Divorce Matters: Recent Episodes
Michael Alexander and Mark Fidelman
Welcome to the Divorce Matters Podcast, where we give unfiltered, unadulterated guidance for how to survive family courts. We will give you no-nonsense, straight forward strategies for beating the system. We guarantee you won’t hear this advice anywhere else. A reminder that we are not attorneys and this is not legal advice. However, we’ll help you more than any attorney ever will.
Ginger Gentile. I'm the Erase child whisperer and I discuss parental alienation
Mark Fidelman and Ginger discussed strategies for dealing with parental alienation, including understanding love languages and acknowledging past trauma.
Ginger shared her personal experience of estrangement from their father and the impact it had on their life. The group also discussed the prevalence of narcissistic abuse and alienation in divorce cases, emphasizing the importance of identifying narcissistic traits early on and taking steps to protect oneself.
Ginger also highlighted the importance of learning how to communicate effectively with high conflict people in personal and professional settings, including identifying triggers, healing inner child wounds, and developing a new skill set for communicating with empathy, firmness, and informativeness.
Outline Parental alienation and high conflict divorce with a personal story. * Ginger Gentile shares her experience with parental alienation and high conflict divorce. * Speaker estranged from father after parents' divorce and subsequent parental alienation.
Intergenerational trauma and alienation in families. * Ginger revealed that their parents had 50/50 custody, but their mother accused their father of domestic violence and sought more child support. * Ginger believes that their parents' behavior was informed by their own love languages, with abuse being one of them. * Reconciling with estranged parents can be challenging, but it's possible with effort and support.
Parental alienation and its impact on children. * Ginger reflects on their parents' divorce and alienation, recognizing the nuanced complexity of the situation. * Ginger made a film about parental alienation, realizing it was about their own life after hanging up on their dad multiple times during filmmaking. * Ginger researched the topic by talking to parents and kids, including those on social media, to understand the impact of alienation on families.
Parental alienation documentary and its impact on kids. * Ginger raised half a million dollars for their documentary by changing their fundraising pitch from "thank you for coming" to "give me money or the film won't happen and you'll never see your kids again." * Mark Fidelman and Ginger agree that the documentary has raised awareness about parental alienation and its impact on children. * They suggest strategically showing the film to judges, lawyers, and psychologists to bring about change.
How to reconnect with alienated children without court involvement. * Ginger jokes about doing anything to see their kids, including hosting a free screening of a film in a library, but acknowledges that parents who are serious about reunification may not be willing to take such actions. * Ginger and Mark Fidelman discuss the challenges of getting back into a child's life when the child has been alienated by a parent, with Ginger emphasizing the importance of taking a proactive approach to reunification. * Ginger worked with a father to approach a court case non-confrontationally, resulting in overnights with his daughter without going to court. * Ginger helped the father see an opportunity to connect with his daughter instead of viewing it as a right, leading to a peaceful resolution.
Strategies for dealing with parental alienation in court. * Mark Fidelman suggests detaching from the alienator's reactions and using new communication methods to address the issue. * Ginger advises parents to act quickly if they suspect alienation, as courts can take years to resolve the issue. * Ginger warns that lawyers may give false odds of winning, and some outcomes may be impossible to achieve in family court.
Strategies for coping with alienation in children. * Ginger suggests that instead of trying to change the alienator, parents should focus on changing their own behavior to stop the alienation. * The speaker advises parents to use sweet talking and attention-seeking tactics to manipulate the alienator into changing their behavior. * Ginger helps parents who are alienated from their children by teaching them how to communicate effectively and rebuild their relationships. * Ginger's approach involves understanding the root cause of the alienation, letting go of anger and trauma, and learning how to message and communicate clearly.
How to identify and avoid narcissistic partners in relationships. * Mark Fidelman expresses frustration with family court system and its handling of parental alienation. * Ginger advises against marrying someone who is likely to alienate you due to their narcissistic tendencies. * Heal inner child, identify triggers, and develop communication skills to prevent alienation. * Learn to communicate with high conflict people using friendly, firm, and informative language.
Parental alienation and how to reunite with alienated kids. * Speaker provides free resources, including a film and training course, to help parents reunite with their alienated kids. * Speaker offers personalized coaching and a community forum for ongoing support. * Mark Fidelman and Ginger discuss the challenges of alienation in divorce and the importance of staying out of court. * Ginger shares her personal experience of being alienated and offers advice on how to reunite with one's children.
David Segui, Former MLB baseball player, discusses his nightmare with the family courts and family bridges David Segui discussed the challenges and misconceptions surrounding family court, particularly in cases of alleged child abuse, and the need for a different approach to better protect children. They also shared personal experiences and ongoing legal cases, highlighting the financial drain and manipulation of the system, and the importance of holding individuals accountable for their actions. The conversation concluded with a commitment to stop a certain issue from escalating and a pledge to remove judicial immunity, particularly in cases of flagrant lawbreaking. Sponsored by KidsMatter.charity We Give kids A Voice in Court
Podcast Summary Family Court Misconceptions and Reform
Mark and David Segui discussed the misconceptions and issues surrounding family court, particularly in cases of alleged child abuse. They argued that the current system often does more harm than good, with the industry's main goal being to reunify the child with the abusive parent, rather than protecting the child. The discussion highlighted the need for a different approach and better support for children who have experienced abuse.
Family Law, Child Custody, and Advocacy Mark and an anonymous David Segui discussed issues related to family law, with a focus on child custody and parental alienation. They discussed the challenges faced by families without financial means, and how the legal system can exacerbate existing problems. The conversation touched on the perception of power dynamics in family court, and the lack of understanding among the general public regarding the daily realities of those going through a divorce. Mark announced his return to advocacy work for children's rights, signaling a renewed commitment to the cause.
Discussing Abuse in Family Court System Mark and David Sege discussed the challenges faced by victims of abuse in the Family Court system. David, a former Major League Baseball player, introduced himself as a father involved in a Family Court case after escaping an abusive household environment. He shared how the court system operates through coercion and control, similar to abusive relationships, threatening consequences like losing child custody or facing sanctions for speaking out or reporting abuse. David mentioned guiding other "Momma Bears" through the process of reporting abuse while navigating the court system's challenges.
Navigating Family Court Challenges and Strategies The speakers discussed the challenges and strategies involved in navigating the family court system. They recognized that the system can be exploitative and compared it to a game, where certain parties have an advantage. David expressed concern about the financial drain that the system can cause and the difficulty in getting out of it once involved. They also discussed the need to remove judicial immunity to facilitate exit. The conversation then shifted to specific cases, with the speaker indicating that they would continue the discussion in this area.
Child Alienation Case and Custody Dispute The attorneys agreed on proceeding with the case, which involves allegations of child alienation. The main speaker described a situation where their children were taken away due to an emergency order, despite the children being found to be in good health and happy in California. The speaker claimed their ex-partner made false allegations of abuse and used threats to maintain control over the children. The case has been ongoing for over three months, and the speaker is seeking to regain custody of their children.
False Allegations and Child Abuse Discussion
The discussion centered around allegations of abuse made by David's sons against their mother and her boyfriend, who was a former teammate of David's. The boys had reported these allegations after attending religious camps. David claimed that the mother had made false allegations against him, and was given custody of his children by the court despite evidence of her wrongdoing. David and his sons were left to deal with the aftermath of these false allegations and abuse.
Discussing Child Welfare Camps and Lying to the Court David and Mark discussed the negative effects of withholding information and lying to the court, and the importance of taking an offensive stance against those who abuse the system. They also talked about the issue of child welfare camps, with Arizona and California being mentioned as states that have implemented them. The conversation indicated a growing momentum against these camps, with several states having already banned them. Then Mark and David also highlighted the brazenness and arrogance of those running these camps, expressing their belief that the truth will ultimately prevail.
Accountability, Parental Alienation, and Abuse Reports Mark proposed a plan to make individuals accountable for their actions, which included retroactive legislation for egregious cases. They discussed the issues surrounding parental alienation and the misuse of abuse reports in divorce cases.
The person on the other end of the call shared their personal experiences, highlighting how the system often favors the party with more financial resources and can be manipulated to make false allegations of abuse. They also noted that the accusations of parental alienation can be used to discredit the protective parent, even when there is clear evidence of abuse.
Child Abuse Cases and Legal Challenges Mark and David discussed the legal and social system's response to child abuse cases. The anonymous participant argued that the system often protects the abuser, allowing them to regain custody of the child and causing further trauma. They also mentioned the use of therapists and attorneys to manipulate the situation and gaslight the accused's partner. Mark agreed with this assessment, highlighting that the abuser is often allowed to financially drain the good parent's resources. Both parties acknowledged the challenges and potential outcomes of legal cases, noting that many families might not have the resources or willpower to pursue such cases.
Stopping Escalation, Accountability, and Charity Mark and David discussed their goal to stop a certain issue from escalating and their unwillingness to be intimidated. Mark emphasized the importance of accountability in the judicial system, a theme he had previously explored with Sherry Lund. A charity event was announced, with David's attendance and a pledge to remove judicial immunity, particularly in cases of flagrant lawbreaking. Both parties expressed their commitment to the cause and thanked each other for their cooperation.
Mark and Sherry Lund discussed the creation of a podcast focused on court reform and family issues, with Sherry sharing her personal experiences and advocating for better safeguards and accountability in the legal system.
They also criticized the criminal activities of the legal mafia, the lack of due process, and the impunity of judges and lawyers, emphasizing the need for significant changes in the system. The discussion also touched on the injustices caused by the legal system, the importance of legislative action to remove judicial immunity, and the challenges they faced in trying to expose and address these issues. A KidsMatter.charity Production
Episode Summary Sherry's Personal Experience With Court Reform
Mark and Sherry discussed their plans to create a podcast focused on court reform and family issues. Sherry shared her personal experiences as an advocate for family court victims, including her own legal battles with probate courts.
She described an emotionally charged situation where her stepdaughter fell ill, leading to a lengthy and contentious legal battle over her inheritance and accusations of misconduct against her family.
Sherry recounted how her family, with her husband's involvement, fought against a well-connected legal team and the accusations made against them. The legal team repeatedly served legal papers on her family, even on holidays, as part of their tactics to keep the case going.
Improving Estate Management and Conservatorships
Sherry shared her family's experience with the mismanagement of a loved one's estate and their subsequent legal struggles. She highlighted the need for better safeguards and advocated for a new bill that guarantees the right to an accounting of the estate and access for interested parties.
