The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast: Recent Episodes
The People's Countryside
This podcast's for anyone wanting to explore the big issues, stretching your thinking in relatable ways. Well known personalities, Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and photographer William Mankelow, who aren't experts, but have opinions, authentic views and no scripts.
Join them on meandering conversations about nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Sometimes joined by guests, or discussing listener questions between themselves. Always full of fun anecdotes and a bit of silliness.
https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Today’s episode marks a special moment as we welcome back Alex Kauffmann to the Listeners Chair for one final time before he returns to university. Before signing off, he expressed his gratitude for being part of the podcast and acknowledged that it may be a few months before he returns.
This episode also highlights an important aspect of podcasting: listener interaction. Each episode features two questions submitted by our audience. These questions vary in frequency—some listeners become regular contributors, while others send in a single question and are never heard from again. This dynamic creates a rich tapestry of engagement, showcasing the diverse interests and curiosity of our audience.
Sally, from Mildura, Australia sets the first question for us today - “I feel where social media has gone wrong, is we use it as a backdrop to our lives, giving others the perception that our lives have meaning. For example, people are incessantly posting about their holidays, and their food. The posts don’t add value to the observer, they just seem designed to impress others how well travelled and cultured we are, and giving others an insight into our digestive process. I’m not sure where it went wrong, but the value is in living and not living to prove the value of our life through social media.”
Social media often promotes curated highlights over authentic experiences. William advocates purposeful posting to inspire or inform, while Alex critiques its superficiality, viewing it as attention-seeking and disconnected from real life.
Stuart uses social media strategically to communicate impact, urging reflection over validation. Both Alex and Stuart call for mindful engagement—living in the moment and posting with clear intent, especially in environmental contexts.
Aine, Dublin, Republic of Ireland - “Man is having as big an impact if not a bigger one as the meteor that killed the non-avian dinosaurs. Can we fathom the size of that problem?”
Stuart highlights Aine’s insight that only non-avian dinosaurs went extinct. Alex views humanity’s resilience as part of ongoing evolution, suggesting extinction is less probable than other natural threats.
The group explores the limits of human perception, noting difficulty in grasping large-scale issues like climate change or asteroid impacts. William questions whether full comprehension is necessary, proposing local awareness as a practical alternative.
Stuart further challenges temporal understanding, suggesting time may be a human construct without fixed boundaries.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
It’s our 600th episode! I know what you’re thinking, they don’t sound jaded and tired, which could easily be the case, after so many episodes. That’s because with every episode, the tone is set by you dear listeners, who continue to send in questions for us to discuss. We've only got nine questions lined up at present, so get 'em in now and you'll be answered quite quickly, maybe even in time for Christmas, wouldn’t that be the best present you’ve ever received!?
Alex Kauffmann is back in the listener's chair for his penultimate episode before he buggers off back to college. Has he been with us too long, or not long enough maybe? Only you can decide.
Today’s first question comes from Estefania, Jalisco, Mexico - “We’re told the new green economy will save us, yet that's still utilising the same system that's destroying us. Green tech, if done well and for the right reasons is the right thing to do, but what we’re not told is there's one thing we can all do, that has a positive impact on all areas of climate change, that much green tech doesn't. Eat less meat and dairy”
William jumps straight in: he says that one of the biggest contributors to climate change is meat, specifically beef. So if you could eat less meat, and particularly beef, it would have a better impact, he thinks, than any new technology.
Alex explains that while challenges are inevitable, Green Tech is not destined to replicate unsustainable systems. He envisions it developing into an ecosystem, that connects with society, much like nature does, an aspiration that takes time but follows the pattern of past innovations.
Stuart recalls warning that investing in green inventions often meant funding big oil companies, which buy up patents, only to shelve them. He argues that these corporations suppress alternatives to maintain dependence on oil, later reintroducing the innovations as if they were entirely new.
And the second question for today’s charade comes from Vinroy, Linstead, Jamaica - It is a long question, and we only get 4,000 characters to play with, you can find Vinroy’s bumper of a question right here: Vinroy’s question
Alex notes that while some societies adapt to governmental and economic structures, extreme wealth concentration remains a persistent issue. He adds that cultural differences make universal solutions difficult to implement.
William highlights the organization Led by Donkeys, which exposes how the very wealthy can easily obtain foreign citizenship to offshore money and avoid taxes. He emphasizes that some people will always prioritize their own financial interests above all else. There are ways that people can actually get around it by going to organizations like this where they can actually offshore their money.
Stuart reflects that while the wealthy and the poor often operate on different value systems, true richness isn’t financial. He suggests that instead of chasing flashy wealth, society could adopt a different set of values that doesn’t revolve around material accumulation.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
This is the People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. Every episode we conversate around two listener questions, and where possible, spin the conversation around to the environment in some way, regardless of the topic covered.
In today’s episode we begin with an educational question from Unity in Paddock Wood, Kent, England - “What do you think about bringing climate change into the mainstream UK curriculum in schools? 10 years ago children's favourite word was minion, now it's climate change. Do we risk scaring children by catastrophizing? Is it better to teach older school children solutions and tools? Are we making the younger ones anxious? Do we risk promoting political activism if we educate about climate change in the wrong way? If we teach that we have no agency for change we risk just making children grow up angry, instead of driving actual change”.
Alex feels that the subject of climate change really would be best added to the subject of geography. He recalls being taught about earthquakes, pollution, and overpopulation, so there’s already catastrophising in schools. He recalls his time in secondary school, and concludes that climate change really should be there as a subject.
William brings this whole conversation around to whether this is once again an avoidance of our own mortality issue? That the subject of death around children can be an even more taboo subject than sex for example.
Stuart recalls a conversation with a teacher after listening to a past episode about climate change in the curriculum. And they were absolutely convinced that climate change had infiltrated every single lesson, but it was so subtle that nobody noticed it.
We then move onto this taxing question from Brice in Crieff, Scotland - “Should we be taxing on wealth and assets and not just income? The super rich are buying up everything and enslaving people to be in debt to them. Can we do anything until wealth is more fairly distributed, like after the second world war in the UK?”
Alex thinks that we should tax the rich which he feels everyone can agree with, but the way our societies are run, with corrupt governments, they're money hungry and therefore the rich live in the best conditions because of that. So there's not really much we can do. Who is going to tax the rich? The government, who are corrupt?
Stuart raises the point that he doesn’t necessarily think the super rich are intentionally enslaving us, but the by-product of process does.
William brings up the idea of a universal income, where everyone can afford the basics in their life, food, shelter etc. He goes onto say that he feels that is maybe idealistic, and that we humans are greedy buggers, and we don’t want anyone to have a slice of our pie.
Stuart comes up with an environmental action: We need to be more realistic with environmentalism and not think about utopian ideals. We need balance and measure.
William’s action with an environmental twist: He encourages you to get off that aspiration train, and that in itself will definitely have a positive impact on the environment.
Alex’s environmental action: We always talk about the tool and the master quite a lot. Money is a tool, not a master. It doesn't shape your life. It's what you use to live. It's not everything in life. So just think of it that way. It's a tool so use it as one.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: Petition Link
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends Podfollow Link , support our work through Patreon Patreon Link. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: Linktree Link
Alex is back in the listeners chair again today. You send in the questions, we tackle them live—always with an environmental twist and no peeking beforehand.
Jess, from Bishop’s Tatchbrook, Warwickshire, England sets the initial question - “I’ve been thinking about the police Stop and Search tactics in the UK. Should we keep it? Done for the right reasons, with truthful explanations, is it wrong? It's about how it's done I think, without aggression, reasonably and respectfully. Done well it lasts seconds, done badly it progresses and escalates”.
Alex hasn’t had much direct experience with stop and search but has heard mixed views.
William sees outcomes as shaped by the officer’s mindset, while Stuart argues stereotyping is inevitable—but misuse is harmful.
Stuart’s been stopped often and feels both sides share responsibility.
William stresses the need for solid reasoning, though Stuart defends instinct.
They discuss vague intel, lost police experience, and knowing your rights.
Stuart calls for balance; William urges activists to check their egos to avoid pointless conflict.
Vinroy, in Linstead, Jamaica sent us the next question - “Not been well recently so I have been thinking about some big issues. The world around us, including buildings and the sea, is it dominated by objects or processes?”
William sees our world as shaped by habitual processes—things built, then replaced.
Alex adds that automation plays a growing role.
Stuart argues nearly everything is a process, not an object: the sea, buildings, even plastic all undergo constant change and decay. He struggles to see anything as static. William agrees, linking deterioration to environmental forces.
Alex counters that objects exist as matter, while life itself is a process. The conversation dips into philosophy.
William’s action: don’t over define everything. Stuart’s: take time to reflect—or not. Alex’s: contemplate life’s full arc and step back from reality.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss?
Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Alex Kauffmann has resumed his role as principal moderator of ‘The Listeners Chair’, reclaiming the central chair from which audience questions are drawn. These are then picked apart and reframed within environmental contexts to tease out wider significance.
Lilly, from Summertown, Oxford, England sets the first question - “Should Oxford colleges open up more of their greenspaces to the wider population and tourists, or is it ok to keep them private and it is only the poor driving the move as they want some of what the rich have? Some people actually attending the college don’t even get to see some of the private internal areas. I heard it said opening up threatens students GDPR protection, and that students don’t really want to be disturbed. The Town and Gown rivalry still lives on, and the university often gets bad press. People often forget there are two universities in Oxford”.
Stuart, forever Lily’s “expert” after one fateful consultation, swears they’re basically besties—especially now she’s firing off another sly jab at the critic who dared to be dismissive back then.
He digresses into the “sleeve Olympics,” where longer gown fabric apparently equals status. Then, like a city tour guide, he sketches a divide between the postcard-perfect centre and “real Oxford,” the suburbs where life actually happens.
Alex, all cynicism, scoffs that locals couldn’t care less about polished lawns—they’re strictly tourist bait. William, sounding like the tourist board, notes that plenty of colleges open their gates—sometimes free for residents—though all the quads blur together: same stones, same chapels.
Back with Stuart, who moans these patches are so tiny you’d wreck your shoes circling them—and forget walking on grass.
Alex delivers his verdict: if dons don’t stroll freely, neither should tourists. William agrees students do deserve their hush-hush study sanctuaries, but insists that visitors tread as reverently as in a cathedral.
Luna, San Hose Del Cabo, Mexico brings the next question - “I see the biggest threats to humanity outside of the multiple climate related issues as truth distortion, feral social media and runaway AI. What do you think?”
Stuart resets by clarifying that “threats to humanity” means existential doom, not oat‑milk prices. He drops the wisdom of belly‑button gazing: stare too long and all you get is fluff, not enlightenment. Translation? Stop spiraling—take action, even if it’s just colour‑coding your apocalypse survival kit alphabetically.
Alex wonders whether “threats” means asteroids or endless propaganda. William connects social media, AI, and collapsing truth like red string on a board, warning not to trust any single source.
Alex, ever the optimist, claims independent news influencers are thriving, which he counts as hopeful. He advises we stop fretting constant climate doom, since total self‑destruction is unlikely. His news tip? “News Daddy,” a TikTok oracle free of corporate spin.
William closes with the mic‑drop: the gravest threat to humanity is “believing our own bullshit.” Hard to argue with that—now hand me the navel fluff.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org petition
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Ever wondered what happens when a housing ladder turns into a pyramid, a mortgage that outlives its owner, and funding applications start behaving like job adverts? Then this is the episode for you!
Welcome to The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast where you, the listener, send in questions for co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow to conversate around.
In today’s episode we once again welcome back Alex Kauffmann to ‘The Listener’s chair. Alex has been in the ‘Listener’s Chair’ so often that it already feels like home for him.
The first listener question for today’s episode comes from Grace in Ipswich, England and is as follows:
“We have pressures put upon us and by ourselves and others in the UK to get on the housing ladder. Is being on there really important, or is it more about people higher up the pyramid enslaving us to debt?”
From Grace’s question, Stuart highlights the difficulty of paying off mortgages, that it's hard to pay the mortgage off in your own lifetime with current wages. He stresses that housing should be about shelter, and questions whether progress on the housing ladder is real.
Alex shares his hope of becoming a homeowner, admits it’s harder than expected, and says he values a home that meets needs rather than something excessive.
William raises concerns about intergenerational mortgages, which Stuart brings as potentially being a thing in Japan. He goes on to distinguish between buying a house and climbing the housing ladder, and argues it’s not essential to be on the ladder.
The second listener question comes Lilly in Summertown, Oxford, England:
“Many say in the UK grant funders in the UK make it difficult for those seeking funding as they have different agendas and methodologies that applicants have to tap into. Yet if funders worked together, streamlined, it could iron out some of the duplication work. Funders could pool their efforts so people seeking funding have less hoops to jump through. I see to that funders want applicants to justify their impact, whereas refocusing on asking applicants what they need, to be even more impactful, could be more beneficial. Yet other people say applicants should just accept its hard work getting funding and funders are in actual fact already communicating to iron things out. Are we too willing to accept these days?”
From Lily’s question William notes the challenges of grant funding, describes the application process as a filter, and warns that securing funding is just the start of the hard work.
Stuart, who recalls meeting Lily, the person who has set this question, at a consultation, reflects on the importance of genuine impact assessments, and insists funding is only as hard as people make it.
Alex says collaboration between funders is possible, though he admits has little experience in this area, and encourages listeners to pursue their ideas without fear of failure.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
In this episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow are once again joined by Alex Kauffmann, in the ‘Listener’s chair,’ to explore two very different, but equally thought-provoking questions sent in by listeners.
Faye from Islington, London, England, asks the first question: “We often talk about societal addictions and highlight drugs and alcohol, but isn't addiction to salaries in there too?”
From Faye’s question, William argues that salary addiction is real, but often “unseen.” He links it to ancient hunter-gatherer instincts: we have always wanted more resources for survival, and that same drive now fuels the endless chase for wealth. Like billionaires who never stop wanting more, the craving for higher salaries rarely ends. Alex describes addiction as “a drug within the mind.” He argues salary addiction sits in the same category as drugs, alcohol, or gaming because all trigger brain chemicals that can become compulsive. Stuart highlights how salaries often act as status symbols. He recalls meeting people introduced by their salary amounts, saying this fuels social pressure and unhealthy comparison.
Mark from Horspath, Oxfordshire, England, brings us the second question in today’s episode, which is as follows: “People often say about the Rhodes statue on Oriel College in Oxford that they don’t like him looking down at us during the modern day. Others say we don’t have to look, and history is history after all. Any thoughts?”
Off the back of Mark's big question, Stuart argues that the problem isn’t statues themselves, but how they’re presented. Placed high on plinths without explanation, statues imply respect. He believes they should present both the good and the bad, not sanitize history. William observes that many people barely notice statues at all — like the Rhodes statue on Oriel, which blends into the architecture. He suggests adding plaques or context boards to show “the whole picture” rather than encouraging idolization. Meanwhile Alex sees that many statues function as little more than decoration unless people actually recognize who or what they represent. Without context, they risk being “just decoration.” He compares them to religious statues, which only have meaning because people recognize their stories.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Welcome to the podcast that’s not really about people, and definitely not about the countryside—unless you count emotional landscapes and the occasional sheep metaphor.
Since the Great Plague of Zoom Calls (aka COVID), you lot have been flinging questions at us like confetti at a wedding we weren’t invited to. We don’t read them beforehand—because where’s the fun in preparation? We hit record and hope for the best.
We’ve got 18 more questions queued up, which means we’re either wildly popular or someone’s cat walked across a keyboard and hit “send” repeatedly. Either way, if you want your question featured, now’s your moment.
And yes, somewhere buried beneath our rambling, sarcasm, and occasional existential dread, there’s probably a nugget of actionable wisdom. Like a motivational quote scribbled on a pub napkin.
Jess, from Bishop’s Tatchbrook, Warwickshire, England sets the first question - “How do different forms of love (platonic, romantic, familial) direct and orchestrate our lives individually and collectively?”
Love: the emotional Swiss Army knife. Stuart says it grounds you, energizes you, distracts you, levels you out, and occasionally hijacks your to-do list. William’s all in—love is life, especially if it involves hugging trees. Stuart’s less sentimental: family is great unless you’re stuck with them like mismatched socks, and friends might just be the upgrade. William assumes families love each other (adorable), but also warns that love can morph into grief-monsters and toxic clinginess. Sometimes, the most loving thing is to ghost your relatives. And finally, William wonders: do we love the planet, or are we just swiping right on nature for the aesthetic?
Luna, from San Jose Del Cabo, Mexico sets the next question - “ What do you think of your critics?”
Stuart’s approach to criticism? Less “What did they say?” and more “How dare they make me feel things?” He’s basically running a one-man emotional focus group. William, ever the sage, thinks critics can be useful—like unsolicited life coaches with better vocabulary. But he refuses to create with critics in mind, because nothing says artistic paralysis like trying to please everyone. Stuart suggests we interrogate our environmental beliefs (cue existential crisis), while William wraps it all up with a TED Talk to a bank: be authentic, not beige. Because nothing screams soul like ignoring your shareholders.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We're the kind of people who'd lick a glacier just to say we’ve “explored it cold.” No matter what we're talking about—be it cheese, space travel, or ancient plumbing—we’ll somehow loop it back to the environment. And yes, between two questions, we casually teleport 11,000 miles—from croissants in Paris to kiwis in the Bay of Plenty. Our carbon footprint is basically a world tour.
Margot, from Paris, France is the listener setting the first question today. “What is the significance of pilgrimage in different religions?”
Alex thinks pilgrimages are just fancy holidays with extra soul-searching. Stuart’s like, “Pilgrimage? Could be a museum binge or a walk to your nan’s—whatever moves you.” William treats Finland like his personal Zen dojo. Alex says you don’t even need to leave your sofa—just vibe deeply. Stuart reckons all pilgrimages, religious or not, are just brain space with a passport. William’s in it for the emotional detox. Environmentally? Alex hugs trees locally. Stuart reads the fine print before jumping on the eco-bandwagon. William wants pilgrimages with less carbon and more conscience.
Ryan, from Bay Of Plenty, New Zealand sets the next question. “Does the concept of fate or destiny play a role in the meaning of life and choices we make?”
Alex treats destiny like a cosmic suggestion box—no proof, but hey! Stuart’s into fate with a side of free will, like life’s a GPS with optional detours. William’s not buying it—he’s Team DIY Life Plan. Alex likes spreadsheets over spontaneity. Stuart says embracing life’s chaos is liberating, like nihilism but with better PR. William, after hearing the others, realizes he’s never properly Googled “destiny” and might give it a second thought. Eco twist? Alex says ponder fate while hugging a tree. Stuart suggests debating destiny to save the planet. William wants to slow-cook his existential crisis and see if it’s compostable.
The video link of the race William refers to which was when Australian Steven Bradbury won gold medal at the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUi4-H6hfw8
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Since COVID, this podcast has pretty much been all about the questions that you, the listener, have sent in for Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow, the two co-hosts, to conversate around.
In every episode, two of these listener questions are discussed, and by sheer coincidence, both questions in today’s episode, have come from the same person; Elodie in Brittany, France.
The first of Elodie’s questions is as follows: “What does the ideal form of government look like, and why?”
From this question the conversation begins with an exploration of what constitutes an ideal form of government. Stuart advocates for a system that is fair, progressive, and breaks free from traditional constraints, even referencing John Lydon's controversial support for Donald Trump, as an example of challenging the establishment. William counters with a stark reality check, arguing that Trump causes real harm to working people and asserting that no truly ideal government can exist, due to inherent human disagreement and dissent.
The discussion evolves into a fascinating examination of power dynamics, with William drawing unexpected parallels between government structures and the music industry's shift from record label dominance to streaming platform control. Both hosts ultimately agree that effective governance requires balance - strong leadership willing to make difficult decisions, paired with robust opposition ready to find middle ground through reconciliation.
The second question from Elodie is “How do names and labels influence our perceptions and reality?
William expresses discomfort with gendering non-human objects like hurricanes and ships, leading to a broader conversation about the difference between grammatical gender and sexual identity. Stuart provocatively argues that society's obsession with labeling - whether by profession, sexuality, or identity - may actually hinder progress, rather than advance it.
The hosts examine the LGBTQ+ movement through different lenses, with William viewing it as necessary activism against those who deny gender diversity, while Stuart questions whether continued focus on gender categories prevents true social evolution.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
We cover two listener questions in today’s episode, with two guests once again in the Listener’s Chair, those being Alex Kauffmann and Suzi Darrington, who sit alongside the regular co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow.
The two questions up for discussion are: “How do technological advancements alter scientific methodologies?” which was sent in by Floss in Gimli, Manitoba, Canada, and “Can ethical consumption ever exist in a capitalistic society?” which was posed by Paul in Queensland, Australia.
From Floss’s question, Alex feels that technology evolves to become more accurate and precise over time, forcing scientific methodologies to adapt accordingly. Suzi sees positive AI applications in science (early breast cancer detection for example) but is concerned about how it’s being used in the creative fields, while Stuart advocates for technology to enhance rather than replace human skills and awareness. William emphasizes viewing AI as a tool rather than a master, for example it can be useful for mentoring when human mentors aren't accessible. He feels it all comes down to how AI is used.
Then from Paul’s question, William attempts to define ethical consumption by encouraging you to "stop buying crap and just buy what you actually need to exist", while Suzi posits the idea that “ if consumption is ethical, it would have to be good, not just neutral. But she thinks when people criticize consumption under capitalism, the suggestion is that it's not only not ethically good, it's actually ethically bad because it relies on someone's exploitation.” Meanwhile Alex believes that pure ethical consumption under capitalism is impossible, and advocates to be conscious of your environmental impact in consumption decisions. Stuart questions whether anyone is truly outside the capitalist system - he asks "aren't we all in the system?"
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We don't necessarily talk about the countryside on this podcast as much as we used to or should do, maybe. You, the listeners, now send in questions for us to conversate around. We don't see the questions until we press record, and we always try to spin it back to the environment in some way.
In this episode we have two guests in the listener’s chair, the first guests in a long while, or should we say chairs? One returning guest, and one podcast newbie, those being Suzi Darrington, and Alex Kauffmann.
Jess, from Bishop’s Tatchbrook, Warwickshire, England asks the first question - “Can we trust our memories, or do they alter our perception of reality in the moment and over time?”
Stuart kicks off with two oldies, two newbies—this’ll be fun!. He suspects age might split opinions.
Suzi, the memory maestro, says perception’s shaped by memories but isn’t totally unreliable (even if your brain sometimes edits like a bad film director).
Stuart wonders if we can trust memories at all.
Alex chimes in: nostalgia is basically Photoshop for the past.
William notes childhood memories are fuzzy, recent ones clearer—but we all cherry-pick.
They all agree: memory messes with reality, but it’s still useful. Final takeaway? Use your warped recollections to fuel eco-action. Just don’t trust them to find your lost keys.
Unity, from Paddock Wood, Kent, England sets todays second question - “What role does genetics play in the debate between free will and determinism?”
Suzi wonders if we’re just meat robots running on genetic Wi-Fi.
Alex compares determinism to infinity—huge, mysterious, and not great dinner party material.
William shrugs: He acts like he has free will, even if he’s just a well-dressed algorithm.
Stuart brings up Zimbabwe’s hyperinflation to prove some things are just too bonkers to grasp.
Suzi asks: if we’re coded, can we still be blamed for binge-watching reality TV?
Tribalism and cognitive dissonance get a shoutout—because ignoring facts is basically a hobby.
Alex muses that evolution is slow genetic editing.
William says we’re built to adapt, even to climate chaos.
Final takeaway? Whether you’re free or pre-programmed, use your mysterious powers for good—especially for the planet.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
You could rewind the podcast, listen in reverse, and Stuart (co-host) would still sound like he's decoding alien transmissions. People keep saying we should be 'industry voices'—but the world has plenty of self-appointed sages peddling their predictable patter. We’d rather stay unpredictable than be another echo in the expert chamber.
Vinroy, from Linstead, Jamaica sets the first listener question today - “Would a multiverse be compatible with our current understanding of reality?”
William (your other co-host) ponders, what even is reality? Stuart shrugs and suggests reality’s just a dodgy software update away from collapsing. Cue William, citing His Dark Materials, where every time you pick tea over coffee, another universe spins off with deeply confused baristas. Stuart steers things into, if it feels good, it’s probably carbon neutral territory, while William counters, change hurts. Stuart argues life shouldn't feel like an eco bootcamp. William admits his internal habits committee is... inefficient. The multiverse? Tempting. But for now, this one’s tricky enough.
Scott, Arisaig, Scotland - “Can we ever claim to have absolute knowledge about anything? The human brain can’t conceive the notion of nothingness. Before the big bang, there was nothing. What did that look like? Can a human brain ever conceive of that.”
William isn’t buying Scott’s nothing before the Big Bang theory—he reckons there was probably something, even if it was just cosmic awkward silence. Stuart thinks time is just our brains trying to make calendars feel important. William drops in 14 billion years like it’s a fun fact; Stuart counters with do we really know why water’s wet? Before spiraling into Newtonian conspiracy. William argues for concrete truths—like sogginess—and Stuart, mid-meditation, wonders if truth is just our neurons doing improv. William challenges listeners to imagine nothing. Stuart wants the Dalai Lama’s take. William just wants anyone’s.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
If you’re listening to this podcast, you've officially run out of things to do with your life.
Now we’ve got your attention, here’s the first of two listener questions, your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt, whose known for his willingness to challenge mainstream perspectives, and William Mankelow who always tries to anchor the discussion with thoughtful reflections, that blend aesthetics with reality. But most of the time, they are both trying their best not to swear.
The first question then comes from Rithipol in Phnom Penh, Cambodia - “When you look back, those creatures considered most intelligent, dominated less intelligent species, and maybe even contributed to their demise and extinctions. Considering this against the upsurge in AI, if we are considering inventing something that could in some ways be more intelligent than ourselves, are we signing our own death warrant?”
From Rithipol’s inquiry, Stuart focuses on questioning fundamental assumptions about AI and intelligence. He challenges whether AI is truly "new" by drawing parallels to genetically modified crops, which had been around for decades before public awareness peaked. He questions the consistency of arguments about intelligence - if humans claim to be the only intelligent species, then other animals causing extinctions can't be attributed with intelligence, but if other species are intelligent, then humans aren't unique.
William takes a balanced perspective on AI as being a transformative but double-edged technology. He acknowledges that fear around AI stems from it being new and unknown, while recognizing its potential as one of the most important developments in human history that will inevitably be used for both good and bad purposes.
The second question is from Fred in St Just, Cornwall, England - “Stuart you say we should do one thing well before moving on to the next. That would be a good thing to do during the ongoing process of human evolution don’t you think? Or would it have held us back with hidden consequences? I’d add to your statement Stuart - we should be the best at the stuff that needs no talent, and build from there".
Here’s what Stuart made of this question that was directed at him.
Stuart believes in doing one thing well before moving to the next, viewing this as essential for avoiding the common mistake of spreading ourselves too thinly across multiple areas. However, he makes an important distinction between individual and collective action - while individuals should focus on mastering one thing at a time, as a species we need to pursue multiple endeavors simultaneously because this diversity drives evolution and progress.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
There is quite a bit to unpack in this, the latest episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. Where conversations serve as springboards for deeper discussions that weave through nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice, all with the starting point of a question sent in by a listener.
In today’s episode your co-hosts discuss two such questions, the first coming from Ray, Sauk Centre, Minnesota, USA - “The Biden and Trump administrations worked together as one came to an end and the other started. Should the two parties power share and work together as a better version of future US politics? 77 million voted for Trump and 75 million, I think, voted for Harris. The country is split so is it time to share?”.
Off the back of Ray’s question Stuart comes up with an action: if you went to kindergarten or you went to nursery school. When you think about how your life progressed in school and you ceased to share, and it was about self gain, self gratification, getting grades, and all the rest of it was just me, me, me, me, me .Think if the sharing had continued through your education, and on into your adult life, how would it have looked different?
And William’s action: Realize that we are polarized in our thinking, that what you think is true for yourself, is not necessarily right, it can just be your opinion, not fact. And be mindful of that, and be ready to have your mind changed.
The second question comes from Vinroy, Linstead, Jamaica - “A million Earths could fit into the space taken up by our Sun. With that concept in mind, do our problems, issues, disagreement, fashions etc etc etc, really mean anything?”
For such a BIG question which Vinroy has raised here, your co-hosts come up with two big actions.
Stuart’s action: look at a problem you've got today and set it against the enormity of the universe. Any issues long term, or short term that you may have, your friends, may have , the people around you may have. Does it matter? Is it of anything of significance? Be it disagreements and fashions? They're just like a blip. Does any of this really mean anything?
William’s action: he encourages you to go out there and, and lead a good life, and actually just be kinder to people that are around you. And if you operate from that point of view, and you see that somebody else is actually having struggles themselves. You are only gonna make the world a better place.
During the discussion of this question, William mentions the Hubble Telescope Deep Field, you can find out more about this with the following link: Hubble Telescope Deep Field
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Stuart and William don't see the listener questions before they press record. They don't really have guests. They explore these topics cold without preparation. Not trying to be the go-to experts as they feel there are enough out there already, they see themselves as the go-to guys who are willing to explore things cold.
Scott, Arisaig, Scotland - “What are your biggest challenges personally in 2025, and what are the biggest culturally?”
Stuart marched into 2025 armed with flipcharts, fire in his belly, and a dream of accessible fields for all. But by March, the flipcharts were supporting a sad-looking houseplant, and his greatest obstacle was not uneven terrain, but patience and acceptance toward his own ill-health. He’d tried yoga, herbal tea, and shouting at ducks—none worked.
Meanwhile, William’s job title changed so often it needed a loyalty card. One day consultant, next day “freelance strategist of vibes.” He embraced the chaos like a man at a buffet who forgot what he came for.
Culturally, both were baffled. Stuart declared British culture was invisible but everywhere—like damp. William wondered if he was English, British, or just someone who owned a teapot and too many socks.
Their shared mission? End othering, talk to strangers, and dismantle the great wall of cultural confusion one biryani-powered chat at a time. Because progress starts with a ramp—and maybe a really good biscuit.
Jess, Bishop’s Tatchbrook, Warwickshire, England - “Unless it's on the edge of disaster and on the precipice, humanity never seems to want to change, adapt and evolve. Discuss”.
Stuart insists that “change,” “adapt,” and “evolve” are not synonyms, despite what motivational posters and management consultants would have us believe. Change, he says, is swapping oat milk for cow’s milk and pretending it’s just as good. Adapt is realising your oat milk curdles in tea but drinking it anyway. Evolve is becoming lactose-intolerant and being smug about it.
William thinks the climate crisis is like waiting for a Hollywood meteor—we want a big dramatic moment before reacting. Meanwhile, Europe is quietly crisping like the forgotten toast languishing in the bottom of a bag belonging to a fellow Speedway supporter of Stuart’s. He points out we've already had the disaster movie, we just missed the trailer.
They agree: humanity is great at adapting... often in ways that make things worse. Evolution won’t save us—it takes millennia, and we’ve barely got until next Thursday. But if individuals act, influence leaders, and maybe stop voting for people who think climate change is just “weather being moody,” there’s hope.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
You the listeners send in questions to talk about. Your co-hosts Stuart and William, try and spin it round to the environment in some way. Neither see the questions before they press record. No preparation, they try and hopefully, a little bit like you, approach this stuff cold.
Scott, Arisaig, Scotland - “Rewilding, a significant contemporary movement, entails the restoration and enhancement of local, regional, and international food chains and biodiversity. However, there is no singularly correct method for ecosystem management and conservation. Should we not, therefore, prioritize the rewilding of our own lives, thoughts, and perspectives first, before starting this journey? Alternatively, should we at the very least consider rewilding ourselves concurrently with wider ecological initiatives? Presently, this personal aspect of rewilding is often deferred until substantial progress has been made in ecological rewilding elsewhere, which creates separation between humankind and the wider natural world”.
William affirms that humans are part of nature—we’re animals, not separate. Stuart shares a curiosity about rewilding, which he sees as enriching biodiversity, not just letting things grow unchecked. William outlines three approaches: maintaining the present, restoring the past, or imagining something new. Stuart argues there’s no single right way, stressing that nature is diverse and complex.
Stuart feels somewhat “wild” already and values continually challenging his perspective. Insight, he believes, is fluid—something earned over and over. William echoes this, asking how disconnected we’ve become from nature and whether we’re aligning with broader ecological efforts or staying isolated.
In terms of action, Stuart calls for personal reflection: what does rewilding mean to you? William challenges rewilding’s stereotypes, arguing it’s not just for the whimsical—it’s a conscious break from consumerism and disconnection.
Floss, Gimli, Manitoba, Canada - “We too readily judge a book by its cover, and we know that, but readily overlook, that to just see the outside is limiting, as most things of substance happen on the inside. One of the greatest freedoms we can experience ourselves, and can offer others, is how we react to things, situations and people. Really, the only things worth doing, of true value, is that which we do for others. So we need to remember to avoid making quick assumptions about people and whether they're decent types, until we have the facts”.
William agrees with Floss’s point that we instinctively judge by appearances—it’s how we try to make sense of things. His call to action is to view those around us as potential allies, friends, or simply connections—there’s always potential.
Stuart notes we often forget we judge by appearances and reminds us that whether it’s a person, animal, or ecosystem, the truly important things happen beneath the surface. William tries to see beyond the exterior. Stuart questions if we’re honest about the image we present and sees widespread inauthenticity.
William reframes the idea: to help others, we must work on knowing ourselves. There’s nothing wrong with also gaining from giving. Stuart advises withholding judgment until we know the facts.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
“You often talk about the talks you give. Is your style accidental, evolving and planned?”
This is the first of two listener questions your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow discuss in this episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. This question was sent in by Unity in Paddock Wood, Kent, England.
From Unity’s question, Stuart and William discuss how, though their talks are planned, with bullet-pointed scripts, they allow THEM to naturally evolve, and are mostly improvised. In particular their talk ‘Wildlife In Everyday Gardens’, which has aspects of audience participation, including them choosing what topics will be covered from a list of 10 challenges.
Stuart concludes the discussion around Unity’s question with some sage advice for environmental speakers: Engage your audience, don't lecture down to them. Take your audience with you rather than presenting them the top of your head as you read a script.
The second listener question for this episode comes from Kate in Rathlin Island, Northern Ireland.
“It’s said that the ghosts of childhood rattle around in adult bodies. I’ve been thinking about this and wondered what you both think. What still rattles in you? We maintain arguments in our adult heads, often with people who don’t exist anymore, or just a memory.
How others were when you were a child, in part, is due to their own upbringing, and we all have to try and move on from that. Surrounding ourselves with the people who get the best out of us. I also agree with the statement that life happens through us, not to us. Little is set in stone.
We need to avoid jumping to the first response that comes to mind, we have the ability to focus and send our thoughts in directions of our choosing. People's opinions of us are often none of our business, it's their stuff.
The pressure they put on us is more about them. We all, if we choose to recognise it, put things on others and criticise on things, that we feel we are weak on ourselves. When we realise things can be more fun, simply by changing nothing apart from how we think, things can just fall into place.
I agree we are performing mental gymnastics just to exist, but we do occasionally need an outsider to point out our behaviours and triggers. We really should get therapy before we need it, and realise what we are capable of.
We need to live in conscious ways and be self secure. We need to truly listen more and realise what we are trying to teach and advise others about, is again often what we need to learn ourselves”.
William sees that our childhood self isn't separate, we still are that child, just an older version. He goes on to reflect on how the lack of guidance in his young life still affects him.
Stuart talks of how he grew up in a "very unpleasant family" and how he is constantly motivated by not wanting to be like them.
Stuart goes on to compare the human the mind to soil - without constant work, it reverts to its original state. He concludes that therapy comes in many forms, including walking.
William philosophises that "Little is set in stone" - the only constant is change. An action: He advises persistence in breaking negative thought patterns, and to be prepared as it might take multiple attempts to break those patterns.
Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Floss from Gimli, Manitoba, Canada set the first of two listener questions in today’s episode
“Do either of you feel you have guardian angels?”
Stuart and William come at Floss’s question in two very unique ways, which reflects how different they are from each other.
William refuses to believe in literal guardian angels, as he feels you need to believe in actual angels. He does however acknowledge how the presence of important people in his life could be like having a guardian angel.
Stuart believes that he has certain people from his past "on his shoulder", informing his thinking, and that he has felt their physical presence at periods in his life. He feels that he has at least two guardian angels.
Stuart puts an environmental spin on this question, with a question of his own: How can humans be guardian angels of planet Earth?
The second listener question comes from Paula in Norfolk, England.
“Anything currently annoying you with the use of modern language?”
Off the back of Paula’s question, Stuart shares his dislike for fashionable phrases that are essentially meaningless filler. William agrees. He has a particular dislike of the overuse of “bro” and "super". Both do acknowledge however that they might just be "old and cranky".
The big takeaway from this discussion is that Stuart and William advocate for using a varied vocabulary and not to rely on the same words, repeatedly, and most importantly, for communication to be genuine. Listen to yourself and others, use varied vocabulary, fill sentences with value rather than filler words.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Scott, a listener from Arisaig, Scotland sets today's first question - “We have rebranded tourism, to backpacking, walking, cycling, mountaineering and exploring etc, so as to get an authentic experience of a place. Though in getting that authentic experience, often we turn a blind eye and we see places how we want to, not how they really are. In ways that fit our own narrative, maybe overly romantic? Maybe that's why when we revisit a place it often is not as good as we remember it? So those authentic experiences are skewed and informed by our own internal habits and processes. We readily overlook the impacts we are having, behaving like sheep, following the crowd, and going on mass to get these authentic experiences?”
Join co-hosts Stuart and William on a wild ride through the contradictory world of travel. Stuart argues that all that backpacking, hiking, and cycling is mere "passing through"—nothing like truly diving into the heart of a culture. He even recounts safari adventures that leave you questioning if you're witnessing nature or a scene from a horror flick (spoiler: those animals aren’t just posing for a selfie—they’re feasting without mercy!). Meanwhile, William champions the power of local interactions, insisting that true cultural insights come from chatting with the locals, not ticking off tourist landmarks on a map.
In each episode, our duo engages in a hilarious tug-of-war: Is travel about immersing yourself in the raw, unpredictable pulse of a foreign land, or merely curating a safe, picture-perfect postcard life? Stuart’s anti-tourism stance collides with William’s conscious, soul-searching travel vibe, leaving no cliché unchallenged and no tourist untouched. Their final piece of advice? If you're going to be a tourist, do it sustainably—think outside the mass flock and embrace your inner rebel.
Strap in for candid debates, laugh-out-loud stories, and a fresh perspective on how travel can either be a genuine adventure or just another scheduled excursion. Tune in, because when authenticity meets absurdity, the conversation is anything but ordinary!
What unconventional travel mishap or unexpected local encounter has made you question your holiday choices? Let's keep the conversation going!
Oisin, from Cork, Ireland sets the second question - Oisin’s Question
History isn’t just written—it’s wielded. In this thought-provoking chat, Stuart and William unravel the complexities of Ireland’s past and its lingering impact on today. From the historic rivalry between Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael to the British government’s strategic hands-off approach that allowed internal strife to flourish, they explore how political maneuvering has shaped nations.
Stuart delves into how famines can be leveraged for social change, citing the Irish famine as a tragic example where suffering became an opportunity—intentional or not. Meanwhile, William sheds light on the erasure of Irish history in British education and asks: What do we conveniently forget, and why? The conversation expands to immigration, drawing parallels between past acceptance of Irish migrants in America and current hostility toward newcomers.
Together, they emphasize a vital message: We must acknowledge history without weaponizing it—learning from past injustices without falling into the trap of blame. Tune in for an educational deep dive that challenges perceptions and uncovers the hidden forces shaping societies today.
Which overlooked moments in history have shaped the world more than we realize? Let’s dig into it!
Send us a question to discuss to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wow
Help us to spread the podcast. Share this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast. Find out all about the podcast via this one link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
“I heard someone on TV say they didn’t think Essex had wildlife, until someone said wildlife is everywhere. What is the world coming to?” That's the question left by listener James, in Ecclefechan, Scotland for your co-hosts Stuart and William to delve into.
Wildlife? More Like Wild Conspiracies! Join William and Stuart as they dissect the absurdities of British wildlife with all the enthusiasm of a damp Saturday in Colchester. William opens by suggesting that if you haven’t graced Colchester with your presence, then clearly you’ve missed out on all the subtle wonders it has to offer—even if they’re as unexciting as a bus stop in the drizzle.
Stuart then delves into the baffling story from thirty years back, when someone reckoned that North Wales was practically bird-free—simply because no one bothered to record them. That is, until a slightly under-the-weather bird watcher on Anglesey made the inconvenient discovery that, shocker, birds do exist. Yes, even in a landscape where no one takes notes, nature finds a way to upend common sense.
Ever the inquisitor, William questions which part of Essex this supposed wildlife desert applies to, considering that even the busiest corners of the county attract a touch of life. Stuart is quick to chime in: if your idea of wildlife is confined to roaming elephants and lions, you’re in for a rude awakening—try rolling back your carpet and what's under there.
For the pièce de résistance, they tackle the wild conspiracy theories claiming that not only does New Zealand not exist, but neither does Finland. So naturally, it’s a short leap of logic to imagine that Essex is just a barren wasteland devoid of any real wildlife.
Martin, from Portree, Scotland sets the next question - “Heard you say you are not that active as a photographer these days William, do you see a time where you’d go back to it? Here in Portree, for a large part of the year, the landscape is multiple layers of grey. Have you done much photography with such a simple pallet?”
Martin's question was the wake-up call William didn't know he needed. While other projects hogged the schedule, the camera was left gathering dust, and he admits he never quite granted himself the freedom to simply go out and shoot. Now though, he's slowly easing back into photography, sharing the notion that layers in landscape photography can transform even the most ordinary view into something with unexpected depth.
Meanwhile, Stuart spices things up with a side story. He recounts a tale of a Portree painter who was so fixated on capturing the ever-changing moods of grey that she found herself painting four different canvases in the span of a single day. Apparently, the local weather wasn't content with just one look—each passing moment demanded its own portrait.
Reflecting on his past and looking to the future, William confesses a need for subject matter that truly resonates with him. Back in the day, he was a prolific railway photographer with a portfolio that got plenty of press and the satisfaction of mastering a craft he loved. Now, with a renewed sense of purpose, he's dipping his toes into photography once again—and you can catch his latest snaps on Instagram under the handle @shotatanangle.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
“I’ve heard youngsters say in the olden days we never had mobiles, and how did we survive? This worries me. Ok youngsters are tech savvy, but they perhaps lack the ability to adapt quickly if tech fails them?”
This is the first of the two listener questions sent in for Stuart and William to discuss in today’s episode, this particular question came from Wayne in Bangor, Maine, USA.
Off the back of Wayne’s question, William recounts his own observations, where he has witnessed a younger person than him, attempting to pay for a bus ride on their phone, and when it hasn’t worked, they have not been able to pay by any other method, and therefore haven’t been able to travel. Off the back of this point, he comes up with an action: to always carry a backup with you, in this case a wallet with a physical payment card.
Stuart comes at the question from a different angle, he sets the lofty challenge of giving life without a mobile a go, and to see how you get on. William takes Stuart’s point and posits the idea that we need to strike a balance here. That phones are useful, but not to overly rely on them.
The second question for this episode comes from Paula in Norfolk, England.
“Huge amounts of trees are being planted to combat climate change, perhaps too many? Many die, because they are not cared for. How about Community Tree Ambassadors to keep an eye on them?”
The big bee in Stuart’s bonnet regarding Paula’s question is that though tree ambassadors can be potentially helpful, they can also just be a token gesture. He relates a story about one man in Oxford who set up a committee to plant more trees in the city, called The Forest of Oxford. The committee was populated by local people, but if this guy disagreed with you, he would overrule it and say the committee had made an alternative decision, when it was really him as an individual making that move. The group was really a toothless tiger, only there to give false credence and facilitate the guy's vision, which he couldn’t implement alone. He raises the question: How do we stop the tree ambassadors becoming a token gesture?
William’s opinion takes us to the very root of the matter, that planting trees is not the sole solution to the environmental crisis as trees only form one part of the ecosystem in the first place. And when they are planted, they often aren't looked after.
In this podcast your co-hosts Stuart and William discuss questions the listeners have sent in. Get ready to join the chaos of their live audio circus, where your intrepid hosts dive headfirst into your listener-supplied mystery boxes of questions. They may chat, they might bicker—but rest assured, there's no fancy pre-reading. They discuss them, they rarely debate them. Sometimes a surprise guest or an unsuspecting listener takes center stage in The Listeners Chair, adding extra spice to the mix. It’s unscripted, unpredictable, and as raw as your first cup of coffee—so buckle up and enjoy the unfiltered ride! Most importantly Stuart and William don’t see the question before the press record, so their reactions and opinions come to you in real time, and they most likely start from the same position as you the listener at the start of the recording. Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
On this podcast there aren’t necessarily debates, more often they are off the cuff conversations. You, the listeners, set the questions that your, co-hosts don’t see until they start recording.
This episode is not an exception to that as there’s talk about Stuart’s recent appearance on the ProGRESS Podcast, and a thought-provoking reflection questioning whether humanity’s progress is driven by rare geniuses, while the rest of us cling to their achievements and grapple with uncomfortable truths about our nature, and opinions.
The first of the two listener questions comes from Lucas in Punta Arenas, Chile - “Stuart heard your interview on The ProGRESS Podcast. Where does your drive to be genuine and honest in business come from, do you think? Where do you think your internal drive comes from that you spoke about separately at the end?”
From this question, Stuart talks about how his drive to be genuine and honest in business comes from the same place as where the drive to be genuine and honest in personal life. He grew up in a family full of bullshit, distortion, lies, suppression, oppression and belittlement. He doesn't want to be like them.
He goes onto spin the question to an environmental slant: what drives you to care about the environment? And maybe put yourself in the shoes of somebody who is having a negative impact on the environment, and what drives them to do that and to maybe not even care.
If you would like to listen to the episodes, here are the links:
Part 1
Part 2
The second question today comes from Bronwen in Atlanta, Georgia, USA - “Are humans really that advanced, or do we rely on the occasional genius to make our species jump, leaving the rest of us merely hanging on to their coattails, and just narcissistic apes? I know some people will deny that we are apes, and they are entitled to their opinion, as am I. It doesn't mean their or my opinion overthrows a point of fact, it's still just their opinion. Are we really advanced if we fool ourselves into thinking we are offended by someone's opinions that differ from ours, when they are really offended by points of fact?”
Off the back of Bronwen’s question, William feels that we have more geniuses around us, he cites the progress humans have made over the past 200 years. There's always people out there with interesting minds, and they come up with really interesting ideas.
Stuart asks the question: are our evolutionary jumps driven by these geniuses? When those geniuses make their discoveries, a large volume of the rest of us then jump on that bandwagon. Is that mass movement what makes us have an evolutionary jump, not the genius’s actions?
Stuart picks up that there are two sides to Bronwen’s question, and the core to the second part is that opinion is not fact. There are facts out there that as far as we understand them to be facts, and people can be offended by someone's unfounded opinion or founded facts, but it's just how you deal with that offense. You're offended. Deal with it. Process it. Feedback on it, try and improve the situation. Just because you are offended, doesn't mean someone is always being offensive.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/PeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/peoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
This episode was recorded in Stuart’s garden, so expect in the background, people shouting, horns, sirens, Harley’s revving, all sorts. If you’re struggling to filter out the background noise and not focus in on the question, that's something you need to practice, because when your co-hosts are out having a conversation in this garden space, they don't even notice the background sounds very often. So that's the thing, life is a noisy place and you get presented with these big questions at inconvenient times, so we all need to learn to filter at any given moment.
Ray, from Sauk Centre, Minnesota, USA is the lucky listener asking the first question - “Do you think countries that benefited from the slave trade should pay compensation to the descendants of slaves. Is it fair to pay for wrong doings of ancestors, and is it wrong to accept compensations for things your ancestors experienced? Are all white people racist if they are living off privileges afforded them by their forefathers? For balance, are modern day slave descendants, victims? Is it potentially better though to work towards a fairer society, instead of compensation? It can maybe be argued that compensations won’t make a difference in a society that remains inherently unfair?”
Stuart and William discuss reparations, fairness, and historical context. Stuart emphasizes the importance of understanding history to build a better future. William examines unconscious biases and how ancestral privilege shapes opportunities. Rather than financial compensation, Stuart argues for acknowledgment and proactive change. William stresses that achieving a fair society requires recognizing existing privilege. They both highlight the need for balanced historical perspectives and thoughtful action beyond monetary solutions.
Mateusz, from Rzeszow, Poland sets the second question for discussion today and as it is quite lengthy, we have put it in a separate document which you can find here - Mateusz’s Question
William and Stuart dive into pronouns, identity, and how labels can matter—or not. William, a self-described "CIS white male (but don’t call him that)," sees pronouns mostly in emails and social media but acknowledges that openly sharing them can help others feel comfortable. Stuart recounts an awkward business meeting where he avoided stating his pronoun and paid the price. They agree that inclusion means normalizing differences without making a spectacle of them. William sees identity as secondary to kindness and competence, while Stuart laments society’s slow progress in LGBTQ+ acceptance since the 1970s. They conclude with a universal truth—offending someone is inevitable, so keep messaging clear, direct, and free of unnecessary complexity.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
Floss, in Gimli, Manitoba, Canada is the listener who set the first question today - “What are your objectives, personally and with your work?”
William aspires to live a fulfilling life by practicing kindness, spending time with loved ones, and embracing diverse experiences. Both personally and professionally, he seeks growth through challenges and stepping out of his comfort zone.
Stuart, on the other hand, values enjoying life's journey. His professional focus is on establishing the Disabled Countryside Access CIC to enhance accessibility, with the long-term aim of transitioning to part-time work to prioritize health and well-being.
These perspectives highlight different approaches to personal and professional fulfillment.
James, from Ecclefechan, Scotland is the listener setting the next question - “In the little known mountainous areas of Greece, down toward Albania I think, the government are issuing sheep farmers with huge sheep dogs, to help keep bears and wolves away that roam the area. We need to find ways like this to live alongside larger animals and not shoot on sight. What do you think?”
Stuart and William feel farmers are now adopting non-lethal strategies to manage bear encounters, choosing to deter rather than eliminate these animals. This approach not only promotes more humane interactions but also influences local decision-making towards sustainable practices.
Understanding that bears view farms as extensions of their territory emphasizes the importance of educating communities about animal behavior—a key step in reducing conflicts.
Moreover, drawing an analogy to coastal sea defenses, one can question whether such interventions might shift bear activity in unforeseen ways, much like how sea defenses alter the natural energy flow of the ocean. Investigating these hidden dynamics could lead to more effective and balanced wildlife management strategies.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
The first question that Stuart and William wade into in today’s episode, comes from Ray in Sauk Centre, Minnesota, USA - “None of us are getting out of this alive. We’re all heading in the same direction. Don’t you think there's something profound in that?”
Right off the bat, William agrees with Ray, that none of us are getting out of this alive. He goes on to make the point that we like to avoid the subject of our own mortality.
Stuart feels there is a profundity to the fact that we all eventually die, and how it is the one shared experience that we all will have.
Stuart then tries to bring the conversation around to the environment: if we have very few shared experiences, how can we hope to live sustainably? Both he and William find this a tough question to even begin to answer, it is a big question.
There are always two listener questions per episode, and the second one comes from another Ray, this time from Newmilns, Scotland - “I hear people talking about the Cocaine trade, and the submarines arriving in Spain, smuggling the drugs from Latin America. I’m also hearing the drug trade in UK prisons is worth a reported 1 billion pounds a year, which is interesting when set aside something like the UK carpet industry, which I know is worth just 900 million pounds a year. It's reported that some prison wardens themselves are smuggling drug packages into prisons as they know how to bypass checks, and that they are paid £400 per package. Now, what I want you to explore on this podcast is, corruption amongst those tasked with administering positive change, in the prison system and also in the climate change world, is seriously damaging. How can the rest of us manage the impact of these disruptors?”
Stuart starts off the conversation, talking about how some prison wardens are good, some are bad, but these drugs are getting into the prisons somehow. He likes how Ray has spun this question towards the environment.
Stuart recognises the corruption among those people who are tasked with making a change. He knows people who have been through the prison system, are going through the prison system, will go through the prison system, and their families think they'll be rehabilitated.
And if the people who are meant to be rehabilitating the prison prisoners are corrupt in themselves, the point's been missed. He feels that you can’t avoid corruption, but it just needs to be flagged up, and the boil lanced.
Stuart carries on the point that we need to openly talk about this issue, and instead of getting annoyed, we need to be proactive, remove the disruptors, and get better people in.
William follows on this point, how we as humans can be easily motivated, particularly by money. This is sometimes because we need the money, or it could be that we are bullied into it. It is part of a system which the prison officers are quite literally locked into.
Stuart and William conclude the conversation about vetting processes, and how they can be used to weed out the disruptors.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
On this podcast, the questions are set by you, the listeners. Even though the questions are often detached from the environment, we always try and bring back the discussion to it in some way.
In today’s episode, Stuart and William, your co-hosts, chew the fat over two intriguing questions, the first of which comes from Bartek in Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England - “I have not asked any question since 2020 I don’t think, but always listen whilst I work. I see some of the UK royal family are pushing forward anti homelessness and anti domestic abuse projects. Should they abstain from such things or should they use their status in these ways?”
Stuart feels an undercurrent from the question, that Bartek is possibly an anti monarchist. He sees the question being more “should they exist and should they be sticking their nose in if they do?” His conclusion though, is that the royal family do have a status in society, and they should be doing something good, however he often feels they do more bad than good.
Throughout this discussion, both Stuart and William in some way, express anti-monarchy sentiment, which deviates from Bartek’s question a bit, but that is how they rock on this podcast, they often allow the conversation to weave and meander, like a shopping trolly with a dodgy wheel, as you never know where the conversation might lead?
The second question comes from a listener that William is, for no reason at all, particularly afraid of, that person being Debs in Didcot, Oxfordshire, England - “1 in ten (if not more) of 4 year olds in the UK are considered obese. Yet when parents are advised how to help their children lose wait, they often close their ears. Is that because as a nation we’re not emotionally mature enough to take this feedback on board?”
William starts the conversation by bringing up how people don’t like to be told when they are doing something wrong in their lives. Off the back of this bold statement, Stuart relates a story from his time in Manchester, how a group of kids were seen as feral, and their parents weren’t bothered as it was how they were brought up, and it hadn’t harmed them in their opinion.
Stuart and William then steer the conversation towards how we need to consider the impact of cheap processed foods. Stuart sees it as an indication of the lifestyle, the processes we live by. That it isn’t all down to telling parents how to bring up their children better. He feels that we need to look at the whole way we live.
Stuart’s conclusion for this question: we need to put systems in place to allow people to make better decisions.
William concludes that a good community can also make a positive impact. The difference between a person in power like a teacher, and a member of your own community advising you, can make a big difference.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
This podcast is not really a debate. It's more of a conversation. Listeners send in questions for discussion and we’ve got up to 50 questions still to get through. Some aren’t about the countryside or the environment, but co-hosts Stuart and William try and bring them beck to the environment in some way, with the actions they come up with.
Ched, sets the first question from Port-Au-Prince, Haiti - “Who or what is the world's super power?”
William initially suggests the USA as an answer to Ched's question but quickly shifts to a broader perspective. He identifies the real superpower as the ability to create an inclusive and effective community—a dynamic where people from diverse backgrounds connect, exchange ideas, and spark transformative progress. Stuart views Earth's superpower as its innate ability to foster and sustain life, a universal and extraordinary quality beyond the confines of planet Earth.
William quotes physicist Brian Cox, emphasizing humanity's unique capacity to marvel at the universe and suggesting that losing this trait would be a profound loss. Their discussion diverges into intriguing tangents: William explores the concept of large numbers by converting them into relatable measures like time, while Stuart delves into the mysteries of black holes, pondering what happens to the matter within if a black hole ceases to exist.
Fendy, from Dajabon, Haiti offers up the next question - “Is it good to be busy?”
William begins by asserting that busyness for its own sake is counterproductive, though it may serve as a useful distraction in difficult times. He cites gardening and housework as examples of purposeful activity. Drawing on his business experience, Stuart observes that many people appear busy while accomplishing little, which he describes as a form of self-sabotage. They further note that some individuals maintain an image of busyness without engaging in substantively meaningful work. Stuart then shifts the focus to consider how one might achieve effectiveness without unnecessary preoccupation, prompting William to recall a U.S. podcast on activism that stressed the importance of balancing dedicated efforts with periods of disengagement to avoid missing critical opportunities.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
Debs, in Didcot, Oxfordshire, England is the listener who sets the first question for discussion - “You often say we are part of nature and not separate from it. To that end, with balance, it's ok for humans to alter land. So restoring it back to how it was before man even walked the Earth may be a red herring. I’ve heard you say when we are trying to look after a section of land, are we aiming to turn it into what it was, what it is or what we want it to be? So planting trees everywhere, maybe even where trees wouldn’t normally be found, may be destroying rare biodiversity. It may also become a monoculture, with some things dieing out as we are only thinking of the canopy, not the understory and other kinds of habitats. Maybe with the correct management from humans biodiversity could increase more than if we died out and left nature to do its own thing?”
Stuart kicks off the chat by pointing out that humans have really done a number on the landscape. Apparently, habitats are all over the place, literally. You get the driftwood from the destruction and a lovely patch of what might eventually be woodland if we keep our fingers crossed. The countryside’s current look? Yeah, that’s courtesy of 10,000 years of human tinkering. And to keep biodiversity afloat, we can't just sit back and do nothing—we need to roll up our sleeves and get involved.
Stuart reckons Debs hits the nail on the head about tree planting. Unfortunately, we seem to have mastered the art of doing it all wrong. He then goes on to clarify that rewilding isn’t just a fancy term for sitting on our hands.
William chimes in, pointing out the environmental wreckage visible from aerial images. His book, featuring aerial maps of the UK, seems to suggest fields dominate the view—fields and more fields.
Stuart raises the important point that, pre-humans, biodiversity was thriving. If we don’t give nature a helping hand, that biodiversity might just wave us goodbye.
Finally, Stuart pops the big question: What’s the endgame when we meddle in nature? He reckons we ought to aim for greater biodiversity and, yes, it’s perfectly fine for us to step in.
William throws in the idea of thinking long-term about biodiversity. He mentions Capability Brown, the landscape gardener who never actually saw the fruits of his labor mature. But he had a long-term vision, and that’s something we should all aspire to.
Ray, Sauk Centre, Minnesota, USA - “Here’s a challenge! What 3 words would you use to describe each other?”
Stuart sums up William in three delightful words: Unguided, as if he missed the memo from the wisdom club; Doubtful, because a healthy dose of skepticism is apparently his thing; and Creative, which could be either a compliment or a polite way of saying "a bit out there."
On the flip side, William describes Stuart with: Contradictive (yes, he just invented this gem), Focused, like a dog with a bone, and Ridiculous, because why not add a splash of absurdity?
If they ever revisit this exercise, they’d probably choose completely different words.
Stuart quips to Ray, “Please, spare us from such questions in the future—it was sheer torture!”
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair Fundraiser: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Before we get into the meat and bones of this episode, an announcement. This podcast will be ending in 2030 and by our calculations, if we carry on the same rate of listens for the next five years, we’ll reach 800,000 in total. So dear listener, here is where you come in. Share this podcast with 5 of your friends today and help us reach the 1 million listen mark before we bring this podcast to a close. Simples!
Now on with the show, and in today’s episode Stuart and William discuss two of those listener questions, beginning with this corker from Jess in Bishop’s Tatchbrook, Warwickshire, England - “Random question for you today. Whats the most memorable live musical performance you’ve seen?”
For Stuart, the most memorable performance was Jimi Hendrix at Woodstock in 1969. He goes on to elaborate about the timing of the performance and what he gained from the experience, particularly highlighting Hendrix's improvisational skills.
When William interpreted this question, he saw it as being about performances actually witnessed in person, and since he has seen many memorable performances, he finds it difficult to select just one. However after a little internal deliberation he settles on two particular performances. One recent, and one from around 20 years ago.
The first was a performance of Beethoven's 5th piano concerto at Oxford's Sheldonian Theatre, where he was amazed by a virtuoso pianist playing entirely from memory. His second pick was seeing The White Stripes at the Shepherd's Bush Empire, where he was impressed by Jack White's stage presence and the duo's chemistry. He also concludes with an action: to see The Flaming Lips live, you won’t regret it!
