Politics and Parenting Podcast: Recent Episodes
Jeff Mayhugh & John Beatty
A podcast about how Parents shape children's lives and how Government shapes Society.
politicsandparenting.substack.com
It’s been a while since I put out a Politics and Parenting podcast. With so much going on with work and family, I have decided to focus my energy on No Cap Fund and Hardhits over Politics and Parenting.
There isn’t much in this special episode hosted by my wife, Vanessa, about the traditional politics of Washington; however, the politics of business and marriage are front and center. She shares her story of leaving her career at a midsize corporation to join me and run Hardhits, a small community branding company that prints custom apparel.
She asks me the pressing questions like Why did you start Hardhits? And what is it like working with your wife?
The episode is longer than normal because there is no one in the world I enjoy talking with more than my wife, and so we just kept going. It was a ton of fun to shoot. We discuss the importance of communication in both business and personal relationships, the challenges and rewards of running a small business, and the role of youth sports in community building and personal development. We also discuss the value of teamwork and leadership on business success and personal growth.
If you run a small business, have a family, work with your spouse, or want to run a small business, you don’t want to miss this episode!
If you need custom apparel, contact Vanessa at info@hardhits.net or visit our website www.hardhits.net.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Thanks for reading Politics and Parenting! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
Today, in The Hill, I challenge the Trump administration to think bigger. Every significant President that exerts their power, follows it up by bringing Congress to heel in a bipartisan way. If Trump wants to be one of the greats, he will find a way to reach across the aisle and work with Democrats on reform.
He needs to walk into members of the Blue Dog coalition’s offices in the Longworth building and start a serious conversation about reform. There is a silent majority in America ready for this and mandates require the people’s backing.
In this Pod, I am joined by my good friend Stephen Kent from Geeky Stoics. We discuss a recent pod from Ezra Klein and his description of Congress as a Non-Player member. (In gaming, a Non-Player Member is a participant who isn't actively controlling a character.) We also talk about Elon and DOGE, and why bipartisanship matters.
As a personal note, I just want to share what a joy it was to record with Stephen. He is a great guy. I love his profession, optimism, and seriousness. It was great to get together in person. I had a lot of fun. Thanks, Stephen! Show him some love and subscribe to Geeky Stoics, for all things stoicism, philosophy, and pop culture.
If you like this pod and want more, show me some encouragement and become a paid subscriber.
Peace & Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
I got a little behind on work and am releasing this one a little late. But better late than never, right?
In the episode, Walter and I discussed my November 26th article and substack about Nikki Haley and Ronald Reagan. Then, we debated whether our founders were Revolutionaries or Reformers.
In the pod, I mentioned Tim Carny's article from January 2024 about Trump's business relationship with China. I also found this article relevant to Walter and my discussion about Boeing.
Enjoy!
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
Happy Day after Thanksgiving! I recorded this pod last Sunday but didn't get a chance to edit it until yesterday. So when I talk about my latest article, it’s the one that came out on Tuesday the 26th.
In the pod, I share some stories about my new job at Home Depot, a road trip with my son Oliver, and a coffee date with my twins.
In the beginning, I shared how the responsibilities of customer service at Home Depot are similar to those of our congressional representatives. Then, I talked about how Oliver and I bonded on a trip to mourn a good friend's father. After I shared how reading Matthew 5:21-26 with my girls makes parenting just a little easier.
Sometimes, it feels like I can’t do anything right; sometimes, it feels like I am failing everyone around me. It’s times like that when I lean on Jesus the most.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
Today on Politics and Parenting, I play you know what grinds my gears, parenting edition. I share stories from our house of children: Julia and the fan, Sadie being tired, and Oliver’s tendency to be grumpy.
In the second half of the show, I play, you know what grinds my gears politics edition. I talk about my latest article in The Hill, a conversation on X, and why we should repair representation over saving democracy.
During the second part of the show, I mentioned the formation of a select committee on election reforms, but I forgot to mention the members' names. It is a bipartisan committee announced by Congressman Jared Golden (ME-02) and Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA-03) to tackle election reform. Part of the reforms they recommend center on representation and specifically expanding the House of Representatives.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
Walter Clapp from No Cap Fund is back by popular demand.
At the beginning of the show, I air my grievances about Tom Nichols from the Atlantic blocking me on X.
Then, we discuss whether there is a secret Harris vote and if women will decide the election.
Check out these USA Today and Newsweek articles.
If either candidate loses, what could they have done differently to win?
Check out these articles from National Review (1, 2, & 3), Wired, Huffington Post, and CBS News.
Finally, we will finish the show by talking about Representation. How does illegal immigration affect our representation and electoral system?
Enjoy!
Peace & Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
In this episode, my friend from the No Cap Fund, Walter Clapp, joins me. Walter guest hosts the show as we discuss the upcoming presidential election.
What if Texas goes Blue?
Walter and I discuss my latest article in The Hill about the possibility that Ruby Red Texas could turn blue in 2024.
Could JD Vance become the most powerful Vice President in American History?
Walter and I discuss the possibility of Texas going purple and JD Vance becoming the tie-breaking vote in the Senate and the key to the 25th Amendment.
What was that about Trump and Mike Johnson having a secret plan?
Walter and I discuss whether the secret plan has anything to do with the 1876 election and what it might mean for America.
Let’s Talk about Representation!
Walter and I do what we do best: we talk about Representation in America. While Alexis de Tocqueville made Democracy in America famous, it’s Representation where American Democracy is held. Walter and I discuss the importance of Representation and how and why the House of Representatives was capped at 435.
Visit Why435.org to donate to the No Cap Fund and help us uncap the House of Representatives. Don’t forget to subscribe to Politics and Parenting so you don’t miss out on new and exciting conversations like this one.
Thank you for listening.
Peace & Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
On today’s pod, I speak with Yuval Levin. He is the director of Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and he has written three books that have been very influential to me: The Fractured Republic, A Time to Build, and American Covenant.
Levin and I discuss our current political dysfunction and how a renewal of the Constitution can help. We also discuss Congress's ineffectiveness and what reforms can be made to strengthen the institution.
