Midday Rant ™: Recent Episodes

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

You may have already noticed, but June is the month during which all of the major companies, obviously social media giants like Google, Twitter, government agencies and the like have scheduled to bombard you with their campaign to normalise behaviour that is antithetical to the Torah and for that matter, every idolatry practiced by billions of people, in fact, a considerable majority of the worldwide population.

Let’s get the disclaimer out of the way. My comments here and elsewhere are not ‘hateful conduct’ and my opinion is not intended to “promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.”

On the contrary, this month-long deluge of behaviour that is antithetical to the Torah is targeting religious affiliation and should be prevented by companies who claim to police the Internet. But their social ‘justice’ is selective.

These companies and agencies have an agenda, which is to force you to accept behaviour that is contrary to the teaching of [your] religion. It’s sort of like forcing a bakery to make a cake but on a global scale. And if you don’t submit, if you don’t accept, if don’t demonstrate a deep pleasure or satisfaction for that behavior, they will punish you. They will deny you your free speech rights, in favour of the “rights” of those whose behaviour they seek to promote.

Today, Twitter suspended my personal account for 12 hours because of my reply to an offending Tweet by Elad Strohmayer (https://twitter.com/EladStr) that included the Foreign Ministry for Israel (https://twitter.com/IsraelMFA), in which I asked a simple question. I asked: “Is there no bottom to this…?” And I’m leaving out one five-letter word from that question, a five-letter word which is not recognised by anyone, anywhere as being obscene. But a five-letter word that Twitter claims turned my simple question into “Hateful Conduct”. To confirm, there was no threat. There was no individual person targeted by my Tweet. It would be like asking the question, “is there no bottom to the Left’s lying?”. Go ahead and run through your own list of five-letter words, and you decide.

But I have another question. Why is Twitter, Google and all of the promoters of this behaviour entitled to ignore my faith, no, not ignore my beliefs, why are they entitled to debase my religious beliefs and the beliefs of billions of people around the world, in favour of any other group’s private activities, or at least what should be private activities?

To be clear, I don’t care what anyone does in the privacy of their consensual relationships with other people. The personal challenge and test these people are living will be judged by G-D, whether or not they believe in G-D. It’s not for me to decide. But if you’re Jewish and you’re encouraging other Jews to violate Halakha, or Jewish Law, then, it is my obligation to point that out.

But Twitter, Google, and the others, will force us to endure a month-long assault and their attempts to normalise behaviour that is contrary to our religious beliefs and worse, we’re not allowed to politely express an objecting opinion. They’re violating their own “police powers” by allowing, no, encouraging people to post content that seeks to debase my religious beliefs. Who gives these companies the right to do that?

Where’s the Bottom to This?

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

The racists are at it again. Truth is, they never actually stopped.

Tim Wise, who peddles himself as an ‘Anti-racist educator’, argued on MSNBC’s The ReidOut that the Second Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights to stop slave rebellions rather than protect individual gun rights.

Before I begin, just a quick detour on the subject of Wise being an ‘Anti-racist’… or an Anti-racist educator, whatever, I have the same yardstick for anyone who describes themselves as not being ‘Antisemitic’. If you have to tell me that you’re not, then you are. The evidence of you not being an antisemite or a racist is your actions not what you’re saying. So, if you need to tell me you’re Anti-racist, you’re probably one of their leaders.

Anyway, it was just one year ago that Carol Anderson, who is a professional racist currently drawing a salary as “professor” of African American Studies at Emory University, was touting her book, The Second: Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America, in which Anderson argued poorly that the “well-regulated Militia” found in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was created to provide states with a mechanism to quell potential slave uprisings.

It’s only a week after the Uvalde Texas school shooting, but these racists are drudging up this false narrative once again. The fact that a majority of the citizens of Uvalde are Hispanic, as were most of the murdered students, AND the nutcase shooter… this obvious inconsistency in their philosophy does not seem to register with these idiots.

In an op-ed for The Washington Post in 2014, Anderson argued that the unrest following the 2014 Ferguson shooting was a manifestation of "white rage", or white backlash against African American advancement. Her resulting book, White Rage: The Unspoken Truth of Our Racial Divide, expanded on this ridiculous theory.

People like Anderson and those who peddle this narrative again, like Tim Wise, in the wake of the mass shooting at Uvalde are the true racists. Even a cursory inspection of the historical documents exposes the foolishness of Anderson’s theory and likewise anyone who repeats her nonsense.

James Madison certainly gets credit, in June 1789, for the words “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,” and “A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country,” against a tyrannical government.

But Samuel Adams had made the same sentiments a year prior during the Massachusetts ratifying convention, where he proclaimed “the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms…”

Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay collectively wrote eighty-five essays, known as the Federalist Papers, to persuade people, from those in politics to the average citizen, that the new Constitution would be an aid in the growth of the young nation.

Continue Reading --> https://www.wirenews.org/post/midday-rant-it-s-always-about-racism-for-the-racists

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Maybe you’ve heard the term “ESG” and perhaps you’re thinking that it has something to do with the environment or so-called “global warming” and you could be forgiven for thinking that because people like Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates and their ilk want you to think that. But you’d be wrong. So, what is ESG? What does it mean? And what is it really?

Well, the initials stand for “Environmental, social, and corporate governance”, but they left out the “C”, which according to the official description is the most important part of what they’re doing… because officially, ESG ‘…is an approach to evaluating the extent to which a corporation works on behalf of social goals that go beyond the role of a corporation to maximize profits on behalf of the corporation's shareholders’. That’s what it says on the can. But what are these Communists really doing?

And I say Communists because for example, out of 435 ESG stakeholder proposals in 2021, just 22 were conservative. By the way, ESG is where we began hearing the term “stakeholder”, which according to ESG proponents, is everyone on the planet, but I digress. A March 2021 article published by Reuters entitled “Right-wing activists pose challenge to ESG crusade” went on to warn people that Conservatives were the problem. This means that Democrats and Leftists generally, you know, the neo-Communists, are the ones behind the ESG movement or what Reuters describes as a crusade.

When you have a minute, go to Google or any other search engine and type in the name of your bank or mobile/cellphone provider or any other large company; it doesn’t matter and the letters “ESG” and you will be shown a page dedicated to literally bragging about what that company is doing to increase its ESG Rating.

The most widely referenced ESG rating has an upper rank of Triple-A, dropping down to Double-A, companies in these top two levels are Leaders. Then moving down there is A, and Triple B, companies here are just Average. Then it gets a little fuzzy but moving down still further you find companies ranked as Double B, B, and Triple-C, and companies in the last two rankings are described as Laggards. There are corresponding numerical scores for the ABC ranking from zero at the very bottom to 10.00 at the top and I think this numerical rating system is the best part of their movement.

Let’s get back to what this crusade is trying to do. ESG, really, has very little to do with the environment, or global warming, or climate change, or whatever these nuts are calling it now, and you know this because if it was really in aid of the environment, then, they, the proponents of ESG, would be the first reduce their own carbon footprint. They would be the first to get rid of their private jets or jet-pool… what we call commercial air travel because after all, they’re megalomaniacs, not hypocrites, right?

ESG is being sold to you as having something to do with the environment because most people are easily conned into thinking that CO2, you know, the gas that every breathing creature on the earth exhales, is the real problem and that this “poison”, the thing that’s gonna kill is all, that every green plant on the earth depends on to survive, has to be reduced… because, well, not to put too fine a point on it, the people behind ESG know that most people are basically stupid.

Continue Reading --> https://www.wirenews.org/post/midday-rant-esg

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

As you know, a couple of weeks ago, the U.S. Congress gifted Ukraine $40 billion, a total of $58 billion of taxpayers’ money, so far this year, despite the efforts of Senator Rand Paul.

And since 2020, Congress has passed three COVID relief packages that add up to over $190 billion for public and private schools. The vast majority of that money has gone to school districts and remains unspent, with some estimates that more than 80% or over $150 billion of the money remains unallocated.

Remember when Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats and even some Republicans said the country couldn’t afford just $5 billion President Trump had requested to secure the nation’s southern border? These same people have no difficulty spending over $200 billion, of your money, for their projects.

So, in the wake of yet another school shooting, after 19 students and two teachers were murdered in Uvalde Texas, because the school district there refused to spend money to secure the safety of those children, remember, it’s not because there isn’t enough money. The government is awash with cash for Ukraine and for schools to buy equipment so that teachers don’t have to attend schools, to do their jobs, the government just doesn’t have money to protect our country, and the school administrators never have any money to protect your children.

Thank G-D, my children are out of school with two of them having recently graduated from universities, but if you have children in school, in America, and you’re paying tax, ask yourself, why are you voting for people who refuse to protect you and your children? Why are you allowing these school administrators to have jobs that you pay for with your tax dollars?

When are you going to say enough? When are you going to put a stop to the government’s unchecked foreign spending? When are you going to tell these people that their services are no longer required?

When my kids were in high school, in the UK, I recall every time I went to their school that I had to be granted access to the building. There were two doors and both of them were locked, and someone was there to ensure that my reason for being there was legitimate and that I wasn’t a threat to anyone inside that school. It’s not rocket science. It’s common sense.

But Leftists want to ban guns. The ‘Progressives’ want more laws when really, all that needs to be done is to spend the money schools already have to provide an adequate level of protection for children and teachers. You can ban every gun and even if you could collect them all (and good luck with that), the crazies would just use knives or baseball bats or whatever they can get their hands on… It’s not the weapon that’s the problem. It’s the crazy people and the total lack of security at what has been intentionally and foolishly created as a gun-free zone.

And frankly, there’d be a lot more money to protect your children at school if our ‘leaders’ would stop sending our money to Ukraine and to Iran and all the other foreign nations. As voters, we elect Representatives and Senators to protect our interests, in our state, not to worry about the rest of the world. Back in March, in another of my Rants, I spoke about Government Spending, and so I’ll repeat … an intervention is needed, while there’s still a country to save.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Yesterday, 21 people, including 19 children at the Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas were murdered by 18-year-old Salvador Ramos. Ramos, who was shot and killed by a U.S. Border Patrol agent, was a resident of Uvalde and he was also a local student at Uvalde High School.

Additionally, 10 other people were injured, including Ramos’ own grandmother who he had shot at their home before he set off to launch his attack at 11:30 am local time.

After arriving at the school, Ramos apparently crashed his vehicle into a ditch but he was able to get into the school despite trading shots with a police officer, who he wounded.

As is always the case after a shooting, Leftists sprang into action demanding more gun control, in other words, more laws, but Ramos had legally purchased the semi-automatic rifle he used to commit murder, from a local gun store on May 16, 2022, which incidentally, was his 18th birthday. So-called “progressives” don’t want gun control. What these people really mean by gun control is the banning of certain types of weapons. And allowing them to ban one type will only lead to more bans.

Later, yesterday evening, formerly Vice President Biden asked the nation to pray for the victims and their families and he said the nation has to ask itself "When in G-D’s name are we going to stand up to the gun lobby? When in G-D’s name will we do what we all know in our gut needs to be done?"

So, once again, Democrats are demanding that Congress ban the so-called ‘Assault Rifle’ or AR-15, which was the weapon used by Ramos. The reason that the NRA, the National Rifle Association or ‘gun lobby’ works against efforts to ban any weapon, apart from the obvious Second Amendment Constitutional right, is that banning weapons will simply not prevent these attacks.

It's a fact that Ramos or anyone else could have used another type of weapon or method to achieve the same result, had an AR-15 not been available. And I am certain that a 17-shot Glock 19 and a knapsack full of magazines would have worked just as effectively. And depending on which AR-15 you buy, they’re about the same price as a Glock, so banning AR-15s is not the answer.

But school security is... I am calling on school administrators to do what we all know in our gut needs to be done. Schools must beef up security by restricting access to a single controllable entry point or ensure that all entrances are locked with video, or CCTV and either a dedicated security employee or one of the administrators granting access after they have verified that the visitor poses no threat and this may also include checking bags.

Everyone at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde would be alive today if the administrators of that school had simply provided adequate security to protect students and teachers. If Ramos had been denied entry, 21 people would not have been murdered in that school. We don’t need to ban weapons. We need to protect ourselves from crazy people who get them. It’s that simple.