After all that musical waffle, Stuart and William then go onto talk through the following question from Brenda in Northumberland, England - “I notice you don’t have too many promotional platforms, or try to do too many things. Is this because of time constraints or do you feel doing too many things and having too many offerings for your audience could be a distraction and divide your audience?”
Stuart initiates the discussion by explaining that time constraints limit their promotional efforts. He notes that expanding to new platforms can divide audience attention and potentially serve as an excuse for failure.
William goes on to describe their recording process, which ensures the podcast is consistently released on time. He emphasises that word of mouth remains their most effective form of promotion.
Stuart expands the conversation by expressing his frustration with creatives who constantly launch new channels or ideas rather than committing to one project and seeing it through.
Stuart points out for this podcast their listener numbers remain stable even without active promotion, which he sees as a testament to the podcast's success. He prefers maintaining a consistent audience rather than pursuing a boom-and-bust approach that chases listener numbers.
William concludes by questioning whether creatives truly understand the implications of having a large audience, suggesting many pursue big numbers without considering the consequences.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast, support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Welcome to The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow discuss questions sent in by listeners.
In today’s episode both questions come from the country of Scotland, with Teasag in Moffat posing the following - “How do we know what any word means?”
Stuart begins the discussion around Teasag’s question by challenging categorical thinking, emphasizing the contextual nature of understanding. William expands on this theme, focusing on language development. He argues; that language is fundamentally conceptual, with words evolving dynamically; over time.
Stuart goes on to delve into the process of inquiry, with Stuart emphasizing the importance of repeated questioning and verification. This approach suggests a methodical and critical thinking process, where initial assumptions are constantly challenged and re-examined.
The second listener question from Scotland was sent in by Brice in Crieff, Scotland - “Have you ever been discriminated against?”
Stuart offers a profound personal account of experiencing discrimination within a professional networking context. During an encounter with the owner of a networking group in Oxfordshire, he was confronted about his bandages, with the suggestion that his appearance and behaviour was making others feel obligated to help him. This pivotal moment crystallized an important realization for Stuart: the critical importance of surrounding yourself with the right people.
Off the back of this story, both Stuart and William offer up actions for you to ponder on.
With regards to discrimination, Stuart offers this advice, that it's what you do with the discrimination, how you confront it, how you break it down. You're never gonna stop it, but you shouldn't just let it go unchallenged either. Also he suggests trying to see where the line between your own discriminations and assumptions are. Because an assumption can quickly evolve into discrimination if you don't back away from it.
William’s action is that when you look at somebody who is just different to you. Maybe they wear different clothes to you. Maybe they just look different to you in whatever way that is. Maybe they have a different religion to you. He encourages you to try to see through that discrimination and to see that person standing in front of you.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Brenda, from Northumberland, England, sets your two co-hosts the first of today's listeners' questions - “Some people feel meteorites seeded Earth with chemicals and substances that helped the soup of life evolve. Could DNA have been seeded too? Some feel other life forms have been sending meteors to seed our planet and direct the course of our evolution too. Should we rule anything out as much of science is based on hunches etc”.
William kicks off the chat with his earth-shattering revelation that comets are apparently the unsung heroes of life's origin story on our planet. He then meanders into a bizarre discussion with Stuart about the idea that meteorites might be sentient beings. Stuart, in his infinite wisdom, muses that these space rocks could be life's catalysts, but with the brilliant insight that there's an assumption of life beyond Earth.
William, in a dazzling display of ignorance, poses the existential question: How did DNA come to be? Shockingly, he admits he doesn't have a clue.
He then passionately rails against Brenda's so-called "hunches," declaring that science is based on observing reality instead of flights of fancy. Stuart, ever the skeptic, dismisses the notion that other species sent these meteorites to seed the planet as mere science fiction, teetering on the edge of paranoia.
William heroically attempts to explain that theories in science aren't mere guesswork but are meticulously documented and reviewed. He spins this into an environmental rant, highlighting that every scientific discipline is screaming about the havoc we're wreaking on the planet.
Stuart wraps up with his groundbreaking advice: If a door closes in your face, open it again. Because, surprise, that's what doors are supposed to do.
The second listener question comes in from Paula, Norfolk, England - “Do you feel the freedom to say whatever you want on your podcast?”
William starts this riveting discussion with the ever-ambiguous “yes, but…” because who doesn’t love a good contradiction right off the bat?
Stuart chimes in with the groundbreaking observation that they have freedom, with some responsibility—an astonishing revelation. He then drops the bombshell that no matter what, someone’s going to get offended. Not that they’re being offensive, of course, but people are just so sensitive these days.
Stuart then proceeds to challenge the notion that you need to be an academic to voice your opinion, because who needs expertise when you have a platform and an opinion?
When William speaks on the podcast, he actually thinks about what he’s saying, which is a refreshing change in today’s world of mindless chatter. He prides himself on voicing his own truths—because the world definitely needs more personal truths.
William then tackles the delicate subject of causing offense, suggesting that the best way forward is communication.
Stuart wraps up this episode with some profound advice: in your own life, think about should it be said, not could it be said. A nugget of wisdom that’s sure to leave listeners pondering the mysteries of the universe.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support us work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
Yenifer, from Provincia De Panamá, Panama sets the first listener question today - “Any advice on how to manage stress?”
William discusses the benefits of meditation as an effective tool for stress management. He emphasizes that regular practice can help individuals cultivate a habit, which is essential for reaping the long-term benefits. He has been engaging in guided meditation sessions for six months and finds that it helps him organize his thoughts and detach from stress.
Stuart introduces the idea of not being influenced by others' experiences and stresses. He asserts that while you cannot control external stressors, you can manage your response to them. He elaborates that stress may never be entirely eliminated, but the key lies in how you react to it.
William concludes that stress management involves handling both personal and external stressors effectively.
Stuart emphasizes the importance of taking proactive steps to manage stress. He shares a thought-provoking analogy: if faced with a dire situation, such as standing before a firing squad, a person might choose to remain calm and accept the situation, understanding that it is temporary with you inner voice saying “I'm not going to wish these people any harm, they're acting out their role, my job is to experience this as calmly as I can”. Stuart and William continue discussing meditation, highlighting its similarity to maintaining a regular exercise routine. William notes that consistent practice is crucial, while Stuart emphasizes the importance of understanding what meditation entails to benefit fully from it.
Debs, from Didcot, Oxfordshire, England asks today second question - “Is gardening a cure or just a help, or both?”
What's the deal with this 'cure'? A cure for what, exactly? Is what Stuart wonders initially. He doesn't think of it as a cure-all but admits it can help with various things.
William claims gardening can be the ultimate stress buster, answering Yenifer's question. He shares his personal experience. It gets you outside, surrounded by greenery, and gives you a good physical workout. Still though, he isn't sure if it's a cure. Maybe it helps, but it's got to be part of a bigger plan he muses.
Stuart chimes in, pointing out the different schools of thought on the benefits of getting your hands dirty. He's always hesitant to use the word "cure". You can also pop a pill, but it just helps you get by, he says. There are rarely permanent cures.
He then shares a story about a neighbor who couldn't understand growing a tomato plant that only yielded three tomatoes a year. For Stuart, it's all about the simple joy of being out there.
Stuart wraps it up with a practical tip: Try gardening, even if it's just some guerrilla gardening in your local area.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
This is a chatcast style podcast, that is our genre. Every episode, we discuss two listener questions, and we always try to draw the conversation back to nature or the environment in some way where possible, always aiming to stop the big issues, slipping into the shadows.
In today’s episode, we begin with a question sent in by Sekelaga, Zanzibar Urban West, Tanzania - “Are life long allegiances to political parties a balanced way to really be?”
William starts the conversation by reflecting how much the two major political parties in the UK (Conservatives and Labour) have changed throughout his own lifetime.
Stuart feels that we don’t need to spin this discussion to the environment as it immediately strikes a chord with environmentalism. He goes on to say that to blindly follow one thing, one person, one entity, one school of thought or doctrine, you are just a sheep. And if the people leading the parties know you're going to follow them whatever they do, they're not necessarily going to decide to do the right things.
Stuart and William then lead the conversation into the field of ‘footballification’ in politics, that whatever the party you follow says or does, you follow it blindly. William in particular sees a danger in that. Stuart agrees, and recounts a story of overhearing two football fans from opposing sides, with one fan admiring the other’s team, only to be shouted down that they should pick a side.
Stuart and William conclude, taking the conversation into the realm of political coalitions, and how they can be more powerful than a two party state.
The second question for your co-hosts to deliberate comes from Clodagh in Larne, County Antrim, Northern Ireland - “Reality seems to be fractured these days, with many feeling nothing is as it seems as everything is part of a greater conspiracy theory. What are the pro’s and con’s here?”
Right off the bat Stuart nails his colours to the mast: he feels that there's no such thing as reality. There are different perceptions, could be multi universes. So what is reality for us, It might not be a reality for somebody in another universe.
Stuart goes onto posit the idea that social media drives a lot of it, this move towards alternative facts, because it overwhelms us with possibilities. William echoes Stuart’s idea, that social media is a big influence here, that there are so many voices in our heads, there are also the algorithms that push us towards more confusion, more information overload.
William goes on to say that you can spend a lot of time and energy thinking about these things. And he thinks that's the con. You end up in this rabbit hole, you can end up in quite a bad place because you believe in these conspiracy theories, whether they're true or not.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
This is the podcast where questions sent in by listeners are discussed by your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow. Send yours today by emailing thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com.
In today’s episode the first question to be explored comes from Brenda in Northumberland, England - “How much of human life is lost, waiting?”
Off the back of Brenda’s question William observes that a significant portion of life is spent waiting. However, he distinguishes between different types of waiting, such as waiting for a train, waiting for a kettle to boil, and waiting for the right moment.
Stuart expands on this idea by exploring the difference between procrastination and strategic thinking. He continues William’s argument by highlighting how waiting can be purposeful, such as in chess, where one must wait for the right opportunity to make a move.
The second question was sent in by Gary from Hull, England - “Is the pursuit of diversity putting at risk excellence? Are the best people getting the key jobs, if we are playing the diversity card too readily?”.
Inspired by this question, Stuart begins by expressing concern that some appointments are made for the wrong reasons, feeling that, regardless of skin color, a more suitable candidate potentially could have been chosen. He sees some appointments as mere token gestures, rather than genuine selections based on merit.
Stuart then leads the discussion towards interconnectedness, referencing ‘The Hidden Life of Trees’, which suggests that a woodland functions as a single organism, where the strong support the weak. He argues that even if the best person isn’t always chosen for a role, diversity in culture, viewpoints, and perspectives, can ultimately strengthen the whole. He acknowledges both sides of this debate.
William shares an example from his wife’s workplace, where application information was removed to reduce unconscious bias in hiring. He also notes that hiring someone solely based on their minority status can, in some ways, be insulting.
Stuart concludes with a call to action: reconsider what defines the "best" candidate for a role. He is particularly ardent about representation, emphasizing that if it is to be done, it should come from a place of sincerity rather than obligation.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
This is a podcast where we try and persuade or entertain, inspire, and basically inform ourselves and you through conversation.
Paula, a listener from Norfolk, England asks the first question for Stuart and William to mull over. It’s a long question so we have put it in a separate document:Paula’s Question
Stuart and William kick things off with a spirited debate on why folks are moving in the first place. Stuart suggests it might be because of the perception that the UK offers more than other safe countries. William chimes in with something more fundamental - English is a widely spoken language (plus, who doesn’t love tea and crumpets?).
William then points to the right-wing rhetoric that claims people coming to the UK are just here to drain resources like an uninvited guest who eats all your snacks and leaves the toilet seat up.
Stuart goes on to talk about how the states these people pass through could act like a human sponge, absorbing everyone in transit (although that sounds like a superhero gone wrong). France wants the UK to do its part but Stuart wonders if France is pulling its weight.
Stuart feels we need to get practicing at absorbing and channeling migration. Let's see this as a practice run for what's to come. Practice makes perfect, right?
William points out that France has taken in more migrants than the UK and highlights the lack of legal routes for asylum seekers to enter the country. He believes the real issue isn’t that they’re all coming here but rather that it's the only route they can take, leaving them at the mercy of gangs (like a bad road trip with a shady GPS).
William explains the difference between an asylum seeker and an illegal immigrant and says the issue of small boats crossing the Channel has been blown out of proportion. The number of people crossing the Channel in a year could fit into a football stadium.
Stuart’s action plan? Spend a bit of time thinking about this openly and remember, the media from all angles is trying to convince you of their way of thinking. Just like those salesmen who insist you need a vacuum that also makes smoothies.
Samantha, another listener, this time from Cumbria, England puts forward the second question: “Is there always an alternative explanation?”
Stuart kicks things off with, there's always an alternative. It doesn’t mean it’s correct, but hey, it’s like trying on funky hats—worth exploring! Because stepping outside our perspective is like upgrading from fuzzy logic to sharp clarity.
Stuart then explores the barriers to accepting alternative explanations. It could be ego or the fear of being wrong, or maybe just the dread of finding out pineapple does belong on pizza.
William’s action plan? Check out other sources. It’s like a treasure hunt, except the treasure is the truth and not a dusty old map.
Stuart recommends reading a Maeve Binchy book. She writes from the perspective of people’s shared challenges. Think of it as a literary group therapy session with a dash of charm.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities:change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair:justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/thepeoplescountrysideenvironmentaldebatepodcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
This podcast does not focus on substandard humor, notwithstanding Stuart's belief in the quality of his joke. Rather, it is dedicated to discussions revolving around inquiries submitted by the audience.
Wayne from Bangor, Maine, USA sets the first question - “Any thoughts about recharging and regen in environmental campaigning and in life?”.
Stuart initiates by asserting that maintaining consistent energy levels is more manageable if one avoids allowing the 'battery' to deplete entirely, advocating for sustained replenishment.
William extends this notion, emphasizing the importance of keeping one's 'battery' recharged and exploring diverse methodologies for narrating one's story, rather than presenting it monotonously.
Stuart further elaborates on the significance of not overburdening oneself, particularly with social media engagement. He observes that many individuals incessantly produce content, yet he subscribes to the 'less is more' philosophy.
The second question today comes from Ray, in Sauk Centre, Minnesota, USA - “Many people are looking to get the big questions answered. Many reject mainstream media for alternative media outlets, as they feel the mainstream don’t tell the truth. Why, I ask, should it be assumed that alternative media tells the truth in comparison? I feel unregulated alternative media and narratives can infiltrate and exploit us, and nudge us towards thinking and acting how they want. The far right and the far left twist stories to fire us up. If any of us then get in trouble by being swept along in a tide of emotional reactions, we’re considered collateral damage for someone else's agenda. All forms of media can be vailed recruitment drives, to spread any given perspective”.
William commences by positing that this podcast itself could be considered part of the alternative media, emphasizing that it fosters authentic conversations rather than prescribing beliefs or emotions.
Stuart advocates for engaging with a wide array of sources, especially those with which one may profoundly disagree. He argues that such exploration facilitates a deeper understanding of differing viewpoints and one's own beliefs, thereby promoting intellectual diversity.
William compares news to advertising, suggesting both exert a significant influence on public perception. He poses a fundamental question regarding one's moral compass and intrinsic identity, querying whether individuals rely excessively on external influences to shape their opinions.
Stuart highlights the importance of critically assessing media statements and their potential effects on individuals. William underscores the media's manipulation of emotions, irrespective of political alignment.
In this episode Ed Yong’s book An Immense World is mentioned, here’s a link: edyong.me/an-immense-world
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
In this episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow tackle two thought-provoking listener questions.
The first question, and it is quite a long one, comes from Cedric in Central Region, Malawi - ”Business has a part to play in the ecological and climate crisis, its part of the problem and thus, part of the solution, don’t you think?
Think on this, the climate crisis is a once in a generation opportunity for big business to make money, not lose it. If you frame it like that to the CEO’s etc, they will buy into doing the right thing, even if they don’t give a shit. The top brass are often just motivated by profit, so this brings them along with us. What's coming down the track is every business is going to have to reduce its carbon output, and clients and supply chains could bypass them for more sustainable businesses if they don’t shape up. Some try and avoid putting value on nature, but maybe the idea of value needs reframing too?
When it's done for the right reasons or not, as long as everything is more sustainable, surely that's a good thing? 60% of us say we want to do something to be sustainable, yet barely 20% actually do. Maybe that's to do with people wanting to feel safe in the just transition that has to happen, or scared to do the wrong things. We shouldn’t be scared as that teaches us how to do the right things. We’re all part of the same system, none of us outside of it, so we shouldn’t use energy thinking whether we should exert our influence from the inside or from the outside. We need to bring our influence to bear in all areas of the system. The system isn’t broken, it's doing exactly what it was originally set up to do, make money. The system just needs recodeing as it were, and guess what? There would still be room to make money, though maybe it would be done more fairly?
We are bearing witness to a period of huge change. Is it quick enough though? Who knows, but what I do know, the approach of LESS - BETTER - LOCAL is a clear way forward. We need to differentiate between need and want. 25% of the value of what we buy is the production costs, 75% of its value is what they spend convincing us that we need this crap. The marketeers drive want and don’t always solve a need. Just saying”.
In this discussion, sparked by Cedric's question, Stuart and William explore how businesses can simultaneously contribute to, and solve, environmental challenges, examining companies' motivations for sustainability, consumers' environmental concerns, and the pivotal role of supply chains in driving sustainable practices.
The second question for this episode comes from Aytama in Harjumaa, Estonia - “What’s the true meaning of freedom? Not sure if you’ve talked about this before?”
With this shorter, philosophical question, Stuart and William reflect on whether true freedom exists, and discuss how freedom might better be understood as moments of release or escape, rather than an absolute state.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Welcome to The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, this is how we roll here. Your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbut and William Mankelow discuss questions sent in by listeners all around the world. They don’t see the questions before they press record, making their conversations unique and off the cuff. You dear listener, hear that question at the same time as them.
In today’s episode we find the daring duo (one more daring than the other) discussing questions from the Northern and Southern hemispheres.
The first comes from Bronwen in Atlanta, Georgia, USA:
“Physiologically if humans colonise space, our bodies will alter, meaning we won’t be able to live back on Earth unless there are support systems in place. That evolution could see a new species evolve, and guess what, another opportunity for war. Colonising space could divide humans yet more instead of bringing us together, for the common good”.
Off the back of Bronwen’s question, Stuart and William discuss the physical challenges humans face in space exploration and colonization. William points out how space travel affects human physiology, even during short stays on the International Space Station, and reminds us that humans are still evolving as a species. Stuart highlights the significant threat posed by germs and viruses during space colonization, with William adding a parallel to historical continental colonization where diseases spread to new populations.
During this part of the discussion, Stuart mentioned the Queen track 39, here is a Spotify link if you would like to listen to it: Queen - 39
The second question for this episode comes from the very south of South America where Lucas in Punta Arenas, Chile provides the following question:
“Chile is the second biggest producer of Salmon in the world, after Norway I think. We have huge farms off the coast, with fish crammed together, cover in Lice and spreading infection. Do we really want to be eating that stuff? Once things take on an uncontrolled industrial scale, lots is lost?”
William right from the beginning of the discussion agrees entirely with Lucas’s point of view. Stuart then broadens the discussion by comparing it to how some free-range chickens are still kept in crowded conditions. He describes how farmed salmon are packed into underwater crates and suffer from lice infestations, with William adding that such overcrowding would cause similar problems even in humans.
Stuart ends the conversation with two important points: First, he advises people not to blindly trust food labels and instead research the claims made on packaging. Second, he concludes that people need to stop eating and consuming mindlessly, and should put more thought into their choices rather than taking the easy route.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
In our podcast, we engage in thoughtful discussions based on questions submitted by our listeners. Our aim is to explore these enquiries and steer the conversation towards environmental issues and solutions.
Vinroy, from Linstead, Jamaica asks the initial question - “The global majority are people of colour, so where was the tipping point that saw the white man dominate?”
Stuart initiates the discussion by examining various historical empires, including the French, German, English, Dutch, and Roman empires, noting their use of slavery. He suggests that technological advancements may have contributed to the dominance of white men in history.
William builds on this by pointing out geographical advantages, such as Great Britain's island location. Stuart proposes inviting an academic expert, such as a historian from Oxford University, to delve deeper into the topic. He highlights several tipping points that have led to this dominance.
William brings up the early history of colonization, while Stuart emphasizes the deep historical roots of these developments. Stuart concludes by encouraging listeners to research this topic further.
The next question comes from Felix, in Novi Sad, Serbia - “The installation of disabled access shouldn’t be just about disabled people. It should be about all of us, as when we all get older we all might need these facilities. Thats how to market it. It's not for ‘them’ it's for ‘us all’”.
Stuart kicks off by suggesting, Felix, you've practically answered your own question. Why are we even here?
He then mentions chatting with a bloke from the local council. Apparently, investing in accessibility is like future-proofing yourself. Let's face it, we're all gonna need it when we're old and creaky, right?
William chimes in with, if you show those decision-makers that making things accessible is for everyone, they might actually get off their backsides and do it properly for once.
Stuart suggests an action: Go check out the new disabled access around town. Spoiler alert: it's for all of us.
William's action is a bit of an adventure: Take a stroll with a mate in a wheelchair. See what hurdles they face. If you can't find a friend in a wheelchair, just imagine the fun you'd have navigating your neighborhood with one. It's like an obstacle course—but without the prize.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Thanks for stopping by and wasting your precious time with us. This is the first full episode of 2025, and we’re kicking off the New Year with an explicit bang. Consider yourself warned: Enjoy!
Simon, from Chiselhampton, Oxfordshire, England sets question one - “What do you think of all the banks closing their branches and forcing customers online, and do you think that reflects anything about our approach to living sustainably?”
William’s having a bit of a meltdown because his bank decided that actual branches are a bit too 20th century. Everything’s got to be done online now. He goes on a rant about how some things are just better face to face rather than through a screen. It’s all very dehumanizing, you know.
Stuart, being his usual observant self, tells a story about being in his bank branch and overhearing the manager say, “You can do all this from your bed on your phone. Why even bother getting up and coming here?” Stuart’s pretty sure this is just the bank’s way of making branch closures sound like a brilliant idea.
William tries to argue that closing branches reduces unnecessary journeys to the bank. Stuart isn’t buying it; he thinks people actually want to get out and be part of the community.
The conversation then shifts to the idea of the 15-minute city. Stuart highlights the irony in people thinking it’s both a way to trap us and a reason for local shops to close.
Stuart wraps up with the idea that forcing everything online is just a way to make more money for shareholders by cutting out branches and overheads.
Ashton, in Whitfield, Kent asks the next question - “Having just watched the closing ceremony of the 2024 ParaOlympics, do you really think it will make a difference to society? Is it representation or honest integration we need now? How do you think the competitors dealt with the media, getting the word out there? Do you think merging para events with mainstream ones like at Glasgow 2026 Commonwealth Games is a good idea?”
Stuart watched the Paralympics but feels a bit guilty about not enjoying it. His boredom stemmed from the sheer number of events and categories, all crammed together for TV. It was over in a flash, leaving no time to turn the athletes into recognizable personalities.
Stuart goes on about the impact the Paralympics have on people’s perceptions. He mentions a chat between a Paralympian and a member of the public, who naively thought, “If someone in a wheelchair can go 26 miles, why can’t you get to the shops?” Of course, the obvious answer is that they’re elite athletes, not your average Joe.
Stuart brings up the organization Every Body Moves, which he heard about during the Paralympics. Here’s the link to them: everybodymoves.org.uk/
Stuart wraps up by saying he’d love to hear the athletes' genuine thoughts, not just their media-trained responses. He acknowledges that some athletes shared personal stories that did help push the narrative forward.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
It's the 1st of January 2025, and by some miracle of the calendar, Stuart and William have survived another year to wish you a Happy New Year! Whether you are nursing a hangover or just trying to remember where you put your resolutions, may your year be filled with more laughter and fewer questionable decisions.
Cheers for sticking with us in 2024, and here's to a 2025 that's hopefully just as entertaining, if not slightly less chaotic. Slàinte Mhath!
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Stuart and William, your co-hosts, are that friendly voice in your ear. They guarantee they will be here every week, with a new release every Sunday, at 10am, plus extra material outside of this schedule too. There are no scripts, just genuine conversation between middle aged men.
In today’s episode, the last for 2024, Stuart and William mull over two questions sent in by listeners, with the first coming from Anne in Turlock, California, USA - “When making your podcast, how aware are you that someone will always say you are offensive if they don’t agree with you?”
The discussion off the back of this question begins with William’s assertion that both he and Stuart are aware that they could be offensive with every episode they record together. Stuart comes at it from a different angle though, noting the difference between being offensive and someone taking offence. A person taking offence doesn’t mean he and William are being offensive.
William brings up that often offense is felt when a person has an opposing opinion to you. Stuart follows on from this saying that he always tries to be respectful, but he gets frustrated not hearing certain topics being openly and honestly talked about, which he feels is the contribution that this podcast tries to make.
William goes on to talk about how the conversations Stuart and he have on this podcast is like a stream of consciousness, but he always has in his mind the potential impact of his words, and the motive behind them too. He concludes by giving you an action: Where in your life are you easily offended and why?
They next move onto the second question for this episode which comes from listener Dusan in Lahinch, Ireland - “Do we need to have a strong faith to give a damn and have a sense of identity?”
From this question, both Stuart and William assume that when Dusan refers to faith, they are talking about God, and for William he is categorical that we don’t need faith to have a sense of identity. He states that you are your physical being, nothing more, nothing less.
Stuart pulls him up on this statement. He goes on to talk about how during workshops he leads, he gets participants around a campfire to write down sixteen things about them. He gets them to cross off anything to do with work, anything to do with their physical body, anything to do with their hobbies, and then generally what you're left with is values. He sees that as being their identity.
Stuart and William then go onto discuss whether you need faith to have an identity? William feels that faith can bring structure to your life. He cites a close friend who is an evangelical Christian, and he sees how important their faith is to them, and how big a part it is of their identity.
Stuart’s conclusion: he thinks some people do need a faith to give a damn, but he also thinks it's worth exploring giving a damn without a faith too.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Another Christmas is upon us, so here’s another Christmas Day message from your favourite podcast co-hosts. Wherever you are in the world Stuart and William hope you find a little peace.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
It's the 22nd of December! Ready for Christmas, if you celebrate it? If you don't, hopefully you’ll have a good day on the 25th, whatever you do.
Your co-hosts don't see the questions before they press record. They approach it cold. There are enough experts out there. Stuart and William are just two guys willing to explore the unknown.
The first listener question today is set by Payton, in Philadelphia , USA - “Does pursuing ‘Once In A Lifetime Experiences’ in our individual lives really help counteract the collective impacts of climate change, or is it better to align our collective focuses for the collective good, as we hunt out the opportunities for change?”
Stuart begins by questioning the sustainability of once-in-a-lifetime experiences, suggesting that if they involve high energy consumption, they do little to contribute positively.
William responds by highlighting a scenario where someone flies thousands of miles to witness a unique event, consuming vast resources for a single occasion, which undeniably impacts the environment.
Stuart argues that every moment is technically a once-in-a-lifetime experience, thus reducing the significance of labeling certain events as such. William adds that these experiences are exclusive and personal, like weddings who most see as being unique when they are not.
Stuart emphasizes that genuine once-in-a-lifetime experiences are those that profoundly open one's eyes and are difficult to orchestrate artificially. He expresses a preference for focusing on collective benefits rather than individual, fleeting moments.
Ultimately, Stuart suggests prioritizing actions for the collective good over indulging in once-in-a-lifetime experiences, as this aligns better with addressing the collective impacts of climate change.
Hobbs, from Florida, in the USA offers up today's second question - “I’m sending this question just as the Paris Olympics is ending. What were your takes on it?”
William reported minimal engagement with the 2024 Olympics from him, being only marginally aware of the event's occurrence.
In contrast, Stuart shared his experience of viewing the 2024 Olympics, acknowledging a personal perception of the event as contrived and less authentic compared to past games. Stuart conveyed significant annoyance with the event, expressing relief upon its conclusion.
The discussion between Stuart and William then shifted to the environmental implications of hosting the Olympics. William highlighted the environmental impact resulting from the influx of spectators and participants traveling long distances.
Stuart posed a critical question regarding the sustainability of hosting the Olympic Games, does the environmental cost justify the event?
William echoed this sentiment by questioning the overall worth of the Games in light of their environmental footprint.
Stuart further questioned the motivations behind hosting such large-scale events, probing the authenticity of audience reactions and considering whether they are genuinely individual responses or influenced by societal pressures.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: Petition Link
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: Just Giving Link
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends Podcast Link , support our work through Patreon Patreon Link. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Welcome to The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow, over the last few years have been discussing questions sent in by listeners. No scripts, no prep, just genuine opinions.
In today’s episode we have two questions, both originating from Central America.
The first question up for discussion is from Yenifer in Provincia De Panamá, Panama:
“The illusion of wealth seems to be fooling many of us. Big houses, fancy cars, designers, a fancy lifestyle isn’t wealth in my view, it's debt. Wealth to me is time, freedom, options and health”.
The conversation kicks off with William and Stuart reflecting on Yenifer’s question about the deceptive nature of material wealth, challenging the common association between luxury possessions and true prosperity.
The discussion takes an intriguing philosophical turn as Stuart explores the concept of freedom as a state of mind, independent of physical circumstances. William builds on this by examining how society's fixation on financial success often overshadows other crucial forms of wealth, such as time and personal freedom.
Together, the hosts dissect the subtle difference between illusion and delusion when it comes to wealth, with Stuart posing the thought-provoking question of whether our collective belief in money as a measure of success is more than just an illusion.
The second question for this episode comes from Xiomara in Managua Department, Nicaragua:
“What is the true consequence of humans destroying themselves and making themselves extinct?”
This conversation begins with William's stark observation about the planets indifference to human existence, setting the tone for a fascinating discussion about mortality on a species-wide scale.
Stuart offers a thought-provoking perspective on human extinction, pointing out that we won't be around to witness its consequences, though he acknowledges the potential trauma for those who might experience humanity's final chapter. Building on this, William explores the evolutionary timeline, explaining that even if humanity survives far into the future, we would inevitably evolve into something entirely different within a billion years.
The hosts contemplate how nature would ultimately fill the void left by humanity's departure, leading to Stuart's memorably colorful conclusion that humanity's legacy might be little more than "a skid mark on the arse of life".
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Welcome to another insightful episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, your hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow guarantee the following: no plan, no prep, no research, no scripts, just off the cuff explorations. There are enough experts out there, Stuart and William don’t try to add to their ranks.
Once again they discuss two questions sent by listeners. The first comes in from Rithipol from Phnom Penh, Cambodia, their question is as follows:
“Hi guys. You both say neither of you have a uni education, yet you often say the education system isn’t as good as we think it is. Those who have been through higher education, going through it, or going to be going through it, will likely largely argue with you, as they may feel they have more knowledge and experience than you. What qualifications do you have to argue and criticise, or is it based on life experience or solid research on your part?”
During the discussion of Rithipol’s question, Stuart argues that the education system functions as a conveyor belt, designed to prepare and potentially indoctrinate people for the work place. While he acknowledges that education has some value, he believes many university courses exist primarily to generate revenue, and challenges the notion that formal qualifications are necessary to critique the system.
William shares his personal experience of being overlooked in school, falling between the categories of high achievers and troublemakers. Despite this, he recognizes education's power to help people make sense of the world.
Both discuss how self-education doesn't fit conventional structures, with Stuart questioning academic standards for things like essay writing. They acknowledge they're speaking from different perspectives, with Stuart suggesting that those invested in traditional education might struggle to question its value, as doing so would force them to confront potentially uncomfortable truths about their choices.
The second question arrives on the X2 bus from the town of Didcot, Oxfordshire, England, from long time question provider Debs:
“As co hosts you often say the rich are made rich through the poor working hard for them. Why shouldn’t business owners get rich off the backs of the workers? The owners are the ones taking the risk after all”.
While chewing over Debs’s question, William opens the conversation by noting that risk in business isn't solely on owners - workers also take risks.
Stuart believes making a real difference requires leading your own projects, but William counters that there's value in simply living a good, non-exploitative life, without grand ambitions. William also advocates for better wage equality, and acknowledges employee risks.
Stuart concludes that truly impactful work requires independence, as working under others inevitably comes with limitations that restrict one's ability to create meaningful change.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friendspodfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast , support our work through Patreonpatreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Welcome to our podcast, where we tackle life's inconvenient truths and remind you that, like it or not, we're all part of nature's mess. Think of it as a therapy session with no preparation, no forewarning, and no escape. Stuart and William don't see the questions before we hit record, so they approach them as clueless as you are when you press play.
Get comfortable—or uncomfortable—and join us in this delightful chaos.
Rithipol, a listener from Phnom Penh, Cambodia has set the first question for Stuart and William to explore - See Rithipol’s question here.
William kicks things off with a cheery note about evolution—basically, we’re not going to be around in a billion years. We’re constantly evolving, and let’s not forget those regular other cataclysmic events that keep life interesting.
Stuart jumps in, suggesting that to ensure our species’ survival, we’ll need to be sprinting around the universe anyway, dodging the ever-changing cosmic chaos. So we shouldn’t worry too much about the Andromeda galaxy crashing into the Milky Way and messing up planetary orbits.
William, ever the optimist, points out that there’s plenty of room in space. He even throws in a fun fact: if you lined up all the planets in our solar system, they’d fit neatly between the Earth and the Moon. Comforting, right?
Then Stuart, the realist, mentions that even if we do manage to colonise space, we’ll probably just end up with the same old tribalism. History repeating itself on a cosmic scale.
William finishes by looping back to evolution, speculating that if we settled on Mars, in a few thousand years we’d have a whole new species. And of course, more tribal squabbles, but this time between different species.
Hortencia, Humacao, Puerto Rico set the second question. See Hortencia’s question here.
Stuart and William kick off by moaning about why it’s so hard for people to change their diets.
William reckons it’s because we’re not exposed to different foods when we're young, and as we get older, we get more fussy—like some sort of culinary agoraphobia.
Stuart jumps in, banging on about how expensive it is to eat sustainably. And let’s not forget the peer pressure—because heaven forbid you eat a salad while your mates are munching on burgers.
William points out how vegans are stereotyped, as if they’re all part of some tofu cult.
Stuart’s got the idea that it’ll take a lot of different tactics to get people to change their eating habits on a large scale.
Then they have a natter about how people often mistake thirst for hunger, and how some folks they know wouldn’t touch “foreign rubbish” with a ten-foot pole.
William’s advice? Just give something new a try and see if you don’t hate it.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Ready to swap your Netflix binge for a breath of fresh air? Then grab a cup of tea and settle in as Stuart and William chat about their workshops, guided walks, and all sorts of nature-based shenanigans.
Whether it’s just you and your mate, a group of pals, or you’re planning a stag or hen do that’s a bit more country stroll than city crawl, they’ve got you covered. Even the corporate lot trying to swap stress for a bit of team-building in the great outdoors—you’re welcome too.
Full-day, half-day, and even quick two-hour jaunts. Perfect for those who’ve been living life like a hermit crab in a car, home, or office. Get out there, reconnect with nature, and remember what it’s like to have grass under your feet instead of carpet.
So, give yourself permission to enjoy nature, have a giggle, and maybe learn a thing or two.
Now, who’s bringing the sandwiches and blindfolds?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Welcome back, dear listener, to yet another episode where we break away from what we usually do. Of course, if you can tell us what our style actually is, we’d be forever grateful—and frankly, a little astonished.
In this delightfully short episode, we plead with you, our dearest listener, to spread the word about this podcast to five of your closest companions. The ones who'd still hug you even if you’ve been sick down the front of your shirt.
Your efforts in spreading the word will earn our undying gratitude and possibly a new set of friends. What do you say, ready to embark on this charade with us?
Remember, your support is the peanut butter to our jelly, the Groucho to our Marx. Thanks for listening, and spreading the nonsense!
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Welcome to the crazy train that’s the People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. There are no scripts here, Stuart and William are not experts either, they’re just two people willing to discuss the big issues, in an open and honest way.
In today’s episode they explore two listener questions. One is from Xiomara, Managua Department, Nicaragua and the second from Maidali, Nacional, Dominican Republic.
Xiomara’s question is as follows: “What can we do to address the discrimination faced by people with disabilities?”
William, straight off the bat, encourages everyone to stop seeing the individual as a person with disabilities, and actually just see them as the person that's there in front of you. Stuart takes this a step further, saying that you are only as disabled as society enables you to be.
They both go on to the discuss the positives of combining the Olympics and Paralympics into one event, that it may mean less competitors, but it would potentially be more inclusive.
They also delve into the subject of where discrimination comes from? Is it unconscious patronization, or unnecessary sympathy for a person with a disability?
William concludes this discussion by pointing out when you see somebody in a wheelchair, you see somebody with a white stick, or you see somebody who obviously has some form of disability. Don't automatically assume that this person is going to fit into a neat pigeonhole box for you. Instead, have genuine interest and empathy for the people around you.
Stuart concludes: keep talking about this stuff. If it's uncomfortable, then you're actually talking about something with substance. If the conversation is nice and comfortable, you’re maybe not pushing the boundaries enough.
Onto the second question, which comes from Maidali: “Pilotless Aircraft seem to be where you are heading. Would you guys feel safe not having a manual override?”
William has only heard of the idea of pilotless aircraft as a concept, and even though a lot of flying is handled by the computer, autopilot, he sees that a pilot as a human element will always be needed in the cockpit.
Stuart brings up the idea of driverless cars, buses, trains, so why not aircraft too? William counters this question as he himself sees driverless cars as being purely science fiction, and the only place they would work is in closed areas.
Stuart concludes this episode with two actions, one for both questions, the first is: have an internal conversation with yourself to see if you recognize you're discriminating. The second action encourages you to ask yourself the question: would you feel unsafe having driverless services, transport or otherwise?
William’s action: ask yourself what do you habitually do in your life and ask yourself the question. Does that really serve your needs and your life?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
What we can promise you with this podcast is a complete lack of planning, zero preparation, and absolutely no research. Scripts? Never heard of them. Everything is straight from the hip. Stuart is a full-time ninja of environmental social justice. He doesn’t parade around with signs, but he stealthily champions the cause from the shadows. He alongside William your other co-host are just two dudes ready to dive into the big topics set by listeners with no forethought whatsoever.
Sigurdur, from the Capital Region, Iceland sets the initial question - “What can we do to address the lack of representation and diversity in the arts?”
Stuart kicks things off with “Is there a lack of representation and diversity in the arts?” He then muses about how art naturally attracts what society calls the “eccentric bunch.”
Stuart, ever the diplomat, sees both sides of the representation coin. It can be a mighty force, but sometimes it feels as genuine as a three-pound note.
William, not to be outdone, chimes in about trailblazers – those rare gems who are unapologetically themselves, inspiring others without even trying. He’s a firm believer in the mantra: “You’ve got to see it to be it.”
William then reminisces about the good old days, noting that there’s more diversity in the arts now than in the 1990s, when music was as diverse as a beige wallpaper.
He also points out that people often gravitate towards the familiar and comforting, rather than the challenging and new. But then, with a flourish, William suggests an action plan: “Go out and find something a bit off the beaten track. It might just change your life and make you see the world – and your walk down the street – in a whole new light.”
Hortencia, from Humacao, Puerto Rico then asks the second question- “How can we challenge beauty standards and promote body positivity?”
William kicks things off by saying, “Love your body, folks! It’s what you live in every day”. You wouldn’t slag off your house, would you?
He then dives into the topic of fat shaming, pointing out that everyone’s got an opinion on how someone else looks. “It’s like, ‘Oh, she’s too thin,’ or ‘He’s too fat.’ Just let people be!”
Stuart jumps in, questioning why people are so bothered about others’ appearances. He reckons it ties back to Sigurdur’s earlier point: people should just get on with their own lives.
Stuart then suggests a bold approach: More people should adopt a bit of ‘sod it’ and just get out there!
William talks about how communities can support everyone by accepting differences. It’s like a big family – we all have that one weird uncle, but we still love him.
The conversation then shifts to ideals about hair colour, body size, and more. Stuart and William agree that we often focus on differences, but what really matters is the connection between you and the person you’re chatting with. It’s not about age or ethnicity; it’s about the distance between you and the person you’re having a natter with.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends, support our work through Patreon . Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link.
Once again breaking from the more usual style of output for this podcast, today Stuart and William, your co-hosts, discuss how their collaborative talks away from this podcast have evolved.
More details here https://speakernet.co.uk/speaker/149/stuart-mabbutt
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
In this thought-provoking episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow tackle two pressing questions from listeners, about food labelling and the cost of helping combat the climate and ecological emergencies.
Whether you're curious about the future of food labelling, or seeking budget-friendly ways to combat climate change, this episode promises to inform, inspire, and perhaps even challenge your thinking about our role in preserving the planet.
Join us then, for an unscripted, relatable conversation that reminds us we're all part of the natural world, not separate from it.
Today’s journey begins with a question from Milica in Podgorica, Montenegro, who asks: "Why has so much changed in food labelling for personal health but not planet health?"
Stuart and William unpack this thought-provoking query, examining the current state of food labelling and its effectiveness in influencing consumer behaviour. They draw parallels with cigarette warning labels and discuss the potential impact of similar approaches for environmental concerns. The hosts also explore the challenges of standardising planet health labels and propose innovative solutions, including a utopian vision where suppliers take the lead in sustainable practices.
The conversation then shifts to a question from Senna in Kidlington, Oxford:
"What if I can't afford to change my way of life but still want to help combat the climate and ecological emergencies?"
Stuart and William offer practical, cost-free strategies for making a positive environmental impact. They emphasise the power of mindful decision-making and challenge listeners to reconsider their assumptions about the cost of eco-friendly living.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Stuart and William are today marking the International Day for Rural Women 2024, with this bonus episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
Rural women account for about 22% of the global population. They play an important role in the health and wellbeing of their communities. Rural women can face challenges like higher rates of poverty (as both extreme and multidimensional poverty are higher in rural areas globally), as well as unequal access to education, health and other social services, and employment opportunities. Rural women can also experience gender inequality resulting from discriminatory social institutions, formal and informal laws, social norms and practices. Challenges can be even greater for rural Indigenous women and girls.
You can find out more about this day with the following link: https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2024/10/15/default-calendar/international-day-for-rural-women
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Once again breaking from the more usual style of output for this podcast, today Stuart and William, your co-hosts, discuss the benefits to you the listeners for supporting us on our Patreon page, that can be found here: https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you’d like us to discuss?
Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast’s overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Breaking from the more usual style of output for this podcast, if there is one, as its always evolving. We draw your attention to a fundraiser and a petition that’s currently running.
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair:
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all- disabilities-and-abilities
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you’d like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast’s overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
In this thought-provoking episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William, dive into two compelling listener questions, that challenge societal norms and perceptions. Today’s questions both come from the UK, with Senna in Kidlington, Oxfordshire, and Ashton in Whitfield in Kent contributing.
First, they tackle Senna's inquiry, about the paradox of racism, and that question is as follows:
“The world is still full of racism, often directed at the colour of someone's skin. Yet as it got warmer this summer, I was seeing more and more white people sunbathing, trying to get a tan, and darkening their skins, maybe even trying to look more like those that have racism thrown at them.
Doesn't this show the shallowness of our collective society and that racism doesn't have solid foundations?”
Stuart and William explore the motivations behind this trend, discussing the societal pressures that lead people to desire what they do not naturally possess. They reflect on the implications of tanning salons, and the contrasting practices of skin bleaching across cultures, ultimately advocating for self-acceptance, and the importance of open dialogue with those who hold prejudiced views.
Stuart and William then go onto to discuss the following question from Ashton:
“Can we adapt to climate change instead of fighting it?”
This question prompts a discussion between the co-hosts on climate change adaptation versus resistance. Stuart suggests that we are already adapting to climate realities, while William critiques our short-term mindset, and lack of intergenerational thinking. Together, they question why collective action remains elusive in the face of such pressing challenges.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Welcome to the People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where you’ll hear questions sent in from listeners from all around the globe. The main themes that run through each of them are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Join Stuart and Willam, your co-hosts, who are like two men sitting in a pub, given an envelope with the question in, which they open up and explore, cold, without having prepared, very much like you, more likely than not, sitting there listening to this episode. The unprepared nature of this podcast ensures genuine thoughts and reactions for you to ponder.
The first question today comes from Milica in Podgorica, Montenegro. It's quite lengthy, so we've copied it into a Google Doc for reference: Milicia’s Question
William views self-discipline as an internal process. He believes it’s largely self-taught and starts from within your own mind before considering external factors.
Stuart adds that a Buddhist perspective would suggest that by looking within, you can find the answers. From this viewpoint, there are no inherently good or bad environments; it's all about your mindset.
William points out that many people spend their time working, or mindlessly scrolling through social media. This is a passive activity that merely provides a dopamine hit, while reading actively engages the brain and can even help combat Alzheimer's and Dementia.
William’s action: If you're sitting there thinking, I've not read, I've never picked up a book, and I'm not going to sit and read, for example, ‘War and Peace’. Don't! Read what you want to read, look for something that really interests you.
Stuart and William then discuss how we handle stressful situations as indicators of personal growth. Certain situations that once caused stress may no longer affect us, while some still do. Staying calm in stressful circumstances is a sign of progress.
Stuart brings up an action: be aware of any conditioning you’ve had in your life. Be aware of it, and then you can act, if you wish to. He thinks the word acceptance comes into his mind here. If you learn to accept, not just maintaining the status quo, just accepting how things are. And then saying, okay, now I've got that awareness, how can I change things?
The second question of today’s episode has been set by Ashton from Whitfield, Kent, England. Their question is as follows:
“Do you ever see a time when fuel will be the universal currency?”
Stuart asserts right away, that he believes fuel is already functioning as a currency in many ways.
William counters that while fuel may not be a currency per se, it certainly plays a significant role in driving the world forward.
Stuart’s action for this topic: Seek out new opportunities, related to alternative fuels—there's much to explore in this evolving landscape!
Thank you for joining us today! We hope these discussions inspire you to reflect on your own experiences and actions.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
In this podcast, we strive to uncover and discuss pressing issues, and today’s episode is no exception. As we conclude this series, we once again deviate from our usual format to address the final question posed during the 2023 Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, held at The Bothy Vineyard, which was a live incarnation of this podcast in front of a real life audience.
That day Lyn asked - “What can you do to help stop the 100 million gallon/4 and a half mile diameter reservoir that is being proposed here on our doorstep? (South Oxfordshire, England) The destruction to the environment will be irreversible. Water transfer is a far better way, cheaper and less destructive.”
Recently, during a talk they gave in Wroughton, Wiltshire, Stuart and William were informed by an audience member that permission had already been granted for the construction of a new reservoir. This news was unexpected for both Stuart and William, despite discussions about this reservoir spanning over three decades. The proposed reservoir aims to supply water to London. They took this news as hearsay.
Stuart elaborates on the potential physical impact of this reservoir, drawing parallels with the Audenshaw Reservoir in Manchester. William adds that the reservoirs near Heathrow are comparable.
In addressing the question of how to oppose such a proposal, Stuart emphasises the importance of a cohesive strategy, community engagement, and persistent advocacy. He notes that water companies often adopt long-term strategies, but encourages continued resistance and the exploration of alternative solutions to meet water needs. He highlights significant changes in water availability in Oxfordshire.
Stuart stresses the need to improve our water consumption habits, pointing out that the construction of reservoirs is more complex than simply damming a river. He advises creative and informed disruptive actions, such as thoroughly understanding the plan and its potential impacts.
William revisits the concept of NIMBYism, linking it to our resistance to change and the necessity of reconsidering our water consumption and wastage habits.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Another question today from an audience member at the live iteration of this podcast, at Bothy Vineyard, back in May 2023.
Someone who handed in a slip as anonymous, asked “Many of our global problems stem from out-of-control population growth. What can we do about this? Discuss!”
Stuart, one of the cohosts of this podcast, raises that there is an assumption within the question, and argues that we grow enough food already to feed us all, but there are many issues stopping that food being fairly distributed to everyone.
He also feels that there currently isn’t much we can do to change our course with overconsumption and wastage. One solution he does offer though, is that we can try and get away from the rights of passage habits in life, and that we should all try and get away from, for example having children, if we don’t really want them.
Stuart also brings up that a major virus could also put a stop to our population getting out of hand, and comes up with an action: Question what you are doing, and why you are doing it, how you are doing it, and who you are doing it for?.
William, your other co-host, brings up rampant consumerism again. That we can get what we want, when we want it, is another of the big issues. We need to stop craving bigger and bigger things. The population doesn’t make a difference, we just need to live better, more sustainably.
William’s action is to slow down and stop buying new things for the sake of it.
In this episode William’s other podcast that he costs is mentioned, Have You Ever Considered? Link https://zencastr.com/Have-You-Ever-Considered
On the 15th September, William alongside Tommy Serafinski will be co-hosting an online salon with Interinterlect where they will be asking the question: Should we consume less news & media?
You can book your ticket today with the following link:
https://interintellect.com/salon/reclaiming-your-time-and-sanity-the-case-for-minimal-media-consumption/
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
With insights on the inevitability of change, and the importance of finding joy in our surroundings, this episode encourages listeners to rethink their connection to the countryside. Why should those who rarely venture outdoors care about environmental issues?
Welcome to The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate podcast, where your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow are often discussing questions sent in by listeners.
However in a break from the norm, and to give you an opportunity to get your question in for them to discuss, they instead are exploring one of the unused questions that was set during the Environmental Live & Unscripted (the live iteration of this podcast) that was in May 2023 in the setting of the Bothy Vineyard, Oxfordshire.
The question set by Julian, a member of the audience, is as follows:
“If we have effective policies that result in less meat & dairy - the Great British heritage lobby will say that we’ll be throwing away the British countryside - how it looks. How do we involve the public thinking about the future countryside that they want and also helps save the planet?”
During this discussion Stuart explores the notion of maintaining protected nature reserves—should we preserve them, as they were, as they are, or as we envision them to be in the future? He emphasises the importance of a balanced approach, and the power of a strong, supported transition in environmental stewardship. William adds to the conversation by reminding us that the British landscape is largely a human creation, prompting us to consider how we might reshape it once more.
As the duo navigate the challenges of changing public habits and perceptions, they delve into the deeper question of, our resistance to change. Could our reluctance to embrace new ideas be tied to our fear of mortality? Stuart and William reflect on how our life spans influence our views, and how we can cultivate a clearer vision for the future of our environment.
Join us for an engaging discussion that challenges your perceptions and inspires action in these challenging times.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
In this episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow tackle a thought-provoking question from the 2023 live incarnation of this podcast, Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, which was set at the Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire, England.
Sylvia, an audience member, raised the following question: “This is a question about diversity - human diversity - I notice all the speakers today are men and all the audience are white. How can we get the environment discussed by a wider audience?”
Stuart and William dive deep into this crucial topic, exploring ways to make environmental conversations more inclusive and accessible to a wider audience. The hosts reflect on the challenges they faced in diversifying their panel and audience for the live event. They discuss the importance of bringing environmental debates to spaces where a diverse range of people and underrepresented groups feel comfortable, rather than expecting them to come to unfamiliar settings.
Stuart and William examine various barriers that prevent people from attending environmental events and offer insights on how to overcome these obstacles. They emphasise their role as facilitators and the need to actively reach out to diverse communities.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
In a break from our normal output, we’re tackling an unanswered question set by an audience member at a live incarnation of this podcast back in May 2023, Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted. Back then the in-person audience at The Bothy Vineyard event set us a range of questions to discuss.
This one was left anonymously and read - “Animal welfare in meat production is a good concern but Jacque Cousteau said “who cares about the death throes of a fish?”
William broaches the broader implications of trawler fishing, emphasising the discourse encompasses the entirety of animal welfare, extending beyond the act of fishing itself.
Stuart reveals the grim realities of trawler fishing, where countless fish meet their demise through suffocation within the nets or endure a chilling fate upon the deck. Such practices cast a shadow of inhumanity over the industry.
In a reflective chat, Stuart and William reminisce about William’s childhood angling experiences. They deliberate on the optimal methods to acquaint oneself with the aquatic inhabitants of rivers. William conveys a retrospective wish for a more compassionate approach to learning about fish, a realisation that eluded him in his youth. He affirms his family’s longstanding commitment to minimising their ecological footprint.
Stuart contemplates the paradox of nature’s predation, often shunned on television screens, yet an intrinsic element of life. He advocates for a conscious acknowledgment of our predatory role in fishing and urges a thorough consideration of the welfare of the animals we consume, aspiring to the pinnacle of quality in our dietary choices.
Expanding upon this, William points out the prevalent focus on mass production in the meat industry, often at the expense of quality. Stuart contends that a holistic understanding is imperative, one that encompasses the entire spectrum of our food production and consumption practices.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheel
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
In the context of the podcast medium, it is noteworthy that the co-hosts, Stuart and William, do not preview listener-submitted inquiries prior to the commencement of recording. This practice ensures that their responses remain unpremeditated and genuine, thereby preserving the spontaneity and authenticity of their commentary.
So the first listener question is from Teresita, Montevideo, Uruguay - “The Internet isn’t good here sometimes but listen to your new releases on the day you go live when I can. When were the “good old days,” and what were they like for minorities in your country?”
The notion of “good old days” is often subject to critical analysis. William suggests that this concept typically aligns with one’s childhood, a period characterised by a lack of awareness of global events.
Conversely, Stuart immediately contests the existence of any universally “good old days,” highlighting the historical marginalisation of minority groups. He articulates that the journey towards amplifying marginalised voices is ongoing and fraught with challenges.
Stuart and William also touch upon the emergence of new identity categories, reflecting a societal trend towards valuing individuality and uniqueness. They ultimately advocate for an individual-centric approach to identity.
Regarding the query posed by Teresita, both Stuart and William acknowledge their limitations in providing a comprehensive response, given that neither identifies as part of a minority group.
Bea, from Cornwall, England sets the second question today - “House’s are now seen as assets, not as homes, which is contributing to our unequal society in the UK, especially here in the far south west. Left unchecked this would run and run and really undermine us. The poor are partly kept poor as they seem to work to keep the rich rich. Any thoughts?”
Stuart, ever the real estate romantic, believes houses are more than just assets—they’re the stage for our personal soap operas. He’s spotted a trend in the South West: it’s not just the pasties that are hot, but the property prices too, thanks to the ‘seasonal seasoning’ of the area.
Meanwhile, William is all for a population shuffle. He’s convinced that if we all just moved around a bit more, we’d find the perfect balance—like a game of musical chairs, but with postcodes.
Stuart’s having an existential moment, pondering how to stop treating houses like giant piggy banks. He’s asking deep questions, like ‘Do you see your home as a sanctuary or a stock option?’ He’s also reminding us that in the grand game of Monopoly, sometimes life flips the board.
William’s expanding the asset universe, suggesting we gaze at our dwellings as homes first, investment portfolios second. He’s also musing on society’s pecking order, hinting that breaking free from the family fortune—or misfortune—requires a zen-like approach to life. Just live, he says, and maybe don’t count the bedrooms.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://bit.ly/3UmtDyr. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Stuart and William are today marking the International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples 2024, with this bonus episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
They ask you to think about what an indigenous person is to you, and whether or not you see yourself as indigenous. Also, they encourage you to always see the person in front of you for who they are, and to keep away from lazy stereotyping, which can easily form barriers. It's hard to demonise someone whom you’ve taken a step towards, whom you’ve gotten to know, and now see as a more complete person whom you are more connected to.
You can find out more about this day though the following website: International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Join your co-hosts of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, as they delve into two thought-provoking discussions on stereotypes and superiority, which as always were sparked by questions that listeners have sent in.
The first question they delve into is from Yahya, Casablanca-Settat, Morocco - “How do society’s stereotypes influence you personally?”
During their discussions they explore the pervasive influence of stereotypes in our daily lives. Stuart emphasises the constant effort required to overcome these preconceived notions, while acknowledging their role in providing predictability, in certain situations.
William examines character stereotypes in politics, particularly focusing on right-wing portrayals of immigrants, and discusses how easily anyone can fall into stereotyping people. The hosts then engage in a candid conversation about the most damaging stereotypes in the United Kingdom.
The second question they discuss is from Milica, Podgorica, Montenegro - “As you don’t have too many more listener questions lined up, I thought I’d send one in. Who are you superior to yourselves do you think?”
Stuart kicks off the second part of the discussion by playfully claiming superiority over William, while William shares his focus on bettering himself, and only uses the comparison of his past self. Stuart elaborates on feeling superior in specific contexts and activities, without considering himself generally superior to others.
As the episode concludes, Stuart and William pose a thought-provoking question that ties the discussion back to environmental concerns: "Do you see yourself as being superior to nature?"
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Gaby, from Departamento De Santa Cruz, in Bolivia is the lucky listener to set the first of today's questions for your co-host Stuart and William to discuss - “Does the industrial revolution show humanity is punching above its own weight within its own evolution, and causing its own demise?”
William’s there, right on this one, and he’s banging on about how the Industrial Revolution’s still going strong. “We’re basically the same as we were 20,000 years ago,” he says, but now we’ve got light bulbs and Wi-Fi. He reckons though we’re all headed for a big ol’ disaster eventually.
So, Stuart and William get into it about when this Industrial Revolution malarkey actually kicked off. Stuart feels it’s like someone hit fast-forward on the world. We’re zooming ahead quicker than we can evolve! No wonder we don’t have a clue what we’re doing half the time.
Then Stuart gets all deep and meaningful. “Look at your life,” he says. See where you’re punching above your weight, where you’re losing the plot, and where you’re actually on top of things. Once you clock onto that, you can start sorting yourself out. The real trick is knowing that you know, you know? The ultimate awareness is being aware that you are aware.
Simon, from Chiselhampton, in Oxfordshire, England, sets the second listener question - “We hear in Oxford there’s a shortage of allotments sites and space for individuals to grow their own crops, especially as new houses are built with smaller gardens. Do you think this is the case or is there plenty of space to grow?”
William notes that the concept of allotments, which gained fresh prominence during the Second World War, remains relevant today. Stuart highlights the potential for guerrilla gardening, also emphasising the plight of elderly community members who, due to physical limitations, can no longer tend to their overgrown gardens. This neglect often leads to feelings of depression and isolation.
Conversely, the younger generation frequently faces challenges such as limited garden space or poor soil quality, as modern construction often disregards the importance of fertile soil. Builders often see soil as ‘dirt’ not a living ecosystem. Some youngsters may not have access to a garden at all. Stuart advocates for a community-oriented approach, suggesting that individuals reach out to their neighbours. By offering to cultivate vegetables in their gardens, which can help maintain the space and provide companionship to the garden owners. While there is a shortage of official allotment spaces, there is no lack of potential gardening areas within most communities if we reimagine the whole concept.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Yenifer, from Provincia De Panamá, Panama is the lucky listener setting out the first question for discussion today - “Are we brainwashed into thinking working hard gets us wherever we want? Is that just a form of enslavement? If we were taught to have a mindset of working smarter, would that impact those trying to keep us in our seats? We’re told to get educated, get better jobs, work harder, yet the hours get longer for little reward”.
William posits that the essence of productivity lies in working smarter—an approach that inherently encapsulates working harder by virtue of focused and efficient energy utilisation.
Stuart, on the other hand, scrutinises the very notion of hard work, likening it to a form of modern servitude. He argues that the affluent are not the ones toiling; rather, they orchestrate the labour of others. Stuart advocates for self-employment as the epitome of working smartly, challenging the conventional wisdom that equates hard work with success. He contends that employment can sometimes stifle one’s creative vitality.
In their dialogue, Stuart and William explore the dynamics of labour and intellect. They deliberate on the distribution of one’s vigour throughout the day and confront the prevailing workplace culture that often expects employees to render uncompensated overtime.
William’s resolution is a commitment to discovering methods to enhance efficiency without necessarily increasing effort.
Stuart’s resolution is a call to break free from habitual conformity, urging a re-evaluation of one’s work patterns.
Abid, Jendouba Governorate, Tunisia sets the second question today - “Should we be focusing on making the world seas and oceans drinkable as a way of counteracting the climate crisis? Empires have been built of lesser concepts. Will that be the next of Earth's assets humanity fights over?”
William expresses that the desalination of seawater, while a technological marvel, is an endeavour marked by high energy consumption. He advocates for a more judicious use of existing freshwater reserves as an alternative.
Stuart expands by suggesting the extensive use of water in industrial processes such as the production of cement and concrete, as well as in agricultural practices like cattle rearing, locks water away in the processes. He posits that water is poised to become a contentious asset, a catalyst for conflict among human societies. Stuart suggests that the oceans and seas may hold the keys to addressing the climate crisis. However, he cautions that even with advancements rendering desalination more sustainable, the presence of microplastics remains a significant concern.