Levin was a delight to have on the show. He is one of the country's most important thought leaders. America would be doing much better if we listened to his (and other reformers’) ideas about representation, incentives, and balance of power. Few in the country understand what makes America Great, like Yuval Levin. In an age of negativity and fear, Levin offers an optimistic vision of America, where citizens are empowered to govern themselves. Enjoy the Show!
Peace & Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
In this episode, I am joined by Michael Johnson, Co-Author of Fixing Congress: Restoring Power to the People. Mike and I discuss the importance of Congress, a little history of the House of Representatives and Speaker, and reforms we can make to restore Congressional power back to the people.
Fixing Congress is full of insightful ideas and important and interesting information. Whether you are a nerd like me or just someone looking to become more informed about our political divide, Fixing Congress is a great read. You can purchase your copy by clicking here.
Don’t forget to subscribe to keep up-to-date with great information about Congressional Reform.
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
What does American Covenant and Everybody Loves Raymond have in common? Surprisingly, a lot. I wrote an article about it, and look, I recorded a pod, too! In the pod, I compare the dysfunction of Ray and Deborah’s relationship to that of the majority and minority ruling parties, Republicans and Democrats.
The article connected with this pod is the second part in a series of excerpts from American Covenant Chapter One: What is the Constitution? Levin explains the Constitution as five frameworks: Legal, Policymaking, Institutional, Political, and Unity. The second excerpt is about the policy framework.
Did you miss the first one? No worries, you can find it here. If you download the Substack app, it will read it to you, so it’s like a 2-minute podcast with some random AI guy’s voice.
Thank you for tuning in!
Peace & Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
Today on the show I am joined by Vance Ginn, Ph.D. A leading economist and advocate for free-market principles and fiscal conservatism. He is the former associate director for economic policy at the White House’s Office of Management and Budget and chief economist at the Texas Public Policy Foundation. He is the founder and president of Ginn Economic Consulting and host of the Let People Prosper Show podcast, providing high-impact economic consulting that dives deep into pressing issues with top influencers. He lives in Round Rock, Texas, with his family, championing policies that promote economic freedom and prosperity.
We discuss inflation, debt, minimum wage, currency, and tariffs. This is a great episode for average citizens trying to get a handle on this complex topic. Be sure to follow Vance on X and Substack, and check out his new article out in the Freemen-News Letter.
Peace & Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
In this episode, I am joined by André Béliveau. He is a political and policy analyst based in Washington, D.C., with an MA in Government from Johns Hopkins and a BA in History from Marist College.
André and I dive into the dysfunction plaguing our republic. We discuss Congress and the reforms that could restore life to the decaying legislative branch. We also discuss the parties and their ability to hold themselves accountable.
If you enjoy this episode, remember to subscribe, like, and share!
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
On the pod today I am joined by Kevin R. Kosar, Ph.D., a resident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington, DC think-tank. We discuss some of the basics of our government. Are we a Democracy or a Republic? How should the balance of power work? The bulk of our conversation centers around Congress and how to reform it.
We are sitting in a very unique moment in American history. The division in the country is growing at an unsustainable level. Those in charge keep pointing citizens to the President as the answer, but the President is just one person with limited abilities. Those who want to fulfill the responsibilities of their citizenship should turn away from the focus on the executive branch and instead turn toward Congress. Learn about the institution and find representatives who will focus on congressional reform.
To do that, check out Kevin’s work. He edits UnderstandingCongress.org and hosts the Understanding Congress podcast. He is the co-editor of Congress Overwhelmed: Congressional Capacity and Prospects for Reform (University of Chicago Press), co-author of Unleashing Opportunity: Policy Reforms for an Accountable Administrative State (National Affairs); and the author of Failing Grades: The Federal Politics of Education. He also wrote the preface to Government Project (AEI Press, 2023) by Edward C. Banfield.
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Also, please join Politics and Parenting on Facebook to keep up with local events like story time with The Very Flannel Dino and Presidential Tank Talks. The next Tank Talk will be on John Tyler, the first accidental President at Heritage Brewing, on September 30th from 7 PM to 8:30 PM. Please RSVP to ensure the venue has adequate staffing for the night.
Peace & Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
Happy Fourth of July! I hope everyone is having a great day. All the talk of this great day inspired me to break out the Declaration of Independence and give it a read. After reading it, I had some thoughts I wanted to share. Enjoy!
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
On the pod today, I am joined by Scott Howard, a recent University of Flordia graduate, former National Review intern, and Freemen News-Letter submissions editor. Scott and I discussed the recent Supreme Court decision in Trump vs. the United States, the overturning of the Chevron doctrine, and the mess of a presidential debate last week.
The future may look bleak to some, but the next generation is ready and capable of leading. Our nation is focused too much on the few who understand little and seek to divide and not enough on the many who are well-informed and trying to unite.
On this Independence Day, I want to remind you that James Monroe was a teenager when he signed up to fight in the American Revolution. James Madison was only 25 as a delegate to the Virginia Convention and 29 at the Continental Congress.
So, let’s commit to turning away from divisive leaders like Rachel Maddow and Sean Hannity and focus on the next group of leaders—people like Scott. Let’s support them and create opportunities for them to be successful.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
On this pod, I sit down with Politics and Parenting contributor Andy Tippet. Andy shares his winding story, from teaching, to working in corporate marketing, to fulfilling a passion for studying history. We discuss the heavy workload of the executive position, the gold ring during the Gilded Age, and why history is so important in politics.
Check out Andy’s very relevant article from May on Shadow President Jill Biden, which calls for Joe Biden to step aside.
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
After the debate, it’s obvious to American citizens that Joe Biden is not capable of fulfilling the responsibilities of the most difficult job in the country. He met with his family and decided that he wasn’t going anywhere. Shadow president Jill Biden, at a Vogue photoshoot, said, “We know what’s at stake. Joe is asking the American people to come together to draw a line in the sand against all this vitriol.”
Yet, it’s Jill asking, not Joe. We aren’t fooled. It’s time to retire.
If Joe doesn’t retire, then Democrats in Congress should impeach him, removing him from the ticket and opening up the convention. In today’s pod, I discuss how impeachment is a political tool to remove an executive who violates the public trust in carrying out their duties.
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
In this pod, I share my experience volunteering at Park Valley’s Kid’s gig, my tenth wedding anniversary, and my thoughts on the debate. It’s a longer pod, but I have tried to make it easy to navigate below.
