the surface is not normally a plus for stock markets. But you can follow the breadcrumbs from this data to a Fed that is showing signs of success in bringing inflation back under control and therefore may be more inclined to ease off the pace of its aggressive interest-rate hikes in the months ahead.
Investors didn't panic at these clear signs that the economy may be heading for trouble, instead they celebrated. The market, which was overdue for a rebound rally anyhow, ripped higher for two full days on Monday and Tuesday.
Bets on the Fed Funds rate getting to an upper band of 5% by the end of 2023 fell away, according to the CME FedWatch Tool. By Tuesday, futures markets were pointing to the 4% to 4.25% range as being the the most likely target.
Screens were flooded with green by Tuesday’s close after these two rather economically disappointing data releases. Sentiment were also bolstered by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), who surprised everyone when it raised the Australian version of the Fed Funds interest rate by a mere 0.25% when it had been widely expected to go with 0.50% or even 0.75%. Cue more hope that we may all be getting closer to peak interest rates for this hiking cycle.
Faced with this suddenly born-again idea that interest rates may not rise quite as fast or for as long as feared, the Fed got straight down to business pouring cold water on it, using its favorite weapon: dialed-up Fed-Speak. Chair Jerome Powell’s foot soldiers were blitzing the airwaves and roaring fire and brimstone from stages around the country, turning up the volume with the Fed’s highly-targeted messaging.
San Francisco Fed’s Mary Daly reiterated the Fed’s hawkish stance and the commitment to getting inflation down while strongly dismissing expectations of rate cuts in early to mid-2023. Atlanta Fed’s Raphael Bostic also dismissed the notion of rate cuts next year. Fed Governor Christopher Waller, a current voting member of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) that sets the interest rates, was pretty explicit when he said that"inflation is far from the FOMC's goal and not likely to fall quickly" while his fellow Governor Lisa Cook described inflation as “stubbornly persistent”. Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said the Fed was “quite a ways away" from pausing its campaign of interest-rate increases.
This all burst the market’s bubble and on Wednesday and Thursday we saw far more muted enthusiasm ahead of Friday’s important jobs report as investors were reminded of the old adage that fighting the Fed is usually not a great idea. What we eventually saw on Friday was yet another classic example of the “good news is bad news” effect. More mental gymnastics required.
Pre-market, we learned that the US economy had added yet another 263k jobs in September, over 50k down from the August increase of 315k, but still a further expansion of job creation and greater than anticipated. More importantly, the unemployment rate rather unexpectedly fell from 3.7% to 3.5%, a half-century low. In normal times, all pretty positive news for the economy.
However, the market quickly decided to interpret this as a sign that the job market is still strong enough for the Fed to feel the need to continue its aggressive inflation-fighting efforts through interest rate hikes. Stock prices fell hard across the board as we experienced yet another brutal Friday (an increasingly common feature over the last couple of months).
It wasn’t enough, however, to wipe out Monday and Tuesday’s spectacular gains and the major indexes closed broadly higher for the week for the first time in what feels like ages, although well off their highs from Tuesday evening.
The script for how this market misery ends is no mystery: Inflation peaks and quickly recedes, the economy slows meaningfully but doesn’t collapse, geopolitics improves and the corporate earnings outlook stays relatively stable - all of which gets the Fed to peak hawkishness and a pivot away from hiking interest rates (maybe even towards cutting them again). That’s it. That’s the simple recipe to end this bear market and all market participants know it.
This coming week is extremely important for figuring out where we are with this narrative as we get the latest inflation numbers (both retail Consumer Price Index CPI and the wholesale Producer Price Index PPI) and the Q3 earnings season gets under way (see THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR below).
Longer term investors, however, should not deviate from the plan of continuing to systematically buy index funds or certain factor-based ETFs on a regular basis (weekly, bi-weekly, 2x per month, monthly - whatever), indeed stepping up the amount they buy right now, if cash flow allows. I have no idea exactly when, but one day relatively soon you will be very, very glad you did.
OTHER NEWS
K-Krypto trouble .. Finance guruKim Kardashian will pay $1.25 million to settle regulatory charges that she failed to disclose the $250k she was paid to promote tokens of cryptocurrency Ethereum Max (EMAX) to investors on her Instagram account, the Securities and Exchange Commission - SEC (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) announced last week.
Her promotional post included a link to the EMAX website, which provided instructions for how to invest in EMAX, which fell 97% in value after her post first appeared. She agreed to give back the $250k and pay a $1 million penalty.
“This case is a reminder that, when celebrities or influencers endorse any investment opportunities, including crypto asset securities, it doesn’t mean those investment products are right for all investors,” SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said.
KK is the latest celebrity to face punishment for flouting investor-protection laws over getting mixed up with crypto bros and their promotional schemes. Boxing’s Floyd Mayweather, music industry’s Nick Carter (‘N Sync) and Soulja Boy and YouTuber Jake Paul all face similar or greater sanctions for allegedly fraudulent crypto involvement.
Please let it be over .. Like a bad smell, Elon Musk wafted back into our consciousness as he finally admitted defeat and agreed to buy Twitter (TWTR) by an October 28th deadline for the price to which he had originally committed, hopefully bringing this whole tiresome saga to an end.
Unsurprisingly, the news boosted the ailing TWTR stock price, but Tesla (TSLA) shareholders were not impressed that the company’s notoriously unfocused and erratic boss will now have a shiny new toy to play with and TSLA stock stumbled badly on the news. Out of the Jack Dorsey frying pan and into the Elon Musk fire. Gotta feel for those Twitter shareholders when it comes to who’s driving the train.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Regardless of the prevailing narrative, the main reason for the rally early last week was buyers’ recognition of an oversold condition and a ripe environment for BTFD activity with RSI readings below 30 as they were to start the week (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below). We have to keep in mind that Demand readings are only a week or so away from being at multi-year lows.
While every final market bottom starts with a meaningful bounce, only a tiny fraction of meaningful bounces are at market bottoms. The rest are just misleading traps and we just lived through a doozy of an example of one this past July and August.
While not impossible of course, a new bull market that began on October 3rd is still not a high-probability outcome, the burden of proof remains with the bulls to change that opinion.
Core long-term technical trends have not yet definitively reversed course. Longer term investors are advised to simply continue to just put money into the market on a cadence based on the calendar, not based on some gut feeling or the conflict-ridden advice of some transaction-compensated talking heads on CNBC who won’t think twice about you possibly incinerating your portfolio by doing what it is their Wall Street employers want you to do.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
Q3 earnings season kicks off this week with several big banks among those reporting. JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Pepsico, United Health, Walgreens and Delta Airlines are the headliners.
The main event is a really big deal .. the Bureau of Labor Statistics will report the Consumer Price Index (CPI) retail inflation report for September on Thursday. Headline CPI to expected be up 8.1% year over year and the Core CPI (ex-food and energy) to have climbed 6.5%. The wholesale version, the Producer Price Index (PPI) for September, comes out on Wednesday.
Markets will also be watching the release of minutes from the Fed's September meeting, the latest Retail Sales report and the University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Survey.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 24% (up from 20% the previous week)
→Neutral: 21% (up from 19% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 55% (down from 61% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 31 (Bearish by 41 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
(For context: The highest recorded percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5, 2009 near the end of the financial crisis bear market. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was 6% on August 21, 1987 not long before the stock market crash of October 1987).
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil and Chevron) for the second week in a row - up 13.7%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: American Tower and Prologis) - down 3.9%
The S&P 500 out-performed the NASDAQ-100
Emerging Markets slightly outperformed US Markets and International Developed Markets
Both Mid and Small Cap stocks beat Large Cap stocks
Value handsomely beat out Growth
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 145 and rose by 7 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 174 and fell by 4 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 38. SPY ended the week 24.0% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 36. QQQ ended the week 33.4% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:This week .. this amazing piece by Josh Brown about what has happened in America in the last three years rightfully went viral last week in finance-world and well beyond.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is an independent federal government regulatory agency responsible for protecting investors, maintaining fair and orderly functioning of the securities markets, and facilitating capital formation. It was created by Congress in 1934 as the first federal regulator of the securities markets. The SEC promotes full public disclosure, protects investors against fraudulent and manipulative practices in the market, and monitors corporate takeover actions in the United States. It also approves registration statements for bookrunners among underwriting firms.
Generally, issues of securities offered in interstate commerce, through the mail or on the Internet, must be registered with the SEC before they can be sold to investors. Financial services firms—such as broker-dealers, advisory firms and asset managers, as well as their professional representatives—must also register with the SEC to conduct business. An example: they would be responsible for approving any formal bitcoin exchange.
The SEC's primary function is to oversee organizations and individuals in the securities markets, including securities exchanges, brokerage firms, dealers, investment advisors, and investment funds. Through established securities rules and regulations, the SEC promotes disclosure and sharing of market-related information, fair dealing, and protection against fraud. It provides investors with access to registration statements, periodic financial reports, and other securities forms through its electronic data-gathering, analysis, and retrieval database, known as EDGAR.
The SEC is headed by five commissioners who are appointed by the president, one of whom is designated as chair. Each commissioner's term lasts five years, but they may serve for an additional 18 months until a replacement is found. The current SEC chair is Gary Gensler, who took office on April 17, 2021. To promote nonpartisanship, the law requires that no more than three of the five commissioners come from the same political party.
The SEC consists of five divisions and 23 offices. Their goals are to interpret and take enforcement actions on securities laws, issue new rules, provide oversight of securities institutions, and coordinate regulation among different levels of government.
The SEC is allowed to bring only civil actions, either in federal court or before an administrative judge. Criminal cases fall under the jurisdiction of law enforcement agencies within the Department of Justice; however, the SEC often works closely with such agencies to provide evidence and assist with court proceedings.
Among all the SEC's offices, the Office of the Whistleblower stands out as one of the most potent means of securities law enforcement. Created as a result of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the SEC's whistleblower program rewards eligible individuals for sharing original information that leads to successful law enforcement actions with monetary sanctions in excess of $1 million. The individuals can receive 10% to 30% of the total sanctions' proceeds.
SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
PLEASE MAKE A NOTE OF OUR NEW PHONE NUMBER TO CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
KEEP AN EYE OUT FOR THE MY INAUGURAL QUARTERLY MARKET REVIEW WHICH I WILL BE SENDING TO ALL SUBSCRIBERS IN THE NEXT DAY OR TWO, TAKING A DEEP DIVE AND LOOKING BACK OVER AN EVENTFUL (TO PUT IT MILDLY!) Q3 2022.
Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today to mourn the demise and end of the summer stock market rally which finally expired last week, as the entire set of gains since the June 16th prior lows were completely erased and new lows were made for 2022. The rally may have only had a short life of two and a half months, but it impacted the lives of millions of people during its time here on earth. It turned many investors into believers that the year of pain was finally ending, the bottom had been reached and the skies were clearing. However, it got exposed as just another cruel “bull trap”, just like the one we experienced in late March.
When the autopsy results came in, the cause of the rally’s death was determined to be Jerome Powell’s Jackson Hole speech on August 26th, Michael Myers-style inflation that will not die and the collapse of the giddy self-delusion of many investors who had convinced themselves that what they wanted to happen was what was going to happen.
At the beginning of August, with the rally under way, I posted this on Instagram ..
.. which unfortunately proved very prescient. Also, if you have been a regular reader of the UNDER THE HOOD part of this report you will have learned that there were plenty of technical deficiencies with the rally that made many skeptical of its sustainability.
The S&P 500 lost about 9% for the month of September, and the NASDAQ plunged 10.5%. For the third quarter, the S&P 500 fell 5%, and the NASDAQ declined 4%. (I will shortly be sending a Q3 market review as part of a new quarterly service to subscribers)
The UK’s central bank, the Bank of England (BOE), announced on Wednesday it would take action completely contrary to UK Treasury policy and start massive buying of the country’s government bonds in an attempt to check the frenzy afflicting UK bond and currency markets brought about by what is quickly becoming known as “The Trussterfck”, a stimulus plan announced by the UK’s new Prime Minister Liz Truss and her finance minister (“Kami-”)* Kwasi Kwarteng that basically stuck a middle finger up to financial markets and mainstream economic orthodoxy. For a few hours at least on Wednesday, it looked like it might have worked. Pressure on interest rates eased not only in the UK but around the world.
In the US, the interest rates for the benchmark 10-Year Treasury note, which had briefly climbed above 4% for the first time in more than a decade, quickly and dramatically slid back down on the back of the BOE announcement. By the end of the day, it was at 3.71%, that’s its steepest one-day drop since Lady Gaga drew our attention to her poker face in 2009. Bond yield moves like we saw in just one day last Wednesday in the US and the UK often take months to play out, but these aren't ordinary times.
Most stocks initially ripped higher as a result, although conspicuously absent from the sector leaderboard was Technology, which was held down partly by Apple (AAPL) after the company announced it is dropping plans to boost iPhone production due to disappointing demand.
The relief was temporary however (probably not helped by an absolute car crash of a media-round by PM Truss trying to justify her policy initiative) and by Thursday lunchtime, stock markets everywhere had given back all of Wednesday’s gains - and more - and interest rates were shooting higher again.
Markets found it easy to find more to get anxious about. The Federal Reserve's preferred inflation gauge came in hotter than expected. The Core Personal Consumption Expenditures price index (PCE), rose 0.6% in August, indicating that inflation is becoming more structural. The PCE doesn't have housing and rents as as a big component as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) does, so the fact that it is still rising is worrying and simply provides more cover for the Fed to continue to aggressively raise interest rates.
The situation in Ukraine deteriorated as Russia annexed eastern regions following sham “referenda”. The temperature was also raised by damage to the Nord Stream gas pipelines that NATO blamed on Russian sabotage and said that the attacks on European energy security could be met with a military response.
All of which raises the question; when does this all this s**t stop? I would say the answer is three-fold ..
A meaningfully softer CPI number. The next release is on October 13th. If CPI drops enough, that will signal disinflation is quickly taking hold and we could easily see a 5% or more rally in the stock market because it’d call into question the Fed’s damaging “dot plot” and likely result in a decline in the all-important expected Terminal Rate (what the Fed Funds rate will be at the time the Fed stops raising rates).
Better-than-expected earnings. Q3 earnings season begins in earnest on October 14th. Earnings concerns are pressuring stocks. If companies come out, like some did in Q2, and basically say business is holding up fine, that will go a long way to easing concerns about an imminent collapse in corporate earnings.
More dovish Fed speak. The Fed does have a history of “blinking” on rate hikes when economic data seems to justify a pause at least. If the rhetoric of Fed presidents and Powell’s press conferences start to focus on acknowledging the slowing economy and the relative success of their “shock and awe” policy of raising interest rates at such an extraordinary pace, then expectations for that Terminal Rate may begin to drift lower and that could result in a big relief rally that could possibly prove to be sustainable.
One little-noticed silver lining to what has been happening is the interest you can actually earn these days. Most portfolios have at least some bond exposure, which has been a problem on a price basis in 2022 as interest rates have rocketed. It is however worth reflecting on the fact that, one year ago, these were the approximate prevailing interest rates in various parts of the US fixed income market:
Short term government bonds: 0.3%
Corporate bonds: 2.3%
High Yield Savings Accounts: 0.30%
High yield bonds: 4.4%
Here are those approximate yields today:
Short term government bonds: 4.4%
Corporate bonds: 5.6%
High Yield Savings Accounts: 2.30%
High yield bonds: 8.0%
Keep your chin up and make absolutely sure you read the ARTICLE OF THE WEEK below for more about why this is actually a much better environment for regular ongoing investors than the one we were in this time last year when it seemed that we were seeing new market highs almost every other day.
OTHER NEWS (REAL ESTATE EDITION):
Buyers and sellers alike seem to be souring on the real estate environment .. Government data on new-home sales in August released last week came in surprisingly high at 685k, crushing the 495k expectation. However, it’s still way down from the peak rates of more than a million new home sales in summer 2020 and 800k in summer 2021.
On the affordability side, prices are still soaring but at a rapidly diminishing rate. Data released last week showed July’s average prices nationally up 15.8% from a year earlier. But that was well down from June’s 18.1% annual gain. Indeed, that month-on-month fall in the rate was the largest deceleration in the history of the index.
Anecdotal evidence abounds of listing agents sitting around twiddling their thumbs at what is normally a very busy time when traditionally lots of sellers throw properties on the market ahead of the winter slowdown. People are just sitting on their already-refinanced 2.8% mortgages and have little interest in replacing them with 6.8% ones by selling and re-buying.
Buyers are pulling the brake too. Even leaving aside for a moment the sky-high prices still being asked by sellers who are still mentally anchored to 2021 and the doubling of mortgage rates in a matter of months that is crippling first-time buyers, many potential buyers who can afford to purchase are worried about being that dope that pays the market high and then watches prices fall 20% right after the closing. It’s easier to just hang out for a while and see what happens. Mortgage application volume dropped 3.7% last month alone.
This idea of the real estate market basically seizing up is supported by data released last week showing downgraded expectations of a total of 5.19 million existing home sales in 2022, that’s over 15% down from 2021’s number. And 2023 sales are expected to slump further to 4.82 million, which would be the lowest annual count since 2012.
UNDER THE HOOD:
During bear markets, investors should not look to the stocks displaying relative strength for leadership. Those stocks are the leaders of bull markets. On the contrary, for leadership in a bear market, investors should look at what is going on with the very weakest stocks. After all, many of these stocks were the first to peak back in the day, foreshadowing the coming overall market decline. The seeds of the 2022 decline were planted way back in February 2021 when smaller stocks began to roll over but few noticed as the headline indexes just kept moving constantly higher for months.
These weak stocks can currently be found among the Percent of Stocks 30% or More Below Their One Year Highs. Ahead of a real, lasting market turnaround situation this number should be declining sharply towards single digits as these stocks start their journey upwards. Unfortunately for the bulls, this number soared to over 57% last week, its highest level since May 2020! This portion of the market theoretically has the very best valuations, but buyers are just not interested.
Another discouraging fact for the bulls is that the total trading volume was above average, and often significantly above average, on the big down-days, showing much greater conviction on the part of the sellers than the buyers.
Evidence of true exhaustion or capitulation on the part of the sellers remains elusive. More than that, signs of the return of Demand robust enough to sustain a new bull market are likewise absent.
“Oversold” (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK)? So what? Without Demand explosion, it’s just an adjective with no meaning or consequence.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
It's the calm before the storm of the Q3 earnings season, which ramps up in mid-October. By far the main event on the economic calendar next week is the September jobs report on Friday. Economists expect to see a gain of 250k jobs, down from the 315k gain in August. The unemployment rate is forecast to hold steady at 3.7%.
Other economic data out next week includes Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' index followed by the Services equivalent the next day. The August Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) comes out this week, cue another tedious avalanche of simplistic articles pointing out how there’s like 1.8 jobs per unemployed worker or whatever it is. Zzzzzz.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 20% (up from 18% the previous week)
→Neutral: 19% (down from 21% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 61% (unchanged from 61% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 41 (Bearish by 43 the previous week)
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
(For context: The highest ever percentage of AAII bearish sentiment was 70% and occurred on March 5, 2009 near the end of the financial crisis bear market. The lowest percentage of AAII bears was 6% on August 21, 1987 shortly before the stock market crash of October 1987).
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil and Chevron) - up 2.2%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy and Southern Company) - down 8.7%
The S&P 500 and the NASDAQ-100 declined in equal measure
Emerging Markets and US Markets fell further than International Developed markets
Large Cap stocks fell much further than both Mid and Small Cap
Very little to separate last week’s performance of Value and Growth
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 138 and fell by 1 point last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 178 and rose by 4 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 28. SPY ended the week 25.1% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 29. QQQ ended the week 33.8% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. “All of the value creation for investors comes from the actions they take in falling markets, not rising ones”.Required reading for anyone under 55 and who has money in the stock market from Josh Brown.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
OVERSOLD
The completely subjective term oversold refers to a condition where an asset has traded lower in price and has the potential for a price bounce. An oversold condition can last for a long time, and therefore being oversold doesn't mean a price rally will come soon, or at all. Many technical indicators identify oversold and overbought levels. These indicators base their assessment on where the price is currently trading relative to prior prices. Fundamentals can also be used to assess whether an asset is potentially oversold and has deviated from its typical value metrics.
Oversold to a fundamental trader means an asset it trading well below its typical value metrics. Technical analysts are typically referring to an indicator reading when they mention oversold. Both are valid approaches, although the two groups are using different tools to determine whether an asset is oversold.
Fundamentally oversold stocks (or any asset) are those that investors feel are trading below their true value. This could be the result of bad news regarding the company in question, a poor outlook for the company going forward, an out of favor industry, or a sagging overall market.
Traditionally, a common indicator of a stock’s value has been the P/E ratio. Analysts and traders use publicly reported financial results or earnings estimates to identify the appropriate price for a particular stock. If a stock’s P/E dips to the bottom of its historic range, or falls below the average P/E of the sector, investors may see the stock as undervalued. This may present a buying opportunity for long-term investing.
Traders can also use technical indicators to establish oversold levels. A technical indicator only looks at the current price relative to prior prices. It does not take into account fundamental data.
George Lane’s stochastic oscillator, which he developed in the 1950s, examines recent price movements to identify changes in a stock’s momentum and price direction. The RSI measures the power behind price movements over a recent period, typically 14 days.
A low RSI, generally below 30, signals traders that a stock may be oversold. Essentially the indicator is saying that the price is trading in the lower third of its recent price range.
This isn't to say the price will bounce immediately. Many traders wait for the indicator to start heading higher before buying since oversold conditions can last a long time. For example, a trader may wait for the oversold RSI to move back above 30 before buying. This shows that the price was oversold but is now starting to rise.
If oversold is when an asset is trading in the lower portion of its recent price range or is trading near lows based on fundamental data, then overbought is the opposite. An overbought technical indicator reading appears when the price of an asset is trading in the upper portion of its recent price range. Similarly, an overbought fundamental reading appears when the asset is trading at the high end of its fundamental ratios. This doesn't mean the asset should be sold. It is just an alert to look into what is going on.
Oversold is mistakenly viewed by some traders as a buy signal. Instead, it is more of an alert. It lets traders know that an asset is trading in the lower portion of its recent price range, or is trading at a lower fundamental ratio than it typically does. This doesn't mean the asset should be bought. Many stocks that continue to fall look cheap all the way down. This can happen because most oversold readings are based on past performance. If investors see a grim future for a stock or other asset, it may continue to be sold off even though it looks cheap based on historical standards.
SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
PLEASE MAKE A NOTE OF OUR NEW PHONE NUMBER TO CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
For years, corporate America and stock market investors could rely on the Federal Reserve to have their back. Ridiculously low borrowing costs turbo-charged stock prices - especially those of profitless (and sometimes mindless) tech companies. The Fed’s interests were aligned with those of the likes of Apple, Tesla and Microsoft but also with those of regular people pouring money in their 401k every two weeks. The Fed’s extended purchases of mortgage bonds drove up home prices, delighting homeowners.
Everyone was a winner. Well, everyone except would-be first time home buyers who watched prices soar out of their reach and savers and those living on fixed income investments for whom income dried to up pretty much zero.
A whole generation of stock market participants learned to reduce their investment time horizon from decades to hours. Others learned to sink money into all sorts of nonsense and some even made a quick buck out of it for a while. This was all brought about by the orgy of easy money that the Fed created.
But Lucy has now pulled the football. The stock market’s ex-sugar-daddy has deleted and blocked its phone number. The Fed’s job has never been to prop up the stock market, it just so happened that, for a good while there, the interests of the two were joined at the hip. But not any more. The cavalry ain’t coming this time.
Markets were due for a relief bounce following the steep declines of the past couple of weeks, and that started happening on Monday as there were some light positives from corporate earnings and guidance (Ralph Lauren, RL), while old school BTFD’ers and short-covering helped all the broad indexes rally coming into Fed Decision Day.
However the announcement, when it arrived on Wednesday afternoon, of the 0.75% increase in the Fed Funds rate and particularly the tone of Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s subsequent press conference, confirmed that the Fed continues to be wedded to an extremely hawkish stance and it was reiterated yet again (just in case there’s anyone left for whom this hasn’t sunk in yet) that, even if we have indeed already seen peak inflation (far from certain) and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) readings do start to trend lower from here, that is not even close to what the Fed needs to see in order to change its monetary policy. They will require multiple months of consistently falling inflation and their 2% target CPI rate appearing realistic before they will ease up on their current stance.
Most of us heard nothing really new or surprising here, but some people need to be told things over and over before they finally absorb it - especially when what they are being told directly conflicts with what they yearn for (ie., an end to all this bearish, risk-off environment and a return to a nice, easy steadily rising stock market).
Fed officials did out-hawk us all, however, with their frankly quite astoundingly front-loaded expectations of what comes next in their Summary of Economic Projections (the so-called Dot Plot). The median forecast within the Fed is for the Fed Funds rate to rise to 4.4% by the end of this year, then up to 4.6% early in 2023 with some members of the committee thinking quite a bit higher. As recently as June, those median numbers had been respectively 3.8% and 3.4%.
If accurate, these latest projections would mean a total of still another one and a half percentage points of rate increases from here. That puts a fourth-straight 0.75% hike very much on the table for the next meeting in November (just six days before the US midterm elections) and then maybe even extending the streak to five in the one after that in December.
The market’s expectation for the Terminal Rate (the Fed Funds rate at the time the Fed stops raising rates) is now about 4.62% and rising.
After initially meandering higher following the announcement (perhaps based upon an element of relief that the hike was not a full percentage point), markets turned sour and spent the last part of Wednesday falling hard.
The scenario of a no-recession outcome to what we are seeing is becoming less and less likely and the growling bears immediately turned their eyes hungrily on the 2022 S&P 500 lows of June 16th (SPX 3,666) as their next destination. By the end of yet another brutal Friday session to close the week, we were almost there (SPX 3,693).
Investors will now turn their attention to the Q3 earnings season next month (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) and it could be tough for stocks. A bleak warning last week from Ford Motor (F) about its upcoming earnings built on the previous week's dismal commentary from FedEx (FDX).
The major indexes have still not yet priced in a material economic slowdown in the US and/or a really bad Q3 earnings season. If these both come to pass in a substantial way, the stock market could easily sink a lot further and still not be at a compelling value. Remember, however, that neither scenario is a given and it could be that both are avoided, but these are the factors that need to be top of mind for investors in the coming weeks. Keep an eye on them (or let me do it for you and just read/listen to my report each week).
To end on a slightly more positive note, while the last few weeks have been undoubtedly painful, much of the baseless, naive hopes of a quick resolution to all of the economy’s issues and imminent falling interest rates have now been been tossed into the garbage and we may possibly be back to having a stock market that is more sensibly and accurately priced.
OTHER NEWS:
The newest emerging market? .. The United Kingdom is now essentially being treated by financial markets (and ex-Treasury Secretary Larry Summers) as an emerging market, in the same category as Vietnam, the Philippines, South Africa or Chile, which are viewed as not having the same degree of reliable, disciplined institutions setting economic policy as more developed economies such as those in North America, most of Western Europe/Scandinavia and Australasia.
This comes after new UK prime minister Liz Truss and her new finance minister Kwasi Kwarteng introduced a mind-bending package of tax cuts, unfunded state aid and colossal increased borrowing. They claim it is intended to stimulate growth, but it clearly risks turbo-charging already out-of-control inflation and increasing the odds of a very nasty and prolonged recession. It’s a massive gamble of the part of the new government that is likely only two years out from a general election. Even the independent central bank, the Bank of England appeared shocked.
Financial markets hated the plan, viewing it as a reckless, vote-seeking set of gimmicks that put the country in economic peril. Their punishment was swift and severe, the UK currency immediately plunged to its lowest level against the US Dollar since 1985 and the benchmark five-year interest rate exploded upwards for its largest one-day increase in its history.
The problem for US investors is that the UK constitutes a relatively large component holding in exchange-traded funds and mutual funds focused on so-called developed international markets. These are very common among, for example, many 401k fund allocations.
Global phenomenon .. It’s not just the US that is busy raising rates. Just last week alone, the central banks of the UK, Switzerland, Sweden, Norway, South Africa and Indonesia all did the same. Japan did not raise rates but did announce central bank intervention in foreign exchange markets to support the yen. The last time that happened, Will Smith was getting jiggy with it in 1998.
Fewer jobs at the big guys .. Meta/Facebook is reportedly cutting staff in a push to reduce costs. the company is looking to cut costs by at least 10% while rival Google is requiring some existing employees to apply for new jobs. Walmart plans to hire fewer workers than last year as it prepares for the holiday season amid a slowing economy. Walmart plans to add 40,000 workers in seasonal and full-time roles compared to 150,000 hires last year.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Market action since the release of the CPI numbers on September 13th has mostly reflected a renewed urgency among sellers. Perhaps more importantly, this urgency to sell stocks has been accelerating.
During long-term market downtrends, it is especially easy to be seduced by the idea that simple counter-trend rallies are something more meaningful. However, as history has demonstrated, these moves against the dominant downtrend are normal. No market trend, up or down, continues in a straight line. Therefore, it is critical to be really, really wary of moves against the dominant trend during bear markets. Many investors learned that lesson the hard way over the summer.
Investors should remain aware that the probabilities still favor further downside moves on an intermediate-term basis and whether or not yet another over-sold rally develops in the short-term is frankly of very little importance in the current market atmosphere.
I prefer to let the data speak because we cannot know what the Fed is thinking, or where inflation is heading. If the bulls need a straw to clutch at, the current lack of restraint being shown by sellers could just possibly lead to the beginning of the explosive orgy of selling that can sometimes cause the long-awaited exhaustion of supply that can coincide with major market turnarounds - but only if it is accompanied by a concurrent and equally passionate level of Demand and there is absolutely no sign of that right now.
The body of evidence strongly suggests that the downtrend remains comfortably intact.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
It will be a relatively quiet week, before the storm of third-quarter earnings season picks up in mid-October. A handful of stragglers like Nike, Paychex, Micron and CarMax will report earnings next week as the Q2 earnings season draws to a close.
The biggest piece of economic data out next week is the Personal Income and Expenditures Report for August, which will include the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index. The Core version of this is the Fed’s favorite measure of how their battle with inflation is going.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 18% (down from 26% the previous week)
→Neutral: 21% (down from 28% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 61% (up from 46% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 43 (Bearish by 35 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color from finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Coca-Cola) for the second week in a row - down 1.3%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple and Microsoft) for the second week in a row - down 19.9%
Last week’s ugliness hit the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ-100 pretty much equally
International Developed Markets fared the worst last week ahead of US Markets and Emerging Markets
Large Cap stocks fell slightly less than both Mid and Small Cap
Value performed a little worse than Growth
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 139 and fell by 12 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 174 and rose by 12 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 32. SPY ended the week 22.9% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 32. QQQ ended the week 31.8% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. Personal finance and investing is filled with false myths, truisms, damaging mental short cuts, self-delusion and more. Some of the most dangerous phrases in the world of personal finance that financial planners hear from prospects and clients over and over again are outlined here.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
QUARTERLY EARNINGS REPORTS
A quarterly earnings report is a quarterly filing made by public companies to report their performance. Earnings reports include items such as net income, earnings per share, earnings from continuing operations, and net sales. By analyzing quarterly earnings reports, investors can begin to gauge the financial health of the company and determine whether it deserves their investment.
Fundamental analysts believe that good investments are identified with hard work in the form of ratio and performance analysis. Particular attention is paid to the trend in ratios gleaned from the quarterly earnings reports over time, rather than solely the single data point from each report. One of the most anticipated numbers for analysis is earnings per share because it provides an indication of how much the company earned for its shareholders.
Quarterly earnings reports generally provide a quarterly update of all three financial statements, including the income statement, the balance sheet, and the cash flow statement. Every quarterly earnings report provides investors with three things: an overview of sales, expenses, and net income for the most recent quarter. It may also provide a comparison to the previous year, and possibly to the previous quarter. Some quarterly earnings reports include a brief summary and analysis from the CEO or company spokesman, as well as a summary of previous quarterly earnings results.
The quarterly earnings report is generally backed up by the company's Form 10-Q, a legal document that must be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission every quarter. The 10-Q is more comprehensive in nature and provides additional details behind the quarterly earnings report. The exact date and time of the quarterly earnings report announcement are obtainable by contacting a company's investor relations department. The 10-Q is usually published a few weeks after the quarterly earnings report.
Every quarter, analysts and investors wait for the announcement of company earnings. The announcement of earnings for a stock, particularly for well followed large capitalization stocks, can move the market. Stock prices can fluctuate wildly on days when the quarterly earnings report is released.
For better or worse, a company's ability to beat earnings estimates projected by analysts or the firm itself is more important than the company's ability to grow earnings over the prior year. For example, if the company reports earnings growth from the prior period in its quarterly earnings report, but fails to meet or exceed the estimates published before the release, it may result in a sell-off of the stock.
In many ways, analyst estimates are just as important as the earnings report itself. In capital markets, it is all about market expectations since expectations are reflected in stock prices already based on the efficiency theory. This is why any variance from the included expectations in the stock price impact the price up or down.
SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
PLEASE MAKE A NOTE OF OUR NEW PHONE NUMBER TO CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Monday was mostly just about positioning going into the next day’s inflation print (although the surprisingly effective counter-attack by Ukrainian forces also came into play somewhat). A narrative slowly built throughout the day that maybe future inflation might not be as elevated or persistent as was previously feared and that we might expect to see an appetizing Consumer Price Index (CPI) number, boosted by the fact that three-years-ahead inflationary expectations dropped to 2.8%, the lowest since early 2021, in advance of Tuesday’s release of the latest data.
And then BOOM! The CPI announcement came out and it proved to be a massive blow to hopes of 1) imminent lower inflation, and 2) reducing the pressure on the Fed to keep hiking interest rates.
Overall consumer prices returned to their habit of moving higher again month-to-month rising 0.1% in August, after dropping to a zero increase in July and are up 8.3% over the past year. That compares to the 8.5% year-over-year figure reported in July but was higher than the expected 8.1% increase.
Food prices increased 11.4% from a year ago, in the largest twelve-month increase since Rod Stewart asked us to let him know if we liked his body and thought he was sexy in 1979. However, the report noted the food price increase was largely offset by a 10.6% decline in gas prices. The big problem was that Core inflation, which strips out those volatile food and energy prices, rose 0.6% last month, double July's 0.3% pace. Compared to a year ago, August Core inflation is higher by a staggering 6.3% compared to 5.9% in July. The high Core reading was particularly disturbing as it indicated a wide distribution of inflation throughout the economy and not just in food and energy.
The market showed no mercy in response. The recent rally was completely unwound and exposed as having been founded more on investor hopes than realistic assessments, which generally sums up a recent period of self-delusion by many market participants and pundits. No sector was spared in the ensuing bloodbath and we saw the worst single day for the stock market since the early weeks of the pandemic panic in 2020, with tech stocks whacked by far the hardest. Gold, oil and crypto got punched in the face as well. The only things that moved higher were market interest rates (up to very close to 4.0% in the benchmark 2 Year Treasury), the US Dollar and investor stress levels.
As the market licked its wounds on Wednesday, attention turned to CPI’s wholesale cousin, the Producer Price Index (PPI) which measures the inflation rate of raw materials.
When it came out, the PPI number slightly softened the blow of the CPI print, falling 0.1% in August. The headline annualized rate in August was 8.7%, almost a full percent lower than July’s rate and a little lower than analyst expectations. This was, of course, mostly driven by falling energy prices over the last month or two.
The market felt like it had dodged a bullet as the PPI failed to confirm the worst of the bad CPI news and stock prices stabilized for a while, helped by news that a possible US rail strike, that would have severely damaged domestic supply chains, had been averted and that the Chengdu lockdown was being eased in China.
But the broad decline resumed on Thursday and accelerated into Friday as investors seemed to decide they just weren’t comfortable owning risk assets in the current environment and the realization set in that virtually none of the conditions required to have the Fed back off its current hawkish stance have been met.
Things weren’t helped by FedEx (FDX), sometimes viewed as a barometer for the economy in general, who released an atrocious earnings report that cited huge and rapidly-worsening macro-economic deterioration as the reason and the CEO warned of an imminent “worldwide recession”.
