Altcoin Author: Recent Episodes

View Details

I’ve had some requests to have the audio of my weekly blockchain newsletter so I’m happy to oblige this request. I listen to podcasts while driving or golfing so I love this idea. Enjoy!

—

Visa just spent $150,000 for a non-fungible token "NFT" of a digital punk from the CryptoPunks collection from the Larva Labs studio.

This is a watershed moment for a number of reasons:

1) Visa is a monolith of a traditional financial institution finally cow-towing to a crypto project.

Visa, and traditional financial USD fiat-dependent institutions, have long been antithetical to any type of cryptocurrency or blockchain developments. The growth of this ecosystem takes away from activity in the traditional, antiquated financial markets, of which Visa has a considerable stake and vested interest in its continued utility.

2) It's a huge PR boost for Larva Labs & the use case of expensive art on the blockchain.

While most NFTs are less than $100 in value, there is also a handful of projects that see 6-figure sales as a regularity. For some, you can't even buy any of the project's NFTs without shelling out the cost of the downpayment on a house or the whole house itself.

Many would have scoffed at well-heeled, rational investors dipping heavily into their pockets to include this digital art into the alternative asset segment of their portfolio.

It creates further visibility for the important work that Larva Labs is doing to build out this nascent industry of digital art, long ridiculed as having no meaningful value beyond that with a corporation will throw in an artists direction to fashion something together. The narrative forever, and continues to be, is that art is seemingly devoid of value without having been hand painted with oils or pastels and signed by the artist themselves in a 1/1 or as part of a limited series.

We're talking about art that can be resold at auction with real collectibility value. Do not buy art on a cruise ship or anything other than authorized, or signed, by the artist themselves and be exceptionally careful when it's authorized "by the estate" of an artist. These works largely have no value.

3) OpenSea has been crowned King of the NFT platforms

As the home of CryptoPunks, this represents an important feat for OpenSea, which has been an absolute behemoth in the space with an avalanche of activity and the de facto home for NFTs.

The secret sauce of with OpenSea was their willingness to let everyone with a Web 3.0 wallet, like Metamask, on that platform. Other platforms were curating for the most sellable artists and hoped to market them on their own, but, in the process, they left out 99% of artists, who felt spurned, and these artists brought their fans to OpenSea to see their exhibited works.

Further, the willingness of OpenSea to start integrating blockchains other than Ethereum, like Polygon, represents a demonstrated willingness to be nimble in terms of alternative blockchain architectures. Many in the ecosystem are Ethereum maximalists and prefer to absorb the high gas fees associated with using this, presently, hugely congested network as opposed to entertaining bringing NFTs to other blockchains like xDAI, Polygon, Binance Smart Chain, or any number of different Smart Contract capable blockchains.

4) It introduces a level of seriousness to the NFT discussion.

For years, the NFT community was mocked, slighted, and any committed artist to this space was seen as scraping the last dredges of monetization to support their fledging art to debase themselves to hocking NFTs, the ultimate belittlement to corral what could be collected in terms of an earnings. Well-known contemporary artists would not lower themselves to introduce an NFT offering, much like film actors, for the longest time, looked down upon TV work as often embarrassing to have to take on, the sign that one's career was on the descent rather than ascent. Now it seems every major movie star either is in a TV project for Netflix, or another production company, or their in-house production companies have a TV project in the works. Hopefully NFTs continue to enjoy a shift of this scope.

It's perfectly rational, however, that if someone is given a one person show in the Chelsea Art District in Manhattan that one would immediately take it, and that's what Damien Hurst, and other contemporary artist visionaries, regularly do. It puts them in front of an elite set of art buyers who appreciate the 1-on-1 experience of interfacing with an artist to learn a bit of their style, but also revel in the flattering attention that whales of the art collecting market demand and enjoy.

Artists do this but now they are also doing NFTs as well.

5) It introduces NFTs to, effectively, the world.

The number of people who have a Visa card is jaw-dropping: 353 million in the US and 803 million outside of the US, cumulatively 1.141 billion.

Visa's efforts to trumpet their foray into the space is illuminating NFTs on the world stage in a way that crypto enthusiasts and mass adoption advocates have been pining for since the birth of blockchain.

