Amicus: A Law Review: Recent Episodes
James Santelle
Jim Santelle, a former United States Attorney in Wisconsin and Justice Department official in Washington, is among Civic Media’s resident legal commentators and frequent on-air analysts. Join Jim each Saturday morning from 9 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. for “Amicus: A Law Review,” as current events meet civics understanding—through in-depth analysis and discussion (including your listener calls) of the most recent developments in the areas of law, government, courts, and the aspiration for justice. Listen Live: 9:00 am - 11:00 am Saturday
In the final installment of his four-part series on the U.S. Supreme Court's 2025–2026 term, Jim Santelle examines the Court's most consequential rulings on elections and voting rights. He recaps key statistics from the term before diving into major decisions involving mail-in ballots, campaign finance, and the landmark Louisiana v. Callais ruling, which reshapes how race can be considered in congressional redistricting. Santelle explains how the decision builds on earlier Voting Rights Act cases, explores its nationwide impact on gerrymandering and future elections, and discusses what these changes could mean for voters heading into the 2026 midterms and beyond. The episode concludes the Court review series before Amicus: A Law Review returns to its weekly analysis of current legal and constitutional issues.
In this episode of Amicus: A Law Review, host Jim Santelle continues his summer series examining the most significant U.S. Supreme Court decisions from the 2025–2026 term. This week, the focus turns to the Second Amendment and the evolving constitutional landscape surrounding gun rights in America. Drawing from landmark cases such as District of Columbia v. Heller and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, Jim explains how the Court's interpretation of the right to keep and bear arms has changed over time and how those decisions continue to shape modern firearms law.
The episode also explores the Court's newest rulings involving firearm possession by marijuana users, concealed carry restrictions on private property, domestic violence restraining orders, and regulations on ghost guns. Jim breaks down what these decisions mean for gun owners, lawmakers, and the courts while previewing a major case the Supreme Court will hear next term on state bans of semiautomatic rifles. Whether you're interested in constitutional law, public policy, or the future of the Second Amendment, this episode provides the historical context and legal analysis needed to understand one of the nation's most debated constitutional rights.
Federal district court judges are making waves! Jim Santelle dissects Judge Dudek's fiery rebuke of the DOJ's mishandling of an immigrant's right to due process, leading to the detainee's release. Judge Sorokin's takedown of a $100,000 visa fee for skilled workers as an illegal tax showcases judicial pushback against executive overreach. Judge Bosberg denies DOJ's request to erase a ruling that exposed their harassment of Jerome Powell. Meanwhile, the Kennedy Center removes Trump's name, sparking legal and financial fallout. The Supreme Court faces pivotal cases on gun rights, immigration, and presidential power. Justice is alive and kicking!
In a captivating two-hour finale of Amicus, Jim Santelle dissects the judicial pulse of America, spotlighting federal district courts as bulwarks against executive overreach. From Judge Brinkma's demand for clarity on a controversial anti-weaponization fund to Judge Kelly's stand against historical censorship in national parks, judges are calling the shots. Santelle scrutinizes pivotal Supreme Court cases on gun rights, deportation, and presidential powers, amidst a looming 23-case backlog. As the show transitions from live to digital, Santelle champions civic engagement, ensuring justice remains a collective endeavor. Stay tuned for more legal enlightenment!
The Supreme Court is in high gear, clearing Alabama to redraw its congressional map, slashing a majority-black district, signaling a restrictive future for voting rights. Regulatory bodies like the SEC and FCC score major wins, affirming their enforcement powers. Meanwhile, the President’s grand ballroom plans hit a skeptical appeals court. Federal district courts are busy, too—halting Trump's asylum restrictions and SNAP fund conditions. In criminal news, John Bolton prepares to plead guilty over classified info, while James Comey’s bizarre prosecution over seashells sees a lead prosecutor bowing out. Lastly, the SPLC faces renewed legal fire but strikes back with claims of prosecutorial misconduct.
This episode dives into the legal chaos surrounding President Trump's controversial $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund, halted by a federal judge for potential constitutional breaches. Jim Santelle explores the fallout from this fund, including its questionable legality and the reopening of a dismissed $10 billion lawsuit involving Trump's tax records. Also on the docket: the DOJ's dubious criminal probe into E. Jean Carroll, raising alarms of retaliatory justice. Meanwhile, in Chicago, prosecutorial misconduct leads to dropped charges against protesters, as a judge slams the DOJ's grand jury manipulations. The Supreme Court rules to uphold racial fairness in jury selection and curtails free speech rights for immigration judges. The episode wraps with a federal judge's directive to remove Trump's name from the Kennedy Center, underscoring judicial resistance to executive overreach.
Jim Santelle delves into the legal mayhem surrounding the establishment of a controversial $1.8 billion Weaponization Reimbursement Fund by the Trump administration. This unauthorized fund, allegedly compensating victims of 'lawfare' and government weaponization, raises eyebrows as it's carved from the Judgment Fund, a congressional creation meant for litigation judgments. Santelle critiques the fund's dubious legality, highlighting its potential misuse to benefit Trump allies, including January 6th insurrectionists. The episode also covers the Supreme Court's cautious stance on death penalty cases involving intellectual disabilities and a case on Cuban property claims post-nationalization. Meanwhile, federal judges reject DOJ's push for state voter rolls, marking a victory for state privacy laws.
This episode dives into unexpected twists in criminal cases across America. Jim Santelle reviews the South Carolina Supreme Court's reversal of Alex Murdoch's murder convictions due to jury interference, a mistrial declared in Harvey Weinstein's rape case in Manhattan, and the commutation of sentence for Colorado election denier Tina Peters. The podcast also covers a dropped fraud case against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, raising ethical concerns. The episode transitions to civil matters, addressing the DOJ's accusations against Yale for discriminatory admissions, an SEC settlement with Elon Musk, and a Supreme Court ruling on subpoena challenges.
This episode dives into recent legal battles shaping America's political landscape. The Supreme Court's decision in Louisiana vs. Callais has ignited redistricting wars, allowing states like Tennessee to redraw congressional maps, potentially disenfranchising minority voters. Meanwhile, Virginia's Supreme Court struck down a Democratic referendum on procedural grounds, highlighting the ongoing tug-of-war over partisan gerrymandering. In a legal twist, the Court of International Trade ruled against the president's tariff attempts, questioning executive overreach. Abortion rights resurface as Mifepristone faces scrutiny, with the Supreme Court temporarily halting restrictions. Federal judges, from Manhattan to Rhode Island, are taking bold stands against executive actions, reinforcing constitutional boundaries and protecting civil liberties.
Jim Santelle dives into the Supreme Court's landmark decision in the Callais case, which reshapes the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Court's ruling diminishes Section 2, demanding proof of intentional racial discrimination for gerrymandering claims, empowering states to redraw districts without federal oversight unless blatant racial bias is shown. Santelle reviews historical strides in voting rights, from the 1960s civil rights movement to recent court cases like Shelby County and Bernovich, underscoring how the decision opens doors for partisan gerrymandering. The episode explores the potential political scramble across states and the legislative fixes Congress could enact to restore voter protections.
Host Jim Santelle delves into the tumultuous world of justice and politics, dissecting investigations of political figures like John Brennan and Jerome Powell, which raise eyebrows for their seemingly partisan motives. Santelle critiques the Department of Justice's handling and misuse of subpoenas, highlighting the troubling trend of investigations serving as punishment. The episode shifts focus to legitimate prosecutions like the gun supplier in the Shreveport shooting and singer David Burke's (d4vd) murder charges, underscoring the role of deterrence. Santelle also tackles DOJ's controversial denaturalization moves and the revival of the death penalty, while Supreme Court cases on environmental and LGBTQIA rights add further complexity to the justice landscape.
This episode of Amicus dives into pivotal legal happenings shaping America and beyond. The U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of oil companies, allowing them to move environmental lawsuits from state to federal courts, spotlighting corporate influence in environmental justice. Meanwhile, a New York jury brands Live Nation a monopoly, igniting antitrust debates. Abroad, a French court finds cement giant Lafarge guilty of financing terrorism, a landmark ruling on corporate responsibility. Back home, federal judges block Trump's White House ballroom plans and dismiss his defamation suit against the Wall Street Journal, highlighting judiciary checks on presidential actions. Plus, tensions flare at the Supreme Court as Justice Sotomayor apologizes for critiquing Justice Kavanaugh.
Todd Blanche steps into his role as Acting Attorney General amidst a storm of controversies and policy shifts. Asserting DOJ's allegiance to President Trump, Blanche inherits a slew of legal quagmires, including the politically charged investigation into Cassidy Hutchinson and the rescission of civil rights settlements for transgender students. The DOJ's credibility takes a hit with repeated court misrepresentations, while federal judges push back against executive overreach, from immigration crackdowns to media muzzling. Meanwhile, the NFL faces scrutiny under antitrust laws, and former Trump aide Steve Bannon's conviction faces a potential reversal.
The U.S. Supreme Court took center stage this week, striking down Colorado's ban on conversion therapy, citing free speech concerns, while skepticism loomed large over President Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship. Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized that the Constitution remains unchanged despite modern issues like birth tourism. Simultaneously, drama unfolded at the Department of Justice as Attorney General Pam Bondi was ousted, with Todd Blanche stepping in as acting AG. Back in Wisconsin, ICE detained the president of the state's largest mosque, igniting debates on immigration policy and civil liberties. Legal and political battles rage on.
The episode dives into a whirlwind of legal battles and courtroom decisions. A California jury holds Meta and YouTube liable for harming a young user with addictive features, marking a landmark case in tech liability. Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rules that Cox Communications isn't responsible for piracy by its users, raising questions on internet providers' roles. The Wisconsin Supreme Court mandates Miranda rights for students interrogated at school, shedding light on minors' rights. A pivotal case looms at the U.S. Supreme Court, potentially reshaping how late ballots are counted, challenging the definition of Election Day.
In this episode, Jim Santelle tackles the crucial role of federal district courts in upholding the rule of law, highlighting recent cases where judges blocked Trump administration actions on vaccines, press restrictions, and governance at the Kennedy Center. The episode also delves into Trump's lawsuit against Harvard and a civil suit by former FBI agents alleging political retribution. Supreme Court cases on birthright citizenship and election laws are on the horizon. Special guest Kristin Hansen from Blue Sky Waukesha joins to discuss Wisconsin's upcoming elections, the importance of informed voting, and the potential threat posed by the SAVE Act.
Guest: Kristin Hansen
Jim Santelle dives into the tumultuous legal landscape, spotlighting grand jury subpoenas and their pivotal role in DOJ investigations. Highlighting figures like Jerome Powell and Letitia James, he scrutinizes politically charged probes deemed baseless by federal judges. The episode unravels the chaos surrounding 120-day interim U.S. Attorney appointments and their legal pitfalls. Santelle critiques the DOJ's controversial attempts to usurp state bar oversight, and the unsettling 'friendly adversaries' tactic reshaping state laws without legislative input. The Supreme Court's shadow docket debate, featuring Justices Kavanaugh and Jackson, ties into plummeting public confidence in the Court's integrity.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
This episode of Amicus dives into the tumultuous state of the U.S. judicial and legal systems, highlighting recent Supreme Court actions and lower court controversies. It covers the Supreme Court's handling of Second Amendment rights in the context of drug use, particularly marijuana, and its implications for gun ownership. The Court's shadow docket decisions, including those affecting congressional maps and transgender student policies, reveal its growing influence over state and federal issues. The episode also discusses explosive courtroom clashes, such as Minnesota and New Jersey judges threatening contempt against federal agencies for non-compliance, and the Department of Justice's internal struggles with lawyer misconduct and political entanglement.
Dive into a whirlwind of legal intrigue with Jim Santelle as he navigates the latest from the U.S. Supreme Court and beyond. The high court tackles the Takings Clause in Pung v. Isabella County, questions the Postal Service's immunity in Conan, and examines courtroom tactics in Villarreal v. Texas. Meanwhile, Judge Brian Murphy slams Trump's 'third-country' deportations in Massachusetts, while Judge Eileen Cannon stirs controversy in Florida over Jack Smith's report on Trump's classified docs. Add in FBI raids in California and DOJ's Epstein file missteps, and you've got a legal storm worth dissecting!
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
The Supreme Court delivers a major blow to presidential powers, ruling 6-3 against Trump's sweeping tariffs on imports, citing constitutional overreach. The court's decision emphasizes Congress's role in taxation, with Neil Gorsuch extolling legislative process virtues. Trump lashes out at the justices, calling them 'fools' and 'lap dogs,' highlighting a growing tension between branches. Meanwhile, cases like birthright citizenship and election laws loom large on the court's docket. Internationally, South Korea's ex-president receives a life sentence for insurrection, and France's Giselle Pelicote inspires with her fight against sexual violence. A First Amendment win in Wisconsin reminds us of the enduring power of free speech.
In a chaotic congressional hearing, Attorney General Pam Bondi faced intense scrutiny and criticism for her unprofessional demeanor and evasive answers before the House Judiciary Committee. Her testimony, marked by confrontations with US Representatives like Jamie Raskin and Ted Lieu, highlighted issues of competence and decorum. Despite the focus on the Epstein case and allegations of Department of Justice politicization, Bondi's performance was criticized for lacking transparency, compassion, and basic legal skills. Meanwhile, federal courts showed resilience, with judges upholding constitutional safeguards and rejecting the administration's overreach in several cases. Public advocacy and engagement remain vital amid these challenges.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Jim Santelle delivers a fiery review of the week's legal battles, spotlighting the chaos within the Department of Justice and the federal courts' role in upholding the rule of law. The Supreme Court's stance on gerrymandering in Texas and California reveals partisan maneuverings, while federal judges tackle cases ranging from ICE detentions to climate change law violations. The DOJ faces scrutiny for incompetence, with insiders like Ed Martin under fire. Notably, a judge orders the release of detained immigrants, invoking the Declaration of Independence to critique government overreach. Amidst it all, the judiciary remains a bulwark against executive excesses.