She also discussed her involvement with the Free Britney movement in California, highlighting the violations committed against Britney and the need for conservators to appoint their own attorneys. Sherry emphasized the importance of due process and the rights of the person of interest, even in probate cases involving minors' trusts. Mark agreed with Sherry's perspective, pointing out the potential for abuse when attorneys are appointed to take over trusts for minors.
Legal Mafia and Systemic Issues
Sherry and Mark discussed the criminal activities of the legal mafia, a highly organized crime syndicate operating under the color of law. They identified a significant issue within the legal system, where state court judges and actors do not always acknowledge federal law, leading to a lack of accountability.
Sherry also shared her family's experiences with the legal system, where her relative, Michelle, has been wrongfully accused and denied visitation, causing emotional distress. Sherry urged individuals not to use the court system to settle personal scores, as the innocent party is often the one who suffers most.
Judicial System Accountability and Impunity
Sherry and Mark discussed the issue of judges and lawyers acting with impunity and violating the rights of others. Sherry expressed her concern about the judicial system's inability to hold judges accountable for their actions, even when they break the law. They both criticized the system for its lack of due process and the complicity of certain individuals in maintaining a problematic situation.
They highlighted the double standard in the legal system where attorneys could lie in court but others had to prove the truth of their statements. They both agreed on the need for significant changes in the system and noted that any false statements made in court were protected activity.
Addressing Judges' Law Violations and Accountability
Sherry and Mark discussed the issue of judges violating the law and the lack of accountability for their actions. Sherry shared her efforts to address this issue, including reaching out to Senator Cavanaugh and working on a petition to choose the attorney for a trial by jury before a guardian or conservator is appointed.
Sherry also highlighted her work on a bill related to disability rights, which faced unexpected opposition from Judge Polks. The discussion also touched on the need for accountability in stakeholder meetings and Sherry proposed a thought experiment to emphasize the importance of accountability and address the growing frustration with judges.
Injustices in the Legal System Discussed
Sherry and Mark discussed the injustices and abuse caused by the legal system, specifically targeting families and children. Sherry shared her personal experiences and highlighted the devastating impact on families, including the loss of loved ones and the destruction of relationships.
Mark expressed his outrage and blamed the press for not exposing these issues more widely. Both were critical of the actions of lawyers and judges who they believed exploit vulnerable individuals for personal gain, and they expressed frustration at the lack of accountability in the system.
Critiquing the Court System and Judges
Sherry and Mark discussed the issues with the current state of the court system, particularly highlighting problems with judges and their decision-making processes. Sherry voiced her frustration about the lack of accountability and the need for impeachment, suggesting that outside investigations should be conducted by those with no connection to the court.
They also discussed the negative impact of court procedures on families and the importance of trying to resolve issues through communication and negotiation before involving the court. Mark agreed that the system is flawed and that judges often make decisions based on gut feelings rather than following the law.
Addressing Judicial Immunity and Accountability
Sherry and Mark discussed the issue of judicial immunity and lack of accountability in the legal system. Mark proposed organizing a charity fundraiser event on September 21, 2024 in Arizona to address this problem. Sherry expressed concern over criminal activities by some lawyers and judges. Both agreed on the need to abolish judicial immunity for greater accountability. Sherry shared her experience with her daughter's former attorney being investigated.
Addressing Unlicensed Psychiatrist Cases
Sherry and Mark discussed a case involving a judge who appointed an unlicensed psychiatrist to evaluate a child, disregarding the child's best interests. They expressed their frustration with the legal system's complicity in such cases and the challenges they faced in trying to expose and address these issues.
They also discussed the need for legislative action to remove judicial immunity and allow victims to seek justice. Mark emphasized that the legal establishment's resistance to change could only be overcome through direct pressure and public exposure.
Welcome to Divorce Matters, a podcast where we delve into the intricate and often misunderstood world of divorce, custody battles, and the legal system that navigates these turbulent waters. Today, we're unpacking a case that has captured national attention and sparked a significant conversation about the integrity of the family court system, the impact of false allegations in custody disputes, and the profound emotional toll these battles take on families. Our focus is on a landmark $21.3 million jury verdict awarded in a disputed Colorado custody case, a verdict that calls into question the actions of an ex-husband, the decisions of family court evaluators, and the rulings of a judge that led to a mother being barred from any contact with her children based on allegations now deemed to be falsely manipulated.
SPONSORED BY www.kidsmatter.charity WE'D LOVE YOUR DONATION
This case, stemming from Routt County, Colorado, involves Cynthia Hayek, a mother who lost all contact with her children due to her ex-husband Steven Herron's allegations that her new fiancé sexually abused one of their children. These allegations, which were later found to be part of a "false narrative" cultivated by Herron, led to a series of legal and child protective actions that isolated Hayek from her children and ultimately resulted in a jury finding Herron liable for defamation, conspiracy, outrageous conduct, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution. As we dive into the details of this case, we'll explore the implications of the jury's verdict, the systemic issues it highlights within the family court system, and the path forward for those seeking justice and reform in similar disputes. Join us as we navigate the complex, heart-wrenching, and ultimately hopeful journey of Cynthia Hayek and the broader lessons this case teaches us about the power of perseverance, the importance of truth, and the need for systemic change in our family courts.
Details
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant:
Cynthia Hayek, an individual
V.
Defendants/Counterclaimant/Third Party
Plaintiff:
Steven Herron, an individual; and Christine
Herron, an individual,
V.
Third Party Defendant:
Kenneth Wayne Hamp, an individual.
This case revolves around a deeply contentious and complex legal battle stemming from the divorce and subsequent disputes between Cynthia Hayek and Steven Herron, involving allegations of child abuse, manipulation, and emotional distress. After their divorce, Herron and Hayek became embroiled in a series of legal confrontations, with Herron accusing Hayek and her boyfriend, Kenneth Wayne Hamp, of various forms of abuse towards their children, leading to a series of investigations and legal claims. These allegations, which Hayek contends are entirely fabricated and part of a "False Narrative" created by Herron to gain an advantage in custody and parenting disputes, have led to a multifaceted legal battle involving claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, abuse of process, conspiracy, malicious prosecution, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The case highlights the severe personal and legal ramifications of such disputes, touching on the emotional toll on all parties involved, the impact on the children at the center of the allegations, and the broader implications for the legal and community systems navigating such deeply personal and contentious issues.
In light of the resolution of this contentious custody case, where a jury awarded $21.3 million in damages after finding that the ex-husband corruptly manipulated proceedings to gain full custody by falsely alleging abuse, here are revised questions reflecting the allegations and the jury award:
- Legal and Ethical Implications:
- "With a $21.3 million verdict against Steven Herron for defamation, conspiracy, outrageous conduct, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution, what message does this send about the use of false allegations in custody disputes?"
Join us as we delve into the harrowing story of a 61-year-old woman who fell victim to the corrupt family courts in San Diego, California. With two judges admitting to the falsification of a court judgment by her ex-husband, a CPA and forensic accountant who specializes in fraud, the courts have yet to take action and fix their error. Our podcast seeks to uncover the truth behind the injustice faced by countless families in the San Diego family court system and shed light on the need for change. About Karie Mcewen I am a 61-year-old woman who is the victim of the family courts in San Diego CA. Two judges, one being the Presiding Judge Michal T. Smyth have admitted that the court took a fake judgment that my ex-husband who is a CPA, a Forensic accountant specializing in fraud had submitted to the court and got a clerk to stamp it to make it appear real with the court's stamp on it. This Judgment did not show in the register of action. The Judge whose name is on the fake Judgment and the two attorneys whose names are on the fake Judgement have all said it never happened .
My ex-husband has walked away with all my retirement and has left me and my autistic son penniless. My question to the court is when the courts make a mistake who fixes it?
The court media person Emily Cox said Judge Michael T. Smyth sent this to the D.A.’s Office to be investigated in August 10, 2022 three days later the D.A.’s office said they did not have enough to prove my ex-husband who has worked with the DA's office on many cases and has been exonerated. The DA's office also ignored Judge Ratekin in 2019 who also sent this fake document and a fake wage assignment to have the D.A. to only be ignored. The courts have enough evidence to prove it did not happen. Two judges now have been sent the judgment and fake wage assignment to the D.A. 's office. To date 5 years have passed and the court still has not fixed the error.
There is no dispute of the validity that the Judgment was a fake and was never heard in front of a Judge and was never a court ruling. The courts have admitted in open court that the Judgment was fake, and the court clerk should not have stamped it.
I have the tape recording of the Judge saying it in court in 2019. I have spent thousands of dollars to have the court fix their error.
Who fixes a court error in Family court in San Diego? I still have not had one judge fix the court error and to date still am being held to this fake Judgment. The courts have delayed this case until October of 2024.
Due process is not a real thing in family court in San Diego.
In this podcast episode of "Divorce Matters," host Mark welcomes guest Ira Paskowitz, a law enforcement officer in South Florida, to discuss parental alienation and parental interference. Ira shares his personal experience dealing with family court and custody issues with his ex-girlfriend, who engaged in relentless parental alienation towards him and his family. Despite paying $1,100 a month in child support, he was denied visitation with his daughter. The conversation highlights the financial and emotional toll of these legal battles and the impact on children caught in the middle.
Guest Rhonda Noordyk
The "Divorce Matters" podcast episode features guest Rhonda Noordyk , founder and CEO of the Women's Financial Wellness Center, discussing seven ways to prepare for divorce. The host, Mark,, asks Noordyk's about common issues that lead to divorce, and Noordyk notes that infidelity, mental illness and abuse, and addiction are common factors. Noordyk also emphasizes the importance of one's partner making a sincere effort to change in order to avoid divorce.
Noordyk goes on to discuss the importance of financial preparedness in divorce, as well as seeking out emotional support and being realistic about what to expect in the legal process. She also stresses the need to have a clear understanding of one's own values and priorities, in order to make informed decisions throughout the divorce process.
The host and guest also touch on the emotional toll of divorce and the importance of self-care during this difficult time. Noordyk emphasizes the need to prioritize self-care in order to stay emotionally healthy and to make clear-headed decisions.
Overall, the episode offers practical advice for anyone going through a divorce, with an emphasis on financial and emotional preparedness. Noordyk's insights and advice can help listeners make informed decisions throughout the divorce process, and help them emerge from the experience with their financial and emotional well-being intact.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
Guest Rhonda Noordyk
The "Divorce Matters" podcast episode features guest Rhonda Noordyk , founder and CEO of the Women's Financial Wellness Center, discussing seven ways to prepare for divorce. The host, Mark,, asks Noordyk's about common issues that lead to divorce, and Noordyk notes that infidelity, mental illness and abuse, and addiction are common factors. Noordyk also emphasizes the importance of one's partner making a sincere effort to change in order to avoid divorce.
