Lectures on Philippine Labor Law and Jurisprudence. Paulino Ungos III is a lawyer, law professor, and co-author of Labor Law books published by Rex Bookstore.
Mariano v. G.V. Florida Transport, G.R. No. 240882, 16 September 2020.
Tuppil, Jr. v. LBP Service Corp., G.R. No. 228407, 10 June 2020.
Verizon Communications Philippines, Inc. v. Margin, G.R. No. 216599, September 16, 2020.
U R Employed International Corp. v. Pinmiliw, G.R. No. 225263, March 16, 2022.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/paulinoungosiii/message
Trans-Global Maritime Agency, Inc. v. Utanes, G.R. No. 236498, September 16, 2020.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/paulinoungosiii/message
Fil-Expat Placement Agency, Inc. v. Lee, G.R. No. 250439, September 22, 2020.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/paulinoungosiii/message
Manrique v. Delta Earthmoving, Inc., G.R. No. 229429, November 9, 2020.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/paulinoungosiii/message
Conjusta v. PPI Holdings, Inc., G.R. No. 252720, August 22, 2022
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/paulinoungosiii/message
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/paulinoungosiii/message
Abelardo lost the case filed against him before the Office of the Labor Arbiter and was declared the employer of the complainants. Was his appeal before the National Labor Relations Commission perfected? Was he confirmed to be the employer of the complainants?
Salazar v. Simbajon, G.R. No. 202374, June 30, 2021.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/paulinoungosiii/message
Learn whether this employee was granted his claims of overtime pay and premium pay for holidays and rest days.
Zonio v. 1st Quantum Leap Security Agency, Inc., G.R. No. 224944, May 5, 2021.
SRL International Manpower Agency v. Yarza, Jr., G.R. No. 207828, February 14, 2022.
Spouses Maynes v. Oreiro, G.R. No. 206109, November 25, 2020.
Gesolgon v. CyberOne PH., Inc., G.R. No. 210741, October 14, 2020.
G & S Transport Corp. v. Medina, G.R. No. 243768, September 5, 2022.
Angono Medics Hospital, Inc. v. Agabin, G.R. No. 202542, December 9, 2020.
Santos, Jr. v. King Chef, G.R. No. 211073, November 25, 2020.
Pacific Royal Basic Foods, Inc. v. Noche, G.R. No. 202392, October 4, 2021.
Dela Torre v. Twinstar Professional Protective Services, Inc., G.R. No. 222992, June 23, 2021.
In this case, find out why an illegal dismissal complaint cannot be classified like an ordinary civil action insofar as the effect of death of any of the parties is concerned.
Nedira v. NJ World Corp., G.R. No. 240005, December 6, 2022.
Cabatan v. Southeast Asia Shipping Corp., G.R. No. 219495, February 28, 2022.
Ginta-Ason v. J.T.A. Packaging Corp., G.R. No. 244206, March 16, 2022.
In this case, the Supreme Court held that when the status of the employment is in dispute, the employer bears the burden to prove that the workers are independent contractors rather than regular employees.
Ditiangkin, et al. v. Lazada, et al., G.R. No. 246892, September 21, 2022.
Reyes v. Rural Bank of San Rafael (Bulacan), Inc., G.R. No. 230597, March 23, 2022.
The employer asserted that its business was slowing down and that it dismissed the complainant on the ground of redundancy. Was the complainant’s dismissal found valid? Teletech Customer Care Management Philippines, Inc. v. Gerona, Jr., G.R. No. 219166, November 10, 2021.
Bus drivers and conductors filed a complaint against their employer for money claims before the Office of the Labor Arbiter and alleged that the latter failed to comply with Department Order No. 118, Series of 2012. Does the Office of the Labor Arbiter have jurisdiction over the case?
Del Monte Land Transport Bus, Co. v. Armenta, G.R. No. 240144, February 3, 2021.
The accused pointed out that the POEA certification (which the trial court relied on in convicting him of the crime of illegal recruitment in large scale) was not authenticated in court by its signatory. Was this sufficient to overturn his conviction for the crime?
People v. Bautista, G.R. No. 218582, September 3, 2020.