Banning guns is not the answer. More laws is not the answer. The reason crazies like Ramos pick schools to shoot up is that they are gun-free zones, with little or no security. Those parents who today mourn the deaths of their children would gladly accept tighter security at their dead child’s school if they could have them back home safe and sound.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

I suspect that some of you may not even know who or what the “WHO” is…

Well, the World Health Organization (or the WHO) is one of the many United Nations agencies, and this one was created in July 1946, which according to its own statement “… connects nations, partners and people to promote health, keep the world safe and serve the vulnerable – so everyone, everywhere can attain the highest level of health”.

During the recent pandemic, in March 2021, 24 elected officials and one unelected employee (of the WHO), including the UK’s Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, the leaders of Fiji, Romania, Greece, Spain, Germany, France, Albania and let’s not forget Ukraine, among others, got together and published a joint article in several newspapers, calling for a more joined-up approach to pandemics in the future.

What followed was a proposal for what these leaders called the WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty. At the end of November, the WHO’s World Health Assembly met in a special session to discuss the proposal and to map out the way forward.

Most of you will be aware that the United Kingdom only recently extricated the country from the European Union, so it is puzzling, at best, why Boris Johnson would entertain, much less have initiated the process of such a Treaty. A Treaty that will, for all intents and purposes, make whatever the WHO decides “for our health” compulsory and very likely legally binding upon the country and its citizens.

And while negotiations on the precise wording of the Treaty are still progressing under the direction of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body at the WHO, the initial meeting did not support a widespread public consultation.

The first meeting took place in April 2022 but invited only limited submissions from “stakeholders” and the general public in response to a guiding question of “What substantive elements do you think should be included in a new international instrument on pandemic preparedness and response?”

In other words, the impression was one of a foregone conclusion that such a Treaty would be agreed. Following that, less than two weeks was allowed for written submissions from the public. The second meeting is due to take place next month, in June.

And you can expect that regardless of mounting public objection, a Treaty will be agreed and proponents of the initiative, including the UK, EU, and others have supported a legally binding treaty, with the EU suggesting that the final “international instrument” would also be binding in international law. So, the UK left the overbearing control of the European Community to submit to the control of the World Health Organization.

We have all witnessed that the one-size-fits-all approach for pandemics, does not work. And yet these people, including Boris Johnson, seem willing to surrender the sovereignty and independence of our nations to a group of unelected bureaucrats, in Switzerland.

Somehow, the WHO has positioned itself from “promoting health”, to dictating to us how we will live, what we can do, and when we can do it.

And at this stage, I am not entirely sure what can be done to prevent this WHO Treaty from becoming law. But once law, I’m confident there will be very few places in the world where we can be safe from its influence.

What do I know is that this type of non-government, government overreach is not consistent with any “democracy” I have ever seen, but what I’m seeing does compare to the totalitarian behaviour of every dictatorship and Communist government throughout history.

WHO do you trust? I, for one, trust no one. Least of all the WHO or our current elected officials, who are literally selling us out to a group of unelected bureaucrats.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Are you watching the trial? You know, “THE TRIAL”, the only thing that really matters, right now? Forget inflation, forget about Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter, the crisis at the Southern border in America, or fuel prices, everywhere. Right now, what matters to everyone is whether or not Johnny Depp is a wife-beater, as alleged by his ex-wife, Amber Heard.

These allegations were first made, by Heard, when she filed for divorce and then as part of a settlement with Depp, she withdrew those statements and was paid millions of dollars, which she said would be donated to charity. Yeah, well, she didn’t do that… Shocking, I know.

In November 2020, Depp lost his UK libel case against The Sun newspaper over an article that called him a "wife-beater", which followed Heard’s now infamous Washington Post editorial in which she didn’t name Depp, but defamed him, nevertheless.

Which brings us to this latest trial, brought by Depp, in the United States. Heard’s lawyers are focusing on Depp’s substance abuse and Depp’s evidence is that it was Heard who was abusive toward him, while Heard counters that her former husband was a “monster”, a “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” character, whose personality changed depending on whether he was under the influence of drugs, something she says was a regular occurrence.

In the final analysis, your take on the trial, thus far, will depend on whether you’re sympathetic to the allegations of Amber Heard or not. I have tried to follow this train-wreck of a marriage, the divorce, the first trial in the UK and now this one in the state of Virginia, with an open mind.

But honestly, having listened to the numerous audios and after hearing the testimony of both Depp and Heard and their respective witnesses, I believe that Johnny Depp was more likely the one being battered. I don’t believe Heard’s testimony and many of her witnesses seemed to be working off a prepared script that aims to paint Depp as a violent person, something his own testimony and the audios simply do not support.

In my opinion, Amber Heard is a manipulative, evil person. I think the only reason that Depp didn’t beat her to death is that he was wasted most of the time and I think a majority of his drug dependency can be put down to his desperate need to escape, from his wife.

Johnny Deep, a wife-beater? Forget it. Poor sod, frankly I’m surprised we’re not reading about a murder-suicide, instead of this trial. But in any case, my verdict is for the Plaintiff.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

I’ve had a few days off from my ‘Ranting’ while I moved our company’s websites and other media content from Amazon’s AWS platform to a collection of our own dedicated servers. I might do a video about that later, but suffice it to say, I won’t pay Amazon so that company can promote the murder of unborn children... It’s a minor protest, but revolutions have begun with less. Mayside Partners is taking a close look at everyone we do business with and making appropriate changes were possible.

Moving on rarely does a website grab my attention with sufficient impact to cause me to comment publicly, but last night I noticed one. ICU LLC, a nonprofit research group, calling itself Marco Polo, and led by former Trump White House staffer Garrett Ziegler, launched BidenLaptopEmails.com.

Everyone will recall how, when news of Hunter Biden’s laptop was published by the New York Post, shortly before the 2020 Presidential Election, all of the social media giants ‘circled the wagons’ to protect Joe Biden’s campaign. The Post even had its Twitter account suspended. Anyone who tried to share or DM links to the explosive news article found their posts deleted, their messages censored, and, in many cases, their accounts permanently disabled.

Exposing the truth and corruption of the Biden Family and the direct links that former Vice President Biden and his family have with the governments of China, Ukraine, Russia and others is not Marco Polo’s only mission, but this story is one that should capture the attention of every American, with the exception of the Communists on the Left.

In essence, the website is a document dump; a lot like WikiLeaks that currently has a collection of 128,775 emails that were taken from Hunter Biden’s laptop, the one this dumbass left with a repair shop in Delaware. And as nearly everyone now knows that laptop became ‘abandoned property’ when Hunter failed to collect it.

If the truth is important to you, I would encourage you to visit BidenLaptopEmails.com. Have a look, or if you prefer, the website also allows users to download all the emails for either Mac or Windows computers. And while the ‘cat is well and truly out of the bag’ now, I would grab a copy of the emails, just in case, the Democrats get the website taken offline.

Among the tens of thousands of emails in the searchable database, you will easily find the infamous ‘10 for the big guy’ message, in which that scumbag Hunter, and his business partner, discuss holding 10% of the equity in their multi-million-dollar deal with the Chinese on behalf of his father, Joe Biden.

Another email shows Hunter inviting his foreign business partners and associates to a 2015 dinner at a Washington DC restaurant, where the email confirms his father will secretly be joining them. The White House at first denied Joe Biden was there, but eventually his spokesperson was forced to retract the lie when photographs emerged from the event.

We know that these people, Biden’s family, and Democrats, generally, are brazen liars and criminals. And if you’ve watched Dinesh D’Souza’s film 2000 Mules, you know that these Communists stole the 2020 election. Dinesh’s movie focused on just one method used by Leftists to prevent President Trump’s reelection.

Of course, there were many others, including unlawfully changing the rules in several states to permit last-minute mail-in ballots, accepting ballots from people who had moved out of state, from dead people, denying Trump voters the chance to vote in person because it was claimed they had already voted by mail and then literally stuffing the ballot box with duplicate ballots.

Continue reading ===> https://www.wirenews.org/post/midday-rant-forget-wikileaks-biden-emails-exposed

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Honestly, I am still trying to figure out how we got into this mess. How is it that governments, all around the world, find themselves empowered or emboldened to take billions in taxpayers’ money, and to send it to support Ukraine, without a national referendum? Not that I support referendums, because I don’t, but here in the UK, for example, people are being told they’ll need to wait 9 hours for an ambulance, while our government ships ambulances to Ukraine.

And in the United States, the House of Representatives has passed a Bill to send another $40 billion to Ukraine, bringing the total to $58 billion this year, and that Bill is currently being considered by the U.S. Senate and frankly, the only thing preventing it from being passed is Senator Rand Paul, who is asking for an amendment, to add an oversight requirement; in other words, to monitor who gets the money. This seems to be a real problem for both Democrats and RiNOs alike.

But I want to focus on who said these elected officials can spend our tax money outside the country, at these outrageously high levels? I am not saying they haven’t done it before or that there isn’t a provision in some law, passed by our ‘leaders’ to do it, but I am asking again, who says they can do it? The answer is really quite simple. We do. We allow them to waste our money and they have become really quite proficient at doing it. Another question I have is when are we going to do something to stop them from wasting our money?

Many people, our citizens, are really suffering. For over two years, our government imposed ridiculous restrictions upon us, closed nearly every business, prevented us from working, and in many cases forced people to submit to experimental medication that was both unnecessary and ineffective. What long-term harm that drug will cause is anyone’s guess, but what we know is that the actions of our governments have nearly bankrupted our nations.

And naturally, being nearly bankrupt, these idiots that ‘lead’ us think it’s a great idea to send billions in money and equipment to Ukraine, which for the record, and as a side note, didn’t submit to the mass vaccination of its citizens, but I digress.

Our counties are struggling under the pressure of runaway inflation, we’re beginning to experience food shortages, including baby formula, in America, as just one example, while our government supplies Ukraine whatever that country needs, including baby formula, food, fuel, and ambulances, not to mention limitless supplies of cash.

I know this is gonna sound really harsh, but I don’t care what Vladimir Putin does in Ukraine. If he attacked the United States or Great Britain, how many billions would Ukraine send our way? Oh, I know, Ukraine has paid former Vice President Biden’s family tens of millions, but somehow that doesn’t help us, does it?

Our governments, supported by corporate media, have convinced a great many people to add a Ukrainian flag to their social media profiles making everyone more sympathetic to their plight. When I log into my bank’s App, I am encouraged to donate to the DEC’s Humanitarian Appeal. Most of the large companies are in on this fleecing as well, with endless links to donate and others promoting pro-Ukrainian news to our newsfeeds and if that isn’t enough, which you could almost accept, government also takes our taxes, without asking, and sends them to support Ukraine, while our citizens suffer.

And if you listen closely, you can actually hear our leaders say Qu'ils mangent de la brioche!

Well, I have another question, you have cake? Or did they send that to Ukraine too?

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

For far too long, Republicans and Conservatives, generally, have taken what they consider ‘the High Road’, choosing not to, as they describe it, ‘stoop’ to the depths of behaviour used by the DemocRATS.

And while that might have worked, say, 30 or 40 years ago, today’s Democrat wants to disrupt, to tear down, to destroy our society and so if we continue to follow these rules, which we have imposed on ourselves, that plan is going to fail miserably.

In case you haven’t noticed, Democrats, Leftists of “... Every Stripe and Hue” perceive order or kindness from their opponents who follow ‘the rules’, who fight by the ‘Queensbury Rules’ as weakness, and they use this noble characteristic as an opportunity to advance their agenda, at any cost.

They use the courts, packed with activist judges when they cannot convince voters to support their ludicrous progressive policies. They steal elections when their opponents look set to recapture public office, and then, they protest, seek to intimidate, and harass when they cannot wait for elections to steal.

In the last few years, we have witnessed rioting, businesses being looted, homes and businesses being destroyed, justices being intimidated, threats to blow up the Senate filibuster, more threats to pack the court with sympathetic judges, attempts to add states to our Union, all because they cannot simply convince a majority of the people to support their views.

Beginning in 2020 in their quest to “convince voters” of their policies the Democrats have killed 35 people, injured 1,500 police officers and caused more than $2 billion in property damage… but all that is perfectly acceptable to a Leftist because their guy wasn’t in the White House. Now, they have the White House, an election they stole, and what did we do?

Crickets.

That’s what we did.

For days now, Democrat zealots have been protesting outside the homes of Supreme Court justices and the White House does nothing. The Justice Department does nothing, despite it being a federal crime to picket or protest at or near a judge’s home pursuant 18 U.S.C. § 1507 "with The Intent of Influencing [the] Judge". And what do we do?