Instead of introducing NFTs to the world through the prism of "Why would someone pay $69 million for an image you could copy and paste to your desktop for free," you're seeing, "Wow, it looks like even long-standing mainstream financial institutions are relenting to the pressure to be seen as first-movers in tech, with the hopes of earning some level of accompanying positive press praising their forethought. Maybe there's something to this blockchain deal." This does much to change the collective narrative.

I do a fair amount of content crafting, consulting, and coding for an NFT-focused project, the NFTsDAO, and from my experience with them, and having owned NFTs since the CryptoKitties craze of 2017, I have a few thoughts on NFTs as an asset class.

1) It's speculative, unless wrapped with a token or instrument of range-bound value

The value of these assets is largely a function of which prominent accounts are trumpeting a project's praise. There are many Twitter accounts that are well-regarded and invest a full-time effort into finding high-value, low-cost NFTs, collecting a great many of them, and then singing their praises. This is the essence of investing through social proof. Winners have many fathers, but failure is an orphan. In the eye of an investor, the likelihood that when an analyst makes a prediction about a project then it's a bullish sign. While, as every disclosure likes to broadcast, past performance is not indicative of future success, it is often a better bellwether than taking a random member of the population.

Cops will tell you that past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior, and in the venture capital world especially, a major consideration is who is the leadership team and who is investing in the company. If either the leadership or early round investors have an impressive track record then more investors feel comfortable with sticking their necks out and tossing their capital in a project's direction. Sophisticated investors often like the bet the jockey even over the horse, that is to say, if there's a really impressive leader at the helm of a company that is just marginal, they're still going to invest both because the company many be trading for a discount and because they trust that executive to be able to pull from the confidence chiseled from past successes and right the ship, resulting in a handsome multiple for investors.

2) Artists Need to be Visible

I see may artists that want to churn out a few dozen interesting looking works and then sit back as the perceived tsunami of royalties and sales sail in. It doesn't work that way. There are many undiscovered artists who are creating absolute masterpieces, but they struggle at how to even put in hashtags to their Tweets to get it in front of eyeballs or navigate Google Adwords to promote their art. The most successful artists have professional representation that help them piece together professionals that can grease the wheels on getting traction on the locomotive that hopefully becomes their freight train of a career.

One doesn't have to be polished enough to do a TED talk on the nuances of their artwork's meaning in the context of the broader art movement with which they most closely identify. One doesn't even have to have an academic bent to the way that one explains ones art, rather, I've observed that people just want to see the artist speaking confidently and intelligently on why they made what they did. Collectors like to see who is behind a particularly work of art and what it means to them. If this meaning resonates with the art enthusiast then they're likely to look into buying it. Introducing visibility is an exercise well worth undertaking.

For those that feel intimidated in front of others, fearing that they're going to be put on blast, on the spot, in a confrontational way by a passerby demanding that an artist justify themselves to him as to why, as the artist, one is asking these hard-earned $100 bills from his pocket for your drawing when he spend days or weeks to earn them. Thankfully, it's rarely that bad.

I enjoy attending Laguna Beach, California's annual Pageant of the Masters Festival where costumed actors recreate famous works of art in the evening and artists line the streets showing off their paintings and engage with passersby about their work during the day. The works are often so expensive that it'll blow through any credit card's upper limits so artists facilitate purchase orders for invoice payments through a nearby partner gallery. In all of my time going, I've only heard a few gasps when bending over to take a look at the army of zeros the follow an beginning number on the paintings price or tourists saying, within earshot of the artist, "welp, that's more than our house."

Art is largely a business of pleasantries, compared to most professions, so the intimidation that many artists that I speak with is, as I tell them, misplaced.

You will have a person triggered as to why this part of culture is so valued while their situation in life makes them feel less valued, but I often tell people to look forward to these confrontational situations because the aftermath is that you will have experienced the worst of having to interface with the public in a professional capacity.

3) An NFT business is a Viable Business

Many NFT projects have a royalty fee of 5 - 10% on every sale. This is a digital type of Droit de suite or Artist's Resell Rights that returns value to the artist with each transaction. This creates a permanent, and recurring, incentive for artists to make a splash in popular culture, in the art world, and essentially extends the freedom to them to have a baseline, passive income while they're crafting more pieces and building their prominence in their chosen niche of the art world. This royalty structure is also why European artists have a comfortable retirement reserved for the South of France or Spain, with the active resale of works painted in their youth bearing fruit for the comfort of their retirement.