Church Camp- 4:19
My Anniversary- 18:26
The Debate- 35:24
Matt Lewis's article about Biden Stepping down- 36:35 (article linked)
Abortion topic- 41:55
Grading the debate- 43:33
Biden on Abortion- 47:00
The Border- 51:35
Foreign Policy- 56:47
Democracy- 1:03:39
January 6th- 1:15:02
Peaceful Transfer of power- 1:17:45
Who will be Trump’s VP?- 1:20:22
Closing remarks- 1:24:37
Here’s the album artwork I put together with the pictures Vanessa and I took on our anniversary.
In the pod, I mentioned how delicious our meal at Bistro at the Porch was on our anniversary. Here is a picture of the juicy Pork Chop. If you love great food and service but haven’t checked out the Bistro yet, make sure you put it on your to-do list!
Also, if you or anyone you know is interested in building a relationship with Jesus and is looking for the first step, email me at jeff@politicsandparenting.com or visit Park Valley Church in Haymarket, Gainesville, or Warrenton.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. Want to join the family? To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
My good friend over at Written Works, Craig T. Stewart, recommended this song by Tom MacDonald called Me vs. You. Craig is a smart guy, so I followed his advice and shot a video with my thoughts on the song. In the podcast, I discuss what I think about the lyrics and how the song captures the moment of American Division.
The song identifies the source of power, the executive branch and political parties, and how they gain and maintain power by dividing citizens using emotion. I discuss how a spoiled system of politics drives the division and how citizens must understand their responsibilities and hold representatives accountable in our self-governing republic if they want freedom.
Check out my interview with Michael Wolraich for more on the spoils system. And if you are looking for a guide to fulfilling your responsibilities as a citizen in our self-governing republic, check out my Father’s Day post on The Responsibility of Fatherhood and Self Government.
Oh, and my good friend Craig has a new book out calledEmergence: Fall of the West, a follow-up toEmergence. You can purchase them both on Amazon.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. Want to join the family? To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
On today’s pod, I am joined by Michael Wolraich, author of The Bishop and the Butterfly: Murder, Politics, and the End of the Jazz Age. We discuss his new article in Time Magazine How Donald Trump’s Plans Could Bring Back the Spoils System.
A spoils system is the kryptonite of a republican government.
It is a system of party politics where power is concentrated to advance party interests, and patronage is used to reward friends and punish political opponents. A spoils system implemented in a republic for over two generations becomes spoiled. Concentrated power inside a party seeks to undermine the elective process through confusion and division. Spoiled power is entitled, incompetent, and corrupt. It leads nations to war and divides them from within.
Citizens who want to be good stewards of our Republican government should understand spoiled politics so they can elect better representatives who will prioritize the people's interests over the interests of the parties.
Michael has a wealth of knowledge on the topic. You can follow him on X @wolraich and threads @michaelwolraich. His website is michaelwolraich.com. There, you can find links to all his books and writing.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
My journey of history and faith collide every Sunday while sitting in the audience at Park Valley Church. I enjoy studying the great orators of American history: Abraham Lincoln, Williams Jennings Bryant, and JFK. I particularly admire this skill, which is lost in modern American politics. I imagine that’s what God had in mind when he led me to Park Valley because the pastor there, Barry White (no, not that Barry White, lol), is an excellent orator.
Great orators weave their message in and out of different stories. They use their voice like an instrument, loudly projecting to the audience and then quietly pulling them toward the stage. They deliver their message with passion, clarity, and rhythm.
Listening to Barry each week guided me to a relationship with Jesus, and each week since has helped me build a stronger relationship with Jesus. This week, Barry said something that stuck with me: “Be faithful to sharing the truth with others.”
It pierced me. I thought, am I doing that? I prayed about it and decided it was time for me to share the truth with others. In the pod, I share my story of how I was led to Jesus and how God’s love has changed my life.
If you are interested in building a relationship with Jesus, Park Valley has four campuses: Haymarket, Gainesville, Warrenton, and Manassas. In addition to Park Valley, there are wonderful churches all around filled with people who are ready to help you take the first step toward salvation.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. Want to join the family? To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
I don’t often discuss Joe Biden because, in the grand scheme of things, he is, well, irrelevant. He is a compromise president destined to be forgotten once the American people get their act together and elect better representatives. He will join the likes of James Buchanan and Franklin Pierce as presidents who were just not up for the task.
In addition to his failings as a leader, he is also suffering from what all people suffer from as they age—life. It gets the best of us, and Father Time is undefeated. It’s clear that Uncle Joe from Scaton isn’t the same guy, and it’s time for his friends and family to convince him to retire.
The entire situation is sad. As a parent, I am sad because watching a person lose themselves is hard, much less when it happens on the biggest stage in the world. As a citizen historian, I am sad because America is better than this. The presidency is a place where leaders rise to the challenges of the time, and Biden is not rising; he’s fading.
This is no declaration to support Trump. This is simply what I see, and many citizens I speak with see the same thing. We have eyes. I challenge any Republican who sees Trump as a threat to climb the desk and take a different perspective. While Trump is bad, Biden is also not the guy. Instead of forcing the American people to decide between bad or worse, focus on finding a solution. Focus on finding and lifting up new leaders who will act according to the Constitution and the will of the people. Focus on Congress.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. Want to join the family? To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
In this pod, I sit down with Stephen Kent of Geeky Stoics. In a sprawling conversation, we discuss looking at life and parenting from a different perspective and a little about national politics. We also discuss his passion for community and his decision to run for Manassas City Council.
You can follow Stephen on X @StephenKentX and follow his campaign at www.kentformanassas.com.
Stephen is a thoughtful and wise individual with a gift for storytelling. For entertaining and meaningful content, be sure to subscribe to Geeky Stoics.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. Want to join the family? To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
In this pod, I debate the solutions of faction presented by fictional villain Hank MacLean and founding father James Madison.
A faction, according to Madison in Federalist No. 10
By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.
A faction is a group, and the world is a multiplicity of groups vying for their interests, creating friction and war.
What is the solution to faction?
Hank says,
If the problem with the world is factions endlessly fighting endlessly at war, what is the solution but to get rid of the factions?
Madison says,
There are two methods of curing the mischiefs of faction: the one, by removing its causes; the other, by controlling its effects.
