I am Dr. Bishnu Subedi. I am a cardiologist in the United States. In the era of evidence-based medicine, our practice is usually guided by a scientific study, expert society statements, or clinical guidelines. In this podcast series, I intend to highlight some of these practice-changing articles in the field of cardiology from past and present.
The REDUCE-AMI trial showed no significant benefit of beta-blockers in reducing all-cause mortality or future myocardial infarction in patients with acute myocardial infarction and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
The trial included 5,020 patients who were randomized to either beta-blockade with metoprolol or bisoprolol or usual care, with follow-up over a median of 3.5 years.
Primary and secondary outcomes showed no significant differences between the beta-blocker and usual care groups.
Safety outcomes were similar between groups, and there was significant crossover and varying adherence to beta-blocker therapy over time.
The findings suggest a need to re-evaluate the routine use of beta-blockers in this patient population, emphasizing personalized treatment approaches and further research.
The HF-OPT study investigated the improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) beyond 90 days in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
In this prospective, multicenter observational study, 1,300 patients with HFrEF (LVEF ≤35%) were initially enrolled.
Participants wore a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) and received guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT).
LVEF was measured at 0, 90, 180, and 360 days.
By day 90, 46% had an LVEF >35%; this increased to 68% by day 180 and 77% by day 360.
High GDMT usage was noted, with 97% on beta-blockers, 94% on ACE inhibitors/angiotensin-receptor blockers/ARNI, and 62% on mineralocorticoid antagonists by day 180.
Achieving target doses of all three GDMT classes was associated with significant LVEF improvement.
The study recorded low rates of ventricular arrhythmias beyond the initial 90 days.
These results underscore the potential benefits of continuous GDMT optimization. They suggest that delayed implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation may be reasonable for selected patients, allowing for further LVEF improvement.
This emphasizes the importance of optimal dosing and continuous GDMT for effective heart failure management, highlighting the need for expedited GDMT titration and a tailored approach to heart failure care.
Reference: European Heart Journal, ehae334, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae334
Reference: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jun, 83 (24) 2472–2486
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
2024 HCM Guidelines Focus on Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors and Exercise
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key Points:
Positive Aspects of DOACs: DOACs are acknowledged for their convenience, efficacy, and safety in conditions like atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). The review supports their use in stroke prevention, AF, recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), valve disease (with exceptions), VTE management, cancer-associated thrombosis, stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and peripheral-artery revascularization.
Conditions Where DOACs Are Not Recommended: DOACs are cautioned against in specific medical settings, including mechanical heart valves, rheumatic AF, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), embolic stroke of undetermined cause (ESUS), left ventricular assist devices, heart failure with reduced LV systolic function without AF, and thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
Areas of Uncertainty and Need for Research: The paper identifies areas where the benefit of DOACs remains uncertain due to a lack of dedicated trials or inconclusive results. These include left ventricular thrombus, catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis (DVT), cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and splanchnic vein thrombosis. The need for further research, especially in catheter-induced DVT, is emphasized.
Reference: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jan, 83 (3) 444–465
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Background: Traditional practice requires fasting before cardiac catheterization, but there's no evidence to support it.
Objective: This study compared a heart-healthy pre-procedure diet with fasting to determine best practices.
Methods: 197 patients were randomly assigned to either a heart-healthy diet or fasting before their cardiac catheterization.
Results:
Satisfaction: Patients on the heart-healthy diet were significantly more satisfied than those who fasted.
Symptoms: Those in the diet group reported less thirst and hunger before and after the procedure.
Safety: No difference in complications (pneumonia, aspiration, intubation, hypoglycemia) was observed between groups.
Other outcomes: Fatigue, glucose levels, gastrointestinal issues, and antiplatelet medication doses were similar between groups.
Conclusion: Providing a heart-healthy diet before cardiac catheterization is safe and improves patient satisfaction without increasing complications.
Future Considerations:
Larger, multicenter studies are encouraged to validate and replicate these findings.
The study prompts a reconsideration of fasting protocols for other procedural situations beyond cardiac catheterization.
Reference Link: https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024115
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key Points
In patients not taking antianginal meds, PCI alleviated some—but not all—symptoms
Background:
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is commonly used to alleviate stable angina symptoms.
Uncertainty exists regarding whether PCI is more effective than a placebo procedure in patients not using antianginal medication.
Methods:
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled PCI trial was conducted in stable angina patients.
Patients underwent a 2-week symptom assessment phase after stopping antianginal medications.