Crickets.

That’s what we did.

Why haven’t Republicans organized outside the homes of Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan? Why not? Get up in their face as Democrats say. Shout and scream outside their homes. Follow them to restaurants. Disrupt their lives. Never use physical violence (like Democrats do, at least not yet) but DO disrupt their lives. And force the Justice Department and the local authorities to do their job. Make them arrest the Conservative protesters while they ignore Democrats. Make them do it.

I say let’s end the ‘Queensbury Rules’ approach. It doesn’t work.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Once again Dinesh D’Souza has knocked it out of the park!

Last night I watched his latest film, 2000 Mules, which clearly exposes the truth that everyone knows, even the Leftists know it, but no one is allowed to say. That the Democrats stole the 2020 election.

If you dispute that statement, but haven’t watched the film, you know, actually watched it… And I’m not talking about you having read some nonsense written by a chubby-cheeked Leftist subbing for NPR or the Denver Post, what I’m saying, is if you have not actually watched the (slightly) more than 120 minutes of film, then shut up. I honestly don’t want to hear from you.

But if you have watched the film and you don’t accept that there were hundreds of thousands of ballots accepted as valid, which were fraudulently collected, by a very well organized cartel intent on stealing the election, then, either you were involved in the scheme or you’re a shill for the Democrat Party or both. You’re also a traitor to your country and a morally bankrupt individual.

If, however, you want to learn the truth, then, watch the film. If you can’t afford to access it, then, DM me @realBillWhite and I’ll help you out.

Anyway, at one point toward the end of the film, Charlie Kirk says the Left will seek to smear 2000 Mules and Dinesh personally, and just as expected, even before its official release, Leftist publications have attacked the geotracking used to identify the “mules” from government surveillance video describing this tool as ‘imprecise’ and ‘inaccurate’.

But Chief Justice John Roberts, who is hardly Rightwing, wrote in a 2018 opinion “When Government tracks the location of a cell phone, it achieves near perfect surveillance as if it had attached an ankle monitor to the phone’s user.”

And then in December 2019, the so-called ‘newspaper of record’, the New York Times published a piece they called "One Nation, Tracked" and described the accuracy of geotracking as follows "A single dot appeared on the screen representing the precise location of someone in President Trump's entourage at 7:10 a.m. It lingered around the grounds of the president's Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Fla., where the president was staying, for about an hour."

Of course, as with everything associated with the Democrats, when it serves their purpose, they say one thing and then another when it doesn’t. But the evidence of election fraud is there for everyone to see. This technology is the same used by law enforcement to catch child killers, as noted in the film and so to suggest that it’s not accurate because it does not serve your purpose, if disingenuous, or just Leftist, but I repeat myself.

My advice is to watch the film. It records more than 2,000 criminals committing nearly one million felonies in multiple states. All it takes is for ONE Federal Agent or one Sheriff to step up and to do the right thing. To do their jobs.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

It’s Mother’s Day! Or is it?

“Mother’s Day” is celebrated by billions of people around the world. And because today is the second Sunday in May, many people call it Mother’s Day, which this year coincides with International Women's Day, but next year it won’t.

The rest of the world celebrates it on various dates in February, March, April, other dates in the month of May, June, July, August, September and October.

And in Israel, we celebrate Family Day, on the 30th of Shevat, which this year was February 1st just past.

So, you see, the global community can’t EVEN agree on something as basic as when to honor the mothers who give us life. How on earth can we possibly agree on anything else?

First, it was the League of Nations, in 1920 and then the United Nations, in 1945. These were international organisations created to keep the peace. And since their founding, our world has been in a constant state of war and by all accounts, it’s only getting worse.

Of course, we can debate why that is, but I don’t believe global peace is possible as long as we strive toward what some call “one-worldism”. We must accept that different cultures, religion (don’t get me started) and our varying personal interests make it impossible for everyone to ‘get along’. Frankly, the best we can hope for is not to kill one another and there’s no guarantee of that.

But back to the subject. Today, in Washington, D.C., Leftist zealots will protest in front of the Supreme Court to demand that women (a term these idiots can’t even define) should have the right to murder their unborn children, up until the birth of the baby and in California, these diabolical misfits want to make it legal for a ‘mother’ the murder her child after birth.

The irony of all this abortion “rights” nonsense is that the leaked SCOTUS draft opinion reveals the court giving the “My Body My Choice” crowd what they say they want — a choice in the hands of the people, not the court.

But the problem is that some people won’t support the murder of unborn children and that’s what upsets these morons most. They want YOU to accept their lack of morals. They want you to celebrate their events. They want you to submit to them. Period.

Well, I don’t mark or celebrate non-Jewish events, anyway, because of an unambiguous instruction found in Vayikra (or Leviticus) 18:3, but if you do, give a thought today and thank G-D that your mother wasn’t a monster, polluted by the Liberal agenda, which is bent on the destruction of our society. Or not. It’s your choice. And I won’t protest outside your house if you don’t.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Following on from yesterday, the leaked draft SCOTUS opinion has been confirmed, though few people doubted its authenticity. Chief Justice John Roberts has promised an investigation, though I doubt anything will come of that effort. It’s not a crime to leak Supreme Court documents, though if it turns out that the culprit is a member of one of the Bar Associations, then, they’ll likely be disbarred, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. I still think that it’s not as it appears; I just don’t believe that one of the Lefties in the court leaked it…

To start with, they would know that none of the justices will be swayed by public opinion. And Democrats are insane, but they’re not suicidal. They’re not going to abandon the filibuster rules in the Senate no matter how many times they threaten to do so, or let’s face it, they would have done that already and forced Roe into law in every state, at some point during the last 50 years.

But here’s the point… Why do they want Abortion so bad? This draft opinion that looks set to overrule Roe and Casey, will not make abortion illegal. It won’t even reduce the number of abortions in America... On the contrary, it will probably increase them. I would expect abortion zealots to intentionally get pregnant just so they can have an abortion and record the procedure for their Instagram posts, so what’s all this about?

Overruling Roe and Casey will make abortion a States’ Rights issue, which it is and always should have been and that means that if the voters in a state want to allow abortions, then, they can have their representatives pass laws to protect their ‘right’ to murder unborn children. In other states, where the voters wish to preserve the sanctity of life, they will enact laws that do just that. But this enrages Democrats. Why? Abortion. Why do they want it so bad?

It's not about “My Body”, “My Choice” as they claim. We’ve just gone through more than two years of these insane people telling us to wear masks, inject ourselves with experimental drugs and distance ourselves from loved ones and everyone else. It’s not about ‘their choice’.

I think it comes down to this... It’s about ‘our choice’. Democrats hate themselves. They are NEVER truly happy… and as we know, misery loves company. That said, they are most happy, their self-loathing is at its lowest ebb when they are forcing other people when they are controlling other people, demanding from other people, to submit, to accept their lack of morals, and for those people to deny their values in the service of the Democrats’ evil, deviant behaviour.

It isn’t enough for the demonic malcontents to destroy their own communities like they have done in every Democrat-run city in America. They want to destroy your community. America has 50 states. It’s a big country, really it’s like 50 countries, without borders and so if you want to murder children, you can go live in New York, or California, or one of the other states where Democrats fester. And isn’t that a great system? The problem is, it’s not enough for them. They want you to murder your children, to pay for it all, and to accept, no, they want you to champion their miserable lives.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

And just like that, the war in Ukraine has slipped into the ether.

Dobbs -v- Jackson Women's Health Organization, or Dobbs, is a case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court that deals with the constitutionality of a 2018 Mississippi state law that banned abortion operations after the first 15 weeks of pregnancy.

So, the lower courts had ruled in preliminary injunctions to prevent enforcement of the law on the basis that the law violated the holding of women's rights in Planned Parenthood -v- Casey, or Casey as it is referred to, a decision which generally allows a woman to opt for an abortion within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy.

Oral arguments were held in December 2021 and a decision was expected by the end of the 2021–22 term, which ends October 2nd this year, but yesterday, POLITICO obtained a leaked Supreme Court draft majority opinion, and that draft suggests that the Supreme Court is prepared to overturn both Roe and Casey.

According to this draft opinion, Justice Alito is said to have written: “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start”. Alito continued “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.” Well, you’ll get no argument from me there…

And POLITICO wrote that four of the other justices — Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett — joined the draft opinion with Alito while Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan will be writing dissents. It is unclear how Chief Justice John Roberts will vote or if he has already joined a written opinion.

A number of questions arise from this, not least of which is who leaked the draft opinion? From my Twitter feed, the knee-jerk reaction and majority appear to support the guess that the document was leaked by a Leftist clerk, who naturally leaked it to POLITICO, a known Lefty publication. But I'm not so sure about that...

Supporters of the trending Twitter opinion say that the draft was leaked to pressure the justices and to provoke the Leftist Mob to riot, as they do so often, hoping to force the justices to change their opinion. That plan seems too easy and quite unlikely. Supreme Court Justices are unlikely to submit to Mob Rule.

However, knowing how the Left would react, I believe a Conservative, either one of the Justices or a clerk working there, released the draft opinion now, rather than a month before the midterm elections. That makes much more sense to me; I am of the view that we should get the riots over with now so that they can’t be used by the Biden Administration to institute sweeping changes to the voting process like was done by Democrats in 2020.

And if I was going to leak that document, I would have sent it to a Leftist publication, but that's just me. Frankly, the document would have been spiked by many of the Conservative publications as being too sacred to be published before its time and even if it had been published, the Leftists would have immediately denied its authenticity if, for example, FoxNews had run with the story. So, I don’t doubt the authenticity of the draft opinion, but I do question the method of its leaking.

Of course, I could be wrong. The Democrats’ lust for murder is strong, so maybe some lowly clerk for Sotomayor or perhaps Sotomayor herself was so crazed by the draft opinion that they couldn’t wait to release it. Well, we’ll probably never know who leaked it. Time will tell whether this draft opinion survives. Please G-D I hope that it does.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Twitter is abuzz with the comments of Russia’s foreign minister.

Sergey Lavrov was speaking about the West’s persistent refusal to acknowledge that there is a growing presence of Nazis (Neo or otherwise) in Ukraine, when he foolishly threw out a comment about Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who is, after all, the West’s poster child for everything good and pure…

Lavrov said that Hitler had some Jewish blood in him…

In case you haven’t been following the story of Russia’s war in Ukraine, one of Vladimir Putin’s goals, he says, was to “denazify” its government. Whether you believe that or not is something for you to decide, but the post-2014 Ukrainian government’s problematic relationship with extreme right-wing parties and neo-Nazi groups is something the West is trying to sweep under the rug.

Naturally, for Lavrov to suggest that Hitler had (some) Jewish blood sparked immediate outrage in Israel and around the world but this firestorm has been compounded by those most-outraged when they exaggerated what was said and then twisted his stupid comment to say that what Lavrov really meant was… to blame Jews for the Holocaust.

No, he wasn’t blaming us Jews for the Holocaust. He was pointing out that being Jewish doesn’t immunize someone from being an anti-Semite. Truth be told, we’ve got a lot of Jews who hate Jews and who hate Israel, among our rank and file.

The fact is that it's quite likely that everyone on the planet has some Jewish blood in them, but that doesn’t make them Jewish. News flash, Hitler wasn’t Jewish because his mother wasn’t Jewish. Just like Zelenskyy’s two children are not Jewish. Neither fact means that Ukraine does not have a problem with Nazis.

Lavrov was pointing out the utter hypocrisy of those who rabbit on about Zelenskyy being Jewish, saying that because he’s Jewish, Ukraine couldn’t possibly have a serious problem with its association with Nazis, which it does.

And as a matter of historical fact, until the fall of the Soviet Union, it was believed that about 900,000 Jews were murdered as part of the Holocaust in Ukraine. However, with access to Soviet archives that number increased to 1.2 million Jews murdered, and a more recent estimate brings the number up to over 1.6 million Jews murdered in Ukraine, with more than 100,000 Ukrainians having joined with police units that provided key assistance to the Nazis.

Despite Zelenskyy’s presidency and some say because of him, Neo-Nazi and extreme nationalist groups linked to the Azov Battalion have maintained growing power in Ukraine and in local politics, in the Nationalist heartland, located in the west of the country.