The conversation between William and Stuart underscores the complexity of water management in the context of environmental sustainability and industrial demands. It reflects a broader conversation about the balance between technological progress and ecological stewardship.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Today, we’re again taking a break from our usual format, to give more time and to encourage you, our valued listeners, to send in more questions, for us to explore in future episodes.
In this episode, we discuss a question set by an attendee of last year’s iteration of Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, the live incarnation of this podcast. This was a ticketed event, unrecorded, and held in front of a live audience.
During the interval of this event we asked attendees to set questions for the panel to discuss in the second half. However, due to the number submitted, we didn’t get around to discussing them all, so we are now slowly working our way through those questions.
The question discussed in today’s episode was set by Daryl, and is as follows:
“Given human population growth and consumerism is so impactful, should we think about a 1 child policy, like China did, and build our population through immigration?”
William discusses the significant environmental impact of having children, due to the resources required to raise them. Stuart notes that only dictatorships can enforce a one-child policy and points out that some places prefer male children. Stuart believes we produce enough food to feed the world, but much of it is used to feed livestock instead of humans, and this livestock feeds a small percentage of us. The conversation then shifts to immigration and the barriers that are often put up.
William then brings up advancements in medical science and crop production as drivers of population growth and questions the practicality of enforcing a one-child policy. Stuart brings up the subject of the societal belief of the right to have children and suggests questioning these traditional rites of passage activities. William raises the societal expectation of marriage and children, and Stuart responds by saying it’s okay to choose a different path.
The discussion touches on the movement of people and the idea that all humans can trace their ancestry back to two women, highlighting our common heritage.
Stuart suggests an action: reflect on your own behaviour, views, and habits regarding family building and rites of passage.
William’s action is to see yourself as the sum of your parts and consider the many people we have all descended from.
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Today, we're taking a break from our usual format, to give more time and to encourage you, our valued listeners, to send in more questions for us to explore in future episodes.
In this special episode, we revisit a thought-provoking question posed by Peter T. during our Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event in May 2023. This was the ticketed second live iteration of this podcast, in front of an audience. Peter T. asked, "If any human activity is practiced by the majority of people, doesn’t it automatically become unsustainable?"
Join Stuart and William as they dive deep into this complex question, examining it from various angles. Stuart begins by asserting that the question is rooted in environmental concerns, specifically focusing on sustainability. He believes that the answer isn't a straightforward yes or no. For instance, if everyone chose to walk instead of drive, this wouldn’t necessarily be environmentally sustainable. Stuart also emphasises that not all widespread activities are inherently detrimental to the environment either.
William adds another layer to the discussion, pondering whether the question implies that the sheer volume of participants in any activity could lead to negative environmental impacts. Both hosts agree that rarely is anything categorical in our world, and nuances are crucial.
Stuart also reflects on the origin of Peter’s question, suggesting it might stem from a perception that environmentalists want everyone to conform to a single way of living.
Listen in for a compelling conversation that challenges the way we think about our everyday actions and their environmental implications. Don’t forget to send in your questions for future episodes!
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not just after numbers.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Join your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow as they tackle two thought-provoking questions sent in by listeners in this engaging episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
Recorded in Stuart's garden, the duo dive into two intriguing queries that challenge perceptions of nature, society, and personal growth.
The first question they tackle is an epic one from Debs in Didcot, Oxfordshire, England, which is as follows:
“Humans, at the core, are selfish beings, as proved by many of us willingly locking down during the Covid pandemic, because we wanted to protect ourselves, our loved ones, and our communities. Was nature considered in that? Biodiversity is often lost in many societies and cultures. How on earth do we put it back, or insert it afresh?
At the Oxfordshire RSPB Otmoor nature reserve, Marsh Harriers bred for the first time four years ago, and I note there is a pub of the same name in Oxford. The RSPB could have purchased everyone in there a drink to celebrate, but they didn’t. These opportunities are almost always missed. 5000 road names in Oxfordshire, especially in Bicester and Oxford are named after aspects of nature, why isn’t that leveraged to raise awareness?
We need to stand in the shoes of nature to really understand the thread. I know of a farmer who stood in the shoes of a dung beetle during an event, and that really helped develop her perspective.
We really are a cancer on planet earth, and we really need to add nature's voice to governance. We really need to add more groups including cultural groups to this debate. Yet has anyone asked what aspect of nature these groups care about the most, as a way of understanding how to motivate them to get involved?
If a CEO of a business didn’t know this about their client base, they would be sacked. When trying to engage a wider demographic, and broaden it out from white middle aged people, should we be trying to attract them to our events, or getting involved with their events?”
In response to Debs' question Stuart and William offer a nuanced perspective on human behaviour and our relationship with nature. Stuart observes that the COVID-19 lockdowns demonstrate our tendency to follow rules and conform, at least initially, while William adds that this behaviour also reveals our inherent selfishness. Stuart points out that nature was largely overlooked during this period, highlighting our disconnect from the natural world. This prompts William to question whether selfishness is uniquely human or a trait shared by other species.
The second question they dive into in this episode is from Yenifer from which is as follows:
“Can we really be whatever we want to be?”
In response to Yenifer's question about personal potential, Stuart and William offer a balanced view on individual aspirations and societal constraints. Stuart cynically notes that our choices are limited by societal structures, mentioning the "old boy's network". William agrees but suggests using positive self-talk to shape our identity and goals.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/45vuCPP,, support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://shorturl.at/lsuZM
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair:https://shorturl.at/2Iald
Why do we do this podcast?
We do it to stop the big issues slipping into the shadows. We talk about listener questions as that's what's important to them, and always try to bring it back to the natural world in some way. We have the conversations that need having.
It’s not the usual ambience in this episode, as we are back out in Stuart’s courtyard garden again. So expect some interesting background sounds.
Shreenika, Western Province, Sri Lanka is the listener tasked with asking the first question.
“How often does ego permeate human consciousness on an individual basis and how damaging is it?”
Your co-hosts Stuart and William feel ego is like that one song that gets stuck in your head—permanently permeating human consciousness. But if it’s left uncontrolled, it’s like an annoying earworm that just won’t quit!
Removing ego would be like stripping a pizza of its toppings—you’re left with a bland nothing. Ego’s a good tool, but a terrible master. It’s like having a pet tiger: assertive when needed, but you better know when to back off!”
Ego’s always there, lurking in the shadows. Like that neighbour who insists on borrowing your lawnmower every weekend.”
So, let’s treat ego like a Swiss Army knife—useful, but not the boss. Be aware of its role, wield it wisely, and don’t let it take over the show!
Yusuf, Kocaeli, Turkey asks the second listener question “Are we overly obsessed with what day of the week it is, or is that another example of how we categorise things. This time, time itself?”
William believes we’re overly obsessed with what day of the week it is. He particularly likes the saying “it does feel like a Monday today”, yet, what is a Monday actually meant to feel like?
Stuart has worked a lot on his own over the years, and he always mixed up his working week schedule as he didn’t want to feel that he was on a treadmill. When he had staff, he found they struggled with that unpredictability. Stuart feels we are obsessed with categorising. This can be damaging. This can be a barrier to quick adaptation.
William feels that the week comes from the structure of schooling, and on the topic of working hours, there are times we are extremely productive, and times we aren’t, but we still need to sit at our desk till our allotted time is done. For what conceivable reason would any employer or employee want to engage in such an activity when looking at the bigger picture?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
No waffle in this episode, we get straight into the listener questions, the first of which today is from Tess, in Stranrear, Scotland - “How damaging do you feel dismissing someone's opinion that you don’t like can be?”
Stuart emphasises that dismissing someone’s opinion is detrimental, limiting both yourself and the person you’re conversing with. Active listening fosters better understanding. He encourages us to listen to everyone and be open to challenging their and our own viewpoints.
William agrees, highlighting the danger of stereotyping. Forming quick judgments prevents us from truly hearing others. He notes that people may avoid listening out of fear they’ll agree. Stuart warns against falling into this habitual trap.
Tom, from Eastney, Portsmouth, England asks todays second question - “Wildlife campaigners are claiming huge amounts of countryside has been unnecessarily lost after the HS2 fast rail link was classed by a watchdog as, “unachievable”. The Infrastructure And Projects Authority (IPA) has given the programme a ‘red’ rating. After analysing plans for the construction of the first two phases from London to Birmingham and then onto Crewe in Cheshire, the official infrastructure watchdog, said in its view the project was undeliverable, in its current form. Estelle Bailey the Chief Executive of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust said “The vast project has been mismanaged from the start. It's taken a wrecking ball to nature”. In February 2023 the Wildlife Trusts claimed HS2 Limited “Made fundamental flaws in the way it assessed the value of nature along the construction path”. Estelle Bailey said further “It made huge errors in its calculations, undervaluing natural habitats and over-valuing the impacts of its compensation measure. If the project is abandoned then huge amounts of nature will have been lost, for nothing. We need to learn from this debacle. We’re living through a climate crisis and we can’t afford to make these costly mistakes”. Chap’s, what are your thoughts on this? I know you’ve done numerous episodes on HS2 as I’ve been quietly listening for a number of years now, but please revisit. Thanks”.
William criticises the management of the HS2 project, considering it a debacle. Despite being pro-HS2 due to the outdated Victorian-era rail routes, he acknowledges the mismanagement. Even though nature is always impacted by big projects, stopping the project now would mean nature’s loss has been potentially in vain, especially during the climate crisis. William emphasises the need for caution, recognizing human fallibility. He also highlights the overcrowded trains and the necessity of an improved rail system to reduce car usage.
Stuart questions whether HS2 is permanently unachievable and whether large projects can avoid harming nature. He suggests that a point system valuing nature in these project might be impractical.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Trigger Warning: This episode covers the sensitive topics of euthanasia and death. Listener discretion is strongly advised.
On this thought-provoking episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow tackle two profound questions from listeners in Scotland.
First up, Tess from Stranraer asks the following:
“Is the time now right in the UK for assisted dying, assisted suicide or assisted Euthanasia, whatever you want to call it, to be legalised? Some of the public seem to want it, when some people working in palliative nursing still don’t. So who is right? Should it just be for people close to death to relieve pain and suffering, when the alternative to assisted dying means more pain and suffering in the lead up to certain death? Do you think we need to improve the palliative care that's available to avoid this, or pursue assisted dying for certain types, on a case by case basis? If so, who moderates that as you often say on this podcast?”
Stuart believes it should be legalised on a case-by-case basis, but not institutionalised, expressing concern that legislation could turn it into a bureaucratic "tick box exercise". William explores how death remains an uncomfortable topic in Western cultures, fraught with intense emotions, even around unassisted passing. Both hosts agree euthanasia is a complex issue without clear answers, so society must continue discussing openly.
Then, Tommy from Alloa in Scotland poses the next question for discussion:
“You talk about thinking 8 generations forward and back. With that in mind, are we doing the right stuff right now for the generations to follow when considering the climate crisis we indisputably face?”
Stuart brings up the fact that merely recognizing the impact on those eight generations is a good start. William advocates learning from the past about what we did well and poorly, while avoiding rushed construction that fails to fully consider long-term ramifications. Both Stuart and William challenge listeners to embrace "intergenerational thinking" in all their endeavours, looking beyond short political cycles, and more towards lasting positive change.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: https://www.change.org/p/improve-the-oxfordshire-countryside-accessibility-for-all-disabilities-and-abilities
Fundraiser For An Extreme 8 All-terrain Wheelchair: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
In their signature unvarnished style, your co-hosts, Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow aren't afraid to push boundaries, and explore taboo subjects often left undiscussed. Prepare to have your assumptions challenged, as these two plumb the depths of protests and trigger warnings, from refreshingly candid angles.
First up, Stuart and William dive into the nature of protests, which was prompted by the following question from listener Imelda in Pichincha, Ecuador - “Does effective protest have to be disruptive and noisy?”
Stuart ponders if art can be a form of protest, while William wonders aloud what even constitutes a true "protest". From silent sit-ins to raucous street marches, they explore the many faces of activist expression.
Next it's on to the prickly topic of trigger warnings, where your co-hosts are triggered into the conversation by the following listener question, which came from Layla in Bahrain - “Are trigger warnings really needed? I know they are good for strobe lights etc that can have physical impacts, but let's focus on things like Shakespere plays, where we half expect to see scenes of violence. It can have more impact if we’re not fully expecting it. Should TW’s be on podcasts like yours, because I worry about the potential learning by the listener being exposed to such material, is watered down because we might be pussy footing around people's feelings too much? It's vital we get the balance around this right, but where is that balance, and who dictates where that is? Balance means different things in different countries too”.
Stuart argues some trigger warnings are necessary (like seizure warnings), but that we risk being overly cautious. William raises the example of film ratings providing upfront content advisories. But is there value in experiencing art's shocks and surprises organically and unexpectedly? The pair debate whether ubiquitous trigger warnings diminish their purpose and cause us to live lives of avoidance, or if they are simply a necessity in our hyper-connected age.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice, and we like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
The fundraiser to get Stuart back out into nature with an all-terrain chair is also mentioned again today, and you can donate here https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ExactTarget&utm_campaign=20240518_
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Charlie, from Montrose, Scotland has sent in this listener question - “Who owns land is at the heart of the housing crisis in the UK. It's not because bricks and mortar have suddenly become incredibly expensive. It's because the value of land has gone through the roof. Is it possible to own land though when we as humans came from it, are part of it, and ultimately, will go back to it?”
Stuart feels that land ownership is all an illusion and the concept of land ownership has been going on for centuries. Indigenous cultures ask the question, how can you own yourself? Stuart contests Charlie’s question, exploring that isn’t the way that we disperse our population, and how we use and repurpose the buildings we already have, really at the heart of this matter?
Stuart’s action is for you to stand back and look at your life, and ask yourself do you really own anything?
William sees land ownership, in the UK, as a form of control. You get to dictate who is allowed on your land. He contrasts this with what happens in Finland which has the right to roam. He believes that land ownership is just a piece of paper that states you do. He further explores how there can often be issues with legacy that leaves housing empty.
William’s action is to put some pressure on politicians for how we use existing buildings that can be easily utilised as housing, but currently aren’t. He goes on to want people not to get onto the property ladder just because you feel you should, just to keep up.
Gary, from Stirling, Scotland asks the second question - “Can you guys recommend any books that are worth reading?”
Stuart recommends
- The Bible,
- The Hidden Life of Trees by Peter Wohlleben.
- https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/The-Hidden-Life-of-Trees-by-Peter-Wohlleben-author-Jane-Billinghurst-translator/9780008218430
William recommends
- Notes On A Nervous Planet by Matt Haig.
-
https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/Notes-on-a-Nervous-Planet-by-Matt-Haig/9781786892690
-
Bulletproof by Chantal by Chantal Burns.
- https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/Bulletproof-by-Chantal-Burns/9781292330020
William’s action is to become a member of your local library as it is an amazing resource. It’s good for you, and it is good for the library, as they often offer lots of other really useful services.
The fundraiser to get Stuart back out into nature with an all-terrain chair is also mentioned again today, and you can donate here https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ExactTarget&utm_campaign=20240518_
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Mariama, a listener from Sierra Leone has sent this question in for discussion on today's episode - “For a few years I lived in Cumbria in the UK, and miss your country walks there. Countryside here in Sierra Leone is a very different thing though. Tell me, what frustrates you guys the most about the countryside in the UK?”
The biggest thing that frustrates Stuart are gates that block access to green spaces for certain disabilities, and that some gates are accessible to some wheelchairs and not others. Though he’s also frustrated that people generally stick to the well beaten track and how we’re obsessed with how the hedgehog is decline in the UK, yet there are other animals that are in more imminent danger.
Stuart’s action is to open your eyes and ears when you’re out in nature, and to put your damn phones down!
William’s biggest issue with access to the countryside is that if it’s private land, the king and his castle attitude pervades. He also sees people following a habit about where they go in the countryside, going to the same places as everyone else. Not off the beaten track. He talks about the habits we take into the countryside that don’t need to be there, such as being on your phone, and not being mindful of your surroundings.
William’s action is to think about why you go out into nature.
The fundraiser to get Stuart back out into nature with an all-terrain chair is mentioned, and you can donate here https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ExactTarget&utm_campaign=20240518_
Tommy, from Alloa, Scotland has set this second question today - “Concealing wealth is part and parcel of preserving it. Are the wealthy really as insecure as it would seem to me?”
Stuart asks how we can truly know whether someone is insecure, and brings up how those who win the lottery often conceal they’ve done so, but is that down to insecurity?
William carries this thought on, that it’s often a good idea to conceal a big win as people suddenly crawl out of the woodwork, and ask for money.
Stuart talks about those who are born into wealth and the idea of hiding what someone is investing is as a way of concealing things, but again is that down to insecurity? He doesn’t know what Tommy’s angle is as he isn’t sat with them, he does however get the impression that Tommy’s banging the wealthy over the head for being wealthy.
Stuart raises that maybe those with wealth can be petrified of losing their wealth, and ends up by throwing a question back at Tommy: So what if people are concealing their wealth?
William wonders whether wealth is concealed as a way to avoid taxes? Stating that the best way to use your own wealth is not to feel you need to show it off, and that those who show their wealth are potentially more insecure. He also feels it doesn’t mean that if someone is concealing their wealth they are insecure either, they maybe just don’t want to flaunt it.
He further brings up that even if they had a wealthy person in the room with them, they wouldn’t necessarily be indicative of everyone with wealth.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this short episode, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow reflect on reaching the impressive 500 episode mark for this podcast. The big question on everyone's mind - will they make it to the ultra-rare 1,000 episode club?
Stuart is bullish on the prospect, believing if they keep up their well-oiled podcast production process, the 1,000 episode milestone will come along naturally. William, ever the pragmatist, prefers to focus just on creating the next great episode, rather than thinking too far ahead.
While reaching 1,000 episodes would certainly be a unique achievement in the podcasting world, the hosts agree that arbitrary numbers aren't their main motivation. As William states, he has no desire to simply "pootle along" chasing a number.
For Stuart and William, the real drive is continuing to engage their audience with entertaining, insightful content, episode after episode. Still, they can't help but revel in the 500 episode landmark as a testament to their longevity and consistency in the podcasting game.
Listen in for this celebratory episode as the hosts look back on their podcast journey so far, whilst pondering what the future may hold. Wherever they end up, you can be sure every episode will be a wild ride!
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
As 2024 unfolds before us, your co-hosts William and Stuart embark on a discussion about the year ahead.
They talk about the future of the podcast, and how they currently have listener questions lined up and in the kitty, and what would happen if that supply would one day run out.
Stuart delves into how the fundraiser for the Extreme 8 is his biggest personal focus.
Throughout this bonus episode they together navigate the dynamics of their partnership, balancing immediate priorities with long-term aspirations.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like discussed on this podcast? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Ah, the sweet serenade of the dawn chorus!
When was the last time you really listened to the birds singing, particularly in the morning?
Well today Stuart and William are highlighting that it’s International Dawn Chorus Day.
The release time of this bonus episode is 5am, which is the perfect time to get out and listen to nature's greatest symphony.
And there you have it! Stuart and William, embracing the early morning madness of the feathered talent show. Remember, folks, it’s not just about hearing the birds; it’s about really listening to their feathered ballads. Happy International Dawn Chorus Day!
(Disclaimer: No actual birds were harmed in the making of this podcast).
You can find out more about this day with the following links:
wildlifetrusts.org/dawn-chorus-day
rspb.org.uk/the-dawn-chorus-all-you-need-to-know-about-natures-big-show
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hopefully this episode will stretch your thinking today and explore opinions you might not have thought about before.
Isla, a listener from Arbroath, Scotland has sent in this question for your co-hosts to dig in to:
“Are there limits to human creativity? Is your answer informed by your own understanding of yourselves or deeply influenced by society?”
William brings up the idea of lateral thinking. Where you think of answers that aren’t immediately obvious. As he’s a photographer, he sees there being a limit to creativity in that we are bound by technology, and in general he also feels there is a limit, as humans are a limited species. He talks about seeing creativity being present in all aspects of life, not just art. Being creative is in a way sticking your head above the parapet, and it could mean you stand out and will potentially be shot down. That’s where societal pressure comes in. William reiterates that creativity is prevalent in our whole life, not just being artistic.
William’s action is to remember we’re all creative.
Stuart feels there are limitations to human creativity because of the baggage we bring into the creative process, it can also be whether or not we’re in the mood. He feels that our creativity is influenced by both our understanding, or lack of understanding of ourselves. He doesn’t believe that the influence of society is deep, but it is there.
Stuart talks about how his creativity is massively influenced by society, because he wants to do his own thing. Neither Stuart and William have craved approval from society.
Eduard, from Altona, Germany asks the second listener question today:
“Is a sense of humour a byproduct of consciousness or something else entirely?”
William understands that a sense of humour is an evolutionary thing. It is a moment of release, it is a way of showing everything is ok. He further talks about how humour is a tribal thing. It’s an indication that everything is fine.
Stuart raises the point that to experience humour, you need to be conscious, and asks would humour still exist without humans, or is it a human construct?
Stuart’s action is to see the silliness in life helps relieve pressures. To take a step back before reacting. Take some time before reacting.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to another thought-provoking episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow take you on a journey through the depths of philosophical inquiry, with a sprinkle of chaos and a dash of order.
In today's episode, two listener questions are tackled by your co-hosts, challenging our perceptions and pushing the boundaries of our understanding. The two listener questions are from opposite sides of the globe, with Velma from Sitka, Alaska, USA, and Tom from Eastney, Portsmouth, England.
Velma’s question comes along first and is as follows:
“In your opinions, is there inherent order in nature or is it all chaos and chance?”
Velma's question ignites a discussion as William boldly declares chaos and chance as the driving forces of the universe, while Stuart finds solace in the delicate balance of order and chaos, exemplified by the intricate dance of the food chain in nature.
And then here is Tom’s question:
“Is it possible to prove that other people besides ourselves have consciousness?”
Tom’s inquiry prompts Stuart to question the possibility again of shared consciousness among individuals, while William challenges the very notion of proving consciousness. As the conversation unfolds, they grapple with the complexities of philosophy, evolution, and the inherent challenges of understanding our own existence in a world teeming with chaos.
Listen in as Stuart and William navigate the murky waters of existential inquiry, striving to find meaning amidst the chaos, and perhaps uncovering more questions than answers along the way.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to another thought-provoking episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, co-hosted by none other than Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow.
In today's instalment, they delve into the minds of listeners from far-flung corners of the globe – Muna from Kaafu Atoll, Maldives, and Robert from Fishponds, Bristol, England.
First up is the question from Muna:
“With many countries now trying to reliably travel to the moon, I’ve already heard it said, colonising the moon will allow us to access the minerals in holds. Have we learnt nothing?”
Inspired by Muna's question, Stuart and William contemplate humanity's learning curve. Is the moon truly the elusive answer to our questions, or are we simply trapped in repetitive cycles, dictated by vested interests?
And here is the question from Robert:
”What if anything would you genetically change about humans to make them a better species?”
From Robert's question, the conversation takes a philosophical turn. Should we tamper with the fabric of existence, or is it wiser to embrace the status quo? Stuart and William weigh in on the delicate balance between progress and preservation.
Listen in to discover the complexities of the human condition and the mysteries of the universe, as Stuart and William navigate through a landscape of ideas, questions, and endless possibilities, with as always, a little silliness thrown in for good measure.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Carolien, from South Holland, The Netherlands, sets the first question to be discussed today - “When you both think back, what do you remember most about your working collaboration? Would that be the same as other people have?”
William highlights the enjoyable collaboration with Stuart, which has faced challenges but evolved into a rewarding experience. Their strong criteria for working together has fostered reliability. Despite opportunities to part ways, both William and Stuart have remained committed. Stuart humorously acknowledges William’s influence, emphasising the rarity of finding reliable, long-term collaborators.
Yusuf, from Kocaeli, Turkey sets the second listener question for todays episode - “Interested to hear both your thoughts on modern film making techniques and style as an effective way to motivate and get urgent environmental messages out there?”
Stuart critiques modern filming techniques, particularly their impact on people with epilepsy and the artificiality of the ‘BBC way of talking.’ He advocates for slowing down and avoiding short snippets. Stuart also highlights the overreliance on effects and the need for techniques that consider diverse cognitive abilities. He also feels modern film treats audiences as though they’re in the middle of an orgasm, when it should be more directed at when someone is drinking a steady pint of Guinness.
William emphasises the importance of allowing film scenes to breathe, citing the film The End We Start From as an example of effective storytelling through measured pacing.
Both agree on the value of creativity over repetition.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hopefully this podcast will stretch your thinking.
Teddy, a listener from Norwich, England, sent your co-hosts Stuart and William a question to discuss - “For man to leave earth and colonise space, it's felt we need to lengthen our own lifespans somewhat, or become immortal, due to the time needed to cover the vast distances. Will we be doing that travel through avatars, or biological robots that we direct remotely through neurological pathways? If we do that will that mean we as the pilots still aren’t immortal, but the vessel is? Can anything last forever though?”
William highlights the challenges posed by the speed of light, emphasising the significant delay in data transmission. Even Mars, our neighbouring planet, presents difficulties due to vast distances and our current understanding of physics. Interstellar travel remains beyond our reach, and human bodies are ill-suited for space conditions.
William also doubts that extraterrestrial species have visited Earth, given the immense interstellar gaps.
Stuart counters by pointing out our energy limitations on Earth. Prolonged human lifespans introduce medical complexities, making long-distance space travel problematic. He advocates addressing terrestrial issues before venturing into space, as we already leave debris and prioritise mineral extraction. Stuart questions the motivation behind exploring new worlds, considering the inevitable breakdown of robots sent into space.
In summary, the conversation revolves around the feasibility of interstellar travel, our planetary responsibilities, and the purpose of space exploration.
Shreenika, from Western Province, Sri Lanka offers up the second question for discussion - “Never set a question for this podcast before. Thanks for the opportunity. How precarious is human existence?”
Stuart acknowledges the fleeting nature of human existence and asserts that some form of survival will persist regardless of future events. He proposes investigating the origin of the word “precarious.”
William emphasises our ability to control certain aspects, such as wars, while acknowledging uncontrollable threats like meteorite impacts. He raises concerns about the possibility of another pandemic due to increased human proximity.
William suggests that recognizing life’s precariousness should prompt us to appreciate moments and cherish connections with others.
In essence, the conversation revolves around existential uncertainty, human agency, and the value of embracing the present.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where the aim is to be a friend in your ear during these challenging times.
In today's therapy session for your co-hosts Stuart and William, you’ll take a dive into listener questions from Wally in Manchester, England, and Jayne in York, England.
We begin with Wally’s question, which is:
“What festivals do you guys like to celebrate yourselves?”
Off the back of Wally’s question William shares his joy of Midsummer celebrations in Finland, while Stuart reflects on a childhood, grounded in honouring seasons, spirits and solstices.
Together, they explore the significance of inviting others into our traditions, and promoting sustainable festivities.
We then move onto Jayne’s question, which is:
“Could you both share your own experiences and thoughts around grief?”
Inspired by Jayne’s question, Stuart explores the multifaceted nature of grief, acknowledging its impact is beyond the loss of loved ones, and delving into the complexities of missed opportunities and unfulfilled connections. While William shares insights into the evolution of grief, from moments of guilt to the profound realisation of personal identity beyond family ties, prompting introspection on mortality and legacy.
Tune in to this profound episode as Stuart and William explore the depths of human experience, finding solace and wisdom amidst life's celebrations and sorrows.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, the down-to-earth co-hosts of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, as they dive into uncharted waters with no preparation, no scripts, just honest, genuine and relatable discussions.
In this episode, they tackle thought-provoking questions from Paco in Wimbledon, England, and Fanaka from Kenya.
First up is the question from Paco which is as follows:
“What does nothing feel like?”
From Paco’s question, Stuart reflects on the concept of emotional numbness, exploring the idea of experiencing a lack of feelings when confronted with some things.
William challenges the notion, asserting that as humans, feeling nothing, is impossible.
The conversation takes an introspective turn as they explore meditation, and the philosophical question of whether true nothingness, can ever be achieved.
The second listener question of this episode is from Fanaka, and her question is:
“As co-hosts you speak openly, but that opens you up to criticism in return. How do you deal with that?”
Inspired by Fanaka’s question, William and Stuart share their experiences of criticism, acknowledging that it's a rare occurrence, but a valuable one when it happens.
Stuart, known for his candid expressions, and not shying away from taboo subjects, discusses how there's a feeling of frustration within him, with certain topics rarely openly being discussed, which is sometimes relieved by discussing some of the questions sent in by listeners. He also goes onto talk about how he welcomes criticism as a tool for growth.
During this discussion the co-hosts speak about when they revisited a past controversial episode, with a ‘critics' points in mind during that particular second discussion, demonstrating their commitment to evolving themselves and engaging in meaningful discussions.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Alan, a listener from Northway, Oxford, England sent in this question for discussion - “Is it excessive for the build up to Christmas to start in September, October and November? Is it a December thing?”
Ah, the Christmas festive frenzy! William’s got a point: September to December can be like a shopping marathon – you start shopping early, stash gifts, often consuming them yourself, and then sprint at the end to buy more.
But Stuart’s onto something too. Those Christmas displays? They’re like tabloids – full of sensational nonsense. We should just say, “No thanks”
And that tat, Oh, that tat! People flaunt it like, “Look at my wealth – I’ve got a plastic snow globe!”
Stuart’s right – Christmas stock’s are like that old sweater in your closet: always there, never worn.
Let’s voice our unhappiness!
So, here’s to September to December – a season of chaos, tinsel, and more “ho ho ho” than a caffeine-fueled Santa!
Heather, a listener in Ablington, Wiltshire, England sent in the second question for today - “Do you believe anyone when they say they don’t have any regrets?”
Stuart always says he doesn't have any regrets, he sees it as a mindset thing. He consciously moves on. It’s often down to personal prioritising, that you end up with regrets because you’ve prioritised something else.
It’s like when you’re standing in the queue at the chippy, right? You’ve got your eyes on that tray of golden, crispy chips, and you’re thinking, “This is it, this is the moment!” But then, just as you’re about to place your order, your mate Dave elbows you and says, “Oi, mate, they’ve got curry sauce today!” And suddenly, your whole world shifts. Curry sauce! It’s like the universe just handed you a winning scratch card.
Now, priorities, they’re a bit like that. Life throws 'em at you, all unexpected-like. You’re there, juggling work, family, and trying to remember where you left your car keys. And then, out of nowhere, your brain goes, “Hey, remember that time you didn’t call your grandma on her birthday? Yeah, that’s a regret right there.” And you’re left standing in the queue of life, wondering if you should’ve ordered the curry sauce.
But William, he’s got it figured out. He’s like a zen master of priorities. He’s standing on the edge of a cliff, wind in his hair, and he’s thinking, “If I could time-travel, would I tell my younger self to invest in Bitcoin or just buy more socks?” And you know what? He wouldn’t say a word. Because life’s a bit like a dodgy GPS – you take a wrong turn, end up in a field, but hey, at least you’ve got a nice view of some sheep.
So, William’s got regrets, sure. Maybe he wishes he’d learned to play the ukulele or finally tried that pineapple pizza. But he doesn’t dwell on it. Life’s too short for that. Instead, he’s out there, chasing sunsets and making peace with the fact that sometimes, you’ve just got to choose between chips and curry sauce.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Fred, a listener from St Just, Cornwall, England, set the first question to be explored today - “In the UK we put the clock back an hour in October and forward an hour in March. Now we have digital clocks that automatically alter, and now we live in a world of quick communication, and we buzz between time zones readily. Is it time for the UK to stop doing this? I think we started doing this in the early 1900’s to save and conserve energy. Not sure if it's true but I read William Willett, the great-great-grandfather of Coldplay’s Chris Martin, set up a campaign before the first world war pushing for clocks to go forward in spring and back in winter so that people could spend more time outdoors during the day and save energy”.
William your co-host suggests that the time difference might be related to harvesting. He acknowledges that not all countries have adopted this system, especially some US counties. He views it as being linked to labour.
Stuart the other co-host believes that the main advantage of clock changes is providing school children with more evening light. However, he thinks confusion arises for those who don’t adjust their clocks. Stuart proposes reimagining work schedules to alleviate congestion caused by synchronised movement, routines and start times.
In summary, the clock-changing debate involves practical considerations, nature’s rhythms, and potential benefits.
Heather, a listener from in Ablington, Wiltshire, England sets us the second question in todays episode - “What do you think about AI, good or bad? Is it a friend or foe? Should we rage against the AI machine?”
William views AI as a powerful tool, not sentient but capable of both good and bad. He highlights its use in monitoring potential tsunamis in the Indian Ocean, and specific prompts crucial for effective AI interaction. The biggest danger for some, according to William, lies in AI potentially replacing artists, but he doesn't fully agree with this. He appreciates music’s rough edges and encourages playfulness with AI. Stuart raises concerns about AI running amok, trapped in self-reinforcing cycles. Stuart’s advice: Reflect on AI’s impact in your own life. It’s already woven into our existence.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome back to another wild ride with Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and partner in podcast crime, William ‘The Waffler’
Mankelow. In today's episode, they dive deep into two listener questions that have them pondering the mysteries of life, politics, and the great outdoors.
The first comes from Alan in Northway, Oxford England, his question is: “In October 2023 Rishi Sunak, UK Prime Minister, cancelled the Birmingham to Manchester leg of the new HS2 fast railway (what's the point then of the leg that is to be built from London to Birmingham), and also dropped or altered a lot of policies that could help reduce the effects of climate change in the UK. In the run up to a general election, this all looks like an aim to gain more votes. This stuff has an impact on humanity well into the future, so is it time for the big decisions like this to be made by a larger coalition, and not just one political party and one leader?”I ask is it right legally or ethically for the agreed timeline for the UK to meet Net Zero to seemingly be changed at will by the PM.
While discussing Alan’s questions, William takes us on a journey through the stages of big projects and questions the management of HS2, while Stuart wonders if politicians are fit for setting long-term policies, or for just playing the short-term game. Is HS2 a vote winner, or is Rishi Sunak's replacement the real show-stealer?
The second listener question is brought to us by Vandana in India, and her question is as follows: - “It's said the human species has 250,000 years of genetics running through its veins. Our universal appreciation for the beauty of the natural world comes from those genetics as we came from caves and the land. If the appreciation is genetic then can the ability to so easily remove ourselves, lose awareness of, and not connect with the natural world be genetic too? If it is, then we are seemingly being pulled away from and pulled towards at the same time. Is it in our genetics to get the balance right?”
Off the back of this question, Stuart challenges you to dig deep – what's fueling your nature vibes? Genetic predisposition, upbringing, or a mix of both? And William's got a remedy for any nature-phobia – get outside, explore those green spaces, and let Mother Nature work her magic on your soul.
Join us in breaking down barriers for Stuart! Your support not only provides him with an all-terrain wheelchair for outdoor workshops, but also creates a sanctuary for him to start working from again. He’s engaged around 20,000 clients with nature over the years. Let's make a difference together and help him engage 1000’s more. Check out the fundraiser here: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
A trigger warning is issued for this episode, as the conversation delves into the sensitive subjects of suicide and death. We urge listeners to consider their comfort level with such topics before proceeding.
Prepare yourself for some delightful waffle in this episode! We appreciate the 26 listeners questions we have lined up; thanks for sending them in. If you have a burning question, feel free to drop us an email at thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com.
Welcome to another thought-provoking episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William ‘The Waffler’ Mankelow dive into two intriguing listener questions. In this episode, they explore perspectives from Alan in Northway, Oxford, and Vandana from India.
Alan’s question is as follows:
“Chris Packham recently tweeted “Personally , I've now reached a point where I believe breaking the law for the climate is the ethically responsible thing to do”, do you think as a public figure he should be saying such things? He seems to be becoming a disrupter, and a humanity hooligan, is this wise for his career?”
Stuart passionately contends that breaking the law is a personal choice, emphasising that it's not merely about the action, but the impact on others. William, curious about the outcomes of such actions, questions the achievements of actually breaking the law.
Vandana’s question is as follows:
“I heard Stuart you are getting a couple of wheelchairs to help with your mobility issues, so, which bits of the countryside are you looking forward to reacquainting yourself with?”
Stuart shares his anticipation of being back out in nature, emphasising that he won't fully grasp what he's missed until he's immersed in it again. William reflects on the emotional impact of being in nature, emphasising the experience over a specific location. The hosts explore the idea of nature helping people reconnect with themselves, and the importance of an all-terrain wheelchair for Stuart in facilitating these experiences for the public. The link to the fundraiser we’ve got running for that extra chair is here: justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Join Stuart and William in this engaging episode as they navigate the complexities of ethics, activism, and the profound connection between humanity and nature.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Ivy, from Worthing, West Sussex, England poses the first listener question in todays episode for your co-hosts do discuss: Link to the question
William and Stuart – the dynamic duo of deep thoughts and questionable life choices, offer their musings.
William starts with the stigma of being arrested. It can be like a membership card/medal/trophy for some. Picture this though: William’s at a climate protest, wearing his “Save the Planet” T-shirt, and suddenly the cuffs come out. He’s torn between two worlds: eco-warrior or accidental trespasser. It’s like he’s playing climate change Twister – left foot on “awareness,” right hand on “impending arrest.”
William thinks getting arrested might backfire on your message. Imagine you’re mid-protest, and the police swoop in. Suddenly, your chant changes from “Hey, hey, ho, ho, fossil fuels have got to go!” to “Hey, hey, ho, ho, my bail’s set too low!” Not exactly the eco-friendly revolution you had in mind.
Stuart – the guy who’s like a human Sudoku puzzle: complex, but ultimately pointless. He flips the script and asks, “Is it ever wrong to be arrested?” Deep, right? He’s got a point, though.
But being arrested – is it the new status symbol for some though, something to brag about. Move over, Gucci handbags; it’s all about “Cellblock Chic.” Imagine the Instagram captions: “Just got arrested for climate change. #EcoGlam #Cellfie.”
Then Stuart drops the mic: Getting arrested – is it like a window into some people’s possible intellect, meaning their message could be overruled more easily by the ultimate decision makers?
Next time you’re at a protest, remember: “To be or not to be arrested?” That is the question. And if you choose “to be,” make sure your mugshot shows off your good side. After all, even in the clink, it’s all about those eco-friendly angles!
Mary, from Gorse Hill, Swindon, Wiltshire, England poses the second listener question today: Link to the question
Stuart and William discuss the “us and them” attitude, inspired by another listener named Elaine from Telford who asked a question in a previous episode. Stuart emphasises that despite feeling insignificant, we must take action against the climate crisis. He advocates for varying language and attitudes to keep messages fresh.
Common ground is crucial, even when sharing personal experiences. Stuart highlights the power of silence in getting a message across. He warns that perceived bullying and an unwillingness to drift too far from entrenched views, may actually be our own behaviour too.
William, while still flying, focuses on mindful consumption at home. He emphasises adapting communication to cultural context and suggests seeking common ground by sharing barriers.
In summary, both hosts encourage meaningful dialogue and self-awareness to bridge divides and avoid preachiness.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Elaine, from Telford, in Shropshire, England sends in this first listener question for discussion today.
“Like you guys probably, I’ve been to many public meetings, run by scientists who specialise in systems thinking, filled with community activists, trying to develop new more sustainable circular systems that society can then hang itself on, and frame itself around. The aim being to try and mitigate the climate and ecological crisis that we all face. We don’t have to try too hard these days to convince people we need to act to avert disaster, because unless the natural world's health is generally good, then humanity will struggle to survive.
The general issue and barrier to people making changes in their lives is there's a lack of leadership and direction from the people with the power to galvanise us. The leaders, decision makers and people with vested interests in maintaining the ‘business as usual’ attitude, rarely attend these meetings, or absorb the feedback these meetings produce. How do we break down the ‘them and us’ culture that's evolving in the adaptation process we’re all in, and how do we get everybody at these meetings, instead of the separation and separate meetings we see now?
It's not too late, we’ve not yet polluted as much as we think, and the unfairness in the world's societies is not too advanced either. That's just my view, and my view is there's still an opportunity for a fair and just survival”.
Stuart infers that Elaine’s question pertains to the doughnut economy framework, which proposes a social and ecological boundary for human development. He asserts that one of the challenges to implementing this framework is the low self-efficacy of potential stakeholders. He illustrates this point by recounting the case of someone he knew who shunned meeting attendance, irrespective of the agenda.
Stuart observes that meetings often induce a herd mentality, where individuals conform to the prevailing opinions and suppress dissent and alternatives. He recommends that a more productive strategy is maybe to distance oneself from emotional attachments, listen attentively to diverse viewpoints, and refrain from judging others.
William worries that these meetings can make certain attendees feel dumb, because one can’t always follow the jargon thrown around.
The second listener question discussed today is from Paco, in Wimbledon, England.
“I’ve seen viruses and pathogens that have been extinct for 30,000 years, but found frozen in the world's ice caps, have been reactivated in the laboratory when pairing them up with ameba. If these frozen viruses emerge from the melting ice and find their way into the world's rivers and oceans, do they pose a new threat to humans as they could morph into something else if the conditions are perfect, like in the lab?”
William wonders if living in the wrong place as it were, your geographical location, can make you more susceptible to falling sick, and wants to know who’s waking up the germs from their long naps. He wants to understand why and how the viruses and pathogens are being reactivated? He thinks maybe they’re just cranky because they missed their breakfast.
Stuart discusses the problem of Methane, which is trapped in ice sheets and released into the atmosphere, and how it will take millennia for it to be fully emitted, but, even a partial emission can have detrimental effects.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss on this podcast? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/45vuCPP , support our work through Patreon https://bit.ly/3UmtDyr. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
A trigger warning is issued for this episode, as the conversation delves into the sensitive subjects of suicide and death, we urge listeners to consider their comfort level with such topics before proceeding.
In this thought-provoking episode, Stuart and William embark on a journey, prompted by questions from listeners Iris in Wetley Rocks, Staffordshire, England, and Fanaka in Kenya. Two people geographically distant, but brought together through listening to this podcast. The hosts dive deep into the realms of life and death due to the nature of these particular questions.
The question from Iris in Wetley Rocks, Staffordshire, England is as follows,
“I’m back guys, still listening. My next question is, who would cry at your funerals?”
In response, Stuart raises a poignant point about why people cry at funerals, attributing it to a range of emotions such as guilt, missed opportunities, sadness, and attachment. The hosts refuse to dictate who would shed tears at their own funerals, leaving it to the unpredictable nature of genuine emotions.William reflects on his personal experiences of grief, describing it as a natural process, that goes beyond societal pressures. He draws inspiration from his mother's influence in navigating moments of sorrow.
And here is the question from Fanaka from Kenya:
“If you hadn’t met one another what would you both be doing with your lives now?”
From Fanaka's question, the hosts grapple with hypothetical scenarios, contemplating the impact of their collaboration on their individual lives, and what would happen if they were to part ways.
As the episode unfolds, Stuart and William find a profound connection between the questions raised by Iris and Fanaka—one about death and the other about life. The exploration of these themes intertwines, revealing the intricate balance between the two fundamental aspects of our existence.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Nature can be a puzzle when trying to unravel the threads of and the motivations behind tree planting, and population growth.
Welcome to another episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where your cohosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow delve into the intricacies of two thought-provoking questions posed by listeners.
In this episode, listener Elaine from Telford, England, sparks a debate about humanity's place in the natural order. Elaine’s questions is as follows:
“Right from the start, life's evolution has always formed and influenced the makeup of the Earth's atmosphere, with various tipping points along the way. Why wouldn’t man’s population passing 9.5 billion again be a tipping point? When will we all admit that human existence will have positive and negative effects on the planet? Will there ever be a time when we’re not motivated to change just because it has a personal benefit on us or our pockets?”
William resonates with the idea that we are an integral part of nature, questioning if our current population growth is simply a facet of the natural process. Stuart delves into the consequences of human actions, emphasising the conscious impact we have on the environment compared to previous species. They explore together the concept of sustainability, touching on the challenges of controlling population growth and the complexities of an ageing demographic.
Listener Roman from Slovakia, brings forward a question on the effectiveness of tree planting in addressing environmental issues. The question is as follows:
“Is tree planting the best thing for conservation? Natural succession gives you functioning communities of trees and shrubs genetically suited to their environment, plus all the species that go along with that. Firstly, planting trees by-passes the natural successional stages that so much of our biodiversity depends on. Secondly, many planted trees are not from local genetic stock and sometimes not even from the same country. Thirdly, many/most planted trees are not properly looked after and many die. Fourthly, and leading on from the above, planting trees costs a lot of money and if many/most die it's arguably a waste of money. Is it better to reduce the amount of trees we are cutting down and the drivers behind that cutting?”
Stuart challenges the notion that tree planting alone can solve problems, highlighting the importance of considering how, when, and where it's done. William expands on the idea, stressing the need for diverse habitats and cautioning against a narrow focus on creating forests. The cohosts examine the deeper implications of planting trees, contemplating the anthropocentric perspective and emphasising the importance of caring for the trees we plant.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Hi guys, I’m back, always listening but not sent in a question for you to discuss too often these days. Can I ask, who do you feel the BBC is lining up to replace Sir David Attenborough? Who do you think could replace him?”
That’s the first listener question sent for discussion, and that comes from Vandana in India.
There are people like Chris Packham and Simon Reeve, who though aren’t exactly being lined up to replace him, are perceptibly doing more.
Is there really a conscious choice to replace David Attenborough? We all know that we can’t. His influence will go on, as it is huge.
Stuart’s conclusion is that the BBC aren’t trying to replace him, and they really shouldn’t be, and should move onto someone else. William talks about the idea of replacement being incorrect, that you don’t replace, you get something new.
Pedro, a long standing listener from Portugal has sent in the second question for discussion today, and is as follows:
“40% of the Earth's surface, that isn’t frozen, is given over to intensive monoculture style farming, and the volume of plastic and concrete in the world is already more than the world's total biomass. To play devil's advocate for a minute, I could suggest humans are brutally efficient and growing and feeding most of the world populations, though distribution leaves a lot to be desired. The current process of sustaining our species means we are imitating the volcanoes that heated the world millions of years ago, by the volume of CO2 we are pumping out. Where do we search for hope though, do we look at humanity's own inventiveness to reverse this? For us to survive I feel we need to put planet Earth first, otherwise it will continue to evolve without us”.
William agrees with Pedro’s devil's advocacy, and that as a species we’re brutally efficient at survival. Even something like the black death didn’t kill us off, and in some ways did lead to how we live today.
Stuart finds the analogy that humans and their habits are like a giant volcano, interesting. It echo’s a thought he had in a previous episode where he believed that us humans are like a giant panda, an evolutionary dead end.
In conclusion, your co-hosts feel we as a species are often at our best when we’re pushed into action, when we’re cornered.
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss on a future episode of this podcast? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
2024 starts with a new format for this podcast. Instead of releases at 10am UK on Tuesdays and Sundays, with one listener question covered in each episode. We’re now just releasing on Sundays, but still at 10am UK time. Now though you’ll get two listener questions per episode. So we're going longer form.
Debs, Didcot, Oxfordshire, England sets the first question of the year, which is:
“Is the male/female opinion societally influenced, genetically influenced or independent of all outside influences, and how does that influence our willingness or unwillingness to live sustainably?”
Stuart explores that at different moments it can be any one of the three (societally influenced, genetically influenced or independent of all outside influences) it can be an overlap. There are rarely categorics.
William asks whether males have truly different opinions than females? That’s how he’d interpret part of this question.
Ella, Heaton Mersey, Stockport, Greater Manchester, England then sets the follow up listener question:
“In the UK MP’s seem to be drifting away from thinking their role is a service to us, not a job. A job within a mosaic of other jobs and outside interests. They seem to take well paid speaking opportunities over appearing in parliament. We shouldn’t get jealous about people making money, but I think lines are often crossed where MP’s constituents are not the priority. What role does this all take in MP’s not understanding the very real concerns of their constituents when it comes to climate change?”
William concludes with an action, and that is to check out what your local MP is doing so you can make an informed judgement about them. You may find this link useful in that https://members.parliament.uk/findyourmp
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William would like to wish you a Happy New Year, and don’t beat yourself up too much if you are unable to take your New Year’s resolutions beyond the 10th January.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are taking a break over Christmas and New Year and are offering an opportunity to relisten to an important episode in the back catalogue of this podcast.
Stuart chose this episode as it was refreshing to have a female perspective on the podcast which listening still stretches his own thinking.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are taking a break over Christmas and New Year and are offering an opportunity to relisten to an important episode in our back catalogue.
William chose this particular classic episode because a lot of what he shares comes directly from personal experience.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are just stopping by to wish you a Merry Christmas, and also to celebrate the 500th release of this podcast.
We hope you’ll continue to make this podcast part of your future listening habit.
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are taking a break over Christmas and New Year and are offering an opportunity to relisten to an important episode in the back catalogue of this podcast.
Stuart picked this episode as he feels it’s good to listen back to this particular one with fresh ears, and that is also our second most listened to episode ever.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are taking a break over Christmas and New Year and are offering an opportunity to relisten to an important episode in the back catalogue of this podcast.
William chose this particular classic as he felt that the subject of E Waste is important, and he likes how it demonstrates the format of this podcast. Him and Stuart can begin discussing one subject, and end up somewhere completely different by allowing the conversation to meander and breath.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow explore thought-provoking questions sent in by listeners on a wide variety of subjects, which they discuss, chew over, analyse, break down, and sometimes even debate.
We like to give you an ad-free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
In this episode, Alivia from Ridgway, Illinois, USA, sparks a fascinating discussion, with her question: "What do you think could be the next dominant species after humans, or is it impossible to tell?"
Stuart and William take a balanced view between ethics and knowledge, delving into the complexities of predicting the next dominant species. William argues that it's impossible to determine the future, drawing parallels with the unpredictability of human emergence after the dinosaur extinction event. Stuart, on the other hand, posits that insects, particularly ants, could be the contenders for the next dominant species.
Your hosts explore the distinction between dominance and impact, considering the environmental influence of both humans and insects. They grapple with the "what if" scenario of humanity disappearing overnight and contemplate the unpredictable evolution of life on Earth.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow delve into the pressing questions sent in by listeners. In this special episode, we join forces with The LOAF Podcast, hosted by Lukas Seifert and Oliver Walsh, to tackle the following crucial question sent in by Rory from Darwin, Australia:
“The world has an opportunity to reverse human caused climate change, so why doesn't it?”
Stuart and William kick off the discussion by questioning the feasibility of reversing human-caused climate change, highlighting the historical carbon impact spanning over 150 years. Stuart reflects on the psychological and biological aspects of our species, emphasising the need for intergenerational thinking.
The conversation pivots to the importance of unity among humans, as William argues against the prevalent "us and them" mentality. Stuart proposes that a shift in mindset among business leaders and politicians towards long-term thinking could reshape policies and priorities.
On the other side, Lukas and Oliver from the LOAF Podcast, explore the deceptive comfort provided by greenwashing and superficial environmental efforts. They shed light on the socio-political challenges hindering global environmental initiatives, including the fossil fuel industry's influence on political narratives.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to another episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. Co-hosts, Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, delve into a thought-provoking question, sent in by Gavin from Grove,Oxfordshire, England. Gavin raises concerns about the environmental impact of artificial turf, quoting conflicting statements about its effects on the environment. His question is as follows:
“I’ve heard one commentator say "Fibres from artificial grass make up 15 percent of plastic pieces found in samples of seawater near Barcelona". I heard another commentator say “In the desert many homeowners have switched to artificial turf as a “green” alternative to real grass. Artificial turf has helped to conserve millions of gallons of water in the desert”.
Should it be banned? That is debatable, as there are two sides to every coin. I’m just playing the devil's advocate here. We have to be careful not to demonise things that do not fit our agenda. Others could argue that artificial turf is good for the environment. I think people need to weigh the facts and come to their own conclusions.
Is artificial turf the right choice for me? Is it environmentally responsible for my needs? The answer is very different for different people in different regions. Food for thought folks. Wondered what you guys thought?”
William initiates the conversation by questioning if the key to artificial grass is effective management.
The co-hosts both go on to explore the versatility of artificial turf, with William sharing his positive experience of playing football on improved artificial pitches. Stuart introduces the issue of regular turf replacement due to wear and tear, prompting William to ponder on the ecological responsibility of maintaining and disposing of artificial turf.
Reflecting on Gavin's points, Stuart emphasises the need for the judicious use of artificial turf. The hosts then shift gears to discuss the personal use of artificial grass, critiquing its aesthetics and questioning the motivation behind its adoption.
Does replacing real turf with plastic turf really balance the need for using less water to keep grass alive? Or are we still strangling ourselves as a species, just in a different way, that may not be any better, if not worse?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
“After the Coutts Bank/Nigel Farage scandal, do you think banks have the right to close accounts of people that hold political views they don’t agree with? Ok they were wrong to discuss Mr Farage details with a journalist, but should they be allowed to decide who they do and don’t do business with?” That’s the listener question, this time sent in by Elaine, in Telford, Shropshire, England, which co-hosts Stuart and William will try to unpick.
William understands that the whole issue was that Nigel Farage didn’t have enough money to be able to have a Coutts bank account. He hadn’t heard of it being made political, other than those trying to make it so, because of it being Nigel Farage. William doe’s explore though whether we’re collectively giving the banks too much power, and that surely the bottom line for a bank is, how much money an individual has?
Stuart isn’t sure that this issue was purely a political thing, it’s just that Coutts may have wrongly revealed that he didn’t have enough money to bank with them. Because he’s on the edge, it’s easy to believe that someone made the decision purely based on who he is and what he represents.
Stuart raises the point that shouldn’t all businesses have the right to dictate who they do business with and who they don’t? Are we saying that not all businesses are the same? If a bank is more powerful and corrupt, are, and should the internal ethics and processes be the same as other businesses, or should they be monitored differently?
William raises that maybe it’s all a difference between ethical and legal. He asks the question: how do you balance allowing businesses choices about who they serve and don’t? He himself couldn’t get a Coutts bank account, and asks is this discrimination, or is it just a business choice?
William feels that it was a bad move business wise for Coutts to talk publicly about the situation to a journalist. These types of conversations should be held behind closed doors. He gives the example of the football manager Sir Alex Ferguson, always keeping a lot of the criticism of his players behind closed doors. A difficult discussion would be better done privately and ideally face to face.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
We need to listen twice as much as we talk, that’s the big takeaway from today's episode. Which is the thinking inspired by today’s listener question, sent in by Gavin, in Grove, Oxfordshire, England.
”In life, and whatever culture you are from, should we pause more, and take more moments of reflection, and ask others what their perception is of any given situation, or are we already doing that, and what we should be doing more of is taking action?”
Co-host of this podcast, William, believes it’s always good to pause for reflection, and tries to live by the idea of having two ears and one mouth, so you listen twice as much as you talk. He further raises the point that you need to allow the person you’re speaking to the opportunity to say what they need to say, as you never know what you’ll learn from their words. Lessons come in many forms, and recognizing that is a key life skill.
Your other co-host, Stuart, agrees. He feels we need to pause more, reflect more, appreciate more. We don’t need to change our lives too much though, as many of us already have those foundations in place. They just need solidifying.
He goes on to say it’s not what we do, it’s how we do it. Asking other people’s perception of any given situation, and setting it against your own, is a useful reviewing tool, particularly in dangerous situations. Action comes in many different forms.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience.We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to another thought-provoking episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow delve into the following question from Ramona from Paraguay:“Some Pacific islands are doing deals with mineral and metal extraction companies that could have negative impacts on their indigenous societies, as well as good, as there are financial profits to be made for them, and the companies. Developed countries did this so why shouldn’t these smaller societies?
These same societies are likely to be impacted worst by climate change, potentially caused by other countries in the past, in the form of rising seas levels, flooding, crop failures and forced climate migration of their peoples. Isn’t it a good thing for these extraction companies to be part of the mosaic of solutions needed to combat climate change, as many of the metals they extract, can be reused when products containing them come to the end of their lives, and then made part of the other new items?
Recycling surely! Or maybe you think there’s enough resources in circulation already for us to survive on, and the decision to extract fresh materials as they become needed should be made by a body outside of the extraction companies themselves? Extraction companies left to their own devices could well decide to extract their substances whether or not there's enough already in circulation, before moving on to their next target, so should they really be steering the ship? Further, is there still a place for the oil industry in the mosaic of solutions to combat climate change, or should they be removed from existence entirely?”
Stuart, right from the start, questions why developing countries shouldn't be allowed to extract minerals, emphasising that the challenge lies in our failure to provide them with a better system.
William spotlights a potential future dilemma for smaller countries, wondering if they might be playing catch-up with the world that has already transitioned to greener alternatives. Stuart acknowledges the extractive industry's role in the mosaic of climate change solutions, while William suggests reevaluating the oil industry, by focusing on the valuable skills of its workforce.
As the conversation unfolds, Stuart emphasises the importance of improved recycling practices, and raises critical questions about managing already extracted materials in a rapidly evolving world. The co-hosts discuss the challenges of relying on independent bodies, and acknowledge the difficulty of steering the environmental ship toward a more sustainable future.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow dive into the controversial realm of repatriating cultural artefacts. Prompted by a question from listener Debs from Didcot, Oxfordshire, England.
Debs’ question is as follows:
“There’s lots of talk that artefacts in British museums gained through colonialism centuries ago should be relocated back to their countries of origin. The downside with that is leaving them where they are means more people will see them. Returning them ‘home’ could mean less people see them. What do you think?”
William argues for a straightforward solution: send the artefacts back. His stance is rooted in the belief that these items lack resonance for those without a genuine direct connection to them. Stuart introduces the recent tour in Kenya by King Charles III, where he apologised for British atrocities, prompting a reflection on whether apologies for colonial links can ever truly end.
The conversation deepens as William draws a direct link between the prosperity of the UK and the historical slavery in Jamaica. A connection that fueled the industrial revolution. Stuart advocates for a reimagining of museums and challenges listeners to consider the impact of colonialism on their lives, actions, attitudes, and opportunities.William recommends you to watch a routine by James Acaster, providing a unique perspective on the subject. Watch the routine here.
Stuart leaves listeners with a compelling call to action, urging them to reflect on colonialism's tendrils in their lives and encouraging open conversations, especially for those directly impacted.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow as they delve into a fascinating question, posed by our listener Alivia, from Ridgway, Illinois, USA. Alivia challenges us to consider whether the world is but an illusion, financially bankrupt, and propped up by artificial structures.
Alivia's question: “The world is largely an illusion and bankrupt, because it spends more money than ever exists at any given moment in time. With that knowledge, when one looks at any high street and its parade of shops, it's all artificially propped up. With that knowledge, insurance seems pointless and we’re insuring something that's already dead. Just because a shop's open, it really doesn’t mean it's a viable business. With that knowledge, what do you guys think about the world we live in?”
As Stuart and William unpack Alivia's question, they explore the complexities of the modern economic landscape, the sustainability of businesses, and the perceived illusions that shape our world. Drawing from their unique perspectives, the co-hosts engage in a candid conversation, that challenges conventional wisdom.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, as they embark on the kind of conversation you’d overhear at the pub. This discussion was prompted by a thought-provoking question sent in from listener Alvaro in Spain, which is as follows:
"Do you feel the use of captive trained birds of prey is a good way of dispersing other birds like pigeons and gulls?"
Stuart shares a poignant tale of clashes at a local rubbish tip, revealing the complexities of labelling creatures like gulls and pigeons as vermin
The discussion extends to the root causes — our burgeoning rubbish piles. William questions the true efficacy of using trained birds, while Stuart introduces a compelling analogy: these birds are like brooms, clearing the immediate surroundings. The debate explores whether using these birds is a practical solution, or, just a PR gesture.
The discussion extends to the root causes — our burgeoning rubbish piles. William questions the true efficacy of using trained birds, while Stuart introduces a compelling analogy: these birds are like brooms, clearing the immediate surroundings. The debate explores whether using these birds is a practical solution, or, just a PR gesture.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
“As podcast makers do you feel any kind of responsibility toward your listenership?”
That’s the listener question that's been sent in for discussion in today's episode by Ramona, Paraguay.
William kicks off the conversation by saying that turning up AND being reliably present for the listeners is one way of showing responsibility to the audience. He goes on to talk about how it's important to communicate any changes made in the podcast, for example our new release schedule for 2024.
Also you’d find as a listener if you met co-hosts Stuart and William, that they’re pretty much the people they are on the podcast. They are in some respects caricatures of themselves, as podcast hosting is a performative work.
William hopes they strike a balance between having you, the listener, in the forefront of their minds during recordings, but at the same time challenging themselves, which in turn challenges you as a listener.