Noordyk goes on to discuss the importance of financial preparedness in divorce, as well as seeking out emotional support and being realistic about what to expect in the legal process. She also stresses the need to have a clear understanding of one's own values and priorities, in order to make informed decisions throughout the divorce process.
The host and guest also touch on the emotional toll of divorce and the importance of self-care during this difficult time. Noordyk emphasizes the need to prioritize self-care in order to stay emotionally healthy and to make clear-headed decisions.
Overall, the episode offers practical advice for anyone going through a divorce, with an emphasis on financial and emotional preparedness. Noordyk's insights and advice can help listeners make informed decisions throughout the divorce process, and help them emerge from the experience with their financial and emotional well-being intact.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
In this heart-wrenching episode of our podcast, we speak with a father whose children were taken away by CPS under suspicious circumstances. He shares his story of how their happy family life was suddenly shattered, and how he's fighting tirelessly to get his children back. With firsthand accounts from the father and a look at the evidence that led to the removal of their kids, we delve into the complex world of child protection services and the impact it can have on innocent families. This is a story of resilience, hope, and the power of a father's love. And we also discuss how to avoid the same situation if you ever get into one.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
Join legal experts Lisa Johnson and Chris Barry in this episode as they discuss the abusive nature of family court systems. With firsthand experience dealing with clients across the world, they share their perspectives on the corruption and cronyism within the industry that leads to extreme cases of high-conflict divorce. Tune in to learn about the challenges faced by good parents and the problems with the current court system that prioritizes money over the well-being of children.
So let's jump right in now, though. Lisa, you were in Connecticut. Is that correct? Is that the court system that you're in? And then Chris, where were you? New York only? Okay, so you guys have got a northeast perspective, which isn't too far off from California.
I think they share a lot of things. Whereas other parts of the country can be quite different actually. Yeah, but I would. I would agree that the family court system is quite abusive, I actually think they encourage it. And I'm not talking everybody everyone knows I have an asterisk next to most things I say, because I've met some good judges. But they're the exception, not the rule. But I feel like most courts are have been developed. A family courts have been developed to encourage this type of behavior because their friends get richer off of it. And again, not every judge but I feel like most of the stuff could be shut down very quickly. And most of these things can be resolved in a room or in two or three days. But they're not but because of all the money involved. So either one of you chime in where am i right? Or am I wrong? Okay, well, we have this weekly legal abuse support group, we meet on Sundays for about an hour and a half over zoom with clients from all over the world, different laws, same issues, everywhere that we know of that speaks English, where we have clients. And we say that divorce is a tremendous money making industry. And that it's not just you and your difficult ex, but they're actively participating in keeping these things going these high conflict cases and everybody benefits, except you and your children. And so, Chris, why do you think that is? Do you think these people are truly evil? Do you think like, they're just trying to attract money? Or the pirates? What are they? So I think, I think maybe calling them evil is a little bit of a stretch, maybe? Certainly, there are some evil ones out there. But I think so there's a couple of different contributing factors. One is, there's ignorance, right, because most people enter the court system in a divorce, they're angry, there's a reason they never got married, thinking we're when we get divorced, this is how it will be they don't intend to get divorced. So something happened and it got bad enough that they ended the relationship. And sometimes, you know, if their kids involved, they really really didn't want to end it. But it got so bad that they had to so people start off angry. But usually, you know, after a year or nine months, year, year and a half, most rational people calm down. So when what the case is, at least I deal with, there's something going on with our clients, former former partner, where you know, it's a like a mental health issue, whether it's narcissism or borderline, you know, we're not psychologists, we're not qualified to, to diagnose anyone, we look at the behaviors. And it's amazing how consistent the behaviors are, you know, we don't need a label, we look at the behaviors. So that's, that's the biggest factor in the ones that we deal with, we deal with the 5% were that people never the other spouse never comes down. Their anger never subsides, they act irrationally, they spend way more, you know, at least we'll talk about her case, but they spend way more on attorneys fees than if they just reached a reasonable settlement to begin with. So that's that's one. That's the biggest one for us. That the courts don't understand that stuff. It doesn't always take two to tango. Let me challenge you on something. What do you mean, the courts don't understand that you don't think they understand what's going on? They don't they look at these high conflict, generally speaking, okay. You know, not in every case. But generally speaking, they look at when two people are fighting, they can't settle. That it's both their fault. They're both the you know, the term is mutual combat. Yeah. You know, or takes two to tango is another thing that people say all the time. They're not sophistic judges, you're so overloaded with it with cases, they just want you out of their your business transaction to them. Right, so why won't you settle and they get angry at both parties, without having the time or the expertise to like dig deep into what's going on. Also, you know, the toxic personalities, which I know this isn't about toxic personalities. But those people there, they're really, really persuasive. They're manipulative, they've been practicing it for really their entire adult lives. So they go in there and they spin these fantastic lies, and distractions, all kinds of stuff. The other issue though, is because I know I'm going on with this response. A big part of it also, is this sort of this cronyism system that's grown up around divorce. So whether it be parenting, you know, custody evaluators, parenting coordinators, guardian ad litem, or as we call them in, in New York attorneys for the children.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to HTTP://www.KidsMatter.charity
Where are we with the Robert Emert case? A lot of you have been emailing and calling and all that. So he's still in jail. Unfortunately, if you don't recall, we had a, a podcast about this thing a few episodes ago. And because he's still in jail, literally for ridiculous reasons. Things that I believe were either made up by the DEA or exaggerated. In order to teach Ron the lesson, he filed a federal lawsuit. This is a title 42 USC 9083, which is essentially a federal lawsuit used against people that are violating his civil rights under color of law. And he named nine defendants because you can't sue the state, typically, unless they violate your ADEA, which are Americans with disabilities. And they did. So in part, he sued a state actor, I don't believe he sued a state. But he didn't sue nine people in total that were violating his civil rights, including the DEA investigator, Luis Pena, here in San Diego, who I believe was the one that was behind this with another woman that's in the DHS office, just basically a travesty. And these are the things that the people have to rise up and demand change. Because if you can throw a dad in jail, who was for all intents and purposes, one of the best dads of the year, he just got angry with the courts who were trying to take his son away from them and put them put him in the home. So now, we're in a situation where he's got a federal lawsuit, which they've got 21 days to respond. I think that was from February 7. So we'll get back on at the end of the month and talk to you about what happened there. We just witnessed a preliminary hearing, I believe it was yesterday where they presented their evidence. And I can tell you, I was looking at the DA was looking at Louis Pena, these people are nervous. Her hand was shaking, and she was reading from it because they know this is a fraud. It's BS, what they're trying to do. And if they win, and they set precedents here, then if you miss, or if you have an infraction of any sort, and they deem you, as someone that they don't like, then hey, you could be arrested without bail. It's insane. And they know it.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
https://kidsmatter.charity/campaigns/kids-matter-donate/donate/
Guest: Shawn A. McMillan
We discuss all issues CPS - this is a must listen podcast if you are being impacted by CPS. Shawn has won nearly $10m in CPS lawsuits.
Things Shawn and I Discuss:
- CPS rule: “No finding no funding”
- How to sue CPS
- What mistakes CPS must make in order to get around their immunity
- Is there an incentive system in State and Federal – walk us through the CPS process
- What’s your best defense when accused?
- How do you get around their qualified immunity privilege
- Cops have lost some of their immunity, why hasn't CPS?
- Did CPS really believe they has a right to lie? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_8-8IZLP4w Teh Right to Lie case
- TransparentCalifornia.org
- Why isn’t the press getting involved.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
Guest: Shawn A. McMillan
We discuss all issues CPS - this is a must listen podcast if you are being impacted by CPS.
Things Shawn and I Discuss:
- CPS rule: “No finding no funding”
- How to sue CPS
- What mistakes CPS must make in order to get around their immunity
- Is there an incentive system in State and Federal – walk us through the CPS process
- What’s your best defense when accused?
- How do you get around their qualified immunity privilege
- Cops have lost some of their immunity, why hasn't CPS?
- Did CPS really believe they has a right to lie? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_8-8IZLP4w Teh Right to Lie case
- TransparentCalifornia.org
- Why isn’t the press getting involved.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
The San Diego District Attorney Luis Pena and Judge Kimberlee Lagotta are responsible for this fiasco. https://ballotpedia.org/Kimberlee_Lagotta
These two charlatans conspired to arrest a very respectable dad and issue a protective warrant on his 15-year-old son. Why? for parental abduction, but they made it look like a kidnapping so that NO BAIL was set. No bail is given to murderers and repeat offenders not dad's. The fact is, I know Bryce and Rob. Bryce CHOSE to live with Robert. Yes there was a court order for Bryce to live with mom, but it was based on a fraud upon the court and a commissioner that endorsed that fraud, Commissioner Patt Ratekin. We've had a lot of complaints about Ms. Ratekin, her actions are very concerning. Want to donate to help Rob and Bryce? www.kidsmatter.charity
Today we discuss the importance of "In re Marriage of Prentis-Margulis & Margulis" Which discusses the fiduciary responsibility of spouses not to hide assets and the ramifications if they do. We get into Family Code 721, 1100, 1101 and some corporation code (yes spouses do fall under these codes as well).
Join Mark Esquibel, Michael Alexander and myself as we discuss this.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
Guest Mark Esquibel and I break down the Child Protective Case Wallis v. Spencer, 202 F.3d 1126, 1130 (9th Cir. 1999) and how it applies to a case in Los Angeles.
If CPS has taken your kids, this is a must-listen podcast.
Cases Cited
Write to Lie case
https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dd_8-8IZLP4w%26fbclid%3DIwAR3yO0zfHyDEZpcuIkXXyVlJKjdlSDBBdVmPxs6FjhQP2TsP773VtBVbkkQ&h=AT1nPGryyIGLi5FpxtryUJWVJRoeUygX_MgAmG677zuPawqtanUIJ-LSgds7RujjzzFvGZjxU_LPTOoppHw-5ajgHxa22sxTUcNtgbqdr8CFMBDoV19e2fqo45B0JuP1mws
Case Law - Wallis versus Spencer https://casetext.com/case/wallis-v-spencer?fbclid=IwAR1ahbfePU4uxQhuFNpyTY-fAqxbkJyBs79AQoe4nXOZQHo40dCG5ACP7DA
Dr. Charles Sophy – Starting at minute 24
https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fm.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DVxhREF0u1t8%26feature%3Dyoutu.be%26fbclid%3DIwAR1yVBoP1KQaNFYtzZmPnDmbHeIumT1oww7G8D2rX_Yzx-hPN-O0DOWlyhM&h=AT1nPGryyIGLi5FpxtryUJWVJRoeUygX_MgAmG677zuPawqtanUIJ-LSgds7RujjzzFvGZjxU_LPTOoppHw-5ajgHxa22sxTUcNtgbqdr8CFMBDoV19e2fqo45B0JuP1mws
Sean McMIllian is the Attorney on the LA Case
Wallis v. Spencer, 202 F.3d 1126, 1130 (9th Cir. 1999) (“Because the swing of every pendulum brings with it potential adverse consequences, it is important to emphasize that in the area of child abuse, as with the investigation and prosecution of all crimes, the state is constrained by the substantive and procedural guarantees of the Constitution. The fact that the suspected crime may be heinous — whether it involves children or adults — does not provide cause for the state to ignore the rights of the accused or any other parties.”)