The stock was punished, suffering its worst single day in history, plummeting more than 20% in a matter of hours. By the time the bell rang on Friday afternoon, mercifully bringing the week’s proceedings to a close, the S&P 500 had lost more than 4.0% since Monday morning, while the Nasdaq had tumbled 5.5%.
In last week’s report I highlighted the importance of the expectations for the Terminal Rate (the level at which the Fed stops raising rates) and, following the hot CPI number, the average market expectation has now shifted up from a midpoint of around 4.0% to above 4.4%, with the odds that the Terminal Rate will be above 4% now standing at 93%.
Any lingering hopes of less than a 0.75% increase in Fed Funds rate this week have now completely evaporated. Indeed, markets are even pricing in a non-trivial probability of a full percentage point increase on Wednesday.
The bottom line is this: stocks rallied off the early September lows on the hope of a quick decline in inflation and seeing as that idea is now in ruins, the S&P 500 is right back at those lows again. Looking forward to this week’s Fed interest rate decision, it’s the market expectations of the Terminal Rate that will be the key variable that likely will decide if the S&P 500 breaks down towards a test of the June 16th lows or embarks on yet another relief rally.
OTHER NEWS:
6% ceiling shattered .. The average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK) hit 6.02% last week, up from 5.89% the previous week and 2.86% a year ago, according to a survey of lenders by Freddie Mac. The last time rates were this high was in the heart of the financial crisis almost fourteen years ago, when the U.S. was in a deep recession. The jump is one of the most obvious and hard-hitting effects of the Fed’s relentless campaign to curb inflation by lifting the cost of borrowing for consumers and businesses, slowing what was a red-hot housing market not so long ago.
Elon vs. Twitter .. Beaten-down Twitter (TWTR) shareholders overwhelmingly voted to stay strong on Tuesday and hold Elon Musk’s feet to the fire to enforce his commitment to buy the company. The billionaire continues his wiggling gymnastics to try to back out of the deal he made supposedly based partly on questions about a lot of fake “bot” accounts (wow, who knew??) and supposedly partly on the testimony of former Twitter security chief Peiter “Mudge” Zatko whose testimony has been described by his former employer as being “riddled with provable inaccuracies”. TWTR stock was almost unique on Tuesday as it actually ended the day higher on news of the vote although, like almost everything else, it ended up down for the week as a whole.
UNDER THE HOOD:
In looking at the recent market rallies, I have previously emphasized in this report how the lopsided heavy retreat in Supply relative to the rather timid expansion in Demand is typical of market advances that find it hard to sustain themselves and extremely untypical of enduring rallies off the bottom. They are also susceptible to collapsing upon themselves as soon as things get tough.
And so it proved as buyers showed themselves to be fearful wimps as the disturbing inflation news broke and a monumental withdrawal of Demand took place. It didn’t even need a huge increase in Supply to push markets right back where they had come from but as the week went on, that Supply level grew stronger anyhow.
In a market so weighted towards the tech sector, the complete rout of those stocks last week rippled brutally throughout the entire universe of US stocks as a whole.
Committed buyers need to pick themselves up, dust themselves down and start answering the call in a major way if this downtrend is going to be reversed. Longer term indicators need to stay above their levels from September 6th because if they don’t, then the likelihood that stock prices break down through the June 16th lows is magnified many times over.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
All eyes will be on the Federal Reserve next week, the Federal Open Market Committee's two-day meeting takes place on Tuesday and Wednesday to consider the extent of further interest rate rises. Futures pricing suggests the greatest odds of a third-straight rate hike of 0.75%, but a full 1% is not ruled out.
The Bank of Japan also announces a monetary policy decision this week. There's no change in interest rates expected there.
A smattering of major companies will report earnings this week, including Costco, AutoZone, Accenture, General Mills, Lennar and Darden Restaurants.
Economic data out next week will feature several indicators of the health of the U.S. housing market. There’s the release of the housing market index for September, housing starts for August and existing home sales for August.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 26% (up from 18% the previous week)
→Neutral: 28% (down from 29% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 46% (down from 53% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 20 (Bearish by 35 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Coca-Cola) - down 0.6%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple and Microsoft) - down 18.5%
The NASDAQ-100 fell harder than the S&P 500
US Markets fell further than International Developed Markets and Emerging Markets
Mid Cap stocks fell slightly less than both Large and Small Cap
Growth performed worse than Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 151 and fell by 18 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 162 and rose by 13 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is now back below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 35. SPY ended the week 19.3% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is now back below its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 33. QQQ ended the week 28.4% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. A deep dive and full explainer of what we know so far about the recent federal student loan forgiveness program.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
FIXED RATE MORTGAGE
The term “fixed-rate mortgage” refers to a home loan that has a fixed interest rate for the entire term of the loan. This means that the mortgage carries a constant interest rate from beginning to end. Fixed-rate mortgages are popular products for consumers who want to know how much they’ll pay every month.
Several kinds of mortgage products are available on the market, but they boil down to two basic categories: variable-rate loans and fixed-rate loans. With variable-rate loans, the interest rate is set above a certain benchmark and then fluctuates—changing at certain periods.
Fixed-rate mortgages, on the other hand, carry the same interest rate throughout the entire length of the loan. Unlike variable- and adjustable-rate mortgages, fixed-rate mortgages don’t fluctuate with the market. So the interest rate in a fixed-rate mortgage stays the same regardless of where interest rates go—up or down.
Adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) are something of a hybrid between fixed- and variable-rate loans. An initial interest rate is fixed for a period of time, usually several years. After that, the interest rate resets periodically, at annual or even monthly intervals.
Most mortgagors who purchase a home for the long term end up locking in an interest rate with a fixed-rate mortgage. They prefer these mortgage products because they’re more predictable. In short, borrowers know how much they’ll be expected to pay each month, so there are no surprises.
The mortgage term is basically the life span of the loan—that is, how long you have to make payments on it. In the United States, terms can range anywhere from 10 to 30 years for fixed-rate mortgages; 10, 15, 20, and 30 years are the usual increments. Of all the term options, the most popular is 30 years, followed by 15 years.
The actual amount of interest that borrowers pay with fixed-rate mortgages varies based on how long the loan is amortized (that is, how long the payments are spread out for). While the interest rate on the mortgage and the amounts of the monthly payments themselves don’t change, the way that your money is applied does. Mortgagors pay more toward interest in the initial stages of repayment; later on, their payments are going more into the loan principal.
So, the mortgage term comes into play when calculating mortgage costs. The basic rule of thumb: The longer the term, the more interest that you pay over the life of the loan but the lower your monthly payments. Someone with a 15-year term, for example, will pay less in interest than someone with a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, but their monthly payments will be higher.
SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
PLEASE MAKE A NOTE OF OUR NEW PHONE NUMBER TO CALL OR TEXT: (929) 677 6774
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
A holiday-shortened week began uneventfully with little of interest coming over the newswires and markets simply drifted along the path of least resistance, which is currently downwards.
Things soon began to pick up steam to the downside though, as the Chinese city of Chengdu extended COVID lockdowns for the majority of its 21 million residents due to rising infection numbers, dimming the demand outlook for oil and sending the price of crude oil and stocks lower. Then a new report from the Institute for Supply Management showed unexpected US growth in the services sector from a month ago. New orders and business activity actually accelerated from a month previous. Hardly evidence of an economic slowdown. Chalk up yet another justification for the Fed’s program of aggressive interest rate rises and the market’s sinking feeling grew stronger.
Fed chair Jerome Powell then notably failed to walk back his previously extremely hawkish comments in a speech he gave on Thursday where he made it clear (yet again!) that the central bank is thoroughly committed to tackling inflation and staying aggressive until it falls back to its 2% target.
Powell's appearance followed the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB, see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK, below) to raise interest rates in the EuroZone by 0.75% on Thursday. The ECB's target rate is now above zero for the first time since Kelly Clarkson came out with the rather dubious assertion in 2012 that anything that doesn’t kill you somehow actually makes you stronger. The ECB’s rate hike (following a 0.50% increase as recently as July) was the biggest increase since Britney invited her baby to hit her one more time in the early days of Europe’s monetary union in 1999.
The bank is moving aggressively to combat record levels of inflation even as an energy crisis puts Europe on the brink of recession and the bank made it clear that rate rises would not stop there. The death of Queen Elizabeth II, while sad, had little effect on markets although trading activity may slow in the UK with an official period of mourning and likely upcoming additional national holidays for the funeral and Charles III’s coronation.
Nothing chair Powell said dampened the expectations of a 0.75% rise in interest rates at the next Fed meeting on September 21st, with markets pricing that probability at 84%. The size of the rate increase and its frequency over the coming weeks and months is The Journey.
It is, however, important to keep in mind that the more important variable here is not The Journey, but The Destination. This is the Terminal Rate when it comes to interest rates. That is to say; at what level and when the Fed will stop hiking rates.
The Journey by which the Fed reaches The Destination is less important than exactly where that final destination ends up being. Market expectation for the Terminal Rate is currently a little over 4.0% by March 2023 and keeping an eye on how this number moves up or down is probably more important than analyzing the s**t out of a single rise of half or three-quarters of a percent in September, which is simply a milestone on the way to The Destination.
After taking an initial dive at Powell’s comments, the market then decided that, actually, there was nothing new here and prices stabilized quickly. An over-sold bounce was always going to happen after a miserable three weeks and investors were just looking for a catalyst.
Fed-Speak, for once, was a bit more more dovish than hawkish and it was this that provided the needed spark for that inevitable oversold bounce. In a speech, deputy chair Lael Brainard seemed to make a deliberate point of noting the risks involved in raising rates too quickly as well as too slowly and highlighted recent progress indicating that the rising rate of inflation may have topped.
Indeed, if Powell hadn’t explicitly ruled it out a week earlier, her speech would have given hope to those who used to believe in a Fed pivot back to lower rates sometime soon, but it was enough to trigger an over-sold bounce that lasted right the way through to Friday’s close, leaving markets meaningfully higher for the shorter week (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS, below), essentially erasing the previous week’s steep losses.
OTHER NEWS:
Natural gas trouble (part 2) .. Natural gas prices surged 36% in Europe in a day after Russia announced it was halting the flow through its Nordstream gas pipeline. European natural gas prices are now up over 400% from a year ago.
Russia said its main gas supply pipelines would remain closed indefinitely, fueling fears of gas rationing in the European Union this winter. Russia said the shutdown was due to “technical reasons,” but European officials accused Russia of weaponizing energy prices in retaliation for sanctions imposed following its invasion of Ukraine. The Nordstream pipeline has typically supplied Europe with about a third of the gas imported to continental Europe from Russia.
Travel boom .. In another sign of the airline industry's recovery from its COVID-related slump, the number of Labor Day weekend air travelers in the U.S. surpassed pre-pandemic levels for the first time. The Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) reported that it had screened 8.76 million passengers between Friday September 2nd and Monday September 5th. That was 102% of the volume recorded during the 2019 holiday. Friday was the busiest travel day, with 2.48 million people screened.
Despite the increased number of fliers, just 0.6% of the more than 90,000 flights scheduled on U.S. airlines were canceled and only 16% were delayed.
Turbulence at BBBY .. Gustavo Arnal, the CFO of Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) who leapt to his death from a Manhattan skyscraper (ruled a suicide by the New York City medical examiner), had faced a “pump and dump” allegation less than two weeks earlier, it was reported last week.
Arnal’s death marks the latest chapter in a turbulent period for the troubled home goods retailer and meme stock phenomenon. BBBY stock skyrocketedearlier this year based on the usual manic meme stock phenomena but was brought crashing down to earth last month after activist investor and GameStop (GME) chairman Ryan Cohen disclosed he was selling a large stake in the company. A lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia alleges that both Arnal and Cohen were engaged in a pump and dump scheme involving BBBY stock.
Frozen Apple .. Never mind better battery life or a fancier camera, the biggest innovation from the latest product launch from Apple (AAPL) was a price freeze. It says a lot about the state of the economy that the consumer electronics company famous for its talent at extracting cash from its loyal customers is choosing not to raise prices, holding the cost of its iPhone 14 range at the same level as its predecessor. Holding prices steady while inflation ramps up its costs looks like a valuable goodwill gesture, but it actually removes one reason for not upgrading handsets as the company seeks to protect its $200 billion franchise.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Last Thursday’s reflex rally sprung from deeply over-sold short term conditions, pushed Buying Power into a dominant position over Selling Pressure (see below) and provided welcome relief from the relentless selling since the August 16th high. The rally was, however, entirely predictable as a reaction to the levels to which prices had so quickly fallen.
Unfortunately, a return to below-average trading volumes on both of last week’s up-days left the conviction of the buyers in question. Smaller defensive sectors are leading the bounce (I’m looking at you, Utilities and Materials) and Small Cap stocks are lagging, and all on low volume.
That is the exact opposite of what we would expect to see in a legitimate, sustainable risk-on uptrend. It is, however, exactly what you would expect to see in a rally driven mostly by opportunistic investors buying simply because overall prices had fallen so far and so fast and with the probable intention of dumping their purchases once they turn meaningfully profitable - rather than because of a high degree of conviction that the skies have finally cleared and it’s time to back up the truck and load up on stocks.
Trends in other core technical indicators have now fallen back from their recent brief recoveries and sit once again below their respective moving averages, making it more difficult to view Thursday and Friday’s rebound as a lasting advance.
What is likely needed for a sustainable return to a bull market is selling exhaustion in a crescendo of supply or spectacular demand reinvigoration among buyers in a high-volume environment, preferably all happening at about the same time. None of these scenarios are even close to being in place at this point.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
This coming week is all about the latest inflation data, with potentially massive implications for Federal Reserve policy and the economy in general. The retail Consumer Price Index (CPI) for August comes out on Tuesday and the average economist estimate is for the index to be up 8.1% from a year earlier, slowing from July's 8.5% annual rate of increase. The Core CPI, which excludes food and energy, is expected to accelerate to 6.1% year over year however, up from 5.9% in July.
Wednesday will see the release the August Producer Price Index (PPI),the wholesale version of CPI, which is forecast to have risen 8.9% from a year earlier.
Other economic data to be released next week includes August Retail Sales and a pair of sentiment indicators: The National Federation of Independent Businesses' Small Business Optimism Index and the University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Index.
A handful of companies will report earnings and host investor days, including Oracle, Adobe, Starbucks and Humana. A shareholder meeting at Twitter on Tuesday will vote on Musk's proposed $44 billion acquisition.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 18% (down from 22% the previous week)
→Neutral: 29% (up from 28% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 53% (up from 50% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 35 (Bearish by 28 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Sherwin-Williams) - up 5.0%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Coca-Cola) - up 0.6%
The NASDAQ-100 pretty much exactly tracked the progress of the S&P 500
US Markets rose by more than International Developed Markets and by a lot more than Emerging Markets
Mid Cap stocks outperformed both Large and Small Cap
Growth and Value performed equally well
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 169 and rose by 11 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 149 and fell by 14 points over the course of the week. Buying Power flipped into a dominant position over Selling Pressure on Thursday.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is now slightly above its 50-day and slightly below its 90-day moving averages but still below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 51. SPY ended the week 14.9% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is slightly below both its 50-day and its 90-day moving averages and still below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 49. QQQ ended the week 24.0% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. El Salvador’s disastrous Bitcoin experiment is now a year old. The flood of wildly optimistic tweets by American crypto bros at the time praising President Bukele’s bizarre decision have all aged rather badly, as the country has deteriorated into pretty much a failed state with rampant gang violence and resulting government repression compounding an economic catastrophe brought about in no small part by the country’s adoption of Bitcoin as legal tender at the urging of, and directly assisted by, US-based Bitcoin evangelists and influencers.
A cautionary tale.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK (ECB)
The European Central Bank (ECB) is the central bank responsible for monetary policy of the European Union (EU) member countries that have adopted the Euro currency. This currency union is known as the Eurozone and currently includes 19 countries. The ECB's primary objective is price stability in the Euro area.
The European Central Bank is headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany. It has been responsible for monetary policy in the Euro area since 1999, when the Euro currency was first adopted by some of the EU members at the time.
The ECB Governing Council makes decisions on eurozone monetary policy, including its objectives, key interest rates and the supply of reserves in the Eurosystem comprising the ECB and national central banks of the eurozone countries. It also sets the general framework for the ECB's role in banking supervision.
The Council consists of six executive board members and a rotation of 15 national central bank governors. Instead of an annual rotation of voting rights, as for regional Federal Reserve bank presidents, the ECB rotates voting rights monthly.
Central bank governors from the top five countries by the size of their economies and banking systems—as of May 2022, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands—share four voting rights, while the central banks of the other countries vote only slightly less frequently at 11 months out of every 14.
The ECB's mandate is for price stability and it targets an annual inflation rate of 2% over the medium term. Like the Federal Reserve's inflation targeting, it is symmetrical, so that inflation too low relative to its target is viewed as negatively as inflation above it. The 2% target provides a buffer against the risk of a destabilizing deflation during a recession.
The primary responsibility of the ECB, linked to its mandate of price stability, is formulating monetary policy. Monetary policy decision meetings are held every six weeks, and the ECB is transparent about the reasoning behind the resulting policy announcements. It holds a press conference after each monetary policy meeting, and later publishes the meeting minutes.
The Eurosystem comprises the ECB and the central banks of Eurozone countries. The Eurosystem manages the euro currency and supports the ECB's monetary policy. The parallel European System of Central Banks includes all central banks of EU states, including those that have not adopted the Euro.
The ECB is also the EU body responsible for banking supervision. In conjunction with national central bank supervisors, it operates what is called the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) to ensure the soundness of the European banking system. The SSM enforces the consistency of banking supervision practices for member countries—lax supervision in some member countries contributed to the European financial crisis. The SSM was launched in 2014. All euro area countries are in the SSM and non-Euro EU countries can choose to join.
SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of any information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Stocks spent most of last week bleeding steadily lower before closing at new, one-month lows on Friday after the release of the latest jobs report. For the week, the S&P 500 dropped about 3% and the NASDAQ gave up around 4%. Both indexes are now at their lowest levels since July 26th.
Markets started the week in a dismal mood, still reeling from Fed chair Jerome Powell’s fire-and-brimstone speech the previous Friday that effectively ruled out an imminent Fed pivot away from interest rake hikes and literally warned of “pain” in the economy. This (frankly bizarre) pivot theory was baked into prevailing stock prices before the speech and therefore an entire price re-set was needed once the theory was finally exposed as nonsense and it is that which caused stock prices to fall so precipitously across the board.
What Powell’s speech showed, and what the market spent most of last week digesting, was that the Fed would clearly rather over-deliver on interest rate hikes and trigger a recession than under-deliver and risk inflation becoming entrenched at its current high levels. Investors were told in no uncertain terms to stop believing the silly narrative that interest rate cuts were just around the corner. It simply ain’t happening.
The Labor Department’s monthly Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) found that job openings held steady and layoffs were little changed last month, in signs of strength for the US job market, which would further support the Fed's case for higher and faster rate hikes.
Chairman Powell’s foot-soldiers were out on stages throughout the country and on the airwaves, pushing the agenda using their favorite weapon; Fed-Speak. Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said that he was “happy to see” the market’s distinctly negative reaction to Powell's comments, asserting that lower stock prices now more accurately reflect the central bank's policy intentions.
Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester said she wants to see several more months of data before saying inflation has peaked and she could not have been more explicit when she said; “I think we’re going to have to move them [interest rates] up .. above 4% and probably need to hold them there next year.”
Given the negative pile-on, it’s not surprising that investors found geo-political reasons to get anxious about, following reports of Taiwan firing live rounds at a Chinese drone flying in its airspace and the fact that Beijing authorities put the city of Chengdu (population: over 20 million) into a COVID lockdown, reminding markets that a Zero-COVID policyis still in effect in that country, which is not good for stocks anywhere.
On Friday, the Labor Department reported that the US economy gained 315k jobs last month, down from July's revised gain of 526k, but a little above the anticipated level of 300k. The unemployment rate ticked up to 3.7%, from 3.5%. All pandemic job losses have now been erased, there are now more people in work than there were in February 2020.
By sector, gains were strongest in the professional and business services sector. Education, health service and retail jobs also rose significantly. Job gains in manufacturing were more modest. The report indicates that employers are continuing to hire, despite the impact of a slowing economy and aggressive interest rate hikes.
The initial market response was positive, maybe the numbers had hit a “Goldilocks” sweet spot, but within an hour of the market open the bleeding had resumed as it seemed to dawn on investors that all this “good” jobs data really did was to simply raise expectations that the Fed could continue to double down on its aggressive interest rate policy.
In this week’s EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK, I talk about and explain the concept of the inverted yield curve and what messages it sends to the markets. The most normal points of comparison are the 2 year yield versus the 10 year yield. But an even more powerful “recession is coming” signal is if/when the 3 month yield goes above the 10 year. This closely-watched spread has been flattening for months now and we are presently not a million miles away from the rates crossing over, which would be viewed as highly significant if it happens.
Attention now very much shifts to the next release of inflation data at 8:30am on Tuesday, September 13th. Trading between now and then is going to largely depend on how investors want to position themselves going into that announcement.
Oh, and September is historically the worst-performing month of the year for US stocks. Past is definitely not prologue, but I’m just saying.
OTHER NEWS:
Gloomy CFOs .. Chief Financial Officer (CFO) expectations have notably worsened this quarter, according to Deloitte’s latest quarterly CFO Signal Survey. Close to half of surveyed CFOs expect the North American economy to be in recession by the end of the year, while 39% expect the North American economy to be in a period of stagflation. Only a third of CFOs rated the current North American economy as “good” or “very good,” a steep drop from just last quarter’s 52%. Sentiment for conditions abroad was even worse, with just 7% of CFOs viewing conditions as good or very good in Europe, China, and South America. The dampened outlook is leading CFOs to reduce spending, and cut their growth expectations for wages and hiring.
The crypto sleaze hits just keep on coming .. The DC attorney general announced that he is charging Bitcoin evangelist Michael Saylor with tax fraud, claiming he has avoided paying taxes on “hundreds of millions of dollars” of income, in an elaborate scheme whereby he falsely masqueraded as a Florida or Virginia resident.
Microstrategy, the company founded by Saylor, which owns more Bitcoin (over 129k coins) than any other entity in the world (nearly 3x what Tesla owns), is also being charged with conspiracy to commit tax fraud in that it is alleged that the firm assisted him with his scheme. Microstrategy’s former CFO, Mark Lynch, is also being charged with the same crime.
Natural gas trouble ..On Friday, Russian energy supplier Gazprom “discovered problems in its key pipeline” that delivers natural gas supplies to Europe. The company said it wouldn't be able to restart operations at the weekend, following routine maintenance, as originally planned. In fact, Gazprom said it was “unsure” when operations would restart.
This sparked fears that a lack of gas supplies in Europe would force countries there to find alternative supplies even faster than planned. The result could push prices higher in the US, causing a rebound in inflation growth.
UNDER THE HOOD:
A tremendous amount of technical deterioration has taken place in the last couple of weeks since the market’s August 16th recovery high. Since that date, Buying Power has plummeted 42 points, far outpacing the 30 point rise in Selling Pressure indicating a remarkable withdrawal of motivated buying interest in US stocks.
On Wednesday, Selling Pressure crossed back into the dominant position above Buying Power. This signal, along with the recent intensity of the selling and other accumulated evidence increases the probabilities of a return to the market’s June 16th low, or even lower.
Important indicators of Demand trends are tumbling back to levels typically associated with an acceleration of market pullbacks, not the end of them. Also of concern is the fact that last week’s down-days coincided with a return to average or even above-average trading volume (indicating increased conviction among the sellers) after weeks of very depressed volume levels (less conviction) during which the indexes mostly moved higher.
In the near term, most short term indicators are now fully over-sold. This is likely to spark a brief relief rally very soon, but indicators of shorter and medium term Demand trends that are still rolling over do not provide much hope that such a rally will be any more than simply a pause in the current overall trend of sinking stock prices.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
U.S. stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday for Labor Day.
It’s a very light week for earnings with DocuSign, GameStop and Kroger the major reporters. Apple will host a product launch event on Wednesday, when it is expected to unveil a new lineup of iPhones and Apple Watches.
The biggest economic data release this week is the Services Purchasing Managers’ index for August on Tuesday. The consensus estimate is for the index to decline by about three points, to 54, which would keep it just about in positive territory.
The European Central Bank will announce a monetary-policy decision on Thursday. Futures markets are pricing in the greatest odds of a 0.75% hike, bringing the benchmark interest rate up from 0.00% to 0.75% in an attempt to combat what is swiftly becoming an energy and cost of living crisis in Europe.
Federal Reserve regional presidents will continue to give speeches and interviews next week (“Fed-Speak”) and the markets will be listening closely to what they say and even how they say it. Their utterances could well have the most impactful influence on the stock market between now and the release of US inflation data on September 13th.
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 22% (down from 33% the previous week)
→Neutral: 28% (down from 30% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 50% (up from 37% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 28 (Bearish by 4 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Duke Energy) - down 0.6%
Last week’s worst performing US sector for the second week in a row: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - down 4.9%
The NASDAQ-100 fell by more than the S&P 500
US Markets fell by more than International Developed Markets but less than Emerging Markets
Not much in it, but Large Cap stocks did less badly than both Mid and Small Cap
Growth stocks performed worse than Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 158 and fell by 18 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 163 and rose by 15 points over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, remains below both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 36. SPY ended the week 17.9% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, remains below both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 35. QQQ ended the week 26.9% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. In Tales from the Dark Side, Barry Ritholtz talks about the two worlds of investment advice. The right way, fiduciary Registered Investment Advisors (RIAs) like Barry’s firm and Anglia Advisors with a responsibility to operate in the client’s best interests and never pushing any kind of product sale.
And the dark side, the way 85% of financial advisors operate in this country; a commission-hungry, transactional business model that prioritizes what’s best for the advisor and the advisor’s firm over any of the client’s interests and charges obscene and unjustified fees for getting their clients buy as much as possible of usually underperforming and unsuitable rubbish investments.
Those of us on Team RIA are stealing business from the transaction-obsessed, commission-grubbing crowd every year and we will continue to do so at an accelerating pace. Do you know which side your financial advisor is on?
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia to try to help explain Wall Street’s gobbledygook (may be edited at times for clarity) .
INVERTED YIELD CURVE
[The yield curve is currently inverted and has been since early July, with 10 year Treasury interest rates as of Friday about 0.20% lower than 2 year rates]
An inverted yield curve describes the unusual drop of yields on longer-term debt below yields on short-term debt of the same credit quality, an inversion of the much more common opposite scenario.
Sometimes referred to as a negative yield curve, the inverted curve has proven in the past to be a relatively reliable lead indicator of a recession.
The yield curve graphically represents yields on similar bonds across a variety of maturities. It is also known as the term structure of interest rates. For example, the U.S. Treasury daily publishes Treasury bill and bond yields that can be charted as a curve.
Analysts often distill yield curve signals to a spread between two maturities. This simplifies the task of interpreting a yield curve in which an inversion exists between some maturities but not others. The downside is that there is no general agreement as to which spread serves as the most reliable recession indicator.
Most commonly, the yield curve slopes upward, reflecting the fact that holders of longer-term debt have taken on more risk and are therefore more highly rewarded by earning higher interest.
A yield curve inverts when long-term interest rates drop below short-term rates, indicating that investors are moving money away from short-term bonds and into long-term ones. This suggests that the market as a whole is becoming more pessimistic about the economic prospects for the near future.
Such an inversion has served as a relatively reliable recession indicator in the modern era. Because yield curve inversions are relatively rare yet have often preceded recessions, they typically draw heavy scrutiny from financial market participants.
Academic studies of the relationship between an inverted yield curve and recessions have tended to look at the spread between the yields on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond and the three-month Treasury bill, while market participants have more often focused on the yield spread between the 10-year and two-year bonds.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said in March 2022 that he prefers to gauge recession risk by the difference between the current three-month Treasury bill rate and the market pricing of derivatives predicting the same rate 18 months later.
It should be noted that while an inverted yield curve has often preceded recessions in recent decades, it does not actually cause them. Rather, bond prices reflect investors' expectations that longer-term yields will decline, as typically happens in a recession.
SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of any information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
How quickly that half-full glass I talked about last week has emptied. A third consecutive week of stock market losses ended with a thousand point fall in the Dow Jones Industrial Average on Friday as Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, talking at the Fed’s annual jamboree in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, ferociously doubled down on the central bank’s commitment to raise interest rates as aggressively as is needed to bring current high inflation levels back down towards the target level of 2%. I’ll come back to this later.
The durable goods report for July was disappointing, which may have been a good thing since all economic data is now viewed through the lens of “What will it make the Fed do?” and it suggested a welcome slowing of demand which could throw a little cold water on inflation and thereby reduced risk of greater interest rate rises. It showed new orders for big ticket items were virtually unchanged last month. Economists had expected a 0.5% increase after June's 2.2% gain.
The same can be said of the release of US and European Purchasing Managers’ Indexes (a monthly survey of supply chain managers across all industries which measures the prevailing direction of economic trends in manufacturing). The results were disappointing relative to analyst expectations and indicate an economic slowdown, thereby potentially reducing the need for outsized interest rate hikes.
Evidence of this slowdown is locked in combat, however, with increasingly hawkish (i.e. more inclined to raise interest rates) Fed-speak as Fed presidents continue to weaponize their words, literally yelling at the stock market that it was being way too over-optimistic.
The idea that Powell’s speech would be a happy-clappy celebration of the recent apparent stalling of inflation and that he would begin to ease the rhetoric on interest rate hikes started to recede early in the week as the consensus began to shift to the (ultimately accurate) position that in fact the Fed would be striking a more hawkish tone on Friday to combat recent market exuberance and continuing resilient labor market conditions and stock prices began to tumble in anticipation.
Obviously, the Saudis weren’t particularly listening during Biden’s recent visit as their energy minister last week suggested OPEC+ nations may now cut production to keep prices high. The price of oil duly spiked, which is mostly bad news for stocks not in the energy sector.
Going into Friday’s speech, the futures market bet on the likelihood of a three-quarter point rate hike rather than a half point at the September 20th/21st meeting started shifting back to a probability of over 50%.
Which brings us back to Powell’s words on Friday which spooked investors so badly. The market’s gut feelings that a nasty Fed Friday surprise was brewing proved to be correct. J.P. was uncommonly succinct and direct, aiming to convey nothing but steely resolve in the central bank's efforts to bring down inflation. He suggested recent inflation results that show cooling prices were much too small a sample size to affect Fed policy yet.
His key words were; "While higher interest rates, slower growth, and softer labor market conditions will bring down inflation, they will also bring some pain to households and businesses. These are the unfortunate costs of reducing inflation. But a failure to restore price stability would mean far greater pain."
He hit back at the bizarre Wall Street narrative that somehow built up recently that the Fed may start cutting rates again next year. He talked about a “sustained period” of low growth and higher interest rates and even specifically said that"the historical record cautions strongly against prematurely loosening policy [i.e. cutting interest rates]".
This flawed rate-cut story that Wall Street had concocted, based on absolutely nothing as far as I could see, is behind at least a part of the significant rally we have seen since mid-June. Now that’s off the table, it was inevitable that the market would have a tantrum on Friday as it tends to do whenever anyone takes one of its toys away.
As I have mentioned many times, the viability and continuation of the June-to-August rally depends on the feel-good vibes that have driven it actually being grounded in reality. Cracks are appearing in that whole narrative and markets are now taking back many of those gains, effectively pleading guilty to the Fed’s charges of recent over-optimism.
OTHER NEWS:
Student loan debt cancellation .. I sent out a special edition of Angles to all subscribers on Thursday immediately following the announcement with a summary of what we know so far.
Cute little money pits .. The Brookings Institute determined that an average married, middle-income couple with two children would spend $310,600 - an average of $18,271 per year (after tax obviously) to raise just their younger child born in 2015 through age 17. The estimate covers a range of expenses, including housing, food, clothing, healthcare and child care, and accounts for childhood milestones and activities, diapers, haircuts, sports equipment and dance lessons, among many other costs.
The calculation uses an earlier government estimate as a baseline, with adjustments for inflation trends. The total has increased by over $26k - or more than 9% - since the previous calculation in 2020.
Like a bad movie? .. Shares of legendary meme-stock and Reddit crowd fave AMC Entertainment Holdings (AMC) plunged on Monday as a rival theater operator said it is considering bankruptcy, prompting CEO Adam Aron to issue an upbeat, “nothing to see here” statement. On August 16th, AMC stock reached almost $23. On Friday, it closed just above $9.
However, it should be noted that the apparent price crash coincided with the debut listing of AMC’s preferred shares (preferred ticker symbol APE) on the New York Stock Exchange, distributed to shareholders instead of a dividend - so in fact the value of a shareholder’s holding is the aggregate of AMC and APE, something mostly overlooked by financial headline writers heralding the AMC price fall as a total catastrophe without due consideration of APE.
Earlier, British-based Cineworld, the world’s second-largest theater chain and operator of Regal Cinemas in the US, was undergoing a genuine catastrophe. It confirmed that it will likely file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) as it tries to restructure its gruesome-looking balance sheet.
Cineworld blamed a lack of blockbuster movies and residual effects of COVID-19 lockdowns on theater attendance for an explosion of debt, which it put at $8.9 billion at the end of 2021.
GDP saga part 2 .. The Commerce Department reported the revised second of three estimates of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) showing a 0.6% fall in Q2, down from the first estimate of 0.9% that caused such a flap at the end of last month.
Economists had expected the second estimate to show a decline of 0.8%. We now await the third revised estimate, which will determine what GDP number for Q2 2022 will actually go into the history books.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Short-term overbought readings began to take their toll, as stocks pulled back to digest their gains. Overbought conditions in and of themselves are not sell signals. They set the stage, but require some sort of spark to bring out pent-up selling.
The viability and extent of this spark is far more interesting than what caused the overbought conditions in the first place, which can be just the simple attainment of the 200-day moving average (200 DMA) by the major indexes (more on this below), extended valuations after a mostly uninterrupted period of gains or a troublesome word from the Federal Reserve (all of which have been in play for the last week or two). The reaction that set in on August 19th has seen a number of days of pretty intense selling, not least on Friday.
In May 2008, a market recovery stalled right at its 200 DMA. The S&P 500 then went on to fall another 53% before bottoming out almost a year later. Similarly, the bear market of 2000–2002 saw several failed breakout attempts above the 200 DMA that ultimately resolved in a peak-to-trough decline of 49%. Okay, it’s certainly true out that most rallies that fail at the 200 DMA do not turn into a 2001 or 2008. However, while it remains to be seen whether the rally from the lows of June 16th resumes or fizzles, a substantial pullback from here still remains a real risk.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
A few moreS&P 500 companies remain to report their Q2 results next week, including Hewlett Packard, Baidu, Best Buy, Broadcom, Campbell Soup, Lululemon and Chewy.
The main event on the economic calendar will be Friday's release of the August employment report. Economists on average are forecasting a gain of 270k jobs, and for the unemployment rate to remain unchanged at 3.5%.
Other data out next week will include the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) for July, the Case-Shiller National Home Price Index for June, and the Consumer Confidence Index for August.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 33% (unchanged from 33% the previous week)
→Neutral: 30% (unchanged from 30% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 37% (unchanged from 37% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 4 (Bearish by 4 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 3.9%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - down 5.8%
The NASDAQ-100 fell further than the S&P 500
US Markets fell by much more than International Developed Markets and Emerging Markets
Not much in it, but Large Cap stocks underperformed both Mid and Small Cap
Growth stocks performed far worse than Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 176 and fell by 6 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 148 and fell by 1 point over the course of the week.
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is now back below both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and still well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 44. SPY ended the week 15.2% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is now back below both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages and still well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 43. QQQ ended the week 23.9% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. The world of exchange traded funds (ETFs) is buzzing with the controversial recent release of the first single stock ETFs. Be very, very careful before being sucked in.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
CHAPTER 11
Chapter 11 is a form of bankruptcy that involves a reorganization of a debtor’s business affairs, debts, and assets, and for that reason is known as "reorganization" bankruptcy.