Host Jim Santelle delves into the legal turmoil enveloping Minneapolis. The U.S. Department of Justice, under Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, reverses its stance to investigate the murder of Alex Pretti by ICE agents, igniting debates on civil rights and federal overreach. Chief Judge Patrick Schultz lambasts the DOJ for its unprecedented move to overturn a magistrate's decision on arrest warrants, spotlighting judicial defiance against executive misconduct. Meanwhile, Judge Katherine Menendez grapples with the legality of the Trump administration's Operation Metro Surge, questioning ulterior motives amid allegations of political retribution. As the federal courts drown in cases, the episode highlights the judiciary's role as the last bastion of constitutional integrity.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Amicus dives into two Supreme Court oral arguments: a Second Amendment case from Hawaii challenging property rights versus gun rights, and a high-stakes battle over presidential powers to dismiss Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. The Court seems poised to uphold property rights and protect Federal Reserve independence, signaling skepticism towards Trump's attempts to fire Cook without clear cause. Meanwhile, special counsel Jack Smith defends his prosecutions of Donald Trump, asserting evidence of criminality despite political backlash. In First Amendment news, a federal judge halts FBI access to materials seized from a Washington Post reporter, raising constitutional concerns over press freedom.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
This week's legal landscape is a whirlwind of judicial power and constitutional debates. In Minneapolis, a federal judge clamps down on ICE agents' overreach, stirring lawsuits and resignations as the DOJ eyes criminal probes against local leaders. The Insurrection Act rears its head, only for Trump to backtrack amid backlash. Meanwhile, in Virginia, turmoil ensues over a U.S. attorney's legitimacy, leading to a prosecutor's firing. All eyes are on the Supreme Court as it grapples with the contentious issue of transgender athletes in women's sports, hinting at support for state bans, with implications rippling nationwide.
Host Jim Santelle dives into the legal maelstrom sparked by the U.S. apprehension of Venezuela's Nicolas Maduro, dissecting international law and presidential power. The episode scrutinizes America's controversial military role in Venezuela, echoing past actions in Panama. Shifting gears, it explores the tragic ICE shooting of Renee Good in Minneapolis, examining constitutional standards for law enforcement's use of force. Amidst public outcry and federal oversight controversies, Santelle unpacks legal doctrines and potential remedies. The episode also touches on Supreme Court activities and decisions affecting federal policies and landmark cases.
In the early hours of Saturday, January 3, the US military conducted bombings on Caracos, Venezuela with their current President, Nicolás Maduro along with his wife being captured and brought to The United States. James breaks down the events, as well as their legal ramifications. Along with this breaking story, James also gives an overview of other major stories coming out of the world of law.
James breaks down the timeline of the events from today, as well as the aftermath including commentary from members of Trump Administration and Congress, He also talks about the justifications used by The White House for capturing the Venezuelan President, bringing him to this country. Jim discusses the implications on American and International law.
In other major news, James discusses news regarding the National Guard troops in major cities and a shocking announcement from President Trump about troop placement in three major cities.
In the second hour, James discusses the year end report from The Chief Justice of The United States Supreme Court. He gives a history of this yearly release and what some feel are missing in this document. We also hear from President Trump regarding the attacks on Venezuela, indicating that The United States will "Run The Country" until further notice, which Jim says is the definition of an occupation. He then wraps up the show talking about the explosive deposition of Jack Smith.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Jim Santelle delves into a whirlwind of judicial decisions and looming legal battles as 2025 closes. He critiques the prosecutorial discretion in Wisconsin Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan's conviction and explores the intricacies of prosecutorial decision-making. The episode highlights a dramatic Supreme Court ruling barring Trump from deploying the National Guard in Chicago, emphasizing constraints on executive power. Santelle underscores the incompetence of the Department of Justice in handling deportations, spotlighting Judge Bosberg's insistence on due process for Venezuelans. Finally, Santelle highlights various federal court rulings, from FEMA funding to mental health grants and gender care, painting a vivid picture of the American legal landscape.
Jim starts the show with his opening statement, a review of everything he will be covering on today's episode, including the verdict in the case against Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan. He also discusses his thoughts on the impact of criminal prosecution and the ability to hold two opinions on the same topic.
In the matter of Judge Dugan, Jim talks about the word "deterrence" and its use in the courtroom, as well as a refresher on the First Amendment, specifically what it does and does not protect. He then reviews the highlights of the trial including who was called to the stand as well as thoughts from the presiding judge.
What happens next after the Dugan verdict? Jim goes into the necessary steps and what a judge can do utilizing case law from a tragic event in the history of Hip Hop (RIP Jam Master Jay). The question of "Can Governor Evers commute her sentence?" and Jim goes over the answer to that inquiry. When it comes to what the sentence could be, we get a preview of that process and how much power the judge has in the matter.
Jim wraps up the overview of Judge Dugan's case with some of his personal thoughts on the matter and reminds us that while our justice system seems imperfect at times, we have the opportunities to make it better. He then gives a brief rundown of what The US Supreme Court is reviewing and how two cases have roots right here in Wisconsin.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
This episode dives into the Supreme Court's latest oral arguments, tackling presidential powers, campaign finance, and the death penalty. First, the court considers overturning a 90-year precedent that limits presidential authority to fire members of independent agencies, potentially granting unprecedented executive power. Next, campaign finance rules are questioned, as the GOP challenges limits on party contributions to candidates, a decision with major implications for the 2026 elections. Finally, a death penalty case from Alabama tests the court's stance on mental disability assessments. Meanwhile, lower court judges scrutinize DOJ's handling of controversial deportations, highlighting ongoing legal battles for justice.
This episode delves into the labyrinth of justice, exploring the unchecked power of presidential pardons and their implications. Jim Santelle scrutinizes recent controversial pardons, including that of Juan Orlando Hernandez, convicted for massive drug trafficking, juxtaposed against the U.S. military's aggressive actions against alleged drug-running Venezuelan boats. Jim also dissects major Supreme Court actions, including the acceptance of a case on birthright citizenship and a pivotal decision on Texas's racial gerrymandering, both revealing the Court's trajectory on crucial rule of law issues. The grand jury's independence is highlighted with its refusal to re-indict Letitia James, showcasing democracy's checks and balances.
This week's legal landscape is ablaze with a federal judge dismissing major prosecutions against James Comey and Letitia James due to improper U.S. attorney appointments, sparking chaos in Virginia's U.S. attorney's office and a promised appeal. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court stirs the pot with a Texas gerrymandering case, as Justice Alito suspends a ruling against racially biased district maps, setting the stage for another landmark decision. Elsewhere, North Carolina's partisan map survives judicial scrutiny, while Trump faces civil setbacks with the Eleventh Circuit upholding sanctions in frivolous lawsuits against CNN and others.
In the immediate aftermath of what had to be among the most stunning series of revelations of the incompetence, the depravity, the recklessness, and the hubris of the Justice Department, this week's installment of "Amicus: A Law Review" focuses dramatic attention on three hearings in the conduct of the prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey: Beginning with a reminder of the gobsmacking question posed by a federal judge about the legal authority of Eastern Virginia United States Attorney Lindsay Halligan to initiate and prosecute the case at all.
Then, we review in detail the even more shocking revelations in the courtrooms of a federal magistrate judge and a trial court judge--not only confirming wild misstatements of the law by the prosecutor to the indicting grand jury but also reflecting the breach of the attorney-client relationship in the disclosure by an investigating agent of material information before that same reviewing body. As if that isn't enough, the broadcast also includes explanations of just why these legal errors, procedural bunglings, and constitutional gaffes (including an admission that the full grand jury never saw the final charging document) now mandate the outright dismissal of the case--with prejudice.
Attention to the internal "clown car" that IS the Justice Department (from which some 5500 employees have departed in the past 10 months) continues with reporting on the curious but likely well-founded internal investigation of exactly what two senior aides have been up to in attempting (unsuccessfully) to gin up mortgage fraud-related and other criminal cases against more of the President's self-identified adversaries, including New York Attorney General Letitia James—and California Senator Adam Schiff. Finally in this category of prosecution reviews, the broadcast updates listeners on the status of the third of these cases, charging former National Security Advisory John Bolton if disclosing classified and secret information.
In the open file of other past and unmistakable violations of the law by this Administration, the broadcast then offers the latest insight into the continuing attention of a District of Columbia judge committed to the pursuit of truth in connection with that overtly unconstitutional transport of some 238 migrants to El Salvador last Match--and on the parallel work of a Maryland judge still struggling to deliver justice for Kilmar Abrego Garcia as he moves in and among the civil immigration and criminal prosecution tendrils of a Homeland Security Department seemingly hellbent on deporting him to a foreign county.
Finally, we examine the excruciatingly painful and humanely troubling report of an Illinois judge who has chronicled--and condemned--the illegal actions and misconduct of federal law enforcement on the streets of Chicago in recent weeks, purportedly present to quell community unrest that never existed in the first place. And the broadcast concludes with the findings of still another judge who determined that the recent military deployments in our nation's capital by the President are both factually unjustified and constitutionally invalid.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to the show and today's episode dives deep into the whirlwind of recent Supreme Court activities. Host and Former US Attorney Jim Santelle dissects the Court's decision conferences, highlighting the denial of Kim Davis's appeal against same-sex marriage and a new case on Mississippi's mail-in ballot law. The Court's fascination with religion gets another spotlight in the Landor case, where Rastafarian dreadlocks meet prison policies. Katanji Brown Jackson's strategic maneuvering in the SNAP funding saga reveals her tactical brilliance amid a government shutdown. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice grapples with internal chaos, including Maureen Comey's lawsuit and the controversial prosecutions of James Comey and Letitia James.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week regarding whether or not the president has the power to levy tariffs, essentially sidestepping the power of The Congress and Article 1 of The US Constitution.
A majority of the show is dedicated to this very important case and we hear from John Sauer, the US Solicitor General, as well as the Justices. And in this matter where The Court has sided many times with President Trump, the questions being asked makes clear there is skepticism and the concern comes from unlikely figures on the bench, Jim also talks about what to expect post-argument and the possibility of a decision being reached as soon as this weekend, but issued in the coming months.
But its not just the one case, because Jim highlights other cases we should be aware of, including one that seeks to reverse marriage equality while another, now (because of the The Court's Shadow Docket) makes it harder for Transgender folks to travel which also hampers their ability to exist.
Rounding out the show, Jim speaks on the decision from The Court, upholding the stay from the president regarding SNAP funds. He also talks "Injunction Function", which is now his weekly overview of all of the judges in courts nationwide doing all they can to keep the White House seizing all power and rendering our Construction, moot.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Good morning and welcome to another edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. This week, federal courts were a battleground as judges confronted executive overreach, issuing injunctions to stop disruptive policies of the Trump Administration amid the federal government shutdown. In Rhode Island and Massachusetts, judges ordered the administration to release emergency SNAP funds, defying claims that reserves were untouchable.
And in Washington D.C., Jim takes a look at a case where a judge quashed a proof of citizenship mandate for voter registration. Meanwhile, in San Francisco, a court blocked mass federal employee firings, while Chicago’s streets saw judicial action against ICE brutality. With the Supreme Court poised to rule on presidential tariff authority, Jim outlines that the judiciary stands as a bulwark against authoritarianism, even as controversial cases against James Comey and Letitia James unravel.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to another weekend edition of Amicus: A Law Review. This week, Jim Santelle unpacks a whirlwind of legal controversies surrounding presidential authority. He delves into high-profile prosecutions of Trump's adversaries, James Comey, Letitia James, and John Bolton, highlighting motions for dismissal amid claims of vindictive prosecution. Jim scrutinizes Trump's use of pardon power, notably commuting George Santos's sentence and pardoning crypto mogul Changpeng Zhao, aka CZ.
The episode turns to the contentious deployment of National Guard troops in cities like Chicago and Portland, challenged in federal courts. Finally, Jim dissects U.S. military actions against Venezuelan boats, questioning their legality under constitutional and congressional war powers.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Good morning and welcome to another weekend edition of Amicus: A Law Review. On today's episode, Jim Santelle dives deep into the potential dismantling of the Voting Rights Act as the Supreme Court weighs Louisiana v. Calais, a case that challenges Section II's necessity in modern America. Justices Kavanaugh and Jackson spar over the Act's relevance, with implications for the 2026 elections.
Meanwhile, federal courts push back against Trump's National Guard deployments in Chicago and Portland, citing lack of evidence for insurrection claims. Judge Sarah Ellis admonishes ICE for aggressive tactics in Chicago, while Judge Susan Ilston halts politically motivated layoffs tied to the shutdown. Finally, John Bolton's indictment raises questions of legitimacy amid political retribution concerns.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to another weekend edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. On this edition, Jim dives into the week's legal dramas, starting with the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, exploring allegations of vindictive prosecution under President Trump's directives.
