The Great Johannes Podcast

View Details

It turns out that people’s sense of race and language develops simultaneously. Meaning, a White American child would expect other White children to speak their language. But if they meet a brown child who speak proper American English, they will prefer the brown child to another White child who can’t speak English well.

Elites, therefore, united behind their shared accents and dialects, usually the language of the power elite. However, rural people cannot unite behind a single language, since they speak wildly different dialects. And so, rural resisters must unite themselves behind race and religion.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In short, Epstein was working for the Rothschilds. He was a basic occultist working for Satanists. Their goal is to use technology to erase human religiousness. The Bill Gates jibby-jab may have been an attempt to chemically erase religiosity in some people. Elites hate Christianity, especially the patriarchal branch, because it guarantees people a free will. And elites rather see people as happy servants, bred to be slaves.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Nearly every Western nation is suffering an aging population, mass immigration, political corruption, an affordable housing crisis, and an anti-White media.

Diversity is called a strength, or has it really been the result of our weakness in other domains?

The Western world initially believed it could relegate Chinese industry into a position of eternal supplier to our needs. Then it appeared that China might win top dog position in the economic hierarchy of national rankings.

In response, Western elites decided that we needed to get India to side with the West, at all cost. But how could we convince the massive population of India to fight with us against China?

This, our ruling classes believed, could be achieved through a massive transfer wealth, namely to buy loyalty. India today is the number one recipient of remittances coming out of the USA.

Remember Christmas 2024 when even Elon Musk started calling white people retarded if they didn’t like the h1b visa scam that was bringing in hundreds of thousands if not millions of Indians into the USA?

His concern must have been that China wasn’t going to need any more Teslas and that Tesla was going to need the Indian market to both sell Tesla cars to and to have them produced there more cheaply.

Perhaps the idea was to get to China and India to compete on price for Western consumer demands.

So we learned that we can never trust our billionaire overclass’ interests because their interests are global and ours are local and national.

The average person living in the West does not live globally but lives nationally at best, and how many people do you know who never even leave their local neighborhood because they work and study and go out in the same nearby streets?

The needs of globalism have become a threat to our national survival. We are no longer investing in rearing children of our own because our foreign policy priorities are that we first house Indian or Somali immigrants for geopolitical reasons.

A part of Somalia called Somaliland, for example, is a piece of real estate necessary for the defense of international trade routes along the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.

And so it seems that the Somali daycare scam in the state of Minnesota under the supervision of former vice presidential candidate Tim waltz is most definitely a dark money scheme to funnel U.S. taxpayer funds to illicit foreign organizations.

Chinese strategists however foresee a totally different outcome. They believe that China will take the number one position as the world’s next only superpower. They believe that the U.S. and India will ultimately be competing against each other for second and third place positions.

If this indeed were the outcome, then the USA will no longer be able to fund the defense of Israel, in which case that piece of real estate will fall into the hands of Arabs backed by China.

No, I don’t support Israel or its regime. And no, I also don’t support China taking over the territory. But if China did take over the Middle East, it would then rule all international trade.

And then, in such a scenario, what is to become of Europe? Already the USA seems incapable of defending Europe under its NATO pact.

Of course Europe shouldn’t have to rely on defenses paid for by the USA. Europe should rather become independent. Europe, today, is importing over 60% of its energy needs from outside of the EU bloc. How can Europe ever be independent? For starters, we could reduce our surplus population.

What I personally foresee is that the economic wealth of the West is going to wither away, that the Western military presence around the world will have to be largely withdrawn, and that we will once again realize that our most precious assets are our own people living on their own land. But there is a serious risk of subjugation by foreign enemies.

Our land will require heavy defenses in the near future, since Europe is surrounded by its Islamic enemies and even the Russian leaders are dreaming of annexing parts of Europe to rebuild the Russian Empire.

Western European people may soon find themselves to be minorities in their own countries ruled by an Islamic shariah law that will not protect their freedoms.

What is required, then, is a spiritual renewal that hardens our souls. The sooner we accept that all has been lost, the sooner we get to start the fight for a better future.

I believe the Western peoples possess a potential to overturn the bleak situation we find ourselves in. Rather than dissolving ourselves in diversity and misery, we should reclaim our throne as rightful heirs and rulers of destiny.

Why, after all, did we start the Industrial Age? Why did we first build the modern world that everyone else now lives in? We did so precisely because we are a people of beginnings.

Once China becomes the world’s only superpower, what will it offer the world? Will China usher in a new age that the world will willingly desire to follow?

The answer to those questions is: absolutely nothing and absolutely not. China is merely a continuation of what the West started. But as we in the West have already found out that modernity and progress are dead ends, Western men will also be the first to find new avenues.

After each dwindling end comes a vigorous new beginning. And that new beginning will be called the Great Age of Western Revival.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Thanks to TikTok’s Daniel Clark (who gets banned often), Johannes (English), and Seth.

Note that Seth isn’t a member of the Vryburger Beweging, but added his comments about New Jersey and the situation in the USA.

We spoke at length about the situation in South Africa, and about how to organize successfully against the “Woke Rainbow” governments. A great insight was delivered by South African Johannes, namely that “normie” White people tend to arrive at the same conclusions once they’ve had the same experiences.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

On a trip to Norway, I nearly died of hypothermia. And I returned with a greater resolve. The story behind my book Atonement for the Shadow.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

What's going on in Poland? And why is it so important for Europe's future?

After the Russian drone mishap across the borders of Poland, the Polish government decided to station 40,000 soldiers at their border with Ukraine.

It sounds like a military advance, but it's really a retreat, for Ukraine has long lost its ability to retake the Eastern Donbass region that has been effectively conquered by the Russian military. And so, Western powers are now focusing on protecting Poland, implying that they can no longer defend Ukraine.

We can't call it a Russian victory, either, because Western taxpayers need to keep believing that the Russians are still losing, so that we keep paying taxes to fund the war effort. Paradoxically, though, the more Europe spends on this war, the less likely we are to win, and that is because of basic economics.

If Europe impoverishes itself by spending its wealth on war, then, even if we win, Europeans won't be able to afford American goods and services anymore, and our economies will become subservient to China.

Chinese investors, for example, have been very busy building warehouses and buying factories, ports, land and other infrastructure in Europe, so that they can sell products made in China directly to European customers, thus circumventing American mercantilists.

Europeans taxed into poverty to pay for NATO would no longer be able to afford to buy from Amazon, but would resort to buying the cheaper goods straight from Chinese e-commerce. Moreover, the recent Trump tariff fallout saw Chinese manufacturers expose on TikTok how they virtually produce most of so-called European brands, and that products designed in Milan, Italy, are really manufactured in China. The difference being a 1000% price markup.

Chinese industry is working very hard to establish itself as both luxury and unbreakable, in response to European consumer accusations that goods from China are fake and flimsy. Regardless of quality, Europeans will expectedly switch to buying Chinese brand as soon as European consumers can no longer afford Western brands. Europe has no believable response to this, except by imposing tariffs.

A wealthy Europe, on the contrary, must remain subservient to American interests, and that means continuous wars for Israel in the Middle East, and continuous wars against Russia, China, and Iran, and possibly against Pakistan and India, too, if not also against Turkey in case of a Turkish break-up with NATO.

Is there no alternative way for Europe to quit being subservient to either East or West, to either China or America?

Yes, there is a way, and I call the solution the Century of Austerity. You see, our problem is overconsumption. It is our economic consumption that has made us so dependent on foreign powers. If we developed ways to reduce our consumption to the minimum, we could figuratively starve off our excess fat, and we could turn to our own people's labor for survival. We might even bring back the gold standard.

We would make ourselves autarkic to a large degree, and trade our labor and intelligence for what we cannot produce ourselves. A century of austerity should make Europe strongly independent of the world, but not isolated. Although American corporations in Europe would go bankrupt, they would be replaced by European family owned businesses, not by Chinese replacements.

And that is my point, namely to keep Europe European, to end the suction effect that our wealth has on immigrants by making Europe a place of hardship but also a place of pride. Through hardship, then, we become stronger, more competent, and more confident men.

Europeans hold their future in their own hands. If we had the leadership to drastically reduce our consumption, to turn away from consumption-based capitalism, from growth-based economics, to make Europe independent again, the world would witness a European revival not seen since the Renaissance.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Never lose your smile! Never surrender!

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In 2012, Dan Kahan et al. developed a test to identify people who are high on individualism and hierarchy. According to his research, 1-in-6 White men are high on individualist and hierarchical preferences. However, the test’s questions were leading, namely, the questions, by design, would only identify certain White men as HI (hierarchy-individualism), and no one else.

Women and non-Whites were practically excluded from scoring on the “wrong end”. I decided to go over the pseudo-scientific test anyway, and discuss questions that nowadays, in 2025, appear to be simply mainstream truths.

A. Egalitarianism-Hierarchy

It seems like the criminals and welfare cheats get all the breaks, while the average citizen picks up the tab.
We have gone too far in pushing equal rights in this country.
Society as a whole has become too soft and feminine.
Nowadays, it seems like there is just as much discrimination against whites as there is against blacks.
It seems like blacks, women, homosexuals and other groups don’t want equal rights, they want special rights just for them.
A lot of problems in our society today come from the decline in the traditional family, where the man works, and the woman stays home.
The women’s rights movement has gone too far.
Discrimination against minorities is still a very serious problem in our society.
It’s old-fashioned and wrong to think that one culture’s set of values is better than any other culture’s way of seeing the world.
We need to dramatically reduce inequalities between the rich and the poor, whites and people of color, and men and women.
Parents should encourage young boys to be more sensitive and less “rough and tough.”
Our society would be better off if the distribution of wealth was more equal.
We live in a sexist society that is fundamentally set up to discriminate against women.

B. Individualism-Solidarism

People who are successful in business have a right to enjoy their wealth as they see fit. If the government spent less time trying to fix everyone’s problems, we’d all be a lot better off.
Government regulations are almost always a waste of everyone’s time and money.
The government interferes far too much in our everyday lives.
Free markets--not government programs--are the best way to supply people with the things they need. Too many people today expect society to do things for them that they should be doing for themselves. It’s a mistake to ask society to help every person in need.
The government should stop telling people how to live their lives.
Private profit is the main motive for hard work.
It’s not the government’s business to try to protect people from themselves.
Society works best when it lets individuals take responsibility for their own lives without telling them what to do. Our government tries to do too many things for too many people. We should just let people take care of themselves. Sometimes government needs to make laws that keep people from hurting themselves.
Government should put limits on the choices individuals can make so they don’t get in the way of what’s good for society.
It’s society’s responsibility to make sure everyone’s basic needs are met.
The government should do more to advance society’s goals, even if that means limiting the freedom and choices of individuals.
People should be able to rely on the government for help when they need it.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Many people, if not most, appear to decide upon their future when they’re fairly young. As teenagers, or perhaps even as children, they envision the life they wish to have, and they begin working toward it, choosing their education, and finding a suitable mate.

Others need more time. They develop a sense of what their lives are about by the time they’re in their twenties, thirties, or forties, and some even later. Few never quite figure out what they were supposed to be doing in life.

But one thing that saddens me to hear is the story of an old man who merely went along with everything going on around him. A man who never once pointed at the horizon to say, “That’s where I’m going.” These men live what I call lost lives, for they often regret their chosen course, or rather, the path chosen for them by others.

Allowing anyone anywhere to determine the outcome of one’s life, of course, is a sin against living. You weren’t put on Earth to be a slave. We’re not paper bags floating away in the wind, wherever destiny takes us. No, destiny, like free will, is something we possess within ourselves.

The downhill skier uses gravity to navigate his way, and so do people use free will to navigate their lives. When it comes to destiny, it becomes a group effort. We cannot shape the future alone, but together with the people to whom we belong, we forge nations. Nations, then, may use destiny as a force to shape their future.

The word ‘nation’ comes from natio and refers to a people of a shared birth. Nationalism is the politics that promotes the right conditions for such a people of a shared birth. Nations flow from the collective racial soul, a primordial river, from which also each family and each individual is an offshoot.

It should come as no surprise that people who call themselves anti-racist or globalist also hate the biological family, for the family represents a branch of the ancestral river that can be traced back all the way to the source. They also hate small towns, for the society of familiar faces allows for individuals to keep in touch with relatives.

No, the globalist warmonger wants to atomize all of us into atomic individuals, lost in a sea of big city madness where inflated egos keep some alive, while others drown. That way, people can be shipped around the world as though they were housed in shipping containers. To each individual his metal box.

This dystopian idea of transporting workers around the world in shipping containers, to take them to wherever in the world their labor is needed, depending on their skill and education, was the topic of a commercial advertising in my home country of the Netherlands years ago. That disturbing fantasy never materialized, but it shows how globalists and their bankers think about you and I. We are just bags of sand to them.

When Martin Luther posted his 95 Theses, he meant to reform Christianity, which was Catholicism, not to fracture it into a thousand new sects. This fragmentation of Christianity soon required state authority to help police sectarian violence. And so the idea of separation of Church and State was born.

The fragmented nature of society now called for tolerance of each other’s viewpoints, and for individual rights. The new individualism led to the capitalist exploitation that forces people to work more hours for increasingly less life. Money became the stand-in for God. Work became a replacement for family. Relentless consumerism, exemplified by attics full of unopened stuff, however, doesn’t make up for the loss of destiny.

We used to live as families. In old Germany, grandparents used to live with their children and grandchildren in the same house. It were the financial experts of the rising cities who, some 200 years ago, figured out they could control a nation’s destiny by selling each couple, if not each individual, a mortgage for a smaller house, then an apartment, then a studio, and then a pod in a place occupied by twenty people, though none of them related to anyone.

From a profiteering perspective, this is the perfect setup. Each individual, powerless and expendable. Each family shattered. Each nation, replaceable by cheaper varieties, like cattle bred for meat and profits for sale at the farmers’ market.

The globalists have won, and the mortgage is famously paid off when you die, when the bank recoups your house, to sell it on to the next sucker. And even if you do pay off your house before death, inflation will make sure the next buyers will still need a bank loan.

Should you pass your wealth on to your children, the state will claim an inheritance tax, and there is now talk of setting the rate at 100%. They’ll say you didn’t work for your parent’s wealth. But neither did the state officials nor the migrants they’re going to give the money to.

You will own nothing, and you won’t even know what happiness is.

Because religion could no longer play a role in worldly affairs, now dominated by capital—or out of a fear of offending someone—a material science emerged that refuses to even look into spiritual matters, for the tools of the scientific trade can only measure what is visible. Everything else—the soul, the will, the conscious mind, the spirit—is dismissed as superstition.

This scientific atheism, combined with the capitalist state that serves only the rich, has now become the State norm. Although the techno-state and its gospel of eternal economic growth was a freak aberration of history produced by a certain minority influence emanating from the Rhineland of West Germany and the Thames in South-East Britain, this system of human exploitation soon became the model for the Asians, the Africans, the Indians, and everyone else.

Very few tribes exist around the world who haven’t made contact with banks and mortgages. When the banks discovered billions of people without bank accounts, they started pushing for financial inclusion, which is really another scam to rob the African of his hut and lease it back to him until death.

Now you know why they push for diversity and multiculturalism. It’s to bring in the unbanked populations who’ll be required to work for mortgages. The banks, then, and their quantitative money printers, have successfully enslaved humanity, and are on the way of reshaping our destiny into the visions of Moloch.

Everyone ended up hurting themselves in the same way we, Europeans and our descendants, hurt ourselves. We destroyed our spiritual lives. We auctioned off our souls to the lowest bidder. We ended up paying for economic growth with our extinction, as the pressures that career life and two-income households put on families meant our birth rates dwindled.

By the end of this century, the same thing will happen to all migrants coming to the West, and to everyone they still leave behind. They, too, have already fallen for the traps of progress. Lured in by the fantasy of easy women and cheap alcohol, what primitive man can hold on to his senses?

The question, for us, is whether we shall find an opportunity to break free from this banking system, and regain control over our destiny, or whether we surrender now and forever, and have ourselves extinguished for matters of economic efficiency?

To find out, we must row ourselves back to the source. For too long have we been looking ahead, toward the future, toward progress, waiting for Utopia to arrive. And we have thus neglected the wisdom of our ancestors, of our past. It is necessary to reconnect with the ancestral soul, and that means to stop looking ahead, hoping that someday things might get better.

No! Things won’t get better! The road to progress is a fluke, it leads to a dead end. Or as one historian noted, “If we do reach the end of this road to progress, then what?”

Then what! Then we’d realize that spending our brief time on Earth living for 2% of annual economic growth was a silly, meaningless exercise to keep ourselves distracted from the things that really matter. We would see that we are not meant to live as termites, allocated to studio flats stacked a hundred stories high. For what is a termite colony to a lion bumbling by?

I am, of course, referring to spiritual imagery. Have you never wondered why lions, these ferocious kings of the food chain, spend most of their time sleeping and dreaming? And why do the gazelles spend most of their hours grazing, hastily, always looking for more? This is the distinction between living a confident life and an insecure life, between a spiritually driven life, and a life driven by greed.

Notice, then, that the lion remains independent. He doesn’t join the hyenas or the prairie dogs for greater profits. He knows what he is and that he is separate from all others. His pride lands are not the dumping grounds for the world’s unwanted and unloved, nor for the poor and the hungry, but for the willing and the brave alone. And unlike bankers, lions don’t hunt their prey to extinction.

We, people of Europe and our offshoots, have had the life essence squeezed out of us by a global banking system that still devours humankind. Against this, we make our stand.

I foresee a United Europe guided by a single diplomatic mission, supported by our many dozens of nations and hundreds of ethnic groups.

Namely, that we shall say no to Eurabia. We will not submit to Islam.

We say no to Eurasia. We will not submit to Russia.

We say no to Eurafrica. We will not mix with Africans.

We say no to Atlanticism. We will not take orders from Wall Street.

We say yes to a Europe for Europeans who shall wrestle themselves free from all technocratic constraints. We shall do away with the central banking schemes that keep our peoples captives of foolish dreams of progress that never materialize.

Since politics can never unite us, we must unite ourselves under the spiritual banner of a single interpretation of Christianity, namely the one that supports and recognizes our ethnicity, our ancestry, and our many nations. Under a single diplomatic mission, we can then do away with the vote.

To achieve our goal, it will be necessary to build a new leadership cadre, to promote a new fighting nobility willing to win wars for their peoples.

If technocratic bankers built a dam to harness our energy, our ancestral river has now swelled to the point we can breach the dam. Soon, our unchained and unrelenting force shall restore the natural order. We shall put ourselves back in charge.

Our destiny is not determined by monthly payments. We are people, not policies. May our force flood the world like a deluge, and produce vigorous, superior offspring around every corner of the world.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

The Bible speaks of angels, and they all come from heaven, whereas demons come from inner Earth, from Hell. Hollywood movies, however, have brought the idea of an outer space to the big screen cinema. And with it came the aliens of Star Trek, and Star Wars’ creatures.

It’s only been since around the 17th century that Western audiences started believing in a thing called “outer space”, as first proposed in the novel Paradise Lost (1667) by John Milton. The actual phrase “outer space” didn’t appear until 1845, in Alexander von Humboldt’s writings, the German geographer and naturalist.

Up until the Industrial Age, heaven and earth had been all that ordinary people cared to know about. Scientists then expanded our little world into the vastness of space, with a diameter of 93 billion light years. But what if aliens, nowadays, aren’t going to come from space anymore, but from alternate dimensions, here on Earth?

Interdimensional Aliens

So, a while ago, I was taking notes when American political pundit Tucker Carlson mentioned, in a conversation with conspiracy peddler Alex Jones, that there are now “interdimensional beings”. They say these creatures have always been here, that they’re affecting us.

The CIA apparently no longer wants us to believe in ordinary aliens. There’s the other fringe theory by Isaac Weishaupt in his 2016 book The Star Wars Conspiracy. It says that Hollywood has been trying to prepare audiences worldwide for the arrival of actual demons, but disguised as aliens.

You could see that idea already somewhat implemented in the 1989 movie The Abyss by director James Cameron. That movie tells about deepwater divers who descend into oceanvalleys. They encounter beings that look like three-fingered, winged angels. Except, they’re not from heaven, and not in air. They’re from the depths of the oceans, underwater.

Do you see what Hollywood has done here? They inverted the Bible. Take the Bible but turn everything right on its head: Instead of angels coming down from heaven, they now come up from the Earth’s depths, i.e., from Hell. Why would Hollywood screenwriters care to mess with people’s idea of heavenly angels?

Indeed, the whole Hollywood “aliens” special, whether from outer space or other dimensions, served to distract Christians from their belief in angels and saints.

Many European people will have heard of a site, often mentioned in Christian folklore, usually a cave of sorts, where one or the other Saint was supposed to have appeared before growing crowds. Notably, there are the popular pilgrimage sites in France, at Fatima and at Lourdes, where the Holy Mary herself is said to have appeared, repeatedly.

Whether these appearances were real, or rather the work of priestly light and magic, is its own matter. Smoke and mirrors can be used to produce ghostly images, even before the age of electricity and cinema. The method called Pepper’s Ghost, for example, creates otherworldly holograms. Pepper's Ghost “is an illusion that uses angled glass or plastic to create a three-dimensional image by reflecting a hidden scene.”

The Priests of Cinema

The arrival of cinema changed everything. A cinema is itself a representation of Greek philosopher Plato’s cave, from his famous cave analogy. Cinema goers are like Plato’s prisoners, tightly locked in their seats in front of a screen that only displays reflections of reality, coming from the lights behind them, but not real reality. When we exit the cinema, we return to the real world and win the possibility of reflecting upon the reflections shown to us.

One might even call Europe’s church organs the predecessors to Dolby Surround Sound. Though, I’d say the bone-cracking bass sounds of a church organ still impress people more, filling a church with the intense crescendos that now make up the climaxes of Hollywood film scores. When we say people quit going to church, we should really say they started going to the cinema instead.

The priests of cinema are its screenwriters. And as we all know, these screenwriters belong to a certain guild that might not serve the interests of Christian moviegoers. And, notice how everything is always in reverse. Though in our year of 2025 AD, filled with poor screenwriting and casting, overused political messaging has made cinema so bad that, perhaps, young people are ready to head back to church.

So did Hollywood consciously, or under the influence of certain occultists, set out to normalize demonic-looking aliens, such as from the Star Wars cantina, so that we might fall in love with them? And doesn’t that imply that the whole concept of diversity is equally demonic? I suppose we should learn to mate with demons, too.

Was this science fiction all a plot to make people forget about Heaven, to replace the brightness of heaven’s lights with the blackness of space? Again, do you see how they’ve inverted the Biblical stories? They’ve made the heavens black as the night.

You have to appreciate the implication of this: It would mean that no one "up top" in the Western media hierarchy, no one in power, really believes in extraterrestrial life. They all know it’s fake. Because they faked it! Our cultural screenwriters are merely trying to manifest aliens into existence as stand-ins for demons (i.e., negative spirits), and to mock Christianity, to make people forget about angels and Saints (who are positive spirits).

It also says that the power of Christianity is still so strong that it needs to be mocked in our year 2025. For if Christianity, its core ideas, and its morality, had been so weak, there would have been no need to so incessantly attack this religion, over and over again, in nearly every Hollywood production. It tells us that there lies a strength within Christianity that our Hollywood screenwriters guild still deeply fears.

And lastly, it suggests that the attacks are running out of steam. Christianity is prevailing. Several outlets have noted over the past years that Christianity is making a comeback, and that young men, looking for a cure to their porn addictions, are escaping to Catholicism, even turning into Catholic Fascists, such as one YouTuber who goes by the handle Pinesap.

The Roswell UFO Story

Personally, I remember how I was once propagandized, as a teenager, to believe in aliens. During the 1990s, they sold us the Roswell alien landing story. The alleged leaked footage showed funny-looking gray aliens on an operating table. One of them was still supposed to be alive.

It was, of course, a rich billionaires’ prank pulled on Western audiences. I say Western, because really no one outside the English-speaking political sphere was paying any attention. They didn’t believe in any of it, and didn’t care. But our TV shows hyped it up to be a real thing. The flying saucers had landed. Where is your God now?

People, including myself, dreamed of storming this site called Area 51, to find out about the truth. Some guys actually did storm Area 51. In reality, likely, Area 51 was a secret military facility where the Department of Defense reverse engineered foreign equipment, from Russia or China. Others on the fringes may say that Area 51 is where director Stanley Kubrik recorded the fake Moon landings.

Interestingly, a list of global UFO sightings shows that most UFO sightings took place in the USA, Canada, Britain, The Netherlands, and Northern Belgium, but are nearly completely absent in Southern Belgium, France, Germany, Mexico, and the rest of the world.

The explanation is that Hollywood movies and TV series about aliens have been most aggressively pushed in precisely the listed Anglo-sphere regions, including the Netherlands and Northern Belgium, which receive subtitled shows from the USA and Britain, but not Germany, which, for a long time, had its own TV shows in German.

So, Germans never fell for the aliens from outer space, but English-speaking people did. People counter my argument by saying aliens would naturally want to visit only the most advanced societies. This is ridiculous, because Germany was the most advanced society for a long time. And Germans, by far, aren’t believers in aliens.

By this logic, Germany and Japan weren’t advanced enough, apparently, and neither is modern-day China, to invite aliens from outer space. My reasoning is better. Namely, Germany and France are more Catholic Christian than the Anglo-world, and Japan is atheist. These cultures would not be too interested in stories of aliens as stand-ins for angels.

Referring to the South Park cartoon series, the phenomena of aliens probing Cartman’s behind is a strictly American fantasy with a very limited appeal to non-American populations. Anal probing appears to be a peculiar African American influence on Anglo-American culture, since black Africans practice it up to six times as often as Europeans do in the heterosexual bedroom.

And notice that UFOs, unidentified flying objects, have been renamed recently to UAPs, unidentified anomalous phenomena. This switch from UFOs, i.e., spaceships, to UAPs, i.e., including interdimensional disturbances, follows Tucker Carlson’s aforementioned plot twist.

Why Interdimensionals?

It brings me to this question: If our overlords were first trying to make us believe in aliens from outer space, why would they now want us to believe in interdimensionals? By the way, interdimensionals already appeared on the big screen in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

So what’s the reason? Could it be that David Grush’s so-called UFO whistleblower claims back in 2023 fell on flat ears, because people, still affected by the Covid era, couldn’t care less about some alien invasion, or might even welcome it.

Grush, a former U.S. Air Force member, claimed, among others, that the Pentagon was secretly reverse-engineering alien materials retrieved from alien aircraft, even studying the pilots’ corpses. Basically, the old Roswell Area 51 story refurbished, and retold to a modern audience. I fell for it once, but won’t fall for it again. And then the narrative was dropped, in favor of interdimensionals.

What I think is going on is that some very wealthy American elites, with ties to the occult movements of Alistair Crowley or the theosophic societies of Helena Blavatsky, were indeed prepping Western audiences to accept the idea of demons from outer space, but disguised as alien pilots.

They switched to interdimensionals to renew interest in their scam, while preserving the possibility to, at a later date, present global audiences with demonic-looking creatures from alternate dimensions.

Would these occultists want us to hear their creatures speak to use? Would they tell us about fantastical new ideas?

Anti-Christian Aliens

I can tell you right now that if, and when, certain occult groups manage to sell their demonic creatures to us, with the help of AI or other techniques, the alien demons will all be unsurprisingly anti-Christian, promoting the beliefs in polyamory, same-sex marriage, transgender dinosaurs, and the theory of evolution leading to multiple genders (and that we’re all one race, the cosmic race) while denouncing conservatism and traditionalism as backwards.

It’s a joke. It’s all a joke. There are no aliens from outer space, and there is no life outside of Earth. It’s all part of an elaborate prank pulled by occultist elites and their billionaire friends. They find it hilarious to make us forget about angels and Saints, and get us to fall in love with the blue creatures from planet Pandora, as in James Cameron’s Avatar.

The name Pandora refers to a European tale about a Greek woman named Pandora. She is left a box that her husband tells her never to open. She opens it anyway and releases demonic spirits into the world.

What did director Cameron mean by this?

It won’t surprise me if, one day, the interdimensionals are revealed, they will look like polyamorous transsexuals. But I doubt Christians will believe a word of what these creatures have to say.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Radical leftist students sometimes occupy a university building, then refuse to leave. Or they glue their hands to a road in order to stop traffic. It’s their way of making a statement against this or that societal phenomenon that they perceive as fascist or bourgeois, etc. Such as people trying to get to work on time.

But these and many other radical leftist tactics come from a single author. His name was Gene Sharp. In his book From Dictatorship to Democracy, Sharp listed around 200 nonviolent methods that radical leftists still use today in order to sabotage our society. Or rather, in order to sabotage the white middle class, which they deem the source of all colonial evil.

I know that Gene Sharp wasn’t really a radical leftist. He was working with the CIA to help overthrow foreign regimes. But his methods were used succesfully to do so. And have you noticed how Western leftists today still use these methods to delegitimize the right, and to sabotage what is good? That’s why we are going to counteract this sabotage by using the left’s methods against hem, putting ourselves back in power.

Sharp came to his methods by studying historical revolutions. He discovered that nonviolent revolutions had greater chances of success. And this is what we also want to achieve: to play to win. While some successful revolutions were violent, most of the successful ones were not.

The idea of nonviolent revolution is that you can enlist grandmas and their grandchildren, whereas violent revolution exclusively attracts young males. Numbers-wise, through, it makes sense to include the aging White boomer generations of the West in the upcoming revolt for our survival.

Instead of fighting the enemy head-on, we should focus on taking away their speech. We should smear their character, and publicly mock our opponents. These tactics, of course, are precisely the sort that we, on the right, have fallen victim to for too long.

It’s time to return the favor. We can use the methods of the left against them, and so, pave the way to further our ethnonationalist resolve.

The Ten Commandments of the Right

Before I go over Gene Sharp’s many methods, I’ll first give you our Ten Commandments. This is a list of attitudes originally developed by another radical leftist, namely Saul Alinsky, once a favorite of Hillary Clinton, who wrote a book titled Rules for Radicals. In that book, Alinsky fantasized about overthrowing the White middle class, because that’s where he believed the power and the wealth was.

I edited Alinsky’s rules for radicals into the Ten Commandments of the Right, as follows:

1. Intimidate the enemy. Make the enemy think you have more power than you really have.

2. Use what’s familiar. Build future action based on past experiences. People can only understand new things in terms of old things. The same is true for political action. If you venture too far from your people’s experiences, you will confuse them and the mission will fail.

3. Confuse the enemy. By doing things the enemy has never experienced before, you will confuse them.

4. Tirelessly ridicule the enemy and point out their flaws. Conservatives all too often try to reason with their opponents. We come up with facts and arguments to try to convince the left. But the leftist enemy thinks like a toddler. They aren’t interested in words. They only understand force. By ridiculing the enemy, we undermine their resolve.

5. Keep reinventing yourself and your tactics. When Hitler threatened to invade France, the French built their defenses on the same spot they had fought the First World War. Hitler surprised the French by simply ordering his troops to take a detour around the French defenses.

6. Threaten the enemy with the force you possess. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.

7. Bend the truth. Use anything the enemy says to your advantage.

8. Act first and provoke the enemy.By forcing the enemy to respond to our initiative, we put ourselves in charge of the situation.

9. Prepare yourself. Work through different scenarios in order to thwart the enemy’s plans. The point is that we need to know what our next moves are going to be.

10. Blame highly visible targets for complex problems. Mass immigration is a complex problem. By blaming, say, Kamala Harris for it, you make her a target. It doesn’t even matter if it’s true or not. By repeating the accusation, it becomes the truth.

Now let’s move on to Gene Sharp’s methods of nonviolent revolution. I have reworked his original 198 methods into a list of methods that I believe are conducive to our ethonationalist cause.

Note 1. A lot of these and similar methods can nowadays be performed as skits on TikTok or other video platforms. Such videos could go viral easily, making a mockery of our entire political caste. We should, in any case, record most of our actions and get our videos to go viral online. We are going to meme ourselves back into power.

Note 2. Before trying any method of protest, check with local laws to see what is or isn’t legal nowadays! I am not advocating illegal or violent action, rather the opposite: nonviolent, legal action!

I. Protest and Persuasion

a. Formal Statements

Public Speeches
Letters of opposition or support
Declarations by organizations and institutions
Signed public statements
Declarations of indictment and intention
Group or mass petitions

b. Communications with a Wider Audience

Slogans, caricatures, and symbols
Banners, posters, and displayed communications
Leaflets, pamphlets, and books
Newspapers and journals
Records, radio, and television
Skywriting and earthwriting

c. Group Representations

Deputations, i.e., sending a group of delegates to attend formal events.
Mock awards, i.e., awarding Kamal Harris the reward for worst politician.
Group lobbying
Picketing
Mock elections, or rather: making a mockery of elections, by showing that the Uniparty always wins no matter who we vote for.

d. Symbolic Public Acts

Displays of flags and symbolic colors (This is why they have the pride flag waving everywhere. It is meant to demoralize people.)
Wearing of symbols
Prayer and worship (Now you can guess why police everywhere in the West have started arresting Christian street preachers.)
Delivering symbolic objects (For example, by handing over a miniature replica of the White House to someone dressed up as an Orthodox Jew. Indeed, such activities can nowadays be performed as skits on TikTok or other social video platforms.)
Dress-ups, i.e., workers going to work dressed in formal evening attire, to show the leadership that they deserve better treatment.
Fixing broken public architecture, removing grafitti, cleaning streets, etc. in places that have been neglected by the authorities.
Symbolic lights, images, and messages projected onto walls. Although, in The Netherlands, a man was convicted to 6 months in prison for projecting the message White Lives Matter onto the Erasmus Bridge. A better way to deal with this may be to project the question, Do White lives matter? or, more radically, state that White Lives Don’t Matter.
Displays of portraits: Put up public portraits of our ancestral heroes, our war generals, our historic leaders.
Paint as protest: The way that Banksy spreads his communist message with grafitti, our artists can easily counter-protest by putting up clever grafitti messages such as: “Your children will hate you”.
New signs and names: Remember when leftists change street names into some incomprehebsible ooga-booha language? We can return them the favor by changing Main Street signs into White Heritage Streets.
Symbolic sounds: For example, playing zoo sounds from a portable speaker system upon the arrival of migrants to asylum centers.
Symbolic reclamations: When they say we are living on stolen land, we symbolically reconquer it again, to reassert our dominion. Once again, a lot of the stunts can be performed as skits on TikTok etc.
Rude gestures: Nowadays, we can get arrested for gesticulating at the police, but what if we simply turned our backs to them?

e. Pressures on Individuals

“Haunting” officials: This is a method of following public officials around, without getting too close or interfering with them. Leftist journalists often use this tactict by following.
Taunting officials: To provoke someone in an insulting or contemptuous manner. For example, by dressing a man up as a woman and asking the President of France if he’ll marry him.
Fraternization (Trying to befriend the enemy as a way of pestering them).
Vigils, for example around important pro-White landmarks, statues of our heroes, etc.

f. Drama and Music

Humorous skits and pranks
Performances of plays and music: For example, re-enacting the conquest of the Americas by Europeans, but unapologetically, by depicting the enemy as unworthy of the territory.
Singing illegal songs in public such as Rhodesians Never Die by Clem Tolet.

g. Processions

Marches
Parades
Religious processions: In many Southern European countries, they have elaborate religious processions, and it may be useful to import these into Northern Europe and the Americas as well. See especially the power of procession from the 1982 movie Cavalleria Rusticana by Italian director Zeffirelli.
Pilgrimages: The Christian piligrimage to Jerusalem deserves a revival, if not to reclaim Jerusalem as belonging to the Christian world of Europe, and not to the world of Zionist Jews. Pilgrimages can be completed anywhere in the world, of course, perhaps ending the erection of a simple cross on a beach and burning one’s old clothes. Again, such events should be mass broadcast to social media and video platforms. Turn your ordinary hiking triping into a spiritually cleansing pilgrimage.
Motorcades

h. Honoring the Dead

Political mourning: Mourn the deceased heroes of the West: our soldiers, our generals, our leaders, all those who once felt no shame to fight for their people.
Mock funerals: We bury Leftism, for example, as personified by Ronald McDonald, the corporate clown.
Demonstrative funerals: When one of our girls has been raped and killed by yet another foreign clan, a million men should show up to her funeral. As in a display of power, a warning to the enemy.
Homage at burial places: Wherever ours have fallen, we start leaving behind flags and flowers. The recent surge in white flags with red crosses in Britain is an excellent strat.

i. Public Assemblies

Assemblies of protest or support
Protest meetings
Camouflaged meetings of protest
Teach-ins: I.e., informative lectures to educate our right-wingers who normally don’t read books (but whose ears are still fine).

j. Withdrawal and Renunciation

Walk-outs: Visit a far-left event, then ostentatiously walk out when talks start.
Silence: Refuse to participate in activities that harm our people, such as, if you’re forced to attend a diversity training for fear of losing your job, the least you can do is to remain silent and withdraw from the activity.
Renouncing honors: If you’ve been given some kind of award by an institituion that doesn’t support our people, them symbolically destroy it or dispose of it. Another perfect activity for a viral TikTok video.
Turning one’s back to people who don’t support us.

