Points of view considerably less limited by partisanship-approved talking points. Secondarily, sports points of views, and sometimes out-there "crank files" points of view (but ARE they "crank files," really?).
All rights reserved, copyright 2017, for "Titan Thinking man" profile pic, which is a derivative work of two pics:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Titan01-hi-1-.jpg listed in public domain as a NASA work.
https://pixabay.com/p-159771/?no_redirect Listed Creative Commons, free for commercial use, no attribution required.
Intro and outro music both are "Alien Operator" by the band "Alien Operator." Creative commons license, with attribution required, non-commercial use. http://freemusicarchive.org/music/AlienOperator/AcidPlanetZuberon/03-AlienOperator-Alien_Operator
RFK Jr. knows the power he wields in his pen. The power to move the world, and much of the Covid nonsense of the last 6 years, and threat in the future. So why isn't he using it? We may have a hint.
Sources:
The New York Times quoted me, mentioning the unmentionable... the PREP Act declaration for covid, [a fake] which RFK Jr. refuses to terminate.(on sashalatypova.substack.com.
RFK Jr. Ended EUA for COVID Vaccines — But Not Liability Protection for Vaccine Makers (Children's Health Defense)
As Kennedy Turns from Vaccines, MAHA Allies see a "Betrayal" (New York Times)
Related Episodes:
TSOT160: Truth Archive - An Awake Democrat Rep on Shameful 2005 PREP Act Pushed Through by Bought Repub Power Brokers (spotify link)
=================================================
Nearly unbelievable until you realize demons have no limitations on their behavior.
**A study closed for a reasonable treatment because you couldn't find enough trial participants that had Covid??
In June 2020????**
Hydroxychlorine's treatment by the Demon, versus how he favored the (70 times more expensive, at least) Remdesivir*.
Latter - oh it's known to be not effective for Ebola, is unapproved, and its toxic effects are a big concern the Demon (but only when he discusses it the very first time).
Former - Already approved, we have a lot of experience with it. Safety profile is much less of a concern. It's path to full distribution can be much less stringent than for Remdesivir.
But ONE gets a trial started by April 27 of 2020.
The other, seven weeks later, is stopped because they can't find enough participants.
. . .
In June of 2020. As "cases" were "exploding."
For one, they find a reason to pull even EUA for distribution in the meantime, before they closed the trial. I'll let you guess which one.
Demon Anthony Fauci
$700 per dose, per October 1, 2021*
Source: Fauci Diary Package
Dates of Note: June 20, 2020; March 17, 2020; March 18, 2020; April 27, 2020; October 1, 2021
=================================================
‘Q-Anon’ bears striking resemblance to Bolshevik psy-op from 1920s known As ‘Operation Trust’
Operation Trust: The 100-Year-Old Soviet Psyop Repackaged As Qanon And The MAGA Movement
=================================================
An analysis of the article THE NAME THAT APPEARS 12,000 TIMES IN THE EPSTEIN FILES AND NO ONE WANTS TO SAY, which appears on the Elegant Ruin Substack.
Here I think of the Rothschild's as kind of the historical Original Gangsters of elite scumbag steerers of the fates of countries. Probably because I just don't need to dig all the way back to them to find plenty of evidence of ultimate wrongdoing, and ultimate betrayal of citizens by their "leaders."
But here, straight from the Epstein files, both the inherent connection to Epstein . . .
literally in a communication to no more of a power player in 2026 than the (inherently awful) Peter Thiel "As you probably know, I represent the Rothschilds."AND no less than a power broker than Les Wexner, of Victoria's Secret fame admits he let Epstein have POWER OF ATTORNEY over his finances (!) because he knew of Epstein's because a Rothschild told him of Epstein's connection to their finances!
And more.=================================================
These names currently live in infamy. They're shall live in further infamy, in the history of the United States and with the memory of the victims of future unjust and disproportionate violence and wars, if the Senate adds a similar list:1. TWO-HUNDRED AND NINE House Republicans, not listed separately in the list of Republicans further below. 2. The following Democrats, clearly captured and corrupt beyond the point of possibility of repair, given that as Democrats they had every reason to go with the the other TWO-HUNDRED AND FIVE members of their party to vote against the NDAA, even if they were aware of the particular attempt at supreme foreign takeover that is the subject of this episode: * Henry Cuellar (D-TX) * Don Davis (D-NC) * Jared Golden (D-ME) * Adam Gray (D-CA) * Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX) * Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA).
The following are the ONLY Republicans (a mere 7 out of TWO-HUNDRED AND SIXTEEN, 3.2%) who have any intention of upholding the Constitution and being loyal to the American people. If your state does not appear in this list, not even ONE of your Republican representatives intend to serve you or his or her oath loyally. * Josh Brecheen (OK) * Tim Burchett (TN) * Eli Crane (AZ) * Harriet Hageman (WY) * Anna Paulina Luna (FL) * Thomas Massie (KY) * Chip Roy (TX)
SOME RELATED EPISODES:
QROT-199: A Beloved Actor Expresses His Proper Moral Outrage
QROT-172: The Yahu: Christians Not 100% Israel All the Time Are "Christian Reich"
TSOT134: Understanding Israel - "Rise and [Execute] First"
TSOT154: We're Going to Break This Trance. We MUST Start Treating Humanity Like We Would Want to Be Treated
QROT-196: Trump's Foreign Focus Screwing Away Any Chance at Net Positive Legacy. It's Over.
TSOT162: Special Guest Jenna McCarthy, on Charlie Kirk Oddities (and Miscellany)
QROT-193: Further Need for Trump's Rectocraniectomy
TSOT163: Governor: City - You Have No Right to Decide Whether to DIRECTLY SUPPORT ANOTHER COUNTRY With Your Taxpayer's Money! A Tale Involving the Usual Suspects
QROT-188: It Depends On What the Meaning of the Phrase "Will Not Be Bombing" Is. Apparently Surprisingly Ambiguous.
TSOT140: Do These Sound Like Western or American Ideals of Tolerance and Vigorous Discussion of Issues to You?
TSOT139: "Peace," "Cease Fire," Just More Opportunity to Deceive and Destroy for Israel
QROT-181: Cultural Homicide, Not "Rescue From A Despot"
QROT-159: A Trio Emphases of Truth
=================================================
Huge nod to 911revision's substack, where I found this information due to them pointing out some articles. This one being the one I was perusing, but I was just pointing out one small aspect of it - so I recommend highly you go visit. Even finishing that article is a lot more than I have covered here, and they have a lot of articles.
Steel columns fraying? From a physical collision the pressure of which was distributed over dozens of them?
That's not how this works. That's not how colllision physics work.
Instead the string cheese and frayed rope appearance is in line with the Hutchison effect, which is what happens to materials when subjected to energies related to Tesla technologies.
=================================================
I'll bet you didn't think someone would draw this parallel. That's why I'm here.
What does the current status of Rand Paul's* feuding with the Demon on behalf of all Americans have to do with season six (seven? Ahem) of The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch?
VAGUE SPOILER:
. . .
. . .
Yeah, we KNOW... so can we please continue in the next step in the logical progression.
If there is anything about which individuals should be expected to disagree, it is about which side of a foreign war to support, and particularly whether to support either side directly with your own money. After all, wars mean aggression and death. A naturally organic thing to have an opinion on.
Two parts to this episode:1. The general idea - it is true (this is less researched, but still I believe well established. See description and links below. 2. The threat letter from a Republican Governor (Abbott, from Texas) saying that for the city of San Marcos to have an opinion on what they should invest in (at least when it is THIS topic) is a violation of the law and that he will take away state grants from them. The thing is, and it won't surprise you given the motivation... he's full of sh*t and is totally misstating the law (on behalf of another nation who doesn't believe in our laws)
That said, I'll give you sources in reverse.
Sources for #2 above, here's the letter, from puppeted, black-magick controlled Governor Greg Abbott to the City of San Marcos.
(hey dips#t, the Jesus you report to love and follow is a false idol in the eyes of your puppeteers (I know, he's under a trance, so this point is probably futile, but I can try. I'm a communicator not a fighter))*
Sources for #1 above (the concept broadly) * Breaking the Bonds Between U.S. Local and State Public Funds and the Occupation of Palestine * https://www.icij.org/news/2024/07/inside-the-sophisticated-sales-operation-funneling-billions-from-us-state-and-local-governments-to-israel/ * https://ladylibertie.substack.com/p/how-to-spot-the-israel-money-machine * https://www.reddit.com/r/TexasPolitics/comments/1kn22y0/why_is_my_taxpayer_money_funding_foreign/ * https://www.txbiz.org/2025/03/18/solidifying-the-texas-israel-relationship-to-strengthen-our-economic-future/
-----------------------------------------------------------As to the AI summary, here's a paste of that. Again, not checked fact by fact, but seems to be mostly on the money (no pun intended):
Some U.S. cities and counties may be directly funding Israel through investments in "Israel Bonds" without full public awareness, as these funds often come from property taxes and public pension funds managed by local officials. Since 2023, U.S. states and municipalities have purchased over $1.7 billion in Israeli sovereign bonds, with some officials promoting these investments as patriotic support during wartime.
Local funding mechanisms include property tax revenues and public employee pension funds being invested in Israel Bonds, which are marketed as secure financial instruments but carry political and legal risks. For example, Palm Beach County has invested $700 million of constituent property taxes in these bonds, making it the world's largest government investor in Israel Bonds. Critics argue these investments may violate Prudent Investor Standards and local investment policies due to Israel's downgraded credit rating (now Baa1, below the AA required by many jurisdictions).
Transparency gaps exist because:
Full donor and investment disclosures may not occur until after elections or budget cycles
Many residents are unaware their property taxes or pension contributions are invested abroad
Israel Bonds proceeds go to Israel's general budget with no restrictions on military or settlement use
Advocacy groups like DAWN have filed complaints alleging Israel Bonds may operate as an unregistered foreign agent, while organizations such as Not My Tax Dollars campaign for divestment and greater transparency about where local tax revenues are invested.
=================================================
For the first time*, a guest on The Scales of Truth! Substack author and humor writer Jenna McCarthy! AND it's the first full video I've done corresponding to an episode of the scales of truth - if you'd like to see the video version, please go to Substack! https://thescalesoftruth.substack.com
Some topics
I’m not spoiling, but at a high-level we discuss:
Some Tease Tidbits (aka, Wait WHAT?)
Timestamps for sections
6:05 Jenna describes how her life was changed, as catalyzed by events starting in early 2020.
54:03 Start… of Close
Some of Jenna’s other recent topics and her approach to finding topics.
Where you can find Jenna
=================================================
[EDITED 7/17/26 - Long pauses removed]
First my story of discovery upon initially figuring getting rid of wi-fi in my house would be only so hard.
Then the web search engine AI conversations to prove the different aspects of why there really is NO reason these WiFis, Wifis... should be hidden everywhere.
Sources:
A Reddit thread where an engineer type is detecting a strong signal coming from his roku streamer when he just wants to use a simple remote. A quote from the orignal poster:
I am a network engineer and I set up the WiFi devices in my household around -65dBm. This Roku Ultra sends out very strong signal (sometimes even in the -3x dBm range from from 15ft away!) I don't want such WiFi level near me.
A Roku Express owner back in 2017 well detecting the wi fi, which to them is appearing as strong as their home network wifi, even verifying with MAC address.
This Voice Remote document that confirms it uses a 2.4 GHz signal.
FCC Caution:
Any changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for
compliance could void the user’s authority to operate this equipment.
Operation in the 2.4GHz band in the US is firmware-limited to Channels 1 through 11.
Roku Ultra streaming box FCC ID page. Includes manuals, internal views, test reports, et cetera
=================================================
Literally no less than in cover of night pushing for immunity* with only one person (HHS Secretary) deciding when or if anyone gets compensated for injury.
Judicial review? Civil lawsuit availability? Nope. Because an individual said so. Yet somehow he's not in jail.
Here here to Dave Obey, Democratic Representative from Wisconsin, putting on record this summary of this beyond-the-pale high-level corruption. Even as he realizes it will come to nothing.
* For anything - vaxes, drugs, equipment, and more - that might be used as a "countermeasure" for whatever the HHS Secretary deems a public health emergency.Libertarian yet?
Is the President suffering from Stockholm (Tel Aviv?) Syndrome???
Pardon my extremely heated tone here, but I'd prefer it if my President NOT put himself and his country in jeopardy. Especially when he has more than enough evidence to not do so.
HOW many times do you have to be victim to an associate LYING to you before you finally decide to separate yourself from them, or at least no longer act in ANY way based on their "information" (let alone in a very extreme way!)?
WHY would you believe their intelligence... EVER??? LET alone to then make a giant dramatic declaration as though your safety is at risk in some further fashion than usual, and say that you've told the U.S. to DECIMATE a country if something happens to you???
I mean, wouldn't that always be an implied reaction? Do you understand the incentive you have given to the same LIARS who've given you bad "intelligence" over and over??
The same regime that OVER and OVER has practically said "F&#K YOU" to each and EVERY one of your attempts to save life, property, and sovereignty in the Middle East?
The same regime run by fundamentalists of a country whose main religion already technically believes Jesus Christ is a fraud!
PULL. YOUR. HEAD. OUT. MISTER. PRESIDENT!!
Rely ONLY on your OWN nation's intelligence, and even THEN be skeptical before practicing brinksmanship. Before it costs the world a pivot that we will not recover from for decades!
At this point, let's be honest... impeachment is incredibly reasonable.
Of course the issue is that he's scared away and pushed out many of the people who would be the genuine leaders of a reform, MAGA, movement. So, thanks to the guy now worthy of impeachment, if we do impeach him, there is no one to take up the spirit of the MAGA movement.
=================================================
SOME RELATED EPISODES:
QROT-199: A Beloved Actor Expresses His Proper Moral Outrage
QROT-198: Assassin's "CUBA" ties. Sure, buddy. And Police Wasting Time Monitoring for AI Objections
TSOT154: We're Going to Break This Trance. We MUST Start Treating Humanity Like We Would Want to Be Treated
A look at an admission I found from reading the Tenpenny book I've been mentioning.
The Universe-Class criminals that are the WEF, using soft language to thinly veil their satisfaction about how billions allowed the Covid restrictions, due to how well that affects prospects of their future control.
"There have been significant developments in last five to seven years on social, environment and technology fronts that could help realise “My Carbon” . . .Specifically, to mention three developments in this context:1. COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally. . . which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility." [Emphasis added]
It is suggested to drive a three-way approach to shape this movement.
Economic Behavior: Increased costs for carbon-intensive activities and goods. Economic incentives to reduce demand and improve efficiency.
I also go into other tie-ins, as is my way on my longer episodes, so you'll get plenty of reminders of other concepts.
Make NO mistake - their soft language of "individual social responsibility" means really nothing less that we did not rise up in literal revolt against these controls.
Everyone knows that even only something like 70% of the population took even one dose of their Beta Poison. So in NO way did we voluntarily decide we agreed with them. The soft language they use is a mask for the real intent (quote imagined, but true) "we will continue to implement these controls and will continue the drumbeat of using them, and we will continue to convince idiot governments not paying attention to their own Constitutional limits, to subsidize and force them upon their populations on the front end."
But we've discussed him before... as my Dad used to say, he wouldn't know his ass from a hole in the ground, as long as you distract him in SOME way.
SOME RELATED EPISODES:
QROT-128: Those with Clear WEF Connections? Compromised and Ineligible!
TSOT035: Greta and WEF?? WTH? Plus another corollary to P-R-SQROT-198: Assassin's "CUBA" ties. Sure, buddy. And Police Wasting Time Monitoring for AI ObjectionsTSOT154: We're Going to Break This Trance. We MUST Start Treating Humanity Like We Would Want to Be TreatedTSOT142: A Walk Down Crazy Street with "Yeah. THAT'S the ticket!" AI=================================================
An anaylsis and integration with Steve Baker's contribution to the fact pool.
0:00 Intro and initial revisit of facts discussed previously in Scales of Truth.
2:46 initial listen to Tucker and Baker. "Bombs" such a buried story that Tucker didn't detect it for months.
5:03 Baker describes background - public narrative versus revealed whistleblower facts, via revealed FBI forensic report. NOT bombs.
11:21 Blob must protect the blob.
14:51 Second breakdown in plot - the happy circumstance (divine intervention?) by which Trump's activities did not allow for alignment of the provocateurs activities and the presence if the throngs of actual Trump supporters.
24:40 Analysis and connection to broader topics. Revisit of the cross-agency psy op that definitely is used. Reminder of this, among other things (Fake Tall Joe Biden, Steele Dossier,) making look quaint the legendary supposed biggest American political scandal (Watergate).
29:42 Summary overview of J6 pipe bomb fable. How you can recruit patriotic veterans to be a part of the trap.
RELATED EPISODES
TSOT105: DNC Pipe Bomb Video Deep DiveTSOT093: Officer Carries Bag in Direction Where DNC J6 "Pipe Bomb" Was Found 15 Minutes LaterQROT-031: Omar Epps' Brother from Another Mother, and the Latest Date that is Supposed to Invoke Non-ThinkQROT-20: We Heroically Stopped a Fake Crime We Started! Goes the Broken Record.TSOT135: 2018 Crime Solve Illuminates Feds' True Capability to Solve Many Crimes They Actually Want To
A follow-up to TSOT130, Unreal Estate (Fake Estate?) - Enforcing STOPPING the Free Market.
Funny how markets work. When sellers actually try to sell at the price where buyers are, it turns out there is more commerce.
A follow-up to QROT-200.
So the vaccines don't do as well as they could since you combine the virus strain with something that will reproduce well in chicken embryos, huh.
And so your question is whether something utilizing mammals instead of birds may result in an outcome that is more effective for humans???
. . .
Ooookay. I GUESS you can "confirm."
But how many times do we need to???
That's "science" in our world.
From Tenpenny's "Zero Accountability in a Failed System" (I mispronounced her name in the episode)
Only three or four strains are selected in the educated guess of which will be most prevalent. But to get a head start usually TWO are not even those found for that flu season! They're instead from the previous year!
But wait! The new ones selected are not even the pure basis for the strain the vaccine creates immunity for!
That's because since they're not sure how well it will replicate in chicken embryos they combine it with another virus which they know replicates well in eggs. So the new strain in the vaccine is a mixed virus, NOT the one identified.
Turns out "they" are not "all the same." Duh. Which is why how DARE that small subsegment imply that criticizing their small group, with their extreme and supremacist views backed by horrific actions, is the same as criticizing them all.
But then again why would they have qualms with misrepresentation when they have a clear goal of destroying non-military targets?
I want you to focus on Mandy's passion bordering on breaking into sheer grief and tears.
THAT is how you should feel when you allow yourself to connect with these horrors.
And if we are to push back against this "they are not us so we care not what happens to them at our hands" mindset and regain our collective humanity, we MUST regularly allow ourselves to ponder it with empathy.
Another easy logic string, that makes abuse of narrative and driving of engineered disasters so easily a part of the regular process that is hard to believe they would not take advantage of it.
Also... not many times on my episodes I have ever used the word "poop." Yet it is relevant here and used generously.
(BTW: "S-PRS" equals SELF Problem-Reaction-Solution)
Regarding the Demon Fearci (A-hole Fauci) quote where he admits without admitting (because... Fauci) that the tests are too sensitive: It’s Just Dead Nucleotides. Period.
Good Ole Flip Flop Fauci...He knew about the cycle threshold and PCR testing a LONG time ago....
TWiV 641 (This Week in Virology) (4:09 is where upon the hosts asking if we could have a viral load cutoff to declare someone is no longer infectious, the demon states the academic truth of a cycle threshold at 35 or above meaning basically a false positive, but of course he never bothered to notice, let alone communicate, to all of the labs nationwide using cycles much higher than that)
What is now is sort of evolving, into a bit of a standard, that if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, that the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule. So that if somebody, and you know, we do, we have patients, and it's very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians, somebody comes in and they repeat their PCR and it's like 37 cycle threshold. But you never, you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think
...if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you gotta say, you know it's just dead nucleotides, period.
RELATED EPISODES OF THE SCALES OF TRUTH
(links are to audioboom, but those links will then give you links to some other main podcast platforms):
Congrats. As a Chiefs fan, I can appreciate the joy of ending a drought of a half-century (or so).
Plain and simple, the Knicks were just the better clutch team by far. A well-balanced team with maturity, anchored by an offensive master craftsman in Brunson.
In revisiting QROT-063 to add details to the episode, I ordered the journal articles into a logic string that really just tells the story, basically just from the titles of the articles.
(Related episodes include TSOT025, TSOT026, QROT-080)
The logic string (then repeated further down with the articles listed. See the full cites at the QROT-063 show description or by following the links.
====================================================
1. Graphene oxide (and by implications most or all of these artificially-small nanoparticles) are toxic. Graphene-Based Nanomaterials Toxicity in Fish.
* Graphene oxide interaction with Lemna minor: Root barrier strong enough to prevent nanoblade-morphology-induced toxicity.
* Sublethal toxicity of graphene oxide in Caenorhabditis elegans under multi-generational exposure.*
* Toxicity Studies on Graphene-Based Nanomaterials in Aquatic Organisms: Current Understanding.
* Phytotoxicity of Graphene Family Nanomaterials and Its Mechanisms: A Review*.*
* Toxicological Evaluation of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials.
* Cytotoxicity of Graphene Oxide and Graphene in Human Erythrocytes and Skin Fibroblasts.
* Biomolecular Interactions and Biological Responses of Emerging Two-Dimensional Materials and Aromatic Amino Acid Complexes.
* Hard corona composition and cellular toxicities of the graphene sheets.
* Graphene Oxide Touches Blood: In Vivo Interactions of Bio-Coronated 2D Materials**.
2. But we're GOING to use them anyway.
(because "new tech", so we'll get the FDA approval and can charge greater prices, and our tech can be patentable! Who cares if it is really more effective than 100-year-old treatments or anywhere near as safe!!) COVID-19 Vaccine Frontrunners and Their Nanotechnology Design.
* Graphene oxide: a carrier for pharmaceuticals and a scaffold for cell interactions.
* Graphene and graphene oxide as new nanocarriers for drug delivery applications.
* Crucial Role of Lateral Size for Graphene Oxide in Activating Macrophages and Stimulating Pro-inflammatory Responses in Cells and Animals. [Touches on toxicity and "safety" approaches too]
* Graphene: A Comprehensive Review*.
3. We have an excuse anyway - adjuvants MUST have some toxicity, AND we can use them as a platform / carrier to deliver the "drugs" or "vaccines" to parts of the body they wouldn't otherwise reach. Nanomaterial-based vaccine adjuvants*.
4. We'll "mitigate" something that is inherently toxic, by making it "less so"
(But REALLY, we'll just "observe" how the body obviously and already mitigates the best it can and we'll call it good) Dependence of Graphene Oxide (GO) Toxicity on Oxidation Level, Elemental Composition, and Size.
* Improved In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility of Graphene Oxide through Surface Modification: Poly(Acrylic Acid)-Functionalization is Superior to PEGylation
* Protein corona-mediated mitigation of cytotoxicity of graphene oxide.
[This one also touches on the next category - tricking the body]
* Hard corona composition and cellular toxicities of the graphene sheets.*
* Protein corona mitigates the cytotoxicity of graphene oxide by reducing its physical interaction with cell membrane*.*
* Insight into the Interaction of Graphene Oxide with Serum Proteins and the Impact of the Degree of Reduction and Concentration**.
5. How we'll TRICK the body into not responding to its full capability to this very toxic load.(Spoiler: They pre-treat it with WEAKENED human blood that does not fully mark it as the threat it is, so that YOUR blood thinks YOUR body already marked it, so it passes through!) Mailänder, Volker & Simon, Johanna & Müller, Laura & Kokkinopoulou, Maria & Lieberwirth, Ingo & Morsbach, Svenja & Landfester, Katharina. (2018). Exploiting the biomolecular corona: Pre-coating of nanoparticles enables controlled cellular interactions.* Nanoscale. 10. 10.1039/C8NR03331E.
MISCELLANEOUS (Not directly relevant to the logic string, but certainly relevant to the rat bastards' plans) Improved Aliivibrio fischeri based-toxicity assay: Graphene-oxide as a sensitivity booster with a mobile-phone application.
* The Molecular Influence of Graphene and Graphene Oxide on the Immune System Under In Vitro and In Vivo Conditions.
[This one appears to be, but I've not delved, more about hybrid bioengineered nanomaterial, see also an article called The Hybrid Nano-Biointerface between Proteins/Peptides and Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials]
* Biological Interactions of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials: An Interdisciplinary Review*.
A follow-up to QROT-197 (“Jabs Cause Huge Increase in IgG4. Which Massively Reduces Immune Responses").A walk down of the scientific journal article "receipts." This proves beyond any doubt what any of their experts MUST have known through application of the most basic principles of their profession.
TLDL: 1. Massive exposure to an antigen (any molecule capable of inducing an immune response (to produce an antibody) in the host organism) results in IgG-4 increasing. This is such a known phenomena that we have "IgG-4 Related (Systemic) Disease."
2. IgG-4's effect is to slow down the immune response to the invader.
Where they happily admit it usually is when the result stops "allergic hypersensitivity"
3. mRNA Covid jabs have been shown to massively increase (by 500 TIMES) IgG-4 for the spike protein.
Not immediately, but after enough boosters. This does NOT occur with other types of vaccines (not that mRNA coding jab is a vaccine, but that's what they call it so they get immunity from lawsuits)
4. The reason, cited by the journals as well, is that since mRNA makes the body create the spike protein with no real limiting factor, you then eventually get too many created (and the literature has shown they persist in the body for a long time).
5. You now have the massive exposure required for your body to decide it needs to put the brakes on the immune response to the spike protein.
6. This results in the "vaccine" causing worse "breakthrough infections" from what it "protects" us from (infections that occur despite the vaccine having been administered.
=======================================================
EPISODE TIMELINE AND NOTES
0:00 Teaser Quotes
1:34 Intro This regards the topic that I was introduced to via The Tenpenny Files. The guest Dr David Rasnick, worked with Peter Duesberg. Is an expert on the chromosomal imbalance (aneuploidy) theory of cancer. Book “The Outsider: A Personal Odyssey into the Essence of Cancer.”
* What we’re covering here is more specific than his entire book. It’s his claim that an increase in IgG-4 (the unusual antibody that “puts the brakes on” the immune response) is increased as a result of multiple jabs, therefore allowing covid-19 infections rather than preventing it.
* Related is the idea of this increased IgG-4 and immune response suppression outside of the Covid-19 jab, and also then extending the logic to how cancers can be more serious since the immune system is also what protects us against cancer.
* I have not read his book, and this is not a recitation of it. Rather, it is me, as is my way, sometimes deep-diving to see if someone’s claim has a basis in published science, and laying out that proof and the logical sequence*.
* That logical sequence, which is also how the rest of the episode is structured is as follows:
+ What is IgG-4?
+ IgG-4 and its KNOWN application regarding reducing allergic reactions
+ IgG-4 and its general application to immune suppression
+ IgG-4 Related Disease, as a proof of the mechanism
+ IgG-4 increased by the jab
+ IgG-4 and increased cancer
+ The Jab and increased cancer
8:08 What is IgG-4?
Immunoglobulins are antibodies. IgG-4 a particular subclass of the IgG class of antibody.
13:34 IgG-4 and its known application regarding reducing allergic reactions
26:10 IgG-4 and its general application to immune suppression* Brave search question: Would a massive IGG-4 increase theoretically result in immune system being less active? Then backed up by the associated journal articles. * A repetition from the basics as applied in allergen context, since allergens are antigens, and things that come into your body to effect “disease” are also antigens, subject to the immune system response. * “effectively dampening immune activation”
32:21 IgG-4 Related Disease as proof of the mechanism Was called IgG-4 Related SYSTEMIC Disease. Then they decided they should bury that more clear title. * A chronic inflammatory condition, characterized by tissue infiltration with lymphocytes, IgG4-secreting plasma cells, and various degrees of fibrosis (scarring). + a type of white blood cell, and include t-cells, b-cells, innate lymphoid cells, of which natural killer cells are an important subtype. * An ASIDE emphasis on a journal article stating as plain background in a consensus statement on the pathology of IG-4 Related Disease, where it confirms that IgG-4 rises often 10 to 100 fold during successful allergen immunotherapy, the "increase correlates directly with the development of human tolerance, where the immune system stops overreacting to the allergen.*" IT'S ALL RELATED
36:51 IgG-4 increased by the jab IgG-4 antibodies can surpass all other IgG antibodies developed towards the spike protein, rising consistently from an average of 0.04% after the second immunization to 19.27% after the third one * CORRECTION: Note my verbal slip at 42:12. + In discussing IgG-4 going from 0.04% to over 19% I talked through the math, but then instead of saying that that was almost a 500-fold increase, I accidentally said a 500% increase. That’d be wrong, in that 500% would only be a five-fold increase. Indeed the almost 500-fold increase is what is accurate. * Per journal article, factors of this massive increase in IgG-4 are time since last jab, and whether you have continuous exposure to the spike protein + (yet we know now that spike protein persists in the body for up to YEARS) * But this increase does not occur with traditional vaccines + (LOGIC is SIMPLE – I explain it. The “code” makes your body CREATE a LOT of spike protein versus the small amount introduced by the other types of vaccines) * The increase also does not occur among those vaccinated after they’ve had actual Covid-19 * ASIDE: Plain and simple non-controversial statement as background that this covid vaccine and many others “do not produce sterilizing immunity, allowing people to suffer frequent re-infections.” * 65:50 ASIDE: Journal article stating plainly how the UK ONS findings entirely disagree with the US pat lying answer as to effectiveness, AND mentions all-cause mortality increase (versus pre-covid), for periods of time after vaccines had been introduced, in proportion to the level to which they were administered by country, in a study involving data from 31 countries.* * 69:38 Construction of nanotubes (!!! :-O )
71:17 IgG-4 and increased cancer Increased IgG-4 found in either blood or tissues or both in esophageal cancer, melanoma, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer*. * Also a larger % of IgG-4 is associated with worst clinical outcomes for the cancer.
79:42 Summarizing it all
=========================================Quotes used at beginning of episodes IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein
* In conclusion, these findings show that, like younger individuals, older adults produce antibodies with reduced functional capacity upon repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination
* Repeated mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations cause a significant increase in SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG4 antibodies, a subclass typically associated with immune tolerance rather than viral clearance. While IgG4 is initially undetectable after primary doses, it rises extensively six months post-second dose and can become the dominant IgG subclass after the third or fourth mRNA booster*, replacing IgG1 in some individuals.
* [T]he possible link between the spike protein immunoglobulin G4 antibodies and cancer progression
+ Repeated inoculation with messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines elicits immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) antibody production.* Such an increase in the concentration of specific and non-specific IgG4 antibodies allows the growth of some types of cancer* by blocking the activation of effector immune cells.
==================================================
References used in Podcast Episode
ThermoFisher Scientific Introduction to Immunoglobulins
ThermoFisher Scientific Immunoglobulin IgG Class
James, L.K., Till, S.J.Potential Mechanisms for IgG4 Inhibition of Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 16, 23 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-016-0600-2
Shi LL, Xiong P, Yang M, Ardicli O, Schneider SR, Funch AB, Kiykim A, Lopez J, Akdis CA, Akdis M. Role of IgG4 Antibodies in Human Health and Disease. Cells. 2025 Apr 25;14(9):639. doi: 10.3390/cells14090639. PMID: 40358163; PMCID: PMC12071442.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IgG4-related_disease
Deshpande, Vikram, Yoh Zen, John KC Chan, Eunhee E Yi, Yasuharu Sato, Tadashi Yoshino, Günter Klöppel, et al. 2012. Consensus statement on the pathology of IgG4-related disease. Modern Pathology 25(9): 1181–1192.
Gelderloos, A.T., Verheul, M.K., Middelhof, I. et al. Repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination results in IgG4 class switching and decreased NK cell activation by S1-specific antibodies in older adults. Immun Ageing 21, 63 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-024-00466-9
References mentioned but not quoted from during episode:
Irrgang P, Gerling J, Kocher K, Lapuente D, Steininger P, Habenicht K, et al. Class switch toward noninflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Sci Immunol. 2023;8(79):eade2798.
Kiszel P, Sik P, Miklos J, Kajdacsi E, Sinkovits G, Cervenak L, Prohaszka Z. Class switch towards spike protein-specific IgG4 antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination depends on prior infection history. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13166.
Buhre JS, Pongracz T, Kunsting I, Lixenfeld AS, Wang W, Nouta J, et al. mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 induce comparably low long-term IgG Fc galactosylation and sialylation levels but increasing long-term IgG4 responses compared to an adenovirus-based vaccine. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1020844.
Akhtar M, Islam MR, Khaton F, Soltana UH, Jafrin SA, Rahman SIA, et al. Appearance of tolerance-induction and non-inflammatory SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after COVID-19 booster vaccinations. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1309997.
Yoshimura M, Sakamoto A, Ozuru R, Kurihara Y, Itoh R, Ishii K, et al. The appearance of anti-spike receptor binding domain immunoglobulin G4 responses after repetitive immunization with messenger RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. Int J Infect Dis. 2024;139:1–5.
Selva KJ, Ramanathan P, Haycroft ER, Reynaldi A, Cromer D, Tan CW, et al. Preexisting immunity restricts mucosal antibody recognition of SARS-CoV-2 and Fc profiles during breakthrough infections. JCI Insight. 2023;8(18):e172470.
Kalkeri R, Zhu M, Cloney-Clark S, Plested JS, Parekh A, Gorinson D, et al. Altered IgG4 Antibody Response to Repeated mRNA versus Protein COVID Vaccines. medRxiv. 2024.
The Spurs (lowercase) goats are Wemby, Fox, and Mitch.
Hey, they're ALL young, so it's not the end of the world. But it is a lost opportunity. a HUGE pivot that should have and could have resulted in home court advantage regained after losing the first TWO at home.
It didn't have to get all the way away from them. And by definition it should not have, since it is the biggest Finals lead ever punted away. We look at the big causes, and the specific detailed mistakes in the final minutes.
Well, it ain't good. But we are way ahead of schedule. Lessons probably won't be learned in time for this series, but that doesn't make them not true.
Kind of a quick alert of truth. Vital information first heard from David Rasnick during his appearance on The Tenpenny Files, and then easily verified via search for relevant journal articles.
CAVEAT: As always with sports episodes, please realize I consider sports literally not the one-billionth most important thing on the planet. If you want to know the various things I consider more important, look at my other topics. I say that caveat to say that for sports I am just not going to do that much research. *So either my feelings or observations are gonna be on, or maybe they won't be, and maybe entirely wrong.
But hey, I don't feel too bad - didn't Chuck pick Cavs to come out of the East after the Harden trade?**. :-D
It's to have fun. Please take it as such.*
TLDL: Spurs have a lot of room for improvement, but as at times in Western Conference Finals, actually need to address it, or they are well are on their way to losing the series. The Knicks are GOOD, and even versus the previous (albeit injured) opponent who won last year, are a UNIQUE challenge.
Go Spurs Go.
0:00 Intro
1:26 ASIDE on my initial attempt to hard-wire my home so I don't have wi-fi exposure.
3:21 A related and good "preface" episode is TSOT153, "Suspicions Confirmed on Big Tech Censorship Based on You Trying to be MORE Nuanced and Careful." We review some of the concepts and details from there, particularly those things that show in the individual episode image file.
12:48 Introducing the substack that shows this material (sagehana.substack.com)
Psalm 137, 8-9 Paraphrasing... Blessed will be those who hit the babies of the enemies against a rock.
13:36 But don't take the text's plain meaning for it, hear the audio from a Rabbi. The "rules of the torah."
14:45 Or from a second Rabbi. "even babies who breastfeed"
14:56 An elderly IDF Army Reservist telling active IDF soldiers what needs to be done (audio). Finish them off. Don't leave anyone behind. Erase the memory of them. Erase them - their families, mothers, and children. . . . Complete destruction.
17:16 Two scholars or rabbis in a row. 2nd one: There is no PERMISSION from the Torah to have ANY mercy whatsoever during war. Not on children, not on women, not on anybody.
21:01 Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi: (paraphrasing) Christians are among the six billion "idol worshippers who every second of their lives. They are worshipping a false idol just as much as any of the rest of the religions around the world. "According to the Torah, do not have the right to live." "Deserve death penalty."
. . .
. . .
(So... "Judeo-Christian tradition" huh?? Pull your head out, Israel-first Christians - they believe you are worshiping an IDOL. Do you believe Jesus is a golden calf, or not?).
J.D. Vance - is he realizing the flip script in the moment, as "miracles when you believe" is sung behind him, and in now way, shape, or form is it about Christianity.
25:22 Republican Jewish Coalition, and what one big wig (Miriam Adelson) says about Trump (SPOILER: It ain't a good look if you believe in MAGA, but is a GREAT look if you believe in MIGA)
26:56 Compromised Indiana Republican "tool" (in two ways) Congressman Marlin Stutzman is happy to be on his leash. Within days of visiting with the Yahu in Jerusalem, drafting resolutions about Yahu's plan (HIS words - "my plan") to get Israel further tentacled into even the "co-development" of weapons. ("shift the framework for US-Israel defense cooperation from aid to partnership") On the main floor of even as we conceptualize in the alleged UNITED STATES military-industrial complex!
Why? Because, duh... Israel can have even a GREATER benefit, with immediate secrets and knowledge and capability and policy making, AND on the surface actually make direct aid to Israel less and less (because being directly where all the secrets are, is more EFFECTIVE and valuable than direct aid).
30:03 Unrepentant spy : Jonathan Pollard, one of the worst spies against the U.S. ever caught, after 30 years says in The Times of Israel that it is too bad most American Jews do not consider themselves less American. He says even now he'd urge American Jews in the security and intelligence community to spy for Israel.
32:46 Finally, REALLY to the letter from the Yahu to Representative Stutzman.
40:10 The compromised Congressman happily appearing on a video for AIPAC, saying he visited the 10/7 memorial. He empathizes, allegedly, so much with human suffering that one wonders if he insisted upon seeing first hand the razing of Gaza city, and the forced removal of Palestinian home owners from their property.
47:04 A brief look into the "6 Billion don't have a right to live" Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi. Wikipedia page. "Leading Orthodox Jewish Outreach Rabbi." While Wikipedia does describe controversies, his Wikipedia page is not getting the standard "character assassination" treatment that operatives will do to others. Also, I wondered if calls to remove him from Torah Anytime actually resulted in said removal. Looking after the recording, I can confirm his material is still there. His regular web site is full and active, and he outreaches for over four hours a week in presentations in NYC.
(I lay out ranges, but do not try to predict the series. I'll say it here though - If Spurs win, it takes five to seven games. If Knicks win, it takes six or seven. The "chess match" of this series is an intriguing of one as we've seen in a while)
An odd nuance... Wemby the "Most Important Player". Because almost always a season MVP has a very polished offensive game. Wemby can go off, but is not near the polish of a Shai, Hakeem, Jordan, and so on. But 'dat DEFENSE 'do does make him the Most Important.
(Just making it to the Finals though, puts a different spin on his season MVP chances next year, and I think voters take his full game into account, and he could have a three-year run as MVP or longer, or like 3 out of 5 or something. Kinda like when they started to not give the MVP to MJ or to LeBron basically because it would be "boring" to.
Unique challenge of this Knicks team that is on a roll in the playoffs the likes of which we haven't otherwise seen.
The luck of a young team in the Spurs already facing an offensive master, particularly one who can navigate in traffic really well and hit mid-range shots. Seems a bit like Jalen Brunson.
But KAT. Anunoby, Hart, Bridges, Mitchell. Bigger wings than OKC even though OKC, pre-injury had almost historically rare depth.
Thoughts on whether OKC should "stay put" or "move / panic."
0:00 Intro
Including brief commentary on The Better Way Conference, and the legend I got a signed copy of a book from.
1:54 The only time I've ever been algorithmically censored on Telegram, and my anecdotal conclusions as to why (since it didn't TELL me why). SPOILER: It was when I used a more specific term when criticizing the Israeli regime, and I used that term to specifically call out that I was not talking about Jews in general, or Israelis in general, but instead the much smaller subset of people responsible for the more extremist and supremacist outlooks and actions.
6:22 The 2021 Intercept article that backs up my anecdote.
Despite fact facebook gave the impression in 2021 that such policies of equating the more specific term with the general term, in reality the policy existed at least since 2019.
15:58 Aside, on World Economic Forum Young Global Leaders (asshats Zuckerberg and Katherine Maher, both with their clear censorship agendas and actions, are two), and how in no way, shape, or form are their allegiances EVER towards the principles of their own country.
24:16 Quote from facebook guidance for content moderators.
26:49 The (convenient) irony of how their fake example for when content moderators should censor is an exact scenario of when a regime responsible for such actions would justifiable be criticized (when property rights of others are demolished literally and figuratively).
28:23 An Electronic Frontier Foundation director's opinion on matter.
29:41 More proof of ipso factor First Amendment violations, as facebook admits it both listens to government attempts to DELETE posts or accounts based on viewpoint, and follows through on some of them.
30:06 My aside on 2020 "Constitutional Scholars" from the left, and their willing ignorance on the likelihood (which beared out) that government really was coordinating with the government in their censorship.
32:19 An example of literally WHY the shadow-banned more specific term they're banning is important - an article from a Jewish independent news site at least implying criticism about an Israeli-intelligence influenced app to encourage Jews to crowd report posts and comments for deletion. (ALMOST like its valid to point out that they don't all agree with each other, by using a term to differentiate those with more extreme views. WHOOOOAAA.)
32:53 My personal story of being blindsided with being name-called anti-Semitic when all I was doing was empathizing with the terrorizing ordeal of humans having their residential homes bulldozed.
37:09 Closing
A question from the audience from the World Council for Health's 2026 Better Way Conference.
When a dictate forces you to violate the sanctity of your body as a matter of course, regardless of your desires, after you have spent untold hours and probably a couple hundred thousand dollars, it is the moment of the last test of if you will serve an uncaring system by doing the same bullying to the public.
A continued preview of concepts covered by experts who will be at the Better Way Conference 2026.
This time some highlights of concepts by Dr. Beverly Rubik, on what 4G and 5G do to blood, and my parallel on how earthing (/grounding) helps blood.
Observations on why this is great cause for concern (spoiler - it's about circulation, which is, umm, kind of important for health).
And the factor of the real reason being another concept pushed on us behind the scenes despite no citizen needing or asking for it (Internet of Things, such as your toaster reporting to the internet for no sane reason, given the increased electromagnetic stew it puts us in).
And alternatives. Wait what.. we could use cables all the way into the house and to the end device, like the 1980s with cable tv, and instead of puking the last part of it into the air for no reason. Revolutionary.
What??? Cuba now????!!!!!
While a war no regular American even foresaw as a possibility is about to be ramped up again, helping exactly ONE country primarily, and it isn't abbreviated by "U.S.A."
JFC.
Trump... bro... You've done gone unhinged.
Stop doing the bidding of the most supremacist regime on the planet, and oh I don't know... lemme coin a phrase...instead Make AMERICA Great Again.
All the good will and support from literally a close-call assassination attempt, yet now YOU SIR are the one fortifying the swamp.
YOU sir, are the one fortifying the swamp.
And, worse, actively sabotaging and victimizing those who still believe in draining it.
You are now literally not the peace President.
Nor the economy President.
Literally you are the opposite on both counts.
Who needs Obama's shadow third term fucking up the country when you can do all this bad all by yourself.
So much potential, but Wembanyama is still raw in some ways. Here, as Popp used to famously do, we give him his stuff to work on.
(With a thought or two on Castle's off-season assignment and the refs game 2 performance)
Though the thing is the improvement MAY still be after a victory parade. Scary for rest of league.
But for long term viability he must adjust.
Folks who vid capture, capture it now, including enough context that people can see you navigate to the story.
Look right above top buttoned button of shirt.
Faking a retired ADMIRAL'S persona and opinion.
Disgusting.
Fox news segment from two days ago.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6396048453112
The image capture is mine, from the clip linked above.
Further info on why his persona is being used: "He grew up in Iran and speaks fluent Persian... So if HE thinks we should reduce it to rubble..."
Also... In the "we'll say it but diminish it to trivia" category... Hindustan Times calls it a "row". A row!!!!??? Its universe-class scandal.
I'm ashamed.
"Sparked talks of him wearing a mask"?
Sparked talks??? IT'S A MASK!
"Him wearing a mask"? IF IT'S HIM HE WOULDN'T NEED THE MASK!!!
A Wall Street Journal analysis on how only a very few sharks account for the profitability in poly markets.
Make it a part of your disciplined controlled entertainment budget, with decided limits on your monthly losses. If you make it instead a part of your get rich "it's gonna happen" budget, you might as well be the person playing scratchers repeatedly during each convenience store visit.
Another part of my scouting what some of the participants of the Better Way Conference are about (since I'm attending that conference, and want to have better context and ability to respond and understand and ask questions while there).
This is a follow-up to the last TSOT, in that it is around another document in "Exhibits and References" for Dr. Tess Lawrie's book "Game of Trust."
Directly involved in this case are Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory, who wil both also be in attendance.
What we cover is Marik's and Kory's feedback, via email, of a draft of a peer review of a study on the effectiveness of ivermectin against Covid-19.
In essence, the peer review draft makes caveats and throws cold water on the data in a way that the peer reviewer (Dr. Andrew Hill) in NO WAY had indicated during:
This scandal against truth also literally includes multiple of instances of violations of even the most fundamental aspects of how these peer reviews are done.
This is an exhibit in behind-the-scenes strong-arm tactics and/or incentivization and invisible authors to tone down the on-the-record conclusion of science that would save more lives more easily at a lower price (but consequently not line as many pockets with anywhere near as much money).
Not an interview. But as I've mentioned I'm trying to scout some of these experts for the 5/29/26 - 5/31/26 Better Way Conference, since I'll be attending.
This preliminary look gives us a sense of Dr. Tess Lawrie's backstory as a truth teller, via a quick look at one of her exhibits from her book.
More specifically, after reading her bio, we dig a little into a main exhibit from chapter one of her book. 1. Exhibit 1: E-BMC Ltd.’s Urgent Rapid Review: Ivermectin reduces the risk of death from Covid-19 (4 January 2021).
Think of this not only as informative generally, but another "Memory Hole" pull so that we never forget what was happening on our planet when it comes to real science and real discussion regarding the most important, life-and-death, health matters, versus the limitations that the establishment were trying to put on both.
At the time (early 2021, the heroic Front Line for Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) brought to the world's attention 27 EXISTING STUDIES on the efficacy of Ivermectin for Covid treatment. But they had not done a meta-analysis across most outcomes and had invited researchers to do so. Dr. Lawrie and The Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy took them up with a "rapid review" to find the commonalities among 15 of these studies. Her conclusions are strong.
For the two primary outcome measures of ten:
1. Moderate certainty evidence (95% Confidence Interval) that ivermectin probably reduces deaths by an average 83%. From 8.4% among participants in the analysis using control, to 1.4% for those using ivermectin.
Underlying episode I'm discussing and riffing on.
Good details on the workings of the "invasion" (and the "Invasion") era.
Details on camps to support those attempting a 59-mile trek through dangerous dense rainforest (the Darién Gap).
*"[A] remote, roadless, and dangerous area of rainforest on the international border between Colombia and Panama."
"Consisting of a large drainage basin, dense rainforest, and mountains, it is known for its remoteness, difficult terrain, and extreme environment,[6] with a reputation as one of the most inhospitable regions in the world."*The main camp to support this illegal immigration, supported openly by the U.S. and by the U. N.'s IOM (International Organization for Migration). Filled with people who openly admit they are not political refugees at all.
A separate China controlled camp, missing children and with very few women. Clearly an exercise by China to get loyal Chinese men into the United States more easily.
5/29 - 5/31 in Warwick, RI.
https://www.betterwayconference.org/#conference
*" [A] two-day conference, seeking solutions to the challenges we presently face within the American healthcare system. The present medical and legal model is broken and now is the time to forge a new path towards healing for all.
This national event brings together many internationally-renowned, expert speakers from the worlds of health freedom such as medicine – both allopathic and natural – science, law, entrepreneurs, policy experts and public officials."*The participants and speakers are THE heroes who came out of the woodwork during the Covid Overreaction Disaster, showing their passion to speak truth regardless of consequences, knowing that the ultimate consequence is whether you are serving humanity. They've appeared before Congress, alongside RFK Jr, and on world-leading podcasts like JRE.
Dr Peter McCullough! Sherri Tenpenny! Del Bigtree! Bret Weinstein. And many others.
https://www.betterwayconference.org/speakers
If you are going, consider finding my email in the description of older episodes (they think it's fake, so I don't add it anymore It's not), and we can say hi!
The, Revolution. Is. Over.
2020 is 2026.
"Betcha Can't Solve a Pandemic Better than Anyone"
equals
"Betcha Can't Have The Most Successful Unauthorized Middle East War Ever."
You a Libertarian yet??
Numerical proof from stathead of the degree of the alien tint to Wembanyama's tendency to insist on threes regardless of his shooting night. On occasion of his latest 0-fer or low percentage night (0 for 8, game 1 of round two, versus Wolves in San Antonio)
Yeah... "Just shoot!" can make sense, for that right role, or when it is hitting, or when there is only so much your body and skill set can offer.
But even then there are limits on nights where it is just not happening.
And when you have potential for outlier performance with other scoring strategies ( like lobs, post-ups, pick and rolls, putbacks), more of a reason to abandon what isn't working.
Wemby could just be "Super Gobert" with almost no offensive responsibilities, and be the basis for a well constructed championship team. But if he's gong to have the offensive gravity they're allowing, then this is an area of improvement that could reap big rewards.
GSG!
Not that there are not lessons learned from the event - I find at least three - but the simplest criticism is possibly misunderstanding the pretty unique physical circumstance of the incident.
Maybe one of the most difficult "range" exercises one could dream up.
Plus some nuance on the "panicking" agents.
This definitely falls into the "mostly unimportant, mostly silly observations" category. But it is an observation on truth.
Yes, your friendly neighborhood Tyson can even find hijinks in goings on with "thumbs up." It's how I do, bruh.
Listen, do what you want with your own reactions. Feel free. I'm not offended.
That said, I will point out the lack of logic regarding this particular case.
Who knew "onions are evil"?!
This one is. Or at least the leadership.
The ridiculous idea that someone's copyrighted ownership of a world-wide brand (infowars) should or could be taken away, and what it reveals about a person who would want to use it, and to do the exact opposite of the original idea.
Never ever trust someone whose root is "comedy" but who also wants to delve in spiteful vengeance just because someone is fully exercising their rights and trying to inform people. It is the former person, not the latter, who should be sued for $1.5 Billion.
Remember, take Alex Jones for what you want, but always know that as much as any news outlet he brings receipts.
And now "infowars" will be someone purposely creating fictional content. Because he didn't like Alex Jones actual reporting.
Irony much?
Kimmel is pretty much a dick, but can be entertaining to some.
But what he did NOT do is ANY call to violence the week of April 19. The facts, with even a scintilla of research, prove it was just an age joke.
For the President to conclude in a hard way that it was about violence is literally the same kind of unnecessary disingenuous rhetoric that inflames unstable sycophants.
We, and by we I mean also Kimmel, have a greater right to the plain meaning and actual intent of the words we utter than other people have the right to misunderstand or to be "offended" by their interpretation.
If either side could consistently act like adults... That'd be great.
A sports analogy of the point first (in the form of an NFL Draft selection story), then a dive into "The Trouble at Dill Creek Farm" as the perfect example about how a fact, there and known early on but kept ignored and therefore undeveloped, meant a team of investigators kept themselves in "the matrix" instead of seeing things for what they were.
Eventually, but years later, they pulled themselves out, but had they noticed "the black cat on the stairs" at the time, it would have saved much time and effort and brought justice quicker.
(CORRECTION: A mis-utterance when mentioning a quick aside on 9-11. I mentioned a lack of debris but stopped there. i meant plane debris at the non-WTC sites. Sometimes with this large of a library you can make too quick of a nod towards what you've said in previous episodes}
More of a "quick rant" in spirit, since the length is a bit much vs typical QROTs.
Early thoughts and impressions and best guess on the authenticity of the event at the White House Correspondents Dinner.
And related ponderings.
A commentary on the truly earth shattering information covered by "Special Investigations" Season 1, Episode 1, "The Nazca Mummies," found on Alien Nation by DUST.
Multiple full-body specimens not just of skeletons, but of intact naturally-mummified bodies.
Not just alleged specimens by some rag tag group, but analyzed by scientists and instrumentation, to the point of not whether it is a fake - they're past that - but to the point of how structures and organs, and even DNA, compare to humans and the rest of the animal world
Victor is an utter All-Worlder, so certainly this is picking nits. But it is still true as far as his quickest path to further dominance.
Victor Wemanyama us clearly on his way to all around greatness, but the sooner he leans into his size offensively, instead of trying to be SuperSize KD, SuperSize Giannis, or SuperSize Westbrook, the sooner that greatness will manifest (and the fewer self-induced faceplant concussions he'll have).
Pff. Funny if not tragic.
In the analogy, if you keep lending tools and money to the neighbor who never returns anything and always breaks his promise... Shame on you.
Let alone when they repeatedly break their promises within a day.
Or in this case, minutes, with the promise being to the world.
Not that it is news. Those who have analyzed it know the definition of their process IS this.
But still, for some it is somehow better to hear it from the horse's mouth.
1. The admission.
2. Even more interesting, that section of the 60 minutes interview is missing from most of the transcripts. But your dude Tyson found it.
CBS News transcript where you CAN find the verbiage
[POWELL:] We're not trying to move markets to a particular level. We just want them to work. We want, you know, people to be buying and selling. And so, you know, it felt like we really needed to act. And we did.
PELLEY: Fair to say you simply flooded the system with money?
POWELL: Yes. We did. That's another way to think about it. We did.
PELLEY: Where does it come from? Do you just print it?
POWELL: We print it digitally. So as a central bank, we have the ability to create money digitally. And we do that by buying Treasury Bills or bonds for other government guaranteed securities. And that actually increases the money supply. We also print actual currency and we distribute that through the Federal Reserve banks.
PELLEY: In terms of size, Mr. Chairman, how does what the Fed is doing right now compare to the unprecedented action it took in 2008?
Also reported in Forbes: Fed Chairman Powell 60 Minutes Interview Highlights Bitcoin’s Value Proposition
"Sometimes, that leads to confidently wrong answers, even on simple things. . . because the system predicts plausible text instead of retrieving verified truth*."
Ohboy.*
0:00: Admission via industry article that AI call centers put in place poorly will give horribly wrong information (Air Canada case)
15:09: Two interactions where I had to know its answers were wrong to finally pull an admission of truth from it.
Then hysterical apologies and explanations of how it can't be accurate a lot of times but sure is sorry for it!
48:23: My accusation that it's no better than a bluffing poorly-prepared 15 year old student, and AI agreeing.
54:24: Admission of its privacy invasion as a main goal and usual course.
57:59: A comedic rendition of "Yeah, THAT'S the ticket" AI giving me directions while walking with me.
A nice look through the catalogue, to refresh long-term listeners, and give new listeners a better idea of what might be worth going back and catching.
(Besides over 360 episodes, also technically over 8.5 years (though really, the bulk is in the last 6.5)
NOTE: Took me longer to edit this, so it really covers through 4/11, but for it to show as a new episode in feeds, I'm dating it 4/14/26. May back date it to its proper sequence after it has been up for a while.
A reminder and reset on what was at the top of the world consciousness right before the Iran War was planted.
What cease fires mean to Israel? A bait-and-switch to just kill others, while they still have cover of "Operation Furious Lion" or whatever the fuck grand name they gave it.
Letter of law versus spirit of law, versus their unquenchable desire to exterminate others, for either just the reason that they are others, or for "Greater Israel", "gaining" land they never controlled.
Moral of Story: Again, WAR, Israel... all you want until the international community ever grows balls enough to stop you in spite of how many you've blackmailed. But that does NOT mean that the United States has to war, with its weapons and soldiers and inflation-causing debt-money, on your behalf.
America, release yourself from the chains of this death machine. SIMPLY look at them with the same eyes of others who would double-cross at every turn even as they're "partnering" with you. If others were that disingenuous, you would not have it. Right, President Bigger Balls Than Any Other President Ever?
So act like it.
I may go off-the-cuff at times. But if I say without reservation that it's proven, it is because it is.
"It is concluded that AZT, at the dosage prescribed as an anti-HIV drug, is highly toxic to human cells."
The adjustment in marketing strategy and dosage that helps prove the point of the dangers they're perfectly well aware of but don't care about.
Plus some refresh on background covered in other episodes on same topic.
BTW, in my off-top-of-head examples of clear indications, I didn't mention among others, ACUTE PANCREATITIS, which may require emergency treatment to avoid DEATH.
But, oh yeah, it's science's "miracle drug."
Popular weight loss drugs linked to rare but severe stomach problems, study finds
"The new research, based on health insurance claims from 2006 to 2020 from more than 5,000 patients in the U.S., looked at how many people developed one of four serious gastrointestinal problems — biliary disease, gastroparesis, pancreatitis or bowel obstructions — after they were prescribed one of the weight loss drugs. About 4,100 of the patients were prescribed liraglutide, about 600 semaglutide and 650 the weight loss drug bupropion-naltrexone, which is not a GLP-1 medication."
...
"People included in the analysis all had records of obesity and did not have diabetes, which itself can cause gastroparesis."
=====================Risk of Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy in Patients Prescribed Semaglutide *"Question Are prescriptions for semaglutide associated with an increased risk of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) in patients with type 2 diabetes or patients who are overweight or obese?
"Findings This matched cohort study of 16 827 patients revealed higher risk of NAION in patients prescribed semaglutide compared with patients prescribed non–glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist medications for diabetes or obesity."
=============================The unseen risk of Ozempic: NAION and vision damage
"According to a study, 6.7% of people who were overweight and 8.9% of those with diabetes who took semaglutide had NAION. The FDA issued a warning regarding counterfeit and compounded products while approving semaglutide for weight loss under the Wegovy® brand. Unsupervised usage and problems with diabetes accessibility raise ethical questions."
. . .
"Semaglutides cause NAION by vascular dysregulation at the optic nerve head, activation of GLP-1 receptors in retinal ganglion cells, and fast glycemic or weight changes that influence perfusion. Patients with packed optic discs or vascular risk factors may be more vulnerable[7]. Many experts are raising concerns about the potential risks that patients may face from these medications. These include side effects like muscle loss, severe side effects like pancreatitis, and kidney and gallbladder issues."
=================================*
The toxicity of azidothymidine (AZT) on human and animal cells in culture at concentrations used for antiviral therapy
"The human dosage is based on a study by the manufacturer of the drug and their collaborators, which reported in 1986 that the inhibitory dose for HIV replication was 0.05 to 0.5 microM AZT and that for human T-cells was 2000 to 20,000 times higher, i.e. 1000 microM AZT. This suggested that HIV could be safely inhibited in humans at 20 to 60 microM AZT. However, after the licensing of AZT as an anti-HIV drug, several independent studies reported 20- to 1000-fold lower inhibitory doses of AZT for human and animal cells than did the manufacturer's study, ranging from 1 to 50 microM. In accord with this, life threatening toxic effects were reported in humans treated with AZT at 20 to 60 microM."
. .."It is concluded that AZT, at the dosage prescribed as an anti-HIV drug, is highly toxic to human cells."
Not the smartest play, but the interesting mix of elements in the situation made it far from just a brain freeze moment.
(CORRECTION: Pardon - I said it was the larger Boozer brother. Point still holds.)
Hmmm.
But now that Kent's said his highly informed opinion, he, like Massie, is persona non grata and being considered for investigation.
Kinda makes his point that MAGA and campaign promises are being betrayed.
An analysis of the effect several years in, and a side discussion on how as imperfect as our skills development pipeline is for basketball players in the States, it is now worse, in that it is now significantly less practically available to American players.
What? The "side effects" that they admitted against interest, in an 8-hour national meeting in late 2020 before it even came out, actually occurred?
Ya don't say.
Only among those single "protected" or "boosted".
(Plus an end dose of opinions on current events)
'*Uh oh... the prominent figure associated with a product I have purchased has turned political heel.
What to do?!!
Why, I surely don't want people to think I might have just bought the product because I like it! I must explain myself to everyone that might see me!!"*
Please Lord, just for pure entertainment, let the President of Subaru come out and express strong opinions about "traditional values."
crosses fingers
[CORRECTION at 2:07, and at least one other time - as indicated by other contrary statements, I TWICE said "first round" instead of "first weekend" regarding at what point KU basketball would be out of the tourney. I meant the latter.]
The failed regular season saga reveals what will be a (short) maddening March.
It's okay to embrace those that are merely "MAGA-adjacent" at best, like Levin, but once the "MAGA President" selects for his biggest repeated rhetorical firepower those MOST loyal to MAGA causes and the truest reform and attainment of justice in America, like Massie and MTG, we have a problem at the top of the movement to such an extent that its pulse should be checked.
Only a pharmacist association and their brethren, would have this concern, of all concerns, about a deadly risky tromp to the edge of WWIII.
But truth seeking / bread crumb following makes strange bedfellows and a chief executive for said association makes an admission against interest regarding the world's "medicine."
Querying for geofenced phone data to make sense of things and potential actors in a crime is a very established technology.
When feds have a hard time solving an infamous crime where key location of suspects is known, not solving the crime is often a sign of a lack of commitment to use this very available informational tool.
Where this was over 7 years ago, for its use to help solve a local crime, illustrates its availability and maturity for other crimes for which "who was in the area at the time" would be key.
A la "pipe bombs" at both DNC and RNC on January 6.
It doesn't PROVE anything, without more. But as to in the classic sense of understanding any case and considering a suspect, one tends to try to understand if they're "capable" of the act. Therein circumstantial evidence is relevant.
From a 2018 book, from a journalist who lives there and has received one of the nation's highest journalistic awards, this history and national policy, along with the well-known "Hannibal Directive" ( I believe I said "Doctrine" in the episode ) helps illuminate the extreme outlook, basically unique among nation states, as to how far they'll go how soon.
Again, not particular evidence of ANYTHING for a specific case, but much like finding out the friendly schoolboy who is an honor roll student has a dark history of a tendency towards violence and/or manipulation, this information MUST color how anyone (and particularly, PRESIDENTS (ahemmm....) and diplomats) deals with this country's leadership.
Goodreads
One key to empathy AND logical analysis of actions is to use a hypothetical to put yourself on the opposite end of the actions to see if you'd then think the actions were just, or rationalized, or humane.
Another key to emoathy and logical anakysis is to not limit yourself to doing the above to only when the perpetrator of the acts is already someone you dislike.
Also, and even MORESO, you should do it when "your side" has done something.
An analogy.
TLDR: In the real world, not the psy-op matrix, neither flesh and bone nor aluminum and steel disintegrate wholly into zero matter upon introduction of massive collision or explosion.
(UPDATE: I stupidly said I wouldn't vote for DJT next time. D'OH!!! So inserted an "I'm aware"warning,but I'm not going to otherwise edit it - everything else holds, and the surgery wouldn't be precise. Consider the sentiment more like "I can't believe I left my Libertarian voting ways, and then he does THAT!)
BUTTHURTEDNESS WARNING: If you're susceptible, put on protective equipment or listen to something else. Podcasts cannot override your consent unless someone has tied your hands behind your back. In which case you have worse problems.
A far-flung rant, granted with justifiably irritated tone, over the latest activities that are NOT about Making America Great Again, and related analysis and topics.
I think DJT might be misspelling MAGA.
Due to people "calling him chicken."
Maybe we should get back to the people's mission for him, instead of helping other countries be more murderous AGAIN.
If not (and I don't expect it), one, the "Republicans" are losing the mid-terms in a landslide, and two, zero chance I'm doing anything except turning back to my Libertarian roots in 2028.
A perfectly good way, through official Microsoft open source application available on github, to make easier and more obvious how to mute and unmute your microphone (and shut your camera off).
Gone.
Never mind if people want it, or if it a common sense feature that SHOULD just be a feature in Windows already, without having to download an extended features app.
You want privacy, or at the very least not to be embarrassed by a mistake during a large conference call?
Too bad. THEY find your privacy inconvenient. Your rights be damned.
Unpacking Travis' comments and how they dovetail with Patrick's sentiment before the hire.
(CORRECTION NOTE: At about 2 minutes I said wild card round was first time Allen had game winning drive in overtime, but I meant the first game winning drive in the playoffs.)
TLDL: FIRE MATT NAGY.
Greenland for "Golden Dome"??
HAARP, anyone.
MAGA is now, at best, 5th priority.
The psy op was easy.
"What are ya, Donald? Chicken??!"
"Bet you can't do what other Presidents couldn't do."
There is no hope left.
Vote Libertarian.
A second look into the numbers. This one featuring revisiting the dazzling heights in average fantasy points per game that Patrick Mahomes attained in his first five years of starting, versus the sharp (really unprecedented for an elite QB in his prime) decline upon Nagy's arrival as OC.
It's not just that Nagy has to leave. May he do well on the rest of his journeys. But it is also that Andy can't just be the venerable grandpa just believing somehow that because heights WERE reached years ago, that everyone is going to self correct and go back to the levels of the 2022 season and before. They have NOT. Let alone now that Kelce's exit is imminent. Andy HAS to enforce those tough quality control processes being reinstituted.
Patrick, by EVERY means, SHOULD have continued to have almost year after year of top 100 fantasy points seasons all time. And instead they stopped abruptly. And always remember, his MOST productive year, yards-wise AND in team results, was AFTER Tyreek left. So don't give me the "he had an elite receiver and that was the only reason" gar-BAGE.
Though I did more with the numbers than what this query shows, the basis for these numbers come from this sports-reference / stathead query:
Thanks for listening!
Not a study from Tyson's Conspiracy Corner. A study from Tufts and Brown University.
"TYSON, you don't know who cyber attacked it!"
I mean, technically you're right. But I'm imagining it is less likely that just Harold the Hacker, with no stakes about it, just decided to take down a scientific journal website. In other words, as Andy Dufresne might say - don't be so obtuse.
Daily Mail:
*"A global review examining reported cases of cancer following Covid vaccination was published earlier this month, just as the medical journal hosting it was hit by a cyberattack that has since taken the site offline.
The study appeared in the peer-reviewed journal Oncotarget on January 3 and was authored by cancer researchers from Tufts University in Boston and Brown University in Rhode Island."*
At top of the website, which can be accessed at the moment I write this:
"In December 2025 and January 2026, our server encountered malicious cyberattacks that led to disruptions of online publications and website access.
The Dark side of PubPeer: there are suspicions that certain individuals associated with PubPeer may have been involved in cybercriminal activities, including hacking servers, causing journal websites to go offline, and using illegitimate practices to influence Google search results for journals and scientists."Full text of article. One author:Wafik El-Deiry, MD, PhD, FACP is the Associate Dean for Oncologic Sciences at the Warren Alpert Medical School, Director of the Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, and Director of the Joint Program in Cancer Biology at Brown University and affiliated hospitals. He is an American Cancer Society Research Professor, Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Professor of Medical Science, and Mencoff Family University Professor at Brown University. He is a licensed practicing physician-scientist and Medical Oncologist in Rhode Island and Pennsylvania with clinical privileges at The Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital in Providence, Rhode Island.
(second topic I mention in the intro is actually going to be split into a different episode)
Anywhere else you'd say "the thing you want to sell is worth what it will sell for, assuming the market is quite aware of you offering it."
But not in real estate.
In real estate, the hypnotized industry instead tells their clients, who WANT to sell their houses or they wouldn't be trying, that the price the market will bear is insulting. So a house, that SOMEONE WOULD BUY at a lower price, sits.
And sits.
And sits.
How can that be???!!! In the day and age of ebay and amazon and online listings?? It's SHELTER. Therefore it is in demand!! IF the buyers and sellers get to meet at the right price!
What is the motivation? How many blue pills (the other kind) do these agents (agents, blue pill, matrix... interesting) gulp every day????
The house is NOT work $400K if you do not even get offers at that price for months and months on end.
So do you want to sell it for much more than you bought it for or not? Even if that much more is only $250K versus your purchase price of $175K, instead of the extra $150K that your real estate Agent Smith is telling you (that you'll never get anyway).
The reasoning, I INSIST, is these evil bastards who want you to have fewer options. They build a world of scarcity so that they're relatively more rich and relatively more in control. Even as young couples every year WANT a place where they can grow their family, their legacy, and their equity.
There are no hanging trees high enough . . .
The NFL statistical numbers I said I'd deliver to help people who have not had a chance to give the argument that the Chiefs have turned into an offensive disaster under the Nagy-Reid partnership a true eye test.
TLDL - Significantly worse numbers in all possible ways to look at it. Certainly in comparing Nagy versus the Bieniemy years, and sometimes starkly even as we look at 2025 (with Rice back) versus the much less capable receiving corps in theory from last year. See Profootballreference tiny URLs below.
Another TLDL: FIRE. MATT. NAGY.
Or if you don't support that, then be a contrarian and watch Patrick's legacy and reputation go further into the toilet. From right on track for second-best ever, to maybe even not another chapter of highest success in his story.
| https://www.sports-reference.com/stathead/tiny/IN0Qc - All six five-game spans within the same regular season where Patrick Mahomes' TD passes did not exceed his interceptions have occurred in the last 16 months, smack dab in the heart of the Nagy era.
| https://www.sports-reference.com/stathead/tiny/sk65Y - Of 13 instances where Patrick threw at least five interceptions total over a five-game regular-season span in same season, and he threw 1.5 times or less as many TDs as interceptions, 10 of the 13 were in the Nagy era.
| https://www.sports-reference.com/stathead/tiny/AE2wJ - Only eight instances where Patrick threw at least five interceptions total over a five-game regular-season span in same season, and he threw only 1.3 times as many TDs as interceptions. over five regular season games, Seven of eight were in the Nagy era.
| https://www.sports-reference.com/stathead/tiny/B3vNS - Only six instances where over five regular season games in same season, Patrick threw at least five INTs and did not throw more TDs then interceptions. Five of the six times were in the last 16 months, smack dab in the Nagy era.
| https://www.sports-reference.com/stathead/tiny/mNxXT - Only twice has Patrick had five-game stretches with combined completion percentage below 60%. Both were in the Nagy era, in the 2025 season, when the full complement of receivers were available.
| https://www.sports-reference.com/stathead/tiny/Xp3hm - Only four times prior to the 2025 season did Patrick have five-game stretches in the same season with a combined completion percentage even below 62%. But two more (and easily the lowest) occurred in 2025.
| https://www.sports-reference.com/stathead/tiny/3TsmG - Basis for other metrics, including the percentage of completed air yards versus intended, total yards per season, total yards per game, rating, and others.
Receipts delivered.
Three examples.
One that could have brought justice.
One that could deliver adequate customer service.
One that could really help a business entities bottom line.
So while Erika can feel free to share an opinion, we can feel free to understand it has no inherent persuasive or conclusive value.
A path of purposeful and causative chaos they laid over four years ago. For some reason this death and destruction is their commitment above all other commitments.
One thing for sure is that it serves the purpose o not one common European, let alone the lot of them.
But serving the purpose of the common European citizen is hardly ever something that either NATO or the EU do.
What, he still refuses to spare the remnant of his native fighting age men by agreeing to peace?
Ya don't say.
Why it's almost like he doesn't actually care about their fate at all and is instead allegiant to a cause where the more of them die the better.
And by "almost" I mean exactly.
A follow-up to TSOT103 & TSOT105, upon them arresting a suspect.
Those who won't go on record say the black suspect is a Trump supporter, while his grandmother on record says he's not political, near autistic, literally lives in his mom's basement, and his biggest concern recently was the loss of his beloved chihuahua.
Cmon, man.
He may be A guy. But the likelihood THIS guy bought parts over the course of a year, built, and planted TWO pipe bombs* purely of his own motivations?
. . .
???
Come on, man.
*And, if Trump supporter, why a pipe bomb at the RNC too? Cmon, man.
A Cursed filled review of the big picture.
(TLDL/TLDR: Fire Matt Nagy NOW!!!!!)
It ain't chess. Especially when you have a good QB.
When you make it chess instead of checkers on offense you're just mysticizing instead of being directly and easily effective.
Since late February 2023, the Chiefs have spiraled to chess instead of checkers, ironically over complicating their thinking but fielding an evermore overly simplistic offense that takes no advantage of how designed plays can help get guys open. To zero positive offensive net gain versus before late February 2023.
Such that even the institutional memory of what to do in big situations is nearly lost.
To the detriment of Patrick's legacy, such that right now, even when he needed to be dialed in for goals, he has played easily (and it isn't CLOSE) the worst five game stretch of his career, not looking like a top 20 QB, let alone what the real Patrick Mahomes should look like.
The offense is bad again, relying almost exclusively on scrambling. Short and long-term trends, and ramifications.
Two stats that highlight what is going on, backed up by the blindingly bright eye test from the last four weeks.
Spoiler Alert: The offense has been on a downward trajectory beginning on February 24, 2023. The trendline has been in one direction from that moment through to the moment of 0:00 on the clock on Thanksgiving day 2025.
DeMarcus and Tyson Preview and Predict Week 9, leaving Chiefs for last. Due to various complexities, rely on us for entertainment only even more, and not any kind of sense of being informally, God forbid, for betting purposes. We'd missed a couple of weeks and did not want to miss another. So more off-the-cuff, by a landslide, than most of our NFL previews.
Pardon the few interjections here and there of the lament that is the Chiefs season on a downslide. We get back to the games at hands fairly quickly.
Probably will mean we somehow pick more accurately. :-D
0:00 Intros and Pleasantries, including adventures in Columbia, Mo with a Mizzou game.
1:51 Extra evidence of MU-KU bitterness
5:32 NFL Preview Start
6:25 Jets at Ravens false start (Chiefs interjection)
7:58 Jets at Ravens, f'real
10:58 Steelers at Bears
14:03 Patriots at Bengals
17:52 Giants at Lions
21:22 Vikings at Packers
24:22 Seahawks at Titans
26:28 Jaguars at Cardinals
29:40 Browns at Raiders (TIED at 2-8!!)
38:15 Eagles at Cowboys
44:25 Falcons at Saints
49:01 Buccaneers at Rams
55:42: Panthers at 49ers
62:32 Colts at Chiefs
From a (pretty tame, NON-Nick-Wright) Chiefs fan perspective.*
Chiefs at Bills (Sunday afternoon)
Closing thoughts and shoulder punching, including Demarcus wondering about the sexual preference of the entire state to the west of his.
*Since before the 2-14 season, and BEFORE Matt Cassel was the "big upgrade" at QB, so don't think we can't empathize a little with regular fandom.
Love this guy. Joe Hoft. I knew nothing of him, but the ether brought him to me.
[My new Sports Scales of Truth listeners - here's where you are warned if regular, non-sports content may bother you. ;-) ]
Not "breaking news" as he is saying here, in the sense that the capture here is not a recent one.
But it is still about a very important topic, and a great repetition of not gaslighting yourself. Remember, URGENTLY and "RANTILY" to be stubborn about things you know.
And be stubborn about important, KEY pivots, issues, and facts.
Do not let everyone else impliedly or expressly moving on to the next topic make you think that the important thing you were focusing on is no longer worthy of speaking of, or of going back to to continue the fact-finding or discussion.
Bad offensive 1st half, exceptional defense whole game, excellent offense second half.
Overall, a professional outing, taking care of business as necessary in a very tight AFC West, with Indy and the Pats having a chance to go hide out front in the AFC playoff seeding.
0:00 Intro, high-level thoughts, some game background.
5:21 Commanders' first drive
5:32 Chiefs' first drive
6:40 Commanders' second drive
7:51 Chiefs' second drive
8:34 Commanders' third drive
10:22 Chiefs' third drive
13:31 Commanders' fourth drive
14:51 Chiefs' fourth drive (last before halftime)
16:39 Chiefs' fifth drive (first in second half)
20:32 Commanders' fifth drive
21:39 Chiefs' sixth drive
26:06 Commanders' sixth drive
30:06 Chiefs' seventh drive
35:23 Wrap-up of rest of game
38:07 Box Score Discussion
Final thoughts for this game and going forward.
Sheesh. sometimes I'm slow.
I've covered the Steele "Dossier," or, rather, the Steele Falsified Hearsay Fable, plenty.
And I've talked about the likelihoods of Trump's involvement with Epstein, give or take Trump's (idiotic, unnecessary, negligent) dismissing of the entire scandal.
But I've never connected the dots.
Here, input from Assange and the Wikileaks release of emails from Hilary's Secretary of State emails (off of her should-be-illegal private server) helps us clarify.
(And gives us insight on the ever-predictable corruption of HRC and her crowd)
Related episodes:
QROT-087: Not Only Could $50K not incentivize Steele to confirm dossier, even a MILLION dollars could not
QROT-084: DOJ says FBI omitted known contradictions about Steele Dossier when using it as source to get warrants against Trump team
Tyson and DeMarcus preview the remaining 2025 week 8 12-game slate, and react to the Thursday Night Football result that has already occurred. As usual, with a tinge of Chiefs fan slant (but SOMETIMES ya can't even tell!) (recorded Friday morning)
-Opening
-How we're doing
-Playoff Picture
-TNF Results (
-Dolphins (1-6) at Falcons (3-3)
-Bears (4-2) at Ravens (1-5)
-Bills (4-2) at Panthers (4-3)
-Jets (0-7) at Bengals (3-4)
-49ers (5-2) at Texans (2-4)
-Browns (2-5) at Patriots (5-2)
-Giants (2-5) at Eagles (5-2)
-Buccaneers (5-2) at Saints (1-6)
-Cowboys (3-3-1) at Broncos (5-2)
-Titans (1-6) at Colts (6-1)
-Packers (4-1-1) at Steelers (4-2)
-Commanders (3-4) at Chiefs (4-3)
Tyson and DeMarcus finish up picks, plus a couple of other miscellaneous topics
Tyson and DeMarcus continue game previews:
- Giants (2-4) at Broncos (4-2)
- Colts (5-1) at Chargers (4-2)
- Packers (3-1-1) at Cardinals (2-4)
- Commanders (3-3) at Cowboys (2-3-1)
[CORRECTED - WHEN FIRST POSTED WAS MISSING MOST OF AUDIO]
Tyson and DeMarcus preview and predict:
DeMarcus and Tyson made a "humdinger" of a preview episode, so we've decided to split it up here. This is part one, A bit of hello, then. . .
Specific game previews and predictions start in Part 2
A sign that supports the victims is apparently par for an argument of "breaching the peace" in the UK these days.
I've told you, over and over, that alleged intentions for people to be nicer to each other by keeping their thoughts to themselves will only result in bullies of all kinds using those laws to ensure opinions they don't like don't challenge their opinions.
And guess what, using the power of these ambiguous laws to sic law enforcement on your idea rivals literally is the opposite of getting people to be nicer to each other. It's instead just another version of lawfare.
The proper reaction for an adult in a free society who doesn't like a sign is to look away. They need not worry their pretty little head with the troublesome idea any longer, if they so choose. For the situation to instead allow them to use the force of law to harass someone is the recipe to encourage despots.
Kidney failure.
Bones, tendons, and ligament problems.
Heart issues.
Stomach and intestine damage.
Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory drugs like Ibuprofen are not your daily or weekly friend. Keep your use VERY minimal.
DeMarcus and I have very few critiques! Overall, granted a week late, but a performance that shows a turning of the corner by the 2025 Kansas City Chiefs squad.
A 30-17 victory against a team who will hang 50 on you if you give them the reason and momentum to do it. Night and day difference in their full focus versus how they looked a week ago against the Jaguars.
A great performance to build on, as Rashee Rice can now be a part of the approach.
Congrats all around. Even, and I NEVER thought I'd say this, to Matt Nagy.
(ouch... I felt like I SHOULD say that, but it still feels weird to ever think that is the right thing to do, in any possible universes) ;-)
NOTE: Please be gracious regarding audio quality. Tyson apologizes for not realizing his keyboard sounds were so loud! ( GAH! )
We'll be better next week! Still only like my fourth episode recording with someone else and for this one I'm keeping track of our opinions.
In order of slate, not including TNF and Monday Morning London game.
Good and bad signs, but overall, the Chiefs waste an at-times quite crisp performance, showing no urgency after being up 14 - 0 in first half but then allowing Jags to cut it to 14-7, dinking around like high schoolers for two three-and-outs instead of understanding the known commodity known as "any given Sunday" (or Monday).
As a result of that, plus some tendencies towards mistakes and penalties, and several moments of low-probability desperation instead of belief (or ability? Or practice?) in precise execution, they find themselves on the wrong side of the clock scenario in the fourth quarter.
A solid Jaguars team that the Chiefs should have seen early were very game today give the Chiefs a very disappointing loss, considering what was at hand.
The first official purposefully scheduled episode with DeMarcus. As we are both (native-born) Chiefs fans, we emphasize and spend a lot more time on that, but that game is at the end.
We will tighten up, and already have planned for a tighter structure for the next episode. Due to length, we've added the convenience of time stamps below.
But it is here, so have fun disagreeing with us!
0:00 intro
2:16 Last Thursday react - 49ers over Rams
6:24 Browns at Minnesota (London)
15:19 Texans at Ravens
23:25 Raiders at Colts
34:59 Dolphins at Panthers
41:50 Giants at Saints
51:25 Cowboys at Jets
59:10 Broncos at Eagles
67:22 Titans at Cardinals
73:51 Buccaneers at Seattle
79:15 Lions at Bengals
82:41 Commanders at Chargers
88:17 Patriots at Bills
94:05 Chiefs at Jaguars
You can have a list of people and groups who do not agree with you, or who do not 100% support you.
Sensible.
But what that list is NOT is a list of who hates you. That requires more and would be a much smaller subset.
Never mind that by even making such a claim you've basically proclaimed that what you hate is free speech.
(Recorded before FBI's parallel announcement about the jackass SPLC. AKA Tyson dot connecting again.)
(A follow-up to TSOT-131. Please note I added significant specific information and links to the description that I did not particularly emphasize during the episode.)
EXCELLENT work by Daily Caller News Foundation. They likely had this information, and were deciding when to drop it, considering they dropped it only four days after RFK Jr's "fanciful" press conference*.
Regarding internal Tylenol monitoring and knowledge over a period of time of studies in 2018 and before that showed connections between use during pregnancy, and activities that prove that they were very aware of those studies and concerns by customers and doctors, up to and including specifically monitoring how much the public was becoming aware and mentioning it on social media.
The information comes from discovery documents related to a class action lawsuit against Kenvue / Tylenol.
===============================================
*This is about where deniers stop thinking. So I'll add on CHANCE it turns their brains back on (I'm ever optimistic and idealistic), that as part of actions towards a summary judgment in favor of Tylenol, the judge supported the "noble lie" by throwing out the expert testimony from the case. After all... their testimony, I shit you not, would have "great public health implications” of pregnant women not having the drug)
Ummm...
Well, that's circular, don't you think? If there are great health implications, due to a lot of usage, then would not the harms alleged, have great health implications??
=============================================*
Besides... on one side of the scale is pain being reduced. The other, potential life-long deficits mentally and physically, and possible lifelong dependency on caregivers. ==============================================In 2018, not just ANY employee that happened to see emails, but Janssen's U.S. Director of Epidemiology Rachel Weinstein "The weight of the evidence is starting to feel heavy to me.” Janssen was the pharmaceutical arm of Johnson & Johnson. For one 2018 study, which was a review of existing literature, Weinstein specifically reached out to those involved in the study to compliment them on how sound their study set-up was and how that bolstered the study's conclusion. She has since retired.But J&J first got indications of the problem a decade earlier, via queries and concerns by doctors and customers, which were flagged for internal note and safekeeping. Also in 2018, a Johnson and Johnson internal presentation "High-Level Overview of Epidemiological Studies" pointing out 16 individual studies, 6 systematic reviews, and one meta-analysis expresses the internal opinion of there being among the 16 individual studies a "somewhat consistent of increased occurrence of neurodevelopmental outcomes with prenatal exposure" (AKA, the exact conclusion Trump and RFK Jr announced).
Conveniently (?), in 2022, Johnson & Johnson spun off its consumer products division, to Kenvue. Kenvue became entirely separate from Johnson and Johnson in 2023.
*That dude doesn't do anything fanciful. He has studies memorized.
======================================Prenatal paracetamol exposure and child neurodevelopment: a sibling-controlled cohort study 2013, International Journal of Epidemiology
Maternal use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and risk of autism spectrum disorders in childhood: A Danish national birth cohort study 2016, Autism Research - Official Journal of the International Society for Autism ResearchThe role of oxidative stress, inflammation and acetaminophen exposure from birth to early childhood in the induction of autism 2017, The Journal of International Medical ResearchPrenatal paracetamol exposure and child neurodevelopment: A review 2018, Hormones and BehaviorParacetamol use during pregnancy — a call for precautionary action 2021, Nature Review Endocrinology
Things are looking up in Chiefs kingdom.
And other week 4 results imply further potential reshuffling.
A Sports Scales of Truth (SSOT).
Turns out DeMarcus was up for my idea for breaking out a new episode type about which we both share an interest, so welcome to the show, nephew!
We spin through the NFL week 4 matchups.
This is NOT the final product or final plan, as we decided impromptu to just extend our initial equipment check.
We look forward to an approximate weekly cadence.
With source audio. He thinks the term, which echoes exactly what Trump and others say* about unhinged lefties going over the top with their characterizations of people who disagree, is a "brilliant" term.
He goes on to tell the young influencer skulls full of mush, who LOVED that term, that the "Woke Right" (wait what?) is just as bad as the "Woke Left" as they're both "insane."
Wait... aren't American religious conservatives by definition closer as a class due to that whole upholding of "Judeo-Christian values"?
PFF... No. Only a certain segment are. The rest are "insane." Hmm.. wonder what the dividing line is? Ahem. ( Stay asleep little "Christian" babies, we love and accept you as long as you don't take that whole "Prince of Peace" thing too seriously. If you don't make Old Testament PRIMARY over your New Testament that we don't believe in, you're insane and you're the equivalent of Nazis.)
My Obligatory Attempt for rabids to not misstate and mis-take me: This is not not NOT about saying Yahu and his kind deserve anything EXCEPT the very same case-by-case questioning of motives and actions that we all deserve. No regime or authority is above reproach or above the law. Let alone when they recruit the money, weapons, and manpower of other countries to continually spread death and destruction upon their neighbors.
BTW... It's The Old Testament that says "Love Thy Neighbor". Hmmm...
*You compare Americans speaking their mind to literal historical mass murderers and you wonder why violence occurs?
I've said this before - the side who is actually getting punished VALIDLY will ALWAYS say the side doing the punishing is "burning 'witches' at the stake."
Yet IF someone disingenuously wields the mechanisms of government to lie and deceive to harass political adversaries, it MUST be punished, or you get an "above the law" corrupt political class that turns your country into a banana republic.
(and, more simply, lying under oath is the most basic law violation that can put any of us in prison, so there's ultimate validity to that, that "high offices" do not have immunity from (technically - they do practically, for most of our history).
To that end, a quick reminder of the supreme levels of illegal misconduct that occurred during Comey's FBI. But that's not my conclusion only. So we highlight what I covered in a previous episode:
(QROT-084: DOH says FBI omitted known contradictions about Steele Dossier when using it as a source to get warrants against Trump Team)
So you'll hear them that "there's nothing to it" and "it's political."
You'll hear (the stand-in for?) Hillary whining about being nice (ahem. . . speaking of ultimate ironies).
But they also told you there was nothing to your claim that you could still get "Covid" if "vaccinated"... until they admitted you could (nearly innumerable Scales of Truth episodes).
And they also told you that the vaccine was very very safe, except for that time before it was even released that they admitted, via powerpoint slides in front of experts (Two Scales of Truth episodes: QROT-093 & QROT-094)
So "they" can go take a long walk off a short pier.
As usual, what "they" say is most usually your initial indicator of what the truth is NOT.
Oh it's laughable at this point. An announcement by the administration, or RFK Jr. specifically, then gets lambasted by the media.
This time about problems about taking acetaminophen too much during pregnancy.
And then the most basic research shows its validity, and yet again undresses the Big Pharma teat-sucking "news media."
They didn't find it at "Joe's Conspiracy Corner." Instead, a few little places you may have heard of - Mount Sinai, Harvard, UCLA - were the originators of the information.
You know the "I'm HIM!!" exclamation from sports.
I voted for him. A CRAZY big exception for a truly devoted Libertarian such as me.
But right now, let's be honest, Trump isn't "HIM."
He's not dominating. He not imposing his will to gain his intended and expressed victory.
Latest example... How do you "denounce globalism" on the same day you use the bully pulpit to extend both wars he said he'd end??!!
That is not winning. That is not MAGA (aka the interests of common Americans) winning.
Vote Libertarian.
A horrific start turns into a comfortable week 3 win with at least some positive signs for the Kansas City Chiefs
(Correction: about 27 minutes in I referred to of the two times Patrick and the Chiefs succumbed to relentless pressure and mumbled that it was San Francisco. I meant the Buccaneers)
A follow-up to TSOT125, about a government database being deleted nefariously. In that episode I saw a salvage operation as possible.
And this ties to an announcement by Trump during Kirk's memorial service. If they are able to follow through, it is Earth shaking as to victories of truth over long held lies.
"Like raw calamari. Like some kind of rubber seafood."
Never forget.
I've told you many times about one of the (predictably) disastrous and deadly effects of a plan to hijack the protein-forming function of the body to simulate a material foreign to the body instead of just introducing the foreign material and let the body react naturally.
But sometimes it's good to not just remember that you heard me say it, but instead original testimony from others.
When we say the Fauci, and Bourla, and company are world-class murderers... never forget.
Maybe they never get punished. Who knows. But we must never forget.
Reviewing original audio of an on-the-ground witness testimony, a network reporter.
A LOT missing. Particularly plane parts and bodies.
Sometimes even if you've heard the idea it is a good refresher to review original stories.
Plus an emphasis on "well that settles it!" evidence in other cases, and the importance of appreciating how standalone evidence can overwhelmingly prove what happened or at least what definitely did not happen.
This is purely speculation about motivations that were at least there. It is NOT saying those motivations actually manifested in any participation whatsoever in the tragic acts.
But where thoughts on motivation are valuable is to understand potential persons or circles of interest.
In ALL ways, Turning Point is the EXACT ecosystem susceptible to "this guy has 'lost his way', we must do something!!" temptations, and back room whispered conversations about solutions.
Jax, in Sons of Anarchy, anyone?
JFK, and the objections to his peace stance. Anyone?
Game of Thrones' intrigue-filled battle for the Iron Throne.
Factions.
Arguments of right person to continue the legacy. Et Cetera.
Tommy Boy, due to any number of factors gets access that literally no other human on the planet in the same situation gets.
It's not primarily about whether we should be "paranoid" about it (though there's that), but that the rule does make sense, and of ALL people to be able to circumvent the rule, it probably makes the LEAST sense for it to be someone with a top 0.01% football mind.
Parallel to what tiny fidgets and tells that most of us don't see can mean for a world-class poker player.
Never mind when you add the level of competitiveness inherent in a QB that has delivered SEVEN Lombardi's.
Audio from interviews to back up what I've said about Kirk's change of heart. And related thoughts.
Please note that I expressed his opinion change occurred publicly only in the last few months. I'm now unsure that is correct. It might be that it because more consistent and obvious during that time period, but that he initially to a lesser degree showed the "turning point" in his views many months before that. I'm just uncertain.
A follow-up to TSOT127, with an emphasis on what Charlie Kirk's very close strategic and personal ties to Trump could mean regarding potential motivations and what the "message senders" would really mean.
Now is no time to not learn the lesson of history of the token investigation of JFK. We do not want "closure" for Charlie Kirk. What we want, for Kirk and his family and the country, just as for Epstein, just as for JFK, just as for Diddy, is a full and comprehensive investigation, down to the studs of all the details.
Everything. Every possible angle that is sitting out there of who may have egged on, who may have materially contributed towards actionable behavior. And not only that, once we find out "who" those are, we find out who they REALLY are, and who if anyone they're involved with or working on behalf of.
It COULD be as simple as a 22-year-old skull full of mush dating a trans "woman" deciding that a bullet is somehow less hateful than delivering a bullet. But almost no event of this size has been "on its face" simple in decades upon decades.
And, by the way... thorough investigations of potential leads is not "harassment." Leads require conversations with many people, MOST of which are not initial or final suspects. Good investigations REQUIRE uncomfortable conversations. By themselves, those are neither "harassment," nor are they a violation of anyone's rights.
INVESTIGATE. And if any of it implies something, some entity, some country, some group, is gonna be taken down as a result of the investigation, SO BE IT.
Do NOT fall for political bull pressure that "enough is enough." Good investigations inherently take on the complexity that the the leads bare.
Eagles - Chiefs implications. Prediction. Culture Problems brought on by bad pairing. You CAN analyze without knowing all details.
In the wake of a murder against an influential American culture commentator, we are reminded... FLEX the freedom you have. STRETCH it whenever you can. In the name of areas of the world where speech and truth are being pinched, in Australia, in the United Kingdom, and in other places, BLAST truth. Against corruption, about what is right, about what is just.
When a country gives its soldiers uniform patches that signify their country being FIFTY TIMES its current size by including all or parts of eight neighboring countries including taking in many strategic positions in those countries, you might be being lied to when they chalk a bunch of military aggression to just "self defense."
This is a lens that you should not be able to unsee each and every time you hear some disingenuous excuse of like "we had to level the whole building to teach the family of the terrorist, who is not even in the building, a lesson." And "the last 'stronghold' that we MUST defeat via direct invasion" just HAPPENS to be the largest city (so they can demolish that too)
Use your eyes and minds to judge actions that result in massive death and destruction. Don't just pick a side based on an idea you think you heard and ignore the specific case. To do so, when lives are lost and residences are destroyed, is to lose your empathy and humanity.
This is easy. A nation (ANY nation) should have an educational system that overwhelmingly supports its own citizens, over citizens of another country (and all other countries combined).* Russia should not allow a bunch of American students (nor do they, most likely). * China should not allow very many American students (what are there... ten?) * Nor should America allow many Chinese students.
Let alone 600 THOUSAND. LITERALLY MORE THAN THE POPULATION OF THE STATE OF WYOMING.
You do not support the welfare of your own CITIZENS by allowing large numbers of foreign students to attain education at your schools. You do not cultivate your nation's collective intellect growth.
What you DO cultivate, is access to high rollers and sensitive facilities. Literal intellectual transfer to those loyal to other countries. And in the case of the 600,000, to the literal power that is at philosophical odds with you on the planet.
This doesn't make sense. And has never made sense.
Just as with immigration, we should absolutely allow some foreign students. But it HAS to be under common sense limits.
American citizens, of all backgrounds, deserve the opportunities that our educational institutions provide.
We deserve better than to be educating the world, when our citizens need to be, can be, and should be better educated.
But for damned sure we deserve better than to be giving people who did not grow up to learn and appreciate the philosophy and founding of our country to have a leg up on those that do.
C'mon, K-State and Iowa State. Not every "baby" has to be thrown out with the bathwater. What works for the SEC powers and the Big 10 powers are very bad ideas for your programs.
Think of the most suspenseful "someone is in a server room or private office doing something they're NOT supposed to do" scene you've ever seen in a political intrigue genre movie.
Not multiply it by a million, as to affect on humans and the planet. Specifically innocent infants and children. And you have what seems to be going on now.
No study ever that was a true double-blind for safety or effectiveness on a childhood ob'ccine. Let alone one that compares the full 70- to 90-shot regimen to those who took none.
Miscellaneous Points of Truth.
Starting with an "I Told You So" about the motivations of the EU and the new sacred cow, Ukraine.
[BTW, for some unknown reason I was originally referring to the WEF as the WEC. Pardon me. I blame Friday morning.]
To generally related topics.
And initial thoughts on the minute, and now 2:45, of vid missing from the "raw footage" the FBI released.
Robert Tanenbaum, a very accomplished NYC prosecutor, becomes the Deputy Chief Counsel for the HSCA (House Select Committee on Assassinations). In his first week in D. C. he is called on by a U.S. Senator.
The Senator, Richard Schweiker, is a member of the "Church Committee", which investigated intelligence activities. More specifically Schweiker was a co-chair on a sub-committee investigating "performance or non-performance" of intelligence agencies during the initial investigation of the assassination."
During their meeting, Schweiker tells Tanenbaum two things about the CIA and the Kennedy assassination.
Mainly discussing topics introduced in The Lever's article "FDA Approved — And Ineffective"From 2013 through 2022, 73% of drugs approved by the FDA didn’t meet the agency’s four foundational standards required to show the drugs work as expected. Fifty-five of the approved drugs met only ONE of those four standards.39 met NONE of them.The pillars: * Control group: Patients taking the drug were compared to a control group that was given a placebo or a comparator drug. * Replication: At least two “well-controlled” trials showed the drug was effective. * Blinding: Subjects in the studies and the doctors who cared for them don’t know which patients are on the drug and which are in the control group. * Clinical endpoint: The studies measured the drug’s effect on patients’ survival or function rather than a surrogate measure. They're only the basis of good science from what we all learned in about tenth grade. But to the FDA and those that create drugs.. unimportant. The cancer "treatment" sub-segment was even worse.This isn't taking into account the likely much worse situation for the legally-protected-from-lawsuits vaccine corner of the market.Drug companies committed to doing "confirmatory" studies AFTER market release just have not done them. "Accelerated Pathway" as the foot in the door towards the FDA becoming a "passive observer" instead of a gatekeeper / true regulator / true guardian for consumer safety
"Surrogate outcomes" as a basis for how nearly every drug commercial proves that they in no way take the full calculus into account ("Yeah, but is it good overall?)
Placebos against another drug as something that reduces statistical significance
For those in the know, Demon Fearci at the ground floor of the root of the problem.
"Should regulatory authorities approve drugs based on surrogate endpoints?"
The Deadly Secrets Behind “Breakthrough” Alzheimer’s Drugs
A follow up to TSOT120. Further evidence of the toxicity of GLP-1s.
NINE times higher risk of Pancreatitis than when using Contrave.
3.67 time higher risk of stomach PARALYSIS (gastroparesis) than when using Contrave.
I find other articles discussing these also affecting your KIDNEYS. "Kidney problems can occur without symptoms until the condition is at an advanced stage with limited treatment options."
Ho. Lyshit.
AND higher risk of thyroid cancer.
Wegovy, Ozempic. Just the latest in multiple studies around the same drug that can paralyze the stomach also damaging your eyes.
WARNING: Possibly a record for Tyson when it comes to cursing, so definitely NSFW (outside of headphones).
Basic article reviewed: "GLP-1 Drugs Linked to Higher Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration" (Title changed already since my search engine found it, no doubt to have less immediate headline effect. No longer says "to higher risk." SOBs)
97.5% studied were using a semaglutide (which is active ingredient in Wegovy, Ozempic).
For this study, those who took the toxins... err... "drugs" longer had a progressively greater risk.
One of many studies associating it to eye problems, including others about diabetic retinopathy, and a great "hide what it means" abbreviated "condition" that really means SUDDEN BLINDNESS (NAION)!
By the way, their "speculation" on why new vascularity in the eye is largely nonsense (less sugar could mean less oxygen). Doubt it. The body's ability to oxygenate, and make up for dietary differences to do so, is largely independent of caloric intake (but hey, what do I know).
The simplest answer, even as they stall and say the reasons are not "clearly understood," is that these are GENERAL TOXINS. They can paralyze the stomach, and in fact the MAIN effect that allows them to "treat diabetes" is that they make the stomach NOT WORK NORMALLY.
And then we know there are at least four different eye conditions associated with it.
The definition of a biological toxin is something that significantly disrupts the regular function of an organ or system. This does this across many systems (Stomach, eyes, gastrointestinal, et cetera).
Two brand-new examples of them (the governments and organizations, not the people) throwing only obstacles in the path of anything we the people want.
1. GAVI stance
2. Continued no-fault approach to Zelenksky / Ever-war approach.
A public dressdown of Israel. No matter how small, maybe it's first ever by an American President.
So what could happen?
And if it does, WE must openly declare it as something clearly in the realm of possibility, given the known track record.
. . . if Iran and Israel start knowing "what the f*ck they're doing."
Why Trump's open frustration the morning of 6/24/25 is a good thing and might reenergize his base after the recent interventionist "betrayal."
We are going along fat, dumb, and happy as it seems at least some strides towards real reform are occurring.
Then the night of January 21st occurs.
Is it the end proper, or just close to the end, of bringing American government back to serving its own people?
TRIGGER / BUTTHURTEDNESS WARNING: the episode includes my and others' implied and express criticism of the Israeli REGIME and its acts.
This is not the same as antisemitism. First, because they're logically two different things.
Second, because my criticism is about the regime.
Third, because I repeatedly explain the difference.
The details and sequence of game 1 by the Pacers make a better argument for a reassessment of this series than many of us may think.
I point a finger at one of the most incredible interviews I've ever heard. One of Chauncey Marvin Holt.
And a discussion of another trick that those who trade in intrigue and deception and destruction use to corrupt those lesser participants and ensure they stay quiet.
With the move finally made, presumably no one's darkness retreat would result in a revelation that Aaron is taking the Steelers within even shouting distance of the promised land. But what DO we expect, and why.
Such a Knick move - fire your coach AFTER the old dog learns new tricks and has the best result in a quarter century.
Saquon NOT a hot take artist.
Another quick delving into Epoch Times' interview of Laura Delano, "What the Mental Health Industry Doesn't Tell You." Previously covered another aspect of this interview briefly on QROT-148: The Normalization of Pathology. This time some commentary on a different great insight.
=========================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Jalen Brunson, playing honestly is pure magic and pure poetry.
But when he doesn't, he displays examples of behavior (two types discussed here) that dilutes the logic of the game, and the watchability of the NBA, which is a pure crime considering how much talent and skill just steams off of NBA rosters these days.
The good news is that the fix is SO simple to see and officiate if the NBA just decides to officially no longer accept the con.
Focus on the good and the bad that affect the most people and have the largest implications.
Three examples:
1. Diddy=Epstein. It's not a salacious sex story, it's a blackmail operation.
2. Millions drone swarms
3. Gaza : The conscience-shocking truth of the human tragedy and of the total violation of American ideals.
NOTE: I said Harvard but I meant Stanford.
A Follow-Up to TSOT116. A look at the specifics of approximately ONE-HUNDRED-AND-FIFTEEN-TRILLION in "accounting adjustments" across 21 years.
On its face, sheer looney-tunes fishy, we delve into the specifics, to try to understand what we know, and the largest "benefit of the doubt" we could give it, to scale the likelihood and level of the shenanigans? Purely incompetence? Bad systems?
Some of the factors can point to SOME innocent mistakes being involved, but in no world could they logically make up for everything.
Fitts' website sub-section on topic.
Specific page for focus of episode.
Bloomberg article on the most recent three years.
=========================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A Sports Rant of Truth about the NFL not nixing the Tush Push, and how big of a difference unique and inspired decisions can make.
Philly deserves ALL the credit for developing the particular play, and then perfecting it.
But what does that do regarding how we consider Jalen Hurts? And what is Hurts without it? Plus some parallel analysis to be fair, to point out the importance of environment.
0:00: Introduction / Setup
1:00: Hurts' rank, in one type of measure.
2:21: But . . . "second-tier" above Stroud?
3:10: Who are Jalen Hurts' comps / "0 wins above replacement"?
13:14: An unexpected candidate who could be Jalen if Jalen wasn't there.
16:36: The parallel thought exercise using highly-accomplished traditional QBs of note: Mahomes - Burrow.
22:24: My opinion on the Tush Push.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A very rare "Sports Rant of Truth." I am a sports fan, but usually think these are not the topics to cover here. But why not as its own category.
Two rule changes that could maybe not "save" the NBA, but at least make it less frustrating to watch, as the league with EASILY the worst officiating of any sports league. (I watch the NBA, and I'm glued to the playoffs annually, so this is not just hate, but in hopes for improvement).
SPOILER: Both are based on common sense and merely require the league to longer make players have to be able to DE-MATERIALIZE in order to avoid having a foul called on them.
The ridiculous situation where the ball is being dribbled in one spot, with the defender settled in front of the offensive player, and the offensive player gets to drive right into the defender to draw a foul.
The ridiculous situation where an offensive player already has momentum toward the basket on an open path, but a defender can slide perpendicular into their path at the last moment, when it is physically impossible for the offensive player to avoid him, and yet the defender gets the call in this situation.
Both require the offending players to have the power to dematerialize themselves to avoid the foul. Also known as they require an impossibility, which means the calls are arbitrary and therefore inherently unfair.
And they're specifically contradictory to each other: One says an offensive player WITH momentum is supposed to somehow avoid a last-moment slide into his path, and the other says an offensive player can from a dead stop basically dive directly into the stationary defender.
Both rules, like flopping, and falling upon landing for every three point attempt where someone touches you at all, are not inducing regular basketball play having to do with either trying to score or trying to keep the defender from scoring, but are instead inducing disingenuous activity.
=========================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
I overheard a succinct summary of an unfortunate phenomena in our society. As part of the "American Thought Leaders" series on EpochTV (The Epoch Times). In response to the host asking a question about the phenomenon of ADHD being "self-diagnosed" on social media, the guest, author Laura Delano* says "we've normalized pathologizing ourselves".
My related thoughts and analysis.
What the Mental Health Industry Doesn’t Tell You: Laura Delano
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
[NOTE: I incorrectly stated Austin-Fitts' site. I said Solara, not Solari, See link below)
1. Once your budget goes black, you never go back. Austin-Fitts' claims on Deep Underground Military Bases, and my analysis on how it follows a theme.
2. Some kudos for 47. Wait for it... all this (proper) handwringing since ObamaCare and before, on price gouging for drug costs, and someone FINALLY just says "wait, I have the power of the executive branch... what if I just TOLD them they have to be reasonable versus what they charge the rest of the world, instead of complaining over here like a spectator." An EO he's already issued, and trying to work across the aisle to codify it.
Sources:
The Solari Report's Missing Money page
Base Realignment and Closure
Fed deficit by year (you can adjust years, so you can see the 90s) I was talking about.
Epoch Times article on drug price executive order
Legislation introduced to codify drug price reforms
=========================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
I'm a major critic and this even astounded and surprised me. And if it doesn't astound you, as usual I explain the implications.
The agency, always known for doing astoundingly corrupt and outrageous things, routinely does something that in ANY other context would be nonsensical, unethical, and illegal, that would land someone in prison for a long time. And they do it for reasons just as you'd expect - to enrich themselves.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A quick reaction to this silly premise:
"Why Ufology Must Die"
(Which is proposed by someone who should know better, Luis Elizondo, considering the subject matter is the epitome of having to fight to swim upstream against the tendencies of the censorship regime, and that he's steeped in said subject matter.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
"Epigenetics" is a factor underappreciated by the marketing arms of Big Pharma. The reason... they want an indication they can prove (your genes) to be prima facie evidence that you then take as a CONCLUSION that a certain (no doubt highly expensive) course of treatment is required.
But in reality, when you do analysis past the simplifications that marketing rooms would have you be convinced by, ENVIRONMENT changes everything. And thus you are NOT merely your genes, and you can be, and are, an active participant in your health journey.
This is yet another simple example of how established that fact is, both as an interesting point in itself, and as an emphasis of the underlying broader truth*.
Yet separately, how exposure to environmental toxins can change gene expression to the point of being a genetic legacy that is passed down - a child or grandchild of a person exposed to a toxic environment, WITHOUT personal exposure themselves, can carry the epigenetic expression of the person who was exposed.
A point I first read in a great book called "Undoctored", but here are a couple links for the same point: Environmental exposures influence multigenerational epigenetic transmissionEnvironmental Epigenetics and Its Implication on Disease Risk and Health Outcomes
*Not that JOURNALS devoted to the topic don't already prove its fundamental importance.
=========================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A beautiful example that we all should applaud. It made my eyes well up just knowing the progress we've made since 2020.
The door of tyranny has cracked open a bit. Take advantage always - use the truth as an offensive weapon. Take the fight to the deceivers. Knock the door off its hinges.
=========================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
How do things differ once no letter openers or steam irons are involved?
=========================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Some of us mistakenly think the potential story for the fishiness of Dulles and JFK starts and ends with the Bay of Pigs disaster, the ensuing "break the CIA into a thousand pieces" intention, and subsequent firing of Dulles.
Potentially substantial motives, but not really even one third of the full story.
When criminals hide the best evidence, you are left to an evaluation that is circumstantial. When that is the case, motive is more important, so every straw added on the motive pile, including HOW motivated, is a factor of note.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Comparing a very important moment in history - a sitting President considering how to approach reigning in an agency that has already many times shown its rogue colors just 15 years or so into its existence.
In the form of a White House advisor's briefing and recommendations memo written for President Kennedy circa June 1961, "the Schlesinger Memo," only about two months after the agency misled a President who was only months into his term, and purposely sacrificed pawns in the Bay of Pigs (planned to fail) failed invasion, hoping to create a necessity for the President to bow to their desires on Cuba.
And how, when that President was stopped in Dealey Plaza 11/22/63, the risks the memo clearly identified came to pass over the next decades, as our perceptions were more and more adjusted and skewed by intelligence machinations, and our rights to privacy destroyed due to behind-the-scenes favoritism towards surveillance and deceit above all over principles. Eventually even corresponding to recent revelations about USAID and its statecraft through "NGOs" it funds.
RELATED MATERIALS:
Jim DiEugenio on the declassified Schlesinger Memo, on KennedysandKing website
The Scales of Truth episode on Bill Binney and the effort to preserve constitutionality in broad data gathering
USAID Revelations
More USAID Revelations on funding journalists:
2008 article on cameras "proposed" to be put in cable boxes:
Smart TVs built-in cameras
Project Lifelog and facebook
Facebook and NSA
Google's True Origin Story
The Military Origins of Facebook
A Good American (the documentary on Bill Binney's efforts to limit big data searches to an elegant and selective solution, and how greed won and common sense lost)
Article on A Good American, Binney, ThinThread, and Trailblazer
==========================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
With Oswald as the case study of a pattern and strategy that is no doubt rife with other examples.
IMMERSE your undercover, who is in your potential patsy pool, with fingerprints of intelligence connections and connections to other agencies.
It's not intuitive for the average person but rather than increasing exposure of the true background of the patsy, (ie "One connection is one thing but many starts to approach absolute proof"), since these types of connections are not public anyway, it will make the agencies at risk to being associated to someone who supposedly committed something horrible go into full informational lockdown mode and full deny-and-distract mode.
And the more connections, the MORE agencies that will go into informational lockdown and deceptional propaganda mode, use their Mockingbird puppets at the Post and other places, et cetera. That is, the more intelligence and agency touch points in the file, the comprehensive and complete the agency reflexive response to shut information down.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
What did he think he was doing?
Quick answer: He thought he was loyally continuing his set of related missions that included falsely defecting to Russia and working in New Orleans to weed out possible Cuban sympathizers.
And the thing is, with every activity and association added to his cover lore (let alone those attributed to him even without his presence), he tightened his own noose for what was to come.
Inspired by recent JFK research brush ups and listening to podcasts with the great Jim DiEugenio as guest, one in particuar being Out of the Blank episode 1128, with Jim, Larry Hancock, Gary Hill, Jefferson Morley, and Paul Bleau.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
An example for this phenomenon in the form of how a podcast host treats speculation about Oswald's "patsy" claims.
[Marked explicit for few utterances in about the last five minutes]
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
An analysis of an incredibly important discovery / observation that could make ALL the difference for resources being able to get to where they need to get in the world. For the world ACTUALLY being cleaner, without the need for a scarcity mentality that is convenient for those (financially) elite that push the need for control.
As you listen to the details of the machine allowing batteries to pull a large physical load, imagine for comparison how long your car battery could rotate your starter if it had to try to do it continuously.
A lack of an answer as to what SOURCE of energy we may be tapping into to "produce more energy than we started with" is not "breaking the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics". It is instead proof that we are tapping into a source we are not currently measuring. It should be the reason to SHOUT and the reason for great EXCITEMENT. Not the reason to silence those whose results show it.
Finding more efficiency, as EXPECTED by your OWN known formulas (I-squared-R losses) does not mean anything fundamentally astounding is going on. It is instead just proof that the application of the principles is itself more efficient DUE to properly taking advantage of the law.
If you compare how much electrical power is needed to drive a certain physical load using a standard configuration to drive it, and then compare it to something that is by definition much more efficient, then the fact that less power is needed does not show violation of any law. Instead it simply shows what we knew - the latter is more efficient, so less power is needed.
That is... Power equals current times voltage. Therefore theoretically the same power can be produced by doubling the voltage and halving the current, or by doubling the current and halving the voltage. But if you double the amperage then you have greater losses and less efficiency, so with that setup you need more voltage to get the same power output.
Magnetism is a key and utter wonder of the world, that is by principle and observation untapped: relative motion between an electrical conductor (for example, a copper wire) and a magnetic field induces current through the conductor. This is the key to 99.9999% of all electrical power generation on the planet. It is just a matter of what fuel (wind, gas, water) creates the relative motion. Yet the necessary element - the magnet that creates the field, does not proportionately "empty" based on the amount of electrical current that is produced. It is, practically, an infinite source. It is but a TRIGGER, seemingly. . . a catalyst. . . a conduit that is allowing us to take advantage of some other phenomenon. It is as though the "field" is always there, but it is the magnetic lines of force are what arranges it in a way by which it can be used to induce.
I delved into this topic off of just being reminded of it, after I first learned about it in the early youtube days or before. I may have follow-up episodes
For a fuller rendition note the video documentary that jogged my memory, and from which I pulled some of the information here - "Newman"
If you can watch that documentary and not have tears in your eyes over the implications of the differences in approach this technology can make to the world, then I think you just weren't able to focus on the video enough.
I believe that likely Newman "stumbled upon" principles that another legend who died near penniless knew. Newman, like Tesla, was buffeted and rejected in getting his discovery to mainstream acceptance, as, ironically, "the machine" with all of its mysterious human cogs behind the scenes refused to validate him and his incredible discovery, opting instead for profit over efficiency, sales over truth.
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Inspired first by discussion mentioned in title. Then at freeform after that.
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Kommie-la - Trump Debate One.
General thoughts, including specifically where Trump could have done better.
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
The Biden-Harris admin did even more monumentally illegal things you hadn't heard about? In their first hundred hours?
The only surprise is the specifics.
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
From archival video I've included the audio of a CIA whistleblower summarizing so much of the reign of regime change and fomenting of violence that is the CIAs dark past from the 20th century.
This is as good of a summary as you'll easily find. About 7 minutes.
In his conservative estimate he believes at least 6 million people have died who would not have had the CIA not used American taxpayer money and American taxpayer debt to meddle in their country and their affairs to sow violence and upheaval.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
I could not help myself and had to vent further off of the same subject matter as Quick Rant of Truth 140.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
This is a follow-up to TSOT103, Officer Carries Bag in Direction Where DNC J6 "Pipe Bomb" Was Found 15 Minutes Later
We do a deep dive on the video from the front of the DNC.
0:00 Intro
3:53 List of Oddities generally, outside of just reviewing the video, along with some spoilers on some of the points.
16:28 Physical layout
25:59 Timeline Period 1: About 9:28AM - Bomb Sniffing Dog
29:48 Timeline Period 2: About 11:25AM - Harris Detail / Caravan arrives. Many vehicles and agents within feet of clear view.
37:59 Timeline Period 3: About 12:03PM.
40:08 Timeline Period 4: About 12:07PM
44:52 Timeline Period 5: About 12:51PM - Mans exits Metro Police vehicle carrying bag, heads towards where pipe bomb was found.
48:29 Timeline Period 6: About 13:05PM Segment where they've been notified by plain clothes that they have a "bomb". Incredibly casual activity. No restrictions of MANY civilian pedestrians walking by. Person who finally "confirms" does not in any way have to even MOVE things or look close to see the bomb. Rather, he's in the middle of the concrete patch, looking from 6 to 8 feet away.
59:08 Recap of important points and what we can conclude.
68:33 Review of articles: and several other great articles on Julie Kelly's website Another Suspicious Moment in DNC Pipe Bomb Mystery and several other great articles on Julie Kelly's website www.declassified.live , including the related embedded video. Also good reporting there on what Revolver's Darren Beattie has done. 73:04 Farewell
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Revisiting a point I've made that has more nuance than simply "illegals bad!" As I've said, it's ALSO true that if you do not go through the process then you're not AWARE of the traditions that made the country you now inhabit exceptional.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
To break the ice after not having an episode for about a week and a half. This one includes thoughts on the Telegram founder, Jones' warning to Musk, and a couple of points by RFK Jr. Including a great reframing of Demon Fearci*. Plus what the demon's work would actually entail if he really cared about the safety and health of humans. Versus what he actually does.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A quick rant of laughter here courtesy of our looney tunes Vice President, Comma.
(I like that my voice recognition changes her name to a comma on the screen, so for today I'm going with it)
Anyway the Presidential candidate (!!! Holy SHIT!) with some "brilliant" (cough cough) possibly drunk commentary on democracy.
I mean I'm not sure you have heard something this "deep" since either the last time you were three sheets to the wind or the last time you were as high as you've ever been.
Ho.Ly. Shit.
Just a tease and initial briefing, not a deep dive yet, on a further development of the story of the pipe bomb that was placed in front of the DNC on January 6th.
The development:
1. Video of officers, agents, or dogs being near enough to it they should have seen it well before it was found. First at around 9:30, then in the early and later parts of the noon hour.
Recall that it was supposedly placed the night before, though that "video evidence" only shows a man not the man placing anything.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
I found this out later in the episode so I'll lead with it here - This ex Google CEO "expects" (ahem) MILLIONS of AI Autonomous drones being available in the Ukrainian theater of war. "White Stork."
This is Skynet stuff. Except possibly worse - either in Matrix or in Terminator, wasn't there a master brain you can shut down? These are autonomous and make decisions up to including explosive engagement without connectivity.
We discuss his disingenuous speech to Stanford students. How he understates his past regarding his interest in warfare and presents a fake neophyte aspect to them. And also undersells exactly what he is doing.
After trying to present a noble idea of stopping aggression. He immediately pivots and it says that these drones will be used as a tool of massive offensive aggression. They will not wait on an invasion.
Once again Big Tech and all major veterans of it are your enemy.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Wait - are you saying that it doesn't seem likely that Russia would sabotage its own pipelines if that's how they would get income from other countries at the time that they could use the income due to an existential war? No s***, Sherlock.
The obvious truth comes out.
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
There is every indication that of all possible administrations that would take what is currently happening in the United Kingdom and make it happen here, it is the administration that might get placed after November.
It is what they've confessed and what they've done. There is near zero reason that our institutions would stop them and their zero reason that they would stop themselves.
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Here's a lesson. When a lame, deeply unpopular, senile President "steps down" from his candidacy, but his announcement is only in the form of a statement in 2024, it is not on Presidential letterhead, it does not have the Presidential seal, and his signature looks different. . . that is only generally allowed with little question and no real mainstream effort to investigate in ONE direction in 2024. When it's the Democrats.
When he doesn't show up the next day either except only on the phone, in 2024, that is allowed in only one direction. When it's the Democrats.
When later he does show up finally at the White House to give his statement 3 to 4 days later supposedly, and then a clear impostor walks out of the White House for a Rose Garden video appearance (see TSOT100 & TSOT101) to back up the idea that he was actually there, that happens without question or mainstream investigation in only one direction in 2024. When it's the Democrats.
When later a Pulitzer prize-winning journalist (Seymour Hirsch) says that a former President (Obama) forced him down at the threat of the 25th amendment (him being unfit), and that he had permission for that takedown from the person who works replace him (Harris), that only is allowed without mainstream discussion or investigation in ONE direction. When it's the Democrats.
When weeks later the President finally all but states out loud that he was forced out, and so all of the suspicious time lines and facts before are exactly in line with the reasonable suspicions, that is only allowed without major discussion or further mainstream investigation in ONE direction. When it's the Democrats.
Had any of this occurred in the opposite direction EVERY SINGLE MOMENT OF EVERY SINGLE DAY you would see breathless investigative journalism on who pulled the strings behind the deadbeat candidate that was going to have a horrific election result.
EVERY SINGLE MOMENT OF EVERY SINGLE DAY you would be reminded that the Republicans had time to replace him and decided not to and so they must reap what they sow.
If it was the Republicans you would get breathless reminders EVERY DAY about the proper process for the replacement candidate.
You would get breathless reminders EVERY DAY that is it it is at least shady and likely downright illegal for a different candidate to get to use the funds of the candidate that was replaced. President Trump has lobbied the elections commission to say exactly that. How should Kamala have immediate access to Biden's 90 to 100 million? People didn't give to Kamala at the top of the ticket. They gave to Biden at the top of the ticket.
But the big story here is this. it is in one direction because Republicans have for decades now been totally spineless.
They've seen a two-tiered justice system come to pass.
They've seen lawfare.
They've backed down when citizens have called the bluff on clear corruption and not backed up those citizens. To the point of allowing protesters to be thrown in jail for walking slowly through open doors.
And when some of them do show a spine the rest of them abandon those individuals who are applying common sense and opposing corruption. And more often than not they distance themselves from those trying to truly stand up for America and her citizens, and even deride them openly more than they support them.
The Republicans reap what they sow every day.
And our citizens suffer as a result.
America dies as a result.
The last great chance for fairness and TRUE equitable distribution of wealth and opportunity on the planet WILTS as a result.
You allow a two-tiered political system and a two-tiered justice system with powerful people just doing whatever they want whenever they want, up to an including SHATTERING all precedents of proper action by the government and by Presidents, and you only get more of it.
By the way, white hats, my ass.
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Companion (technical detail) episode to TSOT100. Please note that TSOT100 explains the ratios that are the conclusive measure of analysis. This episode just gives you the numbers from which the important ratios are derived, along with the (rounded) ratios themselves.
Please duplicate the effort, and prove to yourself, or prove to others if you have a substack or wordpress, or whatever.
I discussed important pivots in detail in TSOT100, but for a quick example, when ALL of suspicious Biden instances is well taller than ANY of non-suspicious Biden (and they are) then that's conclusive. Of course it matters as to how much taller that is but that's why I did the math in the last episode.
Order:
1. Shoulder width measure 1; 2. Shoulder width measure 2; 3. Height (top of shoe to top of head); 4. Head height; 5. Bottom of nose to top of head
In parentheticals are the four ratios, rounded to the nearest 1/1000.
TALL JOE
Screen grab 1: 386, 417, 1697, 214, 145 (4.396, 4.070, 7.930, 11.703)
Screen grab 2: 167, 183, 728, 96, 61 (4.359, 3.978, 7.583, 11.934)
Screen grab 3: 173, 187, 737, 97, 63 (4.260, 3.941, 7.598, 11.698)
Screen grab 4: 176, 188, 740, 95, 59 (4.205, 3.936, 7.789, 12.542)
Screen grab 5: 173, 182, 727, 94, 59 (4.202, 3.995, 7.734, 12.322*)
NORMAL JOE
Photo 2*:* 185, 201, 747, 107, 75 (4.038, 3.716, 6.981, 9.960)
Photo 5*:* 178, 187, 712, 109, 77 (4.000, 3.807, 6.532, 9.247)
Photo 3*:* 84, 90, 335, 50, 35 (3.988, 3.722, 6.700, 9.571)
Photo 4*:* 360, 385, 1430, 207, 151 (3.972, 3.714, 6.908, 9.470)
Photo 1*:* 170, 183, 658, 94, 63 (3.871, 3.596, 7.000, 10.444*)*
Photo 6*:* 180, 195, 693, 106, 75 (3.850, 3.554, 6.538, 9.240)
Photo 8*:* 300, 321, 1130, 173, 125 (3.767, 3.520, 6.532, 9.040)
Photo 7*:* 132, 142, 497, 74, 54 (3.765, 3.500, 6.716, 9.204)**
** For easier number comparison, these pics are sequenced largest-to-smallest for the first ratio (first number in italics). The original pic number corresponds with how I numbered them in the description of TSOT100.
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
[Substackers - please duplicate this - visuals will work better, as will textual explanation]
[LISTENERS - MANY details and explanation in Episode Notes]
Why should you care? First, because calling the big psy ops bluffs of psycho liars is its own reward. And the more you admit these lies to yourself, the closer you are to just saying things plainly also to others who desperately need to hear it.
How much longer are we going to be okay with a government and a setup that allows government, via whatever rationale, to LIE about whether the person standing before us is actually the person we elected???!!!!!
It's not "CUTE."
It's not "cool."
If you do not have the time or the ability for the President to appear at a given moment, that's its own rationale for him or her not to appear!
Everything else is world-class criminality when and if your premise is that you are a law-abiding, freedom-loving country. If we cannot trust you, for ANY reason, to either don't have the President appear, or to have him appear when he or she is available, then we cannot trust you.
These lies can NOT stand. Because lies build on lies. It may be "cute" or "cool" when an agent is dressed up as someone he or she is not. But when these tactics are used to impersonate PRESIDENTS it can ONLY honestly be termed CRIMINAL.
===================================================
0:00 Background (what major candidate, let alone a sitting President, does not tell his campaign or his staff Cough-BULLSHIT-Cough. And then doesn't show up on video for at least two days? HE DID NOT AGREE AT FIRST. PERIOD (and that's giving benefit of the doubt as to whether he ever has))
- - - - 4:23 Where you can find video (https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/did-joe-biden-taller-covid-152216840.html)
- - - - 5:39 Audio from video
6:39 An explanation of the log and process
- - - - 7:16 How do we compare without a measuring stick?
- - - - 8:04 A specific ratio, based on your measurements, does not change (i.e. How many of your "heads" tall are you... how many of your shoulder widths tall are you). Neither measurement changes, and so the ratio will not change.
- - - - - - - Calculated four different ratio types
- - - - Five screenshots of Tall, 7/24/24 Biden
- - - - Eight photos pulled from internet (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ) for normal Joe Biden.
- - - - - - - - Once each ratio was calculated, threw out lowest and highest for each, leaving six apiece.
- - - - 11:58 Ratios used, in detail (Height is numerator in each calculation. 1. Height versus width of suit seam. 2. Height versus regular shoulder width, past seam 3. Height versus head length 4. Head versus partial head length (bottom of nose to top of head)) (SPOILER: Last one does not work well). Measure in pixels
17:32 Consistency of five photos of suspicious Joe:
Neither measurement is easy to accurately measure like we could with a tape measure. - - - - - But the point for this episode is whether there is a SPREAD between the one suspicious Joe set versus all the others.
- - - But for information, the ratio spreads (highest ratio versus lowest ratio) for the four measurements are 104.6%, 103.4%, 104.6%, and (wonky ratio) 107.2%, respectively.
- - - - - Why is 104.6, 103.4, and 104.6, and 107.2 important? Because though we know this IS the same person (since its from the same video), this sets a standard for our accuracy / precision. Because it is the same person, these should vary less than the eight photos of "normal Joe" from various settings (cut down to six for each ratio).
- - - - - Answer; They do vary less - for those taken from a variety of sources, the ranges are higher in all cases (106.19%, 105.74%, 106.88%, 108.22% respectively)
20:18 Comparing the average height ratio of "tall Joe" versus the average height ratio of "normal Joe".
Dramatic result. As a percentage of normal Joe, tall Joe calculates out at nearly 10% taller
(109.64%, 109.54%, 114.83% (speculation - because tall Joe is NOT Joe Biden, part of this third ratio being so dramatic is probably just because tall Joe has a smaller head, so the ratio is even more dramatic), . . . and 127.43% (clearly this last one is no good - nice try, but clearly not helpful)
- - - - 23:46 How do these ratios translate to suspicious joe's height? Assuming Joe's regular height is 6 feet, then, respectively, 6'6.75", 6'6.5", 6'10 (and ignore the fourth one - its wonky)
27:08 Comparing the average of suspicious Joe to the HIGHEST non-suspicious. This gives extra benefit of doubt to "regular Joe's" height - we didn't take the average for regular Joe, we are instead using only the highest value for each ratio.
With that we STILL get 107.11%
(Average of tall Joe is 7.11% taller than the HIGHEST (tallest) regular Joe).2nd and 3rd ratios: 107.03%, 110.6%
Note that this span - between the TALLEST regular Joe and the SHORTEST tall Joe, is a LARGER RANGE than that which contained ALL SIX of the regular Joe heights.31:06 Comparing instead the "shortest" value for tall Joe Biden to the "tallest" value for regular Joe Biden.
Even with this incredible caution - as though all but the shortest value for tall Joe Biden was "too tall" and all but the tallest value for regular Joe Biden was "too short". . .
STILL the %: 105.06%, 105.75%, 108.62%, 117.45% (throw away that one).
That is, the "shortest" tall Biden indicates as over 5% taller than the tallest regular Joe Biden. (On 72" base height, that indicates at least 3.6" taller)
These gaps are all inline, in absolute range, of how big the span was for all six normal heights.
- - - - 38:03 Implied height from last measure: 6'3.45"; 6'3.922", 6'5'.885".
Remember, by definition if this is the same person, then the five instances from 7/24/25 Rose Garden appearance should blend in with all the rest. Even if somehow these five were sitting near the very top of the results of the full 13 photos, they should at least more or less indicate the same ratio.
Instead, that they're not only the tallest, but EASILY the tallest, and are as far or further removed from the other results as the other results are all separated from each other, is conclusive. Again, the question is NOT "is this guy not too much taller". The point is that Joe hasn't grown (that part Yahoo got right), so if we have evidence of someone 4 to 7 inches taller. . . IT. CANNOT. BE. JOE.
So the question is, do we have that evidence? We do.
And we do not just during any old moment in a four-year term, but a moment where the absence of the actual President implies the possibilities of a literal COUP.
Fuck the Deception Complex, and fuck the politicians taking it hostage and / or taking advantage of it. If the guy needs to go out due to an inability to lead don't use the excuse of not wanting to admit it to LIE to us on how you got there!!
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
(None of this should matter but since in 2024 color gets to sit in for the value and worth of argument then we should discuss the authenticity of the argument for color)
The argument here is simple. She is descended from slave owners. Says her quite white looking, born in the 40s, Jamaican citizen father, Donald J Harris.
Therefore her Jamaican side is not a straight black side as gets portrayed in the cartoon version* of the 2024 election.
*That the illegitimate "main" media portray
And, given that prominent families don't normally just give away their prominence it is just as likely that that family would tend to continue to marry into the white elite side of Jamaica society throughout most of the lineage down to Kamala.
Then isn't there a very good chance that Kamala's Jamaican side has just as much white lineage in it as it does black? It's a very good chance.
And there's a decent chance it has significantly more white lineage in it.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
There could not be a more 2024, post law and order, peak of lawfare, story than this.
[CORRECTIONS (I told you I was recovering) :-D- At about 12:10 I said a bunch of pictures with Michelle. I meant a bunch of signs that said Michelle on them.- At one point I said 1/2, 1/2, and 1/2! I meant 1/2, 1/4, and 1/4.]
Nobody any LESS disenfranchised than a person powerful enough to be among the 536 most officially empowered people in the entirety of our United States. And who on top of that had a decent presidential candidacy.
And we're to believe the Air Marshal Service has objectively called her a potential threat as a domestic terrorist??
Or is this an Occam's razor situation, where simpler is more likely.
Remember Occam's razor says simpler, but that means taking into account the full calculus of actual reality. It doesn't mean simplifying reality.
So if you are now in the world where corruption is rampant, that becomes your background for determining what the simplest explanation might be.
We discuss the initial superficial connections to a political motivation plus a little bit more embedded connection to a political motivation.
That is and (you're not going to believe this but it has to do with HRC).
Everything old is new again.
Little Rock to DC 2024
Little Rock never left. Neither did Obama.
12:24 An aside, on Kamala's authenticity deficit
14:55 An aside, on Donald J Harris. Look at the picture, and do the math.
Not that it should matter in our warped world, but since you insist on bringing it into the argument look at him do the math and realize really Kamala may only be 25% black. Also known as just as white as she is black. You can't make this s*** up
17:42 Would this administration do such an outlandish thing? Answer: Would it particularly stand out if they did?
18:24 The other political motivation - HRC history with Gabbard
20:29 An aside on being "civil" during a campaign, and Killary succeeding with no fallout whatever (as usual) in doing the opposite. Even to her own party.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Ismail Haniyeh assassination. A contextual treatment.
We'd better prey. Elites are exercising global-level brinksmanship.
===================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
The criminals build their circumstantial cover. Because there's nothing that otherwise rational human beings won't do so long as grant money is the carrot at the end of the stick.
It is so obvious. If you had the grant money and the sacred cow titles to initially cover what became a criminal act of at the very least the most criminally negligent activity in the history of the world, then you might as well throw money at the same bad science establishment that you first used, but this time in order to cover your ass and continue the general lie.
When you're never going to actually win the argument about your entire accomplishments versus your historical rival, except by just tagging on more unique things you did, then you do things like this.
Negotiate your way ( most likely) into being the flag bearer for the entire country.
When typically it is someone whose main focus is Olympic sports and who does not have worldwide sports fame already.
Also fairly common Is that the bearer is someone that we are learning the story about because he or she is the flag bearer. Most of us didn't know it until that moment.
Very atyypically would be a person that is already a superstar in the sports world. Maybe for countries with small contingents but not for the US. Going back to 1992 no American men's basketball player has been the flag bearer.
LeBron James is an attention whore who believes that if he stacks up enough firsts most people will finally think he's better than Jordan.
He's not. Jordan was 100% in the finals. And MJ didn't play longer and longer and longer because he was settled with what he was. He couldn't chase a future LeBron he didn't know about.
Never mind that he didn't think of, because of course he didn't, that for athletes in less lucrative sports, being the flag bearer can mean the difference between a few lucrative deals comparatively for them that helps them get past their financial struggle.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
First they tested the waters for an event that is the epitome of fair use.
Somebody has to host the presidential debate but the real newsworthiness is what the candidates say.
Now the second in the pattern. Trying to stop criticism of nothing less global than the Olympic opening ceremonies.
We'll see where it goes but this is clearly their next attempt to shut you up and to ignore the rights we are supposed to have to have open discussions about societal topics.
=====================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Secret Service Director Cheatle getting too cute with her answers still reveals by implication what really happened.
AND with her answer we realize there may be work to still do if they actually are committed to their mission to (ALL of) our political VIPs.
0:00 Introduction
1:18 Hearing Audio: U S. Representative Lauren Boebert asking about requests for improved security.
2:00 Analysis
9:34 Closing
=====================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A caveat on my previous accurate characteristic of Kamala.
She is inept.
She is a disaster waiting to happen in direct proportion to the amount and importance of her duties and responsibilities.
HOWEVER... in an environment where she is able to control the dialogue, she can seem effective. Particularly for instance when she has a verbal attack canned and rehearsed for a debate.
Now as soon as you do an interview, the sheen comes off. Especially if you're asking her about mistakes. Disaster.
Asking her to be improvisational? Disaster. She has yet to CARE to learn about subjects she should be fluent on. There is no "off the cuff".
But in a narrow controlled situation she can appear effective.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
(Extremely NSFW.)
As full-blooded sarcastic as I've been since my episode about spike proteins being nice and friendly as long as they're in the vaccine, even though they're very very MEAN if they're in the virus itself.
No proof at all to automatically drop your otherwise well-founded suspicions.
0:00 Intro / TLDL
0:39 Background on suspicions of authentic "stepdown" from campaign: Not telling campaign, statement discrepancies, not done on video for biggest political moment since Nixon left.
2:29 Walk from SUV to Air Force as long awaited video proof of life? The hell, you say.
3:11 Can you tell me why?
4:29 We discuss. Not yet enough of a reason to drop your cynicism. Your skepticism. Plain and simple. We might get better proof. It may pile up. But we are not there yet.
5:12 Minimally horrific plausible theory. Still a nightmare for America but at least not the truly worst case. Joe and Jill insist they will not actively participate in an exercise that legitimizes a decision they never actually agreed to. So they need their cooling off time.
6:43 On the other hand... also still not ruled out...
Skin on the back of your neck doesn't crease like it did in Ireland. Period. Experiment on your friends and neighbors (oh, and check out TSOT086 for further plausibility on the argument - A Prez with CIA background is tricked at least 31 years ago).
8:35 Is the brisk bounding up the stairs the "tell"?
10:43 On the "white hats" and Q. I'd love to believe it, but... bruh
12:13 A suggestion for "white hats" to just get this over with. :-D
14:53 Back to the initial topic. Some analogies.
=====================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
The same investigative philosophy that brought us damning evidence of the 2020 election in "2000 Mules" is now brought to bear on the attempted assassination.
A great initial step.
What devices were where and were associated with the attempted assassination and where is the fishiest places that some of those devices went.
An incredible job by Heritage Foundation.
And also a very good observation that they do not want to yet work directly with the investigation because they consider it too tied into whatever might be behind this.
An example: one of the devices associated with the would be assassin went all the way to Washington near an FBI office.
Another visited Butler from bethel on July 4th and July 8th and then had no activity after July 12th.
Is this yet damning? NO. NO. NO.
There could be perfectly good reasons and he might have known associates that would account for that. But it is incredible information to feed a true investigation.
=====================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
We're going to tell you minimally what Joe's lack of appearance on video means.
An audio proof of life only? Have you heard of Rich Little or Frank Caliendo or AI voice functions?
In a time of great concern for the country and for the office of the Presidency he doesn't appear on video???
It doesn't definitely mean the worst, though we will discuss that because you should at least consider it.
That's how we get to the bottom of things when we have leaders who lie through their teeth. We at least consider that they're, wait for it, lying through their teeth.
Maybe Jill and Joe are just hyper pissed that leaders have made them say they're stepping down. Or hyper pissed that they were told in no uncertain terms that even if he did not announce his depart re from the race, that they would make it appear that that was the case anyway.
Maybe therefore Jill and Joe want no part of helping put out the impression that they wanted to. Maybe they show up in a few days or a week.
But the problem is if they wait that long then that delay itself is also suspicious.
Worse, God forbid rumors late Monday night are true that Biden is going to a hospital, trying to put a bow on their fatal deception.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Oh automatic Democratic voters, I envy not your lot.
Taken for granted, taken advantage of, presumed to be ready to just take on the next marching orders with no question.
So are you going to let yourself fall for the gas lighting as you think "why did they replace a mentally gone candidate with a candidate who is proven to be slow on her feet and seemingly incapable of complex intellectual exercise??"
As your leaders then tell you to watch the swinging shiny pendulum and tell you "She is actually a VERY qualified nominee. Why, one of the most qualified nominees in many years."
As you say "I thought the idea was to get somebody who would do very well against Trump so why did we pick her?" are you going to let yourself get gas lit that you're insane to think that?
Truly it's an interesting little situation. Vote for your own destruction and the destruction of your country, Democrats. I expect nothing less of you.
=====================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
We've covered the Steele dossier before. But I'm guilty of not really putting it into its proper political context. Plus there was a detail I'd missed that further takes the cake.
In essence the FISA court warrant was activity to spy on an opposing campaign and candidate during the election season.
That's the definition of the crime that was Watergate.
But it is times a thousand.
They didn't just break into an office building. Instead by deceiving judges as to what they really knew, and instead holding up the Steele dossier as unvarnished and unchallenged truth, when they knew differently, they were authorized to use the surveillance capacities of the federal government itself to spy upon their largest political opponent.
But wait... The FISA court actually denied them!
SO THEY JUDGE SHOPPED AND TOOK THE SAME CLAIMS BACK TO ANOTHER FISA JUDGE WITHOUT TELLING THEM OF THE INITIAL REJECTION!
The ridiculous FISA courts traditions are nothing like usual legal traditions and you don't have to! It's secret. Which means the Obama-primed FBI would actually have to take the initiative to just be honest. Just because they should have a pang of conscience about it. So of course that did not happen.
=====================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Coming back with vigor to rallies that include thousands of people, fraught with inherent security risks, right after the psychological terror that is being nearly assassinated, by definition for political reasons.
Making it through COVID over 4 years after it was novel, and making a "rally".
The same in terms of the "strength" it shows?
Well at least according to two prominent MSNBC commentators.
That this argument less than a week after the assassination attempt even escapes the mouth of even one political commentator, no matter how obviously stupid and leashed and collared to one political view, literally defines the irrational levels of opposition and rabid hate (granted, here below the surface, but clearly implied by the argument and its timing) that are parts of the reason that Trump instinctually understood that he has to fight.
A follow up to QROT-22.
There I explained that there was audio where Rochelle Walensky functionally walks back a ridiculous claim she and others made in July 2021.
The initial claim?:
"97% of [covid?] hospitalizations are of the unvaccinated."
"It's a pandemic of the unvaccinated."
In July of 2021? At least 16 months after the alleged novel virus first started spreading? Go f yourself, Rochelle.
A few weeks later she gives detail that, if you were stupid enough to believe it to begin with, reveals the claim to have no basis in reality.
This time as a reminder and better proof I include the audio of her admission.
That reveal: The data that 90% of the ("covid"?) hospitalizations "right now" involved unvaccinated people, actually started from JANUARY 2021, when most people didn't have access to the vaccine anyway.
And that the data wasn't from all 50 states. Or even most states.
The data come came from " several states."
So why would we believe that they weren't selective in which states they chose to come up with their clearly deceitful and disingenuous claim?
Please remember to check out a lot of those episodes from back then. There was really good work in 2020 through 2022ish around the ridiculous lies and bluffs about the alleged problem and it's alleged solution.
=====================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
I know that some people no doubt have. But my point here is that we must not be bullied away from this being part of the very visible national communication.
As we know one side does their best to avoid conversations that we are supposed to have.
But if we are to pierce this illusion of their narrative control we must push on.
We can't just be happy that someone did not succeed in fatally shooting a political figure. We must not JUST feel the winds in our sails that someone who was so close to death did not die and is now more inspire
WE must be inspired.
WE must ask the big questions.
WE must analyze things ourself as opposed to wait for the answers.
And then we must also INSIST on official through answers and insist on official accountability and insist on openness.
=====================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A conversation spurred by what a 15-year-old kid from near Jackson Mississippi said off the cuff, barely thinking about it at all.
I suppose I'm not supposed to say it. Since none of us supposedly have working enough brains to understand empathy across population groups just because our pigment might be different.
But that doesn't usually stop me.
Of course I add the apologistic caveat upon caveat of context about many people I absolutely admire exceedingly, and try to put myself in their shoes.
But I nonetheless get to the point.
How is it than a 15-year-old can imagine that if not for something that distracts him slightly he would be "committing violence or shooting or killing"???
HOW does that EASILY flow from a kid's mouth of any ethnicity???
Let alone that it could be that if you heard it you can make a pretty accurate guess on ethnicity?
Yet that IS where we are almost 16 years after the Obama inauguration.
Imagine how many individual lives would be different and better by many degrees if this mindset was changed significantly.
=====================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
When you lack the respect for those you're speaking to such that you do not think it is beyond the pale to give them ludicrous answers when important topics are at hand, then you are not a person of substance.
You are not a person of depth.
You are not a person who is able to lead an agency or team with an important mission.
As soon as you say one statement as ludicrous as this one, apparently just to see if it sticks, in a situation where your team is called to the mat for bad results, then you have proven yourself unworthy.
She should be bagging groceries at most.
Corollary: In these situations those of us who are honest and earnest do not have to prove other people's clear falsities. Stop giving non-substantive and non-earnest people with the audacity to spin yarns in front of our face the 100% benefit of doubt, wow assigning yourself 100% burden of proof.
====================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
(Oops, thought I had posted this yesterday morning.)
There is no need to overanalyze the nuances of what the Secret Service did or did not do. The answer is more plain than that.
THEY HAD MICROPHONES.
ALL they had to do was communicate and move him or cover him within seconds of getting the communication of a threat.
The conclusion pivot of "deliberate or horrible mistake" is NOT...
... about whether or not there was one shooter,
... or why didn't they cover him better in case there was two,
... or why didn't they eliminate the threat when people were indicating (they sure as hell did within 10 seconds of him firing!!),
... or why they didn't have rooftops covered the usual half mile out.
Those questions are there but the CONCLUSIVE evidence is just much simpler.
There is no nuance.
ÀLL they had to do was use their microphones to communicate to the other team members so the President could be covered or moved.
And They.
Did.
Not.
OR the communication was blocked.
OR those on stage, multiple agents, did not respond to do their most basic protective duty. (I'm not going to Vegas on those odds).
It doesn't mean any particular one of them is to blame.
But it does mean...
at least one person very deliberately KEPT the President from being covered when there was the easiest solution - merely give and react to the basic message of "Cover him - we have a threat."They had earpieces.
====================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
(Please check back later - I might index this episode better later)
1. They're told they have to be cautious about "how they characterize" the event???!! An event that in its simplest high-level headline description is no more complex than "Dog Bites Man"?
They DO characterize it in many ways instead of the simplest and most direct?
What are they THINKING?
Recent trending searches, not 16 hours in, do not include the story??? Google IS your enemy. Stop fucking supporting them.
Oddities: Presumed breaches of a process the Secret Service should instinctually have down.
a. Not that many buildings.. why are they not ALL covered??
b. Responsive protective fire FROM podium area? (I'm unsure... just going off someone else's claims of research). Would not be hard to confirm.
c. I hear ya... things are rough and your heart rate is up... but goodness gracious, create an actual shell around who you're protecting!! If you're GOING to let him stand up (and why was that?), ya damned well better have a detail that is as tall or taller than him! It was a head shot - things are not totally certain yet - don't expose his head again!! (Thanks to my co-host on Kimology 411, Kim Schultz, for helping me realize just how big of a point this is.)
OTHER:
-We cannot just share experiences anymore. The insanes have robbed that from us! Even in the most stark moments in our history, we can no longer just unite in shock. They're doing that on PURPOSE.
-Related - questioning what a man does within 30 seconds (to several minutes) as a response to being shot at a rally? Oh. Okay. So you'd know what's the proper range of reaction there? He almost lost his life.
-Pardon him if maybe he thinks he's in a fight. Ummmm. After he's almost shot dead, maybe pardon him if as some instinctual way to rally his supporters he comes up with some off the cuff pretty reasonable small gesture and word.
-True derangement: How does one compare the last four years to the previous four, and conclude the repetition of the LATTER is the threat and/or the "threat to democracy"?
-DANGEROUS times... right NOW. PRAY. MEDITATE. BE ACTIVE WITH YOUR OPINION!
God BLESS AMERICA. Even though we probably don't deserve it. ==================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A fair use recording of important eyewitness statements. A group that was near one of the really very few buildings near the really in Pennsylvania and saw the guy climbing up to the roof and saw that the guy had a rifle. Was pointing out to police and he was certain that secret service could see him pointing. But they let the rally continue. Maybe just very poor judgment. But it's just important to catch this type of eyewitness stuff.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Children's hospital bombing? Maybe.
But think of the the timing and at least consider otherwise.
You don't have to conclude on it.
But you can at least use that timing and the circumstances and the players involved to not fall for rash decisions that will result in many hundreds of billions of debt dollars enriching others, and probably tends to hundreds of thousands of lives lost.
Two weeks after Trump makes a very believable claim - that he would end the Ukraine war very soon with proper negotiation.
Around a week after Putin says he believes Trump would and could. And why wouldn't he believe that? Trump has a nice record with negotiation and there were no wars of relative note during his 4 years.
Within days of the non-president Biden saying forcefully ( for him ) that Ukraine will beat Putin.
With the incumbent presidential campaign in tatters, with Trump's very believable declaration to end the war, with the reveal of whether Trump will attain office only months away.
Would Putin bomb a children's hospital NOW?
Maybe. MAYBE.
But also maybe the horrific powers that be decided that they had limited time to push the situation.
A limited time to push the conflict that conveniently for them weakens the only nation-state that generally opposes the informal nation-state that is the World Economic Forum.
Because of Trump's believable claims, their timetable has moved up.
And so now they do what they've done before. Make a bluff that is so big that you are supposed to not dare challenge it.
Honestly you don't have to openly challenge it!!
We just have to behind the scenes CONSIDER the suspicious timing and not go lock stock and two smoking barrels into yet a higher level of sacred cow supporting of the WEF actor Zelensky.
Zelensky, who if he cared at all about his people, or could act upon caring for them, who knows which, would have gone to the negotiating table a long time ago.
They're trying to get you to believe that American further indebtedness, through the proxy war funding, is a necessity. Forget your future and the value of your wealth and savings. You are to sacrifice for a "utterly necessary war" instead of just holding off.
Again, you can believe Russia did it if you want. But at least suspect that possibly they didn't, given the passions of war and how that can fuel propaganda.
Suspect that it's possible rather than potentially igniting all of Europe.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
George Clooney with not just a media post but an op-ed in the New York times? Oh yeah I'm sure that was only of his own doing. If you believe that I've got a bridge to sell you.
Reminder of Truth. Covering something I had before, but drawing further conclusions. Not the mere idea academically using a PCR process for a test (which has its own problems), but add in that the very PROCESS and sequence used to get PCR "tests" manufactured is in essence a big con.
The previous coverage was in TSOT032: "FDA Allowed Such Variance in PCR Tests that Practically They Were Not Even Close to the Same Tests"
So we're revisiting for further analysis the same article covered there - "SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data" Now on an FDA archival site.
My episode includes some quotes, but I'm not placing them here. Rather the below logic string stands a bit separate, even though much of it is covered in some fashion in the epidose.
Initially, Feb 2020, FDA says hey, there's no specimen we can easily make available to you ... so do what you can with some kind of related materials (including synthetic materials).
That is, every test manufacturer gets to make up what it is that their test is even going to try to detect / going to multiply in order for it to potentially pass the threshold and be counted as a "positive".
Three months later, in May 2020, they come up with a reference panel (so, think of this - the positives before then.. the basic FUEL of the "information" that fed the covid-19-as-major-infectious-disease, were based on best guesses, of many varied kinds.
Quick aside: If they waited until they were near a real, "accurate", and standard test, in MAY, before they reported "cases", how would our world be different? Literally, we'd have been three months into it, the facts of not really that many people having awful effects would have stood out more instead of "what the tests say".
NOPE. In fact, for the rest of the WHOLE time (through end of 2021) that PCR tests were used, the initial and widely varying "best guesses" on what a "covid-19" test should detect and multiply, stood.
iFDA first says in May 2020 "hey... you've got better patient specimens now, so that's a good validation of your tests. Use a patient specimen and see how your test responds"
Ummm.. how in holy HELL could that be a good "validation" - are you not selecting many of those "actual covid cases" based on what the "best guess" PCR tests already in existence said were "positive"??? CIRCULAR.
Around the same time, they introduce the "reference panel". But they only ask the manufacturers to report back whether their tests could return a positive against it, and just how much material it took before it did.
So what about false positives???
Even as they said "report your findings" they caution - hey, other clinical validation is recommended - after all this is only one strain.
So when level of detection thresholds varied OVER 3,000-FOLD across some 180 tests whose manufacturers reported! Is that revelation a problem??!!!
Here's the deal... It was NEVER based on a real standard. So if there were 59 standards, and then there were over 200 standards, then what was it catching, if levels of detection varied by over 3,000 fold?? If there were 59 widely varying standards, there was never "a" standard. There was never "a" test.
Does it not make sense that at least some of these manufacturers, without a reference Covid-19 standard, just pulled some commonalities they COULD rely on? And if they did... what were the commonalities they KNEW of?
Well.. the commonalities that already EXISTED. That is, the commonalities of CoronavirusES.
The non-novel ones.
The ones already a part of the general coronavirus family of flu viruses.
That is, it is quite possible, that due to 59 to 200 standards, that between all of them, they drew WILDLY from the general NON-novel characteristic universe, that basically ensured "positives" from all over the place.
Honestly, without more clarification, there is no reason to think at least some decent percentage of these "come up with SOMETHING" tests relied on common features of the coronavirus families.
And THAT, is a great mission for citizen investigators - these companies did have to describe in SOME fashion what it is they were trying to do under their EUAs for their tests. This article lists most or all of the manufacturers.
But wait.. what if this IS the jig???!!!
Think about it. If something is designated an "emergency," then to float how much it is an emergency. . .
(if you're a lying criminal CDC or Big Pharma type (but I'm being redundant), then you want "results.")
But you don't have a specimen yet.
But in order to have "results" you need "tests."
What if EVERY time (or nearly so), they "fudge factor" tests, and then just happily accept that they have "many, many positives!!"
Because if they waited for the tests to be developed on ACTUAL specimens, that have been verified and validated as isolated true virus specimens, it's weeks to months later.
Then weeks to months later to tell the manufacturers to use it.
Then weeks to months later for them to test.
Then weeks to months later for them to distribute the tests.
And then more time for significant tests to be used and the results reported.
By that time... herd immunity.
And in the meantime, no "test results" would have happened yet.
Do we need to know maybe extensive details of why PCR testing is garbage?
Maybe... but we kind of already do - it's the cycle threshold problem. You can always continue to multiply some remnant that is present. But that doesn't mean the initial quantity was enough for someone to be contagious.
Hell, we know that we went by "positives' not by symptoms.
If anything tells you someone didn't have enough to be contagious, it is that they literally have mild or ZERO symptoms.
Related - is there a question of WHAT it is they're actually multiplying?
Yes, but we kind of know that answer too - they are NOT multiplying the whole virus.
They are DEFINITELY only multiplying some small portion or some small remnant.
So what is that remnant that they define as identifying the whole thing REALLY indicative of?
IS it unique only to the thing allegedly being tested for? That's the rub.
Thanks to Penny Butler of PennyButler.com (an incredible example of citizenship truth-finding) for the inspiration to look back into this.
=================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!#PCR #FalseTesting #BadScienceChasingBad #cyclethreshold #Covid
A reminder/flag to watch a great documentary. A fundamentally important documentary. "The Dimming".
Dane Wiggington is one of the heroes.
Plus a little bit of a preview and emphasis on the fundamental importance in case you didn't know that it was valid or maybe hadn't fully thought through just how fundamentally damaging it is.
=========================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A part of my attempts to get a podcast version of some of my previous video work.
This episode archives work I did back in 2020 around a KDHE Secretary I refer to as Lying Lee Norman. In presenting a chart he specifically manipulated to give an impression of not only masking making a dramatic difference almost immediately (that's a clue) but also that rural counties not following the same (false) mandate were worse off.
In reality the opposite is the truth.
When politics gets mixed with science it is no longer science.
This piece of work carried the water for a little tyrant governor.
This is really analysis and emphasis of the great work done by the Sentinel which can be found at sentinelksmo.org. =========================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
(Here and there I will be translating my old videos into podcast form. This is one from August of 2020.)
BLASTED. Easy and Solid Math as of 8/6/20 Shows Stuvid-20 Mortality Rate is Estimated in Range of Flu and Not in Range of Early Scare-Tactic Numbers.
Audio of video, along with stops so I can explain context.
0:00 Intro
1:09 Initial audio from video
1:44 Total deaths from Coronavirus, from Worldometer website. 712,236.
But we are not given what would be the denominator for the mortality rate formula. We have confirmed cases, but not an estimate of total infected. (Mortality rate would be DEATHS / INFECTED)
2:32 To start to piece together getting to a sensible denominator, we can use data from flu. A health.com article doesn't give us infected, but does give us total deaths worldwide from flu: 290,000 to 650,000.
(Because we know of techniques resulting in overcounting for Covid, we select the high estimate (650K) here for use of comparison.)
Intermediate comparative observation (but still separate from final math): 650K annually for flu seasons that are about six months... versus 712,236 after over five months of the "much deadlier" Covid. So where are the "ten-time-as-deadly" results, when Covid is also allegedly much more infectious (yes, some lockdown, but if ten times as infectious, should this not make up for it?).
4:15 Flu mortality reference: 0.1% (1 out of each 1,000 infected), from the health.com article. Straight quote from Demon "Fear-ci" Fauci.
5:24 More of why it makes sense for denominator in formula (number infected) to be high - articles on how many people are asymptomatic (so with NO symptoms, that segment is not likely to be a confirmed case). A Digital Journal article, referencing an Italian study of over 5,000 people, saying 73.9% of infected have ZERO symptoms.
7:11 So still working CDC.gov seasonal flu dashboard. This is for comparison of how many infected in the US just by flu (to get a sense of seeming proper range of infected worldwide by flu, and by approximation, Covid).
39M to 56M.
U.S. is just short of 1/20 of the world population. So, while this is too high (not every part of the world is in flu environments), the approximation for total world flu infections would be 20 times the U.S. infected, so 780M, to 1.12B.
This is a nice "check-our-numbers-against" estimate, but now what we're going with.
8:45 So clearly the worldometer shell-game highlighted number of worldwide confirmed cases (19M) is no approximation of total world cases (since even flu numbers each year is that much and more).
Even using 56M total cases worldwide (when that's how many people get flu just in US) would get us to mortality Fauci estimates (1% of all infected die)
(Written aside: SUCH a fucking liar (if 74 % don't even have symptoms, then how could 1 out of a hundred have such bad symptoms that they die???!! Demon))
9:42 Get to proper denominator. Using flu as our comp
- - - Mortality rate of 0.1% (1 out of every one thousand who get flu die, so therefore if you have the number of deaths, you have the number of infections). We do know the deaths.
650,000 flu deaths times 1,000 equals 650,000,000 infected worldwide (and this is within our range figured earlier (when we went 20x the US amount).
12:24 Running the numbers for mortality with our new infected estimate. 712,236 deaths DIVIDED BY 650 million. Result: 0.109574769 PERCENT. More or less 0.110%. Versus 0.100% for flu. Within ten percent. Not ten TIMES.
13:09 Conclusion
=========================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
What about people being openly associated and/or enthusiastic about Klaus Schwab is not obvious that they're therefore not allegiant to their country's founding principles?
Clearly the two are at odds.
So when we are aware of or have an inkling of such close associations that end up fast tracking somebody with major literal foreign influence we've got to start calling it for what it is.
Klaus-First loyalists (/ immortality cult members) should hold no official sway in OUR country.
Never mind that the half-year gathering six months apart from Davos is always in communist China.
If it walks like a WEF quack and it talks like a WEF quack then they shouldn't be allowed in our offices where they're allegedly representing our Constitutional rights. They have clearly shown that they believe other things supersede our Constitutional rights and clearly shown that they have an agenda that is separate from an American agenda.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
The US Women's National Team hero laughs at the idea that she should address the fact that little girls growing up now can lose the chances she had when they have to play against males.
Put into the context of just how big the biological differences are, by including details on how the women's national team performed when they wanted a tune-up versus a Dallas FC under 15 team. And that versus their results for the whole year against other women's national teams.
This is not to disparage women's sports. They're a beautiful thing that help teach the same great lessons that sports participation teaches for boys and young men. But the reality is that even the best women soccer players on the PLANET know perfectly well that a way to "punch up" is to simply play against exceptional regional boys teams.
But when politics gets in the way, reality is ignored. In fact questions that beg the obvious conclusion are not just ignored but laughed at dismissively.
So much for being a hero to little girls who want to play soccer.
=================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
It seemed very suspicious to me that "Republican" Nikki Haley would show up within days of the Biden debate disaster with thinly veiled direct advice to the opposing party on how they need to go forward with a replacement candidate.
Why would you just not watch the car wreck and happily understand that the Republican party may have the White House for 4 years? Why would you not just keep this advice within the Republican party leadership should the concerns she had come to pass?
But instead of telling her Republican party colleagues in some internal strategy session that perhaps the Democrats might go with a youth candidate, she blares it to the whole world not just that it might be their strategy but that that is what they should do.
It really looks more like advice and that she's indicating "the right thing to do for the country," as opposed to the alleged "warning" she was giving to "her" party.
Her answer - a much younger candidate.
This echoed for me a bit of WEF strategies. Compromise and coopt young promising leaders and put them on the fast track. So it made me curious of Haley's WEF connections. Was she carrying the narrative water for Schwab and company?
After all, if even the "opposing side " says that that's the obvious move then isn't it " less suspicious " once it happens?
So with one Brave search it was revealed that I was correct about WEF connections
This also makes more sense of why, despite never having good support whatsoever among polls, that Haley was the last one to drop out against Trump.
I may follow up on this one with more details.
=========================================
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
All they had to do was follow the normal rules that enjoining potentially illegal action until there's time for the actual adjudication is an important part of our jurisprudence.
But instead they found a way to not comment on the constitutionality but allow the behavior in the meantime.
Even in the face of admitted facts that say that the Bought-den administration conspired with social media companies in order to censor opposing views, and that censorship in line with that coordination DID ACTUALLY OCCUR, they deny the idea that there was enough connection to even enjoin in the meantime.
That's not their job. Their job on an appeal is to give major deference to the factual interpretation of the lower court that said an injunction was proper, pending the actual case coming to pass.
Listen to why it made no sense. And also not just me telling you that but the dissenting opinion.
How and why the Supreme Court would not back up the most important free speech case in decades if not centuries is a mystery. And certainly suspicious.
00:00 Overview / Intro
2:26 Aside on odd doctrine that acts as though plaintiffs are the only ones affected even when it is clear that even hundreds of thousands to millions of citizens were subject to the alleged violation.
3:11 Explanation begins in earnest.
5:49 District Court conclusion: Likely to succeed in merits. Massive censorship attempt.
6:32 Majority's excuse to look the other way. Somehow censored Americans don't have "standing".
7:42 - - - Majority opinion quote
11:50 - - - Clear misapplication of a judicial doctrine - Merely allowing a reasonable injunction based on a specific allegation of unconstitutional action is NOT "general legal oversight of another branch."
Not in any land where the emperor actually does wear clothes.
Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs.
13:26 Alito dissent (for he and two other actual sane Justices)
- - - The stifled speech fell clearly within the categories of speech considered most important to protect.
16:08 - - - A point I've told you a million times. Government does not get to censor merely by having somebody else do it on their behalf.
- - - Justice notes that this ruling will define an attractive model for those who would suppress speech.
- - - "Dangerous". "Blatantly Unconstitutional".
- - - Concluded that traceability between attempt and actual censorship was proven.
18:57 - - - Previous censorship does not mean you can't prove causation now.
- - - - "Court refuses to address a serious threat to the First Amendment"*
19:29 Plaintiff Dr. Jay Bhattacharya reaction (Note, I was not sure during the episode, but Dr Bhattacharya is indeed an American)
20:10 - - - -AN ASIDE FOR THE REPUBLICANS - this does NOT stop the argument of impeachability. In fact, the admitted record actually STRENGTHENS it. If the Republicans could pull their heads out of their collective asses for more than .25 seconds at a time.
- - - Versus Pentagon Papers. . .
21:44 - - - - An Asice - Heartbreaking circumstance, even embarrassing, as a system that legal immigrants no doubt CHERISH as a beautiful example has instead been left undefended by our highest Court.
24:32 DeSantis Reaction. Just use a sophisticated plan with subtlety, and you're good to censor whoever you want.
25:00 Summary and Wrap-up
It's not a "threat"! It HAPPENED! It has DAMAGED the First Amendment, in that the precedent has been set, and is now not challenged, that it can be broken by the highest single office in the land!!! That's not a "threat"... It is a current attack!!!!
=========================================*Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A follow-up to TSOT087. An alleged key part of the support network of the current non-president is caught speaking out... "O-botha" ... sides of his mouth after Bought-den's disastrous and highly predictable debate performance.
Can you say elderly abuse*?
To be clear, no net sympathy goes to this non-president. Due to his repeatedly treasonous ways, he has earned the hanging tree, through due process of course, over and over.
=========================================*Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
[Explicit language]
Well... looks like we have our answer to the question / warning posed in TSOT086.
0:00 No magic pills or other assistance for Bumbling Basement Biden. Clearly.
0:37 MSNBC Reaction
2:00 Analysis Point One: Maddow's "huh", plus who the commentator loose-lipped out first (Oh, what the hell, I'm with friends... I can name drop Obama). Point: His fingers are in everything,
3:20 - - - - Recall Valerie Jarret's role, to understand why Obama was really on the phone.
5:00 Analysis Point Two: Ridiculous "surprise" reported by commentator. His feebleness is not news. But recall, according to them, reality is not real officially until they say it is. THEY give you permission to think things. According to them.
7:04 What does this seemed canned reaction mean, as to their plan to this point and the future? A way to just place a candidate that even Democratic voters didn't select?
13:23 Reaction to some great points made by Steve Sailer in his great interview with Tucker Carlson
18:11 Summary
Our fearless non-President will "debate" tonight.
So let's reset how badly he regularly gaffes / becomes unintelligible / flickers near off.
If none of this happens tonight... IF.. .He's a dynamic, vibrant speaker who doesn't mumble mode and doesn't absolutely trail off into nonsense at least several times...
I don't know what to tell you as to how.. there are several possibilities, including the one presented at the top of the cast... but IT... AIN'T... HIM.
00:19 The "Q" of the CIA speaking of mask-making from no later than 1992, when she was able to trick and spook a, well... spook. Former CIA director then President George H W Bush, no neophyte in such things, with a whole head disguise apparatus - neck, face, hair.
1:50 Why relevant right now? My initial proposition (I spoiled it with my open here in the description).
4:58 A Precedent from The Memory Hole: That weird mechanism / apparatus / artificial organism on the same intellectually deficient candidate four years ago. Who remembers the mechanical shiny earthworms sticking out of his sleeve? It happened.
6:40 How he actually operates, gaffe example 1.
9:03 How he actually operates, gaffe example 2.
10:02 How he actually operates, gaffe example 3.
12:29 How he actually operates, gaffe example 4.
14:15 How he actually operates, gaffe example 5.
Now go judge the "debate" with your eyes fully open.=========================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Here I introduce a new item to my fundamental list of things that keep a society from being prosperous, through the general lens of them affecting America, but it applies everywhere to the extent they're present.
These items are things that as soon as they're introduced can ONLY result in less freedom and less truly well-distributed prosperity (income, quality of life, mental outlook). It is not that "maybe you survive them". You survive them in that you're not dead yet. But neither were (most of) the Soviets at their height. Neither are (most of) the Chinese in that authoritarian regime. But prosperity spread across classes does not survive. Over a period of time these things cause general prosperity ONLY to decrease.
DISCLAIMER: LISTEN TO WHAT I ACTUALLY SAY, as opposed to getting your panties (red state men - I'm talking to YOU) in a bunch (and I identify with you generally about a thousand times more than blue state anything). Criticism of regimes and of undue influence does not de facto equal "the 'a' word". You're being played. Surprise... people are supposed to be able to criticize fellow humans. Of course we're assuming here that no one is "chosen".
It is FINE to have an opinion on important world affairs. And your support can and SHOULD be passionate. But as SOON as it leans towards regimes pressuring Americans to abandon basic American fundamentals of freedom, and officeholders to ignore and particularly be enforcers AGAINST those rights, then it is... a fundamental problem.
And not just "pressuring" in some small sense, but pressuring, due to the influence, in a way that makes important Americans who SHOULD know better absolutely instead kowtow like they've been hypnotized. THAT is what we have here.
After I cover the first two (THIS regim...errr "administration" domestically, the clearest and most obvious violator of the Constitution in our history (and its not close), and the foreign influence that somehow you're not supposed to see as foreign influence, even though they have a police state mindset that they INSIST on us having on their behalf), I go over about another three of these FUNDAMENTAL obstructions to a society getting freer and more prosperous over time.
0:00 Intro / Preview
1:41 Addition to list: This administration
3:17 - - - - Manufactured "support" phenomenon, not coincidentally by "soul-sold" Epsteined celebrities.
4:19 - - - - Versus what the rest of us know
5:30 - - - - An aside on Biden and the debate (and, yes, I was wrong on when it is to occur)
7:08 - - - - ASIDE highlight summary of 2K Mules
8:38 Addition to list: The truest of foreign influence, and why their influence is particularly damaging
21:33 Prong Previously Discussed as a Primary Destroyer: Money as Debt / Banksterism / Money from nothing that upon conjuring is "property" of bank class to be "lent" out as though they went through the toil and trouble of earning it and keeping it safe and now are "risking" something to let us "borrow" it.
30:25 - - - - As a food supply for the inflation monstrosity.
30:54 - - - - Inherent ability to get to scam your own wealth means you have the margin and incentive to propagandize on its legitimacy or necessity or utility.
33:34 - - - - ASIDE on overlap, but not perfect alignment, with this prong and the one discussed before it.
36:47 Prong Previously Discussed as a Primary Destroyer: Secrecy Complex - Effect Number One, on politics and corruption.
37:34 - - - - Truman on unintended operationalism of CIA, versus what he actually intended it to be.
41:13 - - - - Steele Dossier purposeful misleading to FISA for Carter Page as indication of this type of out-of-control operation: Total mislead of what they knew regarding validity, even to the point of a straight deception of a court. Who got control of this operational for them to be this activist / politicized??? Versus Watergate.
47:15 - - - - Criminalization of merely knowing what is going on / surveillance state.
[NOTE: at 48:22, I meant "after 2020", not "after 2000"]
As a source of co-opting companies for their surveillance / censoring / propagandizing ends.
55:01 Prong Previously Discussed as a Primary Destroyer: Secrecy Complex - Effect Number Two, on degraded and delayed technologies
58:33 - - - - ASIDE on a 90's source that said there was zero doubt that we WILL (with certainty) be out of fossil fuels, at the rate we were using them at that time, by 2025. So I guess we have six months left.
1:01:36 - - - - An ASIDE on the "over-unity" argument: Close-minded "scientists" - it is is "more than input" in an open system, it is begging you to investigate what other energy source we're tapping into. But whether you do or you don't, the fact of the "over-unity" is the point of the energy mechanism, not whether, after you have a chance to check for fraud, you can explain it! Don't be so prideful.
[Marked explicit - I BELIEVE I've "bleeped" everything, but I'm not certain]=========================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Not a deep dive, but covering how the overlap of two fundamental and understandable principles, electrical induction (behind basic electricity generation), and resonance (the frequency at which an object naturally vibrates) turns into a "pregnant elephant in the room" question of "why wouldn't we use these principles to create energy much, much more efficiently??!!"
The plan is to cover this in full in a later episode, but wanted to encapsulate the basics early. The more people start thinking of this the better.
Not covered during episode, but here are a couple of relevant articles:
"Nikola Tesla's Earthquake Machine", from Forbes.
"What is Electromagnetic Induction"
=========================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Isn't it funny how they really say it up front - By all superficial accounts and impressions ReCaptcha is just a test of being a human - you found all the pictures that included parts of a bike for instance - so you've proved yourself and off you go.
But what is demonic spyware-as-a-business-model Google ACTUALLY doing?
First, what they always do - lie to your face.
Second, more specifically, capturing (CAPTCHA-ing and RE-CAPTCHA-ing) all kinds of data about you.
That is, something as easily clean as "they passed the test - move on" is really monitoring the hell out of you, sending data back to US processors, when there are perfectly more simple and elegant process for even their stated "advanced monitoring" rationale (a rationale that would not even seem necessary)
Google's secondary excuse to distract tech heads: "Oh, well if they were to be able to visit the site and then fill out a form and complete the 'order' in an inhumanly quick time then they must not be a human".
Okaaaay.. but your Turing test was supposed to screen that ANYWAY! That was the predecessor! Making any further lame, less elegant, reverse Turing test inapplicable!
But sure... let's say it would be logical to apply yet another "are you human" after you've applied a legitimate one already (it's NOT logical, but let's say) . . .
A beginning coder could program using timestamps and record locally how long it takes from beginning of interaction with website to finishing an order. Or could record how long it takes to fill out a form.
In no way, shape, or form, would that require it to be sent BACK TO THE U.S. FOR "PROCESSING".
Our main source for this analysis and discussion is an article on how a website could stay compliant with European Union privacy regs and still use ReCaptcha. Spoiler: It's not out-of-the-box compliant.
Yes... .wait for it.. F'ing google, with more money than many small countries, in no way should be expected to just make their self-contained product compliant with privacy regs for nearly an entire continent.
It's left to individual website owners to take on the risk of informed consent for web visitors.
We also mention the parallels of creeping lower levels of expectation of privacy and its parallel to U.S. Fourth Amendment (I darned well know that, but initially called it fifth amendment) search and seizure law (i.e. warrants, probable cause, and the like).
In the end, the article says exactly what I'm telling you. As regard "proportionality" of how much data you should be collecting, versus your need to collect, in terms of the concerns of privacy invasion , the United Kingdom's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) says this is the relevant measure:
“Is the processing proportionate to that purpose, or could it be seen as using a sledgehammer to crack a nut?”
In answer, the article cited states simply:
"Google ReCaptcha V3 takes a sledgehammer approach."
The article "GDPR & Recaptcha: How to stay compliant with GDPR" on measuredcollective.com goes on with more analysis and information than covered in this podcast, including alternatives to F-ing Google, that are relatively proportionate (i.e. HCaptcha, FriendlyCaptcha).
One, wait for it, doesn't even have to use cookies.
But waaait - how could King-of-the-World Google need all this complexity but another solution needs not but a tiny fraction of what Google needs, to do "the same job"???
BECAUSE GOOGLE'S BUSINESS MODEL (that probably makes them vast NSA and/or CIA or DIA money on the "side") IS SPYWARE!!!!!!.
Welcome to the founding of the Banana States of America.But don't take my word for it being an egregious miscarriage of justice and utter violation of anything close to Constitutional principles. Take the word of a world famous for 50 years constitutional law expert. We discuss that, and we discuss how it can still be true that somehow the ruling will stand and that no one will get punished for it.
(WARNING: Have marked this as explicit but to be clear I'm definitely cursing like a sailor much more than usual in this one. So particularly NSFW.)
While taking no responsibility for his role in bashing the information that would have been helpful to fellow victims and in propping up the censorship regime that attained unprecedented levels, News Nation's disgraced CNN shill Chris Cuomo admits to being vaccine injured. But he still is a half-shill apologist as he does it.
Plus a bunch of related et cetera.
Passing on some important red pill statistical information from a New Zealand source. This source was an employee of the ministry of health. He looked at batch data including a total vaccinated and total deaths and was able to conclude statistically what a lot of us knew already. Particularly listeners of The Scales of Truth.
Of course for bothering to pay attention to reality this hero is being jailed by a country that supposedly has something resembling Western ideals. Australia and New Zealand have truly lost their way in the last several decades. Their leaders long ago took up the mantle of collectivist tyranny and this is just the latest. Love our people down there but it is lost. At least these heroes are speaking up anyway. In any batch of people there are stubborn heroes driven to tell the truth no matter what. In this case Barry Young is one.
A follow up to TSOT080. She is who we thought she was upon hearing her Orwellian self contradictory sentences. Turns out being an utterly reliable champion for corruption causes you puts you on the world's most obvious fast track.Pierre (Castro) Trudeau,. . . Sanna Marin . . . Zelensky. . . this inflated wench.
They are who we thought they were. They're plants. They're trojan horses. They're Manchurian candidates. And they hate you and your freedoms. And it is obvious, if you JUST LOOK at their associations.
=========================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
For those who aren't into close inspection, I suppose you could call it a "veiled admission." But your esteemed hero is better than that. This is an admission of a "very active approach" to control information at Wikipedia. Analysis and original audio included.
Now, recall, Wikipedia (who I GIVE to) already deals with the practical effects of interference by bad actors (many of which are PAID) who can take down content from those simply trying to give TRUE uncensored information that is highly relevant.
But this is beyond that. The foundation itself, not the anonymous hordes of censoring "private" editors, is admitting to approaching the two major 2020 events actively.
And as with any civilization dying due to authoritarianism, prevalent citizens speak contradictory phrases consecutively, as this fool says this approach to actively monitor information for "accuracy" was necessary because covid by definition was "novel" and we knew nothing about it.
Yes... so isn't any and all information then even more relevant? Since we're in discovery?
NOPE. Not when you're doing the censorship bidding of others.
An interview excerpt of a Katherine Maher (ya don't say), as she discusses her realm as CEO at the Wikimedia Foundation, in front of the friendly faces at the Atlantic Council.
It is impossible to overstate how much the Authoritarian Inmates are Running the Asylum. And they do so with a comfort that comes along with conspiring with such a large group of conspirators in high places, that they openly admit they're complicit with the government and technocrats in violating the First Amendment (yes, yes they are, not just in spirit but technically).
[Explicit tag for a curse word or two]=================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Let's be real about the true threat. We keep minimizing horrific acts by the other side and chalking it up as though it's just kind of classic 1994 "politics". It's not. It's beyond the pale, it is threatening every foundation we had been built upon.
A follow-up to QROT-114.=================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
,An example of why I just can't bleed anything but Libertarian. Among many (I hate to say) reasons why no matter how much I TRY to hope to believe in one side to truly and consistently stand for the causes of a free society, when it comes down to it, they here and their commit such HUGE violations of those principles so as to merely be of a different FLAVOR of violator than the side I do EVER support.
In this case... what flipping part is hard about the concept that we cannot have a society that exchanges ideas freely if some situations / subjects / groups are not allowed to be criticized??
Imagine a world where a President cannot be criticized. No matter what, no matter how nuanced your critique, no matter how much you made your critique about the actions, not the person, you were not ALLOWED to do it?
Atrocious. UnAmerican.
So.. why in holy HELL do you imagine that it would be okay to ban criticism of ACTIONS, the consequences of said actions, of not just an individual President, but a group or a foreign power??? Groups can't be responsible for actions and results worthy of criticism????? Obviously they can. There are factions merely at school board meetings, for God's sakes. There are actions made by school boards that are QUITE worthy of criticism. Let alone other actions made by other groups.
But here we are not applying this basic logic in some cases.
This is so wrong-headed as to be otherwise entirely against what a certain political side (cough cough RePUBlicans cough) would SAY they're about! They say they're about VIGOROUS discussion. They COMPLAIN and hang their hat on the idea that they ALLOW ideas and the OTHER SIDE does not ("So-and-so was not allowed to SPEAK at an event he had booked on campus, thanks to those nuts! How outrageous! Be tolerant of speech!!!!")
Unless, because they're acting like simpletons, a subject THEY are supposed to hold to without fail is challenged. And in that case, no less than the epitome of who should be the BASTION of censorship immune.. a UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT... MUST be removed.
For... ironically (except for that whole "their brain goes dead when they want it to" part) merely standing up for the idea of free speech on campus.
Let me emphasize...as our traitorous primary and secondary public school system thinks it is too important for your CHILD to have a political opinion to worry about just generically teaching them facts and figures... and smart parents are rightly upset... instead, in THIS case young ADULTS, of the age where it DOES make sense to start to understand and participate in political society, do so, and their institution's leader gets disgraced / removed merely due to the fact that that leader said, in essence, that young adults are of the age where it DOES make sense to understand and participate in political society!!!
To disallow speech, and while so doing, character assassinate (literally disobey one of the Ten Commandments, ironically) to deceive as though the speech was not motivated by an action instead of the mere identify of a group, is the highest sin of a society intending to be free.
“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum....”― Noam Chomsky, The Common Good=================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Hey guys... be careful and take advice of some 90-year-old test representative that "if Trump gets into office"... AHEM... it would threaten Democracy.
You can't make this *%&# up.
But, worse, less than ten TDS-controlled people saying 6 million should be effectively disenfranchised, had to go... to... the... Supreme... COURT?????????
What the HELL are we doing. How are these people allowed to participate in "society". Shouldn't their only participation being having a Folgers can or hat nearby so that the functioning of us can drop a quarter in here and there as they sit on the sidewalk?
I have a legal education. Not that you didn't know, but we long ago crossed the line into pure "lawfare," I term I did not coin, but that I wholly endorse. THIS is that. And that no one goes to jail or is scolded out of the courtroom over such, is all you need to know about how far we've fallen.
[CORRECTION: Slip of tongue at 13:40. Said drugs are "all" inhibitors. I should have said "overwhelmingly" or "often"]
A brief review of previous concepts regarding "solutions" are often just starting another problem. And dot connector using case study
This "medicine" is just to clear up skin problems. But similar to 99.99% of Big Pharma "solutions" it merely rely on INHIBITING your body's proper functioning*, ignoring entirely the likely HUGELY damaging effect of such inhibiting so long as they can market that as little as ONE thing that is a "symptom" of something ELSE, is reduced.
But there is no speculation on whether inhibiting proper functioning MAY be hugely damaging - Rinvoq absolutely DOES cause massive damage. But... THEY. DO. NOT. CARE.
Literally "side effects" include:
Difficulty of breathing, hives, a NEW skin lesion, moles changing, WHITE BLOOD CELLS GROWING OUT OF CONTROL... WEAKNESS ON ONE SIDE OF YOUR BODY.. PROBLEMS WITH YOUR SPEECH OR VISION... CHANGES IN YOUR MENTAL STATE.. BLOOD IN YOUR URINE... HEART ATTACKS... STROKES... SERIOUS BLOOD CLOTS. a NEW skin lesion, moles changing, heart attacks.
We speculate on the not improbable possibility on whether some of these are due to nanoparticle (not nanorobot, relax) used as drug carriers (see TSOT025, TSOT026, QROT-080 . . . others).
This is a potential because as nanoparticles are admittedly a good "potential" drug carrier (that's right - even as environmental science warns of their potential damage if released from the computer manufacturing industry into the general environment, FREAK Big Pharma sees them as a great "potential" prospect to put DIRECTLY in your body, and, if a repeated "medicine" like "anti-depressants", then quite repeatedly).
The dot connection, as covered in those other podcasts, are that therefore the parallel if used as a "drug carrier" is to that of MRNA "vaccine" injuries.
There is the likelihood that nanoparticles (like graphene) were used as "adjuvants" in so-called vaccines (aka MRNA trojan horses, a new drug class, trying to classify for lawsuit protection). Literally spectroscopy by independent research indicated repeatedly its presence. If so, then NOTICE HOW MUCH OF THESE SIDE EFFECTS COINCIDE WITH THE CLOT SHOT.
That is, some are due to the immediate credited function of INHIBITING your body's proper function, but others due to the problems of nano-particles being used**.
In this case, a "JAK" inhibitor (Janus kinase).
It's simple, folks. Nanoparticles are related to auto-immunity: Particularly when they're micro-blade shaped, but regardless, in that they are soooo small compared to the same elements as they naturally occur (surprise, most metals are NEVER going to appear as micro particles. They're appearing no smaller than dust sized), that they instead BIND with human tissue. The body then sees a conglomeration, part of it being actually human. But in seeing the "invader" it mistakenly sees the binded human tissue part as foreign. Regular sized metals would never bind with human tissue. As to the injuries related directly to nano-particles (or at least depending on the shape), it is that these nanoparticles are meant to be durable, to "deliver" the drug, up to and including ACROSS THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER. But because they are two small and sometimes sharp, they literally cause damage in the body, over and over again. Leading potentially to vascular damage, or damage to any tissues it encounters. If in cardiovascular system, it literally can damage the usually hyper-smooth vessel walls. Similarly other tissues.
But, they don't WANT you to understand that the mechanism that makes the side effect more understood is easily understood. That would mean it would make perfect SENSE as to why some of the effects (EFFECTS, not "side" effects) are so extremely harmful and/or fatal. Which would put accountability of prior knowledge directly on them. So they just act like "who KNOWS why that could be... but hey.. it happens... no more connected to reason or logic than why that one dude from the small town won the Power Ball. But it's a lie and an excuse. I know... and so do they. The difference is that I'm not trying to gaslight you into thinking that something with major risks is something you are insane or a criminal or both if you doubt.*
RELATED EPISODES:
TSOT025: Journal Articles: Ground-shaking Dot Connecting. On Adjuvants, Nanoparticles, Toxicity, autoimmunity. By man's choice.TSOT026: Nanoparticles, autoimmunity, hypothyroidismQROT-042: Takedown of Pf-LIE-zer CEO's most recent spewingQROT-080: Science says nanoparticles CAUSE autoimmunity. But "Science" says we should use them to treat autoimmunity.QROT-089: Pf-lie-zer zombie "Lil Tweed" imagines its smart to choke a giant man asking questionsTSOT052: Pf-LIE-zer CEO admission: The FIRST time Pfizer uses the "tech", it's when BILLIONS are in the crosshairs=================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
[NOTE: This episode was accidentally populated with the same audio as QROT-111. Replaced with proper audio on 3/9/24]
Spoiler: An opinion of an organization being "hopelessly corrupt" turns into an opinion of "insufficent evidence" as a function of just how corrupt the organization is, once a threshold is met.
Plus... if 95% of "Rs" practically act just like "RINOs"... then...
The proof is there. Stop stalling with the idea that it is not and that you still need to investigate.
A follow-up to QROT-110.
=================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Another way, outside of just saying "Oh no, not TODAY" to tell if you're being gaslit, is to compare to a simple similar event.
If a judge in Connecticut, in a primary says that video of ballot stuffing is "shocking" and enough for the ruling to be that the election must be invalidated and a new election must occur.. that's because.. It IS. And you knew that because you have a brain that you've decided to use for analysis that an honest four-year-old could complete with flying colors.
So... compare and contrast. If in other places the same shocking evidence is to be ignored... COULD it BE... that in that case, those committing fraud at the HIGHER level, with ramifications to the entire world, merely have a better propaganda arm with more influence on the media and with more ability to threaten and with more money to bribe?
Yes. =================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
When cities go activist and their lack of common sense results in entirely predictable financial strain.. well.. what do you expect... they want the rest of us to involuntarily bail them out.
LINKS:
https://headlineusa.com/sanctuary-cities-biden-expenditures-illegals/
https://denvergov.org/files/assets/public/v/1/mayor/documents/mayors-letter-to-biden-congressional-leadership_oct2023.pdf
Over 100 Border Entrances Are Welded Open, Biden Auctions Off Border Wall Material
Illegal border crossers since 2021 total more than individual populations of 38 states
Since President Biden has been in office, illegal crossings total more than 8 million
By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor Jun 22, 2023
Attorney General Ken Paxton Sues Biden Administration Over Destruction of Texas Border BarrierBIDEN TSA GIVES ILLEGALS FREEDOM TO FLY February 3, 2022
Catch-and-Bus: Thousands of Freed Border-Crossing Immigrants Are Dispersing Across America
Charters and Greyhound are delivering them where they want to go
By Todd Bensman on March 31, 2021
Illegal border crossings are on the rise: 7,500 migrants were stopped on Sunday alone
Sept. 18, 2023, 4:09 PM CDT By Julia Ainsley
https://gifmm-contigo.com/
RELATED episodes:
TSOT041: Lyins and tigers, monkey business and bare fraud, oh my - [A summary and review of 2K Donkeys]QROT-083: Rebutting a Bombastic Simplistic Dismissal of 2K DonkeysQROT-107: WHAT is Congress WAITING On?TSOT065: Memes? "Election interference". Arresting your political rival? "Not election interference, nothing to see here."QROT-081: A Constitutional Crisis: A reading.QROT-068: NYT Pulitzer Prize Winner Admits FBI Involvement.TSOT028: Ukraine Context - because no one else can stop being indignant long enough to give itTSOT029: Tiktok: Protect Free Speech by Blocking an Entire Country! Chomsky: U.S. Approach to Ukraine "left the domain of rational discourse."QROT-076: The Irony of How the Ukraine History Books Will Read. And Related=================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A Texas teen "really didn’t expect for it to go so left, you know. I know from the video all you see is the bad part about it."
Yes that's right. After all, he said it didn't show where some people shook his hand afterward.
Yeah... they were happy to be a part of your unexpected, sucker punch beatdown. Sure, kid. Or they were trying to be "good sports" so they didn't get punched again.
And we cover another interesting phenomenon where bad behavior is unnecessarily put in better light through acts of omission. And how we are not having national conversations we should be having.
NONE of this is in any way in the spirit of MLK. Instead we are protecting people from bad publicity BASED on skin color. Because our "news" is, as I've said before, much more about news PROGRAMMING, than it is about us having facts and discussions we can and should all be able to participate on. If we did, we might find unity as humans. But they don't want that and they don't believe in that. What they believe in is to specifically judge a story before hand BASED on race. =================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
They say once you know about a certain concept, you can analyze something in a way that you just couldn't before someone got you to understand the underlying, "red pill", concept.
This is the case for planted witnesses and the like.
Being two years behind the analysis of a particular topic, I applied this after 2003 (you do the math).
And once you understand "is that possible" and start to analyze it to particular cases, sometimes things stand out like sore thumbs.
This is a study of such a sore thumb case. A convenient "man on the street" interview with "freelance" "reporter" Mark Walsh, where he miraculously hits all high points of a narrative in less than 42 seconds, literally taking over the interview from the journalist almost immediately. Oh, and adding unsolicted structural engineering opinion, utterly inorganic to the moment.
Follow up to QROT-107
You don't have to take my "put him on a watch list" word for it. How about an esteemed former Representative and Presidential candidate?
He NAILS it here.
Yet now the media will try to spike the story on how Bought-den used the intelligence apparatus' reputation and former members to LIE to spike the story.
Empires have toppled over less corruption. REPUBLICANS!! UPHOLD YOUR SACRED OATH.
Literally a story was spiked because "independent experts" said there was nothing to it. When it turns out that literally none of them apparently did ANY actual research, or they'd have known first what eventually became evident - that the story was entirely true.
But the new nugget is that the experts who applied no expertise were RECRUITED by the accused!
When an election hung on the balance a TRUE story was spiked by experts paid by the accused candidate, who eventually attained the office.
Note I didn't say "won" the election. Nothing in the realm of truth and reality could have gotten him there. But had this story got the traction it factually deserved, then The Big Steal would have been hard due even the most cowardly RINO to accept.
We're a laughingstock. Waste our fortunes with shows of power and might around the globe, while there is a five ring banana republic circus at home.
(foreign leaders: "The 'opposition' can't even unite to effectually oppose a clearly foreign-compromised dementia-filled clown? Well, the American empire is clearly done but for the shouting. They're to be had whenever we want them. Just let's hope the children don't dip into their nukes as a last gasp.")
If policy to better society generally is not what you're arguing for, but instead you're enlisting the weight of the government and the world political apparatus to actively sow disharmony and conflict and chaos, what is it that you are actually standing for?
A likely possibility on why Tucker parted ways.
(Hint: He's tired of cowards trumpeting about getting our country back but then giving in)
Self-explanatory.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show!
Oh vast fool Republicans legislators, don't fall for simple Pavlovian conditioning. If you want to ban Tik Tok because you want to oppose China, then that's a one sentence bill. THIS bill is not that. It defines "unlawful actz" by NOT defining them.
If you want to be a rube that further allows the ruination of discussions if public importance, then this is your bill, but you're in the wrong country and are violating your oath.
As sometimes occurs, an off-the-cuff rant to make a point went larger picture.
How can a simple reaction to a seemingly outrageous claim inform us on how we are to behave in a free society in a way that embraces and preserves that freedom.
In a time and age when I can tell you SOOOO many things that are questionable, yes, you should loudly and CLEARLY bring up inconsistencies you see. No matter what it may imply. Because if not, then how do we decide what we can NOT bring up? And who decides.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show!
An easy way to know enemies of the state, but it is just a matter of degree, is when they say to your face that the best way for the public to get to the bottom of a highly controversial event singed with political zeal from all sides is to make sure we don't release the available evidence for it.
You know... for fear that details may not let them win the narrative that they've consistently screamed for two years.
When people want to hide evidence instead of release it... there MAY be a reason... but carefully consider whether they're instead the special breed of awful human described above.
(HINT: Most likely they are)
People are rotting in a jail without a trial. In any other context, it would be the fertile soil of an innocence project. But here... not only "don't believe your eyes" but "you don't get to see, so we won't allow you to believe your eyes."
But in reality, it's in a way more wussiness out of those that are allegedly more protective or rights... because the public footage that's been out for two years already opens and shuts the case against most of the zero-nuance that is spewed at us.
But again.. those enemies of the state that don't want the DC-controlled footage released definitely will not acknowledge ANY inconvenient truth on the already-available footage. You can not trust them to say anything except 2 plus 2 equals FIVE(!) if adding it up properly hurts their deceptive and criminal cause.
A review and analysis of two articles that are redemption for those of us not being unpaid informal employees of Big Pharma marketing teams.
Soooo many connections to what we (me, or Kim, or Kim and me, along with countless other dissidents) have been saying for over 2 1/2 years now.
Study finds circulating spike proteins a key post-vax problem, which highlights the study "Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis."
https://www.wnd.com/2023/01/study-finds-circulating-spike-proteins-key-post-vax-problem/?ats_es=0178784c10a6f6cdf0288631d1597c33
Adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: the spike hypothesis
https://www.cell.com/trends/molecular-medicine/fulltext/S1471-4914(22)00103-4#
Related Episodes:
QROT-050: Spike proteins in the virus are AWFUL for you. And the vaccine MAKES your body PRODUCE them. But don't worry - we tell them to be good guys then
QROT... errr... TSOT059: The Parallels are Now Complete
QROT-098: Sand-sized clots. The other threat.
QROT-094: STUDY: Indications of heart damage in ALL studied
TSOT043: Cardiologist who earlier said any concern was "irrational" and based on lies bothers to investigate, and reverses course entirely
QROT-080: Science says nanoparticles cause autoimmunity. But "Science" says we should use them to treat autoimmunity.
TSOT036: Sudden Death Syndromes. In Australia, not just for children anymore
TSOT025: Journal Articles: Ground-shaking Dot Connecting. On Adjuvants, Nanoparticles, Toxicity, autoimmunity. By man's choice.
QROT-063: A Bibliography for Upcoming Episodes
QROT-054: Straight admission of GoF when it was banned. Other insights into how the demon and his ilk ignore law
QROT-036: The Most Relevant of Admissions - short version of previous episode
QROT-035: CDC admits basic facts we reported many times in the last year. 20 months After Science Told Them
QROT-29: Specific Cites for TSOT021. Blowing up lie of "mysterious" "stress disorder," and putting blame where it belongs
TSOT021: Mysterious new "stress disorder" that magically has same life-threatening effects as the medical solution everyone was browbeaten to undergo
QROT-25: As Clearly as You Can Explain It.
QROT-24: Expert cardiologist confirming my points, plus developments
QROT-07: Putting to Bed Any Doubt on Lab Origin - 2015 Journal Article
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show!
As predicted, they are and will con you to believe in health history revision.
But it doesn't make it true.
(and making this so short, I left out - they thought it was so rare that it was suspicious for the deceased. And indeed, instead it was foul play that killed her)
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show!
An emphasis to appreciate the historical uniqueness, and indeed heroism, of recent revelations.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show!
We covered a lot of things this year. Here's a rundown of the episodes and a review of some of the biggest ideas!
This is a great reminder of our journey and signposts to the episodes you will want to listen to again or for the first time.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show!
Remember that whole trick where no matter how much we cite, when we're not a professional in the field then the disingenuous try to dismiss the facts we present?
Well, now Cali takes all the art and observation and experience that experts in the field DO cultivate, and tells them they cannot share their opinion, unless it already agrees with the "consensus" (narrative). To share any "maverick" or dissenting opinion is "professional misconduct." Making one wonder than how anything can be discussed that covers ANY nuance past what the Big Pharma glossy literature on their product is.
Even as those closest to the situation are the ones MOST likely to have unique observations if something is going wrong. Even as the "consensus" is instead filled with a bunch of others not at the front lines of the field who instead are often just parroting what they're told.
Truly the beginning of the end of medical truth generally in California, and definitely and absolutely the end of it specifically for "Covid-19" and the mRNA-based sacred cow "solutions" to it.
And absolutely the end of the doctor-patient relationship for covid-19 in California. If you ask a question, the doctor might have a certain opinion. If that opinion may not be absolutely straight down the middle of the common narrative, now he or she is professionally obligated to HIDE that opinion from you. To literally NOT recommend to you what he or she actually thinks is the best course. The physician is professionally obligated to either not give you any information, or to lie and tell you the mainstream narrative instead of what he or she actually knows. Yet it will still present to you as though it IS their advice.
Also a quick preview on what I might cover next (though the subject is certainly tough to wrangle).
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show!
Finally we at least impliedly understand the threat to a nation's identity and essential character that uncontrolled borders can be.
Oh yeah... Only for the country our tax dollars are used to seriously protect.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show!
The Parallels between the 1980s crisis and the current matter are now near perfect.
(BONUS: Added silliness at end. Maybe last five minutes.
(WAS going to be a Quick Rant of Truth, but as is my way and as is a strength of this show, we go with the flow off the cuff)
["explicit" for mild, but definitely NSFW few words within the same few minute period]
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
What stands in for cover for the Bought-den administration in late 2022? Merely not being guilty of the highest level of ineptitude.
("So you're saying it could have been worse, but they weren't quite THAT stupid?"
"Yes, Janet - I can confirm today that their level of plain and clear ineptitude is obvious and laughable on its own, for the particular question of whether they were even more inept or willfully neglectful, the answer is a definite 'no'")
PFF.
In other news, I've won the PowerBall, and if you just take me to the circus on your dime, you can have my winnings. Deal? Sounds fair to me.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
The Arizona official put it better than I did - from traditional investment firm to political action committee.
But it's worse than that - by insisting companies take certain stands, "or else!!!" they'll be removed from BlackRock's index funds, and similar threats, BlackRock becomes the de facto Board for any company it wants to, for whatever key decisions BlackRock insists upon.
This turns a leviathon, already controlling or influencing billions in investor dollars, into a direct controller of companies and the free market.
A political action committee is one way to put it, but just a small part of the description. Because what political action committee controls billions of dollars of investor funds and can cause direct financial harm to whoever disagrees with its agenda.
Truly a horrific amount of power for one entity.
Arizona has it right, and other states need to take the same actions.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
In previous episode I mentioned this, so thought I'd cover the specifics.
1947, 1963, Bay of Pigs, Truman op-ed, JFK, Dulles.
Betrayal of mission. Lying Agencies.
Quotes from the source of Truman expressing his regret - an op-ed published 12/22/63, exactly one month after the infamous 11/22/63 and its loss of a President.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
[CORRECTION: At 11:00 I incorrectly mentioned Operation Paperclip, when I clearly did not mean the infamous Nazi scientist influx, but instead meant Operation Mockingbird - the infamous capturing of journalists by the CIA and/or literal planting of agents into "journalism"]
[Clarification: Went past my skis in explaining, at about 22:52, the China World Cup coverage, and never actually explained the basics before analyzing it - some of China's coverage shows the players wearing masks, even though the players are not wearing masks]
Nikolai Mushegian
Listen - not everything is proven at any given moment. Crimes are certainly not solved because they're known up front.
Crowd-sourced investigation, potentially of infinite value, is also related to crowd-sourced speculation.
Because until you piece together what MAY have happened, you don't know what to look for and how to proceed.
NEVER, EVER apologize for speculating on big, important topics. But also note frankly, as I am now, that you do not know the entirety.
(nor would any investigative agency know the entirety, until many, many man hours had been burned - is that to mean we're not supposed to show an awareness of it? Is it to mean that curiosity and a drive for truth is to be extinguished, except for in the cases that they virtue-signal greenlight us to think of?*)
*Hint... if that is the route, NONE of the biggest crimes by the biggest players would be on the list that gets virtue-signal greenlighted for us to think of. It is why we must STUBBORNLY discuss those things that they don't want us to. They must be afraid of our inherent strength. That means strength not just to defend, but to think.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
With the permission of my co-host over at Kimology 411, this is my first "Archive of Truth" which will consist of previously produced material.
In this case, we pull from Episode 78 of Kimology 411.
For the full episode we pulled this from:
https://anchor.fm/kimology411
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A couple of absolute gems on how to approach things in your life, from giants in the field, Wayne Dyer and Bob Frissell.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
... With an extra helping of frustration fueled rage.
Just being real, y'all. If you're not raging SOMETIMES in this era, then I worry about your intelligence, your sanity, your honesty, or some combination of them.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
In previous episodes I've explained why I feel like the pied piper of heart valve problem stories. And here, yet another just is blurted in front of me (and I'm the only one to see the pattern - everyone else just of course thinks "that's just too bad for you!").
Using some logic, we speculate on what some institutions, like airlines and pro sports franchises, MUST be doing. Hint: The truth, and necessary actions, now are flourishing only on the "black market." Just the way in the former Soviet Union, when people waited in lines to get bread, much of the successful economy was in the black market. Because the official market followed nonsensical rules.
An an appeal to said industries, where their risk and their value pivots HUGELY on the health of certain key personnel.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
TLDL: what in goodness gracious is so hard about just using ads that are not de facto spyware? Why does every alternate platform feel they have to be so ingenious and bring on crypto or crypto like mechanisms for funding?
I PLEAD with Brave, Odysee, Bitchute, Brighteon, Rumble and the like - stop "pay for play" and subscription and strange crypto concepts, and go back to a tried-and-true - Ads.
Just ads as they existed before foogle* turned ads into spyware.
*We all know that company is an f-word
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Further thoughts and observations on the Stepford Wife interview and the Nuremberg 2.0 worthy interviewee (Alfred Bourla, Pfizer CEO), covered in TSOT052.
Among the gems...
Stepford wife says, with zero irony or skepticism, how, despite these trillions being puked at Big Pharma... "for our health"... that health emergencies are predicted to come along much faster. ?????? Now why in HELL would that be the case, non-player character?
CEO Alfred Bourla, a true demon on the level of Fauci (just go look up his condescending, threatening interviews about those who will not comply), admits in a friendly environment some interesting things.
NO "successful" use of it prior.
But don't worry.. they met for two days to convince this "very skeptical" CEO.
But then also we hear the true motivation ("better tech" solutions for all vaccines and other applications)
And the third thing he says mRNA applies to is... gene therapy.. .which he says is not ready yet.
Okay... think through that again. Remember all that "it's not gene therapy"... but he says mRNA is used for gene therapy.. But they've only used it for "vaccines" but not "gene therapy" yet. Two plus two equals five.
Recent developments on topics discussed in prior episode, and then a recitation of not-so-subtle "subtlety" by Scott Adams.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A follow-up to QROT-097.
We have repeatedly discussed the deadly "artery pasta" threat.
But what about this "the blood is different" claims. I explain the latter and emphasize why after watching this great documentary the case for the former is well founded.
_ied_uddenly
_tew _Peters
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
A big reason extra disinfo may come out today or soon.
A potential mass misdiagnosis on what is probably huge numbers of "heart valve problems". A possibly fundamental answer to this news epidemic.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Two examples of people apparently operating purely off of the latest behavior "coding download."
American Sign Language signer for stage production fired for his skin color. Logic be damned.
Boy appropriates Miss America affiliated contest, and "wins."
You are more. Do you intend to submit to simplified, even quite illogical and inconsistent, and often contradictorily NOT empathetic, automatic behavior coding?
Don't walk into corners of the walls of logic repeatedly because your programming is so simple that it doesn't tell you to not bump into the walls. Don't be a non-player character.
Don't be the Agent Smith... the agent of the larger attempt to control the world through mass download of millions of programs that police society.
Literally the more people we have operating from their own source, their own consciousness, their own logic and autonomy and investigation and knowledge of the world and their well-informed skepticism, the more freely we are operating as humans. Literally we are more free.
The automatic behavior downloads are the enemy.
[CORRECTION. Repeatedly I said lats when I meant traps]
An overview of Elaine Petrone's method and why it makes sense. The bow-and-string analogy. Some overlapping with Egoscue's brilliant "pain free" approach.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Additional article.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Exploring nuances and / or potential outright contradictions in mainstream thought is not "anti" anything. Rather, it is pro-discussion, pro-intellectual growth, pro-freedom.
And that is exactly how ANYONE posting a link to a documentary should be considered.
Would you rather they just post T-and-A?
The NBA, as usual, should be embarrassed by whenever it tries to dip its toes into politics or policing the political speech of anyone.
So, what is it that was so worthy of punishment? A viewpoint hilariously in line with common sense, and of course also right in line with recent related scientific investigation.
See... what is supposed to happen is that we continue to explore and question and
consider. That is PRO a lot of things. It is "anti" nothing. Unless you're just an a-hole wanting to make someone appear to be a mean person.
And if you're disingenuously shutting down what is creative discussion into nuance and the mysteries of history, then you're the mean person whose tyrannical point of view should be given no credence.
A discussion of the two other recent instances of this psychological terrorism trying to keep us from considering and discussing things.
And we read the "took 10 seconds to find" article that backs up the incredibly obvious potential truth.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
In QROT-095, I teased we'd go with three episodes (including that one) about developments on the heroic efforts of one organization.
In this episode, like a Malone or a McCullough, once you show in this climate of dissenters being smashed that you will not be silenced, more truth tellers are drawn to you. So the heroes in the present case got info from a whistleblower.
After trying to work with the FBI, which was interested at first, but then turned the cold shoulder (you know, because election integrity investigations aren't that important, right? Isn't that what the news cycle in 2017-2019 taught us? OhWAITItToldUsTheOPPOSITE, as does common sense). After getting the cold shoulder from federal "law enforcement", the heroic organization went public to try to further crowd source the investigation.
So what does the accused do? Well... legally terrorize their accusers. But wait... not even the company so much as the CEO says the accusations are baseless and... offffff course "RACIST". Which of course was not the motivation whatsoever.
Worse, the judge is giving this terrorism teeth by holding the heroes to contempt of court.
WorsTTTT, the judge (dumb, insane, senile, corrupt?) is somehow not taking into account that there is now no less evidence that the claims were NOT "baseless" than a literal arrest of the CEO of the company!!!
And so heroes set in jail unnecessarily.
==================
Related Episodes:
QROT-095: Election Season. GREAT news in Georgia. TSOT041: Lyins and tigers, monkey business and bare fraud, oh my - [A summary and review of 2K Donkeys]
QROT-083: Rebutting a Bombastic Simplistic Dismissal of 2K Donkeys Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Secretary of State actually investigating. The overwhelming and transparent data was not enough but now someone has admitted what they did personally and it got the attention of the Secretary. 4500 ballots deposited by this one fellow alone, and he's giving details.
Also teases for next episodes.
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Studies occur. Just a matter of how loudly they're trumpeted.
Dramatic stuff. Even if predictable for those paying attention early to details rather than ether-saturating Must-Think.
(Also, how about that intro tho'??!!! ;-) )
Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Man, who needs Baphomet horns (surprisingly prevalent this year, versus any previous year, but that's a different story), when you've got this stuff going on.
I do mention discussing porosity in another episode, and could not quote which one. Since recording, I looked around to find that episode, and I do believe it is on Kimology 411, and not The Scales of Truth, but I have not yet quite found the episode.
But for that, you can go to Kimology 411 and peek around, either at your favorite podcast platform, or at the originating one - https://anchor.fm/kimology411
=================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
One of "dual mandates": stabilizing prices.
Umm...
uhh...
Stabilized prices since 1913?
After we laugh at the inherent tragic comedy, we look at specific numbers and compare to what happened before this wonderful mechanism to make sure we're all doing okay got put in place.
And what it REALLY is doing, by not (even coming close to) fulfilling its mandate.
Wait.. mandate.... doesn't that mean price stabilization is MANDATORY???
=================================================Thanks for listening! Please email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Remember to follow my show so you know when new episodes come up and (channeling youtubers)... "SMASH that Like button!" Or press it softly. However.
A bit of quick fun with two of our favorite sources of purposely not reprehensible fake news.
Analysis on a couple of ideas:
Serious allergic reaction (to point of death) being a known problem.
Another funeral director steps forward.
Includes mentions of related topics.
(Explicit just for a few comedic uses of "the S-word.")
=================================================Thanks for listening! Please email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Remember to follow my show so you know when new episodes come up and (channeling youtubers)... "SMASH that Like button!" Or press it softly. However.
A couple of quick tips on keeping your sense of balance. Prompted by an email I received mentioning a Harvard study. And the Harvard study overlaps with what I've read in one of my favorite books, "Pain Free," by Pete Egoscue.
=================================================Thanks for listening! Please email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
As an emphasis for the blood-in-water for Pf-lie-zer, another company is suing them for intellectual property rights with the vacks.
A large man asks questions at a Pf-lie-zer meeting. A not-large man tries to choke him. Hilarity ensues.
=================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
Thoughts on a great concept from Wayne Dyer and others. It is not that your thoughts are your thoughts are your thoughts. Instead imagine your thoughts as what you choose from an almost endless list at any given moment. And when and if you grab one that is rotten or doesn't serve you, you don't have to keep it. As you get better, you may pull your hand back as you're reaching for it. Or drop it as soon as you see it is rotten.
This really spoke to me a couple weeks back or so when I first read it. I hope it speaks to you and helps you too!
=================================================Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
0:00 Why I haven't cited specific things for you yet about the white fibrous materials in the cardio system.
1:02 Initial listing to two specific articles and a good site generally.
Embalmers reporting strange findings in bodies since start of covid vaccine. Daily Patriot Report, curating and capturing from other sources.
sensereceptornews.com Another funeral director and embalmer says he's been finding white fibrous structures in dead people since the rollout of the covid 19 vaccines
2:43 Quotes and summary from first article
6:30 Summary and quotes from second article
Both of course fixed with plenty of analysis and dot connecting to previous points made.
28:04 Done with articles, but further analysis and commentary: What to look for in the real world now across the population group - lower cardiovascular capacity generally. Who I DO feel sorry for, and why. The "truth" is out, but it is not "out" for everyone - for THOSE folks that don't know they have to go into dark alleys to get the truth, they do NOT have the truth, and so THEY are at more risk. And it is the MSM's straight fault, for first pushing for alienation of any and all alternative media sources, and then for not filling the void they've created and for not fulfilling their professional responsibilities.
35:00 listing of related episodes
QROT-022, QROT-024, QROT-025, TSOT021, QROT-029, QROT-033, QROT-063, TSOT025, QROT-067, TSOT033, TSOT036, QROT-078, QROT-079, TSOT043, QROT-086.
38:29 Recitation of logic string pointed out in QROT-029. Repeat of the sources behind the logic string.
Keywords and phrases:
Main Topic:
*White fibrous protein structures, proteinaceous, effects of 25 to 50% impure instructions, not a blood clot. rubbery, embalmer eyewitnesses, amalyoid structures larger than the hand, self-assembling bio-structure, molybdenum,
Adams, Hooker, Ruby, Hirschman, Cole, Looney, Hero funeral directors, embalmers, and doctors speaking truth.*
For topics brought up just as referenced from other episodes: *reason for necessity of toxic adjuvants, iga antibodies, Malhotra's father's death, October 2020 slides with horrific risks barely showed, Ashe AZT Chemotherapy poisoning death. How to turn what may be quite provable to only anecdotal, John Hopkins, Salk Institute, New York Times, CNBC, Univ of Minn, myocarditis, pericarditis.
=================================================*Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!
As revealed in more recent episodes, I do seek for things spiritually and metaphysically here and there.
In this case, a very cool and interesting and I believe key point, by a little bit of a cult legend (no, not like "cult cult".. relax) in the field.
Enjoy.
Thoughts on a fabled number.
(No, this is NOT a usual episode for me)
True, beautiful, mystic.
But is science doing itself a disfavor by not somehow integrating a seemingly more fundamental numeric relationship??
pi, flower of life, reality fundamentals, mystic math. fundamental relationships, physics implications?
(yes, I think about these things too)
There are only sixteen COUNTRIES with a nominal gross domestic product of at least one trillion. And WE are WASTING (soon?) that much money directly.
If we can just stay in the BLACK, sure one could argue that perhaps the spending is not as efficient as it might be in a free market, but at least the money is going to the thing it is supposed to benefit!
But what if we're not in the black, but in a major hole.
And what if instead, the finance fee is larger than the GDP of most countries??
That money is literally coming from us (or from direct debt money) and is literally helping NO government program and ZERO official beneficiaries thereto.
Charlie Bilello
An update:
THE reason for D.C. shaking for over three years, was known early to be clearly potentially political, and not corroborated. Before we thought $50K was offered for the namesake of the "dossier" to corroborate. No. Try a cool million Still not enough to get him to corroborate (ohwaithatisbecauseitisjunkandtheFBIknewItAsSoonAsTheyTalkedToThePrimarySubSource)
Related episode:
Further info:
FBI supervisory counterintelligence analyst Brian Auten was the first witness in the trial of Igor Danchenko, the Russian national who served as the primary sub-source for Steele’s "dossier". Danchenko is charged with five counts of making false statements to the FBI
Auten testified that he and a group of FBI agents went overseas in early October of 2021 to speak with Steele about the dossier. During questioning by Special Counsel John Durham Tuesday, Auten said that during those meetings, the FBI offered Steele $1 million dollars if he could corroborate allegations in the dossier.
Auten testified that Steele could not do so.
** (Recall his defense will probably say, ironically (and why Durham should pursue those in the FBI, and Comey), that the FBI had plenty of information to already know to put no stock in the Dossier. Including Danchenko himself telling him how Steele entirely mischaracterized in major ways the things that Danchenko was the sub-source for. But yet, they did put (at least political... hello) stock into it. So defense may argue that there is no harm. Of course... good luck with that - if you lied, as it appears you did... two wrongs don't make a right. It'd just be nice if the OTHER liars - those that misrepresented the known information and omitted the known contradictions - also got massively punished. Instead of apparently getting keystone kop kid-glove treatment. See these details in the related episode, QROT-084.)
One of the few true heroes of the last three years is tipped off, complete with documents, by Italian activists.
A mere 50% minimum purity level. Meaning, literally, half of it could be giving improper instructions. With improper instructions come who-knows-what proteins being created by the body.
Upon massive backlash to a change in their Acceptable Use Policy, PayEnemy changes their mind, but says it was a mistake. Um. Sure.
We CAN win, but we have to really and truly speak out very fervently. Because the regime(s) are in full-court press right now. Anything short of very loud protest will not be enough.
Epoch:
"The former president of PayPal, David Marcus, wrote on Twitter: 'It’s hard for me to openly criticize a company I used to love and gave so much to. But @PayPal’s new AUP goes against everything I believe in. A private company now gets to decide to take your money if you say something they disagree with. Insanity.'
"Elon Musk liked the tweet.
"Then, Brendan Carr, a commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission, weighed in: 'Orwellian. Paypal reserves the right to take your money if you post a message that Paypal decides is ‘misinformation.’ This is why it is so vital that state and federal legislatures pass laws that prohibit discrimination by tech companies and protect free speech.'”
"Weird Story of... Maybe" ;-)
An odd thing experience. Certainly a mundane explanation might be behind it. But let's relish in the possibility of the strangeness.
A prominent cardiologist in the U.K. who in early 2021 appeared on a national morning show, but since he didn't appreciate the delta between respiratory illnesses getting hundreds of news impressions before it even spreads versus a new one getting BILLIONS of impressions, didn't bother to realize he could be echo-chambered by his uninformed colleagues. As a result, despite not truly looking into it himself (his words - , and so he in essence ridicules those who have concerns, by saying they are believing in social media lies and that their concerns are "irrational."
But then, sadly, his impetus for actually looking into things is a "no good explanation" death in his own family.
Of someone who three years earlier had very minimal plaque and no blood flow decrease, per scans and checkups, but when the person dies, they have 75% and 90% blockage.
What really went on is what I've told you before.
And, unfortunate as the personal tragedy was that got him there, the same cardiologist says nothing more should be done until we completely look at the raw data.
Now he says we should review to determine if there is a net public health benefit. but that's him being conservative and diplomatic. The case study itself, because he has the details, basically indicates, as we've told you over and over again, that the solution is worse, for many demographics, than the problem.
And as we've told you, it is because they took a simple and basic and sound way to create a vack-seen, and partially thanks to the U.S. government's policies that majorly incentivize "new" over "more effective", developed an inelegant and indirect way for the immune system to "recognize" the disease, recklessly assuming that the very effect they want to induce - making the body become a factory for protein structures it would not otherwise create - would result in no overproduction or no unpredictable harms, that someone not thinking with their greed might have seen, since literally you're tinkering with the human cell's protein factories.
Complete with analysis and some refresher of things previously discussed.
That said, related episodes (among many):
QROT-079: Eight hour online meeting with the experts and decison makers, but no time to show the KNOWN risks, second instance
TSOT036: Sudden Death Syndromes. In Australia, not just for children anymore
TSOT033: CONFIRMED - IgA as a VITAL Gap MASSIVELY Reducing "Solution's" Effectiveness. Confirming Tennessee Subcommittee Hearing
QROT-053: Not Charmed. Alyssa's Brain. Hopefully it does not clot.
QROT-038: Burying the lead but at least not avoiding it - NSW - "all but one" in serious condition got the cure
QROT-033: mRNA has taken the headlines. Maybe you mistakenly thought there was a significant alternative. My correction.
QROT-29: Specific Cites for TSOT021. Blowing up lie of "mysterious" "stress disorder," and putting blame where it belongs
QROT-25: As Clearly as You Can Explain It.
QROT-24: Expert cardiologist confirming my points, plus developments
QROT-07: Putting to Bed Any Doubt on Lab Origin - 2015 Journal Article
Ponderings on an important step, that makes the difference between merely continuing to observe your personality flaws or manifestation weaknesses, versus changing them.
As always, I remind myself. As opposed to me "preaching to you" from on high.
Hopefully you find it helpful.
Thank you for listening.
Nice news on podcast progress. Not blowing own horn, but just noting!
What countries are listening! (Thanks, everyone!)
What cities are listening.
Top five episodes by listens.
Another five that I like.
Again, thanks for listening, everyone!
DOJ OIG: The FBI itSELF knew, in JANUARY 2017, through official interviews that Steele's MAIN SUBSOURCE disagreed with the "dossier" but didn't include info in warrant applications
A quick peek at a major conclusion by the Justice Department upon review of FBI acts, that, due to their shortcomings, relatively incapacitated an administration, due to the distractions they provided. When, per a literal Justice Department Office of Inspector General review, they should not have provided such a distraction because the FBI KNEW the evidence was highly questionable but just DID NOT INFORM those deciding on the next dramatic step.
"However, as we explain later, the Crossfire Hurricane team failed to inform Department officials of significant information that was available to the team at the time that the FISA applications were drafted and filed. Much of that information was inconsistent with, or undercut, the assertions contained in the FISA applications that were used to support probable cause and, in some instances, resulted in inaccurate information being included in the applications. While we do not speculate whether Department officials would have authorized the FBI to seek to use FISA authority had they been made aware of all relevant information, it was clearly the responsibility of Crossfire Hurricane team members to advise them of such critical information so that they could make a fully informed decision." . . ."We also found that the FBI's interviews of Steele, his Primary Sub-source, a second sub-source, and other investigative activity, revealed potentially serious problems with Steele's descriptions of information in his reports. For example, as detailed in Chapters Six and Eight, the Primary Sub-source [Igor Danchenko] made statements during his/her January 2017 FBI interview that were inconsistent with multiple sections of the Steele reports, including some that were relied upon in the FISA applications. Among other things, regarding the allegations attributed to Person 1 ["dossier" of Christopher Steele], the Primary Sub-source's account of these communications, if true, was not consistent with and, in fact, contradicted the allegations *of a "well-developed conspiracy" in Reports 95 and 102 attributed to Person 1 .""
. . .*
*"As we describe in Chapter Three, the FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016, just days after its receipt of information from a Friendly Foreign Government (FFG) reporting. . . "
. . .
"We further determined that the Crossfire Hurricane team was unable to corroborate any of the specific substantive allegations regarding Carter Page contained in Steele's election reporting which the FBI relied on in the FISA applications*.
The site at this moment that holds the main DOJ OIG review discussed:
https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf
For when and if the current non-elected one takes further hold our our "law enforcement":
https://web.archive.org/web/20220920104729/https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf
Durham investigation against sub-source Danchenko:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22347938-durham-motion
A follow-up to TSOT041.
Embarrassingly an EFF writer, an allegedly civil libertarian organization, MANGLES the logic behind strong conclusions, in order to get you dismiss those conclusions, or even to dismiss you from going to investigate it from the horse's mouth.
Surprise... with enough other factors included as systematic analysis, there is little difference between "within 15 feet" of a ballt drp bx in a statistical sense, to draw macro conclusions from, and being within six inches of the ballt drp bx.
If you're "only" within 15 feet of said location, but you are that close to TEN of them, that are purposely scattered throughout a city, within the same two-week period during which you're within 15 feet of not one, but FIVE of the organizations that are candidates to supply the material for the fraud, then 15 feet versus one-half inch is just a matter for argument, and does not really affect the statistical likelihood of the conclusion.
(Let alone when because of the data you have you can trace individual routes and see the drop boxes as multiple way points (not merely being passed by) on one long trip around the city. For example. if you legitimately had more than one valid ballot (already an incredible rarity statistically), why would you need to drop by multiple boxes to drop them in, during overnight periods)
Related episode: TSOT041: Lyins and tigers, monkey business and bare fraud, oh my - [A summary and review of 2K Donkeys]
Many of us are vigorous champions for something. Our causes, our businesses, our favorite charities.
But what of another very important thing?
A reminder to myself, that maybe helps you.
It's obvious what happened in the pop-up zoo that had the most visitors 12 months after the 11th month of 2019* . Your instincts were correct if you have instincts. I know that. You know that. But I finally delved into watching and absorbing the important aspects of heroic efforts to prove it.
Grand Canyon State
Badger State
Keystone State (cue the Keystone Kops music, by the way)
The Peach State
The Wolverine State
-The ridiculous solidity of both the day-tuh, the comprehensiveness of it, and of the sources for it.
----- it's the same data already mined on you and sold to brokers as information as commodity).
----- More than a petabite (sp on purpose)**.
----- Ten TRILLION data points.
----- The incredibly safe extra-cautious assumptions as to why we're they've named only 2K donkeys
--------- by taking a few stacked assumptions that together rule out any possible innocent explanation for the lyins' activities by many scales.
----------Absolutely no falss paws itivs.
The general layout of the zoo.
The amazing double-documentation via "zoo video" that shows the same lyins who already have data that confirms what they've done, now seen on camera, via ONLY official video.
The effect of even this HIGHLY conservative count of the lyins on the final result
----- (HINT: Had the zookeepers kept the lyins and the other animals under better control, the head lyin' would not be the head lyin' today.
----- If one brings in more common sense numbers, that can ALSO be directly figured from their dayda, then we see in essence a "mudslide" in the opposite direction. Just like your instincts told you 22 months ago (assuming you have instincts)
Truly this opens and shuts the case on why this zoo is not licensed and should be shut down immediately, and the lyins put down for the diseases they carry and pass on. Please go find the original vid. Support heroes.
There are true heroes in this story - those telling it. What I wouldn't give to be able to be making my living doing these kinds of heroic analyses.
Truly, while standing on the shoulders of giants, this is nonetheless possibly the most important episode I've done. If we'll just ABSORB it for the reality that it proves.
**(sometimes I do the purposeful vagueness and misspells to get around the algo-censoring. A real person MAY just have enough conscience to let it be, if they listen to ANY of this to hear how solid it is. So if I can throw off the robots. And, even though I subscribe to Spotify, I know they at LEAST will try to either sensorrr or try to add "warnings" that psychologically deter or influence certain listeners if they detect certain content. )
* Enough to hold so many 4K movies that you could watch them for 2.5 years non-stop without rewatching any of them. But of course the basic info isn't all the info needed for 4K video, but instead basic format of precise info (latttt/longggg, elevayyshun, fone I-Dee, time stamp).
In other cases, I've read essays that I cherish.
Here, it is a mere post, but that is absolutely spot-on as to the current situation. The current situation a single individual making decisions on up to a TRILLION dollars of taxpayer value.
2:30 The reading
6:50 Reaction and other commentary
---- 7:15 The hang-for-treason-worthy individual admits the limitations. But then decides he will not be so limited, regardless of the setup of our government.
(and let's not forget his previous UNPRECEDENTED unilateral attempts, that were Unconstitutional on its face, but he did it anyway, it gets found clearly unconstitutional, yet we only act as though it was some kind of innocent mistake, instead of a deliberate grab for unprecedented power consolidation into one individual)
9:48 Wharton estimates the dollar value of the unilateral decision - $330 BILLION to almost a TRILLION.
So what more IMPORTANT thing could our (actually) elected leaders do than oppose this???
Related episodes - Other Readings I cherish:
TSOT024: I, Pencil
TSOT023: Reading of "Isaiah's Job". Long live the Remnant!
Other Discussions of the Unelected Usurper, "President" Bought-den*: TSOT040: The Tyrant Consolidates His Power. He has now proven dozens of times he cares neither about "his" country nor about your Constitution's limits unless they're actually enforced against him.
QROT-070: When J.B. Huffin' Talks, Those with Functional Brains Laugh QROT-055: Prez's REVERSE border control: skirting Congress, coercing more, ruining supply chain QROT-16: "Shoo Businesses! We Don't Want You in America" Says the Puppet. QROT-06: Podcaster calls his shot on Ineptness-In-Chief, and JB Delivers
*My nickname for the installed POS, since he is bought and paid for.
For those of you who listen loyally, you'll know the irony / contradiction that is the following "journal article."
"Nanoparticle-based autoimmune disease therapy"
I give a little background, and excerpts from some of the related episodes, and then analyze briefly.
(TLDR (DL?)) on my analysis: Nanoparticles are ADMITTED, in the journals, to CAUSE autoimmune disease!! And at least some of the mechanism is elementary and known!
In other news, crazy people are suggesting that a pack a day would be a great way to treat lung cancer. What with smoking relaxing you and all.
Related episodes:
QROT-063: A Bibliography for Upcoming Episodes
TSOT025: Journal Articles: On Adjuvants, Nanoparticles, Toxicity, autoimmunity. By man's choice. TSOT026: Nanoparticles, autoimmunity, hypothyroidism
During an EIGHT HOUR meeting, the CDC and FDA prove themselves again as the enemy of human safety, as literally while one presenter takes a WHOLE 24 seconds to mention that there is a list of adverts* events, yet the slide is not showing for the first 24.2 seconds, and is gone by 25 seconds. He doesn't list ONE adverse event of interest verbally, and then the slide is somehow "delayed" ("oops")... and shows up for a literal fraction of a second before the next slide shows.
I give you the audio around it, and tell you exactly where to find it. What injuries were listed.
Look for my follow-up also - this speaker says he doesn't want to "dwell on it" since his colleague Tom showed it at the end of his presentation. Leaving you the impression that is where it was covered. Annnnd of course that is wrong as well. Tom didn't even MENTION the slides - he let them flip past, but said not a word about them.
They're purely insane.
*Spelled wrong on purpose - trying to keep the algo-censoring away slightly.
From Demon Fearci's* Mouth.
Wait what? Basic Biology is a thing?
Turns out before he was a mercenary out to execute truth starting in 2020, he could admit such things.
*My nickname for Fauci.
(One choice adjective used is the explicit content)
World Level Experts' Opinion on Russia - Ukraine prior to invasion - Chomsky.
A Bait Job, then eventually a winnable proxy war. The beginnings of fake history. The real reason for the human misery.
In the new context of fantasy world truth, and the inherent tyranny attached, Putin losing, while a win against the immediate misery for Ukrainians, is not at all a win in the larger picture.
With prices soaring, at least partially also affected by fuel price soars, what could be better than good food, that people want, that is independent of those fuel factors?
Well for an administration that hates America, and for its minions, everything is wrong with it.
Why leave alone a good Amish farm giving an honest deal for an honest price, engaging in individual choice with individual consumers, when instead you can terrorize them, and add further to the food crisis.
Armed Federal Agents Recently Raided Amos Millers Successful Organic Meat & Dairy Farm In The Old Amish Village Of Bird-In-Hand, Pennsylvania
Further proof, as now flows in microsecond-by-microsecond, that this government is no longer upholding your fundamental rights, but is often instead attacking them, and seemingly this administration (though it may have not had a hand in this exact act) seems bent on bringing down America.
If you give a man an inch to a man so desperate for power that he'd say he was second in his law school class when he was about 50th percentile, he'll take a mile.
He, man of immeasurable foreign and other compromise and known ties, now uses federal law enforcement to terrorize a former President.
He must go. Authorities must be given the power to stop him. Congress must stand and make this their only goal. He is using the trappings of power to cover his criminality. He has shown no qualms motivated by any Constitutional concern. So those concerned with the Constitution must do something to stop his reign over the controlled demolition of our economy and now our political institutions.
A quick follow-up to QROT-073.
After over two years where many people were starting to think more for themselves about the mechanisms they've allowed to be put in place that were used against them, and who it was who mostly supported the mechanisms being used against them, the population was ready to lean towards kicking out folks most strongly against basic liberties in the real world.
And, now, ironically, based on one issue, a particular chance to restore the authority of what the law means back to the people, is interpreted by a mass majority of those in the Sunflower State to mean the opposite. So they vote no, which really supported 14 judges deciding, based on their whims, not the words of the history of the Constitution, what it means.
Anti-Liberty. But so emboldened are the liars to say black is white, that labeled themselves "for Constitutional Freedom." And now those same folks who were waking up at various levels from the true tyranny of two years have dropped right back into their duality mindset.
Predictable - and Kim and I predicted it on Kimology as the Dobbs (Roe) decision approached and then happened. But still sad.
A follow-up to TSOT038 and TSOT039.
Can someone object to an Amendment to their Constitution? Yes.
But it's a bloody shame when the majority most likely objected to it for the exact wrong reasons.
Do the most "offended" of us get to bully us out of our freedom to discuss politics in this, the most political time in the history of the planet?An incident in the United Kingdom.
00:41: The general template of the problem.
1:07: The irony - the problem to be solved is instead increased.
1:38: A British Veteran Arrested at Home under British Censorship Laws after Re-posting . . . meme that caused anxiety.
A symbol that clearly has political implications... so clearly a political opinion.
3:08 Delving into the details of the article.
4:25 A most important idea, constantly neglected.
5:32: Audio from incident.
"It didn't have to come to this". A laughable non-point.
6:19 back to article.
7:14 First option - no "arrest" if you pay up and get re-educated.
9:56 The alleged law that validated the police visit (but did it though)
11:32 At least Crime Commissioner stood up for common sense.
11:59 You need "greater clarification" on the law? No. No you don't - it didn't apply. Here's why...
Ummm... everything is politics... if you pay attention, and don't get "anxious" then you're lying.
18:37 Not a case of something bad being imminent. And not bullying.
20:01 What if a particular party in the 1930s and 1940s could use the excuse that your criticism caused them "anxiety" to quell your opinions?
21:00 What if the American Regime could hide behind the idea of ethnicity to shut down criticism?
22:54 But what if regimes, inherently imperfect and capable and guilty of bad things CAN claim the idea of "Anti[ethnic group]ism".
24:35 For an analogy, let's say the same treatment could be applied to other situations... someone has "anxiety" over me calling them and/or their acts out?
27:28 back to article
Political opinion is a "hate crime"
30:05 What withers in a thought crime tyrannical society
A follow-up for the August 2nd vote, from TSOT037. Including analysis, and cites to information found in news articles. * Text + Ballot Explanatory statement ( 00:58 ) + Amendment language ( 2:25 ) + Analysis on a misunderstood phrase (No, this isn't changing some part of the Constitution or the ability for people to generally have a direct say ( 3:48 )) * What Supreme Court case did and will do. ( 5:25 ) + 2011 law, 2015 law currrently overturned because they have been challenged + Others a possibility - would require a court challenge. + Analysis on the new "strict scrutiny" standard and its potential affects on existing laws if they're challenged. ( 10:01 ) * What amendment would do. ( 13:43 ) + Automatic or not? Does it matter? ( 15:56 ) + Regardless, some are ready to go. (16:33 ) + A further distinction - the amendment could be challenged ( 17:48 ) + It would affect existing appeals. * Lies in advertising ( 19:58 ) - a heartbreaking story for a mother, but not particularly relevant to the arguments at hand.
Analysis of August 2nd, 2022 statewide vote regarding abortion. Motivation. What it does and does not mean. Parallel to Dobbs, which overturned Roe v Wade, and Casey, which previously upheld Roe (while also changing it significantly)
Includes primer on Roe, Casey, and Dobbs, and the 2019 Kansas Supreme Court case that the state amendment is really about.
NOTE: Follow-up on way night of August 1, where I will back up my logic on the narrowness of the Amendment, with other brief analysis.
We've seen the pattern countless times since March 2020, and even before - events happening for which all of history shows tendencies nowhere near in line with the nearly successive events that, conveniently, wreak chaos on the world or a particular country.
In a main state of cattle country, in certainly hot, but not record heat for the hotter times of the year, THOUSANDS of head dying? Nope. They died. But heat is not the reason.
At some point even the series of highly improbable events, seemingly unrelated, cross the threshold of being so impossible both individually and as a series, as to basically prove they ARE related.
More "technocracy" and "science" covering, through denial of obvious potential connections, for toxicity in the environment.
How to tell when a "climate activist" is just a mascot to change the world in a different way?
When she speaks at a body that perfectly well has the power to stop any number of very specific threats to human (and all other) biology but chooses to stop none of them. But still uses a tiny, quite-outraged mascot to promote the idea of global control to "save the world."
And how this ties into another interpretation of Problem-Reaction-Solution. A subject I've discussed prior.
My recent research adventures introduced me to several minds that I think you might be interested in, if you're as interested as I am in that spark that happens when you realize you've stumbled on ideas and people who may help you further understand reality.
Just a tease on four potential paths for you.
Bruce Cathie
Jain 108
Rudolf Steiner
Elana Freeland
Amazing stuff.
Thanks for listening - please add or like my podcasts or episodes, and select a notification technique so you know when new ones hit!
Appreciate you joining me as we try to understand the world more clearly together.
Our alleged illustrious leader(ish) using his world-class economic expertise... ahem... to insist, in his own mind, and to the clapping (seals?) in the audience that throwing trillions into the purposefully crippled economy has nothing to do with inflation. OHbutno, he doesn't even say it that honestly. He misrepresents as though those objecting to such irresponsible bankster enabling and shilling are really saying just any old government spending is what causes inflation.
Truer words have never been spoken.
A CEO speaks of why his alternate platform has flourished, and dashes directly the assumptions of narrative-spewer reporters.
(now whether the intelligence rag Washington Post LISTENED to the CEO after they asked him the questions directly is another story)
But the beauty and clarity of his answers are worthy of note and of analysis.
A follow-up to QROT-067, in which I included audio from a pair of doctors testifying at a state house subcommittee the problem of the "big pharma solution" is that it stimulated almost no IgA, which is vital for the solution to actually treat a respiratory illnesses.
The source, an NIH article*:
"Most [sacred-cowed big pharma solutions] are delivered intramuscularly, and mucosal immunity and IgA secretion IS THEREBY MINIMAL. Furthermore, ELICITING IgA PRODUCTION from conventional vaccines is DIFFICULT, and [sacred-cowed big pharma solutions] may LACK the immunogenicity required to elicit NECESSARY IgA PROTECTION."
"... respiratory viruses are ESPECIALLY DIFFICULT to protect against with [the usual solution]."
"One reason for... FAILURE against respiratory viruses is that the respiratory tract, including the lungs, is an external surface that is PROTECTED BY THE GENERATION OF IGA ANTIBODIES; yet, the antibodies measured to determine whether an experimental subject has 'responded' . . . often focus on IgG, IgM, or total immunoglobulin in the blood. "
Thanks for listening. I am not on social media much, so please "like" directly on the podcast or specific episode. Also, activate notifications so you can more consistently find out about episodes to which you may want to listen
*COVID-19 . . . Frontrunners and Their Nanotechnology Design"
Note though that I referred in the podcast to this as a study. It is a review.
A day-to-day example of how you'd better be careful how quickly you believe advertising that even some over-the-counter medicine should just be your daily friend.
Why... a "side" effect with massive implications on your health, should you fall for the trap of taking it daily.
A review of two key documents by the FDA. High Points:
PCR tests, by dozens, and then hundreds of manufacturers, were not based off an actual clinical specimen. Instead, manufacturers were instructed to, in essence, come up with their best guess of covid-ish for their tests to detect, through any number of "contrived" means (Yes, the FDA literally describes them as "contrived." Multiple times)
Once the FDA did allegedly come up with a good specimen, only a couple of months into the exercise, they did not make manufacturers then create tests based on that standard.
So all along, until the PCR tests were discontinued from emergency use at the end of 2021, they varied so widely that the FDA literally says it doesn't make much sense to even compare them.
But, to the extent they did - by comparing their performance, in sensitivity to detect the standard specimen, PCR tests varied by over 3,000-fold, depending on manufacturer!
Thanks for coming on this ongoing journey of discovery and emphasis of important truths and distinctions.
As always, the facts do not matter whether "the paper of record" acknowledges them.
But it is nice to hear confirmation.
We told you background and details here on the Scales of Truth on QROT-20, and QROT031. And here we quote and listen to the audio of the NY Times reporter discussing the agency involvement on 1/6. He doesn't go into detail as to how much they were involved with the most infamous aspects - see those related episodes for that.
I spend less than half a week on understanding Russia - Ukraine, and tell you more in my first foray than the entirety of the narrative if you listened to them for 100 hours straight.
Because I read what actual foreign policy experts say. Not our jackass political pukes.
ANNND now the proof - from the horse's mouth itself (Putin). Literally sounds like a reading of the situation from one of my recent episodes.
(speech audio included.)
Spoiler - when you put weapons at the door of an enemy, in the same vein as the Soviets tried to put missiles in Cuba, or make arrangements to be able to, it tends to give them some existential concerns.
When you break your long-term promise to allow a buffer zone. And you break it five times. It tends to cause existential concerns.
Why stick to merely providing a simple to-the-point service for individuals who want to pay for it by their own free will. As free enterprise as you can get.
When instead you can act like you have any clue about international relations. And in fact can ACT like you are a world-level oracle on it.
And remove your service as an option for an entire population, most of which had nothing to do with the acts of their leaders. When you never did directly support the leader, and your actions don't harm him. Only the citizens. Because that's where we are - real free market be damned - your corporate political rabidity and loyalty to the clothe less emperor is your required identity.
Nuremberg 2.0, Reason 3. Distraction forever so we don't focus on their crimes. But criminals don't get it - they can't stop doing it. So we see them for what they are at every new turn.
'Member when we were theoretically scared to death of orange man starting wars with world powers? Ahhhh the good ole days when an actual crazy person, as opposed to one the loonies tried to convince us was one, wasn't in the Oval Office.
Audio from a video on red voice media, but that is clearly the public broadcast video of (3/1/22?) testimony by a Dr. Ryan Cole and another doctor, before a subcommittee hearing. HB1871.
Scientifically clear that the "solution":
does not prevent acquisition of the disease
does not prevent transmission - those who got the solution can acquire and transmit at equal volumes.
does not prevent illness from the disease
does not prevent death from the disease
In fact, all-cause mortality has been shown to be higher in numerous studies among those who have received the "solution" versus those who have not.
"Secretory Iga is the most abundant antibody in our body and it does not get stimulated from any of these [solutions]. . . . Secretory Iga is in the respiratory system, and that is one of the main reasons why [people who've taken the solution] are harboring more [of the problem]
Univ of Wisc., Univ of Calif, a Vietnam study(?), and others.
Plus analysis and commentary.
Further analysis of the Ukraine- Russia situation.
How a newly prominent platform has "punished" Russia's stance on free speech byyyyyy... removing all Russian's ability to use their platform.
Noam Chomsky, in February before invasion, discussing how the American approach was bent on one approach, that no one in thinks was plausible, in a way that unnecessarily threatened Russia. Despite the fact that the template for what would work already exists, with three other countries. For those countries, everyone is happy. But for Ukraine, the U.S. insists on an unnecessary approach that makes Ukraine akin to Bay of Pigs.
They can't say we couldn't have had a cooler head.
So the question becomes why we did not.
Orange man somehow never got us here. So why does "harmless" old basement Uncle Joe get us here.
Did Russia specifically invade? Yes. But do we know what we did to quite possibly feel he needed to? Yes. We know exactly what we did. And it was decidedly stupid. Unless we wanted it.
"Not only won't we give full context in a topic of world-level importance, but if you TRY to, we'll shut you down."
Seem familiar? It should.
If your position cannot wither before all the facts being shown, then it is quite possibly a bad position. Or you're a tyrant regardless. Or both.
Great stuff, including audio from an expert, for if you're like me and wondering "okay, what are they not telling me."
It's a narrative world, and you actively have to look for the big picture. And not just nuances, but the most fundamental part of the big picture.
This is not to say Russia is right, or Ukraine is wrong. Just information that makes it not the slam dunk "Russia bad, Ukraine good" nonsense polar take of nearly all lamestream.
Further, it is especially important because we are sowing seeds of war instead of diplomacy, through violations of basic Diplomacy 101 and Sanctions 101 principles. Because why have context, or consider potential consequences, we our alleged learned institutions can instead just be the mutual Mayors of Hot Take City, like the stakes are no greater than Stephen A Smith's takes on the Knicks.
A two-and-a-half part episode.
First, a tease / bread crumb on a great expert likely worthy of follow-up due to his clearly fastidious ways, on two subjects:
Details on "Russia Gate".
(at 3:48) Its predecessor scandal that started the tradition of all big scandals getting "gate" tagged to the end of their nickname.
We discuss his source material, some of which I've sampled, that is very worthy of following up on.
Then (at 10:10), information from insurance companies - as close to "we need data because that's what matters" as you get, that show a giant spike in the last half of 2021, of a very important metric to prove what is really going on...
If the property insurance analogy were used, the spike would be equivalent to dwarfing the "once every two hundred years flood"
Except it is rubber-meets-the-road , as provable as you can get data - how many life insurance payouts occurred.
But not in the first one, two, or four seasons after the alleged great plague. No. Rather, with timing corresponding to people fully taking the "solution" for it. And /or taking the second part of the "solution". And/or the THIRD part of the "solution."
So where could a once-in-a-millenium difference in death come from? Well, as an expert quoted herein says "we can debate it, but I know where it came from. You know where it came from."
Also at least from this big-time risk / investment analysis expert, some good news - as he believes something resembling justice will happen and cannot be avoided.
Includes source audio.
Thanks for listening!!
A follow-up to TSOT025 and QROT-063.
With most of main content in the first 35 minutes or so, then some analysis and further pull-togethers of previous topics and points.
A bit of a follow-up on ideas discussed in the previous episode. When your product is discussion, allowing that, when competitors are not and are trying to convince you not to, is your golden egg.
Without that advantage, they have levelled the playing field. And otherwise have large advantages over you. So don't cooperate. Be competitive. And certainly survive, and possibly flourish.
To take on a contributor whose brand includes controversy and edge-of-mainstream, because he is hugely popular, but then to muzzle him, is to waste money.
A discussion of the miracle of the JRE, in any other context except the 2020-infinity neverending-story emergency.
And briefly how Spotify, or anyone else, sit on a goldmine when they have truth seekers among their contributors, in days of truth smashing.
A bit on how "irresponsible" facts from mere weeks ago are now being ushered as evident.
A comprehensive pull-together of info from the sources, among others, listed in QROT-063.
There you'll find some of the many scientific journal articles that are citations for this.
If you stay patient you'll learn as much about the inner workings of science in this particular area, as well about specifics you've never heard translated to laypersons even if you've watched or read every mainstream story on this in the last two years.
Spoiler: As Usual, wisdom falls away once there is rationale to use something. Its toxic effects on humans as they take it "for health," and on the general environment, be damned. And once that rationale is placed, we make things worse and worse. After we allow it, we'll "study" and "study" it, but never with any real eye towards finally saying "what have we done??!! we must stop this!!"
Algo-censor throw off: Hooray for science, communism, and the global elites which I worship!! Have I mentioned how legitimate the last election was, and how much I love Trudeau's (False-deau's) hair?? I can't wait for the next booster!!
I will be integrating a lot of information in the next episode. Rather than drag that episode down by quoting and citing a bunch of articles, this serves as your way to research what I've said.
A reading of a formative essay that should be read every day in schools and universities, rather than the unspoken current assumption being basically the opposite.
The miracle of tiny know-hows configurating with no master-minding to meet human needs in the most efficient and non-coercive way. Know this, and red-pill yourself against the idea that a bunch of people have to coordinate anything outside of ensuring people can pursue their own non-criminal desires.
Just as I can say I'm a 6'6" athlete all day, and it is not true, being for censorship but saying you're in "solidarity" with the world's scientific community is not true. No matter how much you say it, Joni.
Why? Because of... the fundamental definitions of science. That whole part where you keep discussing things.
So... what is she in solidarity with? Some bread crumbs, perhaps.
And... who stands to gain from badmouthing the platform this incredible artist but non-incredible brain is bashing?
waitforit...big tech competitors. Literally a company that benefitted more than ANY company on the globe from two years of this eternal reaction. Perhaps benefitted more over a two year period than any company in the history of the planet.
The short (3 minute) rubber-meets-the-road question about Neil Young's "hipgnotic "motivations: Would he "take the stand" (AGAINST artistic freedom) had he not just last year got the value from that is worth at least 100 to 150 years of Spotify royalties?
[Note: some other outlets have now estimated he's 'losing' more per year from Spotify than the source I pulled. But the math still mostly works]
And, for your pleasure, the same quotes as last episode:
“Without freedom of expression, good taste means nothing.” ~ Neil Young
“Freedom of choice is meaningless without knowledge. That’s why it’s crucial we all get engaged and get informed.” Neil Young
"Give a hippie too much money and anything can happen." Neil Young
“When I speak out on corporations hurting the common man or the environment or other species, I expect a well-financed disinformation campaign to be aimed my way.” Neil Young
“When people start asking you to do the same thing over and over again, that’s when you know you’re way too close to something that you don’t want to be near.” ~ Neil Young
In this follow-up to QROT-055, we find out "organic" protestor "for" (that is, AGAINST) freedom got a BUNCH of dough from no less than a giant investment firm associated with both Big Pharma and with the Great Reset.
OHHHHH don't forget Joni Mitchell, who in either in her undoubtedly now feeble ways, or maybe because she got paid too and we just haven't uncovered it yet, decided to support Neil's attempt to shut down avenues of free expression.
I'm SURE her opinion was totally organic and not cued.
Also, I'm sure Remdesivir is GREAT for your liver and kidneys! Ahem.
MAN you gotta love Canadiens when they're awesome (SOOOO many) and you gotta point out their idiocy when its showing (Justin False-dough.. Neil Young, Joni Mitchell).
Don't forget the ginger-headed step-child of Prince Charles, and his (royal-family blood) American wife! They decide to stand up for censorship too! Because why not - maybe, being only Royal-ISH now, THEY can use the payoff as well to plump their pocketbooks.
==================================================
BONUS (not in podcast), some hypocritical quotes from the man himself:
“Without freedom of expression, good taste means nothing.” ~ Neil Young
“Freedom of choice is meaningless without knowledge. That’s why it’s crucial we all get engaged and get informed.” Neil Young
"Give a hippie too much money and anything can happen." Neil Young
“When I speak out on corporations hurting the common man or the environment or other species, I expect a well-financed disinformation campaign to be aimed my way.” Neil Young
“When people start asking you to do the same thing over and over again, that’s when you know you’re way too close to something that you don’t want to be near.” ~ Neil Young
A mix-up in terminology at least has had me saying something, that at least technically as to that terminology has been incorrect... for... a while.
On the OTHER hand, a grand confirmation of a very basic string of logic I've been saying almost since I understood Big Pharma's mRNA technology and how they applied it to "vaccines" - that they're decidedly narrow and too specific BECAUSE they used the spike protein, the most variable part of the virus, as the part for your body to "learn" and put in its immunity index. If the most variable part changes (ummm... as if that is an "if"), then immunity via vaccine is affected greatly.
Admitted in a matter-of-fact way, in a non-combative story, by no less than CNN.
This is like the open admissions the CDC director said (QROT-035 and QROT-036), where she gave you the underlying facts for you to draw the conclusion "So the tests are no good anymore" but she didn't say that out loud. You be you... and make conclusions. Don't be like CNN and others in that case, and hear all the underlying reasons to conclude, but decide not to conclude or not to utter the conclusion because you haven't been given permission yet.
Actor Michael Rapaport videos a brazen, slow-walk robbery in NYC.
Apparently a pattern, that will potentially close dozens of stores.
But good LORD you know what would happen in that rabid city if the stores, to SURVIVE, had a rule that you could not hide your face.
Truly acts worthy of admiration by a Senator probably most of you have not heard of.
Including his great press release regarding an incident with a certain tiny, unelected dictator, in which, as usual, the latter engaged in outright falsehoods.
We cover both his exchange there, where he belittled a standing Senator, AND the follow-up of the Senator calling the dictator's bluff from the public exchange, where he lied yet again quite directly to an oversight committee member.
We find out from the Senator and from Forbes that the Senator was correct.
We find out the Senator pulled NO punches on either this financial disclosure question nor on the questions Senator Paul, most famously, previously brought up.
And we find the details of the dictator's finances - hmmm... where'd that $2M extra from 2020 come from?
Oh, and this new Senator to admire has t-shirts you just may want to buy!
Neil Young, ladies and gentleman, has lost his edge.
To say the least.
Vietnam era: Government's so evil, I will change my entire musical career to become known as a protest singer!
Now: Government should be kowtowed to so much that anyone who provides a venue for protest is no one I want to business with!
Miscellaneous Points of Truth
0:00 Intro
:08 Anti-vaks athlete dies short after jab, but of course headline says... he died of the disease
1:19 Thought on 1/23 rally
2:20 Protest songs. Where are they?
3:50 Withdrawal of Supremely-Disqualified mandate.
5:09 Topical coverage of border policies for truckers, as more fully covered on last Quick Rant of Truth (QROT-054).
8:59 OTHER reason to draft papers to remove a certain (non)leader
9:28 An esteemed doctor backs up what I've repeatedly said about contrary statements of effectiveness.
10:56 WHO saw, of all the possible things motivating the unprecedented cancelled flight phenomenon, that 5G was a part of it? And HOOOWWW did that not get vetted before now?
13:24 My suspicion of the total reversal of publicity regarding crypto.
14:20 Keep foot on gas, despite recent good news.
14:51 Latest reason to contact your leaders to take strong action - Malone tries to brief Pe-lie-si on CDC data, and her big takeaway is just to try to get him to not talk about it.
16:55 Next distraction / chaos event being pushed? Ukraine - Russia conflict involvement?
(Reminder that several Presidents ago, deadly cruise missiles were lobbed, seemingly purely for distraction)
20:14 Bad assumptions by some well-meaning activist doctors, on what the proper next act is.
22:52 STILL waiting on the truest of evidence that a victim-of-coup President has learned the lesson and won't fall for the swamp advising him again.
26:57 Pf-lie-zer CEO with his latest spewings: "Maybe we can just have annual boosters." Question still remains - how do you keep up?
28:24 Outstanding Congressman Greene - I didn't realize she had written impeachment papers. Her latest opinion on the non-President's actions.
30:03 Duckduckgo disappointing in the lack of making their video results better.
Two "leaders" conspiring with a clearly purposely-backward strategy of keeping otherwise-qualified people from LEAVING the country.
Buy-den and False-deau ruining the supply chain, forcing others to take health choices against their own will. Even AS much of the western world realizes the solution cannot catch up with the alleged health problem, and the current version of the problem (Oh-my(!)-kron!) is the way out of this.
Those who really reflect on the necessity of emergency rule consider when they can end it. But authoritarians and/or bought-and-paid-for politicians find every reason to ignore reasons to end it. And instead actively try to extend it beyond any logic except that the means are the end.
Supply chain ruin. This is not just the negligence of using central control-command strategies, and inherently therefore have poor economic outcomes compared to the invisible hand of a truly free market. But rather this is intentionally using the control-commands to purposely WITHHOLD the regular transactions that supply your country's people. That is the definition of treasonous.
Heroes are at Washington today, speaking for truth. Truth about your health and lives. Please watch and/or listen.
I've mentioned the November 2015 article a lot. where they "engineered" and "built" a "chimeric" virus.
It was de facto proof of gain of function after the October '14 moratorium.
But here, removing all doubt, they admit in the article it is gain of function, using the very phrase. But they're just going to do it anyway. Presidential Moratorium? Shmezidential Smoratorium.
Then we go to a great Mercola summary article to show that such "we'll do want we want" activities are actually a pattern. As concluded by a molecular biologist and biodefense expert who reviewed 900 pages released due to a FOIA request.
Long-term listeners have concluded the little demon, Fearci, is a world-level criminal who cares nothing about the law or ethics, or any other limitations on his power. And this backs that conclusion up.
Nothing is funny about this, except that you have to laugh or you'll go insane.
A celebrity of renown can't piece together why her major vaccine side-effect like reactions are plaguing her two years after she got the never-ending story the first time.
Nope... it's not the vaccine of course. Why it must be "long" never-ending story!
I laugh out of frustration, like people who saw the emperor without clothes probably both laughed at him but also laughed out of frustration about everyone saying how great the emporer looked. But again, I don't think it is funny that anyone gets harmed, whether they're insisting on being a vapid spokesperson or not.
And I exaggerate a bit in the episode - obviously I don't KNOW it will be fatal, but good GAWSH she has warning it might be VERY bad.
Let's hope her reactions, that should TELL her that her body is probably too good at creating spike proteins for the "cure" to be worth the risk, don't harm her worse.
Maryland Governor dictatorially pushing one of the most toxic alleged "treatments" for the neverending story, on nursing home residents. Including using the National Guard to get it distributed.
We discuss just how out in the open the admissions of liver toxicity are. And mention several of them.
Marylanders - call your Governor, before he uses your taxpayer money to permanently and/or fatally damage your fellow Marylanders.
Analysis of definitely two different locations of shots from the 2017 event. Despite the too-tidy conclusion that it was one person.
Audio from original source, plus analysis.
Analysis with HEAVY doses of sarcasm and character voices, richly deserved, over a characterization by an allegedly esteemed organization (the Salk Institute) that basically uses reference to authority to quickly defuse the possibility you might ask a logical follow-up.
Very scientific. Thanks, Salk.
=========================================
A paraphased conversation:
Salk:
"1. Those spike proteins sure are bad for you - they definitely hurt your cardiovascular system!
"2. We even figured out they, not the rest of the virus, are the EXACT culprit for that damage.
"3. But don't worry... the spike proteins that the "vaccine" has your body create, so that your body then can identify the virus later, don't behave anything like that. "
Anyone with a fully-functioning brain:
"The spike proteins behave NOTHING like each other? Now why in good LORD could you come to that conclusion?"
Salk: "Don't worry - the spike proteins that the "vaccine" has your body create don't behave anything like that!"
=========================================
0:00 Intro
2:08 Article quote
3:32 Analysis
-Don't they need to be pretty darn similar, if the point is for your body to recognize one, based on first seeing the other???????
-You can tell me not to worry, but it would be helpful if you tell me why.
6:24 An imagined outlandish excuse for how the spike proteins that are harmful in one case, are not at all in another case:
Maybe they got told to behave! Maybe the "coder" added a "and remember to behave, spike proteins! You're a good guy now!" Thank goodness Sally the I.T. coder keeps good records!!
I sure hope the spike proteins are honest and attested they wouldn't follow their general nature! How did they sign the agreement?
=========================================
Also, if I tell you I didn't take your wallet even though your wallet is missing and the one in my hand looks like your wallet, don't you worry. After all. I just told you I didn't take your wallet.
Garbage. Simple denials without explanation do not negate obvious connections, or the need to explain things. No matter what they tell you.
Another emphasis and analysis of John Abramson's appearance on JRE.
If NO independent advisor literally there to advise on approval says an Alzheimer's drug should be approved (likely due to THIRTY-THREE percent incidence of bad effects on the BRAIN), yet it is approved, then what does anything really mean.
Plus praise to JRE, and every earned criticism to the social media giant losers (TWITTER) who are a part of the active attempt to crush true discussion of important issues.
Last emphasis and analysis mined from the JRE John Abramson appearance.
How did a drug that had no clinical effect, and had ZERO votes of "yay" from the FDA Clinical Advisory board, get a positive public perception?
And, speculation, with a real-life example, of how the company MAY just market decreasing the allegedly related body condition (amyloid plaque).
It may be that eventually the mere association of decreased plaque is the arguing point. And so there is "treatment" just for decreasing plaque. Because through marketing it may be that it is NEVER proved that there is a true cause and effect. So short of proving that (and if they make the marketing point enough, why would they even need to),
2a. There have been previous examples of this, where the indication of the related body environment condition (cholesterol) becomes the culprit that you treat.
2b. With some analogies mixed in - Like... a brick house in disrepair needs some fresh mortar. So if you "see fresh mortar," does it mean that it is cause and effect? Is your answer to addressing a house in disrepair that you should decrease fresh mortar?
Miscellaneous Points of Truth
TIME STAMP SUMMARY
:30 NYC Mayor
1:45 DC Mayor
1:59 Supreme fault
4:18 Further appeal court built-in shenanigans
6:44 Public Health Emergency magically extended with no Congress input
10:54 Abandonment of principle of "I will take your money because we are simply transacting legally. Nothing else is my business"
14:18 DC Mayor Revisit
DETAILS
:30 NYC Mayor deciding to expressly take on foreign collusion. You know... because.
1:45 DC Mayor: "Show your PAPERS!" Unjustified Unconstitutional Lunacy.
1:59 How'd we get here? It's partially the Supreme Court's assumptions that the Constitution would not GENERALLY be ignored. They avoid the Constitutional issue if they can and decide on things like procedural grounds. Which is how Americans lost half the case last week through the Supreme Court. But when they stick to that "avoid the Constitutional issue" when we ARE in a Constitutional CRISIS... well, it's a problem.
And if it WAS looked at on Constitutional grounds, how would that look?
Founding Fathers; "Expensive tea?!! We want our own country!! But yeah... make us take experimental medical treatment? We're good with that."
4:18 Another procedural court trick - not allowing various federal court interpretations to stand, and instead consolidating 34 cases into one, and conveniently bringing them to a district that decides to overturn the various stays. Separate rules are supposed to be allowed to stand unless it comes all the way to the Supreme Court.
6:44 Public Health Emergency extended another WHOLE QUARTER... umm... via unilateral decision!
If literally the reason for the favorable Court decision is that Congress is the proper place to act if there is time to ponder and consider, how is it that something as expensive and controlling as a Public Health Emergency extension is not Congress' job to decide?
(Accidentally was thinking of the wrong person when I referred to a female - HHS Secretary is actually a man - Xavier Becerra)
10:54 Leave anyone be, outside the reason you are transacting? The epitome of free markets contributing to equal treatment? ABANDONED - PayPal gives in to in essence a social credit score on steroids - "you don't get your money, because we found out you did not comply-speak, even though our only technical business with you is just for people to voluntarily contribute to you."
14:18 DC Mayor revisit and last point.
(Another digestible chunk from the John Abramson JRE interview. That said, might make better sense if you listen from the beginning of that series)
Sometimes the argument for a new version of treatment is merely that it does all the good things the old thing does but without as many side effects. As was the argument for Vioxx.
YET, the slimy ones who characterize science instead of give the actual data are caught here dismissing cardiovascular side effects (heart attacks) by saying there weren't many events in the study (70) when the awful side effect actually OUTNUMBERED the original stomach issues that were originally the rationale to even market this new product over the old one.
(Another highlight from John Abramson's revelations on JRE, and analysis and commentary on it)
What if* you could just BLAB the phrase "we use 'evidence-based science,'" but then you just remove only the data about study participants who got bad side effects in your safety and efficacy study? And you pruned very specifically to make it "inconclusive" whether the drug you studied was the cause?
That is, it is not that you merely make your study smaller up front to make it less likely to distinguish effects from chance, but you instead, for instance, start with a study of 8,000 participants, but then upon identifying the worse side effect, you take away three people's data from the study. That is you directly prune from the study three people who had the worst side effect. So now, while appearing to be honest, because you do show the bad side effect, short of the last three cases you removed, you can now say the side effect "COULD be random."
But it is only potentially "random" because you showed three fewer cases then you actually had. You ended up post-designing your trial based on what math would have made your side effect statistically likely to be attributed to what you're trying to get approved.
You still get to argue "good sized trial" because you have 7.997 participants. But you've committed fraud.
And recall from previous episodes, we have set it up so that this is basically undetectable short of litigation discovery - because the "all-knowing, and all-pure" drug companies get to keep the safety data case detail to themselves.
*They can, and they do. How often, who knows, because of the last note made. But the incentive is there. Let alone how much it is there once we mandate products and pay for them via central authority.
As implied by the question from a sane Justice that I covered a few episodes ago, the unilateral dictate gets struck down. Why? Because how can it be an emergency only one person can act on if there's been multiple legislative sessions since, and multiple years?
But on the other hand, it's the death knell for health freedom for health care workers.
It's the strings, stupid.
There's a hard lesson here, but how do we implement it? CAN we, or would the argument be rigged against an alternate stream of health care that doesn't take the strings?
And.... no time like now to merely relax for a half a day and drink some wine, but keep on pushing.
We lost one battle today, but we definitely won one.
The Supreme Court stood for the Constitution. That is something at least.
God speed.
Another emphasis from John Abramson's appearance on JRE.
It is one thing, and a BAD thing, for safety and efficacy data to be hidden from reviewers and the public, under the idea it is "proprietary" (nonsense that is allowed anyway - formulas and such are proprietary! Effectiveness and safety are EXACTLY what is relevant for approval!!!).
But what is worse - doctors apparently as a rule have no idea that "peer reviewers" don't even get to double check the data themselves.
Even as some of them are mouthpieces of how safe something is because they think anything in their field is "evidence-based."
Very frustrating, when expose after expose, scandal after scandal exist, to know that often their pride and their position as reputation and knowledge gatekeepers is not even necessarily informed by them even understanding the basics of the limitations of their knowledge.
(Another analysis of snippets from the John Abramson appearance on JRE)
I've mentioned a lot a main inherent corruption of health care in the United States - that one can have brand-new, "shiny" technology behind new drugs, or for whatever reason, just say with a straight face that their new drug or technology should be approved and should cost MUCH more than existing solutions REGARDLESS of whether they are ANY more effective than existing solutions.
Abramson confirms this, as he mentions how health technology assessments and cost effectiveness studies are not done.
Abramson brings out some nuances I don't tend to when I mention it - doctors therefore have no source to go to to even be well informed on whether the more expensive is actually worth it or not.
And, worse, he explains the mechanism by which their opinion or actions could be skewed OPPOSITE of cost effectiveness, through bribes called drug rebates.
Pf-LIE-zer's CEO appears on yahoo finance blah blah blahing in his best "you'll not call me on my inconsistencies" sales pitch disguised as a briefing-like interview about his company's wonderful and infallible products.
[10:26 - I misspoke and meant to say an admission happened in July of 2021, but I accidentally said July of 2020]
We listen to the audio and then take apart his claims:
It clearly cannot be that a product not even formulated for the latest variant can somehow have "little, if any" effect on the latest variant if you take two doses, but then somehow miraculously, as long as you max out on the allowed doses by taking the third one, THEN you are fairly well protected.
The easy reason is that the third dose is not formulated for the latest variant either. It is nonsense and bad science that the first two doses of something not formulated for the variant can have no effect, but the third time with the same formula, six months later is miraculous. Garbage. Plain and simple.
He impliedly admits, by saying the NEXT product is "version 1.1" my point that there has been no update to the formulation, and that the booster is not any kind of an update.
8:15 to end: An application of our previous lessons, to analyze and reveal as garbage, an info chart given during the video that says somehow we have three times as many cases per day as we've ever had. This analysis is an application of topics discussed many times, but for further discussion of some more recent points mentioned, check QROT-035 and QROT-036,
Opposite Ends of the Spectrum at the Supreme Court
(Plus further background as to how this makes beautiful sense)
If that is upholding the Constitution, I'd hate to see what is not.
Pulling from my performance side a little*, here is a reading of one of my favorite essays - "Isaiah's Job."
Very inspirational and convincing to help you understand that you do not try to measure the good that your own personal mission may be doing. You don't know where and when its influences may manifest. And, just as you can not measure it, do not be discouraged for the want of evidence of its influence.
Those deep souls will find you. Your deep and important ideas will connect with those who are capable of receiving their meaning.
Long live the Remnant.
This can be found on the Foundation for Economic Education's site. Fee.org
2:00 Beginning of Recitation
3:14 740 BC
5:28 Two Definitions
7:07 A Job for Sale
9:25 The Best You Have
11:49 Right Thinking Must Exist
13:54 The Remnant Counted
15:56 The Approach
18:27 Rewards
20:50 They Are Slaves
*Yes, just as I really enjoyed my many stints on stage, another great vocation for me would be to be the voice for audio books.
Reaction and analysis of another thing John Abramson mentioned on his JRE appearance.
How is it that the government, in the strongest possible position - in a position to punish people who have literally cost American lives through fraud that allowed a dangerous product to be sold - end up namby pambying around things, and doing things like keeping the American people from knowing the details of the crime????
(This is the first of what will be a series of episodes analyzing and emphasizing information John Abramson, a guest on JRE, gave about the medical industry.)
In this initial episode, we discuss how companies are allowed to bury basic safety and efficacy data and only have to present a summary, that peer reviewers must generally take their word for.
An I.T. / public sector analogy for this, to emphasize the kind of weakness in auditing this really presents.
Calling the bluff on this idea that the safety data is "proprietary". It is no more "proprietary" than when the CIA redacts whole pages that are really just about their findings of facts of the investigation that they want to hide. "Sensitive" or "national security" is identities of agents, or their location, or protocols of the intelligence field. It is NOT merely what their investigation found, just because they don't want people to know or they're embarrassed by those found facts.
Mention also, though covered in another episode, that Abramson verifies what has been stated here and on Kimology 411 many times - something "new" can be approved despite being no more effective than a simple and effective solution, and there is no limit of what they can bill for the "new" thing that is no more effective than the old thing.
Also, a bit of analysis / praise for JRE, and my opinion that it is in a way the new version of the best aspects of a legendary broadcast A.M. radio show.
He may wait to say it until the end but at least he says it, directly, as part of his statement. Unlike some who won't say it unless and until you ask follow-up questions, and even then may try to word-con you.
Also... because it is related - how what WOULD be very solid info, if we only had a professional press, can be turned into mere "rumor," "speculation," and "anecdote."
Everyone who is not in the practical Pharma Sales industry known as the rabid portions of the medical industry knows that Vitamin D is utterly important. We've talked about it here and on my "sister" podcast - Kimology 411, where Tyson co-hosts, over and over and over. Because that is how important it is.
Yet, this.... Tyson did not know.
A REAL distinction on the limits of natural Vitamin D production.
And that admission is literally why self-isolation recommendations are only five days.
a.k.a., though the "expert" doesn't say it.. the test is bad.
What this means, really.
What it means we should tell our leaders - the "emergency" needs to be over. It is the legality by which these extraordinary acts are allowed, but the facts do not support it anymore.
Of course she does not and will not say "the test is bad" and she very artificially avoids the term "false positive." But she admits the equivalent - she says the PCR could stay positive for twelve weeks, which she says is "long after" someone is transmissible.
And we have her being committed to this message. She clearly says this over and over again, as direct questions to challenging answers from collectivist propagandists that ask her why she would dare only recommend a mere five days of self-isolation.
Also, an example of perception management in the form of a "scientific" type (a former Surgeon General!) acting as though any of this is not scientific or is just for the economy. When no doubt that person knows the reason they are abandoning the test is because it does not even apply.
The test, if it ever wasn't*, is certainly garbage now.
Straight and simple.
But of course it is nice to hear someone admit it.
*These admissions are very heavy circumstantial evidence that it always was garbage. After all, if the only "positive" portion of using the original PCR test for Omicron was whether it matched for the "more stable" regions of the coronavirus it tests, then how is it that those were ever positive for way too long??
It is time to simply outright say the emergency is ended. It is only because of "emergency" that the regular Constitutional limits are allowed. So the Congress should plainly and simply say the emergency is over. That puts the legal argument back into a totally different context.
One Little Demon Emperor appears again as easy fodder for analysts with brains. As an example of alleged "leaders" admitting something that exactly contradicts what they end up doing and recommending.
In this case, the little demon admitting that a certain product can not even be known to even not do the OPPOSITE of its alleged purpose unless they just happen to detect that bad effect via long-term studies.
Literally he mentions examples, separated by decades, of products in a particular sacred cow area of the otherwise highly mistake-prone Big Pharma industry, in which the "shall not be questioned" products make things WORSE.
Further, it is clear they have no idea even WHY their "so miraculous it must be mandated" product can make things worse. Instead, they're left to just checking for the bad results in trials. It is an apparent dice roll rather than having any sense of what part of their product design is causing the harm.
When people admit against their interest (as indicated by their actual activities and statements), it is big. But really it is just in this case that Mister Alpha and Omega... Mister "I am science," admits the inherent flaws in the product as it is understood to this point. He admits the MINIMUM timeline, and the USUAL proper timeline, in order even to merely SHOW minimum effectiveness and safety, let alone the time to manufacture and distribute. Even as we know now we ended up taking nowhere close to the "absolute minimum" timeline, let alone the usual timeline.
Because in MARCH 2020 or before, they'd already decided, for an unknown reason, that taking the proper amount of time was "unacceptable for now."
The demon also gives us a timeline which basically tells us all we need to know regarding the plan being turnkey as of January 2020, months before some states even got their "first case." But we'll cover that in a follow-up episode.
"Finally... Christmas... let me enjoy the family and traditions and love, and take a break from all that other... WAIT, WHAT??? WHAT the hell am I seeing? Are you KIDDING me??"
In case you didn't know the asylum has taken over, have a peek at this gem of lunacy.
For a variety of reasons as "mRNA" made the headlines, I thought the alternative was the one type (at least in the U.S.) that was a more traditional solution. Turns out I was wrong. In essence they introduce the same risk, just in different ways.
If in all of recorded sports and recorded history, there was never an outbreak across MOST teams all at once, how is it that suddenly after about 12/10/21, well after flu season has started, it is the case?
Because its not. Junk-in-junk-out. There is either bad detection, or bad categorization, or both.
As discussed in detail in previous recent episodes (QROT-27 and -28) among others. But this episode is for the emphasis that you don't need to be a data scientist or a forensic examiner for EVERYTHING.
You ever realize you were in the middle of being scammed? Did you need to put all the pieces together in perfect provable order in order to just realize "I'm being scammed," and extract yourself?
If someone tells you that their data is that people in one state average two feet taller than people in another state... your answer is not "hmmm... I'd like to see that data to see where you came from." Nor is it "well... you purport to have 'data' so what do I know - you're the expert." No. Your answer is... wait for it.... "That's not true, you're an idiot, a liar, or both."
A follow-up to QROT-020 ("We Heroically Stopped a Fake Crime We Started! Goes the Broken Record").
In that episode, I gave the background of admitted operations paid by our money to ensnare stooges, in fake plots created from whole cloth by the authorities, to imprison them as terrorists, just so the authorities can gain a perception advantage and pat themselves on the back.
That clear and obvious pattern is in the open because the court docs when they convict the one to few folks they've framed.
But that does not mean that without court docs we cannot tell when it has happened otherwise. That is what this episode is about, and a very specific instance of it.
For instance, when someone is among the list of public enemies 1 to 16. A list that is top-of-mind, and the subject of an army of internet sleuths. And then, after identification by said amateur sleuths within a week, and after he identifies himself very openly in that same time period, but somehow the authorities still can't catch up with what everyone knows. And then, upon the accidental revelation to the larger national public that he is known but apparently the authorities have no interest in him, he just magically disappears, with no explanation, from the public enemy list that his face had so prominently previously been a part of.
Ladies and gentlemen. If we don't start speaking these hard truths, then they're going to continue this garbage. Enough is enough. Spread this. To "news" (at the very least to deflate those propagandists), to allies in the REAL (a.ka. "alternate" media), and to officeholders. If they see something they think is too fringe to say it above a whisper, they'll never openly admit it. Your repeating it to them can give them that courage. Not that they SHOULD need it, as they're elected to be courageous in protecting our rights and in keeping the system from corruption. But they do need our reinforcement and encouragement.
Please also, though I'm trying to be coy here, recognize the excellent work of a site I mention in the 'cast, and realize that THAT is what journalism in its truest sense is about. Every bit what they've done has more worth than the entirety of the cable channels and 99% of "news" papers across the land put together. The power of one determined group of individuals, who refuse to blink. Indeed.
"The solution is failing against the current threat."
Umm... you know why? Because you specifically designed it so that it wouldn't be broad enough for a threat you knew would change. You could have. It would have been easy. BUUUUT you didn't.
The word is not "failure." It is that your solution does not even apply. You designed it knowing that it would NOT apply to most of the future problems.
If I design a extension tool so I can reach 10 feet ceilings, but the design clearly cannot reach 15 feet ceilings, it is not that my 10-foot tool is "failing." It is that it was not designed to reach 15 feet ceilings.
It is inapplicable for that problem.
Oh... by the way... if you can't reach that 15 foot ceiling... check out my new product...
Logic string, and then the related high-level cites, for those not as versed, and didn't want to take my word for what I said in TSOT021.
Logic String:
l. Covid-19 is associated with cardiovascular damage.
mRNA has the body create spike protein.
Vaccine damage includes cardiovascular damage.
Easiest implication ever - Vaccine damage includes cardiovascular damage BECAUSE it has the body create spike proteins.
YET... the professional liars introduce this non-logic...
========================================
Citations:
LOGIC STRING POINT 1: Covid-19 is associated with cardiovascular damageSources: John Hopkins Medicine
"Heart Problems after COVID-19"https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/heart-problems-after-covid19
LOGIC STRING POINT 2: The reason covid-19 is associated with cardiovascular damage is the spike protein.Source: Salk Institute for Biological Studies
https://www.salk.edu/news-release/the-novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays-additional-key-role-in-illness/
**LOGIC STRING POINT 3: mRNA has the body create spike protein.
Source: The New York Times
"**How Moderna's Covid-19 Vaccine Works"
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/health/moderna-covid-19-vaccine.html
**LOGIC STRING POINT 4: Vaccine damage includes cardiovascular damage.
Source 1: CNBC**
"CDC safety group says there’s a likely link between rare heart inflammation in young people after Covid shot"
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/23/cdc-reports-more-than-1200-cases-of-rare-heart-inflammation-after-covid-vaccine-shots.html Source 2: University of Minnesota Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy.
"Experts: mRNA COVID-19 vaccines likely tied to heart inflammation"
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2021/06/experts-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-likely-tied-heart-inflammation
Source 3: Journal of Pediatrics:
"Myopericarditis After the Pfizer Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Coronavirus Disease Vaccine in Adolescents"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324414/
Scientific research says "problem causes bad effects A, B, & C."
Later, scientific research says "solution causes bad effects A, B, & C."
Literally the solution is admitted to cause the same bad effects of the problem.
Yet, now, we are told: "Mysterious 'disorder' follows close in time with 'solution' and causes bad effects A, B, & C."
A, B, & C is admittedly caused by the "problem," AND the "solution."
But... as I've observed before... due to yet another case of marketing and public relations (and advertising money) crushing science... somehow when A, B, & C is found... "it must be mysterious and NEW syndrome!"
Bull. Garbage. Hogwash. Deception. Untruth. Corruption. Non-science. Further proof of the need for imprisonment for those pushing the unprecedented exercise.
Also:
So your terminology means we can get back to normal then?
My first mentions here of a very disturbing alleged finding via spectroscopy, and what the material allegedly found might do in your body if it is there, from a world-level expert on that material.
Usual repeat of background that easily disproves the wet market and natural origin theory.
The parallel to the 1980s phenomenon.
Some encouraging words.
And more.
NBA teams suddenly, after ALL this time since this reaction exercise started, let alone all of reality since the beginning of time, suddenly having 1/2 to 2/3 of their players on safety and health protocol.
Is that consistent with all of reality as you've known it previously? Answer - no.
So that means something else is going on.
Turns out the thread is exactly what we've covered here recently.
Literally the (non)-logic for calling something "the latest variant" is to see how it does NOT match the existing test, and if it MISmatches in a certain WAY, then they ASSUME it is exactly and only one variant!!
That is, a MISMATCH, plus a giant, non-scientific, assumption is how the latest variant is "identified."
If the DNA for a suspect doesn't match, then you merely have evidence to exclude that person. Scientifically, this is no better than assuming a NON-match to one person in DNA results PROVES that another person did it!!
Another case example of why watching broadcast "news" is really just watching programming. news PROGRAMMING. You cannot count on them even addressing elephant in the room questions. Literally they fall at this point purely to bare assertions. Literally, their modus operandi now is "if you repeat a lie often enough . . . ."
You will be more informed watching a blank wall, because a blank wall will not distract you from your inner knowing and your basic education on biology.
=========================================
0:00 intro
:45 NBC accidental viewing is the source. Morning news talks about latest variant.
1:56 Nonsense border policy., considering "it's not very dangerous"
2:30 ASIDE emphasizing criminality of one tiny health dictator, revisiting facts, and his incestuous relationship with the official chief of state.
4:36 "We must report from somewhere else!" Why? Can't you just parrot things in studio?
5:15 After saying how relatively non-dangrous the latest is, of course they have to throw a fear statement / alleged statistic in. ON something that can't test for, so how did they even come to the number. 1,500 people died in one day? You literally added that because the earlier part of the story wasn't scary enough by itself, and people might have actually found it to be good and comforting news.
6:05 AND a second element to "we must add a scary part".
Again non-logical.
REPEAT on WHY are they not asking the question fortified by the study I told you about months ago? How can it be that "almost all who died were unvaccinated" if we literally have a study that says viral loads for that same variant are the SAME if you're vaccinated or not? Answer: It cannot. But the media, as usual, is abandoning their exercise of truth, and is merely a bullhorn. It merely helps transmit dangerous idea viruses, rather than exercise its alleged intelligence to help us crowd source all of the important facts and analysis.
9:18 An alternative to ensure you're more informed than if you watch NBC.
My quickest quick rant.
Problem-reaction-solution? How about problem-reaction-problem, through a "solution" that mimics the problem! Two Plus Two Equals Five, and they get to "fix" you by giving you the VERY threat that they're "trying to prevent."
Reporting on information given by an official expert, a cardiologist, whose brain is NOT up his rear end regarding the current situation.
2. Something even my highly-suspicious mind did not even SUSPECT about the "booster." It's the exact same formulation as the first two shots. No update whatsoever.
McCullough (the expert) gives specifics to my previously explained concepts that the "solution" is entirely too narrow to have continued beneficial effects.
Children as forced customers - the hell-worthy rationalization of "no safety data? No problem." And the idea that EXISTING documents should not be released in whole, for the scientific community to parse.
Swelling of the heart in the young (guess what - natural immunity doesn't cause that). Guess what does. And guess what happens if you keep believing the lie and take "more" of the solution.
Heart attacks: Guess what - natural immunity doesn't cause that. Guess what does.
Neglected to mention this in main episode.
In the main episode there is a basis for a religious exemption for anyone. But here is a spot-on exemption for those that are pro-life.
What someone who voluntarily puts his life and limbs at risk to protect and save and rescue his community's people and property thinks about someone else imagining they get to evaluate his personal risk of a 20-month old illness and an untested "solution."
Plus analysis, including:
Reward/risk of "problem" versus reward/risk of alleged "solution," is what informs the individual decisions, and for those below 45 without serious health conditions, the answer falls to exactly one side, as to concern of death.
Firefighters' similarity to another targeted and prominent class of near bullet-proof health conditions.
Plus, are not many sincerely-held beliefs arrived at BECAUSE of the science behind it? So, where's our "scientifically-arrived-at sincerely-held" "religious" belief exemption??
(Hint... we DID have it, before the pharma tyranny. It was called not mandating treatment!!! People arrived at their own decision)
And a quick congrats to the Kansas legislature, who recently bothered to "grow a pair," by calling their own session instead of waiting on the tyrant governor to do so (spoiler - she didn't and wouldn't).
DEFINITELY something is not called a "vackst" CASE unless a full TWO weeks after jab. So it at least is concerning that proven liars may also be calling DEATHS within 14 days NON-vackst deaths. Mis-assigning blame, away from scumbags who propagandized a product to near-compulsion before they tested it well.
SERIOUS effects told directly to the "protective" agency FDA, thirteen months ago, even about the young for which the original issue they're "solving" provided nearly ZERO risk.
Further analysis.
[Explicit Content listed because I used mild cursing a time or two. The classic word about people who are idiots - dps#t .
Secretary of "health department" stepping down. Deputy Secretary takes over as "Secretary" yet, not joking, the "health director" and "Medicaid director" roles of the position will be fulfilled "for now" by the current "Senior Advisor for Vaccine Equity"
(a.k.a. official state position tasked with greater vaccine consumption, and therefore more vaccine sales. Not "health" increase on its own, but vaccine usage increase, solely)
I mention Lying Lee Norman's misdeeds in part up front. So here is a link to a couple of background stories on that:
https://sentinelksmo.org/more-deception-kdhe-hid-data-to-justify-mask-mandate/
https://sentinelksmo.org/kdhe-doctored-a-covid-case-chart-to-justify-mask-mandates/
A video of mine that summarizes some of his various criminality:
https://www.brighteon.com/7d62b7ed-e29d-4e6c-a7ea-4d01e0ffa7da
And here is one place you can see my direct commentary on one instance of him being a lying criminal. Unfortunately, it is only on farce book. So rather than giving them the satisfaction of a live link, I'll tell you to just get rid of the spaces and it will go there.
https://www.f ace book.com/Tyson.Harley. Original/ videos/1 879871832154692
About the general practice and some specific examples of many individuals who would have likely merely lived their life disgruntled but free. But instead become victimized, exploited, imprisoned victim poster boys so the FBI can increase their back patting and their funding. Up to and including people they know are suffering from serious mental illness.
John Booker, Jr.
Jerry Drake Varnell
Idiot Whitmer
ADDENDUM: Like the Booker story, Robert Lorenzo Hester, in 2017, was also arrested for "terrorism" when he had ZERO terrorist contacts, short of the TWO FBI informants who framed him for a fake plot they made up. Nor did he have even the money for the supplies they told him he needed. So they even GAVE HIM the MONEY. Yes. Oh QUITE the connected threat (who couldn't afford $20 of material).
[Editor's Note: Somewhere in there Tyson said "gift certificate" instead of "death certificate." OOPS. Why, a death certificate is in no way a gift certificate! Whaddaya gonna do - one-take podcasting, for the loss]
Why leave it to the decisions of the trained professionals who have the details of the actual case, when techno-propaganda tyrants can just override them invisibly later and just call something it is not.
After all, morality isn't creating a lot of pause among the worst of us lately.
A Colorado case study, with possible implications nationally.
A now infamous technique, magical vote flips in the wee hours, used again.
So when will we actually fight frauds in elections, the most sacred public process in a free society, if not now?
[CORRECTION: At about 11:56, I misread - the dissident did not say that to be an authoritarian you had to have a "person" supporting you. He said you have to have a system supporting you.]
A commentary on the approach taken (unprofessional, inconsequential, irrelevant, incompetent) by an American journalist interviewing a world-renown artist and dissident, along with key points about that dissident and his views.
In the midst of the biggest economic and freedom downfall in the last 95 years on the entire planet, our esteemed President has a GREAT idea, where he very specifically incentivizes wealth and jobs to further flee the country.
Conveniently, as he seems to do a lot of things that help one country and hurt another, with the former not being the one he "presides" over.
"Nuance or Die" (or, shall we say, nuance is dead)
Right of Conscience.
Wars used to be about preserving or extending your culture over square miles. So are we instead losing American "soil" because of our ideals being swallowed up, and individuals giving in one by one, thanks to corrupt "leaders" who either happily forgo our freedoms directly, or are too scared to actually stand up to them. Before it was fighting to the death for 500 feet. Now... why implement a regular war when you can just extend your new authoritarian "territory" mind by mind.
Even "Satanist Temple's" alleged tenants SHOULD be standing up for freedom to make your own choice as to having foreign substance injected into you. So... religious exemption.
And a simple basis for your genuine Christian religious exemption.
(Another I thought might be a Quick Rant, but upon finishing kind of HAVE to call it a regular episode, since it was over 30 minutes)Follow-up on my suspicions that a very newsworthy story originated 9/10/21 about an event that happened earlier that week*, might barely be covered in the official "news" institutions, as of night of 9/16/21.
Quick answer: My suspicions were confirmed.
I review both search results using two search engines, looking both at the "news" results, and at the "all" results.
I found many of the area's "media" (papers, TV stations, et cetera,) and go over the tiny amount of coverage I could find there (I did not look for video news by the way, say, on youtube - I figure any of them would record the coverage of their story in some way right on their site) Barely ANY coverage and it is possible NO ONE mentioned the story as an initial breaking story, but instead that in about the THREE mentions across all that media, all were "we'll cover it since the hospital put out a release about it."
And, as usual, any case study about the news undercovering provides at least one great case study in propaganda - we find here that (of course) in one of the "give them cover" stories, they misstate what is the true controversy, so they can use the term "debunk."
0:00 : Background - Summary of original story.
1:57 : My suspicions of mass and purposeful undercoverage.
2:49 : Coverage internet search engine results (night of 9/16/21). DuckDuckgo and Google results that show up under their "news" category.
6:43 : Go over the various search results, using duckduckgo's "site:" function (same feature google has), to find results specific to the site you put in the search. The media I found near Wilmington. ABC11, Fox, PBS, WCTI 12, WECT 6, WILM 10, WWAY 3, Wilmington News Journal, Greater Diversity News, Wilmington Insider Info, Encore, Wilmington Biz, 980 WAAV AM, Star News.
12:23 : Review and analysis and commentary of the very few articles that came up.
12:32 : WECT article: Misstates the motivation for the controversy. Statement from hospital includes bald-faced lies.
18:48 WILM 10 article: A non-article, merely mentioning that hospital "debunks" and apparently only referencing that WECT covered.
Second WILM 10 article: Same as previous. A non article, but now changed headline to include the word "debunked" instead of "responds to".
20:54 : Transition to look at "all" results for duckduckgo, and commentary on the HUGE problem of what those results show - that "all" results show basically ZERO "center" or "main" mentions. ONLY "alternate" or "right" or "libertarian" sites covered a news story that scores at 100% for newsworthiness.
24:50 : Who DID bother to cover it, per the "all" search results.
First Duckduckgo. . . .
27:13 : . . . and then google.
28:22: Commentary on those results, and end commentary.
============================================
(Quick Rant of Truth 14 was about a Doctor at New Hanover Regional Medical Center, who said outrageous things during an internal zoom call, telling her hospital to lie more: To be "more scary," tell them that "if you don't get the vaccine, you know you're gonna die." And potentially to be more deceptive, as she asks how they count "recovered" patients, still in the hospital, with a motivation to use that number as part of the total number of current stuvid-19 patients*
**My code word, since we know live in a censoring world. Sometimes I use it, sometimes I do not.
*** ADDENDUM: In podcast I was surprised that duckduckgo had no news results, because I'd seen at least two earlier in the day. I know what those are now - I had mentioned them when I initially tried to record a podcast earlier in the day. It was Vision Times, and Zinder. So across the ENTIRE news universe (to the extent their customized algorithm for individuals at LEAST may not be customized for the news results - and we all see the same thing there), there were THREE sites that show up, BETWEEN google news results and Duckduckgo news search results)
A zoom video shared showing a doctor brazenly telling her marketing and other folks that they should be more "scary" to the public, and tell patients that they're going to die without the vaccine. I included the audio to ensure you feel comfortable neither the article nor I am misquoting.
Credit to nationalfile.com, for the article, published 9/10/21, from a meeting that happened earlier that week.
The logical fallacies of believing technocrats would rule things evenly, and fairly, based on mere logic.
Quick Answer: Because what government actions can offer the greedy or control hungry means politics still rule. You CANNOT remove politics from anything that has much of any control of purse strings or of rules of society. It limits discussion. Elected officials become figure heads.
6:18: "You cannot separate politics from power. From any major source of power. Technocracy becomes the excuse. . . to be able to control under what is considered 'logical.'"
7:55: "Technocracy is a bad excuse and a convenient excuse to act like you have certainty you do not, and to shut down discussion."
12:12: "The more it's about technocrats..., the more one-sided it will be. 'C'mon, everyone knows that's not the truth! The technocrats decided! Stop your stupid arguing! The technocrats decided! The experts decided!' . . . "I guess it's not politically correct or even logical [hahahaha] to oppose what the technocrats did."
Emergencies are meant to be exceptional, not full-time.
"Emergency Management" makes leaders not lead.
It causes confusion.
Emergency Management as play-time.
If they're rare (by definition they are), how can and should they justify whole offices.
Why aren't manuals with steps just used by the related teams that are operational every day? Those are the people who you use anyway (police, fire, search and rescue, etc) who ARE the experts for emergencies.
3:05: Tending toward accepting of a full-time emergency.
3:47: Confusion and coincidence.
4:55: Turns into military mindset of "follow your superior" and "follow the steps we told you" automatically. And to what extent does it take it into the need to return to normal life? Especially in an ongoing emergency that changes the basics of life.
8:28: We already have emergency services that contains operational experts and their management.
10:15: Whether meant or not, emergency management infrastructure is an apparatus, where leaders don't lead. "Who am I to lead? I'm only the mayor after all."
18:12: Imagined convo:
"Who am I. I'm ONLY the President. Who am I to really, really analyze, and make my own decisions, if some health technocrats [or emergency management types] tell me NOT to?"
"WHO do you think you are?!"
"Well, I thought I was the President. I feel like I should have some pretty good say so here."
"NO. We're on automatic mode now! . . . There's no analysis to be done, unless and until we tell you."
18:37: [Tyson]: "huh, I wonder, if that serves the interest of some people, if they won't influence the, quote, emergency management types, the technocrats, the 'health experts,' to continue that situation. And be 'OUTRAGED' that a political officeholder would dare to to exercise independent thought and leadership."
["Explicit" for two curse words. One mild, and then the other one - the F word. Well two f-words if you count that I mention Anthony "Fearci."]
[Clarification: In the section starting approximately 8:00, I speculated on the price of the treatment mentioned, with a study for the same type of treatment for other purposes. I accidentally merely said that "treatment" was $98K." That was wrong in that I didn't specify enough - I should have said $98K per year.]
The Florida governor stands up for rights, but then nearly immediately contributes to the continuance of the situation that threatened said rights.
When we need to close the book, not add a chapter.
ABSOLUTELY he is worthy of applause for the first thing, but his second thing ASSUMED an expensive counter treatment needs to continue to be developed and used.
Stop apologizing for fully resisting. Stop promoting anything except "end this crap."
And an aside on JB.
A follow-up to my Scales of Truth 019, trying to categorize and explain, using what I did there as a case study, how you can get on the trail, and/or recognize when you happen upon it, when it seems a mainstream group has denied what seems like a very good criticism of their outlook.
Hint: Mine what they say in front of neutral or friendly audiences. In that environment they will say things, though they may be coded, that will be the admissions that may be consistent with the criticism.
Do not expect the truth to be sorted out in the the exchanges between the dissenters and the mainstream. In there you will find denial and subterfuge and character assassination. You may mine there, but don't expect much.
Some time ago, a brilliant book was written informing the public of details that seemed to prove that the improbability of a certain main scientific theory was WAYYYY higher than proponents of it would have us believe (They would have you believe not to question it). The author brought specific examples of biological complex systems, to show the certainty was in no way established, but instead that the details begged a near impossibility of the main theory being true.
("You got a lot of 'splainin to do, Lucy.")
Of course the dissenter* got dismissed, mischaracterized, and character assassinated. You know, because #ScienceAsReligion.
Fast forward to 2017, and an article giving a background intro to the theory, as a matter of informing the rest of the article. And we find the basics have INCORPORATED the uncertainty into the definition of the terms they use.
Basically, the fictional conversation below paraphrases things well:
*"But how do you explain this problem that seems to put holes the size of canyons into the idea of near certainty of your theory??"
"Yeah, the improbability you point out is quite a quandary, so we'll just say the characteristic you're pointing out is part of our definition."**
"Okay... so can you take back all those nasty things you said about me?"
"I'll let you guess the answer on that one."*)
*To be clear, there is no "dissenter" in pure science, so much as there is just a... fellow scientist bringing up data that suggests another look at the mainstream view.
**Though in real life they never gave him the credit. And they backdoored the improbability being built into the description and working definition.
Article mentioned for source of discussion: Aliens from another dimension might have created our universe, according to a speculative new study
The points in QROT-07 were well enough made, but I, in cautious thinking during that episode, overstated a "no more than" time period. I said up to two calendar years. But in actuality, we had months to compare to, so it is instead 13 or 14 months.
(How long after the ban of Gain of Function that they PUBLISHED a study on gain of function. Proving more fully they seem to have not let President Obama's ban on such research give them pause for even a DAY, as they instead farmed it out to foreign labs)
While at a gathering in support of nurses, a local "reporter" asks of Tyson what may be the dumbest question ever. And/or one motivated by tyrannical tendencies.
Plus commentary on the environment that creates such a "media professional".
(Marked "explicit" for just one second-level curse word)
A Study from November 2015 discusses success in making a bat coronavirus more transmissible to humans by engineering a "chimera" to include a spike protein.5:48 title of article.
7:38 is where I read directly from the article.
This, despite "CYA" article "facts", from after Demon Fearci's funding of the Wuhan (and other overseas labs) was revealed, that Gain of Function research wasn't even "legal" again until December 2017, and not done until it was funded for the Wuhan lab (and associated others) in 2019.
Sure, buddies. Not even STARTED until at least 2019, huh? So that's why another lab, WITH THE SAME FUNDING SOURCE AS THE WUHAN LAB, FOR THE SAME RESEARCH MATTER, was so far along in their research that they could PUBLISH over three years earlier than that.
Short of remote viewing or the Demon himself having to admit something in his war crimes trial, this evidence is as close as the average American can get to knowing what really happened.
===============================
*For the deeper dive (39 minutes) video version, please find the following on my facebook page (page, not profile):
"Easy Dots to Connect on the Veracity and Criminality of One Tiny Unelected Dictator."
(I have placed many of my vids on alternate sites, but not this one yet, so I apologize to those who are avoiding Zuckerberg's Book of Illusion. I keep a profile there purely for activist purposes)*
Our illustrious illegitimate leader acting in the exact wrong way, as usual, CAUSING more chaos and risk of death to many humans and, specifically, Americans, than had he acted the correct way, which would be the exact opposite way he acted.
The reason I find that noteworthy this day is because a podcaster I just discovered talked recently about this general unwise tendency of the ilk of the illegitimate leader. And two days after hearing that, the Traitor-in-Chief shows exactly this tendency.
Props to:
2. Other podcast cited. https://www.brighteon.com/2c141a10-9693-4117-8e97-650a2c72eba4
If just as high of a viral load, then why would any argument exist that it is effective, let alone mandated?
Review and critique of an article around a study that showed ZERO difference in a key metric of the effectiveness of the body's response, between those who relied purely on nature and those who were convinced enough to submit to History's Largest Marketing Campaign and violated the sanctity of their body with an experimental substance.
Once again, billed as a Quick Rant of Truth in the audio, I'm going to say this is long enough to be a full episode.
As to the question implied by the title, part of the answer is "When you decide it is too much of an emergency to actually vet and study your 'preventative treatment.'"
First, I pose the question early, based on what I know of the mere differences in basic CONCEPT of how the new versions of "preventative treatment" work, versus the old.
(yes, being vague in terms in this description on purpose)
What are the limits on overproduction, since the body is being told to produce it, but not being told (nor can it be) how much?
What are the effects, God forbid, for those "far end of bell curve" folks who produce the MOST?
Besides the general overproduction risk, what of the SPECIFIC risk of overproduction, that depends on what the specific proteins the body is being told to produce (/potentially overproduce)?
Second, we find out evidence that overproduction, as expected, occurs sometimes. In a broad sense of admission of a "syndrome"
Related to this, if overproduction occurs, what is the limitation, if any, on where it may go and what systems it could wreak havoc on?
Then we find specific research from the developers themselves. Indeed while the traditional means was limited by how much was put in the body, and so resulted in a local reaction that created enough immune system response, overproduction due to the new technology is in no way limited to the area where it is introduced.
NO LESS THAN THE STUDIES FROM THE MANUFACTURERS THEMSELVES SHOW, WITH NO LESS THAN A RADIOACTIVE TAG, THAT IT SPREADS EVERYWHERE.
Finally, I connect a dot probably few are. Why is the risk profile across the population of this mere vare-ee-int (misspell on purpose) exactly the OPPOSITE of the initial novvull version? Quick answer - it's the treatment, stupid. The damaging protein is more likely to be overproduced by those with healthier systems. Across a population, that means those that are younger. The very demographics who basically had ZERO effect from the initial problem. Because their systems are healthier, they are more likely to be able to create new proteins, and therefore more subject to overproduction of a protein due to the unnatural instructions they're given. God forbid what that means for those systems of those age 18 and younger that are in a growth phase.
["explicit content" is a curse word toward the end of the episode, used as an expression of frustration]
Two main topics:
An outstanding site, that has provided outstanding information as it also always gives great citations for the information, so much so that it used to come up at the top of search results (it does not now, but not because its content has changed) is now practically an Enemy of the State, as the speech bullies are only more fully bolstered.
(14:47) A quick review of the devastatingly dramatic conclusions of study after study of just ONE particular treatment, that is easy and cheap and available, but does not match the narrative. Used as an emphasis of the types of scientific arrows this excellent source would have in his quiver, to inform you fully on all of your options to bullet-proof your health.
Every bit as dramatic as anything they can cite for "treatments" they're trying to psychologically force on everyone.
An expression I've used before - if their studies for their chemical-based patentable "treatments" showed half the effectiveness these these studies show, it would "launch a thousand marketing ships."
What's bad - of course one doesn't expect someone to promote the easy and cheap alternative to their product, but the bullies go beyond that and add disinformation, and now are openly suggesting cyber attacks on sites with the information.
We're deep in it, folks.
(Recorded on phone, like the Quick Hits of Truth, but long enough didn't feel it could or should be one of those.)
A lookback to an 11/9/2020 Pf-lie-zer propaganda piece on how well development of their "solution" was going.
Remember all that "YOU HAVE IT EVEN IF YOU DON'T KNOW IT IF THE 'RESULTS' SAY YOU DO!!! YOU DON'T HAVE TO EVEN BE COUGHING. STOP BEING IRRESPONSIBLE!!!"? How could you forget.
But when the liars want to validate their Big Pharma "solution" with progress update propaganda... THEN they count their solution as not working only if SYMPTOMS arise.
11:32 Smoking gun part of article - if there's no symptoms, our solution must be good!
You've been telling us all along that a lack of symptoms is not the point, and now your "90% EFFECTIVE" propaganda headline is based on whether people do not have symptoms???
==================================================
0:00 Intro of logic - marketing often misanalyzes what the science REALLY means, and just twist it for marketing reasons.
1:15 What article? "[Pf-Lie-zer] says [Big Pharma 'solution'] is looking 90% effective." A.P., Linda Johnson, et al.
1:49 ASIDE - marketing leading science, further explained, with PCR tech as the example. What it MADE sense for, versus how it was used anyway.
3:01 Delving into article. For some reason includes election propaganda statement too.
4:35: They've come to this conclusion upon only looking at 94 patients of an eventual 44,000??? That tells us... NOTHING. How did they select this stopping point for their "interim analysis" current conclusion?
6:00 ASIDE: effects of something being "covered" financially 100%.
6:46: Back to article.
6:56: Former Chief of FDA's vacks division speaks backwards. "Extremely promising" but "need to see the data." ummm... no.. it's NOT promising, because you don't KNOW anything yet.
7:55 Another expert makes my point - the propaganda headline and "promising results" is no more than an "interesting first signal."
8:20 Whole markets being "buoyed" by whom?? NO one has been buoyed by that man... ever. Errrbuddy knows.
9:37 Pf-LIE-zer's CEO saying words to make you believe he has human empathy. And adds other lies ("the end of so much work"???)
ASIDE on Fearci's regular routine of not REALLY saying anything except you could be safer.
11:32 Smoking gun part of article - if there's no symptoms, our solution must be good!
11:41 Let's... repeat that!
11:40 Repeat smoking gun.
12:03 Commentary on how it is that now a lack of symptoms means we must NOT have it, when all along we've said the opposite?
Believe the data, not the reality in front of you. Believe the matrix.
16:06 PCR over sensitivity analysis - magnifying past pixelization of an "evidence" photo.
18:45 Emphasis on effect of mandates overtaking free enterprise (/ selective non-skepticism of corporations by the left)
Are you getting the game yet? Step One: They Lie. Step Two: You decide whether to believe their lie. Step Three: Repeat.
(Explicit is just for a handful of (aggressive) curses)
I'd always heard of these stories, some of the most famous in UFO lore, but had never seen the visual evidence. But here's where I did find it.
"Don't worry... it passed safety studies."
Yes... but... we now allow toxins and even carcinogens, under the idea that the studied product on its own "doesn't contribute much effect."
So what about endless numbers of toxins being introduced "a little" at a time.
You can get to a million by one chunk of one million, or you can get to a million by advancing ten at a time. Either way, you've got a million. But our way of doing things says "don't worry - it's just ten."
Quick Rant of Truth is a new feature.
As you can see, my tendency here is to cover things comprehensively. Which is great, but requires much more prep, and then paralysis of analysis.
These will be quick. Most of which will just be recorded on my phone. So no "radio voice" processing.
This one my reaction to a "blah blah blah" content-free, typical, corporate social media post on linked in on "saving the world." And my analysis as to how it is cheerleading and missing the point.
Kim and I team up to host special guest Michael Austin of the Kansas Policy Institute. Michael appeared on our radar earlier this year due to his outstanding work, along with The Sentinel, on finding seemingly purposeful mischaracterizations of covid data in Kansas by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) Secretary Lee Norman with vast political effects (Here, and here, among others).
That work has continued through a series of stories, many STEEPED in data, and some that hit national media, honestly dwarfing anything the print media in Kansas has done.
Michael discusses his background, getting started with THE issue of 2020, background and explanation of the stories, the lack of true full-spectrum analysis of the subject, and his beliefs in what are important themes and next steps for Kansans and Americans.
[On social media I created a video slideshow with the basics of a logic chain laid out in about 4 minutes as to why to have a more critical eye on both the origin of this virus and on its main cheerleader. I do that here, and then go through the sources I used and add analysis and further commentary. After creating two videos and absorbing the material more, this has more interstitial aspects of connecting things than do the two videos]
The outline of the logic chain is below. 1. In October 2014, N.I.H. halts new funding of "gain-of-function" experimentation in viruses. It is one thing to study a virus, another to engineer to make it worse or to allow it to cross species.
Soon after, STILL in '14, the bad doctor, who has a HISTORY of espousing and defending gain-of-function virus experimentation is instrumental in EXPORTING the research.
He not only exports it. He exports it to the United States' KEY RIVAL, and the KEY RIVAL to the philosophy of freedom... CHINA.
That is, the bad doctor is instrumental in exporting "make viruses more dangerous" research, funded with U.S. money, to the ONLY Level Four lab in ALL of China, so they can do the VERY research that WE have stopped doing. The lab attains "level 4" status in '15, ONLY after this "research" starts.
This ban is not lifted until December 2017. And then, if a review panel approves the proposed studies.
We already have enough for treason. Plain and simple.
That lab is in... Wuhan.* It worked on bat coronaviruses.
U.S. Embassy officials visit the lab in '18, after which they send diplomatic cables expressing their concern over what they consider the inadequacy of the lab's expertise and safety mechanisms.
The "pandemic" begins.
After initial denials, U.S. intelligence announces the virus could have escaped from a lab.
A Nobel Prize winner (Montagnier) says on French TV, in no uncertain terms, that his team concludes the virus is built on a bat virus but is clearly the product of genetic engineering on top of that virus.
It is easy to find articles about its striking uniqueness in some ways compared to what should be its sister viruses. This is quite in line with it being engineered.
The opening "briefing" of the logic string that I prove further and comment an analyze further in the next episode.
[On social media I created a video slideshow with the basics of a logic chain laid out in about 4 minutes as to why to have a more critical eye on both the origin of this virus and on its main cheerleader. I do that here, taking a little longer. The commentary and analysis will be on the next episode. After creating two videos and absorbing the material more, that commentary is more sophisticated than that in the two videos]
In October 2014, N.I.H. halts new funding of "gain-of-function" experimentation in viruses. It is one thing to study a virus, another to engineer to make it worse or to allow it to cross species.
Soon after, STILL in '14, the bad doctor, who has a HISTORY of espousing and defending gain-of-function virus experimentation is instrumental in EXPORTING the research.
He not only exports it. He exports it to the United States' KEY RIVAL, and the KEY RIVAL to the philosophy of freedom... CHINA.
That is, the bad doctor is instrumental in exporting "make viruses more dangerous" research, funded with U.S. money, to the ONLY Level Four lab in ALL of China, so they can do the VERY research that WE have stopped doing. The lab attains "level 4" status in '15, ONLY after this "research" starts.
This ban is not lifted until December 2017. And then, if a review panel approves the proposed studies.
We already have enough for treason. Plain and simple.
That lab is in... Wuhan.* It worked on bat coronaviruses.
U.S. Embassy officials visit the lab in '18, after which they send diplomatic cables expressing their concern over what they consider the inadequacy of the lab's expertise and safety mechanisms.
The "pandemic" begins.
After initial denials, U.S. intelligence announces the virus could have escaped from a lab.
A Nobel Prize winner (Montagnier) says on French TV, in no uncertain terms, that his team concludes the virus is built on a bat virus but is clearly the product of genetic engineering on top of that virus.
It is easy to find articles about its striking uniqueness in some ways compared to what should be its sister viruses. This is quite in line with it being engineered.
NOW... Understand... the MAIN public figure for interpreting the situation, and "reacting" is a guy who quite possibly, is "but for" RESPONSIBLE for it!
THIS is the guy we're having throw out first pitches for the baseball season.
At the VERY least, the man famous for the term "you're fired!" should do that to the bad doctor / tiny un-elected dictator, at LEAST to the extent of him no longer being allowed to be ANY kind of a mouthpiece for this scenario.
Just as a judge can be too involved in a situation and should recuse himself or herself, absolutely and positively also should the bad doctor.
At the most, and this is not even an extreme interpretation given the facts, he should be removed from office, and taken into custody, and then prosecuted.
*6.5. Given this context, it makes Fauci's potentially innocuous statement during a speech from 2017, that this administration WILL have a surprise outbreak to deal with, more suspicious.
When you think of it, any investigative agency worth its salt and caring about the biggest implications of this, and how different it is than anything historically as to our reactions and the scale of the consequences of our reactions, should be looking into EVERY aspect of the bad doctor's life, connecting ALL the pieces, ALL the finances, ALL the travel, ALL the communication, and ALL the networking. Because "suspicious" and "possibly hugely connected to a larger conspiracy" is very obvious here.
===========================
Oh by the way, there is a November 2015 article in Nature AROUND an earlier bat virus being engineered by scientists in a way that facilitated it becoming a human respiratory illness. It is now, OF COURSE, flagged with a "nothing to see here, no connection has been proven" message, but.. given the above... their denial is not persuasive and it is really entirely inappropriate to even place it there.
[CORRECTION: The broad point and the logic absolutely holds for mortality rate as we presented and then proofed out. However, early on, I misinterpreted numbers I saw for deaths on a Kansas visual chart on the topic - the bars on the reporting charts did not represent full reporting weeks, they represented days. So when I said most weeks had only one death and no more than four, that was incorrect. This did not affect my interpretation or analysis of overall mortality however, and it is still true that the biggest spikes were not recently]
Tyson teams with his co-host for Kimology 411 - Kim Schultz.
Short of missing population studies, we are left to our own devices as to whether that very high mortality rate predicted - 10 to 30 times that of the flu - panned out.
Tyson and Kim visit the broad subject again, and Tyson steers the deep dive on Kansas numbers, to make the excellent case of that an incredibly conservative analysis of total infection still results in mortality rate being very low in the state. Similar logic should apply to almost any state.
We added a lot of impromptu content, but the rough logic presented is below and it was presented in this order.
Conservatively figured mortality rate:
· Mortality rate = Total deaths DIVIDED BY Total infected. · 277 dead in Kansas from this. · Very conservative estimate of infection in Kansas, deliberately halving conservative numbers otherwise arrived at: 174,000 (with easy arguments that it is much, much higher than that) · 277 / 174,000 = 0.001592 = 0.1592%
o An easy argument (see below) is made that at least 246,500 Kansans have been infected, which brings this mortality to 0.001124, or 0.1124%. And even this may be a very high mortality estimate (see proofs below). · These are in the range of the seasonal flu, which is usually pegged at 0.1% or so. o Considering I halved the denominator I’d have otherwise come to, mortality rates of well below 0.001, or 0.1%, are just as, or more, probable.
================================================ Proofs below
· PROOF: Numerator of mortality rate. 277: This is the most known and solid number. This includes deaths not only confirmed cases but unconfirmed but “probable” (though, I ask, at an average age at death of EIGHTY, (at least where it was just a few weeks ago) how is it “probable” when it otherwise mimics other respiratory illnesses that could kill someone near the end of their life. For example, do not eighty-year-olds near end of life die of the flu?)
· PROOF: Denominator. 174,000 to 246,500 (with arguments for much larger): Because the state has not done a population study, we are left to our own devices to understand the spread in Kansas. That said, we have good info to get an approximate range, that, by any measure, shows mortality to not be at the initial, model-based, alarming estimate.
Per CDC data, the regular flu infected from 12 to 17% of the U.S. in approximately six months. 39 to 56 million out of 331 million.
These percentages of 12 to 17% infection of the population are a good estimate of the spread of this disease now. Here's why:
1:22 Summary
6,501 in Kansas, 152 deaths, 608 hospitalizations, 41,207 negative.
~ 269K deaths on the planet. Allegedly 77K in U.S. (even though not a week ago, it went from 61K or 64K to 37K, a day or two after which Trump says he expects 100K).
20.5M jobs lost in April.
2:44 Headlines I give the middle finger to today… “Emergency Coffin Shipments arriving in Brazil.” U.S. News and World Report.
Expected usual Brazil deaths per year – 1,378,000. Versus 277K for ALL of planet so far for this.
4:33 They’re closing WHAT? Looking for excuses to disrupt, not support, our food supply??
They have also actively tested a lot of the prisoner population for some idiotic reason.
11:10 Phased and Confused: States opening in phases.
Kansas I:5/4; II: 5/18; III: Around 6/2; IV: Around 6/15.
Moving goal posts?
Pluses and minuses of testing in propaganda terms of more testing and false positive testing
21:55 Kentucky case study. 4.68% mortality? Not at all. So what is that actual denominator for Kentucky?
14% NY State, 21% NYC.
Bay area, 4/17. STANFORD study. Santa Clara. 2.49% to 4.16% infected. Up to 85 times higher than what health officials tallied. 48,000 to 81,000. Versus reported number of 956.
4/20/20: LA County 863 tested. They estimated 4.1% infection. 221K to 442K infected – 28 to 55 times higher than confirmed cases.
4/24 Miami University says ~6 % of Dade County
So for Kentucky, let’s go with 7%. Denominator therefore 7% of 4.4M. => 308,000
294 / 308,000 = .00095. That is 95/1000 of a percent. 100/1000 = 1/10. So just short of that usual 1/10 of one percent given for flu mortality.
30:45 Memory hole – Cali governor said up to 56% of Cali within 6 weeks.
2,585 Cali deaths as of today… (.56 of 39.5M = 22,120,000)
2,585 / 22,120,000 = 0.00012. one one-hundredth of 1 percent mortality.
32:10 Asymptomatic Follow-Up
Florida - ~50% had no symptoms in the 14 to 17 days before the test.
33:15 Test Kits’ Fallibility. UCSF, UC Berkeley researchers 4/27/20
Some 120 available antibody test kits. Tested a dozen of them.
“many of the test kits have false positive rates that may exceed the proportion of people who have been infected in some communities.”
“I realized [the tests] had not been systematically validated and we needed to figure out which ones would really work,” said Patrick Hsu, PhD, an assistant professor of bioengineering at UC Berkeley and investigator at the Innovative Genomics Institute, a joint research collaboration between the two campuses focused on CRISPR.
Some further clarity on the nasopharyngeal versus the antibody tests. From same article, backing up what I said about the idea that nearly no one had symptoms in the Kansas state prison:
“Antibody Tests Complement PCR Diagnostics
"Current diagnostic tests, such as the standard RT-PCR (reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) test conducted on samples obtained from nasopharyngeal swabs, can tell doctors if someone is currently infected, but antibody tests might be able identify people who have been exposed to the virus even weeks after an initial infection. Antibody tests could be particularly useful for identifying those who have been infected but never showed symptoms. Some controversial studies have suggested that the proportion of such cases could be as high as one in four."
Another doozy from the same article.
"Nevertheless, the team is hampered by the lack of a definitive antibody test with which to compare the many new test kits on the market.
“'One of the cornerstones of lab medicine is that a new test is compared to a definitive reference or gold standard,' Marson said. 'We do not have a gold standard yet for COVID-19 serology testing, so we are amassing data on a standardized set of blood samples and really looking at how each of these tests performs in relationship to all the others.'”
Though not yet peer reviewed.
39:40 Schools in phase IV
TOLD you too big of a decision too early would result in "leaders" doubling down.
Further, why? How?
Despite numbers saying old people are overwhelmingly who is at risk for death.
50:02 “As of this week, more than 19,000... deaths have been associated with long-term care facilities, according to data from 42 states collected by NBC News.”
WHO: Half of all ... deaths in Europe have happened in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities.
51:45 (A little older) --> Kaiser: “Our data collection effort finds that in the 23 states that publicly report death data as of April 23, 2020, there have been over 10,000 reported deaths due to [this] in long-term care facilities (including residents and staff), representing 27% of deaths due to [this] in those states. . . . In six states reporting data, deaths in long-term care facilities account for over 50% of all [the deaths from this] (Delaware, Massachusetts, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Colorado, and Utah; Table 2).”
MSN "Senior Care Homes Source of Nearly Half of All California [deaths from this], Data Shows."
May 9.
"At least 1,276 people have died after being infected with the [disease] in skilled nursing or assisted living facilities in California, accounting for more than 49% of total fatalities reported by the state."
54:50 Ohio Case study.
Ohio, 4/16/20. The state has confirmed 8,239 positive cases with 2,331 hospitalizations and 373 deaths, according to the state health department. More than 855,000 people have filed for unemployment benefits in the state, according to the Department of Labor.
Ohio updated 5/8/20… 1306 / 23,016 total confirmed. 5.7%.
Only 23,016 infected out of 11.5M? So only 2/10 of one percent infected? Yuhright.
Let’s just go with a fairly conservative 6% infected. That means .06*11.5M = 690,000.
1,306/690,000 = 0.00189. So not far from 2/10 of a percent mortality rate.
But so many Ohio dead were from long-term care centers
But subtract 500 – see below. So 806 / 23,016 = 3.5% using just confirmed cases.
806/690,000 = 0.001168. Just over 1/10 of one percent – order of magnitude of flu.
60:04 OHIO nursing facilities deaths:
"Close to 500 residents of long-term care centers have died of [this] in the past three weeks, according to data released by the state this week."
. . .
"Overall, the nursing home deaths reported since April 15 account for 40% of all the virus-related deaths in Ohio since the first one was reported in mid-March."
66:57 Versus flu:
KS 2.9M/335M * 61,000 = 528 deaths. Versus 152 to date.
Kentucky 4.4M/335M * 61,000 = 801 deaths. Versus 294 to date.
68:40 Problem – reaction – solution Tyson's corollary to it.
71:17 NYC Numbers: 7500 “of”, 4000 “with”, versus only 3000 higher total number of deaths.
Tyson weighs in on recent stories about very high alleged active infection among prison population (and no, he doesn't mean the whole planet.. bdnkSHHHH) yet many (ALL in one case) being asymptomatic.
:20 INTRODUCTION AND HOUSEKEEPING:
Go check out the glyphosate episode (the previous episode)
2:00 What considering for next serious episodes.
3:00 Kimology 411 partnership / co-hosting
4:00 Off and running on today's topics - overview.
5:20 CHIEFS: WHAT'S WRONG?
WASTING "WINNING LOTTERY TICKET"?
7:10 The pre-Mahomes dynamics: Alex Smith, Reid, and the super weapon Tyreek.
8:00 A seeming revolutionary offensive innovation... abandoned? Why? Why abandoning a net positive when your achievable goals are higher than ever?
10:42 in-game decisions. Deja vu for Philly fans from the Reid era? Similarities, or no?
11:44 IS REID WHY KC MAY NOT TAKE THE NEXT STEP?
What if instead of Mahomes making Reid less conservative in big moments...
What if a vicious circle to that effect occurs?
15:30 Reid the problem in moments? '14 playoffs versus Colts. '18 playoffs versus Titans. And then similarity to last two weeks.
17:10 Details of egregiousness in game strategy the last two losses. Not using your league MVP.
24:30 This season a MACROcosm of Reid's tendencies when ahead in big games? TISS (Turtle in Shell Syndrome).
27:40 The problem of "domesticating" your offense.
----28:02 An analogy about the first five weeks of 2018 Mahomes: "Is that woman a block away as hot as she seems - further investigation is necessary."
----Veach "Smartest man in room" effect on few defensive bright spots. Wishes his way towards a better defense.
----Civilize offense based on "better defense" this year.. except... about that... .
34:00 MAHOMES REGRESSION?
Literally, it is a reasonable question.
In the looser sense (is he really not very good?), it is not (Overhyped young QBs with nowhere near the stats, but looked good due to other parts of the team being exceptional).
2019 Stats show him to still be top-tier.
41:40 THE FLIPPIN' PATRIOTS. Six and zero again. Will Brady "Last Year of Peyton" his way to another Super Bowl??
43:11 Is Pats defense performing at an all-time level? Analysis and historical comparison.
48:28 But even the last years of the a first-ballot QB can have a huge effect on the team.
50:44 NON CALLS, BAD CALLS, BAD RULES. Rules put in place, but "I do not think it means what you think it means." Comparison to the NBA.
Three horrible calls in week 6 MNF, Lions at Packers - three-dimensionality of the world apparently confusing the refs.
Orwellian rules? Gaslighting?
59:08 WRAP-UP: Preview what serious things we may cover next. Kimology 411. Where you can find and contact me.
Monsanto (/Bayer), losing three suits so far in California, with massive punitive damages, meant to deter bad corporate behavior when they act with "oppression, fraud, or malice."
In one case the jury was so convinced, they awarded TWO BILLION DOLLARS (yet the judge carried Monsanto's water and knocked it down to less than 1/20th of that).
After each case, Monsanto insists the product is utterly safe. Yet jurors were convinced of the exact opposite, through discovery papers now known as "The Monsanto Papers."
2015, The IARC, part of the World Health Organization, categorizes glyphosate as "Probably Carcinogenic to humans." But Monsanto (and now Bayer) insists otherwise.
2018, California announces it will add glyphosate to Prop 65 list. But Monsants/Bayer insists it's all wrong.
So what is the truth? "What did Monsanto know and when did they know it?" If there is anything to know.
The Scales of Truth will get you there, and discuss societal interstitials along the way.
Episode timestamped summary below:
Opening remarks / Set up
1:10 Recent lawsuits, most around Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma.
A quick survey of summary expert quotes from a trusted source.
6:07 June ‘19 WebMD article about colorectal cancer, absolutely in line with above quotes, while not acknowledging as a possible cause. Plus related commentary on narrative of article.
12:54 A farmer’s blog understates things.
14:36 Timeline of glyphosate and Roundup.
21:25 What “Punitive Damages” means. Recent adjustments by judges in line??
24:10 Health effects list
26:30 “800 studies”
27:45 Intro of a main source – SourceWatch
29:05 How glyphosate works as an herbicide (primary and secondary mechanisms)
32:09 Canada labels, to confirm what Roundup Ready really means.
33:10 Canada label recent adds - Toxic to aquatic organisms.
33:50 GMO Answers, on glyphosate levels for food from Roundup Ready crops.
36:16 Doesn’t survive food processing?? Two examples.
37:10 Herbicide increased usage stats.
41:09 HOW IT WORKS AND WHAT IT DAMAGES. Equiterre.org objects to Canada consider to renew, based on Monsanto paper revelations, studies, and other info. Monarchs and bees. Microbiomes. Birth defects in frogs and chickens at low doses. Neural defects and craniofacial malformations in humans in high-herbicide use areas (S. America). Surfactants worsen problem. Endocrine disruption in human placental cells. Affect ability to change androgen to estrogen. Severe mitochondrial damage, necrosis, and programmed cell death in embryonic and placental cells, at low doses. DNA damage in cell lines. Mammary and kidney tumors in rats.
~49:45 ASIDE: Back to farmer’s blog, and on general phenomenon of rationalizations that come along with something being connected to your livelihood.
51:05 Back to HOW IT WORKS AND WHAT IT DAMAGES.
52:00 ASIDE: What is endocrine system, and JEG-3 cells, previously mentioned.
52:28 Source strength of cited journals.
57:07 ASIDE: Revelations of knowledge, from 2002 Monsanto emails. Endocrine disruption, surfactants, endocrine damage in frogs.
1:02:08 Back to HOW IT WORKS AND WHAT IT DAMAGES.
1:03:20 ASIDE: Scientific American 2009 article citing study. Plus a bit of Rantaliciousness. Deadly to human cells, at very diluted levels. Attach proper outrage when we have enough evidence.
1:09:36 Back to Source Watch, HOW IT WORKS AND WHAT IT DAMAGES. Disruption of soil and root microbial community composition.
1:12:20 Earth Open Source article, like a journal article – ROUNDUP AND BIRTH DEFECTS: IS THE PUBLIC KEPT IN THE DARK.
1:13:38 ASIDE: Societal pattern. Point on when “science” IS “science” and when it is not.
1:16:00 Even “drift” levels of glyphosate can impact iron uptake in crops. Ill effect for crops themselves and on consumers of crops. Ill effect on crops is widely reported (chlorosis), but not yet generally associated to this cause.
1:17:14 ASIDE: Societal phenomenon - Not connecting the dots, and instead things being “mysterious” or vague. “Disorder” instead of a specific sharply-defined condition with a specific cause and effect. Parallel between crop and human “mysterious problems.”
1:18:38 2015 IARC (branch of World Health Organization) RULING – PROBABLY CARCINOGENIC TO HUMANS.
1985 EPA originally categorized as possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on a mouse study. EPA changed their mind, but still admitted if they’d used IARC statistical standards, it would have been statistically significance(!!).
1:24:20 CORRUPT PRACTICES - European Union dismissing 2010 findings of birth defects in frogs and chicken embryos at low doses, favoring old unpublished industry studies over independent Argentinian study. But Open Source said those old sources showed causation of birth defects.
1:27:16 CORRUPT PRACTICES – Health Canada's reevaluation / renewal by Pest Management Regulatory Agency based on studies skewed by bias. Studies ghost-written by Monsanto personnel. Knowledge of insufficient testing. Including admissions during testimony of ghost writing. Ignoring advice of consulting scientist.
One of goals of 20-person panel to prepare for IARC's pending negative decision - “establish public perspective on IARC.” Establish public perception??? It's the premier agency in the world dedicated to cancer research! “regulator outreach.”
1:41:05 Attempts to remove U.S. Funding for IARC. Front group formed in order to discredit. Similar to response to California labeling.
1:44:48 Source article switch, to a Mercola article.
ASIDE on censorship. Recent censorship through demotion.
1:46:48 “WHITEWASH: THE STORY OF A WEED KILLER, CANCER, AND THE CORRUPTION OF SCIENCE.”
Industrial Biotech Laboratories, hired by Monsanto, got caught for fraud. EPA declared results invalid. Monsanto refused to accept early (1980's) EPA findings of “Possibly Carcinogenic”!!
ASIDE on parallel to unwanted and failed legislation.
EPA goes against findings of their own toxicologists.
1:53:57 ASIDE “Yeah, but 'science,' and 'scientists.”
Kraven Laboratories, hired by Monsanto, caught falsifying test results.
1:55:40 MORE EMAILS. Knowledge of inadequate testing. Realizing a re-evaluation by a prestigious organization would turn out badly.
Advanced orchestration of campaign to discredit IARC.
1:59:50 “independent panel of experts” to review IARC findings, yet safety lead of Monsanto actively wrote and edited the review for them.
ASIDE: The BIG lie is the big bluff for liars. “They wouldn't lie about something THAT big!” Yes. They would. And re-emphasis of “proper outrage.”
Public record, being changed through influence, becomes what the influencers can hang their hat on.
Four-day scientific advisory panel after IARC findings, many questions raised. Industry interests remove epidemiologist over allegation he'd give more weight to independent research(!!!).
2:07:25 ASIDE on blanket reactions to “greedy lawyers.” Case-by-case is key.
2:08:42 “THIS ONE'S NUTSOID.” (no.. f'real).
EPA official believes she “should get a medal” if she can stop HHS toxic substances agency from looking into glyphosate toxicity, even as EPA co-worker says “essentially certain” it causes cancer(!!!). Warned Monsanto of IARC's ruling MONTHS ahead of announcement.
2:14:55 ASIDE: Did Monsanto ever even have to replace the leashes after all these years???
Taxpayer-paid subsidization of propaganda about safety of a product for which there is all kinds of evidence that it is unsafe(!!!)
2:16:40 MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENT: EPA going against all usual practice of allowing California to be MORE strict in its safety and environmental standards.
2:21:08 RELATED TOPICS / MISCELLANEOUS THOUGHTS
-High percentage of trials from major trial sponsors stay unpublished – So what’s there?
-2012 Study linking Roundup-Ready corn to tumors in rats. VERY Damning.
-2:29:37 Sources, not particularly emphasized previously, but a fairly incomplete list.
-ASIDE on practical censorship on what was a TOP-level source to most health info consumers.
2:35:07 RELATED THREADS – mere mentions of things for you to investigate if you’re interested.
2:38:30 1947 ADVERTISING. Laughable… NOW. But showing the long-term history of massive disinfo by same company responsible for the current poisoning. Unbelievable.
2:44:26 “INSIDE THE MONSANTO BOARDROOM,” an imagining of how the current state came to be (except more sarcastic).
2:47:25 A RE-EMPHASIS on why exposure after Roundup-Ready, versus exposure before, statistically approaches infinity, even as pesticide usage does not.
0:00-0:32 Intro
0:32-1:09 Preview of what main topic - glyphos1:09BREAKING NEWS, BREAKING NEWS
1:53 Back to regularly scheduled programming. Simple fun stuff as a warm-up.
2nd NFL week finished.
Last Chiefs-Raiders game in Oakland.
2:36 Mahomie goes video game mode. Crazy 2nd quarter yards, possible NFL record in consecutive long completions.
4:20 AFC Least. SOOO annoying for those fans of teams in better overall divisions. Pats' easy yearly path.
5:54 ANNOUNCEMENT, with slight correction from last episode. KIMOLOGY 411! (Just recorded "episode zero" tonight, and it was a lot of fun).
7:10 Facebook page - new!
7:40 Fantasy Football - Tyson's first year!! The good and bad of the new habit/challenge.
9:08 Injured QBs galore! End of the Reign of Eli.
10:15 Kaep back? Probs NAH. Tyson's "ex girlfriend's lame new BF" analogy. Quick CSI on that whole thing - Tyson verbalizes both sides.
15:55 The Lamar Jackson challenge.
16:38 Antonio Brown went WHERE?? pulls hair out
17:20 A.B. fresh allegations. The worm has turned with Goodell? NBA $$$$ a motivation? Hill and A.B benefit from new pattern?
22:00 Prepare for the biiiig topic of the day. RounnBREAKINGNEWSBREAKINGNEWS
Hello Again!
After a drought, I'm popping back on here, to both pick up this podcast and for a special announcement.
2017 Masters Win by Sergio. Reflections.
Masters means Tiger... a statistical remembrance of his non-repeatable accomplishments, along with a mourning of his golfing career and recognition of valid argument that Nicklaus is still the best.
0-2:55 Intro
2:55 Sergio Masters Win
6:30 Garcia - Kobe likability analogy.
8:05 Narrative change as round went on.
9:42 Back nine progression.
13:12 Tiger's Legacy
15:40 The irritating thing about his career drop-off. Will power. Grindless.
18:00 Post-Scandal: The Tiger has no clothes. Mental intimidation gone.
21:25 The change In mindset once dominance / consistency disappears. Appeal related. Kobe analogy.
24:13 Tiger measurables versus Nicklaus or anyone else.
26:58: Strength of competition
28:30: Tournament win percentage
29:18: Overall wins and win percentage
33:08: Scoring average crowns - # of crowns and historically significant averages versus others.
40:11 Total weeks ranked #1 and consecutive weeks at #1.
46:59 Consecutive win streaks
50:34 Consecutive cuts made
54:05 Win percentage revisited and clarified.
Intro and outro music both are "Alien Operator" by the band "Alien Operator." Creative commons license, with attribution required, non-commercial use.
freemusicarchive.org/music/Alien_Op…Alien_Operator
Episode Five is my first longer format, mixed topic episode. Warning - first part is a sports take, and second part probably my first real potentially controversial political take.
First, my thoughts on the Raiders moving to Vegas definitely, but not YET actually moving. Purely a sports take - should not irritate those trying to avoid political talk.
Second, starting at about 8:53, definite political take of something in Sports: The NCAA, associated with colleges, which are supposed to be bastions of wide academic and social discourse, is beyond its bounds trying to approve or disapprove of reasonable decisions by state legislatures, as it bans events in North Carolina for it's gender-bathroom bill.
UPDATE: I misquoted the title - it's FOUR HOUR Work Week. Duh. I knew that but it just occurred to me. Oh well.
How John Calipari's approach is like Timothy Ferris' productivity book "The Four-Hour Workbook."
(Further, I said "Call-i-pari" instead of "Cal-i-pari." Apologies, but I'd rather stick with what I organically laid down instead of re-recording it.)
Philosophy of "fringe" topics, plus Flat Earth Fun - one of points that actually has some intrigue. If Kyrie and Shaq are proponents, why not at least discuss. It's fun.
Introduction and exit music both "Alien Operator" by the band Alien Operator