Named after the U.S. bankruptcy code 11, corporations generally file Chapter 11 if they require time to restructure their debts. This version of bankruptcy gives the debtor a fresh start. However, the terms are subject to the debtor’s fulfillment of its obligations under the plan of reorganization.
Chapter 11 bankruptcy is the most complex of all bankruptcy cases. It is also usually the most expensive form of a bankruptcy proceeding. For these reasons, a company must consider Chapter 11 reorganization only after careful analysis and exploration of all other possible alternatives.
During a Chapter 11 proceeding, the court will help a business restructure its debts and obligations. In most cases, the firm remains open and operating. Many large U.S. companies file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and stay afloat. Such businesses include automobile giant General Motors, the airline United Airlines, retail outlet K-mart, and thousands of other corporations of all sizes.
Corporations, partnerships, and limited liability companies (LLCs) usually file Chapter 11, but in rare cases, individuals with a lot of debt who do not qualify for Chapter 7 or 13 may be eligible for Chapter 11. However, the process is not a speedy one.
A business in the midst of filing Chapter 11 may continue to operate. In most cases the debtor, called a “debtor in possession,” runs the business as usual. However, in cases involving fraud, dishonesty, or gross incompetence, a court-appointed trustee steps in to run the company throughout the entire bankruptcy proceedings.
The business is not able to make some decisions without the permission of the courts. These include the sale of assets, other than inventory, starting or terminating a rental agreement, and stopping or expanding business operations. The court also has control over decisions related to retaining and paying attorneys and entering contracts with vendors and unions. Finally, the debtor cannot arrange a loan that will commence after the bankruptcy is complete.
In Chapter 11, the individual or business filing bankruptcy has the first chance to propose a reorganization plan. These plans may include downsizing business operations to reduce expenses, as well as renegotiating debts. In some cases, plans involve liquidating all assets to repay creditors. If the chosen path is feasible and fair, the courts accept it, and the process moves forward.
The Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, which went into effect on Feb. 19, 2020, added a new subchapter V to Chapter 11 designed to make bankruptcy easier for small businesses, which are “defined as entities with less than about $2.7 million in debts that also meet other criteria,” according to the U.S. Department of Justice.
The act “imposes shorter deadlines for completing the bankruptcy process, allows for greater flexibility in negotiating restructuring plans with creditors, and provides for a private trustee who will work with the small business debtor and its creditors to facilitate the development of a consensual plan of reorganization”.
SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or a basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The market appears to have decided that the glass is half full, for the moment at least. Last week’s stock price declines, mostly concentrated on Friday, can essentially be put down to the seriously overbought conditions brought about by four straight weeks of gains and two months of solid progress. There wasn’t a whole lot else behind the price slump.
Yes, perhaps economic data out of both New York state and China disappointed to start the week and some late-week Fed-speak attempted to dampen recent exuberance generated by the growing view that the days of rate hikes of more than half a percent at a time may now over.
But the intense pessimism of the first half of 2022 now seems a distant memory already. War in Europe, runaway inflation, an inevitable collapse in corporate profits, a bumbling, behind-the-curve Federal Reserve forced to push the economy into recession; you don’t hear about all this nearly as much these days. A string of solid employment and, more recently, inflation data, much better-than-feared Q2 earnings and a tangible pullback in commodity prices are behind the shift.
The latest Bank of America Global Fund Manager Survey reported that sentiment remains bearish among investment professionals, but is easing for the first time in a good while.
Retail earnings kicked off the week with some good news as both Walmart (WMT) and Home Depot (HD) reported better-than-expected results for Q2. Shares of both retailers have been punished at times in 2022 as investors worried about inflation and a slowing economy. But these earnings provided a sigh of relief. Target (TGT) and Lowe’s (LOW) numbers weren’t as robust, but since investors are currently sporting rose-tinted spectacles, they were relatively forgiving.
U.S. consumers continued opening their wallets last month, shifting savings from falling gas prices to purchases of everyday goods as they continue to weather high inflation and a slowing economy. Overall retail sales were flat in July compared with the prior month’s revised 0.8% increase but the measure of spending that strips out gasoline and auto sales rose 0.7% last month, showing shoppers maintained the ability to spend with much of the spending moving online.
Minutes from last month’s Fed meeting released last week showed the members agreed that inflation was still too high and decided to increase the Fed’s key lending rate by 0.75% to a range of 2.25% to 2.50%. Officials see the fight against inflation as far from over. Recent declines in oil and other commodity prices can be largely dismissed, officials said, because they could quickly rebound just as easily, while gains in stickier categories like rents are expected to be ongoing.
However, the participants indicated that as monetary policy tightened further, “it likely would become appropriate at some point to slow the pace of policy rate increases” while the Fed analyzed the effects on economic activity and inflation. In other words, wait and see.
Frankly, I don’t see any policy shift here or indeed anything new at all and I was a bit puzzled as to why the market reacted so favorably to the release as if it represented some kind of new set of positive information or a sign of movement in a favorable new direction. A steep late-week fall in stocks suggested that maybe some kind of reassessment of this initial impression was going on.
The year-end Fed Funds interest rate (the “terminal rate”) is still expected to be between 3.00%-3.50%. This expectation has not changed for a good while now. Regarding September’s hike in rates, it’s now considered more likely to be half a percent although three-quarters is still on the table.
Put simply however; in order for the Fed to declare the rate hike cycle is ending (the holy grail of peak Fed hawkishness), it’s got to be very confident that:
the labor market will return to a better state of balance between job vacancies and the number of unemployed Americans (not happening yet).
that inflation will gradually be on course to return to the 2% target (not happening yet).
that future inflation expectations will remain well anchored at least near 2% (not happening yet).
We have weeks for these pieces to fall into place, but the recent pace of progress cannot afford to show any signs of slowing down. Otherwise that half-full glass might very quickly start to look a lot emptier.
OTHER NEWS:
Housing grab-bag .. Housing appears to be transitioning from a tailwind to a headwind for the US economy and could well actually subtract from real GDP growth over the next year. Higher mortgage rates and soaring property prices means that, even as they spend more at Home Depot and Walmart, Americans are no longer spending so lavishly on buying new homes. And that's causing home builders to make adjustments.
New home construction fell more than expected last month as demand slowed substantially. Housing starts declined from June to the fewest since February 2021. Starts for both single-family homes and multi family units dipped 10%. Every region in the country had a drop in starts, except the Northeast. Building Permitsalso were down, sliding 1.3% to a 10-month low. The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) said confidence among its members was the lowest since May 2020.
Sales of previously-owned existing homes slid 5.9% in July from the prior month to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.81 million, the weakest rate since November 2015, not counting the pandemic-related drop in 2020, the National Association of Realtors said Thursday. July sales fell 20.2% from a year earlier.
This was also the sixth consecutive month of existing home sales declines. The last time that happened, Miley’s wrecking ball was swinging through the Billboard charts in 2013.
The number of home sale cancelations also soared in July to another two-year high as buyers continue to pull back. About 63,000 home sales were canceled last month, that’s about 16% of homes that went into contract.
Meme stock nonsense is back again - with the same result .. Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) shares had their worst day ever on Friday, falling more than 36% in a matter of hours. Self-styled meme stock influencer Ryan Cohen’s RC Ventures announced Thursday evening that it had sold its entire position in the company. Cohen, who is also the chairman of GameStop, had owned about 12% of the firm’s entire float of shares and had been a guiding light to this latest iteration of the Reddit meme stock crowd who focused on buying up the stock using the Gamestop/AMC January 2021 playbook.
On Tuesday, its stock price soared almost 70% intraday because of a short squeeze (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below). It finished the day up 29%. From that point to Cohen’s announcement late Thursday, it gained another 17%. At one point on Thursday, the stock was up almost 450% in August alone.
The seemingly-doomed retailer spent 2021 and most of 2022 closing stores all over the place and massively reducing its workforce. It ended its most recent quarter with a little more than $100 million in cash to stay alive. Analysts now question whether vendors will agree to ship all the holiday merchandise Bed Bath & Beyond needs because of its awful finances.
Needless to say, Ryan Cohen isn’t quite as popular with the retail meme stock crowd now that he has dropped them all like a hot potato, pocketing an estimated $68m in seven months for himself along the way.
Please be careful who you blindly follow like a financial groupie.
Problems in the Metaverse .. Meta’sMark Zuckerberg has once again been publicly blasted on Twitter and elsewhere and this time it’s not over product-placing his favorite barbecue sauce. Last Tuesday, he Facebook-posted a screenshotfrom the company’s Horizon Worlds celebrating the game’s release in France and Spain. The image shows his awkward, dead-eyed avatar standing in an empty landscape populated only by a small version of the Eiffel Tower and Barcelona’s unfinished Sagrada Familia.
The reception was brutal, with people saying that it somehow manages to look worse than the world depicted in the decades-old “The Sims” game that used to come on a floppy disk. Not only does Zuck’s world look rubbish apparently, it was also pointed out that it seems to be riddled with virtual sexual assault, child-grooming, racist and homophobic hate speech and the peddling of ludicrous and dangerous conspiracy theories.
His timing wasn’t great either, as this all came out on the same day Fortnite introduced its mega-popular crossover with Dragon Ball Z, bolstering its apparently much more fun, better-looking and (ironically) safer version of the concept.
The company’s whole pivot to Meta seems to not be working very well and is reflected by the action of the stock price which has whacked stockholders, crumbling from over $382 to below $168 in less than a year.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Despite retreating late last week from what was the world’s most obvious short-term overbought condition, there has been a perceptible shift in the market’s underlying condition when you look at its recent body of work. This was the kind of transformation that may be hard to see in real time, but now with several weeks’ gain under the market’s belt, we can step back to see what has happened.
The S&P 500 and Russell 2000 (small cap stocks) indexes both tested their respective key 200-day moving averages last week which is a notably bullish development on the charts, despite the fact that they were unable to maintain themselves north of the average for very long.
Last week, Selling Pressure reached multi-month lows and Buying Power hit multi-month highs before both reversing a little later in the week. One of the nagging problems with the rally had previously been the lack of any meaningful buying of the most beaten-down stocks. The Percent of Stocks 20% Or More Below One Year Highs had stayed stubbornly high, but over the past week or so it fell sharply to drop below the key 50% level. While this is not an especially strong reading of itself, it is below a threshold observed in very weak markets and is definitely heading in the right direction.
On the opposite side of the strength spectrum, the Percent of Stocks At Or Within 2% Of One Year Highs has finally lifted off from single digits to reflect rising Demand intensity. Here, too, it is not currently a super-powerful reading in a historical context, but its trajectory is now very much positive. Conversely, the Percent of Stocks At New Lows has dried up to near-zero.
There are still plenty of technical concerns that prevent a declaration of victory for the bulls. Trading volume is still terrible, dramatically reducing the quality and validity of signals shown by price action and, despite Friday’s pullback, we are still experiencing overbought conditions, as shown by still-elevated Relative Strength Index readings (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below).
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
A bunch of technology and retail companies will report their Q2 2022 results this week, including Salesforce, Zoom, Nvidia, Dell, Intuit, VMware, Snowflake, Macy’s, Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Nordstrom, Williams-Sonoma, Burlington Stores and Ulta Beauty.
Federal Reserve nerds will be tuning into the central bank's annual bash in Jackson Hole, Wyoming at the end of the week with economists and officials excitedly discussing this year's theme of “Reassessing Constraints on the Economy and Policy”.
Economic data coming out includes manufacturing and services purchasing managers’ indexes for August and the durable goods report and personal income and spending figures for July.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 33% (up from 32% the previous week)
→Neutral: 30% (down from 31% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 37% (unchanged from 37% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 4 (Bearish by 5 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Weekly sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays or Wednesdays
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Coca-Cola) - up 1.8%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Communications Services (two biggest holdings: Meta/Facebook, Alphabet/Google) - down 3.1%
The S&P 500 fell further than the NASDAQ-100
US Markets fell by less than International Developed Markets which in turn fell by less than Emerging Markets
Mid and Small Cap stocks underperformed Large Cap
Growth stocks did worse than Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 184 and fell by 14 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 149 and rose by 10 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but is still below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 61. SPY ended the week 11.6% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF is above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but is still below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 57. QQQ ended the week 20.0% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. As the idea of brunch as a social event continues making its comeback, here are some highly recommended spots in New York for this sacred meal.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
SHORT SQUEEZE
A short squeeze is an unusual condition that triggers rapidly rising prices in a stock or other tradable security. For a short squeeze to occur, the security must have an unusual degree of short sellers holding positions in it. The short squeeze begins when the price jumps higher unexpectedly. The condition plays out as a significant measure of the short sellers coincidentally decide to cut losses and exit their positions.
When a heavily shorted stock unexpectedly rises in price, the short sellers may have to act fast to limit their losses. Short sellers borrow shares of an asset they believe will drop in price in order to buy them after they fall. If they're right, they return the shares and pocket the difference between the price when they initiated the short and the price when they buy the shares back to close out the short position. If they're wrong, they're forced to buy at a higher price and pay the difference between the price they set and its sale price.
Because short sellers exit their positions with buy orders, the coincidental exit of these short sellers pushes prices higher. The continued rapid rise in price also attracts buyers to the security. The combination of new buyers and panicked short sellers creates a rapid rise in price that can be stunning and unprecedented.
As noted, short sellers open positions on stocks that they believe will decline in price. However sound their reasoning, a positive news story, a product announcement, or an earnings beat that excites the interest of buyers can upend this. The turnaround in the stock’s fortunes may prove to be temporary. But if it's not, the short seller can face runaway losses as the expiration date on their positions approaches. They generally opt to sell out immediately even if it means taking a substantial loss.
That's where the short squeeze comes in. Every buying transaction by a short seller sends the price higher, forcing another short seller to buy. Active traders will monitor highly shorted stocks and watch for them to start rising. If the price begins to pick up momentum, the trader jumps in to buy, trying to catch what could be a short squeeze and a significant move higher.
Short Squeeze Example:
Consider a hypothetical biotech company, Medicom, which has a drug candidate in advanced clinical trials.
There is considerable skepticism among investors about whether this drug will actually work. As a result, there is heavy short interest. In fact, 5 million Medicom shares have been sold short of its 25 million shares outstanding. That means the short interest in Medicom is 20%, and with daily trading volume averaging 1 million shares, the short interest ratio is five. The short interest ratio, also called days to cover, means that it will take five days for short sellers to buy back all Medicom shares that have been sold short.
Assume that because of the huge short interest, Medicom had declined from $15 a few months ago to $5. Then, the news comes out that Medicom’s drug works better than expected. Medicom’s shares jump to $9, as speculators buy the stock and short sellers scramble to cover their short positions.
Everyone who shorted the stock between $9 and $5 is now in a losing position. Those who sold short near $5 are facing the biggest losses and will be frantically looking to get out because they are losing 80% of their investment.
The stock opens at $9, but it will continue to rally for the next several days as the shorts continue to cover their positions and the rising price and positive news attract new buyers.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice or a basis for any investment decisions. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
While the FBI searching Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago and its aftermath might have been the biggest deal in the civilian media last week, it was a complete non-event as far as the financial markets were concerned. There was only ever going to be one story last week. Well, maybe one and a half.
Data released on Wednesday showed that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation was unchanged in July after a 1.3% rise in June, as gasoline prices fell sharply, offsetting continued increases in food and shelter costs. The year-on-year increase was 8.5%, down from 9.1% in June. The Core number, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also showed signs of softening - edging up just 0.3% in July and now up 5.9% from a year ago. All these came in lower than expected.
The following day we learned that the less impactful but still important Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation of manufacturing raw materials actually fell 0.5% in July after a 1.0% gain in June, and was up “only” 9.8% from a year ago, down sharply from the year-on-year rate of 11.3% the previous month and well below analyst expectations.
While both of these releases reinforced the idea of peak inflation, Fed-speak from various regional Fed presidents which generally described the data as a “welcome sign” that“could lead to a slowing” in the pace of rate hikes (for example, half a percent in September, not three-quarters) also pointed to the possibility of peak Fed hawkishness maybe having been reached.
As regular readers will remember me saying, a perception that we have reached peak inflation and peak Fed hawkishness are two of the major requirements for a sustainable market recovery.
So the investor battle lines are drawn ..
On one side are the bulls. In their perfect world:
there would be an accelerated decline in inflation,
a very moderate slowing of growth,
the Fed opening the door to a pause in interest rate hikes in 2022 and regional Presidents backing off hawkish statements
China either has a much-reduced level of COVID cases or backs away from its Zero-COVID policy,
some kind of de-escalation, a pause or a cease-fire in the Ukrainian conflict.
This ultra-cheerful scenario could generate a very significant further jump in stock prices across the board, possibly in the indiscriminate and chaotic manner that technical analysts have been waiting for to complete that final transition from overall bearish back to bullish conditions.
The S&P 500 has already recovered more than half of its January 4th to June 16th decline in less than two months.
Futures market positioning now strongly favors the probability of “only” a half a percent interest rate rise at the next Fed meeting in September instead of the previously-favored three-quarters of a percent and there are even a few Optimist Ultras who think it could be less than that.
Since bottoming at 10,646 on June 16th, the NASDAQ composite index has rallied 22.5% to close last week at 13,047, technically entering a new bull market (up over 20% from a recent low). While the new bull market designation is largely symbolic, it does bring to an end the longest bear market for the index since the dark days of 2008.
Lined up against the bulls are the bears who warn of a scenario where:
inflation just flatlines or dribbles slightly lower rather than substantially declines,
growth falls at a faster rate than inflation creating stagflation (see my weekly review entitled “Fear The Stag” from way back in October last year). At SPX 4,280, stagflation is most definitely not priced into stocks in any way,
the Fed doubles down on its commitment to keep raising interest rates as much and as frequently as it needs to in order to defeat inflation and regional presidents are not afraid to publicly talk up this strategy,
China continues to have to impose lockdowns over scattered outbreaks and a still-robust Zero-COVID policy,
there is no sign of de-escalation, a pause or a cease-fire in the Ukrainian conflict.
This much more gloomy scenario could potentially unmask the recent rally as simply a house of cards and in need of correction back down to mid-June lows or even below to reinvigorate any kind of justified sustainable Demand.
They argue that, by virtue of shorter term interest rates being higher than longer term ones (the infamous “inverted yield curve”) the bond market is screaming that we are headed for an economic contraction that hasn’t even had a chance to start yet. The economy has not yet begun to really feel the impact of higher interest rates, they say, since these take time to filter through. Normally, the economy has years to absorb 3% of interest rate increases. By September, the Fed will likely have hiked 3 full percentage points in the space of six months.
As for the new NASDAQ bull market, they argue that explosive rallies of 20%+ are actually more common in bear markets than in bull markets. From 2000 to 2002, for example, the NASDAQ had multiple upswings of more than 20% that were each followed by steep declines and renewed lows within months. It wasn’t until October 2002 that the index finally entered a bull market that lasted for a few years.
A similar pattern was seen during the 2008-09 financial crisis. The NASDAQ gained 25% from November 2008 to January 2009, but then fell 23% from January to March that year before it hit its lowest point of the crisis on March 9th 2009.
But first blood went to the bulls, traders were impressed with the inflation data and started pushing prices meaningfully higher, spurred on by the approving nods from the Fed regional presidents and a general lack of fresh worrying news out of China.
The bull case is getting more traction at the moment, although that can certainly change. It unquestionably doesn’t hurt that it is the preferred scenario that investors emotionally want to happen. Financial markets are often depicted as being like cyborgs driven by streams of purely quantitative data running roughshod over investor hopes and dreams. But sometimes such emotional “tilts” can put a thumb on the scale and be the bulls’ secret weapon.
OTHER NEWS:
Biden-bound .. The Senate passed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (see this week’s EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below), a climate and tax package which would raise more than $700 billion in government revenue partly driven by a 15% minimum tax on large corporations. It passed through the House on Friday and is now heading to Biden’s desk for the president’s signature. Broadly speaking, it’s deemed to probably be net slightly positive for the green energy space and net slightly negative for pharma, but generally markets don’t expect its passage to have much meaningful impact on stock prices in the near term.
Not so fast .. Over 38% of U.S. adults say they are now reconsidering major milestones such as buying a house or a car because of inflation. More than half of respondents to the survey from TheBalance.com said that, while they had been considering buying a car, getting married, purchasing a home, having a child and/or other major milestones in the next twelve months, inflation has forced them to reconsider those choices.
Buying a car topped the list as the #1 milestone to be delayed. The next most common major purchase to be delayed was a home purchase. Of those who were originally thinking of buying a house in the next year, 78% are now planning to delay the purchase or are reconsidering the idea altogether. Among those who were considering changing careers in the next year, 72% are now planning to delay taking such action or are completely reconsidering doing it at all.
Slapping it on the plastic ..In a sign of the continuing toll from decades-high inflation, Americans loaded an extra $46 billion on their credit cards during Q2 2022 and their balances saw the sharpest increase in more than 20 years. Credit card debt grew 5.5% from Q1 to Q2 and 13% year-on-year.
Overall, Americans added $312 billion in mortgage and non-mortgage debt during Q2, an increase that New York Fed researchers called “pretty sizable”. In fact, it’s the largest nominal increase since The Bieb advised you to love yourself in 2016. Data also showed rising delinquency levels in credit card, car loan and other forms of debt.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Heading into the CPI number, fading short-term Demand and plummeting volume, along with highly overbought conditions and formidable potential technical resistance approaching made for shaky short term conditions. As has been mentioned in the last couple of my reports, it is the withdrawal of Supply that has been the primary technical driver of the rally rather than an expansion in Demand and that starts to become a problem after a while.
Healthy, sustainable advances are almost always accompanied by roughly symmetrical heavy expansions in Buying Power (Demand) and contractions in Selling Pressure (Supply) in a high volume market and that is just not what is happening right now. It’s mostly about simply a drop in Supply in a very low volume market (now at its lowest level in eight months).
The spotlight going into Wednesday’s inflation release was very much on the buyers, who have so far been rather careful and measured, to step up big time and start going a little crazy and for volume to expand sharply. And they probably need to do this soon, before this whole rally risks fizzling out or even meaningfully reversing as a result of their relative inactivity.
Of course, the lows of June 16th on poor Demand and low volume could still yet prove to be the bear market bottom, but it would be as a result of seller apathy rather than buyer enthusiasm. While not unprecedented, that is a far more unusual and insecure foundation for a valid market turnaround.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR .
This week will see some particularly interesting earnings reports as many retailers will announce which could give some insight into the state of the US consumer. The big names reporting next week include Walmart, Home Depot, Lowe’s, Target, TJ Maxx, Bath & Body Works, Ross Stores, Estee Lauder, John Deere, Cisco, Applied Materials and Agilent Technologies.
Further insight into consumer behavior can be gleaned from next week’s release of retail sales figures which is expected to keep growing, albeit at a slower pace.
Lots of housing data this week. The National Association of Home Builders releases its housing market index for August. The consensus estimate is for a 53 reading, compared to July’s 55. The Census Bureau reports new residential data for July. Forecasts call for a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.53 million new housing starts, about 30,000 fewer than in June. Then the National Association of Realtors reports existing home sales for July. Expectations are for a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.85 million homes sold.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 32% (up from 30% the previous week)
→Neutral: 31% (unchanged from 31% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 37% (down from 39% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 5 (Bearish by 9 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and Wednesdays
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 7.6%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Proctor and Gamble, Coca-Cola) - up 1.3%
The S&P 500 outperformed the NASDAQ-100
US Markets and International Developed Markets performed equally and both finished ahead of Emerging Markets
Mid Cap stocks beat out Large and Small Cap
Value stocks did slightly better than Growth
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 198 and rose by 13 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 139 and fell by 17 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but still just below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 72. SPY ended the week 10.6% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF is above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but still below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 67. QQQ ended the week 18.2% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. What you need to consider as you try to financially navigate each decade of your life.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
INFLATION REDUCTION ACT OF 2022
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, H.R. 5376, is designed to reduce the deficit and lower inflation while investing in domestic energy production and lowering healthcare drug costs. It passed the Senate on August 7th 2022 and the House of Representatives on August 12th and is now set to be signed into law by President Biden. In essence, the legislation is a scaled-down version of the Build Back Better Act proposed by the Biden administration in 2021.
According to Senate Democrats, the proposed legislation would raise $725 billion, require total investments of $433 billion, and result in a deficit reduction of more than $292 billion. The bill allows Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices and extends the expanded Affordable Care Act program for three years, through 2025.
Additionally, the agreement establishes policies designed to promote and support domestic energy and transmission projects. The goal: to lower costs for consumers and help the U.S. meet long-term emissions goals.
According to the White House, the Inflation Reduction Act would make "the single largest investment in climate and energy in American history."2 Spending is designed to lower energy costs, increase cleaner energy production, and reduce carbon emissions by 40% by 2030.1
The bill accomplishes a longstanding Democratic goal to allow Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices, although there are limits to both the number of drugs affected and the time frame involved. Another plus is a $2,000 annual cap on out-of-pocket drug costs. ACA healthcare premiums will be lowered for millions of Americans under the legislation for three years once the bill becomes law.
A significant funding source for programs in the legislation will be a 15% corporate minimum tax on companies making more than a billion dollars per year. Meantime, the bill imposes no new taxes on families that make $400,000 or less or on certain small businesses.
Each component of the 755-page bill falls under one of two areas listed in the table: revenue or investments. Since the legislation raises more revenue than the amount spent, the difference between the two is available for deficit reduction.
[Click here and scroll down to see all the specific provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022]
+1 (646) 713-2225 | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Markets basically just churned last week in advance of Friday’s release of the latest jobs data, with the S&P 500 closing on Thursday afternoon just a touch higher than it started the week on Monday morning.
Pelosi’s Taiwan visit and China’s entirely predictable reaction only briefly raised pulses but markets basically ignored it. Nothing to see here. Silly geopolitical stunts are not driving market sentiment, it’s still investors’ perceptions of future Federal Reserve (see EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) actions.
Federal Reserve regional presidents seem to be reverting to their playbook of having stock markets do their work for them by using soundbites to accomplish some serious expectation-setting. Here’s me playing right into their hands;
Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari sounded very punchy:“We are a long way away from achieving an economy that is back at 2% inflation. And that’s where we need to get to.”
San Francisco Fed president Mary Dalytold CNBCthat the central bank was “nowhere near almost done” raising interest rates to combat inflation.
Chicago Fed president Charles Evans said that a third-straight 0.75% hike in September might be appropriate if there was no meaningful downturn in inflation by then.
Cleveland Fed president Loretta Mester: "We have more work to do .. it's got to be a sustained several months of evidence that inflation has first peaked - we haven't even seen that yet - and then that it's moving down”
St. Louis Fed president James Bullard said that the Fed Funds rate will have to end 2022 in a range of 3.75% to 4.00% – which implies another 1.50% more in rate hikes from here.
As I mentioned last week, the recent market rally is almost entirely under-pinned by the assumption that we have now reached peak inflation (and thereby we are closer to peak Fed interest rate hiking). This upcoming week, we will begin to find out if that assumption is justified with the release of the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation and the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation.
But last week was all about Friday’s jobs report.
When it came out, the report was red-hot. Indeed, initial fears were that it was too hot. 528k new jobs were created in July, up from a revised gain of 398k in June, and more than double the expected 250k. The unemployment rate edged down from 3.6% to 3.5%, the lowest level in over half a century (recession? .. er, I don’t think so).
There were definite concerns that it showed that the Fed’s four interest-rate increases this year have so far done very little to dampen rampant labor demand. And buried deep within the report is the evidence of rapidly rising wages (average hourly earnings rose 0.5% last month alone) which can feed the beast of inflation, making it harder and more painful for the Fed to kill.
The more optimistic take, however, is that continued strength in hiring despite tightening monetary policy means the labor market will be able to withstand further rate hikes and buffer the economy against any downturn thereby protecting against a future recession. As a Harvard economist said on Friday: “Nice to see this many jobs added, but it is scary about what it means for the size of the adjustment we may have coming”.
In the end the markets just seemed dazed and confused all day on Friday, meandering around aimlessly to close mixed as attention now very much shifts to the massively impactful CPI and PPI numbers coming out this week.
“Not-as-bad-as-feared” data is no longer good enough to get stocks to bounce much further from the June lows. When the S&P 500 index (SPX) is at 4,140, it’s much harder to get a positive response from such fuzzy data than at SPX 3,670 which is where we were in mid-June.
Instead, we need actual, crystal-clear, positive data this week showing peaking inflation to avoid a stall in this rally, or maybe even a sharp reversion back towards the mid-June lows and possibly below if any kind of realization sets in that this whole July rally may just have been built on sand.
OTHER NEWS:
Things ain’t what they used to be .. Robinhood is slashing about 23% of its staff as the online brokerage continues to reel from a sharp slowdown in its customer trading activity. The job cuts mark the second round of layoffs this year at Robinhood, which in April got rid of about 9% of its full-time employees at the time. That’s over a thousand jobs eliminated in less than four months. The stock, which was at a high of 70.39 almost exactly a year ago, closed on Friday at 10.39 (I’ll save you the trouble of doing the calculation, that’s a fall of 85.2%).
Oil sliding .. The price of crude oil futures dropped below $90 per barrel last week, that’s lower than it was at the time Russia began its invasion of Ukraine. The latest drop comes after the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries(OPEC) and its allies said they would increase oil production by 100k barrels a day beginning next month. Prices are also falling as a result of the possibility of a global recession and concerns about how that could impact demand for oil.
Gas prices at the pump have fallen for over 50 straight days to an average of around $5.00 per gallon. That said, it's still a lot higher than at this time last year when the average price was $3.19.
Jolly not good .. The Bank of England (BOE) implemented its biggest interest rate rise in 27 years last week and issued a dire warning that the United Kingdom is set to fall into a possibly years-long recession. The monetary policy committee increased the base interest rate by half a percent to 1.75%, its sixth consecutive raise and the biggest single increase in interest rates since 1995, in an effort to control runaway inflation.
Even with these measures, the CPI measure of UK retail inflation is now forecast by the BOE to go above 13% by year-end, the worst level since Queen first briefed us that another one had bitten the dust in 1980.
While this was all being announced, lame-duck Prime Minister Boris Johnson decided to head off on vacation to an undisclosed location and Nadhim Zahawi, the interim Chancellor of the Exchequer (Brit-speak for Finance Minister or Treasury Secretary) who has been in the job for all of about four weeks and probably won’t be by this time next month, was also “working remotely” from somewhere. But, never fear, both were said to be staying right on top of things on WhatsApp. You can’t make this s**t up.
The country is typically a large component holding in any International Developed Market mutual fund or exchange traded fund (ETF).
UNDER THE HOOD:
Some technical analysts are starting to hone in on the S&P 500 (SPX) level of 4,231. If we break up through that level, that would mean that we will have retraced 50% of the index’s entire decline that began on January 4th. While in almost every bear market, there are often 20% retracements that ultimately fall apart and are subsequently followed by new lows, it is much more uncommon (though not unknown) for 50% retracements to fail in a similar fashion.
Having said that, it’s the job of every bear market rally to fool investors into believing that the bear market is over. This job gets harder and harder the lower the starting point of the upswing is and the rallies have to be made to look more and more convincing.
The comparative levels of Demand and Supply continue to move in the right direction with the measure of Demand stretching its advantage over that of supply. However, withdrawal of Supply appears to have been more responsible for this rather than a major expansion of Demand. This puts the onus on the buyers to step up if the current market advance is to develop into something more and they are not really showing a sign of that yet.
Another possible reason for skepticism in the current advance continues to be the lack of escalating volume that typically accompanies new bull markets. High volume is among the hallmarks of institutional accumulation. Last week, trading volume fell to its lowest level in over six months.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
A huge day coming up this week on Wednesday followed by a very big one on Thursday. Wednesday sees the release of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation for July. Expectations are for a 0.2% rise in the headline index and a 0.5% increase in the Core number. Then on Thursday, we get the release of the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation (raw materials for manufacturers) for July which is forecast to have risen 0.3% at the index level and 0.4% for the Core.
These are critical data releases as the recent market rally has essentially been based on an assumption that we are on the brink of seeing conclusive evidence that inflation has peaked. If such evidence is entirely absent, the stock market could have itself a big problem.
Second-quarter earnings season continues next week, including releases from Disney, AIG, Coinbase, BioNTech, Cardinal Health, Tyson Foods, Rivian, Fox Corp, Norwegian Cruise Lines, Illumina and Ralph Lauren.
The University of Michigan reports the August Consumer Sentiment Index this week, which has shown rapidly declining consumer optimism in recent months.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 30% (up from 28% the previous week)
→Neutral: 31% (down from 32% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 39% (down from 40% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 9 (Bearish by 12 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Tuesdays and Wednesdays
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Technology (two biggest holdings: Apple, Microsoft) - up 1.9%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - down 6.8%
The NASDAQ-100 solidly outperformed the S&P 500
US Markets again had a far better week than International Markets with Emerging Markets once again bringing up the rear
Large Cap edged Mid and Small Cap
Growth beat out Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 185 and rose by 11 points last week and that of US Market Selling Pressure is now at 156 and fell by 15 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but still below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 64. SPY ended the week 13.5% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF is above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but still below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 66. QQQ ended the week 20.4% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. Dr. Amazon will see you now.. A recent $3.9 billion purchase by Amazon could change the way healthcare is delivered (and priced!) in this country.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
FEDERAL RESERVE
The Federal Reserve System (FRS) is the central bank of the United States. Often simply called the Fed, it is arguably the most powerful financial institution in the world. It was founded to provide the country with a safe, flexible and stable monetary and financial system. The Fed has a board that is comprised of seven members. There are also 12 Federal Reserve banks with their own presidents that each represent a separate district (Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas and San Francisco).
A central bank is a financial institution given privileged control over the production and distribution of money and credit for a nation or a group of nations. In modern economies, the central bank is usually responsible for the formulation of monetary policy and the regulation of member banks.
The Fed was established by the Federal Reserve Act, which was signed by President Woodrow Wilson on December 23rd 1913, in response to a financial panic in 1907. Before that, the U.S. was the only major financial power without a central bank. Its creation was precipitated by repeated financial panics that afflicted the U.S. economy over the previous century, leading to severe economic disruptions due to bank failures and business bankruptcies. The crisis in 1907 led to calls for an institution that would prevent frequent panics and disruptions.
The Fed has broad power to act to ensure financial stability, and it is the primary regulator of banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System. It acts as the lender of last resort to member institutions that have no other place from which to borrow. It has the mandate to ensure there is financial stability in the system. It is also the main regulator of the country's financial institutions.
The monetary policy goals of the Federal Reserve are twofold: to foster economic conditions that achieve stable prices and maximum sustainable employment.
The Fed's duties can be further categorized into four general areas:
Conducting national monetary policy by influencing monetary and credit conditions in the U.S. economy to ensure maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.
Supervising and regulating banking institutions to ensure the safety of the U.S. banking and financial system and to protect consumers' credit rights.
Maintaining financial system stability and containing systemic risk.
Providing financial services, including a pivotal role in operating the national payments system, depository institutions, the U.S. government, and foreign official institutions.
The Fed has an implicit target rate of inflation of 2%. The principle of inflation targeting is based on the belief that long-term economic growth is best achieved by maintaining price stability, and price stability is achieved by controlling inflation.
Inflation levels of 1% to 2% per year are generally considered acceptable, while inflation rates greater than 3% represent a dangerous zone that could cause the currency to become devalued. The Taylor rule is an econometric model that says the Federal Reserve should raise interest rates when inflation or gross domestic product (GDP) growth rates are higher than desired.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them and making any use of information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
(Slightly longer report than usual this time around, but last week was a doozy)
Last week’s big story was always supposed to be the Fed’s interest rate hike on Wednesday but in the end, that proved to be rather uneventful and lacked any kind of a wow moment. The surprise-averse stock market absolutely loved that.
But what really generated a huge amount of heat but precious little light was the often hyperbolic, ill-informed and sometimes blatantly politically motivated media reaction to the preliminary estimate of Q2 2022 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on Thursday. Who knew that the release of a Q2 GDP initial estimate could generate such passion and vitriol?