II. Methods of Noncooperation

a. Ostracism of Persons

Social boycott
Selective social boycott
Lysistratic nonaction, i.e., the famous sex strike, except by reversing the roles and having right-wing men state on TikTok they now refuse to sleep with leftist women. Ultimately, it’s just a silly threat, but it might reach the headlines of the New York Times.
Excommunication: Remove people from your social circles if they’ve made treasonous statements, or if they serve Israel instead of our own countries.
Interdict: Ban certain groups or people from participation in your circles.

b. Ignoring Social Events, Customs, and Institutions

Suspension of social and sports activities
Boycott of social affairs
Student strike
Social disobedience
Withdrawal from social institutions

c. Withdrawal from the Social System

Stay-at-home: Don’t attend your diversity training. Just say you did.
Total personal noncooperation: Refuse to cooperate
“Flight” of workers
Sanctuary; It is the idea of safe spaces for people seeking to withdraw themselves from power and authority they disagree with. For us right-wingers, we could demand “Christian sanctuaries” in increasingly non-Christian schools and so on, referring to our rights as minorities.
Collective disappearance: The idea is rather to make large groups of people invisible as a form of protest.
Protest emigration (hijrat): It’s like walking out, except we make plans to leave our region or country entirely, as a way of showing authorities that they no longer serve our needs and interests.

III. Economic Boycotts

a. Actions by Consumers

Consumers’ boycott
Nonconsumption of boycotted goods: Refuse to eat the halal food
Policy of austerity
Rent withholding: This used to be a powerful strategy in the Dutch city of Rotterdam during the 1970s. People would pay rent into a foundation they set up together, but wouldn’t send the funds on to the landlords, thus forcing the landlords to fix major housing issues first.
Refusal to rent: This is a situation we can all too well understand nowadays. Just look at the number of people moving into van life, or setting up off the grid housing, just to get away from the usual system of high rents.
National consumers’ boycott
International consumers’ boycott

b. Action by Workers and Producers

Workmen’s boycott
Producers’ boycott

c. Action by Middlemen

Suppliers’ and handlers’ boycott

d. Action by Owners and Management

Traders’ boycott
Refusal to let or sell property
Lockout, i.e., locking workers out of their factories
Refusal of industrial assistance
Merchants’ “general strike”

e. Action by Holders of Financial Resources

Withdrawal of bank deposits (though calling for bank runs is nowadays illegal).
Refusal to pay fees, dues, and assessments
Refusal to pay debts or interest
Severance of funds and credit
Revenue refusal
Refusal of a government’s money

f. Action by Governments

Domestic embargo, i.e., restrictions on trade with unfavorable regimes.
Blacklisting of traders
International sellers’ embargo
International buyers’ embargo
International trade embargo

IV. Strikes

Here, Gene Sharp included a whole section on strikes, i.e., the refusal to work. I’m not sure about this tactic. Might it be better to do the opposite, i.e., instead of striking, we start solving cetrain problems in the boss’s time, showing the bureaucats in charge that solutions are actualy easy to implement, if we’d only just go ahead with them?

This may require some more thought. But it would be a powerful statement to start fixing all sorts of minor problems in our public domain, by ignoring official planning.

[…]

V. Political Sabotage

a. Rejection of Authority

Withholding or withdrawal of allegiance
Refusal of public support
Literature and speeches advocating resistance

b. Citizens’ Noncooperation with Government

Boycott of legislative bodies
Boycott of elections
Boycott of government employment and positions
Boycott of government depts., agencies, and other bodies
Withdrawal from government educational institutions
Boycott of government-supported organizations
Refusal of assistance to enforcement agents
Removal of own signs and placemarks
Refusal to accept appointed officials
Refusal to dissolve existing institutions

c. Citizens’ Alternatives to Obedience

Reluctant and slow compliance
Nonobedience in absence of direct supervision
Popular nonobedience (not doing what you’re told)
Disguised disobedience (going against what you’re told)
Refusal of an assemblage or meeting to disperse
Sitdown—Leftist love sitdowns, to block traffic or to occupy a university building. Perhaps we can give this a right-wing twist.
Noncooperation with conscription and deportation
Hiding, escape, and false identities
Civil disobedience of “illegitimate” laws

d. Action by Government Personnel

Selective refusal of assistance by government aides
Blocking of lines of command and information
Stalling and obstruction
General administrative noncooperation
Judicial noncooperation
Deliberate inefficiency and selective noncooperation by enforcement agents.
Mutiny

e. Domestic Governmental Action

Quasi-legal evasions and delays
Noncooperation by constituent governmental units

f. International Governmental Action

Changes in diplomatic and other representations
Delay and cancellation of diplomatic events
Withholding of diplomatic recognition
Severance of diplomatic relations
Withdrawal from international organizations
Refusal of membership in international bodies
Expulsion from international organizations

VI. Nonviolent Intervention

a. Psychological Intervention

Self-exposure to the elements? Or rather: Building shelter for homeless White people.
The fast?—Instead of fasting, we should bulk up, grow muscle, go to the gym. Let’s not engage in these sort of tactics that harm our physical and mental wellbeing, but rather engage in what strengthens us.
Reverse trial: When you appear before a court, turn the day around by putting forth arguments that indict that judges and the court system, or the society as a whole.
Nonviolent harassment

b. Physical Intervention

Here, Sharp lists many ways of physically obstructing matters. Which may or may not be a good idea, depending on what’s being obstructed.

c. Social Intervention

Establishing new social patterns
Overloading of facilities
Stall-in, i.e. deliberately running out of gas
Speak-in, Go to leftist events by posing as a leftist speaker, and then speaking your opinions anyway.
Guerrilla theater: Spontaneous public performance that nowadays can be spread far an wide via social media.
Alternative social institutions
Alternative communication system: Yes, we need our own new tools for secrecy, for example.

d. Economic Intervention

Reverse strike
Stay-in strike
Nonviolent land seizure
Defiance of blockades
Politically motivated counterfeiting
Preclusive purchasing
Seizure of assets
Dumping
Selective patronage
Alternative markets
Alternative transportation systems
Alternative economic institutions

e. Political Intervention

Overloading of administrative systems
Disclosing identities of secret agents
Seeking imprisonment
Civil disobedience of “neutral” laws
Work-on without collaboration
Dual sovereignty and parallel government

f. Fake Crowdfunds

Raise money from concerned leftists but funnel the money toward right-wining causes. Not by doing anything illegal but by using obfuscated language that leftists might misinterpret.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

According to U.S. Secretary of Commerce (((Howard Lutnick))), the EU is going to open up its market to U.S. companies. As if we don't already have plenty of McEyeSores at every corner of our streets.

No, it's not enough to economically colonize Europe. The historic U.S.-EU Framework Agreement on Reciprocal, Fair, and Balanced Trade is none of the above. It isn't reciprocal, since Europeans will be forced to buy American. It isn't fair, since Europe will foot the bill. It isn't balanced, since it will only hurt Europe economically.

What this is, is the ritual economic sacrifice of the European peoples. In particular, our middle classes must cough up funds to keep the dying U.S. Empire alive just a little longer.

A lot of the wealth about to be transferred from Europe to the USA, however, will end up in Israel. Not to pay for Israel's defenses, but rather to pay for the construction of Greater Israel. Gaza was just the start. Now our money is needed to capture additional Arab territories. It will also house the displaced Arabs elsewhere at our expense.

This fake deal—or rather, suicide pact—with the US means we'll have to drive European farmers out of business. That way, American farmers can increase their profits at the European people's expense.

This is why, for example, Dutch meat and dairy farmers have come under such brutal attacks from their own government. The Dutch are the largest meat exporter in the European Union. However, to increase American ranchers' profits, we are going to force Europeans to buy American-bred meat.

Now, you can guess why Britain wants to impose such cruel inheritance taxes on family farms. To drive them out of business, so that their American counterparts can capture the British market. And to convert Britain's pastures into solar and wind farms. The same is about to happen to Europe's fishermen. They will likely lose their fishing rights, so that American fishers can sell us more.

This isn't a competition. This is what losing a war looks like.

The deal furthermore eliminates EU tariffs on all U.S. industrial goods. That just means more European businesses are going to go bankrupt, especially German ones, since the US is not eliminating its tariffs on any EU goods.

The deal also says that Europeans must buy at least 750 billion USD worth of energy during the remainder of Trump's term. Why? Well, because the Americans sabotaged the Nord Stream pipeline. That cut Europe off from cheap Russian gas. Now, we'll have to purchase American shale gas at extortionate, war-racketeering prices.

And the EU will be required to invest 600 billion USD worth of euros in the U.S. economy. That's just code for migrating most of German industry out of Germany and into the USA. As a result, Europe becomes a limp leper totally dependent on the USA.

This is, indeed, rightfully called the America First Trade Agenda. Except, it has also made the USA an enemy of Europe. A future war between the US and the EU is now a possibility, one I particularly favor over the alternative that is dwindling away in irrelevance.

Our leaders in Brussels are complicit in the greatest treason ever committed in human history. They ought to be placed under arrest immediately and tried for treason. The actions of these Brussels bureaucrats cannot be explained other than by assuming they are spies serving American and Israeli interests.

It is time, therefore, for Europeans to begin seceding from this trans-Atlantic partnership. Europe can only have a future if it dares to rebuild its strengths, skills and competencies at home, namely by investing all that money in one’s own people.

It means abandoning the USA and accepting whatever economic cost is involved. We shall turn our backs on the money-men of Wall Street. We'll reinvest our time and effort into a spiritual revival instead.

Europe has won the opportunity to rebuild a Holy Roman Empire—a continent ruled by an Emperor. That way, we may play all sides independently.

We shall then withstand the pressures from the emerging Russian-American alliance. For indeed, Russia and the USA are now allies, and Europe is their mutual enemy. Neither side can be trusted. Europeans can only survive by retreating within, and discovering there the still lingering energy of a forgotten God.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

As I’m preparing myself for doing public speeches, I decided to give myself some practice. This speech may be overly intellectual, but it describes the process our whole civilization is going through. Our democratic systems with their liberal values are creeping toward the end. After the collapse of our over-hyped economies, we shall be free again to usher in the Rebirth of our race.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Daniel Clark (TikTok, X) is from South Africa and is a pro-White Afrikaner activist. He is very knowledgeable about what’s going on in South Africa, and the message is clear: We cannot escape and run away. We have to get organized, fight back. And that fight starts with winning the narrative war!

Below are the notes and questions I prepared in advance. Watch the video for the actual interview.

Notes and Questions

Introductions

How would you describe the race relations in SA?

Who are the blacks now in charge of this ANC, and other groups?

Have you seen the movie Treurgrond? They would never show that on Dutch TV.

I read from the book by Ernst Roets about the farm murders. Have you experienced such crimes in your neighborhood?

How common are the farm killings really?

In The Netherlands, for a long time, we pointed our fingers at SA for Apartheid. Today, cities such as Amsterdam and Rotterdam are more racially segregated than Johannesburg.

Don't you think that's ironic?

The idea of Apartheid was that people of different races develop at different paces, and that these difference should be respected. But the equality cult made everyone equal.

How have you and your people experienced this transition to the Rainbow Nation?

What did you think of Donald Trump's offer to accept South Africans?

When the first Afrikaners arrived to the USA, they were mocked for their appearance, because they looked so normal.

Where else are Afrikaners migrating? Are you thinking of leaving SA?

Do you think there should be an option for White Afrikaners to return to Europe?

But Europe is very urbanized, a lot of concrete and steel, and no nannies and pools in your backyard.

Do you think Afrikaners prefer their freedoms at home?

I remember making a video about this right to return which was watched a lot in SA a year ago. People wrote me for help to get them out of SA.

What are the cities in SA like? Have the cities been taken over by the blacks by now? And do the Whites really live mostly in the countryside?

I watched that series called Kommandokorps where they train White Afrikaner boys, a sort of initiation rite.

How are you preparing the youngest generations for this conflict with the blacks?

Is this the choice then, leave or go to war with the black regime?

How can people in Europe support your cause?

I have heard of this organization Die Suidlanders, they are preparing for what to do in case the blacks decide to genocide the Whites. Is that a real possibility?

What is the legacy of Eugene Tèrreblanche and his movement? What happened to him and his movement?

There are storied of a few Dutch people still migrating to South Africa to buy land, to escape our urbanized country. What would you tell them?

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

This was a casual livestream about some important issues, such as forming new elites, organizing in secret. And then there’s this repeated question: What do you think of Nicholas Fuentes? The ladies in the chat seemed to think Nick and the Groypers have a problem with women.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Sadly, there was an audio issue with the guest during the live. I was able to restore the second half of our conversation.

I got the opportunity to speak to mother and astrologist Amber Morrigan (TikTok, X) about women in the pro-White movement, class difference, and everything else going on.

Below are the notes and questions I prepared for the interview. Watch the video above to listen to the actual talk.

Notes and Questions

Introductions
Thanks for taking the time, I understand you recently became a mom?
How would you describe your personal politics today, what is most important to you?
Would you tell a bit about your background, and what seems to have transformed you from a sort of normie to a more pro-White advocate?
I ask my guests what the free speech climate is like where they live.
Some of us in Europe can easily be arrested for speaking the wrong words. How about you, do you feel free to speak your mind?
Are White normies waking up at all or should we just consider them collateral damage?
Our political clear keep pushing immigration but they also never invest in bigger families at home. Why do you think they want to erase us?
What do you think are the biggest issues between men and women nowadays?
Over here in Europe, we became very atheistic after the second world war, and this loss of spirituality was replaced with pop music and porn. Can we ever heal from any of this? How does our race of people escape this degeneracy?
How do you feel about the way White people, our history, and even our ancestors are constantly being slandered by the media?
A lot of White people go along with defaming their own kind to be liked by so-called minorities? Why do you think people put themselves last?
I think it's called White savior complex when they try to look good being white themselves but also putting other White people down?
How do we improve our fate, is it time to separate and basically leave diversify behind again?
What are your thoughts about modern feminism and the way society has changed since 1950?
Now many women are forced to work full-time when they might have had it easier in the past?
I understand you care about nutrition. How do you think modern food has affected us?
What do you know about seed oils and soy?
Is the vegan activism that makes you feel guilty for eating meat and dairy an attack on our people?
What about cholesterol, it's an essential building block for our hormones.
You mentioned on your X that we're transitioning into a new astrological age of technology. What do you think is going to happen?
I think modern technology is already getting harmful to humans. Do you think it will get even worse?
How do we counter this technological nightmare, is religion an option? Can we bring people back to, say, a more religious life?
How would you describe the future you would like to see become real?

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

During my livestreamed chat with TikTok speaker Roisin O’Flaherty (TikTok, Instagram), the eloquent lady and I discussed Woke conservatism, the fake boomer Right, and many other issues plaguing White people, especially the ethnic betrayal committed against us by our own so-called conservative leaders.

Below are the questions and notes I had prepared on beforehand. Watch the video above to see the actual interview.

Notes and Questions

Introductions
Why did you start speaking on TikTok? How do you experience the speech climate under Starmer?
How would you describe your personal politics? What are the issues of top concern to you?
What political movements do you still trust if even Reform UK is Woke? What options are left for British people who want to break free from globalism?
Farage may be a containment politician. What do you think the British elites are so afraid of that they have to silence the right-wing? Is it just about money, or something else?
It's as if liberals have infiltrated all the conservative movements? How would you deal with the liberal/leftist assault on truth and reality?
How do you explain the trans movement? Since it seems to affect mostly men, is it perhaps meant to harm women, by design? How to stop this madness?
The conference on saving England with Rupert Tomb: Even the right-wing is ruled by free market conservatives who think people are interchangeable units?

Morgoth wrote about the conference,

Quote: "… the younger generation of the British right wants answers from the mainstream British right to existential problems, in large part created by the mainstream British right, and they’re not getting them."
Quote: "Niall Ferguson argued that Europe would die without African immigration." This scaremongering effectively disqualifies White women from being mothers and have large families of their own. Why on earth?
Quote: "Fundamentally, the problem is that the entire multicultural enterprise is based on lies and coercion, ... Take, for example, the trend of inserting non-white people into historical roles or period dramas." Why do you think they're trying to erase our people from history?
Quote: "… the emerging generation of young men on the British right often appears like an elite in-waiting …" This ties into “elite overproduction theory”, a new radical elite will want to oust the old? The Zoomer generation would be ready for ethnonationalism, if only the Old Conservatives would hand over the reigns?
The so-called boomer conservatives are fully on board with multiculturalism and diversity. They only hate Islamic extremism, but they also hate their own people. What's the dynamic behind this?
Do you see Christianity playing a role in the revival of our peoples? How?
What would you like the future to be like? What do you expect will happen?

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

I am publishing a new book. My paid subscribers will receive a PDF and EPUB link in a few days.

Synopsis

Hikers atop a snowy mountain discovered a dead man inside a trekker's tent, clutching a diary in his frozen hands. In a series of undated entries, Atonement for the Shadow is the psychological account of a man’s journey from suicidal beginnings to his ascent as Death's Champion. The frozen man’s thoughts reveal sometimes dark insights about society and the self.

This book is intended for those looking to explore their darker side, the stronger, more ruthless version of themselves, also known as the Shadow.

Ebook available on Amazon »

paperback coming soon (from August 14th)

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

From time to time, I can sense that the economy is taking a downturn. This affects only working people and those with small savings. For the financial elites, it can be beneficial to plan massive new infrastructure projects, like bridges crossing channels and seas. But do the jobs created really add to the well-being of common people? Or are we cannibalizing our economy and digesting ourselves?

An increasing number of young people, even—or especially—those who have managed to start a family, are finding there’s no future for them in their own countries. Rents and mortgages are unaffordable. Cars are becoming too expensive. Anyone who thinks 20-year-olds can afford a new electric car is missing something.

A major driver of this malaise is the education system. Degrees and diplomas no longer guarantee a job. Western nations have become overeducated yet underpowered. Young American graduates are leaving higher-educated states and moving to so-called lower-educated states. Traditionally, it was the opposite. Higher-educated states paid better salaries despite increased job competition. Today, there are no jobs at all. So, young people are flocking to states with lower pay but at least some demand for educated workers.

This is the insanity we’re dealing with. What happens when the educated and reasonably smart class of graduates finds out their efforts were in vain? That being a smart, credentialed person doesn’t matter anymore? That you’d have been better off starting a TikTok channel making thirst trap videos? You could have been the next Addison Rae or Madison Humphrey. But you studied facial recognition technology, earned a PhD in iris scanning, and now you’re jobless.

To protect their fragile positions, Boomers, Gen X’ers, and Millennials are feverishly holding onto all the jobs. That’s why every job posting now requires a minimum of 10 years’ experience for what used to be entry-level roles, even for technology that’s barely five years old. You have to be old to get a new job. So, if you’re Gen Z or Gen Alpha, it’s time to realize there may never be jobs for you anymore.

This has happened before. In the mid-19th century, during China’s Qing dynasty, a man named Hong Xiuquan failed his exams to become an official four times. It drove him so mad that he adopted Protestantism and rallied millions against the state. It was called the Taiping Rebellion, and over 20 million people died. The event was only overshadowed by the Second World War.

If history is any guide, the atmosphere in the West spells revolution too. Not just a workers’ revolution to overthrow the bourgeoisie, but a revolution of the bourgeoisie against the 0.1%. Unlike during the Taiping Rebellion, Americans and Western Europeans face the arrival of their immigrant replacements by the millions. Our ruling classes understand this situation well. They’ve positioned themselves to side with immigrants against the white middle class.

Even Hillary Clinton, the former presidential candidate, once wrote in her university thesis that “the middle class is where the wealth is.” She quoted Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, outlining a program to dispossess the white Zoomers and Gen Alphas who now can’t get jobs.

Clinton wrote her thesis when jobs were plentiful, limited only by one’s ambition. Today’s young people must face a gauntlet. You’ve been discarded by the society that taught you to obey it. You’ve been betrayed by the politicians who told you to work hard, study hard, and party hard.

Your bad luck doesn’t stop here. You are the middle class. You still have some assets and savings. If you don’t, your parents do. The ruling elites need that wealth to fund the migrant revolutions against you. It’s not enough to print more money to devalue your savings. They’re actively looking to seize your assets—your houses, yachts, boats, and bicycles—to hand them to migrants as a reward for siding with the rich.

I’m joking. Most of you don’t own yachts. But you have a life, and they’ll take that, too.

The Situation in Western Europe

In Western Europe, the situation is just as bleak. Countries like Britain show, clear as day, what these elitist scammers have in store for us. Despite mass immigration, the magic GDP line has stopped going up. So how do the royal rich keep enriching themselves when even the colonies no longer offer returns on investment?

They rob the middle classes. To put this in perspective, the middle classes usually own more wealth in savings combined than the total money controlled by the top banks in their country. Clinton was right. The middle class is where the money is, and every predatory aristocrat knows it. White middle-class people are the fattened cows now being led to the slaughterhouse.

As long as you remain unaware of the process, it works like this: You work. You pay taxes. Your taxes are spent on migrant housing, welfare benefits, or a host of companies and corporations in the immigration industry. Some hotel owners became billionaires thanks to taxpayer money handed to them by the government.

Rest assured, all European and American elites are heavily invested in this immigration industry. That’s why they keep telling you anyone can be British, French, or American just by learning a few words of our languages and acting offended if we say they still look foreign. To be “French” or “German” now means free subsidies, housing, welfare, priority jobs, and maybe even an e-bike thrown in—the kind ordinary working people could never afford to buy new.

While we scour marketplaces and thrift stores for second-hand goods to mimic what we can’t have, the government scam doesn’t end with handing Mohamed a free gym subscription and an unlimited public transportation pass. No! It started with immigrants, but there are lower-class folks too who could use free stuff paid for by you, the working fool.

Have you noticed the rise in self-diagnosed TikTok autists, ADHD’ers, and others inventing new mental conditions? It’s no surprise to me. You could get a free car if your condition is in the DSM-5, adjusted to your needs, of course. Why not take a free three-year subscription to ChatGPT for anyone claiming ADHD? You couldn’t live without Duolingo, could you?

I’m not kidding. I’m not making this up. In many European countries, you can get up to $10,000 worth of free stuff, including computer monitors and ergonomic chairs, just by claiming a mental condition. That explains why up to a third of young people now say they have a mental disorder. They’re not really crazy. They’re smart. If you can’t get a job anyway, why not fake a mental disorder to get benefits?

Is the U.S. Titanic Sinking?

If you’re my age, you may have noticed a societal shift: The physical has become the mental. In the 1980s, we arrested rapists and robbers. Now we arrest people who dare call someone a robber. Instead of protecting innocent people from violent crimes, we lock people up for the “hate crime” of saying hurtful words.

In the 1990s, people got sick with pneumonia. Now they have mental trauma from microaggressions. I attribute this to feminism. In a feminized world, someone running for mayor of New York City can say “violence is a social construct.” Your bruised face isn’t really bruised. You’re just a racist.

Beyond the weirdness of folks who believe building hospitals in Africa is the same as getting beat up in the Bronx—as revenge for colonialism—the West’s loss of masculine sanity points to another cause: exhaustion. The West has exhausted itself chasing money and trying to get rich.

That game isn’t working anymore. People may be angered when I say capitalism and communism are two sides of the same coin, like water vapor and ice. Both serve a financial elite. Capitalist societies transition to communist ones when their economies go bankrupt. Without a steady stream of wealth, former capitalist elites declare themselves communist and start rationing everyone else’s wealth—except their own.

This is why true communism has never been tried. It’s just a way for government cronies to rob productive middle-class people. You wouldn’t want elites to starve in their seventh home, would you? Likewise, a communist society that escapes material constraints becomes capitalist again. This is what Putin achieved when he forced Russian corporations to produce wealth for Russian citizens instead of American shareholders.

Russia today is capitalist, but Europe is communist. We used to point fingers at China for its backward ways. Now the Chinese point chopsticks at us for becoming what their revolutionaries once fought to escape. The USA is a dying empire. To stay in charge a bit longer, it must act like a dictatorship. Past ideals of democracy and free speech now sound like a farce. The phrase “Make America Great Again” and fighting for democracy are old tunes.

For now, the United States can force its allies to fund its economy and keep its elites rich. Europe, especially Germany, may provide a lifeline to American bankers by devouring European industry and robbing EU citizens of their assets, including housing and land. This way, the USA can appear capitalist while Europe becomes a communist nightmare.

As with those escaping communism, you’ll find you won’t be allowed to leave. In the New Europe, there will be border guards—not to keep people out, but to stop you from leaving. If you try to scale the barbed wire, they’ll shoot you in the back.

The death of Europe was announced in books like Douglas Murray’s The Strange Death of Europe. These books prepare you for what’s coming. If they wanted you to thrive, they’d promote titles like The Solution to Europe’s Strange Death. But they didn’t sell you that one, did they?

The Reaction

In the end, common people will support any system that works. If we conclude that our modern bourgeois system of democracy and open borders spells genocide, then we, in this moment, gain the moral right to stand up for ourselves. We aren’t cattle. We won’t be shipped off to the sausage factories of war just yet.

How do we prevent the West’s strange death and revive our civilization? We can start now. In this moment, you can realize that living for money and economic growth isn’t the right ideal. Our true enemies, those at the top, care only about corporate profits. We care about our blood and our soul.

Both sides are extreme, but only one represents the people, and a future for our people. Ours.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

I had a chat with a lady who spoke to me with a BBC presenter’s voice about diversity, immigration, commercials mocking White men, women’s safety, and many other things.

Follow her on TikTok » (as long as she isn’t banned)

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Western ruling classes appear more interested in going after people for wrongthink and so-called hate speech than in improving their people’s material fate. Have our ruling elites perhaps started buying into their own propaganda, trapping themselves inside the echo chambers of their creation?

The power elite have unmoored from reality. Barely holding on to lofty feel-good ideals of equality, safety, or diversity, they compensate for their diminishing relevance. It’s so much easier to tell a good story than to fix a real problem. It’s easier to ignore reality than to have to face it. But they’ll throw you in jail for talking back at them, or even for offering solutions.

The Repression of Speech

That’s what happend to the leader of the Students against Tyranny association in Norwich, UK. That young man was arrested by six police officers for calling illegal migrants possibly involved in the rape of a local teenager “foreign filth”. But if we can’t call foreign filth “foreign filth” anymore, what sort of civilization do we expect to get?

Getting arrested for the wrong words has been a hallmark of Western nations’ style for certainly the larger part of the past half century. Cracking down on speech began around the same time that these Western governments felt the need to import guest workers from North Africa, and elsewhere, by the millions. And so, our own people’s fate became tied to the well-being of others, many of whom despise us, if not outright hate us.

But the regime of Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer uniquely stands out. Under his two-tier policing schemes, it has been part and parcel for ordinary citizens to be sentenced to lengthy jail time, just for the crime of posting a single X tweet or Facebook post. Notably, in the wake of the Southport killings, when three girls were brutally and repeatedly stabbed by a son of African foreigners, hundreds if not thousands of Brits were fast-tracked to jail.

Meanwhile, cases involving actual violence and rape, besides hurty words, are drawn out to last for over a year, such as the case of two brothers, one named Muhammad, the other Mohammed, who punched a policewoman in the face, breaking her nose. Media initially only reported on the White policeman who had to use force to restrain the attacker afterward, as though media were trying to create the British George Floyd story, before bodycam footage finally put an end to that evil, farcical twist.

These British kangaroo courts befit the dealings of dictators, not democratic leaders, who, after all, were put in office by the very people now being arrested, namely for complaining about the reality of life in the United Kingdom.

Last year, a woman named Lucy Connolly got about 3 years in prison for posting,

“Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f*g hotels full of the b****s for all I care... If that makes me racist, so be it.”

X didn’t think the tweet was inappropriate and didn’t take it down. The British police, however, considered the message a race hate crime, despite that Lucy deleted her message within 3 hours. Connolly was kept in pre-trial detention as a way of forcing her to confess to the crime, under the false impression that a confession would get her out of prison more quickly. This is yet another token treatment of dictatorial regimes. And again, the aforementioned “Muhammed brothers” suffered no such pressure to confess. Some media are still defending them, though Connolly was universally condemned.

This is what the word racism is for, but Connolly didn’t actually hate people because of their race. She hated these specific migrants, who had been in the news after the Southport riots, for potentially harboring rapists, gang rapists, thieves, and murderers among their population. The remark wasn’t meant to incriminate all innocent migrants, It was a remark targeted toward those immigrants who do show criminal tendencies. One has every right to be angered by imported crime, for there is crime, and some of it is imported. Her judge failed to appreciate this important nuance.

During the Southport riots, the very real and negative side effects of mass immigration had brought many British people, including Connolly to the brink of frustration. Something needed to be done, but everyone knew politicians and their police henchmen weren’t going to do it. So the people rose up, started speaking their minds, and starting making demands. Prime Minister Starmer responded by releasing actual criminals from prison to make more room for polite citizens with differing opinions.

Mind you, some of these policemen involved in arresting innocent civilians could be the sort of police officers who would gladly join in the gang rapes of White girls as young as ages 11 and 12. Indeed, some of them did join in. It highlights, once more, the very real two-tier policing, if not between natives and immigrants, then certainly between speech crimes and actual violent crimes. It’s the speech crimes that are treated with the full force of the law, whereas the violent crimes are often dismissed and covered up.

Partly, this may be explained by the fact that speech crimes, especially if they were expressed in writing only, can be tracked and documented, whereas a girl gangraped might have no witnesses or recordings of her assault. Still, that doesn’t explain why speech crimes put people away for many years, when proven gang rapists appear to be getting off the hook with a slap on the wrist.

So, I’m not a lawyer, but there’s a clear and major judicial overreach when it comes to hurty words. I’m only using Britain as an example, here, because the Starmerite regime is so extremist, but the same illogic is captivating Germany, France, and many other countries and their citizens.

I myself was met with two police officers around early 2022, after I had posted a messaged on X. I had responded to the news about the first Ukrainians arriving to The Netherlands as refugees. There had been a local protest against their arrival, especially since it was revealed that many of these first migrants to arrive were actually Africans from Ukraine. These Africans apparently saw the war with Russia as an excuse to apply for asylum—and a passport—in the European Union. As opposed to returning home to their native Africa, they “fled” to Europe.

I had written on X something along the lines of, “This feels like we’re at war. It’s time to prepare!” X, in my case, also didn’t think my expression was illegal or criminal. The police officers at my door let me off with a warning, and didn’t fine me or arrest me. I felt they had come to intimidate me into deleting the tweet. This, I thought, was very strange. Why wouldn’t they just report the tweet to X instead of bothering me? I had an almost 20-minute-long debate with these officers, concluding with me repeating that the mass migrations into our country made me feel like we were at war.

In Germany, it’s even worse. Your house will be raided and you’ll be arrested for calling a politician fat or stupid, especially when the person you’re referring to is actually fat or stupid.

A German podcaster / activist by the name of Schlomo Finkelstein, real name Aron Pielka, is now publicly known as a right-wing extremist, anti-feminist, racist Islamophobe. In reality, his podcast show was largely an almost intellectual criticism of the German regime. This man was no extremist, but was made out to be one by the authorities.

Mr. Pielka started his podcast in 2015 in response to the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris, France. The so-called racist offense that got Finkelstein alias Pielka arrested was posting an image of a White woman flanked by two Muslim men with the admonishment, “You must integrate, White woman!” I.e., the poster was an almost truthful yet critical statement that, in Germany, White people are being forced to integrate into their new Islamic colony.

Why would you arrest a podcaster for this “non-crime hate incident”, as they would euphemistically call it in England, if it is simply a valid description of modern life in Germany? The mere suggestion that a threat might emanate from migration populations is why. This sort of suggestion goes against he mandated government narrative of Western elites that “diversity is our strength”. After all, if diversity weren’t really a strength, our blind-sided elites would have to go to jail for ruining their nations.

Ignorant, Unmoored Elites

Some things are clear: We are dealing with Western elites who have no proper understanding of the physical reality under their governance, nor do they possess the competencies to improve our material conditions. Admitting to this, would diminish their relevance and their status. So, they respond with repression, to shut people up.

Our elites have lost touch with reality, but since they still control the media narratives, and since they can still direct the police forces, they can have you arrested for the wrong speech.

It might be helpful to describe to you what, for example, German politics is like. Recently, a female German Minister of the Bundestag parliament expressed worries that certain German schools were now visited by entirely non-German and non-White demographics. Some schools are entirely populated by the children of immigrants who, in many cases, don’t speak a word of German.

To resolve this unwanted situation, the German Minister then suggested to divide these migrant children across more schools, so that each school would have, at most, 30% of migrant children. What this Minister wasn’t aware of is that, in Germany, in that age group under 12-year-olds, over 45% of children are children of immigrants. That means you can’t divide them all around other schools to reduce their number to 30% per classroom, unless you’re thinking of deportations or gas chambers, which the Minister clearly wasn’t.

This German Minister was simply ignorant of the reality of modern German demographics. She didn’t know that Germany had already imported so many migrants, that German children are now almost an absolute minority in their own schools.

This explains why Western ruling classes concern themselves so much more with broadcasting pleasant-sounding narratives than with practical problems—because it’s easier to ignore or suppress demands for solutions. It’s easier to write a story about how you tackled a problem than to think a problem through.

At the same time, Western political circles also care much less about, say, the genocide of soldiers in Eastern Ukraine, or the crisis in Gaza. As long as these atrocities aren’t happening in one’s own country, they won’t affect one’s national elections so much.

In my view, our elites are no longer an aristocracy, per the original meaning of the word that they are a selection of the nation’s most competent, i.e., the “best”. Rather, they have become a kakistocracy, a selection of the nation’s worst, people with zero ability to deal with the material problems at hand.

And so, these kakistocrats, or weak elites, have fled into controlling narratives. Through their control of the media, the kakistocracy can still paint themselves as do-gooders who deserve to stay in power. Instead of providing an actionable vision for the future, they offer the tropes of equality, diversity, and inclusion. It’s a way of saying, “Well, we’re being invaded by hostile hordes of foreigners, but since stopping them would cost us a lot of money, we’ll pretend it’s really the native citizens who are the problem.”

And then, these weak elites, started falling for their own propaganda! It used to be so that cunning aristocrats worked hard to devise narratives they could sell to people, to sway them this way or another way. In The Netherlands, we had a politician named Frits Bolkestein who explained it as follows: “We try to engineer the support base for our policies.”