Then, Jim transitions to discuss the President's controversial attempts to deploy the National Guard in cities like Portland and Chicago, sparking federal court battles over executive authority. And last but certainly not least, the Supreme Court's new term is in full swing, tackling cases on conversion therapy bans and absentee ballot counting. The upcoming week promises more legal fireworks, including a pivotal Voting Rights Act challenge from Louisiana.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
To open the show up, Jim gives an overview on what we are going to talk about today. The Fall Docket of the US Supreme Court is starting next week and a little know decision from the 1930's is coming back into the conversation and Jim will cover it all, as well as other topics. Jim gives an overview of something called "Humphrey's Executor" and how it's still vital and used today, but of course, it's usefulness will be called into question by The Trump Administration. Then we work our way into the news of the James Comey indictment, as well as a controversary with another former FBI Director. Jim looks at how a Trump loyalist will put a man over the process and the concern of one US Senator In the second hour, we discuss the new docket of The US Supreme Court for 2025/2026. There are many cases to be reviewed by the Court and Jim highlights some of them for you today. He also tackles the story about Associate Justice Thomas giving his thoughts on the topic on one of the most aspects of the decision process of his and any court. Giving highlights on just some of the cases coming to The Court this week, Jim also talks about a judge who was just doing his job and now is facing backlash from The Supreme Court, as well as intimidation tactics because of his written opinion on immigration. And we bring the show to a close with Jim's opinion on a government shutdown, as he has experience with one. He talks about the direct effects felt on us as the voters and what it means for the those who work in the federal government. To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
On this weekend's special edition of "Amicus: A Law Review," we will report on and address a wide variety of topics related to the government-shocking and justice-fracturing criminal indictment of former FBI Director James Comey: That extensive analysis will begin with explanations of the charges against him, the mechanisms that produced them, and what might reasonably follow in the weeks and months ahead—not only procedurally but also substantively, including reasonable expectations for the ultimate disposition of this unprecedented court case.
No less important, we'll explain exactly what modern authoritarianism is all about, describe precisely how the Chief Executive has now assumed and exercised the powers of an authoritarian, examine the catastrophic implications of the Comey charges on the fundamental trappings of the Rule of Law (including the long-term implications for the future of the grand jury process), and expose the fundamental motivations of politically-animated criminal prosecutions--that is, not necessarily to accomplish convictions but to visit such harsh retribution on identified targets that the process itself becomes the retaliatory punishment.
Further down Pennsylvania Avenue at the crest of Capitol Hill, we'll also explain the immediate and history-altering implications of the latest "shadow docket" order of the Supreme Court--on the surface permitting the White House (without any authority) to terminate the independent position of a Commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission but more sweepingly altering once again the checks and balances of our Republic in favor of an all-powerful presidency. Along the way, we'll also explain why a case called "Humphrey's Executor" now needs to enter the common lexicon of all Americans as the benchmark against which this tumultuous time in our history will forever be measured.
Because of the transcendent significance of these calamitous executive and judicial actions of the past week, listeners will be especially encouraged to ask issue-specific questions about exactly what is going on--and what exactly they might reasonable anticipate in the times ahead--by calling (855) 752-4842 or by texting those focused inquiries into the Civic Media on-line chat box.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
This weekend on Amicus: A Law Review, Jim Santelle dives into the turbulent news of American civics and constitutional integrity. At the Supreme Court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor decries the decline in civics education, warning of confusion between presidents and kings, while Trump proposes alarming expansions of presidential powers, including targeting 'narco-terrorists.'
Plus, the administration's crackdown on dissent riles philanthropies and media alike, with US Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and others pushing back. Amidst this, the US Department of Justice faces scrutiny for misrepresentations in court and retaliatory firings of FBI agents. As legal battles rage, federal judges stand as bulwarks against the erosion of constitutional norms.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Good morning an thank you for joining another weekend edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. Following a week marked by tragic violence at Utah Valley University and Evergreen High School, the show takes a look at the First and Second Amendments' scope and restrictions.
Jim Santelle then shares a critique of the Supreme Court's shadow docket, highlighting rulings that alter law enforcement standards without explanation, sparking judicial disarray. These rulings, including a contentious decision on immigration detentions, reflect a broader pattern of opacity and procedural chaos that undermines the federal judiciary's coherence.
In a look at legal news abroad, Santelle also discusses Jair Bolsonaro's sentencing in Brazil and emphasizes the constitutional limits on speech and gun rights, urging legislative action to enhance public safety.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Your host, Jim Santelle gets right into the moment with so much news happening in the world of law. We discuss the new docket coming up for The Supreme Court starting this Fall and what we should expect. Next, a fully funded, mostly completed green energy project is being stopped for "security reasons", but we know it's because the Commander-In-Chief is swinging at windmills.
Then, Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett has a new book out and there a lot of questions, many of which aren't being answered in its pages. Jim speaks to the history of her decision making process on the bench, including unlikely alliances.
Jim goes further into the upcoming docket which has a case that seeks to upend a landmark decision from just a decade ago. He also discusses some of the other high profile cases to be brought before the Court this year including one whose outcome will have huge impact on the fight for Transgender rights, as well as a case that deals with US voting rights. The latter is seen as the biggest case to be reviewed in this session.
To round out the show, Jim gives a quick overview on some of the important cases coming out of courts from around the country. He also takes your calls and reads your texts and we thank you for reaching out with your questions and comments.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
On this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review, Jim Santelle dives into a week of judicial fireworks as courts across America rebuke presidential actions. The Federal Circuit Court delivers a crushing blow to Trump's sweeping tariffs, declaring them unconstitutional and beyond presidential power.
Meanwhile, the Ninth Circuit protects Venezuelan immigrants' temporary status against executive overreach. District courts echo this sentiment, halting expedited deportations and preserving Voice of America's leadership from executive dismissal. Along with that, a fiery ruling from Judge Thomas Cullen in Virginia dismisses the DOJ's unprecedented lawsuit against Maryland's judiciary, calling for respect among government branches.
Wrapping up the weekend, Jim previews the upcoming Supreme Court term, highlighting key cases on its docket and what listeners should keep in mind for the next term.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
In a fiery dissection of recent legal dramas, Jim Santelle navigates the stormy seas of politics entangled with law enforcement. The FBI's raid on John Bolton's home raises questions about the mix of retribution and legitimate investigation and the misuse of classified documents, as federal agents seek evidence of potential Espionage Act violations.
Meanwhile, the spectacle of Ghislaine Maxwell's 'interview' with Deputy AG Todd Blanche reveals a theater of softball questions, as the Deputy Attorney General, Todd Blanche, yields no new revelations but paints a troubling picture of political favoritism. Maxwell praises Trump and minimizes her crimes, hinting at a pardon and as one listener said "Diminishes the severity of her actions in an attempt to reframe crimes to the public."
Jim finishes the show with the New York Appeals Court, who threw out a massive fine against Trump, though civil fraud remains proven. And The Supreme Court delivers a convoluted ruling allowing Trump to cancel NIH grants, reflecting the chaotic state of U.S. jurisprudence.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Good morning and thank you for joining us for another weekend edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. This weekend's syllabus includes a riveting discussion on the fraying rule of law, spotlighting unsettling trends in judicial and governmental actions.
Jim walks through instances of judges grappling with the Supreme Court's shadow docket, leading to 'malicious compliance' and in some cases some differing and creative legal interpretations. The presumption of regularity is eroding as judges increasingly distrust government attorneys around the nation.
And in a closer look, Jim examines the controversial military presence in D.C., raising Fourth Amendment concerns, and the Unitary Executive Theory, promoted by more and more folks on the conservative end of the country's political spectrum, further straining governmental credibility.
And Jim also touches on Appellate Courts delivering mixed judgments on key issues like transgender rights and DEI funding, setting the stage for a dramatic and uncertain Supreme Court term to come.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to another weekend edition of Amicus: A Law Review. Jim Santelle guides you through a tumultuous landscape, federal judges are increasingly at odds with the Supreme Court, pushing back against executive orders on birthright citizenship, deportations, and arts funding cuts. This defiance, termed departmentalism, challenges the traditional presumption of regularity, as judges question the truthfulness of Justice Department lawyers.
Then the episode explores retribution under the second Trump Administration, targeting FBI officials, judges, and public figures like New York Attorney General Letitia James and now U.S. Senator Adam Schiff, threatening the stability of civil rights and institutional integrity. Amidst this judicial sparring, the public's trust in the Department of Justice continues to erode.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to another weekend edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. What is happening in Texas? Jim dives into the incident surrounding redistricting and gerrymandering, with the southern state at the forefront of a rare, controversial mid-decade map redraw that could potentially shift political balances nationally. Plus, the Supreme Court's involvement in a Louisiana redistricting case might reshape the Voting Rights Act entirely.
Meanwhile, President Trump's sweeping tariff initiatives face skepticism from a Federal Circuit Court, questioning his constitutional authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. And on the citizenship front, the First and Ninth Circuits challenge Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship, reaffirming the century-old precedent. It's a constantly shift legal field right now, with stretching of presidential powers and challenges to procedural norms.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Jim Santelle, a former United States Attorney in Wisconsin and Justice Department official in Washington, is among Civic Media’s resident legal commentators and frequent on-air analysts. Join Jim each Saturday morning from 9 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. for “Amicus: A Law Review,” as current events meet civics understanding—through in-depth analysis and discussion (including your listener calls) of the most recent developments in the areas of law, government, courts, and the aspiration for justice.
On this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review, Jim highlights the World Court's bold climate change ruling urging global responsibility and contrasts that to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's controversial rollback on greenhouse gas policies.
Jim also takes a look at federal court rulings, notably the Kilmar Abrego Garcia deportation saga, spotlighting judicial pushback against government overreach. Th show discusses the Supreme Court's use of the shadow docket, with recent decisions allowing the president to fire Consumer Product Safety Commission members and in a case involving challenges to the Voting Rights Act in North Dakota. Santelle also covers the ongoing Jeffrey Epstein saga, emphasizing Occam's razor in understanding the convoluted case that has made its way back into the nation's headlines.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to another weekend edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. Kicking off the show, Jim dives deep into the murky waters of the Supreme Court's "shadow docket," where emergency rulings sans explanations are reshaping American law.
Plus, with rampant firings at the Department of Justice, seasoned attorneys like Maureen Comey and ethics chief Joseph Terrell are ousted, reflecting Trump's relentless grip on federal agencies. What do these departures mean for our legal system and listeners across the state?
In addition to that, the Jeffrey Epstein saga has been reignited in recent days with Trump's dubious push to release grand jury transcripts, casting a shadow over the victims' plight. Wrapping up the weekend, Jim discusses the courts tackling birthright citizenship, FTC terminations, ICC sanctions, and the rule of law hanging in the balance.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to another weekend edition of Amicus: A Law Review with your host Jim Santelle. Dive into the weekend's whirlwind of legal drama with Santelle taking a closer looks as Wisconsin's Supreme Court bolsters gubernatorial rulemaking, striking a blow against conversion therapy bans and redefining legislative power. It has been a busy week in the state when it comes to legal news.
Taking a look beyond Wisconsin, a federal judge in California clamped down on ICE racial profiling, demanding due process for detainees. And in New Hampshire, another judge pushes back against Trump's birthright citizenship order, leveraging class action to skirt SCOTUS's recent national injunction ban.
However, event with those set backs around the country, the U.S. Supreme Court greenlights Trump's sweeping federal workforce cuts, controversy brews at the State Department and DOJ, where mass firings threaten America's diplomatic and prosecutorial prowess. Let Jim Santelle walk you through all the legal news of the past seven days.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Thank you for joining us for another weekend edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. On this edition, the show dives into recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions reshaping the legal landscape. Jim discusses a pivotal ruling that ended national injunctions, limiting federal judges' powers to issue broad orders, and therefore enhancing presidential authority. Controversially, parents can now opt out of LGBTQIA-themed school lessons, raising concerns about educational integrity.
On the more local level this week, the Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down the state's 1849 abortion ban, emphasizing modern legislative intentions. The episode also covers Sean "Diddy" Combs' partial acquittal on sex trafficking and Bryan Kohberger's life sentence plea deal for murder. Amidst these judicial maneuvers, the Department of Justice eyes citizenship revocations and election oversight. A complex interplay of power and rights is in full discussion on Amicus: A Law Review.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
The Supreme Court term has come to a close and we have a weekend with a bonus edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. In this second part of the weekend's program, Jim takes a look at the whirlwind of legal drama as the Supreme Court tackles hot-button issues spanning free speech, religious liberty, and regulation.
Up first from Texas, the Court upholds the state's age verification law for online adult content, sparking the next chapter of debate over First Amendment rights across the nation. Then in a Maryland case, parents win the right to opt their kids out of LGBTQ-themed school lessons on religious grounds, igniting concerns about educational censorship.
Meanwhile, the FCC triumphs in boosting broadband access for underserved communities, dodging the non-delegation doctrine this time around. As the U.S. Supreme Court wades through these complex cultural and constitutional waters, the decisions from the end of this term are redefining the American legal landscape.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
The Supreme Court term has come to a close and we have a weekend with a bonus edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. Jim dives into the Supreme Court's momentous ruling in Trump v. Casa, stripping federal courts of the power to issue nationwide injunctions against executive orders, marking a seismic shift in judicial checks on presidential power. Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion clashes fiercely with dissenters like Ketanji Brown Jackson, sparking fiery exchanges over judicial and executive boundaries.
This episode further dissects the decision's broader implications, including potential patchwork legal landscapes and heightened presidential authority. Additional coverage includes a win for preventive care under the Affordable Care Act and the Court's punt on a pivotal Louisiana redistricting case.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to another edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. It has been a legal whirlwind of a week, and Jim Santelle breaks down a controversial week at the Supreme Court for you across the airwaves. The Justices upheld a Tennessee law banning medical treatments for transgender youth, sparking fierce debate on equal protection and states' rights. Justice Roberts leaned on legislative deference, while Sonia Sotomayor's dissent warned against abandoning judicial review.