So then William feels the responsibility as a podcaster is two fold. One that he and Stuart are careful in what they say, and two, that they still challenge you as a listener by talking honestly.
Stuart raises he and William have a responsibility for what they say, but not how a listener responds. William carries on this point by asking that if anything he and Stuart says triggers a response, get in touch with them, tell them what that response is, and get that conversation going.
Stuart brings up an action: it’s not what you say, it is how you say it.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Do you think Prince Harry spending a reported billion pounds taking the UK press to court is doing society any kind of favours?”
That’s the listener question that’s been sent in by Russ in Harcourt Hill, Oxford, England, for co-hosts Stuart and William to discuss.
William and Stuart start off by talking about what exactly Prince Harry is taking the UK press to court for. William goes onto say that Prince Harry isn’t the only person taking the UK press to court.
Stuart raises how the world of law is expensive and goes on to to talk about how Prince Harry uses the media to help him, but it goes too far the other way. There is some bad journalism out there. He asks whether we drive what journalists produce, or do they drive us?
Stuart finds the question leaves him a bit cold, so the court proceedings might not be relevant to the rest of us. He feels that there’s all kinds of psychology involved in what is motivating Prince Harry to pursue this, and an action for us to take is to maybe explore options outside the court of law. Is that a last resort, and what are the measures before that?
William feels that this case is highlighting that the behaviour of the press needs to be monitored. He sees that would make the press fairer. He further raises that the press know how to create antagonistic headlines to generate an emotional response, to get people to click or buy.
William asks if Russ is asking where the money is coming from? Is it private or public?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
“We have eaten meat for thousands of years, so why is it now so wrong to still eat it?” That's the listener question that's come in for discussion on this podcast from Debs in Didcot, Oxfordshire, England.
William kicks off the episode saying that to him what makes it wrong to eat meat is the exploitation and the industrialisation of the meat production process, together with the devaluing of those animals we consume. He understands why someone would be against using beeswax, as it's taking something from the bees that they actually use. Though he feels using fish in aquaponics doesn't exploit them in the same way as they are there to fertilise the plants whilst being looked after, and usually go to good homes afterwards.
William raises the point of how meat is often seen as needing to be the centre of the dish, but this doesn’t need to be the case. Also it's not always understood how to properly cook certain vegetables either. He concludes by saying that we can feel very threatened by change, and by someone who is different. He encourages us all to engage with that person, and ask them why they do what they do, and be open yourself up to listening.
Stuart asks the questions: how far do we take the idea of not consuming animal products?
He raises that even with high welfare in meat production, there can still be exploitation. He concludes with a good point about your food. Make it as local as it can be whatever you consume, and as good as it can be, and then start to consider the wider ethics.
Announcement Time: This podcast release schedule is altering in 2024 to once a week on a Sunday at 10am UK time. That means Stuart and William will be discussing two questions per episode, instead of one, so the episodes will become longer.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion today? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
“A report produced in the US claimed that if every country went net zero now it would be 250 years before the climate reacted positively. So, should we be doing more than aiming for net zero?” That’s the listener question sent in by Billy, Saugus, Massachusetts, USA.
Co-host William kicks off the conversation by stating that we’ve been putting out a large volume of carbon for decades, and agrees that we should be doing more, or do less, consume less for example. He brings up again that we have been piping out pollution for a very long time, going right back to the beginning of the industrial revolution. He raises the question of what a positive reaction by the climate would actually look like?
Stuart, your other co-host, believes we should always be doing more, but maybe we’ve striven in the wrong areas. He goes on to say it may be too late, and that the world's population will be affected in ways we haven’t even considered yet, and asks that if it is going to take 250 years for the climate to react positively, then it won’t be stable for a number of years.
Stuart throws in there that if we’re going to have to adapt, is that adaptation going to take our eye off the ball for changing? Are we going to keep doing what we’re doing and then adapt to the consequences, or are we going to change?
During this episode it’s mentioned the Wildlife In Everyday Garden Talk Stuart and William are giving for The Flore Gardening Society in Northamptonshire on November 8th at 7.45pm in the Chapel Schoolroom at the Flore United Reformed Church. Details here https://www.floreurc.org.uk/community/garden-society/
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
How do misconceptions about the meat and dairy industries, like the one Suzi shared about cows producing milk because they are pregnant, contribute to the way we view and treat animals in our society?
Listen in to this episode, as your regular hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, joined by Suzi Darrington who once again takes her seat in the listener's chair, as they take a deep but relatable dive into this compelling listener question posed by Nigel in Blackbird Leys, Oxford, England:
"What have Vegans got against eating butter and eggs, or drinking milk? How do those things hurt animals?"
Throughout the episode, Stuart, William, and Suzi explore the complexities of veganism, ethical consumption, and the importance of raising awareness, without alienating individuals.
Among other things they discuss the ethical implications of consuming products meant for other animals' babies, the environmental aspects of different diets, and the ethics surrounding the treatment of animals in the meat industry.
At one point Stuart plays the role of the devil's advocate, prompting a question: should vegans dictate to meat eaters when the production processes of vegan food are not entirely sustainable either?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this engaging episode, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow discuss the following question sent in by Ronny from Denchworth, Oxfordshire, England:
“I saw parts of Charles's and Camila’s coronation, and when they stood on the balcony at Buckingham Palace afterward, both wearing crowns, Camila especially seemed to be waving to the gathered crowds in a very stilted and mechanical way. Is this reflecting how their reign is going to be?”
Stuart takes us on an exploration of consistency, longevity, and reliability as key attributes of a successful monarch, setting the stage for a deep dive into the ever-evolving societal hierarchy. Is there a fundamental human need for a leader, even in isolated cultures?
William poses a profound question: Have we forgotten that, despite our technological advancements, we are still fundamentally animals, driven by instincts and desires?
Stuart wonders about the underlying motivation behind Ronny's question, believing there's a story concealed within.
In conclusion, the co-hosts challenge us to contemplate the value of our daily actions. Is what we do today any significance in the grand scheme of things? With a reflective lens, they ponder the essence of our existence, urging us to unearth the meaning in the mundane. Is it all worth it?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join us for an insightful and engaging exploration of maps, time zones, and their connections to our shared history. Is the centre of the world map a reflection of colonial legacies, or is it a matter of practicality and tradition? Listen in to find out!
This is the podcast where we explore thought-provoking questions from our listeners. In this episode, Debs from Didcot, Oxfordshire, England, sparks a captivating discussion with her question: "Most world maps have the UK at the centre. Is this because of the time zones or a subtle link back to our colonial pasts?"
Your co-hosts, Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, embark on a journey to uncover the complexities of map representation, time zones, and their historical connections.
William kicks off the conversation by highlighting how maybe the centre of a map depends on where you buy it, and how it can vary between an atlas and a map. Stuart directs the focus to world maps, and the relationship between their layout and time zones, suggesting a connection to colonial history.
The discussion delves into the concept of perspective, William speculates on how our perspective could change if viewed from an extraterrestrial standpoint, alluding to common sci-fi and alien invasion depictions.
To add an interactive element, William recommends a practical experiment: turning your phone's map so that south becomes the top. It's a thought-provoking exercise that challenges preconceived notions about map orientation..
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this compelling episode, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow embark on another journey of self-discovery, sparked by a question sent in by listener Derrick from West Hendred, Oxfordshire, England. Derrick’s question is as follows:
“We hear we should live life to the full. What exactly is that? How do we know if we are doing that, or wasting and frittering our lives away?”
Stuart kicks off the conversation by exploring the societal tendency to pass judgement on how others choose to live their lives. This judgement, he notes, often reflects our own internal insecurities and judgements about ourselves.
William chimes in with a personal anecdote, sharing how he's been questioned about his pursuit of learning the Finnish language, despite having no immediate plans to relocate to Finland. He suggests that such pursuits serve as an exercise for the brain, forging new neural connections and pathways, and expanding horizons.
The co-hosts contemplate the idea of a "full life," with William emphasising that it can encompass a myriad of meanings and activities. Stuart delves into the psychology behind our judgments, and the ways they connect to our own self-perceptions.
In conclusion, Stuart underscores the elusiveness of definitive answers, and encourages listeners to reflect on the concept of a full life, and draw their own conclusions.
William's parting advice is to strive to live the best life possible, and to be kind to yourself along the way.
During this episode Stuart mentions the Wildman On Wheel fundraiser, here a link to that fundraiser: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
A short bonus episode this one.
Having listened to a previous episode, listener and collaborator Tommy Serafinski has been in touch.
Tommy and William also collaborated on another podcast series too, Have You Ever Considered?
Have You Ever Considered?“Hey guys, I'm writing as a listener after listening to your recent episode ‘Climate Contradictions’. Indeed the planet can be cooled by dispersing into the atmosphere sulphur dioxide. Of course, there would be some slide effects (for example the sky would be red - seriously, like in the movies) but overall it's quite easy to do. The number of flights required to achieve noticeable cooling of the planet (1 degree, etc) is actually a tiny fraction of what any old commercial airline operates. So the danger is actually that it's too easy to do and some rich nations (Saudis anyone) could decide on their own for the rest of the world to cool down the planet. Apparently, calcium carbonate also could be used for that purpose but I didn't read any deeper analysis about that. You can read about this (and much much more) in this excellent book. https://tommysoutdoors.com/2022/01/11/the-wizard-and-the-prophet-by-charles-c-mann-a-book-review/ If you'd like to buy it - of course use my affiliate link - see, ended up not being entirely disinterested! Cheers, Tommy”.
Stuart raises as an action, that we should read the book which Tommy has recommended.
William suggests that the idea of cooling the climate down, according to conspiracy theorists, is already happening, with the use of what they call chemtrails creating more cloud cover to reflect more of the Sun’s energy back into space.
He raises how we’re in a time where feelings trump facts, and even that some people still wonder if we can really be impacting the climate negatively? Then goes on to talk about the effect of grounding all the flights in the US when 9/11 happened, when the average temperature went up by a degree.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow dive deep again into the world of Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs), addressing a question from long-time listener Hedley Thorne. They were once again joined by Suzi Darrington in the listener’s chair.
Hedley’s question is as follows:
"LTNs, I believe, are a relatively recent invention, and so what has brought about the requirement for them, and what are their positive and negative effects on the local community and businesses?"Low Traffic Neighbourhoods or LTNs have become a hot topic, polarising communities and sparking protests, particularly in the picturesque city of Oxford.Right from the start, Stuart and William tackle the basics of what LTNs are, and why they evoke strong reactions. Special guest Suzi Darrington, a familiar voice in the Listener Chair, joins the conversation once again. The trio discusses the historical use of roadblocks in Oxford, with William shedding light on the fact that LTNs are not a new concept.
Suzi is quick to highlight the positive aspects of life with LTNs, seeing them as a crucial step toward building better public transport links. She also delves into the recent anti-LTN protests in Oxford, and how they are tied to the idea of the 15-minute neighbourhoods. Stuart raises the question of whether this is merely about reinstating local communities. William explores the role of media, and the impact of ingrained habits when it comes to LTNs.
Stuart makes a key point: LTNs aren't banning cars; they're just gently nudging traffic in different directions. Suzi shares her experiences using public transport and cycling around Oxford, highlighting the advantages of reducing car dependency.
William mentions businesses that claim LTNs have caused their closure, but Suzi points out that these neighbourhoods emerged during the COVID pandemic, and there are other factors at play. Stuart calls for transparency, requesting to see the businesses' financial records to gauge the direct impact of LTNs.
William argues that many businesses, not just recently, but for years, have failed to adapt to changing circumstances. Stuart emphasises the significance of location for businesses and suggests that they might need extra assistance in relocating and adapting.
The episode concludes with a discussion about what the council should do. The consensus is to persevere with LTNs, with Suzi highlighting the enthusiasm of the younger generation for addressing the climate crisis and their willingness to embrace change without ingrained habits.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
“We’re brainwashed into thinking we as individuals can save the world, when I’ve heard 7 companies are responsible for most of the carbon humans have ever emitted. Is getting out on the streets and protesting the only answer?” That’s the listener question sent in by Eve, in Haslam, Nottingham, England for co-hosts Stuart and William to explore.Stuarts states right off the bat that there is never just one singular answer to anything. We’re distracted at times by the big corporations, it's true, and we can feel pressured into doing things as individuals, which can take the onus away from the big companies to do anything themselves. The big quandary we have is that there really needs to be a big change in how we all live, but how on earth do we go about that?Stuart’s conclusion is that street protests are one but not the only answer. We need to do our best to transition in as many ways as possible, because it’s very hard to change the wind of change when they’re coming at it from many different routes.
William is amazed by who owns and influences what, and what one company owns when you drill down. For example, Goodreads is run by Amazon, and how many breakfast cereals does Pepsi have a stake in? It’s very difficult to avoid the 7 companies that Eve has alluded to, as their tentrills are everywhere, so is protest the only answer William inquires? Yes, in a way, but there are many ways to protest.Stuart elaborates on this point, for example abstaining from using a particular product is an act of protest. You can protest by just talking about it, and by keeping it in the public eye and not letting it get buried.
An action your co-hosts came up with for this particular episode is to try to seek balance, but also not sticking with the status quo either.
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Suzi Darrington is once again sat in the ‘Listener’s Chair’ alongside Stuart and William for this listener question from Ronny, in Denchworth, Oxfordshire, England.
“Are young people's perception of reality distorted by the cultural influences of their preferred social media platforms?”
Suzi talks about the different phones she had when younger, saying her first smartphone was at the age of 12. Her generation grew up with social media, and has always had it as a big part of her life. She’s never had a phone that didn’t have social media on it. In the past you’d have to dedicate time to social media, she now carries it around in her back pocket. This makes her feel a bit trapped, but acknowledges she puts it on herself. The conclusion is social media is an addiction, it taps into addictive behaviours, similar to how fruit machines entice people.
The next generation are getting much shorter form content, that’s more addictive, and Suzi can see how this kind of content could shape views. There's a growing community of men who hate women, with the social media world reshaping reality. Suzi delves into the reality of how these men hate women, and how they look up to individuals who perpetuate those thoughts. Her conclusion is that she’d need to be really self aware to fully understand the impact Instagram has had on her, with the content being so clean and saturated. She feels Instagram has placed a pressure on how she looks and gives her an unrealistic expectation of reality. Even the content that’s supposed to show reality, itself has been curated and selected.
Social media has a bigger influence on her when she isn’t busy. When she’s got things to do, she uses it less. After re-reading the question Suzi talks about how each social media platform has a different feeling, and in fact over her lifetime these platforms have changed.
Material that is against what you believe is pushed to you just to get a reaction, as it keeps engagement on that platform’ It engenders arguments, which in turn distorts people’s perception of reality. Suzi feels that social media is heading towards more short form content, more outrage, trying to keep people on the platforms as much as possible. Consuming, commenting, reacting.
Tik Tok has been accused of causing frenzies of activity, and yes, social media can be a great place to connect, but a bad place to feel you truly belong.
William raises an action we can all consider is to do nothing, and feel comfortable with being bored, and to change the word to want rather than to need. We need to stop filling our time with ‘stuff’ and activity, and spend time actively just sitting and being.
Stuart asks where this kind of thinking and behaviour is going? Both he and William lived before the advent of social media, which prompts Suzi to ask what they actually did with their time.
They just got on with life!
During this episode this fundraiser is mentioned, check it out https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Regular co-hosts Stuart and William are joined by Suzi Darrington. an Oxford University Crankstart Intern with them in the summer, who returns to the ‘Listener’s Chair’ to give her two pennies worth and because this question really resonated with her. She will be back again in future episodes. The following question came from listener Derrick, in West Hendred, Oxfordshire, England.
“Should landlords be demonised as they are after all providing homes. Even if they put the prices of rents up too much though and no one can afford them, the homes are still there though, and could be turned into AirB&B’s?”
Is the core of this issue how we look at renting and home ownership? Stuart compares the property ladder to a pyramid scheme: people jump on this ladder believing they’ll make money but that horse has bolted. He says people don’t like moving and mentions the north/south divide as well as the unfair distribution of property in the UK. The North East has a lot of empty houses because the population has moved out. How can we get people to move to places that have a surplus of housing, and make it fair? Also, the social housing that building companies should create often falls short of the target. How can we change that?
William feels a home is a sanctuary where you feel safe, not a transient place you just exist in. He mentions how the major UK supermarkets were pulled up by the government for potentially profiteering from the cost of living crisis. Are landlords profiteering too? He says we need more equality and a wide variety of properties, particularly affordable rental places. The social housing stock is low, and the bar to be eligible for a home is high. William compares going up the property ladder with going up in society. He asks where the drive for homeownership in the UK comes from. He and Stuart conclude that it goes way back. We live on a crowded island and are protective of our property. William cites the episode with guest Heli Paulasto where the discussion was framed around the different attitudes around the right to roam between Finland and the UK. He points out that in the past large housing estates were built, e.g. in Glasgow, with no amenities, and that it still happens with housing projects today. He goes on to raise the idea of the 15-minute city.
Suzi looks at the sinister side of all of this. We appear to be shifting in attitude towards a more privatised service industry in every aspect. She believes we have an obsession with ownership, an unachievable dream particularly for the younger generation. She asks is the desire to own our own home a reflection of sovereignty and is this baked into the British character?
They conclude with a conversation around why people move or stay, the mistrust of immigration, and the impact of air b&bs.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
“We seem to be cycling less since Covid. Councils really encouraged us to cycle more during the lockdowns, but it seems to be they too easily undo the pro-cycling measures when anti-cycling issues are raised by motorists and others?”.
That’s today's listener question up for discussion, sent in by Rob from East Lockinge, Oxfordshire, England.
We always give an ad free experience on this podcast. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
As someone who cycles himself, co-host William believes that the Oxford City Council are at least trying to be more cycle friendly. He doesn’t label himself as a cyclist but more as someone who cycles. Using a bike is just one method he uses to get around the city.
William feels that the Oxford City Council are more pro cycling. He wonders if the perspective of this question sent in by Rob, in a rural area, shows the trend in the countryside, where again more people were potentially cycling during the lockdown and have gone back to driving more now that we are back to more “normal times”.
As far as William is aware, bus usage levels haven’t recovered since COVID, and he believes that overall, COVID has had a major effect on all our lives, particularly how we travel around. Maybe more people are now opting for the car, which can feel like a safer environment than going back to public transport.
Co-host Stuart raises that during COVID he became aware that more sections of the road were being given to cyclists, and maybe those are now being removed in some areas. He goes on to suggest that potentially more people are now taking the bus or driving, rather than cycling, but also that he knows people who picked up the cycling habit during COVID which they’ve kept up.
He feels that to explore this topic more, we need maybe a local councillor, as this debate is bigger than he and William. William wonders though whether a councillor would want to be a guest on the podcast, as their words are always picked apart by people.
Stuart suggests that what has changed is that many people’s lives are busy again, so it could just appear that people are cycling less. This whole idea needs to be monitored fully to really find out the answer to this question.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
In another thought-provoking episode of The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow dive deep into another discussion, prompted by a question from listener Gavin, from Grove, Oxfordshire, England.
The question Gavin poses is:
”In the UK there are governmental subcommittees reviewing the benefits and costs of decisions made around the Covid-19 science during the pandemic in the UK. Its hard to do this when using hindsight as the decisions our government and other world governments made were done in real time, with less information. If decisions had been made with the benefit of the hindsight we’d have now, would the experience have been any better? Is this review an impossible task?”
Stuart kicks off the conversation by reflecting on the Scottish government's response to the pandemic, pointing out that criticisms have emerged, suggesting a need for a more people-focused approach, rather than just infection rate-focused decisions. He highlights the inherent challenge governments face in real-time assessments of the impact of their choices on the public and emphasises the importance of proactive support measures.
However, William provides a fresh perspective, shifting the conversation from what should have been done to, what we can and should do in the future. He acknowledges the value of hindsight, but also its limitations, arguing that the review is a vital tool for shaping responses to future pandemics.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow as they mark the onset of Black History Month, which kicks off on October 1st.
Black History Month is a time to honour, celebrate, and reflect upon the profound impact of Black individuals on our local, national and international history and culture.
Find out more by going to https://www.blackhistorymonth.org.uk
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow in this thought-provoking episode, sparked by a question from listener, Rob from East Lockinge, Oxfordshire, England. Focusing on the world of museum culture, they delve deep into the complex issue of artefact ownership, colonialism's lingering legacy, and the stories we choose to tell. The question sent in by Rob is as follows:
“British museums could ultimately close if they start returning artefacts and exhibits obtained due to colonisation? It could be the thin end of the wedge with loads more things being returned to their original cultural owners. If the floodgates are opened institutions like Cambridge University could also be returning stolen colonial treasure as it were, that they use for educational purposes.
Even though there's no law enforcing the return of items, it is perhaps a good time to really progress this, especially as more new requests are coming in from the original owners. Do you feel telling the story of these items is best done collaboratively and fairly? Not in a protectionist approach that risks distorting the item's story and its cultural relevance now, today?”
During this episode Stuart reminds us of the profound impact of colonialism on the industrial revolution, and on the very fabric of society in the UK, and how confronting this history is essential for finding answers to the questions posed. He asks, who do these collections of items in museums really serve? We need to be telling the whole story, including the good and the bad.
William delves into the significance of understanding the origins of these items and the permissions granted for their display. Is an item's educational value determined by its backstory and the care taken in its presentation? What lies at the heart of a museum's mission?
As always this podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
How can we discern genuine eco-friendly intentions from greenwashing in large businesses, and is it inevitable that there will always be a level of suspicion when it comes to their environmental efforts and motives? Are we, as a society, at a point where we can still make choices to change our future, or have we already passed the point of no return in addressing pressing environmental issues, like E-waste?
Join co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow in yet another thought-provoking episode, as they delve into the complex world of E-waste, and its environmental implications.
This conversation was sparked by the following question from Derrick, West Hendred, Oxfordshire, England:
“E-Waste is growing 3 times faster than the population. Eyes roll when we’re told big business is going sustainable as it's just out to make money. I feel though we need to urgently decouple growth and enviro sustainability, for them and us, it's not an either or. Perhaps enviro sustainability can still mean growth, just not as much? Some even say Hydrogen fuels are a distraction, but it does seem to fill a gap that electricity can’t access. Maybe hybrid fueling is the way forward for business, consumers and us?”
As the discussion unfolds, the hosts delve deep into the human condition, the potential for meaningful change, and whether we have already crossed the point of no return in shaping our livable future. Stuart even presents a unique analogy, suggesting that human society resembles a multi-level marketing business, or even a pyramid scheme.
Stuart introduces the idea of the reusability of lithium, while William highlights the challenge of discerning genuine eco-friendly intentions from greenwashing in businesses. The conversation takes a philosophical turn, exploring the concept of growth, not just in terms of monetary wealth, but as personal and human development. They also ponder whether humanity is on a collision course with its own demise, akin to an evolutionary dead-end like the Giant Panda finds itself in.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Who truly sets the standards for how countries should behave, and can we influence change without imposing our beliefs on others? Are bans on countries with societal unfairness hosting major events a solution, or does it inadvertently create echo chambers and hide underlying issues?
In this thought-provoking episode, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow engage in a candid conversation, sparked by a question from listener, Kate in Rowstock, Oxfordshire, England, whose question is as follows:
“A workman on my roof was shouting his views to his work colleagues the other day, do you agree with him? He said (and I’ve edited out his prolific swear words, 3 in one sentence at times. Not much room left for what he was saying!)
During the football world cup in 2022 players and the sport were politicising the event by ramming the rainbow and gay rights down our throats. Some countries frown upon homosexuality, and that should be respected. Protest brings about change but is using sport that way a step too far?
Surely the debate is better maintained by banning countries hosting and competing in these events if they have unfairness in their society, like Qatar does? Or will that push discrimination underground?
Who decides if another countries views are wrong? Many powerful countries who criticise others have rules others don’t like either so are they really purer than pure?
Surely dialogue and reason is the way to go? Although if we want diversity why do we hit countries over the head because of extreme beliefs? Gay, women, abortion, its all hypocritical. No culture is right but are we talking about fairness?”
Stuart kicks things off by sharing his observations on profanity and intelligence, suggesting that there's more to it than meets the eye. William then raises the important question of cultural relativism, challenging our preconceived notions about what's right and wrong on a global scale. They both agree that timing plays a crucial role in using platforms like sporting events to protest effectively.
Stuart emphasises the need to confront and engage with beliefs different from our own, while William suggests a practical approach of questioning the origins and motivations behind people's opinions, to facilitate meaningful dialogue. Every country has beliefs that other countries don’t have, don't agree with. For example the UK largely deny how things are connected with colonialism.
Stuart believes there is a lot of homophobia that is wrapped up in pretend acceptance, and he feels that is why we haven’t moved on as a world society.
This episode is a reminder that meaningful change begins with dialogue, and no disagreement has ever been resolved without people discussing and challenging their beliefs.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
A slightly surreal episode, not the first, won’t be the last, as co-hosts Stuart and William tackle today's listener question, which is from George, in Upton, Oxfordshire, England.
“Actress Kate Winslet has stated she feels the government should tighten up the online bill in the UK, to protect vulnerable users. Celebrity chef Jamie Oliver ran a campaign to improve school dinners. Then there was the Blackpool Football Club player who came out and announced he was gay last year. Should those with influence use their voice to raise issues, or stay quiet? Those that dislike them, rarely seem to listen to anything they say anyway. Maybe even turning away from issues because of who has raised them?!”
William raises, right off the bat, how he and Stuart know someone who detests Jamie Oliver. Stuart tells the story that the person referred to was quite happy to accept bad school dinners for his kids, just so he didn’t have to say that Jamie Oliver was right about the appalling state of them.
William points out that you often see a person’s true motivation by presenting them with silence, as they are often expecting a reaction to what they’re saying if its slightly controversial.
Stuart discusses that if you are going to use your voice to influence others, you need to choose your battles wisely. It also needs to be at the right time. Those that dislike certain celebrities rarely listen to what they have got to say, which needs to be dismissed, you just need the critical mass to absorb the message. It’s not about speaking up, it’s not about staying quiet, it’s about speaking up and staying quiet at the right time. Sometimes silence says more than speaking.
Stuart further raises that different audiences need different role models, different messages, different language, different vocabulary, different approaches. There isn’t anybody who shouldn’t speak up.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
During this episode Stuart and William talk about the WOW Effect / Wildman On Wheels where we are raising £24,000 to help fund two wheelchairs enabling Stuart to continue bringing nature into the daily lives of others, sharing a lifetime of outdoor wisdom.
Here is a link to that fundraiser: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Through the Wow Effect (Wildman On Wheels) we aim to show that even if you have a green space you can enjoy within 15 minutes of where you live, is that space really accessible if you are in a wheelchair or have another disability and can't get in when you arrive? We want to reframe the understanding of accessible countryside.
So on to today's listener question sent in by Francis, in Blewbury, Oxfordshire, England, and Stuart and William set about answering it.
“The inner voice that we all have, is what it says fact?”
Stuart raises right off the bat that the inner voice says isn’t fact, and that opinions are just passing momentary consciousness. It’s not fact, it is just your opinion at that point in time. So, if the inner voice is a series of thoughts, and a set of electrical impulses, can there ever be a time when what we think can ever be interpreted as fact?
He further raises that we get confused with when our brain is processing stuff, and then assuming that that it is a good barometer of what we think, and we feel at any given point. In the long run little of that really means anything. It is however the actions that come from these thoughts and processes that can be damaging or positive, it's up to us.
William goes on to say that at all times of the day, he believes, your brain is trying to make sense of the world around you, and it tries this by thought, so he agrees with Stuart that the inner voice isn’t fact. William always tries to take his inner thoughts as another person talking to him. He can then choose whether he engages with it, or not. Sometimes it is a good idea to allow these thoughts to flow through you, as they can be irrelevant, they can be harmful.
Stuart concludes by asking are we stuffed because we’re trying to bring meaning to something that isn’t really there? So maybe there is no meaning to the inner voice? He does go on to say that the inner voice should not be totally ignored. It comes back to the balance we should seek in our lives. Balance and measure.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Todays listener question for Stuart and William to explore has been set by Cedric, in East Hagbourne, Oxfordshire, England
“Who is in charge of the internet, or is it multiple players?”
William believes that nobody is in charge of the internet, and that the internet is a mesh of networks, with gatekeepers, for example the internet providers.
William marvels though at the fact the internet allows seamless communication.
Stuart on the other hand believes that someone invented it, people own aspects of it, certain people manipulate it in certain ways, but questions who’s in charge? Hasn’t it gone beyond ownership now?
Stuart asks where the internet is, and what exactly is it? What freaks him out is there are massive cables under the ocean, but with the internet becoming more and more wireless, will all those cables currently in use be dumped, and just left to litter the ocean floor? It’s the same disposal habits over and over again.
William’s action for the episode is to think about how you use the internet, and Stuart’s is to take your rubbish home with you.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Yet another question for co-hosts Stuart and William to explore today, sent in by regular listener Molly, from Oxford, England
“Now King Charles 3rd has to talk, behave and guide from a non-political place, will all his good work dealing with the climate and ecological crisis be lost? Or were plans put in place for Charles’s work to continue once he became King? Maybe though you feel that although King Charles has to step away from some of the good causes he was involved with during his time as Prince Of Wales, he may now be able to provide a new space for people to come together and discuss the big issues, which could be how he makes the role as King his own, and differentiates his reign from his mothers?”
Stuart raises that King Charles, now he’s monarch, has to in theory, guide in a non-political way, which maybe he didn’t do before. He seems like a person who thinks about things on a pretty deep level. Stuart feels it's perhaps a shame for him to come to the throne so late in his life.
There’s a concern for some people that all his work and influence dealing with the climate and ecological crisis could be lost? Stuart points out that though he’s stepping away from good causes, he’s 75 years old, so was most likely already stepping away anyway.
Stuart feels that with Charles being king, he can potentially take these subjects to places maybe other monarchs haven’t? For example he recently spoke about the Windrush generation and had a celebration about that. You wouldn’t necessarily have seen this during Elizabeth’s time. Or would you?
William points out the obvious aspect that he’s a very different monarch to his Mother because we know him better than we did Elizabeth. We’ve heard a lot more about what he’s thinking, so William asks how much will be diluted because Charles is now monarch? William mentions that it’s going to be a long time till we have a young monarch again.
An action Stuart comes up with is that everything, whatever it is, should be bigger than just one person. It is a weak point if it isn’t.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Trigger Warning: The topic suicide is discussed in this episode. If this is a subject that you find difficult to listen to, then this might not be the episode for you right now.
The second part of this particular episode will be released exclusively on our Patreon page for our Earth Hero and Beyond Stereotype backers.
On 5th of October 2022 we released Leons Law [TW] followed by Taking His Life [TW] on February 14th 2023. In the February episode Stuart and William discussed the following question from Alex in Poland:
“Not listened to your podcast in a long long time, but nice to see you are still going. I see I’ve got a lot of listening to catch up on. Could you discuss the serious subject of male suicide and its potential hidden threat?”
That followup episode prompted a listener of the podcast to contact us as they expressed concerns about the handling of the sensitive topic of male suicide. The listener felt that the episode lacked sensitivity and could be harmful to those dealing with the discussed issues.
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William, with the listener’s feedback in mind, reexamine the Taking His Life episode. As they always say in every episode, they’re not experts, but two people who aren’t afraid to express their opinions, and also to have those opinions challenged and changed.
For this episode Stuart and William were also joined by Oxford University Crankstart student intern Suzi Darrington, who shares her thoughts on the original episodes, and how Stuart and William handled the subject.
If you like to find out more information about this subject, here is a list of online resources that you may find helpful:
- Calm https://www.thecalmzone.net/
- David Kessler https://grief.com/
- Global Retreat Centre https://www.globalretreatcentre.org/
- The Oxford Mindfulness Foundation https://www.oxfordmindfulness.org/
- Mind https://www.mind.org.uk/
- Rethink https://www.rethink.org/
- Self-Compassion https://self-compassion.org/
- Survivors of Bereavement by Suicide https://uksobs.org/
- Zero Suicide Alliancehttps://www.zerosuicidealliance.com/
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
In the context of large organisations like the FA and major event organisers, how can we differentiate between genuine environmentally responsible actions, and the selective use of data to create a facade of carbon neutrality?
Co-hosts, Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, along with a special guest who's gracing the ‘listeners' chair for the last time (for now), Oxford University Crankstart student, Suzi Darrington. To get in touch with Suzi you can find her on LinkedIn.
The inspiration for today's discussion comes from the following question, posed by Mary in Gorse Hill, Swindon, Wiltshire:
“The Football World Cup in 2022 held in Qatar, was said by the FA to be the most carbon neutral championship ever. Running on solar power and having electrified transport in the area seems to have been the foundation of their calculation. What about all the wider businesses servicing this event? Were they carbon neutral or was this pushed under the carpet? For example, were the hotels used by fans run on sustainable grounds? What about all the flights getting fans there across the world?
I’ve heard though they didn’t factor in all the elements involved in running the event, rather they cherry picked the data to falsely make it look like we were moving in the right direction. I also heard one pundit say the reality was this was the most carbon impactful event ever run by humanity, outside of wars. Are we having the wool pulled over our eyes in the pursuit of carbon neutrality?”
The discussion pivots to the façade of carbon neutrality maintained by large entities like the FA. Stuart questions how we can truly discern whether their actions are environmentally responsible amidst fierce competition. William chimes in, questioning whether the carbon footprint of constructing stadiums for events like the Qatar World Cup was even considered.
Drawing from personal experiences, William and Suzi shine a light on how these organisations often cherry-pick data to paint a greener picture than reality. Stuart, ever the sceptic, wonders if we're all falling prey to deception in the pursuit of carbon neutrality.
During this episode Stuart and William talk about the WOW Effect / Wildman On Wheels where we are raising £24,000 to help fund two wheelchairs enabling Stuart to continue bringing nature into the daily lives of others, sharing a lifetime of outdoor wisdom.
Here is a link to that fundraiser: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Through the Wow Effect (Wildman On Wheels) we aim to show that even if you have a green space you can enjoy within 15 minutes of where you live, is that space really accessible if you are in a wheelchair or have another disability and can't get in when you arrive? We want to reframe the understanding of accessible countryside.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, along with Oxford University Crankstart student Suzi Darrington, in her penultimate appearance in the listener’s chair, in a thought-provoking episode that dips heavily into philosophy.
The trio delve into the following question posed by listener Jon from Cowley, Oxford England:
“Too many people seem to be focusing on growth as the pathway out of the downturn in many of the world economies, but that seems to have its limits. All solutions do though don’t they?
For example the UK government has been offering sections of the community financial support to help with increasing heating and cost of living bills, but this is short termism and just plugging the gap with a sticking plaster losing its adhesion. Surely it's better to insulate peoples homes so they don’t need as much energy to heat them in the first place, instead of the population using more and more energy unchecked, and then trying to sustain that? Societal aspirations alongside need to be simpler though, and instead of us feeling it's our right to own a house, have a posh car, have expensive holidays, and live more and more in a disposable way if we so wish.
We need to stop the self talk of having and consuming less being considered a retrograde step. We need to change our collective value set and just strive for what we really need, the rest is a distraction. To keep striving, unchecked, means our lives need more capital to sustain it, so if we had more sustainable aspirations instead we’d all be more resilient to the ups and downs of the economy, and be able to support the most vulnerable better. Perpetual growth isn’t the holy grail, and one isn’t part of the Anti Growth Coalition just by looking at alternatives.
I’m not saying we should go back to living in trees or becoming fully nomadic again, but by mixing how the indigenous cultures of the world live, and our own culture, I’m sure we can find the best of both worlds, without losing any of the cultures. By living smarter might bring about growth and higher profits but we reject that for perpetual growth, but it would be more likely to be sustainable growth and profits”.
Stuart and William approach the topic with their signature candidness, discussing the limitations of growth on a planet with finite resources. As Suzi points out though, the pursuit of growth has led to both improved living standards and increased inequality. Suggests that perhaps growth has run its course, that potentially we’re done with what growth has offered us. The discussion touches on diverse perspectives, from the aspiration culture to the potential for a more equitable society.
The conversation evolves into a debate about the viability of equalising society when those in power are invested in maintaining their status. Can long-term solutions thrive in a world of short-term political cycles? The hosts reflect on actionable steps for change, emphasising the importance of valuing experiences over possessions, and asking critical questions before making purchases.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow, as they dive into a mind-bending discussion with guest Suzi Darrington, an Oxford University Crankstart student, who takes a seat in the listener's chair for this intriguing episode. The trio delve deep into the surreal world of conspiracy theories, triggered by a thought-provoking question from listener Molly in Oxford, England, who’s question is as follows:
“Do you think the fashion for conspiracy theories is getting out of hand and what drives that? I see there is a conspiracy campaign stating that the Manchester Arena bombings were staged. With no-one killed and all the injured actually acting. I see one guy who was paralysed in the attack is being targeted on Twitter, with someone even filming him to try and prove it's all make believe. This led to victims being targeted by trolls and stalkers who buy into the conspiracy bollocks, and it could easily escalate with peoples lives being threatened.
Maybe this whole existence thing is a scam though, maybe Twitter is all an illusion, maybe this podcast is a figment of our imagination, maybe the world is flat and we are being ruled by Aliens, and maybe those idiots who believe in conspiracy theories are just computer generated players in a childish computer game being played by aliens who live at the centre of the Sun? Sorry, feeling sarcastic!!!
People have access to alternative media now and want something away from the mainstream. Does that open the vulnerable up to weird conspiracy suggestions, even if they think they are strong minded. I think this conspiracy fashion reveals that biologically humanity hasn’t evolved much at all for thousands of years. We might be evolving technology wise, but intellectually I despair”.
In this episode, the hosts examine the ever-growing influence of conspiracy theories in today's world. Suzi kicks things off by noting how these theories are finding a foothold in mainstream discourse. She explores the correlation between the rise of conspiracy theories and the pay-for-privileges trend on Twitter. This, she suggests, amplifies these ideas, creating a deceptive illusion of widespread belief.
William contributes by highlighting the role of YouTube's algorithm in perpetuating the popularity of topics like flat earth theory. Stuart shares his personal YouTube experience, puzzling over the algorithm's mysterious connections—or lack thereof—between recommended content and his interests.
Suzi draws parallels to the past, recounting the Gamergate phenomenon where gaming content led young boys into misogynistic content. The episode unpacks how such content acts as a gateway to more extremist ideologies, often fueled by the 'manosphere' and the cult of alpha males.
Stuart raises a critical point: can the entire blame be placed on algorithms? William concurs, highlighting the longstanding existence of conspiracy theories. As the hosts navigate these complex topics, they analyse how these theories can drive wedges in societies, and prey on the susceptible.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Step into the latest episode of the podcast as co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow are once again joined by Oxford University Crankstart student Suzi Darrington. They unpack the intricacies of sustainable practices and distribution in the context of a fascinating listener question from Trevor at Wood Farm, Oxford, England. Trevor’s question is:
“I see a company has popped up in The Cotswolds that recycles fishermen's nets etc. Would it be more sustainable if this popped up on the coast somewhere?”
Stuart kickstarts the debate by spotlighting the complex web of sustainability. He highlights how the carbon footprint is associated with transporting products inland, and challenges the notion of solely focusing on the company's location.
William chimes in, expanding on Stuart's observation, suggesting that for sustainability to thrive, these recycling facilities would need to be present in every coastal port. He introduces the concept of carbon-neutral distribution and explores how controlling the movement of goods could revolutionise sustainability efforts.
Suzi lends her voice to the discourse, advocating a balanced view of sustainability. She praises the positive impact of any recycling initiative and highlights the significant volume of waste that isn't currently being recycled.
Stuart turns his attention to the mathematical side of sustainability, suggesting that as time passes, if this can’t be done at every fishing port, an inland location might lead to reduced transportation emissions due to its equidistant centralised nature.
William Mankelow draws parallels between sustainable distribution in this context and the carbon emissions associated with the last leg of supermarket shopping.
Suzi urges listeners not to overstate transportation's carbon impact in the grand scheme of things. She highlights that while transportation does play a role, other industries have far more damaging consequences.
William raises that this company should be applauded for existing in the first place, which on the whole Suzi and Stuart agree with.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Oxford University Crankstart Intern Suzi Darrington, is once again in the Listeners Chair. This is the fourth of eight episodes where she’ll reside in that seat.
Many say we bounce around subjects on this podcast, but you listeners guide us in the direction you want us to take the conversations, with the questions you send. Most come back to the environment, although it's not always obvious.
The podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Steve in Bredbury, Stockport, Greater Manchester, England, is back with another question: “How can we find a solid economic future without destroying the ecosystems on which we rely? Hospitals are really struggling with the current model that just isn’t working. I heard one trust that runs hospitals in Bournemouth and Poole has seen their energy costs rise from 4m last year to a projected 14 million next year. Should bodies like hospitals be supported outside of the economic systems we rely on, or is it impossible to do that, with the outside still actually being within the system?”
Suzi believes we should have an economy designed with people and environment in mind, rather than for just profit. This should be the foremost purpose of the economy. A donut style economy is designed to make us happy rather than to make profit. It’s designed within the planet’s boundaries. She feels that for real change to happen, people’s attitudes need to change, as many are living the neo liberal lie, believing that problems will sort themselves out.
Suzi brings up inelastic goods, which are items people need to live, such as water, or fuel for their vehicles. Then wonders if there’s a split between the younger and older generations, where the former are more sympathetic to the cause, whereas the older generation cling to the idea that the free market’s hand will sort everything out? She isn’t trying to make a blanket statement here though that young people get it and older people don’t. Suzi says most people think the NHS is a great thing, even though it’s currently struggling, and wouldn’t want a private solution. Though it isn’t unimaginable that the whole system could change completely.
William raises how a hospital is a vital service that everyone should have universal access to, that should be funded more centrally. Certain services, like the NHS and railways, should be run outside of these systems, as they are an amenity for everyone.
Stuart mentioned we discussed the donut economy in a past episode. Here’s a link to that concept https://www.kateraworth.com/doughnut/ A donut economy is a very good idea, however, it doesn’t give an agreed clear and defined pathway yet to where we want to end up. There’s a meeting in Oxford in September 2023 by the Oxfordshire Donut Economy Collective, aiming to address that though. More details here https://www.oxfordshiredoughnut.org.uk/ Is it a dream to think hospitals can be funded outside of the usual systems? Is there an alternative just for the medical profession? He mentions his grandfather always said that none of the essential services should be privately owned as you’re then just held to ransom.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like discussed? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view, support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Crankstart Intern Suzi Darrington from Oxford University, who's with us for six weeks, is in the Listeners Chair. This is the third of eight episodes where she will reside in that seat.
Listener Heather in Ablington, Wiltshire, England, sent in the following question for discussion today:
“Some companies are suggesting climate protesters should actually go and work for them and help them be more sustainable, which is what many companies say they want to be. Is this an honest attempt at bringing in fresh energy and ideas to improve internal sustainability, or a cynical attempt at silencing protest?”
Suzi believes it's a cynical effort to stifle protest. For instance, if someone opposes the fossil fuel industry and is invited by someone within that sector to collaborate for improvement, it undermines the initial stance that the industry should cease to exist.
Moreover, suggesting that protestors' actions have minimal impact, and that joining the protested company would be more effective, often comes across as insincere. Companies frequently don't follow through on such offers, merely creating noise. Hiring individuals capable of creating real change, who are likely more skilled than protesters, would be more meaningful.
Suzi also delves into how protesters lobby governments for regulations on these companies, as opposed to relying on the free market. The free market, driven solely by profit, won't address social and environmental concerns. Suzi questions if a global agreement on regulations is necessary, as shifting a company to another country due to regulatory disagreements isn't always straightforward.
She introduces an action: reevaluating our perception and dialogue about protestors. Is the inconvenience they cause comparable to the existential threat of climate change?
William notes protesters' varied backgrounds and the risk of internal disruption if they infiltrate organizations.
He discusses legislative vulnerabilities. Companies seek lax regulations abroad if local ones are restrictive. Suzi agrees. William questions global legislation.
Stuart states that in some industries it is a cynical attempt, but can’t a polluting industry be allowed to become sustainable? If so, why wouldn’t it do that by employing people that were formally protesters? Stuart is playing devil’s advocate in this episode. He suggests there’s room to bring in fresh blood to make all these industries sustainable, and shouldn’t the most polluting companies be allowed to adapt, or should we be getting rid of them? There are protesters out there that are calling for the fossil fuel industries to end now, when some of those companies could alter what they sell, as well as already having the infrastructure and staff we need to make the mass transitions we need.
Stuart, William and Suzi all agree when it comes to the fossil fuel industry, there needs to be a serious reduction. Will we ever reach a point where we won’t have a fossil fuel industry though?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Do you enjoy photography? Did you know that today, the 19th August, is World Photography day?
The primary objective of the day is to spark positive transformations globally, fostering connections among individuals and promoting awareness through the powerful medium of photography.
You can find out more, and how to get involved yourself through the following website:https://www.worldphotographyday.com/
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Crankstart Intern Suzi Darrington from Oxford University, with us for 6 weeks, is in the Listeners Chair. This is the second of 8 episodes where she'll reside in that seat.
Today's listener question from Ash in Icomb, Gloucestershire, England reads, “I read that the clothing industry produces 10% of the world's carbon emissions, and some say this is more than the combined totals of the shipping and aviation industries. Which industry should we be focusing on to combat man's impact on the climate?”
William raises the question of who controls the switches behind processes propping up all industries? He feels having read this question and explored it through the conversation here, an action we can all take is to consume less throughout all aspects of life.
Suzi brings up that there are higher polluting industries, such as fossil fuel industries. She raises that the area in our lives we can all make what at least feels like a tangible difference is the clothing industry, because we have control over the clothes we buy, and the things we consume in general. She feels fast fashion is really bad for the environment, and discusses that the younger generations have partial responsibility when it comes to fashion, as they’re the group that consume most, as it’s part of who they are, and it’s also a time of figuring out who they are.
Stuart, on the other hand, thinks we all need to get our houses into order and brings the conversation back to the question by stating that we need to focus on all industries, but the effort in certain industries needs to be higher. The key industries include fashion, energy production, the aviation industry, and maybe you can think of more. Stuart talks about an article about the “right to drive” which he contests as it isn’t exactly a right if we are tested and given permission to do it. He also wonders why people want the right to do it when there's so much congestion and legislation around it.
Stuart, William and Suzi then get into a conversation about the idiosyncrasies of the aviation industry, including empty flights and private planes.
During this episode Stuart and William talk about the WOW Effect / Wildman On Wheels where we are raising £24,000 to help fund two wheelchairs enabling Stuart to continue bringing nature into the daily lives of others, sharing a lifetime of outdoor wisdom.
Here is a link to that fundraiser: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Through the Wow Effect (Wildman On Wheels) we aim to show that even if you have a green space you can enjoy within 15 minutes of where you live, is that space really accessible if you are in a wheelchair or have another disability and can't get in when you arrive? We want to reframe the understanding of accessible countryside.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Crankstart Intern Suzi Darrington from Oxford University, who's with us for 6 weeks, is in the Listeners Chair. This is the first of 8 episodes where she will reside in that seat.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. We don’t talk about the countryside as much as we used to as listener questions take us off into all sorts of different areas that are all worth considering.
Today's listener's question, from Peter in Ostergotland, Sweden, led to a conversation around what is it to be Russian as it is a very vast country, with a lot of different ethnicities? Behind it all though isn’t it true that ultimately we’re all the same?
Peter’s question runs as follows:
“Putin, the President of Russia drafted loads of male reservists to help in the Ukrainian war, yet it seems large amounts were targeted through this process amongst the minority groups in some far flung parts of Russia. Is this a hidden technique and a hidden form of ethnic cleansing within his own country, with the aim to assimilate everyone to look, sound and behave like he wants, who won’t rebel. Or is this a valid recruitment process?”
William feels that Putin was recruiting people from further away as they are more remote from the Ukrainians. This idea came from what he’d read about how the fighting during the 1st World War became less intense after the Christmas truce, with both sides meeting each other and realising they were similar. If you know who your enemy is, you’re less likely to want to fight them.
William feels we should all investigate the whole idea of what far flung means, as the phrase has been brought up a few times in this episode. He also raises that the conflict in Ukraine is still seen as a special military operation in Putin’s eyes, it is not seen as a war.
Suzi thinks that any kind of conflict does pick out minority groups. People with more power can find ways to avoid being drafted, whereas those with less power, and minority groups fall into this category, find it harder to avoid being sent into conflict.
She raises the question of whether the Russians in the east are less likely to assimilate than western Russians, and that maybe it is easier for Putin to commit people to conflict that are so far away from him?
Stuart points out that maybe we’re assuming that Putin has an agenda, maybe it is more that Russia is a vast country, and he needs to recruit from these far flung areas of the country? Stuart mentions that Russia is such a vast country that you are always going to get rebels, because it is uncontrollable. He also raises a potential void in connection between the Russian and Ukrainian people.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Should the UK monarchy consider promoting women within its ranks for a more consensual and relatable image? Is the slimming down of the monarchy just an illusion, or a genuine effort towards a more inclusive future?
In this off the cuff episode, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow dive headfirst into a thought-provoking listener question sent in by Mia from Western Australia. Mia’s question is:
“Great podcast guys. Even though I don’t listen to often, when I do, I slip straight back in and get where you are coming from. Your podcast is like an old pair of comfortable slippers. Having a Queen seems more consensual than having a King, so the predicted slimming down of the UK monarchy needs to potentially factor in having some strong powerful women within its ranks, so as to be relatable and maintain wider relevance.
It seems like old and middle aged men are going to have the role of monarch, unless young Prince George has a female heir. It's strange not having a female monarch as since 1837 we’ve only had a male monarch for 52 years as the other 134 we had a Queen. We’ve lost a Motherly figure, that happened to be a Queen, and that makes a transition to a male monarch harder for some, so the female influence needs factoring into Charles’s reign in my view”.
The discussion between Stuart and William centres around the future of the UK monarchy, and the potential benefits of having strong and powerful women within its ranks. With the recent transition to King Charles,your co-hosts explore the concept of a female monarch being more consensual and relatable. They also ponder whether having a female monarch is the only way to introduce a positive female influence within the monarchy. They consider the possibility of having female presence around the leader, which could be equally significant in shaping the institution's image.
During this episode Stuart and William talk about the WOW Effect / Wildman On Wheels where we are raising £24,000 to help fund two wheelchairs enabling Stuart to continue bringing nature into the daily lives of others, sharing a lifetime of outdoor wisdom.
Here is a link to that fundraiser: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Through the Wow Effect (Wildman On Wheels) we aim to show that even if you have a green space you can enjoy within 15 minutes of where you live, is that space really accessible if you are in a wheelchair or have another disability and can't get in when you arrive? We want to reframe the understanding of accessible countryside.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Why did the world witness such an overwhelming outpouring of emotion, following the death of Queen Elizabeth II? Whether or not you think that emotion was hyped and whipped up by the media, does this response indicate a broader yearning for stability, belonging, direction, and meaning in our lives? Is it possible that we seek something beyond ourselves to fill a void, bringing a sense of purpose?
In this thought-provoking episode, your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow delve deep into the heart of a matter raised via a question sent in by Maria in Catalonia, Spain. Maria's question is, "Did the outpouring of emotion shown after the death of Queen Elizabeth II indicate many of us are missing something from our lives, and in need of something outside of ourselves to bring stability, direction, and meaning?"
During this episode Stuart and William embark on an exploration of human emotions,and our inherent need for something greater than ourselves. They delve into the universal human need for stability, and meaning, they then examine how society may sometimes seek external sources to anchor itself, amidst turbulent times.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
What are some concrete ways in which we can rethink the term "indigenous", to acknowledge the diversity and complexity of these cultures, rather than viewing them under a broad umbrella term? In what ways can we learn from indigenous peoples' deep connections to the natural world, applying their wisdom to create a more sustainable and harmonious relationship with our environment?
In this thought-provoking episode, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow delve into the intricate and critical issues surrounding the integration of indigenous people of the rainforests into the mainstream economy. The inspiration for this discussion comes from a profound question sent in by Kadonkechi from Minas Gerais, Brazil. Kadonkechi:
“In Brazil the government states it wants to integrate the indigenous people of the rain forests into the mainstream economy, lifting millions out of poverty. That seems to assume these cultures are poor, don’t you think?
If we realised the potential of valuing the rain forest in new ways, it could also mean we all can become richer without destroying cultures. Billions of pounds worth of medicines, largely potentially undiscovered currently, can be surely found in the forests, why can't we explore and culture those, instead of clearing forests for short term cash crops or oil?
The rain forest could house the cure of the next pandemic or even Cancer. There's so much to be learnt from indigenous peoples. Millions of indigenous people lived in South America, then the Europeans colonised the coast 500 years ago, and viruses like flu and measles spread that killed up to 90% of the indigenous people.
Numbers are recovering but these people are at threat from deforestation and we need to learn from them before it's too late. I feel the next pandemic could come from Brazil if we keep encroaching on the forest as we are, allowing viruses to jump from wild animals to humans more easily.
Covid is thought to have come from bats and Pangelins, or from living too close to rain forests etc, and Measles is thought to have originated from cattle, so we really need to think about the future, whether or not you feel Covid escaped from a laboratory”.
During this episode Stuart and Wlliam tackle pressing questions such as whether we should put a monetary value on these ancient cultures, and what the real ambition of integrating indigenous cultures into ours is. Maybe we should really be thinking about how we should integrate ourselves into their culture too, it's a two way street after all..They question the pursuit of eternal growth in a society driven by profit margins, and discuss the importance of valuing aspects of life beyond the monetary system.
Throughout the episode, they explore the potential for mutual learning and growth between cultures and ponder whether the term "indigenous" is an umbrella term that oversimplifies the vast diversity among these groups. So we ask you to think about whether it’s true that for us to learn from someone who is different from us culturally we have to accept them for being different in the first place. And if we don’t accept that, we don’t accept what they say.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/45vuCPP , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Have you ever wondered why Sir David Attenborough's voice resonates so deeply with people of all ages? What makes him such a timeless figure, spanning across generations? How does he manage to strike the perfect balance between relatability and authority when discussing the natural world?
He's very relatable, but we don’t know that much about him as a person, and until we stop and think about that, many of us have never really appreciated that void in knowledge, which is an interesting thing to explore in itself. Some celebrities insist on knowing every little nuance of their character and life, yet we’re happy to not dig into what lies beneath Sir David's public profile.
In this episode your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow dive into the enigmatic persona of Sir David Attenborough, a man who has captivated audiences for decades.
This was sparked by Mary from Gorse Hill, Swindon, Wiltshire, England, who sent in a thought-provoking question, asking, "Why do you think David Attenborough is so relevant across all generations?"
During the episode Stuart and WIlliam discuss how Sir David’s genuine passion for the natural world shines through every word, making complex concepts approachable to everyone without ever sounding condescending. They'll also explore his relatable nature, despite having a posh accent, and how this quality has endeared him to viewers worldwide.
They examine how Sir David Attenborough's on-screen presence and communication skills have allowed him to connect not just with individuals but entire families across different eras. His ability to bridge the gap between generations has turned his documentaries into shared experiences that can be enjoyed together. Every generation can relate as they’ve known him, which means a whole family can enjoy what he does.You get the impression that if you met him, he’d still be very relatable in person, and would be a good man to have a conversation with.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
During this episode Stuart and William talk about the fundraiser of £24,000 to help fund two wheelchairs enabling Stuart to continue bringing nature into the daily lives of others, sharing a lifetime of outdoor wisdom. You can donate today through the following link: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This is our 450th episode! We ask though, what does 450 episodes really mean? Does it in itself mean anything?
Thanks for continuing to send in questions for us to discuss. We never planned to get to 450 episodes, our aim is always just the next episode.
So, todays question comes from Mia, in Western Australia.
“What’s your favourite piece of natural history footage?”
Stuart and William, your co-hosts share their favourite natural history footage. Stuart’s is David Attenborough being sat on by a Gorilla. William’s remembers seeing footage of a particular bird which could mimic any sound it heard.
The best natural history footage gives you an understanding of that creature’s environment, and where they live. Are we too squeamish about seeing animals kill and consume another? Isn’t this just the cycle of life?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Another listener question for your co-hosts Stuart and William to discuss, and todays is this one from Maria, Catalonia, Spain:
“How do you think King Charles 3rd will evolve the UK monarchy? It's been said the monarchy will be slimmed down, what does that mean? The people are struggling in so many ways, how will the new King show the monarchy and royal family understand and can relate to the people, and how the people can relate to the monarchy? Or will it all be lip service to show and prove royalty still has a place in modern society, and effectively just a ruse by the system to save itself?”
William thinks we should abolish the monarchy, do you agree with him?
That said, Charles 3rd is clearly evolving the role in a masculine way obviously, but you can see that he can’t be as open as he used to be, due to the protocol of the position. So, how much can he really evolve the monarchy with these restrictions?
Charles is finding it hard to bite his tongue, it isn’t the natural way, he’s used to speaking his mind. The monarchy has 100s of years of history behind it, so, even if the monarchy were slimmed down, they’d still be out there doing what they do.
Further, how can the monarchy really understand and relate to people in the general public? How can we as people in the general public relate to the monarchy? How can you relate to someone above you and how can you relate to someone below you?
The royal family are just another family, it’s just that they’re in the public, so does the royal family have a place in modern society? The royal family is motivated to stay relevant so we don’t revolt and get rid of them. Why do we follow each other and traditions like sheep? Isn’t life much more interesting when we don’t always follow traditions?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
The WOW Effect, is effectively the effect we’ll have by getting Stuart ‘The Wildman’ a wheelchair, so he can keep working. Wildman On Wheels = The WOW Effect.
Join us in this bonus episode, where Stuart and William discuss the fundraising campaign to help the former continue bringing nature into the daily lives of others.
The goal is to raise £24,000 to fund two wheelchairs, which will enable Stuart to continue sharing a lifetime of outdoor wisdom and breaking down disability barriers.
A grant of £9k has already been secured from Access to Work, a government body that helps people get or stay in work if they have a physical or mental health condition or disability. However this won’t be paid out until both chairs are purchased in full. That generous 9k offer won’t be on the table indefinitely, so this Just Giving effort needs to gain good momentum and fast. The Access To Work 9k offer is on the table until November 2023, and though it can be extended, it can only be extended once.
In this bonus episode you will hear about the different ways to donate, including one-time and monthly options, and how your support can make a real difference.
Whether you’re an individual or a business, your support is invaluable.
You can find out more about the funding campaign on the following page:
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
When we set out to make this podcast, our aim has always been just to focus on creating the next episode, nothing more complicated than that. Here we are 5 years later, carrying out that aim.
During the life of this podcast we’ve seen changes in its content. from the early days of having invited guests meeting us face to face, to having honest, in-depth conversations, through the COVID pandemic lockdowns where we then turned to you, the listener, to send us in questions for Stuart and William to discuss.
This podcast will continue to evolve naturally, it will never stay still, or get stale. Once again the questions that you’ve been sending inject a real freshness to each episode, as the themes vary widely from nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Will the podcast still be around in another five years? We’d like to think so. But our goal will always remain the same, to get the next episode of this podcast recorded, edited, and released.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Do you think if somewhere like Australia became a republic that it would start the ball rolling, and other countries would go the same way? Is the UK a republic under the veil of a monarchy? What is the reticence of becoming a republic?
“Now Queen Elizabeth 2nd has passed, do you think there will be a surge of countries moving towards becoming a republic, like New Zealand? They might stay part of the Commonwealth, and new applications may be made to join the Commonwealth, but will more countries still become a republic?”
It’ll be interesting to see what happens after the ascension of King Charles III, though neither Stuart and William have really seen any news of New Zealand wanting to become a republic.
An example of the above not happening though is Brexit, because so far no country has followed the lead of the UK. This could be down to other countries seeing the perceived effects on the UK of leaving the UK.
There was a trust, and relationship with Queen Elizabeth II, but the new king gives those voices who want to break away from the commonwealth, an opportunity to get their voice heard.
Stuart and William mention a Just Giving page in this episode, here’s the link https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Without 'YOU' and your support we won't be able to continue to break down the disability barriers we face in providing our Wildman Environmental Learning service. We won't be able to continue to meaningfully take the benefits of being out in nature, and an awareness of the natural world around us, to wider audiences. This is particularly important at a time when we all know a connection with nature has benefits on multiple levels.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
“If you could win an all-expenses paid trip anywhere in the world, where would it be, and how would you get there?”
That is the question sent in by listener Joceline, from Grand Port District in Mauritius, and it fits in well with this podcast's overall themes of nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Where are the places you wouldn’t want to go to? Where are the places you would want to go?