There are again two methods of removing the causes of faction: the one, by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence; the other, by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.
MacLean wants to destroy the other factions and create one group; Madison creates a democratic republic that embraces factions by uniting the 50 state republics with one federal republic. The small groups (state republics) check the big group (federal republic). The democratic principle (the people, a big group) checks the republican principle (the governors, a small group).
MacLean sees power as absolute, while Madison sees it as expanding. MacLean seeks to destroy faction, while Madison creates a place for it to flourish. MacLean creates more death and destruction, while Madison creates a compounded democratic republic that allows factions a way to resolve disputes and work together for the public good. MacLean's solution creates stagnation, while Madison’s creates progress.
This is very relevant today because we have two political parties that seek absolute power, leaving us in a state of stagnation. Whether the candidate is Republican or Democrat, they are both telling us the other group will destroy America unless we give them power. They seek to align the different branches of governments (state and federal) to advance party interests and concentrate power on one side of the Democratic Republic. However, power is a sphere that can not be concentrated on one side and still protect liberty. It must be balanced and growing.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. Want to join the family? To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
In this brief pod, I share a snippet from Federalist No. 10 discussing why political division is a regular occurrence in the American republic and how reform is the pathway to unity. And for reform to happen, everyday citizens must be involved.
“Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.”
While things look bad, it’s been this way before, and America has always managed to reform itself and create progress.
If you like history-filled content with a family focus, subscribe so you don’t miss out on future episodes!
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
P.S. I said continental congress in the pod when I meant to say Articles of Confederation.
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. Want to join the family? To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
This week on the podcast, I am joined by Thomas Howes, Editor-in-Chief for Vital Center Magazine, Austrian Institute Fellow, Lecturer in Politics at Princeton University, and founder of the Reagan Caucus.
We discuss the core principles of republicanism and coalition building. Thomas shares the story of his new coalition, the Reagan Caucus, and how they plan to bring balance to the Republican party.
Thomas is a regular guest who delivers insightful conversation to the podcast, and this episode was no different. If you want to learn more about his organization, check out the new Reagan Caucus website here.
Peace & Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
P.S. Due to technical difficulties, this episode is audio only.
Politics and Parenting is a reader-supported publication. Want to join the family? To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
Eddie Garcia is back on the show to discuss his campaign and the issues on the minds of American families. Eddie shares his perspective on the TikTok ban, the war in Ukraine, the debacle on our southern border, and rising inflation.
Listen in to hear why Eddie doesn’t think Ukraine is winnable and what he would do as a U.S. Senator to support American Families.
Follow Eddie on X @EddieGarciaVA. To learn more about his campaign, visit his website, www.eddiegarciava.com.
Thank you for listening!
Peace & Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
Today, on the podcast, I am joined by Matt Lewis. Matt is a Columnist at the Daily Beast, the author of Fifthly Rich Politicians and Too Dumb to Fail, and the host of the Matt Lewis and the News YouTube channel.
Matt shares his story about how he went from managing a grocery store to managing a successful political campaign. And how his parents supported and inspired him to dream big and take the next step on the American ladder to success.
We discuss the virtues of fatherhood and the conflicts faced with modern-day parenting. Is our next generation safe? And should the government do more to help parents?
Be sure to subscribe to keep up with upcoming articles and podcasts!
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Get full access to Politics and Parenting at www.politicsandparenting.com/subscribe
On this week’s podcast, I speak with Tyler Syck, assistant professor of Political Science at the University of Pikeville, about his new article in Persuasion titled The Americans Who Long for Caesar.
Tyler and I discuss the rise of those clamoring for an authoritarian leader and how this is dangerous to citizen’s freedom and liberty.
You can find all of Tyler’s writings on his website jtylersyck.com
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Thanks for reading Politics and Parenting! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
How can a citizen make an informed decision when the system shields candidates from answering serious questions?
In this brief video, I share the story of how I lost my cool and yelled at a congressional candidate running for office because I was threatened with legal action for harassment simply for wanting to have my questions answered.
Is this the system we want to decide our leaders? How are we supposed to hold them accountable?
Watch on Substack and YouTube and listen on Spotify and Apple.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
In this episode, I discuss the Wonka movie and how it relates to the rise of corporate power in America. I also continue the series on political parties, diving deep into the Federalists and Republicans of the 1790s. In the last segment, I laid out some marketing and leadership ideas for the No Cap Fund.
Wonka
Wonka is a delightful movie to watch with kids of all ages. Wonka is scammed by the fine print in a contract and bullied out of the candy market by a corrupt group of corporations that blackmail local law enforcement to do their bidding. Wonka overcomes these obstacles with hard work, persistence, and hope.
Political Parties (23:56)
In the continuing series on political parties, I dive into the Federalists and Republicans. I discuss how the parties were born of interests and principles. The Federalist's interests were the wealthy and well-connected. Their governing principles were that of Executive and Judicial power to make an immediate change. The Republican's interests were the common man, the farmer, and small industry. Their principles were that of using Congress at the State and Federal level to enact change incrementally over time.
No Cap Fund (49:30)
In the last segment, I share some of the marketing material I have created for No Cap Fund, an organization dedicated to uncapping the House of Representatives. I also discuss what makes good design, marketing, and leadership. If you want to learn more, please visit our website, www.nocapfund.org.
I hope you enjoy the episode. Please leave a comment or question after watching or listening. You can watch it here or on YouTube and listen to it on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
Thanks for reading Politics and Parenting! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
I am joined by Caleb Franz, Program Manager of Young Voices and the first-time Author of The Conductor: The Story of Rev. John Rankin, Abolitionism's Essential Founding Father, which will be available on October 15th.
Caleb is an engaging and thoughtful guest. The conversation bounces back and forth between the man, John Rankin, and the issue that stoked his passions, slavery. We discuss how Rankins's family upbringing prepares him for this task of leadership, along with the foundation of the divide between North and South and slavery and abolitionists.
Be sure to like, subscribe, and comment. Watch on YouTube as well.
Thanks for reading Politics and Parenting! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
Thomas Jefferson was an American statesman, diplomat, lawyer, architect, philosopher, and Founding Father who served as the third President of the United States from 1801 to 1809. He was the main author of the Declaration of Independence and was a proponent of democracy, individual rights, and equality; Jefferson's contributions left an indelible mark on the shaping of American political philosophy and governance.
