Movie of the Year: Recent Episodes

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of KazakhstanThe Borat Podcast Phenomenon: Satire, Shock Value, and Staying PowerThe Borat podcast from Movie of the Year explores one of 2006's most controversial and talked-about films. Sacha Baron Cohen's mockumentary arrived as a cultural earthquake. Audiences had never seen anything quite like it. The film presented itself as a documentary following a fictional Kazakhstani journalist through America. In reality, it weaponized satire in ways that still provoke debate today. The Borat podcast episode digs into how Cohen achieved this effect. We examine the craft behind the chaos. Furthermore, we ask whether the shock value overshadowed the actual social commentary. Above all, this is a film that demands to be discussed.

About the FilmDirected by Larry Charles, Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan premiered at the 2006 Toronto International Film Festival. The Borat podcast traces the film's journey from festival premiere to cultural phenomenon. The film followed Borat Sagdiyev, a television reporter from Kazakhstan, as he traveled across the United States. Nominally, he was researching American culture. In practice, he spent the film creating uncomfortable, often hilarious interactions with unsuspecting Americans. The film was partially scripted and partially improvisational. Cohen's performance art approach meant that real people became unwitting participants in elaborate pranks. Consequently, the picture sparked immediate controversy about consent, cultural sensitivity, and the ethics of mockumentary comedy.

The film grossed over $260 million worldwide and became a cultural phenomenon virtually overnight. By contrast, most independent comedies barely reach a fraction of that audience. Learn more about Borat on IMDb, or read the full Wikipedia entry.

The Satire, the Method, and the Cultural ImpactAt its core, Borat operates as a Trojan horse. The film pretends to be a fish-out-of-water comedy. However, it's actually a scathing critique of American attitudes. The Borat podcast digs into this contradiction at length. Cohen's character exposes racism, sexism, and anti-Semitism by drawing them out of ordinary people. The satire works because audiences laugh before they realize what they're laughing at. Additionally, viewers must grapple with complicity. They enjoyed the comedy, yet that comedy often relies on humiliating real people. This tension is precisely the point.

The method behind Borat borrows heavily from Andy Kaufman's tradition of transgressive performance art. Cohen spent years developing the character before filming began. He remained in character between takes. Furthermore, he worked with a skeleton crew to maintain the documentary illusion. Most of the "interviewees" had no idea they were being filmed for a narrative feature. This approach blurs the line between documentary and fiction in unprecedented ways. Notably, it also raises serious ethical questions that the film itself never fully addresses. The cultural impact proved enormous. Within weeks, Borat became shorthand for a particular brand of boundary-pushing comedy. College students quoted the film constantly. Yet critics remained divided on whether the satire was sufficiently incisive or merely cruel.

The film's influence on comedy cannot be overstated. It opened doors for films like Brüno and The Dictator. Nevertheless, it also sparked a conversation about the ethics of pranking that continues today. By contrast, most comedies fade from cultural memory. Borat remains present in discourse because it asks uncomfortable questions.

IP Freely on the Borat Podcast: What If a 2006 Director Made a Marvel Movie?Here's a thought experiment: Imagine Larry Charles directing a Marvel property in 2006. The result would be radically different from what the MCU eventually became. Charles brings a documentary aesthetic and deep discomfort into every frame. He's drawn to morally ambiguous situations. Therefore, his Marvel film would prioritize character awkwardness over spectacle. Consider this scenario: Charles directs Iron Man in 2006 with a 2004-era approach to superhero casting. The tone would be satirical, maybe even mockumentary-styled. Robert Downey Jr.'s character would feel less like a hero and more like a flawed businessman uncomfortable with his own mythology.

Alternatively, picture Sacha Baron Cohen as a Marvel character in 2006. The studio would never allow his anarchic energy into their carefully controlled franchises. Yet imagine if they had. Cohen could have been a Thor-like character who doesn't understand Earth. His fish-out-of-water routine would align perfectly with fish-out-of-space storytelling. The scenes with other Avengers would crackle with uncomfortable tension. Baron Cohen thrives in social friction. A Marvel movie would provide an entire world of characters for him to destabilize. The result would feel more like a Kaufman film than anything in the MCU canon. Such a project would be too unpredictable for Marvel's brand management.

PopFilter Hall of FameThe Taste Buds inducted Borat into the PopFilter Hall of Fame. This honor recognizes films that transcend their moment and become part of pop culture permanently. Borat earned this status for several reasons. First, the film's central character became a recognizable reference point. People who never saw the movie know who Borat is. Moreover, the film demonstrated that mockumentary could be both commercially viable and culturally significant. Additionally, it showed that comedy could be provocative and still find a massive audience. Finally, the picture's impact on subsequent comedy filmmaking cannot be understated. Every awkward-comedy and cringe-comedy film since 2006 owes something to this picture's approach.

Hall of Fame status also reflects longevity. Rewatching Borat today feels different than it did in 2006. The film has aged in unexpected ways. Some jokes land harder because they reflect genuine changes in American discourse. Others feel more uncomfortable because our cultural standards have shifted. Specifically, the film's treatment of certain communities provokes more heated debate now. Nevertheless, the picture remains relevant. It remains a text people genuinely discuss in 2024. That staying power justifies Hall of Fame recognition.

Why Borat Still MattersFifteen years after its release, Borat remains essential viewing. The Borat podcast episode demonstrates this staying power. The film documents a specific moment in American history. The movie captures mid-2000s attitudes with uncomfortable clarity. Furthermore, it serves as a mirror. What the film reveals about American culture in 2006 says as much about us as viewers as it does about the people on screen. The picture represents peak mockumentary filmmaking. Few films since have matched its ability to make audiences simultaneously laugh and cringe.

Beyond its comedic achievements, Borat represents a risk-taking moment in mainstream cinema. The film was genuinely dangerous to make. Cohen and Charles put themselves in real physical danger. Moreover, they put others in uncomfortable situations without consent. This raises questions that remain unresolved. Can art justify its methods? When does comedy become cruelty? These aren't just academic questions. They're central to the film's power. Borat doesn't let audiences off easy. It forces us to think about what we're laughing at. Ultimately, that's why the film continues to matter. It demands engagement rather than passive consumption.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 2006* Movie of the Year 2006: Podcast Intro, Part 1 * Movie of the Year 2006: Bracket Reveal * 2006 Mixtape, Part 1 * All Movie of the Year episodes

FAQ: Borat Podcast and FilmWhat is the Borat podcast episode about?

The Borat podcast explores Sacha Baron Cohen's 2006 mockumentary as a work of satire, examining the methods Cohen used to expose American attitudes. The Borat podcast episode discusses the film's cultural impact, its boundary-pushing approach to comedy, and why it remains relevant today. The Borat podcast also features segments imagining a Marvel movie directed by the film's director Larry Charles, and we induct Borat into the PopFilter Hall of Fame.

What is the film Borat about?

Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan is a mockumentary that follows a fictional Kazakhstani journalist through the United States. The film presents itself as a documentary but is actually a carefully constructed satire designed to provoke reactions from real people. Sacha Baron Cohen's performance exposes uncomfortable truths about American culture through comedy.

Who directed Borat?

Larry Charles directed Borat. Charles is known for his work in television comedy and his willingness to embrace uncomfortable, transgressive humor. His directing style emphasizes awkwardness and documentary realism, both of which are central to Borat's impact. Charles has continued to work in provocative comedy since this film's release.

When was Borat released?

Borat premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival in September 2006 and received a wide theatrical release in November 2006. The film became an immediate cultural phenomenon, grossing over $260 million worldwide and sparking debate about satire, ethics, and comedy.

Why does Borat still matter?

Borat remains culturally significant for several reasons. First, it represents a high-water mark for mockumentary filmmaking. Second, the film continues to provoke conversations about satire, consent, and ethics in art. Third, rewatching the film today offers insights into mid-2000s American attitudes. Finally, its influence on subsequent comedy filmmaking cannot be overstated. The picture is both a document of its time and a timeless exploration of performance and identity.

Is Borat appropriate for all audiences?

No. Borat contains explicit sexual content, graphic language, and potentially offensive material throughout. The film is rated R and is designed for mature audiences. Furthermore, the film's satire can be uncomfortable intentionally. Viewers should expect to feel awkward and challenged by the content.

How did Borat become a cultural phenomenon?

Borat became a phenomenon through word-of-mouth and its shocking, transgressive approach. The film arrived in 2006 before most audiences expected mockumentary comedy to exist on such a scale. Social media amplified its reach. Furthermore, the character of Borat proved infinitely quotable. People who hadn't seen the film encountered references constantly. The film's controversy also contributed to its cultural penetration. As a result, Borat became unavoidable in popular discourse.

What is IP Freely?

IP Freely is a PopFilter recurring segment in which the Taste Buds imagine alternate versions of studio franchises. In this case, we consider what a Marvel movie made in 2006 by director Larry Charles might have looked like, or how Sacha Baron Cohen's approach to comedy might have intersected with superhero filmmaking. It's a thought experiment about director sensibilities, tone, and artistic vision.

What makes Borat different from other comedies?

Borat differs from most comedies because it uses real people in its comedy without their knowledge or consent. The film blurs the line between documentary and fiction intentionally. Moreover, Cohen remains in character throughout filming. Additionally, the satire targets systemic attitudes rather than individual characters. Most comedies are either scripted films or documentaries. Borat is neither and both simultaneously, which gives it a unique power.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006The Prestige (feat. Kenny McMillan from the Frame and Reference pod!)The Prestige Podcast: Nolan's Obsession with Magic, Ambition, and DeceptionThe Prestige podcast brings one of Christopher Nolan's most intricate achievements to the center of discussion. Released in 2006, The Prestige stands as a masterclass in misdirection—both thematically and narratively. On this episode of the The Prestige podcast, Ryan, Mike, and Greg explore how the film's structure itself becomes a magic trick, with Kenny McMillan from Frame and Reference offering cinematographic insight into Nolan's visual storytelling. This episode of The Prestige podcast examines why The Prestige has aged into a richer, more rewarding experience than initial audiences may have recognized.

About The PrestigeThe Prestige follows two rival magicians, Alfred Borden (Christian Bale) and Robert Angier (Hugh Jackman), whose competitive obsession spirals into tragedy and revenge. Set in Victorian London, the film weaves illusion, science, and sacrifice into a narrative that demands multiple viewings. Directed by Christopher Nolan from a screenplay by Jonathan Nolan and David S. Goyer, the film is based on Christopher Priest's 1995 novel. The cast includes Scarlett Johansson as the central illusion Olivia, Michael Caine as the mentor Cutter, and David Bowie in a pivotal role as inventor Nikola Tesla. The film explores the cost of ambition and the blurred line between performance and reality.

Nolan and Structure: How The Prestige Podcast Uncovers the Architecture of MisdirectionChristopher Nolan's approach to The Prestige mirrors the film's central conceit: the three-act structure of a magic trick. The exposition sets up the trick, the turning point misdirects the audience, and the prestige reveals the truth. Nolan employs this framework to build narrative tension that rewards attentive viewers. Moreover, the film's editing and pacing function as visual sleight of hand, concealing crucial details in plain sight. The director's command of chronology and revelation transforms structural mechanics into thematic content. Additionally, the cinematography by Hoyte van Hoytema reinforces this architecture through framing choices that obscure as much as they reveal. Consequently, viewers who dismiss the film on first viewing often discover entirely new dimensions upon rewatching—a quality that separates The Prestige from conventional period dramas.

Magic and Ambition: The Prestige Podcast Explores the Psychology of ObsessionAt its core, The Prestige interrogates the price of ambition through the lens of performance and sacrifice. The Prestige podcast digs into how both Borden and Angier pursue mastery of the transported man illusion, but their methods diverge fundamentally. Borden's sacrifice is existential; Angier's is technological. The film suggests that true magic—or true achievement of any kind—requires a willingness to lose something irreplaceable. Furthermore, the duality that defines both characters extends beyond performance into identity itself. The film examines what performers owe to their craft and what craft demands of performers. In particular, the female perspective through Olivia complicates the male rivalry at the narrative's center. Meanwhile, the film positions Nikola Tesla as the ultimate embodiment of ambition unmoored from morality, a cautionary figure whose genius destabilizes the rules governing the Victorian world.

Twins: Doubling, Duality, and DeceptionThe Prestige operates through systematic doubling. Twin magicians, a transported man illusion that exploits identical performers, and the fundamental duality of Christian Bale's Alfred Borden structure the film's central mystery. The screenplay leverages the audience's familiarity with magic mechanics—particularly the "double" as a common trick device—to guide viewers toward false conclusions. Meanwhile, the film treats twinning not merely as plot mechanism but as philosophical premise. Both main characters pursue versions of themselves that are more successful, more admired, or more powerful than their authentic selves. Additionally, the Tesla machine introduces a horrifying literalization of doubling: what happens when your double is not your collaborator but your replacement? The film's treatment of identity as something that can be split, cloned, or discarded raises questions about the self that persist long after the final reveal.

Mount Rushmore: Scandals of '96The Taste Buds rank the most shameful, embarrassing, or otherwise scandalous cinematic moments of 1996. Though The Prestige arrived a decade later, the conversation extends naturally to the ethical compromises and moral failings embedded in the film itself. Both Borden and Angier engage in forms of deception that approach criminality. The death of a stage assistant, the exploitation of Olivia, and the casual cruelty with which both men pursue victory constitute a catalog of wrongs that the film neither excuses nor entirely condemns. This section invites listeners to debate the film's moral landscape and the extent to which audience sympathy with these characters implicates us in their misconduct.

Shopping Spree: The Best of 2006 CinemaThe Shopping Spree segment celebrates the feast of cinema that 2006 offered. The Prestige competes in a year alongside Little Miss Sunshine, The Devil Wears Prada, Brick, and Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story. The conversation weighs Nolan's technical and narrative ambition against the year's other standouts, examining what makes 2006 a genuinely competitive year for the tournament. Furthermore, the panelists consider which films have endured most meaningfully and which have faded in critical esteem over two decades. Notably, The Prestige has sustained and even deepened its reputation as audiences have grown more sophisticated about Nolan's structural innovations.

Why The Prestige Podcast Resonates: What Makes This Film EndureTwenty years after its release, The Prestige remains relevant because it articulates anxieties about technology, identity, and performance that have only intensified. The film's treatment of the Tesla machine as a science-fiction intrusion into a historical setting prefigures contemporary concerns about artificial consciousness and the ethics of duplication. Beyond its formal brilliance, the film speaks to the human capacity for self-deception and the stories we tell ourselves to justify our ambitions. Additionally, Nolan's commitment to practical effects and in-camera illusions—a philosophy that runs through his career—makes The Prestige feel increasingly precious in an age of digital manipulation. The film argues, implicitly, that authentic magic resides not in technological wizardry but in the human desire to believe. Ultimately, The Prestige endures because it demands intellectual engagement while delivering emotional and sensory satisfaction—a balance that few contemporary films achieve. This is precisely why the Prestige podcast episode deepens with each listen, revealing new dimensions in both the film and its broader cultural significance.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 2006* 2006 Intro Part 1: Bracket Reveal * Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story * Brick * 2006 Mixtape Part I * The Puffy Chair * The Devil Wears Prada * Little Miss Sunshine * All Movie of the Year Episodes

Guest Panelist: Kenny McMillanKenny McMillan is the host and producer of Frame and Reference, a cinematography podcast featuring long-form, unstructured conversations with working cinematographers about their craft, influences, and current projects. Through Frame and Reference, McMillan has interviewed leading cinematographers working across film and television, exploring how visual storytelling shapes narrative impact. His deep engagement with cinematographic practice brings technical expertise and artistic sensibility to film discussion. McMillan's work on the podcast has established him as a thoughtful voice in cinematography education and criticism, emphasizing the collaborative relationship between director and cinematographer. His perspective on Nolan's visual strategy in The Prestige—particularly Hoyte van Hoytema's contributions to the film's misdirection—enriches the Taste Buds' examination of the film's technical achievement.

FAQ: The Prestige Podcast and FilmWhat is the Movie of the Year podcast, and what does this episode cover?Movie of the Year is a bracket-style film tournament podcast hosted by Ryan Haley, Mike, and Greg on the PopFilter network. Each season covers a single year of cinema. The 2006 episode featuring The Prestige examines Christopher Nolan's 2006 masterpiece through three critical lenses: Nolan's use of structure as misdirection, the psychology of magic and ambition in the narrative, and the film's systematic use of doubling and twinning as both plot device and philosophical statement.

What is The Prestige about?The Prestige follows two rival magicians in Victorian London whose obsession with besting one another leads to tragedy and revenge. After a stage accident kills a young woman, both Alfred Borden (Christian Bale) and Robert Angier (Hugh Jackman) pursue an illusion called the transported man, each believing the other has discovered its secret. The film layers multiple narratives and revelations, ultimately questioning whether the pursuit of perfection justifies the sacrifices required to achieve it. The film combines period detail, magical spectacle, and conceptual complexity into an experience that deepens with repeated viewing.

Who directed The Prestige?Christopher Nolan directed The Prestige, with a screenplay by Jonathan Nolan and David S. Goyer. The film is adapted from Christopher Priest's 1995 novel of the same name. Hoyte van Hoytema served as cinematographer, while Lee Smith edited the film. The cast includes Christian Bale, Hugh Jackman, Scarlett Johansson, Michael Caine, and David Bowie.

Why does The Prestige still matter today?The Prestige endures because it articulates anxieties about technology, identity, and authenticity that have only grown more urgent. The Tesla machine's introduction of a science-fiction element into a historical setting raises questions about artificial consciousness and the ethics of duplication that feel contemporary. Additionally, Nolan's commitment to practical effects makes the film feel increasingly precious in an era of digital manipulation. The film's formal complexity rewards intellectual engagement while delivering emotional satisfaction—a balance that distinguishes it from most contemporary cinema. Furthermore, the film's exploration of obsession, sacrifice, and the stories we tell ourselves to justify our ambitions resonates across two decades and multiple viewings.

What are the three main discussion topics in this episode?The episode explores Nolan and Structure (how the film's three-act narrative mirrors the structure of a magic trick), Magic and Ambition (the psychology of obsession and what performers sacrifice for their craft), and Twins (the film's systematic use of doubling as both plot mechanism and philosophical premise). These three angles organize the Taste Buds' examination of how form, theme, and narrative interact in Nolan's design.

How does the film use misdirection as both technique and theme?Misdirection operates on multiple levels in The Prestige. Narratively, Nolan structures the screenplay as a magic trick unfolding in three acts: the exposition, the turning point (misdirection), and the prestige (revelation). Cinematically, the editing and framing choices obscure crucial details while guiding attention toward false conclusions. Thematically, both characters employ misdirection within the world of the film itself, using illusion to conceal truth. The film asks audiences to participate in the same act of misdirection to which the characters are subject, making the viewing experience itself a kind of trick.

What does the film say about the cost of ambition?Both Borden and Angier pursue mastery at tremendous personal cost. Borden sacrifices his identity and agency, having shared his life with a twin for decades. Angier sacrifices his humanity, embracing a technological solution to the transported man that requires him to face his own replacement and eventual erasure. The film suggests that true achievement demands profound sacrifice and raises the question of whether the pursuit of excellence justifies the moral compromises required along the way. Neither character escapes unscathed, and the film does not offer forgiveness or redemption.

Is The Prestige better on a second viewing?Yes. The Prestige is deliberately constructed to reward repeat viewing. The screenplay plants clues and misdirects audience attention with such precision that viewers who understand the reveals on a second viewing often discover entirely new layers in the framing, editing, and dialogue. The film respects audiences enough to withhold crucial information in plain sight. Consequently, each viewing uncovers details that previous viewings rendered invisible. This quality separates The Prestige from films that rely on shock value and places it among works that sustain intellectual and emotional engagement across multiple encounters.

How does Hoyte van Hoytema's cinematography serve the film's narrative?Van Hoytema's cinematography reinforces Nolan's structural and thematic preoccupations through careful framing, lighting, and composition. The visual language emphasizes symmetry, doubling, and concealment—mirroring the film's interest in divided identities and hidden truths. The cinematography alternates between clarity and obscurity, revealing and concealing information in tandem with the narrative's misdirections. Furthermore, the period aesthetic of the cinematography lends authenticity to the Victorian setting while never feeling heavy-handed, allowing the film's conceptual machinery to remain the foreground.

What makes 2006 such a strong year for cinema?The Prestige competes alongside Little Miss Sunshine, The Devil Wears Prada, Brick, and Tristram Shandy, among many other notable films. The year offered diverse cinematic voices ranging from independent comedy to big-studio spectacle to intimate character studies. The depth and breadth of quality filmmaking in 2006 make the tournament genuinely competitive. Moreover, many of these films have sustained or deepened their critical reputations over time, suggesting that 2006 was a year of genuine cinematic consequence rather than temporary success.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006Little Miss Sunshine (feat. Don Shanahan from Every Movie Has a Lesson!)Little Miss Sunshine Podcast: The Hoovers Hit the BracketThe Little Miss Sunshine podcast episode has arrived, and the Taste Buds are packing into the VW bus. This week, Movie of the Year puts one of 2006's biggest indie success stories through the tournament. Ryan, Mike, and Greg welcome film critic Don Shanahan to help judge the Hoover family's run at the crown. Together, the panel digs into the family dynamics, the unforgettable ending, the film's surprising philosophical streak, and the husband-and-wife directing team behind it all. Additionally, the crew squares off in a round of Trivia and builds a fashion-themed Rushmore. Can a sunny yellow bus carry this movie deep into the 2006 bracket? Push, hop in, and find out.

About the FilmLittle Miss Sunshine follows the Hoover family on an 800-mile road trip from Albuquerque to Redondo Beach. Seven-year-old Olive has qualified for the Little Miss Sunshine beauty pageant, and the whole dysfunctional clan piles into a failing Volkswagen bus to get her there. The passenger list includes a failed motivational speaker, a suicidal Proust scholar, a Nietzsche-obsessed teen who refuses to speak, a heroin-snorting grandpa, and one very determined mom. Directed by Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris from Michael Arndt's screenplay, the film premiered at Sundance in January 2006. It became a box office sensation, grossing over $101 million on an $8 million budget. Moreover, it earned four Academy Award nominations, including Best Picture. Alan Arkin won Best Supporting Actor, and Arndt took home Best Original Screenplay. RogerEbert.com called it a gentle family satire in the tradition of the countercultural comedies of the 1970s. Now the film faces its toughest challenge yet: the Movie of the Year 2006 bracket.

Guest Panelist: Don ShanahanThe Taste Buds welcome film critic Don Shanahan to the panel. Don is a Chicago-based, Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and the founder of the long-running review site Every Movie Has a Lesson. He also serves as Editor-in-Chief and Content Supervisor of the film department at Film Obsessive. Furthermore, Don co-hosts the Cinephile Hissy Fit Podcast on the Ruminations Radio Network. A school teacher by day, he writes his reviews with life lessons in mind, from the serious to the farcical. Don is a director and co-founder of the Chicago Indie Critics and a voting member of the Critics Choice Association and the Online Film Critics Society. Consequently, few guests arrive better equipped to grade a movie about winners, losers, and everything in between.

The Hoover Family at the Heart of the Little Miss Sunshine PodcastEvery great road movie needs great passengers, and this one has six. The panel starts with the family itself. Richard preaches his nine-step winning program while his own career collapses. Sheryl holds everyone together with fried chicken and sheer will. Frank arrives fresh from a suicide attempt, and Dwayne has taken a vow of silence until he becomes a fighter pilot. Meanwhile, Grandpa coaches Olive's pageant routine with methods no pageant has ever approved. The Little Miss Sunshine podcast crew debates what makes this dysfunction feel so real. Notably, the film establishes the entire family in one legendary twenty-minute dinner scene. The Taste Buds and Don break down how each Hoover carries a private definition of failure. Ultimately, the group asks the big question: is this the best movie family of 2006?

Breaking Down the Ending on the Little Miss Sunshine 2006 PodcastYou know the scene. Olive takes the stage at the pageant, "Super Freak" drops, and the movie explodes. The panel dedicates a full segment to one of the most famous endings of the decade. By contrast with the polished pageant contestants, Olive's routine is pure chaos, and the family's response is pure love. The Hoovers stop trying to win and start dancing. Don and the Taste Buds debate whether the finale earns its catharsis or leans on shock value. In addition, the crew discusses how the ending flips the film's winners-and-losers thesis on its head. Does the dance number seal the film's bracket run, or does it divide the panel? The episode holds nothing back.

Nietzsche, Proust, and the Philosophy of LosingFew crowd-pleasers smuggle in this much philosophy. Dwayne worships Nietzsche and wears his contempt for conformity on his sleeve, or at least on his t-shirt. Frank, meanwhile, claims the title of preeminent Proust scholar in America. The panel unpacks why Michael Arndt built his comedy on these two thinkers. Frank's hospital-parking-lot speech about suffering becomes the film's secret thesis: the years of struggle are the years that make us. However, the movie never turns into a lecture. Instead, it hides its ideas inside gas station stops and highway breakdowns. The crew debates whether the philosophy holds up or simply decorates the road trip. Specifically, they ask what Nietzsche would think of a nine-step program for winning.

The Directors: Jonathan Dayton and Valerie FarisHusband-and-wife team Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris spent decades directing music videos before this debut feature. Their work with bands like The Smashing Pumpkins and R.E.M. sharpened an eye for visual storytelling on tight budgets. As a result, Little Miss Sunshine looks sun-bleached, precise, and effortlessly funny. The panel examines how the duo directs comedy through reaction shots rather than punchlines. The famous bus-pushing sequence becomes a masterclass in physical comedy and ensemble blocking. Additionally, the group traces the pair's later career through Ruby Sparks and Battle of the Sexes. Why did two music video veterans wait so long for a second film? The panel has theories, and some of them are even kind.

TriviaNo Movie of the Year episode is complete without Trivia. The Taste Buds and Don test each other on all things Little Miss Sunshine. Production history, casting near-misses, pageant facts, and VW bus mechanics are all fair game. The film's six-year development saga and its record-setting Sundance sale provide plenty of ammunition. Who takes the crown this week? Listen and find out.

Rushmore: FashionThis week's Rushmore segment tackles fashion. Each panelist carves their personal Mount Rushmore of movie fashion into the mountainside. Little Miss Sunshine gives the category a strong starting point. Olive's oversized glasses and red cowboy boots, Dwayne's brutal statement tees, and Richard's aggressively beige wardrobe all deserve consideration. Nevertheless, the panel ranges across all of film history for their picks. Expect passionate defenses, questionable taste, and at least one choice that starts an argument.

Why Little Miss Sunshine Still MattersTwenty years later, Little Miss Sunshine remains the gold standard for the crowd-pleasing indie. It proved a tiny comedy could outgross blockbusters and crash the Best Picture race. Furthermore, its skepticism about hustle culture and toxic winning has only grown more relevant. Richard's nine steps sound like half the internet in 2026. The film also launched Abigail Breslin, revived Alan Arkin, and showed the world Steve Carell could break hearts. Above all, it argues that losing together beats winning alone. That message keeps the Little Miss Sunshine podcast conversation alive two decades after the bus first rolled. For more from the season, check out the Movie of the Year 2006 intro episode and the 2006 Mixtape.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 2006* Movie of the Year 2006: Intro Part 1 * Movies of 2006: Bracket Reveal and Sweet 16 * Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story * 2006 Mixtape Part I * All Movie of the Year Episodes

FAQ: Little Miss Sunshine Podcast and FilmWhat is the Little Miss Sunshine podcast episode about?

The Taste Buds and guest critic Don Shanahan judge Little Miss Sunshine in the Movie of the Year 2006 bracket. Topics include the Hoover family, the ending, the film's philosophy, and directors Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris.

What is Little Miss Sunshine about?

A dysfunctional family drives a broken-down VW bus from New Mexico to California so young Olive can compete in a beauty pageant. Along the way, every member confronts their own definition of failure.

Who directed Little Miss Sunshine?

Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris directed the film. The married duo made their feature debut after a celebrated career in music videos.

Who wrote Little Miss Sunshine?

Michael Arndt wrote the screenplay, his first produced feature. He won the Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay and later wrote Toy Story 3.

More Little Miss Sunshine QuestionsDid Little Miss Sunshine win any Oscars?

Yes. Alan Arkin won Best Supporting Actor, and Michael Arndt won Best Original Screenplay. The film also earned nominations for Best Picture and Best Supporting Actress for Abigail Breslin.

Why does the family push the bus in Little Miss Sunshine?

The VW bus has a broken clutch, so it cannot start from a stop. Consequently, the family must push it to rolling speed and jump in, one by one.

Is Little Miss Sunshine based on a true story?

No. The story is fiction, though Michael Arndt drew inspiration from real child beauty pageant culture and a quote about winners and losers attributed to Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Why does Little Miss Sunshine still matter?

The film remains a landmark indie success and a sharp satire of American winning culture. Its themes of family solidarity and embracing failure feel more relevant than ever.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006The Devil Wears Prada (feat. Katie Walsh!)The Devil Wears Prada Podcast Episode: Fashion, Power, and the Best of 2006Welcome to The Devil Wears Prada podcast episode from Movie of the Year: 2006. This week, the Taste Buds enter the gleaming offices of Runway magazine. Furthermore, they bring backup. Film critic Katie Walsh joins Mike, Greg, and Ryan to decide whether David Frankel's fashion-world comedy can survive the 2006 bracket. Along the way, the panel debates feminism in the workplace, the myth of the suffering artist, and the eternal question of Andy's terrible friends. Additionally, the episode features a full Anne Hathaway Career Retrospective bracket. Consequently, this one runs deep on both style and substance.

About the FilmThe Devil Wears Prada arrived in the summer of 2006 and promptly stole it. Director David Frankel adapted Lauren Weisberger's bestselling novel about a young journalist grinding through an impossible job. Anne Hathaway stars as Andy Sachs, an aspiring writer who lands a position at Runway magazine. Her boss is Miranda Priestly, the most feared editor in fashion, played by Meryl Streep in an Oscar-nominated performance. Moreover, Emily Blunt and Stanley Tucci deliver career-launching supporting turns. The film earned over $300 million worldwide and near-universal acclaim. Notably, Roger Ebert praised Streep's icy, understated Miranda as the engine of the whole picture. For more background, the Wikipedia entry on The Devil Wears Prada covers its production and legacy in detail. The film now faces its toughest challenge yet: the Movie of the Year 2006 bracket.

Guest Panelist: Katie WalshThe Devil Wears Prada 2006 podcast episode welcomes a genuine authority to the panel. Katie Walsh is a Los Angeles-based film critic who reviews weekly releases for the Tribune News Service and the Los Angeles Times. Additionally, she serves as Vice President of the Los Angeles Film Critics Association. Her writing has appeared in GQ, Vanity Fair, Rolling Stone, Vulture, Slate, and The Playlist. She co-hosted the podcast Miami Nice and has guest-hosted Switchblade Sisters. Furthermore, she frequently appears on KCRW's Press Play and has taught film criticism at Chapman University's Dodge College of Film and Media Arts. In practice, that means the Taste Buds must actually defend their takes this week. Someone in the room knows what she is talking about.

Feminism and the WorkplaceIs Miranda Priestly a feminist icon or a cautionary tale? The panel digs into how the film frames women, power, and ambition. Miranda runs an empire, yet the film punishes her with a collapsing marriage. Meanwhile, Andy gets scolded by nearly everyone for taking her job seriously. The episode asks whether the movie critiques workplace sexism or accidentally reproduces it. Notably, Katie Walsh brings a critic's perspective to how 2006 audiences read Miranda versus how we read her now. Two decades of think pieces have flipped the film's villain into its hero. Ultimately, the panel debates whether that reversal says more about the movie or about us.

Can Art Only Come from Suffering?Andy suffers for a job she claims to hate, all in service of her writing dreams. Consequently, the Taste Buds tackle a bigger question: does great art require misery? The film suggests that paying dues at Runway makes Andy a better journalist. However, it also shows the cost. She loses friends, a boyfriend, and nearly herself. The panel weighs the romantic myth of the starving artist against the reality of creative work. By contrast, some of the best art comes from stability, support, and cerulean-blue sweaters chosen by someone else. Above all, this segment asks what we actually owe our ambitions.

Andy's Friends: The Worst People in FashionEvery rewatch of The Devil Wears Prada produces the same realization: Andy's friends are monsters. They mock her job, demand free designer swag, and play keep-away with her work phone. Meanwhile, her boyfriend Nate pouts because she missed his birthday party for her career. Therefore, the panel litigates the great question of the film's second act. Are these people grounding Andy in reality, or are they sabotaging her? Specifically, the group ranks the friends from least to most insufferable. Nevertheless, at least one Taste Bud attempts a defense of Nate. It does not go well.

Anne Hathaway Career Retrospective: The BracketSpecial segment time. The Devil Wears Prada podcast crew builds a full bracket to determine Anne Hathaway's most iconic role. The field spans her entire career. The Princess Diaries, Brokeback Mountain, Rachel Getting Married, Les Misérables, The Dark Knight Rises, and Interstellar all enter the arena. Additionally, deep cuts and dark horses make surprise appearances. Seeding arguments get heated. Upsets happen. As a result, friendships within the panel are tested. Does Andy Sachs herself take the crown, or does an Oscar-winning turn steal it? You will have to listen to find out. Check Anne Hathaway's full filmography on IMDb and play along at home.

Why The Devil Wears Prada Still MattersTwenty years later, The Devil Wears Prada refuses to fade. The film remains a Rosetta Stone for conversations about work, ambition, and the price of excellence. Miranda's cerulean monologue is still the definitive speech about how culture actually functions. Moreover, the movie launched Emily Blunt, redefined Anne Hathaway, and gave Meryl Streep one of her signature roles. A 2026 sequel proved the appetite never left. In addition, the film's questions have only grown sharper in the era of hustle culture and quiet quitting. Is Miranda a monster or simply held to a different standard? Ultimately, that debate keeps the film alive, and it makes for a fierce competitor in the Movie of the Year 2006 tournament.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 2006Catch up on the season so far, from the 2006 season introduction to the music that defined the year:

• Movie of the Year 2006: Intro Part 1
• The 2006 Bracket Reveal: Meet the Sweet 16
• Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story
• The 2006 Mixtape, Part I
• All Movie of the Year episodes

FAQ: The Devil Wears Prada Podcast and FilmWhat is this episode of The Devil Wears Prada podcast about?

The Taste Buds and critic Katie Walsh debate whether The Devil Wears Prada deserves to advance in the Movie of the Year 2006 bracket. Topics include workplace feminism, art and suffering, Andy's awful friends, and a full Anne Hathaway career bracket.

What is The Devil Wears Prada about?

Aspiring journalist Andy Sachs takes a job assisting Miranda Priestly, the tyrannical editor of Runway magazine. Consequently, Andy must decide how much of herself she will trade for success.

Who directed The Devil Wears Prada?

David Frankel directed the film. He later directed Marley & Me and worked extensively on Sex and the City. Aline Brosh McKenna wrote the screenplay from Lauren Weisberger's novel.

Who stars in The Devil Wears Prada?

Meryl Streep, Anne Hathaway, Emily Blunt, and Stanley Tucci lead the cast. Streep earned an Academy Award nomination for playing Miranda Priestly.

More Questions About The Devil Wears PradaIs Miranda Priestly based on Anna Wintour?

Widely, yes. Author Lauren Weisberger worked as an assistant to Vogue editor Anna Wintour, and Miranda is broadly understood as her fictional counterpart. However, Streep has said she modeled the performance on powerful men she knew rather than on Wintour.

Who is the guest on this episode?

Film critic Katie Walsh joins the panel. She reviews films for the Tribune News Service and the Los Angeles Times and serves as Vice President of the Los Angeles Film Critics Association.

What is the Anne Hathaway Career Retrospective?

It is a bracket-style special segment. The panel seeds Anne Hathaway's most famous roles against each other and votes round by round until one iconic performance remains.

Why does The Devil Wears Prada still matter?

The film remains the defining movie about ambition, mentorship, and toxic workplaces. Moreover, its cultural conversation keeps evolving, as the 2026 sequel proved.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006The Puffy ChairThe Puffy Chair Podcast Hits the RoadThe Puffy Chair podcast episode sends the Taste Buds on a road trip through the Duplass brothers' scrappy 2006 breakout. Ryan, Mike, and Greg buckle up to decide whether this mumblecore landmark deserves a deep run in the Movie of the Year 2006 bracket. Moreover, they bring serious backup this week. Critic and author Keith Phipps joins the panel to help unpack a movie made for the price of a used car. Together, the group digs into fragile relationships, DIY filmmaking, and one very symbolic recliner. Can a $15,000 indie outmuscle the blockbusters of 2006? Press play and ride along.

About the FilmThe Puffy Chair follows Josh, a struggling New York booking agent played by Mark Duplass. Josh wins an eBay auction for a burgundy recliner that matches the one his dad owned years ago. Consequently, he plans a road trip to deliver the chair as a birthday gift. His girlfriend Emily, played by Katie Aselton, comes along for the ride. His free-spirited brother Rhett, played by Rhett Wilkins, joins them on the way. Naturally, the trip tests every relationship in the van.

Jay Duplass directed the film, which he created with his brother Mark. The brothers shot it for roughly $15,000 borrowed from their parents, and the cast earned $100 a day. The movie premiered at Sundance in January 2005 and later won the Audience Award at South by Southwest. Roadside Attractions and Netflix released it theatrically on June 2, 2006. As a result, it qualifies for our 2006 bracket, and it arrives with real critical pedigree. Check the full credits at IMDb and the reviews roundup at Metacritic. New to the season? Start with our Movie of the Year 2006 introduction.

Guest Panelist: Keith PhippsKeith Phipps brings nearly three decades of film criticism to the panel this week. He joined The A.V. Club in 1997 and became its editor in 2004, helping build it into a cultural institution. Later, he co-founded the beloved film site The Dissolve and served as editorial director for film and TV at Uproxx. His byline has appeared in Rolling Stone, Slate, GQ, Vulture, and The New York Times, among many others. Currently, he writes The Reveal, a film newsletter he created with longtime collaborator Scott Tobias. He also co-hosts The Next Picture Show, a biweekly podcast in the Filmspotting family that pairs classic films with modern successors. Additionally, Phipps wrote the acclaimed book Age of Cage: Four Decades of Hollywood Through One Singular Career, an NPR Books We Love selection. Few guests know indie film history better, so the Taste Buds put him straight to work.

Josh and Emily (and Rhett)Every road movie needs passengers, and this one packs the van with tension. The panel starts with Josh and Emily, a couple fluent in baby talk but allergic to honest conversation. Their relationship anchors the film, and the podcast crew debates whether Josh ranks among 2006's most frustrating boyfriends. Emily wants commitment and emotional validation. Josh wants to deliver a chair and dodge every hard question along the way. Meanwhile, Rhett climbs aboard and scrambles the whole dynamic. His impulsive romanticism works as comic relief, yet it also lights the fuse under Josh and Emily's slow-motion breakup. Keith Phipps helps the Taste Buds weigh how the improvised performances make these fights feel painfully real. Ultimately, the group asks a simple question. Do we root for this couple, or do we root for the exits?

Filmmaking Style on The Puffy Chair 2006 PodcastStyle takes center stage in the second discussion topic. The Duplass brothers shot with handheld cameras, natural light, and a whole lot of improvisation. Critics soon filed the film under mumblecore, a label built on low budgets, naturalistic dialogue, and twentysomething malaise. However, the panel debates whether that label helps or flattens the movie. The Puffy Chair podcast crew also examines the famous snap zooms, the cramped framing, and the brothers' choice to cast their actual parents. Furthermore, Phipps places the film within the mid-2000s indie boom that he covered firsthand as a critic. The $15,000 budget becomes a character in itself. Does the rough look create intimacy, or does it simply look cheap? Notably, the panel connects this DIY approach to the music of the era covered in our 2006 Mixtape Part I.

The ChairWhat about the recliner itself? The chair works as the film's MacGuffin, its symbol, and arguably its best supporting player. Josh buys it because it resembles the chair from his childhood living room. Therefore, the purchase says less about his dad and more about Josh's own nostalgia. The panel unpacks what the chair represents: arrested development, misplaced sentimentality, and the gap between a grand gesture and genuine care. Along the journey, the chair suffers indignities that mirror the crumbling relationships around it. By contrast, the film's quietest moments reveal what an honest gift might have looked like. The Taste Buds and Keith Phipps debate whether the chair earns its title billing. No spoilers here, though. The chair's final fate stays a surprise for listeners.

Genre BlastThe episode also features a Genre Blast segment, a PopFilter favorite. The Taste Buds zoom out from the film and blast through its genre lineage. Is The Puffy Chair a road movie, a romantic comedy, a breakup drama, or the founding text of mumblecore? Each label carries its own history, and the panel traces them all. Specifically, the crew connects the film to decades of American road pictures and indie relationship stories. Keith Phipps adds critical context from his years covering the movement's rise and fall. Listen to the full episode to hear where the genre conversation lands.

Why The Puffy Chair Still MattersTwenty years later, this tiny film casts a surprisingly long shadow. The Duplass brothers parlayed it into a remarkable career spanning Cyrus, Safety Not Guaranteed, Togetherness, and Room 104. Mark Duplass and Katie Aselton became one of indie film's great creative couples. Meanwhile, the movie's distribution deal made history of its own. Netflix co-released it theatrically in 2006, an early experiment that hinted at the streaming future to come. The mumblecore movement it helped launch reshaped American independent film and influenced a generation of DIY creators. Above all, The Puffy Chair podcast conversation proves the film still sparks real debate. Its questions about commitment, communication, and growing up have not aged a day. The AFI Catalog preserves the film's place in the historical record. Our bracket will decide its place in 2006.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 2006* Movie of the Year: 2006 Intro Part 1 * Movies of 2006 Bracket Reveal and Sweet 16 * Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story * 2006 Mixtape Part I * All Movie of the Year Episodes

FAQ: The Puffy Chair Podcast and FilmWhat is The Puffy Chair podcast episode about?The Puffy Chair podcast episode features the Taste Buds and guest Keith Phipps evaluating the Duplass brothers' 2006 film for the Movie of the Year bracket. Topics include the Josh and Emily relationship, the film's mumblecore style, the symbolism of the chair, and a Genre Blast segment.

What is The Puffy Chair about?The film follows Josh, who wins an eBay auction for a recliner matching his dad's old chair. He road-trips to deliver it as a birthday gift, joined by his girlfriend Emily and his brother Rhett. Consequently, the journey exposes every crack in their relationships.

Who directed The Puffy Chair?Jay Duplass directed the film, which he made with his brother Mark Duplass, who wrote, produced, and starred. Many sources credit the brothers as a filmmaking team, and the movie launched their careers.

Who stars in The Puffy Chair?Mark Duplass stars as Josh, Katie Aselton plays Emily, and Rhett Wilkins plays Rhett. Notably, the Duplass brothers' real parents appear as Josh's parents.

Is The Puffy Chair a mumblecore movie?Yes, critics widely consider it a founding film of the mumblecore movement. Its low budget, improvised dialogue, and naturalistic performances defined the style. However, the Duplass brothers have expressed mixed feelings about the label, a tension the episode explores.

How much did The Puffy Chair cost to make?The Duplass brothers made the film for roughly $15,000, borrowed from their parents. Additionally, the actors earned about $100 per day during the shoot.

Where can I watch The Puffy Chair?Availability changes over time, so check current streaming and rental options on a service like JustWatch. The film originally reached theaters through Roadside Attractions and Netflix in June 2006.

Who is the guest on this episode?Film critic Keith Phipps joins the Taste Buds. He co-writes The Reveal newsletter, co-hosts The Next Picture Show podcast, and wrote the book Age of Cage: Four Decades of Hollywood Through One Singular Career.

Why does The Puffy Chair still matter?The film launched the Duplass brothers' careers, helped define mumblecore, and pioneered an early Netflix theatrical release that foreshadowed the streaming era. Ultimately, its honest look at commitment and communication keeps it relevant twenty years later.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006Mixtape, Part IIThe 2006 Mixtape Part 2 Podcast Finishes the PlaylistThe 2006 Mixtape Part 2 podcast picks up exactly where Part I left off. The full five person panel returns to finish what they started: a definitive, collectively built playlist of the best songs of 2006. Ryan, Mike, and Greg, the Taste Buds behind Movie of the Year, are once again joined by guests Nate Ragolia and Taylor Wilhite. Consequently, the debates get sharper as the remaining playlist slots get scarcer.

Part I established the ground rules and the early picks. Now, in Part 2, the panel faces the harder half of the job. The obvious anthems are gone. Therefore, every remaining selection demands a real argument, a defense of taste, and a willingness to absorb four rounds of pushback.

How the 2006 Mixtape Podcast Format WorksThe Mixtape episodes mark a deliberate departure from the standard Movie of the Year format. Normally, the show runs films through a bracket, as it did in the 2006 bracket reveal. The Mixtape works differently. Each panelist adds one song per round to a shared playlist. There are no eliminations and no head to head matchups. Instead, the tension comes from scarcity and pride.

Every pick claims a slot that another panelist wanted. Moreover, every pick invites immediate judgment from the rest of the table. The format rewards conviction above all. A safe choice earns shrugs. A bold choice, defended well, earns respect. In practice, the round-robin structure turns a simple playlist into a portrait of five distinct musical sensibilities colliding in real time.

Guest Panelists: Nate Ragolia and Taylor WilhiteNate Ragolia returns for the second half of the Mixtape. Nate co-hosts Debut Buddies, a podcast dedicated to firsts of all kinds, and he has authored three published books. His background as a writer and critic gives his picks analytical weight. Additionally, he arrives with the confidence of someone who has already survived one full round of Taste Bud scrutiny in Part I.

Taylor Wilhite also returns to complete the panel. Taylor is a former PopFilter mainstay whose appearances are now rare, which gives the Mixtape episodes a sense of occasion. Longtime listeners know his taste and his willingness to fight for it. Together, the two guests expand the show's usual trio into a five voice ensemble. As a result, the playlist reflects a far wider slice of 2006 than any single host could deliver.

The Music of 2006, RevisitedThe year 2006 offered an unusually rich field for a project like this. Pop radio belonged to Justin Timberlake, Beyonce, and Rihanna. Meanwhile, Gnarls Barkley's Crazy became an inescapable cultural event. Emo and pop-punk hit a commercial peak, hip-hop delivered landmark records, and indie rock crossed over to mainstream ears. The full sweep of the year is documented at Wikipedia's 2006 in music page, and it is staggering in retrospect.

Movie of the Year usually spends its energy on cinema, the kind of work chronicled at RogerEbert.com. However, the Mixtape episodes prove the same critical instincts apply to music. The panel treats each song the way the show treats films like Brick or Tristram Shandy: with curiosity, skepticism, and a genuine desire to figure out what holds up twenty years later.

Completing the PlaylistPart 2 covers the closing rounds of the mixtape. The panel works through the final picks, and the stakes rise with every turn. Notably, the late rounds force each panelist to confront what the playlist still lacks. Does it need another ballad? Another guitar record? Another undeniable radio smash? Each answer reshapes the final product.

The completed tracklist stays a surprise until you press play. No spoilers here. Nevertheless, expect passionate defenses, at least one pick that baffles the room, and the special satisfaction of hearing a playlist snap into its final form. By the end, the panel delivers a mixtape that could only exist through this exact collision of five sensibilities.

Why the 2006 Mixtape Part 2 Podcast Still MattersThe 2006 Mixtape Part 2 podcast completes the season's most distinctive experiment. The Movie of the Year season began with the 2006 intro episode and a field of 128 films. The Mixtape widens that lens. It argues that a year of culture includes its soundtrack, and that the songs of 2006 shaped memory just as powerfully as its movies did.

Above all, the episode captures why list making endures as a critical exercise. A playlist forces choices, and choices reveal values. Ultimately, the 2006 Mixtape Part 2 podcast delivers both a finished tracklist and a spirited argument about what deserves to last. Subscribe, listen to both parts, and then build your own version. Yours will differ, and that is exactly the point.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 2006* 2006 Mixtape, Part I * Movie of the Year: 2006 Intro, Part 1 * Movies of 2006: Bracket Reveal and Sweet 16 * Tristram Shandy: Movie of the Year 2006 * Brick: Movie of the Year 2006 * Browse All Movie of the Year Episodes

FAQ: 2006 Mixtape Part 2 PodcastAbout the EpisodeWhat is the 2006 Mixtape Part 2 podcast about?

The 2006 Mixtape Part 2 podcast is the concluding half of a special Movie of the Year episode. The five person panel of Ryan, Mike, Greg, Nate Ragolia, and Taylor Wilhite finishes building a collective playlist of the best songs of 2006, one pick at a time.

Do I need to listen to Part I first?

Listening to Part I first is recommended. Part I establishes the format, introduces the panel, and covers the opening rounds. Part 2 continues directly from that point and completes the tracklist.

Who are the guests on the 2006 Mixtape Part 2 podcast?

Nate Ragolia and Taylor Wilhite return for Part 2. Nate Ragolia co-hosts the Debut Buddies podcast and has authored three published books. Taylor Wilhite is a former PopFilter regular who now makes occasional guest appearances.

About the Mixtape and the MusicHow does the Mixtape format work on Movie of the Year?

Each panelist takes turns adding one song per round to a shared 2006 playlist. There is no bracket and no eliminations. Every pick must survive the scrutiny of four other panelists with strong opinions about the music of 2006.

What songs are on the 2006 mixtape?

The full tracklist stays a surprise until you hear the episodes. The picks span pop, hip-hop, indie rock, R&B, and the emo and pop-punk wave that defined 2006 radio. Listen to both parts to hear every selection and the arguments behind them.

Who are the Taste Buds?

The Taste Buds are Ryan, Mike, and Greg, the three core hosts of Movie of the Year on the PopFilter network. Each season they run a bracket style competition to crown the best film of a single year. The current season covers 2006.

What were the biggest songs of 2006?

2006 produced era defining hits like Gnarls Barkley's Crazy, Justin Timberlake's SexyBack, and Beyonce's Irreplaceable. The year also marked a commercial peak for emo and pop-punk. The Mixtape episodes dig into which songs actually deserve playlist immortality.

Where can I listen to the 2006 Mixtape Part 2 podcast?

You can stream the episode right on this page using the player above. Movie of the Year is also available on all major podcast platforms through the PopFilter network.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006Mixtape, Part IThe 2006 Mixtape Podcast Kicks Off — One Song at a TimeThe 2006 Mixtape podcast episode is unlike anything else in the Movie of the Year catalog. Instead of debating a single film, Ryan, Mike, and Greg welcome two special guests — Nate Ragolia of Debut Buddies and longtime PopFilter friend Taylor Wilhite — for a round-robin music showcase that captures the full, chaotic glory of 2006's soundscape. Each panelist takes a turn placing one song into a collective playlist, building something that is part argument, part love letter, and part time machine back to a genuinely strange year in pop culture.

2006 was a transitional moment in popular music. Rap remained dominant, but with several megastars between album cycles, the charts opened up to a remarkably diverse mix of genres. Moreover, pop-punk and emo were infiltrating the mainstream at full speed. Additionally, R&B, dancehall, and indie rock were all jostling for space on the same playlists. The result was a year where "SexyBack," "Hips Don't Lie," "I Write Sins Not Tragedies," and "Dani California" could all feel equally essential — and equally of the moment. Consequently, building a 2006 mixtape is less a curation exercise and more a negotiation, which is exactly what makes this episode so much fun.

Tune in for Part I of the 2006 Mixtape on the Movie of the Year 2006 podcast, and find out whose taste holds up, whose picks land with a thud, and which songs define the year better than any film ever could.

About the 2006 Mixtape FormatThe Mixtape episode breaks from the standard Movie of the Year formula in the best possible way. Rather than a single film under the microscope, the full panel of five — Ryan, Mike, Greg, Nate, and Taylor — each take turns contributing one song per round to a shared playlist. The songs land wherever they land: the bracket, the conversation, the collective memory. No rules govern the selection beyond personal conviction and a willingness to defend the pick.

The format rewards both champions of the obvious and advocates for the overlooked. Someone will inevitably go for the consensus anthem. Someone else will go deep on an album cut that never charted but defined their year. Furthermore, disagreements are baked in. Five people with five different relationships to the music of 2006 means that every pick is a small act of argument — an assertion about what mattered and why.

Part I covers the opening rounds of that playlist construction. Part II will follow, continuing the conversation and expanding the tracklist. Together, they form a two-part portrait of a year in music told through the ears of five people who were living it.

Guest Panelists: Nate Ragolia and Taylor WilhiteNate Ragolia is a freelance writer, editor, published author, voice over artist, and podcaster based in the PopFilter extended universe. He co-hosts Debut Buddies, a fortnightly podcast dedicated to firsts — debut albums, premiere episodes, inaugural seasons, the first of anything worth examining. Co-hosted with Kelly Attaway and Chelsea Hollander, Debut Buddies has built a devoted audience by taking the concept of beginnings seriously and hilariously. Nate is also the author of three books: There You Feel Free (2015), The Retroactivist (2019), and One Person Can't Make a Difference (2022). He brings to the Mixtape episode both the analytical rigor of someone who thinks carefully about cultural artifacts and the genuine enthusiasm of a lifelong music fan.

Taylor Wilhite is a familiar voice to longtime PopFilter listeners. A former mainstay of the network, Taylor steps back into the booth for this special occasion — one of his rare guest appearances since stepping back from regular podcasting. His history with the PopFilter crew means he arrives fully acclimated to the energy, the arguments, and the particular pleasure of five people trying to out-taste each other in real time. His presence makes Part I feel like a reunion as much as a music show.

Building the Playlist: Round by RoundEach round of the 2006 Mixtape follows the same structure: one panelist, one song, one chance to make the case. The picks accumulate into something that starts to resemble an actual playlist — though a playlist with a lot of disagreement baked into its sequencing.

2006 was the kind of year where the argument over what belongs is genuinely interesting. The Billboard charts were dominated by Daniel Powter's "Bad Day," Sean Paul's "Temperature," and Justin Timberlake's "SexyBack." However, the year also produced landmark indie and alternative releases, left-field hip-hop moments, and a wave of pop-punk anthems that hit a specific generation square in the chest. Notably, the question of which songs were great versus which songs were simply inescapable is a distinction worth debating — and this episode debates it at length.

As a result, the round-by-round format becomes a kind of stress test for taste. Each pick either extends the playlist's internal logic or breaks it, and the panel's reactions reveal as much about their musical identities as about the songs themselves. Part I lays the groundwork for what promises to be a contentious and deeply enjoyable full tracklist.

Why 2006's Music Deserves a Closer ListenIt is easy to dismiss the music of 2006 as a transitional era — neither the peak years of hip-hop's commercial dominance nor the coming digital disruption that would reshape the industry within a few years. Nevertheless, that framing undersells how much was actually happening. Beyoncé released B'Day. The Raconteurs debuted. Stadium Arcadium by the Red Hot Chili Peppers dropped as a double album. FutureSex/LoveSounds by Justin Timberlake redefined what a mainstream pop record could sound like.

Above all, 2006 was the last full year before the iPhone and streaming would begin to permanently reorganize how people discovered and consumed music. In practice, this means the mixtape as a cultural object — physical or digital — still carried enormous weight. A playlist in 2006 was still a statement, still a gift, still a way of saying something about who you were and what you cared about. Therefore, building a 2006 mixtape now is an act of archaeology as much as curation, and the Movie of the Year crew approaches it with exactly the right combination of nostalgia and rigor.

Meanwhile, the Mixtape format itself reflects something true about the show: Movie of the Year has always been as much about the people doing the talking as about the films under discussion. Bringing in Nate Ragolia and Taylor Wilhite expands that conversation in ways that a single-film episode simply cannot. The result is one of the most purely enjoyable episodes in the 2006 season.

Why the 2006 Mixtape Podcast Still MattersThe mixtape as a format has never really gone away. Streaming playlists are its digital descendants, and the impulse behind them — the desire to arrange songs into an argument about feeling and meaning — is as alive now as it was when people were still burning CDs. The 2006 Mixtape episode taps into that impulse directly, using the year's music as a lens for understanding both the culture of 2006 and the tastes of the five people assembled to discuss it.

Specifically, the episode works because it trusts its panelists. Nate Ragolia's credentials as a critic and author give his picks analytical weight. Taylor Wilhite's history with PopFilter gives the episode a sense of occasion. And the core Taste Buds — Ryan, Mike, and Greg — provide the continuity and argumentative energy that listeners have come to expect from the 2006 season. Together, they make a compelling case that the music of 2006 is worth revisiting, debating, and yes, assembling into a playlist — even twenty years later.

Ultimately, the 2006 Mixtape podcast is the season's most distinctive episode, and Part I is where it all begins. Subscribe, listen, and start forming your own opinions about what should have made the cut.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 2006* Movie of the Year: 2006 — Intro Part 1 * Movies of 2006 — Bracket Reveal and Sweet 16 * Tristram Shandy — Movie of the Year: 2006 * Brick — Movie of the Year: 2006 * Browse All Movie of the Year Episodes

FAQ: 2006 Mixtape Podcast — Part IAbout the EpisodeWhat is the 2006 Mixtape podcast episode about?

The 2006 Mixtape, Part I is a special episode of Movie of the Year in which the full five-person panel — Ryan, Mike, Greg, Nate Ragolia, and Taylor Wilhite — take turns contributing songs to a shared 2006 playlist. Each round features one pick per panelist, building a collective mixtape that reflects the full range of the year's music while generating plenty of debate along the way.

Who are the guests on the 2006 Mixtape episode?

The episode features two special guests. Nate Ragolia is the co-host of Debut Buddies, a podcast about firsts, and the author of three published books. Taylor Wilhite is a former PopFilter mainstay who returns for a rare guest appearance. Together with the core Taste Buds trio, they form a five-person panel for the Mixtape episodes.

How does the Mixtape format work on Movie of the Year?

Each panelist takes turns placing one song into a collective playlist. The picks go wherever they go — there is no preset bracket or elimination structure. The format rewards personal conviction and the willingness to defend a choice in front of four other people with their own strong opinions about 2006 music.

Is this a two-part episode?

Yes. The 2006 Mixtape is split into Part I and Part II. Part I covers the opening rounds of playlist construction and establishes the panel's early picks and arguments. Part II continues the conversation and completes the tracklist. Together they form a full portrait of the year's music as filtered through five distinct sets of ears.

About the Music of 2006What made 2006 such a distinctive year in music?

2006 was a transitional moment on the charts. Rap remained dominant, but with several major artists between albums, the top 40 opened up to an unusually diverse mix. Pop-punk and emo were crossing over to mainstream audiences. R&B, dancehall, and indie rock were all charting simultaneously. The result was a year where wildly different songs felt equally essential and equally of their moment.

What were some of the biggest songs of 2006?

The year's Billboard chart-toppers included Daniel Powter's "Bad Day," Sean Paul's "Temperature," and Justin Timberlake's "SexyBack." The year also produced major moments from Beyoncé, Rihanna, Shakira, Panic! at the Disco, the Red Hot Chili Peppers, and many others. The diversity of those names alone gives a sense of how broad and contested the musical landscape was.

What is Debut Buddies, Nate Ragolia's podcast?

Debut Buddies is a fortnightly podcast co-hosted by Nate Ragolia, Kelly Attaway, and Chelsea Hollander. Each episode focuses on a first — a debut album, a premiere episode, an inaugural season, or any other significant beginning in art and culture. The show is available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and other major platforms.

Where can I find more Movie of the Year episodes from the 2006 season?

All 2006 season episodes are available on the Movie of the Year podcast page at PopFilter. The season includes film episodes, bracket reveals, and special format episodes like the Mixtape. New episodes are published regularly throughout the season.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006BrickThe Brick podcast episode of Movie of the Year arrives just in time to appreciate one of 2006's most audacious genre experiments. Ryan, Mike, and Greg are joined by Pete Wright of TruStory FM to dig into Rian Johnson's neo-noir debut, a film that transplants the hard-boiled world of Dashiell Hammett into the hallways and parking lots of a Southern California high school. Few films from this era take a bigger swing, and fewer still land it this cleanly.

About Brick (2006)Brick is a neo-noir mystery thriller written, edited, and directed by Rian Johnson in his feature directorial debut. The film opened in New York and Los Angeles on April 7, 2006, distributed by Focus Features. It stars Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Brendan Frye, a teenage loner who pushes his way into the criminal underworld of his high school to investigate the disappearance -- and eventual murder -- of his ex-girlfriend Emily, played by Emilie de Ravin. The supporting cast includes Lukas Haas as the drug kingpin known only as the Pin, Nora Zehetner as the duplicitous Laura, Noah Fleiss as the enforcer Tug, and Richard Roundtree as a vice principal navigating the chaos from the margins.

Johnson wrote the first draft in 1997 immediately after graduating from USC School of Cinematic Arts. He spent the next seven years trying to get it made, with every financier asking him to set it in college instead of high school. He ultimately raised approximately $450,000 from friends and family, shot the film in 20 days, and spent three months rehearsing with the cast beforehand. The score -- inventive and deeply atmospheric -- was composed by Johnson's cousin Nathan Johnson using traditional instruments alongside improvised ones including filing cabinets, kitchen utensils, and tack pianos, all recorded on an Apple PowerBook.

The film drew on hardboiled classics, particularly the novels of Dashiell Hammett, and won the Special Jury Prize for Originality of Vision at the 2005 Sundance Film Festival. It holds an 80% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes and earned three stars from Roger Ebert, who called it a rich source of dialogue and behavior. You can read Ebert's full review at RogerEbert.com. Brick has since become a cult classic and a clear blueprint for Johnson's later work on Knives Out.

Find the full cast and crew listing at Brick on IMDb.

Guest Panelist: Pete WrightPete Wright is a podcaster, author, educator, and co-founder of TruStory FM, a podcast production network he has built over more than three decades in media. He has logged thousands of episodes across more than three dozen shows covering film, ADHD, creative process, brand storytelling, and the craft of audio production. His work spans journalism, corporate communications, and graduate-level teaching, where he spent fifteen years working with students on storytelling and media production.

Among his best-known projects is The Next Reel Film Podcast, a deep-dive film discussion series that serves as his primary film-critical home. He also co-hosts Taking Control: The ADHD Podcast alongside Nikki Kinzer, an award-winning show with over a million annual downloads and 29 seasons of episodes since its 2010 launch. In 2024, Pete and Nikki co-authored Unapologetically ADHD: A Step-by-Step Framework for Everyday Planning on Your Terms, a practical guide grown directly from the podcast's community and themes. His debut science fiction novella, Lattice, was published in 2026. Pete's most recent podcast venture is Headstone, a personal series about legacy, memory, and the stories we leave behind. He is based in Portland, Oregon. This Brick podcast episode marks his first appearance on Movie of the Year.

Brick Podcast Discussion: Noir in High SchoolThe central creative gamble of Brick is not simply that it applies film noir conventions to a high school setting. More precisely, it applies them without irony. Johnson made a deliberate choice to play every scene completely straight, and the cast follows his lead without a single wink at the camera. Consequently, the absurdity of the premise becomes the engine of the film's tension rather than its release valve.

This Brick podcast opens with a foundational question: does the noir-in-high-school conceit actually work? The genre's grammar depends heavily on power asymmetry, corruption, and the lone investigator operating outside institutional structures. High school provides all three. Brendan's relationship with the vice principal mirrors the classic detective's uneasy truce with law enforcement. The Pin's basement headquarters functions as the smoky back room. The femme fatale and the enforcer play their archetypal roles without adjustment.

Johnson drew specifically on the novels of Dashiell Hammett -- particularly the Continental Op stories -- and encouraged his cast to read Hammett rather than watch noir films. He wanted the stylistic choices to come from the source material, not from imitation of existing screen adaptations. That decision gives Brick a distinctive texture. Moreover, the dialogue mixes actual period noir slang with invented high school vernacular in a way that creates its own self-consistent world. As Roger Ebert noted, the story never fully clarifies itself while it unfolds, but it delivers a rich supply of behavior and incident along the way.

Genre Bending: What the Brick 2006 Film Is Actually DoingBrick belongs to a specific 2006 moment when genre recombination was operating at a high creative pitch. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang had landed the previous year playing similar games with noir self-awareness. Sin City had arrived with a maximalist visual approach to the same source material. Brick chose a third path: minimal budget, straight-faced commitment, and an insistence that the formal constraints of the genre could do meaningful emotional work if you simply trusted them.

The genre-bending discussion on this Brick podcast examines how Johnson uses the noir framework not as homage but as architecture. The structure of a hardboiled mystery -- the inciting mystery, the series of contacts, the betrayal, the revelation -- maps onto adolescent social hierarchies with surprising precision. Furthermore, the paranoia endemic to the genre translates naturally into the heightened social surveillance of high school life, where everyone watches everyone and information is currency.

The Spaghetti Western and Anime InfluencesJohnson has cited Sergio Leone's Spaghetti Westerns and Shinichiro Watanabe's Cowboy Bebop as visual influences alongside the noir literary tradition. That combination matters, because it explains why Brick never feels purely retro. The film's rhythm and its relationship to violence carry a different energy than classic noir. Notably, Johnson used shoes as a design element for each character, treating footwear as an immediate visual shorthand for who each person is. It's a small detail that reflects how thoroughly he thought through every layer of the film's visual language.

Additionally, the score by Nathan Johnson uses invented instruments -- wine-o-phones, tack pianos, kitchen utensils -- to create an atmosphere that nods to classic noir without reproducing it. The result is a film that works as genre exercise, coming-of-age story, and tone poem simultaneously.

The Treatment of Women in BrickNoir has always had a complicated relationship with its female characters, and Brick inherits that complication without fully interrogating it. Emily exists primarily as a body -- a mystery to be solved, a loss to be avenged. She drives the entire plot but occupies very little of the film's actual screen time. Laura is more present, but her function remains rooted in the femme fatale archetype: beautiful, manipulative, ultimately revealed as the architect of the tragedy.

The Brick podcast addresses this directly. Does Johnson's decision to play the genre completely straight mean he also reproduces its blind spots uncritically? The case for the defense is that Brick is a formal exercise, and the female characters serve genre functions that the film deliberately signals as such. The case against is that signaling an archetype and interrogating it are different things, and Brick largely declines to do the latter.

Moreover, the pregnancy subplot -- Emily is pregnant with Tug's child, a revelation that triggers her murder -- adds a layer of consequence to the female characters' bodies that the film handles with notable brevity. It functions as a plot mechanism more than a human reality. The discussion examines how this choice shapes the film's emotional center, which ultimately rests entirely with Brendan's grief and not with Emily's life or Laura's survival.

Nevertheless, Nora Zehetner's performance as Laura earns genuine complexity within the constraints the script gives her. The hosts explore whether that performance transcends the archetype or simply executes it with exceptional skill.

Rushmore: 2006 It BoysThe Taste Buds carve out space in this episode for a Rushmore segment dedicated to the It Boys of 2006 -- the young male actors whose stars were ascending in that specific cultural moment. Brick arrives at a fascinating point in Joseph Gordon-Levitt's career trajectory, before Inception and The Dark Knight Rises made him a mainstream anchor, when he was still operating in the cult-film space that Brick so precisely inhabits. The Rushmore discussion considers who belongs on this particular mountain and why that moment produced the specific constellation of young male talent that it did. Tune in to the Brick podcast to hear who makes the cut.

PopFilter Hall of FameThe PopFilter Hall of Fame segment makes an appearance in this episode, as the Taste Buds consider whether Brick has earned permanent enshrinement. The Hall of Fame is reserved for films that don't just succeed on their own terms but expand what those terms can mean -- films that create new possibilities for the work that follows them. The conversation weighs Brick's influence, its cult staying power, and its role as a proving ground for one of the more distinctive directorial voices to emerge from American independent cinema in the 2000s. Listen to this Brick podcast episode to hear whether Brick gets the call.

Why Brick Still MattersNearly twenty years after its release, Brick retains its strangeness. That is not a minor achievement. Most genre exercises age into familiarity; their cleverness eventually reads as mere cleverness. Brick holds because the emotional core underneath the stylistic apparatus is genuinely felt. Brendan's grief is real, even when his dialogue sounds like it arrived from 1934. The loss at the center of the film carries weight that the genre architecture does not deflect.

Furthermore, Brick matters as a document of what independent filmmaking could accomplish in 2006 with discipline and a clear vision. Johnson made the film for $450,000, shot it in 20 days, and produced something that has outlasted hundreds of films made for fifty times the budget that same year. That resource efficiency is itself an argument -- an argument that formal ambition and emotional honesty are more durable than production scale.

The film also matters as the first chapter in a directorial career that has continued to evolve and surprise. Brick established that Rian Johnson was willing to commit entirely to a formal gamble and see it through. That commitment runs as a continuous thread through Looper, Knives Out, and Glass Onion. Understanding Brick is, in many ways, the foundation for understanding everything Johnson has done since.

Above all, Brick earns its place in any serious conversation about 2006 cinema because it did something genuinely new with materials that had existed for decades. In a year full of sequels and franchise installments, that counts for a great deal. Tune in to the Movie of the Year podcast to hear the full verdict from the Taste Buds and Pete Wright.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 2006* Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story -- Movie of the Year: 2006 * 2006 Bracket Intro Part 1 -- Movie of the Year: 2006 * 2006 Bracket Reveal / Sweet 16 -- Movie of the Year: 2006 * All Movie of the Year Episodes

FAQ: Brick Podcast and FilmWhat is this episode of the Movie of the Year podcast about?

This Brick podcast episode features Ryan, Mike, and Greg alongside guest Pete Wright of TruStory FM. The Taste Buds discuss Rian Johnson's 2006 neo-noir debut, covering the film's use of classic noir conventions in a high school setting, its approach to genre bending, and the treatment of its female characters. The episode also includes a Rushmore segment on 2006 It Boys and a PopFilter Hall of Fame vote.

What is Brick about?

Brick is a 2006 neo-noir mystery thriller in which high school student Brendan Frye investigates the disappearance and murder of his ex-girlfriend Emily. His investigation pulls him into the criminal underworld operating within his Southern California high school, led by a drug kingpin known as the Pin. The film uses the plot structure and dialogue conventions of classic 1930s hardboiled detective fiction, applied without irony to a contemporary teenage setting.

More Frequently Asked QuestionsWho directed Brick?

Rian Johnson wrote, directed, and edited Brick. It was his feature directorial debut, made for approximately $450,000 after seven years of failed attempts to find financing. Johnson subsequently directed The Brothers Bloom, Looper, Star Wars: The Last Jedi, Knives Out, and Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery.

Who stars in Brick?

Joseph Gordon-Levitt stars as Brendan Frye. The supporting cast includes Lukas Haas as the Pin, Nora Zehetner as Laura, Emilie de Ravin as Emily, Noah Fleiss as Tug, and Richard Roundtree as the vice principal. Gordon-Levitt carries nearly every scene of the film and was cast after Johnson saw him in Manic (2001).

Is Brick actually a good movie?

Brick holds an 80% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes and earned three stars from Roger Ebert, who praised its rich dialogue and behavior. It won the Special Jury Prize for Originality of Vision at Sundance 2005 and has become a cult classic. Critics are divided on whether the stylized dialogue is dazzling or alienating, but the film's formal ambition and Gordon-Levitt's performance are widely considered exceptional.

Is Brick based on a book?

Brick is not based on a specific book, but Rian Johnson drew heavily on the hardboiled novels of Dashiell Hammett -- particularly the Continental Op stories and novels like The Maltese Falcon and The Thin Man. Johnson encouraged his cast to read Hammett rather than watch existing noir films, in order to source the style from the literary original rather than from prior screen adaptations.

Why does everyone in Brick talk so strangely?

The dialogue in Brick mixes actual 1930s hardboiled detective slang with invented high school vernacular, applied without any signal to the audience that this is unusual within the film's world. Johnson designed the language this way deliberately, treating the dialogue as the primary carrier of the genre. The press notes for the original theatrical release included a glossary. The effect is disorienting at first and becomes deeply immersive once viewers accept the film on its own terms.

What does the title Brick mean?

In the film, a "brick" refers to a compressed block of heroin, roughly the size and shape of a brick. The missing brick of heroin is the MacGuffin around which the film's criminal plot revolves. It also functions as a piece of hardboiled slang that fits naturally within the film's period-appropriate dialogue register.

How does Brick connect to Rian Johnson's later work?

Brick established Johnson's interest in genre as a formal and emotional tool rather than simply as a commercial category. His commitment to playing the genre completely straight in Brick reappears in Knives Out and Glass Onion, where he applies Agatha Christie-style locked-room mystery conventions with the same earnestness. Many critics and fans treat Brick as the essential starting point for understanding Johnson's body of work.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006SlitherThe Slither Podcast Brings Body Horror to the 2006 BracketThe Slither podcast episode unleashes the first true horror movie on our Movie of the Year 2006 bracket. After opening the season with Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story, the Taste Buds trade metafiction for meteorites. Consequently, things get slimy fast. Ryan, Mike, and Greg welcome producer and festival programmer Drea Clark to dig into James Gunn's gleefully gross directorial debut. Together, the panel asks whether a movie full of alien slugs deserves a deep run in the bracket. Above all, they ask whether Slither has more on its mind than exploding deer and tentacled husbands.

About the FilmSlither is a 2006 science fiction horror comedy written and directed by James Gunn. A meteorite crashes outside the small town of Wheelsy, South Carolina, carrying an alien parasite. The parasite infects wealthy local Grant Grant, played with squirming brilliance by Michael Rooker. Soon, Grant transforms into a tentacled monster, and slug-like creatures spread through the town. Meanwhile, police chief Bill Pardy (Nathan Fillion) and Grant's wife Starla (Elizabeth Banks) try to stop the invasion.

Universal released the film on March 31, 2006. Notably, it flopped at the box office, grossing under $13 million against a $15 million budget. However, critics largely embraced it. Roger Ebert praised its Troma-loving spirit in his RogerEbert.com review, and the film became a cult favorite on home video. In addition, it launched the directing career that eventually gave us Guardians of the Galaxy and the new DC Universe.

Guest Panelist: Drea ClarkThis week the Taste Buds welcome Drea Clark, a true film industry polymath. Drea co-hosts Maximum Film! on the Maximum Fun network, the long-running movie podcast she shares with film critic Alonso Duralde. Furthermore, her credentials behind the scenes run deep. She has served on the Sundance Film Festival programming team, led narrative feature programming at Slamdance for over a decade, spent ten years with the LA Film Festival, and curated Geena Davis's Bentonville Film Festival. As a producer, her features include The Last Time You Had Fun, Lake Los Angeles, and No Light and No Land Anywhere, the latter executive produced by Miranda July. In short, few guests are better equipped to judge a scrappy genre debut from a first time director.

James Gunn as a First-Time FilmmakerBefore Slither, James Gunn was a writer with a strange resume. He cut his teeth at Troma on Tromeo and Juliet, then wrote the live action Scooby-Doo movies and the 2004 Dawn of the Dead remake. Consequently, Slither arrived as his first chance to direct his own material. The panel debates what the film reveals about Gunn as a filmmaker. Specifically, they trace the DNA that later shows up in Guardians of the Galaxy, The Suicide Squad, and Superman. The needle drops, the found family of misfits, and the sincere heart under the gross-out gags all start here. Moreover, Drea brings a programmer's eye to the question of how debut features signal a career to come.

Sex and Violence on the Slither 2006 PodcastSlither earns its R rating with enthusiasm. The Taste Buds tackle how the film weaponizes both sex and violence, often in the same scene. Grant's infection plays like a grotesque infidelity story, and the alien's reproductive plans push body horror into genuinely uncomfortable territory. However, the violence stays cartoonish enough to keep the comedy alive. The panel asks where Gunn draws that line, and whether the bathtub scene, the barn scene, and that infamous bursting body still shock today. Ultimately, the conversation lands on a bigger question. Does the film use its excess for a purpose, or is the excess the point?

Is Slither an Allegory?Every great monster movie smuggles in a meaning, or so the theory goes. Therefore, the panel puts Slither on the couch. Is the film an allegory for toxic marriage, with Grant's transformation literalizing a controlling husband? Is it about small town conformity, as a hive mind absorbs an entire community? By contrast, maybe Gunn simply loves slugs and explosions, and the search for subtext misses the joke. Drea, Ryan, Mike, and Greg each stake out a position. Nevertheless, the debate keeps circling back to Starla, whose arc gives the film its surprising emotional weight.

TriviaNo Movie of the Year episode is complete without Trivia. This week's round digs into Slither's production and its B-movie family tree. Expect questions about the practical effects, the casting, and the film's connections to Troma legend Lloyd Kaufman, who cameos in the movie. Additionally, the segment tests whether the panel can untangle Slither from the movies it lovingly rips off, including Night of the Creeps and Shivers. Play along and see if you can outscore the Taste Buds.

Dream Blunt RotationNew season, new games. In Dream Blunt Rotation, the panel assembles the ultimate smoke circle from the world of Slither. Which characters make the cut, and which get left outside the garage? Mayor Jack MacReady seems like a chaotic invite, while Bill Pardy might be the chillest hang in Wheelsy. Meanwhile, the conversation drifts toward the cast and crew themselves. Listen to find out who earns a spot in the rotation and whose vibes get vetoed.

Awards and RecommendationsThe episode closes with Awards and Recommendations, the segment where the Taste Buds hand out honors to the film's cast, crew, and creatures. Nominees this week range from Michael Rooker's fearless physical performance to the effects team behind the slugs. As a result, expect passionate cases and at least one baffling pick. The winners stay a surprise, so you will have to listen for the results. Afterward, the panel shares recommendations for what to watch next if Slither leaves you hungry for more horror comedy.