Wallis v. Spencer, 202 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir. 1999) (“ Escondido police officers, evidently acting on the basis of a non-existent court order, seized the children, aged two and five, placed them in a county-run institution, and several days later, without obtaining judicial authorization and without notifying their parents, took them to a hospital for the performance of highly intrusive anal and vaginal physical examinations. The children were not returned to their parents for approximately two and one-half months. All of this occurred after a mental patient who had a long history of delusional disorders and was confined to a mental institution told her therapist a fantastic tale of Satanic witchcraft within her family and an impending child sacrifice. T”)
The district court initially granted the City's motion for summary judgment on the erroneous theory that the action was collaterally estopped by a preliminary ruling of the juvenile court referee, and we reversed. Subsequently, the district court again granted the City summary judgment, this time on the merits. Again, we reverse.
Ben Schooley is a Pro Se coach. Listen to what he went through before taking his own case over.
Partial Transcripts
Hello, everyone, welcome to divorce matters. Joining me today is Ben Schooley. He's a pro se coach, and he knows a lot about family law. So I thought what a perfect person to have on the show. Because he's been there done that. And we always love those types of people. So before we jump in, Ben, can you kind of give us your background how you got into this, and we'll take it from there.
You're talking about like, like for damages? Yeah. No, I mean, no, I have no, my deal is over done with I mean, my life has moved forward. And it is what it is, and it's gonna finish out the way it's gonna finish out. I've been talking with a lot of people about loss of consortium, which if you don't know what that is, is like, when you and your spouse are driving in a car and an 18 Wheeler hits you and kills your spouse, then the personal injury attorneys will sue on loss of consortium, which has got no monetary limit. And that goes after their insurance policy, which is the loss of consortium is a loss of the relationship that I would have had without your interference. And so I've been trying to encourage somebody to kind of pick up that football enrollment loss of consortium in a civil family law situation as you know, you, you lied. I proved that ultimately, it took me five years to do it. I mean, but You wrecked my relationship with my child. And I leave $10 million, because I think that would set such a precedent for damages and for process in case law. But today, it hasn't happened. I keep hoping that somebody will kind of pick up that football run with it. Yeah.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
Today I discuss a case in Washington where a judge will not recuse himself despite mountains of evidence against him.
Predrag has tried everything but to no avail. Learn what I would do in his situation.
About our Guest Predrag Tosic
"My name is very South-Slavic. Both my first and last names are unique to the former
Yugoslavia. I was born and raised in Belgrade. What was Yugoslavia at the time, and is today
the capital of Serbia. And you know I've been in this country [the US] for about 30 years now,
ever since my undergraduate college. I lived in about eight different states, moving around a
lot especially between 2006 when I got my PhD and 2015. I also used to live and work in your
state of California, in Silicon Valley. I also lived in Maryland, Illinois, Texas, Idaho and different
parts of Washington state. My graduate school was where I spent the longest, almost 10
years; I have three degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. And then
since about 2015, I've been living in the Pacific Northwest, mostly in Washington State and
also briefly Idaho. And this is where I got married. A blunder as it turned out if you are
heterosexual male, given the massive gender-bias in Washington state when it comes to
divorce/custody, but especially when it comes to DV (domestic violence). My daughter Mira
was born in Pullman, Washington in the early 2017. Her mother, my ex-wife, is a greater
Seattle native. When Mira was a baby, her mother she literally took off with the kid and moved
some 300 miles across the state, against my will. It was a book-example of parental
abduction, however I made a mistake not treating it as such from the get-go, naively fooling
myself it was “just post partum” rather than a premeditated action. Then-wife played games
about coming back or not coming back to where the child was born and where I still lived.
Then, prior to even establishing a proper residence there, later in 2017 she files for divorce in
Seattle, King County, which is the worst for fathers in divorce and child custody, together with
Pierce County (just south of King; where the city of Tacoma is located). The entire state of
Washington is very bad for fathers, but these two counties (in the uber-woke, de facto one-
party ruled western Washington state) are the worst. King County should have never been the
proper venue for either divorce or child custody litigation. The gender based discrimination in
western Washington is rampant. Family court corruption is rampant. These people are just
looking to line up their pockets and pockets of their buddies among greedy lawyers, various
“evaluators” and fake experts, and the like. The Constitution and one’s protected rights are
blatantly and knowingly violated, whereas the well-being, let alone actual best interest, of the
children involved in this quagmire are but a buzzword used by the abusive, corrupt family
court judges, but in reality aren’t even an afterthought to those same judges and various
“children’s advocates” who are destroying families and (usually) making children fatherless or
nearly-fatherless for profits. It’s beyond corrupt and is indeed truly sick; I believe, based on
my experience and what I know of other fathers’ experiences in the state of Washington, that
these so-called “family courts” are so bad, corrupt and lawless, they are already beyond
redemption or being “reformable”; they should be abolished altogether, as the amount of harm
they cause is truly astounding!
Divorce Matters Actual podcast
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/divorce-matters/id1545876069
Divorce Matters
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
Keywords
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
https://kidsmatter.charity/campaigns/kids-matter-donate/donate/
Today I discuss a case in Washington where a judge will not recuse himself despite mountains of evidence against him.
Predrag has tried everything but to no avail. Learn what I would do in his situation.
About our Guest Predrag Tosic
"My name is very South-Slavic. Both my first and last names are unique to the former
Yugoslavia. I was born and raised in Belgrade. What was Yugoslavia at the time, and is today
the capital of Serbia. And you know I've been in this country [the US] for about 30 years now,
ever since my undergraduate college. I lived in about eight different states, moving around a
lot especially between 2006 when I got my PhD and 2015. I also used to live and work in your
state of California, in Silicon Valley. I also lived in Maryland, Illinois, Texas, Idaho and different
parts of Washington state. My graduate school was where I spent the longest, almost 10
years; I have three degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. And then
since about 2015, I've been living in the Pacific Northwest, mostly in Washington State and
also briefly Idaho. And this is where I got married. A blunder as it turned out if you are
heterosexual male, given the massive gender-bias in Washington state when it comes to
divorce/custody, but especially when it comes to DV (domestic violence). My daughter Mira
was born in Pullman, Washington in the early 2017. Her mother, my ex-wife, is a greater
Seattle native. When Mira was a baby, her mother she literally took off with the kid and moved
some 300 miles across the state, against my will. It was a book-example of parental
abduction, however I made a mistake not treating it as such from the get-go, naively fooling
myself it was “just post partum” rather than a premeditated action. Then-wife played games
about coming back or not coming back to where the child was born and where I still lived.
Then, prior to even establishing a proper residence there, later in 2017 she files for divorce in
Seattle, King County, which is the worst for fathers in divorce and child custody, together with
Pierce County (just south of King; where the city of Tacoma is located). The entire state of
Washington is very bad for fathers, but these two counties (in the uber-woke, de facto one-
party ruled western Washington state) are the worst. King County should have never been the
proper venue for either divorce or child custody litigation. The gender based discrimination in
western Washington is rampant. Family court corruption is rampant. These people are just
looking to line up their pockets and pockets of their buddies among greedy lawyers, various
“evaluators” and fake experts, and the like. The Constitution and one’s protected rights are
blatantly and knowingly violated, whereas the well-being, let alone actual best interest, of the
children involved in this quagmire are but a buzzword used by the abusive, corrupt family
court judges, but in reality aren’t even an afterthought to those same judges and various
“children’s advocates” who are destroying families and (usually) making children fatherless or
nearly-fatherless for profits. It’s beyond corrupt and is indeed truly sick; I believe, based on
my experience and what I know of other fathers’ experiences in the state of Washington, that
these so-called “family courts” are so bad, corrupt and lawless, they are already beyond
redemption or being “reformable”; they should be abolished altogether, as the amount of harm
they cause is truly astounding!
Divorce Matters Actual podcast
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/divorce-matters/id1545876069
Divorce Matters
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
Keywords
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
https://kidsmatter.charity/campaigns/kids-matter-donate/donate/
Today we will show you how to legally complain and remove a judge. The system has made it difficult, but Angel breaks down how to do it properly.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
https://kidsmatter.charity/campaigns/kids-matter-donate/donate/
Transcript:
We have a returning guest Angel law. That's a pseudonym because she's so mixed up in so many cases. But she's here to explain something that I have a lot of interest in. And I'm sure a lot of you will, and that is how to properly complain and get your judges or attorneys in trouble for violating your rights or the law, or the million other things that they do so with that. Angel, let's talk about what it is that you've done and what you've figured out and what a lot of people don't know just an overview.
Right. So what has recently happened was, I was a unique case, where I was able to remove a judge from my own matter by filing a motion to disqualify the judge based upon the judges. very terrible conduct. And this is the most difficult way to remove a judge. And it's fraught with obstacles, and it's something you wouldn't want to do. But in the course of figuring that out. Prior to asking the judge to remove himself because of his misconduct, I can first started off with making a complaint to the presiding judge of my courthouse. And this is really important because you can usually obtain a form by contacting the clerk of your court. And there's an official form that you can even fill out in handwriting. It's about two pages long so special complaint to the presiding judge and you send it in. The presiding judge has 30 days to respond, and they must respond within 30 days. Notice it's something I was looking for be a wonderful tool for all of us if we flood the court. And we drive the presiding judges into having an answer for the accordance conduct of their subordinate judges. We could maybe let them know hey, we know that you guys aren't supposed to be doing this. And Mr. Presiding or Mrs. Presiding Judge. You have an administrative and supervision advisory duty to do something about that. And maybe at least it's you know, just because they're they don't want to do the work. They might say to their subordinate judges. Hey, knock this off. I've got too many complaints to respond to so step number one, when you got to an awful judge is preparing to remove them with either a one or a coordinated effort where you're going to complain to the presiding and then you're going to complain to the BJP. But you don't want to complain.