Co-hosts Stuart and William suggest the greenest way currently is often the longest way, and that is something that needs looking at by society. Though on an all-expenses trip, the method of travel, and route, is often baked in with little flex for the itinerary to be changed to be made more sustainable.
They go on to say they themselves feel travel can very much be part of a holiday as well, and Stuart feels has been everywhere he’s wanted to go. So if won this trip being discussed, he’d give it to someone that he feels would benefit from the adventure more than him.
On the other hand, if William won it, he feels he’d go to Hamburg, but insist on taking slower methods of transit. So train, ferry etc. Making the whole thing as sustainable as he could.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
In another captivating episode, hosts Stuart and William delve into the enchanting world of the seasons, and their profound impact on our lives. Even if we don’t notice. Join them as they explore this simple, yet deep question that listener Manon from Pays de la Loire, France, poses: “Which is your favourite season and why?”
During this episode Stuart and William contemplate the cyclical nature of time, and challenge our perceptions of the changing seasons. Can we truly imagine the transition from winter to summer, or vice versa, when immersed in one season's embrace? And with climate patterns shifting, is the traditional concept of seasons evolving before our eyes?
It’s always worth reminding ourselves that the environment isn’t just ‘out there’ somewhere, it’s all around us at any given moment in time. Enjoy the season you’re in, as each has its own value and merits. Every season has its own feeling.
What are the three words that reflect each season to you?
This particular episode was edited by Lukas Seifert, an Oxford University Micro intern, who worked alongside Stuart and William for a week on a variety of creative tasks, including the edit of this episode. We’d like to thank Lukas for his work, notably the high standard he brought to the role, great communication skills, and also the extra energy and impetus he gave us.
Lukas edited the next episode too, so check it out when its released, and see if his differing editing style brings a different vibe.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Are some people really content living their lives without aspirations and dreams? Does the absence of these goals devalue their existence?
Stuart and William, the hosts of this well established podcast, delve into the realm of ambitions and dreams, spurred on by the captivating question below, which was sent in by listener, Peter from Ostergotland, Sweden:
“What’s the point of a life without dreams and ambition?”
Together, Stuart and William navigate the winding paths of life's purpose. Discussing how dreams and ambitions can both enrich and restrict our experiences.
Join them on this nomadic journey of introspection, as they explore whether having aspirations truly imbues a life with meaning, or if it's merely a passing pursuit. Life, after all, is a constantly evolving tapestry, of unexpected twists and turns.
Your hosts remind us that there's no need to feel guilty or inadequate for not having dreams and ambition, and that we can also find solace in embracing the ebb and flow of life, away from those kinds of distractions, as dreams can be restrictive at times too.
Though it's true, some people need ambitions to drive them, it's also worth remembering, all any of us are really doing is, passing time.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Considering the debate surrounding the timing of protests, should certain occasions, such as periods of mourning, be considered off-limits for demonstrations, or can they still serve as powerful platforms for expressing dissent?
Stuart and William once again explore and chew over another great listener question, which was this time sent in by Molly from Oxford, England. Molly’s question was long and detailed, so would have exceeded the character limit in this description, so instead of including it here verbatim, we’ve copied it onto a Google doc, using the following link: Link to Molly’s full question
The crux of Molly’s question is “Please explore the right to protest, and right to grieve?”
During this episode Stuart and William explore the notion of self-censorship, and the complexities surrounding freedom of speech. Stuart and William feel freedom of speech isn’t always the right to say what you want, when you want.
They discuss whether protests should be separated from certain occasions, and whether the timing of a protest affects its effectiveness, positively and negatively. Further exploring the question of whether a protest at the coronation would be better timed than during a period of mourning, like at Queen Elizabeth the 2nd’s funeral?
Regardless of whether the media whipped people up into phantom sadness, with all the wall to wall mass coverage of her funeral, should the timings of the protests that happened there have been considered better? The protestors at this very public event were trying to get their message across and heard, but if timed badly, that message could have been lost. If any protest happens at the wrong point, it increases the chance of a higher percentage of negative feedback, and less time or opportunity for dialogue. There’s never a good time to protest, but shouldn’t we be highlighting some issues and having some conversations away from these kind of occasions?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
How has the word "passionate" become overused and diluted in our everyday language, and what alternative ways can we use to express genuine enthusiasm and curiosity? What are the consequences of constantly labelling people, events, and things as “passionate” or “iconic," and how has this led to the loss of the true essence of these words?
Join William and Stuart as they engage in another captivating conversation, this time sparked by listener Justin's question from Nova Scotia, Canada. Their question is as follows:
“What are you both passionate about?”
During the episode William contemplates his own interests, and concludes that perhaps he is simply genuinely intrigued by them, rather than being truly passionate. Meanwhile, Stuart, driven by a deep aversion to the word and a fervent desire to refine language, passionately advocates for the removal of the word "passionate" from the everyday English lexicon.
Throughout the episode, Stuart and William Stuart contemplate the nature of passion itself, examining whether it is merely an emotion, that can blind individuals from perceiving reality, objectively. They pose questions about the importance of seeking balance in life, and challenge listeners to reconsider the role of measured expression, in a world saturated and impregnated with hyperbole.
During this episode they also mention the talks they do together, and in particular mention the Speakernet link which lists the six talks they do together that you can book them for.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
TRIGGER WARNING!!! If you’re listening to this episode with your children, cover their ears! There’s a lot of swearing! We’ve not edited it out as the feeling behind the delivery, this time, really reinforces the point being made, and brings to life the story behind told.
This podcast's overall essence and themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Today's listener question comes from Colin in Saarland, Germany. It's short and concise, but enough meat on the bone for Stuart and William, your co-hosts, to survive on. Here it is:
“Who or what has let you down or disappointed you in recent times?”
They explore if a person actually lets us down, or is it our expectations of them haven’t been met? To be let down we need to have an expectation in the first place, is that always the case though?
Stuart and William are very honest with who they feel have let them down, and explore what that really means. A very personal episode for them both.
Who do you feel has let you down? Did they really let you down or did you have unrealistic or improbable expectations?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
This was a genocide.
It took a lot of courage for the Pope to come out with the word genocide. It’s a powerful statement, but now we need progression. We need to build a pathway forward.
Does the fact the Pope has come out mean that what happened can no longer be denied though?
A way forward too is to keep talking about it, keep exploring the harsh truths, to be open about what happened. The problem won’t go away, it is part of all our histories.
Bruce, who listens from Tampa, Florida, USA, certainly opens a can of worms with this question he’s sent in for discussion:
“Have you explored on the podcast that the Pope has said the treatment of Indigenous First Nation children, by the Catholic Church, amounts to genocide?”
In the last century, a lot of children were forcibly taken from indigenous first nation indian cultures in the US, and settled with white, English speaking families, or put in homes run by the Catholic church. Seemingly with the aim of diluting the influence and power of the first nation cultures.
Many of the children's remains are now being discovered inside and outside these homes, so this can certainly be considered genocide.
Genocide is a very powerful statement. There are good people in history though, and there are bad people. There’s some good history, there’s some bad history. It’s easy to have vitriol against something, and you can turn yourself inside out and into a rabid dog about such things, but does that anger truly solve the issues fully? Speak to the person in front of you, see them as a human being, and see where the conversation goes. No issue in history has ever failed to ultimately be resolved by people coming together and discussing the harsh truths. That's what's needed here, well that's what your co-hosts feel.
Some of the most celebrated American celebrities are deeply rooted indigenous cultures, so let's keep talking and valuing those different to us.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark World Refugee Day, in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
World Refugee Day honours the strength and courage of refugees, and encourages public awareness and support of the refugees, people who have had to flee their home lands because of conflict or natural disaster.
Refugees are vulnerable and in need, and are often misunderstood and maligned. They can often have very little or none of their possessions and little food, because they’ve had to leave their homes with nothing or with what they can carry. They suffer cold, hunger, trauma, despair, disease, violence and loss. The awareness day is to help public understanding of refugees as well as raising support and help.
Across the world, agencies, both governmental and non-governmental, work tirelessly to help refugees. Yet with people being made refugees daily, more help and awareness is constantly needed, to ensure that refugees are treated fairly and provided for. rather than being neglected or shunned, which is why there are projects to re-settle and provide for refugees. So World Refugee Day highlights all of this. And now it also marks the launch of the ‘With Refugees’ petition, which will state the needs and potential rights of refugees.
You can find out more about World Refugee Day on the following website: https://www.unhcr.org/world-refugee-day
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
It’s a very powerful statement, blocking out the name of a Russian city because of the invasion of Ukraine, but is it really a wise move? Wouldn’t it be better to just freeze the link? Twinning connects two towns, to share resources, culture etc, cutting ties is perhaps very final and overly excessive.
Is the suspension of the twinning a PR stunt, shouldn’t we instead recognise that there is still a link? It’s very likely that the connections are still there personally on a human level, so what is this really about?
Listener Tony, from New Hinksey, Oxford, England, really gets things going with this question he’s sent in:
“You may have covered this but I see on the signs when entering Oxford, that the city is twinned with a large number of cities and towns across the world. The twinning with Perm in Russia has been blacked out, possibly because of the Ukrainian invasion? Is it right to walk away from this connection?”
Your co-hosts Stuart and William believe this is a bigger issue than it may appear at first glance. This podcast is about broadening out narratives and the narrative certainly needs exploring with this. So though the connection with Perm has been suspended and not cancelled permanently, these established and valuable connections are going to help rebuild bridges in the future.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
This episode explores that there are situations that we really should stick our neck out and speak up, and those when we shouldn’t. Sometimes though it's worth just putting your opinion out there, and see what comes back.
The people who are willing to stick their neck above the parapet are those usually willing to state and have their opinion challegend. Listen twice as much as you speak and see what you learn. Just because you change your mind, doesn’t mean you’re admitting to being wrong, you're just open to change.
Public speaking is in a way sticking your neck out, but it's a learnt skill, have you mastered it?
Listener Fran, from Liverpool, New York (State), USA, sent in this question which generated yet another conversation between your co-hosts Stuart and William. Here it is:
“Do you think people are more readily able and willing to stick their neck out and speak up if they truly believe in what they’re saying?”
Stuart and William feel people generally like to go with the consensus, the people who like to stick their neck out are in the minority more often than not. They feel people can be more willing to speak up, if what they say is generally going to be agreed with. Is this true though?
If you truly believe in something, put it out there and see what comes back. It's worth considering though, do we all get an opportunity to speak up?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
What are the implications of renters knowingly overstretching themselves in the private house rental sector, particularly in competitive markets like London? How does the practice of selling council houses impact the availability of affordable housing and the council house stock? What are the benefits of repurposing empty buildings, such as shops and commercial spaces, into communal living areas, to address the shortage of affordable housing?
In this episode Stuart and William delve into a thought-provoking question sent in by listener Alec, in Angel, London, England:
“You may have discussed this before but wondered what your views were on the private house rental sector. Primarily the fact renters are knowingly over stretching themselves, and being allowed to. Here in London people are offering higher rent that is being asked so as to secure somewhere to live, even though they can't afford it. I saw a letting agent on the news the other day, working on behalf of a landlord who said it's up to the renters to ensure they are paying what they can afford, but if they want to get a property in a competitive market, they have to do this. I feel this is passing the buck of responsibility. Also, tenants are being kicked out after 6 months as they can’t afford to stay, so the landlord is left with a void period when the property is empty, and extra costs finding a replacement. This sticking the head in the sand makes no sense on any level really within modern society”.
During this episode they explore the consequences of tenants being evicted after just six months, due to their inability to sustain the high rental costs. Landlords are then faced with the challenge of finding replacements, resulting in void periods and additional expenses. This short-sighted approach seems counterproductive in modern society, raising concerns on multiple levels.
They also go on to examine the impact of council house stock not being replenished. The ability to purchase council houses at competitive rates, only to sell them to private landlords who charge significantly higher rents, which depletes the availability of affordable housing options.
Ultimately Stuart and William approach the topic from a humanitarian standpoint, emphasising the importance of providing safe and secure housing for those who are homeless. In times of crisis, such as the one we are experiencing now, they also consider the environmental benefits of adapting empty buildings, rather than constructing new ones.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
What was the most controversial change in UK agriculture, according to Stuart, and what were the consequences associated with it? To what extent has Brexit impacted the UK agricultural industry, and what perspective does William offer on its significance?
Join Stuart and William in this engaging episode of their podcast, as they take a deep dive into a thought-provoking question from listener Les, from Marcham, Oxfordshire, England.
Les poses a compelling query: "What do you think is the most controversial change in UK agriculture?"
Stuart suggests that the most controversial change in UK agriculture was the introduction of the threshing machine, as this innovation led to a little discussed countryside famine, as it left workers very little to do and earn during the winter months. William on the other hand cites the impact of Brexit on the industry. Do you agree with them?
Drawing parallels to the challenges of rapid transitions, they reflect on the difficulty people face in adapting to sudden changes, and the importance of creating a followable pathway, that ensures inclusivity and support for all affected parties.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
How does the concept of strikes extend beyond just wages? Should we rely heavily on the government to fill societal gaps, or should we seek alternative solutions? How does the lack of human connection and belonging in an era of easy connection impact society?
Join Stuart and William in this thought-provoking episode as they probe and delve into the complex issues raised in the question below sent in by listener Nigel from Blackbird Leys, Oxford, England.
“Summer 2022 will be remembered for many things, but one of the things I’ll remember it for is the strikes in the rail industry and many other industries. Many of the strikes were about wages not keeping place with inflation and it being hard to navigate the cost of living crisis.
Some industries never got a pay rise at all, and some of those didn’t strike I notice, but I'm not sure whether I think they should have or agree with them not striking. I’m not in their shoes so I'm not sure. Can I ask, do you think it's up to us as individuals to build in resilience to all aspects of our life, or is it fair to look at the government to fill the gap between pay rises and the cost of living/inflation? Also should the government fill that gap, some of the gap, or none of that gap?
Maybe you think the government should flip flop between those 3 options depending on the situation, the industry involved, and the situation at play? Or maybe you feel this is the start of societal collapse due to the climate crisis, so the above mitigation measures are better suited to maintaining the status quo and business as usual, and we need a new and better range of support packages, transitional support, mitigation measures, personal responsibility and sense of community for us all to move forward as a society?”
During this episode Stuart and William navigate the complexities of strikes, government waste, societal collapse, and the need for a more inclusive and compassionate society.
Acknowledging the existing gaps within society, they propose the exploration of different approaches to address them. They stress the need for better and more comprehensive support systems, particularly in the UK, where there's a significant imbalance exists between the haves and the have-nots.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
In what ways can we cultivate awareness of our habitual actions, and break free from potentially damaging behaviours? Is it possible to create widespread change by rallying everyone together on a transformative journey, or does true transformation require reaching a critical mass?
In this thought-provoking episode, join Stuart and William as they delve into the following captivating question, raised by listener Alivia from Ridgway, Illinois, USA:
“I was sat people watching the other day in a cafe, as they were sweltering in the heat. Heard them say the government, service providers and a range of other people should do something to secure food and water resources during drought like conditions.
Not sure any of the people I overheard talking fully grasped this could be human caused climate change showing itself, they seemed content blaming others for badly managing the life support systems we rely on.
At some point all individuals are going to have to stop the blame games and get their own houses in order, within a more localised community set up (thats still outward looking) looking within to fathom out how to live differently, and survive and let go of the attachments of the past and current systems and habits/expectations we need to distance ourselves from.
When do you think this change will happen, has it started already, will it ever start?”
Throughout the episode, Stuart and William encourage personal growth and self-reflection, reminding us that embarking on a journey of change begins with questioning our own lives. They inquire whether it is possible to rally everyone together on this transformative path or if reaching a critical mass is the key to widespread change.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Is it a distraction to expect climate protesters to be whiter than white, and not drive, and not wear clothes made from plastic, as we’re all currently locked into the same systems aren't we? Isn’t it time to grow up and to move beyond these arguments?
How do we know whether these clothes they are wearing are brand new or have maybe been passed along many times, and reused many times?
Debs, from Didcot, Oxfordshire, England, got a really interesting conversation going just by sending in this question below.
“Heard your episode about fast fashion earlier and you recommend buying secondhand clothes to extend the lifespan of oil and plastic based clothes, which avoids them going to landfill or recycling when they are still in good condition. I also see images of climate protesters on social media who have purchased second hand clothes, often get the criticism that people won’t listen to them as they are wearing oil based and polluting clothing (the production process) so are hypocrites. Are they hypocrites or helping reduce the carbon footprint of the garments by purchasing second hand? There's a ton of snobbery around buying second hand clothes, but that's down to peoples ego, not a reflection that the clothes are soiled or dirty”.
Your co-hosts Stuart and William discuss many things in this episode including that a lot of people get clothes from the sales, and then never wear them, and give them to charity, so often these second hand items have never been worn.
There’s even a scheme that logs who has owned particular clothing, similar to car log books. So instead of throwing something out, the scheme is maybe prolonging the life of these items. It’s all about extending the lifespan of these clothes.
There is a snobbery when it comes to owning second hand clothes. Why is there a stigma around charity shop clothes? They're not charity for you, but sold to support good causes. You can choose the shops and charities you want to support, often in your local area too. So donate unused items to local charity shops.
Also plastic/oil in clothing isn’t the only material that is bad for the environment. How about cotton for example and the amount of water that is used in its production for the clothing industry?
If we do away with oil based clothing, there will be people who will lose their jobs. We need to offer these people guided pathways to help them change, and not be left behind if we transition too fast. There is an urgency to make changes, but there are also the practicalities to transitioning real lives, and we may have to accept we could have left it too long to quickly reverse the effects we’ve had on the climate. You need to take people with you, so do we really need to be categorical when it comes to banning? It’s not what you do, it’s how you do it?
Is being dictatorial really a way to get someone on your side, and to a place where they feel they can make a change? There are people who want to ban the Grand National horse race overnight, but will happen to the 50,000+ racing horses? What will happen to all the people who are currently working within the industry as well? We need a way to properly transform our societal structures that takes people with us on guided pathways.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://bit.ly/425GXat
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Regular listener Jack from Long Wittenham in Oxfordshire, England, sets Stuart and William another question to explore in this episode, and as they feel there are so many great villages in Oxfordshire, have a listen to this episode to find out what your co-hosts favourites might be.
They also mention County boundaries have altered quite a lot over the years with Abingdon for example being in Berkshire at one time. Other villages have been absorbed by the city of Oxford yet still maintain a village feel.
Here’s Jack’s question: “Which are your favourite villages in Oxfordshire and why?”
Do you agree with what William and Stuart come up with? Regardless of if you do or not, maybe next time you go for a walk, try to hunt out and see the history around you, and what the buildings might be revealing about the past.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Is it a distraction trying to fully understand where the impacts of Brexit begins and ends, where the impacts of Covid begins and ends, where the impacts of the cost of living crisis begins and ends, where the impacts of the war in Ukraine begins and ends, where the impacts of the climate crisis begins and ends?
Quite a conundrum, which arose from today's listener question, sent in by Billy, in Saugus, Massachusetts, USA.
“I spent some time in the UK recently, and like many countries at the moment, the wheels seem to be coming off many aspects of your country and systems. Do you think this is caused by Brexit, Covid, Cost Of Living crisis, the climate crisis, or something else? Not sure where one issue begins and another ends currently, do you guys?”
Your co-hosts Stuart and William feel it's potentially a mixture of Brexit, Covid, the Cost Of Living crisis, the climate crisis and much more, as Billy concisely states in his question. Though Covid could probably be more impactful than Brexit in some instances for example. Brexit is though a contributing factor in the UK, as we chose to do it ourselves.
They suggest maybe we should all do some research to try and fathom where all these things begin and end, whether it is Brexit, Covid, Cost Of Living crisis, the war in Ukraine, or the climate crisis. We may not find any definitive conclusions, but it might widen our shared perspective a bit more.
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expanded and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience, and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the former Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire 3.30pm to 9pm. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Are awareness campaigns that are based around TV shows, actually effective? Aren’t stories direct from a person you can identify with more powerful? Do we too easily get stuck in the position that everything happens to other people, and not ourselves?
Ron from Cuddesdon, Oxfordshire, England, has sent in another listener question, detailed below, which triggered yet another off the cuff conversation between co-hosts Stuart and William.
“I’ve heard that a comedian who has had testicular cancer, and was involved in the awareness campaign before he was diagnosed, still didn’t check himself, even though the campaign was telling that message. Does that mean these awareness campaigns headed up by the famous, do very little? Is sharing life experience and true stories more powerful?”
Campaigns fronted by celebrities aren’t going to create change on their own, that's Stuart and William’s take, what do you think? They feel we shouldn’t get rid of these awareness campaigns though, we need to set them alongside powerful stories about actual life situations.
If any of us were to go and listen to an empowered speaker, the key, they feel, is whether we take that inspiration into our own life, and change our own habits, and not just go home from the experience and go straight back to normal life, without making changes if needed.
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expanded and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience, and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the former Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire 3.30pm to 9pm. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Why do some people have a fear of wasting money on rent? Is the desire for ownership just another way to avoid the reality of our own mortality? Why do so many people aspire to own their own piece of land?
In this episode, inspired by the question below, which was sent in by listener Tom in Garland, Texas, USA, Stuart and William explore among other topics, the fear that many people have of living in rented accommodation.
“What do you feel about the anomaly of a mindset of moaning that house prices are too high to get on the housing ladder, yet once on it people want the value to keep increasing? What's the root of the fear about living in rented accommodation for the rest of one's life?”
They go on to discuss the paradoxical nature of being happy for house prices to rise once you are a property owner, but unhappy when trying to buy a house. They also examine the cultural differences in attitudes towards renting versus buying a home, and the common fear of wasting money on rent.
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expanded and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience, and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the former Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire 3.30pm to 9pm. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Is the privatisation of water resources working for, or against us? And are we, as individuals, being brainwashed into thinking we can make a difference?
Join Stuart and William for another insightful and thought-provoking conversation, this time centred around the topic of water security. This conversation was prompted by the following question, sent in by listener Diane from Southampton, Hampshire, England:
“During the summer of 2022, some water companies in the UK issued a hosepipe ban. Is it reasonable to pass the responsibility of sustaining water supplies during a drought to the general public, when 100’s if not thousands of leaks occur from the water companies pipes. Like the massive one that flooded Islington in North London, and the one on Oxford Ring Road (that a local councillor was spotted swimming in to make the point) in August 2022?
It seems to some that it's unfair to prevent domestic gardeners watering their plants and lawns, when the leaks remain. Gardening is therapeutic to many, so imagine how it must feel to be prevented from watering the garden how you may wish, and watch to plants you’ve been nurturing die in front of your eyes.
I also saw the source of the River Thames dried up and moved 5 miles downstream during the summer drought in 2022. Is this because the water companies are extracting too much water, or is it a sign of global warming?
You may feel it's impossible for any company to maintain the infrastructure we rely on, as it's been built and added too bit by bit, and we now possibly have too much to manage? Maybe this is all a symptom of our society not being sustainable? Maybe you think many leaks occurred because the ground was just so dry, and the leaks aren’t as widespread as the media say it is?”
Your co-hosts go on to discuss different ways of regulating water usage, including growing plants that can cope with the drier climate. They ask whether we need to stop trying to impose our will on the land, and instead grow plants that don't require us to keep pumping water in to keep them alive. They also examine the idea of making our water supply more localised, rather than creating large bodies of water as reservoirs and then needing to pump that water for miles and miles.
Are our values still very much Victorian in the United Kingdom, with many of us simply flushing away what we don't want and not thinking about it again, passing the issue on to someone else?
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expanded and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience, and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the former Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire 3.30pm to 9pm. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Can we truly draw definitive conclusions, without overlooking the complexity of this snapshot? Is our understanding of man-made climate change evolving, or are we merely scratching the surface?
Your co-hosts Stuart and William once again delve into and explore a question sent in by a listener, with today’s coming in from Guy in Grove City, Ohio, USA. His question is as follows:
“I saw a report in August 2022 that some parts of the coral reef that makes up The Great Barrier Reef in Australia has recovered, so it covers a wider area than it has for at least 30 years. Is the evidence that the decrease in coral over recent years has nothing to do with so-called man made climate change?”
Without concrete facts at hand, your co hosts navigate through the challenges of discussing a topic as vast as climate change. They question the assumption that man-made climate change is an irreversible reality, considering the various factors at play. They go on to explore the realm of coral populations, and find themselves pondering: where exactly have the increases in coral population occurred, and why? Together with how are our studies and data interpretation evolving and is longer term understanding impacting the interpretation of the data we have?
Stuart and William aren’t experts on most of the topics explored in these podcast episodes, but they explore them to the edge of their understanding. This question today is one of those that talks them to their limit.
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expanded and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience, and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the former Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire 3.30pm to 9pm. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Are we truly allowing the women's game to flourish, or are we inadvertently controlling and comparing it to its male counterpart? Does the men's game, with its long-standing institutionalised habits, have an impact on how the women's game could evolve? Can we break free from these ingrained patterns, and embrace a new era?
Once again your co-hosts Stuart ‘The Wildman’ Mabbutt and William Mankelow explore and examine a question sent in by a listener, with today’s coming from Lyn in Stanton St John, Oxfordshire, England. There question is as follows:
“Can I ask, when your next episodes of the Beyond Stereotypes and Indigenous Voices mini series will appear? All seems quiet on that front. I’ve got another thing for you to talk about too. I’m not a football/soccer fan but I did see the Women’s European Championship Final, between England and Germany in July 2022. The crowd was far less aggressive and tribal than for a men's game. At a men’s game it seems more about singing rude songs, swilling beers and fighting.
When you listen to the pitch of the sound the crowd made at this women’s final, it was a far higher frequency than a crowd for a men’s game. Maybe because there were a lot more children and women in the crowd for this women's final? You could maybe say the theatrics, the rudeness, and the testosterone fueled rhetoric of the male game is all part of it, but I feel it's a sad world if that's fully true?
The world is largely run, controlled and driven by men and the male system, would making everything less tribal and less male dominated help solve a lot of troubles across all societies?”
Drawing on their collective lived experiences, Stuart and William examine the remarkable tendency of women to work and collaborate together, the long-standing history of institutionalised habits in the men's game, and express concerns about how the women's game could in time potentially mimic the structure and dynamics of the men's game.
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expanded and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience, and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the former Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire 3.30pm to 9pm. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
What is a justified reaction to being insulted?
That's the gold nugget for us all to consider today, and comes about due to the next listener question, this time from Helen, Shavertown, Pennsylvania, USA
“Enjoying your recordings, even though I disagree with you for I’d guess 50% of the time. What I’d like you to explore is, Salmon Rushdie, the author of The Satanic Verses was attacked and stabbed here in the US. It's said to be an attack on free speech. Who dictates who should be free to speak and who isn’t? So called terrorists in the Middle East and in Ireland often haven’t been able to air their views publicly. Why are some allowed free speech and others not? Why is an attack on Mr Rushdie an attack on free speech but when the west attacks people with differing views it's often said it's not an attack of free speech? I have full sympathy with Mr Rushdie but this is something I’m pondering and churning on. I also notice nothing is really being reported about this specific situations, how is the guy doing, anyone know?”
Always interesting where the listener questions take co-hosts Stuart and William, it's often unpredictable, but it's what you the listeners want exploring afterall. They have a look at, via today's chat, whether it's true that when any of us do something controversial, we really have to pay the consequences of our choice. What happened to Rushdie though is an extreme example of that, but there are extreme people out there we have to remember.
Is freedom of speech, a freedom to say anything and anytime? Whatever we do though, someone somewhere is likely to be insulted, aren’t they?
It probably isn’t that some organisations are being silenced, but they lack a platform to speak from? You may disagree though?
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expanded and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience, and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the former Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire 3.30pm to 9pm. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Another long question sent in by listener Alan, from Northway, Oxford, England and your co hosts Stuart and William delve into the still huge stigma attached to being a council tenant in the UK.
The council has flaws, but tenants issues are often sorted quickly. Social housing in other countries isn't always called that, it can be just another housing option.
There are some cultures in the world that don’t have words for home or land ownership. The majority of people in the world don’t even have ownership on their radar.
Do any of us really own anything? Aren’t we just afraid of our own mortality and enslaved by the housing ladder?
“Council tenants thought they were going into a wonderland when they purchased their homes. That faded into tomorrow for some when the mortgage payments went from 3% to 15%, so they were strangled by repayments. I’m seeing some housing stock sold off by Oxford City Council under the Right To Buy Scheme, now being purchased back by the same council from the same tenants that purchased the properties under the scheme. In some instances I guess these properties sold for 33k and purchased back for over 250k. Is this a good use of public funds? Is it time to scrap the scheme, leaving housing within social housing stock? Not selling it off for a quick buck, that isn’t invested back into new housing?
Those purchasing under this scheme might say it's the council's fault for not investing back in housing, not theirs for buying, but in some instances they knew this probably wouldn’t be the case yet passed the ethical buck to the council. Is it time to put aside the Right To Buy if you are a long term renter, on the simple grounds of wider ethics? Is the fact the modern day council are now purchasing the same housing back, for as much as 200k more than they sold it for, an example of the council of yesteryear getting it wrong? Perhaps not, as the current council still operates the Right To Buy even now?
It seems a quick money spinner, a con for many purchasing their council homes, as being on the housing ladder isn’t always better than not being on it in my view. I’ve seen people purchase their council home, unable to progress up the ladder as they don’t earn enough as the gap to the next rung is too big. Some of those same people had their homes repossessed, as they couldn’t keep up the repair or mortgage costs. These people then had to take a lower standard council house or B&B’s when they lost their homes, and couldn’t afford private rented. What a mess! I know Housing Associations have a policy of selling older houses to fund modern ones, but the story often ends the same. Housing Associations aren’t the holy grail as social landlords, as their rent is extortionately high compared with the council in many instances.
I love my council home, and ethically have no desire to purchase it even though I’ve lived here 40 years, and I’d much prefer to have the council as my landlord, not a housing association. I worked for a housing association and know the inner workings. I know people who own their homes say they get repairs done quicker but I always have good repair service from the council my neighbors do too. I also know homeowners enjoy feeling the home is theirs, but that’s an illusion, it can be taken away, none of us own anything.
We’re largely born free, but many get caught up in the treadmill of the housing ladder which enslaves us, all because we want to avoid throwing money down the drain by renting. Most money we spend is going down the drain so whats so wrong with renting, or living as a community in a shared set up? I hope Oxford City Council never sells their stock to an association. That could be the final straw for us tenants in some instances. We’re living in a modern day work house, a modern slave trade. Just my view of course”.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
A long question sent in by listener Lyn, from Stanton St John, Oxfordshire, England, which Stuart and William examine by exploring if we should actively meet more people that are different to us, should move past labels and just let people live their lives, societal progress and the tendrils of colonialism. Set in the current context and backdrop of the cost of living crisis in the UK, and the perspective that offers.
Here’s Lyn’s question: “The 2022 Commonwealth Games, the first with more medals available to women than men. The first with disability sports integrated into the main programme, not having their separate games afterwards. LGBTQ+ competitors could hold the rainbow flag for the first time. The games were billed as the most sustainable ever (though most of the mitigation measures will take decades to off-set - like the mass planting of trees they undertook - will they be looked after and survive?). All good things right, and help to also mitigate the roots of the championships being British colonialism? Or does it? Two thirds of competing nations/territories have laws that make same sex relationships illegal, will the games change that? Nigeria, Pakistan and Brunei still have the death penalty for being gay. Pakistan has a punishment of the death by stoning for being gay, but haven’t used it. By having it does it breed a culture of seeing gay people as mutants. Nigeria recently executed 3 people for being gay. I fear preventing these countries from competing/hosting, isn’t likely to make that bigger impact. These prejudices are ingrained in families/friends/governments and sporting federations. It’s all largely driven by history and British colonialism. This hatred is rooted in laws imposed across the British empire and still exists in some countries. Homophobia has some roots in 300 years of the slave trade. Slave owners encouraged heterosexual sex amongst slaves, as it produced children, a free supply of slaves into the system. There are records of male slaves discovered to be gay, being publically raped by slave owners, to discourage homosexuality. It begs the question that the slave owners might have been gay themselves? There's always hope though, change will happen quicker if driven by love and not taking things away from cultures, like the right to host sporting events. This all makes me sad for humanity. Rainbow flags at these games aren’t enough on their own and could maybe even be seen as rainbow washing? It's a start though, and we need to start somewhere. Flying the flag is important as a sign of hope and change, but we need to progress so we don’t need flags or for people to admit they are gay, we need to allow people to just live their lives. Why punish a gay person just for existing? Finally I saw that the games cost over 800 million pounds to put on, is this a worthwhile expenditure when working people are struggling to survive soaring cost of living figures in the UK?”
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expanded and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience, and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the former Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire 3.30pm to 9pm. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
The paper industry is reportedly the 4th highest carbon-producing industry in the world. Is that true, and what are the environmental implications of that if it is? Is it just playing around the edges to focus on reducing the carbon footprint of the paper industry, or should we also be addressing the issue of over-consumption in all its forms? Is it even possible to completely eliminate paper from our lives?
It’s another thought provoking and varied question sent in by another of our listeners, this time coming from Eddie in Hillsboro, Oregon, USA. Stuart and William try to break it down into bite sized chunks, and come up with actions we can all take to address issues discussed. Eddie’s question is as follows:
“Loving listening to your podcast and I especially like that you don’t have expert guests all the time like other podcasts. I enjoy the way you challenge yourselves with random questions you talk about, as you say it's probably therapy for you both with the way you explore the unknown cold, and unprepared. You likely get to hear your own thinking only a split second before us listeners? You could maybe consider expanding on the questions further by having more episodes to cover them, and have guests or experts on the later subsequent episodes, just to mop up the nuances? That could provide material for a series of short mini series which I see you already do. It's hard to cover all the points in one episode as there's always more that could be said.
My question is, for 50 years that I know of, the concept of paperless societies have been spoken about, yet we still haven’t got there. The paper industry I’m informed is the 4th highest carbon producing industry in the world, and whether that's true or not it needs to change. I’ve heard of new technology that can remove ink from paper up to 10 times, before the sheet itself needs to be recycled.
Recycling being a polluting process in and of itself. This new tech basically vaperises much of the ink by laser, and then extracts the remaining pigment that could be put back into ink cartridges that we buy. I’ve also heard this tech could be packaged into small devices that sit next to all our printers, with us running through it us paper that we’ve printed on before to extract the ink, before we run the sheet through the printer again.
To me though having 2 devices has a carbon footprint so maybe new printers should have this new device built into them, so we only buy one and produce less packaging? Is this all just playing around the edges though? Shouldn’t we be focusing on kicking the widespread habits around over-consumption, in all its forms?”
During this episode the next iteration of Environmental Debated Live & Unscripted was mentioned? But what is it? It’s event is for anybody looking to connect with like minded people who are concerned about the big issues facing society, the perfect event to stretch your thinking, explore opportunities and build lasting links with people who want to make a difference. Book your ticket today by going to the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Last weekend, the 15th April to be precise, Stuart and William once again had a stall at the East Oxford Farmers’ & Community Market promoting the podcast and wider work.
Whilst there they took the opportunity to record a short out about item about the upcoming live iteration of this podcast, Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, which is taking place at the former Bothy Vineyard in Frilford Heath, Oxfordshire, on the 27th May 2023, 3.30pm to 9pm.
This event is for anybody looking to connect with like minded people, concerned about the big issues facing society, the perfect event to stretch your thinking, explore opportunities and build lasting links with people who want to make a difference.
You can find out more about this event with the following link.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this bonus item? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss on the podcast itself? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Is it best to not attack outlandish beliefs, and just ask questions? Can we learn from each other, even if we disagree?
In this podcast we regularly jump between very different topics, as the conversation is led by the questions sent in by you, our listeners. With today’s coming from from Karlijn in Teignmouth, Devon, England, and her question is as follows:
“I heard someone say, who is a denier of the climate emergency we face, that it's impossible for man to impact negatively on climate change, and the pollution we produce makes little impact. The increased temperatures are natural, and its natural climate change is not man-made. They went on to say that we should forget about the fake news that we are pumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, and instead focus on pumping pollutants that cools the atmosphere as a way of adapting to natural climate change. Isn’t this a contradiction, and an example of double standards? If they are right that we could cool the planet by pumping out chemicals, why is it impossible to heat the planet by pumping out other chemicals as we are? Mind you, this denier claimed climate change was all fake news as we’ve been invaded by a bunch of shape shifting reptilians that are trying to get us to destroy ourselves in the panic being caused. So these alien creatures, who are dressed up as the UK royal family, the world's politicians, Drs, police and teachers, can take over and take all of Earth's resources, before moving on to another planet. Should we take any of these statements with any seriousness?”
Another meaty topic for Stuart and William to discuss, don't you agree? In the course of their conversation, they cover how conspiracy theories can often have a veneer of truth. They bring up how there are some contradictions in this climate denier's argument, as they claim there isn’t a climate crisis, yet at the same time potentially talk about solutions to it.
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expanded and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience, and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the former Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire 3.30pm to 9pm. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Have you ever stopped to think about where your meat comes from, and what the quality is like? Ultimately, shouldn't we make sure the meat we eat is of the best quality?
Join Stuart and William for another listener lead conversation, with today’s question coming from Ron in Cuddesdon, Oxfordshire, England, which is as follows:
“I’m still enjoying your output, even if you keep calling me Rod, keep it up. I like the way you raise some of the little explored ideas within your recordings, moving away from the more mainstream angles and thinking. Opens you up to controversy, but a reaction is better than none I suppose. So, my question, I’m less convinced about the environmental arguments against eating meat, I’m more convinced by the ethical reasons not to. Does it really matter? I think whatever you eat, you should always go for good food, and generally the ethics will follow. Also, are farmers really benefiting from the subsidies they receive to produce, or is the consumer the one being subsidised, by being able to keep buying unsustainably cheap food? Maybe, if food was more costly, people would eat less, and there would be less obesity?”
During this discussion Stuart and William ask you, the listener, to think about where your meat comes from, as generally, the cheaper the meat is, the lower the quality. They also suggest we all do some research, and consider the environmental impact of meat production, which involves a vast amount of water consumption. Also, they urge you to consider how bringing ethics into meat production will naturally help the environment.
In this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expanded and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience, and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the former Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire, 3.30pm to 9pm. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Are we being brainwashed into thinking we can make a difference? We believe we can make an impact, but it requires changes in our daily lives. For example, buying from local producers can reduce carbon emissions, but should we also assist growers in countries like Colombia to transition to different products and markets?
Welcome to the People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, where we aim to challenge beliefs, mindsets, and habits. In this episode Stuart and William chew over, and discuss the following question from Shaun in Richmond, Virginia, USA.
“Hello from America. I was recommended your podcast and enjoying it. Many of the UK issues you discuss are relevant here as well. I like the way you mix things up and have unpredictable subjects discussed, but I also really like your guest episodes even though there are only a couple of dozen or so. In a couple of episodes you recommend purchasing Colombian products, to encourage producers there to grow and supply products that doesn't require more deforestation, and maybe even encourages the expansion of the rainforests? Isn’t importing Colombian products polluting in itself though, as there are a lot more transport related pollution involved in that than getting our supplies from local producers?”
Your co-hosts go on to discuss the carbon legacy since the industrial revolution, the discomforts we often feel when confronting this can come from our own insecurities. and they question whether we can expect the biggest polluting companies to change if we don't change ourselves, as individuals?
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expand and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience, and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the former Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Should we dismiss this climate crisis denier? Or explore their ideas to some degree as there may be an element of truth in what they say? Shouldn’t we just pull up our socks and get used to these higher temperatures?
These points came up because of today's listener question, this time sent in by Iris in Wetley Rocks, Staffordshire, England.
“I’ve heard a climate crisis denier claim it's all a hoax, after the heatwave in the UK in 2022, which hit a new temperature high of 40.3, when some countries regularly hit 44, and just get on with it. They felt these high temperatures are just what happens in summer. They also said how can we know if the temperature is rising in the whole world, as some parts of the world that are claimed to be hotter these days actually don't have any temperature gages. What do you think?”
There’s sarcasm in this question don’t you think?
We can dismiss some points in this question, as they are perhaps an oversimplification, but we really shouldn’t always dismiss climate crisis deniers out of hand, as there are often elements in what they say worth considering.
There are various perspectives out there relating to the heatwave in the UK in 2022, and most are worth exploring. Though your co-hosts aren’t sure it's true in this instance that if some locations don’t have thermometers then you can’t monitor temperatures there, and thus not able to make any decisions about the climate there. Stuart and William feel you can measure temperature in more ways than just having a thermometer. You can measure temperature from satellites etc.
These high temperatures last year were not normal for the parts of the world they are occurring in. In the UK we never really get used to a certain type of weather as it changes so often. It's true there is an adaptation process going on here as there is a change happening, even in the hot countries, already used to hot periods. As those places are regularly even hotter too.
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expand and made more experiential, then set in front of a live audience and arranged to take place next on May 27th at the Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
This subject shouldn’t be brushed under the carpet, it’s in the past, but it has long tentacles into the present, with a lot of family history still buried and never talked about. So is giving birth outside of wedlock really more accepted now? There’s a lot of resentment still it seems towards young women having children outside of marriage, as they are seen by some as a burden on the state and the taxpayer.
A challenging listener question this, from Daphne in Exeter, Devon, England…
“What are your thoughts around women in the UK who were unmarried in the 1960’s and 1970’s and had their children forcibly adopted soon after birth, but now getting a public apology from the government? Many of these women also received subsequent medical treatment and support that was well below a good standard, potentially as a punishment for having a child out of wedlock. Would be interested to hear your thoughts on this sensitive matter”.
This is a big question and as co-hosts Stuart and William are two men in their 40’s and 50’s, so don’t necessarily have full knowledge of the subject. They feel they very rarely have the feeling behind the questions set when in written form, compared with the spoken form, but they gave it a go today.
Having children out of wedlock in the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s was a faux pas, forced adoption was perhaps sometimes seen in some instances as punishment for women who had children out of wedlock. It’s interesting that the government is handing out apologies now, but what does a public apology give to those affected women and children today? Does it really bring it out into the open? Does it reduce the stigma? Is it still an issue now?
Doe’s being born within wedlock and then having your parents split up, make it any more legitimate? There is still a stigma of being from a broken home, that is clear to Stuart and William from personal experience.
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, this podcasts format expand and made more experiential, and then set in front of a live audience and set to take place next on May 27th at the Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
They also discussed their appearance at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market on the 15th April, here is a link to that: https://www.eastoxfordmarket.org.uk/
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Are we the public being subsidized and not the producers as it’s widely thought? When something is cheap you don’t value it. If you pay a bit more, you value it more, right? Stuart and William aren't having a downer on Fishermen in this episode, they just feel more and more that we should be allowing our fisherman a model to fish within that allows them to make good decisions. Fishermen should be paid more so they can perhaps fish less. Fishermen have their hands tied in their own nets.
This discussion was sparked by the following question sent in by listener Ron from Cuddesdon, Oxfordshire, England:
“People say fishermen are actually caring about the environment as they know if they fish too much, the stocks will run out. So, as many stocks are running low, if it's not the fisherman doing it, who is that doesn't care about the environment? Sorry, feeling sarcastic today.”
Fishermen do care, it’s the methods they use that disturbs habitats in Stuart and William’s opinion, it’s how fisherman have to fish to survive sometimes. There’s a lot of unseen fishing going on, and the co-hosts question how much do some fisherman realize they impact the fish stocks?
The market fluctuates, with fish being caught being thrown back as there isn’t money in them, the amount of wastage that is thrown back is incredible. Supermarkets will pay the least amount they can for what they get. Fishermen do care deeply about the environment. but there is a pressure to keep your business going, and they need to work within a sustainable system and model that allows them to make decisions based on the environmental impact, and not can they survive from that day's catch.
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, set to take place on May 27th at the Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
Also during this episode we mention our Redbubble merch page! From mugs to throw pillows, phone cases to T-shirts, check out our Redbubble page and treat yourself or a loved one to something today: redbubble.com/thepeoplescountryside
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Was the hot weather in the UK during the summer of 2022 unprecedented or not? Was it just a hot summer? We’ve always had temperature fluctuations haven’t we?
Some of the key points that came up when co-hosts Stuart and William explored another question sent in by a listener.
They are also intrigued, what are you actually doing when you listen to this podcast? Working, walking the dog, painting, Driving, cleaning?
Anyway, onto the question sent in by Iris in Wetley Rocks, Staffordshire, England: “Will the unprecedented heatwave in the UK and across much of Europe in the summer of 2022 wake people up to climate change whether its man made or not or will people keep saying it's just what happens in summer and another example of generation snowflake not coping?”
Those heat waves during that period may wake some people up, it may also switch people off. It’s potentially an either or situation in many cases, with people either waking up to it or it entrenching belief still further that it isn’t man made or maybe even fake news.
It's true, whether the climate change is man made or not, we need to adapt, but will altering to an adaptation mindset to early lead us to giving us on trying to reverse climate change?
The changing weather pattern is not random, and a big challenge is heat waves don’t last long generally. The weather is transient, which inturn makes it harder to adapt. Parts of Europe that do get long hot summers even to them this heatwave in 2022 was extreme.
Each generation has a set of distractions that the previous generation didn’t, but all generations fell into the stereotyping trap. Using the term ‘Snowflake’ to describe someone with environmental concerns is largely about throwing an insult at someone, and getting emotions involved. This to Stuart and William often indicates the aggressor doesn't always have a good argument, so get personal instead, to distract from that. Snowflake is designed to insult, and not move the conversation on. Insults highlight that your argument isn’t potentially strong enough.
Your co-hosts suggest it's possible some people labeled a snowflake currently, eventually might become realists when we have the benefit of hindsight?
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, the live ticketed incarnation of this podcast format, set to take place on May 27th at the Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Should the Tour De France be doing more to promote the environmental and health benefits of cycling? Is there a missed opportunity here?
Stuart and William discuss this and more as theY explore the following question sent in by listener Karlijn, Teignmouth, Devon:
“The Tour De France in 2022 saw climate protesters disrupt some of the stages (3 actually, as far as I know). Is this a good battle to choose if the bicycle is a clean form of transport, or is there more to this targeting than meets the eye? A lot of sports like skiing who flip flop competitors all over the world could lower their footprint if they took a more logical route. I saw someone also try and glue themselves to the goal posts during a game at the 2022 women's football European Championships. The cameras never focus on the protestors though so this really must impact on the awareness and effectiveness of these protests? The go slow blockades on the UK motorways didn’t receive too much coverage either, so all the congestion and inconvenience caused maybe couldn’t be justified?”
They go on to discuss the responsibility of the Tour de France to promote the health benefits of cycling more widely, and how it can use its platform to encourage more people to take up cycling as a means of transport.
They also explore the importance of effective protest, and the risks of going too far. They also challenge the assumption that all environmentalists are radical activists. It’s not what’s done, it’s how it’s done. It’s not a case of whether protesting should or shouldn’t happen, it’s how it’s done. As part of a free world, we should all be free to protest. If you’ve got a voice you need to use it, but you need to be careful how you use it. There is an assumption that all people who are labeled as an environmentalist glue themselves to the road as a protest.
In this episode Stuart and William were again joined by long time listener Hedley Thorne, who was invited to take his place in the ‘Listeners Chair’, where he sat in and contributed to the recording, and gave his opinions on the topic discussed.
To get your chance of appearing on the podcast and sit in the ‘Listeners Chair’, we have a stretch goal on our Patreon page where once we get to ten Beyond Stereotypes support tier backers, everyone on this tier will be entered into a quarterly draw, and the winner will be offered the opportunity to make an appearance on the podcast.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
Would seeing a variety of people in advertising materials make a big difference? How do we make the countryside more diverse? Is it a matter of people being excluded, or is it a result of cultural factors?
Once again Stuart and William embark on a discussion prompted by a question from a listener, with today’s coming from Kenny in Little Wittenham, Oxfordshire, England. The question is as follows:
“When out walking in the UK you rarely see Asian or Black faces, and I think we need to open the countryside up and make it more diverse. I’m aware when Asian people socialise and go out they go to each other's houses and share food, but there are also socioeconomic barriers too.
So these groups in society stay more local to where they are when they go out. I also think there needs to be more role models for these groups to link with, for example in outdoor clothing marketing, the people wearing the clothes tend to be white people.
Perhaps the models should be more diverse to encourage the uptake of outdoor activities with a wider range of people? Also there are only a handful of walking guides and leaders in the UK that aren't white, perhaps a wider recruitment process needs to be implemented?”
During this discussion, among other topics Stuart and William talk about how growing up in a household that never took you out into nature could affect your likelihood of doing it as an adult, and are we always aware when we’re in nature?
In this episode Stuart and William were again joined by long time listener Hedley Thorne, who was invited to take his place in the ‘Listeners Chair’, where he sat in and contributed to the recording, and gave his opinions on the topic discussed.
To get your chance of appearing on the podcast and sit in the ‘Listeners Chair’, we have a stretch goal on our Patreon page where once we get to ten Beyond Stereotypes support tier backers, everyone on this tier will be entered into a quarterly draw, and the winner will be offered the opportunity to make an appearance on the podcast.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, set to take place on May 27th at the Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
As consumers, how much power do we hold in where we choose to invest our pension money? How much change can we realistically expect to influence within larger corporations?
In today’s conversation which was sparked by the following question from Ron in Cuddesdon, Oxfordshire, England, Stuart and William discuss these points and more:
“I’ve heard asking your personal pension company to only invest in green industries is 21 times more effective in combating climate change than individuals becoming vegans or flying less. Do you agree?”
During the discussion Stuart and William take a closer look at the investments made by pension companies, and how honest they are about the green credentials of those investments. It's no secret that where we put our money has a significant impact on the companies we support. However, how do we know if these companies truly invest in environmentally-friendly initiatives?
As they delve deeper into the topic, they further explore how the green economy is a mosaic of many different things. It's not just about investing in renewable energy, but also about consuming less, flying less, and eating less meat.
In this episode they were joined once again by long time listener Hedley Thorne, who was invited to take his place in the ‘Listeners Chair’, where he sat in and contributed to the recording, and gave his opinions on the topic discussed.
To get your chance of appearing on the podcast and sit in the ‘Listeners Chair’, we have a stretch goal on our Patreon page where once we get to ten Beyond Stereotypes support tier backers, everyone on this tier will be entered into a quarterly draw, and the winner will be offered the opportunity to make an appearance on the podcast.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
During this episode Stuart and William discuss the upcoming Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event, set to take place on May 27th at the Bothy Vineyard in Oxfordshire. To secure your tickets for this event, use the following link: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Why shouldn't a couple of birds ruin the entertainment for thousands of people?
Every year, thousands of people flock to watch the high-speed thrills of motorcycle speedway, but at what cost to the environment? Is it worth sacrificing the habitat of a few Nightjars for the entertainment of the masses?
But here's where things get complicated - it's not just about a couple of birds. It's about a balance - a balance between conservation and entertainment, between preserving habitats and providing jobs and economic growth. As they say, death by a thousand cuts - it's only a few Nightjars, but if we follow that thinking, we can justify any development until their population is wiped out.
So, where do we draw the line? Should we prioritize the needs of the environment or the desires of the people? And why shouldn't an environmentalist also enjoy motorsports? After all, motorcycle speedway is not the most polluting motorsport - the majority of the environmental impact comes from the transporting of the riders around the world.
But then again, perhaps an environmentalist is just a label placed on someone by others. Is it possible to be both a conservationist and a motorsport enthusiast? Can we find a way to strike a balance between these seemingly opposing forces?
This discussion between your co-hosts Stuart and William was sparked by the following question sent in by Daphne in Exeter, Devon, England.
“Stuart, you mention you are interested in the sport of Speedway, what are your thoughts on the failed planning application to build a new venue for Exeter Speedway? It was turned down because rare Nightjar birds that nest nearby would be disturbed. How can a few birds be more important than thousands of people's entertainment? How can you be an environmentalist and still like motorsport?”
In this episode Stuart and William were joined by long time listener Hedley Thorne, who was invited to take his place in the ‘Listeners Chair’, and he sat in and contributed to the recording, and gave his opinions on the topic discussed.
To get your chance of appearing on the podcast and sit in the ‘Listeners Chair’, we have a stretch goal on our Patreon page where once we get to ten Beyond Stereotypes support tier backers, everyone on this tier will be entered into a quarterly draw, and the winner will be offered the opportunity to make an appearance on the podcast.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
In today's episode Stuart and William again talk about Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted happening on the 27th May at the Bothy Vineyard, in Oxfordshire. Here’s a link to book tickets for this event: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3mJyElY , support our work through Patreon https://bit.ly/3JdVCt3 or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Are we too controlling of the environment? We’ll always justify our own actions, so are there really any categorical answers? What makes us different from the rest of the animal kingdom? Is it really so off putting to be talking about us being animals, and is a negative reaction to that based in self determination or fact? We aren’t descended from monkeys, we share a common ancestor, is that true?
Nature isn’t just ‘out there somewhere’, a backdrop to our lives, it's everywhere, at all times, and we are part of the ecosystem, not separate from it. We know when something’s not balanced, but isn’t deciding on what balance is, too much about human centric thinking at times?
Have you ever seen an evil magpie?
All these points flash through the co-hosts' minds as they were faced with another listener question, received from Bart from Tacoma, Washington, USA. Enjoying the freedom to explore their own thoughts on the open mic without the distraction of an invited ‘expert guest’.
The question is as follows: “What is a healthy and balanced ecosystem, and who decides what that is, and when humans should step in to assist/manage/restore/develop?”
We are part of nature and not separate from it, and we are as much part of the ecosystem of any particular place, as the birds and the bees are. So when confronted with maintenance of a nature reserve say, do we manage what an area is now, return it to what it was, or do we turn it into something we want it to be or feel it should be?
It’s very hard to know what a healthy and balanced ecosystem is, but we can feel when the balance has been tipped, but often divorce ourselves from responsibility and involvement in tipping points. We need to understand what we do or don’t do both have impacts. We need to allow death and decay to readily be part of ecosystems, and not wash them away.
We perhaps need to appreciate the natural order of things. Sometimes some things dominate, so when should we step in? We’ve been so disruptive to ecosystems, so do we actually need to step in to aid biodiversity, or take a step back?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
In today's episode Stuart and William again talk about Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted happening on the 27th May at the Bothy Vineyard, in Oxfordshire. Here’s a link to book tickets for this event: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
We can all be guilty of limited thinking and unconscious bias, but where and at what point does an open mind become detrimental? There’s not enough time in the day to take every opportunity on, and we need to remember balance is a goal, not a struggle.
A deeply philosophical question today, which has come in for Stuart and William to chat about from Samia, from Tlemcen, in Algeria, here it is:
“Should we always leave space and prioritise consciously and subconsciously expanding our minds, or are there times that other aspects of life should be prioritised over expanding our minds? If its the latter, perhaps our default positions should ideally be do these non mind expanding things with an open mind at the very least, as often as possible? Is there enough time in a day to take on all the mind expanding opportunities presented to us anyway, and if we tried, other aspects of life, that bring balance, could be neglected? You’ve said in the podcast before that not all opportunities are opportunities, can I ask, are these questions I raise an example of some opportunities being distractions depending on when they arise etc, and do we have time in any given day to take all opportunities, in all their forms, that we are presented with anyway?
Surely everything expands our minds, everything expands our horizons, and we can’t avoid that? It’s best to do everything with an open mind as often as possible, but an open mind can also be indecisiveness in another guise, it’s an excuse potentially, and we can actively be doing nothing. Reframing our whole life to quickly around new information can be detrimental, so maybe it's better to incorporate it into how you live and work, and not reinvent the wheel every day?
In today's episode Stuart and William again talk about Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted happening on the 27th May at the Bothy Vineyard, in Oxfordshire. Here’s a link to book tickets for this event: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
We need to get used to change, and there appears to be 19 US states not wanting to change, and reduce their pollution. Is this really a republican issue, or is it a wider than that?
Maybe these 19 states need guiding through this change in a more supportive way with clearer pathways, and maybe, just maybe, these can help reduce resistance to change?
These points of discussion were instigated by another question sent in by Paco in Wimbledon, England, here it is:
“I’m now hearing that the Supreme Court in the US has voted to limit President Biden's power to cut emissions. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has lost some of its power to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.The landmark ruling by the US Supreme Court represents a major setback. Biden called it a "devastating decision" but said it would not undermine his effort to tackle the climate crisis. The case against the EPA was brought by West Virginia on behalf of 18 other mostly Republican-led states and some of the nation's largest coal companies. They argued that the agency did not have the authority to limit emissions across whole states. These 19 states were worried their power sectors would be forced to move away from using coal, at a severe economic cost. In a 6-3 ruling, the court sided with the conservative states and fossil-fuel companies, agreeing that the EPA did not have the authority to impose such sweeping measures. Environmental groups will be deeply concerned by the outcome as historically the 19 states that brought the case have made little progress on reducing their emissions - which is necessary to limit climate change. It means President Biden is now relying on a change of policy from these states or a change from Congress - otherwise the US is unlikely to achieve its climate targets. This is a significant loss for the president who entered office on a pledge to ramp up US efforts on the environment and climate. On his first day in office he re-entered the country into the Paris Agreement, the first legally-binding universal agreement on climate change targets. And he committed the country to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 52% by 2030 against 2005 levels. Please cover this and also the fact that maybe we should all start to get used to paying more for fuels. Here in the UK the cost of heating our homes, maybe thats something we should get used to and not expect it to go down? Maybe instead of getting home based fuel costs down isn’t the answer, maybe we should be insulating our homes better so we need less fuel and heating. Two seemingly different issues but related I feel”.
It’s a long question but co-hosts Stuart and William break it down into bite sized palatable chunks. Among other things examining if the EPA in the US is not having the power they probably should have, and whether it is in fact a toothless tiger.
In today's episode Stuart and William again talk about Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted happening on the 27th May at the Bothy Vineyard, in Oxfordshire. Here’s a link to book tickets for this event: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out more about our project through the following link https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Do private individuals realise the impact of their own CCTV and other monitoring devices? Do we really need to be capturing everything that goes on around our lives and homes? It's said cameras can aid crime prevention, though being watched all the time can lead to paranoia, and here in the UK we seem to be one of the most watched nations in the world. Do you have any thoughts around being monitored? Perhaps you feel if you’re not doing anything wrong, you’ve got nothing to hide? Is this really true?
Regular listener Paco from Wimbledon, England has sent in another question for Stuart and William to explore and it goes like this:
“In the UK I often hear it said it's a police state and that we’re monitored by CCTV and other cameras. I also hear most footage captured is done so by private cameras on our own homes or work premises, and via dashcams these days. 96% of UK cameras are private as our homes are bristling with tech and monitoring devices. Maybe those saying we live in a police state, or those concerned about how the state can monitor us, should target their words towards us private individuals not the state?"
Your co-hosts discuss that there does seem to be more CCTV these days with private door bells, dash cams etc, so why wouldn't the police and others tap into this footage?
More people got the video doorbell technology during lockdown to reduce social contact, so is this the thin end of the wedge with CCTV easily leading to totalitarianism. This footage is potentially open to abuse, and not just by the police or government etc. Some people make the big jump from CCTV coverage to the novel 1984, is that too big a jump, too soon?
Back in the 1980’s radio personality and journalist Bill Heine said he never put his name down on things where it could be stored in a master database somewhere, did he have a point that monitoring comes in many forms, and the line between privacy and traceability is often too blurred?
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. There are so many avenues to explore with this question today and all the other listener questions lined up that fill our schedule until the Autumn of 2023 already.
This podcast clearly has a healthy future, and as such, to keep things fresh, we’re going to be working with 14 or more interns from Oxford University, to keep the new ideas flowing, which stops things getting stale.
What do you make of this discussion today? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In today's episode Stuart and William talk further about Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted which is happening on the 27th May at the Bothy Vineyard, in rural Oxfordshire. Here’s a link to book tickets for this event: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
How can you avoid the pitfalls of subservience and oppression? What does being born to lead really mean? Doesn’t it lead to egotism?
These are just a few of the questions Stuart and William discuss as they explore the following question that was sent by listener Alex in Poland:
“Does the reaction to the Queen's death show how a society could be subservient to its oppressor? Is this Stockholm Syndrome in daily life?”
They go on to talk about how royalty often exists off the back of colonialism and power, together with how you can understand other people better by understanding your own history, good and bad. Plus how the royal family are just another family, they’re no higher than us really, and that we shouldn’t feel too subservient to them.