Randomized 1:1, patients received either PCI or a placebo, with a 12-week follow-up.
The primary endpoint was the angina symptom score, calculated based on daily angina episodes, antianginal medications, and clinical events.
Results:
301 patients were randomized (151 PCI, 150 placebo), with a mean age of 64 and 79% men.
Ischemia was present in 80% of one cardiac territory, 17% in two, and 2% in three territories.
At 12 weeks, the mean angina symptom score was significantly lower in the PCI group (2.9) than in the placebo group (5.6).
The odds ratio for improved scores with PCI was 2.21 (95% CI, 1.41 to 3.47; P<0.001).
One patient in the placebo group had unacceptable angina leading to unblinding.
Acute coronary syndromes occurred in 4 patients in the PCI group and 6 in the placebo group.
Conclusions:
In stable angina patients not using antianginal medication and with objective evidence of ischemia, PCI resulted in a lower angina symptom score compared to a placebo procedure.
Indicates an improved health status concerning angina following PCI.
Link to article:
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2310610
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Study: STRONG-HF trial examined rapid up-titration of heart failure medications (GDMT) after hospitalization.
Goal: Reach optimal GDMT doses within 2 weeks after discharge.
Findings:
Over 90% of patients achieved medium-to-high GDMT doses within 2 weeks.
Patients with lower blood pressure, more congestion, and higher risk markers received less up-titration.
Higher GDMT doses:
Associated with lower rates of readmission or death for heart failure within 6 months.
Led to greater improvements in quality of life.
Were safe and well-tolerated.
Implications:
Efforts should be made to quickly reach optimal GDMT doses for most patients after hospitalization for heart failure.
Individual factors like blood pressure and congestion may influence up-titration.
This approach offers potential benefits for improving outcomes and quality of life.
Note: This study focused on three main GDMT classes (RAAS inhibitors, beta-blockers, MRAs). Newer drugs like SGLT2 inhibitors were not included but might also benefit from early initiation. Further research is needed on their effectiveness in this context.
Link: doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4553
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key Points from "Treat to Target or With Intensity? Both Statin Tactics Cut MACE: LODESTAR":
The study compares two strategies for managing LDL cholesterol in coronary artery disease (CAD):
Treat-to-target: aiming for LDL levels between 50-70 mg/dL.
High-intensity statin: prescribing the highest tolerated statin dose regardless of LDL level.
Both strategies are equally effective in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) over 3 years:
MACE rate: 8.1% in treat-to-target vs. 8.7% in high-intensity statin (non-inferior).
No significant differences in individual components of MACE (death, MI, stroke, revascularization).
Treat-to-target achieved lower LDL levels initially but the gap closed by year 3.
Safety was similar between groups, but new-onset diabetes trended lower in treat-to-target.
Study limitations:
Open-label design (not blinded).
Limited use of combination therapy (e.g., ezetimibe) with statins.
Implications:
Treat-to-target offers an alternative to the "fire and forget" approach.
May be more patient-centered, allowing dose adjustment based on individual response.
Further research is needed on longer-term outcomes and lower LDL targets.
Additional points:
European guidelines recommend even lower LDL targets (<55 mg/dL) for high-risk patients.
Concerns remain about the potential side effects of high-intensity statin therapy.
Treat-to-target may offer a more cautious and personalized approach.
Link to article: doi:10.1001/jama.2023.2487
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key Points of the Study:
T-TEER with the TriClip device significantly improved health status in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) compared to medical therapy alone.
This improvement was seen in both the short-term (1 month) and long-term (1 year) after the procedure.
T-TEER patients were more likely to be alive and well (defined as good KCCQ score and no decline) at 1 year compared to those on medical therapy.
The benefit of T-TEER was greater for patients with lower baseline health scores (KCCQ).
The health status improvement after T-TEER was likely due to reduced TR and correlated with reduced mortality and heart failure hospitalizations.
In conclusion, T-TEER is a promising treatment for severe TR, leading to significant and sustained improvement in health status and quality of life for patients.
Link to article:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.008
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key Points from PROMISE 2 Trial:
•Problem: 20% of CLTI patients have no revascularization options, leading to amputations.
•Solution: Transcatheter arterialization of deep veins creates an artery-to-vein connection, delivering oxygenated blood to the ischemic foot and potentially preventing amputation.
•Study: Analyzed 105 patients with no other treatment options who underwent the procedure with LimFlow Device.
•Results:
oAmputation-free survival at 6 months: 66.1%, exceeding the 54% performance goal.
oLimb salvage: 76.0%.
oWound healing: 25% completely healed, 51% in progress.
oSafety: No unanticipated device-related adverse events.
•Conclusion: Deep-vein arterialization is a safe and effective option for no-option CLTI patients, offering limb salvage, wound healing, and improved survival.
Article Link: DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212754
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key Points from this trial:
The CLASP IID trial, the first randomized controlled trial comparing the PASCAL system and the MitraClip system in prohibitive-risk patients with significant symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), aimed to report primary and secondary endpoints along with 1-year outcomes for the full cohort.
In the study, 300 patients were randomized (PASCAL: n = 204; MitraClip: n = 96).
At 1 year, differences in survival, freedom from heart failure hospitalization, and major adverse events (MAE) were nonsignificant (P > 0.05 for all).
The PASCAL system demonstrated noninferiority to the MitraClip system for primary endpoints, with 30-day MAE rates of 4.6% vs. 5.4% and 6-month MR ≤2+ rates of 97.9% vs. 95.7%.
Noninferiority was also met for secondary effectiveness endpoints at 1 year, with MR ≤2+ rates of 95.8% vs. 93.8% and MR ≤1+ rates of 77.1% vs. 71.3%.
Both groups showed sustained improvements in functional classification and quality of life (P < 0.05 for all vs. baseline).
The results affirm the PASCAL system as a beneficial therapy for prohibitive-surgical-risk patients with significant symptomatic DMR.Link to article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.002
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key points of the DANPACE II study on atrial pacing and atrial fibrillation in sinus node dysfunction:
•46% of patients regardless of pacing rate (40bpm or 60bpm) experienced an AF episode lasting over 6 minutes during 2 years.
•No difference in AF rates across age, heart rhythm patterns, or prior AF history.
•Some patients initially assigned to 40bpm required device reprogramming to a higher rate due to these issues.
•Rate-adaptive pacing adjusts to activity level, providing adequate heart rate while minimizing unnecessary atrial pacing.
•Future studies are needed to identify specific patient groups who might benefit from atrial pacing minimization.
•While minimizing atrial pacing isn't generally effective for preventing AF, the study provides valuable insights for optimizing pacemaker settings to ensure patient safety and well-being.
Link to article: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad564
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Major Trends:
Additional Notes:
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key Points of Coronary Artery Disease Studies in 2023:
•ORBITA-2: Confirmed PCI's role in relieving angina symptoms for stable patients.
•SELECT: Semaglutide (Ozempic) reduced cardiovascular events in overweight/obese patients with existing CVD.
•Left Main CAD Revascularization: Guidelines downgraded PCI to less strong recommendation for low-risk patients.
•ROMA-Women: Launched to study gender differences in CABG outcomes.
•New Chronic Coronary Disease Guidelines: Recommend SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists in select cases.
•REPRIEVE: Pitavastatin lowered cardiovascular risk in HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy.
•BIOVASC: Immediate PCI was safe and effective as staged procedures in ACS patients.
•Imaging Wars: ILLUMIEN IV showed a limited benefit of OCT, while RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI found value in complex cases.
•DAPT Duration: Studies suggest shorter regimens may be beneficial in certain patients.
•DAPA-MI: Mixed results for dapagliflozin in acute MI, but improved cardiometabolic outcomes.
•MINT: No harm seen with liberal transfusion strategy in anemic acute MI patients.
•Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor: Potential future breakthrough for LDL cholesterol control.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
A quick rundown of the key developments:
Trials:
Policy and Guidelines:
Other Highlights:
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Focus on Valves:
Challenges and Future Directions:
Overall, 2023 was a pivotal year for structural heart disease, with advancements in valve interventions and promise for future innovation.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key Highlights:
Overall:
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key Points of Endovascular Procedures and Devices in 2023:
FDA Actions:
CLTI Debate:
Other Developments:
Future Outlook:
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Heart Rhythm 2023: Innovations in Ablation, Devices, and Conduction System Pacing.
Catheter Ablation and LAAO Advance:
Medical Therapies: Mixed Bag:
Pacing and ICDs: Conduction System Pacing Takes Center Stage:
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key Points:
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key findings of the FRAIL-AF trial: * Switching from vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy was associated with an increased risk of major and clinically relevant bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 1.69, 95% CI 1.23-2.32). There was no difference in the risk of thromboembolic events between the two groups. The trial included 1,330 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were 75 years of age or older and had at least two of the following frailty criteria: * Self-reported difficulty walking 100 meters * Weight loss of >10% in the past year * Low physical activity * Low grip strength The trial was conducted in 26 centers in the Netherlands and lasted for a median of 2.4 years. The main author of the trial is Linda Joosten, MD, from the University Medical Center Utrecht in the Netherlands. The trial was published in the journal Circulation on September 1, 2023.Link to article: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066485--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Summary of the STEP-HFpEF trial 2023 published in Nature Medicine
Overall, the STEP-HFpEF trial showed that semaglutide is a promising treatment option for patients with the obesity phenotype of HFpEF. Semaglutide improved these patients' symptoms, physical limitations, exercise function, and reduced body weight. The magnitude of the benefit was directly related to the extent of weight loss.
Link to the article: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02526-x
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key points of the FIRE trial:
In conclusion, the study found that complete revascularization is beneficial in older patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. It is associated with a lower risk of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and any revascularization at 1 year.
Here are some additional details from the study:
The study findings support the use of complete revascularization in older patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. However, it is important to note that the study was conducted in a single center and the results may not be generalizable to all patients. Further research is needed to confirm the findings of this study.
Link to the article: DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300468
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
These are the key points from this 2023 ACC/AHA guideline in managing chronic coronary disease.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
The ATTRibute-CM trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of acoramidis in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). The trial enrolled 632 patients with symptomatic ATTR-CM. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either acoramidis 800 mg twice daily or a placebo for 30 months.
The trial's primary endpoint was a hierarchical analysis of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-related hospitalization, NT-proBNP, and 6-minute walk distance. The trial found that acoramidis was associated with a number of benefits compared to placebo, including:
Acoramidis was generally well-tolerated. The most common side effects were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
The results of the ATTRibute-CM trial suggest that acoramidis is an effective and safe treatment for ATTR-CM. Acoramidis is a potential alternative to tafamidis, the only other FDA-approved drug tafamidis for treating ATTR-CM.
Here are some additional details about the ATTRibute-CM trial:
The results of the ATTRibute-CM trial are a major step forward in the treatment of ATTR-CM. Acoramidis offers a new option for patients with this serious condition, and it is likely to be an important treatment option for many years to come.
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Key Points from ARREST trial findings:
Link to the reference article: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01351-X
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
Here is a summary of the key points from the 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of endocarditis:
Link to Reference article: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad193
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
This review highlights the following points: There are different ways to prevent blood clots in patients who have undergone LAAO for atrial fibrillation (AF). Taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) alone is associated with a lower risk of blood clots in the device and death than not taking any antithrombotic medication. For patients who are not at high risk of bleeding, taking a DOAC alone is likely the best way to prevent blood clots after LAAO. This is because it balances the risk of bleeding and blood clots.Link for the article: DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.010--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
The review article was published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology in August 2023 and was co-authored by Dr. Kyle Nelson, Dr. Valentin Fuster, and Dr. Paul Ridker. The review found that low-grade systemic inflammation, as determined by hsCRP, is a more powerful determinant of recurrent cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).The review also found that the recent randomized trials of the interleukin-1 inhibitor canakinumab and of the microtubule polymerization inhibitor low-dose colchicine provide evidence that inflammation inhibition safely lowers cardiovascular event rates among statin-treated patients with a magnitude of effect similar to if not greater than that of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, ezetimibe, and other adjunctive lipid-lowering agents.The review concluded that low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg po qd) is an effective and safe therapy for the secondary prevention of CAD. It is particularly beneficial for patients with high hsCRP levels.Reference Article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.055--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dr-bishnu-subedi/message
LM CAD treatment needs sophisticated decision-making. Recent clinical practice standards guide clinicians; however, treating individual individuals might be tough. Anatomy and physiology determine LM CAD manifestations. Recognizing the complexity of LM CAD, which rarely occurs alone and sometimes with multivessel disease, a treatment protocol using medical therapy alone or in combination with PCI or CABG is proposed. It is best to have a strategy for the heart team that takes into account clinical, procedural, operator, and institutional factors and uses collaborative decision-making to meet the needs and clinical situations of each patient.
Link to the original article:
https://www.jacc.org/doi/full/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.09.034
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109722070267?via%3Dihub
Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis in the General Population: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force, published in JAMA on February 2, 2021.
Link for the article: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2775704
The understanding, diagnosis, and treatment options for transthyretin (TTR) amyloid is rapidly evolving. American Heart Association published a statement titled "Cardiac Amyloidosis: Evolving Diagnosis and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association". I have tried to present the key elements of this article.
Link: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000792