No such law exists in the US, or most all of the rest of the world outside of Europe, except for Australia and the Phillipines. The California Resale Royalties Act, which mandated a 5% royalty rate for works over $1000, was ruled by the federal 9th circuit court to have been federally preempted by the Copyright Act, which affords no such royalty provisions.

These royalties, minted in Smart Contracts, do more to protect artists than most of the world's countries, largely because it's the artists themselves who are coding these NFTs.

NFT studios, like NFTsDAO, earn a handsome slice of the earnings of all NFTs minted, and sold, by their artists. Keep it mind that NFTs are not limited to visual images, but increasingly music and video are being integrated into powerful NFTs that share royalties with NFT holders. Podcast hosts will mint an audio NFT and distribute rewards earned from advertisements or offer other perks, including sometimes extending copyright rights to the holders of these NFTs. We could be in a situation where a brand likes the song of an artist, and they have sold the rights to this song in an NFT. Should they want to license the use of the song they would have to buy this NFT from its present owner, earning a healthy profit for the NFT holder as well as the musician, through the royalty structure.

The possibilities outside of visual art is considerable and the floodgates are already starting to burst, with top electronic and hip-hop music artists dipping their toe into the markets.

You may have seen where Mila Kunis' NFT project requires that you own the actual NFT in order to access the Stoner Cats cartoon content.

The allure of this model is that not only do you have access to your desired cartoon, community credibility that you're invested in this space through owning the NFT, but you also stand a good chance of seeing appreciation on your NFT as a result of the supply/demand imbalance between the number of people that wish to watch the cartoon adjust versus the number of people who have tokens that afford such privileges.

Consider this: when you buy a concert ticket, the actual ticket stub post-concert effectively holds no value, beyond what you can sell it for on eBay for nostalgia's sake or if it was historically significant like a ticket to Woodstock. Rather than losing 99.9% of the value immediately after the show, with NFTs you can retain a good amount of value and possibly see an appreciation. That's powerful.

Stateside you're seeing A-list celebrities, like Mila, going in first into NFTs because any other avenue of crypto, like decentralized finance, is a securities laws nightmare. Only huge blockchain projects presented by billionaires, in Gemini or FTX, are able to come to the table with a government relations, compliance, and securities lawyers budget of the type of magnitude to attempt to operate in the US. FTX says flat out that their platform's token is not for sale to Americans under any circumstances. This speaks to the thorniness of securities laws and the antithetical stance that securities companies are taking to all things blockchain, seeing it, rightly, as an intruder to the securities space impugning upon their territory.

Western Europe, Asia, Australia, and Canada are more hospitable and that's where most of projects are based, with a Singapore, Hong Kong, Spain, and Portugal being particularly popular.

If you're interested in NFTs check out the NFTsDAO, this newsletter, OpenSea.io, or your favorite crypto periodical for the latest developments! If you liked this article send it to a friend to subscribe. Thanks, guys.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit altcoins.substack.com

View Details

So big news out of Toronto. The Toronto Stock Exchange listed, finally, after three years, a Bitcoin Fund and the fund itself is on the main website, you can see its net asset value so it’s just like a traditional fund like a mutual fund or an index fund

And this is huge in the sense that the main TSX and the venture group, which is for the smaller companies in Toronto. And then for the traditional Toronto Stock Exchange, these are aimed at retail buyers so this is focused on people that could just go to their local brokerages in Canada, and buy part of the fund. In the past, there's been a lot of excitement about getting listed on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the CBOE. Futures exchanges attract a different type of investor, one usually more sophisticated, better-heeled that knows the ropes of high frequency trading. They know how to manage terrifyingly scary, but also exciting, margin position leverage. Not even that many trade futures when you compare these specialized traders versus retail investments in the general market. Retail trading makes it easier for people. You know they have a binary option exchanges, like Nadex, that will take the future positions themselves on a wholesale basis, but if you want to do something on the upside or downside, they kind of ladder it so it's like if it hits a certain amount, you'll get a payout or if it doesn't then you know you can structure an order a few ways to match your risk profile and what you're thinking. What you're trying to do to time the market, which is a pretty difficult thing to do.
So, for it to be listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange is a watershed moment for Bitcoin. It could mean that these people that have heard about Bitcoin, that have kind of thought about it as a long term investment and have considered dabbling in it. You hear people like Mark Cuban saying that 1% of your assets should be invested in it as well as some endowment funds. I think Yale's endowment fund is saying we're going to put 1% into blockchain technology that's getting adopted by large enterprise solution companies like Microsoft and IBM, so people that are looking for the long term investors are putting aside a certain amount to invest in it with the hopes that it’ll pop in the way that many people think that it might and the investment would do tremendously well.