You thought though, I would just interject that doing it. This way to remove the judges is a lot harder than just go into 171 one 70.11 7.3 Or one 70.6 If you haven't recused anyone yet, right?
And I, you know, in my experience, when I read the California Code of Civil Procedure, and this is not legal advice, this is my personal experience. I had a conversation with an appellate attorney, and a one 70.6 is a peremptory challenge. That means within 10 days of being appointed, a new judge, like your case is assigned to a new judicial officer. You're supposed to have 10 days and you left to complete your motion to challenge that judge and have an offense. Basically,
Tim Schilling, parental rights advocate in Pennsylvania. I started my horrifying nightmare in December of 2013. And just like everybody else around the United States, I filed for divorce, custody, equable distribution, and during this time, I went through nine different attorneys.
I lost everything I was homeless. I was parentally alienated from my daughter for about three and a half, maybe four years. And they was just attacking me from every which side I was in nine different cases and
A reminder that we are not attorneys. And this is not legal advice.
However, we will help you more than any attorney ever will.
And now here's your hosts, Michael Alexander and Mark Fidelman.
Hello, everyone, welcome to divorce matters. Oh my god, you know who's back? Michael Alexander. I can't believe it. He's finally decided to come out of this retirement and do another show.
And his name is on the freakin headline. So I'm glad to have you back. Michael. We have a very special show today. A lot of you are going to want to hear this. It is about recusing a judge we have found another tactic. Again, I want to say only recuse bad judges, you can't be using this to recuse somebody that's ruling fairly that you don't like because you're the problem has to be a bad judge that does bad things. So with that said,
Michael, welcome back to the show. Thank you. Pleasure to not see you again.
And we also have a special guest. We're gonna call her Angel law today because we don't want her to be inundated with requests for her to help you. She's not an attorney, she is in an attorney's firm, same one that I'm associated with, but neither one of us are attorney. So this isn't legal advice. We're just going to talk about her case. And,
well, Angel, why don't you introduce yourself real quick. Thank you so much for the very warm introduction. I am a litigant, a survivor of victim and now warrior of the family court system. So I am no different than every person listening to my voice right now. I am in your shoes, I was in your shoes, you might be somewhere different on the journey. I am a proud mother of three wonderful children. And we have endured nine years of a an amoral court system. I've seen the worst of the worst in my case and in many others. And I feel joyful and privileged to be here today to give some good news. I guess I could describe myself as the court Houdini, but I am still inside of there nine years later without ever having had a trial. All that being said, I have successfully removed a 730 custody evaluator for my case, I have successfully removed a therapist, I have successfully removed a parenting plan coordinator and all the other cottage industry charlatans. Perhaps my golden star came when a corrupt bag of puke minors counsel was appointed to my case over my objection. And the miners Council refused to take the case because of my name being involved. And all of this culminated to the final removal of a very, very, very bad judge. So without further ado, that's kind of my resume. My experience of the Family Court. All right, so let me summarize. Summarize it real quick. You haven't had a trial, it's been nine years, you've had a lot of bad actors, which we all know, are part of the system to extract as much money out of you as possible. It's not going to be in everyone's case. But I think the majority of cases I've seen, this is what's going on, you figure out how to remove all of them. You had one thorn in your side, which was a bad judge, how long was that bad judge part of your case? Well, Mark, it's really good and important question.
My matter had been in front of one very corrupt judge for eight years, I did not know how to get rid of him. And the one 170.1 motion that I'm about to describe that I used with the new judge would not have worked once I had a judge on for many years, but we'll touch upon alternate
Sponsored by Kids Matter www.kidsmatter.charity donate to give kids a voice in divorce
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.u
A reminder that we are not attorneys. And this is not legal advice.
However, we will help you more than any attorney ever will.
And now here's your hosts, Michael Alexander and Mark Fidelman.
Hello, everyone, welcome to divorce matters. Oh my god, you know who's back? Michael Alexander. I can't believe it. He's finally decided to come out of this retirement and do another show.
And his name is on the freakin headline. So I'm glad to have you back. Michael. We have a very special show today. A lot of you are going to want to hear this. It is about recusing a judge we have found another tactic. Again, I want to say only recuse bad judges, you can't be using this to recuse somebody that's ruling fairly that you don't like because you're the problem has to be a bad judge that does bad things. So with that said,
Michael, welcome back to the show. Thank you. Pleasure to not see you again.
And we also have a special guest. We're gonna call her Angel law today because we don't want her to be inundated with requests for her to help you. She's not an attorney, she is in an attorney's firm, same one that I'm associated with, but neither one of us are attorney. So this isn't legal advice. We're just going to talk about her case. And,
well, Angel, why don't you introduce yourself real quick. Thank you so much for the very warm introduction. I am a litigant, a survivor of victim and now warrior of the family court system. So I am no different than every person listening to my voice right now. I am in your shoes, I was in your shoes, you might be somewhere different on the journey. I am a proud mother of three wonderful children. And we have endured nine years of a an amoral court system. I've seen the worst of the worst in my case and in many others. And I feel joyful and privileged to be here today to give some good news. I guess I could describe myself as the court Houdini, but I am still inside of there nine years later without ever having had a trial. All that being said, I have successfully removed a 730 custody evaluator for my case, I have successfully removed a therapist, I have successfully removed a parenting plan coordinator and all the other cottage industry charlatans. Perhaps my golden star came when a corrupt bag of puke minors counsel was appointed to my case over my objection. And the miners Council refused to take the case because of my name being involved. And all of this culminated to the final removal of a very, very, very bad judge. So without further ado, that's kind of my resume. My experience of the Family Court. All right, so let me summarize. Summarize it real quick. You haven't had a trial, it's been nine years, you've had a lot of bad actors, which we all know, are part of the system to extract as much money out of you as possible. It's not going to be in everyone's case. But I think the majority of cases I've seen, this is what's going on, you figure out how to remove all of them. You had one thorn in your side, which was a bad judge, how long was that bad judge part of your case? Well, Mark, it's really good and important question.
My matter had been in front of one very corrupt judge for eight years, I did not know how to get rid of him. And the one 170.1 motion that I'm about to describe that I used with the new judge would not have worked once I had a judge on for many years, but we'll touch upon alternate
Sponsored by Kids Matter www.kidsmatter.charity donate to give kids a voice in divorce
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.u
A reminder that we are not attorneys. And this is not legal advice.
However, we will help you more than any attorney ever will.
And now here's your hosts, Michael Alexander and Mark Fidelman.
Hello, everyone, welcome to divorce matters. Oh my god, you know who's back? Michael Alexander. I can't believe it. He's finally decided to come out of this retirement and do another show.
And his name is on the freakin headline. So I'm glad to have you back. Michael. We have a very special show today. A lot of you are going to want to hear this. It is about recusing a judge we have found another tactic. Again, I want to say only recuse bad judges, you can't be using this to recuse somebody that's ruling fairly that you don't like because you're the problem has to be a bad judge that does bad things. So with that said,
Michael, welcome back to the show. Thank you. Pleasure to not see you again.
And we also have a special guest. We're gonna call her Angel law today because we don't want her to be inundated with requests for her to help you. She's not an attorney, she is in an attorney's firm, same one that I'm associated with, but neither one of us are attorney. So this isn't legal advice. We're just going to talk about her case. And,
well, Angel, why don't you introduce yourself real quick. Thank you so much for the very warm introduction. I am a litigant, a survivor of victim and now warrior of the family court system. So I am no different than every person listening to my voice right now. I am in your shoes, I was in your shoes, you might be somewhere different on the journey. I am a proud mother of three wonderful children. And we have endured nine years of a an amoral court system. I've seen the worst of the worst in my case and in many others. And I feel joyful and privileged to be here today to give some good news. I guess I could describe myself as the court Houdini, but I am still inside of there nine years later without ever having had a trial. All that being said, I have successfully removed a 730 custody evaluator for my case, I have successfully removed a therapist, I have successfully removed a parenting plan coordinator and all the other cottage industry charlatans. Perhaps my golden star came when a corrupt bag of puke minors counsel was appointed to my case over my objection. And the miners Council refused to take the case because of my name being involved. And all of this culminated to the final removal of a very, very, very bad judge. So without further ado, that's kind of my resume. My experience of the Family Court. All right, so let me summarize. Summarize it real quick. You haven't had a trial, it's been nine years, you've had a lot of bad actors, which we all know, are part of the system to extract as much money out of you as possible. It's not going to be in everyone's case. But I think the majority of cases I've seen, this is what's going on, you figure out how to remove all of them. You had one thorn in your side, which was a bad judge, how long was that bad judge part of your case? Well, Mark, it's really good and important question.
My matter had been in front of one very corrupt judge for eight years, I did not know how to get rid of him. And the one 170.1 motion that I'm about to describe that I used with the new judge would not have worked once I had a judge on for many years, but we'll touch upon alternate
Sponsored by Kids Matter www.kidsmatter.charity donate to give kids a voice in divorce
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.u
Joining me is Ted Hildago. Very similar case to Jeffrey Younger, I think this one's actually more advanced. We want to get into the politics of transgender in divorce situations with kids when they're not a kid. That's a different story. But when they're kids, I find that parents are losing their rights.
Learn how this father lost the rights to his son after a judge (who didn't disclose that she had a transgender child) ruled against him
Judge Joni Hiramoto https://www.linkedin.com/in/joni-hiramoto-69755711/
Joining me is Ted Hildago. Very similar case to Jeffrey Younger, I think this one's actually more advanced. We want to get into the politics of transgender in divorce situations with kids when they're not a kid. That's a different story. But when they're kids, I find that parents are losing their rights.
Learn how this father lost the rights to his son after a judge (who didn't disclose that she had a transgender child) ruled against him
Judge Joni Hiramoto https://www.linkedin.com/in/joni-hiramoto-69755711/
Wait until you hear this international case of family court shenanigans. Grab your best headphones and take listen.
Yeah, my name is Van Miller. I am by background. I'm a film and TV professional. I've produced television shows. And I also do investigative journalism on the side in order to expose the corruption of all kinds.
Well, you know, the family courts, you know, I just don't mince words with family court too much anymore, because, in my opinion, it's a wholly unlawful criminal operation that destroys families. I don't think there's anything lawful about the way things are done in family court. And one of my agendas is to not only bring attention to what's going on, and also to reform the family courts, because right now, as it stands, Family Court is nothing but a completely destructive operation that traumatizes children separates families. And it has to totally be in my opinion, it has to be not not just reformed, I mean, it has to be rebuilt from scratch, because it is a completely destructive operation, in my opinion.
Get ahold of Vem at VemMiller@protonmail.com.