Meanwhile, the court also navigated environmental jurisdiction in cases about nuclear waste and refinery exemptions, deciding which courts should tackle these thorny issues. As new cases loom on abortion clinic subpoenas and WWII oil production, the legal landscape is anything but settled, so be sure to tune in for next week's edition of Amicus for more friendly break downs of the legal news of the week.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
There is a jam packed show for you today. As always, your host, Jim Santelle kicks it off with a brief overview of our syllabus and gets right into the updates on what he calls "Injunction Function". Judges are working overtime to stop the orders of the president and uphold the Constitution. He then takes time to review an opinion from N. California Judge Charles Breyer on the National Guard being deployed to The Golden State.
In the second hour; a decision on whether or not proof of citizenship is necessary while voted and the wide swath of decisions coming from The High Court and who is siding with who on the current cases being decided. Wrapping things up for this week, Jim speaks on breaking news out of Minnesota and discusses the protests taking place around the country.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
In a whirlwind of legal drama, Jim Santelle dissects the explosive return of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, deported without due process but now back under a federal indictment in Tennessee for alien smuggling. Santelle takes it to Attorney General Pam Bondi for her inflammatory rhetoric and neglecting the presumption of innocence, a core tenant of the American legal system.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court stirs controversy by granting Elon Musk's team at DOGE access to sensitive Social Security data, ignoring privacy concerns raised by organizations. Unanimous rulings also emerge, including a rejection of Mexico's lawsuit against U.S. gun makers, and a decision leveling the playing field in employment discrimination cases.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Guest: Jim Santelle
Good morning and welcome to another edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. To begin this episode, Jim dives into the latest legal battles and court rulings shaping American and international landscapes. Jim provides updates with what is changing with the judicial elections in Mexico and then Santelle critiques the Supreme Court's shadow docket decisions, allowing the Trump administration to deport 500,000 immigrants, challenging humanitarian protections.
Kicking off the second hour of the program, Jim highlights Harvard University standing strong against the President’s attempts to block international students, with federal judges siding with academia. The show also brings attention to Secretary of State Marco Rubio targeting Chinese students, and threatening to revoke their visas.
Finally, the show shares this week's "Injunction Function", unraveling a hidden provision in the congressional spending bill that could strip judges of their power to enforce orders without imposing costly bonds, raising alarms about judicial independence and the rule of law.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to a full syllabus on this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review. Jim runs down a recap of what habeas corpus is, and then dives into the week's legal headlines.
This week, the Supreme Court delivered landmark rulings impacting immigration, religious freedom, and the power of the presidency. In a split decision, the Court allowed Oklahoma to use public funds for a religious charter school, spotlighting tensions in church-state separation.
The nation's highest court shielded Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell from presidential firing while permitting removals at other federal agencies, hinting at a reshaped executive power. However, the justices also let the Trump administration lift protections for 350,000 Venezuelan immigrants, raising deportation stakes.
Meanwhile, district courts halted Trump's orders dismantling the Department of Education and targeting Harvard's international student enrollment, underscoring judicial checks on executive overreach. Jim ends the show with a tribute to Memorial Day reflections, highlighting sacrifices made for the constitutional principles discussed each and every weekend on Amicus: A Law Review with James Santelle.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
In the first hour, Jim tackles the arguments happening in the US Supreme Court taking place as we pre-record this episode regarding Birthright Citizenship aka, the 14th Amendment. He also talks about the other case included which is taking on whether or not a judge in a single district, in a single court can pass an injunction which will be recognized nationwide. Jim looks at the chilling effects inside and outside the courtroom.
In the second hour, Jim is breaking down all of the salient details of the case against Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan. Judge Dugan was arrested a few weeks ago and as of the recording of today's show has entered a plea of Not Guilty. Jim goes over the prosecution's case, as well as the defense. Rounding out the show, Jim discusses the latest legal news from the world of The Menendez Brothers. We round out the show talking about the huge changes in the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department and what we mean by "Disparate Impact".
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
In this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review, Jim Santelle explores the rich legacy of Justice David Souter, who defied expectations with his centrist approach on the Supreme Court, who passed away this week. Notable landmark cases include Planned Parenthood v. Casey and Bush v. Gore. His unexpected decisions left a lasting impact on American jurisprudence.
Looking from the past to the current matters of the nation's highest court, Jim takes a look at the Supreme Court's recent ruling allows the Trump administration's controversial ban on transgender military personnel to proceed, highlighting ongoing tension between executive actions and judicial checks. Additionally, the Court's decision to hear a challenge to the 14th Amendment’s birthright citizenship clause raises questions about judicial intervention in longstanding constitutional interpretations.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
To kick off this week's edition of Amicus, Jim Santelle delves into the controversial arrest of Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan by the Department of Justice, highlighting the potential misconduct and policy violations by the FBI. The discussion underscores the broader implications for judicial independence and the rule of law. Santelle also covers the developing stories around Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers receiving threats from the Trump Administration for his actions on advising state officials on how to interact with federal immigration officials.
The episode also explores recent U.S. Supreme Court cases, including debates on religious charter schools and parental opt-outs in public school curriculums, posing significant First Amendment questions. Additionally, Santelle covers a critical case challenging the ACA’s mandate on free preventive care, with potential nationwide repercussions on health insurance coverage.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Milwaukee was the center of breaking news on Friday morning with the arresting of Wisconsin Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan by federal law enforcement officials. This episode dives into the details surrounding the arrest of Milwaukee County Judge Dugan, and the charges of obstructing immigration agents.
Host Jim Santelle critiques the Justice Department's approach, arguing it politicizes the judiciary to align with President Trump's immigration policies. The discussion also touches on Governor Evers' memo to state employees about handling ICE agents and the broader implications of federal versus state authority in courthouses.
Listeners are invited to question the balance between justice and political influence. The podcast explores the legal procedures behind her arrest, highlighting the controversial decision to physically detain her.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. Jim leads off the show with a breakdown of the U.S. Supreme Court's overnight decision blocking deportations of migrants with the use of an eighteenth century war-time act. Highlighting key developments, the show covers the Supreme Court's late-night decision and the Fourth Circuit's powerful rebuke of government actions that deny due process.
The episode also covers the current constitutional crisis, sparked by the Trump administration's refusal to adhere to court rulings. Judges Boasberg and Xinis are spotlighted for confronting the administration's defiance, with Boasberg threatening contempt proceedings and Xinis demanding accountability for wrongful deportations. The discussion underscores the erosion of checks and balances, urging listeners to consider their role in preserving the Republic.
The show concludes with taking phone callers from around Wisconsin with their questions for Jim on the legal news of the week.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Jim kicks off this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review with a recap of the legal proceedings surrounding the second Trump Administration's deportations of Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador and taking callers on a variety of legal manners.
During the second hour, Jim also covers the issues in Columbia V. Mahmoud Khalil, the Supreme Court's take on the Clean Air Act and the FCC, and the controversy over the Administration targeting election officials still surrounding the 2020 presidential election.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
On this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle, Jim shares his latest "Injunction Function" and recaps the legal filings of Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul this past week. At the end of the first hour and beginning of the second hour, Jim touches on what is occurring with the legal battles surrounding deportations of Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador.
Throughout the second hour, Jim provides a rundown of what the U.S. Supreme Court is currently hearing. Those cases include grants to teachers working with diversity, equity and inclusion, birthright citizenship, Catholic charities, Planned Parenthood funding and more.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Jim kicks off this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review with a syllabus for the show and an acknowledgement of the Myanmar and Thailand earthquakes. From there, Jim takes a look at the bombings by the United States in Yemen and the fallout from defense officials using the unsecure app Signal to coordinate those U.S. strikes.
Jim takes callers around the state on the consequences of Signal-gate along with his next topic, the shutting down of law firms or at least the threats of shut downs by the second Trump Administration. Plus, this weekend's "Injunction Function" takes a closer look at labor, diversity and deportation.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. The show introduces a new segment titled, 'Injunction Function' and this week breaks down a temporary restraining orders or TRO. Jim does a deep dive on their meaning, and what it means for your understanding of our legal system.
Then, the show takes calls from listeners concerned about Elon Musk's involvement in the second Trump Administration and the election here in Wisconsin. Plus, Jim dives into the legal case unfolding before the deportations and the U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg of what the Administration claims are Venezuelan Immigrants.
To close out the morning show, Jim does a rapid fire across the second hour including the shuttering of USAID, the dwindling of services at the Social Security Administration, a closer look at the Transgender Troop Ban, and caller comments and questions!
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Amicus Notes
9:06 Show Intro/Rundown
9:20 DOJ Overview
9:34 Trump Speech @ DOJ
9:50 Trump Speech Cont.
9:54 Taking Callers
10:08 More Callers
10:20 Trump v. Law Firms
10:34 Shakespeare Alliteration
10:39 Callers
10:43 Judge Alsup "Sham" Firing
10:52 SCOTUS 14th Amendment Case
10:56 Conversion Therapy
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Good morning and welcome to another edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle! Jim lays out the syllabus for this weekend's show, beginning with detailing the showdown this past week between President Donald Trump and Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court John Roberts. Jim breaks down the decision of the nation's highest court to deny the hold the Trump Administration had placed on $2 billion worth of foreign aid.
In the second half of the first hour, Jim also details legal aspects that are arising in cases regarding the Clean Water Act & San Francisco Waste Water, as well as another in regards to a Hungary Holocaust Case.Jim then begins the second hour recapping the riff between the Supreme Court and the second Trump Administration. Jim lays out the details surrounding two cases that are having oral arguments this past week. One regarding a Mexican Lawsuit against Gun Manufacturers and another regarding Nuclear Waste.
Jim takes calls from the listening audience and closes out the weekend's program with a discussion on a religious case rising out of Oklahoma and what is going on with federal judges in Rhode Island and Washington DC.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Jim begins this weekend's show walking through the syllabus for the day's program. Jim discusses the Zelenskyy White House Visit, and takes phone callers on the subject.
Jim then takes the beginning of the second hour to tackle the subject of the termination of JAG Officers throughout the Department of Defense this week and again, takes calls on the subject. To round out the weekend's program, Jim discusses aspects of the Bondi Justice Department and a summary of cases before the Supreme Court of the United States.
To learn more about these shows and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
In today's episode, Jim takes time to talk about authoritarianism in bygone days. This discussion comes in the wake of recent decisions from the Trump White House, who believes he is the only one who can decide what is right and what is law. History tells us those who declare "I Am The State" don't last and aren't remembered fondly in the history books.
On Tuesday Donald Trump issued a very significant and historic executive order, abolishing various independent agencies, bringing the power held by those groups into the Executive Branch, specifically The White House. Standing in the face a a great deal of precedence from the courts, the president is garnering more power and making sure that any and all work being done has to be in the best interest of the King's president's agenda.
Jim takes your calls, texts and livestream comments during the show answering your questions on this very historic moment in American history. We appreciate you reaching out to us with your thoughts on the matter and love hearing from you.
Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle is a part of the Civic Media radio network and airs Saturdays from 9-11 am across Wisconsin. Subscribe to the podcast to be sure not to miss out on a single episode! To learn more about the show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up.
Welcome to another edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle for a breakdown of the week's legal headlines. Jim begins the program with a review of case surrounding New York Mayor Eric Adams in his corruption charges, and attempt for a pardon from the second Trump Administration.
Jim continues the program with a dive into Attorney General Pam Bondi's Department of Justice. The show breaks down the powers the Justice Department yields, and some of the characters at the DOJ in the second Trump Administration. Jim rounds out the weekend by taking some phone calls and discussing some final memorandums from Bondi's Department of Justice.
Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle is a part of the Civic Media radio network and airs Saturdays from 9-11 am across Wisconsin. Subscribe to the podcast to be sure not to miss out on a single episode! To learn more about the show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up.
Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle is a part of the Civic Media radio network and airs Saturdays from 9-11 am across Wisconsin. Subscribe to the podcast to be sure not to miss out on a single episode! To learn more about the show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up.
Beginning with the latest reporting on the tragic air crash near and profound loss of lives over the Potomac River, including some initial reflection on the appropriate roles of government in supporting and assisting the victim families and pursuing on their behalf a full and revelatory investigation of what happened. There will be more assessment of the rule of law components of those post-event obligations of our agency officials and public representatives in next week’s broadcast.
Followed by an extensive description of the major obstructive changes already underway under the Trump Administration’s Justice Department—including the suspension of important civil rights cases, the reassignment of trial attorneys from their long-standing human rights posts, the firing of prosecutors previously responsible for the criminal cases against Donald Trump for election interference and document theft, and the directive to investigate and charge local and state law enforcement officials who do not support the aggressive immigration policies of the new Administration.
Updating the most recent justice-related actions of our Supreme Court—focusing on arguments about the uses of force by our nation’s police officers and the resurrection of a federal law prohibiting money laundering. Jim also describes the flurry of oral hearings scheduled for February and March on major government issues and doctrines important to all Americans.
Finally, some “Rule of Law Snapshots” on recent in-court events involving the criminal charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams, the federal sentencing of former United States Senator Robert Menendez, and the settlement of the multi-million dollar defamation judgment against former senior White House advisor and New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
Programming Note: In the next Amicus broadcast, more on the outrageous and destructive dismissal of civil servants throughout our country’s key agencies, including Justice Department lawyers and FBI agents responsible for investigating and prosecuting some 1600 January 6 rioter-insurrectionists.
Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle is a part of the Civic Media radio network and airs Saturdays from 9-11 am across Wisconsin. Subscribe to the podcast to be sure not to miss out on a single episode! To learn more about the show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up.
Join Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle each Saturday morning from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. as he analyzes the big legal news stories of the week and offers his own perspective on what they mean now—and for the future of our nation!