In terms of mass adoption basis, these are individual investors that are taking stakes. You don't have to be an accredited investor. You don't have to have a Bloomberg terminal. You don't have to have all these fancy certifications. You can go in and just buy part of the fund. I'm in no way affiliated with the fund, but, from what I read, it's associated with the Winklevoss twins and Gemini. Out of really all the stable coins, I like Gemini, because it's backed by the Winklevoss twins who are extremely well-heeled. And they partner with State Street, which is like the top partner for the NYSE and a lot of the biggest Wall Street organizations. And on top of that the Winklevosses have notoriety, connections with Zuckerberg, and their classmates at Harvard so they know all of the establishment guys in the banking industry, so I feel more comfortable giving my money, through custodial ownership to someone, who really has a lot to lose. I guess the same could be said for reasons why investing with Bernie Madoff, when it was incredibly connected and established professionally, with him even being on the board one of the exchanges in New York, but I just feel genuinely good about what the Winklevoss twins are doing for the crypto space blockchain. They're doing the 60 minutes on American television. They're doing all sorts of these adoption efforts to introduce people to Bitcoin, and it does benefit them, but I think they're doing it well and not trying to hog all of the fame. They're being smart and looking to the long-term. They did have some good forethought when they got pitched bitcoin in Ibiza and went ahead and got a massive position.

So I think the fund is moving in the correct direction with the best-in-class custodial entity in Gemini. It always makes me nervous when people bring in their own rogue lawyers or accountants. So, I'm interested to see the adoption that this gets in the weeks ahead. About 78,000 shares for $11 Canadian dollars were traded on the day that I looked.

I really would contend that this development with the Bitcoin fund listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange is as impactful and momentous as the CFTC agreeing to have Bitcoin be traded on this two futures exchange in the United States, and that, in and of itself, was a big hurdle, but I think it only goes to show that the three years they put in that shows the resistance, that was going on there with the nebulous legal situation with the Bit licenses and all sorts of uncertainty for this to go through. I think is a good move for the Bitcoin and the ecosystem at large.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit altcoins.substack.com

View Details

Hey guys, Altcoin Author, thanks for checking out my crypto podcast. So let's jump right in.

How's it going, guys? I figured that just because the markets are the way they are and people are asking me about what overall trends and macro developments I should be looking for. Definitely we'll talk about blockchain technology, but I also think it's important to address some of the macro trends and how things are going there from a crypto vantage point, from a blockchain vantage point, from someone in the space that looks to revolutionize the way that a lot of these industries are done specific to the service industry, like accounting and law and different industries that are high paying, and then have inefficiencies that can be tweaked for the benefit of especially small businesses. You're seeing another down market today.

I mentioned on the last episode that for over a month, there was not two consecutive days where the market finished up. That just goes to show that we've hit a level of largely uncharged territory where the volatility is really off the chain. History tells us that in the 1920s, when that 1929 stock market crash happened, it was really accelerated because margin was easy to come by and now, with margin on futures exchanges, and then also on contract for difference platforms, you can really get humongous margin on the S&P on various indexes. And there are traders that try to get in when there's a huge dip on a lot of the platforms, mostly crypto platforms, they have like bankruptcy provisions. So they designate and split a certain amount of revenue that they get for the trades in anticipation that because some of these trades can go in at 101x, or even 125x I've seen for crypto, and for offshore Forex it can be up to 3000x, that, if there's a huge movement, they're going to get closed out.

But a lot of these platforms guarantee that it's not like a margin trade where if it just dumps then you can get sued or they'll come after you. Not only that, but you can actually subdivide and get independent accounts within a single umbrella account. So if one account goes bust, then the other ones will be unaffected. And what a lot of people do is they'll go long in one and short on another with the hopes that when there's a huge movement, one will get closed out, and at the other will rocket up, so really, the absorption of the loss is being felt by the exchange, and historically, a lot of the these crypto exchanges and offshore exchanges that don't fall into the purview of the CFTC or SEC regulations for holding these securities will do a haircut to everyone. They'll take like a percentage of the total assets that are on there so everyone feels the pain.