At least, back then, they still cared about winning the people’s support for political policy, even if it had to be done through manipulation. Today, our political classes simply dictate to us their policies, if they even bother speaking to us at all, lest we find out afterward what they have already decided for us.

All this reminds me of the famous cave analogy in Greek philosopher Plato’s book The Republic. This analogy uses the image of prisoners chained in a cave with their backs to a wall, only able to see shadows on the wall in front of them. The prison jailors would move images and shapes before a fire, behind the prisoners’ backs, in order to project shadows onto the wall before them. The prisoners, who had been born in this cave, believed that the shapes on the wall were the only real reality, since they had never been outside.

Our ruling classes, however, behave as jailors who have hypnotized themselves into believing in the figments of their own imagination, whereas the cave’s prisoners have now escaped to see the real world.

This is how I would describe modern social media. Our political jailors still believe in the narratives they’re trying to sell us—diversity, inclusion, safety, equality, etc.—thought ordinary people have long woken up. When we, the people, then attack the images our political masters command us to believe in, they respond with repression.

I’m thinking of one case in Sweden when the sixteen-year-old son of a liberal politician, Migration Minister Johan Forssell, turned out to be a member of a far-right anti-immigration group. The Minister felt the need to publicly call out and humiliate his son, even repenting for the crime of being his son’s father.

That son, of course, is right to be concerned with mass immigration. What a betrayal to know that one’s own father is the one responsible for flooding your future with Somalis and Nigerians, just to uphold the impoverishing ideals of multiculturalism.

Western governments obsess over "misinformation" or "hate speech" as a way of distracting us from their inability to provide their peoples a meaningful future. This is why I think the media responded with such shock over the Whites-only settlements in Arkansas and Missouri. What concerns the political elites is that people have the nerve to walk out of a society that no longer serves them. Think of it this way, there is no greater insult to a politician than to tell them you’re better off without them.

Breaking Out

According to Paul Colinvaux, the author of the book The Fates of Nations: An Biological View of History, Western states will continue becoming more repressive. He reasoned that rich states with smaller populations will be the first to openly wage war on poorer states with larger populations, and if that prediction comes true, we shall see the Western ruling classes commanding us to die in wars against Iran, Russia, China, and other such countries.

You see, there is a geopolitical component to the naivety of the Western kakistocacy. Since they know they can’t win a war with the East or with the Global South on their own, they need alliances with foreign parties such as India, Pakistan, or even Nigeria and Ethiopia. By making Western Europe half African or half Indian, we might win the loyalty of their peoples, and discard them in the war against China as soldiers of the west.

It’s also for this reason that Western governments say they love Islam so much. They have to say so in order to win the gas and oil supplies coming out of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, whose oil sheiks can easily switch to another clientele. If the West won’t absorb mass Islamic immigration, pass Islamophobia laws, or paint Islam as a favorable religion in Britain or Germany, well then they’ll just sell their oil to China and destroy the West anyway but via another route.

To me, it seems ignorant to allow foreign parties to have such a large influence over our domestic policy. I’ve long wondered at what point it becomes a favorable strategy to simply deal with the hardship of going without cheap foreign fuel. I think we have already crossed that point. So why then haven’t the Western political regimes collapsed yet? Why are they still holding on to their fantasies of inclusion?

To answer this question: Western financial elites can still generate more power and wealth doing it this way, and so the political henchmen who work for the billionaires, including foreign billionaires, will want to maintain the status quo, for now, while bankrupting the White middle classes.

I foresee a totally different future, namely one in which those very middle-class White people choose to break free from the constraints of globalism. People are beginning to realize how much better off they’ll be without the demands of foreign alliances that might turn hostile any moment.

We would need to return to a configuration as before the Industrial Age, when the machines started weakening our bodies and minds. But we wouldn’t need to return to destitution or poverty at all. Just like the Amish or the Mennonites, such Christian fundamentalist groups who, in fact, responded to the Industrial Age by removing themselves from it, we could learn from these communities how to pretty much do everything we need to do for ourselves.

A traditional life is a life that instills the values of competence and ability. It teaches children as young as ages four to bake bread again. It teaches teenagers how to build their own house. These skills are no different from the ones our ancestors used to possess when they had nine children to attend to. Indeed, we can cut loose from the machinations of modern economic life and return to a slower-paced but much more fulfilling life of practical action.

For this, I have envisioned a movement called The Reaction, a reactionary movement further to the right of Fascism and National Socialism, with the intent of beating back the past 500 years of progress since the invention of liberalism.

It isn’t enough to merely change the politics of the political body if the body itself has grown weak, sick, and old. We reserve the right to devour the old system and use it merely as nourishment for the next phase. The goal of the Reaction is to achieve what is called The Ascent. The thought process behind all this goes as follows:

We have lived through an age of decline and degeneracy that has wasted our people’s potential;
There is no more way forward toward the dreamed Utopia of socialism, nor can we easily go back to tradition, for liberalism has burned the connection between the present and the past;
But we can still go up, toward the Summit, where our destiny lies, where new future awaits us, as in a higher order of life, where we once again bridge our glorious past with a desired future;
To begin this Ascent, we form a movement called The Reaction;
The goal of the Reaction is to win spiritual renewal;
Renewal means to become charged with confidence and competence, the very foundations of true human freedom;
We shall become high in virility as Practical Men of Action, for our society will be based on what we learn to do for ourselves, no longer as slaves of redistributive systems that keep us in want;
We shall thus overcome the Decline of the West and usher in its Revival;
The Revival of the West brings us an entirely new, never-before-seen civilization, one that supports ourselves best;
We re-establish ourselves as the formidable rulers of our phenomenal domain.

This time, we won’t lose the war. This time, we will win.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

We know that personal growth is the most important form of wealth. These societies that have stifled our growth for too long cannot and will not serve us. Our purpose, then, is to overcome this state of suffering that is leading nowhere. We weren’t born to suffer a life of inaction. We shall act in our best interests to overthrow the chains imposed upon us by the ruling classes. Our movement is a counter-revolutionary movement that will beat back suffering. We shall overcome the times and win back freedom.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

A bit of a philosophical insight for you, today. I discuss why German thinker Martin Heidegger disappoints because some of his insights are just peasants’ wisdom encoded as “academic philosophy”. I point out that Heidegger’s distinction between practical thinking (which he denounces as “unthinking”) and more meditative states of thinking (which calls “thinking”) are really the difference between more technical and practical-minded thoughts of men, versus the more generalist and more meditative thoughts of women. Both serve a perfect fine purpose, but then I propose a third way of thinking: embracing the peasants’ way, or simply, a return to common sense.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

The final speech cut from my latest livestream #88.

Some tens years ago, my only friend from high-school leaped from a balcony, head-first. I hadn’t spoken to him since graduation. I had no knowledge of it that he was suffering so much. He was the one good at getting girls. I had always been jealous of him. But if he had had the courage to phone me up or come by my house that day, he would have lived. I would have told him that I once had stood on that ledge, too.

But I didn’t jump. I didn’t jump, because in that ultimate moment when I looked down at the earth beneath me, I realized no one would care if I jumped or not. And that angered me so much. My anger turned into a warm-blooded feeling I now know is called strength. I knew I still had a choice. And I chose to fight back, I chose to F* around and find out what would happen to me if I started pushing back.

We all have to make that choice. When we are confronted with death, with the end, with unsurmountable setback, with pain and horror, with unbearable loneliness and humiliation, only then do we get to know ourselves and do we find out what we are truly made of. And I was made of stone! The chips in my face are the scars of adversity.

Be proud of what you have achieved! This world is yours to conquer. What was lost can be brought back. With your leadership and your courage, we will lead the peoples of the West back to a glorious new age. We shall revive the spirit of the European explorers, of the crusaders who defended the faith, of the Vikings on their lonely voyages, alone with the stars, of the Spartans who face the Persians and won, of the Bulgarians who freed themselves from under the Turkish yoke, of the Spanish Reconquista, of the Germans at Teutoburg, the Norsemen in Iceland, and of all the unrelenting souls we call our forebears.

They all live on through us. And as God is with us, we will be with them, soon, not as cowards, but as victors who fought harder than ever before.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Thank you to everyone who tuned into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app.

A feminist woman in Mexico, Isabella Cêpa, risks being sent to jail for 25 years because she called a man a man on X. Former Mexican congressman Gabriel Quadri was equally forced to apologize every day for one month for the thought crime of pointing out that some men who disguise themselves as women had taken seats in congress reserved for biological women. He was put on a list of people who have shown aggression toward “women”.

2025 is the most Orwellian 1984. “War is peace, freedom is slavery,” and men are women. What is the purpose of this confusion, other than to allow confused men to unleash their hateful reign onto innocent civilians? Is it a justification to harm women while calling women’s defenders “misogynist”?

When the sick rise to power, their first act is always to make the healthy equally sick, in order for the sick to remove their personal shame over being so abnormal. They want to make normal what can never be normal.

In the West, in Europe and in the USA, we have also experienced similar cases of totalitarian abuse. Under Jack Dorsey, my then-Twitter account was suspended, because I had dared calling Lia Thomas a man. And last year, after I had argued on TikTok that young women should be given priority access to housing, so they could start having families, someone reported me to the police for “hatred of women”.

Earlier this month, the University of Pennsylvania corrected the record, stating that Lia Thomas would no longer be allowed to compete against women in swimming competitions.

During the last Paris Olympics that shocked the world by opening with a Satanic ritual mocking Jesus Christ’s last supper, female athletes were treated with contempt by the same people who will also jail you for calling out men dressed as women. In The Netherlands, some sanity has returned, as the Eindhoven Box Cup barred transsexual boxer Imane Khelif from participating. Khelif, who is a man, won the women’s gold medal at the Paris Olympics.

We remember that the International Olympic Committee insisted, repeatedly, that Khelif was a woman, and that everyone who disagreed, again, was a woman-hater. Why is it that powerful people and authoritative organizations will rather jail people for seeing biology than to protect biological women from getting beat up by men? Who are the real women-haters here?

It is the people in power who hate women.

Modern Ritual Sacrifice

We should praise President Donald Trump where he deserves it. Despite the Epstein scandal, under the influence of this Administration, a lot of the gender insanity has been called out and overturned. Many Western sports institutions are returning to competitive categories based on biologic sex. Even the British High Court of Justice declared earlier this year, to the apparent shock of Prime Minister Keir Starmer who kept quiet about it for five days, that a woman is indeed a biological female.

There’s a catch, though, signalling the battle isn’t over, and only a small tactical victory has been won. The US Olympic and Paralympic Committee will still allow people born as women, but disguised as men, to compete against men in men’s leagues. See, the insanity is still there, though the weirdos in charge are implicitly admitting that biological women, contrary to Hollywood fiction, pose no threat to males in sports, and that there are only two sex-based sports leagues, male and female. Where are the other 65 made-up gender categories?

At least for 2028, transgenders won’t be welcomed to the Olympic Games. I presume President Trump doesn’t want to come off looking like a Satanic f****t the way President Macron of France made himself out to be. Likewise, newly appointed IOC president Kristy Coventry said she wants to “protect the women’s category”, but why doesn’t she want to protect the men’s category as well? Why not completely abolish this nonsense while you had the chance?

It turns out every possible self-proclaimed genderfreak is still welcome in the men’s category. I think international governing bodies are just backtracking a bit now, temporarily, to attack more ferociously later, perhaps when medical torture has become so advanced that it will be hard to detect which child’s sex has been mangled. So we better prepare for it, for the gender Holocaust. The war on our sons—since boys are the primary target of the trans cult—is far from over.

Is It a Distraction?

Some may brush off the whole gender politics as a distraction designed to keep people from worrying about their economic fates, just the way foreign wars are welcomed as economic boosters. But I rather think the LGBT cult, along with the euthanasia or the assisted-death craze, is an expression of a deeper, almost occultly philosophical problem. Societies that turn gay the way Western societies have done may simply be dying. There isn’t even a desire to fight back anymore. The pride flag is a symptom of an incurable, terminal disease. It communicates a civilization’s surrender.

I think I know why: The nine-to-five conditioning that most Western people have suffered since the Industrial Age has so regimented our lives that it has sterilized our spirits.

And now it has affected, or rather infected, Mexico and Latin America, as well. For as the West is dying of this gender-disease, so will all of its economic dependents. Although I agree with American audiences that the gay pride parades started in Europe, and gay marriage was first legalized in my country, The Netherlands, on April 1st, 2001, I must also point out that nowadays, the gay lifestyle is being aggressive promoted through American embassies abroad, in Arab and African countries, for example, in exchange for development aid or military support.

Even very conservative countries are being forced to swallow the LGBT pill, “or else”, the full force of the US Army might end up on their doorstep. I think this is so, because a dying civilization has an interest in trying to export its diseases. Exporting one’s problems to so-called partners is a way of offloading one’s domestic problems, but also a way of ensuring that, in case the USA does grow very sick and weak, there will be no competitors left to threaten a weakened, enfeebled United States.

You wouldn’t want your former allies to turn into your enemies and be able to defeat you now that you have become soft, would you?

The global LGBT cult, then, in my view, is modern ritual sacrifice. Or let’s call it by its actual name: the LGBT spectrum is really an infertility cult, if not a death cult, meant to export infertility to susceptible populations, including those of Africa, the Arab World, India, Russia, and wherever else the American Empire has the power of influence. The aggressive, totalitarian nature of those pushing this poisonous ideology thus stems from a collective, archetypal fear that healthy, virile peoples might overrun the Old Lady of the West.

Geopolitically speaking, the cultural exportation of the LGBT dogma betrays the West is afraid of losing power, so afraid that it is already trying to sabotage other people’s fertility. What I am speaking of here needs to be understood as a sort of civilizational unconscious, or what Swiss psychoanalyst Carl Jung would have called the collective unconscious. The West has grown sick, and its sickness has manifested itself as a mental disorder spreading to all corners of the Earth.

Decline as a Business Model

We have a relatively wealthy middle class in the Western world, but its members have a median age of over 45. In other words, the oldest people alive on our planet are the richest, and the richest people tend to be the oldest people.

But in a stagnating economy, these well-off people will naturally try to limit the birth rates in their own nations, since raising and educating children from birth to a productive age is incredibly costly, even considered wasteful. It is much cheaper to import fully grown adult migrants who have been raised and educated in foreign lands, paid for by foreign governments.

This partially explains the Western elites’ love for mass immigration, but doesn’t quite explain the total lack of investment in family formation at home, for even migrants coming to the West will find that their birth rates, too, are being suppressed and diminished over time. The black Surinamese population The Netherlands, for example, has the lowest birth rates of all ethnic groups living in that country. They aren’t thriving, they are suffering among apartment blocks that could have been built by the Soviets.

A short while back, the average birth rate of Indians living in India dropped below the requisite replacement rate of 2.2, forcing India to start welcoming migrants of its own, while its so-called ‘best people’ are emigrating out to all over the world, likely to send remittances back to India to keep the Indian economy alive. Mexicans are doing the same thing, sending money back home from the USA, without which the Mexican economy couldn’t survive. It’s a form of parasitism then, living off of the fading life force of another, dying nation.

The crucial point to understand here is that young people, wherever they live, can only either spend their wealth on having a family of their own, or spend it on economic squander such as needless luxury, holidays, or national elderly care programs. Western societies are indeed telling young people to spend all of their money on rent and taxes, effectively neutering them. Aging societies will certainly want their youngest generations to forego having families that drain the state’s coffers. Instead, they will want the younger generations to work themselves to death in order to keep the older generations alive, and comfortably so.

My own father spent 11 days in a hospital recently, and although he was well insured and the service provided was beyond excellent, the cost amounted to over 2,000 Euros per day, just for the hospital room, plus expenses for food, drink, and entertainment. The bill totaled over 25,000 Euros, paid for by other insurance policyholders. In fact, the care of old people, i.e., the cost of keeping very old people alive, is now the largest expense in most Western economies—but as long as there are people willing to work and pay for these sums, elderly care remains an extremely lucrative business.

It’s only going to get worse. Britain won’t even hire native White nurses and doctors anymore, because they are too expensive. It is cheaper to bring in Nigerians, because they’ll accept lower pay, and besides, Britain has a deal with Nigeria, for geopolitical reasons, to hire more black people, likely in exchange for Nigerian loyalty to the West. I mentioned George Orwell, and in that book, Britain and America side with Sub-Saharan Africa to fight Russia and Europe.

Imagine Being White

I hope you can appreciate what is happening here: White middle classes are being squeezed and robbed by their own governments in order to secure political loyalty from foreign nations such as India, Nigeria, the Saudis and others. This strategy is called “holding on to wealth until we die”. The strategy I propose, in a bit, will be called “saving our souls”. The present path is not a sustainable path. It leads to a dead end, namely when the White middle classes of the West neither have any more savings left, nor any children running around at home.

Squeezing the middle class out of its wealth, and taking the land from farmers to sell it to foreign squatters, is another ingenious business model invented by Western ruling elites. It is also, yet again, more modern ritual sacrifice.

Imagine being the White middle classes of Western nations, and spending your whole life, and for multiple generations, paying taxes into a State you thought was going to protect you. Only to find out that those States will readily replace you with foreigners from outside of Europe. And, that you're not allowed to debate this problem, for you'll be branded a "racist" or a “woman-hater”, and get put on a terrorist watch-list, as they force you to watch your people die out, live in poverty, and lose even their history as it is being rewritten to serve Nigerian fantasies of Black princes building historic London.

Yes, that’s exactly what all the historic revisionism is about, from black Vikings to Muslim soldiers liberating Europe from Hitler—all fiction, of course. Oh, but if you would be so kind to die in foreign wars for Israel, for multinational corporations, and for absolutely no other reason than to discard White men as rusty bolts in a bucket.

The LGBT cult, the anti-natalist movements, the banks blaming babies for climate change are all part of a gigantic ritual sacrifice of the sort we haven’t seen since the bloodstained steps of the Meso- and Latin-American pyramids. The difference is, instead of cutting out your heart, they cut off your genitals. Though actual killings, I think, aren’t too far removed from our present time, either. In my country of The Netherlands, politicians are already debating whether children under the age of 12 should be allowed to apply for euthanasia if they feel depressed.

It’s not that hard to imagine what comes next. Historians know of late-stage Rome when Romans started systematically castrating their boys and raping children in broad daylight. But the response to these disturbing acts later became known as Christianity. It were the Christian teachings that brought order and health back to Europe.

Countering the Madness

I’m not interested in merely being part of the decline, as though I were a spectator witnessing the end of Western civilization. Whatever will or won’t happen, we need a movement willing to contest the status quo, so that a good portion of our peoples may reboot themselves in another timeline.

We can’t go on like this anymore. Things will have to change, and they’ll only change if we change them. We’ll have to do it ourselves. And we can do it. We need a reactionary movement to secure a future for our people. Those groups of men and women who are capable now of organizing themselves into resistance groups that, at first, remain largely hidden and secret, but who, behind the scenes, develop their skill, may have the best chances at their survival in the post-apocalyptic world.

If I were the last radio show on Earth after the zombies had taken over, what would I tell the survivors? I’d tell them to kill ‘em all. I’d tell my audience they already survived the end, and now it’s their jobs to be the vigorous new beginning. And I know many of you are regularly tuning in. I could be your priest inspiring you with confidence. You won’t find this confidence among your destitute surroundings, but you’ll find it in that quiet moment by yourself, when you’re worrying about the future, and a faint little voice in the back of your head grows loud and says,

“Goddamnit, fight! Fight,!Fight!”

You weren’t made a descendant of your powerful ancestors merely to give up now! Who are you to lose faith in yourself! You are not a traitor. You are no such disappointment. You are a fighter, a warrior. You’ve got grit, you’ve got your wit. The reason you are still here is because the others gave up too soon. You didn’t give up! You may feel tired now, but that’s only because you’ve been strong for too long! I say to you: You are the future. You are the new aristocracy, the new elite.

They all live on through us. And as God is with us, we will be with them, soon, not as cowards, but as victors who fought harder than ever before.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Today’s background painting is called Belshazzar’s Feast (John Martin, 1821), depicting a scene after Babylon destroyed the First Temple in what is now Israel.

A commenter noted that their 3-year-old toddler appeared to behave as a drunk adult man. The comparison got me to study the cognitive side effects of the most popular recreational drugs in use throughout recent history, say, since the 1920s.

And indeed, each popular substance, varying from decade to decade, from alcohol to fentanyl and everything in between, if used regularly, has the specific effect of experiencing impaired memory, diminished cognition, and reduced executive function or decision-making ability. Recreational drugs are likely so popular because they help return people to a childlike state, presumably, to escape the dread of adult responsibilities.

A Dependent People

I’m not a fan of drug abuse, but now I understand better why so many conservative movements traditionally always argue against drug use and even against alcohol. Though I can relate to people seeking temporary relief from stress, for example, it becomes a problem when addictions trap people in a permanent childlike state when the cognitive damage becomes lasting or even permanent.

Even marijuana, for example, especially when regular use starts in one’s teenage years, leads to a permanent cognitive slowdown in adulthood. Is this, now, the so-called “opening of one’s mind” that liberals advertise? It appears, to me, more like a closing of one’s mind. There’s nothing revolutionary about not being able to make decisions.

I can also see why liberal movements traditionally have always argued for the use of legally permitted drugs. Profit motives may play a role, as well, since many states around the world, or at least their elites, by law tend to control the production of alcohol or other recreational substances, such as Sweden’s Systembolaget, a government-owned chain of liquor stores. Under the Romanov family, the Czar family, the Russian state controlled the production of vodka, offering a considerable stream of income.

The other reason may be that people, devolved into a reduced state of cognition, become more governable. A person regularly under the influence of recreational substances that diminish one’s memory function, executive function, and decision-making ability, can no longer be expected to govern himself.

See, a modern state needs a dependent people, and dependent people need a state to govern them. It’s a two-way process. There are people who prefer to shun adulthood and relinquish their responsibilities to a more powerful actor, such as Father Government or Mommy Media. The supply of such people is matched by the needs of a state for precisely the irresponsible people who need constant supervision.

It’s a business model. It’s much easier to control citizens if they would exist permanently on a lower level of mental capacity than to have to deal with outspoken adults who demand to be treated equally and seriously by the State! Taken to the extreme, the difference between independent humans and algorithmic slaves is that between lions roaming the plains and termites following the queen’s programming. Aldous Huxley warned of it in his novel Brave New World, but I suspect that our globalist overclass sees it as desirable to have people biologically conditioned by functional caste.

That functionality implies a people’s erasure. It means making people into a blank slate so that the state can reprogram them as needed. Biological features of language, race, culture, sex, or nation must all be effaced to make us as visually identical as termites or ants. This is what is meant by equality. It’s the erasure of your personality, your race, and of your national culture in order to make newborns interchangeable and ready for their conditioning. Whether raised as drone manager or worker drone, the future salary will be identically 0, for you will be a slave regardless of rank or fervor.

If so-called liberal and progressive regimes, then, can benefit from reducing their population’s cognitive functioning, by making people dependent on substances that also make people more dependent on the State for their governance, does that, perhaps, also explain why such states should favor demographics with lower IQs, more akin to the abilities of children? Does all of this have anything to do with the push for feminism, putting more childless women in charge of society who end up treating their electorates as though we were still children in need of a caring mother?

It’s an attack on responsible adulthood disguised as hedonistic pleasure.

Political Colors

All this brings me to color theory. Bear with me. They say that the color black represents dominance or power, and white signifies supremacy, whereas brown means maturity, red means leadership, green is wealth or nature, and blue is trustworthiness. This might be complete nonsense, though I can see why the brightest colors of the rainbow are now being used together in the new cultural emblem of the West, the Pride flag, because these bright colors mimic precisely the colors that children love so much.

The color scheme of one’s natural culture kind of represents their underlying values. The red-white-blue so often found on flags of North-Western Europe appears to indicate societies that value leadership, superiority, and trustworthiness more than anything. The rainbow flags, by contrast, represent a sort of insanity. Rainbows used to be considered as a symbol of God’s covenant with Noah, and in Norse mythology a rainbow, named Bifrost, was a bridge to Asgard, to Valhalla.

Others will be looking for a pot of gold. But we never made rainbows our national emblems.

Today, toy stores stand out in a shopping street precisely for these colors, to lure children in with their excitement, and then, to deceive the same children into identifying with an LGBT movement. One of my viewers noted a while ago that certain toy stores have started waving the Pride flag, and many kids’ toys carry the rainbow flag as its symbol. This is how poison is often delivered, disguised as something appetizing. In this case, it’s the mental poison of a child-hating cult wrapped in colorful gift wrapping.

In many countries around the world, we attach colors to our political parties. In most Western countries, there is a saying that one must admit to one’s political color. It means to disclose one’s preferred political system or movement, coded by a certain RGB value. Generally speaking, red stands for socialism or communism, green for ecology and environment, blue for conservatism or liberalism, and yellow, which is a mix of red and light green, for libertarian.

In my country of The Netherlands, the liberal-progressive business party VVD carries a deep blue, the socialist party SP has its tomato red, and the Dutch Reformed Party carries the royal orange. This is how it is in most countries that have a conservative, liberal, or socialist political wing.

In the USA, they seemingly reversed it, as the Republican Party carries the red, and the Democrats carry the blue, i.e., the difference between leadership and trustworthiness. The apparent swap (red right, blue left) comes from the fact that Republicans started out as the anti-slavery, pro populist party, and they are still the more populist party. A billionaire technocrat would ordinarily vote Democrat.

The greens everywhere are associated with natural wealth, and, for some reason, with the deserts of Islam. Green happens to be Islam’s house color, and I always took it to mean a threat, namely in reference to the lush green pastures just north of the Islamic world, namely in Europe, the place that Muslims have so often attempted to conquer during the past 1400 years.

Black and White

More interestingly, the colors white, brown, and black are nowadays often absent from the parliamentary spectrum. Rather, they have disappeared, and that is because the mature deep brown color is associated with the brownshirts of German National Socialism, and the dominant black color references the Italian Fascists, ignoring even the white of the Worldwide White Supremacy.

These more mature colors—black, brown, and white—are particularly exempt from the rainbow Pride flag. I get the refractory meaning of it. Using a prism, you can fracture White light into all the other colors. The white light dissolves into its components and this symbolizes diversity, for the words “more diversity” just mean “fewer White people”.

Black light, on the other hand, doesn’t exist, and I’m not referring to the deep UV-A purple sometimes called a blacklight. Black is actually the absence of color and can symbolize the absence of a State. To truly comprehend the meaning and power of color, I recommend getting a copy of Theory of Color, a book by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, the famous German poet who was also a part-time research scientist.

Like Fascists and anarchists, Muslim jihadists have adopted the black flag. Each in their own way seeks to topple a regime they no longer support. Though in the case of Fascism, however, the goal is to overthrow globalist liberalism and restore national order. Jihadists would be looking to establish a tribal Islamic order alien to Western values. Anarchists just want to overthrow any and all order, but the color black still fits their need for winning personal dominance.

It makes sense that Benito Mussolini, before he became a Fascist, started out as an anarchist working for a socialist paper in Italian-speaking Switzerland.

In Ernst Jünger’s novel Eumeswil (Ömswil), the author proposes the anarch in contrast to the monarch. Both the monarch and the anarch are absolute rulers, but the anarch doesn’t have a people. Unlike the anarchist, the anarch doesn’t hate society, nor does he seek to destroy it. The anarch blends in with the world like a chameleon without worrying too much about the law.

Being like an anarch may be a useful step toward re-empowering oneself, to loosen the tie between one’s citizenship and state control. An anarch, in sense, is an adult who doesn’t take the outside world all too seriously.

Maturity and Supremacy

I hope after all this talk of colors in politics you can now also appreciate why the Third Reich swastika flag had such a powerful appeal, as did the flag of Japan, —and this isn’t a coincidence—, combining the red of leadership with the white of supremacy. Notice that without the Swastika, the German flag would have been the inverse of the Japanese flag, and that both countries were allies during World War II.

Indeed, after the end of World War II, the politics of diversity have almost entirely replaced the tougher politics of a dominant, mature supremacy. But isn’t that a bit odd? Why would the most mature, superior, and powerful colors be banned from the West’s political spectrum, the same black, brown, and white missing from the pride flag?

Well, as with the disappearance of the colors of the political far-right, maturity has also been replaced with a worship of childishness. Remember when adulting became a verb and kids were told never to grow up?

Nowadays, TV and Netflix propaganda bombard people with this message that we should reconnect with our inner child. What I actually think is happening is that ordinary citizens are being domesticated. They are specifically instructed, through media and education, not to develop the skill to govern oneself, but to remain totally dependent on State guidance.

Who wouldn’t agree, today, that education is meant to stunt your development and stifle your progress? It’s meant to dumb your down because it’s to prevent you from leveling up.

The Invisible

There is a hidden color, here. It is the unseen, transparent layer of modern power, the invisible color of corporate globalism, like a see-through mirror. To shatter it, we shall need a neo-Fascist or neo-Reactionary counter-movement, a form of anti-globalist anarchism, not merely to destroy globalism and then to live among its pointy shards, but to clean up the whole mess, and to revive a mature and healthy nationalism in its place.

We shall shatter globalism into a thousand nations by uniting the dominant, mature leaders among our peoples to take over. The power wielded by multinational corporations needs to be brought back under the command of national leaders, rather than to let commercial interests dictate the behaviors of our citizens. The commercial world has totally perverted traditional life. It has reduced people into Pavlovian dogs who secrete saliva at the push of a button.

There is no debate. We are not going to say please. The reproductive health of our peoples must not be corrupted by corporate psychologists who study how to make men more addicted to porn. The porn industry, —and the word ‘industry’ is as offensive as it gets here, implying its actors are cattle—, needs to be completely shut down.

The point is that the commercialization of human reproductive activity means humanity has already lost its reason to exist. As in Huxley’s novel Brave New World, or as in any ant or termite colony, sexuality and reproduction have been made wholly subservient to State interests, directed by a Queen, guarded by her lackeys.

Biologists call ants and termites “social insects”. Really? What’s social about having no mind of one’s own to think and to merely exist as a rule-following, neutered drone?

Herrenvolk

Human beings aren’t meant to be cogs in a giant profit-generating machine. I have a vision of establishing what the Germans once used to call a Herrenvolk, sometimes incorrectly translated as master race. Alternatively, one can translate Herr into the sense of the British “Lord”.

A Lord is a person of authority and influence, nobility who are free to do as they please, so a German Herrenvolk is more literally translatable as a “people of free men”. Note that Deutschland, the German name for Germany, literally translates as the “people’s land”—people as opposed to serfs and slaves.

An authoritative, influence people, then, is a Herrenvolk, i.e., a mature people largely capable of governing themselves under the umbrella of a small but dominant authority that guards a sensible morality and backs a religious order. We should pursue the politics of maturity and dominance, not of destitution and soul-murder. Let children be children, please but tell adults to be adults.

To succeed in our goal of transforming the present humiliation of being treated as children by the toddlers in power, we must recreate the traditional culture of initiation rites for teenagers, for both boys and girls.

How did societies of the past succeed in transforming their children into functional and responsible adults? They understood the power of initiation. Generally speaking, such rituals work as follows: In case of boys of around the ages of 12 to 18, at some point, they are removed from their mothers. They are taken to an unknown place where they are given a new set of clothes. Often they will wear the old clothes of soldiers or warriors of past generations.

Then, for one or more weeks, the boys are trained in the skills necessary to become mature male adults, no longer the property of their parents, but now introduced as equal members of their tribe.

In some cultures, boys were required to spend several days surviving on their own in the wild without any help. This complete isolation and abandonment instilled in them a need to begin thinking for themselves. It awakened in the sons of society their survival instincts. It taught men to rely on themselves, not to wait for orders.

Return of Men

If this is the experience you’re still looking for, I recommend taking a backpack to Northern Scandinavia and to hike along the King’s Trail by yourself for a few weeks. I remember returning home to the civilized world feeling deeply offended by the first pedestrian traffic light telling me to wait for green. For two weeks, nothing had made me stop walking wherever I pleased, until a machine monitored by a police force told me to.

This is how we wake ourselves up. Or as the lady from Lapland told me, “What a strange place this London must be. They have all these politicians there telling people what to do!” She was an Anarch. In her valley, there was no police force, and no politician had ever visited her town.

To this attitude we must all return, to tradition and family. To achieve it, we shall first make boys men again. Make them men who can withstand the world on their own, when necessary. This man, a Herr to his Volk, is psychologically mature, no longer childish. This man’s camouflage includes shades of black, brown, white, and red: the colors of dominance, maturity, supremacy, and leadership.

Never forget: None of us were put here on this earth to be obedient taxpayers. We are descendants of free men that came before us. We aren’t ants or termites. If we have to be anything at all, we should be lions.

The so-called modern age appears to us as time lost. It’s time to make up for it. It’s time to act. It’s time for a Reaction.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

It is disingenuous to say that the migration of large groups of strangers into another’s settled society is a phenomenon of all ages. No, modern mass migration is abnormal. We have never seen this before.

People have always lived as migratory groups, as nomadic pastoralists, or as hunters following herds and seasonal fruit crops, but throughout human history and prehistory, most migrations involved small groups of relatives moving away from other families. They were not moving toward each other.

People simply didn’t live with strangers. At most, we lived as clans of no more than 150 people, and in many cases barely 12, all of them relatives and their spouses and children. We certainly never moved into other people’s yurt tents and teepees, unless that was the outcome of a war. There was simply no reason to impose oneself onto others, since vast and fertile, unexplored lands always lay just beyond the horizon.

When conflicts arose—and they often arose—either between groups of strangers vying for the same natural riches, or between groups of relatives, i.e., different sides of the family now turned into rivals, the resolution was always that one group would pack up and migrate away, into uninhabited land.

If one such related group of people, a family clan, stumbled upon a particularly fertile strip of land, they would settle there for as long as the riches lasted. It made sense to try and protect access to these resources, such as wild herds or crop fields, from others who might find them appealing, as well.

Through the reproductive success of having many children, such fertile regions very quickly became overpopulated with one’s own kind. It made no sense, therefore, to invite others in for the sake of diversity. Why would you surrender what you have found to others who will take it from you?

Resource Protection

Over time, the need for protection of the natural resources under one’s control led to the development of the first human settlements and the earliest civilizations. Survival demanded that humans developed skill at controlling land, crops, water, shelter, animals, and even other people.

Some early groups of humans specialized in capturing herds, in order to domesticate them as pastoralists, usually in the more unpredictable areas of our planet where agriculture wasn’t possible, such as the steppe lands of Eurasia where many of our White ancestors hail from. These pastoralist races of people usually developed into aggressive warrior clans, for they had to defend their mobile assets, which could be stolen overnight, by hand.

Other groups of humans learned to cultivate areas of land meant for growing crops. But if you spent decades of your life removing tree stumps and rocks to make your soil fertile, would you surrender the fruits of your hard labor to whomever arrived at your door from faraway lands? Of course not. Even agricultural peoples had to deal with thieves stealing their supplies and equipment, or their grain stores, and so agricultural societies, since they can produce larger but more settled populations, developed specialized standing armies protecting their lands and borders.

Cities tended to start out as merchant hubs for doing trade with different peoples via land or water. Consider cities early warehouses where both people and goods could be stored for trade or profit. Indeed, the earliest city-states of Mesopotamia regularly captured wandering hunters and gatherers from the surrounding territories in order to enslave them in sweatshops, to make their captives produce clothing or apparel for wealthier, often distant customers.

As sources of material wealth, city-states and their elites logically developed a need for defending their wealth, and that’s why early cities developed behind tall city walls, namely to keep their slaves in, and to keep roving bands of robbers out. Soon, the competition between different merchant towns over the control of a region’s shared resources and people saw the birth of larger-scale military warfare, and the development of the first nation-states.

As has always been the case throughout human history, cooperation didn’t always make sense. If 12 people could defend their resources, they’d all live. But if 150 more arrived, they’d all starve together. Cooperation only works when resources aren’t constrained. That’s why most of human history is a history of conflict and greed.