Guest William Dubree
Schedule a call with William: It's www.hopeindarkness.me/appointment.htm
Hello, everyone, welcome to divorce matters. Today, I have a very special guests. I know they're all special. But this is very unique, bangle, special, especially to anyone interested in parental alienation and how to, let's just say rget your kids back. And these guys have done some pretty amazing things. And we're gonna get into that in just a second.
Dubree's Background:
I've been in the field of experimental psychology for 50 years. I'm a specialist in the area of learning theory applications to human behavior. And I have been involved almost exclusively in working to create a solution that is the polar opposite of what is being done today, or last 40 years in the family courts to solve the issues of children who have been abused in such a way that they reject contact with another parent.
HTTP://www.kidsmatter.charity
Support for this podcast comes from Kids Matter dot charity, a nonprofit dedicated to fighting for kids rights in difficult divorce situations donate at Kids Matter dot charity to help them restore common sense to the family courts. Thanks again for tuning in a reminder that we are not attorneys and this is not legal advice. We advise you do the research yourself or to contact an attorney trust. There are very few of them. This was divorce matters podcast
Does Civil Disobedience in Family Court work?
Rob Emert did it - here's what happened
Excerpt: "This is really what the very beginning where I really didn't know anything and I was just trying to get through the process and I was wishing that we could just you know of course have the whole divorce as be done and and I was making offers left and right but that again, that's here nor there at this point, but I was I just didn't realize I was walking into a mess. And I was walking into really when I look in retrospect, it was a sucker punch trap. And everybody knew that was going on in the divorce pretty much except me. And so back to you know, back to the peremptory challenge. So Commissioner comes in. We stipulate but then I talked to somebody at the facilitator's office, at the courthouse, and they told me basically look, you can still use your peremptory challenge because no orders were made. And so I found the peremptory challenge and this is warning bill number one, basically Commissioner Patty Radek, and even though I requested her to remove herself, using my peremptory challenge, she still stayed on the case. That you know, that was concerning right there. At that point, I didn't know that her supervising boss, her supervising judge was friends and work has worked with my ex wife for years. So again, I found that out much later..."
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to HTTP://www.KidsMatter.charity
Does Civil Disobedience in Family Court work?
Rob Emert did it - here's what happened
Excerpt: "This is really what the very beginning where I really didn't know anything and I was just trying to get through the process and I was wishing that we could just you know of course have the whole divorce as be done and and I was making offers left and right but that again, that's here nor there at this point, but I was I just didn't realize I was walking into a mess. And I was walking into really when I look in retrospect, it was a sucker punch trap. And everybody knew that was going on in the divorce pretty much except me. And so back to you know, back to the peremptory challenge. So Commissioner comes in. We stipulate but then I talked to somebody at the facilitator's office, at the courthouse, and they told me basically look, you can still use your peremptory challenge because no orders were made. And so I found the peremptory challenge and this is warning bill number one, basically Commissioner Patty Radek, and even though I requested her to remove herself, using my peremptory challenge, she still stayed on the case. That you know, that was concerning right there. At that point, I didn't know that her supervising boss, her supervising judge was friends and work has worked with my ex wife for years. So again, I found that out much later..."
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to HTTP://www.KidsMatter.charity
Does Civil Disobedience in Family Court work?
Rob Emert did it - here's what happened
Excerpt: "This is really what the very beginning where I really didn't know anything and I was just trying to get through the process and I was wishing that we could just you know of course have the whole divorce as be done and and I was making offers left and right but that again, that's here nor there at this point, but I was I just didn't realize I was walking into a mess. And I was walking into really when I look in retrospect, it was a sucker punch trap. And everybody knew that was going on in the divorce pretty much except me. And so back to you know, back to the peremptory challenge. So Commissioner comes in. We stipulate but then I talked to somebody at the facilitator's office, at the courthouse, and they told me basically look, you can still use your peremptory challenge because no orders were made. And so I found the peremptory challenge and this is warning bill number one, basically Commissioner Patty Radek, and even though I requested her to remove herself, using my peremptory challenge, she still stayed on the case. That you know, that was concerning right there. At that point, I didn't know that her supervising boss, her supervising judge was friends and work has worked with my ex wife for years. So again, I found that out much later..."
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to HTTP://www.KidsMatter.charity
Does Civil Disobedience in Family Court work?
Rob Emert did it - here's what happened
Excerpt: "This is really what the very beginning where I really didn't know anything and I was just trying to get through the process and I was wishing that we could just you know of course have the whole divorce as be done and and I was making offers left and right but that again, that's here nor there at this point, but I was I just didn't realize I was walking into a mess. And I was walking into really when I look in retrospect, it was a sucker punch trap. And everybody knew that was going on in the divorce pretty much except me. And so back to you know, back to the peremptory challenge. So Commissioner comes in. We stipulate but then I talked to somebody at the facilitator's office, at the courthouse, and they told me basically look, you can still use your peremptory challenge because no orders were made. And so I found the peremptory challenge and this is warning bill number one, basically Commissioner Patty Radek, and even though I requested her to remove herself, using my peremptory challenge, she still stayed on the case. That you know, that was concerning right there. At that point, I didn't know that her supervising boss, her supervising judge was friends and work has worked with my ex wife for years. So again, I found that out much later..."
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to HTTP://www.KidsMatter.charity
Does Civil Disobedience in Family Court work?
Rob Emert did it - here's what happened
Excerpt: "This is really what the very beginning where I really didn't know anything and I was just trying to get through the process and I was wishing that we could just you know of course have the whole divorce as be done and and I was making offers left and right but that again, that's here nor there at this point, but I was I just didn't realize I was walking into a mess. And I was walking into really when I look in retrospect, it was a sucker punch trap. And everybody knew that was going on in the divorce pretty much except me. And so back to you know, back to the peremptory challenge. So Commissioner comes in. We stipulate but then I talked to somebody at the facilitator's office, at the courthouse, and they told me basically look, you can still use your peremptory challenge because no orders were made. And so I found the peremptory challenge and this is warning bill number one, basically Commissioner Patty Radek, and even though I requested her to remove herself, using my peremptory challenge, she still stayed on the case. That you know, that was concerning right there. At that point, I didn't know that her supervising boss, her supervising judge was friends and work has worked with my ex wife for years. So again, I found that out much later..."
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to HTTP://www.KidsMatter.charity
Does Civil Disobedience in Family Court work?
Rob Emert did it - here's what happened
Excerpt: "This is really what the very beginning where I really didn't know anything and I was just trying to get through the process and I was wishing that we could just you know of course have the whole divorce as be done and and I was making offers left and right but that again, that's here nor there at this point, but I was I just didn't realize I was walking into a mess. And I was walking into really when I look in retrospect, it was a sucker punch trap. And everybody knew that was going on in the divorce pretty much except me. And so back to you know, back to the peremptory challenge. So Commissioner comes in. We stipulate but then I talked to somebody at the facilitator's office, at the courthouse, and they told me basically look, you can still use your peremptory challenge because no orders were made. And so I found the peremptory challenge and this is warning bill number one, basically Commissioner Patty Radek, and even though I requested her to remove herself, using my peremptory challenge, she still stayed on the case. That you know, that was concerning right there. At that point, I didn't know that her supervising boss, her supervising judge was friends and work has worked with my ex wife for years. So again, I found that out much later..."
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to HTTP://www.KidsMatter.charity
Does Civil Disobedience in Family Court work?
Rob Emert did it - here's what happened
Excerpt: "This is really what the very beginning where I really didn't know anything and I was just trying to get through the process and I was wishing that we could just you know of course have the whole divorce as be done and and I was making offers left and right but that again, that's here nor there at this point, but I was I just didn't realize I was walking into a mess. And I was walking into really when I look in retrospect, it was a sucker punch trap. And everybody knew that was going on in the divorce pretty much except me. And so back to you know, back to the peremptory challenge. So Commissioner comes in. We stipulate but then I talked to somebody at the facilitator's office, at the courthouse, and they told me basically look, you can still use your peremptory challenge because no orders were made. And so I found the peremptory challenge and this is warning bill number one, basically Commissioner Patty Radek, and even though I requested her to remove herself, using my peremptory challenge, she still stayed on the case. That you know, that was concerning right there. At that point, I didn't know that her supervising boss, her supervising judge was friends and work has worked with my ex wife for years. So again, I found that out much later..."
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to HTTP://www.KidsMatter.charity
Does Civil Disobedience in Family Court work?
Rob Emert did it - here's what happened
Excerpt: "This is really what the very beginning where I really didn't know anything and I was just trying to get through the process and I was wishing that we could just you know of course have the whole divorce as be done and and I was making offers left and right but that again, that's here nor there at this point, but I was I just didn't realize I was walking into a mess. And I was walking into really when I look in retrospect, it was a sucker punch trap. And everybody knew that was going on in the divorce pretty much except me. And so back to you know, back to the peremptory challenge. So Commissioner comes in. We stipulate but then I talked to somebody at the facilitator's office, at the courthouse, and they told me basically look, you can still use your peremptory challenge because no orders were made. And so I found the peremptory challenge and this is warning bill number one, basically Commissioner Patty Radek, and even though I requested her to remove herself, using my peremptory challenge, she still stayed on the case. That you know, that was concerning right there. At that point, I didn't know that her supervising boss, her supervising judge was friends and work has worked with my ex wife for years. So again, I found that out much later..."
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to HTTP://www.KidsMatter.charity
Welcome to the divorce matters podcast where we teach you how to survive the family court system, we will give you no nonsense straightforward strategies for getting you an equitable outcome.
Our guest is John O'Brien who finds himself in San Diego family court and faced a lot of the same issues from parents going through the "system". It's obvious to everyone that the San Diego family court system needs serious reform, but there's too much money in the system to incentive any change.
You'll learn a lot from this episode, we go through his case and let you know what we would have done given his situation.
About John:
Yeah, hi. Hi, I'm John O'Brien. I'm, I'm 54 years old. And I currently am going through a divorce. And I have, I have two young young boys, they're eight and five. And this has been a long process over the last two and a half years. And, you know, this is my second divorce. And by far, this has been the hardest divorce. And you know, I'm not too familiar with. I've been born and raised here in San Diego. And this is like my really my first time through the court system. So you know, like, this is my hometown. This is this is where I'm from. So, you know, this is this is all I know, San Diego, you know, it's a beautiful place. And that's pretty much who I am and where I'm from. And, you know, my, my kids live, this is where they're from, they're they're born and raised here. And I'm just trying to, to give them the best life that's possible. And, you know, and unfortunately, that's not, doesn't seem to be happening. The system's a lot, a lot harder than I thought out
Kristin Michelle is a mother and friend. I have been following her case for months and have witnessed firsthand how she has been kept out of her own Dependency Court case as they make decisions about her child without her present. Listen to this incredibly heartbreaking story and what she is doing about it.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
Tennessee attorney bravely comes on the show to discuss custody issues
We discuss
-
How to obtain custody or more custody in family court
-
The custody issues in my case and what I did about it
-
How to handle the judge, Guardian Ad Litem and opposing counsel
-
Corruption in the process
Sponsored by Kids Matter www.kidsmatter.charity donate to give kids a voice in divorce
Christie Black is a family court reform advocate and friend to many self-represented family court victims.