Why Slither Still MattersTwenty years later, Slither looks like a turning point hiding in plain sight. It kept practical creature effects alive at a moment when Hollywood was abandoning them. Furthermore, it proved that horror comedy could carry real emotion, a balance Gunn has chased ever since. The film's box office failure also tells a story about 2006 itself, a year when audiences ignored a future superstar director. In practice, the Slither podcast episode asks the question this whole season exists to answer. Does cult status and influence make a movie a contender for the best film of 2006? Listen and judge for yourself.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 2006* Movie of the Year: 2006 — Intro, Part 1 * Movies of 2006: The Bracket Reveal * Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story * All Movie of the Year episodes

FAQ: Slither Podcast and FilmWhat is this episode of the Slither podcast about?

Ryan, Mike, and Greg debate whether James Gunn's Slither deserves to advance in the Movie of the Year 2006 bracket. Guest panelist Drea Clark joins to discuss Gunn's debut, the film's sex and violence, and its possible allegories.

What is Slither (2006) about?

An alien parasite crash-lands near the small town of Wheelsy, South Carolina, and infects a wealthy local named Grant Grant. He mutates into a tentacled monster while slug-like creatures take over the town. A police chief and Grant's wife fight to stop the invasion.

Who directed Slither?

James Gunn wrote and directed Slither as his feature directorial debut. He later directed the Guardians of the Galaxy trilogy and now co-runs DC Studios.

Who stars in Slither?

The cast includes Nathan Fillion, Elizabeth Banks, Michael Rooker, Gregg Henry, and Tania Saulnier, with a small role for Jenna Fischer. Full credits are on IMDb.

More Questions from the Slither 2006 PodcastWas Slither a box office success?

No. The film grossed under $13 million against a $15 million budget. However, strong reviews and home video sales turned it into a cult classic.

Is Slither a remake?

No, but it wears its influences proudly. Gunn openly drew on Night of the Creeps, Shivers, The Blob, and the Troma catalog, where he started his career.

Who is the guest on this episode?

Drea Clark, producer, festival programmer, and co-host of the Maximum Film! podcast on Maximum Fun.

Why does Slither still matter?

It launched James Gunn's directing career, championed practical effects, and perfected the horror comedy tone that countless films have imitated since. The Slither podcast episode makes the full case.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull StoryThe Tristram Shandy Podcast Opens the 2006 BracketThe Tristram Shandy podcast episode kicks off our brand new 2006 bracket on Movie of the Year. After crowning our way through 1971, the Taste Buds turn to a fresh film year. Moreover, we start with one of the strangest comedies of the decade. Michael Winterbottom's Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story is a film about making a film of an unfilmable book. Consequently, it makes a perfect launch title for a show that loves movies about movies. In this episode, Ryan, Mike, and Greg dig into metafiction, gender, and the prickly chemistry between Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon. Additionally, two new segments make their debut. Above all, we want to set the tone for a wild 2006 season.

About the FilmLaurence Sterne published The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman in nine volumes between 1759 and 1767. The novel is famous for being playful, digressive, and nearly impossible to adapt. Notably, the narrator barely manages to get himself born across hundreds of pages. Winterbottom and his team turned that problem into the whole joke. As a result, the movie follows a fictional crew trying to film the book. Steve Coogan plays a vain version of himself, plus Tristram and his father, Walter. Meanwhile, Rob Brydon plays a needling version of himself and Uncle Toby. The screenplay carries the pseudonym "Martin Hardy," although Frank Cottrell-Boyce actually wrote it. Furthermore, the cast includes Keeley Hawes, Shirley Henderson, Dylan Moran, Naomie Harris, Kelly Macdonald, and Jeremy Northam. Gillian Anderson and Stephen Fry also appear as heightened versions of themselves. You can read more at Wikipedia or the original Roger Ebert review.

This is the first film episode of our 2006 season. To explore the wider bracket project, visit the Movie of the Year archive. If you enjoy this Tristram Shandy podcast deep dive, our A Clockwork Orange episode from the 1971 run pairs nicely with this conversation about cinematic form.

Want to hear how the season began? Start with our 2006 season intro, then dig into the 2006 bracket reveal before this episode.

Metafiction and the Unfilmable NovelMetafiction sits at the center of our first discussion. Sterne wrote a novel that constantly reminds you it is a novel. Similarly, Winterbottom built a movie that keeps reminding you it is a movie. The crew breaks the fourth wall, argues about the script, and screens its own dailies. Therefore, the film becomes a hall of mirrors about storytelling itself. The Taste Buds ask a simple question. How do you adapt a book that mocks the idea of adaptation? Furthermore, we trace the lineage from Sterne to modern self-aware comedies. Films like Adaptation and Day for Night come up as obvious cousins. Ultimately, we argue that Winterbottom found the only honest solution. He filmed the failure instead of the book. Consequently, the movie respects Sterne by refusing to tame him.

The Battle of the Sexes on ScreenNext, we turn to gender and how the film portrays men and women. The male characters chase status, sex, and screen time with comic desperation. Coogan, in particular, frets about his shoe lifts and his billing. Meanwhile, the women in the film often hold the real power. Kelly Macdonald plays Jenny, who grounds Coogan with calm clarity. Naomie Harris plays Jennie, a production assistant who runs circles around the panicking men. Gillian Anderson arrives late and instantly reshapes the production. By contrast, the men flail and posture. So the Taste Buds debate a thorny point. Does the movie satirize male ego, or does it quietly indulge it? Additionally, we weigh how the battle of the sexes plays inside an 18th-century story. The novel and the film both poke fun at male pride. As a result, the gender comedy spans two very different centuries.

Coogan and Brydon Anchor the Tristram Shandy PodcastAbove all, the Coogan and Brydon double act drives this Tristram Shandy podcast conversation. The two comedians play exaggerated, petty versions of themselves. Their rivalry over billing, teeth, and impressions fuels the funniest scenes. Notably, this dynamic later powered the beloved series The Trip. The Taste Buds dig into why their friction feels so real. Brydon needles, Coogan bristles, and the comedy snaps into focus. Furthermore, we discuss how improvisation shapes their banter. The closing Al Pacino impression duel becomes a highlight. Meanwhile, we ask whether the pair actually like each other on screen. The answer stays gloriously unclear. Consequently, their chemistry gives a chilly intellectual film a warm, human pulse.

Rushmore: The Mount Rushmore of 2006 TelevisionOur Rushmore segment asks each host to carve a Mount Rushmore of 2006 television. The year was loaded with future classics. For instance, The Wire aired its acclaimed fourth season. Meanwhile, The Office, 30 Rock, and Friday Night Lights were all finding their feet. Additionally, prestige newcomers like Dexter and Heroes premiered to big buzz. The hosts each pick four shows and defend their choices. Naturally, the debate gets heated fast. Listen to the episode to hear which four faces each Taste Bud sets in stone.

I Never Metacritic I Didn't LikeThis episode debuts a brand new game called "I Never Metacritic I Didn't Like." The premise is simple and a little dangerous. We pull up a film's Metacritic profile and put the critical consensus on trial. Specifically, we test whether the aggregate score matches our own gut reactions. Tristram Shandy earned strong reviews from critics on release. However, strong scores do not always survive a Taste Buds cross-examination. Therefore, the game lets us argue with the wider critical record in real time. Expect this segment to return throughout the 2006 season. Above all, it gives us a structured excuse to fight about numbers.

Why Tristram Shandy Still MattersTristram Shandy still matters because it cracked a problem that had defeated everyone before it. Winterbottom proved you can film an unfilmable book by filming the attempt. Moreover, the movie launched a now-legendary comic partnership. The Coogan and Brydon collaboration grew into The Trip and its many sequels. Additionally, the film remains a sharp, funny lesson in adaptation. Film students and Sterne scholars both still cite it today. Ultimately, the Tristram Shandy 2006 podcast discussion shows why this small comedy punches far above its weight. Notably, it kicks our 2006 bracket off with brains and mischief.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 2006The 2006 season is just getting started, so this list will grow each week. For now, revisit the episodes that set up the bracket, plus a favorite from our 1971 run.

• Movie of the Year 2006: Season Intro
• The 2006 Bracket Reveal
• Movie of the Year archive
• The Last Picture Show (1971)

FAQ: Tristram Shandy Podcast and FilmWhat is this Tristram Shandy podcast episode about?

In this episode, Ryan, Mike, and Greg launch the 2006 bracket by breaking down Michael Winterbottom's comedy. They cover metafiction, gender, the Coogan and Brydon dynamic, and two new segments.

What is the movie Tristram Shandy about?

The film follows a crew trying to adapt an unfilmable 18th-century novel. As they struggle, the actors' egos and offscreen lives take over the production.

Who directed Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story?

Michael Winterbottom directed the film. Frank Cottrell-Boyce wrote the screenplay under the pseudonym "Martin Hardy."

Is Tristram Shandy based on a book?

Yes. Laurence Sterne wrote The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman across nine volumes between 1759 and 1767. You can read more on Wikipedia.

Do Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon play themselves?

Yes, mostly. Both actors play exaggerated, fictional versions of themselves, and they also play characters in the film within the film. See the full cast on IMDb.

Is Tristram Shandy connected to The Trip?

Yes, in spirit. This film first paired Coogan and Brydon with Winterbottom, and that chemistry later grew into the hit series The Trip.

Why does Tristram Shandy still matter?

It solved an adaptation problem that stumped writers and filmmakers for centuries. Moreover, it sparked one of modern comedy's best double acts.

Where can I listen to the Movie of the Year 2006 podcast?

You can stream every episode through the Movie of the Year archive on PopFilter, plus Spotify and your favorite podcast app.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006The Sweet 16 RevealedThe Best Movies of 2006 Enter the BracketThis episode puts the movies of 2006 on the clock, as Ryan, Mike, and Greg reveal which 16 titles advance to the bracket season. The Taste Buds have spent weeks wrestling with a starting field of 64 films, and the cuts have been real. The debates ahead will be worth every minute.

Getting from 64 films to 16 requires real conviction. Every cut involves films with legitimate credentials, passionate defenders, and strong arguments in their favor. Consequently, this episode does more than announce a list. It reflects a set of choices the Taste Buds are prepared to defend all season long.

About Movie of the YearMovie of the Year is a PopFilter podcast built around one question: what was the best film of a given year? Ryan, Mike, and Greg select a year, assemble a 64-film bracket, and argue their way to a champion. The format rewards deep cinematic knowledge, honest disagreement, and a willingness to change your mind when the argument demands it.

The show has built a catalog of bracket seasons that reward both longtime listeners and newcomers. Each season has its own personality, shaped by the films in contention and the friction those films generate in debate. The 2006 season carries that tradition forward with a year that has only gotten more interesting with time.

2006: A Year Worth Arguing AboutFew years in recent memory offer the range that 2006 does. Prestige dramas, international films, genre pictures, and independent features all had strong years, and the critical consensus at the time did not always hold up. Some films that dominated awards conversation look different now. Meanwhile, others that were overlooked at release have since built lasting reputations.

Roger Ebert captured the energy of 2006 well. His review of The Departed reflected a year when ambitious filmmaking found real audiences, and when the line between commercial and prestige cinema blurred in productive ways. Additionally, 2006 produced genuine disagreement between critics and general audiences, which is exactly the kind of tension that makes a bracket season compelling.

The Taste Buds considered films across every genre and profile when building the 64-film field. Notably, some titles with strong critical support did not survive the early cuts, while others with devoted fanbases made a stronger case than expected. That tension runs through every round of the bracket.

How the Movies of 2006 Bracket WorksThe bracket is central to what makes Movie of the Year function as a podcast. The Taste Buds begin with 64 films, then work through rounds of debate until one film stands alone. Each episode focuses on a specific matchup or group of films, with Ryan, Mike, and Greg arguing for and against each contender.

The Sweet 16 revealed in this episode seeds the season ahead. From there, head-to-head matchups determine which films advance through the Elite Eight, the Final Four, and ultimately the championship. However, seeding does not guarantee anything. A well-argued case can always change the outcome, and upsets are part of the format.

For listeners new to the show, this episode therefore serves as an ideal starting point. The Taste Buds make each debate accessible and entertaining, regardless of how familiar you are with any individual film.

The Road to the Sweet 16Cutting 64 films to 16 means making hard calls. The Taste Buds apply consistent criteria across every cut: rewatchability, cultural staying power, craft, and genuine argument value within the bracket. A film that cannot generate a compelling debate does not serve the season well, regardless of its pedigree.

Above all, the goal is a Sweet 16 that produces great arguments. A bracket full of obvious consensus picks would make for a dull season. Consequently, the Taste Buds deliberately include films that create friction, titles where reasonable and informed people genuinely disagree about their value and legacy.

Some of the 16 films advancing will surprise listeners. Others will feel inevitable. The full reveal happens in this episode, and the reasoning behind each selection is part of what makes debating the movies of 2006 so worthwhile from start to finish.

A Starting Field Built for DebateThe 64-film field the Taste Buds assembled for 2006 reflects the full range of what the year produced. Genre range mattered in the curation process. So did the desire to include films that cut against consensus and force the bracket to reckon with less comfortable choices. Specifically, the films that survive into the Sweet 16 represent a cross-section of 2006 that rewards close attention and strong opinions.

Why the Movies of 2006 Still MatterThe Movie of the Year podcast treats film debate as something worth doing seriously. The 2006 season carries that forward with a year whose critical reputation has shifted meaningfully since its release. Films that seemed certain to endure have faded. Others that barely registered in awards conversation have grown into genuine touchstones.

The bracket format demands accountability that casual film lists do not. When you argue for a film head-to-head against another specific film, you have to articulate why you believe what you believe. Furthermore, you have to hold that position under pressure from two other opinionated co-hosts who may disagree entirely.

Specifically, 2006 sits at a cultural inflection point. Studio filmmaking, independent cinema, and international film all competed for serious critical attention that year, and the market rewarded each in different ways. The season will reflect that range, and the debates will run deep. The movies of 2006 have a lot left to say, and this season is where they say it.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year* Movie of the Year — Full Episode Archive * The Last Picture Show — Movie of the Year: 1971 * A Clockwork Orange — Movie of the Year: 1971 * The French Connection — Movie of the Year: 1971 * Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory — Movie of the Year: 1971

Note: Add 2006 episode URLs to this list as they are published.

FAQ: Movies of 2006 and the Bracket RevealAbout the Episode and the ShowWhat is this movie's 2006 podcast episode about?

Ryan, Mike, and Greg reveal the 16 films advancing to the 2006 bracket season. They narrow a starting field of 64 films down to the Sweet 16, setting up the full season of head-to-head debates ahead.

What is Movie of the Year?

Movie of the Year is a PopFilter podcast where hosts Ryan, Mike, and Greg debate and rank films from a single year using a bracket format. Each season covers one year of cinema and ends with one film crowned champion.

Who hosts Movie of the Year?

The show is hosted by Ryan, Mike, and Greg, collectively known as the Taste Buds, on the PopFilter podcast network. Each host brings a distinct critical perspective to every debate.

How does the Movie of the Year bracket work?

The Taste Buds begin each season with 64 films from the chosen year. Through debate-style episodes, films compete head-to-head until one film is crowned Movie of the Year. The Sweet 16, Elite Eight, Final Four, and championship rounds each produce their own episodes.

About the 2006 SeasonWhy is 2006 a significant year in film history?

2006 produced a strong and varied field of films across genres and profiles. Prestige dramas, international cinema, genre filmmaking, and independent features all had notable years, making 2006 an ideal year for bracket debate.

How did the Taste Buds select the 64-film starting field?

The Taste Buds curated the field based on critical reception, cultural staying power, rewatchability, and argument value within the bracket format. The goal was a field that represents the full range of 2006, including some selections that will surprise listeners.

Where can I listen to Movie of the Year?

Movie of the Year is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and wherever you listen to podcasts. Full episodes and archives are also available at popfilter.co.

What films made the 2006 Movie of the Year Sweet 16?

The 16 films advancing to the bracket are revealed in this episode. Listen to find out which films survived and how the Taste Buds justify every selection.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2006A New Season BeginsThe Movies of 2006 Podcast Begins: 128 Films Enter the BracketThe movies of 2006 podcast is officially underway, and the Taste Buds are ready to take on one of the richest film years of the 21st century. Ryan, Mike, and Greg kick off the 2006 season on PopFilter by introducing the year, explaining the bracket structure, and beginning the first round of eliminations. Furthermore, Part 1 of the intro sets the tone for a season packed with genuine heavyweights, unlikely contenders, and some of the most debated films of the decade.

2006 delivered a field that refuses to cooperate with easy rankings. The Departed sits alongside Pan's Labyrinth, Children of Men, and Little Miss Sunshine in the same calendar year. Additionally, Casino Royale, The Prestige, Babel, Borat, and Idiocracy all arrived in 2006, representing wildly different visions of what cinema can accomplish. The Taste Buds have their work cut out for them.

About the 2006 Film Year2006 stands as one of the most celebrated film years of the decade. Martin Scorsese's The Departed swept the Academy Awards, winning Best Picture and earning Scorsese his first Oscar for Best Director. Meanwhile, Guillermo del Toro delivered Pan's Labyrinth, a Spanish-language dark fantasy that works equally as a fairy tale and a historical horror. Alfonso Cuarón's Children of Men earned near-universal acclaim for its singular, one-take-heavy vision of a dying civilization.

The box office reflected 2006's breadth. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest topped the global charts. Casino Royale relaunched the Bond franchise with Daniel Craig in his debut as 007. Cars kept Pixar's winning streak intact. Moreover, the comedies were just as crowded: Borat, Talladega Nights, Idiocracy, and Clerks II each built devoted audiences. Consequently, building a bracket from this year means making choices that will draw genuine disagreement from all directions.

International cinema contributed heavily to 2006's depth. Alejandro González Iñárritu's Babel earned seven Academy Award nominations after competing at Cannes. Pedro Almodóvar's Volver brought Penélope Cruz one of her most celebrated screen performances. The year also produced major releases from Darren Aronofsky (The Fountain), Sofia Coppola (Marie Antoinette), Christopher Nolan (The Prestige), and Mel Gibson (Apocalypto). In practice, few years in recent memory offer this density of debate-worthy titles across this many genres. The movies of 2006 represent a year when every corner of the industry produced something worth arguing about.

How the Movie of the Year Bracket WorksMovie of the Year uses a bracket format borrowed from sports tournaments. The Taste Buds seed 128 films from a given year and match them head-to-head across multiple rounds until one earns the title of best of the year. The movies of 2006 provide an especially deep pool to draw from. Each round cuts the field in half: 128 to 64, 64 to 32, 32 to the Sweet 16, and on through the Elite Eight, Final Four, and championship. Notably, the bracket covers the full range of the year — prestige titles, genre pictures, comedies, blockbusters, and deep cuts all compete on equal footing.

The seeding and matchups drive the conversation. A high-seeded favorite facing a scrappy underdog often produces the most spirited debates, because the Taste Buds evaluate every film on its own terms. No film earns an automatic pass based on reputation alone. A beloved blockbuster can fall in round one. A smaller film can advance much further than anyone expects. Therefore, the bracket functions as a pressure test for every assumption the hosts carry into the season.

The format also distinguishes Movie of the Year from a standard best-of list. The hosts cannot simply rank their favorites and close the debate. Instead, they defend each pick against a direct opponent, round after round. Above all, the bracket produces arguments that a list never could, because every vote carries immediate consequences. To see what this process looks like across a full season, the Movie of the Year archive includes complete coverage of every year the Taste Buds have tackled, including the recently completed 1971 season.

The 2006 First Round: Inside the Movies of 2006 Podcast BracketThe first round of the 2006 season pits 64 matchups against one another and cuts the field in half. Part 1 of the intro covers the opening set of battles, with Part 2 completing the round. Even the quickest first-round decisions carry weight, because an early upset can remove a major contender long before the serious rounds begin.

2006 gives the hosts no shortage of compelling first-round scenarios. High-profile releases like Superman Returns, X-Men: The Last Stand, and Blood Diamond arrive as recognizable titles but face real scrutiny on merit. Films like Half Nelson, Brick, and Thank You for Smoking represent the indie side of the year with strong critical backing. Moreover, the international titles — Pan's Labyrinth, Volver, Perfume: The Story of a Murderer — introduce a different set of criteria into the matchups entirely.

The documentary field adds another dimension. An Inconvenient Truth became one of 2006's most discussed releases and earned Al Gore an Academy Award. Jesus Camp generated controversy and critical notice in equal measure. Additionally, the horror entries, the prestige dramas like United 93 and The Good Shepherd, and the awards-season crowding all create pressure across the bracket from the opening round. Roger Ebert's four-star review of The Departed captures the critical consensus around 2006's most decorated film. Nevertheless, the first round is only the beginning.

Why 2006 Still Matters2006 represents a pivotal moment in 21st-century cinema. The year demonstrated that prestige filmmaking and mass entertainment could share a single calendar without one displacing the other. The Departed and Pan's Labyrinth both belong to 2006. Borat and Children of Men arrived the same year. That range matters because the best film years do not produce one kind of great film — they produce many kinds simultaneously.

Moreover, 2006 produced titles that have only grown in cultural stature since their release. Idiocracy arrived with little fanfare and now functions as a widely cited cultural reference point. Children of Men drew modest theatrical audiences and currently ranks among the most admired films of the decade in retrospective criticism. The Prestige built a devoted following that continues to generate debate about its structure and its final image. Additionally, Casino Royale remains the gold standard for modern Bond films nearly two decades later.

The movies of 2006 podcast gives these films a structured arena to compete. That structure reveals something a ranked list cannot: which films hold up under sustained comparison, which reputations survive direct opposition, and which consensus picks turn out to be more fragile than they appear. 2006 deserves this treatment. The Taste Buds are the right crew to find out which film earns the crown.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year* Movie of the Year — Full Episode Archive * The Last Picture Show — Movie of the Year: 1971 * A Clockwork Orange — Movie of the Year: 1971

More 2006 episode pages will be linked here as the season progresses.

FAQ: Movies of 2006 Podcast and Film YearWhat is the movies of 2006 podcast intro episode about?

This episode launches the 2006 season of Movie of the Year on PopFilter. Ryan, Mike, and Greg introduce the 2006 film year, explain the bracket format, and work through Part 1 of the first round, taking the field from 128 films down toward 64.

How does the Movie of the Year bracket format work?

Movie of the Year seeds 128 films from a given year into a tournament-style bracket. Films compete head-to-head across multiple rounds — from 128 to 64, then 32, the Sweet 16, Elite Eight, Final Four, and championship — until one film earns the title of best of the year. The format produces arguments that a simple ranked list cannot, because every vote has immediate consequences.

What films are in the 2006 Movie of the Year bracket?

The 2006 bracket includes 128 films from across the year: prestige dramas like The Departed, Babel, and Letters from Iwo Jima; international titles like Pan's Labyrinth and Volver; genre films like Children of Men and The Prestige; comedies like Borat, Idiocracy, and Little Miss Sunshine; and blockbusters like Casino Royale and Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest.

What won Best Picture for the 2006 film year?

The Departed, directed by Martin Scorsese, won the Academy Award for Best Picture at the 79th Academy Awards in 2007. The film also earned Scorsese his first Best Director Oscar. However, Oscar history and the Movie of the Year bracket determine their champions independently.

More Questions About the Movies of 2006 PodcastIs 2006 considered a great year for film?

Many critics and enthusiasts regard 2006 as one of the strongest film years of the 21st century. The Departed, Pan's Labyrinth, Children of Men, Little Miss Sunshine, and Casino Royale all arrived in the same year, representing a remarkable concentration of acclaimed films across multiple genres and styles.

Who directed Pan's Labyrinth?

Pan's Labyrinth was directed by Guillermo del Toro and released in 2006. The Spanish-language dark fantasy stars Ivana Baquero as a young girl navigating post-Civil War Spain and a fantastical underworld. The film won three Academy Awards and is widely regarded as one of del Toro's defining works.

Who hosts the Movie of the Year podcast?

Movie of the Year is hosted by Ryan, Mike, and Greg, collectively known as the Taste Buds. The show is part of the PopFilter podcast network and publishes episode pages at popfilter.co.

Where can I listen to the Movie of the Year 2006 podcast?

The Movie of the Year 2006 podcast is available at popfilter.co and on all major podcast platforms, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and wherever you get your podcasts.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971The Finale, Part IIThe 1971 Film Finale Podcast: One Champion RemainsThe 1971 film finale podcast brings the Taste Buds' most ambitious bracket season to its definitive conclusion. Ryan, Mike, and Greg have debated, dismissed, and championed their way through a remarkable field — and now eight films remain. In this episode, four Elite Eight matchups collapse into a single champion, and five major awards close out the season before the final verdict arrives.

Furthermore, this finale caps a season that has included some of the most provocative, challenging, and enduring films ever made. From Stanley Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange to William Friedkin's The French Connection, the 1971 bracket has consistently rewarded listeners willing to sit with difficult, boundary-pushing work. The season also covered Straw Dogs, Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song, and Dirty Harry — each one generating strong arguments before falling short of the Elite Eight.

Additionally, five competitive award categories — Best Sex, Best Violence, Musical Moment, Best Actor, and Best Actress — draw nominees from across the full season. Consequently, this episode stands as the richest and most content-dense installment of the year.

Contents* The Elite Eight Matchups * The 1971 Awards * Why the 1971 Film Finale Podcast Still Matters * Related Episodes * FAQ

The Elite Eight MatchupsEight films enter. One leaves as the 1971 champion. The Taste Buds structured the Elite Eight around four head-to-head matchups, and each one forces a different kind of critical argument.

A Clockwork Orange vs. The DevilsTwo of the year's most transgressive films meet in the first matchup. A Clockwork Orange arrived as a season-long frontrunner — a Kubrick film operating at the height of his formal powers, one that the Taste Buds covered in depth on their dedicated episode. Ken Russell's The Devils, meanwhile, delivers a fever dream of religious hysteria and state violence that stands as one of the most divisive films the Taste Buds have discussed all season. Moreover, this matchup poses a pointed question: which film earns its provocation more honestly? Both demand something from the viewer. However, only one advances.

Harold and Maude vs. McCabe and Mrs. MillerHarold and Maude represents the season's most warmly beloved film — a dark comedy about love, death, and radical living that generated some of the most enthusiastic podcast discussion of the year. By contrast, Robert Altman's McCabe and Mrs. Miller offers a revisionist Western suffused with melancholy and moral exhaustion, its beauty inseparable from its grief. Both films carry passionate advocates among the Taste Buds. Consequently, this matchup ranks among the tightest and most personal bracket debates of the entire season. Above all, it asks whether warmth or ache makes the stronger lasting impression.

Wanda vs. The ConformistBarbara Loden's Wanda — a micro-budget American independent masterwork — faces Bernardo Bertolucci's The Conformist, a visually ravishing Italian political drama. Notably, both films center on characters adrift in systems designed to diminish them. Nevertheless, they arrive at very different emotional endpoints: Wanda drifts, the Conformist spirals. The Taste Buds' arguments in this matchup reveal as much about their own critical values as about the films themselves. In practice, this is the bracket's most purely cinephile debate.

The French Connection vs. The Last Picture ShowThe bracket's most commercially dominant film — The French Connection, winner of five Academy Awards including Best Picture — faces Peter Bogdanovich's elegiac The Last Picture Show. In practice, this matchup pits Hollywood's muscular genre filmmaking against its more introspective New Wave ambitions. As a result, the debate cuts to the heart of what 1971 cinema actually achieved. Gene Hackman's Popeye Doyle and the dusty streets of Anarene, Texas, represent two entirely different ideas of what a great film should do — and the Taste Buds have strong opinions on which idea wins.

The 1971 AwardsBefore the bracket champion is named, the Taste Buds present five awards covering the full sweep of the season. This Movie of the Year 1971 podcast segment features each host nominating the moments they found most memorable, daring, or essential — and the resulting field spans an extraordinary range of films and tones.

Best SexThe nominees range from the tender to the violent to the surreal, drawing from three different films and three distinct registers of human sexuality.

• Jacy and Abilene — The Last Picture Show
• The Pool Party — The Last Picture Show
• The Rape of Christ — The Devils
• The Sex Duel with the Biker Gang — Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song
• Young Sweetback and the Sex Worker — Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song

Best ViolenceThe nominees span the full tonal range of 1971 action filmmaking — from Dirty Harry's iconic bank robbery standoff to the slow, aching finality of McCabe dying alone in the snow.

• The Car Chase — The French Connection
• Harry Foils a Bank Robbery — Dirty Harry
• The Kid Kills the Cowboy — McCabe and Mrs. Miller
• The Ludovico Technique — A Clockwork Orange
• McCabe Dies Alone in the Snow — McCabe and Mrs. Miller

Musical MomentThe nominees here demonstrate just how varied 1971's soundtrack was — Cat Stevens, Beethoven, and Gene Wilder all make the shortlist.

• Maude Sings "If You Want to Sing Out, Sing Out" — Harold and Maude
• Opening Funeral March — A Clockwork Orange
• "Pure Imagination" — Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory
• "Singin' in the Rain" — A Clockwork Orange
• The Tango — The Conformist

Best Actor The five nominees represent the full range of 1971 male performance — from Hackman's coiled rage to Wilder's heartbreaking wonder. Additionally, this category generated some of the most contested debates in the entire 1971 film podcast season.

• Warren Beatty — McCabe and Mrs. Miller
• Gene Hackman — The French Connection
• Oliver Reed — The Devils
• Jean-Louis Trintignant — The Conformist
• Gene Wilder — Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory

Best Actress Five performances across five very different films close out the awards portion of this 1971 finale podcast. Moreover, the nominees include two performances from the same film — a testament to how thoroughly McCabe and Mrs. Miller dominated the season's acting conversation.

• Julie Christie — McCabe and Mrs. Miller
• Jane Fonda — Klute
• Ruth Gordon — Harold and Maude
• Barbara Loden — Wanda
• Cybill Shepherd — The Last Picture Show

Why the 1971 Film Finale Podcast Still MattersThis 1971 film finale podcast is more than a bracket conclusion — it is a sustained argument about what cinema can achieve. The eight films that reached the Elite Eight represent a genuine cross-section of 1971's richest work: Hollywood genre filmmaking at its most visceral, European art cinema at its most seductive, American independent film at its most raw, and British provocation at its most uncompromising.

Furthermore, the awards categories reflect the full range of what made 1971 such a singular year. The Best Violence nominees alone — from Gene Hackman's frantic elevated car chase to McCabe dying alone in the snow — demonstrate how differently filmmakers approached physical conflict on screen. The Musical Moment category, meanwhile, spans Cat Stevens, Beethoven, and Gene Wilder, and each nominee makes a completely different emotional argument.

According to RogerEbert.com, several of these films — particularly The French Connection and A Clockwork Orange — remain benchmark achievements in their respective genres, and critics consistently cite them among the best films ever made. Nevertheless, the Taste Buds treat the bracket as a live debate rather than a history lesson. A lean, uncompromising film like Wanda goes toe-to-toe with a five-time Oscar winner, and the argument carries genuine stakes.

Ultimately, this episode rewards listeners who have followed the full season — and serves as an ideal entry point for anyone discovering Movie of the Year for the first time. Above all, it makes the case that 1971 stands among the most consequential single years in cinema history.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 1971* A Clockwork Orange * The French Connection * The Last Picture Show * Harold and Maude * Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory * Dirty Harry * Straw Dogs * Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song * All Movie of the Year Episodes

FAQ: 1971 Film Finale PodcastAbout This EpisodeWhat is the Movie of the Year 1971 finale episode about?

The Movie of the Year 1971 finale covers four Elite Eight matchups and the championship round, crowning the best film of 1971. Ryan, Mike, and Greg also present five major awards — Best Sex, Best Violence, Musical Moment, Best Actor, and Best Actress — before naming the season champion.

Which films competed in the 1971 Elite Eight?

The four Elite Eight matchups were: A Clockwork Orange vs. The Devils, Harold and Maude vs. McCabe and Mrs. Miller, Wanda vs. The Conformist, and The French Connection vs. The Last Picture Show.

What awards are presented in the finale?

Five awards are presented: Best Sex (Battle 90), Best Violence (Battle 91), Musical Moment (Battle 92), Best Actor (Battles 93–94), and Best Actress (Battles 93–94). Each award draws nominees from across the full 1971 season, with each Taste Bud contributing their personal picks.

Who are the Taste Buds?

The Taste Buds are Ryan, Mike, and Greg — the three co-hosts of Movie of the Year on the PopFilter podcast network. Each season they debate and rank films through a bracket tournament until one film earns the title of Movie of the Year.

About the Films and the YearWhat film won Movie of the Year 1971?

Listen to the Movie of the Year 1971 finale to find out which film the Taste Buds crowned as the best of 1971. No spoilers on this page.

Is The French Connection the best film of 1971?

The French Connection won five Academy Awards in 1972, including Best Picture and Best Director for William Friedkin — making it the year's consensus critical and commercial champion. However, the Movie of the Year bracket asks whether that consensus holds up against deeper cuts like McCabe and Mrs. Miller or Wanda. Listen to the finale to hear how the argument lands.

What are the best movies of 1971?

The Movie of the Year 1971 bracket covered a remarkable field: The French Connection, A Clockwork Orange, The Last Picture Show, Harold and Maude, McCabe and Mrs. Miller, Wanda, The Conformist, The Devils, Dirty Harry, Straw Dogs, Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song, and Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. The finale crowns the Taste Buds' pick for the best of the year.

Is Wanda (1970) eligible as a 1971 film?

Wanda premiered at the Venice Film Festival in 1970 but received its wider U.S. release in 1971 — the year the Movie of the Year bracket covers. Barbara Loden wrote, directed, and starred in the film. Critics widely regard it as a landmark of American independent cinema.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971The Finale, Part IIThe 1971 Film Bracket Podcast Reaches the Elite EightThis 1971 film bracket podcast returns with its most dramatic episode yet. Ryan, Mike, and Greg — the Taste Buds — work through the bottom half of the Sweet 16, producing four matchups that nobody saw coming. Furthermore, the episode hands out two major awards: Comedic Performance and Biggest Shithead. The results set the stage for Part III, where the Elite Eight will be whittled down to a single 1971 champion.

If you missed Part I of the finale, start there first. The bracket has been full of upsets throughout the season. Consequently, no outcome here should be taken for granted.

The Sweet 16: Bottom Half of the 1971 Film BracketThe bottom half of the 1971 Sweet 16 is stacked. These four matchups pit some of the most beloved and argued-over films in the entire bracket against one another. Moreover, the range of cinema on display — from Hollywood blockbusters to European art films to New Hollywood grit — illustrates exactly why 1971 is one of the most fertile film years ever put to a bracket.

The Taste Buds debate each matchup using their standard evaluative framework: craft, cultural impact, rewatchability, and gut feeling. Above all, they trust their instincts — and their instincts have produced surprises at every turn this season. Tune in to find out which four films advance to the Elite Eight.

Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory vs. WandaThis matchup pits one of cinema's most beloved fantasies against one of its most criminally underseen gems. Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory needs little introduction — Gene Wilder's performance alone has kept it in the cultural conversation for over fifty years. Nevertheless, Wanda is no pushover. Barbara Loden's Wanda (1971) is a raw, naturalistic landmark of American independent cinema, and its inclusion in the bracket has been a point of pride for whoever seeded it.

This is a clash of tone, scale, and intention. One film is a spectacle engineered for maximum delight. The other strips cinema down to its bones. However, the Taste Buds must pick one — and the pick will tell you something about where their tastes landed by the time the 1971 season reached its final stretch.

The French Connection vs. Brian's SongTwo films that defined what mainstream American cinema could do with raw emotional and procedural intensity. The French Connection won the Academy Award for Best Picture in 1971. It features one of the most celebrated car chases in film history and a career-defining performance from Gene Hackman as the relentless, morally compromised Popeye Doyle. Additionally, William Friedkin's direction remains a masterclass in gritty, kinetic storytelling.

Brian's Song, meanwhile, hit American living rooms as a TV movie and destroyed everyone who watched it. The story of Gale Sayers and Brian Piccolo remains one of the most emotionally devastating sports films ever made. Notably, the Taste Buds covered both films earlier this season — so this rematch in the 1971 film bracket carries the weight of all those prior arguments.

The Last Picture Show vs. KluteTwo of New Hollywood's most enduring films square off here, and neither one will go quietly. The Last Picture Show is Peter Bogdanovich's elegiac black-and-white portrait of a dying Texas town — a film the American Film Institute has called one of the greatest ever made. Furthermore, its ensemble cast, including Jeff Bridges, Cybill Shepherd, Cloris Leachman, and Ben Johnson, delivers some of the finest performances in the bracket.

Klute, however, has Jane Fonda. Her performance as Bree Daniels earned her the first of her two Academy Awards, and it remains one of the most psychologically intricate portrayals of a woman in crisis in American cinema. Alan J. Pakula's direction is coiled and paranoid in all the right ways. Consequently, this matchup may be the most difficult call in the entire bracket.

The Conformist vs. The Panic in Needle ParkThe final Sweet 16 matchup is the most arthouse of the four — and arguably the most fascinating. Bernardo Bertolucci's The Conformist is a landmark of European cinema. Vittorio Storaro's cinematography is among the most studied in film school history, and the film's meditation on fascism, identity, and moral cowardice has only grown richer with time. You can read more about the film at Roger Ebert's review on RogerEbert.com.

The Panic in Needle Park, by contrast, is bracingly American — a gritty, unglamorous portrait of heroin addiction on the streets of New York. It introduced Al Pacino to mainstream audiences. Moreover, Jerry Schatzberg's unflinching direction makes the film feel almost documentary in its honesty. These two films represent opposite ends of world cinema in 1971, and the Taste Buds must choose one.

Award: Best Comedic Performance — 1971 Film Bracket PodcastThe Taste Buds hand out individual performance awards throughout the season, and the Comedic Performance category drew a fascinating and eclectic field of nominees. The 1971 bracket is not short on laughs — from the anarchic fantasy of Willy Wonka's chocolate factory to the dark comedy of Harold and Maude. Furthermore, the nominees represent a range of comic registers, from broad physical performance to pitch-black wit.

The nominees are:

• David Battley — Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (Mike's pick)
• Julie Dawn Cole — Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (Greg's pick)
• Bud Cort — Harold and Maude (Mike's pick)
• Michael Gothard — The Devils (Ryan's pick)
• Gene Wilder — Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (Greg's pick)

David Battley's turn as the hapless Mr. Turkentine in Willy Wonka is a masterwork of bewildered reaction comedy. Julie Dawn Cole's Veruca Salt is a full-throttle comic creation — spoiled, relentless, and somehow sympathetic. Additionally, Bud Cort's Harold is a genuinely difficult comic achievement: deadpan to the point of catatonia, yet somehow enormously warm.

Michael Gothard's Father Barre in The Devils is Ryan's wild-card choice — a performance of manic, committed intensity that functions as dark comedy whether or not Ken Russell intended it. Meanwhile, Gene Wilder's Willy Wonka remains one of cinema's great comic performances — menacing, whimsical, and deeply strange all at once. The winner is waiting for you in the episode.

Award: Biggest Shithead of 1971One of the Taste Buds' most beloved recurring awards, the Biggest Shithead category recognizes the most memorably awful person — or entity — in the bracket. Notably, this award rewards commitment. Nominees do not simply do bad things. They do bad things with style, conviction, and a complete lack of self-awareness.

The nominees are:

• Baron de Laubardemont — The Devils (Greg's pick)
• The Lady at Snakearama — Duel (Ryan's pick)
• The Motorcycle Cop — Harold and Maude (Greg's pick)
• Mr. Deltoid — A Clockwork Orange (Mike's pick)
• Veruca Salt — Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (Mike's pick)

Baron de Laubardemont, the cold bureaucratic villain of The Devils, brings state-sanctioned cruelty to the category. The Lady at Snakearama from Duel is Ryan's inspired choice — a brief but indelible portrait of someone who simply should not be in this movie. Furthermore, Harold and Maude's Motorcycle Cop is a monument to institutional pettiness.

Mr. Deltoid from A Clockwork Orange is a sweaty, oleaginous masterpiece of ineffectual authority — Mike's nomination is well-argued. Veruca Salt, however, may be the category's most pure entry: a child who has elevated wanting things to an art form. The winner, as always, is in the episode.

Why This 1971 Film Bracket Podcast Still MattersThe Sweet 16 is where bracket tournaments reveal their true character. By this stage, the obvious candidates are mostly gone. What remains are the films that survived not on reputation alone but on genuine argument. Moreover, the bottom half of the 1971 Sweet 16 contains some of the season's most debated films — which means every matchup result carries real emotional weight.

The year 1971 is one of the most remarkable in cinema history. New Hollywood was hitting its stride. European art cinema was pushing form to its limits. Genre filmmaking was getting stranger, darker, and more personal. Consequently, any bracket drawn from this year produces matchups that feel genuinely impossible to call. The Taste Buds do not pretend otherwise — they argue, they agonize, and they vote.

Part III is coming. The Elite Eight will determine the Movie of the Year: 1971 champion. Above all, this episode is the last chance to see which films survive before the final reckoning. Subscribe to PopFilter and follow along — the 1971 film bracket podcast is almost at the finish line.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 1971* Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory — Movie of the Year: 1971 * The French Connection — Movie of the Year: 1971 * The Last Picture Show — Movie of the Year: 1971 * A Clockwork Orange — Movie of the Year: 1971 * Browse All Movie of the Year Episodes on PopFilter

FAQ: 1971 Film Bracket Podcast — Finale Part IIQ: What is this episode of the 1971 film bracket podcast about?

This episode covers the bottom half of the Sweet 16 bracket, featuring four matchups: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory vs. Wanda, The French Connection vs. Brian's Song, The Last Picture Show vs. Klute, and The Conformist vs. The Panic in Needle Park. Ryan, Mike, and Greg also hand out two awards: Best Comedic Performance and Biggest Shithead.

Q: Which films are in the bottom half of the 1971 Sweet 16?

The four matchups are: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory vs. Wanda, The French Connection vs. Brian's Song, The Last Picture Show vs. Klute, and The Conformist vs. The Panic in Needle Park.

Q: Who are the Taste Buds on Movie of the Year?

The Taste Buds are Ryan, Mike, and Greg — the three co-hosts of Movie of the Year on PopFilter. Each season, they use a bracket tournament format to crown the best film of a given year.

Q: Who was nominated for Best Comedic Performance of 1971?

The nominees are David Battley and Gene Wilder from Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, Julie Dawn Cole as Veruca Salt, Bud Cort in Harold and Maude, and Michael Gothard in The Devils.

Q: Who was nominated for Biggest Shithead of 1971?

The nominees are Baron de Laubardemont from The Devils, the Lady at Snakearama from Duel, the Motorcycle Cop from Harold and Maude, Mr. Deltoid from A Clockwork Orange, and Veruca Salt from Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.

Q: Is The Conformist considered one of the best films of 1971?

Yes. Bertolucci's The Conformist is widely regarded as a landmark of European cinema. Vittorio Storaro's cinematography is among the most studied in film history, and the film appears regularly on critical best-of lists.

Q: Where does Movie of the Year: 1971 go after the Sweet 16?

Four films advance to the Elite Eight. Part III of the finale will see the Taste Buds whittle the Elite Eight down to the Movie of the Year: 1971 champion.

Q: Where can I listen to all the Movie of the Year: 1971 episodes?

All episodes are available on PopFilter at popfilter.co. Browse the full season at the Movie of the Year archive, or find the show wherever you listen to podcasts.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971The Finale, Part IThe Movie of the Year 1971 Podcast Reaches Its ReckoningThe Movie of the Year 1971 podcast has arrived at its moment of reckoning. Ryan, Mike, and Greg — the Taste Buds — open the three-part finale with a full awards ceremony, a frank assessment of what 1971 means to cinema history, and the first wave of bracket eliminations. Sixteen films entered this season. Not all of them survive Part 1.

This is a different kind of episode. There is no single film to defend or dissect. Instead, the Taste Buds are doing something harder: accounting for an entire year, making choices that cannot be unmade, and sending some of the finest films ever made home without a championship. The bracket is merciless. So, it turns out, is 1971.

Part 2 continues the eliminations next week. Part 3 crowns the champion the week after. However, before any of that — the awards begin.

About This Season: Sixteen Films, One ChampionThe Movie of the Year podcast runs a bracket-style competition each season, selecting the best film from a given year. This season, the Taste Buds covered sixteen films from across the full spectrum of 1971 cinema — studio blockbusters, guerrilla filmmaking, European art cinema, and Hollywood at its most unguarded. The field represents not just a great year in film, but an ongoing argument about what movies are for.

The sixteen contenders are:

• A Clockwork Orange — Stanley Kubrick
• Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song — Melvin Van Peebles
• The Devils — Ken Russell
• Duel — Steven Spielberg
• Harold and Maude — Hal Ashby
• Straw Dogs — Sam Peckinpah
• Dirty Harry — Don Siegel
• McCabe & Mrs. Miller — Robert Altman
• Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory — Mel Stuart
• Wanda — Barbara Loden
• The Conformist — Bernardo Bertolucci
• The Panic in Needle Park — Jerry Schatzberg
• The French Connection — William Friedkin
• Brian's Song — Buzz Kulik
• The Last Picture Show — Peter Bogdanovich
• Klute — Alan J. Pakula

For every episode from this season, visit the Movie of the Year podcast archive on PopFilter.

What Does 1971 Mean to the Movies?Before any film is eliminated, the Taste Buds take a step back and ask the question the whole season has been building toward: what does 1971 actually mean to the history of cinema?

The short answer is that 1971 is the year movies stopped asking permission. The Production Code was dead, and New Hollywood was at full velocity. The studios were desperate. The filmmakers who had spent the late 1960s learning a new visual language were suddenly free to use it without restraint. Consequently, the films of 1971 are not polished products. They are arguments — about violence, about sexuality, about power, and about who gets to survive.

Moreover, 1971 is uniquely international in its ambitions. Bertolucci's The Conformist brought a European grammar of fascism and desire to mainstream audiences. Meanwhile, Melvin Van Peebles made Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song entirely outside the studio system — financing it with his own money and changing the economics of Black independent filmmaking permanently. These were not films that happened alongside American culture. They actively reshaped it.

Furthermore, the year produced an unusual number of films that resist a single reading. Dirty Harry is simultaneously a fascist power fantasy and a critique of one. Straw Dogs refuses to let its audience off the hook. The French Connection makes a hero out of a man who may not deserve the title. As a result, 1971 is defined not by its answers but by the quality of its questions.

Above all, the Taste Buds argue that 1971 matters because it remains unresolved. These films are still being debated, still being taught, still being felt. That is the mark of a year that did something real — and the reason a bracket this competitive is so hard to close.

Movie of the Year 1971 Podcast Awards: Best Supporting ActressThe first award of the finale is Best Supporting Actress. The nominees represent five performances that each, in their own way, stole scenes from films that were already remarkable. Notably, two nominees come from the same film — a testament to how fully The Last Picture Show populated its world with fully realized human beings.

The nominees for Best Supporting Actress are:

• Ellen Burstyn — The Last Picture Show
• Cloris Leachman — The Last Picture Show
• Julie Dawn Cole — Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory
• Vivian Pickles — Harold and Maude
• Stefania Sandrelli — The Conformist

Historically, the Academy nominated both Burstyn and Leachman at the 1972 Oscars — and Leachman won. However, the Taste Buds are not the Academy. Their winner reflects their own criteria, their own arguments, and a full season of watching these performances in context. Who walks away with the award? Listen to the episode to find out.

Movie of the Year 1971 Podcast Awards: Best Supporting ActorThe second award is Best Supporting Actor — a category that reads, in 1971, like a catalog of actors doing the most demanding and least comfortable work of their careers. The nominees include debut-level performances and career-defining turns alike. The competition is, by any measure, extraordinary.

The nominees for Best Supporting Actor are:

• Dudley Sutton — The Devils
• Michael Gothard — The Devils
• Jeff Bridges — The Last Picture Show
• Ben Johnson — The Last Picture Show
• Gastone Moschin — The Conformist

Ben Johnson's Sam the Lion is among the most quietly devastating performances in American film — a man who embodies everything a dying town loved and then lost. Jeff Bridges, in his first major role, announced his entire career in a single film. Gastone Moschin made fascist complicity feel not monstrous but ordinary, which is considerably more frightening. The Devils, meanwhile, sent both its nominees into material that demanded everything an actor has. To find out who wins, listen to the episode.

The Eliminations: The Bracket Does Not ForgiveThe awards are only half of Part 1 of the Movie of the Year 1971 podcast finale. The other half is the bracket — and the bracket is not sentimental. In this episode, the Taste Buds make the first wave of cuts. Films that have defined the conversation all season, films that generated genuine argument and genuine love, are sent home.

This is the nature of the format. Nevertheless, that does not make it easy. 1971 is not a year with obvious fodder. Every film in this bracket earned its place. Consequently, every elimination in this finale is a real loss — and a real statement about what the Taste Buds believe cinema can do at its best.

Which films survive? Which ones go home in Part 1? That, you will have to hear for yourself. Parts 2 and 3 continue the process — and by the end of the three-part finale, only one film from 1971 will be left standing.

Why the Movie of the Year 1971 Podcast Finale MattersA season finale is never just a conclusion. It is an act of criticism — a declaration about what mattered, what lasted, and what deserves to be remembered. The Movie of the Year 1971 podcast finale is doing that work for one of the most important years in the history of film.

Furthermore, the bracket format makes that work visible in a way that traditional film criticism rarely does. The Taste Buds cannot hedge. They cannot say everything is great and leave it there. They have to rank, eliminate, and ultimately choose. In doing so, they reveal something true about how they experience cinema — and they invite every listener to push back.

Above all, this three-part finale is a love letter to a year that refused to behave. 1971 did not make comfortable films. It did not offer easy consolations. It asked audiences to look directly at things they would have preferred to avoid. The Taste Buds have been doing the same thing all season. Now, in three parts, they are going to decide which film did it best — and which one deserves to be called the Movie of the Year.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 1971* The Last Picture Show — Movie of the Year: 1971 * A Clockwork Orange — Movie of the Year: 1971 * The French Connection — Movie of the Year: 1971 * Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory — Movie of the Year: 1971 * All Movie of the Year Episodes — PopFilter

FAQ: Movie of the Year 1971 Podcast — The FinaleWhat is this episode of the Movie of the Year 1971 podcast about?

This is Part 1 of the three-part Movie of the Year: 1971 finale. The Taste Buds hand out the first two awards of the season — Best Supporting Actress and Best Supporting Actor — discuss what 1971 means to cinema history, and make the first wave of bracket eliminations.

What films are in the 1971 Movie of the Year bracket?

The 16-film bracket includes A Clockwork Orange, Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song, The Devils, Duel, Harold and Maude, Straw Dogs, Dirty Harry, McCabe & Mrs. Miller, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, Wanda, The Conformist, The Panic in Needle Park, The French Connection, Brian's Song, The Last Picture Show, and Klute.

Who are the Taste Buds on the Movie of the Year podcast?

The Taste Buds are Ryan, Mike, and Greg — the three co-hosts of the Movie of the Year podcast, produced by PopFilter. Each season, they pick a film year and run a bracket-style competition to determine the best film of that year.

Why is 1971 considered such an important year in film?

1971 represents the creative peak of New Hollywood. With the Production Code gone and the studios in flux, filmmakers had the freedom to make morally unresolved, politically confrontational films. A Clockwork Orange, The French Connection, Klute, The Last Picture Show, and many others all appeared in the same year — an extraordinary concentration of lasting cinema.

Who were the Best Supporting Actress nominees for the Movie of the Year 1971 podcast?

The Taste Buds nominated Ellen Burstyn and Cloris Leachman (The Last Picture Show), Julie Dawn Cole (Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory), Vivian Pickles (Harold and Maude), and Stefania Sandrelli (The Conformist). Listen to the episode to hear the winner.

Who were the Best Supporting Actor nominees for the Movie of the Year 1971 podcast?

The Taste Buds nominated Dudley Sutton and Michael Gothard (The Devils), Jeff Bridges and Ben Johnson (The Last Picture Show), and Gastone Moschin (The Conformist). Listen to find out who wins.

Who directed The Last Picture Show?

Peter Bogdanovich directed The Last Picture Show, released in 1971. The film earned eight Academy Award nominations and won two — both in the supporting performance categories. It is one of the most heavily represented films in the 1971 Movie of the Year bracket, with four total nominees across the two supporting award categories.

Where can I listen to the Movie of the Year podcast?

Every episode is available on all major podcast platforms through PopFilter. The full archive lives at popfilter.co/category/movie-of-the-year/.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971Straw Dogs (feat. Erik from the Cradle to the Grave pod!)The Straw Dogs Podcast: Peckinpah's Most Dangerous FilmThe Straw Dogs podcast episode of Movie of the Year confronts one of 1971's most debated, disturbing, and relentlessly provocative films — Sam Peckinpah's psychological siege thriller starring Dustin Hoffman and Susan George. Ryan, Mike, and Greg are joined by Erik Hanson of the Cradle to the Grave podcast. Together, they examine the film's violence, its contested rape scene, and the gender dynamics at the heart of Peckinpah's vision. Consequently, no other episode this season demands more from its hosts — or from its audience.

Moreover, the 1971 film Straw Dogs arrived in remarkable company. A Clockwork Orange, Dirty Harry, and The French Connection all hit theaters the same year — forming a cluster of films that fundamentally altered what Hollywood was willing to show. Furthermore, Straw Dogs distinguished itself from all of them. Filmed entirely in a Cornish village, it replaced the city's noise with something quieter and more suffocating. Ultimately, it is a film that has never stopped demanding conversation — and that is exactly what the Taste Buds deliver.

About the FilmSam Peckinpah directed Straw Dogs (1971), starring Dustin Hoffman as David Sumner, a mild-mannered American mathematician who relocates with his English wife Amy (Susan George) to her rural hometown in Cornwall. David hires local men to repair their farmhouse. Almost immediately, however, the couple faces escalating harassment, intimidation, and violence from the villagers — including Amy's former boyfriend Charlie (Del Henney).

Peckinpah and screenwriter David Zelag Goodman adapted the film from Gordon M. Williams's 1969 novel The Siege of Trencher's Farm. Peckinpah famously dismissed the source material. The film builds to a harrowing siege in which David, pushed past every limit, defends his home with escalating brutality. Additionally, the title derives from the Tao Te Ching, which describes straw dogs as ceremonial objects — used briefly, then discarded without feeling. The Criterion Collection edition includes a discussion of this symbolism in its supplemental materials.

Released theatrically in the UK in November 1971, the film earned a nomination for the Academy Award for Best Original Score. It was later issued as a Criterion Collection release featuring new critical scholarship. The British Film Institute also maintains an entry on the film. The British Board of Film Classification banned it for home video release for years after its UK theatrical run.

Guest Panelist: Erik HansonJoining the Taste Buds for this Sam Peckinpah film discussion is Erik Hanson, the creator and host of Cradle to the Grave — a horror movie podcast built around a distinctive structural premise. Starting with 1971, his own birth year, Erik ranks and discusses his Top 10 horror films from every year of his life, covering each in depth with rotating guests. The show has developed a devoted following for Erik's knowledgeable, laid-back, and genuinely funny approach to the genre.

In addition to podcasting, Erik is the author of Death Machine, a debut horror novel set in 1987 Northern California that reimagines the Zodiac Killer returning to terrorize a group of kids. Based in Sacramento, California, Erik is also a musician. His work across fiction and podcasting reflects a lifelong relationship with horror that goes well beyond fandom and into genuine craft. Notably, the fact that Cradle to the Grave begins precisely with 1971 makes Erik an especially fitting guest for a deep dive into one of that year's most unsettling films. You can pick up Death Machine on Amazon.

Peckinpah and Violence: A Director Pushed to the EdgeBy 1971, Sam Peckinpah had already established himself as Hollywood's most uncompromising chronicler of violence. The Wild Bunch (1969) had rewritten the grammar of the Western, deploying slow-motion carnage in a way that made violence impossible to process cleanly. Straw Dogs, however, moved in a very different direction. Furthermore, Warner Bros. had effectively exiled Peckinpah from Hollywood following a chaotic falling out, which is why he filmed this Straw Dogs 1971 production entirely in England, far from his natural terrain.

The violence in Straw Dogs is not operatic like The Wild Bunch. Instead, it is domestic, intimate, and deeply uncomfortable. Peckinpah builds menace through accumulation — small humiliations, loaded glances, minor intrusions — before releasing it all in the siege. Additionally, the film implicates the audience in David's rampage by making it feel, at least in the moment, cathartic. That troubling catharsis is entirely the point. As a result, the Straw Dogs podcast discussion centers on Peckinpah's central question: whether violence is ever truly civilized, or whether it simply waits beneath the surface of every man who believes he is better than it. Roger Ebert, writing for the Chicago Sun-Times in 1971, gave the film two stars and called it a film committed to the pornography of violence while laying on moral outrage with a shovel — a dissent worth hearing even for those who disagree.

The Rape Scene: Context, Controversy, and CriticismNo discussion of Straw Dogs is complete without addressing its most contested sequence. Charlie, her former boyfriend, first assaults Amy — then a second attacker follows. What makes the scene so difficult to analyze is the way Peckinpah films the first assault. Many critics interpreted Amy's shifting emotional response during the rape as suggesting consent or complicity. That reading fueled decades of fierce feminist criticism of the Sam Peckinpah film.

Moreover, the British Board of Film Classification rejected the film for home video release for years, specifically over this content. The studio cut the scene for the US release to secure an R rating. Susan George has spoken in interviews about her complex relationship to the role and the sequence. Notably, film scholar Linda Williams frames the film within the longer history of misogynistic representation in cinema. Her analysis appears in the Criterion Collection release. She argues that Straw Dogs belongs in conversation with works that are technically significant but ethically compromised. Consequently, the scene is not a matter of simple condemnation or simple defense. It is the central wound around which the entire film's meaning turns, and the Taste Buds treat it accordingly.

David, Amy, and Gender in Straw Dogs 1971At its core, Straw Dogs is a film about masculinity in crisis. David Sumner is an intellectual — passive, avoidant, and seemingly incapable of the physical authority the Cornish village treats as natural male behavior. The film, however, refuses to position his bookishness as a virtue. Dustin Hoffman understood his character as a man who unconsciously provokes the violence around him — a pacifist whose repressed aggression the siege finally unlocks.

Amy occupies an equally impossible position. The film's gaze codes her as provocative — bare feet, no bra, conspicuous in the village — while simultaneously punishing her for that very visibility. Nevertheless, Susan George's performance introduces ambiguity and depth that the script does not always earn on its own. The dynamic between David and Amy is as much a source of tension as the men gathering outside. They seem genuinely ill-suited and miscommunicate constantly. Above all, Straw Dogs asks what gender roles cost everyone involved. Specifically, the film suggests that masculinity, however dormant, will ultimately assert itself through violence. That is Peckinpah's most unsettling argument — and one that the A Clockwork Orange episode of Movie of the Year covers from a very different angle.

Career Retrospective: Dustin HoffmanBy the time the Straw Dogs podcast era film was released in 1971, Dustin Hoffman had already fundamentally changed what a movie star could look like. His breakthrough in The Graduate (1967) — neurotic, unhandsome, deeply searching — made him a voice for a generation that distrusted certainty. Midnight Cowboy (1969) proved he could disappear entirely into character, earning his first Academy Award nomination. Little Big Man (1970) demonstrated his ability to age through an entire life on screen. Straw Dogs, therefore, marks something different in his catalog: not charm or pathos, but something colder and harder to forgive.

Hoffman's Career After Straw DogsThe films that followed deepened an already exceptional run. Papillon (1973) placed him opposite Steve McQueen in a grueling survival epic. Lenny (1974) earned him a second Oscar nomination for his portrait of Lenny Bruce — raw, relentless, and formally daring. Marathon Man (1976) and All the President's Men (1976) established his presence at the center of the decade's great paranoid cinema. Moreover, Kramer vs. Kramer (1979) brought him the Academy Award for Best Actor. Rain Man (1988) brought a second. Tootsie (1982), meanwhile, revealed a comedic fearlessness that surprised even his longtime admirers. Additionally, his obsessive method approach made him one of the defining practitioners of serious American screen acting. It was at times exhausting to collaborators, but always present on screen. Straw Dogs represents the hinge point in that trajectory. It is the moment Hoffman stopped being Benjamin Braddock and became something far more difficult to contain.

Why Straw Dogs Still MattersStraw Dogs is not a comfortable film, and Peckinpah never intended it to be. Nevertheless, it remains one of the essential texts for understanding both the New Hollywood moment and the culture that produced it. The early 1970s were a period of profound social fracture — the Vietnam War, the women's liberation movement, and the collapse of the Production Code. Straw Dogs metabolized all of that anxiety into 113 minutes of mounting dread.

Furthermore, the questions the film poses have not aged into irrelevance. What does masculinity actually protect? Who bears the cost of male violence? Can a man who believes himself civilized ever truly escape the brutality he disavows? These are urgently contemporary questions. Moreover, the Criterion Collection release has introduced the film to younger audiences. With Linda Williams's feminist scholarship and new critical conversations, they encounter it with more rigorous analytical tools than its original viewers had. Ultimately, Straw Dogs forces a reckoning: with Peckinpah's art, with cinema's relationship to violence and gender, and with the audience's own complicity in that relationship. That is what makes it irreplaceable — and what makes the Straw Dogs podcast episode one of the most essential conversations in Movie of the Year: 1971.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 1971* The Last Picture Show — Movie of the Year: 1971 * A Clockwork Orange — Movie of the Year: 1971 * The French Connection — Movie of the Year: 1971 * Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory — Movie of the Year: 1971 * Browse all Movie of the Year episodes on PopFilter

FAQ: Straw Dogs Podcast and FilmWhat is the Straw Dogs podcast episode about?

The Movie of the Year episode covers Sam Peckinpah's 1971 film Straw Dogs in depth. Ryan, Mike, Greg, and guest Erik Hanson discuss Peckinpah's philosophy of violence, the film's controversial rape scene, the gender dynamics between David and Amy, and a full career retrospective on Dustin Hoffman. It is one of the most critically demanding episodes of the 1971 bracket.

What is Straw Dogs (1971) about?

Straw Dogs follows David Sumner (Dustin Hoffman), a mild-mannered American mathematician who moves with his English wife Amy (Susan George) to her rural hometown in Cornwall. Local men hired to repair their farmhouse begin harassing and intimidating the couple. The film escalates to a brutal siege in which David is pushed past every limit he believed he had.

Who directed Straw Dogs?

Sam Peckinpah directed Straw Dogs. Peckinpah was already famous for The Wild Bunch (1969) when he traveled to England to make the film after a falling out with Hollywood studios. Peckinpah co-wrote the screenplay with David Zelag Goodman, adapting it from Gordon M. Williams's novel The Siege of Trencher's Farm.

Why was Straw Dogs banned?

The British Board of Film Classification banned Straw Dogs for home video release after the Video Recordings Act was introduced in the UK. The BBFC specifically objected to the rape sequence, in which Amy appears to respond to her assault in a way that critics argued implied consent. The BBFC twice refused the film a video certificate in 1999.

More Questions About Straw Dogs 1971What does the title Straw Dogs mean?

The title comes from the Tao Te Ching, where straw dogs are ceremonial objects treated with reverence during a ritual, then discarded without feeling once the ceremony ends. Peckinpah used this image to reflect the film's theme that people are used and thrown away by the social forces around them.

Why does David smile at the end of Straw Dogs?

After killing all the attackers, David surveys the wreckage and says, "Jesus. I got 'em all" — smiling. Dustin Hoffman understood David as a man whose pacifism concealed a repressed violence the siege finally liberated. Peckinpah did not fully share that reading, which is part of why the ending remains deliberately ambiguous.

Why does Straw Dogs still matter today?

Straw Dogs remains one of the most important films of the New Hollywood era. Its questions about masculinity, gender, violence, and complicity are as pressing now as they were in 1971. The Criterion Collection release has brought new feminist scholarship to the film, ensuring the conversation continues to grow more rigorous.

Is Straw Dogs based on a true story?

No. Straw Dogs is adapted from Gordon M. Williams's 1969 novel The Siege of Trencher's Farm, a work of fiction. Peckinpah and co-writer David Zelag Goodman retained the siege structure but rewrote the rest substantially. Peckinpah famously called the source material a "rotten book" while acknowledging that the siege itself was worth keeping.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss SongThe Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song PodcastThe Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song podcast brings Ryan, Mike, and Greg to one of 1971's most radical and uncompromising films. Melvin Van Peebles wrote, directed, produced, scored, edited, and starred in this landmark independent work — entirely outside the Hollywood system. The result is a film unlike any other in the bracket. Above all, it challenges every assumption about who gets to make movies, and why.

This week, the Taste Buds dig into three major threads: the film as a revolutionary political act, its polarizing form and style, and its complex treatment of sex and gender. Furthermore, they induct a film into the PopFilter Hall of Fame and take on Recast the Podcast. It is a wide-ranging, debate-heavy episode from first minute to last. The Movie of the Year 1971 bracket has produced bold conversations — and this one may be the boldest yet.

About the FilmSweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song follows Sweetback (Van Peebles), a Black sex-show performer raised in a brothel. When police use him as a convenient patsy, he fights back — killing two racist cops and becoming a fugitive. He runs south toward the Mexican border. Along the way, the Black community shelters him. Bikers, revolutionaries, and sex workers cross his path. Consequently, the film becomes less a conventional chase narrative and more an odyssey of Black survival and defiance.

Van Peebles privately funded the film after walking away from a studio deal at Columbia Pictures. He served as one-man auteur across every department. The film opened in just two theaters in March 1971 — Detroit and Atlanta. Nevertheless, it broke box office records on opening night and went on to gross over $15 million. The MPAA assigned it an X rating. Van Peebles turned that into the defiant tagline: "Rated X by an all-white jury." The Black Panther Party declared it required viewing for all members.

Learn more at the Wikipedia entry for Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song and the IMDb listing. The Criterion Collection has released a definitive edition of the film — explore it at Criterion.com. The American Film Institute has also recognized the film's landmark status — read the AFI Movie Club entry here.

A Movie Revolution: Van Peebles and the Politics of IndependenceVan Peebles did not simply make a film — he staged a full act of defiance. Studio backing, the ratings system, and traditional distribution were all refused outright. Moreover, he financed part of the production by borrowing $50,000 from Bill Cosby, keeping total creative control throughout. The result was a film the industry could not co-opt, contain, or dismiss. For listeners of any Melvin Van Peebles podcast or documentary, the story of how this film got made is as remarkable as the film itself.

The release strategy was equally radical. Van Peebles released the soundtrack before the film — an unusual move at the time — to build word-of-mouth in Black communities without spending money on traditional advertising. The score featured a very young Earth, Wind & Fire. By contrast, Hollywood in 1971 was still releasing social-problem films that sought respectability over truth. Sweetback rejected that approach entirely. Notably, its commercial success proved that Black-led, Black-financed films could find a massive audience without white institutional gatekeepers.

Ryan, Mike, and Greg debate what Van Peebles' revolution actually accomplished. Was it the birth of a genuinely new Black cinema? Or did it also open the door for the blaxploitation genre — a category Hollywood quickly co-opted and stripped of its radical politics? Additionally, the Taste Buds ask whether the DIY model Van Peebles pioneered holds lessons for independent filmmakers working today. As a blaxploitation film podcast discussion, this episode goes deeper than genre classification — it asks what political filmmaking actually costs.

Form, Style, and Watchability: A Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song Podcast Deep DiveThe film's style is not subtle. Van Peebles employs jagged jump cuts, kaleidoscopic superimpositions, and psychedelic sound design throughout. These choices feel closer to Jean-Luc Godard than to anything playing at an American theater in 1971. However, they also produce a film that polarizes audiences to this day. The Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song podcast tackles this polarization head-on.

Some viewers find the style exhilarating — a sustained howl of rage rendered in pure cinematic form. Others find the loose structure and repetitive sequences frustrating. The Taste Buds confront this tension directly. Furthermore, they ask whether "watchability" is even the right standard for a film that never set out to be comfortable or conventional.

The soundtrack adds another dimension entirely. Van Peebles composed and performed the score himself, with Earth, Wind & Fire providing the instrumental backing. The music pulses through the film like a second heartbeat. Consequently, sound and image work together to create a sensory experience unlike any other 1971 film in the bracket. Ryan, Mike, and Greg weigh in on whether Van Peebles' formal choices ultimately serve the film's political goals — or occasionally work against them.

Sex, Gender, and ControversySweetback's sexuality is central to the film's identity. His sexual power is his primary weapon and his means of survival. Van Peebles frames this as a form of liberation — a radical Black body asserting itself against a system designed to destroy it. However, the film's treatment of women and of queer characters draws sharp criticism from contemporary audiences.

Women in the film exist largely in relation to Sweetback's desires. The film includes graphic sexual content, some of it deeply uncomfortable by any modern standard. Moreover, the film's portrayal of lesbian characters is explicitly homophobic. The Taste Buds wrestle with how to hold these contradictions honestly. A film can be genuinely revolutionary and genuinely problematic at the same time. In fact, Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song may be the most complex example of that tension in the entire 1971 bracket.

Additionally, the film's opening sequence — depicting a child's sexual initiation — has unsettled audiences for over fifty years. Van Peebles cast his own son Mario in the role. That decision raises serious ethical questions that Ryan, Mike, and Greg do not avoid. Ultimately, the conversation around sex and gender in this film is not a comfortable one — and that discomfort is precisely what makes it essential. This is one of the most challenging discussions in the 1971 film podcast series to date.

PopFilter Hall of FameEach season of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds set aside the bracket to recognize films that define an era. The PopFilter Hall of Fame is not about winning a head-to-head matchup. It honors the films that changed cinema itself — the ones that opened doors, broke rules, and made everything that came after possible.

The Hall of Fame carries special weight in this episode. Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song raises the question of what "greatness" means for films that operate outside mainstream critical frameworks. A film does not need to be comfortable, polished, or widely loved to be important. The Hall of Fame exists precisely to honor that distinction. This week, the hosts make their cases for a 1971 inductee. Tune in to hear which film earns the honor — and whether all three Taste Buds can agree on the pick.

Recast the PodcastIn Recast the Podcast, Ryan, Mike, and Greg take on one of cinema's great thought experiments. They choose a film and rebuild the cast from scratch — drawing on actors from any era, any genre, any corner of film history. Each host makes their picks. Then the debate begins.

Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song presents a unique challenge for Recast the Podcast. The film was defined by Van Peebles' decision to cast himself. Sweetback's blank-faced, nearly wordless presence was a deliberate choice — not a performance in the conventional sense, but a statement. Who could step into that role today? Who has the gravity, the physicality, and the political weight to carry the film's central conceit? The Taste Buds bring their full range of cinematic knowledge to the question. Listen in to hear their picks, the reasoning behind each choice, and where the three hosts inevitably disagree.

Why Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song Still MattersSweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song was never meant to be easy. Van Peebles built it as a provocation — a film that demanded a response. More than fifty years later, it still gets one. The film's influence runs through Spike Lee, John Singleton, Ava DuVernay, and virtually every Black filmmaker who followed. However, its importance is not only historical. The questions it raises about representation, power, and who controls the means of production are still urgent today.

Furthermore, the film's DIY model anticipated the independent film movement by decades. Van Peebles proved that a filmmaker could retain complete creative control, bypass the studio system entirely, and still reach an enormous audience. That lesson has never gone out of date. Additionally, Sweetback himself — flawed, largely silent, unrepentant — remains one of American cinema's most unusual protagonists. He wins not through argument or moral clarity but through sheer, stubborn survival.

Above all, the Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song 1971 podcast episode asks what it means to call a film a masterpiece — and whether that category can contain a film this deliberately rough and confrontational. The Taste Buds disagree, debate, and ultimately reckon with a work that defies easy answers. That conversation is worth having again and again. If you are new to this 1971 film podcast series, this episode is an ideal place to understand what Movie of the Year is really about.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 1971* The Last Picture Show — Movie of the Year: 1971 * A Clockwork Orange — Movie of the Year: 1971 * The French Connection — Movie of the Year: 1971 * Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory — Movie of the Year: 1971 * Browse all Movie of the Year episodes on PopFilter

FAQ: Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song Podcast and FilmWhat is the Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song podcast episode about?

Ryan, Mike, and Greg discuss Melvin Van Peebles' 1971 film on the Movie of the Year: 1971 podcast. They cover the film's revolutionary production model, its challenging form and style, and its complex treatment of sex and gender. The episode also features a PopFilter Hall of Fame induction and a Recast the Podcast segment.

What is Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song about?

The film follows Sweetback, a Black sex-show performer who kills two racist police officers and becomes a fugitive. He flees south toward Mexico while the Black community shelters him along the way. Above all, it is an odyssey of survival, rage, and liberation from white institutional oppression.

Who directed Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song?

Melvin Van Peebles directed, wrote, produced, scored, edited, and starred in the film. He funded it privately and distributed it independently — entirely outside the Hollywood studio system. No other major American film of 1971 was made under those conditions.

Why does Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song still matter?

The film permanently changed Black cinema. It proved that a Black filmmaker could produce, distribute, and profit from a film without white institutional support. Moreover, its influence runs through decades of American filmmaking. The questions it raises about representation, power, and artistic freedom remain as relevant now as they were in 1971.

More About the Film and the EpisodeIs Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song a blaxploitation film?

The film is often cited as the origin point of the blaxploitation genre. However, many scholars argue it stands apart. Van Peebles made it as an independent political act with full creative control and no studio involvement. By contrast, most blaxploitation films were Hollywood products that borrowed the surface aesthetics without the radical politics underneath.

How much did Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song make at the box office?

The film opened in just two theaters in March 1971. It went on to gross over $15 million — a massive commercial success for an independently financed and distributed production. It outperformed many studio films of the same year.

What rating did Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song receive from the MPAA?

The MPAA assigned the film an X rating. Van Peebles responded by printing the tagline "Rated X by an all-white jury" on the film's promotional materials. Notably, the rating became part of the film's radical identity rather than a commercial obstacle.

What is Movie of the Year on PopFilter?

Movie of the Year is a bracket-style podcast on PopFilter in which hosts Ryan, Mike, and Greg — the Taste Buds — debate and vote on the best film from a given year. The current season covers 1971. Each week, the hosts discuss a different bracket film and work toward a championship decision. Explore all episodes at the Movie of the Year archive on PopFilter.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971Harold and Maude (feat. Van from the Gaymer Girls pod!)The Harold and Maude podcast episode is here — and the Taste Buds are diving deep into one of 1971's most subversive and life-affirming films. Hal Ashby's Harold and Maude (1971) has been a cult touchstone for over fifty years. This episode gives it the full PopFilter treatment. Ryan, Mike, and Greg welcome guest panelist Van Baumann from the Gaymer Girls podcast for a conversation about this singular film. It baffled studios, bombed at the box office, and somehow became a defining work of American cinema. Furthermore, this episode features a Rushmore segment on the most iconic May-December romances in movie history, plus a Shopping Spree. Consequently, this is one of the most spirited episodes of the Movie of the Year: 1971 series.

About the Harold and Maude FilmDirected by Hal Ashby, Harold and Maude arrived in December 1971 as one of the most unusual films Paramount Pictures had ever released. The screenplay, written by Colin Higgins, began as his master's thesis at UCLA film school. It follows Harold Chasen (Bud Cort), a wealthy young man obsessed with death. Harold stages elaborate fake suicides to shock his emotionally absent mother. Moreover, he fills his days with funerals, hearses, and junkyards — searching for something authentic in a world of suffocating privilege. At one such funeral, he meets Maude (Ruth Gordon), a 79-year-old woman. Her boundless appetite for life stands in complete contrast to his morbid worldview. Above all, their unlikely friendship — and eventual romance — challenges every social convention the Hal Ashby 1971 film can find.

The Harold and Maude film bombed on initial release. Critics were baffled, and audiences didn't know what to make of it. Nevertheless, it found its audience through midnight screenings and college campuses, eventually becoming one of cinema's defining 1971 cult classics. The Cat Stevens Harold and Maude soundtrack became inseparable from the film's identity. Notably, the Criterion Collection released a full restoration on Blu-ray in 2012. That cemented its status as a genuine classic. You can explore the full credits at its IMDb page.

Guest Panelist: Van BaumannVan Baumann joins the Taste Buds for this Harold and Maude podcast episode. She co-hosts Gaymer Girls — a weekly podcast covering gaming, queer culture, and pop culture. Van and co-host Sana cover topics ranging from Baldur's Gate 3 to LGBTQ+ representation in gaming. Their wit and expertise extend to the cultural politics of the industry as well. Moreover, the show specializes in IP deep-dives for newcomers. Long-running franchises get broken down in ways that are accessible, funny, and genuinely informative.

Van's perspective on the Harold and Maude film is a particularly fitting one. The 1971 cult classic resonates strongly with queer audiences for its anti-establishment energy and rejection of conventional romance. Additionally, her background in gaming culture and media criticism brings a fresh lens to Ashby's film. It is a perspective the Taste Buds couldn't provide on their own.

Harold and Maude as Characters: An Unlikely Mirror in a Harold and Maude Podcast DiscussionAt the heart of the Harold and Maude film are two characters who could not appear more different on paper. Harold is young, wealthy, and surrounded by privilege — yet profoundly miserable. Maude is elderly and owns almost nothing. She has lived through extraordinary hardship. The film subtly implies she is a Holocaust survivor. However, both characters share a fundamental rejection of the life society has scripted for them. Harold's fake suicides are acts of rebellion against his mother's indifference. Meanwhile, Maude steals cars and uproots city trees without malice. She acts from a deep belief that the world belongs to everyone equally.

Ruth Gordon's performance is magnetic. Gordon plays Maude not as a quirky old woman. Rather, she portrays someone who earned every ounce of joy through survival and deliberate choice. Bud Cort embodies Harold's blankness with quiet precision. His deadpan delivery makes every small shift in the character feel earned. Consequently, the chemistry between them feels less like a conventional romance and more like a transmission. Maude passes something essential to Harold before her time runs out. The Taste Buds and Van explore what makes these characters so enduring. Both discuss why the film still resonates more than fifty years later.

Life and Philosophy: What the Harold and Maude 1971 Film Actually TeachesHarold and Maude is, at its core, a film about choosing to live. Specifically, it argues that joy is not something handed to you — it is something you practice, steal, nurture, and defend. Maude embodies this philosophy in every scene. She makes art and plays music with equal passion. Furthermore, she transplants a struggling tree from a concrete sidewalk to the open forest. She believes living things deserve better conditions than city concrete. Above all, she treats every encounter as an opportunity rather than an obligation.

The Hal Ashby 1971 film engages with existentialism in a remarkably accessible way. It never lectures. Instead, it dramatizes the tension between Harold's death drive and Maude's life force. The audience feels the shift as the film progresses. In addition, Harold and Maude is bracingly anti-authoritarian — Harold's priest, his psychiatrist, and his militaristic uncle are all buffoons. Authority, Ashby and Higgins suggest, is part of what kills the spirit. Therefore, the film's philosophy is ultimately about sovereignty: the right to live, love, and die on your own terms. The Taste Buds unpack all of it across this Harold and Maude podcast episode.

Legacy: How the Harold and Maude 1971 Podcast Goes Deep on a Cult IconFew films have had a stranger journey from flop to icon. The Harold and Maude film opened to near-universal bewilderment in 1971. Paramount barely knew how to market it. Nevertheless, word of mouth — particularly among countercultural and college audiences — kept it alive. By the late 1970s, it was a staple of midnight movie circuits. By the 1980s, it had influenced a generation of filmmakers. Notably, Wes Anderson has cited it as a key influence on his film Rushmore. Both films center on unlikely intergenerational bonds.

Moreover, the 1971 cult classic has always commanded a substantial queer following. Its rejection of normative romance, its celebration of chosen family, and Maude's radical individuality have made it a touchstone for LGBTQ+ audiences for decades. Additionally, the Cat Stevens Harold and Maude soundtrack is among cinema's most celebrated. Stevens later converted to Islam and stepped back from this earlier work. Above all, Harold and Maude endures because it offers something rare: a film that insists life is worth living, and actually means it. For a bracket-style podcast covering the greatest films of 1971, this Hal Ashby film demands serious consideration.

Rushmore: The Most Iconic May-December Romances in Movie HistoryIn this week's Rushmore segment, each panelist makes their case for the most iconic May-December romance in movie history. The prompt is inspired by the film itself — cinema's most famous age-gap romance. However, the Taste Buds range far beyond 1971 for their nominations. Furthermore, the debate gets heated fast as the panel navigates decades of Hollywood romance to crown their personal MVPs. Tune in to find out who made the cut — and whose picks got laughed out of the room.

Shopping SpreeThe Taste Buds and Van also sit down for a Shopping Spree segment, one of PopFilter's beloved recurring features. Each participant brings a recommendation that pairs well with the episode's themes. Films, media, and cultural artifacts are all fair game. In addition, the segment is a chance for the panel to let their enthusiasms run free outside the main discussion. Notably, the Harold and Maude Shopping Spree delivers some particularly inspired picks. Listen in to find out what made the list.

Why Harold and Maude Still MattersMore than fifty years after its release, the Harold and Maude film remains one of the most emotionally honest ever made. It refuses to sentimentalize death or romanticize youth. Instead, it argues that wisdom, joy, and love have no age limit. Choosing to be fully alive, it suggests, is the most radical act of all. Moreover, in an era of increasing conformity and algorithmic culture, Maude's anarchic embrace of experience feels more urgent than ever.

The 1971 cult classic also matters as a document of its moment. 1971 was a year of profound cultural friction. The counterculture was fading, the Vietnam War continued, and a deep national anxiety had taken hold. Harold and Maude absorbed all of that tension and responded with something unexpected: grace. Consequently, it stands as one of 1971's most essential films and a worthy contender in PopFilter's Movie of the Year bracket. Additionally, Van Baumann's perspective adds a dimension the Taste Buds alone couldn't provide. This Harold and Maude podcast episode is a must-listen for fans of film and philosophy.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 1971* The Last Picture Show (1971) — another film about youth, longing, and the passage of time * A Clockwork Orange (1971) — Kubrick's equally transgressive and controversial 1971 release * The French Connection (1971) — the year's Best Picture winner * Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (1971) — another enduring 1971 cult classic * Browse all Movie of the Year episodes

FAQ: Harold and Maude Podcast and FilmWhat is this Harold and Maude podcast episode about?

This episode of PopFilter's Movie of the Year: 1971 series covers Hal Ashby's cult classic Harold and Maude. Ryan, Mike, and Greg are joined by guest Van Baumann from the Gaymer Girls podcast. Together they discuss the film's characters, its philosophy, and its lasting legacy. The episode also features a Rushmore segment on May-December romances and a Shopping Spree.

What is Harold and Maude about?

Harold and Maude (1971) follows Harold Chasen, a death-obsessed young man from a wealthy family. He befriends and ultimately falls in love with Maude, a free-spirited 79-year-old woman. Together, they challenge social convention, and Maude teaches Harold to embrace life on his own terms.

Who directed Harold and Maude?

Harold and Maude was directed by Hal Ashby. Colin Higgins wrote the screenplay, originally as his master's thesis at UCLA film school. Paramount Pictures released it in December 1971.

Who stars in Harold and Maude?

The Harold and Maude film stars Ruth Gordon as Maude and Bud Cort as Harold. Vivian Pickles plays Harold's mother, and Tom Skerritt appears in a supporting role. Cat Stevens composed and performed the film's celebrated soundtrack.

More Questions About Harold and MaudeWhy did Harold and Maude become a cult classic?

Harold and Maude flopped on initial release but found a passionate audience through midnight screenings and college campuses. Over time, its anti-establishment philosophy and Cat Stevens soundtrack made it a beloved 1971 cult classic. It has since influenced countless filmmakers, including Wes Anderson.

Is Harold and Maude considered an LGBTQ+ film?

While not explicitly an LGBTQ+ film, Harold and Maude has long resonated with queer audiences. Its rejection of normative romance and celebration of chosen family have made it a longtime LGBTQ+ touchstone.

Who is the guest on this Harold and Maude podcast episode?

The guest panelist is Van Baumann, co-host of the Gaymer Girls podcast — a weekly show covering gaming news, queer culture, and IP deep-dives. Van brings a fresh critical perspective to the Harold and Maude film alongside the PopFilter Taste Buds.

Why does Harold and Maude still matter today?

Harold and Maude endures because its core argument remains radical and necessary. Life, it insists, is worth living on your own terms. Its themes of autonomy, chosen love, and defiant joy speak across generations and cultures.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971Dirty Harry (feat. Conor Kilpatrick from iFanboy!)The Dirty Harry podcast arrives this week on Movie of the Year: 1971, as the Taste Buds take on one of the most influential and contested crime films ever made. Don Siegel's thriller introduced the world to Inspector Harry Callahan — a San Francisco cop who operates on instinct, fury, and a very large handgun. Moreover, the film sparked a debate about justice, civil liberties, and the price of order that has never fully quieted. The Taste Buds are joined by Conor Kilpatrick of iFanboy for this Don Siegel Dirty Harry analysis, and they also cover 1971 ProStars and a special segment on the year in comic books.

Episode Show Notes: What We CoverThis Dirty Harry 1971 film discussion covers a lot of ground. Below is a summary of the key talking points from the episode — a roadmap for listeners and a reference for anyone who wants to dig deeper after the fact.

On Harry Callahan as a character: The panel opens by asking whether Harry is actually a hero or whether the film simply frames him as one. Conor argues that Eastwood's performance is so controlled and interior that the audience does the work of making Harry sympathetic — the film barely has to try. Ryan pushes back: Harry's righteousness is earned on screen because he is always right in his read of a situation, even when he is wrong in his methods. Mike lands somewhere in between, pointing out that Harry's body count by the end of the first film is genuinely troubling if you stop and count.

On politics and the law: The Taste Buds spend significant time on Pauline Kael's famous "fascist" critique and whether it holds up. The consensus is that the film is more ambiguous than Kael allowed — but that the ambiguity is doing real work, and not always in a reassuring direction. The legal system in Dirty Harry is not just flawed; it is portrayed as an active obstacle to justice. That framing has consequences.

On San Francisco: The panel discusses how Don Siegel uses the city as a visual argument — the geography of the chase scenes, the specific choice of Kezar Stadium as a set piece, and what it means to set this particular story in the city that had been the symbolic capital of American idealism just four years earlier.

On 1971 in comics: Conor breaks down the Marvel vs. DC landscape of the year, the significance of the Spider-Man drug arc, and why Jack Kirby's Fourth World still does not get the mainstream recognition it deserves. Additionally, he and the Taste Buds find real thematic overlap between the comics and the film: both are grappling with institutions that have failed and individuals who step into the void.

About the FilmDirty Harry (1971) was directed by Don Siegel and stars Clint Eastwood as Inspector Harry Callahan of the San Francisco Police Department. The film follows Callahan as he hunts the Scorpio Killer — a sadistic serial murderer loosely inspired by the real-life Zodiac Killer — while clashing repeatedly with a city bureaucracy unwilling to bend the rules. Harry has no such hesitation. Andrew Robinson plays Scorpio with chilling, unhinged intensity. The film's cat-and-mouse structure keeps the tension taut from its rooftop opening shot through its iconic waterfront finale.

Furthermore, Dirty Harry arrived at a fraught cultural moment. Crime rates in major American cities were rising sharply. Public trust in government and police was eroding. Consequently, the film's portrait of a cop who gets results by any means necessary struck a powerful nerve. For more context alongside this Dirty Harry podcast, explore the full production history on the film's IMDb page.

Produced by Warner Bros. and Malpaso Productions, the film features a propulsive score by Lalo Schifrin. Dirty Harry launched a five-film franchise and cemented Clint Eastwood as one of cinema's defining icons of controlled menace. It remains among the most debated American films of its era — a movie that means different things depending entirely on who is watching it. Listeners who enjoy this Dirty Harry podcast episode might also want to revisit our discussion of The French Connection, another 1971 film that wrestles with law enforcement, moral ambiguity, and the limits of the justice system.

Guest Panelist: Conor Kilpatrick of iFanboyJoining the Taste Buds this week is Conor Kilpatrick, co-founder and longtime host at iFanboy — one of the most enduring comics media platforms on the internet. Conor co-founded iFanboy around 2000 alongside Josh Flanagan and Ron Richards, originally as a college email chain where friends traded weekly comic reviews. That chain became a website, then a podcast, then a 25-year institution in the comics world. Known as the "DC Guy" of iFanboy, Conor has spent decades explaining infinite Earths, multiple reboots, and the craft of visual storytelling with genuine enthusiasm and expertise. He brings that same depth of knowledge to the Dirty Harry podcast discussion this week.

He is also the co-host of the Goodfellas Minute podcast and a co-founder of Great Northern Media. Moreover, his deep knowledge of 1971 comics makes him the ideal guest for this episode's special segment. His perspective on the cultural landscape of 1971 — what was happening in comics while Dirty Harry was in theaters — adds a dimension to this Dirty Harry 1971 film discussion that no other guest could bring. Welcome to Movie of the Year, Conor.

Harry Callahan: The Dirty Harry Podcast's Central DebateHarry Callahan is one of American cinema's most complicated figures. On the surface, he is a blunt instrument — a man who solves problems with a .44 Magnum and withering silence. However, Siegel and Eastwood invest him with something far more ambiguous. Harry is genuinely competent, even brilliant, at what he does. The tragedy is that the system he serves refuses to reward competence over politics.

Eastwood's performance is famously economical. He does not grandstand or seek sympathy. Notably, that restraint is precisely what makes Harry magnetic — audiences fill in the emotional gaps themselves, projecting onto a man who reveals almost nothing voluntarily. The Taste Buds discuss whether Harry reads as a hero, an antihero, or something the film itself cannot quite name. For contrast, consider how Gene Hackman's Popeye Doyle in The French Connection presents a similarly brutal cop — but one the film regards with considerably more irony.

The "Do you feel lucky, punk?" monologue is among the most quoted speeches in 1970s cinema. Nevertheless, it is more than a catchphrase. It is a masterclass in character — Harry performing certainty he may not entirely feel, using psychology as a weapon when firepower is temporarily unavailable. Above all, it reveals a man who understands power in all its forms and deploys it with surgical precision.

Politics, Justice, and the Law: A Don Siegel Dirty Harry AnalysisFew films from 1971 generated more critical controversy than Dirty Harry. Pauline Kael famously called it a fascist work of art in her widely-discussed review. Others defended it as a frank reckoning with a legal system too broken to protect its own citizens. Consequently, the film sits at the center of a political argument that has never fully resolved itself.

The film's central tension is not, ultimately, between Harry and Scorpio. It is between Harry and the law itself. Time and again the legal system fails — releasing Scorpio on procedural grounds, blocking the investigation, prioritizing process over lives. Harry's response is to act outside those constraints entirely. Moreover, the film frames him as righteous for doing so, and that is precisely what troubled critics at the time.

However, the Taste Buds push on this carefully. Does Dirty Harry endorse vigilantism, or does it simply portray it with unflinching honesty? The ending — Harry throwing his badge into the water — complicates any easy reading. Therefore, rather than celebrating his methods without reservation, the film may ultimately acknowledge that Harry's approach destroys him even as it saves others. This Don Siegel Dirty Harry analysis explores that tension without settling for easy answers. Listeners interested in how 1971 cinema handled political disillusionment should also visit our episode on A Clockwork Orange, which confronts similar questions from a radically different angle.

San Francisco: A City in the WestSan Francisco is not merely a backdrop in Dirty Harry. It is a character. Don Siegel shoots the city with documentary precision — rooftops, construction sites, Kezar Stadium, winding streets, and the cold grey of the bay. As a result, San Francisco's geography becomes an extension of the film's moral landscape: beautiful, treacherous, and full of places the law cannot easily reach.

The city of 1971 was in deep transition. The Summer of Love had long since curdled. The Zodiac murders had unsettled the Bay Area for years. Political radicalism and cultural exhaustion existed side by side on the same streets. Consequently, Dirty Harry captures San Francisco at a specific, anxious moment — a city that had been the center of utopian dreaming, now uncertain of what came next.

Furthermore, the West as a setting carries mythic weight in American film. Harry Callahan operates in the tradition of the frontier lawman — a figure who enforces order at the edges of civilization, where official authority cannot follow. In practice, San Francisco becomes Harry's frontier, and the Scorpio Killer becomes his outlaw. The Taste Buds explore in this Dirty Harry podcast how that Western iconography shapes both the film's power and its long legacy. For another 1971 film steeped in American mythology and landscape, see our episode on The Last Picture Show.

1971 ProStarsPro Stars was a 1991 Saturday morning cartoon featuring Michael Jordan, Wayne Gretzky, and Bo Jackson as globe-trotting superhero athletes fighting crime and environmental villains. The Taste Buds' recurring 1971 ProStars segment asks one irresistible question: if that show had aired twenty years earlier, which three superstar athletes would have anchored it? Moreover, the rules are the same — one athlete per major team sport, each a genuine crossover icon recognizable far beyond their own arena. This week the panel makes their case for the 1971 starting lineup, and the debate is exactly as spirited as you would expect.

1971 in Comic BooksWith Conor Kilpatrick of iFanboy in the room, this episode takes a special detour into the world of comics. 1971 was a pivotal year for the medium — arguably one of the most consequential in its history. Notably, it was the year Marvel Comics defied the Comics Code Authority by publishing an anti-drug storyline across three issues of The Amazing Spider-Man, a moment widely credited with beginning the dismantling of the Code's stranglehold on the industry.

Meanwhile, DC Comics was in the midst of its own creative explosion. Jack Kirby's "Fourth World" saga launched in full — New Gods, The Forever People, and Mister Miracle all debuted in 1971. Furthermore, underground comix were thriving entirely outside the mainstream, reflecting the same countercultural tensions that run through Dirty Harry itself. Conor brings deep expertise to this segment, placing 1971's comics in direct conversation with the broader cultural moment. Additionally, he and the Taste Buds identify real thematic overlap: both Dirty Harry and the comics of 1971 are grappling with institutions that have failed and individuals who step into the void left behind.

Why Dirty Harry Still MattersDirty Harry endures because the questions it raises have not gone away. How much authority should the state grant individuals to enforce the law? What happens when legal systems fail the people they exist to protect? Moreover, what does it cost — morally, personally — to operate outside the rules in service of a greater good?

These are not abstract questions. They are live debates, argued today in police departments, courtrooms, and legislatures across the country. Consequently, Dirty Harry functions as a Rorschach test — audiences see in it what they bring to it. Some see a hero. Others see a warning. Above all, the film refuses to make that judgment easy, and that productive discomfort is precisely what keeps it alive.

Clint Eastwood's performance remains a landmark of screen acting. The economy of his work — the way he communicates Harry's intelligence, weariness, and controlled fury through posture and silence — influenced a generation of action performances. Additionally, for listeners of this Dirty Harry podcast, Don Siegel's direction rewards close attention — it is a model of clean, purposeful genre filmmaking. Dirty Harry is, in the end, a near-perfectly made film in service of deeply imperfect ideas. That tension is exactly what great cinema does. For more on how 1971 cinema wrestled with moral complexity, visit our full Movie of the Year archive.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 1971* The Last Picture Show — Movie of the Year: 1971 * A Clockwork Orange — Movie of the Year: 1971 * The French Connection — Movie of the Year: 1971 * Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory — Movie of the Year: 1971 * Browse All Movie of the Year Episodes

FAQ: Dirty Harry Podcast and FilmWhat is this Dirty Harry podcast episode about?

The Taste Buds — Ryan, Mike, and Greg — are joined by Conor Kilpatrick of iFanboy to discuss Don Siegel's 1971 crime thriller Dirty Harry. Topics include the character of Harry Callahan, the film's politics and treatment of the justice system, and San Francisco as both setting and symbol. The episode also features the 1971 ProStars segment and a special discussion on the year in comic books.

What is Dirty Harry (1971) about?

Dirty Harry follows San Francisco Police Inspector Harry Callahan as he hunts the Scorpio Killer, a serial murderer holding the city hostage. As Harry closes in, the legal system repeatedly blocks his pursuit on procedural grounds. Ultimately, Harry is forced to choose between the law and justice — and the film refuses to make that choice comfortable for anyone watching.

Who directed Dirty Harry?

Dirty Harry was directed by Don Siegel, the prolific filmmaker also known for Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) and Escape from Alcatraz (1979). Siegel and Eastwood had previously collaborated on Coogan's Bluff (1968) and developed a working relationship that defined the look and tone of the Dirty Harry franchise.

What gun does Dirty Harry use?

Harry Callahan carries a Smith & Wesson Model 29 chambered in .44 Magnum — famously described in the film as "the most powerful handgun in the world." The gun became as iconic as the character himself and contributed to a significant real-world spike in .44 Magnum sales following the film's release. The Model 29 appears in all five Dirty Harry films.

What does "Do you feel lucky, punk?" actually mean?

The line — more precisely "You've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya, punk?" — is Harry using psychology as a weapon. He has already fired several shots and may or may not have one bullet remaining. By making the criminal do the math out loud, Harry wins the confrontation without firing. It reveals that Harry's most dangerous weapon is not the gun — it is his ability to control the psychological space of a situation.

Why did critics call Dirty Harry fascist?

Film critic Pauline Kael wrote a widely-read review arguing that Dirty Harry used the conventions of the crime thriller to endorse authoritarian policing and vigilante justice. The film's sympathetic framing of Harry's extralegal methods — and its portrayal of the legal system as an obstacle rather than a safeguard — fueled that critique. However, many defenders argue the film is more ambiguous than Kael allowed, particularly given its ending.

View Details

Coming Soon

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971Willy Wonka and the Chocolate FactoryWilly Wonka and the Chocolate Factory podcast fans, this one is for you. Ryan, Mike, and Greg are joined by special guest Matt Singer of ScreenCrush to revisit one of 1971's most beloved and most debated films on Movie of the Year. In addition, Mel Stuart's musical fantasy has frightened and delighted children and adults in equal measure for over fifty years. This episode also features Movie Trivia and a PopFilter Hall of Fame: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory induction.

About the FilmRoald Dahl based the film on his 1964 novel Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. The story follows young Charlie Bucket, who wins a golden ticket and tours the mysterious factory of the eccentric Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka. Notably, Dahl wrote the screenplay himself — and then disowned the finished film. He objected to the liberties the production took with his story and his vision for the character. As a result, that tension between author and adaptation makes this a particularly rich film to revisit.

Before diving in, check out our recent episodes on The Last Picture Show, A Clockwork Orange, and The French Connection for more from the Movie of the Year 1971 series.

Guest Panelist: Matt Singer of ScreenCrushMatt Singer joins the Taste Buds for this episode. He serves as editor and film critic at ScreenCrush and holds membership in the New York Film Critics Circle. Singer spent five years as the on-air host of IFC News on the Independent Film Channel. He has also contributed to CBS This Morning Saturday, Ebert Presents at the Movies, The Village Voice, and The Dissolve. Furthermore, he won a Webby Award for his work on IFC.com and authored Opposable Thumbs: How Siskel & Ebert Changed Movies Forever.

Matt Singer's New Book: Funny BusinessHis latest book is Funny Business, out in October. It covers the comedy films of the 2000s — Old School, Zoolander, The 40-Year-Old Virgin, Superbad, The Hangover, and more. Pre-order it now. Moreover, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory ranks among Singer's four all-time favorite films on Letterboxd. Consequently, this is not just any guest — Singer has thought deeply about this film for a very long time.

Willy Wonka 1971 Podcast Discussion: Genre and ToneThe first major topic of this Willy Wonka 1971 podcast discussion is the question that has divided audiences since opening day: what kind of film is this, exactly? The studio marketed it as a children's musical fantasy. In practice, however, it delivers something far stranger and more unsettling. The boat tunnel sequence alone has scared generations of young viewers. Moreover, the tone shifts without warning from whimsical to genuinely threatening. Gene Wilder's performance keeps the audience perpetually off-balance throughout.

Ryan, Mike, Greg, and Matt Singer dig into how Mel Stuart navigated the tension between studio ambitions and the source material. They also examine the complicated role of Roald Dahl as screenwriter — a man who shaped the film's darkest edges and then rejected the result. For more on the film's production history on IMDB, the details prove just as strange as the movie itself.

What Gene Wilder Brings to Willy WonkaAbove all, the panel examines what Gene Wilder brings to the role that no other actor has replicated. His Wonka radiates warmth that sits one beat away from menace — and a menace that sits one beat away from warmth. No other performer has threaded that needle. For a full look at Wilder's career, therefore, visit his IMDB page.

Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory: Kids vs. AdultsOne of the central questions of this episode is who Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory actually targets. On the surface, it presents itself as a children's film. In practice, though, it rewards adult viewing in ways that most children's films never attempt. The satire cuts deep, the darkness feels genuine, and Wonka makes much more sense to a viewer who no longer roots for Charlie as a pure hero.

The panel explores the film through both lenses. As children, most of them fell for the candy and feared the tunnel. As adults, by contrast, they find something else entirely — a film about power, punishment, and the thin line between a visionary and a tyrant. Additionally, they discuss how the film shifts meaning depending on which version of yourself sits in the audience, and why that quality remains so rare.

Capitalism, Conformity, and Other -Isms in Willy Wonka 1971Beneath the chocolate and the Oompa Loompas, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory has a great deal to say about the world. The children who fail Wonka's tests are not simply bad kids. Instead, they embody consumer culture, class anxiety, and parental failure. Augustus Gloop represents excess. Violet Beauregarde embodies competitive ambition. Veruca Salt carries unchecked privilege. Meanwhile, Mike Teavee absorbs media saturation. Each child faces punishment not for being a child, but for playing the role of a particular kind of adult in miniature.

Ryan, Mike, Greg, and Matt Singer examine what the film says about capitalism, conformity, and the systems that shape children before they can question them. In addition, they take on the troubling labor politics of the Oompa Loompas — workers paid in cacao beans, housed inside their employer's factory, and sent out to deliver moral lectures on demand. It is a lot to unpack. Nevertheless, this episode unpacks all of it.

For more critical context on the film's themes, visit RogerEbert.com.

Movie Trivia: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory EditionThis episode features a special Movie Trivia segment. Did you know that Gene Wilder agreed to play Wonka only if the character could limp — so audiences could never fully trust him? Or that the chocolate river used real chocolate and cream, and quickly turned rancid on set? Or that Roald Dahl refused to authorize a sequel after the studio ignored his objections to the first film?

As a result, the Taste Buds and Matt Singer test their full knowledge of the film. They cover casting history, behind-the-scenes stories, and the many ways the finished film diverged from Dahl's original vision. Even devoted fans will likely learn something new.

PopFilter Hall of Fame: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate FactoryThis episode also features a PopFilter Hall of Fame: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory induction. The panel makes their case for which element of the film deserves permanent enshrinement — whether that is Gene Wilder's performance, a specific scene, a song, or something else entirely. Tune in to find out what makes the cut.

Why the Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory Podcast Discussion Still MattersMore than fifty years after its release, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory stands as one of the most enduring and genuinely strange films in the American canon. It grows with you. Specifically, it means something different at seven, at seventeen, and at forty-seven. Few films can make that claim.

Ultimately, this Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory podcast episode revisits the film not just as a 1971 classic, but as a living text that continues to reward close attention. With Matt Singer in the mix, expect sharp criticism, genuine passion, and at least one strong opinion about the Fizzy Lifting Drinks scene.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 1971If you enjoyed this episode, check out the rest of the Movie of the Year 1971 series:

1. The Last Picture Show — Bogdanovich, nostalgia, and a dying Texas town
2. A Clockwork Orange — Kubrick, free will, and the limits of the state
3. The French Connection — Friedkin, Popeye Doyle, and the meaning of justice
4. Browse all Movie of the Year episodes

FAQ: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory Podcast and FilmWhat is the Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory podcast episode about?

Ryan, Mike, Greg, and guest Matt Singer discuss the 1971 film. They cover genre and tone, how it plays differently for kids versus adults, and its themes of capitalism and conformity. The episode also includes Movie Trivia and a PopFilter Hall of Fame induction.

What is Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory about?

It follows Charlie Bucket, a poor boy who wins a golden ticket to tour Willy Wonka's mysterious chocolate factory. Four other children join him, and each one faces consequences that reveal their deepest flaws.

Who directed Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory?

Mel Stuart directed the 1971 film. Roald Dahl wrote the screenplay from his own novel — and later disowned the finished product.

Who plays Willy Wonka in the 1971 film?

Gene Wilder plays Willy Wonka. His performance stands as one of the most distinctive and irreplaceable in cinema history.

How does the 1971 Willy Wonka compare to the 2005 and 2023 versions?

The 1971 film holds the strongest reputation of the three. Tim Burton's 2005 version with Johnny Depp takes a darker, more clinical approach. The 2023 prequel with Timothée Chalamet reimagines Wonka as a young idealist. Neither version, however, captured the strange, unsettling warmth that Gene Wilder brought to the original role.

Is Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory based on a book?

Yes. Roald Dahl wrote the 1964 source novel Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. He also wrote the screenplay, but later disowned the film.

Why is the boat tunnel scene in Willy Wonka so scary?

Gene Wilder insisted on the freedom to make Wonka genuinely unpredictable. The tunnel sequence expresses that impulse most clearly. As a result, it has scared children and fascinated adults ever since.

What does Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory say about capitalism?

The film uses its child characters as stand-ins for the failures of consumer culture. Meanwhile, the Oompa Loompas raise uncomfortable questions about labor and exploitation that the film never fully resolves.

Who is Matt Singer?

Matt Singer serves as editor and film critic of ScreenCrush and holds membership in the New York Film Critics Circle. He authored Opposable Thumbs: How Siskel & Ebert Changed Movies Forever and the forthcoming Funny Business, out in October. Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory ranks among his four all-time favorite films.

View Details

This week's French Connection podcast episode covers one of the most thrilling and morally complicated films of 1971. Ryan, Mike, and Greg revisit The French Connection on Movie of the Year. William Friedkin's Best Picture winner changed what American cinema thought a hero could look like. In addition, this episode features a special Gene Hackman career retrospective.Released in 1971, the film follows New York City detective Jimmy "Popeye" Doyle — based on real NYPD detective Eddie Egan, with partner Sonny Grosso inspiring the character of Russo. Doyle pursues a massive heroin operation with little regard for the law or the people around him. As a result, the film won five Academy Awards, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor. It remains one of the defining films of the New Hollywood era.

This Movie of the Year podcast episode is one of the most anticipated of the 1971 season. Before diving in, check out our recent episodes on The Last Picture Show and A Clockwork Orange.

Joining the Taste Buds for this episode is special guest C. Craig Patterson A screenwriter, director, and filmmaker based in Los Angeles. An alum of Columbia University, NYU's Tisch School of the Arts, and USC's School of Cinematic Arts, Patterson brings serious cinematic credentials to the table. His short film Fathead won the Cannes Film Festival Best Student Short Award and earned an NAACP Image Award nomination. His scripts have been recognized by the Sundance Screenwriters Lab, The Black List, and the Academy's Nicholl Fellowship. Patterson also directed the critically acclaimed Roy Wood Jr. comedy special Imperfect Messenger for Paramount+. With projects currently in development at Paramount and Epic Games, he is one of the most exciting emerging filmmakers working today — and exactly the kind of guest who makes a film like The French Connection worth revisiting.

The French Connection 1971 Podcast: Popeye Doyle — Hero, Antihero, or Something Worse?The central tension of this French Connection 1971 podcast discussion is what to make of Popeye Doyle. Gene Hackman plays him as a force of nature — relentless, racist, reckless, and completely compelling. He is not a good man, and he is barely a good cop. Nevertheless, the film frames his obsession as heroic, his instincts as genius, and his victory as worth celebrating.

Ryan, Mike, and Greg dig into what Friedkin and screenwriter Ernest Tidyman were doing with Doyle. Is the film a critique of the kind of law enforcement he represents? Or is it simply in love with him? The answer is probably both. Ultimately, that ambiguity is what makes the character so difficult and so fascinating fifty years later.

The Real Detectives Behind the StoryThe real detectives, Eddie Egan and Sonny Grosso, consulted on the film and even appear in small roles. Consequently, knowing the story is grounded in a real investigation makes Doyle's behavior harder to dismiss. These were not fictional excesses invented for dramatic effect, and the panel takes that seriously.

Gene Hackman won the Academy Award for Best Actor for this role, beating out Peter Finch, Walter Matthau, George C. Scott, and Topol. Furthermore, it remains one of the most celebrated performances of the 1970s. The panel uses this episode to look back at Hackman's broader career and make the case for where he stands in the pantheon.

For more on Gene Hackman's career, visit the Internet Movie Database.

William Friedkin and the New Hollywood Crime FilmDirector William Friedkin approached The French Connection as a documentary-style thriller. He shot on location in New York City with handheld cameras and natural light, refusing to glamorize either the city or its characters. As a result, the film feels unlike almost anything else from 1971 — raw, kinetic, and deeply uncomfortable.

The Taste Buds explore how Friedkin's direction shaped the film's identity. Most notably, the legendary car chase under the elevated train tracks in Brooklyn is widely considered one of the greatest action sequences ever filmed. Friedkin shot it on live New York City streets without fully stopping traffic, with a camera mounted to the front of the car. For critical analysis of the chase, the Criterion Collection offers essential reading.

Friedkin After The French ConnectionJust two years later, Friedkin directed The Exorcist, cementing his place as one of the defining filmmakers of the decade. The panel discusses what the two films share and what The French Connection reveals about Friedkin's sensibility. In both cases, his camera feels like it is barely keeping up with reality — and that is entirely by design.

For more on Friedkin's influence on American cinema, visit the American Film Institute.

The French Connection Podcast Discussion: Justice and Its LimitsAt its core, The French Connection is about the gap between justice and the law. Popeye Doyle operates outside the rules, endangers civilians, shoots an unarmed man in the back, and ultimately fails to bring the main target to justice. Despite all of this, the film presents his pursuit not as tragedy but as the cost of doing business.

Ryan, Mike, and Greg examine what the film says about the American justice system in 1971 — a moment of profound national disillusionment. Vietnam, the civil rights movement, and the early signs of Watergate were all in the air. Meanwhile, the "good guys" in this film are not good, the "bad guys" are not caught, and the audience is asked to root for the pursuit anyway.

Race and Policing in The French ConnectionMoreover, the film's racial politics are impossible to ignore. Doyle's racism is presented as character texture rather than moral failing, and the film never fully grapples with the implications of the policing it depicts. That discomfort is an important part of the conversation this week.

For historical context on the real case, visit the DEA's history of the French Connection.

Gene Hackman Best Performances: A Career RetrospectiveThis episode includes a special segment on Gene Hackman's best performances. The Taste Buds make their case for the defining Hackman roles and debate his greatest work. In particular, they discuss what made him such an unusual screen presence: his everyman quality, his capacity for rage, and his refusal to tell the audience how to feel about his characters.

His breakthrough came in Bonnie and Clyde in 1967, and his Oscar followed here in The French Connection. Subsequently, classics like The Conversation, Mississippi Burning, Unforgiven, and The Royal Tenenbaums cemented one of the most extraordinary bodies of work in American cinema. This segment celebrates an actor who never got quite enough credit for how good he really was.

Why The French Connection 1971 Still MattersMore than fifty years later, The French Connection remains essential viewing. Beyond its technical achievements, it functions as a moral document — capturing a specific American mood: exhausted, suspicious, and uncertain about its own institutions.

Ultimately, this French Connection podcast episode revisits the film as a living argument about power, obsession, and the stories we tell about law enforcement. It asks hard questions, and this episode doesn't let them off the hook.

Related Episodes from Movie of the Year: 1971If you enjoyed this episode, check out the rest of the Movie of the Year 1971 series:

1. The Last Picture Show — Bogdanovich, nostalgia, and a dying Texas town
2. A Clockwork Orange — Kubrick, free will, and the limits of the state
3. Browse all Movie of the Year episodes

FAQ: The French Connection Podcast and FilmWhat is The French Connection podcast episode about?

Ryan, Mike, and Greg discuss William Friedkin's 1971 Best Picture winner. Topics include Popeye Doyle, Friedkin's direction, justice, and a Gene Hackman career retrospective.

What is The French Connection about?

It follows NYPD detective Popeye Doyle, based on real detective Eddie Egan, as he pursues a massive heroin smuggling operation using methods that are often illegal and always reckless.

Who directed The French Connection?

William Friedkin directed the 1971 film and went on to direct The Exorcist two years later.

How many Oscars did The French Connection win?

Five: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor (Gene Hackman), Best Film Editing, and Best Adapted Screenplay.

Is The French Connection based on a true story?

Yes. It is based on Robin Moore's 1969 book about the real investigation by NYPD detectives Eddie Egan and Sonny Grosso into a French heroin ring in the early 1960s.

What makes the car chase in The French Connection so famous?

Friedkin filmed it on live New York City streets with a camera mounted to the front of the car. It is widely considered one of the greatest and most dangerous action sequences ever filmed.

Why is Gene Hackman's performance so celebrated?

Hackman plays Popeye Doyle as a flawed, driven, occasionally reprehensible human being. The performance refuses to make him likable while making him impossible to look away from.

Who were the real detectives behind The French Connection?

NYPD detectives Eddie Egan and Sonny Grosso led the real investigation. Both consulted on the film and appear in small on-screen roles.

View Details

Few films in the history of cinema have provoked as much discomfort — and as much genuine philosophical debate — as A Clockwork Orange. Stanley Kubrick's 1971 adaptation of Anthony Burgess's dystopian novel arrives like a punch to the temple: stylized, brazen, and engineered to make you complicit in its protagonist's point of view before you've had a chance to object.

Alex DeLarge, played by Malcolm McDowell with an almost seductive ferocity, is not an antihero in the conventional sense. He's a rapist and murderer who narrates his own crimes with lyrical delight. And yet Kubrick frames him with such wit, such visual command, that discomfort becomes almost pleasurable — which is, of course, entirely the point.

On this episode of Movie of the Year, we engage with the three central tensions that make the film impossible to dismiss: the philosophical minefield of morality and free will, the sheer sensory experience of watching it, and the film's deeply troubled relationship with women and sexuality.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971The Last Picture ShowRevisiting The Last Picture ShowIn this episode of Movie of the Year: 1971, Ryan, Mike, and Greg revisit The Last Picture Show, Peter Bogdanovich’s landmark film about youth, loneliness, and a fading Texas town.

Released in 1971, the film helped define the early New Hollywood era, blending classical Hollywood craftsmanship with a more modern emotional realism. From its black-and-white cinematography to its quiet performances, this portrait of small-town America remains one of the most discussed films of its decade.

Peter Bogdanovich and a Changing American CinemaDirector Peter Bogdanovich approached the film as both a tribute to classic cinema and a break from it. Drawing on older storytelling traditions while embracing the moral ambiguity of the 1970s, he created a work that feels suspended between eras.

The Taste Buds explore how Bogdanovich’s direction captures the melancholy of a town in decline and how his cinephile instincts shape the movie’s visual language. In doing so, the film becomes a bridge between old Hollywood nostalgia and the more personal filmmaking that defined the decade.

For more on Bogdanovich’s influence, see the American Film Institute:

https://www.afi.com

Love and Sex in The Last Picture ShowOne of the film’s most enduring elements is its honest portrayal of intimacy. Love and sex are not romanticized; they are awkward, transactional, vulnerable, and deeply human.

Ryan, Mike, and Greg examine how the characters navigate desire and disappointment. Whether it’s teenage experimentation or adult loneliness, relationships in this story reveal more about isolation than fulfillment. That emotional candor is part of why the movie still resonates today.

For historical background and cast details, visit Turner Classic Movies:

https://www.tcm.com

The Generational Gap and a Fading TownAt its core, this 1971 drama is about transition. Older characters cling to memory and routine, while younger ones struggle to imagine their future beyond the town’s limits.

The panel discusses how the generational divide shapes the narrative, turning a coming-of-age story into a meditation on cultural change. The closing of the town’s movie theater becomes symbolic—a quiet acknowledgment that an era is ending.

IP Freely: Star Wars Meets 1971This episode also debuts a new segment called IP Freely, where the panel imagines modern franchise films directed by filmmakers working in 1971. The Taste Buds pitch hypothetical Star Wars entries through the stylistic lens of early-70s auteurs.

The exercise highlights just how dramatically cinematic tone and scale have shifted since this film’s release.

Rushmore: 1971 It GirlTo close the show, Ryan, Mike, and Greg assemble a Mount Rushmore of the 1971 It Girl, celebrating the performers who defined the year’s screen presence and cultural energy.

Why The Last Picture Show Still MattersMore than five decades later, The Last Picture Show remains essential viewing. Its exploration of youth, longing, and generational change captures a moment when American cinema was reinventing itself.

This episode revisits the film not just as a classic of 1971, but as a living text that continues to influence how audiences understand small-town storytelling and emotional realism.

FAQWhat is The Last Picture Show about?

It follows teenagers and adults in a declining Texas town, exploring love, loneliness, and generational transition.

Who directed The Last Picture Show?

Peter Bogdanovich directed the 1971 film.

Why is it important?

It helped define the early New Hollywood movement and won multiple Academy Awards.

Is it based on a novel?

Yes, it is adapted from Larry McMurtry’s novel.

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of the Year 2025Best Movie of the YearThe Best Movies of 2025 Face OffWhat are the Best Movies of 2025?

That question drives the biggest episode of the Movie of the Year season.

Hosted by Ryan and joined by Mike, Cassie, and Greg, this flagship episode brings together 25 of the most talked-about films of the year in a massive competitive bracket designed to determine one definitive answer: what is the Best Movie of 2025?

This is not a ranked list.

It’s not a polite retrospective.

It’s a full-scale movie showdown.

Twenty-five contenders enter the bracket.

One film leaves as Movie of the Year.

Why the Best Movies of 2025 Are Hard to DefineThe Best Movies of 2025 come from everywhere: theatrical releases, streaming premieres, international cinema, prestige dramas, comedies, franchise entries, and bold originals. This year in film refuses easy categorization.

To qualify, a film simply had to:

1. release in 2025
2. make a real cultural or artistic impact
3. hold up under comparison with the year’s strongest work

Sequels compete with originals.

International films face studio giants.

Streaming releases battle theatrical spectacles.

Everything is on the table.

The 25-Film BracketThe bracket for the Best Movies of 2025 includes a wide-ranging field representing the full landscape of modern cinema. Among the contenders:

1. One Battle After Another
2. Sinners, one of the most discussed films of 2025
3. No Other Choice
4. The Secret Agent
5. It Was Just an Accident
6. Weapons, a major genre standout
7. The Naked Gun
8. and many more filling out the 25-film field

Each matchup forces direct comparison. Reputation alone isn’t enough to advance.

Bracket Battles: How the Best Movies of 2025 Are DecidedEvery round of the bracket asks the same core question:

Which film actually deserves to be remembered when we talk about the Best Movies of 2025?

Debates center on:

1. directing vision
2. performance strength
3. originality
4. cultural impact
5. rewatchability
6. long-term staying power

Ryan drives the bracket forward. Mike focuses on craft. Cassie champions bold swings and emotional impact. Greg looks for longevity and structural strength.

No film advances without a fight.

What Is the Best Movie of 2025?As the bracket narrows, favorites fall, and unexpected contenders rise. Prestige releases collide with genre filmmaking. Big swings face meticulous craftsmanship. By the final round, only two films remain.

From there, one movie is crowned the Best Movie of 2025.

No spoilers here.

You’ll have to listen to find out which film survives.

Why the Best Movies of 2025 MatterThe movie landscape of 2025 is crowded and fragmented. Streaming, theatrical, and international releases compete for attention at a pace that makes it hard to keep up. This episode cuts through the noise.

By forcing direct comparisons, the bracket reveals which films truly defined the year and which simply dominated conversation. The result is a definitive snapshot of the Best Movies of 2025 and how they stack up against each other.

Other Major 2025 EpisodesIf you’re exploring the full year in entertainment, continue with:

1. Best Horror Movies of 2025
2. Best Television Shows of 2025
3. Best Unscripted Shows of 2025
4. 2025 Year in Review – Century of the Year
5. 2025 Mixtape

Together, these episodes create a complete 2025 pop culture time capsule.

FAQ: Best Movies of 2025What is the Best Movie of 2025?

This episode crowns one definitive winner after a full 25-film bracket.

Are streaming movies included?

Yes. All platforms and release types are eligible.

Are international films included?

Yes. Films from all countries compete equally.

Is this a ranked list?

No. It’s a competitive elimination bracket ending with one winner.

Final Verdict on the Best Movies of 2025By the end of the episode, one film stands above the rest. Through argument, comparison, and elimination, the panel determines the Best Movies of 2025 and names the official Movie of the Year.

If you want the clearest possible answer to what defined cinema this year, this is the episode.

Listen, Subscribe, and Join the Debate🎧 Listen now to hear the full Best Movies of 2025 bracket

📩 Email your picks: popfilterco@gmail.com

⭐ Subscribe to Movie of the Year for more year-end episodes

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of the Year 2025Best TV Show of the YearThe Best Television Shows of 2025 Enter the ArenaThe Best Television Shows of 2025 didn’t rise to the top by accident. They survived hype cycles, second-season expectations, streaming saturation, and cultural overload.

In this episode of Movie of the Year, Greg hosts a 16-seed competitive bracket—with play-ins—to determine the Best Television Shows of 2025. Joining him are Cassie, Ryan, Mackenna, and Mike, ready to debate prestige drama, ambitious limited series, breakout comedies, and the year’s most talked-about streaming hits.

This isn’t just a 2025 TV year in review.

It’s a showdown.

Sixteen scripted contenders enter.

One show leaves as the best TV show of 2025.

What Counts as the Best Television Shows of 2025?This bracket includes:

1. Returning seasons like Andor (Season 2) and Severance (Season 2)
2. Limited series such as Adolescence
3. Bold new scripted debuts
4. Comedy, drama, satire, and genre television
5. Network, cable, and streaming releases
6. International series (though primarily English-language)

If it aired in 2025 and was scripted, it was eligible. The goal: determine the top television series of 2025 across all platforms.

The 16-Seed Bracket and Play-In RoundsBefore the bracket locks, two play-in battles determine the final spots in the field. The play-ins ensure that no prestige favorite automatically advances and that breakout surprises earn their place.

Once finalized, the bracket includes:

1. The Pitt
2. Andor (Season 2), one of the most anticipated streaming shows of 2025
3. Pluribus
4. The Rehearsal (Season 2), pushing formal experimentation
5. Adolescence, a standout limited series of 2025
6. Severance (Season 2), a defining second season
7. The Lowdown
8. Dying for Sex
9. Long Story Short
10. The Studio

Every matchup forces hard choices. Reputation means nothing without performance.

Bracket Battles: Prestige vs RiskAs the eliminations unfold, several themes emerge:

1. Can a second season surpass its original impact?
2. Does a limited series compete differently from an ongoing drama?
3. Is cultural buzz equal to narrative achievement?
4. Do streaming shows dominate the best TV shows of 2025 conversation?

Greg maintains structure. Cassie pushes for ambition. Ryan defends emotional resonance. Mackenna highlights audience connection. Mike dissects craft and execution.

The format separates hype from longevity and distinguishes conversation from quality.

What Is the Best Television Show of 2025?The central question of the episode becomes unavoidable:

What is the Best Television Show of 2025?

Through quarterfinals, semifinals, and a final clash, the bracket narrows. The discussion sharpens. The arguments become more precise.

Ultimately, one series emerges as the definitive winner among the Best Television Shows of 2025.

No shared podium.

No split vote.

One champion.

Why the Best Television Shows of 2025 MatterTelevision in 2025 is fragmented across platforms, genres, and release models. Determining the best TV shows of 2025, ranked through competition, forces clarity.

Across the bracket, the standout series share:

1. narrative ambition
2. tonal confidence
3. strong ensemble performances
4. formal experimentation
5. staying power beyond premiere week

This episode serves as both a competitive bracket showdown and a thoughtful 2025 TV year in review.

FAQ: Best Television Shows of 2025What is the Best Television Show of 2025?

The episode crowns one clear winner after a full 16-seed bracket.

Are limited series included?

Yes. Limited series like Adolescence compete alongside multi-season dramas.

How does the bracket work?

Play-in rounds finalize the field, followed by elimination matchups until one show remains.

Are streaming and international shows eligible?

Yes. All platforms and countries were eligible.

Internal Links for More 2025 CoverageIf you’re catching up on the full 2025 coverage, also check out:

1. Best Horror Movies of 2025
2. Best Unscripted Shows of 2025
3. 2025 Year in Review – Century of the Year
4. 2025 Mixtape

Together, these episodes form a complete 2025 year-in-review podcast slate.

Final Verdict: The Best Television Shows of 2025When the dust settles, the bracket delivers a decisive answer to the season’s biggest question. This episode doesn’t hedge. It names the Best Television Show of 2025 outright.

If you care about prestige drama, bold streaming experimentation, or the evolution of limited series, this competitive showdown delivers clarity.

Listen, Subscribe, and Join the Debate🎧 Listen now to hear the full Best Television Shows of 2025 bracket

📩 Email your picks (or outrage): popfilterco@gmail.com

⭐ Subscribe to Movie of the Year for more Best of the Year 2025 episodes

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of the Year 2025Best Unscripted TV Show of the YearThe Best Unscripted Shows of 2025The Best Unscripted Shows of 2025 reflect a television landscape that is bigger, stranger, and more carefully constructed than ever. In this episode of Movie of the Year, Mike hosts a high-stakes bracket to determine which unscripted series truly stood above the rest, joined by panelists Cassie, Greg, and Mackenna.

Eight shows enter the bracket, spanning competition series, long-running institutions, comfort viewing, and chaos engines. What follows is a sharp, opinionated unscripted TV year in review, focused on craft, format, and why these shows continue to dominate the cultural conversation.

Why “Unscripted” Matters More Than “Reality” in 2025Early in the episode, the panel draws a clear distinction: unscripted is the better word.

In 2025, unscripted television includes:

1. competition shows built on structure and fairness
2. formats refined through years of iteration
3. personality-driven series that reward consistency
4. shows designed for communal viewing

The Best Unscripted Shows of 2025 aren’t judged on mess alone. They’re judged on execution.

The 8-Show Bracket: All Platforms RepresentedThe contenders competing for the title of Best Unscripted Show of 2025 are:

1. The Traitors
2. Game Changer
3. The Great British Baking Show
4. Project Runway
5. Not Her First Rodeo
6. Taskmaster
7. Love Island USA
8. Below Deck

Network, cable, streaming, and niche platforms all collide here. No show advances on nostalgia alone, and no platform gets preferential treatment.

Bracket Battles: Competition, Comfort, and ChaosAs eliminations begin, the debates sharpen quickly.

Some unscripted shows dominate through:

1. airtight format design
2. fairness and repeatability
3. long-term audience trust

Others succeed through:

1. personality
2. escalation
3. social dynamics
4. controlled chaos

Mike pushes the panel to separate enjoyment from achievement. Cassie argues for innovation and tone. Greg interrogates longevity and consistency. Mackenna focuses on watchability and audience loyalty. Every matchup forces a real question: what makes an unscripted show great in 2025?

What Defines the Best Unscripted Shows of 2025Across the bracket, a clear set of standards emerges:

1. the format must sustain tension
2. the rules must be legible
3. the show must reward repeat viewing
4. the experience must feel intentional, not disposable

The Best Unscripted Shows of 2025 prove that this genre isn’t filler between prestige dramas—it’s some of the most precise television being made.

Which Is the Best Unscripted Show of 2025?After multiple rounds and no shortage of disagreement, one series emerges as the clear winner.

No ties.

No qualifiers.

No “it depends.”

The final choice reflects the panel’s belief in format strength, cultural relevance, and staying power. To hear which show survives the bracket—and why—it’s time to listen.

Why This Episode MattersThis isn’t a trash-TV roundup.

It’s a serious look at why unscripted television thrives when scripted TV often struggles.

As a Best Unscripted Shows of 2025 discussion, the episode doubles as a snapshot of how audiences engage with television now: socially, competitively, and consistently.

FAQ: Best Unscripted Shows of 2025What is the Best Unscripted Show of 2025?

The episode crowns a single winner after an 8-show bracket.

What counts as unscripted television?

Competition shows, docu-reality, and format-driven series across all platforms.

Are streaming shows included?

Yes. Network, cable, and streaming series all compete equally.

Listen, Subscribe, and Tell Us We’re Wrong🎧 Listen now to hear the full Best Unscripted Shows of 2025 bracket

📩 Email your picks or disagreements: popfilterco@gmail.com

⭐ Subscribe to Movie of the Year for more 2025 year-end episodes

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of the Year 2025Century of the YearA 2025 Year in Review in Real TimeEvery year tells a story — but rarely this fast.

In this special episode of Movie of the Year, the panel presents 2025 – Century of the Year, a bold and chaotic 2025 year in review that attempts something simple, ambitious, and wildly entertaining: 100 of the biggest moments of the year, discussed in just 100 minutes.

This isn’t a countdown.

It isn’t a competition.

It’s a real-time replay of the year as it unfolded.

If you’re looking for a 2025 year-in-review podcast that values memory over rankings and chaos over consensus, this episode delivers.

What This 2025 Year in Review CoversAcross 100 minutes, the episode touches on a wide range of moments that defined the year, including:

1. major film releases and pop-culture events
2. TV moments that dominated conversation
3. internet and media chaos
4. stories that felt huge in the moment
5. robot chickens

The goal isn’t to judge what mattered most — it’s to remember what actually happened, when it happened.

The Format: 100 Moments, 100 MinutesUnlike traditional year-end lists, Century of the Year moves chronologically, creating a true 2025 year in review rather than a retrospective ranking.

Each moment gets:

1. one minute
2. one burst of conversation
3. One chance to capture why it mattered then

January flows into February, February into March, and suddenly the year is racing by. The format mirrors how 2025 actually felt: relentless, noisy, and impossible to fully process in real time.

Who’s on the MicTo keep pace with the format, Movie of the Year brings together a full PopFilter lineup:

1. Greg
2. Mike
3. Ryan
4. Cassie, host of The Superhero Show Show
5. Katelynn
6. Mackenna

With six voices rotating through the moments, the episode becomes a rolling conversation — jokes collide with reflection, and no one has time to overthink. The result is a loose, funny, and surprisingly emotional 2025 year-in-review podcast.

Why Century of the Year Is a 2025 Year in Review Unlike Any OtherThere are no winners.

No awards.

No arguments to settle.

Instead, this episode leans into playful chaos. One minute forces instinct. Tangents get cut short. Opinions are stated boldly and sometimes abandoned just as quickly. That’s not a flaw — it’s the design.

This 2025 year in review captures how memory actually works: incomplete, emotional, and shaped by timing as much as importance.

A Chronological Time Capsule of 2025Traditional year-end content flattens time.

This episode restores it.

By moving forward instead of counting down, 2025 – Century of the Year shows how early-year moments echo later ones, how narratives evolve, and how the year’s meaning changes as it unfolds.

By the final minute, listeners have effectively lived through the year again — a full 2025 year in review preserved as a time capsule rather than a verdict.

FAQ: 2025 Year in Review – Century of the YearWhat is the Century of the Year?

It’s a Movie of the Year special episode covering 100 moments from the year in 100 minutes.

Is this a ranking or a “best of” list?

No. It’s a chronological recap, not a competition.

What makes this different from other 2025 year-in-review shows?

The format emphasizes speed, memory, and real-time reaction rather than hindsight judgment.

Why This 2025 Year in Review MattersYears blur together.

Moments don’t.

This 2025 year-in-review captures the noise, contradictions, jokes, shocks, and emotions that defined the year — not as a polished list, but as it actually felt to live through it.

Fast. Messy. Human.

Listen, Subscribe, and Relive the Year🎧 Listen now to experience the full 2025 year in review

📩 Email us the moment you think we missed: popfilterco@gmail.com

⭐ Subscribe to Movie of the Year for more 2025 recap episodes and deep dives

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of the Year 2025The MixtapeThe 2025 Mixtape as a Time CapsuleEvery year leaves behind more than movies — it leaves a sound.

In this episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds come together to create the 2025 Mixtape, a curated playlist designed to capture what the year felt like through music. Rather than ranking songs or chasing chart placement, the panel builds a living soundtrack that reflects the moods, moments, and cultural undercurrents of 2025.

The goal of the 2025 Mixtape isn’t consensus.

It’s memory.

What the 2025 Mixtape Is (and Is Not)The 2025 Mixtape isn’t about declaring “the best songs of the year” in isolation. It’s about sequencing, contrast, and flow — how songs interact when placed side by side, how energy builds or collapses, and how a playlist can tell a story.

This episode explores questions like:

1. What song opens the year?
2. Where does the emotional peak land?
3. When does the mixtape need to slow down?
4. And what track closes the door on 2025?

The playlist is treated as a narrative, not a ranking.

Choosing Songs That Define 2025As selections are made, the panel debates what qualifies a song for inclusion on the 2025 Mixtape. Is it cultural impact? Longevity? Personal obsession? Or the ability to instantly transport listeners back to a specific moment in the year?

The conversation weighs:

1. singles versus deep cuts
2. mainstream hits versus discoveries
3. songs that grew over time versus immediate standouts

Together, the picks form a portrait of how music functioned in daily life throughout 2025.

Genre, Mood, and the Shape of the YearOne of the episode’s central tensions is the extent to which the musical landscape of 2025 is truly diverse. The 2025 Mixtape moves across genres, tones, and emotional registers, reflecting a year that resisted easy categorization.

The discussion touches on:

1. pop’s evolving extremes
2. hip-hop’s shifting center
3. Indie music’s changing role
4. genre-blurring experimentation
5. and songs that moved from background noise to personal anthems

The result is a playlist that mirrors the year’s complexity rather than flattening it.

Flow Matters: Sequencing the 2025 MixtapeMore than any single song, sequencing becomes the battleground. A great track can still feel wrong if it breaks momentum or disrupts the mood. The panel debates transitions, tonal shifts, and the extent to which a listener can handle emotional whiplash.

This is where the episode gets deeply nerdy — and deeply satisfying.

The 2025 Mixtape isn’t just assembled.

It’s designed.

Why the 2025 Mixtape MattersYears blur together.

Playlists don’t.

The 2025 Mixtape is an attempt to preserve a feeling — something listeners can return to years from now and immediately remember how the year sounded, what mattered, and what lingered. It’s subjective by design, imperfect by necessity, and meaningful because of it.

Listen, Save the Playlist, and Share Yours🎧 Listen now to hear the full 2025 Mixtape come together

📩 Email us your own version: popfilterco@gmail.com

⭐ Subscribe to Movie of the Year for more year-in-review episodes

🎶 And tell us which song had to be on the tape

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of the Year 2025Best Horror Movie of the Year2025 Horror Movies and the Fight to Crown a ChampionThe world of 2025 horror movies is a battlefield, and in this episode of Movie of the Year, Mike, Ryan, and Taylor wage war over which film deserves to stand above the rest. Instead of assembling a list or reading off favorites, the panel builds a brutal bracket to determine the best horror movie of 2025 — from studio monsters to indie nightmares to streaming shocks.

This isn’t just a celebration — it’s a confrontation.

Sixteen titles enter.

One claims the crown.

What Horror Means in 2025: Defining the GenreBefore the eliminations begin, the panel confronts the evolution of horror in 2025.

Is horror now:

1. a metaphor for social collapse?
2. a space for spiritual terror?
3. a conduit for bodily dread?
4. Or simply the movie that makes your heart race and palms sweat?

2025 horror movies refuse to stay in one lane.

The conversation traces how audiences now crave:

1. original horror films over sequels
2. daring stylistic swings
3. unpredictable stories
4. atmosphere over explanation
5. new monsters and mythologies

This episode takes seriously the project of defining what horror in 2025 feels like.

The 16 Films Competing for Best Horror Movie of 2025This year’s bracket includes a mix of theatrical releases, streaming originals, and buzzy festival darlings hoping to break through.

The contenders for best horror film of 2025 include:

1. Sinners(religious terror with real teeth)
2. The Ugly Stepsister (fairy tale dread reimagined)
3. Good Boy, a streaming sleeper hit with claws
4. The Monkey, a Stephen King adaptation built for nightmares
5. Frankenstein, prestige monster cinema reborn
6. Death of a Unicorn, indie black magic meets satire
7. Bring Her Back, folk horror with bite
8. Wolf Man, classic creature feature updated
9. Weapons, conceptual terror from filmmakers pushing boundaries
10. I Know What You Did Last Summer, the latest evolution of the reboot
11. Companion, don’t-look-away psychological dread
12. The Shrouds, Cronenberg-tinged existential rot
13. 28 Years Later, the long-awaited apocalypse continuation
14. The Conjuring: Last Rites, the franchise’s closing exorcism
15. Final Destination: Bloodlines, fatalism done fresh
16. Presence, minimalist supernatural anxiety

Every movie enters the ring with a chance to win—until someone eliminates it.

Which Film Will Be Crowned the Best Horror Movie of 2025?Bracket eliminations begin, and the knives come out.

This year’s bracket is designed to expose taste, blind spots, and biases.

Upsets are inevitable.

Favorites fall early.

Beloved films don’t get a pass simply because audiences showed up on opening weekend.

Patterns emerge:

1. Sequels struggle against original concepts
2. Indies land harder punches than anyone expected
3. Prestige horror keeps growing
4. Streaming horror competes toe-to-toe with theatrical releases
5. And certain titles prove more resilient than anyone thought

Mike comes ready with structured and crafted arguments.

Ryan defends the morally twisted, bleak, unforgettable entries.

Taylor stakes her claim on the films nobody saw coming.

When emotions flare, so do eliminations.

The State of Horror in 2025: Themes and TrendsAcross the bracket, one portrait becomes clear:

2025 is a genuinely great year for horror movies.

This episode surfaces key trends:

1. Original horror dominates sequels
2. Folk and myth-based horror resurfaces
3. Religious fear returns in force
4. Indies drive imagination and innovation
5. Prestige stars are taking bigger swings
6. Streaming is no longer second-tier
7. And monsters—literal and metaphorical—are fully back

In short:

Horror in 2025 is bold, ambitious, unpredictable, political, and willing to break form.

FAQ: Best Horror Movies of 2025What is the best horror movie of 2025?

The bracket determines a single winner — listen to discover which film claims the title.

Are these 2025 horror movies theatrical only?

No. The bracket includes streaming originals, festival discoveries, and major studio releases.

Why bracket instead of ranking?

Brackets force tough choices and eliminate safety picks.

There can only be one winner.

Is original horror better than franchise horror this year?

The episode suggests the answer might be yes, but the bracket results tell the story.

One Film Stands Above the RestAfter sixteen contenders face the executioner’s blade, one title emerges as the official Movie of the Year pick for the Best Horror Film of 2025.

No ties.

No cop-outs.

No shared podium.

If you want to know whether the champion is a blockbuster, an ignored masterpiece, an indie miracle, or a risky experiment that paid off, you’ll need to listen.

Listen, Subscribe & Share Your Bracket🎧 Listen now for the full debate and surprise cuts

📩 Email us your bracket or disagreement: popfilterco@gmail.com

🌕 Subscribe for the rest of the 2025 season

🩸 And tell us what we snubbed — we know you will

View Details

The 2025 Season Begins with the Oscar DraftMovie of the Year is back with a brand-new season, and there’s no better way to kick things off than with our first-ever Oscar Draft 2025. Hosted by Cassie, this episode sees panelists Ryan, Mike, Greg, and Taylor engage in a deadly serious competition to predict which films will dominate awards season.

Each drafter is tasked with assembling a roster of films they believe will rack up the most Academy Award nominations—across any and all categories—once Oscar morning finally arrives. It’s prediction, strategy, taste, and fortune-telling rolled into one.

The Taste Buds are back, and this time they’re playing for keeps.

Draft Rules: How the Oscar Draft 2025 WorksTo ensure fairness—and maximize tension—the draft follows a snake format, meaning the order reverses each round.

Key Rules:

1. Drafters select movies, not individuals or categories
2. Any film is eligible—first half, festival darling, delayed release mystery, whatever
3. No two panelists can draft the same film
4. Five rounds total
5. The winning team is the one whose final slate earns the most nominations when the Academy announces them

Every pick is a bet—on the movies themselves, their campaigns, their distributors, their word of mouth, and even the voters’ unpredictable tastes.

Prediction vs Taste: Two Ways to PlayOne wrinkle that defines the episode: panelists must decide what kind of drafter they want to be.

Do you swing for awards-season favorites blessed with early buzz?

Or gamble on late-breaking discoveries nobody else notices yet?

Some draft with spreadsheets and precedent. Others reach for films they want to see recognized. Every strategy has holes—and every smart pick someone else was eyeing can change the entire board.

Stakes, Tension, and Oscar BloodsportUnlike the usual Movie of the Year chaos, this one is deadly serious.

No bit is too small, no argument too granular, and no accusation too petty.

Ryan, Mike, Greg, and Taylor:

1. block each other’s picks
2. steal films out of sheer spite
3. argue over festival credibility
4. negotiate control of the board
5. and, occasionally, wonder if they’ve made a catastrophic mistake

With no immediate winner declared, the true victor won’t be revealed until Oscar nominations are announced.

Which makes the waiting—and the trash talk—that much sweeter.

Bonus Conversation: The State of the 2025 RaceBetween picks, Cassie guides the panel through the critical questions that define this year’s awards landscape, including:

1. Are we preparing for a heavyweight Best Picture category?
2. Does streaming still have power?
3. Are studio campaign budgets shrinking—or going nuclear?
4. How do the festivals signal real contenders vs early hype?
5. And is there a surprise indie waiting to shake up the field?

Consider this episode both a draft and an early contender roundtable.

Why You Should ListenIf you’re:

1. a serious Oscar nerd
2. a casual awards-season watcher
3. a data-brained analyst
4. or someone who wants to scout movies before everyone else gets loud

this episode is your roadmap to the 2025 season.

Listen, Subscribe, and Play Along🎧 Listen now to the Oscar Draft 2025—and start keeping receipts.

💌 Email us your draft board or predictions: popfilterco@gmail.com

⭐ Subscribe to Movie of the Year for the full 2025 season

🏆 And return in a few weeks, when we crown the Oscar Draft champion

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971The DevilsWhy The Devils (1971) Still ProvokesIn this episode of Movie of the Year, Ryan and Mike confront The Devils, Ken Russell’s incendiary historical drama that remains one of the most controversial films ever made. More than fifty years after its release, the film continues to shock and challenge audiences—not simply for its imagery, but for its ruthless examination of power and religion as intertwined systems of control.

Set in 17th-century France but unmistakably modern in its fury, this 1971 production exposes how institutions weaponize belief, morality, and fear. The conversation centers on why its reputation for scandal has so often eclipsed its intelligence, craft, and relevance.

Guest Spotlight: Brian Eggert of DeepFocusReview.comJoining Ryan and Mike is special guest Brian Eggert, editor and lead writer at DeepFocusReview.com. Brian brings a historically grounded, analytical perspective that helps reframe the movie beyond its notoriety.

Brian discusses Ken Russell’s place in 1970s cinema, the long history of censorship surrounding the film, and why its critique of power and religion feels increasingly urgent today. His insight clarifies why this work endures not as shock cinema, but as a rigorously argued piece of political art.

Power and Religion as Systems of ControlAt its core, this film is about power and religion—and how faith becomes an instrument of domination when fused with political authority. What begins as a case of alleged demonic possession in Loudon evolves into a portrait of institutional violence, where truth is irrelevant and spectacle is essential.

Ryan and Mike, with Brian’s input, analyze how religious authority operates alongside the state. Confessions are coerced, belief is staged, and punishment is public. Spiritual language masks political intent, turning faith into theater and theater into violence.

Russell and Jarman: Cinema Built to ConfrontOne of the most radical elements of the movie is the collaboration between Ken Russell and Derek Jarman. The pairing of Russell and Jarman produces a visual world that rejects period realism in favor of aggressive symbolism.

The episode breaks down how this partnership:

1. replaces historical authenticity with stark modernist design
2. uses white, brutalist architecture to deny comfort
3. transforms religious iconography into provocation
4. employs excess as both aesthetic strategy and political critique

This is not cinema designed to immerse—it is cinema designed to unsettle.

The Citizens of Loudon and Collective ResponsibilityBeyond its powerful figures, the story is deeply concerned with the citizens of Loudon. Crowds gather, whisper, watch, and ultimately participate in the machinery of destruction.

Ryan and Mike explore how the film portrays moral panic as a communal process. Fear spreads socially. Violence becomes normalized. The narrative suggests that institutional cruelty only succeeds because ordinary people allow it to happen. The townspeople are not just victims of authority—they are active participants in its enforcement.

Sex, Blasphemy, and the Machinery of ScandalMuch of the controversy surrounding this work stems from its explicit sexuality and sacrilegious imagery. The episode emphasizes that these choices are not gratuitous, but structural.

By placing repression alongside excess, the film exposes hypocrisy at the heart of moral absolutism. The more rigid the institution, the more grotesque its rituals become. Provocation is not the point—it is the method.

Why Listen to This Episode?Listeners will hear:

1. a clear breakdown of The Devils (1971) and its historical context
2. an analysis of power and religion as intertwined systems
3. insight into Russell and Jarman’s radical artistic partnership
4. a discussion of the citizens of Loudon and collective guilt
5. expert commentary from Brian Eggert of DeepFocusReview.com

FAQWhy was the film so controversial?

Its explicit imagery and direct critique of religious and political authority led to widespread censorship and bans.

Who made it?

It was directed by Ken Russell with production design by Derek Jarman.

What is it ultimately saying about religion?

That religion becomes dangerous when it is used to justify unchecked power.

Why The Devils Still MattersMore than half a century later, The Devils remains one of cinema’s most confrontational achievements. Through its unsparing depiction of power and religion, the uncompromising collaboration of Russell and Jarman, and its portrayal of the citizens of Loudon as both victims and enablers, the film continues to challenge audiences to question authority, belief, and spectacle.

🎧 Listen now to hear Ryan and Mike—joined by Brian Eggert—take on The Devils and its enduring relevance.

📬 Share your thoughts on this episode or the 1971 season at popfilterco@gmail.com, and subscribe to Movie of the Year for more fearless film analysis.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971The Panic in Needle ParkWhy Panic in Needle Park Still ResonatesIn this episode of Movie of the Year, Ryan, Greg, and Mike revisit Panic in Needle Park (1971), an unflinching and immersive portrait of addiction, intimacy, and desperation etched into the grit of New York in the 70s. The film’s stark realism and emotional rawness turn what might have been exploitation into something astonishingly human — and absolutely unforgettable.

The Taste Buds explore how Schatzburg’s shots and the fraught dynamics of Bobby and Helen place Panic in Needle Park among the most honest depictions of addiction and dependency in American cinema.

SCHATZBURG’S SHOTS: Cinematic Realism Without ArtificeDirector Jerry Schatzberg crafts Panic in Needle Park with a visual language that refuses escape. Rather than offering stylized glamour, Schatzburg’s shots are observational and immersive — handheld, close, and relentlessly present. These techniques force viewers into the characters’ world, where discomfort isn’t cinematic but immediate and visceral.

The Taste Buds discuss how Schatzberg uses tight framing, real location shooting, and a documentary-like approach to blur the line between performance and lived experience — making addiction feel as suffocating onscreen as it must in reality.

Bobby and Helen and Al: Love, Dependency, and CollapseAt the emotional core of the film lies the complex, destructive relationship of Bobby and Helen. Bobby and Helen’s relationship is not romanticized — it’s transactional, codependent, and shaped by survival on the margins. Al looms as both enabler and inevitability, a reminder that escape is always temporary.

Ryan, Greg, and Mike explore how the film treats love and addiction as mirrors: Bobby and Helen cling not to hope, but to each other because they have nowhere else to turn. The cycle of dependency becomes the story’s most heartbreaking theme.

New York in the 70s: A City That Sees It AllFew films capture New York in the 70s with the same unvarnished clarity as Panic in Needle Park. The city is at once backdrop and silent character — indifferent, worn, and sprawling. Parks, streets, and subways become interchangeable landscapes of desperation and anonymity.

The Taste Buds discuss how Panic in Needle Park uses real locations to root its story in a specific urban moment — a New York fraught with economic hardship, social upheaval, and the grinding anonymity that shapes these lives.

Guest Spotlight: Mark Searby — Scholar, Podcaster, and Al Pacino ExpertThis episode features special guest Mark Searby, a seasoned film critic, broadcaster, and author with deep expertise in character-driven cinema. Mark is best known as the host of All About Al: The Pacino Podcast, a series dedicated to exploring the film, television, and stage career of Al Pacino. The show offers in-depth discussions with critics, scholars, and collaborators about Pacino’s work and influence. Acast

Mark is also the author of Al Pacino: The Movies Behind The Man, a comprehensive guide to Pacino’s filmography that examines the actor’s artistic evolution — from his breakout performance in Panic in Needle Park through classics like The Godfather and Dog Day Afternoon. Apple Podcasts. His perspective adds historical context to the film and enriches the Taste Buds’ conversation about its storytelling, performance, and legacy.

Performances That Alter ExpectationsThe cast of Panic in Needle Park delivers performances that feel less like acting and more like a lived experience. The Taste Buds unpack how these portrayals discard artifice in favor of raw vulnerability, making the film’s emotional terrain as palpable as its gritty setting.

Why Panic in Needle Park Still MattersMore than fifty years later, the film endures because it refuses catharsis. Through SCHATZBURG’S SHOTS, the fraught connections between Bobby and Helen and Al, and its evocation of New York in the 70s, the film forces viewers to sit with pain rather than escape it.

Listen now to hear Ryan, Greg, and Mike — joined by Mark Searby — discuss Panic in Needle Park and its lasting power.

Share your thoughts or your favorite 1971 films at popfilterco@gmail.com, and subscribe for more deep dives from the 1971 season of Movie of the Year.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971DuelWhy Duel Still Defines Steven SpielbergIn this episode of Movie of the Year, Ryan, Greg, and Mike hit the highway with Duel, the 1971 television movie that announced the arrival of Steven Spielberg as a filmmaker to watch. Long before Jaws turned Spielberg into a household name, Duel showcased his instinctive command of suspense, visual storytelling, and cinematic geography.

Though made for television, Duel feels relentlessly cinematic. The Taste Buds explore how Steven Spielberg transformed a simple premise—a man pursued by a truck—into a nerve-shredding examination of fear, pride, and survival, and why Duel remains one of the most influential thrillers of the 1970s.

Steven Spielberg’s Duel: The Blueprint for a Legendary CareerViewed today, Duel plays like a rough draft of Steven Spielberg’s entire career. Even at this early stage, Spielberg demonstrates the techniques that would come to define his work:

1. crystal-clear visual storytelling
2. tension built through movement rather than dialogue
3. empathy for ordinary protagonists
4. action staged with escalating precision

Ryan, Greg, and Mike break down how Duel anticipates Spielberg’s later films, from Jaws to War of the Worlds, in which everyday people confront overwhelming, often mechanical forces. Duel is not just Spielberg’s breakthrough—it’s his mission statement.

Duel, Masculinity, and the Fragile American MaleAt the center of the film is Dennis Weaver’s David Mann, a character whose name underscores the film’s obsession with masculinity. Spielberg presents masculinity not as strength, but as something brittle—constantly tested by humiliation, fear, and wounded pride.

The Taste Buds analyze how Steven Spielberg uses the relentless chase to strip Mann of social niceties and self-image. Each confrontation with the truck becomes a confrontation with his own identity, forcing Mann to decide whether masculinity means dominance, endurance, or simply surviving long enough to escape.

This uneasy portrait of masculinity would echo throughout Spielberg’s career, particularly in his depictions of anxious men pushed to emotional and physical extremes.

America as a Hostile Landscape in DuelFew films capture the anxiety lurking beneath the promise of America’s open spaces as effectively as Duel. Spielberg transforms highways, diners, and gas stations into zones of menace, where authority is absent and help never arrives.

Ryan, Greg, and Mike discuss how Steven Spielberg’s vision of America in Duel reflects a growing cultural unease: freedom becomes isolation, mobility becomes vulnerability, and technology becomes an anonymous threat. The truck itself is never humanized—it’s industrial, faceless, and unstoppable, embodying a uniquely American nightmare.

Guest Spotlight: Eric Vespe (Formerly Quint) from The SpielThis episode features special guest Eric Vespe, a veteran film journalist and podcaster with decades of experience covering cinema and genre filmmaking. Eric is formally known to many longtime film fans as Quint, the byline he used during his influential years writing about movies and pop culture online.

Eric currently co-hosts The Spiel, a podcast devoted to thoughtful, in-depth conversations about movies, filmmakers, and film culture. His deep knowledge of film history and particular passion for directors like Steven Spielberg make him an ideal voice for an episode centered on Duel.

On Movie of the Year, Eric brings sharp insight into Spielberg’s early career, the importance of Duel as a made-for-TV movie that transcended its format, and how the film foreshadows the stylistic and thematic choices Spielberg would refine across his career.

Duel’s Influence and Spielberg’s Road ForwardThe Taste Buds trace how the film influenced:

1. The evolution of the television movie
2. minimalist suspense filmmaking
3. Spielberg’s recurring fascination with machines as antagonists
4. later road-terror and survival thrillers

Despite its modest origins, Duel stands as a foundational work—not just in Spielberg’s filmography, but in American suspense cinema.

Why Duel Still MattersMore than fifty years later, the movie remains a masterclass in tension, economy, and psychological storytelling. Through Steven Spielberg’s precise direction, its unsettling exploration of masculinity, and its bleak portrait of America as an indifferent landscape, Duel proves that terror doesn’t require spectacle—only momentum and control.

🎧 Listen now to hear Ryan, Greg, and Mike—joined by Eric Vespe—break down Duel and the birth of Steven Spielberg’s cinematic voice.

📬 Share your thoughts on Spielberg’s early work at popfilterco@gmail.com, and subscribe for more deep dives from the 1971 season of Movie of the Year.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971Action Figure Draft, Part 2The Chaos Continues in the Action Figure Draft 1971In this week’s Movie of the Year, Ryan, Greg, Mike, and Taylor conclude the most brutal, strategic, and downright unhinged draft of the season: the Action Figure Draft 1971.

Every Taste Bud continues to choose characters from 1971 movies (or TV productions), imagining them as highly posable, battle-ready action figures. These figures must then be assigned to six RPG-inspired roles: bard, cleric, druid, fighter, wizard, and wild card.

The goal?

Build a team capable of winning an all-out fight against the other rosters.

And the twist that changes everything:

Once a character is drafted from a movie, no one else can draft anyone else from that same movie.

No backups. No consolation picks. Once it’s gone, it’s GONE.

If you thought last season’s drafts were chaotic…you ain't heard 1971.

The Draft Rules: One Year, One Movie Per Pick, Zero MercyTo keep this battle as ruthless as possible, the Taste Buds lock in the following rules:

Snake Draft FormatThe order reverses each round, forcing careful planning and last-second gambits.

Draft RolesEach team must fill:

• Bard – charm, chaos, charisma
• Cleric – healer, protector, mystical weirdo
• Druid – nature, magic, unpredictable energy
• Fighter – the bruiser, tank, or martial artist
• Wizard – supernatural, cerebral, or ranged powerhouse
• Wild Card – whatever you dare unleash

Eligibility: 1971 Movies (and TV Productions) [and Musicians probably] OnlyIf it hit screens in 1971 (big screen, small screen, arthouse, grindhouse), it’s fair game.

The Killer Rule: One Character Per MovieAs soon as a player drafts any character from a movie or TV title, that entire production is locked out forever.

Pick a character from Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory? The rest of Wonka’s weirdos vanish.

Choose someone from A Clockwork Orange? Say goodbye to Alex’s droogs.

Reach into The French Connection? No detective backup for anyone.

This rule transforms the draft into a battlefield where stealing a movie is every bit as important as drafting the right character.

The ObjectiveCreate a team of 1971 action figures capable of absolutely wrecking the others in a hypothetical battle royale.

Selecting the Bard, Cleric, Druid, Fighter, Wizard, and Wild CardThe Taste Buds dive deep into the weird, violent, soulful, experimental year that is 1971 cinema. With each category requiring a different kind of fighter, strategy becomes key:

• A bard might be a charming con artist, a manipulative cult leader, or someone who just screams enough to cause psychic damage.
• A cleric might heal, preach, or haunt.
• A druid might commune with nature or be a chaos gremlin.
• A fighter is your tank — your blunt instrument of violence.
• A wizard could be supernatural…or simply smarter and more dangerous than anyone else.
• And the wild card?
• Well, 1971 produced some bizarre characters. Anything can happen here.

And because each movie gets only one character drafted, every pick is a race to snatch a film before someone else steals it out from under you.

Strategy, Betrayal, and Full-Contact Action Figure ViolenceThis is one of the most competitive and ruthless episodes in Movie of the Year history. Expect:

• devastating movie steals
• furious accusations
• unexpected gambits
• arguments over which 1971 character has “wizard energy.”
• deeply questionable bard picks
• and several moments where someone makes a choice so chaotic that the others question their sanity

The one-movie rule forces every Taste Bud to think like a general — and fight like a child who desperately wants the coolest toy on the shelf.

Why Action Figure Draft 1971 Is a Perfect Snapshot of 1971 Cinema1971 is a year filled with:

• unhinged villains
• counterculture antiheroes
• gritty detectives
• revolutionaries
• tragic romantics
• and deeply weird oddballs

Translating them into action figures reveals just how diverse and wild the cinema of 1971 really was.

This episode becomes part toy commercial, part Hunger Games, part film history, and part psychological warfare — all while celebrating the characters and movies that defined an era.

FAQ: Action Figure Draft 1971What is the Action Figure Draft 1971?

A competitive snake draft where hosts build action-figure teams from 1971 movies using RPG roles.

What roles must each team draft?

Bard, cleric, druid, fighter, wizard, and wild card.

Who participates?

Ryan, Greg, Mike, and Taylor.

What’s the unique twist?

Once a character from a film or TV show is drafted, no other character from that same title can be selected.

How is the winner determined?

The team most capable of winning an all-out fight.

Why Action Figure Draft 1971 Is an All-TimerWhen the dust settles, the Action Figure Draft 1971 becomes a celebration of strategy, movie lore, and the absolute chaos of trying to weaponize 1971’s characters. With the one-movie rule adding maximum tension, every pick becomes a fight, every steal becomes a betrayal, and every team becomes a glorious mess of plastic power.

Listen now to hear Ryan, Greg, Mike, and Taylor conclude the Action Figure Draft 1971.

Send your own dream rosters—or vote for who dominates—to popfilterco@gmail.com.

Subscribe for more 1971 chaos throughout the season.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971Action Figure Draft, Part 1The Chaos Begins in the Action Figure Draft 1971In this week’s Movie of the Year, Ryan, Greg, Mike, and Taylor enter the arena for the most brutal, strategic, and downright unhinged draft of the season: the Action Figure Draft 1971.

Every Taste Bud must choose characters from 1971 movies (or TV productions), imagining them as highly posable, battle-ready action figures. These figures must then be assigned to six RPG-inspired roles: bard, cleric, druid, fighter, wizard, and wild card.

The goal?

Build a team capable of winning an all-out fight against the other rosters.

And the twist that changes everything:

Once a character is drafted from a movie, no one else can draft anyone else from that same movie.

No backups. No consolation picks. Once it's gone, it’s GONE.

If you thought last season’s drafts were chaotic…welcome to 1971.

The Draft Rules: One Year, One Movie Per Pick, Zero MercyTo keep this battle as ruthless as possible, the Taste Buds lock in the following rules:

Snake Draft FormatThe order reverses each round, forcing careful planning and last-second gambits.

Draft RolesEach team must fill:

• Bard – charm, chaos, charisma
• Cleric – healer, protector, mystical weirdo
• Druid – nature, magic, unpredictable energy
• Fighter – the bruiser, tank, or martial artist
• Wizard – supernatural, cerebral, or ranged powerhouse
• Wild Card – whatever you dare unleash

Eligibility: 1971 Movies (and TV Productions) OnlyIf it hit screens in 1971 (big screen, small screen, arthouse, grindhouse), it’s fair game.

The Killer Rule: One Character Per MovieAs soon as a player drafts any character from a movie or TV title, that entire production is locked out forever.

Pick a character from Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory? The rest of Wonka’s weirdos vanish.

Choose someone from A Clockwork Orange? Say goodbye to Alex’s droogs.

Reach into The French Connection? No detective backup for anyone.

This rule transforms the draft into a battlefield where stealing a movie is every bit as important as drafting the right character.

The ObjectiveCreate a team of 1971 action figures capable of absolutely wrecking the others in a hypothetical battle royale.

Selecting the Bard, Cleric, Druid, Fighter, Wizard, and Wild CardThe Taste Buds dive deep into the weird, violent, soulful, experimental year that is 1971 cinema. With each category requiring a different kind of fighter, strategy becomes key:

• A bard might be a charming con artist, a manipulative cult leader, or someone who just screams enough to cause psychic damage.
• A cleric might heal, preach, or haunt.
• A druid might commune with nature or be a chaos gremlin.
• A fighter is your tank — your blunt instrument of violence.
• A wizard could be supernatural…or simply smarter and more dangerous than anyone else.
• And the wild card?
• Well, 1971 produced some bizarre characters. Anything can happen here.

And because each movie gets only one character drafted, every pick is a race to snatch a film before someone else steals it out from under you.

Strategy, Betrayal, and Full-Contact Action Figure ViolenceThis is one of the most competitive and ruthless episodes in Movie of the Year history. Expect:

• devastating movie steals
• furious accusations
• unexpected gambits
• arguments over which 1971 character has “wizard energy.”
• deeply questionable bard picks
• and several moments where someone makes a choice so chaotic that the others question their sanity

The one-movie rule forces every Taste Bud to think like a general — and fight like a child who desperately wants the coolest toy on the shelf.

Why Action Figure Draft 1971 Is a Perfect Snapshot of 1971 Cinema1971 is a year filled with:

• unhinged villains
• counterculture antiheroes
• gritty detectives
• revolutionaries
• tragic romantics
• and deeply weird oddballs

Translating them into action figures reveals just how diverse and wild the cinema of 1971 really was.

This episode becomes part toy commercial, part Hunger Games, part film history, and part psychological warfare — all while celebrating the characters and movies that defined an era.

FAQ: Action Figure Draft 1971What is the Action Figure Draft 1971?

A competitive snake draft where hosts build action-figure teams from 1971 movies using RPG roles.

What roles must each team draft?

Bard, cleric, druid, fighter, wizard, and wild card.

Who participates?

Ryan, Greg, Mike, and Taylor.

What’s the unique twist?

Once a character from a film or TV show is drafted, no other character from that same title can be selected.

How is the winner determined?

The team most capable of winning an all-out fight.

Why Action Figure Draft 1971 Is an All-TimerWhen the dust settles, the Action Figure Draft 1971 becomes a celebration of strategy, movie lore, and the absolute chaos of trying to weaponize 1971’s characters. With the one-movie rule adding maximum tension, every pick becomes a fight, every steal becomes a betrayal, and every team becomes a glorious mess of plastic power.

🎧 Listen now to hear Ryan, Greg, Mike, and Taylor battle through the Action Figure Draft 1971.

📬 Send your own dream rosters—or vote for who dominates—to popfilterco@gmail.com.

🔔 Subscribe for more 1971 chaos throughout the season.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971McCabe and Mrs. MillerMcCabe and Mrs Miller and the Birth of the Revisionist WesternIn this episode of Movie of the Year, Ryan, Greg, and Mike dive into McCabe and Mrs Miller, one of the most enduring and atmospheric films of the 1970s. Hailed as a defining entry in The Revisionist Western, Robert Altman’s subversive frontier tale reshaped the genre with its melancholy tone, snowy landscapes, and the unforgettable chemistry of Beatty and Christie.

More than 50 years later, McCabe and Mrs Miller still captivates audiences with its blending of realism, capitalism, romance, and tragedy. The Taste Buds explore how the film dismantles the myth of the cowboy and replaces it with something far more human — and far more haunting.

McCabe and Mrs Miller and the Evolution of The Revisionist WesternAs one of the foundational films of The Revisionist Western, McCabe and Mrs Miller stands in opposition to classic Hollywood frontier mythology. Instead of rugged heroes conquering the wilderness, Altman gives us a world where power is fragile, capitalism is violent, and survival depends less on grit and more on negotiation, luck, and vulnerability.

The Taste Buds analyze how the film:

• challenges Western tropes through vulnerability instead of bravado
• replaces heroic gunfights with corporate brutality
• foregrounds community, compromise, and human frailty
• uses McCabe’s tragic arc to critique capitalist expansion

This isn’t the West as legend — it’s the West as lived experience.

Robert Altman and Gordon Willis: Sound, Snow, and Cinematic SubversionMcCabe and Mrs Miller bears the unmistakable imprint of Robert Altman, whose improvisational direction and overlapping soundscape helped reinvent American cinema in the 1970s. Working with cinematographer Gordon Willis, known for his moody, shadow-rich images, Altman transforms the Western into a dreamlike, fog-drenched meditation.

The Taste Buds highlight how Altman and Willis shape the film’s signature aesthetic:

• Overlapping dialogue and naturalistic sound that create a bustling, lived-in community
• Diffused, foggy lighting and filters that give the film its iconic “sepia snowdream” look
• Long, drifting shots that emphasize the vulnerability of characters lost in a harsh landscape
• Leonard Cohen’s mournful soundtrack, underscoring the film’s quiet despair

Altman and Willis built not just a Western — but a world.

Beatty and Christie: The Heart of McCabe and Mrs MillerAt the emotional center of the film are Warren Beatty and Julie Christie, whose complex, understated dynamic elevates McCabe and Mrs Miller into something approaching tragic romance.

The Taste Buds explore:

• Beatty’s portrayal of McCabe as a man confused by his own legend
• Christie’s luminous, grounded performance as Mrs. Miller — the true brains of the operation
• The subversion of the “cowboy and madam” trope
• Their crackling chemistry and the off-screen relationship that deepened their on-screen connection

Together, Beatty and Christie redefine intimacy within the Western genre, offering partnership instead of power fantasy.

Themes of McCabe and Mrs Miller: Capitalism, Community, and ControlRyan, Greg, and Mike unpack the themes that give McCabe and Mrs Miller its enduring resonance:

Capitalism as the Ultimate VillainThe true outlaw isn’t a gunslinger — it’s the corporation that buys your life.

The Fragility of CommunityAs the town grows, power shifts, and bonds strain under pressure.

Female Power in a Male-Dominated WorldMrs. Miller is one of the most compelling women in any Western — a strategist, a leader, and the only one who understands the stakes.

Isolation and IdentityMcCabe builds a myth around himself — and suffocates beneath it.

These themes continue to influence Revisionist Westerns like Deadwood, The Assassination of Jesse James, and Heaven’s Gate.

Guest Spotlight: Chuck Bryan from The Cinematic FlashbackThis episode also features a special guest: Chuck Bryan, host of The Cinematic Flashback podcast. Bringing his deep knowledge of film history and his signature mix of insight and humor, Chuck adds a fresh perspective on McCabe and Mrs Miller, particularly in how the film dialogues with earlier Westerns and how Altman’s approach helped reshape American cinema. His expertise in revisiting pivotal films of the past makes him a natural fit for a conversation about this groundbreaking Revisionist Western.

Listeners of The Cinematic Flashback will appreciate Chuck’s thoughtful observations — and newcomers may find themselves subscribing the moment the episode ends. Find Chuck at https://www.cinematicflashback.com/

Why Listen?Listeners will hear:

• Why McCabe and Mrs Miller redefined the Western
• How Robert Altman and Gordon Willis crafted a new kind of cinematic realism
• What makes Beatty and Christie’s performances iconic
• How the film critiques capitalism through character tragedy
• How guest Chuck Bryan connects the film to the broader history of the Western
• Connections to other 1971 films in the Movie of the Year season

FAQ: McCabe and Mrs Miller(Optimized for Google’s “People Also Ask”)

Is McCabe and Mrs Miller a Revisionist Western?

Yes. It’s widely regarded as one of the most important Revisionist Westerns ever made.

Why is Robert Altman’s direction important?

Altman’s naturalistic sound, improvisational performances, and atmospheric visuals helped transform American cinema.

What makes Beatty and Christie’s performances memorable?

Their emotional complexity and unconventional romance bring humanity and tragedy to the genre.

How does Chuck Bryan contribute to the episode?

Chuck enhances the conversation with rich historical context and expert insight from his podcast The Cinematic Flashback.

Why McCabe and Mrs Miller Remains a MasterpieceMore than half a century after its release, McCabe and Mrs Miller endures as one of the great American films — a devastating, beautiful example of how Robert Altman, Gordon Willis, Beatty and Christie, and now guest panelist Chuck Bryan illuminate The Revisionist Western with tragedy, atmosphere, and emotional depth. With its haunting images, melancholy rhythms, and deeply human characters, the film remains essential viewing for anyone who loves cinema that questions its own mythology.

Listen now to the Taste Buds’ deep dive into McCabe and Mrs Miller with special guest Chuck Bryan.

Send your favorite Revisionist Westerns to popfilterco@gmail.com.

Subscribe for more 1971 classics covered this season.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971KluteWhy Klute Still Captivates AudiencesIn this episode of Movie of the Year, Ryan, Greg, and Mike examine Klute, Alan J. Pakula’s groundbreaking 1971 thriller that fused noir, feminist character study, and political paranoia into a single atmospheric masterpiece. From its haunting portrayal of loneliness to its razor-sharp critique of power and control, Klute remains one of the most influential films of the 1970s — a tense, stylish, and unsettling work anchored by unforgettable performances.

The Taste Buds explore how Klute uses mood, silence, and perspective to reimagine what a thriller can be, and why its themes still resonate decades later.

Pakula and Willis: Crafting the Look and Fear of KluteAlan J. Pakula, working with cinematographer Gordon Willis, created in Klute what would become the visual and tonal blueprint for 1970s paranoia cinema. The Taste Buds discuss how the Pakula/Willis partnership shaped not only this film, but future classics as well.

• Pakula’s direction emphasizes psychological distance, moral ambiguity, and bureaucratic dread.
• Willis — the legendary “Prince of Darkness” — saturates the film with deep shadows, cold light, and voyeuristic framing that makes the audience feel watched.
• The collaboration results in a thriller where silence is suspense, space is threat, and every frame hints at danger you can’t quite see.

This visual strategy becomes the DNA of Pakula’s later films, but Klute is where the paranoia begins.

Bree Daniels: Jane Fonda’s Defining PerformanceNo element of Klute is more celebrated than Jane Fonda’s performance as Bree Daniels, a character whose complexity transformed the possibilities for female roles in crime and thriller cinema.

Ryan, Greg, and Mike explore how Bree’s character:

• serves as the emotional center of Klute
• navigates trauma, agency, sexuality, and survival
• resists the stereotypes typically imposed on sex workers
• expresses her inner life most vividly in her therapy scenes, where the film slows down and lets Bree define herself in her own words

Fonda delivers a portrait of a woman who is both vulnerable and fiercely self-aware — a character fighting for autonomy in a world designed to control her.

John Klute: Donald Sutherland’s Quiet DetectiveWhile Bree is the heart of the film, Donald Sutherland’s John Klute is the unstable axis around which the mystery turns. His restrained, almost withdrawn performance contrasts sharply with Bree’s vivid emotional life.

The Taste Buds discuss how John Klute:

• subverts noir detective tropes by being passive rather than dominant
• reflects the unease and disillusionment of early 1970s masculinity
• becomes both protector and threat, comfort and menace
• heightens the film’s tension simply by what he doesn’t say

His quietness becomes the film’s most unsettling element — the fear that danger might come not from action, but from inaction.

Klute's Themes: Power, Paranoia, and the Performance of IdentityThe Taste Buds analyze the movie as a story deeply invested in the forces that shape who we become and how we behave:

• Power — who has it, who wants it, who is crushed by it
• Paranoia — the constant hum of surveillance that defines the film’s world
• Identity and performance — especially in Bree’s struggle to choose the self she wants, rather than the one society demands

Klute isn’t just a thriller; it’s a portrait of a society that has lost trust in its institutions, its relationships, and even itself.

Why Klute Still MattersMore than 50 years later, Klute remains a film of stunning relevance — a psychological thriller that interrogates gender, power, surveillance, and the fragile places where personal and political fears overlap. With the visionary collaboration of Pakula and Willis, the unforgettable humanity of Bree, and the chilling restraint of John Klute, the film continues to inspire filmmakers and fascinate viewers.

🎧 Listen now to hear Ryan, Greg, and Mike break down the craft, characters, and cultural legacy of Klute.

📬 Email your reactions to popfilterco@gmail.com, and subscribe for more deep dives from the 1971 season of Movie of the Year.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971MixtapeThe Mixtape Reaches Its Final FormIn the second and final installment of the Movie of the Year: Mixtape 1971, Mike, Greg, Ryan, and special guest Taylor reunite to complete the ultimate playlist of songs released in 1971. What began as a nostalgic, free-wheeling journey through one of the greatest years in music now becomes a decisive act of curation. Each Taste Bud must make their final selections, shaping the last pieces of a mixtape that captures the sound, soul, and spirit of 1971.

This isn’t a draft. This isn’t a competition. It’s a collaborative act of musical archaeology—a mission to create a playlist worthy of an era that changed everything.

Finishing the Playlist: Drama, Dissent, and DedicationThe tension rises as the Taste Buds fill the final open slots on the mixtape. The stakes aren’t about winning—they’re about getting it right. Which tracks deserve early placement? Which songs have earned the privilege of closing out the mix? And which hidden gems from 1971 demand to be heard?

With every selection, the Mixtape becomes more defined and more surprising, balancing iconic hits with deep cuts, genre-spanning favorites, and songs that shaped both cinema and culture.

This episode leans into the drama: passionate defenses, sudden reversals, and the kind of decisive playlist-building energy that only the Taste Buds can bring.

The Themes That Emerged from 1971As the Mixtape locks into place, the Taste Buds uncover the unexpected themes that emerged from their selections.

• Rebellion and protest—echoes of a generation reckoning with war, justice, and identity.
• Introspection and vulnerability—songwriters unearthing new emotional territory.
• Genre expansion—rock, soul, folk, funk, and country all exploding in new directions.

Together, these tracks tell a story of a year that didn’t just produce great music—it reshaped the cultural landscape.

Guest Spotlight: Taylor Returns for the FinaleSpecial guest Taylor returns for Part Two, bringing strong musical instincts and a fearless approach to finishing the playlist. Her choices add emotional depth, tonal variety, and bold color to the final tracklist—helping shape Mixtape 1971 into something that feels alive, resonant, and unmistakably right.

Conclusion: The Definitive 1971 MixtapeWith the final songs selected and the playlist complete, Mixtape 1971 stands as a testament to the sound of the era—rebellious, soulful, experimental, and unforgettable. Whether you lived through it or discovered it decades later, these tracks offer a time capsule of a world changing in real time.

🎧 Listen now to the dramatic conclusion of Mixtape 1971 and experience the playlist as it comes together moment by moment.

📬 Email your own 1971 song selections—or your personal Mixtape 1971—to popfilterco@gmail.com.

🔔 And don’t forget to subscribe to Movie of the Year for more 1971 episodes, deep dives, and debates.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971MixtapeThe Sound of 1971The Taste Buds are trading film reels for vinyl grooves in this week’s episode of Movie of the Year, as Mike, Greg, Ryan, and special guest Taylor create the ultimate 1971 Mixtape. It’s the year of protest songs, psychedelic experimentation, soul anthems, and singer-songwriter confessionals—and the Taste Buds are here to decide which tracks define it all.

Each host takes turns drafting their favorite songs from 1971 and placing them into the perfect playlist order. What emerges is not just a collection of hits, but a sonic time capsule—capturing the emotion, rebellion, and rhythm of a year when music and culture collided in unforgettable ways.

The Rules of the MixtapeHere’s how it works:

• Only songs released in 1971 are eligible.
• Each participant takes a turn selecting a song.
• The chooser not only selects the song but also decides where it goes in the lineup, although the choosers of the opener and closer are pre-determined.

The result? A carefully chaotic playlist that reflects the Taste Buds’ unique blend of passion, humor, and deep-cut expertise.

The Music of 1971: A Revolution on Record1971 wasn’t just another year in music—it was a creative explosion. From the poetic introspection of the singer-songwriter era to the gritty pulse of funk and soul, 1971 became a soundtrack to a generation in transition.

As the Taste Buds debate their picks, they uncover how the sounds of this year—across rock, R&B, country, and beyond—captured the cultural aftershocks of the 1960s and set the stage for the music that defined the decade to come.

Whether it’s an anthem of rebellion or a quiet moment of heartbreak, every song chosen for the 1971 Mixtape tells part of the story of who we were, and who we were becoming.

Guest Spotlight: Taylor Joins the MixtapeThis episode features special guest Taylor, who brings his own distinctive taste and flair to the playlist. A longtime friend of the show and a sharp musical mind, Taylor adds energy, insight, and a few unexpected curveballs to the draft. His picks remind the crew—and listeners—why music isn’t just heard, it’s felt.

Conclusion: Press Play on the PastBy the end of the episode, the Taste Buds have built something more than a playlist—they’ve created a living archive of sound, heart, and memory. The 1971 Mixtape is a reminder of why this era of music still resonates, decades later: it was honest, fearless, and timeless.

🎧 Listen now to hear Mike, Greg, Ryan, and Taylor craft the ultimate 1971 Mixtape. Subscribe to Movie of the Year, and email your own playlist picks to popfilterco@gmail.com—because your favorite 1971 song deserves a spot on the record.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971The ConformistRevisiting The Conformist (1971) – Power and Identity in Italian CinemaIn this episode of Movie of the Year, Ryan, Greg, and Nate take on Bernardo Bertolucci’s The Conformist (1971), a visual and psychological masterpiece that defined the aesthetics of 1970s cinema. Through its haunting beauty and moral ambiguity, The Conformist examines how a man’s need to belong leads him down a path of destruction.

As the Taste Buds explore, Bertolucci’s film is more than a political allegory—it’s an intimate portrait of repression, desire, and the fragile nature of identity.

Bertolucci’s The Conformist and the Politics of StyleFew filmmakers balance ideology and artistry as masterfully as Bernardo Bertolucci. The Taste Buds discuss how his direction turns politics into visual poetry, using color, shadow, and architecture to mirror the internal lives of his characters.

Cinematographer Vittorio Storaro creates a world of geometric perfection and emotional chaos, where fascist Italy becomes both stage and metaphor. Every shot in The Conformist (1971) is deliberate—an expression of control, guilt, and the terror of individual thought in a conformist world.

(Learn more about Bertolucci’s visual approach on Criterion’s Bertolucci essay.)

Marcello Clerici: The Psychology of FascismAt the center of The Conformist is Marcello Clerici, portrayed by Jean-Louis Trintignant with quiet dread. Marcello longs to fit in, to appear normal, to bury the parts of himself that don’t conform. His fear of difference drives him toward fascism—not out of conviction, but out of insecurity.

Ryan, Greg, and Nate explore how Marcello’s repression and guilt become political acts. His story reveals how ordinary people become instruments of ideology—not through belief, but through cowardice and the seductive comfort of belonging.

Anna and Giulia: Women, Desire, and RebellionThe women of The Conformist (1971)—Anna (Dominique Sanda) and Giulia (Stefania Sandrelli)—represent opposing forces in Marcello’s life and Italy’s cultural psyche. Anna is sharp, enigmatic, and politically aware—a woman whose defiance threatens to unravel Marcello’s carefully constructed identity. Giulia is complacent, beautiful, and submissive, embodying the illusion of safety and control.

The Taste Buds analyze how Bertolucci frames both women as agents of desire and symbols of rebellion, showing that even within oppressive systems, resistance can take many forms—some loud, others quietly devastating.

Guest Spotlight: Nate Ragolia from Debut BuddiesThis episode features special guest Nate Ragolia, co-host of the hit podcast Debut Buddies. Known for celebrating pop-culture firsts—from debut albums to first films—Nate brings his trademark blend of insight and humor to The Conformist (1971). His deep appreciation for cinema’s evolution adds a new dimension to the discussion, connecting Bertolucci’s exploration of identity and conformity to the creative risks artists still face today.

🎧 Check out Debut Buddies wherever you get podcasts to hear Nate’s take on the beginnings of cultural phenomena.

FAQ: The Conformist (1971) ExplainedWho directed The Conformist (1971)?

Italian filmmaker Bernardo Bertolucci directed The Conformist, adapting it from Alberto Moravia’s novel of the same name.

What is The Conformist about?

It follows Marcello Clerici, a man who joins Mussolini’s secret police to suppress his individuality and appear “normal.” The film exposes how repression breeds complicity.

Why is The Conformist (1971) significant?

Its groundbreaking cinematography, psychological complexity, and political insight make it one of the most influential European films of the 20th century.

Who plays Anna and Giulia in The Conformist?

Dominique Sanda portrays Anna, while Stefania Sandrelli plays Giulia—two women representing freedom and conformity, respectively.

Conclusion: Why The Conformist Still MattersOver half a century later, The Conformist (1971) stands as a defining work of European art cinema. With Bertolucci’s meticulous vision, Marcello’s haunting moral conflict, and the unforgettable performances of Anna and Giulia, the film remains a powerful warning against complacency and moral blindness.

🎧 Listen now to hear Ryan, Greg, and Nate from Debut Buddies dissect The Conformist (1971)—its beauty, its brutality, and its lingering relevance. Subscribe to Movie of the Year, leave a review, and email your thoughts to popfilterco@gmail.com. Because even in a world of conformity, great movies dare to stand apart.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971WandaRediscovering Wanda (1971) – A Landmark of Feminist CinemaIn this episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—begin their deep dive into 1971 cinema with Barbara Loden’s raw, groundbreaking film, Wanda. Once dismissed and now celebrated as a cornerstone of feminist filmmaking, Wanda (1971) captures the alienation and quiet rebellion of a woman trying to survive in a world that refuses to see her.

For movie lovers and film historians alike, this episode explores how Wanda transformed independent film, redefined the female gaze, and challenged the capitalist structures of both life and art.

The Character of Wanda: Feminism and Alienation in 1971 CinemaAt the heart of Wanda (1971) lies a protagonist unlike any other. Wanda Goronski, portrayed by Barbara Loden herself, is a woman out of step with the world around her—drifting through Pennsylvania coal country with little purpose, no plan, and even less hope.

The Taste Buds explore how Wanda’s detachment becomes a quiet act of resistance. She isn’t empowered in the conventional sense, but her refusal to conform to the expectations of wifehood, motherhood, and labor gives her a radical presence. Her story asks: is true freedom even possible for someone like Wanda in a capitalist, patriarchal society?

Barbara Loden’s Direction and Legacy in WandaBarbara Loden—actor, writer, and director—crafted Wanda as an intensely personal response to the limitations placed on women in both Hollywood and everyday life. The Taste Buds examine how her minimalist style and vérité realism broke from the conventions of the era, situating Wanda as one of the earliest examples of American independent cinema’s feminist movement.

Shot on a shoestring budget with nonprofessional actors, Wanda captures authenticity without sentimentality. Loden’s direction feels lived-in, intimate, and unsparing—her camera refuses to judge Wanda even as society does. The Taste Buds discuss how Loden’s work paved the way for later filmmakers exploring identity, alienation, and the female experience.

Feminism vs. Capitalism: The Political Core of WandaWanda (1971) isn’t just a character study—it’s a political statement. The Taste Buds unpack how the film critiques the intersections of feminism and capitalism, showing how both liberation and exploitation exist within the same system.

For Wanda, the American Dream is a nightmare: men exploit her, work dehumanizes her, and freedom always comes with a price. The Taste Buds discuss how Wanda’s raw honesty about poverty, gender, and survival resonates today, reflecting an America where independence remains conditional and fleeting.

FAQ: Wanda (1971) on Movie of the YearWho directed Wanda (1971)?

Barbara Loden wrote, directed, and starred in Wanda, making it a pioneering example of feminist independent cinema.

Why is Wanda considered a feminist film?

It rejects Hollywood’s idealized portrayals of women, instead depicting a complex, flawed woman navigating systemic oppression and limited choices.

Where can I watch Wanda (1971)?

Wanda is available through the Criterion Collection and select streaming platforms dedicated to classic and independent cinema.

Conclusion: Why Wanda Still MattersMore than fifty years later, Wanda (1971) endures as a defining work of feminist and independent filmmaking. With Barbara Loden’s fearless direction and the haunting performance at its core, Wanda continues to challenge how audiences see women, work, and worth in a capitalist society.

🎧 Listen now to the Taste Buds’ in-depth conversation about Wanda (1971)—Barbara Loden’s unsung masterpiece. Subscribe to Movie of the Year, share your thoughts on feminist cinema, and email your reactions to popfilterco@gmail.com—because Wanda might be lost in the system, but she refuses to disappear.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971The 16 Films Are ChosenThe Battle Heats UpIn Part Two of the Movie of the Year: 1971 season, the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—return to slice the bracket from 64 films down to 16. What began as a celebration of early-1970s experimentation has become a cinematic bloodbath. This is where masterpieces clash, cult favorites fall, and only the strongest survive.

1971 continues to reveal its soul: a year defined by disillusionment, moral decay, and the desperate search for meaning in a changing world. The Taste Buds wrestle with these themes as they try to separate the timeless from the forgotten in one of the most volatile brackets in podcast history.

The Cultural Turmoil of 1971The deeper the Taste Buds dive into 1971, the clearer it becomes that this was a year unlike any other. The optimism of the ’60s had curdled into cynicism; art was bleeding into protest, and filmmakers were pushing boundaries few dared cross.

This episode isn’t just about elimination—it’s about exploration. Each cut exposes a tension between old Hollywood and the daring voices of New Hollywood. The moral clarity of the past gives way to ambiguity, violence, and alienation. Even in defeat, these films feel alive—vibrant reflections of a restless nation on the edge of transformation.

The Bracket: From 64 to 16The Taste Buds take no prisoners as they slash the field in half. Beloved underdogs and prestigious heavyweights alike fall victim to the bracket’s brutality.

The discussion spans the full spectrum of 1971 cinema—from intimate character studies to radical experiments in form. What emerges is a portrait of a year obsessed with freedom and consequence, where the line between hero and villain, beauty and ugliness, grows thinner with every decision.

By the end, only 16 films remain—each a contender for the title of 1971 Movie of the Year.

Conclusion: The Revolution ContinuesIf Part One was discovery, Part Two is devastation. The Taste Buds have drawn blood, but the fight is far from over. As 1971 reveals its cinematic DNA—grit, daring, and rebellion—the question grows sharper: what kind of film deserves to define an era?

🎧 Listen now to Movie of the Year: 1971, Part Two. Subscribe, share your reactions, and email your predictions for the next round to popfilterco@gmail.com—because the bracket waits for no one, and 1971 isn’t done breaking hearts.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1971A New Season BeginsWelcome to 1971—The Year Hollywood Broke the RulesThe Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—are back, and this time they’re traveling to one of the most daring and unpredictable years in film history: 1971. With the studio system collapsing and the counterculture in full swing, filmmakers were rewriting the rules, blending art and rebellion into something thrillingly new.

In this season premiere, the Taste Buds launch the 1971 Movie of the Year bracket, cutting 96 movies down to 64 in a massive showdown of ambition, artistry, and pure cinematic chaos. From cult curiosities to forgotten gems, this first round is where history’s deep cuts get their moment in the spotlight.

The Cultural Crossroads of 19711971 wasn’t just another year—it was a cultural collision. The Vietnam War raged, Nixon ruled the airwaves, and young directors were taking cameras into uncharted territory. As the Taste Buds remind us, this was the year American cinema shifted from polished studio spectacle to gritty realism, giving rise to New Hollywood.

Every film in this season premiere carries that revolutionary spark. Some came from the underground; others from studios trying desperately to keep up with changing times. Together, they form a portrait of a moment when film wasn’t just entertainment—it was rebellion.

Deep Cuts and Dangerous Roads: The Films of Round OneBefore the heavy hitters arrive in later rounds, the Taste Buds dig into the unsung heroes of 1971—the strange, the soulful, and the subversive.

• Two-Lane Blacktop: A road movie stripped down to its raw nerves, where the open highway is both promise and punishment.
• Wake in Fright: An Australian fever dream that makes the outback feel like purgatory.
• The Hired Hand: Peter Fonda’s quiet Western about regret, redemption, and a way of life that’s already dying.
• Taking Off: Miloš Forman’s offbeat exploration of American youth, alienation, and generational divide.

Each of these films tells part of the story of 1971: a year where cinema stopped being polite and started getting real.

The Bracket BeginsWith 96 contenders on the board, the Taste Buds must make impossible choices. Which obscure masterpieces deserve to advance? Which early casualties will haunt the rest of the season? The first round is brutal, brilliant, and full of surprises—as only a Movie of the Year bracket can be.

The Revolution Will Be Screened1971 was a year of upheaval, experimentation, and discovery—and this season premiere captures that spirit perfectly. As the Taste Buds trim the list to 64, they set the stage for one of the richest and most unpredictable seasons in Movie of the Year history.

🎧 Listen now to the Movie of the Year: 1971 Season Premiere. Subscribe to the show, share your bracket predictions, and email your early favorites to popfilterco@gmail.com—because the revolution of 1971 has just begun, and only one film will rise to the top.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The Grand Finale (Finale)The End of the 1999 RoadThe moment has arrived. After months of debates, shocking eliminations, and unforgettable arguments, the 1999 Movie of the Year Finale comes to its climactic conclusion. The Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—step into the ring one last time to decide which film will take home the crown as the ultimate 1999 Movie of the Year. Two iconic movies remain. Only one will survive.

The Final Showdown: The Best of 1999The bracket began with dozens of contenders, but it is now down to two giants. The Taste Buds give every moment the dramatic weight it deserves, breaking down performances, set pieces, and cultural impact. Expect arguments that land like body slams, counterpoints that hit like steel chairs, and a final decision that could shock listeners everywhere. The question remains: Which 1999 film will become the undisputed champion?

The Ultimate 1999 AwardsBefore the crown is placed, the Taste Buds hand out the most outrageous and most coveted awards of the season. These categories highlight the wild, unforgettable moments that made 1999 a year like no other:

• Best Sex
• Best Violence
• Best Musical Moment
• Best Actor
• Best Actress

Each award sparks passionate debate, hilarious takes, and surprising winners, ensuring the finale delivers both celebration and chaos.

FAQ About the 1999 Finale PodcastWhat is the 1999 Movie of the Year?

The Taste Buds crown the single film that defines 1999 as the greatest movie year of all time.

Which awards are given in the finale?

The finale features awards for Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Sex Scene, Best Violence, and Best Musical Moment.

Who are the Taste Buds?

Mike, Ryan, and Greg—hosts of the Movie of the Year Podcast, where movies battle for cultural immortality.

A Crown Worth Fighting For1999 gave us masterpieces, cult classics, and blockbusters that defined a generation. But only one film can be crowned 1999 Movie of the Year. Will it be the movie with the strongest performances? The wildest twist? The boldest direction? The Taste Buds decide, and the final verdict is in.

Listen now to Part Three of the finale. Subscribe to Movie of the Year, share the episode with fellow movie lovers, and email us your reactions at popfilterco@gmail.com. Did the Taste Buds get it right, or did your pick for Best 1999 Movie get robbed? Let the debate continue.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The Grand Finale (Part 2)The Road to the FinalsThe bracket heats up in Part Two of the 1999 Movie of the Year Finale, and the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—are back to call every twist, turn, and cinematic takedown. The stakes are higher, the drama is bigger, and the films are fighting harder than ever for a shot at the crown.

The Matchups: Semi-Final ShowdownsOnly four films remain, and the battles are fierce:

• Election vs. The Blair Witch Project – Tracy Flick’s cutthroat ambition goes head-to-head with supernatural terror in the woods. It’s satire vs. found footage, politics vs. paranoia.
• The Limey vs. The Green Mile – Steven Soderbergh’s stylish revenge story steps into the ring with Frank Darabont’s heartbreaking prison epic. Vengeance clashes with miracles, grit with grace.

The Taste Buds don’t just break down the movies—they hype them up like a championship bout, with every argument landing like a body slam.

Special Awards: Comedic Performance, On-Screen Duo & Biggest ShitheadAs if the semi-finals weren’t enough, the Taste Buds also reveal the winners of three special 1999 honors:

• Best Comedic Performance
• Best On-Screen Duo
• Biggest Shithead

The nominees are under wraps, but the winners will spark laughs, debates, and maybe even outrage.

Conclusion: The Fight Isn’t Over YetThe road to the 1999 Movie of the Year crown gets narrower, but the drama only intensifies. Will Election’s political claws cut down the terror of The Blair Witch Project? Can The Limey’s revenge stand tall against The Green Mile’s miracles?

🎧 Listen now to Part Two of the 1999 finale, subscribe to Movie of the Year so you don’t miss the grand conclusion, and email your predictions to popfilterco@gmail.com—because only one movie will survive.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The Grand Finale (Part 1)The Bracket Battles BeginIn this high-stakes episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—step into the ring for Part One of the 1999 Finale. The mission: to complete the bracket and crown the ultimate 1999 Movie of the Year. The energy is off the charts, the drama is turned up to eleven, and every matchup is a fight for cinematic survival.

The Matchups: Clash of the 1999 TitansEight legendary films enter, but only four will survive this round:

• Fight Club vs. The Iron Giant – A brutal, brawling philosophy lesson takes on animated heart and heroism.
• Run Lola Run vs. Notting Hill – Adrenaline-fueled German precision sprints headlong into British charm and rom com delight.
• Election vs. The Blair Witch Project – Satire and scheming clash with found-footage horror that redefined fear.
• The Limey vs. The Green Mile – Soderbergh’s fractured revenge tale faces off against Darabont’s prison-set epic of miracles and loss.

The Taste Buds call every blow, every twist, every knockout punch on the way to the semifinals.

Best Supporting Actor and Best Supporting Actress AwardsAs if the bracket wasn’t enough, the Taste Buds also hand out their 1999 Best Supporting Actor and Best Supporting Actress Awards. The nominees? You’ll have to listen to find out—but expect iconic performances, shocking picks, and plenty of heated debate.

The Drama of 1999 CinemaThis isn’t just a podcast—it’s a war for cinematic supremacy. With every argument, joke, and hot take, the Taste Buds bring the kind of passion that only 1999 movies deserve. These films didn’t just entertain—they defined an era, and now they fight for the ultimate crown.

Call to Action: Who Wins Your Bracket?Now it’s your turn, listeners! 🎧

• Listen now to the 1999 Movie of the Year Finale, Part One.
• Subscribe to the Movie of the Year Podcast for the next two parts of the finale.
• Email us at popfilterco@gmail.com with your predictions, your favorite supporting performances, and your pick for the 1999 Movie of the Year.

Conclusion: The Road to the Crown Begins HereFrom Fight Club to The Green Mile, from supporting legends to surprise underdogs, Part One of the 1999 Movie of the Year Finale has it all. The Taste Buds bring the drama, the laughs, and the ultimate passion as the greatest year in movies fights for its champion.

🎧 Step into the ring—because this is only the beginning.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999Notting Hill (feat. John Brooks from 1999: The Podcast!)Revisiting Notting Hill (1999)In this episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds watch Notting Hill (1999), the beloved romantic comedy pairing Hugh Grant and Julia Roberts. More than just a love story, Notting Hill combines sharp humor, traditional rom-com tropes, and a commentary on celebrity culture that remains resonant today. The Taste Buds break down why this film remains one of the defining romantic comedies of the late 1990s.

The Ensemble in Notting Hill (1999)While the romance between Grant and Roberts takes the spotlight, Notting Hill is also a showcase for its ensemble cast. From Rhys Ifans’ unforgettable turn as Spike to the quirky group of friends who surround William Thacker, the ensemble adds heart, comedy, and texture to the story. The Taste Buds highlight how this cast transforms the film into a community tale, grounding the romance in authentic relationships.

Rom Com Tropes in Notting HillAs a romantic comedy, Notting Hill embraces—and occasionally subverts—the genre’s staples. The Taste Buds dissect the meet-cute, the “will they/won’t they” dynamic, and the grand romantic gesture, exploring how Notting Hill both honors and updates these familiar rom-com beats. They also discuss how it compares to other best 1990s romantic comedies and why its formula still works today.

Celebrity Culture and Notting Hill’s Love StoryAt its heart, Notting Hill is about ordinary life colliding with the world of celebrity culture. Julia Roberts’ character Anna Scott, a Hollywood superstar, struggles to build a relationship with William, a humble bookshop owner. The Taste Buds unpack how the film uses fame, privacy, and the media spotlight to complicate romance, showing both the allure and the challenges of dating under public scrutiny.

Guest Panelist: John Brooks from 1999: The PodcastSpecial guest John Brooks, host of 1999: The Podcast, joins the panel to offer his expertise on late-‘90s pop culture and cinema. John provides insight into why Notting Hill connected so deeply with audiences in 1999, how it stacks up against other rom coms of the decade, and its lasting cultural impact. His contribution adds depth and historical perspective to the conversation.

Bonus Segment: Eyes Wide Shut (1999)For a completely different take on love and intimacy in 1999, the Taste Buds dive into Stanley Kubrick’s enigmatic final film, Eyes Wide Shut. They explore its surreal look at marriage, secrecy, and desire, and contrast it with the lighthearted optimism of Notting Hill. Together, these two films showcase the remarkable range of cinema in 1999.

FAQ About Notting Hill (1999) Podcast EpisodeWhat is Notting Hill about?

It follows William, a bookshop owner, whose life changes when he falls for Anna Scott, a world-famous actress.

Why is Notting Hill considered a classic rom-com?

Its witty dialogue, memorable characters, and blend of romance and social commentary helped define the romantic comedy genre for a new era.

Who stars in Notting Hill (1999)?

Hugh Grant, Julia Roberts, Rhys Ifans, and a strong ensemble cast.

Conclusion: Why Notting Hill Still CharmsMore than two decades later, Notting Hill (1999) remains one of the quintessential romantic comedies. With its ensemble cast, timeless rom-com tropes, and thoughtful take on celebrity culture, the film continues to resonate with audiences around the world. With guest John Brooks and a bonus look at Eyes Wide Shut, this episode of Movie of the Year is a must-listen for rom-com fans and cinephiles alike.

🎧 Listen now to our Notting Hill podcast review, subscribe to Movie of the Year, and email us your thoughts at popfilterco@gmail.com.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The Limey (feat. Adam Kempenaar from Filmspotting)Why The Limey Still Packs a PunchIn this episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds turn their sights on The Limey (1999), Steven Soderbergh’s sharp revenge thriller about grief, family, and memory. Mixing classic crime tropes with experimental editing, The Limey is both a gripping noir and an impressionistic meditation on loss. With Terence Stamp delivering a career-defining performance, the film remains one of Soderbergh’s most daring works.

1960s vs 1990s in The LimeyAt the heart of The Limey lies a conversation between two eras. Terence Stamp’s Wilson—a hardened ex-con from the swinging London of the 1960s—arrives in neon-soaked Los Angeles of the 1990s to uncover the truth about his daughter’s death. The Taste Buds discuss how the film contrasts the ideals, aesthetics, and morality of these decades, using Wilson’s journey as both a cultural clash and a generational reckoning.

Steven Soderbergh’s Directing Style in The LimeyKnown for pushing boundaries, Steven Soderbergh infuses The Limey with fractured editing, nonlinear storytelling, and the haunting use of flashbacks. The Taste Buds break down how these stylistic choices elevate a standard revenge plot into a hypnotic piece of cinema. They also explore how The Limey connects to Soderbergh’s other 1999 classic, Out of Sight, and how his experimental style paved the way for his 2000s successes.

Family, Revenge, and The Limey’s Emotional CoreWhile The Limey is structured like a thriller, its true heartbeat lies in themes of family and redemption. Wilson’s grief over his daughter and his desperate search for answers give the film unexpected emotional weight. The Taste Buds explore how family drives the story forward, turning vengeance into something deeply human and heartbreaking.

Guest Panelist: Adam Kempenaar from FilmspottingJoining this week’s episode is Adam Kempenaar, host of the long-running podcast Filmspotting. Adam brings decades of cinephile experience and critical insight to the discussion, offering a deeper look at Soderbergh’s influence and the lasting cultural relevance of The Limey. His perspective helps connect the film to both classic noir traditions and contemporary cinema.

Listen to Filmspotting here!

Bonus Segment: 10 Things I Hate About You (1999)The Taste Buds balance The Limey’s brooding intensity with a bonus discussion of 10 Things I Hate About You, the teen comedy that reimagines Shakespeare for the 1990s. They break down the film’s clever script, breakout performances from Heath Ledger and Julia Stiles, and how it epitomizes the teen movie boom of the decade. Together, the two films showcase the remarkable range of 1999 cinema.

FAQ About The Limey Podcast EpisodeWhat is The Limey (1999) about?

The film follows Wilson (Terence Stamp), an ex-con who travels to Los Angeles to investigate his daughter’s mysterious death.

Why is Steven Soderbergh’s style in The Limey unique?

Through nonlinear editing, impressionistic flashbacks, and tonal shifts, Soderbergh transforms a revenge story into an artful meditation on grief and memory.

Why is family important in the film?

Wilson’s pursuit of justice is rooted in his love for his daughter, giving the film a core of emotional authenticity.

Why The Limey EnduresMore than two decades later, The Limey (1999) remains one of Steven Soderbergh’s most powerful and stylish works. By contrasting the 1960s and 1990s, experimenting with cinematic form, and grounding the story in themes of family, the film still resonates with audiences today. With Adam Kempenaar’s insights and a bonus 10 Things I Hate About You segment, this episode of Movie of the Year is a must-listen for cinephiles and pop culture fans alike.

🎧 Listen now to the Limey (1999) podcast episode and subscribe to Movie of the Year for more deep dives into 1999 classics. Some ghosts can’t be forgotten, and some films never fade—discover why Soderbergh’s The Limey still matters.

View Details

Movie of the Year 1999The 1999 Primetime Movie DraftThe draft is back—and it’s time to finish building the ultimate 1999 TV network! In this second and final installment of the Movie of the Year Podcast’s 1999 TV Draft, the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—return to battle it out for TV supremacy. With their first-round picks locked in from last week, the stakes are even higher as they fill out their lineups, argue over strategy, and fight for the crown of Prime-Time King.

The Final Rounds: Completing the LineupsWith the children’s show, network sitcom, network drama, non-network scripted show, unscripted show, and wild card categories still in play, every choice matters. The snake draft continues, and this week’s episode sees the Taste Buds strategizing, scheming, and occasionally sabotaging each other to build the most unbeatable channel of 1999.

Deep Dive: The Best TV Shows of 1999If the first half of the draft was about setting the foundation, this finale is all about going big. The hosts revisit 1999’s best shows with fresh context and clever analysis, highlighting why this year was such a groundbreaking moment in television. From the golden age of network dramas to the wild rise of reality TV, every pick is fueled by nostalgia—and more than a few heated debates.

Who Really Won?After all the picks are in, the Taste Buds compare their completed lineups and make their cases for victory. Who built the channel that would have crushed the Nielsen ratings in 1999? Which draft choices aged like fine wine, and which ones were pure Y2K panic? Listen in to hear their verdicts—and then cast your own vote by emailing popfilterco@gmail.com with your pick for the winner.

Nostalgia, Laughs, and the End of the DraftThis finale isn’t just about competition; it’s a celebration of the year that changed TV forever. The Taste Buds look back on the cultural impact of these shows, share behind-the-scenes trivia, and crack each other up along the way. It’s a perfect blend of humor, pop culture insight, and pure 1999 nostalgia.

FAQ About the 1999 TV DraftWhat is a TV draft?

Just like fantasy sports, but instead of athletes, you’re drafting TV shows to build your dream lineup.

What categories do they draft?

Each Taste Bud must pick:

• A children’s show
• A network sitcom
• A network drama
• A non-network scripted show
• An unscripted show
• A wild card

Who are the hosts?

The Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—are your guides through all things pop culture, blending expertise and comedy in every episode.

How can I join the fun?

Subscribe to the podcast and email your own 1999 lineup—or vote on the winner—at popfilterco@gmail.com.

The Grand Finale: A Trip Back to 1999Whether you’ve been following since Part 1 or are just jumping in now, this second episode delivers the laughs, debates, and nostalgia that make Movie of the Year a must-listen. From the draft drama to the final showdown, this is your ticket back to the golden era of television.

Listen now, subscribe to the Movie of the Year Podcast, and share this epic two-part draft with every pop culture fan you know.

View Details

Movie of the Year 1999The 1999 Primetime Movie DraftWhat happens when you take the rules of fantasy sports and apply them to television? In this special Movie of the Year Podcast episode, the Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—compete in the 1999 TV Draft to create the most unbeatable prime-time lineup. Using a snake draft format, each Taste Bud must carefully choose shows across categories to form the ultimate channel designed to dominate ratings and win over viewers.

How the 1999 TV Draft WorksHere’s the setup: each participant must draft six shows from 1999. The categories include:

• A children’s show
• A network sitcom
• A network drama
• A non-network scripted show
• An unscripted show
• A wild card

By the end, the Taste Buds will have created three competing networks—and the audience gets to decide who built the strongest lineup.

Best TV Shows of 1999: A Year of Prime-Time GoldThe year 1999 wasn’t just about Fight Club and The Sixth Sense—it was also a landmark year for television. From beloved children’s programming to edgy dramas and reality TV’s first wave, 1999 offered a wide spectrum of shows that shaped culture. This episode dives deep into the best TV shows of 1999, giving each pick context, nostalgia, and plenty of jokes.

Who Won the Draft? Competitive Spirit in ActionThe Taste Buds argue passionately for their picks, roasting each other’s choices and defending their own. Which fictional lineup would have pulled the biggest Nielsen ratings? Which network would have ruled the late ‘90s? Tune in to hear who the panel thinks came out on top—and then email in your thoughts to popfilterco@gmail.com.

Bonus Laughs and NostalgiaLike all good Movie of the Year episodes, this draft is more than competition—it’s a love letter to pop culture. The Taste Buds reflect on the impact of these shows, debate their legacies, and remind listeners why 1999 remains one of the most exciting years for TV.

FAQ About the 1999 TV DraftWhat is a TV draft?

A TV draft works just like a fantasy sports draft, except instead of players, you’re drafting TV shows to build the best possible lineup.

What are the categories for this draft?

Each Taste Bud must pick a children’s show, a network sitcom, a network drama, a non-network scripted show, an unscripted show, and a wild card.

Who are the hosts of Movie of the Year?

The Taste Buds—Mike, Ryan, and Greg—are longtime podcasters and pop culture experts who debate and laugh their way through movies, TV, and more.

How can listeners participate?

Subscribe, email in your own line-ups, or vote on who you think won by emailing popfilterco@gmail.com.

Final Thoughts: The Ultimate 1999 Nostalgia TripWhether you grew up watching these shows or you’re discovering them for the first time, the 1999 TV Draft is a hilarious trip back to one of television’s most iconic years. With categories spanning all of prime time and a competitive snake draft format, the Taste Buds bring humor, analysis, and nostalgia to every pick.

🎧 Listen now, subscribe to the Movie of the Year Podcast, and share this episode with fellow TV and pop culture fans.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999Three Kings (feat. Best Movie Year Ever author Brian Raftery!)In this episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds dive deep into Three Kings, the 1999 Gulf War satire movie directed by David O. Russell. Set in the aftermath of the Persian Gulf War, the film follows a group of U.S. soldiers—played by George Clooney, Ice Cube, and Mark Wahlberg—as they set out on a gold heist and instead face the moral complexities of war. This Three Kings movie blends action, comedy, and political commentary while paying homage to war films of the past.

War and Morality in the 1999 Three Kings MovieWe explore how Three Kings uses the Gulf War setting to comment on U.S. foreign policy, the chaos of post-war Iraq, and the blurred lines between heroism and self-interest. The film is not just a war movie—it’s a war satire and a war comedy-drama rolled into one, making it a unique entry in late-90s cinema.

David O. Russell’s Bold Directing StyleFrom unconventional camera techniques to sharp tonal shifts, Three Kings is a prime example of David O. Russell’s fearless filmmaking. We discuss how his approach, both on and off set, shaped the movie’s lasting legacy and why it stands apart from other Gulf War movies.

Three King's Multicultural Cast Redefines the War GenreWith a diverse lineup that includes Clooney, Wahlberg, and Ice Cube, Three Kings challenges typical casting for war movies. We break down how the characters’ backgrounds and performances enhance the story’s authenticity and cultural reach.

Guest Panelist: Brian RafteryJoining us is Brian Raftery, author of the upcoming book on Hannibal Lecter’s cinematic history. Brian also created the acclaimed Ringer mini-series Mission Accomplished, chronicling the making of Three Kings and the tension between David O. Russell and his cast. His behind-the-scenes insight adds depth you won’t find anywhere else.

Find all of Brian Raftery's everything here, including his book Best. Year. Ever. How 1999 Blew Up The Big Screen.

Bonus Segment: Magnolia (1999)As a special treat, the Taste Buds also discuss Paul Thomas Anderson’s sprawling epic Magnolia, another standout from the cinematic powerhouse year of 1999. They examine how both Magnolia and Three Kings reflect the ambitious, risk-taking spirit of late-90s filmmaking.

Whether you’re a longtime fan or discovering it for the first time, our Three Kings podcast episode offers fresh insights into one of the boldest war films of the decade. Listen now to hear how this Gulf War satire still resonates today.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The Sixth Sense (feat. Jay Sherer!)Chilling Classics and Narrative Genius in The Sixth SenseIn this spine-tingling episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds turn their third eyes toward M. Night Shyamalan’s unforgettable thriller, The Sixth Sense. Released in 1999, this film didn't just scare audiences—it redefined what moviegoers expected from psychological thrillers and suspenseful ghost stories. The Taste Buds examine what made The Sixth Sense an instant classic and how it continues to haunt and inspire audiences to this day.

The Sixth Sense's Twist Ending: Spoiler Alert (Sort Of)You know the twist—but how did we get there? The Taste Buds break down the legendary ending of The Sixth Sense, discussing how Shyamalan masterfully planted clues throughout the film. This segment explores how the reveal reshaped the entire narrative, altered how we engage with movies, and elevated twist endings to a pop culture staple. It’s one of the most talked-about twist endings in cinematic history, and for good reason.

Death and Horror in The Sixth Sense: What Scares Us MostAt its core, The Sixth Sense is a meditation on death, grief, and unresolved trauma. The Taste Buds explore how the film uses horror to probe deeper emotional truths, crafting scares not from jump cuts alone, but from the deeply human fear of being unseen and unheard. This is horror with heart—and it hits hard, echoing themes found in other 1999 horror films like The Blair Witch Project.

The Sixth Sense Performances: Toni Collette Deserved an OscarBeyond its eerie mood and smart script, The Sixth Sense shines thanks to stunning performances. Haley Joel Osment delivers one of the most iconic child performances in movie history, and Bruce Willis brings a quiet depth to a role that surprises in more ways than one. The Taste Buds also spotlight Toni Collette’s heartbreaking turn as a mother grappling with the unknown. The performances anchor the film’s emotional weight and elevate the ghost story to something transcendent.

Guest Panelist Jay Sherer: Talking Story with The Story GeeksThis week’s episode features special guest Jay Sherer, host of The Story Geeks Podcast. Jay brings his storytelling expertise and love for genre film to help unpack why The Sixth Sense is more than just a horror movie—it's a masterclass in character, pacing, and emotional resonance. Jay also draws fascinating comparisons to other narrative-driven films, such as Unbreakable and Signs.

Bonus Segment: Enter Fight ClubIn a special bonus segment, the Taste Buds take on another 1999 mind-bender: Fight Club. What connects Fight Club and The Sixth Sense beyond their jaw-dropping endings? The Taste Buds compare their thematic undercurrents, narrative structures, and cultural impacts, offering fresh perspectives on how these two films reflect the anxieties of the late 1990s. It’s a one-two punch of psychological cinema that still packs a wallop.

FAQ About The Sixth Sense Podcast EpisodeWho is Jay Sherer?

Jay Sherer is the host of The Story Geeks Podcast, a show that dives deep into the themes and structure of genre storytelling.

Why is The Sixth Sense still relevant today?

Its emotional core, brilliant performances, and unforgettable twist make it a timeless classic that continues to inspire filmmakers.

Final Thoughts: We See Greatness in The Sixth SenseWhether you're revisiting The Sixth Sense for the first time in years or analyzing its ghostly layers for the hundredth time, this episode of Movie of the Year delivers sharp analysis, lively discussion, and plenty of surprises. From death and horror to unforgettable performances and twist endings, the Taste Buds see what others might miss.

🎧 Listen now, subscribe to Movie of the Year, and share this haunting episode with fellow movie lovers.

Check out the rest of the 1999 season, which includes movies like

Run Lola Run!

South Park!

The Iron Giant!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999All About My Mother vs. The MummyWhen Pedro Met PopcornIn this special bonus podcast episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds take a detour from draft formats and single-film deep dives to bring you a dynamic double feature: Pedro Almodóvar’s All About My Mother (1999) and Stephen Sommers’ The Mummy (1999). One is an emotionally complex, internationally acclaimed art film. The other is a crowd-pleasing adventure spectacle. And yet—they share more than you might think.

This podcast review examines how both films, in vastly different genres and tones, serve as love letters to the movies that came before them. Whether referencing classic melodrama or 1930s monster movies, All About My Mother and The Mummy demonstrate that the films of 1999 have a cinematic legacy as enduring as their memory.

All About My Mother (1999) Movie Review: The Emotional EpicPedro Almodóvar’s All About My Mother is an intricate, compassionate examination of motherhood, identity, and grief. The film is suffused with references to cinema—from All About Eve to A Streetcar Named Desire. The Taste Buds analyze how Almodóvar uses visual language and character archetypes to update and honor classic Hollywood and European melodramas, while giving voice to marginalized characters rarely centered on screen.

The Mummy (1999) Movie Discussion: A Popcorn Adventure with Classic RootsIn contrast, The Mummy updates the 1930s Universal monster movies for a late-’90s audience. With Brendan Fraser as a swashbuckling hero and Rachel Weisz as a brainy librarian-turned-explorer, the film balances horror, comedy, and romance in a pulpy, action-packed romp. The Taste Buds explore how The Mummy evokes the spirit of early adventure films while reinventing its archetypes for a modern audience.

Cinema About Cinema: Film History as FoundationDespite their differences, All About My Mother and The Mummy are united by their referentiality. Both films use a rich knowledge of film history—not as a crutch, but as a launching point. Almodóvar weaves old film tropes into new emotional truths. Sommers crafts a blockbuster that lovingly revives and retools a genre. The Taste Buds discuss how both directors use nostalgia not as imitation, but as inspiration.

The Taste Buds Dig In: Movie Podcast Panel ReactionsThe panelists share their favorite moments from both films, comparing the emotional stakes, visual aesthetics, and thematic resonance. How does The Mummy’s big-budget spectacle stack up against the intimate drama of All About My Mother? Which film aged better? And what do they reveal about what cinema meant in 1999?

Different Genres, Same Passion for CinemaAll About My Mother and The Mummy may live in different cinematic universes, but both show how the movies of 1999 mined the rich soil of film history to grow something bold and fresh. Whether it’s Pedro Almodóvar’s poignant melodrama or Stephen Sommers’ thrilling adventure, both films prove that storytelling evolves through homage and reinvention.

🎧 Listen now to this bonus episode of Movie of the Year—your go-to movie podcast for deep dives into the greatest films of 1999—and celebrate the dual brilliance of All About My Mother and The Mummy.

📲 Subscribe to Movie of the Year for more deep dives into 1999’s most memorable films, including bonus episodes like this one covering All About My Mother and The Mummy.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999Run Lola Run (feat. Keith Phipps!)Why Run Lola Run Still Speeds AheadIn this high-octane episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds tackle Tom Tykwer’s groundbreaking film Run Lola Run, one of the most iconic international films of 1999. Through frenetic pacing, looping timelines, and multimedia storytelling, Run Lola Run challenged narrative norms and redefined cinematic structure for a generation.

Joined by guest film critic Keith Phipps, co-host of Your Next Picture Show, the panel examines what makes Run Lola Run a modern classic. They also revisit horror history in a bonus segment about The Blair Witch Project.

Lola: Run Lola Run’s Unstoppable HeroineFranka Potente’s Lola is a force of nature. With her fire-red hair and relentless sprint through Berlin, she embodies urgency, love, and power. The Taste Buds explore Lola’s role as more than just a protagonist—she’s a symbol of agency, chance, and emotional propulsion. Why does Lola resonate so deeply with audiences 25 years later?

Time, Destiny, and Choice in Run Lola RunAt the core of Run Lola Run is a meditation on fate, free will, and chaos theory. Through its triptych structure—three timelines with radically different outcomes—Run Lola Run asks: what if one second could change everything? The Taste Buds dissect how the film explores the butterfly effect, choice vs. destiny, and the role of memory in shaping the future.

Multimedia Mayhem: The Visual Language of Run Lola RunThis movie was ahead of its time in visual storytelling. Tykwer fuses live-action footage, flash animation, time-lapse photography, and techno music into a pulse-pounding montage. The panel breaks down how the film’s use of multimedia created a hyper-stylized, immersive experience that continues to influence filmmakers today.

Guest Panelist: Keith Phipps from Your Next Picture ShowFilm critic and podcast host Keith Phipps joins the Taste Buds to bring his expertise on European cinema, genre-bending narratives, and 1999’s cinematic landscape. As a founding editor of The A.V. Club and co-host of Your Next Picture Show, Keith provides sharp context and deep analysis that elevate the episode’s exploration of Run Lola Run.

Bonus Segment: The Blair Witch Project and Found Footage InnovationIn a special bonus segment, the Taste Buds revisit another 1999 cultural landmark: The Blair Witch Project. They discuss the film’s revolutionary use of found footage, viral marketing, and psychological horror. How did this minimalist thriller terrify a generation and launch a new genre? The Taste Buds dig into the mythology, legacy, and impact of this indie phenomenon.

Related Episodes You’ll Love* South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut – 1999 Movie Podcast * The Green Mile - 1999 Movie of the Year * The Iron Giant – 1999 Movie Podcast

Final Thoughts: Run Lola Run as a Cultural SprintThis movie isn’t just a 1999 film—it’s a cultural event that captured the anxiety, optimism, and possibility of a new millennium. Through Lola’s sheer willpower and the film’s bold narrative experiments, it challenges us to rethink how stories are told—and how our choices shape the future.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut (feat. Nate Ragolia!)Why South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut Still MattersIn this hilariously unfiltered episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds revisit the notorious 1999 film South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut. Blending satirical genius with musical chaos, the movie left a cultural impact, and the Taste Buds are here to explore how it still resonates 25 years later.

With its fearless takedown of American censorship, over-the-top commentary on masculinity, and rare-for-its-time portrayal of homosexuality, South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut is more than just fart jokes and foul language. It’s a surprisingly poignant time capsule of late-‘90s anxiety, and the Taste Buds break it all down.

Censorship in South Park: Bigger, Longer, and UncutNo movie waged war with the MPAA quite like this one. The Taste Buds analyze how South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut skewers moral panic, parental outrage, and the hypocrisy of the film rating system. From the “R” rating controversy to the meta-commentary built into the plot, this section reveals why censorship is the film’s true villain.

Masculinity and War: Boys Being BoysSouth Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut builds its central conflict around immature boys triggering a global catastrophe. The Taste Buds examine how the film employs absurd humor to expose the fragility of masculinity and the toxic expectations society places on young men. Expect debate on whether Cartman is the id of American manhood—or just a chaotic neutral goblin.

Homosexuality and Big Gay Al: A Queer SubtextIn a surprising turn for a 1999 mainstream animated movie, South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut includes a sympathetic queer character in Big Gay Al. The Taste Buds discuss the film’s portrayal of homosexuality, including its satirical (yet sincere) celebration of queer identity. From Saddam and Satan’s toxic romance to the hopeful notes of Big Gay Al’s song, the film blends camp and commentary in unexpected ways.

Guest Panelist: Nate Ragolia from Debut BuddiesSpecial guest Nate Ragolia, co-host of the movie podcast Debut Buddies, joins this episode with insightful takes and a deep appreciation for chaos. Nate helps the Taste Buds unpack why South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut still resonates today, from its musical theater references to its unflinching (and hilarious) view of American culture.

Related Episodes You’ll Love:* The Iron Giant – 1999 Movie Podcast * The Green Mile – 1999 Movie Podcast * The Action Figures Draft – Movie of the Year

Final Thoughts: Revisiting South Park: Bigger, Longer, and UncutSouth Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut is more than a relic of juvenile rebellion—it’s a cultural commentary wrapped in fart jokes and musical numbers. Whether you’re a longtime fan or revisiting it for the first time, the Taste Buds’ discussion offers new reasons to appreciate the film’s satire, boldness, and weird emotional resonance.

Stream the episode now and rediscover why South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut still punches up, punches through, and—occasionally—sings its way into our hearts.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The Action Figure Draft, Part IIDrafting the Ultimate 1999 Action FiguresIn this action-packed and comedic finale of the Movie of the Year podcast, the Taste Buds complete their dream teams of 1999 movie characters in The Action Figures Draft. Inspired by Dungeons & Dragons character classes like Bard, Cleric, Druid, Fighter, and Wizard, each panelist must create the most powerful and ridiculous team of would-be action figures.

From cult favorites to blockbuster icons, no character is off-limits in this chaotic snake draft showdown. Whether you're here for the laughs or the nostalgia, this episode blends pop culture nerdery with competitive spirit.

What Is the Action Figures Draft?The Action Figures Draft is where the Taste Buds channel their inner dungeon masters to pick a five-member team of fictional characters from 1999 films. The twist? Each character must fill a D&D role: Bard, Cleric, Druid, Fighter, and Wizard.

Each panelist—including guest Taste Bud Taylor—must strategize their picks while balancing power, flair, and absurdity. Do you build the strongest team? Or the weirdest shelf of plastic heroes?

1999 Movies Meet Dungeons & DragonsThis isn't just about cool characters. It's about team synergy and hilarious storytelling. The Taste Buds debate who makes a better Fighter: Neo or The Mummy’s Rick O’Connell? Should you pick The Blair Witch for Druid just for the chaos? What accessories would The Iron Giant’s action figure come with?

The draft style is classic snake format, so the stakes rise with each passing round. The Taste Buds argue, laugh, and justify their boldest choices.

Meet the Draft Teams: Bard, Cleric, Druid & More Bard – Most charismatic or musical pick * Cleric – The team’s support and healing presence * Druid – Nature-powered, mystical, or shape-shifting characters * Fighter – The brute strength, heavy-hitter type * Wizard* – Powers, tech, or unexplained magic

Special Guest Taste Bud: TaylorReturning guest Taylor adds their signature unpredictable energy to the panel. Known for deep pulls and unfiltered commentary, Taylor’s presence ensures that this draft spirals into the delightfully absurd.

Related Episodes You’ll Love:* The Green Mile * The Iron Giant * Election

Final Thoughts: The Best Action Figures That Never WereThe Action Figures Draft proves that 1999 movie characters are still larger than life—and perfect for plastic. Whether you're a longtime fan of Movie of the Year or just want to imagine Jar Jar Binks as your team’s Bard, this is an episode you won’t want to miss.

Listen now to the Action Figures Draft and decide which team of imaginary toys reigns supreme!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The Action Figure DraftDrafting the Ultimate 1999 Action FiguresIn this action-packed and comedic episode of the Movie of the Year podcast, the Taste Buds assemble their dream teams of 1999 movie characters in The Action Figures Draft. Inspired by Dungeons & Dragons character classes like Bard, Cleric, Druid, Fighter, and Wizard, each panelist must create the most powerful and ridiculous team of would-be action figures.

From cult favorites to blockbuster icons, no character is off-limits in this chaotic snake draft showdown. Whether you're here for the laughs or the nostalgia, this episode blends pop culture nerdery with competitive spirit.

What Is the Action Figures Draft?The Action Figures Draft is where the Taste Buds channel their inner dungeon masters to pick a five-member team of fictional characters from 1999 films. The twist? Each character must fill a D&D role: Bard, Cleric, Druid, Fighter, and Wizard.

Each panelist—including guest Taste Bud Taylor—must strategize their picks while balancing power, flair, and absurdity. Do you build the strongest team? Or the weirdest shelf of plastic heroes?

1999 Movies Meet Dungeons & DragonsThis isn't just about cool characters. It's about team synergy and hilarious storytelling. The Taste Buds debate who makes a better Fighter: Neo or The Mummy’s Rick O’Connell? Should you pick The Blair Witch for Druid just for the chaos? What accessories would The Iron Giant’s action figure come with?

The draft style is classic snake format, so the stakes rise with each passing round. The Taste Buds argue, laugh, and justify their boldest choices.

Meet the Draft Teams: Bard, Cleric, Druid & More Bard – Most charismatic or musical pick * Cleric – The team’s support and healing presence * Druid – Nature-powered, mystical, or shape-shifting characters * Fighter – The brute strength, heavy-hitter type * Wizard* – Powers, tech, or unexplained magic

Special Guest Taste Bud: TaylorReturning guest Taylor adds their signature unpredictable energy to the panel. Known for deep pulls and unfiltered commentary, Taylor’s presence ensures that this draft spirals into the delightfully absurd.

Related Episodes You’ll Love:* The Green Mile * The Iron Giant * Election

Final Thoughts: The Best Action Figures That Never WereThe Action Figures Draft proves that 1999 movie characters are still larger than life—and perfect for plastic. Whether you're a longtime fan of Movie of the Year or just want to imagine Jar Jar Binks as your team’s Bard, this is an episode you won’t want to miss.

Listen now to the Action Figures Draft and decide which team of imaginary toys reigns supreme!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The Iron Giant (feat. Kate Dellis!)Introduction: Why The Iron Giant Still MattersIn this episode of the Movie of the Year podcast, the Taste Buds explore the enduring appeal of The Iron Giant, Brad Bird’s 1999 animated masterpiece. The podcast delves into how the film’s powerful themes, from Cold War anxiety to a redefinition of masculinity, continue to resonate with audiences.

Whether you’re an animation aficionado or a first-time viewer, this deep dive into Brad Bird's masterpiece highlights why it remains a defining piece of cinematic art.

War and Fear: The Cold War in The Iron GiantSet in 1950s America, the film uses its period setting to mirror the paranoia and tension of the Cold War. The Taste Buds analyze how the film reflects societal fears of the unknown and the consequences of militarization.

With the government’s aggressive pursuit of the Giant symbolizing real-world escalation, the episode illustrates how the film's anti-war message is as relevant today as it was in 1999.

Masculinity and Emotion: Redefining the Hero in The Iron GiantThe movie reimagines masculinity through its characters’ emotional depth. The Taste Buds break down how Hogarth’s bravery, Dean’s unconventional masculinity, and the Giant’s compassion offer a fresh take on heroism.

By challenging traditional gender roles and emphasizing vulnerability, the film delivers a powerful commentary on what it means to be truly strong.

A New Style of Animation: Artistry in MotionThe podcast dives into The Iron Giant’s distinctive animation style, blending traditional 2D with early CGI to create a timeless visual aesthetic. The Taste Buds discuss Brad Bird’s directorial choices and how the film’s clean lines, muted palette, and expressive character designs contributed to its cult status.

This segment also touches on the film’s place in animation history and why it remains influential.

Guest Panelist Spotlight: Kate Dellis from WGBHSpecial guest Kate Dellis, a producer at WGBH, joins the Taste Buds to offer her unique perspective on The Iron Giant. Kate shares insights into the film’s emotional complexity and artistic innovation.

Her thoughtful analysis helps elevate the discussion and adds depth to the podcast’s exploration of the movie’s legacy.

Additional Resources Brad Bird on The Iron Giant’s Legacy – NPR * Animation World Network on The Iron Giant * Movie of the Year: The Green Mile* Episode

Final Thoughts: The Iron Giant Still SoarsTwenty-five years after its release, The Iron Giant continues to inspire with its timeless message of peace, compassion, and identity. On this episode of the Movie of the Year podcast, the Taste Buds and guest Kate Dellis reveal how the film’s themes of war, masculinity, and groundbreaking animation combine to create a true classic.

If you love thoughtful movie analysis and want to understand why The Iron Giant remains essential viewing, this episode is a must-listen.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The Mixtape, Part IIThe Taste Buds are hitting rewind and building the ultimate 1999 Mixtape on this week’s episode of Movie of the Year. As part of their ongoing exploration of the legendary pop culture landscape of 1999, the panel steps away from film to focus on the best songs of 1999, one track at a time.

Whether you were burning mix CDs or glued to TRL, this is the Movie of the Year episode for you.

Why 1999 Was a Great Year for Music1999 was a genre-smashing year, marked by massive pop breakthroughs, alt-rock classics, club hits, and iconic hip-hop. From …Baby One More Time to Smooth, No Scrubs to My Name Is, the year’s musical output was unforgettable.

To honor this sonic time capsule, the Taste Buds drafted their ideal 1999 playlist—20 songs, no repeat artists, and only the strongest tracks.

How the 1999 Mixtape Was MadeHere were the rules:

• 20 songs
• No repeat artists
• Picks made live on the episode

Each host took turns drafting songs, defending their picks, and sabotaging each other’s plans. With only one track per artist, every decision mattered. Some fan-favorites made the list, while others were tragically left out.

Related Links* 1999 in Music (Wikipedia) * Genius Lyrics – Top Songs of 1999 * TRL Memories: MTV's Golden Era

Why This 1999 Mixtape Is EssentialThe 1999 Mixtape episode is a celebration of one of the most fun and influential years in music history. Every genre got its moment in the sun, and this playlist reflects that beautiful mess. It's not just a trip down memory lane—it's a living, breathing artifact of a year that changed everything.

Perfect for anyone who loves pop culture, nostalgia, or music history, this is one of the most fun Movie of the Year episodes yet.

Subscribe now to follow the rest of the 1999 season and never miss a beat.

Movie of the Year: 1999 Mixtape – streaming now on all podcast platforms.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The MixtapeThe Taste Buds are hitting rewind and building the ultimate 1999 Mixtape on this week’s episode of Movie of the Year. As part of their ongoing exploration of the legendary pop culture landscape of 1999, the panel steps away from film to focus on the best songs of 1999, one track at a time.

Whether you were burning mix CDs or glued to TRL, this is the Movie of the Year episode for you.

Why 1999 Was a Great Year for Music1999 was a genre-smashing year, marked by massive pop breakthroughs, alt-rock classics, club hits, and iconic hip-hop. From …Baby One More Time to Smooth, No Scrubs to My Name Is, the year’s musical output was unforgettable.

To honor this sonic time capsule, the Taste Buds drafted their ideal 1999 playlist—20 songs, no repeat artists, and only the strongest tracks.

How the 1999 Mixtape Was MadeHere were the rules:

• 20 songs
• No repeat artists
• Picks made live on the episode

Each host took turns drafting songs, defending their picks, and sabotaging each other’s plans. With only one track per artist, every decision mattered. Some fan-favorites made the list, while others were tragically left out.

Related Links* 1999 in Music (Wikipedia) * Genius Lyrics – Top Songs of 1999 * TRL Memories: MTV's Golden Era

Why This 1999 Mixtape Is EssentialThe 1999 Mixtape episode is a celebration of one of the most fun and influential years in music history. Every genre got its moment in the sun, and this playlist reflects that beautiful mess. It's not just a trip down memory lane—it's a living, breathing artifact of a year that changed everything.

Perfect for anyone who loves pop culture, nostalgia, or music history, this is one of the most fun Movie of the Year episodes yet.

Subscribe now to follow the rest of the 1999 season and never miss a beat.

Movie of the Year: 1999 Mixtape – streaming now on all podcast platforms.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The Green MileWhy The Green Mile Still Strikes a ChordOn this episode of the Movie of the Year podcast, the Taste Buds step into the hauntingly spiritual world of The Green Mile, Frank Darabont’s sweeping 1999 adaptation of the Stephen King novel. Blending magical realism with deeply human storytelling, The Green Mile tackles justice, pain, and the inexplicable mysteries of life—and the panel is here to unpack it all.

As they revisit this emotional powerhouse, the Taste Buds examine the film’s artistry, cultural context, and why it continues to resonate with audiences decades later. Whether listeners are longtime fans or curious newcomers, this discussion sheds light on the film’s enduring significance.

Darabont and King: Adapting The Green MileFew director-author pairings have produced such emotionally resonant work as Frank Darabont and Stephen King. After the success of The Shawshank Redemption, Darabont returned to King’s work with The Green Mile, crafting another prison-set epic—but this time with a supernatural twist.

The Taste Buds explore how Darabont translates King’s sprawling narrative into a cohesive film, balancing intimate performances with grand themes of morality, fate, and grace. The episode also compares both adaptations, highlighting what makes The Green Mile uniquely powerful.

Related Links:* Stephen King’s Official Site * IMDb: The Green Mile

Coffey and Race: A Complicated Legacy in The Green MileJohn Coffey (Michael Clarke Duncan) is one of the most memorable characters in 1990s cinema, but also one of its most debated. This episode takes a close look at the racial dynamics of the film, unpacking the “magical Negro” trope and its implications.

The panel wrestles with the emotional potency of Coffey’s story, the film’s approach to race and injustice, and how it reflects the myth-making tendencies of Hollywood storytelling, especially when viewed through a modern lens.

The Power of Love in The Green MileAt its core, The Green Mile is a film about love. Not romantic love, but love expressed through compassion, understanding, and humanity. The Taste Buds reflect on the different relationships in the film—Paul Edgecomb’s (Tom Hanks) empathy for Coffey, the bonds between the prison guards, and even Coffey’s tenderness toward the mouse, Mr. Jingles.

The discussion highlights how the film uses moments of grace to balance its darker themes and why The Green Mile remains a tearjerker that earns every emotional beat.

Bonus Segment: Being John MalkovichAs a special treat for listeners, the episode includes a bonus segment where the Taste Buds dive into another 1999 classic: Being John Malkovich. They explore the film’s surreal originality, its commentary on identity and celebrity, and how it stands as one of the boldest cinematic experiments of the year. It’s a wild ride that perfectly complements the emotional gravity of The Green Mile.

Guest Panelist Spotlight: Erik from Cradle 2 the GraveJoining the Taste Buds for this episode is special guest Erik, host of the Cradle 2 the Grave podcast. With his signature insight and deep love for ‘90s cinema, Erik brings fresh perspectives to the discussion, particularly on the cultural legacy of The Green Mile. His dynamic presence adds a new flavor to the panel as they dig deep into themes of justice, faith, and film craft.

Check out Cradle 2 the Grave here!

And follow the pod on Instagram @cradle2thegravepod

More to Listen To!For more Tom Hanks, check out the Taste Buds discussing Catch Me if You Can

For more Bonnie Hunt, listen to the Jerry Maguire episode!

And check out the Taste Buds talking about James Cromwell as Charles Keating in the People vs Larry Flynt episode!

The Green Mile Still Walks TallEven twenty-five years later, The Green Mile continues to move audiences with its blend of emotional storytelling, moral questions, and standout performances. This episode of Movie of the Year goes beyond the tears to explore why Frank Darabont’s vision still endures.

Whether revisiting the film or watching for the first time, The Green Mile remains a stirring journey worth taking—and the Taste Buds are here to guide listeners down it.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999ElectionWhy Election Still Wins in 2025Election (1999), directed by Alexander Payne, is more than a high school satire—it's a prescient political commentary that resonates even more strongly today. In this episode of the Movie of the Year podcast, our panel dissects the themes, characters, and real-world connections that make the 1999 film Election a lasting cultural touchstone. Whether you're a cinephile, a political junkie, or just love smart storytelling, this episode is for you.

Tracy Flick: Ambition MisunderstoodReese Witherspoon's portrayal of Tracy Flick has become iconic—a name synonymous with hyper-ambition. But is she the villain the culture made her out to be? Our hosts dig into Tracy's motivations, the pressures she faces, and why she remains such a lightning rod in discussions about women in power. We also explore how Tracy has been unfairly weaponized in political commentary and what her character says about gender dynamics in leadership.

Related Link:* Tracy Flick and the Misogyny of Ambition – The Atlantic

Multiple Narrators: A Study in SubjectivityOne of Election's standout narrative techniques is its use of multiple unreliable narrators. The podcast explores how shifting points of view from characters like Jim McAllister (Matthew Broderick) and Tracy Flick enhance the story's depth. By hearing each character's internal monologue, viewers are invited to question their judgments and reconsider the "truth" behind every action.

This layered storytelling approach reflects the film's central themes of bias, self-deception, and moral relativism—perfect fodder for a podcast discussion.

The Real-Life Politics of ElectionAt its core, Election is a biting political allegory. Our panel draws parallels between the film's student election and the real-world electoral process, both in 1999 and today. We discuss how the film anticipates the rise of personality-driven campaigns, performative outrage, and the weaponization of narrative control.

From Clinton-era scandals to 21st-century political polarization, Election serves as a surprisingly accurate mirror of American democracy. We also examine the cultural aftershocks of Tracy Flick's character, who continues to be cited in political discourse more than two decades later.

External Resources: IMDb: Election (1999) * Roger Ebert’s Review of Election*

Revisiting the 1999 Season: American Beauty in the SpotlightAs part of their ongoing mission to revisit the films of their first 1999 season, The Taste Buds also take a fresh look at American Beauty in this episode. They reflect on how the film has aged, explore its themes in the context of today's culture, and consider how its reputation has evolved. This bonus discussion offers added value for long-time listeners and new fans exploring the best films of 1999 through a modern lens.

Final Thoughts: Election Still Gets Our VoteMore than two decades after its release, Election remains eerily relevant and endlessly entertaining. Through nuanced performances, clever storytelling, and bold satire, Alexander Payne crafted a film that continues to spark debate. This episode of Movie of the Year unpacks all that and more, providing listeners with a thoughtful and engaging breakdown of why Election deserves a spot among the best films of 1999.

Call to ActionWhat’s your take on Tracy Flick—ambitious leader or power-hungry manipulator? Share your thoughts in the comments and don’t forget to subscribe to the podcast for more episodes like this.

Related EpisodesReady to revisit the twisted halls of Carver High? Stream the episode now and relive the chaos, comedy, and uncomfortable truths of Election .

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1999The Movies Are Chosen!64 Movies Enter, Only 16 Survive—Which 1999 Classics Make the Cut?

1999 was a landmark year in film history, and the Movie of the Year podcast is here to determine the greatest movie of 1999. In this second part of our 1999 intro, the Taste Buds continue their tournament-style bracket to narrow 64 iconic films down to a powerful Sweet 16. If you're a fan of The Matrix, Fight Club, The Sixth Sense, or The Blair Witch Project, you won’t want to miss what survives—and what doesn’t.

Missed Part I? Listen to the 1999 Intro, Part I to hear how we cut 96 movies down to 64.

What Happens in This Episode

Using a mix of cultural impact, critical acclaim, personal bias, and how much a film’s reputation has grown over time, the hosts battle through each matchup in a chaotic and often hilarious 64-seed bracket. There are no guests this time—just the regular crew unleashing their strongest takes and wildest arguments.

Expect passionate defenses (Ryan refuses to let The Limey go quietly), surprise eliminations (can The Mummy survive the critics?), and more than one heated debate over what makes a movie "worthy" of lasting recognition. With unpredictable outcomes and sharp opinions, this is a high-energy episode full of movie love, bracket strategy, and very little agreement.

What’s at Stake

By the end of this episode, only 16 films will remain in the race to be crowned the best movie of 1999. The choices only get harder from here as we move closer to naming our official Movie of the Year.

TL;DR

The Movie of the Year podcast cuts the 64 best films of 1999 down to a Sweet 16 in this intense, bracket-style elimination episode. Laughs, hot takes, and heartbreak guaranteed.

Support the Show

If you love movies from 1999 or just enjoy strong opinions and smart comedy, subscribe to the podcast and leave a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Sharing the episode also helps us grow and keeps the bracket battles coming.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 19991999 Returns!96 Movies Enter, 16 Will SurviveThe Year Was 1999. Everyone Had a Discman. And Movies? Absolute Bangers.Back when the Taste Buds first covered the films of 1999 on Movie of the Year, they were young, naïve, and only picked eight movies. Eight! That’s adorable.

Now they're older, wiser, and full of regret—so they're returning to give one of the greatest years in movie history the full 16-slot bracket it deserves. That means eight more movies, a new perspective, and a much deeper dive.

This premiere episode is where it all begins: they take 96 of the most iconic, beloved, and deeply weird movies of 1999, and start hacking our way down to the Sweet 16. Expect heartbreak. Expect joy. Expect someone to irrationally defend The Haunting like their life depends on it.

In This Episode: The full list of 96 movies*—from cult classics to forgotten flops * Nostalgic tangents about Y2K, dial-up, and Taco Bell commercials * Heated debates about what counts as “Movie of the Year–worthy” * Emotional breakdowns over the ones we had to cut * The 16 movies that will define the season—revealed

Why 1999?Because it gave us The Matrix, Fight Club, The Blair Witch Project, Being John Malkovich, 10 Things I Hate About You, and like 30 more that would be any other year’s #1. It was the year movies peaked, and we’re finally giving it the coverage it deserves—with twice the movies and at least three times the yelling.

Tell Us We’re Wrong:You definitely have opinions. Good.

Hit us up on Instagram @yourpopfilter, or email us at popfilterco@gmail and let us know which movies should have made the cut, which ones absolutely shouldn’t have, and how mad you are that we even considered Inspector Gadget.

Don’t Miss a Single Episode:Make sure you subscribe, rate, and review wherever you get your podcasts. That way, you’ll be there for the whole ride—from 96 to the Final Four, all the way to the 1999 Movie of the Year.

This one’s gonna be a journey. A journey to find the single greatest movie out of all of the films of 1999.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996The Finale, Part IIIThis is it! The guests have gone home, the movies have been discussed, and it's time to finally pick the film that will be known forever as the 1996 Movie of the Year! In the ACTUAL season finale, the Taste Buds whittle down the Elite 8 to the one movie that will forever be known as MOVIE OF THE YEAR!

THE BIRDCAGE - BREAKING THE WAVES - THE CABLE GUY - FARGO - GHOST IN THE SHELL - THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME - INDEPENDENCE DAY - JERRY MAGUIRE - LA HAINE - MARS ATTACKS - MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - THE PEOPLE VS LARRY FLYNT - SCREAM - SWINGERS - THAT THING YOU DO - TRAINSPOTTINGWhat will be the single best film from all of the movies of 1996?

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996The Finale, Part IIThis is it! The guests have gone home, the movies have been discussed, and it's time to finally pick the film that will be known forever as the 1996 Movie of the Year! Join the Taste Buds as they take the bracket from 16 to 1, while also handing out a dozen Mooties, the most important award in show business!

THE BIRDCAGE - BREAKING THE WAVES - THE CABLE GUY - FARGO - GHOST IN THE SHELL - THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME - INDEPENDENCE DAY - JERRY MAGUIRE - LA HAINE - MARS ATTACKS - MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - THE PEOPLE VS LARRY FLYNT - SCREAM - SWINGERS - THAT THING YOU DO - TRAINSPOTTINGWhat will be the single best film from all of the movies of 1996?

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996The Finale, Part IThis is it! The guests have gone home, the movies have been discussed, and it's time to finally pick the film that will be known forever as the 1996 Movie of the Year! Join the Taste Buds as they take the bracket from 16 to 1, while also handing out a dozen Mooties, the most important award in show business!

THE BIRDCAGE - BREAKING THE WAVES - THE CABLE GUY - FARGO - GHOST IN THE SHELL - THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME - INDEPENDENCE DAY - JERRY MAGUIRE - LA HAINE - MARS ATTACKS - MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - THE PEOPLE VS LARRY FLYNT - SCREAM - SWINGERS - THAT THING YOU DO - TRAINSPOTTINGWhat will be the single best film from all of the movies of 1996?

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996Independence DayMovie of the Year is the podcast that dares to ask: What is the best movie of any given year? In this episode, we turn our telescopes to the stars and our speakers to eleven as we revisit the 1996 cinematic spectacle, Independence Day. Packed with aliens, explosions, and patriotic fervor, this sci-fi blockbuster defined summer movies for a generation. But does it hold up today?

Join the panel as we explore the legacy of Independence Day, its place in the science fiction genre, its portrayal of American values, and how it frames masculinity in the 1990s.

Independence Day as 90s Science FictionIs Independence Day just a popcorn flick, or does it deserve a spot among sci-fi classics? The hosts unpack the movie's use of classic alien invasion tropes, its reliance on 90s tech optimism, and the impact of its genre-blending tone.

From Area 51 to cable viruses, Independence Day reflects a distinctly 90s approach to science fiction—where spectacle meets paranoia, and where heroes can be hackers, pilots, or presidents.

America and Independence Day: Patriotism on the Big ScreenFew films wear their nationalism on their sleeve quite like Independence Day. In this section, the Taste Buds explore how the movie functions as a patriotic narrative, complete with presidential speeches, flags in the rubble, and international unity under American leadership.

They also compare Independence Day to other patriotic blockbusters of the era, questioning whether its celebration of American ideals is sincere, ironic, or somewhere in between.

If you're interested in similar themes, check out our Mars Attacks! episode for a different take on 1996's alien obsession.

Masculinity in Independence Day: Fathers, Fighters, and FlyboysWhat does it mean to be a man in Independence Day? The film features a wide array of male archetypes—from the stoic President Whitmore to the wisecracking Captain Hiller and the redemption-seeking Russell Casse.

We break down the film's representation of masculinity in the context of 1990s culture, focusing on themes like emotional repression, heroism, sacrifice, and fatherhood.

These depictions reflect both the expectations and anxieties of American men in the late 20th century, and the movie's lasting popularity suggests they still resonate today.

Final Verdict: Is This the Movie of the Year?There's no denying Independence Day was the biggest movie of 1996. But is it the best? The hosts evaluate the film’s legacy, critical reception, and cultural footprint. How does it compare to fellow 1996 heavyweights like Fargo, Trainspotting, or Scream?

By the end of the episode, we’ll know if Independence Day still deserves a place at the top—or if it's simply a nostalgic relic of the blockbuster boom.

WANT TO HEAR MORE?

For more 1996 alien attacks, listen to our Mars Attacks episode!

For more Will Smith kicking butt, check out our episode on Bad Boys 4 Life!

For more goofy Jeff Goldblum trying to save the world, download our Nashville episode!

Thanks for listening to Movie of the Year—where every film fights for its legacy.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996The Birdcage (feat. Andrea Thompson from A Reel Of One's Own!)The Movie of the Year podcast takes a deep dive into The Birdcage (1996), a groundbreaking comedy that blends family dynamics, farce, and fearless LGBTQ+ representation. In this episode, the hosts explore how The Birdcage helped shift mainstream perceptions of queerness in the '90s, all while delivering standout performances from Robin Williams, Nathan Lane, and showcasing the directorial mastery of Mike Nichols. Whether you're watching the film for the first time or revisiting it, this episode offers a thoughtful and engaging look at why The Birdcage continues to matter.

Listen to the episode now:

[Podcast Player Embed Here]

Gender, Sexuality, and Queer Representation in The BirdcageThe podcast opens with an in-depth discussion of how The Birdcage portrays gender and sexuality with both humor and dignity. At a time when LGBTQ+ characters were often relegated to the margins of pop culture, The Birdcage celebrated queer life, drag culture, and same-sex relationships. The hosts explore the film’s role in pushing boundaries and normalizing visibility, particularly in a cultural moment still defined by Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and lingering AIDS-era stigma.

Robin Williams in One of His Most Subtle, Heartfelt RolesKnown for his exuberant performances, Robin Williams delivers one of his most emotionally restrained roles as Armand Goldman. The podcast explores how Williams balances warmth, wit, and gravitas, crafting a character who is both deeply human and quietly revolutionary. The hosts compare this performance to Williams’ other work from the '90s and consider how his presence lends the film emotional credibility and depth.

Mike Nichols’ Directing BrillianceDirector Mike Nichols adapts the French farce La Cage aux Folles into a uniquely American satire, using timing, character dynamics, and visual composition to heighten both comedy and emotional impact. The hosts break down Nichols’ directing choices, from rapid-fire dialogue to carefully choreographed scenes, showing how his vision shapes the film’s tone and political commentary.

Is The Birdcage Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts?One of the most spirited conversations in the episode centers on whether The Birdcage works because of its individual elements—such as the writing, performances, and production design—or because those elements merge into something greater. The hosts highlight iconic scenes like the chaotic dinner party and the nightclub sequences to show how the film achieves synergy between script, performance, and direction.

Identity and the Meaning of LifeBeyond its sharp humor, The Birdcage asks deep questions about identity, authenticity, and acceptance. The hosts analyze the tension between performance and reality, especially in the context of Armand and Val’s relationship, and explore how characters navigate the pressures of conformity and family expectations. This section connects the film to broader philosophical ideas about the meaning of life, love, and self-expression.

Special Guest: Andrea Thompson from A Reel Of Our OwnJoining the discussion is film critic Andrea Thompson, founder of A Reel Of Our Own, a platform dedicated to amplifying marginalized voices in film. Andrea brings a fresh critical perspective to the episode, exploring how The Birdcage portrays queer identity with compassion, nuance, and humor. She also discusses the film’s lasting influence on LGBTQ+ media and its place in queer film history.

How The Birdcage Holds Up in 2024The podcast team revisits The Birdcage in the context of modern media, asking how it compares to today’s LGBTQ+ representation in shows like Pose, Heartstopper, and Schitt’s Creek. They consider whether the film’s humor and themes still resonate, and how evolving cultural attitudes around gender, sexuality, and drag performance affect its legacy in 2024.

Final Thoughts: Why The Birdcage Still MattersIn their closing thoughts, the hosts reflect on The Birdcage as a comedy that’s more than just funny. With a tight script, sincere performances, and sharp direction, the film remains a vital piece of LGBTQ+ cinema and a smart, heartfelt portrait of family and identity. For longtime fans and new viewers alike, The Birdcage offers both laughter and insight, proving its relevance decades after its release.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996Ghost in the ShellBreaking Down Ghost in the Shell (1995) on the Movie of the Year Podcast

The Movie of the Year podcast delves into Ghost in the Shell (1995), the legendary cyberpunk anime that arrived in the U.S. in 1996. As part of their ongoing quest to determine the greatest movie of the year, the hosts analyze whether Ghost in the Shell is more than the sum of its parts, how it explores the concept of identity, and what it has to say about the meaning of life. With its groundbreaking animation, philosophical depth, and lasting influence on sci-fi cinema, Ghost in the Shell remains a must-watch for movie fans and anime lovers alike.

Ghost in the Shell: A Sci-Fi Masterpiece or a Beautiful Puzzle?Director Mamoru Oshii’s Ghost in the Shell is visually breathtaking and thematically rich, but does it all come together into a perfect film? The Movie of the Year hosts debate whether the film's dreamlike pacing and philosophical musings enhance the storytelling or make it more like a collection of striking moments rather than a cohesive narrative. They also compare it to other cyberpunk classics like Blade Runner and The Matrix, both of which owe a significant debt to this anime landmark.

Identity and the Cyborg QuestionAt the heart of Ghost in the Shell is Major Motoko Kusanagi, one of the most compelling protagonists in anime history. But is she even a person? The film explores the tension between human consciousness and artificial bodies, raising questions about selfhood in a world where memories can be manipulated and bodies are replaceable. The hosts discuss how these themes resonate in modern conversations about AI, transhumanism, and digital identity.

What Does Ghost in the Shell Say About the Meaning of Life?Beyond its thrilling action and cyberpunk aesthetics, Ghost in the Shell delves into existential questions about life, evolution, and free will. The Movie of the Year panel examines the philosophy of the Puppet Master and its perspective on human consciousness. Is true existence defined by a biological body, or can intelligence alone constitute life? The hosts debate whether Ghost in the Shell provides answers or leaves audiences lost in existential uncertainty.

The Lasting Impact of Ghost in the ShellSince its release, Ghost in the Shell has influenced an entire generation of filmmakers, from the Wachowskis (The Matrix) to Denis Villeneuve (Blade Runner 2049). Its mix of action, cyberpunk world-building, and deep philosophical themes continues to shape anime, sci-fi, and pop culture. The hosts discuss how the film’s legacy is tied to both its stunning visuals and its intellectual ambition, ensuring its place as one of the most important anime films ever made.

Final Thoughts: Why GITS Still MattersThe podcast concludes with a discussion on why Ghost in the Shell remains essential viewing. Whether you're a longtime fan or experiencing it for the first time, this episode of Movie of the Year offers an insightful, thought-provoking conversation about one of sci-fi’s most enduring films.

Love cyberpunk films? Subscribe to Movie of the Year for more deep dives into the best movies of all time!

Further Exploration Watch GITS on Crunchyroll * Read more about cyberpunk film influences on Rotten Tomatoes and IMDb * Listen to more Movie of the Year episodes on sci-fi classics, including * Blade Runner * Akira * and Minority Report!***

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996Fargo (feat. iFanboy's Josh Flanagan)Is Fargo (1996) Really a True Story? This week on Movie of the Year, our panel of film obsessives takes a deep dive into the Coen Brothers’ legendary crime thriller, Fargo (1996). From its bleak, snow-covered landscapes to its uniquely offbeat characters, Fargo is a film that has stood the test of time. But does it have what it takes to be crowned the best movie of the year? Tune in as we dissect this darkly comedic masterpiece.

The Genre of Fargo (1996): Crime, Comedy, or Both?One of Fargo (1996)'s greatest strengths is its ability to seamlessly blend genres. Is it a crime thriller? A dark comedy? A neo-noir? The film walks the tightrope between tension and absurdity, crafting a world where violent criminals, desperate schemes, and Minnesota Nice collide in unforgettable ways. Our hosts explore how Fargo defies genre conventions and why this unique blend makes it such a compelling film.

For more discussions on genre-bending movies, check out our deep dive into The Big Lebowski or No Country for Old Men.

The Setting of Fargo (1996): More Than Just SnowFargo (1996) isn’t just a movie—it’s an immersive experience of the American Midwest. Despite its title, most of the film unfolds in Minnesota, capturing the distinct speech patterns, mannerisms, and cold, barren beauty of the region. We discuss how the Coen Brothers use the setting as a character itself, influencing the tone, the story, and even the humor. Would Fargo be the same film without its chilling, small-town backdrop? We break it all down.

For more insights on film settings, read our analysis of There Will Be Blood.

Is Fargo (1996) a True Story? The Real vs. the FictionalFrom the opening title card claiming “This is a true story,” Fargo has left audiences debating its origins for nearly three decades. Is Fargo (1996) really based on actual events? Or was that just another Coen Brothers trick to pull us deeper into their world of deception? We uncover the truth behind the film’s inspiration and discuss how its true crime aesthetic enhances its mystique.

Want to learn more about real vs. fictionalized crime films? Check out our episode on Zodiac.

Special Guest: Josh Flanagan from iFanboyJoining us this week is none other than Josh Flanagan from iFanboy! As a longtime film and comic book expert, Josh brings his signature wit and insight to the discussion. He shares his personal experience watching Fargo (1996) for the first time, his thoughts on the Coen Brothers’ unique storytelling, and how Fargo fits into the larger landscape of 1996 cinema.

For more of Josh’s takes on film and pop culture, visit iFanboy.

Does Fargo (1996) Deserve to Win Movie of the Year?After breaking down the film’s genre-bending brilliance, its unforgettable setting, and the enduring mystery of its “true story” origins, we finally ask the big question: Does Fargo (1996) deserve the title of Movie of the Year? Listen in as we debate its legacy, compare it to other contenders from 1996, and ultimately decide whether Marge Gunderson’s world of crime and comedy is worthy of the top spot.

Subscribe now and join us for this deep-dive into Fargo (1996), a film that remains just as sharp, chilling, and darkly hilarious as it was in 1996.

Recommended Further Reading:* IMDB - Fargo (1996) * Rotten Tomatoes - Fargo (1996) Reviews * Coen Brothers Interview on Fargo

Don’tcha know you don’t wanna miss it?

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996That Thing You Do (feat. contest winner Matthew Dewey!)Exploring That Thing You Do! – The Ultimate Feel-Good Rock and Roll Movie

On this episode of Movie of the Year, we dive deep into That Thing You Do!, the 1996 rock and roll movie that perfectly captures the meteoric rise of a one-hit-wonder. Directed by Tom Hanks, this film combines infectious energy, a toe-tapping original soundtrack, and an affectionate tribute to the music industry of the 1960s. Whether you’re a fan of classic rock, catchy pop hits, or uplifting stories about bands making it big, this episode is a must-listen.

That Thing You Do! – A Rock and Roll Movie with Unforgettable Original Music

Few films capture the spirit of an era as effortlessly as TTYD! does with its incredible original music. We break down how the title track, written by Adam Schlesinger, became a real-world hit, perfectly channeling the British Invasion-inspired sound that defined the 1960s. This episode examines the songwriting, standout performances, and how The Wonders (or the “Oneders”) created a fictional song that still resonates decades later.

Why That Thing You Do! is the Ultimate Boomer Nostalgia Trip

Beyond being a fantastic rock and roll movie, TTYD!is also a prime example of what we call “boomer porn.” The film paints an idealized version of 1960s rock history, celebrating a time when bands could skyrocket to fame on sheer talent, drive, and a little bit of luck. We discuss how the movie plays into baby boomer nostalgia, romanticizing an era that felt innocent, exciting, and full of musical possibilities. Does it succeed in capturing the magic, or does it lean too heavily into nostalgia?

How That Thing You Do! Still Rocks the Movie World Today

Decades later, TTYD! remains one of the most endearing rock and roll movies ever made. We discuss its lasting impact, from the performances of Tom Everett Scott, Liv Tyler, and Steve Zahn to the way it continues to resonate with new generations of movie lovers and music fans. Plus, we debate where it stands among the greatest music movies of all time.

Tune In to the Movie of the Year Podcast for the Full That Thing You Do! Breakdown

Join us for this nostalgic, music-filled ride as we celebrate TTYD! and analyze what makes it a timeless rock and roll movie. If you love deep dives into classic films, this is one episode you won’t want to miss. Listen now to Movie of the Year and relive the magic of TTYD!—you’ll be clapping along in no time!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996Jerry Maguire (feat. Melinda Clarke and CG Mirich!)Breaking Down Jerry Maguire on the Movie of the Year Podcast

The Movie of the Year podcast takes a deep dive into Jerry Maguire (1996), a film that blends sports, romance, and sharp critiques of capitalism into a compelling character study. As part of their exploration of the best movies of 1996, the hosts analyze what makes Jerry Maguire an enduring classic, how it functions as a romantic comedy, and the way it critiques corporate culture. Movie fans and podcast listeners alike will enjoy this lively discussion that revisits one of Tom Cruise’s most iconic roles.

Special Guests: Melinda Clarke and CG MirichThis episode of Movie of the Year features special guests Melinda Clarke and CG Mirich, who bring fresh perspectives to the discussion. Clarke, known for her work in television and film, offers insight into the industry’s portrayal of romance and career struggles, while Mirich provides a deep dive into the film’s thematic relevance today. Their contributions add depth to the conversation, making this episode a must-listen for Jerry Maguire fans and film enthusiasts alike.

Jerry Maguire: A Lasting Cultural LandmarkThe episode begins by exploring Jerry Maguire's legacy in pop culture. The film, directed by Cameron Crowe, remains one of the most quotable movies of the '90s, thanks to lines like “Show me the money!” and “You complete me.” The podcast hosts discuss how these catchphrases took on a life of their own, transcending the film and becoming embedded in everyday conversations. They also examine Tom Cruise’s performance, arguing that it represents a perfect blend of his charm, intensity, and comedic timing, solidifying Jerry Maguire as one of his defining roles. Additionally, they explore how the film’s impact on pop culture extends to sports, relationships, and even business philosophy.

Jerry Maguire as a Romantic ComedyWhile Jerry Maguire is often categorized as a sports drama, the hosts argue that it functions just as effectively as a romantic comedy. The podcast breaks down the chemistry between Cruise’s Jerry and Renée Zellweger’s Dorothy Boyd, highlighting how their relationship evolves throughout the film. The discussion touches on the film’s heartfelt moments, its unconventional approach to romance, and how it both embraces and subverts rom-com tropes. The panel debates whether Jerry Maguire delivers a satisfying romantic arc or if its sports and business themes overshadow the love story. The hosts also compare the film to other romantic comedies of the 1990s to determine its place within the genre.

Capitalism and Morality in Jerry MaguireAnother major theme explored in the podcast episode is Jerry Maguire’s critique of capitalism. The film follows Jerry’s moral awakening after he writes a mission statement advocating for personal relationships over profits—only to be fired by his corporate sports agency. The hosts analyze how the film presents the tension between personal integrity and financial success. They also discuss Cuba Gooding Jr.'s portrayal of Rod Tidwell, a character who fully embraces the system while also demanding personal respect, adding layers to the film’s message about money, loyalty, and self-worth. Additionally, they explore how Jerry Maguire compares to other films that critique capitalism, such as Wall Street or The Wolf of Wall Street.

How Jerry Maguire Holds Up in Modern CinemaThe Movie of the Year hosts reflect on whether Jerry Maguire stands the test of time. They consider how its themes of personal reinvention, ambition, and emotional growth remain relevant today. The discussion also examines how the film’s portrayal of relationships and workplace ethics resonates with modern audiences. The hosts discuss whether Jerry Maguire would be received differently if released today and how changing cultural attitudes toward business and romance might affect its legacy.

Final Thoughts: Why Jerry Maguire Still MattersThe podcast episode concludes with a discussion on Jerry Maguire’s lasting appeal. The hosts analyze how the film’s blend of romance, sports drama, and personal transformation creates an enduring cinematic experience. They also highlight its impact on the careers of Tom Cruise, Renée Zellweger, and Cameron Crowe. Listeners will walk away with a deeper appreciation for Jerry Maguire and its place in the pantheon of great ’90s cinema.

Whether you’re a longtime fan of Jerry Maguire or revisiting it for the first time, this Movie of the Year episode provides an insightful, entertaining, and thought-provoking discussion. Tune in to hear the hosts debate, analyze, and celebrate this unforgettable 1996 classic.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2024Film of the Year, Part IIWhat was the best film of 2024? In this episode of Movie of the Year, the panel dives deep into the year's greatest films, debating and ranking them to determine the ultimate film of the year. With so many outstanding contenders—from powerful dramas to groundbreaking sci-fi epics—the competition is fierce. Join the discussion as the hosts break down the most critically acclaimed movies, the biggest trends shaping the industry, and the thrilling bracket that decides which film takes the top spot.

Who is Competing to be the 2024 Film of the YearThis year saw an impressive mix of Oscar-worthy films, bold indie hits, and major blockbusters that exceeded expectations. Some of the most talked-about movies of 2024 include:

ALL WE IMAGINE AS LIGHT - ANORA - CHALLENGERS - CONCLAVE - I SAW THE TV GLOW - LA CHIMERA - MY OLD ASS - NICKEL BOYS - NOSFERATU - THE PEOPLE'S JOKER - THE SUBSTANCE and many more!

With such a strong lineup, the film of the year debate is more intense than ever.

Trends That Defined 2024 CinemaBeyond individual films, 2024 introduced fascinating trends that shaped the movie industry:

• AI-Enhanced Filmmaking – More films integrated AI in storytelling, VFX, and even dialogue generation.
• The Resurgence of Mid-Budget Films – Audiences embraced character-driven dramas and comedies, proving that spectacle isn’t everything.
• The Streaming vs. Theatrical Battle Continues – Some films found unexpected success in cinemas, while others thrived on streaming platforms.
• Practical Effects Making a Comeback – A growing number of filmmakers prioritized real-world stunts and practical effects over CGI.

Each of these trends influenced which movies stood out in the film of the year race.

The Ultimate Movie Showdown: Who Wins the Film of the Year?At the heart of this episode is the Movie of the Year bracket, where the panel fiercely debates, defends, and eliminates films until only one remains. Expect:

✅ Heated arguments over which movies deserve to advance

✅ Shocking upsets as favorites fall early

✅ Passionate defenses of underrated gems

✅ A final showdown between two powerhouse films

With humor, expert insight, and plenty of unexpected twists, the road to crowning the 2024 film of the year is a battle for the ages.

What’s Your Pick for the Film of the Year?Do you agree with our choice? Comment below and let us know your pick for the best movie of 2024! And don’t forget to subscribe to Movie of the Year for more deep dives into the greatest films of every era.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2024Film of the YearWhat was the best film of 2024? In this episode of Movie of the Year, the panel dives deep into the year's greatest films, debating and ranking them to determine the ultimate film of the year. With so many outstanding contenders—from powerful dramas to groundbreaking sci-fi epics—the competition is fierce. Join the discussion as the hosts break down the most critically acclaimed movies, the biggest trends shaping the industry, and the thrilling bracket that decides which film takes the top spot.

Who is Competing to be the 2024 Film of the YearThis year saw an impressive mix of Oscar-worthy films, bold indie hits, and major blockbusters that exceeded expectations. Some of the most talked-about movies of 2024 include:

ALL WE IMAGINE AS LIGHT - ANORA - CHALLENGERS - CONCLAVE - I SAW THE TV GLOW - LA CHIMERA - MY OLD ASS - NICKEL BOYS - NOSFERATU - THE PEOPLE'S JOKER - THE SUBSTANCE and many more!

With such a strong lineup, the film of the year debate is more intense than ever.

Trends That Defined 2024 CinemaBeyond individual films, 2024 introduced fascinating trends that shaped the movie industry:

• AI-Enhanced Filmmaking – More films integrated AI in storytelling, VFX, and even dialogue generation.
• The Resurgence of Mid-Budget Films – Audiences embraced character-driven dramas and comedies, proving that spectacle isn’t everything.
• The Streaming vs. Theatrical Battle Continues – Some films found unexpected success in cinemas, while others thrived on streaming platforms.
• Practical Effects Making a Comeback – A growing number of filmmakers prioritized real-world stunts and practical effects over CGI.

Each of these trends influenced which movies stood out in the film of the year race.

The Ultimate Movie Showdown: Who Wins the Film of the Year?At the heart of this episode is the Movie of the Year bracket, where the panel fiercely debates, defends, and eliminates films until only one remains. Expect:

✅ Heated arguments over which movies deserve to advance

✅ Shocking upsets as favorites fall early

✅ Passionate defenses of underrated gems

✅ A final showdown between two powerhouse films

With humor, expert insight, and plenty of unexpected twists, the road to crowning the 2024 film of the year is a battle for the ages.

What’s Your Pick for the Film of the Year?Do you agree with our choice? Comment below and let us know your pick for the best movie of 2024! And don’t forget to subscribe to Movie of the Year for more deep dives into the greatest films of every era.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2024Drama Series of the YearThe Ultimate 2024 Drama Series Bracket!In this episode of Movie of the Year, the hosts take on their most ambitious challenge yet: determining the best 2024 drama series. Sixteen of the year’s most important series—across drama, comedy, and everything in between—compete in an epic bracket showdown. From critically acclaimed hits to pop culture sensations, the panel debates, argues, and laughs their way through tough matchups. With only one show emerging as the ultimate champion, which series will claim the title of Best TV Show of 2024? Tune in to find out!

The Best TV Drama Series of 20242024 was an incredible year for TV drama, delivering both fresh perspectives and powerful storytelling. Here are some of the top drama series of 2024 that left a lasting impact:

• House of the Dragon (Season 2) – Proved that Westeros still reigns supreme with more fire and blood.
• The Sympathizer – An intricate historical drama that captivated viewers with its espionage and political intrigue.
• Shōgun – A stunning adaptation of James Clavell’s novel that brought feudal Japan to life.
• True Detective: Night Country – A chilling reinvention of the crime anthology series with a gripping new mystery.

With so many standout dramas, 2024 was a year of must-watch TV shows that captivated audiences worldwide.

The Biggest Events in Television This YearThis year saw major shake-ups in the TV industry, from surprising cancellations to landmark finales:

• Streaming Wars Intensify – Netflix, Max, and Disney+ battled for dominance, while Apple TV+ continued to gain prestige.
• Emmys Delayed but Celebrated – The awards ceremony, postponed due to industry strikes, finally honored last season’s best shows.
• Final Farewells – Legacy series like Girls5Eva concluded with explosive finales, marking the end of an era.
• Mass Cancellations – Industry-wide cost-cutting led to several show cancellations, frustrating fans who lost beloved series.

Major Trends in 2024 TV Drama SeriesA few key TV trends in 2024 shaped the year’s most compelling dramas:

• Book Adaptations Dominate – Shows like Shōgun, The Sympathizer, and Three-Body Problem proved that literary properties still rule prestige TV.
• Return of Episodic Storytelling – Networks experimented with weekly releases, bringing back the anticipation of traditional TV.
• Genre Fusion – Sci-fi, horror, and historical drama blended unexpectedly, creating unique storytelling experiences.
• Rise of AI in Production – AI and deepfake technology began creeping into TV production, sparking innovation and ethical debates.

Listen & Join the ConversationWhich TV show will be crowned the best of 2024? Listen to Movie of the Year and find out! Join the discussion by commenting below or voting for your favorite show. Don’t forget to share this article with fellow TV lovers and tag us on social media using #BestTV2024 #TVBracket #MovieOfTheYearPodcast!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2024Album of the YearWhy the 2024 Album of the Year MattersWelcome to the Movie of the Year podcast, where we explore the most impactful cultural moments in entertainment. In this episode, we dive deep into the 2024 Album of the Year, highlighting the biggest artists, defining music trends, and the controversies that shaped the industry. Whether you're a longtime music fan or just catching up on the latest hits, this discussion will give you an inside look at the music that defined 2024.

Major Artists Behind the 2024 Album of the YearThe 2024 Album of the Year featured some of the biggest names in the industry. Taylor Swift continued her reign with another chart-topping release, while Beyoncé pushed boundaries with her innovative sound. Rising stars like Olivia Rodrigo and SZA cemented their places in the industry, delivering emotionally charged albums that resonated with fans worldwide. Meanwhile, veteran artists such as Adele and Kendrick Lamar made triumphant returns, proving that musical excellence knows no age limit.

Key Music Trends in 2024The music industry in 2024 saw an exciting blend of genres and innovations that shaped the year’s sound. Hyperpop and AI-generated music gained significant traction, merging technology with human creativity. Nostalgia played a key role, with influences from the 90s and early 2000s making a comeback, bringing back R&B-infused beats and grunge-inspired aesthetics. Genre-blending also defined the year, with country-rap crossovers, electronic-infused rock, and Latin rhythms dominating the charts. The 2024 Album of the Year contenders reflected these evolving trends, proving that music remains diverse and unpredictable.

Controversies Surrounding the 2024 Album of the YearNo year in music is complete without its share of controversies, and 2024 was no exception. The rise of AI-generated music sparked debates about artistic authenticity and copyright laws. Additionally, high-profile feuds between artists played out on social media, keeping fans engaged in heated discussions. The 2024 Album of the Year nominees weren’t immune to drama, with some facing backlash over cultural appropriation, questionable lyrics, and surprise album leaks. These controversies only added to the intrigue, making the awards season one of the most talked-about in recent history.

Join the Conversation on the 2024 Album of the YearThe 2024 Album of the Year represents more than just great music—it captures the essence of an era. From boundary-pushing artists to evolving trends and headline-making controversies, this year’s music landscape was one for the history books. Please tune in to the Movie of the Year podcast as we break it all down and debate which album truly deserves the top spot.

What do you think was the best album of 2024? Let us know in the comments, and don’t forget to share this episode with fellow music lovers! Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest in entertainment.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2024Comedy Series of the YearThe "Best Comedy Series of 2024" episode of the Movie of the Year podcast takes a deep dive into the funniest and most innovative TV comedies of the year. The hosts break down what made these shows special, analyzing their humor, cultural impact, and overall contribution to the comedy genre. From returning fan favorites to fresh breakout hits, this episode celebrates the year’s best laughs and explores emerging trends in television comedy.

Top Comedy Series of 2024Television in 2024 delivered a variety of exceptional comedy series that kept audiences entertained. Here are some of the standout shows:

• Abbott Elementary – This award-winning sitcom continued to win hearts with its heartfelt humor and sharp social commentary set in an underfunded Philadelphia school.
• Only Murders in the Building – The beloved mystery-comedy hybrid returned with another season packed with suspense, laughs, and unexpected twists.
• Kaos – A fresh take on Greek mythology, this series blended epic storytelling with sharp satire and a modern comedic twist.
• Bad Monkey – This dark comedy follows a disgraced detective navigating a bizarre crime case in Florida, offering a mix of humor and intrigue.
• The Second Best Hospital in the Galaxy – A hilarious sci-fi satire that brought intergalactic healthcare to life with a sharp comedic edge.

Each of these shows stood out for their unique storytelling, character depth, and ability to keep audiences engaged.

Biggest TV Comedy Trends of 2024Comedy television in 2024 embraced fresh storytelling approaches, diverse voices, and innovative genre combinations. Some key trends shaping the landscape included:

• Genre-Blending Comedies – Shows like Kaos and The Second Best Hospital in the Galaxy mixed comedy with fantasy and sci-fi, offering audiences something fresh and unexpected.
• Dark Comedies on the Rise – Bad Monkey and similar series tackled serious themes through a humorous lens, proving that comedy can thrive even in complex narratives.
• Diverse and Inclusive Storytelling – More comedy series highlighted underrepresented voices and cultural perspectives, leading to richer, more authentic humor.
• The Streaming Boom Continues – Streaming services dominated the comedy scene, allowing for bolder, riskier storytelling that traditional networks might not embrace.

Why This Episode is a Must-ListenIf you love great comedy, this Movie of the Year episode is a must-listen. The hosts provide expert analysis, hilarious commentary, and passionate discussions about what made 2024’s comedies shine. Plus, they debate which show deserves the Best Comedy Series of 2024.

Listen now and join the conversation: What was your favorite comedy series of 2024? Comment below!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2024Horror Film of the YearThe Movie of the Year podcast is back with a thrilling deep dive into the best of the 2024 horror films. This episode explores the scariest, most innovative, and genre-defining horror films of the year. With guest panelist Taylor Wilhite from Taylor Talking Taylor, the discussion covers everything from modern horror trends to the eerie and unsettling themes that dominated cinema this year.

Top 2024 Horror FilmsThis year saw an incredible lineup of horror films, each bringing something unique to the table. Some of the standout releases include:

• "Nosferatu" – A gothic horror remake of the 1922 classic, Robert Eggers’ vision brings chilling cinematography and eerie performances that redefine the vampire genre.
• "Oddity" – A mind-bending psychological horror that keeps audiences questioning reality until the very last scene.
• "Cuckoo" – A tense and mysterious thriller featuring a standout performance by Hunter Schafer.
• "Stopmotion" – A disturbing horror film that blends traditional animation techniques with nightmarish storytelling.
• "I Saw the TV Glow" – A surreal horror experience that explores nostalgia, trauma, and the power of media on the mind.
• "Longlegs" – A terrifying serial killer story that has drawn comparisons to The Silence of the Lambs for its deeply unsettling atmosphere.
• "Humanist Vampire Seeking Consenting Suicidal Human" – A darkly comedic horror film with a fresh and unusual take on the vampire mythos.
• "The Substance" – A body horror film that examines society’s obsession with perfection through an intense and grotesque lens.

Adding to this stellar list, "Immaculate" delivers a chilling religious horror experience starring Sydney Sweeney, diving into themes of faith, corruption, and supernatural terror. Meanwhile, "Late Night with the Devil" offers a unique found-footage-style horror story, unfolding in real-time on a 1970s talk show, blending the paranormal with a commentary on media sensationalism.

Trends in 2024 Horror Films2024 has been a year of reinvention for the horror genre, with several key trends emerging:

• The Return of Gothic Horror – With Nosferatu leading the charge, filmmakers have embraced eerie castles, shadowy cinematography, and slow-burning tension to revive the gothic tradition.
• Body Horror Renaissance – Movies like The Substance push boundaries by examining the terror of physical transformation and the dangers of seeking perfection through unnatural means.
• Psychological Horror and Mind-Bending Narratives – Films such as Oddity and I Saw the TV Glow have blurred the lines between reality and delusion, making audiences question their own perceptions.
• Horror-Comedy Fusion – Humanist Vampire Seeking Consenting Suicidal Human demonstrates that horror can be both chilling and darkly humorous, adding new dimensions to the genre.

Guest Panelist: Taylor WilhiteJoining the Movie of the Year panel for this episode is Taylor Wilhite, host of Taylor Talking Taylor, a podcast dedicated to analyzing all things Taylor Swift and pop culture. Wilhite brings a unique perspective to horror discussions, blending his expertise in music and cultural analysis with a fresh take on cinematic horror storytelling. His insights on the emotional resonance of horror films and how they relate to contemporary anxieties add depth to the discussion.

The Movie of the Year podcast continues to highlight the best of cinema, and this horror-themed episode is a must-listen for genre fans. With a mix of psychological terror, gothic revivals, and groundbreaking storytelling, 2024 has proven to be an unforgettable year for horror. Be sure to check out the full episode to hear in-depth discussions and passionate debates about the year’s best scares.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2024Century of the YearIt's the return of the world's most notorious podcast! The rules are simple: the 100 biggest moments of 2024 across 100 minutes. What counts as a bigger deep dive than 100 one-minute conversations? Starring the hosts of Movie of the Year, the Superhero Show Show, and The Unnatural 20's, Century of the Year is a great time for hardcore pop culture nerds, AND people who spent the year under a rock and have no idea what happened! Here is just a small sample of what's discussed:

CHAPPELL ROAN - JO KOY - TRUE DETECTIVE: NIGHT COUNTRY - ELMO - KIM KARDASHIAN - KATE MIDDLETON - ELLE KING - PESTO THE KING PENGUIN - WILLY WONKA - TRACY CHAPMAN - TAYLOR SWIFT - AND SO MUCH MORE!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2024The MixtapeJoin Movie of the Year as they craft the ultimate 2024 mixtape blending hits, hidden gems, and viral tracks!

The Movie of the Year podcast is back with one of its most anticipated annual traditions: creating the ultimate mixtape for 2024. This yearly event is a fan-favorite because it captures the essence of the year through music, blending diverse perspectives and celebrating the tracks that defined the cultural zeitgeist. In this special episode, the hosts pool their collective musical expertise, pop culture savvy, and unique perspectives to craft a playlist that captures the spirit of the year. This isn’t just a list of trending songs but a curated selection that reflects the highs of chart-topping anthems, the lows of heartfelt ballads capturing the year’s struggles, and the eclectic mix of niche tracks that define the moments in between. Each host brings their top picks, engages in spirited debates, and, of course, sprinkles in plenty of humor and personal anecdotes. As always, listeners are invited to join the fun, voting on their favorites and submitting their own nominations for the year’s most essential tracks.

The show is a collaborative effort in every sense of the word. The hosts strive to balance popular hits with hidden gems, ensuring the mixtape appeals to diehard music fans and casual listeners alike. The episode delves into what makes a song stand out in 2024—is it the infectious chorus, the emotional resonance, or perhaps the cultural impact? By the end of the episode, they’ll have whittled down their selections to create a cohesive mixtape that represents the soundtrack of a generation. The stakes are high, the conversations are lively, and the resulting playlist is bound to be a perfect time capsule of the year.

WHO IS GOING TO BE ON THIS 2024 MIXTAPE!?!Pop music in 2024 has been defined by a striking blend of nostalgia and innovation, with throwbacks to '90s hip-hop beats and early 2000s pop-punk riffs fused with cutting-edge AI-generated harmonies and hyperpop-inspired production. Artists have continued to mine the sounds of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, drawing inspiration from everything from '90s hip-hop to early 2000s pop-punk. These retro influences are seamlessly woven into futuristic production techniques, creating tracks that feel both familiar and groundbreaking. For example, Olivia Rodrigo’s hit single "Retrograde Heart" combines early 2000s pop-punk energy with AI-enhanced vocal layering, while Burna Boy’s genre-blending anthem "Future Roots" fuses Afrobeats rhythms with electronic synth textures. TikTok and other social media platforms remain dominant in shaping trends, with songs often going viral before they even hit traditional streaming services.

This year also saw a significant rise in genre-blending. Pop, rap, country, and electronic music no longer operate in silos but instead converge to create hybrid genres that defy categorization. Collaborations between artists from different musical worlds have become the norm, resulting in some of the year’s most exciting and unpredictable hits. Meanwhile, lyrics have trended toward introspection, with many artists exploring themes of mental health, climate anxiety, and societal change, resonating deeply with audiences navigating an uncertain world.

Another hallmark of 2024 has been the emergence of new global superstars, such as Jung Kook from BTS, Nigerian sensation Burna Boy, and Colombian powerhouse Karol G. While established icons like Taylor Swift and Drake remain influential, a new wave of artists from regions like South Korea, Africa, and Latin America has taken center stage. These artists bring unique perspectives and sounds to the global stage, further diversifying the pop landscape. Their success underscores the increasingly international nature of modern music, where language barriers matter less and less.

TAYLOR SWIFT - BAD BUNNY - OLIVIA RODRIGO - SZA - THE WEEKND - ICE SPICE - JUNG KOOK - BURNA BOY - DOJA CAT - KAROL GWhich of these artists will make the mixtape? Tune in to the episode to find out, and let us know which tracks you’d add to the ultimate playlist for 2024!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2024Oscar DraftThe 2024 mini-season kicks off with the always festive tradition of the Oscar Draft! The Movie of the Year boys, along with their Superhero Show Show co-stars Cassie and Katelynn, and Unnatural 20 fan fave Books, gather around to draft movies and see who can get the most Oscar nominations for their team. They also get a chance to start the discussion about these movies before the big Movie of the Year 2024 episode in just a couple of weeks. Tune in to see who you think won the draft, and then listen to Movie of the Year in a couple of weeks to hear who won the 2024 Oscar Draft!

A star-studded event with discussions about Wicked Part 1, Dune Part 2, Emilia Perez Part 3, and so much more!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996The Cable GuyThere are many dangers in the podcasting world. Groupies. Loop-da-Loopies. On-set in-pants poopies. But of course, the most dreaded of all is the lost episode. We here at Movie of the Year regret to inform the world that this season's missing episode is The Cable Guy, featuring Santo from the 88 Miles per Hour podcast. Tune in this week to hear Mike apologize and plug Santo's show, plus give a preview of our 2024 mini-season, and the rest of the 1996 season in a few weeks. Thanks, sorry, and go listen to 88MPH. See you next week for the Oscar Draft!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996Mission: ImpossibleExploring Mission: Impossible (1996): Brian De Palma, Tom Cruise, and Spy Film Politics

In this episode of Movie of the Year, the hosts dive deep into Mission: Impossible (1996), exploring the thrilling action, complex characters, and intricate narrative that have made it a cornerstone of modern spy cinema. Directed by Brian De Palma and starring Tom Cruise, this film not only introduced audiences to a franchise that would span decades, but also laid the groundwork for a new era of action films. From De Palma's signature direction to the political undertones of the story, the episode takes listeners on a journey through the making and impact of Mission: Impossible.

Brian De Palma's Direction in Mission: ImpossibleThe episode opens with a detailed exploration of Brian De Palma's direction, a master of suspense and psychological thrillers, whose style is woven seamlessly into Mission: Impossible. The hosts analyze how De Palma’s meticulous attention to detail and his love for intricate plots helped elevate the film from a simple spy thriller to a cinematic experience that kept audiences on the edge of their seats. From the iconic opening sequence in Prague to the tense heist scene in the CIA headquarters, De Palma’s influence is felt throughout the film. The podcast discusses how his style influenced both the tone of the film and its pacing, creating an unforgettable espionage narrative.

Tom Cruise’s Game-Changing Role in Mission: ImpossibleA major focus of the episode is Tom Cruise's role as Ethan Hunt, the determined and resourceful secret agent. The hosts delve into how Cruise’s performance helped shape the Mission: Impossible franchise, turning him into the quintessential action star of the 90s and beyond. The episode covers his dedication to performing many of his own stunts, as well as his involvement in the film's production as a producer. Listeners will learn about Cruise’s influence on the film’s tone and style, cementing his role as a driving force behind the franchise’s success.

The Politics of Mission: ImpossibleThe discussion takes an intriguing turn as the hosts examine the political undertones of Mission: Impossible. Beyond the fast-paced action, the film presents themes of trust, betrayal, and government manipulation. The podcast analyzes the portrayal of intelligence agencies and covert operations, reflecting the post-Cold War era’s anxieties about surveillance, espionage, and international intrigue. The hosts also discuss how the film touches on the idea of the "greater good" and whether Hunt’s actions are morally justified, prompting a deeper conversation about the ethics of government secrecy and deception.

The Legacy of Mission: ImpossibleThe episode wraps up with a reflection on the lasting impact of Mission: Impossible. As the starting point of one of the most successful film franchises in history, the hosts discuss how the film set the stage for sequels that would continue to redefine action cinema. From its clever narrative twists to its spectacular action sequences, Mission: Impossible remains a pivotal film in both Tom Cruise's career and the action genre as a whole.

Why You Should Listen to This EpisodeWhether you’re a long-time fan of the Mission: Impossible franchise or a newcomer to the film, this podcast episode offers insightful commentary on the making of the 1996 classic. It’s an essential listen for movie lovers who want to understand what made this film a groundbreaking entry in the world of action cinema.

Watch the Trailer and Learn MoreMission: Impossible (1996) Official Trailer

For more on Brian De Palma's directing style, check out this article on his filmmaking techniques.

What’s your favorite scene in Mission: Impossible? Let us know in the comments below! Don’t forget to subscribe to the Movie of the Year podcast for more deep dives into iconic films.

Related Episodes* Exploring La Haine (1996): A Story of Urban Struggle and Resistance * Scream (1996): Reinventing the Horror Genre

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996The Hunchback of Notre DameExploring Disney’s "The Hunchback of Notre Dame" on the Movie of the Year Podcast

Discover Disney’s boldest animated film through the lens of the Movie of the Year podcast as they dive into the ambitious and controversial 1996 adaptation of The Hunchback of Notre Dame. This animated classic challenges traditional Disney boundaries with its exploration of religion, sensuality, and a captivating musical score. Urban apartment dwellers, take note: this episode offers a fresh perspective on a film that dares to be daring.

Religion in Disney’s The Hunchback of Notre DameOne of the central themes of The Hunchback of Notre Dame is its exploration of religion. The podcast’s hosts delve into how the film portrays faith as both a source of refuge and a tool of oppression. Judge Claude Frollo, voiced with chilling gravitas by Tony Jay, embodies religious hypocrisy, twisting doctrine to justify his sinister deeds. Meanwhile, the cathedral of Notre Dame itself offers sanctuary and hope, symbolizing the redemptive aspects of faith.

The hosts highlight how the film’s darker tone resonates with urban audiences familiar with the complexities of modern spirituality. They note how Quasimodo’s deep connection to the cathedral—both his prison and his home—reflects the dual nature of organized religion, capable of both nurturing and constraining the human spirit.

Sensuality and Desire: The Horniness of Disney’s HunchbackFor a Disney film, The Hunchback of Notre Dame stands out for its overt sensuality. The podcast tackles the infamous “Hellfire” sequence, in which Frollo’s inner turmoil over his lust for Esmeralda is rendered in a fiery, operatic number. The hosts marvel at the audacity of Disney animators to include a scene that grapples with such adult themes.

Esmeralda, voiced by Demi Moore, is another focal point of discussion. Her character—confident, compassionate, and unapologetically alluring—challenges traditional Disney princess tropes. The hosts discuss how her portrayal aligns with a more mature understanding of desire and autonomy, appealing to an adult sensibility often overlooked in animated films. They also note how this layer of complexity mirrors the romantic struggles of urban life, where relationships often blur the line between attraction and complication.

Alan Menken’s Music: A Symphony of EmotionAlan Menken’s score for The Hunchback of Notre Dame is nothing short of operatic, and the podcast dedicates ample time to unpacking its grandeur. The sweeping melodies and choral arrangements lend the film an epic quality that elevates its narrative stakes. Songs like “Out There” and “God Help the Outcasts” capture the yearning and vulnerability of the characters, resonating with anyone who has ever felt marginalized.

The hosts also discuss how the music’s blend of Latin liturgical elements and Broadway sensibilities creates a unique auditory experience. They point out how the score’s sophistication feels tailor-made for urban audiences accustomed to cultural diversity and artistic ambition. Menken’s work not only serves the story but also challenges the listener to engage with the film on a deeper emotional level.

Why Urban Audiences Should Revisit Disney’s The Hunchback of Notre DameAs the Movie of the Year podcast episode illustrates, The Hunchback of Notre Dame is far more than just another entry in Disney’s animated canon. Its unflinching exploration of religion, its daring embrace of adult themes, and its unparalleled musical score make it a film that demands to be revisited.

Key Takeaways from the Podcast:* The dual nature of faith as depicted in the film. * Esmeralda’s groundbreaking role as a Disney heroine. * Alan Menken’s transformative score and its cultural resonance.

Whether you’re drawn to its complex characters, its evocative setting, or its bold thematic choices, The Hunchback of Notre Dame offers something for everyone. And with the Movie of the Year podcast as your guide, you’re sure to discover new layers to this underrated masterpiece.

Listen and ShareCo-panelist Andy Nelson, host of the Marvel Movie Minute, adds a fresh perspective to the discussion. Known for his deep dives into superhero films, Andy brings a unique lens to The Hunchback of Notre Dame, comparing its grandiose themes and complex characters to the epic storytelling often seen in Marvel movies. His insights enrich the conversation, offering listeners a nuanced appreciation for Disney’s bold storytelling.

Don’t miss this engaging discussion! Stream the Movie of the Year podcast episode about The Hunchback of Notre Dame now. Share your thoughts in the comments and join the conversation about this daring Disney classic.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996TrainspottingExploring Trainspotting (1996): Danny Boyle, Scotland’s 90s, and the Iconic Friends in FocusThe Movie of the Year podcast’s episode on Trainspotting delves into the gritty, stylish, and controversial 1996 film directed by Danny Boyle. This seminal movie captures the chaos of addiction, the humor of flawed friendship, and the vibrancy of Scotland in the 1990s. From its unforgettable ensemble cast to its iconic soundtrack, Trainspotting continues to resonate as a cultural and cinematic landmark.

Danny Boyle: The Vision Behind TrainspottingDanny Boyle, the director behind Trainspotting, is a central focus of the episode. His innovative style and ability to merge dark humor with raw emotion propelled this film—and his career—to new heights. The podcast highlights how Boyle’s kinetic direction and bold use of music, including Iggy Pop’s “Lust for Life” and Underworld’s “Born Slippy,” turned Trainspotting into a sensory masterpiece.

The hosts also explore how Boyle’s compassionate lens captures the humanity of even the most flawed characters. They discuss how this approach laid the groundwork for his future films, including Slumdog Millionaire and 28 Days Later, cementing Boyle’s status as a visionary filmmaker.

The Film’s Group of Friends: Complex, Flawed, and UnforgettableAt its heart, Trainspotting is a character-driven story about a group of friends navigating heroin addiction, poverty, and fleeting hope. The podcast celebrates the cast’s stellar performances:

• Ewan McGregor as Renton: The conflicted protagonist seeking a way out of the chaos.
• Robert Carlyle as Begbie: A volatile presence who adds danger to every scene.
• Ewen Bremner as Spud: The lovable screw-up whose humanity shines through.
• Jonny Lee Miller as Sick Boy: The charming schemer with a sharp tongue.

The hosts dive into how these characters strike a balance between humor and heartbreak, creating a portrayal of friendship that is as chaotic as it is relatable.

Scotland of the 90s: A Stark Yet Vibrant BackdropThe podcast’s discussion extends to the setting: Scotland in the 1990s. Trainspotting portrays a gritty Edinburgh where picturesque landscapes contrast with urban decay. This vivid backdrop is more than just scenery; it’s a character in itself.

The episode examines the socio-economic challenges of the time, including unemployment and drug epidemics, which shaped the film’s narrative. The hosts also commend Danny Boyle’s authentic use of Scottish dialect and real locations, which ground the story in its cultural moment.

Why Trainspotting Still MattersThe Movie of the Year podcast passionately argues that Trainspotting remains an essential cinematic experience. Danny Boyle’s daring vision, the unforgettable group of friends, and its authentic depiction of Scotland’s 90s culture ensure its lasting impact.

For podcast listeners and movie lovers, this episode offers fresh insights into a film that continues to challenge, inspire, and entertain.

Debut BuddiesIf you enjoyed our guest-star Nate on this episode, make sure to check out his podcast Debut Buddies!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996La HaineA Deep Dive into the 1996 French Film on Movie of the Year PodcastThe Movie of the Year podcast takes a bold step into the world of French cinema with its latest episode, focusing on the 1996 classic, La Haine. Directed by Mathieu Kassovitz, this black-and-white masterpiece explores friendship, systemic inequality, and police brutality in the urban landscapes of Paris. In this episode, the hosts unravel the layers of La Haine, delivering a comprehensive analysis of its characters, themes, and visual storytelling.

Fans of La Haine and podcast lovers alike won’t want to miss this in-depth discussion of one of the most compelling films of the 1990s.

The Characters: Vinz, Said, and HubertAt the heart of La Haine are its unforgettable protagonists: Vinz, Said, and Hubert. Each character represents a unique response to the struggles of marginalized communities in France.

• Vinz is the volatile leader, driven by anger and a thirst for revenge. His possession of a gun becomes a chilling symbol of his inner turmoil and the precarious balance between power and destruction.
• Said, the mediator and joker, offers moments of levity while reflecting the frustration of a young man stuck in an oppressive system.
• Hubert, the philosophical boxer, provides a counterpoint to Vinz’s rage. The harsh reality of systemic barriers tempers his dreams of escape.

The podcast hosts analyze how these characters navigate their environment and how their friendship anchors the story’s emotional depth. Their discussion makes it clear why Vinz, Said, and Hubert remain iconic figures in cinema.

Police Brutality in La Haine: A Podcast PerspectiveOne of the most striking elements of La Haine is its unflinching portrayal of police brutality and institutional violence. The podcast delves into how Mathieu Kassovitz uses tense confrontations to expose the systemic oppression faced by the film's characters.

The infamous scene where Vinz mimics Travis Bickle from Taxi Driver becomes a focal point of the discussion, highlighting the dangerous allure of violence as a means of reclaiming power. The hosts draw parallels between the film’s narrative and contemporary global movements against police violence, making the conversation both timely and impactful.

Black-and-White Cinematography in La Haine: A Timeless ChoiceWhy did Kassovitz choose to shoot La Haine in black and white? The Movie of the Year hosts explore this artistic decision, emphasizing how it enhances the film’s raw and timeless feel.

The stark contrasts of light and shadow heighten the story's intensity, while the monochrome palette removes distractions, focusing viewers on the characters and their environment. The podcast also touches on how the lack of color symbolizes the moral gray areas the trio must navigate, adding another layer to the film’s depth.

Why You Should Listen to This Podcast Episode?The Movie of the Year podcast episode on La Haine goes beyond a typical review. The hosts offer a comprehensive and engaging tribute to this iconic piece of French cinema by examining the film's rich characters, social commentary, and visual artistry.

Whether you're a longtime fan of La Haine or curious about why it remains a cultural touchstone, this episode provides valuable insights.

FAQs About La HaineWhy is La Haine considered a classic?

La Haine is celebrated for its powerful storytelling, social relevance, and innovative use of black-and-white cinematography, making it one of the defining films of the 1990s.

What themes does La Haine explore?

The film tackles systemic inequality, police brutality, friendship, and the struggles of marginalized communities in France.

Where can I listen to this podcast episode?

Find the Movie of the Year podcast episode on La Haine on all major streaming platforms or the podcast’s official website.

Conclusion: A Timeless MasterpieceThe Movie of the Year podcast’s exploration of La Haine is an enlightening journey through one of the most impactful films of the 1990s. With its analysis of characters like Vinz, Said, and Hubert, its critique of police brutality, and its appreciation for black-and-white cinematography, this episode is a must-listen for movie lovers.

Don’t miss your chance to dive into La Haine with this insightful podcast. Listen now and experience the timeless relevance of Kassovitz’s masterpiece.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996Action Figure Draft, Part IIThe exciting conclusion to the Action Figure Draft! In the Movie of the Year episode, "1996 Action Figure Draft," the hosts dive headfirst into a playful yet fiercely competitive draft of action figures inspired by the movies, TV shows, and pop culture moments of 1996. With creativity and nostalgia at the forefront, each host builds their ultimate lineup of action figures, selecting from iconic characters, unexpected deep cuts, and some hilariously wild-card choices. As they defend their picks and strategize to outshine one another, listeners are treated to a blend of witty banter, pop culture insight, and surprising revelations about what made 1996 such a dynamic year for fandoms. Who will create the most legendary action figure lineup? Tune in to find out!

This draft isn’t just a free-for-all; it’s structured around classic fantasy archetypes to add a layer of strategy and hilarity. Each host must fill five key positions: wizard, bard, fighter, ranger, and cleric. The wizard role demands a character with mystical or intellectual prowess, sparking debates about the most iconic magical figures of 1996. The bard requires a pick with charisma and flair, leading to unexpected choices that highlight 1996’s quirky pop culture personalities. The fighter slot is all about raw power and combat skills, challenging the hosts to think outside the box while balancing nostalgia with practicality.

The ranger position, embodying agility and resourcefulness, opens the door for characters tied to adventure and exploration. Finally, the cleric brings the healing and moral compass, pushing the hosts to consider who best embodies support and guidance from that year's cultural icons. As the draft progresses, alliances form, rivalries deepen, and the room fills with passionate arguments over what makes a character truly worthy of these roles. Whether it’s a certain red-and-black-clad antihero, a beloved animated duo, or a live-action hero from a blockbuster hit, each pick brings a blend of laughter, surprises, and some seriously persuasive justifications.

Who will emerge victorious in assembling the most balanced and beloved party of action figures? Will the wizard steal the show, or will an unexpected bard choice turn the tide? This episode is a must-listen for anyone who loves pop culture debates, nostalgic deep dives, and a touch of geeky fantasy flair.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996Action Figure DraftIn the Movie of the Year episode, "1996 Action Figure Draft," the hosts dive headfirst into a playful yet fiercely competitive draft of action figures inspired by the movies, TV shows, and pop culture moments of 1996. With creativity and nostalgia at the forefront, each host builds their ultimate lineup of action figures, selecting from iconic characters, unexpected deep cuts, and some hilariously wild-card choices. As they defend their picks and strategize to outshine one another, listeners are treated to a blend of witty banter, pop culture insight, and surprising revelations about what made 1996 such a dynamic year for fandoms. Who will create the most legendary action figure lineup? Tune in to find out!

This draft isn’t just a free-for-all; it’s structured around classic fantasy archetypes to add a layer of strategy and hilarity. Each host must fill five key positions: wizard, bard, fighter, ranger, and cleric. The wizard role demands a character with mystical or intellectual prowess, sparking debates about the most iconic magical figures of 1996. The bard requires a pick with charisma and flair, leading to unexpected choices that highlight 1996’s quirky pop culture personalities. The fighter slot is all about raw power and combat skills, challenging the hosts to think outside the box while balancing nostalgia with practicality.

The ranger position, embodying agility and resourcefulness, opens the door for characters tied to adventure and exploration. Finally, the cleric brings the healing and moral compass, pushing the hosts to consider who best embodies support and guidance from that year's cultural icons. As the draft progresses, alliances form, rivalries deepen, and the room fills with passionate arguments over what makes a character truly worthy of these roles. Whether it’s a certain red-and-black-clad antihero, a beloved animated duo, or a live-action hero from a blockbuster hit, each pick brings a blend of laughter, surprises, and some seriously persuasive justifications.

Who will emerge victorious in assembling the most balanced and beloved party of action figures? Will the wizard steal the show, or will an unexpected bard choice turn the tide? This episode is a must-listen for anyone who loves pop culture debates, nostalgic deep dives, and a touch of geeky fantasy flair.

View Details

Breaking the WavesIn this episode of Movie of the Year, we dive into the haunting world of Breaking the Waves (1996), Lars von Trier’s unforgettable drama that challenges viewers with its exploration of faith, love, and sacrifice. This episode offers insights into Emily Watson’s career-defining performance, von Trier’s complex religious themes, and the raw aesthetic of Dogme 95.

Why should every cinephile experience Breaking the Waves? Join us as we unpack why this groundbreaking film deserves its place in cinematic history.

Emily Watson's Performance: A Breakthrough Role in Breaking the WavesEmily Watson’s portrayal of Bess McNeill in Breaking the Waves is one of the most intense and moving performances of the 1990s. In her film debut, Watson brings innocence, emotional depth, and sheer vulnerability to the character. Her raw approach to Bess’s journey—from devotion to despair and ultimate redemption—is a showcase of talent that resonates deeply with audiences.

Our panel delves into Watson’s acting choices, discussing how she embodies Bess’s unwavering faith and fierce love, and how this performance launched her into a successful career. For fans of powerful, emotionally charged performances, Breaking the Waves is essential viewing.

Lars von Trier’s Vision and Religion in Breaking the WavesBreaking the Waves is rich with themes of spirituality, suffering, and sacrifice. Lars von Trier, known for his unflinching style, presents a story that explores how faith can be both a source of strength and a source of tragedy. As Bess’s life takes increasingly harrowing turns, von Trier invites viewers to confront their own beliefs and moral boundaries.

In this episode, we unpack von Trier’s portrayal of religion—not as a comfort, but as a force that drives Bess toward self-sacrifice. The panel discusses how the director’s exploration of faith and redemption in Breaking the Waves poses questions that resonate deeply, especially for viewers interested in films that challenge traditional moral perspectives.

Dogme 95: The Gritty Realism Behind the MovementThe film is notable for its adherence to Dogme 95 principles, a filmmaking manifesto founded by von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg to bring realism and emotional rawness to cinema. Dogme 95 emphasizes natural lighting, handheld camerawork, and minimal special effects, all of which give Breaking the Waves an unfiltered, almost documentary-like quality.

Our hosts discuss how this aesthetic choice contributes to the film’s unsettling beauty, immersing viewers directly into the rugged coastal landscapes and intimate struggles of Bess’s life. If you’re fascinated by minimalistic, boundary-pushing cinema, this exploration of Dogme 95 is a must-listen.

Why Breaking the Waves is a Must-Watch from 1996The movie stands as a cinematic landmark, pushing the boundaries of emotional storytelling, religious themes, and raw visual style. Our Movie of the Year episode encourages listeners to re-examine this classic and consider the lasting influence of Emily Watson’s breakthrough performance, Lars von Trier’s bold narrative choices, and the unfiltered realism of Dogme 95.

If you’re a fan of intense dramas and films that challenge conventional storytelling, tune in to this episode to discover why Breaking the Waves continues to captivate audiences decades after its release.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996Swingers (feat. Conor from iFanboy!)In this Movie of the Year episode, the hosts dive into Swingers, the iconic 1996 film that brought male friendship, 1990s L.A. nightlife, and swing dancing back into the cultural spotlight. Swingers not only redefined indie cinema but also launched the careers of Doug Liman and Jon Favreau, who would go on to become Hollywood heavyweights. This episode unpacks the film’s timeless appeal by exploring its unique take on male camaraderie, its unforgettable swing dance scenes, and the remarkable backstory of Liman and Favreau’s collaboration.

Male Friendships in Swingers: Redefining Bromance on the Big ScreenOne of Swingers’ enduring legacies is its portrayal of post-breakup male friendships. In this episode, the hosts examine how Jon Favreau’s character, Mike, leans on his friends—most notably the brash yet lovable Trent, played by Vince Vaughn—to overcome heartache and rediscover his confidence. Rather than a cliché “bro” dynamic, Swingers presents male friendships with depth and sincerity, showing how friends help each other through life’s awkward, often painful phases. The podcast explores why these friendships resonate, especially for audiences navigating similar relationships and social struggles.

Doug Liman and Jon Favreau: The Vision Behind SwingersWith just a modest budget, Doug Liman and Jon Favreau created Swingers, a film that captured the spirit of a generation. The hosts discuss how Favreau’s semi-autobiographical script was brought to life by Liman’s guerrilla-style direction, using handheld shots and natural lighting that lend the movie an authentic, documentary feel. Favreau’s clever, fast-paced dialogue—a staple of Swingers—cements the film’s place in pop culture, while Liman’s distinct approach sets the tone for future indie films. The episode highlights how Liman and Favreau went from indie darlings to Hollywood icons and why their collaboration still matters today.

Swing Dancing: A Cultural Revival Captured in SwingersThe swing dancing scenes in Swingers are integral to the film’s style and story, reflecting a broader swing dance revival in the 1990s. The Movie of the Year hosts trace this cultural phenomenon, explaining how the music and dance moves in Swingers helped revive a retro dance form for a new generation. The film’s soundtrack, featuring bands like Big Bad Voodoo Daddy, became synonymous with Swingers’ identity, offering a blend of cool and nostalgia. The podcast discusses how these scenes captured the swing dance revival authentically, making Swingers a time capsule of '90s cool.

Special Guest Conor Kilpatrick from iFanboy Joins the ConversationAdding to the discussion is special guest Conor Kilpatrick from iFanboy, bringing fresh insights and humor to this Swingers deep dive. A fan of both films and comics, Conor connects the Swingers characters with relatable “everyman” qualities that resonate across both movie and comic book fandoms. His perspective adds depth, especially when he compares the film’s characters to beloved archetypes in comic lore, and his energetic contributions make for an engaging episode filled with sharp insights and good laughs.

Why Swingers Is "So Money" and Still RelevantThe hosts close with a look at Swingers’ lasting impact and why it continues to captivate audiences. For fans of indie films, ’90s culture, or anyone who’s ever leaned on friends to get through hard times, this Movie of the Year episode celebrates why the movie remains “so money.” Whether you’re nostalgic for swing dancing or simply curious about the film’s unique take on friendship, this episode offers a comprehensive and entertaining look at Swingers.

Listen to the Episode: Ready to explore Swingers? Tune in now and join the hosts and Conor Kilpatrick as they dissect one of the ’90s most iconic films.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996The Mixtape, Part II (feat. Nate from Debut Buddies!)The Taste Buds continue to take a break from revisiting the films of 1996 to keep co-creating a 1996 mixtape! Grab a Surge, make some Bagel Bites, and see what songs get picked!

In this episode of Movie of the Year, the hosts take a break from the silver screen to dive into the sonic landscape of 1996. Join them as they create the ultimate playlist, featuring the most iconic tracks from a year that brought us genre-defining music. From the peak of alternative rock to the rise of hip-hop, and pop hits that still resonate today, they discuss the artists, albums, and unforgettable moments that shaped the soundtrack of '96. Whether you're reliving the glory days or discovering the era for the first time, this playlist is your gateway to the heart of the '90s.

Why 1996 Was a Defining Year for Music 1996 was a landmark year in music. With genres like alternative rock, hip-hop, and pop all making waves, the year produced songs that continue to resonate today. It was a time of cultural change and set the stage for the music industry in the late '90s and early 2000s.

Listen to the Mixtape here:

https://open.spotify.com/playlist/3qZo27PgNeWzVoOXv7Gxp0?si=4954ae3764c34d0b

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996The Mixtape (feat. Nate from Debut Buddies!)The Taste Buds take a break from revisiting the films of 1996 to co-create a 1996 mixtape! Grab a Surge, make some Bagel Bites, and see what songs get picked!

In this episode of Movie of the Year, the hosts take a break from the silver screen to dive into the sonic landscape of 1996. Join them as they create the ultimate playlist, featuring the most iconic tracks from a year that brought us genre-defining music. From the peak of alternative rock to the rise of hip-hop, and pop hits that still resonate today, they discuss the artists, albums, and unforgettable moments that shaped the soundtrack of '96. Whether you're reliving the glory days or discovering the era for the first time, this playlist is your gateway to the heart of the '90s.

Why 1996 Was a Defining Year for Music 1996 was a landmark year in music. With genres like alternative rock, hip-hop, and pop all making waves, the year produced songs that continue to resonate today. It was a time of cultural change and set the stage for the music industry in the late '90s and early 2000s.

Tune in next week to hear the exciting conclusion, when the playlist on Spotify will be revealed!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996Mars Attacks! (feat. Paul from Waiting For Doom!)In this episode of the Movie of the Year podcast, the hosts dissect Mars Attacks!, Tim Burton’s star-studded, darkly comedic, and satirical take on alien invasion movies. Released in 1996, Mars Attacks! blends sci-fi with Burton’s unique quirky style, creating a cult classic filled with humor, horror, and biting social commentary. This deep dive covers everything from Burton’s vision to the film’s eccentric ensemble cast and the cynical undertones driving the plot.

Tim Burton’s Unique Vision for Mars Attacks!One of the key points discussed in this Movie of the Year episode is Tim Burton’s distinct creative style and how it shapes Mars Attacks!. Known for his darkly whimsical films, such as Edward Scissorhands and Beetlejuice, Burton was at the peak of his career in the 90s. Mars Attacks! fits squarely into his love for campy, exaggerated B-movies, while offering a modern take on the classic alien invasion genre.

The hosts examine how Burton's practical effects and early CGI create an otherworldly yet campy aesthetic. The exaggerated character designs of the Martians, along with their chaotic behavior, reflect Burton’s signature blend of the grotesque and the humorous. His direction adds layers to what could have been a simple homage to 1950s sci-fi, transforming it into something both original and absurdly chaotic.

The Star-Studded Ensemble Cast of Mars Attacks!The podcast explores the impressive ensemble cast of Mars Attacks!, which includes big names like Jack Nicholson, Glenn Close, Annette Bening, Pierce Brosnan, and a young Natalie Portman. Each actor embraces the film’s bizarre and comedic tone, with Nicholson standing out in dual roles as the U.S. President and a sleazy Las Vegas developer.

The Movie of the Year hosts analyzes how Burton uses this all-star cast to subvert genre conventions, frequently dispatching major characters in surprisingly brutal ways. This decision to “kill off” so many stars adds to the film’s unpredictable, chaotic nature. The ensemble cast also highlights the sheer scale of the film, with each actor bringing their unique energy to the outrageous situations they find themselves in—whether it’s running from Martian lasers or trying to reason with the alien invaders.

Exploring the Cynicism in Mars Attacks!Beyond its absurd humor and visual chaos, Mars Attacks! is filled with a biting cynicism about American politics and culture. The podcast delves into how Burton uses the film’s comedic violence and caricatured characters to comment on human arrogance, particularly the overconfidence of government officials, military leaders, and scientists. Despite their resources and plans, humanity is powerless against the relentless, nonsensical violence of the Martians.

This layer of cynicism gives Mars Attacks! its satirical edge, mocking the ineptitude of leadership and blind nationalism. The Movie of the Year hosts discuss how Burton's portrayal of politicians and military figures, who are often more concerned with appearances than solutions, resonates with modern audiences. The film becomes not only an homage to sci-fi but also a darkly humorous critique of societal institutions, offering relevant commentary on government incompetence and human folly.

Guest Star Spotlight: Paul from Waiting for DoomA special treat for this episode is the appearance of Paul, co-host of the Waiting for Doom podcast, which is dedicated to all things Doom Patrol and comic book culture. Paul brings a wealth of knowledge about pop culture and superhero media, making his contributions to the discussion of Mars Attacks! insightful and engaging.

Paul’s podcast, Waiting for Doom, dives deep into the quirky and surreal world of Doom Patrol, a comic book series known for its offbeat characters and unconventional narratives—paralleling the eccentric tone of Mars Attacks! With his background in analyzing outlandish, genre-defying stories, Paul adds a unique layer to the discussion, offering fans of Mars Attacks! an informed viewpoint on why the film resonates with fans of quirky, subversive media.

Paul’s presence also enriches the conversation by drawing parallels between the surreal humor of Doom Patrol and the absurdity of Mars Attacks!, showing how both properties use their outlandish premises to explore deeper themes. His insights into how Burton handles the film’s blend of comedy, horror, and sci-fi offer a fresh perspective for long-time fans and newcomers alike.

The Movie of the Year episode covering Mars Attacks! is a must-listen for fans of Tim Burton, sci-fi, and cult classics. With a star-studded cast, dark humor, and a healthy dose of cynicism, the movie has maintained its place in pop culture, and the podcast offers an insightful analysis of why. From Burton’s signature style to the underlying satirical tones, this episode provides a fresh perspective on a film that still manages to feel relevant today.

Whether you're a die-hard Burton fan or just love a good alien invasion romp, this Movie of the Year episode brings new appreciation for Mars Attacks! and its place in the 90s cinema.

• IMDb page for Mars Attacks!
• Tim Burton’s Filmography on IMDb
• History of 1950s Alien Invasion Movies
• All things Waiting for Doom!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996Scream (feat. Pete from Marvel Movie Minute!)In the latest episode of the Movie of the Year podcast, the panel takes a deep dive into Wes Craven’s 1996 genre-defining film, Scream. A landmark in horror cinema, Scream reinvigorated the slasher genre by blending suspense with self-aware satire. This episode of the podcast explores why Scream still resonates with audiences and how it redefined the horror landscape. With guest star Pete from The Marvel Movie Minute, the discussion ranges from the brilliance of Wes Craven’s direction to the impressive acting of the cast and the motivations behind the film's creation. Whether you’re a die-hard horror fan or a casual moviegoer, this episode is packed with insights that shed new light on one of the most iconic films of the 90s.

Wes Craven Rewriting Horror with ScreamWes Craven’s Scream did more than entertain; it rewrote the rules of horror. The Movie of the Year podcast hosts explore how Craven took the slasher film, a genre in decline by the mid-90s, and injected it with fresh energy. The episode highlights Craven’s clever use of meta-commentary, allowing characters in the film to reference horror clichés while still getting caught in them. This self-awareness made Scream stand out, giving it a unique edge that both honored and subverted the genre’s conventions.

Craven’s use of humor alongside genuine horror is a major talking point. The panel discusses how Scream walked a fine line between parody and suspense, ensuring that the scares never felt cheap despite the film’s satirical tone. By rewriting the narrative rules, Craven breathed new life into a genre that had become predictable, paving the way for a new wave of horror films.

The Acting Skills of the Cast of the Scream!The Movie of the Year episode doesn’t shy away from celebrating the incredible performances that helped make Scream a classic. Neve Campbell’s portrayal of Sidney Prescott, the film’s resilient final girl, takes center stage in the discussion. The hosts praise Campbell for bringing depth to a character that could have been just another slasher movie victim. Sidney’s evolution from a vulnerable teenager to an empowered survivor is one of the reasons Scream became more than a typical horror film.

Courteney Cox’s performance as the ambitious journalist Gale Weathers is another highlight. Cox brought a sharp edge to her role, crafting a character who was ruthless yet likable. The panel also takes time to recognize David Arquette’s quirky portrayal of Dewey, the well-meaning but often bumbling deputy. These performances helped establish Scream’s balance of humor and horror, keeping the film both entertaining and terrifying.

Guest Star: Pete from The Marvel Movie MinuteIn this episode, Pete, co-host of the Marvel Movie Minute podcast, joins the discussion with his unique perspective on Scream. Known for analyzing superhero movies, Pete draws intriguing comparisons between Scream and the modern superhero genre, particularly how both have embraced meta-narratives in recent years. Pete praises the cast, especially Matthew Lillard as Stu, for adding unpredictable energy to the film. He also appreciates how Skeet Ulrich keeps viewers on edge with his portrayal of Billy, a character whose motivations remain unclear until the climactic reveal.

Pete brings a fresh voice to the episode, offering valuable insights into how Scream's characters and story structure continue to influence filmmakers today. His enthusiasm for film analysis helps tie together key elements of why Scream remains a standout in modern cinema.

The Motives of MoviemakingA recurring theme in this Movie of the Year episode is the creative motivation behind Scream. Wes Craven and screenwriter Kevin Williamson set out to critique and celebrate horror movies simultaneously. By the mid-90s, the slasher genre had grown stale with formulaic stories and predictable jump scares. Craven’s mission with Scream was to challenge those conventions while still delivering an engaging horror experience.

The panel delves into the satirical nature of the film, noting how Scream works as both a thriller and a commentary on why audiences love horror. The film asks viewers to think about why certain tropes, like the final girl or the masked killer, endure in horror. The episode examines Craven’s and Williamson’s motives in making a film that wasn’t just about scaring people but about engaging them in a larger conversation about the genre’s mechanics. This approach gave Scream depth, elevating it beyond standard slasher fare.

Why Scream Still Reigns as a Horror ClassicThe Movie of the Year podcast panel concludes with a thoughtful discussion on why Scream continues to hold a special place in the hearts of horror fans. The film’s ability to be both terrifying and self-aware set a new standard for horror filmmaking. Wes Craven’s deft touch, combined with standout performances from the cast, ensured Scream would be remembered as a classic.

The episode emphasizes the film's lasting legacy. Not only did Scream inspire a slew of sequels and imitators, but it also reinvigorated interest in the horror genre as a whole. With its blend of tension, wit, and genre-savvy storytelling, Scream remains a benchmark for what modern horror can achieve. As the panelists note, Craven’s ability to break the fourth wall while maintaining a gripping narrative is a feat few filmmakers have matched since.

This Movie of the Year episode about Scream (1996) is a must-listen for anyone who loves horror films or has a passion for cinema analysis. The panel provides an engaging and insightful look at how Wes Craven redefined the genre with his iconic film. From the stellar performances of the cast to the motives behind the film’s creation, the episode breaks down why Scream continues to resonate nearly 30 years after its release. With guest star Pete from The Marvel Movie Minute adding an extra layer of insight, this episode will leave listeners with a deeper appreciation of Scream and its place in movie history.

Find all of Pete's podcasts here, at TruStory FM!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996The People Vs Larry FlyntIn this episode of the Movie of the Year podcast, the hosts dive into one of the most controversial films of the 1990s: The People vs. Larry Flynt. Directed by Milos Forman and starring Woody Harrelson and Courtney Love, this 1996 biographical drama tells the story of Larry Flynt, the notorious publisher of Hustler magazine. It’s more than just a courtroom drama, though—it’s a deep exploration of free speech, censorship, and morality, wrapped up in a real-life story that’s as outrageous as it is thought-provoking.

The People vs. the Real Larry Flynt: Champion of Free Speech or Just Provocateur?The conversation kicks off with a look at the real Larry Flynt, the man who built an empire by pushing the boundaries of taste and legality. Flynt was no stranger to controversy, and the film dives headfirst into his most famous battle—his 1988 Supreme Court case, Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, which became a landmark ruling in favor of free speech.

The hosts break down how the film portrays Flynt as both a larger-than-life personality and a defender of First Amendment rights. But they don’t shy away from discussing Flynt's contradictions. Was he truly fighting for free speech, or was he using the legal system to justify his often offensive content? This debate adds depth to the discussion and helps paint a fuller picture of Flynt as both a cultural disruptor and a complicated figure.

Woody and Courtney: A Surprising Dynamic DuoThe hosts then turn their attention to the film's two central performances: Woody Harrelson as Larry Flynt and Courtney Love as his wife, Althea Leasure. Woody Harrelson delivers a career-defining performance, bringing a surprising amount of nuance and vulnerability to a character who could have easily been portrayed as just a crude provocateur. His portrayal of Flynt showcases both the man's relentless pursuit of personal freedom and his inner turmoil.

But it’s Courtney Love who really grabs the spotlight in this episode’s discussion. Known more for her rock star persona than her acting, Love shocked critics and audiences alike with her emotionally raw performance as Althea. The hosts explore how Love’s portrayal of Althea added a layer of tragedy to the film, grounding Flynt’s often chaotic life with real human emotion. The chemistry between Harrelson and Love is another highlight, bringing a sense of authenticity to their relationship and adding emotional depth to the movie.

The People vs Larry Flynt's Milos Forman: Master of MavericksOf course, none of this would have worked without the direction of Milos Forman, a master of telling stories about rebellious, complex characters. The hosts dive into how The People vs. Larry Flynt fits into Forman’s body of work, particularly his fascination with figures who challenge authority, like in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest and Amadeus.

Forman’s direction is both restrained and provocative, allowing the larger themes of free speech and censorship to play out naturally through the story without hitting the audience over the head. His unique background, having lived through censorship in his native Czechoslovakia, gives him a particular sensitivity to these issues. The hosts discuss how this outsider perspective allowed Forman to bring a balanced approach to the story, making it not just a tale about a controversial publisher but a broader commentary on American freedoms.

Why The People vs. Larry Flynt Still MattersAs the episode wraps up, the hosts reflect on why The People vs. Larry Flynt remains relevant today. Free speech debates haven’t gone anywhere, and in many ways, they’ve only become more heated. The film’s portrayal of the tension between personal freedom and societal standards still resonates, especially in today’s politically charged climate.

The hosts encourage listeners to revisit the movie, not just for its stellar performances or its historical context, but for its timely relevance. The People vs. Larry Flynt isn’t just a snapshot of a moment in legal history—it’s a reminder of the ongoing debate about the limits of free expression, the role of media, and the fine line between free speech and morality.

The People vs. Larry Flynt - A Thought-Provoking Dive Into a Provocative FilmWhether you’re a fan of Woody Harrelson, fascinated by the real Larry Flynt, or a lover of Milos Forman’s work, this Movie of the Year episode offers a rich, thoughtful dive into The People vs. Larry Flynt. It’s not just a movie review—it’s a conversation about freedom, art, and the complicated personalities that shape both.

This episode is a must-listen for movie lovers and anyone interested in the intersections of film, law, and culture. Tune in to hear the hosts' in-depth analysis of a film that continues to spark debate nearly 30 years after its release.

Related Episodes* A Nightmare on Elm Street Review * Milos Forman's Amadeus (with Katie Walsh!)

Learn More About The People vs. Larry Flynt IMDb: The People vs. Larry Flynt * Wikipedia: Larry Flynt * Supreme Court Case: Hustler Magazine v. Falwell*

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996The Sweet 16On last week's episode, the Taste Buds eliminated 32 movies from the 1996 bracket. This week, they eliminate 16 more, and finalize the 16 movies that will be eligible to win the trophy for Movie of the Year: 1996!

Check out the season finale for 1984, and the rest of the episodes of Movie of the Year, here!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1996A New Season BeginsIt's time to dive into the movies of 1996! Fresh off of anointing the 1984 Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds are back at it with 1996! It's one of the most formative years of our young panelists' lives, and they are ready to rip it apart, dig around, and choose the single greatest movie of the year.

Join them, as they start with the Top 64 movies, according to Letterboxd, along with some of their own favorites sprinkled in for good measure. Can their choices, Lone Star, Big Night, and The Truth About Cats and Dogs make it out of the first round, or will they get trounced by the big guns, like Fargo, Trainspotting, and Scream? All we know now is that 64 movies are coming into the CinemaDome, but only 32 are coming out the other side.

And make sure to tune in next week, when they take that 32 down to the 16 movies of 1996 they will be focusing on this season!

Check out the season finale for 1984, and the rest of the episodes of Movie of the Year, here!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984The Finale, Part IIThis is it! The guests have gone home, the movies have been discussed, and it's time to finally pick the film that will be known forever as the 1984 Movie of the Year! Join the Taste Buds as they take the bracket from 16 to 1, while also handing out a dozen Mooties, the most important award in show business!

THE ADVENTURES OF BUCKAROO BANZAI - ALL OF ME - AMADEUS - BEVERLY HILLS COP - BREAKIN 2: ELECTRIC BOOGALOO - GHOSTBUSTERS - GREMLINS - INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM - THE KARATE KID - A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET - ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA - PARIS, TEXAS - REPO MAN - STOP MAKING SENSE - THE TERMINATOR - THIS IS SPINAL TAP

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984The Finale, Part IIThis is it! The guests have gone home, the movies have been discussed, and it's time to finally pick the film that will be known forever as the 1984 Movie of the Year! Join the Taste Buds as they take the bracket from 16 to 1, while also handing out a dozen Mooties, the most important award in show business!

THE ADVENTURES OF BUCKAROO BANZAI - ALL OF ME - AMADEUS - BEVERLY HILLS COP - BREAKIN 2: ELECTRIC BOOGALOO - GHOSTBUSTERS - GREMLINS - INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM - THE KARATE KID - A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET - ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA - PARIS, TEXAS - REPO MAN - STOP MAKING SENSE - THE TERMINATOR - THIS IS SPINAL TAP

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984The Finale, Part IThis is it! The guests have gone home, the movies have been discussed, and it's time to finally pick the film that will be known forever as the 1984 Movie of the Year! Join the Taste Buds as they take the bracket from 16 to 1, while also handing out a dozen Mooties, the most important award in show business!

THE ADVENTURES OF BUCKAROO BANZAI - ALL OF ME - AMADEUS - BEVERLY HILLS COP - BREAKIN 2: ELECTRIC BOOGALOO - GHOSTBUSTERS - GREMLINS - INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM - THE KARATE KID - A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET - ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA - PARIS, TEXAS - REPO MAN - STOP MAKING SENSE - THE TERMINATOR - THIS IS SPINAL TAP

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984A Nightmare on Elm StreetExploring A Nightmare on Elm Street: A Dive into the Movie of the Year Podcast EpisodeIn the realm of horror cinema, few films stand as tall as Wes Craven's A Nightmare on Elm Street. This 1984 classic not only redefined the genre but also sparked a franchise that still sends shivers down spines today. If you're a fan of the genre and a podcast enthusiast, then the Movie of the Year podcast episode that delves into A Nightmare on Elm Street is a must-listen. This episode unpacks the film’s themes, its production challenges, and the messages it conveyed to 1980s audiences. Below, we explore some of the key points discussed in the episode, touching on topics such as the “Kids vs. their parents” dynamic, the low-budget brilliance of Wes Craven, and the underlying messages of 80’s horror films.

Kids vs. Their Parents: Generational Conflict in A Nightmare on Elm StreetOne of the most fascinating elements of A Nightmare on Elm Street is its portrayal of the generational divide. The Movie of the Year podcast does an excellent job of highlighting how the film taps into the anxieties of both teens and their parents. In the movie, Freddy Krueger, the boogeyman who terrorizes teens in their dreams, is a figure born from the sins of the parents. The adults in the film are largely absent, dismissive, or ineffectual, symbolizing a disconnection from their children’s struggles. This generational conflict is central to the narrative, as the teenagers are left to fend for themselves against an almost omnipotent force.

The podcast delves into how this theme resonated with 1980s audiences, a time when the gap between generations felt especially pronounced. The teens in the film, led by Nancy Thompson, embody the era's rebellious spirit, taking matters into their own hands when their parents refuse to confront the horrors they created. This tension between youth and authority is a hallmark of the decade’s horror films, and A Nightmare on Elm Street exemplifies it perfectly.

The Low-Budget Genius of Wes CravenWes Craven's ingenuity is another highlight of the podcast episode. A Nightmare on Elm Street was made on a modest budget, yet it manages to deliver some of the most iconic and terrifying scenes in horror history. The Movie of the Year hosts discuss how Craven’s resourcefulness helped the film transcend its financial limitations. From the creation of Freddy Krueger’s infamous glove to the dream sequences, every aspect of the film is meticulously crafted to maximize impact without breaking the bank.

The episode also touches on Craven's ability to tap into universal fears, a skill that allowed him to create memorable horror on a shoestring budget. This discussion offers listeners a deeper appreciation of Craven's work and the challenges he overcame to bring his vision to life. His influence on low-budget filmmaking is undeniable, and A Nightmare on Elm Street serves as a testament to what can be achieved with creativity and a clear vision, even when resources are scarce.

The Messages of 80’s Horror FilmsThe Movie of the Year episode also explores the broader context of 1980s horror films and the messages they conveyed. A Nightmare on Elm Street is more than just a series of scares; it’s a reflection of the cultural and societal anxieties of the time. The podcast highlights how the film, like many others from the era, can be seen as a commentary on issues such as suburban malaise, the breakdown of the nuclear family, and the fear of the unknown.

In the 1980s, horror films often acted as a mirror to the anxieties bubbling beneath the surface of American society. Whether it was the fear of technological advancements, nuclear war, or the rise of consumerism, these films offered a way to confront and explore those fears in a controlled environment. A Nightmare on Elm Street touches on the dread of losing control, the terror of the mind turning against itself, and the consequences of trying to bury the past. While wrapped in a supernatural package, these themes spoke to the real-world concerns of the era and continue to resonate with audiences today.

Conclusion: A Must-Listen for Horror FansThe Movie of the Year episode on A Nightmare on Elm Street is a compelling exploration of a horror classic. From the generational conflict of “Kids vs. their parents” to the low-budget brilliance of Wes Craven and the deeper messages embedded in 1980s horror films, this podcast episode offers a well-rounded analysis of the film that is sure to engage any movie-loving listener. Whether you're a seasoned horror fan or a newcomer to the genre, this episode provides valuable insights into why A Nightmare on Elm Street remains a significant piece of cinematic history.

If you're ready to dive deeper into the world of Freddy Krueger and the nightmares he brought to life, this podcast episode is a must-listen. So grab your headphones, settle in, and prepare to revisit one of the most terrifying films ever made, as seen through the lens of the Movie of the Year podcast.

This article aims to engage listeners who are fans of the film A Nightmare on Elm Street and enjoy exploring deeper themes in cinema through podcasts.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984Amadeus (with Katie Walsh!)The Movie of the Year podcast recently turned its attention to the iconic film Amadeus, offering listeners an in-depth analysis of this classic through an engaging conversation with guest critic Katie Walsh. Amadeus, directed by Milos Forman, is not just a retelling of Mozart’s life; it’s a rich exploration of genius, jealousy, and the complexities of talent. In this episode, the hosts and Walsh delve into the film's themes, focusing on what it means to have talent, the unique approach Milos Forman took to the musician biopic, and the unforgettable performances by Tom Hulce and F. Murray Abraham.

Exploring Amadeus: The Nature of TalentThe discussion begins with one of Amadeus’s central themes: the nature of talent. The hosts and Walsh explore how the film juxtaposes the extraordinary, almost divine talent of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart with the more modest abilities of Antonio Salieri. The podcast highlights how Amadeus portrays talent as both a gift and a curse, examining Salieri's agony as he recognizes Mozart’s genius, something he can admire but never replicate.

Katie Walsh brings an insightful perspective on how the film’s portrayal of talent transcends the musical realm and touches on broader human experiences. She notes that Amadeus raises questions about the fairness of life’s gifts and the torment that can arise from recognizing one’s limitations in the face of someone else’s brilliance. The conversation underscores how Amadeus resonates with anyone who has ever felt overshadowed by a more gifted peer, making it a timeless study of human emotion and ambition.

Milos Forman’s Amadeus: A Revolutionary Musician BiopicMilos Forman’s direction of Amadeus is another focal point of the episode. The podcast examines how Forman, already renowned for his work on One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, revolutionized the musician biopic genre with this film. Instead of crafting a straightforward biography, Forman created a lush, operatic drama that blends historical accuracy with artistic license, bringing Mozart’s world to life in a way that feels both authentic and larger-than-life.

The hosts and Walsh discuss how Forman’s approach to Amadeus differs from other musician biopics, particularly focusing on the rivalry between Mozart and Salieri. The film does not merely celebrate Mozart’s genius; it also delves into the darker aspects of his life and the intense envy it provokes in Salieri. This choice elevates Amadeus beyond a simple retelling of Mozart’s life, making it a profound exploration of human nature, power, and legacy.

Katie Walsh praises Forman for his ability to balance the film’s grand, operatic scale with intimate character studies, allowing audiences to connect with both the historical figures and the universal themes they represent. She points out that Forman’s direction ensures that Amadeus remains accessible and engaging, even for those who might not be familiar with classical music or Mozart’s life.

Tom Hulce and F. Murray Abraham in Amadeus: A Study in ContrastsNo discussion of Amadeus would be complete without acknowledging the outstanding performances of its lead actors, Tom Hulce and F. Murray Abraham. The podcast dedicates a significant portion of the episode to analyzing how these two actors brought Mozart and Salieri to life with such depth and nuance.

Tom Hulce’s portrayal of Mozart is described as both electrifying and tragic. The hosts and Walsh discuss how Hulce captures Mozart’s childlike exuberance, as well as his darker, self-destructive tendencies. Hulce’s Mozart is not just a musical genius but also a deeply flawed individual, and the podcast explores how this complexity makes the character so compelling.

F. Murray Abraham’s performance as Salieri is equally lauded. The podcast highlights how Abraham brings a quiet intensity to the role, conveying Salieri’s internal struggle between reverence for Mozart’s talent and bitter jealousy. Walsh notes that Abraham’s ability to express so much with just a glance or a slight change in tone is what makes his portrayal of Salieri so memorable. His performance turns Salieri into a tragic figure whose pain and resentment are palpable, making him a character that audiences can empathize with, despite his flaws.

The Movie of the Year podcast’s exploration of Amadeus, with guest Katie Walsh, offers listeners a fresh and insightful look at a film that continues to captivate audiences decades after its release. By examining the nature of talent, Milos Forman’s innovative approach to the musician biopic, and the powerful performances of Tom Hulce and F. Murray Abraham, the episode provides a deeper appreciation of what makes Amadeus a true cinematic masterpiece. For movie-loving podcast fans, this episode is a must-listen, shedding light on the timeless themes and artistic brilliance that have secured Amadeus’s place in film history.

Find other episodes of Movie of the Yearhere!

And our sister show, The Superhero Show Show, here!

Find Katie Walsh on Twitter @katiewalshstx, and look for her reviews on RottenTomatoes!

Follow PopFilter on YouTube @popfilterco and Instagram @yourpopfilter!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984Beverly Hills Cop (with Jordan Crucchiola!)Welcome back, dear listeners, to another thrilling episode of the Movie of the Year podcast! This week, we're diving into the high-octane, laugh-out-loud world of "Beverly Hills Cop." Yes, the 1984 action-comedy classic that catapulted Eddie Murphy to superstardom and made Detroit cops look infinitely cooler than they ever should. Buckle up as we explore the ins and outs of this cultural phenomenon, dissecting its themes, performances, and the genius behind its direction. And yes, we've got a guest panelist who is almost as excited as Eddie Murphy in a room full of bananas.

Eddie Murphy: The Iconic Axel FoleyFirst things first, let’s talk about the man, the myth, the legend: Eddie Murphy. If you think you know Eddie Murphy from his Saturday Night Live days, "Beverly Hills Cop" will make you realize you haven't even scratched the surface. His portrayal of Axel Foley is nothing short of legendary, blending sharp wit, raw charisma, and that signature laugh that could melt even the iciest of Beverly Hills hearts. Murphy's performance isn't just the centerpiece of the movie; it's the entire foundation upon which the film's success is built. How does he manage to be both a badass and a comedian at the same time? The answer lies in his unmatched talent, and maybe a little bit of Detroit street smarts.

Class and Race in Beverly Hills CopNow, let’s peel back the layers of "Beverly Hills Cop" and take a sardonic look at its take on class and race. This movie does more than just showcase Murphy's comedic prowess; it subtly critiques the cultural divide between Detroit's gritty streets and Beverly Hills' sanitized opulence. Axel Foley, a black detective from the working-class side of the tracks, waltzes into the epitome of white, upper-class America and turns it on its head. The film's commentary on race and class is as sharp as Foley’s one-liners, highlighting the absurdity and hypocrisy of the elite. It’s a comedy, sure, but the underlying social critique hits harder than a banana in a tailpipe.

Martin Brest: The Maestro Behind Beverly Hills CopBehind every great film is a director who orchestrates the chaos, and "Beverly Hills Cop" is no exception. Martin Brest, the unsung hero of this masterpiece, manages to blend action, comedy, and social commentary with a finesse that's as rare as finding a parking spot in Beverly Hills. Brest's direction ensures that the film never loses its pacing or charm, seamlessly transitioning from high-speed chases to hilarious exchanges without missing a beat. His vision turns a potentially standard cop movie into a groundbreaking film that still holds up decades later. How did he pull it off? Magic, genius, or just really good luck? Probably all three.

Guest Panelist Jordan Crucchiola Brings the HeatJoining us in this episode is none other than the brilliant Jordan Crucchiola. If you’re unfamiliar with Jordan, you’ve been living under a rock or in Beverly Hills without cable. As a seasoned film critic and pop culture aficionado, Jordan brings a fresh perspective to our discussion, dissecting "Beverly Hills Cop" with the precision of a surgeon and the enthusiasm of a kid in a candy store. Her insights into the film's cultural impact, particularly its portrayal of race and class, add an extra layer of depth to our already deep dive. Plus, her banter is almost as sharp as Axel Foley’s, making for an episode you don’t want to miss.

Wrapping Up the RollercoasterFrom Eddie Murphy's unforgettable performance to the film's biting social commentary, and the masterful direction of Martin Brest, this episode has it all. Thanks to our incredible guest, Jordan Crucchiola, for adding her razor-sharp insights to the mix. So, next time you watch "Beverly Hills Cop," remember, it's not just a movie; it's a comedic critique of societal norms wrapped in an action-packed, laugh-out-loud package. Join us next week for another wild ride into the world of cinematic excellence. Until then, keep watching those movies!

Check out Jordan's podcast, Feeling Seen, here!

Check out Ryan and Mike's other podcast, The Superhero Show Show, here!

View Details

Welcome to another electrifying episode of the Movie of the Year podcast! Today, we're diving into the vibrant world of Electric Boogaloo, the unforgettable sequel that cemented its place in the breakdancing movie hall of fame. Released in 1984, Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo captured the spirit and energy of the 1980s, becoming a cultural touchstone for dance enthusiasts and movie lovers alike. Join us as we explore the incredible dancing, standout acting performances, and poignant messages about life in the 1980s that this iconic film has to offer.

Special Guest: Andy Nelson from the Marvel Movie Minute does the Electric Boogaloo

We're thrilled to have Andy Nelson, co-host of the popular Marvel Movie Minute podcast, join us for this episode. Andy brings his expertise in film analysis and a deep love for 1980s cinema to our discussion. His unique perspective on Electric Boogaloo will offer listeners fresh insights into the film's choreography, narrative, and cultural significance. As a seasoned podcaster known for his engaging commentary on the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Andy's contributions to our conversation are sure to make this episode a must-listen for fans of dance films and 80s pop culture alike.

Dancing: The Heartbeat of Electric Boogaloo

At the core of Electric Boogaloo lies its spectacular dancing. As a breakdancing movie, it showcases the innovative and mesmerizing dance styles that defined the 1980s. The film's choreography is a visual feast, featuring gravity-defying moves and complex routines that left audiences in awe. We'll take you behind the scenes to discuss the creation of these iconic dance sequences, the talented dancers who brought them to life, and how Breakin' 2 set a new standard for dance films. Whether you're a seasoned dance aficionado or new to the world of breakdancing, this episode will give you a deeper appreciation for the artistry and athleticism that make Electric Boogaloo a timeless classic.

Acting Performances: Bringing Electric Boogaloo to Life

Beyond the dance floor, Electric Boogaloo boasts a cast of dynamic performers who infused the film with heart and charisma. We'll delve into the standout performances of Lucinda Dickey, Adolfo "Shabba Doo" Quinones, and Michael "Boogaloo Shrimp" Chambers, examining how their chemistry and dedication elevated the film. Their portrayals of Kelly, Ozone, and Turbo not only brought authenticity to the breakdancing scene but also captured the hopes and dreams of a generation. This segment will highlight the actors' journeys, their contributions to the film's enduring legacy, and how they inspired future generations of dancers and performers.

Message about Life in the 1980s: Beyond the Dance Moves of Electric Boogaloo

Electric Boogaloo is more than just a breakdancing movie; it's a snapshot of life in the 1980s. The film addresses themes of community, perseverance, and the fight against gentrification, reflecting the socio-economic challenges of the time. We'll explore how Breakin' 2 used its storyline to shed light on these issues, portraying the resilience and unity of the urban communities that gave rise to breakdancing culture. This discussion will offer insights into how the film's message resonated with audiences in the 1980s and continues to be relevant today.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984All of MeJoin Movie of the Year as we review All of Me with 80s TV Ladies, exploring Steve Martin & Lily Tomlin’s iconic performances in this classic screwball comedy.

Welcome to this week's episode of the Movie of the Year Podcast, where we delve into the intricacies of the classic film All of Me. Join us as we explore the film's unique blend of humor and heart, its standout performances, and its place within the broader landscape of screwball comedies. This episode features special guest panelists Sharon and Susan from the popular podcast 80s TV Ladies, bringing their expert insights into the mix.

The Performances of Steve Martin and Lily Tomlin in All of Me

In All of Me, Steve Martin and Lily Tomlin deliver unforgettable performances that elevate the film to comedic greatness. Martin's physical comedy and impeccable timing perfectly complement Tomlin's sharp wit and expressive range. Their dynamic chemistry drives the film, making every scene a masterclass in comedic acting. Sharon and Susan share their thoughts on how these two iconic actors brought their characters to life, blending humor with genuine emotion.

Screwball Comedies and All of Me

All of Me is a quintessential example of a screwball comedy, a genre characterized by its fast-paced dialogue, absurd situations, and sharp wit. We dive into the elements that make this film a standout within the genre, from its cleverly written script to its innovative use of physical comedy. Our panelists discuss how the film compares to other classic screwball comedies and why it continues to resonate with audiences today.

The Film's Treatment of Women in All of Me

A critical aspect of All of Me is its treatment of female characters, particularly the role of Lily Tomlin's character, Edwina Cutwater. In an era where many films relegated women to secondary roles, the movie offers a refreshing perspective by giving Tomlin a complex, central character with agency and depth. We analyze how the film handles gender dynamics and what it means for its place in film history. Sharon and Susan bring their unique perspective from 80s TV Ladies, highlighting the evolution of female representation in media.

Guest Panelists: Sharon and Susan from 80s TV Ladies

We're thrilled to have Sharon and Susan from the podcast 80s TV Ladies joining us this week. With their extensive knowledge of 1980s television and film, they provide valuable context and commentary on this film. Their podcast focuses on celebrating the contributions of women in 80s media, making their insights particularly relevant to our discussion on the film's treatment of female characters.

Find the 80's Tv Ladies website here!

And here they are on YouTube!

Thank you for tuning in to this episode of the Movie of the Year Podcast. All of Me remains a beloved classic, thanks to the outstanding performances of Steve Martin and Lily Tomlin, its roots in screwball comedy, and its progressive portrayal of women. We hope you enjoyed our deep dive into this iconic film and our conversation with Sharon and Susan from 80s TV Ladies. Stay tuned for more engaging discussions and analyses of your favorite films.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984The TerminatorWelcome to another exciting episode of the Movie of the Year podcast, where we delve into the films that have left an indelible mark on cinematic history. In this episode, our hosts take on the sci-fi classic The Terminator. With special guest Pete Wright from the Marvel Movie Minute, this episode promises a thorough and engaging discussion on one of James Cameron's most iconic works.

James Cameron: The Visionary Behind The TerminatorThe episode kicks off with an in-depth look at James Cameron, the mastermind behind The Terminator. Cameron's unique vision and storytelling prowess transformed a modestly budgeted sci-fi thriller into a groundbreaking cinematic experience. The hosts discuss Cameron's early career, his inspirations for the film, and how The Terminator set the stage for his future blockbusters.

Before The Terminator, James Cameron was relatively unknown in the industry. He started as a special effects artist and had a brief stint directing Piranha II: The Spawning. However, it was his work on The Terminator that showcased his potential as a filmmaker. Cameron's ability to combine technical skill with compelling storytelling became evident in this film, setting the tone for his future projects.

After The Terminator, Cameron's career skyrocketed. He went on to direct a series of highly successful and influential films. Aliens (1986) redefined the sci-fi horror genre, The Abyss (1989) showcased groundbreaking underwater effects, and Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) revolutionized special effects with its use of CGI. Cameron continued to push the boundaries of filmmaking with Titanic (1997), which won 11 Academy Awards, including Best Director, and Avatar (2009), which became the highest-grossing film of all time and introduced new standards in 3D technology and motion capture.

Pete Wright adds insightful commentary on Cameron's directorial style and his ability to blend intense action with thought-provoking themes. The hosts discuss how Cameron's vision and innovation have left a lasting impact on the film industry, making him one of the most influential directors of all time.

The Genre of The TerminatorNext, the conversation shifts to the genre of the film. The Terminator is often categorized as a sci-fi action film, but it also incorporates elements of horror and thriller. The hosts explore how the movie's genre-bending approach helped it stand out in the crowded 1980s film landscape. They discuss the film's innovative special effects, suspenseful narrative, and the seamless integration of futuristic concepts with a gritty, present-day setting. Wright offers a comparative analysis with other genre films of the era, highlighting what makes The Terminator a unique and enduring classic.

Iconic Scenes: Analysis and ImpactA detailed analysis of iconic scenes from The Terminator highlights their significance and impact. The scene where the Terminator first appears, emerging from a ball of lightning, sets the tone for the relentless, unstoppable force that Schwarzenegger embodies. The hosts discuss the famous "I'll be back" scene, where the Terminator crashes a car into the police station, showcasing the film's blend of suspense and action. Another standout moment is Sarah Connor's transformation from a terrified target to a determined survivor, exemplified in the final showdown in the factory. These scenes not only define the film but also have become ingrained in pop culture.

The Movie's Feelings Toward TechnologyA significant portion of the episode is dedicated to exploring The Terminator's complex relationship with technology. The hosts examine the film's portrayal of advanced AI and its potential threats to humanity, a theme that resonates even more today. They delve into the dichotomy of technology as both a savior and a destroyer, as embodied by the Terminator itself. Pete Wright brings in perspectives from contemporary tech developments, drawing parallels between the movie's cautionary tale and current technological debates.

Performances of Linda Hamilton and Arnold SchwarzeneggerNo discussion of The Terminator would be complete without highlighting the performances of Linda Hamilton and Arnold Schwarzenegger. The hosts praise Hamilton's portrayal of Sarah Connor, charting her character's evolution from a vulnerable waitress to a fierce warrior. They also dissect Schwarzenegger's iconic role as the Terminator, noting his physicality and the menacing presence he brought to the character. Wright shares anecdotes and behind-the-scenes stories about the casting choices and how both actors prepared for their roles, adding depth to their performances.

Audience Reactions and ReviewsThe hosts also explore the audience reactions and reviews from when The Terminator was first released, contrasting them with contemporary opinions. Upon its release in 1984, the film was praised for its innovative special effects, gripping storyline, and strong performances. Over the years, its reputation has only grown, with modern audiences appreciating its forward-thinking approach to technology and its influence on the sci-fi genre.

The Soundtrack: Setting the Tone and AtmosphereThe film’s soundtrack, composed by Brad Fiedel, plays a crucial role in setting the tone and atmosphere of The Terminator. The hosts discuss how the pulsating, electronic score enhances the film's tension and urgency, perfectly complementing the futuristic and dystopian themes. The iconic main theme, with its mechanical rhythm, has become synonymous with the Terminator character and the franchise as a whole.

Awards and AccoladesThe Terminator received several awards and accolades, further cementing its status as a classic. It won the Saturn Award for Best Science Fiction Film, and both Arnold Schwarzenegger and Linda Hamilton received praise for their performances. The film's groundbreaking special effects and innovative use of technology have been widely recognized and celebrated.

Conclusion: The Legacy of The TerminatorAs the episode draws to a close, the hosts reflect on the lasting impact of The Terminator. They discuss its influence on the sci-fi genre, its role in launching James Cameron's career, and its relevance in today's technology-driven world. Pete Wright wraps up the discussion with thoughts on how the film continues to inspire and entertain new generations of moviegoers and filmmakers alike.

Join us for this engaging episode of Movie of the Year, as we celebrate and analyze The Terminator, a film that has not only stood the test of time but also continues to shape the future of cinema. Be sure to check out related episodes of the podcast and explore more about The Terminator and James Cameron through our provided links. We encourage you to listen to the episode, share your thoughts, and discuss your favorite moments from The Terminator.

Links to Related Episodes and Resources:

• Movie of the Year 1991: Terminator 2: Judgment Day
• Pete Wright’s Marvel Movie Minute

Don’t forget to listen to this episode and share your thoughts with us. What are your favorite moments from The Terminator? How do you think the film's themes resonate today? Join the conversation and let's celebrate this iconic film together!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984The 1984 Action Figure Draft: The Exciting ConclusionWe've all been there: you and your friends open up your toybox and figure out a plan. How do you play with all of these action figures, all from different universes, intellectual properties, and power levels. It's draft time, baby!

Join Greg and Ryan, along with special guest stars Taylor and Nate, as the fearsome foursome sit down to each draft a team of action figures to battle against each other. The toy box they have to work with? All of 1984! The movies, the tv shows, the...politics? Mostly just movies and TV shows probably.

In order to create the team, the Taste Buds are fitting their characters into D&D roles, including Rogue, Ranger, Druid, Wizard, and Cleric!

Once a character gets drafted, nobody else from that movie can get picked, so tune in to see which Ghostbuster gets drafted. T-800 or Reese? Indy or Short Round? Paris or Texas? Which Gremlin? Which Eternia creature? Which member of the Miyagi dojo? Tune in and find out!

View Details

he 1984 Action Figure DraftWe've all been there: you and your friends open up your toybox and figure out a plan. How do you play with all of these action figures, all from different universes, intellectual properties, and power levels. It's draft time, baby!

Join Greg and Ryan, along with special guest stars Taylor and Nate, as the fearsome foursome sit down to each draft a team of action figures to battle against each other. The toy box they have to work with? All of 1984! The movies, the tv shows, the...politics? Mostly just movies and TV shows probably.

In order to create the team, the Taste Buds are fitting their characters into D&D roles, including Rogue, Ranger, Druid, Wizard, and Cleric!

Once a character gets drafted, nobody else from that movie can get picked, so tune in to see which Ghostbuster gets drafted. T-800 or Reese? Indy or Short Round? Paris or Texas? Which Gremlin? Which Eternia creature? Which member of the Miyagi dojo? Tune in and find out!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984Paris, TexasWelcome to the Movie of the Year podcast, where we delve into the most impactful and iconic films that have graced the silver screen. In this episode, we turn our attention to "Paris, Texas," a masterful work by the acclaimed director Wim Wenders. Join us as we explore the depths of this 1984 classic, examining its intricate storytelling, poignant characters, and the indelible mark it has left on American cinema.

Wim Wenders and the American MovieWim Wenders, a visionary filmmaker known for his profound explorations of human emotion and the human condition, brings a unique European perspective to the American landscape in "Paris, Texas." Wenders' fascination with the vastness and desolation of the American Southwest is evident in every frame of this film. We'll discuss how Wenders' direction transforms the barren landscapes into a character of its own, reflecting the inner emptiness and quest for redemption faced by the protagonist, Travis.

In this segment, we dive into Wenders' cinematic techniques, including his use of long takes, natural lighting, and wide-angle shots. We'll also explore how "Paris, Texas" fits into the broader context of Wenders' oeuvre and the New German Cinema movement, which sought to challenge traditional narratives and offer new perspectives on familiar themes.

The Introduction of Travis, Paris, Texas' Anti-HeroThe heart of "Paris, Texas" lies in the enigmatic character of Travis Henderson, portrayed by Harry Dean Stanton in a career-defining performance. The film opens with Travis wandering the desert, mute and disheveled, setting the stage for a journey of rediscovery and reconciliation.

We'll analyze the powerful introduction of Travis, a man lost both physically and emotionally. This section will cover how the film slowly peels back the layers of Travis' past, revealing his fractured relationships and deep-seated guilt. The subtlety in Stanton's performance, combined with Sam Shepard's poignant screenplay, invites viewers to empathize with Travis' silent anguish and root for his redemption.

The Final 20 Minutes of Paris, TexasThe climax of "Paris, Texas" is both heartbreaking and hopeful, encapsulating the film's central themes of love, loss, and redemption. In the final 20 minutes, Travis' journey comes full circle as he reconnects with his estranged wife, Jane, played by Nastassja Kinski.

We'll delve into the emotionally charged reunion between Travis and Jane, set in a peep-show booth—a symbolic space of separation and connection. This segment will examine the raw, unfiltered dialogue and the haunting score by Ry Cooder that underscores this pivotal moment. We'll also discuss how this climax offers a resolution that is both bittersweet and deeply satisfying, leaving a lasting impact on the audience.

"Paris, Texas" is more than just a film; it's a profound meditation on the complexities of human relationships and the quest for personal redemption. Wim Wenders' masterful direction, coupled with standout performances and a hauntingly beautiful soundtrack, makes this film a timeless piece of American cinema.

In this episode of the Movie of the Year podcast, we've explored the many facets of "Paris, Texas," from its cinematic brilliance to its emotional depth. We hope our discussion has deepened your appreciation for this extraordinary film and its enduring legacy.

Thank you for joining us, and stay tuned for more deep dives into the movies that have defined our times. Until next time, happy watching!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984The Karate Kid(with Adam Kempenaar from Filmspotting!)In a riveting episode of the "Movie of the Year" podcast, the panel dives deep into the beloved 1984 classic, "The Karate Kid." With guest panelist Adam Kempenaar, the host of the renowned podcast Filmspotting, this episode offers a comprehensive exploration of the film's enduring appeal. Through detailed discussions, the episode examines the intricate relationship between Daniel and Mr. Miyagi, the directorial vision of John G. Avildson, and the thematic clash of Eastern and Western philosophies that defines the movie.

The Bond Between The Karate Kid's Daniel and Mr. MiyagiCentral to "The Karate Kid" is the heartwarming and transformative relationship between Daniel LaRusso, played by Ralph Macchio, and Mr. Miyagi, portrayed by Pat Morita. The podcast panel, with Kempenaar's insights, delves into how this dynamic serves as the film's emotional core. They discuss how Daniel, a teenager struggling to adapt to his new life in California, finds an unlikely mentor in Mr. Miyagi, a quiet and wise karate master.

Kempenaar highlights the authenticity and depth of their bond, noting how Mr. Miyagi's unconventional training methods—such as the iconic "wax on, wax off" routine—teach Daniel more than just karate. These lessons instill discipline, patience, and resilience, ultimately shaping Daniel's character and helping him face his bullies, particularly Johnny Lawrence of the Cobra Kai dojo. The discussion underscores how their relationship transcends a typical mentor-student dynamic, evolving into a profound friendship that resonates with audiences to this day.

The Vision of Director John G. AvildsenJohn G. Avildsen, the director of "The Karate Kid," is celebrated for his ability to craft inspirational underdog stories, a skill he honed with the Academy Award-winning "Rocky." The podcast explores Avildson's directorial approach, which brings a unique blend of grit and sentimentality to the film. Kempenaar and the panelists discuss Avildson's talent for creating emotionally charged narratives that are both realistic and uplifting.

Avildson's meticulous attention to character development and storytelling is a focal point of the conversation. The panel appreciates how he captures the nuances of Daniel's journey and Mr. Miyagi's mentorship. They also highlight Avildson's skill in choreographing the film's fight scenes, which are not only thrilling but also imbued with deeper philosophical undertones.

Eastern vs. Western Philosophies in The Karate KidA significant theme in "The Karate Kid" is the clash between Eastern and Western philosophies. This thematic conflict is intricately woven into the narrative, contrasting the peaceful, introspective teachings of Mr. Miyagi with the aggressive, results-driven mentality of the Cobra Kai dojo. The podcast episode delves into how this cultural juxtaposition is portrayed and its impact on the characters and story.

Kempenaar provides an insightful analysis of how Mr. Miyagi embodies Eastern principles such as balance, humility, and inner peace. In contrast, the Cobra Kai, led by the ruthless Sensei Kreese, represents a Western emphasis on competition and dominance. The discussion examines how these differing philosophies influence Daniel's growth and the film's resolution, with Daniel ultimately embracing Miyagi's teachings to triumph in the All-Valley Karate Championship.

Adam Kempenaar’s Perspective on The Karate KidGuest panelist Adam Kempenaar brings a fresh perspective to the podcast, enriching the discussion with his extensive knowledge of film history and analysis. As the host of Filmspotting, Kempenaar is adept at dissecting cinematic elements and contextualizing them within broader cultural and artistic frameworks. His contributions to the episode are particularly valuable in exploring the deeper meanings and lasting legacy of "The Karate Kid."

This episode of the "Movie of the Year" podcast offers a thorough and engaging exploration of "The Karate Kid," guided by the expertise of Adam Kempenaar. Through a detailed examination of Daniel and Mr. Miyagi's relationship, John G. Avildson's directorial vision, and the film's thematic clash of Eastern and Western philosophies, the discussion highlights why "The Karate Kid" remains a timeless classic. For movie podcast fans, this episode is a must-listen, providing rich insights and a deeper appreciation of a film that continues to inspire generations.

Make sure to check out Filmspotting here! And follow Adam on Instagram and Letterboxd.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension (with Matt Singer!)Explore the cult classic "Buckaroo Banzai" with the Movie of the Year podcast, featuring Matt Singer. Dive into genre, performances, and the film's lasting message.

In this exciting episode of the Movie of the Year podcast, we dive into the cult classic "The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension." Released in 1984, "Buckaroo Banzai" is a film that defies conventional genres and has garnered a dedicated fanbase over the years. Join our hosts along with special guest panelist Matt Singer, renowned film critic and editor at ScreenCrush, as they explore the unique charm and enduring legacy of this eclectic movie. Whether you're a long-time fan or new to the world of Buckaroo Banzai, this episode promises a blend of insightful analysis and lively discussion.

Does Buckaroo Banzai Even Have a Genre?"Buckaroo Banzai" is a genre-bending adventure that combines elements of science fiction, action, comedy, and even a touch of romance. Our panel delves into how the film's genre-defying nature contributes to its unique identity and cult status. We discuss the creative vision of director W.D. Richter and writer Earl Mac Rauch, who crafted a story that challenges traditional genre boundaries and offers something truly distinctive in the realm of 1980s cinema.

How are the Performances in Buckaroo Banzai?The film boasts a remarkable ensemble cast led by Peter Weller in the titular role of Buckaroo Banzai, a multi-talented scientist, neurosurgeon, and rock musician. Matt Singer provides an in-depth look at Weller's charismatic performance, along with standout contributions from co-stars Jeff Goldblum, John Lithgow, and Ellen Barkin. Our hosts highlight how the actors' committed portrayals add depth and humor to the film, enhancing its appeal and making it a timeless piece for movie enthusiasts.

Does This Movie Have a Message?Beyond its quirky plot and memorable characters, "Buckaroo Banzai" offers a surprisingly profound message about heroism, innovation, and the power of teamwork. The panel examines the film's underlying themes, exploring how Buckaroo Banzai and his eclectic band of adventurers, the Hong Kong Cavaliers, embody ideals of courage and collaboration. We also discuss how these themes resonate with contemporary audiences, making the film relevant even decades after its release.

Guest Panelist: Matt SingerWe are thrilled to feature Matt Singer in this episode, bringing his extensive knowledge and passion for cinema to our discussion of "Buckaroo Banzai." As an acclaimed film critic, Matt offers unique perspectives on the film's impact and its place in movie history. His insights help illuminate why "Buckaroo Banzai" remains a beloved cult classic and a topic of fascination for film scholars and fans alike.

This episode of the Movie of the Year podcast offers a thorough exploration of "The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension," celebrating its genre-defying brilliance, outstanding performances, and enduring message. With expert analysis from our hosts and special guest Matt Singer, listeners are in for an engaging and informative journey through one of the most unconventional films of the 1980s. Be sure to check out our other episodes for more deep dives into iconic movies that have left a lasting impact on the world of cinema.

For more episodes of Movie of the Year, plus our sister show The Superhero Show Show, don't forget to visit our official podcast website and follow us on Instagram and YouTube.

Plus, explore more of Matt Singer's reviews and articles on ScreenCrush. Buy his brand new book, Opposable Thumbs: How Siskel and Ebert Changed Movies Forever on his website here!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984Stop Making SenseDive into Stop Making Sense with Movie of the Year 1984. Explore David Byrne's star power, Jonathan Demme's genius, and the art of reviewing concert films.

Stop Making Sense: A Journey Through the Best Concert Film Ever

Hey there, movie podcast lovers! Welcome to another episode of Movie of the Year 1984, where we dive into the greatest films of that spectacular year. Today, we’re talking about a film that’s more than just a movie; it’s a full-blown sensory experience. Yes, we’re talking about Stop Making Sense. Get ready to explore how to review a concert film, the irresistible star power of David Byrne, and the wild career of the legendary director Jonathan Demme.

How to Review a Concert Film: The Stop Making Sense BlueprintSo, how does one review a concert film like Stop Making Sense? Reviewing a concert film isn’t like reviewing your typical narrative feature. It’s about capturing the essence of the live performance and translating it into a cinematic experience. For Stop Making Sense, the key elements are energy, atmosphere, and the sheer magnetic presence of the performers.

Start with the energy. From the opening notes of "Psycho Killer," where David Byrne appears with an acoustic guitar and a boombox, you can feel the electricity in the air. Each song builds on the previous one, creating a crescendo of sound and emotion that pulls the audience deeper into the experience.

Next, consider the atmosphere. Jonathan Demme’s direction turns the concert into an immersive event. The minimalist stage design and dramatic lighting create a sense of intimacy, making viewers feel like they’re right there with the band. The camera work is meticulous, capturing not just the performance but the raw emotion and sweat of the moment.

The Star Power of David Byrne: The Man Who Makes It All Make SenseDavid Byrne, the frontman of Talking Heads, isn’t just performing in Stop Making Sense—he’s creating an indelible persona. Byrne’s quirky dance moves, intense facial expressions, and distinctive voice make him a captivating presence. He’s not just singing songs; he’s embodying them, making every note and every movement count.

Byrne’s eccentricity is epitomized by the now-iconic big suit. It’s more than just a quirky costume choice; it’s a statement. The oversized suit, coupled with Byrne’s exaggerated movements, creates a surreal visual that’s both humorous and thought-provoking. It’s a perfect metaphor for the outsized nature of performance and fame.

The Wild Career of Jonathan Demme: From Concerts to CannibalsJonathan Demme’s career is a wild ride through different genres and styles. Before he directed Stop Making Sense, Demme had already made a name for himself with films like Melvin and Howard. But Stop Making Sense showcased his ability to bring a concert to life on the big screen in a way that had never been done before.

Demme approached the concert film with the eye of a narrative filmmaker, focusing on storytelling through visuals and rhythm. His later films, like The Silence of the Lambs and Philadelphia, would further cement his reputation as a master director. But in Stop Making Sense, we see Demme at his most innovative, turning a live performance into a piece of cinematic art.

Why Stop Making Sense Makes Perfect SenseStop Making Sense isn’t just a concert film; it’s an immersive experience that captures the magic of live performance and the genius of its creators. With David Byrne’s magnetic presence and Jonathan Demme’s visionary direction, the film transcends the concert genre, becoming a timeless piece of art.

So, if you’re a fan of movie podcasts and you haven’t yet experienced Stop Making Sense, do yourself a favor and watch it. Let Byrne’s quirky charm and Demme’s directorial brilliance sweep you off your feet. And remember, sometimes the best things in life happen when you start making sense.

Until next time, keep those movie discussions alive and stay tuned for more episodes of Movie of the Year 1984!

View Details

In the "Movie of the Year: 1984" episode, Melinda Clarke and CG Mirich from the "Beyond the OC" podcast help the Taste Buds dive into Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, exploring its thrilling genre, the dynamic chemistry between Harrison Ford and Kate Capshaw, and the film's controversial cultural portrayals. They blend humor and critical analysis, offering fans of movies and "The OC" an engaging and insightful discussion. The episode balances appreciation for the film's adventurous spirit with a thoughtful examination of its problematic elements, making it a must-listen for both longtime fans and new viewers.

View Details

In the "Movie of the Year: 1984" episode, Melinda Clarke and CG Mirich from the "Beyond the OC" podcast help the Taste Buds dive into Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, exploring its thrilling genre, the dynamic chemistry between Harrison Ford and Kate Capshaw, and the film's controversial cultural portrayals. They blend humor and critical analysis, offering fans of movies and "The OC" an engaging and insightful discussion. The episode balances appreciation for the film's adventurous spirit with a thoughtful examination of its problematic elements, making it a must-listen for both longtime fans and new viewers.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984Ghostbusters (with Conor Kilpatrick)Can Ghostbusters bust its way into our 1984 Movie of the Year?

Bustin' has been said to make one recording artist "feel good." But is the busting of ghosts enough to center an entire feature film around? A very intelligent question, but ultimately a foolish one because this was the most successful movie of 1984 and maybe all time. If it has been a long time since you have seen this movie, do yourself a favor put it on right now. In fact, even if you have seen this movie recently, put it on.

I won't wait, but do it.

With a movie as good as Ghostbusters, we're going to need to call in a guest, Conor Kilpatrick of the podcast iFanboy, to make sure we don't miss any of the angles. We suss out whether or not this movie is still scary to us before jumping into whether it is still funny to us. We also hash out what this movie says about the politics of the early 80's, so don't miss this opportunity to finally figure out what this podcast thinks of one Ronny Reagan!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984Mixtape Part OneJoin the 'Movie of the Year' podcast as the panelists create the ultimate 1984 mixtape in 'Mixtape Part 2.' Discover the top hits, iconic tracks, and hidden gems of 1984 in this engaging and informative episode. Perfect for music lovers and 80s enthusiasts!

Introduction: Crafting the Ultimate 1984 MixtapeIn this riveting episode of the "Movie of the Year" podcast, join us as we delve into the vibrant world of 1984's music scene with "Mixtape Part 2." Our panelists come together to create the ultimate 1984 mixtape, capturing the essence of a year filled with iconic tunes. Whether you're a music aficionado or a nostalgic 80s lover, this episode is packed with engaging discussions, memorable tracks, and a trip down memory lane that will leave you humming along.

Creating the Perfect 1984 PlaylistIn "Mixtape Part 2," our panelists work tirelessly to curate a playlist that embodies the spirit of 1984. Using their deep knowledge of music and personal anecdotes, they select tracks that not only defined the year but also continue to resonate with audiences today. From chart-topping hits to underground gems, our team ensures the 1984 playlist is both comprehensive and exhilarating.

Panelist Picks: Curating the Playlist 1984Our diverse panel brings a variety of perspectives to the table as they debate and deliberate over which songs make the cut. With spirited discussions and passionate defenses of their choices, the creation of the 1984 hit songs playlist becomes an entertaining and informative process. Each panelist shares their unique insights, highlighting why these tracks are quintessentially 1984.

Highlighting Iconic Tracks for the 1984 MixtapeThroughout the episode, the panelists spotlight several standout songs that are must-haves on any 1984 mixtape. They dive into the stories behind the hits, the cultural impact of the music, and the artists who made 1984 an unforgettable year in music history. Listeners will gain a deeper appreciation for these tracks and perhaps discover new favorites along the way.

Conclusion: The Final Cut of Our 1984 Hit Songs PlaylistAs the episode draws to a close, the panelists present their final 1984 mixtape, a carefully curated playlist that encapsulates the sound and spirit of 1984. This playlist 1984 is a testament to the enduring legacy of the year's music and a gift to listeners seeking to relive or discover the magic of 1984's hits. Tune in to "Mixtape Part 2" and let the music take you back in time.

Join the ConversationDon't miss out on this engaging episode of the "Movie of the Year" podcast. Whether you're here for the nostalgic vibes or to expand your musical horizons, our 1984 mixtape is sure to delight. Share your favorite 1984 tracks with us and join the conversation using our social media channels. Let's celebrate the music that made 1984 a year to remember!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984Mixtape Part OneWe are making a mixtape of all the best 1984 jams in our 1984 Mixtape Part One!

Mixtapes are so important. But it could be argued that they were even more important in 1984. This was the time of the tape, baby. Cassets as far as the eye could see. To celebrate how important mixtapes were in 1984, we are doing something we almost never do except for every season: we are making a mixtape to celebrate a great year in music.

We only think about movies here on Movie of the Year (well, and sometimes years), and so we've been on top of highlighting all the great movies of 1984, but we would be remiss (a fireable offense here) not to mention that this might also be one of the best years in music history...wait, Music of the Y—nah, that'd never work.

However, a mixtape of the best 1984 tunes surely would, which is why we invited friends taylor and Nate to come get this done!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984Gremlins (with Nate)Can Gremlins transform into our 1984 Movie of the Year?

Picture a Gremlin. I'll wait. OK, so what you pictured was a Mogwai, which is why it's so important that we made this episode to help remind people of the particulars of Gremlins and the rules and such.

In 1984, we learned that mankind—and to a lesser extent, womankind (thanks for the misogyny, 1984!)—was not ready for the Mogwai yet. I am assuming after forty years, we have done what it takes to be worthy of these little guys. No?

We had to bring in friend of the show Nate to help us get to the heart of matters such as these. We also get into whether this movie might be better if one of the Gremlins was an elegant, sexual woman? Perhaps in a little Gremlin bikini? Let's run it up old the flagpole and see which Gremlins salute.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984Once Upon a Time in America (with Keith Phipps)Can Once Upon in America take the title of our 1984 Movie of the Year?

Once Upon a Time in America is a movie of epic scope even though it is the tale of small-time crooks trying to screw each other over to make it out of the gutter. (And one guy lives in Buffalo for like decades.) This contrast is just one of many artfully nestled into one of the harder watching experiences we've had on this show. And we've seen American Beauty. Multiple times. Ugh.

Joining us will be very special guest Keith Phipps, an actual writer with actual opinions on movies, unlike normal panelists Greg and Mike, dullards of the highest order. Keith has contributed to Rolling Stone, Slate, The Daily Beast, GQ, and The Verge, which c'mon that's cool. He is here to help us get into how this movie fits into the canon of great gangster movies. We will also discuss the special relationship between Noodles and Maxie before covering the often-upsetting, and very confusing, portrayal of romance and sexuality in the movie.

Be sure to check out Keith's upcoming book, The Age of Cage, a look at Hollywood through the singular cinematic experience that is Nicolas Cage. And check out Keith's podcast, The Next Picture Show!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984This Is Spinal TapCan This Is Spinal Tap rock its way to the title of our 1984 Movie of the Year?

This Is Spinal Tap put rock music on the map. Before this movie came out, no one was really sure what to make of this new music genre. Enter Spinal Tap. With hubris, unparalleled talent, and a penchant for dramatically losing drummers, Spinal Tap changed music, and the movie about them, This Is Spinal Tap, put the new band and their wholly original sound into the national conversation.

This movie is considered a classic of both rock and comedy, but does it actually rock? Is it actually funny? We've been known to take down classics before, so this might be another time where we speak truth to power.

Coming up this season we have some of the most fun movies we've covered and some of the most amazing guests we've ever hosted. Stay tuned, everyone, because things are just getting started.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984Repo ManCan Repo Man take the title of our 1984 Movie of the Year?

In the early 80’s, UCLA film student Alex Cox wanted to move from student films to features. Remaking his student film by the same name, Repo Man would have a budget of 500 grand and be filled with punk rockers. Enter Michael Nesmith, everyone's least favorite Monkee. At the time, Nesmith’s pockets were flush with that sweet liquid paper money, so he, along with universal, decided to turn Repo Man into a real movie. Well…as real as it turned out to be.

Repo Man tells the story of Otto, a young punk who has nothing going for him in post-apocalyptic Edge City. The apocalypse here, however, doesn’t come after a bomb has dropped, or zombies have attacked. This is after the apocalypse created by voting in conservatives (boo; furthermore, hiss). Otto takes a job as a repo man, and suddenly has a purpose, a mentor, and a girlfriend. Everything would probably end slightly less than fine if it wasn’t for a Chevy Malibu barreling towards our characters.

Coming up this season we have some of the most fun movies we've covered and some of the most amazing guests we've ever hosted. Stay tuned, everyone, because things are just getting started.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

We choose our sweet 16; which 16 movies will make our 1984 season?

It is time to pick the movies we will be covering in our 1984 season! Yes, it's our sweet 16. Which movies will make up this year? A weary world demands to know. Well, fear not because we are here to deliver to you the movies that will make up the season that will consume the next three months of our lives (and we assume yours; the podcast has been getting some impassioned emails lately).

We love movies and we love years, so we came together to make this podcast celebrating both. 1984 may have been a big year for movies; however, we're betting it's going to be an even bigger year for our podcast.

Coming up this season we have some of the most fun movies we've covered and some of the most amazing guests we've ever hosted. Stay tuned, everyone, because things are just getting started.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1984A New Season BeginsA new season begins, which movie of 1984 will be our Movie of the Year?

1984 is here, and folks, this might be the biggest year of blockbusters we've ever covered. None of us were really very aware in the actual year 1984—we are young, and fit—but the movies of this year would pepper our childhoods like salt, adding flavor and enjoyment to everything we consumed.

But were these movies just fast food for the mind? No, along with the blockbusters of 1984 were smaller, more thoughtful films that perhaps could have been even better with a couple more 'splosions. Rock me, Amadeus, indeed.

We love movies and we love years, so we came together to make this podcast celebrating both. 1984 may have been a big year for movies; however, we're betting it's going to be an even bigger year for our podcast.

Coming up this season we have some of the most fun movies we've covered and some of the most amazing guests we've ever hosted. Stay tuned, everyone, because things are just getting started.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year2023 Movie of the YearOur 2023 Movie of the Year bracket is here to pick the most filmic moments of 2023!

Movies are the books of watching things. A lot of people don't want to watch a movie because, on some level, all movies are about the how we will never escape death and loss. Does that apply to this slate of films? Please allow me to laugh for one hundred years at that question.

But there is no time to laugh for 100 years—I would die before I ever finished. And it would interfere with all the great movies from 2023. A sleepy little movie called Barbie came out this year, and right alongside it released a big bomb, Oppenheimer. I'm just messin. Bomb not in the box-office sense, but rather the bomb at the center of the movie. We loved Anatomy of a Fall and Zone of Interest (both just a normal amount), but did we like them enough for either to win Movie of the Year? You'll have to/get to listen to find out!

They made 'em; you maybe watched 'em; we'll rank 'em.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Our 2023 Best TV Drama bracket is here to pick the best dramatic moments of 2023!

Drama, aren't we meant to save it for our mamas? But this bracket of brave shows asks the question, "Is that a real question?" No, no it isn't. TV drama is for when you want to put on something that isn't comedy, but you are afraid of movies because they are too much like books. These TV dramas are here to let us know that not all drama has to be smart, well-written, original, entertaining, bracket-worthy, or good, really, like at all.

The state of TV dramas is pretty bad right now, but that doesn't mean there aren't a few epic stand outs. And you can't say epic stand out without immediately thinking of Blue Eye Samurai. This show is so profoundly beautiful in one moment, and then it is devastating and disgusting in the next. Another great show is Succession, which went out on top, still serving us our delicious boar on the floor. However, that show is gone forever now.

But can it win in its last year of life? Let's see, won't us?, as we take a stroll through the TV dramas of the year 2023.

They made 'em; you watched 'em; we'll rank 'em.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year2023 Best AlbumOur 2023 Best Album bracket is here to pick the best musical moments of 2023!

John Album, inventor of the album, was heard to remark one day, "There should be a playlist where all the songs are by one artist, and all songs on this playlist-ish thing should be released at the same time, in a track order of the artists' choosing!" We know, of course, that John Album was driven into the wilds of the Texas panhandle for his beliefs, but no one can doubt he changed the world.

It took albums a long time to catch on, but they have finally made a name for themselves and made the legend of John Album one that we still tell the kiddos late on Album Day's eve. 2023 had no shortage of these bespoke playlists, many of them from artists I could name.

And so I will: boygenius came out with an album so good they had to call the CD the record. Caroline Polacheck made a name for herself with Desire, I Want to Turn Into You. And Mitski did the dang thing with her own album, False Lankum. No, wait, that one was from the band Lankum. But you get the idea.

They made 'em; you listened to 'em; we'll rank 'em.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year2023 Best Horror Our 2023 Best Horror bracket is here to pick the best scary movie of 2023!

Horror movies, are they too scary? Yes, they are too scary and also too awful; however, some people seem to like them. But can watching them ever be enough? No, it is important that we do more than watch them—we must judge them, and having judged them, we must set them to fight against one another.

If you had all the baddies in this fighting it out, you would probably have to go with the big lizard who loves Eddie Izzard, Godzilla. This might just be head canon, but I have always felt that Godzilla was a huge fan of Eddie Izzard. Who isn't though?

They made 'em; you watched 'em; we'll rank 'em.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year2023 TV Comedy of the Year Our 2023 TV Comedy of the Year show will pick the best TV comedy of the year 2023!

Comedy has always been so important to us here at Pop Filter. But we always felt a little sheepish about that because comedy has often been thought of as a garbage genre for trash people. This might be finally turning around though with what a great year for TV comedy 2023 has been. But only one can be our TV comedy of the year, and this show is where we make that choice.

Can Barry thrash The Bear? Where will Beef be served up? It's our duty to be the jury for this and maybe that will give the edge to Jury Duty.

This contest could go to any of these fine shows. All we can say for sure is the winner is...America.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year2023 Mixtape Our 2023 mixtape contains all the bangers and bops of 2023!

Click here to listen to the playlist!

A mixtape is a sacred, holy thing. Young guns will call them playlists, but young guns aren't even old enough, or wise enough, to know about the hit film Young Guns. You couldn't make Young Guns today, because of woke, but you could probably reboot it, because no more ideas.

But enough about mixtapes; let's get to why we are really here: the tale of adventure, friendship, and betrayal in the old west: Young Guns. No, wait. Opposite, opposite. OK, time to get back on track.

What do Emilio Estevez, Lou Diamond Phillips, and Kiefer Sutherland all have in common? That's right, they love our 2023 playlist, and they encourage you to share it with your friends!

So come along and listen to the best dang mixtape you ever did hear!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year2023 Century of the Year The 2023 Century of the Year show covers the 100 biggest pop culture moments of 2023!

Century of the Year is the only time when we can come together and discuss the year in pop culture. What were the 100 biggest pop culture moments of 2023, and how did they change the world? Pop culture is the most important part of life, and yet we so rarely hear anyone talking about it. It's all war or the latest fascist turn the country is taking. That's Obama's America, people!

But we are here to right the ship. We plan to get America talking about the one thing that matters in this world: the 100 wackiest moments of 2023, a truly bonkers year.

How wild did things get in 2023? Well, a lady wore a dang moon on her head in a beauty pageant, folks. Not enough for you? Okay, we finally also got a peak into Taylor Swift's love-life when she began to date unknown sports enthusiast, Travis Kelce. We had Barbenheimer, M3gan, Pedro Pascal as Daddy, and so much more.

Some come along and listen to the year that was!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year2023 BOTY Movie Preview Show The 2023 BOTY Movie Preview Show covers all the great movies of 2023!

We have talked about the rest, now let's talk about the best: films. It is movietime, folks, and that means we have to call in the big guns—friends of the pod Kate and Nate (no relation)—and start voting movies off the island. No human being can watch sixteen movies, and so we have to do the painful act of cutting eight loose right away. Luckily, we are good friends, so there is no way this could threaten our rock-hard friendships.

By the time this episode is done, we'll have eight movies left. One of those movies WILL be our 2023 Movie of the Year!

We used to do this for fun. Then, it was for the entertainment. Eventually, we came to do it for ourselves.

But now? Now, we do it to destroy each other.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

The 2023 BOTY Preview Show covers all of our upcoming Best of the Year episodes!

The year 2023 has drawn to a close. But before we can say goodbye to it forever, we need to decide what were the best media of the this remarkable year. However, 16 movies, 16 TV dramas, 16 TV comedies, 16 albums, 55 burgers, and 55 fries is way too much for us to comment on meaningfully with our trademark penerative wits. So we are giving ourselves an opportunity to cut those 16 down to a more manageable 8 each, except for the burgers and fries.

In this episode we tackle the TV and the albums. TV is something you put on to look at your phone when you are at home; albums are what you put on to look at your phone when you are out in the world, so they make a natural pair.

We used to do this for fun. Then, it was for the entertainment. Eventually, we came to do it for ourselves.

But now? Now, we do it to destroy each other.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

In the 2024 Oscar Draft, we draft the movies of 2023 to see who can get the most Oscar nominations!

We have seen the movies of 2023. Now, it is time to make our picks for which we think will get the most Oscar nominations. Not wins here, people: nominations. A blockbuster movie like Barbie or Oppenheimer is liable to get upwards of ten noms. That's the kind of movie you want to pick in a draft like this. Each panelist will have four rounds to pick their Oscar nomination squad, but here's the thing, the other panelists are going to be making picks too. (Personally I hate this part, but they assure me it's important.)

You want to hit the big money with a movie that gets high single-digit or even double-digit nominations, but you also want rounds three and four to bring you in a couple of nom dogs at least. It's these late rounds where it is usually won—by the likes of Ryan—or lost—by the likes of everyone else (mostly Greg), except for Books.

We used to do this for fun. Then, it was for the movies. Eventually, we did it for ourselves.

But now? Now, we do it to destroy one another.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Finale Part ThreeOn the 1973 Finale Part Three we we are down to four movies, one of which is our 1973 Movie of the Year!

By the time you have finished listening to 1973 Finale Part Three, you will know 1973's Movie of the Year. 1973 was a fine year at the movies. Maybe it's not the powerhouse we anticipated. But looking at the remaining movies—Coffy, Don't Look Now, Mean Streets, and The Exorcist—it's clear that, no matter which wins, a titan of film is surely being proclaimed. Any of these movies could win it, which is why it has often been called, "The Most Unpredictable Night in Hollywood."

Also, we give out some of our most-coveted awards because we love winners here. So join us, won't you, as we say goodbye to 1973. And hello to our newest winner of Movie of the Year!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Finale Part TwoOn the 1973 Finale Part Two we continue to whittle down our sixteen-movie bracket, closing in on our 1973 Movie of the Year!

It all comes down to almost this, but then just a little bit more after this. A lot of times the second part of a trilogy is the best part. Think about it: Empire Strikes Back, The Last Jedi, Attack of the—uh, Godfather II.

Last week saw eight movies become four, and this week we see that happen once again. And, of course, our famous Mooties, awards fit for any occasion.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

On the 1973 Finale Part One we start to whittle down our sixteen-movie bracket, closing in on our 1973 Movie of the Year!

It is the beginning of the end of our 1973 season of Movie of the Year. We have watched the movies. We have participated in the science. Ryan and Mike did a lot of screaming. All that is left to us to do is begin to make these pieces of art square off against each other, Gladiator (2000).

But it's not all just carnage on this one: we are also giving out our coveted Mooties. Every Hollywood Dream ends with holding one of these awards, staring into the light. How did you get here? What is this award made of—it's so oddly warm. Whose voice is that, congratulating you for winning?

All that and more!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

This week we discuss American Graffiti! Can this movie drive its way to our 1973 Movie of the Year?

Cars, they mean so much to us here in America. Americans love car so much that some have even taken to living in them. There are many images that scream America: Frat Boys drunk chanting USA; a gun being fired into the air after a sporting event win or loss; or simply a small child without healthcare coverage.

but perhaps nothing Bellows America quite like the automobile. in a way it's a shame that cars have nearly completely whoopsied the environment, but in another way it's kinda beautiful, once our mothers and nurturers, they have now transformed into our destruction.

American Graffiti Embraces the awesome power and the unparalleled majesty of the automobile. It's not simply something that takes us from one place to another, it is a place, an interior, the site of our hopes and our dreams and the sodas we spill right in our silly laps.

By a guy who's only claim to fame is the entire Star Wars universe and thus half of my personality, American Graffiti explores a time where things were a little bit simpler, but the world she was changing. folks are graduating and new opportunities pull our young characters thither and yon.

but if you look closely, and I hope after tonight's episode You Will, you’ll see that there's one very special, perhaps unnoticed character in this movie: That's right America herself. And I guess graffiti; although I don't actually remember there being any graffiti in this movie let alone enough to necessitate being half the title.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

This week we discuss Coffy! Can this movie blast its way to our 1973 Movie of the Year?

Coffy is 91 minutes long…so there you go folks, our 1973 Movie of the Year, for being nearly the conically perfect runtime. We can just run the award over to Ms. Grier’s house any time. Literally anytime.

Coffy is a simple nurse until her little sister is preyed upon by local drug-selling enthusiasts. Seeking revenge, she finds she has a knack for sort of disassociating and entering a dreamlike state where she is hyper-violent, ruthless, and—it must be said—very cool. Watching this movie makes you feel very American.

Over the glorious 91 minutes Coffy, both film and character, swing wildly in tone and focus, going from comically gratuitous nudity, to looney tunes style violence, to emotionally devastating scenes of people fruitlessly begging for their lives or being dragged to death behind a car.

At the center of the tornadic violence, nudity, race commentary, gender messaging, shotguns, and tears is Pam Grier. 1973 Pam Grier is on the short list of the most beautiful women to ever exist, and the other women on the list are just different years of Pam Grier.

The camera loves Pam Grier, the podcast loves Pam Grier, but Gene Siskel called her performance wooden and awkward. Is this vile calumny to stand? We get into it!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Don't Look NowThis week we discuss Don't Look Now! Can this movie chase its way to our 1973 Movie of the Year?

After losing their daughter Christine to an accidental drowning, Laura and John Baxter relocate to Venice, Italy so he can restore an old, and somehow fake(??), church. But while there, they encounter a couple of odd sisters, one of who seems to have the gift of second sight. They tell Laura that the late Christine is still with them and this news hits the couple in two very different ways.

Laura is suddenly happy and exploring the worlds of spiritualism and religion, but John is skeptical despite the fact that he seems to be having visions of his own of a figure very much like his daughter, moving through the allies of Venice.

But John’s visions do nothing to diminish his skepticism and this leaves him half blind as he tries to reconcile his existential certainty with his quite hope that he can reconnect with his daughter. But when he gets close to doing this, boom it’s a creepy old lady instead and she slits his throat.

Grief really is complex!

The movie is iconic, but is it scary? And do we remember the right parts of it? Also, what does it say about the horrors of precognition? We get into it!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Enter the DragonThis week we discuss Enter the Dragon! Can this movie fight its way to our 1973 Movie of the Year?

Enter the Dragon follows Lee, played by Bruce Lee, a shaolin monk who must leave the monastery and make his way to an island with no pistols and no guns. He must enter a fighting tournament to reclaim the honor of his family and his temple, and he has to do all this for under a million bucks.

He manages to win the tournament and defeat all opponents, even a guy who keeps replacing his hand with things less helpful than a hand. But he isn’t alone. Joining him are Roper, a washed up gambler down on his luck, but with more than enough skill to hold his own. And Williams an unconventional fighter whose character was rewritten to die because the guy playing Roper didn’t want his character to be the one who died.

Is the action elevated? Can Bruce Lee be the most iconic star we have ever featured? Is this movie the best? We get into it!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Action Figure Draft, Pt 2The Taste Buds finish up their draft of the action figures of 1973! And then it's time to fight!

It's that time again. That time of the year where we forget all of the depth and subtlety that is used to tell the stories of our favorite 1973 characters, and instead focus on one thing: how they're going to kick your ass. Join your host Greg, along with his little buddy panelists Ryan and Taylor, as they take turns drafting what they think would make the ultimate 1973 action team.

Instead of going by film genres, like in the past, they are instead drafting characters to fit into six Dungeons and Dragons slots, where they try to find Tanks, Wizards, and...the rest! Will the Six-Million Dollar Man be taken off of the table? How long until someone takes the ultimate 1973 superhero, Bruce Lee? And which panelist will be the first to throw a tantrum, and why is it always Ryan?

Tune in to listen to the panelists bring all of their 1973 pop culture knowledge to the table, as they ask such interesting questions as "Is Pazuzu a Wizard or a Tank?" or "Why do you suck so much, Taylor?"

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Action Figure Draft, Pt 1Get the toy boxes out, because we're having an all-out action figure war on Movie of the Year!

It's that time again. That time of the year where we forget all of the depth and subtlety that is used to tell the stories of our favorite 1973 characters, and instead focus on one thing: how they're going to kick your ass. Join your host Greg, along with his little buddy panelists Ryan and Taylor, as they take turns drafting what they think would make the ultimate 1973 action team.

Instead of going by film genres, like in the past, they are instead drafting characters to fit into six Dungeons and Dragons slots, where they try to find Tanks, Wizards, and...the rest! Will the Six-Million Dollar Man be taken off of the table? How long until someone takes the ultimate 1973 superhero, Bruce Lee? And which panelist will be the first to throw a tantrum, and why is it always Ryan?

Tune in to listen to the panelists bring all of their 1973 pop culture knowledge to the table, as they ask such interesting questions as "Is Pazuzu a Wizard or a Tank?" or "Why do you suck so much, Taylor?"

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973The Harder They ComeThis week we discuss The Harder They Come! Can this movie play its way to our 1973 Movie of the Year?

Set in Jamaica, The Harder They Come is a drama about an aspiring singer, Ivan, desperate for fame who, disillusioned by corruption in every part of daily life, becomes involved in some reefer madness.

Unfortunately, that trade is controlled by the same group of jerks that run everything else in this movie and really the world. It’s just always these jerks that mess everything up.

Anyway. Ivan’s life spirals as a result, but his fame grows and grows. The worse he is, the more people want to listen to his songs or throw cans at his enemies. But he breaks pretty bad in the end and goes on something of a killing spree until he is gunned down by the army who dishonorably refuse his offer of single combat.

We get into it!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973The ExorcistThis week we discuss The Exorcist! Is this movie diabolical enough to be our 1973 Movie of the Year?

The Exorcist is our biggest 1973 movie. It was the most popular then; it’s the most popular now; it made the most money; it got hella noms; and it has a lasting cultural impact that is as big if not bigger than any other movie we have covered on this show, let alone in the sleepy little year 1973 turned out to be.

It’s a fun little romp about growing up. Our bodies change and we become host to new desires we never had before. In the end, those around us feel like they hardly know us anymore and we may have killed a director, one of the biggest crimes in 1973.

A demon from Iraq possesses a little girl and tortures her in a race against the medical establishment and Catholic church to see who can mess her up the most. A conflicted priest is finally able to cast the demon out/accept the demon into his own soul and then save the day with a little autodefenestration.

Is this movie doing too much? Is it really that scary? And is it a feminist masterpiece, or yet another misogynist dud? We get into it!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973The Last DetailThis week we discuss The Last Detail! Can we swear this is our 1973 Movie of the Year?

The Last Detail is a movie about three sailors, who are on their way to deliver one of the trio to jail. But thanks to some clever thinking ahead, they are able to secure a little time for a boys trip! Now we know here at Pop Filter that nothing is more sacred than a boys trip.

Thankfully, The Last Detail is a movie that understands the sanctity of dudes being dudes being dudes being dudes. We got ourselves a little drinking, a little underwear semaphore, a bit of fighting marines (booo) in a bus stop bathroom, and even a little trip to the old cat house.

Along the way, the boys tour more than just the eastern seaboard, they explore the depths of masculinity, individuality, and duty in the world that may be corrupt and ridiculous, but ultimately must be obeyed. The last detail aims to tell a story that is not grand or sweeping or epic, but instead is quiet small yet somehow perhaps still epic.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Last Tango in ParisThis week we discuss The Last Tango in Paris! Can a movie this uncomfortable to talk about be our Movie of the Year?

Last Tango in Paris is the story of Paul, an extremely recently widowed man whose relationship with his wife was complicated, and Jeanne, a 19 year old who comes to find herself completely dominated and enthralled by him. Meeting by chance one day, they enter into a sexual relationship in which their first encounters are totally anonymous and pretty upsetting to at least one viewer.

Jeanne is both parts repulsed and drawn to Paul, and she is also seeing Tom, a young, boring film maker, who seems to think you can do whatever you want if you're making a movie at the same time. Jeanna becomes increasingly desperate to flee from Paul as he becomes increasingly sure that he is in love with her until she shoots and kills him. But all this has been largely lost in the cultural memory of this movie, replaced by one scene where Paul rapes Jean using butter as lubricant.

Speaking of the infamous scene, actress Maria Schneider later said “They only told me about it before we had to film the scene and I was so angry. I should have called my agent or had my lawyer come to the set because you can't force someone to do something that isn't in the script, but at the time, I didn't know that." She has also said that this scene traumatized her and stole her youth.

Is it possible to reckon with this scene and the damage it caused and then move past that to also say anything meaningful about the movie?

Would this scene kinda ruin the movie even without it hurting Schneider as it did?

We get into it.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973The Long GoodbyeThis week we discuss The Long Goodbye! Can this film solve the case of what should be our Movie of the Year?

Director Robert Altman said he wanted Phillip Marlowe to wake up in the 1970’s, a man out of time, and just wander through the twists and turns of The Long Goodbye. Eliot Gould seems to have taken this to heart because he crafted the wanderen-est performance in the history of Hollywood.

We start with him waking up at 3AM and heading to his kitchen, and he never loses the energy of someone stumbling around in their robe and slippers, trying to remember what exactly it is they’re supposed to do at this time, muttering about how nothing is where it should be and how no one keeps this place nice anymore.

Slouching through southern California and parts of Mexico, Marlowe truly travels the highs and lows of 1970s masculinity while sort of shrugging at women and muttering to himself, “It’s ok by me.” All while trying to separate friend from foe and being haunted by a titular song.

All that, and Books is on the show!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what's best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn't be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don't Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Mean StreetsThis week we discuss Mean Streets! Are these mean streets tough enough to become our Movie of the Year?

Mean Streets is principally about three characters. We have Michael—the wanna-be gangster who is trying to will himself to fit into a world of crime that he doesn’t seem ready for yet, what with getting himself easily scammed and perpetually disrespected. Then there is Johnny Boy who we first see blowing up a mailbox for absolutely no reason. We quickly learn this is the least offensive act of his in the entire film and probably the most sensible. Last, there is Charlie—sweet, sweet Chaz—the sensitive boy who tries to hold the world together even though it is shattered, contradictory in the extreme, and destined to blow apart in a paroxysm of violence.

We discuss how Mean Streets serves as an introduction into the early career of Scorsese, we take a closer look at the career of Harvey Keitel, and we talk about some of the hottest boys 1973 had to offer.

All that, and Nate is on the show!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Paper MoonThis week we discuss Paper Moon! Can it rise high enough to become our Movie of the Year?

Paper Moon is a fun little romp about a shady guy and his daughter, seamlessly played by a shady guy and enemy of the show, Ryan O’Neal, and his real-life 10-year-old daughter, Tatum O’Neal, with whom he has always had a strained relationship. We spend most of the show getting into the why’s, the no, really why’s, and the man, but really, like why’s of this decision, but let’s somehow put this aside for now.

The movie itself follows a conman and his maybe/probably daughter as they scam their way across the Midwest, which is basically destroyed and depopulated by a sad-sounding thing called the Depression. Shot in black and white and an obvious love letter to old timey stories, Paper Moon is constantly walking the line between charming and bleak.

We discuss the legacy of the film and whether it is possible to love it despite the pain it caused. Also, we do a little trivia and assemble a team of 1973 Pro-Stars.

All that, and Taylor is on the show!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

This week we discuss Robin Hood! Can it steal the gold and become our Movie of the Year?

Robin Hood is about a fox everyone wants to get with even though he hasn’t even kissed his own girlfriend. But here’s something cool about him: he shoots arrows real good and takes money from the rich to give to the poor by reusing old footage and fleshing out the runtime with a series of looping chase scenes.

With half the characters being from England and half being from the American south, Robin hood allows us to imagine a fantasy land where public domain characters move through something approximating a story, while we all hold our breath hoping this isn’t one of those super-racist old Disney movies featured in some multi-episode podcast.

In what can only be described as a series of scenes falling in more-or-less chronological order until each has played, we see Robin hood go from a guy in the forest, to a guy in an archery tournament, to a guy in a bunch of weird outfits, to a guy in a bunch of people’s fantasies.

All that, and we breath into the mic a lot!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973SerpicoThis week we discuss Serpico! Can it take the cash and become our Movie of the Year?

Serpico asks the question, what if it turned out that cops weren't always the good guys? Now, try to stay with me because this is probably going to blow your mind a little bit, but the cops in Serpico aren’t concerned with making the world a better place or with protecting the little guy (pause here to allow the reader to go, "Say what?" and scratch their noggin). Instead, they focus on draining money from everything and everyone they come in contact, relocating said money safely into their own pockets. Hard to believe, but it’s right in the film, folks.

I assume this movie is a fiction film? I am being told the movie is not a fiction film.

In this one, we discuss how Serpico handles its depiction of corrupt cops before we dive into Al Pacino and his performance (and wardrobe). Is it more hoo-hah or pee-you-hah, does that scan? That doesn't scan. Does he act good or not good, I mean. And you know the three of us are not going to miss an opportunity to shed some light on Lumet.

All that, and we breath into the mic a lot!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973SistersThis week we discuss Sisters! Is this movie bonkers enough to become our Movie of the Year?

Sisters is many things: creepy, funny, campy, doing it for themselves. It follows the struggle of two women to make it in this wacky world. One, Grace Collier, is an intrepid reporter for the Staten Island Panorama, trying to get a scoop, the other is model and aspiring actress Danielle Brenton, who is trying to have it all while not having all her marbles.

After a simple misunderstanding causes Danielle to go a little wacky and kill her recent date, Grace gets pulled into the story she was always hoping for. But she is doing a lot less reporting on the story and a lot more being the very center of it before long.

Is Danielle the killer? Or is it her nutty sister, Dominique? It turns out the sisters used to be joined at the hip, literally, but now Dominique—the evil one, since that is science—is back and stabbier than ever. Also involved is a creepy looking, and therefore obviously evil, ex husband/mad scientist/guy who brings a book to sit in the audience of a TV show?? Too freaky.

What happens next is kind of anyone’s guess as the movie gives way to madness, hypnotism, dream sequences, and a string of names that can only be the people who made the movie.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973SistersThis week we discuss Sisters! Is this movie bonkers enough to become our Movie of the Year?

Sisters is many things: creepy, funny, campy, doing it for themselves. It follows the struggle of two women to make it in this wacky world. One, Grace Collier, is an intrepid reporter for the Staten Island Panorama, trying to get a scoop, the other is model and aspiring actress Danielle Brenton, who is trying to have it all while not having all her marbles.

After a simple misunderstanding causes Danielle to go a little wacky and kill her recent date, Grace gets pulled into the story she was always hoping for. But she is doing a lot less reporting on the story and a lot more being the very center of it before long.

Is Danielle the killer? Or is it her nutty sister, Dominique? It turns out the sisters used to be joined at the hip, literally, but now Dominique—the evil one, since that is science—is back and stabbier than ever. Also involved is a creepy looking, and therefore obviously evil, ex husband/mad scientist/guy who brings a book to sit in the audience of a TV show?? Too freaky.

What happens next is kind of anyone’s guess as the movie gives way to madness, hypnotism, dream sequences, and a string of names that can only be the people who made the movie.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Mixtape, Pt. 2The Taste Buds finish up their epic 1973 playlist!

When we last left our Taste Bud Triumvirate, they were butt-deep in the music of 1973. Now it's time to get all of the way deep. Join Greg, Ryan, and Taylor as they continue to create their mixtape live on the air.

Ryan has the closing song, and is waiting for his chance to end the whole thing. Will his song be stolen and used earlier in the mixtape? Will Taylor attempt to get another Steely Dan song onto the playlist? And will Greg be able to manage these two harebrained hairballs and still host a show? Tune in to find out!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Mixtape, Pt. 1The Taste Buds begin their journey to put together the greatest playlist in the history of 1973!

It's time to take a break from all of these MOVIES and start talking about some music! Join Greg, Ryan, and Taylor as they try to put together the perfect playlist, live on air. Be there as they take turns picking songs, and arranging the order. Will this be a rockin and rollin good time, or will the threesome make it a total bummer and terrible to listen to? It'll be the first one!

Taylor has the opening song, and kicks off the playlist with a fair amount of controversy. Will Ryan and Greg put up with his selection? Will they throw the song, and the chooser of the song, off the show? Tune in to find out!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at

View Details

This week we discuss The Sting! Does this con-man mix-em-up have enough beneath the surface to become our Movie of the Year?

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973WestworldThis week we discuss Westworld! Does this sci-fi/western have enough firepower to become our Movie of the Year?

Westworld is a lot of things: cool, well-known, probably about 45 minutes too long. It tells the story of the eponymous Westworld (go to heck Romanworld and Medievalworld) a place for adults to put on costumes and play cowboy with their friends. Maybe intercourse a few robo-ladies together like pals.

As the Go-Go’s tell us: Vacation, all I ever wanted; vacation, had to get away. But did they also not teach us: Vacation, meant to be spent all alone. Ominous.

Conceived of after writer-director Michael Crichton looked at a Pirates of the Caribbean automaton that could raise and lower its hand and say “shiver me timbers,” and got all spooked, thinking, “my god what is stopping this perfect machine from killing me, writer-director Michael Crichton,” Westworld is about an amusement park gone bonkers.

The robots, whose job it is to get banged and murdered, freak out for some unexplained reason and start killing guests. One of these robots, played by Yul Brynner, kills Christian Bale, played by James Brolin, and then stalks 1973 superstar Richard Benjamin through the entire park. And if that sounds interesting, you’re right, it sounds super interesting. Even now, I’m like, this movie must be interesting, right?

Many are surprised to hear that Michael Crichton not only wrote this movie but directed it as well. Was having such an inexperienced director the greatest idea? Does it show at all in the movie? We also explore Westerns and their influence on/by masculinity. And, of course, we cover Yul "Be Sorry" Brynner.

All this AND the stuff that I forgot because I need to go get in a line to fill my car up with gas! Thanks a lot, current president, Richard Nixon!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

Abortion is healthcareWhile Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5...

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Introduction Part 2In our 1973 Introduction Part 2 we pick the 16 movies that will make up our season bracket!

By the time you are done listening to this episode, you will know the sixteen movies that will make up our 1973 season. Hidden among those movies, still unknown to all of humanity, is the actual 1973 Movie of the Year itself! It's hard to believe that one day we will feel exhausted with the effort of completing this season, because right now it is full of so much fresh promise. Like the 70s themselves, this season is chock full of the feeling that anything is possible.

Even though there is a ninety percent chance that The Exorcist is gonna lock this one down. If it makes it, no spoilers.

Just a reminder, this is 1973 and the groovy seventies have STARTED. The bass-forward music, the neckerchiefs, the sudden zooms! You have NEVER seen zooming like this. A generation of directors that can only be called Zoomers (you guys I think I just invented a cool new term here.)

All this AND the stuff that I forgot because I need to go get in a line to fill my car up with gas! Thanks a lot, current president, Richard Nixon!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1973Introduction Part 1What wonders and horrors will the 1973 Introduction Part 1 unleash on our delicate brains?

Wow, 1973. Let me start by saying, congratulations. And, you're welcome. And, we are so sorry. 1973 was 50 years ago y'all, and it's the ancientiest season we've ever done. Much has changed since these dimly remembered times. Unfortunately, when you look back 50 years, half the stuff has changed, but it's actually changed for the better and then back for the worse again. We are overturning landmark social movements from this time, people!

But still things were weird in 1973. By our own way of counting decades here at Movie of the Year, 1973 is basically the first true year of the 70s, because the first couple years of any decade tend to seem much more like the time that preceded them. Think of your ultimate picture of the 60s. That is exactly what 1970 looked like. Do the same with the 50s; you'll find it holds up.

However, this is 1973 and the freakin seventies have started. The music, the hair, the cameras' sudden zooming! You have NEVER seen zooming like this. A generation of directors with what can only be called the zoomies (you guys I think I just invented a cool new term here.)

All this AND the stuff that I remembered but then also remembered doobies!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Catch Me If You CanCan Catch Me If You Can con its way to our 2002 Movie of the Year?

Catch Me If You Can is a Steven Spielberg joint, so you know we are going to get rowdy on this one. Steve Spiels has meant so much to the show. An early Hall of Fame inductee, one of the most important voices from our childhood, and a talented filmmaker to boot, this guy has got it all goin on as far as we are concerned. But does that mean this particular movie, Catch Me If You Can, is any good? Hmmmm.

And when it comes to star power, you know this movie delivers, serving up Leo and a side o' Hanx! (Can someone put a chef's kiss emoji here?-Greg) However, do these guys create synergy, or do we simply get two strong, parallel performances? If I answered that here, I could get fired, but listen to the show because you probably should know.

And it wouldn't be an episode of Movie of the Year without as jawing about ladies. Boys. Love. Ladies. But do they? Or do they love the idea of ladies that culture has tried to hallucinate into existence? Dunno!

And you know we have a sack full of awards to bestow! All this AND the stuff that I remembered but then remembered the writers' strike!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Finale Part ThreeIt is time to finish picking 2002's Movie of the Year in our 2002 Finale Part Three!

We work really hard on each of the seasons of this show. We do it because it means a lot to us and because that is what the movies deserve. The 2002 season was even more work than we usually do—it was intense. Yet, here we are, at the end of it, and it's hard not to be just a little sad. 2002 was a bonkers year and the movies are full of a sense of overwrought pride and mounting, undirected aggression. The movies are fun but sometimes in a way that seems manic. A smiling face turned away from a burning house.

But we need to move on. A new season awaits us, full of promise, movies, and lost episodes. As we turn out the lights on this season, we say goodbye to some of our favorite films. Who can forget the pure entertainment of Chicago? The pluck and artistic courage of Russian Ark? And I know we will never forget all the things we said about this season's very special lost episode recipient, Unfaithful.

And you know we have a sack full of Mooties to bestow! All this AND the stuff that I remembered but cheekily neglected to mention!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where...

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Finale Part TwoIt is time to continue picking 2002's Movie of the Year in our 2002 Finale Part Two!

As we discussed last time, fifteen great movies (and, yes, one stinkeroo) made their way into the sweet sixteen. And now it is time to take that number DOWN. To an even LOWER NUMBER. There are a lot to pick from, so you figure it out. Lookin' at you, eight; feels like you're on deck.

Maybe Bourne Identity will do some of his cool spy stuff and make his way to the last part of our finale. 25th Hour might come in and take down some strong competition in a way we'll never forget. And The Two Towers might remind us why there is only one lord when it comes to our rings. And it's not just the movies that can win and lose because we are giving out our podcast-famous Mooties as well, celebrating the best in performance, artistry, and being a huge, huge jerk.

All this AND the stuff that I remembered but cheekily neglected to mention!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And...

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002The Finale, Pt. 1It is time to start picking 2002's Movie of the Year in our 2002 Finale Part One!

It seems like just yesterday we started the 2002 season, but as they say: time flies when your castin' pods. This year we embraced just how many movies there are in any given year. Because there are so many, we opened up our brackets (and our hearts) to 16 movies.

I know what you are thinking, you must have just opened up the floodgates and invited all the stinkeroos to the party along with the usual eight brilliant movies. However that is not what happened; seven great movies (and just one stinkeroo) made their way into the sweet sixteen. And now it is time to take that number DOWN.

Maybe Battle Royale will slay the competition and move on to the next round. Perhaps Spider-Man (yeah just the one, kinda weird) will web-sling his way on. Personally, I could see Morvern Callar slicing up the competition. And it's not just the movies that can win and lose because we are giving out our podcast-famous Mooty awards as well, celebrating the best in performance and artistry.

All this AND the stuff that I forgot to mention!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Morvern CallarIs Morvern Callar too obvious a choice to become 2002 Movie of the Year?

Stop any yahoo on the street and ask them to bleat out a movie from 2002 and the first one that is going to spring into 90% of their brains is Morvern Callar. MorvernMania was everywhere is 2002, and if you don't remember that, don't let on because it's deeply strange and it might indicate that you are secretly a weirdo.

In this episode we really get into what makes the titular Movern tick, probably more than any other episode we have done (so far). Why does she make the choices she makes, and what are we to think of her behavior? Probably it's fine, to be honest. You gotta let women hack up the bodies they're gonna hack up. If they have to explain every little thing to you, none of the parts of this body are going to get buried in the woods.

And how about director-writer Lynne Ramsay? We discuss what she brings to this meticulously paced experience. Also, we look at how the movie tackles issues of class, gender, and truth. That's just one segment where we tackle those, and I promise, they stay tackled by the time we're done.

All this AND the stuff that I forgot to mention!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has...

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Lord of the Rings: The Two TowersCan The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers unite all our panelists and become 2002 Movie of the Year?

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is a movie that asks, "What if our enemies are actually so bad that we can do whatever we want to them and even treat it like a little game?" We probe what director Peter Jackson brought to this project that only he could before we delve into the difficulties of telling the second part of a three part story. But we do eventually shift gears to ask ourselves what this movie says about the struggle of good versus evil, how that message resonated in 2002, and what it means to us now in the enlightened year of 2023.

Also, we build a mountain of Rushmore 2002 babies, struggle through some arduous The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers trivia and then hand out awards like it's nobodies business, which it isn't, dad!

All this AND the stuff that I forgot to mention!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

View Details

Movie of the Year: 200225th HourCan 25th Hour capture the title of our 2002 Movie of the Year?

25th Hour may be a bit of a forgotten gem of 2002, but it is a gem nonetheless. With Rosario Dawson, Edward Norton, Philip Seymore Hoffman, and Barry "That's-Right-It's-Me" Pepper, the movie has star power to burn. And when your motion picture is directed by one Mr. Spike Lee, you are going to get the Taste Buds' attention.

We focus on both Lee and Norton in this episode, giving each a segment. And you couldn't talk about this movie without reckoning with the impact 9/11 had on its production and general vibe, so we take the opportunity to reminisce about how pop culture in general processed 9/11.

Of course, no discussion of this film would be complete without a little time spent talking about gross dudes [Can someone (else) figure out how to make it play "Let's Hear It for the Boys" here??-Greg]. Is this movie celebrating them? Excoriating them? We break it down! We break down so many things!

All this AND the stuff that I forgot to mention!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002ChicagoCan Chicago sing, dance, shoot, and prance its way to our 2002 Movie of the Year?

This week our movie is 2002's musical sensation, Chicago, a movie that has a little something for everyone. Whether your thing is sexy ladies, violent outbursts, or Richard Gere, Chicago has got you covered. But does it have enough about it that is 2002 enough to take down film's greatest achievement? Oh brother do we get into it, as well as discussing if casting stars was a better idea than casting more experienced singers and dancers. We also discuss the staging of the musical numbers and whether the choices made worked for us, or worked us into a rage.

All that and we also construct a Rushmore of 2002 musical acts, and soft launch a new segment called Mikey Likes, where Mike talks about his personal favorite city-titled movies. All that and probably a few things I forgot, on this week's Movie of the Year!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 19911991 Action Figure DraftWhat can the action figures of 1991 teach us about the Avengers of 1991? Our 1991 Action Figure/Avengers Draft decides!

We were recently cleaning out the PopFilter Vault, and look what we found! An unaired episode from our 1991 season--enjoy!

Drafting—it's what separates us from the animals. Well, except for the West African Drafting Camel. It's OK, go look it up: they're really quite cute. Back? OK!

When we're compulsively drafting things around our plush, existent studio, we ask ourselves what we are really looking for in our draftees. For this lost 1991 season episode, we were looking for the best action figures of 1991, either real or imagined, and we were drafting them into teams of Avengers. It's a concept so simple, clean, and uncluttered as to obviate further explanation.

But what were we looking for? Action figures that made 1991 the epic year it was. Mutants who were ninjas dealing with the struggles of being teenagers who were also turtles. Robots who dreamt of being cars, planes, or even a boomedbox. Other, different, robots who dreamt of killing the savior of mankind, pitted against those who dreamt of saving him. We draft until one of us literally flees the studio crying because we love our listeners more than we could ever love each other.

Then we vow never to lose the episode. And, if we somehow should lose the episode, we vow to find it and publish it at a time in the future, convenient to our release schedule.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Adaptation.Does Adaptation. have the flexibility to be our 2002 Movie of the Year?

After years of struggling to adapt Susan Orlean’s The Orchid Thief into a movie, Charlie Kaufmann wrote himself and his fictional twin Donald into the movie and made it about his struggles with adapting the book. He only told his friend Spike Jonez his new direction, and was sure he would be done with the industry but didn’t see another way out. The result is Adaptation, a meditation on obsession and writer’s block starring Meryl Streep as the fictionalized Orleans and Nick Cage in a fat suit playing the pathetic Kaufman twins.

The Taste Buds discuss what the film says about storytelling, why the character of Donald Kaufman is necessary, and what director Spike Jonze does to leave his mark on a movie that feels very dedicated to its writer.

Plus, they build a Mount Rushmore to 2002 trends, partake in a bit of Adaptation trivia, and give out some coveted awards!

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Punch-Drunk LoveDoes Punch-Drunk Love have the strength to be our 2002 Movie of the Year?

The podcast hosts start by discussing the overall quality of Punch-Drunk Love. They highlight which stuff stood out as being particularly innovative or effective at creating emotion, and which ones fell flat. They also discuss any notable trends or themes that emerged within their viewing of Punch-Drunk Love.

The hosts then dive deeper into some of the individual things, providing their own reviews and critiques. They discuss the plot, characters, performances, cinematography, and overall atmosphere of each picture or whatever, as well as any standout moments or parts of the film that stuck with them.

Throughout the episode, the hosts also touch on broader topics related to the movie, such as the role of drama in society, the psychology of identity, and the ways in which appreciation of the film has evolved over time.

Ultimately, a "Movie of the Year" podcast episode about 2002's best movies aims to provide listeners with a comprehensive overview of the year's dramatic offerings , as well as thoughtful insights and analysis from knowledgeable and passionate hosts.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 20022002 Avengers DraftWe take some time away from picking the 2002 Movie of the Year to pick our 2002 heroes in a 2002 Avengers Draft!

The podcast hosts start by discussing the overall quality of 2002 action properties. They highlight which stuff stood out as being particularly innovative or effective at creating excitement, and which ones fell flat. They also discuss any notable trends or themes that emerged within their viewing of Russian Ark.

The hosts then dive deeper into some of the individual characters, providing their own insights and critiques. They discuss the plot, characters, performances, cinematography, and overall atmosphere of each picture or whatever, as well as any standout moments or parts of the film that stuck with them.

Throughout the episode, the hosts also touch on broader topics related to the movie, such as the role of drama in society, the psychology of identity, and the ways in which appreciation of the film has evolved over time.

Ultimately, a "Movie of the Year" podcast episode about 2002's best movies aims to provide listeners with a comprehensive overview of the year's dramatic offerings , as well as thoughtful insights and analysis from knowledgeable and passionate hosts.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Russian ArkRussian Ark has one shot to be our 2002 Movie of the Year!

The podcast hosts start by discussing the overall quality of Russian Ark. They highlight which stuff stood out as being particularly innovative or effective at creating emotion, and which ones fell flat. They also discuss any notable trends or themes that emerged within their viewing of Russian Ark.

The hosts then dive deeper into some of the individual things, providing their own reviews and critiques. They discuss the plot, characters, performances, cinematography, and overall atmosphere of each picture or whatever, as well as any standout moments or parts of the film that stuck with them.

Throughout the episode, the hosts also touch on broader topics related to the movie, such as the role of drama in society, the psychology of identity, and the ways in which appreciation of the film has evolved over time.

Ultimately, a "Movie of the Year" podcast episode about 2002's best movies aims to provide listeners with a comprehensive overview of the year's dramatic offerings , as well as thoughtful insights and analysis from knowledgeable and passionate hosts.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 200224 Hour Party PeopleDoes 24 Hour Party People have what it takes to be our 2002 Movie of the Year?

The podcast hosts start by discussing the overall quality of 24 Hour Party People. They highlight which stuff stood out as being particularly innovative or effective at creating emotion, and which ones fell flat. They also discuss any notable trends or themes that emerged within their viewing of 24 Hour Party People.

The hosts then dive deeper into some of the individual things, providing their own reviews and critiques. They discuss the plot, characters, performances, cinematography, and overall atmosphere of each picture or whatever, as well as any standout moments or parts of the film that stuck with them.

Throughout the episode, the hosts also touch on broader topics related to the movie, such as the role of drama in society, the psychology of identity, and the ways in which appreciation of the film has evolved over time.

Ultimately, a "Movie of the Year" podcast episode about 2002's best movies aims to provide listeners with a comprehensive overview of the year's dramatic offerings , as well as thoughtful insights and analysis from knowledgeable and passionate hosts.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Minority ReportDoes Minority Report have a future being our 2002 Movie of the Year?

The podcast hosts start by discussing the overall quality of Minority Report. They highlight which stuff stood out as being particularly innovative or effective at creating emotion, and which ones fell flat. They also discuss any notable trends or themes that emerged within their viewing of Minority Report.

The hosts then dive deeper into some of the individual things, providing their own reviews and critiques. They discuss the plot, characters, performances, cinematography, and overall atmosphere of each picture or whatever, as well as any standout moments or parts of the film that stuck with them.

Throughout the episode, the hosts also touch on broader topics related to the movie, such as the role of drama in society, the psychology of identity, and the ways in which appreciation of the film has evolved over time.

Ultimately, a "Movie of the Year" podcast episode about 2002's best movies aims to provide listeners with a comprehensive overview of the year's dramatic offerings , as well as thoughtful insights and analysis from knowledgeable and passionate hosts.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002The Bourne IdentityDoes The Bourne Identity have enough memorable moments to be our 2002 Movie of the Year?

The podcast hosts start by discussing the overall quality of The Bourne Identity. They highlight which stuff stood out as being particularly innovative or effective at creating emotion, and which ones fell flat. They also discuss any notable trends or themes that emerged within their viewing of The Bourne Identity.

The hosts then dive deeper into some of the individual things, providing their own reviews and critiques. They discuss the plot, characters, performances, cinematography, and overall atmosphere of each picture or whatever, as well as any standout moments or parts of the film that stuck with them.

Throughout the episode, the hosts also touch on broader topics related to the movie, such as the role of drama in society, the psychology of identity, and the ways in which appreciation of the film has evolved over time.

Ultimately, a "Movie of the Year" podcast episode about 2002's best movies aims to provide listeners with a comprehensive overview of the year's dramatic offerings , as well as thoughtful insights and analysis from knowledgeable and passionate hosts.

• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 20222022 Best Thing of the YearIt's time for the bracket to determine what is the 2022 Thing of the Year!

The podcast hosts start by discussing the overall quality of things that were released in 2022. They highlight which stuff stood out as being particularly innovative or effective at creating emotion, and which ones fell flat. They also discuss any notable trends or themes that emerged within the various media in 2022.

The hosts then dive deeper into some of the individual things, providing their own reviews and critiques. They discuss the plot, characters, performances, cinematography, and overall atmosphere of each picture or whatever, as well as any standout moments or parts of the things that stuck with them.

Throughout the episode, the hosts also touch on broader topics related to the films, such as the role of drama in society, the psychology of identity, and the ways in which film has evolved over time.

Ultimately, a "Movie of the Year" podcast episode about 2022's best stuff aims to provide listeners with a comprehensive overview of the year's dramatic offerings and albums and such, as well as thoughtful insights and analysis from knowledgeable and passionate hosts.

THE BANSEES OF INISHERIN - EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE ALL AT ONCE - BETTER CALL SAUL - CHEAT CODES- THE REHERSAL - THE WHITE LOTUS - X* Visit our website * Use our Amazon page! * Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) * Like us! * Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 20222022 Movie of the YearIt's time for the bracket to determine what is the 2022 Movie of the Year!

The podcast hosts start by discussing the overall quality of movies that were released in 2022. They highlight which films stood out as being particularly innovative or effective at creating emotion, and which ones fell flat. They also discuss any notable trends or themes that emerged within the motion pictures in 2022.

The hosts then dive deeper into some of the individual movies, providing their own reviews and critiques. They discuss the plot, characters, performances, cinematography, and overall atmosphere of each picture, as well as any standout moments or scenes that stuck with them.

Throughout the episode, the hosts also touch on broader topics related to the films, such as the role of drama in society, the psychology of identity, and the ways in which film has evolved over time.

Ultimately, a "Movie of the Year" podcast episode about 2022's best movies aims to provide listeners with a comprehensive overview of the year's dramatic offerings, as well as thoughtful insights and analysis from knowledgeable and passionate hosts.

THE BANSEES OF INISHERIN - EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE ALL AT ONCE - THE FABELMANS - NOPE- RRR - TÁR- TOP GUN: MAVERICK - TURNING RED* Visit our website * Use our Amazon page! * Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) * Like us! * Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 20222022 TV Drama of the YearIt's time for the bracket to determine what is the 2022 TV drama of the year!

The podcast hosts start by discussing the overall quality of TV dramas that were released in 2022. They highlight which shows stood out as being particularly innovative or effective at creating emotion, and which ones fell flat. They also discuss any notable trends or themes that emerged within the drama genre in 2022.

The hosts then dive deeper into some of the individual shows, providing their own reviews and critiques. They discuss the plot, characters, performances, cinematography, and overall atmosphere of each program, as well as any standout moments or scenes that stuck with them.

Throughout the episode, the hosts also touch on broader topics related to the drama genre, such as the role of drama in society, the psychology of idenity, and the ways in which dramatic shows have evolved over time.

Ultimately, a "Movie of the Year" podcast episode about 2022 dramas aims to provide listeners with a comprehensive overview of the year's drama offerings, as well as thoughtful insights and analysis from knowledgeable and passionate hosts.

Andor - Heartstopper - Interview with a Vampire - Pachinko - The Sandman - Severance - Under the Banner of Heaven - The White Lotus* Visit our website * Use our Amazon page! * Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) * Like us! * Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 20222022 TV Comedy of the YearIt's time for the bracket to determine what is the 2022 TV comedy of the year!

The podcast hosts start by discussing the overall quality of TV comedies that were released in 2022. They highlight which shows stood out as being particularly innovative or effective at creating laughs, and which ones fell flat. They also discuss any notable trends or themes that emerged within the comedy genre in 2022.

The hosts then dive deeper into some of the individual shows, providing their own reviews and critiques. They discuss the plot, characters, performances, cinematography, and overall atmosphere of each program, as well as any standout moments or scenes that stuck with them.

Throughout the episode, the hosts also touch on broader topics related to the comedy genre, such as the role of comedy in society, the psychology of humor, and the ways in which comedy shows have evolved over time.

Ultimately, a "Movie of the Year" podcast episode about 2022 comedy shows aims to provide listeners with a comprehensive overview of the year's comedy offerings, as well as thoughtful insights and analysis from knowledgeable and passionate hosts.

Atlanta - Bad Sisters - Barry - The Bear - Hacks - The Rehearsal - Reservation Dogs - Southside* Visit our website * Use our Amazon page! * Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) * Like us! * Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 20222022 Horror Movie of the YearIt's time for the 8-movie bracket to determine what is the single greatest horror movie of 2022!

The podcast hosts start by discussing the overall quality of horror movies that were released in 2022. They highlight which films stood out as being particularly innovative or effective at creating scares, and which ones fell flat. They also discuss any notable trends or themes that emerged within the horror genre in 2022.

The hosts then dive deeper into some of the individual films, providing their own reviews and critiques. They discuss the plot, characters, performances, cinematography, and overall atmosphere of each movie, as well as any standout moments or scenes that stuck with them.

Throughout the episode, the hosts also touch on broader topics related to the horror genre, such as the role of horror in society, the psychology of fear, and the ways in which horror movies have evolved over time.

Ultimately, a "Movie of the Year" podcast episode about 2022 horror movies aims to provide listeners with a comprehensive overview of the year's horror offerings, as well as thoughtful insights and analysis from knowledgeable and passionate hosts.

BARBARIAN - BODIES BODIES BODIES - FRESH - MAD GOD- NOPE - PEARL - SMILE - X* Visit our website * Use our Amazon page! * Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) * Like us! * Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 20222022 Album of the YearIt's time to pick the 2022 Album of the Year, and you know we couldn't do it without our friends, The Unnatural 20's!

It's the biggest night in music podcasting! The Best of 2022 season is well underway, and now it is time to pick which album will represent the year. What's the best way to do that? Tell some of the greatest albums of the year that they weren't good enough, and to kick f'in rocks, bro!

Tonight, this bracket will be taken down from a Sweet 16 to an Elite 8, A Final Four, a Championship, and then just one Champion. Our panelists -- which include Mike, Ryan, and Greg from Movie of the Year, Cassie and Katelynn from The Superhero Show Show, Mackenna from Unnatural 20's -- must be quick, they must be unfeeling, and they must be merciless, as albums are eliminated or replaced. There is no longer anytime for emotion, despite everyone showing lots of emotion all of the time.

Join us as all of the Taste Buds imaginable lay out the parts of the season that have already been released, and the brackets that are yet to come. If there was ever time to know that there is no God, it's now, as some of the greatest contemporary pop culture of the last year is flushed down the toilet with nary a thought. Tune in, and be a part of history.

16 WILL ENTER, 15 WILL DIEALVVAYS - ANGEL OLSEN - BAD BUNNY - BEYONCE - BIG THIEF - CARLY RAE JEPSEN - CONWAY THE MACHINE - DANGER MOUSE - ETHEL CAIN - FONTAINES D.C. - JOCKSTRAP - KENDRICK LAMAR - PUP - RINA SAWAYAMA - ROSALIA - THE SMILE - SUDAN ARCHIVES - TAYLOR SWIFT - WET LEG - WEYES BLOOD* Visit our website * Use our Amazon page! * Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) * Like us! * Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 2022The Best of 2022 Preview Show, Pt. 2It's time to complete the 2022 brackets with previews of the Album of the Year, Horror Film of the Year, Comedy TV Show of the Year, Drama TV Show of the Year, and Film of the Year. It's the beginning of the end for 2022!

It's the biggest night in podcasting! The Best of 2022 season is well underway, and now it is time to preview the rest of the season. What's the best way to do that? Tell some of the greatest shows, movies, and albums of the year that they weren't good enough, and to kick f'in rocks, bro! Over the next five weeks, Movie of the Year is going to present five brackets, attempting to figure out what is the greatest of the year in each category.

Tonight, those brackets will be taken down from a Sweet 16 to an Elite 8. Our panelists, which include Mike, Ryan, and Greg from Movie of the Year, Cassie and Katelynn from The Superhero Show Show, Mackenna from Unnatural 20's, plus friends of the show Margot and Taylor, must be quick, they must be unfeeling, and they must be merciless, as albums, shows, and movies, are eliminated or replaced. There is no longer anytime for emotion, despite everyone showing lots of emotion all of the time.

Join us as all of the Taste Buds imaginable lay out the parts of the season that have already been released, and the brackets that are yet to come. If there was ever time to know that there is no God, it's now, as some of the greatest contemporary pop culture of the last year is flushed down the toilet with nary a thought. Tune in, and be a part of history.

80 WILL ENTER, 40 WILL DIEABBOTT ELEMENTARY - AFTERSUN - ALL THE BEAUTY AND THE BLOODSHED - ALVVAYS - ANDOR - ANGEL OLSEN - ATLANTA - BAD BUNNY - BAD SISTERS - THE BANSHEES OF INISHERIN - BARBARIAN - BARRY - THE BATMAN - THE BEAR - BETTER CALL SAUL - BETTER THINGS - BEYONCE - BIG THIEF - THE BLACK PHONE - BODIES BODIES BODIES - BONES AND ALL - CARLY RAE JEPSEN - CONWAY THE MACHINE - CRIMES OF THE FUTURE - DANGER MOUSE - DECISION TO LEAVE - DERRY GIRLS - THE DROPOUT - EO - ETHEL CAIN - EUPHORIA - EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE ALL AT ONCE - THE FABELMANS - FONTAINES D.C. - FRESH - GLASS ONION: A KNIVES OUT MYSTERY - GUILLERMO DEL TORO'S PINOCCHIO - HACKS - HEARTSTOPPER - HOUSE OF THE DRAGON - INDUSTRY - INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE - JOCKSTRAP - KENDRICK LAMAR - THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RINGS OF POWER - MAD GOD - MEN - THE MENU - NOPE - ORPHAN: FIRST KILL - OUR FLAG MEANS DEATH - PACHINKO - PEARL - PUP - THE REHEARSAL - RESERVATION DOGS - RINA SAWAYAMA - ROSALIA - RRR - THE SANDMAN - SCREAM - SEVERANCE - SLOW HORSES - SMILE - THE SMILE - SOMEBODY SOMEWHERE - SOUTH SIDE - STRANGER THINGS - SUDAN ARCHIVES - TAR - TAYLOR SWIFT - THIS IS GOING TO HURT - TOP GUN: MAVERICK - TURNING RED - UNDER THE BANNER OF HEAVEN - WATCHER - WE OWN THIS CITY - WET LEG - WEYES BLOOD - WHAT WE DO IN THE SHADOWS - THE WHITE LOTUS - WOMEN TALKING - XAND MANY, MANY MORE!Make sure to also:* Visit our website * Use our Amazon page! * Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) * Like us! * Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 2022The Best of 2022 Preview ShowIt's time to begin the 2022 brackets with previews of the Album of the Year, Horror Film of the Year, Comedy TV Show of the Year, Drama TV Show of the Year, and Film of the Year. It's the beginning of the end for 2022!

It's the biggest night in podcasting! The Best of 2022 season is well underway, and now it is time to preview the rest of the season. What's the best way to do that? Tell some of the greatest shows, movies, and albums of the year that they weren't good enough, and to kick f'in rocks, bro! Over the next five weeks, Movie of the Year is going to present five brackets, attempting to figure out what is the greatest of the year in each category.

Tonight, those brackets will be taken down from a Sweet 16 to an Elite 8. Our panelists, which include Mike, Ryan, and Greg from Movie of the Year, Cassie and Katelynn from The Superhero Show Show, Mackenna from Unnatural 20's, plus friends of the show Margot and Taylor, must be quick, they must be unfeeling, and they must be merciless, as albums, shows, and movies, are eliminated or replaced. There is no longer anytime for emotional, despite everyone showing lots of emotion all of the time.

Join us as all of the Taste Buds imaginable lay out the parts of the season that have already been released, and the brackets that are yet to come. If there was ever time to know that there is no God, it's now, as some of the greatest contemporary pop culture of the last year is flushed down the toilet with nary a thought. Tune in, and be a part of history.

80 WILL ENTER, 40 WILL DIEABBOTT ELEMENTARY - AFTERSUN - ALL THE BEAUTY AND THE BLOODSHED - ALVVAYS - ANDOR - ANGEL OLSEN - ATLANTA - BAD BUNNY - BAD SISTERS - THE BANSHEES OF INISHERIN - BARBARIAN - BARRY - THE BATMAN - THE BEAR - BETTER CALL SAUL - BETTER THINGS - BEYONCE - BIG THIEF - THE BLACK PHONE - BODIES BODIES BODIES - BONES AND ALL - CARLY RAE JEPSEN - CONWAY THE MACHINE - CRIMES OF THE FUTURE - DANGER MOUSE - DECISION TO LEAVE - DERRY GIRLS - THE DROPOUT - EO - ETHEL CAIN - EUPHORIA - EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE ALL AT ONCE - THE FABELMANS - FONTAINES D.C. - FRESH - GLASS ONION: A KNIVES OUT MYSTERY - GUILLERMO DEL TORO'S PINOCCHIO - HACKS - HEARTSTOPPER - HOUSE OF THE DRAGON - INDUSTRY - INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE - JOCKSTRAP - KENDRICK LAMAR - THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RINGS OF POWER - MAD GOD - MEN - THE MENU - NOPE - ORPHAN: FIRST KILL - OUR FLAG MEANS DEATH - PACHINKO - PEARL - PUP - THE REHEARSAL - RESERVATION DOGS - RINA SAWAYAMA - ROSALIA - RRR - THE SANDMAN - SCREAM - SEVERANCE - SLOW HORSES - SMILE - THE SMILE - SOMEBODY SOMEWHERE - SOUTH SIDE - STRANGER THINGS - SUDAN ARCHIVES - TAR - TAYLOR SWIFT - THIS IS GOING TO HURT - TOP GUN: MAVERICK - TURNING RED - UNDER THE BANNER OF HEAVEN - WATCHER - WE OWN THIS CITY - WET LEG - WEYES BLOOD - WHAT WE DO IN THE SHADOWS - THE WHITE LOTUS - WOMEN TALKING - XAND MANY, MANY MORE!Make sure to also:* Visit our website * Use our Amazon page! * Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) * Like us! * Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 20222022 MixtapeThe Tastebudz have assembled to form the 2022 mixtape!

2022 was a wonderful time in music, there is no disputing this. Artists like The Weeknd and Bad Bunny released album after amazing album to a tune-hungry populous. But as much as we need that non-stop firehose of music blasting into our earballs, we're not always sure we have time to listen to an entire album. Maybe not even an entire song if it's going to be over four minutes. Not when we are making over a thousand hours of new podcast material a day (estimated), bub.

So we have to take all this great music and isolate the pith of its true greatness, recompile it into a new, superior form, and let our listeners benefit from our expansive genius and generosity. We have all the big acts of the day: Doja Cat, Beyonce, Cardi B, our panelist Mike--essentially everyone you'd ever want to hear, in the order you'd want to hear them.

Check out the playlist here

Make sure to also:* Visit our website * Use our Amazon page! * Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) * Like us! * Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at podvoices.help

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 2022Century of the Year 2022The top 100 pop culture moments of 2022 discussed by the world's closest friends: it's Century of the Year 2022!

So much happened in the world of pop culture in 2022. To fully digest and understand everything that went down would require several seasons of several different podcasts, working singly, but for the common goal. And certainly 2022 is worth it, but we just don't have that much time on our hands! That's right, it's time for Century of the Year 2022

No, we should give much more time to each event in 2022, but all we were able to allocate to the phenomenal year was one minute a piece to cover the top 100 topics of 2022!

Will your favorite moment be on our list? That's a good question and it's one that everybody is asking themselves right now. Well, there's only one way to figure it out, and that's to listen to the show right now and to share it with your friends and neighbors, and yes, church.

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 2022Oscar DraftWhich films will get the most 2022 Oscar nominations?

The Oscars. When it comes to little statues handed to movie stars, the absolute top of the table. 2022 had movies galore, and many of them were terrific. But will the academy know which movies to award? Their record on this is spotty at best and disastrous at worst, leading to a feeling that ultimately the Oscars don't even matter anymore. Let us be clear, this is a mostly correct position held by cool people. But if you love pop-culture you still have to talk about the Oscars, even if only to roll your eyes and sigh while pointing out that, yeah, they blew it again.

Remember Crash? Remember Green Book? Gross.

And we are to pop-culture what Britney was 4 U: a slave. So, yeah, we're gonna talk about the Oscars. They're not the Brunos! Encanto is so great, right? Noy 2022, but still a great movie.

However, around here we can't talk about a subject without making it into a weird game that hurts my feelings but I hide the hurt and NEVER let it show because Greg is Mommy's brave boy and if he can't hold in his feelings then the whole world could fall apart. Again, Encanto (2021) is such a great movie, isn't it?

No one has ever beaten Ryan at this game or even gotten a second-place that felt worth a gosh darn, but the panel came prepared this time. We've done the research; we know the angles; and we're ready to take down Ryan, our sensei of cinema. All that and more on this week's episode!

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Gangs of New York (BONUS)The Taste Buds meet at the Five Points to discuss 2002's Gangs of New York and decide whether or not it should have been in contention for Movie of the Year!

Gangs of New York is one of those movies that we all think must be good because we feel like we saw it twenty years ago and maybe liked it. But is it good? It has a very weird tone, a pocket-sized New York, and a desire to rewrite history at every pass. In addition, it contains the top-ten worst Irish accents in movie history, all in one place. So what exactly is this movie so fondly remembered for? Well, it has Daniel Day Lewis doing a performance that is certainly remarkable, but even he feels like he never lives up to the standards of his oeuvre.

Probably, this movie skates by on an extra-large helping of vibes. The costumes are pretty cool, and you'll never go broke on movies about how hard Irish people had it in this country. Also, it read the future of America's political leanings fairly effectively. Most likely because the current political atmosphere on the right is a retrograde harkening back to some arcadian past that only existed in movies this fake.

But this leaves the question--did we like this movie?

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002GenreBlastThe Taste Buds meet to discuss 2002 GenreBlast and argue about which genres were best represented in 2002!

Genres, they make up the bulk at the movies lefty Hollywood pumps out to us year after year, but we here at Pop Filter have no time for anything that is not a serious, pinky-in-the-air drama. However, we know how upsetting it is to simply dispense with action, romance, family, or comedies--just to name a few--and so we've brought this very special show to you to make sure that we are representing 2002 to the best of our abilities? No, it is time to tackle all these bad boys and make sure we are giving them their due.

Every action movie and comedy deserve just as much love as the "important dramas," which is why we have crammed them all into this one short episode as our way of saying, "you are (sort of) valid (in a lesser way)." Each of these movies was the dream of hundreds of people, willed into existence and forever cast onto film for generations of people to watch and remember, the least we could do is rip on them and make a fart noise as we declaim their loss "a total slam dunk."

All that and more on this week's episode of Movie of the Year!

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Lilo & Stitch (Bonus Episode)The Taste Buds learn the meaning of family by watching Lilo & Stitch!

Lilo & Stitch is a beautiful, loving, caring look at what it means to be a family. Not the blood coursing through our veins, but the love that beats within our breast. Plus, it's got one of the all time goofy little guys in the stitular Titch. Excuse me, the titular Stich. That kind of wacky mix up would be right up that adorable alien's odd alley.

The Taste Buds explore the legacy of this film and what makes it stand out from other Disney also-rans. This movie isn't the first one people think of when they bring up Disney, but does that mean it doesn't have its fans? Also, we explore how 2002 the movie was in tone and message. What, if any, signs are there that this movie is coming out right after 9/11? And we ask whether or not this movie deserved to be included in our final 16-movie bracket!

All that and more on this week's episode of Movie of the Year!

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the YearThe Sight and Sound Greatest Films of All TimeThe Taste Buds compare their Movie of the Year to the Sight and Sound Greatest Films of All Time

The Sight & Sound greatest films of all time list is essentially the canon for movies. Many critics and many directors are tasked with once every five years deciding on the 100 best films. Well, they have submitted their lists, and for us this is basically a report card. So how did we do? When judged exclusively on how much fun we had with our friends (each other), we get an A+! But this is the real world of podcasting, where no one cares about that.

In this episode, we go through every season of the show so far and compare the winners from each year with the recently released list.

It will be interesting to see how the biggest films of our show—blockbusters like T2: Judgement Day, Die Hard, and E.T. The Extraterrestrial—stack up to the greatest movies ever made. These films lead the conversation in American pop culture, but this is an international list and is therefore more likely to be full of important movies where nothing happens and everyone is really sad while smoking next to a window.

I bet we do great. Really maybe it is more of a report card for them. How’d they do? Maybe they don’t know movies half as well as they think.

How did the Taste Buds' picks stack up to those of the Sight and Sound Greatest Films of All Time? Did they agree or agree to forever disagree? Tune in to hear!

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Battle RoyaleThe Taste Buds goes to a remote island to kill each other discussing Battle Royale!

Before Squid Game, before Ready or Not, before Avengers Arena, before the Purge series, before the Hunger Games, there was Battle Royale. The final film directed by Kinji Fukasaku, with a screenplay written by his son, Kenta Fukasaku, Battle Royale follows a 9th grade class on a field trip gone awry. In the near future, the Japanese government has passed the "BR" act out of fear of wayward youths. So they regularly send entire classes out to kill each other on a prepared battlefield. We get to know 40 some students, including, Shuya, a boy haunted by his father's suicide; Kuninobu, Shuyo's best friend who maybe stabbed a teacher once and is in love with Noriko, who MIGHT be in love with Shuya--because even though they're fighting for their lives, the kids still got crushes! Some of the kids embrace the game, some kill themselves rather than take out a classmate, some get slowly dragged into the proceedings but they're all at the whims oaf the army and their vengeful former teacher.

The Taste Buds explore the legacy of Battle Royale and what makes it stand out from the imitators, what the film is saying about childhood vs adulthood, and the purpose of the transfer students! Plus the Rushmore of 2002 Fashion, a draft of killer children, and so much more!

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002InsomniaThe Taste Buds stay awake for 7 days straight to bring you the authentic Insomnia experience!

You know how you get a little slow, a little rough around the edges, a little cranky when you're sleepy? Imagine you're working a murder case in Alaska where the sun only shines, IA is breathing down your neck, and you can't get no shut-eye! That's Al Pacino in Insomnia, baby!

The Taste Buds dig into the forgotten-Nolan film, discussing where he was as a director, how the reigned-in performances of Pacino, Williams, and Swank work in the film, and the importance of Alaska! Plus the Rushmore of Serial Killers, a Robin Williams career retrospective, and so much more!

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002State of the FranchiseThe Taste Buds drill into the biggest movie franchises of 2002!

In 2022, everything is a franchise. It's basically mandated, that unless Jordan Peele is directing it, these movies better be part of a longer string of movies--how else will people know they should see it?!

Things were a little different in 2002. Movies were either about to kick off their franchises, or sequels coming out to test the theory that moviegoers wanted more of these behemoth level blockbusters tied into other stories. We were leaving the era were Chris Tucker and Jackie Chan could hold down a franchise through charm and quotable lines alone.

This week on Movie of the Year, Ryan, Greg, and Superhero Show Show co-host Katelynn break down the 2002 state of the franchise! Where they're going, how they're doing in '02, and if anything needs to be fixed!

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002 Bonus ShowComic BooksThe Taste Buds take on one of the most important years in comics: 2002!

1939- the world met Superman and Batman. 1941 - Captain America punched Hitler in the face. 1961 - The First Family of Marvel Comics changed the game. 1986- The Dark Knight Returns and Watchmen brought gritty darkness to the comics world. 2002 - Does it belong on this list?

Ryan and Mike discuss how impactful 2002 was in the world of comics, and why the moves the Big 2 and indies made were so important! Tune in and then let us know what YOU think about the year in comic book history!

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five.

5. Choice.crd.co has a collection of these resources and more.

You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Mix TapeThe Taste Buds create the greatest 2002 mix tape the world has ever known!

Mix tapes give a unique picture of the year, but making them can take a lot of thought and care. We did it despite this fact because we are very brave. But how exactly do you go about it? Some would argue that you simply decide which are the best songs of 2002 and just go with those. But while that might make an incredible play list, would it truly make a good 2002 mix tape? This was a time of very popular, but also pretty cheesy music.

Mix tapes aren't made for deep cuts. To make it on to this playlist your song had to play at least once in a Carl's Jr or Hardies location. If your music did not play over the loudspeaker in a 2002 community college cafeteria, than it has no place here. We will pick the most fitting songs of 2002, and we will make one of the finest play lists ever heard.

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine...

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Spider-ManThe Taste Buds dip into some deep comic lore to talk about little-known 2002 property, Spider-Man!

Put this one in the category of what was 2002 smoking? Some kid gets bitten by a radioactive spider, and we all know what happens next, right? He gets cancer and dies screaming, I can almost hear you shouting at your computer. (I'm in here, but I can't hear over the fan.) You'd think that because that's how it would go down now, but in 2002 we were still thinking good things might come out of terrible tragedies.

Instead, this wacky kid gets all these zany powers is how it actually goes down in the movie. He's an OK kid, but he's a little homophobic. Also, he has some of that incel energy we've gotten better at noticing lately. And by being a jerk he basically puts a gun to his uncle's head and pull the trigger himself, if you think about it.

Make sure to also:

• Check out the 2002 bracket
• Visit our website
• Use our Amazon page!
• Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)
• Like us!
• Follow us!

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S.

The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.

Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions.

Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few.

You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com.

If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:

1. Shout Your Abortion is a campaign to normalize abortion.

2. Don’t Ban Equality is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions.

3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics.

4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And...

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002 Bonus ShowHalloween: Resurrection

The Taste Buds throw us a Halloween Bonus Bone with a show all about 2002's Halloween: Resurrection! The Taste Buds are interrupting their incredibly long 2002 season with a 17th 2002 movie: Halloween: Resurrection. Katelynn from The Superhero Show Show takes over and makes Ryan and Mike sit their asses down and LISTEN - listen to each other discuss what might be the worst movie of 2002! Can they find something about the movie to make it Halloween: Recommendation?  Katelynn walks the boys through the important parts of the movie. Is this the first movie to also feature an internet watch party? Is this the first movie to feature Busta Rhymes bustin ass with jumpkicks? Tune in to find out the answers to these questions, and more! IMPORTANT NOTE: Halloween: Resurrection is not one of the Sweet 16 movies of the 2002 competition, and is not eligible to be named Movie of the Year: 2002. Sorry to all HallowHeads, Resurrect Seans, Shatner Faces, 'Ween Queens, Myers Triers, Carpenturds, and all other Halloween fan groups. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty2002 (Check out the 2002 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002 Bonus ShowHalloween: Resurrection

The Taste Buds throw us a Halloween Bonus Bone with a show all about 2002's Halloween: Resurrection! The Taste Buds are interrupting their incredibly long 2002 season with a 17th 2002 movie: Halloween: Resurrection. Katelynn from The Superhero Show Show takes over and makes Ryan and Mike sit their asses down and LISTEN - listen to each other discuss what might be the worst movie of 2002! Can they find something about the movie to make it Halloween: Recommendation?  Katelynn walks the boys through the important parts of the movie. Is this the first movie to also feature an internet watch party? Is this the first movie to feature Busta Rhymes bustin ass with jumpkicks? Tune in to find out the answers to these questions, and more! IMPORTANT NOTE: Halloween: Resurrection is not one of the Sweet 16 movies of the 2002 competition, and is not eligible to be named Movie of the Year: 2002. Sorry to all HallowHeads, Resurrect Seans, Shatner Faces, 'Ween Queens, Myers Triers, Carpenturds, and all other Halloween fan groups. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty2002 (Check out the 2002 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002 - Talk to Her Does Talk to Her say enough to be 2002's Movie of the Year? 2002 is here, and we are off to the races with Pedro Almodóvar's Talk to Her. This is a movie the defies simple encapsulation, so it will have to suffice for me to say, this thing is kinda messed up. No, that's not good enough. Kinda really messed up, even. Nah, still not there. It is European. OK, there I got it. This movie is European as heck. If you have never seen an Almodóvar movie are you going to be totally lost? Maybe. You'll definitely want to watch more of his movies after this, but ultimately you'll be able to enjoy Talk to Her even if you've never bellied up to the Almodó Bar. The movie has undergone a bit of a rating recalibrations lately, and we discuss whether or not we think that's fair, probably sounding as disconnected and grumpy as ever! Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty2002 (Check out the 2002 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Introduction, Part 2 The 2002 Movie of the Year Introduction Part 2 is here; what eight movies will make up this season? 2002! Oh, how I wish that were the number of movies we got to watch and not just year that will make up this season. But that wouldn't be fair. Not to us. Not to you. And not to the most important part of the entire podcast: the movies. We swore a sacred oath to only have eight movies in a season. Hard decisions make this show what it is: a source of comfort to the entire nation. If we were going to expand the bracket, even a little, we would completely change everything about the show. So I guess we won't be doing that. However, you can see why we would be tempted. Talk to Her, a Spanish-language film, came out this year and it is maybe the best movie most Americans have never heard of. You got Russian Ark, another foreign film that is high-concept and exciting--movies like this are the reason we love doing the show. And that's not even mentioning the movies that are so big that we could never overlook them: Spider-Man, Minority Report, and Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. What's a show to do? Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty2002 (Check out the 2002 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Introduction The 2002 Movie of the Year Introduction is here; which of these amazing films will take home the most coveted prize in Hollywood? The 2002 season is here, and though we are sad to see the 1982 season end, we have never been more "jazzed" to tackle a year. We got a Spider-Man in this year, a Blade sequel, and a Steven Spielberg adaptation of a Philip K. Dick short story with Minority Report. I know what you're thinking: wow, with all these great motion pictures (in addition to your own personal strengths) you must be in movie heaven. Maybe this is heaven for you, the intelligent and tasteful listener, but this is actually a hellish experience for us. But how could this be? See, we love the movies of 2002 because they came at a very important time in our lives: earlier. Oh, earlier, we never appreciated you before, but now you're all we want. These were the movies we reshelved at Blockbuster Video. These were the movies we hopped from theater to theater to see after buying one matinee ticket at 10:30AM. And with 32 important movies and only 8 final slots in out 2002 bracket, we know we are going to break a few hearts--our own! Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty2002 (Check out the 2002 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2002Introduction The 2002 Movie of the Year Introduction is here; which of these amazing films will take home the most coveted prize in Hollywood? The 2002 season is here, and though we are sad to see the 1982 season end, we have never been more "jazzed" to tackle a year. We got a Spider-Man in this year, a Blade sequel, and a Steven Spielberg adaptation of a Philip K. Dick short story with Minority Report. I know what you're thinking: wow, with all these great motion pictures (in addition to your own personal strengths) you must be in movie heaven. Maybe this is heaven for you, the intelligent and tasteful listener, but this is actually a hellish experience for us. But how could this be? See, we love the movies of 2002 because they came at a very important time in our lives: earlier. Oh, earlier, we never appreciated you before, but now you're all we want. These were the movies we reshelved at Blockbuster Video. These were the movies we hopped from theater to theater to see after buying one matinee ticket at 10:30AM. And with 32 important movies and only 8 final slots in out 2002 bracket, we know we are going to break a few hearts--our own! Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty2002 (Check out the 2002 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Finale Part Two 1982's Movie of the Year Finale Part Two is here; which of these amazing films will take home the most coveted prize in Hollywood? Well, here we are at the end of another amazing season. And not just of our show--these movies were pretty good too. Dang, how can we chose just one of these to be 1982's Movie of the Year? Can't we just say they all win and then apologize for being huge cowards? Well, I asked Mike and he said "no," and reminded me I promised not to call him when I know he's at work. But that begs the question: Is Mike still at work? I'll just give him a ringsy to see. He is. Is E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial too obvious to win it all? Maybe we'll want to get cute and choose 1982's other alien visitor from another land: the thing, star of The Thing. If we wanted to be really "cool" or "hip" we could pick the obscure-but-transcendent Fitzcarraldo. Poltergeist is the fourth-ranked movie in the bracket, but it is hard to see any world where it has a chance to win it all. I doubt it will even take home any Mooties. But Mooties will be going out to several lucky performers. These awards allow us to indicate who did bad, who did good, and who did bad good. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Finale Part One 1982's Movie of the Year Finale is here; which of these amazing films will take home the most coveted prize in Hollywood? The good news is that we are drawing to the exciting conclusion of another fantastic season of movie watching. The bad news is the 1982 season is almost over and we will probably never talk about it or think about it again. The blockbusters were never bigger than in 1982, but they had a lot to say as well, a surprising amount of it about the 1980's -- even though the decade had hardly started. Is E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial too obvious to win it all? Maybe we'll want to get cute and choose 1982's other alien visitor from another land: the thing, star of The Thing. If we wanted to be really "cool" or "hip" we could pick the obscure-but-transcendent Fitzcarraldo. Poltergeist is the fourth-ranked movie in the bracket, but it is hard to see any world where it has a chance to win it all. I doubt it will even take home any Mooties. But Mooties will be going out to several lucky performers. These awards allow us to indicate who did bad, who did good, and who did bad good. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Finale Part One 1982's Movie of the Year Finale is here; which of these amazing films will take home the most coveted prize in Hollywood? The good news is that we are drawing to the exciting conclusion of another fantastic season of movie watching. The bad news is the 1982 season is almost over and we will probably never talk about it or think about it again. The blockbusters were never bigger than in 1982, but they had a lot to say as well, a surprising amount of it about the 1980's -- even though the decade had hardly started. Is E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial too obvious to win it all? Maybe we'll want to get cute and choose 1982's other alien visitor from another land: the thing, star of The Thing. If we wanted to be really "cool" or "hip" we could pick the obscure-but-transcendent Fitzcarraldo. Poltergeist is the fourth-ranked movie in the bracket, but it is hard to see any world where it has a chance to win it all. I doubt it will even take home any Mooties. But Mooties will be going out to several lucky performers. These awards allow us to indicate who did bad, who did good, and who did bad good. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Gandhi Was Gandhi somehow too successful to make it into the bracket for 1982's Movie of the Year? Gandhi was a great man, but we weren't really interested in this movie because it won so many Oscars. That makes sense, I promise. We almost got to the end of the year before we even considered the movie because we feared it would fall into the category of Green Books and Crashes, which are cynical grabs for award wins, while being essentially inoffensive nothings. Small little nods of movies. "Oh, I get it being bad is bad."  But is that doing this movie a disservice? Gandhi's one of the biggest movies of all time, and Ben Kingsley performance is rightly considered among the best in the history of Cinema. The good news is there are a lot of ways to feel about this movie and each of our panelists feels a slightly different way. The bad news is the 1982 season is almost over. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Victor/Victoria Is Victor/Victoria dragging us for it leaving off of the bracket for 1982's Movie of the Year? Starring Julie Andrews playing a woman pretending to be a man who is performing as a woman, and made in the early 1980's, you might think Victor/Victoria runs the risk of being a little old-fashioned. And you'd be right! But in all the best ways. It is non-stop entertainment, doesn't feel self-important, and celebrates the real heroes: the entertainers themselves. It's about living out loud and being proud of who you are, especially if who you are is the kind of person who plants a bug in their food to get out of paying for it. And why not? Julie Andrew shouldn't ever have to pay for food and neither should any of her characters. She is a treasure, no matter what Ryan and Mike say. In many ways, Julie Andrews is the Greg of musical performers, the Greg of Hollywood, and even the Greg of our hearts (beside Greg). Wherever mean Ryans and Mikes are, there too will be the noble Greg, correcting and amending. It's good to know the Gregs are out there, making the world a better place. This post written by Greg. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982The Verdict Is The Verdict judging us for leaving off of the bracket for 1982's Movie of the Year? The Verdict is like the New Yorker of movies. It is made for adults, by adults. And it doesn't try to be everything to everyone by bringing in broad humor or action bombast. This movie is for putting on your smoking jacket, grabbing that smoking pipe, and puffing on that smoking tobacco like an adult. Heck, there aren't even kids in this movie. But it is also about the nitty gritty of how the legal sausage gets made. So in that way it might be a little hard to watch. However, we would watch Paul Newman make literal sausage, arms deep in the meat paste, sausage casing clinging to his big hands, kneading, always kneading. We also weigh in on Boston with the respect that one of America's most historical cities truly deserves. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Tootsie Is Tootsie too cringey to be 1982's Movie of the Year? Tootsie has every reason to be one of the most uncomfortable movies we have covered. It's about crossdressing and gender and it is forty years old. However, the movie manages to handle sensitive subject matter with a lot of grace considering it is the same age most people are when they decide, "I'm going to give hate a try." Is it perfect in its depiction of gender? No, but we've all seen movies which came out recently that do a worse job. Remember Showgirls? That has nothing to do with anything I have been talking about, I was just thinking: "Man, remember Showgirls?" Plus, Tootsie has incredible performances. At the core of the film is a very talented cast who are clearly getting the most out of each other. Sounds like a certain podcast we all listen to...that's right, Joe Rogan. Of course I am kidding -- we would never listen to podcasts. Now, please listen to this podcast! Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982The Thing Will The Thing prove itself evolved enough to be 1982's Movie of the Year? The Thing makes us confront the fact that if we had the ability to look like, or be like, anybody it would only be a matter of time before we would choose to become Wilford Brimley. No way the universe's most evolved lifeform would pass him by. And what is up with the titular Thing? Abandoned (?), sentenced (?), marooned (?)  on Earth, this horrible alien life form takes over anything and everything that crosses its path, perhaps even a never-fetcher Kurt Russell and/or the incomparable Keith David.  Weird alien lifeform trying to blend in with the humans? What is this thing Jared Kushner? Yeah, we do politics now. Are the special effects special enough? Is the gore too gory? Is it weird that this movie was made by cast and crew that was exclusively male? I cannot answer these questions in the write-up of the podcast. No, one must look to the podcast itself to answer questions such as these. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Mixtape

Listen to us construct the definitive 1982 mixtape! Some years we do this mixtape and it's really more accurately a playlist, or in its own time it would have been burned on to a CD. But not in 1982. In 1982 you would be setting those songs down on some magnetic tape to give your girlfriend or boyfriend or whoever. What we make on this episode is a mixtape from the time of mixtapes, from perhaps their origin itself. We're talking Kim Wilde, Dexy's Midnight Runners, and Flock of Seagulls, all the acts that made 1982 what it was: the only time those names would be relevant. Are we going to call 867-5309? And will we do it from behind the wheel of our little red corvette? You're hungry like a wolf to know and have the eye of the tiger for details, but come on Eileen, I ran out of clues to give. Hurts so good. After the episode, https://open.spotify.com/playlist/1JY6UVAxBZZamCpjseAxdR?si=17fe989d307e4150 (check out the playlist here)! Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th.Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan

Who will win the ultimate battle between Kirk, Khan, and the Taste Buds, on an all-new Movie of the Year! On the first episode of Movie of the Year to focus on a Star Trek property (and let's be honest...most likely the last), the Taste Buds are tackling 1982's Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan! Long thought to be the best Star Trek movie of all time, Khan has been brought up all season long, so Ryan, Mike, and Greg had no choice but to discuss it! Because Ryan doesn't know much about the franchise, they're enlisting friend-of-the-show Teri to join the crew! Together, the foursome begin the conversation in the manner conversations of these sorts must begin: by comparing how big their Star Trek wieners are!  From there, however, they dive into the movie. How well does Khan represent Star Trek as a whole? If you love Khan, where do you go from here? Is it straight back to the original series, or do you just move on to The Next Generation? They'll also breakdown the Kirk/Khan dynamic, one of the most glorious relationship/rivalries in all of sci-fi filmdom. Who is the better character, and who gives the better performance? Plus, they'll dive into what the movie has to say about age, death, and the passing of the torch. All of that, and so much more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982State of the Franchise Let's check in on the state of the franchise in 1982! Film franchises weren't as big in 1982 as they are now, but they did exist. By 1982 we were already pretty deep into Friday the 13th, Halloween, and the Rocky franchises. Heck, the Greaseaverse was nearly launched in 1982, only slowed by a universal lack of interest. But the question remains, were these franchise entries any good? Well, good news because we are on the case to find out. Or to at least talk about it. I don't know if you can call three dudes opining about something for thirty minutes "finding out." Join us, please, as we explore what movies continued or started their proud legacies in 1982. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Poltergeist Can Poltergeist scare its way into being 1982's Movie of the Year? Nothing encapsulates the 1980s mindset quite like the horror of buying a huge house only to have it turn out that there is something completely wrong with it. Or maybe it’s about the fundamental horror of realizing that every acre of land in this entire land must be haunted many times over, what with the manifold sins of this country.  But also it's a rip-roaring good time and a special effects smorgasbord! Will this duality help make it Movie of the Year? Probably not with Greg around, but let's do this thing. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources:1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Night Shift Should Night Shift have been included in our 1982 bracket? Night Shift imagines a New York where morgues are always empty, and thus their employees are free to run other "small businesses" out of them. We've got Henry Winkler; we've got Shelley Long; we've got Michael Keaton, and we've got them in various combinations across various scenes. The boys couldn't quite come to an agreement on this movie as a whole, but one thing we were absolutely sure of is that the 3 leads in this movie do a great job of bringing humor, maybe even unexpected humor, to the 1982 season.  But will it be Movie of the Year? No, it obviously won't be movie of the year because it didn't make the bracket, and even if it had made the bracket, we're not totally sure it would have advanced. However, we're better for having seen it, and the season's better for our having discussed it. For instance, we now know the New York morgues are a pretty dead place to be. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Fitzcarraldo Does Fitzcarraldo have what it takes to get over the hump and into the heights of 1982's Movie of the Year? With apologies to Kate Bush, running up that hill is nothing compared to what this movie brings to audiences. Running up a hill? Sure, that sounds very tiring and like a total waste of time, but dragging a big-h boat up a hill? That's even more tiring, and it is many times more a waste of time; however, it is also very dangerous. But on top of that, it is also a tremendously bad idea. Boats on the mountains? What do you mean that doesn't work out fine? Well, dear reader, it looks like you're just going to have to tune in and find out! Fitzcarraldo, why don't you come to your senses? You better let somebody love you. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at https://www.podvoices.help/ (podvoices.help)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Fast Times at Ridgemont High Can Fast Times at Ridgemont High show us it has enough to be 1982's Movie of the Year? Fast Times at Ridgemont High is a movie about the most important thing: scoring. There is simply nothing more important than hooking up with the hot person of your choosing and celebrating the joy and love of your bodies together, especially when you are an appropriate age. That brings me to my next two points: 1.) here's a big hot cup of coffee that I will now take a large sip of; and 2.) I've been assuming everyone in this movie is an appropriate age to be engaging in this sort of sexual activity, so now I will just check while the coffee is still in my mouth, but before I have swallowed the coffee. Readers, I have wiped down my computer and poured myself yet another LARGE cup of very hot coffee. Unfortunately, though, everyone in this movie is far too young to be having sex. I don't want to sound like an old fuddy-duddy. Fuddy? Maybe. Duddy? Possibly. certainly. Bold? Older than the hills, dingleberry. But it seems to me, and I'm quoting High Fidelity here: have sex in college. Perfect time to do it. But in High School? Yuck. Gross. Barf. Focus on learning. Focus on what your teacher probably spent a lot of time and effort to put together for you so you could just go get on your freaking little phone the whole time they're trying to talk and why do horses wear horse shoes? Do they wear horse socks? Is anybody listening to me? Nobody's listening! Is this thing even on? Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe versus Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn’t be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit http://www1.donation4abortion.com/?tm=1&subid4=1657135324.0254620000&kw=Donate+To+Support+Abortion+Access&KW1=Donate%20To%20Support%20Abortion%20Access&KW2=Emergency%20Medical%20Funding&KW3=Find%20A%20Womens%20Health%20Clinic&searchbox=0&domainname=0&backfill=0 (donations4abortion.com). If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1.  https://shoutyourabortion.com/ (Shout Your Abortion) is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. https://dontbanequality.com/ (Don’t Ban Equality) is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. https://abortion.cafe/ (Abortion.cafe) has information about where to find clinics. 4. https://www.plancpills.org/ (PlanCPills.org) provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. And five. 5. https://choice.crd.co/ (Choice.crd.co) has a collection of these resources and more. You can also find links to all of these resources and more info at...

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982GenreBlast What 1982 genre films almost had enough to be considered for Movie of the Year? Genres, they make up the bulk at the movies lefty Hollywood pumps out to us year after year, but we here at Pop Filter have no time for anything that is not a serious, pinky-in-the-air drama. However, we know how upsetting it is to simply dispense with action, romance, family, or comedies, just to name a few, and so we've brought this very special show to you to make sure that we are representing 1982 to the best of our abilities Now, we have covered horror already, so we will focus primarily on the non-horror genre films of 1982. You want action? We got action! We got everything from Sylvester Saloon to Arnold Schwarzenegger. These big beef boys brought the big-beef action, but more importantly? They brought the big beef. Also, they weren't afraid to make us think, especially about that big-boy beef. Romance? Yeah, you're smooching with the best now, son, cuz there's going to be a little bit of romance along the way. (Greg/Mike shippers are gonna make sure they listen to this one!) Comedy? Don't make us laugh! No, wait, do make us laugh! Horror? Make us laugh, or you will die. We cover all this and so much more that, frankly, it's not even possible for me to remember it. We cover genres never invented. Genres long forgotten. We reach across the Multiverse and pluck genres from universes so unlike ours as to make them wholly alien to even the most basic understanding. And we put those genres in a bracket and have them square off against each other one-b'-one because that's the only way to truly understand this place. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial Can E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial "phone home" enough to be 1982's Movie of the Year? Since this movie first came out, people have wondered what E.T. is short for? It may be a little "inside baseball," but E.T. is short because of his stubby little legs. Were they longer, then so too would E.T. be longer. True, his neck does get pretty long. I'm not totally sure what the deal with that is. But dude's legs are so short that he can hardly move, which brings me to my next point. Who cares about that? E.T. is not a movie about moving; it is a movie about feeling. True, one of the most iconic moments in movie history involves bikes doing quite a bit of movement in this, but that's not my point. One guy on twitter I follow says that if he and his friends had found E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, they would have killed him with hammers, which, excessive movement aside, would have made for a vastly different cinematic experience. In this one we talk about the Spielberg of it all, and, really, hasn't he given us so much more than we deserve? We also cover the triumph of practical effects this movie represents. Would we ever have cared this much about a weird, smeared-looking, oddly-hazy CGI monstrosity? Maybe you would have, but not us. We want to become emotionally attached to the puppets, gosh darnt it. Finally, we talk about the way that Spielberg gets "child" people. He must have one day been a kid or something because he really seems to get this kid stuff, and as a result, get some amazing performances out of his child actors. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Das Boot Das Das Boot have what it takes to be 1982's Movie of the Year? This Week's movie, Das Boot, is the kinda movie you may Nazi coming. A lot is going on beneath the surface in this one, but you can't escape the fact that everyone in this movie is a Nazi. But if you prick a Nazi, will they not bleed? Yes, they will. Interesting. If you punch them, will they not bleed? Hmmmm. What if you kick them in the face? I mean, they'd for sure bleed, right? OK, what if you shoved them down some stairs, and their heads hit every step on the way down? They'd bleed just like anyone, else. Makes you think. Really makes you think. If you sliced them, wouldn't they bleed? With a knife or a sword? This is America, so I have to ask this: granted that these men are all Nazis, if you shot them, they bleed, correct? Yeah, they'd bleed. They're only human, and all humans bleed. That's something you can't lose sight of in all this -- they bleed, and anything that bleeds can die. Nazis can die. Every single one of them. So, yeah, we get into the Nazi thing. Quick aside: if you saw a Nazi on the street, and you picked the perfect opportunity to stick your foot out just as they -- probably he, let's face it -- passed by, tripping them and causing them to fall face-forward into the street, when they fell into the street and their face crashed into the ground, they'd bleed, right? These guys are Nazis. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Blade Runner Does Blade Runner have what it takes to be 1982's Movie of the Year? Is Blade Runner the best movie ever made? Perhaps. It is certainly one that we are very excited to talk about. Is it the most important movie ever made? Again, maybe. These are really the kinds of questions we address in the show itself, so if you are asking them, you should just be listening. But maybe it's still downloading and you need something to read, so here goes. Yes, we will get into who is--and who is not--a replicant. We have figured it out and we will pass on the information to you, complete with a visual clue to look for. Ridley Scott is the director of this one, and he is royalty around the Pop Filter studios. He is apparently not in the Pop Filter Hall of Fame, which is hard to believe because his movies come up just about every season. But what is he the master of? What are his major strengths? We get in there and talk it out. Also, we talk about the world building that went into Blade Runner and the absolute crime of the theatrical release's Harrison Ford voice over. Unfortunately, we also have to talk about one of the weirder sex scenes in movie history. What does this scene mean? What's going on here? Maybe 1982 is just a very weird time, much like every other time to so far show up on the timeline. All that and we talk about the music of 1982, which was also kind of weird! Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 198248Hrs. Does 48Hrs. have what it takes to be 1982's Movie of the Year? The first film we talk about in the 1982 season is 48Hrs, and in many ways it is the perfect movie to get us going on the new season. In the late 70's, a couple of dudes had a dream: what if a white dude and a Black dude teamed up together to solve a crime. The plan was set, and Clint Eastwood and Richard Pryor were approached to star. Eventually Eastwood bowed out and Pryor became too big of a star, so the people around Paramount had an idea: use the reworked script as a star vehicle for Nick Nolte and cast that new twenty year old kid from Saturday Night Live. That's right, Eddie Murphy was 20 years old when he stared in this movie. The script went through a couple of re-writes, with dialogue changes happening throughout filming. The writers argued, the execs hated Eddie's performance, and the movie opened in third place. It went on to be the seventh highest grossing movie of the year, and created a star. The story revolves around a cop "borrowing" a prisoner for 48 hours--titular!--in order to find a villain, played by James Remar. It's got an Eddie Murphy who was just about to explode into superstardom that wouldn't end until that Norbit movie put the last big clump of dirt on his career. It's got a Nick Nolte who was already well on his way to becoming Hollywood's crustiest actor. And it's about race, racism, the prison industrial complex, and policing--all topics we get to see share screen time with cool shootouts and some truly great shots of early eighties San Fran (I call it that because I'm basically a local). Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982The Elite Eight Are Chosen It's the second part of the intro to 1982 season of Movie of the Year! It's second part of the intro to 1982 season, and by the time this episode is done filling your ears, you'll know the eight movies that will make up our 1982 season! Who will make it to the Elite Eight? Does E.T. have a chance, or should he phone home to get picked up? Maybe Poltergeist will haunt our Elite Eight. Perhaps we'll put Tron in the final eight, but I bet not because it is very boring. Also, we'll select some of the losers to be the potential subjects of our fan-favorite Bonus Episodes, which help us define what the year really means. Without the Bonus Episodes we'd be missing the important context that helps us crown the eventual champion, as well as all the oddest movies of the year. But the Bonus Episodes are the side dish; for dinner, we are having the Elite Eight. These are the movies that made the year what it was. I was a baby, so I don't totally know what it was like back then, but I'm thinking big shoulders, big hair, and big lines of whatever that is they were always a snortin' and a gummin'. What's fun is you could look at the eight movies we have left and say to yourself, "among these movies is 1982's Movie of the Year, show yourself." If that works, let us know because it could save us a lot of time. However, that probably isn't going to work, so it looks like we're going to have to watch all these movies and yell about them until we have achieved groupthink. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Let's Get This Party Started It's the intro to 1982 season of Movie of the Year! It's time to start a new season of Movie of the Year, and what better year to turn our attention to than 1982? According to my calendar, that was 40 years ago, but -- hang on -- if that's true then that would mean I'm...uh-oh....My god: I've become this super-old guy with a sour disposition and a sore knee. But it could be argued that more than just the health of my joints has deteriorated since 1982. Yes, the quality of the movies themselves has fallen apart worse than my lower back or bathroom area. After all, we'll never see another summer like the Summer of '82. Blade Runner, we're not getting another movie like that, Jack. Not in 2022 anyway. ET? He ain't coming back. And not just because his people live famously short lives due to their drinking. This country doesn't have another ET in it, and the only thing we'll have that's like Blade Runner again is our air quality and total lack of empathy. But that's the grim reality, isn't it? Our present is the awful future these movies looked toward with trepidation. Yeah, well at least we didn't vote for Regan and mess up the whole dang country, you dang dumb preppies. Also, I have a feeling some of these movies are going to be problematic. 48hrs. I dunno, I have a feeling that is gonna be pretty racist, very sexist, and I wanna say potentially homophobic? Conan the Barbarian? In this economy? Plus, I'm getting Northman vibes off that, and I abhor copycats. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://popfilter.co/ (Visit our website) https://popfilter.co/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1982Horror Sneak Preview

Before the 1982 season kicks off, the Taste Buds sit down and discuss all of the horror movies that came out that year! It can be difficult for horror movies to make the Elite 8 in each season of Movie of the Year, and get their own episode that focuses on them. So, for the first time ever, Mike and Ryan are doing a preview show to discuss all of 1982's horror movies before they dive into the bracket. But because they are clearly unqualified to do this, they're going to invite some friends on, including friend-of-the-show Taylor, and Jordan Crucchiola, host of the Whole Movie Pod and Aughtsterion podcasts! Together, the fearsome foursome breaks down all 16 of the horror movies in the 64-film bracket, and which movies Taylor and Jordan should move on, and which ones should get kicked out! Check out this episode, and see which movies get the thumbs up, and which ones get their thumbs ripped off in like a gory way! THE HORROR FILMS OF 1982, including:ALONE IN THE DARK - AMITYVILLE II: THE POSSESSION - BASKET CASE - BUTCHER BAKER NIGHTMARE MAKER - CAT PEOPLE - CREEPSHOW - FRIDAY THE 13TH PART III - HALLOWEEN III: SEASON OF THE WITCH - NEXT OF KIN - PIRANHA II: THE SPAWNING - POLTERGEIST - Q: THE WINGED SERPENT - THE SLUMBER PARTY MASSACRE - SWAMP THING - THE THING - WHITE DOG - AND MORE!  Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1982 (Check out the 1982 bracket) https://yourpopfilter.com/ (Visit our website) https://yourpopfilter.com/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991We Have a Winner By the end of this episode we will all know the 1991 Movie of the Year! Our 1991 season is finally coming to an end. We have watched all the movies, casted all the pods, tallied all the votes -- now it is time to let the people know the results. The world will never be the same after this announcement. We know that better than anyone, but we have to end this season of the podcast. Just because it is called Movie of the Year, doesn't mean that the seasons have to be a dang year long themselves, shoot! So here we are at the end of the longest season of them all, and yet it is still hard to say goodbye to our friends: the movies. Without them, these would all just be years, largely indistinguishable from each other as all of history slides into the grey smudge of our memories. But when you think of Barton Fink, you think of 1991, and just like that the year is alive again. You and your friends, piled in the back of a truck, going to see a rated-R movie. A dream within a dream, my friends. And even if these flicks don't take home the big prize, they can still get in on some of the most prestigious awards Hollywood has to offer -- the Mooties. We award the actors, of course, long may they live, but we also award the best duos and the baddest behavior. Winners are invited to our palatial downtown Burbank studios to pick the awards up in person, and folks better start coming soon because we made them TOO BIG and we have WAY too many. And sometimes they heat up and vibrate, FAST. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1991 (Check out the 1991 bracket) https://yourpopfilter.com/ (Visit our website) https://yourpopfilter.com/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991The Beginning of the End It's the beginning of the End for the 1991 season! Ah, the end of things--it's always a little melancholy. But really this is just the beginning of the end of our 1991 season. Luckily, we still have the whole end in front of us. Sure, we used up all the middle, and the beginning is a distant, hazy memory. Yes, the whole end to go. By the end of this beginning, we'll have gone from our top eight movies to a final four of phenomenal films. Will it be Silence of the Lambs, a film about serial killers living for today? Perhaps it will be the movie that birthed a million baby goths, The Addams Family. I have my money on Barton Fink, gentle reader, because it's just a little too weird. See, you could argue that Barton Fink needs to be a little more normal, which it totally does. It's just that would make it a worse picture. So you can see why that would intrigue and beguile us. Maybe the winner will be Boy n the Hood with its stark portrayal of Nineties fashion, or Beauty n the Beast with its intriguing portrayal of Gaston's hairy chest. And even if these flicks don't take home the big prize, they can still get in on some of the most prestigious awards Hollywood has to offer -- the Mooties. We award the actors, of course, long may they live, but we also award the best sex, violence, and bad behavior. Winners are invited to our palatial downtown Burbank studios to pick the awards up in person, and folks better start coming soon because we made them TOO BIG and we have WAY too many. And sometimes they heat up and vibrate, FAST. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1991 (Check out the 1991 bracket) https://yourpopfilter.com/ (Visit our website) https://yourpopfilter.com/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Bonus Episode - Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2: The Secret of the Ooze Just because Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2: The Secret of the Ooze can't win Movie of the Year doesn't mean it can't win your love Ooze. The 1990s were full of it, and no year more chocker-block than 1991. You'd open your locker: ooze. You'd check what mom packed for lunch: ooze. You'd do a flawless dance for your peers: ooze and ahhs. But everyone had the same question when it came to ooze — what’s its secret?  Was its secret that ooze was everywhere? Seems like an odd secret, and also, no. However, it really was everywhere. All toys were covered in, or created, some sort of goop or ooze or slime. Not gak. Gak didn’t come out until 1992 and I wish you could hear how pig-ignorant you sound right now. Geez.  This ubiquitous toy gunk was likely big business training us to get used to all the toxic waste they were creating and hiding in forests and beneath oceans and such. Maybe that is the secret? That it’s baby’s first toxic waste? That's probably a secret of some ooze, but I doubt it is the secret of this particular ooze. These questions cried out for answers in cinema form, and luckily for us the Ninja Turtles and their good friend, Vanilla Ice, are here to give us an answer, provided there is enough time. Actually, there apparently isn’t enough time to get to the secret of the ooze in the movie The Secret of the Ooze, but Ryan says it’s that the ooze is from space, which OK. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1991 (Check out the 1991 bracket) https://yourpopfilter.com/ (Visit our website) https://yourpopfilter.com/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Bonus Episode - My Girl Just because My Girl can't win Movie of the Year doesn't mean it can't change your life We tackle yet another of 1991's iconic movies and we do it with a little help from our friends Emily, from I Drink Your Podcast, and Nate, from A Vague Idea (and also Delaware). They both watched the movie and they both filled out the requisite paperwork, so now they're on the show. It could be you, but will it be? Howard Zieff’s My Girl is the story of Vada Sultenfuss (her for-real name), a young girl learning about life while living in the shadow of death. That makes her life sound really tragic, but actually she just lives in a funeral home. But her mom is dead. And that is kinda tragic. Oh, and she sorta thinks it’s her own fault — also pretty tragic. And her — spoiler alert — best friend — spoiler alert — is spoiled by a bunch of overly alert bees. Which you better bet was pretty tragic to me when I saw it as the 10-year-old softboy I was when I watched this movie for the first time and remain all these years later. The movie is funny, warm, compassionate, and beautiful, but it is also an untidy mess that may bite off a bit more than it was ever prepared to chew. Also, it features two kids — Anna Clumsky and Kieran Culkin’s younger brother— and we know that can always turn out rough for a movie. Also, this movie may or may not feature Slimer from the hit movie Ghostbusters II: The Secret of the Ooze. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1991 (Check out the 1991 bracket) https://yourpopfilter.com/ (Visit our website) https://yourpopfilter.com/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Bonus Episode - Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves Just because Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves can't win Movie of the Year doesn't mean it can't change your life Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves is about stealing. At its heart, it explores the deep impulses inside each of us to throw off the trappings of the civilized world and give in to the desire to take what isn't ours, but that which should also not belong to the elites who don't need it, can't find any use for it, but know they will die if they lose even an iota of it. Also Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves explores our deep ambivalence to location and period appropriate accents, which, sure, seem nice, but can be a real drag to commit to for an entire movie. Especially when actors can give the occasional wisp of an accent to remind us that this all takes place in merry old England, back before we knew it was wrong to launch holy wars against far flung neighbors whose only crime was worshipping a different-yet-still-pretty-goofy god to ours. Now we know we shouldn't do that, and so we make sure we have cooked up some really flimsy reasoning for why we have to go and plunder the homes of poors from around the global bend. It's the decent thing to do and the west is committed to the appearance of such things. The real problem starts when your king is off having the absolute time of his life and some local-slash-loco sheriff starts getting up in people's biz. That's when it becomes a big yikes for all involved. And that's where we start our tale... Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1991 (Check out the 1991 bracket) https://yourpopfilter.com/ (Visit our website) https://yourpopfilter.com/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Bonus Episode - The Last Boy Scout Just because The Last Boy Scout can't win Movie of the Year doesn't mean it can't change you life? In 1991 this country still knew how to make movies. What does every movie need? That's right: Bruce Willis. We got B-Willz in this one, so that's a check. Also, the perfect movie is gonna need a guy falling through the spinning blades of a helicopter. Skadoosh, that's a check. Spoiler alert on that last point, obviously, but it is still an offish check. Last, the movie absolutely must have a boy scout. Ladies and gentlemen, can you please call my good friend Taylor because I'm gonna need a...CHECK PLEASE! Hold for applause. Let the audience thank you for how you've changed their lives. Are there applause breaks in articles though? But I digregs, The Last Boy Scout may not have changed the world of blockbuster movies, but it certainly changed the lives of Greg and Ryan, both of whom would grow up to work at the same Blockbuster Video. (Greg isn't in this one so I thought I would mention him here because he gets so sad, you guys.) Is The Last Boy Scout a really good time, or a super gross movie? Both and neither, but definitely both. Is it too sexist for its own good, or does it manage to comment on the sexism of other action movies? And does this movie just absolutely hate action movies in general? The guys get into it on this one in what must be the most in depth conversation about this movie of all time. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1991 (Check out the 1991 bracket) https://yourpopfilter.com/ (Visit our website) https://yourpopfilter.com/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!) Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Thelma and Louise Will Thelma and Louise shoot and drive its way to our 1991 Movie of the Year? Ridley Scott’s Thelma and Louise has a tough act to follow in last week’s A Brighter Summer Day. And, stylistically, the two movies couldn’t be more different, but in many ways Thelma and Louise tackles much of the same subject matter: male dominance of women, male violence against women, and an air of systemic disinterest—if not out right antagonism—to the plight of women in general. All while wrapping up in just over 2 hours, but I digregs. In this film we see the title characters set out on a road trip that immediately turns into a nightmare, thanks to—you guessed it—dudes. Dudes, bros, jerks, derps, scrubs, and f-boys fly at these two women like bugs through the night air. But, unlike those bugs which harmlessly splatter uponst their windshield, these dudes ruin everything and then come back to make sure they finished ruining everything and THEN force our main characters—played perfectly by Susan Sarandon and Geena Davis—off a literal freaking cliff. Go to heck, dudes, go straight to heck! Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. However, we cannot. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1991 (Check out the 1991 bracket) https://yourpopfilter.com/ (Visit our website) https://yourpopfilter.com/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!) Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Terminator 2: Judgement Day Will The Terminator 2: Judgement Day shoot and morph its way to the 1991 Movie of the Year? You’re ten years old and you are about to see your first R-rated movie. You have come out of the wet-garbage heat of the New York summer into the perfectly chilled, popcorn-infused air of the theater. You sit alone — you arrived too late to get seats with your mom — but you don’t care because the Queens crowd has already cohered into one mass of excitement and expectation. The lights go down and the sound this mass makes still gives you chills. What happens next is lost in the hundreds of times I have seen this movie. But that excitement, the quickening before the show, has never left me. This movie is perfect. The music is perfect; the camera work is perfect; it is an action movie that never unnecessarily slows down the action in the name of exposition. It features many of the coolest guns ever set on celluloid. It is the best Arnold Schwarzenegger movie, probably the best Linda Hamilton movie, and maybe the best James Cameron movie. We're not afraid to say it. Most podcasts are full of cowards, but, not here, buddy. Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. However, we cannot. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1991 (Check out the 1991 bracket) https://yourpopfilter.com/ (Visit our website) https://yourpopfilter.com/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!) Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

View Details

Best of the Year: 2021Movie of the Year  What movie will win 2021 Movie of the Year? We have come to the end of the 2021 shows. We have picked the best of music, the best of television, and the best of literature. No, we didn't read enough books to talk about literature, but if we did you can guarantee we'd make a bracky out of those suckers and set them to fighting. But, in all seriousness, we still have the most important element of pop culture to discuss: the movies. Films, talking pictures, flicks -- no matter what you call them, they give us a reason to get out of bed in the morning. Or stay in bed. Like to watch a movie, I guess. The point is: I am tired and would like to go to bed. And no one is half as good at going to bed as this week's very special guest, Colin, from the wildly popular and always fun Scavengers Network. Seriously, this guy is very funny to the point where I'm thinking, "Is this a little much?" But then I'm thinking, "Nah, man. Hey, you're getting a little side-tracked. Focus on the movies." Exactly. We're not talking about how funny Colin is. Or if "Colin"--what do we know about this hilarious stranger, really??--is being brought in to maybe replace someone. Wait. Does the Board think they can just replace us like light bulbs in a, uh, light, or something? Well, guess what? You can't treat us this way. We have rights. I'm a human man, not a light-bulb man. Rights, not lights! Fewer newbies, more movies! But that's not what we're talking about. We are talking about something else entirely: movies. Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1991 (Check out the 1991 bracket) https://yourpopfilter.com/ (Visit our website) https://yourpopfilter.com/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!) Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

View Details

Best of the Year: 2021 TV Drama of the Year What drama will win 2021 TV Drama of the Year? Drama: We're meant to save it for our mommas. But that isn't always possible because we're big kids who live in our own homes with our hot spouses. So instead, we have to face the dramas ourselves. However, the Taste Budz are not brave or competent, so we called the bravest and most competent people we know -- Katelynn and Books from Unnatural 20s. Katelynn is brave because she will approach squirrels in the park, even if she hasn't met them before. Books is brave because she reads books, literally the scariest collections of words.  James from Timeline Scavengers also joins us. James is brave in his own way that he asked us not to share. Succession is fun, sexy, mean, and smart, but does it have the fire power of the Barry Jenkins-directed The Underground Railroad, based on a Pulitzer prize-winning book that special guest James has read? We assume the whole thing. If you say you read a book, it means the whole thing, right? Squid Game had a diabolical grip on pop culture for a minute, but was that long enough to counter the impact of WandaVision, a show people are probably going to have to hear about in grief counseling for the next couple of decades? These are the questions we get to the bottom of on this very special episode. And the only way to know the answers is to listen, to stop what you are doing and take the time to really listen. Thank god real life isn't that way! Make sure to also: https://challonge.com/moty1991 (Check out the 1991 bracket) https://yourpopfilter.com/ (Visit our website) https://yourpopfilter.com/amazon (Use our Amazon page!) http://patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!)) http://facebook.com/yourpopfilter (Like us!) http://twitter.com/yourpopfilter (Follow us!) Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

View Details

Best of the Year: 20212021 TV Comedy of the YearWhat comedy will win 2021 TV Comedy of the Year? Let's face it: making your way in the world today takes everything you got. I just thought of that right now, unprompted, but it occurs to me how true it is. And that's why taking a break from all your worries sure would help a lot. I ask you this now and I want a serious answer: Wouldn't you like to getaway? TV comedy feels like a place where everyone knows your name. But what's more: they're always glad you came. For us, this place is TV comedy. You'd never believe it to listen to our hit podcast--now containing less COVID misinformation than several competitors--but we were never very popular as kids. We tell that to people and they say, 'Yeah, I figured," to cover up how embarrassed they are to not know it already. As unpopular kids, we felt human connection only through TV comedies, and now as unfulfilled adults, we return to them in an attempt to feel some of that "magic" of our youths. But, honestly, the shows are way better now than they were then. I would put The Other Two or What We Do in the Shadows against any of the sitcoms of the 90s, even that one with all the dinosaurs on it. What was that one with all the dinosaurs on it called again? Remember all the characters were dinosaurs and the actors were actually in dinosaurs costumes? Oh yeah, The Dino-Might Comedy Hour with Dr. Dinoculous and the Dino-Dame Dancers.  Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Best of the Year: 20212021 Century of the YearAre you prepared for the madness of Century of the Year? People ask us all the time: What is Century of the Year? And that is a really good question. Century of the Year is where we take the 100 biggest pop-culture stories of the year and talk about each for one minute. Oh, we also take a shot of beer each minute. We cover the highs and lows of the most talked-about stories of 2021. Remember Bean Dad? That happened in 2021! What a fun thing to get to talk about. I bet they are all that fun, the topics. So answering what Century of the year is the easy part, really. The hard part is explaining why we do Century of the Year. Why would we subject ourselves to the mental, and physical, strain that an endeavor like this puts on our aging bodies? And the answer is that we have a crippling addiction to pop culture. We can't seem to get through a day without turning to the calming, mind-numbing effects of sweet-lady popular culture. Sometimes the first thing we do is wake up and go to our secret place where we keep a little pop culture for emergencies and take a big swig of pop culture just to get our hands to stop shaking. But then we just want more pop culture. Join us, won't you, as we welcome listeners to a magical world of light-drinking and binge-discussing like in the salons of old-timey Europe. You're bound to learn something, if only about yourself. And you may get to hear someone puke while discussing Simone Biles. Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Best of the Year:2021 Album of the YearWhich album of 2021 will be our Album of the Year? What can you say about the music of 2021? The songs were epic, shifting, exploratory, and raw with artists like Tyler, The Creator giving us something so new that it was almost a challenge. Newcomer Olivia Rodrigo plumbed the depths of heartbreak while Japanese Breakfast explored the heights of pure joy.  Artists like Arlo Parks and Little Simz dropped albums that were diaries, close, and achingly intimate. The albums were experimental and discordant, pleasing and impressive, and everything we needed in year two of whatever this is. Also, Taylor Swift re-released an old album but made it a whole heck of a lot longer. You may not have heard, but there is a 10-minute track on this one. Ten! Minutes! We are fans of Swift's work here. Big fans. However, this is a lot to ask us to swallow. Ultimately, some of the panelists can forgive this album because it helped TayTay gain control over her own songs, but will the rest of us be able to look past the fact that this is still, in its bones, an old-ass album. When it is all said and done and the shows and movies have had their fun, what really stays? What makes the biggest impression on a year? It has to be the music. Because that is what lives our lives alongside us. We don't watch movies out in the world, but we live with music as our constant companion. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Best of the Year:2021 Mix TapeWill our 2021 mix tape change how music is appreciated? Scientists will refer to 2021 as the Great Time of Music and Song. Experts agree bands like Sleigh Bells and Low have changed everything for rock, while rap and hip-hop took quantum leaps forward with amazing albums from Tyler, The Creator, Little Simz, and Arlo Parks. Can we capture this magical time in music through only the power of mix tape? Listen now and see for yourself! Mix tapes are the single greatest invention in the history of humanity and, frankly, it is not very close. But each mix tape must be carefully crafted. It needs a thesis, a theme, a plot almost. Planning and forethought are the twin watchwords when it comes to the fine art of the mix tape. However, we are bad at those things. Instead of planning or forethought we opted to just sorta chuck a playlist together and hope it captures the spirt of 2021. And what was 2021 if not 2020 persisting? Covid was still big, greed was still religion, and those two Democrats were still Republicans. Modern times are about celebrating the fact that everyone gets to enjoy the apocalypse in whatever way they see most fitting.  We capture that spirit by doing whatever we feel like with this playlist and then giving ourselves a lot of credit for it. 2021 was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. However, we cannot. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 2021Oscar DraftWhich films will get the most 2021 Oscar nominations? The Oscars. When it comes to little statues handed to movie stars, the absolute top of the table. 2021 had movies galore, and many of them were terrific. But will the academy know which movies to award? Their record on this is spotty at best and disastrous at worst, leading to a feeling that ultimately the Oscars don't even matter anymore. Let us be clear, this is a mostly correct position held by cool people. But if you love pop-culture you still have to talk about the Oscars, even if only to roll your eyes and sigh while pointing out that, yeah, they blew it again. Remember Crash? Remember Green Book? Gross. And we are to pop-culture what Britney was 4 U: a slave. So, yeah, we're gonna talk about the Oscars. They're not the Brunos! Encanto is so great, right? However, around here we can't talk about a subject without making it into a weird game that hurts my feelings but I hide the hurt and NEVER let it show because Greg is Mommy's brave boy and if he can't hold in his feelings then the whole world could fall apart. Again, Encanto is such a great movie, isn't it? No one has ever beaten Ryan at this game or even gotten a second-place that felt worth a gosh darn, but the panel came prepared this time. We've done the research; we know the angles; and we're ready to take down Ryan, our sensei of cinema. All that and more on this week's episode!   Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 2021Preview Show - Television

Greg and Mackenna lead the Taste Buds in a battle of the Sweet 16 Dramas and Comedies...there can only be 8! In part two of the preview show that kicks it all off, 8 great television dramas, and 8 hilarious comedies, will lose their chance to be named the PopFilter Best of the Year! First up, Greg from Movie of the Year, and host of the upcoming Best of the Year: TV Comedy, leads a panel to take 16 of the year's most important comedies and cut 8 of them. Can Apple TV finally make a dent in the bracket with Dickinson and Mythic Quest? Is all of this bracketing moot because Tim Robinson is an unstoppable monster? Will new Hulu comedy Reservation Dogs make it further than last year's bracket winner What We Do in the Shadows? Then Mackenna from Unnatural 20's takes over and leads the Taste Buds through Best Drama of the year. Will a comic book-based drama make it to the Elite 8, or will WandaVision, Invincible, and Loki all go home empty-handed? Will the number one seed Succession get booted right away? How will the 2021 breakout hit Squid Game fare? Is pitting all of these shows together basically creating a Squid Game with television shows? 

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: Best of 2021Preview Show Albums and MoviesWhich are the best 2021 albums and movies? You judge a year in a lot of ways: Who was famous? Who was hot? Who was on their way up? And what was going on with that unending pandemic? Yes! All these questions are the standard ones you ask about any year; however, these questions won't give us the true nature of that year--the warp and the weave of the every day, the "stuff" of life that gave the days their unique illumination. No, the soul of a year isn't in these places. The true soul of a year in the art. (Let that sink in. Hey, wait, reader, wait a little longer to let that sink in. Too long, move on, weirdo.) The lifeblood of any year is found in the books, theater, short non-fiction...no, I'm kidding. What is this Best of 1821? It's in the music; it's on the silver screen. So, to talk about the true soul of 2021, we have gathered our good friends, The Unnatural 20's, as we attempt to whittle down our brackets of the best sixteen albums (movies for your ears) and movies (albums upon the screen) to a more manageable eight per show. It's hard and here's why. There are so many good albums and movies that we have to just casually throw to the side. People worked on these things and we're just like, "the cymbals were too splashy on the intro track," and then we seriously never mention it again. Part of what is tough about being a critic is it causes you to become a little critical if I'm honest.   Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991State of the FranchiseHow impactful were 1991 movie franchises? Hit movie franchises are literally all this country has left. Is that hyperbolic? Let me check. No. No, it isn't.  Everything else is gone. In this vast wasteland, there is only one thing of value left: blockbuster movie franchises. But was it always this way? Scientists have told us the answer, and it is a resounding "nah, not so much." In the early nineties, there were film franchises but they they were largely bound by a quantity-or-quality metric where having more than three movies in your franchise was a sign that it was now, or always had been, trash for pig people. Well, oink oink, because we are jamming our porcine snouts deep into that trough, and we won't stop eating until we've consumed every movie franchise that made 1991 a year to remember. And what was 1991 if not the 80s persisting? Shoulders were still big, greed was still religion, and Democrats were still Republicans. Nineteen-Eighty-Eleven straddled two times, and so its movies often looked in both directions as well. Although, as we covered in the GenreBlast episode, the future-looking movies of science fiction were awful at this time. With one exception that I need not even mention here but is yes in fact Terminator 2: Judgement day thank you for asking. Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. However, we cannot. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Point Break (Bonus Episode) 

Does Point Break have what it takes to shame the 1991 Movie of the Year? Movies of the early 90’s could be about either extreme sports OR bank robbery. Point Break invites us to imagine a magical world where those streams cross and combine to give us one PERFECT movie. That's right. We think this is one of the best movies of all time, and we aren't afraid to gush about it. Keanu Reeves is Johnny Utah, fresh-faced FBI agent and one-time college football star with the trick knee to prove it. Patrick Swayze is Bhodi, the adrenaline junkie-slash-guru-slash-criminal who wants to teach Johnny about the spiritual side of surfing. Also along for the journey is Gary Busey, who seemingly wandered onto the set and was filmed trying to talk his way into two different meatball subs. A character named Johnny Utah, a pit bull thrown like a weapon in the midst of a 10-minute chase, Gary Busey’s character nearly missing a bank robbery because he was laughing too hard at the funnies—This is a straight-up comedy, right? Is there any other way to interpret this movie than as satire? Also, we ask: How much does the plot make sense, and is it okay if it’s zero? Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. However, we cannot. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Mix TapeWill our 1991 mixtape change how music is appreciated? Scientists still refer to 1991 as the Great Time of Music and Song. Experts agree bands like Nirvana changed everything for rock, while rap and hip-hop took quantum leaps forward. Can we capture this magical time in music through only the power of mixtape? Listen now and see for yourself! Mixtapes are the single greatest invention in the history of humanity and, frankly, it is not very close. But each mixtape must be carefully crafted. It needs a thesis, a theme, a plot almost. Planning and forethought are the twin watchwords when it comes to the fine art of the mixtape. However, we are bad at those things. Instead of planning or forethought, we opted to just sorta chuck a playlist together and hope it captures the spirit of this season's year: 1991. And what was 1991 if not the 80s persisting? Shoulders were still big, greed was still religion, and Democrats were still Republicans. Nineteen-Eighty-Eleven straddled two times, and so its music looked backward as it dared to leap forward. We capture that spirit by doing whatever we feel like with this playlist and then giving ourselves a lot of credit for it. Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. However, we cannot. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991The Silence of the LambsWill The Silence of the Lambs thrill and chill its way to the 1991 Movie of the Year? The Silence of the Lambs (1991) was the third film in Academy history to win the "Big Five" Academy Awards for producing, directing, acting, and screenwriting following It Happened One Night (1934) and One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975). So we're dealing with Hollywood divinity here. Despite--or maybe because of??--its gory subject matter, it enjoyed success when it was released and remains popular today. Hannibal Lecter, Buffalo Bill, Clarice Starling, and all their sundry hijinks have a footprint in pop culture that is far bigger than the viewership of the actual movie. Parodying its scenes became a staple of reference-comedy for years, and is still a go to. Maybe because the movie features so many fun voices to imitate. The FBI pairs a unique team of a raw cadet—Starling—and an imprisoned serial killer—Lecter—and set them on a task to stop another serial killer—Buffalo Bill—who is skinning women to wear as a suit. Everyone learns about themselves, faces get eaten, and one serial killer is stopped while another is freed to go on vacation and catch up with some old friends. Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. However, we cannot. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991JFK Will JFK shame the 1991 Movie of the Year? In many ways 1991 gave us our most normal, run-of-the-mill, norm core movies. Well, I am here to say thank gosh for the bonus shows because here we are with JFK—half weird YouTube video essay, half historian's fever dream, and every bit of three freaking hours. Not normal, no, and certainly not running any mills. But still full of so many things to talk about and compelling mysteries to attempt to unravel.  JFK invites us to imagine a crazy world where the CIA boops the president on the snoot in front of the heckin nation and then does an epic fail covering it up. The investigation into what really happened takes Kevin Coster--as himself--from New Orleans to Washington and back again as he unravels a mystery involving the CIA, the Mafia, and the mighty dragon of the military industrial complex itself.  By the end we may be more confused as to what actually happened than we were before, but the one thing we’ll not be able to deny is that we are through the looking glass here, people….all the way through… And if you don't believe me, tune in! Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. However, we cannot. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Beauty and the Beast Will Beauty and the Beast be the 1991 Movie of the Year? Beauty and the Beast is the story of...uh...I mean is there ANY reason to give a recap of this movie? We all know what it is about, we all have seen it probably a million times, and we all know how good it is. But do you though? When was the last time you REALLY watched it? This movie is amazing in just about every way a movie can be. It also has many, apparent, problematic elements, which we will get to, but before we do, we let ourselves rave for a bit. Because this movie is not just  good, not just great, but full-on, no-doubt, shut-up amazing. The art is majestic. The music is iconic. And the voice acting is peerless. For all these reasons and more the movie was the first animated feature to be nominated for Best Picture. But no one cares if it wins best picture or not, that's small beans. The biggest bean out there is still up for grabs: 1991's Movie of the Year! Beauty and the Beast has a real shot here, friends. And if you don't believe me, tune in! Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. However, we cannot. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991GenreBlast 1991 GenreBlast is here to save all the genre films we forgot about? Genre films get a really bad wrap. Why should a perfect comedy, sci fi film, or romantic flick get automatically consigned to the ash heap of any of your various Blocksbuster Video. Maybe you're a young, hip guy who knows a surprising amount about the action/sci fi masterpiece Highlander 2: The Quickening, but because that is a genre flick, all of your sweet knowledge is worth less than nothing. Perhaps you do a spot-on impression of Martin Short's hopefully non-problematic wedding planner from the hit comedy Father of This Bride, like no one cares about that because that character was not in Greenbook. However, we won't stand for the way genre films are disrespected, especially by the likes of us. And we're among the worst offenders, so it is our duty to podcast our way out of this. We need to be good to the movies like Pointbreak, which combines the majesty of surfing with the majesty of a young Keanu Reeves. What about the Robin Williams masterpiece Hook? A lot of people think Hook is not a masterpiece; however, those people are a lot like Robin Williams's character, Peter Pan, at the start of the movie. Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. However, we cannot. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Boyz n the Hood Will Boyz n the Hood be the 1991 Movie of the Year? This week the Taste Buds tackle John Singleton's Boyz n the Hood, film full of debuts, nuance, tragedy, and the natural rhythms of real life. In a way, it bears more in common with the films of 1975. It was a big movie in 1991--the year's most profitable, in fact--but does it have what it takes to be 1991's Movie of the Year? Boyz n the Hood is a story about the inner city violence of the 90s. Something I am sure, without checking, we have figured out the solution to by now. I am going to reach into my big bag of 91 tricks and guess that we solved this with more policing and longer jail terms in the intervening years? That has to have done it. In the movie, we follow Tre, and half brothers Doughboy and Ricky, as they each try to survive and thrive in an increasingly desolate urban landscape blighted by redlining, gang violence, predatory businesses, and a complete paucity of hope. And like a Shakespearean tragedy we can see the end coming, but it can’t inure us to the human pain, as Ricky is gunned down in the absolute prime of his young life. The cycle of violence continues and we are left to ponder if getting out is the only hope left.  Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. However, we cannot. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Barton Fink Can Barton Fink write his way to the 1991 Movie of the Year? The Tastebuds have quite an odd movie on our hands with this one. Barton Fink is our first Coen Brothers' movie, but it is hardly the typical Co-Bro fair. Barton Fink is a young, successful playwright on Broadway before he is lured/kinda coerced to going to Hollywood. And the city of dreams quickly becomes the city of nightmares as Barton is plagued by writer’s block, manic Hollywood execs, a pushy-but-nice-seeming Dan Conner from the hit show The Conners, and what I assume is just one very effective mosquito? Tasked with writing a wrestling picture, Barton can’t seem to connect to the content even though he purports to love the common man and enlists the help of Frasier’s dad. After some tossed salad and scrambled eggs, Fink Frenches Frasier’s dad’s wife...uh maybe he doesn’t--that part’s not clear, but what is clear is that she gets killed as hell somehow and now on top of everything he’s being stalked by the law. It all ends much as you ‘d expect with the weird neighbor gunning people down while screaming look upon me as the world bursts into flames. This movie really looks ahead to our own time, huh? Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. We can't though. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991The Addams Family

Can The Addams Family spook and kook their way to the 1991 Movie of the Year? They do what they want to do. Say what they want to say. Live how they want to live. Play how they want to play. Dance how they want to dance. And even kick and then slap a friend. Yes, I am speaking of the Addams family, that spooky bunch who taught us that love and raw sexual energy truly conquer all. But will this movie conquer our bracket? We loved it as kids, and especially loved its sequel. However, it remains to be seen if a kids movie can win it all, even if it has the blessings of the Dark Pope. Based on a series of single panel cartoons from the New Yorker and more directly based on a couple of attempts at a TV show, The Addams Family introduces us to the Addams family of monsters and killers who we like because they have a profound insouciance and also the parents are nonstop sexual dynamos who remind us that it’s good to be alive, even if we are undead. (Are they undead? We get into it.) Here we get the family as they vibe, murder people, and attempt to reconnect with who they think is uncle fester, but is actually a con man who looks like uncle fester who is actually uncle fester, spoilers. Nineteen and ninety-one. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. We can't though. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991Premiere Part 2

Which of these 1991 movies will be the Movie of the Year? We are back with even more bracket to help us pick the movies for the 1991 season of Movie of the Year! Silence of the Lambs, Boyz n the Hood, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, Hook -- some of these may move on, some may be voted out, but all will be shouted about. Because this isn't like naming your kid: it's a big decision. (That's just an example.) You can't just think of your favorite comic book character and pick a name here. (Again, random example.) No, you have to actually think about it and come up with the eight movies that best represent the year 1991 and, much more importantly, the state of cinema in 1991. '91 was a different time, in some ways better, but that's mostly because this is the worst possible time in the worst possible timeline, so basically any time randomly selected is guaranteed to be better. Is that a slight exaggeration? I'm going to go with no because once I say something, even if it was totally off the cuff and unconsidered, I will then fight to the death to prove to myself that I am right to believe that thing I just randomly said in an offhand way. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. We can't though. We can only move forward. Because we are podcasters, and bravely moving into the future is all we know how to do. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1991A New Season Begins

Movie of the Year begins the long journey of picking the 1991 Movie of the Year! 1991 is amazing because that is when everyone everywhere was 10-years-old and the world was still something to be excited about. Sure, it was a changing place, but it was changing for the better. We had won the cold war and our way of life emerged victorious and unchallenged. And oh were there movies! Movies about how if robots were going to try to kill us, they might also try to save us. Movies about how the real weirdos aren't the killers who live down the street and dig up their relatives for fun, but instead the scammers and liars who try to steal those weirdos' fortunes by pretending to be their long lost family member. And of course films about backdraft. We start with a field of 64 movies and we get cutting and keep cutting until we have only 16 left. We'll reduce that 16 to the Elite Eight next week. That means in this episode alone you will hear nearly 50 movies get das boot. Many of these movies we will never mention again, but some of the cuts on this episode are truly painful, including the one I gave myself trying to get into a can of beans. It was a magical time full of promise and wonder and we have to go back. Something went wrong and now we're thirty years removed from '91 and things have gotten doinked in the worst possible way. All of that, and somehow more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1991 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975A Winner Declared

Movie of the Year declares 1975's Movie of the Year! It all comes down to this. We started with the top sixty-four movies of 1975, and we whittled them down to the final four in this episode, where we decide on the 1975 winner. Dog Day Afternoon, Mirror, Jaws, and One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest: Each of these legendary movies is almost bigger than film itself. Every one of them is in the pantheon of filmic gods. However, there can be only one Movie of the Year (Highlander, rules). Every choice in this episode is agonizing. But if the choices were easy, we wouldn't have dedicated so much of our lives to them. Oh, wow, did we spend way too much of our lives trying to figure out the 1975 winner? No. We didn't. Or at least don't think about it. We also give out a ton of our highly prized (by Hollywood, not us, we're over them) Mooties, including Best Sex. Come for the discussion about the best movies ever made, stay for the part where we gab about doin it. (We all have done it; not together, sorry). Best Violence is also being handed out on this show, so if you're a big weirdo you'll wanna stick around for that. Did any of the movies of '75 even feature violence though? We'll have to get our fact-checkers on this. Remember: These awards are given to the best and the worst of the motion picture industry and are highly sought after despite being both deeply cursed and profoundly haunted. All of that, and some more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975The Penultimate Episode

Movie of the Year begins the process of picking 1975's Movie of the Year! Our finales are so big, so bombastic, so utterly and completely over-the-top that we don't do you the disservice of trying to cram it all into just one episode. This isn't amateur hour. We are not jerks. Instead, like the (unpaid) pros we are, we set our sights on narrowing the field in this episode--from the 8 movies we watched and discussed this season, down to the sacred final 4. That's right, we take 4 of the best movies of the year and declare them definitely NOT 1975's Movie of the Year. It's hard work but we do it. And the remaining 4 movies will be made all the stronger for it. When we started this season with Barry Lyndon, we thought we'd never get sick of talking about the movies of 1975. That was many, many months ago. In the time since then, we have covered every theatrical release of that year and even some made-for-TV stuff that you wouldn't wish upon your worst enemy. What's that? I'm being told that that is a huge lie and that no one can interrupt articles because of the way time and writing works. Those are both good things to know. Apologies. We also give out a ton of our highly prized (by Hollywood, not us, we're over it) Mooties. These awards are given to the best and the worst of the motion picture industry and are highly sought after despite being haunted. All of that, and absolutely more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Salo, or 120 Days of Sodom

The Taste Buds end the season with the most bonus of all bonus episodes, Salo, or 120 Days of Sodom! It is time. They have watched dozens of films for the 1975 season, but there was one that they couldn't avoid. First, Mike and Ryan are tasked with finding someone who will do the show with them, and the only person who would say yes was Mackenna from Unnatural 20's. So think about that, the next time you listen to the Unnatural 20's. Salo tells the story of a group of men who collect and kidnap a group of young boys and girls to fulfill their every (mostly sexual) needs. The movie is legendary for the amount of grossness it puts on screen, including rape, tortue, poo eating, eye stabbing, and ugly wedding dresses. If you've always wanted to see Salo, but didn't think you had the stomach, let these three depraved jerks tell you what happens, and STILL attempt to analyze the movie! Listen today and get a ton of ideas for your next family reunion! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 19753 Days of the Condor

Movie of the Year discusses 1975's spy thriller 3 Days of the Condor! 3 Days of the Condor is a movie before its time in many ways. Starring a young, pre-Presidential, Robert Redford as a CIA agent who specializes in reading books to see if the dorks are up to anything yet. Well, I guess they are because before you can say boo a whole office of nice CIA people are killed for doing nothing more than trying to keep America and all her foreign oil safe for future generations. This leads the CIA agent to do literally the only thing you can do in this situation: kidnap the most attractive woman in a sporting goods store and begin to use your reading skills to get her to fall in love with you while you figure out this other thing with the spies and the getting shot at. Remember that guy that lived in the tree on Game of Thrones who was also briefly in the beginning of the least bad recent Star War? That guy is in this movie and he is even better than when he was the tree or the old tent guy that got got by big daddy baby vader. Max von Sydow. That's the guy's name but I was playing it cool because I thought maybe you wouldn't know. "She'll always be a Princes to me." That guy. And he plays Bloodraven on Game of Thrones. I know that too but it's a little inside baseball. All of that, and probably more, on an all-new PopFilter Podcast! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Pop Filter: A Decade of ExcellenceMix Tape of the Decade

YourPopFilter celebrates 11 years of podcasts by creating the mixtape of the decade! Behind all out amazing success of the last decade, there was always a song playing or a beat dropping. We came to see this music as the soundtrack to our meteoric rise to the somewhere on the podcasting mountain. How cruel would it be to withhold this music from you, our most special fans and supporters? We kick things off with Beyoncé and husband Jay-Z and their hit track "Drunk in Love" just to get the mood started. And the picks only get better, and wilder, from there. Did you know that Beyoncé's husband was also in music? That's so cool! Kawinky, please meet my friend Dink, amirite? Mostly though we talk about songs that have really moved us, both emotionally and physically, which that second one can be really hard. We're big boys and thus not wont to feel or move in any way that might push us beyond the bounds of comfort. Comfort is king and we are all merely its subjects. But it's not enough to just hear us squawking and baby-birding our opinions to you. No, we had to call in the Unnatural 20's to remind us we are old and the things we like are profoundly stupid. They never show up without reminding us that we are much closer to death than they are, which is a shitty flex at this point what with the future being completely fudged. Like call the keebler elves cuz everything is only getting more fudged. Image how bad the world will be when you're in your 70s vs when I am in mine! Ha! Boom!   Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Shampoo

Movie of the Year discusses 1975's Shampoo! Shampoo is one of those movies they only made for a brief period in the 70s where people just sort of mill around in luxury and go through the motions of decadent life while never really getting to enjoy any of that decadence. In it Warren Beatty plays hair-stylist and "stick man" George, who bounces between his romantic entanglements with the whip-crack ricochet one might more expect to see in 1975 bonus episode subject, Tommy. Which is to say, this man is pinballing between woman, and that's about all he has time for apparently. And so for a movie about a hair stylist, there isn't actually that much hair styling. Speaking of the hair, it is like the collars: as big as they could get, baby. With all this going for it, how will we be able to pick between this movie and all the other ultra-eligible movies? That's a great question and I couldn't be more happy that you asked. To make this awful choice, we did what we always do and made the movies fight it out to see which was the most deserving of our love. It's how we live. It's how we love. And it's how we laugh.  There are almost no easy decisions on this show: every movie is the best movie of its respective year, so to chose between them is painful and awful. But how often do we find truest pleasure in the very heart of pain? How can you drink from one without tasting the other? All of that, and probably more, on an all-new PopFilter Podcast! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Pop Filter: A Decade of ExcellencePop Culture of the Decade

YourPopFilter celebrates 11 years of podcasts by choosing the best piece of pop culture of the last decade! Pop culture is what we do here. It's in the blood. And we know how to make the tough decisions that others are simply unwilling--or perhaps unable--to make. How can a movie square off against an album? How do you compare a TV comedy to a TV drama? These are questions that would cause lesser podcasts to quail, but they bring out the hawk in us. And like mighty hawks, we swoop in to make these kills with the grace you'd expect from hungry birds. We are hungry for decisiveness. We are eating up opinions. But it's not enough to just hear us squawking and baby-birding our opinions to you. No, we had to call in the Unnatural 20's to remind us we are old and the things we like are profoundly stupid. They never show up without reminding us that we are much closer to death than they are, which is a shitty flex at this point what with the future being completely fudged. Like call the keebler elves cuz everything is only getting more fudged. Image how bad the world will be when you're in your 70s vs when I am in mine! Ha! Boom! You ever think of that? How the world will actively get worse as your body and mind do as well. So when you are least able to survive it, that's when things will be as bad as they have ever been. Seems bad idk. All of that, and probably more, on an all-new PopFilter Podcast! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Pop Filter: A Decade of ExcellenceTV Drama of the Decade

YourPopFilter celebrates 11 years of podcasts by choosing the best TV drama of the last decade! TV is movies right in your own living room. Especially the TV dramas of the last 11-year decade. Why a decade of eleven years? Well, counting is hard when the world is trying to find new ways to end every day. But the world racing towards its own fiery destruction is actually one of the reasons we need TV dramas now more than ever: let's just be sad about what happens in the box and not in the real world that surrounds that box? Why worry about your own failing health or disordered relationship with drugs when you could instead think about Breaking Bad? And you'll never have to face the horrible toll misogyny has wrought if you instead focus on this faults of Donny Drapes and his fellow Mad Men. As you can tell, we are a comedy podcast and we have friends (we definitely have friends) so we asked some of them, the high-rollers at the Unnatural 20's, to come help us pick which drama was the best, and/or the biggest, part of the last decade. We have the Unatty 20's on to remind ourselves, and the audience, that simply having taste is not sufficient to pick the most important drama, you must also have the support of younger, nicer, fundamentally better people. We get a little heated on this one, we raise our voices, Taylor shuns us for an entire segment, and a baby makes her podcast debut!  All of that, and more, on an all-new PopFilter Podcast! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Picnic at Hanging Rock

The Taste Buds continue their journey through 1975 with another bonus episode, this time about Peter Weir's Picnic at Hanging Rock! On an all-new episode of Movie of the Year: 1975, the Taste Buds discuss Picnic at Hanging Rock. Host Ryan, along with Taste Buds Greg and Van, dive into the movie that kicked off the Australian New Wave of the 1970's. And this movie is Australian as fudge...sort of. The movie tells the story of a small girl's prep school, who take a titular picnic to a titular Hanging Rock. After some good old-fashioned outbackin', three students and a teacher mysteriously disappear. Will this be an issue for the rest of the school? You bet! So it's very Australian, because it shows how the outdoors is dangerous, but it also doesn't feel Australian, because of its languid pacing and severe lack of dudes playing fire guitars on driving cars. Australia: land of many things. Also, none of the picnickers discuss Fosters, which is Australian for beer, so how Australian can the movie really be, anyway? The Taste Buds try to crack the movie open like a can of the aforementioned Fosters (Australian for beer) by trying to get down to what director Peter Weir was really doing here. What was he trying to say by focusing on schoolgirls at the turn of the century? They also discuss the sexiness - or lack thereof - of the movie. The girls are being kept from sex and sexy thoughts in every conceivable way. Is this really a good idea? Society has never really been able to trick young girls into completely forgetting about the concept of sex...though it might work for this school. Finally, this Weir f#$@er doesn't even explain where the girls went! Is that something that keeps it from being great? Get the definitive answers to these questions, and so much more, on an all-new Movie of the Year!!! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975The Yakuza

The Taste Buds continue their journey through 1975 with Sydney Pollack's The Yakuza! On an all-new bonus episode of Movie of the Year, The Taste Buds keep trying to watch every movie that came out in 1975 with The Yakuza! Robert Mitchum and Ken Takakura team up to take down the entire Japanese mob, and discover what it means to be a man. Or, at least, what they thought it meant to be a man in 1975. In between shootouts and swordfights, this budding friendship will also deal with the women they love, the fashion of the time, and some kickass tattoos. Host Mike, along with his friends Ryan and Greg, try to contextualize a movie that isn't just old-fashioned for today, but probably even a little old-fashioned for the time. They discuss the culture clashes, and what the movie is trying to say about masculinity. And, if it all goes well, they might just learn a little about each other. With Ryan a clear Robert Mitchum-type, and Greg an obvious Kan Takakura-type, Mike will discover he has the most important role of all: being neither one of them. Tune in, stream, AND download, to see if they once again cracked this mother open, or if they are stumped for the first time ever! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Pop Filter: A Decade of ExcellenceMovie of the Decade

YourPopFilter celebrates 11 years of podcasts by choosing the best movie of the last decade! Movies are, conservatively, the best thing to happen to humanity in the history of time. And who better to help us tackle the onerous task of picking one of the best movies of the last 11 years than the Unnatural 20's, podcasting's answer to the question: who are the funniest, nicest, best people you know? Movies are like friends that can't hear you or help you, but do have a lot going on which helps give you something to take your mind off of the almost non-stop pain of existence. In many ways, the movies of the last decade taught us about cinema, but more importantly, they taught us a little something about life. Life is also the name of a movie, but it is not one we discuss on this show. Reminder: this is a show about good movies. To make this awful choice, we did what we always do and made the movies fight it out to see which was the most deserving of our love. It's how we live. It's how we love. And it's how we laugh.  There are almost no easy decisions on this show: every movie is the best movie of its respective year, so to chose between them is painful and awful. But how often do we find truest pleasure in the very heart of pain? How can you drink from one without tasting the other? All of that, and probably more, on an all-new PopFilter Podcast! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Rollerball

The 1975 bonus episodes continue with Norman Jewison's Rollerball, starring James Caan! On an all-new bonus episode of the 1975 season, the Taste Buds turn their sights to that infamous look at the future of sports, Rollerball! In the not-so-distant future, sports will be played on 2x2 roller skates, they will be played internationally, and they will be played to the death! Rollerball, as silly as it may seem now, actually predicted a lot of what would happen with professional sports between '75 and today, including the uptick in violence, and the corporations moving in and taking over. James Caan plays Jonathan E., the best rollerballer in the sport's history. But his time has come, and the rich people that run the league want him out. They've already taken his wife...next, they'll take his life! Will he step down, or will he kill Japanese people to get back at his owners? Host Mike, along with Movie of the Year mainstays Greg and Ryan, along with The Unnatural 20's Katelynn, try to look at this '75 cult classic from a 2021 perspective. Does the predictive nature of the film help cover up some of its flaws? Will the pacing turn off these '21 kids and their addled attention spans? And how does Norman Jewison, a director not known for sports movies, do with the Rollerball scenes. Tune in to this all-new episode to find out the answers to these questions, and so much more! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Pop Filter: A Decade of ExcellenceTV Comedy of the Decade

YourPopFilter celebrates 11 years of podcasts by choosing the best TV comedy of the last decade! TV comedies are some of the greatest things we've got. They help us to forget our troubles and sit back and get lost in a dream world of funny jokes. They do that, right? Some, yes, but the TV best TV comedies of the last decade are about using humor to deal with the most terrible experiences life can throw at you. Take This May Destroy You, which builds its comedy around the horrors, humiliations, and nightmare confusions that come with sexual assault. Or look at My Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, which uses music as well as comedy to soften the blow of what is ultimately the story of a mentally ill woman's life falling apart (and about how she drags a few of the nearest lives down with her). We are once again joined by some of the most important figures in the history of Pop Filter, Taylor, and then also the Unnatural 20's, as usual. We feel comfortable having them on because although they are funnier than we are, their opinions are objectively worse than ours. They'd be the first to tell you, not that you should take their word for it. But they come in on this one and do the thing where they ruin the show but then that actually makes the show a lot better? And then they act like they're not totally trying to do that and succeeding. They're kinda genius in that way. All of that, and thankfully more, on an all-new PopFilter Podcast! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Night Moves

The 1975 bonus episodes continue with Arthur Penn's Night Moves, starring Gene Hackman! On an all-new bonus episode of Movie of the Year: 1975, the Taste Buds take on Night Moves! Join your host Kate, along with the Movie of the Year regulars Mike, Ryan, and Greg, as they introduce newcomer Even to the PopFilter family, as they all discuss this neo-noir starring Gene Hackman! Gene Hackman plays ex-athlete/current private investigator Harry Moseby who is trying to find the missing daughter of a has-been movie actress. Unluckily for us, and luckily for him, finding the young woman, played by a JUST BARELY old enough Melanie Griffith, is really just the beginning of the story. Part The Long Goodbye/part classic noir - with maybe the slightest bit of The Naked Gun thrown in - Night Moves is, among many other things, a chance to miss Gene Hackman. Will the overall mystery work for the Taste Buds? Will the exploitation of women that the movie tackles sort of just make Night Moves come off as an exploitative movie? And does Gene Hackman remain the most underrated actor of the last 50 years? Tune in and find out! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Mixtape

The Taste Buds make a playlist of all the funky jams of 1975! 1975 was a weird time, in both the world at large and the world of music. If you look at the top of the Billboard chart, it's a who's-who of pee-yew: stinky, that is. But the Billboard charts of the time are a lot like a slice of anchovy pizza: gross at the top yet better the lower you go. Is that even a thing anymore, anchovy pizza? We got so riled about the whole pineapple pizza quagmire, but dang anchovy is the grossest pizza bar none. Okay, they're gonna kill me for this being so wildly off-topic, but what can I say? We pick only the best songs of 1975, and we put them into the greatest playlist you are ever going to hear. We have the Unnatural 20's on, we have Taylor back, and we're picking only the best tunes of one of the better years in music history. Why are you still even reading this? Give me a break, jeez! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Like the theme song? Check out more Shady Monk! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975The Man Who Would Be King

The Taste Buds tackle that wacky colonialism classic, The Man Who Would Be King! On an all-new bonus episode of Movie of the Year, some of your favorite Taste Buds are discussing The Man Who Would Be King! John Huston's classic stars Sean Connery and Michael Caine as two white dudes who decide to find a group of people in a far-off land that they can rule over. And they find them and become kings and gods. But what goes up must come down, and eventually, the hubris of our two leading lads catches up to them. Thankfully. Otherwise, this movie would have been even more awkward. Hosted by Movie of the Year stud Mike, and also featuring fellow MOTY panelists Greg and Ryan, along with Unnatural 20's star Mackenna, aka Books, this podcast episode attempts to crack open what may end up being the most controversial movie of the year. Is this the last old movie of the Hollywood studio system? Or a modern, revisionist version of the "white savior" tale. And will the Taste Buds be able to look at it with a lens that the film wants them to, or will their 2021 sensibilities block their enjoyment? Tune in and find out! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Tommy

The Taste Buds continue their journey through 1975 with The Who's Tommy! On a very special bonus episode of Movie of the Year, MOTY regulars Mike and Ryan invite their other two favorite people onto the show: their wives. That's right, it's a good old-fashioned mano y womano y mano y womano battle, and the winner gets their opinions of the movie Tommy to be the official ones. And this is going to be a brutal show because one couple really liked it, and one couple really didn't. When the dust settles, will they move closer to the center, or will they be even further apart? Tommy is of course based on The Who's rock opera of the same name, which tells the story of a "deaf, dumb, and blind kid" (their words) who becomes the greatest pinball player of all time, on his way to becoming something along the lines of the next messiah, if only for a short time. On this episode, The Taste Couplez discuss if Tommy still holds up in 2021, particularly in regards to its commentary on religion and the pinball community at large. They also pick their favorite musical performances and which guest stars they liked the most. All of that, and so much more, on an all-new Movie of the Year bonus show! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Mirror

Mirror is the most obscure movie of our 1975 season, but does it have what it takes to win Movie of the Year? Mirror is an Andrei Tarkovsky film, which means that it is dense, difficult, and ultimately very rewarding. Listening to a podcast about that same movie though? Fun, easy-peasy, and probably more rewarding. Also, listening to our podcast will help you to sound smart about Mirror because you can make fun of our opinions. In this episode we discuss how a viewer might approach a challenging movie like this. It can be a complicated endeavor, take it from us. To give a brains a break, we do a shopping spree of quality items from the movie. Savvy listeners will hear the origin of the tank Ryan has been spotted drifting in lately.  Plus, we'll hand out some awards! All of that, and usually more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Nashville

The Taste Buds discuss 1975's classic Altman film Nashville, on an all-new Movie of the Year! On an all-new episode of Movie of the Year, the Taste Buds continue their off-bracket conversations with Nashville! Maybe the most shocking movie to not be in the Elite 8, the Taste Buds will have to contend with the movie already being kicked out. Was this the worst decision in this podcast's history? Or is Nashville a little too...Altman-esque to actually contend for Movie of the Year. Led by host Kate, Taste Buds Mike, Ryan, Greg, and new team member Van will have to reckon with all 3 hours and 75 songs in this epic, as they discuss the gender roles, generation roles, and as many parts of the ensemble as time will allow. The movie starts with a brag about how it has almost 30 main characters, and then proceeds to actually have all of them, many of them more fleshed out than characters in movies with a fraction of the amount. Listen in as the Taste Buds discuss which characters affected them the most, which ones left them a little dry, and all of the ones in between, on an all-new episode of Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Monty Python and the Holy Grail is the biggest comedy of 1975, but does it have what it takes to win Movie of the Year? Monty Python and the Holy Grail is a comedy classic. We are a comedy-slash-movie podcast, so this must be a match made in heaven, right? Well, it sounds like panelist Greg had a big ol sip of his grumpy juice because he is bringing the HATE. But Ryan and Mike, best friends, are here to set him straight as the buds discuss the legend and legacy of Holy Grail.  This movie may have been made for a song (or a lot of songs) but it has endured for over 40 years because of its timeless comedy, and it has endured despite its unusual structure, both of which we break down. Then, just to get things steamy, we start some hot boy talk, where we pick the steamiest men of a time when men were men, and the hot ones were, well, kinda weird looking. Plus, we'll hand out some awards! All of that, and unavoidably more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Death Race 2000

The Taste Buds discuss the low-budget classic Death Race 2000! The Taste Buds are continuing their trek through 1975, and there was just too many movies to fit everything into the bracket. So throughout the 1975 season, some of the Taste Buds are doing bonus shows of movies that didn't quite make the elite 8, but still deserve to be talked about. This week, the Friends turn their sights to Death Race 2000, the low-budget classic from Roger Corman's production house! Join Movie of the Year panelists Greg, Mike, and Ryan, along with PopFilter veteran Taylor Wilhite, as they break down the greatest prediction of what the year 2000 would be like. In the year 2000, the country is run by a fascist dictator who keeps his citizens happy by creating the Death Race, a race across America, where the drivers rack up points for the different types of people they murder along the way. Those drivers include Frankenstein, played by David Carradine, just after he finished Kung Fu, and Machine Fun Joe Viterbo, played by a pre-Rocky Sylvester Stallone. Throughout the race, the movie tackles just about every theme you can, from terrible governments to the terrible media! Join the Taste Buds, as they decide if this '75 fun, or kind of a drag! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Pop Filter: A Decade of ExcellenceAlbum of the Decade

YourPopFilter celebrates 11 years of podcasts by choosing the most important album of the last decade! Nothing defines a decade like its albums. Maybe the kids don't like them as much anymore. Heck, maybe they're not hip, but darn it they're important. Plus, the last decade had some of our favorite artists making some of our favorite albums. Dirty Computer, by Janelle Monae; Lemonade, by Beyoncé; and Fetch the Bolt Cutters, by Fiona Apple; just to name a few. These albums helped make the show what it is today. In many ways the albums of the last decade taught us about music, but more importantly they taught us a little something about life. So we did what we always do and made them fight it out to see which was the most deserving of our love. It's how we were raised. It's how we will die.  All of that, and inevitably more, on an all-new PopFilter Podcast! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Shivers

The Taste Buds discuss David Cronenberg's break-out Canadian hit, Shivers! The Taste Buds are continuing their trek through 1975, and there was just too many movies to fit everything into the bracket. So throughout the 1975 season, some of the Taste Buds are doing bonus shows of movies that didn't quite make the elite 8, but still deserve to be talked about. This week, the Friends turn their sights to David Cronenberg's horny zombie movie Shivers! Join an all-star line-up, including Movies I'd Like to Fix's Kate Dellis, A Vague Idea's Nate Ragolia, Movie of the Year regulars Mike and Ryan, and future podcast superstar Van Baumann! What a line-up! Together, this dream team tries to review and analyze this horror semi-classic. Taking place in a state-of-the-art (for 1975) apartment building, Shivers tells the story of a group of people who are attacked by a lab experiment gone wrong. Created to help grow new organs in people, instead, this science mistake is invading people's bodies, giving them the shivers, and make them want to make sexy time! Unfortunately, the creature is also passed around through sex, so everyone in the building is in danger! Lead by host Kate, the Taste Buds try and find all of the ways that Shivers showed-off and predicted the work of a master such as Cronenberg. His obsession with bodies is here, as well as his obsession with the obsession of the normal life that people somehow want. They also focus on what all of this sex stuff is supposed to mean, and what David is trying to say by placing all of the action in this crazy futuristic apartment building! Make sure to subscribe to the Movies I'd Like to Fix podcast, and follow @movies_fix and @kate_dellis! Make sure to subscribe to the A Vague Idea podcast, and follow @nateragolia and @avagueidea Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Jaws

Jaws is the biggest movie of 1975, but does it have what it takes to win Movie of the Year! Jaws is called the first blockbuster because of its mass appeal and wide release, not to mention the eponymous chompers of the star of the picture, Jaws himself.  But has Jawrs just been swimming by on its reputation, or is it worthy of its larger-than-life place in the pop culture biosphere? In this episode we discuss which genre this movie truly belongs to. It's scary, but it's not quite horror. It's funny, but it's certainly not a comedy. It's got soul, but it's certainly not a solider. Also, we get into what Jawrs is saying about 1975 masculinity. Three dudes, all alike in dignity, head off on a boat to go kill a jaws, which they assume is a man because it is violent and sucks. But can they kill the jawrs of suicidal manhood, eager to feed upon even its companions?  Plus, we'll hand out some awards! All of that, and conceivably more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Dog Day Afternoon

Dog Day Afternoon is one of the biggest movies of 1975, discussed here for the first time on Movie of the Year! On a very special episode of Movie of the Year: 1975, the Taste Buds bring their own brand of off-kilter hi-jinx to the 1975 cinematic classic, Dog Day Afternoon.  In this capital-F Film, a bank robbery goes wrong and turns into a hostage situation, which also goes pretty bad if I'm honest. We get into the audience's evolving understanding of the movie's main character and the tonal shifts that run through the movie. Also, we discuss how the film approaches the sexuality and gender of its characters. Because it is our solemn duty, we construct a Mount Rushmore of 1975 music. Because it is your demand, we are adding to our hallowed Pop Filter Presents The Pop Filter Hall of Fame. Plus they'll hand out some awards! All of that, and more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Day of the Locust

The Day of the Locust is the first bonus episode of the 1975 Movie of the Year season! On a very special episode of Movie of the Year: 1975, Ryan and Greg are kicking off the bonus season. 1975 had way too many interesting movies for just an 8 movie bracket, so the Taste Budz are busting out and doing a whole grip of bonus shows, starting with John Schlesinger's The Day of the Locust! In this darkly comedic drama about 1940's Hollywood, a group of misfits and losers all try to help and hurt each other, which is similar to Ryan and Greg's dynamic. On this podcast, they'll try and see if they can classify this movie with a genre or type, discuss what Lynch learned from the movie, and the film's analysis on art versus artifice. Plus they'll hand out some awards! All of that, and more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.comnathan

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975Barry Lyndon

The Taste Buds take on the first movie that anyone thinks of when they think of 1975, Barry Lyndon! OK, maybe Barry Lyndon is not the first movie most people think of when they think of 1975, but maybe it should be. It's a Kubrick, it's almost all lighted with natural light and candles, it's based on a book by a guy with the name William Makepeace Thackery. Plus, it looks like someone made a flipbook out of the greatest paintings you'll ever see. Seriously, the cinematography in this movie is the best you may ever see. It sets its sights high, and exceeds them in parts. Candles and Dandies It's important to remember that the white powder caked-on every face you see from this time period was full of arsenic and lead. So basically these people were constantly poisoned and driven crazy by the attempt to look even whiter than Europeans already do. Dang, we white people are a crazy bunch. I hope we never get up to any nonsense! I couldn't handle that. How we doin, 1975? You have to wonder how the people of 1975 were doing to reach back and pluck a story like this from the literary canon. It's about being phony, not knowing what to believe, and failing your way to the grave. So how we doin so far, 1975? Pretty bad! Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 1975A New Season Begins!

The Taste Buds are turning to 1975, and will now pick the 8 candidates for Movie of the Year! Ready to hear three white guys use the phrase "they don't make 'em like this anymore"? Wait, sorry, don't stop reading yet. In many ways 1975 seems like an eternity ago, but it was actually a lot shorter than that. 1975 gave us the birth of the blockbuster with Jawrs, a movie about a shark that really has it where it counts: the jawrs. And it gave us the movie version of Ken Kesey's most famous mescaline trip: One Flew Over This Cukoos Nerst. But what will this season of Movie of this Yearn give to you, the listener/reader? I don't know I am just the guy that writes the website copy. Well, I'm Greg, but I think The Guy That Writes the Copy is a persona separate from Prime Greg? Who knows? You have to get comfortable with the not knowing, which incidentally is something the people of 75 really struggled with. The lack of clarity about what to believe, who to follow, and who to blame seems to have really been causing a lot of tension. Watch the movies, you'll see, America was crazy at the time, and the way it convinced itself it got sane again--the 80s--made it even worse. What's tender in 1975? I'll let you know who is the tender king of this season, but 75 wasn't an especially tender time. Also, I'm a busy guy; I have a whole life besides this (unless I am just a persona as discussed above). Make sure to also: Check out the 1975 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2020A Winner Declared

The Taste Buds discuss 2020's best movies and chose your 2020 Movie of the Year! 2020 was longer than any year had a right to be. As the ship of the world sank into the icy waters of the pandemic, Hollywood played on, delighting us and horrifying us in turn. But movies were not just meant to edify and entertain. No, they were made to jockey and compete, to be pitted against one another in gladiatorial combat until only one movie remained to even be considered. And by the time you're done listening to this episode, you will know 2020's Movie of the Year. Answering 2020's last question This question is too important to be considered by only those who take this seriously, so we brought in a couple of friends, who were eager to show us that they did not respect our show or our opinions: Kate and Tomp, from over there on the show Movies I'd Like to Fix! Will a tender king reign supreme? Cookie is back and ready to bake the cake of our souls and serve it to your ears. We are lucky to have him, and he reminds us we are lucky to have each other. Make sure to also: Check out the 2020 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2020The Penultimate Episode

The Taste Buds discuss 2020's best movies and begin the process of picking the Movie of the Year! The TasteBudz love movies and we love brackets and we love guests who bring their weird energy, so we decided to combine all of those things into one final, two-part episode. We are saying goodbye to 2020, perhaps too early for some. But before we turn out the lights on a year that was lights-out, let us first decide: What is 2020's Movie of the Year? Answering 2020's last question This question is too important to be considered by only those who take this seriously, so we brought in a couple of friends, who were eager to show us that they did not respect our show or our opinions: Kate and Tomp, from over there on the show Movies I'd Like to Fix! Return of a Tender King Cookie is back and ready to bake the cake of our souls and serve it to your ears. We are lucky to have him, and he reminds us we are lucky to have each other. Make sure to also: Check out the 2020 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2020Never Rarely Sometimes Maybe

On an all-new Movie of the Year: 2020, the Taste Buds discuss 2020's Never Rarely Sometimes Always. Ryan continues his journey through the year that is 2020 with the underseen, and somehow still underrated, drama Never Rarely Sometimes Always. Tompkins (twitter: @officialtomp) is here to see if he can win his first Movie of the Year game, and his challenger is Simone Norman (IG: @localhunny)! The two fight over the movie's takes on friendship, abortion, and an evil world full of dudes. They also dedicate a Rushmore to the best female friends in movie history! All of that, and so much more, on an all-new Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 2019 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (TO HEAR EXTRA SEGMENTS!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2020Soul

The Taste Buds discuss 2020's best animated feature-length film, Soul! The TasteBudz love Pixar, music, Jamie Foxx, and Tina Fey, but these are never combined all in one movie. But what if I told you shut up they are and it's in this movie, Soul? Soul looks great on paper and wonderful on screen, but does it have what it takes to take down 2020's Movie of the Year? When a Pixar movie comes out we expect to be blown away, but does this movie manage to get us there? Or is this a super okay movie? I've got Soul, but I'm not a shoe store OK, now I get it. That means this movie is really well named. Think about it: he's fighting for his soul and then also soul usually applies to music as well. Plus, it's a short name. People like things to be short, which may be the problem with jazz: too long. People don't have all day. Most folks don't even finish longer tweets.  Cookie is not in this one Cookie has yet to make another appearance since First Cow. Maybe I'm the silly one for thinking that a great character in one movie would appear in other movies. Maybe I'm the dumb one. Maybe. Make sure to also: Check out the 2020 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2020State of the Franchise

The Taste Buds discuss 2020's franchises! The TasteBudz are talking about the most important thing in all of our lives: movie franchises. We are talking Trolls, Wonders Women, Pixar movies, Covid). Kate joins us to drop some of that Movies I'd Like To Fix energy. But will she be able to fix movies that belong to franchises? Probably, why is it always the questions with you? We are of course going to get into the DCEU. We are for sure gonna tackle WandaVision. And we're definitely gonna hurt each other's feelings! Patreon has got that extra content And let us assuage your fears right off the bat, yes, we are discussing Space Jam. Greg unveils a new saying of his own invention, which we assume will catch on in no time, and Kate makes a startling confession. OK, now I am being told this is only available to our pay pals via our Patreon. Jerk-Store move on our part and I dig it! CookieTracker 2020 Cookie has yet to make another appearance since First Cow, but we keep hoping. I have to admit that I thought maybe Cookie's appearances were linked to Kate's but.... Make sure to also: Check out the 2020 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2020Nomadland

The Taste Buds discuss 2020's Best Picture winner, Nomadland! The TasteBudz are about as hyped as we have ever been because we are talking about 2020 Best Picture, Nomadland. Did we know it was the best picture at the time? No. Do we care that it has since won Best Picture? Meh. Feels like a really good pick though, and by the time you are done listening to this podcast, you'll agree. We spend a lot of time talking about how great Chloe Zhou is and about how bad Amazon is, which is funny because I've only seen this one movie of hers and yet I buy like everything I use off Amazon. But I FEEL the right way is the thing. She sure does move around a lot OK, now I get it. That means this movie is really well named. Like a van named Vanguard. You gotta ask yourself how she thought of that name for her van, Vanguard. Speaking of Vanguard: Seriously think about putting your money into a Vanguard S&P 500 account. It's a really solid long-term investment that I made a few years ago and need others to keep also making for about the next 30 years, at which point I can just cash out and die. Cookie is not in this one Cookie has yet to make another appearance since First Cow, but we keep hoping. If Cookie were in ONE other movie this year, you have to imagine this would have been it, but nah. Make sure to also: Check out the 2020 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (to get the show early and hear bonus segments!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com

https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter (Support the show) (https://www.patreon.com/yourpopfilter)

View Details

Movie of the Year: 2020I'm Thinking of Ending Things

The Taste Buds continue working on 2020 with I'm Thinking of Ending Things! On a very special episode of Movie of the Year, Mike and Ryan call in their good friend Christina Barsi, owner of Avant Haus Media, to come to the studio and help them break down I'm Thinking of Ending Things! Christina is a professional in all things podcasting, so let's hope Mike and Ryan bring their game! The three first try to make sense of the movie and then discuss what the movie is trying to say about relationships, suicide, our relation to family, our relation to pop culture, and our relationship to Dairy Queen. As if that wasn't enough, they also create a Mount Rushmore dedicated to Charlie Kaufman characters, and play some Kaufman trivia! All of that, and so much more, on an all-new Movie of the Year: 2020! And stay tuned next week, when Greg is back, Mike is the new host, and the Taste Buds begin the search for 2001's Movie of the Year! Make sure to also: Check out the 2019 bracket Visit our website Use our Amazon page! Join our Patreon team! (TO HEAR EXTRA SEGMENTS!) Like us! Follow us! Write to Us! — contact@yourpopfilter.com