Australia

The great migrations of the White Europeans since the modern Colonial Age still largely saw people migrating into empty lands, not into others’ pre-established societies. When the Anglo settled in Australia, they settled in the southernmost regions. That’s where they built their cities such as Canberra, Sydney, or Melbourne. But these regions were largely uninhabited. The darker-skinned aboriginals were living in the hotter desert territories of the North.

The Maori people of New Zealand arrived there around the 13th century AD from Polynesia. The reason no one complains about them is because they were the first arrivals. But surely, they can’t be racist now, right? So anyone can join their inclusive, multicultural, open border society, right?

It were the Aboriginals of Australia who, later, after the Whites had built their new country of Australia, which was named so by White people, started migrating into White people’s farmlands. The Aboriginal incursions into White territories presented a real pest. As hunter-gatherers who hadn’t domesticated animals, Aboriginals began killing and eating White people’s farm animals. They started robbing farmers’ croplands. It was for this reason that the Whites of Australia got into a conflict with the Northern natives and began sterilizing them.

South Africa

When Dutch explorers settled along the coastlines of Southern Africa’s cape, for the purpose of supplying ships along the sea trade routes from Europe to India, they settled there on empty land. The coastal regions of South Africa were uninhabited. Not even the Khoi-San were living there. The nearest people to be found were living at least 800 miles further inland.

As in the case of Australia, it were the blacks who eventually migrated into the White settlement. Attracted by the lure of an easier life, the Bantu blacks of Western Africa, murdering and pillaging their way through Central Africa, later arrived to Africa’s most economically prosperous zone, White South Africa. And through sheer fecundity, these Bantu blacks, who would also be shipped to the Americas as slaves, soon took over, even driving out and killing other groups of blacks.

The Afrikaner people had spent centuries building their own farms by cultivating the land. Whites hadn’t stolen anything, since blacks hadn’t built anything.

These invasive black racists, the Bantu peoples of Western Africa, who had also started the black slave trade in Ghana before handing it over to the Arabs, now rule the ANC party. These black communists have effectively stolen South Africa from the Whites that built it, to the point that the White South Africans are now looking to migrate away from these black colonizers, by transplanting themselves to Australia, Russia, the USA, or perhaps back to Europe.

South and Central America

The story of the Americas, too, has been rewritten into a story of evil White men. Those stories insist that Europeans brought germs and viruses over to the Americas that killed off the locals. That idea is entirely false. No evidence has ever been provided proving European germs killed the natives of the Americas.

In reality, the first Europeans to arrive to Latin and Central America failed to build permanent settlements and were driven back out. The lands of the Incas, Mayas, and Aztecs were densely populated and well-organized, for indeed, the locals had established elaborate, large-scale civilizations.

Think, for example, of the pyramids of Teotihuacan in Meso-America. By the thirteenth century, however, and we’re talking about a time at least 200 years before the first Europeans arrived, this massive civilization had collapsed all on its own, without any European involvement.

Why did Teotihuacan collapse, then, if germs didn’t kill them? That civilization died, because of overpopulation and because of its people’s inability to overcome technological challenges to continued population growth.

Come to think of it, it’s similar to what we are now witnessing in Europe. We have reached our limits to growth, too. Our native populations have been seeing a numerical decline since the 1990s. If nothing is done, we will have disappeared before the end of this century just like the people of Teotihuacan.

When Europeans first arrived to Latin America, they described vast lands littered with towns and cities full of people. When Europeans returned a full century later, however, they found the same towns abandoned and already overgrown by plants, swallowed by the jungle. But now, because local civilization had receded, the Spanish conquistadors were able to start taking over the remnants of a lost society.

The story that Europeans killed all the natives with their diseases and rifles is a fabrication of history that Southern Americans love hearing, because the truth of their past is a much more shameful story of failure and mismanagement. The natives of the Americas didn’t die because of Europeans. They died of starvation due to the collapse of their food supply.

Vikings in North America

The first Europeans to arrive in North America were initially also repelled by the natives. They were the Viking descendants of Erik the Red and his son Leif Eriksson. Not only did their crews reach Vinland, or modern-day Eastern Canada, the Viking sagas tell of men reaching as far south as what is presently the USA. There is a possibility that one group of Vikings, lost in a storm, even reached the tip of today’s Eastern Mexico, namely the region of Chichén Itzá.

There, in the Temple of Warriors, we find Mayan murals depicting a group of White-skinned men, but no women, as captives of darker-skinned men. The murals show their hands tied while being led down a street, as in a procession, to meet their fate. The final image shows a golden-skinned White man with long blond hair stretched over backward on an altar with his feet and hands held down by two darker men, presumably to have his throat slit and his heart removed in a ritual sacrifice.

The Icelandic Saga of Erik the Red furthermore tells us that, at Vinland, or modern day Canada, the Vikings encountered an overwhelming force of resistance from the natives. They were the ancestors of the Inuit and/or Beothuk. The saga describes a “great crowd of boats coming down on [the Vikings] like a stream”, after which the Norsemen “were now of opinion that, though the land might be choice and good, there would be always war and terror overhanging them, from those who dwelt there before them.”

Wait, don’t we have a couple of words for this kind of attitude? What kind of welcoming committee is that? Yes, we call it racism and xenophobia! The native Americans were racist xenophobes who discriminated against White Vikings just because the color of their skin. The Vikings had done nothing wrong but present the contents of their character. They initially offered to trade with the locals, but after the bull the Viking men brought with them scared the natives, the locals ran off and returned for war, forcing the Vikings to run to their ships and abandon Vinland.

The natives of the Americas had initially violently forced the first modern Europeans out. When Europeans later returned to the Americas, they arrived on bigger ships and with better weapons, but also to find that the local American civilizations had all but exhausted themselves naturally. Continuous conflicts and tribal warfare among the natives is what ultimately killed off the native North Americans.

Europeans had nothing to do with it. Besides, at their peak before the arrival of the Europeans, North America counted about 5 to 6 million Native Americans, but today, there are 9.2 million of their kind left living in the USA, i.e., more than ever before.

The Clovis Europeans

Then there’s the matter whether these Native Americans were even the original inhabitants of the Americas. It turns out there used to be an older, more ancient people who lived there, the so-called Clovis people and their descendants who settled in North-Eastern America.

Based on their stone-chipped tools, we know that the Clovis people couldn’t have come from Siberia, as was expected. They weren’t Asiatics. In fact, the first Americans were Europeans from the Iberian peninsula of South-Western Europe. These Europeans arrived to North America during the last Ice Age, when water had receded by some 200 feet, and an ice path was formed along Iceland and Greenland between Europe and North America.

These Iberian peoples were originally North Europeans who had been forced south to escape the ice that now covered Europe halfway through today’s France. These Europeans were the first human inhabitants of the Americas, but they were brutally and savagely eradicated, to the last man, by blood-thirsted Asiatics from Siberia.

The American Clovis people and their descendants were genocided. Coincidentally, other Asiatics would later also exterminate the Viking settlers of southern Greenland. The idea that only White men were colonizing, genocidal crusaders is, of course, historically laughable. European people have been genocided more often by others than the other way around.

I wonder, though, how come there are no memorials to the genocide of these ancient Europeans who once settled the Americas, long before the Sioux, Apache, and Comanche ever even existed? Even before the Incas, Aztecs, and Mayas existed? Technically speaking, if we follow the arguments of brown people living among us today, it means the Americas belong to Europeans, since we were there first.

We didn’t steal their land, they stole it from us. What all these indigenous movements can do, we can do. We can say to the descendants of the Sioux and the Mayans, “You are living on stolen land!”

The modern Europeans, i.e., upon our Great and Long-Awaited Return, also introduced horses to the Americas, for transportation, and soon started building railroads and waterways to connect agricultural lands with the bustling new cities. When Native Americans began attacking these European settlements, such as on the island of Manahatta, Manhattan, they responded by building Wall Street—named so, because it was a wall meant to keep the warlike Indians out of civilized society.

Invasions and Conquests of Europe

Now let’s for a moment appreciate all the different times other races attempted to invade Europe, long before Europeans ever became colonisers.

Were it not the Arabs who, after conquering all of North Africa during the 7th century, which used to be a region of Mediterranean White people, set their sights on Europe? Did these Arabs not invade and conquer Spain, and Rome, and then attempt to take France as well? In the year 732 AD, the Frankish armies led by Charles Martel beat back the Umayyad legions, preventing the Islamization of Western Europe.

Likewise, the Albanian warlord Skanderbeg, once abducted by Ottoman Muslims and raised as one of them, converted back to Christianity after his escape, and with the help of his native people, he delayed the Ottoman incursion into Europe long enough to allow other forces to gear up for battle.

The Ottomans had colonized Bulgaria for over 500 years, Hungary for 150, and parts of Greece even to this day. Twice did the Ottomans attempt to take Vienna, a strategic city along the Danube, namely at the Siege of Vienna in 1529, and at the Battle of Vienna in 1683.

During the mid-thirteenth century, the Mongol Hordes of Dhenghis Khan made their way into present-day Poland, raping Christian women and pillaging Christian lands, leaving nothing but terror and devastation.

If we, Europeans, are called colonisers for building countries such as Australia or the USA, then what do we call the people who only cared to destroy Europe?

British Indo-China

It wasn’t even until the 19th century that large groups of Northern Europeans, specifically Germans, sailed out in large numbers to the USA to become its largest immigrant group, after the Anglo had settled there, taking over from the Dutch.

When these modern Europeans moved to the USA, they weren’t immigrants. They weren’t even settlers. They were transplants, for when people of the same race or of a similar culture move into each others’ settled territories, they don’t arrive as invaders or colonizers. They are moving between two regions occupied by their own people, the way a strawberry plant sometimes clones itself by turning one of its branches into a new set of roots.

Moroever, most European émigrés to Australia, South Africa, USA, New Zealand or Canada were Protestant Christians trying to escape the Catholic Church and its armies, which made them religious refugees.

How very different are the modern “migrations” of people coming to us from primitive, backward places. Modern mass migration is totally incomparable, for example, with the arrival of the British to India. The British never engulfed India with White offspring. Rather, the British merely took over the Indian leadership, as the Spanish Conquistadors did in Latin America, and ended up improving India’s economic outlook to the benefit of all who lived there.

The idea that India’s 5,000-year old civilization was somehow the wealthiest place on Earth before Europeans arrived comes from this misunderstanding that a 100 million subsistence farmers were once living there. But they produced nothing of value and exported nothing. Both pre-colonial India and China may have had the largest human populations at the time, but individually, they were so poor that their states could hardly tax the people.

Europeans achieved more in just the past 500 years than both India and China have done in 5,000. I know that’s painful to hear, especially since feelings of shame so harshly affect them, but it’s the truth. Although Europe had a relatively small population compared to Indo-China, feudal Europe generated more taxes and was thus able to muster up a greater conquering force by investing in technology.

Note, also, that Europeans never colonized China. Why not? China was just as densely populated as India, but still better organized and more developed. The Chinese were, in the end, able to ward off European conquerors.

Modern Mass Migration Is Weird

That brings me to a discussion of the weirdness of modern mass migration. Looking at the USA and Canada. The arrival of hordes of Indians, Latinos, Arabs, and Africans resembles the collapse of native American civilization centuries earlier. It’s the same for Europe, where hordes of Indians, Muslims, Arabs, and Central Africans appear to be flooding the welfare programs and the kindergartens, if not also the public pools.

What is going on here? Why aren’t Europeans and White Americans fighting back against their tormentors? Is it because Westerners somehow can’t muster up the force to fight back anymore? In this world, you only get what you can conquer, and you only keep what you can defend. Or are we, White people, somehow dying of the foreigners’ diseases and germs?

No, we’re not. Clearly, what is happening to the West today is a tale of a dying, dwindling civilization that, because of the weight of its internal collapse, its own complexity, and its loss of competence and skill, can no longer defend itself against the newcomers, just as the American natives once could no longer repel modern Europeans.

Except, there’s a twist: Europeans arriving to the Americas brought with them a superior civilization, superior technology, and advances in many other fields, but the hordes now taking over North America and Europe don’t even bother using paper to wipe their hands, or can’t even use cutlery. Above all, they appear to be arriving in inflatable dinghies provided to them by the United Nations, if not by the Soros Open Society. They wouldn’t even have made the trip across alive without our help.

This is surely strange. Is it really the first time in human history that a people has voluntarily invited its own replacements? No, it’s not the first time. It happened to Spain right before the Islamic conquest, when certain merchants began inviting Muslim conquerors into Spanish city gates, then still ruled by the Gothic Germanic peoples. When it became clear what was happening, in 722 AD, when the Battle of Covadonga started, and a man named Pelayo started the Christian reconquest of the peninsula by establishing the Kingdom of Asturias.

A point of note is that it took approximately 781 years to complete the Reconquista and drive the Muslims back out. That’s what happens when you allow a subversive strand of people to take in your enemies.

The modern world built by Europeans is fading. When the blacks stole South Africa from Afrikaner rule, they made it worse. When the British seized India, they made it better. When the Europeans arrived to Australia, they introduced civilization. When the Indians and Pakistani take over England, England will collapse.

If we allow cousin-marrying foreigners to overrun our lands, we will be thrown back to the level of subsistence farming, barely getting by, living among the ruins of our ancestral glory. Our cities are at risk of fading away like the pyramids of Latin America. Once, centers of power and wealth, soon, relics of times forgotten.

What Soros and others are doing to the West could take a thousand years to undo. But perhaps, for those who are impatient like me, there is another way: a trick.

Masks Off

Meanwhile, White people are turning their backs on the cities their forebears once built. In fact, both leftist and right-wing White people are leaving the diverse cities at similar rates. They are migrating away and settling in the still pleasant suburbs, moving closer to nature, or even going off the grid.

The modern migrant forcing his way into the White man’s house may feel entitled to what he didn’t build, and could never have built on his own. White people, however, shall have the last laugh, as we prepare to improve our lives in ways others cannot. We are the avant-garde, again, the forefront, the first to leave urban civilization behind, to turn our backs on the machinations and regimentations of an oversaturated economic system, to free ourselves, and once again, begin exploring the world.

We’ve learned our lessons. We’ll never share our civilization with strangers again. Take for example the words of one so-called “black professor” from Canada, Ben Philippe, who published a novel in 2021 called Charming as a Verb, in which he wrote:

"When this race war hits its crescendo, I'll gather [all you White people] into a beautifully decorated room under the pretense of unity. I'll give a speech to civility and all the good times we share; I'll smile as we raise glasses to your good, White health, while the detonator blinks under the table, knowing the exits are locked and the air vents filled with gas.”

They want you dead. They want all of you dead.

This novel was advertised as “exploring the complexities of being a black teenager”. I can only assume part of those complexities involves suffering from psychopathy. It wouldn’t surprise me at all that underneath their thick skins, all minorities think like this. Author Philippe revealed the friendly mask minorities wear around us. As soon as they win the power, though, their masks will slip. As with the Clovis people, and with the Vikings of Greenland, they will murder us all.

It would be wrong, however, to call these minorities racist, for that is a big person’s word that eludes their tribal minds. Black and brown people live as clans of family members, just as the primitive family clans of prehistory. This is why such large numbers of them, after all, marry their first cousins, from 30% of marriages in Turkey up to 70% of marriages in Pakistan. They do so in order to avoid having to live with strangers, to avoid having to share their wealth with outsiders.

While they may say that some European royalty used to marry their cousins, too, the difference is that European people condemned it and shunned the practice. Europeans already avoided cousin marriages before Catholicism came along. And before you say anything, compare that Pakistani 70% to just 0.2% of citizens of Alabama. Pakistani people are 350 times as likely to marry their first cousins.

How did anyone think such people could be made compatible with our society of equality? They have no such concept.

See, the reason non-Whites call us racist so often and so easily is because White people tend to extend love to perfect strangers of their own race, even to strangers of another race. It is this act of kindness that elicits a disturbing sense of murderous envy among non-Whites.

The tribal man could never conceive of helping others outside of his immediate family. The idea of digging water wells to help other people seems an almost incomprehensible act to them, as though it were murder. A black man living in the USA, for example, might feel genuinely racially discriminated against whenever White people donate money to help other black Africans living in Africa, because the African-American man will be left wondering why he didn’t get any money?

See, those racist White people passed him over! That’s why they hate us! Because we are too kind. But won’t ever have to be again. Those days are over.

The Trick

If I may paraphrase exploring the complexities of growing up White in a multicultural society, such as The Netherlands, I would, per Ben Philippe, “gather all the non-Whites in our beautifully decorated cities under the pretense of equality. I’d hand them over all of our wealth, and the keys to all of our homes. I’d even throw in some prostitutes to keep men busy while the subway trains loaded with thermonuclear bombs ride into town, quietly unseen, knowing my fellow White people have already left the cities, and the roads and bridges leading out have been sabotaged.”

I mean all this in a literary sense, of course, for I could never think of doing something like this. But then again, our dwindling White birth rates may prove a benefit. The people with the larger numbers will forever be condemned to living in the most dystopian cities, and those cities will always be at risk of blowing themselves and everyone in them up.

I’m just saying, I think we’re going to be fine. Whatever happens next, one thing is for sure. White people’s future lies outside city walls. Even in case of a nuclear apocalypse, we could just reconvene on the steppe lands of Eurasia, or on the planes of North America, where we belong, and live happily ever after.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Will the USA betray the EU in exchange for a good deal with Russia? By deliberately destroying German industry, think of Nordstream 2, Europe will become a consumer market without its own means of production. American corporations can then enrich themselves with the help of Russian raw materials at the expense of European citizens.

Russia has already seized the valuable raw materials in eastern Ukraine. That, of course, was the purpose of the war: the wealth in the Donbass region. And while we are still waiting for the victory over the Russians that hysterical journalists have been promising us for three years, behind the scenes, Trump and Putin seem satisfied with the current outcome.

But because Europe has an aging population, we will have to welcome a massive migration of at least another 100 million people from the rest of the world, namely the essential consumers needed to keep the USA and Russia respectively powerful and wealthy. Europe will then be reduced to a slave plantation.

It therefore doesn't surprise me that of these three parties—Europe, USA, and Russia—only Europe has become truly feminist, and only Europe, as a submissive woman, submits to more dominant parties.

It doesn't have to be this way. We no longer need to allow ourselves to be enslaved. Our declining fertility was, of course, not an accident at all. It was the result of decades of brainwashing with propaganda that a second child would be bad for the environment and a third a mortal sin, while Mehmet, with 14 children from Afghanistan, gets three houses in a row here, granted to him by the municipality with taxpayer benefits—in other words, from people who could never afford such luxury themselves.

Who are these wise old women supposedly leading our continent? Kaja Kallas? Ursula von der Leyen? If they didn't see this coming, and if they didn't do anything to reverse course, they're complicit.

What has been done to us is the biggest trick in European history. Once again, we've been taken advantage of by parties we thought were our allies. Now we have only two choices: Finis Germania, accept the end, by submitting to General Varus of Syria as before, or by listening once more to the words of Arminius:

"Whoever loves his country, his parents, and their forefathers more than the despots and their new colonies, then follow the people to glory and freedom instead of the traitors to shame and slavery!"

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

This was the speech from livestream episode #84, reposted here as a separate video for reference. See here for the transcript.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

This was the speech from livestream episode #85 (click to see the transcript), posted here as a separate video.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Migrants don’t get paid less because they’re latecomers to dwindling Western economies. No! It must be because of their race, their skin tone, just because they look different!

Women don’t get paid less for the same work because they’re also a latecomer demographic added to a prop up a dying economy. No! It must be because of their crotch, their gender, their makeup!

We can only begin to understand leftists and leftism (progressive liberal disorder) when we accept that their entire reasoning about everything is based on bodily sensations. Their universe literally ends where their skin begins, whereas for right-wingers, our universe begins where our skin begins, and ends where the universe ends.

Of course, I believe there is a spiritual world where bodily sensations inform us of our gut feelings, our confidence, threats or fears, and so on, but to claim that these feelings somehow dictated how the universe ought to operate is a bridge too far. And this, I think, is where we find the biggest difference between left-wingers and right-wingers, for it is the difference between the body and the world.

Do you believe the causes for what goes on in the world lie within your own body? Then you’re probably a leftist. Do you believe the universe has its own causes, which may or may not affect your body? Then you’re probably a right-winger, at least psychologically speaking. This has nothing to do with your preferred political party or philosophical inkling.

It’s the difference between physiology and physics. So, where does the leftist preoccupation with their bodies come from? In leftist narratives, we often hear that people are “just bodies”, or bodies in motion. What does that even mean to them? It means they believe the whole universe exists within themselves, not outside themselves, and that, therefore, changes to the universe must occur within the body.

You may have guessed it by now: This is why liberals and progressives believe a man can be a woman. They genuinely believe they can alter the physical universe by changing their bodies. It doesn’t occur to them that they are merely misleading themselves. In some cases, they are mutilating themselves. The fact that other people don’t see how self-mutilation somehow changes one’s reality just means they’re ignorant, uneducated, or worse: fascist.

In this context, I believe their word ‘fascist’ is meant to designate “anyone who can still think rationally, reasonably, or logically”. A fascist is someone who can see difference, someone who understands cause and effect. These abilities, of course, are all the hallmarks of the equally defamed “White supremacy”. That’s why they say math is racist, because mathematical formulae don’t originate from our feelings, but from the rational world that lies beyond our control.

Once more, this is the difference between accepting an observable world that can only to understand, what we call reality, versus attempting to manifest one’s irrational, even hysterical feelings into new realities, but without plausible cause. The leftist denial of reality then leads to severe cases of self-delusion, so that this labor politician or that Democrat politician can say, “This demographic doesn’t do as well on standardized tests, and therefore, the solution is to give them more money.”

If only we would begin to perceive backward demographics as our equals, then they would become our equals. If we would call a man a woman, he would be a real woman. Or if we said, “we’re all one human race”, then it is magically so. Except, it’s not. But the body-oriented crowd can’t accept facts or truths. They believe facts only exist because fascists believe in them. Ergo, the Antifa crowd seek to attack those fascist believers and bludgeon the world into what they want it to be.

But hold on—what if they’re right? What if there really exist this superior ability to grasp and observe the reality outside our bodies, and that predominantly White men, white masculine right-wing men, the so-called racists and fascists who can see difference, have won, through evolution and struggle, the greatest expertise in precisely this field?

What if it is true that White people, in general, or White men, in particular, possess this uncanny ability to do science, to reason about cause and effect, to logically deduce the past from present observation, and to extrapolate past events into the future, so that we may repeatedly make the sort of predictions necessary to keep a highly technologized civilization operating?

You may say you want to decolonize the Western curriculum, but are you also prepared to move back into muck huts after we decolonize Western architecture? What are you really trying to achieve, if not the destruction of that which causes feelings of envy in your body?

Imagine now if the body-oriented people, i.e., those with a poor ability to perceive the physical, material world, were to take over a higher civilization designed by superior men with superior mental assets. They wouldn’t grasp an iota of our society’s technical complexity. They would not be able to even begin to study the root causes for both wanted and unwanted outcomes, nor that preparation and a tested, systematic approach to work matter.

Our society would crumble. On top of that, I have noticed that these body-oriented people tend to be feminine, by our standards, at least. And this surprises me, because it implies that most so-called minorities, namely the races of Africa, Asia, India, and Latin America, by and large supply the world with men who are, like women, much more body-oriented, rather than world-oriented.

My surprise also makes perfect sense. Despite the aggressive machismo put on display by certain alien races, and their apparent uncontrollable sexual urges to rape all that moves, I’ve observed that their attitudes are merely self-protective measures, namely to hide the fact that they hold a very poor grasp of reality’s inner workings. Their own inability to understand things offends them, yet they’ll willingly blame the White man for creating these inexplicable conditions.

The body-oriented people, made up of leftists, feminists, and minorities, appear to be stuck inside a mythical, motherly womb. They have been born into the world, but their minds have remained trapped inside their mothers. Doesn’t this sound plausible?

There is a famous Jewish saying from the Talmud that goes, “You cannot see reality how it is, but only how you are.” This, however, I think, betrays much about the Jews themselves, namely that they are people who cannot perceive reality how it is, only how they are. White European men are built differently. We can see the reality how it is. Per the Jewish saying, this makes us real.

The European patriarchal mind, then, distinguishes itself through its ability to pry into the real world and discover there its causes and effects, its mechanism, systems, its math, its physics, its formulae and its constants, its predictable nature. This, by no means, intends to discredit the female world of bodily feelings. Rather, the world of masculine science simply complements the sphere of the body.

However, it would be a catastrophic mistake to think that we must give preference to feelings over facts.

European scientists and philosophers and even theologians have together augmented our bodies with a greater understanding of what lies “out there”, culminating in space-age visions of distant galaxies teeming with intelligent life. If our superior abilities to see the reality as it is make us superior, then so be it. We should, at any rate, never feel any shame to it. We should be proud of our ability to see beyond the color of our skin.

This brings me to the fetishization of the human body, as leftists have done. They revel in torturing and mutilating themselves, from nostril piercings to the removal of body parts.

This is also why feminists, furious and angry, claim men denied them the vote. They don’t say that White American men invented modern democracy. If women cared so much about democracy, why didn’t they think of it? Why was it White Greek men who invented direct democracy at the Acropolis? How come all the African, Asian, Indian, and Latin American races came up with despotism as their only political innovation?

The point about despotism, here, is crucial. Despotism is the worship of the tyrannical baby, the dominant child. It is a society whose development has been wholly submitted to the needs of an aggressive baby. Indeed, this type of despotic society is, in fact, a feminist women’s society!

Let me repeat: Historically speaking, men invented democracy, but feminist women invented despotism. Women and minorities aren’t angry at White men for inventing the vote. They are angry that the vote offered White men freedoms outside an otherwise naturally despotic system.

The freedoms White men have won include, for example, exploration, colonization, and conquest, not by sheer force of moving one’s people into new lands, as with migration, but by first conquering other lands by means of mental domination, by introducing, for example, superior forms of governance and agriculture.

Through the imposition of his mental faculties onto lesser peoples, the White man won the world. It was the White man who first began dreaming of alien life inhabiting other solar systems, whereas, for example, Native Americans thought the night skies were a giant bear hide and that stars were small punctures through which that hide revealed a bit of sunlight. Certain African tribes used to believe that the moon was a giant gourd their ancestors once swung into space.

What we call primitive beliefs are really matriarchal beliefs. They are the beliefs of people whose minds are stuck inside their bodies. These people must explain their surroundings in terms of their own bodily anatomy, i.e., they are body-centric people. Thus, we see how a moon could be a gourd, and the sky could be a bear hide. But to imagine that the sky is really a vast empty space carrying other planets and stars governed by laws and constants—that is, indeed, a feat of White supremacy.

The feminist and minority aim is not, and has never been, to elevate themselves to the levels of understanding professed by the European intellect, but to impose on European advances a weight that may not be moved. This weight is meant to drag us down, as perhaps the boulder in the story of King Sisyphus.

And yet, we march on. Even the collapse of modern civilization won’t stop us, for our long-suppressed creativity, namely under the weight of maintenance and other obligations to keep things running, will find its outlet in new adventures and new endeavors. Shall we, perhaps, colonize the Sub-Arctic regions of our world next, and found the mythical state of Hyperborea where a new race of blue-eyed, blond-haired men shall evolve to prepare for the conquest of planets Mars and Venus?

The universe is not a giant womb. Although I feel strongly drawn toward the spiritual world, this doesn’t stop me from understanding, logically and rationally, the rest of the universe. I believe the physical universe itself may be yet another spirit, but one that moves at a much slower pace than we can observe, so that it may appear to us as immovable, such as space itself, or as mountain ranges, planets and stars.

But what we cannot move or change, we can study. What we cannot influence, we can learn to work with. This is what I call supremacy—a willingness to deal with the reality as it is, and not to impose fantastical delusions onto something we do not understand.

I believe there is a God, that people have a soul, a free will, and a mind of their own, and that there is also a physical reality separate from all of this. Making these distinctions, of course, is an act of fascism, according to feminists. They would like to erase the difference between their fantasies and the physical world.

But I think man was born as a being-in-between, i.e., as a link between God and the universe, and that, through us, through our bodies and minds, we may devise solutions, through hard work and creative endeavor, to ultimately, build the world we deserve.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

During this livestream, I briefly discussed the Trump Epstein problem, and then moved on to discuss the causes for our dwindling birth rates, and what to do about it:

Although Jordan Peterson is a falling star whose unexpected affiliation with dubious politics came as a betrayal to his White male book-buyer base, once in a while, the former Canadian psychologist shows us a glimpse of the genius he could have been if he had shunned wearing split suits. In his podcast episode #558, he discussed the original Snow White tale by the German Grimm brothers, and casually hands us a powerful weapon.

Discussing the nature of the Evil Witch who envies her daughter in Snow White, Peterson describes the witch as a Devouring Mother. Such a mother is, in essence, a caring figure, but her dark side, her shadow, compels the jealous mother to sabotage her own children instead of nurturing them.

Quoting Peterson from the aforementioned podcast episode,

“One of the things that you see in pathological families, is that the parents, who’ve made a house of their own life, become jealous of the unblemished possibilities and opportunities that lay themselves out in front of their children … [I]nstead of encouraging their development in the world, [the parents] start to regard the fact that [their children] haven’t been corrupted yet by laziness and spite, … they start to regard … the contrast between that childhood potentiality and their own wasted and pathological lives as unbearable … [T]o reduce the contrast, instead of straightening the hell up, so that they’re not embarrassed in front of their children, they discourage their children from moving forward and encourage pathologies in them, so that the competitive stress is lessened.”

The pathologies Jordan Peterson is referring to can be self-sabotage, self-hatred, even homosexuality and transgenderism. This isn’t a new insight. During the 1950s, for example, many psychologists working in the Western world agreed that homosexuality in men was largely caused by their disappointed mothers, i.e., mothers who had preferred a daughter to the son they had conceived, but who couldn’t hide their disaffection toward the child, thus forcing this unwanted son to try and behave more as a daughter than as a man, just in order to please his unhappy mother.

Quoting Peterson again from that same podcast episode,

“You see plenty of that, by the way, in the modern world, with mothers, for example, who utilize their demented identity politics with regard to their children—my boy is really a girl, my girl really a boy (there’s some fertility suppression!)—and use the notoriety generated by that pathologization of the child to elevate their social status among their idiot friends at the cost of the child’s happiness, physiology, and future reproductive success.”

What Peterson has correctly noted is that it’s not just this or that occasionally disappointed parent who is now supporting their child’s gender dysphoria into a full-blown, surgically irreversible condition. No, the society at large is now equally complicit in the industrial-scale attack on children and their genders, namely to produce a disaffected, sterilized, or castrated younger generation—meaning Gen Alpha and Gen Z—who can never be expected to succeed in life, since their forebears have actively sabotaged them to prevent their economic success. Few of these youngsters will likely ever own their own house, and that will further reduce the number of children these generations are expected to produce.

This leads to the threat of a possible extinction of the Western middle classes. But the original stories of Snow White, and also Sleeping Beauty, offer us a remedy, a spiritual antidote to the internalized self-sabotage of a sick society.

The strange, self-destructive nature of the West is explained as follows: In a declining civilization, families discover that they are increasingly coming up short, financially speaking, but also emotionally, due to the stress of a society deeply preoccupied with economic efficiency and the demands of technological progress. Technology itself, of course, precisely arises in such societies that are already having trouble generating the wealth needed to comfortably establish large families. The technology is supposed to make life easier, but technology then also adds to the complexity of the world, creating new problems of its own. When reducing one’s family size, then, already proves to be insufficient ino dealing with economic austerity, families may feel that the naturally competitive nature of their children must be suppressed by sabotaging them, by inhibiting the children, or by postponing their life’s milestones, for example, by sending them down the tracks of higher education and highly demanding careers.

It is just a matter of culture that, in the Western world, we have chosen to sabotage children using primarily transgenderism and homosexuality as the pathologies of choice. The whole LGBT spectrum is, in fact, unnatural, or rather, counter-natural, and meant to harm those who’ve adopted its lifestyles. In other cultures, for example, men can be discarded as unwanted, surplus males, then forced to migrate elsewhere, which is another phenomenon the West is having to deal with. While we are attacking the fertility of our own youngsters, we are absorbing insane levels of immigrants, because immigrants can be paid less and treated worse, and many migrants will accept lower standards of living, certainly much lower than the children of White middle class people are accustomed to.

By the 2020s, we’ve seen a ridiculous rise in cases of transgenderism, namely an over 1,000-fold increase from 1950s levels. And let’s not forget, the overwhelming majority of these cases involve boys now being raised as girls, and men thinking they can be women. The share of girls suffering from gender dysphoria is still relatively small. Up until the year 2000, there were practically zero registered cases of girls wanting to be boys in the USA. Girls doubting their gender is an entirely new phenomenon, but the causes for their transgenderism and (lesbian) homosexuality lie in the same root: A society that has become hell-bent on destroying the reproductive health of the younger generations.

The reason why I think transgenderism has become so “popular” is that homosexuality may still be a reversible condition, since it is non-destructive, and may depend on a certain mental feebleness on the part of the person suffering it, but transgenderism is all about permanency. Those who go on the track of having bottom surgery will, with great certainty, remain infertile for the rest of their lives. Transgenderism, then, has become a castration cult posing as a lifestyle, promoted as something “fun” to “try out”.

Of course, the trans lifestyle, though promoted as healthy, healing, and medically beneficial, will never cure anyone’s psychological distress, but will rather worsen it. Research from Sweden has proven that people who have undergone trans-castrations have become more, not less, prone to committing suicide. Once the definitive nature of their surgery sinks in, one can only wonder the mental turmoil that must grip these poor victims of a society that drove them toward making the biggest mistake in their life.

If parents are not involved in the sabotage of their children, now the school system will be. Perverted teachers, government officials, and journalists will hype up the LGBT spectrum, yes even to the point of transgendered males being rewarded with women’s sports medals, for example, after beating up a biological female in boxing. From here, follows the normalization of pedophilia, for that, too, suggests a reproductive impossibility by fetishizing infertile bodies, and so, removing sexuality from healthy reproductiveness.

Sex, as we can see all around us, has become a commercial activity, and access to women’s and men’s bodies has, in many cases, become a commodity traded over the transactional internet, if not to street corners. Women are selling themselves on Only Fans as much as men are trying to get in touch with them on dating apps.

What can we do to revert ourselves back to a fertile, virile society? Well, interestingly, Christianity may be the cure. Quoting Person on the role of the Prince in Sleeping Beauty,

“I remember that the evil queen in Sleeping Beauty, Maleficent, entraps the Prince in a castle. Her goal is to keep him locked up until he is so old that he can’t find a mate and reproduce. When he dares to challenge her, she turns into the dragon that devours eveything, into the full-blooded fury of nature itself in all its predatory catastrophy. He defeats her with a Cross on his shield and the sword of Truth, and advances through the thorns that she’s placed around Sleeping Beauty, so that he can find the princess. That’s the story of the young man’s heroic rejection of the destution of his life possibility and youth by the evil queen.”

Likewise, the Seven Dwarves from Snow White allude to the number 7 that is considered holy in Christianity, like the seven days of the week that were instilled upon Europeans under a Christian influence. There may be a quiet hint, here, as to why heathen Europeans ultimately converted to Christianity—because unlike the heathen beliefs, Christianity promoted fertility and reproduction. Perhaps it was under the shield of Christianity that low-fertility heathen populations were awakened, anew, to break through the walls of self-sabotage, and to pursue a more virile version of life.