They explore why there is often deference to a perceived higher power and if in the UK we’re an oppressed as society? Neither Stuart and William are royalists and call for the bad stuff from the past to be acknowledged so we can all move on?
Do you have to accept being lead? Big questions!
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode they talk about Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted which is happening on the 27th May at the Bothy Vineyard, in rural Oxfordshire. Here’s a link to book tickets for this event: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Are impulsive purchases just filling up a hole in our lives? Are those impulsive moments just to get the rush of a new purchase, the thrill of buying that new object?
“What do you think about people who purchase things because they just like gadgets, but don’t really need the item?”
A very straightforward question sent in by Bobby in Pasadena, California, USA, which leads to an in depth discussion between Stuart and William you co-hosts.
They really dig into what impulse buying is from their own perspectives, and where it potentially comes from, what the motivations are around it could be, and they also touch upon the effect tech has on our daily lives.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Get yourself a ticket for the live (unrecorded) incarnation of this podcast today! Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, which is happening on the 27th May at the Bothy Vineyard, in rural Oxfordshire, will be an event to stretch your thinking, explore opportunities and build lasting links with people who want to make a difference. If we find solutions to some of the big issues we all face, that will be a bonus. The event is more designed to get various people together, and give space for opportunities to manifest through conversation and connections.
Here’s a link to book tickets for this event: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
This event will be a fundraiser for the organization Wild Oxfordshire with 50% of the profits being donated to them.
Wild Oxfordshire is all about bringing people together, to do the best thing for nature on their patch. They collaborate with numerous individuals, communities and organizations, offering expertly collected and inspiring information, bespoke advice, and nature-based solutions.
Find out all about The People’s Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
It’s the 400th episode of the podcast! Thanks to everyone who listens, and everyone who sends in questions for discussion on this podcast.
The following is a question that was sent in for Stuart and William to discuss by Ron in Cuddesdon, Oxfordshire, England.
“I notice you record so you capture the ambient noise in the background and you leave the bleeped out swearing in. Most other podcasts don’t, so why do you? Do you think it's a distraction for the listener? Do you think it's a weakness that you’re not experts in what you talk about? Mind you, I don’t know how you could be, as the questions set by listeners are so varied? You could though release less so you could research each question more, but that could lose some of your off the cuff dynamic though. Some of your views, statements and claims, are maybe unfounded, but as you are aiming to get people thinking through the podcast, maybe that's your aim?”
During this discussion they talk about why they keep ambient sound in recordings, the pitfalls of swearing on podcasts and how it’s perceived differently around the world. Together with how they don’t try to pretend to be something they are not, and are always attempting to get you thinking about the big issues in the world.
In this episode they talk about Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted which is happening on the 27th May at the Bothy Vineyard, in rural Oxfordshire. Here’s a link to book tickets for this event: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Trigger Warning: The topic of male suicide is discussed in this episode. If this is a subject that you’ll find difficult to listen to, then this might not be the episode for you right now?
This subject was raised by listener Alex from Poland, who sent in the following question for us to discuss:
“Not listened to your podcast in a long long time, but nice to see you are still going. I see I’ve got a lot of listening to catch up on. Could you discuss the serious subject of male suicide and its potential hidden threat?”
Neither Stuart or William are experts on this subject, but have both had experiences of suicide and mental health, which they draw on in this episode.
The in depth conversation that was sparked by this question lead Stuart and William to talk about some of the various aspects of suicide, not just male suicide. They also to talk about mental health as well, with one of the conclusions being that its potentially best to take the gender out of it, we perhaps need to talk more about suicide in general?
During this episode they mention the previous episode Leon’s Law, here’s a link to that episode: https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/episode/7d34ea5df6bf1b840edc5aa1963b9039eeb198e7/view
They also talk about Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, which is happening on the 27th May at the Bothy Vineyard, here’s a link to book tickets for this event: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/environmental-debate-live-unscripted-tickets-514832145807
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
A very different discussion, from one of the many varied questions that are sent into us by you, the listeners.
In this episode Stuart and William mull over the following question from Ron in Cuddesdon, Oxfordshire, England:
“Not asked you a question since November 2020 but got a cracker for you. Hope another listener hasn’t asked this? How important is a good credit rating to you personally?”
While Stuart doesn’t care at all about his credit rating, as he’s never really had one, and tries to live outside ‘the system’ as much as possible. Stuart has never thought about doing or not doing something as it might affect his credit rating. He just gets on and lives life. William knows what his is, through his credit card, but really doesn’t know what to make of it. Maybe if you’ve got a bad credit rating, it’s likely that you’ve not tried to do anything about it?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
As a species we like a sterile, safe and controlled environment, that’s maybe why we detach ourselves from nature? It’s a form of control.
This is just one of the conclusions Stuart and William came to as they discussed the following question from listener Ignacio in Peru:
“Is there a defined time when man started to see himself outside of nature and not part of it, or was it a steady evolution? To me the advent of agriculture and harvesting crops was a key point, as from there it seems if a piece of land and wildlife is under the influence of man then it's considered outside of nature, and the stuff outside of man's influence is nature. As you guys have said in previous episodes though, almost all habitats look how they do because of man's influence, but is that really a good measure of what is nature and what isn’t, and why do we insist on seeing ourselves outside of it? Maybe the writers of the world should include the message more that we are part of it and not separate?”
During this episode the co-hosts go on to discuss the very humancentric concern about the pointlessness of life, and how in the end everything lives and dies, begins and ends. They discuss how at times everything outside of human control can be perceived as dangerous, if we choose that mindset, and how it’s the narrative that we use that separates us from nature, a narrative that can make us feel that we’re superior.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Often Stuart and William’s views, statements and claims, are maybe unfounded, but their aim through this podcast, and other outlets, is to get you thinking about how we can help tackle the world scale problems we all face.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Though the specific subjects discussed generally come from the questions that you the listeners are sending in, with today’s question which Stuart and William discuss and mull over, coming from Kenny, in Little Wittenham, Oxfordshire, England. The question is as follows:
“China has gone for a testing instead of a vaccination approach to try and beat Covid. This means there's an immune disparity between China and the rest of the world. Do you think China’s borders will ever open again how they were, or an opportunity to be more insular?”
During this episode Stuart and William discuss this topic by asking the question, can you really be an insular country, as we now live in a globally connected world?
They go on to explore how the Chinese are being accused of not being honest about their stats, and the West are being accused of bending the truth. Also pointing out how China has the power and influence to generate movements and systems that can help them, and the rest of the world.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
The countryside isn’t always spoken about on this podcast, even though it’s in the name, due to the conversations generally being based around the questions sent in by you the listener, so you help set the direction and agenda of the discussions we have. This episode is no exception to that rule.
This discussion between Stuart and William is framed around the idea of the differences between compensation, support, and setting up new funding systems. Together with is there a finite end for financial support?
They talk about how compensation for example can be seen as the blame game, which just gets people’s backs up as it indicates someone is always wronged, and can also play into a victim complex. They expand into how support is more than just giving money, it's about skills, partnerships and well targeted ideas too, and that new funding systems could lead to more clarity.
This discussion was sparked by the following question, sent in by listener Russ in Harcourt Hill, Oxford, England:
“At COP27 in Egypt it was suggested the larger countries that have mainly caused human influenced climate change should compensate smaller countries and economies who are being impacted the most with climate change. Should we be playing the blame game or setting up a new funding system to help the most impacted people to adapt? Isn’t seeking a compensation approach, which could be open ended, delaying getting funding to the needy in this emergency?”
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Today’s listener question, from Paco in Wimbledon, London, England, was a tricky one for Stuart and William to tackle, as after all they’re two men talking about an issue that they’ll never have direct experience of. They do however try their best to tackle this particular subject from an as objective a viewpoint as possible, as life is rarely black and white.
Here is the question that was set by Paco:
“Heard the conservative Supreme Court in the USA has overturned the Rowe/Wade ruling in 1973, with some hoping abortion is now made illegal in every US state. The US president has said this ruling could set America back 150 years. What are your views on all abortion and do you think these extreme decisions about abortion, gun laws and climate change in the US are a driver for a second US civil war? Not like the first where you had 2 armies facing each other, but more around political violence, like what happened when Trump lost his Presidency.”
During this episode Stuart in particular recounts a powerful story about his own Mother, and how he himself could have been aborted. They both go into how making abortion illegal will make it more unsafe potentially, and how giving up a child must be one of the hardest things to do in life, particularly when you have no support from your family.
William also has strong views that the ultimate choice is down to the women, or should be at least. It’s an ethical and unethical choice but shouldn’t the mother decide that?
Both Stuart and William feel regarding abortions, it’s not what is done, it’s the way it’s done, particularly when it’s done in secrecy. They question if there’s a social, economic or race divide?
Is the abortion debate too much about telling women what to do with their bodies? When does an outside opinion step in? When is it right to allow it to happen? When is the right time to step in? When is it right to take a step back? When do we step in? Should we step in? It feels to Stuart and William that society has an opinion about abortion yet when you’re born and out of the womb, you’re on your own.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Another great question from one of our long standing listeners, this time it’s from Ivy, in Worthing, West Sussex, England. The question is as follows:
“Is there a shortage of volunteers now, in our societal hour of need? Are people fed up with volunteering, maybe having done loads of it during the Covid situation?”
The discussion between your co-hosts Stuart and William mainly revolves around why people perhaps volunteered more during the initial stages of Covid, together with why there now could be a shortage in volunteers, which could be due to burnout, the impact of Brexit, or also due to people having more things to do now, particularly since the easing of COVID lockdowns.
This conversation includes ideas why volunteers can experience burnout, especially if they are leant on too heavily, and how the roles could be made more interesting, varied and flexible. They also go on to cover a number of actions that could be taken to counteract this possible far reaching issue, including a suggestion for you if you’re thinking about volunteering, but don’t have very spare time to do so.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This episode almost spills into a debate, can you believe it? Though it really is more William having a rant about today’s subject, which was sparked by the following question, sent in by listener Kenny, in Little Wittenham, Oxfordshire, England.
“Any views on the parties that happened in Downing Street, when the public were told to stay at home?”
William feels that at the time there was an abject failure to tell the truth, and that there was a denial of the facts. He gets quite animated in this episode, whereas Stuart is a lot calmer, mainly down to the fact that he wasn’t surprised that the rules were broken, and that politicians don’t generally tell the whole truth anyway.
During the discussion they go on to talk about how clarity within government is important, how fundamentally it all comes down to integrity, and they ask the question, “Are the current government really just playing at being in power?”
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
On this podcast we always aim to give you a balanced view, we always discuss the topic in hand from our own truths, and never shy away from the big topics.
In today’s episode Stuart and William discuss the following question which has been sent in by listener Vera in New Hinksey, Oxford, England.
“Feels like the 1970’s all over again with high inflation and strikes. What are your thoughts on recent rail strikes? The government says the industry needs modernising, yet rail workers seem to say that's a euphemism, really meaning costs need to be cut in the face of another recession, and the best way to do that is to cut wages. Is cutting costs really modernisation? Tourists are saying they are being screwed over by having transport reduced, but isn’t that just part of being a backpacker or a tourist?”
The discussion that naturally unfolded between Stuart and William from this question revolves around ideas of what modernisation on the railway in particular means, for example how it can be a euphemism of getting rid of workers. It can seem that costs are being taken out of the system regardless of that's making it better. The human element is the biggest cost it seems, and reduction of staff is being seen as a way of modernizing. They also compare what is happening now to what happened in the 1970s here in the UK, exploring the similarities and differences. There was a different set of circumstances in the 1970’s, that weren’t too long after the second world war, but the emotions are the same in many cases.
During this episode William mentions the other podcast he co-hosts with Tommy Serafinski of the Tommy's Outdoors podcast, here is a link to that joint show Have You Ever Considered?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
A quite nostalgic episode, where both Stuart and William share with you their favorite parts of the county of Oxfordshire, where they both were born, live, and grew up.
This nostalgia was prompted by the question below sent in by Kenny, in Little Wittenham, Oxfordshire, England.
“As an Oxford based podcast, what parts of the Oxfordshire county do you both like the best?”
We recommend you listen to this episode to hear which parts of the county that both Stuart and William like the best, as they list some interesting and potentially less known areas.
What we’d like to know is do you have a favorite part of Oxfordshire, or whatever area you live in or are from? Why not email us at thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message. You could also record us a question for discussion on this podcast.
The overall themes of the show are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
You can find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Finally help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
If you’re looking to get into drone photography, this episode is very much for you. Also, we’d recommend you listen through to the end, as there’s a funny story about a drone and a boat.
The following question, that sparked this meandering conversation about drones, was set by listener Ken, in Leek, Staffordshire, England.
“How’s the drone flying going William, and any tips for us mere mortals, just starting out and cutting our teeth?”
As you can see, it was very much directed at co-host William, it did however lead to an in depth discussion about drone photography, covering the laws and ethics of this practice, how it enables you to get a camera into locations you wouldn’t normally be able to reach, and how it has brought down the cost of aerial photography. The conversation raises the need to remember you’re a pilot of an aircraft when flying a drone, and should always be mindful when you fly the drone, what impact it will have on the people, and wildlife around you.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Where did Elon Musk go wrong?”
Could there be a more polarizing figure in recent times than Elon Musk? Both his supporters and detractors feel they know the man best, but who really knows? The task of exploring this conundrum is taken up by Stuart and William in this episode, as they attempt to answer the question above, set by listener Bella from Bermondsey, London, England, which she recorded in her own voice for us at a promotional stall at the end of 2022 at the East Oxford Farmers’ and Community Market.
Stuart starts from the position of not knowing anything, or very little about the man, whereas William thinks he knows who he is. So with that in mind, throughout this conversation Stuart challenges William’s assumptions, digging into where they originated from, and where William’s opinions of Musk came from.
Stuart was keen to explore how we engage with people in the public eye, and what they are actually like as people, and the ingrained habits at play regarding how we are forming our opinions of them? Can any of us really have a rounded view of someone Musk due to the influence of the media? The episode begs the question, can we truly form a balanced or categorical view of the person until we meet them? Even then, some might say the accuracy of our opinions are exposed to and still have limiting factors at play on them, influencing the formation of those views.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Another great and varied question sent in by one of our listeners prompted both Stuart and William to reminisce about their favourite parts of the UK.
One conclusion they come to during this discussion is that you don’t need to go far in the UK for the landscape to really change, they recommend you to steer yourself away from the more touristic areas such as London as there are some real hidden gems to be found, and as always they encourage you to get out into the countryside.
This whole trip around the country was sparked by the below question sent in by Pedro from Portugal:
“Nice to hear my name mentioned, and being the butt of many a joke in your episodes. I’m not a microchip salesman by the way, but will leave you guessing as to what I do. Not asked a question for a long while, just enjoying hearing all the other listener questions and you two having a go at discussing them. So my question is, I’m heading for the UK to visit family. What areas would you recommend whilst I’m there?”
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Before you listen to this episode, it’s worth considering that this was recorded in October 2022, and as you’re aware; the world has moved on, quite significantly.
So with that in mind, Stuart and William tried their best at the time to predict the future, by answering the following three questions:
- Is Liz Truss still in power?
- Is Jeremy Hunt still the chancellor?
- Has a general election been announced?
Listen till the end, where you’ll find out what Stuart and William predicted, and whether they got any of the answers right or wrong. Spoiler alert, it’s a bit of a mixed bag.
This whole discussion was prompted by the following question, that was sent in by listener Terry from Watlington, Oxfordshire, England.
“I wonder how people (especially Conservative voters) feel about the sweeping changes Liz Truss, the UK Prime Minister is implementing? By the time you do this question she may have lost her job though?”
Topics that were covered include, hypocrisy within government, how Liz Truss was at first supported by her party, but then wasn’t. The anti growth coalition. Stuart in particular speaks of how humanity doesn’t like change, it’s always resistant to change in all its forms, and yet we’re talking about constantly changing the Prime Minister, and we’re seemingly happy with that. So do we really like change, or don’t we?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are here to wish you a Happy New Year and all the best for 2023.
They also invite you to look back on 2022, and ask the question: What is your highlight of the past year? What is the one thing that will define the year?
You can find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are taking a step back for the month of December to rest and recuperate over the Christmas and New Year periods.
So, instead of the usual discussion style, they’ve each picked four episodes that they feel you and they would like to or should listen to, either again, or maybe for the very first time.
In this, the eighth and final episode in the mini series they’ve called December Reflections, Stuart has chosen the episode that was originally released on the 26th September 2022. It marks the launch of the Indigenous Voices mini series.
Both Stuart and William felt privileged to have Chase as the first guest of this series, as he’s such a great orator and storyteller, and for that reason alone this is a great episode to listen to again.
They hope next year, if the stars align, that Chase will be a guest on the panel for Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted, the live (but not recorded) in person iteration of the podcast, which is currently being planned for late May 2023.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Happy Christmas for yesterday! Stuart and William wish you a very Merry Christmas as they share some random facts about both Boxing Day and cheese! We hope you have a great festive period.
You can find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Merry Christmas from all of us at The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, we wish you the best for the festive period, and beyond.
As you may be aware, Stuart and William are taking a step back for the month of December, to rest and recuperate over the Christmas and New Year periods.
So, instead of the usual discussion style of output, they’ve each picked four episodes that they feel you and they would like to or should listen to, either again, or maybe for the very first time.
In this, the seventh of eight episodes, in the mini series they’ve called December Reflections, William has chosen the episode that was originally released on the 20th June 2021 where they discuss the idea of whether Britain is a pretend democracy. He felt that due to the recent happenings within government in the UK over the past year, that the subjects discussed here are worth hearing again.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark International Human Solidarity Day, in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
Solidarity is identified in the Millennium Declaration as one of the fundamental values of international relations in the 21st Century, wherein those who either suffer or benefit least deserve help from those who benefit most. Consequently, in the context of globalization and the challenge of growing inequality, the strengthening international solidarity is indispensable.
You can find out more about this day here: International Human Solidarity Day | United Nations
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are taking a small step back for the month of December to rest and recuperate over the festive period.
So instead of the usual discussion, they’ve each picked four episodes that they feel you and they would like to or should listen to, either again, or maybe for the very first time.
In this, the sixth of eight episodes, in the mini series they’ve called December Reflections, Stuart has chosen an episode from this year, 2022, in particular the very first iteration of the Beyond Stereotypes mini series, released on the 8th June.
He chose this one as he feels that our guests for this inaugural episode raised some really interesting, and relatable points in relation to activists and activism.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are taking a small step back this month, to rest and recuperate over the Christmas and New Year periods.
So instead of the usual discussion, they’ve each picked four episodes that they feel you and they would like to or should listen to, either again, or maybe for the very first time.
In this, the fifth of eight episodes, in the December Reflections mini series, William has picked an episode that was originally released on the 5th July 2020.
He chose this particular one as the discussion is around the profound idea of our perceptions of nature, in particular what is a good animal and what is bad. They confront the very human centric thinking we all have on a daily basis, in particular about the Magpie.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark World Energy Conservation Day, in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
World Energy Conservation Day is celebrated on the 14th December globally, highlighting the importance of energy consumption and its use in our day-to-day life, its scarcity and its impact on the sustainability of global ecosystems. It focuses our attention on significant issues facing the future of mankind with respect to energy.
This Day serves to spell out a sense of urgency on the issues involved.
You can find out more about this day here: World Energy Conservation Day
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are taking a well deserved step back for the month of December, to rest and recuperate over the Christmas and New Year period.
So, instead of the usual discussion, they’ve each picked four episodes that they feel you and they would like to or should listen to, either again, or maybe for the very first time.
In this, the fourth of eight episodes, in the mini series they’ve called December Reflections, Stuart has chosen the episode that was originally released on the 30th August 2022 where they discussed the following question from listener Lyn in Australia, "Is disability a barrier to having your voice heard in the climate emergency debate?".
Stuart chose this particular episode as when listening back to it, he was quite struck by the points both he and William raised, and to him he this is one of the best questions that has ever been set by a listener of the podcast.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are taking a small step back for the month of December to rest and recuperate over the Christmas period.
So instead of the usual discussion, they’ve each picked four episodes that they feel you and they would like to or should listen to, either again, or maybe for the very first time.
In this, the third episode of eight, in the mini series they’ve called December Reflections, William’s picked the episode that we released on the 14th January 2020, and he chose it as he feels it's a very significant one.
Its significance is that this was the very first episode where Stuart and William discuss a question sent in directly from a listener, which has subsequently become a staple and direction of this podcast during the Covid crisis and beyond.
Listener questions are still the focus of this podcast, even now, and we thank each and every listener who stepped forward especially during Covid, as you kept this podcast going. We have over 60 listener questions still to get through, which will take us to September 2023, so that really helps secure the future of this podcast.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are taking a small step back for the month of December, to rest and recuperate over the Christmas season.
So instead of the usual discussion, they’ve each picked four past episodes that they feel you and they would like to or should listen to, either again, or maybe for the very first time.
In this second episode of eight, in the mini series they’ve called December Reflections, Stuart’s picked an episode from the 9th August 2020, which was recorded between the first and second COVD lockdowns in the UK.
Stuart chose this one because even though he was a little bit fractious at the time, he felt he was perhaps more willing to explore the harder, and maybe harsher truths of life. They particularly explore in this episode the inclusion and maybe under recognized habit of using warlike rhetoric within activism. Is this the best way, or even the only option of getting the message across?
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark World Soil Day, in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
World Soil Day 2022 (#WorldSoilDay) and its campaign "Soils: Where Food Begins" aims to raise awareness of the importance of maintaining healthy ecosystems and human well-being, by addressing the growing challenges in soil management, increasing soil awareness and encouraging societies to improve soil health.
You can read more about this important day here: World Soil Day | United Nations
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William are taking a small step back for the month of December, to rest and recuperate over the Christmas season.
So instead of the usual discussion they have each picked four past episodes that they feel you and they would like to or should listen to, either again, or maybe for the very first time.
In this first of what they’ve called the December Reflections series, William has selected the very first episode of this podcast. Originally released via Soundcloud only on the 25th July 2018, it was then subsequently re-released on all the major podcast platforms on the 21st July 2019.
In this episode they welcomed guest Pete Hughes, who at the time was working for The Oxford Mail.
Three questions were discussed that day which were.
- How much effect do humans have on other animal's survival? Are we causing more extinction than before?
- Is human existence always at a cost to nature and is talking about how bad the state of nature is really making a difference?
- Is eating animals bad for the environment?
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark National Pollution Control Day, in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
National Pollution Control Day is celebrated every year on the 2nd of December in India,
in order to honor and memorialize thousands of human beings who had lost their lives because of the Bhopal gas disaster. It focuses on preventing pollution and raising awareness about the ways we keep exploiting mother nature.
You can find out more about this day here: All You Need To Know About National Pollution Control Day (drishtiias.com)
During this bonus episode William mentions the episode where Julie Macken was their guest, here is a link to that episode: The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast with guest Julie Macken Deputy Queen Bee of Neve's Bees.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Simple question lads, just interested to know, who edits this podcast and how do you do it?”.
In this short episode, Stuart and William talk through the process of creating this podcast. From the recording, through to the editing, the writing of each episode title and bio, through to release.
They talk about how the process is simple, and how they try to keep a good cache of material to keep ahead of the curve with releases.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What’s the best photo that either of you have taken?”
Stuart and William discuss what are the best photos they have ever taken. This discussion was sparked by the above question which was sent in by Iris in Wetley Rocks, Staffordshire, England.
They talk about the various photos they’ve taken over the years that they particularly like. As a photographer William in particular has a few photos which he feels are his best. They go on to talk about photography in general, introducing a particular image that William thinks as one of the best, of all time.
The photo he mentions is by the photographer Pennie Smith, and in particular a photo taken of the rock band The Clash, which became the cover artwork for the band’s album London Calling. Here is a link to that artwork: Wikipedia.org/LondonCalling
You can also see the bass guitar featured in the shot, and the photo, on display in the World City Gallery at the Museum of London. You can find out more about this with the following link: museumoflondon.org.uk/paulsiminonssmashedbass
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Is it already too late to save ourselves? People keep saying this is the last chance to deal with the climate and ecological emergency we face, but isn’t that where they go wrong, as they keep saying it?
Last year they said it was the last chance, and this year they say the same. Is moving the deadline of the last chance undermining the message? Humans tend to crap in their own backyard in pursuit of money, regardless of what's down the line.
In the end we tend to wake up and realise, but too often that doesn't happen until it's too late. Is it worth still trying to save ourselves, or just give up, without even trying to adapt?”
Stuart and William once again embark on a discussion framed around a question sent in by a listener. Today’s question, which you can see above, was sent in by Paco from Wimbledon, Greater London, England.
In each episode they aim to stop the big issues disappearing into the shadows, and open the door to the tough conversations.
They discuss the ideas around what a last chance really means when it comes to the climate crisis, and how we need to reach a critical mass to make real change happen.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/3Avt0b4 , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“It’s all very well consumers purchasing products and services that are more sustainable, but isn’t that just pratting about at the edges of the challenge? What we need to focus on is the big economic and political stuff. Yes we can fly less and eat less meat, as those industries have big impacts until they change and evolve, but limiting the use of plastic cups, changing our cotton buds, etc etc, is ineffective pratting about at the edges of the issues we face.
I agree though, as consumers we can make a difference, but we’re too often distracted by miniscule pathetic micro consumerist improvements we can make as individuals, by those who want to perpetuate a system, and set of processes, that are innately toxic to humankind. We need to overhaul and overthrow the systems and the capitalist drivers behind all this.
When was GDP ever a good sensible measure of the population's wellbeing? Yet that's the main focus of most governments, boosting GDP. That system’s already destructive yet we want to grow it, double it and then, wait for it, quadruple it again. The poor don’t get richer as the rich get richer, (which is what Mrs Truss, your Prime Minister in the UK still seems to be hoping) rather the poor die out and the rich get poorer, as they don’t have anyone to make their wealth out of.
Perpetual growth will kill most of us off, it's madness, do you two agree with that? Ecological restoration and rewilding will draw down huge amounts of the carbon, and make the world nicer, yet as there's less profit in it, so we don’t do it.
The ultimate floor in profit and perpetual growth systems is they die as their fuel burns out. Like our sun will. Any thoughts?”
The above is a fantastically thought out question from listener Adriana in Utrecht, in the Netherlands, which Stuart and William discuss in wide ranging conversation, talking about consumerism, the influence of the media, and whether GDP is really the true measure of success and a population's wellbeing?
Are we really just pratting around the edges when it comes to buying greener products, are we really making a difference? We need to get into the habit of taking on personal responsibility: for example, we don’t need to just fly less, we need to do everything less, we need to do everything sustainably.
There’s also the clothing industry and its impact to the environment, as that’s even bigger than say the flight industry and shipping industry combined. Though its impacts are hidden away, whereas you can see the planes in the sky. It’s time we all took responsibility for how we act and what we buy, but also a responsibility to put pressure on the decision makers to make the changes needed.
During this episode William mentions the youTube channel Kurzgesagt, and in particular one of their videos, here is a link to that episode title The Last Human – A Glimpse Into The Far Future.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Has Brexit proven to be a good or a bad thing? I’ve heard there could be mass civil disobedience in the UK, with increasing home energy costs in Autumn 2022. Resulting in many people refusing to pay their bills. Is this a good idea?”
During every episode of this podcast your hosts explore and delve into the challenges we all face, and this iteration is no acception.
Stuart and William have a very honest discussion which was sparked by the above question sent in by listener Elaine in Telford, Shropshire, England.
They talk around Brexit in particular, and how it’s hard to see where its effects start and end due to many other factors, including the war in Ukraine, and the COVID pandemic for example.
To be clear and upfront, Stuart didn’t vote at all in 2016 EU referendum, though a lot of people thought that if he had his vote would have gone to leaving. William on the other hand did vote to remain as he looked at Europe through an historical lens, and that there has been no significant conflicts between the nations of the continent since the foundations of the current EU were put into place, post world war 2.
This episode isn’t just about Brexit though as they move onto the subject of civil disobedience around the world, how people want to set up their own systems to live off grid, and the cost of living.
This podcast's overarching themes are always nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark World Kindness Day, in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
World Kindness Day is to highlight good deeds in the community, focusing on the positive power and the common thread of kindness for good, which binds us. Kindness is a fundamental part of the human condition, which bridges the divides of race, religion, politics, gender and location.
Here are a couple of links about the day:
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Kindness_Day
World Kindness Day: https://kindnessuk.com/world_kindness_day_kindness_day_uk.php
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What’s important?”
Watch out, there is a slightly ridiculous and loud start to this episode! You’ve been warned!
Inspired by the question above, sent in by listener Fanaka from Kenya.
During this short discussion your hosts Stuart and William tackle what is a quite deep and profound subject. Starting from the very top, which William asserts he believes is happiness is important, with Stuart asking, if happiness really is achievable, and what happiness even is in the first place?
Throughout this episode they bring up many ideas that they believe to be important, do you agree with them? For example honesty, good relationships, having a good general balance, and a good work life balance. They end up asking the question, what’s important to you?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Seems a bit strange that some countries want to leave the Commonwealth, but still have the Queen as head of state, and that some countries like Mozambique want to join this group of nations, without really being part of the old British empire”.
This discussion as a whole is mainly framed around whether or not the Commonwealth is still relevant, and what both the pros and cons of membership are.
Stuart and William took the accuracy of the above question, sent in by Trevor in Wood Farm, Oxford, England, very much at face value, and their resulting recorded discussion shows that they don’t have a strong knowledge of the true Commonwealth concept, and nor do many listeners it seems.
During subsequent research after the recording, which was the action suggested during the episode, they found that Mozambique is actually already a member of the Commonwealth, as is South Africa, which neither Stuart or William were sure about. The fact that Mozambique was a British Colony but not constitutionally governed by Britain was another subsequent piece of learning, and you’ll note William didn’t feel during the recording that Mozambique was even a former colony.
Stuart and William always try to be proactive podcast presenters, and continue to look at these questions even after the recording sessions end, so they continue their learning. We hope these discussions inspire you too to keep learning about the issues raised in this podcast's output, even when the episodes conclude.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Was the pollution caused, and costs incurred by staging a four day Platinum Jubilee celebration, justified, due to it being a special occasion?”
Stuart and William take a deep dive into the above question, sent in by listener Trevor in Wood Farm, Oxford, England.
During this discussion they set out some strong challenges for you the listener to consider.
Was this public celebration event really that good for morale generally? Was it a wise move to celebrate the platinum jubilee when people are struggling? Are some events more important than others? Was it justified to have a four day platinum jubilee? There was a large display of jets in a flyover, and it was a huge event, but did it really bring people close together?
What is the long term effect, the legacy of this event? It’s easy to go out there, wave flags, sing songs, but is that the only way we can mark these occasions?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“My fourth and final question, for the time being lads, and as a fellow potential podcaster I’m interested in what you have to say on this. I see you’ve been podcasting since around 2018 I think? So, looking right back to when you started, has there been any material recorded that you wished you used?
I see you had loads of guests when you first launched, and I presume you edited these to retain the best bits, but was there any unused material that you think you should have used, and will that be used in other material going forward?
Did you ever have a guest record with you, that ended up being something that couldn’t be used? As an aside, do you retain all your recordings in an archive, and edit archived material into other episodes?”
Stuart and William once again share their knowledge and expertise about podcasting as they discuss the above question which is another in the set of four sent in by listener Toby in Leicestershire, England.
They cover many topics during this fifteen-minute discussion including how they aren’t a stereotypical podcast, and when they do have guests, they rarely remove anything from the recording, but when they do, it's only as long as you don’t lose the essence, sometimes less is more. Essentially though they have to go with the decision of the guest, if the guest really wants something removed, it will be removed, and never see the light of day.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark World Thrift Day, in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
World Thrift Day is celebrated annually on 31st October worldwide, though in India the day is celebrated on 30th October.
The day was established with the intent of raising awareness among people all around the world about the idea of saving their money in a bank rather than keeping it under their mattress or at home.
This promotes savings and financial security for not only the individuals but for
nations as a whole.
This article in part explains the history of the day and its significance even now: https://bit.ly/3NbikU2
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Hi, me again, my third question for you, as a potential podcaster myself. So, do you ever film your podcast episodes? I see you make films that relate to your output and behind the scenes films, but do you see yourselves becoming a ‘visual’ podcast?
Stuart and William discuss another follow up question about podcasting from listener Toby in Leicestershire, England.
During this deliberation they talk about how this podcast is very much audio focused, and not a visual show, and that it's likely to stay that way, at least for the foreseeable future anyway. In a way, visuals don’t really interest them, as it can be a distraction to try and do too much during a recording session, and it is better to concentrate on quality, rather than quantity.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Hi chaps, it's me again, Toby. Listened to a number of your exceptional podcasts and want to pick your brains again. I see you guys have online Q&A’s with your audience and other podcasters. Great idea, by the way.
As a potential podcaster myself, I thought about joining one, but prefer to ask my questions within a podcast so more people can hear your views. My second question is, how do you deal with the privacy of people appearing on your podcast.
How do you allow people to have their voice heard if they don’t want to actually appear? Maybe though you’ve never had anyone who didn’t want to appear publicly, whatever the reason?”
Stuart and William share their knowledge about podcasting as they discuss the above question which is another sent in by listener Toby in Leicestershire, England.
Among other things they talk about dealing with privacy, about how they’ve had guests that want certain sections of the episode removed and how they’ve dealt with that, how they can blur someone’s image in a video, or change the sound of their voice if they request it.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“As someone whose looking at starting a podcast myself, can I ask, do you guys use consent forms for guests or anyone else appearing on your podcast? Have you ever had anyone dispute their contents if you use them, and has anyone refused to sign?”
Stuart and William discuss this question from Toby in Leicestershire, England, and during this chat, using their considerable podcasting experience, they share some insights into keeping a podcast running. For example they’ve evolved their consent forms for guests etc. that appear on the podcast.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Now the Low Traffic Neighbourhood Schemes (LTNs) are being rolled out even more across the city of Oxford, how do you guys feel its gone so far? How is this latest phase going, and being received, as the County Council attempts to reduce motor vehicles in local neighborhoods?
A future phase will see some of the arterial routes closed off, moving traffic onto the Ring Road, is this a good vision?"
Stuart and William discuss a very controversial subject, particularly locally in their hometown of Oxford, England, the topic of low traffic neighbourhoods. This discussion was instigated by the question above, sent in by listener Jon in Cowley, Oxford, England.
LTNs are forcing people to change their habits, meaning this is probably one of the first times the dominance of car travel has really been challenged. We've forgotten how fast the world has become, as we've locked ourselves away in our cars. Low traffic neighbourhoods are a very divisive thing for some people, but we have to change our habits in some way if we're going to tackle climate change. In a lot of people's minds, all LTNs have done is to attack the motorist, and just moving the traffic to the arterial routes. Isn't this just a process though, with those main routes becoming so busy that people realise they should stop driving so much, and to get out on foot, on bicycle, onto buses? Nudged Theory in action.
Both Stuart and William share their experiences of these newly formed LTN areas of the city, which lead Stuart to surmise that they have turned parts of Oxford into mini villages, and providing nicer areas for people to live in.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode they mention drone photographer Hedley Thorne, who is also a listener of this podcast, here's a link to his website: https://www.hedleythorne.com/ They also mention the Whitewicks who have been a previous guest on this show, here's a link to their YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/pwhitewick1
And if you want to know what an LTN is, here's a link: https://www.sustrans.org.uk/our-blog/get-active/2020/in-your-community/what-is-a-low-traffic-neighbourhood
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Stuart, you say you don’t travel. Are you missing out? Is your opinion less valid if you don’t travel, and have less experience of other cultures?”
Another great question from one of our listeners, this time coming from Ignacio in Peru.
Stuart and William discuss and investigate their own very different experiences of travel and life. Stuart states that he gets enough cultural exposure by the fact is lives in the city of Oxford, a very multi-cultural and accepting space. William on the other hand enjoys travelling, and seeing the world, and is something he needs to do to understand the world around him better.
In the end, the conclusion is that neither Stuart or William's experiences are a more valuable than the other, it's almost always the middle ground where the answers come from, and this conversation is no different.
During this episode they mention the Tommy's Outdoors podcast, here's a link to that podcast: https://tommysoutdoors.com/
This is a podcast where we aim to challenge your beliefs with its main overall themes being nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
We're heading towards 400 episodes and like your help to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In a bonus episode of the podcast, we find Stuart and William at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market, where they request your ideas for where they can promote this podcast. Do you know any markets where they can have a stall, or anywhere that they can come and talk about this podcast? You can email your ideas at thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Is some people’s reticence to sit in silence, and a preference for busyness, an indication they are fearful of being confronted by their own true self?”
Stuart and William chew over the above question, which was sent in by listener Austin in Bogota, Columbia.
This lead them ask some quite difficult questions. Are we at times scared of confronting ourselves, and is this one of the reasons why we avoid sitting in silence sometimes, keeping ourselves busy instead? Quiet moments can give us time to process what has happened in our life recently don't you think? Yet there are people who regiment their day to day lives, scheduling their whole day from start to finish, with no quiet time factored in, just busy, busy, busy. Doing one thing at a time, and being aware of our thoughts is surely a better way forward, and in itself a modern form of meditation?
Silence often leads to feelings of discomfort, explore that discomfort, and ask yourself when you bring busyness into you life, explore why you are doing that? What purpose does it serve?
In this episode William talks about the Icelandic band Sigur Rós, here is a link to their music if you've never heard them before https://spoti.fi/3ynHLeW
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Is maths something we humans constructed or is it something we discovered? Is looking at the reality perceived around us mathematically an accurate representation of how things work?”
Another broad ranging conversation between your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow as they discuss the above question from Steve in Bredbury, Stockport, Greater Manchester, England.
They go into a deep philosophical discussion around the huge subject of Maths. How it is something we discovered, a language to make sense of the world around us, and how we use it to try and capture the essence of the universe. Maths is based in natural law, it forms a part of all science.
This is a question that is almost unanswerable, and hard to find a definitive for, so as they bounce around, trying to explore the possibilities, Stuart and William at times possibly contradict themselves. This podcast is designed to open the door to the big questions, and this is certainly one of them.
During this podcast William mentions the James O'Brien's Mystery Hour podcast, you can listen to that show with the following link: https://spoti.fi/3CaL1vg
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Trigger Warning: The topic of male suicide is discussed in this episode. If this is a subject that you find difficult to listen to, then this might not be the episode for you right now.
We tell the story of Leon, who was a listener of this podcast, a friend of Stuart's (co-host of this podcast) exploring Leon as a person, and breaking down the barriers, and stereotypes around mental health, and a very set of very human challenges.
This episode offers you the listener, one of the most far reaching calls to action this podcast has ever made.
In a very different episode to normal, Stuart and William invited Leon's mother Dianne and his step father Cyril to come onto the podcast and talk about Leon. Recorded on the balcony of the home Dianne and Cyril share, they explore family grief, and talk about Leon's Law. They explore the emotions that came as the result of Leon's death including confusion, helplessness, anger, guilt, loss, despair, sadness, and longing.
Leon was a very kind, caring, intelligent, skilled and knowledgeable person in a non-conventional way who lived with a form of Schizophrenia, which, sadly, led to him to making a series of decisions that ended in him taking his own life. Leon's story reveals the weaknesses in the current mental health system here in the UK, together with the possibilities of the better support if mental health conditions were framed and supported in a different way.
This episode is not about blame, but a candid look at the harsh truths of the systems we rely on to work in daily life.
What do you make of this discussion? If you have any views you can email us at thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com
Here are some helpful links:
You can get in touch with Dianne at improvemh@outlook.com
You can buy Dianne's book 'A Bird of Paradise, Lost' which tells Leon's story here https://www.russellturner.org/paradise.asp
And here is a list of online resources that you may find helpful:
- A list of every British MP https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons
- Calm https://www.thecalmzone.net/
- David Kessler https://grief.com/
- Global Retreat Centre https://www.globalretreatcentre.org/
- The Oxford Mindfulness Foundation https://www.oxfordmindfulness.org/
- Mind https://www.mind.org.uk/
- Rethink https://www.rethink.org/
- Self-Compassion https://self-compassion.org/
- Survivors of Bereavement by Suicide https://uksobs.org/
- Zero Suicide Alliance https://www.zerosuicidealliance.com/
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Is anything truly a waste of time?”
Stuart and William commence with a short discussion this time, around the question above, sent in by Russ in Harcourt Hill, Oxford, England.
During their conversation they ask the question, is anything really a waste of time? Plus, they examine the theory that maybe life doesn't actually have a meaning, though that doesn't always make life meaningless, yet people are always seemingly striving to find meaning. They also expand into how the whole of idea of wasting time is largely all a matter of perspective.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Who sets the agenda in social justice issues?”
Stuart and William are not shy of tackling the big questions, and they don't come bigger than the type of question above, which was sent in by Heather in Ablington, Wiltshire, England.
This question sparked a discussion around having a lot of privilege, particularly if you're unaware of that privilege. They talk about how admitting you're wrong can be a hard step to take, but it is also often a healthy one, together how those in power, or the unfairly advantaged, can often set the agenda.
They also steer the conversation away from social justice at times and talk about the impact of people like Martin Lewis, and even discuss the big question, is this the start of societal collapse?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Here's your chance to meet the hosts of this podcast. Stuart and William will be headed to the Oxfordshire village of Harwell, where they will be giving a talk about wildlife in everyday gardens, for the Harwell Gardening Club, the talk begins at 7:30pm. It will be at St Matthews Church, OX11 0EZ. You can find out more with the following link: https://harwellvillage.uk/harwell-gardeners-club-2022/
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Heard your episode recently about the impact war has on wildlife. In Cambodia, years of war meant some parts of the jungle there were left undisturbed so nature flourished. Cambodia is one of the fastest growing economies in the world now, and man is plundering the jungles resources to fuel that growth. Some say nothing good can come from war, but it seems in this instance, in some ways nature was better off when man was distracted by war. What do you think?”
Stuart and William once again embark on an in depth discussion which was framed around the question above sent in by Ash in Icomb, Gloucestershire, England who is a listener of this podcast.
They discuss how habitats can look the way the do because of man's impact, how our impact can be so violent that even the stronger species often don't stand a chance, and that we don't need the distraction war to have less of an impact on some aspects of nature.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Here's your chance to meet the hosts of this podcast. Stuart and William will be headed to the Oxfordshire village of Harwell, where they will be giving a talk about wildlife in everyday gardens, for the Harwell Gardening Club, the talk begins at 7:30pm. It will be at St Matthews Church, OX11 0EZ. You can find out more with the following link: https://harwellvillage.uk/harwell-gardeners-club-2022/
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In February 2022, Stuart and William, co-hosts of the well-established The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, launched the new mini-series 'Indigenous Voices'. For this next instalment, they were joined by Chase Iron Eyes for an interesting conversation, when they revisited a listener question from Adriana in The Netherlands, which was originally discussed in this podcast episode Direct Action, Does It Work?
Chase Iron Eyes is an American Indian activist, attorney, politician, and a member of the Oglala Sioux Tribe. He is a member of the Lakota People's Law Project, and a co-founder of the Native American news website, Last Real Indians https://lastrealindians.com/.
Chase talks about the systems of law, economy, government, media, all being designed, and these systems are framed to protect capital and property. He explores with us how corporations can destroy a river, but seemingly not face the ramifications, together with telling us about the history of his people, how they've been labelled as barbarians and heathens. He talks of the defence of Mother Earth and how we have it within ourselves to avert this climate crisis.
To continue this new mini-series (Indigenous Voices), the question put to Chase was, "Does direct action get anyone, anywhere?" with a subtle extra question of whether Chase has any examples, from personal experience, of what doors have been opened, or closed due to direct action?
More episodes in the Indigenous Voices mini-series will be recorded in due course with Chase and others, often only available to watch/listen by our Indigenous Champion support tier backers, on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
You don't need to be an expert in the subject matter or in indigenous cultures to enjoy our new mini-series. Just a willingness to explore the unknown, the hard truths, the indigenous viewpoint, and see where it takes us. What can we learn from them and what can they learn from us? What can we learn from each other?
Join us then for this interesting, and often philosophical episode of the podcast. You'll likely need to watch/listen to this more than once, as there's so much in there, and much learning to be gleaned from Chase's wise words.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Who do you wish you’d never met?”
The above is very direct question, set by listener Brian in Longnor, Staffordshire, England, which provoked an interesting discussion between co-hosts Stuart and William.
They discuss how everyone you meet has some impact on your life in some way, they explore regret and how anybody can distance themselves from it. How if you know how it feels when something is working well, that that can be used a a good barometer for relationships.
Regrets only brings negativity into your life, and through experience they both come to the conclusion to not take things too personally, be able to let go, and just move on. Are bad relationships always a bad influence on our lives?
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
To contribute to the discussion hosts Stuart and William, mark International Day of Peace, in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
Each year the International Day of Peace is observed around the world on the 21st of September. The UN General Assembly has declared this as a day devoted to strengthening the ideals of peace, through observing 24 hours of non-violence and cease-fire.
You can find out more at the following website: https://bit.ly/3TNutSe
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Do you ever imagine you’ll be a daily podcast?”
In a very short episode of this podcast, Stuart and William discuss the above question, which was sent in by Alison in Driffield, Gloucestershire, England.
During this conversation they go into depth about the podcast, and how they currently see its future, in particular how we'd need more of a structure around us to expand it beyond twice a week, they also touch on how, if it were more than twice a week, it possibly wouldn't allow you as a listener time to absorb the discussions they have, and much more besides.
This is an episode that is very much about this very podcast, so if you're interested to hear more about it, and its origins, this is the episode for you.
The title? Well you'll just need to listen to this episode to find out.
During this episode its mentioned that Stuart and William are leading a guided walk. If you have enjoyed the podcast, you have to a chance to meet the co-hosts in person! They are leading an Alphabet Walk around Sandford Brake in Oxford. You can find out more about this event, and book your tickets at the following link: https://bit.ly/3KRAbOF
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Stuart, you say you dye your hair to prompt conversations about the climate crisis. Does the fact you are causing pollution doing that make you a hypocrite?”
Stuart and William undertake quite a philosophical meandering chat around the above question, from Robin in Furness Vale, Derbyshire, England (Sorry Robin, William called you Rob near the start of this episode).
As always, they expand and talk about the big issues, and during this episode they touch upon how we do a lot of non-essential things in our lives. How some people will only listen to an alternative point of view about sustainability if the person presenting the argument is living a completely clean life. The counter argument being that if these people aren't completely clean, we don't need to do anything until they are, as they are hypocrites.
They encourage you not to readily call others hypocrites, and that we're all capable of hypocrisy in daily life, as we are all locked into the same systems. They also ask you to think about what aspects of your life produce pollution, and how you can reduce that by doing what you are doing, slightly differently. It's not what we do it's how we do it.
During this episode William mentions a video where Stuart first revealed that he'd dyed his hair, here is a link to that video: The World Isn't The Only Thing That's On Fire
During this episode its also mentioned that Stuart and William are leading a guided walk. If you have enjoyed the podcast, you have to a chance to meet the co-hosts in person! They are leading an Alphabet Walk around Sandford Brake in Oxford. You can find out more about this event, and book your tickets at the following link: https://bit.ly/3KRAbOF
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What hinders you guys as people?”
Co-hosts, Stuart and William, discuss the above question, from Ash in Icomb, Gloucestershire, England.
During this instalment, of this well established podcast, they talk about what hinders and impedes them personally, how we can easily curb ourselves by our own stubbornness, the hinderance of your childhood, and ask the question, do we too willingly blame someone else for being culpable for the events in life that hinder us as individuals?
These conversations often meander, that's just the nature of good, healthy conversation. They do however often end up coming back to this podcast's overall themes which are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Which of those 6 topics are featured? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
If you have enjoyed the podcast, you have to a chance to meet the co-hosts in person! Stuart and William are leading an Alphabet Walk around Sandford Brake in Oxford. You can find out more about this event, and book your tickets at the following link: https://bit.ly/3KRAbOF
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“It's been asked before, and you’ve spoken around this I know, but can I ask again, what's the future of this podcast?”
In this very short episode, Stuart and William reflect on how they see the future of this podcast. They talk about the various new mini series, for example Beyond Stereotypes and Indigenous Voices that have been launched, how they want another live show this year, and the fact that as of the date of release of this particular episode, they've 54 questions from you the listeners to get through, and discuss.
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Are truly inspirational people, who tangibly effect change and progress in others, those that talk, grab headlines and chase buzz words and phrases? Or are they those who show the way, and broaden inclusivity and opportunities etc by showing what and how it can be done by their actions, and through their own lived lives? To me inspirational words resonate far far far less than inspirational actions do, and can often have a longer shelf life and be more relatable.
Also, do you think inspirational people distract themselves from growing as people, by getting too bogged down in rhetoric (internal as well as external, public as well as private), and not focusing enough on their actions, and not living the life they want for themselves, and others?
Most of us learn better by watching, instead of listening, well that's what it seems to me, so should that be factored in more to help mitigate the societal challenges we're facing?”
Stuart and William embark on an in-depth conversation which was prompted by the above question, sent in by listener Jason in Dove Holes, Derbyshire, England.
They discuss how you can be the person you want to be by living your life, and showing through your actions who you are. We're often in the mindset that we have to announce everything publicly, but often it's not what someone says, it's what they do that matters more. Buzzwords and phrases move on, and lose their impact over time, so you inspire people longer term by doing what you do and talking less. They conclude by asking the question, how can we be more inspirational as individuals?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What positives can be drawn from apathetic individuals, and what roles do morals and ethics play in leadership, that may inspire them in the various aspects of life?”
Stuart and William, co-hosts of this podcast, once again delve into a question sent in by a listener of the show, which this time comes from Ken in Leek, Staffordshire, England.
They discuss whether apathy really is a dreadful thing, how apathy could lead to a more stabilised life, and is there a willingness in politics to even engage with apathetic?
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this short bonus episode, Stuart and William talk about a nature and photography focused workshop they will be running later this month, on the 25th, at Sandford Brake Woods and Fields in Oxford.
You can book tickets to this event with the following link: https://bit.ly/3poQ5X7
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Is life really that interesting, magical, miraculous and something to be savoured/respected. Which is something we often try to tell ourselves and others. Or is it all a smoke screen to help us deal with the randomness, futility and meaninglessness of life? Have either of you got, or had a fear of death?”
This is the podcast where we have the conversations that need having, without scripts, and from a place of authenticity. This episode is no exception, as it sees Stuart and William once again embarking on a discussion which was prompted by the above question, sent by listener Russ in Harcourt Hill, Oxford, England.
They discuss how life can be interesting, magical, miraculous and something to be savoured/respected, but they explore the harsh truth that sometimes life isn't always like this, and we should allow people to experience their lives as they see it.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Do you think there's a north south divide in the UK within environmental activism?”
This is a podcast of real opinions, real discussions, authentic views, but no scripts. During this episode co-hosts Stuart and William embark on a discussion which was sparked by the above question, that was sent in by listener Bob in Stone, Staffordshire, England.
They discuss whether there truly is a north/south divide within environmental/climate activism, how most campaigns are generally localised in some way, and where exactly is this alleged north/south divide these days anyway?
Are you an activist, have you found a north/south divide exists? We'd like to hear from you.
Are there connections between the different groups of activists across the country? Again we'd like to hear from you, and about your experiences.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/messageThis podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“I’m back, with another question guys. Have been wondering where Pedro is, and when he’s going to set another of his listener questions? Wonder if he laughs as much as I do, when you poke fun at him on this podcast? All in good jest though, I realise that. I’ve been in hospital for a few months, and see I’ve got a lot of listening to catch up with regarding your podcast. Well done on producing more than 300 episodes.
So, what are your favourite countries you’ve visited, and can you ever justify polluting travel, in the pursuit of knowledge expansion that comes about because of travel?”
Stuart and William embark on a discussion which was sparked by the above question sent in by listener Adwin in South Africa. They ask the important question, why do we travel? Is it for history? Is it to take in the local culture? Is it mindless travel, going to the same places, and not really learning anything, acting like braindead sheep?
They question why would you go to a resort which is far removed from the local culture? We can justify everything, whether it's right is another matter, and they cover that uncomfortable truth too.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Stuart, you say you never vote politically, is this wise?”
Even though the question above which has been sent in by listener Iris in Wetley Rocks, Staffordshire, England, is very much aimed towards Stuart, it opens out into a wider conversation about voting, and politics in general.
The discussion rather than debate, covers political apathy, the wisdom of voting or not voting politically, how politicians think too much about their own careers, and is it feasible that voting is maybe the illusion of power?
Both Stuart and William talk very much from their own experiences, talking about being beyond apathetic when it comes to voting, and how the alternative isn't really an alternative, potentially.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“I’ve only ever asked one question on this podcast before, and that was back in early 2021, I think? Back then I set a question about fake news, but this time I have something different for you. People say engineers hold a lot of answers to the climate issues we face, I like to ask though, what are your favourite engineering achievements in human history and why?”
Stuart and William attempt to answer the above question, from listener Ben from Islip, Oxfordshire, and end up branching out into a much wider and broader conversation. Not really a debate, more an off the cuff and genuine exploration.
They both share what their favourite engineering achievements are, and why. William goes for something out of this world, why Stuart opts for something much, much closer to home. Any guesses what that might be before you listen? No prizes for the correct answer, it's just an insight into how well you know you hosts.
During this episode William mentions the book by Brian W. Aldiss 'The Dark Light Years' which he thinks is well worth checking out.
How would you answer this question from listener Ben? What's your favourite engineering achievements in human history and why?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What do you do with leftover food?”
Stuart and William once again embark on an in-depth unplanned conversation, that came from listener Karlijn in Teignmouth, Devon, England.
They discuss at length their thoughts around food waste, encouraging you to enjoy the food you make, but not to cook too much, or to not buy too much food. They talk about what to do with any leftover food and any surplus food that you have produced, including how you can give leftover food to a local food bank, or food larder, or give it someone you know.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark Left Handers Day, in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
August 13th is a chance to tell your family and friends how proud you are of being left-handed, and also raise awareness of the everyday issues that lefties face as we live in a world designed for right-handers.
Wish everyone a very happy Left Handers Day by using the hashtag #lefthandersday
Here's a link to find out more about this day: lefthandersday.com
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William once again had a stall at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market, and while there recorded a short bonus episode, where they talk about a new collaboration William is embarking on with Tommy, from the Tommy's Outdoors podcast, and they also talked about the workshop they will be leading in September, at Sandford Brake, in Oxford. You can book tickets to this event with the following link: https://bit.ly/3poQ5X7
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What’s the best form of recycling?”
This question from listener Helle in Lincoln, Lincolnshire in England, sparked an in-depth exchange between Stuart and William, around the whole idea of what recycling is?
They mention the 5 Rs, which are refuse, reduce, reuse, repurpose, and then recycle and look at how man and nature can live side by side.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
It's podcast with a mission to get people with polarised views talking to each other, and to find common ground to build from.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“How do we inspire all sections of the White community, to own their whole history, and pursue equality?”
This is a big subject, do you concur?
Stuart and William delve into the above question sent in by listener Samia, from Tlemcen in Algeria, Africa.
They discuss how we have no control over what's happened in the past, only control over what happens in the present, how we're not taught our full history, and how we may still need some examples of inequality now and then to show and remind us that we don't want to live like that, which in turn can inspire increased equality.
They discuss big questions like what exactly is the white community? Is the pursuit of complete equality actually even possible?
During this episode William mentions a video by the YouTube channel Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell The Last Human – A Glimpse Into The Far Future, here is a link to that video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEENEFaVUzU
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. It's often an unscripted and off the cuff discussion rather than a debate, and this episode is no exception.
What do you make of this question below that was sent in by listener Ramona from Paraguay.
“When did you learn the world is unjust and unfair?”
Inspired by this question, Stuart and William embark on a discussion around the whole idea of what's unjust and unfair, how unjustness and unfairness can often either be hidden, or sometimes you're made blatantly aware of it.
How can we react better to unjustness and unfairness? Have a listen to this episode and see if you agree with the conclusions that Stuart and William come up with. Or maybe you'll have your own views after listening in.
What did you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Jean-Jacques Rousseau had the theory man is naturally good though corrupted by society. Others agree with Aristotle’s and John Locke’s theory, we are born an empty slate, free to define our own character, with outside forces shaping us.
However, the Bible seems to say, the natural human condition is sinful and estranged from God. We are not born innately good or morally neutral. We are born sinners, and every person’s destiny is death and wrath because of it. Please share your views”.
Stuart and William once again tap into at least two of the main themes of this podcast, those being philosophy, and the human condition, as they discuss the above question from Paco in Wimbledon, London, England.
During this episode they talk about whether man is good, bad, or just indifferent, and how genetics can be a powerful factor in what we become. They talk about reincarnation, spirituality, and raise the profound idea that we could all be the same being, and maybe we should realise that we all exist symbiotically.
What do you make of this discussion? Out of the six main themes of this podcast, which are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.. Which were covered the most?
Also do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark World Nature Conservation Day, in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
World Nature Conservation Day acknowledges that a healthy environment is the foundation for stable and healthy societies.
Earth’s natural resources include air, minerals, plants, soil, water, and wildlife. Conservation is the care and protection of these resources, so that they can be preserved for future generations. It includes maintaining diversity of species, genes, and ecosystems, as well as functions of the environment, such as nutrient cycling.
You can find out more at the following website: https://bit.ly/3PCvZDV
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Stuart, you mention in passing, during a number of the more interesting episodes, that you don’t go out much these days. Why is that, and how do you square that with having a job connecting people with nature?”
Stuart and William, two relatable men, explore regularly the big issues, and they often do not know where these conversations will lead, like today's episode which was sparked by the above question sent by listener Adriana, from Utrecht in the Netherlands.
The question that Adriana has set is very much a personal question, aimed towards Stuart, about how he squares not getting out much, with helping people connect with nature. Stuart talks about how in recent years he has become a lot more reclusive, and how this was happening even before the lockdowns. He talks about his physical and mental health as well, and how they effect him. William offers his own insights too.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What bridges are you happy you burned?”
Are you worried about the big issues we all face? Then this is the podcast for you! Generally this podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Which theme do you think this episode fits? Maybe its more than one of them? It normally is.
Stuart and William embark on a short discussion around the above question, sent in by listener Ramona, in Paraguay.
They discuss the difference between burning bridges, and the act of moving on, and particularly moving on quickly. The act of moving on from a person or situation can be healthy, with the act of leaving silence in your place being very powerful in certain situations.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Have you ever experienced social pressure?”
Generally this podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. This time Stuart and William again embark on a deep philosophical discussion around what social pressure is, how even when we see ourselves as outside of society, we're still conforming. Even when we're rebelling, we're still in a way conforming to the pressure's society places on us about what it is to be a rebel charactor.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“How important are friends and family?”
You might notice that this is a slightly different style episode, this is because we recently had Evan Burke, an Oxford University student micro-intern working alongside us for a week, who edited this particular episode, hence the differing editing style to the norm. What do you think?
In a very to the point episode, Stuart and William speak honestly, frankly and plainly about their own experience of friends and family, and particularly that family can often be an excuse for taking people for granted. They take the question on to a new level, reframing these connections as being a support network, and moving away from the labels of Friends and Family. You support them, and they support you.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Generally this podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“If you could live your lives again, would you?”
In a nice short episode, Stuart and William discuss the above question which was set my Samia in Tlemcen, Algeria, plus a range of other things.
They both have very definite views about the subject of whether or not they would want to live their lives again. Would you do anything differently if you could live your life again?
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Generally this podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Could you explore sustainability and greening of sport?”
During this interesting and in-depth discussion, amongst the subjects covered are, how we need to repurpose and reuse sports clothing, and how we need to be aware not only of the direct, but also the indirect pollution that's created by sport. It was felt this is an important discussion as so many of us enjoy sports, but many of us also want to make it more sustainable. Some interesting solutions are offered, as well as actions to help you make better decisions in the future.
In this episode, Stuart and William once again delve into another question sent in by a listener, this time it's Karlijn from Teignmouth, Devon, England.
During the episode Stuart mentions LimeLight sports and ReRun Clothing, here are links to both to find out more: https://www.limelightsports.com/ and https://rerunclothing.org/
They also mention the recent episode Fast Fashion Issues, which themes link nicely to today's topic, here is a link to that episode: Fast Fashion Issues
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Generally this podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Why have many societies begun to place such a high value on emotions and being emotional?”
Generally this podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
In today's episode Stuart and William discuss and delve into the above question, sent in by a long-time listener and contributor, Roman from Slovakia.
They really dig into what emotions are, the power of having more open conversations about emotions, and how that can help your mental wellbeing. Stuart and William raise how there is not only more understanding of emotions at this time, but also that people are going beyond just talking about them now as well.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What are the problems and potential within the fashion industry? Slow fashion, as opposed to fast fashion, is that a real option?".
