Closing Arguments: Recent Episodes
John Razumich
Welcome to Closing Arguments, a show dedicated to exploring court cases and offering insights into the ever-changing landscape of criminal law.
Featuring John Razumich, Attorney at Razumich & Associates, P.C., each episode will highlight a new law-related topic to help provide education or guidance when navigating the complex world of criminal law. With over a decade of experience in criminal law throughout the state of Indiana, John is no stranger to a courtroom and is ready to fight for all his clients.
So sit back, relax, and enjoy thought-provoking conversations!
Expert witnesses play a pivotal role in shaping the outcome of trials, often serving as the linchpin between complex evidence and the jury's understanding. But how are these experts chosen? What criteria guide their selection, and how do attorneys ensure they're not just qualified but also compelling in the courtroom?
Drawing from decades of experience, John Razumich, of Razumich & Associates, offers invaluable insights into the art of expert witness selection. From identifying the right expertise to assessing credibility and demeanor, every step in the process is carefully orchestrated to bolster the case's strength.
Chapters:
0:00 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the show
1:47 - What is an expert witness?
3:42 - The differences between the Federal and State standard for an expert witness
7:29 - Who can be an expert witness within a given case?
10:52 - The idea of "reasonable scientific principles" and a scientific witness
20:42 - How an expert witness is 'obtained' by the prosecution or defense
30:17 - The difference between an expert witness and a skilled witness
33:33 - What can an expert witness actually testify to?
40:30 - How to get in touch with Jack and his team for representation
44:03 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich:
Website
YouTube
In this eye-opening episode of Closing Arguments, join John and Ryan, as they delve into the intricacies of the legal profession, debunking common misconceptions surrounding the role of defense attorneys. Contrary to popular belief, defense attorneys aren't just advocates for the guilty; they serve a critical function in upholding the principles of justice for all.
Through riveting anecdotes and insightful analysis, John Razumich offers listeners an insider's perspective on the value that defense attorneys provide to their clients and the broader legal system. From navigating complex legal procedures to safeguarding individuals' rights, defense attorneys play a pivotal role in ensuring fair and equitable treatment under the law.
Enjoy!
Chapters:
0:00 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day
1:43 - The realities of hiring a defense attorney
9:31 - How plea agreements work and how a defense attorney navigates them for a client
19:28 - The waiting game played by the state
22:39 - Is a defense attorney simply helping bad people get away with it?
29:30 - Bail reform and "letting dangerous people back out on the street"
35:16 - Just because your friend was not guilty, doesn't mean you will be too
40:02 - Why is it so expensive to hire a defense attorney?
47:42 - It's more expensive to not hire an attorney
51:00 - The number one job of your defense attorney
53:00 - How to get in touch with Jack and his team
54:45 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich:
Website
YouTube
As we continue our coverage on the State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen case, we take a deeper look into the Original Actions existing within this case.
Original Actions themselves are quite rare to experience, but given the wild nature of this case it's no surprise we've experienced them.
Join us as Jack and Ryan break down the Original Actions, what they mean, and where this case is ultimately headed!
Chapters:
0:00 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day
2:40 - What is an Original Action and how it operates
4:09 - The limitations within Original Actions and how they are disfavored by the courts
7:21 - The two Original Actions filed within the Richard Allen case
13:47 - Why The Supreme Court denied the first writ
18:50 - The fireworks surrounding the Franks Motion filed in this case
26:42 - The Supreme Court granting the second Original Action, in part
33:51 - The case has reached a standstill for now
41:40 - Our plan for covering this case in the future as new developments arise
43:13 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich:
Website
YouTube
In this riveting episode of "Closing Arguments," we continue our dive deep into the intricacies of the State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen case, a legal saga that has captivated the nation.
Join us as we unravel the layers of this complex case, examining the Allen's confession, shady prison guards, and even the theft of crime scene photos!
This case continues to get more twisted each day, leaving our hosts and the audience wondering what type of fireworks will happen next?
Enjoy!