Jim begins the show with sharing where the guard rails of the U.S. Constitution are for a President of the United States. What powers do the rest of the federal government have on that office? Jim breaks it down. Jim also touches on the role of U.S. Attorney's role, mission, and assignments of those important actors in our legal system.
The courts also play a role in the legal process surrounding the Executive Orders coming out of the White House in the first week of the second Trump Administration. What are judges saying on some of these orders in the federal courts? We'll dive into those words shared by several federal judges this week.
Lastly, Jim touches on pardons. Both the sweeping ones issues by President Trump this week for January 6th insurrectionist, as well as the outgoing pardons by former President Joe Biden.
To learn more about these shows and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
This week on Amicus: A Law Review, Jim focuses on the Oath of Office that will be taken by the 47th President of the United States on Monday, Donald Trump. Jim emphasizes what the Take Care Clause is in that Oath and why it's language is so important.
Jim also breaks down the revelation over this past week recognizing a 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, when Joe Biden said the Equal Rights Amendment should be deemed a part of the nation's legal doctrine. We will also get a Supreme Court update from Jim surrounding the nation's highest court's decision to unanimously hold up the legislation that banned Tiktok in the United States.
To learn more about these shows and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
At the top of the show, Jim addresses the fires blazing through Los Angeles right now and how this natural disaster will be intertwined with government, as well as the law.
Next, Jim speaks on his time as an intern in and the work of, the Carter Administration. President Carter's funeral was this week and he was laid to rest in his home state of Georgia. Jim speaks on the work in and out of office of this nuclear engineer, peanut farmer and 39th President.
Then, Donald Trump's case in New York has come to an end and the sentencing has been handed down. The extraordinary nature of this case, Jim explains what it means for the former president, as well as his administration going forward. Jim takes calls and texts from the listeners on this topic and beyond.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Good morning and welcome to the first edition of Amicus: A Law Review for 2025! Jim begins the show with a detailed look at the sentencing hearing we now know if coming for the president-elect this week, as Judge Juan Merchan announced Donald Trump to be in court on January 10th for that sentencing. Following that in-depth look, Jim touches on an update from the 6th U.S. Circuit Court that brought us the lower court rulings in two impactful cases in recent year from the U.S. Supreme Court; the Chevron ruling and now Net Neutrality.
After that, the show briefly touches on the citizen unrest that is taking place in South Korea following the constitutional crisis that nation is currently experiencing and the different path they are taking as a country in accountability of that crisis. Jim also dives into what is happening with pending ban of TikTok in the United States.
To wrap the show, Jim provides his predications for what will be the Top 15 Rule of Law Events coming in 2025. From civil servant protections to the constitutionality of the right to privacy, Jim shares his thoughts on what we can expect for the Rule of Law in the coming year. Finally, Jim shares a memoriam for President Jimmy Carter who passed away at the age of 100 last week. Jim had the pleasure of interning in the Carter Administration to begin his career in 1980.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to the final weekend of 2024, we're glad that you are spending it with us here at Amicus: A Law Review! The show begins with a breakdown of the individuals that had their death sentences commuted by President Joe Biden in the final days of his Administration. Jim then spends some time talking about environmental goals and the homelessness issues facing the nation over this past year.
In the second hour, the show tackles a judiciary report on the Supreme Court of the United States, Jim talks about the TikTok ban that president-elect Donald Trump is looking to have tossed out by the SCOTUS, and we review a report surrounding Clarence Thomas. To end the final show of 2024, Jim does a legal year in review for the listeners.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to this week's edition of Amicus: A Law Review. Kicking off the weekend's news, Jim recaps the events that took place in Madison, WI this week with the Abundant Life Christian School shooting. Jim discusses what is know at this time in regard to the shooting.
Jim then discusses the aspect of ghost guns in shootings similar to the one involved in the alleged UnitedHealthCare CEO shooting. The investigations into suspect Luigi Mangione seem to indicate a ghost gun was involved in that incident.
Jim spends the second hour discussing the Juan Merchan rulings this week that did not dismiss the cases against Donald Trump in New York court. The show touches on a number of dust ups the former and soon to be once again president has had with the media. The show wraps with a brief update on cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Jim lays out the case where he is going on this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review and then dives right in. First off this morning, Jim discusses the aspects of what happened in South Korea with Martial Law this month. Then, Jim revisits the presidential pardons delivered by Joe Biden and Donald Trump during his first term.
In the second hour, Jim tackles the news of the week in the Wisconsin Fake Electors case being litigated in Wisconsin state court. Throughout the hour, Jim takes your phone calls and also recaps updates from the Election Hush Money case in Manhattan. The weekend wraps with an update about the U.S. Supreme Court.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle. This weekend, Jim provides an overview of something that a lot have folks have been talking about over the past week, presidential pardons. Jim gives a history of presidential pardons, talks about the specific pardon given to Hunter Biden this past week by his father President Joe Biden and then touches on the topic of preemptive pardons in the remaining days of the Biden Administration.
In hour two, Jim breaks down a case that is before the U.S. Supreme Court regarding vaping and takes a call from host of the WMDX morning show, John Peterson. Later in the hour, Jim touches on United States v. Skrmetti, the transgender rights court cases before the Supreme Court of the United States. Jim rounds out the hour with a discussion of Kash Patel and martial law in South Korea.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, BlueSky, YouTube, X, and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
On this last Saturday of November, Jim Santelle starts off the show by taking a look at what this month's election means for legal cases that surrounded former President Trump before being re-elected. Jim then takes a look at U.S. Supreme Court statistics, dives into the Nom-Delegation Doctrine and recaps a few of the cases that may or may not come before the Court in this next term.
Jim also takes your calls on the legal questions of the day and takes a trip around the legal world sharing of cases law in Australia and Great Britain. Amicus concludes for this week's edition with a review of a case developing in Texas surrounding public education and bibles.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
On this week's Amicus, a packed syllabus as Jim covers developments in the cases being prosecuted against President-elect Trump, nominations for Trump's cabinet, and some legal news from overseas.
First, analyzing Pam Bondi, Trump's newest nomination for the Attorney General of the United States. This nomination follows Matt Gaetz' nomination for the position and voluntary withdrawal after only 8 short days. So who is Pam Bondi? What qualifications does she possess and what concerns need to be addressed by the Senate in their duty to advise and consent to this nomination? Next, updates on the long-delayed sentencing from New York's felony financial crimes and election interference case against Donald Trump.
Why has Judge Merchan once more removed the sentencing session from the calendar? And what comes now? Jim urges every professional involved in this case and in those federal cases not yet being prosecuted: do not obey in advance. Despite your legitimate fears of reprisal, do NOT bend, do not bow to accommodate Trump. Let justice speak, and let justice reign. Finally, a few lessons we can learn from overseas in Brazil, Hong Kong, and France.
And in Brazil, a case eerily reminiscent of Trump's incitement of insurrection on January 6th, 2021. From Hong Kong, what advocates for democracy face under autocracies. And finally, continuing coverage from France of the ongoing trial as Gisele Pelicot seeks justice for horrific sexual abuse at the hands of her husband and dozens of other defendants.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review. During this weekend's show, Jim remembers Ted Olson, former Solicitor General of the United States who passed away this past week and then dives into the week's legal news.
The overwhelming legal headline of the week, Donald Trump has selected former Congressman Matt Gaetz to lead the Department of Justice in his second term. Gaetz was apparently the subject of an upcoming ethics report that is uncertain to be released following Gaetz resigning from Congress. Jim also touches base on the number of other positions being nominated by president-elect Donald Trump at the Department of Justice.
In the second hour, Jim gives a brief update from the United State Supreme Court and then expands on what the deputy Attorneys General nominations mean, along with who Trump has tapped to be the next Solicitor General.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
A lot has happened since we last met. Former President Trump is now President-Elect Trump and with that comes a lot of questions over what is going to happen with his existing cases. Jim gives an overview of the election, as well as what could happen to Donald Trump in the courtroom before or after he takes office.
In the second hour, Jim continues his review of what the country could possibly look like under a second Trump administration and why legal questions asked, but never tested are going to create new policies and practices inside and outside the courts.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
On this weekend's edition of Amicus, Jim dives into international judicial reforms in Mexico. Then, Jim describes the threats that are growing from the possibility of the U.S. Department of Justice to jail political opponents under a second Trump Administration.
Jim then wraps the final edition of Amicus before the November 5th General Election by talking about the U.S. Supreme Court's greenlight of a voter purge in Virginia and voting issues in Pennsylvania.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
This weekend on Amicus: A Law Review, Jim dives into a variety of legal topics and cases to share what you need to know from the land of the law. Jim kicks off the show with a look at the Baltimore Bridge Settlement and the case surrounding the Menendez Brothers following a recent true crime streaming movie following their story.
Jim then dives into a hypothetical scenario of what happens if Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump were to tie in the upcoming election. Jim wraps the show by taking a look at how the Department of Justice has or has not been subject to exploitation.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Join Jim Santelle as he walks us through the latest updates on cases at the Supreme court, Trump criminal trials, and more! Jim traveled to Madison for this weekend's edition of Amicus, to share legal updates of this past week from here in Wisconsin, the nation and the world.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
On this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review, Jim Santelle takes a look at the upcoming cases before the U.S. Supreme Court as they begin a new term. Jim spends much of the first hour discussing the oral arguments in the abortion case coming out of Texas, as well as the ghost gun case coming before the highest court.
In hour two, Jim debriefs on the death row case before the Supreme Court and a case the court may hear about transgender rights. Jim then dives into recaps several cases before the 5th Circuit Court surrounding e-cigarettes pornography, DNA in a death penalty case, and nuclear waste.
Jim also talks about the data breach that took place at Facebook, the Nvidia Case and shares a programming note with the audience.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
This weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review dives into the revelations in the case Special Counsel Jack Smith is bringing against former President Donald Trump in federal court. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan unsealed a filing that case this week and there is a lot to discuss from Special Counsel Smith's evidence against the former President. Jim breaks down the revelation in the case and takes calls on the subject as well.
Then, in hour two of Amicus, Jim shares updates in the legal case being brought by Haitian migrants against folks that have been attacking their immigration status in Springfield, OH. Jim also touches on the state abortion ban being overturned in Georgia and the prosecution of Tyre Nichols.
Jim concludes with an update on Wisconsin voting machines and a rundown of FBI crime statistics for listeners.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
On this weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review, Jim Santelle kicks off the morning with updates from the current litigation surrounding former President Donald Trump. That leads into Jim discussing the move this week of former New York Mayor and Trump Campaign attorney Rudy Giuliani being disbarred in Washington D.C. this week. Jim also touches base on the hack of the Trump campaign by Iran.
Bridging the hours this week, Jim touches bases on the indictment of current New York Mayor Eric Adams and the ties to Turkey that sparked the indictment. The show then highlights cases to keep an eye on ahead of the November election, voting rights in Arizona and the need for local clerks in Georgia to now hand count ballots in southern swing state.
The show wraps for the week with a legal story from the south of France where a man is on trial for decades of drugging his wife and committing sexual violence against her, along with updates from the U.S. legal cases surrounding Sean "Diddy" Combs and Harvey Weinstein.
Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle is a part of the Civic Media radio network and airs Saturdays from 9-11 am across Wisconsin. Subscribe to the podcast to be sure not to miss out on a single episode! To learn more about the show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up.
Welcome to another edition of Civic Media's weekend legal program, Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle! Jim kicks off the show with a discussion surrounding judicial reforms in Mexico. Then, Jim talks about the U.S. Supreme Court's three case decision to round out the first hour.
In hour two, Jim breaks down Supreme Court threat protection and books by Supreme Court Justices if you're all done with your summer reading list. Turning to a more serious note, Jim then discusses issues facing the administration of the upcoming election by a surprising culprit, Sheriffs. From casting doubts on absentee ballot drop boxes, to public posting about elections, to membership in anti-government groups, Jim breaks down the issue.
Jim then closes out the show with a rapid fire round of coverage with discussing the "Sensitive Places" case before the 9th Circuit Court, an impeachment against an Alaskan Judge, a NLRB decision regarding Texas, and the Hunter Biden sentencing.
To learn more about these shows and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
This weekend on Amicus, Jim Santelle covers the latest in national legal news. On Thursday, Attorney General Merrick Garland delivered a 22-minute speech addressing a sharp increase in threats leveled at agencies like the DOJ and FBI. After breaking down the speech, Jim speaks on more developments in cases related to Donald Trump, including January 6th, the Georgia election, and Chicago's Trump Tower. Jim then extensively updates us on the Tyre Nichols case before closing with news on Russian election interference.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
This week on Amicus: A Law Review, Jim Santelle guides us through the latest updates on Donald Trump's cases in both New York and Washington, D.C. In the second hour, Jim takes your calls before addressing the tragic mass shooting in Georgia.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
It's not the holiday weekend yet, so let's recap this past week of legal news with Amicus: A Law Review with James Santelle. Jim starts off the show with laying out everything he will cover on this weekend's edition and then dives into the new Grand Jury indictment against former President Donald Trump. Then, Jim discusses the hearing set for September 5th by Judge Chutkan.
Jim kicks off the second our of this week's Amicus by covering the 11th Circuit Appeal surrounding the case in Mar-a-Lago. Jim also takes calls throughout the hour and touches base on a case working it's way through the Georgia Appeals Court. To round out the week, Jim does a lightening round of recaps for the New York Hush Money case, an emergency Supreme Court docket, January 6th defendants and candidates on the Wisconsin ballot.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
This weekend's edition of Amicus: A Law Review begins with Jim recapping what the Supreme Court of the United States has been up to this summer. Then, Jim dives into the voting case in Arizona, an abortion referendum in Arkansas and a machine gun ban in Kansas throughout the first hour.