The redundancy program was found to be valid and the employer was not found to have committed unfair labor practice. Learn why the employer was still held liable for separation pay and backwages for the dismissed employees.
San Fernando Coca-Cola Rank-and-File Union v. Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 200499, October 4, 2017.
The instructor in this case claimed to have completed her probationary period. Learn why the Court did not consider her as a permanent employee.
Palgan v. Holy Name University, G.R. No. 219916, February 10, 2021.
Why was the dismissal of this employee declared to be illegal despite proof of her violation of company policy?
Lamadrid v. Cathay Pacific Airways Limited, G.R. No. 200658, June 23, 2021.
The employer in this case concluded that the employee, who went on an unapproved leave of absence, had already abandoned his employment. Was the employer correct?
Gososo v. Leyte Lumber Yard and Hardware, Inc., G.R. No. 205257, January 13, 2021.
Upon being informed that they will be dismissed from employment, the employees tendered their resignation. Will an assertion of involuntariness in their resignation have merit?
Bance v. University of St. Anthony, G.R. No. 202724, February 3, 2021.
Why was constructive dismissal not declared by the Supreme Court in this case?
Dela Torre v. Twinstar Professional Protective Services, Inc., G.R. No. 222992, June 23, 2021.
Illegal Dismissal was not among the causes of action at issue in the employee's complaint filed before the NLRC. Will the labor tribunals be precluded from resolving such issue?
Burnea v. Security Trading Corp., G.R. No. 231038, April 26, 2021.
Can the employer in this case refuse to implement its Local Policy which provides for minimum salary rates to regularized employees?
Del Monte Fresh Produce (Philippines), Inc. v. Del Monte Fresh Supervisors Union, G.R. No. 225115, January 27, 2020.
With regard to the visitorial and enforcement power under Article 128 of the Labor Code of the Philippines, does the Department of Labor and Employment have authority to accept an appeal under a reduced bond?
Blazing Star Security and Investigation Agency, Inc. v. Miraflor, G.R. No. 196022, January 22, 2020.
In justifying its decision to dismiss the employee, the employer claimed that the employee posed a clear and existing danger to the safety of the crew or vessel. Was this claim proven?
Evic Human Resource Management, Inc. v. Panahon, G.R. No. 206890, July 31, 2017.
Does the control test call for the actual exercise of the right to control the manner by which a person does his work?
Parayday v. Shogun Shipping Co., Inc., G.R. No. 204555, July 6, 2020.
Can an employer’s service contract with another company prove an employee’s project employment status?
Jovero v. Cerio, G.R. No. 202466, June 23, 2021.
Learn whether the car plan provided by the employer had ripened into company practice.
Home Credit Mutual Building and Loan Association v. Prudente, G.R. No. 200010, August 27, 2020.
Learn why the Supreme Court still awarded permanent total disability benefits despite the employer's claim that the seafarer was informed of his disability rating.
Abella v. Abosta Shipmanagement Corp., G.R. No. 249358, April 28, 2021.
Find out why the SC ruled the dismissal of the employer’s appeal to be erroneous despite the showing of a failure to post an appeal bond.
Karj Global Marketing Network, Inc. v. Mara, G.R. No. 190654, July 28, 2020.
The third doctor in this case declared the claimant’s unfitness to work as a seafarer. Should the claimant be granted total permanent disability benefits?
Pacific Ocean Manning, Inc. v. Castillo, G.R. No. 230527, June 14, 2021.
Find out how this employee successfully claimed retirement benefits despite the employer’s lack of a written retirement plan.
Beltran v. AMA Computer College-Biñan, G.R. No. 223795, April 3, 2019.
The employee was not found to have committed insubordination and gross and habitual neglect of duty. Find out why her dismissal was still ruled to be with valid cause.
Villanueva v. Ganco Resort and Recreation, Inc., G.R. No. 227175, January 8, 2020.
In supporting its assertion of legitimate contracting, the principal alleged that the complainant only performed non-core functions of its business. Was this assertion upheld by the Supreme Court?
Daguinod v. Southgate Foods, Inc., G.R. No. 227795, February 20, 2019.
The employee in this case contended that his dismissal was illegal for being based on a vague company rule. Did the Supreme Court agree?