We discuss
-
My own case
-
Her crazy case
-
What she's witnessed in helping hundreds of family court victims.
-
What needs to change in family court
Want to help people like Christie? donate to HTTP://www.kidsmatter.charity
Family attorney Miles Mason and I discuss bias among judges, bias in the system and a deeply flawed family law practice. Listen in as Miles debates me - let us know your take as well.
Vicci Bailey claims CPS is corrupt and tells me how they colluded to deprive her of her son.
Vicci also claims her son is in imminent danger. He recently was hiding in the back of a Petco bathroom in San Diego, from the father who allegedly sexually and physically abusing him. This precious boy's name is Charlie. He is 16 with an Autism diagnosis.
And that's just the beginning of it. Hear Vicci tell her story of how corrupt court actors have deprived her of her son.
Hear about a potential white knight judge here in the County of San Diego.
Vicci Bailey claims CPS is corrupt and tells me how they colluded to deprive her of her son.
Vicci also claims her son is in imminent danger. He recently was hiding in the back of a Petco bathroom in San Diego, from the father who allegedly sexually and physically abusing him. This precious boy's name is Charlie. He is 16 with an Autism diagnosis.
And that's just the beginning of it. Hear Vicci tell her story of how corrupt court actors have deprived her of her son.
Hear about a potential white knight judge here in the County of San Diego.
Vicci Bailey claims CPS is corrupt and tells me how they colluded to deprive her of her son.
Vicci also claims her son is in imminent danger. He recently was hiding in the back of a Petco bathroom in San Diego, from the father who allegedly sexually and physically abusing him. This precious boy's name is Charlie. He is 16 with an Autism diagnosis.
And that's just the beginning of it. Hear Vicci tell her story of how corrupt court actors have deprived her of her son.
Hear about a potential white knight judge here in the County of San Diego.
Alex Falconi went from having Zero custody to Primary Custody. Learn what he did that can help you.
"My ex didn't want me to see our son. It was because of, I guess, revenge purposes is the quickest way to explain it. The entire case is published on my YouTube channel, people who want to watch it. And I filed the custody petition because that's what I had to do.
Because I wanted to see him she didn't want me to see him. And that triggered several responses. She got an attorney accused me of domestic violence, which apparently back then was a common thing that I guess mothers would do to get a leg up in custody fights. Now it's a common thing doesn't change. Well, in Nevada, it's actually becoming a lot less common. But I do hear that another states, it's still the same. Anyway, I'm trying to be fair to the judiciary, because back then it was a routine thing to do. And now, not only is it not routine, but it can backfire.
Anyway, because of all of those allegations, ended up starting out with supervised visits, and then over the course of representing myself against the attorney, I went from supervised visits to visitation rights to primary physical custody or joint physical custody, and then the primary physical custody, then I got sole legal custody, then her visitation was suspended.
Then I had her banned from going to appointments and stuff. And then finally, her parental rights were terminated. And my wife adopted him. So I started from, you know, the very beginning with nothing in at the very end, everything, I hate to characterize it that way. And I would never do that if I didn't publish my entire series. The reason I say it so boldly now is because if people think that there's a problem with it, watch it. It's a 226 part series, by the time you're done with it, you will say, Okay, I see how this happened. So I mean, that's the we're gonna stay high level, because, you know, I'm all for 5050. So she must have done something really, really bad, and to lose her rights, or it's just a corrupt judiciary that you were able to exploit.
I'm guessing it's the former not the latter, though, if anyone exploited the judiciary with her and her attorney, as a non attorney, and I was in college, so it's not like I even I didn't even have the average amount of income that an ordinary person would have. I was filing for a fee waivers and form a poppers applications. So I mean, I really wasn't nobody. And the judge both judges on the way multiple times. So I had to file appeals, I ended up winning four Supreme Court appeals. And then I filed a writ petition got published. So justice Michael cherry of the Supreme Court, Nevada published a repetition that I had filed, it's named after me. So it took a lot of intervention from our high courts to get the case back on track.
And then it just took forever. It took over 20 hearings. I mean, you just took forever, it took hundreds of filings and a ton of hearings. And finally, after eight years, I got the outcome that was certainly in the best interest of our son. And I actually agree with you, I do not think that primary physical custody is the way to go.
Ordinarily, I do believe very much in joint physical custody, even though it didn't work in my case. And I do believe that termination of parental rights and the erasure of a parent is an absolute last resort. I do believe that as well. And that's one of the reasons that I published everything because I knew people would be very upset about that. So a lot of people will then watch the videos, and they will walk away and say I get it now. Anyway, go ahead.
Tell me about what happened with the trial courts in Nevada. They fucked up so badly. Well, I think it's a myriad of issues. I do. I guess, the first and most obvious problem that I faced and this is not consistent with all judges, but I would say most judges back then and now I would say maybe around three
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
Frank Hand was blindsided by the family court system in New York. His lawyers didn't do him any favors and took a lot of money from him.
Frank discusses his story and what he went to. He finally had to recuse the attorney general and a judge to move his case forward.
- False allegations and Domestic Violence
- Getting a judge recused
- Judicial misconduct
- Gaslighting
Are you a whistleblower? Contact us!
Sponsored by Kids Matter www.kidsmatter.charity donate to give kids a voice in divorce
How Brent fought pro-se against a San Jose Divorce Crime Family and their ecosystem, and used an AI to gain an advantage.
Learn how Brent Oster filed a RICO using AI to gather evidence and support. This is not a podcast you want to miss.
"A judicial system when one human decides is always corrupt, and has been since Ancient Egyptian and Roman times. We cannot fix that. The system needs to be disrupted, displaced, and replaced by something better, more modern, where humans and their flaws have less influence."
Brent filed a RICO lawsuit against the Law Firms of Hector and Marilyn Moreno, and Intero Real-Estate Services as the primary operators of the racketeering enterprise. I named a Judge, a temp real-estate Judge, and a DA as personally acting outside their official duties and conspiring with those operators of the racketeering enterprise.
You CANNOT file RICO against a Court, or any government agency, Even a color of law person (Judge, DA, police) acting in their official capacity is immune. The best you can get is conspiracy if they really stepped out of bounds, took a bribe,....
So the title should be RICO Filed Against Divorce Attorneys' Racketeering Enterprise.
Check out RICO Attorney Jeffery E Grells chapter on RICO and Government:
https://ricoact.com/?page_id=60
d. Extortion vs. Legitimate Exercise of Government Power
Extortion “under color of official right” should not be confused with the legitimate exercise of government power. Governmental power, by its nature, is legalized extortion, e.g.,: unless you abide by the law, you’ll go to jail; unless you buy car insurance, your license will be revoked; unless you pay taxes, you’ll go to jail and be fined; unless you register your gun, your gun will be confiscated. But for the government’s authority to jail people and fine people and confiscate their property, how many of us would abide by the law? If we all naturally treated each other in a decent manner, there would be no need for government. From the first day that man emerged from the wilderness, however, most political philosophers and most of our experiences have taught us that if left to our own devices, people will rob from each other, abuse each other, and kill each other. Thus, pursuant to the basic social contract upon which all governments are based, people have consented to the government’s use of extortion to keep all of us in line and to make sure that we all abide by the prevailing standards of decency.
The government’s power to extort proper behavior from each of us is limited only by “due process,” i.e., the government can’t send someone to jail unless they first receive a fair trial, a law cannot be enforced unless it is properly approved by our elected officials and thereafter monitored by our courts, etc. A citizen cannot complain that he or she is being extorted by their government if the government is simply enforcing a law that complies with society’s sense of due process. It is difficult to imagine when an official act of government could constitute extortion. When considering official government action, the appropriateness of the government’s action is measured by the Constitution — not by the criminal law of extortion. If the government does not have the power to enforce a law against a citizen (i.e., if the government does not have the power to extort certain behavior from a citizen), the law is unconstitutional – not extortionistic.
Background
My wife and I got caught up in a dirty divorce scam 2017-2020, with the Law firms of J Hector Moreno, and Marilyn Moreno representing my ex-wife. The lawyers got orders and charges against me (with a nephew in the DA office's help), and I have to leave the country to avoid constant arrest. They put me in fear and by extortion got orders to sell my home. Then a corrupt temp judge, Sharon Roper took control of the sale process, Intero Real Estate Services did the unlawful sale, laundered the funds and they all paid themselves well - my wife and I got nothing, and have spent our retirement fighting in the divorce. The Moreno Attorneys and their conspirers have defrauded hundreds of people in the past decade with this pattern of racketeering - this is a 3rd generation crime family, a real mob. This is why I filed a RICO lawsuit against them in July 2021, using a a prototype Legal AI - Justine Falcon, using those tools to finds 63 other cases in the same pattern of racketeering, 5 that are an exact match with 2 other victims providing testimony. As a pro-se, this is my 8th filing, and I continue to learn law and refine the AI tools.
**Please list the Judges, Attorneys, etc that acted as bad actors in your situation** Hector and Marilyn Moreno - Attorneys, Michael H Moreno - DA prosecutor
Richard and I discuss controlling the courtroom and removal of bad judges. Join Richard at https://www.david-vs-goliath.org/
or email him info@david-vs-goliath.org
What is your story? My background was in film and entertainment. By accident, iI got caught up in a legal situation that forced me to investigate and research how the inner workings of the judicial system works.
Lisa Goodpaster discusses how to identify and reverse parental alienation. If you're a victim of parental alienation, than this podcast episode is for you.
Here’s the link for free 10 signs of Parental alienation https://tinyurl.com/yan4dph5 Donate to www.Kidsmatter.charity
Mark Reel is owner of Reel Father's Rights and has been through the system. He was treated so badly that he went to law school to learn how to fight back.
Mark discusses how to win at Pro Se, what to avoid and why fathers are held to a different standard.
Angry text messages are now considered domestic abuse
Why preponderance of the evidence is bullshit and why your federal rights are violated as a result.
Why fathers are trying to overcome 60 years of lobbying.