In hour two, Jim reviews what is happening with a lawyer for the Oath Keepers, one of the groups that was responsible and present throughout the insurrection against the United States on January 6th, 2021. Jim then goes on to discuss a clerk in Arizona that was found, former U.S. Representative George Santos who pled guilty this week, and touches on the RealPage Rent Collusion case that surfaced this week. Amicus wraps for the weekend with a few thoughts on undocumented spouses in the United States and what recent proposals would mean for those families.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Jim begins the show with sharing a rundown of the legal topics he plans to cover this weekend on Amicus: A Law Review. Kicking it off, the show dives into updates from a New York court case and that ballot cases taking place in the state of Georgia. To round out the first hour, Jim shares his reaction to the developments in the case surrounding Matthew Perry's death and the arrests this week that took place.
For the second hour, Jim reviews the Supreme Court Case surrounding transgender rights, a Montana legal case involving abortion that will make it to the Supreme Court and the UCLA Jewish Student case. Amicus wraps up the second hour with a discussion surrounding the 8th Circuit's review of the SAVE Plan and a book ban case along with the 4th Circuit's review of semi-automatic weapons ban in Maryland.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Good morning and thank you for joining Amicus: A Law Review on this second weekend of August. Jim kicks off the show with updates from a multitude of court cases from around the country. In the final segment of the first hour, Jim also updates listeners on the fake elector scheme.
To begin the second hour, Jim launches into the discussion of what should be done to reform the ethics of the U.S. Supreme Court. After that topic, Jim dives into international protests occurring around the world right now, specifically in Bangladesh.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to another weekend of legal review! Jim kicks off this week of Amicus: A Law Review with coverage of the recent proposals from the Biden/Harris Administration to tackle Supreme Court of the United States reforms.
Jim then touches on the legal status around the Guantanamo Bay terrorists and a mysterious payment involving the Egypt government of $10 million. To wrap up the weekend, Jim then touches on the 5th Circuit Court Voting Rights case and what it could mean going forward.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
With the Supreme Court term concluding earlier this month, Amicus: A Law Review with Jim Santelle takes a look at some of the proposals circulating around Supreme Court ethics reform. But before that, Jim tackles some of the hypothetical arguments that are being floated around in regards to legal challenges around elections now that Vice President Kamala Harris has become the presumptive Democratic nominee.
Then, in the second hour of Amicus, Jim discusses some of the legislative responses that are coming up around the country after the U.S. Supreme Court cases that were decided at the end of this past term. To conclude this weekend's show, Jim provides an update on the criminal cases that the Republican nominee Donald Trump is facing and likely cases surrounding transgender rights that the Supreme Court may take up in this next term.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Good morning! From the WAUK Studios, James Santelle kicks off the show with a tease of what is to come and then jumps into his recap of the Judge Aileen Cannon Case (U.S. v. Trump). Jim then turns to updates from the Supreme Court and what is next to come now that the most recent term has wrapped.
Starting off the second hour, Jim then gets into the Biden Administration's planned reforms for the Supreme Court, including potential term limits. Jim also takes calls and discusses a little bit more of what could come before the nation's highest court in there next term.
Jim then wraps the show with a discussion on Justice In Egypt & Russia and what is going on in Courts overseas.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
The U.S. Supreme Court term has come to an end. Join Jim Santelle for a breakdown of the remaining decisions announced by the Court, especially Trump v. United States that U.S. Presidents have immunity when it comes to official acts in their office. Jim discusses the ramifications of the case and takes callers throughout the second hour about what this means for the country.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to the second edition of Amicus: A Law Review with James Santelle for the weekend of June 29th and 30th! After a rapid fire week of U.S. Supreme Court rulings, Jim has prepared a bonus edition of Amicus: A Law Review for this weekend.
In this second of two editions of Amicus, Jim begins the breakdown of those court decisions with Fischer v. United States. After taking a deep dive into that case, Jim then begins discussing the case of Moyle v. United States which took up the issue of emergency abortion care in the state of Idaho. Jim Santelle then summarizes the James Snyder Bribe Case. In the second hour, Jim also tackles Harrington v. Purdue Pharma and the City of Grand Pass v. Johnson and then sets up where the show will go next week.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
Welcome to another edition of Amicus: A Law Review with James Santelle! After a rapid fire week of U.S. Supreme Court rulings, Jim has prepared a bonus edition of Amicus: A Law Review for this weekend. In this first of two editions of Amicus, Jim begins the breakdown of those court decisions with SEC v. Jarkesy.
Then, Amicus dives into Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency, and the Social Media Cases before the court. Jim concludes this first of two weekend editions of Amicus with commentary on the Supreme Court trends that the cases from this past week have continued.
To learn more about this show and all of the programming across the Civic Media network, head over to https://civicmedia.us/shows to see the entire broadcast line up. Follow the network on Facebook, X, YouTube and Instagram to keep up with Civic Media!
In this episode of Amicus, James Santelle dives into a critical analysis of recent Supreme Court decisions that are shaping the legal landscape of the United States. The episode begins with an in-depth discussion on the controversial ruling regarding bump stocks, where the Supreme Court struck down the Trump-era ban. This decision not only impacts gun regulations but also questions the authority of federal agencies like the ATF.
The conversation then shifts to the Supreme Court's unanimous decision on the abortion pill Mifepristone. This landmark ruling addresses the standing of plaintiffs and the intricate balance between federal authority and reproductive rights, ensuring the drug remains available despite ongoing legal battles. James Santelle provides insightful commentary on the implications of this decision for the future of abortion laws in America.
Finally, the episode takes a lighter yet significant turn as it explores the intellectual property case involving the phrase "Trump too small." This unanimous ruling delves into the nuances of trademark law, First Amendment rights, and the historical context of judicial decisions. James Santelle expertly navigates through the legal arguments and the broader implications of this ruling for free speech and political satire.
As the Supreme Court prepares to release decisions on 30 critical cases over the next few weeks, Jim provides an insightful preview of what these rulings might entail. From privacy rights and abortion to social media regulations and ethics in the judiciary, this episode promises to keep you informed on the legal landscape that shapes our society.
Jim also tackles the recent controversies involving Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, discussing the implications of undisclosed gifts and the need for judicial recusal in significant cases. Beyond the Supreme Court, the episode delves into high-profile trials, including those of Hunter Biden and Senator Robert Menendez, shedding light on their progress and potential outcomes.
Listeners will also hear about local legal developments, such as the felony charges against architects of the fake-electors scheme in Wisconsin. With Jim's thorough analysis and engaging commentary, this episode is a must-listen for anyone interested in the intersection of law, governance, and justice.
In this engaging episode of Amicus, the Law Review, host James Santelle delves into a pivotal week in the world of law and governance. The episode opens with a detailed discussion on the landmark criminal conviction of former President Donald Trump, dissecting the legal nuances and broader implications of the historic verdict. Listeners will gain insights into the trial's conduct, the roles of the prosecution and defense, and the critical thinking exemplified by the jury. Santelle emphasizes the significance of expertise in the legal system, offering a compelling narrative that underscores the importance of rule of law in maintaining justice and democracy.
The conversation shifts to a recent unanimous decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in NRA vs. Vullo. Santelle breaks down the Court's reasoning, highlighting Justice Sonia Sotomayor's opinion and its implications for First Amendment rights and government advocacy. This segment provides a clear understanding of the boundaries between free speech and coercion by state officials.
In the final segment, Santelle commemorates Pride Month by revisiting a significant legal milestone: the 10-year anniversary of the Wolf vs. Walker decision, which affirmed same-sex marriage rights in Wisconsin. Featuring an interview with plaintiffs Pam Klyce and Salud Garcia, the discussion explores their personal journey through the lawsuit, the challenges they faced, and the broader impact of their victory on LGBTQIA+ rights. This heartwarming segment celebrates their courage and highlights the ongoing struggle for equality and justice.
Join host James Santelle for another riveting show where the chaos of American politics is contained by Jim's wise words.
In this week's episode of Amicus Law Review, host James Santelle dives deep into the controversy surrounding Associate Justice Sam Alito. He kicks things off with a discussion on the ethics and implications of Justice Alito's recent actions, including the display of controversial flags and his cynical views on fundamental government institutions. This episode explores how Alito's behavior and statements may compromise the impartiality expected from a Supreme Court Justice.
Jim then shifts focus to the broader implications of these actions, drawing connections to landmark cases and recent decisions that highlight Alito's contentious positions. From the Voting Rights Act to the recent Dobbs decision, the episode unpacks the potential biases that may affect future rulings on critical issues such as social media, gun control, and presidential immunity.
In the second half, James delves into the latest Supreme Court ruling on gerrymandering in South Carolina. With a detailed analysis of the majority opinion penned by Justice Alito and the scathing dissent from Justice Kagan, he offers a thorough examination of the case's impact on racial and political gerrymandering. Listeners are invited to consider the broader implications for electoral integrity and judicial accountability. Join James for a compelling discussion on the future of justice in America.
On this Saturday's show, fearless host James Santelle explores two pivotal Supreme Court decisions: one affirming the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and another reinstating a congressional map in Louisiana, which includes a second majority-black district. These rulings highlight the court's stance on consumer rights and voting equality, respectively. Jim provides an in-depth analysis of these decisions and their broader implications for American jurisprudence.
Additionally, we examine the controversial upside-down flag incident at Justice Samuel Alito's residence, its significance in the context of current political tensions, and what it reveals about the justice's perspectives on government and law.
Finally, the episode covers the latest updates from the ongoing trials of high-profile figures such as former President Donald Trump and Senator Bob Menendez. Jim breaks down the testimonies, legal strategies, and potential outcomes of these landmark cases.
Throughout the broadcast, James delves into the concept of "Amicus Curiae" – a legal mechanism where individuals or organizations, not directly involved in a case, provide courts with information and insights that may influence judicial decisions. This episode explains the pivotal role these contributions play in shaping legal outcomes, particularly in cases involving broad public interests such as civil rights and human rights. By integrating historical context and contemporary relevance, James elucidates the strategic importance of these interventions in American jurisprudence and beyond.
As James engages with listeners, he outlines the ambitions of "Amicus" to serve as a bridge between complex legal concepts and civic engagement. With a commitment to enhancing community understanding and participation in legal matters, the show invites listeners to view themselves as "friends of the court" – informed, involved, and influential in the legal landscape. This episode is not just a transition in name but a recommitment to empowering the audience with knowledge and insight into the legal systems that shape their rights and responsibilities.
In this gripping episode of Amicus, host Jim Santelle dives into the landmark Supreme Court case, Trump vs. United States, examining the unprecedented arguments surrounding presidential immunity from prosecution. Santelle, with his astute legal insight, unfolds the complexities of this case, discussing the potential ramifications for the rule of law and democratic governance in America. The episode doesn't just highlight the legal arguments but also taps into the societal and political undercurrents that make this case a defining moment in U.S. history.
Santelle's narration brings to life the intense courtroom drama, where the nation's top justices grapple with constitutional precedents versus modern-day legal interpretations. The episode further explores how this case could reshape the understanding of presidential powers and responsibilities, challenging long-standing legal norms. With expert analysis and a compelling narrative, Santelle ensures listeners grasp the gravity of the proceedings and their possible impact on the future of the presidency.
Moreover, the podcast delves into the broader implications of the court's decision, engaging listeners with scenarios of how this could influence future presidential conduct and accountability. Santelle encourages a robust dialogue, urging the audience to consider the balance of powers, the role of the judiciary, and the essence of democratic accountability. This episode is not just a legal review; it's a call to civic awareness and participation in the ongoing discourse about justice and leadership in the United States.
At long last, the team behind Civic Media's Morning Cannolis is proud to announce the launch of our new show - Amicus: A Law Review with Attorney James Santelle! With no time wasted on his own ego, James is eagerly waiting to introduce you to the new layout as well as get you up to date on the latest in law across America. Take a listen!
In this thought-provoking episode, we dive deep into the intricate web of legal battles ensnaring former President Donald Trump, spanning from the bustling courts of Manhattan to the pressing concerns in Georgia and Florida. Join Jim as he meticulously dissects the recent developments in these high-profile cases, offering a riveting narrative that not only captures the essence of these legal proceedings but also the broader implications for the rule of law and justice in America.
The episode begins with an insightful analysis of the delayed trial in the so-called hush money case in Manhattan, shedding light on the last-minute discovery of a trove of documents and its impact on the trial's timeline. As we journey further south, the spotlight shifts to Georgia, where Jim offers a masterful breakdown of the challenges facing the prosecution team led by Fani Willis, amidst a swirling controversy over internal dynamics and their potential influence on the case's integrity.
In the final leg of our legal tour, we explore the Mar-a-Lago documents case in Florida, unraveling the complexities surrounding the alleged mishandling of sensitive documents. Throughout the episode, Jim not only provides a rich analysis of these legal battles but also contextualizes their significance against the backdrop of America's judicial landscape, inviting listeners to ponder the intricate relationship between power, politics, and the pursuit of justice.
This episode delves into the Supreme Court's latest ruling, setting the stage for a comprehensive analysis of its implications on the political and judicial landscapes. Jim Santelle expertly navigates the intricate details of the Court's decision, focusing on the legal reasoning behind the unanimous judgment and the dissenting opinions, providing listeners with a clear understanding of the complex legal principles at play. Through engaging discussions, the episode illuminates the potential impacts of the ruling on future electoral processes and the broader quest for justice, offering a unique perspective on the balance of power between state and federal authorities. Special attention is given to the interplay of legal arguments, historical context, and the justices' perspectives, making this episode a must-listen for anyone interested in the dynamics of American jurisprudence and its effects on the fabric of democracy.