In other words, Christianity was once considered a radical counter-culture that young people adopted in order to go against their less ambitious parents, namely, by having large families again, and thus, reviving their race. This doesn’t mean I am offended by the great mythology of the Norse, nor by stories of Odin and Thor. Thor, in particular, whose hammer represents a phallus and, therefore, male fertility, is matched by Freya, the goddess of female sexuality and love. The more overtly sexual character of Thor and Freya may, in fact, have been a response to the fertility of the early European Christians, i.e., a partly revised Norse mythology was the heathens’ attempt at increasing their own birth rates, to ward off the demographic successes brought about by Christian missionaries.

If you are planning to rewatch the Disney classics, make sure to at least watch the Snow White version of 1937, and the Sleeping Beauty version of 1959. The more modern versions of these films have come under the very spell of—you guessed it—feminist Devouring Mothers. Feminists have attempted to sabotage the very stories, both heathen and Christian, that used to expose their evil. They have, for example, in the recent Snow White film starring Renée Zegler, perverted the Dwarves into a troop of suckers who don’t know how to take of themselves, whereas in the original story, the Dwarves are hard-working patriarchs who support Snow White.

How did this happen? How did Western societies become such a hostile place, so detrimental to the health, success, and wellbeing of their own offspring? And all the while Western families have been steadily reducing their family sizes, down from 6 during the 1900s to just barely 1 or 2 by the 2000s, but now by age 35 instead of by age 25, we have started massively importing precisely the six children of Sub-Saharan African women, the two or three from Hindu women in India, as well as the surplus of unwanted Muslim sons from the Arab world, if not also the children from Latin America that their societies have equally discarded.

Western people are most certainly responsible for their own demise. I never said immigrants were the cause of our problems. I said immigrants were the consequence of our decline. To reverse course, however, Western people, as in the stories of Snow White and Sleeping Beauty, must rekindle their reproductive fitness on their own, from within, by breaking away from the forlorn boomer world, by revitalizing certain strenghts buried deeply within our psyche.

We cannot dismiss this insight that we, too, have become a slumbering society. Our leaders are evil witches whom we must defeat. The hundreds of millions of migrants are like the wall of thorns that we must burst through in order to have a future. Again, we must embrace Christianity’s fertile faith and take to heart this lesson to “go forth and multiply”. Christianity, then, shall prove to be, for the second time in our European history, the weapon of choice in the fight against our dwindling numbers.

That leaves me a brief discussion of Jordan Peterson’s character and intentions. He publicly refuses to call himself a Christian, despite just having handed us that very Christianity as a patriarchal weapon to destroy immigrant birth rates with increased birth rates of our own. So, what is he really after? I’m not sure. I don’t trust him. Maybe his excellent telling of the meaning of Snow White’s tale is really a plot to increase birth rates for White women, just not with White men. Perhaps he, too, is just another globalist who thinks White women should be mated with the incoming Africans and Arabs.

After all, isn’t that why Peterson’s daughter ended up in Mongrel Tate’s suffocating, Islamic arms? To promote Muslim halfrican mutts to White women? Alas, the White women aren’t falling for the Tates and have already massively (r)ejected the brothers from the cultural sphere.

Either way, my advice to the White men of the West is simple: Be a radical, be the counterculture, have a traditional family,

and tell your sons, with sword in hand, and Truth in mind,to drive all migrants off our land.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

I introduced the livestream with a talk about how different environments modulate human behavior and culture. And then I turned to the main topic, which were the migrant riots in Torre Pacheco, Spain:

Locals from the Spanish town of Torre Pacheco, located in the country’s south-eastern region of Murcia, just south of Valencia and Alicante, decided not to lavish violent Moroccan migrants with praise, but rather to hunt them down and teach them a lesson after violent youths brutally attacked an elderly man. Yet, the Western mainstream media, all in unison, decided to cry foul and accuse native Spaniards of being organized right-wing extremists. But why?

The hunt for violent migrants triggers fear, not only in the migrant populations, but especially in the leftist extremists professing a sort of White man’s burden, in that they think that White people are supposed to be responsible babysitters while immigrant children burn down our societies.

In Torre Pacheco, a town with a population of just 35,000 people, over 30% of the inhabitants are now migrants, most of those from Morocco, and many of them illegal, despite Morocco being a relative safe-haven. It is not a war zone. Morocco is not being bombed by the West, either.

Johannes MK is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Moroccans have simply given birth to too many children without caring to offer them a future in their shitty economy. That’s no one else’s fault but their own, and it certainly isn’t the responsibility of Europeans to, now, absorb Morocco’s unwanted young males.

Let’s not even make that distinction between legal and illegal immigration. Every non-European migrant is one too many in Europe. The European Union seems to have adopted the dogma of George Soros and his Open Society Foundations that Europe must absorb 1 million migrants per year, minimum, and supposedly indefinitely, until White Europeans have either been erased or civil war settles the score.

Well, civil war was has arrived. Southern Spain, apart from its tourist destination, isn’t considered a rich region of the world, either. So when violent Moroccan thugs beat up a grandfatherly man, a 68-year-old, his bludgeoned eyes sparked a flame in the hearts of local Spaniards. Genetic memories of the Reconquista must have driven their actions, perhaps guided by the spirit of El Cid Campeador.

Who could blame them? But does a spontaneous response qualify to call these locals ‘right-wing extremists’, as even American media have done, just because their actions were announced in a shared Telegram or WhatsApp group? No, these locals likely have no political affiliations other than being fed up with the uncontrolled violence of an increasing number of unwanted guests. Why, after all, should any people sit by idly while foreign people, with the full protection of the law, can take over one’s town?

The White backlash over unwanted immigrants does threaten to pop the liberal feel-good bubble. It turns out there are limits to diversity, and Europeans aren’t naturally going to allow foreign hordes to extinguish them with higher birth rates and racially motivated sexual violence.

Western leftists are so embedded in their woolly vanity project called diversity and inclusion, that they refuse to accept that migrants can be perpetrators, too. They prefer explaining away any backlash against violent foreigners, rapists, murderers, thieves, and other cognitively impaired weirdos by claiming that the migrants are the real victims. How does that even work?

This, they say, is because violent, extremist migrants really are like small children who need to be raised and educated into Europe’s future doctors and engineers, though IQ tests already prove otherwise.

We can all suspect that Western feminism, which has put many liberal women into positions of power, plays a role. Instead of using their power to protect their own people, these White feminist women are guided by their frustrated mothering instincts and, instead, choose to provide cover for violent animals. It’s a form of Stockholm Syndrome, whereby the victim chooses her own perpetrator.

Our justice systems, all over the Western world, have drafted up excuse after excuse to exonerate insane levels of migrant violence. In Germany, one judge told a girl, who was gang-raped by 8 foreigners taking turns for over 3 hours, that her rapists were simply traumatized by the fact they migrated to Germany, and therefore, they should not be punished harshly. When another person took to the internet to complain about this verdict, that person was sentenced to a month longer in prison than the gang rapists due to alleged “hate speech”.

It is, indeed, considered hate speech for a German to say they love Germany.

See, the liberal consensus is that when white men rape, it’s because of their ingrained genetic ‘whiteness’, because white men, as everyone knows, are born inferior beings whose only remedy is to be sent to jail, castrated, killed, or purged in an oven. But when brown men commit much more heinous crimes at far greater frequencies, both in relative and, increasingly, in absolute numbers, liberal judges will staunchly acquit those foreign sickos on the grounds that they suffer from a range of cognitive impairments, including having a low IQ, having a trauma, or being actually inbred.

This is one of those hard to understand ‘features’ of the Western justice system. It says that people who cannot be held responsible for their violent actions must, therefore, be let loose among the public, so that they can strike again, and harm even more people. Instead of directing violent migrants to permanent supervision in mental hospitals, we unleash them upon the next unsuspecting victims, without warning.

There is a deliberateness to it. One suspects that Western judiciaries have received orders from above, not only to acquit murderous foreigners, but to criminalize natives who dare to resist. Is it, perhaps, all part of the mystical Kalergi Plan to set native European women and girls up for their industrial-scale mass rape? By protecting foreign combatants and their sexual terrorism, we are effectively orchestrating the mass rape of Europa.

Testament to the European character, our morale hasn’t been broken yet. When the locals of the town of Torre Pacheco took to the streets, they vowed to burn down the hallmarks of Islamic squatter colonialism, namely the proverbial kebab and mosque, the barracks of Islamic hate.

Leftist politicians blame the right-wing politicians of Spain’s Vox party for escalating the riots. Vox recently announced their plan to deport at least 8 million migrants from Spain, including migrants’ children born in Spain. It is an example all of Europe should follow. Europeans should counteract the twisted Soros Open Society plot by doubling the number of deportations to at least 2 million per year.

The idea that Europe should have to absorb the discarded, low-quality populations from the rest of the world needs to die an ignominious death. Not all ideas are equal, and diversity and multiculturalism stands out as particularly moronic.

The leader of Spain’s Vox party, Mr. Santiago Abascal, responded to leftist accusations by saying the migrant rapes and knife stabbings had been entirely the Left’s fault. We can only hope that Torre Pacheco becomes Europe’s ground zero in the war against unwanted immigrants. However, I feel that street violence can only be so effective. The real target for our backlash ought to be that weird liberal psychology that insists migrants are poor and needy people who need our help.

It’s time to confront the mentally feeble leftists in charge of our institutions with this reality that single, male migrants are, in practice, hostile foreign combatants. They are enemy soldiers. They didn’t come for help. They came to exploit and rape.

We, Europeans, still possess every means necessary to throw them out of our countries. We have every moral right to defend our homelands. There is no reason to submit ourselves to the fantasies of self-hating liberal elites. So let us take after the brave Spaniards, brace for impact, and revolt!

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Thank you to everyone who tuned into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app.

Imagine if the United States would betray Europe by siding with Russia, but only after German and Polish soldiers have been discarded in the war in Eastern Ukraine? And imagine that France, then, will pivot the European Union toward China, making Europeans the slaves of the Chinese middle class?

A report by French parliamentarians titled “number 1588” raised eyebrows last week, claiming that the present European Union laws are too pro-American. Europe, say the radical-leftist authors of the La France Insoumise political party, should pivot toward China. Meanwhile, Trump’s USA indeed appears to be flirting with Russia. How does any of this make sense?

The short answer is that a new geopolitical constellation is emerging, no longer explained in terms of East versus West, but soon in terms of North versus South. The question is whether the European Union as we know it today will stay intact, or whether Northern and Southern Europe may split up accordingly.

One thing is for sure, namely that any change in the global status quo implies a diminishing American influence under a rising Chinese star. Western elites may benefit greatly, but their peoples will suffer dearly.

France

Concerning France, all this has something to do with the way French elites make a profit. For example, France presently controls several West-African nations, including two of the largest cocoa producers, namely Ghana and the Ivory Coast, needed to produce overpriced French bonbons and Swiss-branded chocolate.

Chocolate may be just one example, but France’s hidden West-African empire grants it the resources for selling overpriced fluff to the world, such as French cuisine and luxury goods, to global consumer markets—nowadays predominantly to the Chinese middle class. This is why, after all, French President Macron visited Xi Jinping pitching precisely this idea of “European autonomy”, which, in practice, means Chinese-style communism for European citizens.

When Moscow, last week, officially declared France its primary enemy in Europe, the Kremlin didn’t do so just because France, unlike Germany and Poland, has nuclear weapons. No, France has such weapons, because the nation of trans-lover Emmanuel Macron has to protect its commercial investments in the African colonies.

Burkina Faso

Putin’s Russia and Russian special forces are threatening to conquer these former French colonies. In the nation of Burkina Faso, one such French colony, a man named Ibrahim Traoré has seized the nation’s throne, but of course, in the shadows, with the help of Russian forces, thus prying Burkina Faso away from French influence.

With Russian and Chinese help, Burkina Faso has managed to build an infrastructure of its own, including factories, so that it can now produce its own wealth—meant to be export to Russia and China, and elsewhere. Just recently, the military leader, Traoré, declared it will no longer export any of its national treasures to European buyers. Burkina Faso has also revamped its justiciary in local dress, and has vowed to establish its own Central Bank.

This level of African independence makes perfect sense for Africans, as long as they are aware that Russia and China will ultimately become their main benefactors and importers.

Ukraine

Concerning the war in Ukraine, Putin, of course, will not even attempt to conquer all of Ukraine, since the largest stores of most valuable resources are buried in the Donbass region of the East, which Russia has already successfully captured, despite hysterical Western media trying to manifest victory. Russia’s war has already switched from offensive to defensive.

The store of Ukrainian wealth is so great—making Ukraine the richest country in Europe in terms of resources—that Putin has gained the leverage to win over corporate America. So, an alliance with Russia is about to become beneficial to the US economy. This is why you saw Secretary of State Marco Rubio shake hands with Russian foreign minister Lavrov, and why Putin, all of a sudden, offered the USA support to protect Israel.

With access to Ukrainian wealth via Russian channels, the Americans no longer need an impoverished Europe. The USA can then stop having to defend Europe, offering Americans an enormous relief of costs spent, for example, on defending its allies in NATO. The break between Europe and the USA, therefore, is real and shall prove lasting.

Germany

We are pivoting from the East-West dogma toward the North-South dogma, however, only in preparation of a wider global collapse, The result will be a world falling apart into its former regional spheres of influence, and that opens up a particular opportunity for a German revival during the second half of this century.

For now, a German alliance with Russia remains unlikely, since linking up German industry and the EU markets with Russian resources poses a mortal threat to the Anglo-American powers. As long as the USA can afford to keep its foot in Germany’s mouth, the German economy will continue to wither away into irrelevance.

But once the American economy itself begins to crumble under the weight of its unmanageable diversity, its Indian scammers, and the revolt of the White warrior class, then Germany and the Germanic peoples of Europe could reassert themselves as a sort of new Holy Roman Empire dominating the European continent in a diplomatic alliance with Russia.

Europe

For us Europeans, we may find that we shall have to become the new Iranians—by which I mean a society ruled by a theocracy, in our case Catholic, slowly chipping away at American power, until we emerge from the rubble as the new dominant force in Europe, while defeating France and regaining independence from China.

I can foresee Europe, after the collapse of the global economy, returning to a system of feudal states, where slavery will be reintroduced, and darker-skinned immigrants living in Europe will be declared the property of their masters. But if we don’t rebuild Europe into a Catholic theocracy, we shall instead become a third-world Islamic backwater ruled by foreign tyrants.

The choice is ours.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Black people say, “White people don’t have a culture!” And yet, they are wearing European clothing styles, European apparel, speaking European languages and using European/American technology invented by White people. What is the name for this cognitive disorder? While we shouldn’t make fun of people with disabilities, it is important that we correct the record and get to the bottom of this psychotic subversion.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

I spoke about the Manchester Airport attack, about higher education as a belated mating strategy, about education in general not serving the needs and competencies of young people. And then I spent a deal of the stream talking about two EU reports about “Europe’s far-right crusaders”, i.e., reactionary European organizations trying to beat back against the progressive gender ideologies.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

I introduced this livestream with a chat about Hollywood morality, and about the subversion seen in the movie Superman 2. Then I gave my monologue about NATO’s alliance disintegrating. Buy me a coffee.

For three years now, Western media have been manifesting victory over Putin’s troops in Eastern Ukraine, but so far, Russian drones flying on parts allegedly sourced from second-hand washers and dryers are dominating the battlefield. In an obvious act of revenge, Russian drones have just recently been stoking Ukrainian towns far beyond the Russian border, especially hitting the capital of Kyiv hard.

I remember when American neckbeard leftists were all changing the spelling of Kievan Chicken into Kyivan Chicken to show solidarity, but these Western manifestations haven’t materialized on any other platform but the websites of traditional media. Now, Putin’s weakness is supposedly showing by Russia’s limited support for Iran. This is a political oxymoron, since apparently, despite having nearly been defeated by the West, Russian can still supply military and financial support to foreign nations.

Meanwhile, Slovenia’s president Robert Golob has issued a plebiscite, a referendum, to ask the Slovenian people whether they want to stay in the NATO alliance, or get out. Slovenia has barely 2 million inhabitants, anyway, and they’re not ready to cough up the 5% GDP demanded of NATO allies by President Trump. Other Central- and Eastern European countries, such as Hungary (a country of 10 million) and Slovakia (a country of 5.5 million) will be keeping an eye on the Slovenian referendum. Hungary and Slovakia, too, are critical of the European Union, of NATO, and quite supportive of Russia.

Russians, for example, are helping Hungary construct a nuclear power plant, though with the help of French and German workers. Hungary also sources plenty of affordable Russian gas through the TurkStream pipeline that runs through Turkey. Hungary’s leader Viktor Orbán is a fan of Donald Trump’s, but only on the social and moral issues of immigration and Islamization. Militarily speaking, Orbán has consistently denied an interest in war with Russia. Hungary, for example, refuses to ship weapons to Ukraine, and opposes Ukraine’s acceptance into either NATO or the European Union, which would force all European men to go to war with Russia.

Eastern European nations have barely been introduced into the European Union, and already their populations are wondering whether joining the EU was a mistake. So far, the borderless union has seen skilled personnel leave for work in Germany or elsewhere in Western Europe, whereas Western corporations have colonized much of the Eastern Europe’s commercial life. Due to the arrival of Western nomads, housing and rent prices have only skyrocketed, while growing Eastern European salaries have yet failed to bring them relief from relative poverty.

Eastern Europe, of course, for a long time, belonged to the Soviet Union. The switch to Western Europe and to the North Atlantic sphere of alliances was supposed to bring Eastern Europe considerable wealth, not to be exploited by France and Germany to pay for their economic deficits. Moreover, in case of a war with Russia, Eastern Europe finds itself in the line of fire. Do you really believe Poland, for example, will be looking forward to dying for American and German corporate interests after what the Germans have done to Poland during the Second World War? They joined the EU for the money, but perhaps they will revert to the Soviet Union to save their lives.

But it’s not just small countries trying to get out from under NATO’s obligations. Romania is feeling uneasy with its NATO partnership. Spain, too, doesn’t feel like paying up the requested 5% of GDP. Italy and Greece are struggling to curb—or rather, facilitate—the unrelenting mass migration coming to Europe from North Africa and the Middle East. Recently, Cyprus has been designated a refugee hub for Gaza Palestinians driven out by Israel. Cyprus will be the new Lampedusa, a thoroughfare to ultimately get migrants onto trains toward Germany and Britain.

Considering that 70% of casualties in the Eastern Ukrainian war zone, today, in the Donbass region, now come from unmanned drones exploding in men’s faces, even the use of tanks has come under scrutiny, since drone parties flying in formations of six or seven drones, can easily target tanks who have no meaningful defenses against them, except for carrying metal bird cages to prevent drones from blasting too close to the cockpit. Still, then, the drones can hit the tank’s undercarriage and destroy its tracks. Regardless, a series of drones blowing up against tanks or other vehicles will ultimately drive their occupants out, after which remaining drones will target the humans trying to flee their burning vehicles.

There is no more honor to be found in war. War is now a human wood chipper. One might even wonder whether human lives need to be spent in battle at all, if we can just pit our drones against each other and call it a day.

Russia is winning the drone war, and Putin’s nation is also casually producing over three time the weapons, bombs, and vehicles the EU nations are currently producing. If there were lessons to be learned from the Second World War, when the German armies failed to capture Stalingrad, and were then driven back by the Red Army, it’s that the Soviets were simply out-producing the Germans in terms of weapons, bullets, and bombs. The outcome of war isn’t always decided by sheer explosive might, but in the case of the present European Union, I wouldn’t count on any military genius outsmarting the Russians.

The EU’s best idea, to date, has been to hit Russia with more sanctions. The idea came from George Soros, the founder of the Soros Open Society Foundations, who once wrote, in an article published on Project Syndicate, that Russia was just a “gas station” with an economy no greater than that of Spain’s. The comparison ends there, since the vast Russian land mass contains enough raw materials and cheap labor to sustain a full-frontal war on the West for at least another 100 years, whereas Spain is largely a desert that would run out of fresh water within a week. Spain could never defend itself against Russia alone.

Never mind that the so-called Russian sanctions have barely dented Russia’s economy, but have rather put Europe’s biggest industry, Germany’s, in a painful position. No longer able to run on cheap Russian gas and oil, Germany has been forced to make itself dependent on American liquid natural gas, and on gas from Qatar. This switch from an Orthodox Christian supplier to a fundamentalist Islamic supplier of fossil energy has, of course, brought with it stark cultural change. It is the real reason that Europe must open its borders to Islamic immigration, namely to win contracts with the Arabs.

This switch from Russian to Arab oil was already announced in 1975 in a document called the Strasbourg Resolutions. It came after the oil boycotts of 1973, which temporarily shut down North-Western Europe’s modern industry. In a secret deal with the Arabs, Europe agreed to start promoting Islamic culture, and to, at least publicly, denounce Israel. In practice, European nations have remained staunch supporters of Israel, while, at the same time, allowing mass migration of Islamic immigrants, believing they could somehow integrate Islam and create a mellowed European version of Islam.

This hasn’t worked out, very well, has it? We’ve imported debilitating levels of foreign rape and crime, to the point where young White women in their 20s are now turning to the far-right, demanding mass deportations. If Europe has to become Islamic and diverse to beat Russia, then we’ve already lost.

The Russian sanctions have backfired. Putin, according to Western news sources, has instructed his generals to deal to Europe the blow Europe intended for Russia, namely, to destroy Europe economically. After all, if Russia is just a gas station, then Europe is just a museum. I believe it entirely within the realm of possibilities that Russia will succeed in draining Europe’s resources in a protracted war of attrition. Europe will slowly bleed itself dry financially, whereas Russia will slowly gain strength by drinking our blood.

I say this because I think it reasonable that the United States is happily throwing Europe under the bus. Europe may be used to slow Russia down, while the USA prepares for its new future as an Afro-Indian technocracy. Where will that leave White people when Europe turns into an Islamic third world hellscape, and the USA turns into another India? We might almost be better off moving to Eastern Europe. As with the collapse of the Roman Empire, the Eastern Byzantine Empire lived on.

If Western Europe goes down, Eastern Europe might be the only place on Earth to remain relatively White and Christian.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this livestream episode, I spoke about the Epstein List (or really, the Maxwell List) and its implications. Follow me on TikTok to stay informed about livestreams (mo-thu, 8pm Amsterdam time, UTC+2).

Just over 60 seconds of midnight footage from the cameras looking at Jeffrey Epstein’s jail door have gone missing. The footage from the New York City prison was supposed to quell conspiracy theories about what happened to America’s most famous child trafficker, but now it has fueled only more wild speculation.

Did Epstein, the Jewish math dropout who decided to swap working in finance for supplying underage children to be raped by America’s Who’s Who, really commit suicide, or was he murdered? Or was his body swapped by a body double in a Rudolf Hess-style plot, and did he flee to Paraguay or Argentina with a good pension, as so many other Mossad agents have?

Now that his co-conspirator and disturbed girl lover Ghislaine Maxwell was put in jail for 20 years, it’s a mystery why, all of a sudden, there is no Epstein List anymore. But I’m not talking about any list that Jeffrey Epstein supposedly drafted. We’re talking about the list of Epstein’s victims and the perpetrators they can still identify.

We could, for example, simply ask the girls that pointed out Ghislaine Maxwell as their handler and rapist. They could tell us who else raped them, not only at the infamous Epstein Island and its occult architecture, but also at his place in New York City, or aboard of the so-called Lolita Express plane, and anywhere else the rich elites convene.

So, where’s the Maxwell list, then? We know, for sure, that Britain’s Prince Andrew was on the list, since his victim Virginia Giuffre pointed him out. Perhaps to shut up other victims who might potentially come forward, Giuffre appears to have died of suicide after suffering an alleged accident (that no hospital or ambulance worker had any knowledge of), despite her father saying she was making plans for the future the week before she passed away.

Attorney General for the Trump Administration, Pam Bondi, a while ago claimed there was a list and that she had it. Now there’s no list?

The list of customers is just one list. We’re more interested in the other one, the one listing blackmailable elite men, and perhaps several women, from the tech industry, from finance, and politics, who were blackmailed into working with domestic and foreign secret services, because their “activities” with underage girls were secretly recorded, and so being used against them in order to get them to cooperate.

We know, for example, as several U.S. media outlets previously reported, about names such as Microsoft founder Bill Gates who flew on Epstein’s plane. What on Earth is going on in this managed reality?

This brings me to the timing of the FBI’s and the Department of Justice’s sudden memory loss. You see, President Donald Trump was big long-time friends with Jeffrey Epstein. There is a video taken by NBC News of a younger Trump cracking jokes with Epstein, with Ghislaine Maxwell featuring in the video’s background, at a kitschy house music party at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago in Florida.

And then there’s the world-famous picture of Trump with Epstein and a dancing Melania right in front of them. In fact, Epstein introduced Trump’s future wife to him. What sort of girl was Melania that she hung out with Epstein? I know, maybe you know too, but I guess I better not say anything.

My point is this, concerning the timing of the disappearing list: It was right after Trump supported Israel’s Netanyahu during the recent 12-day war with Iran, bombing Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, and after Trump personally backed “his friend” Netanyahu to clear him from charges in the trial against the Israeli leader back home. Then followed a dinner with Netanyahu at the White House to celebrate victory, whereupon “Benji” offered Trump the letter he sent to the Nobel Prize Committee to recommend Trump as a candidate.

It was right during this dinner photo-op moment that the FBI and DOJ came out saying they no longer have any knowledge of any Epstein blackmail list. Of course! Allegedly, Trump is the most prominent celebrity featuring that list. But of course, that would be shocking news, to hear that a presiding President is being manipulated by a foreign Secret Service, the Israeli Mossad.

Still, Republicans may be rarely featured in the dealings with Epstein and his girls. Former Presidents Clinton, Obama, and Biden may also have wanted to see the list disappear.

The American Uniparty doesn’t care to ask any further questions. If you still want to know more, I recommend the book by Whitney Webb titled One Nation under Blackmail. And then you may begin to understand why American politicians say “Israel is our Greatest Ally”.

In fact, if you wanted to homeschool yourself and reconstruct the Epstein List with the least amount of effort, all you would need to do is to turf the names of the men and women in politics, media, and in tech and finance who have publicly spoken these words: “Israel Is Our Greatest Ally”. Then, the list you have in your hands would resemble closely the missing list the FBI says it can’t find anymore.

The United States government, along with its entire media system, has been compromised and cannot be expected to make independent decisions in the benefit of its citizens. What about the 20,000 hours of video recorded by Epstein and confirmed by the FBI? What about that American officer who defected to Russia after seeing the contents of this material?

Perhaps the breaking story should be about how many other world leaders are all being controlled? I already gave you the answer: I think it’s all of them, at least all the important ones. For sure, no leader in Europe is making any independent decisions, and the EU witch in charge, Ursula von der Leyen, takers her orders from the small hats, too, apparently, as she equated European values with the values of the Talmud.

Apart from Benjamin Netanyahu and Isaac Herzog, there shouldn’t be any other Jewish Presidents or Prime Ministers in the world, yet there’s Volodymyr Zelenski, the President of Ukraine, there’s Alexander de Croo, the Prime Minister of Belgium, there’s Javier Milei of Argentina, Mark Rutte of The Netherlands has Jewish ancestry, and Keir Starmer of the UK recently outed himself—he supports Zionism because he has Jewish family in Israel, and he is raising his children as Jewish.

Then there’s Claudia Scheinbaum, the President of Mexico, there was Gabriel Attal, the recent Prime Minister of France, and let’s not pretend that France’s President Emmanuel Macron isn’t Jewish, or pretend that Giorgia Meloni of Italy isn’t Jewish, there’s Alexander Rozenberg, the Jewish leader of Transnistria, there’s Mikhail Mishustin, the Jewish Prime Minister of Russia, Andrejs Rozkov of Latvia is Jewish, and so is Xavier Bettel, the Prime Minister of Luxembourg.

It is so important to either be Jewish, look Jewish or work for Jews on the political stage that even dictator Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela claimed to be Jewish, and so did Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa of Portugal. And then there’s all those hidden noses who just pretend not to be Jewish, but pass as White, Christian, Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Arab, Muslim, Indian, Hindu, or even East Asian nowadays. Some say even the House of Saud has been handed new noses to get them looking Israel’s way.

Don’t tell me this isn’t a problem, because these global schemers want you and me and every other White man to die fighting Russia, Iran, and China, so that makes it my personal damn interest to know who these people commanding my race on the battlefield really are. Already over a million White Christian men have died fighting in Eastern Ukraine, and nowadays most of them, almost 70% of them, die because of drones exploding in their faces.

I want this human sacrifice to stop, because we needed those White men, and women, to help us repopulate the diverse cities of Western Europe. We could have been fighting Islam and immigration together. We could have driven out all the hate and terror. Now, their lives have gone to waste serving the globalist interests of a clique of people who won’t even bother to explain their motives, although that doesn’t mean those motives are hard to guess—it’s about total control of the global trade systems, effectively, to own the world.

That’s it. Our enemy is motivated by greed. We Christians call that a sin. They think that’s our weakness. But we, alas, know that men who pursue the material world for its sake shall perish along with it, whereas those souls who toil for the spiritual afterworld shall live on for eternity.

Maybe we’re just the pawns on their chessboard. Or maybe we’re just cattle to them. But when you treat people like cattle, you can’t seriously act surprised when those seemingly slow and stupid goyim wake up one day and start treating you like the parasite. You know what’s coming next. It only took one Arminius to defeat your precious Rome, and likewise, it will only take one man to defeat globalism, and we have at least 30 million bright White men worldwide who may qualify for the job.

I find it sad to see White men killing each other in Eastern Ukraine, regardless of which side they’re on. The propaganda has been effective, the brainwashing complete, as though under a magic spell, men’s minds have been shielded from knowing the truth.

But there’s one secret weapon that not even the most powerful ruler can command: that, one day, the dead shall return and get their revenge. The Old Warfather shall rise to lead his armies to victory.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

During this livestream, I held a monologue about the madness of mass immigration. How will our generals defend ourselves against Russia, China, or Iran if they could never protect our people from mass gang rape and mass immigration? We then spoke about the Jewish Messiah in Hollywood movies (Superman was meant to be a Jew), and about escaping the cities with a nod to the Outdoor Boys.

I will be doing the livestreams more frequently (mo-th, 4 nights a week, at 8pm UTC+2 Amsterdam time), but a bit shorter (30-45 minutes instead of 60) to keep the episodes more action-packed.

—

The Speech about Our Situation

Isn't it surprising that our generals brag to the media that they will outsmart the enemy, while those same generals, under their watch, allowed our country to fall prey to mass migration and to the import of a hostile religion for over half a century?

Our own population has already become a minority in all major cities. In the European government city of Brussels, less than 10% of newborn babies are children of two native parents. These children then grow up in a cult that wants to mutilate their genitals. Is that what we should fight for?

Seen from this perspective, you would think that the enemy has already outsmarted us. Millions of enemy soldiers have entered our cities over the past half century under the guise of refugee treaties. Our leaders, wearing their rose-tinted glasses, could only see people in need. They thought that every muscular, well-fed man who reached our borders with a new iPhone in hand and Nike shoes on their feet was a war-torn refugee looking for a better life.

But by crossing our borders, the newcomers didn't magically turn into us. They despise democracy and use it against us, to vote us out. Even when they attack our women and girls in gangs, on an industrial scale, our leaders remain silent, and our judges don't hand out punishments, because they cannot imagine that such needy men had evil intentions.

The perpetrators are actually the real victims, they say, of socio-economic circumstances. Even having low intelligence is suddenly an excuse for acquittal, those poor victims of racism and discrimination! In a normal country, our psychologists would have declared such perpetrators paranoid and schizophrenic. How else can their chaotic behavior be explained?

These foreign perpetrators--in the media they are called "youngsters" or "rioters"--see attacks on their inflated egos everywhere they look. Offer them a glass of water and they will accuse you of racism. These same men run for political office with impunity later in life and tell our children that they should be gay or trans, while they incite their own supporters to have large families.

The young men among them know that they can play boss here, because even if they attack the police with knives and axes, our own citizens are first held at gunpoint in case we might be radicalized. Trying to intervene is pointless, because you'll be taken into custody in handcuffs, and you better keep your mouth shut, otherwise you'll be prosecuted for hate speech.

The newcomers are just waiting for a signal from the outside that they march onto our barracks to defeat us from within, but thanks to a generous diversity program, they won't even have to make an effort: our government and our army have long appointed the enemy to all positions of power in our society.

We were defeated without a single shot being fired. Whose brilliant idea was it to set up this multicultural society, if it wasn't our enemies' generals, who knew very well that they could use our naivety against us? Now we ought to defend the madness in our country by sending our last sons to the Eastern Front? So we'll have to die for our replacement population, for gang rapes, and for the mutilation of children?

If we had still had a country to defend, I would have signed up as a volunteer right away. Except, I'm not going to fight for a foreign country, even if it still bears our old name. On the streets outside, hardly anyone speaks my language anymore, and the alarm sounded from the towers of the local temple remind me five times a day that these areas belong to a foreign god.

We in the West only look at projections of profit, because money is the only thing we have left to care about. That turns out to be our greatest military weakness, for if the enemy manages to attack us with cheap but effective means such as toy drones, then suddenly, we can no longer strike back at them with our expensive missiles costing millions each. Our growth-based economy would then fall apart.

The enemy has a mentality like the East Germans used to have. They used to make light bulbs and washing machines that lasted at least a hundred years. We in the West couldn't make any money off that. In the same manner, the war industry stands or falls depending on growing expenditures, just as a large company will go bankrupt when growth stagnates and stock prices plummet.

It reminds me of a comic book about the space-age. An advanced space people with laser weapons and laser shields attacked a primitive tribe, but the stone points of the primitive people's arrows and spears flew right through the advanced laser shields. We already saw this effect with the Houthi rebels along the Red Sea. Our expensive defenses offered no meaningful protection against their primitive weapons. If this means we now also have to invest in cheaper weapons, our weapons industries will go bankrupt fighting primitives.

I predict that the enemy will defeat us primarily in this financial area, by bleeding us dry economically--something our militaries can do nothing about anyway. At most, they can try driving up the costs. No, our military prefers parading around in the streets wearing rainbow pride colors, as though they were easy targets for enemy drones. This isn't a war, this is a human sacrifice.

If Defense, as I said, is not possible, what do we do? We better prepare for what comes next. In the world that awaits us, we shall continue without globalism. We shall leave the big cities that are no longer conducive to human life. Life will move to areas closer to nature, especially where forests still grow. We will create new communities around small churches that volunteers shall build without money but with effort.

Continuing along the same path as we do now simply won't be possible. Everything comes to an end, but every dwindling end also leads to a vigorous new beginning.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

We all grew up believing that Friedrich Nietzsche was the German philosopher of the far right. Nietzsche’s ideal of the Overman or Übermensch has, for example, been equated with the Nazi ideal of Arno Breker’s sculptures, and with the Hollywood Superman. But Nietzsche, who died in 1900, a year after Hitler was born, had very peculiar visions of such higher men.

Nietzsche’s attacks on Christianity, declaring God dead, and calling for the abolition of Catholic morality, and for the overturning of all Western values, however, have each laid the foundation for the modern-day trans-liberal LGBT circus cult. Nietzsche’s ideas have shaped the modern Left far more than the modern Right.

To find clues about professor Nietzsche’s true intentions, we must look no further than to his interactions with some of his male students, such as when he suggested to a pupil, after a lecture he gave in Basel, to go to Italy together. The young man, embarrassed in front of his class, stammered that he couldn’t go, and Nietzsche never spoke to the pupil again.

It gets much more explicit. Traveling Italy by himself at age 38, Nietzsche mentioned in his diary a “menacing … attack of desire … when the lonely man embraces the first man to come his way and treat him as a precious gift from heaven.” To his friend Paul Ree, he wrote, “I had a kind of unrequited love for you.” And to childhood friend Erwin Rohde, Nietzsche wrote:

“It fills me with profound dissatisfaction that we cannot live together. We are virtuosi on an instrument that other men cannot and will not listen to but which is for us the source of the greatest enchantment.”