Why Best interest of child is in name only and not in practice
Mark's #1 rule for father's success
Why judges often get it wrong due to case overload
Bio
Sports and Fitness Exec for a decade. Graduated law school in 2017, didn't take the bar until 2020, inspired by 3.5 year custody battle. Founded Fathers Rights Law Firm in 2021.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
5 years and counting George Argell has been fighting his case in Family Court in Texas and Michigan.
Learn how George was tricked by his ex into changing venue to Michigan and causing him 5 years of pain with the family courts
Fake allegations, hearsay and no evidence. Sound familiar?
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
Calling it "Family Court" is a misnomer. It's not about the family, it's about the players making money in the system. In today's episode, Michael Sayen discusses the history of divorce and what needs to happen today to change family court corruption.
What history teaches us about how to organize a group under one leader to create change.
At the end of the episode, Sayen discusses how to potentially get your case into the Federal court system.
BIO
was engaged to get married. She was previously divorced. The Bible scriptures surrounding divorce and remarriage seemed to be contradictory. The church pastors told me to pray about it. I told God that if He would ever tell me the truth in this subject, that I would share it with the world.
This book was written 20 years after that prayer.
Want to see change?
donate to www.Kidsmatter.charity
Where is the media? Why haven't they covered more of family court stories?
investigative journalist Michael Volpe of PJ Media describes why the press won't cover these cases.
Michael Volpe BIO As seen in: The Times, The Daily Caller, The American Conservative, The Stage, Lexology, Bloomberg Law News, Bloomberg Industry Group, The Arts Desk, Long Island Press, Gotham Gazette and more After spending more than a decade in finance, I changed course entirely in my professional career and became a freelance journalist.
Since 2009, I've been published both locally in Chicago in newspapers and magazines like New City, Times of Northwest Indiana, Inside Booster, Welles Park Bulldog, Chicago Reader, and Chicago Heights Patch.
I've also expanded into national stories. On the national level, my work has been published in such places as the Daily Caller, WND, Counter Punch, Crime Magazine, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference Newsletter, Front Page Magazine, and Big Government.
In 2009, my expose of Dr. Anna Chacko led in part to her termination from the Pittsburgh VA. My expose of Dr. Chacko also received coverage in the Pittsburgh Tribune as well as the radiology website, Aunt Minnie.
In October 2012, I published my first book entitled "Prosecutors Gone Wild: The Inside Story of the Trial of Chuck Panici, John Gliottoni, and Louise Marshall."
In 1993, once powerful City of Chicago Heights mayor, Chuck Panici, was convicted, along with co-defendants John Gliottoni and Louise Marshall, of a number of corruption related charges, including RICO charges.
This book revisits that trial and exposes the corruption perpetrated on the court. The book proves that all three defendants were innocent and victims of a grand conspiracy perpetrated by ambitious prosecutors and desperate criminals.
Today, we have Megan Fox who is writing and reporting about the corrupt family court practices in St Louis Missouri. You'll be stunned and shocked at what the courts are doing there to take children away from competent parents and the amount of money they are taking away from families.
ABOUT MEGAN
Journalist and Author
"Believe Evidence; The Death of Due Process From Salome to #MeToo"
Twitter @MeganFoxWriter
Investigative reporter uncovering corruption involving colluding guardians ad litem, attorneys, psychologists, and judges to drag out custody disputes and drain the financial resources of American families. Let's end that.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
https://kidsmatter.charity/campaigns/kids-matter-donate/donate/
Let's let's talk about discovery in the context of Family Court. Want to learn how to do proper discovery? Listen to Michael as he explains how.
"Oh, you know, there's so much you can do. But attorneys Don't do this. Why? Because it just tweaks the system on its head. You know, example of a discovery abuse while you can go after your other parties if you have a child and family law, banking records, to prove or disprove an economical thing that's absolutely discoverable. For the purposes of calculating child support. income and expense declarations are mandatory. So anything contained they're in and one of the questions on the Judicial Council form is do you have a bank account that all becomes discoverable example of a Use."
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
Mark Andrews has been fighting his parental alienation case for several years. He's faced judicial fraud, appellate courts and fake transcripts.
Andrews recently met with Congressman Mark Desaulnier from California and Andrews revealed what transpired.
Mark Andrews complaints about family court.
- That his due process 5th and 14th was violated
- Commissioner openly decided to violate the right to a hearing and covered it up
- The defense team lied to a Federal court and got away from it
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
Richard Rindt joins me to discuss his case and how he could have ended differently had he known several key things.
Key points
- The importance of filing first
- False allegations and silver bullets
- Why fathers are guilty until proven innocent
- Why money stokes conflict
- Why emergency orders of protection rob of you of your children
- Judicial discretion to freeze assets
- Strategies for mediation
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to www.KidsMatter.charity
Michael Alexander is back and we talk about the rules of evidence. It's complicated but necessary to help you understand how the court works.
You need to understand the rules of evidence in order to properly introduce and use evidence in your family matters case.
Rules of Evidence Notes
https://www.courts.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=five
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
Walter Richardson discusses his divorce and how he fought false charges levied against him.
How to fight false charges
- Engaged to highschool love interest
- Cheating lying abuse explosive tantrums
- Pregnancy out of wedlock
- 2 protection orders
- 42k in litigation fees
- Outcome 43% custody for dad
- How to be a good parent & Minimize Conflict
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
https://kidsmatter.charity/campaigns/kids-matter-donate/donate/
So many mothers and fathers are losing their kids because of false allegations, misguided judges, or a bureaucratic system. Learn how Kenneth Rosa is navigating this minefield and how you can protect your self.
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
Is this the USA or USSR? Forged parent signatures? Blank removal order documents signed by real judges? Secret Recordings?
Yes, Sylvia Beachy is our first whistleblower and she reveals what's really happening behind the scenes with CPS and the Foster Care system. You will be shocked.
If you've had a run-in with Georgia CPS, you should have your case reviewed. Especially if you're in Guenette County, Georgia
Need Help?
http://www.FightCPS.com
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
https://kidsmatter.charity/campaigns/kids-matter-donate/donate/
You have to listen to Carnell's story to believe it.
Carnell Smith took his own paternity case to the US Supreme Court of the United States without an Attorney and after two meetings with the court, they told him "NO". He persisted and won his case using the law that he co-wrote with the Georgia Legislators.
- Lobbied for and/or coached victims and advocates across multiple states on HOW-TO create new paternity disestablishment legislation with the critical component
- Launched the Citizens Against Paternity Fraud Advocacy group that helped other states
BIO
Carnell Smith - Author and Consultant who serves and supports men and women that want to discover the truth about family identity using DNA, Law and Advocacy. #SetTheCaptivesFree
TRAPPED BY LAW eBook and Paperback on Amazon https://Amz.run/3MD1
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
https://kidsmatter.charity/campaigns/kids-matter-donate/donate/
After 2 years of daily torture by vindictive eX who tried in vain to jail him 5 times, multiple zero proof restraining orders, 3 different states with DHS CPS cases with false allegations, a biased judge, incompetent and lazy multiple attorneys who are part of the problem who charge $435h, expensive supervised visits at $666 per 2 hours to be with his own kids.
Almost $10,000 for a biased custody evaluation, $53,500 to ex to remove her name off his property, $23,000 4 day trial, being
forced her to pay $2600 mo child support with no job while on disability, being only given 8 weekends a year with kids and being responsible to pay $2000 for travel in addition to child support, being in debt over half a million dollars ($560,000), bankruptcy documents, lost health, lost job, lost car, alienated kids who are blocked from talking to Bogdan even though calls are scheduled but never happen because his eX doesn't allow kids to pick up phone.
His eX won't put the kids on the plane as scheduled and tells me to take her to court because nothing will happen to her.....
Bogdan's letter to his kids: "Daddy still loves you and One day if you are willing to listen to my side of the story and what really happened - I am ready to sit down and tell and show all evidence."
Time for a new life and new chapter.
**Bad Judge: Keith Raines, Washington County, Oregon
His Story**
I have 3 children. Daughter is 12 and sons 9 and 6. Two years ago my wife decided to divorce me and follow her twin sister. She moved 9 times so far. From Oregon to South Carolina and Arizona and so on… with children - following her twin sister who keeps moving. I have zero criminal history. Never drank, smoke and never did drugs. I was very involved with kids from the hour they were born. Kids enjoyed quality time we had together when I took them out to park or restaurant or library or whenever they wanted to go. I thought them how to read in two languages. English and Russian. I thought them how to play piano. I am a musician. All this abruptly ended when my wife decided to move to south Carolina where her twin lived at that time. For 8 months I had zero access to children and did not even know if they were alive. Then I finally was able to talk to them. The divorce took 1.5 years. I was forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars to see my own kids which made me go deep into debt and now filing for bankruptcy. At the end of trial judge allowed her to move with kids again to be with her twin sister -now in Arizona.
Watch Bogdan's Surviving divorce for men YouTube Channel
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
Every case is different, so you have to kind of determine what happened and what your options are, usually an appeal can't be done, until there is a final decision in family law. Since you're dealing with children, and until they're either 18 or 21 if they're going to college. There can be no idle determination. So you have all these lower court rulings that can only be "appealed" by what's called a writ.
And what is a Writ?
It's a form of written command in the name of a reviewing court or other legal authority to act or abstain from acting in some way. It's a way to enforce compliance or submission of a lower court's order.
So there's a big difference. An appeal. An appeal is more serious. It's an urgent request, and it's a, it's about reviewing a final decision. Learn more by listening to the podcast.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
Advantages and disadavantes of pro per (Self-Representation)
- What is pro per
- Why pro per? Or attorney?
- What are advantages and disadvantages of Pro Per
- When do you know when to go Pro Per?
If you get one thing wrong, it could totally blow your case wide open, or you could lose something very, very important. So you've got to be careful in deciding whether to hire an attorney, or go pro per. If you become a pro per expert, you will annihilate any attorney that can help you. Maybe not any, but they won't do some of the things that Michael's done, for example. And that's important, because I know, a lot of people listening to this podcast, are thinking, you know, they're losing, and they're losing, and they're losing these little battles, but they don't understand they may end up winning the war. But it's important to know what you should be doing to help your case.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.us
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity
Welcome to the first Episode of Divorce Matters, delivering judicial justice for a biased system. Our first episode is for anyone, and I do mean anyone that is either going to go through the divorce court and/or family court system. It's also for anyone who's already in it and is disgruntled or for anyone in my case, that's does not have 50/50 custody. So, this is going to be something that you're going to want to tune into on a regular basis. If you feel like you're being mistreated, in family courts which is probably gonna be most of you, this is your new home.
Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity