https://theturfzone.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Ep1-Becky-Bowling.wavJulie Holt (00:00.204)
Welcome to the turf zone. In this relaunch episode, we’re talking to Dr. Becky Bowling, assistant professor and extension specialist in turf grass science and management at the University of Tennessee. Dr. Bowling, thank you so much for joining me today. Thank you for having me, Julie. It’s good to be here with you. This is a conversation I’ve been looking forward to for quite a while. Not too long ago, I started hearing about a new event at the University of Tennessee and
Just to lay some groundwork as a Turfgrass Association Management Magazine Editor, see events come across my desk left and right, and we have seen so many field days and so many different opportunities for Turfgrass managers to have some social time and some education time. This one caught my attention. So I wanted to talk to you about it because you and I have been working together to promote it to Tennessee Turfgrass professionals.
So would you mind introducing that event and telling me a little bit about it? Absolutely. Yeah. So, you know, shortly after I started a little over a year ago, our team had a conversation about what an in -person event was going to look like. This will be our first real major event that we’ve had since COVID that’s open to the entire Turfgrass public. And I think…
you know, what we really wanted to try to do is have something that was unique and that hit on a few core things. Like we really wanted to get into a couple of things, which was how do we support really good networking and connection with members of our industry that want to engage at a higher level with our students that want to engage in a higher level with our research program? And similarly, how can we kind of use that to address a growing workforce and labor shortage?
issue across the industry and how can we also use that to provide a unique opportunity for our students. So really wanting to develop an event that was going to be novel.
Julie Holt (02:01.246)
maybe a little bit different and really focused on, I would say just a richer experience and deeper level of engagement. And so we came up with Beacon and the name Beacon, which I’ve gotten a lot of questions about, came from one of our PhD students, Ben Pritchard, who was looking at the UT alma mater and there’s a line in there, know, hallowed hill in Tennessee, like Beacon shining bright.
That’s right. On a hallowed hill in Tennessee, like Beacon Shining Bright. And I think we all just thought that that was really neat. Kind of the idea that our UT TERF program could kind of be this beacon on the hill, bring a lot of folks from our industry together. And so we decided that we would have this be a two -day event. The first day is going to be really kind of like a career fair. That’s the easiest way to describe it. But our goal is that we want to bring together students and we want to bring together members of the industry that
have open positions or soon to be open positions, whether those are jobs or internships. And we really wanted to extend it beyond our UT turf grass program. We have a phenomenal program with great undergraduates, but there’s a lot of other really good programs in the region, including several at some smaller colleges and universities. And so we’ve extended invitations to at least seven other smaller schools to try to encourage them to bring students to this event. And so we’re really looking forward to seeing.
who we might get from some of those other programs. And the way that we’ll have it set up is that our prospective employers can purchase space in where we’ve rented out a ballroom at the Crowne Plaza and they can set up tables. And we also have have it to where they can set up kind of like a front lawn, quote unquote, where they can set up games and other interactive activities to engage those students.
And we’re really hoping that they can just have some really productive discussions. And we also intend for there to be a reception at the end of that on that first day where we play trivia and have some drinks and hors d ‘oeuvres and everybody just gets an opportunity to really get to know one another. And to go with that, we also intend to set up a digital space. So it’ll be effectively a website where we’ll showcase some of these opportunities in advance. So students will get to see before they come what some of those opportunities are going to look like that they’ll get to talk to.
Julie Holt (04:15.722)
employers or prospective employers about. So that’s the first day. And then the second day, that’s where we’ll have folks out to our research farm. It won’t be quite like a traditional field day. What we’ve really decided to do are these kind of themed tours. So we’ll have golf -centric tour, where Dr. Brosnan, Dr. Horvath, Dr. Strachan, myself, we’ll talk about all things golf -related.
And then we’ll have a more sports turf -centric tour. So that’s where a lot of folks will be able to hear about the World Cup research that’s ongoing here at UT, as well as several other things that Dr. Sorakhin’s program in particular is very involved in, in the sports turf world. And then we’ll kind of wrap up that day. We’ve asked our specialty crops specialist here, Dr. Mitchell Richmond, to talk a little bit about his hops research program.
And really that’s just going to be a great excuse to talk about our relationship or UT’s relationship with Yee -Haw Brewing and have a little, have a little beer maybe before the event closes out. And that weekend works out really well. We’ll have Ag Day here on the UT campus on Saturday for alumni that want to engage with the Ag school. And then there’ll be a football game that night if folks want to stay in Tailgate and do football. Wow. Okay. You’ve covered the entire gamut.
I’ve got to take it a day at a time and ask the idea of bringing employers and potential employees together. imagine that the employers are more the buyers market if we’re kind of comparative to real estate terms, but they’re the ones who are really eager to find good candidates for those positions. they involved in the idea process of this event?
I would say yes to an extent. So I think that our motivation to try to bring employers and students together came from just listening to folks at our TTA board meetings, at our annual conference, and hearing more and more about some of the difficulties that a lot of our turf grass managers are having in finding potential employees. And so in that sense, yes. And then we did have a couple of conversations with a few of our alumni that are really involved in the industry to get
Julie Holt (06:32.002)
get some of their input as well on what that might look like. And so, yes, I would say we did have some, engagement with, those folks as we kind of thought through all of that. So I’m thinking of a lot of, don’t, I don’t want to say, say old school, but, but traditional ways of finding staff for Turkress management, whether I mean, it’s golf course industry right down to, to link here. I still see some of these like job boards.
line association websites. And I see some of those jobs listed for a long, long time. Are those, are those employers open -minded to a new format of looking for staff? Are they, are they coming? Are they involved? Are they like, yeah, we’re going to maybe add to the, the old school way we’ve, we’ve pitched these jobs.
That’s a great question. You know, I think it’s too early for us to say. I think this is our first time doing this event here. Certainly so far, the feedback that we’ve gotten is a lot of excitement. You know, I think historically in the past, this is really what a lot of field days were about. It was really about trying to facilitate that rich engagement and trying to get our students connected with those in the industry. And so we’re kind of coming back to that. think, you know, not that we’ve had a complete departure from that, but field days have in many
places have become just so big and so focused on pesticide points and education, trying to get so many things kind of crammed into that day. And so this will be a little, a little different. And I think it’ll just be a learning year for everybody to see how, that goes and how people feel about it. You know, what I can certainly say is we have a generation now that’s coming out of these programs that may look for jobs and think about jobs differently.
You know, there’s research that’s been done kind of looking at what is appealing to some of these younger prospective employees going out into the job market. And I think what they’re looking for is a little bit different. And because it’s so competitive and there’s so many opportunities, I think really trying to create opportunities for one -on -one engagement where you can really get to know a student and that student can get to know you is going to make a lot of difference in terms of what’s appealing.
Julie Holt (08:53.528)
to some of these students, whether they’re looking for internships or looking for, you know, to start their career. Right. I have been working with younger employees and I sometimes feel really lost. Like, how do I entice younger generations to want to work and how do I adjust my attitude about the expectation of how they work? And I love that you are.
fostering a conversation before that starts in a way that they can get to know each other and figure out if they can bridge that gap of how we have worked and how they want to work. Do you have a lot of current students that plan to attend, like are your turf grass students right now all in?
Yeah, I think we have several students here that are really excited. We have a very, we have a good sized, very tight knit program. And you know, Dr. Sorokin and Horvath, who are the primary faculty that engage with our students have really good working relationships with them. And my intention too, is that we were going to promote this pretty heavily in the college, especially once we once the fall semester kicks off and we’re back in August, because
We have lot of other departments in our college where I think we have students that maybe don’t know what’s possible in the turf world. have students in agricultural leadership and education and communication. We have students that are in agricultural economics, students that are in adjacent fields that may love a career in turf. And I think too, the other thing we’ve heard from folks is we have several companies that have other positions that aren’t just turf management positions that they’re struggling to fill.
or hoping to get good candidates to look at. And so, yes, we have turf students here that are looking forward to it, that will be there. I’m hopeful that we have a lot of other students from the college as well and that we get some good diversity there. Excellent. Okay, let’s talk after Beacon. I know that you’ve now had a full year to absorb the Go Big Orange culture.
Julie Holt (11:03.598)
I think this is a really exciting time to join the UT family because we’re doing well on multiple sports fronts and there’s just a lot of excitement around that and we had a lot of activity here even just on the Ag campus but across the entire campus with new construction, new facilities, updated facilities and so you can kind of feel that excitement in the air and that positive momentum that this is a university that’s on the rise.
and that’s very successful and is continuing to move that way. So what’s next? What’s big in the future of the turfgrass science program at UT? Well, once we live through the pioneering beacon event, of course. There’s just so many things that are going on with our program right now as a whole. I mean, I would say, of course, there’s a lot of anticipation and excitement around the FIFA World Cup research that’s ongoing here.
As we get closer to 2025, 2026, and we have club world cup and then the big show, you know, there’s a lot of anticipation building up around that. And a lot of energy from our program, Dr. Srockin’s team in particular, going into preparing for that. In addition to that, you know, our program is very fortunate that we have great, great relationships across the industry. And we’ve got some neat research. Dr. Brosnan has got a lot going on right now in the golf sector and similar with Dr. Horvath. So there’s.
There’s a lot happening. I think as a team, we’ll have a retreat here in the next couple of years where we will be able to work together and really discuss kind of what does our vision look like going forward as a group. And so I’m excited for that. And then personally, for my own research, there’s a couple of big things that I’m trying to focus on right now. So the first is looking at doing some research over the winter months this coming year.
really focused more on golf courses, looking at wedding agent program development to try to protect sensitive areas from winter injury. We’ve had a lot of that in Tennessee over the last couple of years. And then going into 2025, a big focal point of my program is going to be to develop an extension program around community turf. So recognizing that we have many turf grass facilities across the state of Tennessee that are
Julie Holt (13:23.65)
public park spaces, school grounds, cemeteries, areas that can really be thought of as community assets and valued green spaces and really trying to think about how can we streamline education and professional support and to the folks that are managing those spaces. That’s a great topic. I hear that.
in and around the schools in my community. We often see our assistant principals mowing the middle school football field and you know we have a lot a lot of that space where volunteers want to do a good job and they want to have a nice safe playing surface or a place that the community can enjoy an outdoor movie night. I feel like most of them don’t know where to start and
I think that’s a great, great opportunity for extension. I see it out of my office window right this moment with a little community green space. So that’s amazing. I’ll look forward to seeing what comes from that. Yeah, I’m excited. And it gives us a really good opportunity to to kind of leverage our really extensive network of county extension offices. know, we UT has a county office in every one of our 95 counties. And so working with those agents and kind of
thinking about what we can do at a local level to support those community turf spaces. I’m excited about it. Have you had an opportunity to visit many of those 95 counties just yet? You know, somebody just asked me this question yesterday. I think that I’ve been to between 35 and 40 counties so far since I started here at UT. That’s impressive. And traveling the state of Tennessee is, you know, they’re not all day trips. They’re just not. I, and I really, I
When I started here, somebody, I didn’t know a whole lot about the state of Tennessee and somebody shared with me about the three regions and how distinct they are and they all have their own unique identity. And it’s been really neat as I’ve traveled to really see that play out in a very true way. And I’ve been able to form my own unique kind of relationships with each region. I’ve, I’ve got, you know.
Julie Holt (15:29.11)
restaurants I love in each region, places I like to stop and stay in each region. And so it’s been really cool, you know, and you’re right. Like when I go out to West Tennessee, that’s usually a two or three day trip with a hotel and all of that. West Tennessee is where we have the majority of our sod production in the state, know, a very strong presence of sod production. So that’s when I go out there, I get to spend a lot of time with our sod producers, which is actually really cool. It’s one of my favorite.
Christina Curdy is known for his West Tennessee hospitality. He’s a great tour guide and host over there in Rutherford and Gibson County. Yeah, I just really enjoy that. I enjoy going out there and visiting with a lot of those folks. It is very different, than middle and East. They are each very unique for each other. for sure. Is there anything else going on kind of related to that industry building and labor?
challenges. Sure. So a couple of different things that we could add to that. The first is I actually just spent before you and I got on here today, probably about an hour and a half, I have the honor of chairing our TTA education committee. So I spent about an hour and a half today. I’m just sending some emails out to folks planning what that program is going to look like. And so we will have, I believe our SOD producers intend to have
a portion of their session dedicated to talking a little bit about labor, maybe talking specifically about H2A labor. Our intention to right now on the UT extension side is we’re looking at, so there’s a professor here, Dr. Margarita Valandia, who is in our A -Rec department, Ag Economics department. She has developed some great resources for H2A labor and trying to work with her to finalize some H2B resources, really busy time, we’re
slowly moving them forward. So, you we do have some professional landscapers, golf or superintendents or golf courses, I should say, that are utilizing that program as an additional labor source. So we’ve got that going on. And sometimes I run into when I’m researching articles, I’m looking for good economic research of, who’s working and who needs more people who having numbers on the labor challenges.
Julie Holt (17:52.078)
It’s been really tricky and it seems all anecdotal, but it adds up to a full picture of most of our golf courses just don’t have enough staff and our LCOs are all working 25 hours a day. Do you guys have a way that you quantify that or like, can you see good data and numbers for that?
There was a really great and very thorough economic study that was done, I want to say about 10 years ago, that’s been published for the state of Tennessee for the golf or the turf grass industry. But since that was conducted, I don’t know, you know, those types of studies are, are, they’re, are challenging to complete and they require very focused bandwidth and willingness from, people to respond and participate. so,
You know, I don’t know that we have anything super recent to try to capture that specific to Tennessee. It would be interesting to see whether GCSAA, whether they’ve done anything along those lines. I’m not sure whether they have or not, but, you know, certainly some of the labor challenges are not unique to our state. So, so that’s a really good question, but I don’t, I don’t, we haven’t done anything here in a while that I’m aware of.
that don’t know what’s being done by some of those other entities. That’s a big puzzle to try to put together for sure. Okay, let’s close with what would be your best case scenario coming out of this first big event, the inaugural Beacon event? What would be really succeeded and this is why we do this and let’s do it again result from your Beacon event in September. I think for us,
For this event in particular, success would look like good student engagement, success in at least some of our employers that come through have promising leads, if not commitments to have students join them for internships or, you know, continue discussions about job opportunities. I think we really want to see that.
Julie Holt (20:04.312)
There’s some tangible evidence that those relationships have been formed and everybody leaves feeling like they’ve made new professional connections and it’s going to strengthen, you know, overall experience as professionals in the industry. Well said. And that’s a great goal. Dr. Bowling, thank you so much again for joining me and I wish you so much success for this event and for all your big plans coming up.
For our listeners, be sure to subscribe on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also follow us on X at the turf zone.
The post The TurfZone Podcast: Dr. Becky Bowling on Industry Recruiting and UT’s First Beacon Event appeared first on The Turf Zone.
ATA TURF TIMES: J. Scott McElroy, PhD – Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences Auburn University
As a scientist, I hesitate to make predictions such as those a fortune teller might reveal. I wince when I hear people speaking with absolute certainty that this or that will happen in the future. That some team will win, some politician will lose, or that some event will occur is often pure speculation. Absolute predictions are nonsensical, and an affront to probabilistic thinking. To think probabilistically is to think in terms of the percentage of probability that something will occur. This is the foundation of good science.
Having said that, it is highly probable that in the next 10 years autonomous technology will gain a significant portion of the professional and consumer market in the United States. I base this prediction on four pieces of evidence:
Robotic technology has already captured a significant portion of the technology in Europe.
All major brands that market traditional mowing technology or mowing equipment are developing robotic technology.
At one count there were over 40 additional startups and companies developing all manner of robotic technology, including mowers, painters, and sprayers.
The labor shortage will be sustained into the foreseeable future and could potentially increase (https://www.wsj.com/articles/america-still-has-a-worker-shortage-d0c65166).
But here I am addressing the “Contrarian’s Guide to Turfgrass Robotic Technology.” To the robotic contrarian, any positive arguments I present regarding this technology will likely fall on deaf ears. To the contrarian, only seeing is believing. Once my prediction has come true, the contrarian will adopt the technology as self-evident. Don’t get me wrong. Skepticism is a good thing. However, a complete understanding and realistic expectation of what robotic technology can do and where the technology is going is necessary to the healthy skeptic. I want to convince the contrarian that instead of waiting for the technology to be tested by fellow industry partners, they should begin testing and evaluating it themselves. With that in mind, I present this article to the contrarian on fundamentals of robotic technology today.
“The Technology is Just Not There Yet.”
This is the contrarian’s favorite phrase. In frustration I respond, “Where is There?” or even “What is There?”. If the technology has not arrived at the point where it can be adopted, what are its current limitations?
What irks me so much about this critique is the underlying assumptions about imagined technological characteristics that may not even be possible. The contrarian’s perception of automation is that the technology can be easily set up with little or no planning or understanding of the technology. That it may be deployed for use with little, or no, oversight. The phrase, “The Technology is Just Not There Yet,” is normally rooted in some technological advancement in artificial intelligence, or machine learning, that the contrarian has developed based on their perception of technological development, or maybe even a touch of science fiction.
My response is “The technology is what the technology is.” 2022 might as well have been ten years ago when it comes to robotic and autonomous technology in the United States. 2023 saw an incredible number of major advances. These include allowance for extended range connection to 4G and network RTK systems; daisy chaining of reference station signals for greater lengths; creation of virtual zones that can vary in direction, speed, and height of cut; and mobile deployment across multiple sites. The technology launched in 2023 will be the basis of robotic technology for the next five to ten years.
To the contrarian, if you were talking about 2022, I agree. The technology was not “there” for the professional user. It was largely restricted to wire boundary units, mowing randomly at a single fixed zone height. But 2023 completely changed the game.
Autonomous vs. Semi-Autonomous
Before discussing the technology that now makes robotic automation possible, let me make a rather large distinction in technology – Autonomous vs. Semi-Autonomous Technology. Now and in the future, it will be extremely difficult for any mowers with traditional mowing implements to be fully autonomous simply due to liability. As I have been told (I am not an expert on liability, nor am I a lawyer) liability has been and will continue to restrict deployment of certain technology. Such technology – semi-autonomous technology – will require an operator to be watching it while it is completing its task. It will not work at night and will likely not have a fixed position point for deployment. It will need to be taken to the location by hand for deployment. Fully autonomous technology will likely be small, lightweight equipment weighing approximately less than 300 lbs. Again, I may be wrong, but making traditional mowing equipment fully autonomous is going to be challenging to say the least.
Robot Positioning – The Leap Forward in 2023
The technology that made 2023 the year of advancement largely dealt with how the robots position themselves in space. And the one acronym you need to know is RTK.
RTK. RTK stands for Real-Time Kinematic. It is a satellite navigation technique used for enhancing the precision of position data obtained from global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) like GPS (Global Positioning System). RTK is commonly used in applications where high accuracy location information is required, such as surveying, agriculture, construction, and autonomous vehicles. RTK requires a base station in a fixed position that can then communicate to a rover (in our case a mower, painter, or range picker). RTK allows for real time positioning and correction for the rover. RTK signals can stretch from 200 meters to 10 miles depending on the signal type. Husqvarna and Echo Robotics use a fixed position RTK signal that extends 200–300 meters. (Actually, Echo Robotics now has 4G RTK which extends up to 10 miles.)
nRTK. nRTK stands for network real-time kinematics. nRTK is a mesh network system individual companies deploy and then offer other companies for use. For example, NexMow uses nRTK from TopCon (https://global.topcon.com/). Kress (https://www.kress.com/en-us/all-robot-lawn-mowers/) has developed its own nRTK system specifically for its mower technology. Tiny Mobile Robots also uses an nRTK system
for positioning.
RTK, whether a dedicated local RTK reference station, or a nRTK system, allows for positioning of technology in space, allowing for removal of wire from the field and the creation of virtual boundary systems. RTK also allows for directional or systematic work, not random work. With RTK the efficiency of the equipment increases exponentially and the ability to deploy over a wider area has increased.
Where Should the Contrarian Begin?
If it is true that robotic technology will be a common form of turfgrass management in the next five to 10 years, one probably needs to start learning about and adapting the technology now. To be fair, there are some early adopters that have made significant investments in this technology, but the contrarian samples the product before a full commitment. The key to what to utilize first is choosing equipment that solves a problem. Depending on the operation, you already have mowing equipment, so unless you need to make a major purchase, the first goal is to seek out equipment that solves a problem. Here is my list of useful equipment that solves major issues.
Field Painters. Field Painters have been adopted in the United States faster than any other autonomous technology for one big reason – they solve a problem. Painting field lines is a tedious, repetitive task that was begging for automation. Technology from Turf Tank (https://turftank.com/us/) and Tiny Mobile Robots (https://tinymobilerobots.com/field-marking-robot/) have taken athletic field maintenance by storm with painters becoming the fasting growing segment of autonomous turfgrass management.
Range Pickers. Ranges can have a myriad of problems that robots can solve. Large pickers used frequently can compact soil. They are very abrasive to the turf reducing stand density and quality and can cause damage during high soil moisture conditions. Light weight pickers such as the Echo Robotics Range Picker (https://echorobotics.com/en-us/)can be programmed to pick ranges at all hours of the day. It uses the same positioning technology as Echo Robotics mowers – either a WiFi or 4G signal – which massively extends the range of use of the picker.
Slope Climbers. Mowing slopes is a burdensome task. It can be damaging to the turf and dangerous for the operator. Because of the difficulty, some sloped areas are mowed infrequently reducing the turfgrass stand and leading to debris buildup after mowing. The Husqvarna 535 AWD is a compact, light-weight slope mower that can be deployed to cover up to 0.8 acres. While it is random and has a wire boundary, it is efficient, and virtual zones can be created after it has mapped the wire bounded area.
Drop and Mow. Many contrarians are turned off by the idea of fixed position mowers that are bound to a specific docking station and work zone. They would prefer to be able to deploy mowers to other locations during the evaluation phase. The NexMow M1 (https://nexmow.com/) is a deployable drop and mow system that allows for mapping and deployment at hundreds of areas stored on the NexMow app. Simply choose the location that you have mapped and stored in the app, deploy one or multiple mowers, and return to pick up when the app tells you the job is complete.
Mowing Technology. Or the contrarian could just deploy other mowing technology. Mowers from Husqvarna, Kress, and Echo Robotics are all light weight, fully autonomous mowers that can be deployed to mow fairways, rough and tee areas, sports fields, common areas, or large multi-use complexes. This will allow the contrarian to evaluate the cut quality, evaluate the equipment for its functionality at their location, and determine how best to scale with autonomous technology.
To be fair, the economics do not work out until autonomous technology has been deployed at scale—meaning across a majority of the facility. In the beginning, if you are just evaluating a few pieces of equipment, this will likely add a little to your workload in the first year, as you are adding a new piece of technology without subtracting equipment you are already using. This is part of the process of adopting new technology. The time and money saving on a facility basis are not realized until you are at scale.
Final Thoughts
When the iPhone was introduced in 2007 it was an amazing leap in mobile technology. It has changed the way we work, play, and live. The current version of the iPhone is even more amazing – camera technology; the myriad of apps that are available; and how you can do almost anything on the iPhone. I have never heard a single person who bought the original iPhone complain that they should have waited to buy the current iPhone and skipped the 16 years of previous iterations. Sure, the new iPhone is amazing, but so was the original.
I leave the contrarian with this final comparison. The technology released in the US in 2023 will be the dominant technological innovations for the next decade and beyond. There will be upgrades and innovations along the way, but the base technology will remain the same. If you wait for some mythical technological level that may never come, you will miss out on the journey this technology will take us on for years to come.
Disclosure
Dr. McElroy is a professor at Auburn University, and also owns Scotsman Turf Robotics, (http://scotsmanturfrobotics.com) which is a distributor of Husqvarna, Echo Robotics, and NexMow. Scotsman does not distribute Kress, Turf Tank, or Tiny Mobile Robots but sees these as valuable additions to a growing autonomous turfgrass technology industry. Dr. McElroy and Scotsman encourage readers to explore all aspects of autonomous and semi-autonomous equipment that will be the future of turfgrass management. Robotic equipment is currently <1% of the US turf equipment market but is slated to grow substantially over the next five years.
The post Alabama Turfgrass Association – A Contrarian’s Guide to Autonomous Turfgrass Robotic Technology appeared first on The Turf Zone.
PENNSYLVANIA TURFGRASS:
What happens when turf professionals from Penn State Cooperative Extension, the world of professional sports, and the private sector all team up to work on a community turf project? It results in a special “feel-good” synergy that gets the job done and also has great community impact. Westinghouse Academy, an inner-city high school in Pittsburgh serving Wilkinsburg, Homewood, Point Breeze, East Liberty and Highland Park, is getting a safe new football practice field and green activity space, thanks to the combined efforts of Head Coach Donta Green, Extension Educators Jeff Fowler and Michael White, and Thomas ProTurf contractor Jeremy Thomas, who was able to also enlist the help of Steelers groundskeeper Thomas Goynes. We asked where the vison for this project came from and how this turf power team had come together, and it was an inspiring story (Photo 1).
The Bulldogs and Their Coach
The Westinghouse Bulldogs have generated a lot of excitement in Pittsburgh over the last two years. In the words of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, last season, Westinghouse had “a fairy tale season that ended at the doorstep of a state championship.” The Bulldogs (14-1, 4-0) were the first City League school to reach the state finals since Perry High School 25 years ago. Under the charismatic leadership of Coach Donta Green, they were state runner-up in 2022, and Green was quoted as saying, “Our guys are just itching for another shot and another opportunity to do that” this season.
According to Jeff Fowler, “Coach has done some amazing things in his two years with the Westinghouse football program.” Donta Green is also the executive director of The Trade Institute of Pittsburgh, a nonprofit vocational training provider dedicated to providing opportunities for individuals with barriers to employment who need additional support to begin their careers. Founded in 2013, the Trade Institute is located in the Homewood community of Pittsburgh. The football team at Westinghouse reflects this demographic — 65% of the players’ fathers are incarcerated and will have barriers to employment when they re-enter society. And the student athletes who carried the Bulldogs to success last season have not only had to work hard to achieve this excellence, but they have also had multiple barriers to overcome – not the least of which was a practice field that was, like many neglected urban landscapes, run down and treacherous underfoot.
The Connected Community Initiative
Penn State Extension Educator Michael White is a Pittsburgh-based Program Specialist in the Connected Community initiative. He plays a vital role in developing programs that aim to provide equitable opportunities for underserved communities, empowering them to achieve success and personal growth. His goal is to leverage science-based Extension practices to respond to the diverse needs of urban communities, fostering a more vibrant and inclusive environment. “Many of the local green spaces are in distress,” he notes. “However, the Westinghouse Green Space initiative became a priority for me because of its potential to impact so many youths.”
White brought in his colleague, turf expert Jeff Fowler, to assess what it would take to renovate the field at Westinghouse Academy. Based on Fowler’s recommendations, White wrote grants to finance the purchase of seed and fertilizer and arranged to offer training for the school staff on care and maintenance of the new field. Jeff Fowler says he then got excited about the project and invited several of his KAFMO colleagues to get involved and lend a hand – and suddenly, the Westinghouse Green Space project was taking off (Photo 2)!
Jeremy Thomas of Thomas ProTurf is a graduate of Penn State’s Turf Science program and an active KAFMO member who contracts with Steelers groundskeeper Thomas Goynes. Jeremy Thomas agreed to donate his time and equipment to making the Westinghouse renovation project happen and Acrisure Stadium donated the organic waste material Thomas was grinding off the Steelers field for a resod and the Tri-King to transport it to use as fill for the bare spots and top dressing at Westinghouse – a combination of teamwork and recycling in which everybody wins. And as always, success leads to success.
The spotlight on the Westinghouse Bulldogs and their Head Coach has been drawing publicity to the field renovation project now that school is back in session and the teams are starting to practice – KDKA TV has recently approached the school about doing a story on their efforts as this article goes to press (Photo 3).
Multifaceted Impacts
When asked about what impact he anticipates the field renovation will have, Connected Community’s Michael White had a whole list of positive outcomes that reach well beyond the world of sports. “The impact of a school having a safe green space for activities is multifaceted and highly beneficial,” he said. “This dedicated outdoor area is a hub for physical and mental well-being, creating a positive environment for students and staff. With ample space for sports, games, and exercise, it encourages regular physical activity, contributing to better health and fitness,” he went on. “The presence of nature in the school’s surroundings offers stress relief and a calming effect, promoting improved mental health. Furthermore, green spaces provide opportunities for social interactions and outdoor learning, fostering community and connection to the environment. Overall, a safe green space at a school supports physical health and enhances the quality of education and well-being for the students who utilize it,” he concluded.
Field of Dreams
The Westinghouse Green Space renovation is, as of this writing, still a work in progress. In many ways, it is also a kind of Field of Dreams in the unlikely urban streetscape around Westinghouse Academy. But great things can happen when a network of enthusiastic and knowledgeable turf professionals and Extension Educators all join forces; in this case, all things are coming together perfectly to make this project happen for the Bulldog student athletes and their dynamic Coach, Donta Green. Fowler anticipates that the field will be ready for next year’s football season and that Westinghouse will put it to very good use!
The post Pennsylvania Turfgrass Council – Turfgrass Professionals Make Westinghouse Field of Dreams Come True appeared first on The Turf Zone.
NEW ENGLAND BLADE:
Everyone wants better employees and today, that usually requires growing them internally. By starting with a high-potential worker and developing them intentionally, companies are able to build a near-ideal employee ready to tackle their specific issues. But employee development only occurs in the right environment.
Employee growth is not unlike plant growth in that the result is dependent primarily on environmental factors rather than genetic make-up. Unfortunately, managers rarely audit their environment for employee growth potential and even fewer have clear ideas about the factors that would make a strong growth environment. Here are the seven environmental factors that should be considered when cultivating a culture of development:
Advanced Expertise – Employee growth can only occur when there is guidance from an experienced mentor who is setting the pace for production and sharing knowledge. Everyone should have a committed coach or mentor.
Continually Challenged – Advancing to the next professional level never happens by accident, so an environment where everyone is challenged to reach higher levels of performance creates the tension needed to advance intentionally.
Future-Oriented – A team which is focused on past mistakes doesn’t have the right outlook to grow their team. Growth is always the result of forward thinking where a better reality is a goal and positive intent around its achievement is embraced.
Affirming Atmosphere – Development takes a lot of extra work beyond simply the status quo so teams that encourage each other to the next level of their skills are the ones that usually stick it out to see the results. It is the consistency of effort over long periods of time that is enabled through encouragement and brings true results.
Mission Driven – When team members understand what their company does to enhance the lives of their customers and how their role contributes to making a difference, they are more likely to wake up excited and be driven to be the best version of themselves. This energy is essential to growth.
Failure is Embraced – When we learn new skills and put them into practice, failing is a large part of the learning journey. In fact, learned experience is the quickest way to actually know anything. But a negative reaction to mistakes will deplete growth momentum, so wise team leaders expect failures and embrace the opportunities they provide.
Mutual Advancement – People always work best when they’re working together, so teams where every member is growing are far more likely to see positive results. The best environments for growth have individualized and continuous development happening for every person and the culture is one of learning. •
If your team needs more help growing itself to the next level, or your want help building a better growth environment, check out the industry-specific resources available at www.GrowTheBench.com. NESTMA members are invited to connect with
Neal at neal@growthebench.com.
The post NESFMA – Cultivating an Environment of Growth appeared first on The Turf Zone.
MTC NEWS: Fereshteh Shahoveisi
In 2023, our team conducted several fungicide and nematicide trials at the UMD Paint Branch Research Facility to evaluate their efficacy against various turfgrass diseases and nematodes. The trials were mainly focused on:
• Brown patch and dollar spot affecting fairway and green height creeping bentgrass.
• Brown patch on home lawn tall fescue.
• Gray leaf spot on perennial ryegrass.
• Nematicide trials on bermudagrass and perennial ryegrass.
Preliminary findings from these experiments were presented at our Field Day in July. Currently, we are concluding the studies and analyzing the data. For the trials with registered fungicides, reports detailing our observations and results will be made available on our program’s website
(https://sites.google.com/view/umdturfgrasspathology).
In terms of disease progress in the season, May and early June were relatively drier and cooler than the usual averages for the season. This led to a delayed onset of diseases at the farm. However, as summer progressed, the typical weather patterns prevailed, leading to elevated disease pressure. Most diseases, including the brown patch and dollar spot, peaked during this period. By mid to late September, we observed a significant reduction in the prevalence of most diseases.
Turfgrass Variety Trial Update
By Geoffrey Rinehart
Did you know that the University of Maryland turfgrass research program conducts ongoing experiments to evaluate varieties from several different turfgrass species? Using data from these trials and in coordination with data collected by turfgrass researchers at Virginia Tech, and the professionals from the Maryland Department of Agriculture and Virginia Department of Agriculture Seed Laboratories, the “Maryland-Virginia Recommended Varieties List” is updated on annual basis to summarize the top varieties from several of the major turfgrass species used in the Mid-Atlantic provided the varieties are available as certified seed and has been tested by either or both the MD or VA Seed Labs. Typically, these trials are conducted as part of the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program’s (NTEP) research efforts. Previously high-performing varieties which are not included in the most current NTEP trials are planted and evaluated in supplemental trials so that researchers can continue to evaluate these cultivars as one of the criteria for them to remain on the recommended list. NTEP conducts variety trial testing for all major cool- and warm-season turfgrass species in over 35 states throughout the country to identify top-performing varieties both on a national and regional level. The University of Maryland’s NTEP trials, as well as the Annual MD/VA Recommended Varieties List, are an important part of evaluating varieties both locally/regionally and nationally and providing you, the Maryland Turfgrass Professional, with the varieties which will grow well and produce the best turfgrass for your customers. In fact, one of the requirements sod farmers in Maryland must meet is to utilize only varieties found on the MD/VA Recommended Varieties list.
This summary of information can be found in University of Maryland Extension publication TT-77. This and other UMD Extension publications are available to all members and industry professionals on the Maryland Turfgrass Council website. Currently, the UMD turfgrass program has trials evaluating bermudagrass, zoysiagrass, tall fescue, “fine” fescue (includes Red, Chewings, and Sheep Fescues), and Kentucky bluegrass (the newest trial of which was planted in early October 2023).
For more information on the University of Maryland’s turfgrass variety trials, please contact Geoffrey Rinehart (E-mail: rinehart@umd.edu)
The post Maryland Turfgrass Council – Fungicide Trials Update – Turfgrass Pathology Program appeared first on The Turf Zone.
MISSISSIPPI TURFGRASS: J. Scott McElroy, PhD – Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences Auburn University
As a scientist, I hesitate to make predictions such as those a fortune teller might reveal. I wince when I hear people speaking with absolute certainty that this or that will happen in the future. That some team will win, some politician will lose, or that some event will occur is often pure speculation. Absolute predictions are nonsensical, and an affront to probabilistic thinking. To think probabilistically is to think in terms of the percentage of probability that something will occur. This is the foundation of good science.
Having said that, it is highly probable that in the next 10 years autonomous technology will gain a significant portion of the professional and consumer market in the United States. I base this prediction on four pieces of evidence:
Robotic technology has already captured a significant portion of the technology in Europe.
All major brands that market traditional mowing technology or mowing equipment are developing robotic technology.
At one count there were over 40 additional startups and companies developing all manner of robotic technology, including mowers, painters, and sprayers.
The labor shortage will be sustained into the foreseeable future and could potentially increase (https://www.wsj.com/articles/america-still-has-a-worker-shortage-d0c65166).
But here I am addressing the “Contrarian’s Guide to Turfgrass Robotic Technology.” To the robotic contrarian, any positive arguments I present regarding this technology will likely fall on deaf ears. To the contrarian, only seeing is believing. Once my prediction has come true, the contrarian will adopt the technology as self-evident. Don’t get me wrong. Skepticism is a good thing. However, a complete understanding and realistic expectation of what robotic technology can do and where the technology is going is necessary to the healthy skeptic. I want to convince the contrarian that instead of waiting for the technology to be tested by fellow industry partners, they should begin testing and evaluating it themselves. With that in mind, I present this article to the contrarian on fundamentals of robotic technology today.
“The Technology is Just Not There Yet.”
This is the contrarian’s favorite phrase. In frustration I respond, “Where is There?” or even “What is There?”. If the technology has not arrived at the point where it can be adopted, what are its current limitations?
What irks me so much about this critique is the underlying assumptions about imagined technological characteristics that may not even be possible. The contrarian’s perception of automation is that the technology can be easily set up with little or no planning or understanding of the technology. That it may be deployed for use with little, or no, oversight. The phrase, “The Technology is Just Not There Yet,” is normally rooted in some technological advancement in artificial intelligence, or machine learning, that the contrarian has developed based on their perception of technological development, or maybe even a touch of science fiction.
My response is “The technology is what the technology is.” 2022 might as well have been ten years ago when it comes to robotic and autonomous technology in the United States. 2023 saw an incredible number of major advances. These include allowance for extended range connection to 4G and network RTK systems; daisy chaining of reference station signals for greater lengths; creation of virtual zones that can vary in direction, speed, and height of cut; and mobile deployment across multiple sites. The technology launched in 2023 will be the basis of robotic technology for the next five to ten years.
To the contrarian, if you were talking about 2022, I agree. The technology was not “there” for the professional user. It was largely restricted to wire boundary units, mowing randomly at a single fixed zone height. But 2023 completely changed the game.
Autonomous vs. Semi-Autonomous
Before discussing the technology that now makes robotic automation possible, let me make a rather large distinction in technology – Autonomous vs. Semi-Autonomous Technology. Now and in the future, it will be extremely difficult for any mowers with traditional mowing implements to be fully autonomous simply due to liability. As I have been told (I am not an expert on liability, nor am I a lawyer) liability has been and will continue to restrict deployment of certain technology. Such technology – semi-autonomous technology – will require an operator to be watching it while it is completing its task. It will not work at night and will likely not have a fixed position point for deployment. It will need to be taken to the location by hand for deployment. Fully autonomous technology will likely be small, lightweight equipment weighing approximately less than 300 lbs. Again, I may be wrong, but making traditional mowing equipment fully autonomous is going to be challenging to say the least.
Robot Positioning – The Leap Forward in 2023
The technology that made 2023 the year of advancement largely dealt with how the robots position themselves in space. And the one acronym you need to know is RTK.
RTK. RTK stands for Real-Time Kinematic. It is a satellite navigation technique used for enhancing the precision of position data obtained from global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) like GPS (Global Positioning System). RTK is commonly used in applications where high accuracy location information is required, such as surveying, agriculture, construction, and autonomous vehicles. RTK requires a base station in a fixed position that can then communicate to a rover (in our case a mower, painter, or range picker). RTK allows for real time positioning and correction for the rover. RTK signals can stretch from 200 meters to 10 miles depending on the signal type. Husqvarna and Echo Robotics use a fixed position RTK signal that extends 200–300 meters. (Actually, Echo Robotics now has 4G RTK which extends up to 10 miles.)
nRTK. nRTK stands for network real-time kinematics. nRTK is a mesh network system individual companies deploy and then offer other companies for use. For example, NexMow uses nRTK from TopCon (https://global.topcon.com/). Kress (https://www.kress.com/en-us/all-robot-lawn-mowers/) has developed its own nRTK system specifically for its mower technology. Tiny Mobile Robots also uses an nRTK system
for positioning.
RTK, whether a dedicated local RTK reference station, or a nRTK system, allows for positioning of technology in space, allowing for removal of wire from the field and the creation of virtual boundary systems. RTK also allows for directional or systematic work, not random work. With RTK the efficiency of the equipment increases exponentially and the ability to deploy over a wider area has increased.
Where Should the Contrarian Begin?
If it is true that robotic technology will be a common form of turfgrass management in the next five to 10 years, one probably needs to start learning about and adapting the technology now. To be fair, there are some early adopters that have made significant investments in this technology, but the contrarian samples the product before a full commitment. The key to what to utilize first is choosing equipment that solves a problem. Depending on the operation, you already have mowing equipment, so unless you need to make a major purchase, the first goal is to seek out equipment that solves a problem. Here is my list of useful equipment that solves major issues.
Field Painters. Field Painters have been adopted in the United States faster than any other autonomous technology for one big reason – they solve a problem. Painting field lines is a tedious, repetitive task that was begging for automation. Technology from Turf Tank (https://turftank.com/us/) and Tiny Mobile Robots (https://tinymobilerobots.com/field-marking-robot/) have taken athletic field maintenance by storm with painters becoming the fasting growing segment of autonomous turfgrass management.
Range Pickers. Ranges can have a myriad of problems that robots can solve. Large pickers used frequently can compact soil. They are very abrasive to the turf reducing stand density and quality and can cause damage during high soil moisture conditions. Light weight pickers such as the Echo Robotics Range Picker (https://echorobotics.com/en-us/)can be programmed to pick ranges at all hours of the day. It uses the same positioning technology as Echo Robotics mowers – either a WiFi or 4G signal – which massively extends the range of use of the picker.
Slope Climbers. Mowing slopes is a burdensome task. It can be damaging to the turf and dangerous for the operator. Because of the difficulty, some sloped areas are mowed infrequently reducing the turfgrass stand and leading to debris buildup after mowing. The Husqvarna 535 AWD is a compact, light-weight slope mower that can be deployed to cover up to 0.8 acres. While it is random and has a wire boundary, it is efficient, and virtual zones can be created after it has mapped the wire bounded area.
Drop and Mow. Many contrarians are turned off by the idea of fixed position mowers that are bound to a specific docking station and work zone. They would prefer to be able to deploy mowers to other locations during the evaluation phase. The NexMow M1 (https://nexmow.com/) is a deployable drop and mow system that allows for mapping and deployment at hundreds of areas stored on the NexMow app. Simply choose the location that you have mapped and stored in the app, deploy one or multiple mowers, and return to pick up when the app tells you the job is complete.
Mowing Technology. Or the contrarian could just deploy other mowing technology. Mowers from Husqvarna, Kress, and Echo Robotics are all light weight, fully autonomous mowers that can be deployed to mow fairways, rough and tee areas, sports fields, common areas, or large multi-use complexes. This will allow the contrarian to evaluate the cut quality, evaluate the equipment for its functionality at their location, and determine how best to scale with autonomous technology.
To be fair, the economics do not work out until autonomous technology has been deployed at scale—meaning across a majority of the facility. In the beginning, if you are just evaluating a few pieces of equipment, this will likely add a little to your workload in the first year, as you are adding a new piece of technology without subtracting equipment you are already using. This is part of the process of adopting new technology. The time and money saving on a facility basis are not realized until you are at scale.
Final Thoughts
When the iPhone was introduced in 2007 it was an amazing leap in mobile technology. It has changed the way we work, play, and live. The current version of the iPhone is even more amazing – camera technology; the myriad of apps that are available; and how you can do almost anything on the iPhone. I have never heard a single person who bought the original iPhone complain that they should have waited to buy the current iPhone and skipped the 16 years of previous iterations. Sure, the new iPhone is amazing, but so was the original.
I leave the contrarian with this final comparison. The technology released in the US in 2023 will be the dominant technological innovations for the next decade and beyond. There will be upgrades and innovations along the way, but the base technology will remain the same. If you wait for some mythical technological level that may never come, you will miss out on the journey this technology will take us on for years to come.
Disclosure
Dr. McElroy is a professor at Auburn University, and also owns Scotsman Turf Robotics, (http://scotsmanturfrobotics.com) which is a distributor of Husqvarna, Echo Robotics, and NexMow. Scotsman does not distribute Kress, Turf Tank, or Tiny Mobile Robots but sees these as valuable additions to a growing autonomous turfgrass technology industry. Dr. McElroy and Scotsman encourage readers to explore all aspects of autonomous and semi-autonomous equipment that will be the future of turfgrass management. Robotic equipment is currently <1% of the US turf equipment market but is slated to grow substantially over the next five years.
The post Mississippi Turfgrass Association – A Contrarian’s Guide to Autonomous Turfgrass Robotic Technology appeared first on The Turf Zone.
ARKANSAS TURFGRASS: J. Scott McElroy, PhD – Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences Auburn University
As a scientist, I hesitate to make predictions such as those a fortune teller might reveal. I wince when I hear people speaking with absolute certainty that this or that will happen in the future. That some team will win, some politician will lose, or that some event will occur is often pure speculation. Absolute predictions are nonsensical, and an affront to probabilistic thinking. To think probabilistically is to think in terms of the percentage of probability that something will occur. This is the foundation of good science.
Having said that, it is highly probable that in the next 10 years autonomous technology will gain a significant portion of the professional and consumer market in the United States. I base this prediction on four pieces of evidence:
Robotic technology has already captured a significant portion of the technology in Europe.
All major brands that market traditional mowing technology or mowing equipment are developing robotic technology.
At one count there were over 40 additional startups and companies developing all manner of robotic technology, including mowers, painters, and sprayers.
The labor shortage will be sustained into the foreseeable future and could potentially increase (https://www.wsj.com/articles/america-still-has-a-worker-shortage-d0c65166).
But here I am addressing the “Contrarian’s Guide to Turfgrass Robotic Technology.” To the robotic contrarian, any positive arguments I present regarding this technology will likely fall on deaf ears. To the contrarian, only seeing is believing. Once my prediction has come true, the contrarian will adopt the technology as self-evident. Don’t get me wrong. Skepticism is a good thing. However, a complete understanding and realistic expectation of what robotic technology can do and where the technology is going is necessary to the healthy skeptic. I want to convince the contrarian that instead of waiting for the technology to be tested by fellow industry partners, they should begin testing and evaluating it themselves. With that in mind, I present this article to the contrarian on fundamentals of robotic technology today.
“The Technology is Just Not There Yet.”
This is the contrarian’s favorite phrase. In frustration I respond, “Where is There?” or even “What is There?”. If the technology has not arrived at the point where it can be adopted, what are its current limitations?
What irks me so much about this critique is the underlying assumptions about imagined technological characteristics that may not even be possible. The contrarian’s perception of automation is that the technology can be easily set up with little or no planning or understanding of the technology. That it may be deployed for use with little, or no, oversight. The phrase, “The Technology is Just Not There Yet,” is normally rooted in some technological advancement in artificial intelligence, or machine learning, that the contrarian has developed based on their perception of technological development, or maybe even a touch of science fiction.
My response is “The technology is what the technology is.” 2022 might as well have been ten years ago when it comes to robotic and autonomous technology in the United States. 2023 saw an incredible number of major advances. These include allowance for extended range connection to 4G and network RTK systems; daisy chaining of reference station signals for greater lengths; creation of virtual zones that can vary in direction, speed, and height of cut; and mobile deployment across multiple sites. The technology launched in 2023 will be the basis of robotic technology for the next five to ten years.
To the contrarian, if you were talking about 2022, I agree. The technology was not “there” for the professional user. It was largely restricted to wire boundary units, mowing randomly at a single fixed zone height. But 2023 completely changed the game.
Autonomous vs. Semi-Autonomous
Before discussing the technology that now makes robotic automation possible, let me make a rather large distinction in technology – Autonomous vs. Semi-Autonomous Technology. Now and in the future, it will be extremely difficult for any mowers with traditional mowing implements to be fully autonomous simply due to liability. As I have been told (I am not an expert on liability, nor am I a lawyer) liability has been and will continue to restrict deployment of certain technology. Such technology – semi-autonomous technology – will require an operator to be watching it while it is completing its task. It will not work at night and will likely not have a fixed position point for deployment. It will need to be taken to the location by hand for deployment. Fully autonomous technology will likely be small, lightweight equipment weighing approximately less than 300 lbs. Again, I may be wrong, but making traditional mowing equipment fully autonomous is going to be challenging to say the least.
Robot Positioning – The Leap Forward in 2023
The technology that made 2023 the year of advancement largely dealt with how the robots position themselves in space. And the one acronym you need to know is RTK.
RTK. RTK stands for Real-Time Kinematic. It is a satellite navigation technique used for enhancing the precision of position data obtained from global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) like GPS (Global Positioning System). RTK is commonly used in applications where high accuracy location information is required, such as surveying, agriculture, construction, and autonomous vehicles. RTK requires a base station in a fixed position that can then communicate to a rover (in our case a mower, painter, or range picker). RTK allows for real time positioning and correction for the rover. RTK signals can stretch from 200 meters to 10 miles depending on the signal type. Husqvarna and Echo Robotics use a fixed position RTK signal that extends 200–300 meters. (Actually, Echo Robotics now has 4G RTK which extends up to 10 miles.)
nRTK. nRTK stands for network real-time kinematics. nRTK is a mesh network system individual companies deploy and then offer other companies for use. For example, NexMow uses nRTK from TopCon (https://global.topcon.com/). Kress (https://www.kress.com/en-us/all-robot-lawn-mowers/) has developed its own nRTK system specifically for its mower technology. Tiny Mobile Robots also uses an nRTK system
for positioning.
RTK, whether a dedicated local RTK reference station, or a nRTK system, allows for positioning of technology in space, allowing for removal of wire from the field and the creation of virtual boundary systems. RTK also allows for directional or systematic work, not random work. With RTK the efficiency of the equipment increases exponentially and the ability to deploy over a wider area has increased.
Where Should the Contrarian Begin?
If it is true that robotic technology will be a common form of turfgrass management in the next five to 10 years, one probably needs to start learning about and adapting the technology now. To be fair, there are some early adopters that have made significant investments in this technology, but the contrarian samples the product before a full commitment. The key to what to utilize first is choosing equipment that solves a problem. Depending on the operation, you already have mowing equipment, so unless you need to make a major purchase, the first goal is to seek out equipment that solves a problem. Here is my list of useful equipment that solves major issues.
Field Painters. Field Painters have been adopted in the United States faster than any other autonomous technology for one big reason – they solve a problem. Painting field lines is a tedious, repetitive task that was begging for automation. Technology from Turf Tank (https://turftank.com/us/) and Tiny Mobile Robots (https://tinymobilerobots.com/field-marking-robot/) have taken athletic field maintenance by storm with painters becoming the fasting growing segment of autonomous turfgrass management.
Range Pickers. Ranges can have a myriad of problems that robots can solve. Large pickers used frequently can compact soil. They are very abrasive to the turf reducing stand density and quality and can cause damage during high soil moisture conditions. Light weight pickers such as the Echo Robotics Range Picker (https://echorobotics.com/en-us/)can be programmed to pick ranges at all hours of the day. It uses the same positioning technology as Echo Robotics mowers – either a WiFi or 4G signal – which massively extends the range of use of the picker.
Slope Climbers. Mowing slopes is a burdensome task. It can be damaging to the turf and dangerous for the operator. Because of the difficulty, some sloped areas are mowed infrequently reducing the turfgrass stand and leading to debris buildup after mowing. The Husqvarna 535 AWD is a compact, light-weight slope mower that can be deployed to cover up to 0.8 acres. While it is random and has a wire boundary, it is efficient, and virtual zones can be created after it has mapped the wire bounded area.
Drop and Mow. Many contrarians are turned off by the idea of fixed position mowers that are bound to a specific docking station and work zone. They would prefer to be able to deploy mowers to other locations during the evaluation phase. The NexMow M1 (https://nexmow.com/) is a deployable drop and mow system that allows for mapping and deployment at hundreds of areas stored on the NexMow app. Simply choose the location that you have mapped and stored in the app, deploy one or multiple mowers, and return to pick up when the app tells you the job is complete.
Mowing Technology. Or the contrarian could just deploy other mowing technology. Mowers from Husqvarna, Kress, and Echo Robotics are all light weight, fully autonomous mowers that can be deployed to mow fairways, rough and tee areas, sports fields, common areas, or large multi-use complexes. This will allow the contrarian to evaluate the cut quality, evaluate the equipment for its functionality at their location, and determine how best to scale with autonomous technology.
To be fair, the economics do not work out until autonomous technology has been deployed at scale—meaning across a majority of the facility. In the beginning, if you are just evaluating a few pieces of equipment, this will likely add a little to your workload in the first year, as you are adding a new piece of technology without subtracting equipment you are already using. This is part of the process of adopting new technology. The time and money saving on a facility basis are not realized until you are at scale.
Final Thoughts
When the iPhone was introduced in 2007 it was an amazing leap in mobile technology. It has changed the way we work, play, and live. The current version of the iPhone is even more amazing – camera technology; the myriad of apps that are available; and how you can do almost anything on the iPhone. I have never heard a single person who bought the original iPhone complain that they should have waited to buy the current iPhone and skipped the 16 years of previous iterations. Sure, the new iPhone is amazing, but so was the original.
I leave the contrarian with this final comparison. The technology released in the US in 2023 will be the dominant technological innovations for the next decade and beyond. There will be upgrades and innovations along the way, but the base technology will remain the same. If you wait for some mythical technological level that may never come, you will miss out on the journey this technology will take us on for years to come.
Disclosure
Dr. McElroy is a professor at Auburn University, and also owns Scotsman Turf Robotics, (http://scotsmanturfrobotics.com) which is a distributor of Husqvarna, Echo Robotics, and NexMow. Scotsman does not distribute Kress, Turf Tank, or Tiny Mobile Robots but sees these as valuable additions to a growing autonomous turfgrass technology industry. Dr. McElroy and Scotsman encourage readers to explore all aspects of autonomous and semi-autonomous equipment that will be the future of turfgrass management. Robotic equipment is currently <1% of the US turf equipment market but is slated to grow substantially over the next five years.
The post Arkansas Turfgrass Association – A Contrarian’s Guide to Autonomous Turfgrass Robotic Technology appeared first on The Turf Zone.
PENNSYLVANIA TURFGRASS: Brad Jakubowski, Assistant Teaching Professor, Center for Turfgrass Science, Penn State University
Keeping an eye on the weather is something professional turfgrass managers have ingrained into our systems. Can I mow today? We check our phones for the most recent forecast. Should I spray today? We monitor dewpoints, humidity and temperatures. Will I pull the tarp prior to today’s game? We study the weather radar. There is a tremendous amount of weather information out there and nearly all of us have some form of a weather app on our phones, or a link to our favorite weather website, to help us make day-to-day management decisions. Let’s take a journey, to see what is out there and what information will help us make the best weather-based decisions possible.
Which app is the best?
Honestly, there is no one best app. It is important to find an app or a number of apps that provide you the most reliable and quickly available information. Basic Information that is important to have available with the least number of clicks would be: High and Low Temperatures (including overnight lows), Dewpoint, Relative Humidity, and Short-Term Weather forecasts. Intermediate information includes: Radar (Base and Composite Reflectivity), Satellite Imagery, and Severe Weather (especially lightning). Advanced information would be: Echo Tops, Vertically Integrated Liquid, Digital Storm Accumulation and Forecast Discussion.
Basic Information
When looking for basic information, it is best to have most or all important data on the first screen, or within one or two clicks from the first screen. That is often a good way to judge how well your app will benefit you over time. As an example, The National Weather Service includes much of the basic data (Figure 1). At a glance, you can get a good idea of what is happening now and what will happen in the immediate future. High and low temperatures provide a quick mental image of how the day (and night) may influence your maintenance plans. Winds, dewpoint and relative humidity provide a quick insight on irrigation requirements, disease potential, and infield skin management requirements.
It is beneficial to see both relative humidity and dewpoint together. Viewing only either limits your view of the big picture. For example, a relative humidity of 95% with dewpoints near 70 degrees indicate that less time may be spent scouting for wilt and instead used scouting for diseases. The same relative humidity with dewpoints under 30 may indicate a majority of the day may be dedicated for scouting wilt or watering an infield skin.
The Hourly Forecast – The Turf Manager’s Secret Weapon!
The Hourly Forecast on Weather.gov (Figure 2) is the turf manager’s secret weapon. In one image, a turf manager can make plans for multiple issues and tasks. For Example, The Heat Index: potential high heat indexes aids in planning for employee safety; Temperature and Dewpoint: Matched high overnight dewpoints and temperatures means extended leaf wetness and high disease potential. They also indicate heavy dew until at least 8am, which may require a syringe cycle to limit mower clumping, or to make sure greens are whipped post-cut; Wind Speed and Direction (Surface Wind): predicted light southerly winds meaning even higher probability for disease potential and dew, as well as for good spraying conditions in the early morning, but gusts in the teens starting around 11am; Relative Humidity: indicates conditions will be wet early, but dry quickly throughout the day; Sky Cover: indicates it will be partly cloudy throughout the day providing some relief, while Precipitation Potential indicate a 50% chance of rain throughout the day.
Intermediate Information
When making game-time decisions such as tarp pulls, or field evacuations, due to severe weather, radar becomes an important tool. There are numerous good weather radar apps available. Many are free, some require an annual fee of $US 10 to 50. Many of the fee-based apps offer expanded functionality, precision and overall quality of information. Regardless of cost, radar app selection should prioritize the type of reflectivity the radar images are based upon. There are two types: Base Reflectivity and Composite Reflectivity. Each time a radar transmitter spins, it sends out a microwave ‘sweep’ at different elevations to get a complete picture of all atmosphere elevations. A Base Reflectivity image represents only a single sweep of the radar transmitter. This means that near the transmitter the radar ‘sees’ is low in the storms and as distance increases the beam rises and can overshoot the core of heavier precipitation. Many High-Resolution (Hi-Res) radar images feature only Base Reflectivity sweeps.
Composite Reflectivity stitches together all elevation scans, in order, to create an image that represents a more complete picture of an incoming storm. These are often lower-resolution images and may be more pixelated. Figures 3 and 4 are of the same storm with the former being a Base Reflectivity image and the latter a Composite Reflectivity image.
Figure 5 shows the different reflectivity options you may have within a radar app, and again illustrates not all radar imagery is the same. So, when trying to make critical game-time decisions, a radar image using Base Reflectivity may grossly underestimate the significance of an incoming storm. When selecting a radar app, be sure investigate the types of radar images it provides, and be prepared to spend a few dollars for radar that will prove worthwhile in the future.
Satellite Imagery
There are numerous Satellite Imagery options as well. They provide visible cloud cover; infrared (the most common that we see), moisture content; and all-in-one maps that include a combination of radar, infrared, and weather station models to tell a complete weather story. Satellite images can give you a broader perspective of how the weather is behaving on a wider, more continental, scale. The images and loops illustrate air flow, cloud and moisture movement and overall dynamics of frontal systems. These large-scale images and video loops can help in longer-term planning. They can aid in project preparation and used as a tool to help protect fields when communicating with administrators that may be considering additional unexpected events during non-use days. It is useful to compare these images with regular weather maps to get a good working knowledge of fronts and changing weather systems.
Severe Weather
Lightning is the most critical facet of severe weather for sport turf managers. In 2022, one in five people struck by lightning were engaged in an outdoor sporting activity. Having an app that can provide you lightning information instantly or within a click on your phone is important. The lightning information from the WeatherBug app for Figure 6 only required a short scroll down and a single click. An old AM radio is also good to have on-hand as a back up lightning detector. Significant increase in crackles and static transmitted across AM radio bands are dependable indicators of lightning activity in the area. Old School!
Advanced Information
As we work towards becoming more proficient with understanding weather and being able to make better weather-based decisions, we find more advanced tools to help us. Echo Tops or Cloud Height is another function to help us assess the intensity of an oncoming storm. An Echo Top measures the overall height of a storm, which is an indicator of the strength of storm updrafts. Stronger updrafts make convective wind gusts and large hail more likely.
When several storms are on radar, the Echo Tops tool can point out the more severe storms and the direction they are travelling (Figure 7). This can be valuable information to report to the front office when asked about making a call on a game or whether the conditions will be safe to conduct a last-minute tarp pull. Another tool to assess the strength of a storm is Vertically Integrated Liquid (VIL). The VIL index measures how much water is being transported vertically throughout a storm cloud and is another indicator of a storm’s updraft strength. Taller updrafts tend to have higher values of VIL and are more likely to produce hail.
One more tool that can be used to help determine the total accumulation of a precipitation event is Digital Storm Accumulation. By allowing you to assess discrete accumulations over short periods of time, this tool may help you determine whether or not to pull a field cover for a particular rain event. Saving time and energy that could be used elsewhere and avoid unnecessary delays. This tool may also aid in determining the potential of a flash flood event in your area.
Summary
Technological advancements afford us incredibly convenient tools and information apps that support worker and clientele safety while improving our maintenance, irrigation, pest management, and playability decision-making. Take advantage of this opportunity by investigating these different apps and functions. Poll your colleagues, service providers, and blogs/forums to best experiment and discover what works best for you and your facility.
The post Pennsylvania Turfgrass Council – Weather Apps and Weather Decisions – Let’s Make the Most of Both! appeared first on The Turf Zone.
TENNESSEE TURFGRASS: Kyley Dickson, Ph.D.
When it comes time to reseed or renovate an area in the fall or spring, selecting the most suitable grass variety can be a challenging task. Over the years, plant breeders and seed companies have made significant advancements in enhancing their grasses through plant breeding. These improvements include developing grasses with resistance or increased tolerance to specific diseases, better drought tolerance, and an enhanced ability to withstand extreme climatic conditions. However, verifying these claims is crucial. To address this, various research programs conduct tests on new turfgrass varieties under different conditions, comparing them with standard grasses that have been used for many years.
Research programs are essential in identifying new varieties of turfgrasses that stand out as premium performers and discovering how much they have improved. For instance, Kentucky 31 tall fescue, which was identified in Kentucky in 1931, is still available for purchase at most stores that sell grass seed today. The improvements in technology have increased efficiency and overall performance of turfgrasses, just like how cars have evolved from 1931 to today. Plant breeders make major improvements every year, with many of these new varieties being more efficient with fewer inputs and more adapted to difficult environments. Breeders look at several variables such as plant density, color, leaf thickness, disease resistance, drought tolerance, and traffic tolerance to improve turfgrasses.
The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is a renowned turfgrass research program that has gained global recognition. It has expanded to evaluate seventeen turfgrass species across forty U.S. states and six Canadian provinces. The program collects and summarizes data on various aspects of turfgrass, including quality, color, density, resistance to diseases and insects, and tolerance to heat, cold, drought, and traffic. NTEP’s findings are used by plant breeders, researchers, extension personnel, local and state government entities, growers, and consumers worldwide. The program has become the standard for turfgrass evaluation in the United States and many other countries.
The NTEP trials are carried out over a consecutive five-year period at various research universities across the nation. The researchers monitor the quality of each variety, recording monthly results. At the end of each year, they publish an updated report on the trials. The NTEP data is a valuable resource that can help determine grass varieties that are ideal for low maintenance, traffic tolerance, and overall quality. This is due to the wide range of trials conducted by the program. The data is freely accessible to everyone on NTEP.org. Additionally, the NTEP has introduced a new search tool that allows users to identify different grasses based on species, location, or variety. You can also scan the QR code provided to visit the NTEP website directly.
It’s important to note that while the data is available online, there are no certifications or approval of varieties from the NTEP. The information solely reflects how well a particular grass variety performed in the trials. Nevertheless, this resource is highly beneficial when selecting turfgrass varieties. Next time you purchase a seed bag, take a moment to examine the tag and review how the grasses fared in the NTEP trials. Opting for a variety that performed well in your area according to NTEP results will likely yield superior results. Keep in mind that certain varieties may thrive better in specific regions of the country compared to others. Therefore, it’s advisable to consider the locations of the tests and select a variety that closely represents your area.
There are organizations that offer approved varieties or certifications. Two such organizations are the Alliance for Low Input Sustainable Turf (A-LIST) and the Turfgrass Water Conservation Alliance (TWCA). Similar to the NTEP, both the A-LIST and TWCA conduct research trials at universities across the U.S. to evaluate grasses. Currently, these trials are limited to cool season grasses.
The Alliance for Low Input Sustainable Turf (A-LIST) is a national non-profit organization that aims to assist turfgrass managers and grass growers in achieving sustainable plant growth. The organization comprises universities and industry companies that work together to test, identify, and promote grass varieties that combine high turf quality with low-input performance. These varieties are designed to reduce water, chemical, and fertility requirements. The A-LIST provides information on certified, high-quality turf that is verified through transparent protocols and independently tested. The A-LIST focuses on varieties respond to reduced inputs such as water, fungicides, insecticides, herbicides, and fertility. To become A-LIST approved, grasses must be in the top statistical grouping at multiple locations over multiple years.
The Turfgrass Water Conservation Alliance (TWCA) is a non-profit organization committed to water conservation and dedicated to preserving the ecological benefits of turfgrass in the managed environment. The organization believes that by improving the plant materials available, they can reduce the water needs of the managed environment while preserving the vital ecological services provided by green space. The TWCA provides independent transparent analysis of objective data, which anchors their peer-reviewed qualification process. The TWCA program assesses drought tolerance of grasses using rainout shelters to simulate drought conditions and measure their resilience.
The research funded from these organizations instills confidence that the grasses possess the improved traits claimed by the respective organizations. Both programs indicate their approval by displaying their logos on seed tags located on each bag. Currently, there are only approvals for seed for cool-season grasses. These programs have resulted in greater breeding efforts that has resulted in the traits each of these organizations are focused on. The work these organizations have done to improve areas of breeding that have not always been the highest priority is tremendous. Both organizations are formed from groups of seed companies that saw a need and have funded research to further breeding in each area and decided to make it happen. For a comprehensive list of approved varieties, please refer to each organization’s websites https://a-listturf.org or https://www.tgwca.org, or scan the QR codes.
Using grass varieties that require lower inputs is better for the environment. These varieties are more sustainable because they need less water, or fertilizer, or pesticides to thrive. By reducing the use of these inputs, we can minimize the environmental impact and promote a healthier ecosystem. These new varieties require fewer chemical treatments and less water, making them more environmentally friendly. Additionally, they can help conserve water resources and reduce the need for synthetic fertilizers.
If you think, “It’s great that they have these approvals for low inputs and water reduction, but how did they do in our area?” Well for those who live in Tennessee, table 1 is a top ten list of reduced input of tall fescue varieties and table 2 is for Kentucky bluegrass. These tables show either A-LIST or TWCA varieties that did well in Tennessee’s NTEP and all the NTEP trials overall that grass species overall. There are three varieties of tall fescue and Kentucky bluegrasses that are in bold, these highlighted varieties would be the top three varieties for use in Tennessee due to their superior performance in research trials. The other top ten are great varieties perform well in Tennessee, the bolded varieties simply highlight the top performers according to the criteria used to rank the grasses overall. All the grass varieties in both lists should have superior performance in these conditions and can survive in more stressful conditions than traditional standard varieties. Not all grasses are great in all circumstances, sticking with the car analogy you would not use a small car to try and pull a semi-trailer, as with grasses some are adapted for certain uses better than others. Keep in mind that even the most adapted grasses can still die and do poorly if the conditions for growth become too harsh.
Table 1. Top Ten Tall Fescue Reduced Input Varieties for Tennessee
VarietyCompanyALIST ApprovedTWCA ApprovedNTEP TrafficNTEP KnoxvilleNTEP Overall
Firecracker GLSMountain View SeedsXXXX
Grande 3DLFXXXX
SuperSonicMountain View SeedsXXXX
Xanadu (JT-268)BarenbrugXXX
Bonfire (JS DTT)BarenbrugXXX
ReflectionLandmark Turf and Native SeedsXXX
LifeguardPureseedXXX
SaltilloPureseedXX
2nd MillenniumTurf Merchants, Inc.XX
Avenger IIIMountain View SeedsXXX
Table 2. Top Ten Reduced Input Kentucky Bluegrass Varieties for Tennessee
VarietyCompanyA-LIST ApprovedTWCA ApprovedNTEP TrafficNTEP KnoxvilleNTEP Overall
Blue NoteMountain View SeedsXXXX
BluebankLandmark Turf and Native SeedsXXXX
BarseratiBarenbrugXXXX
JackrabbitDLFXX
ZinfandelLebanon TurfXX
BedazzledTurf Merchants, Inc.XX
HamptonLandmark Turf and Native SeedsXX
BarristerBarenbrugXX
SyrahLebanon TurfXX
YellowstoneLandmark Turf and Native SeedsXX
The data from the NTEP is from Knoxville at the University of Tennessee trial site. To explain the table there is an X by each area that a grass was the top statistical category for that area. The columns show if they are A-LIST or TWCA approved. Additionally, there is a column indicating they were in the top statistical performer for the NTEP traffic trial, this indicates that the varieties had superior traffic tolerance good for high use areas. Additionally, the top statistical category for the NTEP trial in Knoxville, this helps to see how these varieties would do in an area with similar growing conditions to Knoxville.
The last column is when all the NTEP locations for that trial are taken and averaged, these grasses were in the top performers for the trial overall.
One of the limitations of the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is that many of the varieties it tests are not commercially available or may never go into commercial production for various reasons. However, this article aims to provide tables of commercially available varieties that can be purchased today. These varieties can help improve management situations where inputs are limited or where you simply want a variety with improved genetics that offers optimum performance. However, locating these improved varieties can be challenging. I have included a list of companies that currently sell these products in the tables. It is important to note that these higher-end products are typically not available at big-box stores; instead, they can be found at landscape supply stores, distributors, or sod farms.
It is important to note that grass varieties that thrive in one region may not perform well in another. Therefore, it is advisable to look at the NTEP data for your specific area. The NTEP provides valuable information about grass varieties that excel in different regions. For instance, certain varieties may flourish in Utah but struggle in Tennessee. By selecting the right variety for your area, you can optimize your turfgrass management and achieve better results.
Grass breeding efforts have significantly contributed to improving sustainability and adaptability. Universities such as Rutgers, Oklahoma State University, University of Georgia at Tifton, Texas A&M University, University of Florida, Mississippi State University, and North Carolina State University, along with seed companies, have made remarkable progress in breeding grass varieties with improved genetics. These varieties listed in the tables are more resistant to pests, diseases, and drought. They require fewer chemical treatments and less water, making them more environmentally friendly. By leveraging these advancements in grass breeding, you can enhance your turfgrass management situation and contribute to a greener and healthier environment.
In a world where resources are becoming increasingly scarce, it is crucial to choose grasses that are well-suited to their environment. This article presents an overview of some of the top cool season grasses to consider when making selections in Tennessee. In the southern part of the state, cool season grasses may struggle to thrive, making warm season grasses a more viable option. Tennessee has seen great success with many warm season grasses, including Bermudagrass and Zoysia. The tables are specifically cool season grasses that are two commonly used grasses in Tennessee. The advancements in breeding in the last two decades show some amazing improvements in a short period of time. When renovating or reseeding an area this fall, consider opting for seeds with improved genetics. Doing so will result in better turf quality and contribute to a healthier environment overall. If you are unsure whether to choose cool or warm season grasses, consult with a University of Tennessee County Extension agent for guidance.
The post Tennessee Turfgrass Association – Improving Turfgrass Sustainability with Better Genetics appeared first on The Turf Zone.
MTC TURF NEWS: Geoffrey Rinehart
Did you know that the University of Maryland turfgrass research program conducts ongoing experiments to evaluate varieties from several different turfgrass species? Using data from these trials and in coordination with data collected by turfgrass researchers at Virginia Tech, and the professionals from the Maryland Department of Agriculture and Virginia Department of Agriculture Seed Laboratories, the “Maryland-Virginia Recommended Varieties List” is updated on annual basis to summarize the top varieties from several of the major turfgrass species used in the Mid-Atlantic provided the varieties are available as certified seed and has been tested by either or both the MD or VA Seed Labs. Typically, these trials are conducted as part of the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program’s (NTEP) research efforts. Previously high-performing varieties which are not included in the most current NTEP trials are planted and evaluated in supplemental trials so that researchers can continue to evaluate these cultivars as one of the criteria for them to remain on the recommended list. NTEP conducts variety trial testing for all major cool- and warm-season turfgrass species in over 35 states throughout the country to identify top-performing varieties both on a national and regional level. The University of Maryland’s NTEP trials, as well as the Annual MD/VA Recommended Varieties List, are an important part of evaluating varieties both locally/regionally and nationally and providing you, the Maryland Turfgrass Professional, with the varieties which will grow well and produce the best turfgrass for your customers. In fact, one of the requirements sod farmers in Maryland must meet is to utilize only varieties found on the MD/VA Recommended Varieties list.
This summary of information can be found in University of Maryland Extension publication TT-77. This and other UMD Extension publications are available to all members and industry professionals on the Maryland Turfgrass Council website. Currently, the UMD turfgrass program has trials evaluating bermudagrass, zoysiagrass, tall fescue, “fine” fescue (includes Red, Chewings, and Sheep Fescues), and Kentucky bluegrass (the newest trial of which was planted in early October 2023).
For more information on the University of Maryland’s turfgrass variety trials, please contact Geoffrey Rinehart (E-mail: rinehart@umd.edu) •
Fungicide Trials Update – Turfgrass Pathology Program
By Fereshteh Shahoveisi
In 2023, our team conducted several fungicide and nematicide trials at the UMD Paint Branch Research Facility to evaluate their efficacy against various turfgrass diseases and nematodes. The trials were mainly focused on:
• Brown patch and dollar spot affecting fairway and green height creeping bentgrass.
• Brown patch on home lawn tall fescue.
• Gray leaf spot on perennial ryegrass.
• Nematicide trials on bermudagrass and perennial ryegrass.
Preliminary findings from these experiments were presented at our Field Day in July. Currently, we are concluding the studies and analyzing the data. For the trials with registered fungicides, reports detailing our observations and results will be made available on our program’s website
(https://sites.google.com/view/umdturfgrasspathology).
In terms of disease progress in the season, May and early June were relatively drier and cooler than the usual averages for the season. This led to a delayed onset of diseases at the farm. However, as summer progressed, the typical weather patterns prevailed, leading to elevated disease pressure. Most diseases, including the brown patch and dollar spot, peaked during this period. By mid to late September, we observed a significant reduction in the prevalence of most diseases. •
The post Maryland Turfgrass Council – Research Updates from UMD / Turfgrass Variety Trial Update appeared first on The Turf Zone.
NEW ENGLAND BLADE: Pam Serratt
Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) is the predominant cool-season sports turf grass. It was originally introduced to the United States as an amenity grass, forage grass, and for soil erosion control, and we’ve been successfully using turf-types since their introduction in the 1960s. Although perennial ryegrass is revered in Europe, it is somewhat suffered in the United States, with some cool-season turf managers preferring to seed only Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), even if the chance of success is minimal. The distaste for perennial ryegrass as a sports turf grass has always perplexed me, since I know that most fields are already comprised of ryegrass, and I know just how great it can perform as a sports surface. It does have its challenges, but I believe its pros outweigh its cons. Let’s delve deeper in a point-counterpoint format:
Point: It is a bunch-type grass, and therefore does not have the capability to spread laterally.
Counterpoint: Ryegrass is a prolific producer of tillers and provides great sward density – particularly if mowed at the lower end of the preferred height of cut (1 – 2″). In studies conducted at Ohio State over many years, ryegrass has had recuperative potential as good as Kentucky bluegrass or tall fescue under traffic. In addition to its recuperative ability, it is very wear tolerant, and persists during heavy traffic.
Point: Because it is a bunch-type grass, fields must be constantly overseeded.
Counterpoint: There is no such thing as an athletic field that doesn’t need to be constantly overseeded, regardless of turf type. On native soils, where traffic and compaction are commonplace, all cool-season turfgrasses need regular overseeding to keep fields playable and safe.
Point: It is slippery.
Counterpoint: It is shiny on the underside of the leaf, which makes it look wet from a distance.
Point: It has poor heat, drought and cold tolerance.
Counterpoint: Like bluegrass and tall fescue, it is a cool-season grass, and so prefers air temperatures of 60 – 75° (15 – 24°C) and soil temps of 50 – 65°F (10 – 18°C). In extreme conditions, it may not be as heat and drought tolerant as tall fescue, or as cold tolerant as bluegrass, but it will survive in most areas.
Point: It is susceptible to grubs.
Counterpoint: Like many other turfgrasses, it is susceptible to grubs. However, many perennial ryegrass cultivars contain endophytes (microscopic fungi in the plant cells) that prevent attack from surface-feeding pests such as bluegrass billbugs, chinch bugs and sod webworms.
Point: It is difficult to mow in spring when flower stems are forming. This can result in poor mowing quality.
Counterpoint: Modern cultivars and sharp mower blades greatly reduce or eliminate this problem.
Point: In fall and spring, ryegrass does not mix well with other grasses. The color is different, and the clumps of ryegrass stand out.
Counterpoint: Ryegrass staying green longer into the fall/early winter and greening up quickly in spring is a major advantage for sports turf managers with fall or spring sports. Masking color differences can be achieved by applications of PGRs, iron or nitrogen fertilizers, choosing bluegrass cultivars with short winter dormancy, or spraying the field with a green dye in early spring. Some turf managers may also cover the field with a growth blanket, to promote uniform spring growth of all the grasses. In Europe, ryegrass cultivars are much lighter green, to mask the Poa annua that invariably encroaches on sports fields.
Point: Ryegrass takes over the field like a weed.
Counterpoint: The number-one reason it does so well is its ability to germinate and establish quickly. The ability to grow quickly means it can shade out the bluegrass and prevent seed germination and establishment. Athletic fields are not perennial stands of grass like lawns; they are in a constant state of renovation and, as such, the key to success is a quick establishing grass.
Point: Perennial ryegrass is susceptible to a whole host of turfgrass diseases.
Counterpoint: Yes, it is. No arguing on this point. If the conditions are favorable for a disease attack, ryegrass is prone to get it. Turf managers need to be extremely vigilant with summer applications of irrigation and nitrogen, and choose cultivars that have shown improved disease resistance. Where possible, especially on game fields, preventative applications of fungicide may be required. As a side note, however, because it is so quick to grow, it can sometimes survive a disease like damping off much more successfully than slower-growing species.
Pamela Sherratt is sports turf extension specialist at The Ohio State University. Connect with Pam at sherratt.1@osu.edu.
This article originally appeared in the June 2023 issue of SportsField Management magazine.
The post NESFMA – Perennial Ryegrass on Athletic Fields appeared first on The Turf Zone.
ATA Turf Times - Eric Reasor, Ph.D. – Southeast Research Scientist, PBI-Gordon Corporation Pesticides have undergone significant changes in the past 50 years with an increased focus on environmental and applicator safety. Alabama Turfgrass Association members and the entire turfgrass industry will see pesticide technologies in the future look very different than the past. However, [...]
The post Alabama Turfgrass Association – Pesticides of the Future appeared first on The Turf Zone.
MTC Turf News - Vernon Cooper, Executive Director, MTC Anyone who missed the 46 Annual MTC Winter Conference on December 14, 2021, at Turf Valley Resort missed a real opportunity for up-to-date education, fantastic networking, and of course picking up needed Pesticide and Fertilizer Law Applicator recertification from MD and surrounding jurisdictions plus Education Points [...]
The post Maryland Turfgrass Council – MTC Annual Conference appeared first on The Turf Zone.
Virginia Turfgrass Journal - Tom Serensits and Andy McNitt The heart of the fall sports season is now upon us. Although the stresses of summer heat have passed, the rigors of games and practices are not only hard on players and coaches, but the playing field too (Fig 1). A few simple tips can help [...]
The post Virginia Turfgrass Council – Mid-Season Field Checkup appeared first on The Turf Zone.
New England Blade - Neal Glatt, CSP, ASM The very best managers and team leaders are those who check-in with their team members on a regular basis. Yet even experienced leaders can miss opportunities for employee engagement and success without a great game plan for these conversations. Here’s how I help managers make the most [...]
The post NESTMA – Making the Most of Team Member Check-Ins appeared first on The Turf Zone.
North Carolina Turfgrass - Julie Holt, Content Director, TheTurfZone.com Warm-Season Turfgrass Breeder Presents Zoysiagrass with Novel Traits North Carolina State University’s Turfgrass Breeding and Genetics program, under the direction of Dr. Susana Milla-Lewis, has released Lobo™ Zoysiagrass (experimental name XZ 14069). Researchers selected Lobo from hundreds of nursery mates for its unusual combination of aggressive [...]
The post Turfgrass Council of North Carolina – NC State Turfgrass Releases Lobo™ Zoysiagrass appeared first on The Turf Zone.
ATA Turf Times - Dave Han, Ph.D., Auburn University and Alabama Extension The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) is a fantastic source for information on newly-released and upcoming turfgrass varieties. Since 1983, NTEP has been evaluating turfgrass varieties and making data from those variety trials available for free to the public. A survey of turfgrass [...]
The post Alabama Turfgrass Association – Using Results from the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) appeared first on The Turf Zone.
Arkansas Turfgrass - Thomas Walton, MS Student and Mike Richardson, Ph.D, University of Arkansas Widespread record low temperatures were experienced throughout much of Arkansas and the surrounding region in the late winter of 2021. At the Drake Field weather station, just south of Fayetteville, -20 °F was recorded on the morning of February 16th! However, [...]
The post Arkansas Turfgrass Association – Winter is Coming: Protect your Putting Greens! appeared first on The Turf Zone.
Mississippi Turfgrass - Drs. Edicarlos de Castro and Jay McCurdy, Mississippi State University Turfgrass occupies an estimated 40 to 50 million acres in the United States, approximately 40% of which is maintained lawn around homes, places of business, and institutions. There are numerous environmental and societal benefits of turfgrass in the human built environment, and [...]
The post Mississippi Turfgrass Association – Industry Leaders Partner with Refuge Lawn to Help Guide Research and Extension Outreach appeared first on The Turf Zone.
Arkansas Turfgrass - Barry Stewart, Ph.D. Associate Professor – Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University Athletic field managers combine science, art, and long hours of hard work to provide playing surfaces that are safe, playable, and aesthetically pleasing. As Alabama Turfgrass Association members know, there are numerous “standards” that give guidance to [...]
The post Arkansas Turfgrass Association – A New Standard for Sports Field Management appeared first on The Turf Zone.
New England Blade - Julie Holt, Content Director, TheTurfZone.com Assistant Grounds Superintendent, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island Sports Management & Turfgrass Management, University of Massachusetts – Amherst How did you get your start in the sports turf industry? At an early age, I started landscaping around my childhood home with my father, grandfather, [...]
The post NESTMA – Member Spotlight on Nick Mol appeared first on The Turf Zone.
Virginia Turfgrass Journal – Mike Goatley, Professor &Extension Turfgrass Specialist, Virginia Tech, Tom Kuhar, Professor & Entomologist, Virginia Tech and Alejandro Del Pozo, Assistant Professor & Entomologist, Virginia Tech
Fall armyworms have been a statewide/regional problem on turfgrass systems across the Mid-Atlantic and upper South in 2021. Although it is of little consolation, if your turf has been attacked, we can assure you that you are not alone this year. Dr. Tom Kuhar, Professor of Entomology at Virginia Tech, details that in his 20+ year career at VT that he has never seen as much pressure from fall armyworms as he has this year. Here are some key points to share with your team and with your clientele for why the problem is so extreme in 2021.
Why so much pressure this year? We never quite know what each year has in store for us and our best guess this year is that fall armyworm pressure has been particularly high because of tropical weather systems/hurricane activity. The moths migrate northward every year, typically reaching the mid-Atlantic in early to mid-September (hence their common name of fall armyworm). This year, the moths arrived as early as we might see them. This is also of importance since it likely increases the number of generations of all armyworms we will likely have this year… normally 2-3, but maybe more than 3 this year? The reason they arrived early is likely linked to the number of named storms that have in some form or fashion either directly or indirectly influenced the mid-Atlantic region weather patterns in 2021. The moths are pushed along in the air streams of these major weather makers; in 2021 Danny, Elsa, and Fred have all had impacts in the mid-Atlantic. It might even be that Henri was a contributor to pushing moths further north and in greater populations than normal. Then there was Ida that tracked through the upper mid-Atlantic and Northeast. Ida almost assuredly brought moths along for the ride. This suggests we are NOT done with fall armyworm pressure for 2021 and that the problem with these pests will likely persist and possibly expand (although likely not as large in numbers as the first waves of the pest).
What else is in play with their numbers this year? The populations grow not from just moths arriving from the south, but those that are here are mating and laying eggs after they have arrived. A single moth can lay between 100-200 eggs at a time (usually on the underside of leaves) and lay up to 1500 eggs in their lifetime. During the summer, the life cycle can be completed in as little as 30 days. So, consider the pure scope of numbers of worms that are possible in this situation, and these numbers for a pest that essentially will feed on almost any type of aboveground plant material, while knowing that lawns, corn, and forage crops are usually favored targets. We have recently added an extension publication about managing fall armyworms in lawns to the VCE educational resources website (www.resources.ext.vt.edu).
Are the fall armyworms only attacking turfgrasses? A quick survey of fall armyworm feeding activity that was conducted by both the Virginia Turfgrass Council and agents with the Virginia Cooperative Extension indicates that fall armyworms have caused significant damage to tall fescue and bermudagrass in turf settings, but also to agricultural plants such as alfalfa, orchardgrass, and millet. In general fall armyworms have avoided crabgrass, sedges, and other broadleaf plants (things like dandelions, plantain etc.) in the lawns. There have been no reports of damage to corn, cotton, ornamental plants or vegetables.
What can be done as treatment? This greatly depends on your situation and the clientele you are serving. Lawn care providers have simply been overwhelmed by the sheer number of problems they encountered this year and there was no way to quickly service all of their clients.
Insecticides recommended for control include most pyrethroids (such as bifenthrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, Mustang Max, Baythroid XL, etc..). Virginia Tech field trials on turfgrasses indicate very good control of larvae with the pyrethroids, which are also one the cheaper insecticide options available. Please note that control of large larvae is sometimes difficult with any insecticide. In surveying Virginia turfgrass managers, almost all that used the product reported that as a rapid, inexpensive, and highly effective knock-down fall armyworm treatment, granular formulations of bifenthrin have done an excellent job. However, these products are very short-lived in duration, and while the bifenthrin addresses the immediate control of the caterpillars, it does very little for long-term (i.e. residual) control if further generations of the insect emerge. The carbamate, Lannate LV, and many of the more selective (lepidopteran-targeting) insecticides such as the diamides (Prevathon, Coragen, Acelepryn, Besiege), or indoxacarb products like Steward, Avaunt eVo, Provaunt, spinosad (trade names of Blackhawk, Tracer, Matchpoint), Radiant, Intrepid Edge, as well as others have strong activity on fall armyworms. Our surveys suggest that many Virginia turf managers that had applied clorantraniloprole (ai in Acelepryn) earlier in the year received very good residual control of fall armyworms. Chlorantraniloprole is a more costly product than any of the pyrethroids, but is an exceptional caterpillar-control product, offers an extended control period, and also serves as a very effective grubicide. Do note that chlorantraniliprole may take 2-3 days to actually kill larvae, but provides immediate feeding cessation, and thus stops damage right away even though the larvae are not dead. And remember that one of our most commonly applied insecticides for late summer grub control in lawns, imidacloprid, is essentially useless as a fall armyworm control product.
Consult the relevant Virginia Cooperative Extension Pest Management Guide for specific recommendations (https://resources.ext.vt.edu). Remember THE LABEL IS THE LAW and labels vary for products, pests, and the plants being treated.
Will the grass recover? Possibly. If the worms have not damaged the crowns (i.e. the growing points) the turfgrass will likely recover, especially with appropriate seasonal nitrogen fertility. The turfgrass recovery should be fairly evident as cooler temperatures and fall rains arrive. If the damage is extreme, regrassing (either by seeding or sodding) will be necessary. At this time, there are no varieties of tall fescue that are proven to be ‘resistant’ to fall armyworm pressure. However, it is always desirable to use the most improved genetics available and those cultivars can be found on the Virginia Turfgrass Variety Recommendation List (www.resources.ext.vt.edu). You can also find publications specifically devoted to lawn establishment and renovation on the website.
The post Virginia Turfgrass Council – Unprecedented Fall Armyworm Pressure in the Mid-Atlantic in 2021 appeared first on The Turf Zone.
Tennessee Turfgrass – Neal Glatt, CSP, ASM
Work can be so hard sometimes. I don’t have to tell you this as nearly every organization is short staffed and desperate for labor to help. But as hard as work can be, it’s got to be even tougher for new hires when impatient customers and nearly impossible deadlines overwhelm even experienced employees. Maybe that’s why they’re quitting so quickly. As managers, we need to make it easier for them.
In fact, before we talk about how to boost retention by creating a better new employee experience, let’s think about all the people who haven’t even applied to our job postings. In a world of job descriptions that are often too long, too boring, and too confusing, we need to rewrite descriptions that introduce our organization’s mission and inspire people to help the team. We need to talk about what’s in store for them beyond pay and benefits that every job offers and focus on the career development and purpose that is unique to each organization. And we need to post our story in a clear, concise, and inviting manner.
One of my colleagues also believes that most organizations make it far too difficult for prospective employees to apply for work. He strives to make it as easy to apply for a job as to order a pizza from Domino’s (if you don’t know you can order in at least 15 different ways: from a voice command on Alexa to posting a pizza emoji on social media). By streamlining applications to the essentials and allowing job seekers to text-to-apply, you can engage people faster and provide a more convenient application process. I like this idea so much that I don’t even have a job application anymore. And we all know most people under 30-years-old hate talking on the phone, so why do hiring managers continue to make job seekers uncomfortable with a phone call to start the process?
When we do manage to hire a candidate, the experience needs to be a smooth ramp up rather than a swift jump into the fray. I believe that leaders need to focus first on building a relationship with their people before they can lead a team toward real production. Without a foundation of trust and opportunities to learn the positional and cultural expectations, success is impossible, and burnout is likely. But how long will it take to build these relationships and integrate someone new into a team?
After considering and testing the time requirement for many years, I believe it takes a full year to expect someone to be working successfully. This doesn’t mean they don’t complete tasks and add value in their first year of employment, but rather that managers need to be intentionally investing in their development at the base level of job performance for a full year to help them stay engaged. A large part of this effort is protecting first year employees from overbearing expectations.
When I propose my one-year theory to most managers, it isn’t met with enthusiasm and excitement. I empathize with their frustration and have worked hard to disprove this idea by onboarding people faster for years. Yet every time I accelerate the expectations it fails, and I find myself trying to rehire for a position (costing a fortune in recruiting, interviewing, and onboarding time and costs). So, I’ve given up attempts to fast track new employees.
The good news is that I have found incredible success in a patient approach of weekly coaching and development. In fact, people produce at basic tasks more reliably than ever and while it takes a year for them to reach their potential, I think that their potential grows immensely during that time. By committing my time and patience to my people, both production and retention skyrocket.
It’s time for managers to change their approach for success. If you want help implementing a better application process or would like to discuss how to better coach your people through onboarding and beyond, I’d be happy to help. Just send me a note at Neal@GrowTheBench.com. When you change your approach, you’ll be amazed at how the outcomes change too.
Neal Glatt is the Managing Partner of GrowTheBench, an online training platform for the green industry. Learn more about him and his solutions at www.NealGlatt.com.
The post Tennessee Turfgrass Association – Let’s Make Work Easier appeared first on The Turf Zone.
New England Blade – Steve LeGros
As sports turf managers there are many challenges we face and many of these are weather related. While working in the Northeast, my biggest challenge was dealing with winter conditions, especially in football season or in early spring with field hockey or baseball.
I have found through trial and error a number of ways to deal with snow on both synthetic and natural grass fields; the most important strategy was to have a plan of attack ahead of time, before Old Man Winter throws multiple inches of snow or ice at you. If you are not prepared, the results will be a lot of lost valuable time in the removing of this frozen precipitation. Establish what the plan of action will be in advance and be sure to factor in the worst-case scenario while also having a Plan B.
Plowing Options
Here are a couple of plowing options that can be used to remove snow on either synthetic or natural grass:
If a rain tarp is available, tarping the surface before the event allows you to remove the snow/ice AS SOON AS IT BEGINS TO FALL. Using high-powered, PTO-driven blowers allows you to prevent as much accumulation on the tarp as possible: this requires being on site as soon as the snow or freezing rain begins to fall and proactively removing the precipitation by working from the center of the field and working your way out to the sidelines.
The snow must be a dry snow for blowers to work. If it’s a wet snow you can remove the snow by using rubber tip snowplows or other snowplow options listed below. Do not allow the snow to accumulate more than one inch before beginning the removal. Also, plowing off the rain tarp makes for a cleaner surface in the end.
CAUTION: When plowing off of the rain tarp, plow in the direction in which the tarp was laid and modifying the plow blade to prevent snagging and tearing the rain tarp.
Plowing an uncovered surface with a pickup truck or utility work vehicle works fine, but you must retrofit the plow blades. Here are some ideas:
Use pressure treated wood/recycled lumber. Hardware needed: long lag bolts, washers, and nuts and one 2 x 4 x 8-inch or 4 x 6 x 8-inch piece of lumber. I remove the snowshoes from the plow (will still be used as the receiver for the pressure treated wood). Take the lumber or whatever you find that will keep the blade from coming in contact with the surface.
On the bottom side of the lumber, recess drill two holes (large enough for the lag bolt head with a washer) in alignment with the plow shoe receivers; the recessed drill hole should be deep enough to allow for a lag bolt head to sit flush with the bottom of the board. Place a support washer at the end of the bolt for reinforcement. Run the lag bolt up through the board and through the snowshoe ring on the back of the plow. Add washers above and below the lag bolt as you would with the snowshoe for spacers and secure bolt with a locking nut.
Another idea is using a drainpipe bucket plow. You need a 15 to 20-foot by 18-inch diameter drainpipe, ratchet straps, and a tractor with bucket. Strapping the drainpipe to the bucket increases the plowing swath; when you plow have the lift bucket up, tilt the bucket forward, lower to turf and plow.
Synthetic Fields
When plowing synthetic fields, you don’t need to scrape the surface clean. If you try, it will result in the removal of crumb rubber and the chance of turf damage. Instead, drop the plow to the surface and then raise it slightly (1/8 to 1/4 inch). Leaving this small amount of snow is what you want to achieve. Synthetic turf heats up so fast that even 1–2 inches of snow will rapidly melt off if there are slightly exposed areas of green turf.
After the majority of snow has been removed, black crumb rubber (synthetic field) or black sand (natural grass) can be spread over the field. Allow this to sit 20–30 minutes and then run a field groomer over this last bit of snow and it will quickly dissolve. I have also seen green dye sprayed over the last one inch of snow that will absorb more sunlight and accelerate the melt.
If only one to two inches of snow has fallen on synthetic turf, I have been able to drive a utility vehicle in a crisscross pattern across the field (like a mowing pattern) to achieve melting; by compressing this little bit of snow in the tire tracks it accelerates the melting.
Snow blowers also work well but remember not to scrape it clean. Leave a 1/4 inch of snow, followed by an application of crumb rubber or black sand.
Don’t be too concerned with plowing against the seams of the synthetic turf. As long as you’re not scraping it clean and take your time, it will be fine. If you try to cowboy plow the removal of the snow and the plow begins to bounce, it could result in extreme turf damage.
If a large amount of snow is called for, get after it as soon as there is an inch of accumulation and keep repeating the removal process throughout the storm.
When the field is scheduled to be used in early spring (March/ April), I recommend you remove the snow after each storm event throughout the winter. Removing all but one inch will prevent a lot of heartache come March. It’s much easier to remove one inch of snow in the spring than to remove three feet of frozen, hard-packed snow.
Snow Removal: Members Weigh In
Earlier this year, NESTMA polled members on their snow clearing practices. The majority indicated that they do clear snow off synthetic fields and those that don’t hold back due to warranty concerns. There was an equal split between those that contract the service out and those who perform snow clearing in-house. Clearing snow with a Snow Pusher Box is the overwhelming choice for sports turf professionals.
Tom Barry, CSFM, heads the NESTMA Network committee. When reviewing the results of this poll he noted, “What was interesting to me was that most folks that clear fields do it on a storm-by-storm basis. At Greens Farms Academy [in Westport, CT] we wait until late February. Primarily because we don’t use the fields over the winter. This has burned us in the past though, because when snow builds up and doesn’t melt off, it can become frozen in layers and is much more difficult to push.”
Planning is Key
Matt Clement, Grounds Manager at Roger Williams University in Providence, RI shares his thoughts on snow removal.
“We have seen an increasing number of synthetic turf fields being installed throughout New England.
This has helped get athletes out on the fields earlier, but it has created another challenge – snow removal. Sports turf managers need to have a plan in place to remove snow from their synthetic turf fields and be prepared for what Mother Nature tosses their way. By being prepared and having a snow removal plan in place using in-house resources, or contracting out snow removal, sports turf managers can provide their teams and coaches a safe, playable field throughout the winter / spring sports season. There are many resources available including specialized plows and companies with expertise in snow removal on synthetic turf.
Snow removal on natural grass athletic fields is probably the most challenging. A few years back, David Mellor, Senior Director of Grounds for the Boston Red Sox, came up with the great idea of applying black sand to snow covered athletic fields. The application of black sand is a safe and sustainable alternative to mechanical snow removal. The application of the black sand can be performed in house or contracted out to contractors that have the right equipment to apply the sand safely and efficiently.”
Steve LeGros has been in the turfgrass industry for more than 30 years as a turfgrass/stadium operations manager and has been consulting with turfgrass management and facilities operations on all levels of athletic fields since 2007. The article originally appeared in Sports Turf magazine and is reprinted with the author’s permission.
The post NESTMA – Snow Removal of Natural and Synthetic Sports Fields appeared first on The Turf Zone.
Tennessee Turfgrass – Larry Tankersley, Extension Forester, University of Tennessee Department of Forestry, Wildlife & Fisheries and Tom Samples, Ph.D., Turfgrass Science & Management, University of Tennessee Department of Plant Sciences
Trees and turfgrasses share the same basic requirements in order to live. Both capture energy from sunlight in order to produce carbon-containing substances that are used immediately to support growth, or can be stored in reserve. Photosynthesis, the combination of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen from carbon dioxide and water in the presence of light results in the formation of glucose and other sugars. Atmospheric carbon dioxide is also the source of carbon in amino acids, proteins, starch and cell walls.
Trees and turfgrasses have vascular systems (xylem and phloem), and rely on water for oxygen and hydrogen, and to move essential nutrients absorbed from the soil to leaves, and sugars produced in the leaves to roots. Fourteen mineral nutrients are essential for their survival and reproduction. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and sulfur are classified as macronutrients due to the quantity of each that is required. Due to the very small amount (usually 100 ppm or less) of each found in plant tissue, the remaining eight essential minerals, chlorine, iron, boron, manganese, zinc, copper, molybdenum and nickel, are referred to as micronutrients.
Local air temperatures, annual rainfall amounts, and soil texture and fertility levels often determine if a particular species or variety of turfgrass or tree will thrive in the landscape. Although trees and turfgrasses growing in close proximity to each other must share resources (Table 1), this does not necessarily mean that they cannot co-exist. Successful management strategies assure that the fundamental requirements of both trees and turfgrasses are being met every year, even though growing conditions for each may be less than ideal.
Table 1. Fundamental Requirements of Trees and Turfgrasses.
| – Shared Resources: | | – Physical space, especially below ground | | – Clean air, especially oxygen and carbon dioxide, free of toxins, above and below ground | | – Sunlight, both enough (duration and intensity) and of the appropriate wavelengths (quality) | | – Water, the right amount delivered on time | | – Seventeen essential nutrients – carbon, hydrogen and oxygen from air and water, and 14 mineral nutrients supplied by the soil | | – Minimum and maximum air and soil temperatures appropriate for growth and survival of both trees and turfgrasses |
Light Intensity, Quality and Duration. The rate at which photosynthesis takes place within a tree or turfgrass usually increases with increasing light intensity. Light intensity is described as the amount of energy, or ‘packets’ of light referred to as photons, hitting the surface of a leaf over some time period. Light stimulates stomates to open. As a result, high light intensities are usually associated with high water transpiration rates. Only an estimated one to two percent of the solar radiation a turfgrass is receiving is absorbed and converted to chemical energy. Most of this absorbed energy is reradiated at much longer wavelengths, resulting in the release of heat. Turfgrass leaves with a horizontal orientation are more efficient absorbers of solar radiation compared to those growing more upright. The surfaces of turfgrass leaves may also reflect solar radiation. Dull and dry leaves are usually less reflective than glossy or wet leaves. Turfgrass leaves may also transmit solar radiation that may be absorbed by other leaves.
In his book “Turfgrass Science and Culture” published in 1973, Michigan State University researcher and author, Dr. James Beard, reported that an estimated 20 to 25% of maintained turfs were receiving some level of shade from trees, shrubs or buildings. The canopy height of bermudagrass plants growing under low light intensities (less than 70 percent full sunlight) often increases by more than 100 percent compared to that of plants receiving full sunlight. Leaf elongation is often about 35 percent higher when cool-season turfgrasses are growing on sites with limited light intensity compared to the same species in full sun. This is believed to be the result of shaded turfgrasses producing more of the plant growth hormone, gibberellic acid. The root-shoot ratio of turfgrasses tends to decrease as the level of shade increases, and less energy reaches the roots. The cuticle, the protective, waxy surface layer of a leaf, often thins as the level of shade increases. This may cause shaded turfgrasses to be more susceptible to injury from drought, freezing temperatures, diseases and insects. Since air movement among plants is often restricted, turfgrasses managed in shade often take longer to dry after rain or irrigation.
In addition to the intensity of light, the overall health and performance of turfs under trees also depends on the quality of light they receive. Photosynthesis cannot occur without an appropriate amount of light of specific wavelengths. The quality of light reaching turfgrasses shaded by trees is often restricted. That is, a portion of the photosynthetically active radiation, or PAR (visible light wavelengths from 380 to 700 nanometers), has been intercepted and filtered by the tree canopy before reaching the leaves of turfgrasses. As sunlight reaches a tree’s canopy, it is 1) absorbed by the leaves and used for photosynthesis, 2) reflected back into the atmosphere or 3) transmitted to plants (turfgrass) below. Transmitted light is less intense and certain wavelengths, especially visible light important for photosynthesis, are filtered by tree leaves. When the tree canopy provides solid shading, turfgrasses receive only indirect light, totally depleted of many of the wavelengths that result in healthy growth. Absorption, reflection and transmittance of light as it passes through a cottonwood (Populus deltoids) tree leaf are presented in Figure 1. Notice that the dotted line or light transmitted below the tree crown, is very low. An alteration of the light spectrum directly affects turfgrass growth. Silicon photovoltaic sensors are used to estimate PAR, while other sensors predict the photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of the PAR. The PPFD is the amount of photosynthetically active photons that are hitting the leaf surface per unit area per unit time. The PPFD is reported as micromoles of photons per square meter per second. These sensors are commonly used by growers to monitor and manage supplemental lighting in greenhouse plant production systems.
The intensity, photosynthetic activity and duration of light that a turf shaded by trees receives is influenced by its location in the landscape, and the size, form and species of trees. The level of shade in areas of a landscape receiving only four to six hours of direct daily sun is considered medium. Dense or ‘heavy’ shade is cast by trees with very dense canopies. Due to their ‘open’ form, pines (Pinus spp.) tend to allow more light to reach the turf surface than shade-tolerant, deciduous trees with ‘thick’ canopies, such as oaks (Quercus spp.), sycamores (Platanus spp.) and maples (Acer spp.).
The time of day that the turf receives direct sunlight also deserves consideration. The ideal time for a turfgrass to be in direct sunlight depends on the optimum temperatures for photosynthesis for the species being managed. More specifically, turf health and performance are dependent on the length of time that plants receive light within the PAR region at an air temperature at or near the optimum for photosynthesis. For example, during hot, dry periods in the summer, cool-season turfgrasses maintained with no irrigation and in areas of the landscape receiving moving shade, most often perform better when shaded in the afternoon, rather than in the morning.
The Turfgrasses. Shade tolerance varies among cool- and warm-season turfgrass species, and varieties within species. The relative shade tolerance of chewings, strong creeping red, hard and sheep fescues is high. Yet, the performance of these cool-season turfgrasses in shade is limited by a general lack of heat tolerance. Perennial ryegrass and Kentucky bluegrass rank low to medium in shade tolerance while tall fescue, the predominant cool-season turfgrass species in Tennessee, generally ranks medium in shade tolerance. Ranking of shade tolerance among warm-season turfgrasses is bermudagrass < centipedegrass and zoysiagrass < St. Augustinegrass. The adaptation of St. Augustinegrass in Tennessee is limited by a lack of cold tolerance. Although, as a species, bermudagrass ranks low in shade tolerance, the variety TifGrand® has demonstrated improved shade tolerance compared to several other sterile hybrid (Cynodon transvaalensis x Cynodon dactylon) varieties. Similarly, several newer, vegetative, clonal-type zoysiagrasses (Zoysia spp.) including ‘Diamond’ (Z. matrella), ‘El Toro (Z. japonica x Z. matrella), ‘Geo’ (Z. japonica x Z. pacifica), ‘Palisades’ (Z. japonica x Z. matrella), ‘Royal’ (Z. japonica x Z. matrella), ‘Zeon’ (Z. japonica x Z. matrella) and ‘Zorro’ (Z. japonica x Z. matrella) have improved shade tolerance compared to ‘Meyer’. Meyer, a variety of Zoysia japonica with good cold tolerance, was released in 1951, and is still being maintained in landscapes throughout the state.
The Shaded Turfgrass Microenvironment. Shading impacts the turfgrass microenvironment in several ways. Daily and seasonal fluctuations in the air temperature of the microenvironment are often reduced.
In the top several inches of soil, trees and turfgrasses compete for water. The first plant species established is generally the most successful absorbing water from the soil since it is the first to occupy limited growing space. A large tree with a well-established root system can often absorb water much better than a recently installed sod. Likewise, established turf will compete very effectively with a recently transplanted tree for available water.
Tree roots are opportunistic and spread well beyond the width of the crown, wherever conditions favor growth and adequate oxygen is present in soils (Figure 2). This is generally in the top one foot of soils. Some tree roots will penetrate the soil to greater depths, depending on the soil texture and bulk density. The majority of tree roots are located in the top few inches of soil. Many fine “absorbing” roots actually grow into mulch or thin turfs. As with turfgrasses, tree roots are often denser on the north (shaded) side of the tree where shade discourages rapid soil drying.
Relative humidity and carbon dioxide levels within a shaded microenvironment are generally higher, and air flow within the turfgrass canopy is often restricted, compared to those in ‘open’ areas of the landscape. When the relative humidity remains high for extended periods of time, and air flow among plants is severely restricted, turfs are generally more susceptible to disease. Due, in part, to a lack of sugars and starches, shaded turfgrasses are often less durable, and may be very slow to recover from injury.
Improving Turfgrass Performance in Shade. An annual review of the landscape management plan followed by adjustments in both tree and turf care can result in better turf quality.
Managing The Trees. The quality and intensity of light reaching turf below isolated trees may be improved with creative pruning (Figure 3). Generally, at least two-thirds of the tree’s total height should contain live branches. Regular pruning of the lower third, and removing drooping branches, is highly recommended to allow sunlight to the turf below. Crown thinning can also be helpful to reduce the crown density and leaf area of the tree allowing more sunlight to move further through the crown (Figure 4).
Another consideration is to plant trees that “naturally” allow more sunlight to pass through. For example, research indicates that maple and black walnut restrict far more radiation than honey locust (Table 2). Trees can also be selected based on shape to reduce the number of drooping branches that intercept light at lower angles. Without maintenance, most of our common trees restrict enough sunlight to stress all but the most shade-tolerant turfgrasses. Instances where tree cover is multi-layered, as in a forest, may preclude the use of any turfgrasses.
| Tree Species | Genus | Transmitted Radiationa | | Hackberry | Celtis | Lowb | | Black walnut | Juglans | Low | | London plane/Sycamore | Platanus | Low | | Yellow poplar | Liriodendron | Low | | Sugar maple | Acer | Low | | White oak | Quercus | Medium | | Northern red oak | Quercus | Medium | | Shagbark hickory | Carya | Medium | | Honey locust | Gleditsia | High | | a Research supported ranking (McPherson, E.G. 1984. Planting design for solar control. In McPhearson, E.D. (ed.) Energy- conserving Site Design. American Society of Landscape Architects. Washington, D.C. b Low transmitted radiation = less light intensity; Medium transmitted radiation = intermediate light intensity; High transmitted radiation = more light intensity. |
Table 2. Radiation Transmitted By Selected Tree Species.
Managing The Turfgrasses. Management considerations for turfs in shade include:
Trees and turf can be managed successfully on the same site as long as managers understand the needs of both types of plants, and their interactions when growing together.
References
Anonymous (Fondriest Staff). 2010. What is Photosynthetically Active Radiation? Aug. 12. Environmental Monitor. Fondriest Environmental, Inc. https://www.fondriest.com/news/photosyntheticradiation.htm
Beard, J.B. Turfgrass: Science and Culture. 1973. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632. 658 pp. ISBN 0- 13-933002- X
McCarty, L.B. Golf Turf Management. 1st Ed. July 9, 2018. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL 33487. 760 pp. ISBN-10: 1138476382. ISBN-13: 978-1138476387.
Turgeon, A.J. Turfgrass Species-Chapter 3 In Turfgrass Management. 5th Ed. 1998. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. SBN 10: 0136283489. ISBN 13: 9780136283485.
The post Tennessee Turfgrass Association – Trees and Turfs appeared first on The Turf Zone.
North Carolina Turfgrass – Bill Carraway, VP of Sales & Marketing, The Turfgrass Group, Inc.
“Under promise and over deliver.” Although I cannot take claim as the originator of this academic discipline, it is absolutely a fundamental imperative by which I operate, when it comes to the introduction of any new product into the marketplace. It was with this theory as our guiding principle that in early 2015 The Turfgrass Group (TTG) launched the release of TifTuf® Certified Bermudagrass. Little did we know that some six years later, our determination to “Under Promise” would ultimately turn out to be one of the greatest understatements ever spoken in the world of turfgrass.
The University of Georgia (UGA) has long held the deferential honor of being recognized as the world’s leading turfgrass breeding program, and as such is revered as the standard by which all other university and privately owned warm season breeding programs are measured. As Scott Angle, the former Dean of the College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences put it, “Much of the past success of our sod and turf industry is a direct result of the many varieties of turfgrass generated at UGA.” He continued, “In business, you’re only as good as your ability to keep ahead of your competitors. In Georgia, our sod growers and turf profes- sionals are fortunate to have a world-class turfgrass program to keep them ahead of our friends and competitors in other states.”
For those of us that view the turfgrass industry through the prism of ‘time served,’ we have had the privilege of growing some superior turfgrass varieties that in certain cases have had profound impacts on our careers as well as our individual farms’ growth and financial success. In some cases, these cultivar influences had run their course in a matter of several growing seasons, but those are not the ones I am attempting to focus on. The ones I am referring to are those rare cornerstone varieties, the industry changers, these are the Transformational Grasses. Can you say Tifway 419?
In 1960 the University of Georgia in cooperation with the USDA released the new interspecific hybrid bermudagrass Tifway 419. Developed by Dr. Glen W. Burton at Tifton, Georgia, this sterile triploid hybrid, now sixty years later, still reigns as the most recognized, utilized, and produced hybrid bermudagrass in the world. The UGA list of improved bermudagrass cultivar releases is lengthy, well known, and unmatched. It is on this platform that turfgrass breeders Drs. Wayne Hanna and Brian Schwartz continue to build and preserve this legacy.
In May of 1993 Dr. Hanna planted over 27,700 bermudagrass crosses he had made in 1992 at Tifton. As a result of continuous observation and evaluation, in 2001 a single selection being tested as DT-1 (drought tolerant number one) was selected because of its ability to maintain quality and green color longer than the other genotypes when under drought stress. With the arrival of Dr. Schwartz in 2009, he began more rigorous scientific testing to better understand Dr. Hanna’s observations. Additional evaluation plots and real-world test sites were established on turf farms and residential properties across Georgia, Texas, and Florida for the purpose of evaluating the selection in a diversity of microclimates.
As the result of a specialty crops grant known as the Specialty Crop Research Initiative (SCRI) which began in 2010, UGA became a part of a multi-university collaborative that would focus on selecting and testing drought-tolerant warm-season turfgrass cultivars. This team included scientists from UGA, the University of Florida, North Carolina State University, Texas A&M University, and Oklahoma State University. With the team of some 32 scientists exchanging plant material and data across such vast environmental conditions, the entire evaluation process was expedited. According to NC State turfgrass breeder Susana Mila-Lewis, “The collaboration among breeders across such different environments is priceless. It helps us to select better lines with more performance stability because they have been tested against a wide range of weather conditions like drought and cold as well as an array of pests and diseases.”
Upon concluding the 2010-2015 SCRI research cycle, the five-university collective determined to release a single bermudagrass cultivar, the University of Georgia’s DT-1. The team’s five-year research initiative had demonstrated a 40% water savings over the leading bermudagrass, without loss of turf quality. It is important to understand that these determinations were based on the removal of all irrigation and or supplemental water inputs. When combining the SCRI results with concurrent ongoing efforts at Tifton, as well as twenty plus years of work done by Drs. Hanna and Schwartz, the university had determined it was time to launch its new release.
Having followed the DT-1 research data for more than a decade, TTG understood that UGA had accumulated a rather lengthy list of suitors, all more than willing to take this grass to market. In addition, based on what research data had continued to corroborate, in terms of drought tolerance and water savings, we were acutely aware that the university had grandiose expectations for this release. Thus, one can only imagine the great sense of adulation felt when it was announced that we had once again been selected to market another UGA release. With the realization that we had just been entrusted with one of those “rare cornerstone varieties,” an “industry changer,” one of those “Transformational Grasses,” it was now time for us to do what we do best, build a production network.
In February of 2015, UGA’s newest release DT-1 was officially named TifTuf® Certified Bermudagrass. Now that our variety had a name, the work done in preparation for our product launch took shape in short order. With plant material sources established, key talking points memorized, armed with over twenty years of research data, our team introduced the turfgrass industry to this grass that would begin to change the face of the American landscape.
Our initial foray into the marketplace was nothing short of extraordinary. We began by approaching the progressive producers and leaders in our industry, many of which were already part of the TTG production network. This group of producers I referred to as “the low hanging fruit” as it took little effort to license them. These producers, like TTG, had been following the DT-1 research and were aware of the ‘value-added’ characteristics that TifTuf® would bring to the marketplace.
Early in the market expansion process, TTG ownership continued to pursue additional marketing opportunities. In early 2016 TTG partnered with Harmony Outdoor Brands, the nation’s top retail sod provider. Through a vast network of sod producers, Harmony provides farm fresh sod to various markets coast to coast, including Home Depot and Lowe’s stores. With our collective networks expanding across the country, a symbiotic relationship began to develop. Today, TifTuf® is the exclusive bermudagrass marketed through both Home Depot and Lowe’s as a Harmony Premium brand.
By mid-summer we had licensed TifTuf® producers in Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Texas, as well as North and South Carolina, with Georgia and the Carolinas being completely licensed out. Though licensing producers in six states might not appear terribly impressive, understanding that TTG’s production licensing program is unique in that we limit the number of producers permitted in each state can make licensing a bit more challenging. Additionally, making certain that we have selected the correct producers to meet market demand while also reaching the various consumer demographics within each state. More importantly, by our limiting the number of producers within a specific geography, we are better able to maintain the genetic integrity of our exclusive varieties, while at the same time protecting our producer’s ROI and product price point.
In addition, TTG is the only licensing program in the U.S. that requires state Crop Improvement Certification for each of our turfgrass releases. It is imperative that both we and our licensees maintain the purity, as stated earlier, of our varieties, thereby making certain that the end-user is receiving the intended variety, thus the desired characteristics purchased. It is also important to point out that TTG is the only U.S. licensing program to field a team of professional turfgrass field inspectors. Above and beyond those inspections conducted by the individual state certification programs, we also inspect every acre of every production field nationwide a minimum of three times each growing season.
By requiring Crop Improvement Certification standards, this also meant that TTG must provide the appropriate ‘Application for Variety Certification’ documentation to each state’s certification office where a producer had been licensed. Although this document exchange and validation process had become quite routine for TTG, a few unanticipated challenges presented themselves.
Until 2015 our experience had been that all certification programs operated from a similar protocol template. What temporarily stymied our progress was the realization that not every certification program even had established certification guidelines and protocols for warm season turfgrass. Thus, there were some brief moments of trepidation due to these enlightenments, but as Winston Churchill once said, “A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” The outcome was that these momentary obstructions provided TTG the opportunity to collaborate with our partners at the Georgia Seed Development Commission (GSDC), fashioning language that has now become the official warm-season Certification Standard for several programs, including California.
As mentioned earlier, we entered the marketplace armed with more research data than any other proprietary turfgrass in history. We understood that TifTuf® was rapidly becoming a household name in some regions. However, not everyone was as enthusiastic and certain consumers remained more than a bit dubious. Even knowing TifTuf® checked all the bermudagrass boxes, we still chose to restrain ourselves from pontificating on every verifiable TifTuf® attribute. Instead, we forced ourselves to “under promise and over deliver”. The rationale was that we would spoon-feed the TifTuf® message slowly to those that might believe that TifTuf® was simply ‘Too Good to Be True’, through an expanded industry conference schedule, more targeted digital and print education and most importantly face to face presentations.
Within a year, our production network had grown to over thirty producers nationwide. We had expanded TifTuf® production into Virginia, Tennessee, Arizona, California, and Hawaii. As our network expanded westward, demand for cost-effective plant material on the other side of the U.S. became a necessity. We determined to establish a TifTuf® Foundation and Registered nursery in the Southwest.
This was accomplished by TTG engaging one of our oldest producer partners Evergreen Turf of Chandler, Arizona and by once again calling on the GSDC. Leveraging their relationship with both the Georgia and California Departments of Agriculture, the GSDC provided the prowess to complete the governmental part of this equation. Through this assemblage of both government and private sector professionals, we established TifTuf® Foundation and Registered fields at Evergreens American Sod Farm facility located in Escondido, California. This marked the first time in UGA and GSDC history that a Foundation plant source field had been permitted and established outside of the state of Georgia.
By 2019, production exceeded 4,000 acres with new fields being planted at a record pace. Demand was exceeding availability in certain markets, while both commercial and residential developments were beginning to specify TifTuf®. As more sports venues continued to jump on the bandwagon, requests to sponsor Sports Turf Managers Association (STMA) became more prevalent. By the end of that calendar year, TTG had turned down over thirty farms nationwide that had requested TifTuf® licenses that were either too close to an existing producer or were in a state that had already been licensed out.
Today over 750,000,000 square feet of TifTuf® has been installed on professional and collegiate sports fields, golf courses, and commercial and residential landscapes across the United States. As a result, in just the past five years, millions of America’s precious water resources have been saved.
To date, TifTuf® production acreage has already surpassed anything that has ever been accomplished with any other licensed proprietary turfgrass in history. Our production network now stands at sixty-five farms strong, producing over 11,000 acres of Certified TifTuf® on over 100 production locations across Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Mississippi, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, California, and Hawaii.
I believe it is safe to say, The Turfgrass Group may have “Under Promised,” but TifTuf® absolutely “Over Delivered.”
The post Turfgrass Council of North Carolina – Under Promise and Over Deliver appeared first on The Turf Zone.
MTC Turf News – Neal Glatt, CSP, ASM
Work can be so hard sometimes. I don’t have to tell you this as nearly every organization is short staffed and desperate for labor to help. But as hard as work can be, it’s got to be even tougher for new hires when impatient customers and nearly impossible deadlines overwhelm even experienced employees. Maybe that’s why they’re quitting so quickly. As managers, we need to make it easier for them.
In fact, before we talk about how to boost retention by creating a better new employee experience, let’s think about all the people who haven’t even applied to our job postings. In a world of job descriptions that are often too long, too boring, and too confusing, we need to rewrite descriptions that introduce our organization’s mission and inspire people to help the team. We need to talk about what’s in store for them beyond pay and benefits that every job offers and focus on the career development and purpose that is unique to each organization. And we need to post our story in a clear, concise, and inviting manner.
One of my colleagues also believes that most organizations make it far too difficult for prospective employees to apply for work. He strives to make it as easy to apply for a job as to order a pizza from Domino’s (if you don’t know you can order in at least 15 different ways: from a voice command on Alexa to posting a pizza emoji on social media). By streamlining applications to the essentials and allowing job seekers to text-to-apply, you can engage people faster and provide a more convenient application process. I like this idea so much that I don’t even have a job application anymore. And we all know most people under 30-years-old hate talking on the phone, so why do hiring managers continue to make job seekers uncomfortable with a phone call to start the process?
When we do manage to hire a candidate, the experience needs to be a smooth ramp up rather than a swift jump into the fray. I believe that leaders need to focus first on building a relationship with their people before they can lead a team toward real production. Without a foundation of trust and opportunities to learn the positional and cultural expectations, success is impossible, and burnout is likely. But how long will it take to build these relationships and integrate someone new into a team?
After considering and testing the time requirement for many years, I believe it takes a full year to expect someone to be working successfully. This doesn’t mean they don’t complete tasks and add value in their first year of employment, but rather that managers need to be intentionally investing in their development at the base level of job performance for a full year to help them stay engaged. A large part of this effort is protecting first year employees from overbearing expectations.
When I propose my one-year theory to most managers, it isn’t met with enthusiasm and excitement. I empathize with their frustration and have worked hard to disprove this idea by onboarding people faster for years. Yet every time I accelerate the expectations it fails, and I find myself trying to rehire for a position (costing a fortune in recruiting, interviewing, and onboarding time and costs). So, I’ve given up attempts to fast track new employees.
The good news is that I have found incredible success in a patient approach of weekly coaching and development. In fact, people produce at basic tasks more reliably than ever and while it takes a year for them to reach their potential, I think that their potential grows immensely during that time. By committing my time and patience to my people, both production and retention skyrocket.
It’s time for managers to change their approach for success. If you want help implementing a better application process or would like to discuss how to better coach your people through onboarding and beyond, I’d be happy to help. Just send me a note at Neal@GrowTheBench.com. When you change your approach, you’ll be amazed at how the outcomes change too.
Neal Glatt is the Managing Partner of GrowTheBench, an online training platform for the green industry. Learn more about him and his solutions at www.NealGlatt.com.
The post Maryland Turfgrass Council – Let’s Make Work Easier appeared first on The Turf Zone.
Alabama Turf Times – Mike Hess
For the last 42 years, Philip Hindman has served the golf community in both sales and as a golf course superintendent. Twenty-four of those years were dedicated to sales which trumped the 18 years spent as a Superintendent. This is surprising because, originally, Philip had no desire whatsoever to pursue a career in sales. Making it more ironic, he was one of the first ever sales reps for Harrell’s outside of the state of Florida.
After he graduated from Mississippi State in 1979 with a degree in landscape architecture, Philip worked at a golf course in his hometown of Louisville, Mississippi, before moving to Arkansas to rebuild a golf course from the ground up. He stayed in Arkansas for the following two years, and then moved to North Port, Alabama where he was the Superintendent of Indian Hills Country Club for 11 years.
Soon after resigning from Indian Hills, Philip began working with a company called Goldkist (which was shortly bought out by Southern States). Philip worked alongside a sales rep named Bob Dyer about 85% of the time. Bob ended up leaving Goldkist to start his own sod farm and asked Philip to take his place as a sales rep. Philip remembers responding, “Bob, I have no desire to be a sales rep.” However, he did step into that role, and little did he know, this would launch a very successful career.
Bob Dyer met Jack Harrell, Jr. at a nursery show in Georgia. At the time, Jack was looking for two sales representatives to be the first expansion out of the state of Florida for Harrell’s. Bob knew that Philip would be a great fit for the other sales position. As Philip recalls, “Bob called me and asked if I was happy at Southern States. I said, ‘Well no, not particularly,’ so he said he would get Jack to call me.” He continued, “In the interview, he said he would need me to come to Lakeland to meet Jack Harrell, Senior. Jack Jr. flew both Bob and I down there, we met Jack Sr. who welcomed us to the Harrell’s family. I’ve been with Harrell’s ever since.”
Philip was hired by Harrell’s in September of 2000 as one of their first two sales reps outside of the state of Florida. “It has been a phenomenal experience with this company, and I couldn’t have asked them for a better experience. The Harrell’s family is a great group of people, and like I tell everyone all the time, I can’t think of another company I’d rather work for. Just good people with integrity.”
Philip said, hands down, the thing which kept him at Harrell’s for his latter 21 years in the industry were the incredible people he worked with, and how the company held all of them in such high regard. “Jack has really surrounded himself with some truly key individuals, that just set the company on the right path. It’s a good, sound company. They put their money where their mouth is and let their faith guide them. It’s incredible to see how they manage the company and how they sup- port their people and truly believe in them.”
Stepping into this new stage of life, Philip plans to do more of what he loves with those he loves. He and his wife will do some traveling, visit their two daughters and spend much more time with their grandbabies, and maybe even go on a few mission trips along the way. He also looks forward to spending more intentional time doing his favorite hobbies, especially hunting. Overall, Philip is overwhelmingly thankful for all the love, support, care, and development he has received over the years from the Harrell’s family, and he is ready for what comes next. “It’s been a great ride, but I’m excited for this new chapter.”
Philip has been a longtime member and supporter of the Alabama Turfgrass Association and a true friend to many in the turfgrass industry, therefore the Board of Directors are very happy to present him the Lifetime Achievement Award. We will miss Philip, but wish him the best in his retirement!
The post Alabama Turfgrass Association – A Career in Review – Philip Hindman appeared first on The Turf Zone.
Mississippi Turfgrass – Neal Glatt, CSP, ASM
Work can be so hard sometimes. I don’t have to tell you this as nearly every organization is short staffed and desperate for labor to help. But as hard as work can be, it’s got to be even tougher for new hires when impatient customers and nearly impossible deadlines overwhelm even experienced employees. Maybe that’s why they’re quitting so quickly. As managers, we need to make it easier for them.
In fact, before we talk about how to boost retention by creating a better new employee experience, let’s think about all the people who haven’t even applied to our job postings. In a world of job descriptions that are often too long, too boring, and too confusing, we need to rewrite descriptions that introduce our organization’s mission and inspire people to help the team. We need to talk about what’s in store for them beyond pay and benefits that every job offers and focus on the career development and purpose that is unique to each organization. And we need to post our story in a clear, concise, and inviting manner.
One of my colleagues also believes that most organizations make it far too difficult for prospective employees to apply for work. He strives to make it as easy to apply for a job as to order a pizza from Domino’s (if you don’t know you can order in at least 15 different ways: from a voice command on Alexa to posting a pizza emoji on social media). By streamlining applications to the essentials and allowing job seekers to text-to-apply, you can engage people faster and provide a more convenient application process. I like this idea so much that I don’t even have a job application anymore. And we all know most people under 30-years-old hate talking on the phone, so why do hiring managers continue to make job seekers uncomfortable with a phone call to start the process?
When we do manage to hire a candidate, the experience needs to be a smooth ramp up rather than a swift jump into the fray. I believe that leaders need to focus first on building a relationship with their people before they can lead a team toward real production. Without a foundation of trust and opportunities to learn the positional and cultural expectations, success is impossible, and burnout is likely. But how long will it take to build these relationships and integrate someone new into a team?
After considering and testing the time requirement for many years, I believe it takes a full year to expect someone to be working successfully. This doesn’t mean they don’t complete tasks and add value in their first year of employment, but rather that managers need to be intentionally investing in their development at the base level of job performance for a full year to help them stay engaged. A large part of this effort is protecting first year employees from overbearing expectations.
When I propose my one-year theory to most managers, it isn’t met with enthusiasm and excitement. I empathize with their frustration and have worked hard to disprove this idea by onboarding people faster for years. Yet every time I accelerate the expectations it fails, and I find myself trying to rehire for a position (costing a fortune in recruiting, interviewing, and onboarding time and costs). So, I’ve given up attempts to fast track new employees.
The good news is that I have found incredible success in a patient approach of weekly coaching and development. In fact, people produce at basic tasks more reliably than ever and while it takes a year for them to reach their potential, I think that their potential grows immensely during that time. By committing my time and patience to my people, both production and retention skyrocket.
It’s time for managers to change their approach for success. If you want help implementing a better application process or would like to discuss how to better coach your people through onboarding and beyond, I’d be happy to help. Just send me a note at Neal@GrowTheBench.com. When you change your approach, you’ll be amazed at how the outcomes change too.
Neal Glatt is the Managing Partner of GrowTheBench, an online training platform for the green industry. Learn more about him and his solutions at www.NealGlatt.com.
The post Mississippi Turfgrass Association – Let’s Make Work Easier appeared first on The Turf Zone.
New England Blade – Pamela Sherratt
Q: I have received two questions about snow mold disease recently: Should we apply a fungicide if we plan on covering the field with a growth blanket this winter and if so, when? And we can’t spray a fungicide before winter for snow mold, but if we see damage from snow mold on our young ryegrass next spring, what should we do?
A: Quick snow mold re-cap: snow mold is a common disease problem in northern states during winter and early spring. Microdochium patch/pink snow mold is probably the most common snow mold that develops during a snow event. In the absence of snow, the disease is referred to as fusarium patch. Typhula blight/gray snow mold is the second most common snow mold. In the case of Typhula blight prolonged snow cover is required for disease development. Perennial ryegrass and annual ryegrass are particularly susceptible to snow mold, especially on immature, lush, succulent stands of grass seeded in the fall. If snow mold has been an issue in the past, it’s wise to be prepared.
The growth blanket will provide environmental conditions not dissimilar to prolonged snow cover, making the turf more susceptible to snow mold. So yes, if you are planning on putting a growth blanket on a field over the winter period it is advisable to apply a preventative fungicide before covering. I assume the reason for covering the field is that there are games scheduled very early in the spring. Growth covers that are permeable (i.e. breathable) are more beneficial than impermeable ones. Impermeable covers increase the temperature and humidity under the cover and so increase the likelihood of snow mold. Making one application of preventative fungicide just before covering the field, or just before the first snow event of the season, has been shown to be more effective than making fungicide applications earlier in the fall. Also, a liquid application is typically more effective than a granular application.
While it is widely accepted that a preventative fungicide is the most effective way to prevent snow mold problems, there are other turf maintenance practices that will help minimize snow mold damage and boost the turf plant going into the winter season. These practices are especially important if there are pesticide restrictions, and a fungicide application can’t be made. There really aren’t any biological options for snow mold prevention or control.
Snow mold issues are exacerbated if the grass is laying over, is covered in leaves, or has excessive thatch. Cultural practices that minimize thatch and surface debris are important, as is mowing just slightly lower than normal during the last mow of the season. The goal is to enter the winter season with a short, clean sward.
A common practice on cool-season turf is to apply a late- season fertilizer application with a quick release source of nitrogen at the end of the growing season, when the grass is still green, but it has stopped growing. This application is not the same as a fall fertilizer application when turf is still growing. Applying quick-release sources of nitrogen in the fall should be avoided as it leads to lush, weak plants going into the winter season. The crucial difference is that the late-season application is made when top/leaf growth has stopped but soil temperatures are still warm enough for nitrogen absorption. The misconception is that the late-season fertilizer application encourages or increases the severity of snow mold disease, but it does not. The late-season fertilizer application will help boost turf quality and green-up the following spring, without excessive top growth. Some care should be taken however, to make sure that the fertilizer application rate is not too high, particularly on sand-based fields, to prevent nitrogen leeching.
Another pre-winter practice could include applications of the plant growth regulator trinexapac-ethyl. Applying trinexapac- ethyl between July and September does not necessarily reduce the incidence of snow mold, but it does increase levels of fructan in the crown of the turf plant, which could improve winter survival and enhance turf quality and green-up the following spring.
Regarding the second question, prolonged rainy periods and cool to moderate temperatures in early spring are ideal conditions to prolong the disease, so it may linger until warmer and dryer weather arrives. A snow mold recovery plan would include: check damaged areas by looking at the crowns to see if they are alive and producing new leaves; lightly rake the grass to promote air circulation and encourage light to penetrate the canopy, encouraging new shoot and leaf development. You want to dry the sward. If there is any dead and/or matted leaf tissue, rake and remove it immediately. In the case of dead turfgrass, renovation of the site would be recommended as soon as possible. Removing diseased and dead material in the spring is an essential part of reducing the source of inoculum on the field. Plan to overseed with turfgrass varieties showing greater genetic resistance to snow mold infection.
Fungicide applications at this time will not eliminate the disease from affected areas but only protect non-infected grass. On high profile-turf an application of fungicide may be warranted.
Pamela Sherratt is a Sports Turf Specialist at the Ohio State University. Connect with Pam at sherratt.1@osu.edu. This article is reprinted with the author’s permission.
The post NESTMA – Snow Mold: Questions Answered appeared first on The Turf Zone.
North Carolina Turfgrass – Neal Glatt, CSP, ASM
Work can be so hard sometimes. I don’t have to tell you this as nearly every organization is short staffed and desperate for labor to help. But as hard as work can be, it’s got to be even tougher for new hires when impatient customers and nearly impossible deadlines overwhelm even experienced employees. Maybe that’s why they’re quitting so quickly. As managers, we need to make it easier for them.
In fact, before we talk about how to boost retention by creating a better new employee experience, let’s think about all the people who haven’t even applied to our job postings. In a world of job descriptions that are often too long, too boring, and too confusing, we need to rewrite descriptions that introduce our organization’s mission and inspire people to help the team. We need to talk about what’s in store for them beyond pay and benefits that every job offers and focus on the career development and purpose that is unique to each organization. And we need to post our story in a clear, concise, and inviting manner.
One of my colleagues also believes that most organizations make it far too difficult for prospective employees to apply for work. He strives to make it as easy to apply for a job as to order a pizza from Domino’s (if you don’t know you can order in at least 15 different ways: from a voice command on Alexa to posting a pizza emoji on social media). By streamlining applications to the essentials and allowing job seekers to text-to-apply, you can engage people faster and provide a more convenient application process. I like this idea so much that I don’t even have a job application anymore. And we all know most people under 30-years-old hate talking on the phone, so why do hiring managers continue to make job seekers uncomfortable with a phone call to start the process?
When we do manage to hire a candidate, the experience needs to be a smooth ramp up rather than a swift jump into the fray. I believe that leaders need to focus first on building a relationship with their people before they can lead a team toward real production. Without a foundation of trust and opportunities to learn the positional and cultural expectations, success is impossible, and burnout is likely. But how long will it take to build these relationships and integrate someone new into a team?
After considering and testing the time requirement for many years, I believe it takes a full year to expect someone to be working successfully. This doesn’t mean they don’t complete tasks and add value in their first year of employment, but rather that managers need to be intentionally investing in their development at the base level of job performance for a full year to help them stay engaged. A large part of this effort is protecting first year employees from overbearing expectations.
When I propose my one-year theory to most managers, it isn’t met with enthusiasm and excitement. I empathize with their frustration and have worked hard to disprove this idea by onboarding people faster for years. Yet every time I accelerate the expectations it fails, and I find myself trying to rehire for a position (costing a fortune in recruiting, interviewing, and onboarding time and costs). So, I’ve given up attempts to fast track new employees.
The good news is that I have found incredible success in a patient approach of weekly coaching and development. In fact, people produce at basic tasks more reliably than ever and while it takes a year for them to reach their potential, I think that their potential grows immensely during that time. By committing my time and patience to my people, both production and retention skyrocket.
It’s time for managers to change their approach for success. If you want help implementing a better application process or would like to discuss how to better coach your people through onboarding and beyond, I’d be happy to help. Just send me a note at Neal@GrowTheBench.com. When you change your approach, you’ll be amazed at how the outcomes change too.
Neal Glatt is the Managing Partner of GrowTheBench, an online training platform for the green industry. Learn more about him and his solutions at www.NealGlatt.com.
The post Turfgrass Council of North Carolina – Let’s Make Work Easier appeared first on The Turf Zone.