The week began with an indecisive, meandering session on Monday, but after the close, retail juggernaut Walmart (WMT) shocked the market. It’s been staring us in the face for weeks, if not months. But it took Walmart to announce it, that higher prices for food and fuel were forcing shoppers to hold back on other items and that its previous outlook and guidance for Q2 and the full year was very wrong and needed to be meaningfully changed (and not in a good way), to really make investors realize: Inflation is now finally starting to cause a real demand problem in the US economy.
Supply shortage has become overstocking. And if the biggest US retailer is feeling it so badly, then who else can possibly escape the pain? Walmart stores have too many unsold items and it is going to have to slash prices to reduce its merchandise inventory levels. The stock crapped out nearly 10% in after-hours trading on Monday before making up some ground later in the week.
The announcement and its implications and aftermath sent a shiver through the whole market when things opened on Tuesday morning. All the giddy, boisterous optimism of the week before was sucked out of the atmosphere as investors apprehensively approached hugely significant earnings from the big guns, the Fed interest rate decision and the initial Q2 GDP print.
A less-hawkish-than-feared, yet still inflation-fighting-focused, Federal Reserve doing what was expected was precisely what markets wanted to see on Wednesday and they got it. The central bank duly raised interest rates by 0.75% for the second time in as many months. The Fed Funds rate now stands at a target range of 2.25% to 2.50%. During his press conference Fed Chairman Jerome Powell emphasized the Fed’s commitment to restoring price stability and said failing isn’t an option. Another 0.75% hike might be necessary at the Fed’s next meeting in late September, he said, but there is a lot of time and a lot of data releases between now and then.
He essentially acknowledged a slowing economy while still emphasizing that inflation was unacceptably high. That combination seemed to thread the needle perfectly as far as the stock market was concerned. The Fed isn't giving up the fight against inflation, but it isn't flagrantly driving the economy into a recession either. Stocks were unable to find any negativity and rallied hard after the decision was announced, pushing even higher during Powell’s presser.
Two back-to-back quarters of negative growth as measured by GDP is often considered as a common rule of thumb that a recession is underway, but actually this is just table stakes for a recession declaration.
The group of eight economists at the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) who get to officially call it also evaluates a range of other indicators such as retail sales, personal income and consumption, manufacturing output and, very importantly, the labor market in reaching their conclusion and the process has always been fuzzy. Its official mandate does not even mention GDP or two consecutive quarters; “The determination of the months of peaks and troughs is based on a range of monthly measures of aggregate real economic activity published by the federal statistical agencies”.
As I have mentioned in a previous report, they consider their audience to be future economic historians and statisticians in three, five, twenty or a hundred years’ time looking back on long-ago recessions. They are absolutely not into producing real-time information for use by hedge funds, day-traders, black box algorithm designers, CNBC pundits or opportunistic party political snipers.
It was announced on Thursday that the initial estimate for quarterly GDP for Q2 2022 was -0.9% following the final estimate for Q1 of -1.6%, which inevitably led to many squealing media outlets confidently announcing an official recession based on the “two consecutive quarters” misapprehension.
Let me be clear, even if we do end up with two consecutive quarters of negative GDP prints even after two more revisions for Q2, the US economy was very clearly not contracting in either quarter in 2022, and is right now not (yet) in a recession. How can I say that with such confidence?
First, drawing any conclusions from Thursday’s GDP report is premature and risks making one look foolish. A final quarterly GDP number actually comes in a process of three incremental reports over a period of many weeks which can change dramatically from report to report as more data becomes available. The number on the third report is deemed to be the official figure for that quarter. What came out last Thursday was just the first estimate of the three for Q2 which is based on the least amount of data and will doubtless be heavily revised on two separate occasions in the coming weeks.
Second, the main (some would argue “only”) reason US GDP showed as negative in Q1 was because of inventory builds and imports. Remember, GDP was created to measure the “net output” of the US economy, so anything imported is deemed to subtract from US economic output (GDP was created in a very different global economy). It was the statistical influence of the inventory builds and imports (also spurred by a strong dollar) that pushed Q1 GDP into negative territory.
The fact is that Americans spent money like water in the first half of the year and that the US economy grew solidly in Q1 according to any and all measures of consumer spending (which rose 1.8% in Q1 and followed that up with another 1.0% increase in Q2) and consumption as well as ridiculously buoyant labor market data.
Third, Q2 2022 saw retail sales, durable goods spending, personal consumption, consumer and business spending and investment all move higher again. US corporate earnings handily beat estimates most of the time. Most importantly, the economy has added 2.75 million jobs since New Years’ Day and the unemployment rate has remained steady at a historically low rate of around 3.6% all year.
You cannot be experiencing a recession while the economy is sporting those kind of numbers, no matter what GDP estimates say.
While Thursday’s GDP numbers were no good at all to anyone trying to draw a real-time conclusion about where the economy is at, they were really, really good for lazy headline writers and those looking to whip up hysteria for either investor attention, social media eyeballs or party political point-scoring. And that was what was responsible for so much of the nonsense that we saw and read on Thursday and Friday and into the weekend.
Much of Big Tech announced Q2 earnings and forward guidance during the week and the aggregate outcome was probably a 6.5 out of 10. Alphabet/Google, Amazon, Apple, Meta/Facebook and Microsoft haven't been as unstoppable this year as investors have gotten used to seeing over the past decade but their combined weight of close to 25% of the S&P 500 still means that their results matter for the broader market. Collectively, they brought in a total of $354 billion in revenue in Q2, with Amazon and Apple probably happiest with their results and Meta/Facebook, not so much.
To come full circle, we are not in a recession whatever the economist wonks, CNN or Fox News say, nor have we been in one at any time in 2022. But (big but!) what the Walmart announcement finally brought home to everyone last week is that the current level of inflation is starting to prove so damaging that, for all our sakes, it needs to be dealt with absolutely ruthlessly by the Fed.
If not, the next few months could become an economic st show. Remember, the current stock market rally that has seen the S&P 500 rise by over 9% and the NASDAQ-100 by over 12.5% in July has been entirely underwritten by an assumption that inflation has peaked. If this is not borne out by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) data to be released on August 10th (mark it in your diary!), then “look out below” is all I can say for stock prices.
OTHER NEWS:
Elon being Elon .. Life just keeps throwing curveballs at poor old Elon Musk. Tesla (TSLA) reported last week that it has received a second subpoena from federal regulators concerning CEO Elon Musk’s 2018 tweet in which he falsely claimed he had secured financing to take the electric carmaker private thereby misleading investors. Later in 2018, the company and Musk settled a lawsuit brought by regulators over the tweet and he accepted a $40 million fine and the requirement that he step down as chairman of Tesla. A federal judge in April this year tossed out Musk’s sudden request to scrap the settlement. He is appealing that ruling.
Musk seems to enjoy a sudden U-turn as shown by the Twitter fiasco which is still ongoing. SpaceX staff are continuing to make it clear to anyone who’ll listen that their founder is “a source of embarrassment and distraction” and presides over a toxic culture at the company which, they say, is infested with rampant sexual harassment.
It emerged recently that Musk added kids #7 and #8 to his roster with the birth of twins late last year by an executive at one of his companies, just four months before #9 came along with his partner Grimes. He is still facing claims that he sexually harassed a flight attendant on his private jet in 2016 and then paid her $250k for her silence in 2018.
Then last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that, about three weeks after the birth of #7 and #8 but about three months before the birth of #9, Musk had a liaison last December with the wife of his former close friend, the Google co-founder Sergey Brin, that prompted Brin to file for divorce in January of this year.
There’s little doubt that Musk’s increasingly erratic behavior and casual relationship with both regulatory and social norms is starting to negatively affect the mindset of those who may be otherwise considering investing in companies with which he has any involvement which can ultimately filter through to their stock prices. Interestingly, last week was the first full week of trading for the exchange traded fund TSLQ which delivers the inverse of the daily performance of Tesla (TSLA) stock and it attracted investor attention.
Global gloom .. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) cut its global growth forecast for 2023 from 3.6% in April to just 2.9% this month, and said the world is “teetering on the edge of a recession”.
Still rising fast, but at a slower rate .. US overall home prices in May were 19.7% higher compared with the same month last year, according to the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller National Home Price Index. This marks the second month of slower increases, as the housing market cools due to higher mortgage rates and increasing concerns over inflation. In April, the annual gain was 20.6%.
The Twenty City Composite Index increased 20.5%, down from 21.2% in April. Cities seeing the strongest gains were Tampa, Florida, Miami and Dallas, with annual increases of 36.1%, 34% and 30.8%, respectively. Only four of the twenty cities continued to report higher price increases in the twelve months that ended in May versus the twelve month period that ended in April. In February of this year, all twenty cities in the survey were seeing increasing annual gains.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Following the S&P 500’s best July since 1939, SPX (the S&P 500 index price) 4100 is starting to look like the new SPX 3800. If Friday’s breach of SPX 4100 can be maintained, it is going to start to pull in the significant community of professional and institutional investors who follow the practice of trend analysis (see “FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK”, below) and who have been largely absent from buying stocks in 2022. One thing about trend-following in stocks is that it can be self-fulfilling as these investors have a tendency to pile in once they have identified a trend shift and this, of itself, accelerates that shift.
No doubt, the investing environment has improved (to the extent that the market is now likely short term overbought), and several core indicators have gained significant ground in the past two weeks, including the important net spread between Buying Power and Selling Pressure, which shifted in favor of Buying Power on Friday (more as a result of a large decline in selling than a burst in buying).
Unfortunately, while many readings are undoubtedly heading in the right direction, none are quite yet where they need to be to create a truly inviting investing environment. It is important to keep in mind that some had recorded multi-year negative lows as recently as just two or three weeks ago.
Also it is important to recognize that the three lowest volume New York Stock Exchange trading days of 2022 to-date have occurred in July during this recent market recovery. These days’ volumes were even lower than any pre-holiday trading on the days before market closures on Memorial Day and July 4th this year and are therefore more significant than traditional summer slowdowns. As discussed in last week’s review, abnormally low volume suggests a lack of conviction.
Maybe I am like a tough crowd at a comedy club that takes a lot of convincing but, while certainly acknowledging a meaningful improvement in many of the under the hood market conditions, my view of the overall body of technical data is still somewhat curbing my enthusiasm.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
It's the peak stretch of second-quarter earnings season, with about 150 S&P 500 firms scheduled to report this week including Starbucks, CVS, Uber, Advanced Micro Devices, AirBNB, Caterpillar, Paypal, Alibaba, Block/Square, Moderna, Occidental Petroleum, Devon Energy, EBay, Paramount, Caterpillar, Marriott, ConocoPhillips, Warner Bros, Simon Property Group and Electronic Arts.
The highlight of the week, however, will be the Bureau of Labor Statistics' jobs report for July before the market open on Friday morning. Economists' consensus calls are for growth of 250,000 more jobs and for the unemployment rate to remain at 3.6%.
Other economic data out next week will include July’s Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) on Monday, followed by the Services PMI on Wednesday. Both measures of activity are seen as declining from June.
On Thursday, the Bank of England will announce a monetary policy decision. An interest rate hike is considered likely.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 28% (down from 30% the previous week)
→Neutral: 32% (up from 28% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 40% (down from 42% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 12 (Bearish by 12 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Sentiment survey participants are usually polled on Wednesdays
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 10.7%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Communications Services (two biggest holdings: Meta/Facebook, Alphabet/Google) - up 0.7%
The NASDAQ-100 and the S&P 500 showed almost identical performance last week
US Markets had a far better week than International Markets with Emerging Markets once again bringing up the rear
There was barely any difference in performance last week between Large, Mid and Small Cap
Growth beat Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 174 and rose by 5 points last week and into a dominant position over that of US Market Selling Pressure which is now at 171 and fell by 14 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is now above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but still below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 66. SPY ended the week 13.8% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF is now above both its 50-day and 90-day moving averages but still below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 64. QQQ ended the week 21.9% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. Investing a lump sum when the market is down brings up a lot of issues including that of possible future regret minimization. There’s no one right answer - well, actually there is. But that may not be the way you want to go.
EXPLAINER: FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
TREND ANALYSIS
Trend analysis is a technique used in technical analysis that attempts to predict future stock price movements based on recently observed trend data. Trend analysis uses historical data, such as price movements and trade volume, to forecast the long-term direction of market sentiment.
Trend analysis tries to predict a trend, such as a bull market run, and ride that trend until data suggests a trend reversal, such as a bull-to-bear market. Trend analysis is helpful because moving with trends, and not against them, will lead to profit for an investor. It is based on the idea that what has happened in the past gives traders an idea of what will happen in the future. There are three main types of trends: short-, intermediate- and long-term.
A trend is a general direction the market is taking during a specified period of time. Trends can be both upward and downward, relating to bullish and bearish markets, respectively. While there is no specified minimum amount of time required for a direction to be considered a trend, the longer the direction is maintained, the more notable the trend.
Trend analysis is the process of looking at current trends in order to predict future ones and is considered a form of comparative analysis. This can include attempting to determine whether a current market trend, such as gains in a particular market sector, is likely to continue, as well as whether a trend in one market area could result in a trend in another. Though a trend analysis may involve a large amount of data, there is no guarantee that the results will be correct.
In order to begin analyzing applicable data, it is necessary to first determine which market segment will be analyzed. For instance, you could focus on a particular industry, such as the automotive or pharmaceuticals sector, as well as a particular type of investment, such as the bond market.
Once the sector has been selected, it is possible to examine its general performance. This can include how the sector was affected by internal and external forces. For example, changes in a similar industry or the creation of a new governmental regulation would qualify as forces impacting the market. Analysts then take this data and attempt to predict the direction the market will take moving forward.
Critics of trend analysis, and technical trading in general, argue that markets are efficient, and already price in all available information. That means that history does not necessarily need to repeat itself and that the past does not predict the future. Adherents of fundamental analysis, for example, analyze the financial condition of companies using financial statements and economic models to predict future prices. For these types of investors, day-to-day stock movements follow a random walk that cannot be interpreted as patterns or trends.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | SIMON@ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Markets seem to have firmly seized onto the hope that we are now close to 1) peak inflation, 2) peak Fed hawkishness and, as a result of the first two, 3) peak US dollar strength. The result was a very solid week for most stocks (with the occasional notable exception, like SNAP which collapsed nearly 40% on Friday alone after terrible sales growth numbers).
But hope combined with some favorable readings from some frankly second-tier data points isn’t usually enough to cause such a substantial bounce (or at least the most substantial one we’ve seen in a few months). However, this particular rally has been spiced up, despite its lack of actual fundamental progress, by one ingredient: prevailing extreme pessimism.
Bank of America investor sentiment data released last week showed:
Recession expectations are the highest since the pandemic and before that the 2008 financial crisis
Stock allocations are at their lowest level since 2008
Cash holdings are at their highest level since 2001
Growth and profit expectations are at all-time lows
Investors are demonstrating the most risk-averse behavior since October 2008
In the eyes of those who follow the “it’s always darkest just before the dawn” narrative, such catastrophic sentiment data heralds the beginning of the transition from bear to bull as it brings up the exciting prospect of the C-word. Capitulation.
Capitulation is often a necessary staging post on the way to a sustainable recovery as sellers exhaust themselves and buyers throw in the towel. But while the evidence shown above might imply this, the Under The Hood data (see below) seem to show that capitulation is apparently not yet upon us, so caution is required.
Volatility always shows up at pivotal market turns but volatility itself is not a signal of that turn. This is a mistake many investors make, using volatility as confirmation bias because they so desperately want the bear market to be over and get back to making easy money again.
And it also needs to be remembered that, from an economic and corporate earnings standpoint, we have not even really started to feel the impact of the soon-to-be full 2.0% of interest rate increases that’s occurred since March.
A strengthening US dollar makes exported goods more expensive overseas and foreign imports cheaper in the US, a double-whammy that punches US exporting corporations in the face since it is estimated that about 40% of the average S&P 500 company’s earnings come from outside the US.
The dollar finally showed signs of topping out last week (partly caused by increasing interest rates in Europe and the Far East), but is still up 17% from a year ago. That means that total S&P 500 company earnings have been reduced by about 6.8% over the course of the last year simply as a result of currency movements. If there is a sustainable turn and the value of the dollar flattens out or even turns down, it will definitely be helpful from this standpoint.
Early in the week, we saw both Apple (AAPL) and Goldman Sachs (GS) announcing plans to slow hiring next year. Goldman Sachs also said that second-quarter earnings fell 47%. Bank of America’s second-quarter profit fell 32% but revenue rose on strong consumer spending and borrowing.
The National Association of Home Builders Housing Market Index (see “FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK” below) unexpectedly crashed by 12 points from 67 in June to just 55 in July. It was the second-largest drop on record and served as a reminder that certain parts of the economy are really beginning to feel the impacts of the Fed’s aggressive policy stance and many buyers have been completely priced out of the market by the simultaneous rapid rise of home prices and mortgage rates. It was noted that many builders have stopped work on projects because the costs for land, construction, and financing were more than the value of the homes being built.
The median existing home price hit another record in June, rising to $416k, up 13.4% from the previous year and increasing from a revised $408k in May. Home sales declined for the fifth straight month. Sales of previously-owned homes fell 5.4% in June from the prior month to the weakest rate since mid-2020. There were 14.2% fewer sales of previously-owned homes last month than there were a year ago.
But stock indexes powered through all these potential headwinds, firm in their apparent new-found conviction in the peak inflation / peak Fed hawkishness / peak US dollar strength theory and given its extra spicy thrust by idea that the awful pessimism among consumers simply can’t get much worse.
Enjoy the rally, goodness knows we all deserve it. But don’t treat it as a bottom yet. There’s no definitive proof that this bear has been vanquished (see “UNDER THE HOOD” below). Remember, if this really is the start of a new uptrend it will, by definition, have legs and provide you with ample opportunities to get on board. But if it suddenly becomes clear this is indeed just another knee-jerk reaction to outside events in an oversold market, the drop to new lows could be swift and painful.
But I want to emphasize that, when it comes to accounts with longer-term time horizons (say, about twelve to fifteen years or more), none of this timing or sizing stuff or determining if we are at the bottom yet matters at all. Just keep on systematically buying the right kind of equity exchange traded funds (ETFs) and younger investors (say, forty years old and younger) should lean into this in their various retirement and very long term accounts and actually step up their level of buying if cash flow allows.
OTHER NEWS:
European energy crisis looming? .. Russian energy provider Gazprom last week declared a force majeure for gas supplies to Europe via its Nord Stream 1 pipeline. The company said it could no longer guarantee meeting its contractual obligations due to "extraordinary circumstances beyond its control." before backing off later in the week. But the issue of European use of Russian energy has the capacity to be a very big deal. The development drove energy prices higher, pointing to possibly severe European supply chain disruption and consequent higher inflation growth in the region down the road if Russia continues to hold much of Europe to ransom and the Ukraine war goes on and on.
While Europe bakes in record-breaking heat in July it’s easy to make all the right noises about cutting back on buying energy from Russia. This will be far from the case in six months’ time when large numbers of the continental European population will be freezing in their homes unable to pay their energy bills, possibly facing power cuts or rationing. Germany is apparently already preemptively dimming the brightness of its street lights as an energy-saving measure.
Crypto fraud arrests .. A former employee at popular crypto exchange Coinbase (COIN) and two other men were charged with wire fraud on Thursday in what federal prosecutors called the first insider-trading case involving crypto-currency markets. A indictment unsealed in federal court in Manhattan charged Ishan Wahi, a former product manager at Coinbase, his brother Nikhil Wahi and friend Sameer Ramani with wire fraud and wire fraud conspiracy in what prosecutors described as a scheme to commit insider trading by accessing and abusing confidential Coinbase customer information. More detail here.
UNDER THE HOOD:
Tuesday’s big, broad rally carried most indexes above their 50-day moving averages, which is potentially a good little baby step towards the blue skies investors have been craving. However, a little cold water needs to be poured on the giddy, over-optimistic nonsense that I saw, heard and read at times last week (see my “ARTICLE OF THE WEEK” for more about the charlatans who peddle this st, and - yes - they are still charlatans and it is still st even if these unlikely scenarios actually somehow come to pass).
As the major price indexes rally, trading volume is meaningfully contracting. In traditional technical analysis, rising prices on falling volume implies waning power in an uptrend. Higher volatility with lower volume suggests that the market is simply churning, rather than creating a meaningful switch from bear to bull.
The Percent of Stocks 30% or More Below One Year Highs represents the universe of the most beaten-down stocks and is theoretically where the bargains lie. It should be among the first indicators to substantially improve (meaning, in this case, to go substantially lower) at the time of a genuine turnaround. That this indicator reached a fresh new high as recently as July 14 and still remains in an upward trend even as the indexes proceeded to then bounce nicely is a sign that the Demand driving the gains is selective.
In other words, bargain hunters are still absent and that further suggests a lack of risk-taking among the purchases being made. As I have emphasized in recent reports, at the start of sustainable new turnaround advances after significant declines, the surge in buying typically carries every corner of the market higher at the same time and that just isn’t happening yet.
While the current rally could persist a while longer, it does not so far possess the ingredients that typically yield new emerging bull markets.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
THIS WEEK’S UPCOMING CALENDAR ..
It will be a very busy week on both the micro and macro fronts.
Q2 2022 earnings season ramps up big time next week, as more than 150 S&P 500 firms will report - including all five of the big tech names. Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet/Google, Amazon, Meta/Facebook, Pfizer, Intel, Mastercard, Visa, Exxon Mobil, Coca-Cola, McDonalds, Procter & Gamble, UPS, Boeing, General Electric, Chevron, Chipotle, Honeywell, Qualcomm, Ford, T-Mobile, Etsy, Spotify, Whirlpool and Newmont Mining to name but a few.
Mark your calendars for the big event of the week around 2pm ET on Wednesday when the waiting will finally come to an end and we find out whether the Fed raises interest rates by three-quarters of a percent or a full percentage point at the end of its two-day meeting (my money is on them raising by three-quarters of a point). I am sure you are all as excited as I am to find out!
Other, far less spectacular, economic data out next week will include the National Home Price Index, the preliminary Durable Goods report, personal income and spending data, the Consumer Confidence Index and the first estimate (to be further updated twice in the coming weeks) for Q2 2022 gross domestic product (GDP).
Finally, the Fed's preferred measure of inflation, the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (Core PCE) price index comes out a couple of days after they make their interest rate call on Wednesday.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 30% (up from 27% the previous week)
→Neutral: 28% (up from 27% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 42% (down from 46% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 12 (Bearish by 19 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Cyclical (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 7.0%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Duke Energy) - down 0.5%
The NASDAQ-100 outperformed the S&P 500
International Developed Markets had a better week than US Markets with Emerging Markets bringing up the rear
Repeat of last week with Mid Cap eking out another unusual narrow win over Large and Small Cap
Growth beat Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 169 and rose by 12 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure is at 185 and fell by 22 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, is now above its 50-day moving average but below its 90-day and also below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 56. SPY ended the week 17.4% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is now above its 50-day moving average but below its 90-day and also below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 57. QQQ ended the week 25.3% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. As the obnoxious “I told you so-ers” are frantically rewriting their histories and retro-fitting their previous views to the current market conditions in preparation for taking entirely unjustified victory laps as soon as they possibly can, it’s important to frequently remind ourselves that There Will Always Be Sorcerers.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS HOUSING MARKET INDEX
The NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) is a monthly sentiment survey of members of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). The index measures sentiment among builders of U.S. single-family homes, and is a widely watched gauge of the U.S. housing sector. Since housing represents is a large capital investment and spurs additional consumer spending on appliances and furnishings, housing market indices help to monitor the overall health of the economy.
The National Association of Home Builders is a federation of more than 700 state and local associations with 140,000 members. About one-third are home builders and remodelers, and the rest professionals from related fields such as mortgage finance and building materials supply. NAHB builders account for some 80% of the new homes built in the U.S.
Since 1985, the HMI has been based on a monthly survey completed by NAHB builders, which was generating some 400 responses as of 2007. In completing the survey, builders rate housing market conditions and outlook based on their recent experience.
The HMI is a weighted average of three factors (present sales, future sales and traffic), designed to range from 0 to 100. HMI readings above 50 reflect a generally favorable market view and outlook in the industry.
It fell to a record low of 8 in January 2009, and set a record high of 90 in November 2020. Last week’s reading was 55.
The index displays a close correlation with U.S. single-family housing starts, which measure the number of privately-owned homes on which construction started in a given month. Housing starts are a key economic indicator and the report is supplied monthly by the U.S. Census Bureau.
As a gauge of home builder sentiment, the HMI provides valuable clues on the near-term direction of housing starts. It is released at 10am ET typically on the 11th business day of the month, which is the day before the housing starts data are released by the Census Bureau.
The HMI has historically closely tracked housing starts and building permits. Its complete recovery from the depths of the 2008-2009 global financial crisis has outpaced the rebound in housing starts, however.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Get ready for an avalanche of recession warnings across all media platforms. That's the conclusion from last week’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) report, as inflation hit yet another 40 year high which almost guarantees that the Fed announces on July 27th that it will raise interest rates by at least another 0.75%, putting even more pressure on the economy.
Indeed, after the Bank of Canada last week hiked interest rates by 1.0%, by Wednesday evening US bond futures markets were pointing to a 78% probability of a full 1.0% raise by the Fed at that next meeting.
“Peak Hawkishness/Peak Inflation” is pretty much the first key to a potential stock and bond market bottom and a visibly declining CPI is the “proof” the Fed needs to believe that we’ve past peak inflation and that they can ease up somewhat. We are now going to have to wait at the very least another month before getting there, although every move higher does increase the hope among the optimists that the next time will finally be the data release that shows a peak has been reached.
The optimists’ case around the hot CPI report is:
admittedly, inflation hasn’t peaked yet but they are hopeful that it’ll peak very soon (next month?) as recent falling commodity prices start to make themselves felt in the data
the Fed won’t hike to a final level any higher than currently expected (it may hike faster, but the end result should be the same) and it will “stop” at around 3.50% by year end
that the slowing economy will stop the Fed from “going too crazy” with rate hikes later in 2022 or early 2023, and in a year or so we’ll actually be talking about rate cuts.
However, in my view, here's the bottom line: There was nothing in Wednesday’s report that even hinted at the fact that inflation has yet peaked and the peak inflation narrative was proved wrong again for the third month in a row. It may well show a lower headline rate in a month’s time but even a peaked inflation rate will still be very, very high. Interest rates are still going higher and will definitely continue to do so.
The idea that the Fed will automatically stop raising rates simply because it hits 3.50% by the end of the year seems illogical to me. The Fed has said that it will fight inflation to the death, not just knock it down by a percentage point or two, using interest rate hikes as its weapon and is prepared to plunge the economy into recession if need be to accomplish this. In my view, there’s nothing magical about a Fed Funds rate of 3.50% that will, of itself, give the Fed pause at year end.
Endless recession warnings and predictions will keep pouring out of all media outlets. All of this could well lead to continued volatility in the days, weeks, or even months ahead. Stay strong. You all know my advice. If not, call me and I’ll share it. Also see the “ARTICLE OF THE WEEK” below.
The week had gotten off to a rocky start on Monday as we learned that Macau will close down most businesses, including shuttering all its casinos, for at least one week following a COVID outbreak - while Shanghai will continue with massive testing in what is a signal that China’s Zero COVID policy is still very much in effect.
There was then mostly confusion and nervousness in relatively low volume stock markets ahead of Wednesday’s CPI report and early Q2 earnings announcements. Markets tumbled late on Tuesday after a fake news report on the open sewer that is Twitter claiming to be an early leak of the CPI inflation data due the following day (showing a 10.2% annual rate of inflation) got such traction that the US Bureau of Labor Statistics was forced to come out and announce that it was a forgery. But by then the tweet had already triggered some program selling and had spooked a good number of traders.
When reality hit on Wednesday morning, we saw that CPI had in fact surged 9.1% from last year, up from the 8.6% rate in May and a lot more than the 8.7% increase analysts had expected. This was the highest annual inflation print since November 1981. The Core Rate, that excludes food and energy, rose 5.9% from a year ago, slowing fractionally from May's 6.0% increase. Analysts had expected a 5.7% increase.
For the month of June only:
overall inflation was up 1.3%, the highest monthly increase since Green Day strolled down the Boulevard of Broken Dreams in 2005
energy inflation was up 7.5% (41.5% year-on-year)
inflation (without energy) was up 0.7% (6.6% year-on-year)
inflation in used cars and trucks was up 1.6%
inflation in rents was up 0.8%, the highest since The Pet Shop Boys first sung about hanging out with West End girls in 1986
owners’ equivalent rent, a CPI euphemism for house prices, was up 0.7%
As a result, real (inflation-adjusted) wages got crushed in June. They are down 2.9% from April 2021, and down 3.6% from December 2020. The average worker is taking real pay cuts. Wholesale inflation numbers (raw material costs to manufacturers as shown by the Producer Price Index - PPI) provided no relief when they were released last week, these prices are up 11.3% year-on-year.
JP Morgan Chase (JPM) and Morgan Stanley (MS) fell hard on Thursday, taking most of the financial sector with them, after both suffered big declines in their investment banking businesses but market-volatility boosts to their trading operations. JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon warned about a potential economic slowdown.
Consider that, on just Wednesday and Thursday alone, investors were hit with ..
Much-hotter-than-expected inflation reports - both CPI and PPI,
The openly-discussed possibility of a full 1.0% rate hike later this month,
Highly underwhelming earnings from market giants (JPM & MS) and
Increased turmoil in Europe (political machinations in both Italy and the UK as well as continued ugly developments in the conflict in Ukraine),
.. yet the S&P 500 finished the week higher than where it closed on Tuesday (although still down for the week as a whole). On the face of it, that resilient performance was impressive and certainly better than some of the relentless declines that we saw in April, May and June. It would seem that this degree of bad news has been already priced into the S&P 500, which remains in the previously-identified range pivoting either side of SPX 3800.
However, what is not yet priced in is the scenario of a serious economic slowdown in an environment of falling corporate earnings and that is where the risk lies, with the potential to drive prices down another 10%-20% or more. This could explain the lack of broad buying sentiment discussed in “Under The Hood” below.
Having said that, stocks did stage an impressive rally on Friday, partly due to a strong, but not-too-strong, retail sales report and the market processing the University of Michigan’s preliminary estimate of its closely-watched Consumer Sentiment Index (see “FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK” below) that ticked higher to 51.1 from last month’s record low of 50.0. It was only the second time this year that the index has advanced and consumers’ pessimism about future inflation levels also eased somewhat. The Fed likes to see things like that.
Other News:
Great news for international travelers who are bad at math .. After last week’s foreign exchange market activity, one Euro is now essentially the same as one dollar.
Buyers pulling out .. Housing market deals are falling through at the fastest clip in two years, as home buyers are using a slowing market to try to renegotiate. In addition, buyers are backing out because higher mortgage rates mean they can no longer afford the home they agreed to buy. Roughly 60,000 home-purchase agreements across the country in June (almost one in seven of the total number homes that went under contract), fell through.
The desperate buyers of earlier this year were waiving inspections and appraisals as a tactic to jump the line and get the property they wanted. Now they are increasingly keeping these contingencies rather than waiving them. which can give them the flexibility to call the deal off later.
Crypto-world just keeps on getting rocked .. Major cryptocurrency prices sank again midweek, with the price of Bitcoin falling back below $20,000 again as things just got more and more toxic in the crypto ecosystem. The present whereabouts of the founders of the now-dissolved crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital are apparently unknown, suggesting that they may well now be on the run. Like 1920’s gangsters and bank robbers.
Elsewhere, crypto lenders Celsius and Voyager Digital, who each froze customer withdrawals recently, both entered bankruptcy last week and all their customers are now vulnerable to being completely wiped out as they are deemed to be only unsecured creditors in the bankruptcy process. Coinbase’s stock price is now down 87% from its high just last November. Just sayin’.
Under The Hood:
Last week saw a new multi-month low in Buying Power AND a new multi-month high in Selling Pressure. Half of all stocks are now 30% or more below their one year highs. A year ago, that number was less than 10% of stocks. Even just six weeks ago, it was down around 30%. This all demonstrates a distinct lack of interest on the part of potential buyers to get sustainably involved at these price levels. Historically, the only way the required level of interest has developed is for stock prices to go even lower to finally attract enough indiscriminate buying.
The reaction of buyers to recent oversold conditions continues to disappoint and it has become increasingly clear that there is simply not enough interest in stocks at these price levels for a sustainable rally to begin. The mass scooping up of bargains will likely have to wait until prices fall further. Remember, shorter term investors can lose a lot more money turning prematurely bullish in a bear market than they do in the steep, early declines. There’s a really good chance that Friday’s solid-looking rally could well just be another in a long line of bear traps.
Interestingly for those fans of the “complete COVID round-trip” theory (that all the gains since February 2020 need to be erased before things can finally turn around), the closely-watched S&P 500 200-day moving average is now closely lined up with the pre-Feb 2020 high of around 3400 in the SPX. Some technical analysts believe that, at the very least, this has the potential to provide quite a hard-floor level of support if we get down there (SPX closed on Friday at 3863).
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
Q2 2022 earnings will continue to emerge this week, with roughly 70 S&P 500 firms scheduled to report. Among the highlights will be Netflix, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, American Express, IBM, Verizon, Johnson & Johnson, AT&T, Dow, Snap, Lockheed Martin, United Airlines, American Airlines, Freeport-McMoRan and, interestingly, both Tesla and Twitter.
Overseas, while the Bank of Japan is expected to keep its target interest rate unchanged, the European Central Bank is expected to raise its key interest rate by a quarter of a percent, from negative 0.5% to negative 0.25%. The US Federal Reserve's next monetary policy meeting will take place on July 26-27.
In the world of real estate, the National Association of Home Builders will release its housing market index for July, followed by the Census Bureau's new residential construction statistics for June and the National Association of Realtors' existing-home sales for June.
Finally, the Conference Board will release its leading economic index for June and S&P Global will release both its manufacturing and services purchasing managers’ indexes for July.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 27% (up from 19% the previous week)
→Neutral: 27% (down from 28% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 46% (down from 53% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 19 (Bearish by 34 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Net Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Staples (two biggest holdings: Proctor & Gamble, Coca-Cola) - down 0.1%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) for the third week in a row - down 3.3%
The S&P 500 did a little better than the NASDAQ-100
US Markets and International Developed Markets did far less badly than Emerging Markets
Not much in it but Mid Cap eked out a rare narrow win over Large and Small Cap
Value strongly outperformed Growth
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 157 and fell by 1 point last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure is at 207 and also fell by 1 point over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is still well below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains far below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 42. SPY ended the week 19.4% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 47. QQQ ended the week 27.8% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. In his Pep Talk, Jonathan Clements reminds us not to do anything stupid with a portfolio in these conditions and to focus on four things: expectations, history, intrinsic value, and most importantly, time horizon. “This is where savvy investors get their edge. It’s tough to outsmart other investors. But we can play a different game – by focusing not on next week but on the next 10 years.” And that’s what good investors do. They endure.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
MICHIGAN CONSUMER SENTIMENT INDEX (MCSI)
The Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index (MCSI) is a monthly survey of consumer confidence levels in the United States conducted by the University of Michigan. The survey is based on telephone interviews that gather information on consumer expectations for the economy.
Consumer sentiment is a statistical measurement of the overall health of the economy as determined by consumer opinion. It takes into account people's feelings toward their current financial health, the health of the economy in the short term, and the prospects for longer-term economic growth, and is widely considered to be a useful economic indicator.
It was created in the 1940s by Professor George Katona at the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research. His efforts ultimately led to a national telephone survey conducted and published monthly by the university. The survey queries consumers on their views of their own personal finances, as well as the short-term and long-term state of the U.S. economy.
The preliminary report is generally released during the middle of the month and covers survey responses collected in the first two weeks of the month. The final report is released at the end of the month and covers the full month. It is designed to capture the mood of American consumers. Whether the sentiment is optimistic, pessimistic, or neutral, the survey signals information about near-term consumer spending plans.