Before his presidency, he was the first Secretary of State under George Washington and then Vice President to John Adams. Jefferson's presidency is most noted for the Louisiana Purchase, a monumental land acquisition that doubled the size of the United States, and his advocacy for the Lewis and Clark Expedition to explore the western territories.
Jefferson was a Renaissance man with a wide array of interests. He made significant contributions to architecture and education, founding the University of Virginia.
Join me on Monday, March 25th at Heritage Brewing from 6:30 PM to 8:00 to learn more!
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
In this episode, I discuss the history of Political Parties, the Book of Job, and Life. In the first segment, I discuss our founding era and the origin of the first political parties. Why do they exist, and what did they do?
In the second segment, I share a discussion with a friend about discourgment. He recommended reading the Book of Job, and I shared my thoughts on what I read.
In the third segment, I share a tiff my wife and I have about clutter and meal prep. I also talk about my latest article in the Freemen News-Letter about Balancing Authority with Parental Rights.
I hope you enjoy it.
Peace and Love,
Jeff
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
I try this podcast thing alone. I rant and ramble about our Presidential nominees, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and Apportionment, among other things.
Peace and Love,
Jeff
Thanks for reading Politics and Parenting! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
John and I discuss religious freedom, civil rights, and coalition building while sharing the story of Give ‘em Hell Harry and his remarkable upset victory over Thomas Dewey.
You can check out my latest article in the Hill here.
To learn more about the campaign, visit our website beattyfor.us. To sign up to volunteer, click here. To sign up to attend a campaign event, click here.
Click here to register for the Tank Talk of George Washington at Heritage Brewing in Manassas.
Peace and Love,
Jeff Mayhugh
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
One of our favorite guests, Tyler Syck, is back to discuss his new article, Conservatism’s Path Not Taken for Persuasion. Tyler shares his perspective on the current and historical conservative movements and offers a new path. We also discuss the current presidential primary elections and the top contenders, Trump, Haley, and DeSantis.
Peace and Love,
Jeff (The one who used to wear a flannel.)
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
John and I are joined by Tim Carney, an AEI fellow, writer for the Washington Examiner, and author of a new book, Family Unfriendly, available for presale now, hitting the shelves March 18th.
We discuss Tim’s new article about the business dealings of a president and another president’s son while in office. We also dive into his new book and talk about how family and government do and should intertwine.
It was a joy speaking with Tim. Take a listen and ask yourself, should we have Pro Family policy?
Peace & Love,
Jeff
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
John Beatty believes that America’s system of government is inching perilously closer toward a cliff. Social media, cancel culture, and political polarization in our nation have pulled us apart. Our nation was founded on the idea of “e pluribus unum” or “out of many, one.” Virginians in the state's 10th District are now just “one of many.”
Regarding the sour state of American politics, John Beatty says, “Politics has broken down. Our politicians prioritize attacking one another personally on and off the television, and the House floor is nothing but a stage for performance on C-SPAN. Our representatives no longer represent the people, and the people know it.” John continued, “Something has to change, and it's not just who represents Virginia’s 10th District. We need to reform the way the federal government works. That will require boldness and a leader focused on restoring the people's power in the House of Representatives. I am prepared to do just that.”
The Beatty campaign will focus on three R’s—Reform, Representation, and the Republic. Congress must be reformed to expand representation for Americans. To secure our future, we must look to America’s past and rediscover republican principles of government.
John Beatty will work toward the following:
I. Uncap the House by introducing a new apportionment bill.
II. Create a new set of rules in the House of Representatives to balance power between the Speaker and the People's Representatives.
III. Write new campaign finance legislation limiting the influence of “dark” money in American elections.
IV. Introduce a bill instituting term limits for congressional members.
John Beatty is a graduate of Virginia Tech and the Director of Information Technology at The Heights School. He lives in Lovettsville with his wife Katie and their seven children. A devout Catholic, John is a parishioner of St. Francis de Sales Parish, and looks foremost to his faith and his family for guidance. John believes in God, honor, fairness, and forgiveness, which are the traits missing in many of our national legislators. His campaign will engage the unengaged with compassion and civilized debate.
John and his team are excited to work tirelessly not just on winning the election but preparing to govern once elected.
Learn more about John Beatty and his vision at www.beattyfor.us
Media inquiries:
Jeff Mayhugh, (571) 261-8231 or info@beattyfor.us
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
Eddie Garcia is back on the show to discuss what he’s learned from voters while campaigning all over the state of Virginia. We ask him how he will take what he’s learned from the people and put it into action if elected to the US Senate.
https://www.eddiegarciava.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
In this episode, John and I welcome Justin Stapley of The Freemen News-letter, discussing the new intellectual conservative movement, history, and political theory. Justin is an engaging and thoughtful guest. Make sure to give this episode a listen and share it with a friend.
You can find my article mentioned on the pod about Nikki Haley here. And check out these great articles from The Freemen News-Letter on the Boston Tea party. The Boston Tea Party and The British East India Company by Ad Tippet and 'No Taxation Without Representation' by Justin Stapley.
Peace & Love.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
No guests this week. It’s just John and me. We discuss the American Christmas classic It’s a Wonderful Life! and how it relates to our lives, John Bingham and the 14th Amendment, and who's running for Congress in VA-10.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
John and I fanboy over our latest guest, H.W. Brands, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. He is an author and historian. John and I can barely hide our excitement as we discuss how history should be taught, what we can learn from our past, and what made our founders different than modern-day politicians. Were they radicals? Perhaps. Were they bold? Absolutely. The conversation centers around his article written in 2003 for the Atlantic called Founders Chic, and a recent article written on his Substack called Life after Life. Be sure to subscribe to his Substack: A User’s Guide to History.
OH, and stick around for the lightning round and find out who his favorite non-presidential American political figure to study is.
Be sure to pick up a copy of one of his wonderful biographies on Andrew Jackson, Ben Franklin, and more! His latest release is Founding Partisans: Hamilton, Madison, Jefferson, Adams and the Brawling Birth of American Politics.