Obviously, you'd feel it the most if you have the most on there, but the idea is kind of that the community shares in the losses together, but, with this bankruptcy provision, it's not as traumatic for people to pay just a little bit, you know, a little percentage more on each trade. And it adds up nicely, as opposed to seeing that you've spent months and months making gains and you're 30% up, but you have to take a 30% haircut. So after putting dozens and dozens of hours of trying to time the market or trying to identify these macro trends and be at the right place at the right time, you're actually back where you started from. So that's frustrating, and leads people to get angry, mistreat the management of the firm, and often encourage people not to use that particular platform. The market books for crypto as it is are very thin and you see that when there's a big movement, even ones that have a lot of collateral coverage, these order books dry up. So you see people during these huge swings buying Ethereum for five bucks when the true value is many hundreds of dollars.

People do putting in market orders and stack the market books so that if someone mistakenly puts in a market order thinking that was a limit order, then it'll get filled whether you offer market price or a penny. If they get it filled then they immediately can recognize a gain on buying it for $5 and then selling it for $200. So there's a lot of depth issues that you have to consider when you're going into a crypto platform where you're doing some trading. Of course, check with your local jurisdictions and with the laws pertaining to what you can invest in. If you are doing it through a proxy or a partner organization that manages on your behalf for your trust or a different formation that you have for crypto, then make sure you're in compliance there because there are tax ramifications of various trades and I know that in Wyoming that they have new laws that protect you when you go from Bitcoin to Ethereum and having it be a taxable sale, if it's done during the course of the year and you know that they have ways to not make those taxable events, but each state's really figuring it out. And the IRS is just going with what people give them.

It's well known that there are blockchain sleuths that will audit with the help of Coinbase and with a lot of the bigger partners that partner with government agencies that want to keep their bit license or keep their regulations in order because they're publicly traded or they're doing business with Americans, and they're handing over the tax data to the IRS. It's already been widely reported on Cointelegraph that most all the biggest US crypto exchanges at least do provide information about a blockchain address with the social security number or the name of a particular person so the IRS can know that, oh, this person didn't actually claim any gains, but Coinbase associated him with this wallet and it bought a thousand in Bitcoin and then sent it to an exchange when it was work 5 thousand later on so it's something to think about. Be careful because if you're feeling IRS false statements then a costly audit will likely be in your future. Definitely good to be looking at tax considerations when investing. In terms of how crypto tax transactions can benefit you, taking tax losses can be used to offset other passive gains. If you had a bunch of Bitcoin when it was at $10,000 or $20,000, and now it's at $6,000 then you can harvest a good deal of passive losses.

You may be able to made these trades treated as active losses if you qualify based on a certain amount of your time being spent into full-time crypto trading. But at very least these passive losses may be helpful in eating away at any the tax obligations you may have on passive gains. So at this time, when everything's really crashing, it might be a good time to "harvest your losses" by go through your portfolio and see what you can sell, not do a wash sale, but go through and say: Oh, this is highly correlated with this and I already have coverage on this so I'm going to go ahead and close out this position.

As for macro trends, there is a lot of activity surrounding stocks that are not going to particularly do well. I'm thinking Royal Caribbean. I'm thinking stocks that rely upon the travel industry. If you're having a lot of guidance from the government, and it's being doubled down on and reiterated that American should not travel, and then on some sites that I'm on where I do like Airbnb-type travel, a lot of people are canceling through November.

Many of these people watching "AirBNB your way to millions" videos on YouTube are highly leveraged and have 10 properties, and if you're not going to be able to get any revenue between March to November, and you're relying upon the benevolence of the mortgage companies and banks to not foreclose and to give you a little bit of leeway while they figure things out then that's a fragile position to be in. I have heard discussions about instead of going to arrears that the banks' are putting payments on the back end, which would be extremely helpful for people that have overextended themselves. Already I'll say that, yeah, there's a lot of properties that are being thrown in the market because they were bought in 2017, or even 2018, and they've either done renovations and stopped or they don't think that the market is going to bounce back as quickly. So they throw it back on the market and try to recoup their losses, or, ideally, get back what they put in. So very interesting developments there.