Because consumer spending accounts for about 68.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) in the US, the MCSI is regarded as one of many important economic indicators followed by businesses, policymakers, and participants in the investment community.
Each month, the university conducts a minimum of 500 phone interviews across the continental U.S. The survey asks 50 core questions and covers three areas: personal finances, business conditions, and buying conditions. The answers to these questions form the basis of the index. Consumers are asked questions such as:
Would you say that at the present time business conditions are better or worse than they were a year ago?
Would you say that you (and your family living there) are better off or worse off financially than you were a year ago?
Do you think that a year from now you (and your family living there) will be better off financially, or worse off, or just about the same as now?
What do you think will happen to interest rates for borrowing money during the next 12 months—will they go up, stay the same, or go down?
During the next 12 months, do you think that prices, in general, will go up, or go down, or stay where they are now?
About 60% of each monthly survey consists of new responses, and the remaining 40% is drawn from repeat surveys. The repeat surveys help reveal the changes in consumer sentiment over time and provide a more accurate measure of consumer confidence.
According to the University of Michigan, the surveys "have proven to be an accurate indicator of the future course of the national economy." Surveys have demonstrated their ability to accurately anticipate changes in interest rates, unemployment rates, inflation rates, GDP growth, housing, car demand, and other key economic measures.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors may have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The stock market’s recession/inflation concern pendulum swung back towards recession last week as investors focused on what a recession may look like and how a benign one actually might not prove to be too bad.
One narrative doing the rounds last week was that if the oil price continued to come down (and maybe bring inflation down with it), the US economy might still enter a recession, but it could be a mild and short one which would give the Fed more room to respond in a more supportive manner, i.e., not having to raise rates quite as far or as fast.
This thinking was evident in the bond market's behavior as the 10 year Treasury interest rate drifted lower earlier in the week, before rebounding on Thursday and Friday.
The idea of this silver lining boosted stock prices in advance of Friday’s employment report with a generally quiet newswire and very little in the way of earnings or economic reports. Particularly perky were the more “risk-on”, beaten-down corners of the market, including from the wreckage that is profitless tech as well as internet and consumer discretionary stocks.
The release of the minutes of the Fed's June policy meeting did nothing to shake the suggestion that the interest rate hike at the next meeting later this month will be another 0.75% like it was in June. They revealed that the participants recognized the possibility that “an even more restrictive stance on interest rate policy could be appropriate if inflation remains high” and that“inflation pressures have yet to show signs of abating”. Although it should be said that the market seems to have baked this kind of hike into prices already.
The weekly jobless claims figures showed unemployment is on the rise, which is important data for consideration by the Fed as it has always said it will keep raising interest rates until the labor supply-and-demand picture comes back into balance at which point it can slow, stop or even maybe reverse its interest rate hiking policy. These numbers inch the Fed a little further toward that goal.
On Friday, the Labor Department released its monthly employment report (see FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) for June showing that US employers added more jobs last month than economists had expected. Payrolls rose by 372,000 in June, fewer than May's revised gain of 384,000 jobs, but more than the expectation of 250,000. That’s still 524,000 fewer jobs in the economy than there were in February 2020, right before the COVID downturn hit. The unemployment rate held steady at 3.6%, in line with estimates.
The market’s takeaway from all that data was that while it did somewhat soothe fears of an imminent recession, it did little to relieve fears of considerable further Fed interest rate tightening. It did also contain a small nugget that suggested inflation may be peaking as average hourly earnings only rose 0.3% last month, up 5.1% from a year ago.
After the release of the report, investors seemed a little unsure as to how to respond and the indexes bounced around aimlessly all day but generally drifted a little higher to cap quite a successful week, particularly for the NASDAQ. Having said that, volumes were once again low and the somewhat unconvincing and rather directionless nature of the index price movements last week leaves us even more reliant than usual on the Under The Hood analysis (see below) for clues as to what is really going on.
Faced with the backfiring of what was always just an obvious and not-very-clever PR stunt and having to pay a bloated $44 billion for an item currently worth a mere $28 billion, stock market genius Elon Musk is floundering around desperately looking for excuses to back out of his proposed Twitter purchase, including promoting the ridiculous notion that he didn’t realize how badly Twitter is infested by bots and fake accounts. But he might just have signed a couple of forms that he perhaps shouldn’t have, which may mean that he can’t just walk away from the deal. Ooops. Bummer.
Other News: Worldwide Edition
Japanese assassination .. Sadly, the former Prime Minister of Japan, Shinzo Abe, died after being shot twice in the back during a successful assassination attempt at a campaign stop. It has shocked the country, not least because Japan experiences almost no gun violence. He stood down as PM in September 2020 but was still highly influential in government, with the current economic policies of monetary easing, fiscal stimulus and structural reform being known as “Abenomics”.
Bye Bye Boris .. Following months of revelations about banging parties during lockdown, sleaze and sexual assault, jobs for the boys (and certain selected younger girls), jaw-dropping incompetence, endless lies and bungled cover-ups, Boris Johnson was finally forced on Thursday by his own Conservative party (along with the mass co-ordinated resignations of over fifty government ministers) to announce his resignation as the UK’s Prime Minister and gave a petulant, self-pitying and widely-derided resignation speech in front of Number 10 Downing Street.
It seems likely, however, that he will astonishingly remain in the role of top dog until his party has selected a new leader who will become the next PM, a process that could potentially not be completed until September or even early October.
This raises concerns about the shorter term outlook for a country still being run by an angry, unpredictable, self-absorbed lame duck for maybe many weeks, by a man continuing in office having been dumped precisely because he is so clearly unfit for that office, at a time that the country is on the brink of a recession and a cost of living crisis, is living through nationwide strike actions and is enduring some of the more challenging consequences of the Brexit decision.
For the many people over here who are understandably bemused by just what the fk is going on over there and what happens next in a parliamentary system rather than the presidential one, the BBC published a handy guide**.
Home invasion .. Another leader toppled last week was Sri Lanka’s Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who was forced to agree to resign on Saturday after thousands of protesters stormed his official residence and marched in the streets of the capital, Colombo.
Concerns at the IMF and BoE .. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) Managing Director said last week the global growth outlook has weakened significantly since July and she could not rule out a worldwide recession. Not directly related to the political chaos in the country, the Bank of England (BoE) last week issued a pretty apocalyptic report about the global economy and its prospects.
More Euro spending? .. French Finance Minister Bruno LeMaire said the European Union must reconsider its debt rules, allowing for more fiscal spending. At the same time the German government, which had just reported its first trade deficit since Bryan Adams informed us that everything he does, he does for you in 1991, was debating a restart of coal-fired power plants to reduce reliance on natural gas before winter demand kicks in. It is hoped that this would support regional economic growth in addition to dampening inflation.
Under The Hood:
Three weeks after the observation of some of the most oversold conditions of the current decline, buyers are demonstrating very little urgency. From the June 16 low in the S&P 500 through to last Friday’s close, the Net Spread between Lowry’s Buying Power and Selling Pressure has barely moved, hardly a demonstration of the typically robust and swift advance in Demand and rapid retreat in Supply evident after lasting market bottoms in the past. These turnarounds have historically been met by an unmistakable and crushing wave of indiscriminate Demand (“buy everything!!!!”), and this absence implies that prices have not yet gotten low enough to get everyone onto “Team Buy”.
Other important data points like the Percent Of Stocks Above 10- and 30-Week Moving Averages and Percent of Stocks 20% Or More Below Their One Year Highs indicate a very weak foundation to the current rally, so far not even matching their levels during previous rally attempts in May and June, which all failed after quickly fizzling out.
Given all this, there is definitely a high risk that (once again!) what we are seeing is little more than a reflex reaction to an oversold condition rather than the beginning of a meaningful and sustained transition back to a bull market for stocks.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
Aaaaaand .. it’s back! Earnings season is here for Q2 2022. More than a dozen S&P 500 firms report this week, including JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, PepsiCo, Delta Air Lines, Delta Air Lines and Taiwan Semiconductor.
The monster highlight of the week is the release of both the critical June inflation readings: the retail Consumer Price Index (CPI) on Wednesday and the wholesale Producer Price Index (PPI) on Thursday. Consensus expectations are for spikes of 8.7% and 10.7%, respectively - both pretty much unchanged from the May readings.
Other indicators out next week will include the Small Business Optimism Index and the increasingly-closely-watched University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Index.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 19% (down from 23% the previous week)
→Neutral: 28% (down from 30% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 53% (up from 47% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 34 (Bearish by 24 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Discretionary (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) for the second week in a row - up 6.5%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) for the second week in a row - down 1.6%
The NASDAQ-100 meaningfully outperformed the S&P 500
US Markets way outperformed International Developed Markets and Emerging Markets
Large Cap did a little better than Mid or Small
Growth strongly outperformed Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 158 and rose by 2 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure is at 208 and fell by 4 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 51. SPY ended the week 18.7% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 53. QQQ ended the week 26.9% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. Congratulations, you’re living throughwhat will go down in history as an astonishing, chart-breaking period of stock market history. What lessons can be learned from 2020-2022?
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
MONTHLY EMPLOYMENT REPORT
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) releases the Employment Situation Summary, better known as the employment, or jobs report, at 8:30 am ET on the first Friday of every month. The report is based on surveys of households and employers. It estimates the number of people on payrolls in the U.S. economy, the average number of hours they worked weekly, and their average hourly earnings, along with several versions of the unemployment rate.
The jobs report is among the most important and comprehensive economic releases, and the earliest to provide data for the immediately prior month. Its numbers are hotly anticipated and closely parsed as a result.
Many investment firms issue estimates ahead of the report for the monthly change in non-farm payrolls and the U-3 unemployment rate, as well as hours worked and hourly earnings. The report often moves financial markets and is used among other data by the Federal Reserve to assess the state of the economy in setting monetary policy.
The establishment survey, formally called the Current Employment Statistics Survey, gathers data from approximately 145,000 non-farm businesses and government agencies for some 697,000 work sites and about one-third of all payroll workers. The survey is based on the weekly pay period that includes the 12th day of the month.
Anyone on the payroll of a surveyed business during that reference week, including part-time workers and those on paid leave, is included in the count used to produce an estimate of total US non-farm payrolls.
Farm workers are not included because of agriculture's seasonal nature; the sector's reliance on self-employment, unpaid family work, and undocumented workers; and its partial exemption from unemployment insurance requirements, since those records are used to compile the survey sample. The payroll data also does not include self-employed workers.
The household survey is based on monthly interviews of 60,000 households conducted for the BLS by the U.S. Census Bureau. Survey participants are asked about their employment status during the week including the 12th day of the month.2
The most prominent product of the household survey is the official, or U-3, unemployment rate, calculated as a percentage of the unemployed actively seeking work relative to the labor force, or the sum of the employed and the unemployed. To be officially counted as unemployed, the survey respondent has to have been available for work in the reference week and made specific efforts to find work during the four prior weeks, unless awaiting an expected recall from a layoff.
A single month of job gains or losses is hardly a trend, and the monthly change in non-farm payroll numbers is subject to wide fluctuations as well as sizable revisions. Still, it can be an invaluable gauge of economic trends in context with the reports from prior months and other economic data.
Employment is so integral to the U.S. economy that there is no single better proxy for its state, and the monthly jobs report is the most comprehensive employment gauge as well as one of the timeliest monthly economic indicators.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors has reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Investor frustration and confusion at the fact that nothing’s sticking is growing. Authentic-looking rallies like what we saw the previous week end up having no value as they disappear in a puff of red smoke as happened last week. Back to square one as if the rally never happened. This low-traction environment seems (as suggested in my Under The Hood section last week) to be pivoting around the 3800 level for the SPX index (S&P 500).
The index is the at the same level now as it was in the second week of June having been 300 points higher and 300 points lower in the interim. We see inflows into stocks one week, then outflows a few days later. All that stress and those dashed hopes and nothing’s really changed. The bottom has not been found.
However, if you zoom out, you can survey the wreckage properly. The S&P 500 dropped 20.6%, for its worst first-half-year period since the one during which the Jackson Five, Simon & Garfunkel and the Beatles all had number one hits in 1970. The index fell 16% in the second quarter alone. Take a look at an amazing graphic representation of this here.
The declines of 29.5% from the Nasdaq Composite and 23.9% from the Russell 2000 (Small Cap stocks) are both indexes' worst first halves ever recorded. The “Agg” broad index of fixed-income securities (bonds), fell 10.7% since the start of 2022. That's also its worst first-half ever on record.
If you are planning to host a quiz night with your friends and family on the theme of The First Half of 2022, you may find the following useful:
Best-performing sector – Energy +37.7%
Worst-performing sector – Consumer Discretionary -11.5%
Best-performing S&P 500 stock – Occidental Petroleum +103.1%
Worst-performing S&P 500 stock – Netflix -71.0%
Best-performing stock in the Dow Jones Industrial Average – Chevron +23.4%
Worst-performing stock in the Dow Jones Industrial Average – Disney -39.1%
Best-performing market worldwide – Chile +4.9% (in USD)
Worst-performing market worldwide – Russia -41.8% (in USD)
Best-performing commodity – Kerosene (jet fuel) +91.3%
Worst-performing commodity – Hot-Rolled Coil Steel -34.2%
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index -10.7%
10-Year Treasury Yield +1.477 percentage points
CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) +73.5%
Gold -1.3%
WTI Oil +40.6%
U.S. Dollar +9.2%
Bitcoin -60.3%
One possible silver lining is that on the previous five occasions that the S&P 500 has fallen at least 15% the first six months of the year (1932, 1939, 1940, 1962 and 1970), it has risen an average of 24% in the second half. Please take this stat with six large bags of salt and do not make any investment decisions based on it. In fact, you know what? Just forget I even mentioned it.
As is customary at this time of year, trading volume is slowing fast going into the summer with about 4 billion shares changing hands on the New York Stock Exchange on Friday versus typical daily volume of closer to 5 billion. The problem is that thinner volume tends to magnify market moves as it takes less firepower to push a stock price around.
Last week’s price reversal started when the University of Michigan study revised its inflation expectations lower from 3.3% to 3.1% for the next five to 10 years, but that’s still solidly higher than the Fed’s old 2% target. Also, consumers’ short-term outlook for the U.S. economy dropped sharply to its lowest point in nearly a decade. Consumer confidence also fell for a second consecutive month as Americans continue to assess the impact of high prices and rising rates.
The big release, though, was the Fed’s favorite data point, on which it bases most of its decisions, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index for the month of May, showing prices rose 0.6% last month, accelerating from a 0.2% increase in April. The index was up 6.3% from last year, the same year-over-year rate as the month before, still near a 40-year high. The latest readings offered little indication of easing price pressures, with inflation continuing to run hot at a highly elevated rate.
Meanwhile, consumer spending, which accounts for more than two-thirds of economic activity in the US and has held up tremendously well recently, slowed significantly in May, decelerating to a 0.2% growth rate in May from 0.6% in April.
This data combo indicates that consumer spending is slowing much more quickly than inflation is peaking, inevitably raising the volume of those crying recession. The stock market shook its head gloomily and basically wiped out most of the previous week’s gains.
On the plus side, China last week announced it was reducing its quarantine rules for those entering the country. cutting back from two-to-three weeks to ten days. A brief bounce in stocks ensued, but it was a market grasping at straws and it soon fell back again.
To reiterate, my advice to clients is not really changing. Longer term portfolios (time horizons of at least twelve years or more) should be, at a minimum, maintaining their levels of recurring systematic purchases of index exchange traded funds (ETFs) or, even better, selected, sensible factor ETFs (see FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below). If cash flow allows, the amount being purchased should be stepped up to ensure that you are buying in at a lower weighted average price.
For even longer time horizons (like, for example, retirement $$ for people aged 40 or younger), it’s my opinion that you should be backing up the truck right now, but you need to be buying the right kind of ETFs and avoiding others as well as not individual stock-picking. Your future self will be glad you did.
Happy to discuss further with clients.
Other News: Sorry, yet another crypto edition
The Walking Dead .. Bitcoin has now plunged about 40% in just the last four weeks diving below $19,000, it just experienced its worst month ever, its worst quarter since 2011 and it’s now down over 70% from its late 2021 high. Almost a trillion dollars (that’s trillion with a “t”, that’s $1,000,000,000,000) has been wiped off its value.
The situation was not helped last week by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rejecting two more applications for a spot Bitcoin ETF and the arrival on the market of an inverse Bitcoin futures ETF which makes it easy for traders to bet on the price of Bitcoin futures going lower.
And that’s just Bitcoin. Ethereum and all the shitcoins have, for the most part, been crushed even harder, some into terminal oblivion. And right now NFT may as well stand for Nightmare, Fear, Trauma.
The vision of a de-centralized, utopian financial heaven has been replaced by the reality of very old-school Wall Street-like greed, depravity and corruption and Bernie Madoff-style deceptions and dirty schemes all throughout the space. Rebuilding trust beyond the bubble of Bro-World is going to take a long time.
And now the last crypto shoe seems to be dropping. After its initial collapse, reported in my weekly review two weeks ago, crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) entered complete liquidation last week, following a court order issued in the British Virgin Islands after creditors sued the hedge fund for its inability to repay debts amid the broad and deep decline in cryptocurrency markets and ridiculously excessive leverage and margin used by the fund (seriously, if you really believe the price of an asset is going to move from $50,000 to $500,000 and you’re right, you’ll get very rich by just buying in cash without margin or risking 10x, 50x, 100x leverage - which could kill you if your prediction fails and the price falls .. exhibit A).
3AC had pursued an aggressive trading strategy that included placing highly leveraged bets on various cryptocurrencies. The firm also had heavy exposure to the “stable”-coin (serious mis-nomer) Terra USD along with its sister coin, Luna, which fell to pieces, collapsing in value last month, incinerating millions of dollars of client money overnight.
3AC’s co-founders, Zhu Su and Kyle Davies, like Terra’s infamous founder Do Kwon, are among the more obnoxious crypto bros out there and in the weeks leading up to the liquidation, executives sought to placate rumors about a potential liquidation through pumping out misinformation, endlessly tweeting that there was nothing to see here and everything was just peachy.
Along with the seemingly bottomless price disintegration, the failure of 3AC has led to growing concerns of a domino effect whereby other crypto or crypto-adjacent funds and firms and structures could also go under. Many of these have faced liquidity, funding and margin-call issues in recent weeks and months, notably crypto lending firm Celsius (which used to offer as much as 15% to 18% p.a. for deposits of certain “stable”coins) and crypto exchange CoinFlex both of whom recently indefinitely suspended their customers’ ability to access or withdraw their money.
Is anyone ever going to take the razor blade away from the baby by means of strict regulation of the crypto space? We can only hope. The former head of SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement said of crypto-world; “People call it the Wild West. It’s not the Wild West. It’s Walking Dead-like anarchy with no law and order.”
Full disclosure: I personally own a small amount of Bitcoin and Ethereum and have no intention of selling any of it on the (admittedly declining) off-chance that all the optimism about crypto is maybe one day justified - but if it does all go to zero, my overall financial situation is not going to be meaningfully impacted at all.
I am frequently comfortable recommending a similarly-sized crypto holding (i.e., an amount that, if entirely wiped out, would have virtually no real overall financial consequences to the owner) to certain clients as a part of a goal of increased diversification that is theoretically not generally highly-correlated to the overall stock market - in most cases, a maximum of about 1-2% of total investable assets.
I can often facilitate client ownership of Bitcoin or Ethereum using the Flourish platform which is exclusively available to clients of certain financial advisors such as Anglia Advisors.
Under The Hood:
Surveys like those referenced earlier in this report only measure what investors think. The Lowry’s measures of Supply and Demand evaluate how investors act. The spread between Buying Power and Selling Pressure did not plunge to new lows as the S&P 500 set its year-to-date low on June 16. That is not a good divergence for those looking to try and find this market’s bottom.
History tells us that coming out of the Great Financial Crisis, Selling Pressure started to ease in December 2008, while the S&P 500 eventually recorded its final low in late March 2009. Conditions were not ripe for a further three months after Selling Pressure began to ease because that is only Phase One. Phase Two is such an oversold condition following an orgy of indiscriminate selling that finally pushes prices down to the point where equally powerful and highly motivated buyers step in and the markets rips higher, which is Phase Three.
Also, when you look at the readings that have historically been reached in previous bear markets before sustainable rallies finally take off in things like the Percent of Stocks More Than 30% Below Their One Year Highs, Percent of Stocks At New Lows and the relative spread between Supply and Demand numbers - none of them are even close to where they need to be at the moment.
Unfortunately, based on historical analysis of the bottoming process, evidence that we are have reached a major and sustainable market bottom remains incomplete.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
A quiet week ahead .. the stock market will be closed on Monday for Independence Day and it will then be a light week on the earnings calendar with only Costco and Levi Strauss releasing anything of consequence.
The economic data highlight will be the June jobs report on Friday. On average, economists are expecting a gain of 250,000 non-farm payrolls, after an increase of 390,000 in May. The unemployment rate is expected to remain at 3.6%.
Other data out next week will include the Purchasing Managers’ Index and the release of the minutes from the Fed’s most recent meeting last month.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 23% (up from 18% the previous week)
→Neutral: 30% (down from 22% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 47% (down from 60% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 24 (Bearish by 42 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Utilities (two biggest holdings: NextEra Energy, Duke Energy) - up 2.7%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Discretionary (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 4.3%
The S&P 500 fell by quite a lot less than the NASDAQ-100
US Markets, International Developed Markets and Emerging Markets all did equally poorly
Large Cap somewhat lagged Mid or Small
Growth strongly under-performed Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 156 and fell by 17 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure is at 212 and rose by 14 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains a long way below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 44. SPY ended the week 20.2% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains a long way below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 44. QQQ ended the week 30.2% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
This week .. A guide to some of the employers who are to be lauded for making a stand in the face of some of the dark news coming out of Washington DC.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
FACTOR ETFs
Trackers and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that pursue a simple, passive strategy of following a specified market or index have become extremely popular in recent years, as it has become common knowledge to most people that classic stock picking does not work although, bizarrely, some people out there still continue to have faith that they have some kind of mystical predictive ability to successfully select individual stocks.
A pure tracker that entails “buying a market,” such as the S&P 500 or the FTSE in the U.K., has its disadvantages. Although highly transparent, investors are completely exposed to the market in question and all its vicissitudes. It is not surprising, therefore, that hybrid models have emerged that are still tracker ETFs but are deliberately biased in one or more respects. These are often referred to as “factor ETFs.”
The concept behind a factor ETF is that by shifting away from “plain vanilla” trackers, one can improve the rate of return and/or risk level without getting into expensive and time-consuming stock picking. This shift is referred to as “bias” or “tilt.” In other words, these products are not pure trackers; they deviate to some degree from simply going up and down with the specified market.
The following are examples of very “pure” factor ETFs:
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE)
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM)
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE)
Each iShares ETF has a particular tilt, one biased toward small firms, another toward firms whose stock value is accelerating in price or gaining momentum, and a third toward stocks that may be undervalued by the market.
The size factor ETF from iShares focuses on U.S. large- and mid-capitalization stocks "with relatively smaller market capitalization" with the idea that smaller firms tend to be overlooked. The momentum factor ETF invests in stocks with accelerating price and volume, while the value factor ETF weights securities according to four accounting variables and compares these to the parent index.
These three approaches “tilt” the fund away from exposure to your chosen index. These forms of bias all make financial sense, and if properly tuned, should provide a good quasi-tracker, but one that can outperform a pure buying-the-market vehicle.
There are other factor ETFs that focus on factors like free cash flow, low volatility, high beta, dividend yield or even aggregated multi-factors.
These type of ETFs are fairly new, so there is not much of a track record. However, the logic is sound enough that a prudent investment could pay off. Make sure that you understand exactly how the products work. The more an ETF deviates from the pure index (benchmark risk), the more appropriate it may become for sophisticated investors or those with portfolios created and directly managed by a professional, such as Anglia Advisors.
ETFs and trackers are here to stay, given that it is pretty much accepted that paying someone to simply “beat an index" is likely to be counterproductive. Pure trackers have their disadvantages, however, as there is no protection from market movements. Factor ETFs offer some compromise with a bit of "tilt" away from an index. If you are more experienced or adventurous, factor ETFs may make sense as a form of smart diversification and a potential means of enriching your portfolio.
Note: Anglia Advisors makes frequent use of multiple selected factor ETFs in some of its managed and suggested portfolios.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors has reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The R-word rhetoric got stepped up last week. In between increasingly tiresome inflation anecdotes that seem to pop up everywhere from social media to groups of smokers in front of NYC bars, the hot topic has been The Recession.
In today’s report I’m going to dig a little deeper in what a recession is, what it isn’t, how to recognize one and why it just may not be the stock market catastrophe that it is usually portrayed as.
Given the previous week’s carnage and a pretty news-deficient long weekend, a bounce back from oversold conditions on Tuesday was completely unsurprising. There even seemed to be some evidence of a bit of old-school BTFD (remember when that was a thing?).
The Three Keys to a Bottom (peak Fed hawkishness, peak inflation, declining geo-political risk) remain in effect and none have yet been fully triggered although we could start to see some improvement in the first two as the Fed’s favored measure of what it would call true inflation, the Personal Consumption Expenditures index, comes out this week. A benign reading would indicate the inflation could be peaking, potentially reducing the need for such a hawkish stance from the Fed and will cheer Wall Street. But if more of the same, skyrocketing inflation for at least another month with no end in sight, is indicated - look out below.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell, talking to Congress, continued to stress that he believes that the economy can handle higher interest rates. However, he also admitted in response to Senator Elizabeth Warren's questioning that higher interest rates are not going to do anything to help with lower food and energy prices. Finally! Someone actually came out and said what we have all known for months!
Powell said that while it was possible that the Fed could help orchestrate a "soft" economic landing and avoid a recession it was important to understand that “recession is certainly a possibility. Frankly, the events around the world over recent months make it [the soft landing] harder” clearly referring to the war in Ukraine and lockdowns in China that are exacerbating food and energy inflation and the world’s supply-chain problems.
Markets didn’t respond well to all this long overdue honesty and an unexpectedly frank assessment and what was shaping to be quite a nice follow-up to Tuesday’s bounce began to fizzle fast as Powell’s words were digested and Wednesday ended up in the red after a late collapse.
Later in the week, however, we saw a quite meaningful rally in stock prices, as oversold conditions proved too tempting to ignore while the financial newswires were generally quiet and we began to see the (mostly stock market-positive) effects of both index and portfolio rebalancing as well as window-dressing (see FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) in advance of the upcoming end of Q2.
It also didn’t hurt that on Friday, the U.S. Federal Reserve released a report showing that all major U.S. banks passed its stress-testing Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review. This is welcome news for the market with recession on everyone’s mind.
So let’s turn to the R-Word. Broadly speaking, a recession is popularly defined as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth as determined by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), although technically there are other factors that may be taken into account in determining if a recession has “officially” occurred. The point here is that it’s very much a backward-looking endeavor that’s mainly aimed at economic historians years from now and posterity in general. It is not intended for present day consumption or decision-making and certainly has no predictive qualities whatsoever. Recessions are often identified by NBER as having been in place long after the real slowdown in the economy has ended and the recovery is in fact already underway.
Frankly the only way to really know we are in a recession in real time is anecdotal. Friends and family members start getting laid off or having a difficult time of it at work. You see abandoned construction sites in your town. Stores close. Yes, there are a few stats that can indicate a concurrent recession (Purchasing Managers Indexes falling below 50, unemployment numbers starting to spike) but it’s remarkably tricky to know if one is currently experiencing one.
By virtue of her tweet: “When y’all think they going to announce that we going into a recession?”, we know that Cardi B for one is breathlessly waiting for an official recession announcement at some imminent Treasury press conference or something. Sorry Cardi, that just isn’t going to happen. If we are currently in a recession today, we’ll probably find out for sure about it towards the end of the year - by which time we may well no longer be in recession.
So what you potentially have is an extremely forward-looking animal (the stock market) colliding with a very backward-looking one (an official recession declaration) and that can often mean that the damage and the pain can be mostly over by the time we know for sure what the reason for it is. The stock market may well be looking beyond any recession very soon and that is why we need to focus on what is stirring beneath the surface of the market in terms of broad supply and demand rather than reacting to real time events when it comes to figuring out when the skies are beginning to clear. And you’ll find that in my ”Under The Hood” section every week in this report.
When looked at in this context, recessions aren’t necessarily always the stock-killers they may seem. Tom Essaye’s Sevens Report ran the numbers which showed a surprising outcome. Using periods beginning six months before the official recession start dates and ending six months after the official recession end dates, he found that, of the eight official recessions since 1969, five of them saw pretty meaningful S&P 500 price increases over those time periods, moving higher, on average, by a very healthy 14%.
It should said that the other three (1970s stagflation, the dot.com crash of 2001 and the late 2000s financial crisis) did indeed inflict long-lasting and intense damage to stock markets, but the assumption that a recession and a hefty stock market crash inevitably march hand-in-hand in simultaneous lockstep is simply not borne out by the data.
Summing up, while recession is a major buzzword right now, don’t let it significantly scare you. Recessions themselves are arbitrary designations and the economy slows well ahead of them and market declines tend to occur a long time before they are declared. By the time the economy is deemed to be in one, stocks can often have already bottomed out and are looking towards the recovery.
What matters far more than whether a recession exists or not is its duration once it has been determined that it is in place. The three “bad” ones each lasted for a long time and proved far more destructive than the other shorter ones. A short recession, even if it is intense, is going to hurt far less than a long-drawn-out affair that may never reach that level of intensity, but just drags on and on.
Other News:
Falling sales, rising prices .. Record-setting prices and rising mortgage rates sent sales of previously-owned homes to their lowest level in almost two years. The number of existing home sales 3.4% from April to May, the fourth consecutive monthly decline and the fewest sales since June 2020. That’s 8.6% lower than a year ago. The amount of home sales have essentially round-tripped back to levels seen in early 2019 before the COVID outbreak.
Further declines in sales should be expected in the coming months because of the industry euphemistically calls “housing affordability challenges”. The median price for an existing home went above $400,000 for the first time ever, reaching $407,600, a 14.8% rise over the last year.
Bye, bye Juul .. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced plans last week to limit nicotine levels in cigarettes and then ordered Juul to be completely shut down, pulling all of its e-cigarette devices and pods from the US market with immediate effect. Altria/Philip Morris (MO) paid more than $12 billion for a stake in Juul in 2018. Even prior to the FDA’s announcement, that stake had collapsed in value to be worth less than $2 billion, according to recent disclosures from Altria. And it’s now going to be worth a whole lot less, if anything at all.
Predictably, when the Wall Street Journal broke the story on Wednesday, MO stock got whacked.
The employer match is great, but .. Workplace retirement accounts can make investing for your retirement easy, and many employers even offer a match. But matches often come with a big caveat, i.e., your vesting schedule, whereby you are not entitled to any or some of your employer match until you have worked for them for a number of years. Vesting doesn’t really encourage you to stuff your 401(k), it encourages you to stay at your employer longer. And if you stick with the same job for a long time, you could be forfeiting a higher salary elsewhere. In this era of the Great Reset, the smart $$$ move might just be to stop waiting for your employer retirement match to vest and change jobs instead.
The current state of employer matches looks like this: 47% of employers make workers wait at least three years for their matching retirement account contribution to fully vest, but many employees don’t get to that point. Millennials on average spend two years and nine months in any given job, compared to over five years and eight years for Gen Xers and Boomers, respectively. This means younger workers are more likely to lose out on some or all of their employer match.
The projected average raise for people working in 2022 is 3.9% and the typical employer retirement account match is 50 cents for every employee-contributed dollar on the first 6% of pay (meaning, if the worker puts the full 6% into their 401(k), their employer will top it off with an additional 3% contribution). So, on average, staying another year at your job translates to a 6.9% gain for you, unless you aren’t vested yet. On the other hand, many job switchers can expect more than a 6.9% increase in compensation.
Of course the best solution is immediate vesting. It’s offered by 28% of employers, so we know it’s totally worth you nagging your boss for.
Under The Hood:
A number of technical analysts are identifying the S&P 500 level of 3800 as a very important. If the market can stay above that level (it closed Friday at 3911) then it could have the potential to squeeze prices violently higher, at least for the short term, but if the index sinks back below that level and can’t make it back again in a series of failed assaults, it would show solid resistance there and could lead to a further significant decline.
I am somewhat skeptical of the practice of drawing rather subjective lines onto a chart and drawing consequential conclusions from where that line extends out to and nor am I a huge believer in the power of “round numbers” when it comes to index levels, but sometimes enough people believing something can be sufficient to make it happen.
What we really need to look at is supply and demand. We have seen multiple days of intense selling suggesting that, finally, the exhaustion of Supply we have all been waiting for may well be in progress. I tend to agree. However, the key term here is “in progress”. It is human nature to look for bargains and investors often think they have found what they are looking for just because they are looking for it so desperately. “Stocks must be cheap”, goes the narrative. The problem is that low prices do not necessarily equal good value.
The first thing we need to see is a very sharp drop in Selling Pressure, the key measure of Supply that I track every week in this report. As sellers eventually become exhausted, they become weaker with fewer shares available to sell. Next needs to come a real spike in Buying Power, the key measure of Demand (also tracked in this report), which demonstrates that prices are finally low enough to attract serious buying. In the current market, Buying Power still remains closer to its 2022 lows than to its highs, so some patience is needed.
The final piece of the jigsaw is that conditions need to be heavily oversold (which can be measured by the Relative Strength Index - RSI, which is also tracked in this report) for a rally to succeed, which essentially represents how far back the rubber band has been stretched before it is let go.
While it might be that the process has indeed begun, it is definitely not complete. Buyers and sellers are still slugging it out, the referee has not stepped in to stop the bout yet.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
It will be an economic-data heavy week, but there are still a few notable companies reporting earnings or having investor days as well. They include FedEx, Nike, Hewlett Packard, Walgreens, General Mills, Micron Technology and Jefferies Financial Group.
On Monday, we get the durable goods report for May, which will give insight into business investment and consumer spending. On Tuesday is the release the Consumer Confidence Index for June. Inflation remains top of mind for consumers.
Later in the week we have personal income and spending data for May. That release includes the Personal Consumption Expenditures index, which is the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge. Wall Street will be looking closely for elusive signs of a peak in inflation.
The release of the manufacturing purchasing managers’ index on Friday will be more closely examined than usual as it is one of the few data points that can point to the state of economic growth in mostly real time. It is forecast to decline slightly from May's reading, but remain solidly in expansion territory.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 18% (down from 20% the previous week)
→Neutral: 22% (unchanged from 22% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 60% (up from 58% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 42 (Bearish by 38 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). All numbers rounded.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Discretionary (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 8.1%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - down 4.28%
The NASDAQ-100 outperformed the S&P 500
US Markets did much better than International Developed Markets and Emerging Markets
Large Cap fared somewhat better than Mid or Small
Growth solidly outperformed Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 173 and rose by 13 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure is at 198 and fell by 7 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains a long way below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 48. SPY ended the week 18.3% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022).
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains a long way below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 50. QQQ ended the week 27.0% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021).
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Each week I'll link to an interesting article I have come across recently.
This week: Buy a f*g latte! Ignore the stupid nonsense from Dave Ramsey, Suze Orman and the rest. That’s not where the problems lie**.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
WINDOW DRESSING
Window dressing is a strategy used by mutual fund and other portfolio managers to improve the appearance of a fund’s performance before presenting it to clients or shareholders. To window dress, the fund manager sells stocks with large losses and purchases high-flying stocks near the end of the quarter or year. These securities are then reported as part of the fund's holdings.
The term can also refer to actions taken by companies to improve their forthcoming financial statement, such as by postponing payments or finding ways to book revenues earlier.
How it works .. Performance reports and a list of the holdings in a mutual fund are usually sent to clients every quarter, and clients use these reports to monitor the fund's investment returns. When performance has been lagging, mutual fund managers may use window dressing, selling stocks that have reported substantial losses and replacing them with stocks expected to produce short-term gains to improve the overall performance of the fund for the reporting period.