The fact is that after Zelenskyy’s election win in 2019, he conceded to the extreme right who had threatened him with removal from office, or even death if he negotiated with the separatist leaders from Donbas, whom he conveniently dismissed as terrorists.

So don’t talk to me about Zelenskyy being Jewish or his virtue as a protector of ‘his people’. He’s a charlatan, an actor playing a role, using his acting and social media skills to advance his agenda, which now includes guilting NATO into war with Russia.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

You really have to admire the Obama-Biden Administration. These liars have spent the last five years telling Americans any everyone else who would listen, one bogus story after another. And while not the actual genesis of their disinformation campaign, as far as most people were aware, the big push began as President Trump came down the escalator.

Since then, we’ve been fed one false narrative after another, and corporate media has run with those lies, describing them as fact, even when there was no evidence to support them or when all the available evidence refuted the Left’s narrative. It is really quite extraordinary. You have to admire their chutzpah.

Well, a few days ago, we learned that the Biden Administration had created a ‘Disinformation Governance Board’ led by a high profile proponent of a number of their false stories.

Nina Jankowicz was appointed to be the Executive Director, of the Board, which is part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. But her appointment to head this division of the Agency is rather ironic because just a couple of years ago, on May 29th (2020), Jankowicz publicly stated that the Executive Branch of the government had no business policing information, an activity she described as “anti-Democratic”.

In 2017, she was a Fulbright fellow in Kyiv, working for Ukraine's foreign ministry. Jankowicz has also worked as a disinformation fellow at the Wilson Center, which is a quasi-government entity and think tank, named for the Democrat President who displayed open contempt for the U.S. Constitution, and Jankowicz was the Center’s Russia and Belarus program supervisor.

But now as a member of the Executive Branch, Jankowicz has been granted (I say an un-Constitutional authority) to continue to show disdain for women, minorities and anyone else who deviates from Wilson's view of the "perfect citizen", but on a larger scale now and with the full force of the U.S. Government behind her.

But “disinformation” is a really a misnomer. Information, whether it is true or false, intentional or otherwise, is still information. And you can compare this to 'false information'. The prefix “dis” indicates the opposite of the word that it precedes, and so in this case, Leftists are using a made-up word that is inaccurate at best. False information is not disinformation.

This is nothing new for Democrats, who are actively re-writing our language to confuse voters into unwittingly supporting their failed policies. Men are women. Women are men. Vaccines should no longer be expected to prevent infection or transmission and inflation is good, to name only a few. Under Democrat control, language is subject to change and it does change, on a daily basis, to conceal their failures.

I could go on for an hour or more listing all the false narratives and bogus stories promoted by Democrats over the last five years, not to mention the actual true stories that these Communists have censored or buried, with the help of Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, among the many news outlets, newspapers and bogus “Fact Checkers”, but it wouldn’t make any difference now.

As we know, the damage is already done and that is precisely the problem. Democrats know that it doesn’t matter whether or not their lies are exposed. They don’t care if they’re found out. They know that most people don’t have the time or inclination to look for the truth and even if they did, social media platforms and Google search use algorithms to keep the shell game going, distracting the public, while they advance their narrative.

Continue Reading: https://www.wirenews.org/post/midday-rant-disinformation-information-governance-board

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

This should come as no surprise… Joe Biden is now considering a plan to wipe out a substantial amount of student debt, for the 43 million borrowers, who collectively owe more than $1.6 trillion, money they received from the taxpayers to fund their education.

Obviously, this is a thinly veiled plan by the Democrats to buy votes, leading up to November as we near the midterm election, which, according to most of the polls, is expected to be devastating for the Biden Administration.

And there will be very few students, in debt, who would object to having that debit forgiven, so my opinion will not be a very popular one, but it must be said.

Previously, and I won't say during his campaign because he didn't actually campaign, but from the basement, Biden had indicated his support to cancel up to $10,000 of debt per student. Since then, he has not followed through with that plan.

But during a meeting on Monday with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, he suggested that he will now ‘forgive’ far more than that amount (as though it’s his money) and some Democrats have called on him to use his Executive Order authority to cancel $50,000 per student or more.

This is so typical of Leftists, who after all, rarely accept responsibility, regularly look to blame others for their actions, and always want someone else to pay… for them.

At present, interest payments on those student debts are suspended, which amount to around $5 billion per month, the payments were halted because of COVID19 and they’re not expected to restart until at least September this year, if at all.

That said, this debt and the interest payments are carried on the country's balance sheet, as it were, so the proposal to cancel $1 trillion or more in assets and $60 billion in annual interest payments will need to be made up, somehow and more than likely means more borrowing for the country. And that means that taxpayers will pay again, first when the money was borrowed and now again when the debt is forgiven.

By the way, it is possible to file for bankruptcy and for a student loan to be discharged. All that one must do is to demonstrate to the bankruptcy court that repaying the loan would cause undue hardship. Nearly every student says that repayment is a hardship, so I wonder why they don't simply file for bankruptcy. Of course, the answer is that they want something for nothing and most of these ‘graduates’ are too stupid to understand that it’s taxpayer’s money they received, not the government’s money.

And last month, the U.S. Department of Education asked the U.S. Department of Justice to request a pause of any active bankruptcy case if the borrower wishes, so as you can see, Biden's Administration is pulling out all of the stops to garner votes.

In my humble opinion, borrowing money for college or university, graduating, and then asking for the debt to be cancelled is a lot like going to a fancy restaurant, enjoying a really nice meal, and then asking for the bill to be forgiven… because you didn't have a plan going in, how you would pay.

But I'll tell you what, here’s my offer… I will support cancelling the student debt for any graduate who will surrender their diploma. You can't say fairer than that.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

I’m old enough to remember when a man NEVER hit a woman. EVER. When I was growing up my father would tell me over and over again that ‘there was no reason, ever to hit a girl’ and he did this all the while knowing that there were and would be dozens of reasons, but that you just NEVER did, ever.

Comedian Bill Burr said it best when he reminded us that ‘there is no reason to hit a woman’, despite being able to give us ‘like 17 right off the top of his head’ because ‘there are plenty of reasons to hit a woman, you just don’t do it’.

So, I was surprised to hear Leftists, who until quite recently used to defend woman’s rights, what with the Me-Too. Movement, glass ceilings in the workplace and not very long ago, a woman’s right to vote, but today, Leftists are supporting a guy’s right to slap a woman who called him a name.

Now, I’ve left out most of the facts because remember, I was always taught that there’s no reason to hit a woman, but for anyone who needs to know if she deserved it, let me fill in some of the colours.

A few days ago, in front of an auditorium full of students at Locust Grove High School in Henry County Georgia, in the United States (where else?) this guy hauled off and slapped a woman and the event was captured on film so there’s no disputing what happened. The woman was white, which is the most important part of the story, and the guy was, you guessed it, black.

The girl had called him a name. She had uttered that word that only black people can use and they use it all the time. This word is so dangerous to the ears of black people that it must be referred to by a single letter; an “N” and cannot be uttered by anyone, unless they’re black. When this black male student heard the offending word and checked to see that the girl wasn’t black, he apparently suffered an injury so grievous that he was forced to ‘defend’ himself and so he marched toward the girl, who was a distance from him when the verbal ‘assault’ took place and he struck her across the face.

Okay, so fast forward and school officials naturally (but it would appear they acted in error, by all accounts) well, they excluded ‘the victim’, the black man from class while they permitted ‘the attacker’, the white girl to attend classes and this outraged many students and others and this outrage caused a school walk-out, with many people saying that punishment for the male, who actually struct the woman and no punishment for the woman, who had after all called the male a name which may not be uttered by a white person and so this behaviour was simply unacceptable.

I ask you since when is free speech permitted? Since when has it been the case that a man can’t slap a woman if he hears her use harsh words or worse, the dreaded “N” word? I mean, it’s only right, right? I guess today, it’s okay for a man to strike a woman.

Well, thank G-D for that.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Well, it’s official. He did it. Elon Musk’s offer of $54.20 per share for Twitter, Inc., has been accepted by that company’s board of directors and will now be placed before shareholders for a vote, which means Elon has bought Twitter. Unless Leftists are able to secure another, better, offer from someone who might be more palatable to their sensibilities, this is a done deal.

This should be GREAT NEWS! And it is good news. Honestly, you can measure the merit of a thing by how much the other side hates it and the Left well and truly hates this news. So, that’s fantastic! But for me, something lingers…

To tell you the truth, I like Elon Musk, so I am not worried at all when I consider his plans for the company or at least those that we know about. He has repeated his desire to ‘unlock’ Twitter’s potential in terms of free speech and he has also confirmed that regular mortals will be verified (which means there will be some future financial cost to using Twitter) and that’s okay, too. That means that we’ll go from being the product to being the customer (at least on Twitter) and that’s gotta be a good thing.

But I still have this feeling that we’re missing something. I guess it’s worth noting that in a single act Elon Musk wiped out all of Twitter’s competitors, or at least he disrupted their unique selling point (free speech) and I suspect that once the transfer of power has happened, a lot of users who were previously suspended from Twitter or felt censored by the previous management, will return from Gettr, Parler, Gab, Rumble, etc. and so these companies may not welcome the news as much as you might think.

Almost immediately, the White House announced that it will look to change Section 230 of the Telecommunications Act. Section 230 provides that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider", which is a long way to say that Twitter cannot be sued for anything that I might Tweet. The clock is ticking, and they’ve got until November to act, so watch this space.

Basically, the White House is saying that the Biden Administration is looking for ways to make it possible for Twitter to be sued, to waste its money, which might worry some people, but Elon Musk has been in court before and prevailed, so I don’t think he’s too worried about this thinly veiled threat. I don’t think he cares about money, which is why he’s got so much of it. Ironically, a week ago it was the Right threatening to do the same thing to Twitter and Leftists were screaming about Twitter being a private company that could do whatever it wanted. Oh, what a difference a week makes.

But I digress… This feeling I have lingers. And it’s the idea that our collective free speech is dependent upon one man, who has made it clear that he’s going to Mars. And even if he doesn’t leave the planet, how long can we depend upon his influence. Not to put too fine a point on it, Elon won’t live forever…

Remember, our rights are supposed to be protected by the Bill of Rights (in America) and to a lesser extent by example elsewhere around the globe, NOT safeguarded by Elon Musk! Our leaders are elected to protect those rights and to defend them as our representatives, when in truth, they ARE the people who deny us our G-D-given Rights and lie to us, while they live off the tax money, taken from us, under the threat of prosecution.

So, truth be told we cannot depend on our leaders and at this point in history we must surely fear them. Corporate media and government are one and the enemy of the people. Twitter now stands alone as a bastion of free speech and one man stands guard.

Today, our speech has been saved because of one man and that worries me greatly.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

This would be funny if it wasn’t so sad… but former Vice President Joe Biden has announced that he intends to run for ‘reelection’, as President in 2024.

And his campaign has already picked up support from Native Americans after Tribe Leader, U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Sunday said she’d be supporting him.

You may recall that Chieftain Warren ran against Biden in a very crowded Democrat presidential primary in 2020 but ended up endorsing him after she dropped out of the race.

Putting aside Biden’s age, at 78, Biden was the oldest pResident of the White House ever inaugurated and if Democrats were able to repeat the mail-in ballot fiasco that we experienced in 2020, he would be 82 at the start of his second term.

Forget his age for a minute. The truth is that by all accounts Biden is the worst White House occupant we’ve ever had. He’s not ineffective. There are many who would welcome the return of a feckless Jimmy Carter to the White House. No, Biden is extremely effective at what seems to be the planned destruction of America.

But before I go too far into this Rant, I have a question. Who would be willing to throw their name into the hat and run for VP on Biden’s Ticket? Kamala Harris? Even she knows she’s finished. Harris has always been in over her head. She’s completely useless and everyone knows it. So, I doubt the Democrat political machine would invite her, even if she remained delusional enough to accept.

SO, who? Which Democrat would have the guts to face President Trump or even Florida Governor Ron DeSantis in a race that would naturally center on debating the performance of the Biden Administration? We’re only fourteen months into an Administration that has seen record inflation, record gas and energy prices, an open-door policy at the Southern Border, and runaway crime numbers that are beginning to make Sudan appear like a really nice vacation spot?