The main discussion in today's episode centres around the fast fashion industry, and what damage does fast fashion do to the environment, together with the amount of waste that's created by fast fashion. Including a quite startling stat around the amount of fashion that is produced but isn't actually sold.
Are we forgetting what's important to people, and the planet? Should we instead be more open to buying less, or purchasing more second-hand clothes, and following the 5 R's of refuse, reduce, reuse, repurpose, and then recycle?
In today's episode Stuart and William discuss in their relaxed style the above question, set by listener Elaine in Telford, Shropshire, England.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Which trees are the best wood to turn into charcoal? Is it beneficial to dig charcoal into the ground?"
A curious group of people, exploring a curious subject with real curiosity.
This is a slightly different episode to the norm, a bonus Friday release for you to get your thinking caps on with.
This bonus recording came about from when Stuart and William recently held a stall at the East Oxford Farmers' & Community market where the above question was set by a Julian Coates (Jules). It was felt to be such an interesting question, and that Jules had a lot to say on the subject, that he was invited as a guest, to further explore the topic he raised.
No-one on the recording, Jules included, were experts about the subject of charcoal, and its potential benefits to the soil, and a means to lock away the carbon we produce,. This didn't stop William, Stuart and Jules delving into this subject though, with some interesting insights, ideas and humour.
They talk about soil deficiency, how trees absorb a lot of from the air, including carbon. They then branch off into the subject of how your garden doesn't always need to be tidy.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Is poverty in society inevitable?”
Welcome once again to another off the cuff conversation between your hosts Stuart and William as they discuss the above question, from listener Vera, in New Hinksey, Oxford, England.
In this episode they encourage you to expand the understanding of the word poverty, and whether poverty is truly inevitable in all societies.
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Should we let nature lead the way as we try and re-wild areas?”
In this episode, Stuart and William discuss in their chatty unscripted style the above question, which was sent in by listener Gary in Stevenage, Hertfordshire, England.
The discussion sparked centres around the economics and the value of nature. How much we set ourselves apart from nature, when we're very much part of it. Also, the need to work together within communities, to help re-wild areas, and not just to leave nature to it.
In this episode William mentions a previous episode with guest Andy Gunn from BBOWT, here's a link to that episode: TPC: Nature reserves, hippies, disposability, and more with Andy Gunn of BBOWT
Also, in the episode William mentions the Woodberry Wetlands in North London, here's a link for more information for anyone interested in going: https://www.wildlondon.org.uk/woodberry-wetlands-nature-reserve
What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com, or record us a message in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside
This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.
Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view , support our work through Patreon https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside or 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“If you could start a country from scratch, what would it be like?”
Stuart and William once more embark on a naturally unscripted and unplanned style of conversation, for a nice long episode of this podcast. Neither of them are experts, they will however explore this question, in a relatable way, for you, the listener.
Help us to spread the podcast as far and as wide as possible by sharing it with five of your friends today by sharing the following link https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Education in schools, and shared learning about environmental changes we all face, we know is important, but how do we avoid it being boring, keeping it relevant in a contextual way? Children are asking to be taught about it, yet, we’re still failing them".
A longer episode than we've been releasing recently, so we suggest you find a good mug of tea, and a nice comfortable place to sit and listen, as Stuart and William embark on another unscripted, searching, insightful laypersons chat, as they discuss a question from Vera, in New Hinksey, Oxford, England.
Help us to spread the podcast as far and as wide as possible by sharing it with five of your friends today by sharing the following link https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Is a sense of humor, a byproduct of consciousness, or something else entirely?”
A nice fun question this one, from listener Gary, in Stevenage, Hertfordshire, England, which Stuart and William conversate around, and reflect on what humour is, and where it comes from. Any idea's?
Help us to spread the podcast as far and as wide as possible by sharing it with five of your friends today by sharing the following link https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Do you think climate and sustainability could be added to the school curriculum?”
In this episode Stuart and William mull over the question above, which was sent in by listener Kim in Merthyr Tydfil, Wales.
Help us to spread the podcast as far and as wide as possible by sharing it with five of your friends today by sharing the following link https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to the first full episode of the Beyond Stereotypes mini-series.
This series aims to breakdown the stereotypes and labels we put on ourselves and others, and that often surround activists and protestors. It's harder to dismiss, disparage, talk over and disrespect people if we get to know them as real human beings. It's a great first step toward someone with a differing view, and finding a common ground to build from.
In this first episode of the series we talk Flo and Adrian, two activists who are part of a protest against a new housing development that is planned to be built on the fields between Bicester and Bucknell in Oxfordshire, England. The new village of Hawkwell will effectively join the hamlet Bucknell to the growing town of Bicester.
Another aim of this series, is to offer support and best practice idea's for protesters, activists or even disconnected concerned citizens, the world over.
Help us to spread the podcast as far and as wide as possible by sharing it with five of your friends today by sharing the following link https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What is the best path to find truth; science, maths, art, philosophy, or something else?”
Stuart and William delve into, this question above, which was sent in by listener Ella from Heaton Mersey, Stockport, Greater Manchester, England.
Help us to spread the podcast as far and as wide as possible by sharing it with five of your friends today by sharing the following link https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
[Audio from an unavailable promo film]
Prompted by listeners, including Vandana from India, asking what was happening with the new Beyond Stereotypes mini-series, in this short trailer, Stuart and William give an update on where we currently are, and where we're headed.
In fact, this week sees the launch of this new mini-series, with a full episode publicly released on Wednesday 8th June, and 2 extra recorded items for our Beyond Stereotypes backers on our Patreon funding page, being released on Thursday 9th June.
Help us to spread the podcast as far and as wide as possible by sharing it with five of your friends today by sharing the following link https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark World Environment Day, in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
Earth faces a triple planetary emergency:
The first: The climate is heating up too quickly for people, and nature, to adapt;
The second: Habitat loss and other pressures mean an estimated 1 million species are threatened, with extinction;
The Third: Pollution continues to poison our air, land and water.
The way out of this dilemma, is to transform our economies and societies, to make them inclusive, fair and more connected with nature. We must shift from harming the planet to healing it.
The good news, is a lot of the solutions and the technology already exist, and are increasingly affordable.
OnlyOneEarth is the campaign for World Environment Day 2022. It calls for collective, transformative action, on a global scale, to celebrate, protect and restore our planet.
You can find out more about World Environment Day by following this link; https://bit.ly/3a7ihZQ
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“I’ve heard Colombia is focusing on megadiversity to lead to meaningful change, have you heard about it?”
Stuart and William conversate around this question above, which was sent in by listener Jonny from Barrow In Furness, Cumbria, England. Sorry Jonny, in the recording we said you were in Lancashire, but now realise you are in Cumbria. Our apologies, hope that error doesn't put you off?
Help us to spread the podcast as far and as wide as possible by sharing it with five of your friends today by sharing the following link https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Amazing things happen when people come together, and collaborate, don’t you think?”
Stuart and William embark on a good long discussion, exploring their off the cuff thoughts around the question above, which was set by Matthew in Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, England.
During this episode Stuart and William refer to the episode 'Community Resilience' as the themes intertwine, here's a link to that: https://bit.ly/3z8hPFs
Also during this episode Stuart mentions Back From The Brink, here's a link to their website to find out more information about this project: https://naturebftb.co.uk/
Help us to spread the podcast as far and as wide as possible by sharing it with five of your friends today by sharing the following link https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“The impacts of colonialism, and the former slave trade, still exist in my view. Racism is deeply engrained in UK culture, which in part is a result of formerly having an empire. Much of this racism is subtle, and not acknowledged too often in my view.
Why isn’t the UK school curriculum containing the full picture of UK history, and the negatives and positives of us having had an empire, and up to our necks in colonialism and the slave trade history? What are we trying to hide, or maybe you feel we’re not hiding anything?
Many English people have little knowledge of our history, and how other cultures perceive us in the modern day as a consequence of that. Is our seeming lack of wanting to talk about our involvement in historic outrages, rooted in us thinking if we acknowledge our history it will mean we’ll be saying we are still colonialists?
Just because our ancestors were, in my view doesn't mean we are just because we acknowledge that, but not talking about it perpetuates in my view the bad stuff of the past. Colonialism seems to still exist (but in another form) with the dominant world powers still currently extracting earth minerals from all over the world, yet when the populations in those areas are displaced or become economic migrants, they are not supported?
I see in some poor countries, some locals have the job of extracting minerals, but are paid very little, with the value increasing obscenely once it gets to the dominant powers above.
For example I think its the diamond industry in Sierra Leone, the value does not filter down to the local people doing the work, so local interests still aren’t protected even if they do the extraction themselves. This is all a mess. Good luck guys discussing this lot”
Stuart and William do their best to explore the above question that was sent in by listener Todd in Oxford, England.
Help us to spread the podcast as far and as wide as possible by sharing it with five of your friends today by sharing the following link https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Is it better to be a big fish in a small pond or a small fish in a big pond?”
Stuart and William once again delve into and explore the above question, in this short episode, which was sent in by listener Ella in Heaton Mersey, Stockport, Greater Manchester, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark International Day for Biological Diversity in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
As the global community is called to re-examine our relationship to the natural world, one thing is certain: despite all our technological advances, we are completely dependent on healthy and vibrant ecosystems for our water, food, medicines, clothes, fuel, shelter and energy, just to name a few.
The theme in 2022 is “Building a shared future for all life”. Fitting within the context of the ongoing United Nations Decade on Restoration, which highlights that biodiversity is the answer to several sustainable development challenges, the slogan conveys the message that, biodiversity is the foundation upon which we can build back better.
You can find out more by following this link; https://www.un.org/en/observances/biological-diversity-day
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“How do we increase participation, and resilience, in community food activities? Moving away from emergency responses, to a more long-term view of our societal needs”.
Stuart and William embark on good long discussion, a brainstorming session perhaps? Exploring their off the cuff thoughts around the question above, which was set by Helle, in Lincoln, Lincolnshire, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What benefits does art provide society? Does art hurt society in any way?”
A good philosophical question this, from listener Matthew in Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, England, which Stuart and William conversate around, as they reflect on exactly what is art.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William once again record in Stuart's back garden, hence the background sounds, with Stuart in your left ear, and William in your right ear, placing you, the listener, at the heart of the conversation.
In this episode they conversate, explore, and delve into the question below, which was sent in by our listener Todd in Oxford, England.
“Recently, when members of the UK royal family visited some Caribbean islands, they were met with protests about the former slave trade and colonial impacts during history, and today. These protests clearly got Prince William thinking, as he said when he became king, he wouldn’t rule the Commonwealth if the people of those countries weren’t in favour of that.
Isn’t it a bit odd how a country like Jamaica can be independent, and still have a UK royal as head of state? Isn’t it a bit odd the monarch is still head of state in the UK too?
Is Prince William's reaction to the protests a genuine attempt at changing things, and moving things, and the conversation on, and dealing with the modern day impacts of the former slave trade? Or is it a cynical attempt at convincing people the royal family are listening, and just trying to save their own status?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Is greenwashing better than no greenwashing at all?”
Stuart and William embark on a relatable conversation, where they aim to break down the big issues, and explore the unknown, and being honest when they don't know something. In this episode they discuss, chew over, and examine the above question, which was set by listener Ella in Heaton Mersey, Stockport, Greater Manchester, England.
During this episode William mentions the Climate Town YouTube channel, here's a link to the relevant video that talks about how banks in the US invest in the fossil fuel industry, yet claim they're green and good for the environment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJ7W6HFHPYs
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"What are the impacts on wildlife from war?"
Stuart and William had never even considered before, so settled down to record face to face again, in Stuart's back courtyard garden. Join them as they examine, explore, and delve into the above question, sent in by listener Melikah in Ghana.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
”In the UK, we’re totally obsessed with home and property ownership, we’ll, that's my personal perspective.
If someone buys a house next to a river, or on the coast, and experiences increasing levels of floods or erosion of that coast, devaluing or even threatening the existence of their property. Is it ever fair to blame others for their situation, or even expect the system to support them, by implementing flood and erosion mitigation measures, or even support them financially, so their investment value is sustained?
Is this really a reflection though that many of the systems of the ‘civilized’ world are unsustainable, and an example of how the nomadic cultures are more adaptable to the ever changing natural world?
It feels like the civilized world is literally behaving like King Canute, trying to hold back the tide, but I realise the nomadic cultures have their own issues too."
Stuart and William delve into, investigate, explore and conversate around this question above, which was sent in by listener Ivan in Grindleford, Derbyshire, England.
During this episode a stand-up routine by the comedian Bill Bailey is mentioned, here's a link to that piece: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECvwnV62pdc
Get email notifications about future releases: http://bit.ly/34oQXkm
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Can communities succeed against climate change, whether its man made or not?”
Stuart and William once again commence with on a long meandering conversation, where they examine, mull over, and digest the above question from listener Carol from Hayle in Cornwall, England.
During this installment, Stuart mentioned a cargo bike scheme in Manchester, England. Here are a couple of links about this:
https://www.manchester.gov.uk/news/article/8931/ebikes_come_to_manchester_as_ambitious_city-wide_scheme_launches
https://www.manchesterbikes.co.uk/service/cargo-bike-library/
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Is it reasonable for museums to hold items and collections from around the world when they were potentially obtained in dubious ways? Should they be given back to the cultures who already had them, or are they better used as educational opportunities for the museum visitors?”
Stuart 'the rebel rouser' who is NOT the podcast, and William 'the waffler' embark on a rambling, and entertaining exchange, which was sparked by another question from listener Todd in Oxford, England.
During this episode, William mentioned a stand up routine by the comedian James Acaster, here's a link to that video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x73PkUvArJY.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“If you could become immortal on the condition you would NEVER be able to die or kill yourself, would you choose immortality?”
Stuart and William once again embark on another deliberation, which includes a decent amount of humour, as they delve into, and investigate a question from listener Freddie in Amersham, Buckinghamshire, England.
During this instalment William mentioned that he met up with listeners Anna Dillon, and Hedley Thorne. Go check out Anna's artwork at http://www.annadillon.com/, and Hedley's drone photography can be found at https://www.hedleythorne.com/.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark World Earth Day in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
Earth Day is an annual event on April 22 to demonstrate support for environmental protection. First held on April 22, 1970, it now includes a wide range of events.
You can find out more by following this link; https://www.earthday.org/
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What are your views on statues of colonialists, and other figures from our collective pasts?”
In this iteration of the podcast, Stuart and William delve into, discuss, and philosophise around a question from listener Todd in Oxford, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William record face to face again as they discuss, investigate, and explore the below question from listener Eddie in Dover, Kent, England.
“How do we protect the planet?”
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William were once again out and about with a promotional stall for this podcast, this time at the Wolvercote Young People’s Club Easter Fair, which happened on the 10th April. Making new connections, building on current ones and resurrecting some relationships that had gone off the boil somewhat.
They recorded this piece during the set up for the fair, and talked about how you can have them at your event promoting our work, and how you can get in touch with them.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What does it mean to live a good life?”
Stuart and William embark on quite a deep philosophical discussion, that was sparked by what was, on the surface of it, quite a simple question, which was sent in by listener Don in Weymouth, Dorset, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Is the aviation industry truly doing as much as it can to change and make itself more sustainable?”
Stuart and William were once again able to record face to face, with Stuart in your left ear, and William in your right, as they want you to feel included and a central part of this conversation.
Right off the bat there is a lot of silliness and humour. In this edition of the podcast as they delve into, discuss, and philosophise around a question from listener Freda, Harwell, Oxfordshire.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“We need nature and nature needs us, please cover this in an episode”.
Stuart and William commence with quite an in depth, and times philosophical discussion, around the theme of the above question, sent in by listener Nikolai in Redcar, North Yorkshire, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Crop spraying. A necessity in modern times vs an unnatural method of growing the nation's food?”
A good, in depth exchange, between your hosts Stuart and William, which was sparked by the above question from Hedley in Didcot, Oxfordshire, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William were once again at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market with a stall last weekend, and while there they recorded some out and about material.
In this short bonus/trailer item they both discuss what else they do, outside of the podcast.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William were once again at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market with a stall last Saturday, whilst there they recorded some out and about material.
In this short bonus/trailer piece, they discuss an observation of a passerby at the market, who asked if they do a podcast, because their every conversation they have sounds like a podcast? This lead to a conversation about authenticity, about being genuine, and to thank you for listening.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside bonus
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William, at the weekend, were once again at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market, with a stall, while there they recorded some out and about material.
In this short trailer, they talk about the release schedule of the podcast, and when you can expect new episodes to be released.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“What harsh truths do you prefer to ignore?”
Join Stuart and William for another roaming, insightful, and unscripted deliberation which was sparked by a question from Laura in Dublin, Ireland.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“How can we all make a positive contribution to averting climate change?”
Stuart and William once again delve into and explore the above question, which was sent in by listener Don, in Weymouth, Dorset, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In today's bonus episode, we once again begin with an out and about recording at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market. While there Stuart and William asked members of the public to record a question for them to conversate around in a future episode of the podcast.
The question posed in this episode was set by Larry Sanders from East Oxford.
Larry's question is as follows:
"A lot of the discussion about the environment kind of leaves out health and social care. It doesn't mean they're against improving it, but I (Larry) wonder if it's possible to develop a society that does the right thing by the environment, which means heavy government intervention, then a lot of expenditure across the board.
Can you do that if you haven't created a society in which people feel that their basic needs like health care and social care have been met?"
This in-depth question once again moved Stuart and William into an insightful discussion around many different subjects, they never know where these conversations will end up when they press record.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Direct question guys. What makes you happy?”
A nice direct question this one, from listener Olivia in Newcastle Upon Tyne, Northern England, which Stuart and William conversate around, and reflect on what they think happiness is, and how we can all often see it as something we should pursue.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Have you guys discovered new things after Covid, about life, or performing to a live audience?”
Stuart and William delve into, investigate, explore and conversate around this question above, which was sent in by listener Laura in Dublin, Ireland.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In today's bonus episode, we begin with an out and about recording at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market. While there Stuart and William asked members of the public to record a question for them to conversate around in a future episode of the podcast.
The question posed in this episode was set by Elise Benjamin, who is a former Mayor of Oxford.
Elise's question is as follows:
"How can we convince people that the climate emergency is real, when some don't believe there's even a pandemic?"
This question started an in depth conversation between Stuart and William about what conspiracy theories are, about the pandemic and our individual experiences of it, and what is and isn't fake news.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William share their experiences and insights gained from creating this podcast, which was sparked by the following question from listener Freddie, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, England.
“I’m (Freddie) thinking of setting up my own podcast. What should my podcast be about?”
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“How can we specifically help pollinators in our communities?”
It's a short episode today, and Stuart and William once again embark on a meandering conversational style exchange, where they explore, discuss and chew over a question from a listener, which this time came from Ivan in Grindleford, Derbyshire, England.
During this episode they mention Pollinator Art, here is a link to their useful tool which helps you create a garden for pollinators. You can also fly through your virtual creation and see it through the eyes of the pollinator.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In today's bonus episode, we begin with an out and about recording at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market. Stuart and William asked members of the public to record a question for them to conversate around in a future episode of the podcast.
The question posed in this episode was set by Craig Simmonds, who is a former councilor at Oxford City Council, and Oxford County Council, a Freeman of the City of Oxford, and an Honorary Alderman.
Craig's question is as follows:
"We all know that electrification of vehicles is a good thing, for private cars, for bicycles, and scooters, and things like that. But is it 'the' solution? Is electrification the solution for large, heavy vehicles, and aviation too?"
This question sparked another spontaneous, improvised, insightful, unscripted and unprepared chat, between hosts Stuart and William.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“I know every man and his dog now has a podcast, but having been inspired by you guys, I’m thinking of doing my own mini-series. Any advice?”
A very different question, from long time listener Vandana in India. Stuart and William discuss and chew over this question, using the three years experience they've obtained through creating this very podcast.
During this episode the podcasting group MIC's Podcast Club is mentioned, here's a link to that group https://micmedia.co.uk/micspodcastclub/
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“At a local scale how can we benefit the environment via our own gardens?”
Stuart and William embark on a short discussion, which was prompted by a question from listener Freddie in Amersham, Buckinghamshire, England.
They talk about why you should cultivate your own food, which can open your mind up to the processes in the entire food system and building communities by talking to your neighbours about gardening.
You can send Stuart and William a question to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate. Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“I saw a football match on TV the other day, when Arsenal were wearing a white kit with no clear numbers. It was to mark their campaign ‘No More Red’ or something like that.
As a London club they are helping with the campaign to stop knife crime and deaths in the city. 'No More Red', relates to their kit normally being mainly red and the blood spilt during knife attacks, which is why Arsenal players were wearing white.
The kit will be given to charities to raise money for safe places and support to help provide an alternative to the gang culture that often leads to knife crime.
They know gangs will always be there, and not trying to remove it, just provide an alternative. Is that a mindset that could be used in the climate and ecological challenges we face?".
In this short episode Stuart and William discuss, mull over, and examine a question from Ella in Heaton Mersey, Stockport, Greater Manchester, England. Ella's thinking and point of view brings a new twist to the subject don't you think?
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Are the changes we’re seeing in the climate going to make it harder to predict the weather?”
Stuart and William once again embark on another humour filled discussion, where they investigate, delve into, and mull over a question from Olivia in Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“We, the public, often hold onto belief systems to reaffirm our personal biases, and social media algorithms naturally work so you see more of what you appear interested in.
This, along with our biases, form a comforting echo chamber, as we keep hearing the same stuff, or more of what we blindly want to hear. This leads to us not being challenged, even if we’re right or wrong.
Also, I see the UK government isn’t using the usual systems within mainstream media to get their message out, rather they are distributing their own information, using other free to use platforms. This also means the government isn’t being challenged as it once was.
Can I ask, how important is it do you think, that we’re all challenged, whether we’re right or wrong?”
Authentic views, in another meandering conversation, from hosts Stuart and William, who examine a listener question, from Pedro in Lisbon, Portugal.
During this episode we mention the YouTube channel Biffa Plays Indie Games, who likes to take a sip of tea during their videos, here's a link to the channel https://www.youtube.com/c/BiffaPlaysIndie.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
INDIGINOUS VOICES MINI-SERIES LAUNCH
Last June Stuart and William had a nice in depth conversation around the right to roam, which was sparked by a question sent in by one of our podcast listeners, Cliff from Radley, Oxfordshire, England, which was discussed in the episode 'Reclaiming Land Through Mass Trespass'.
For the follow up conversation, they invited Heli Paulasto, Senior Lecturer in English Language And Culture at the University of Eastern Finland, to offer a Finnish perspective on this topic.
This is the video to part 1 of this conversation with Heli, you can hear part 2 (and also see the filmed version of part 2) by becoming an Indigenous Champion support tier Patreon backer. All of which was released earlier today. Become a Patreon today at https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
INDIGINOUS VOICES MINI-SERIES LAUNCH
Last June Stuart and William had a nice in depth conversation around the right to roam, which was sparked by a question sent in by one of our podcast listeners, Cliff from Radley, Oxfordshire, England, which was discussed in the episode 'Reclaiming Land Through Mass Trespass'.
For the follow up conversation, they invited Heli Paulasto, Senior Lecturer in English Language And Culture at the University of Eastern Finland, to offer a Finnish perspective on this topic.
This is part 1 of this conversation with Heli, you can hear part 2 (and also see the filmed version of part 2) by becoming an Indigenous Champion support tier Patreon backer. Become a Patreon today at https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
A filmed version of part 1 of this chat will be released over the next few hours as a video podcast on Spotify, and also on our YouTube Channel too https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCl5Mo4k8ezK6HlZhAHfkjIw
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Is it realistic to protect Orangutans from destruction of their habitat by the discouragement of Palm Oil, by changing what we have on our plates?”
This is a question sent in by listener Patryk from Edinburgh, Scotland.
You can send Stuart and William a question to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate. Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
So join Stuart and William on another roaming, insightful, and slightly ridiculous discussion, as they explore this question. They're not experts, they will however delve into the subject, in a relatable way, for you the listener.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Ok, so I’ve heard, but not checked the accuracy of the data, that Brussels Airlines run 3000 empty flights to maintain take-off and landing slots. Then again, Lufthansa run 18,000. You mentioned Stuart, that a whistle-blower at an English airport, told you the super-rich were chartering large planes to fly them around the world, alone. Just them, and the crew on the flight. Is this really the actions of a civilised society, guided by science and not capital?".
In this podcast you never know what itch the conversation Stuart and William have is going to scratch, and this episode where they discuss, digest, and explore a question from listener Roman in Slovakia is no exception.
During this episode an 'Independent' article about empty flights is mentioned which backs up Roman's question. We also mention flightradar24, a global flight tracking service, that provides you with real-time information about thousands of aircraft around the world, at any given moment in time.
Also, in this episode we mention Tommy's Outdoors podcast.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Women shouldn’t be overlooked in forming part of the solutions to counteracting human impact on the climate and the earths ecosystems. Please explore”
A longer episode than we've been releasing recently, so we suggest you find a good mug of tea, and a nice comfortable place to sit and listen, as Stuart and William embark on another unscripted, searching, insightful laypersons chat, as they discuss a question from Ella in Heaton Mersey, Stockport, Greater Manchester, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Before COP26, young Greta said 1.5 limits to carbon output might not be achieved, but increasing to 2.5 is ok, as we can always do something to improve things, and not just give up. I’ve seen Climate crisis deniers have a field day with this seeming moving of the goals posts. Is it wise to be flexible when talking about the targeted figures?”
In this episode Stuart and William delve into, investigate, and explore the question above, which was sent in by listener Felicity, from Honduras.
They're not experts, they will however explore this question, in a relatable way, for you, the listener.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“People walked 100’s of miles to attend COP26 in Glasgow, Scotland, recently - answering calls to not burn fossil fuels when traveling to protests. This was met with further criticisms that the protesters still stink, are entitled, on benefits, and also the question was constantly asked if the protestors were meat eaters, and why were they still wearing plastic and animal based clothes whilst protesting? Will protestors ever win and will keyboard critics ever stop criticising?”
It's time for another very real, unscripted discussion, that really could go anywhere, with hosts Stuart and William, as they embark on another exploration of a listener question, from Ivy in Worthing, East Sussex, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Enjoying your jokes at my expense guys, I’m still here though, so if you’re trying to get rid of me, you need to try harder. Ok, my question ...
President Biden visited the Pope recently. He flew to Italy, and imported 80 cars, which formed his protective entourage. Whatever they chatted about when they met, does it justify the level of pollution caused to make them happen?”
Stuart and William once more delve into, examine, and discuss a question from listener Pedro, I say Pedro, from Lisbon, Portugal.
They explore this in their usual unprepared style, and speak their truths, as they see them, at this point, with the usual healthy dose of humour thrown in for good measure.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Cleaning up beaches, and removing washed up plastic, is that really doing anything? To me, what's collected, is going back into the system that deposited it on the beaches in the first place. Is this a pointless exercise until the tap is turned off that's filling our oceans with plastic?”
Stuart and William were once again able to record face to face, which leads to a very real, and intimate conversation as they discuss, dissect and examine a question from listener Roman, from Slovakia.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
“Try and stretch this one out fellas! I’ve heard, unneeded and unused data, that's stored in the UK, which include photos etc, use up the equivalent energy to store them as 100’s of return flights to Australia and back. I’ve also heard that paperless billing, that's now gone digital, still needs to be stored somewhere, again consuming vast energy volumes. Any thoughts on these claims?”
This is the question that was sent in by long time listener Ivy, in Worthing, West Sussex, England.
Once again, Stuart and William, delve into, discuss, and perhaps, slightly overanalyse this question. Often serious, often silly, in fact this episode is both, in equal measure. Our podcast rarely lacks the colourful dimension that is humour.
What we guarantee you though, is a good rounded conversation on this podcast, not really a debate, even though it says that on the tin. We give you authentic views, no scripts, real opinions, and real discussions.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"I was listening the other day when you were asking about discussion questions, and wondered what you thought about the rise in use of drones? A great tool for agriculture and photography, or a real pest, danger to the public and animals, and an invasion of privacy?"
This podcast is about having conversations that need having. It's in a conversational style, with real opinions, real discussions, where we hope to break down the big issues into bite sized chunks.
In this episode Stuart and William delve into, investigate, and explore the question above, which was sent in by listener Hedley Thorne, from Oxfordshire, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"You’ve been talking a lot about this, but please keep going. The green economic revolution is an illusion! If the hidden values, morels and agendas are about perpetual growth, it will mean more mineral extraction and the levels of unsustainability we witness in the current system. Its not about capitalism or communism, even though both are closer bedfellows than they may have us believe. Both focus on constant growth.
To me, it seems to be about finding a new framework to live by, with elements of both these systems. Its true, I believe, that the fossil fuel industry have helped people out of poverty, but has already placed some in poverty.
For example, there are endless cases of societies being evicted from lands, in pursuit of mineral extractions etc. Its not just in colonial days, its still happening now, but pushed under the carpet. The current value system we collectively hold will see more and more of us saying hello to poverty and destitution.
No one yet has a system to replace what we have, but its about getting all the big thinkers, around a table, to find that new adaptable system, to organize our varied societies around. We need to find better ways to sustain human wellbeing, and increase it, as both communism and capitalism have failed us to a degree."
Stuart and William record face to face again as they discuss, investigate, and explore a question from listener Ahana, in Assam, India.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Growth in the green economy, low carbon industries as it were, isn’t necessarily the success people suggest. There are indeed more cycles, but there are also more planes. There are indeed more electric cars, which you’ve discussed on the podcast, but there are also more petrol cars.
No matter how many good things we do, unless we stop expanding the bad, there’s no chance of reversing the ecological, climate and societal breakdowns we potentially face. Low carbon industries within the fossil fuel driven economy, fuels the fossil fuel industries in my view.
Money generated by green economies fuels the high carbon industries. The example I observe and offer up is those made rich by the green economy, spend their wealth on flying and on other unsustainable elitist past times.
Green industries are driving new resource rushes, Lithium extraction and pollution etc.
I’ve heard somewhere that the oil industry reports it will keep growing well into the 2030’s. Where are we going wrong? Its true, economic growth pulled some societies out of poverty, cured desperation and even some diseases and child abuse.
But, ignoring that beyond a certain point, that same constant growth and use of natural resources, will soon put many pack into poor situations. Reducing life expectancy. Chew on that lot guys, make of it what you will."
The above is a question that has been sent into by a long term listener Alex from Poland, and once again Stuart and William were able to record face to face, leading as always to a very unique feeling conversation. They aren't experts, they just speak their truths, as they see them, at this point.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Is it a good idea to dissolve personal assumptions now and then, and shine a fresh light on personal perspectives?"
Stuart and William once more embark on a roaming, natural style of conversation, with a healthy dose of humour as they explore a question from listener Dave in Cheshire, England. They're not experts, they will however explore this question, in a relatable way, for you, the listener.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"I love you don’t prepare too much for the questions you cover, it makes your exploration, from the starting point, the same as the listeners. I don’t want you guys to be the go to experts, more the go to relatable explorers.
My question is, Belgium philosopher Ingrid Robeyns coined the phrase ‘Limitarianism’. She argues there should be an upper limit to the amount of income and wealth a person can amass, just as there’s a line of poverty we recognise no-one should fall below. We should recognise both a poverty and riches line. Surplus money enables too much power to be exerted over others, and over earth's resources. We can just aim for continued growth, but equally, for more people to increase their wellbeing going forward and flourish, we can no longer afford the super rich. Super rich exist, because others are poor. Growth has drawn people out of poverty, but unchecked, can put people back into poverty. The super rich and rich are likely to be the last affected by climate breakdown, if it comes. The poor are more likely to be affected more and suffer worse.
Please explore this in your usual unprepared style, and speak your truths, as you see them, at this point. Thanks".
Stuart and William were once again able to record face to face, which leads to a very real, and intimate conversation as they discuss, examine, and delve into a question from long time listener Rory in Darwin, Australia.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In today's bonus episode, your hosts Stuart and William, discuss questions from the first ever Environmental Debate Live & Unscripted event that happened in the Autumn of 2021. The podcast format, expanded and evolved, then set in front of a live audience.
During the pilot live event, that took place on the 25th September 2021, the audience were given the opportunity to place a question, that they would like to be discussed in the second half of the show. The questions were placed in Stuart's hat, and then drawn out at random.
Unfortunately, we only had time to discuss two of the seven questions received. These were;
- Neil Rowe asked: Is it the cow or the how? Badger Cull, Pro's and Con's?
- Sue Roberts asked: Building 100,000 houses in Oxfordshire will use up most of the carbon budget Oxfordshire can emit to keep its climate contribution below 1.5c. How can we stop the juggernaut of unneeded homes for greed not need?
The questions we didn't get around to discussing were:
- Richard Harding didn't get around to asking: How can we engage more people in sustainable living? Most people want to but seem unable to take action?
- Laura didn't get around to asking: Should we cook with electricity or gas?
- Lyn didn't get around to asking: Electric cars need to have disposal of batteries sorted out b4 change to electric. The components need to be disassembled and this needs more research as the current batteries can't be taken apart. Disposal/recycling has not been thought through?
- Martin didn't get around to asking: What's the environmental footprint of manufacturing batteries for EV's?
- Carol didn't get around to asking: I'm worried about the impact of housing development on Warren Meadow on Town Furze in Oxford will have on Lye Valley.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Is the culture we’re born into the main factor in blocking self determining thought? Thoughts that lead to decisions, actions etc that lead to better quality of life, individually and collectively. Is it that habits and comfort zones, which may indeed be a product of culture, are blocking us instead? Or, is it a lack of guided pathways out of the current trajectory?
What impacts do attitude, perception and mindsets have on our decisions? Maybe you think its something not set out above that is the main factor in blocking self determining thought?
Is what led us to human consciousness, the same thing that limits us, or is it humanities frailty that we are creatures of habit that limits our ability to truly self analyse and thus tap into the awesome power of said human consciousness?
Is human evolution lagging behind the abilities human consciousness offers us, and can these ever align? Meaning the innate specie traits cease to also block the potential opportunities that human kinds understanding, consciousness, awareness, perception, offers us?"
Stuart and William were once again able to record face to face, which leads to a different feel to the episode don't you think? In this iteration of the podcast they delve into, discuss, and philosophise around a question from listener Ahana, in Assam, India.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"I’ve not sent in a question since early 2020, and you actually covered it on Aug 4th 2020. I’m back though! I’ve heard during the Extinction Rebellion protests in the UK, a handful of Police have taken XR stickers, and stuck them to the inside of their helmets. Is this a turning point?"
In another out and about recording at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market, with a small audience watching on, Stuart and William launch into another exploration of yet another a listener question, from Dave in Cheshire, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
It's a Happy New Year from your hosts, Stuart and William. Thanks for being with us throughout 2021, we look forward to seeing you again in 2022.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Do you consider yourself an intellectual podcast with a political left leaning view, or more open minded in essence?
In this episode, we find Stuart and William, out and about, recording at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market, where they discuss, and digest a question from listener Devan in Jamaica. The first time we've heard from her, and we hope she'll send another searching question in soon.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Is human survival a niche interest, proactively marginalised by those wanting to distract us away from the biggest threat man has to face?"
Once again, Stuart and William, delve into, discuss, and perhaps slightly overanalyse a question from a long-term listener, which this time comes from Ivy in Worthing, West Sussex, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William wish you a Merry Christmas in their own unique and particular way, with lots of silliness and humour. We hope you have a great festive period.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Is meandering conversation the best way to go for the podcast or should it be more focused? Are you trying to educate or entertain?"
Stuart and William once more embark on a roaming, natural style of conversation. They're not experts, they will however explore this question, in a relatable way, for you, the listener.
Today they're discussing a question from listener Alex in Poland.
During this episode Stuart and William mention the Tommy's Outdoors podcast. You can find out more about this by going to https://tommysoutdoors.com/ They met Tommy at an online networking event for podcasters, organized by The Mic's Club, details here https://twitter.com/MICsPodcastClub
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this final of three consecutive re-releases, William is looking back and celebrating our top 3 performing episodes.
The episode you're about to hear, is our third best performer, ever. Originally released on the 24th January 2021, this will be the second time this episode has been released.
The question that we explored, and mulled over during this episode came from listener Rupert in Tring, Hertfordshire, England: "When it comes to arguing for human caused climate change, or against it, is it possible to base either viewpoint on facts, when much of what we face is still an unknown?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this second of three consecutive re-releases, William is looking back and celebrating our top 3 performing episodes.
The episode you're about to hear, is our second best performer, ever. Originally released on the 13th September 2020, it was a follow up to a pervious episode released on the 16th August 2020, and is the only time we've ever revisited a listener question on the podcast.
The question we revisited was from listener Bartek, in Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England: "Are electric cars really the future?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this first of three consecutive re-releases, William looks back at one of our top 3 performing episodes.
The episode you're about to hear, is our best performing, ever. Originally released on the 26th January 2021, it was then subsequently rereleased on 24th August 2021.
During this episode Stuart and William discussed and chewed over the following question, from listener Maureen in Chalgrove, Oxfordshire, England: "People debate if inland wind turbines are nice, or ugly. Is this a redundant argument, when the aim behind this is that we're all trying to protect our beautiful planet, meaning wind power is part of the mix?
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark International Anti Corruption Day, in this bonus episode for you of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
Corruption affects all areas of society. Preventing corruption, unlocks progress towards the sustainable development goals, helps protect our planet, creates jobs, achieves gender equality, and secures wider access to essential services, such as healthcare and education.
While it is everyone’s right to benefit from strong anti-corruption efforts, misconduct and wrongdoing is stealing away valuable resources, at a time when they are most needed to respond to, and recover from the COVID-19 crisis.
The 2021 International Anti-Corruption Day seeks to highlight the rights and responsibilities of everyone - including States, Government officials, civil servants, law enforcement officers, media representatives, the private sector, civil society, academia, the public and youth - in tackling corruption.
You can find out more by following this link; https://www.un.org/en/observances/anti-corruption-day
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Net zero is not true net zero, as it seems the fossil fuel industry has convinced the UK government to only reduce future emissions by 50%. With the balance secured through carbon capture via tech, not yet invented. What about absorbing the crap we’ve already put out there?"
What we guarantee you is a good rounded conversation on this podcast, not really a debate, even though it says that on the tin. We give you authentic views, no scripts, real opinions, and real discussions.
So join Stuart and William, as the head off along another meandering discussion, and the tackle a question from long term listener, Alan in Northway, Oxford, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Each generation perceives the state of nature, when they were a child, as good and normal. We might notice loss in our lifetime, but do we understand, or even notice the depleting baseline of the living world, that our life is set in?"
Stuart and William once more embark on a roaming, natural style of conversation. They're not experts, they will however explore this question, in a relatable way, for you, the listener.
Today they're discussing a question from listener Bushra in India.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Is the council not mowing the grassed areas in Oxford, a genuine attempt at rewilding, or a consequence of labour and funding shortages?"
It says in the title of this podcast, that its a debate, but this is more a conversational style podcast. What we guarantee you is, real discussions, real opinions, real views, no scripts.
Join hosts Stuart and William, as they examine a question from long time listener Alan, in Northway, Oxford, England.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Humans contribute 3% to co2 emissions and 97% is produced by nature. Are we being sold the great green agenda? Is it all a big con?"
Join Stuart and William on another roaming and insightful discussion. They're not experts, they will however explore this question, in a relatable way for you the listener.
Today they embark on discussing a question from listener Carida from Jamaica.
Often, the underlying themes of nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, social justice and sustainability come through this explorative style of conversation. All these subjects interplay with each other when one digs down into many of the big issues we all face.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message and that recording can then be considered for inclusion in a future edition of the podcast.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts
https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Is mass tree planting really the holy grail we perceive it to be?"
Join hosts Stuart and William, in their usual far reaching discussion style podcast, as they mull over a question from Bushra, in India.
Their aim, generally, is to divide all the issues into bite sized chunks, and along the way, challenge and contest their own and your mindsets, habits, and beliefs.
Often, the underlying themes of nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, social justice and sustainability come through that explorative conversation. All these subjects interplay with each other when one digs down into many of the big issues we all face.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message and that recording can then be considered for inclusion in a future edition of the podcast.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts
https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Our failure to comprehend the ecology that inhabits the darkness, limits humanities true understanding of the living world around us. There’s lots of unseen life out there. Can you share your thoughts around this?"
Once again, join Stuart and William on another wandering and insightful discussion. Often serious, often silly, in fact this episode is both, in equal measure. Today they embark on discussing a listener question, from Brinda in India.
As always with every episode of the podcast, they allow the conversation to flow, bringing it back to the key point periodically, as this process is often where the powerful conclusions come from for the topic that is being discussed.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message and that recording can then be considered for inclusion in a future edition of the podcast.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts
https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"The government in the UK, has declared a climate emergency, yet has still to formally address the nation. Wouldn’t you have thought this would happen as standard in some form or other, if it were a genuine declaration?"
An unscripted real exploration, with genuine opinions, as hosts Stuart and William examine a listener question from Victor in North London, England.
They're not experts, they will however delve into the subject, in a relatable way, for you the listener.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message and that recording can then be considered for inclusion in a future edition of the podcast.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"We hardly ever see any reports in UK of African disasters. Is this a cover up, a left over attitude from colonial days, or are these far off events just not relevant? European disasters don’t always get news time either, so is this void on African news nothing to really worry about?"
With authentic views, unscripted, unrehearsed, unplanned opinions, hosts Stuart (who is the mainstay of this podcast), and William (who without Stuart, would be nothing), embark on another meandering deeply penetrating conversation, as they explore a listener question from Adwin, in South Africa.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message and that recording can then be considered for inclusion in a future edition of the podcast.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts
https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Climate protestors are too often dismissed as people who should go back to work, or comments are made that the benefits system is paying too well, allowing people to protest. Protesters are either privileged white middle class, or stinking, soap dodging, drop outs.
Why don’t people engage with the person in front of them, and see why they’ve really been moved to protest? Does this mean the critics have lost the argument? Are climate crisis deniers really deniers, or to shit scared to face what's really before us?"
Join Stuart and William on another roaming discussion. Today they are discussing a listener question, from Denny in Colorado, USA. They're not experts, they will however explore this question, in a relatable way, for you the listener.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message and that recording can then be considered for inclusion in a future edition of the podcast.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Protesters are protesting for system change, but the system, whatever it is, doesn't want to change. The system is taking away the right and ability to protest bit by bit here in the UK. Protest can often be the last option for people, take that away, and what have we left? This is designed to make people arrestable, so they can be removed, but is it provoking violence, freedom fighters, gorilla wars, terrorism, war, however you wish to phrase it?"
This is the question that was sent in by long time listener Alan in Northway, Oxford, England. We've lost count how many he's now sent in.
Join Stuart and William on another roaming and insightful discussion, as they explore this question. They're not experts, they will however delve into the subject, in a relatable way, for you the listener.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message and that recording can then be considered for inclusion in a future edition of the podcast.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Citizen journalism, by the people for the people, is that the future?"
Two men, one in his 40s, the other tipping into his 50's, recording face to face, for the final time for a while.
Stuart and William take on a question sent in by listener Ebba from Västra Götaland, Sweden, which they approach in their usual open, and honest way. This is Ebba's first question and it's hoped she sends a follow up one too.
Stuart and William are here to persuade, entertain and inspire you to make different choices in the way we go forward in life, individually and collectively.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message and that recording can then be considered for inclusion in a future edition of the podcast.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William mark World Vegan Day in this bonus episode for you of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
The event takes place every November 1st, which has been chosen as it is an international day of action for animals rights!
The commemoration of this event began in 1994 by a UK celebrity, Louise Wallis, who was at the time the chair of The Vegan Society, as they celebrated its 50th birthday, the coinage of the terms vegan and veganism, as well as the inception of The Vegan Society.
Not wanting the event to coincide with others like Day of the Dead and Halloween, and because of the doubts as to the exact date in November 1944 when the society was started, Wallis decided to go with the first day of November.
You can find out more by following this link; https://bit.ly/3BuKwcU
Also find out more about the Vegan Society by following this link: https://www.vegansociety.com/
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"White man see’s land and resources as something to own, indigenous cultures don’t have the same focus on ownership, whose right and whose wrong?"
Once again, Stuart and William were able to record face to face, which lead to the usual roaming style of conversation you've likely become accustomed to after over 225 episodes. This time they explore a question from Ahana in Assam, India.
These conversations often touch upon the same six themes, nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, social justice and sustainability, whilst still striving to make nature's voice heard.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message and it can then be considered for inclusion in a future edition of the podcast.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Is time spent in nature a luxury or a necessity?"
Stuart and William recorded face to face again, which brings a different dynamic to the show, don't you think? As always they launch themselves off on a meandering conversation as they discuss this time a question from listener Amishi, in Uttar Pradesh, India.
Often the underlying themes of nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, social justice and sustainability come through that conversation. All these subjects interplay with each other when one digs down into many of the big issues we all face.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Regarding the climate crisis and life in general, are small steps better than big?"
Once again, join Stuart and William on another roaming and insightful discussion. This time they recorded face to face in Stuart's living room, marking the first they'd recorded in this manner since March 2020.
They're not experts, they will however explore this question, in a relatable way for you the listener.
Today they embark on discussing a question from listener Anika in Gujarat, India.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Many people claim protesters and activists are obviously rich to be able to take time out to protest. I don’t see this myself, I see ordinary people, some rich, some poor, making sacrifices to protest.
I see wealthier people, using their savings, making themselves poor, to fund protesting. I see poor people, with nothing, sacrificing the little they have to protest.
The wealthier are called entitled, the poor accused of funding protests via benefits. These insults contribute nothing, they are just words. We’re all just renting the space we inhabit, none of us truly own anything.
My big concern is individualising the solutions to the climate and ecological crisis we most certainly face, takes the pressure off the fossil fuel industries, who are the big players in saving humanity".
Join hosts Stuart and William, in their usual far reaching discussion style podcast, as they examine a question from Wendy in Exeter, Devon, England.
They're here to persuade, entertain and inspire you to make different choices in the way we go forward in life, individually and collectively.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Is there a difference between thinking and feeling?"
This question was sent in by someone who routinely listens, Alan in Northway, Oxford, England.
It's a very different style of question he's directed at the podcast this time, very different to the ones he's sent in before.
As always though, Stuart and William embark on another roaming and insightful discussion. Their aim generally is to break all the issues into bite sized chunks, and along the way challenge their own and your mindsets, habits, and beliefs.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message.
Support this work through Patreon or just 'follow' so you don't miss any of the public posts https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Humanity faces big planetary changes in many ways, not just regarding climate. To embrace true change though in things like social justice, we need navigable paths, and a vision of a positive quality of life. I think exploring pathways to sustainable optimism is the core for all challenges we face as individuals, and as a society, whatever the issue. The power of a vision of optimism generates its own energy, and we don’t need to mine minerals to keep that going. Optimism can be a global transformation mechanism, spreading through us as individuals, and as a society. Is this a utopia ideal or an achievable reality?"
Once again, join Stuart and William on another roaming and insightful discussion. Often serious, often silly, in fact this episode is both, in equal measure. Today they embark on discussing a listener question, from Denny in Colorado, USA.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question. Or you can record your question in your own voice by going to https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"If the climate crisis was front page news, every day, the public would demand we do something about it, and those with vested interests, and billionaires that own the media, would lose their short term cash cow".
Stuart and William once again embark on a roaming natural style of conversation. Making what could be a deep academic debate, into a relatable and accessible exploration for everyone. The big issues are something we all need to engage with, so listen in as they discuss a question from listener Robert in Arizona, USA.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"John Kerry, part of Joe Biden’s team, has I’m told said that you don’t need to give up meat or anything and uninvented things will save us. I’m not sure he actually said this? What do you guys think of anyone who says that?"
Another unscripted, searching, insightful laypersons chat, between hosts Stuart and William, as discuss a question sent in from long time listener Vandana, in India.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Alternative fuels and energy maybe in some ways renewable, but doesn’t it still need mineral extraction in part?"
Another spontaneous, improvised, insightful chat, from a laymen's standpoint, between hosts Stuart and William. A very real deliberation, as they examine another listener question, this time from Adwin in South Africa.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William mark World Vegetarian Day in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
World Vegetarian Day is observed annually around the planet on October 1st. It is a day of celebration, established by the North American Vegetarian Society in 1977 and endorsed by the International Vegetarian Union in 1978, "To promote the joy, compassion and life-enhancing possibilities of vegetarianism". It brings awareness to the ethical, environmental, health, and humanitarian benefits of a vegetarian lifestyle.
You can find out more by following this link; https://worldvegetarianday.navs-online.org/
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
A bit of fun for you, a bonus episode from a recent outing Stuart and William had at the East Oxford Farmers' and Community Market where they had a stall.
This out and about recording includes a question from listener Jules in Oxford. He asked;
"Our landlord and come and stripped out everything in our front garden because we'd let it get overgrown. What sort of plants would you suggest to put in there that'll look pretty and be easy to manage?"
This question sparked another spontaneous, improvised, insightful chat, between hosts Stuart and William.
ANNOUNCEMENT!
Stuart and William will be leading an alphabet walk around the Turrill Sculpture Garden in Summertown, Oxford.
What makes this an alphabet walk? Well, William and Stuart will take a letter each, and work their way through the alphabet, to focus our attention on the world around us through their separate areas of expertise.
Book your ticket today via Eventbrite:
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/discover-the-turrill-sculpture-garden-through-an-alphabet-walk-tickets-169453228167
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Do the public suffer with climate emergency fatigue?"
Join Stuart and William for another wide ranging conversation, that really could go anywhere, as they discuss and explore, from an laymen's perspective, a question this time from listener Anzu in Japan.
ANNOUNCEMENT!
Stuart and William will be leading an alphabet walk around the Turrill Sculpture Garden in Summertown, Oxford.
What makes this an alphabet walk? Well, William and Stuart will take a letter each, and work their way through the alphabet, to focus our attention on the world around us through their separate areas of expertise.
Book your ticket today via Eventbrite:
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/discover-the-turrill-sculpture-garden-through-an-alphabet-walk-tickets-169453228167
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"Does direct action from protests get anyone, anywhere? "
Using their nomadic and roaming, unscripted conversational style, your hosts and well known personalities Stuart and William, offer up a very real discussion with authentic views, as they take a deep dive and explore another listener question, this time from Adriana in the Netherlands.
As always, with every episode of the podcast, they allow the conversation to flow, bringing it back to the key point periodically, as this process is often where the powerful conclusions come from for the topic that is being discussed.
ANNOUNCEMENT!
Stuart and William will be leading an alphabet walk around the Turrill Sculpture Garden in Summertown, Oxford.
What makes this an alphabet walk? Well, William and Stuart will take a letter each, and work their way through the alphabet, to focus our attention on the world around us through their separate areas of expertise.
Book your ticket today via Eventbrite:
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/discover-the-turrill-sculpture-garden-through-an-alphabet-walk-tickets-169453228167
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hopefully this podcast will help persuade you, entertain you, inspire you, and inform you. Stretch your thinking at the very least!
Stuart and William, once again head off on another roaming, meandering discussion, exploring and examining a listener question, this time from Adel in Christchurch, New Zealand.
The question, is simply, "Who’s in charge?".
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
SECOND ANNOUNCEMENT! Stuart and William will be leading an alphabet walk around the Turrill Sculpture Garden in Summertown, Oxford.
What makes this an alphabet walk? Well, William and Stuart will take a letter each, and work their way through the alphabet, to focus our attention on the world around us through their separate areas of expertise.
Book your ticket today via Eventbrite:
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/discover-the-turrill-sculpture-garden-through-an-alphabet-walk-tickets-169453228167
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"What's the environment? Is it different for all of us?"
As with every episode, Stuart and William allow the conversation to flow, bringing it back to the key question periodically, so as not to disappear down a rabbit hole. That process often where the biggest insights come from.
In this instalment they discuss, explore, and mull over a question, from listener Amin, in Pakistan.
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
SECOND ANNOUNCEMENT! Stuart and William will be leading an alphabet walk around the Turrill Sculpture Garden in Summertown, Oxford.
What makes this an alphabet walk? Well, William and Stuart will take a letter each, and work their way through the alphabet, to focus our attention on the world around us through their separate areas of expertise.
Book your ticket today via Eventbrite:
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/discover-the-turrill-sculpture-garden-through-an-alphabet-walk-tickets-169453228167
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, mull over, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"How do you keep listeners happy? Do you change the format/content of the podcast for the sake of change, or is it part of wider strategy?"
Once again Stuart and William were able to record face to face, in Stuart's back garden, which certainly leads to a different style of episode than usual, don't you think?
In this episode they discuss and explore a question, this time from long time listener Vandana, in India.
As always with every episode of the podcast, they allow the conversation to flow, bringing it back to the key point periodically, as this process is often where the powerful conclusions come from for the topic that is being discussed.
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
SECOND ANNOUNCEMENT! Stuart and William will be leading an alphabet walk around the Turrill Sculpture Garden in Summertown, Oxford.
What makes this an alphabet walk? Well, William and Stuart will take a letter each, and work their way through the alphabet, to focus our attention on the world around us through their separate areas of expertise.
Book your ticket today via Eventbrite:
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/discover-the-turrill-sculpture-garden-through-an-alphabet-walk-tickets-169453228167
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
"How many more episodes of this podcast do you expect to do? Do you plan to go out at the top, or stop when interest wains?" (Madeline in Barton, Oxford, England).
Once again Stuart and William were able to record this episode face to face, in Stuart's back garden. It really does lead to a different style of conversation don't you think? Well there is at least a little more silliness when they get together in person!
As always with every episode of the podcast, they allow the conversation to flow, bringing it back to the key point periodically, as this process is often where the powerful conclusions come from to the topic that is being discussed.
In this instalment, they're exploring and examining a listener question again, this time from Madeline in Barton, Oxford, England. Her first question!
"How many more episodes do you expect to do? Do you plan to go out at the top, or stop when interest wains?"
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
SECOND ANNOUNCEMENT! Stuart and William will be leading an alphabet walk an Alphabet Walk around the Turrill Sculpture Garden in Summertown, Oxford.
What makes this an alphabet walk? Well, William and Stuart will take a letter each, and work their way through the alphabet, to focus our attention on the world around us.
Book your ticket today via Eventbrite:
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/discover-the-turrill-sculpture-garden-through-an-alphabet-walk-tickets-169453228167
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark the International Day For Clean Air And Blue Skies in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
Following the international community's increasing interest in clean air, and emphasizing the need to make further efforts to improve air quality to protect human health, the United Nations General Assembly has designated September 7th as the International Day of Clean Air and blue skies.
The theme for this year’s International Day of Clean Air for blue skies is, “Healthy Air, Healthy Planet” which emphasizes the health effects of air pollution, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Day aims to prioritize the need for healthy air for all, while keeping conversations broad enough to encompass other critical issues, such as climate change, human and planetary health, as well as the Sustainable Development Goals.
It serves as a rallying call to action, to collectively align efforts, and claim the right to clean air.
You can find out more by following this link; https://www.unep.org/events/un-day/global-observance-2nd-international-day-clean-air-blue-skies
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
For the first time in a while, Stuart and William were able to record face to face, in Stuart's back garden, which certainly leads to a different style of episode than usual don't you think?
As always though, they meander, asking searching inquisitive questions, in this off the cuff and unscripted conversation.
In this instalment of the podcast, they're exploring and examining a listener question, this time from Paula in Rose Hill, Oxford, England. " What are your first memories of nature?"
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
These are the conversations that need having!
Once again, with authentic views, unscripted, unrehearsed, unplanned opinions, hosts Stuart and William embark on another meandering, insightful conversation, as they explore a listener question from Reginald in Kidlington, Oxfordshire, England.
"As a climate crisis denier I put forward the following:
No-one has the slightest idea why a three degree rise in planetary temperatures should be avoided.
The recent temperate rises have provided only benefits to humankind, so why would further rises not? No-one has the faintest idea, but it’s a better story if it is painted as an existential problem.
In a purposeless and irrational universe, it’s not rational to think humans are in a unique position of self determined agency in such issues.
There are plenty of opinions, even supposed consensus, but in a scientific method sense, no cause and effect evidence shows that a three degree rise is anything to worry about. Or that three degrees is related to man made CO2. Until that’s available, it’s all doom mongering, and catastrophic speculation, therefore, devoid of any use. Who knows who’s right, and who’s wrong?
I (Reginald) don’t know, nor do the public, nor do our leaders, nor do the fossil fuel industry, nor do the scientists. What evidence is there that shows the future for our kids is unliveable? I know a lot of people on TV say that, but where’s the evidence? Where’s the evidence that the future is unliveable?
If you believe a three degree planetary rise is avoidable, that’s up to you. But protesters often unfairly don’t highlight some of the actions being taken, which clearly aren't enough, in their view, and creates a false picture of complete inaction by our leaders. This suits climate protesters, and their often anti-capitalist agenda, they're not about the climate. I suspect as a climate denier, you won’t air my views, but there it is".
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Recently, hosts Stuart and William were joined by Dr. Tara Pirie from the University of Reading as a guest on this podcast. In today's bonus episode, Tara reflects on her appearance on the podcast, and what impact it had on her.
Tara will be a guest panelist for our live face to face event being held on the 25th September at The Bothy Vineyard, scroll down for more details, and how you can book your ticket today.
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Recently hosts Stuart and William were joined by Dr. Tara Pirie from the University of Reading as a guest on this podcast. While Tara was with them she recorded this call to action, where she encourages you and us all to look at the little things you can change in your life, that can benefit the planet.
Tara will be a guest panelist for our live face to face event being held on the 25th September, scroll down for more details, and how you can book your ticket today.
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
We've had a face to face guest at long last! It's been so long that hosts Stuart and William, had actually forgotten what it's like to have a guest on the show. Stuart did say as much as he likes working with William, it's nice to have a new voice on the podcast.
Who was the guest they welcomed? It was Dr. Tara Pirie from the University of Reading. Tara developed a passion for wildlife from a very early age, and since graduating as a zoologist has experience as a zookeeper, safari guide, researcher and conservationist. Tara gained her PhD studying leopards and the conflict between them (and other carnivores) and humans while living in South Africa. Although these roles are diverse, they all incorporated aspects of education and conservation, the latter being Tara's area of environmental interest.
Tara will be a guest panelist for the live face to face event being held on the 25th September, scroll down for more details, and how you can book your ticket today.
The three questions discussed for this episode were;
[William's Question] When it comes to travelling around the UK, taking the train is often seen as the worst option. The perception is that they're late, expensive, and slow. This leads to more people flying as the perception is that method is cheaper, more reliable and faster. Is it false economy though, considering the environmental damage the flight industry causes? Is it time we really challenged these assumptions?
[Tara's Question] Do zoos contribute to conservation or are they just entertainment?
[Stuart's Question] Ignoring climate change deniers risks them ignoring us?
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their nomadic and roaming, unscripted style, your hosts and well known personalities Stuart and William offer up a very real and animated discussion with authentic views, as they take a deep dive and explore another listener question, this time from Roman in Slovakia.
"Will there ever be a time when habitual consumption will be frowned upon?
You both say (Stuart, and William) you don’t own cars. Isn’t the boycotting of those purchases cutting your nose off despite your faces?
Aren’t you limiting yourselves by not making these purchases?"
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their usual unscripted, meandering conversation style to explore big issues in a relatable way, hosts Stuart and William delve into yet another listener question (keep them coming), from Paco in Wimbledon, London, England.
"Is it justified nowadays to use trespass and squatting activities to highlight disparity between the haves and the have nots? Especially as there are now loads of empty domestic and commercial properties out there in the UK.
While these places remain empty, our leaders keep building, building, building to house the homeless, and those in overcrowded populations. Is there an argument for the people to mobilise and use trespass and squatting activities to reclaim these lands, and properties that are still empty for the people?
Or is in unfair on the people who own these entities? Or is that where the issue really is? Ownership; we don’t really own anything, we’re mere custodians, which is a very Buddhistic way of looking at things. Is property ownership in all its terms, where we’re going wrong?"
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore, discuss, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
CLASSIC EPISODE: We're delving into our archive once again today, to bring you our best performing episode of the podcast. In this one, Stuart introduces our most listened to episode of the entire podcast, do you have any ideas as to why this particular edition performed so well?
Originally released on the 26th January 2021, Stuart and William (your hosts), discuss a question sent in by Maureen in Chalgrove, Oxfordshire, England, who set the following;
""People debate if inland wind turbines are nice, or ugly. Is this a redundant argument, when the aim behind this is that we're all trying to protect our beautiful planet, meaning wind power is part of the mix?"