Chapters:
0:00 - Introduction and overview on the episode
1:26 - Recapping the high-level details of the Richard Allen case
6:01 - Richard Allen's custody arrangements
10:44 - Odinism in the prison system
14:36 - How Allen's attorneys handled potential Odinists in the prison system
22:31 - Richard Allen's confession and its value to the prosecution
29:48 - The fallout of this case and what to be on the lookout for
37:46 - The issue of a gag order
46:22 - A tragic suicide enters the picture
59:30 - The battle between judge and attorneys
1:01:35 - The court has the authority to remove an attorney from a given case
1:03:53 - What to expect in our next episode covering this case
1:04:28 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich:
Website
YouTube
If you thought this case was interesting, you haven't heard anything yet!
Welcome back to our multi-part episodic series, where we explore The State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen. This murder case has gained international attention and it continues to get crazier as time goes on.
In Part 2, we explore the pieces of evidence that begin creating cracks in the State's theory on how Richard Allen followed through with murder.
Enjoy!
Timecodes:
0:06 - Introduction and overview on the case
1:06 - Researching the case for the podcast has been exhausting
3:35 - What is a Franks Motion?
6:50 - The Defense attorneys argued that the Sheriff lied to the judge in application for warrant
7:50 - The State's public theory of the case
12:26 - The search warrant application containing false information
15:25 - Time to buckle up your seatbelt!
21:20 - The nature of the crime scene wasn't initially revealed
30:43 - There was no DNA left at the crime scene
34:57 - How Odinism comes into play with this case
39:18 - The red flags that begin popping up in the State's theory
49:14 - Who ultimately will be Richard Allen's attorney at the end of the day?
53:36 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich:
Website
YouTube
In this gripping episode of Closing Arguments, we delve deep into a high-profile legal case that shook the heartland of America. Join us as we unravel the intricacies of the "State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen," a trial that captivated the nation and continues to unfold today.
Richard Allen, an enigmatic figure at the center of the storm, found himself entangled in a web of allegations that would change his life forever. As the trial unfolds, we explore the evidence, the legal strategies, and the key players involved in this complex and emotionally charged case.
Timecodes:
0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the show
1:04 - Background on State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen
4:05 - The landscape and population of Delphi, Indiana
6:30 - The chilling video that was taken from the murder
10:40 - There are many portions of this case that aren't available to the public
16:50 - Richard Allen being charged with two counts of murder
21:40 - The case generating international attention and how that impacted the investigation
28:01 - The judge recusing themself from this massive case
36:00 - Changing the venue of the trial
41:02 - The defense goes nuclear!
49:26 - New details from this case are becoming available
51:18 - Was Richard Allen involved in this murder?
51:57 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich:
Website
YouTube
On the latest episode of Closing Arguments, we delve deep into the heart of the justice system and explore "The Anatomy of a Trial." In this thought-provoking episode, we take our listeners on an enlightening journey through the intricate process of a courtroom trial.
Hosted by John Razumich, this episode sheds light on every phase of a trial, from its inception to its conclusion. We demystify the proceedings and break down the roles of key players, including judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, witnesses, and jurors, to reveal how they shape the outcome of a case.
Timecodes:
0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day
1:53 - What happens before a trial ever begins
7:30 - How jury selection is conducted and why it's such an important part of a trial
16:30 - Diversifying a jury to give multiple perspectives on a given case
21:26 - Preliminary instructions at the pre-trial matters hearing
29:50 - How evidence and exhibits come into play during a trial
35:07 - The various stages at the conclusion of a trial
43:00 - Jury deliberations and the reading of the verdict
50:01 - How you can get in touch with John and his team for representation
51:15 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich:
Website
YouTube
Welcome back to Closing Arguments!
We're back for an all-new season of the show and we're kicking things off with a deep dive into the juvenile law system in Indiana. Join us as we explore the challenges, triumphs, and ongoing debates surrounding the juvenile justice system, with a particular focus on the Hoosier State.
To kick off the episode, we lay the foundation by examining the historical development of Juvenile Law in Indiana. We explore the origins of the system and the intentions behind its establishment. As we uncover the key milestones and influential court cases that shaped Indiana's approach, we also assess the evolution of juvenile justice practices over time.
Timecodes:
0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day
1:40 - What is Juvenile Law?
3:06 - The brith of a separate law system between an adult and a juvenile
5:20 - Where the idea of treating adults and kids differently came from
7:58 - The defense of infancy and where it resides within juvenile law
11:20 - How juvenile law differs from adult law in the State of Indiana
15:52 - Juvenile proceedings have differing rights from adult proceedings
20:02 - Can a juvenile be charged as an adult in the State of Indiana
25:50 - Being arrested as an adult for a crime that happened when you were a juvenile
29:16 - The long-term ramifications of a juvenile convicted of a crime
34:50 - How you can get in touch with John and his team
36:15 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich:
Website
YouTube
In the season finale of Closing Arguments, we’re diving into one of the most controversial topics within a courtroom: The Insanity Defense. You’ve seen this defense play out within TV and movies, but how does it really work in the real world? We'll explore every avenue of this affirmative defense, including John's very own experiences with defending a client using the insanity defense! Sit back, relax, and enjoy an exciting season finale! Timecodes: 0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the show 4:09 - When the insanity defense was first recorded within criminal law 7:50 - These cases were primarily surrounding life or death instances 12:30 - Where the rules around an insanity defense case stemmed from 16:00 - Temporary insanity and how this plays out in a courtroom 22:58 - The shifting of burden within an insanity defense 27:42 - The current state of insanity pleas within American law today 35:14 - When someone should plead insanity within a case 38:55 - Who determines insanity? 45:45 - The ripple effect of an acquittal when using an insanity defense 48:20 - When can someone be declared sane later in life 53:50 - How you can get in touch with Jack's team 55:40 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich: https://www.lawyersreadytofight.com/ (Website) https://www.facebook.com/lawyersreadytofight (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5ChwCL9P_XlqI2uyYv1ig (YouTube) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-razumich-b35bb282/ (LinkedIn)
For most people, they're aware of the role a jury plays within a criminal court case. This is likely due to their favorite crime or courtroom drama! However, there's actually a lot of background information that's important for courts to consider when going through jury selection, as well as the power a jury holds within a given case. On the latest installment of Closing Arguments, we're exploring the various items you should know about juries throughout Indiana, as well as the country as a whole. Timecodes: 0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day 1:27 - Jack's team has been busy in courtrooms lately 2:15 - Where juries ultimately come from 5:00 - Early English juries and what those looked like 9:10 - The Magna Carta and its role on the modern jury system 13:13 - A Constitutional Right to a jury 17:30 - The various types of juries that exist today 25:00 - What is a Coroner's Jury? 28:12 - Civil vs. Criminal juries in Indiana 35:00 - How are juries selected in Indiana? 38:20 - Compensation for jurors 41:24 - The power of a jury 49:20 - What potential jurors need to know! 55:00 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich: https://www.lawyersreadytofight.com/ (Website) https://www.facebook.com/lawyersreadytofight (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5ChwCL9P_XlqI2uyYv1ig (YouTube) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-razumich-b35bb282/ (LinkedIn)
Affirmative defenses and everything in between! That's what we're tackling on the latest installment of Closing Arguments. Join us for another enlightening conversation, where John Razumich shares his personal experiences with the various affirmative defenses in Indiana and the fundamental differences between them. We've got another great episode on tap for you. Enjoy! Timecodes: 0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day 1:35 - What is an affirmative defense? 5:50 - There are ten total affirmative defenses in Indiana 8:17 - The affirmative defense of Legal Authority 11:25 - Self-defense and how this plays out in court 15:00 - The affirmative defense of involuntary intoxication 20:30 - Insanity defenses 26:45 - Mistake of fact 37:21 - Abandonment and how this plays out 40:40 - Battered spouse syndrome 45:25 - The affirmative defense of necessity 50:30 - How you can get in touch with Razumich & Associates 52:40 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich: https://www.lawyersreadytofight.com/ (Website) https://www.facebook.com/lawyersreadytofight (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5ChwCL9P_XlqI2uyYv1ig (YouTube) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-razumich-b35bb282/ (LinkedIn)
There are too many legal myths out there, confusing us when it comes to criminal law and its proceedings! On the latest installment of Closing Arguments, we're exploring a variety of different legal myths and setting the record straight once and for all! Listen as John reviews our audience's feedback on the biggest police-related myths, as well as courtroom myths that many believe to be true. This episode is bound to leave you with some clarification on legalities you may have wrongfully thought to be true! Timecodes: 0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day 1:45 - Receiving legal myths from our audience to review on today's show 2:38 - Do the police have to read me my rights before speaking to me? 5:04 - Do police have to tell me if they are working undercover? 6:50 - Do police have to be honest with me? 10:12 - Do I have to stop and talk to the police? 14:00 - Do I have to consent to a police search? 18:35 - Do I have to get out of the car when I'm told to? 22:31 - Do I have the right to one free phone call when incarcerated? 26:14 - Are you entitled to three plea offers? 28:54 - Are you entitled to three continuances? 32:19 - Do warrants eventually go away? 36:18 - Can alleged victims drop charges? 40:11 - Is it going to cost the state a lot of money to take my case to trial? 43:10 - Are public defenders working for the state and not me? 46:56 - Does hiring an attorney make you look guilty? 52:20 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich: https://www.lawyersreadytofight.com/ (Website) https://www.facebook.com/lawyersreadytofight (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5ChwCL9P_XlqI2uyYv1ig (YouTube) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-razumich-b35bb282/ (LinkedIn)
Ever since its establishment, the Supreme Court has left a monumental footprint on our lives, hearing some of the biggest legal disputes that have shaped the way we operate as a country and a society. In the latest installment of Closing Arguments, we're going back in time and reviewing a brief history of the Supreme Court. From its development to becoming arguably the most powerful branch of our government today, we'll explore the various cases, as well as justices, that brought the court to what its become today. We've got another informative episode for you today! So sit back, relax, and enjoy this overview on the history of our country's highest legal body. Timecodes: 0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day 1:48 - What does the Supreme Court do? 4:54 - The power of the Supreme Court developed over time 8:21 - John Jay and the footprint he left on the Supreme Court 13:35 - What qualifications did a Supreme Court justice need to have? 19:02 - The Supreme Court's role during the Civil War 30:25 - Amendments and the Supreme Court's ruling with segregation 38:49 - The Lochner era 44:09 - Out of the Lochner Era and into World War II 47:30 - The incorporation of the Bill of Rights 50:55 - The Civil Rights Era and the Supreme Court's role in this 55:27 - Chief Justice Earl Warren's footprint he left on our country 1:07:22 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich: https://www.lawyersreadytofight.com/ (Website) https://www.facebook.com/lawyersreadytofight (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5ChwCL9P_XlqI2uyYv1ig (YouTube) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-razumich-b35bb282/ (LinkedIn)
In the latest installment of Closing Arguments, we bring you one of the most peculiar case studies that John Razumich has ever been involved in! With stab wounds, a lying prostitute and a wild courtroom trial, this episode is one you aren't going to miss. Regarded as one of the more interesting cases throughout the Indianapolis area, John walks us through the intricate details and explains his vantage point on the case. Sit back, relax, and enjoy this can't-miss episode! Timecodes: 0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day 1:35 - Introducing The Curious Case of the Hot Dog Man! 5:02 - The crime that plays out in this case 9:50 - The investigation begins 19:18 - Building the defense around the Hot Dog Man 25:50 - Kadrovach begins feeding Jack and his team thoughts on the defense tactics 33:50 - The defense's case as they moved towards trial 41:49 - Kadrovach paying a prostitute to give false alibi 49:33 - The optics within the trial were not helping Kadrovach 54:09 - The aftermath of the trial 1:02:39 - Where is the Hot Dog Man today? 1:05:20 - How to get in touch with John for representation 1:06:46 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich: https://www.lawyersreadytofight.com/ (Website) https://www.facebook.com/lawyersreadytofight (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5ChwCL9P_XlqI2uyYv1ig (YouTube) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-razumich-b35bb282/ (LinkedIn)
In the latest installment of Closing Arguments, we revisit the United States vs. Shipp case to conclude the dramatic events that unfolded during the Supreme Court's involvement. After a quick recap of events that led to Ed Johnson being incarcerated for a crime he swore he didn't commit, Jack highlights how the Supreme Court ultimately became involved. And we'll also share how, despite their 'stay of execution' order, Ed Johnson still met his demise. Listen as we bring this fascinating case study comes to a close! Timecodes: 0:06 - Introduction and equipment announcements 3:32 - Recapping the events that led to Ed Johnson being incarcerated 10:16 - Ed Johnson's legal team taking matters into their own hands 25:05 - A stay of execution was granted for Ed Johnson 33:20 - Justice Harlan enters scene, which was a win for Ed Johnson and his legal team 36:01 - The lynching of Ed Johnson at the hand of a mob 44:26 - Given the lynching, the Supreme Court charges many with contempt of the court 54:00 - Sheriff Shipp returns to Chattanooga and receives a hero's welcome 57:30 - Final thoughts and takeaways from this forgotten legal landmark 1:03:11 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich: https://www.lawyersreadytofight.com/ (Website) https://www.facebook.com/lawyersreadytofight (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5ChwCL9P_XlqI2uyYv1ig (YouTube) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-razumich-b35bb282/ (LinkedIn)
In the latest installment of Closing Arguments, we're exploring a forgotten legal landmark, which outlines the only original jurisdiction criminal case that was argued before The Supreme Court. Listen, as John takes us through the historic case of United States vs. Shipp and showcases an original example of the press' influence on a criminal trial. This case is packed with interesting variables and courtroom fireworks, so you don't want to miss this one! Sit back, relax, and enjoy part one of our first two-part case study! Timecodes: 0:08 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day 2:38 - John joins the show and launches into the background information on United States vs. Shipp 8:45 - The assault of Nevada Taylor 18:30 - Where Sheriff Shipp comes into play in this case 24:23 - The press' impact on this court case 33:19 - The trial of Ed Johnson and the fireworks involved in the courtroom 42:51 - Ed Johnson is convicted and sentenced to death 46:31 - This case ends up in the Supreme Court 51:00 - What is still to come in Part Two of this case study 53:30 - Closing remarks Connect with John Razumich: https://www.lawyersreadytofight.com/ (Website) https://www.facebook.com/lawyersreadytofight (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5ChwCL9P_XlqI2uyYv1ig (YouTube) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-razumich-b35bb282/ (LinkedIn)
In the latest installment of Closing Arguments, John and Ryan explore the law of self defense, which continues to be one of the most controversial topics among criminal law to date. Listen as John shares a complete breakdown on the law of self defense and how it varies across different states. Additionally, John explores how self defense is contested in the courtroom and how the media's coverage of this law has evolved over the years through some key case studies. With self defense being one of the most popular criminal law topics these days, this is an episode packed with beneficial information! Enjoy! Timecodes: 0:06 - Overview on the topic of the day 2:10 - An update on Razumich & Associates 3:09 - A broad overview on the law of self defense and how it appears in criminal law today 5:28 - What affirmative defenses are generally 7:47 - How someone can make a claim for self defense 15:12 - What self defense looks like within a trial 18:41 - How the burden shifts of proving self defense in trial 22:41 - Testifying on your own behalf during a self defense claim 25:58 - The limitations that exist within self defense claims 30:30 - The jury's involvement during a self defense claim trial 34:02 - John's viewpoint on self defense and whether it always works or not 45:20 - Case studies that are specific to self defense 54:20 - How you can get in touch with John and his team 56:09 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich: https://www.lawyersreadytofight.com/ (Website) https://www.facebook.com/lawyersreadytofight (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5ChwCL9P_XlqI2uyYv1ig (YouTube) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-razumich-b35bb282/ (LinkedIn)
A conviction has been reached in court, but what happens next? In the latest installment of Closing Arguments, John and Ryan explore this question and the various strategies at a defendant's disposal to continue the fight. Within this conversation, they explore three key themes that can take place following convictions: The Appeal Process, Post Conviction Relief, and Sentence Modification. Each of these avenues contains its own complexities, but each can be a viable solution for someone convicted in court if they meet particular standards. Just when you think it's over, it may not be! Timecodes: 0:06 - Welcome to the show and overview on the topic 2:34 - Walkthrough on the appeal process and how someone can start it 7:26 - How a case can get to the Supreme Court level 12:51 - What happens when an appeal is successful 17:10 - Overview on post conviction relief and where it enters the picture 20:27 - How many times can PCR be filed in a given case? 25:25 - What happens when PCR is successful for a defendant 28:48 - Everything that goes into sentence modification 40:10 - Which process that John finds to be the most successful 46:31 - How you can get in touch with Razumich & Associates 48:33 - Closing remarks
In the second installment of Closing Arguments, John and Ryan explore the various facets of the Miranda Warnings, as well as how they have impacted a police officer's interact with civilians overall. Listen as John outlines the monumental court ruling in Miranda vs. Arizona and why the Supreme Court's decision was handed down. Despite their decision receiving some backlash or fallout, their ruling remains intact today and it's something most people are familiar with. Additionally, John outlines how this ruling has altered police interactions altogether. We'll explore the various situations in which the Miranda Warnings are required and how you should interact with a police officer based on various circumstances. Sit back, relax, and enjoy another insightful conversation surrounding concept you thought you knew! Timecodes: 0:08 - Welcome to the show and overview on the topic of the day 2:30 - Overview on the Miranda Warnings 4:33 - The birth of the Miranda Warnings and the monumental court case of Miranda vs. Arizona 8:14 - How this case unfolded at the Supreme Court level 10:40 - The fallout of the Supreme Court's ruling and what it meant for criminal law moving forward 15:00 - Legal developments that came after the Supreme Court's ruling 25:00 - Whatever happened to Ernesto Miranda after the court ruling? 27:49 - The involuntary and voluntary interactions with police 30:00 - Overview on the custodial interrogation process 35:20 - The questions you should ask yourself when interacting with the police 44:20 - Don't break the law 49:00 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich: https://www.lawyersreadytofight.com/ (Website) https://www.facebook.com/lawyersreadytofight (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5ChwCL9P_XlqI2uyYv1ig (YouTube) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-razumich-b35bb282/ (LinkedIn)
In the inaugural episode of Closing Arguments, we introduce you to John Razumich, Attorney at Razumich & Associates, P.C., who serves as an expert in criminal law and a public defender across the state of Indiana. After serving the greater Indiana area for over a decade, John brings a wealth of experience to the table. After describing some of his personal and professional life experiences, John highlights the landscape surrounding fast and speedy trails. Not only has the definition of a fast and speedy trial evolved since its establishment, but there have been landmark court cases to help define this process. Additionally, John will explore the idea of forfeitures and the misconceptions surrounding this topic. So sit back, relax, and we thank you for joining us on our inaugural episode! Timecodes: 0:07 - Welcome to the show and introducing John Razumich 2:13 - Background information on John and his law background in Indiana 5:04 - The reputation that Razumich & Associates receives across Indiana 6:39 - The hot topic of a fast and speedy trial 12:26 - Where the OJ Simpson case fell in the realm of fast and speedy trials 14:20 - The four-part balancing test applied to fast and speedy trials 24:00 - The Speedy Trial Act of 1974 and how it's applied to cases today 29:00 - How fast and speedy trials work throughout the state of Indiana 34:50 - An independent constitutional analysis and the Barker Test 42:15 - The case of Tyson Timbs and its impact on forfeitures 55:40 - But wait! There's more! 1:02:00 - Closing remarks
Connect with John Razumich: https://www.lawyersreadytofight.com/ (Website) https://www.facebook.com/lawyersreadytofight (Facebook) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL5ChwCL9P_XlqI2uyYv1ig (YouTube) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-razumich-b35bb282/ (LinkedIn)