And then there’s the obvious questions over Biden’s mental condition. Clearly, he’s suffering from dementia. Anyone who suggests otherwise should be charged with elder abuse. I could go on for 20 minutes listing all of the incidents that have been recorded and his handlers will be aware of those that happened when the cameras were off…

So, obviously, he’s not fit for office, but then, we knew that during the 2020 campaign while he hid in his basement and called a lid on events each and every day for what they described as a ‘campaign’. It was never a campaign. It was a prelude to a rigged election that was decided by the Democrat Party in six States.

Anyone who considers becoming Biden’s running mate must answer this question: How do you campaign blaming everything that’s wrong with the country on the person at the top of your ticket? Perhaps you could let it be known that if you’re elected, you’ll trigger the Twenty-fifth Amendment and ‘get Biden out of Office’ immediately after the Inauguration, but otherwise, it’s an impossible proposition. The American public are already fed up with Biden and this is proven by his Poll numbers. So, ask yourself, who would commit the political suicide needed to support Biden?

Of course, President Trump welcomes the opportunity to run against Biden again, but my worry is that the FakeNews media will paint it as an attack against a weak and feeble man, elder abuse as I mentioned already, they’ll make Biden appear the victim and I fear he’ll capture the sympathy vote. When you add that to the baked-in Democrat election fraud, and G-D forbid, we’ll see a repeat of 2020.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

This is a quick follow-up to my rant of a couple of episodes ago entitled “No More Masks on Planes”. As expected, the CDC has requested the U.S. Department of Justice to appeal US District Judge Kathryn Mizelle's ruling that it had acted unlawfully, and also as expected, Leftists and their apologists are doing their best to misrepresent and confuse that decision.

Yesterday, Dr Anthony Fauci was speaking to Neil Cavuto on Fox News and he shouldn’t be… he should be in jail, but there he was on Fox News and speaking about the judge’s ruling when he said "This is a CDC issue. It should not be a court issue."

Fauci continued “This is a public health decision and I think it’s a bad precedent when decisions about public health issues are made by people, be they judges or what have you that don’t have experience or expertise in public health, and I believe that this should remain a CDC decision…”

But the court hasn’t made any public health decision. The court said that the CDC violated the law when it mandated masks on public transportation because it failed to follow the established rules. Judge Mizelle made no comment about the effectiveness of masks one way or the other.

In her 59-page ruling which struck down the Federal mask mandate for airplanes and other modes of public transportation, Judge Mizelle wrote that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had exceeded its authority and failed to follow proper rulemaking procedures.

Nothing in the judge’s decision prevents the zealots from wearing masks, but Cavuto is the least credible and least effective news anchor on any network, so Fauci was given free reign to promote his dictatorial message, which also included numerous pushes for vaccination and at one point he seemed to say that forced lockdowns should be used to vaccinate the population.

Cavuto has been described as a Trump Skeptic, but is really an ardent anti-Trumper, and ironically, a vaccine cheerleader, who despite being vaccinated, got COVID19, and then as these cheerleaders so often do, he made the leap to credit his survival… to the vaccine that failed to protect him in the first place, but Cavuto and his ilk are our modern-day Nero, playing the fiddle while Rome burns, so little attention should be paid to what they say.

On the other hand, tyrants like Fauci are desperately clinging to the power they seized during the exaggerated pandemic. They recognise that public opinion is against their dictatorial policies, and they know that when the Left loses control of the U.S. House of Representatives in November, their remaining authoritarian control will dissolve.

These Communists are searching for something, anything that will make it possible for them to retain power. And at this stage, the only thing that could save the Democrats is another pandemic or some other manufactured crisis through which they could make the case for mail-in ballots as they did in 2020.

Fauci wants unfettered control over your health. He doesn’t want the courts to be able to stop him, the NIH, or the CDC from telling you what to do. Would you give Fauci unchecked control over you or your family’s health with no recourse to prevent their mandates? Do you trust him? I don’t trust Dr Fauci or any of his ilk. And you shouldn’t either.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

* Belarusians too

Honestly, I wonder how far the ‘tolerant’ among us will take this nonsense… On Wednesday we learned that the ‘All England Club’ and the ‘Committee of Management of The Championships’, who operate Wimbledon, will refuse entries from Russian and Belarusian players to The Championships 2022 at Wimbledon.

Ian Hewitt, who is Chairman of the All England Club, in making the announcement spoke of "universal condemnation" of Russia's actions, which he described as "illegal". I would suggest that “universal” is perhaps a tad bit overstated. And like most of his ilk, Hewitt appears to have forgotten that two wrongs don’t make a right.

For the record, discrimination on the basis of nationality is illegal, even in the United Kingdom. The only reason why these players are being refused entry to this event is that they are Russian and Belarusian. That's unlawful discrimination. This may come as a surprise to Hewitt, but under the Equality Act 2010, it is illegal for anyone to be discriminated against in the workplace due to their race or nationality.

Before ascending to the lofty post of Chairman of the All England Club, Hewitt was a partner for over 25 years with Freshfields, an international law firm, so you would think that he would know discrimination when he commits it, I mean, sees it, but I guess he thinks he can get away with breaking the law because all such acts of discrimination and the theft of people's property is all the rage today.

All that’s needed to deny someone their rights, since the end of February this year, is that they may or may not have had a passing association with Vladimir Putin. But in this case, these athletes are being unlawfully discriminated against merely because they carry the wrong passport.

Ian Hewitt and each of the Committee Members who voted for this unlawful discrimination should be ashamed of themselves. I am calling on everyone to ignore the All England Club and its upcoming event scheduled in June. I also call on all other tennis players to withdraw from the event but if they do not, then, by their actions they support the unlawful discrimination being perpetrated upon the Russian and Belarusian players. I say, you may regret your acquiescence and lack of protest, when your passport falls out of favour, somewhere, anywhere, maybe here in the UK.

Shame on Ian Hewitt, shame on the Committee that runs Wimbledon. You’re all part of the Woke Mob and should be ignored.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Well, well, well. Here’s a bit of good news… On Monday, the 18th of April, US District Judge Kathryn Mizelle, a Federal Court judge in the U.S. State of Florida, ruled that former Vice President Joe Biden's 'national mask mandate' had exceeded the authority of US Health Officials.

Many European countries have already cancelled these ridiculous mandates and in the UK, where I live, we have been able to claim an exemption from the start meaning that we could self-exempt and this could not be challenged by government officials or the Karens among us, AND so thank G-D I never have worn a mask, but people in the United States have not been so fortunate and as I am an American, this story caught my eye.

In her 59-page ruling, Judge Mizelle struck down the Federal mask mandate for airplanes and other modes of public transportation, writing that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the CDC, had exceeded its authority and failed to follow proper rulemaking procedures.

But as expected, the Left immediately sprang into action attacking the judge, who was (shock horror!) appointed by President Trump in September 2020 and confirmed by the Senate later that year.

All of the normal attack dogs were immediately dispatched and are still out, criticizing the judge, for her age (she's 35 years old now but was just 33 when she was chosen by President Donald Trump for the lifetime judicial appointment, for her experience, anything and everything about the judge is fair game and these hounds are busy searching for something they can use against her... It’s textbook Leftist warfare.

The White House spokesperson, who is a pathological liar, indicated that if the CDC wishes, the Biden Administration will appeal the decision, so it's not over yet. In fact, while some airlines have reversed their policies on masks, saying instead that passengers can choose whether or not to wear them, others, such as the New York City Transit Authority will continue to enforce the illegal mandate.

The Talking Heads on CNN, MSNBC, NPR, and all the Leftist sources of government propaganda got the memo and then collectively spread their mantra that "masks save lives" with one of these sick individuals actually saying, "masks have saved millions of lives". Millions of lives? Really? These people are delusional.

They are the worst of our society. They are evil, power-hungry deviants, not satisfied unless they're telling you what to do, what to say and they would prefer if they could control your inner thoughts, which after all, their policies seek to do, by causing many people to self-censor on social media and elsewhere for fear of being cancelled by these Communists.

Well as I said, it’s not over yet, but should this ruling stand, if the CDC relents and decides not to appeal or if the decision is eventually upheld, I want to know who's going to jail. If I break the law, I get arrested. If a court finds that I broke the law, one that has negatively impacted the lives of hundreds of millions of people, infringing on their G-D given right, permanently damaged the ability of children to learn effectively, to interact socially with their peers and to communicate with others, I will go to jail. So, I want to know who's going to jail?

Continue reading https://www.wirenews.org/post/midday-rant-no-more-masks-on-planes

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Let’s start by me confirming that I am NOT trying to convince anyone of my religious belief, which for the avoidance of doubt is rooted firmly in Judaism. I am Jewish and I am not proselytising for our Team; primarily because Jews don’t proselytize. But if you find yourself rooting for another team, then, I am willing to bet that the founding documents that you claim to accept contain precisely what I am about to explain.

Okay, some background. Although I don’t like dividing Jews into different denominations because it’s been said that there are only Jews; just some are more observant than others, I am what you could describe as an Observant Jew, and by that I mean, I keep Shabbat (in other words, I don’t work from Friday evening for at least 25 hours, I eat only Kosher food and I rise each night after midnight and before dawn to pray and read from the Torah and The Zohar.

The Talmud notes that the Torah contains 613 Mitzvot or Commandments. The word mitzvah comes from the root word le-tZaVet (לצוות), which means “to join.” This teaches us that the performance of mitzvot is the means by which we can “join” and attach ourselves to G-D in order to experience the Divine.

There are 248 positive commandments (things we must do), and 365 prohibitive commandments (things we must not do). Briefly, and I do mean briefly, an overview of the topics covered in no specific order include G-D, Torah, Signs and Symbols, Prayer and Blessings, Love and Brotherhood, the Poor and Unfortunate among us, the Treatment of non-Jews, Marriage, Divorce, and Family,

Forbidden Sexual Relations, Times and Seasons (relating to Agriculture), Dietary Laws, Business Practices, Employees and Servants, Vows, Oaths and Swearing (for legal purposes), the Sabbatical and Jubilee Years (again, relating to Agriculture), the Court and Judicial Procedure, Injuries and Damages, Property and Property Rights, Criminal Laws, Publishment and Restitution, Prophecy, Idolatry, the Treatment of Animals, Clothing, the Firstborn, the Kohanim (or Priests) and the Levites (who have political and educational responsibilities within the Community),

Tithing (Tzedakah or Charity) and Taxes, The Temple, Sanctuary and Sacred Objects, Offerings, Purity and Impurity, the King, Nazarites (those who dedicate themselves for a period of time to intense religious devotion and finally my list concludes with the subject of War. Of course, some of these mitzvot are currently redundant because they relate only to the Temple, in Israel, and because the first two Temples were destroyed, we’re left with a list that will still fill even the longest of days.

And each of these requires an in-depth discussion of their own, but I wanted you to get an idea of the comprehensiveness of the list because many people will think of the “ten Commandments” and stop there. These mitzvot cover all areas in life, providing a sort of “cradle to grave” management for living.

But today, I wanted to focus on just two Negative Commandments: Numbers 39 and 40. Both are found within a single verse in Devarim, or you might know it as Deuteronomy; verse 22:5, which says “A woman must not put on man’s apparel, nor shall a man wear woman’s clothing; for whoever does these things is abhorrent to your G-D.”

Now, I am NOT a biologist, but I would say that’s a reasonably unambiguous statement. Whether you’re Jewish or not, if you believe in G-D, you must take those words to heart and recognise that G-D had a very good reason to include them.

Continue Reading https://www.wirenews.org/post/midday-rant-men-and-women-are-different

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

In case you’re wondering, I’m Jewish. Being Jewish and living among the Diaspora, or outside Israel, has a limited number of benefits and a great many challenges. For starters, depending on where you are there may not be a Synagogue nearby.

And in truth, there needs to be at least two synagogues: the one you go to and the one you couldn’t ever possibly go to… In my case, that’s not an issue.

But then, there is a scarcity of Kosher food and that means there’s an added cost for shipping food that is suitable to eat. And then, there’s the constant in-your-face idolatry. I’m afraid to say that now, this even extends into Israel. It’s everywhere.

In fact, the Talmud tells us that idolatry was chief among the reasons that Solomon’s Temple, or the First Temple was destroyed in 422 BCE, before the Common Era. The others being immorality and bloodshed.

At a fundamental level, Idolatry is focusing on anything that diverts our attention from HaShem. Whether that’s the self, personal gratification; for example, seeking the attention or accolades of others for the good we might do, or the unhealthy quest for money or material gain, belief in false gods or the practicing of rituals or faith systems that are antithetical to the Torah.