De Leon v. Philippine Transmarine Carriers, Inc., G.R. No. 232194, June 19, 2019.
Learn why this manning agency was not held liable for the seafarer’s claims despite having executed an Affidavit of Assumption of Responsibility.
Orlanes v. Stella Marris Shipmanagement, Inc., G.R. No. 247702, June 14, 2021.
Learn why the Supreme Court in this case rejected the employer’s contention that supervening events prevented it from reinstating its employee.
Consolidated Distillers of the Far East, Inc. v. Zaragoza, G.R. No. 229302, June 20, 2018.
In a case, the Supreme Court reiterated the principles relating to the powers of the Secretary of the Department of Labor and Employment in national interest disputes, including the related principle on the significance of maintaining the status quo.
Albay Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ALECO Labor Employees Organization, G.R. No. 241437, September 14, 2020.
In a case, the Supreme Court reiterated the mandatory requirements for a valid strike.
Bigg’s, Inc. v. Boncacas, G.R. Nos. 200487 & 200636, March 6, 2019.
Learn why the Supreme Court refused to accept the employer's assertion that the seafarer failed to follow the third doctor referral procedure under the POEA SEC.
United Philippine Lines, Inc. v. Ramos, G.R. No. 225171, March 18, 2021.
The respondent in a complaint for illegal dismissal pointed out that a different person was the employer of the complainant. Did the Supreme Court uphold respondent’s claim?
Fernandez v. Kalookan Slaughterhouse, Inc., G.R. No. 225075, June 19, 2019.
The employee alleged that his employer asked for his resignation. Will this be enough to declare the illegality of his dismissal from employment?
Jarabelo v. Household Goods Patrons, Inc., G.R. No. 223163, December 2, 2020.
Find out why this employee was declared to have been illegally dismissed from employment even when witnesses of the employer testified to the employee’s violation of company rules.
Bautista v. Eli Lilly Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 235865, February 3, 2021.
Can an employer’s general return-to-work order be a defense against a claim of constructive dismissal?
Seventh Fleet Security Services, Inc. v. Loque, G.R. No. 230005, January 22, 2020.
Learn the requirements for validly placing an employee on floating status.
Airborne Maintenance and Allied Services, Inc. v. Egos, G.R. No. 222748, April 3, 2019.
The employer is charged with the burden of proving that its conduct and action are for valid and legitimate grounds and that the transfer is not unreasonable, inconvenient or prejudicial to the employee. If the employer cannot overcome this burden of proof, the employee’s transfer shall be tantamount to constructive dismissal.
Ebus v. The Results Co., Inc., G.R. No. 244388, March 3, 2021.
Find out why the Supreme Court declared the illegality of the employee’s dismissal from employment despite the employer’s notice to the DOLE and the employee.
Acosta v. Matiere SAS, G.R. No. 232870, June 3, 2019.
Although employers have the inherent right to discipline their employees, the penalties imposed must be commensurate to the infractions committed. Dismissal of employees for minor and negligible offenses may be considered as illegal dismissal.
Malcaba v. ProHealth Pharma Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 209085 , June 6, 2018.
Find out why the Supreme Court declared the illegality of the employee’s dismissal even if the employer’s business was adversely affected by the 2008 global financial crisis.
Team Pacific Corp. v. Parente, G.R. No. 206789, July 15, 2020.
Whether an expletive constitutes serious misconduct that warrants a dismissal from employment will depend on the context of the phrase’s use.
Adamson University Faculty and Employees Union v. Adamson University, G.R. No. 227070, March 9, 2020.
The Supreme Court stressed that in resolving issues of constructive dismissal, one does not only weigh the evidence presented by the parties, but also delve into the totality of circumstances in a case.
Jacob v. First Step Manpower Int’l. Services, Inc., G.R. No. 229984, July 8, 2020.
Find out why an employer was still held liable for constructive dismissal even if it had no hand in the sexual harassment committed by its supervisor.
LBC Express-Vis, Inc. v. Palco, G.R. No. 217101, February 12, 2020.
When an illegally dismissed employee is reinstated, should he be considered a new hire?
Cuadra v. San Miguel Corp., G.R. No. 194467, July 13, 2020.