Dive deep into the pivotal Supreme Court rulings that are shaping the future of American democracy in this compelling episode of Morning Canollis with James Santelle. Explore the intricate legal battles faced by Donald Trump, the clash between state and federal powers over social media, and the contentious debate surrounding bump stocks. James Santelle provides an unparalleled analysis of how these legal decisions extend beyond the courtroom, influencing every facet of American life and governance.
Unpack the complexities of presidential immunity, election laws, and the regulatory challenges of our digital age. With Santelle's expert commentary, listeners will gain a nuanced understanding of the current legal landscape and its implications for civil liberties and justice. This episode is not just for legal enthusiasts but anyone keen on grasping the profound impact of the judiciary on societal norms and individual rights.
Engage with a narrative that brings to light the significance of recent Supreme Court decisions and their broader societal implications. Through James Santelle's insightful discussions, this episode promises a thought-provoking journey into the heart of America's legal system. Whether you're a seasoned legal professional or a curious mind looking to understand the intricacies of law and its influence on our daily lives, this episode is a must-listen.
Join James Santelle in a captivating episode of Morning Canolis, where the vibrant heart of Wisconsin's community, law, and tradition unfolds. This episode takes you through a journey across various facets of Wisconsin's societal pulse, from the fervor of the American Birkebeiner ski race in Cable and Hayward to the intricate legal debates echoing in Alabama's courts. Delve into discussions that span the historical roots of the Birkebeiner, reflecting on its deep-seated values of courage and resilience, and navigate through the complexities of recent legal rulings that challenge and redefine principles of justice and humanity.
Listeners are invited to explore the multifaceted impact of these topics, from economic implications to philosophical and ethical inquiries, shedding light on how local traditions and national legal decisions intertwine with the fabric of American society. This episode is a must-listen for those intrigued by the dynamic interplay between culture, law, and community engagement, offering insightful reflections on the significance of preserving historical legacies while confronting contemporary legal challenges.
Jim Santelle leads off the top of today's broadcast with a focus on recent legal developments involving Donald Trump, including a detailed discussion on the financial implications of legal judgments against him. Santelle explores the complexities of Trump's financial obligations and the potential impact on his assets, offering a nuanced perspective on the legal and financial strategies in play.
The episode also touches on the broader implications of these legal battles, including the role of the attorney general's office and the challenges Trump faces in securing bonds for appeal processes. Through interviews and listener call-ins, Santelle and his guests dissect the multifaceted aspects of these cases, providing listeners with a comprehensive understanding of the legal landscape. The show encourages audience engagement, inviting listeners to share their views and questions, adding a dynamic and interactive element to the broadcast.
Today's show serves as a critical platform for discussing the implications of high-profile legal cases, highlighting the intersection of law, finance, and politics. Santelle's expertise and the participation of informed guests make the show a valuable resource for listeners seeking to navigate the complexities of current affairs. Through detailed analysis and engaging discussion, the episode exemplifies the show's commitment to informing and involving its audience in the critical issues of the day.
In today's episode, James Santelle dissects the ongoing legal battles surrounding former President Donald J. Trump and the intricate web of court decisions that could have profound implications for the future of American democracy.
James kicks off the discussion by diving into the contentious issue of presidential immunity. As outlined in recent court proceedings, including the Colorado case, the question of whether sitting presidents are immune from prosecution has become a focal point of debate. Host James Santelle unpacks the potential consequences of these legal battles, highlighting the delicate balance between executive power and accountability.
Our callers weigh in on the United States v. Fisher case, which centers on Joseph Fisher's challenge to an obstruction of an official proceeding charge related to the Capitol riot. With parallels to Trump's own indictment, this case raises fundamental questions about the rule of law and the accountability of individuals involved in insurrectionary acts. Santelle and callers dissect the nuances of the legal arguments and speculate on the potential outcomes, underscoring the far-reaching implications for the broader political landscape.
The conversation takes a sobering turn as we examine Special Counsel Jack Smith's efforts to protect witness safety in the classified document case. Santelle and his callers express grave concerns about the repercussions of unsealing sensitive documents, particularly in light of recent threats made against potential witnesses. They explore the legal standards at play and the potential ramifications for the integrity of the judicial process.
Finally, the episode concludes with a reflection on the recent decision not to prosecute President Joe Biden, amidst allegations of willful misconduct. Santelle and his guests delve into the importance of upholding professionalism and adhering to standard Department of Justice protocols, while cautioning against the politicization of legal proceedings.
Welcome to Morning Canolli, your go-to podcast for a deep dive into the legal landscape of America. In our latest episode, host Jim Santel and producer Johnny unravel the intricate threads of the nation's legal tapestry. We explore pivotal Supreme Court cases, delving into the intersection of the internet and social media, addressing gun control issues, and examining affirmative action in universities.
This week's episode also sheds light on the heated immigration battle between the Biden administration and Texas Governor Greg Abbott, with potential Supreme Court involvement looming large. Our legal journey continues with anticipation building around a judge's imminent decision in a case involving valuations by Donald Trump, spearheaded by the New York Attorney General. We dissect Trump's response to the recent defamation case, exploring his plans for an appeal and scrutinizing the judge involved.
But that's not all – our podcast takes a comprehensive look at recent sentences, a major national security compromise involving a CIA employee, and criminal charges against parents in a tragic mass shooting case. Jim Santel wraps up the episode with a glimpse into the future, highlighting potential upcoming events in the courts and emphasizing the busy legal week ahead. Join us on Morning Canolli for an engaging and informative exploration of the legal intricacies shaping the nation.
Welcome to another insightful episode of "Morning Cannolis" with your host, James Santelle. In this episode, we delve into critical legal matters shaping our world. Beginning with a landmark decision from the International Court of Justice, we explore the interim ruling directing Israel to take action to prevent acts of genocide in Gaza. Join us as we analyze the implications and reactions surrounding this significant international legal development.
Shifting gears, we turn our attention to a recent decision in a U.S. federal district court in New York, where former President Donald Trump has been found responsible for defamation. James Santelle breaks down the jury's decision and discusses its potential impact on other legal battles involving Trump.
Our legal journey continues with updates on various court proceedings, including a look at the DC Court of Appeals, a Colorado case addressing Trump's presence on the Republican primary ballot, and insightful discussions on the death penalty in America. Santelle navigates the intricacies of the Eighth Amendment and recent court decisions, shedding light on the evolving landscape of capital punishment.
Stay tuned for a closer examination of a pending case in the U.S. Supreme Court that could significantly impact the criminal prosecution of Donald Trump. Join James Santelle on "Morning Cannolis" as he unravels the complexities of the legal world and its profound implications on our lives.
Today, James Santelle looks one year into the future at the upcoming 2024 presidential election, where candidates Joseph Biden and Donald Trump are poised to face off again.
Jim takes a deep dive into two pivotal news stories that have captured the nation's attention. Firstly, the shocking results of a long-term Department of Justice investigation into the tragic shooting at Uvalde, Texas, in May 2022. Highlighting the failure of law enforcement in responding to the incident, he dissects the findings, emphasizing the importance of due process and the pursuit of justice in such critical situations.
In addition to the Uvalde case, Santelle turns his focus to a major Supreme Court case that threatens to reshape the future of federal agencies and their operations.
Welcome to Morning Cannolis with Jim Santelle! In this week's episode, Jim dives deep into the world of law, government, and the pursuit of justice in America. Broadcasting on WAUK Radio, Jim brings you a thought-provoking agenda that combines academic rigor with civic awareness.
Join Jim as he explores significant news events, unraveling the complexities behind what happened and why it matters. From international cases in Israel and Chile to the heart of the United States political campaigns, Morning Cannolis covers it all. The show's syllabus is an ambitious journey through the rule of law, justice, and the nuances of pivotal trials.
In the first segment, Jim sheds light on major trials making headlines, including the recently concluded civil fraud trial in New York and the intriguing case of E Jean Carroll, the former president. Delve into the regulations governing corporations in the Big Apple and the implications for executive immunity under the Constitution.
Moving into the second hour, the focus shifts to the aftermath of the assault on democracy – the January 6 attack on the Capitol. Jim explores one of the 1,200 prosecutions, specifically the case of the Imantana fire chief involved in the riot. The federal criminal justice system takes center stage as the show dissects the ongoing legal battles.
Jim Santelle's Saturday morning show is more than just news commentary; it's a journey into the heart of justice and democracy. By examining these cases and their broader implications, Morning Cannolis aims to empower listeners to take action on issues affecting their lives in Wisconsin and beyond. Tune in for a compelling blend of insights, analysis, and a call to action.
James Santelle kicks off the new year with a reflection on the somber anniversary of our nation's near-upheaval in 2021 during the January 6th insurrection. As the long-lasting effects and the ongoing trials loom large over the upcoming election, James offers priceless insights into law, order, and that which really governs our nation.
Join James Santelle in this cumulative episode after a long year in the realm of law, order, and justice, with an already ambitious year ahead.
It seems that every day Jim's not on air, world shattering news comes out. Thankfully, James Santelle comes to us for 2 hours each week to catch you up on all the happenings in the wild worlds of law, order, and justice.
In today's onslaught - Trump's been taken off the ballot in Colorado, fair maps have been put on the docket in Wisconsin, and the future under a second Trump administration if such a thing could come to pass.
Join the insightful James Santelle, and his dedicated producer, Anya, for the 76th edition of Morning Cannoli! In this episode, we dive deep into the heart of crucial news stories, events, and happenings that shape the landscape of law and government.
This morning, we unravel the basic truths behind the headlines that animate our lives and livelihoods. Jim Santelle dissects the fundamental question: What happened with Rudy Gulianni? What will happen next if he and others indicted at present continue to disregard the law? Get ready for a compelling exploration of the latest news stories and their impact on our society.
🎧 Tune in and Stay Informed: Start your morning right with Morning Cannoli - the civic media show that empowers you to navigate the complexities of our world. Don't miss out on the conversation, the insights, and the call to action. Subscribe now and be part of the informed citizenry!
Welcome to another engaging episode of Morning Cannolis with your host, James Santelle! In this two-hour powerhouse session, James delves into crucial global affairs during the first hour, offering insightful commentary on Russian war crimes and providing an in-depth analysis of the current state of the war in Ukraine.
In the second hour, buckle up for an intriguing program as James unpacks the enigmatic "2025 plan" – a compilation of the audacious statements made by Donald Trump about his potential actions if elected.
From international affairs to political intrigue, "Morning Cannolis" delivers a dynamic blend of information and analysis that keeps you informed and entertained throughout the entire two-hour broadcast.
In the first hour of the show, host Jim Santelle discusses the impact of the first woman to be appointed to the US Supreme Court, Sandra Day O'Connor, as well as how the recent decisions of the modern Court have affected her legacy. In the second hour, Jim gives an update on the status of Donald Trump's legal woes and briefs the listeners on important cases coming up before the end of the year.
James Santelle joins us on this Thanksgiving weekend to extend a touching tribute to Rosalind Carter, a monumental figure alongside her husband Jimmy in the world of Eco-activism, policy, and frankly, making the world better.
The resounding question is always asked when James Santelle speaks on the on-going injustices of our world and nation: What can we do? That and more answered today on Morning Canollis.
Domestic Violence, Gun Violence and Judges' Ethics. All these topics and more are in the hands of the Supreme Court. Taking their responses and decisions into his hands on our behalf is James Santelle, former US Attorney for SE Wisconsin, to explain, deliberate, and take your questions today on Morning Canollis.
Join James Santelle for an insightful discussion in this special prerecorded episode, where we delve into this week's litany of issues in the US and beyond. James Santelle provides a thoughtful perspective on the issue of antisemitism at Cornell University, shedding light on this important subject. He also discusses the ongoing Sam Bankman Fried and FTX Cryptop "conspiracy" case, as Jim has taken to calling it. Furthermore, we discuss Tyree Nichols' ongoing wrongful death suit, delving into the complexities and implications surrounding this case. Tune in to gain valuable insights and engage in a respectful dialogue on these crucial issues.
There's a lot to cover this week as new rulings and more cases are added to the mounting national docket, but James Santelle is here to clear it!
Jim begins the hour discussing updates from the Middle East and the war between Israel and Hamas, along with a midwestern connection. Then the morning turns to updates in the legal challenges facing former President Donald Trump. Listeners share their questions on several legal aspects Jim discusses. Finally, the show covers updates going on in the election racketeering case ongoing in Georgia.
War rages in Israel, Palestine, Russia, Ukraine, and across the globe. The impending choices of 14th amendment cases draws nearer. In 13 months, there will be another presidential election. It's only early October, but things are pretty scary already here on Morning Cannolis.
In a rare, prerecorded episode, James Santelle is covering the most pressing matters regarding the Trump Family's status as New York Buisness owners, ADA testing trials and more.
🎙️ Welcome to "Morning Cannolis" with your host, James Santelle! In this episode, we're diving deep into the currents of current affairs to bring you a captivating blend of stories that matter.
First up, we dissect the ongoing Alabama redistricting case, unpacking the intricate web of politics and democracy. James Santelle offers sharp insights and expert analysis to help you navigate this crucial issue.
Then, we shift gears to explore a decades-long mystery: the arrest of the man responsible for the murder of Tupac Shakur 24 years ago. Join us as we peel back the layers of this captivating story, revealing the shocking revelations and lingering questions.
Finally, we pay tribute to the late Senator Diane Feinstein, whose impactful career has left an indelible mark on American politics. James reflects on her legacy and explores the implications of her passing.
By this time next week, the Federal Government may be forced to shut down. Why? I don't know, I'm just a podcast description. James Santelle is the one with all the information, you should listen to him tell you!