What instrument? Of course, he meant his phallus because Friedrich Nietzsche was a ft. His entire philosophy served merely to justify his desires. Here, then, Nietzsche caused confusion by writing frequently in a style that later appealed to right-wing nationalists. Wherever Nietzsche wrote in his books of free spirits, Übermenschen, or higher men, in actuality, he meant gays and crossdressers.

Nietzsche thought that the Overman, like himself, should transcend simple people’s heteronormativity. Like many afflicted by his condition, it is likely that Nietzsche felt intensely superior about his degenerate nature, for it presupposes an extreme narcissism.

Indeed, homosexuality is usually a byproduct of having a narcissistic personality disorder. Such people tend to look for mates whose faces are most similar to their own, whereas straight people tend to look for mates who look a bit different from themselves. This why heterosexual couples complement each other, whereas in homosexual relationships, they duplicate each other.

And then it gets even worse. Near the end of his book Zarathustra, there was supposed to be a chapter called the “Ass-Festival”, referring to the animal, i.e., a donkey. Swiss psychoanalyst Carl Jung, in his extensive analysis of Nietzsche and his work Zarathustra, remarks on page 1492 of this tome:

“… and when he became insane, Nietzsche produced the most shocking erotic literature. It was destroyed by his careful sister, but professor Overbeck had a glimpse of it, and there is plenty of evidence of [Nietzsche’s] pathological condition.”

According to Jung, the ass represents a symbol of voluptuousness, and this theme returns in other poems by Nietzsche’s hand. It isn’t too far-fetched to figure out why Nietzsche’s sister deleted this story about Übermenschen having an orgy with donkeys. Nietzsche, by his twisted logic, believed Europeans needed such new festivals in order to become superior.

I conclude that Friedrich Nietzsche was a perverted and mentally ill man whose writings belong in the realm of the far-left. He was a morally depraved communist, not at all supportive of nationalist health.

Though he may have felt smugly superior about his condition, it disqualifies his works. Nietzsche conceived his Übermensch not as a blue-eyed hetero-Superman, but rather as a brown, transhuman, transgender demon, namely transcending the boundaries of gender, nationality, and race—the exact opposite of what our movement stands for.

His sister and others began attaching Nietzsche, posthumously, to the far right, because they intended to corrupt the healthy Christian morality and pervert it into what the lesser clowns now practice at their pride parades. The modern pride parades are Nietzsche’s ass festivals.

What bothers me is not the content of Nietzsche’s sickness, but rather the insidious deception by which liberal degenerates have tried to infect the Right with it. We need to set the matter straight, so to speak, and dismiss this freak of nature Nietzsche.

After all, our people’s strength is inborn. We don’t need to become supermen to better ourselves. We just need to do away with the communist anti-culture in order to stay strong.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Today’s episode is about right-wing women who are outspokenly against diversity, mass immigration, and immigrant rape. I mentioned the Women’s Safety Initiative (Britain), Lukreta (Germany), and Collectif Némésis (France). These organizations, and others, joined in Germany recently, bringing together over 100 European women to talk about the lack of safety around immigrant men, the rape statistics, even calling out the Pakistani and Bangladeshi rape squads operating in our countries. I recommend men of Europe should support these women’s movements.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

During this live stream (aired on TikTok), I spoke at length about building a reactionary movement. I said that culture is downstream from race, but that race, as a material construct, is downstream from the spiritual world. Meaning, our beliefs about ourselves and our ancestors shape our decisions, including our mating choices. To truly overthrow globohomo-feminism, we’ll have to go after the roots of feminist witchcraft, and replace the occult foundations of our society with a masculine alternative.

Link to the article I was discussing »

You can also follow me on Telegram, Twitter/X, or Rumble.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

I experimented with dual-live-streaming on both TikTok and YouTube. And I spoke about various topics relating to the Israel-Iran conflict. The painting in the background is by George Bellows.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

“We have so much land. We want to put it to use. We’re going to have land release, and on that land we’re going to build housing.”—Donald J. Trump

President Trump announced today that he wants to build more housing on unused land in the USA. This echoes policies from Great Britain and The Netherlands, whose governments are also lobbying—hard—to build millions more houses. The caveat is that government spokespeople have already admitted that most of the new housing will be meant to house migrants.

To date, however, it wasn’t clear which migrants Western nations plan on bringing in. For a while, I thought it was going to be the Palestinians. But after millions of Africans and Middle Easterners already flooded West-European lands, the impending war between Iran and Israel gives the conclusive answer: it’s going to be Israeli Jews.

During Iran’s war with Israel, even if Israel ultimately wins the war, we may expect to see the Chosen People flee by the millions. To where? To Europe, and to the USA. Israel houses some 7.2 million Jewish Israelis, and we may assume many, most, if not all of them shall seek refuge elsewhere once the annihilation war gets up to speed.

And who is going to pay for their resettlement? The Zionist-occupied governments of the West, of course, are going to tax their White middle classes for this new episode of the “refugee housing scam”.

This puts the stint with the South African refugees coming to the USA in a wholly different light. Was the arrival of handfuls of White Afrikaners just a ploy to prepare the American people for the arrival of millions more White-looking but Jewish immigrants?

It comes at a time when the American White middle class, also known as the warrior class, has hit all-time lows in terms of support for foreign wars. Trump, after all, ran for office on a ticket to end support for foreign wars. And I don’t believe Trump’s former election general Steven Bannon saying that the MAGA movement will follow the Jewocratic lead.

The Jewish lobby may be strong, but it is not all-powerful. The lobby may push for the policy, but it cannot win over the American hearts and minds. If I were Jewish, I would worry about whether the migration of millions of Jews from Israel to the USA might unite the American left and the American right under the umbrella of anti-Semitism.

People have had enough. For a long time, Ancient Rome needed Judea as a bulwark against the Parthian Empire, i.e., what is now Iran. Then in the year 135 AD, after a revolt and betrayal by the Judeans, the Roman Empire cut its ties and renamed Judea "Syria Palaestina".

Today’s situation eerily resembles that past. A betrayal of America by the Israelis will lead to the same outcome—the West cutting itself loose from, and abandoning Israel, and with it, the Jewish people.

At any rate, Western nations deserve new leaders. We should dismantle the Jewish influence over Western governments. It’s time White men and women started putting themselves first over others.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Israel has struck at the heart of Iran, attacking not only several nuclear facilities, but also key people in the Iranian hierarchy were killed, sabotaging future operations.

The use of drones launched from within enemy territory begs whether the so-called authoritarian axis of Russia, Iran, and China may also be capable of doing similar damage to the West? China has bought up a surprising lot of farmland in the USA in proximity to crucial U.S. military installations, for example.

One may argue that China doesn’t have the requisite satellite network in orbit in order to remote-control their drones, however, I believe China has secretly developed military-grade peer-to-peer mobile networks, so that their drones can be directed without the need for satellites.

Either way, the possibility of attacks on Western soil is not to be discounted. But why, exactly, are countries like India, and several Arab States such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Egypt, now siding with Israel?

One might argue that Indian Hindus have long been the victims of Iranian Muslim aggression, or that Iran’s Shia brand of Islam sets it apart from the Sunni brand of Arab and Turkic Islam. Though these ethno-religious fault lines certainly mark the battlefield, the currency with which the West has bought the allegiance of India and of the Arab States is, of course, immigration.

Haven’t we noticed the recent mass influx of Indians into Australia, Canada, France, the USA, and many other places in the West? All of a sudden, Australia, a country the size of Europe but housing barely 27 million people, has close to 1 million foreign students. What for? Well, this type of migration-for-education scheme was used as payment for India’s allegiance to the West. And in the USA, it’s the H1-B visas meant to undercut American citizens.

Immigration, welfare, and housing are really the only things the West can offer third parties for their loyalty. Haven’t concerns over the British grooming gang been heavily suppressed in order not to alienate Pakistan, an ally of China? By allowing cousin marriage and child brides, as recently debated in the British Parliament, perhaps South Asians will see the West more favorably?

Indeed, we are throwing out our morals and our values, our whole culture, as pearls before swine, to appease to sickness and savagery, in hopes of binding barbaric allies to our cause.

Countries such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, or Jordan obstinately refuse to accept any Palestinian refugees. Why? Because the people driven from their lands will arrive, via Libya, into The Netherlands and Great Britain. The equally obligatory supporters of Israel, Germany and Sweden, already absorbed millions of Syrians over a decade ago.

Europeans are paying for the Arabs’ loyalty to Israel and the US by absorbing their co-religionists, by making Paris, London, Brussels, and Amsterdam new Islamic capitals, and into destitute places.

There is no doubt that Western leaders are twisted opportunists, willing to sell out, ready to expunge their native populations in hopes of retaining their precious corporate profits.

Meanwhile, the share of White babies in many U.S. states has dropped below 20%, and below 40% nationally. Sending White sons to war amounts to genocide. I suggest, therefore, that White American soldiers defect during this Third World War, and seek refuge in Europe, posing as Arabs, in order to collect their free housing and welfare checks.

The USA, or rather the Anglo-American world, now awakens to a three-front war, namely a war simultaneously fought against Russia, China, and Iran. This is a war that cannot be won, but the twisted men of the West will at least try hard to make good profits.

The gods have retreated from our world. Left behind are soulless drones, unthinking AI, and a dispirited people. There is no more honor to be found in battlefield death. It is a waste.

Ordinary people must realize that salvation comes from neither profits nor progress, but from a conversion. Tired of the decline, we begin the ascent.

We shall recreate our world by quelling the pains of war, and stoking the fires of a New God—Our Savior.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this live-streamed talk, I introduced my concept of “confrontationalism”, a new kind of political strategy, and then went on to interact with the audience.

Below you also find my “primer” on confrontationalism:

—

I’m not a fan of big words, but White men need to adopt confrontationalism as a political path forward. We need to organize our able-bodied fighting men into factions willing to confront our archenemy, the Institutional Leftist. Those with a conflict-loving nature shall be recruited to form the Phalanx, a group ready to break through enemies lines.

People who seek confrontation with the status quo are the only ones who’ll ever change anything. They address the difficult topics no one else is talking about openly. They are willing to act. But they are also at greatest risk of being jailed or getting killed for their actions. Only those with the least fear of death shall populate our frontline in the war against Global Leftism.

It is of little use trying to “wake up the normies” who, by definition, remain dull and inanimate. Rather, we shall follow the metaphor of “joining the other lions”.

It was said by Hagen in Siegfried’s Saga from the Edda that “if we would have more children, there wouldn’t be a mightier race on Earth: we would even withstand the gods.”

Confrontational-ism

When we speak of confrontation, we mean to confront a provably corrupt, flawed, or bad organizing system, usually the ones represented by governments and corporations. To confront them means to bring about this evidence of malpractice, and to force the actor (a state, an elite, etc.) to change their ways, “or else”.

The “or else” part implies the destruction of said actor for its unwillingness to better itself, so that it may be replaced with a superior, saner, and more truthful system. We act, therefore, not out of a pathological need to seek conflict, such as a thrill seeker would, but out of a desire to rectify persistent societal evils that, for too long, have gone uncontested.

We do all this because we no longer believe in the so-called democratic process that has historically failed us. What good is a democracy, for example, that allows corporations to create harmful medication, which are then, via a fraudulent democratic process, imposed onto a largely unwitting people?

When the democracy itself—as has often been proven—is prone to deception by outsiders, then what is the value of such a democracy if not to serve as an attack vector to harm our peoples? Confrontationalism solves this problem by attacking the wrong-doers head-on, rather than waiting for some miracle election to sway bureaucrats the right way.

If democracy doesn’t work, we need to confront it.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Elon Musk and Donald Trump threw a hissy fit at the White House after breaking up their techno-Republican alliance. Musk accused Trump of being on the Epstein list, which has been public news since 2016. And Trump, by the mouth of his shadow general Steve Bannon, suggested Musk is an illegal immigrant who should be deported. Bannon also said that the SpaceX company should be seized, after Musk threatened to decommission the Dragon spacecraft needed to take astronauts to and from the International Space Station.

But what is behind all this children’s play? Don’t the richest and the most powerful man on Earth know how to make deals behind closed doors? Or are we truly being ruled by toddlers?

Whether or not this show was a distraction, Musk, in the end, is a green energy leftist. Always has been. Since people aren’t adopting Electric Vehicles (EVs) quickly enough—due to known practical limitations such as short range, long charging times, and rising electricity prices—Musk needed Trump to pass an EV Mandate. A mandate, by law, is a way to force Americans to switch to driving electric, by banning the sale of gasoline cars; it is a similar ploy as what the European Union plans to do by the year 2030.

But Trump, of course, represents much more of the D.C. swamp he promised to drain than he’ll lead his MAGA base on to believe. Remember, under Biden, there was an electric vehicle summit, and Elon Musk wasn’t invited? Now, under Trump, Musk is ousted. And that’s because Musk is, indeed, a foreigner to the U.S. establishment. Musk wasn’t born of any of the about 20,000 richest families that rule the USA together, according to research published in G. William Domhoff’s Who Rules America?

This American aristocracy isn’t going to let a South African outsider take their most lucrative business away from them. Indeed, Donald Trump’s friends in oil and gas don’t want to lose their minimum 30 billion dollars in subsidies to keep people driving fossil fuels, nor do they want to lose the fossil engine market through an EV Mandate. No wonder that Trump, sitting next to a quiet and silly-looking Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany, blatantly admitted that it was his idea, during his first presidential term, to blow up the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, namely to force Germans to buy American oil and gas.

Now, why would Trump want Germans to buy oil and gas if we were going to switch to green energy? Ha-ha!

The interests of the USA are as selfish as those of the flamboyant President. To Europeans, this means an increasing energy dependence on the USA, and on US allies abroad as well: notably Israel, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. Israel is competing with Turkey to become an energy transfer hub for Europe. And didn’t the Arabs claim, a while a go, that people outside the West will continue driving fossil fuel cars for hundreds of years to come? Musk will disagree, but I agree that green energy is largely a scam subsidized by Western middle classes. Climate policy is another word for wealth redistribution.

What we are witnessing here, then, is a successful palace coup committed by the traditional oil and gas industry. They’ve won the war against solar and wind without even announcing it. The rising cost of wind parks at sea, and the greater-than-profitable cost of solar panels, means green energy will never be more than a mere addition to the global energy mix.

Despite Spain’s experiment, recently, in achieving 100% renewables on the grid, the situation for Europe is going to be as follows: Our American “ally” (quote-unquote) has deliberately sabotaged our access to cheaper Russian fuels, oil and gas, so that we must now purchase them from the USA and its allies at minimum 8 times the cost, i.e., at war-racketeering prices. Moreover, the switch from Russian gas to Qatari and American (shale) gas, and from Russian oil to American and Arab oil, makes us dependent on Arab notions of Islam, rather than on Russian notions of White Orthodox Christianity.

Still, any kind of dependence is undesirable. And unless the EU army becomes strong and equipped enough to beat those of the USA, Russia, and China combined, it is likely that Europeans shall be trapped in a state of servitude to foreign interests, including a submission to Islam, and a continued acceptance of mass immigration.

However, I don’t deal in this kind of pessimism. If Europe won’t act in its self-interest, the rest of the world will. It is my advice that Europeans, therefore, should first replace their weak and ineffective leaders with strongmen willing to fight, hard, for the survival of their people. Secondly, Europeans will need to sort out their energy problems, and I doubt that Elon Musk’s green energy is going to save us. It’s time for Europe, then, to go nuclear, and with nuclear, I mean fusion.

Europe needs nuclear fusion in order to save itself from foreign domination, whether by the USA, by Russia, by China, by the Ottoman Turks, or by the Islamic world. Our best and brightest engineers should make nuclear fusion energy a reality within the next five to ten years. For if they fail, Europe and its peoples will simply cease to exist.

Europe needs energy independence, not another corporate scam.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

A live stream episode I hosted on TikTok. I discussed the competency crisis and relating matters. Can White people finally stop being loyal to these dying economies we used to call “home”? Also includes some talk of IQ differences between immigrants and native Europeans.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

German chancellor Friedrich Merz has made a catastrophic mis-assessment of the war situation in Ukraine. He stated, on live television, that German rockets may now be used to strike targets anywhere in Russia.

But since Putin loves a game of tit-for-tat, Merz's provocative words carry the risk of escalation, endangering 700 million Europeans.

Those German rockets, for example, cannot be operated by the uneducated personnel in Ukraine, and are already being directed by specialists from Germany. So, the Russians will logically strike at European targets in exchange for being hit by European weapons.

NATO's article 5 isn't going to protect us, either, when Trump's USA doesn't care, and last February, one German vice-chancellor compared Trump to Darth Vader. So don't expect any help from the American Empire.

German politicians can say whatever they want without consequences. Meanwhile, the German police have no time preventing one after the other mass knife killing, terrorist car attack, or mass gang rapes in the park, because they are too busy arresting ordinary citizens who dare ask critical questions online.

One judge gave a massive fine to a man who asked on X why it is permissible to say "Germany be damned" but not "Everything for Germany", the latter being an apparent slogan from the Nazi era, when Chancellor Merz's grandfather joined the SA [Sturm Abteilung].

All of this points to a total loss of control. Chancellor Merz isn't really in control of his own words anyway, of course. He is a puppet being played by a team of ventriloquists: the European Commission, the Élysée, Downing Street, the White House, and the Knesset, each taking turn deciding Germany's official policy.

If Germans want to regain control of the situation, and be the directors of European destiny, they should first make themselves an equal partner of the aforementioned five, namely by cutting the strings attached to the Pinocchio.

Make a stand for your economic and cultural interests, rather than declaring yourself the battlefield upon which the Third World War will be fought and lost, for a strong Russia means it will either conquer Europe, or else the Americans will destroy Europe before Russia can take it.

Only a strong Germany can prevent this fate, perhaps now with an alliance with Poland, unless the Poles turn against Germany, too.

At this point, do you really think European parliamentarians should be wasting time organizing gay pride parades in Eastern Europe? Is it really your goal to turn Eastern Europeans against the EU by attacking their children? Are you all completely stupid?

It doesn't need to be this way. The loss of control can be turned around into a vision of clarity, namely that Germany will become as strong as the Holy Roman Empire again, to act as a bulwark between Russia and the Colonial Powers, and ultimately as their referee.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Putin recently threatened to choke the West, by which he meant our economies. Though we should wonder how exactly the Russian leader is going to achieve this, it is clear he is seeking revenge for the Western sanctions that harmed Russia. He calls it a mirror attack.

Indeed, ever since the start of the war, Putin has been playing this game of tit-for-tat, always handing back to the West what he believes the West handed him.

This is a really important point because Putin's style of warfare is scientifically underpinned by game theory, which says that tit-for-tat is the only winning strategy. The Western powers led by NATO appear to understand nothing about game theory, and don't even recognize it in action. The Western strategy is emotional and irrational by comparison.

After 80 years of relative peace and prosperity in the West, we have started feeling terribly superior about our condition. We believe, falsely, that we are both morally and technologically superior. In reality, we are just gay and effeminate. The enemy is straight and patriarchal. The feminist EU leadership's hatred for Putin and for Trump is pure hysteria, not rooted in reason.

And so, the West, despite repeatedly proclaiming victory, is frequently confronted with the reality on the battlefield that Russia isn't losing. The West thought it could do a hysterical witches dance and so manifest the desired outcome. It turns out the patriarchal Russian laser focus on our weaknesses is no match for the comedy act in charge of Ukraine.

Our media often claim that Russia's GDP is about the same as that of Spain. And so, the money-women of the West thought defeating Russia was going to be easy. They said Russia is just a gas station. But Russia happens to control vast resources to fuel its war efforts for at least another hundred years, whereas Spain is largely a barren land that could not defend itself against Russia for more than 24 hours.

Can you guess, for example, which country is jailing 1,000 people per month for social media postings? It's the UK, not Russia. Which countries are switching back to nuclear and fossil fuels after failing to make renewables work? EU countries, not Russia. Which country has seniors fishing bottles and cans out of the trash to supplement a starvation pension? Germany, not Russia. Which country is telling young women that they should emigrate, to work in Australian mines? It's Ireland, not Russia.

And yet, I don't want Russia to conquer Europe. I want Europe to quit acting weak. To remove this rot from our societies, we have to confront feminism. The women and their pet males in charge of the EU are never going to defeat our enemies.

European men have been feminized to the point of their extinction. For example, under the influence of occult brotherhoods such as Freemasonry or Rosicrucianism, which have infected our elites with female ideals of openness, philanthropy, and cooperation. This institutional femininity has undermined our race's drive to win in unfair competitions, except dressed as women competing against girls

The Russian soldiers aren't girls. They are men wearing uniforms. If we don't make this war about the defeat of feminism, I don't see how Europe will continue to exist. What we need in Europe, is a systemic cleansing of effeminacy, and to rebuild the patriarchy.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

The dream of renewable energy has popped. After Spain’s electric grid blacked out—within a week after achieving 100% renewable use—people were quick to blame Spain’s socialist government for its mismanagement. So then why are European nations, one month later, hurrying to switch back to nuclear?

Denmark has repealed its 1985 ban on nuclear energy, Belgium is reverting its nuclear phaseout, and Sweden has passed a law to invest in nuclear developments. Germany and France, the two powers that rule the European Union together, have decided to remove legal limitations on the use of nuclear within the EU.

Although Germany shut down its last three nuclear power plants in 2023, under pressure from the Green Lobby, just two years later, German leaders say up to six plants could be restarted. This wishy-washy style of energy management is affecting the 450 million EU citizens whose lives depend on electricity.

We all know why Europe is turning back to nuclear energy, and it’s because of Putin. And because the Anglo-American Empire sabotaged the Nord Stream pipelines, cutting off Europe’s most important industry—located in Western Germany—from cheap Russian gas.

The so-called sanctions on Russia have further crippled German industry, leading to an unprecedented wave of bankruptcies.

So why didn’t renewables work? Up until now, most investments in solar and wind have been heavily subsidized by governments in order to promote adoption. However, a 2022 report by Dutch research authority TNO predicted that, by 2030, unsubsidized wind farms might not become profitable.

Today, we can attest that, without government subsidies, the wind parks are indeed unprofitable. The cost of materials needed to build wind and solar farms has skyrocketed due to increased global demand.

For this reason, Dutch energy companies are refusing government contracts to build more wind turbines at sea. Germany’s first offshore wind farm is being dismantled as we speak after having been in use for just 15 years—at a net loss to society, of course.

Europeans weren’t generating free and green electricity from wind and solar. They were paying to subsidize green companies. But without free money, the green operators now refuse to deliver.

If wind and solar aren’t profitable in and of themselves, it makes sense to switch back to fossil and nuclear. But, since the cost of extraction of quality fossil fuels has also steadily increased, Europeans have no choice but to try nuclear.

A nuclear power plant is basically a giant water boiler heated by decaying uranium. The steam from the boiler is what generates electricity. I.e., it’s a steam engine. But uranium, too, isn’t cheap, and although Australia appears to have the largest stores of uranium buried in its soil, Russia and Canada also possess large amounts.

When, last year, I said that Germany should talk to its former colony of Namibia to discuss the sale of its uranium stores, everyone called me a racist. The colonizers have returned to take Africa’s resources. But here we are. I predict that Germany is going to welcome half a million Namibians into its borders soon, as part of a uranium deal, of course.

In the end, Europe has long become dependent on foreign sources of energy. The real problem, then, remains unsolved, namely that the European continent is vastly overpopulated, and that a time of reckoning will still come.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Modernity needs to die, and here’s why.

The material elevation of the working classes since the Industrial Age has granted ordinary people the luxuries of kings and empresses—at least, so they said. But do a hot shower, a TV set, and refrigerated foods really weigh up to the loss of a heroic life?

After all, the aristocracy of the past had many more abundances than merely advanced sanitation or modern heating. They also had free time, lots of it, to explore their world and develop their interests and talents accordingly. They didn’t have to work 40 hours a week to provide for basic living conditions, such as rent, and neither did Medieval European peasants, who only worked 20.

Modern man, however, cannot escape the rat race of organized society. His identity has been foreclosed. Children born into the modern world no longer get to explore it, except in video games. One is mangled through the mental torture called education, where the truth is predetermined by the State, namely in the service of that State. One’s personality is erased, and one is rendered into an “equal”, i.e., the perfect taxpayer who shall do no harm.

We aren’t free citizens anymore! We are slaves, domesticated humans!

Our ideals of freedom and self-determination have been replaced by material greed. No longer do we strive to live the heroic life. We no longer hunt as kings used to. We no longer feel the rush of brushes with death. The modern world is numb, our minds no longer creative.

Ever since Karl Marx, an autistic ideology has been at work transforming free citizens into worker drones. The Western world has become a machine with a self-perpetuating purpose, namely to produce material wealth at scale, and to invite people in. Bereft of his humanity, the common man now lives through his economic value. Without money, he is nothing, for he has no God.

But, as the older White generations of the West have steadily lost the appetite to work for stuff they don’t need, to impress people they don’t care about, hordes of poor people from other parts of the world can still be fooled by the lure of shiny toys. And so, we, the elders trapped the longest in this senseless scheme, are condemned to maintain a machine that offers us no meaning in life.

Had it not been for mass immigration bringing in hordes of new consumers, Europe and the American-led West would have already been exiting the Economic Age. We would have been returning ourselves to the Heroic Age, or rather, reviving ourselves, and reinvigorating ourselves with freedom. Unbound by the rules and regulations of a collapsing order, ordinary men and women would be fleeing the big cities, and seizing plots of land to establish their families.

What we need is a new mythology.

Instead, here we are, waiting for the end to come, an end being eternally postponed with the arrival of ever more and ever lower rate import-citizens, for only the most destitute and least competent of Earth still bother to embrace the Western way.

Friends—let’s put an end to all of this. Let’s break free from the chains holding us down. Our spirit cannot be conquered or divided, our God cannot be distributed to the weak. Rather than being the world’s asylum center for people with cognitive disabilities, Europe needs to become a place that is physically so inhospitable that only the strongest souls can thrive.

I’ll see you all in Hell!

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

The study of geopolitics is fun because it explains everything happening to us. That's how you find out that the Germans during the time of Otto von Bismarck were trying to unify all Muslims of the Middle East under the rule of the Turkish Ottoman Empire.

Von Bismarck wanted to use these bioweapons to attack colonial British interests in Egypt, Sudan, and Syria, by causing a revolt against the colonial rule. Germany could then seize control of the important trade routes of the Suez Canal and the Persian Gulf.

Indeed, the surrounding territories such as Palestine, Iraq, Iran, and Syria were once allies of Germany during the world wars, even Turkey was an ally during World War I.

Nowadays, of course, the roles have reversed, and the colonial powers now led by the USA are using the same bioweapons to attack continental Europe via mass immigration, to sabotage us with rape, and to reduce our average intelligence.

When Trump says he wants to deport a million Palestinians from their region to Libya, the migrant smugglers of Tripoli will be paid handsomely to take them to Italy, and then, of course, to Germany and other North West European countries.

So it seems nothing has changed. The Americans who once liberated us from the mustache man later became our colonizers, and are now, once again, Europe's enemy.

The Americans always obsess with fighting Russia, such as today in Ukraine and also during the Cold War, because a German-Russian combined empire would mean the end of American power. But American strategists also deeply fear the opposite: a German conquest of Russia. That's why the Yankees of 1944 fought against Germany instead of with the Germans against the communists.

Although the EU is now communist in practice, the new German chancellor Friedrich Merz offers us a plot twist. He vows to make the German army the strongest in Europe!

During the Second World War, Germany was barely 1.5 times richer than Soviet Russia. Today, Germany is nearly 7 times richer than Putin's Russia. However, with a dwindling economy, and 0% growth, Germany may indeed try to conquer Russia again. Not officially for Lebensraum, of course, but to "bring democracy".

With the EU's help, by switching from Russian gas to gas from Qatar, the Muslim world might, for reasons of profit, even support the new German war machine.

If Trump makes the mistake of bringing American troops home from occupied Germany, Germany is free to acquire nuclear weapons. And if climate change is really melting the ice, and the Northern Sea Route would open up sea trade from Hamburg to Beijing, then the Middle Eastern trade passages become irrelevant.

That's why Trump is making friends with Putin. Because if the Germans are really going to fight Russia, Wall Street bankers will invest in Russian defenses, just like they did last time.

The colonial powers will fund both sides, because they don't want either side to win. They call it baiting and bleeding.

It's amazing that we've gone full circle and arrived back at the same point. It's called destiny. Except, this time, we are armed with history's lessons.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Will Turkey stay loyal to NATO and help defend Europe against Russia? Or is Turkey the proverbial Trojan Horse, first collecting its payments from its economic integration with Europe, while pretending to support NATO, but later only to fund its energy infrastructure, its military industry, and ultimately, its betrayal by siding with Russia?

Let’s explore the possibility that Turkey is taking the Mickey out of Europe.

If the Turkish leadership wanted to rebuild the Islamic Ottoman Empire, that’s what they should do: play the fool, take Europe’s money, invest in a military buildup, and then betray the Europeans by siding with Russia.

There are many indications that Europeans are simply too naive about their Islamic military partner, for in the past decades, the EU has consistently rewarded Turkish aggression with more money.

When Turkish president Erdoğan threatened to unleash millions of Syrian refugees into Europe, Chancellor Merkel of Germany promptly wired billions of Euros to keep the Turkish borders closed. Indeed, what Germany doesn’t want to be seen doing—close the borders—it often pays its partners to do further upstream the migration routes.

Now, for over a decade-and-a-half, there’s been a proposal to build a pipeline for natural gas deliveries from Qatar to Turkey, but through Syria. Syrian president Assad rejected it, and the Syrian civil war conveniently delayed the project.

Assad is now gone. Combined with Europe’s unintelligible sanctions of the Russian economy, and keeping in mind the allied sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline that once connected German industry to Russian gas, Turkey may prove to be Europe’s savior in need.

Today, Turkey already provides Eastern Europe with gas from Russia through its Turk Stream pipeline, preventing nations such as Hungary from freezing in winter. With the new pipeline, Turkey could easily disrupt European energy needs. Based on Turkey’s past behavior, it could blackmail the West into accepting Turkey’s bid for EU membership.

By giving Turkey this much bargaining power over European winter heating, another risk arises. Namely, once the Turkish Trojan Horse has accumulated enough wealth, at the right time, it may deliberately cut off energy supplies to Europe, and laughingly side with Russia in a joint invasion of Europe.

Europeans, freezing, will not be able to defend themselves. This has massive civilizational implications. When, for example, was it decided that Europe should swap out its energy dependence on a White and Christian civilization, namely Orthodox Russia, for a dependency on fundamentalist and Islamic alternatives?

For whatever reason, the EU leadership has decided Europe must be Islamized, for I hope it is clear that Turkey’s rising status as energy transit hub for European economies comes with a price tag called Islam. What Turkey could not do at the Battle of Vienna, it may finally achieve with natural gas: submit Christian Europe to its will.

This whole ordeal, of course, exposes the bankruptcy of modern geopolitical thinking. Everything has been reduced to economic opportunism. Morality and belief no longer matter. Only material wealth matters. When, in the past, European men, impoverished to the bone, fought to the bitter end to defend their women’s honor, today, godless European leaders welcome the rape of their continent. For the money.

This is what American president Ronald Reagan once meant with his speech titled, A Time for Choosing. He ended that speech with the following words:

“You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We'll preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.”

A thousand years of darkness. The Trojan Horse is made of wood. Perhaps it can offer us a light.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

I spoke about different topics during this livestream: about the subversion of White history, about the vilification of White men in particular, slander, and about mastery of the physical world through technology. I criticized Elon Musk and the Trump Admin for focusing on commercial success rather than cultural and technological dominance. What we need is a return to this understanding that the men who master the physical world by inventing the next generation of advanced technology will rule the world and everyone in it. We need to go back to subjugating Mother Nature, and do away with the feminine hysteria and irrational emotionality of the LGBTQ/Leftist movements.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Mass immigration to the West is revenge for the abolition of slavery in the East. Slavery was once a main source of income for the Middle Eastern / Semitic world. When Europeans began replacing human labor with machines and factories that could do the work of ten, if not thousands, of men, we bankrupted the slave markets.

A Holocaust in Congo?

Modern historians refer to the alleged mass murder of the people of Congo around the year 1900 by the Belgian colonizers as a Black Holocaust. Popularized by a fiction novel called King Leopold’s Ghost—made mandatory reading for college students—the myth goes that Europeans killed up to 13 million blacks in the Congo Holocaust in order to steal their wealth.

Many an African in my TikTok comments sections seems to believe the story really happened, except it didn’t. Not at all. Over a period of 20 years, in an area the size of one-third of the USA today, about 10,000 locals died in skirmishes with the Belgian police forces.

The population of Congo did decrease by millions during that period, due to venereal disease, and due to the abolition of slavery, after which the freed slaves, mostly women from other parts of Africa, fled the country. These women had been destined to be mass raped in order to produce children for the African warlords, to be sold as slaves to the Arabs.

When the slaves left, Congo’s birth rates declined so sharply that the population size soon dwindled by millions.

Notably, it had been the Europeans who ended the slavery in Congo. East African Semitics and Arabs had introduced it centuries before. Congo was their birthing basket, where they produced more slaves to be employed as servants in Arab households.

The Europeans didn’t “do a holocaust” in Congo. It never happened. If anything, the European put an end to a brutal local practice of human sacrifice, such as when one Congolese warlord ordered hundreds of half-naked women to run through barricades, maiming their limbs, only to have their lives sacrificed to Satan in a thirsty blood cult.

Moreover, mind the strange wording of “stealing African wealth”. Wealth is created by mixing natural resources with one’s labor. But Black Africa around 1900 didn’t have any meaningful wealth, except for the slaves they put up for sale.

Africa had resources, but the factories were in Europe. Europe had gone through the Industrial Age, Black Africa had not. European hands were able to turn the worthless bauxite into aluminum used for ships and airplanes, i.e., into wealth. Blacks in Africa had not even gone looking for the alleged resources, for they had no use for cobalt or iron ore.

It is no different today. Africa still isn’t producing any meaningful quantities of wealth. Chinese, European, and American companies are mining the lithium for car batteries in places such as Nigeria, but the batteries aren’t being produced in Africa.

Had Africans been violent industrialists instead of brutal head-hunters, then Africans would have discovered Europe. Except, they didn’t.

A Holocaust in Latin America?

Likewise, our subversive historians refer to the mass murder of the people of the Americas. They call it another Holocaust. Except, that, too, never happened. When European explorers first set foot in Latin America, they found a thriving rural economy. When they returned, one hundred years later, they found nothing but abandoned ghost towns.

Since Europeans hadn’t slaughtered the natives, historians prefer blaming our germs. We, those primitive and unclean creatures hailing from the North, must have spread our diseases.

This, too, didn’t happen. When Europeans first stumbled upon Latin America, they found a civilization already nearing the end-stage of its historical course. In fact, that’s why Europeans were ultimately able to take over, namely, because the local societies had grown too weak to defend themselves any longer.

What happened in Latin America was the internal collapse of a civilization. The Incas and Mayas largely died out because of their brutal death cults usurping rivers of blood, paired with a failure to sustain their large-scale agriculture.

Is It a Revenge Fantasy?

Now, why would modern Western scholars and some foreign historians, during just the past 30 years, pour so much effort into rewriting European history to make it look as though Europeans were “always doing holocausts”? As though Auschwitz were the logical and certain outcome of the European course of history?

The answer is that our arch enemies wished they had colonized the world first, but the European beat them to it.

Arabs and Semites had, of course, already colonized North Africa and East Africa many centuries before Europeans arrived there. But since North and East African also didn’t have any meaningful production industry and also hadn’t gone through any Industrial Revolution, those societies relied on the force of unpaid human labor, or what they called “human ebony”, i.e., black slaves harvested from the African interior, such as from Congo.