But not only the practicing, studying or thinking about these other ‘faiths’ or ‘religions’ in a way that either leads to or could lead one to a loss of trust in HaShem. These are all forms of idolatry. But there are many others.

With the blatant commercialisation of these other ‘faith systems’, it’s often very difficult to avoid their message, which of course, is the intent. We have recently experienced an event practiced by the billion or so followers of HeyZeus, that began last Friday and ended yesterday with nearly every shop or business decreeing support for the myth.

I say nearly every shop because even some Jewish-owned businesses have begun the practice of ‘celebrating’ this myth in hopes of attracting more business or out of a misguided sense of inclusion or perhaps simply because they have forgotten what it is to be Jewish. Even the Israel Defense Forces or IDF mark every non-Jewish event with online greetings in what is obviously a PR stunt or worse, appeasement… you decide.

And I say myth because there is no evidence to support the claim by the supporters of this event. It’s a myth founded on a tale that is supported by the suggestion the absence of evidence is the evidence.

But on closer inspection, the written basis of this ‘faith system’, warned against the very concept of what followed. In brief I’ll offer just three places in the Tanakh, the Five Books of Moses, or some might call it the Old Testament, where these warnings are given.

Of course, you’ll find them in any Siddur word for word without variation whatsoever, but I’ll add the links into the description below so you can check my source. I would also suggest that you can use any of the 21,000 versions of the complete ‘revealed’ message of HeyZeus where you’ll find them.

Devarim 4:2, or you may call it the Book of Deuteronomy, says: “You shall not add anything to what I command you or take anything away from it, but keep the Commandments of your G-D that I enjoin upon you.”

Moving down a bit in Devarim to 13:1 it says, “Be careful to observe only that which I enjoin upon you: neither add to it nor take away from it.”

And then there’s Yehoshua, or Joshua 1:7, which says “But you must be very strong and resolute to observe faithfully all the Teaching that My servant Moses enjoined upon you. Do not deviate from it to the right or to the left, that you may be successful wherever you go.”

Continue Reading https://www.wirenews.org/post/midday-rant-idolatry

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Mars, the fourth planet from the Sun and the second-smallest planet in our Solar System, which is larger than only Mercury, could be close to earth, someday, a mere 33.9 million miles from earth but this has not yet happened in recorded history according to NASA. Usually, the "Red Planet" is 140 million miles from earth. To put that into perspective, that's 70 million times the distance from my house to the local grocery store, so in other words, it’s a long way.

Full disclosure, I'm a great Elon Musk fan. I follow him on Twitter and while he doesn't follow me back @realBillWhite, I won't hold that oversight against him... He's a busy guy. Elon is a true inspiration to millions of people around the world. After co-founding PayPal, he invested his share of the money from the sale of that business to become the first African American to simultaneously run Tesla, the world's greatest electric car company and SpaceX, which in just 20 years has become the world's leading provider of space transportation and communications services.

And truthfully, I'll admit to tears of joy when I watched those first two rockets return to earth and land perfectly on their designated X, which almost compares to the growing pride I feel for a racially integrated America with each returning rocket, returning to a country where an African American, like Elon, can achieve such greatness, not only for his people but for everyone.

Now, it, it may seem like only yesterday that Elon was a thing, in truth, his success has been many years in the making. In 2001, Elon conceptualised Mars Oasis, a project to land a miniature experimental greenhouse in which plants could be grown on Mars, the goal to revive public interest in space exploration. By 2007, Elon stated one of his personal goals was to eventually enable human exploration and settlement of Mars. But Why Mars? Why not another, closer planet?

Well for starters, Mercury is insanely hot on the sunlit side, frozen solid on the cold side, has zero atmosphere, and a TON of nasty solar radiation, so that's a Big No.

Venus has so much atmospheric pressure that it would crush any spacesuit (or any spacecraft for that matter) like stomping down on a Coke can. It also rains acid AND very little sunlight makes it to the surface meaning Tesla’s Solar Roof wouldn’t work there. Another obvious No.

Jupiter and Saturn have no solid surface, produce vast amounts of nasty radiation, and have too much gravity. So, No and No.

Uranus, Neptune, Pluto and Sedna are all too cold, too dark, not enough sunlight so, again, no Tesla Solar Roof, and not sufficiently explored to know what other problems there might be, AND so these are automatically excluded and since we're talking about planets, then our own Moon, which by comparison is very close indeed, is out from the get-go.

So, none of these planets would work, leaving Mars as the only possible location for a future human colony. On the plus side, Mars has a third the gravity of earth, so dieting will be a thing of the past there and it is believed there exists a lot of ice under the surface so water may not be ‘the issue’, as originally thought. But I still wondered, Elon, why Mars? Why not the Moon, if you want to establish a human colony? It's a Hell of lot closer.

Well, this week I got my answer. This week Elon offered to buy Twitter. In a document filed with the SEC, Elon agreed to pay $54.20 for each Twitter share that he does not already own. For the owners of Twitter stock, it's a great and profitable deal.

....

Continue reading https://www.wirenews.org/post/midday-rant-elon-why-mars

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

In the interests of full disclosure, I should confirm that I am a Conservative, with a capital C, but that I didn’t vote for Boris Johnson. BoJo isn’t a Conservative, and so I voted LibDem in the last election. Yes, it was a wasted vote. I get it. But that said, if Boris Johnson is the Conservative Party’s candidate in the next General Election, the LibDems will be getting my vote again. I don’t like Boris Johnson. He’s a liar. A morally bankrupt charlatan, who should never have been selected Leader of the party.

That said, today, Boris Johnson’s government has announced its plan to deter irregular migration by transferring thousands of would-be immigrants to Rwanda. More than 28,526 people, mostly young men, arrived in the UK via small boats in 2021, a peacetime record number for people wanting to make Great Britain their home. To counter that influx of migrants, the plan will see men who cross the Channel in small boats being sent to Rwanda where their asylum applications will be processed.

It's not very often that I approve with what Boris Johnson does, in fact, I rarely agree with him, but I completely support this plan and I am very pleased to read that Rwanda has confirmed it has agreed to host UK asylum seekers. Rwanda will receive an “upfront investment” of £120 million under the deal, which would “fund opportunities for Rwandans and migrants”, including secondary qualifications, vocational and skills training, language lessons, and higher education.

Of course, I’m sure you’ll be shocked to learn that ‘Opposition Leaders’, ‘Liberal Charities’ and most of the ‘Corporate (Leftist) Media’ are against the plan. For example, in hopes of rallying the public against the idea, Matt Dathan, Home Affairs Editor for The Times wrote: “The cost will be funded by the British taxpayer and is likely to reach thousands of pounds per person.” What a ridiculous statement for someone at The Times to make... Matt, name one thing that the government does that isn’t funded by the taxpayer. As I have said many times, the government has no money. It’s our money. The taxpayers are paying for everything.

Bravo Boris… Even a broken clock is right twice a day. I like this plan. I like it very much. And if I were Home Secretary, I would make similar agreements with every country from where asylum seekers originate and upon arrival in the UK, I would return them to their home countries, where their applications would be processed.

I guarantee that my plan would greatly reduce the number of applications.

View Details

I’m shocked. Shocked I tell you. Surely, no one will have seen this one coming… Prime Minister Boris Johnson, his wife Carrie, and Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, have been given fixed penalty notices or fines by the Metropolitan Police for breaking COVID19 restrictions that BoJo’s own government had imposed on the filthy masses.

This comes as the Metropolitan Police announced 30 additional fines yesterday in relation to Operation Hillman, which is looking into breaches of COVID regulations by Government officials. Police have now handed out over 50 fixed penalty notices in their “Partygate” probe.

But first a little history… After a press conference video was leaked, on 8 December 2021 Boris Johnson announced a Cabinet Office inquiry would be undertaken by the Cabinet Secretary Simon Case, to investigate whether COVID19 restrictions were broken at that or any other staff events. Case stepped back from the inquiry on 17 December, amid reports that his own office had also held a party in December 2020, and responsibility for the inquiry was handed to Sue Grey. During this period, Boris Johnson repeatedly denied that any rules were broken.

In January 2022, the Metropolitan Police opened its own investigation into potential breaches of COVID19 regulations in government buildings, leading to uncertainty over the timing and possible content of Gray's report.

An update on Gray's investigation was published at the end of January, which found some behaviour related to the gatherings "difficult to justify", and the report said that the gatherings representing a failure of leadership and to uphold standards expected of the government and public. Her report also stated that "excessive consumption of alcohol is not appropriate in a professional workplace at any time".

As I mentioned, since last December, Prime Minister Boris Johnson categorically denied that any COVID19 rules had been broken by him or anyone at Number 10; saying quite clearly in the House of Commons and elsewhere that “No rules were broken”. He repeated this claim a number of times.

But the details of party after party, work gathering after boozy work gathering, not to forget the Prime Minister’s own birthday party were being dripped into public view by a disgruntled Number 10 special adviser, Dominic Cummings, who felt as many millions of people feel that the Prime Minister broke the rules and lied about it because he believes that these rules simply don’t apply to him. The Prime Minister knew then what we know now, that the rules and restrictions were simply unnecessary.

BoJo did what BoJo does, he ‘kicked the can’ down the road, refusing to comment further than to lie that “No rules were broken” because he knew that the investigation would eventually reveal his true involvement but that by then, rising energy costs, the war in Ukraine, the threat of nuclear war and just the passage of time would divert people’s attention from his lies.

This recent behaviour is merely a pattern of this Prime Minister’s entire life. He’s a serial liar and when caught, he denies the obvious, points a finger elsewhere, and keeps dancing, confident that a disheveled haircut, a jolly demeanour, and a quick whit will carry the day. And it seems to work, not least of which because a majority of the Ministers of Parliament are more concerned for their job than they are the integrity of their office.

In the end, the investigation was a waste of the taxpayer’s money, a stalling tactic used by BoJo… who refuses to go despite obvious breaches of the Ministerial Code. He refuses to resign even though anyone else with any degree of integrity would have resigned already but this Prime Minister is not concerned that his behaviour continues to erode the public’s trust in government. Boris Johnson doesn’t care about that... The rules are for you and me, they don’t apply to him.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

It’s hard to know who to listen to anymore and by that, I mean, who is telling the truth... Over the last two- and a-bit years, we have all become a little weary of the ‘experts’ and the ‘professionals’ each with their agenda causing many of us to wonder if objective truth even exists?

The current news cycle, which began around six weeks ago, is focused on the war in Ukraine, and under the guise of “propaganda”, Western nations have worked together to censor Russian television company, RT, which has been taken off-air and off-line in several markets. It would be hilarious, if it wasn’t such a serious subject.. the pot is literally calling the kettle black.

Just days after the media-driven government propaganda stopped trying to convince the population that all our freedoms should be restricted for the health and well-being of the Global Community, the corporate talking heads now want to persuade us to stand up for the freedoms of Ukraine.

In the United States, for example, the same Administration that operates an illegal open-door policy, allowing millions of people to cross into the country seeks to convince the citizens that the national borders of Ukraine MUST be respected at any cost and that even the threat of a world war is worth the risk. Any objective analysis of this would recognise the irony.

The full-on attack against everything Russian started almost immediately after the invasion of Ukraine, with some zealots pouring Russian vodka that they had purchased, into the street and quickly moved onto the seizure of the assets of a growing list of Russian billionaires, who may or may not have had a passing association with Vladimir Putin.

Now, we hear the media elite intimating that Russia ‘may have used’ chemical weapons in Ukraine and while very few presenters dare to ‘confirm’ such a ridiculous story, the stage has been set so you can expect that if Putin has not used chemical weapons (and he hasn’t), then, some other nation will, and Russia will get the blame.

Propaganda in one form or another has been going on throughout history, ever so slowly progressing to where we are today. Governments have always conducted some form of disinformation, usually during wartime, but previously, these activities would be focused outward, toward the enemy. Today, mass propaganda is targeted inward, with the government lying to its own people in order to achieve the agenda of the ruling class.

And as I mentioned back in March 2020, COVID19 could not have come at a more opportune time. The economies of many of the Western nations were in tatters. In the UK, Brexit would have shown itself to have been a grievous error without something larger rearing its head to take the blame. Then, just when people started to push back and it became obvious to our leaders that they could continue the charade no longer, almost as though it had been planned, Russia invaded Ukraine.

And so that is where we are today, with Russia being the current focus of the Western mass propaganda campaign. It’s anyone’s guess how this will end, but what is for certain is that a great many people will die and those who remain will be paying the financial costs of the elite’s agenda for generations.

I’ll leave you with one thought. The government is lying. All governments are lying. Question everything.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

It’s been more than six weeks, and the FakeNews media continues to work overtime to convince us that our hearts should ache and our wallets should bleed for the “atrocities” being reported in Ukraine. People, who until recently, have sported a vaccine, NHS or other front-line warrior framed social media profile image, have now switched to a Ukrainian flag or colours and their help is greatly appreciated.

That said, I can’t take any of these people seriously when they lament the deaths in Ukraine, and in particular, the death of children, but ignore the murders of hundreds of thousands of babies by abortion in our own country.

In 2020 more than 209,000 abortions were performed in England and Wales. 13,815 abortions were carried out in Scotland in the same year. By comparison, Northern Ireland had fewer than 200 abortions, but this number is set to increase sharply as a result of changes to the law in March 2020, and by some estimates, the number is expected to increase to more than 6,500 abortions per year. Currently, the UK slaughters 223,000 children each year.

To put that into perspective, across the pond, in the United States, the CDC, which we know is statistically challenged, reported nearly 620,000 abortions in 2018. The Guttmacher Institute says that number is more like 860,000 abortions… With that in mind, between the United States and Great Britain more than 1 million children are murdered each year. One million children, murdered. Per year.

Not satisfied with murdering hundreds of thousands of children in the womb, a California Assembly committee has passed a shocking Bill that supports infanticide or the killing of babies up to one year AFTER birth. According to a report by LiveAction, a U.S.-based pro-life organization founded by Lila Rose, the Bill includes wording that could legalise infanticide, allowing newborns to die during the perinatal period after birth.

Perinatal is the period of time from becoming pregnant, and up to a year after giving birth.

The California Assembly Judiciary Committee held a hearing on Assembly Bill 2223 last week on Tuesday, the 5th of April, which states: “Notwithstanding any other law, a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death.”

So, this Bill would prohibit the prosecution of any woman who acted or more importantly, failed to act to preserve the life of their child until after the child’s first birthday. Mothers who kill their babies through neglect, including starving them to death, during the perinatal period would be protected from prosecution.

Therefore, until the FakeNews media and social media warriors start talking about this subject, until people add images of murdered fetuses to their social media profiles until people demand that laws that support and I say, encourage the wholesale slaughter of more than a million children each year are abolished, don’t talk to me about Ukraine. I am not interested.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Here’s another non-story for you -- the UK Media is doing its level best to make anyone who will listen upset with Rishi Sunak. And while my comments have the effect of encouraging this nonsense, my take is to point the finger at the truly guilty, not the useful idiots among us.

First a little background… Sunak is a British politician, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, since 2020, who was previously the Chief Secretary to the Treasury.

As part of the month-long and growing assault on everything “Russian”, Sunak is now being condemned by many for his wife’s very small shareholding in Infosys, a global company based in India that was founded by her father, which has committed the unforgivable act of continuing to operate in Russia after the invasion of Ukraine.

Again, according to the media, InfoSys has links with Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin, but the evidence of this claim is statements made by the media after the invasion began.

The most recent uproar is that Akshata Murthy, who is an Indian citizen, has non-domiciled status, referred to by most as “non-dom”, meaning that she doesn’t have to pay income tax on income earned abroad despite living in the UK. This is in full compliance with UK tax laws.

In fact, the Constitution of India does not allow holding Indian citizenship and the citizenship of a foreign country simultaneously, I guess those people who are criticising Sunak would prefer that his wife either give up her Indian citizenship or pay tax in both countries.

I’d bet that this storm in a teacup originated from Number 10. From where I sit it looks like the handiwork of Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who is probably still sore over what some described as a lack of support from Sunak during Bojo’s recent Partygate troubles.

This kind of thing is so, so typical of the UK; a Nanny State, where the average person has nothing or next to nothing and exists week to week, supported by the taxpayers and is easily rallied against anyone else who has more than they do.

BoJo wants to make sure that Sunak is never Prime Minister, but I think it’ll take more than his wife paying all the tax she’s legally required to pay to unseat the Chancellor of the Exchequer…

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

A couple of segments ago, I promised a comment on the war in Ukraine.

The war in Ukraine is terrible. War is never good. And the deaths of civilians, if there are any in Ukraine at this stage are regrettable, but the Russian invasion of Ukraine was something the West could have and should have prevented. That said, today, I do not believe it’s our fight. I am against any involvement in the war. I don’t believe we should be supplying weapons; in my opinion, it’s splitting hairs to supply weapons and claim that NATO is not involved in the war and I also disagree with these ever-increasing sanctions that will cause more economic damage for the West than they will for Russia.

Despite what the corporate media is telling you, the war in Ukraine is not genocide. According to widely held beliefs, genocide is the intentional destruction of a people - usually defined as an ethnic, national, racial, or religious group - in whole or in part. With that said, based on that definition, EVERY war is genocide, even those perpetrated by the West.

But Putin did not invade Ukraine because they’re Ukrainian. He didn’t attack the country because of their race, the religion of its people, or anything like it. Vladimir Putin launched this war because the West has for thirty years continued to encroach past previously defined lines, which our leaders had agreed not to overstep. The continued expansion of NATO, toward Russia, is not the fault of Russia. For its part, Ukraine has courted the West and encouraged the atmosphere that it would join NATO or at least that it would like to join NATO, which is a red line for Russia.

According to their own statements, since the late 1990s relations between NATO and Ukraine have developed into one of the most substantial of NATO’s partnerships. If you’re looking for someone to blame for the war in Ukraine, look West, not East. Russia is naturally protecting its sovereignty, much like the United States did in the 60s when Russia parked itself 90 miles off the coast of America.

If Putin’s war is genocide, then our wars are genocide.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Here’s a mystery for you... More than 1,000 daffodils have been cut down or pulled up after they had been planted by the residents of Saint Blazey, a small English village of around 4,600 people midway down the Cornish coast.

The local town council has denied cutting down the flowers. In fact, Town clerk Gaynor Mamo said “if daffodils had been cut down” it was nothing to do with the local authority. IF? The flowers are laying dead on the ground where they once grew… Regardless, that’s her story and she’s sticking to it.

However, the council did confirm that it will not be replanting the bulbs “for health and safety reasons”. What? Health and safety reasons? Are daffodils now a dangerous breed… of flower?

The story gets worse, Dr Mark Evans, from the Southwest Health Protection Unit, has chimed in saying: “Daffodils are toxic and severe vomiting and diarrhoea can occur if eaten by mistake. “Although very unpleasant,” he continued, “most people will recover fully without treatment.” Apparently, if you intend to eat the flowers, you’re good to go.

The Southwest Health Protection Unit is charged with and I’m quoting now, "Ensuring the safety and quality of food, water, air, and the general environment. Preventing the transmission of communicable diseases. Managing outbreaks and the other incidents which threaten the public health." Well, we can now add to that list of important objects, protecting us all from dangerous flowers.

Are you asking yourself how did we get here? How is it that government employees feel they’re entitled to protect us from flowers? Let me tell you, this is what happens when you encourage the Nanny State. A myriad of bureaucrats, each one with just enough authority to satisfy their appetite for power and their need for control over others, combined with far too much money in their budgets, paid by taxpayers, who have somehow forgotten that they’re paying for the abuse the government wields.

Well, in this case, I am calling on EVERY resident of Saint Blazey to plant daffodils. Plant daffodils in your front garden, in your back garden, and fill planters if your estate is small… fill every available space. And for all the fact-checkers out there, while daffodil farming has declined in some areas, the UK still produces 90% of the world's cut daffodils and exports to Europe and the United States; in fact, 80% of these daffodils are grown in Cornwall and yet, for some unknown reason the authorities in Saint Blazey are out to rid the Community of this dangerous flower.

But after all that, we’re still no closer to knowing who killed these daffodils. Is there some mad person on the loose in Saint Blazey whacking flowers off at their stem in the middle of the night? Or is the council involved in a coverup? Does the culprit have plans to continue their war on flowers?

This is a serious subject, indeed, are other genera of plants safe?

I think a public inquiry is needed.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

For years Hunter Biden has been selling access to his father - then Vice President of the United States and now Democrat pResident in the White House (note, whenever a Democrat controls the Executive Branch, the “P” is silent). Anyway, everyone knows that Hunter was selling access to his father and to the Obama Administration in Ukraine, China, and other countries. And this fact has been available for [sic] everyone who would listen.

Hunter has earned millions of dollars for himself and for the Biden family and he’s been passing a substantial share of that loot to the “Big Guy”, who according to Tony Bobulinski, Hunter’s business partner and Biden family confidant, the “Big Guy” is Joe Biden.

If you doubt any of that, then, ask yourself how Joe Biden can afford three homes on a public servant’s salary… I’ve always wondered why the Internal Revenue Service doesn’t simply compare income tax returns for public officials with State property tax records but if it does, why hasn’t his lavish spending raised a red flag before? In any event, if the “Big Guy” isn’t Joe, then, who is it? Obama?

So, quite a lot of what we know about Hunter’s wheeling and dealing comes from a laptop that he left at a Delaware repair shop, which was subsequently collected by the FBI. In the lead-up to the 2020 Presidential Election, there was a coordinated effort by social media, corporate media, and former government employees to censor these facts and the content of the laptop, all of which we know to be true.

According to Chris Swecker, who served as assistant director of the FBI Criminal Investigative Division, the FBI left a receipt when Hunter’s laptop was collected by the Bureau. That receipt reveals what he called a “272 file” number, which Swecker says confirms an ongoing money-laundering investigation, at that time. Meaning, the FBI was investigating Hunter Biden before the election and yet the American public was denied that information.

So, here's the thing. Did Joe know? OF COURSE, Joe Biden knew about Hunter’s pay-for-play scheme. Joe was receiving his share of the money. But he can’t admit to it because its grounds for impeachment and then criminal prosecution after removal from office. The question is will Joe Biden throw his son under the bus?

The only ‘out’ for Joe is to deny ALL knowledge of Hunter’s dealings, but this leaves his son open to fraud charges. Selling or attempting to sell influence to a public official, when the person isn’t involved is a clear case of fraud, this quite apart from the unlawful influence-selling scheme itself.

So, what will Joe Biden do? Will he throw Hunter under the bus and try to get his Administration’s Justice Department to sweep this mess under the carpet? I don’t think so. I believe that Hunter is going down. The question is, will Joe Biden be going with him?

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

During the 2020 U.S. Presidential election campaign, everyone saw and any genuinely open-minded person would have accepted that Joe Biden was suffering from some form of cognitive impairment. He didn’t actually campaign in any traditional sense of the word.

Instead, his periodic pronouncements from the ‘basement’ and a compliant media reinforcing his message and the unlawful acts in at least six States, by those in control of the election process together with corporate media pronouncing any independent challenge to what was happening as untrue or a conspiracy theory, much like what was done with the Hunter Biden laptop story, assured Biden his “victory”.

But the laptop story was true then AND it’s now been confirmed true or rather, it’s been accepted as having been true, but not before the damage was done. At the time, more than fifty members of the U.S. Intelligence Community pronounced the irrefutable facts that both Hunter and his father were compromised on several fronts, as Russian propaganda… The truth is Joe Biden, and his family are compromised, with kickbacks from Ukraine, China, and other countries and personal involvements that leave them open to blackmail.

Now, after more than a year of Biden’s constant stumbling, bumbling attempts at communication there can be no doubt. Joe Biden is suffering from Alzheimer's disease, which is a progressive neurologic disorder that causes the brain to shrink or atrophy and for brain cells to die.

Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia, a continuous decline in thinking, and behavioral and social skills that affect a person's ability to function independently.

Of course, millions of Americans and others around the world will have witnessed the symptoms in their own families and so anyone who is honest knows that Biden is unable to function independently. It's a fact. Biden has dementia.

The only question is who is running the country? Who is in charge? It’s not Biden. Who is making the important decisions before they force Biden’s hand across the page for a signature?

I know that Leftists are afraid of removing Biden with the 25th Amendment because Kamala Harris would automatically become President. The Democrats know only too well that with Harris as President the chances of returning a Democrat to the White House would be impossible. So, they need to somehow carry Biden, while they search for an electable replacement. But at what cost?

After just one year, the economy is in the toilet. The border is an open gateway for millions of illegals to cross and the threat of World War is a far greater risk than ever before and without a Commander in Chief in charge who understands what’s happening and is able to respond in real-time without confusion and without an unelected unknown third party making the decisions, there is a serious National Security threat for America and that threat is Joe Biden. Whatever you think of Kamala Harris, Joe Biden must be removed, and now!

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Today, it’s Russian sanctions. I am incensed by the people who are celebrating what equates to the theft of personal property based upon whether successful businesspeople, and some former politicians have, or, as is the case, HAD some tenuous association with Vladimir Putin.

Regardless of your take on the Russian invasion of Ukraine (and I’ll have something to say about that sooner rather than later), the fact remains that NONE of these so-called "Russian oligarchs" have ANYTHING to do with the running of Russia or the invasion of Ukraine and so they’re not oligarchs at all. What these people are, is, successful businessmen and according to a list produced by the British government, one Russian woman.

Does anyone seriously believe that Putin didn’t anticipate this knee-jerk action by Western governments, who frankly, are using the war in Ukraine as a means to justify their existence, but more importantly, as a second act after the COVID19 ‘crisis’ failed to cover up their financial incompetence?

None of these sanctions will seriously impact Putin, Russia, or the Russian people. To think otherwise is ridiculous. These sanctions will drive up the cost of oil and national gas for the West and they will cause food shortages in the West and very likely cause the U.S. dollar to crash.

But of course, it's easy to get people with very little money to retaliate against the wealthy, and that's what our leaders are hoping for... to keep the peasants busy hating on Putin while they pass billions to their friends who produce the military equipment, paid for by the taxpayers, and gifted to Ukraine.

No matter what you think about Russia or Ukraine, the sanctions are theft, with extra steps. Pure and simple.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

What the Hell is wrong with people?

When did society lose its spine? Whether it’s safe spaces, so-called ‘inclusiveness’ or the deviants who have been granted access to our children and who seek to encourage their ‘feminine side’… from where I sit, we are collectively encouraging the pussification of an entire generation.

Pick a subject; whether it’s the war in Ukraine, COVID19 vaccines, or vaccines in general, the “trans-Community”, or frankly, any subject. Whenever I speak to people about any of these subjects, they’re unable to express their opinion without first prefacing it with ‘I’m not anti… but….’ and then they add whatever they intended to say.

Why start the discussion with an assumption about what I might think about what you might say? If I’ve already heard what you’re going to say, why are you telling me again? If you are assuming what I am going to think, why do you start from the negative? I might actually agree with you!

Of course, based on your assumptions I’ll more than likely think you’re a fool. BUT WHO CARES???

This is my opinion. I don’t need a safe space. I don’t take medications of ANY kind that I don’t need… and I think inclusiveness starts with someone wanting to belong to an existing society, not change the one we have. And, frankly, I think anyone who tries to teach young children about sex or discusses their sex life with preteen children should be arrested and prosecuted.

I am still young enough to be ABLE to remember when people had spines to go along with their opinions.

People grow a spine! Just say what you think!!

STOP coddling and enabling the whining, militant Leftists among us. They’re insane.

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Last December, Prime Minister Boris Johnson categorically denied that any COVID19 rules had been broken by him or anyone at Number 10; saying quite clearly in the House of Commons and elsewhere that “No rules were broken”. He repeated this claim a number of times.

BOJO uttered that lie when he knew perfectly well that the rules had been broken AND not once, not twice, not, not three times (which some might forgive) but dozens of times and not by a couple rogue members of staff, but by a majority of the Downing Street employees… BUT more importantly, by the Prime Minister himself! Frankly, either the Prime Minister lied or he’s simply not mentally fit to lead the country.

As we approach the 1st of April this Prime Minister continues to prove time and again that the joke is well and truly on the British public. Boris Johnson does not accept that he is subject to the same rules he sets for everyone else.

This Prime Minister’s political life, even before he became leader of the ‘Conservative’ Party, has been the subject of investigation after investigation, scandal after scandal and yet now, as Prime Minister and as his arrogant and reckless behaviour continues, he refuses to resign.

The Party faithful, as expected, defend him, claiming among other so-called ‘achievements’ that he ‘Got Brexit Done’ and that he’s implemented a points-based immigration system, but neither of those claims are true. We’re no further out of Europe than we were before Brexit and the government’s plan to accept tens if not hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian immigrants and to grant them immediate access to the National Health and other benefit entitlements because of a war that threatens Europe, which by the way we’re supposed to have left, reveals that his achievements are not fit for purpose.

Today we learned that more than 20 fixed penalty notices or fines have been issued to members of the Downing Street staff and while the Prime Minister’s name was not found within the first tranche of ‘tickets’ more fines are said to be coming so time will tell whether Boris Johnson will get his at a later date. What we know if that he lied to Parliament when he claimed no rules were broken.

It would be impossible for him not to have known that wine and cheese parties, bring your own booze gatherings and his own birthday party were not violations of the strict COVID19 rules he had imposed on the rest of the nation and to suggest otherwise is to ignore the obvious.

I don’t care that Downing Street was having parties. Their behaviour merely confirms what I already knew to be true and which the Prime Minister and his lackeys understood all too well—that the COVID19 restrictions were political theatre, a plan to control the masses and to divert attention from the real truth… that the economy was in the toilet.

Surely Boris Johnson understands that the pandemic came at the perfect time to protect his administration from the reality of Brexit. COVID19 was used to excuse why the economy was in shambles. The government milked that excuse for as long as it could and then as if by magic, the Russian invasion of Ukraine miraculously appeared to take the place of waning death and infection rates, that signaled that that ruse had run its course (meaning the peasants would no longer submit).

The sad truth is that very few people actually believe this Prime Minister when he speaks. The people deserve better. He is a serial liar, a disgrace to the woman and many men who held this High Office before him and who somehow managed to do so without lying as he does. It’s time for him to resign.

Boris Johnson has gotta go!

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Listening to Commentators and reading people’s Tweets about Will Smith’s recent behaviour at the Oscars, I could be forgiven for thinking that Black Lives no longer matter.

But, I am shocked. Shocked I tell you, that a Black man could be attacked at a public venue and no one would come to his aid. And while the majority of the witnesses were White, a number of the audience were Black and Hispanic, and yet all of these people failed to act—it’s shocking. Truly shocking.

Of course, I am speaking about the bitch slap that’s been heard around the world-- Another in a growing list of subjects that clearly divides our society, but just in case you’ve been in a coma for the last couple of days, the other night Chris Rock, a comedian, took a comedic swipe at Jada, Will Smith’s wife who sports a skinhead because of Alopecia, which sounds very serious indeed, but simply means hair loss or baldness. So, basically, she’s a bald chick.

In his monologue, Chris Rock referred to a potential G.I. Jane sequel, because Demi Moore famously shaved her head for the 1997 Ridley Scott film. I thought it funny, but maybe you disagree...

At first, both Smiths appeared to chuckle, but Jada grimaced slightly, and then Will found it necessary to march onto the stage and rather dramatically bitch slap Chris Rock. After the assault, Smith returned to his seat and then shouted a number of aggressive, fouled mouth demands to the comedian, who tried to laugh it off…

What didn’t happen was that no one ran onto the stage to protect Chris Rock. No one sought to prevent a visibly upset and verbally threatening Will Smith from returning to the stage, to finish his victim off… Security and police, who are present at all such events (not to mention all of the minders who must be standing in the wings), failed to move in, to detain, or dare I say, arrest Will Smith for what is clearly battery. By the way, Section 242 of the California Penal Code defines battery as "any willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon the person of another," punishable by a fine not exceeding $2,000 dollars, and/or by imprisonment in jail for a maximum of six months. When witnessed by police it does not require a complaint, so, why hasn’t Will Smith been charged?

Is it simply okay to batter someone if they insult your wife?

Would it have been different if instead of Will Smith, a white man had committed the crime?

What if someone insults your child?

What is wrong with those people who applaud Will Smith's behaviour? Where does it end?

Will Smith should be charged!

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Ask yourself… How much is too much!?

Does everyone within the sound of my voice think that when we started electing the most popular people, instead of the most qualified person to rule a nation that it meant these people could tax us without limit and then spend MORE money than they collect?

When is the last time that any government, anywhere, checked with the taxpayers before they ran up more debt in our names than could ever possibly be repaid?

Do you agree with government sending billions of pounds [or dollars, whatever] worth of military equipment off to other countries that we literally spent years trying to distance ourselves from? Taxpayers paid for the equipment or more accurately are still paying for it and so shouldn’t we collectively get a say when our property is shipped off to our ‘neighbour’, nearly 2,000 miles away?

I want to know... Do you seriously think any of the money politicians spend on their pet projects is their money? When government announces its latest spending spree don’t you ask yourself ‘when will it end?’

We’ve just been through more than two years of GLOBAL out of control spending, while at the same time governments shut down nearly every business and prohibited people from working and to add insult to injury, our leaders paid people money to stay home, money they didn’t have and which we will have to repay.

We can obviously debate whether or not anything that government did during the recent pandemic made a positive contribution to the health of a nation, and I would argue that what they did actually caused more deaths than it saved, but what we know for damned sure is that those in charge have destroyed the economies of a majority of the countries on earth.

‘Am I the only one that thinks it’s time for an intervention?

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

They’re at it again, folks. For the love of G-D, Leftists are at it again...

While in Jamaica a couple of days ago, Prince William expressed his 'profound sorrow' at the 'abhorrent' slavery and echoed his father's sentiments, saying it (historical slavery) 'stains' British history in what some people called an 'emotional speech'. Just why he felt he had to say anything is anyone’s guess.

Leftists immediately blasted his words as unacceptable because William failed to grovel and apologise to locals for events that happened hundreds of years before he was born.

I'll blast William's speech because it's complete nonsense.

What Prince William and anyone who has ever asked about this subject should have said is that it's ancient history--Britain abolished slavery in 1805. People who are REALLY concerned with such matters should look toward China and several Arab nations that practice slavery today!

But the Left, who hate Britain and will do whatever they can to degrade its rich history demand is an apology for slavery... Apologise? To WHOM? Every victim of slavery that took place at the hands of the British Commonwealth is long dead. Who would we be apologising to?

These insane militant Leftists are NATURALLY demanding reparations. Of course, they are... It’s always about money with these people… Reparations are always sought by the idiots who wrongly believe money paid to SOMEONE by government is the government's money. It's not. It's the taxpayers' money, and none of Britain’s taxpayers have contributed in any way to anyone ever being enslaved.

They’re insane. The whole proposition is ridiculous!

View Details

by Bill White

[Transcript]

Many politicians and others have recently been placed in the unwelcomed position of having to state publicly how they define “a woman’, in recent days some journalists have been asking "How do you define a woman?" Or simply, "What is a woman?" The responses to that simple question have been quite extraordinary.

Former Vice President Biden's recent Appointee to the U.S. Supreme Court, Ketanji Brown Jackson when asked, replied, "I'm not a biologist" and then refused to be drawn into the question further. Biden (literally) appointed this person BECAUSE she is a black woman as he has said many times. Imagine for a minute giving evidence in Judge Jackson's court when a lawyer asks you to tell the court if the person who assaulted the victim was a man or a woman and you reply; "I don't know, I'm not a biologist." Does anyone seriously believe that you could offer such a flippant, unresponsive reply?

Others are no better, for example, Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who got closer, but even BoJo refused to simply state the irrefutable facts yesterday when he was asked the same question.

This weak, feckless, and frankly, pathetic virtue signaling to the militant Left, WHO ARE seeking to destroy our society, will not end well. Either our 'leaders' will push back to protect our culture and society or the sane among us will eventually remove them from office.

The answer is really quite simple: A woman is an adult human female.

Wait, you might ask: What's a female? Well, as it terms out, there is a foolproof scientific test for that and as Leftists constantly remind us, we MUST FOLLOW THE SCIENCE. Females have two X chromosomes, while males have one X and one Y chromosome.

Question: What is a woman?

Answer: A woman is an adult human with two X chromosomes.

It is really that easy.

There is another equally foolproof VISUAL test that’s been used by every doctor attending the birth of a human being since the dawn of man and while I have never tested someone's chromosomes, I have applied the other test and, in my experience, it works a treat!