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William raise awareness of a day that's important for us all to be conscious of, the International Day Of Remembrance Of The Slave Trade and Its Abolition.
The night of 22nd to 23 August 1791, in Santo Domingo (today Haiti and the Dominican Republic), saw the beginning of the uprising that would play a crucial role in the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade.
It's against this background that the International Day for the Remembrance of the Slave Trade and its Abolition is commemorated, on 23 August each year.
You can find out more be following this link; https://en.unesco.org/commemorations/slavetraderemembranceday
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
CLASSIC EPISODE: We're delving into our archive today, bringing you one of our best performing episodes of the podcast. In this one, William introduces the most listened to episode that had a guest in it. Originally released on the 14th April 2020, Stuart and William (your hosts), welcomed Rebecca and Paul Whitewick, when they discussed amongst other topics, HS2, car dependency, and our CO2 footprint.
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join hosts Stuart and William, in their usual far reaching discussion style podcast, as they examine a question from listener Eric in Oslo, Norway.
"Looking at it from a social justice, climatic, ethical, and moral stance. Where are the lines between self education, about where humanity is possibly heading, resisting, rebelling, and disrupting the system to bring about change, and personal adaptation to what is, potentially, heading our way?
My (Eric’s) second point is, is adapting to the changes ahead, and being open to them, sending a message that it’s too late to actually change anything around social justice, ethics, climate etc? Which in itself is giving up and helps maintain the status quo, and the current systems that are slowly destroying us?
Are the entwined climate and social justice protests really about winning, or showing resistance and not giving up, and going away quietly?
Is the G7 summit back in June, in Carbis Bay in Cornwall, an example of our leaders giving up, or not willing to change? Boris Johnson, the British Prime Minister, flew to Cornwall waving and celebrating as he arrived, walking down the steps of a jumbo jet. Couldn’t he have travelled in a greener way, and lead by example?
The Carbis Bay Hotel where the summit was held, had to expand to accommodate the delegates. Woodlands were cleared, and building happened without any planning consent. This seems like backhanders going on here."
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss, delve into, explore or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Today marks a big milestone for the podcast, it being the 200th episode. It's also happens to be the 74th anniversary of India's independence, which happened on the 15th August 1947 https://nationaltoday.com/indian-independence-day/ .
So listen in, as Stuart and William talk about, and expand on, the strange shared connection today between the milestone for the podcast, and the very significant event for the people of India. The stars are aligning today it seems, maybe?
ANNOUNCEMENT! The podcast format, for the first time, will be expanded and presented in front of a live face to face audience.
On the 25th September 2021, 4.30pm to 6.30pm, Stuart and William will be jointly hosting, with The Bothy Vineyard, the first ever live iteration of the podcast format.
You can book your tickets today, by following the link below. Apologies for listeners outside of the UK, as this will only be an exclusive in person event, not online, and won't be recorded, or have a 'listen again' option.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/166481327131
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their spontaneous, unscripted informal chat approach, hosts Stuart and William offer up a very real deliberation, as they explore a listener question, from listener Sally Ann Woodrow, from Oxfordshire, England.
"What's going to be the main factor in driving change, individuals making positive choices, government policy and technology? For example, electric cars that also filter out CO2?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
An unscripted real discussion, with genuine opinions, as hosts Stuart and William examine a listener question, again from Sally Ann Woodrow in Oxfordshire, England.
"Is there a healthy balance for humans to exist on this planet, or is the natural world better off without us?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Usually we aim to challenge mindsets, beliefs, habits through this podcast, however this episode goes off on a slightly different path than usual. So listen in as Stuart and William delve into, discuss, and explore a question sent in by listener, Sally Ann Woodrow, from Oxfordshire, England.
Here is Sally's question;
"It seems like a lot of your audience are regulars? Why then do you always stick to the same introduction format for your podcast? You always mention your ages, and not expand on other personal information so we can get to know you better through each episode. For example, William's a photographer, what does he like to photograph. Why does age matter?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their usual unscripted, roaming style of conversation, hosts Stuart and William delve into a listener question, from Hailey in Minchery Farm, Oxford, England.
"How do you deal with trolls on social media regarding the podcast and other work you do?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Here is a deep dive into a fascinating, and at times, brutal response, to a post Stuart and William posted in the 'environment' subreddit in April this year (2021).
In that initial post Stuart and William posed the following questions;
Loneliness within climate activism, is it an overlooked issue?
Any personal experiences about this potentially hidden issue within activism?
They received a reply almost straight away from WasabiGlum3462, and promised to record a bonus episode in direct response.
This bonus episode of the podcast released today, is Stuart and William's full analysis of WasabiGlum3462 feedback.
You can find the complete original post with the following link: https://www.reddit.com/r/environment/comments/n0bry3/loneliness_within_climate_activism_is_it_an/gw60rzv/?context=3
This is verbatim, Reddit user WasabiGlum3462 reply if you'd like to follow it as Stuart and William try and confront some of the issues raised;
"It is incredibly isolating. If you're doing it right, you're likely being vilified or out right criminalized by the communities surrounding the jobs you're threatening. Sustained volunteer work takes away from other, more lucrative opportunities, and if you're already impoverished there are some inherently alienating dynamics between the college proto-liberals who are patronizing you or spending only a weekend over the summer working with your lifelong struggle. Consistent harrassment by law enforcement sucks. If you're committed to jail or prison than that is obviously isolating. There was a lot of encouragement from other crusty activists, but there were so few of us. Ofc I was an autistic, suicidal basket case whoring, drinking, and smoking constantly and skirting a range of criminal activities and always had trouble attracting friends, so I'm sure i would have felt lonely regardless. Paranoia would undercut a lot of potential friendships, though i knew i could have easily seduced any undercover fbi agent to the resistance. Ex-mil private security a-holes had the misguided notion it was their duty to protect business and never miss an opportunity to lean on or threaten you. All said, there was a lot of solidarity and better, more organized folk who could manage the support and even if i only briefly met members of the wider network, i could feel them moving with me every step of the way. I think, as an American env. activists, most of the loneliness comes more from simply being an American, than any work associated with activism. To envoke a familiar allegory: When you settle into your barstool at the end of the day, after filtering out the cracked out lumber jacks who clear cut old growth, pipeline and oil riggers, the liberal appeasers, the conservative wingnuts, the backing banksters, and the fascist pigs, there are still many people remaining who will buy you a round. Its worse for high profile activists. Fame does strange things to your social life and self image. Worse, it limits the sort of actions you can take. I'm glad i could maintain healthy consumption of earthly vices without having to worry about disappointing members of the whole damn movement, get away with petty acts of vandalism against construction and survey equipment when under the radar, or say something stupid and offensive without some damned debate ensuing. Isolation is empowering. I'm sure every lonely person feels overlooked. Though the networks activists rely on are fickle and fragile and i hear a lot of reactionary talk calling activists, of any movement, "entitled" or "privileged", ignorant of the personal sacrifices made on behalf of our quiet mother. I only hope, with the rise of modern fascism, all the various protests and movements intersect and amplify environmentalism and real, mitigative actions can be made systematically before it's too too late."
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William, mark the International Day Of Friendship in this bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
First proclaimed in 2011 by the UN General Assembly, with the idea that friendship between peoples, countries, cultures and individuals, can inspire peace efforts and build bridges between communities.
The resolution places emphasis on involving young people, as our future leaders, in community activities, that include different cultures and promote international understanding and respect for diversity.
You can find out more by following this link; https://www.un.org/en/observances/friendship-day
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Hosts Stuart and William take another roaming and wandering, insightful conversation, offering up a very real discussion as usual, as they explore a listener question, from Jenny in Littlemore, Oxford, England.
"You talk about supporting each other on numerous episodes, what form does that take, and how do you know when each other needs supporting?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
It's time for another very real, unscripted discussion, that really could go anywhere, with hosts Stuart and William, as they embark on another exploration of a listener question, from Clive in Florence Park, Oxford, England.
"Are you scared about what humanity faces regarding the climate crisis?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their searching, improvised chatty style, hosts Stuart and William hope to challenge your thinking, as they explore and examine a straight forward question from listener Ted, in Elsfield, Oxfordshire, England.
"How do you feel about the cut flower industry?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
No filters, just a brutally honest conversation, between hosts Stuart and William, as they head off on another meandering, insightful conversation, scrutinising another listener question, from Alan in Northway, Oxford, England.
"Is the system rigged against the ordinary woman and man in the street? Maintaining the status quo, and the old boys network, with the balance skewed in favour of our leaders, policy makers, and those with vested interests?
The latest London mayoral elections is possible an example, in that it's too expensive for a member of the public to stand. I've heard that it costs £30,000 to even get on the ballot paper.
Black Lives Matter motivated a report by the UK government, that said there's no systemic racism. The report claims to have found well meaning protestors just see problems where there aren't any. So with this in mind, if the system and the government commissioned the report, isn't it always going to find the answer that suits the system, and the government?
Nothing is resolved until hard truths are faced."
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
We aim to challenge mindsets, beliefs, habits through this podcast, and this episode is no exception to that rule.
Join hosts Stuart and William, in their usual far reaching discussion style, as they examine a question from listener Sue in Stockport, Cheshire, England.
"Several studies suggest that the Covid-19 pandemic has had a positive influence on sustainable consumption. How can we strengthen a compassionate mindset and inner determination to keep the vision of a sustainable world alive, and not go back to business as usual?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Authentic views and maybe unexpected opinions, as hosts Stuart and William depart on another meandering, insightful conversation, offering up a very real discussion, as they explore a listener question, from Charlotte in Jersey, one of the Channel Island's.
"Is Joe Biden good for the environment?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their nomadic and roaming, unscripted style, hosts Stuart and William offer up a very real discussion, as they take a deep dive and explore another listener question, this time from Debs in Jericho, Oxford, England.
"Doom-mongering seems to have overtaken denial as a tactic of climate crisis deniers out there. Deniers know if we are taken down a road and believe nothing can be done, and it is too big a problem, then we give up and the status quo is maintained. Which is good for those with vested interests in the fossil fuel industry.
Do you agree that doom-mongering is a new tactic picked up by climate crisis deniers?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Another unscripted, searching, insightful chat, between hosts Stuart and William. A very real discussion, as they examine another question, from Alan, a listener in Northway, Oxford, England.
"Given the flammable conditions of societal and planetary collapse in a climate crisis, the divide and rule culture wars of Donald Trump in the USA, and Priti Patel in England, can never end well, ever, or can it?
Abuse of power to threaten peaceful protesters with 10 year jail sentences, when violent protesters getting only 10 years too, sends an inconsistent message, potentially.
Bringing in new legislation in the UK that says police have the power to arrest anyone who's protesting, (even those just making protest banners) who may cause inconvenience to anyone, puts the police in tough situation. They're the ones having to interpret the ambiguous term, 'inconvenience', set by the government.
This looks like the government inflaming an already volatile situation, and blaming the police if it goes arse over tit. Should the new policing act be revised again, with a new viewpoint of not seeing it as an us and them situation, but from all party point of view?
We all face the climate crisis and societal breakdown together".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Buckle up, this really could going anywhere!
Authentic views and opinions, as hosts Stuart and William depart on another meandering, insightful conversation, offering up a very real discussion, as they explore a listener question from Kai in Cold Harbour, Oxford, England.
"How do we recognize when we have a climate crisis denier in front of us?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Another spontaneous, improvised, insightful chat, between hosts Stuart and William. A very real deliberation, as they examine another listener question, this time from Barry in France.
"Are climate crisis deniers truly on the backfoot, or is this just another fake dawn? This new momentum in addressing the climate crisis feels different now, with the youth movement really taking off.
Is it time for positive optimism? Mind you the young left huge amounts of litter in parks after the third UK lockdown eased, so my (Barry's) optimism took a battering that day".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join hosts Stuart and William on another roaming, insightful conversation, offering up an authentic, unscripted discussion, as they explore a listener question, from Alan in Northway, Oxford, England.
"At recent protests, of all kinds, there have been members of the public given the task of being legal observers to ensure protests and policing of the protests are fair. I'm hearing the police are arresting these people and pushing them aggressively, whilst police dogs are barking at them. Is this designed to put off people taking this volunteering role and baring witness to wrongdoings, on both sides of the argument?
The police say they are merely trying to interpret government legislation, but is this just a distraction technique? Could it be that the police, the courts, the government, and the overall system are all separate entities, but one of the same thing even so? That being, a box of tools used to keep the public in their place. Are we really in a democracy?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join another meandering, unscripted, deep conversation, as hosts Stuart and William again delve into another listener question, from Colin in Worcester, England.
"It's said Britain is a pretend democracy, and is it a disguised dictatorship. Protesters are being treated badly, yet it's said that in Myanmar, the protesters there are being treated a lot worse, so we've no right to complain. Do you agree though that whatever country, culture, or experience, protest actions prevents and breaks silence, and the power that silence has in maintaining the status quo?
We need to get ourselves off fossil fuels, and change supply chains, and the way we consume. We have the funds and the resources to live in new sustainable ways. We have most of the tech already available to us to make this change, we just don't seem to have the will to do it. It will only change with people pressure.
Increasing biomass of mature trees, and kelp farms, that absorb carbon, alongside better transport infrastructure etc is doable. Reducing food wastage can have a big impact, as then less methane will be the result of less food wastage going into landfill. If we do that, we consume less, so we produce less plastic.
We have the intelligence to do this, but do our leaders?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join hosts Stuart and William, in their usual far reaching discussion style, as they examine a question from listener Cliff in Radley, Oxfordshire, England.
"I (Cliff) see climate crisis protesters arrested en masse, and taken by police to stations, in diesel vehicles. Protesters also travel to protests in gas guzzlers, and use tons of plastics during protests. Have protesters thought this through properly? Is it their problem, or the Police's problem regarding the transportation issue once arrested? Or is it all our problem?
TV Programs are now common and are being made all over the world, highlighting the climate crisis that is happening now. Yet presenters like David Attenborough are criticized for making these shows to make us aware of how bad things are, as they're flying all over the world to make these shows. Can flying, and having a large carbon footprint ever be justified?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their nomadic and roaming, unscripted conversational chat style, hosts Stuart and William offer up a very real discussion, as they take a deep dive and explore another listener question, this time from Tony in Newbury, Berkshire, England.
"Environmental campaigns seem to easily be dismissed as localised issues, and not national things, especially here in the UK, but this habit of governments increasingly suppressing protests is seen the world over. Most environmental campaigns are generally fighting the same issues, and as long as the public perception remains of these being local issues, it will always be a David and Goliath scenario.
Campaigners are often amateurs with few resources, with the government, developers etc, and their opponents having huge resources, well paid barristers, and a rigged system in their favour.
Politicians downplay the protesters as localised issues, and lazy suppressed and oppressed journalism, all serve to divide and conquer. It's a strategy used to keep the public under control. It's not in the politicians favour to forewarn communities what will be happening to them, by revealing it in the media what is already happening in other communities. When the truth creeps out is on social media, our leaders dismiss it as staged or misrepresentation, or one sided. It all seems like the George Orwell book 1984 to me.
Isn't it time that all small local campaigns pool their resources, knowledge and skills, becoming a stronger force, and more professional, and more resilient against repression our leaders already distribute?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Another unscripted, meandering, insightful chat, between hosts Stuart and William. A very real discussion, as they examine a listener question, from Cliff in Radley, Oxfordshire, England.
"Various protests are popping up to commemorate the mass trespass that happened back in the 1930s on Kinder Scout in the Peak District, in the north of England. People are being encouraged to reclaim our land and trespass on land marked private. Should people trespass at all, and is there ever an acceptable case for trespassing? And should these protestors go off and get themselves jobs so that they can buy their own bit of land, no matter how small? Plus are they going to then turn on their protests towards people's right to own their own homes?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
A meandering unscripted real discussion, and opinions, as hosts Stuart and William examine a listener question, from Cassie in Bicester, Oxfordshire, England.
"Low traffic neighbourhoods, do you think they are a good thing? What I'm noticing is they might be making some congestion hot spots even busier by closing these rat runs?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
RECORDED VIA LANDLINE PHONEJoin hosts Stuart and William on another roaming and nomadic, insightful conversation, offering up a very real, unscripted discussion, as they explore a listener question, from Philip in Harrogate, England.
"After the third lockdown in Britain was eased in late March 2021, parks were seen packed with those in their teens and early twenties, and then leaving loads of litter behind. Some say it's just young people enjoying themselves, and the council's fault for not supplying enough waste bins. In my opinion, it's easier to take home rubbish though, as it's lighter than when it was actually carried there, because all the produce has been consumed. If the next generation is truly more environmentally aware, why are they inflicting this disgrace on the rest of society? Maybe the council shouldn't tidy our rubbish away so efficiently in the future, so when these people return, as they will, they will see and feel the impact of their brain dead thoughtlessness?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question."
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to another unscripted wandering real discussion, bordering on a debate, similar to those that can be overheard in a bar between two men in their 40's. Stretch your thinking with hosts Stuart and William, as they explore a listener question, from Angela, Berwick Upon Tweed in England.
"Should anyone be allowed to hoard wealth, while so many go without basic necessities?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
RECORDED VIA LANDLINE PHONE Authentic views and opinions, in another wide ranging, unscripted, real discussion. As hosts Stuart and William, break down another listener question into bitesize, understandable chunks. This time, Jaryd from Ireland is back, with his second question.
"Who is the new enemy in the climate war? Deniers, fossil fuel industry and their advocates, politicians, and the media, have organised possibly the best funded PR campaign to discredit science around the climate crisis. They haven't given up, but have just evolved their tactics. Is Rupert Murdoch their new mouthpiece, rewriting history and the present, and is muddying the water an obstruction to progress?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to delve into, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question."
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their usual roaming, unscripted style of conversation, hosts Stuart and William delve into a listener question, from Sue in Stockport, England.
"We see lots of activists campaigning against things like climate change, inequality, the COVID 19 pandemic handling. You could call these extrovert activities, but what advantages do introverts have over the extroverts in the world today? Is it time to shift the emphasis from extrovert activity to more introverted activity and work together?
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their meandering, searching, unscripted conversational chat style, hosts Stuart and William hope to challenge your thinking, as they explore and examine another listener question, this time from Russel in Welshpool, Wales.
"If you could teach everyone in the world one concept, what concept would have the biggest positive impact on humanity?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In another meandering, unscripted conversation, bulging with authentic views and real opinions, hosts Stuart and William explore another listener question, this time from Julia in Kingston Bagpuize, Oxfordshire, England.
"Could you discuss our place in nature, and our moral status over other forms of life?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, examine or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join hosts Stuart and William, on another roaming and wandering, insightful conversation, offering up a very real discussion to stretch your thinking, as they delve into a listener question, from Michelle in New Hinksey, Oxford, England.
"Regarding the authorities responses to the ecological protests that have been happening. Is their response driven by a need to put off others from protesting, and is direct action the best approach for activists?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
It's time for another very real, unscripted discussion, that really could go anywhere, with hosts Stuart and William, as they embark on another exploration of a listener question, from Ivy in Worthing, East Sussex, England.
"Listening to your podcast regularly, I'm (Ivy) wondering do you really get on with activists and environmental campaigners yourselves?"
You never know, you might learn something new, or see things from a new perspective, simply by listening to this?
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join hosts Stuart and William on another meandering, insightful conversation, offering up a very real, unscripted discussion, as they explore a listener question, from Chantel in Iffley, Oxford, England.
"Can we bring about lasting sustainability by being nice to each other?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, delve into or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Another unscripted, meandering, insightful chat, between hosts Stuart and William. A very real discussion, as they examine a listener question, from Jesper in Denmark.
"If we step inside people's lives across the world, it makes them relatable, and real people. Do you think your aim of giving indigenous cultures a voice, through the podcast, will help with that?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, explore or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Authentic views and opinions, as hosts Stuart and William depart on another meandering, insightful conversation, offering up a very real discussion, as they explore a listener question, from Alberta in Germany.
"Being an environmental activist, can be a lonely existence. Could you guys explore the subject of human loneliness?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Authentic views, in another meandering and wandering conversation, from hosts Stuart and William, who examine a listener question, Bret in California, USA.
"Unequal societies seem to be the most unhappy. Here in California, it's obvious many lack purpose. Welfare in America (The US) means Americans don't get any money, support is lacking in turning people's lives around. Judgement and distancing go on now, compared with when I was a child, when it was more accepting. The poor are dismissed, it could happen to anyone. The rich don't want the poor, and the poor don't want the rich".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or delve into? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
It's time for another relaxing, and roaming conversation, with hosts Stuart and William, as they offer up a very real discussion, while exploring a listener question, from Rory in Darwin, Australia.
"I (Rory) heard your recent episode about food security. and the process of water seeping through soil. and into water courses. Are landfill sites then ticking timebombs. Whereby toxins leach into rivers. meaning there's less and less drinkable water. and in time we totally run out of drinkable water?"
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or explore? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join hosts Stuart and William on another roaming and wandering, insightful conversation, offering up a very real discussion, as they explore a listener question, from Gail in Headington, Oxford, England.
"Climate change and the rainforest destruction are intertwined. How can we truly hope to progress, when our world is on fire?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join another meandering, unscripted conversation, as hosts Stuart and William again delve into another listener question, from Nguyen, in Vietnam.
"I've heard you talk about the sensory walks you lead out in nature. Which of the main senses do you feel elicits the best response from people, if you want them to be motivated to start protecting nature?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their meandering, unscripted conversational chat style, hosts Stuart and William explore and examine a listener question, from Marc in Dudley, West Midlands, England.
"How important is mental health in the environmental and ecological fight we face?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their usual meandering, unscripted conversational style, hosts Stuart and William delve into a listener question, from Pauline in Farmoor, Oxfordshire, England.
"Why can't we have a mainstream day? We have World AIDS Day, International Women's Day, LGBTQ Day, Gay Pride Day, and various other environmental days. Why can't we have a Mainstream Day?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their meandering, unscripted conversational chat style, hosts Stuart and William offer up a very real discussion, as they explore a listener question, from Rich in Burnley, Lancashire, England.
"Is the message more powerful if it's positive when we talk about the multiple crisis we face, compared with negative messaging?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William wish you a Happy Easter 2021, wherever you are in the world.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or delve into? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Find out more about the wider project at: https://thepeoplescountryside.co.uk/
Support the project through Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In another meandering, unscripted conversation, bulging with authentic views and real opinions, hosts Stuart and William explore a listener question, from Chia-Ling, in Taiwan.
"How impactful and inspirational can individuals really be, in making positive things happen, where we live locally?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William preview tomorrow's release (30th March 2021), where they will be discussing, exploring, and examining a question sent in by listener Chia-Ling, from Taiwan.
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or explore? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Find out more about the wider project at: https://thepeoplescountryside.co.uk/
Support the project through Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Your hosts Stuart and William head off on another meandering, deep conversation, as they examine a listener question, from Jonati, in Israel.
"How can we make humanity excel again?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to delve into, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Join hosts Stuart and William, in their usual meandering discussion style, as they examine a question from listener Khalid, in Oman.
"I enjoyed your Covid series, when you shared your personal challenges, and the lessons you felt were there to be learned, and put towards the ecological crisis we face. Could you share your thoughts about the challenges you, and we, still face at this point? It might be useful for your listeners in getting us to think about how to set ourselves new challenges, as we take steps towards our collective unknown futures".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Honest opinions, using their meandering, unscripted conversational chat style, hosts Stuart and William explore and examine a listener question, from Raul from Peru.
"£8.50 in British currency, is the societal return for every £1 invested in volunteering in nature, by businesses. The return is mainly through wellbeing, so how can we encourage more people into wild working days, and getting businesses involved through team building, and other daily working practices?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Another meandering, unscripted, real discussion, and authentic opinions, as hosts Stuart and William, delve into a listener question, from Yvette, in Marston, Oxford, England.
"My view [Yvette's] is we need to prioritize relationships when building local and international links. I'd be intrigued to see where you go with this idea in your debates and conversations on this podcast. You always go off the beaten track in your discussions, and come up with some interesting and at times, pleasingly odd ideas, keep it up guys!".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Authentic views and opinions, in another wide ranging, unscripted, real discussion. As hosts Stuart and William, delve into a listener question, this time, from Aleksei in Russia.
"Food brings us together, culturally and practically. It offers a nutritional life, and a community life, helping the most vulnerable. It brings the haves and have nots together, with emotions wrapped up in food too. Is food security really a big benefit to combatting the ecological breakdown we face, when we already produce enough food to feed the entire planet? Or are our leaders, policy makers, and news media, in cahoots in selling us a different narrative? Instilling international fear in us about food shortages, and getting us fighting and waring. Is this all about divide and conquer?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to another unscripted meandering real discussion, bordering on a debate . Stretch your thinking with hosts Stuart and William, as they delve into a listener question, from Roisin from London, England.
"You [Stuart], were motivated to be an activist through anger in the early 1980s, do you see history repeating itself?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com with your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Authentic views, in another meandering conversation, from hosts Stuart and William, who examine a listener question, from Alvaro in Spain.
"The next step in human progress, is to live within the fabric of the nature and the environment that underpins us. Revealing that we're not an isolated species, away from nature. Do you agree, or do you think there is another step, or multiple steps to come first?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to delve into, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comwith your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
A meandering unscripted real discussion, and opinions, as hosts Stuart and William delve into a listener question, from Preben in Sweden.
"If we go to other planets to mine minerals, are we expanding the mistakes we're making on this planet, to other planets?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to examine, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comwith your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Using their meandering, unscripted conversational chat style, hosts Stuart and William explore and examine a listener question, from Pete in Islip, Oxfordshire, England.
"We have enough water on the planet for everybody, yet the amount that is uncontaminated and usable for drinking water, each year, gets smaller. I've heard by 2030, the demand for drinking water will exceed the amount of water available. We are likely to rely on chemicals to make the remaining water drinkable, but in time, with that logic, we'll be drinking more chemicals than water. How concerned are you about water resources, and what can be done to secure the quality of the water that remains?".
Do you have a question you'd like Stuart and William to explore, discuss or debate? Send us an email thepeoplescountryside@gmail.comwith your name, where you're listening from, and your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode, Stuart and William explore and examine a question, from listener Vandana in India, "Do you have any examples of people watering down their anti-environmentalist stance, when confronted with a real person, that they personally know, who has environmental activist views? It's hard to generalize all environmentalists as snowflakes, when we start to see people as human beings.".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Outside of the usual release schedule, here's some audio extracted from a teaser video, just released, detailing an exclusive, just for our Green Transformer tier over on our Patreon page. Your Co-hosts Stuart and William, will be talking about how they approach guests / collaborators for the podcast and other projects.
To hear/see the complete version of this exclusive material, become a Green Transformer today via the following link;
https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside
Find out more about the wider The People's Countryside project at: https://thepeoplescountryside.co.uk/
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore and examine a question from listener Ben in Islip, Oxfordshire, England, "Why are so many ready to consume and believe fake news? Covid vaccines have shown this. The BAME community seem to be at high risk of fatality from the virus, with high numbers of death rates, yet that community has a large volume of people not willing to take the vaccine as they say they already have their own tradition based on ginger and turmeric etc. If these treatments they work, why are so many of them dying? Others say the vaccine contains a government tracker, so they won't take it, and asked where they heard this information, they say on What's App. To me governments are already tracking us on devices called mobile phones ".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore and examine a question from listener Ivan in Suffolk, England, "Climate science to some is more about alarmist journalism than anything else, which I don't agree with. Those that scream about problems are the privileged few, and this doesn't help those on the ground, facing real hardship, which I don't necessarily agree with either. What I do think as the best option is that discussions are needed to be had now with inventors and entrepreneurs. Inventive minds working on revenue generation from carbon emission collection could help de-politicize climate change too.".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William delve into this second question from listener Ron in Cuddesdon, Oxfordshire, England, "Where does the confidence come from to change our lives, and live sustainably, when we know it'll be tough, and a huge transition?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Al in Limerick, Southern Ireland, "How can we normalize non-confrontational discussions, disagreements, and debates? Can we disagree nicely as you often say on the podcast? Does having differing views, always have to be approached abrasively, aggressively, and shouting louder than the person in front of you, that disagrees with you?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William examine a question from listener Ivy in Worthing, West Sussex, England, "Do you feel you over analyze questions you debate on the podcast? ".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore and examine a question from listener Jossie from Runcorn, Cheshire, England, "Environmentalists are snowflakes, true or false? Snowflake is a term commonly used to describe people who are offended easily, or repeatedly protest, amongst other things. Is snowflake an unfair label, especially for environmentalists? I see people who use the term about others, are actually a snowflake themselves, as they are the ones being offended. Maybe even hoping to maintain the power balance, and leave things unchanged, by smearing the characters of others? Meanwhile, those accused of being snowflakes, continue unbothered it seems. In this instance the snowflakes being environmentalists?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William delve into a question from listener Jack from Forest Hill, Oxfordshire, England, "Are we rearing a generation of young people, who are petrified about the future, by scarring them with open talk of the climate emergency, that I agree personally we are in?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore and examine a question from listener Maureen in Chalgrove, Oxfordshire, England, "People debate if inland wind turbines are nice or ugly. Is this a redundant argument when the aim behind this is that we're all trying to protect our beautiful planet, meaning wind power is part of the mix?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William examine a question from listener Rupert in Tring, Hertfordshire, England, "When it comes to arguing for human caused climate change, or against it, is it possible to base either viewpoint on facts, when much of what we face is still an unknown?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore and examine a question from listener James in Greater Leys, Oxford, England, "Is the use of celebrity a good thing for getting across the awareness of the ecological emergency we're in? People I know hate certain celebrities, and immediately switch off to anything or any campaign that these celebrities are engaged with. For example, Jamie Oliver campaigned to improve school meals. Some parents I know were happy for their kids to eat crap meals, if it meant they didn't have to agree with Jamie Oliver".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Keith in Little Milton, Oxfordshire, England, "David Attenborough was asked, what we could all do to help the environment? His answer was, not to waste anything. This is wise, alongside looking at carbon neutrality. Should no waste ideals start with us limiting our own waste thoughts though? ".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William delve into a question from listener Felicity in Honduras, Central America, "With food security and climate change, I think we should look at the big picture, but that seems to scare my friends, as it seems insurmountable on a world scale. What do you think?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Emily from Gothenburg, Sweden, "Centrism isn't exciting, but the extremes of an argument often are. You say the middle ground is where the agreement and understanding live, that lead to solutions in turn. How does the People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast makes centrism sexy? ".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Lauren from York, Yorkshire, England, "Is it realistic to expect those working in the oil industry to be redeployed into renewable energy?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Mick in Garsington, Oxfordshire, England, "It's discussed that we need to aim for net zero carbon emissions by 2050, whether that's quick enough for capturing carbon already emitted remains to be seen. I have to say if this transition happens to quickly it could cause volatility in the oil industry, and effect the world economy hugely on a global, and local basis. How can balance and measure be used in this necessary transition?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
A short New Year's message from Stuart and William of the People's Countryside team.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Reflecting back over the year we decided to treat you to a couple of re-releases.
In this second re-release, we have the best performing guest appeal of the year. Originally released on the 27th March, Jake Backus from Empathy Sustainability shares his suggestions on making the world a more sustainable place.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, we'd like to hear from you.
Do you have a question in the environmental arena that you'd like us to discuss on the podcast?
You can leave us a voice message via Anchor, email us your question to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com or contact us through Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. Just search for The Peoples Countryside.
Get your thinking caps on and send us your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
A short Christmas message from Stuart and William of the People's Countryside team.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William talk all things The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast. Who we are, and what we do.
Maybe you're a long time listener, or this could be the first time you've heard this podcast, Stuart and William also explain the future of the podcast, including it becoming a live show, in front of a live audience, online and on the stage, as Environmental Debate Live and Unscripted.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Reflecting back over the year, Stuart and William decided to treat you to a couple of re-releases.
Beginning with the best performing episode of 2020, here Stuart and William revisit a question sent in by listener Bartek in Abingdon, Oxfordshire, "Are electric cars really the future?".
Look out for the next re-release, on the 29th December, where we'll be revealing the most listened to appeal by a guest on the podcast. Which one will it be? Stop by to find out.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
William looks back to a classic past instalment of the podcast.
In this episode, we go back to the 31st May 2020, and a question sent in to us by listener Jaryd in Ireland, "What are our top 5 stupid moments making the podcast?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Roman from Slovakia, "I like your previous answer to my question about whether widening cycle lanes is another example of screwing over the motorists. My next question is, are the various types of road users prioritized through safety considerations? Considerations around certain groups removal from certain road environments, for whatever reason? Or considerations around limiting pollution emissions in certain areas? Or is it all of the above, or something else? ".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
William look's back to a classic past instalment of this podcast.
He looks back to this archive episode to see how points of view may have altered and evolved since the recording.
This time he revisits the debate with Andy Gunn of BBOWT. Originally released on the 7th January 2020, when the podcast explored the following three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate;
-
Should nature reserves be for people and wildlife or should they just be for wildlife?
-
The stereotype of environmentalists are hippies and people living unconventional lifestyles. Is this the reality? And how do we get more suits at the forefront?
-
How can we move on from the idea of everything being disposable?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Alice from Chiselhampton, Oxfordshire, England, "Does climate change truly divide us as a society and cause conflicts and armed conflicts? If so, why, and how?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Sandor from Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, England, "David Attenborough said recently our current economic system isn't good for the environment, and people consider this a huge issue. However, when environmentalists generally say the same things, they're accused of being Communists, Socialists, Marxists etc. Why is it more acceptable for David Attenborough to say this, and not the rest of us?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Frank from Shrivenham, Oxfordshire, England, "Can you talk about the donut economy?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Marcy from Shillingford, Oxfordshire, England, "Rishi Sunak has talked about a four day working week, what benefits would that have on the environment, families, and life as we know it?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Edith from Frome, Somerset, England, "Food insecurity is an issue, how do you see local growing initiatives filling that gap?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Ron in Cuddesdon, Oxfordshire, England, "The pub trade is nearly dead, due in part, to the Covid crisis! Should we be letting industries die, and move the workforce onto other areas? Or should we fund it, for what looks like a slow death? If at some point in the future pubs show potential, the void will be filled once again by entrepreneurs. These currently dying pubs could be converted into social housing. Much of this is similar to what could happen in the climate crisis, and our adaptation to it."
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Jake Backus from Empathy Sustainability appeals directly to you the listener in this call to action.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William attempt to tackle a tough question from listener Wayne in Rhyl, North Wales, "The abolition of slavery faced barriers from people with vested interests wanting it maintained. What can be learnt from this period history, and to put towards the climate and ecological emergency we now face?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William delve into a question sent in by listener Kenny from Pembrokeshire, "This year in the UK was saw temperatures reach 34°C for nearly a week, is this down to man made climate change?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Craig in Rutland, England, "How important are other people's opinions, and who should we listen to? In making this podcast Stuart and William are both opinionated, so, who do they both listen to? How important are other people's opinions to them both personally?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Pedro, ("I say Pedro" from Lisbon, Portugal), "The middle ground can be mediocre and beige, and may not be the best option! The middle ground between polarised views is often where you say answers can be found, in the common ground as it were. Can you help us define the 'best' options environmentally?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore this question from listener Sarah from Reading, "Uncertainty and risk, is it spoken about enough in environmental conversations?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore this question from listener Rory from Darwin, "We have a vicious cycle of blaming each other when it comes to the causes of the climate and ecological emergency. What are the first steps needed to break that cycle?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore this question from listener Deborah from Grantham , "Should anyone have their voice censored if their not conning people or committing fraud etc, and do conspiracy theorists offer a valid view across the opinion spectrum? Allowing us all the full information, to make educated and enlightened decisions. Or is equality of debate a destructive force?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore this question from listener Samantha from Elgin, "Is the true aim of environmentalists, really, to destroy and dismantle our modern ways of life?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Alex, from Poland, "HS2 protesters have been challenged that they want to reduce our collective carbon footprint, yet they are stopping the progress of electric trains and this project. Protesters are accused of wanting it both ways. Also, a new incinerator is planned for North London, protesters again challenge this, however, what else can be done with the rubbish going to these facilities? Protests highlight what's wrong, but often, don't offer clear solutions, or supported pathways".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Dawne, from Austria, "In London recently, protesters stood in shop windows, naked, with placards protesting about the fashion industry. Its unsustainable supply chains, and the abuse of low paid workers. Can a few undressed mannequins change the world economy, especially when it risks putting vulnerable people out of work, by influencing new buying habits? ".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Saj, from Kilburn, London. "Protests recently in London, by Extinction Rebellion, saw lots of artistic presentations, dancing, drums, flags, and vivid imagery etc. Is this protesting, or really just an excuse to block roads, with raves and parties?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Zack, from Botley, Oxford, "Are environmentalist's hypocrites, and blaming others for being locked in the same systems as everyone else?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Robert, from West Sussex, England, "For some people to listen to environmental protesters, they appear to want them to be purer than pure, living totally green lives. In essence, to be, as they suggest, hippies. Only then will they listen. The paradox is, if hippies are the messengers, then these same critics/observer's to often won't listen it seems. Due in part to the critics/observers not relating to or wanting to be perceived hippies. How do we solve this issue?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Alex from Poland, "Should media coverage be based on right or wrong, what the leaders agree with, or the betterment of life? Or something else?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Roman from Slovakia. Roman listens to the podcast via Anchor, and his question is "Widening of paths and cycle lanes after the Covid-19 lockdown. Is this just screwing over the motorist, again?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William explore a question from listener Rory from Darwin, Australia, "When it comes to environmental protesting, is there a justified use of fossil fuels?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this landmark 100th episode, Stuart and William explore a question from listener Saj from Kilburn, London. Saj listens to the podcast via PocketCasts, and his question is, "Some of the subjects that have been discussed on the podcast are polarising and divide opinion. Do you feel that gains or loses an audience?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode, Stuart and William discuss this question from Beth in Florida, "Are we optimistic business and the government will get behind the challenge we face to fend off the climate crisis?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William revisit this question from Bartek in Abingdon, Oxfordshire, "Are electric cars really the future?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode, Stuart and William explore this question from listener Alison from Faringdon, Oxfordshire, "How do we give environmental events happening around the world an "In My Backyard" feeling?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode, Stuart and William explore this question from listener Becky from Wembley, London, "Does science and environmentalism have a place in religion, and does religion have a place in science and environmentalism?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode, Stuart and William explore this question from listener Paul in Windsor, England, "Are current environmental narratives too much like a religion?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William explore this question from listener Lynn in Australia, "Is disability a barrier to having your voice heard in the climate emergency debate?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William explore this question from listener Sarah from Reading, England, "Gender inequality, what role does it play in environmental activism?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William explore this question from listener Pedro from Lisbon in Portugal, "Are our leaders/business's behaving like organised crime gangs?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, we'd like to hear from you.
Do you have a question in the environmental arena that you'd like us to discuss on the podcast?
You can leave us a voice message via Anchor, email us your question to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com or contact us through Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. Just search for the Peoples Countryside.
Get your thinking caps on and send us your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William explore this question from Bartek in Abingdon, Oxfordshire, "Are cars really the future?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William explore this question from listener Sally from Gloucestershire, "Is focusing on adaptation and resilience a distraction from reversing man's influence on the climate change cycle. A natural cycle that also influences Earth's core temperature".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William explore this question from listener Charlotte on Jersey, "We use a lot of combative and warlike rhetoric in the climate movement, is that wise?".
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William explore this question from Dave in Cheshire, England.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William talk about how you can listen to the podcast.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William reminisce about a classic past instalment of this podcast.
They look back to this archive episode to see how their point of view may have altered and evolved since the recording.
This time they revisit the debate they had with Chloe Dalglish. Originally released on the March 10th 2020, when they explored the following three tough environmental questions …
-
Does being part of a community have a positive effect on environmental understanding and how people deal with the climate, and environmental crisis?
-
Being informed about the world around you is an important step to understanding the impact we are having. However with so much fake news leading to people doubting what they read, how can the information be best presented to avoid being ignored as scare-mongering, or untrue?
-
How can podcast production be made more environmentally sustainable, and how can podcasters reduce their Carbon footprint?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William look back at a classic installment of the podcast.
They look back to this past episode to see how their point of view may have altered since the recording.
This time they look back on the chat they had with Elise Benjamin. Originally released on the 1st October 2019, we explored the following three tough environmental questions …
-
The original 1978 animated film of Richard Adams's Watership Down was seen as being too brutal for children to watch. With the 2018 version made for the BBC being a much more watered down version, should we really protect children this way or should children, as the original film intended, be made aware what impact we're having on the natural world around us by seeing it from the animal's point of viewer?
-
Should we be protecting the Green Belt from development?
-
Should we be suspicious when airports and oil companies take steps to be more environmentally sustainable, or is that just a green wash?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William reminisce about reaching the first anniversary of the podcast being on all major platforms, and what the future holds for it, and the live experiential stage version (Environmental Debate Live and Unscripted) that'll take the project as a whole on the road. Engaging a wider audience and making it more impactful.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this call to action episode Jake Backus from Empathy Sustainability appeals directly to you the listener.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William explore a question from Lasse from Northamptonshire, "Can you think of any ways the NHS can come out of the Covid-19 crisis and change its systems and processes so it can impact less on the environment?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William explore a question from Isabel from Northern Ireland, "What is a fair society?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William answer a question from Vandana in India, "Can we ever overcome Anthropocentrism, and what is our place in nature?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Prompted by a recent conversation William had with a friend. He and co-host Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt discuss the idea of whether the animals around us are good or bad, or is this just a human construct?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William discuss the future of the podcast, in particular the schedule for future episodes.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Each episode we will debate, with a guest, 3 tough world-scale environmental issues that challenge society and individual's currently held beliefs and perceptions https://thepeoplescountryside.co.uk/
Ultimately we want to take the podcast format in-front of a live audience in the form of Environmental Debate Live and Unscripted. With the addition of an experiential art installation and drama components.
This will enable the motivation and mobilization of the audience, toward practical actions to help with policy and behavioral changes needed for a more sustainable future, and a valued environment that we are part of and not separate from. New full episodes of the podcast are currently released at 10 am GMT, on Tuesday's and Sunday's.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
A debate around the easing of the lock down restrictions plus more, in this behind the scenes insight of the People's Countryside Environmental Debates podcast.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this call to action episode Paul & Rebecca from Whitewick's Abandoned Railways appeal directly to you the listener.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Once again William looks back at a classic installment of the podcast.
He listened back to this past episode to see how his point of view may have altered since the recording.
This time he's looking back on the chat we had with Dr. Alexandra Morel. Originally released on the 29th October 2019, we explored the following three tough environmental questions …
-
How would we be acting differently if we recognised nature as a separate/sovereign nation?" Not that we should necessarily, but I would be interested to explore how different or not society might be?
-
People are working behind the scenes on things like locking away carbon within algal blooms that sink and form rock, and also drilling into rock and storing it there within Limestone etc. Should we be focusing our efforts in these mitigation measures or the processes we as individuals are given to live and work by? Or both?
-
Is there such a creature as an urban animal?
There is a lot of humour in the room, and an openness to really delve deep into each individual question. All three of us make some good points a long the way that we feel stand the test of time.
We invite you to listen to this classic episode, and while you do so, we’d like to know how you would answer the questions we pose, and do you agree or not with what we said?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Once again William looks back at classic installments of the podcast.
He listened back to this past episode to see how his point of view maybe have altered since the recording.
This time he's looking back on the chat we had with writer Tom McCulloch. Originally released on the 3rd September 2019, we explored the following three tough environmental questions …
-
How can we best understand the relationship between the natural world and human technology and development?
-
What is the practice of the wild?
-
Is the world better off without us?
He chose this particular show as he wanted to listen again to how we answered the questions we each posed.
We invite you to enjoy this classic episode, and while you’re listening, we’d like you to think how you would have answered the questions we posed, and do you think we covered the topic and themes we discussed thoroughly? And would you like us to maybe return to one of these questions in the future?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, we'd like to hear from you.
Do you have a question in the environmental arena that you'd like us to discuss on the podcast?
You can leave us a voice message via Anchor, email us your question to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com or contact us through Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. Just search for the Peoples Countryside.
Get your thinking caps on and send us your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this second call to action episode Chloe Dalglish from Naturehood (Earthwatch) appeals directly to you the listener.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William answer a question from Barry from France, "We live in society according to logical, theological, and cultural norms and rules. Can we still claim that we have free will?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William answer a question from Calum in London, "I know things are still disrupted due to Covid-19, but do you have any guests lined up for when you do your full debate episodes?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this call to action episode Jake Backus from Empathy Sustainability appeals directly to you the listener.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William answer a question from Rory from Darwin in Australia, "Man's living closer to wildlife, which may have caused Covid-19 to jump from animals to humans, is that going to make use fearful and destroy animals as soon as we seen them? Or are we going to decide to back off to a healthy distance?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William answer a question from Drew in Glasgow, "What have we learnt about the subject of environmentalism since we started doing the podcast?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William answer a question from Simon in Devon, "If we were to start out making the podcast again, from scratch, what would we do differently?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
We explore a question from one of our listeners during this episode. This came from Jaryd in Ireland, "What are our top 5 stupid moments making the podcast?"
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this call to action episode Chloe Dalglish from Naturehood (Earthwatch) appeals directly to you the listener.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This is part 3 of a 3 part series where William looks back at classic installments of the podcast.
William listened back to this past episode to see how his point of view have maybe altered since the recording.
For this episode we’re travelling back to Christmas of last year (2019), and and a discussion about David Attenborough’s series, Seven Worlds, One Planet. This selected classic episode was originally released on the 26th December, Boxing Day (2019).
William chose this episode as it has been overall one of most listened to shows.
We talk about the potential impact of Attenborough's series, comparing it his previous Blue Planet program which had such a big effect on the public psyche.
We both felt at the time that we didn’t need to watch it to understand the impact we are all having on the natural world.
We invite you to enjoy this classic episode, and do you think we're right in not watching it? Let us know, we like to be challenged in our own assumptions.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This is part 2 of a 3 part series where William looks back at classic installments of the podcast.
William listened back to this past episode to see how his point of view have maybe altered since the recording.
The second in this mini series takes us back to March this year, and an episode that marked the last time Stuart and William recorded together in the same room. It has also been one of our best performing episodes in recent times, which is why William singled it out.
The episode we released on the 27th March 2020, however the more important date was when we recorded it, which was the 16th March 2020, a week before the UK went into full lock down due to the Corona Virus.
We invite you to enjoy this classic episode, and would particularly like to hear what you think about what we discussed, and how we can make sure we don’t get entrenched in our own opinions.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
This marks the dawn of a 3 part series where William looks back at classic installments of the podcast.
William listened back to this past episode to see how his point of view have maybe altered since the recording.
This first in this mini series takes us back to our very first edition of the podcast, which is why William singled it out. It's when we welcomed journalist Pete Hughes of the Oxford Mail, and originally released on this platform on the 21st July 2019.
We explored three tough environmental questions;
How much effect do humans have on other animals survival?
Are we causing more extinction than before? AND
Is human existence always at a cost to nature?
This was very much the starting point of this podcast's concept and format, and was originally recorded in 2018. This will in fact be the 3rd time this episode has been publicly released, as this podcast was originally only released through Soundcloud before we found Anchor. Who now host and distribute our material.
We were very much finding our feet with the format, though from the outset we were not afraid to tackle big questions.
It’s great to listen back to this episode as it shows the strength of the format. Also listening with fresh ears William picked up on different details, and also feels that his personal opinion has changed since then.
We invite you to enjoy this classic episode, and while you’re listening, we’d like you to think how you would have answered the questions we posed, and do you think we covered the topic and themes we discussed thoroughly enough? Would you like us to maybe return to one of these questions in the future?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Drop into a phone conversation with co-hosts Stuart and William, deliberating the immediate future of the People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, the recent surge in listens, and how you can support the podcast via Patreon.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William talk about how you can listen to the podcast.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Each episode we will debate, with a guest, 3 tough world-scale environmental issues that challenge society and individual's currently held beliefs.
Ultimately we want to take the podcast format in-front of a live audience in the form of Environmental Debate Live and Unscripted.
With the addition of experiential art installation and drama components. This will enable the mobilization of the motivated audience toward practical actions to help with policy and behavioral changes needed for a more sustainable future and a valued environment.
Our usual new full episodes of the podcast are released on a fortnightly basis, at 10 am GMT on Tuesday.
However throughout the Covid-19 situation we have and will be releasing three episodes a week on Tuesdays, Fridays and Sundays at 10am GMT.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 12 - Progress : Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 11 - Planning : Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 10 - Development : Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Discover what to expect on The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, we'd like to hear from you.
Do you have a question in the environmental arena that you'd like us to discuss on the podcast?
You can leave us a voice message via Anchor, email us your question to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com or contact us through Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. Just search for the Peoples Countryside.
Get your thinking caps on and send us your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 9 - Adaptation : Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 8 - Finding New Structure : Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 7 - Taking Stock : Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 6 - Shock : Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 5 - Fear : Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 4 - Disbelief : Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this call to action episode Paul & Rebecca from Whitewick's Abandoned Railways appeal directly to you the listener.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Paul & Rebecca from Whitewick's Abandoned Railways.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, are;
-
Should we rebuild old railways, or build HS2?
-
Getting more people using public transport, rather than driving, is an important step to reducing our individual carbon footprint. However, I wonder are we now too dependent on the car to ever change that habit?
-
Lowering the CO2 footprint and not aiming for a zero emissions is said to influence us to have a ‘business as usual’ attitude. What would life look and feel like if we lived in a way that produced zero carbon emissions?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 3 : Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
On behalf of all of us at the People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, we'd like to wish you a Happy Easter.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 2 : Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Part 1: Stuart and William share insights, tips and ideas on how they're adapting to the current situation, and give you the listener actions to occupy some of your time.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Stuart and William discuss which podcasts they enjoy listening to and recommend.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
The hosts talk about how you can listen to the podcast.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Discover what to expect on The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Recorded on the 16th March 2020, Stuart and William discuss the situation around Coronavirus and what it offers as far learning and adaptation insights for environmentalists and us all.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this call to action episode Jake Backus from Empathy Sustainability appeals directly to you the listener.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Jake Backus from Empathy Sustainability.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, are;
-
Is plastic bad, and should we find biodegradable alternatives?
-
Throw away culture has been in existence for 60+ years. Are we really able to change our ways, and create a more sustainable future?
-
F1 has declared its aim to be Carbon Neutral in all facets of its work, and really looking at the systems it operates by. How do we remove the Carbon we’ve already pumped out though, even if we do alter to become Carbon Neutral?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this second call to action episode Chloe Dalglish from Naturehood (Earthwatch) appeals directly to you the listener.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
What is Our Favourite Question from Previous Podcasts?.
Stuart and William discuss, talk about, delve, and explore.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this call to action episode Chloe Dalglish from Naturehood (Earthwatch) appeals directly to you the listener.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Chloë Dalglish from Naturehood (Earthwatch).
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, are;
-
Does being part of community have a positive effect on environmental understanding and how people deal with the climate, and environmental crisis?
-
Being informed about the world around you is an important step to understanding the impact we are having. However with so much fake news leading to people doubting what they read, how can the information be best presented to avoid being ignored as scare-mongering, or untrue?
-
How can podcast production be made more environmentally sustainable, and how can podcasters reduce their Carbon footprint?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Who have been our most memorable guests? William and Stuart delve and explore who they've enjoyed having as a guest on the podcast.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Upcoming guests! Stuart and William discuss the guests they have lined up for future TPC EDP episodes.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode Stuart and William discuss the progression of the podcast, the project as a whole and more.
These Up Close and Personal episodes give a behind the scenes insight of the People's Countryside Environmental Debates Podcast.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William pay a visit to the Eden Project in south west of England.
They talk about the history of the place, and why places like this need to be as accessible as possible, to everyone. They also touch upon the time that nobody had an accident.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William answer a question from listener Alex from Poland, "What are their biggest challenges personally and environmentally?"
A behind the scenes insight of the People's Countryside Environmental Debates podcast.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode listener Cyril from the Isle of Wight asked us to revisit the question relating to the avoidance of death and its impact on sustainability.
Stuart and William delve deeply into this question and explore it from a fresh perspective.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode, we welcomed Liam Shoesmith Head Gardener/ Dept Parks Manager for Truro City Council to the podcast.
The three questions, which lead us down some interesting avenues of debate, were;
-
If you were in charge of the country what would you concentrate on in regards to nature?
-
Our currency is seemingly focused on the upward curve of growth. Would it work if our currency was more focused on the downward curve of reducing carbon emissions? What would that look like in reality in the form of currency and on daily life, and would that realistically reverse mans impact on naturally occurring climate change?
-
There are still many people, including those who hold power, that refuse to either believe in climate change and that we as humans are the cause. Should we try to engage with them, change their minds? Or do we concentrate our efforts on helping those who do believe to make changes in their lives that will help the cause?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this bonus episode, Stuart and William answer a question from Audrey in East Sussex , were we performers as children?
Giving a behind the scenes insight of the People's Countryside Environmental Debates podcast.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode, we welcomed Andy Gunn from BBOWT to the podcast.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, are;
-
Should nature reserves be for people and wildlife or should they just be for wildlife?
-
The stereotype of environmentalists are hippies and people living unconventional lifestyles. Is this the reality? And how do we get more suits at the forefront?
-
How can we move on from the idea of everything being disposable?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Happy New Year! Here's a little intro to who we are, and what we do.
Welcome to a new episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast https://thepeoplescountryside.co.uk/
Each episode we will debate, with a guest, 3 tough world-scale environmental issues that challenge society and individual's currently held beliefs.
Ultimately we want to take the podcast format in-front of a live audience in the form of Environmental Debate Live and Unscripted.
With the addition of experiential art installation and drama components.
This will enable the mobilisation of the audience toward practical actions to help with policy and behavioural changes needed for a more sustainable future and a valued environment. New full episodes of the podcast are released on a fortnightly basis, at 10 am GMT on Tuesday.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to a new episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast https://thepeoplescountryside.co.uk/
Usually, in each episode, we debate, with a guest, 3 tough world-scale environmental issues that challenge society and individual's currently held beliefs.
In this bonus episode, we discuss a topical news item. This time, we discuss the David Attenborough programme "Seven Worlds, One Planet" and whether or not it will have the impact that the Blue Planet series had.
New full episodes of the podcast are released on a fortnightly basis, at 10 am GMT on Tuesday.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
A short Christmas message from Stuart and William of the People's Countryside team.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Shosh Shetty Head of Partnerships from Bagboard.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, were;
- Do people have the right tools to be able to make the right sustainable choices?
- How do we alter the system and process's we seem to be locked into, and what are the 'upstream' causes which prevent us having the 'downstream' effects we might strive for?
- If we can't sort Brexit out, what hope do we have of turning around climate change?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to a new episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast https://thepeoplescountryside.co.uk/
Each episode we will debate, with a guest, 3 tough world-scale environmental issues that challenge society and individual's currently held beliefs.
Ultimately we want to take the podcast format in-front of a live audience in the form of Environmental Debate Live and Unscripted.
With the addition of experiential art installation and drama components. This will enable the mobilisation of the audience toward practical actions to help with policy and behavioural changes needed for a more sustainable future and a valued environment.
New full episodes of the podcast are released on a fortnightly basis, at 10 am GMT on Tuesday.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Oxford University scientist Anthony Brown.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, are:
- Should we celebrate our environmental successes more and what are they?
- Mass consumerism is a big driver of climate change, what are the practical steps we can all take to consume less? Where can we all start with this issue?
-With music festival season starting, what measures are festivals already taking to limit their environmental impact and what more can be done?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast, we'd like to hear from you.
Do you have a question in the environmental arena that you'd like us to discuss on the podcast?
You can leave us a voice message via Anchor, email us your question to thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com or contact us through facebook, twitter or Instagram. Just search for the Peoples Countryside.
Get your thinking caps on and send us your question.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Trio Watson from Clear Space for Me.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, are;
- Awareness is a critical first step towards successful conservation of any species. Is this true for only the scientists and decision makers, or is it also relevant for the public as a whole?
- Adapting is a key to success, so why in the west does it appear we don’t want to adapt to survive?
- Since decluttering is essentially an opportunity to catch up on personal decision-making we haven't got around to, how can we practically apply permaculture principles to those everyday decisions?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
Welcome to a bonus episode of The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast https://thepeoplescountryside.co.uk/
In this first episode of Up Close and Personal hosts, William and Stuart talk about what they've learnt from each as the result of their continuing collaboration, and what challenges they've faced creating the podcast.
Up Close and Personal are bonus episodes, with new episodes of the full podcast being released on a fortnightly basis, at 10 am GMT on Tuesday.
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Julie Macken Deputy Queen Bee of Neve's Bees.
We had three big questions in this episode which lead to an interesting discussion, they were;
-
Society seems more opinion and personality focused, and not necessarily based in fact. What are the pro’s and con’s of that for the environment?
-
Having family overseas in Finland, I have to fly to and from the country on at a least yearly basis, drastically increasing my carbon footprint. Are there effective ways of combating this other than just not flying?
-
It seems like everyday there’s a new threat to our planet - running out of water in 25 years, melting of the icecaps in 20 years, losing our pollinators increasingly, irrevocable rise in temperature in 12 years. David Attenborough’s Blue Planet seems to have made a monumental change in attitude towards plastic. What might be the initiative to impact on these other threats?”
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Oxford University scientist, Dr Alexandra Moral.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, are;
-
How would we be acting differently if we recognised nature as a separate/sovereign nation?" Not that we should necessarily, but I would be interested to explore how different or not society might be?
-
People are working behind the scenes on things like locking away carbon within algal blooms that sink and form rock, and also drilling into rock and storing it there within Limestone etc. Should we be focusing our efforts in these mitigation measures or the processes we as individuals are given to live and work by? Or both?
-
Is there such a creature as an urban animal?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Oxford University scientist Dr. Imma Oliveras.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, are;
-
The more humans work together, collaborate, and judging by history, it could easily lead to being an even more dominant species, what steps can we take to avoid this?
-
Are the arguments for or against global warming a distraction? Should we be focusing more on living in a better, ethical and sustainable way? Who should be charged with setting the targets, standards and policies we should be aiming to live by?
-
What is the value of nature?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed former Green party councillor, ex-Lord Mayor, and campaigner Elise Benjamin.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, were;
-
The original 1978 animated film of Richard Adams's Watership Down was seen as being too brutal for children to watch. With the 2018 version made for the BBC being a much more watered down version, should we really protect children this way or should children, as the original film intended, be made aware what impact we're having on the natural world around us by seeing it from the animal's point of viewer?
-
Should we be protecting the Green Belt from development?
-
Should we be suspicious when airports and oil companies take steps to be more environmentally sustainable, or is that just a green wash?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Thalia Carr as our guest.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, were;
-
What are the challenges that people face who work professionally in the environmental/ sustainability sectors?
-
With all the evidence that climate change is the result of human activity, what will it take to convince those skeptics that we must act before it's too late?
-
Is any culture truly connected to its environment or is sustainability too rooted in necessity?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed writer Tom McCulloch.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, were;
-
How can we best understand the relationship between the natural world and human technology and development?
-
What is the practice of the wild?
-
Is the world better off without us?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Tom Carman from Cultivate, Real Farming Trust and Ethex.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, were;
-
What would our land look like if our diets were sustainable for the planet? Plus what 'nudges' could we use to get Real Farming the predominant form of farming in the UK?
-
In the western world we hide away from the concept of death and our owr mortality. Some of the ancient tribes that still exist are more connected to their mortality and live more sustainably. How much of a role does a westerners avoidance of death play in the way we farm, produce and consume?
-
Does being able to identify and understand the nature around us give us a stronger connection and make us more likely to want to protect it?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed David Mulholland, a landscape consultant from Oxford.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, were;
-
We are where we are because of all the thoughts we’ve ever had. Many say people won't make behavioral changes to allow humanity to live sustainably, unless its also financially beneficial to do so as well. Is this true? Do we not make a change because we think its to big? Resistance to create a better environment, does that emanate from us, or others?
-
Why do we litter so much? And what exactly is litter?
-
What are the ecological impacts of airports?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Martin Gibson from Earthly Gains.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, were;
-
How aware are we of our carbon footprint and what impact it has on the world?
-
Those that complain and criticize about the impact man is having on the environment, lack the ability and knowledge to create an alternative. Is this true?
-
How does diversity affect us?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message
In this episode we welcomed Pete Hughes from The Oxford Mail.
The three questions, which once again inspired an interesting debate, were;
-
How much effect do humans have on other animal's survival? Are we causing more extinction than before?
-
Is human existence always at a cost to nature and is talking about how bad the state of nature is really making a difference?
-
Is eating animals bad for the environment?
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message