jurisdiction's Podcast: Recent Episodes
None
David Pekarek Krohn and Danielle Grant-Keane of Perkins Coie LLP discuss “The Coming Wave – Preparing for the Rise of Patent Litigation in the Augmented and Virtual Reality Sector”.
Johannes Hsu of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses the Tabaian v. Intel Corp. decision and his paper “Disqualifying an Expert: When is an Expert’s Prior Relationship Prejudicial to the Opposing Party?”
Dr. Sarah Kagan of Banner & Witcoff in Washington D.C. discusses “Patent Wars: Genome Editing” and the latest developments in the CRISPR patent wars: U Cal v. Broad
Eric Ball and Athul Acharya of Fenwick & West discuss their article "Honey Badger Don’t Care, but the Lanham Act Might" regarding Gordon v. Drape Creative and trademarks vs freedom of speech.
Christopher Loh of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the Amgen v. Sanofi CAFC decision and his paper “End of ‘well characterized antigen’ test?”
Linda Wadler and Alissa Lipton of Finnegan discuss the SCOTUS decision in WesternGeco v. Ion Geophysical regarding recovering foreign lost profits damages for patent infringement. Their case comment.
Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP and Jerry Chen of JZC Intellectual Property Law discuss their involvement as counsel in Canada’s first electronic patent trial.
Micheline Gravelle, Don MacOdrum, Mike Fenwick and Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP discuss “The Promise of the Patent” and the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Astrazeneca
John Crittenden of Cooley discusses reverse confusion of trademarks in “Squirrels Armed with Bazookas”
Prof. Christopher Robertson of the University of Arizona on blinding expert witnesses to reduce bias: Bias in Litigation Science and Blind Expertise.
Jeanne M. Gills of Foley & Lardner LLP in Chicago discusses “What’s Reasonable? Protecting And Enforcing Trade Secrets” (article, slides)
Philip Harrison of Venner Shipley discusses the “Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions in Europe”
Marco Quina of Foley Hoag discusses Kimble v Marvel and “How Not to Get Snared in Brulotte’s Web”.
Bruce Sunstein of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP discusses Patent Strategies for Getting a Software Patent Invention Through the Alice Thicket. (Sunstein Law Review article on Alice)
William Jay of Goodwin Procter LLP discusses issue preclusion and the SCOTUS decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis.
Elliot Cook of Finnegan Henderson discusses patent eligibility in the wake of Alice, Ultramercial and DDR.
Cynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto discuss “Canada Takes the Battle on Counterfeits to its Borders”.
Katharine Stephens of Bird & Bird, London, England, discusses Unitary Patents and the Unified Patent Court. (Length: 16:17)
Mark Powell and Maria Holtmann of The Office for International Patent Cooperation, USPTO, Washington D.C., discuss “The Global Dossier Initiative”. (Video) [Length: 16:54]
Cynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto describe “Big Changes to the Canadian Trade-marks Act – What You Need to Know, Now”
Rob Reid, author of “Year Zero” discusses the absurdity of copyright law, aliens and treble damages. See also his Ted Talk on the The $8 billion iPod and the ABA Landslide book review of Year Zero.
Mark Wine of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses “The Extraterritorial Reach of the ITC in SI Group v. Sino Legend”. See also Orrick’s quarterly report “The World in US Courts” and Trade Secrets Watch blog.
Christopher Carani of McAndrews Held & Mollow Ltd in Chicago Illinois and DesignPatentAttorney.com on “Apple v. Samsung”
Selvyn Seidel of Fulbrook Capital Management in New York City on “Third Party Financing Patent Litigation”
Belinda Scrimenti of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP in Chicago discusses her papers entitled “100 Years of Seeing RED - A Historical Perspective on the Second Circuit's "Red-Sole Shoe" Mark Decision in Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent” and “A Legal Kaleidoscope – Single Color Trademarks, From pre-Owens-Corning Pink Insulation to Louboutin Red-Soled Shoes”
Donald M. Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto Canada explains the Canadian Supreme Court decision in Teva v. Pfizer on the VIAGRA use patent.
Karen Canady of Candy + Lortz in Los Angeles provides a patent attorney’s view of the basics of genes and the hotly-contested litigation over biotechnology patents.
Trevor Cook of Bird & Bird, London England discusses “English Patent Litigation – Under New Management”
James Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle”
Cynthia Lopez Beverage of ST Ericsson in Santa Clara California discusses “Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”.
Robert Fischer of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas.
Gareth Morgan of Winston & Strawn LLP, London, England explains the Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions.
Bart Showalter of Baker Botts LLP in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category.
p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 16.0px 'Times New Roman'; color: #053df5} span.s1 {text-decoration: underline} span.s2 {color: #000000} Paul England of the London Office of Simmons & Simmons discusses “Cross-border Injunctions in Europe”