The White crusaders chased after the Arab slavers and ransacked the slave markets, putting an end to this practice, and thereby erasing the main source of income flowing to the Middle Eastern world, which was human slave trade.

Had the Semites also colonized West Africa and the Americas, they, not Europeans, would have ruled the world, but it would have been a world fueled by slave labor.

Now, I assume, you understand why the new slave traders switched to mass immigration, using immigrants as the justification to rob Western taxpayers’ coffers, forcing Westerners to pay for housing and services to the migrant classes.

Get it? It’s our archenemies’ long-planned and long-awaited revenge for the loss of their slave profits.

So this is what all this talk of White Supremacy is really about. The invention of “whiteness” is meant to paint a dark, macabre picture of White men in general, in order to disown them from the wealth they generated themselves, in the factories they built themselves, with the resources they dug out from the soil themselves.

The idea of “White guilt” is meant to help dethrone European men as history’s victors. Not because our detractors care so much about the equality of their new migrant slaves—they don’t—but because our archenemies wish to crown themselves kings of a new global slave empire.

And so, they have allied themselves with “women and minorities” against the champions of civilization—by lying about the Native American Holocaust, which was an agricultural collapse, and by lying about the Congo Holocaust, which never even happened at all.

Europe Stands Tall

European history didn’t lead straight to the Holocaust. Communism, however, did logically and straightforwardly lead to the Holocaust of Slavic Christians under the Soviet regime when Genrikh Yagoda murdered almost 20 million in the Gulag extermination camps, alongside another 100 million for the crime of being White.

Communism led to the displacement of ethnic Germans from Czechoslovakia, Western Poland and many other places. The same communists now want to repeat their blood lusted crimes against all the Europeans in Europe and against their descendants worldwide.

We are dealing with a Satanic cult that thrives on mass human sacrifice. If we don’t stop the communist, they will exterminate all of humanity. Their hunger for gore knowns no end.

Europeans stand tall and have every right to stand tall. We alone pulled ourselves up from primitiveness. Our enemies, today, are using minorities merely as leverage to challenge our status quo.

The invention of a history-of-holocausts-leading-to-Auschwitz somehow guiding the West serves to stir up the brutal mobs against our so-called “whiteness”. It’s why they made Swedish people look so evil in that movie Midsommar.

However, this attempt to topple our stature by falsifying our history, to us, is nothing but another local revolt that we’ll smack down as soon as we take a short break from advancing the world.

Our only mistake has been to allow our enemies to speak their minds, not expecting them to use the free word to lie freely.

We have been naive, but we will never make that mistake again.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Who stands to lose the most if Russia were to defeat Ukraine and seize its resources? Short answer: France.

The long answer is that the French still control a hidden colonial empire in West Africa. Countries such as Senegal, Niger, Benin, and several others are using the so-called CFA franc currency, introduced under French colonial rule, and now pegged to the Euro.

This financial pegging provides an important source of wealth to the European Union. It allows Europeans to usurp West-African resources on the cheap, and control African debt, while selling back finished goods at premium markups to the tune of an alleged 500 billion euros in profits per year.

Without this financial infusion, France would have long been a bankrupt backwater populated by a decimated people. A French bankruptcy would collapse the European Union.

Hence, we know the reason why European bureaucrats dream of a ‘Eurafrican Union’, fusing Europe with Africa, as expressed, for example, in the Joint African-EU Strategy document of 2007.

Even as early as 1987, the precursor to the EU, the European Economic Community (EEC), received an application from Morocco to join. Soon followed negotiations with Turkey, and today, a host of non-European nations such as Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia are part of the European Political Community (EPC).

The European Union very much behaves as an expanding empire, it just does so quietly to avoid upset. The backhanded ruler of this empire is French President Emmanuel Macron.

The French are Napoleonic. Have you not wondered why the French President insisted on being included in the Vatican talks between President Trump and Ukrainian leader Zelenskiy? Zelenskiy is Macron’s puppet, for this is France’s war against Russia.

It should be no secret, either, that Russia and its Wagner troops are helping African nations break free from European control, one by one.

Burkina Faso, with its leader Ibrahim Traoré, is leading the breakaway pack, pouring big investments into national industry, cotton plantations, clothing factories, gold refineries, and its own bank, thus cutting European influence off, a direct threat to Europe’s survival.

Traoré has even banned French as the official administrative language, replacing it with native languages. The new uniforms of its judiciary make the country’s judges look royally African instead of ridiculously British.

The war in Ukraine isn’t about Ukraine. The stakes are much higher than that. The war is about preventing Russia from accessing the necessary resources to help further develop a pro-Russian Africa.

It’s why Eurasianist ideologue Alexander Dugin wrote on X that he favors black Cardinal Sarah to become Europe’s new Pope. European geopolitics has become a game of chess during which, all of a sudden, the black pieces have the better strategy, though the hand playing the pieces is a Russian grandmaster.

We Europeans, in the worst-case scenario, must prepare for the death of the French nation, and with it, for the collapse of the European Union. As an upside, this event will free our many and diverse peoples from the straitjacket of political correctness. The multicultural doctrine will come to an end, and our peoples will awaken from the sleep of diversity.

We will begin to see clearly again who are our true enemies.

Europe will not, of course, surrender to Russia. Instead, we must reorganize ourselves into strongly conservative, militaristic nations, under a joint military command, in preparation for the invasion of our continent. For, indeed, a Russian alliance with Africa implies the invasion of Europe. It spells that even Turkey, now officially a NATO ally, will betray us.

Europe’s Final War is going to be that between Christianity and Islam, between White and Black, between Europe and the entire surrounding world. We are facing the religious Holy War of the end-time prophecies, ‘RaHoWa’, Racial Holy War.

Don’t say we haven’t been warned, for over a hundred years ago, in 1923, a German man wrote that,

The animal in man is creeping forward. Africa is darkening up in Europe. We are to be the guardians on the threshold of values.

Due to Europe’s dying, aging demographics, we are already outnumbered. Our vegan soy-men can’t even hold a rifle. Entirely unprepared are we for the black brutality coming our way.

And yet, we shall prevail. We have Father Winter on our side. We know the territory best, and we shall use it to our advantage. The mythical Odin, drunken with war, is awakening in us, and the story of Christ’s resurrection predicts our future.

This is not the end. Europe shall resurrect itself.

Our continent is a weapon that shall trap all those who dare seize it in cold, icy graves.

May Heimdal sound his horn.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

The biggest problem in the West is our people's pathetic acceptance of decline, morally, culturally, physically, spiritually, and mentally. Yet, our media advertise the decline as progress.

The modus operandi of degeneracy follows a blueprint.

First, radical actors normalize extreme crimes, such as bribing poor mothers to give up her newborn baby. Then, they praise gay couples in the West as the perfect parents.

At this point, the common people still have no collective knowledge of the immense crimes being committed against humanity in the name of surrogate motherhood. The debate, if it even ensues, turns against critics who are called homophobic or even child-haters.

No one, not even the smart conservatives, dare ask, "What crime did the unborn child commit to be robbed of a mother as punishment? To be raised by two men and to never know the gentle touch of a woman? To never hear one's mother's voice?"

We're not talking about orphaned babies who lost their parents in a terrible accident. We're talking about children whose mothers and fathers are alive and well, but who felt forced to sell a child for money.

If gay marriage was the slippery slope toward societal breakdown, the commoditization of babies for the gratification of gay couples is the slippery slope toward slavery. For one may buy a baby now, for just 12,000 dollars if it's a White, and for 8,000 dollars if it's a black, but will the commercial buyers sell it on later, perhaps for a profit, after they're done with it? When it's no longer cute? Or when it doesn't match the living room anymore?

Or what if the child becomes naturally belligerent toward its gay creep kidnappers of parents? Will they have it put down like a dog? Or will they have it castrated with hormone blockers to make it gay or trans?

I can see the ads: "A well-raised surrogate child, 3-years-old, now for sale for just 20,000 dollars. We're putting ours up for sale because we've decided to purchase a different one. Paperwork included. No refunds."

These commercial market dynamics imply that children are being bred for profit, already, today.

To be robbed of a mother for a price tag is the most heinous, disgusting crime ever committed against a human being. Yet the degenerate crowd find it already normal. Blinded by their hatred for humanity, which is their self-hatred, all they can think of is to pass on the destruction of their souls to another, innocent victim.

A response is needed. A hard conservatism that crushes this demonic evil.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this episode, I spoke about Africa’s 150-year-long losing streak, ever since the European powers (notably Germany, France, Belgium and Britain) began carving up Africa's resources, roughly around 1870. Africa, at first, saw Europeans as their friends and partners, unaware that Europeans were after their natural wealth. Then, Africans got addicted to German alcohol, and soon, Western corporations began seizing African markets (such as Heineken). The African losing streak can be ended by putting smarter people in charge, but then again, this isn’t my responsibility. I will start focusing on Europe, beginning with the question quo vadis? Where are we headed, what will our future look like?

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Will Western nations remain “free and equal” after natives have become the minorities in their own countries?

The United Kingdom has a caste system. Yes, because many Indian migrants who've come to live in Britain have brought their caste system with them, and they regularly celebrate caste-specific social events. They have not instantly, upon arrival in the West, embraced freedom and equality.

The UK also has Sharia law. Yes, there are at least 85 known Sharia courts operating in Britain. Muslims migrants who've arrived to the West didn't instantly, upon arrival, abandon their oppressive ways and embrace our universal Western values.

Yet, that's what liberal leftists want us to believe. In fact, they insist that migrants coming to the West do so precisely to escape their oppressively primitive regimes and win access to Western values such as equality, democracy, and religious freedom.

Except, they don't embrace our values.

It turns out that White leftists are White Supremacists. For indeed, there are right-wing White Supremacists who believe their people are racially and spiritually superior, but who still, correctly, understand that our values are downstream from race. Meaning, if you change the racial makeup of our countries, our values will begin to change.

But White Leftists who uphold our Western values are also White Supremacists. They believe that the values White people developed over the past centuries are somehow universal and, therefore, in desire. The reality of migrants in the West actively rejecting our value already negates the universality of Western values.

As though the majority of migrants didn't just come for the money? What pressures are put on immigrants to adopt our values, if even the slightest grievances are met with a watering down of our societal norms?

Indeed, despite the Leftist claims that our values are universal and migrants' countries of origin are somehow all authoritarian and primitive, White leftists will instantly water down these values when met with immigrant aggression.

In the UK Parliament, for example, it has been debated whether to allow cousin marriages. But cousin marriages come from a matriarchal culture that oppresses women's freedom to choose a mate. For, a culture of cousin marriages implies that women who wish to marry outside the family are forcibly reeled in and married off to a cousin.

These kinds of marriages are obviously involuntary—they are arranged—and thereby, they negate women's equality and women's rights.

White Leftists don't even bother to think the problem through. In many West European nations, men in their 40s and 50s have arrived from foreign lands with their underage wives—children as young as 6. But instead of arresting these men for pedophilia, their foreign marriages are legally recognized.

Conversely, many a young girl from the West is sent on holidays in far-away lands only to return married to a man in his 50s or 60s—and the marriage will be legally recognized because it wasn't consumed in the West. How is this defending children's rights?

Clearly, the same White leftists who maintain their values are universal and, therefore, superior and correct, don't even bother to defend them.

Then, one day, when White people are solid minorities in their own countries, how should we expect our values to be upheld if the immigrant majority is more interested in Sharia law and caste disparity rather than progress and equality?

This is what's so dangerously naive—and nearly suicidal—about White leftists. Do they truly believe foreigners and immigrants will uphold their precious sexual freedoms once the newcomers are legal and electoral majorities? Once most of Britain's judges are Islamic? And most lawyers are Hindu?

No, they will throw the f*s off rooftops!

Institutions are downstream from culture. If we don't defend our values, no one else will. Migrants are coming to the West for the money, not for the values. They're not abandoning their ways and magically transforming into enlightened yet darker-skinned versions of us.

They, unlike us, will manage to uphold their values.

And for that reason, the White Right, whether conservative or nationalistic, must aggressively take power back from the Left, before it is too late. Before this suicidal liberalism leads to our slavery and genocide.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this episode, I held a brief monologue about the fate of Europe’s “institutions” after the leftist boomers die out. Who will care about democracy, equality, feminism, climate, and so on, after the progressive liberals of the 1968 revolution cease to exist? Not Gen Z. Not even Millennials. The White men won’t care about diverse zoos of nations, and the brown/black men won’t bother to defend them—they have homelands to go back to. What liberal leftists simply don’t understand is that immigrants don’t come to us for equality and democracy. They come to us for diamonds and gold—and for our blood.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

AI was used to dub the original Dutch video into English. (The AI dub sadly does not capture the original emotional voicing.)

On January 10th this year, a Syrian migrant brutally raped a 15-year-old Dutch girl from Uden (Maashorst), The Netherlands. But instead of arresting the rapist, police arrested her father for “rioting” while trying to make a stand for his daughter.

In this emotional appeal to the local council, father Seb van Lier makes a clear case that local authorities have abandoned their native populations.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

Why does the modern state of Israel exist at all? In this podcast episode, I explore the geopolitical reasoning behind cutting the Germans off from trade with the East.

Ultimately, it was the British Empire trying to secure its own relevance, namely by capturing the Suez Canal (from the French), by having Serbian nationalists sabotage Bismarck’s Berlin-Baghdad railroad in 1940, by founding the State of Israel in 1948, by promoting the Cold War, by promoting the Iron Curtain, by pushing the Holocaust narrative, and by blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline.

All these events happened for the same reason: to cut Germany off from trade with the East. If Germany had won WWII, it would have captured the world’s most important trade routes, namely: access to the North Sea and the Atlantic, access to Russia over land (railroads), access to Iraq oil over land plus sea trade through the Persian Gulf with India and China, and access to Mediterranean trade with North Africa.

An Empire under German leadership would have been the most powerful and undefeatable empire in human history. Problem is … the German potential is still there. Hence, the Anglo-American interest in continuing a war with Russia, to cut a German-led Europe off from trade with the East. (The “Russian sanctions” hurt Germany industry the most—which was the intended point.)

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

This episode’s painting I discussed is the Midsummer Eve Bonfire on Skagen Beach(1906) by Peder Severin Krøyer (1851–1909).

In this episode, I discussed my spiritual awakening, and why true salvation doesn’t come from progress, but from a conversion. What we need for the survival of our European peoples is a radical break with the past, and a total dismissal of the present state of things. We shall call the mainstream media “heretics” and condemn them as Satanic. We shall call the political system treasonous and vow to avenge what it has done to our peoples.

The future is prophetic; we need a new prophet willing to convert the people to a new faith: the faith of Europeans willing to call “migrants” slaves and themselves “true citizens”. We need to annul modern national passports and create a new system of identification altogether, based on allegiance to our group. We need to make Europe into Plato’s feared Republic, or into a Spartan Warrior State, or a radically Catholic Theocracy. But whatever we do, continuing along present lines is not an option.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this livestream episode, I spoke at length about Europeans’ options to reconquer their homelands. Should we sacrifice the cities? Should we focus on increasing birth rates? It’s important to revive our heroes, too. We need kids to know about Arminius, Vercingétorix, Rollo, and all the other nearly forgotten heroes of European self-defense and conquest. We can stop feeling ashamed of the past.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this livestream/podcast episode, I spoke about the meaning of the Wild Hunt in Germanic times, about anti-White racism in the TikTok comments radicalizing White women, about the polygenesis theory of human evolution (multiple origins instead of one universal origin), about the need for a counter-revolution against Islam and diversity, about the Talmudic values of Ursula von der Leyen, and about the Trump Tariffs (Trump blinked, China won).

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

In this livestream episode, I discussed the unintended consequences of the Protestant Reformation, launched by Martin Luther in 1527. According to author Brad S. Gregory of The Unintended Reformation, the religious fragmentation that occurred turned our societies into the Woke Dystopia that we know it as today. It turns out that individualism, consumerism, moral and cultural relativism, the excesses of capitalism, pluralism, diversity, and tolerance, and scientific atheism all emerged as consequences of the Protestant Reformation. That idea that people are atomic financial units certainly was not a Catholic principle.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this livestream, I tried playing radio host, giving a live commentary on an interview with former UK Premier Liz Truss. In this candid interview, she gave several clues about how the far-left globalist elites operate:

Globalist elites control the justice system, the judges, and the lawyers
The political system is a distraction
Even if you become prime minister, you won’t have the courts on your side
Ruling elites want to fuse Europe with Islam for profit
But the GDP isn’t even growing, it is still shrinking
Ruling elites may, next, harvest the middle class’s wealth

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

During this livestream, I spent more time discussing the European leadership crisis, Trump seizing opportunities for the USA (American First), and European elites feeling left behind, crying like toddlers, bewildered, not knowing how to deal with the outside world.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this podcast, I discussed the geopolitical rift between the USA and the EU, and then a lively interaction with the audience & their questions. A ton of trolls, as usually, came into the chat to try and insult the speaker, but he handled it with calm and focused responses.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this stream, I discussed the upsides of the Trump Presidency, such as his conservative policies. And I introduced the idea for a European counter-movement dubbed The Reaction.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Also available on YouTube »

In this livestream episode, I spoke at length about different topics intertwining with the idea of the Forest. The forest, in this sense, is a fertile soil and a source of eternal renewal. It is the opposite of the Sea, where we cannot grow anything. The Sea is like a desert, and it is the domain of highly technologized civilizations seeking to maximize profits.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Also available on YouTube »

Every dwindling end has a vigorous new beginning.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Also available on YouTube »

In this productive TikTok podcast, I mused about the impact of technology on humanity. At first, new inventions offered ordinary individuals great leaps forward. Progress felt real because it was real.

But the Wall Street era of “Big Tech” has twisted technology around. No longer a beneficial development, modern technology has become a gigantic scam meant to rob the Western middle classes of their real wealth.

One might even say there isn’t such a thing as “progress” at all. Rather, there is growth and sacrifice. The White middle classes of the West have grown wealthy and powerful during the 19th and 20th centuries.

Now, the middle classes are being sacrificed like cash cows in order to fund the growth of immigrant populations.

Elon Musk, in fact, may be a genius. He’s a genius because, like no other, he has mastered the art of conning people into buying Tesla stock.

By dangling images of Hyperloops and Neuralinks in front of people as the donkey’s carrot on a stick, he has tricked people into sacrificing their real wealth for the false promise of a multi-planetary space civilization.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this episode, I spoke about Trump announcing he’ll accept 600 billion $ worth of investments from the Saudi Arabians. But what exactly will he be able to offer in return? Well: landmarks, farmland, resources, and infrastructure. And of course the Islamization of the USA. It begs the question whether American elites know that the USA is technically bankrupt, and they’ve started selling out their country.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this livestream, I entertain the possibility to turn Europe into an authoritarian patriarchal theocracy. Can we even do away with the concept of money? Or at least refocus our attention toward spiritual matters, rather than purely economic motives.

Find my books on Amazon »

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

During this Livestream, I discussed whether the USA is still an attractive destination for Europeans. I don't think so. I don't perceive the USA as a better place to live. Perhaps Europe can focus on fixing its housing crisis, so that young European women can start having families again. Europe could then become the polar opposite of the USA, a safe haven for White children.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

This was a productive livestream episode I held on my TikTok channel. I spoke about the number of days worked throughout history. It turns out that medieval Europeans used to work about 125 days out of a year. Compared to over 300 today for ordinary employees. People are overworked because they are robbed of their free time to develop themselves and their personalities. Since you can’t work more than 365 days a year, the global economy is limited by the supply of humans. And this supply, too, has its limits. People, tired of being overworked, may turn to the off-the-grid lifestyles of the Amish and others alike. By realizing that we possess within ourselves potential skills and competencies, we can start cutting loose from our oppressive economic “governments”.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

A sort of special edition livestream in honor of the Americans who may be cut off from using TikTok coming Sunday. This over 2-hour long episode has me discussing a great deal of topics with my lively audience.

Also available on YouTube »

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Live stream recorded on TikTok on Wednesday, 15th of January, in which I discussed several topics: What might be the basis of differences in work ethic between different kinds of people? How can the common people fight the opposing elite interests that hurt them? Is the mythical far right almost a psy-op in Europe? Is Elon Musk really the CEO running his businesses or is he more like a marketing billboard?

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

In this livestream episode, hosted on my TikTok channel, I discussed the yet unfolding grooming scandal in Britain. Over 50 towns, most of them in Northern England, have seen rape squads of a certain shared ethnicity targeting girls for being White and Christian. But details about the mass rape of almost 250,000 girls have been aggressively suppressed by the government and by the media. Until past Christmas, when certain details emerged from court documents about these gang rapes. What ensued was a wave of attention for the topic from social media influencers such as myself, ultimately forcing the regular media to have another look at the matter.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Also available on YouTube »

In this livestream episode, I spoke about Europe's industrial collapse, and about how that might benefit Europeans in the long run, as it will force us to disconnect from globalism.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Also available on YouTube »

In this livestream episode, I spoke about materialism and the age of decline, and the potential return of a prophet who can guide humanity toward an entirely new way of living.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Also available on YouTube »

In this podcast episode, I elucidate the enigma of sleep. A science article I read stated that science doesn’t know why mammals, birds, and fish need sleep. And then I recognized a host of other questions that modern science also doesn’t know to answer: What is time? What is space? What is motion? What is thinking? What is consciousness? Why do we sleep? In my view, all of these questions have something in common, namely that there is a spiritual, non-material dimension to our reality, and that is where we find the answers science couldn’t find.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Also available on YouTube »

In this mind-twisting podcast, I attempt to reveal that our perceived reality has been a ‘choice’, and that we have the opportunity to choose differently. I refer to Martin Heidegger’s comments on technology, and explain how everything in existence on our planet has been demoted to what he called “standing reserves”. Even human beings have become such standing reserves—caches of people waiting to be put to use for war or profit (“human resources”).

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

In this livestream episode, I spoke to my audience about several books I’ve read that I thought were worth mentioning and discussing.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Also available on YouTube »

In this livestream episode, I discussed an article by Louise Perry (author of The Case against the Sexual Revolution). Her article on "Modernity's Self-Destruct Button" touches on a mass of topics I've spoken to you about on my TikTok channel. Glad to see that more people are thinking along the same lines. It's clear that the Reactionary Right's predictions are the ones that will come true: modernity isn't going to last. We will eventually return to a pre-industrial age, perhaps a new Bronze Age, without electricity, without oil, but with horses and wood-burning stoves. In the end, religious fundamentalists such as the Amish or the Mennonites may be the having the last laugh.

Louise Perry's article: https://www.firstthings.com/article/2024/12/modernitys-self-destruct-button

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

During this livestream, I spoke about media ignoring non-white perpetrators, while selling the suggestion they might have been White. Media sell us the fiction of the Great White Evil. I also spoke about our march through the institutions, winning back influence and power. But not to oversee a society we no longer care about. The idea is to win back the power to create a society we can care about again.

Get full access to Johannes MK's Newsletter at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube » | Find all my links here »

I discuss an article written by Mees Baaijen, a Dutch author who represents a sort of Chomskyite anti-globalism. I attempt to understand the alternate history that explains our present time. Baaijen’s book is titled “The Predators and the People”.

It seems—interestingly—that the anti-globalist Left and the anti-globalist Right are on the same page, namely that 1) a financial cabal has subjugated our peoples, 2) scientific materialism was a scam meant to strip us of our religiosity, and 3) word of a multipolar world is meant to disguise the wealth transfer from the USA to China, bankrupting the West.

Where I probably deviate from Mees Baaijen is that the anti-globalist Right isn’t interested in fusing the world’s peoples into one giant working class against the ‘‘Arch-Fascist”, but rather to return to our ethno-nationalist roots and do away with diversity.

Note: After reviewing this podcast, I got the feeling that China is behind pitting Russia against NATO, by playing both sides, and that people who say “White men should step back to give the others a chance” are operatives paid for by China.

The globalist Cabal (who never liked White people anyway) want to destroy the Western world and to subjugate the White patriarchy to a global matriarchy. In my view, we should revolt against this enslavement to China by refusing to cooperate.

We, Europeans, can transform Europe into the “pain in the globalists’ ass”.

Get full access to Johannes MK's Newsletter at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

In this podcast/livestream episode, I discuss the tech billionaires trying to escape from humanity. They want to flee into their bunkers, but have they really thought about the collapse of energy systems? Can they survive without electricity? How will they charge their robots? The truth is, the billionaires would be better off starting food-producing estate high up in the mountains, surviving with mountain goats as pastoralists.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

In this episode of my podcast, I spoke about how patriarchies may develop from matriarchies. My theory goes as follows: In societies ruled by women, meaning societies in which women control the wealth and food, most men must live by women’s rules in hopes of being fed. A majority of men in matriarchy may find they have no purpose. There is nothing to do for them. But in certain conditions, such ‘discarded’ men may find a way out, for example, with pastoralism. I believe that the men of the Eurasian steppe lands, such as our Yamnaya ancestors, learned they could milk horses and live off churned butter and yogurt, and occasional meat harvests. By chasing and controlling herds of livestock, the men became independent from women’s agricultural societies. By choosing freedom from women, these men also discovered equality. The men learned that they could be allies, and relative equals, even if in a male hierarchy. These bands of men became the feared ‘Männerbünde’ that would conquer North-Western India and Europe as the Aryan invaders who would also become their conquered societies’ ruling classes.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

I wanted to crack the code: Why are ethnic European people so different from other races?

And I started with the peculiar observation that ethnic European children born and raised in Western societies can almost all recognize themselves in the mirror by age 12 to 18 months, whereas, for example, African children from Kenya or Cameroon, barely seem to be able to do so by age five.

Only less that 4% of children were able to recognize themselves in the mirror by 18 months. And no, exposure to mirrors does not seem to influence this behavior.

Why is it so? I suspected that there is a spectrum ranging from social cultures, such as those of chimpanzees, dolphins, and ethnic European humans, to cultures that tend to isolate or discard lower-ranking males, a practice found among gorillas, lions, horses, and many African, Asian, and Amerindian cultures, namely cultures that favor one or two dominant males but who treat other males as socially inferior.

I began researching this problem by starting with the following hypotheses:

Self-recognition is the basis for social equality. Meaning, if you cannot recognize yourself in a mirror, you are equally unlikely to recognize another member of your group as an equal. Think of cats and dogs trying to attack their mirror image. They clearly perceive their mirror image as a separate being, and as socially inferior.
Western, or rather, ethnic European children, do so well on the Mirror Self-Recognition test because in their culture, males also regard other male members of their group as their relative equals, even if unrelated, whereas males of other races tend to treat unfamiliar men as socially inferior (like the cats and dogs attacking their mirror images). In fact, there is a saying in India that goes, the tears of strangers are just water. It means they don’t feel obligated to help people they’re not related.
Patriarchal societies produce greater equality precisely by allowing men to cooperate in more equalized social settings, even if in a hierarchy where the lowest soldier is still considered human, whereas in matriarchal societies, in which females prefer one or two large and dominant males, the lesser males are considered socially inferior, and therefore, matriarchal societies produce less equality because they have to discard the unwanted males.

A quick review of known facts easily verifies my hypotheses:

Indeed, Western children, meaning children born and raised in patriarchal social settings, are quickest to recognize themselves in the mirror, whereas children from matriarchal or matrilocal societies are slowest to do so, such as children from Kenya or those among the Cameroonian Nso people.
According to Wikipedia’s List of matrilineal or matrilocal societies, indeed, we find matriarchal types of societies predominantly among Africans, Asians, and Native Americans, but none among modern Europeans with the exception of the Basque people, and rural Danish people.
According to research on the Mirror Self-Recognition test, indeed, mammalian cultures that tended to discard their unwanted males—such as customary among gorillas, lions, and bears—failed the test, whereas more social groups of mammals that allowed males opportunities to coexist with the females—such as among the chimpanzees, bonobos, and orangutans—passed the test.

Note that Western gorillas that lived among humans—meaning, among Western scientists from patriarchal societies—tended to do better on the mirror test, and some even succeeded. Also note that among the bonobos, although they are called matriarchal, they do have males leaders, and, unlike matriarchal species, they do not discard their males.

And so, in conclusion,

Equality among males produces patriarchal societies, increasing male cooperation in the form of established hierarchies that soothe aggression among males;
Matriarchal societies favor one or two big and dominant males but must discard other males and treat them as lesser, thus creating a two-tiered society that forces males to fight all other males.
And, therefore, it is bizarre that Western feminist women now say they wish to deconstruct the patriarchy, while somehow maintaining equality, since equality produces patriarchies and patriarchies socialize men to treat others equally, whereas matriarchal societies teach men to treat others as inferiors and to fight, at all cost, to win the position of dominant male.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

A bit of a strange topic but perhaps worth a listen. We don't just inherit DNA, we also inherit (parts of) our parents' souls. And the way this "soul transfer" takes place heavily influences your life outcome. Can one also shed negative influences and rewrite them into more useful traits?

All people are reincarnations of ancient archetypes, but some more than others. In this podcast, I tried explaining my concept of "soul transfer", or how we all inherit the example of our parents, our elders, or our God. And why a godless society produces sterile people.

(If you can, Support my Kickstarter project »)

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this video, I tried explaining why the power process and the loss of access thereto signal a psychological breakdown that may precede a larger economic breakdown of the Western world.

People are effectively tired of not having any kind of personal agency or autonomy or free will in the work that they do, and so more people are looking for a way out to escape what feels like an eternal purgatory.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

This was a livestream I did on TikTok. I spoke about van life, off-the-grid living, guerilla pastoralism and other new avenues for people fed up with urban office life. I also explained how Darwinian evolution has a flaw: it reduces people to selfish genes when, in reality, we evolve as cultures.

https://www.tiktok.com/@thegreatjmk

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

I’ve sighted the first Ukrainian woman abroad alongside her black (French) boyfriend. While 600,000 Ukrainian men have likely died already in that meaningless meat grinder called “the War for Starbucks Profits”, Ukrainian women don’t seem to care. Though women may volunteer for war, the sheer majority of casualties has been male.

The real enemy, perhaps, isn’t even globalism, but women—women who seem to hate their own brothers, sons, fathers, and uncles so much they willingly discard them. The real-time footage coming out of Ukraine and its frontlines seems to suggest precisely this.

And it’s not the first time I’ve heard of this phenomenon. When German war hero Ernst Jünger volunteered to go to war in World War I, he wrote in his diary about the young women in their tennis gear waving at the trains full of young men being shipped away for war. Like cattle on the way to their destruction.

The question, from a man’s perspective, becomes: Have the women ever cared about us men at all? Have they always used us merely to acquire their stupid luxury things? And when they could no longer use us to win more wealth, have they traditionally always discarded us in favor of the next financial opportunity?

What men at the front lines of war don’t get is that their mothers don’t love them, and their wives and girlfriends are disloyal w****s. Besides, the women are wrong. They'll have it worse than before as the globalist elites use them to breed an ever lower-cost race of laborers.

I called it from the start, more than two years ago: The Ukraine war is a fake war meant to cull white European men from existence so that they may be replaced with immigrant men from Nigeria, Ethiopia, India or Pakistan. And the white women of Ukraine and Europe are happily going along with this exchange program. It’s the women, after all, calling for open borders and diversity because they think it will make them rich.

They’re completely stupid. They’re evil. They’re possessed by demons of greed. Our primary enemy, then, isn’t this or that version of globalism, but the matriarchy. European men should prepare themselves for a total war on the women until we have established a new spiritual dominance over them, collectively. This we achieve through the complete eradication of the wealth-based culture, of materialism.

We must, by all means necessary, install a brutal regime of dominance over the female desire for wealth and luxury. Our mission, to make it clear, is to completely and utterly eradicate women’s insane materialism, and to purge all those women who cannot let go of their greed.

It’s time to quit waging wars for profit and to start waging wars for the patriarchy.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

In this podcast episode, I discuss the Dugin interview with Tucker Carlson. Dugin, in my view, is right about Western individualism. It has gone too far and it is destroying our people—on purpose because atomized individuals can’t fight back against tyranny. The people who rule us are very much ethno-centric, they just don’t want you to be.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Support my Kickstarter project here »

I will not be using any AI. This project will be composed and produced by a human being (me).

Despite Richard Wagner's 15-hour-long Ring cycle about Wotan, the Valkyries, and Siegfried, the master composer only briefly touched upon Old Norse mythology and extant Germanic literature.

So, by bringing back the lost artform of the symphonic poem, popularized during the late 19th century, I will compose a series of poems for the full orchestra.

I intend to compose and produce a 60-70 minute long classical album. Each poem will have the length of a movement (e.g., 2-10 minutes) and shall musically express the poetry from the Edda, such as the Lay of Thrym, or the Icelandic sagas, or extant German literature such as Thidrekssaga.

I will obviously avoid themes already treated by Richard Wagner, and my compositions will be musically original works. My symphonic poems are intended as stand-alone works of art that can be played individual--quite the opposite of a Total Artwork (Gestamtkunstwerk).

In terms of production, I will use excellent computer libraries to simulate a full orchestra. However, if the funding far exceeds what I'm asking for, I will consider hiring a full orchestra for the recording of the CD. So make sure to tell your classical music friends about this endeavor in order to get the best quality!

Support here:

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/teutoburg/symphonic-poems-of-valhalla

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

I recorded this three-part video on TikTok, put together here as a single video podcast. The Germans of the 1930s had discovered an awful truth: Rural Germans who had moved to the big cities during the Industrial Age had all died out by the 5th or 6th generation, without exception. Tracking the last names of people who moved to the urban center, they noticed the names eventually completely disappeared from the record, suggesting their extinction.

It turns out, cities are just population sinkholes that capture surplus populations. Rural peoples tend to have highest fertility but no “room” for housing surplus children. In rural societies, at least in the European tradition, only the first son and the first daughter get to inherit a farm (the girl marries into another farm). Surplus siblings either become unmarried farmhands or they move to the city, where their labor is exploited to produce the illusion of progress and wealth.

But the wealth cities provide may very well be a trick to soothe people who might otherwise revolt against their less fertile condition. It really isn’t hard to imagine that concrete urban zones produce less fertile people than natural environments. Of course, the majority of human beings shall remain in complete denial of this reality, namely that wealth, fame, money, power, luxury goods, fine foods, and status contribute absolutely nothing to one’s lineages’ survival. Only control of fertile land does.

While other races are now mass migrating their surplus children to the big cities, we in the West must therefore plan for escaping the cities by adopting an anti-materialist religion.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

In this live stream, I discussed the potential for an American “French Revolution”, which I think was funded by the French elites (the richest in Europe). These elites tried to crack down on their people’s well-being, fearing that the people might revolt against them. We see the birth of the same in the USA: the LGBT, the attack on birth sex, the attack on family, Christianity, and pregnancies … all are attacks on the productive capacities of the common people. Elites want people to be atomic individuals. It’s why our elites love robots so much. Our ruling classes are pure evil. They are our enemies.

And I discuss notes from the book War as an Inner Experience by Ernst Jünger.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

The Guardian posted an article that breaches the Woke Code of Conduct. British elites seems to understand very well how the West got rich—not through theft but through industry. And to create said industry, the West first invented the political and legal frameworks required to make investing in the future rational.

Watch on YouTube »

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

In this podcast, I spoke at length about what aspects of oneself are important to become aware of: giftedness, intelligence, strong-willedness, or being effectively an outsider of humanity. The point is that an unexamined life may lower our quality of life. Instead of feeling guilty or depressed trying to “fit in”, it’s important to know where such feelings come from. Usually, the come from a suppression or repression of parts of ourself that we feel set us apart.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

Western “leftists” think the war in Ukraine is about defeating a “fascist” Putin. In reality, Ukraine is more about protecting Western colonial interests in Africa.

France still controls about 14 African nations with its French franc currency, issued by the French central bank. That way, France can get these nations to give up their resources on the cheap—benefiting not only the French economy but also the Anglo-American Empire.

Without these resources, France would be bankrupted, and the other EU nations would have to foot the bill. The EU wouldn’t survive, and EU markets would fall to Russia. Russia’s Wagner has been ousting French/European influence in the West-African region. Several French media, for example, have recently been banned.

West Africans, under the influence of TikTok, have been experiencing an awakening. In fact, this is probably why my TikTok accounts were banned (under NATO pressure), because my videos about this issue went viral on the African side of TikTok.

In this podcast episode, I give an overview of our geopolitical situation.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

Imagine Frank Herbert's novel Dune was about real-world geopolitics. The House of Atreides is really the British Empire, the Harkonen are the technologically gifted Germans, the planet Arakkis is Arabia, and spice is Arab oil. As in the novel, the Atreides beating the Harkonen, the British beat the German Empire.

German industry had become such a threat by the 1920s that the British sought to discredit the German racial unity underpinning the new German nation founded by Otto von Bismarck.

If Anglo-American media today say they hate racism it's out of purely cynical motives, namely they fear a racial unity between white Europeans and White Russians because they might upset the New World Order.

Their solutions is to throw White Russians and Europeans into a meat grinder, a meaningless war that already started in Ukraine. The war, of course, is entirely fake.

The war with Russia exists only as a pretext to begin purging those pesky White Germanic types from the genetic record so that they may never defeat the Anglo-American leadership and its banking interests.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Available on YouTube

I spoke about the relation between the Soul, body, mind, spirit, and our gut feeling, trying to figure out our connection to the natural world. And then I interacted with the general public and their questions in this live stream replay. See the transcript or watch the video.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

I’ve read a bit over 1,200 books in my life and although that’s nowhere near the 30,000 some other guy read, I have reduced my reading list to 30 favorites I believe may be helpful to the Right Revival. In my live stream episode, I discussed a summary of these books and what I find useful about them. These books have certainly influenced my thinking. Find the original TikTok video here.

James C. Scott’s Against the Grain (and also Seeing Like a State)
Murray N. Rothbart’s Anatomy of the State
William Coopers’s Behold a Pale Horse
Angelus Silesius’s Cherubinic Wanderer
Joseph Goebbels’ Communism with the Mask Off
Akio Nakatani’s Death Object
Ernst Jünger’s The Forest Passage
Harold Innis’ Empire and Communications
Anonymous author’s God and Folk: Soldierly Affirmation
Rodney Stark’s God’s Battalions
Desiderius Erasmus’ Handbook for the Militant Christian
Paul Johnson’s Intellectuals
Ernst von Salomon’s It Cannot Be Stormed
Seymour Lipset & Earl Raab’s Jews and the New American Scene
Ernst Schertel’s Magic
Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations
Joseph Campbell’s Myths to Live By
Robert Glover’s No More Mr. Nice Guy
Karl Wittfogel’s Oriental Despotism
Oswald Spengler’s Prussianism and Socialism
C. Hallpike’s Ship of Fools
Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse Five
Ted Kaczynski’s The Unabomber Manifesto
William H. Calvin’s The Ascent of Mind
Amaury de Riencourt’s The Coming Caesars
Stephan Grundy’s The Cult of Odin
Paul Colinvaux’s The Fates of Nations
David Anthony’s The Horse, the Wheel, and Language
Eric Hoffer’s The True Believer
John Dunn’s Traditionalism

And I would add Joseph Tainter’s The Collapse of Complex Societies as well.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Replay of my latest live stream I held on TikTok. I spoke about a host of matters and spent time answering people’s questions, such as how to get organized offline without leaving a paper trail, without leaving a digital trail.

Recorded on February 20th, 2024

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube »

I spoke to one of TikTok’s smart women on religion, materialism, return to tradition, overcoming the fear of death, integrating one’s shadow, finding a purpose in life, feminism and effeminacy in men, freeing one’s mind from commercial culture, Jordan Peterson’s individualism, and the inevitable collapse of Western societies.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

I did a written interview with the Unbekoming blog, and I made a live stream about it. I speak about a broad range of topics from the competency crisis to diversity to the farmer’s protests in The Netherlands.

Watch the video by clicking on the thumbnail.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Livestreamed on TikTok on January 30th. I will keep doing weekly livestreams. Watch the replay here (click on the video). I spoke about the consequences of the endless mass immigration into Europe, and the lack of direction for our peoples. Will we abandon modernity as the Luddites did in response to the Industrial Revolution? Will we go off-the-grid and live on as the Amish do? One thing we certainly shouldn’t do is submit to foreigners.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Since YouTube just gave me another strike, I decided to stop posting there. From now on, I will post my live stream replays and podcast videos here, on my SubStack. Which is great, because I can send them out as newsletters, too.

Going forward, I will likely keep doing weekly Tuesday 8pm UTC+2 live streams via TikTok, and will then repost the streams here. You will be notified automatically if you are a subscriber to my newsletters.

My archive of previous streams is still on YouTube @thegreatjohannes

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

All my links: https://linkin.bio/johannesmk

Men of the West must dominate their living space with the architecture most beneficial to our people’s well-being. We must do away with relativist notions of there not being a ‘real’ reality. We recognize that the male-dominated physical world exists to shape the female psychological world.

Either we shape our space, or others will.

I'm going to get a little bit philosophical here because, for a long time, I used to go along with what Friedrich Nietzsche once wrote about the nature of reality. Nietzsche thought there was no such thing as ‘real’ reality, and that everything that we perceive is just “lyingly added”—by your mind, your imagination.

The “apparent" world is the only one: the “real” world has only been lyingly added.(Nietzsche in Twilight of the Idols)

Another German philosopher, Martin Heidegger, whose genius remains unparalleled to this day, took this Nietzschean notion even further to the extreme. Heidegger went on to suggest, in his later philosophy, that there is no real distinction anymore between what you observe and what you imagine.

Heidegger believed observations and perceptions were merely different qualities of the same thing. If you were able to somehow very deeply very strongly imagine something and thereby make it real, is a very powerful premise. It would suggest magic and manifestation work.

But I no longer believe this, for I realize now that Nietzsche and Heidegger were perpetuating a feminine version of reality while simply ignoring the masculine “thing-world” called physical reality.

One of the arguments that Martin Heidegger used, for example, to deconstruct the physical reality is, well, the fact that objects can all be deconstructed into atoms and quantum spins, and down to stardust if not merely energy. The idea is to dismiss the physical world as mere mental fiction, opening the door to “universal interconnectedness” and other “borderless world” fantasies.

I, however, cannot see the atoms in a wall. How, then, can you use an imagination—the atom—to argue that what I can perceive somehow isn't real? And so here I think Heidegger and Nietzsche did something wrong. They used their imagination of atoms to deconstruct something I perceive as a wall.

Right now, the wall behind me is not a collection of atoms, it is a wall. Now, although it might perhaps be possible to destroy this wall and to pulverize it into separate atoms, as long as this has not been done, the wall is still really a wall.

What does all of this have anything to do with me saying that it is important for men to dominate the public sphere with their architecture? I came to realize something very different from what Nietzsche and Heidegger used to profess, namely that the nature of reality betrays that reality has a feminine dimension and a masculine dimension to it.

The feminine dimension is the inner world of thoughts, feelings, and imaginations. The masculine dimension is precisely that of the things and objects of the physical world.

Men win mastery over their physical world through the acquisition of skills and competencies (muscle, knowledge, tools, organization, etc.), whereas women try to influence this world through the manipulation of men and perhaps even through spiritual manifestation.

Now imagine the world as it is becoming overly feminized, a world where people reduce everything to merely thoughts and ideas and words, rather than the actual physical things that they are. What happens when we deny the "Thing-World” in favor of a simulation or a dream?

You end up in a situation where the female tries to dominate the male. The feminine dimension says that everything is relative.

But it seems to be so—from the looks of it—that the physical world possesses a natural dominance over the spiritual world of women. I mean, our minds are contained within our physical bodies and not necessarily the other way around.

The physical male comforts the woman’s emotions, i.e., the physical world contains our minds in it. Were we to reverse this, and say that the universe is a giant God-Mind (or Goddess-Mind) in which our bodies are simulations, then we have allowed the feminine to engulf the male. Which is the end point of feminism.

If you don't like a certain group of people's feelings, emotions, imaginations, ideologies, religions, and so on, you may go to war with them and physically dominate them. A militia may round up and imprison woke activists, removing their weird ideas from society.

The physical, therefore, can always restrain the mental imaginations of entire groups of people, and of individuals. These are, of course, the sort of restraints that leftists find “oppressive”. Indeed, in a universalistic conception of reality, there can be no borders, and every sort of madness must be allowed to co-exist.

The male-dominated physical sphere traditionally serves as a constraint to such madness. And it is therefore so very important that the men of the West take back their public sphere and dominate it with their architecture. In architecture and in infrastructure, we find the first man-made shaping of the world.

Do we want to live as terminates in a giant global ant colony, for example? Or do we prefer the small towns? Do we prefer pastoralism or grain agriculture? All these decisions are traditionally made by men shaping their world.

We must also conclude that the feminine forces have become overly dominant, or rather domineering. The balance between male and female has been disturbed, and it is up to the remaining men to restore it.

It is truly problematic, for example, that modern architects are even allowed to construct their buildings. It is problematic that Muslims in Europe are allowed to build their mosques, and so on. We allow them to dominate our public sphere.

In any version of the future where our movement gains momentum again, it must lead to the fact that we shall begin to dominate the public sphere again with our architecture, by which I mean our way of shaping the physical world, with buildings and infrastructure and art that we prefer, art that we find beautiful, as opposed to what we don't find beautiful, the modern art, for example, or the Islamic architecture.

To put ourselves back in the seat of power means: to also begin to sabotage and attack this foreign architecture in our sphere, and to replace it with our own. Though the creation of healthy architecture may be difficult, the destruction of what we find unhealthy is going to be easy.

And I think this is a very big goal for our movement: to take back the architecture and to dominate the public sphere. For it is through our mastery of our physical world that we become the dominant leaders of that space—again.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube instead »

After discussing Alex Jones’ being a US intelligence asset, whose job it was to discredit the 9/11 Truther movement, I go on to talk at length about the meaning of the NordStream attack. They were an act of war on Europeans by the USA and with the support of a treasonous Norwegian elite. The Norwegian elite will understand that, someday, they will have to pay for the attack on their brothers.

I misgendered my latest episode by calling it 53, but this is the real episode 53 of my podcast The Great Johannes (also available on YouTube).

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube instead

The video got cut off at 42m. I was talking about the relationship between people, their average IQ, and the sort of societies they can build.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube instead »

What makes whites so different from the rest of humanity? Answer: We abide by a different morality that cannot be imposed onto others. We are psychologically different from non-whites.

Commentary courtesy of https://www.tiktok.com/@kawalangdalawahan

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch the video on YouTube

Using Google’s Ngram Viewer, it’s possible to paint a more accurate picture of our history. Did you know, for example, that the push for a “scientific worldview” coincided perfectly with the Apollo Space Program? Or that hardly anyone wrote of shared “Judeo-Christian” values until after the Second World War?

In this video, I process seemingly random terms that, taken together, explain our true history, at least for the past 500 years. Referring to the English-speaking world of the West, I identify four ages:

1450-1600 AD: Age of Quiet Beginnings (Plato, Hermetics, etc.)
1600-1750 AD: Age of Religion, Christianity, growth
1750-1900 AD: Age of Civilization, colonialism, reflection
1900-2050 AD: Age of the Middle Class, science fiction, wealth, and decline

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

In this podcast episode, I discuss the importance of and need for better male role modules that are derived from the culture, the mythology, and perhaps religion. I have spoken about this topic before but felt the need to flesh out some new insights.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch the replay on YouTube

The live-streamed podcast was aired on TikTok on November 12th, 2023. I am reading chapter 8 of my book Eternal Struggle. I argue that it’s better to rely on “common sense” (the ignorant approach) than on abstract mental fictions (the scientific approach).

Link to my book:https://www.amazon.com/Eternal-Struggle-Exposing-Scientific-Worldview/dp/1699852480

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

This podcast was originally streamed live on TikTok. (The show will be auto-posted to Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, but this may take some time.)

Countries like Turkey and Morocco have sent millions of their people into the European Union as immigrants. And they are happy to provide their descendants with passports to their home nations, even allowing their expatriates to vote in homeland elections. Imagine if The Netherlands would offer the Afrikaner Boer people in South Africa the same courtesy. Should white people from the former colonies have the right to return to Europe? I believe so.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

I am talking you through the F-Scale test by Theodore Adorno (a Marxist intellectual who wrote the book on the Authoritarian Personality). Adorno was very subjective in his dismissal of the Right Wing, and his test is somewhat problematic.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube (originally streamed on TikTok)

In this livestream podcast, I discussed the Israel-Palestine conflict from a geopolitical point of view, I talked about the meaning of history and civilization, Nietzsche’s concept of the Eternal Return, Oswald Spengler’s and Arnold Toynbee’s concepts of cyclical civilization, and the Collapse of Complex Societies by Joseph Tainter, and Gail Tverberg.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube,

Replay of my Livestream where I talk about the possibilities for a new Homeland for European people.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

Livestream replay, original stream date Sep 28th, 2023.

Get full access to JMK at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

I’ve taken the liberty to edit the ancient Lay of Thrym, a poem from the Poetic Edda. Unlike other Eddic stories that have been Christianized to some extent, this poem has retained its heathen character. Worries, guilt, and shame lead to a sense of duty, and to ultimate victory over a race of greedy trolls (the giants).

The loss of Thor’s hammer represents his masculinity, his phallus. But without masculine men, a society cannot defend itself against the trolls and giants who would immediately occupy Asgard. Thor can only regain his pride by overcoming his shame, and by defeating the trolls who stole his hammer.

The Lay of Thrym

Thor was angry when he woke up and noticed his hammer was missing. His hair upright, his beard bristling, Earth’s son felt all around himself. And the first words he found to say were these:

“Listen to what I have to say now, Loki. No one else on earth or in heaven knows it—the hammer of the Æsir has been stolen!”

Thor and Loki went to find fair Freya’s homestead and these were the first words Thor found to say,

“Freya, will you lend me your feather dress so I can find my hammer?”

Freya said,

“Yes, I would give you the dress, even though it were of gold, and I give it to you as if it were of silver.”

Then Loki flew, his feather-dress whirring, until he had left Asgard, the gardens of the gods, and arrived at Jotenheim, the home of the giants. Thrym, king of the giants, sat on a burial mound, twisting bands of gold as collars for his b*s, trimming the manes of his mares.

Thrym said,

“What’s up with the gods? What’s up with the elves? Why have you come to Jotenheim by yourself?”

Loki said:

“The gods and the elves fare ill. Have you hidden Thor’s hammer?”

Thrym said,

“I have hidden Thor’s hammer eight leagues deep down in the earth. No one gets it back unless they bring me Freya to be my wife.”

Then Loki flew, his feather-dress whirring, until he had left Jotenheim and until he was inside Asgard.

He met Thor in the middle of the gardens, and these were the first words Thor found to say:

“Do you have news, or did you work for nothing? Say your tidings now, from the sky. A messenger’s story is lost if he sits; if he lies down, he’s sure to lie.”

Loki said,

“I have toiled and I have news. Thrym, the king of the giants, has your hammer. No one shall get it back unless he wins Freya to be his wife.”

Loki and Thor went to find fair Freya, and these were the first words Thor found to say:

“Bind on the bridal linen, Freya. The two of us must haste to the home of the giants.”

Freya was angry and snorted with such rage that the hall of the Æsir shook below and broke her mighty Brising necklace,

“I would look very lustful if I went to Jotenheim with you.”

Later, all the Æsir met at a council and the goddesses all spoke, too, to discuss and decide how to get back Thor’s hammer.

Then Heimdall, the whitest of the gods who knew the future well, said,

“Bind the bridal linen on Thor, let him wear the great Brising necklace. Let keys jingle from his waist, and women’s clothes fall to his knee, and broad stones on his chest, and put something fitting on his head.”

Then the mighty god Thor answered,

“The gods would call me unmanly if I let them bind the bridal linen on me!”

Then Loki, Laufey’s son, said,

“Silence, Thor, watch your language. The giants will immediately inhabit Asgard unless you get your hammer back.”

They bound the bridal linen on Thor, and the great Brising necklace, and let keys jingle from his waist, and women’s clothes fall to his knee, and broad stones on his chest, and put something fitting on his head.

Then Laufey’s son, Loki, said,

“I will also go with you as your handmaid. The two of us must go to Jotenheim.”

Later, the goats were driven from the hall of the gods. Rushing against the wagon’s shaft, they ran so fast mountains broke and flames burnt the earth, and so Odin’s son went to Jotenheim.

Then Thrym, king of the giants, said: “

Stand up, giants, and throw straw on the benches to make them soft. Now, I will win Freya to be my wife, Earth’s daughter from Noah’s garden. Here, in my garden, I have gold-horned cows, and jet-black oxen, a delight for the giant. I own many treasures, I own a lot of jewelry, only my Freya seems to be lacking.”

Evening came quickly and beer was brought to the giants. Thor, dressed as Freya, ate one of the oxen by himself, eight salmon, and all the delicacies that were set for the women. Loki, dressed as Sif, Thor’s wife, drank three gallons of mead.

Then the lord of the giants Thrym said,

“Who ever saw a bride with such a sharp bite? I have never seen a bride with such a broad bite, nor a maid who drank any more mead.”

The all-wise handmaid who sat in front of him found an answer to the giant’s question:

“Freya hasn’t eaten for eight nights, so mad-keen she was about going to Jotenheim.”

The giant bent down under the bridal linen, desiring a kiss, but then jumped up all the way to the end of the hall:

“Why are Freya’s eyes to fierce? It appears to me as if fire is burning from her eyes.”

The all-wise handmaid who sat in front of him found an answer to the giant’s question:

“Freya hasn’t slept at all for eight nights, so mad-keen she was about going to Jotenheim.”

Then the lord of the giants Thrym said,

“Bring in the hammer to hallow the bride. Lay Mjölnir on the maiden’s knees, so we can bless Freya’s hands together.”

Thor laughed with spirits in his chest when the hard-minded one recognized his hammer. He killed Thrym first, the lord of the giants, and then he destroyed the whole race of the giants. He killed the old giant’s sister who had asked him for the bridal fee. She suffered a resounding blow for the money and for each of the rings she took.

And so, Odin’s son got his hammer back.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

Western people descend from pastoralists who ate a diet of high-cholesterol foods such as red meats, eggs, and dairy products. By significantly lowering cholesterol, as in a vegan diet, we are not only robbing boys of an essential building block for testosterone, but we are also denying girls their estrogen. Thus, a low-cholesterol society becomes a more gender-neutral society.

Low Cholesterol and the Gender-Neutralization Process

Remember the cholesterol scare? Too much cholesterol in your diet was supposed to clog up your arteries. You could die of heart failure, they said. Now, it turns out, according to a new research, that cholesterol doesn’t do any damage to your body at all, not even in very large quantities.

The original research by Professor Ancel Keys that said cholesterol was bad was a total fraud, and the author eventually even admitted it. There’s no such thing as bad cholesterol either because no cholesterol is bad. In fact, human bodies can’t do without cholesterol. It is an essential building block.

Then why did we believe cholesterol was bad for us? Because we were told. By TV. By the media. By big corporations trying to sell us seed-oil-based margarine instead of butter. (Butter contains about 215 milligrams of cholesterol per 100 grams. And we should have quit eating eggs, too. Eggs contain 373 milligrams of cholesterol per 100g.)

But cholesterol is also a building block for human sex hormones: for testosterone (especially in men) and for estrogen (more in women). In other words, by lowering cholesterol in people’s diets, we began making people less sexually dimorphic. That means men became less manly and women became less feminine. We started to revert to a gender-neutral mean.

Indeed, the movement to neutralize the human sexes into a gender-neutral species began in the USA during the 1960s (at Yale U and Berkeley). And since the initial focus was clearly on dairy foods such as butter, the initial targets were white people (who historically have been eating a dairy, eggs & meats diet, as opposed to the diet of starchy roots & sugary fruits of Central Africans, for example).

One might consider the cholesterol scam a racist attack on white well-being. And it worked. Today, 20% of U.S. kids say they identify on the LGBT spectrum. They were chemically altered by the food supply and by growing vaccine programs.

Transgenderism among kids is not, was not, and will never be a natural phenomenon. It was a subversive attack on our reproduction committed by the darkest, most vile, most insidious creatures found within our societies—crooked academics.

Are Low-Cholesterol Vegan Diets Making Kids Gay?

Why is the Dutch government actively destroying its most successful industry, the dairy and meat industry of The Netherlands? Because these foods rich in cholesterol supply a large portion of (white) Europeans with the testosterone and estrogen their peoples need in order to develop fully as men and women.

Vegan diets are not healthy, they are restrictive poverty diets. Babies, for example, reared on a strictly vegan diet, cannot survive without animal fats and proteins from the mother’s milk. A few years ago, a Belgian couple was convicted of murdering their child by dietary neglect. They denied their baby mother’s milk and otherwise only fed it a vegan diet.

But not only babies need milk, proteins, and cholesterol to grow. So do children. Boys need cholesterol in order to start synthesizing larger amounts of testosterone, so they may become muscular, tall males. And of course, in the process, their brains also heavily change, developing a knack for spatial tasks, for example, needed in hunting or nowadays in technology jobs.

Girls fed with cholesterol will synthesize the estrogens their bodies need in order to become fully female. Without it, they remain somewhat stunted and certainly do not become as fertile.

By reducing the sexual dimorphism of boys and girls, namely by denying them the cholesterol they need, men and women develop into stunted versions of their potential selves.

So, are low-cholesterol and vegan diets making kids gay and trans? That is certainly one outcome. On a low-cholesterol diet, boys simply can’t become masculine men, and girls can’t become womanly women. They revert to a more gender-neutral mean, an overall impoverished development.

Low Cholesterol and the Negroe-ization of Social Life

The whole attack on Western civilization can be summarized as follows: To change white culture into black culture. The problem is, most people are totally unaware of what these cultures really are, and how or why they are different.

At the start of the European colonial age, the Negroes of West and Central Africa had organized themselves in steep sexual hierarchies. They didn’t have normal families as we have in the West (husband, wife, children). Instead, the Negroes had polygamous systems of ‘kibbutzes’ where the alpha males got anywhere between 4 to 20 wives.

But such a social organization left a ton of single black men without wives. Stacking insult upon insult, these excess males were also considered the scum of the Earth, valueless lowlives. The excess males’ day job was to either starve themselves off, to die in tribal warfare, to be killed for food (cannibalism), to be killed in a quarrel, or to cross-dress for other men to have sexual relief.

Believe it or not, according to Pew Research, even today in the USA, African American males make up only 6 or 7% of the population, but they are 50% of the transgender men.

Later, the Arab slave trade offered a welcome change: Black men could now be sent along with the Arabs, who put the Negroe men up for sale on the markets of Northern Africa, from Morocco to Egypt. It was there that the white colonials ultimately purchased the black slaves.

(Contrary to Hollywood fiction, white Europeans didn’t go to Africa to kidnap black people with fishing nets. That never happened. The Arabs put the black men up for sale first.)

The High-Cholesterol Supremacy

To secure a future for white people, we must abandon all low-cholesterol diets, and embrace our ancestral diet of red meat, eggs, milk, butter, yogurt, and other dairy foods. And that is what the Old Testament Bible also recommends, surprisingly, because God favors the meat eaters over the greens.

Greens are for grazers, and meats are for humans.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube, Rumble

The European Council on Foreign Relations appears to be an echo of the American CFR. We learn that the United States is trying to impose its way of seeing the world onto Europeans. And we learn that Europeans are ready to make themselves independent from the USA.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

As a process, trial and error delivers results quicker and more reliably than ‘random’ evolution. Through trial and error, life on earth ould have ‘evolved’ not in billions of years but in a few thousand. However, trial and error pre-supposes the existence of a thinking mind with an intelligence and a memory. I argue that a thinking mind can come from nothing just as likely as scientists say material reality can come from nothing. But: a thinking mind from nothing can think up a mental universe far quicker and with a greater success rate than a material universe and its restrictive (self-destructive) laws and constants ever could.

Also see my book Eternal Struggle on the topic.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube

‘Soul Murder’ is when the personality you already began to develop in response to adverse childhood experiences is subsequently killed off, i.e., when your Being is denied, and you are emotionally blackmailed into pursuing a career you couldn’t care less about.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube

When you are born, you still have strings attached (the umbilical cord). But children also mentally enmesh themselves with their mothers. As puberty hits, children are supposed to individuate from their mothers and become independent, emotionally healthy people. Unless you’ve been cut loose too soon.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

I discuss the book by Richard Reeves. Feminists proclaim that machines will replace men’s muscle, and girls will replace boys in every other field. I say feminists are deluding themselves.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

I prepared a speech to signal the start of a New Age, an age of Great Works. Since the 17 SDIs (Sustainable Development Goals) of the United Nations don’t inspire anyone, we ought to think of 12 Herculean Works instead, works to be complete before the end of this century.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

Rules for Failure

People who fail in life blame everyone but themselves.
People who fail in life live in a giant Now (myopia).
People who fail in life confuse cause and effect.
People who fail in life see everything as a cost-benefit sum.
People who fail in life feel owned by their possessions.
People who fail in life seek external validations.
People who fail in life have low cognitive ability.
People who fail in life move too fast.
People who fail in life have vague goals, or none at all.
People who fail in life wait to be told what to do.
People who fail in life stop thinking too early.
People who fail in life don’t self-improve.

Rules for Success

People who succeed take responsibility.
People who succeed see things long-term.
People who succeed understand cause and effect.
People who succeed see life as an investment.
People who succeed value their internal qualities most.
People who succeed seek internal validation.
People who succeed do their own thinking.
People who succeed have patience to see the bigger picture.
People who succeed write down clear goals.
People who succeed think of next steps to undertake.
People who succeed weigh multiple solutions.
People who succeed know when to be humble.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

Inflation leads to recession, and recession leads to depression (massive unemployment). Western economies are trying to avoid doom by inflating the money supply to increase government spending, and by opening the borders to bring in more potential consumers for the economy. But both are temporary fixes that cannot solve the problem, namely that materialism has run out of steam. If we want to survive, we must return our peoples to more traditional lifestyles.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

In his own words, Ricky Gervais makes himself the butt of his jokes. He’s the silly white man who gets things wrong. But he wasn’t the first to practice self-deprecating comedy. Stars like John Cleese (Fawlty Towers) or Rowan Atkinson (Mr. Bean) preceded him. Being able to laugh at oneself is certainly a confidence-boosting trait—until it becomes anti-white racism. Has comedy that makes white men look stupid gone too far?

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

I discuss the way globalist "thinkers" want to solve inequality, namely by canceling anything good, and making everyone eat bugs.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

I discuss internal validation, how not to succumb to external addictions (such as winning praise, awards, prizes, titles from complete strangers who don’t care about you), and I show that even Arnold Schwarzenegger (Mr. Universe) fell to these addictions. In the end, internal validation is found by building internal qualities such as strength, courage, and other skills and competencies.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jmk.info

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

What do U.S. higher education fees have in common with housing pricing in The Netherlands? Both are based on projected household incomes. In other words, you pay the price of whatever loan you are expected to be able to pay back. And as incomes start to drop in a slumping economy, the West is a Ponzi scheme waiting to blow up.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

In our material cultures, we believe our problem have chemical origins and can be cured by taking material medicine: pills, powders, syrups, ointments, and chemical injections. But aren’t we neglecting the spiritual dimension of our reality? Taking testosterone supplements won’t make you a man. Facing the threat of pain, torture, and death will.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on Rumble (not available on YouTube due to censorship)

The Covid scam was both a drill to simulate possible biological warfare with China and Russia, to teach people how to behave correctly (masks and distancing), but Covid was also a cover for pushing gender-bending hormone-altering drugs onto an unknowing populace. The Covid vaccines provably irritate women’s wombs, suggesting they may need to be removed in extreme cases, so that wombs may be implanted into men who think they’re women.

Vaccines for the Gender Neutral Society (Johannes Tyrannis podcast ep. #62)https://rumble.com/v1p8au3-vaccines-for-the-gender-neutral-society-may-the-truth-be-spoken-jt-62.html

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

The material world runs on external sources of energy, such as oil, gas, nuclear, wind, or solar (and others). But there is one other kind of energy that lives within us: the internal, spiritual energy derived from a belief in God.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble.

What do women really want? It's a man with resources he is willing to donate to her. In most case: a house. The bigger, the better.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

Ladies, … and gentlemen, … supporters of the freedom movements … that have sprung up around the world … in response to undemocratic elections … and unelected officials’ reigns of terror, … our present time resembles in no way the future we dreamed of when we were children.

Have we been robbed?

Or has sheer incompetence silently crept its way up into the political system to sabotage our dreams from within, … especially … in the so-called Free World?

Who are the people … who have the power to make all of their subjects … the objects of war, … but who, at the same time, … refuse to listen … to a single one of our substantial objections?

Our pleas for peace … are dismissed … as the ramblings of ‘conspiracy theorists’.

Dare to oppose the war machine for whatever reason, … regardless of what side you find yourself on, … and you may also find yourself the target of judicial persecution … for the crime of spreading ‘disinformation’.

How, then, may we restore sanity … and accountability … to a world run by such cold, calculating, and heartless people?

Let us be clear about one thing: … The men and women casually accepting … the possibility of nuclear holocaust … as a means to achieve an end … are the real criminals, … and they will not escape the tribunals where they will have to answer …. for their blatant disregard of human dignity.

Looking back at just the past few years, … who can deny the disintegration of formerly well-functioning societies, ours?

Who can list the loss of individual freedoms … and our collective rights … without pausing to wonder … if there is still something or someone Greater … watching out for us?

We’ve lost our right to question government policy!

We’ve lost our right to disagree with what primetime media tells us to believe!

We’ve lost our right to bodily integrity!

We’ve lost our right … to free and fair elections!

In two of the most influential democracies in the world, one major election was lost … in the mail, … and another fair election … was overturned … by firing the Prime Minister after 44 days, … only to have her replaced with said election’s loser.

These are the methods of tyrants, … and of shadow governments.

And these people pulling the strings behind the scenes … still call themselves democratic, … whereas they call you a fascist for pointing out the irony.

To be called a ‘conspiracy theorist’, … at this point, … ought to be a badge of honor, … for it is evidence that we have not yet lost our minds.

Is it perhaps due to our own historic tolerance … that we have emboldened our quote-unquote leadership … to put their disdain for the plebs … on public display?

Have we been silent for too long … so that we are now being punished for speaking up?

Honestly, … I’m tired of asking all of these questions.

I want answers.

I want to know … why the profits of a military-industrial complex matter more than diplomatic solutions.

I want to know … why a politicized medical industry puts revenue before people.

And I think the answer to all such questions may be surprisingly identical, …namely, that the people ruling over us have lost touch with reality.

Our leaders, in name only, regard themselves an almost separate caste …, one that believes it may herd people around as though we were mice locked up in urban colonies.

They are wrong, for our spirits have not been crushed, … our souls have not been warped, … our eyes are still seeing, and we still have the acuity of mind to look ahead and see what’s coming.

We are wide awake. This is not the end. This is our beginning.

They say the West will fall, but its peoples shall rise again!

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

I believe 'suppressed extroverts' are extroverted people whose innate desires are suppressed by society. They form a cohort of people who will welcome the rebirth of their civilization, unleashing their pent up potential toward new music, new architecture, new paintings, and new sculptures. Let us make the Revival of the West a spiritual awakening of our peoples.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

Internet censorship has become so extreme, and primarily due to normies’ desire for unlimited power.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

ADHD Test https://psychcentral.com/quizzes/adhd-quiz

I believe people with "ADHD" are our explorers, warriors, and conquerors. But having been born in a rule-based society that isn't going anywhere anymore, people with the "disorder" aren't finding any relief from the boredom. It's time to make life more exciting.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

The grandson of Charles Darwin, by the same name, predicted in his book The Next Million Years that ‘humanity’ (or whatever we mutate into) shall have to live off of wind and solar. But are wind and solar truly revolutionary developments, or are they Western business pivots? Having lost control of colonial supplies of oil and gas, Western nations have been forced to look for alternatives. The climate change ‘scare’ is a marketing stunt to force people to switch to electric from wind, gas, and water controlled by Western elites.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

Western people condemn the colonization of Africa in the past, but at the same time, the same Western people also support today’s repeated attempt to colonize Russia. Unlike Africa, Russia always had an army. Napoleon’s army failed to capture Moscow and was sent home with heavy losses. Hitler’s army failed to capture Leningrad/Stalingrad and was sent home with heavy losses. Now, it seems, the West is gearing up for a third attempt to colonize Russia for its resource and its geographic power. Why is it so hard for Western people to see they have been, and still are, behaving as the ‘bad guy’? I offer a third alternative to establish global peace: a revival of the idea of a Holy Roman Empire as a bulwark against both the powers of the Atlantic and of the Heartland.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube, or Rumble

Overcoming the fear of pain, torture, and death enables one to live a heroic life. Rather than seeing life as a road with death as its end, we see death as our first conscious birth. Here, we accelerate instead of hitting the breaks. Instead of crashing into that wall, we veer of into eternity.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble.

It is better to lose a few friends who aren't supportive of who you're trying to be than to hold on.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube or Rumble

We are back in the day of Otto von Bismarck. Will Europe choose to ally itself with the former British Empire in order to crush Russia and isolate China? Will Europe seek diplomatic relations with Russia in order to withstand the Anglo? Perhaps Europe will, at long last, choose its own path, and rule the world.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube, Rumble

In a culture of weak fathers, Hollywood screenwriters have been awarded the dangerous power to design boys' role models. We have to take back the culture.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

In this personal video, I detail the suicide attempts and half-attempts I underwent as a teenager, and how I eventually managed to save myself when no one else would.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

One can heal the consequences of physical and psychological abuse by collecting new but positive memories, and so building a cushion of positive memories to fall back on.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

Being told to shut up, keep quiet, or not to "make those sounds coming from your mouth" at an early age, by alcoholic or narcissistic parents, may have set you up for a life of silence. I discuss healing from adult selective mutism.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

Abusive parents may not want their children to grow up and become independent because they have other things in mind for their child-slaves.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

I conclude that you may excel in a way that will make your former abusers regret that they didn't treat you better.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

I talk about how to escape this form of parentification, by standing up for yourself and refusing to go along with the unhealthy role reversal.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

A modern-day narcissist is often a low-ranking individual who expects the world to worship them.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

Narcissistic abuse put me on a track to try to win my abusers' appreciation, doing all sorts of work and studies I personally never cared about. Allowing myself to disconnect from this false conditioning, I began living my own life.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

A scapegoat child is blamed for everything that is wrong with its parents. And this child may also be the only one to break the cycle of narcissistic abuse.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

Imagine having to parent your parents. You will be robbed of a childhood. You'll learn to inhibit spontaneity. Letting go is the answer.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

Abusive people are mostly interested in promoting or defending their (perceived) social standing, yet they may not actually carry any social significance. Their anxiety stems from paranoia.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

Often, psychologists will tell people to "learn to forgive" their parents as part of a healing process. But no healing can take place if abusive parents have not even begun to show the first signs of repentance for their crimes. I conclude it is wrong to forgive and forget. Instead, break contact.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

View Details

Watch on YouTube

Narcissistic parents may be acutely aware of their social value. Usually, though, their value is very low, since they aren't going to do the effort to improve it. But they expect others, including their children, to give them validation.

Get full access to The Great Johannes at www.jmk.info/subscribe

The Great Johannes Podcast: Recent Episodes

Johannes Mathijs Koenraadt