Another variation of window dressing is investing in stocks that do not meet the style of the mutual fund. For example, a precious metals fund might invest in stocks in a hot sector at the time, disguising the fund's holdings and investing outside the scope of the fund’s investment strategy.
A fund investing in stocks exclusively from the S&P 500 has underperformed the index. Stocks A and B outperformed the total index but were underweight in the fund, while stocks C and D were overweight in the fund but lagged the index.
To make it look like the fund was investing in stocks A and B all along, the portfolio manager sells out of stocks C and D, replacing them with, and giving an overweight to, stocks A and B.
For investors, window dressing provides another good reason to monitor your fund performance reports closely. Some fund managers might try to improve returns through window dressing, which means investors should be cautious of holdings that seem out of line with the fund’s overall strategy.
Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), which typically publish their holdings daily, not quarterly, are not subject to window dressing like mutual funds are.
The act of window dressing is under close watch by investment researchers and regulators with potentially forthcoming rules that could require more immediate and greater transparency of holdings at the end of a reporting period
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is at no time ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice. It is also wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors has reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The Federal Reserve has now shifted to a full-on, break-the-glass emergency footing on inflation. It’s busting out the big guns in the form of a lumpy interest rate increase and very loud threats that it will not stop until the beast of high inflation is finally slain. And if that remedy pushes the country into a recession, well then so be it. The result was the worst week for the stock market since those scary days back in February 2020.
Markets moved seamlessly from the ghastly Friday of the previous week to an equally dire Monday of last week, plummeting further as speculation began to grow of the need for a 0.75% interest rate hike by the Fed after being spooked by Friday’s hotter-than-expected May Consumer Price Index (CPI) growth. Monday’s plunge took the S&P 500 into official bear market territory (down over 20% from the high).
It is said that the stock market has a memory and it could well have been that it was remembering what had happened just a month ago, at the time of the last Fed meeting. As a reminder to those who don’t live and breathe this stuff 24/7, the 0.50% increase in rates that day was met in the hours following the announcement and press conference by smug, nodding approval from the usual talking heads on CNBC and elsewhere (“this is exactly what they should have done, the market will be happy”) and Fed chair Jerome Powell said in his press conference that the possibility of more than 0.50% had never even been considered.
And indeed, the market did party nicely higher for the rest of that day. But the next day saw an absolute bloodbath - markets slaughtered across the board with nowhere to hide. The exact same set of facts that been widely accepted as good news at 2:30pm on a Wednesday turned out to be disastrous by the opening bell on a Thursday.
Surely that exact market scenario couldn’t play out again identically just weeks later. Could it?
The frenzied speculation of the 0.75% hike grew to a near-certainty by Wednesday morning last week, with trader positioning in the futures market showing the probability of this outcome moving from 4% to 97% in the space of three working days and the Fed duly obliged in the afternoon with officials announcing a 0.75% rate rise, which increased the Fed’s benchmark federal funds rate to a range between 1.50% and 1.75% and the median expectation among officials for the mid-point of the fed funds rate to be 3.375% by the end of the year.
Interestingly, the Fed removed the long-used phrase indicating that it “expects inflation to return to its two percent objective and the labor market to remain strong.” from its post-meeting statement. Powell claimed in the press conference that the phrase was removed because it gave the false impression that the inflation rate in the US was uniquely dependent on Fed actions when it is clear that events beyond the Fed’s control in China, Ukraine and at supply chain ports around the world are having a significant impact on US inflation.
In terms of expectation-setting, he also said that he doesn't anticipate hikes of this magnitude to be "common". However, he hedged nicely by stating that the July meeting could see an increase of “between 0.50% and 0.75%”. Well played, sir. But we haven’t forgotten what you said in your press conference in May.
The immediate reaction on Wednesday afternoon, just like last month, was a reflexive rebound in stock prices. However, considering the prior string of five, sometimes intense, consecutive losses, there was a sense that this response may be little more than a reaction to oversold short term conditions, especially considering it was led by the biggest loser names and no-one was really fooled.
Then, in an eerie echo of events just a month earlier, markets cratered the next day with profit-less tech and Small Cap stocks in general getting mauled the hardest and the least badly-affected being the defensive stocks like consumer staples and utilities. As I have said before in previous reports, this type of sector price action does not typically reflect a market on the brink of recovery.
If you wanted to sum up this week’s action in one sentence, it would read something like: The market appears to be desperately trying to reprice itself lower to discount in advance the growing likelihood of a recession caused partly by the acceleration of interest rates deemed necessary to fight soaring inflation.
Short term gyrations don’t matter much, though. What investors really want to know is; when is all this s**t going to end? No-one knows of course, but on one hand, if the Fed is right and inflation is essentially a 2022 problem that fixes itself in 2023, then the end of this decline in stocks is much closer to the finish line than the starting line (not to say that the bottom is in yet).
On the other hand, if the Fed is wrong (which it has been pretty much all along when it comes to inflation .. remember “transitory”?) then we are not close to a bottom yet because the past six months of reactionary, growing Fed hawkishness at every turn is only going to continue.
If that’s the case, and if it is true that the market has memories, we could well be looking at a base case of completing a total round-trip to the immediate pre-COVID-crash levels of February 2020 (for the S&P 500 that’s SPX 3383, about another 8% fall from here). For reference, the COVID-low of March 2020 is SPX 2237, still another 39% below where we are.
A quick look at the other main drivers of stock market performance doesn’t really provide much comfort. It is becoming clear that China is not abandoning its zero-Covid policy and as a result the market must continue to consider the possibility that new lockdowns could be enacted at any time and with little or no advance notice. And the Ukraine conflict drags on and on with no sign whatsoever of any kind of imminent conclusion.
On the economic data front, the Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation was a little better than expected but retail sales dropped unexpectedly.
The housing market is starting to seize up with buyers, sellers and builders all looking to be on the brink of basically going on strike.
Mortgage rates have essentially doubled this year, tossing millions of potential buyers onto the scrapheap with home prices where they are. Sellers suddenly face the prospect of trading in their lovely, recently-refinanced 2.75% mortgage for a 6% one if they sell their home and buy another. Many figure that they’d be a lot better off by taking their home off the market and maybe spending some money on renovation instead (despite a raw material shortage and enhanced labor costs). Figures last week showed housing starts fell nearly 15% between April and May and the number of building permits issued dropped 7% over the same period.
So we have less inventory, crippled buyers and de-motivated sellers. Not a great combo. Major real estate brokers Redfin and Compass reacted last week by each laying off close to 10% of their staff.
Other News: Crypto edition
The price of Bitcoin is in free-fall, last week sinking below the 20,000 level as well as breaking below its 2017 high and has now shed well over two-thirds of its value in just eight months (in what is still only the fourth worst sell-off in its short history). Other digital coins are getting completely slaughtered as well.
Only a year out from its Initial Public Offering (IPO, see FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below), Coinbase has already had to come out and deny rumors of bankruptcy (at which time we learned via regulatory filings that the company reserves the legal right to potentially seize its own customers’ crypto assets invested on the platform to help pay off its own creditors if it ever did happen) and the stock price has fallen even further since these rumors first emerged. The company also announced just last week that it was laying off over a thousand employees in cutting its workforce by nearly 20% and has been reneging on job offers it had made to candidates.
Crypto lender Terra/Luna UST collapsed in May which proved tragic in the sense that so many people’s lives and savings were destroyed, even driving a number of them to suicide. Watching one of crypto’s biggest a*s (a high bar indeed), Terra founder Do “Have Fun Staying Poor”* Kwon, get what was coming to him was a brief schadenfreude interlude.
And then last week, we saw other crypto lenders Celsius Networks and Hong Kong-based Babel Finance, firms with not dissimilar business models to that of Terra/Luna, alarmingly freezing all client transactions (including withdrawals), citing “extreme market conditions”.
Crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital fell apart last week and got liquidated after failing to be able to make margin calls (a concept not understood by most laser-eyed bros) which then caused yet another crypto lender Finblox, heavily dependent on Three Arrows for much of its liquidity, to also block its customers’ ability to withdraw their funds.
Even the massive Binance crypto exchange suspended withdrawals of Bitcoin pending some clarity on what on earth was happening in crypto-world.
A number of dominoes may be falling and this could be serious stuff. The Coinbase story even made the front page lead of the Financial Times last week. Crypto investor money is now seen to be at potential risk of instant incineration or even possible confiscation in an arena that was supposed to be the transparent, libertarian brave new world for everyone.
And with NFT sales down more than 92% over the last year, I think it’s safe to say that the whole crypto industry and crypto-adjacent ecosystem is in seriously deep s**t in the short and medium term at the very least, no matter how the bros furiously try to spin it on Twitter and Discord.
Store of value? Nope. Not even close.
Inflation hedge? Haha. Obviously not.
Ultimate replacement for the dollar whose future as the world’s reserve currency is doomed? Have you looked at what the dollar has been doing during this crypto cremation?
Safe from confiscation by The Man? It would seem not (see Coinbase’s potential deposit-grab, for example).
Self-polices effectively against unscrupulous or incompetent individuals and organizations with no need for formalized strict regulation? Er, no. It doesn’t.
Can safely generate income though staking? Not any more, it would seem (see above).
Is crypto currency valuation still primarily determined by the Greater Fool Theory (which tends to work - until it doesn’t)? Yep.
Things could be worse though, you might live in El Salvador.
Full disclosure:
I personally own a very small amount of Bitcoin and Ethereum and have no intention of selling any of it on the (admittedly declining) off-chance that all the optimism about crypto is maybe one day justified - but if it does all go to zero, my overall financial situation is not going to be meaningfully impacted at all.
I am frequently happy to recommend a similarly-sized crypto holding (i.e. an amount that, if entirely wiped out, would have virtually no real overall financial consequences to the owner) to certain clients as a part of a goal of increased diversification that is not generally highly-correlated to the overall stock market - in most cases, a maximum of maybe 1-2% of total investable assets, no more.
I can often facilitate their ownership of Bitcoin or Ethereum using the Flourish platform which is exclusively available to clients of certain financial advisors such as myself.
Under The Hood:
Following the carnage and brutal selling of Friday of the previous week and Monday of last week, the pathetic attempt at a bounce-back rally on Tuesday, despite strong short term over-sold conditions, was maybe even more concerning. Obviously there was no real demand from investors positioning themselves for Wednesday’s Fed decision and following a head-fake rally right after the announcement the market was crashing again.
Signs of a sustainable bottom begin with deeply oversold market conditions, especially in longer-term indicators and we may have seen some of these begin to appear last week. For example, the bottom fell out of a key momentum indicator, the Percent of Stocks Above Their 30-Week Moving Average, which fell below the commonly-accepted oversold level of 15%.
By Thursday, more than 90% of stocks in the S&P 500 had declined for five of the past seven days. Precedents for this since 1928? Zero. By some measures we are seeing one of the most overwhelming displays of selling in history.
After Thursday’s carnage, nearly 40% of stocks in the S&P 500 closed at their one year lows. By point of comparison with the Great Financial Crisis, this stocks-at-their-one-year-low measure peaked in November 2008, four months before the indexes themselves bottomed in March 2009.
For those who have been looking for complete capitulation to signal a possibly sustainable return to a bull market, last week may have provided some green shoots. But always remember that bear market rallies are entirely designed to look and feel like true bull market rebirths, otherwise they are not doing their jobs – pulling in as many hopeful investors as possible into the jaws of an ongoing bear market.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
A very light calendar this week. U.S. stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday in observance of Juneteenth. There will only be a handful of earnings reports or annual shareholders meetings when investors return, most notably from Mastercard, FedEx, Blackberry, Lennar, Activision, Darden Restaurants and CarMax.
The release of the manufacturing and services purchasing managers’ indexes on Thursday will give us further insight into the state of US economic expansion.
On the real estate front, we will learn about existing home sales and the weekly mortgage applications survey will likely be watched with more interest than usual.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 20% (down from 21% the previous week)
→Neutral: 22% (down from 32% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 58% (up from 47% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 38 (Bearish by 26 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). All numbers rounded.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Staples (two biggest holdings: Proctor & Gamble, Coca-Cola) - down 4.2%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - down 17.4%
The S&P 500 did a little worse than the NASDAQ-100
The US and International Developed Markets again underperformed Emerging Markets
Large Cap fared somewhat better than Mid or Small
Value underperformed Growth
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 160 and fell by 16 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure is at 205 and rose by 19 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is still well below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains a long way below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 31. SPY ended the week 23.4% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022)
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is still well below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains a long way below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 34. QQQ ended the week 32.0% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021)
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Each week I'll link to an interesting article I have come across recently.
This week: Recognize what it is that you are watching! Whether it’s on CNBC or Fin-Tok, it’s unregulated financial advice. Mostly really BAD financial advice from people unqualified to give it with an agenda to make you poorer and them richer.
It’s also a deeply honest commentary on the learning process and experience of someone who only discovered the stock market over the last couple of crazy years.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING (IPO)
An initial public offering (IPO) refers to the process of offering shares of a private corporation to the public in a new stock issuance. An IPO allows a company to raise capital from public investors. The transition from a private to a public company can be an important time for private investors to fully realize gains from their investment as it typically includes a share premium for current private investors. Meanwhile, it also allows public investors to participate in the offering.
Before an IPO, a company is considered private. As a pre-IPO private company, the business has grown with a relatively small number of shareholders including early investors like the founders, family, and friends along with professional investors such as venture capitalists or angel investors.
An IPO is a big step for a company as it provides the company with access to raising a lot of money. This gives the company a greater ability to grow and expand. The increased transparency and share listing credibility can also be a factor in helping it obtain better terms when seeking borrowed funds as well.
When a company reaches a stage in its growth process where it believes it is mature enough for the rigors of SEC regulations along with the benefits and responsibilities to public shareholders, it will begin to advertise its interest in going public.
Typically, this stage of growth will occur when a company has reached a private valuation of approximately $1 billion, also known as unicorn status. However, private companies at various valuations with strong fundamentals and proven profitability potential can also qualify for an IPO, depending on the market competition and their ability to meet listing requirements.
IPO shares of a company are priced through underwriting due diligence. When a company goes public, the previously owned private share ownership converts to public ownership, and the existing private shareholders’ shares become worth the public trading price. Share underwriting can also include special provisions for private to public share ownership.
Generally, the transition from private to public is a key time for private investors to cash in and earn the returns they were expecting. Private shareholders may hold onto their shares in the public market or sell a portion or all of them for gains.
Meanwhile, the public market opens up a huge opportunity for millions of investors to buy shares in the company and contribute capital to a company’s shareholders' equity. The public consists of any individual or institutional investor who is interested in investing in the company.
Overall, the number of shares the company sells and the price for which shares sell are the generating factors for the company’s new shareholders' equity value. Shareholders' equity still represents shares owned by investors when it is both private and public, but with an IPO, the shareholders' equity increases significantly with cash from the primary issuance.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results, events or outcomes.
The material contained herein is wholly insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors has reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, we have no control over, and the firm is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Last week saw some damaging backsliding for two of the three primary market drivers (how hawkish the Fed needs to be and China lockdowns) and no meaningful sign of progress in the third (Ukraine).
After the market indexes kind of meandered around without much direction early in the week, a sense slowly began to build that Friday’s inflation number might end up being more troubling than had been previously assumed. This was perhaps triggered by a second warning in the space of three weeks from Target (TGT) on Tuesday that the company would be forced into cutting prices — and profits — to pare down the retailer's excess inventory of goods that are not selling and added that "decisive" action was needed to keep these problems from lingering until later in the year.
Remember, the prevailing view until recently had been that we may well have hit peak inflation in April and that May’s data release would finally signal a beginning of the end of these current spiked inflation levels. But doubts began to emerge as the week went on.
The fears proved well-founded. On Friday morning, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of retail inflation came out and showed no such positive signs. It rose by 1.0% in May alone and 8.6% from May 2021, the highest since Olivia Newton John was getting physical with everyone in December 1981. These numbers were even worse than in April and also higher than consensus expectations. Surging prices for energy, housing, and food contributed the most to the increase, with the energy index alone jumping 3.9% last month after actually declining in April. Core CPI, which excludes more volatile food and energy prices, climbed 0.6% in May, and was up 6.0% from last year, also higher than expected.
Obviously, these numbers aren't convincing anyone that things are getting any better. Peak inflation is very much not here – not yet, anyway. The Fed has told us all that it is going to continue stomping on the brakes but the prices of essentials like shelter, meat, bread, eggs, gas etc. with relatively inelastic demand (and, notably, which interest rate adjustments don’t really help to cool), are still rocketing higher with no end in sight. Additionally, the ongoing war in Ukraine pretty much rules out a material fall in food and energy prices any time soon.
The issue is whether we are going to get an old-fashioned “bust” before short term rates get raised high enough to start having an effect on inflation. The previously-trending idea of a Fed “pause” after 0.50% hikes at each of its two upcoming meetings next week and in July seems to now be pretty much in tatters.
Inevitably, the yield on the 10-year Treasury note jumped back above 3% to its highest level in a month, but the closely-watched spread between the 10 year rate and the 2 year rate narrowed sharply and is now less than 0.1%. Many believe that the tighter this spread gets (and indeed, ultimately crosses over whereby the 2 year rate becomes higher than the 10 year), the more inevitable a recession becomes.
At the same time, the University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Index hit the lowest level in its history as Americans expressed significant concerns about rising prices, especially at the gas station, with 46% of respondents attributing their negative views about the economy to inflation.
Because markets had somehow swallowed the story of the arrival of a peak in both inflation and the Fed’s hawkishness and already priced it in, stocks had the s**t kicked out of them on Friday. The downward path of least resistance was not helped by news out of China. Shanghai's government said it would place a district in the southwestern part of the city under restrictions for mandatory mass COVID testing, starting Saturday. Then another outbreak of COVID was reported near Beijing on Thursday.
Further reducing the number of places to hide, the European Central Bank announced it will raise interest rates next month for the first time in eleven years and could make an even bigger hike after that in an effort to slow soaring inflation in the EuroZone. It is also ending its bond purchase program put in place during the COVID crisis to boost the economy. Worth bearing in mind: the first hike will likely raise rates to zero.
The bottom line is that inflation has to not only peak but also show evidence of starting to meaningfully recede for the skies to begin to clear and after Friday’s data, no-one has any idea when this will happen. The Fed has made it clear that it regards inflation as a far bigger enemy than recession and will definitely risk the latter in trying to crush the former. Each time the inflation data shows no relief, the Fed is going to further double-down on its mission.
Other News:
Doing the splits .. Amazon (AMZN) split its stock this week stock at a rate of 20:1. (see FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) and Tesla (TSLA) announced that it would do the same, but at a rate of 3:1. The forward stock splits will increase the total number of outstanding shares in the company while at the same time reducing the share price by the same multiple.
As a result, while eligible shareholders with shares at the time of the split will receive more shares, the total dollar value and cost basis of their positions will not change. A stock split neither creates nor destroys value. The total amount of pizza doesn’t change whether the pie is cut into four slices or eight.
Speculation is that the move is primarily designed to make it easier for these firms to be incorporated in the calculation of Dow Jones Industrial Average of just thirty stocks, which, uniquely (and ridiculously!) among stock market indexes, is a price-weighted average that would be blown out by the inclusion of these stocks at their current elevated prices.
Stores filled with the wrong items? .. Shoppers have shifted spending from the casual clothes and home items that had been in demand during the height of the pandemic, catching most retailers off guard and leaving them with excess goods that now need to be marked down so they can be moved. Target (TGT) wasn’t the only retailer to point this out. Joggers are piled up at Gap (GPS), Macy’s (M) has too much activewear and Kohl’s (KSS - an apparent target last week of a takeover by the owners of the Vitamin Shoppe) is full of fleece. But Macy’s said markdowns to clear the excess inventory would weigh heavily on profit margins, and warned of higher promotional levels throughout the industry as other retailers do the same.
Credit card worries .. There is growing concern about rapidly increasing credit-card usage by consumers amidst rising interest rates. As rates go up, credit-card companies charge even more for balances carried by consumers. Those levels are usually extremely high since, unlike mortgages and car loans, there is no collateral involved. The average interest rate currently being charged is 16.7%. That's the highest level in two years.
The latest revision of first-quarter gross domestic product showed US Household Disposable Income is down 5.5% compared with the same period a year ago. That points to rapidly shrinking spending power for American households.
This is a potentially toxic combo of circumstances as disposable income will shrink further and faster as higher debt needs to be serviced at higher interest rates. If this dynamic doesn't change, it could easily help push the economy into a recession.
Under The Hood:
What technical indicators should we be looking out for when it comes to signs that the market may have bottomed out?
The ideal setup for a lasting bottom is usually a fully oversold market where anything and everything is indiscriminately dumped by investors resulting in the complete exhaustion of Supply, immediately followed by a powerful and sustainable reversal that takes important core indicators back above recent highs.
Further evidence that the primary trend is actually changing from negative to positive may be found in this reversal being confidently led by the “risk-on” portions of the market, such as smaller stocks and the NASDAQ. Relative outperformance from traditionally aggressive sectors, such as technology and consumer discretionary, would provide further confidence in any rally rather than the leaders being from the more defensive sectors, such as utilities, consumer staples and healthcare.
Unfortunately, none of this is happening. We are still experiencing pretty high Relative Strength Indicator (RSI) levels (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below) demonstrating a distinct lack of the oversold condition associated with the kind of capitulation that usually precedes a true rebound rally. Persistent RSI readings of below 30 or even below 25 are usually required to trigger such capitulation and current readings (even after falling hard at the end of last week) are still closer to 40.
When short term rallies do occur, any leadership provided by the important aggressive sectors (particularly technology) usually fizzles out very quickly, rarely lasting more than a day or two before resuming its role as the market’s punching bag as happened at the end of last week.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
This week will be dominated by the interest rate decision from the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) after its two-day meeting ends on Wednesday. Chairman Jerome Powell will answer questions from the press that afternoon. It’s almost completely priced in that the FOMC will raise its Fed Funds target by half a percentage point, to a range of 1.25% to 1.50%. Any deviation from this will be seismic to markets.
Their projections for economic growth, the unemployment rate, inflation, and future interest rates will give economists and investors greater insight into the committee's possible next moves.
A light week for earnings reports features Adobe, Kroger and Oracle with The New York Times and NextEra Energy hosting investor days.
The measure of wholesale inflation, Producer Price Index (PPI) comes out on Tuesday. It is expected to have climbed 0.7% in May, for a 10.8% year-over-year increase with the non-food and -energy Core rate rising 0.6% and 8.7% respectively.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 21% (down from 32% the previous week)
→Neutral: 32% (up from 31% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 47% (up from 37% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 26 (Bearish by 5 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). All numbers rounded.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) once again - down 1.0%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Financials (two biggest holdings: Berkshire Hathaway, JP Morgan Chase) - down 6.9%
The NASDAQ-100 did a little worse than the S&P 500
The US and International Developed Markets both hugely underperformed Emerging Markets
Large Cap performed worse than Mid or Small
Growth underperformed Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 176 and fell by 11 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure is at 186 and rose by 6 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is well below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 38. SPY ended the week 18.4% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022)
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is well below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 39. QQQ ended the week 28.5% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021)
** RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 tend to indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical rebound and above 70 are often considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical decline
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Each week I'll link to an interesting article I have come across recently.
This week: “Save this link for the next time you find yourself pining away for the massive gains that other investors seem to be enjoying.”
With regular reports of massive hedge fund losses and closures, Josh Brown reminds us howthe ups simply don’t happen without the downs.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
STOCK SPLIT
A stock split is a corporate action in which a company issues additional shares to shareholders, increasing the total by the specified ratio based on the shares they held previously. Companies often choose to split their stock to lower its trading price to a more comfortable range for most investors and to increase the liquidity of trading in its shares.
Most investors are more comfortable purchasing, say, 100 shares of a $10 stock as opposed to 1 share of a $1,000 stock, even though arithmetically there is no difference. So when the share price has risen substantially, many public companies end up declaring a stock split to reduce it. Although the number of shares outstanding increases in a stock split, the total dollar value of the shares remains the same compared with pre-split amounts, because the split does not make the company more valuable.
The most common split ratios are 2-for-1 or 3-for-1 (sometimes denoted as 2:1 or 3:1). This means for every share held before the split, each stockholder will have two or three shares, respectively, after the split. Having said that, a company's board of directors can choose to split the stock by any ratio. For example, a stock split may be 2:1, 3:1, 5:1, 10:1, 100:1, etc. A 3:1 stock split means that for every one share held by an investor, there will now be three. In other words, the number of outstanding shares in the market will triple.
On the other hand, the price per share after the 3:1 stock split will be reduced by dividing the old share price by 3. That's because a stock split does not alter the company's value as measured by market capitalization.
Special considerations .. Market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the total number of shares outstanding by the price per share. For example, assume XYZ Corp. has 20 million shares outstanding and the shares are trading at $100. Its market cap will be 20 million shares x $100 = $2 billion.
Let's say the company’s board of directors decides to split the stock 2:1. Right after the split takes effect, the number of shares outstanding would double to 40 million, while the share price would be halved to $50. Although both the number of shares outstanding and the market price have changed, the company's market cap remains unchanged at (40 million shares x $50) $2 billion.
A stock split isn't worthless, but it doesn't impact the fundamental position of a company and therefore doesn't create additional value. Some compare a stock split to slicing a pizza pie. The total amount of pizza is the same whether it has been cut into 4 slices, 8 slices or 16 slices. And the number of slices also has no effect on whether the pizza tastes good or not.
Reverse stock splits .. A traditional stock split is also known as a forward stock split. A reverse stock split is the opposite of a forward stock split. A company carrying out a reverse stock split decreases the number of its outstanding shares and increases the share price proportionately. As with a forward stock split, the market value of the company after a reverse stock split remains the same.
A company that takes this corporate action might do so if its share price had decreased to a level at which it runs the risk of being delisted from an exchange for not meeting the minimum price required for a listing. Certain mutual funds may not invest in stocks priced below a preset minimum per share. A company might also opt for a reverse split to make its stock more appealing to investors who may perceive higher-priced shares as more valuable.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results or outcomes. The material contained herein is insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors has reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, Anglia Advisors has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of this content nor the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, the risk of accessing these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Stocks looked on track to rise for the second straight week after that seven-week barren spell. The indexes were marching higher, having overcome headwinds like some alarming inflation numbers from the EuroZone, rising oil prices caused by enhanced European sanctions on Russia and some rather unimpressive earnings guidance from Microsoft. Then came Jobs Friday.
The Labor Department announced that U.S. employers added more jobs than expected last month, but fewer than in April. 390k jobs were added in May, above economists’ estimates of 317k, after an upwardly-revised gain of 436k for April. Much of the gains were in the services sector, as jobs rose in leisure and hospitality, professional and business services. The unemployment rate remained at 3.6%, with the number of unemployed essentially unchanged at six million. This all sounds pretty good, right? Keep on buying stocks, yeah?
Not so fast, said investors. None of these data seem likely to induce the Fed to slow its pace of interest rate increases. You may have seen in the media recently that these days “good” economic data is “bad” for markets and “bad” economic data is “good” for markets. It’s not quite as simplistic as that - but there is definitely a requirement for major economic data to be of what’s known as the “Goldilocks” variety, not too hot and not too cold.
That is, economic readings that still imply some growth, but that also reflect that an economy is losing forward momentum showing that Fed tightening is working. This is the needle the Fed is trying to thread. And that’s especially true of Friday’s jobs report. The sense was that it was not quite Goldilocks enough and prices turned and headed south for the rest of the day on Friday to finish lower for the week.
I have previously identified the three main drivers of stock markets right now which need at least movement towards resolution before we can experience a meaningful and sustainable recovery and it’s worth checking in on where they currently stand.
Inflation and its effect on the Fed .. It’s still unclear by how much inflation will decline but there are some signs that we may have seen the peak. These include the last set of both Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Producer Price Index (PPI) data as well as the measure most closely watched by the Fed when making its decisions, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Index (see FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below). We will learn more on Friday when the CPI data for May is released. The knock-on effect of this data is, of course, the response of the Fed when it comes to how aggressive it needs to be with interest rates to combat inflation.
China lockdowns .. Heavy lockdowns in Beijing still have not materialized. Shanghai is continuing to open up and factory production is recovering but caution will remain not just until it reaches pre-lockdown levels but until the risk of further shutdowns in the future is eased. Though it will never be officially acknowledged by the authorities, there is a sense that the Chinese government appears to be backing off the idea of “Zero-COVID” and its resulting economic carnage. Important to remember, however: there is a link between expanding Chinese industrial activity and a rising oil price, so it’s not necessarily all “good news” for Western economies as this factor moves towards its eventual resolution.
Geopolitical .. The stalemate in the Ukraine continues with no material progress towards a ceasefire, we are now beyond a hundred days since the Russians moved in. Commodity prices (particularly oil and wheat) will maintain a pretty hard floor while the conflict is ongoing which will continue to impact inflation, as well as the supply chain crunch which is still very much a problem.
These are the issues to keep an eye on in the coming weeks. While I am not saying that stock markets will directly track positive or negative developments, the fact is that rallies, bounce-backs and apparent recoveries can probably not be fully trusted until there is more tangible turnaround in most, if not all, of them.
Other News:
All that commotion for this? .. TheS&P 500 moved at least 2% on eight of the 21 trading days in May. It bottomed out hard on May 19th. Things felt very volatile, there were some crazy days of movement in both directions. Yet the index ended May at 4,132, just a single point higher than than the 4,131 close on the last trading day of April. As Barrons put it last week, it's a violently flat market out there.
Scary banker talk .. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said the bank is preparing for an “economic hurricane,” and warned investors that they needed to “brace” for it. Dimon told a financial conference the economy is facing a range of challenges, including Federal Reserve moves to combat inflation and the impacts from the war in Ukraine, as well as the fact that consumers are running out of their stimulus-driven savings cushion, spelling trouble for the economy in the not-too-distant future.
Wells Fargo CEO Charlie Scharf also raised concerns about the Fed’s inflation-fighting plans, arguing at a separate event that it will be extremely difficult for policymakers to provide a soft landing for the economy. He said that “it’s going to be hard to avoid some sort of recession”.
Goldman Sachs President and COO John Waldron warned that we are living through “the most complex and dynamic environment” he had ever seen, with “unprecedented factors” hurting the economy.
Meanwhile, at the other end of the spectrum of understanding anything whatsoever about financial markets, Elon Musk said he has a “super bad feeling” about the economy. Cheers, Elon. Eloquent and insightful as always.
Housing about to cool off? .. Houses listed for sale increased last month for the first time in almost three years, suggesting the tightness in the U.S. real estate market might be easing. The inventory of homes actively for sale on a typical day in May rose 8% from a year ago, a gain of 38k homes. The last time listings increased month-to-month was when Lil Nas X and Billy Ray Cyrus were seen heading down Old Town Road in June 2019.
The amount of newly-listed homes rose by 6.3%, also the most since 2019. The total number of unsold homes, those either previously listed or in various stages of the selling process, fell 3.9% year-over-year, but that was a lot less of a decline than the 10.9% year-on-year fall recorded in April.
However, sellers continue to demand top dollar, with the median listing price for active listings at an all-time high of $447k. That’s a jump of more than 17% from last year and over 35% from May 2020.
Under The Hood:
The sizable drop in Selling Pressure early in the week to a recent new low is a promising element of potential trend change. However, it is important to remember that Selling Pressure had just reached its latest in a series of new highs as recently as May 12.
We are still awaiting full capitulation to signal a possible bottom, with heavy and completely indiscriminate selling combined with a noticeable and sustained spike in trading volume and the VIX measure of market risk and volatility likely rising to the 40 level (I now track this on a weekly basis in this report and you can see below that it ended last week below 25).
Desperately focusing on trying to catch the exact market bottom is a stupid and futile exercise. Remember that it is always preferable and more profitable to be later to a new bull trend, with greater conviction and more evidence, than early with less of both.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
While there are no major companies reporting earnings this week, Pfizer is holding an investor meeting and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) hosts a financial analyst day.
The big economic-data highlight next week will be the critical latest U.S. inflation reading, coming out on Friday. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is expected to have climbed 0.7% in May, for a 8.2% year-over-year increase. Excluding food and energy components, the core CPI is seen rising 0.4% last month and 6% from a year earlier. Meaningful deviation from these expectations in either direction could cause considerable volatility one way or another.
Other data out next week will include the Consumer Sentiment Index for June and the European Central Bank’s possibly impactful monetary-policy decision.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 32% (up from 20% the previous week)
→Neutral: 31% (up from 27% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 37% (down from 53% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 5 (Bearish by 33 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). All numbers rounded.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - up 1.1%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group) for the second week in a row - down 3.2%
The NASDAQ-100 slightly outperformed the S&P 500
The US Market was outperformed by all overseas markets, particularly Emerging Markets
Small Cap fell by less than Mid or Large
Growth somewhat outperformed Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 186 and fell by 6 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure ended Friday at 180 and rose by 2 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 50. SPY ended the week 14.0% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022)
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 49. QQQ ended the week 24.2% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021)
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical short term rebound and above 70 are considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical short term decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Each week I'll link to an interesting article I have come across recently.
This week: The important distinction between lies and b**t.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
PERSONAL CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES (PCE) INDEX
The term personal consumption expenditures (PCEs) refers to a measure of imputed household expenditures defined for a period of time. Personal income, PCEs, and the PCE Price Index reading are released monthly in the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) Personal Income and Outlays report. Personal consumption expenditures support the reporting of the PCE Price Index, which measures price changes in consumer goods and services exchanged in the U.S. economy.
In 2012, the PCE Price Index became the primary inflation index used by the U.S. Federal Reserve when making monetary policy decisions. It is comparable to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which also focuses on consumer prices. Other measures of inflation also tracked by economists can include the Producer Price Index (PPI) and the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Price Index.
Personal consumption expenditures are among the three main parts of the Personal Income and Outlays report. Personal income shows how much money consumers earn. Personal consumption expenditures are a measure of the outlays or how much consumers spend.
The PCE Price Index uses the personal consumption expenditures component of the Personal Income and Outlays report to derive the PCE Price Index, which is the third major component of Personal Income and Outlays showing how prices are periodically inflating or deflating.
Personal consumption expenditures are shown by the BEA in current dollars and chained dollars since 2012. Personal consumption expenditures form the basis for the reporting of the PCE Price Index, which is detailed both comprehensively using all categories of PCE and excluding food and energy, which is known as the Core PCE Price Index.
Like most economic breakdowns, PCEs are split between consumer goods and services. The BEA reports the total value of personal consumption expenditures collectively every month. This is broken down by goods, durable goods, nondurable goods, and services.
Durable goods are pricier items that last longer than three years. Examples of durable goods include cars, electronics, appliances, furniture, and other similar items. Non-durable goods have a life expectancy that is less than three years. These items, which generally cost less, include things like makeup, gasoline, and clothing.
The BEA uses the current dollar value of PCEs to calculate the PCE Price Index. This index shows the price inflation or deflation that occurs from one period to the next. Like most price indexes, the PCE Price Index must incorporate a deflator (the PCE deflator) and real values in order to determine the amount of periodic price change.
Both the PCE Price Index and Core PCE Price Index (excluding food and energy) show how much the prices of personal consumption expenditures change from one period to another, but breakdowns of the PCE Price Index also show PCE inflation/deflation by category as well.
PCE vs. CPI .. The CPI is the most well-known economic indicator and usually gets a lot more attention from the media. But the Federal Reserve prefers to use the PCE Price Index when gauging inflation and the overall economic stability of the United States.
There are other indicators that are used to measure inflation, including the Producer Price Index and the GDP Price Index.
So why does the Fed prefer the PCE Price Index? That's because this metric is composed of a broad range of expenditures. The PCE Price Index is also weighted by data acquired through business surveys, which tend to be more reliable than the consumer surveys used by the CPI. The CPI, on the other hand, provides more granular transparency in its monthly reporting. As such, economists can more clearly see categories like cereal, fruit, apparel, and vehicles.
Another difference between the PCE Price Index and CPI is that the PCE Price Index uses a formula that allows for changes in consumer behavior and changes that occur in the short term. These adjustments are not made in the CPI formula.
These factors result in a more comprehensive metric for measuring inflation. The Federal Reserve depends on the nuances that the PCE Price Index reveals because even minimal inflation can be considered an indicator of a growing and healthy economy.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results or outcomes. The material contained herein is insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors has reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, Anglia Advisors has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of this content nor the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, the risk of accessing these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The historic seven-week losing streak for both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ was finally broken. The NASDAQ took the lead last week, up a stellar 6.8% but all the major US indexes were up by more than 6%.
The week began with the market happy to hear that President Biden may consider easing or eliminating a number of the Trump-era trade tariffs on Chinese goods, while also announcing a new economic agreement with twelve Indo-Pacific nations, a pact between countries who represent a combined 40% of global GDP.
Back on the stock exchanges; in a move that would have sent chills up the spine of other firms dependent on such digital advertising-related revenue models, Snapchat parent SNAP became the latest stock to get destroyed in a matter of hours - crashing over 43% on Tuesday alone after missing earnings and giving miserable guidance. The implication was that digital advertising spending has likely peaked, partly because how quick and easy it is to simply cancel paying for digital ads with local TV and radio advertising usually following shortly after.
This dragged many other high growth, long-duration companies with low but volatile revenue and profitability down with it on Tuesday (Pinterest lost a quarter of its value in a day and Meta/Facebook tumbled as well).
The recent calamity of the Target (TGT) and Walmart (WMT) earnings the previous week had the market holding its collective breath ahead of a slew of other retailers’ earnings announcements early last week. Some of the numbers surprised to the upside but the ferocity of the rebound and rally in retail stocks and beyond that began on Wednesday surprised many observers.
It’s important to remember also that in this environment these relief rallies for retailers can be a double-edged sword, as they show a consumer that is still happy to spend heavily, casting some doubt on the rather trendy “inflation has peaked” narrative.
The sense was that this was a primarily a short-covering rally, which is not “real” buying, what it is is institutions booking profits on these stocks which they correctly believed were going to be slammed. Indeed, when you zoom out a bit and look at the charts for beyond a few days or weeks, many of these stocks actually still look in terrible shape.
Rebounds primarily led by the most beaten-down names like this one are always the most suspect kinds. Short-coverers, day traders and short-term dip-buyers will start by selecting these kind of names to buy and this is what I mean by “not real buying” as these participants are not playing the same game as the rest of us.
As is often the case, investors viewed subsequent data through the prism of the price action at the time and acted accordingly. A good example of this was the release of a report showing U.S. households boosted spending for a fourth straight month - rising by 0.9% in April. As discussed before, this can be good news (evidence of a still-strong economy) or bad news (higher consumer spending = higher inflation = higher interest rates) depending on the prevailing narrative at that moment, but last week the market decided it was a positive and stocks continued roaring upwards.
The release of the minutes from the last Fed meeting lacked a nasty surprise, which was also viewed as a net positive. Going into the minutes release, the futures market was showing a 60% chance of Fed funds interest rates ending the year at 2.50%–2.75% and a 33% chance of 2.75%–3.00%. These levels barely moved after the release of the minutes while the stock market marched on.
Each quarter’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measure of US national economic growth gets three “takes”, as a movie director might say. Each take is a more complete number than the prior one, with the third take being the official final number.
Take 2 of the Q1 2022 GDP came in last week at minus 1.5% compared with a Take 1 reading of down 1.0% and the new expectation for the final Take 3 is a fall of 1.4%, which - if confirmed - would be the worst quarterly growth since the second quarter of 2020, when output contracted 31.2%.
This is important because of course a formal recession is deemed to be two consecutive quarters of negative growth. This will be the first of those if Take 3 ends up negative.
The advice remains unchanged. Those with longer time horizons (say, anything twelve years plus) should continue to lean into all this, at a minimum maintaining their level of ongoing systematic purchases of either pure index funds or smart factor-based funds in an ETF wrapper (or index mutual funds in a retirement account). Avoid expensive actively managed funds and keep funds packed with high growth/low profit “2020 pandemic-type” holdings to an absolute minimum. And it hopefully goes without saying to stay away from any single-stock picking.
If cash flow permits, I believe you should actually be increasing your level of buying of these investments in your longer term accounts, loading up more heavily at currently lower prices.
Money with a time horizon of less than two years should not be in the stock market at all. High Yield Savings accounts at places like Marcus, Betterment, Ally etc are now paying around twice the interest that they were at the beginning of the year. It’s still very low (and a lot less than inflation) but there is essentially zero risk to the value of your principal as long as you keep within the FDIC insurance limit. Also, if you haven’t yet done so, look into US government I Bonds as a place to put money for over a year, currently paying a mouth-watering tax-advantaged 9.62% interest.
Other News:
Cooling off, fast .. In a clear recession warning for the overall economy, new single-family home sales dropped 16.6% in April, massively worse than expected (average estimates were for less than a 2% decline). It was the fourth straight monthly decline and the biggest month-over-month slide since Robin Thicke blurred lines in 2013. New home sales have clearly been hurt by soaring prices and rapidly-rising mortgage rates, making homes much less affordable with most would-be first-time buyers being totally sidelined. The median sales price of a new home in April was $450,600, up 19.6% from a year ago.
Coupled with last week’s fall in existing home sales, there are clear signs that the residential real estate market is rapidly slowing down and no-one is seriously expecting anything other than further sales declines in the coming months.
Back to the office? Er, not really .. US office occupancy remains stuck in neutral, according to the latest data from Kastle Systems, the leading provider of office security systems and software. Its latest Ten Cities Workplace Occupancy Report shows only a 43.4% office occupancy rate nationwide and with COVID cases rising again in many locations, the next few weeks may well see fewer and fewer people working in offices.
Indeed, this is already happening in office markets like New York City, which was down last week to just a 38.2% occupancy rate and with summer now officially under way, these rates are unlikely to tick back up again until after Labor Day at the earliest. Kastle noted in its report that the trajectory of the data “suggests that these occupancy rates might be the new normal for businesses nationwide”.
“Take your job and stick it” .. The boom in the number of people changing jobs following the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic known as The Great Resignation (see FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) is showing no sign of slowing down, according to research by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). The consulting firm’s survey of 52,000 workers in 44 countries and territories found one in five indicated they would likely move to another job in the next 12 months.
The survey also indicated 35% of respondents said they are planning to ask for a salary increase over the next year, although finding fulfillment at work was just as important as compensation. PwC said workers are not just looking for decent pay, they want more control over how they work and want to derive greater meaning from what they do. Employees also care about where they work, with 47% noting that was a priority for them. It added that in order to avoid losing staff, businesses must do more to improve their workers’ skills, which will help provide more of the job control employees are seeking.
Under The Hood:
While it is undeniable that last week saw the emergence of some positive short term divergences to the still unhealthy longer term under-the-hood indicators (particularly Buying Power crossing into a dominant position over Selling Pressure), no real leadership emerged, it was the most damaged stocks that bounced the hardest which is exactly what you would expect in a rally with little more behind it than being simply a reaction to an oversold condition where things had fallen too far, too fast (remember, we are coming off seven straight weeks of falling markets, which is almost unheard of).
Following last week’s strong rally, we are now far above over-sold levels (see the RSI readings below in LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS), so that particular source of rocket fuel to stock prices has now been shut off. The evidence continues to point to the market process of decline still being in place with no compelling evidence of an imminent sustainable reversal apparent in any of the key intermediate- or long-term indicators.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
U.S. stock and bond markets will be closed on Monday for Memorial Day.
Just a handful of major companies report their earnings next week, including Hewlett Packard, Salesforce.com, Lululemon, CrowdStrike, Enterprise and, yes, GameStop.
There are also several annual shareholders’ meetings scheduled for next week, including Alphabet/Google, Comcast, Walmart, Nvidia, PayPal and what may be a spicy one at Netflix.
The big piece of economic data next week is the jobs report on Friday. Economists' average forecast is for a gain of 317k jobs and for an unemployment rate of 3.5%.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 20% (down from 24% the previous week)
→Neutral: 27% (down from 26% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 53% (up from 50% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 33 (Bearish by 26 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). All numbers rounded.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Discretionary (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - up 10.0%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Healthcare (two biggest holdings: Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group) - up 3.6%
The NASDAQ-100 slightly outperformed the S&P 500
US Markets comfortably outperformed all overseas markets
There was virtually no difference between the performance of Large, Mid and Small Cap
Growth outperformed Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 192 and rose by 25 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure ended Friday at 178 and fell by 27 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 48. SPY ended the week 13.0% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022)
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and also remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 45. QQQ ended the week 23.5% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021)
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical short term rebound and above 70 are considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical short term decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Each week I'll link to an interesting article I have come across recently.
This week: Estate planning is having real problems keeping up with societal trends and changes and a lot of people are at risk if they don’t plan.
Shameless plug: Anglia Advisors can help you put together a great estate plan, just get in touch.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
THE GREAT RESIGNATION
The Great Resignation describes the elevated rate at which U.S. workers have quit their jobs starting in the spring of 2021, amid strong labor demand and low unemployment as vaccinations eased the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic. Anthony Klotz, a professor of business administration at Texas A&M University, coined the term in May 2021, attributing the phenomenon to pent up demand from workers who deferred decisions to quit earlier in the pandemic.
Though each individual’s reasons for changing jobs or leaving the workforce are tied to personal circumstances, there is no question that the arrival of COVID-19 and related job losses immediately curbed voluntary exits by employees. The quits rate tracking voluntary separations from employment for reasons other than retirement plunged from a typical 2.3% in February 2020 to 1.6% two months later in the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
Employees often quit jobs after accepting a better one elsewhere, so to a large extent the drop reflected the decline in hiring for new positions. Others undoubtedly delayed a planned exit, whether to start their own business or for another reason, amid the economic turmoil at the outset of the pandemic.
With the arrival of COVID-19 vaccines and the accompanying economic rebound, hiring has picked up, even as those who delayed quitting for other reasons finally felt comfortable about proceeding.
Some have suggested the quits rate may also have risen for other reasons tied to the COVID-19 pandemic:
Pandemic experiences led some workers to re-evaluate life priorities and reduce working hours or leave the labor force entirely.
Employers demanded employees return to the office after allowing remote work in 2020.
Mistreatment by employers and customers during the pandemic pushed workers to leave as other options became available.
The labor force participation rate has been slow to recover from pandemic lows, fueling the competition for workers.
Some people left work because they could not obtain childcare as schools shifted to remote learning, while others did so because they wouldn't comply with workplace COVID-19 vaccination requirements.
Notably, though, the top reasons given by the workers who quit in a Pew Research Center survey conducted in February 2022 were low pay and a lack of advancement opportunities, suggesting many left for a better offer.
Harvard economist Jason Furman argued in June 2021 that the elevated rate of people leaving their jobs was in line with the rising number of job openings, suggesting competition among employers was driving resignations.
A record 4.5 million workers quit jobs for reasons other than retirement in March 2022, representing an increase of 152,000 from February 2022, according to JOLTS data. Job openings of 11.55 million at the end of March were also the highest on record.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results or outcomes. The material contained herein is insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors has reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, Anglia Advisors has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of this content nor the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, the risk of accessing these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The focus of major market participants zoomed in from the macro to the micro last week, from China/Ukraine to Walmart/Target.
Equity prices continued to fall because markets are clearly undergoing a reset of expectations about corporate earnings and are become concerned about what these will look like in the upcoming few quarters, particularly if an aggressive Fed increases interest rates too far and too fast.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average experienced its eighth straight weekly loss, the longest such streak since 1932, near the height of the Great Depression. The S&P 500 and NASDAQ are on their own longest streak of weekly losses since Shaggy (featuring Ricardo ‘Rikrok’ Ducent) told us that it wasn’t him in 2001, after the dot-com bubble burst.
Investors are drawing a line in the sand when it comes to real, tangible earnings vs. vague promises of possible future earnings one day which is why the stocks of the likes of Peloton, Sofi, DocuSign, Robin Hood, Snapchat, Teladoc, Coinbase and the rest have been targeted and demolished. Investors have simply run out of patience with their b**t.
But last week the pain spread well beyond just the technology and high growth/no earnings stocks. It all began with the US Retail Sales report showing a 0.9% increase in April, exceeding analysts’ average estimates. Excluding autos, they were higher by 0.6%. Sales from the previous month were also revised upward to an increase of 1.4% from the previous 0.7%, however sales declines were reported at gas stations, food/beverage stores, sporting goods and book stores as well as building materials.
The problem with drawing positive conclusions from total retail sales numbers can be shown in microcosm by the Home Depot (HD) Q1 2022 earnings report. The average amount spent per transaction by customers in their stores rose by 11.4% making for a nice bump in revenues generated per customer. But the number of transactions fell 8.2%. The market promptly kicked the s**t out of the stock.
Things went from bad to worse when first Walmart (WMT) and then Target (TGT) announced weak earnings but, more importantly, executives for both firms gave extremely downbeat expectations of their future profitability prospects. Both stocks were immediately taken behind the woodshed and dealt with in the customary fashion. The huge problem is that, along with the likes of Home Depot, these are discount retailers and are simply unable to pass higher wholesale inflation costs on to their retail customers in the way that, say, Louis Vuitton or even Tesla can.
On an Investor Day as recently as March this year, Target had reiterated its previous highly optimistic forecasts and forward guidance. So the market’s other concern upon hearing all this was not just how much worse retail business conditions and earnings prospects have gotten, but how quickly they have fallen to get there.
Contagion quickly spread from a few retailers (Macy’s, Nordstroms and Kohls also took a kicking) to the entire American corporate ecosystem and Wednesday saw a bloodbath with no place to hide as markets latched on to any piece of bad news they could find. And there was a lot to pick from.
Wells Fargo Investment Institute cut their 2022 US GDP target from 2.2% to 1.5% while revising their 2023 GDP target down from plus 0.4% to minus 0.5%. Meanwhile, they kept their inflation target unchanged at 7.7%. Standard & Poor’s released their own updated U.S. growth outlook, it was down to 2.2% from 3.2% and cited “negative shocks”. UBS Group announced that it is pricing in a 40% chance of a recession. The Consumer Staples sector, traditionally a kind of hiding place when markets fall, showed itself to be the exact opposite of that last week.
Even American COVID made its way back into investors’ psyche, with New York City hitting a high transmission level and going back to an official High Alert status on the same day that we learned that manufacturing activity in New York State had dramatically and unexpectedly fallen.
Just a couple of weeks ago, in my weekly report titled “Rushing for the Exits”, I wrote; “I suspect many institutional and hedge fund traders are getting destroyed by this volatility and my guess is that in the coming weeks, we will hear about some blow-up casualties”.
Even I was not expecting to hear anything this big this quickly, though. Melvin Capital, a massive $7.8 billion stock-picking hedge fund (famous for having been the prime target of the meme-stock Reddit crowd last year) shut down for good last week with founder Gabe Plotkin admitting that the last 17 months had been “an incredibly trying time” and that “I now recognize that I need to step away from managing external capital”. Ya think?
There was actually some good news on the other side of the ledger though, such as Shanghai's authorities confirming that it had met the goal of three straight days of zero COVID transmissions outside of quarantined areas continuing to raise hopes of an easing of the Chinese lockdown situation and the possibility of a smidge of supply chain chaos relief. Also, the possibility that inflation may have peaked appeared to at least be being considered by the bond market with 10 year Treasury interest rates steadying and even falling a bit.
The search for the stock market bottom continues. On Friday, the S&P 500 finally slipped into bear market territory (see FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) in the early afternoon, down over 20% from its recent high. But a furious late rally meant that it did not close there. We can leave the niceties of whether a bear market is officially under way as the result of an intraday -20% or whether it’s the closing price that counts to Wall Street technicians, but it is interesting to note that, since 1950, one month after a bear market level has been breached, the S&P 500 has been higher 83% of the time and one year later, the index has been higher 75% of the time, with an average gain of 17%.
Other News:
Time is money - literally .. Buyers of new construction properties are facing higher costs while they wait for their homes to be completed. People who agreed to buy homes under construction but haven’t yet closed are facing mortgage-interest rates that could be close to double what they counted on when they went into contract and paid their deposits, while builders struggle with supply chain issues and rapidly increasing prices for their materials and labor. Upset borrowers, so far, have been grudgingly willing to absorb all these unanticipated additional costs in order to keep their purchase, but the market for newly-built homes is unlikely to be able to maintain current price levels for a whole lot longer under these conditions.
Existing home sales tailing off .. Sales of existing homes fell in April to the lowest level since the early months of the COVID outbreak as skyrocketing prices and mortgage rates clearly deterred potential buyers. Existing home sales fell 2.4% from the month before to an annualized rate of 5.61 million, the fewest since June 2020, with more sales declines expected in the coming months.
The median price for an existing home in the US hit a record $391,200, that’s 14.8% higher than a year ago. It was the 122nd consecutive month of year-over-year increases, the longest streak of gains on record. Along with elevated prices, those looking to buy a home are facing interest rates that are near levels not seen in almost 13 years. The average rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage is now 5.25%.
Is he poor yet? .. Do Kwon, the trash-talking South Korean entrepreneur who previously refused to address the many concerns about the crypto stable-coin TerraUS/Luna that he founded, by announcing “I don’t debate the poor” and an enthusiastic adopter of the crypto bros’ favorite meme aimed at the rest of us, “Have fun staying poor”, sent a pseudo-apologetic tweet out last week aimed at the multitude of people and households who have lost their life savings after the complete collapse (that I reported and linked to details of in last week’s review, Other News - Crypto Edition) of what he called his “dearest creation named after my greatest invention” . He also named what was presumably his second-dearest creation, his daughter Luna, after it.
Unable to be comforted by his charming tweet, however, are the estimated 20 people so far from around the world who have apparently already committed suicide as a result of the failure of this doomed Ponzi scheme. When are some of these fraudsters from the darker corners of the crypto universe going to serve some jail-time for the consequences of the damaging stunts they are pulling?
Under The Hood:
Maybe the most difficult (yet very important) task in the market right now is the need for investors to distinguish between intensifying selling and capitulation / liquidation. If you mistake the former for the latter, it could prove costly. Mistaking the latter for the former could lead to a possible opportunity cost. The weight of the technical evidence still points to heavy declines being more likely to be evidence of intensifying selling which is by definition the continued deterioration of bear market rather than capitulation/liquidation which could mark the elusive bottom from which markets catapult higher.
Until that weight shifts to the other side of the ledger, the working assumption should be that the direction of least resistance (periodic short-lived over-sold rallies not withstanding) remains downward in the shorter/intermediate term. Trends in the key under-the-hood indicators do not point to gathering strength at this time.
The divergence between Lowry’s Buying Power and Selling Pressure, currently solidly in favor of the sellers and whose progress I document each week in the LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS section of this weekly report, needs to narrow considerably to begin to shift that weight in favor of a resumption of an upward trend.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
Q1 2022 earnings season winds down next week, but there are still around a dozen S&P 500 companies left to report, with a distinctly retail feel to it, like Costco, Macy’s, Gap, Best Buy, AutoZone, Advance Auto Parts, Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Ulta Beauty and Dick’s Sporting Goods. After last week’s turmoil with Walmart and Target, these will be watched closely. Also reporting from beyond retail-world are Nvidia, Alibaba, Snowflake, Dell, Zoom and Toll Brothers.
There will also be several investor days and annual shareholders’ meetings next week, including from JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Exxon-Mobil, Meta/Facebook, United Airlines and, interestingly, Twitter.
Nothing earth-shattering on tap next week on the economic data release front. The manufacturing and services purchasing managers’ indexes, the durable goods report and personal income and spending data will be released.
The minutes from the Federal Open Market Committee's monetary policy meeting earlier this month, at which the Fed’s benchmark interest rate target was increased by half a percent, will be published on Wednesday.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
↑Bullish: 26% (up from 24% the previous week)
→Neutral: 24% (down from 26% the previous week)
↓Bearish: 50% (unchanged from 50% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. ↓Bearish by 24 (Bearish by 26 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). All numbers rounded.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron) - up 1.5%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Staples (two biggest holdings: Proctor & Gamble, Coca-Cola) - down 7.9%
The NASDAQ-100 once again had a significantly worse week than the S&P 500
US Markets severely underperformed all overseas markets last week
Small and Mid Cap performed less badly than Large Cap
Once again, Growth hugely underperformed Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power is currently at 167 and rose by 3 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure ended Friday at 205 and fell by 2 points over the course of the week
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is well below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and remains a long way below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 36. SPY ended the week 18.4% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022)
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is well below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and remains a long way below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 35. QQQ ended the week 28.5% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021)
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical short term rebound and above 70 are considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical short term decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Each week I'll link to an interesting article I have come across recently.
This week: You often hear the terms “secular” and “cyclical” thrown around when it comes to financial markets.The distinction between the two is important to understand.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
BEAR MARKET
A bear market is when a market experiences prolonged price declines. It typically describes a condition in which securities prices fall 20% or more from recent highs amid widespread pessimism and negative investor sentiment.
Bear markets are often associated with declines in an overall market or index like the S&P 500, but individual securities or commodities can also be considered to be in a bear market if they experience a decline of 20% or more over a sustained period of time—typically two months or more. Bear markets also may accompany general economic downturns such as a recession. Bear markets may be contrasted with upward-trending bull markets.
Stock prices generally reflect future expectations of cash flows and profits from companies. As growth prospects wane, and expectations are dashed, prices of stocks can decline. Herd behavior, fear, and a rush to protect downside losses can lead to prolonged periods of depressed asset prices.
One definition of a bear market says markets are in bear territory when stocks, on average, fall at least 20% off their high. But 20% is an arbitrary number, just as a 10% decline is an arbitrary benchmark for a correction. Another definition of a bear market is when investors are more risk-averse than risk-seeking. This kind of bear market can last for months or years as investors shun speculation in favor of boring, sure bets.
The causes of a bear market vary, but in general, a weak or slowing or sluggish economy, bursting market bubbles, pandemics, wars, geopolitical crises, and drastic paradigm shifts in the economy such as shifting to online economy, are all factors that might cause a bear market. The signs of a weak or slowing economy are typically low employment, low disposable income, weak productivity, and a drop in business profits.
For example, changes in the tax rate or in the federal funds rate can lead to a bear market. Similarly, a drop in investor confidence may also signal the onset of a bear market. When investors believe something is about to happen, they will take action—in this case, selling off shares to avoid losses.
Bear markets can last for multiple years or just several weeks. A secular bear market can last anywhere from 10 to 20 years and is characterized by below-average returns on a sustained basis. There may be rallies within secular bear markets where stocks or indexes rally for a period, but the gains are not sustained, and prices revert to lower levels. A cyclical bear market, on the other hand, can last anywhere from a few weeks to several months (for more about this distinction, see the ARTICLE OF THE WEEK above).
The U.S. major market indexes were close to bear market territory on December 24, 2018, falling just shy of a 20% drawdown. More recently, major indexes including the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) fell sharply into bear market territory between March 11 and March 12, 2020.3 Prior to that, the last prolonged bear market in the United States occurred between 2007 and 2009 during the Financial Crisis and lasted for roughly 17 months. The S&P 500 lost 50% of its value during that time.
In February 2020, global stocks entered a sudden bear market in the wake of the global coronavirus pandemic, sending the DJIA down 38% from its all-time high on February 12 (29,568.77) to a low on March 23 (18,213.65) in just over one month. However, both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ-100 had fully recovered and made new highs by August 2020.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific point in time and is always subject to change. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute any kind of a guarantee of any future results or outcomes. The material contained herein is insufficient to be exclusively relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors has reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, Anglia Advisors has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of this content nor the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, the risk of accessing these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
The stock market is fishing around for a bottom. 2021’s favorite pastime, BTFD, stopped working a while ago, dips have become dives. Plenty of stocks have fallen by 50%, paused to let the BTFD crowd come in and then promptly crushed them by dissolving another 30%-40% from there.
A sixth week in a row of lower stock prices began with the twin geopolitical headwinds of China and Ukraine tipping markets lower but the main driver of these declines appeared to be momentum, fear and, importantly, apparent forced selling (as a result of margin calls, options activity, algorithms and fund mandates), all of which fed upon themselves as they tend to do when sentiment is as universally negative as it is. By the closing bell on Tuesday, all the gains made in the last twelve months by the S&P 500 had been wiped out.
And then there’s the Fed. What has often brought past bear markets to an end has been the Federal Reserve’s willingness to inject loads of excess liquidity to support asset prices and bolster domestic activity. But given where inflation is, none of that is going to happen any time soon. As one analyst put it; “Rather than being investors’ friend, the Fed has now become a foe, intent on tightening monetary conditions. One can debate how aggressive it will be, but the Fed is unlikely to help out soon.”
Here’s the latest state of play in that very debate. The positioning of aggregated fixed income traders’ futures positions gives us the following probabilities for what the Fed will do the rest of the year.
0.50% interest rate increase at the June 15th meeting (87% odds)
0.50% interest rate increase at the July 27th meeting (81% odds)
0.50% interest rate increase at the September 21st meeting (51% odds), with 0.25% a possibility (38% odds)
0.25% interest rate increase at the November 2nd and December 14th meetings, with combined odds of 51%, bringing the year-end Fed Funds rate to 2.75% – 3.00%.
The point here is that deviations from these expected levels will likely trigger a market reaction. More aggressive rate hikes than expected will push the market lower and less aggressive raises could see swift, significant rallies.
But Fed actions are not the be-all and end-all. A big issue is that raising rates into a low-supply environment can decrease demand as it is intended to do, but it doesn’t solve the lack of supply. The reasons for that lie in idle, backed-up shipping ports around the world, locked-down Chinese cities and on the battlefields of Ukraine. None of which the Fed can do anything about.
Real US interest rates are finally positive again. Real rates are the difference between nominal rates and expected future inflation. For example, with the 10-year Treasury rate at 3.0% and expected 10-year future inflation at 2.7% (according to Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, TIPS, pricing), then real interest rates are +0.3%. This is important because, while the transition to positive real rates can be painful since it sends bond prices lower as discussed in last weeks report, it means we may be through the most painful part of that process now and that is good news for holders of bond funds
But remember, there’s a flip-side to this. The argument for holding stocks becomes less attractive when investors have, for the first time in a long while, an essentially risk-free alternative on their hands that actually pays a positive real rate of return.
Nevertheless, Bank of America strategists last week were the first to come out and suggest that the recent sell-off shows that the stock market may have reached “true capitulation” [see FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below] - usually a pre-requisite to a sustained recovery in stock prices.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of US retail inflation rose 0.3% in April and was up 8.3% from a year earlier, the Labor Department said last week. The previous year-over-year inflation rate had been 8.5%. So, directionally the headline rate is going the right way. But more worrying, "core inflation," which excludes volatile food and energy, surged ahead by 0.6%. That number was an acceleration from March’s 0.3%. Even more concerning is that this hot core reading was driven mostly by an increase in the cost of non-energy services and not goods.
This spreading of inflation pressures away from goods and into services is a troubling sign as supply chain problems can't be so easily blamed and the resulting sense is that the Fed will need to, as one analyst put it, “act harder and act faster”. The obvious risk is that the more aggressive the Fed gets, the more likely it is that the economy tips into a recession.
Things weren’t helped the next day when it was announced that inflation at the wholesale level rose more than expected in April, pushed higher by rising commodity and energy prices. The Producer Price Index (PPI) rose at a year-on-year rate of 11.0% last month, worse than economists’ estimates and March’s number was revised upward to 11.5%. The silver lining? The PPI core annualized rate of wholesale inflation, leaving out volatile food and energy prices, was “only” up 8.8%, which was less than forecast.
And then there was Friday. Stock markets catapulted higher, turning a catastrophic week into simply a bad one. It was brought about by a couple of things, firstly an oversold environment with RSI readings having dipped below 30 (see LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below) but another catalyst was that we finally got some positive news concerning one of the three main market drivers (China, Ukraine and the Fed) as Chinese authorities dangled the possibility of a lifting of some of its more dramatic lockdowns (including in Shanghai) by May 20th.
When this market does eventually bottom out, it will look and feel rather like it did on Friday. However, that does not necessarily mean that Friday was the market bottoming out. Indeed, avid readers of the Under The Hood part of this report will know that conditions specifically do NOT point to this being the bottom.
An important question is, who was doing the buying on Friday? Professional institutional traders forced into buying by margin calls to cover short positions or by options hedging? High frequency traders looking for a quick scalp who will have sold everything they bought on Friday before lunch on Monday? Battered BTFD’ers giving it one final try? Or actual investors who genuinely feel we have now reached the bottom and it’s finally time to start loading up again on stocks in a fully washed-out market?
Unfortunately, we won’t know the answer to this until knowing it is of no practical use.
Other News (Digital Edition):
Crypto’s horror week ..
Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency, hit a peak price of around $68,000 in November 2021. On Friday last week, the price fell to $29,300. Similar (indeed worse) declines have occurred everywhere across the entire crypto eco-system. As reported last week in the Wall Street Journal, over a trillion dollars (that’s $1 + twelve zeros) of crypto has simply vanished in losses over those six months.
Until last Friday, Bitcoin had essentially become indistinguishable in its price movements from tech stocks. Its recent correlation to the NASDAQ index was 82%. The different thing about this crypto crash as opposed to the countless number of previous ones is that now two-thirds of crypto volumes come not from retail, entitled, backwards-baseball-cap-wearing, rich-kid bros born on third base in California any more but by real institutional money, including hedge funds. The biggest owners of Bitcoin now also own grandad stocks like Exxon, Coca Cola, IBM and GE. But these funds also own lots of the incinerated stocks like Peloton, Shopify, Zoom, Sofi etc on margin and leveraged which is absolutely killing them and they need to sell stuff to meet margin calls. Selling some Paypal stock isn’t exactly going to raise much $$, so many are selling crypto instead.
Coinbase’s trading volumes fell more than 40 per cent in the first quarter, net losses of $430m were reported, far greater than the $47m expected by Wall Street analysts. Revenues were far worse than expectations too. The company’s investors have run out of patience, headed for the exits and told the firm that they are no longer prepared to listen to any more empty promises about “potential” future profits. With its stock price down 80% from its IPO, Coinbase Global CEO Brian Armstrong even had to come out and deny that the company was at risk of bankruptcy, barely a year after going public.
Why is this so important? Because, in its10-Q filing, Coinbase revealed that customers who custody their crypto with the company would be treated as unsecured creditors in the event of a bankruptcy. Translation? Your investment held on the platform can be taken from you by Coinbase in the case of bankruptcy and used by them to pay off their creditors. You could lose up to .. everything.
The Ponzi scheme built on cotton candy and Tinkerbell’s fairy dust known as the TerraUSD “stable”coin (see here for an explainer of what it is and what happened to it last week), designed to be pegged 1-to-1 to the fiat U.S. dollar and therefore always have a $1.00 value, broke last week and saw its price plunge to 11 cents - showing that crypto world can suffer destabilizing “runs on the bank” just like the real world. The coin’s outspoken creator, Do Kwon, directed that huge sums of money be spent to try to rescue this vanity project of his and pleaded for help from his army of Twitter followers, helpfully pointing out that he was “gonna keep making noise”. I’m sure that was a real comfort to investors. So far the contagion does not yet seem to have spread meaningfully to other so-called stablecoins like Tether, USDC and Binance USD but there are a lot of nervous bros out there right now.
The NFT market is in the process of totally disintegrating. NFTs are digital tokens that act like a certificates of ownership that live on a blockchain. The sale of non-fungible tokens fell to a daily average of about 19,000 last week, a 92% decline from the peak last September according to the data website, NonFungible. The number of active wallets in the NFT market has fallen 88% to about 14,000 last week from a high of more than 119,000 in November. A NFT of the first tweet from Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey sold in March 2021 for $2.9 million to Sina Estavi, the chief executive of some Malaysia-based blockchain company. Estavi then put the same NFT up for auction earlier this year and the highest bid he saw was less than $14,000.
Crypto myths busted .. “Crypto is an inflation hedge”. Er, no it isn’t. It’s been heading steadily lower the whole time that inflation has been ripping higher. Just overlay the chart of one on the other for definitive proof that we can toss this myth out of the window.
“The days of the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency are numbered”. Hmmm, the USD Index just hit its highest level since 2002 and is up almost 10% just since February. The world has hardly ever wanted dollars as badly as it does now, which does indicate significant global risk aversion. When the world is this hungry for “safe” dollars, you know that “return on capital” is not foremost in investors’ minds, “return of capital” is. Risky assets like crypto have been jettisoned.
El Salvador’s bonkers decision last September to make Bitcoin legal tender in the country is coming back to bite. Hard. Praised by giddy crypto bros safely chilling in their smart homes in the US as forward-thinking and genius at the time, the move has recently caused the country’s international credit rating to get slashed to international junk status which raises the interest it now has to pay on its foreign debt - right at the time that its legal currency held by millions of its citizens has just lost 50% of its value in a few months. The government, having faced understandably furious riots on its streets, now finds itself looking for a handout from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as the crypto crash has meant that it may well not even be able to meet its upcoming international debt obligations. Negotiations are not going well as the IMF has understandably said that any bailout would be contingent on El Salvador dropping its Bitcoin legal tender policy which 43-year old President Bukele seems reluctant to do, despite the economic damage caused by such a policy.
Important: None of this means that you can’t be long-term optimistic about crypto as an investment, but if you are going to wait it out, you clearly need to be ready for a lot of very frequent, very intense periods of pain over what may be a pretty long haul. If you cannot stomach somewhat regular 80%+ declines in the value of your investment with no guarantee of a bounce back at any time, then you have likely mis-allocated to the asset class. In my view, a total of 1-2% of your investable assets in crypto is perfectly fine but that should probably be the maximum for a normal human being, although of course each individual’s case is different. And maybe - given what we learned last week - you may want to look into platforms other than Coinbase to hold it (Anglia Advisors has an option available exclusively for our clients, contact me for more details).
Under The Hood:
There’s an old saying on Wall Street; A bear market doesn’t end until the last bull throws in the towel. We likely need to see total panic, blind selling and capitulation (see FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below) from the universe of trapped investors who see no other option other than dumping all their stocks as a sign that the bottom might be near. However, this kind of blow-off selling is typically accompanied by a large spike in volume.
While a small uptick in trading volume has been evident lately, it has still remained quite muted during recent large declines, suggesting what we are seeing is not yet the required level of blind panic. Having said that, the bottom will be found one day and some of the apparent capitulation on display last week may be inching us closer to it.
Consider these stats for the Russell 3000 index, which is essentially the entire US stock market .. 40% of stocks in the index have lost a third or more of their value this year, close to 20% of them are now down 80% or more from their highs and almost 10% of the index has now crashed 90% or more. Just last week alone, over 30% of NASDAQ stocks broke down to new one year lows, as did six of the S&P 500’s eleven sectors.
These is brutal data and could be interpreted (as indeed kind of happened on Friday) as indicative of things being oversold or even washed out. But, as I have described, “oversold” is not a synonym for “buyable”. Rather, it is simply a technical analysis term that means the market may have moved too far, too fast in the short term (see the RSI readings that I update weekly in LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS below). At best, it is a call for a potential opposite-direction reaction, such as we saw on Friday and is not necessarily indicative of a change in trend. Remember as well that oversold can also easily become “even more oversold”.
I think we still need to see a sustained bounce from some panic selling before we can seriously contemplate the bottom being in.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
We’re at the tail end of the Q1 2022 earnings season, but we will be hearing from Walmart, Home Depot, Target, Caterpillar, John Deere, Moderna, Cisco, Take Two Interactive, Applied Materials, TJX and Lowe’s.
The economic data highlight of the week will be the release ofApril’s retail sales data on Tuesday morning. Expectations are for a 0.8% month-over-month increase.
There will also be several housing-market indicators out next week: The National Association of Home Builders releases its housing market index for May, the Census Bureau reports new residential construction data for April and we learn about existing home sales.
====
US INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
Bullish ↑ 24% (down from 27% the previous week)
Neutral → 26% (up from 20% the previous week)
Bearish ↓ 50% (down from 53% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. Bearish ↓ by 26 (Unchanged: Bearish by 26 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). All numbers rounded.