In terms of the crypto news specific to a Ethereum, they have a bunch of work being done and GitCoin, which partners with GitHub, and it encourages people to follow and support people in the crypto community that do a lot of watchdog work to the benefit of the community. I like how Ethereum makes a special effort here, with Vitalik Buterin actually giving $90,000 of his own Ethereum to support small-end developers that are doing exciting projects as a hobby or to beef up their Gitcoin/resume, and, in the process, getting a lot of traction like 1inch.exchange with their DEX Aggregator and are doing a lot of good things in the ecosystem. I follow Chris Blec and he does a lot of watchdog work and following all of these DAOs that are trying to push out their product and get things go with their own situation, because they see a lot of the volume, they see that DeFi hit a $1 billion briefly before Ethereum got rekt.

While it that took away a lot of market cap, it's still $600 million+ in terms of actual US dollars. So there's a lot of money there to be had. And people recognize that people who are that are at the forefront of crypto are doing well. They're getting a lot of backing from these small seed crypto funds, or people that recognize there's a huge disconnect between people doing something in their dorm room and someone like MakerDAO that is scaled or like Nuo that scaled in the defy space and are getting, you know, money from Sequoia and money from some of the biggest VC firms and lots of zeros. So it's kind of like as a middle ground. And if things can be kept open source like Vitalik talks about then a lot of good can come of Ethereum and all the code will be open source on explorers using the solidity so people can go on audit what they're actually interfacing with, you know, with pool together and all these bigger platforms that are being very transparent. And the transparency does give you a little bit of vulnerability in their terms that someone could reverse engineer exactly what you're doing. And then you're just really a marketing component behind that, like a brand behind that, because someone can literally do the exact thing that you do. And then it's really the value that you're bringing in the strength and integrity of your team. And then, as well, the marketing that surrounds it. So there really is a lot of magic dust or IP/trade secrets that has been evaporated with this level of transparency, but I think that's good for the ecosystem. And I like that Vitalik likes to encourage that innovation and imagination, because all these pet projects really do advance the ecosystem. And that's really been the reason why Ethereum has taken a leadership role in DeFi whereas it could have been done just as easily with Tron or with some of the other ecosystems that give you a certain amount of "energy," in the case of Tron, to do transactions for free whereas with Ethereum, it can be expensive but usually is relatively low, except during huge price movements when it can really jump up to $1 or $2. Even Chris Blec said up to $10 to send a little bit at peak periods. Thankfully with Ethereum the block times are incredibly swift so you don't have to pay very much and you can still reasonably expect to get confirmations in the next half an hour.
I'm looking forward to interviewing a few people in DeFi that I've met at my crypto conference travels and with whom I've stayed in touch. So we're having an exciting interview lined-up for next week who is one of the leaders of DeFi. He'll talk a little bit about the ecosystem, and how it really is changed in many ways, and how it's morphed since really even a few years ago when there has been very little activity to today when DeFi applications, on a day to day basis, enjoy many thousands of daily/24 hour users of these platforms and are generating enormous fees. These are actual people and, from what I've seen, relatively few bots, and I looked at a lot of the addresses and there's a lot of activity indicative of human activity. So I do see a lot of people tweeting about these same dApps so the excitement is palpable.

It's an exciting time for the space and to be moving forward with these types of applications and seeing DeFi and decentralized applications as a whole exploding into something much bigger, despite the fact that Ethereum is way down in price, is definitely exciting. Whether it goes one way or the other doesn't necessarily matter as when you invest you should have a long time-horizon. You should be there for the underlying technology, because that's what's really driving the innovation. And that's what's making some projects rise to the top and others flounder when some of the founders get discouraged with the Bitcoin going down or discouraged with the Crypto Winter that's negatively impacting their ability to float their coins and advanced whatever project they're trying to promote. The ones that are resilient are those that have been in the space for a while, are making regular advances, and have an active GitHub. Talk to you again, on Monday. Stay safe, pandemic peeps.
You've been listening to the Altcoin Author Crypto podcast. Thank you very much. And please remember to subscribe, go to my website, AltcoinAuthor.com, where I have a lot of free content specific to crypto have a newsletter with Altcoins.Substack.com, an ebook with Amazon "dApp Ubiquity: Anticipating the Avalanche of Adoption." Please listen to the episode up next if you're streaming or downloading. Subscribe to get access immediately to new podcasts.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit altcoins.substack.com

View Details

Corona & Crypto: Calculating the Community Costs: Altcoin Author Crypto Podcast #39

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit altcoins.substack.com