Peace & Love
“Ambition must be made to counteract ambition,”-- James Madison, Federalist 51
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
In a bonus episode, we are joined by Thomas Howes, editor-in-chief at The Vital Center, to discuss his article in the fall issue, Catholic Scholasticism At The Threshold Of Constitutionalism. It’s an exhilarating conversation, we discuss our constitutional system and the checks and balances it puts in place to protect citizens.
Peace & Love.
“Ambition must be made to counteract ambition,”-- James Madison, Federalist 51
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
Assistant Professor of Political Science and History at the University of Pikeville and Founding editor of The Vital Center, Tyler Syck returns to the show to discuss The Vital Center’s statement of principles and his latest article in the Fall issue entitled Keeping the Republic.
It’s a wonderful conversation around the topics of liberalism, freedom, democracy, republicanism, and parenting. Remember to like, subscribe, and share!
Peace & Love
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
On this week’s episode, John and Jeff discuss why our founding fathers are important, responding to the article Forget the Founding Fathers by Michael Lind of Compact Magazine. They also discuss the latest congressional scandal involving George Santos and his campaign finance violations.
John asks Jeff what he’s been reading, and Jeff asks John what four books influenced his political thought.
Thanks for reading Politics and Parenting! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
Mitch McConnell represents special interests, not the American people — we need campaign finance reform now - Jeff Mayhugh
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
Why Congress https://www.aei.org/research-products/book/why-congress/
Phillip A. Wallach: https://www.aei.org/profile/philip-wallach/
The People’s House has morphed into the Party’s House — it’s time for reform
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4272768-the-peoples-house-has-morphed-into-the-partys-house-its-time-for-reform/
Justin Amash for Speaker of the House | Opinion
https://www.newsweek.com/justin-amash-speaker-opinion-1835879
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
You can purchase the book here.
https://www.amazon.com/Conservative-Futurist-Create-Sci-Fi-Promised/dp/B0BWGFW6XT/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3C0GAZM1QL6WG&keywords=the+conservative+futurist&qid=1698069662&sprefix=the+conservitive+futurist%2Caps%2C124&sr=8-1
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/interactive/2023/capitol-house-representatives-expansion-design/
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicsandparenting.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This episode is a few weeks old. In the hustle and bustle of life and kids, we forgot to post. Please enjoy!
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/matt-lewis/filthy-rich-politicians/9781546004417/?lens=center-street
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/return-of-the-guru-marianne-williamson
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/the-two-lives-of-robert-hanssen/
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
John and Jeff discuss education, new institutions, and community consulting.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
https://votelovejoy.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
https://www.eddiegarciava.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
https://voteruffolo.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Watch on Youtube:
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Pick up a copy of Bad News: How Woke Media is Undermining Democracy
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Jeff speaks with ANDRE BELIVEAUabout the health of conservitism.
https://loneconservative.com/2023/03/25/conservatism-is-not-dead/?s=tyler
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Tyler’s article can be found here.
https://loneconservative.com/2023/03/16/the-end-of-conservatism/
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Watch on YouTube:
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Madisonian Republicans Leadership Positions
President: Jeff Mayhugh
Vice President: John Beatty
Senate: Daniel Beatty, Philip Oravetz, Craig Stewart (looking for eight members)
Policy Director:Responsible for the team writing policy for state and federal
Policy Director:
Policy Team Members: Jeff Mayhugh, John Beatty
Business manager:Responsible for filing paperwork and managing funds.
Social Media Director:Responsible for managing social media accounts and social media advertising.
Education Director: Responsible forteam producing materials and teaching classes.
Educational Director: Jeff Mayhugh
Educational Team Members: John Beatty, Daniel Beatty, Philip Oravetz, Craig Stewart
Events Coordinator:Responsible for planning, organizing, and scheduling events
Fundraising Coordinator:Responsible for fundraising.
Volunteer Coordinator:Responsible for recruiting and managing volunteers who can assist with fundraising, outreach, and other campaign activities.
Political Consultants: Responsible for training and educating local candidates
Members: Jeff Mayhugh, John Beatty
Legal Counsel: Responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable campaign finance and election laws. This may include advising on fundraising practices, coordinating with government agencies, and defending the organization against legal challenges.
Communications Director: The communications director is responsible for developing and executing the organization’s messaging and public relations strategy. This may include creating advertising campaigns, issuing press releases, and coordinating media outreach.
Field Director: The field director is responsible for coordinating grassroots outreach efforts, including canvassing, phone banking, and voter engagement drives.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
RSVP to our March 18th meeting: https://madisonianrepublicans.com/events/representation-is-communication-mar-18
Watch on YouTube
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
RSVP to our March event: https://madisonianrepublicans.com/events/representation-is-communication-mar-18
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Watch on YouTube
Jeff’s Baptism Story on “It’s that Simple”
https://anchor.fm/itsthatsimple/episodes/Tell-Them-in-Love-e1v60nn
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Matt Lewis and the News: Hyrum Lewis
Feb 18th: https://madisonianrepublicans.com/events/howtherepublicworks-feb18
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Feb 18th: https://madisonianrepublicans.com/events/howtherepublicworks-feb18
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
RSVP for Jan 21st: America’s Founding https://madisonianrepublicans.com/events/americasfoundingjan21
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Keep listening for a little bonus info at the end of this episode!
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Note 18. Why 435? - by Steven S. Smith (substack.com)
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Check out the articles mentioned in this episode.
Click the picture below to buy some sweet sweet swag.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Instagram: @jmayhugh
Twitter : @jmayhugh28, @beattyforus
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
The Federalist No. 70
[New York, March 15, 1788]
To the People of the State of New-York.
THERE is an idea, which is not without its advocates, that a vigorous executive is inconsistent with the genius of republican government. The enlightened well wishers to this species of government must at least hope that the supposition is destitute of foundation; since they can never admit its truth, without at the same time admitting the condemnation of their own principles. Energy in the executive is a leading character in the definition of good government. It is essential to the protection of the community against foreign attacks: It is not less essential to the steady administration of the laws, to the protection of property against those irregular and high handed combinations, which sometimes interrupt the ordinary course of justice to the security of liberty against the enterprises and assaults of ambition, of faction and of anarchy. Every man the least conversant in Roman story knows how often that republic was obliged to take refuge in the absolute power of a single man, under the formidable title of dictator, as well against the intrigues of ambitious individuals, who aspired to the tyranny, and the seditions of whole classes of the community, whose conduct threatened the existence of all government, as against the invasions of external enemies, who menaced the conquest and destruction of Rome.
There can be no need however to multiply arguments or examples on this head. A feeble executive implies a feeble execution of the government. A feeble execution is but another phrase for a bad execution: And a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be in practice a bad government.
Taking it for granted, therefore, that all men of sense will agree in the necessity of an energetic executive; it will only remain to inquire, what are the ingredients which constitute this energy—how far can they be combined with those other ingredients which constitute safety in the republican sense? And how far does this combination characterise the plan, which has been reported by the convention?
The ingredients, which constitute energy in the executive, are first unity, secondly duration, thirdly an adequate provision for its support, fourthly competent powers.2
The circumstances3 which constitute safety in the republican sense are, Ist. a due dependence on the people, secondly4 a due responsibility.
Those politicians and statesmen, who have been the most celebrated for the soundness of their principles, and for the justness of their views, have declared in favor of a single executive and a numerous legislature. They have with great propriety considered energy as the most necessary qualification of the former, and have regarded this as most applicable to power in a single hand; while they have with equal propriety considered the latter as best adapted to deliberation and wisdom, and best calculated to conciliate the confidence of the people and to secure their privileges and interests.
That unity is conducive to energy will not be disputed. Decision, activity, secrecy, and5 dispatch will generally characterise the proceedings6 of one man, in a much more eminent degree, than the proceedings of any greater number; and in proportion as the number is increased, these qualities will be diminished.
This unity may be destroyed in two ways; either by vesting the power in two or more magistrates of equal dignity and authority; or by vesting it ostensibly in one man, subject in whole or in part to the controul and co-operation of others, in the capacity of counsellors to him. Of the first the two consuls of Rome may serve as an example; of the last we shall find examples in the constitutions of several of the states. New-York and New-Jersey, if I recollect right, are the only states, which have entrusted the executive authority wholly to single men.* Both these methods of destroying the unity of the executive have their partisans; but the votaries of an executive council are the most numerous. They are both liable, if not to equal, to similar objections; and may in most lights be examined in conjunction.
The experience of other nations will afford little instruction on this head. As far however as it teaches any thing, it teaches us not to be inamoured of plurality in the executive. We have seen that the Achæans on an experiment of two Præetors, were induced to abolish one.7 The Roman history records many instances of mischiefs to the republic from the dissentions between the consuls, and between the military tribunes, who were at times substituted to the consuls. But it gives us no specimens of any peculiar advantages derived to the state, from the circumstance of the8 plurality of those magistrates. That the dissentions between them were not more frequent, or more fatal, is matter of astonishment; until we advert to the singular position in which the republic was almost continually placed and to the prudent policy pointed out by the circumstances of the state, and pursued by the consuls, of making a division of the government between them. The Patricians engaged in a perpetual struggle with the Plebeians for the preservation of their antient authorities and dignities; the consuls, who were generally chosen out of the former body, were commonly united by the personal interest they had in the defence of the privileges of their order. In addition to this motive of union, after the arms of the republic had considerably expanded the bounds of its empire, it became an established custom with the consuls to divide the administration between themselves by lot; one of them remaining at Rome to govern the city and its environs; the other taking the command in the more distant provinces. This expedient must no doubt have had great influence in preventing those collisions and rivalships, which might otherwise have embroiled the peace of9 the republic.
But quitting the dim light of historical research, and attaching ourselves purely to the dictates of reason and good sense, we shall discover much greater cause to reject than to approve the idea of plurality in the executive, under any modification whatever.
Wherever two or more persons are engaged in any common enterprize or pursuit, there is always danger of difference of opinion. If it be a public trust or office in which they are cloathed with equal dignity and authority, there is peculiar danger of personal emulation and even animosity. From either and especially from all these causes, the most bitter dissentions are apt to spring. Whenever these happen, they lessen the respectability, weaken the authority, and distract the plans and operations of those whom they divide. If they should unfortunately assail the supreme executive magistracy of a country, consisting of a plurality of persons, they might impede or frustrate the most important measures of the government, in the most critical emergencies of the state. And what is still worse, they might split the community into the most10 violent and irreconcilable factions, adhering differently to the different individuals who composed the magistracy.
Men often oppose a thing merely because they have had no agency in planning it, or because it may have been planned by those whom they dislike. But if they have been consulted and have happened to disapprove, opposition then becomes in their estimation an indispensable duty of self love. They seem to think themselves bound in honor, and by all the motives of personal infallibility to defeat the success of what has been resolved upon, contrary to their sentiments. Men of upright, benevolent tempers have too many opportunities of remarking with horror, to what desperate lengths this disposition is sometimes carried, and how often the great interests of society are sacrificed to the vanity, to the conceit and to the obstinacy of individuals, who have credit enough to make their passions and their caprices interesting to mankind. Perhaps the question now before the public may in its consequences afford melancholy proofs of the effects of this despicable frailty, or rather detestable vice in the human character.
Upon the principles of a free government, inconveniencies from the source just mentioned must necessarily be submitted to in the formation of the legislature; but it is unnecessary and therefore unwise to introduce them into the constitution of the executive. It is here too that they may be most pernicious. In the legislature, promptitude of decision is oftener an evil than a benefit. The differences of opinion, and the jarrings of parties in that department of the government, though they may sometimes obstruct salutary plans, yet often promote deliberations and circumspection; and serve to check excesses in the majority. When a resolution too is once taken, the opposition must be at an end. That resolution is a law, and resistance to it punishable. But no favourable circumstances palliate or atone for the disadvantages of dissention in the executive department. Here they are pure and unmixed. There is no point at which they cease to operate. They serve to embarrass and weaken the execution of the plan or measure, to which they relate, from the first step to the final conclusion of it. They constantly counteract those qualities in the executive, which are the most necessary ingredients in its composition, vigour and expedition, and this without any counterballancing good. In the conduct of war, in which the energy of the executive is the bulwark of the national security, every thing would be to be apprehended from its plurality.
It must be confessed that these observations apply with principal weight to the first11 case supposed, that is to a plurality of magistrates of equal dignity and authority; a scheme the advocates for which are not likely to form a numerous sect: But they apply, though not with equal, yet with considerable weight, to the project of a council, whose concurrence is made constitutionally necessary to the operations of the ostensible executive. An artful cabal in that council would be able to distract and to enervate the whole system of administration. If no such cabal should exist, the mere diversity of views and opinions would alone be sufficient to tincture the exercise of the executive authority with a spirit of habitual feebleness and delatoriness.
But one of the weightiest objections to a plurality in the executive, and which lies as much against the last as the first plan, is that it tends to conceal faults, and destroy responsibility. Responsibility is of two kinds, to censure and to punishment. The first is the most important of the two; especially in an elective office. Man,12 in public trust, will much oftener act in such a manner as to render him13 unworthy of being any longer trusted, than in such a manner as to make him14 obnoxious to legal punishment. But the multiplication of the executive adds to the difficulty of detection in either case. It often becomes impossible, amidst mutual accusations, to determine on whom the blame or the punishment of a pernicious measure, or series of pernicious measures ought really to fall. It is shifted from one to another with so much dexterity, and under such plausible appearances, that the public opinion is left in suspense about the real author. The circumstances which may have led to any national miscarriage or misfortune are sometimes so complicated, that where there are a number of actors who may have had different degrees and kinds of agency, though we may clearly see upon the whole that there has been mismanagement, yet it may be impracticable to pronounce to whose account the evil which may have been incurred is truly chargeable.
“I was overruled by my council. The council were so divided in their opinions, that it was impossible to obtain any better resolution on the point.” These and similar pretexts are constantly at hand, whether true or false. And who is there that will either take the trouble or incur the odium of a strict scrutiny into the secret springs of the transaction? Should there be found a citizen zealous enough to undertake the unpromising task, if there happen to be a collusion between the parties concerned, how easy is it to cloath the circumstances with so much ambiguity, as to render it uncertain what was the precise conduct of any of those parties?
In the single instance in which the governor of this state is coupled with a council, that is in the appointment to offices, we have seen the mischiefs of it in the view now under consideration.15 Scandalous appointments to important offices have been made. Some cases indeed have been so flagrant, that ALL PARTIES have agreed in the impropriety of the thing. When enquiry has been made, the blame has been laid by the governor on the members of the council; who on their part have charged it upon his nomination: While the people remain altogether at a loss to determine by whose influence their interests have been committed to hands so unqualified, and16 so manifestly improper. In tenderness to individuals, I forbear to descend to particulars.
It is evident from these considerations, that the plurality of the executive tends to deprive the people of the two greatest securities they can have for the faithful exercise of any delegated power; first, the restraints of public opinion, which lose their efficacy as well on account of the division of the censure attendant on bad measures among a number, as on account of the uncertainty on whom it ought to fall; and secondly, the opportunity of discovering with facility and clearness the misconduct of the persons they trust, in order either to their removal from office, or to their actual punishment, in cases which admit of it.
In England the king is a perpetual magistrate; and it is a maxim, which has obtained for the sake of the public peace, that he is unaccountable for his administration, and his person sacred. Nothing therefore can be wiser in that kingdom than to annex to the king a constitutional council, who may be responsible to the nation for the advice they give. Without this there would be no responsibility whatever in the executive department; an idea inadmissible in a free government. But even there the king is not bound by the resolutions of his council, though they are answerable for the advice they give. He is the absolute master of his own conduct, in the exercise of his office; and may observe or disregard the council given to him at his sole discretion.
But in a republic, where every magistrate ought to be personally responsible for his behaviour in office, the reason which in the British constitution dictates the propriety of a council not only ceases to apply, but turns against the institution. In the monarchy of Great-Britain, it furnishes a substitute for the prohibited responsibility of the chief magistrate; which serves in some degree as a hostage to the national justice for his good behaviour. In the American republic it would serve to destroy, or would greatly diminish the intended and necessary responsibility of the chief magistrate himself.
The idea of a council to the executive, which has so generally obtained in the state constitutions, has been derived from that maxim of republican jealousy, which considers power as safer in the hands of a number of men than of a single man. If the maxim should be admitted to be applicable to the case, I should contend that the advantage on that side would not counterballance the numerous disadvantages on the opposite side. But I do not think the rule at all applicable to the executive power. I clearly concur in opinion in this particular with a writer whom the celebrated Junius17 pronounces to be “deep, solid and ingenious,” that, “the executive power is more easily confined when it is one:”*18 That it is far more safe there should be a single object for the jealousy and watchfulness of the people; and20 in a word that all multiplication of the executive is rather dangerous than friendly to liberty.
A little consideration will satisfy us, that the species of security sought for in the multiplication of the executive is unattainable. Numbers must be so great as to render combination difficult; or they are rather a source of danger than of security. The united credit and influence of several individuals must be more formidable to liberty than the credit and influence of either of them separately. When power therefore is placed in the hands of so small a number of men, as to admit of their interests and views being easily combined in a common enterprise, by an artful leader, it becomes more liable to abuse and more dangerous when abused, than if it be lodged in the hands of one man; who from the very circumstance of his being alone will be more narrowly watched and more readily suspected, and who cannot unite so great a mass of influence as when he is associated with others. The Decemvirs of Rome, whose name denotes their number,† were more to be dreaded in their usurpation than any ONE of them would have been. No person would think of proposing an executive much more numerous than that body, from six to a dozen have been suggested for the number of the council. The extreme of these numbers is not too great for an easy combination; and from such a combination America would have more to fear, than from the ambition of any single individual. A council to a magistrate, who is himself responsible for what he does, are generally nothing better than a clog upon his good intentions; are often the instruments and accomplices of his bad, and are almost always a cloak to his faults.
I forbear to dwell upon the subject of expence; though it be evident that if the council should be numerous enough to answer the principal end, aimed at by the institution, the salaries of the members, who must be drawn from their homes to reside at the seat of government, would form an item in the catalogue of public expenditures, too serious to be incurred for an object of equivocal utility.
I will only add, that prior to the appearance of the constitution, I rarely met with an intelligent man from any of the states, who did not admit as the result of experience, that the UNITY of the Executive of this state was one of the best of the distinguishing features of our constitution.
PUBLIUS.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com
Buzzfeed: How much it costs to make a dress
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicsandparenting.substack.com