Getting back to the weeks major issues, including the charges against Hunter Biden, the happenings of Trump's cases, and more.
After several huge sentences come down on even more Jan 6th rioters, James Santelle is break down their meanings, the terms, and the reactions of the plaintiffs now that Trump’s support seems to have waned.
Georgia, DC, Germany, Milwaukee. Across the world, justice is afoot. James Santelle is here to bring it all together.
Jim. is. BACK! And better than ever, if you can believe it. All your requests for him to cover the insane last two weeks of news have been answered!
We might be prerecorded, but we’re no phoning it in. James Santelle is back with some of the hardest hitting news America has faced since we came to air. Tune in!
Hall and Oates tried to warn you: Private Eyes, they are watching you. At least, if you’re the former president Donald Trump. This is just a place holder until Jim writes the far more elegant write-up, but in the meantime listen to this episode of Morning Cannoli’s to get up-to-date on the everchanging state of […]
No one seems interested in getting the Supreme Court justices to accept a code of ethics. No one, that is, except James Santelle, Attorney Extraordinaire, here to bring attention to the issue facing the United States through the lens of outcoming court decisions .
It’s Saturday in America, and you know what that means. It means former US Attorney James Santelle is catching you up on the Supreme Court, International Affairs, and the aftermath of January 6th Insurrection.
James Santelle wraps up this last month of Supreme Court rulings and more this week on Morning Cannoli’s.
A lot happened this week in the Supreme Court this week, and James Santelle is here to explain it all.
On the 1 year anniversary of the Dobbs decision James Santelle kicks off his round up of the important Supreme Court Cases currently before the court.
As perhaps one of the largest cases in the history of the US, or even the world, looms large, Jim Santelle stands ever-present to explain, extrapolate, and examine the indictment against former US President Donald J. Trump.
It’s been a full year of litigation, legality, and of course, Cannolis. Welcome to the 50th episode where Jim Santelle as always leads us through the most important legal topics of the moment.
This week, Jim Santelle is dedicated to providing an educational experience by revisiting past subjects and presenting new insights on Morning Canollis
James Santelle examines the issues of segregation from the Israeli Arab Conflict to Brown vs Board of Education,
James Santelle is back with another ambitious docket of world events to discuss with you. This week the discussions travel to the unrest in Pakistan, the mounting unrest in the United Kingdom, and right back here to the ever-relevant locale of Wisconsin.
This week, Jim Santell covers the latest in legal news, starting with the recently decided copyright case of Ed Sheeran’s “Thinking Out Loud” v. Marvin Gaye’s “Let’s Get It On”.
Jim covers the latest in legal disputes across the nation this week on Morning Cannolis.
Jim Santell continues his weekly syllabus this week with an astonishing number of callers from all parts of the political spectrum.
This week Jim recall’s the 2012 mass shooting at the Oak Creek Gurdwara and illuminates the meaning of Vaisakhi, the Sikh holiday of enlightenment.
Beginning this broadcast with another supremely “late breaking” story, our focusedexposition and in-depth analysis of two overtly “competing” decisions from thefederal courts—both affecting the broad right to privacy and its especiallyimportant application to reproductive/abortion rights: In the Northern District ofTexas, a trial judge finding inadequate, unsupported, and invalid the Food & DrugAdministration’s quarter-century-old decision approving […]
At the start of the broadcast, the first of what will be semi-regular segmentsfeaturing justice-focused news that, for various reasons, has not received the mediaand public attention that it rightly deserves—this week, turning our attention towhat millions of Israeli citizens have been and continue to pursue in their protestsagainst the anti-judicial proposals of the Prime […]
Beginning with an updating analysis of some among the many, diverse criminal investigations and civil actions involving former President Donald Trump—including the campaign “hush money” scheme of 2016 being pursued by the Manhattan District Attorney, the election fraud and voting interference efforts in Georgia being led by the Fulton County District Attorney, the $250 million […]
Broadcasting live from one of the state’s most important gatherings of civic leaders, advocates, and residents concerned about and motivated to act to protect the foundations of our free, embracing, and forward-looking society, another in the series of discussions of the important news items of our times—as understood through the informing lens of civics, law, […]
Beginning the last in a three-arc series focusing special attention on the actions and impacts of our Supreme Court is a brief examination of some of its historical and recent demographics—including the first Justices to diversify representation in the areas of race, gender, religion, and even age. Followed by reporting on the (still unaccomplished) creation […]
In this second of the three-arc series focusing special attention on the works and impacts of our Supreme Court—beginning with a brief historical review of some of the long-lasting traditions of it—the promised, extensive examination of two of the most important decisions in contemporary American history: Highlighting, first, the 2008 ruling (breaking with 200 years […]
[The First Segment in a Three-Part Arc Reporting on News of the High Court] In a modest departure from the usual broadcast format, the initial presentation and analysis of the works and impacts of our Supreme Court—beginning with an exposition of its foundations in Article III of the Constitution and a review of its early […]
Beginning with an extensive review of some major, country-defining events on this day in American history (that continue to reverberate and impact our 21st Century lives)—including the order by President Roosevelt to place in internment camps over 120,000 Americans of Japanese ancestry as the United States entered World War II against the Axis Powers. Then […]
Focusing on four major Rule of Law developments of this past week—beginning with the anticipated decision of a federal judge in Texas on whether a 22-year-old approval by the Food & Drug Administration of a well-tested and thoroughly reviewed abortion drug will stand, following the Supreme Court ruling last year eliminating a constitutional right to […]
Observing (among other, important Rule of Law events at this time in our history) the 20th anniversary of unfounded and misleading representations by a former Secretary of State about Saddam Hussein’s purported possession of “weapons of mass destruction” –leading to the invasion of Iraq and, three years later, my own volunteer assignment as the Justice […]
Devoting a full hour to exposition, analysis, understanding, and reaction to the tragic and horrifying murder of Tyre Nichols by five Memphis Police Officers in early January—including a graphic review of four videotapes of the stops, apprehensions, assaults, and beatings that led to the appropriate firings and state charges. Embedded in that examination, a prediction […]
Beginning the discussion with a review of our constitutional right to privacy, as first articulated clearly in 1965 and reaffirmed broadly until 2021, when the Supreme Court of the United States not only rescinded nearly 50 years of access to abortion but also placed in jeopardy many other fundamental privileges and prerogatives in the areas […]
With the headlines-grabbing news this week of the discovery of classified documents in the former office and current home of the President, a legal analysis of what we know and what we don’t, including the critical investigative questions in this (and any other “intent-focused”) inquiry—all affirming the fundamental notion that no one is above the […]
In the immediate aftermath of the selection of a Speaker of the House of Representatives in the new 118th Congress, a reflection on why the diverse responsibilities and professional operation of government, including the leadership of it, is critically important to the Constitutional legitimacy and vitality of our nation. And, two years after the attempted […]
Reflecting on many of the recent, significant stories in law, government, and justice, a whirlwind survey of five of the most important developments of late 2022—including the decision by the Supreme Court to continue the Trump era, pandemic-based regulation prohibiting asylum seekers from coming into America; the severe sentencings of two of the many defendants […]
Looking backward and forward to two major events of recent days—First, the anticipated findings of the House Committee on the January 6 Insurrection (including legislative recommendations and criminal referrals), coupled with the latest, high-profile sentencing of a Capitol Building rioter, a Congressional move under the Fourteenth Amendment to prevent former President Trump from holding federal […]
Beginning with both the warning and the hope of journalist Brian Williams about the future of the United States, an in-depth presentation on and analysis of the two, landmark oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court this week—the first on whether the discredited but still dangerous “independent state legislature theory” should be adopted and […]
Consistent with the adopted mission of the program to offer analysis and discussion of the major stories in law, government, and the aspiration for justice in America, we begin this week with an extended review of the content—and the equally-important language—of the landmark ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, […]
In ways obvious and discrete, explicit and implicit, the federal and state courts of America this week rejected two of the principal doctrines that have animated the litigation actions of Donald Trump—namely, that he is entitled to special treatment as a former President, including serial delays in the otherwise routine delivery of justice: From the […]
On a day when America recalls the stirring words of Abraham Lincoln in dedication of the National Cemetery at the Gettysburg Battlefield 159 years ago, describing and discussing the contemporary applications of his Rule of Law-inspiring message: First, witnessed in two major appointments of this past week—namely, the selection of former federal trial Judge Barbara […]
For the second week in a row, a survey and analysis of some of the breathtaking goings-on in our nation’s tribunals—including the freezing of Alex Jones’ financial assets to prevent their looting, the stunning testimony of Stewart Rhodes in his continuing trial for seditious conspiracy, and the appointment of an impartial monitor to ensure that […]
At the start, judges both federal and state presiding over criminal and civil proceedings from coast to coast in the United States—including the seditious conspiracy trial of the Oath Keepers in Washington, D.C., the criminal fraud prosecution of the Trump companies in New York City, the punitive damages proceeding against Alex Jones in Connecticut, the […]
After another week of breathtaking events and landmark decisions inside and outside our nation’s courts right prompts the question: “What are we to make of these seemingly related news stories that also change who we are and what we will be in America?” Among the blizzard of topics for analysis—stunning decisions by a single federal […]
In the whirlwind days of this past business week, our federal courts at all levels have continued to issue decisions affecting who we are and what we will be as Americans: Among the many judicial rulings that have rightly attracted headlines are the rejection by the United States Supreme Court of an emergency application to […]
Focusing on three of the most significant news developments in the areas of law,government, and the aspiration for justice in America, what special insights andpractical perspectives should we glean from: first, the gradual but unmistakablemovement of the federal appellate courts toward rebuking former President Trumpin his challenges to the criminal investigation of the Mar-a-Lago documentsmatter; […]
Invoking his delegated authority under Section 2 of the Constitution, the Presidentthis past week twice granted pardons and clemency to groups of people—for verydifferent reasons, under very different circumstances. How should we understandthese decisions to commute the sentences of convicted felons to secure the returnof Americans imprisoned in a foreign country and, unrelated, to pardon […]
in the first hour, Jim talks about this day in history, reviews the case of classified documents at Mar-A-Lago, and begins a discussion on pardons in the United States. In hour 2, Jim continues his examination of pardons in the American government before previewing the upcoming Supreme Court hearings.
On a day when our nation remembers and commemorates the 65th anniversary ofthe presidentially-directed and militarily-accomplished racial integration of theLittle Rock High School in segregationist Arkansas, contemporary news about thepromotion of and victory for the Rule of Law in America also rightly attractsattention: Based on an in-depth review and careful analysis of this week’slandmark decision […]
Jim examines the role of courts in America through the lens of contemporary cases, including the R. Kelly prosecution and the seizing of documents at Mar-A-Lago. Continuing his discussion of courts in society, Jim takes a look at Gibson’s Bakery v. Oberlin College, the Surfside Condominium collapse, and more.
The genesis, development, and establishment of a Labor Day observance in American in the late 19th Century tells us a lot about the important, historic role of the labor movement, its leadership, and, most important, the workers who animated it. Two recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court involving the dues-based, representative power of […]
Jim breaks down the legality and implications of the recently released affidavit in connection to the documents seized from former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence.
Thanks for tuning into Morning Canoli’s with Jim Santelle! Jim is Devil Radio’s resident Legal Eagle and a former U.S. Attorney, join us to hear his takes on the precarious situation we find ourselves in as a Nation. Can the rule of law prevail? Call or Text the show on Saturdays between 9am and 11 […]
Thanks for tuning into Morning Canoli’s with Jim Santelle! Jim is Devil Radio’s resident Legal Eagle and a former U.S. Attorney, join us to hear his takes on the precarious situation we find ourselves in as a Nation. Can the rule of law prevail? Call or Text the show on Saturdays between 9am and 11 […]
Thanks for tuning into Morning Canoli's with Jim Santelle!
Jim is Devil Radio's resident Legal Eagle and a former U.S. Attorney, join us to hear his takes on the precarious situation we find ourselves in as a Nation.
Can the rule of law prevail?
Call or Text the show on Saturdays between 9am and 11 am @ 844-697-2789
Thanks for tuning into Morning Canoli's with Jim Santelle!
Jim is Devil Radio's resident Legal Eagle and a former U.S. Attorney, join us to hear his takes on the precarious situation we find ourselves in as a Nation.
Can the rule of law prevail?
Call or Text the show on Saturdays between 9am and 11 am @ 844-697-2789
Thanks for tuning into Morning Canoli's with Jim Santelle!
Jim is Devil Radio's resident Legal Eagle and a former U.S. Attorney, join us to hear his takes on the precarious situation we find ourselves in as a Nation.
Can the rule of law prevail?
Call or Text the show on Saturdays between 9am and 11 am @ 844-697-2789
Thanks for tuning into Morning Canoli's with Jim Santelle!
Jim is Devil Radio's resident Legal Eagle and a former U.S. Attorney, join us to hear his takes on the precarious situation we find ourselves in as a Nation.
Can the rule of law prevail?
Call or Text the show on Saturdays between 9am and 11 am @ 844-697-2789
Thanks for tuning into Morning Canoli's with Jim Santelle! Jim is Devil Radio's resident Legal Eagle and a former U.S. Attorney, join us to hear his takes on the precarious situation we find ourselves in as a Nation Can the rule of law prevail?
Call or Text the show on Saturdays between 9am and 11 am @ 844-697-2789
Thanks for tuning into Morning Canoli's with Jim Santelle! Jim is Devil Radio's resident Legal Eagle and a former U.S. Attorney, join us to hear his takes on the precarious situation we find ourselves in as a Nation Can the rule of law prevail?
Call or Text the show on Saturdays between 9am and 11 am @ 844-697-2789