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Consumer Staples (two biggest holdings: Proctor & Gamble, Coca-Cola) - up 0.3%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Real Estate for the second week in a row (two biggest holdings: American Tower, Prologis) - down 4.0%
The NASDAQ-100 and the S&P 500 had an identically poor week
US Markets lagged both Emerging Markets and International Developed Markets
Small Cap performed less badly than Mid which in turn performed less badly than Large Cap
Once again, Growth underperformed Value
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power rose by 3 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure rose by 4 points
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and remains well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 39. SPY ended the week 15.9% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022)
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is still below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and remains well below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 40. QQQ ended the week 25.3% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021)
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical short term rebound and above 70 are considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical short term decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Each week I'll link to an interesting article I have come across recently.
This week: You have to hand it to the stock-pickers. Like Monty Python’s Black Knight, they just keep coming back over and over again with their fake news no matter how many times a new mountain of evidence disproves their losing philosophy, no matter how many times their loudly-howled assertions are proved to be entirely wrong and no matter how many times the stock market chops off one of their arms or legs.
Ritholtz discusses their latest blame-game strategy to try to get you to invest all wrong.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
CAPITULATION
Capitulation means surrender. In financial markets, capitulation marks the point in time when a large enough proportion of investors simultaneously give up hopes of recouping recent losses, typically as the decline in prices gathers speed.
Suppose a stock you own dropped by 30% but you were sure it would bounce back. Imagine it then fell another 20% but it was clear the fundamentals were solid. Maybe you bought a little more on the dip. Now imagine the same stock is down 15% intraday and the grind of daily disappointment has given way to certain knowledge that you bought a loser that could go even lower. Selling the stock as a result would be an act of capitulation.
Note that the stock was already down 15% in a day, suggesting others felt the same. While misery may like company, a capitulation requires a panicked crowd.
Capitulation means that the sellers were "wrong" or the buyers "right." While a short-term rebound follows capitulation by definition, it doesn't mean prices can't go even lower later, if future reverses turn the new "strong hands" into sellers.
Bear markets can feature repeat high-volume plunges in price and premature calls of capitulation. The truth is that the condition can be diagnosed conclusively only in hindsight, if the price rebounds.
While capitulations can be impossible to tell apart from run-of-the-mill high-volume declines in real time, they're easy to spot with the benefit of hindsight: just look for a significant rebound in the price.
On March 18, 2020, the S&P 500 index was down nearly 10% from the prior day's close amid the COVID-19 market collapse, only to reverse and close down 5.2% on the day and 1.6% below where it opened. That wasn't quite capitulation, however, in retrospect.
On March 23, 2020, the S&P 500 plunged nearly 5% intraday at its lows but managed to close with a loss of "just" 2.9%. We know that was capitulation because the index went on to gain 17% over the next week.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific time and is always subject to change. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute a guarantee of any future results. The material is insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors has reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, Anglia Advisors has no control over, and is not responsible for, the accuracy of this content nor the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By accessing such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, the risk of going to these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
After weeks of hawkish comments by Fed Presidents and refusal to rule out much higher interest rate increases than expected, the Federal Open Market Committee raised its key policy interest rate on Wednesday by one-half percentage point as expected, to a range of 0.75%-1.00%. Central bank chief Jerome Powell lowered future rate increase expectations by effectively ruling out imminent larger hikes.
Traders began to abandon bets for a 0.75% raise in June and July and stocks rose sharply, spurred on by Powell’s (clearly planned and deliberately planted) comment in the press conference that a hike of that size “is not something the committee is actively considering”. This comment was combined with a cautiously optimistic narrative on inflation and so, by the end of Powell's 47-minute press conference, stocks were up over 2%.
The sense began to emerge that the the Fed’s bark on inflation may be worse than its bite. What the Fed seems to be doing is talking tough to try and get the market to do its work for it and push market-determined rates higher while not being seen to be taking extreme measures every month or two by jacking up the Fed Funds rate too far, too fast.
And to a large degree, this tactic has worked - the 10 year Treasury rate went above 3.0%, driven not by the Fed (which has no control over such rates) but by market traders reacting to what Fed presidents were saying almost every day in clearly co-ordinated press conferences. It ended the week well above the 3% level while the midpoint of the Fed Funds rate is still only 0.875%.
I noted in last week’s report that we are now living below the 200-day moving average in the S&P 500 and that “.. this is where the drama takes place”. Well that certainly rang true last week when, after screaming up on Fed-day (Wednesday), the bottom completely fell out on Thursday when the market gave it all back and more with an epic bad day as investors re-evaluated everything (except for energy stocks) and charged for the exits. Anecdotal evidence supports the idea that large investors and institutions are now starting to sell out of their positions rather than hedge them.
The biggest stock market drawdown during the whole of 2021 was 5%. The NASDAQ fell 5% on Thursday alone. Friday failed to provide any kind of bounce-back. Indeed, NASDAQ and Small Cap stocks made yet another leg lower going into the weekend. This extended the streak of weekly stock market losses to five weeks and that hasn’t happened in a decade.
Nothing in the Powell press conference on Wednesday was really good enough to cause a 2% rally in the S&P 500. That was driven by forced short-covering, algorithmic black box trading, options delta hedging, high-frequency trading and giddy day-traders. Similarly though, nothing really justified Thursday’s 5% drop in the NASDAQ. We are just in a wild moment in terms of market volatility.
When the dust settled on Thursday evening, the S&P 500 was down from Wednesday’s open but still above its intra-day lows from Monday. I suspect many institutional and hedge fund traders are getting destroyed by this volatility and my guess is that in the coming weeks, we will hear about some blow-up casualties. As for the basement-dwelling individual day traders messing around intra-day on their laptops with their own money, hasta la vista baby.
The stock market’s headwinds remain unchanged; a generationally hawkish Fed, and real global growth concerns and supply chain issues resulting from both the Ukraine conflict and China’s Zero-COVID policy.
Even though these risks are not getting materially worse, it doesn’t really matter any more because conversely, nothing good is happening to mitigate any of them and in a market where sentiment is this negative, that leaves the path of least resistance as clearly lower. The point being, the recent drop in stocks hasn’t been caused by a lot of incrementally negative news, it’s been caused by a total lack of any good news, so that negative narrative is now defining the market leading to a “sell first, ask questions later” approach.
Friday’s jobs report showed there were 428k new hires last month versus the anticipated 375k. This suggests that the domestic economy is still undergoing steady growth but also indicates that, with more people working, consumers are continuing to spend – driving demand above present supply levels and contributing to inflationary pressures that need to be addressed by even higher interest rates.
The unemployment rate held steady at 3.6% and the number of unemployed was unchanged at roughly 5.9 million. At this pace, unemployment will be below pre-pandemic levels by July.
Even if a company has great ideas, fantastic products, kick-ass software, creative and charismatic management, solves serious problems with its widgets and life-changing innovation, absolutely no-one cares right now. These kind of fundamentals don’t mean st at the moment and investing in individual stocks as if they do is going to make you very poor, very fast. Josh Brown mockingly called it “fundamental happy-talk” this week and (as usual) he’s 100% right, that’s exactly what it is.
Stop betting on one horse because you think you have some kind of an edge (you don’t!) and buy the whole damn field. Remember that every current market decline feels like a catastrophe, every prospective future decline looks like a big scary risk yet every past decline always looks like a huge missed opportunity.
Take your time, there’s no hurry any more. 2020’s FOMO is long dead. For longer term investments, quietly (or even not so quietly) start plotting to load up on broad index or sensible factor-based ETFs (go easy on buying the no-profit tech garbage). One day, your future self will thank you for it.
Other News:
2 job openings per unemployed worker .. The latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS)showed US job openings rose to an all-time high of 11.5 million in March, exceeding the number of unemployed workers by far more than 5.6 million, the widest gap ever recorded. There used to always be more unemployed Americans than jobs available in every month until early 2018 when things flipped to more jobs being available than unemployed workers to fill them. COVID and lockdown and its creation of millions more unemployed workers reversed the trend back, but in May 2021, it flipped back again and has not looked back since.
And not only are firms finding it difficult to fill positions but are also struggling to retain existing employees. Figures released last week also show that an unprecedented number of workers quit their jobs in March.
Bond carnage .. Zero coupon bonds are down 40% in 2022, long-term Treasury bonds have lost almost 20%, that’s a steeper decline than the S&P 500 so far this year. This surpasses the previous record for Treasury bonds, a loss of 17% in the twelve months ending in March 1980. The broad bond market has performed worse so far in 2022 than in any complete year since 1792 except one. That was back when Frederic Chopin completed Ballade No. 4 In F Minor in 1842, as a deep depression was bottoming out.
Bonds were supposed to be the safe haven part of your portfolio to offset that crazy stock market volatility, remember? It’s worth keeping in mind why you own bonds at all (unless you are like 30 years old or younger and saving for retirement in which case you shouldn’t own any bonds whatsoever). Bonds were never meant to make you rich, they are meant to stop you from becoming poor while paying you some sort of income along the way. And they will likely resume that role again one day. There’s just no way to know when.
Under The Hood:
Over the course of the last week or two there has been a rapid re-expansion in Supply and a simultaneous and equivalent contraction in Demand. If the market were nearing the end of its decline, this trend would typically be slowing, not accelerating. Only 15% of stocks are above their 30 day moving averages, a number from which it has historically been essentially impossible to generate a meaningful immediate rebound - the equivalent of a car running on gas fumes that needs to get somewhere 250 miles away.
If a bottom were forming you’d expect the most beaten-down Small Cap stocks to be, at the very least, stabilizing since this is where any recovery will eventually begin. Instead, the number of Small Cap stocks 20% or more below their highs (i.e. in what is generally accepted to be in a bear market) actually rose even as the indexes popped higher at times last week and now sits at a new recent-high above 60%.
Another cause for concern is that, even following the carnage of Thursday’s market incineration (and Friday’s non-rebound), stocks are not yet at over-sold levels from which to fashion a solid bounce. For instance, “over-sold” for the closely-followed stat of the percent of all stocks above their 30-week moving average is considered to be when it falls below 15%. At the close of business after Thursday’s bloodshed, it stood at 45%.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
We're past the peak of first-quarter earnings season, but there are still several notable companies left to report next week including Disney, Toyota, Simon Property, Occidental Petroleum, Norwegian Cruise Lines, BioNTech, Palantir, Rivian Automotive, Tyson Foods and Electronic Arts.
The economic calendar is headlined by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) index of retail inflation for April (see FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK below). The headline CPI is expected to increase 0.2% month over month, following a 1.2% increase in March. That would bring the year-over-year rate of headline inflation down to 8.1% (from 8.5%). Core CPI is expected to increase 0.4% month over month, following a 0.3% increase in March. That would bring the year-over-year rate of core inflation down to 6.1% (from 6.5%).
The Producer Price Index (PPI) measure of wholesale inflation comes out next week as well.
Among other data out next week will be the University of Michigan's consumer sentiment index for May.
====
INVESTOR SENTIMENT LAST WEEK (outlook for the upcoming 6 months):
Bullish ↑ 27% (16% the previous week)
Neutral → 20% (25% the previous week)
Bearish ↓ 53% (59% the previous week)
Net Bull/Bear spread .. Bearish ↓ by 26 (Bearish ↓ by 43 the previous week)
Long term averages: Bullish: 38% — Neutral: 32% — Bearish: 30% — Bull-Bear spread: Bullish by 8
All numbers rounded. Source: American Association of Individual Investors (AAII)
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s best performing US sector: Energy (two biggest holdings: Exxon Mobil, Chevron) - up 10.3%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Real Estate (two biggest holdings: American Tower, Prologis) - down 4.5%
Once again, the NASDAQ-100 underperformed the S&P 500
Emerging Markets and International Developed Markets both had a horrible week with US Markets a little less horrible
Not a lot in it, but Large Caps lost a bit less than Small and Mid
Value actually finished the week slightly higher (helped by its high energy component) but Growth was significantly lower
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power rose by 3 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure fell by 1 point
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is currently below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 39. SPY ended the week 13.9% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022)
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is currently below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 38. QQQ ended the week 23.5% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021)
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical short term rebound and above 70 are considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical short term decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Each week I'll link to an interesting article I have come across recently.
This week: A mesmerizing representation of the US stock market in 2022.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX (CPI)
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a measure that examines the weighted average of prices of a basket of consumer goods and services, such as transportation, food, and medical care. It is calculated by taking price changes for each item in the predetermined basket of goods and averaging them. Changes in the CPI are used to assess price changes associated with the cost of living.
The CPI is one of the most frequently used measures of inflation and deflation. It may be compared with the producer price index (PPI), which instead of considering prices paid by consumers looks at what businesses pay for inputs.
Inflation is the decline of a given currency's purchasing power over time; or, alternatively, a general rise in prices. A quantitative estimate of the rate at which the decline in purchasing power occurs can be reflected in the increase of an average price level of a basket of selected goods and services in an economy over some period of time. The rise in the general level of prices, often expressed as a percentage, means that a unit of currency effectively buys less than it did in prior periods.
The CPI is what is used to measure these average changes in prices that consumers pay for goods and services over time. Essentially, the index attempts to quantify the aggregate price level in an economy and thus measure the purchasing power of a country's unit of currency. The weighted average of the prices of goods and services that approximates an individual's consumption patterns is used to calculate CPI.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports the CPI on a monthly basis and has calculated it as far back as 1913. It is based upon the index average for the period from 1982 through 1984 (inclusive), which was set to 100.2 So a CPI reading of 100 means that inflation is back to the level that it was in 1984, while readings of 175 and 225 would indicate a rise in the inflation level of 75% and 125% respectively. The quoted inflation rate is actually the change in the index from the prior period, whether it is monthly, quarterly, or yearly.
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific time and is always subject to change. No warranty of its accuracy is given. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events, nor does it constitute a guarantee of any future results. The material is insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice. The user assumes the entire risk of any actions taken based on the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors has reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, Anglia Advisors has no control over, and is not responsible for, the accuracy of this content nor the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By accessing such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, the risk of going to these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
“We’re in a world-wide tightening cycle now, and so we have to let the air out of many of these assets” said a senior market analyst last week and it handily sums up what is going on across all markets at the moment.
The last time the stock market began a year this badly, World War II hadn’t even started yet. Bonds haven’t begun a year this badly since Madonna was in Vogue in 1990.
This toxic combination has meant that lower stock/higher bond portfolios, specifically designed to protect against stock market declines, are suffering as much as their all-stock cousins as the price of bonds is also simultaneously being driven lower by rising interest rates, completely nullifying their traditional role as a stable counterweight to falling stocks. Indeed, bonds are just as responsible as stocks for the fall in portfolio values so far in 2022. I’ll have more to say on this later in this week’s report (spoiler: there’s a silver lining), but this is something that diversified investors haven’t had to deal with in our lifetimes.
Geopolitically, it was not a good week either. Two months into the invasion, Putin largely eliminated a diplomatic solution to the Ukraine conflict meaning that it is likely to rage on for months to come, which is another headwind on growth and also an upward influence on inflation, a double negative for markets right now. It also increases the likelihood of a broad European recession. Also, European energy companies folding to Kremlin demands and agreeing to pay for natural gas shipments in rubles rather than dollars or Euros risks prolonging the war as it funds Russia’s aggression and potentially breaks sanctions.
China is doubling down on its “Zero COVID” policy, whereby it shuts down huge cities and essentially causes economic “brown outs” in an attempt to stop the spread of the disease. And since that’s a futile strategy that won’t work, markets are becoming increasingly concerned that the longer the Chinese keep trying, the more delayed a return to normal supply chain conditions will become (which will keep inflation pressure elevated). And if the Chinese economy plunges into recession, well that’s bad news bears for everyone.
The news required to alleviate these conditions is essentially threefold .. 1) China reverses its “Zero COVID” policy or COVID subsides massively so there are no more lockdown threats, 2) Russia and Ukraine declare a ceasefire or truce, 3) the Fed backs off its recent hawkish rhetoric. Unfortunately, none of these seem very likely near term, and until at least a couple of them come to pass, it’ll be tough for stocks to mount a real, sustainable rally.
Apple, Amazon, Microsoft and Intel all failed to impress investors with their earnings and/or guidance last week, with Amazon particularly harshly punished. They join a distinguished list of big tech firms (notably, Meta-Facebook, Alphabet-Google, Netflix etc.) who have been recently unable to paint a rosy picture about their near-to-medium-term outlooks.
The first estimate of GDP for Q1 2022 came in worse than expected but investors found reasons to not be too worried as the breakdown of the numbers showed that much of the shortfall from expectations stems from short-term issues rather than institutionally engrained problems. And anyhow, this first estimate is going to get revised to within an inch of its life over and over again in the coming months.
On the interest rate front, markets have now priced in three consecutive hikes of half a percentage point at each of the next three Fed meetings, starting this week. But higher rates are ultimately a good thing for holders of bond ETFs because they now earn higher yields on the fixed income portion of their investments.
One year treasury bonds are now yielding 2.0%. The two-year has a yield of 2.6%. Ok, these are not “stick-it-to-your-boss-and-retire-to-your-own-private-island” kind of returns, but they are a lot better than the lows of, respectively, 0.04% and 0.09%, that these bonds were paying not long ago. Anyone bailing out of bond funds now is locking in losses caused by the recent plunge and passing up on the improved income now being paid out by funds holding now-higher-paying bonds.
Your time horizon is everything. Anglia Advisors clients probably know that I don’t shut up about time horizons and various “buckets” for various time-frames. If the time horizon for your investment has shrunk to a matter of, say, eighteen months or less, then it should probably not be in the stock or bond markets at all.
“High Yield” Savings accounts at Marcus, Betterment, Ally, and others are very slightly and very slowly starting to raise their interest rates and offer zero exposure to the stock market and federal insurance. Great for peace of mind, but what they do, however, is grow your money by a fixed 0.50% or 0.60% per year in an 8.50% per year inflation environment. The grass is not always greener ..
Significant market declines have historically always eventually rewarded the hands-off investor with at least a ten year horizon that makes no changes other than maybe actually leaning into the decline and temporarily accelerating their rate of regular systematic periodic purchases of broad or factor-based ETFs. Very few people who have done this during past declines have ever regretted it in the long term.
But our reptilian brains tell us that the right thing to do is to get out and hide under a rock for shelter until the all-clear sounds. The problem with this strategy is that there is no all-clear that sounds to tell you that the skies have cleared. Also most humans (including most professional money managers) cannot get market timing right even once, but for this strategy to work, you have to make two perfect calls. When to get out and then when to get back in. And you’d better have a plan in place for the second before you carry out the first (see this week’s ARTICLE OF THE WEEK below).
Other News:
Follow the money flows? .. Fund investors sold $23.7 billion of US equity (stock) products over the week ending April 20th. That came after cash-ins totaling $15.9 billion in the prior week. This is a notable change from February and March 2022 which saw monthly inflows of $39.6 billion and $41.5 billion respectively.
The fixed income (bond) picture unusually shows a similar pattern, with $9.0 billion of outflows from these fund types during that same week. About the best one can say is that at least it was less-bad than the prior week ($16.4 billion of outflows) and the prior 4-week average of $10.3 billion in outflows.
If dollars are pouring out of both stock funds and bond funds, where are they going? The answer: to a small extent, to commodities and alternative investments like real estate, private equity, art, crypto, I Bonds etc, but mostly to the product that is currently 100% guaranteed to lose money over time, returning a maximum of 0.60% per year at best when inflation is diminishing its value by 8.5% a year: Cash.
Darwinism in stocks .. In a recent post, author and blogger Nick Magiulli cited writer Geoffrey West who stated:
Of the 28,853 companies that traded on U.S. markets since 1950, 22,469 (78 percent) had died by 2009. Of these 45 percent were acquired by or merged with other companies, while only about 9 percent went bankrupt or were liquidated; 3 percent privatized, 0.5 percent underwent leveraged buyouts, 0.5 percent went through reverse acquisitions, and the remainder disappeared for “other reasons.”
West’s research shows that public companies in the U.S. are in a constant state of self-reinvention. Based on his analysis, roughly half of all public U.S. companies in existence today won’t be in existence a decade from now. They will either merge, be acquired, go bankrupt, or find some other way out of the market. Because of this, what we call “the market” changes from year to year. Indeed, this rate of change might actually be accelerating. In 1965 the average company tenure in the S&P 500 was 33 years, but today it’s closer to 20 years.
Why is this important? Because it illustrates why buying an individual stock after a big fall is sooooo much riskier than buying an index fund or broad ETF after a similar plunge. While indexes constantly reconstitute themselves with fresh stocks and are fairly certain to eventually recover from the decline, there is absolutely no such confidence that an individual stock will. Indeed, history tells us that it’s pretty likely to simply disappear somehow.
This is worth bearing in mind as the market once again punishes those who have been averaging down by buying the many dips in the no-profit tech stocks that worked so well in 2020 for over a year now in the hope (and that’s really all it is, hope) that they will eventually recover. There’s a very meaningful chance many of them never will.
Bye-bye meme? .. There were two distinct periods of high retail investor interest in stocks over the last three years. The first was at the time of the March 2020 market incineration due to the emergence of COVID in the west, and the second was during the perfect storm of the last round of stimulus checks, bored Gen Z’ers in lockdown and the market correction in January 2021 which led to the whole meme stock, “Roaring Kitty” debacle. The level of US Google search volumes for the terms “buy stocks” and “invest” (the two most common phrases that correlate with imminent incremental retail investor activity) has now fallen to below 2019 levels, indicating that there are now other shiny new objects rather than stocks hogging the attention of these former keyboard warriors.
Under The Hood:
We’re finishing the calendar month with the S&P 500 index of large cap stocks below its 200-day moving average for the first time in over two years. What’s the significance of a clear downtrend for the S&P 500 and a monthly finish below this level? Well, higher volatility – in both directions – is going to become the new normal for a while now. If you take the 50 best and worst one-day returns for the S&P 500 in stock market history – 47 of them have happened while the S&P 500 was below its 200-day average.
As Josh Brown put it last week; “This is where the drama takes place”.
At the same time, small caps, the most sensitive market cap segment, continue to lead to the downside, suggesting a continuation of deterioration in the other market cap segments. It is difficult to see a light at the end of the tunnel when the legions of damaged stocks, now being joined by large caps including tech giants, keeps growing.
Anglia Advisors clients are welcome to reach out to me to discuss market conditions further.
The upcoming week’s calendar ..
More than 150 S&P 500 companies are scheduled to report their results for Q1 2022 this week, including Moderna, Starbucks, Etsy, CVS, EBay, Uber, Pfizer, BP, Biogen, Airbnb, Conoco Phillips, Royal Caribbean, Clorox, Devon Energy, Under Armour, Shell, Expedia, AMD, DuPont, Marathon Petroleum, Paramount and Cigna.
But all that is overshadowed by the Main Event; the Federal Open Market Committee concludes its May two-day meeting on Wednesday, when it will announce its long-awaited latest monetary policy decision. Market pricing overwhelmingly implies expectations of an interest rate increase of half a percentage point, to a Fed Funds target range of 0.75% to 1.0%.
It’s a double-barreled big econo-stat week with the April jobs report coming just two days after the Fed’s interest rate announcement. The average forecast is for a gain of 375k non-farm payrolls, compared with an increase of 431k in March.
And all this data is being piled on top of a market that feels very sensitive to any disappointing news right now, but might also be short-term oversold. Buckle up!
====
THE WEEK:
Relatively speaking ..
- Last week’s best performing US sector: Materials (two biggest holdings: Linde, Sherwin-Williams) - down 0.8%
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Discretionary (two biggest holdings: Amazon, Tesla) - down 7.4%
The NASDAQ-100 once again underperformed the S&P 500
Emerging Markets fell the least, followed by International Developed Markets with US Markets bringing up the rear
Mid Caps performed least badly, ahead of Large and Small
Not much between the respective performances of Growth and Value last week
Technical corner ..
The proprietary Lowry's measure for US Market Buying Power fell by 12 points last week while that of US Market Selling Pressure rose by 13 points
SPY, the S&P 500 ETF is below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and is also below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 35. SPY ended the week 13.8% below its all-time high** (01/03/2022)
QQQ, the NASDAQ-100 ETF, is below both its 50-day moving average and its 90-day and remains below its long term trend line. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading is 36. QQQ ended the week 22.5% below its all-time high** (11/19/2021)
* RSI readings range from 0-100. Readings below 30 indicate an over-sold condition, possibly primed for a technical short term rebound and above 70 are considered over-bought, possibly primed for a technical short term decline.*
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK:
Each week I'll link to an interesting article I have come across recently.
This week: “In investing, we don’t get to operate backward, we must invest forwards. Without the benefit of knowing what already happened. We do not know what random geopolitical events will occur, what shifts will take place in sentiment and how revenues and margins and profits will change. ALL WE HAVE IS PROCESS. If you do not have a defendable process, you are just spit-balling, speculating, guessing, dart-throwing.”
Barry Ritholtz’s brilliant, stinging and accurate profile of noisy, arrogant investment firms and hedge funds. The list at the end says it all. They can’t answer.
FINANCIAL TERM OF THE WEEK:
A weekly feature using information found on Investopedia (may be edited at times for clarity).
CAPITAL GAINS TAX
The capital gains tax is the levy on the profit from an investment that is incurred when the investment is sold. The levy can come from both Federal and State taxing authorities.
An investor accrues a capital gain whenever an investment is sold at a profit, after appreciating in value. Conversely, when an investor loses money on an investment and sells at a loss, a capital loss occurs. As an investor, it’s important to know which investments are subject to capital gains taxes, the different rates charged based on your tax bracket and filing status, and the ability to distinguish between various types of capital gains. Also note that unrealized capital gains, which accrue when an investment is not yet sold — and the profits not yet realized — are not subject to the capital gains tax. Capital gains taxes take effect once an investment has been sold, and can be sub-classified into short-term or long-term capital gains depending upon the duration of the investment.
Under current U.S. federal tax policy, the capital gains tax rate applies only to profits from the sale of assets held for more than a year, referred to as long-term capital gains. The current rates are 0%, 15%, or 20%, depending on the taxpayer's tax bracket for that year.
Short-term capital gains tax applies to assets that are sold one year or less from the date they were purchased. This profit is taxed as ordinary income. For almost all taxpayers, that is going to be a higher tax rate than the capital gains rate as most taxpayers pay a higher rate on their income than on any long-term capital gains they may have realized. That gives them a financial incentive to hold investments for at least a year, after which the tax on any profit will likely be lower.
Day traders and others taking advantage of the ease and speed of trading online need to be aware that any profits they make from buying and selling assets held less than a year are not just taxed—they are taxed at a higher rate than assets that are held long-term.
Taxable capital gains for the year can be reduced by the total capital losses incurred in that year. In other words, your tax is due on the net capital gain. There is a $3,000 maximum per year on reported net losses, but leftover losses can be carried forward to the following tax years.
If you have a high income, you may be subject to another federal levy, the net investment income tax. This tax imposes an additional 3.8% of taxation on your investment income, including your capital gains, if your modified adjusted gross income or MAGI (not your taxable income) exceeds the following (2022):
$200,000 if you’re single or a head of household
$250,000 if married filing jointly or a surviving spouse
$125,000 if married filing separately
+1 (646) 713-2225 | ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents an opinionated assessment of the market environment based on assumptions at a specific time and is always subject to change. It is not intended to act as a forecast of future events or a guarantee of any future results. The material is insufficient to be uniquely relied upon as research or investment advice. The user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors post or other communication.
Posts may contain links to third party websites for the convenience and interest of our readers. While Anglia Advisors has reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, Anglia Advisors has no control over, and is not responsible for, the accuracy of this content nor the security or privacy protocols the sites may or may not employ. By accessing such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, the risk of going to these sites and making any use of the information provided therein.
Clients of Anglia Advisors may maintain positions in securities and asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone or encourage them to subscribe themselves?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 04/24/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 04/17/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 04/10/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 04/03/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 03/27/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 03/20/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 03/13/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 03/06/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 02/27/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
02/20/2022 My weekly market review
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
02/13/2022 My weekly market review
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 02/06/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 01/30/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 01/23/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 01/16/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 01/09/2021
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 01/02/2022
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 12/19/2021
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 12/12/2021
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 12/05/2021
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 11/28/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 11/21/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 11/14/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 11/7/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 10/31/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 10/24/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 10/17/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 10/10/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 10/3/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 9/26/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 9/19/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 9/12/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 9/5/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 8/29/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 8/22/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
My weekly market review 8/15/21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Listen now | As part of Shock Your Potential's Money matters series, I discussed all things financial planning with Anglia Advisors
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Listen now (65 min) | I talk all things personal finance with Jaret and Gary, the rockstar dads (my interview starts at 26:30).
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Listen now (32 min) | Shawn Yesner, host of the Crushing Debt podcast, quizzed me on how a fee-only CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ can help younger people navigate the multitude of life events that are thrown at them between college graduation and their early 40s.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Listen now (28 min) | Allan Rollnick, the Tax Resolution Ninja, talks to me about the way I would approach different personal finance scenarios when working with clients under the age of 40.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Listen now (26 min) | Jennifer Hurvitz talks to me on her popular Doing Divorce Right podcast about handling your personal finances in that turbulent time immediately following the issue of a divorce decree and avoiding that feeling of being overwhelmed by all the moving parts that inevitably arise.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Listen now (44 min) | On the popular Divorce Team Radio podcast, I was interviewed about the particular personal finance challenges faced by individuals coming out of a divorce and how working with a specialized, fiduciary advisor can make such an enormous difference.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonbrady.substack.com
Alex Mahgoub is a real estate broker in New York City and, in this episode, he shares with us what both prospective buyers and sellers need to be thinking about in the current environment, how the process works, where's "hot" and why, what mistakes consistently sabotage a sale or a purchase and much more including how the participant mentality can mirror that of the stock market.
A "must-listen" if you are thinking about joining the circus known as the New York real estate market!
http://www.alexmahgoub.com/
https://www.instagram.com/alexmahgoub/
https://medium.com/personal-growth/the-endowment-effect-why-you-cant-let-go-of-your-possessions-a6be94eea10e
A bonus episode, featuring the audio of Simon's appearance on Asset TV in 2017 in which he discusses with Maya Chung what financial advisors need to know and understand when dealing with foreign national clients. It ends up being a good summary of many of the important financial planning issues that need to be considered by foreign nationals moving to the US.
Unfortunately the video clip is no longer available.
My conversation with Asema Bek of Bloccelerate VC covers basic questions about crypto assets and the blockchain. Why the hype? What are they? How do they play together? What are the challenges? What does a blockchain-driven future look like?
This episode is for anyone who has been searching for a jargon-free introduction to the world of crypto and the blockchain.
Resources (provided by Asema):
https://blockchainhub.net/blockchain-intro/ https://www.coindesk.com/information/how-does-blockchain-technology-work/ https://medium.com/the-future-of-blockchain-technology-top-five/the-future-of-blockchain-technology-top-five-predictions-for-2030-67df1d7c2391
http://www.bloccelerate.vc/
"Most of the world of credit doesn't make sense" .. so says Anthony Davenport, founder of Regal Credit Management during a wide-ranging discussion with Simon about the sometimes crazy world of credit, credit agencies and credit scores. What exactly is taken into consideration in the makeup of your credit score? It's probably not what you think. What are the biggest mistakes consumers make with their credit? What do you face and what can you do if you are a foreign national who has just arrived here and has no credit history? Filled with surprising credit anecdotes and real, actionable tips and advice, this episode will help all of us better understand and manage our credit
--- Regal Credit Management: https://regalcredit.com/
--- "Your Score" by Anthony Davenport: https://anthonymdavenport.com/
--- Coming To America: https://regalcredit.com/financial-issues-for-foreign-nationals-working-in-u-s-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2/
Simon returns the favor from episode 8 and has another conversation with Jamie Lee, negotiation consultant, this time learning from her why it is that so many of us have such a block when it comes to negotiating pay raises and promotions with employers and what mindset we should adopt and what we can practically do to obtain the outcomes we want. Spoiler; the words "research, research, research!" come up.
www.jamieleecoach.com/
https://anchor.fm/jamie-lee0
In this bonus episode, Simon is interviewed by Jamie Lee, negotiation consultant and host of the "Born To Thrive" podcast, on "Financial Truisms" including why women can be better investors than men (and why they need to be!) and how this can impact partnerships and marriages, just what is estate planning and why it is not all about money and taxes, and getting retirement planning right.
http://www.jamieleecoach.com/
https://anchor.fm/jamie-lee0
There are millions of Americans managing over $1,400,000,000,000 in outstanding student loan debt principal in the US today (although, as we learn in the podcast, it's actually worse than that) and the vast majority of them are repaying their loans in the wrong way. Bobby Matson, founder and CEO of Payitoff, joins me to talk about how, with the use of advanced algorithms and technology, our clients can now learn the most optimal and efficient way to pay down their loans, map out refinancing scenarios where appropriate and get into good investing habits along the way - potentially knocking years off their repayment periods and saving thousands in interest payments.
https://www.angliaadvisors.com/student-loan-repayment-plan/
https://www.payitoff.io/
https://www.payitoff.io/advisors/beta
Shannon McNulty, CFP® is an estate planning attorney and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™professional with a specialty in the multitude of sometimes mind-boggling and daunting issues that particularly affect foreign nationals in the field of estate planning, particularly those recently arrived and who may not be long term residents. Who is most affected? What are some of the truly catastrophic consequences of not fully understanding the rules? What, if anything can be done to prepare for these consequences?
If you are moving, or have recently moved, to the United States, you need to do yourself a favor and listen to this podcast.
www.mcnulty-law.com
http://www.investopedia.com/advisor-network/articles/111616/financial-issues-foreign-nationals-working-us/
** the podcast references an estate tax exemption of about $5.5m for US domiciles and $60k for non-domiciles, this has subsequently changed to $11.2m for US domiciles but is still $60k for non domiciles.
Laura Cowan, estate planning attorney in New York City, and I discuss who needs wills, living wills and health care proxies (spoiler alert: pretty much everyone needs one or more of these!), what to consider when selecting guardians for children, making preparations for an unforeseen health crisis and what happens to all those user names, passwords and logins when you die. Laura explains the process of getting documents together, but more importantly, brings up issues you may not have thought of but definitely need to consider, regardless of your age or level of wealth.
http://www.angliaadvisors.com/blog/clients-estate-planning
http://lauraecowanlaw.com/
http://lauraecowanlaw.com/events/
My true feelings about the life insurance industry are spotted in this episode with Ross Karp, independent life/disabilty insurance broker and founder of 3P Insurance. We also talk business networking in NYC and how to make it actually work.
http://finsecurity.com/rkarp
http://networkmng.com/
In another opinionated companion podcast to a published Business Insider article, I talk about how waiting before you start an investment plan can cost you heavily (single millennials, I'm particularly looking at you!) and I break down exactly and quantify how much of an advantage can be gained by starting right now and how damaging it can be to procrastinate.
http://www.businessinsider.com/financial-adviser-procrastination-is-the-worst-thing-for-your-wealth-2017-5
In a companion podcast to an Investopedia article from late 2016 that I wrote, I discuss the irrefutable data that shows why picking individual stocks in which to invest is a vastly inferior and riskier strategy than using index funds and ETFs.
Somehow this managed to simultaneously piss off clueless millennial day-traders and grey-haired, dinosaur, old-school, stock-picking financial advisors. Nice!
http://www.investopedia.com/advisor-network/articles/082616/why-stock-picking-losers-game/
"The Behavior of Individual Investors", Brad M. Barber and Terrance Odean: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1872211
"Eye On The Market (Special Edition)", September 2014, JP Morgan Chase & Co.: https://www.jpmorgan.com/cm/BlobServer/Eye_on_the_Market_September_2014_-_Executive_Summary.pdf
A bonus episode - my podcast debut. Back in March 2016, in the opening weeks of the life of the firm, I was invited onto the Potentially Human podcast by Alexandra Janelli and Aubrey Levitt to discuss the origins of Anglia Advisors, its core principles and what the company would look like if it was a person!
www.potentiallyhuman.co